Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFacility Site Plan 1000--141--.3--19 ZONING R 0 RES. LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF INDEPENDENT GROUP HOME LIVING PROGRAM INC. ~ EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING TO REMAIN PAVEMENT PROPOSED MOBILE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COMPOUND ~111~, : .~ AND FLAGPOLE. SEE 1/SP-2 FOR ENLARGED PLAN. LANDLORD(S): DATE: XgO EXIS~NG CHAINLINK FENCE WITH BARB WIRE DATE: RF ENGINEERING: DATE: -(5) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS SET ON PROJECT MANAGER: DATE- ~ ~ ~"'x~'~'~v PROPOSED 100'-0" FLAGPOLE. ZOo. · / T AS SUCH A) O ; ALL ELSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. 1 745 SQ.FT. ~ ~ / B) THE pROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND (:)~ WILL BE VISITED APPROXIMATELY ONCE A MONTH FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED TO GENERATE ADDITIONAL NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, BUST, ODORS ~~ / OR TRAF~FIC. ~. % / C) NO *DDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN ~,~ UNMANNED SITE. ~/04~4~¢ / D) NO SOLID OR LIQUID WASTE WILL BE PRODUCED BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS Ct'~ AN UNMANNED SITE. / ~ / EXIS~NG STORAGE BUILDING TO REMAINL E) NO WATER OR SEWAGE FACILITIES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED USE. ,~,9 ~ ~ / THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL OR RETAIL SIGNS, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE F) ~ ~: pSRE(~?~E¢Ow~4RKA.NB 805.5 OF THE CODES. RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE STATE OF /, / __ ~, ~x~ TAX LOT ;5 PRO?DSED SITE. · ~ /~ ~ ~h 1000 141 .3-55 G) FIRE PROTECTION AND SECURITY PROVISIONS WILL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF /\ ~ ZONING L ~ IND. THE SUBJECT SITE. / ALFRED 130UFFARD H) ANTENNAS ARE TO BE PAINTED COLOR DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. BITUMINOUS I) THE ANTENNA AND ANTENNA MOUNT STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE / PAVEMENT CONS!aERATION OF ICING. FURTHER, THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH . .~' / ~/ j) THE t,ONSTRUCTION OF THIS FACILITY SHALL ALSO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1030.1F OF TGE CODES, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE STATE OF PROPOSED WORK, FOR LOT 19 1 SO.FT. ~,3'~ 89.38 -- EXISTING LUMBER STORAGE BUILDINGS TO REMAI~ ToEXISTINGREMAI~L-RESIDENTIAL DWELLING ~ ~ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ~ ~\ RIM RIM 88.54 90.16 9_ 1 01 SO.FI-. @ 0 I~) 88.56 0 / / / EXISTING ADJACENT PROPER~Y LINE / EXISTING STORAGE BUILDINGS TO EXISTING 2 STORY FRAME OFFICE BUILDING TO REMAIN. 2742 SQ.FT. ZONING LI RES. TAX LOT 40 1000--141 --.3-4-0 ~ ZONING L ~ VACANT LAND NOW OR FORMERLY OF SITE PLAN ~ 1 "=20'-0" MONUMENT FOUND 0.2'S NOTE: The appro'~ed site development plan shall be ~lld for a r:,~, ~ ,' ,' ~',':-c r3) },cars Eom thc ~at~ of approval as per S,TE INFORMATION NOTE: INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN IS BASED UPON A SURVEY PREPARED BY: BARRETT. BONACCI & VAN WEELE. P.C. CIVIL/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS, 175A COMMERCE DRIVE HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 (65~) 4~5-1022 (ON NOVEMBER 1.2002 PROJECT NO: AO21168) NOTE: DRAWINGS DEPICT THE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS, MOUNTING FRAMES. CABLING. HANDHOLES ETC. THAT ARE TO BE PLACED ON AN PROPOSED MONOPOLE STRUCTURE. A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL PERFORMED BY OTHERS. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF PROPSED ANTENNA COMPONENTS. AS REQUIRED TO EVALUATE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE FOR ADEQUACY OF SUPPORT FOR THE NEWLY APPLIED LOADS OF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT· ANALYSIS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A NEA¥ YORK STATE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. THE EVALUATION REPORT AND REMEDIAL DESIGN IF REQUIRED SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED. OWNER SHALL BE ;IDLE FOR VERIFYING STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE OWNER INFORMATION: CONTACT: DEAN LOCKE PHONE: (516) 885-OB79 LONGITUDE: W 72' 51' LATITUDE: N 40' 59' 22" O' 5' 10' 50' 1 "=30' NORTH WILLIAM F. COLLIN~ AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP 10-1 ~LOGY DRIVE liErAUlll~l; NY ~ VOICE: 6~-~9-84~0 FAX: ~ http://www.wfcalt.co~ ISSUED FOR P~LMNARY REMEW FOR APPROVALS FO~ FL~G REISSUED FOR FU~IG REISSUED FOR FLUNG [~JSSUED AS PER OMNIPOINTS COMMENTS --N Omnlpolntl COMMUNICATIONS INC. as an agent for Omnipoint Facilities Network 2, LL.C. Highpoint Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470 MATTITUCK 12585 SOUl~) AVENUE MATTITUCK, RY. 11952 LF13-411-B SITE PLAN AND NOTES SCAU~ AS NOTED SP-I EXISTING TREES, TYP. OF EXISTING PAVEM DRYWELL TO REMAIN DASHED CIRCLE INDICATES NEW lO'e DRYWELL BELOW GRADE NEW 10'~ CONCRETE RING WITH DRAINAGE ORATE DASHED LINE INDICATES EXISTING 20'x20' SECTION OF ASPHN.T TO SE PATCHED AND RESTORED TO SAME IF NOT BETTER CONDITION, NEW ASPHALT TO PITCH TO NOTE: I ~ PITCH GRADES AND CONTOURS WITHIN NEW COMPOUND TO NEW DRYWELL. ~ -- PROVIDE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY NO. CRATE COVER. (T~PICAL) FINISHED PAVEMENT 24'~ PRECAST CONC. RING D~I~GE CALCU~ONS: (2" OES~ON ~INF~L R~ENTION) EQUIV. DRAIN DESIGN X DESIGN RAINF~L ~ DESIGN VOL 1 SUS-TOT~ = 55 C.F. x ~0' DIA, RING I STO. CAPACI~ OF 10' DIA. RING = 68.42 CF~F STO~ ~R~L Omnipoint MATTITUCK .................................... scala: 12585 SOlD AVE~ ~W~D~OeOL~ I AS NOrD ~-13~1 I-B 02~756 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: (2" DESIGN I:~.INEALL R~-~ENTJON) 3 EXISTING FENCE. HAINLINK /--=- PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH ' ' ,' : .. -- PROPOSEC CHAINLINK FENCE '', - : ' -' *--~.,~ / TRANSFOR ~ ' : POURED C EXISTING LOCATIONS FOR FUTURE ~~--~ ' I CARRIERS BY OTHERS. --~ ~~-~-- _'' ' - L-' ~ RELOCATEEPROPOSED PROPOSED ELEC/TELCO~ UNISTRUT FRAME. .- . - · ~ - - -~ PROPOSED c PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA FASTENED TO METER BAD c PROPOSED EQUIPMENT [ .-~/ CARRIERS. PROPOSED ROUTE OF ~ PROPOSED ELECTRICAL I~ PROPOSED CONDUITS TRENCHED (24) COAXIAL ANTENNA~ UNDERGROUND FROM ~ ,~ CONDUIT T CABLES IN PROPOSED 18" PROPOSED ELECTRIC J~ X PROPOSED ALUMINUM CABLE TRAY ME~R TO PROPOSED/ PROPOSED SET ON WOOD SLEEPERS. ~ ELECTRIC PANEL. PROPOSED LOCATION~ ~ PROPOSED OF (3) OMNIPOINT ~ ~ CABINET or EQUIPMENT CABINETS ~' I STRONGWEL ON PROPOSED 10' X/ ~ I /'~/I 20' POURED CONCRETE PROPOSED SLAB. FLAGPOLE X " X- X IJ X- X ELECTRIC MER ON CONCRt:~E STORM DRAIN TO BE ELECTRIC TEL~CO TRENCHED ID FROM CSC BOX TO EQUIPMENT. CSC TELCO _ PULL BOX. QUAD POL MOUNTED TO FLAGPOLE X X PROPOSED CPS ANTENNA FASTENED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET.. PROPOSED UNISTRUT SUPPORT FRAME TO MOUNT PROPOSED ELECTRICAL AND TELCO PANELS. -- LOCATION OF (3) PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON PROPOSED 8" POURED CONCRETE SLAB. PROPOSED 18" CABLE TRAY SET ON GALV. STEEL SLEEPERS TO ROUTE (24) PROPOSED 1-1/4" ANTENNA CABLES TO PROPOSED FLAGPOLE. T.0. PROPOSED FLAGPOLE AND PROPOSED OMNIPOINT ANTENNAS RAM. ~_ OF PROPOSE[:) ANTENNAS RAM. ~_ OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS~¢ (6) PROPOSED OMNrPOINT PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED INSIDE PROPOSED FLAGPOLE PROPOSED 100' HtCH FLAGPOLE (2} PROPOSED E-911 ANTENNAS FASTENED TO UNIVERSAL BI-BRACKET AND ATFACHED TO FLACPOLE. 60'-0"± AGL ~ T.O. OMNIPOINT E911 ANTENNAS ~ E___X.I~TING BUtLO{NG (BEYOND) PROPOSED 10' X 20' X 6' HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE ENCLOSURE WITH LOCKABLE CATE. PROPOSED ELECTRIC METER BANK FOR (5) CARRIERS. 7'- 1"'± AGE T.O. OMNIPOINT EOUIPMENT~ GRADE EQUIPMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH I NOTG: EMS ANTENNA TYPE DR65-18-O2DP DUAL DUALPOL POLARIZATION NEW RF TRANSPARENT STEEL POLE (6) NEW EMS QUADPOL ANTENNAS SECTOR C 270' NEW EMS CLUSTER MOUNT MOUNTING BRACKETS (TYP) . RF CONNECTORS-- RF CONNECTORS-- TOP VIEW BACK FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW 4'-5 1/8" PLAN · EQUIPMENT CAB. --NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABINET SUPPLIED BY CARRIER, INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. NOTE: ~ (5) CABINETS TO BE NORTEL S12000 EQUIPMENT CABIN SUPPLIED BY OMNI~01NT, AND IN§TALLED BY eONTP~0TOR. REFER TO CABINET MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS: 75-1/8" TALL x 53" WIDE x 27--1/2" DEEP CELL CAPACITY: 12 TRX CALLS PER UNIT WEIGHT: 1212 LBS ELECTRIC REQUIRED: 230V TO 24DV 'PROPOSED OPS ANTENNA BY NAIS MODEL VIC-100 ATFACHED TO BTS CABINET_ COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION WITH OMNIPOINT RF ENGINEER. ---GPS L ADAPTER BRACKET AND GASKET. OPS CABLE A~FACH CABINET TO SUB-BASE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH 1/2" HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS. PROPOSED REINFORCED POURED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE. SECURE PROPOSED OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET SUBASE TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH 1/2" S/S ROBS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-150 CHEMICAL ANCHORS. MINIMUM 5-1/2" EMBEDMENT. (TYP.) ANTENNAqDETAILS 4 TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: /2"=1 '-0" WILLIAM F. COLLIN,~ AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP VOICE: ~1:-~9-8450 FAX: 631'-~9'-8459 htt p://www.wfcaia.com NO. DATE ~OB~S~ON 1 ~/16/D2 ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARy REVIEW 2 11/13/02 ISSUED FOR APPE~)VALS 3 12/11/02 ISSUED FOR FU~G 4 )1/07/03 I~V. FOR COORD~REJSSUED FOR FILING 8 270§70~ ~,%tED FOB FLI~ Omnipoint COMMUI~CATION$ INC. os on o§ent for 0mnipoint hcilities Network 2, LLC. 11 Highpoinf Brive, Woyne, NJ 07470 MATTITUCK 12585 SOUND AVENUE MA1-DTUCK, N.Y. 11952 LH3-411-B EQUIPMENT PLAN, SOUTH ELEVATION, ANTENNA DETALS & TYPICAL EQUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS 1~ NO.: 09/16102 02-4756 DRAWING NO.: SCAT..~ AS NOTED DI~_WN ~Y: E.C. NM SP-2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: March 28,2006 Michael Verity, Chief Building Inspector Victor L'Eplattenier, Site Plan Rev~ Omni point Communications Inc. c/ County Rd. 48, Mattituck SCTM: 1000-141-3-38.1 Zone:LI Planning Department staff made a Final inspection of the above site on March 24, 2006. All elements of the approved site plan dated 9/16/02, and last revised 3/3/04,including addendum plan modifications AD-1 and AD-2,dated June 9,2004 are now complete. The Planning Board therefore recommends that the Certificate of Occupancy be issued. The applicant should be reminded that proper care of the flag suspended on the monopole be maintained. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Choir RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 15, 2004 Mr. Lawrence C. Rb Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11740 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Dear Mr. R6: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 14, 2004: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to erect a 100' flagpole and affix to it public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone; and WHEREAS, George L. Penny, Inc. is the owner of the property known and designated as 12585 Sound Avenue, located on the s/s/o County Road 48, approximately 50' w/o Westphalia Avenue, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2003, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals reversed the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval as described under Appeal Number 5357; and WHEREAS, on January 29, 2004, a formal application for approval of this site plan was submitted; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2004, the Architectural Review Committee reviewed the site plan and acknowledged that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment; and WHEREAS, on March 6, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.6, performed a review of this unlisted action, and as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted a Negative Declaration on April 13, 2004; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2004, the Mattituck Fire District found one (1) fire well is required and the Planning Board has accepted this recommendation; and Omnipoint Communications, Inc. - Paqe Two - 6/15/04 WHEREAS, on May 28, 2004, the Southold Town Engineer reviewed and approved the proposed drainage and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation; and WHEREAS, said plan modifications are noted in the Town Engineer's report dated June 14, 2004; and WHEREAS, on June 11,2004, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed, certified the site plan, and submitted his report to the Planning Board on June 14, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by William Collins, AIA, and certified by Neil Alexander MacDonald, dated August 16, 2002 and last revised March 3, 2004 including addendum plan modifications AD-',. & AD-2 dated June 9, 2004, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans with ,~he following condition and subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the bui!'.Jing permit: 1 ) All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within property boundaries. The lighting must meet the Town Code Requirements. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan, one for your records, and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your Building Permit. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ouse Chairperson encl. CC: Tax Assessors Building Department Town Engineer/Town Highway Supt. Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 02/19/04 Transaction(s): Application Fees ReceiptS: 1735012 Subtotal $1,231.20 Check#: 1735012 Total Paid: $1,231.20 FEB 2 0 2004 $0uthold Town Planning B0aM Name: Clerk ID: Omnipoint, Communications Inc T Mobile 12920 Se 38th St Bellevue, WA 98006 LINDAC Internal ID: 89799 SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED / NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE zomg_.r zoo3: HAMLET: / ~,~;r~/t-r,~ TEL# ( ) TEL# ON ~,, r~q ACRES PARCEL IN DATE ,.PILE-SUBMISSION WRI.t'I'k;N REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERRRICE ~/IT'HIN 30 DAYS OF WKITIEN REQUEST) __._/ / INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: -- PRE-WORK SESSION: ~ / ~/. / APPLICATION RECEIVED: v^Y~mNT P, ZCErv'~D: ],~x4ou~rr RECErV~:$ /2 3 FEE AMOUNT: ($300.X eA. =$ /2. aO,.---D($.05X4..;LIi~e~/,,~SF__$ NEW APPLICATION WORKg~$SION 0V1THIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT) APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS_~vTrHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) __ ~ION m~cEr~D: - ~_~?/ ~~: ~Pa2: UNLIS~D: ~ } ' . ' ~ ~//~/~ ' RECE VED DATE REVI. EWED DA~ D~INAGE PLAN: / / / / ~N: / / / / [LIGHTING P~N: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ...... ~ / / / EEFERRED FOR ~PROV~S: ~ONING BO~D OF APP~S: ~OARD OF TRUSTEE'S: BUILDING DEPARTME~ CERTIFICATION: TOWN ENGINEER ~PROV~: ~CHITECTU~ REVIEW COMMI~EE: DEP.OF T~SPORTATION: I SUFFOLK COUN~ DEPT OF H~LTH: SUFFOLK COUN~ DEPARTMENT OF P~NING: =IRE COMMISSIONERS: · /__/__ / ~BOARD APPROVALS PREPARED: ~ ,_ '--~__ CONDITIONAL FINAL' / / FiNAL..