The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-75.-2-8 MAJOR SUBDIVISION Complete application received Yield map received 7.h NO Application reviewed at work sessionix�io.` OK MOK Applicant advised of necessary revisions glcla, riwsv i.. ;w L Revised submission received ixro� OK tnj OK Sketch plan approval see+ ti -with conditions / _ , y_g Lead Agency Coordination ; _I y —q I SERA determination 1_z ueS -"4x • , J , �q 51 —1,� f,%0 30--9 I p Preliminary maps received 141,411 . _ Preliminary maps reviewed at work session da 9z ixro. Ot<_, p -revisions / w L/ zff qL OK Road profiles/drainage submitted i I qa iro.` OK -revisions ixro, OK rAUmI" Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer C7� / 'd z ixro� z OK Z MkVialy fe F2_ N 5 o ia1z ade INFO. OK v, r• Sent to County Planning Commission I q ix'mio� OK Receipt of County Planning Report s) of 4z ixro` OK Review of SCPC report 0 V�l Pr eliminary hearing � 6)z9/'j2- chse9 6(+�9�9z z I Preliminary approval zo N -with conditions _ Sent to Fire Commissioner 13o Iq2 A � v Receipt of fireweil location azo yZ _ *, �� (ryr ,�,�z7)s Q Notification to applicant to include on final map 4492. - I "40 5/1711 o c Draft Covenants and Restrictions received xro. OK 0 CD „ CDo Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed ix"Oro.` OK it N Filed Covenants and Restrictions received V "E x t3�- Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB Bond adopted by TB Payment of bond Payment of Inspection fee Determination of park&playground fee Park&playground fee adopted by TB Payment of park&playground fee Open Space documents Documents reviewed by TA OK Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions Endorsement of subdivision MS P,6 P. 0. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 April 20, 1990 BY HAND Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Major subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz at Southold ( 1000-75-2-8 and 9) Dear Sirs : Please find enclosed the following : 1 ) Application for approval of plat 2 ) Filing fee in the amount of $4600 3) Long Environmental Assessment Form 4) Twelve prints of proposed subdivision plan Sincerely, eE Ra� r. HER:ml Encs . 23 1.,,.1�6,27)-7c 617.21 SEOR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.• ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Major subdivison of Jerome & Cichanowicz Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer h, 3 Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(lf different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe - on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involx new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif each instance. NAME OF ACTION Ma 'or subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Ma le Avenue, Southold, New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR Henr E. Ra nor, Jr. BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS b16 )298-8420 P. O. Drawer A CITY/Po James ort, STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) NY 11947 Frank A. Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADgqRESS ( ) c/o Briarcliff, Main Road Mple Avenue Peconic, NY 11958 Southold, NY 11971 STATE ZIP CODE , DESCRIPTION OF ACTION major subdivision of 36 acres L Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest (Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 36 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREACE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, acres acres pasture, etc.) _ 36 acres 17 Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topsoil, loam, sand a. Soil drainage: 97Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained g ❑Poorly drained % of site o of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified,within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification Systems acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). " 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes _ CxNO a. That is depth to bedrock? (in fee[) 2 gpproximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ®0-10% 100 % 010-15% %u 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes IRNo C '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes No 8. What is the depth of the water table? + 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes Ls9No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes nNO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ®No According to on information and belief Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) []Yes iDNo Describe • 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes 8JNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: n/a a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? CRYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes nNO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes R7No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes allo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 36 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 36 acres initially; 36 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 17 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a oo. I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed per code g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 8 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 17 Ultimately 17 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height;g width; length. Per .,code j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? `0— ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubit ya' 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Z]Yes ONo ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intendee purpose is the site being reclaimed? roadway & drainage b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONo C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ONo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes ONo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 6 month 1992 year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase 1 2 month 1 qq2 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes (3No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes $]No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 16 after project is complete n 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes C>3No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes (lNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes E]NO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes !nNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes ($No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes UNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ONo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes nNO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes 2!)No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? • ®Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) rinmentir P1 Prtri tri f-11 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4675 gallons/day. Per SCDOHS 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ®No If Yes, explain 4 11. s • _ c/ 25• Approvals Required: Submittal �% Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes 29No CCity, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑No subdivision City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes I)Io City, County Health Department Eyes ❑No SoDOFIR — Art i rl P VT Other Local Agencies Dyes QdNo Other Regional Agencies ®Yes ❑No planning Cnmmiaainn State Agencies Dyes @No Federal Agencies ❑Yes IJNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit CSsubdivision ❑site plan ❑newfrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? A—C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 17 lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A-0. 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 17 lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ❑No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a I/. mile radius of proposed action? A—C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin inglsurrounding land uses within a '/, mile? @yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? CRYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes KING a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantiS nsor Name enry E. Raynor, Agent Date 4/20/90 Signature Title Agent for Jerome & Cichanowi rz If the action is in the Lastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold: The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision platin accordance with Article 16 of the Town Lav and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town Planning Board, and represents and states as follows: 1. The applicant is the owner of record of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said land under application.) 2. The name of the subdivision is to be . ,major subdivision of Frank A. . . .... . ..... .. . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome . .......... .. .. .... .. .. .. .... ........ . .. .. ..... .. . . .. ... . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... . .. ... . .. .... ... . 3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of deed suggested.) 4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as follows: 75-2-8 Liber . .. 8793,, ,, ,, ,, ,,, , ,, , Page . .. 1?. ... .. . . .. . . .. . On 3(18/80 75-2-9 Liber . .. a46.4.. .... .. ... ... . Page . .. .. .6.. .. .. . . .. . . .. . On 7/.19./.7.$. . . .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . ... . .. . . .. .. .... .... .. . Page . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . On .. . .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. .... ; Liber . .. . . .. .. .. .. ... . .. . . . . . Page . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . O n . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . ; Liber . ... . .. .. .. .. ... . ....... Page . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . ... O n . . . .. .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ; as devised under the Last Will and Testament of . .. . . . . . . .... . . .. . . .... .... . . .. .. .. ... . or as distributee . .. .. .. . . .. .. .... .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. .... ....... . . .. .. . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. ...... ................. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .... .... . 5. The area of the land is .... 36.. .. .....„ acres. total 6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except . . . .. . . .. . . . 7S- . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. ... . . . ... . . .. 7. The land is encumbered by . ...... . . .. .... . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .... .. ...... . . .... . . .. . mortgage (s) as follows: (a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .d.ylO t . . . . Page . .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . in original amount of/ws 1F'eq. .. . unpaid amount $ s . . . . .. . . . held by 7lL . .. . . ...772 -7y ... .. . . .. .. ... address v c'. � e (b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. . . .. . . Pal-e . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . in original amount � . ... held b y . . . .... .. .. .. .. .... .. .of unpaid amount $. .. .. . . .. .... .. .. . . . address . . . .... .. .... ... . . . . . ..,„.. . . . .... . . .. . . .. . . .. r (c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . .. ... ...... Page . .. . . . . .. .... .. . in original amount of ... .. . . .... .. . unpaid amount $. .. ... . . . .. .... . . .. .. . held by . ........ .... ..... .... . .. .. ...... .... .. .. . . . address . .. .. .. .... . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .... 'Z,br�2%-1 'OV.4 8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land except .9is; 2-.9.. .Mo, q. ..... . .. . . ............ .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. .... .. ..... .. .... ........ 9. The land lies in the following zoning use districts . .. ...A—C , , ..... .. ...... . . .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .... . . . ... . . .. ...... .... .... ... . .. .... .. .. ..... ....... . . . 10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex- cept . .... N A. .. ...... .. ... . .. .... .. ... . . .... . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . ... .... .. . .. .. .... . . . . ... . 11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements. 12. The land (d=x) (does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis- trict, if is-trict, if within a District, is . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. . . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . 13. Water mains will be laid by . . . . . .n l a. .. . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 14. Electric lines and standards will be installed by . .. . . LIL.CO . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. .. ... . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said lines. 15. Gas mains will be installed by . .. .. . .n/a.. . . . . .... .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ... ... . .. . . ... . . . . . and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains. 16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Suffolk County I3ighway system, annex Schedule "LB" hereto, to show same. 17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the Town of Southold Ilighway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same. 18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown on the plat. 19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub- division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets. 20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer,pro6f of title as required by Sec. 335 of the Real Prnperty Law. 1 21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots shovnng all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex Schedule "D". 22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will be $, .... .. .. . as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of the Performance Bond be fixed at . .. .. .. .... . .. years. The Performance Bond will be written by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F". DATE ..!?14! .4,(ff.1.. .. ...... 19... . . .. .... .. . . . . . (Name of pli nt) By . ...... .... ... ... . . .. .. .. .... .. ... .. . . .... . . (Signature and Title) . . . .... .. .. .. .. . . .... .. .. .. .. ... . . .. .... ... . ... . (Address) STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . .. .. .... .. . . . . .I ss: On the .. .. .. . . . day of. .. •ci! 114 ..• . •• • • •• • • •, 19. before me personally came . .TH Lt(Y.).A.S. .. .... .. . . to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that . . .he . . . . executed the same. tNDA'J:COUPER' ' ' Notary Public i,.tary Public,State of New York No.4822563,Suffolk Count yy.� Term Expires December 31,191f L STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . ... . ss: On the . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . day . . . . . .. .. . . . Of . . . . . . . . . .... .. 19. .. . . ., before me personally came . . . • . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . to me known, who being by me drily sworn did de- pose and say that . . ,. . . . .. .. . resides at No. . .... . . . . ... . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . .. ... .. .... . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . that . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is the . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . of . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. .. ..... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. . . . . . . ... knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corporation. an(l that . . . . . . . .. . . . signed . .. . . . ... .. .. . name thereto by like order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ... . Notary Public PLANNING BOARD MEMBER RICHARD G.WARD ¢ �� C Town Hall, 53095 Main Road i� � �G P.O. Box 1179 Chairman Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y BENNETT ORLOWSIG,JR. 2 , Fax(516) 765-3136 � WILLIAM J. CREMERS `� ��, Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 24, 1996 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Briarcliff Acres Southold SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed your request in regard to the status of the above mentioned subdivision. The proposed subdivision for Briarcliff Acres received preliminary approval on June 29, 1992. An extension of preliminary approval was granted, which expired on June 29, 1993. The Planning Board has determined that the conditional preliminary approval has expired. New application materials, including an application fee, must be submitted if your client wishes to pursue a subdivision for the subject site. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Siinn�/c,,e�rely, Melissa p o Planner SEP 19 ' + LLl c2 P. 50' . ib sERvxwaTAR HENRY E. RAYNOR PO BOX 1459 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 516-298-8420 516-298 2127 (FAX) SEPT. 19,19516 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RE: CHICH-JEROME SUBDIVISION MAPLE LANE, PECONIC,N.Y DEAR SIRS: AS A RESULT OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY'S DESIRE TO EXPAND PUBLIC WATER IN THE PECONIC AREA: I AM REQUESTING FOR THE APPLICANTS A REACTIVATION OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED SUBDIVISON. THE WATER AUTHORITY WILL BE GRANTED AN EASEMENT TO INSTALL A WELL POINT; AT THE NORTH END OF MAPLE LANE. AS A RESULT THIS SUBDIVSION, AND THE PROPERTIES ALONG ROUTE 25 WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONNECT TO PUBLIC WATER. THIS INSTALLATION WILL ALSO HAVE THE ABILITY TO TIE INTO THE TOWN CONNECTION AT SOUTH HARBOR ROAD. I WOULD REQUEST THE PRESENT STATUS OF THIS SUBDIVISION BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD; AS WELL AS AN OUTLINE OF THE APPROVALS ALREADY GRANTED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER. YOURS TRULY, HENRY E. AYNOR SEP 19 AGENT 7 t 1 K PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �� , ' ,,;�,'..; Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ` - Richard G. Ward Y Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 15; 1992 Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Briarcliff Acres Southold SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 14, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from December 29, 1992 to June 29, 1993 . Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, avrtk l// OA41--Ck- Bennett Orlowski, Jr. rs Chairman AS 32.0 Love Lane Matti Luck , NY 11952 V.TA FAX 765- 1823 November 19 , J992 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road souLhold , NY 11971 RE : Major subdivision of Cicianowicz/,lerome at Maple Avenue , SDuthold , New York ( 75_, -7 & 0 ) Dear Sirs : We hereby request an extensior of the preliminary approval granted for the above reforencod Su ,d vision in order to obtain the necessary Suffolk County Departmen ,t Icak h Service approvals. 5rncore Iy , henry 4 , f.ayn r , Jr . HLR :mI AOV20 '� ; a 'j SOUTHOLD TONIN PLANNING BOARD y ti d 1, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS € SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �F '�`• '" O�r J Richard G. Ward ";' a? y�S Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald �1r�� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 30, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision for Briarcliff Acres Main Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 29, 1992: The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7:35 P.M. , was closed. It was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the maps dated April 16, 1992, for the major subdivision of Briarcliff Acres. Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the date of preliminary approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested, and granted by the Planning Board. Due to the fact that the open space area for the proposed subdivision is viable farmland, the Planning Board will allow you to combine the open space with either Lot 10 or Lot 11, and to indicate a building envelope suitable for a residential dwelling and any accessory structures required for use of the farmland. If you choose this option, the agricultural area must be labeled as an "Agricultural Reserve Easement Area. " This area will be subject to covenants and restrictions imposed by the Planning Board for the purpose of maintaining said premises for continued agricultural production and preventing the degradation or loss of the aesthetic open space values of said premises. The area shall also be managed in accordance with a conservation Briarcliff Acres • • • • June 30, 1992 Page 2 Plan to be developed by the Soil Conservation Service for the Particular property. If you choose the above mentioned option, a Homeowner' s Association will only be required for the road and drainage areas until such time that they are offered for dedication to the Town, should such occur. If you do not choose this option, a Homeowner's Association will be required for all areas in common ownership. The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain adequate land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2,000. 