The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMacari at Laurel Book III 1993 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,~.;...~- -- BOOK 3 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR MACARI AT LAUREL TYPE I ACTION This Document Represents A Final Environmental Impact Statement For The Above Referenced Project. copies Are Available For Public Review And Comments At The Offices Of The Lead Agency. Comments will Be Accepted Until IN ACCORDANCE WITH: Article 8 Environmental Conservation Law (8-0113) Part 617 Statewide Regulations (6 NYCRR) DATE: August, 1993 LEll.D AGE.L'1CY: APPL:: CAliT : Southold Town Plar~ing Bca=~ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New Yo=k 11971 Ccntac"t. Person: M-. Bennett O=lowski, J=. Phone: 516-765-1938 Jose;:: Maca::-i c/o Pe~er S. Danowski, Esq. 616 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead, New Yo=k 11901 PREPARED BY: LOCATION: Richard A. Jackson, Ph.D. 37 Brightwood St=eet Patchogue, N.Y. 11772 Bounded by Sound Avenue-Middle Road on the north and Lau=el Way (R.O.W.) on the eas~ and south in Laurel, Town of Southold, SUffolk County, New York ACCEPTANCE DATE: COMMENT DATE: 1 'I 1 1 1:",:') . ':, r; " n , f? n WI r "..... ,-,-,,""."j F', , ~ ~ I r " TABLE OF CONTENTS F.E.I.S. TEXT BOOK 1 INTRODUCTION 1 LIST OF COMMENTATORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RESPONSE TO COMMENTS I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOPIC HEADINGS: I SUMMARY II. I. III. I I I I 1 1 IV. 1 1 1 1 I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2. FLORA FAUNA .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. GROUNDWATER ............. WATER QUALITY SANITARY WASTE .......... . . . . . . .. . . . 3. . . . . . . . . . . . D. MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. TRAFFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES . . . . 5. CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND SCENIC RESOURCES ..... HISTORICAL RESOURCES .. .... . . . . . ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. PHYSICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. TOPOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2. FLORA FAUNA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c. HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. GROUNDWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i ---'--'-~-~---- . '",",\ ~,- -~~_.__._., 1 2 . . 2 3 13 13 13 27 32 32 32 39 40 40 40 41 41 44 44 44 46 46 48 51 51 /' I I I I I V. I I I I I I I I I VI. I VII. I I I IX. I D. 3. SANITARY WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. 7. 8. 9. TRAFFIC POPULATION MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. TAXES AND FISCAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MITIGATIVE MEASURES TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. . . . . . . . PHYSICAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. TOPOGRAPHY ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B. BIOLOGICAL SETTING............................... C. D. 1. FLORA FRESHWATER WETLANDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. FAUNA .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HYDROLOGIC SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2. 3. DRAINAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GROUNDWATER .................................. SANITARY WASTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MUNICIPAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L 3. POTABLE WATER SUPPLY ZONING, LAND USE, AND PLANNING AND OPEN SPACE CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, AND SCENIC RESOURCES HOUSING MATTITUCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.9.............. TAXES AND FISCAL SETTING ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 8. 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C. B. YIELD ALTERNATIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LAND ACQUISITION POTENTIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D. TRANSFER DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ",., GROWTH-INDUCING ASPECTS OF THE ACTION PROPOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii 62 84 84 85 86 87 88 88 88 90 90 93 99 10'0 100 103 106 107 107 117 136 141 142 144 145 145 167 169 178 181 182 .' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I / x. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS J.82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . REFERENCES CITED APPENDICES BOOK 2/3 COMMENTS ILLUS'!'ID~'!'IONS FIG,i'RE: J.. Location of Data Collection Stations: Quality of Groundwater ....................................-. - 37 2. S'~ S '~. 'ty M ~_e ens~,-~v~ ap.......... ...... ....... .. ... .. .. 43 3. Lot 18 of Proposed Action: Potential Layout ........ 45 4. Contributing Drainage Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J.02 5. Water Quality of Municipal Water Sour=e ............. 113 TABLE: 1. New York Sta~e Coas~al ?oli=ies ..................... 121 PLATE: 3. Site Plan - Modified Cluster Alternative ............ In Pocket J.;PPl:'ND!,C:::S APPENDIX: A. Town of Sou~~old Documents B. New York State Depa~~ent of Environmental Conservation Documents J.. Request for Wetlands Delineation of NYSDEC 2. NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Boundary Confirmation 3. NYSDEC Freshwater Wetlands Map and Classifications C. u.s. Army Corps of Engineers Request for Establishment of Potential Jurisdiction , , D. Soil and Groundwater Quality at the Macari at Laurel Site / E. Water and Nitrogen Budget Calculations iii . .. . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I G. H. I. J. K. L. F. Suffolk County Water Authority Documents Letters to Adjacent Property Owners Recharge Basin Information New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Documents Correspondence to Southold Town Planning Board, March 6, 1992 CUltural Resource Inventory, Stage II Traffic Study Supplement , , / iv I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX L TRAFFIC STUDY SUPPLEMENT I I I I I I; I I I II I I. I I, I' I I. I- I- "" _.,--"...,~""'.~,+~,~".,_. TRAFFIC STUDY SUPPLEMEN T OF MACARI AT LAUREL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MATT/TUCK, NEW YORK Pre pared by: EDWARD J. SHARSKY, P. E., P. C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS JUNE 1993 ,~ ,- -.' -,...<-., ,.. . '...c..;o;.;.. ... - ~ '-. . " -~----,-_.---':..-;.,y';.;.;..';.:.;..;;"f::..:.'.i~:,~.~._~~'...:...;;,."...:_.-. ;.,-._j~-- -~--' . ..........:.:.-.......... .-':':O:"''::"_,._.,....--.._j. . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I $/0../$4- l1'#tJltJl rff~ / ~. .9? rff. .9?~ ~-" <<~ ~7'.Y" '#I /tJltJltJl~J'~ ~ .4. ~.,~t. Jf/W ///&1' SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC STUDY OF MACARI AT LAUREL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MATTITUCK. LONG ISLAND June 1993 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S/o.?S#- d'4t7t7 ~~ -/ ~. .96:. .9-{!' &:... kr'y ~~ /t7t7t7~./~ ~ f-+a. .A/W //?d'd' MEMORANDUM REPORT TO: Richard A. Jackson, Ph.D. FROM: Edward J. Sharsky, P.E. Consulting Engineer RE: Supplement to Traffic Study of Macari at Laurel Residential Development DATE: June 3, 1993 This memorandum addresses the latest traffic comments re- ceived from Cramer. Voorhis & Associates concerning their review of the final Environmental Impact Statement. I will repeat their comments and follow with my response. D. Municipal Setting 4. Traffic Page 41 2. Comment: The comment requested information concerning seasonal increase of traffic volume on area roads. The response indicates that a worst-case scenario was utilized; however, contact with NYSDOT finds that for seasonal traffic based communities, August daily traffic may be as much as 15 percent higher than June traffic. The Traffic Impact Study does not make note of any seasonal variation whatsoever, and does not provide a worst-case analysis as is purported in both the Traffic Impact Study and the proposed Final EIS. D. Municipal Setting 4. Traffic Pages 84-85 1. Comment: The comment pointed out the discrepancy between the traffic study build out evaluation based on 2 years, and the Draft EIS project occupancy schedule based on 5 years. The response indicates "It is common to use a two year interval between existing and built conditions". While it may be common to perform analysis based on a two year build out, proper analysis would attempt to make the build out analysis year consistent with the specific project. In addition, the Traffic Study (Page 4; DEIS Appendix Dl, indicates that, "Traffic impact studies are intended to examine the worst case situation". Certainly projecting the growth rate over a longer period of time which is more consistent with the ex- pected build out year would constitute both a more appropri- ate methodology and a worst case scenario. The response should be modified to address the comment. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -2- D. Municipal Setting 4. Traffic Pages 84-85 2. Comment: The comment requested mitigation for a degradation of Level of Service from B to C at the intersection of Sound Avenue and Cox Neck Road. The response indicates, "A Level of Service C is very acceptable". The Final EIS should de- fine the Level of Service as regards intersection operation- al efficiency in support of this statement. It is argumentative as to whether or not traffic volumes, in the vicinity of the project site, are 15 percent higher in August then they are in June. There are no actual traffic counts made in the vicinity of the site which indicate that the situation occurs. This was verified by a telephone call and a letter to the New York State Department of Transportation inquiring about seasonal vari- ations in the vicinity of the site. In response, I received a letter from Mr. John A. Falotico along with a copy of the State's Seasonal Factor Group listing. A copy of Mr. Falotico's letter plus the Factor Group listing is enclosed with this memorandum. A further call to the state revealed that the seasonal factors are state wide and are general in nature. Factor Group 40, referred to in Mr. Falotico's letter, is defined as representing moderate seasonal variations in traffic. The relationship in Factor Group 40 between August and June mayor may not apply to the roadways in the area of the Macari site. The basic purpose of the traffic analysis is to determine what impact, if any, the Macari development will have on the roadway system. This impact can be determined in large measure by looking at traffic conditions with and without the project. It is the change in traffic conditions that is important. The change in traffic conditions will be the same whether or not the original June traffic counts are used or are increased by a seasonal growth factor. However, to put the matter to rest. two sets of analyses have been conducted and are attached to this supplemental memorandum. One set of analyses has compared existing conditions, as set forth in the original report, future no build conditions with a five year growth factor added. future five year conditions with Macari traffic added to the street system, and future five year con- ditions with Macari and all other project traffic added to the roadway network. The second set of analyses added a season variation factor to all four conditions: existing, no build, Macari. and Macari plus all other projects. Based on the data received from the state this was found to be 10.27 percent. Both sets of analytical procedures clearly showed I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -3- CAPACITY ANALYSES WITHOUT AUGUST/JUNE ADJUSTMENT SOUND AVENUE AND BERGEN AVENUE Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Southbound Left Right B A B A B A B A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects B B B B A A 1\ A SOUND AVENUE AND KIRKUP LANE Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Northbound Left Right B A B A B A B A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects A B B B A 1\ A 1\ Service Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A Service Westbound Left A A A A A A A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -4- CAPACITY ANALYSES WITHOUT AUGUST/JUNE ADJUSTMENT SOUND AVENUE AND COX NECK ROAD Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Southbound Left Right B A C A C A C A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects C C C D A A A A SOUND AVENUE AND MIDDLE ROAD Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Northbound Left Right B A C A C A C A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects B C C C A A A A Service Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A Service Westbound Left A A A A A A A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -5- CAPACITY ANALYSES WITH AUGUST/JUNE ADJUSTMENT SOUND AVENUE AND BERGEN AVENUE Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Southbound Left Right B A C A C A C A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects B C C C A A A A SOUND AVENUE AND KIRKUP LANE Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Northbound Left Right B A C A C A C A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects B C C C A A A A Service Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A Service Westbound Left A A A A A A A A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -6- CAPACITY ANALYSES WITH AUGUST/JUNE ADJUSTMENT SOUND AVENUE AND COX NECK ROAD Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Southbound Left Right C A C A C A D A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects C D D D A A A A SOUND AVENUE AND MIDDLE ROAD Weekday Peak Hour 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Level of Northbound Left Right C A D A D A D A Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects Saturday Peak Hour 12:00 N to 1:00 PM Existing Future with No Build Future with Macari Future with all projects C D D D A A A A Service Eastbound Left A A A A A A A A Service Westbound Left A A A A A A A A I I I I -7- I that the minimum amount of traffic resulting from the Macari project will not change any Levels of Service. Where changes in Levels of Service occur, they are the result of normal ambient traffic growth or the traffic generated by other planned developments. I In any case, any experienced traffic engineer, upon examining the very low volumes that will be generated by Macari, would come to the conclusion that the project would not effect traffic flow conditions and would not change any Levels of Service. The results of the capacity analyses, with the exception of existing conditions without a seasonal adjustment, are attached to this report. The existing conditions without an adjustment are contained in the original report. I I I Since there is no change in Levels of Service resulting from the Macari project, I:he Cramer, Voorhis & Associates comment with respect to the degradation of Level of Service from B to C at the intersection of Sound Avenue and Cox Neck Road is moot. In any case, an explanation of Levels of Service is contained in the original report which points out that Level of Service C is in the zone of stable flow. When new roadways are designed, they are most often designed to operate at Levels of Service C or D. As stated earlier, Level of Service C represents acceptable traffic conditions. Level of Service 0 also represents stable traffic flow even though speed and freedom to maneuver are restricted. Level of Service 0 is acceptable where this condition occurs only for a short period of time and is seasonal, which is the situation 1n the area of Mattil:uck where the Macari project is located. I I I I I I The additional traffic analyses conducted as part of this supplemental study l,ave reinforced the conclusions set forth in the earlier report. There is no evidence to indicate that the Macari at Laurel residential development will have any adverse impact on the roadway system or the surrounding communities. Respectfully submitted, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NEW YORK STATE TRAFFIC DATA I * '.' . l , - J 1,.. _, _ --J I I I JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIAII!:CTOR STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. N_Y. 11788 FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMleSIONE" I I May 13, 1993 I Edward j. 1000 Fort Northport Sharsky Salonga Road NY 11768 I I Dear Mr, Sharsky. This is in reply to your May 4, 1993 request for traffic counts, You asked for traffic counts on Route 25A from Manor Lane to Sound Avenue. I think you probably were referring to Route 25 rather than 25A. Therefore, I have enclosed the two counts requested for that segment on Route 25. Also enclosed is a copy of our Seasonal Factor Group (FGI listing. For that area of Route 25 we use an FG of 40, I Very truly yours, I rl::~A~T~~ Planning and Program Management Director I I Attachment I I I I I AN .EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .. " q III v :> 'I ~ tll l2: .... tIl l~ Izl ~ o C<: 0. f-o l2: ::> o ~ ~ .... t:. t:. 2 f-o N 0> 0> ... lk: o r.. tIl C<: o f-o t) <:: r:, ~ <:: l2: o In <:: Izl l~ ~ .... 0> 0> .... 0> III 0> .... tIl Izl f-o .... tIl lk: f-o <:: l2: o C Izl tIl <:: al ~ CJ Izl C "'0>... ONUl ....00> ........0 > o l2: UlOUl .......10 ....00> ........0 f-o CJ o 0>......., UlO>N ....00 ............ 0. Izl tIl .....1IlO> IOO>N ....00 .....1-tf""C tll ::> ..: OION .........10 ........0 ............ ~ ::> ~ 10 III 0 "'O>Ul ....00 ............ l2: ::> ~ ....00> Ill...,..... ........0 ............ >< <:: :c 0>......., 100..., ........0 ............ lk: 0. <:: 0... III NIIl... NOO> .......0 C<: ~ .......,Ul "'Ul..... ....0'" ........0 III Izl t:. ....Ul'" COON 000> ,........9 z <:: ~ ...,0..... ........0> OO\CX) ....00 ....00> "'...,N tllt:ltll t:.r..r.. Ul ..... o o Ul ..... o o III \D o . o 0> 10 o o ... Ul o o CO ... o .' o .... Ul o o CO \D o o \D ..., .... o '" ..... o o oJ:} ..... o .' o '" ..... o o C f-o tIl ...,...,..., "'100> 0> Ill..... 000 UlIO..... IIlNIO 0> 0> CO 000 100'" 0>""10 00'" ........0 "'010 ..........10 ....00> ........0 .......,Ul NOIll ""NO ............ NOCO CO Ill..... N....O ........... N....O .....0>.... ....00 ........... "'Ul..... ............ "'00> ........0 ......... UlNO> 00>..... ....00 ....N'" "'IIlN "'COCO 000 "'lI:I'" 0...,..... "'lI:I..... . 000 "'oJ:}lI:I lI:I....... lI:IlI:I..... . . . 000 ....00> ........., tll~tll Is. Is. Is. 0> Ul o . o . . 10 10 o o ... o .... o III .... .... . . o N o .... o .... lI:I o o lI:I oJ:} o o o '" .... o '" Ul o o Ul \D o o '" \D o o C f-o III o ..... o o UlNO> N....O> O>lI:IlO 000 ,..... ~." o III 10 o Ill..... ....00 Ulll:l.... 0>...,1Il "'0>1Il 000 10 III 0 100>..., 00>0> ....00 NIIl'" 00>0> .......... ........... lO.....lI:I 0>0.... ......,.... .... ........ ...,....... "''''N "'00> ........0 O>.....Ul .....0..., 000> . . .......0 0>0>'" "'UlIO O>lI:I..... 000 "'0..... ..........10 lI:I.....1O 000 "'...... ......... lI:I.....1O . . 000 ............... ...,....... lI:I.....1O 000 ....00> IOIOUl tlltlltll lz:1s.1s. '" .... .... . . o ..., ... .... . . o ..... Ul o . . . o . . lI:I 10 o o ... o .... . . o 0> lI:I .... . . . o .... .... .... o ... ..... o o o 0> o . o '" o ... o .... o .... o o .... .... o C f-o tIl I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I Capacity Analyses Future No Build Conditions With Five Year Growth Factor I I I I I I I I I I I I I fl I I I I I Weekday I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IOENTltYING INtORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME Ot THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME Ot THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAL YS'r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD .J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE Ot THE ANALYSIS Cmm/dd/yy)...... 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ . 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INtORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH tACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -.---------______._ .n.____________________.HU.__...__._______________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------.--------------------------------------------- EB we 31 {) 525 459 0 :2 NB SB NUMBER Ot LANES --------------.-.-------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB 5B LANES 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. I . . . . . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CR I TI CAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ---.----------- -------- ----------- ------------ MINOR RIGHTS SB 6.10 5.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING I NFORMA TI ON ---~------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE' DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL.-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FL.OW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c = c - y L.OS p M SH R SH ---_._---~ --------- -------.---- ------------- ------------ MINOF: STREET SB LEFT RIGHT 1. 340 329 >- 329 > 328 > B > 662 > 641 >A 1.9 703 703 ..:. 703 :> 684 :> A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 37 702 702 702 665 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _________________.__.M.._.____._____ ____________...._____.____________._______________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI>:: ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERI3EN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... (;;,-01.-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<DAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ******'*.M-oM'***'**'***-M'-H.if'-K' **.***...***if....*** -K.**.*...i(.***************......********.* ** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -- ________._.______~..M__.__.__._____._____._.__________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE ~,e [SOUND AVE) L,J NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f(I RKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANAL.YBT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rnm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01-19'33 TIME PER 100 ANAL Y Z ED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5--6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR 13RoWTH FACTOR INTEF.:SECTIoN TYPE AND CDNTF.:oL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTIoN MAJOR BTREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOU.lMES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB W8 NB S8 LEFT 0 '" l. d THRU 525 460 0 RIGHT 0 I) 1 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB PADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE 13RADE ANGLE FOR RIt3HT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS -______ _M_________ ________._________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N SOUTHBOUND ------ VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- r.: SU TF.:UCf<S AND F.: V , S r.: COMBINATION VEHICLES r.: MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 I) WESTBOUND 5 ~:5 o NORTlIBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS -----------------------.---------------------------------------------- Ifll\llI flF' Vfll UFH fill ,11 I!TI 1 I) nT"lllT IlrnT. f'"INAI. ( lable 1 0--:2:' VALUE ADJUSTMENT CI~ I TICAL GAP .~.. .----- - ----------- -----.------ ------------ ------------- MINOR F.: I GHTS NB G. 10 f,. 10 0..00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUC'< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME lJF TUE NORTU/SOUTH STREET.... KIRfnJP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY lJTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD- 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. \ . . . . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW'-' TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ----~._-~-- ---------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 1 353 352 > 352 ~~ 351 ". B ..' > 455 > 453 >A 1 EA4 544 > 544 , 543 > A ..' MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 4 E,44 544 fA4 540 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------.---------------------------------- NAME DF THE EAST/WEST STF.:EET...... NYB TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... f(IRI<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 5-5 PM WEEI<DAY OTHER INFIJRMATIOl\I.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE F.:UNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST /~~EST STREET......... NYS TRUCtt F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOllTH STREET....... COX NECf( ROAD NAME OF TI~E ANALyST.................. EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEf<DA Y OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH f-ACTOR INTERSECTIDN TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTEF.:SECTI ON TYPE: T - I NTERSECTI ON MAJDR STREET DIRECTIDN: EAST/WEST CONTRDL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOUJt1ES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB tm NB SB LEFT ~30 0 fA THRU 496 4:35 0 RIGHT I) 1.03 2'3 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .., L .., .~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-~2 PERCENT PIGHT TUPN CUPB PADIUS (ft) ACCELEF:ATION LANE GPADE ANGLE FOR PIGHT TUPNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ___w____ ___________ ______.__________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND .------- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TPUCI(S AND PV'S Yo COMB I NA TI ON VEHICLES Yo MOTOPCVCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND ~ ..J ~ .J o NOPTHBllUND SllUTHBoUND l. 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CPITICAL GAP ._ ~._ .... - __ _._ '_0_'_ __ _ ... ___ ,.-.---.----.- ------------- ------------ MINoP PIGHTS SB 6. 10 E,. 10 0.00 5.00 MAcTDP LEFTS EB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINoP LEFTS 88 7.90 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STPEET...... NYS TRUCI( PoUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOFHH/SllUTH STPEET.... COX NECK POAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL VS IS. . . .. 6-01-1'3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDA V OTHER INFDPMATION.... FUTUPE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH FACTOP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I CAPAC I TY AND LEVEL--OF --SERV I CE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(p.:ph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------~-- -------- -------_.,- _________M___ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT 72 33 342 330 891 330 258 858 C A 891 891 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 36 632 (=,32 532 596 A I DENT I FY I NG I NFOF.:MA T I ON -------------------.-------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... COX NECK ROAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1-1 993 ; 5--6 PM WEEI(DA Y OTHER INFOPMATION.... FUTUPE - NO BUILD - 5 YF.: GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I I I I 1985 HeM: UNSI13NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------_._-----_._---~~-~----------------~-----~---------.-------------------- AVERAI3E RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE .EAST /WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANAL y!..::rr .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWARD ,J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyJ...... 5-01-'- 1 9'33 TIME PER IDD ANALyZED................ . 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION, EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: !OTOP S I 13N TRAFF I C VOLUME!:; --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 0 142 THRU 468 :3']6 0 RIGHT I) 0 17 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 .~ .< 2 I I I I I I I I I I . . . .. . . . I . ADJUSTMENT FACTOI<:S Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT PIGHT TURN CUPB PADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOP RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TI<:UCf(:S AND PV'S Yo COMB I NA TI ON VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~j 5 o WESTBOUND ~ "J ::j I) NOPTHBIJUND .1. 1 o SIJUTHBIJUND CRITICAL GAPS ---------.------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAr:;: VALUES AD.rUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Tabl f.'~ .1.0-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP R__~_ __ ___________ _ ____ --------- ----------- ------------ MINOR Rll3lnS ND c.. .1.0 5. 10 0..00 5.00 ~lA.J() 1<: LEFTS l~D 5..00 5..80 0.00 5.00 MINoP LEFTS NB 7.'30 7..90 0..00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST / WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCf( PoUTE 25 [SOUND AVE J NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... MIDDLE ROAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEf(DA Y IJTHEP INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NIJ BUILD - 5 YEAR GPOWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I . . . . . .. , , . . . . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------..--~~..-----~-.-._._._________R_____________._______..__.__________.___________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(p.:ph) e (peph) e (pepll) e (pepll) e = e - y LOS p M SH R SH -------- -----.----- ------.--- .------------ ------------- MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 160 19 416 '328 416 928 416 928 256 '309 I~ A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 696 696 696 696 A IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCf( POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F:OAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHEF: INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSII3NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *****************~.*************************************************** IDENTIFYINI3 INFORMATION -----------------.---------------------------------------------------- AVEF:Ar3E RUNNINI3 SPEED, ~1AJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...................... "9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF~EET . . . . . . . . . NYB TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERI3EN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . EDWARD ,T. SHARSKY R.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTUF:E -- NO BUILD - 5 YR I3ROWTH FACTOR I NTEF:SECT I ON TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTF:OL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP S I I3N TF:AFF I C VOUJ~1ES --------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ I I I I I EB WB NB SB LEFT ~.~ 0 :2 .::u:" THRIJ 584- ~183 0 I": I I3HT I) 8 7 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB ~'JB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. , I I I I I ADJUSTMENT F'ACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELEF.:ATION LANE GF.:ADE ANGLE F'OF.: F.:IGHT TURNS F'OF.: F.:IGHT TUF.:NS -----.--- ----------- -----~_.._--------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NOF.:THBOUND ,------ SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TF:UCKS AND F.:V'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~ ,., 5 I) WESTBOUND 5 <" d o NOF.:THBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 (1 CRITICAL GAPS -------.-------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES (Table to-2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. AD,JUSTMENT F'I NAL CF.:ITICAL GAP MINOF.: RIGHTS SB (,.10 (,.10 0.00 5.00 MA,TOR LEFTFJ EB 5.::'30 5.30 0..00 5.00 M I NOF: I_EFTS B8 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF.:EET...... NYS TF.:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... BEF.:GEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYf:lIS..... (,--01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATUF.:DAY OTHEF.: I NF'ORMA T ION. . .. FUTUF.:E -- NO BU I LD - 5 YF.: GROWTH F ACTOF.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC !TY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH --_._.__..~.. _~_______M -----.---.- -.--------.--- ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT .,: 346 336 ", 336 .~. 334 > B > 598 > 588 >A RIGHT 8 770 770 > 770 .' 752:> A MAJOR STF<:EET EB LEFT 38 757 7f>7 767 728 A !DENTI FY I NI] I NFORMA TI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 (SOUND AVE J NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY lJTHEF.: INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I . .. . . . . . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTEF.:SECTIONS Page-1 .'**if'**'**.***.*****.w'*****'*****'if'******-M'*-M'-M'.w.****'M-*.Jf'-M.i(....******************** I DENTI FY r NG I NFORMATI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . KIRKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (IlIm/dd/yy). . . . . . E,-f) 1. -1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ . 12.-1PM SATURDAY OTHER I NFOF.:MATIDN. . .. FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTF.:OL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOP STREET DIPECTION, EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE NORT~80UND: STOP SIGN TPAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB ~~B NB SB LEFT 0 1 0 THPU 586 :::92 <) PIGHT 0 I) 1 NUMBEP OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. \ . . . . . ADJUSTMENT rACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT PIGHT TURN CURB F.:ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE AN13LE rOR RIGHT TURNS rOR RIGHT TURNS ------- _~__M_______ ______M_.____._____ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 ':II) 21) N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 ':II) 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- I. SIJ TRUCf<S AND PV'S I. COMBINATION VEHICL.ES I. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ~~5 o WESTBOUND ~ ,..1 ~) I) NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. rINAL (Table 10-2) VALLIE AD.JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP '___'"'MM_ _. _._____ _ ___ -- - -- -- - - .-- ...- ------------- ------------ mNOR PIOflTS NI) 6~ 10 C.. to 0..00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS l~B ~.). 30 ~.).. 