~ //.. [DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DE PLANNING BOARD M~EMB · BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman W/LLIAM J. CREMERS I~NNETI/L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATKAM, JR. RICHARD G. WARD PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee APPLICATION FOE CONSIDEP, ATION OF A SITE New Change of Use .. Re-use Extension x Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. lO00- 141 03 38.1 Penny Lumber 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 4 Sylvan Way, ~Parsippany, NJ 07054 973-397-4800 SCTM#: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: George L. Penny, Inc. Agent or Pemon responsible for application: (Attorney for App]icant) Lawrence C. Re' Munley, Meade, Nielsen ~ E'e' Address: 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York lz/~u Telephone: 631-425-4100 Site plans prepared by: License No. William F. Collins, AIA Nei] A. MacDonald, K.A. 026944 Address: Telephone: 10-1Technoloq.y Drive, Setauket, NY 11733 631-689-8450 Page 2 Plannln0 Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YOI~ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Mary Moran . /is employed at being duly sworn, deposes and says math¢~ Omnipoint Communications Inc. in the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the above properS, or that he is the Agent for the Lessee of the ~m~X~Ye~Y~Y~zo~fsX, XXiTRtx. Owner retie) (Specify whether ~J~C~e~t~p~r corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown onthe Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; 'that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance With the plans submit-ted. Signed ('Part;~r or C.~p~orat~ (~ic~r arid TIt:le) Applicant/Owner' s Agent. Page $ Piannlr~ Board Site Plan Application Lot size: 3.8:~ acresTptal Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Lt. I nd ' 1. Zoning District ~ Existing Use of Ste Existing Office' and Industrial Buildings ~! !~y. ' Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Erect lO0-foot flag?cie: affix public utility wlrPle~s t~l~rnmm~_!nication Panel antennas thereto; install related equipment cabinets at base of pole on O'x 20~ poured concrete slah_: install electric transfnrmer at ha~ nf ,nnl~ on 8' x 8" poured concrete pad; install CSC Telco cabinet on Strongwell Pull Box. OrossFIoorAmaofExlstingStructure(s) * see page S-P1 of Site Plan for summary Gross Floor Area of P~oposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lc;t for Parking (wt~e~'e applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees -Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVAT/ON 0£ CONST£UCTION) MAYBE UNDE£TAKEN UN[IL APP£OVAI OF S/TE PLAN BY PI-ANN/NO BOARD. V/OLATO£S APE SUBJECT TO P£OSECUT/ON. The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts interest on the pa~t of town o[~icers and employees, The purpose cE this form in to pco¥ide information which ca~-- alert the town o£ possible con[licb~ of interest and al/ow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. you ace ~pply~ng In the n~nt~ o~ someone el~e cc Tax g~ievanc~ (re "Other," name tbs activity.) Site Plan Application NO X appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space The town oEfleec cc employee o.~ bis or her spouse, sibling, D~SCRIPTION OF RELATIONSIIIP Electrical Specifications Azimuth Beamwidth Elevation Beamwidth Gain Polarization Port-to-Port Isolation Front-to-Back Ratio Electrical Downtilt Options VSWR Connectors Power Handling Passive Intermodulation Lightning Protection RR65-19-XXDP DualPol* Polariza0on 1850 MHz - 1990 MHz 65° 4.5° 18.5 dBi (16.4 dBd) Dual Unear Slant (± 45°) >30dB >30dB 0°, 2°, 4°, 6° 1.35:1 Max 2; 7-16 DIN (female) 250 Waits CW < -150 dBc [2 x 20 W (+ 43 dBm)] Chassis Ground RF CONNECTOR~- Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (L x W x D) Rated Wind Veloci[y Equivalent Flat Plate Area Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Weight 72 in x 8 in x 2.75 in (183 cmx 20.3 cmx 7.0 cm) 150 mph (241 knVhr) 4ft2 (.37 m~) 115 lbs (512 N) 40 lbs (176 N) 23 lbs (10.4 kg) Mounting Options MTG-PO0-10, MTG-S02-10, MTG-DXX-20*, MTG-CXX-IO*, MTG-C02-10, MTG-TXX-IO* Note: *Modelnumber shown represents a series ofproducts. See Mounb'ng Options se(YJon for specific model number. I~ttem$ Elevation Elevation Elevation Elevation 0° DowntJlt 2' Downtilt 4° Dow~lilt 6" Downtilt Revised 04/05/02 +1 770.582.0555 ext. 5310, Fax +1 T70.729.0036 www. emswtrele~s.com Site Le.qend Proposed Site On Air Site On Air Coverage (in Vehicle-84 dBm) Proposed Coverage (in Vehicle-84 dBm) Photographs of Abutting Properties AT Town of Southold 12855 Sound Avenue Mattimck, NY (Suffolk County) Prepared for: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 21 Keyland Court Bohemia, NY 11716 Prepared by: DMS Consulting Services, Inc. 560 Hudson Street Suite 3 First Floor Hackensack, New Jersey 07601 Tel: (201) 229-1550 October 2, 2003 DMS CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. Location: 125855 Sound~venue, Mattituck, NY OCI/Li13411 t. Taken of Pem~y Floor Center: 4250 CR48 2. Taken from Westphalia & CR48. looking SW at house on Westphalia. Location: 125855 Sound~venue, Mattituck, NY OCVLII3411 3. View of adjacent property to Penny Floor Center; 625 Westphalia Ave. 4. Taken of adjacent property of Penny Floor Center; 170 Westphalia Ave. Location: 125855 Soun~l~venue, Mattituck, NY OCI/LI13411 5. Taken from front of 12505 Sound Avenue, looking North 6. Taken from the driveway of 12425 Sound Avenue, looking North. Location: 125855 Sound~venue, Mattituck, NY OCLrLI13411 7. l~aken of adjacent property, looking West; 3690 CR48. 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically exper[ in environmental analysis, in addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site, By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action, It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project:~ Part I ~ Part 2 r-]Part 3 upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. []B. could have effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect Although the project a significant for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* []C. The project may result in one or more large and import, ant impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared, *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Omnipoint Communications, Inc ( Penny's Lumber) Name of Action Southold Town Plarming Board Name of Lead Agency Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chair Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency ~nature of R~ponsible Officer in Lead Agency website Title of Responsible Officer Signatbre o¥ Preparer (if d~erent from responsible officer) 04/12/04 Date Page 1 of 21 14-16-2 (9/95) - 7c 617.20 Append~ A State Environment QualityReview FULL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be tectmieally expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 [] Part3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. * [] C. The project may result in one more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Omnipoint Communications, Inc. wireless communications facility Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date Revised from original dated 9/23/03 I LI-13-411 ~RT 1 - PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAr will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Omnipoint Communications, Inc. wireless communications facility LOCATION OF ACTION (include Street Address, Municipality and County) 12855 Sound Avenue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPeNSER BUSINESS TELEPHONE Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 631-218-5000 ADDRESS 21 Keyland Court CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE NY 11716 Bohemia BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER (if differant) George L. Penny, Inc. ADDRESS 12855 Sound Avenue CITY/PO STATE ] ZIP CODE Mattituck NY I 11952 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: The installation of a wireless communications facility consisting of a 100'-0" foot free-standing stealth monopole structure (flagpole design) to be located within a leased :~1400 square foot compound that will be enclosed by a 6-foot chain link fence. The antenna facility would be located within the interior of the flagpole structure. The facility will be supported by three (3) outdoor equipment cabinets located south of thc monopole structure within the fenced campound' The facility will require power and telephone to be supplied by local providers. Please complete Each Question - Indicate N.A if not applicable. A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Residential (suburban) [] Forest [] Agriculture [] Other~ 2. Total acreage of project area: N/A acres~ Approximate Acreage Presently Meadow or Bmshland (Non-agriculture) ~ acres Forested ~ acres Agriculture (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) __ acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) ~ acres Water Surface Area ~ acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) ~ acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? CuB-cut and fill land, eentlv slooin~2 a. Soil drainage: [] Well drained 100% of site [] Moderately well drained [] Rural (non-farm) After Completion acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres % of site [] Poorly drained % of site b. If any agriculture land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) Are there bedrock outcropping on project site? [] yes [] no a. What is the depth to bedrock? ~ (In feet) Revised from original dated 9/23/03 2 LI-13411 [] 0-10% 100% 5. Approximate pementage of proposed project site with slopes: [] 15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places: [] Yes [] No3 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? >4 (in feet)4 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [] Yes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes [] No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [] Yes [] No According to Site visit- property is fully developed. Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [] Yes [] No Describe [] 10-15% __% [] No 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain ~ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [] Yes [] No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary ~ 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name: nones 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes [] No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [] Yes [] No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [] Yes [] No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes []No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [] Yes [] No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or contxolled by project sponsor 4-1400 sq.feet. (leased compound space.) b. Project acreage to be developed. ±1400 sq.ft initially; 4.1400 sq.ft ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped N/A acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-straet parking spaces existing N/A; proposed 0* g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 100'-0' height; width, j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 0_ ff. length. (height of monopole) Revised fi'om original dated 9/23/03 3 LI-13-411 How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0.0 tons/cubic yards Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [] Yes [] No [] N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ~ b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres' 5. Will any nature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed bY this pr°ject? [] Yes [] No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1_ months, (including demoliti°n). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). year. [] Yes [] No c. Approximate completion date of final phase __ month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No Number of jobs generated: during construction 5; at, er project is complete _0. 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0. 11. Will project require relocation ofany projects or facilities? [-]Yes []No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type ~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain ~ 15. Is project or any portion ofproject located in a 100 year flood plain? []Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any waste not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If yes, explain~ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [] Yes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce ordem (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _0 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain [] Yes []No [] Yes [] No [] No [] No [] Yes [] No Revised from original dated 9/23/03 4 LI-13411 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board [] Yes [] No City, Town, Village Planning Board [] Yes [] No City, Town Zoning Board [] Yes [] No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Local Agencies [] Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies [] Yes [] No State Agencies [] Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes [] No Type ~ermit Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate decision required: [] zoning amendment [] zoning variance []special use permit [] subdivision [] new/revision of master plan [] resource management plan [] other ~ [] site plan 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? LI - Light Industrial 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted bY the present zoning? Parcel is currently developed as a lumber yard 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? None proposed 5. What is the maximum potential developmeAt °f the site if devel°ped as permit~ced by the pr°p°sed z°ning? None proposed 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius °f pr°p°sed acti°n? LI~ R-40~ I-IB~RO - retail shopping~ marina~ eateries~ one-f~milv residential, aRricultural 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within ¼ mile? [] Yes [] No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [] Yes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certifyflha~ the, I~formation provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/~ons~r .N,~r~. O~noi~t-- ~' ~tions, Inc. Date 12/30/2003 Signature ~ A~/~ ~t~/~/ ~.~//;~JDMS Consulting Services, Inc. Title Planner . . If the action i~s i~ihe Coastal area, and y~u ar~a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Revised fi.om original dated 9/23/03 5 LI-13-411 I The subject parcel lies within an induslxial zoning district. The current use of the property is that of an active lumberyard containing an office building, storage buildings, heavy-duty equipment and related supplies. Surface materials within the developed parcel consist of both gravel and impervious surfaces. The addition of the proposed action would not alter the existing conditions of the primary use. The proposed fenced compound area would be placed within the developed portion of the property not causing any new soil disturbance or removal of vegetation. 2 Reference: United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Survey, Suffolk County. This unit is made up of level to gently sloping area that have been cut and filled for nonfarm uses. Slopes Range from 1 to 8percent... (page 68) 3 Reference: National Register Listings in Suffolk County inclusive of State Listings. Two (2) properties are noted within Mattituck: 1. Richard Cox House - Mill Road 2. Andrew Gildersleeve octagonal Building - Main Road and Love Lane Given the nature of the proposed action, an review from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation was initiated in January 2003. A response of No Effect was received dated October, 16, 2003. 4 Reference: United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Survey, Suffolk County. Cut and Fill land is generally associated with Carver and Plymouth soils. (page 68). Depth to seasonal high water table - Table 5, page 34. Both Carver and Plymouth soils list the water table as greater than 4 feet. Noted for the CuB Series, it is not included within Table 5, because the characteristics are too variable to estimate. 