Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-06/18/1970MINUTES SOUTHOID TOWN BOARD OF APPEAT~ June 18, 1970 A regular meeting of the Eouthold Tow~n Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday~ June 18, 1970, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs. Robert W. Giltispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr.; Serge Doyen, Jr.; Fred Hulse, Jr. Also present: Howard Terry, Building Inspector PUBLIC NEARING: Appeal No. 1311 - 7:30 P.M. (E.D~S.T.), upon application oF Je~seph D. Zaiser, Mill Creek Drive,-Somthold, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Eoning Ordinance, Article ZZI, Section 300, Subsection 6, For permission to locate carport (accessory use) in front yard area. Location of property: east side of Mill Creek Drive, ~outhold, New York, bounded north by Wm. J. Miller, east by Mill Cre~k, south by P. Forestieri, west by Mill Creek Drive. Fee paid $%.00. ~thold Town Board oF Appeals -2- June 18~ 1970 The Chair~ opened the hearing by rea~ing the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, afFida~vit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, '-~d notice to applicant. THE CHAIR~: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? ~R. EAISER: Tes, I am Joseph Eaiser. I built the carport. THE CHAIR~: You apparently applied £er a building permit on Nove~oe~ l, 1969. i~R. EAISER: I built the carport not knowing that a permit was necessary. An inspector came around and asked if I had a permit. I did not know I had to have one. I built it earlier. He came by in October. TEE C~IR~N: T~e Board of Appeals reviewed your application for a variance to build a carport in your front yard area and wrote you that inasmuch as you would not return to Southold until May 1970, the Board agreed to hold this ~atter over ~til you~ return. Tou have built a carport in the front yard area without a permit or variance. This requires a variance. The space between the building and the road is regarded as the front~ yard° I~gally, whether the house is on the water or not is beside the point. For legal purposes, the area between the building and the public high- way, or access, is the front yard area~ ~. ZAI~EE: This is a circula~ drive.., almost a private street. There~s very little traffic. THE CHA~M~: Y~ you attached this carport to yo~r house and kep. t oF£ the~ side yards, all you would need would be a Building Permit. ~e have a ~equirement: 2~ side yards- lO~ on one side and l~~ on the ~other side, with an open space between you and yeu~ neighbo~ at the house line. If you w~nt te build a garage and put it in you~ rea~ yard ~ea, there would be no p~oblem. Ym o~de~ Fo~ the Boa~d of Appeals to g~ant a structure in your front yard a~ea, you have to show unusual hardship - unique hardship~- and that it will not eha~ge the charzcter of the neighbez~hood. I don.~t think that you show unusual hardship or unique hardship because you are the same as everybody else. You are the ~me~ of a pie-s~a~d lot ~ud it seems to me that a carport in the fren~ yard will change t~e character of the neighborhood° MR. HOWARD TERRY, BUILDING INSPECTOR: There is one other one. We granted a.garage on that~street. ~o~thold Town Board of Appeals -3- June 18, 1970 , TEE OHA~RNAN: (Referring to map) We have a street here and berets the water. You a~e concerned about the water view, the people across the way looking at a backyard. You believe a carport is acceptable and a garage is not. MR. ZAL~ER: A garage would block everybodyls view. THE CHAIRMAN: Many people will be living there year round. ~R. ZAi2~ER: The people di~ectly across the street are living there year round now. I asked them how they felt about-it when I built the carport, llve been here since Spring of 1947. Thatts,~ quite a while. I wanted to be considerate of the neighbors. If you look out of a window you can see underneath the carport. THE CEAIRNA~-: Eoning is not a popularity contest. MR. ZAI~ER: Would it be all right if i got permission from everyone in ~the Circle? (Mr. Zaiser submitted pieties to the Board members), TEE CH~IRNAE: Identify the-pictures for the record. Exhibits A & B. Those are of-your carport. You only have erie car, You donlt want a double carport. You are on public property. MR. ZAI~ER: I am l0g over. I can rectify that. I'm sure I could get signatures from everybody over at Grove Road. TR~ CHAIRMAN: i would believe that a carport is less dis- tressing