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LErTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOLlND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... I<IPI<lJP L.ANE DATE AND TIME Or THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--1':193 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION..". FlJTURE - NO BUILD -- 5 YEAF.: I3ROWTH rACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE F'age-3 .------------.--.-------...-________________.__.u..__________________.._____________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW.- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED PESERVE PATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH -----...--.- ----_._--- _____.H_____. .------------ -----.------- MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT I) 358 357 .... 357 '. 357 >- B / > 5'37 ). 596 >A 1. 5'37 5'37 > 5'37 .., 5'36 >- A ,. MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 1. 5'37 597 5'37 5'36 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUC": ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE J NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SlJUTH STF:EET.... I<IRI<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01.-1'3'33 ; 12..1PM SATURDAY lJTHEF: INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTEF:SECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAl< HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYB TRUC/< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECf'; ROAD NAME OF THE ANALyST.................. EDWARD J. SHARSI<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-01-19'33 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-1PM SATURDAY oTHEP INFORMATION.... FUTURE - NO BUILD - 5 YF: GROWTH FACTOR INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CTJNTF:oL TYPE SOUTHBOUND, STOP SIGN TPAFFIC VDLUt1ES ---------------------.------------------------------------------------ EB I.JB NB 5B LEFT 23 I) ',18 THRU ~564 37:1 0 RIGHT 0 lID 21 NUMBER OF L.ANES -----------------.---------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB BB LANES 2 .~ .<. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ---.-.. SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEH I CLE COMPOS IT ION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TRUCf<S AND PV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 e .J o WESTBOUND 5 5 I) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL (Table 1. O-N:;2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ~'N __ _~. .._ _ ._....._ __ _N __." _H' ___ -------.-.-- n_.________.____ -------------- MINOR RIGIHS SB (7; " 1.0 5. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.80 ~_). 80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.'30 7.'30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK F.:OUTE 25 (SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5--01'-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHEF.: INFORMATION.... FUTUF.:E - NO DUILD .- 5 YP GROWTH FACTOR I I I . . . . . . . I . . -. . . . . . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-Or-SERVICE Page-3 . ----------------- -----~".__._----------------- _._-_._-_._----~------------------- MOVEMENT FLOW-- RATE v(pcph) POTEN-- HAL CAPACITY c (p.:ph) p ACTUAL MOVEMENT CAPACITY c (pcph) M SHARED CAPACITY c (pcph) SH RESERVE CAPAC ITY c = c - v R SH LOS ------.- ._------- --------.- ------------ ------------ t1INOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT tIt :::':~4 340 917 83:1. :33:1. 917 '317 221 893 C A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 27 677 6T7 677 649 A IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /~IEST STPEET...... NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHEP INFOPMATION.... rUTUPE - NO BUILD -- 5 YP GROWTH FACTOR . . . . . . . . . . I . . :. . . I I . 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* I DENTI FY I NG I NFORMA TI ON .---------------------.-------- ------------- ---------------------.----------- AVERAGE F:UNN I Nfi SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST /l~EST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCf': ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE F:OAD NAME OF THE ANAL YST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 5-()1-1993 TIME PER IOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE -- NO BUILD-- 5 YEAR GROWTH ~-ACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEF:SECTION TYPE: T--INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NOR1~BOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUt1ES -----------------------..---------------.---------------------------------- EB WB NB sa LEFT 0 I) 1:25 THRU ~)55 ::152 0 P IGHT 0 0 ::;-~3 NUMBEP OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .~ ..:: .... .~ .,: I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT FUGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TUF.:NS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------.------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND .---....- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- /. BU TPUCf<::B AND RV'S /. COMBI~IATION VEHICLES /. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 r.::" ,J o WESTBOUND 5 ~ d o NOPTHBOUND 1 1 I) SOUTHBOUND CPITICAL (,APS ---------.---------------------.---------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Crabl e 10-.2 :> VALUE AD,JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ..... ..... ~~. ..... "_n.._ n...._ __ _._.._ __ .._ - ~._ .nn _ _ ....._ ----------- ------------- MINOI": PIGHTS ~m G. 10 5. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFT!3 WB ~1. 130 5.80 0..00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS NB 7. '30 7. '30 0.00 5.00 IDENTI FY I NG I NFOF.:t1ATI ON -----------------------------------.---------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/I~EST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE POAD DATE AND TIME or THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATUPDAY OTHEP INrOPMATION.... FUTUPE ... NO BUILD -. 5 YEAR GPOWTH FACTOP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-C1F-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POT EN- ACTUAL FL._OW--. TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE PATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(po:ph) c (po:ph) 0: (po:ph) 0: (po:ph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH _._ ~_ _.. ~_._ '~M .....-.---..-.-- ---------..- -.----------- ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RHlHT 142 26 ~J87 882 387 882 387 882 245 856 C A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 61'J (, 1 'J 619 619 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/14EST STREET...... NYS Tf;:UCI( ROUTE 25 (SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 1'.--01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE _. NO BUILD -. 5 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I Capacity Analyses Future Conditions With Macari and Five Year Growth Factor . . . . . I I I I . I I I .. j . I . I I Weekday I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Pag..-l **********.** ***'**'**'*iI'*****************'Jf****************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST IW;::ST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 (SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOIHH/SOUTH STREET....... BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAL YS1'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 6-~O 1-1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5 YEAF~ FUTUF.:E WITH ~1ACAF.:I I NTERSECT I ON TYPE AND CONTF.:OL ----___________R___.___.__._________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T--INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIR8:TION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TF:AFF" I C \.IOLUMEG ----------------------------------------------------------.----------- EB \~B NB SB LEFT :J 1 I) 1 THRU 534 464 I) RIGHT I) -~ 17 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 -------------------..--.------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(po:ph) c (po:ph) 0: (po:ph) 0: (po:ph) 0: = 0: - y LOS p M SH R SH -___..__0- ..-------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 334 3.~... ....:J 323 ". 322 " " .... 656 > 636 >A .... 699 > 680 > B RIGHT 1'3 6'39 59'3 A MA.TOR STREET EB LEFT ''''7 ..:IF 6'38 698 E,98 661 A IDENTIFYING INFOF:~lATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... "'YS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOr.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... BERriEN AVENUE DATE AND T r ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01-1 '393 ; 5--6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAr.:: FUTUPE WITH MACAPI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l oK- **********-M'***if'******,.,**,*************,**************************.***** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------.-.--------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE tmRTlI/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f( I RKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALyST.................. [cnWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 5-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER I NFOf;:MA TI ON. . .. 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACAR I INTEPSECTION TYPE ANn CONTROL. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTEF.:SECT I ON TYPE: T- I NTERSECTI ON MAJOP STPEET DIPECTION: EAST/WEST CONTF.:OL T'WE NoRTH80UND: r,HOP rH GN TRAFF I C VoUJtlES ------------------...-.--------------------------.------------------------ EB !--IB NB SB LEFT 0 11 6 THRlJ 525 4E,C) (I RIGHT '3 0 6 NUMBEF~ OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1. 1. 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS -----------------.--. ---..----------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- -.--------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 :20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION .----------------.--.-.-.----.-.-------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCf(S AND PV'S % COMBINATIfJN VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND I:::" ,,,I ~ ,.., o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NOPTHBOUND 1 :[ o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES AD.IUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Tablp lO..-2) VALUE AO.IUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP __ .._ ........._ .__ ,".", M_'._ __.M _ _._ -- - -- .....- -- -'-- ~._._--------- .------------- ~1I NOF: PI C;IITS NEe 6. 10 E. 10 0.00 ~ 00 .J. MAJOP '-foFTS WEe ~1. 30 ~) . 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB ~ .40 7.40 0.00 5.00 , IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE E/,ST /1~EST STPEET...... NYS TI~:UCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] ~jAME OF THE NlJf":TII/!30UTH STF:EET.... I<IPI<UF: LANE DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01-1 '3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHEF: I NFOF:MATI ON. . .. 5 YEAr;;: FlJTUF:E WITH ~lACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-Ot-SERVICE Page-3 ---------.--------..-------------------------------------------~------------ POTEN- ACTUAL tLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) .: = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ----..-.-- --------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 7 348 343 .> 343 '. 336 ~:. B > 447 .) 433 >A 7 640 640 > 640 , 633 > A MAJOR STREET we LEtT 1'7:' . ~ 63f, 636 636 6"-::-'" A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -.----------------- .---.-.-----.....-.--.-.-------------- ----------------.------------ NAME OF THE EAST / ~JEST STREET...... NYS TRUCf< POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... f<IRf<UP LANE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE f,NAL YS IS. . . .. 5-1) 1.--1 ')'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAr: FUTUPE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ****************-M'****'*************i1.**i1'*****-M.************************* I DENT I FY I NG I NFOF:MA T I ON -----------.---------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE F.:UNNING SPEED, ~lA,J()R STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STF~EET . . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF TilE ANAL YST. . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHAF:SKY P.E. , P.C. DATE ClF" THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... r:.-~o 1. -1. '393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INF[)R~lATIIJN.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACARI INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .-----------------------------------.----------------------------------- I NTERSECT I ON TYPE. I .". INTERSECT I IJN MA,JOR STREET D I F.:Fe:T I UN: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE [3IJUTIIDOUtH). [HOP [>ION TRAFF I C \!OLUI1EEi ----------------.----------------------------.--------------------------- EB WB NB S8 l.EFT 31 I) 65 THRU 49'3 442 0 RIGHT 0 103 -;;:':'3 NUMBER OF LANES -----------------.------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB S8 LANES 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F.:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE '3RADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----.- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON -~------------__~_w_____.__w______________________________________________ Yo SU TPUCf<S AND F.:V'S Yo COMB I NA TI ON VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND = ,.J L" ,..1 o WESTBOUND = ,..1 ,~ ,.J o NORTHBUUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------.-------------------------------------------------------- rM3UL.AP VALUES (Ti:\bl("~ 10.--2) ADJUSTED VAL.UE SIGHT DIST. ADJUSH1ENT FINAL CPITICAL GAP M I Nor;: F.: I Gf Irs E;El C. 1.0 c.. 10 0.00 5.00 tlAJOP LEFTS EEl ~5. 80 5.fJO o~oo 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SEl 7.90 7.90 0.00 5..00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------.-----------------------------------------.----------- NAME OF THE EAST I~~EST [.,TREET...... NYS TF.:UCK F.:OUTE NAME OF THE NOPTII/SOUTH STPEET.... COX NECK POAD DATE AND TIME UF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 5-5 OTHEP INFOPMATIDN.... 5 YEAr;: r-lJTUF.:E WITH MACAPI 25 [SOUND AVE] PM WEEKDAY I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------~----_._-----_._----_._._._--_._-------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pqlh) c (po::ph) ': (po::ph) ': (po::ph) 0:: = 0:: - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -.------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT 73 33 337 887 325 087 325 887 251 855 C A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 37 626 E)2C 626 589 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------.------------------------.---------------------------------- NAME OF TIlE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK r.::OUTE NAME OF THE NlJPTH/SlJUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME llF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--19'33 ; 5-6 OTHER I NFOr.::MA TI DN. . .. 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACAR I 25 [SOUND AVEJ PM WEEI<DA Y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l **********if'*****'**-l4-...**.*************************. ********************** I DENTI FY I NG I NFORMA TI ON ----------------------------------------------------------.----------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... . 9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . ~lIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANAL YST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... t;-O 1-1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER I NFORMA TI ON. . .. 5 YEAR FUTURE ~J ITH MACAF.: I INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTIDN MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE NOPTHDOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB [.JB NB SB LEFT 0 0 144 THRU 468 ::1'3El <) RIGHT 0 I) 17 NUMBER OF LANES _____w____._.____.___.__.____________________~_______________________________ ED WB NB BB LANES .~ <. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 -----------------------------------~---------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RAD IUS <: f t ) ACCELERA TI ON LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS -------~ ~---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHDOLJND-,---- VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON ------------------------_...________________ __M____________________________ I. SU TRUCKS AND RV'S I. COMB I NA TI ON VEHICLES I. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 e .J I) NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS -----.-----.-----------...----.----------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED f3IGHT DIST. FINAL Crable 10-:':: :> VALUE AD.JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ......-.--.------ ..---."------ .----.------- ------------ tlINOR RIGHTS ND c. 10 5.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WE) ~5. 80 ~). 80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTf3 NO '7 .'30 7.90 0.00 5.00 , I DENT IFYING INFOF:MAT ION ---.--------------.----------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF:EET...... NYS TF~UCI( F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF TilE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F:OAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFOF:MATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------..~-----_.~._----------------_._---------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) 0: (pcph) .: (pcph) 0: (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 1.62 1'3 416 '328 416 '328 416 928 254 909 C A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 696 696 696 696 A IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION -------------------.----------------------------------------~~.._--------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYSTPUCK ROUTE NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH t1ACARI 25 [SOUND AVE] PM WEEf<DA Y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l *******************~.************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAL YE:;T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAF.:D J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 5-01-1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACAF.:I INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------.------..------------------------------- I NTERSECTt ON TYPE: T -- I NTERSECTI ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND, !3TOP SIGN TRAFFIC VClLUMES ---------------.------------------------------------------------------- EB HB NB SB LEFT ~.-. I) .~ "'-<- ..:: THRU ~)93 3m3 0 F.:IGHT 0 8 -, NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I ADJUSTMENT F"ACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-Z PERCENT PIGHT TURN GRADE ANI3LE CURB RADIUS (ft) FOR RIGHT TURNS ACCELERATION LANE FOR R II3HT TURNS -------- ----------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ------ SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEH I CLE CO~lPOS I TI ON -------.--.-------.--.--.--.---------------.----.---------.-------------------------- I. SU TPIJCKS AND PV'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MOTOF.:CYCLES EASTBOUND ., "J e 0..1 o WESTBOUND e ,J 5 o NOPTHBOllND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CFU TICAL GAPS -------_._------_._----~--------------------_._------------------------------ rABUL.AP VALUES ADJUSTED SH;HT DIST. FI NAL Crable 10-2) VALLIE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL 13AP .--.--..--.------ _._---- .-.---.-.....-...-..- ------.----- .------------ MINOR RIGHTS S8 (;1. 10 G. 10 0.00 5.00 MA,JOP LEFTS EEl 5.30 ~5. 30 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS BB 7.40 "7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------------.--------------------------------- NAME OF HIE EArn IWEST STF.:EET...... NYS TF.:LJCK F.:OllTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NDPHl/SlJUTH STF.:EET.... BEPGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-19'33 ; lZ-IPM SATURDAY lJTHEP I NFlJF.:~1A TI ON. . .. 5 YEAP FUTlIPE WITH MACAR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ----------.----------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEt1ENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ----.--- -------- --------- ------------ ----.-------- MINOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT .~ 340 330 > 330 '. 327 > B '" .- " 592 '. 581 >A ..' " 8 766 766 > 766 '. . 758 > A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT :38 762 762 762 724 A IDENTIFYING INFORI'1ATION -----------------------------------------.-.------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 12-1F'M SATURDAY OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH t1ACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *********-M'****oJf'**'**************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... . 9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE- EAST/WEST STREET.. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. NYS TRUC~~ F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF TIlE NIJF.:TH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f< I Rf<UP LANE NAME OF THE ANAl~ \{ST .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWAF:D J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-1) 1-1 '~'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER I NFORMA TI ON. . .. 5 YEAR FUTUF.:E WITH MACAR I INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR ~>TREET D I PECT I ON: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP !3 I GN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -----------------.-----------------------.--.--------------------------- ED ~JB ND SD LEFT I) (, 5 THRU 586 ='~'::r2 I) RIGHT '3 I) 8 NUMBEF.: OF LANES ________._.n.____.__._.~_ ._.___.____.______________________________________________ ED WB NB SB LANES t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACT"ORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------~----------------------~---------------------.----------- f. SU TRUCf<S AND PV'S f. COMBINATION VEHICLES f. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ".. .., o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1. o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL CiAPS ----------~-.------------------------------------___________M___________ TABl.JLf,P VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL Crable 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP .,..._ _~._.__~._ __ ___M'M_M.. __.._._.__.M___ n_.__________ ..------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB E., 10 F,. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5.30 5..30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB .1.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET".... NYS TRUCf< F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET..., KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1.PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF:MATION.... 5 YEAI': FUTURE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF-SERVICE Page-3 -------------------------~--------------_._---------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(p.:ph) 0: (pcph) 0: (pcph) ': (pcph) 0: = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT G 353 351 > 351 >- 345 " B / >- 459 > 454 >A ') 5'34 594 '> 594 ", 585 A ,," MAJOR STREET WB LEFT "7 5'30 5'30 5'30 583 A I DENT I FY I NG I Nrcmt1A T ION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOFHH/SlJUTH STREET.... I<IRJ<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... f,-Ol-l'3'~13 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY lJTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTUF.:E IHHI MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ***********iI-******.Jf.*******************-JI.****************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD .T. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . G-I) 1-1 '393 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACARI I NTERSECTI ON TYPE AND CONTROL --------------~-------_._-_._-------------_._---_._------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC I.IClLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB lAB NB SB LEFT 24 0 9'3 THF.:IJ 570 :375 I) RIGHT () 1.18 21. NUMBEP OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .... .., .c .~ .<. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE tOR RIGHT TURNS tOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- .----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ------ SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEH I CLE COMPOS I TI ON ~--------_._------_._._--_._-------_._------------------------------------- Yo SU TRUCYS AND F:V'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 = ,.J I) WESTBOUND ,~ ,.J 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 I) CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES ADJ.USTED SIGHT lHST. tINAL (T"ble 1 (>--2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP . ,- ..- ....... .-. - -.- -- --. -- - -- --....--.-.....-. ..--.----.------ _._---------- MINOR RIGHTG SB 6. 10 f:.. 10 0.00 5. 00 MAJOR LEtE; EEl r.c~ 80 5.80 0.00 5.00 ".J. MINOR L.EFTG SB 7.90 7. '30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------.--.-.---------------------.-------------------------------- NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI< F.:oUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME or THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECI< ROAD DATE AND TIME or THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--19'33 ; 12-1PM SATUF.:DAY OTHER INFOPMATJON.... 5 YEAF.: FUTURE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-Or-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL rLOW- HAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) -: (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LErT RIGHT 112 24 335 326 326 915 214 891 C A '315 915 MAJOR r:;TREET EB LEFT 2':) (:,73 f373 673 644 A IDENTIrYING INrORMATION -----------------.-.---.------------------.------------------------------- NAME Or THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME Or THE NOF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ,\NALYSIS..... 6-01---1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l *******.******...*************...********....-)1..,-*.***************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------.--------------------------------------------------- AVERA'3E J;;:UNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NYS TRUCf( POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOLJTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE POAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD J. SHARSf(Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rnm/dd/yy). . . . . . f,-I) 1. --1 '393 TIME PEP IDD ANALyZED................ . l2-1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTUF.:E WITH MACAPI INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CONTPOL --------------------------------------------------.------------------- I NTEPSECTI ON TYPE: T -- I NTEPSECT ION MAJOP STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE NOF.:TIIBDUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUt1ES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NEt 58 LEFT I) I) 127 THPIJ 555 :362 I) RI13HT I) I) 23 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .-, "" 2 .~ "" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIt3HT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----.. VEH I CLE COMPOS IT ION --------------------~--_._-----------_._--~------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND f'N' S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND 5 ~ _J o WESTBOUND 5 ~ _J o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TADUL.AF: VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIBT. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE AD.JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP u___. __.______.__n_____.__ "---.---..-.- -.---------- -.-----------.- MINOR F:IGHTS NB C. 10 ..- 10 0.00 5.00 ,.'. MAJOR LEFTS WB =i.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS NB 7.90 7.'30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATIoN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STF:EET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1'3'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAR FUTURE WITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--OF'-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------.--------------.-----.------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW'-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -----.--- --------.- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEF'T RIGHT 143 26 387 882 387 882 387 882 244 856 C A MAJOR STREET WB LEF'T l) (,19 619 G.19 619 A I DENTIF'Y ING I NF'OF.:Mi\TI ON ----------------------------------------------.-------------------------- NAME OF' THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF' THE NORTH/SOUTH STREEl'.... MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIt1E Dr THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5 YEAF.: FUTURE I~ITH MACARI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capacity Analyses Future Conditions with All Projects and Five Year Growth Factor I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . , I I I I I Weekday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTItYING INtORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.; 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME Ot THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME Ot THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAL YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE Ot THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INtORMATION.... nVE YEAR tUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTF.:OL ----------.------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAttIC VOLUMES ----_______w_____.__._....~..n_..~_..________________.__.__._.______.________________________ EB WB NB SB LEtT 31 I) 1 THRU 557 477 0 RIGHT I) " 17 NUMBER Ot LANES ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR R H31-IT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------.------------------------------------------------------ x SU TRUCI(S AND RV'S X COMBINATION VEHICLES X MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS ----------------------------------~_._--------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (TAble 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP .-----.------------ -------.-- ------------ ------------ MINOR PIGHTS 5B 5.10 5.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------.-----.-----.-------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BEF.:GEN AVENUE DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-01-1 '3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEI(DA Y oTHEF.: INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 317 306 > 306 > 305,' B > 643 > 622 >A RIGHT 1.9 687 687 " ,. 687 668,' A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 37 686 686 686 549 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------~--------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERr;iEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FlJTUF:E WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ****************~.**************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAI3E RUNN I NG SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f(I RKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANAl_ YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., p.e. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . 6-01-19'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -----------------------________________8______________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTF.:OL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFF I C VOLUME!:, ---------------_._---_._"---_._-------------_.~--_._---------------------------- E8 W8 0 11 541 477 '3 I) N8 S8 NUMBER m- LANES ---------------.--.--- -- --------------------------------------------------- E8 W8 N8 S8 LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I ADJUSTMENT tACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F.:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE tOR RIGHT TURNS tOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION -.-------------------------------------------------------------------- 'l. SU TRUCKS AND RV'S 'l. COMBINATION VEHICLES 'l. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. tINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -------------- -------- ~----------- ._~----------- MINOR RIGHTS NB 6.10 (0.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB ::).30 ~). 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB .7.40 7. ,~O 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION ------.-~---.--____.____M___________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... r<IRfC:UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'393 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS < I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 .-----------------.---------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(po:ph) c (po:ph) c (pcph) c (pcph) 0: = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ 11 I NOR STREET NB LEFT 7 332 328 > 328 >- 321 > B RIGHT > 430 > 417 >A 7 626 626 626 > 619 > A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 13 623 623 623 610 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----~---------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK ~lOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-01-1993 TIME PER IDD ANALyZED................. 5.-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER I NFOPMATI ON. . .. FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I NTERSECTI ON TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECTI ON TYPE: T -- I NTERSECT ION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------.