5 The nearest body of water is the Mattituck Creek located north-northeast of the subject parcel. The activity currently existing within the subject parcel nor the action proposed would have an effect on this body of water. 6 The proposed communication facility is unmanned and would not require parking or disturb the current off- street parking available for the patrons, employees and on-site equipment. Revised from original dated 9/23/03 6 LI-I 3-411 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. In identifying impacts, consider long term, shor~ term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact, tf impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? .o [] YES [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes [] [] [ Yes [] [] DYes [] [] Yes [] [] []Yes Page 11 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts; None Known Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) Specific land forms: None Known Impact on Water Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) []NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: [] r"'lY E]No r-]Yes E]No [] []Yes r~No I None Known Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 o A 10 Yo increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: None Known [] []Yes ~No [] DYes [] []Yes [] []Yes [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes [] [] []Yes []No [] [] DYes []No [] [] []Yes [~No Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed {project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change DYes []No I-lYes r~No I-lYes ina []Yes ina I-l~es iNa []Yes r~No r-]Yes Page 13 of 21 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change 6. Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~NO r==~ YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: None Known [] [] F1 [] ~]Yes []No [] I-lyes [.o [] []Yes []No [] F'-I Yes [~]No [] I-lYes [No IMPACT ON AIR Will Proposed Action affect air quality? [~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million 8TU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: None Known [] [] [] []Yes r~No [] []Yes [~No [] []Yes [~]No [] [] []Yes r~No [] [] r"l Yes [~No [] []Yes r~No IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~'1 NO []YES Examples that wou~d apply to column 2 Red uction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] []Yes Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Other impacts: None Known 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] OYes []No 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? I NO nyEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species, Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: INone Known IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? [] NO FI YES Examples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ~'] ~'~ OYes []No [] Fi OYes []No [] [] OYes []No Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 1 Small to Moderate Impact 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) [~lNo []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change BYes [~]No ]Yes [] No ]Yes []No [].e []Yes [].o IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. [] [] [] [] [] [] ]]Yes [~]No DYes [No DYes []No Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: INone Known 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change r~ r-'l Yes []No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? [] No []yEs Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: INone Known IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g )? [~NO r'"~ YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. INone Known [] []Yes []No [] []Yes [~]No [] []Yes r~No Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: INone Known [] I--lYe~ I~.o [] I-lyes [] F-'~ Yes F~INo []Yes [~'] No [] [=-]Yes r~No Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [] NO [] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action w01 result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: None Known , IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [.O []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: None Known NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? F~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: None Known Page 18 of 21 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change [] []Yes []No [] []Yes [~]No [] r~Yes [~No [] r'l Yes []No [] DYes ~INo [] DYes ~'lNo [] []Yes []No [] DYes []No [] DYes [~No [] []Yes [~'1 No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? []NO []YES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied natural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste, Other impacts: None Known , IMPACT ON GROWll-I AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? ["O I--lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] [] [] []Yes [] r~Yes [~No [] []Yes r~No [] []Y~ [.o [] [] [] [] []Yes r~No [] []Y~ r;'l.o [] []Yes [~]No [] []ye~ [] []Yes [~No [] []Y~ Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: None Known I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ~lYes [] [] F'~ Yes [~No [] [] r~Yes F~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? []NO If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact occurring The duration of the impact Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value Whether the impact can or will be controlled The regional consequence of the impact Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. None known because the location selected permits this use for the proposed action and is current in a light industrial use. Page 21 of 21 ~ O0~/OD2 March Il, 200~ 3500 Sun'~c I-fighway Suit~ D203 Or.It Ri~er, NY 11739 Ommpoint Communicauon Inc. Now Eqmpmem on Grade and N~w Flagpole 12595 Sound Aveeno, Mattitu~k, NY 11952 0mmpoint Site No. LI-13-411-A W'FC Project No. 02-4756 De~r Mr LaPasota. Willmm F. Collins AL~ Architects, LLP (WFC) visiuxl tho above referenced site o~ February 1, 2006 to conducl a ~ review ofthe eeeently completod work relating to the antenna and equipment installalian project drawings prepared by our orifice, i~.~ueat on .april 22, 2004 for u~ captioned Omaipoint Cellular Comm,mications Facility. It is WFC's opinion that all visually verLfiablc work that has been completed at ~he site has been executed in compliance with the Building Code of New York State and Zoning Board of Approvals. Accordingly, we have executed the apl~:~ria~ revisions ~ o~r drawings and are issuiug them for "Record Purposes". Addfliomdly, WFC was present ~ the time of the concrete pour conducted on August 19, 2005. lu.~ll~iion of anchor bolt and. rebar cage was in accordance with the flagpole foundation design~t and prcgan~d by PennSmurnit Tubular, LLC, dated February 24, 2004 ffyou have any questions, picasc do not hcs~r~act our o~ice. R~gards, Neil A. MaeDomld, AIA Partner cc: A Cillo, T-Mcdml~. M. Lindsay, WFC -- , .Mobile- V'~ot L'Eplattenier Please review the faxed A/E cer'JficatJon letter ar~[ ICC me know when yo~ wil go to the site so I can possibly meet you out there PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMEBS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 June 21,2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Lawrence C. Re, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Dear Mr. Re: RE: Omnipoint Communication, Inc. Enclosed are the following extra site plan maps for your files: / 6 maps dated 9/16/02 Very truly yours, ~mon~~) Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. T T ' ~ /~ LINE OF EXrSTINO PAVEM/~N ~% PITCH GRADES AND CONTOURS WITHIN NEW ~l~ ~ ~ S~ P~ COMPOUND TO NEW DRYWELL MATTITUCK NORTEL TEC~OLOOIES/~S PROJ~TS INC. .............................. AS NOrD MA~I~CK, NY 11952 (3) EQUIPMENT LI-1341CAB~ETSI-B & {6)ANTE~A 02~7~61OB NO. ~ D~W~GAD_i~ER ~V -- PROVIDE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY NO. 1184 TRAFIC BEARINC FRAME AND ORATE COVER, (~(PICAL) PAVEMENT 24"0 PRECABT CONC, RING $'-0" CLEAN SAND & GRAVEL COLLAR W/ FILTRATION MESH AROUND ALL RINGS PRECAST CONC. TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB REINFORCED PRECAST CONCRETE STORM LEACHING RING 8"x12" PRECAST CONCRETE FOOTING GROUND WATER DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: (2" DESIGN RAINFALL RETENTION) KEY U~E t~ATl~lAL AREA (S.F.) X RUNOFF COEF. = EOUIV DRAIN DESIGN EQUIV. BRAIN DESIGN X DESIGN RAINFALL = DESIGN VOL C.F, EQUIPMENT CONCRETE 521 S.F. X 1.0 = 321 X 0.17 = 55 C.F, STORAGE REQUIRED AREA USE (1) DRYWELL WITH ONE 5' HIGH 1 SUB-TOTAL = 55 C.F. x 10' DIA. RING EA. = 3 V.F. STO. CAPACFh' OF 10' D]A, RING = 68.42 CF/VF AREA 1 MIN. V.f. OF STORAGE REQUIRED = .80 V.F. (~) STORM DRYWELL SCALE - 1/4"1'-0' Omnipoint MATTITUCK COMMUNICATIONS INC. NORTEL TECHNOLOGIES/OCS PROJECTS SCALE: 12585 SOUND AVENUE (3) EQUIPMENTCABINETS&(6)ANTENNA JO"O I 7 AS NOTED MATTITUCK, NY 11952 LI-13411-B 02-4756 AD-2 ~IUNLEY~ l~IEADE~ NIELSEN & t~l~ (631) 425-4104 June 14, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bruno Semon Re: Site Plan Application Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM # 1000: Section: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 38.1 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Chair Woodhouse: We represent Omnipoint Communications, Inc. with respect to the above-captioned Site Plan Application. We are in receipt of the Mattituck Fire District's correspondences dated April 15, 2004, and May 21, 2004, seeldng the right to locate a fire well built to Mattituck Fire District Specifications in the project area. On June 10, 2004, representatives from Omnipoint Communications Inc. met at the project site with John Harrison, Fire District Manager, and a representative from a local drilling company to discuss the location of the well and other details. On information and belief, the parties agreed that the fire well would be located within the public right of way of Route 48, therefore no revision to the Site Plan should be required to comply with the Fire District's request. In addition, we are in receipt of a correspondence dated May 28, 2004, from the Town Engineer, James A. Richter. Omnipoint intends to comply with the Town Engineer's request for submission ora structural analysis prior to actual construction of the flagpole. With respect to the drainage issue, William F. Collins, AIA Architects, LLP, has provided a partial Site Plan addendum to the Town Engineer for review. On information and belief, the Town Engineer has agreed that the addendum addresses the drainage issue to his satisfaction. Copies of the addendum will be provided to the Planning Board. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIFe~LSEN & RE ~ Jacaly]n R. F~emlng J JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765-1366 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I I971 Re~ OmniPoint Communications, Inc. Proposed Telecommunications Tower SCTM #: 1000-141-03-38.1 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: I have received correspondence from WFC Architects regarding the above referenced project. The enclosed plan modification and drainage details has satisfactorily addressed the concerns listed in my May 28, 2004 Report. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office. cc; Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) FAX TRANSMI-I-I-AL WILLIAM ]ff. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, L L I' TO: FAX NO: FROM: DATE: RE: PROJECT NO: NO. OF PAGES: James Richter (63 I) 765-1366 Paul La Pasota June 9, 2004 T-Mobile @ Mattituck- Site No, LI-I 3-41 I-B SCTM#: 1000-141-03-38.1 02-4756 3 (including Cover) DOCUMENTS TRANSMITTED: (I) Set ofaddendums for the above referenced site COMMENTS: .lames, In response co your letter regarding site drainage or new work we have prepared the amched addendums for your review and commenc. If'you have any questions please call my self or Glen DeMarino ac exc I Thank you, Paul La Pasotaext 141 24"e PRECAST CONC. RING 3'-0" CLEAN SAND & DRAVEL COLLAR W/ FILTRATION MESH -- GROUND WATER (~) STORM DRYWFLL SC. ALE, - 1V[UN-LEY~ MEADE~ NIELSEN & l~l~ June 9, 2004 VIA UPS Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Members of the Planning Board Town of Southold Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 '. (631) 425-4100 $outhold Town Planning Boara Rc: Site Plan Application Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM # 1000: Section: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 38.1 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattimck, New York 11952 Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board: Enclosed herewith are the certified mail receipts, the signed green return receipts and the Affidavit of Posting for the above site. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to communicate with the undersigned. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN RE Jacalyn R. Fleming JF:cp Enclosures S~ephen Pawl i k 550 South Drive ;NStt~ NY 11952 7003 1680 0007 4789 6051 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reveree so that we Can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, or on the front if space pan~its. 1. Article ~dressed to: Town of 5outhold Board of Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 D. Isdelivery If YES, enter delivery 3. Service Type ~/[] Certified Mail r-I Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. Adicle Number {~=,,=,;,=, ~om se~vk:e/abe/) · PS Fo~ 3811, ~gU~ ~1 7003 0500 0004 Domestic Return Receipt 3445 6030 102595-02-M-1540 · Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Ar[ic~e Addressed to: Diane & Josephine Cotugno 220 East Mill Road Mattituck, NY 11952 3. Service Type Certified Mail [~ Registered [] Express Mail [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] ¥ 2. Article Number (Tm,~rf~ms~ice/abel) 7003 1680 0007 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domes~c Return Receipt 4789 6112 · Co~plete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete item 4'if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Pdnt your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the roailpieca, or on the front if space permits. George L. Penny Inc. Main Road P.O. Box 2067 Greenport, NY 11944 2. Article Number i PS if~or~ ~1~1, ~o~ 2'001 D. Is delivery address different If YES, enter dellv~ 3. Service Type ~ Certified Mail [] Registered [] Insured Mail [] Express Mail [] Return Receipt for Merchandise · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Independent Group Home Living Program Inc. 62 Pine Street East Moriches, NY 11840 Signature [] Agent [] Received by ( Printed Name) Is delive~ address different from item 17 If YES, enter delivery edd~ss below: [] NO 3. Service Type Y~] Certified Mail 0 Express~Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7003 1680 0007 4789 6044 2. Article Number ~Transfer from service label) 7B03 1680 0007 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic,Return Receipt 4789 6099 102595~J2-M-1540 Domestic Return Receipt · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpieca, or on the front if space permits. 1. ArticleAddmssed to: Robert Olmsted Box 346 1220 Westphalia Road MAttituck, NY 11952 ~ address different from item t ? [] Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [] No 3. Service Type [ Certified Mail [] Express Mail Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2. Article Number 7003 0500 0004 3445 6023 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Griffin's LLC 825 Pacific Street Box 445 MAttituck, NY 11952 B. Received b If YES, enter delivery address below: [] Agent [] Addressee Yes [] No [] Express Mail [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] C.O.D. 7003 1680 0007 4789 5993 102595-02-M-1540 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3, Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space ~p.