Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-75.-1-16 14.126 i2,87,-9c _.-----.. .-- --- SEAR 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance I I Project Number coz-pet.-290 Date November 15. 1988 i This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Board as lead agency, , has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change of Zone for l George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos SEQR Status: Type I ❑ Unlisted G� I Description of Action: To change the zoning on applicant's premises from its present (A) Residential to B-1 General Business District. • I Location. (include street address and the name of the municipality!ddun;p A location map of appreprieR Scale i5 a1sc recommended.) Located at Main Road, Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. See also attached map. SEOR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: I see EAF Part II and III attached A change of zone for this parcel alone would result in a significant imapct on the environment. As the Part III statement i reveals, the Town would put itself in a position of vulnerability with - - respect to other pre-existing non-conforming properties throughout the Town. This proposal would also be in contradiction with the adopted Master Plan and constitute spot zoning. I£ the Town wishes to further i consider this zoning change it should cause a generic EIS addressing the above situations to be prepared by the applicant. II I I �I II For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: I Telephone Number: i A Copy of this Notice Sent to, Commasioner. Department o' Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany. Nev; York 12233-00;J p.ppropriaLe Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation-Stony Brook, N.Y. Office cf the Chiet Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located. Appiicant (if any) Other involved aeencies (if any) Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Town Clerk's Bulletin Board KEY MAP SCALE 1" 600 ' P E 1 _ a Part 2—PRO&T IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGOUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question:'Have my responses and determinations-bee reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl- i asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold o magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State an, for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative an, have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider lcog term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower-than example, check column 1. — — - - -- d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the protect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 2 3 , Small to ( Potential Can Imp,-.ct Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change '.]C N0 ';ILS Examples that ++oui(i apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ (, `Yes —No foot of length), or v:here the general slopes in the project area exceed 10?0 • Construrtion on land where the depth to the water table i� less than U1'es rf.'e 3 fCP[ • ConStructlon or ; n+t'd pari;ing area for I,w;o c, n ort VChKICS Ci trt Lit ^ Or %+r....r fo(JrOI{. IS e< \6 tll�t c ;e'inue tur n•or� th.,r� ? +var it in�nl�c rn c,n — '— r — j 7 CnP i r'l+r- ur C ' — u l ._'� _,A c +v. , r( n, — i _ rr,(k or .`UfItr • - .Uui t-.,n „ �;ri n...� , r,i Sanillry I,vulirl -- — • r ,CL-:YJi ;I�n ;ii .I C -•i:!11;.'0:! IIt10(It1 aA _ � — ' '.%ill then, hr an eii(ct t . . .,t u;..que or unusual land form. round on Th" "Ic' (I e., r Iitts dunes, g;,logical formations, etc.).X.\o =1 E S • �;,eclnc land forns --- ❑ r'1es —No — _- 6 t[D 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [3NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. - - ❑ ❑ -- ❑Yes -0No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? SINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts. ---- --- - -- ..- - -- - - - - -{3 --- -----0-- --Dyes --DNO _ 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? $NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Dyes [-]No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO gallons per minute pumping capacity • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑NO supply system. • Proposed fiction will adverse',, affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be convea.-d off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ [--)Yes ENO do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Propoeed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No day • Proposed oct,on still hl cl. r;.ur siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑'No existing bodv of wars to it e extu .1 that there will be an obs ious sisual eon,trast 'C natura; conditions • Proucsed .Action wit; requrr the storage of petroleum o: chemical ❑' ❑ —Yes No products g,eaeer than '1.100 gallons • Prop^"ed Action will allor•. residential uses .n areas .+it'nout .cater ._ ❑Aes . No and c se�ser services • PrOpr,sed Action locatescommercial and or industrial u,es which map ❑' - ❑yes i-�o require ne.