-------------------------------------------------- LEFT EB WB NB S8 34 I) 58 509 458 0 0 103 2':3 THRU RIGHT NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E8 WB NB SB LANES 2 .., 4 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TRUCKS AND PV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES ----.--------- EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND ~ '-' 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 I) CRITICAL GAPS ---------.------------------------------ ------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (T ab 1 e 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -..--------------- -------- ------------ .------------ MINOR RIGHTS SB E.l0 C.I0 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.'JO 7.90 0.00 5.00 I DENTI FY I N'3 I NFOF.:MATI ON ---------------------.--------------------------------------------------- NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF::TH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECf< ROAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01-1 '393 ; 5-6 PM WEEf<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... rIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I CAPAC ITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) 0: (pcph) .: (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB- LEFT 77 323 310 310 233 C RIGHT 33 879 879 879 846 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 41 615 615 615 574 A IDENTI FY I NG' I NFOF.:MATI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1-1 993 ; 5-6 PM WEEI(DA Y OTHEF.: INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAI': FUTURE WITH AL.L PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HeM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ************************************~.******************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCf< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE F:OAD NAME or THE ANAL YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSI(Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). .. . . . 6-01-1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ . 5-6 PM WEEIWA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... rIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS INTERSECTllJN TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------.-------------------- I NTERSECTI ON TYPE: T - I NTERSECT I ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VlJLU~1ES -----.-----------..----.---------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 I) 14'3 THRU 475 407 0 RH,HT 0 0 17 NUMBER OF LANES -----------------..-----...------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB S8 LANES .., .~ 2 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ADJUSTMENT tACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE tOR RIGHT TURNS tOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION -~--------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCf(S AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND '" .J 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL nAPS -----------------------------------------------------------.----------- TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. tINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP --.--.-------------- ------..-- ------------ ------------- MINOR PIGHTS NB fi.10 ~) ~ 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEtTS WB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEtTS NB 7.90 7.90 0.00 5.00 I DENT I tY I NG I NtOF:MA T I ON ----------.-------------------------------------------------------------- NAME Ot THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME Ot THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... MIDDLE ROAD DA TE AND TI ME Ot THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. f---O t -19'33 ; 5-f- PM WEEKDA Y OTHER I NtORMA TI ON. . .. tI VE YEAR tUTLJRE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -------------.-------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 168 19 406 924 406 924 406 924 237 905 C A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 690 690 690 690 A I DENTI FY I NG I NFOF.:MA TI ON ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F.:OAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01--19'33 1 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER INFOF.:MATIDN.... FIVE YEAR FUTl.lRE WITH ALL PF.:OJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE .EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALyST.................. EDWARD ,1. SHARSI(Y P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-01-1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS INTEF.:SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTEF:SECT I ON TYPE: T -- I NTEF.:SECTI ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: (HOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --____._~_._______w_._~___.___~_______________._.___.________________.____.____________ EB WB NB 5B LEFT ~.~ I) :2 .,::,~;;. THRU 511:; 400 0 F.:IGHT 0 8 .~ I NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IT I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN GRADE ANGLE CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----.- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ----------.------------__4___.___________M____________------------------- I. SU TRUCKS AND RV'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND e .J 5 o WESTBOUND e .-I ,- ..) o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1. 1 o CRITICAL OAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL 'Table 10-:;0 VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -.------------.-- --.-.----.- ------------ " .----------- MINOR RIGHTS SO 6.10 G.I0 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS EB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYIM3 INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF:UCI< F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'393 ; 12--1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW'- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH -------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT .~ "' 323 313 " .' 313 > 311 " , >- 565 >A > 747 '. " B > 575 RIGHT 8 755 755 > 755 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT :38 751 751 751 713 A IDENTIFYING INFOPMATIIJN -------------.--.-- ----------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... . 9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOFnH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f(I RKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01-1993 TIME PER IOD ANALyZED.... ...... ....... 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I NTERSECTI ON TYPE AND CONTF.:OL ----------------------------------~------~-- .--------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T.-INTEF.:SECTION . MAJOR fjTREET DIRECTION: EAST IWEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP !3IGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------_._--_._._-_._-----------------~-_._-----------------~----------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 6 5 THRU E,06 404 o PIGHT '3 I) 8 NUMBER OF LANES ----------~------_._----------------_._--------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I ADJUSTMENT .ACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE .OR RIGHT TURNS .OR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- .----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N SOUTHBOUND----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- '%. SlI TRUCKS AND RV'S '%. COMBINATION VEHICLES '%. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND r. d 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS __________w____.~.____ ___________________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. nNAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -~-------------- ----..---.--- ----------- ------------ MINOR PI mlTS NB E,.10 6.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFnJ we ~:;. :30 5..30 0..00 5.00 M I NoF: LE.TS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYINI" INFOPMATIoN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TF:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME O. THE NlJRTH/SlJUTH STREET.... f<IRI<UP LANE DATE AND TIME O. THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- F'OTEN- ACTUAL FL.OW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAF'AC ITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcphl c (pcphl c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 338 336 > 336 > 330 > B RIGHT > 453 > 438 >A '3 579 579 > 579 > 570 > A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 7 576 576 576 569 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCf( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1'393 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAR FUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l **************************************.****************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------.-------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOFi:TH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK Fi:OAD NAME OF THE ANAI._ YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . COWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . (;-01-1'333 TIME PER roo ANAL Y Z ED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOFi:MATION.... FIVE YEAFi: FUTUFi:E WITH ALL PROJECTS. INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -----------------------------------------~-----------~------------------ I NTERSECTI ON TYPE: T- I NTERSECTI ON MAJOFi: STFi:EET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTFi:OL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB we NB BB LEFT 27 0 100 THFi:U 585 ~7}87 I) RIGHT 0 118 21 NUMBEFi: OF LANES ----------_._-------~------------------_._------------------------------ EB WB NB S8 LANES 2 .~ <. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ADJUSTMENT rACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE rOR RIGHT TURNS rOR RIGHT TURNS _______ H__________ ________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ----------------.----------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND F.:V'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ,~ oJ ~ d I) WESTBOUND 5 ,- .) I) NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS __________M__________ _M___._______________________________________________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (TablE.' 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP . .._--~--------- ._--_.- ,,--.------ ----------- -------------- MINOR RIGHTS BE 6. 1.0 h. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS ED :=:"i.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.'30 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------.------------.---.-------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI( F=:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECI< POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1'393 ; 12-1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FIVE YEAF=: FUTUPE WITH ALL PROJECTS. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL --OF -SERV I CE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ----.--.- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET S9 LEFT 113 320 311 311 19B D RIGHT 24 '30B 90B 90B BBS A MAJOR STREET E9 LEFT "::t.-. 662 662 662 630 A ,:J4 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------.-------------------.---.--------------------.----------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... (;-01--1'393 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... rIVE YEAR FUTUPE WITH ALL PF.:OJECTS. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *************.********************** ..********.*******.****************** IDENTItYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR tACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME Ot THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUC~~ F.:OUTE 25 (SOUND AVEJ NAME Ot THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE Ot THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INtORMATION.... FIVE YEAR tUTURE WITH ALL PROJECTS INTERSECTION TYPE I\ND CONTF.:OL ------------_._---_._----------------~-_._------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTF.:OL TYPE NURTHBOUND: !,nOp S 1I:3N TRAFFIC VOLUMES -_._--_._._._----_._._-_._._.._---------------_._--~_.---------.--------------------- EB l~B NB SB LEFT 0 0 130 THRU 567 :370 0 RIGHT I) 0 :23 NUMBER OF LANES --------.----------.---.---.------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB LANES 4 .~ "'- 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---.------------.- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND -----, VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------.--------------------.---------------------------- Yo SU TRUCf':S AND PV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTOPCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ~7j o WESTBOUND ~ ,J ~ .J o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS ---------------.---------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL (Tabl.. 10-:2) VALUE AD,JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ...~ -- -~- - - ---- - --- -- -- ---...-.--.-- ----------- ------------ MINOP F.: I GHTS NB 6. II) 5.. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOP LEFTS lIB 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS NB '7. '31) 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INrOPMATrON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE POAD DATE AND TH1E or THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOPt1ATION.... FIVE YEAP FUTURE WITH ALL PPOJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I I I I I CAPAC ITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOlJ-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcpll) c (pcpll) -: (pcpll) .: (pcpll) c = c - y LOS p M SH R. SH ----.--- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT 147 378 378 378 231 C RIGHT 26 876 876 876 850 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT I) 611 611 611 611 A I DENTI FY I NG I NFOF.:~lA TI ON ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F:OAD DATE AND TIME OF HIE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12--1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF:MATJON.... FIVE YEAP FUTUPE WITH ALL PPOJECTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capauity Analyses Existing Conditions "j teh ""g"st/June IIdjustn\f~nt: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Weekday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'385 HCM: UNS I GNAL rzED I NTERSECTI ONS Page-l ***************~*~*****************.~********************************* IDENTIFYING INFORI'lATION ----------------.-------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE PUNN I NG SF'EED, tlA,JOR STREET.. 45 PEAtO:: HOUR FACTOR..................... . ,) AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME DE THE EAST/hIEST !3TREET......... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 rSOUND AVE] NAt1E OF THE tJORTIJ/SOUTH STREET....... DF-RGEN AVENUE NAME OF TilE 1\t.IAL,Y~n"."".."."......... EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dtllyy)...... 6-01"-('393 rIME PERIOD ANAL_YZED................. 5-GPM l~EEKDA Y IHHFR INFUPMATIUN.... EC<I!')TINi::, CONDITlOt-ln lHTH AUG/,JUN AD,JUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------.--------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE:r-INTERSECTION tlAJDP UIREET DIF;:EC:TION: r:AST/l~EST CONn:::OL TYPE !,mUTIIF::IJlJND: STDP !3 t GN I'RArT I r:' '/DL,Llt'lr:!', -.---------.-..----------..--.-.-----.-.-..- EEl L-,Il') tiP. sn LEFT ::.11. o TlIf"'LJ ,,::-.'~,.-, .. .::. ~:~ .:1. ~:-.'i"7 (I PIGII1' o 1.7 NUMBEP UF' L.M,IF'E: _.. ""M ~-_.. __ ,....,__. ___'_'" ,.. ... '.., M~. ....n'_'M .. ..... n." _.. ......_ .... ___..__.__.__~__.__._. .d... ___~__..H___.____.____.__._..____ _._ "_'____'_'.'H __ _ _.__ r::D t~B ND SB LANES I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT tACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------.----- -------------------~----------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND PV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTOPCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND e ,~ 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1. 1 o CRITICAL GAPS .-----------------.-.---------.-.------------------------------------------- TABULAr-< VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. tINAL Crable 10'-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CF.: IT I CAL GAP .----...----------- --------- ----------- ------------ MINOF.: F.: I GHTS SEI 6. 10 E. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOF.: LEtTS EB ~.5. :~O ~j. 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEtTS 5B 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 I DENT I FY I NG I NFOF.:MA T I ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME DF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME Ot THE NDRTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-01-19'33 ; 5-6PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOF.: STREET S8 L.EFT 1 343 332 )- 332 ". 331 > B > 664 , 643 >A .-- 705 ", 705 686 A ..' ..' ..' RIGHT 19 705 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 37 704 704 704 667 A IDENTIFYING INFOF.:MATION ~--------------------_.__._--------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 rSOUND AVEJ NAME DF THE NORTfI/SOUTH STREET.... BERf:iEN AVENUE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-01"-1 '3''33 ; 5-6PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... EXISTING CONDITIIJNS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME Or- THE EAST/WEST STPEET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME or- THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . 1<1 RKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD ,]. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (lllm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01-1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6PM l~EEKDA Y OTHER INFORt1ATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEF.:SECTION TYPE: T--INTERSECTION MAJOR !3TREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 0 " 1 .:.) THRU 522 458 I) RIGHT 0 0 1 NUMBEF.: (IF" LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 :20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I. SU TI':UCf<S AND FN' S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MOTOi':CYCLES EASTBOUND 5 r::~ " o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GI\RS ------------------- --~---_._----_._--~----------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (T<lble to-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL 13AR .-.--------------- --------- ,.----------- ------------ t'iI NOR RIGHTS ND b. 10 6. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WE< ~j.. 30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORtlATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST !3TREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME or THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... l<Im::up LANE DATE AND TIME DF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-19'33 ; 5-6PM l~EEKDAY lJTHEF: I I\1Fl1F:tlAT I ON. . .. EX I STI NO COND IT IONS WITH AUr3/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page.-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL F"LOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEF"T 1 356 355 " 355 ...- 353 > B > 458 > 456 >A ~:. 647 " 645 > A ..' RIGHT 1 647 647 MAJOR STREET we LEFT 4 647 647 647 643 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------~------_._---------------------------.------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST [HREET...... NYS TRUCI': ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE "'DRTH/SOUTH STREET.... I<IF.:KUP LANE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE ANAL VS IS. . . .. 6-01-1 '393 ; 5-6PM WEEKDA Y OTHER I NF"ORMATI ON. ... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1385 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************.************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------.--------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST GTREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK F.:OAD NAME OF THE ANAL YST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. GHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 5-01-19'33 TIME PER IOD ANALyZED................ . 5-5PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AIJ13/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CDNTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECT I ON TYPE: T-- I NTERSECT ION MAJOR !:iTREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TF.:AFFIC VOLUMES --- -----------.------.-------.--------.-.-------------------------------------- EB we NB SB LEFT 30 I) 54 THRIJ 4'33 432 0 RIGHT l) 103 2'3 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES ..::. 2 .~ "- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE tOR RIGHT TURNS tOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBoUND----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------.---------------------------- % SU TRUCf<S AND PV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOToPCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ~ ," o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABUL.AP VALUES ADJUSTED S I13HT DIST. rINAL CTable 1.0-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CF:ITICAL GAP .~---~-------------- ------.-.- .----------- ------------- MINoP F:IGHTS SB 6.10 6.10 0.00 5.00 ~lAJOP LEFTS ED :5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINDP L.EFTS SB 7.90 '7.90 0.00 5.00 I DENT I FY I NI3 I NFOF:MA T I ON ----------------.---.----------___________.__._h________ _____________________ NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... ~JYS TPUCI< PoUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTll/snUTH STPEET.... COX NECK PoAD D/\ TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-01-19'33 ; 5-5PM WEEKDA Y OTHEP I NFoF.:MA TI ON. . .. EX I STI NI3 COND IT IONS WITH AlIGI JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --_______________w____________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH -------- MM._______ -------.-- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT 72 '"=''':\ ~~ 345 8'33 333 8':33 333 8':33 261 860 C A MAJOR BTREET ED L.EFT 36 635 635 635 59':3 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------.------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EABT /~JEST GTREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME (JF THE NORTH/SOUTH GTF~EET.... COX NECK F.:OAD DA TE AND T I ME OF THE (.\NAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1-1 '393 ; 5-6PM WEEKDA Y OTHER INFOPMATION.... EX ISTING CONDITIONB WITH AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *********""*****-M'*iI'*************************************************** I DENTI FY I NG I NFOF:~lA TI ON -~-------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCf( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE) NAME OF TIlE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE POAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD ,J. SHAPSf';:Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . E.-I) 1-1 '3'33 TIME PEPlnD ANALyZED................. 5-6PM WEEKDAY OTHEP INFORMATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CDNTPOL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTEPSECTION MAJOR EiTREET DIF:ECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTI~BOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WE< NB BB LEFT I) I) 141 THF:U 465 3'34. 0 F:It3HT 0 0 17 NUMBEP lJF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .-, .<. ,~ .<. :2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS ACCELERATION LANE FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------~---------------------------------_._----------------------------- Yo SLI TRUCKS AND RV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND = w 5 o WESTBOUND 5 = "' I) NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED '3 II3HT DIST. FI NAL (Table 11).-2 ) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP .----------------- .---.------- ------------ ------------ MINOr.:: PIGIHS NB G~ 10 5.10 0.00 5.00 t1A,JlJR LEFT!] WB ~.:). 80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. ')0 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYINI3 INFORMATIl1N -----.--------------.---- ..--.-------------------.------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME or THE NORTH/SOUTH STF:EET.... MIDDLE POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFlJF:MATION.... EXISTING CDNDITIONS WITH AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------.------------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLmJ-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVE~lENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 159 19 419 '330 419 930 419 930 260 910 C A MAJOR STF.:EET ~JB LEFT o /:,99 /:'9'3 699 699 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCf< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... /:,-01-1993 ; 5-6PM WEEKDAY OTHER I NFORMATIOl\!. '" EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AIJG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HeM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-I ********'**********-M'********************",,******************.*********** I DENT I FY I NG I NFOf;:NA T I ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSI(Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5-01 -1 '393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 1.2-l.PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... EXISTIN'3 CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEF:SECTI ON TYPE AND CONTRDL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECn ON TYPE: T-- I NTERSECTI ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: !'3TOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 32 I) .~ ~::. THRI.J 580 ::'180 0 RIGHT 0 8 '7 NUMBER OF LANES - --------------.--- .--.-------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT .ACTORS Page-2 ---------------------~------------------------------------------------- PERCENT F.:IGHT TURN CURB PADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- -~--------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION .~~------------- ---~.__._.__.._---- .--.---------------.-------------------------------- Yo SU TF.:UCI<S AND F.:V'S :~ COMB I NA TI ON VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND ~ ,J 5 I) NOF.:THBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 I) CRITICAL CiAPS ----.--.------- -----.--------------------------------------------------- fABULAR VALUES AD.JUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL Cfable 1.0-2) VAL.UE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL. GAP ------------------- --------...-.-. .----------- ------------ M I NOF: F: I Gins GB c. 10 c. 10 0.00 5.00 r1A,JOF: LEFTS EB 5.:10 ~5. 30 0.00 5.00 M I NClF.: LEFTS FiB "7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME m- THE EAST/WEST !3TREET...... NYS T[;:UCK F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SDUTH !3TREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME IW TilE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1'3'3:3 ; 12.-I.PM SATURDAY OTHER INFDF.:MATIot~.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL.-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLm~- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY ~10VEMENT vC:pcph) c C:pcph) c C:pcph) .: C:pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ----.---- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOF.: STREET 5B LEFT RIGHT 2 350 339 > 339 ,,:' 337 > B > 602 > 592 >A !3 773 773 >- 773 765 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT :38 7f.9 7[,9 769 731 A I DENT I FY I NG I NFOF.:MA TI ON -------------------.-------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12.-1PM SATURDAY OTHEF.: INFOPMATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AlJG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNS I GNAL IZED I NTERSECT IONS Page-l ********************...***,*************** ****if'************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME or THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . KIRKUP LANE NAME OF THE ANAL YDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE or THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 5--01-1993 TIME PER IOn ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER I NFORMA TI ON. . .. EX I STI N03 COND IT IONS WITH AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEF.:SECTI ON TYPE AND CONTPOL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEPSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOP STPEET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE NOr.::THBOI..lND: STOP SIGN TRf\rT I C VOLU~lES ---------------.------------------------------------------------------- EB ~JB NB SB LEFT 0 1. I) THRU 582 38'3 0 RIGHT I) I) 1 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------.-----.-------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- -.--------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NOF~THBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND...---- VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCI<S AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND = ,., 5 o WESTBOUND = -, 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL I::IAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR \/,\LUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALLIE AD,JUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ---,-----_..- --.- ------ --------- ....------------ ------------ MINOR F.:IGHTS NB f). 10 C. 1.0 0.00 5.00 t1AJOR LEFTS WB 5. :::}C) ~-i.. 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB "1.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------------.---------------------------- NAME OF TIlE Ef,ST IWEST STREET...... NYS TPUO< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NlJF.:TH/SlJUTH STREET.... I<IR~~UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1.993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF.:MATIIJI\I.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AU13/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------~------------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOl~- TlAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) (: (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- ~_R_______ -.-------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT o RIGHT 1 361 361 .... 361 " 361 > B .... 600 :> 599 >A 600 600 ..;. 600 .... 599 > A MAJOF.: STREET we LEFT 1 600 600 600 598 A IDENTIFYING INFOPMATlON --------------------.-----.------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCf': POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NlJRTH/SOUTH STPEET.... KIF.:I<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 12-1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... EXISTINr:3 CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME lJF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE ANAL Y!3T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAF.:D J. SHAF.:SKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyi...... 6-1) 1--1 9'33 TIME PER IOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH ALlI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND ClJNTROL --------~-----------------------------_._-_._-------------------.---------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MA,JOR iHF:EET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUfHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT .-;.,,:, 0 '37 .~-,..I THF.:LJ 560 ;Jt,8 0 PIGHT 0 117 21 NUMBEP OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E8 W8 N8 S8 LANES 2 ,-, ." 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR F.:IGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- -~--------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND .----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEH I CLE COt1POS I T I ON --------______~______W_"_....._..__..__ ____._____________________________________ I. Sl.J TRUCKS AND RV'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~ d 5 I) WESTBOUND ~ ,J 5 o NOF.:THBlJUND SOUTHBOUND 1 t o CRITICAL OAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAI': VALUES AD.Jl.JSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL Crable 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -.--------------- .-.----.--.- -------.----- ------------- MINOR FIGHTS 5B E.. 10 F, ~ 1.0 0.00 5.00 MA.JlJF.: LEFTS EB ~3. 00 ~.5. 80 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS GEl 7.90 "7..90 0.00 5.00 r DENT I FY I NG I NrOF.:MA T I ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYSTF.:UCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME Dr THE NDF:TH/SlJUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME or T~E ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 1.2-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF.:MATION..." EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AU13/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------.--------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ______R_ -..------- -------.--- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET sa LEFT RIGHT 109 24 343 335 '319 335 919 226 895 ,-, A '319 MAJOR STREET EEl LEFT ",7 (,80 680 680 653 A IDENTI FY I NG I NFOPtlAT WN ------------------..------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STPEET...... NYS TF.:UCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME DF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-19'33 ; 12'-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFor:::t'lATIUN.... EXISTING CUNIHTIONS WITH AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI ZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************~.************************************************ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE .EAST I\~EST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TPUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTHlSOUTH STPEET. . . . . . . M !DDLE POAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD ,J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01.