~rmits. P,0. Box 645 Mattituck, NY 11952 A. Signature X ~'~(~1~/~'[ '~.24-.~.-~vJ~r-I Addressee B. Received by ( Printed Name) _ [ EL Da~e of~Oelivery D, I$ del~ addl~ different flom Eern 17 [] Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: [] No 2. Alticie Number (Transfer from se~vlce 7003 1680 0007 4789 6082 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 1 ~2595-02-M-1540 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addmsssd to: Harry G. Charkow & Wife P.O. Box 215 Mattituck, NY 11952 2. Adicle Number (T~ansfer from service label) A. Signature [] Agent X [] Addressee B. Received by (Pdnted Name) . C..Date of Delivery D. Isdeliveryaddmssdiffemnt fl'om item 17 [] Yes If YES, enter delive~/~ddress below: [] No / / 3. ervice Type ~ Certified Mail [] Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. OYes ,4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 7003 1680 0007 4789 6105 PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-92-M-1540 · Complete items :1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired, · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: Diane Cotugno & James King 220 East Mill Road Mattituck, NY 11952 '~2. r~,o~e Nu~~ ~. Sign y/v~l~t~/~ [] Addressee B/Received t:~( Printed Name) D. Is deli~ add~ d~t ~m fram 1 ? ' ~ Yes If YES, enter de[ive~ add~ ~low: 3. Service Type I~ Certified Mail [] Express Mail i-1 Registered [] Return Rsceipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra F~e) n Yes 7003 1680 0007 4789 6006 Domestic Return Receipt · Complete items 1,2, and 3, Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Pdnt your name and address on the reveme so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addms~d to: Paraskevi Kontoreros 1095 Westphalia Road Mattituck, NY 11952 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) [] Agent D. Is delivery If YES, eUter~ ~delivery address baiow: 3. Service Type ~ Certified Mall 0 Express Mail [] Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. Restdsted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 7003 0500 0004 3445 6016 PS Form 381 1, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595~)2-M-1540 · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Detivery is desired, · Print your name~and address on the reverse so that we can if~turn the card to you. · Attach this card 1~ the beck of the maiipiece, or on the front if ~pace permits. 1, Article Addressed ~: Alfred E. Bouffard Maple Lane P.O. Box 802 Mattituck, NY 11952 Signature [] Agent I-3 Addressee B. Received b D. is daiive~ address different frorn Item 1' i--I Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [] No 3. Service Type  CertLfied Mall [] Express MaiL Registered [] Return Receipt for Merchandise [] Ensured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes 2, Adicle Number (Transfer from service label) 7003 1680 0007 4789 6075 PS Form 381 1, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the ma~lpiese, or on the front if space permits. Robert Boasi 12425 Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 I 2..~ticle Number 102595-D2'M'15~uI (Transfer from service lebel) [ .~ ~-k~[ ( ii PS Form 381 1, August 2001 D. Isdaiive~yaddmssdiffemntffomiteml? []~ If YES, enter daiive~y address below: [] ~ 3, Service Type [] Insured Mail [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted Deliver'J? (~J~ra Fee) [] Yes 7003 1680 0007 4789 6068 Domestic Ratum Receipt i 5_~9~-~-1540 r,- i E~ Return R~ept Fee "'"7 '~ "" Hem / ~ (Endomeme~t Required) - ~ ResMcted DelNery Fee =O (En~or~ement Required) '~ I$ ~'-/~1 postage RetUrn Rec, iept I=e~ ~ (EndOrsm~ent ReqUired) ~ ; ~_.~ ~:~:':~, ....... ~.~.~.~:....Lo..q. ................ ~-~ ............ ~_ rtl ~l ©F~-~AL USE rtl ~ I~° ff~ ~.~.~ iZv~e~/,' z,~e I [ .............. :.......~..~.~ ~ ~o~ j ~, ~, ~ - .......... ~ ............................ OFFICIAL USE 1 I ~. "75 / m OFF C[AL 9,. :3o /.-, :7 5 ,, AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property km 125855 Sound Avenue~ Mattituck New York SCTM# 1000-141-3-38.1 Southold Town Plannin~ ~oara by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on June 14, 2004 I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on June 4, 2004 Jacalyn R. Fleming Your Name (print) /') Ah -- Signature ~ {J 3 36 No~h New Yo~k Avenue Hunt~ng~on, New Yo~k 11743 Address June 9, 2004 Dat~F~ ~~t~ N/o~a ry Public ~ WILSON / ~11~/I1~ ~late of New Yo~k PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 11:30 a.m., Fri, 6/11/04 Re: Proposed Site Plan for omnipoint Communications/Penny SCTM#s: 1000-141-3.38.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, June 14, 2004, 6:00 p.m. 14:01 FAX 16316898459 WILLIAM F COLLINS FAX TRANSMITTAL ~001 WILLIAM ~. COLLIN~ AIA AR C H I T E C T S. L L P TO: FAX NO: FROM: DATE: RE: PROJECT NO: NO. OF PAGES: Mr. Bruno Semon, Planner - Town of Southold (631) 765-3136 "~,~; - (~;~ Thomas I~ Turkel, AIA June 14, 2004 Omnipoint Communications Inc., proposed Mattituck Site @ 12585 Sound Ave 02-4756 3 (Including Cover) DOCUMENTS TRANSMITTED: Copies of Signed, Sealed partial site plan and detail of storm water drywell COMMENTS: Above items provided per your request of Ms. Jacelyn Fleming, Esq. Munley Meade Neilson & Re' Cc: J. Fleming 10-1 T~CHNOLOG'Y DRIVE 5 ~TAIJK~T, NY 11733 VOICe: ~31 -(~9-84~ pAX: 631-g89-84~ It'l-Ilf './/WWW.WFCA[A.COM NOTE: m ~~-- PROVIDE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY NO. ~ 11B4 TRAFIC BEARING FRAME AND GRATE COVER. (I~PICAL) i,./~--- RNISHED PAVEMENT ~' J = , · ~ RI[INF. PRECAST CONC. 'R~FiC DP~JN~ CALCULATK~ (2' DESIGN RAINFALL RE'fENTION) AREA ($.F.) X RUNOFF COEF. = £Q~JN DRNN DESIGN KEY I~ MA~=FL~L EQUIV. DRNN DESIGN X DESIGN RAINFALL -OESIGN VOL C,F, ~REA LIGE (1) DRYWELL WITH ONE ~' HIGH ~ SUG-TOTAL I AREA 1 MIN. V.F. or STORAGE REQUIRED Q~)STORM DRYW~IL MATTITUCK ~Omnipoint i io DP~JN~ CALCULATK~ (2' DESIGN RAINFALL RE'fENTION) KEY ~ MA~=FLAL AREA ($,F.) X RUNOFF COEF. = £Q~JiV ORNN DESIGN rroF~JLF-AO~N~POOL~ EQUIV, DRNN DESIDN X OESmN RAINFALL - DESIGN VOL C,F. ~REA USE (1) DRYWELL WITH ONE ~' HIGH i~IUNLEY~ I~IEADE~ NIELSEN & 1~ June 14, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 JUN 1 5 2004 Snuth01d Town Ptanain Ioar,q Attention: Mr. Bruno Semon Re: Site Plan Application Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM # 1000: Section: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 38.1 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Chair Woodhouse: We represent Omnipoint Communications, Inc. with respect to the above-captioned Site Plan Application. We are in receipt of the Mattituck Fire District's correspondences dated April 15, 2004, and May 21, 2004, seeking the fight to locate a fire well built to Mattituck Fire District Specifications in the project area. On June 10, 2004, representatives from Omnipoint Communications Inc. met at the project site with John Harrison, Fire District Manager, and a representative from a local drilling company to discuss the location of the well and other details. On information and belief, the parties agreed that the fire well- would be located within the public fight of way of Route 48, therefore no revision to the Site Plan should be required to comply with the Fire District's request. In addition, we are in receipt of a correspondence dated May 28, 2004, from the Town Engineer, James A. Richter. Omnipoint intends to comply with the Town Engineer's request for submission of a structural analysis prior to actual construction of the flagpole. With respect to the drainage issue, William F. Collins, AdA Architects, LLP, has provided a partial Site Plan addendum to the Town Engineer for review. On information and betel, the Town Engineer has agreed that the addendum addresses the drainage issue to his satisfaction. Copies of the addendum will be provided to the Planning Board. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIF~LSEN & RI~ L/ Jacalyn R. Fleming ~J Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: June 11, 2004 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Omnipoint Communications Location: 12585 Sound Ave., Mattituck SCTM# 1000 - Section 141- Block 3 - Lot 38.1 Date: September 16, 2002 Revised Date: March 03, 2004 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Wireless Communication Facility is a PERMITTED USE IN THIS LI DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Chief Building Inspector PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 3, 2004 Mr. Lawrence C. R6 Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11740 Re' Town Engineer and Fire District Response Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Commtmications, Inc. Located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Dear Mr. R6: Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated April 21, 2004 from the Mattituck Fire District and a letter dated May 28, 2004 from the Town Engineer. Please review the enclosed letters and respond in writing if in agreement with the request. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of thc Fire District and Town Engineer. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision A.S.A.P. to continue the site plan process. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. l:lilnlo ;~ glTIOn Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enO. P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 To: Mrs. Jacalyn Fleming From: Bruno Semon Fax: 425-4104 Paces: 6 including cover Phone: Date: June 3, 2004 Re: CC: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)- 765 - 1366 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN F SOUTHOLD~ NEW YORK 11971 2 t 2004 S0~th01d Town May 28, 2004 Re: OmniPoint Communications, Inc Proposed Telecommunications Tower 12855 Sound Ave, Mattituck SCTM #: 1000-141-03-38.1 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above referenced project. Due to the nature of the proposed site improvements, this report will only deal with the area of the proposed mobile communication equipment compound and "flagpole". Issues relating to the existing use and non-conformities of the site will be considered pre-existing and will not be referenced by my office without a specific or direct request from the Planning Board. It is recommended that all zoning related issues be reviewed by the Building Department prior to final site plan approvals. The proposed 100' high Monopole "Flagpole" is situated in the central area of the site. It has been located utilizing a minimum separation distance of 100' from all existing structures and the placement of this Monopole is considered satisfactory. A certified structural analysis by a Registered Design Professional in the State of New York with regard to the proposed monopole construction should be provided to the Planning Board for their records prior to actual construction. The Equipment Plan of sheet S-2 has a note indicating that an existing drain is to be relocated. The size and location of this existing drain should be verified and noted on the plan. Drainage calculations should be provided on the Site Plan to address the new slab areas and impervious surfaces proposed within the Tower Compound. The new drain should be increased in size and located to accommodate both the additional run-off generated by the new work and the original capacity of the existing drain. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) CC: S les A. Richter, R.A. I TTITUCK FIRE DISTR T PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK I 1952-0666 MARTIN L.GRIFFIN, SR. Chairman Norman A. Reilly, Jr., Vice Chairman James D. Roache Greg N. Tyler Jerome Zuhoskl May 21, 2004 Mr. Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board P O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 John A. Keogh, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer MAY 2 5 2004 Southold Town pk~nnin~ ~oar~ Re: SCTM# 1000-141-3-38.1 Dear Mr. Semon. In the second paragraph of the attached letter the wora "subdivision" was erroneously inserted it should have been "site plan", as in the first paragraph and the phrase "at a later date when roads and driveways have been established" will not apply in this situation. However the Board would like to reserve the right to locate the fire well. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Sincerely, Fire District Manager encl. Office (631.) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 I ATTITUCK FIRE DIST CT PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 MARTIN L.GRIFFIN, SR. Chairman Norman A. Rellly, Jr., Vice Chairman James D. Roache Greg N. Tyler Jerome Zuhoski John A, Keogh, Secretary Barbara Dickemon, Treasurer April15,2004 Mr. Victor L'Eplattenier Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town PI;, P O Box 1179 Southold, NY Dear Mr. At the Reg~ site plan That 1 on reserves the i been Thank you in lunications, Inc. Fire District Sincerely, John A. Keogh Secretary Encl. JAK/jch Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of June, 2004 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed site plan for~(George L. Penny, Inc., Owner of Land). The property is located 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-141-3-38.1 6:05 p.m. Proposed lot line change for Francis & Christena Doyen. The property is located on Hedge Street, approximately 410 feet north of Montauk Avenue, on Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-10-7-27.1 6:10 p.m. Proposed major conservation subdivision Zoumas at Bayview. The property is located on the north side of North Bayview Road, +/- 200' w/o Brigantine Drive, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-79-4-17.17 Dated: 5/17/04 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2004 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Suffolk Times TIMESREVIEW PAGE Bi P.O, Box 1179 5.3095 Route 25 ~outho~, NY 11271 Phone: (631) 765-1238 Fa~c (6:31) 765-3136 E-Mall: planningt~lso~h(;4d.org T~ The Suffolk Tlmii JFm(w Valarlm ,~3o~ ~ Fees= 2 "L IAdfor~/3/04EdWon~''~' I'tea~neMv Please pn~t the following legal ad In the 6/3/04 edition. Thanks. 6/14/04 Regular Meeting: 6;00 p,m, Omnllx)int CommuniGa6~ns Site Plan 8:05 p.m. D~mn Lot Line Change I~:1o p~.. Zo~ma~ at Iaay~w Maier Conearvation Sulxlivision Kindly acknc~vtedge receipt by signing below and faxing cover letter back. aecMved by:. Date: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of June, 2004 on the question of the following: 6:05 p.m. Proposed lot line change for Francis & Christena Doyen. The property is located on Hedge Street, approximately 410 feet north of Montauk Avenue, on Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of S~tolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-10-7-27.1 Dated: 5/17/04 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JUNE 3, 2004 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The New London Day P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold. NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-:~136 860/442-5443 .:: 860/442-2200 I~ Lo, iai Ad for ~ Ecfltion Valerie $c~paz/c.e~ 5/17/04 CC; Please pr~ the following legal ed/n your 6/3/04 ~ltlon, Thanks. 6:05 p.m. Do~y/~n Loi Erin Change Kindly acknow~ge, re~ .iIX by signing below and faxing cover letter ba~k. ~LANNING BOARD MEMBERS ~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RI C HARD CAGGIAN O ~, ~,~-- WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~ SIDOR '~.'