00 per lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval. (Six ( 6) paper copies will be required as part of the final submission. Two ( 2) mylars with a valid stamp of Health Department approval will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) If your client has decided to proceed with the Agricultural Reserve Easement option, the maps must be revised accordingly, and such revision must be accepted by the Planning Board. 2. Final drainage plans and road profiles revised in accordance with the May 26, 1992 Engineering Inspector' s report. (Six ( 6) paper copies are required. ) 3 . A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps, especially if your client decides to proceed with the Agricultural Reserve Easement option. 4. A draft of the By-laws for the Homeowners Association. 5. A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 6. Curb cut approval from the New York State Department of Transportation if such is required for the proposed improvements at the intersection with N.Y.S. Rte. 25. Briarcliff Acres • • June 30, 1992 Page 3 The final hearing will not be scheduled until all of the above items are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, // Q�u� Bennett Orlowski, Jr! �nS Chairman ?2. The property is bordered on the torth by land n• it formerly of 3eorge Stepnos to the east by STATE OF NEW YOhn) LEGAL NOTICE Main Bayview Road,on the south by Notice of Freeman's Lane or Baywater Avenue; )SS. Public Hearing on the west by South Harbor Road,by COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that land now or formerly of Foster, by pursuant to Section 276 of the Town land now or formerly of Montgomery, I Law,a public hearing will be held by by land now or formerly of Fickeis- C Iq'�.1=1 CDN KU'-v of MatthuC In the Southold Town Planning Beard,at aea.and by land now or formerly of ks the Town Hall,Main Road,Southold, Bake. sold County, being duly sworn,says that he/she is Principal New York in said Town on the 29th 7:35 P.M.Preliminary approval for Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper, day of June 1992 on the question of the major subdivision for Briarcliff the following: Acres at Southold,in the Town of published at Mattftuek, in the Town of Southold,County of 7:30 P.M. Final approval for the Southold,County of Suffolk and the Suffolk and State of New York,and that the Notice of which minor subdivision for George Step- State of New York.Suffolk County noski at Southold, in the Town of Tax Map Number.1000-75-2-8&9. the annexed Is a printed Copy,has been regularly published In Southold, County of Suffolk and the The property is bordered on the State of New York. Suffolk County northwest by the Long Island Rail sold Newspaper Once each week for weeks Tax Map Number. 1000-75-4-21 & Road;on the northeast by land now or EUCCeEthlll$ commencingOn the d Of formerly of Nl=dmk and the Town —f- of Southold;on the southeast by land 1 t x✓vim fg7/ now or formerly of John Nierodztk, •,u i by land now or formerly of Tobin,by ?j land now or formerly of Roberta Her- Il ing,by land now or formerly of Janet ! {! /mow L' C t A. Davis, and by Main Road (S.R. I t� 25); and on the south by Maple Avenue,byland now or formerly of Principal(.`lark Barney Ovaianik&Jennie Ovsianik, by land now or formerly of Thomas C. &Jeannette Jerome,by land now or formerly of James G. &Mary K. Brewer,by land now or formerly of Swam to before me this ) Bmsh;on the southwest by land now or formerly of Tobin. day Of /IAM.L- tg Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place specified. LAJKLSMAREIIAIIRISON Dated:June 15,1992 NOT P'n 8b r.Of Ngo Yak BY ORDER OF THE No.52'4605208•Sufkdk County SOUTHOLD TOWN COOt10111"Exphw Aplll 30,197 3 PLANNING BOARD — Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman 7416-ITJulg ! TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- STATE OF NEW YORK ss: EN that pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law,a public hear- ing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the Town Hall, Main Road, Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, Southold, New York in said Town on the 29th day of June a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; 1992, on the question of the and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, following: has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman 7:30 P.M. Final approval for the minor subdivision for once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks George Stepnoski at Southold, ` in the Town of Southold,Coun- successive) �f ty of Suffolk and State of New Y. commencing on the . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-75-4-21 & 22. The property is bordered on the north by land now or formerly of George Stepnoski; ". " " " " • • " " " ' t • • . . • . . . • • . • • • on the east by Main Bayview Road; on the south by Freeman's Lane or Baywater �. Avenue; on the west by South / Harbor Road, by land now or Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . day of formerly of Foster,by land now or formerly of Montgomery,by land now or formerly of ' ' ' ' ' • . • 19 Fickeissen,and by land now or , formerly of Baker. 7:35 p.m. Preliminary ap- proval for the major subdivision for Briarcliff Acres at Southold, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Q in the Town of Southold,Coun- Notary Public ty of Suffolk and the State of BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER New York. Suffolk County Tax NOTARY PUBLIC, St?te of New fork Map Number. 1000-75-2-8&9. No. 4806846 The property is bordered on Qualiiied in Suffolk County the northwest by the Long Commission Expires 8/3J/a;2 Island Rail Road;on the north- east by land now or formerly of Miresdizik and the Town of Southold; on the southeast by land now or formerly of John Nierodzik by land now or formerly of Tobin,by land now or for ngly,o(Roberta Hering, by land now, or formerly of (� (� Janet A. Davis, and by Main ! � L5 lt7"�� IJ E/ Road(S.R.25);and on the south 1! t by Maple Avenue, by land now or formerly of Barney Ovsianik &Jennie Ovsianik,by land now l or formerly of Thomas C. and '� .✓;t.,,._.ii,�, ,.�V..,�___.J I Jeanette Jerome,by land now or8.� a t formerly of James G.&Mary K. � -•----- - Brewer,by land now or former- ly of Brush,on the southwest by land now or formerly of Tobin. Any person desiring to be heard on theabove matter should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: June 15, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. - Chairman 1X-6/18/92(54) E, + <� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y ; '- ,? b SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � '.. ,a'�' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Q�/ui - d •y �� „ Richard G. Ward F ,� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF$0UeW. TLD,992 Fax (516) 765-1823 JunHenry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Briarcliff Acres SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at the meeting held on Monday, June 8, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the engineer' s report dated May 26, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set June 29, 1992 at 7 : 35 P.M. for a preliminary public hearing on the maps dated April 16, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly /vyours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. : Engineer's report F0(k�D - Gc l // RAYMOND L. JACOBS � T JAMES A. RICHTER RINTENDENT OF O ® ENGINEERING WAYS �'Q �OINSPECTOR 3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAY 26 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BRIARCLIFF ACRES (Major Subdivision ) MAIN ROAD, Rte. 25, SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000 - 75 - 02 - 8 & 9 Dear Mr Orlowski : as per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission of maps filed for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows : I . The proposed recharge basin has been rotated 90 degrees so that it lies adjacent to lot # 10. This was done as a requirement of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. As I understand it, it was the Planning Board's intention to have the basin relocated opposite of lot # 10 on the South West side of the parcel . Even though that may create a more uniform open space the grade elevations at that location are higher & would require more excavation. The present proposed site is a low point in the area and in my opinion should be maintained as the location for the recharge basin. 2. The proposed 24 ' wide pavement has been brought to the attention of Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways , for his comment . It is his understanding that a reduction from the Town Code of 28 ' to 24 ' is only allowed under special conditions . This site does not have approvals for the reduction from his office. It is the Planning Boards right to grant this reduction but the Highway Department will not accept 24 ' wide roads for' dedication. If future dedication is ever going to be considered, the pa=,ement must be a minimum of 28 ' wide. If you have any questions concerning this matter , please contact my office. 'incerel RR RR M R James A. Richte A. lillll cc: Raymond L. Jacobs ) 2 6 1992 file SOUTH013 PLRMfn r_ . FOI�-�0� � e�u�3Gic C c 5 RAYMOND L. JACOBS N T JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF O ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��OI raOINSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAY 26 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BRIARCLIFF ACRES (Major Subdivision) MAIN ROAD, Rte. 25, SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000 - 75 - 02 - 8 & 9 Dear Mr Orlowski : as per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission of maps filed for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows: 1 . The proposed recharge basin has been rotated 90 degrees so that it lies adjacent to lot # 10. This was done as a requirement of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. As I understand it, it was the Planning Boards intention to have the basin relocated opposite of lot # 10 on the South West side of the parcel . Even though that may create a more uniform open space the grade elevations at that location are higher & would require more excavation. The present proposed site is a low point in the area and in my opinion should be maintained as the location for the recharge basin. 2. The proposed 24 ' wide pavement has been brought to the attention of Mr. Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways, for his comment. It is his understanding that a reduction from the Town Code of 28 ' to 24 ' is only allowed under special conditions. This site does not have approvals for the reduction from his office. It is the Planning Boards right to grant this reduction but the Highway Department will not accept 24 ' wide roads for dedication. If future dedication is ever going to be considered, the pavement must be a minimum of 28 ' wide. If you have any questions concerning this matter , please contact my office. s 'ncerel i James A. Richt A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs MAY 26 1992 ?:✓ file SOUTHO1;i COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D.. M.P.H. COMMISSIONER May 12, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz #92-010 (a/k/a Briarcliff Acres) , SCTM 1000-75-2-8 and 9 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Your letter of March 26, 1992, addressed to Joseph Baier, has been referred to this office for response. On January 16, 1992, this office received an application for a proposed subdivision of 17 lots to be served by on-site wells. In a notice, dated February 26, 1992, the applicant was notified that wells would not be approved without a letter from Greenport Village stating that water mains could not be extended to the site. Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code requires that proposed subdivisions must be served by public water mains if the mains are available and accessible. The cost of the water main extension is normally borne by the developer. As of this date, no response has been received from either the Village or the applicant regarding the availability of public water. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, Stephen Costa, P. I Associate Public Health Engineer, Chief Office of Water and Wastewater Management SAC:cah ERMNING DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITvWN COUNTY CENTER RDRIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901-3397nY 852-2100 h�o�oSOFFD(,�coGy PLANING BOARD MEMBERS Ai SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. O� Richard G. Ward �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 199' James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for /your review. Application Name: (JripY j4� ttCr�c Tax Map No. : 1000�5 -2 8a9 Street Location: /1�;n Koccd (sx z� Hamlet Location: Sooth�ld Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated X Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated a. Final Subdivision Ma (Dated X Road Profiles (Dated 4- Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminar Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated C nts Rf-I 40m ! /7 mf Contact Person:hp ieSA ,no 1 o � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r� Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �i,'','✓ �` Richard G. Ward 1 ' f Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald �� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 17, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Briarcliff Acres SCTM* 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 16, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the March 9, 1992 Suffolk County Planning Commission report. Numbers 2 and 5 must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. Therefore, the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the final maps. Numbers 1 and 3 must be shown on the preliminary map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. any Chairman Encl. Suffolk County Planning Commission Report cc: Suffolk County Planning Commissign r' • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK* ` ms ROBERT J. GAFFNEY. SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING March 9, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres Northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 4, 1992, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning byZ( Fra owling„, Sr. Planner Subdivision Review Division File: S-SD-92-01 FD:mb Attachment cc: Edward Romaine, County Clerk SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY _ HAUPPAUGE.LI_ NEW YORK 11788 (516) 853-5192 File No. S-SD-92-01 Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on February 5, 1992, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on March 4, 1992, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use: 1. The recharge basin shall be moved so that it is in line with Lot No. 10. This will allow for a uniform open space area. 2. The open space shall be encumbered by an agriculture use easement and placed in the farmland reserve. 3. The access road, Maple Avenue off of Main Road shall be brought up to town specifications and standards. In addition, the width of the pavement within 25 feet of the state road shall be increased to accommodate vehicles entering and leaving the road at the same time. 4. All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow our onto the right-of-way of Main Road, S.R. 25. 5. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 6. Conditions 2 and 5 shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision: Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 S-SD=92-01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 7. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. Motion by: Commissioner Yarusso Seconded by: Commissioner Vahradian Commission Vote: 10 Present - Yeas 9 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated March 4, 1992 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Pv° �° 114Sa�� v ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER April 27, 1992 Bennett Orlowski,Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of Briarcliff Acres SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS)has received your letter dated March 26, 1992, concerning the above-referenced application, and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency.The comments provided below are, therefore,general in nature. The department wishes,however,to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period established for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) 1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems,pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4,5, 6 and 7 of the SCSC. Thus, applicants should not undertake the construction of,or connection to,either system without Health Department approval. 2. Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal. Where applicable,the department regulates the storage, handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous materials pursuan rR2 cVI requirements of Articles 7 & 12 of the SCSC. D 6 15 U k�� I 1992 s souTu`" DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNTY CENTER *�Ni - RIVERHEAD. N.Y. 11901-3397 852-2100 Letter to Town of Southolo • Page 2 3. If an application has not yet been submitted to the SCDHS,one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the technical review of the proposed action. Project designs submitted to the department should be fully consistent with any action currently under review through the SEQRA process. 4. Design and flow specifications, information regarding subsurface soil conditions,water supply information, and complete design details are essential to the review of this project, and are evaluated fully at the time of application review. Should the town require additional environmental information (such as a DEIS, or EAF Part III) discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. 5. Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions, or soils which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems. Your agency should be aware that such conditions frequently require the use of fill or the excavation of subsurface soils to accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of the SCSC. 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply. All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: 1. The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities. It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources, and that all practicable planning measures should be employed to Help ensure their protection. Of particular concern to department is the adequate protection of wetlands, surface waters, natural communities, contiguous natural habitats, and rare,threatened and endangered species. In addition,efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such groundwaters, dunes, bluffs, shorelines, natural drainage channels, groundwater recharge areas, and steep slopes are fully supported and encouraged by the SCDHS. In general, the department encourages the following land use measures be considered(where appropriate)to actions being reviewed pursuant to SEQRA. Letter to Town of Southolo • Page 3 1. Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands, surface waters,clunes, and bluffs 2. Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks 3. Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space 4. Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats, vegetative communities, and unconsolidated soils 5. Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10% 6. Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes 7. Construction of recharge areas, so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site 8. Maximum use of"land-banked' parking on commercial sites 9. Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping 10. Employment of stormwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain runoff on-site The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal. Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period. Should your have any questions, or require additional information,please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. Sincerely, Robert S. DeLuca Sr. Environmental Analyst Office of Ecology cc: Steven Costa,P.E. ------ �HENHy L. HHyN//H J*, u�m tovE LHNE mH /Tl [ULK, 14. Y. liy�� upR1�- 27, 1*9� HE: 8H1ARI.LlFF ACHE.� zOVI@-/b-0r'^8 AmU 9 ENULUSEU HExLW1lH AKE COpIEb (AMENDED) FUR THE PKELlMINHRY SU8DlVlSIUN UF THE Hu/]VE LAPTIUNI�.D PARCEL. PLEASE HUVIsE OF THE NEKT HvVlLABLL D*7E, HND ANY HUDITI[/NAL lNFURMAT}uN NEEDEU, THAwK YOL|^ 0 WIN / i g%3FFOil Cz PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Dye �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 26, 1992 Joseph Baier Suffolk County Dept. of Health 225 Rabro Drive East Hauppauge, New York 11788-4290 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Briarcliff Acres Main Road (S.R. 25) Southold SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Baier: The Planning Board is reviewing the preliminary maps for the above mentioned subdivision proposal. The Board would like to know if the applicant will be required to connect to the existing water supply given the close proximity of this site to the Greenport Village public water supply distribution system. I have enclosed a copy of the preliminary map for your convenience. Please contact this office if you require any additional information. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Encl. cc: Vito Minei t O�OgUFFO(,�-ea PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W t , SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman - �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 76.5-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 18, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Fire well location for Briarcliff Acres SCTM #1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: Enclosed please find a copy of the map indicating the fire well as requested by the Southold Fire Department. Please include this on your final maps. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Very truly yours, ' /7 Bennett Orlowski, J"' ' Chairman his Encl. se T �ti� OT X19,8go � °°e• Oi \ (� \ X 21.7 5 a \ \ URSERY � o QX21.0 Na / \ � e \ 3 10' ID \ x - � o \ � o X24.1 Ile- 4 \M 25.0sk \ s foo � 'j� •' 6� � _ �� yyti� ?�/ c - s /• :z O e 2 a NURSERY p •px 8.9 X26.8 29.6 _ °- .. i qtr'7 ` ,�tir5F� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmanSupervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Jamuary 3� 19 g2 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 R m 15 U V 1 1 , Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for Llu TOM V- 9 7;rNIN BOARDM Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by f"e 1992. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. AS Chairman enc. c:::n - J L LV SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD �n9��OSUFfO(,�c OG o ; PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS A- ,? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman cp Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. � Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald c P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 17, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Briarcliff Acres SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 16, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the March 9, 1992 Suffolk County Planning Commission report. Numbers 2 and 5 must be presented in a Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions in proper legal form. A copy of the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions must be submitted for review by the Planning Board and the Town Attorney. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. Therefore, the draft Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions should be submitted after the Planning Board has reviewed the final maps. Numbers 1 and 3 must be shown on the preliminary map. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very tr�[u�ly yours, � Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �Ay Chairman Encl. Suffolk County Planning Commission Report cc: Suffolk County Planning Commission 4POUNTY OF SUFFOLK �(� S 9 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING March 9, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres Northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 4, 1992, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning by d . Fra owling,,jSr. Planner Subdivision Review Division File: S-SD-92-01 FD:mb Attachment cc: Edward Romaine, County Clerk L� 1 0 :�V2 SOUTHOLDTOWN pLANNING BOARD VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE.LI.. NEW YORK 11788 (516) 853-5192 File No. S-SD-92-01 Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on February 5, 1992, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on March 4, 1992, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use: 1. The recharge basin shall be moved so that it is in line with Lot No. 10. This will allow for a uniform open space area. 2. The open space shall be encumbered by an agriculture use easement and placed in the farmland reserve. 3. The access road, Maple Avenue off of Main Road shall be brought up to town specifications and standards. In addition, the width of the pavement within 25 feet of the state road shall be increased to accommodate vehicles entering and leaving the road at the same time. 4. All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow out onto the right-of-way of Main Road, S.R. 25. 5. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 6. Conditions 2 and 5 shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 S-SD-92-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 7. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. Motion by: Commissioner Yarusso Seconded by: Commissioner Vahradian Commission Vote: 10 Present - Yeas 9 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated March 4, 1992 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission *OUNTY OF SUFFOLK ms (a . ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING March 9, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres Northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York. Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on March 4, 1992, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat, entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" referred to it pursuant to Section A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code. The attached Resolution signifies action taken by the Commission relative to this application. Very truly yours, Arthur H. Kunz Director of Planning V�OxJ4,(t , by Fra owlin , Sr. Planner Subdivision Review Division File: S-SD-92-01 FD:mb Attachment cc: Edward Romaine, County Clerk RROLD TOWN WiFew VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE.L.L. NEW YORK I 1 ABB (516) 853-5192 File No. S-SD-92-01 Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 of Suffolk County Planning Commission Pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of Suffolk County Administrative Code WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections A14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, a referral was received by the Suffolk County Planning Commission on February 5, 1992, with respect to a proposed plat entitled, "Preliminary Plan of Briarcliff Acres" submitted by the Town of Southold Planning Board affecting premises located on the northeasterly side of Main Road, S.R. 25 and the terminus of Maple Avenue in the Town of Southold, New York, and WHEREAS, said referral was considered by the Suffolk County Planning Commission at its meeting on March 4, 1992, and WHEREAS, the Commission has voted to approve with certain changes said referral, Be It Therefore RESOLVED, That the Suffolk County Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the report of its staff as the report of the Commission, Be It Further RESOLVED, That said proposed plat is approved subject to the following conditions deemed necessary for good planning and land use: 1. The recharge basin shall be moved so that it is in line with Lot No. 10. This will allow for a uniform open space area. 2. The open space shall be encumbered by an agriculture use easement and placed in the farmland reserve. 3. The access road, Maple Avenue off of Main Road shall be brought up to town specifications and standards. In addition, the width of the pavement within 25 feet of the state road shall be increased to accommodate vehicles entering and leaving the road at the same time. 4. All stormwater runoff resulting from the development and improvement of this subdivision or any of its lots shall be retained on the site by adequate drainage structures so that it will not flow out onto the right-of-way of Main Road, S.R. 25. 5. Clearing and grading within each lot shall be limited to that necessary for siting and constructing a house with the intent of preserving as much of the natural vegetation on the site as possible, and to minimize stormwater runoff and erosion. 6. Conditions 2 and 5 shall be filed as covenants and restrictions in the office of the County Clerk on or prior to the granting of approval to this subdivision. Resolution No. ZSR-92-36 S-SD-92-01 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such public hearing but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 7. The final map shall bear the following note: A Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions has been filed in the Suffolk County Clerk's office which affects lots in this subdivision. Motion by: Commissioner Yarusso Seconded by: Commissioner Vahradian Commission Vote: 10 Present - Yeas 9 Nays 0 Abstentions 1 Commissioner McDonald Dated March 4, 1992 Hauppauge, New York Suffolk County Planning Commission y o�pgUFFOQ ea PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Qy Richard G. Ward T T '{ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald `� x P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 11, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Briarcliff Acres SCTM#1000-75-2-5 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The enclosed report dated March 9 , 1992, from Suffolk County Planning Commission will be reviewed at the Planning . Board' s March 16, 1992 public meeting. You are not required to attend this meeting. Please note that this report is for your information only. It has not been adopted by the Planning Board. Very truly yours, l�iyvyt,(��d �L �Jfi, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ✓ 'y r Chairman Encl. of 10, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman !�_ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 27, 1992 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Major Subdivision Briarcliff Acres NIS Main Road; off Maple Avenue SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Weber: The Planning Board has reviewed the map the Southold Fire District marked with the proposed location for a firewell for the above mentioned subdivision. The location the Fire District has indicated for the well is not within the land owned by the subdivider. Therefore, the Planning Board can not require that the subdivider install such well. I have returned the marked map for your review. Please indicate if any firewells are needed within the boundaries of the proposed subdivision. Very truly yours, ennoB Chairman �r Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS u, 1 ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ';Yy._y `. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. - Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 1982 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road �I Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by reILI 1992. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �S Chairman enc. nAl I JA SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD X29.2 }�� 31.7,, \ 33. ' 1 / 28.3 i 29_7 X p h �wOO X ti \ :. 29.0 p 130 X� • ��35.3 0 •� 28.0 2 i 56y ID PILES _ 29.2 20 I X X27.4 7.3 Cj 7.80. 27.7 (SEE SEC A ) n CO�N X 25.4 \ a° O XZ SOP • OWNERS FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ ll/ THOMAS Prepared in accordance with the minimum MAPLE AVENUE standards for title surveys as established BUILDING ZONE DISTRICT: A - C SOUTHOLD, 11971 by the L.M.L.S. and approved and adoptedC/O BRIARCLIFF for such use by The New York State Land SCHOOL DISTRICT: 5 MAIN ROAD Title Association PECONFIRE DISTRICT: yg HENRYIE. RC N.AYNORB P. 0. ORA WER A j JAMESPORT, N. Y. 11947 TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres ' j; SLtFBI PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4 y j SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 1 `� `�` n Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall. 53095 Main Road "<�C ter•_ Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25 , 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Briarcliff Acres (Chicanowicz & Jerome) SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 24, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of sketch approval from January 14, 1992 to July 14, 1992. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours �j3/'X-?1.(/t (/4'.I;bNl d�'Gt- T5 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman c 44t_ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS cn r N SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairmana�• -` �'�`�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward = : Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald x `amu P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 25, 1992 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision for Briarcliff Acres Main Road, Southold SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor; The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on February 24, 1992 : BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the February 13 , 1992 report from the Engineering Inspector with the following amendments (numbers correspond to numbers in report) : 1. As written. 2. As written. Curb cut approval will be required prior to the final determination. 3 . The deed to the property includes a right-of-way in common with others 66 feet more or less in width to and from the subject property over Maple Avenue. It is assumed that this is the reason a 67' wide right-of-way in shown on the map. A 50 ' right-of-way with a pavement width built to Town specifications is required. 4, 5 and 6. As written. 7. The subdivision maps have been forwarded to the Fire District for review. Any wells required must be indicated on the final plans. 8. As written. Briarcliff Acres February 25, 1992 Page 2 9. As written. The Board is requiring a street light at the entrance to the subdivision and at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. 10. As written. The preliminary maps must be revised in accordance with the above. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jf. "75 Chairman Enc l. cc: James A. Richter, R.A. �'� i`-' COQ ,"'(5 ✓ or �fl L. JAC035 ' -- rn JA,`fES A. RICHTER �I.%TESDE.,T OF O ENGINEERING C}T,;AyS INSPECTOR 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER 763-3070 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 13, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Briarcliff Acres - Major Subdivision Main Road - Rte. 25 - Southold SCTM # 1000 - 75 - 02 - 8 & 9 3 Dear Mr. Orlowski: ,�, .��__ 3011THOLUTO'ilN fmANNING BOARD As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary Plans & Road Profiles for the above referenced subdivision. The following is a list of my comments: 1. The drainage design & calculations indicated on the Plan have been reviewed and are considered to be adequate for the proposed construction. 2. New York State Curb Cut Permits must be obtained. The increase in width as well as the increase in traffic to & from this Right of Way will require input from the Department of Transportation. 3. The existing Right of Way off of Rte. 25 is approximately 34' wide. As additional 33' has been added to provide for a 67' + wide R.O.W. at the entry to the subdivision. 50' R.O.W. 's are required by the Town. Is there a reason for the extra width? 4. Concrete Survey Monuments should be indicated at all locations 'necessary to define the proposed Right of Way. They should also define the access & limits of the proposed Recharge Basin. 5. The Road Section shows a 6" dimension that appears to be the reveal at the Curb. A mountable curb detail has also been shown. Which detail is correct? Also please note that a 4" crown in the road surface will be sufficient with a 24' wide pavement area. 6. There is a discrepancy between the drawings with reguards to the elevations noted for stations 5+50 & 9+15. The Plan & the Road Profiles do not show the same elevetions. Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. FEBRUARY 13, 1992 Re: Briarcliff Acres - Major Subdivision Page 2 7. Quantities & locations of Fire Wells should be coordinated with the Local Fire Commissioners. 8. Street Trees should be noted and/or shown on the Plan. 9. Street Lights should be noted. Quantities & locations should be coordinated with Planning Board requirements. 10. The Concrete Headwall located at the bottom of the proposed Recharge Basin should be Noted. See Southold Town Highway Specification Drawing # SD-761 for details. If you have any questions concerning this review or if you require any additional information, Please contact my office. Si cerely, James A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs file c�pEFALKC�G� y z PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman VO O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `^ Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 ' caAw2 :v 19`t2 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please Lf-es find ( 2) surveys for �C�of C`t'(F'� f-eS Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by re 1992— Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, A-5 Bennett orlo�ki�Chairman enc. i &L01E \?Ed 0/// /N FEB 20W SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD � �S�fFOIkC • Su�Fc� P�3 -IPNW RAYMOND L. JACOBS t�J� TZ JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF Q `F ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��Ol �yOINSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEBRUARY 13, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 (� Re: Briarcliff Acres - Major Subdivision D " �f Main Road - Rte. 25 - Southold SCTM # 1000 - 75 - 02 - 8 & 9 F6E6 1 4 1%2 Dear Mr. Orlowski: T" As per your request, I have reviewed the preliminary Plans & Road Profiles for the above referenced subdivision. The following is a list of my comments: 1. The drainage design & calculations indicated on the Plan have been reviewed and are considered to be adequate for the proposed construction. 2. New York State Curb Cut Permits must be obtained. The increase in width as well as the increase in traffic to & from this Right of Way will require input from the Department of Transportation. 3. The existing Right of Way off of Rte. 25 is approximately 34' wide. As additional 33' has been added to provide for a 67' + wide R.O.W. at the entry to the subdivision. 50' R.O.W. 's are required by the Town. Is there a reason for the extra width? 4. Concrete Survey Monuments should be indicated at all locations 'necessary to define the proposed Right of Way. They should also define the access & limits of the proposed Recharge Basin. 5. The Road Section shows a 6" dimension that appears to be the reveal at the Curb. A mountable curb detail has also been shown. Which detail is correct? Also please note that a 4" crown in the road surface will be sufficient with a 24' wide pavement area. 6. There is a discrepancy between the drawings with reguards to the elevations noted for stations 5+50 & 9+15. The Plan & the Road Profiles do not show the same elevetions. Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. FEBRUARY 13, 1992 Re: Briarcliff Acres - Major Subdivision Page 2 7. Quantities & locations of Fire Wells should be coordinated with the Local Fire Commissioners. 8. Street Trees should be noted and/or shown on the Plan. 9. Street Lights should be noted. Quantities & locations should be coordinated with Planning Board requirements. 10. The Concrete Headwall located at the bottom of the proposed Recharge Basin should be Noted. See Southold Town Highway Specification Drawing # SD-761 for details. If you have any questions concerning this review or if you require any additional information, Please contact my office. 4ames cerely, 46J �a A. Richter, R.A. cc: Raymond L. Jacobs file d� I PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `O � SCOTT L. HARRIS Q, �,r`. .^ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor P'', �.� 7, George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 'x f Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 I-(!,)Dr unfN1 I , 1972_ Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - l'a 6 LeS Hamlet/Locality S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoningr;��)},;��Ca�serJc� cr (A C� S.C. Tax Map No. : loco - 75 - - � c Major Sub. Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plat ( 3 copies) Road Profiles ( 1) Drainage Plans (1) Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan ( 1) Other materials (specify and give number of copies) Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) (No) . 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C..] Dept of Health. (Yes) (No) . Comme//iIts: N12 r2 o 4 4h1� rnh , � �• �� __ 671 LJrb✓Ir:O.Lc4 -A0, y-T i ff We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (�(No J Referral received 19 by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours,, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. s Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o _^__ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ; `�'- ✓' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �af�t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Ja Ucary 3� 1982 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. i Please reply by re 1992- Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski�� Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennet[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 4>. ' � - 'uhf% Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ? Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald ""'�� `� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Jcwwo,r4 3�, 14q 0— James James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your pnreview. Application Name: � arcl;-t-'c F+c�es Tax Map No. : 1000- Street Location: Hamlet Location: Soutl.,,t A Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated Prelim inary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated 1 / 3 / ?2. ) —7 Gradincr and Drainage Plans (Dated Other Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments: ') eV Contact Person: lel t SS A 1 R i Town Hall, 53095 Main Road o P' `��^ SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179dv 4 Supervisor Southold, New York Fu (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD J0.nuar.l 30 ,1992- Suffolk County Planning Commission H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building -12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 ATT: Charles G. Lind, Chief Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of l rincc.li-- A}creS Hamlet/Locality Sou�(no�c` nn i S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning � A- L S.C. Tax Map No. : MOM-- 75 Major Sub. _Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster_ MATERIAL SUBMITTED: d 117/g2. Preliminary Plat (3 copies)X7Road Profiles ( 1) Xll Drainage Plans (1) Topographical Map (1) Site Plan ( 1) Grading Plan (1) Other Materials (specify and give number of copies) I T)amni us 10 t- is f2Sn(o -�i� q fam7ri N4 ?94TiVe �QC�arati oN Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED i REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is an (Unlisted) (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration) (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3 . E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) 4. The proposed divisicn has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) (No) Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) (No) Referral received lg by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr �nf Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `� f -�" " ? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman N�� 's • " ' "� ^' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald " }' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Frank Cichanowicz and Thomas Jerome SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, take Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. "510S Chairman Encl. G PL ANNING BOARD MEMBERS i w SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman a a A ' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �! Richard G. Ward 4 " Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald • r`z ac . P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Sigttificance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: Dec errber 9, . 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Jerome & Cichanowicz SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 36 + acre parcel into 17 single family residential lots of approximately 1-acre. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 19.6 ± acres of open space to the northern portion of the site. The proposal well also provide required road improvements and drainage. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 075 - Block 02 -Lots 8 & 9 Location: The site is located at the terminus ofunimproved Maple Road, in the hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Major Subdivision-Jerome&Clchanowlcz SEQR Determination Reasons SupportingeThis Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "A-C allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 17 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of one± acre, allowing for the preservation of approximately 19,6 .L acres of open space (281 subdivision). The proposal is to provide a drainage plan that is acceptable to the Planning Board and Town Engineer. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the area does not contain any unique environmental resources. More than half of the site will be preserved through open space and each lot will have natural buffering areas, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Raynor Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 N15 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 January 14, 1992 Southld Town Planning Board Main road Southold, NY 11971 P-r: Proposed major subdivision of Cichanowicz and Jerome at Southold 1000 - 75 - 2 - 8 & 9 Dear Sirs: We hereby request an extensior. of sketc'Z pian approval to continue processing our application with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Since e Henry E. Raynor, Jr HER:m1 II1� E i l TOWNBDARD � HENRY E^ RAYNUR JR. 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N. Y. 1195f.? JAN. 11 , 1992 TO: SVVTHOLD TOWN PLANNIHG BOARD RE: BRl0RCLIFF ACRES (CHICANOWICZ AND JEROME) 75-02-08&09 ENCLOSED HEREWITH ARE ROAD PR0F'ILES AND PFRELIIll.NARY MAPS FOR THE ABOVE CAPTIONED SUBDIVISION. PLEASE ARRANGE FOR THE NECESSARY CIRCU|ATION OF HAPS FnC REVIEW, AND SET FOR 11-IF. [ARLIEST HEARAING DATE. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTlONS, PLEASE. CALL ME AT 298-8420. THANK YOU. .' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS W r h1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �; r! *a w r,` Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ' _ `' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10 , 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Frank Cichanowicz and Thomas Jerome SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, take Lead Agency, and as Lead Agency make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, 1110-z1�: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. W5 Chairman Encl. / O P4ANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmanSupervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward -'' i' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald • � P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Jerome & Cichanowicz SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: Theproject which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 36 .±.acre parcel into 17 single family residential lots of approximately 1-acre. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 19.6 + acres of open space in the northern portion of the site. The proposal will also provide required road improvements and drainage. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 075 - Block 02 -Lots 8 & 9 Location: The site is located at the terminus of unimproved Maple Road, in the hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Major Subdivision -Jerome&Cichanowicz SEQR Determination Reasons SupportingsThis Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "A-C" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 17 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of one ace' allowing for the preservation of approximately 19.6± acres of open space (281 subdivision). The proposal is to provide a drainage plan that is acceptable to the Planning Board and Town Engineer. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the area does not contain any unique environmental resources. More than half of the site will be preserved through open space and each lot will have natural buffering areas, thereby mimmizing sigmficant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-De artment of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Raynor Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 11CRAMER, VR OCIA�S Pe) ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS October 10, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board ' w I Town Hall, 53095 Main Road D P.O. Box 1179 Z 5 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Review of EAF Major Subdivision of Jerome & Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-075-2- 8 & 9 Dear Benny: As per the your request of September 24, 1991, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. The project represents a low intensity use of land, and the use of clustering is effective in retaining open space and protecting the site's environmental resources. Inspection of the site finds the following. The majority of the site is an active nursery. There are structures extant in the southeast portions of the property, including a house, a building, gas pump, barn, and two sheds. The other areas contains some deciduous vegetation, and overgrowth areas. The site is dominated by nursery stock plants. During field investigation of the site no unique natural resources were observed. The proposed cluster subdivision preserves more than half the site in open space and natural buffer areas on each lot. In addition, the cluster subdivision minimizes the amount of road surface and therefore reduces the amount of impervious surfaces. The sketchplan does not provide any drainage plans for the proposed subdivision, a number of drainage options are available for use on this site. Before approving the preliminary subdivision map the extent of additional clearing for the drainage areas and design should be further reviewed by the Planning Board in conjunction with the Town Engineer. Provided the drainage plan does not involve extensive alteration of Page 1 of 2 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 mess P. 117.l Jerome&Cichanowicz Major Subdivision Long EAF Review the site we do not anticipate significant impact to the site's natural environmental resources. We feel that the proposed cluster concept for the Jerome & Cichanowicz subdivision demonstrates the effectiveness of clustering land which is zoned under a 2-acre density category. Open space can be effectively preserved, in harmony with a subdivision which has lots of substantial size permitting adequate building setbacks within the subdivision. The ultimate development would benefit greatly from landscaping of setback areas and planting of street trees, as the majority of development will occur in areas presently used for agriculture. This type of subdivision design should be encouraged, and as a result we feel comfortable recommending a Negative Declaration based upon this review, and the reasons outlined in the accompanying Determination of Significance. If the Board feels that the drainage issues should be addressed prior to issuance of the Negative Declaration, the determination could simply be held until such time as this issue is resolved. I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to complete review of this project. We would be pleased to provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very tVVoorhis, es J AICP enc: Part I/II LEAF Determination of Significance CRAMER, VSOCIATES Page 2 of 2 ENVIRONMENT _ G CONSULTANTS SEQR NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Jerome & Cichanowicz SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 36±acre parcel into 17 single family residential lots of approximately 1-acre. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 19.6±acres of open space in the northern portion of the site. The proposal will also provide.required road improvements and drainage. SCI%Number: District 1000- Section 075 - Block 02 -Lots 8 & 9 Location: The site is located at the terminus of unimproved Maple Road, in the hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 Major Subdivision-Jerome&Cichanowicz SEQR Determination Reasons Supportingilbis Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "A-C' allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 17 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of one±acre, allowing for the preservation of approximately 19.6± acres of open space (281 subdivision). The proposal is to provide a drainage plan that is acceptable to the Planning Board and Town Engineer. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the area does not contain any unique environmental resources. More than half of the site will be preserved through open space and each lot will have natural buffering areas, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. 2) The proposed pro ect conforms to the density standards for single family residential devel; nentestIIshped by the Suffolk County DepartmentoHealth Servicesin orderoprotectoundwater. The projectisconsistentwith groundwatermanaement guidelines asoutlined in the 208 Study, SCSanitaryCode Article 6, and consiered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Henry Raynor Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Judith Terry, Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 117.21 • SEQR Appendix A tate Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action maybe significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addiRon, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: , Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: I'a Part 1 2� Part _ ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. O B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a. significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Major subdivison of Jerome & Cichanowicz Name of Action O t,rr Name of Lead Agency :002 5 1991 Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency T_::itle of I son RD =Signatureotfficer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsibleoi(icer) C? IoI -II Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor • NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effc on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considert as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol% new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAME O ACTION ` Ma 'or subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address. Municipality and County) Ma le Avenue, Southold, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Henr E. Ra—- Jr. 616 )298-8420 ADDRESS P. O. Drawer A CITY/PO STATE CODE James ort, TA LZIP NAME OF OWNER(It119I tlillerent) 47 BUSINESS TELEPNE Frank A. Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome t ADgqRESS C/o Briarcliff, Main Road Mple Avenue CITY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Peconic, NY 11958 Southold, NY 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION major subdivision of 36 acres �,tvtc� CL CwST� R r -.IC, tI Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential(suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm ❑Forest IRAgriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 36 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) _ 36 acres 17 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces ores ----_ acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topsoil, loam sand Oq ,,fj c) n Ie5 a. Soil drainage: XDWell drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained of site❑Poorly drained "o of site µeJ I )A A b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through -i of the NY� Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes RNo '- a What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 Approximate percentage or proposed ect site with slopes: NO-10% 1.QAk 90 010-1590 o 015°b or grca °o 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes f3No f '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes ffNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? + 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes SNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes nNO 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ®No According to on information and belief Identify each species T--IcLD /NSF'LGr/cyy - C f/ 12. Are theresany unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Oyes 0No Describe F'/N L-1_) 5;`'rrG7_i0N C;V/-4 1.. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes h7No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? _ Dyes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: . N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: n/a a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Uyes ONo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? QYes ONo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes nNO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes QNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?- Dyes allo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 36 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 36 acres initially; 3_ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped 17 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: -II A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a 4u; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed 7 per code g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 8 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential. Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 17 Ultimately 17 i. Dimensions fin feet) of largest proposed structure J _ height: — width; length. per code I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? —_ ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i e., k, earth, etc.) will be removed from te? 0 tons/cubic va, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimep )t7Yes ONO ❑N/A o t a. If yes, for what intendce purpose is the site being reclaimed? roadway & drainage b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated I (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 6 month 1992 year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase 1 2 month 1 992 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes [3No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Oyes EINo 9. Nuler of jobs generated: during construction 16 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes [�No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes &�No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes I No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ❑No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes LNNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ®Yes )ONO c. If yes, give name '_�k +FtoLD LA>5£ P I 1 I ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONO e. If Yes, explain lAT3lF- iV1AT�_t' iA !`-, — (�<FP�-2 )vje rXv L TC 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes JKNO a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes ONO 19. Will project.routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes nNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes e9No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? • ®Yes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) r9nmaatic el er•tri ci ty 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallonsiminute. Per SCDOHS 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4675 gallons/day. 24 Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes ONO If Yes, explain 4 I r — 'c/25. Approvals Required: Submittal V- Type Date. / City, Town, Village Board Dyes ©No CCity, Town. Village Planning Board ®Yes ONO subdivision City, Town Zoning Board Dyes DNo City, County Health Department ®Yes ONO gCDQHq — Art-irle VT Other Local Agencies Dyes QNo Other Regional Agencies ®Yes ONO planning rnmmiscian State Agencies ❑Yes I.QNo Federal Agencies ❑Yes (nNO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? OYes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: (honing amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit LQsubdivision Osite plan ❑neswlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A—C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 17 lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A—C 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 17 lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ON( 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a Y. mile radius of proposed action? A C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoiningisurrounding land uses within a V mile? U))'es ❑Nc 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®Nc 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? Wes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? g]Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be anv adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate o: avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantlSK nsor Name HenryE. Raynor, Agent Date 4/20/90 Signature C " hL-W (TC 10 Title Agent for Jerome & C'ichanowicz If the action is in theLastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceedin;t with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PRACT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAOITUDE Responsibility of Lea4 Agerscy General information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and atterminations been reammablel The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples andlor lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is laver than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderate impact also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to POtentlal Can Impact Be Moderato Large Mltlgated By IMPACT ON LAND --- - Irnpact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ANO SM Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. C1 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within O ❑ ❑Yes ONo 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. O ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ OYes ONo • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONo 2. Will there bean effect h• —iy unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(r e., ;Iiffs dupes, geological formatiops c1c.j�NO OYks di. k land forms r Z 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Gunge (Under Articles 1S. 21,2S of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ICNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Cl 0 ❑Yes CNo • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ OYes ONO protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. O O Oyes ONO • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. O O Oyes ONO • Other impacts: 0 ❑ OYes ONO 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water 0 ❑ OYes ONO or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. 