than a garage. People across the street would not be able to see the water at all. 2~R. ZAISER: I tried to line the carport up with the house. THE CHAIP~: Suppose your neighbor wants to sell his house and the ne~ people want a two-car garage? MR. GRIGONIS: If the fellow on the next lot wants a two-car garage, you would.have to take the case on it's merits as it stands right here. You canlt stipulate. I can~$ see how it would change the character of the neighborhood. I am inclined to agree with the applicant, if he move~ the c~vport off the road. ~. BERGEN: I am looking at the-pictures and I see your neighbor has curbing around the place. You donlt have any c~rbing. MR. ZA SER. I, have fieldstones Town Beard ef Appeals -4- Jmme 18, 1970 THE CHAIR~: Can you move the carport back a car~s length for safety sake? .You are backing out on the highway. You have a lot big enough~ that you can back out-on your own property. You can locate your carport differently. You could put it in the middle. You could back cut amd ge into the road head-on. MR. ZAP: Hew about backing into the carport? THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this~ application? (There was no response. ) T~E C~A_IRMAN: The carport should be moved 20~ from the road. Otherwise, the whole road is going to be a row ef shanties. MR. ZAI~ER: All the ether driveways are there now. ~People back out on-to the road. ~R. BERGEN: That is what we are trying to overcome. You all realize that traffic is getting-much heavier. ~e are trying te overcome backing out on to roads. THE CHAIR~AN: We cantt chamge what has happened in the past. MR. EAISER: Ne are talking about a Circle that, s like a dead-end street. Ttls a quarter of a mile around the Circle. You can,t ge fast. THE CHA]I~L~N: if there are ne ether questions, I am going to propose that this~¢arport be permitted as accessory ~se in the front yard ef Mr. Zaiserls home b~t that it be relocated 20t back from the read. You have not indicated hardship. (The hardship would be a topographical one). I~R. ZAI~ER: If I move it back it will be in the way of ne ighb ors. THE~ CHAI~j~Y: ~e think it is safer 20.~ back before it hits the highway. Another reason is that people live on the ether side of the street. The Eoning Ordinance calls for front yard- 40', backyard 30~, sideyamd 3%~. '%~nere are places where people value open space. MR. ZALEER: Rather than move it, I will take it down. Scuthold Town Board of Appeals -5- June 18, 1970 THE CHAIRMAN: I' am going to make a resolution that the application be granted providing the carport is located no closer than 20 ft. from Mill Creek Drive. Motion seconded by Mr. Bergen. I~. GRIGONiS: You might live here all year round. You might want-to put siding on the carport. Y~ it,s on the road, you would be blocking it badly. THE CHAIRtVAN: I am going to withdraw my resolution. There is no unnecessary hardship. I am going to move that the applica- tion be denied and that the applicant resubmit his application stating what the hardship is and hew it will not change the character of the neighborhood. I donTt believe this application is in proper form~ After investigation and i~spectien the Board finds that the applicant requests a variance for permission, to locate carport (accessory use) in front yard area located at Mill Greek Drive, Southold, New York. The Board finds that the applicant has built his carport too. close to the highway. There is ne legal reason for the applicant not to move ~he carport 20 ft. back from the road. The Board finds that strict application of the 'Ordinance will not produce practical 'difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance would, change the character of the neighborhood and would not observe the spirit of the Ordinance. 