% or expan�mn Of exrSUng waste treatment and Or storage facilities _ • Other impacts _-- — ❑ ❑ ❑sec _:No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or urface i water runoff? XNO -NIS Ea, sples teat would appy to column ? • Pin h^scd Action would change (;ood water ilows ❑ r_. ❑1'es ❑No 7 1 2 3 • Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes [--]No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air qualityl [ENO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 13 No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed - ❑ - ❑ -- _ ❑Yes _❑_ No_ to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ®NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Remova• of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ Dyes [--)No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • 'Other impacts' ❑ ❑ ED Yes ❑No 9 V, 1i Proposed Action substan•ially atfect non threatened or non-endangered specir,' ZINO DYES Examples that would appy to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere vi:h any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑V-es ENC, mig•zto,� fish. shekh,.h or wildhi( species - • Propcned Action requires the removal of mere than 10 acres [J [ ❑les ❑No of nature forest (oyer 100 dears u ages or other localh ir:;ortzn: �e}`r taimn IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Io V', X if'. . Pruptned A( :ton attoct agricultural „rid reaources2 %'NO 1 1 5 [ramplcs that ssrnJd apply to column 2 • lhr prppowd aetu,n ssould sever, cross or limit access to agr,cultural [ C u\es ['N'o land (includes cropland. haNfrelds. pasture. vinesard, orchard, etc I — ,_ 8 FCanImpact SmallT2_ ntial Be Moderrge By Impaact ange • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO agricultural land - • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. — -+ The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ -- ❑ - --DYes----ONo- --- lard management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping), or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? MNO OYES (If necessary,-use-_the Visual EAE_Addendum in Section 617.21, -_ - ---- __7 - - __Appendix B.) - ---- - Examples that would apply to column 2 - • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether rn-n-made or natural • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No a,­hetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their e �,ment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Pr-:,ject components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑)'es ONO screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 " ill Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or pajcontclogrcal importance? -ZINO OYE5 Examples that woulc apply to column 2 • Proao5ed Acticr, occu•nnt v.holh or partialh within or substantlalis ❑ ❑ LheE ! __r tc, ar% ;cc,;,', r or Natrcoal ReF •.: c r c[c:n, V arc • Imp t0 or, archaeai( c:ra: "lo- Or Ir.>:I t". lo;ate; t+vthin the c: silt • f'� nC1JOrt v,rl! C_ Cu: In ar area Ic _ !n\'enicr� . IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION I ii t'r Ill PrOpo , d AE tlon aur-u the quanii!% or qualrtN of esrsting or future open spaces or re,feational opportunmesr ExamPles that v.Ould IPPIN to ^ohtmn 2 _WNO C)'ES • the permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity ❑ ❑ ❑)'es EN • A. major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 1 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ❑NO ®YES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts _An increase in traffic generated by ❑ Q ®Yes ❑No - this site would occur. IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ZINO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of 7 ❑ Dyes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ 1:1 Yes ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. - • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or -vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? RNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No facility • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ [Dyes []No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑ye, ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ [Dyes F-1 No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 will Proposed Action affect public health anc safety' ff'KO Examples that v.oe-1d le eolumr 2 • Proposed Action iraN causr a risk of explo,ion or release o' F6Z2rdoU1 ❑ teles Substances (i e. oil, pe.sticidrs rzcl. .!:ol etc ) in the ever! of aecl.dee? o: upset condition,. or there max be a chronic Ice+ lesel dacha,f• or emscion I • Proposed Actior. mzs re.suh in the burial of hazardous esastesin ans ,_ � D)es ❑Nc !corm fir toxic, poi,ornus high!% reacn: t rad,oacl:ve, irwaiirg. crier Vous. c;r j • Storago facdow, for one m:;hon or more gallons ni liquified natural ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ao gas or other tlammable liquids • Proposed anion rias result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑' ❑yes ❑r`0 within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste • Othor impacts-. ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑No 10 1 . 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. — +- Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ a ❑Yes [RNo • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ® Dyes ®No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ® Dyes ®No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes EJ No • Other impacts:_ ❑ ❑ [-)Yes ❑No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? IDNO ❑YES As of 10/17/88 If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 87efIv describe the impact. 2 D,scribe(if applicable)ho%v the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project changc,>) 3 Based on the information available, decade if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To ansv.er the question of importance, (onside: • Thr probabihtl of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • L'c irreversibilht�, including permanenth lost reso.jices c'. value • Whether the impact can or will be contrroll,-d • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether knoNNn objections to the project relate to this impact (Continue on attachments) 11 PART III George Kokkinos and Steven Tskoanos Change of Zone Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: The proposed action will conflict with the officially adopted Master Plan and the proposed zoning for the Town. It will also cause a change in the possible density of land uses as well as the permitted allowable uses. An important precedent will be set for future change of zone requests similar nature where pre-existing non-conforming buildings exist on site* . It would lead to pressure from other landowners to request the same type of spot zoning change. Clearly this is not the intent of the existing or proposed zoning or of the Master Plan. * This type of precendent would require a generic environmental impact statement. Impact on Transportation A change in zone would permit a number of new uses to be proposed that could be significantly more intense than the existing uses and that could generate significantly more traffic. o�UFFO!