~ P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of June, 2004 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed site plan for Omnipoint Communications (George L. Penny, Inc., Owner of Land). The property is located 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Su~dll~ County Tax Map Number 1000-141-3-38.1 / 6:05 p.m. P~,~oposed lot line change for Francis & Christena Doyen. The property is located on Hedge Street, approximately 410 feet north of Montauk Avenue, on Fishers Island, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-10-7-27.1 6:10 p.m. Proposed major conservation subdivision Zoumas at Bayview. The property is located on the north side of North Bayview Road, +/- 200' w/o Brigantine Drive, in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-79-4-17.17 Dated: 5/17/04 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 17th day of May, 2004 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road~ Southold, New York 6/14/04 Re.qular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Omnipoint Communications SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Francis & Christena Doyen SCTM#1000-10-7-27.1 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed major conservation subdivision Zoumas at Bayview SCTM#1000-79-4-17.17 Sworn to before me this ,/7 day of ~-~ ,2004. (/_//7 I~otary Public Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board JOYCE M. WlLKIN$ Notaw Publi=, State of New Y~ ~ero. 49_52246, .Suffolk Cou_nt~ m ~piree June 12, #6087 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Joan Ann Weber of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks successively, commencing on the 3rd day of June ,2004. #6087 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Joan Ann Weber of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks successively, commencing on the 3rd day of June ., 2004. Principal Clerk Sworn to before me this ~ 2004 CHRISTINA VOLINSKI NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OP I~l~W YOR~, No. 01 -VO6'tO~? OualUled in Su~(~n~¥ Commission Expires Fe~r~or¥ ~,, 1008 day of ~ ofSouthold, a public heafia~ will ~ held by Ihe Somhold Town l~annln~, Bo~xt, at the TOWn Hall, Main Roa~ Somhold, New Ya~k in said Town on the 14tla day ~' Jmle, 2~04 oo ttic questi~m of tl~ fotlowing 6:00 p.m. Pmpo~d site plan _ / ti I ' I' caw is located 50 wcst of Road 48, in M~i*~,-~, Town of South,- old, County of S~II~ Sta~ of New Yo~k. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 10~0-141-3-38.1 Map umber 10~0q0-7-27.1 . 6:10 p,-m. Proposal rrmjor of.No~th Bayview Road, +/- 200'.w/o ~s~mxq.~ ~ ~ suffo~ Stat~ of Nmn~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 May 11, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Lawrence C. Rb Muniey, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11740 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Located on the south side of County Road 48, approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Dear Mr. Rb: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 10, 2004: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone; therefore, be it RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board sets Monday, June 14, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. for a public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before '11:30 a,m, on Friday, June 11th, The si,qn and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing, Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, dhouse Chairperson Encl. Southold Town PlanninR Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the LI (Light Industrial) Zoning District; That the application is to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel. The property is located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, June 14, 2004 at 6:00 p.m. in the MeetinR Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southoid; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Omnipoint Communications (George L. Penny, Inc., Owner of Land) Date: 5/12/04 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I pemonally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature A~/dress Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: 11:30 a.m. Fri. 6/11/04 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications/Penny SCTM#s: 1000-141-3-38.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, June 14, 2004, 6:00 p.m. '§'~58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Chapter 58 NOT~CE OF pUBLIC HEAmNG § 58-1 § 58-1. Providing notice of publio hearings.. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 1~-27-1995 as L,L, No. 25-1995; Amendments noted where applleable.] § 58-1. Provialngnoticeof public hearings, Whenever the Code e~ll~ for a public hearing, this section slmli ~pply. up~o determining that an ap. pi/cation is comlJlote, the board or ~ommi~isn reviewing the sam6. shall fix ~ $1me and plac~ for a public hearing thereon, Tho board or cemmtssion reviewing an application'shali provlda ~r the giving of notice: ~ .By.causing a notice giving the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to .be published in the newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. ~ requiring the applicant to erst the sign provided by the tewn~ which shall be prominen .t~v dlzplayed on the premises fodng each public Or private sta~et whl~ the property involved in the application abuta,.gt~ing notice of the. application, the nature of the approval thereby and the time and pla~e of the' public thereon~ The atgn zbnll be ~t back not more than ton (10) feet groin the' prbl~t~ lil3. e. The. ~ z.h~ be ~m~t~tel~ pt~eeem._~ the cte~o .st- ue publls hom'ln~. .~e _app_ tk~_,.t ~r.~ ~.t. ~.me a~ ef~devlt:thst' C. By requf~mg the applicant to send notice to the owners or reoord of avery propert7 whlsh bbute and propef~7 whfch is across from anypublie or l~fVal~ street. 5801 SOUTHOLD CODE from the property included in the application. 8t~eh notice, shall be made by certified mail, r°turn receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public h~aring on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local assessment roll. The appli~nt or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. ' ' 'i 1~80~ GEORGE L. PENNY, INC. MNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 1000-141-3-38.1 Proposed site plan to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone. ~ON. -JUNE 14, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. Southold Town~anning Department 530~lain Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Tel #: (631) 765-1938 Fax#: (631) 765-3136 To: Jacalyn Fleming, Munley, Meade, Fax: 631-425-4104 Nielsen, Re From: Bruno Semon Date: 5/7/2004 Re: Omipoint Penny site Pages: 5 CC: Office file [] Urgent [] For Review [] Please Comment [] Please Reply [] Please Recycle you will find a copy the correspondence sent to the :k Fire Department. have any questions please ve us a call. Thank You Bruno Semon PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 May 7, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666, Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Fire Well for Omnipoint Communications at the Penny Lumber site 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-141-3-38.1 Dear Mr. Keogh: / We are in receipt of the letter dated May 5, 2004 from the agent of the abov/described site plan application. The Planning Board requires that you confirm the fire well requested on the letter dated April 15, 2004 from the Fire District is still a requirement for this proposed action. For your information the public hearing will be held on June 14, 2004 for this site plan and it would be advantageous that we get a response before the hearing date. I would like to thank you in advance for the help with this matter. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. · /B f~n6 S~q~on Senior Site Plan Reviewer eno. CC:file, PB, Munley, Meade, Nelson& Re. Richard Connor Riley & Associates RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC Agent ~or T-Mobile 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D123 Great River, New York 11739 Phone 631-224-6600 Facsimile 631-224-6610 www.rcriley.com Via Facsimile - 631- 765-1823 Via Airborne Express - 6039077354 May 5, 2004 Mr. Victor L'Eplattenier, Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold Planning Depas'tment 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Site Plan Review and Recommendation SCTM # 1000-141-03-38.1 12585 Sound.4venue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. L'Eplattenier: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (T-Mobile) hereby presents the exhibits sent to the Mattituck Fire District in response to their recommendation of the fire-well installation on Route 48 (Middle Road) in the area in front of our proposed installation at 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY. The information contained within the enclosed letter from WFC, Architects, LLP will provide information that our proposed cellular telephone communications equipment installation will not increase the risk of explosion or fire at the subject site. We would like the Town of Southold Planning Department to consider this information in their final recommendation to the Town of Southold Planning Board. Thank you for your timely attention to this matter. Very~/~ly yours, Michael K. Korotkow RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. Phone 631-224-6623 Facsimile: 631-224-6610 E-Mail: mkorotkow~rcrile¥.com Enclosure: Letter, WFC, Architects, LLP RCR Cover Letter to Mattituck Fire District RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC Agent for T. Mobile 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D123 Great River, New York 11739 Phone 631-224-6600 Facsimile 631-224-6610 www.rcriley.com Via Facsimile - 631-298-8841 Via Airborne Express - 6182471551 April 29, 2004 Mr. John Harrison Mattituck Fire District 1000 Pike Street Mattituck, New York t 1952 Re: Site Plan Review and Recommendation SCTM # 1000-141-03-38.1 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Harrison: It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday and I am following up on our conversation with the documentation detailing our proposed installation at 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York. The information contained within the enclosed letter from WFC, Architects, LLP will provide information that our proposed cellular telephone communications equipment installation will not increase the risk of explosion or fire at the subject site. We would like the Mattituck Fire District to reconsider their recommendation to the Town of Southold Planning Board specifically that Omnipoint Communications Inc (T-Mobile) install one fire well on Route 48 (Middle Road) in the area in front of the existing frame structure. Thank you for your timely attention to this matter. Very truly yours, Michael K. Korotkow RICHARD CON-NOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. Phone 631-224-6623 Facsimile: 631-224-6610 E-Mail: mkorotkow(arcriley.com Enclosure: Letter, WFC, Architects, LLP April 26, 2004 Mike Korotkow Richard Connor Riley & Associates, LLC 3500 Sunrise Highway Suite D123 Great River, NY 11739 Omnipoint proposed Site No. LI-13-411-A 'Mattituck' (Town of Southold) 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY 11952 WFC Project # 024756 To Whom It May Concern: WILLIAM F. COLLINS, AIA A R C H I T E C T S, L LP William F. Collins, AIA Thomas R. Turkel, AIA Steven R. Saraniero, AIA Nell A. MacDonald, AIA Director of Planning Gary S. Shurnway William F. Collins AIA, Architects, LLP is writing in response to concerns raised by the Board of Fire Commissioners for the Mattituck Fire District concerning the above referenced proposed cellular telephone communications installation, specifically that: "Omnipoint install one (1) firewell on route 48 (Middle Road) in the area in front of the existing frume structure ". The proposed communications equipment cabinets are designed to be connected to an electrical power supply and to telephone service as well as to the proposed antennas mounted within a proposed 100'-0" flagpole. The equipment cabinets are provided with electrically powered air conditioning units. The equipment cabinets are filled with various items of radio equipment and several items of electrical equipment which power the radio equipment including a rack of gel filled batteries which back-up the electrical power source, should it fail. There are no open flames or combustion of any kind within the equipment cabinet or immediately outside of it. The back-up battery system(s) are the 'gel-cell' type, which do not produce out-gassing of combustible gases usually associated with liquid batteries. The equipment cabinets are equipped with an electric panel with circuit breakers, etc. This type of equipment is identical to a typical commercial or residential building. While the subject site does contain combustible materials, the potential incendiary danger from the proposed radio equipment is far less than that posed by cars on site or, the existing on-site building. Absent an inherent source of volatile material, and given that the danger level of the proposed wireless facility is less than that of a private residence, WFC feels that the proposed cellular telephone installation does not increase the risk of explosion or fire at the subject site. Neil MacDonald, AIA Senior Associate cc: Glen DeMarino, WFC; Mary Moran,T-Mobile 10-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 HTTP://WWW. WFCAIA.COM MUNLEYMF-~D ~CONLEY, .MEADE, NIELSEN & R.~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3~ North New York Awenue Huntington, N,w York 11743 (651) 4115-4100 Telecopler WaGE 01 MAY 5 $outhold Town Planning. Boar~ TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NIIMBER: TO: Bruno Semon, Senior Site plan Reviewer FAX NO. (631) 765-3136 Town of Southold RE: Onmipoint Communications Site Plan Apphcation Mattituck FROM: Jacalyn R. Fleming DATE: May 5, 20(M. MESSAGE: Please see the attached correspondence. TOTAL NIIMBER OF PAGES: 4 'Including Cover Page) ~OTE The information contained in this facsimile message i* privileged and confidential end is intended only for the use of ~h¢ i~di*idual named above and others who have bee~a specifically authorized to receive such Information. If the recipient h not the intended recipient, you are hereby uotitied that any ~ieeemin~tion, distribution or copying of thls communication is strktly prohibited, If you have r~eivod this communieatinn In error, or ff any problems occur with traasmiteinn, please noti~ us immediately by :telephone at (631) 41~-4100. Th~k you, MayS, 2004 VIA FACSIMIL..E_E Ms Jeril>m B. Woodhouse, Chair, ~ad Member of the Planning Board Tovm of Southold Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bruno Semo~ Sxe Plan Applica~/or~ Omnipomt Cmnmunications, Iuc. SCTM # 1000; Section: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 38. l Premises: 125855 Soun~Avenue. Matt:tuck. lies. York 11952 Dear ChairWoodbouse: We represent Ommpomt Commurdcat:o:m, Inc. wi~ respect to the above-captioned Site Phn Application. The P~ing Board Office notified us via conespmdenCe dated A~fl 19, 200~, ~t ~e ~im*k N~e ~mct provided a cogent }c~er 5ee~ a fir* well ia ~e projvvt ~a. ~ipomt ~ requested ~t the Bo~d of F~e Commissioners reco~d~ this ~o~enda6~ based ~ ~al ~ proviZ. A ~py of~ ~esp~dence m the Fire ~,~ct is a~ched hereto. We hope m have a resolution oft~$ isle sore. At this tm~e, we respeet~l~y request that the Planning Board schedule the above-¢apt!oned Site Plan Applicatinn for pubi~c heara~g. Should you have any questions with re,peet ~ ~e foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the uadersigr~ed. 04/30'2004 1~:27 FAX ~003/003 April ,26, 2004 Mike Korotk:ow Richard Connror Rile} & .4~sociz~as, LLC 3500 Set, rise ~ighw~) Suite O123 Omnipumt proposed Silo No. kI* l 3~ 11-A 'Matt:tuck' (Town of So'at~.otd) 1258-" Sound Avenue M~tfituok, ~' 11952 W~C Projec: ~ 02-4756 To Whom It Ma_¥ Conemm: ",V d~am 1: Col ms AIA. ^rch~ ects..us..? ~s u.n=mg m response to concerns raised by the Board of Fire Corammsioners for thc M~.tlitttck m.