0~ motion by l~m. Gillispie~ seconded by l~m. Bergen, it was RE~OL~ that Joseph D. Zaiser,- Mill Creek Drive, Southold, New York be I~EI~IED, -without prejudice~ variance in. accordance with the Zening~Ordinance, Article ZII, Section 300, subsection 6, permission te locate carport (accessory use) in front yard area as applied for on property located east side of Mill Creek Drive, ~outhold, New York, subject to the following condition: Applicant is permitted to resubmit application indicating hardship and showing how it will not change the character of the neighborhe od. Vote of the Boa~d: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispte, Bergen, Gr igonis, Doyen. Southold Town Board of ~Appeals -6- June 18, 1970 PUBZ~TO ~IN~. Appeal No, 134% 7:30 P.M, ~E,D.B~T,}, upon appt=ca~lon ~of ~A~dreW Cyprus, 88-0~ 171st ~treet~ Jam~ica, New York, for a v~i~Ce in accordance with ~he Z~g Ordin~ce, ~ticle III, Section ~0%, for permission to build new one Family dwelling~with reduced Front y~d setback, locatio~ of property: south side of ~eund Beach Drive, Map~ oF Capt. Kidd Estates, part of ~ot ~, Mattit~ck, New York. Fee paid ~.00.. The Chairm~ opened the hearing bY ~ead~g. the ~oplication f~ a vari~ce, legal notice of hearse, affidavit attesting its publication in the official newspaper, ~ud notice ~e the applicant. T~ ~~: Zs there ~yone present who wishes to speak for this application? ~. ~OL~: Yes, ~ am RlcH~d Wandoleski of Riverside Eo~s. (~. ~Wandeloski shewed a pict~e ~oF the property to the Board). ~Let $13 weald Be te the west. The front y~d would be do~ll. ~ ~. ~G~: ~e sta~ on ~he east is on a l~e with the house ~ext dee~. ~ ~ C~~: te~d Beach Read bends right at the let. The east cer~er of yOUr proposed dwelling will be ~ line with the h~se. A very steep bac~ard~ ~is is eno ef the reasons fe~ the erig~al Eon~g Ordinate. ~ C~~:~ is there anyone present who wishes to speak agains~ this ~applica$ion? (There was no response) ~$er investigation ~d ~spection the Bo~d finds that ~he applicant requests permission ~e build new one family dWell~g with reduced front~ y~d setback located at south side of Beach Drive. ~ne setback te be reduced 20~ in order te a~y from hill, which would be d~gerous. Lot ~ is closer to the road than the others on the same street~ Lot ~13 to the w~ WOuld build en top ef hill. The east oF the p~oposed dwell~g would be in line with the house ~ext door. The Board finds t~t strict application of the 0rdi~ce would p~oduce practical difficulties or ~ecess~y hardship; t~ hardship created is ~i~e ~d ~Weuld net be shared by all p~oper- ti~ ali~ ~ She i~diate vicinity of ~his property and in the same use dmstrzct, ~d the v~i~ce will net change the ch~acter ef the nei~berheed, ~d will observe the spirit ef the Seuthold Town Bos~d e£ Appeals -7- June 18, 1970 On motion by Nr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED Andrew Cyprus, 88-05 171 ~treet, Jamaica, New York be GRANTED approval to build new one family dwelling with reduced fro~t yard setback on property located south side of Sound Beach Drive, Map of Captain Kidd Estates, part of ~Lot No. 14, ~iattituck, New York, subject to the following condition= This approval is G~ on condition that applicant maintain the adjoining line to the east. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. PUBLIC HEXRING: Appeal No. 1347 - 8:00 P.M. (E.D.~.T. I, upon application of James Warner, Paul Winters, and Nark F. Madale, 173 Oregon Road, Cutchogue, New York, for a special exception in accordance with Zoning Ordinance, Article r.r.L, Section 300, ~ub- section 5d, for permission to establish and-maintain stables for boarding amd riding horses. Location of property: land of Dominick Mavellia, neath side of Oregon Road, MattituCk, New York, bounded north by r.. ~I. ~eund, east by Graphic Arts Nanagement Oorp., south by Oregon-.Read, west by Vincent Zim~oski. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by-reading the applicatiom for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to the applicator. T~E CHAIPhM~N: is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? JANES WARNER: Yes, I am James Warner. HOWARD TERRY, BUIIDING INSPECTOR: Your address shows 'a Post Office Box number. The-correct address is 4055 Oregon Read. OW~iR ~MA~: Let the corrected record indicate No. 4055. ~. WARI\~ER: Before we put in an application, we talked to our adjoining neighbors amd the gentleman across the. street. The land he farms is adjacent to Red Riding Farm, north side of Oregon. They have all agreed we can use ~he back reads for trail ridi~g~ TW~ CHAIRMAN: I would suggest you get permission in writing. -8- Jv~e 18, 1970 ~. ~/ARNER: t/e are going to take precautions. There are 37 acres of trail and .graziug lead. ~ge have access to the beach. White sand is good for horses feet, Mark Madaio, my partner, has been in the horse business for seven or eight years. ! have been in Florida, worked at a' stable in Florida. Mark worked in Arizona. ~ The other fellow has been an instructor~ in training horses. THE CHAIR/MAN: There is a slight discrepancy. 