--1 '3'33 TIME PEF.: IOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY llTHEP INFOF.:MATION.... EXISTI"tG CONDITIONS WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEF:SECT I ON TYPE AND C:ONTPOL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTEPSECTI ON TYPE: T.- INTEPSECTI ON t1A,JDR ElTREET DIPECTION: EAST IWEST CONTPOL TYPE NOPTIIBOUND: STOP SIGN TPAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 LEFT 0 0 126 THRU 551 359 0 PI'3HT I) I) .-........ "::'..:J NUMBEP or LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- E8 WB "IB S8 LANES 2 .-, "' 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ----------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 'l. SU TRUCKS AND RV'S 'l. COMBINATION VEHICLES 'l. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~ ,J ~ ...1 o WESTBOUND ~ ,J 5 I) NORTHBOUND t l. o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- fASULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE AD,TUSTMENT CRITTCAL GAP ---- -- -----.---...-.----- -----.---.-"- -.----------- *------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB c. 10 ~ to 0.00 5.00 '_.I. MA,JOP LEFTS WB ~).. Be) 5..80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB ].90 7.'30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF TilE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SOLlTH STREET.... 11IDDLE POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; t2--1F'M SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... EXISTING CONDITIONS l.JITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Pa.ge-3 ----------------_._._---------------------------~----------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW'- TIAL MoVEt1ENT SHARED RESERVE F:ATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(po::ph) 0:: (pcph) 0:: (p.:ph) 0:: (pcph) c '" c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- M_._.__R____ --------- ------------ ------------ MINOF: STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 142 26 390 884 390 884 390 884 248 858 C A MAJOR STF:EET WB L.EFT l) 6:22 622 622 6~.., "'::'.0::. A I DENTI FY I NI3 I NFoF:MA TI ON ---------------------~------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF:UCf' F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... tHDDLE F:oAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-19'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOF:MATlON.... EX ISTlNr3 CONDITIONS WITH AUI3/3UN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capacity Analyses Future No Build Conditions With Five Year Growth Factor and August/June Adjustment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Weekday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'385 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ***************************.~***************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------.---.------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BER'3EN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAI._ YST .. .. .. . . .. . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... F,-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEE~:DAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTEF:SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -~-------------------------------------_._----~-----_.----------.----------- I NTEF$ECTI ON TYPE: T -- I NTERSECT I ON MA.TOR STREET D IRECTIDN: EAST/WEST CIJNTF:OL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP [3IGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB t~B NB 5B LEFT 34 0 1 THRU :57'3 50E, 0 RII3HT 0 :? 1 ';) NUMBER DF LANES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB 58 LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION -----------------..--------------------------------------------------------- % SLJ TRUCKS AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND e .,.J 5 o WESTBOUND ,- Cl 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL ClAPS ._---------------------_._..._._~~_._---------_._-----------.------------------------ T ABULAF: VALUES (Table 10-2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. ADJUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP MINOF: F:IGHTS sa 6.10 E,.10 0.00 5.00 ~lAJOI? LEFTS EB ~j. 30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOF: LEFTS !:3B 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATTON -------.---.----.--------.-..---.--.-.---------------.-.--.---------.--------.-.------------ NA~lE OF THE EAST /~JEST STF:EET...... NYS TF:UCK F~OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NA~lE OF THE NORTH/SOUTH '3TREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1,,-1 '3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEf<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTlIF.:E NO BUILD WITH AU13/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GF:OWTH FACTOI': I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(p.:ph) 0: (po:ph) .: (po:ph) 0: (po:ph) 0: = 0: - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT 1 2'34 284 .,:' :284 .' 282 > ,-. 619 > 597 >A ,. 660 '. 639 > A RIGHT 21 660 660 MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 41 f,59 659 G59 619 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------.----------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NVS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DA TE AND T II"IE OF" THE ANAL VS IS. . . .. 6-01-1 '393 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTlJPE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5VR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HeM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNN I NG SPEED, 11AJOR STREET.. 45 PEAI< HOUR FACTOR..................... . 9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...... . f( IRf(UP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD ,J. SHARSI<Y P.E., p.e. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rnm/dd/yy)..... . 6-01--1 '3')3 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEI<DAY OTHER INFORI1ATION.... Fun/FE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTl1ENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I NTEF:SECT I ON TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------~--~.__.._------------------- --...--.--------.-----.--------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIPFCTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND, STOP SIGN TRAFF I C VOUJI1FS ----------------.------------------------------------------------------- FB ~m NB 58 LEFT I) 4 ,~ .:;, THRU 581 50':J I) RIGHT I) I) '" .., NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB G8 LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION -.--.-.----------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TRUCI<S AND RV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICL.ES Yo MOTORCYCLES ------------- EASTBOUND 5 ~ .., o ~JESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- T ,'BULAF: VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -----------.------- --------- .-.----------- ------------ MINOR F:IGHTS ND c. 1.0 F,. 10 0..00 5.00 MA.Jl1R LEFTS WB 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATIO~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME m- THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF:UCf< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NDRTH/SOUTH STREET.... f<IF:KUP LANE DATE AND TIME or THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEfC:DAY DTHER INFOF:MATIClN.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AIJI3/.TUN AD.JUSTt1ENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-(]F-SERVICE Page-3 -----------.---------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEt1ENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) (~ (pcph) ': (pcph) ': (pcph) c = 0: - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT ~ 305 303 )- 303 '" 300 '. C w " .' '. 403 > 396 >B ..' ." 600 600 '. 600 > 597 > A ~ MA.IOR STf;:EET WB LEFT 5 600 €,OO 600 596 A !DENT I FY I NG I NFOF:MA TI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STf;:EET...... NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/!30UTH STREET.... f(IRI<UP LANE DATE ,\ND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEI(DAY OTHER INFTlr:::MATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR CiROWTH FACTOr::: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 .******************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.. . . .. . . .. . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECK ROAD NAME OF THE Ar"AL YST .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWARD J. SHARS/t:Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I NTERSECT I ON TYPE AND CONTF.:OL ---------~----~--------_._-----------------_._------------------------------ INTERSECTION riPE: T-INTERSECTION MA,JOF~ STREET DIF.:ECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTllBOUND: STOP !J I GN TRAITIC VlJLUMES ---------------------------------------------------.------------------- EB '"jB NB S8 LEFT ~'":' I) 70 dd THRU 547 480 0 RIGHT 0 114 '"'\.-. .::t.'::' NUMBER lJr LANES ------.--------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 ,-, ..:: 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS _._-----------~-- --~._..._--------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- 'l. SU TRUCf<S AND F:V'S 'l. COMBINATION VEHICLES 'l. t1lJTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o t~ESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAr<: VALUES ADJUSTED S I '3HT DIST. FINAL (T;.ble 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ._~ --...,.- -- -.-- --- -.-- ------.-.--- -----.------- ------------ M I NOF: F: I GHTS SB E,. 10 6~ 1,0 0.00 5.00 MAJOF: LEFTS ED 5.80 5..80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.':Kl 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------.----------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF:TH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK POAD DA TE AND T I ME OF THE t\NAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01--19'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDA Y OTHER INFOPMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH ALlI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GF.:OWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOI,J- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT v(pcphl .: (pcphl .: (pcph) .: (pcphl c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET S8 LEFT RIGHT 79 36 296 862 284 862 284 862 205 825 C A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT :3'3 591 5'31 591 552 A IDENTIFYING INFORtlATION -----.----------.-------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEf<DAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTUPE NO BUILD WITH AUGIJUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNS I GNALI ZED I NTERSECTI ONS Page-l *******************************************.~************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------_______________.__M_____________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST ~JTREET . . . . . . . . . NYS Tr;;:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 6-01-1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5,,-6 Pt1 WEEf<DA Y OTHEr;;: INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECTI ON TYPE: T- I NTEF.:SECT ION MA,JOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------.--.------------------------------------------------------------- EB I,JB ~IB SB LEFT 0 l) 157 THRU 51l:, 437 0 F.:IGHT 0 I) I') NUMBER OF LANES ---------------.------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB LANES :2 2 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS <: ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- -----____._ _______M_________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 91) 20 N WESTBOUND 1).1)1) 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 1).00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND-.---- VEH I CLE COMPOS I T ION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'l. SU TRUCKS AND RV'S 'l. COMBINATION VEHICLES 'l. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ~ d o WESTBOUND ~ '-' e -, o NORTHBOUND 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL '3APS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR V,\LUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL (Tt:~ble 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -_....- - --- -. - -- -- - - -- ----.--.-- .-----.------- ----------.-- 11I NOR F:IGIHS i'JB c. 10 e 10 0.00 5.00 -I. ~lA,JOR LEFTS WEt 5.80 ~;.80 0.00 5.00 M I NoF: LEFTS NB 7.'30 7.'30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYIN';! INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /~jEST !3TREET...... NYS TF:lJCK F:OUTE ;,5 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NIJFUH/SOUTH STREET.... M IDIlLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 1 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTUF:E NO BUILD WITH AlJl3/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR '3ROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) -: = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- ._------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 177 21 370 903 370 903 370 '303 193 881 D A MAJOR STREET we LEFT o 652 652 652 552 A IDENTIFYING INFORt1ATION ----------------.----..----------------------.---------~-----------._--------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STF.:EET.... MIDDLE ROAD DA TE AND T H1E OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-01-1993 ; 5--5 PM WEEKDA Y OTHEF.: INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD I~ITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'385 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .'3 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSI(Y P.E., p.e. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . 6-1) 1-1'3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12--1.PM SA TlJPDA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: !3TOP SIGN l'RAFF I 0:::: VOLUMES ------------------------.---------------------------------------------- EB t~B N8 SB LEFT 35 0 ..,. ~ THPU FA4 422 0 PIGHT C) '3 8 NUMBEP OF LANES ---------------------.--------------------------------------------------- E8 WB NB S8 LANES 1. 1 1. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE 13RADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ---.....--- ----------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----.- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION .----------------------------------------.------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOLlND 5 5 o I~ESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES AD.JUSTED SIGHT DIST. FI NAL Crab I", 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL (lAP ~___._~_ u__ __________ ---------- -----...-------- -------------- mNOP F:IGlfTS 58 (:," 10 f;,. 10 0.00 5.00 MAJOP LEFTS EEl 5. :30 5. :30 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS SB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST / WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK r;:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'3'33 ; 12--1F'M SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUI3/.TUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-ar--SERVICE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(po:phl 0: (pcphl 0: (pcphl 0: (pcphl c = c .- y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEr-T .~ "- 300 290 RIGHT '3 '734 734 " 290 ~~ 288 > C .' " 552 > 551 >A " ~:. 734 , 725 > A MAJOR STF.:EET EB LEr-T 4:;~ 730 730 730 588 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------_________.__~M____~__R______________~__________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST / ~JEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME DF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... BEF.:GEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME DF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'393 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY (]THEP I NFORMATIClN. ... FUTURE NO BUILD HITH AUG/.TUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR 13F.:OWTH FACTOF.: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . f(! Rf<:UP LANE NAME OF THE ANAL YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E., P.C. DATE OF THE ANAL Y!3 I S (mm/dd/yyl...... 6-01.-1993 TItlE FOEF: I 00 ANALyZED................ . 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTUF:E NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECT I ON TYPE: T -- I NTEF.:SECT I ON MAJOF.: STF.:EET D I F:ECT I ON: EAST /WEST CONTF.:OL TYPE NCWTHBOUND: !:nOP SIGN !RAFT I C VOLUt1ES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB 5B LEFT 0 1 0 THRU (7.;46 4:32 r) R I13HT 0 0 1 NUMBEP OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NO SB LANES 1 I. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F:IGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N SOUTHBOUND ------ VEHICLE COMPOSITION __.______R__________~____________________________._______________________ I. SU TRUCf':S AND RV'f1 I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MOTOF.:CYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL OAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR V,'\LUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Tabl(~ 10-2) VALUE ADJUSH1ENT CRITICAL GAP .._.___~.~R_______ -.----------... .._.._--------~--- ....------------ MINOR RIGHTS NB 6.. 10 6. 10 0..00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS WB ~.~.. 30 5.30 0.00 5.00 ~1I NOR LEFTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOF':MATIDN --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME DF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCf( F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME DF THE NORTH/SOUTH STF.:EET.... f(IF:I<UP LANE DATE AND TI~lE DF THE r'NALYSIS..... 6-01.-19'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOPI1ATIO"'.... FUTUF.:E NO BUILD WITH AUr3/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR (iROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-3 POTEN.- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(p.:ph) Co (peph) e (peph) e (peph) .: = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT o 310 310 " 310 > 310 :> B ..:. 553 > 552 :>A " 553 ", 552 '" A ..' ,.' " RIGHT 1 553 553 MAJOR STREET we LEFT 1 553 553 553 552 A I DENT I FY I NG I NFOlmA T ION ----------------------------------------.----------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI:: POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE J NAME OF THE NDPTH/f:JOUTH STREET.... KIRKUP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... E,'-Ol-1'3'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHEF: INFllPMATIlJN.... FUTl..IF.:E NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YF.: GROWTH FACTOF.: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTI FV I NG I NFORMA TI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...... . COX NECI< ROAD NAME OF THE ANAL YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSI<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . 5--01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ . 1:2-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CDNTF.:OL -------------------- ----.------------------..--...----.--------------.----------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOU1~BOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFT I C VDLU~1ES -----------------------.---------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT .-,1::' I) 108 ..::'w THF.:U (:,22 40'3 I) RIGHT 0 J.30 23 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .~ .c :2 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTt1ENT FACTORS -------------------------.-------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT PIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE rOR RIGHT TURNS rOR F:IGHT TURNS .------- ----------- -----~-------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------- I. SU TRUCKS AND F:V'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MDTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o L~ESTBOUNJ) 5 ~ '-' o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL BAPB --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. rINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ... -.--- -- -.", --.-------- --- ------.--..-- ------------- .----------.--- MINOR R I GilTS GB r.:; ~ 1.0 E.. 10 0.00 5.00 t'lAJOF: LErTf:3 EB 5.80 ~).80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS SB 7.90 7. '30 0.00 5.00 I DENT I FY I NG I NFORi"IA 1'1 ON ---------.----------.--- ._--_.._._-------------------_._---~_.._-----------_.-.--.------------ NAME DF THE EAST II"JEST STPEET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK F:OAD DATE AND TIME DF TilE ANALySIS..... 6--01--1'3'33 ; 12-1F'M SATURDAY DTHER INFDF.:MATION.... FUTURE NO BUILD LHTH AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR I3F:OWTH rACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POT EN- ACTUAL FLOl~- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(p.:ph) .: (pcph) .: (pcph) c (pcph) c "" c - v LOS p M SH R SH ---.---- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET S8 LEFT RIGHT 122 26 294 891 286 891 286 891 164 865 D A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT :30 631 f:,31 631 601 A IDENTIFYING INFOF.:I'lATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECK ROAD DATE AND TII1E OF THE ANALySIS..... 6'-01.,1';)';)3 ; 12-1PM SATUJ;:DAY OTHER INFOF:MATIDN.... FUTURE NO BUIt.D WITH AUG/.JUN ADJUSTMENT'" 5YR GROWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'385 HCM: UNSIGNALlZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .'3 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANAtM Yf.~.r.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWAf;:D ,J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-01. -1. '3'33 TIME PER I eJD ANALyZED................ . 1. ;2'-l.P~1 SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... F-UTURE NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5YR GROWTH FACTOR INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECTI ON TYPE, T - I NTERSECTI ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NOR1~BOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFF I C VOLUt1EfJ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EB ~m NS B8 LEFT I) 0 13'3 THRU 612 3'3'3 0 RIGHT 0 0 25 NUMBEP OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES .-, ..::. .... ..::. .... "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSn1ENT F"ACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB F.:ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 v SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION .--------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND PV'S % COMBINATION VEHICL.ES % MOTOF.:CVCL.ES EASTBOUND ~ "' 5 n WESTBOUND ~ ".I ,- ,j o NOF.:THDOUND 1. 1. o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS ------------------.----------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (T~,hlp. 1.0-2) VAL.UE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -- -_._- ---. ._---------- ..._-----~--_._-- ..--...---------- ..------------ t1 I NOR PIGHTS N8 [,. 11) ~ 10 0.00 5.00 ..J. MA,JOP LEFTS tJD 5.80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7. ':11) 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFVINI3 INFDRt1ATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF.:EET...... NVS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTH/DlJUTH DTPEET.... MIDDLE F.:OAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAV OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... FUTUF.:E NO BUILD WITH AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT + 5VR GF.:OWTH FACTOR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL"-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVE~lENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(p.:ph) .: (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = .: - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 157 28 343 852 343 852 343 852 186 824 D A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 578 578 578 578 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --~----_._---____.___~_M_________________R____.__M_.___________________________ NAME OF THE EAST /~)EST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... t1IDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01.-1'393 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER I NFOPMA TI lJN. . .. FUTURE NO [lU I LD WITH AUG/ JUN AD.Jt.JSTMENT + 5YR CiPOWTH FACTOP I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Capacity Analyses Future Conditions with Macari and Five Year Growth Factor plus August/June Adjustment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Weekchy I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI ZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 .~******************************************************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------.------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TF.:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH !3TF.:EET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARS~;:Y P.L, P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-01-1 '393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ . ~i'-6 PM WEEI(DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUTURE WITH MACARI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEF.:SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTIoN MAJOR STREET DIF.~CTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SCUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRArr" I C IlnLU~1ES -----------------------------------------.----------------------------- EB t,m NB SEt LEFT 34 () 1 THRU 588 511 0 RIGHT 0 .. 19 .'- NLJMBEF.: OF LANES ------------------.--------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 1 t 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT FUGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS -----.-- ---------- ---------------- --------.--------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- % SU TRUC/(S AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTOr;:CYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 I) CRITICAL. GAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- T'ABlJLAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (T.3bl., 10-2) VALUE ADJU!3TMENT CRITICAL GAP - ---.-- --_.---- -- ---- -------...--. ------------ ------------- MINOr;: F: IGHTS SB 6. 10 6. 10 0.00 5.00 MA,JlJR LEFTS EB 5. ~~O 5.30 0.00 5.00 t'1I NOR LEFTS BB '7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOF.:MATION .---------.------------.------------.---.------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST /~,IEST STF:EET...... NYS TF.:UC/< F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STF.:EET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01--1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHEF: I NFOF.:I'1A nON. . .. 5YR FlJTUPE ~I ITH MACAR I + AUf3 / JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ----------------------.-----------------.----------.---------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FL.OW- HAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(p.:ph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- H.________ --------- ---~--------- ------------ m NOR STREET S8 LEFT 1 289 278 278 ,. 277 > >A 634 > C > 614 > 591 RIGHT :21 656 656 .> 656 '. ,.. A MAJOR STREET E8 LEFT 41 655 655 655 614 A IDENTIFYING INFOF.:~WTION ----------____.___..______.HN__~~.__________.__________________________________ NAME DF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NlJRTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DA TE AND T I ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01--19'33 ; 5--6 PM WEEKDA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YF: FUTURE WITH MACA"':I + AUG/JLJN AD.JU8TMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAUZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l * *************'*****-M'-M.***.*************.....J(.****************************** IDENTI FY I "'G I NFORMA TI ON ---------------------------____________MM______________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE .~'" [SOUND AVEJ "::'kJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . K I Rf<UP LANE ~rAME OF THE ANAL.YST................. . EDWAPD J. ~3HARS~:'Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . E.-O 1-1 '393 TIME PERIOD ANAL.YZED................. 5-6 PM ~JEEKDA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUTUPE WITH MACAPI + AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEPSECT I ON TYPE AND C:ONTPOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-[NTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST I::ONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TF:AFF I C VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LEFT EB WB NB 5B 0 11 6 57'3 507 0 '3 0 6 THRU F:IGHT NUt1BER CJF LANES -----------------.--.--.---.----------------------------------------------- E8 WB "'8 S8 LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PEF.:CENT PIGHT TURN CURB PAD IUS C:ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR PIGHT TURNS ""OR RIGHT TURNS ------- .---------- -~------_._------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 :20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N SOUTHBOUND ------ VEHICLE COMPOSITION ._-------_.~_._---_._._----._------~-------------------------------------------- f. SU TPUCI<S AND PV'S f. COMBINATION VEHICLES f. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~ ,-I 5 o WESTBOUND ~ ..-, 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CR I TICAL ':iAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP V,'\LUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. rr NAL (Tabl., 10-::2:> VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP .-- .., -- -- - -- - -- --.- ... .... --- --.-------.. .------------ ..------------- MINDP F: I GIlTS NB ~:'.. 10 6. 10 0..00 5.00 t-lA,JOP LEFTS WR ~)" 30 5.30 0.00 5.00 ~lINOR: LEFTS NR 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTH-YING INFOR:MATION ------------.---.---.------.---------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET...... NYS TF:UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTH STF:EET.... KIF:KUP LANE DA TE AND T I ME DF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-01-19'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<:DA Y OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5YF: FUTUPE WITH MACAF:I + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(po::ph) 0:: (po::ph) .: (po::ph) .: (pcph) c = 0:: - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- -.----------- ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT 7 302 298 " 298 " 291 >- C ,,' / > 398 .... 384 >B " 5'39 599 > 59'3 :> 592 > A RIGHT 7 MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 13 5'35 595 595 582 A IDENTIFYING INFOF.:MATION ------------------.------------------------.---------------.--...---------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCI< F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... KIRKUP L.ANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-19'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEf<DAY OTHER I NFOfmATIlJN. '.. 5YR FUTURE WITH MACARI , AUG/.TUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HeM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST /l~EST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOPTII/ SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NEC*: F.:OAD NAME OF THE ANfll_ YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAf~D J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... G --<) 1'-1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER I NFOF.:MA TI ON. . .. 5YP FlHlIRE WITH MACAR I + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION t1A.JOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND, STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- FB l.JB NB SB LEFT ~~.:l I) 70 THF.:lI 551 48f, 0 F.:H,HT 0 1 14 -:'l"::' ww NUMBEF.: OF' LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 L.ANES ,~ "- ,.., ,~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------~--_._---------------_._._----------------------------- r. SLJ TRLJCf<S AND I?V'S r. COMBINATION VEHICLES r. t1lJTOF.:CVCLES EASTBOUND ~1 ~ ., o i.JESTBOUND ,.: d 5 o NOfHHBlJUND SOUHIBOUND 1 I_ o CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- fABULAP VALUES ADJUSTED S I13HT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-:;::) VALUE AD,JUSTMENT CRITICAL ClAP --.._---- -------- --- .-- ------..._,,-- ------.------ ------------- MINOR PIGHTS 58 F 10 6. 10 0.00 5.00 ..,. MAJOP LEFTS EB ~.1.. 80 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOF.: LEFTS SB 7.90 7.'30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFVING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST f3TREET...... NVS TRUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME elF" THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NEe!< ROAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL VS IS. . . .. (',-01--1 "393 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDA V OTHER INFORMATION.... 5VF( FUTURE WITH ~lACARI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ----------------~----------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVE~lENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT 79 2'31 279 279 200 C RIGHT 37 858 858 858 821 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 41 587 587 587 546 A I DENTI FY I NG I NFOF.:MA TI ON ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STPEET...... NYB TRUCI< POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX NECI< POAD DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-1) 1--1993 ; 5-5 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHER INFORMATIIJN.... 5YR FUTUPE WITH t1ACARI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------ ----~------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . IH DDLE POAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... (,-01-1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEKDAY OTHEF: I NFOF:MAT r ON. . .. 