0 0 OYes ONO • Other impacts: 0 0 Dyes ONO S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO OYES Examples that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. 0 0 OYes ONO • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not 0 - O Dyes No have approval to serve proposed(project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 15 ❑ O OYes ONO gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water 0 0 Dyes ONO supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. 0 0 OYes ONO • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities wh.,h presently 0 ❑ CYes ONo do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per 0 0 OYes ONO day. • Proposed Action will likel•• cau>e siltation or other discharge into an 0 O OYes E:No existing body of water tv &,, esient that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical 0 O OYes ONO products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water 0 0 OYes ONO and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may O 0 OYes ONO require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: 0 O Oyes ONO Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water wnoffI- ONO °. .OYES . u npfb efiat°riould.aPDIY to e0lunili 3 __ + dyeDNa Proposed! /ktioo.would change flood wattr flows_ - O.. 0' s . 12 J Small to Polentlal Can Impact :t Be I Moderate Large Mltlpated d B Impact Impact Project Chanange • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes _ JNo • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes _JNo • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes -=No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes _0 N IMPACT ON AIR 1 7. Will proposed action affect air qualityt Jift OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes _ JNo hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes _ JNo refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ Oyes ::)No l heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. {, • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes JNc development within existing industrial%reas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes :D NC IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? IdNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York at Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 'JNc list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes JNe • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes JNc than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: O ❑ ❑Yes —INC 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? 11140 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? )�NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ne laryd flncludes.croplandhayfields, pasture..viney�rd, oiFF4(d.:etc.) :.: t 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping} or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? jYNO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix S.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project compoAents obviously different from ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Ow IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structureofhistoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑Nt+ project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 P6 OYES { )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO `S A major reduction of an opert ;pace. important to the community.. . O Q._ Oyes �No , e,.•Othe.'rr+2 � IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be I 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation syste sl Moderate Urge Mitigated By ,1NO OYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods ❑ ❑ ❑Yes CNo • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts. O ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sourlgqs of fuel or energy supply? JSNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No � any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action vrill require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? gNO OYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO `. • Proposed Action will produce operating Boise exceeding the local 0 _ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO noise screen: • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? WNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ O ❑Yes ONO substances(i.e. oil, pesticides,chemicals,radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ O ❑Yes ONO gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous j waste— ts. Q . ❑ QYes ❑tJo IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 3 OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potentlal Gn Impact Be Modest• Large Mitigated By to Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change I'NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes CNo project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ oyes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. 0 ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? 9NO DYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be rnifigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changdsl 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) i, �y oJrti3l,yr PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ' xh ,, SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman '� � Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD "Fax (516) 765-1823 October 1, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Frank Chicanowicz & Thomas Jerome SCTM#1000-75-2-5 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 30, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a retroactive six month extension of sketch approval from July 14, 1991 to January 14, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. (/ /MS Chairman f�pG14 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ; 'J Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 24, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Major Subdivision Frank Cichanowicz and Thomas Jerome Maple Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $400.00 review fee from the applicant. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. -, MS APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L.HARRIS > x Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman "> h Charles Grigonis,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board Attention: Melissa Spiro FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals ' DATE: February 20, 1990 SUBJECT: 280-A Access Update to 1000-75-2-8, 9 & 10 Your File Ref: Major Subdivision of Cichanowicz This memorandum will confirm that the Board of Appeals, at its Special Meeting held January 11, 1991, authorized a conditional waiver from the filing of an additional variance, to update "Maple Avenue," and required that the private roadway be updated subject to the following PROVISO: That the roadway be constructed in accordance with the specifications for a major subdivision as provided in the Town Code and as adopted and accepted by the Town Planning Board in its review and processing of the subject major subdivision application. This waiver with conditions is granted only because of the previous history of this private road known as Maple Avenue with the Board of Appeals under the 1980 application for access approval in a prior minor subdivision (your file reference: Gajeski) . lk f APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer, Chairman Charles Gri zonis,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 February 12, 1991 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Update for 280-A Access Approval to 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Board Members have considered your recent letter, in which you have indicated that the property owner/developer is proposing to reconstruct Maple Avenue to conform with the Planning Board requirements and specifications for a standard 50-foot wide roadway. Upon researching our records, we find that there was an access approval granted under Appl. No. 2719 on August 14 , 1980 over the subject private road referred to as "Maple Avenue. " In this event, the Board of Appeals at its Special Meeting held Friday, January 11, 1991 , authorized a conditional waiver from the filing of a variance to update "Maple Avenue, " PROVIDED that the roadway is constructed in accordance with the specifications for a major subdivision roadway as accepted and adopted by the Planning Board in its review and processing of the subject major subdivision application. This waiver is granted only because of the previous history of this "Maple Avenue" with the Board of Appeals in the 1980 application for access approval in a prior minor subdivision. A copy of this letter is being furnished to the Planning Board Chairman for their file concerning the pending major subdivision application. Very true y-ypurs, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER�/ lk CHAIRMAN cc: Southold Town Planning Board MR. CHAIRMAN: I ' 1 ake a motion to approve Lk access. MEMBER TUTHILL: Ok. I' ll second your motion to approve the access. MR. CHAIRMAN: The motion has been made and seconded to approve the access. MEMBER DOUGLASS : And make sure you say Maple Lane-- MR. LARK: Maple Avenue. MEMP.ER DOUGLASS: Maple Avenue. After investigation and personal inspection of the premises, the Board finds that applicant purchased two parcels of land located on the west side of Maple Avenue (Private Road No. 7) , Southold, which became merged as one parcel when the properties were conveyed into the same ownership. Proposed Lot No. 1 will have 38, 582 square feet of area and 66 .50 feet in width, and has an existing C barn. Proposed Lot No. 2 will have 25, 087 square feet of \J area and 150 feet in width, and has an existing two-story Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- August 14, 1980 �j farm house, two sheds, and a garage. Also, the access road, known as "Maple Avenue" , has been preexisting of zoning, is approximately 68.81 feet wide, and is suitably improved for egress and ingress to the subject parcels. The Board agrees with the reasonings of applicant. CThe Board finds the circumstances present in this case unique, and strict application of the ordinance would pro- duce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Tuthill, it was RESOLVED, that Joseph GaJeski, by Richard F. Lark, Esq. , Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935, be granted Variances to : (a) the zoning Ordinance, Article III , Section 100-31 approving the insufficient area of two prcposed parcels as applied for, to wit, 38 , 582 and 25, 087 square feet, and approving the insufficient width of Lct 1 as applied for, to wit, 66 . 50 feet; and (b) New York Town Law, Section 280-A approving the access, as applied for, in Appeal No. 2719 dated July 11, 1980, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDI-TIONS: - (1) That applicant obtain approval from the Southold Town Planning Board concerning the division of this property; (2) That no structures be built within 170 feet from Maple Avenue into "Lot No. 2 . " Location of property: Maple Avenue (Private Road No. 7) , Southold, New York; bounded north by Cichanowicz, east by Maple Avenue, south by Jerome, west by Tobin; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-75-2-7 and 17. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Tuthill, Douglass and Goehringer. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2720 . Application of John Kromer, 6 Kim Avenue, Smithtown, New Ycrk, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for Permiss;n., J� w PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS p _ 'T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y�� i ;�p Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the Lead Agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated November 1, 1990, submitted January 2, 1990, with the following conditions: 1. Lot 2 is to be revised so that it is at least 125 feet in width at the building setback line. 2. Access, either by ownership or 280A approval, must be obtained. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Page 2 Jerome and Cichanowicz Upon submission of the preliminary maps, the Planning Board will refer this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly -y`yours, ins Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ¢j61 (2187)-7c 617.21 Appendix A SECIR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: , Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project . data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: O Part 1 ❑ Part 2 []Part 3 CUpon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Major subdivison of Jerome & Cichanowicz Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparerfif different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART RT 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invok new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specs: each instance. P OF ACTION or subdivision of Jome and Cichanowicz ION OF ACTION (Incluoe street Address,Municipality and County) le Avenue, Southold, New York OF APPLICANT/SPONSORr E. Ra ROr, JrBUSINESS TELEPHONE SS b16 1298-8420 P. O. Drawer A CITY/PO James ort, STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) NY 11947 f ank A. Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome BUSINESS TELEPHONE RESSo Briarcliff, Main Road Mple Avenue IPOconic, NY 11958 Southold, NY 11971sTATE ZIP CODE CRIPTION OF ACTION jor subdivision of 36 acres f t Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm ❑Forest (MAgriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 36 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) _ 36 acres 17 Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topSOil, loam sand a. Soil drainage: UWell drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately Well drained 40 of site ❑Poorly drained °o of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified Within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes No R --- a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 120-10% 100 % 1310-15% 1315% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National 3 Registers of Historic Places? Dyes MNo f '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes (fNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? + 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes 29No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes nNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ®No According to on information and belief Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes ZlNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes KlNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? _ Dyes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: n/a a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Eyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [jYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes nNO 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes UNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes allo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 36 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 36 acres initially; 36 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 17 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n /.l (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a off. I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed per code g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 8 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 17 Ultimately 17 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. per ..code j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 7._ ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site.? 0 tons/cubic yy 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? zlYes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intender purpose is the site being reclaimed? _ roadway & drainage b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed b this Dyes RINo Y project? 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated — 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 6 month 1992 year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase ;) month 1 9g2 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes C3No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes E1No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 16 after project is complete n 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes QNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes lZNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes E]No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes InNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes 13N 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes INNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes E]No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes E�No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes nNO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes 29No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? • ®Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) c9ameSt-i c el enFri ri hs 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4675 gallons/day. Per SCDOHS 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ®No If Yes, explain 4 c/25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ENO CCity, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ONO subdivision �1 City, Town Zoning Board OYes E]No City, County Health Department Eyes ONO S(1n0Hg — Art i r 1 P VT Other Local Agencies OYes 5:1�o Other Regional Agencies ®Yes ONO otannina C'nmmission State Agencies OYes Ix No Federal Agencies OYes InNO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑x Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit Qsubdivision Osite plan ❑nese/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A—C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 17 lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A—(' 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 17 lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑Nc 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? A—C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? Ryes ❑Nc 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes ®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? EkYes ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes ®No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which VOL] propose to mitigate o: avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SRnsor Name HenryE. Raynor, Agent Date 4/20/90 Signature Title Agent for Jerome & Ci chanowicz If fhe action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with this assessment. 5 Nj S p � 9w r ! 2 31991 L� SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER BOARD SENDER: SUBJECT: t K SCTM# : COMMENTS: 14 goo. orri ehc\cse 1 /r 1 l .__ l rr� I�� .�.R"�� 'elw'Yr"4}�yi�.f0 _.- __ f�S 320 Love Lane Mattituck , NY 11952 September 9 , 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold , NY 11971 RE : Major subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Sirs : We hereby request an extension to complete the preliminary subdivision plans for submission to your Board with regard to the above referenced . Sincerel , �I ,P . henr Ra nor , Jr . hER:ml VIA FAX 765-1823 9116 �9 P EA F /fir e, r VPLANNINGBOARD P 1 0 1991 1 J THOLD TOWN TOTAL P. 01 tiFru PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman _ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. - Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 1, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of June 18, 1991 in reference to the above mentioned subdivision. In correspondence dated August 27, 1991, the Planning Board asked your client to provide a tap street to the adjoining parcel to the west. The Board requires tap streets wherever needed in all proposed subdivisions in order to provide adequate road access and traffic circulation. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, I/I Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ms Chairman Jull 1 '11 14: Lo �.., �• 1 SU.B�KJ MS TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD JUNE 18, 1991 FROM: HENRY RAYNOR RE: MAJOR SUBDIVISION OF THOMAS JEROME AND PRANK CHICHANOWICZ NORTH SIDE MAPLE LANE, PECONIC. N. Y. GENTLEMEN: PLEASE BE ADVISED THE APP'.ICANTS ARE REQUESTING THE PLANNING BOARD TO ELIMINATE THE SPUR ROADWAY PROPOSED BY. THE BOrRD TO THE WESTERLEY PROPERTY LINE. IT IS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANTS TO LEAVE A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF THE PROPERTY IN TREE AND SHRUB PLANTINGS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS ROADWAY IS NOT NECESSARY TO KEEP THE CONFIGURATION OF LOTS IN A CLUSTER LAYOUT. FOR THE ABOVE REASONS, I WOULD ASK THIS ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION, ■ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Y✓ .�- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward = t,, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 February 26, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Cichanowicz and Jerome SCTM#1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 25, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on January 14, 1991, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. s Chairman f h�O�Og1dFF0J/( APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS o SCOTT L.HARRIS COD x Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman Charles Grigonis,Jr. Oj �`a� Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516)765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Southold Town Planning Board Attention: Melissa Spiro FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals �K DATE: February 20, 1990 SUBJECT: 280-A Access Update to 1000-75-2-8, 9 & 10 Your File Ref: Major Subdivision of Cichanowicz This memorandum will confirm that the Board of Appeals, at its Special Meeting held January 11, 1991, authorized a conditional waiver from the filing of an additional variance, to update "Maple Avenue," and required that the private roadway be updated subject to the following PROVISO: That the roadway be constructed in accordance with the specifications for a major subdivision as provided in the Town Code and as adopted and accepted by the Town Planning Board in its review and processing of the subject major subdivision application. This waiver with conditions is granted only because of the previous history of this private road known as Maple Avenue with the Board of Appeals under the 1980 application for access approval in a prior minor subdivision (your file reference: Gajeski) . lk FEB 2 01991 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS s SCOTT L.HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P.Goehringer,Chairman Charles Grigonis,Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. P.O.Box 1179 James Dinizio, Jr. Southold,New York 11971 Robert A. Villa BOARD OF APPEALS Fax(516)765-1823 Telephone(516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone(516)765-1800 February 12, 1991 Mr. Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Update for 280-A Access Approval to 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Board Members have considered your recent letter, in which p you have indicated that the property owner/developer is proposing to reconstruct Maple Avenue to conform with the n Planning Board requirements and specifications for a standard Y 50-foot wide roadway. Upon researching our records, we find that there was an access LJ approval granted under Appl. No. 2719 on August 14, 1980 over / the subject private road referred to as "Maple Avenue. " In this event, the Board of Appeals at its Special Meeting held Friday, January 11, 1991, authorized a conditional waiver from the filing of a variance to update "Maple Avenue," PROVIDED that the roadway is constructed in accordance with the specifications for a major subdivision roadway as accepted and adopted by the Planning Board in its review and processing of the subject major subdivision application. This waiver is granted only because of the previous history of this "Maple Avenue" with the Board of Appeals in the 1980 application for access approval in a prior minor subdivision. A copy of this letter is being furnished to the Planning Board Chairman for their file concerning the pending major subdivision application. Very tru�y..ypurs, GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk cc: Southold Town Planning Board MR. CHAIRMAN: I' ll make a motion to approve the c access. ( f_ MEMBER TUTHILL: Ok. I 'll second your motion to �b1 approve the access. MR. CHAIRMAN: The motion has been made and seconded to approve the access. MEMBER DOUGLASS : And make sure you say Maple Lane-- MR. LARK: Maple Avenue. MEMEER DOUGLASS: Maple Avenue. After investigation and personal inspection of the premises, the Board finds that applicant purchased two parcels of land located on the west side of Maple Avenue (Private Road No. 7) , Southold, which became merged as one parcel when the properties were conveyed into the same ownership. Proposed Lot No. 1 will have 38, 582 square feet of area and 66 .50 feet in width, and has an existing C barn. Proposed Lot No. 2 will have 25,087 square feet of area and 150 feet in width, and has an existing two-story Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- August 14, 1980 farm house, two sheds, and a garage. Also, the access road, known as "Maple Avenue" , has been preexisting of zoning, is approximately 68 . 81 feet wide, and is suitably improved for egress and ingress to the subject parcels. The Board agrees with the reasonings of applicant. CThe Board finds the circumstances present in this case unique, and strict application of the ordinance would pro- duce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship. The Board believes that the granting of a variance in this case will not change the character of the neighborhood and will observe the spirit of the ordinance. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Tuthill, it was RESOLVED, that Joseph Gaaj2ski, by Richard F. Lark, Esq. , Main Road, Cutchogue, New York 11935, be granted Variances to: (a) the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 approving the insufficient area of two proposed parcels as applied for, to wit, 38, 582 and 25, 087 square feet, and approving the insufficient width cf Lct 1 as applied for, to wit, 66 . 50 feet; and (b) New York Town Law, Section 280-A approving the access, as applied for, in Appeal No. 2719 dated July 11, 1980, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDI- TIONS: - (1) That applicant obtain approval from the Southold Town Planning Board concerning the division of this property; (2) That no structures be built within 170 feet from Maple Avenue into "Lot No. 2. " Location of property: Maple Avenue (Private Road No. 7) , Southold, New York; bounded north by Cichanowicz, east by Maple Avenue, south by Jerome, west by Tobin; County Tax Map Item No. 1000-75-2-7 and 17. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Grigonis, Doyen, Tuthill, Douglass and Goehringer. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2720 . Application of John Kramer, 6 Kim Avenue, Smithtown, New Ycxk, for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for Permission to construct ono-Fermi lv AW=1 l inn PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS < SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �✓�i - >'?!` ' o�. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ,`O Richard G. Ward r' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Ross: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the Lead Agency coordination process on this unlisted action. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated November 1, 1990, submitted January 2, 1990, with the following conditions: 1 . Lot 2 is to be revised so that it is at least 125 feet in width at the building setback line. 2. Access, either by ownership or 280A approval, must be obtained. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Page 2 Jerome and Cichanowicz Upon submission of the preliminary maps, the Planning Board will refer this subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission for their review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 'yN S Chairman �u�BFic,E ME 320 Love-,L4ne Mattituck, NY 11952 January 23 , 1991 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Major subdivision of Cichanowicz and Jerome at Southold 1000- "i j- - <61 DOar Sirs: Please find enclosed six prints of the revised subdivision plan for the above referenced , as per your request . Sincerely, Henry Rayn r , J HER:ml Enc . .O? g 1991 P� r�5 320 Love Lane Mattituck , NY 11952 January 15 , 1991 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Main Road Southold , NY 11971 RE : Major subdivison of Jerome and Cichanowicz at Peconic 1000-75-2-8&9 Dear Mr . Geoghringer : Enclosed please find three copies of the sketch map of the above captioned subdivision . My clients are desirous of developing this 35 . 7 acre parcel into a 17 lot subdivision north of Maple Avenue , a private road on the north side of New York State Route 25 , Peconic . I would request the right-of-way be reviewed by your Board for the right of access under Section 280A . I would also request a waiver of a formal application on this parcel as the Board has already reviewed this matter during the 1980 ' s and allowed others the use of same . We fully understand that road construction will be to the specifications of the Planning Board . Should you have any questions , please don ' t hesitate to contact me at 298-8420 . Sincerely , ry i eRayno , Jr . HER :ml CC : Frank Cichanowicz Thomas Jerome Southold Town Planning Boa �oS�r-VOL �4"�z'f'� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y 'Yy ti Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. OH '�� ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward „ - Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 �ctnuatr�t �`�� 1991,. RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Frank CtSyNdTTOW \G-Z ccnt. -,)Nomas Seru...le- SCIC-m -*- 75-2.- P a9 Requested Action: TeSi"-ceQ , t�Cs�tsry of 17 (a+s c” 3S.7+Qz'1. ceuer, SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I nn( X ) Unlisted nn"-, Contact Person: "�lSSA SPt� ( 516) -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (� ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, �s Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: 4Board of Appeals T..0 !Aing' nQ 'JY%Tl1Tk Southold Town Board *Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services wNYSDEC - Stony Brook Albany S C nept of pill-0 ^ u'^ ks U S Army _Corp of: VagiaQezz. N V O Tl..pt QF * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies 14�-627)-7c – 617.21 Appendix A SEAR State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a projector action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: , Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: O Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Major Subdivison of Jerome & Cichanowicz Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer ( Signature of Responsible Of in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) Date 1 < PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considerc as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invok new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and speci; each instance. NAME OF ACTION Ma 'or subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz LOCATION OF ACTION(Include street Address,Municipality and County) Ma le Avenue, Southold, New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR Henr E. Ra nor, Jr. BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS b16 )298-8420 P. O. Drawer A CITY/Po James ort, STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(It different) NY 11947 Frank A. Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADPRESS ( ) c/o Briarcliff, Main Road Mple Avenue Peconic, NY 11958 Southold, NY 11971 STATE I ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION major subdivision of 36 acres L Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm. ❑Forest MAgriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 36 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) _ 36 acres 17 Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (indicate typeL acres acres acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? topsoil, loam sand a. Soil drainage: Ur Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained 0 e of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY� Land Classification Systems acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes RNo -" r a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ®0-10% 100 % C110-1 5% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National 3 Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes [2No � '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ffNo B. What is the depth of the water table? + 40 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes PSNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes MNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ®No According to on information and belief Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes F)No Describe • 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ZlNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? _ ❑Yes ®No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: n/a a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? *Dyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 5JYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes 63No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes :UNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 1RNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 36 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 36 acres initially; 36 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 17 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: n 1A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion {proposed n/a ?I I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed per Code g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 8 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential. Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 17 Ultimately 17 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. per .code I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _— ft. 3 N � 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 ` tans/cubit yar 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ZlYes ❑No ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? _ roadway 6 drainage b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes @No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 6 month 1992 year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase 12 month 1 gg7 year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ON 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes IKINo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 16 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes 12No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes ®No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes IJNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ❑Pdo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes E3No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes UNo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ❑No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ONo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes nNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes 29NO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? • ®Yes ❑No If yes , indicate type(s) dOMPRt i r a1 arm ri t)' 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4675 gallons/daper SCDOHS ! y. C 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes ®No If Yes, explain 4 1 - C 2t5• Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ®No CCity, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑No subdivision City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes EIlo City, County Health Department ®Yes ❑No crrinrac _ Art; cl PVT Other Local Agencies ❑Yes QdNo Other Regional Agencies ®Yes ❑No Planning f norm; gg; nn State Agencies ❑Yes IRNo Federal Agencies ❑Yes IJNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit [$subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? A—C 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 17 lots 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? A—C 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 17 lots C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ❑Nc 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/. mile radius of proposed action? A—C 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/. mile? 2Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 17 a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? 13Yes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ®Yes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes KlNo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be anv adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ( Applicant/S nsor Name Henr E. Raynor, Agent Date 4/20/90 CSignature U"" �1 Title Agent for Jerome & Ci chanowicz If the action is in the oastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with this assessment. 5 ' � 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward . 4 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 14, 1991 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Cichanowicz/Jerome SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Long Environmental Assessment Forms. The above mentioned sum must be paid in full by your clients before we can authorize our consultant to proceed with the review. The check should be made payable to the Town of Southold. When the consultants complete their review, the Planning Board will consider their findings in making a determination of whether the project will have a significant environmental impact. Very truly yours, eove'Z.� /-'M Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 5 Chairman -w~. ' -~ DEC. 31, 1900 ! O: SOUTHO"U TOWN PLANNiN6 8UARD FROM : HENRY RAYNOR RE: CHICHANOWICZ-JEHDME SUBDIVISION 1000-075-02-889 ENCLOSED HEREWITH ARE THE REVISED COPIES OF THE PROPOSED SKETCH MAPS. PEN YOUR HEAuEST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATlON HAVE BLEN ADDED: ALL LhT wlUTHS ARE AT A MINlMUM OF l25` . CREAliON OF B /a' BUFFER ZONE AT THE REAR OF INDICATED LOTS. OPEN SPACE AREA INDICATED AT THE CUL DE SAC. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE CONSlRUCTlON WIDTH WILL BE 24' OF THE PxOPUSEO Rd8U FOR THIS 6UbUlVlbiON. PLEASL M? THIS MAP FOR SKETCH PLAN APPRUVAu AT YOUR EHRLlEST MEETING. UNDER SEPARATE COVER COPY OF 280A REQUEST HAS BEEN FAXED TO YOUR OFFICE, FOR YOUR INFORMATION, SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONB, PLEASE CALL AT 298-8420. THANK YOU, � HENRY » RY RAYN� , / " \ FOR THE APPLICANTS iN ~ } G� ~^ ^ 1 C yt5 320 Love Lane Mattituck , NY 11952 December 10 , 1990 Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Main Road Southold , NY 11971 RE : Subidivision application of Frank Cichanowicz and Thomas Jerome at Maple Lane , Southold 1000- 75-2-8&$ Dear Mr . Geoghringer : Please advise as to the right of access on Maple Lane , Southold , New York with regard to the above referenced . It has come to our attention through the initial stages of developing this property that a 280A right of access may or may not be necessary from your Board . If is is necessary , please notify us immediately so that we may proceed . If this is not required , we have enclosed a copy of the proposed subdivision plan to see if this right of access should be updated . If this access needs to be updated , please advise as to what the current specifications of your Board are . Thank you for your prompt attention to this request . sincerely , Henryt� Raynor , Jr . HER :ml Enc . CC : Southold Town Planning Board Ray Jacobs , Superintendent of Highways Frank Cichanowicz III Thomas Jerome DEC ! 3 !0, r. as 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn . SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman V� _ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward '� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 12, 1990 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board reviewed the Cluster map dated November 1, 1990, at their last work session. Please make the following changes to the cluster map: 1. All lots must have a minimum width of 125 feet at the building setback line; 2. An easement area of 75 feet must be shown along the rear of Lots 1-9 and Lots 11-17. This area is to be left undisturbed. 3 . The area in the middle of the cul-de-sac is to be shown as open space. The access as shown from Main Road is over a private road. Unless your clients obtain title to this piece of land, they will have to obtain 280A approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Access, either by ownership or 280A approval, must be obtained before the Planning Board could grant final approval to the subdivision. Please indicate in writing how your clients wish to proceed. Should your clients decide to pursue the 280A approval, the Planning Board will recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals that the road be built in accordance with the Town's Highway Specifications for major subdivision roads ( 24 ' width) . The Board will also recommend that the applicant be bonded for these improvements. Upon submission of revised maps and the above mentioned letter in reference to the access to the parcel, the Board will proceed with their review. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , >'s Chairman cc: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Nov, 11, 19* SUBFiC� M5 . To: Sotthold Town Planning Board Frogk: Henry Raynor q Re: Chic/Jerome Major Subdivision S 2 I Enclosed herewith amneded maps per Planning Board re- quest, Please set for next avilable date for approval of enclosed, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS vy ^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ''- >Y� _N Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward '� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 27, 1990 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Jerome and Ciechanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board reviewed the Yield map dated July 6, 1990, and the Cluster map dated November 3, 1989 . The following pertains to the Yield map: 1 . The Board no longer requires that land for park and playground purposes be shown on the Yield map. As per Section A106-38 E. ( 3) of the Town Code, the Planning Board will be requiring a fee of two thousand dollars ( $2,000. ) per lot for each vacant lot in the subdivision. 