~ D~tnct .:oncoming tlqe above referenc.-d proposed e*llular tel*phone commurticauon$ ;nstallat~on. ~pecifica Iy that ODltltfloitlt llkl'tct! Ora? [~/ /rewell On rout~ 48 6~4~ddle Rocdj l'a tire ~rea in from of tl~e eth'ti.,tg J'e.;tmt~ ~.tr~ct~r¢ '. The proposed communications equipment cai:in*ts are designed to be connected to an electrical power supply and to telel~hcnu s~v:.c* ~s w~li as ~o the proposed anre~a~ mounted ~vithm a proposed 100~-0'' fla~ol¢. ~e equipmunl cabinets ~re provided w~th electrically powcre~ air conditioning anita. The ~u~pment cabinct~ ~ filI~d with item, of r~dio equtpment ~ several itgm~ of elec~ical cqmpment wE/ch power th* ~dio equipmem induing · rack oF ~1 filled ba~erie~ which bacr-u~ the ~lectneal pcb'er scarce, should it There are no open flames or combustion of any kind within the equipment cabioet or immediately outsj~ of it The b~k-up battery syslem(s) are he 'gel-cdP i~e, which do not profuce out-gassing of combustible gases usually associated wltb l~quid b~ttenes The equipment cabinets are equippe~ ~th ar: deetric panel w'th circuit breakers, etc. This ~pe ef*qulpment ~s Jd~:tical to a t~ical :onmerei~'. er residential building. Wile the subject site do~ contain combmtible m~efial,, the potenlml incendiao, d~ngcr f}om ibc pr~osed radSo equtpme~t ~5 far le~s than that posed by ear~ on ~te or, th* exiating on-~ t~ building. Ab~-~nt ~ ii, her*n! ~ource o_% olrttt!e m,t-~nrJ, and g~ven t~.a~ tge danger levd of 2,* proposed wirdess thcili~' ~s less · an iha~ cfa prwat* residenct, WFC f~els that the proposed cellular telephon~ in*tatlation d~e~ not incre~e the hsk of~xploaion oF fire at the sub eot site. Nell MacDonald..\i'x CC: Glen DeMarinc. V..'FC Mary Moron,T-Mob:lo DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECL~nVE Apfill4,2004 Town of Southold Planning Bd. Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Plannin,~ Bead Re: S.C.T.M. No.: S.C.P.C. No.: Omnipoint Communications Inc. 1000-141-3-38.1 1333-LS-G-1877 Dear Sir: Your notification for SEQR Coordination was received by our agency on 3/11/04. Please be advised that our agency, the Suffolk County Planning Commission has no objection to the Town of Southold assuming Lead Agency status for the above referenced. The Suffolk County Planning Commission reserves the fight to comment on this proposed action in the future and wants to be kept informed of all actions taken pursuant to SEQRA and to be provided with copies of all EAF's, DEIS's and FEIS's, etc. Andrew P. Freleng, Principal Planner APF:cc LOCA~ON MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG, - 4th FLOOR · P, O. BOX 6 I O0 · (63 I ) 853-5 RICHARD J. LAVALL£~ P.E. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. COMMISSIONER April27,2004 Town of Southold Planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. at Penny Lumber 50' w/o Westphalia Ave., on the s/s of CR 48 in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Gentlemen: This Departmcm has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. Very truly yours, William S. Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer M. Paul Campagnola~ Director of Highway Planning & Permits WSS/MPC/hi 335 YAPHANK AVENUE SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFiRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER · YAPHANK, N.Y. 1 1980 · (631) 852-4010 FAX (631 ) 852 - 4150 PLANNING BOARD MEMB~S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Aprill9,2004 Mr. Lawrence C. R~ Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Htmtington, NY 11740 Re.' Fire District Response Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Dear Mr. R~: / Enclosed you wil?find a copy of the letter dated April 15, 2004 from the Mattituck Fire District. Please review the enclosed letter and respond in writing if in agreement with the request. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Fire District. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 x229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file eric. April 16, 2004 Mr. Bruno Simon Building Inspector - Town of Southold Town Hall - Building Department 53095 Main Road, Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Omnipoint Communication Inc. Equipment on Grade and New Antennas on existing Monopole 21855 County Road 48, Cutchouge, NY Omnipoint Site No. LI-13-544-A Building Permit No. 29392 Z WFC Project No. 02-4900 WILLIAM F. COLLINS~ AIA A R C H I T E C T S, L LP William F. Collins, AIA Thomas R. Turkel, AIA Steven R. Saraniero, AIA Nell A. MacDonald, AIA Director of Planning Gary S. Shumway Dear Mr. Simon, Our office has visited the above referenced site to visually review the completed equipment installation and it is our opinion that all visually verifiable materials, equipment, and routings are in compliance with the drawings and specifications. We trust the foregoing provides the information you require. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Regards, Nell A. MacDonald, AIA~'~-~--'~ Senior Associate cc: M. Moran, T-Mobile 10-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE SETAUKET, NY 11733 VOICE: 631-689-8450 FAX: 631-689-8459 HTTP://WWW. WFCAIA.COM II TTITUCK FIRE DISTR T PO BOX 666, PIKE STREET MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11952-0666 Commissioners MARTIN L.GRIFFIN, SR. Chairman Norman A. Rellly, Jr., Vice Chairman James D. Roache Grog N. Tyler Jerome Zuhoski April 15, 2004 John A, Keogh, Secretary Barbara Dickerson, Treasurer Mr. Victor Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town P O Box 1179 Southo d, NY 1~971 Dear Mr. At the site plan ~ That 1 on Route, reserves the 3unications, Inc. ~Fire District Thank you S ncere y, //John A. Keogh VSecretary Encl. JAK/jch Office (631) 298-8837 Facsimile (631) 298-8841 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR ' P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 13, 2004 Mr. Lawrence C. R6 Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11740 Re: Proposed Site ~'lan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Located appr?,~imately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Dear Mr. R6: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 12, 2004: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1; and WHEREAS, on January 29, 2004, a formal site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 2004, the New York State Department of Transportation responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status; and WHEREAS, on March 31,2004, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status; and Omnipoint Communications, Inc. - Page Two- 4/13/04 WHEREAS, on April 12, 2004, the Planning Board has not received any comments or objections to the proposed action; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on April 12, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, performed a coordinated review of this Unlisted Action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairperson encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chslr RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR ' P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant April 11, 2004 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. at Penny Lumber SCTM#: 1000-141-3-38.1 Location: Approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for the applicant to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zoning District. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Ne.qative Declaration - Pa.qe Two There has not been any correspondence received from the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals, Southold Town Building Department, Southold Town Board, Southold Town Board of Trustees, NYSDEC - Stony Brook, and the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from these agencies. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Department of Planning in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. There has not been any correspondence received from the Suffolk County Water Authority Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. On March 15, 2004, the New York State Department of Transportation responded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agenc,~/status. / On March 31, 2004, the Suffolk County Department of Public Works re.~p'onded with no objection to the Town of Southold Planning Board assuming lead agency status. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 (x 229) CC: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works 04/8~Z2084 Mt.~LE'~ MEAD NIUNLEY, MEADE,NIELSEN & RE ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 North New York Avenue Huntl~gton~ Ne,~ York 11743 (631) 425-~100 ~eleeopJcr (631) 425-4104 TELECOPY TO THE FOLLOWING NUMBER: To: RE: FROM: DATE: PA~ 01 APR 7 2904 So,¢,hold Town Plamqng Board, Town of Scm::hold FAX NO. (631) 765-3136 Ommpok~t Communications Site Plan .Application Jacalyn R. Fleming Alxil 6, 200,* MESSAGE: Pleaee s~e the attached letter; TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 (Including Cover Page) The/nformat/on conta~ed in this facsimile me~sage is privllesed and confidential end/s Intended only ~r the use the individual named above anti ot~eri who have been sp~fi~fly au~or~ed to recent su~ informa~on, If ~e recipient is not the in~ded recipient, you are hereby notified that any dt~flo~ di*~bu~on or coping t~s eo~t~on Is st~efly pro~b~ted, ffyou have re,dyed ~h eo~mlelfion in error, or if any problm otter with ~nns~/on, please notify ~ l~edlately by telephone at (631) 42~100. T~a~ you. April 6, 2004 Ms. Jenlyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, and Membe~ of the P;anning Board Tot~ of Sou~hold Box 1179 f309~ M~m Read Sou~hold, Ne~ York ~ 197~ At+.ent~on; M~. Bmuo Semen Site Plan Application On!mpomt Communications, Inc. SCTM# 10()0: Secficrn: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 3il Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue. Matiituck. lqew York 11952 Dear Chair Woof. house: We represer, r Omnipo/nt Co~:munications, Lc. 'a,i~ res]peet to the above-captioned Site Plan Application. The Plarming Board Office notified us ~:a correspondence dated March 9, 2004, that ~e Planning Board had initiated SEQRA lead age'aW coordination at their March 8~ 2004, meeting. Subsequently, we received notificariorj that the bm:hitect Review Comm/ttee reviewed our Si~ Plan Application and aelmowledged ~ there are no architectural ch~ractmstics that bear conmaent. No conditions were recommended. At this time, we respectfully request that the piing Board ~ehedule the above-oapfiot:ed $1~e Plan Application £or public hearm8. Should you have a~y questions with tesl:ect to ibc foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the unders~,gned. ve~trUlyyo~s, MLrN'I~Y, MEADE, NIELSEN & ~ // / ' -/ ~ lacab~R. Fleming / RICHARD J. LAVALLE, P,E. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WOI; CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. COMMISSIONER March 31, 2004 Town of Southold planning Board Office P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N. Y. 11971-0957 Attn: Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: CR 48, Middle Rd.; 50' w/o Westphalia Ave. Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 50' w/o Westphalia Ave SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. WSS/MPC/ln Very truly yours, William S. Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer Director of Highway Planning & Permits 335 YAPHANK AVENUE SUFFOLK COUNTY IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER · YAPHANK, N.Y. 11980 · (631)852-4010 FAX (631 ) 852- 4 ! 50 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER'S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: To: From: Re: March 19, 2004 James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer Bruno Semen, Semor S~.., Plan Reviewer New revised site plan for Omnipoint Communications (George Penny) Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-141-3-38.1 Zoned: LI Status: Active site plan set with SEQRA review in process. Return Date: ASAP / In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please use this site plan for your review. This site plan is erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-141.-3-38.1 The Site Plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: I Site plan prepared by Williams MacDonald last dated 03/03/04. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 19, 2004 Ms. Jacalyn R. Fleming Munley, Meade, Nielson & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, N.Y. 11743 Re~ Omnipoint Communications-George Penny. 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-141-03-38.1 Zone: LI Dear Mrs. Fleming, / This letter is to inform you that the above listed site plan application was reviewed at the '. Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on March 4, 2004. Attached you will find a copy of the minutes from the meeting. Please review the minutes and notify us in writing if you are in agreement with the condition. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. R,e,s fully s, Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc. ARC minutes SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MARCH 4, 2004 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30p.m., Members present were: Garrett A. Stra~g, Co-Chairman Robert I Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr., Landmarks Preservation Committee Herbert Ernst, Southold Also present were Councilman Thomas .Wickham, Bruno Semen of the Planning Board Staff, Michael and Joy Domino for Greenport Heights Development Corporation, John Rose and Diane Herald, R.A, for First Baptist Church of Cutchogue, Jim DeLuca, R.A. for RMB Realty LLC. and Pat Moore, Esq. for Mattituck Fire Department. Greenport Heights Development Corp. (74365 Main Road, Greenport) The applicants resubmitted their previous=~lrawings with no changes but only described material and,~ finish choices. A discussion ensued with regard to the applicant's reason for not considering the design alternates suggested by the committee at the December 2nd meeting. The applicant indicated he liked the design of the building as it was and would not be willing to entertain any design alternates. The Committee indicated that although we would have preferred the building's from facade to face South, (NYS Rt. 25) we could understand his reason for having it face West. The committee reiterated it's concerns that both the South and East facing facades were not sympathetic to their Main Road exposure, especially given the fact the building site is located on the primary corridor to and from Greenport Village. We once again suggested that some creative architectural modifications to the South and East elevations could be accomplished with little or no additional construction cost and much aesthetic benefit to not only the Town and Village but also the project site. '~0 the committee's disappointment, the applicant refused to give these suggestions any consideratior,,/. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED t6 deny the application and stand by the committee's original re~olution of December 2, 2003, copy attached. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. First Baptist Church of Cutchogue (C.R. 48, Cutchogue) Due to budget reasons, the Applicant's architect described a design change from that which ~vas previously approved, of an all masonry building to a steel flamed building with a simulated brick veneer ("Genstone") and a bronze colored standing seam metal roof. It was noted the building design and footprint stayed essentially the same however Robert Brown voiced a reservation to the ridge intersections not aligning. All other architectural elements, materials and finishes are to remain as previously approved.. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to accept the modification to the original approval. Vote oftha Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will~ cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. SOLrI~OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTE MARCH 4, 2O04 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30p.m., Members present were: Garrett A. Stradg, Co,Chairman Robert I Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr., Landmarks Preservation Committee Herbert Ernst, Southold Also present were Councilman Thomas .Wickham, Bruno Semen of the Planning Board Staff, Michael and Joy Domino for Greanport Heights Development Corporation, John Rose and Diane Herald, R.A. for First Baptist Church of Cutchogue, Jim DeLuca, R.A. for RMB Realty LLC. and Pat Moore, Esq. for Mattituck Fire Department. Greenport Heights Development Corp. (74365 Main Road, Greenport) The applicants resubmitted their previous~tra~vings with no changes but only deacribed material and. finish choices. A discussion ensued with regard to the applicant's reason for not considering the design alternates suggested by the committee at the December 2"'~ meeting. The applicant indicated he liked the design of the building as it was and would not be willing to entertain any design alternates. The Committee indicated that although we would have preferred the building's front facade to face South, (NYS Rt. 25) we could understand his reason for having it face West. The committee reiterated it's concerns that both the3outh and East facing facades were not sympathetic to their Main Road exposure, especially give~:i the fact the building site is located on the primary corridor to and from Greenport Village. Wg6nce again suggdsted that some creative architectural modifications to the South and East elevations could be accomplished with little or no additional construction cost and much aesthetic benefit to not only the Town and Village but also the project site. To the committee's disappointment, the applicant refused to give these suggestions any consideration. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to deny the application and stand by the committee's original re~olution of December 2, 2003, copy attached. Voteofthe Committee: Ayes All. Applicants a, e reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission &the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. First Baptist Church of Cutchogue (C.R. 48, Cutchogue) Due to budget reasons, the Applicant's architect described a design change from that which ~vas previously approved, of an all masonry building to a steel framed building with a simulated brick veneer ("Genstone") and a bronze colored standing seam metal roof. It was noted the building design and footprint stayed essentially the same however Robert Brown voiced a reservation to the ridge intersections not aligning. All other architectural elements, materials and finishes are to remain as previously approved. Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Garrett Strang, it was RESOLVED to accept the modification to the original approval. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. RMB Realty, LLC (C.R. 48, Southold) "The Applicant's firchitect described a new medical complex comprised of two one story brick venoer I~uildings of traditional styl~ with a central courtyard and surrounded by parking. The roofing will be architectural shingles 'in a x*eathered wood color, windows to be Andersen white vinyl clad and entry doors to'be white aluminuTM commercial storefront. The applicant offered to have all roof penetrations on the courtyard side of the buildings, install "Period Style" low, pole mounted, 360 degree lighting fixtures in the courtyard only with higher pole mounted parking lot lighting, shielded to totally contain light on the site. The applicant agrees to delete the vinyl siding at the gable ends and install a "Hardie Plank" type siding product in its place. The committee recommends that the Planning Board "Land Bank" the northerly most row of parking along CI~ 48 to increase the planting area transition between the road and the parking area. The applicant agreed with this recommendation. Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to approve the application as submitted with the CONDITIONS that all roof penetrations match the color of the roof, all ground mounted mechanical equipment be screened with landscaping, and final lighting fixture choices as well as site/building signage I~e submitted for review by the ARC. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively ~mpact securing the Cert~fica,e of Occupancy:- / Mattituck Fire Department (Pike Street, JClattituck) The Applicant's attorney described a small addition to the pike street side of the headquarters building to house a radio room/dispatch area with all materials matching the existing building. In addition an existing accessory building in the southwest corner of the site will be reconstructed for use as a command center. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to approve the application as submitted with the CONDITION that the material choices and colors for the reconstructed accessory building be submitted for review by the ARC. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. lk ..... ~ L_...'.._. ~'" - · ~ _- - (Sound Avenue, Mattituck) Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to thank the Planning Board for the referral but to acknowledge that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Meeting Adjourned at 6:00 P.M. The next meeting has yet to be scheduled. Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 2, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m.. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chair~an. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr.,Landmarks Preservation Committee Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Aisc present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Michael aRd Joy Domino for Greenport Heights Development Corporation, Darin Skrezek for Natural Landscape Accents, and Thomas Wickham, Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Strar)g, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of November 6, 2003. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. BREWER YACHT YARD (Manhasset Avenue - Greenport) Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED that the prior CONDITIONS were SATISFIED SAVE for the color of the roof. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. GREENPORT HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (74365 Main Road - Greenport) The applicants described a 2400 square foot building to be shared by restaurant and retail spaces and faced to the west. The Committee recommended that the design professional suggest changes to acknowledge that the South elevation faces the street and to mitigate the appearance of the East elevation which is now designed as the rear of the structure.'~' ~ Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting design possibilities and the completed checklist pertaining to roof penetrations, exterior lighting etc. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NATURAL LANDSCAPE ACCENTS (North Road - Peconic) The applicant described a 50,000 square metal, heated, storage building to include an office and toilet facilities. The Committee suggested that the roof pitch be increased to as much as 6 in 12 and that the porch roof be changed from a hip to a straight shed design. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application pending rev!..sed drawings and the information on the Committee's checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. RMB Realty, ~ (CIR. 48, Southold) ~Fhe Applieant'~ 3xehite~t deScribed a new.medical complex comprised of two one story brick veneer buildings of~traditiona~l styl~ with a central courtyard and surrounded by parking. The roofing will be architectural ~h~gi~'s 'in a geeathered wood color, windows to be Andersen white vinyl clad and entry dbbrs to'he white alunvinun~ commercial storefront. The applicant offered to have all roof penetrations on the courtyard side of the buildings, install "Period Style" low, pole mounted, 360 degree lighting fixtures in the courtyard only with higher pole mounted parking lot lighting, shielded to totally contain light on the site. The applicant agrees to delete the vinyl siding at the gable ends and install a "Hardie Plank" type siding product in its place. The committee recommends that the Planning Board "Land Bank" the northerly most row of parking along C1~ 48 to increase the planting area transition between the road and the parMng aret~ The applicant agreed with this recommendatiot~ Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to approve the application as submitted with the CONDITIONS that all roof penetrations match the color of the roof, all ground mounted mechanical equipment be screened with landscaping, and final lighting fixture choices as well as site/building signage be submitted for review by the ARC. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approv6d drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Mattituck Fire Department (Pike Street, Mattituck) The Applicam's attorney described a small addition to the pike street side of the headquarters building to house a radio ro,ojr.ddispateh area with all materials matching the existing building. In addition an existing accessory~building in the southwest corner of the site will be reconstructed for use as a command center. !' Moved by GarrettStrang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to approve the application as submitted with the CONDITION that the material choices and colors for the reconstructed accessory building be submitted for review by the ARC. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause rescission ofihe original approval and may negatively impact securing the Certificate of Occupancy. Penney Lumber Cellular Phone Tower (Sound Avenue, Mattituck) Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Herbert Adler, it was RESOLVED to thank the Planning Board for the referral but to acknowledge that there are no architectural characteristics that bear comment. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. Meeting Adjourned at 6:00 P.M. The next meeting has yet to be scheduled. Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 2, 2003 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p.m,. Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman. Robert I. Brown, Co-Chairman Herbert Adler, Jr.,Landmarks Preservation Committee Howard Meinke, Cutchogue Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also present were Bruno Semon of the Planning Board staff, Michael aRd Joy Domino for Greenport Heights Development Corporation, Darin Skrezek for Natural Landscape Accents, and Thomas Wickham, Moved by Robert Brown and seconded by Garrett Stra ~ng, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meebng of November 6, 2003. Vote of the Committee: Ayes BREWER YACHT YARD (Manhasset Avenue - Greenport) Moved by Herbert Adler and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED that the prior CONDITIONS were SATISFIED SAVE for the color of the roof. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. GREENPORT HEIGHTS ~'~EvELOPMENT CORPQRATION (74365 Main Road Greenport) The applicants described a 2400 square foot building to be shared by restaurant and retail spaces and faced to the west. The Committee recommended that the design professional suggest changes to acknowledge that the South elevation faces the street and to mitigate the appearance of the East elevation which is now designed as the rear of the structure. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it v~as RESOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting design possibilities and the completed checklist pertaining to roof penetrations, exterior lighting etc. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. NATURAL LANDSCAPE ACCENTS (North Road - Peconic) The applicant des~;ribed a 50,000 square metal, heated, storage building to include an office and toilet facilities. The Committee suggested that the roof pitch be increased to as much as 6 in 12 and that the porch roof be changed from a hip to a straight shed design. Moved by Garrett Strang and seconded by Robert Brown, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the application pending revised drawings and the information on the Committee's checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. March 15, 2004 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y 11788-5518 Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Dear Mr. Semon: Re: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. S/S CR48, W/O Westphahia Ave. SCTM #1000-141-3-38.1 Mattituck We reviewed the Full Environmental Assessment Form for the proposed flagpole/antenna as proposed by Omnipoint Communications, Inc. in a Light Industrial District (Zone LI). We concur with the Southold Planning Board wishes to assume SEQR lead agency status. We have no other comments in relation to this proposal. Very truly yours, Planning & Program Management PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. I~DWARDS MARTIN H~ SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 119 71-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: To: From: Re: March 11, 2004 Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector -.~ Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~ Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications (George Penny) Mattituck, NY SCTM# 1000-141-3-38.1 Zoned: LI Status: Active site plan set with SEQRA review in process. Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please use this site plan for your certification review. This site plan is erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-141 .-3-38.1 The Site Plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. Cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Williams MacDonald last dated 03/03/04. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 119 71-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 9, 2004 Mr. Lawrence C. R~ Munley, Meade, Nielsen 8, R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11740 Re: Dear Mr. R~: Proposed Site Plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) ,~/ The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 8, 2004: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to erect a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas on a 3.82 acre parcel in the LI Zone located approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck, SCTM#1000-141-3~38.1; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Part 617, Article 6 of the Environmental Conservation Law acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, initiates the SEQR lead agency coordination process for this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, house Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 March 9, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the re:~ponsibilities of lead agency; and / 3. Issues of concern which you~b~lieve should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. 