5Yf;: FUTURE WITH 11ACAR I + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECT I ON TYPE: T'- I NTEF.:SECT I ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE NIJI?THBOUND: STOP SIGN IPAFT I C VULUMEE; --.--------------------------------------.----------------------------- EB WE! NB SB LEFT I) I) 15'3 THF:U 519 442 0 RIGHT 0 I) 1'3 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTOPS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND .------ VEHICLE COMPOSITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- %. SU TF:UCf<:S AND PV'S %. COMBINATION VEHICL.ES %. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1. 1. o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL FiAPS ----------- ---------...------------..-.--------.---------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 1.0,-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP . -. .-..---.---- ------- .- -- - ..- --.-.--- .------------ ------------ MINOR F: IGHTS NEt G. to ~ 10 0.00 5.00 ~J . MA.JOP LEFTS (,If.! ~). De) ~).80 0.00 5.00 tH NOR LEFTf'> NEt 7. ';;)0 "7" ~)O 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I\~EST STREET...... NYS TRUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NlJPTH/SlJUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F:lJAD DATE AND TIME DF THE ANAL.YSIS..... (;,--01--1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY UTHER INFOF:MATHJN.... 5YR FUTUF:E WITH MACARI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--Or--SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLO~J-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC !TY CAPAC !TY CAPAC !TY CAPAC !TY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (p':ph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- -----.---- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEr-T RIGHT 179 21 366 '301 :366 901 366 901 187 880 D A MAJOR STREET W3 LEFT (l 649 64'3 64'3 649 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------~-------_._-~--------_._----------_._._---~-------.---------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE :25 (SOUND AVE] NAME Or- THE NORTH/SOUTH STF.:EET.... MIDDLE ROAD DA TE AND TI ME Or- THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) t -1 9'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<OA Y OTHER I Nr-OPMA TI ON. . .. 5YR FUTUPE WITH t1ACAR I + AUG / JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-I **************-M'** ""'Jf-**.**************.******.**.************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------.-------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANAL YST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAf<:D ,J. SHARSI(Y P.E. , P.r::. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 5-01-1 '393 TIME PEF.: 100 ANAL Y Z ED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t2-IPM SATUF.:OAY OTHER I NFORMA TI ON. . .. 5YR FUTURE WITH t1ACAR I + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEF.:SECT I ON TYPE r,ND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST UJNTPOL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: !3TOP !3 I GN TF:ArT I C \.-'DUJt1ES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ED IJB NB SB LEFT '-,r.::- n .,~, ,:J....J ,- THRU 653 427 0 RIGHT I) '3 8 NUMBEF.: OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB t',IB 5B LANES t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------~------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ____8___ ._._________ .________________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ___n___ SOUTHBOUND 0.00 "75 50 N 'JEH I CLE CDt1POS I T I ON ------------------..---------------------------------------------------- :: SU TRUCf':S AND P'J'S /. COMBINATION VEHICLES /. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUt,1D ~ ...J ~ ...J o WESTBOUND ~ ,.J 5 o NDPTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL CiAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- r,'\BULAR 'JALUES Cr.'1b I," 1 o-~;:) ADJUSTED 'JALUE SIGHT DIST. ADJUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP MINOP PIGHTS !3B (=;,.10 FI.10 0.00 5.00 ~lA,JOr;: LEFTS tef) ~5. 30 5.30 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS fiB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFlWt"'ITION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUI\ID AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/GOUTH STREET.... BERGEN A'JENUE DATE AND TIME OF HIE ANALySIS..... 6-01--1'3'33 ; 12.-1PM SATURDAY DTHER I NFOF.:MA TI DN. . .. ~';YP FUTURE ~J ITH ~lACAF.: I + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL.-OF'-SEF.:VICE Page-3 .--------------------------------------------.-------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT YC:pcph) c C:pcph) c C:pcph) c C:pcph) ': = c - Y LOS p M SH R SH -----_._-- -.-------- ---.------ ------------- ------------ MINOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT 2 295 284 '. 284 282 > C ..' " ~)56 > 544 >A ...- ,) 72') 72') > 729 ..' 720 )- A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 42 725 7 ,,,:,e ~:-...l 725 684 A IDENTIFYING INFOF.:MATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF.:EET...... NYS TRUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF TilE ANALySIS..... 6-01--1')93 ; 12-1PM SATUF:DAY OTHER INFORMATIlJN.... ~.WF.: rUTUF.:E I~ITH t'lACAF:I + AUG/JUN AD,JUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIt3NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOF.:TH / SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . fc:I RKUP LANE NM1E OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD J. SHAPSf<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rnm/dd/yy)..... . 5-01-1993 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5YP FUTURE WITH t1ACAr.~I .. AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------. --- -~------ ---------------------------------------------- INTEPSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL. TYPE NOPTIIDOUND: HTOP !:; I '::iN lRAFF I C \llJLUt1ES -------------------.----------------------------.------------------------ EB hlB !\IS SB LEFT I) G ~ ._J THRU 644 430 0 F:IGHT '''I I) 8 NUMBEF.: UF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB W8 NB S8 LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------~------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB F.:AD I US (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N StJUTHBOUND -----. VEH I CLE COMPOS IT ION _______________MH.__.M..___.________...________________.______________________________ I. SU TPUCI'::S AND F:V'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES I. MtJTORCYCLES EASTBOUND r. ...I ~ d o WESTBOUND <~ '-' 5 o NORTHBtJUND I. 1 I) SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL ClAPS ----------------.------------------------------------------------------ TA8ULAR VALUES (Tahle 10-~::) AD,JU!3TED VALUE !3IGHT DIST. ADJUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP ~1I NOF: P ICiHTS N8 6.10 [i. 10 0.00 5.00 ~IA,.TlJF: LEFT~, (~B 5.30 5.30 0.00 5.00 M I NOF: LEFTS NB 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFOPMATION --------.--------------------------------.----------------------------- NAME OF TIE EAST/WEST STPEET...... NYS TPUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOPTH/SOUTII STPEET.... KIPf<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER HWlJRMATI lJN. . .. 5YF: FUTURE 1.J ITH ~lAI::AF: I + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ----M____._M_______M___~_____________________M_____________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAPED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c '" c - y LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ MINOR STPEET NB LEFT RIGHT E, ~~O8 306 '. 306 ..' 300 '. B ..' ..' 421 > 407 >A '3 552 552 / 552 .... 543 " A ..' MAJOR STREET WB L.EFT 7 ~:;48 548 548 541 A IDENTIFYING INFormATION -----.----.---------.--. -..,.--- ---------------.-----------.--------.----------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST GTPEET...... NYS TRUCI, POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE rmRTH/SOUTII STREET.... lo::IF:J::HP L.ANE DATE AND TU1E OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--1']'33 ; 12--1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFOPMATION.... 5YR F"I.JTURE WITH tlACARII AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSH3NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------.--.---.---....-..-.-.--------.---.---------...-----.----...-----------------------------.. AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STREET......... NYB TRUCK POUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE HOF.:TH/SOUTH f3TPEET....... COX NECI< POAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . ........ .. . .. . . . . . FDWAPD ,J. r:;HAPSI<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF TilE ANALYSIS (mm/ddlyy). . ...... .. 6-1) 1,--1 '3'33 TIME PEPIOD ANAL.YZED. . . . . .......... .. .......... .. 12-1PM SATUF:DAY OTHEP I NFOF.:MATI ON. ... 5YP FUTURE WITH MACAr~I I- AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEPSECTION TYPE AND CONTRIJL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEP5ECTION TYPE: T-IHTERSECTION MAJOR STPEET DIPECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE :30UTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TPAFE I C VOLUt1F.S -----------------.--------------------------------.------------------------- F.B (~B NS 5B LEFT 26 I) 108 THRU 628 413 o ,. F.: II3HT ;.. I) 130 :24 ~rUMDER IW LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB ~J8 NB S8 LANES ..:. ..,.. .,:~ .~ .:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F.:IGHT TURN CURB F.:ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE '3RADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ----.--- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 ':10 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- r. SU TRUCI<S AND PV'S r. COMBINATION VEHICLES r. MlJTORCYCLES EASTBOUND c: ".I 5 o WESTBOUND ,- ,:) e .J o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL ':lAPS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- T,'IBULAF.: VALUES ADJUfJTED ,lIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10..-2) VALUE AD.JUSTMENT CRITICAL 13AP ._._ OM_ .._ M.. __. _ __ _ .._ .____ __ __ __ ...M _.. ___ "------.------ -_._---------- MINOR RIGHTfJ SB 6. 10 E,. 10 0.00 5.00 r'1A.JOF.: LEFTS EB 5.00 5..80 0..00 5.00 mNOR LEFTS SB 7.90 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION .-----------------------------.----------------------------------------- NAME DF THE EAST IWEST STF.:EET...... NYS Tf<:UCI< F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF T~E NOF.:TH/8DUTH STF.:EET.... COX NECK ROAD DA TE AND T HIE m- THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. E,-O 1...-1 '3'33 ; 12--1 PM SA TUPDA Y OTHEP I~IFOF.:r1ATIlJN.... ~Wf<: FUTUF.:E WITH ~'IACAPI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 ---------------------------.------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FL.OW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ----~.~-- --.------- ---------- ------------ ------------ ttI NOR STREET SB LEFT RIGHT :1.22 :27 290 888 281 888 281 888 159 861 D A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 31 628 628 f;,28 597 A IDENTIFYr~~ INFORMATION ------------------_.. -.--...---....---...-- -.-------------------......-.-------.--------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I,^JEST STREET...... NYS TF.:IJCf( F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NlJRTH/f30IJTH tlTREET.... COX NECI< POAD DATE AND TI ME IJF TilE ANAI._ YS IS. . . .. 5-01--1 ')')3 ; 12-1 PM SATURDAY lJTHER I NFlJRt1A TI ut~. . .. 5YR FUTUPE ,^J I TH MACAP I + AUG/.JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSII3NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* I DENT! F"Y I NI3 I NF"ORMAT! ON ----------------------- _._----_._------_._~..._.-._._------------------------- AVERAGE RUNN I NI3 SPEED, tlAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR F"ACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST /~JEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK POUTE .~~ [SOUND AVEJ "::"u NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STF.:EET. . . . . . . M !DOLE ROAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD J. SHARSfO:Y P.E. , P.c. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 5-1) 1'-1')'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. l~-lPM SATURDAY IJTHER INFOF:tlATION.... 5YR FUTURE WITH MACARI <- AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEF.:SECTION TYPE, T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTIUN: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE ~mRTHROUND: STOP SIGN TF:AFr I C VfJl....I...IMEf-3 ---------------------------.---------.----------------------------------- EB WB "'B SB LEFT I) I) 140 THRU 617 40:2 I) RIGHT I) l) 25 NUMBER OF LANES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- EE< WE< "'B SB LANES :2 .~ .:. .~ ..::. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F.:II3HT TURN CURB F.:ADIUS <: ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ----~------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 :20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 'Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION -------_._---------~_.__._--._----------------------------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND RV'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND ~::; 5 o WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CF.: I TICAL. "jARS .------------.--------------------------------------------------------- T,\BULAP VN..UES O>\b leI 0-;::::> ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. AD.TUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAR NINOP RIGHTS NB C).10 5.10 0.00 5.00 MAJOR LEFTS l~B ~5. 80 5.00 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NB 7,'30 7.'30 0.00 5.00 I DENT I F'Y I NG I NFOF.:MA TI ON ------------------------------------------------------.---------------- NAME OF HIE EA~JT /WEST STF:EET....,. NYS TRUCK F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE F:OAD DATE A~m TINE OF TIE ANALySIS..... 6-01-19'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY IJTHEF: I NFCIPMA TI ON. . .. 5YF: r.UTUF:E H ITH MACAF.: I + AUG / JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 --------_.__._~-----~----_._-----------_._---_._---------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW.- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) (: (pcph) c (pcph) ': (pcph) c -. c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -----.--- _____M____ -.----------- ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 158 28 339 849 339 84'3 339 849 181 821 D A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT o 574 574 574 574 A I DENTI FY I NG I NFORMA rI ON -----------.------------.--.---.---------------------.-------------------...--------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SDUTH STF.:EET.... m DDLE ROAD DA TE AND TI ~lE OF THE ANAL 'is IS. . . .. 6-01-19'33 ; 12...1 PM SA TURDA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... ,WR FUTURE WITH I1ACAPI + AUG/JUN ADJUSTI"IENT Capacity Analyses Future Conditions with All Projects and Five Year Growth Factor plus August/June Adjustment I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~eekrl"y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1'385 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME DF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRIJCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NM1E OF THE ANAL Y!TL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSf<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... 1',-01-1 '3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-1', PM. WEEKDAY OTHER I NFOF:MATI ON. . .. 5YR FUTURE + ALL PRO,TECTS + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT TNTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL .----------------..-------------------------------------------------------- INTER~,ECTIllN TYPE: T-INTEF:SECTION MAJOR STPEET D IFTCTI ON: EAST/WEST CONTPOL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP !:3I t3N TPAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------.--...---------------------------------------------- EB ~JB NB SB LEFT :34 I) 1 I'HPU E.l 1 523 I) RIGHT 0 ."", 1'"-' .... NUMBER OF L.ANED --------.--.-..---.--.-------.------..---------------------------.-------------------- EB WB NB 5B LANES 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT rUGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE rOR RIGHT TURNS rOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- -------.----.----- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND ,----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION -------_.- ---------.-----.---.-----------------.--------------------------- r. SU TRUCf(S AND RV'S r. COMBINATION VEHICLES r. MOTORCYCLES EASTBOlJt~D ~ "I ~ d o t"'ESTBOUND ,- ,J 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND I I o CPITICAL nAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TMJUL..Af': VALUES (T;.!\blr~ 10-2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. ADJUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP MINor;: F:Imns SB C.IO f..IO 0.00 5.00 MA,TlJr::: L.Ef'- n3 EB 5.:30 5.30 0.00 5.00 11 I NOR LEFnJ SB "7.40 "7.40 0.00 5.00 I DENT U'Y I NG I NnJFmA T I DN -------------------------------------.---.----------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST /L~EST STf':EET...... NYS TPUCt< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF HIE NORTH/BOUTtl STREET.... BERGEN AVENUE DA TE AND T I ME DF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. f..-O I-I '3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEf<Dr'IY OTHER I NFOr:::MA TI ON. . .. 5Yf': FUTURE + ALL F'r:::OJECTS + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-Or-SERVICE Page-3 ------------------ -,._----~---._--------_..._._-_._--_._------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL n_ow-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c _. c - y LOS P M SH R SH' ------- ....------- -.-------- ------------ ------------ 11 INOR STREET S8 LEFT RIGHT l. 275 265 ":. 265 ":. 264 > ,- )- 602 '. 579 >A ..' 21 E,45 645 645 ". 623 > A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 41 644 644 644 603 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST lHREET...... NYS TPUCf':: ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SIJUTH STREET.... BEF.:GEN AVENUE DATE AND TI~lE OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--t'3'J3 ; 5--6 PM WEEKDAY OTHER I NFORMATI 01\1. . .. 5YR FUTUPE + ALL r'I'::D.JECTSI' AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-I ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION __________________M___________________________________________________ AVERA'3E F.:UNNING SPEED, t1AJoR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME DF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... NYS TRUCI< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . K I F.:I<UP LANE NAME OF" TilE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD ,J. SHAPSI<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF" THE ANALYcHS (mm/dd/yyl...... 6--(11-1 '3'3:3 TIME PERIIJD ANAI....YlED. . . " . . . . .. . . . . . . . 5-6 PM l~EEJ<DA Y OTHER INFoF.:MATIoN.... 5YR FUTUF.:E + ALL PRo,JEeTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTERSECT I 1JI~ TYPE AND CONTF.:OL. --------------------------------------------------.------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTloN MAJOR STREET DIPECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NornHBoUND: !3TOP SIGN TPAFF I C VlJIJJI1E!3 -----------------.-------------------.------------.-------.---------------- EB WE< NB SB LEFT 0 11 6 THPU ~S'35 ~.:;:24 0 PIGHT ':! I) 6 NUMBEI<: OF L.ANES ----------------------------------------------.-------------------------- EB HB "'B SB LANES t t t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR F: I GHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ----.--- .~~--------- .---.------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N SOUTHBOUND .----- VEH I CLE COMPOS IT ION -----.-------- -_._--_._.._~..._..~-----------_._---------------------------------- I. SU TRUCf':'S AND F:V'S I. COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 5 o ~JEST80UND e ,.J 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES (Ti\bl e 10'-2) ADJUSTED VAL.UE SHlHT DIST. AD,JUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP M I NOF: F: I GHTS NS F,.10 6.10 0..00 5.00 MA.TOF: LEFTS liB ~.:).. :::)0 ~). 30 0.00 5.00 MINOR LEFTS NS 7.40 7.40 0.00 5.(1) IDENTIFYING INFOPNATION -------------------.--------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/~JEST fHREET...... NYS TPUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE ~,I!JRTH/SOUTH STREET.... f::IRI<UP LANE DA TE AND TI ME OF THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1--1 ')93 ; 5--6 PM WEEI<DA Y IJTHEF: INFIJRt1ATION.... 5YR FUTUF:E + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL--DF-SERVICE Page-3 ----------------.-.-.-------------------------..----------------------------.- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcpfl) c (pcpfl) c (pcpfl) c (pcpfl) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ---------_._- ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 7 289 285 .' 285 > 278 " C .' ~:. 384 > 370 >B 7 587 587 ':. 587 > 580 > A MAJOR STREET we LEFT 1.3 584 ~j84 584 571 A I DENT I FY I NI3 I NFOR~1A TI ON ----.--.---.--.........----.---.-.-----.--.--------------..-.....- ..--..---.--------------.----------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME Dr THE NoF:TH/SOUTH STREET.... f<IR~::UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF l~E ANALySIS..... 6-01-1993 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDAY IJTHEF: I NFOF:I'1A TI UN. . .. 5YR rUTUF.:E + ALL PROJECTS + AUGI JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-t ********************************************************************* IDENTI FY I NG I NFORMA TI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE) NAME OF HIE NDfHH/SOIJTH STREET. . . . . . . COX NECI( Ii:OAD NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD .J. SHARm::Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 6-01. '-1 9'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEf<DA Y OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUTURE + ALL PRO,IECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTPOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SDunJr<OUND: :nop ~3IGN TPAFF I C VOLUMES -------------------------------------------.---------------------------- ED WB NB SB LEFT ":'\..,- 0 70 \../ ~ THPU ::.)61 50~3 0 F: IGHT 0 1 14 36 NUMBEr::: OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB "'B 5B L.ANES ::? '"":' .~ .~ ~::. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT F:IGHT TURN CURB F<~ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE 13RADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS -------- ---------- ------------------ ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo SU TRUCYS AND F.'V'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICLES Yo MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND r.::- ...! ., .-' o WESTBOUND 5 5 I) NOF:THBOUND SOUTHBOUND I 1 I) CRITICAL GAPS ----------------.----------------------------------------------------- T ADUL.AR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. F-INAL (TahIr.:.' 10..-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ......_...~_._----_.- __ __ - .__ __ __ .... ..n ---.-.--..-..- - ... ....-- --..------------ NINOP F: I GHTf3 58 c. 10 6. 10 I). 00 5.00 NA,J[)R LEFTS EB ~,j.. no 5.UO 0.00 5.00 ~1I NOF: LEFTS SB 7. 30 7. '30 0.00 5.00 I DENT I FY I NG I NFORMATI ON ---------------------.----.---.------------------------------------------ NAME m- TI.IE EAST/WEST STF.:EET...... NYS TRUCI<: F:DLJTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NOP1~/SOUTH STPEET.... COX NECK ROAD DA TE AND T I ME lJFe THE ,\NAL VS IS. . . " E,-'H --I '3'33 ; 5-6 PM WEEKDA Y OTHER I NFORMA TI ON. . .. 5YR FUTUF:E + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-DF"-SERVICE Page-3 __________~_M______._____M_____.__________.___._____________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL F"LOW- TI AI.. MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) 0: (pcph) c = c - y LOS p M SH R SH ---~----- -------- -----.---- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET S8 LEF"T IHOHT 79 41 280 849 267 849 267 849 188 809 D A 11AJOF~ STREET E8 LEF"T 44 574 574 574 530 A IDENTIFYIMJ INFrn~MATION -------.-------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STREET...... NYS TF.:UCf< ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME DF THE NClF.:TH/SOUTH STREET.... C::OX NECf< ROAD DA TE AND T U1E ore THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. C.-I) 1--1 ':;193 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHEF.: I NFOPMATI ON. . .. 5YR FUTURE + ALL F'PO.TECTS + AUGI JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *****iI'*,*'*iI'**'N-*-M'****",************** ****.Jj. if. *****************.************ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------.---------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TI':UCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME or THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . t1I DOLE ROAD NAME or THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAPD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yyl...... f';-f) 1--1'3'33 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 5-6 PM WEEf<DA Y OTHER INFOF.:MATION.... 5YP FUTUPE + ALL PPO,TECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEPSECTI ON TYPE (.,1\10 CClNTPOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- INTEPSECTION TYPE: T-TNTEPSECTION MA,JOR STPEET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST I:ONTF:OL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TPAFF I C: VOLIJt1ES --------------------.--.-----------------------.--------------------------- E8 W8 N8 58 LEFT 0 I) lEA THRU ~326 453 0 F:IGHT 0 0 1 '3 NUMBEF: Dr LANES -----.---------.-.----.--...--.----------------.------------------------------- EB WB NB 5B LANES ~~ .~ '" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 Y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON -------~---~----_.__._._------------------------_._------------------------ /. SU TRUCKS AND F,:V' S /. COMB I NA T ION VEHICLES /. MOTORCYCLES -------------- EASTBOUND ~:.) ~- .,.1 (I l<-lESTBOUND r.:~ .J ~ .J o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL GAPS --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES ADJUS"lED !3 I GHT DIST. FINAL ("fab 1 r~ 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CPITICAL GAP .-.-.-----.--- --- ---- ---.-------. .-.------.---- -..----------- MINOF.: Plf::ifHS NS 6. to ~ 10 0.00 5.00 ,J. tlAJDP LEFTS ~m 5.00 5.80 0.00 5.00 MINOP LEFTS NS 7.90 7.90 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYING INFORt-lATION ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME or THE EAST IWEST STPEET...... NYS TF.:UCI< F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME lJF THE NDPTH/SOUTH STREET.... MIDDLE POAD DA TE AND TI ME or THE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 5-1) 1--1 993 ; 5-6 PM WEEI<DA Y OTHEF.: INFOPMATION.... 5YP nJTUF.:E + ALL F'POJECTS + AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -----------------..-----.--.----------------.----------------------------- POT EN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC !TY CAPAC !TY CAPAC !TY CAPACITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - y LOS P M SH R SH ___M_~.~..__ -.------- --------- -_._--------- ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT J85 21 358 897 358 8'37 358 897 173 876 D A MAJOR nTPEET WR LEFT o 643 643 643 643 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EMH IWEST .STREET. . . . .. NYS TRUCI( ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE NOF.:TH/GOIJTH STREET.... t1IDDLE POAD DATE AND TI ME DI" nlE ANAL YS IS. . . .. 6-1) 1-1 9'33 ; 5--6 PM WEEKDA Y OTHEF: INFORt1ATION.... ;:5YF.' FUTURE + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Saturday I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSH,NALIZED INTERSECTIONS P....ge-1 ****.**.*.***********~********************w**************************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------_____________N___________________________ AVERAGE F.:UNN I NG SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAle: HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK F~OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . BERGEN AVENUE NAME OF THE ANALYST.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. II .. .. .. .. .. EDWAPD J. SHARSIe:y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . 6--01--1 '393 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12--1PM SATUPDAY OTHER INFOPt1ATION.... 5YR FUTURE + ALL PROJECTS + AU'3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I NTEF.:SECT I ON TYPE Atm CONTROL ----------------------.------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOP STPEET IHr.::ECTIlJN: EAST/WEST '::ONTRDL TYPE SDUTIIBlJUND: STOP GIGN lRAFF I C VDL.Ut1E5 --------------------------------------.------------------------------- EB (,JB NB SB LEFT ~e {) ,.7",J - THRU f,7f) ,'t:7J':) 0 RIGHT 0 ,) 8 NUMBER OF L.ANES ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB tlB SB LANES 1 1 1. -- --~-_._.- -_. ._.._----_._---~-~~-,-------,----=--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------.------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB F.:ADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ----.------- ------------------ ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND .----- SOUTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---.--------.-----.----------------------.---.---.----.-------------------------- % SU TRUCKS AND r.::\!' S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND I:~ 'oj 5 I) WESTBOUND ,~ ,..1 5 o NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND I. 1 o CPITICAL GAPS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAI;: VALUES l,Tahlp 10-2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. AD.JUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL C'iAP ~1I NOR P H:;HH, GEt C.10 (C,.10 0.00 5.(1) ~IA.J()F: L.EFTS ED rc: ~:JO = :":10 o. 00 = 00 '.J . ".1.. J. 7. 40 ~ 40 o. 00 5. 00 , . MINnr~ LEFn, SB IDENTIFYING I~FORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~~EST i3TPEET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NlJPTll/SOlJTH STPEET.... BEPGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME OF l~E ANALySIS..... 6-01.-1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY UTHER I ~IF[)P~1AT I UN" . .. 5YR FUTUPE I- ALL PPOJECTS I- AUGI JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -----------------------------------------.------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FU)\~-- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) I:: (pcph) c (pcph) c = '= - v LOS p M SH R SH ---.-.__...- ~~._------- ------.-.-- .------------- ------------ MINOR STREET S8 LEFT RIGHT' "' 281 271 271 269 > C > 540 ", 52'3 >A ,,' 'J 718 718 '} 718 709 > A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT 42 714 714 714 673 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -----------------------------------------.----------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET...... NYS TF:UCK F.:OUTE 25 [SOUND AI/E] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... DEPGEN AVENUE DATE AND TIME DF THE ANALySIS..... 5-01-19'33 ; 12-1PM SATUF.:DAY OTHEP I NFOPMATI UN. . .. 5YR FUTUPE + ALL r'PO.TEeTS + AUGI JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-l ********************************************************************* IDENTI FY I NG I NFOF<:MA T I ON -----------------~------------------------------____________M__________ AVERAGE PUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . KIRKLJP LANE NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWARD J. SHARSf<Y P.E. , P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy). . . . . . 6-0 j -1 '3'33 TH1E PER 100 ANAL.YZED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l:2-jPM SATURDAY OTHER I NFOPMA T I ON. . .. 5YP FLJTUF.:E + ALL PPOJECTS + AlJI:3/ JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTIDN TYPE AND CONTPOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTERSECT I ON TYPE: r ... I NTEPSECT I ON MAJOR STREET DIPECTION: EAST/WEST CONTPDL TYPE NOPTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TF.:AFF I C VOLUMES ---------.------------------------------------------------------------- FB ~JR NB 58 LEFT l) 5 e '" THRU 664 442 0 F.:IGHT '3 0 B NUMBEF<: OF LANES ----------.----------------------------.-------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LANES t 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ---------------------------------------.------------------------------ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB F.:AOIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS -______ __________8._ _______~__________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N SOUTHBOUND '--'---' VEHICLE COMPOSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Yo f:JlJ TRUCKS AND PV'S Yo COMBINATION VEHICL.ES Yo MDTORCYCLES EASTBOUND = .J 5 I) WESTBOUND 5 5 o NORTHBOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL OAPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES (Tf.!bl E~ 10,-2) ADJUSTED VALUE ~3IGHT DIST. AD,JUSTMENT F1 NAL CRITICAL GAP ~lINOR RIEiHTS NO b.1.0 f).10 0..00 5.00 ~lAJOR LEFTS liB 5. :::':0 5. ~10 0.00 5.00 MINOR L.EFTS NB '7.40 '7.40 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFY 1M3 INFDRMATION -------------------.