2. The proof of access which was submitted shows that the subject properties have access over Maple Avenue, however, this must be substantiated with a metes and bounds description. It is not clear from the description submitted exactly where the access is located. In addition, all encumbrances and structures along the proposed access must be shown on the map. The following revisions must be made to the Cluster map: 1. A tap to the adjacent parcel on the west must be provided. This tap road should be located more than 125' from the cul-de-sac for traffic safety purposes. 2. Lot 1 must be either reduced in size to 40,000 square feet, or must be set off from the larger parcel. 3. An easement area of 75 feet must be shown along the rear of Lots 1- 8 and Lots 10 - 17 . This area is to be left undisturbed. 4. The Board is not in favor of the two islands shown at the entrance road. The Board requests that these be removed. Upon submission of the above mentioned information pertaining to the access over Maple Avenue, and revised cluster maps, the Board will continue with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly your/s, / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ins Chairman 5ct�ic.E' MS P. 0. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 July 6, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Subdivision of Jerome and Cichanowicz 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Sirs: Enclosed herewith are revised yield maps for the above referenced per instructions of your Board. Please note prior to this we have forwarded the legality of of access, a question that had been raised, to Maple Avenue. We have forwarded a metes and bounds description and the enclosed is the final element Bequest to determine a yield map prior to obtaing sketch approval . We would appreciate a response at your very earliest convenience. Sincerely, Henr t. nor, Jr. HER:ml Enc. CC: Jerome Cichanow icz U [?,1 � n 1� JL -91990 S44gRLa- MS P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 June 4, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Major Subdivision Proposal for Jerome and Cichanowicz LOOO-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Sirs: As per your request of May 8, 1990, please find enclosed the authorization for the owners for me to act on the behalf of Mr. Jerome and Mr. Cichanowicz to process this subdivision. Sincerely, AenVryJqRaynV, JI) HER:ml Enc. x Jv e March 16, 1989 jr crank A. Cichanowicz `III & Thomas Jerome c/o Briarcliff Maple Avenue. Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Peconic, NY 11958 To Whom It May Concern: We, Frank A. Cichanowicz III and Thomas Jerome, hereby authorize Henry E. Raynor, Jr. to act on our behalf in the subdivision of our properties at Maple Avenue, Southold, New York, further identified as District 1000, Section 75, Block 2, Lot 9 and District 1000, Section 75, Block 2, Lot 8. y^ FRANK A. CICHANOWICzI AMAJ z , Vol res. P. 0. Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 May 21, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Major Subdivision Proposal for Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Sirs: As per your letter of May 8, 1990, please find enclosed the following: 1) Copy of deed for Jerome property which gives metes and bounds description and proof of access over Maple Avenue. 2) Copy of Cichanowicz deed which gives metes and bounds description and proof of access over Maple Avenue. A Yeild Map is being prepared by Peconic Surveyors and will be forwarded upon completion. The authorization from the owners for me to act as their agent will be forthcoming. 'ncerely, Henry �Ra Vr. HER:ml Enc. - 2 deeds CC: Jerome and Cichanowicz i lAY 2 3 1990 'P) '1 So,,6,d N.Y.B.T.U.Form 8007"8-,g.20M in and Sale Deed. ,i,h Co.enanr again,,Gr+rrols Ans—�ual m Corpornio a / CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIO HIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY. oR N.Y.S . 1ISEe S)71,1 Transfer THIS INDENTURE, made the 14th day of March nineteen hundred and eighty Tax $60 . 50 BETWEEN STANLEY WIEPZYNSKI and MARTA WIEPZYNSKI, his wife, residing at (no #) West Valley Brook Road, Califon, New Jersey party of the first part, and FRANK A. CICHANOWICZ III, residing at (no #) Lupin Drive, Cutchogue, New York C) Q` party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of Ten and 00/100---------- --------------------------- ($10 . 00) -------------------------- dollars, lawful money of the United States, and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows : (� BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of land of the Long Island Railroad Co. where same is intersected by the division line between premises hereinafter described and premises now or formerly K. of Vincent Ovsianik and Mary S . Ovsianik, his wife; running thence South 250 44 ' 10" East along said last mentioned land through a monument and a post 1835 . 66 feet to a monument; thence South 620 <1 49 ' 00" West still along said last mentioned land 28. 67 feet; thence n South 260 00 ' 40" East still along said last mentioned land 239 .92 feet to a monument set in the northwesterly terminus of Maple Avenue (Private Road) ; thence South 591 57 ' 20" West partly along the north- TnxrlAr westerly terminus of Maple Lane 34 . 20 feet to a monument set at the DESICNATION point of intersection of the division line between the premises rns(. 1000 herein described, the premises now or formerly of Stelzer and the westerly line of Maple Avenue (Private Road) ; thence still continuing s,. p75(T() South 590 57' 20" West along the land now or formerly of Stelzer 291 . 82 feet to a monument; thence North 260 02 ' 30" West still along Blk, d2rD said land now or formerly of Stelzer, 2077. 18 feet to a monument and ,�.,ll the southerly side of land of the Long Island Railroad; thence North Lo((0 0080-7) 600 .33 ' 00" East along the southerly side of land of. the Long island Railroad Co. 364 . 49 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. l for ingress & egress & utility service TOGETHER with a right of way in common with others/66 feet more or less, in width, to and from the above described premises over Maple Avenue, a private road, southerly to Main-State-Road, the westerly line of said right of way being described as follows : BEGINNI14G at a monument set at the point of intersection formed by the division line between the premises hereinbefore described, the premises now or formerly of Stelzer and the westerly line of Maple Avenue (Private Road) ; running thence South 26° 05 ' 40" East along the several lands now or formerly of Stelzer, Gajeski, Harris �'r. MAY 2 3 ra E t iREe �-3eer.E- �. and Ovsianik and through a monument set at the point of inter- section between the division line of the lands now or formerly of Harris and Ovsianik and the westerly line of Maple Avenue (Private Road) 471. 91 feet to the northerly line of Main-State- Road. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE the same premises conveyed to the party of the first part by deed dated July 13 , 1968 and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk' s Office on July 31, 1968 in Liber 6391 Page 558 . UU 77 i • f a:77��•�P�6f•7 4 TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises, TO HAVE AND TO HOED the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of tjie party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: Sta ey Wiepafniki Marta Wiepzy r. it 011,r . , a , , IiL l C3I liS\ 11EW r K STATZ OF NEW TORR,COUNW OF SUFFOLK BE: STATE OF MI WXORE, COUNTY cWUFFOLK u; On the 14thday of March 19 80, before me On the 14t!-I day of March 1980 , before me personally came personally came STANLEY WIEPZYNSKI MARTA WIEPZYNSKI to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. executed the same. rtt.t� t � �f M Notary Pub ' c Notary Public CL'9'i.'." 1 . 1^,AK BARBARA NACHUN 11'51.;J. Mals of !4ev, "T�•:P Notary Public, State of Naw York t!.•. 11 si ffr-11; Cniteyy,, No. 52-4635190 Suffolk County CPmeu mn F t1l11 1 .r.h ?o, IS10 commission Wiles March 30A MCI 9 d STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF ss: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with say that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of that he knows the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. jBaTgain Anb bale Herb SECTION WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRAN'TOR'S ACTS BLOCK TITLE No. N`\( ( 14,) _)" Lor STANLEY WIEPZYNSKI and MARTA COUNTY OR TOWN WIEPZYNSKI , his wife TAX BILLING ADDRESS TO FRANK CICHANOWICZ III Recorded At Request of The Title Guarantee Company RETURN BY MAIL TO: STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD OF TIRE UNDERWRITERS Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq. DssributeJby Main Road — P . 0. Box 38 TITLE GUARANTEE- Mattituck, New York 11952 NEWYORK Zip No. ATICOR COMPANY W V Y O 0 1 Z O BE BeBe 11 O F W , F N Of s W c s N _N S f W W -r - } 0/ - ] `/c)1. 02 Su[ylnd N.Y.a•'f.U.Form 8007.13-77.30M� .and Sale UeeJ,wi[h Covenant again[Gramoi[Ac6-1 al or Cerpotuieo. CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT—THIP INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE YiED BY LAWYERS ONLY. V L1108404 PAGE 06. a THIS INDENTURE, made the 5th day of July , nineteen hundred and seventy-eight BETY/M MARY S. OVSIANIK, residing at (No #) Maple Avenue, Peconic, New York 11958, Surviving Spouse of VIXEM Oi7SIANIK, LATE of the Town of Southold party of the first part, aad .CJERCME and J F _ afe, residing at '!Z-I 11 Springs Drive, Melville, New York 117 6 'JU _ 0 -, REAL-ESTATE -`-" 302 JUL 19 1(78 L ITRAN6FER iAX ski;^ SUFFOLK -COUNTY party of the second part, ' WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of TEN and 00/100----- --($10.00)— — ---dollars, 00 lawful money of the United States, paid C. by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or K. successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, m lying and being i:oWn at Peconic, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded arra described as follows: [ ,) BEGINNING at a point on the easterly side of Maple Avenue, a Private Road, where the same is intersected by the division line between the premises hereinafter described and land now or formerly of Williams, said point being distant 160.50 feet North 24° 18' West fran the corner formed by the intersection of said easterly side of Maple Avenue with the northerly side of Main (New York State, Route #25) Road, and running thence along the said easterly side of Maple Avenue, North 260 05' 40" West, 306.31 feet to the northerly terminus of Maple Avenue thence along the northerly terminus of Maple Avenue South 590 57' 20" West, 34.77 feet to lam now or formerly of Wiepzynski; thence: along said lands ollowin xhree (3). courses t and distances: (1) North 26° 00' 40" West, 239.92 feet; (2) North 620 49' East, 28.67 feet; arra (3) North 25° 44' 10" West, 1835.66 feet to Land nav or formerly of Long Island Railroad Ccupany; thence along said land North 600 33' East, 360.89 fec to land now or formerly of Nierodzik; thence along said land and along land naw or formerly of Mooney, the following six (6) courses and distances.. (1) South 250 47' 40" East, 665.83 feet; (2) South 250 43' 40" East, 1,526.10 MAY 23 1990 Yq LIBER 0464 PAGE 07 feet; (3) South 630 42' 20" West, 221.32 feet; (4) South 270 16' 50" East, 93.45 feet; (5) South 600 34' West, 21.04 feet; (6) South 250 071, Fast, 117.70 feet to land now or formerly of Tiering; thence along said land and along land now or formerl of Williams, afosepentioned, South 650 55' 30"West, 110.52 feet to the easterly side of Maple Avenue, the point or place of BEGINDIIK. TOGETHER with a right of ingress arra egress, over Maple Avenue, a Private Road. to Main (New York State Potiute #25) Fbad. BEING AND INTNEED TO BE the same premises conveyed to Mary S. Ovsianik and- Vincent Ovsianik, as tenants by the entirety, by deed fran James Addison Baker and Sarah Elnora Baker, his wife, dated January 13, 1920, and recorded February 2, 1920 in Liber 995 of conveyances at page 47 in Suffolk County clerk's Office. 4 p �+ p 1.IBER04U4 PAGE UO • TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof, TOGETHER with the appurfegances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to Paid premises, , 1 `TO HAVE AND TO HOLT) the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party, p(,jhq;sacpnd part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first pert ho'du y ecut 'thta deed the ear first above" written. IN PR ;SKKCB 01: U Y (•_ G Maly s. ovslanik fl 6 AR PAGE 09 .iF Naw YORK. COUNTY OF Suffolk � ps STATS OF NEW TORR,COUrf"* aai r the 5th day of July 19 78 , before me On the day of 19 , before me personally came MaLy S. OVSianik personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she executed the same. executed the same. tic WILLIAM WICaMAM UTAST PUNK I ,STATE OF KIM 00 Qualified in uff,'lk C4Dnly_ ons aspires karch 90, 1917 STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ss: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF us On the day of 19 , before me On the i day of 19 , before me personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. say that he resides at No. i that he is the that he is the of of the corporation described the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- affixed.by order of the board of directors of said corpora- tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. jlncgnin RnD $nit ;Bttb SECTION WIlt1 COVLNANIAGAIN$/I'/GRAN I owsssActs E No. z�)I —rj— Y �7 oC BLOCK LOT MARV S. (7JSIANIK COUNTY OR TOWN TO 05 THCMAS JFXIO"IE AND ecAt Request of The Title Guarantee Company J'1Z'E JE(� RBTUaN BY MAIL TO: STANDARD FORK or Nrw YORK soASD Or nru UND94WIUTM 1 OMM A. ASHLEY, ESQ. Meribaud by 90-04 Sutphin Boulevard TITLE GUARANTEE- Jamaica, New York 11435 J NEWYORK Zip No. ATICOR COMPANY TI i U r C ' c i,iNA03 )INJARS o y,tn>- d0 )IU310 = 2 30113d'r UnH1dV CZgj4Z 9lrWd9e Z 61 lop Nw0$ � �ka 030210030 i • i UL PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman yQ +'Doi- Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 May 8, 1990 Henry Raynor 320 Love Lane Mattituck, New York 11952 RE: Major Subdivision Proposal for Jerome and Cichanowicz SCTM# 1000-75-2-8 & 9 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board is in receipt of the application for the above mentioned subdivision. Please note that the Board cannot proceed with their review until the following information is submitted: 1. A Yield map in conformance with all requirements of the Residential Low-Density (R80) District. The map must include appropriate land for drainage purposes. 2. The metes and bounds property description. 3 . Proof of access over Maple Avenue, which is a private right-of-way. 4. Authorization from the owners for you to act as their agent. Upon receipt of the above mentioned items, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 6• 2" 9' FINISHED GRADE .I _ _ 1112• 29.49 50.0' ` n ASPHALT 44 - ffAR2i u2' SURFACE WEARING NING BO ARD h w 0 3,000 Ps/. Concrete PROFILESpiopose�[ of 2B' yrctoee ,25, !2' 12' BRIARCLIFF ACRES B 24. AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TYPICAL MOUNTABLE CURB 6 DETAIL SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 075 - 02 - 08 & 09 p o — JAN. 3, 1992 FINE GRADE w `I I/2' WEARING COURSE , 2 1/2' BINDER COURSE Ln o 0 0 0 \�4' COMPACTED BASE COURSE 3/4' STONE BLEND OR CRUSHED CONCRETE TYPE 'B' MOUNTABLE CURB 0000 LB. CONCRETE PROFILE JEROME STREET TYPICAL ROAD SECTION SCALE: VERT. 1" = 10' HORIZ. lit = 100' 1 FZ 2P,96 2!°. 5/ 2274' 267 Yt.<,0.29 /8T25 _ ¢'/nle�sec fia � 29.70 26.31 Ae ?3.21 9+50 Je'�me SI 07.55 zc.o 26.75 � 27.45 opn c.e.e] CFiSt•�4 /$.O t4.79r osed Piope -iso re cnv om G6 g � 3o CB'S Cf:23S5 ,w N ' 27." cc: 22.75 ce"4 ZE,9 96 I£=t41x c.6'6 rc•t255ct � c z ce./Iz , 3 2 W w ' o m co 1; b `1 Y' M N O 4 q 7.1 `co to in 7 M N O PROFILE MAPLE A VENUE SCALE VERT 1" = 10' HORIZ. 1" = 100 ' 1� N.Y.S. L1�. NO. 49618 PECOM'C SWVEYORA -PRC. (518)785- 5020 P. 0. BOX 909 U4#V ROAD SOUTHOLD, MY. 11871 4/9192 rev/s Ione 88-922 2 0, xe P°'°c,1` e V� 9rT QO N e°e KEY MAP 5 e 24 (NO SCALE) !/ X - 25,7 - IMI TS OF DRAINAGE AREA N = NUMBER OF DRA INA GE AREA 25.9 UT/LITIES(ELECTRIC,ETC. TO BE 26.2 // UNDERGROUND ELEVATIONS 8 CONTOURS LINES ARE X25,5 / REFERENCED TO NGVD. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS xzs.s V=ARC X24.9 i A= TRIBUTARY AREA R = 6'•-0.5' RAINFALL - RECHARGE AREA 2"-O.17 RAINFALL -LEACHING POOLS X C= COEFF. I FOR PA VEMEN T X24.9 / 25,0 ao_ 0.3 FOROTLIER n / 250 x2s.3 PAVEMENT = 12000 sq. It. 0 THER = 82910 sq. ll. 12000+0.17x1= 4228 cu. ll. x24,9 82910xO.17xO.3= 1938 cu. ft. X24.6 6166 cu. It. G 6166/68.4=90 V.F.112= 7.5 0 \ PROVIDE 8'0 l.p.s 12' DEEP �r \\ \\ 737S 2 PA OTHER ENT /8000 200280s� 1t. 11. q• 116 18000xO.5x1= 9000 cu. It. a�oJSaS / \\\\ \\\ ,r 200280xO.5xO.3= 30042 cu Yl. x23.4 2 39042 cu. It. ?�. \ x23.8 3 PAVEMENT= 3600 sq. /t. 16,9 13,0 0 17'4 OTHER = 48375 cu. It. ' \ � ! 9�O 3600 xO.5x1= 1800 cu.Il. fy Z 48375xO.5x 0.3 = 7256 cu. 1t. x17,1 \ \ 9056 cu. ff. ` X23,2 X19,8 o o. pF \\ \� e �o� 4 PAVEMENT= 17400 sq. ft. v. 6.7 \\ \\ \\ x198 4h' s / \\ - OTHER = 95785 sq. It X \\ x n9 . / 7400xO.5xl = 8700 cu. It. \ 21.7 21,7 \ \ � rrrR r Ii ° irrc \\\ \� 20 95785x0.5x0.3= /4368 cu. /l. \ \ A/* s 23068 cu. ft. NURSERY p i )o �,if A'+ \ \ X J, � x NURSERY \ � \� TOTAL 71/66 cu. 11. LS•D \ rn � \ Z \ \ \ �C. \ \ o \\ oo \\ \ \ 'RECHARGE BASIN CAPACITY AT 7' % DEPTH = 89,206 cu. N. \\ \ [yxzl.o NO 22,1 \\ \\ 0.• 6�� O \\ \\ \\\ 'y 2 \ \ x22,7 \ d •;s 3 + / / \ \ \\ % c \ \\\ �\ � / V\ tie X15.5 / X24.1 \ ao > e S \\\ \\\ 36.1 \\ y�4 / \� 4 by - p�� 9�' •� O 4a \ \ \ 34,8 \ \ x 1:1 PRELIM/NARY PLAN OF "• \ \\\`�"o_ \\\ BRIARCLIFF ACRES $ ` \\ AT SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD3x SUFFOLK COUNTY N. Y, \\ X33a 1000 - 75 - 02 - 08 & 09 NURSERY \ ��\ .ox 8,9 Scale: 1" = 100' 3e. j•a�, o' 1992 x26.8 3 3D.9 X Jan. 7 r IZ? Yr/ s 29.6 \ ,'` �,`,i�•` \ / bry 8 O y9 7(33,0 ,24,'1 26.7 \\ OC v[i`•, J iS_ oo_ r➢O^,pA 140 '/ / �' F X32,8 p �. 50' moo'\fo\\ 14 X25,4 33 28,3 ��75 x Nth290V -p'• �'o 353 •L ' 1 5� 6y .�}.� 30• � X27.0 WDO➢ PILES 29.2 X27,4 7,3 O qb 26.7 O •q1` d Roa+-d Line � I 27.7 ' d' 'y � (SEE SEC A s fl2 aaiy a ax26,4 f ro N/ O/F LAND of TOB/N ` 3o Tc 26° - 3o I - i Le a of cxsh� - faveme7{ f� be cu�ha!p` fo � rc 27.2 �e 9e of cx'3/in9 ha./f _ _ivi/ -aeP/h-- . . _ Pavemee(-- Ilaw flow N/(Y/F _� 254 \ xe. P MAIN ROAD oto (N . Y.S. RTE. 25 ) RoefRtA HERiNG N �O o I-- Q N/O /F Note: PAVEMENT TO STA. Ot 75 [A7PP2 g2 SEC. A TO BE 30' WIDE /, 0 CONVERGE 11 OWNERS : JANET A. DAVIS �- TO 24' BY STA. tOO. `v 8OI�I�V 'OWN RROR. FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ N ['I mY 1 6 BOARD --�•T'•' N 26' 05' 40" W 306.31' 2 ecRE. Q THOMAS LE AVENUE 3 -K-.� pOflCM Q Prepared in accordance with the minimum BUILDING ZONE p/STRICT: A - C SOUTHOLD, 11971 rfNCE +�\ standards for tide surveys as established C/O BRIARCLIFF �9;-A5_��`$('�, O ^ R.R. TIE EOGC46l `'SPLIra RA(L•FE r��00 N/O/F JANET OAV/$ ED"N6 O y MAIN ROAD t tN,. •, n y �_ R.R.TIE c by the L./.A.L.S and approved and adopted SCHOOL DISTRICT: 5 PECONIC N Y. 11956 �gfor such use by The w York State Land HENRY RAYNOR N Z*, 18 _s 3 Title Association FIRE DISTRICT: 28 P. 0, DRAWER A ^! JAMESPORT• N. Y. U947 R MAPLE A VENUE 16*.22' IC. NO. 49519 'n ,�, ur (PRIVATE ROAD ) P5106 29eN PC N/O /F N/O /F TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres N/O/F N/O/F , THOMAS G 6 , P. I BOX JAMES G. 6 MARY K. BREWER BARNEY pVS/AN/K 6 JENN/f MAIN ROAD BRUSH JEANETTE JEROME I OVS/AN/K �f� vis io0y - SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 89 - 322 ©� 2 1`00 VohiIlullli, I4111nllll 011111-111110, hill 11,111 lilgl; 11164�I430 h � � NIT i;2 Alden W. Young, Pr°Jesational Engineer & Land SurueyoT I Hung t doward N. Young, Land S.�Meyor Th.,. C. WOLpert, ProJeesionaL Engineer [tbvnina XrF. Abruezo, Lund Surveyor Enylondnp // _. .aN.�a, Homes th H°rbor Sou 4096 �� h Subdivision File N°' 1 Lot 2° / Ar County / a Suffolk I Lot 1s Lot 18 Lot 17 S�bdlvD.Rl I THE WATER SUPPLY & SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES FOR ALL LOTS 15 Lot 15 ¢rtY Lino os al oG--r';'925� osklIN THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS AND �iI�I OP- Lot PrP of pr county Flle No. /'IL \ ' REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARThIENT OF HEALTH. "An Suffou R,M uoxuuexT 11214.82 22) , 252. 