'You say you will have 15 to 25 horses but I believe you told us you might take on some trotters. I~R. ~ARNER: 15 to 25 horses is an over-amount. I don~t feel that the location warrants that many horses° - THE CHAIRMAN: Isn't a riding stable a seasonal buszness. MR. WARNER: We have a sleigh for winter. We might have five or six rental horses in the winter and three or fou~ trotters to cover expenses. I have two private horses of my own. One, I am training- a Palomino; one is show material. THE CHAIRMAN: What is your interest in the property? MR. ~ARNER: We hav~ a three yea~ lease. We have an option to buy. All monies we pay into the leasing of the property will apply as an equity into the property. THE CHAIRMAN: The property is not in top-notch shape now. How will you confine-the horses? /~R. WARNER: ~$ith electrified wire inside the rail. %Se have a corral 20~ x 60~. It cost $170.00 to build. We will board up the front entrances of the barns. The winter barn will have an entrance on the rear. THE CEAIRI~u~: I suggest you get letters from your neighbors. Each neighbor who gives you permission to use an amount of acres. All ho~ses for hire must be ridden north of Oregon Road. I~l~. ~;AI~ER: We will not cross the roadl Stalls will be cleaned out daily. THE CHA/RMAN: Whenever a horse and rider leaves your stable an experienced rider will be with them? Yes. Southold Town Board ef Appeals -9- June 18, 1970 THE CHAtRNAN: I would suggest that yom talk with a lawyer to see that you are adequately protected. The Board of Appeals is obligated to say that the area permissible for riding is all north of Oregon Road. THE GRAY, MAN: A~e YOu willing to remove ma~ure once a week? MR. ~ARNER: We put menure in bags. Ne are not going to have more .than a 100 lb bag per week. THE CHAIRMAN: I believe that would be under the jurisdiction of the Board of Health. MR. T~Y: People will come looking for it. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application. (There was no response) After investigation amd inspection the Board fimds that the applicant requests permission to establish a~d maintain stables for boarding and riding horses under~thename of Royal Flush ~tables on land of Dominick Mavellia, north side of~ Oregon Road, Mattituck, New York. The facilities will consist of and include the following: 15 to 25 horses; sufficient stall areas; 37 acres trail and grazing land; capable staff on premises at all times. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the ·legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permamemtly-or substantially injured a~d the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. O~ motion by ~iv. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED: James ~ar~er, Paul Hinters, and Mark-F. M~dalo, 4055 O~egon Road, Cutchogue, New York, be GRANTED Permission for a two year period {subject to renewal)~to operate a horseback riding stable north side of Oregon Road, Mattituck, New York, subject to the following conditions: 1. i That applicator agrees not to offer horses for use south of Oregem Road. 2. That riding area to which this special excepti~ applies be that contiguous to property a~d that the authoroty to ride over this property be reinforced with w~itten permission. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Robert W. Gillispie, Bergen Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -lQ- Ju~e 18, 1970 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal Ne. 1346 - 8:30 P.M. (E.D.S.To), upen applicatien~of Pirates Cove Marine, Inc., Peninsula Road, Fishers Island, New York, for-a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article Iii, ~ection 300, and A~ticle X, ~ection 1007, ~ubsection b. & e. for permission to reconstruct non-conforming building and use same for business purposes, and create off-street parking for business in Residential-Agricultural "Ae District. Location of property: south side of Peninsula Road, Fishers Island,-New York, bounded north by Willard Maynard, Peninsula Road & Buckler, east by Darbies Cove, south by Richard Baker, Penin- sula Road & Rotar, west by ~est Harbor. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance~ legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. ~ CHAI~_M~N: this applicatiom? 2~R. E~WARD~: Yes, I am Norman Edwards. map). Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for (Please refer to the (The members of the Beard and Ym. Terry, Building I~spector re£erred to map). 