-------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST ~3TREET...... NYS TRUCK ROUTE 25 r SOUND AVE] NAME or THE NORTllISOUTH STREET.... KIF.:I<lJP L.ANE DATE AND TIt1E or THE ANALySIS..... (=,-01--1.9'33 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUTURE + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF--SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------_._---------------~----------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOl~- TIAL MOVEMENT SHAF.:ED RESERVE RATE CAPAC ITY CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) (: (pcph) c (p.:ph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ----.---- .....-------- --------- -.------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT (, 296 ~'2'33 ...- 293 '. 288 > C 407 > 392 >B '3 537 537 ...- 537 , 528 >- A MAJOR STREET we LEFT 7 534 534 534 527 A I DENT I FY I N'3 I NFOF.:MA Tt ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCf( ROUTE :25 (SOUND AVE] NAME or- THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... I<IRI<UP LANE DATE AND TIME OF TilE "NALYSIS..... 6-01--1993 ; 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUTUF.:E + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* I DENT I FY I NG I NFOF:MA T I ON -.--------------------------------------.---.---------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR F- ACTOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. NYS TRUCK F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF TI-IE NORTH/SDUTH flTREET. . . . . . . COX NEC.':: POAD NAME DE THE ANAf_ YB1".. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. EDWARD J. SHARSKY P.E. , P.C. DATE DE THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... [,--01--1 '393 TIME PERIDD ANALyZED................. 12-IPM SATURDAY OTHEP I NFORt1A TI ON. . .. 5YF: FUTUF:E + ALL PPOJECTS + AUG/ JUN ADJUSTMENT INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -----------------.----------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MA.JlJP !3TPEET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBrnJND: STOP SIGN TRAFF I C V[]L_U~IE!3 --.---------------.-----------.---------.------..---.---------.------..------------ EEl I.-IB ~-IB SB LEF-T :;::,) I) 108 THRU f,43 4.:25 0 PIGHT I) :1.:30 25 NUMBER OF LANEf; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB W8 NB 5B LANES ..:.. 2 -~ "' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 --------------------------------------------------------------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB PADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE '3RADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TUF:NS FOR RIGHT TURNS _____M__ _._________ ______._M__.________ _________________ EASTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N NORTHBOUND ------ SOUTHBOUND 0.00 90 20 N VEH I CLE COMPOS IT I ON ----------------_.._-~-~--_._---------------------------------------------- )(, SU TRUCKS AND PV'S )(, COMBINATION VEHICLES )(, MOTOPCYCLES EASTBOUND 5 ~ _I I) WESTBOUND 5 1;::- ..J o NlJRTI-lBOUI\ID SOUTHBOUND 1 1 o CRITICAL GAPB --------------------------------------------------------------------- TABULAP VALUES (Table 10.-2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. AD.TUSTI1ENT FINAL CR I TICAL (jAP MINOR PIGHTS !3B C.. 10 C.I0 0.00 5.00 ItA.TOF: LEFTS EB ~5. BO ~~.). 80 0,,00 5.00 M I NOr;: LEFTS SEt "7" .:~O .7. '30 0.00 ~).oo IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NA~lE OF THE EAST I,^IEST !3TPEET...... NYS TPUCI< F.:OlJTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME IJF THE NORTH/!1OUTlI BTF:EET.... C:OX NECK POAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... C-01-1993 ; 12-1PM SATUPDAY OTHEP I "'FORMA TI ON. . .. 5YF: FlJTUF:E ~. ALL r:'PO.fECTS + AUI3/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF--SERVICE Page-3 ._-------------------~-------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITV CAPACITY CAPAC ITY MOVEMENT y(pcph) .: (pcph) c (pcph) .: (pcph) c -- c - y LOS p M SH R SH ---..-.---- -------- --------- ~------------- ------------ MINOR STREET S9 LEFT RIGHT :1.22 28 278 882 269 882 269 882 147 854 D A ~1A,TCJR STREET E9 LEFT :]5 (,19 [,19 619 585 A I DENTI FV I NG I NFormA TI ON --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STF:EET...... NVS TRUCI, F:OUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME Dr THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... COX ~IEU:: F:lJAD DA TE AND TI ME or-- THE ANAL VS IS. . . .. 6-01--1 ':1'33 ; 12-1 PM SA TURDA V OTHER INFOPt1ATION.... ~;VP r-lJTUF.:E + ALL PROJECTS + AUGIJUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********'*'********'***'****4.**************...*******.********************** IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------___________________w____________________________ AVEF.:AGE RUNNING SPEED, ~lAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR..................... .9 AREA POPULATION...................... 100000 NAME or THE EAST /~IEST STREET. . . . . . . . . NYS TRUO~ ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME OF THE 'NORTH/SOUTH fHREET. . . . . . . MIDDLE ROAD NAME or THE ANAL YST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDWAF:D J. SHARSKY P.E. . P.C. DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . [,-01-- 1'393 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................. 12-1PM SATURDAY OTHER INFOf~t1ATION.... ~5YF.: FUTURE + ALL PF:OJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT INTEF:SECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- I NTEF.:SECT I ON TYPE: r ,- I NTERSECT I ON MAJOR STF:EET DIF.:ECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE ~~RTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFT I C VCJLUI'1ES .-----------------..-----.-.--------------------.---..------------------------------ EB l~B N8 sa LEFT 0 0 143 THRU 52'3 410 0 F:IGHT 0 0 25 NUMBEF: or LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N8 S8 LANES :.::: :2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ________________w_____________________________________---------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ._---------~ ---------------- ----------------- EASTBOUND 0.00 '30 20 N WESTBOUND 0.00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0.00 75 50 y SOUTHBOUND ----- VEHICLE COMPOSITION -----------------.--- ------------------------------------------------------ % SU TPUCI<S AND r<:V'S % COMBINATION VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND r.:!' -.' 5 o WESTBOUND 5 ,- " o NORTHDOUND 1 1 o SOUTHBOUND CRITICAL HAPS -..-------.--------------.-- ------------------------------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES Cfable 10--2) ADJUSTED VALUE SIGHT DIST. ADJUSTMENT FINAL CRITICAL GAP M I NOF.: RIGHTS NB t.;.10 5.10 0.00 5.00 t1A..TUR LEFT!3 WB ~s. (31) ~.).. flO 0.00 5.00 t1 I NIlP LEFTS NIl 7.90 7. '30 0.00 5.00 IDENTIFYI~~ INFIlRMATION --.----------..-.- ------.---....-..- -------...-------.--.-----.--.--------.---------.------------- NAME OF TilE EAST/WEST STREET...... NYS TRUCI': ROUTE 25 [SOUND AVE] NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STPEET.... t'II()[)LE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01-1'393 ; 12-1PM SATUF:DAY IlTHER INFORMATION.... 5YR FUfURE + ALL PROJECTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 -----------------------.----------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL tL.OW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPAC ITY CAPAC ITY CAPACITY ~10VEt1ENT y(po::ph) c (po::ph) c (p':ph) 0:: (pcph) c = 0:: - y LOS p M SH R SH --------- -.-------- -------_.- ------------ ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT RIGHT 161 28 329 843 329 329 843 168 815 D A 843 MA.TCJR nTPEET t~B LEF-T I) 566 566 566 566 A IDENTIFYING INFOPt1ATTON ------------------.-. --------------.-------.-- .-.------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST I~JEST STREET...... NYS TPUCr,: POUTE 25 [SOUND AVEJ NAME or THE NDRTH/SOUTH STREET.... tHDDLE ROAD DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS..... 6-01--1'393 ; 12-1PM SATUF:DAY OTHER INF(JR~1ATTO"'.... 5YP FlJTURE + ALL PRO.TEeTS + AUG/JUN ADJUSTMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I WRITTEN COMMENTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I July 12, 1991 List of Comments Received Durinq the Public Comment Period and the Public Hearinq on the D.E.I.S. dated March 1991. for Macari at Laurel Comments from Planninq Board Review dated July 5, 1991 Comments from the Planninq Board's Environmental Consultant, Cramer. Voorhis & Associates Review dated July 5, 1991 Comments from Involved Aqencies Letter dated July 5, 1991 from Robert DeLuca, Department of Health Services, Office of Ecology Letter dated July 5, 1991 from Mohabir Persaud, Department of State Letter dated July 3, 1991 from Cynthia Sturner, Member of Conservation Advisory Council Letter dated July 9, 1991 from E. J. Rosavitch, P.E. Chief Engineer, Suffolk County Water Authority. Comments from the Public Adeline Lee June 28, 1991 Barbara Sayre June 28, 1991 Ruth Jahier July 8, 1991 North Fork Envir. Council (Sherry Johnson) JUly 5, 1991 Karen Gross July 3, 1991 TranscriPts from Public Meetinqs ,- June 24, 1991 * Draft minutes. To be presented for adoption by Planning Board on July 15, 1991. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " , ( ~::.~--=:~~... . ,..., .... ~.:...\ <of" ., ", ::... /....'1\ '''ol/''l.~ ,/..,.\.. ""'J," ':':-:':;.' ;j ....:;: l \.... ,.......A.. ::I~:; .':-<. :;::~" I ".. """, ,...~ 1 .....:;.~:. "'~Y ..' '::~l -:..",r..) ........... '-.i. I ......". :-" ::""'. _.':"'::.J',(I - '1/" ''-' ,/' . '~.,.. :', _ .1 ,. ",r "', - 'd<Y .~ Town Hall, 53095 Main R, P,O. Bo. 1179 Soulhold. New York 119' 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennell Orlowski, Jr" Chainnan George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S, McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards SC01T L. HARRIS Supervisor PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fa. (516) 765.1823 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Planning Board Comments on DEIS For Macari Subdivision July 5, 1991 SUMMARY S-2 It is believed that Kirkup Lane has a base, and is not just a dirt road. The acronym "MBS" should be defined. S-3 S-4 The last sentence in the first paragraph states that topsoil will be stockpiled for "future use". The proposed location and time of the use of the topsoil should mentioned. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION 1I-2 There is an inconsistency in the second paragraph. The projected increase in population is based on each home being occupied by 2.3 people. Yet, the proposal involves the construction of 3 and 4 bedroom homes. Unless documentation can be provided to support the 2.5 persons per house figure, the projected adult and child population should be revised upward to reflect likely occupancy of 3 and 4 bedroom homes. II-4 The projected population noted in the second paragraph should be revised to reflect the proposed construction of 3 and 4 bedroom homes. III. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING III-56 The last paragraph needs to be updated to reflect recent findings that septic syst~S and residential use of fertilizers may be an equally significant source of nitrates. III-58 The third paragraph notes that Well #S 53333 goes down 275 feet from the surface. Table 1 on page 1II-60 states that the well goes down 74 feet from the surface. Which number is correct? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " Figure 9 The map does not show clearly the location of the observation well relative to the proposed project. III-65 The second paragraph does not mention that Southold's zoning code mandates clustering in the R-80 district where the subdivision. exceeds 10 acres in area. 111-84 Reference is made to the marginal water quality in the general vicinity. Yet, there is no information given as to the quality of the water on the site. 111-88 The year,. and date of the traffic volume data is neither noted nor referenced. 111-96 The second sentence contradicts information presented on page 111-97 that inland camps were occupied during cold weather months. The first sentence of the second paragraph is contradicted by statements made on pages 111-93 and 94 that artifacts were found on the site. Also, the site sensitivity map referred to in the third paragraph is missing from Appendix B. IV. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IV-28 If the anticipated population is changed to be consistent with that which would be expected in 3 and 4 bedroom houses, then the figures for septic effluent should be adjusted accordingly. IV-30 What is the background level of nitrogen in the groundwater on the site now? IV-54 Provide documentation to support the statement that the projected population multiplier is consistent with housing units containing 3 and 4 bedrooms. IV-55 Provide documentation to support the multipliers used in second paragraph. IV~56 Given the slump in the real estate market, are stated market values of $275,000 to $300,000 reasonable? IV-58 The second paragraph refers to a~ analysis of revenue versus expenses which is not included in the report. V. MITIGATIVE MEASURES V-29 The responses to Recommendations 8, 9, 10, and 11 do not address the recommendations. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .., j " V-30 The responses to Recommendations 13 and 14 do not address the recommendations. V-47 Documentation to support the first two sentences on this page is not provided. V-56 The last sentence on this page does not take into account fact that Town Code requires permits for construction within 75' of a freshwater wetland. V-62 Documentation in support of paragraph 3 is not provided. V-64 The last sentences of paragraphs 2 and 3 contradict one another. V-65 The second paragraph in the section titled "Taxes and Fiscal Setting" contradicts the statements made on the previous page. VII. ALTERNATIVES VII-3 The No-Action alternative does not include a thorough and in-depth discussion of development of site for public water supply purposes. The value of this site for watershed protection and public water supply cannot be ignored in this environmental review, particularly given the inclusion of this property in the Central Suffolk Special Groundwater Protection Area. There is no discussion of an alternative other than the proposed layout and the standard yield layout. VII -19 The last sentence in the second paragraph refers to the Town of Brookhaven instead of Southold. VII-21 The third paragraph on this page states that the Suffolk County Department of Real Estate has indicated an interest in acquiring the property, but that the owner of the property must initiate the process. Has the owner pursued this option? If so, what has been done. If not, why? The first and second statements made in the fourth paragraph should be documented. .; VII - 2 2 The paragraph on the transfer of development rights is misleading. The Town has considered implementing such a program, but does not actually have one at this time. VII - 2 3 The Town's property records show that the applicant owns other property in the nearby vicinity to which development rights could be transferred, should the Town implement such a program. .' . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " IX. GROWTH INDUCING ASPECTS IX-l The third sentence contradicts earlier statements that the tax revenues that would be collected by this subdivision would not cover the School District's costs. X. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS X-36 The cumulative traffic impact analysis mistakenly assumes that some proposed subdivisions will have access to both Sound Avenue and State Route 25. The Planning Board's overriding concern is with the lack of discussion of the alternatives; one of which is to reserve the land for watershed protection and public water supply; another of which is to propose a tighter cluster design or a reduced density. Realistic assessment of the proposal is hampered by the lack of sufficient information about the existing water quality on the site. Further, there is no discussion as to whether the groundwater on the site would meet with the Suffolk County Department of Health's new standard for nitrate. ,; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS .,' July 5, 1991 ;1:'~. I~' :j11 R 'r-~\"7 r~ --.! H.:; .: '1' l. l:.J e; oJ d '" . , II G.} r.------..---..~.... ... .,. ! ! i' i,' 'UL .- 5 legl ;",;; v v Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Plnnning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Macari at 13urel SCfM #1000.121.4.9 Review of the Draft EIS Dear Denny: We have completed our review of the Draft Environmellwl Impc.ct Statement for the :lbove referenced project. Attached, please find a letter documenting our comments 0'1 the report. , '_~'~~.~IT~.~'~":-: ..".. ..._-.l.~~.::~'~.:-: Please review this information with the Board, and if you are in agreement. please forward same to the applicant to be addressed in the Re~pon~e to Comments, ior inclusicl1 in the Final EIS for this project. If you have any questions regarding any aspect 0: this proje.ct or our review of the Draft EIS, please do not hesitate to conluct this o[(ic". VWz C;q~~ , J:;<: 6arles J. Voorhis ~ enc: Review of Draft EIS 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD. MILLER PLAC!!. NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 -- - ..~ -. - - - - - - --. II . _ _.,. , 1_'11 _ ...... .....",. _ .. .,-," T.t.:_~ _...,.....,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., To: " Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold P!:\nning Board From: Cramer, Voorhis and Associates. Inc. Date: July 5, 1991 Re: Macari at Laurel SCTM #1000-121-4-9 Review of the Draft EIS The Draft Environmcntlll Imp~ct Statement (Dratt EIS), for the project known as Mucari at Laurel, was accepted by the Souiho!d Town Planning Board on June 4, 1991. -Die docum:lnt has been circulated to Involved agencies and parties of ira~Test. for the purpose of providing comments on the document for use by the d:lcision makin~ agency in the preparation of a Final EIS, and ultima:ely a decision on tr.e project. In adOition, a Public Hearing WolS held on the Draft EIS on June 24, 1991, in order to pruvirle op.porlunit.l for public cO!TIment on the project. A CO~~y of the Draft EIS has also been submitted to Cramer, VoorhIS and A~sociates, Inc. CVA), as consultants !O the Plannin~ Hoard, for review of the SEQR documentation. his letter constitutes the review of we Draft EIS for !\'Iacari at Llur<::1. The following comments with regard to content and ac~uracy of the dOCUI-:1enl are provided: DI'~cription .2f 1M Propoi~ Project ~ !l:11Q 11.5 The first paragraph addresses required permits. TIle applicant should determine the jurisdiction ofthe Town Trustees with rc'ci<:rd to freshwater wetl,u:us on the subj\~ct p:lrcel. Location of wetlands as determined by the Trustees is [maonum for vield determin;Jtion :lnd site design elanning. The wetlands reflected on Plnte I \vue delir:eated bl the und Use Company. The regulatory boundary of both the Town Tnlstees and the New York St<:tc Department of Environmental Com;clvaliOIl should be determined. Page II-3 indicates that, "Illdigel/olls trees and shrnbs wiil be planted along the proDoscd bIter. development roadway, witllin the cleared ponions of each huildiJliJ envelope, and elsewher~ with ill the site'~ There should be a distinction mo.d,~ between mllh~ative pl:\ntil1~ which is proposed as part of the subdivision improvements (i.e. intcr.de\'elopm.~nt roud and rechnr~~ areas), and mitigative Flanting which rn,(y or may not occur on private lots once the parc~1'i$ developed. Additiona information including species density, type and at what stage of subdiVIsion approval mitigation '. will be implemented, is necessary, Page 11-5 indicates, ':..the Applicant wishes 10 exerche his 1'I~ht tp build ill direct r':spolIsC to demand': We are in agreement tlint tl~(:r~ are a number (JI W;J)'s in whkh the parcel could b\~ developed; however, it is e.\tremely unlikely that the entir<.l par';'ll would be dcvclopcd ~t onc time. Therefore, it is requested that ~ phased devd\lpm~nt propoial ollrlinin~ the estimated stages oi development be included in the Final EIS. Given th.::: sensitivity of lJ1e Dareei nnd the importance of proper c1earin~ and drain:lgecontrol:is Olltlin,;d in the Draft tIS, it is necessarj to consider the project unplemcnl:llion $chcduk ,tS ,t mC:lns of mitigatiun. !'nce 1 or S "=' l':'t ..-1 'F - ~ .... -- - ..... ..,. -. II ~ __. ,...... ., .AI _ ... T."O ., ~ .::0- t:IIl ! t':: T ... n 1.1 T ~ _ t=:. _ -. n r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " MUCIlrl at Lou",1 Drun EIS Rc,'lcw In terms of the description of the proposcd project. this sec.tion should outline the yield determination which supports 27. rots. Review of Plate 2 finds that Lot 9 contains surf,lce water and wetlands which may cause this lot to (<Iii below the minimum area necessary in the R-80 zoning district HiQlQy.kn1 Settine : El.Illa ~ 1If.24 Pigem:24lndicatcs that the freshwater wetlands are regulated by tbe NYSDEC under Article 24. The NYSDEC regulatory boundary should be established in order to pro\'ide an accurate means of determining compliance with regulations. In addition, the regulatory jurisdiction and involvement of the Town Trustees should be determined. Biolo~ical ~: FlJuna .. ~ ITJ.36LQ JTT.42 The statement 'Tile sile for the proposed action is 1Iot cOllsidered a significant rJurceI of habitat for the Osprey'; should be referenced and supported. The document should lndicate how the Osprey was observed in connection with the site. Ospreys tend to be surface water feeders occupying habitats in proximity such food sources. The significz.nce of tbe parcel in this context should be determined. The statement in the first full par:tgraph on Page m-Jo, 'The fidd il/\'es/igatioll faill!d to fCl'MI allY endangered or threatened spedes oJ wildlife'; contradicts other information in the Draft EIS which identified the Osprey, a Threatened species. in association with the site. It should also be noted that habitat exists for a number of other Endangered species and Species or Special Concern. The second full para~raph on Page I1I--42 iodic.ttes that. 'The wildlife populatioll potcllliaI at the site is somewhat /lInited by the surroulldiflf; land lIsag/! I'..s well as recent activiri/!s 011 the site itself." This statement seems to contradict orner information in the Draft EIS which indicale~ that the parcel is an old field with forested and wetlands ueas providing diver$e habitat and "edge effect': In addition, the surroundil;~ area is prim:lrily of low int~nsit,' usage. Therefore it shou[d be indicated how these fal.iOrs limit the wildlife population potential on the site. Phvsicallmpacts: Topol!raphy P;H>e IV.:.l1Q IV...:2 This section provides a generalized discussion of topo~raphii: imp"cts. Review of Plate 1 for the proposed development areas of the site finds th'lt L.-ot 18 is mo.;t severely constrained with slopes ranging fwm 10 to 15 percent in the developmcnt area.. In addition, this lot is proximate to the eastern freshwater wctlnnds area on the site. Miti~ation meazures suggc~led in Section V require implementation, enforcement and monitorine in order to ensure that no impact occurs. Alternative mitigation such ~s :lVoid:lnce of this area is suggested. Biolo~i.Ql Jmpacts :: E!.Qra . ~ TV-Ii ill lY:8. The slle contains significant prime iarmland as outlined on Pages 1IJ-12 ancflTl: 13. The loss of this farmland is regarded as an irrcv'~rsiblc impact, whieh :Jlcruld be recognized as such. This is of course baianced with other issues ~uch as potentia! for lower nitroL;cn in re("har~e associated with cessation of farming. v The regulatory wetlands boundary must be establi~.hed bcfor~ conclusions reoarding wetlands impacts Tr1:J.Y be reached. LOI 1~ f:.:lJs withi!l 75 f.:et of the su\;sestcd ~...etl,i:ld5 boundary, and contains steep slopes proxllnatc to thIS wetlands. Potcilllal for Impact of development of this lot upon wetlands is considered high. ..~~ ;'~ "';;~ -=.~, 1IJ. CRAMER, V I' R~. ~'SOCrATES ENVIRONMENT '~f-!:!. '~i'~ .\\~ G CONSULTANTS P~t:e 2 of 5 +oa,~ . .... -=--.---:<<... - 41: . I' , _ _... " , _"I n , -. -=- ~ . ~ T ....n.oJ t";-A --.n... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , , M.,"rl"l Lau....1 Dral't EIS Rev Ie.. , Biolo~ic:l1 Impacts.: f:ltlna .. '~ IV-8 In lY:1.a The Avian Species impact table be~innin~ on Page lV.ll,lndicates that the proposed project willlldversely affect gro.ssland species inciuding w:\rblers and sparrows, including loss of potential habitat for two Species of Special Concern, the grasshooper and Vesoer Soarrows. The fact that the prol'osecf project will alter 44 percent of the exi5tin~ Old Fiefd haoitat, impacting those species which rely on this habitat, should be further Identified as an impact of the proposed project. . Lot 18 contains forest, old field and provides an ecotone between these habitats. In addition, this lot is constrained by slopes. TIle preservation of h:lbitat on site could be enhanced if this lot were to be relocated. ~droloeic Impacts: Groundwater filM rV.31 T e computations ior Turf fertilizer appear to be iow. The Draft EIS uses 25 Ibs,jlS,OOO squore feet, or 1.71hs./1,OOO square feet. Standard references induding the 208 study and the Non-Point Source Management Handbook, indicat~ that non~:ll turf fertilization ra.tes are in the range of2.0 to 2.5 Ibs./l,OOO square feet. Accurate and realistic turf futilization rates should be used in th-z simUlation of nitrogen in recharge for the proposed project, cumulative impact evaluations and alternatives. It is acknowledged that lower Tates may be achievable if a fertilizer management plan is implemented on tll.: site. References including, Land Use ;l,nu Groundw:ltcr QU:1!ity in the Pine Barrens of Southamp:on (Hughes and Porter, 1983), and BURES. A Simulation of the Nitrogen Iml'act of Residential Development on GiOunuw:iter (Hu!;hes alOJ Pacenka. 1985), indicate a mtrogen in wastewater value of 10 los.jperselniday. The Draft EIS a'poears to utilize a lesser figure in computations contained Oll Page IV.34, and in ajtel'riatlv;~s and cumulative impact evaluations. Accurate and realistic nitrogen in sanitary w;.ste v:dues should be used in the simulation of nitrogen in rechar:;e. Mitigations Measures. Topogral1hy Pace V.S Page V.5 indicates that, ':..in order 10 limif much oj fl:e pOfmria/ re'grading, the /lousing units will be located withill rhe most leve/ portions of the site (old field)." As previously indicted, !i~ili,ng potential grading on Lot 18 is difficult due to 10 to 15 percent slopes within the bUllulng envelop. 11.itif,':Ition Measures:.ElQm l.'f1'?~ V.19 The discussion regarding the lock of potemiaJ for the rare plant speci\~s Cut-leaved Evening- primrose (Oenoth.~ra laciniatli) and Dwarr Plantain (Plantago p\lsil1a) contained on P<lg'~s V-IS and"V.19, appears to be un~lIpported due 10 the doc\!mented fact that these speci~s prefer dry fields and c1eari:1gs with sandy soil:; as indicated in the Drait EIS. The Draft EIS should indicate whut efforts were made to identify the presence Or absence of these species on the site. ,; Mitir?tiOl) Measur~..s: Fresnw'1ler lY!:.tl;md.s Paoe Y:l.2lQ \'.? \ Si~n1tican( discus$ion is provid.ed reganJing the UiiC of soil stabilization techniaues to mlilimiz~ pOt~l1tilll impact to the frl~shwat(;r wetlands ft(!l1~ adj:lc,~nt de~'e]opm'ent areas. These mitigation measures cause dfort to be execndcd IlIlmpl"mer.l:ltlon, enforcement nnd !I10nit~rin,g in order to al!proach some succ:ss ~~ mi,tigation. ,,\voidaryl7e,of steep slope areas In proXlmlt}' to wetlands IS recommended as mlllgatwn .\S pr~vlOu~,ly Indlc:lted, CRAMER, v~"R'\ J~\~OCIATES ENVIRONMENT~~~~~G CONSULTANTS Pace 3 or S - n . ,..., or... -. ..... _ << ... _ __.. I .......,...... F' . _ ......... ,_ .....-.-... . "'_" . , ~~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .' " MacarI at Laurel Drun EIS Review " Mitieation Measures: Fauna ~ V.?11Q V.J 1 The fifteen (15) recommendations excerpted from Robbins, 1979 are valuable tools toward retaining habitat viability. It is suggested that Lot 18 be relocated in order to include the area in the contiguous open space as a means of better confonr.ing to these recommendations. This h:ls the benefit of increasing the buff~r from the eastern wetlands feature, reducing impact to steep slope areas. providing additional old field and forest h:lbitat (with associated ecotones), and proviumg a wider linkage through the LILCO easement to open space lands to the south. ~iti~atiQ!J Mea~l1res: Potahl~ W::\ter ~ ~ V-'iO 1!l y.'i~ Page V.50 indicates that water <;uality within the area is within "acceptable ranges'~ howevcr, Page 1II.61 indicates that certain pesticijcs exceed allowable limits. This should be ci:lriiicd, The fact that total nitrogen in groundwater is 10 mg/l and aldicarbs and carbofur:m exceed the limit indicates that water treatment will almest certainly be required. Treatment techniques are outlined in the Draft EIS: however, the Final ETS sliouJd outline the approval process for water source of the Suffolk County D~partment of H~alth Services und~r Article 4 oC the Sanitary Code. Miti~atiol1 Measures: Cultural R,~s(l1lr"'~ J:J!g.c. V-~l) lQ V-1'l1 The Archaeological Invc~tifllltion inc1uded in ApRcndL': B indic:t,es that .3C oi 211 shovei probes (14 percent) yieldeo prehistoric :lilifacts. TIle report concludes that there are, ''[wo limited areas of potentially intact prehistoric sedimems... ~ and soes on to recommend that "Further limitea subsurface excal'mion jn order to fully expose specific areas of sedimeflts beiol'J the existing ploll! zone IS Ileed~d ;0 defin'! the limits of the site. "The lvritigation Measures section Page Y-61 outJjne~ three possible mitication measures for this documented sensith'ity: 'The site layout can toe modifh'd sl/eTt that those areas ot'sl:1LSitil'il)' would be preserved as "open space ': Oil lots where 01/(" pOr/jolls cOlllain archaeological sensitivity, stricl building envelope coventlllfS can be imposed ill order to preserve thi! sensitive areas. Finally, plzysical excavation of the sensitive material can remove the archac.'logiml sensitivity from tile site, gainin$ tlte knowledge of past occupancy in tlte orocess': Funher mitigation of prehistoric resources IS warranted as indicated in the Drait E1s. 111e professiol1:\1 archaeologist should COnt:!C! the New York State Office of Parks Recreation <lnd Historic Prcserv:llion (OPRHP) 10 determine the appropriate and acceptable mcth,)d of mitigation in fulfillment ot tht Slate Historic Preservation Act and rninimizatiO!l of impacts for the purpose of the State Environmental Quality Review Act. If options eXlst based Llpon conlact with the State, tb Applicant should assist in determininj; the appropriate mitigation, as the alternatives lTIay affect yield, confi~uration, marketability, project schedulieg and expenditures. The Final EIS should contam documentation of contact with OPRHP and should outline an adequate means of mitigation of impact upon prehistoric resources. ." . MiliygtioQ \fl'asures: M:lIlituik Schon] [lJs1lli:1 Pa(!l~ V.r:;~ lQ YoM The raft EIS indicates tha: revenue generated from the project is no sufficient to dir.::ct[y offset the cost to educate a child, stating that other sources 01 income may be available to offset this deficit thereby minimizing the impact. Cont.:ct should b~ made with the Sc;,ool District to determine the :Jbility 10 accommodate ll.ddi:ional ~ch()ol aged children. Page 4 or 5 ~o...... 'w:_~____ ~ -. ,. ..-........ .-...- ..... - -. -.. "-" . - ~~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " MUCllrl at laurtl Dnlll tIS R~vlcw. Unavoidabl~ Adver~ FnvironmeDllll Jmpac.ts . " ..~ rum VT-6 This section should make note oJ the pot~nllal for lrCcvcr51blc 1(ls. ot prehlstoClc resources not currently identified on the project sitc. Alternatives 12 1M PropQRQ Action ~ VlT.l1Q VTT-14 The Applicant should consider a modified cluster involving 35.000 to 40,000 square foot lots, in order to avoid steep slope areas on Lot 18, ma.ximizc wetlands setbacks, preserve additional forest, old field and edges, e.~;nnd open space linkages, and possibly avoid are:lS oC documented prehistoric r~sources. This alternative would fulfill the slated intention of the applicant and further minimize potential significant environmental impacts on this sensitive site. The density of the Yield Alternative should be adjusted :IS necessary depending upon the final feasible yield determination of the Planning Board. Discussions and computations in the Alternative anllys!s should be udjusted to retlect proper turf fertilization rates :md sewage nitfl)gen values. The Land Acquisition Potential alternative should be updated to reflect the status of potential County acquisition. The project site doe~ meet many of the crit(!ria generally applied to sensitive puree Is worthy .)[ acquisition as olJtlincd on Pages VII.22 :0 VII-2'1 of the Draft EIS. Ctlmlllativ~ m ~~ X:.11a X..t5 One of the wil life im;.nlCtS associ,lted with the ,Macari at Laurel project is the loss of 44 pc.rcent pC old fiel~ hab}tat pr.esent on the sit.:', wit~ :lss~ciate~ stress on species ocCupri~lg . thiS habllat potentially mcludll1g two sparrow Specl<es 01 SpeCIal Concern. The potenllal at Ihis impact to be magnified by cumulative development pressures in the vicinity oi Laurel Lake should be explored. If this impoct appears to be significant, mitiention measures and/or performance sta.ldards shouid be established to apply to projects which arc proposed within the study area. The United States Dept. of the Interior, N~tional Wetlands Inventory and the NYS proposed Freshwater Wetlands 1'faps identify surface water Jnd wetland f~atures within the study area exclusive of Laurel Luke and the wetlands associated with the site. The Final EIS shvuld explorc the cumulative impact of isolating these h:lbirats by "is/iJIlIis" of development. with proposed measures to link and protecl these featurc~ and the cxchanre of wildlife and resources within the general Laurel Lake area. '" Tne subject project along with the P~conic Home,S, heaDY and Jo.hn McFeely proj.