1`'R B V Lot 14 ENOE I Li nam (N 79.39'00 BID q'0 THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. LIC. NO. 614E3 Lot 13 — 2 STORY PCd G 963.02 ATIM ) " uwu,.xY FRAME HOOSE n° Q >CA EION 600' IIt, r.,. N 79'19'00E_ 100.00 2 Fmw x STORY Q I9. S p0.nINAGE t 754.8 ,.a xum FRAME BAR O 'I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT COMPLY WITH gpEA81483 REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF 1 (_ `2290• xaAon rgiY�, 79.22'10" 'E rasa , o. - 3' TOWN LAW AND - - - t2019 ar xum BOMndorY Lln SOUTHOLD, EXCEPT AS MODIDIFIcD PURSUANT TO SECTION 278 OF THC lorrn erly N rjoutbErly Una WRIMELLON a O -- SOFESSI�P ARTICLE RV Or THE CODE OF THE TOWN OF EOUTHOLC, .d HOW BMoo 'Uto Z Estaddent Wdn on SubdIR15. ° FRAME SHEDS - Lon ,gyp„ 339. .-os DD _ —4 o �to� CoM tY.r,Flor H°m 4096 , I, - SHOWN TED JANUARY 20,ALLY EXIST AND THEIR ALL CONCRE ARE CORRECTLY Fronk _ HEREBY CERTIFY hIAT THLS-MAP WAS MAGE BY ACTUAL SURVEYS 1� POSTIONS 61' 460. e N _ Bohn LN Lina o, SHOWN AND ALL DIMENSIONAL AND GEODETIC DETAILS ARE CORRECT.- r,.4I'f . Ln Eltltl" yAtn SO forarrnlolY OCl,JN°� oW Das�re^° 173.00' now or formerly G o1k guunDiuto °s 447 yy George A. Stepn oski Fran 10837, GP Lot 1 S 84'45'00" In Ilber ae 5 0227 00" W = N AREA = 5.O001 ACRES `TOE R8 pO AAGE KENNETH F. ABRUZZO, N.Y.S. L5. UC. N0. 49999 ' c METAL ° N 8B'26'00" Z m SHED 1200'9. "THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAN HAS BEEN o ^A] R3 APPROVED BY ARTICLE 16 OF THE TOWN LAW" j O N 703j•$Q,x �� tV� DATE OF APPROVAL CHAIRMAN f w 6B 308 + 14' I Nti CCeNN ➢L1 RCgD "E, r SITE DATA:co Lot 2 Z 1 . TOTAL AREA = 17.5473 ACRES ;)o2. ZONING USE DISTRICT .>I' AREA = 12.5472 ACRES 3 4� RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY A "R-80" 3. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 2 '!l" rV NOTE: A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS HAS BEEN FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE i IN USER C.P. & LIBER C.P. m NOTE: 1. ■ = MONUMENT FOUND 2. O = PIPE FOUND - — '� °w�• _ 3. SUBJECT PARCEL DESIGNATED ASLOT1 AS SHOWN ON o a,m 14' e+ "SUBDIVISION MAP OF PROPERTY SURVEYED FOR I Q 5pp 50 ry GEORGE A STEPN OSKI" FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE n CLERK OF SUFFOLK COUNTY ON AUG. 3, 1992 AS ,yt N FILE NO. 9255. 7y7 oM" ~ 5 7338 W 0 WN ER. BAYViEW SOUTH pp32Op . W nZ v o HARBOR LIMITED PARTNE ktG- - - UTLHHARBOR Rone F S now or formerly SOHOD, N e e 2 Sp a o Southold Fire District 003 SEp 3 D 1 94 o Lot 2 MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT bolifl I Subdivision "George A. Stepnoski" LM — ,_, . ^ �� PREPARED FOR BAYVIEW SOUTH HARBOR LIMITED (PARTNERSHIP SUFFOLK COUNTY OEPARTMNITOFHEALtHd1ElWIOE6 At: SOUTHOLD Town of SOUTHOLD eet� Baaedupon the informatlonStIb ted farthiaProject,filing Suffolk County, New York 1 of a realty subdivision or develapmom map with tins department is not raqqulrod urMar the terms of Ar4kla 6 of o the Suffolk County Sanitary Code alme all parcels ars Suff. Co. Tax Map: 1 1000 75 1 a 1 221 residential and oath Subdivided parcel is greaW than ti acres in area. °la>.mt s.Mm„ Block Lot Application must be made frtoval of Construction at let; a NEhy water supply and sanitary et; fide$ for each individual paroel and Standards of the department,offeotive at tlmeof subMISsion, must be satisfied• rr DATE ' r AUG. 19 19q4 f JULY 21,1994 DATE :JAN. 20,1994 m- ��NS. SCALE :1"= 100' °GLAND S JOB No. :94-0016 SHEET NO .1 OF 1 o-• o _ O 50389 23.7 - - - - - - -- L1A!f1TS'OF DRAINAGE AREA = NL tBER - 9RAINAGE AREA 25.9 - - - UTILITIESIELECTRIC,ETC. TO BE - 2&2 /' UNDERGROUND EL€VA TIONS & CONTOURS LINES ARE X25.5 // REFERMCED _ TO NGVD. RAINACE CAL CUL A TIONS x255 V=ARC X24,9 iii A= TRIBUTARY AREA '151 R 6 '-0.5' RAINFALL- RECHARGE AREA of 2"=0.17' RAINFALL-LEACHING POOLS C-=. COEFF.. l FOR PAVEMENT. X24 9 // /e 25.0 ao- - - - - _ -- - -- - - --- - - - - -- - -_- _ . 0.3 FOR OTHER x25.3 / PAVEM _ =ry7s iF. 25.0 O THER - 82910 sq.' Tr. - U OG / • ' / / i 12000x017x1= 4228 cu. fl. 910-0117x0.3= . ft. X24.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- --- - - - _- - -,-- - - - - - -- - V fl 82 cu X24.6 - - - - _ - - - - - - ---_- - --- - - - - - - \ x25.7 - 6166168.4=90 1 PROVIDE 9 8'0 Fpl2 /27 DEEP �O \\ %. L$ �\ at.- 2 PA OTHER€Nj ' 200f280 s00 q.ffl. ff- X23.7 / 3.6 / `\ \ 18000*0.5x1= 9000 cu. fl. 1 s�S / \�\\ \\ 200280xO.5xO.3= 30042 cu 'fl. X23.4 ZO 39042 cu. ft. xz3.e 3 PAVEMENT= 3600 sq. fl. 0 174 \`\ OTHER 48375 cu. fl. 13.0 . 16.9 \ 9 B�tn - 3600 -0.5x1= 1800 cu.fi. y - �� p 48375xO.5x 0.3 = 7256 cu. fl. 4 � X17.1 \\\ \\\ \ - .gip 9056 cu. fl. 16.6e X19.8 - 1 F� 4 PAVEMENT= 17400 sq. fl. \ ° OTHER - _ - 95785 sq. ft - x17. 15.7 \� \\ \\ o`5�"V a" 'La �� / �\ v /7400xO.5xl = 8700 cu. ft. \\ 21.7 / a ° llo � yn� �� \ \\ 95785xO.5xO.3= 14368 cu. fl. \ \ 21.7 \ d `\ 23068 cu. fl. \\ \ NURSERY e 4 \ $ 1y' / ', _ \ \ \ \` 3.4 O 15.80 % 5 a \ \ \\\ `tTOTAL CIT cu. ft. NURSERY X \ \ %� \ \ Z.\\ \ 'RECHARGE BASIN CAPACITY AT T % DEPTH = 86,266 cu: ft. - 221 - � \ {�"_'_ +` _ 1� m•z - ..- _ '�e� _ ��- ;�" \- - _35,3'. _ -:,- _ _ __-... _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ i \ 35.3 • X15.5 t � - .`�\ -- �' X24.1 X115 - - \ 358 \\ G O-o - 6 . t'uh`' er • - '�=- x1:1 � \ �� ` \. - PRELIMINARY PLAN OF BRIARCLIFF ACRES AT SOUTHOLD rr x ` TOWNOFSOUTHOLD 3X\\ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. o / , 7000 - 75 -02 - 09 & 09 NURSERY Sca/e: 1" = 100r 3o.rix X26.8 Jan. 7, 1992q u .1 X33.0 lk � z t �/ � y ' ,' �: ¢" a°moo►,' 26.7 \ cam, - - / _ `�o_C3 '3P 8 32.8 xP9 _ - .� 2 OR X 29.7 / i q. .131 35.3 - * 28.0 - X27.0 WUUD PILES `�/\ . x2 I - -\ X27.4 7'3 A 0.5 7.8 - - A \ �y1 f SEE SEC 21� ry1 R I - \27.7 X26.4 { \l Iwl17 � D I N/O/F LAND of TOB/N i � �YY 13 Tom �- 5. q P9 ROBERTA HERMG 04 - \ L4 _ - a N/O/F -- (I� „nP` OWNERS= SEC. A e JANET A. DAVIS FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ /N -- m PROR. THOMAS = 2 eLDR, Q MAPLE AVENUE N 28' 05' 10" W 308.91' SOUTHOLD, 11971 3 pppC1 Q Prepared in accordance with the minimum BUILDWO ZONE DISTRICT. A - C C/O BRIARCLIFF standards for title surveys as setabkehed MAIN ROAD • 1. RR TE ED6N6l \,,.s�uriR,ui.,r�ce. o N/OJF JANET DAMS coa"jG b the L.LA.L.S and approved wed adopted SCHOOL DISTRICT, 5 - PECOMC N Y. 11968 ^ m R.n. �' for such use b The /Vsw York State Land, HENRY E RAYNO y FWE DISTRICT• 28 P. o. DRAWF9 i -- __ 3 Tithr Associatron. \ 4 MAPLE A VENUE N ?4. W 184.22lb2 rT ." ✓R f.S. LIC. NO. 49618 ° o (PRIVATE ROAD ) n Q PECON SURVEYORS, P.C. N/O/F h y TOTA N/O/F - ``- (516) 765 - 5020 N/O/F i N/O/F THOMAS C. b BARNEY OVSIANK 6 JENN/E MAIN ROAD09 BRUSH JAMES-G. d MARY K. BREWER I 0VSIAAW JEANETTE JEROME SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 FINISHED - y 2z 74 GRADE _ 1 //P' 50.01 Tt ASPHALT - Y144WEARINGSURFACE70.9e 3,000 PSI. Concrete pi000se¢ PROFILES JAN 1 3 92 2B• ya�e 12.51 I2' 12' BRIARCLIFF ACRES • you xo�n o N 24 A T SOUTHOLD pUNN NG BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TYPICAL MOL#VrA&E CURB DETAIL I 6 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 075 - 02 - 08 & 09 I W JAN. 3, 1992 y F FINE GRADE f °+ M/2' WEARING COURSE 2 1/2' BINDER COURSE �Oi O O a O 4' COMPACTED BASE COURSE - r� t; N O 3/.4' STONE BLEND OR CRUSHED CONCRETE TYPE 6' MOUNTABLE CURB !3000 LB. CONCRETE PROFILE' . JEROME STREET TYPICAL ROAD SECTION � y SCALE.- VERT. 1"= 10' HORIZ. 1" = 100' RI. 2>R9a _ ,5_v, 27..71i' 247 re.=M.24 I /8x25 .. ¢'mfsisec flan 29.70 76:51 AC '0 9+50 JerOine S/ - 26.75 22 f5 f 040 - 15,•07 ( exsi•?4 E4.7 0.536 Pio�p�d', _ -1isa' a cror a /scvv®ry.� ; C.9�g 906'• P3.55 ' �+„ Li6r 227D Ge 4 h tale.+s xte"%2x Ire•VAS g y p a - L.e.l1la a i W' a O O O O O O P O O i h0 O O O h O O O p O m m n b f`1 N 00 W 1i tp 'n v1 R q N O O PROFILE , MAPLE A .VENUE SCALE: INERT. 1" = 10' HORIZ. 1" - 100' ( s NY.S. UC. NO. 49618 = VEYORS, P.C. (518)Ar- 020' P o BOX 909 MANY !ROAD SO!/TMD MY. "07t 89-322 2 �sV e0 N S� e� Zo KEY MAP z e (NO SCALE) X 25.7 = LIMI TS OF DRAINAGE AREA = NUMBER OF DRAINAGE AREA zs.9 UTILITIES(ELECTRIC,ETC. TO BE 26'2 UNDERGROUND i ELEVATIONS 8 CONTOURS LINES ARE x25s �� REFERENCED TO NGVD. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS X25.5 i V=ARC X24. Q e / / TRIBUTARY R = 6"-0.5'4RAINFALL- RECHARGE AREA 2"-0.17'' RAINFALL-LEACHING POOLS C= COEFF. I FOR PAVEMENT X24.9 / 25.0 ao- 0.3 FOR0T4ER 250 x2s.3 I PAVEMENT = 12000 sq. fl. o s�o�d. _ / � � OTHER = 829/0 sq. (l. cFP ` � 12000=0.17x/= 4228 cu. /1. x24.9 829/Ox0.17x0.3= 1938 cu. (1. X24.6 6166 cu. It. \� \ X25.7 , 6166/68.4=90 V.F.112= 7.5 VO PROVIDE 8'0 I.p.s 12' DEEP \\ 2 PAVEMENT = 18000 sq. fl. \ \ x23.7 OTHER = 200280 sq. It. 13.6 \\ �aavJs�SX / \ 200280 055 /0 .3= 30042 cu ft. X23.4 y 39042 Cu. ft. y \ \\ \ 1-'@ � o� 3 PAVEMENT= 3600 sq. ft. 13.0 2� 169 0•' w \4 \�� - X23.8 \ a� OTHER = 48375 cu. ft. !,9 48375x0 .5 /0.3 725/8006 cu.fl/i X 17.1 16.6 \� \\ J(23.2 9056 cu. It. ` X19.8 La 'P� \\ \\ qo uo� 4 PAVEMENT 17400 sq. fl. 1A 1v. 16•� \ \\ OTHER 95785 sq. fl X \\\ x \ �a'• o <� ;+`�. �: \ v 17400xO.5xl = 8700 cu. ft. 21.7 \ atl` • 2° ' \\ \� yo 95785=0.5x0.3= 14368 cu. ft. \ \ 21.7 \\ \ NURSERY a q \ \ ,� p5 \\ \\\ x 23068 cu. fl. 15.8 \ �'•�\ -U S° / A. 2! \ \ \ 34.4 O x \ NURSERY \ n _ 2 \\\ \ 4i TOTAL 7/166 cu. It. 'RECHARGE BASIN CAPAC/TY_A r-- - \ \\ mQ \\ \\ o� DEPTH = 88,200_ cu_ -"A \\ \ \ - X, \\ \\ 00 o \ No�q�6 :, �� \�\ \ \\ \\� mo \ \ x23.7 � �-.j _ �r� 99 T / �•-_ �r �_ �. \\\ \ 35.3 \ 21.8 $. Q°Sc _•CP \ \\ \\\\ \\\ o 35.3 \\\ 0 \ \ \ \\\ X 24.1 35.8 \\\ X16.8 / kal � o,� \ 15 y 9 O; \ L t�y5: 9"y2� v O \\\ \ \ \\ c1Yh(' _ h! x31:1 PRELIMINARY PLAN OF BRIARCL IFF ACRES A T SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. '�' yI}Q� SD _ Vis ' Q \\ \� 30,9 \\ \ 1000 - 75 - OZ - 08 81 O9 NURSERY -. )_ \,\ � �. .\ ADO / \ X334 Sca)e: Yr= 100, Jan. 7, 1992 30.8 X X k�7• � < � �. -1 5 3l X33,0 m 26,7 5 OR \ OC / "9 > a1t so- �1O X32.8 / l 4 _- 33 2EL3 29.7 X X 353 - \ 2B.a rp _ - X27.0 WOOD PILES � � 4 29.2 \ /r, �" ` xv - X27.4 \\27.7 ° Alb a (SEE SEC A ) 0 d i N i 0 F LAND of T000N X26.4 `CJ �. sOuiN^ - NI-07fF 5. O RO@L7tTj�f_:F lG C4Fe - QOP LU SEC. A b JAAN:T A. Di: IS. - - -`., t�P OWNERS: NK A. 'CAECNANUW/CZ kY - - N 28' 05' 40"- W 908.91' 2 � �,` - � e1ar�- Q - AE SiCVE7W.E - 3 `'� - Q Prepered in accordance with"the m"romum BUALDAG ZONE MSTRICT: A - C - SOUTN©LLL. 1f9Ti c- R - �,sRu4rucr ,/ 'S arolF�iUtY` - Q atsddlueds far tide lyrreye aa-aatab6ahed C!O $RGIRCLB"F . a _ ,� . . _ Xa ' - ,; . by Hre LLA:LS and proved and adaptod SCHOOL DISTRICT: 5 MANY - %- - 3 TiM� au T7te_lllsw York State Land, FYIE DISTMOT: 2B mi- E-ME M Y. p85B . - MEIINPY-E :RAYNOR �-. . N .24 18 M! - P. O. DRAINER A MAPLE A VENUE C4 z F H S my I N.Y.S. LIC NO. 49815 (PRIVATE ROAD) "'J SURVEYORS, h s P CONI SURVEYORS, P.C. N/O/F - (518) 755- 5020" - N-/0/F THONMAS C.. Jr, ( N�O1I"` - . d . - - - - TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres - - - - - - N�oiF eXRNEr Nilr a JENIL P. D. BOX 909 - � JAWS Q a MARY 'K BREWER ( - MAIN ROAD BRUSH 1 I JEANETIE JE1P13Y111E I . SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 l f Ov3YAM t 89 o° •o a(y (1 P N /0/ F LAND OF MIRESDI ZIK AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD \ \ __ ♦r Ply " ,g ,0 Po S.25° 47 '40"E. S. 25^ 43'40"E. 1526. 10' N o+� r•� Rs - n5S 40! roy 75 SCEN/C B[/FFE E' ( re � w / malm r/odi3 f✓rDed � � y! 3 M KEY MAP S ,3 Ooxo NO SCALE NO N 't y4aOGO , 411 'h 't 0004 +/ ¢Iaoo�,t ¢3,50i+ pocp'r �j lam+ M 0 h Iq y S.27•'16 '50"E. O \ m "Oi 9$.45' 5.25• T00°E, a A 117. N O N 41000tg,�y/ y O3 N /0/F N , " �LL O ROBERTA HERING LL J OPEN y � ' ( C. G C'L 0Q� .$PAGE` h V) �P /17 t /25 f /L5 //5 "- 2501 N . r (D JANET A DAVIS - 1 O Q w, 5 N.26-05'40"W. 308. 31 SEE SEC. - `?\ N 180 ± /og�'�• E.� ROLA QL� _ . EC A\ MAPLE AVE . (AVE . ( PRIVATE ROAD ) I,JN t y Q Pes/ /3a 'f /so --- N/O/F Q (D08oF " /35f \ Q 10 IIT � FBARNEY OVSIANIK I a Q - M JENNIE OVSIANIK O " 1 ,I ♦`� f E /3 /4 1 Y I 4 ,�I' w ® w w �I N 40000"tel 4oc�'' 4�oota° 40000 ro O '+ � I °. H ro 4£ 000 0 . w eo N A o u m Z 0 C Z OH . . Q a J N i 751 SCEN/ G �uFFE2 fo re^'iu.rn - un cC(s furbeoL N V go 2i bd N. 26 • 02' 30" W. 2077. 1,8' N IN /0 / F L A N D OF TDB I N .. � TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres , In BLDG . ZONE DISTRICT A — C OWNERS : N/oiF FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ III CLUSTER . PLAN OF PROPERTY ROBERTA HERING nl SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 AND C� FIRE DISTRICT: 28 THOMAS JEROME AT SOUTHOLD Iy1 I MAPLE AVENUE SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD n c/o BRIARCLIFF SEC. A I Q MAIN ROAD . SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. ' N/O/F PECONIC „ N.Y. 11958 " �bimy Q HENRY E . RAYNOR O 1000 075 02 08 8 09 JANET A. OA vis 4� ' W P. O. DRAWER A Al 2v' 05' JAMESPOR T`, N.Y. 11947 SCALE 1" 100' t/.,, .r`' °� , •� fd .a� /f 'G .n SEPT 1AL, It9,89 ItI ' H. .I , v r SII Ra +m eaylny A6, w FIa.F� vuT RO/F JANET OAe • °` z Nov. 3, 1989 a Nov. 1, 1980(rev/se) rP W 24' /8'W. road. qIN „MAPLE AVENUE' �4.z2 N jNA 219 PECON'I'C"'sup'vEroRs„ P. c . M (PRIVATE ROAD .) , ( 516 ) 755 - 5020 NCO/F Nio/F - P.O. BOR slog N/O/F THOMAS C. JEROME CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROM N/O/F i y BARNEY OVSIANIK TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERNTOWNSM AIN C - JAMES G 6 MARY K BREWER Sk .� SOUTHOOLDD , N.Y. 11971 BRUSH JEANETTE JEROME JENNIE OVSIANIK _ _ 89 322 r` �R u Po a e0 ee R/ O POP NN /0/ F LAND OF MIRESOI ZIK AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4� PPS \ P y F 20 � � o g PO RO S.25" 47'40"E. S. 250 43'40"E. 1526. 10' H oPP �Pa o � . 22 J!•�F <Lo-S-' 'L /g5 � /QSf /25'+ 125'± 75 5CEN/G etlFFE2 (fo rema.i�� bndisf./rbeel. 3 I £ ' KEY MAP n �3 ; NO SCALE N O •f N � p �z oPo a -1\ �+ 4 4 o, N D 006$t ¢u ,00 odlF i P IN "xFggl - I xI 4.3,Soo _ 4-4,000 4 aoo o0 _ .�3.voo y o 7 m P ��^/G5 � Ali ' xl *t � n fq N S.27e16 X50 E. o z - /� ^�1 93.45' .`' S.25• 7'00"E• a f Q y 40 117 (\I N y 0 4-I0000 w_-Ot _ N /0/F ry' O ROBERTA HERING li C o m' • `0��) �I, all - _ /25__ r'0 - a OPEN S p4C E X95 g P 127. LJ to NTA � � D PE SG,AcE � � /> �12s'+ /27 'r z � Z$a� JANET A DAVIS O Y SE /� ROS N.26e05'40"W. 306.31 " SEE SEC. A �1140 MAPLE AVE . ( PRIVATE ROAD ) Q O p25/oaS /38 '} m— -- -� /30 t O BARNEY OVSIANIK D B JENNIE OV514NIK Al /4 4i tl 0c7o�f o 40,00Od}}I 4oaa�' 43oa>Dfa 1L1 h + 71 3 °o - �: N N Q 4e 000 N 000 - N 40o ooh'�" A 'p > -7 p - ,N N `� m Z 0. Z U W f 0 e N O T o o N o Q Q J o - — -- - —� z ; 75' s cEN/ e .Z3[/Ff'E /2 fe Yerry4�., un pLiS to✓b Cd N a O m ~ - bd /lot /48 + /i2'+ _ /.35" 50, /40�+ /38,'- N. 26 " 02' 30" W. 2077. 16' - N h N IN /0 / F LAND OF TOBIN TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres BLDG . ZONE DISTRICT A – C OWNERS I " N FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ ul CLUSTER PLAN OF PROPERTY A HERWG SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 � FIRE DISTRICT: P8 AND THOMAS JEROME AT SOUTHOLD MAPLE AVENUE SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SEC. A c/o BRIARCLIFF MAIN ROAD SUFFOLK COUNTY N .Y. /O/F )lZl PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 bldg Q HENRY E . RAYNOR T A. DAVIS 1000 - 075 - 02 - 08 8 09 •';� ' +i-n< <.;'^;- N 26` 05' 40' W. 306 3/ C) P. O. DRAWER A e - nl � - JAMESPOR T", N.Y. 11947 o:v Por..n .n SEPT. 1"2,1 1989 0' �. B ff RALE FEN°ErET DAVIS ID' p - M — ".".+< N o z Nov. 3, 1989 € F z� Nov. 1, 1990(revise) l W. iaa Q P,IJ 2 8 "'MAPLE AVENU /64 00 �Arl /7 /991 PE'CONIC \'SUR Y-0%R'�S P. 0 V M (PRIVATE ROAD ) ( 516,) 765 5020 _N/O/F /O/FP.O. BOX 909 N/O/F THOMAS , JEROMMAIN ROAD JAMES G 6 MARY K BREWER VSIANIK CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROMN/O/f gTOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERNTOWNS SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 BRUSH JEANETTE JEROM£ JENNIE OVSIAN/K - 89 - 322 °o 604,( f 4 .° �( P N /0/ F LAND OF MIRES DI III AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / ' t° S.25° 47 '40"E. ° . I1526. 10' m cu° 255':t- /37'± /45'$ 125'3 /Do 125'' l25 //5'� - 403 _ KEY MAP g N= Oi ♦q9O NO SCALE ' 40, oo dl i nl d' t YI o V N� 40000 Iti ¢Iooa`UF+ tI 9,OncoCr'_* *14-4, 000D "I' ''f- 000�+ oDoo°'S w 00 e t ''t' •t �I fl //03¢a5 o�'+r� '� Nn p �Si.2-O 7z-"210xa6$-mO'5z�o..0"-E 9 .45' �zk) -Si\iO. 2-afxrr __Wrr7ZQ' '00"=�E , 00 _ L0 . Jm 400,2 N N /O/F 11 O ROBERTA HERING ° /25D —n /25 ' /25' N/O/FOP � =S P //5- � JANET DAVIS SRo A N.26"05'40"W. 306.31 ' SEE Q- SCLE C . A MAPLE AVE . PRIVATE ROAD ) N/0/ F BANEY OVSIANIKR2o /3at JOIZB JENNIE OVSIANIK 40040000d0 0 4004 ?C9 z IN 0 N 3 J ° N Q O 155 /Z5 50 .. / r N. 26 " 02' 30" W. - - - -- -' - N 2077. IB' N h I N N /0 / F LAND OF TOB IN TOTAL AREA = 35.7022 acres MVI 4 1090 N/O/F BLDG . ZONE DISTRICT A — C OWNERS n ' - - ' G `V FRANK A. CIECH ROBERTA HERIN SCHOOL DISTRICT :T ANOWICZ 171 s S CLUSTER PLAN OF PROPERTY � FIRE DISTRICT: 28 AND W' THOMAS ROME AT SOUTHOLD (10 MAPLE AVENUE SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 SEC. A h c/o BRIARCLIFF TOWN OF SOUTHOLD r aNDS� N,D,F MAIN ROAD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. �S. MET, HL I i"P' Q PECONIC ,. N. Y. 11958 JANET A. DAVIS b/w9. O HEP. RY E . R A1000 075 _ YOR � Al26° 05 40' W. - 3olP.3/ 02 - 06 d 09 CCqP°(°^ . J ML r JAMESPOR T'' N.Y. 11947 NT ^ Rr qI R a. r,e edgrny �, $PUT RM FENp6.�/' ^a N/O/F JANET DAVISSCALE 49610 JO Naz SEPT. t2,'• 1.9 90' OF NE'N a _. - - 4' �' F- 27 "� n Nov. 3, 1989 --- � ' a "MAPLE AVENUE"' NZ`' w. '�� 6¢.22 Q �. Nov. 1, 1990(revise) PECONIC SURVEYORS , P. C . h "' (PRIVATE ROAD ) ( 516 1 765 - 5020 �J\'�a ('O P.O. B Ox 909 N/O/F I THOMAS/O,FIEROME N/O/F '�\ N/O/F CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROM MAIN ROAD JAMES G. 6 MARY K. BREWER 6 i BARNEY OVSIANIK TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERNTOWNS SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 BRUSH JEANETTE JEROME I 6 - - JENNIE OVSIANIK 89 — 322 FO t fy(I \9 - N /0/ F LAND OF MIIRESDIZIK AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �O S. 25' 47'40" E . " S.250 43'40"E. o- 1526.10' 240 2A17"- 2.3r,' zzZ "- 0 3 KEY 'MAP Z jV Oz o NO SCALE, ° Kl O I O w O y1 O O O O O QN mo ♦� P N OIT ❑I I qll � 1 MN �"- X41 d+ x, d+ / g z 80,000 - h 80 00Q - 80 000 ' 90,000 d± . �}QOOD �A n In N m M M 527'16'50'E. z ¢ z10o Q h y° b0 93.45 ' �1 S.25p 7100'E. ; s 0 N M ro 117. 0' +I /O5 w no s 3 N /D/F /y N * N 9{�I�--��u� C_RORERTA HERING Li t� V1 s 2 }p= o � 80O000oi.+ yi / all m, P41'� _ 2411+ 241 + 240± �4 � o � N/o/F N —j — " o ry p P O S D Roll D 230 ZZZ' + {p JANET A DAVIS N. 26^03'40" W 306.31 ' I y •� 237 N a 242': MAPLE AVE . ( PRIVATE ROAD ) N/0/F Q Z O q OA1 I BA flNEY OVSIANIK Q O /5 1.4 IS / ,eVEO N JENNIE OVSIANIK � . m 80000 " 1 gOo00Q1{ M I Q xl PA1PK �O,000dIS M / 0004/+ m � Ooo d/t Br? O60 '80000"' P Z W AI Al mw Z1111 295'+ 8353 y /Do /191$ 1 50 bd 37,5 237 '+ 23-7'-' 242 N. 26!'02' 30"W. _ - 2077. 18 ' � N � N h N /0 / F L A N D OF T 0 E I N YIELD/� PLAN OF PROPERTY BLDG. ZONE DISTRICT : A - C OWNERS AT SOUTHOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT : 5 FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ III TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TOTAL AREA = 35 .7022 ACRES FIRE DISTRICT 28 AND THOMAS JEROME MAPLE AVENUE SUFFOLK COUNTY,N.Y. . SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 _ _ 1 c/o BRIARCLIFF 1000 075 02 - 08 9 09 r— _ 328aq - - - - MAIN ROAD qp 1 PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 SCALE I° = 100 ' /SS'�✓RBQX_O,5-->K �42. _ /SSS 6f_S r�-.�C✓_>`C = 32 �O59p / HENRY E. RAYNOR JULY 6,, 19JC DEFP i P.O . DRAWER A 5p AND SL - ,�-4; 5o0°' " CSEL_cAIAI& AKEA JAMESPOR , N.Y. 11947 I T . N A. � l _ a Y. S. LIC. NO. 4966,8 LILI ANN. - 9 1990 ^ SOUTHOLD TV LlmAiN ONIC W � �' �. I 9 ,�` _ PLq'I@I g RDA D 6')''76' ?F ��0,� OQ' ., ., B,6x F NENN 1CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROM ROAD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTERN TOWNS.THO;LD ',, 'N,Y. 11971 I 89 - 32 2 �1 f C� 9L fe<L (1 p° N /O/ F LANA OF MIR ES'DI ZIK AND TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - 2 r° S.25° 47'40"E. "" S. 25. 43'40"E. tv /25't i0o' m o � N w © " �J3a KEY MAP e.. h /}O,DOD� N O wN � p a� NO SCALE ° N _N - 4} ) 00 + nl N n N� 90 000'" ti / IObD� t F, 4aPco dr+ X144 000A'r 44, o0o d v 80000 vi o o f W 0 h t�j �'/ y N m m h S.27°16 '50"E. 0 i Q N O /lodt '7 93.45' "' 5.25• T'00"E, a °o 40000 ± 117. ' � � � N ". h" " N /I g O_ ROBERTA IF HERING 2oo'f 0 0 `I /25'f 4 M .. n a v J OPCN in a S P / ! C E $ 25- Z5'* 25 " LL n N/O/F Q - - N y r Q • 'b" JANET A DAVIS li � PD N 125fi "' SES RoA0 N N.26.05'40"W. 306.31 ' MAPLE AVE . ( PHI VATE ROAD ) /38 'f /go s TI _ Z /DD N/O/F Q Q Ci M BA RNE/D IANIK O JENNIE OVSIANIK.h QD oOiVr .r O��i+ ki l w OI 'tiI (n �O oOC f \ �OOO - O ,+ YI 3 0 0 H - , �000 - a 4011:1.0 p % w ¢ O N D N N N N R 0 O M h .mw Z M � - N w G F J O N oo z E i In Z i R N o a z � o m bd - /oo + 200' //5 't /2o'f /¢O't /38't /53 N. 26 ° 02' 30" W. 2077. 18' — — -- � N .A N N N N � N /0 / F L A N D OF TOB I N � BLDG . ZONE DISTRICT A - C OWNERS TOTAL AREA = 35. 7022 ACRES SCHOOL DISTRICT : 5 FRANK A. CIECHANOWICZ III AND CLUSTER PLAN OF PROPERTY FIRE DISTRICT: 28 _ THOMAS JEROME MAPLE AVENUE AT SOUTHOLD LD , N.Y, 11971 c/o BRTOWN OF SOUTHOLD c/o BRIARCLIFF MAIN ROAD N- PECONICE,. RAYN1958 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. O SI4r U L'd, P. O. DRAWER A 1000 075 - 02 OB 8 09 ME - - 4\, - JAMESPORT`, N.Y. 11947 1 SCALE I - 100 v 4kr NOV- 31 1988 PEC ONiC S". ,%pEY0R5 , P. C . ( 516 ) 765 - 5020 L�9< 231990 P.O . BOX 909 CONTOUR LINES ARE TAKEN FROM MAIN ROAD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIVE EASTER14TOWNS - SOUTHOLD , N.Y. 11971 ' 89 - 322