_k�;c Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Un P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 1 1971 ��j Y+�� TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD November 1, 1988 Southold Town Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Change of zone petition of Kokkinos and Tsokanos SCTM #1000-75-1-16 Dear Supervisor Murphy, In response to Kevin McLaughlin' s letter of October 18, 1988 regarding the above named application, the Planning Board wishes to note for the record that it adopted the Master Plan document on December 2, 1985. Therefore, its comments to the Town Board regarding the inconsistancy of this proposed rezoning to the Master Plan are not considered inappropriate. Very truly yours, ZBe ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN VS/jt ATTORNEY AT LA 828 FRONT STREET,P.O. BOX 803 ;l GREENPORT, NY 11944 (516(477.1016 U soul" ID TOWN PLpNNINGB ARD October 18, 1988 Southold Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos Change of Zone Application SCTM #1000-75-1-16 Dear Ms. Terry: I am in receipt of the Planning Board' s letter of October 18 , 1988 , wherein it recommends that the above-referenced application be denied. The basis of the Planning Boards recommendation is the proposed Master Plan' s zoning for this parcel. To base a re- commendation upon proposed ordinances which may never be adopted is both erroneous and unlawful. The realities of the situation are that this parcel is , and has for a substantial period of time, been used for business purposes. These uses include the rental of one of the buildings to the Town of Southold. The proposed change of zone merely validates that which already exists. Any denial of this application based on the proposed Master Plan is contrary to the law and will be treated as such. Ve4trulrs 'nU Jg JKM/lmt cc: Southold Town Planning P �FFOur,, D T LD cn RECEIVED S OI r lib Y DEC 2 4 1985 Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 December 24 , 1985 TO: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Ray Dean, Highway Superintendent FROM: Southold Town Planning Board RE: Land Use Plan Transmitted herewith is a certified resolution of the Planning Board adopting the Land Use Plan of the Proposed Master Plan. Pursuant to Section 272-a of Town Law, also transmitted is a Land Use Plan endorsed by the Chairman, for filing in your office. Attachments dms P ��FFO(k D T LD RECEIVED S Y DEC 2 41985 or r Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD, AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD DECEMBER 2, 1985 : RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board adopt and authorize the Chairman to endorse the Land Use Plan of the proposed Master Plan, dated November 27, 1985 in accordance with Section 272-a of Town Law. Diane M. Schultze, Secretary poses proJeCL area. Lae JCUyc at,u mcg+ vu—wsj .+••�..�� �.- _____ ___ __._ results of the sensitivity assessment. A rationale for the testing should be clearly stated. Any areas of prior disturbance should be clearly documented. M FDu(�o� OCT I 11996 < ITF Town Hall, 53095 Main Road .r0 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY T TELEPHONE (516)765.1801 TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 7, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos requesting a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-1" General Business District, at Route 25, Peconic. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations, and transmit the same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment mom LVTHOLD OCT, 4 �CASE. NO: .... jJ.... STATE CF NEW YORK �iold t""" � PETITIO TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR A CHANGE, MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDIN- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. ....................... ...................................................... TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, .George Rolckinos. and Steven residing atPeconi ,,,Lane coni„ 4 . . . r... @... . . 4 (insert name of petitioner).....7sd'kands Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at "................................................•••......... and more particularly bounded and described as follows: See Exhibit "A" annexed hereto.. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,. Including the Building Zone Maps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: To change the zoning district on said property from residential (A) to general business district (B-1) . F 3. Such request is made for the following reasons: The premises presently are improved by three buildings. The building variously house a garage for the Town of Southold, a canvas shop with an apartment upstairs, a florist shop and a storage area. All such uses are valid preexisting business uses. The change to a business zone would merely recognize the situation as it exists, that the property is, and has been for a substantial period of time, utilized for business purposes. J v (L. S.) .. � GEORGE K KKINOS S EVEN TSOK OS STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) George Kokkinos and Steven.Tsokanos., both BEING DULY SWORN', deposes and says