~cts all front on Laurel Lake. The Impact 01 the changc Inland use density, open space valU<l and configuration. and recreational utilization of the lake sheuld be discussed in more detail ~s related specifically to Laurel Lake. Appropriate limit:llions :In<f restrictions and desh'n considerations should be outlined in more detail. '" '" '" '" '" Thank you for the opportunity to provide t/:e Town of SlJutho!d P!:lnning Beard with comments on the Draft Euvlronmentallrnpact St:llement for 1\1acari at w.urcl. l'lease do nOt hesitate 10 call if there arc any qup.slions conC(~rnin8 this review. C<~j;\~ IA~ CRAMER, V : AHI.' \ SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT' ';." .: '1 ~ .' ~G CONSULTANTS PlICCS ofS ,n ..-:f -r. '" -::. 0. -w: 'S H ";!I:t "!r........ .:) 0,.., ' .........1 ~ ,-. "=I A ! ~ T ...n... T':_C> _..,.....r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I "_".. 3 . COUNTY OF SUFFOLK " .. "''':''7'.. ."".~......~ l....:~~\lJtil.. .~~ '.' .. 'I ".~ 'W' \<,~~.:~ ..~.:~ PATRICK G. HALPIN. SUFFOLK COUNry E:XE:CUTIVIl: OEPARTMENT OF HEAI.TH seRVICES OAVIO HARRIS. M.O.. M.P.H. COMMI$$IONC" 1uly 5,1991 Dennen Orlowski, Ir" Chaum3l1 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 SOUdlllld, New York 11971 RE: Subdivisiun of Jt.lscpb Macari ;.1 L:olurel SCDHS Ref # 88-620, Macari-Luurel SCTM II 1000-121-4-9 Dear lvlr, Orlowski: The Suffolk COUnty Depactmenr of Health Se.cvic.::; (SCDHS) hilS reviewed Ihe above:- refcrenced Draft Ellvuonmelllal Impact Statement (DE1S). In general, we filld the documer:t acequate with respcctto its scope. Based on our review, however, we believe the document shuuld be amended to provide additional information regarding altern:llive developmclll designs, mitigation measures, fre~hwater wetl3l1ds infolln:llion, and cumulative impacts ,)n Laurel Lake. Also, it is our undemmdi.l1g that funding for public acquisition of the subject parcel has been approved by Suffolk County as pan of the Suffolk County Drinking Water PfOtection Program (ResolUlion # 717-1990). We beli"ve the availaIJility of acqui~ition funds should be an i.mpon:ull consideration ll1thc review of ,Jtematives to this action and should, therefore, be reflected in the document's di5Cuszion of th'~ public acquisition 3ltclnative. We wish to point out that we have no record of positive de~acation for the subject proposal which :lppears to have b,~en scgmcllI,:J [ruIH tho$c a(;tion:; otig[nally inclu,kJ as pan of the Laurel Lake GElS declaration of significance. We n:colTul1end that the Doard consider a recision, or revision of the original positive declaration for the Laurel Lake GElS and the preparation of a positive declararion spcciti(;.llly addressing the lv1:lcari proposal. We belie,": the positive declar:ltion also should discuss rhe Co""r,n ec...rCR ItI,(CA,..C"O. f\j.T. t Il~OI..3'" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I leiter to BeMett Orlowski July 5, 1991 Page 2 " ,. reasons for segmenting the subjec.:t aClion [r"m Ihe originalOEIS declaration. It is our opiniun, th:ltthis procedur;u clarification is impOl"liUllto the compliance requuements of SEQRA. Details of our ;:ommems are provided below. I. Sanitary Code: 1. Our agency received an application for subdivision approval pursuant to the :equuements of AJ.lic1e VI of the Suffolk Count)' Sanitary Code (SeSC) in August of 1988. It appe:ll'S that tbe development can confonn to the unit density requirements of Article VI, which require a minimum Jot yield of 20,000 square feet per lot in Hydrogeologic Zone IV, Equivalent lot }'ield refers to gross laud area minus the area of roads, recharge basins, and other improvements which may be necessary to the development of the site. 2. It is impoa:uu to point outth:lt Ollr agency provides for "clustered realry subdivisions ... which consist of one or more relatively uudersized parcels, designed in such :\ manner as to allow a subst:Ulli:ll uni.mprov'~d pOll ion of the U':lctto stiUld open and uninhabircd." (SCSC; Anic:1e \11, 760-601(a)) 3. Wh~re clustered s\lbdivisions :Ire sc(Ved by priv:lte W:ller supply systems, lot sizes may be reduced to a minirm.:m lot size of 20,000 sq ft ':U1J confolln to the water facilities requi.l:cmcnts of Arlicle VI. [SeSe; Article VI, 760-608(1)(e)] 4. In Hydrogeohlgic Z"ne IV, clustered ,:'c:llly subdil"isions must conform to a population (kmiry equivalenl of:. Slo1ndald n:,id~lIlial whdi'lisioCl wherein all parcels consist of an area of at least 20,000 square fect. S. The subject propo$:Il was recently reviewed by our :lgency's Bureau of Wastew:lter Management. As l\ result of this re'dew, it has been d<:temlined that well data provided to our agency in 1989 h:\s expired, and thaI 3 wells will have to be resarnpled prior to any fin:l1 detennination by SCDHS p~{laining to the suitability of the proposed water supply. 6. In addition to well data, our agent:y is awaiting the following additional information from the applicant prior to continuing ils review of this proposal. - Public Waler cost letter from the 10c:,1 water district - Test hole/test weU locations and d<:tails.. - Neighboring wetllocations wilhinl50 ft of property lines - Werlands cktenl1ill.lljon letler liulll NYSDEC - SEQRA determination flOm Town . Applic:lblc well COVen:lnlS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Lener to Bermelt Orlowski July 5,1991 Page 3 " 7. The applicant must comply with the requirements of the SCSC and all relevant cl>l1struction st:lnclards for WJler supply and sewage dispus,1l systems. D<:sign and flow specifications, subsulface soil conditions, and complete site plan details are considered fully during the SCDHS review of the application. . 8. SCm-IS maintoililS jurisdiction over the .final location of sewage disposal and water supply sYStems. 11le :Ipplic:lnt, therefore, should not undtata.ke the construction of either system without Health Dep:utment approval. II. Mitigation Measures: 1. We rc:conunend that conditions to be placed on dedicated open space within the subdivision be clearly explained in the document. We encoumge the Town to requite that dedic:ned open space be preserved in its nalural State and prot.::cted from any future clearing, construction, or de ve1opm:nt. We arc p:uticularly concerned with d~dicilted open space adj:lcent to Laurel L::.ke. \Ve believe this area has significant potential for incre::sed human lIse and disturbance afler site development. and feel strougly Ihal the appropriate protection of this ar<:a should be r.Jlly defined in the DEIS. Thus, we recommend th;lt the docutnem address any future development plat.s incldding parking, d'Jck f;lcilities. boat houses, or any acc.:ss cl<:aring. Although we have no objection to lhe provision of appropriate access in this area, we believe srrongly, that accc:s Inust be carefully planned!o avoid disturbance of Ihe sitc's freshwater wetland; o.nd Llure1 L:ke . We do not believe 111:.tlhis :\rea is an appropriate locatioll for boat storage "r parking facilities and recommend r..'1at the Town examine the potemiallong-tenn u.~e of this ponioll of the site 1'1 ior to any approval of the proposed pl:ln. Conditions of approval should cbuly ddine the allow;lble use of Ihis area ur.d provide thc appropriate coven:ulls to assure ilS protection for the future. 2. We Suppotlthe proposed aCI;On'$ incorporalion of recharge areas which are designed to minimize site excavmioll and S!n1ClUrJ.! modification. We would reconunend, however, thot design details inc1l!ding lOlldscoping and crosioll measures (thrust blocks. heodwaU details, etc.) be provided for review. ,_ 3. The document indi;::\les Ula: the p:opvsed action will incorporate the use of im!igen,-,us woody species for replanting within li ";t.rategic repLulting schedule". We SUppOI1 the use of nOlive plantings. auu request Ihat addir10naJ iJ1fllfll1atiou describiug proposed I:Uldscaping species ond uleir r~p1nntil1g schedule b~ Ulcolporated in the dOCUll~enl. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , Leiter to BelUlelt Orlowski July 5.1991 Pase 4 " 111. Freshwater Wdlilnds and Surface Wntcl's: 1. Based on the Tentative Freshwater Wedn11ds Regulatory lYf3ps for Suffolk County, it appears St:Jte-cegulated freshwater wetlands (l'vIT-2 lind l'vIT-22) are located on this site. As indicated in the document (p. II-I), the subject proposal will be nff~cted bi' Aniele 24 of ihe New York St"te EnvironOlemal ConselVation Law (Freshwater Wetlands). We recolcunend that wI freshwater wetlands buundary delineations be approved by the NYSDEC and indicated as such on the project sUlVey. 111 addition, we support full protection of all regulated freshwater wetlands and their 3djacent areas on this site. 2. We note that the document's summary or potential cumulative impacts on recreation (p. X- 40) does not include discussion of in<;reased demand 011 narural resources such as L3urel Lake. L3urd Lake provides a valuable fl'eshwater fishing opponunity accessible to the public through the NYSDEC access poi.nt 3long the Laurel Lake's south shore. Anemion 10 this public resource is i.ml'onam in the considerlltion of the subject and nearby developments which can pl.':ce additional pre~sure on the us~ and enjoyment of this passive recreational resource. IV. Alternatives: 1. As st;lled previously, it ~ our understlJtding that funding for public acquisition of the subject purcel has been approved by Suffolk County. We support public acquisition for preservatioll as a use which will provide the bestlong-tenn protection of this site's natural rcsourccs. It is imponalll to consider Ihis p.1rcel's location whhu1 a core watershed arl."a i.n the Town, and the neurby location of Laurel Lal(e. Full site acquisitioll will preserve this parcel in its undevcl\lpcd state and provide for long- term groundwater, wiI.Uife and open sp~ce resources protection without the requircmcm of increased public services (notably; lllcreased education Cll,;ts which are outlined in the d<)culIlcm). We believe ful1her altentiOl\ to this :thclIlalh'e is W.lrranteu by the approval of funding, and enCOUrl\ge the Town to cardulIy consider public acquisition as a reasorlllblc alternative. 2. Absent, the acquisirion alternative, we believe a more tightly. clustered subdivision design ClUl afford beller protection of this site's wildlife habitat, Sleep slopes, freshw"ter wetlands, and visual :Iesthetics than that which is proviJed by the .\pplil.:ant's clusl~red subdivision design. The clustered subdivision map included illthe docutTIt:nt was IIsefulto our review. Based on otlr evaluation, we believe that with Ill.inunum overall modification, a significantly .--.------ _.-.-- _.~-.._-._-~- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . Leiter to BCMCll Orlowski luly 5, 1991 Page 5 greater degree of contiguous opcn space, wildJife hab~tal, and natural groundwater recharge area can be preserved. . We have prep:ited a sketch plan incorporating the following design modifications, which is enclosed for the Town's consideratiOll. . Overall lot size l'eductions averaging approximately 30,000 to 35,000 sq ft (no lots are less than 30,000 sq ft) . LOIS 13,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, & 19 :ite relocated within existing development areas . TIle separation dist:lllce betweell the closest residential development and laurel Lake is increased by approllimately 200 fcct . The separation disl:lllCe between residential development and the sile's freshwater pond will be increased by approximately 200 feet . Approximately 8 additional acres :ite provided within the site's SOuthwestern open space area . Open srac~ rcconfigur;).civn will create :1l1 open space preserve of approximately 26 cOl\lig\lolls acres along the pmpenies weslern bound.lI)' acres (as proposed, southwcstern open space is comained within two discontinuou.l parcels of appIoAim~tely 9 ~Cl':s each) . lots 18 :lI1d 19 are reloc:m:d from within Ih~ adjacent area of the site's freshwater pond .6 additionallulS will have open space frontage or views . 1 flag lot (with access betwe:o lots 24 & 25) will be required in the vicinity of lhe northern "drainage area" . All steep slopes ""d wellands will be protel:tc:d . All views from Sound AI'enue will be preserved . The proposed illlerconnectini; roadway network is retained . Slight relocalilm of lhe nonhern drainage area will be necessary to accollUnOd.lle one residential lot We believe lhl': sel1sitivity of this site is well documented by its proposed public acquisition, its location within a core w:\lershed protection area, .\I1d its proximity to Laurel Lake. We believe, therefore, that all efforts must be employed to assure the full protection of this site's many natural resources through the review alternative development designs which minimize the potential negative ellviromnental effects of this action. V. Summary IInd CunclusioM: " Based on our review of the DEIS, we find that there are outstanding issues which are nO! fully nlldresscd in the doeul1lclll. We request, therefore, that an addcndum to the DE IS bc prepared in response to tlle Slated concems of our agency. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " Leller to BelUlell Orlowski 1uly 5,1991 Page 6 .' We appreciate the opportunity 10 revi~w this proposal.. Should YOUI have any questions or rc,:!uirc additional infonnaliQII. plc;\s.: feel free 10 conr3clti~e Office of Ecology at 548-3060. Sincerely. ~ ~.J).z.. Robert S. DeLuca Biologist Office of Ecology cc: Vito Minei, f.E. Louise Harrison Slephen Costa, P.E. [1rallk Panek, NYSDEC Stephen Sanford, NYSDEC Roben Green, NYSDEC enclosure ,- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .' 4 " STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALBANY. N.Y. 12231-0001 CAll.. S, SHAFFER SECREtARY OF STATE July 5, 1991 Mr. Bennett orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 southold, NY 11971 .____._ -:-0. .. I : ~ . ~ .-- - ., I" '0" vji_ 5 ',:2; ,...~...-. . .......---- - Attn: Mellissa Spiro Re: S-91-012 Draft Environmental Impact statement Macari at Laurel Subdivision Town of Southold Dear Mr. Orlowski: Thank you for allowing us to Environmental Impact Statement subdivision of Macari at Laurel, review and comment on the Draft (DEIS) for the proposed major Town of Southold, New York. According to 6 NYCRR 617.9(e) of the regulations which implament the state Envi.ronmental Quality Review Act (SEQAA), the uctions of involved state agencies occurring in or affecting the State's Coastal .:ire,,,, must be consistent with New York State's Coastal Policies. Based on our review of the DEIS, the Division of Coastal Resources and l-lut..rfront Revitaliz<<tion of the Departme.nt of St::lte submits the following comments. ". ThQ DEIS should contain a section which identifies the State's coastal policies which are. affected by the proposed action. It should address each policy so as to indicate how the proposed action is consistent or can be made to be consi~tent with the ztate's coastal policies. Policy #5 - This coastal policy states that new development should be encouraged to locate in areas where there are adequate public services I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. July 5, 1991 Page 2 " and facilities essential to such development. In this regard, it will be prudent for the applicilnt to further explore the options of re-locating the development in areas that are more conducive to such actions. The concept of the Tr;msfer of Development Rights (TOR), even though, the applicant or one of his colleagues does not singly own other property in the school district or in the Town of Southold should be further investigated. The legal ramifications in attempting to apply TOR to jointly held properties may be enormous, but the preservation of this sensitive tract of prime water-shed lands, designated ilS potential "open space" should be given the greatest consideration. This parcel of land' is invaluable in its potential con~ribution for the protection, preservation and enhilnccment of the ground and Surfilce water quality in the area. In order to preserve the environmental values of the subject parcel, the acqui!lition option that is available through the SUffolk County Department of Real Estate should be further explored. This may involve an offer by the applicant to SUffolk County to sell the property at a free marlcet price. Depending upon the response of Suffolk County I other measures may be perused to preserve the benefits that aCcrue in keeping this parcel in its present state. Policy #14 states that activities and development shall be undertaken so that there will be no measurable increase in erosion at the site of such <.ctivities or development, or at other locations. The DEIS indicatas that re-grading will cause slopes to be disturbed and vegetation to be stripped from the area thus increasing the potential for erosion and sedimentation within and without the parcel. The DEI~ does explore in enough depth, alternatives to the grading, cutting and filling and the minimum amount of grading that would be necessary in-order to achieve the project .ends. What is the least amount of gl:"ading that would be rQq'il1red to accomplish the project goals? ~imilarly, the amount of impervious surfaces that will be created from rOOf-tops, driVcn"ays, and t~e road~{ay which will increase surf~ce runoff and hence erOSlon and sedimentation should be analyzed in gr0at(~:c detail to determine if and where impervious surfaces c~n be reduced or eliminated. Is it I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , Bennett Orlowski, Jr. July 5, 1991 Page 3 " Ii absolutely necessary that driveways be,',constructed of impervious materials or can pervious or semi-pervious ones can be substituted? An analysis of this component can reduce the amount of' impervious surfaces and hence the potential for increased erosion and sedimentation. We would lilte to commend the preparers of the DEIS in the manner in which they addressed t,he many and varied issues and hope that our comments will be helpful in the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Statement. (i:c;2~~~P~. ~, 'Mohabir Persaud Coastal Resources Technical Specialist MP/jtb ," TOTHL P,Ool I;. I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5 -1"u~nt..C .P~ //1 :.. vS ..1..../ .~. 1 ~~Jl TO: Senelt Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman Southold Planning Soard "' , FROM: Cynthia Sturner, Member (;.<1- Conservation Advisory Council RE: DEIS for Macari at Laurel SCTM# 1000-121-4-9 We have reviewed the DEIS for Macari at Laurel Lake and have a couple of concerns on the information presented therein. We have narrowed our concerns to groundwater protection and wetland protection. The project falls within an core watershed area designed by the County as a Special Groundwater Protection Area, and the town has also given this area a Watershed Protection Zone designation. Information about what the recommendations of the County and the town are as to how to best manage this area are not included in the DEIS and therefore an accurate determination of the impacts from the proposed development of this core watershed area is vague and inconclusive. We believe more information on this is needed before making a determination. We believe that the plan alternatives of this proposed development could be expanded to include a tighter cluster of this development in order to achieve the following purposes: eliminate more impervious surfaces and therefore minimize road runoff, consolidate the open space proposed into a bigger block, leaving as open space the areas that are the most environmentally sensitive in terms of groundwater recharge and wetlands protection. While we commend the applicant for leaving a 100' buffer between development and wetlands we would like to know if the drainage pattern of the wetlands at the site will be disturbed with the proposed development. We have not found this answer in the DEIS. Since the wetlands contain endangered plant species. we would like to see if there is any possibility of further protecting the ponds by shifting development as far away as possible from them. We believe a tighter cluster away from these areas would achieve this. We also would like to take the applicant up on his offer to construct leaching pools for each catch basin in order to prevent any potential overland flow encroachment into the freshwater wetlands. IV T I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Discharge from septic systems in a core watershed area is also a concern. The section on the DEIS describing the impacts associated with effluent discharga seems to indicate their will be impacts that could not be mitigated appropriately. Therefore we would suggest that a groundwater monitoring program to provida early indication of water quality problems should be incorporated into the plan. Thank you for your attention to our concerns. ;. , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~...;o'I'" , ~?~"\> l'("j<" -' ,-,J '~t>c . ...'..>. ~..--<. ~~i't"l"~. ~",..;,~t;'-J.1-'"'' ,tt~;:~)" 1\;~~i:!~w.;~lm::':~i !:i.~!~~~;.j~;~Y.~~i;~.:,:" I~ ',.".... i' f". """"""'.'.." '''';''''.". ,"'r>r'-S-"~ _f~:\'~~' l;,<-'....;t-,fL'l'i"':::i'l i,l: "-"",,, .c,. ',. '.r"" ,.>C,. i1.-.~~","'~~. ."lj~", ~ -I~,,t~; ,..,jl.,..~., "".....1"..'.'..,-,.. r .....""." '~.{;'-,......." ";I~';'.<"-.'!I.;-"~~~'~".P'.:_..hll'~:'f:~..~" f '~\~(! '. ~li.;:~'~~.l':~;." <;;~-~-'(f~;;'i;~j.!..;.!1.~l,;~l:'"1 1,,''', t~ii'l"~ '~"''''I' ~',,,,...,. '11"..... t\, .. .1'" ','il;l.-f'X"!r,"l'f'j j.p . 'J: l . , ,~;.{y;:,~~~ilf;' 6 SUFFOLll{ COUNTY 'WATER AVTHORrry Edward J. Rosavltch. P.E. Chi.' Enginesr Administrative OfIjce~: 4060 Sunrise H,ghway. O..kdale, NY 11769.0901 (516) 563.0202 Fax No.: (516) 589.5277 July 9, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Souehold, New York 11971 Re: Macari ae Laurel Draft Environmental I~pact Statement Dear Mr. Orlowski: The Suffolk County Water Authority has =eviewed the DEIS for ehe proposed Macari at Laurel subdivision and offers the following comments for your consideration. In general, the Authority hus no objection to residential subdivisions on two acre (R-80) parcels. However, the cluster proposal shown on Plate 1, \vhich would allolv for 27 units on 40,000 sq. ft. (min) loes and maintain approximately 33.1 acres of open space, appears to be a better opportunity for both the Authority and the Town. The Town will gain by the permanent dedication of open space and the Authority would like to be deeded a parcel large enough for the future construction of a well field. An appropriate parcel for the Authority, based on land surface elevations and the required sanitary protection radius; would require the relocation of the drainage area out of the open space in the northwest corner of the property (Se.e enclosed copy of portion of Plate 1). .~.. .' The Suffolk County Water Authority has been considering the aquisition of watershed property around Laurel Lake since 1989. In October and November of that year, the Authority had two appraisals done of the A. T. Holding Co. property referred (0 on page 1-4 of the DEIS. It is suggested that municipal aquisition of property available in thiu area would be an investment in both the water supply and the quali,y of life. JUL I 2 ;S9~ I.~ .. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The area in question sita almost directly on top of the regional groundwater divide and has a eurrent water table 'elevation of approximately 6 feet ahove sea level (DEIS page III-50). This makes the site, and any other sites nearby, a candidate for aquisition as watershed property and a potential source of supply for the Mattituck area. . If you have any questions, please advise. Very truly yours, I)~'l..-:ib/ E.J. Rosavitch, P.E. Chief Engineer EJR:MM cc: Hr. Mr. Mr. M. A. LoGrande W. C. Hazlitt_^~ S. R. Dassler':l"'" 'I" , 2< ",UL ',.. .~. '-~.... _. .. -" , .. ". .. I I .' ~A~-' ~5-, 19 q I 7 '.J ' /-:w /))1' G:. C a....~~ I . S'..LJ)-~.:~~Uc-.-1. I cp12-W\ (p ~~.v.,,,~(pnk ,-0 ~-.Q ~ (1 Cl 'CJ' ' .._CLLLJik: "',J~ . .. J JA()AX. ~&. Cl-'.fi jitV"t. .%(,,, 5J 6 ~' . Jl- ./.+ ';"rr\.~ ~ w.d -Mo. fik- ~ ""fA . ~ ~ -B-e-~ ~CL ::tAiif Yk ~M2+- I : A rJ' ~.CAI!Jl1,,~~ " ./'-"#- -4- ~ I') ,1 . j ~ A~ 7D -W'" 1'iZD-'!cJu- j,bJk 0-CCfUL . Vfh~Il-~ ~ (, ~t:/~ ~ ~ In (2f ct- . Jdk ~rj' Gf-tt'wti- ft",~if" I ilaf.4 . ~o.-n~ (!Pt.-ul!.. ~ ';"1- (L 4Gr- 8"lJ1-~ , . vri(; i~'cJ M- iJ4,.j::m;f- -u- D- ~ r . of JYk ~4:-b -& Ak~ ,J P <f#~'<' . J ~..oJf)r ~ 072at?, i) ~0-4- I ~/L-m c&~oJJ-& _ 1it>-Cv ~+ yJ-V'-d4- ~ aT . I : -ilk cr~ fl- Ii 711 ~~"-,,,,--t;':(f ,,;~ I. ~VJ tia1JJ, w.oJ ' 111 Olf!:a)u, __u),~'u,%L Jk.. /,, "CL'~ft<(f ;t/J.v. \f"'L 'IfO-Cc . fl c2v /VL&{ ~ *4 rf()/,-L-, ~::tfjp. iJ1~ I ~~n-CX- \!"'L. -tik ~ ~ ~<!-- PeLt-eO T ~ -:0'-7"--- .-.-..--- I ., U. ./.V1. OVVL CL?1 cL ....L/) (). J /J /'J ro. . r:rJ2. ...J.t,~aL Q.,-I/1.ClL J.dUr{ri~ .' :-r I I ((' _Cr fJ!~ Q.McL/VV~aJJ '-zt ~-e~JY2 I). ~Oi{P')) I --:,~, I .--l/-k. c.~ .) -lO"YC. /7).....e..U(, r ' "7 I Ij1D-Q.CVu.., CQA.'L /1.'1~'LC>W2- A' k rxv f) I) f)--bu,. (j ., - L-V <...d-: G!- oikl.- I & fi'V~oJ) ~ 7:.-:t - ~, ~ ~ cuT ~V/l LA-e.t? I- t '. J! .~ () ~ t .-.-.Q .A . /J . I ) ~~ ~ '>L (F'-'-"'-""? "f2it4, , () -f-f>. " () -A- t -UJ 11. . I 7 ~ (j"-'>--la ]T --4-...AJ/02- ~el.a.t r:~ " -U) , ' -J- /) ,) ) I frl ~ ~~t f. lcJ/J"""11hV?- ,J}urmeWU"""'-'L- I .M-~ ~ ~w- 't ~.J!afk.. TA ldk. I .v-~ flOffiL .Jh.t- ~Q.- af ~? ~[) I ~ N c~~,rt;.1f1~ . M<rP- ~.;:~~~..~ ~":~ I I J)vL. e<~tjrvn-ra.J.;;J! "'-"(fed "tvl {)<AI>l"'''''' I J..!-oQ.. ...vJ,a:t &Dt~ yf/f.;" t.f}lau;v..{~ r~cl I ,.p _ P:1.e0t~(ftj.. Gt. 0ffA.... ~?J ' I >>f.k:- C r V, v " v ()' , . f dl- ~-",,~(J ,.J>eo.-;&""1- , )I {""Ii..: Llko1 I . . , ~ -!:W c1we~~uQr2- ~ />.ciLu-'L c~Q(.. ~ I . . ,',7-;;,.u r) .17 il~M' --1..P/~v- ,Y-Ct/'/"ZQ' / . . n I .9 ~ 1~ 1:#..-. (j.u71 ..<P'.d&L. I -mi~k~~ ~~: S"'",4r;1 _. "u__, ___~~ 0PQD0-<e ~ +-_-J~,c52tf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ) 8 ), . .J , . "1" "'"'-" / ""., '1 "~H_L ,..;: k /'/'11 ./ ' v Duvr. XZ1, (c.{[~,':d-/i~ , C,., So :-,v" I _ .'. ,j.,.. I) , .At-t (L 11 /VlI~tL.t.J. .- /J1/ a./u.. /cd.v... t" ~.....t..t:..<.'l-(,""'L<""'l I) -J/J /' .,,/:'/;' - _ ~J. /c!.e(!L)~J'?"-<.~eL cL,<H7kC cJ-/.'c.tL.'-. ..:;:..... c..L..LV~~ ,XLAr~ {/ (/) . C . " ./k' 6,.. /a. /, -0 -<.:(. ...ft0{;,LJ-~6. /)L,.oQ,t- f---Ud.U,.c..f2-i ~'.a.t<. ?'-'a ... ....-c. I'~ '. / / [13/4 /!i~{::.r' 1/ Tf.,.t/-l--7 t<-'/lr/ , ) '7/, D~a:%{ C:'{v&"n~-;'l-"u>t<z4L "-..).1ht/Ja~.r /ltt[a/;Li~:L.l' ~.:z. ~ "'-I.:. I ,~;. J "/ /, .,.. ~ , . . L- :;> -'. -7 e, /1, '--.-"a' I.' ''I.:'''c' /',- CJ ,I CL ~?(, o() ~ U.. /.; I...!!- - (" 9 _ ..-J /,:) '-,., t'_,,- ,~ .CL ....-..( . ~''-'-'''' c~ct.Ja.u~d-. cz, .d..e_ (7JI('LCa..-u...) _--e..~i!~ #<'..r;>.~ /' ..de'-___ U . _~ 'h--. , (\'J A_. J "p:J L c.i..1 iF" ) ;;'tt7.-t,Hd H'u. L.vL /h. a-:; /C-u. LDu2U~.t: '.. /C..U"-~ -/ -.",', J "1 ',,; f., -;{ ,: ,./ (; " t. 13.;/). /(,/lIT C;: 1'/.-'13 T#/S,+ Cr//-t-/t..'I'E. / .c,,'-'l...-..;....' ....(..-(,..'-i"..LL..'l,... V -tf"c.~, - .J)...d-(.~\u... '7k't, ~jl{L?C~(..":' L'ClA.:.;U-:r.~ ...U.L.r,; If)i?~i-::rc.'()KI;, /il ..!.. ~ r(a..u.. tLi./!.D7'V o-a.'r.. ~--U~( ,.{'~u--< vC. ~-<.Cz;'?L'Ci /~t1 ci~(?&. ~lU'ld' '~~h "' CLC--UCC-C- CZ'..-t.c_ ~..., cZ-<v :/?a. i:.. t 1r ,tlu... {!rr.--t...Jclc.., /s J)1((/t//l/I/v'L~ /vt'~rE/{ rIluTEc.77iJ/V i7'lec!.-!GI?AIZ-,/ r:: L E 7S /){;/t C/-//ftSi-=--. 7m3 L/!-,{/v /-fu . tl-e () rE I~} S !;,Llc E I-c.~--;Li!' L i .;/fU!. /4' c..c <( C ....0 u..te.J.- ra.v .-&ua.:z- ~~'z:(f?':(' c/ -{i<;:J A~4 /Jl~Q;t-.1 jen _cAc:.'; ~ /J . tt (/ .j ,..{J,.: L-Q"l!...-d.c_ '-A....C.<'>-tu..., t l Ii 'fc!.~fJ~Vl.d.l'~(':1- ...-'Clc.e.. {j?''-c..~,t..:L(d. ..dtc,t~{.U/~"'':,:.s(, t'7L. (/ (j) .-- z:; 7ti tL C(J..'l...t. a.t ,~a-<'':..'c..c_e:.J J2 j,LLiO,dd _.Ld<L.:_ .' <) '--7, ..' - /,:/. Ch2, [' A!.-t..c< e..e.. LU~, , " . "rl ( .r "') " ]" t/ JI. ;7.\.. 'tl. c..(a,f C<.., 7.0. .x 7L<!- ,., I I I I '. ~:'. , :.:-:.~'~:~... '~'.:'.- I .,...':......,.. .t".::f.'..:......."~. ~:;':':,~;:~.' ~ '::.\: . . :.;~.:;.;~.;: " . .~,~:..~.. . ': ~-.",", . ~t~.t:~~~:. . '~~~~1t.r:~,i~f,...,..~:-, , '~:. '.~~~;;:fi'~:~~~2.. . ~i1.".,.....,...,...' .~ '."I~ ::. t.. . :~~t~:ii~'.,: II fI'!~' :~.~:;;~t~..':~ " ',," .~".-..,':. I I I I 9 c: V Ruth J.,l,ier P. O. Eo:< 5.12 iV\alliluck. New Y 011 11952 ~o;:::;u~- P'~ /'15 juj ',r 1, J.\'11 ~l:-'!lniIH~ ;J3.Qr.i, ,)')uth'_)l(~ Ive a~'e ver-'T ~nltcr~ ~1.;....":;-:tiI1st <-llJY' furtr.~r ';'2vel::>J:nent C\('oun'i L :urel ..,~,..{e. Pauses ):: t~~~ <iHcuri tr9ct T~lll ht~ tilt;") l ..~~I:lrlClin~ - l'~O~'J C:,l[1 ,r~t..:. t~~n n,"'Cuse thl3 i:.H'r,,)IlS <::lu.i f~)r!lle:" 1'::2:11..)\" c~}.mp &l[".~.:e:..ti0s. I r..~ve read tr:t i: tr~e f if'S t b'Juse un ti"1'3 shore U~. a lG...\:e is the oe~,innLnB: of' the ~Grrlise of' t.:-:at l~u~e. ~'I'.)W tr'ere 8!'e 10 tOU$8S ar.H4'1.:! L3u::,;-el L. '-!.n-'1 tr:ey ,'i~f"l'e Duil t -bef;)~"e He -:IJA\o." much '-lU;Hl't or' '.\'):'~i.~' ':1:) .ut 1~r'.virl11""~ld:~~l ". .....:J:J10:r13. ,,'a .,;ro .Live L,:~r>-"~ tr'V l:,) :1'1 Lnt~ in <\Iii :,.lre rJ~' tl,G 12~{G ;1.11'\ sur!'"):l:J~2..11,S. jut .'.lliOt":1 el"' c.:u r.:),,~es fl~:..lr'oy ','-'.JUl i be a jis:i~r;t=>r. ~~,,.; turnll" tt",C 18.nci hill be ~')11 ~ith lA~e ri('I~ts. ~~re ta~ilie~J ~ues~s, U'JH1;S - tr'e In.ce l::.lI't r.:l\{(l it. dun-Jrr rpl;., roa -15, rcrti.Ll~el'" on lCI'.oJns ~;H:rl r:ar,ieas dr3in.iug LfJt;) trH~ l~L{e. ,,-Jh:;lt \-J ill l~_t:"",L)en tJ our ~h~J..ls 'Hvl {!'inl<.iu/;; Hc~tl"-:!r. ,. ~. 'H~ I:ave 1 lv...... , here C'Jr 11 'TL~s.rs Lind sae ~~raHt "r:::w'eR alcean'T. l'he R,:)pe of the l~h:e L~ full )1' 1,'le\7,i:1, tricJudluP' th(;1 s('~l]lo\-J \/:;tl~r. e""'ere L~ ':lU(:~ Ips~ wll~lire - r~~ liuc~sJ ~~ar1 c.r~nAts ';r'~ h:lr.ct:ed but ~ie b~r;J1:'e Pl:1.turitv, :)spr~cv n,J :l.l;J!;ur' fly oV.;,'!l'" r()l~ fi~jh. Dul1Cr:Jf?:s lire sdldom ';~i:Hl 0 r b09. r"t. ~he ,.lan"Lng :>:Japi faces a IlnL,ue cr-allcnr:e in r,hat you havl1 it withill 'Tr}lIl' ::>ot~er t:> be ins1;ru- mene"l ill pruservlnll: all esset for ;Josterity that DIme gonu cun never bo replacect. I '.' ~- ~,..;...;',\ I I ...;,;,.~~ ., \. -r.",;' .~,; .~~ '",\::k .';~Jt :;,'iJ.!- , ':'.!l':.. ;~.;ztl _.t':i"~'\f --at' . .:...t. t~~'; ';"'~~:' ~ ;:"h'~i .".... -~ ~.~~~ I "----- 'I. Jur j:>U t::-J CiOt an d~S~! OuP. a(l,i \-je wts!-. ~r.)U :'::"::'8.t WiDi~~.la a rlifflcult 1eclsion. I'~ - 0\ '..Jt.....:---.... :i:.lth .:v;:;...~, ..J '..7 /} ; . t t.ec-(.~"'.. ""e,..L,.....~ 1\1'\0 '-':l~ i\;~ vat. L..." eo ," I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10 " NORTH FORK EHVIRCN~E!.'4TAL CCUNCDL Route 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799. Mattituck. NY 11952 516-298-8880 July 5, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Macari at Laurel comments on the DE IS Dear Mr. Orlowski, I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate the comments that I made during the pUblic hearing held on the DEIS on June 24, 1991. The two concerns that I requested be thoroughly covered in the PEIS were the site's location within a "special groundwater protection area" (SGPA) and the possibility of acquisition. The discussion of these two issues in the DE IS was inadequate. The DE IS identify's the site as being within the Town's Watershed Protection Area (VII-21), but fails to mention the state "SGPA" designation or the recommendation of the Long Island Regional Planning Board that this site (and others around Laurel Lake) be open space acquisitions. I have enclosed a co~y of the proposed SGPA map for the Laurel Lake watershed area. The FEIS should recognize this recommendation. The PEIS should also go into further discussion concerning Suffolk County's Clean Drinking Water Protection Program. It should discuss the program's mandate that each town make watershed purchases with their allocation from the 1/4 cent sales tax revenue, the recent action of the Legislature"which approved purchases surrounding Laurel Lake and it should be determined if the Suffolk County Department of Parks, Board of Trustees have already recommended that the Macari parcel be acquired. !i .. Don-profit o.ganbaUon for the prea.rv.lion of land. atl'a. ai, lIInd qUOIllt, 01 life printed 011 100'" recycled p.p.' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FRESHWATER WETLANDS The DEIS also stated on page 1II-24 that Land Use Company staff delineated the freshwater wetlands boundary. I would like to request that the DEC be asked !2 flag ~he b~und~ry according to their criteria and that which ever del1neat1on 1S greater be USed for the purposes of mapping this subdivision. FLORA The DEIS states that 7 rare plants have historically been documented as occurring in the vicinity of this subdivision. Discussion as to whether or not they might still be found here is inconclusive. Additional field work, by a Natural Heritage Botanist should be done to determine if any are present on this site. ALTERNATIVES The alternative of a tighter cluster, 30,000 square foot lots, and their placement closer to Sound Avenue should be discussed in the FEIS. The Macari site, and Laurel Lake in general, is an extremely sensitive area. There are endangered species present which according to the DEIS will be permanently displaced (page X-II) and rare plant occurrences that may be destroyed by this subdivision. Further, the site is within a watershed protection area and has been targeted ~or public acquisition. The tax revenues generated by this subdivision will not cover the anticipated costs in education or for other services. Traffic will be increased in an already hazardous area. For these reasons, the North Fork Environmental Council Opposes this subdivision. Thank you for considering our comments on the DEIS. I look forward to reviewing the FEIS when it is completed. Sincerely, 3,<~~~ Sherry Johpson " Program Coordinator Enclosures cc Frank Panek, DEC Kevin Law, Div. of Real Estate -- .' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _. ....-... -'= .......... '- 0 :z ........... <C D- C) tI1 :z <C ~ --l --l D- O ~ l.J.... l.J.... ~ tI1 --l <C 0:::: f- :z w U ~ ~ 1]' ll-,. "0 c; F ,; l~:.. !t ...... '.. n.. ~ ~!:! ~iH~~H ~r:!j:t~~~;E ~. O! o. f~3] " v ~. I .... 6"'116 ~~~L ~ <3 o C ~ '" fElrJ ~L1 rg . . -r., i~ .. ... y 1: ~ .!' " " ~ ~ .. , " ~ ~ ~ -~ ,.. " -j ~ ~ c .. ] ~ .; ;5 ~ ~ of ~, :s .s '" 0 '" > 0", O' Q:::: ~:~ D"" ~ ~ 1:'1:" ~, ,'.'. .... .... i'l, ",' , ;';'1 ~ ;.:; ,- il!