2~R. DOv~I~: The adjacent land owners-are opposed to any increase of buainess activity ef any type. However, they are generailynet opposed to a marine supply store. They feel it would be advantageous to have the building renovated and cleaned up, and if the business would net create a parking problem. The applicant states this is his intention and he would be satisfied to be limited to this usage. THE CHAIRNA~: (Referringto map) This is the piece of Property under discussion? ~. EIY~ARDS: Ye s. ~A~. DOYEN: How many 30 foot boats could be stored-~abo~t four? With bulkheading you might~ add six more. Nould most of yo~ supplies be ~sed on beats Yom would not have people running in and out you are working all day? ~t~. ED~ARDS: That is right. Town Board of Appeals -!1- June 18, 1970 THE CHAIRI~kl~: Whether parking is adequate is a point to be considered. Offhand, it doesnlt look as though it is. MR. TERRY, BUILDING INSPECTOR: There is room between the building and the street. _Y_f you took. the fence off you could aceomodate three more cars. THE CHAIRNAN: I would think that one condition should be that the use of this renovated property, which would be 20~ x 30t, b.e confined to ma~ine supplies, not general hardware; strictly related to marine supplies and marine hardware. Two: that the renovated area be limited to 20~ x 30~ existing outline of building. Three: that additional offstreet parking be provided. MR. DOYEN: Ym other words, the outlined conditions-are what the majority of the surroumding property owners could live with. Beyond that, they would be opposed. T~ CNAIP~dAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this- applicat ion ? (There was no response) Af.t-~r investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests Permission to reconstruct men-conforming building and use same for business purposes and create offs~eet parking for business in Residential-Agricultural ,Am Distric~. The applicant is the owner of a non-conforming use property.- somth side of Peninsula Road, Fishers Island, Igew York - 130~ x 84~ multiple uses, consisting of two apartments which eve leased and one vacant apartment plus marine repair yard served b' y mar zne railway. The applicant Proposes to renovate the area, formerly used as an. apartment, for the purpose of selling ma~ine supplies and marine hardware in connection with his boat business. Approxi- mate size of renovated apartment would be 20! x 30! requiringaddzt:zonal' parking area for three cars under the present Ordinance. The Board finds that this space can be created by eliminating a small picket fence on the north side. 'The applicant owns two adjacent lots to the east of the property under application. The east lot being leased, while he, himself, lives on the adjacent lot to the east. The Board finds that strict application of the O~dinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does-observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. $o~thold Town Board ~ .Appeals -12- Yune 18, 1970 On motion by Er. Doyen, seconded by I~. Grigonis, it was RE~O~VED Pirates Cove Marine, Inc,, Peninsula Road, Fishers Island, New York, be GRAy, TED permission to reconstruct non- conforming building south, side of Peninsula Road, Fishers Island, N New York, and use same For business purposes and create off-street parking for business i~ Reside~tial-Agricultural "A~ District. The following conditions are required by the Board in granting this applic at ion: 1. The renovated apartment shall be used solely for the sale of marine supplies and m_~ine hardware. 2. The renovated area be limited to the existing size of the vacant apartment. 3. That three additional parking spaces be provided to the north side of the building as described in our findings. 4. That this permission be g~anted for a period of two years subject to review by the Board of Appeals. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. On motion by M~. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RE~0~VED that the decision on Appeal No. 1338, Frances ~eewald, Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York~ be postponed ~until July 9, 1970 in order to give Nassau Point Property Owners Association an oppo~tunity to file brief supporting their decision in the matter. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, i~ was RE~Or.VED on Appeal No. 1337, Katy Mitchell, 103 Tottenham Road, r.yn~rook, NeW York, that the Board of Appeals GP~I~T permission to divide lot and build a new one Family dwelling on the south side ~outhold Town Board of Appeals -t3- June 18, 1970 o£ Aquaview Avenue Ext., East Marion, New York. As requested, the Findings of the Board are in agreement With applicant. Vote of the Board: Doyen, Hulse. Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, On motion by Er. Gillispie, seconded by Er. Hulse, it was REEOLVED that the minutes of the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals dated Nay 29, 1970, be approved as submitted, subject to minor correction. Vote of the Boa~d: Doyen, Hulse. Ayes:- Messrs. Giltispie, Bergen, Grigonis, On motion by Mr. Gi!lispie, seconded by Er. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7~30 P.M. (E.~.T.~ Thursday, July 9, 1970, at the Town OFfice, Main Road, ~outhold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon applicati~ of Abe Goldrich, East Broadway, Woodmere, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article-III, Section 303, and A~ticle X, ~ection 1000A, for permission to bmild new one family dwelling with less than 100 ft. frontage. Location of property: east side ~of Bay Shore Road, ~ubdtvision Map of Peconic Bay Estates, Amended Map A, Lot ~*s 14 and 15, Greenport, New York. Vote of the Board: D~yen, Hu!se. Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, On motion by M~. Bergen, seconded by F~. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:$0 P.M. (E.S.T.) Thursday, July 9, 1970, at the Town Offiee, Main Road, ~outhold,.New York, as the time and place ef hearing upon applicatiea of George W. -Smith & Sons, Southold, .New York, for a varianc~ in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 307, ~outhold Town Board of Appeals ~une 18, 1970 for permission to construct addition to existi~g dwelling with insufficient sideyard area. Location of property: east side of Mailler Court, ~ubdivision Map off tmlthfield Park, Lot ~ 20, Southold, New York. Vote oF the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. On motion by Nr. Grigonls, seconded by F~. Gillispie, it was RE~0LVED that the Southold Town Board of ApReals set 8:00 ~.Mo (E.B.T.) Thursday, July 9, 1970, at the Town OTfice, Main Road, Eouthold,~ New Yo~k, as the time and place of hearing upon applica- tion of l~ry Bollman, Truman Path, East Marion, New.York, for a variance in accordance, with the Zoning 0~dinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article I, Section 1000A, for permission to-build new one family dwelling with less than 100 ft. frontage. Location of property: south side of Truman Path, East Marion, New York, bounded north by Trum~u Path, east by N. Bollman, south by Gardiners Bay, west by H. Foster. Vote off the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Hulse. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by I~. Doyen, it was HE~0LVED 'that the ~outhold Town Board of Appeals set 8.~30 P.M. (E.~.T.) Thursday, July 9, 1970, at the Town Office, 2~Iain Road, ~outhold, ~ew York, as the time and place of hearing upon applica- tion of Ralph T. P~eston, in~., Greenport, New York,-for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, ~rticle iii, Section 300~ for permission to use lot for storage of building materials, etc. Location of property: east side of Mauhanset Avenue, Greenport, New York, bounded north by 'Sterling Cemetery, east by Barbara Dow, south by Bt. Agnes Cemetery, west by Manhanset Avenue. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Eulse. motion by Mr.~D~en, seconded by Mr. Hulse! it was ~0LVED that the Southold-T°wn Boar~ of~ Appeals set 8:45 P.M. ThUrsday, JulyS9, 1770,I at the Town ~0ffz~e, Main Road, ~outh~old,.New Yor~, ~as the t~me and plac.e of nearing upon application Southold Tow~ Board of Appeals -15- J~ne 18, 1970 of Virginia E. l~ulcher, 7' Hatless Place, ~e~t Hempstead, New York, for a variance in accordance with Jthe Zoning Ordinance Article ii!, ~ection 303, and Article X, Section lO00A, for permission to set off lot with less than 100 Ft. Frontage. Location of property: private road off' south side of Peconic Bay Blvd., Subdivision Nap of Edgemere Park, Map No. 7~2, part of Lot ~ ~au~el, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis, Doyen, Eulse. The Meeting was adjourned at 10:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Marjorie Mc~)ermott, ~ecreta~y Southold Town Board of Appeals