that the re ""'they have x7FK the petitionetsin the within action; that-VXK-4MX read the foregoing Petition and kno%,X- the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged ou information and belief, and that as to those matters XBR�iKXMIC it e to be true. n R GEORGE KOKKINOS (L. S.) •.......... Sworn to before me STEVEN TSOKANOS =oe.e .. ' thi . day of f. . . ..., 19.88. Notary Public. LAU f1*0 Public,State E E of ENo w York Ro.1821818,SUNG&courny �^D�S '*a 30,1888 SCHEDULE A— Description TITLE No. 8608-731432 ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the westerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) at the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and which said point is also the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Lillian A. Goselski; RUNNING THENCE North 40 degrees, 171 , West•253.80 feet to a foundation monument; RUNNING THENCE North 49 degrees, 54' , East 188.80 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE the following 2 courses and distances: (1) South 37 degrees, 54' , East 181.24 feet to a monument; (2) South 40 degrees, 09' , East 47.57 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE along the west side of Main Road, South 42 degrees, 00' , West 182.80 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. e DESCRIPTION TOWN BOARD, TOWN OFSOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of GEORGE KOKKINOS and STEVEN TSOKANOS NOTICE to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: Lillian A. Gozelski 6 Orton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 Frank Chichanowicz III 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request change of zone from resa.dential to a general business district (B-1) . 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: Tax Map No. 1000-075-01-16 , Main Road, at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A zone (Residential — Agricultural) - 4. That by such Petition,the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: B-1 Zone (General Business) 5. That within five days from the date hereof,a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted,a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board;that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Travel er-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: 1988 1988 GEOR / OS d VEIN SOKANOS 2 tionery 1,- Post Office Address: 828 Front Street, PO Box 803 Greenport, NY 11944 (516) 477-1016 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ADDRESS NAME Lillian A. Gozelski 6 Orton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 Frank Chichanowicz III 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 STATE OF NEW YORK : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss.: Laurie E. Graeb residing at Old Jule Lane, Mattituck, NY being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3rd day of October 119 88 deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov .-named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were Mailed at the United States Post Office at Mattituck, New York ;that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) 4agonoo mail. LAURIE E. GRAEB Sworn to me t4is 3 4odayfto 1, 1. 1(/VIN �cLAUGHLIN Noy Kit. l::;a Cf New York Q�Llifi.d in Alt_ny Corr.ty My cammissi:n Exy' + �•C• 1 a 14-16-2 (2187)-7c 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 r PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant eff on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considei as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additio information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invo new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAME OF ACTION _ Proposed change of zone for George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) aX ap umber Main Road at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-075-01-16 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR _ J. Kevin McLaughlin, as attorney BUSINESS TELEPHONE gnE*P (516) 477-1016 ront Street, PO Box 803, — CITY/Po Greenport STATE ZIP CODE NAME OF OWNER(If different) NY 11944 George Kokkinos and Steven TSokanos BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS Main Road CITY/Po Peconic STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION NY 11958 Change of zone from (A) residential—agricultural to B-1 (general business Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial IBCommercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farn ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 . 0194 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acresacres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces . 33 acres . 33 Other (Indicate type) lawn area • 67 acres acres 6 7 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes KlNO a. What is depth .to bedrock? (in feet) 2 " 5. Approximate percentage of proposed pct site with slopes: 00-1 o% 100 % 010-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes NNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes IJNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes [XNO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes NNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes (XNO According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) ❑Yes LXNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes INNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes LXNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? X]Yes ❑No a) If 'Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Mes ONO already connected b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [Dyes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes ®No - 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes dNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes 1XNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 . 