~ DO h rt ,. q,j ;;: I~:., ~:~I '.". 1:_,., 1,....--., 0;1 \';,' ~ i<.,,;- "", ,-,-, V'" ...~"-' . ...., ~:'I ~ F:: ,::.". ~. ..; 3 , . ..~ ,'. ~ 'r 1\~ ~ \ r\. '- .' (:-../"-.,., I ..\ T /,\ 'V "- ::: ~ ~ 12 "" c ; ", ~~~~ .~ 'P.;"=' \ .L.....;c: .J I' C. For each year of this program, not less than eight t>er:e:-:.t (8\) of the total sales and compensating use" tn collected for that ye., shall be used to reduce the County'S general property tnes for toe subsequent fiscal year by being credited to revenues in direct proport'"" to tnes assessed and collected by the County of Suffolk from parcels within the County. The funds for this purpose Shall be guaranteed on an annual basis.' (The funds for this subsection shall come. in descend:.nc; order, from the followin9 sources: I 1 (1)' The total sales and compensating use tax collected in any qiven year which shall exceed a seven percent (7\) increase over t~e previous year's actual sales and compensating use tax receipts. using t~.e 1988 receipts as the initial base year; (2) Forfeited or disapproved funds, pursuant to SC12-6(C), whico had originally been set aside for payments to the Towns in accordance Wlth SC12-6; and/or. 1 1 1 (3) An equal percentage reduction of payments to the Towns under SC12-5(D), but in no event to exceed twenty percent (20\) of such payments; (4) Any further surplus funds which exist pursuant to SC12-5(E) (3) . } I O.(l)(a) A -Suffolk County Environmental Trust Fund- (-trust fund") is hereby created. A portion of the funds acquired under this program shall be allocated annually to this trust fund. The monies 1n this trust fund shall be made available to the Towns for the purposes of capping and Closing municipal solid waste landfi lls, ident Hying, characteri.ing and remediating toxic and huardous waste landf i lls. and for other purposes as provided in SC12-5(4}. These funds shall be allocated annually, pursuant to the provisions contained in SC12-5D, and based upon the fOllowing formula: Ten dollars ($10) per capita for the Towns of 100,000 or more in population; Fifteen dollars ($15) per cap>:a for Towns less than 100,000 in population. Provided, however. that in no event shall the annual allocation to the trust fund exceed forty percent (40\) of the total sales and compensating use tax collected for that year pursuant to this Article. Payments to the Towns from this trust func. shall be consistent with the above formula as applied to the respective Towns. In the event that this forty percent (40\) limitation comes into effect, then the payments to each Town shall be reduced in proportion to the percentage share each Town would have received if the forty percent (40\) limitation had not been in effect. The formula for annual pal""ents for any given year, to any given Town, may be exceeded for that year if funds are advanced as described in SC12-5D(5), but the total of any advanced funds, together with any other payments made to the Towns pursuant to SC12-5D and any related administrative, legal or borrowing costs, may not ezceed the estimated share to any given Town over the life of this program, based upon the formulas provided herein, 1 1 1 1 I 1 (b) For Towns where lands are still extant which fit the definitions of -SuffOlk County Pine Barrens Preserve- or -SuffOlk County Water Protection Preserve,. as defined in sections C12-2A and C12-29 of this ArtiClo, no l..s than se'/enty-five percent (75\) of their respective allocations shall be used for acquisitions of such lands, Lane acquisitions made pursuant to this requirement shall be made by the County, on the reCOmmendation of the relevant Town, in accordance w'th the provisions contained within SC12-5A. The County shall retain such amount' from the allocations to the respective Towns which are calculated pursuant to SC12-5D(1)(a} above. I I .. 1 (2) An "Environmental Trust Fund Review Board" shall be createe and Shall be comprised of the County Executive, each of the ten (10) Towr Supervisors, the Commissioner of the County's Department of Healt~ Services and the Director of the County's Planning Department, or the>: respective designated repreaentatives. This Review Board shall b. responsible for reviewinq requests and makinq recommendations for tho allOCation of monies to the Towns, from the trust fund, for the cappin. and ClOSing of municipal solid waste landfills and/or for the identifYln:; characteri.ing and remediating of toxic and ha.ardous waste landfills. 1 1 the be (3) The Environmental Trust Fund Review Board shall convene a earliest possible time to prepare an estimate of the monies that shal available to the trust fund over the life, of the proqram. .. I I ... I " owner :oject : .O',m OF soUTHAMPTON cont. WOODLANDS-GREAT SWAMP AREA -SOUTH FORK MOP~INE 0900-039-01-018 0900-039-01-019.1 0900-039-01-020 Rich~rd G. Hendrickson David B. Schellinger Catherine Kelly &'Bricget Kelly " Aubrey V. Vannostrand Mary Louise Masin & James Fahy David B. schellinger David B. schellinger 'David B. schellinger David B. schellinger Unknown William Mulvihill Carl Klepper Robert B. Bear & Peter Robert B. Bear & Peter Robert E. Bear & Peter William Mulvihill Robert B. Bear & Peter s~r.ub Robert B. Bear & Peter Schu~ II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0900-039-01-031.5 0900-039-01-026.1 0900-039-01-028.2 0900-039-01-043.1 0900-039-01-044 0,00-039-01-042 0:30()-03:3-01-045 0:300-039-01-046 0900-039-01-035 0900-039-01-037 0900-039-01-038 0900-039-01-039 0900-039-01-040 0900-039-01-041 C900-039-01-015 Schul:. Schub Schub ':IF.C:-! CREEK-OWL 0500-171-01-020 0900-171-01-021 POND ADDITION sub Total TOWN OF SOUTHOLD L';UF.EL LAKE 1000-121-04-8.4 1000-121-04-8.3 1000-121-05-pjo 100Q-122-02-pjo 1000-125-01-013 1000-125-01-001 4.1 025 Walter & Marilyn Gat= Sarbara Kujawski Michael & Mary Adamowicz A T Holding Corp. Harold Avent Aldri Assoc. Sub Total Exhibit B Total ~ " Requires Board of Trustee Approval In the contractual process, proceeds Phase I to come out of'S100 million bond in ( K) Appro;.: . Acreage ,. 16.6 4.3 27 23.3 2.9 17.3 13.9 e.o 4.0 9.9 3.0 5.1 5.0 5.0 11.2 4.3 5.0 11.4 3.0 ~ Q ,. - 5.8 4 - .. I 4.7 20. 10.4 ~- .,~ 4:;.6 Acres 276.65 Sub 'rlatersr. 15 11 Sudgi:t ::5tima ,1'IS/ClCiO /. 5,406.653 7C.,J7c NOTE: APPRAISALS MUST STILL BE OP~E COSTS ARE FOR BUDGETARY PURPOSES ONLY. COMPLETED AND REVIEWED ON HOST PARCELS EXHIBIT B-7 , ' , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' Illvte: I I owner fOUTHOLD :,' .~rel Lake, Laurel " 1000-125-01-014 "1000-121-04-009.1 '"1000-121-04-010.1 '.1000-121-03-007.1 Nofo :.ssociates Joseph T. Macari George O. Guidi peconic Homes ccrp. " Sub Total TOTAL TOWN P.ECot'oMEHDED FARCELS " Approved by Park Trustees ., Requires Approval from Environmental Trust Fund COSTS ARE FOR BUDGETARY PURPOSES ONLY. COliPLETED AND REVIEWED ON 'MOST PARCELS AfJ..>l. ,-".;. Acreage 32 6LE 8.2 46.9 Acres 1~,1. 7 ;'.cres 1,788.2 .,)d~ 'riatersr.-=d " 12 Bl:dc;et "st;n-t- ;_ _1""-= ':l,~C:O)OCO. ' Elldg-=t Estim~t= ~s., ~30 ceo.' I . APPP~ISALS MUST STILL EE ORDERE~, EXHIBIT l\,-5 1,1 I , PLAN -- " I I CENTRAL SUFFOLK SGPA (North) I I I ~ ---- I I I <' C7 ~ l'~-.- :17 ..... ;..:J, ----- \ Pff''-'i~ ['_""17F] !.!,:.;.O.'..J .;,...;.......J-.=... '-- I 1:::l;,;,.i'-'''j!'i<:J, 1- trL..~l~.I..j,:.l;.!) _ I 04 TE; 1-91 l:.::::I'I:J ~:,.'...... =c;= i7':=- u I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;' 11 Karen E. Gross 460 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 'jUf;f1t.E 1-iJ MS 1/5 eft! July 3, 1991 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Macari at Laurel Dear Mr. Orlowski and Planning Board Members: I am writing on behalf of the Laurel Lake Property Owners Association (the "Association"), an organization of the owners of property on Laurel Lake and Mark D. Gross, a member of the Association and a homeowner on Laurel Lake, in opposition to the proposed Macari at Laurel project (the "Project"). The homes of Mr. Gross and many of the Association's members are located adjacent to or near the site of the proposed Project (the "Site") and Laurel Lake, and would be directly affected by the Project. These comments address the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") submitted on behalf of the applicant for the proposed Project. The Project as proposed would irretrievably alter the character of the scenic Laurel Lake area by converting the present tranquil rural landscape, which is designated as open space in the Town's Master Plan, into a suburban subdivision with a concomitant increase in noise, air pollution and traffic'-' The proposal also threatens to cause the degradation of the water quality of the groundwater, Laurel Lake, a pristine freshwater lake, and its associated wetlands. ~ The DEIS fails to completely identify these and other adverse effects of the Project, address mitigative measures and discuss alternatives. The Project requires further study to accurately determine the nature and level of impacts presented by the proposed development, the cumulative impact of it and the other proposals for the environmentally sensitive Laurel Lake area, and .1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '. alternatives to the Project as proposed. concern are addressed below. The major areas of. A. Water Dualitv The Long Island Regional Planning Board ("LIRPB") has designated the Site as a Special Groundwater Protection Area pursuant to Article 55 of the Environmental Conservation Law. That statute is designed to protect sole source aquifers on Long Island from further groundwater contamination. I understand that the LIRPB has studied the Laurel Lake area and has recommended that the Site remain open space. As reflected in the attached article from Newsdav, the Laurel Lake area has been given top priority for acquisition by Suffolk County under the groundwater protection program established by Article 55. A bond resolution to borrow funds for the acquisition of critical aquifer recharge areas, such as the Laurel Lake area, was approved by the County Legislature on June 12, 1991. It is critical that the DEIS address in depth the LIRPB's land use recommendations with respect to the Site, the consistency of the proposed Project with those recommendations and the alternative of acquisition by the County under the groundwater protection program. Although the DEIS refers to groundwater quality in the area generally, it fails to specifically analyze groundwater quality on the site. The DEIS also does not appear to analyze the cumulative effect of nitrogen levels caused by the Project and projected ambient nitrogen levels in the groundwater in the build year for the Project. The DEIS also fails to adequately address mitigation of the impacts of nitrogen from lawn fertilizers and chloride from road salt on the groundwater, private residential wells, wetlands and Laurel Lake. Eutrophication of the Lake as a result of nutrient loading also should be analyzed. Measures to mitigate the adverse impact of fertilizers, such as restrictions on the amount of lawn areas and the prohibition of the use of fertilizers should be discussed. The DEIS also should address mitigative measures and alternatives to road salt, such as limitations on the use of salt, and/or the use of sand or gravel. B. Potential Use of Laurel Lake as a Potable Water Supplv The DEIS acknowledges that Laurel Lake is a potential source of drinking water (DEIS at III-57) but does not assess the critical issue of the impact of the Project.on the future use of Laurel Lake as a source of drinking water. .Tfie DEIS should analyze the present water quality of the Lake, the expected impact of the Project alone, and the cumulative impact of it and other projects proposed for the area on the water quality of the Lake. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . ,. C. Pesticides As the site was used for farming from 1920 until the early 1980's, both the groundwater and the soil should be tested for residual pesticides. soil testing is critical for a proposed residential development because children may ingest contaminated soil while playing out-of-doors. D. Wetlands The DEIS does not describe the wetlands on the Site in sufficient detail. Notably, Parts III B. and C. of the DEIS, which address the present biological and hydrological setting, do not contain a section on wetlands. The DEIS should include a map showing New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC") designated wetlands and adjacent areas. It should indicate the activities for which a NYSDEC freshwater wetlands permit may be required and discuss how the proposed Project would satisfy NYSDEC's regulatory requirements for permit issuance. The DEIS should also indicate whether the wetlands are subject to the jurisdiction of the United states Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") pursuant to Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act, whether a Corps permit would be required, and if so, how the Project would meet the federal regulatory requirements. The size of a appropriate buffer to protect wetland areas also should be addressed. (The DEIS states that no roadways or houses would be built within 50 feet of wetlands but contains no further analysis.) (DEIS at V-56.) E. Flora and Fauna The DEIS should include more stringent measures to minimize the impact of the Project on existing vegetation and wildlife, as by restricting clearing on the lots, further minimizing lawn areas, and preserving avian habitats and wildlife corridors. The DEIS does not, but should, include the results of a recent on-site field survey and specify the date of that survey. In this regard, the DEIS fails to adequately address the impact of the Project on the wildlife which occupy the wetlands surrounding Laurel Lake. These wetlands are directly connected to the on-site pond adjacent to Laurel Lake. For example, the great blue heron has been observed in the Laurel Lake wetlands, but does not appear to be mentioned in the DEIS. ," F. Traffic There are numerous deficiencies in the Traffic Study (Appendix D). The Study does not address variations in traffic volume during the year and the marked increase in traffic during the summer months. In particular, the Study does not state the 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .' dates that traffic volume data was collected. should have been collected during the summer volume is highest. In addition', the projected traffic volume calculations do not include projected traffic from the Miller and Jacoby development proposals, which the Planning Board required to be included in a generic environmental impact statement ("GElS") for the proposed developments in the Laurel Lake area. The use of a mid-1992 build year is not appropriate in view of the applicant's proposed five-year construction schedule. Further traffic analysis is required to reflect summer traffic conditions, the impact of the Miller and Jacoby proposals, and a 1996 or later build year. Traffic volume data months, when traffic The Traffic study indicates that the level of service on Sound Avenue and Cox Neck Road would be reduced from B to C if all proposals addressed in the Study are built. The DEIS should address alternatives which would reduce that adverse impact on traffic, including a development with lower density. There are also two errors in the Traffic Study which should be corrected. The location map does not depict the Macari proposal. In addition, Figure 3 presumably shows existing ambient traffic projected to 1992, and not 1990 as stated on page 13. G. Erosion and Sediment Control Due to the unavoidable effect of siltation from the proposed regrading activities, the DEIS should include a specific soil erosion and sediment control plan which contains a detailed discussion of mitigative measures which would prevent erosion and protect Laurel Lake and the wetlands from siltation during the proposed 5-year period of construction. H. Scenic Resources The DEIS does not adequately address the visibility of the proposed Project at different times of year from Sound Avenue or the rights-of-way that present residents use for access to their homes. The DEIS also does not discuss the relationship of the proposed road system to the existing unpaved rights-of-way. Alternatives providing for larger buffers along Sound Avenue, the rights-of-way and the proposed road system to screen the project and reduce noise, should be addressed. 1. Alternatives " A crucial feature of a DEIS is a discussion of alternatives which may reduce the adverse impacts of the project. The DEIS fails miserably in this regard. The only construction alternatives discussed are a 27 lot subdivision and 27 unit cluster development. In addition to the alternative of acquisition by the 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,. County (See Item A), the DEIS should discuss design alternatives which would further mitigate the adverse effects of the Project on flora, fauna, Laurel Lake, wetlands and water quality by increasing buffer areas and maximizing protection of natural areas. The discussion of alternatives should also include a project of smaller magni tude, which would reduce the adverse impacts of the proj ect on water quality, Laurel Lake, wetlands, flora, fauna, wildlife habitat and traffic conditions. J. Cumulative Impacts The cumulative impacts section of the DEIS does not satisfy the Planning Board's requirement that a GEIS addressing the cumulative impact of all proposed projects for the environmentally sensitive Laurel Lake area be prepared. Ideally, the DEIS should describe the biological setting of all proposed projects, and not simply address cumulative impacts in one abbreviated section. In addition to the lack of detail required for a GEIS, the cumulative impacts section suffers from the following glaring deficiencies. The DEIS fails to include an adequate description or composite map of the other proposed actions. It simply ignores the Miller proposal for the property sandwiched between the wetlands on Laurel Lake and the Macari site. (See DEIS at X-5.) The cumulative impacts of the Macari and Miller projects on Laurel Lake and the wetlands would be considerable, and should be thoroughly analyzed. In addition, I understand that the McFeely project is proposed for the former Camp Malloy property. The DEIS refers to Camp Malloy in connection with the New York State conservation area as open space which could serve as a wildlife and avian habitat. (DEIS at X-14, X-16.) If Camp Malloy is indeed slated for development, the cumulative analysis in the DEIS is based on inaccurate information. These omissions and errors in the cumulative impact section must be corrected, and a new analysis performed based on accurate information. The DEIS also fails to analyze the cumulative effect of the Project and the other proposed developments on Laurel Lake or its wetlands. The increased nitrogen concentrations may result in a degradation of water qu ality and the eutrophication of the lake. The DEIS should also discuss the impact that the increase in local population would have on the lake in terms of increased recreational Use (i.e., swimming, boating and fishing) of the Lake. The DEIS also fails to address the cumulative growth inducing aspects of the proposed projects. The influx of 325 residents to the area ma9 increase demand for business services and induce new commercial and retail developments. This secondary impact of the proposed developments should be addressed. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I K. Conclusion In sum, the Project as proposed' should not be approved. Further study and analysis of the impact'of the Project, including alternative designs and lower densities, and the cumulative effect of the Project and the numerous other developments proposed for the environmentally sensitive Laurel Lake area is required. Careful and thorough analysis is especially critical with respect to impacts on groundwater quality and the fragile ecosystem of Laurel Lake and the wetlands. sincerely, I~c.i..."-^- (v'y/ur,,::-:::. Karen E. Gross KEG/HC ," 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4TH STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format. PAGE ,. Copyright (c) 1991 Newsday, Inc.; Newsday June 12, 1991, Wednesday, NASSAU AND SUFFOLK EDITION SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 7 , LENGTH: 812 words HEADLINE: Suffolk to Borrow $ 50M for pine Barrens BYLINE: By Rick Brand. STAFF WRITER KEYWORD: SUFFOLK COUNTY; LANDMARK; PROGRAM; LEGISLATURE; BUDGET; DEFICIT; PINE BARRENS; REAL ESTATE; LAND; ENVIRONMENT; CONSERVATION; NATURE; NATURE CONSERVANCY BODY: To the cheers and whoops of dozens of environmentalists, the Suffolk legislature yesterday approved the borrowing of the last $ 50 million needed tc buy pine barrens under the county's landmark program to acquire sensitive watershed lands. Despite concerns about the county's $ 127 million budget gap for 1991-1992, lawmakers voted 17-0, with one abstention, to approve the bond resolution afte County Executive Patrick Halpin modified the original measure so that no borrowing would take place until sept. 1. Officials say they expect to develop plan to resolve the county's fiscal problems by then. "The groundwater protection program is one of the great success stories of Suffolk County," said Legis. Fred Thiele (R-Sag Harbor), "and I think we're ready to move ahead because we've covered all the bases to protect the financi. integrity of the county." The vote on the pine barrens money was one of three environmental initiative legislators acted on. Lawmakers also put aside until Aug. 27 a move to eliminate funding to purchase Robins Island, a 420-acre spit in peconic Bay. The move carne after the Nature Conservancy, a national environmental group, agreed yesterday to pay fOl an appeal of a federal bankruptcy court decision throwing out the county's $ 9.2-million contract for purchase. A growing number of. legislators indicated that they were ready to balk at legal bills, which have totaled $ 500,000 so far. Andrew Walker, director of the Long Island chapte~ of the Nature Conservanc'. said the offer by the organization is "very unusual, but we're willing to take- the extraordinary step because we believe there are excellent legal grounds anc we believe it is important to preserve Robins Island in its entirety." The legislature also approved borrowing $ 3 million for the acquisition of six parcels for the county's $ 69-million open space program _ including 5.4-acres on Ketcham Woods Creek in Babylon, 37 acres on Beaver Dam Creek in Brookhaven and 41 acres in Montauk. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . PAGE (c) 1991 Newsday, June 12, 1991." ,. "It's a great day for the environment and the protection of our precious drinking water," said Halpin. "On one hand, the economy has posed certain problems for the county government, but it also gives a tremendous opportunity to acquire pristine land at affordable prices." , But it was the funding for the pine barrens that brought cheers from more than 40 environmentalists, many carrying signs reading: "Keep it green, Keep 1 clean," and "Now is the time to buy." The legislature approved the pine barrer money after more than a dozen speakers, emphasizing that more than 80 percent the public voted twice (in 1987 and in 1988) for the pine barrens program and that the economy is making land available at bargain prices. "I think the people of the. _county want you to put aside the partisan politi and the fiscal mess," said Randall Parsons of East Hampton. "This is a sacred cow to the people of this county . . . They want you to nurture it. They want you to fund the program." Through the program, funded by one-quarter cent on each dollar of the sales tax to the year 2000, the county has already spent $ 92 million of its origina $ 100 million bond authorization, acquiring 6,500 acres of critical water recharge areas throughout the county, mainly in Brookhaven and the East End. ~ $ 50 million approved yesterday is the last money the county expects to borro~ for pine barrens acquisition. The new funding will allow the county to pursue purchases from a list of me than 7,200 acres, worth about $ 120 million. Among the top priorities are 250 acres of Warbler Woods in Yaphank, where the county has already bought 300 acres, 120 acres around Laurel Lake in Southold and JOO-acre Stony Hill Wooe in East Hampton. Legis. Joseph Rizzo (R-Islip Terrace) abstained, saying he wants a new referendum on the program because public sentiment may have changed in light c the downturn in the economy. "We're on the verge of bankruptcy, and shutting down Fridays," he said. "I think it's time we listen to the public again." Halpin aides downplayed the fiscal impact, saying the bonds, backed by dedicated sales tax revenues, are viewed in a different light than other Obligations. However, they said they agreed to change the proposal because thE do not expect to enter the market place to borrow money before September. In other action the legislature: Appointed Babylon Republican Richard Krumholz, 46, to the three-member boar of SUffolk Off-Track Betting Corp. Krumholz, who ran against Legis. Sandra Bachety (O-Babylon) two years ago, replaces Gilbert Stern: . ~ . Approved an emergency resolution ordering the health department to corne up with a plan within 90 days to provide developers with alternatives to denitrification septic tank systems that the state Department of Environmental Conservation says it will no longer approve. GRAPHIC: Newsday Photo by George Argeroplos- Sherry Johnson of the North Fork Environmental Council addresses the legislature I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ORAL COMMENTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . , June 24, 1991 Planning Board Minutes at Public Hearing on Macari at Laurel SCTM*1000-12l-4-9 Mark Gross: My name is Mark Gross I live on Laurel Lake, I'm a member of the Laurel Lake property owners association. Our attorney has looked over the environmental statement and is going to be sending a letter to the Planning Board, because they feel there are deficiencies in the statement. There are a few points I wanted to mention that concerns me and I'm sure concerns other members of the Laurel Lake property owners association. One of these is the run off that we are going to be experiencing into Laurel Lake and into the wetlaCld~ as a result of this development. There will be fertilizers, conceivably pesticides, salt from the roads and I'm worried about the quality of the water in the lake and what will happen to the wildlife in the lake, the migratory birds that we get and the wildlife that we have there all year round. I'm also concerned about the character of the neighborhood and if it will change from a rural neighborhood to a suburban neighborhood. And the loss of open space, and this includes the considerable amount of traffic which we have right now, and will certainly increase when this development goes in. Bennett Orlowski: o.k. I'd just like to note the public comment period will run until July 5th. Mark Gross: Yes, we're aware of that. Bennett Orlowski: o.k. Any other comments? Ray Herfurth: My name is Ray Herfurth, my parents own a piece of property on Laurel Lake. I've been coming out to the lake since I was about 4 years old, better than 20 years. I think its a darn crying shame the last real bastion of beautiful land that we have out in this area that attracts a lot people and is not necessarily destroyed, but possibly could be. We recognize everyone here has some baCkground and has looked into the environmental impact but just from a personal standpoint, I've been coming our here for the beauty and the ability to get away from the big hustle and bustle of the city. I mean if somebody wants to put a development in, let him put it in but not near our lake. That's really the comment that I'd like to make and the feeling I think everyone in the property owner's association got and I guess I'm really aSking you as the-board members what I could do personally to prevent this from happening.? Bennett Orlowski: That's a good question. You can make comments until July 5th, if you have any comments on the environmental impact. Ray Herfurth: It's not necessarily environmental impact I'm concerned about, just aesthetically. / I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Bennett Orlowski: Well, that's all part of it. Have you reviewed the environmental impact? Ray Herfurth: That I have not, I was just'made aware of it about 3 days ago to tell you ,the truth. I Bennett Orlowski: Well you can call the office, the libraries so you can take a look at it, get you comments in writing. Judy Greco: I'm Judy Greco and I live on Laurel Lake and this directly affects me and directly affect my drinking water because these houses will be adjacent to the back of all my property. What I can't believe is that the Town goes to all the trouble of printing up this, (holds up pamphlet) for the libraries, for the post office for the watershed and the environment, and the impact it will have, and tells us about our garbage and what we can do and then can approve something like this. I think, I don't know how you justify printing what we should do and approving this at the same time. Bennett Orlowski: Any other comments? Robert Weintrablsp): My name is Robert Weintrab, my mother-in- law, Ernaline Lee, lives on Laurel Lake. We had some questions regarding the open space and what your plans were for the open space if this was to be approved. We're not very clear. Is this to be used by everyone? Will it be public? Bennett Orlowski: Well, the open space right now is a question that the Town Board and this Board is discussing, but right now it stays with the owners of the subdivision. Robert Weintrablsp): These 27, if this was approved, these 27 houses would have access to the lake and people would go down to the lake on this right of way and use it. Would there be facilities, bathrooms, parking lot, police, garbage? We would like to address all of these issues it would seem before you just turned lose... Bennett Orlowski: Have you reviewed the impact statement? Robert weintrab: I have. Bennett Orlsowki: o.k. Robert Weintrablsp): So we're very concerned-what this is going to do to the lake, to the land around the lake, pOllution, garbage who is going to look after facilities? It seems as though there is a small piece of wetlands on the lake and a narrow band on sort of a sloping hill. Are they going to remove that hill to make a parking lot, are they going to... it seems as though its not very clear. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .' Bennett Orlowski: Right now the hearing is addressing the impact statement. Mr. Voorhis is here. He's our environmental consultant reviewing this. Chic maybe you could just hold it up and show everybOdy the size of this impact'statement that you have a copy of there. Chic Voorhis: There is some information here that may cover that. What Benny indicated is that there really no plan for it at this time. What I could mention just to give a little more information is that any activity adjacent to the lake or the wetlands would still require wetland comments from the Town Trustees as well as the state DEC. This is a wetlands designated under Article 24 of the environmental conservation law. Any activity within 100 feet would require additional permits. There's no mention of it. At this time we are not aware of any plans for putting in docks, parking lots or any facilities down in that area. Based on the EIS and based on the known permits that are on file, applications that are on file, so that may help you some. Its something that hasn't come up; we're not aware of any plans for it. They would need further permits. Robert Weintraub: Would this be a selling point for the subdivision? Bennett Orlowski: They can't do that now. They can only do what they show us on the subdivision map; and the impact statement, as Chic says, is addressing that, and that's what we're taking about tonight; not the subdivision. Its the draft environmental impact statement. From here we go on to a final before we address the subdivision. Chic Voorhis: Comments will be responded to in writing as far as part of the record. Robert Weintrab: They will be. Audience member: Yes Robert Weintrab: We also wondered who would be looking after this area if these 27 families had access to it. Who would look after it to make sure it remained in the natural state it is in, garbage, litter. . Judy Greco: In the spring I take my paper bag and my plastic bags and my truck and I walk up and down pic~ifig up the beer cans, the soda cans, the bottles, the old cigarette cartons and I don't mind doing it because I feel we're doing it to keep the area the beautiful spot that it is. But if you have 27 more families I mean I'm one person, how many more families in there are going to be picking up with us? My main concern is the watershed, is really the water. I want to be able to drink the water I have well water. I want to be able to drink the water. I can't have my grandchildren drink it because of the nitrates I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I " now. I have to buy bottled water. 27 more families in there; that is concerned. Thank you. What's it going to do with really an issue as far as I'm " Bennett Orlowski: Any o.ther comments? i: Ray Herfurth: I just have a quick question for you. You said that any comments in writing to the Board will be addressed and we have until July 5th to do that? And they have to be addressed just to the board? Bennett Orlowski: Yes. And these comments tonight will be addressed also. .. Sherry Johnson: On behalf of North Fork Environmental Council we will be providing detailed comments later on this week. But just to get into the record tonight, I like to be sure the draft environmental impact statement and FEIS discussed the issue of County acquisition, which is particularly important, as the legislature recently approved a list that contained this parcel. Also the issue that the recommendations of the special ground water protection areas study be discussed in the FEIS if they weren't in the draft. That's the extent of my comments tonight. Thank you. Bennett Orlowski: Any other comments? ,-