0194 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1 - 019 4 acres initially; 1 - 0194 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) 182 . 80 feet e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: n/a One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately existing i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest J "Mcl structure 2 StO J)eight; 56 width; 80 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 182 . 8 ft. 3 2. How much natura. material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? n/a 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No KIN/A tons/cubic yards a. If yes, for what intend.:;: purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n/a acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes INNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No year. 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes INNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/a ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project _ n/a 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes LXNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes INNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? )C]Yes ❑No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes MNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes ®No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? MYes ❑No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons — less than 1 b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? MYes ❑No c. If yes, give name Southold Town Land Fill ; location Peconic d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes nNO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes ffNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ITNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes IINNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes INNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes ®No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes INNo If Yes, explain 4 -� 125. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ®Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes INNo -- City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes INNo City, County Health Department ❑Yes INNo Other Local Agencies ❑Yes INNo - — ------ Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ®No State Agencies ❑Yes ®No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: Dizoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other — 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? presently zoned A — 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? present use — 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 General Business District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? same as present use 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? KlYes ❑1` 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? Eyes El 1- 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a _ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? _ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes Lit, 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, polic fire protection)? ❑Yes [NNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ON a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adver impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the inf r do provi Qve is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spon r e ev n M ghlin Date c__i_ Signature Title Attorney and Agent If the a ion is i he Coastal Area and you a e a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceedi, with this-assessment. 5 - I I \\ \ KEY MAP SCALE I' = 600 O OP P t < �P N \ 90 s \ J c� h _ - 1000 075 01 O — \ o e \00 / (p 15.1 LILLIAN A. GOZELSKI 6 ORTON DR. EAST NORTHPORT,N.Y. 11731 16, AGNES REINHART C/O HOWARD REINHART 107 LONG BEACH RD. _ ST. JAMES, N.Y. 11780 1 17.1 FRANK CHICHANOWICH III 180 MAIN ROAD , PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 17.2 _ FRANK CHICHANOWICZ 111 180 MAIN ROAD, PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 e 18.1 CURT W. 8 ANO MEYHOEFER P.O. BOX 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD � A\ N. N.Y. 11971 . 80X. 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD,18.2 — CURT W. 8 ANO MEYHOEFER P.O Y. 11971 . Q 90 os ' \ 19 STANLEY B. BERKDSKI 8 WIFE MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY. 11971 O — em „�° \� 20 BARR VINEYARD LTD BOX. 287 , CUTCHOGUE , N.Y. 11935 I S as 1000 - 075 - 06 h 6 3. — JOHN G. SCOTT , III 8 WIFE ,BOX. 545 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, P , N. Y. 11958 sDo' ah 4. — EDWIN SLIVONIK PECONIC N.Y. 11958 rP P e m� cl• 5 — VERONICA STANKEWICZ 8 ORS RFD MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD , N Y 11971 6 _ APOLONIA STANKEWICZ . RFD , MAIN ROAD , SOUTHOLD , N. , 11971 I 9h 12. — ROSE SABOTKA , BOX 255 , PECONIC N.Y 11958 00 '' 0 1000 - 086 - 01 - 10.9 — SIMON EST CHARLES J. C/O ELIZABETH WURTZ BOX. 122, HORTONS PT. , SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 _50D 1 e I C sJ ode 00, �\ s 1 RADIUS MAP FOR �P GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS 0. AT PECONIC \\ oTOWN OF SOUTHOLD \., � � 5 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000 - 075 - 01 - 16 SCALE 1" = 60' JULY 13, 1988 AREA 1. 0194 ACRES \ \ APPLICANTS O GEORGE KOKKINOS 8 \ O \, STEVEN TSOKAN 435 E oe O 9O �� PECONECC , N. YA1 58 P X99 A. AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL I OO HEREBY CER3FOE THCCAM 11V1J DUILD/NG ZONE DISTRICT THE RADIUS MAP DOES (/RATELY DESCRIBE THE USES OP T'HE,PROPERTY Q' SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 SURROUNDING THE SU 4CT PREMISES \ AS OF � FIRE DISTRICT 26 'LA 1 `4o�A. 1, b N.S LIC. NO. 49668 T p� RS + .C. P.1 0. + 'YogQA66 A SOUTHOL ®F W I 6 86 - 668 B D.K.