50' west of Westphalia Avenue, on the south side of County Road 48, in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) Requested Action: The proposed action involves a site plan for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. to erect.a 100' flagpole and affix public utility wireless telecommunication panel antennas at approximately 50' west of Westphalia Avenue on the south side of County Road 48 in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-141-3-38.1 Zone: LI (Light Industrial District) SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( x ) Unlisted Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer (631) 765-1938, X 229 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (X This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. Other (see comments below) Comments: The site is currently in use as Light Industrial with an operational lumber supply company. ~lease feel free to contact this office for further information. i/Very truly yours, /5~J'erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson cc: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority *Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works *Maps are enclosed for your review 617.20 Appendix A State Environment Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of wbether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potantially-larga impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - Type 1 and Unlisted Actions P0rt~ons:i-- of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 [] Part3 Identify the Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts land 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. * [] C. The project may result in one more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Omnipoint Communications, Inc. wireless communications facility Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date l~evis~l from original dated 9/23/03 I LI-13-411 ~RT1 - PROJECT INFORMATIO~ Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public reviow. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. ~AM~ OF ACTION Omnipoint Comm~mies*ions, Inc. wireless communications facility LOCATION OF ACTION (include Sla'eet Address, Municipality and County) 12~55 Sound Avenue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSER BUSINESS TELEPHONE Omnipoint Communications, ln~. 631-218-$000 ADDRESS 21 Keyhnd Court I STATE ZIP CODE NY 11716 BUSINESS TELEPHONE CITY/PO Bohemia NAME OF OWNER (if different) George L. Penny, Inc. ADDRESS 12855 Sound Avenue CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Mattitack NY 119~2 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: The installation of a wireless communications facility consisting of a 100'-0' foot free-standing stealth monopole structure (flagpole design) to be located within a leased 4-1400 square foot compound that will be enclosed by a 6-feot chain link fence. The antenna facility would be located within the interior of the flagpole structure. The facility will be supported by three (3) outdoor equipment cabinets located south of the monopole structure within the fenced compound. Tbe facility will require power and telephone to be supplied by local providers. Please complete Each Question - Indicate N.A if not applicable. A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial [] Residential (suburban) [] Forest [] Agriculture [] Other 2. Total acreage of project area: N/A acresx Approximate Acreage Presently Meadow or Bmshland (Non-agriculture) ~ acres Forested ~ acres Agriculture (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type) 3. acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? CuB -cut and fill land. t_,entlv sioninff2 a. Soil drainage: [] Well drained 100% of site [] Moderately well drained [] Rural (non-farm) After Completion % of site [] Poorly drained % of site b. If any agriculture land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? _0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370) Are there bedrock outcropping on project site? [] yes [] no a. What is the depth to bedrock? ~ (In feet) Revised from original dated 9/23/03 2 LI-13-411 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [] 0-10% 100% [] 15% or greater [] 10-15% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places: [] Yes [] No3 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table? >4 (in feet)n 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?. [] Yes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes [] No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? [] Yes [] No According to Site visit- property is fully developed. [] No Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [] Yes [] No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [] Yes [] No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: noue a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name: nones // 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No / a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [] Yes [] No ~' b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [] Yes [] No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [] Yes [] No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes []No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [] Yes [] No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor :t:1400 sq.feet. (leased compound space.) b. Project acreage to be developed. 4-1400 sq.ft initially; -1400 sq.ft ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped N/A acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing N/A; proposed 0~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour _1 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 100'-0' height; width, j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? _0 ft. length. (height of monopole) Revised from original dated 9/23/03 3 LI-13-411 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0.0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [] Yes [] No [] N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? -0 acres' 5. Will any nature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed bY this pr°ject? [] Yes [] No 6. if single phase project: Anticipated period o~ constr~etion 1_ months, (including demoliti°n)- 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No 9. Number ofjobs generated: during construction _5; after project is complete -0. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0. 11. Willprojectrequirereloeationofanyprojectsorfacilifies? [-]Yes []No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount ~ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be disc,~iarged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Y~e( [] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? [] Yes [] No Explain 15. Is project or any portion ofproject located in a 100 year flood plain? []Yes []No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location _ __ d. Will any waste not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes [] No e. If yes, explain ~ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ~ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? .years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [] Yes [] No 19. Will project routinely produce orders (more than one hour per day)? [] Yes [] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes [] No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) Electrical 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 0 gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 0 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain ~ Revised from original dated 9/23/03 4 LI-13-411 25. Approvnls Required: City, Town, Village Board [] Yes [] No City, Town, Village Planning Board [] Yes [] No City, Town Zoning Board [] Yes [] No City, County Health Department [] Yes [] No Other Local Agencies [] Yes [] No Other Regional Agencies [] Yes [] No State Agencies [] Yes [] No Federal Agencies [] Yes [] No Type Submittal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate decision required: [] zoning amendment [] zoning variance I--[speeial use permit [] subdivision [] site plan [] new/revision of master plan [] resource management plan [] other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? LI - Li hg.h_t_.indastrial 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted bY the present z°ning? Parcel ia currently developed as a lumber yard 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? None proposed 5. What is the ~iaximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? None propfised 6. Is the proPOsed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes [] No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius °f pr°p°sed actiun? LI, R-40, llBvRO - retail shopping, marina~ eateries, one-family residential, a~riculturai 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within ¼ mile? [] Yes [] No 9. if the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~ 10. Will proposed action require any anthorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes [] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is existing capacity suffieiant to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation oftraftic significantly above present levels? [] Yes [] No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [] Yes [] No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certifyfll~a~ the0hformati~n provided above is tie to the best of my knowledge. Applicant~ons~r .N,~r~.O/ma~ooillt ~tions, Inc. Date 12/30/2003 Signature ~( ~/c}~A. ~t~//./ ~..~/~LJDMS Consultin~ Services, Inc. Title planner . . If the action is i~'~the Coastal area, and y~u ar~a state agency, complete the Coastal assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Revised fxom original dated 9/23/03 5 LI-13-411 t The subject parcel lies within an industrial zoning district. The current use of the property is that of an active lumbeuard containing an office building, storage buildings, heavy-duty equipment and related supplies. Surface materials within the developed parcel consist of both gravel and impervious surfaces. The addition of the proposed action would not alter the existing conditions of the prirn~y use. The proposed fenced compound area would be placed within the developed portion of the property not causing any new soil disturbance or removal of vegetation. 2 Reference: United States DeparUnent of Agriculture Soil Conservation Survey, Suffolk County. This unit is made up of level to gently sloping area that have been cut and filled for nonfarm uses. Slopes Range from 1 to 8 percent...(page 68) 3 Reference: National Register Listings in Suffolk County inclusive of State Listings. Two (2) properties are noted within Mattituck: 1. Richard Cox House - Mill Road 2. Andrew Gildersleeve octagonal Building - Main Road and Love Lane Given the nature of the proposed action, an review from the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation was initiated in January 2003. A response of No Effect was received dated October, 16, 2003. 4 Reference: United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Survey, Suffolk County. Cut and Fill land is generally associated with Carver and Plymouth soils. (page 68). Depth to seasonal high water table - Table 5, page 34. Both Carver and Plymouth soils list the water table as greater than 4 feet. Noted for the CuB Series, it is not included within Table 5, because the characteristics are too variable to estimate. 5 The nearest body of water is the Mattimck Creek located north-northeast of the subject parcel. The activity currently existing within the subject parcel nor the action proposed would have an effect on this body of water. 6 The proposed communication facility is unmanned and would not require parking or disturb the current off- street parking available for the patrons, employees and on-site equipment. Revised from original dated 9/23/03 6 LI-13411 ~UNLEY~ I~EADE~ NIELSEN & 1~ March 5, 2004 (631) 425-4100 (631) 425-4104 VIA UPS NEXT DAY AIR Ms. Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bruno Semon Site Plan Application Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM # 1000: Section: 14l, Block: 03, Lot: 38.1 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Chair Woodhouse: We represent Omnipoint Communications, Inc. in the above-captioned Site Plan Application. In response to your comment letter dated February 11, 2004, enclosed please find ten (10) signed and sealed copies of the revised Site Plan with Elevations. Please discard the copies of the plans previously submitted. In addition, the attached letter from William Parker and copy of the lease between the landowner and Omnipoint Communications, Inc. is submitted in response to your request for clarification on access to the proposed facility. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, ~JJacalyn R. Fleming Enclosures RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, LLC 3500 Sunrise Highway, Suite D123 Great River, NY 11739 Phone: (631) 224-6600 Fax: (631) 224-6610 www.rcrile¥.com March 3, 2004 Planning Board Members Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971-0959 OmniPoint Communications, Inc. Proposed Telecommunications Tower Site Address: 12855 Sound Ave., Mattituck Site File No.: LI-13-411 SCTM: 1000-141-03-38.1 Zone: LI Dear Board Members: Our firm represents OmniPoint Communications, Inc. regarding the leasing and zoning issues regarding the above referenced application with the Town of Southold. Please accept this correspondence as reference to the access clarification request on your correspondence dated February 11, 2004. The owner of the above referenced property, Mr. George L. Penny, has granted OmniPoint Communications full twenty-four hour/seven days a week access to the site. OmniPoint will have possession of any and all keys and combinations to any locks that are required for this site located on Mr. Penny's property. Please refer to Paragraph 3 on the attached Addendum to the Site Lease regarding further information on access to the site. In case of emergency access, Mr. Penny has been informed to contact OmniPoint's Long Island switch facility at 631-218-9500. In case of a fire or other potential hazard, police or fire personnel can use a chain cutter to gain access to the site. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. on behalf of O ' oint Communications William Parker Enclosures- Lease 03/03/2004 11:45 FAX 9732926893 T-MOBZLE ENGINEERING ~002/017 SITE LEASE WITH OPTION THI$SIFEI..F. ASE I'lH¢)lrrlON(l~s L,e.'~.,~)~;bya~tlbclv,.¢cnGeurgcLPcrmy lac. CLa~dlard"lmd Omnil~iltt FacililiL%,. Network 3, LL.C. :, l~ela v,'m't.. Lin~itcd. Lia[~i[ity CompaA~y("Tcmm~"). (:b5 In consideration of th~ paym.~nl of five hundred and re'cliO0 dollars (S5~.~) (tl~e "~ion Fcc') by T~z~wt lo lwclve (12) months. ~m~l~cing on II~e EIl~clive Dale (;u: {~fin~ below) (~c "O~ion Pcnod"). Thc Option Pcri~ may bc hundred ;md n~100 dollars ($~) ("Add~uon~ O~on Fct") al any Omc prim to thc ~d ~d'thc ~ion Pefi~, 4..1'[em,. Tc. nam shall p,qy L,a~dlord, aK re.lit, II J . hundFcd and noll00 dolI~ ~ ~r ~nth ("l~cnl'). ~ payable. ~fl~in Iwemy (20) dnys foUowing ,~w ~ncc~nt Da~ peor~ for ~e re,n~ndgr o[ g~e n~n~ t0 Ge~Y. 1,q~rd? ad~css s~cific~ in Sccdon 12 ~](~w. If this I~ i~. t~inafcd at a [imc o1~ 5. ~h(~ ~:[~) a~ition~, nyc. year terms (~ach a 'Rmewal Tcrm"). Each~~ f~xce~ ~hal Ren~ shall ~ increased by row' ~cent ~~dc;d~or c~ su~siv~ Rcnewal Term unleS~~, at~ (~) days prior 03/03/2004 11:45 FAX 9732928893 T-NOBZLE ENGINEERING ~003/017 dcfim'g below) ("Constmctimt Interference"). L~mdlurd furlbcr ach~owlcdgc~ U~;,[ h ~','ill bc rcspoa:;lblc for any costs and (¢) As p;~rtial con=idcrullon [o~ Rcnt paid under Ibis l.case. I.~ndlotd hcrc~), grants T~anl an ca~cmcn~ th, undcr ~nd R~cwn] 'rc~ ~coll~liv~ly, the "Eas~m~tS'). ~ Ea~cmcnt~ pwv~dcd ~rcundcr ~halJ havc thc sa~ tci'm ~ this ~. (.Ct '~have 24-huur~-a-day. 7.days-a.~.,eek ~ce~x m ~he Pre~mse~ ("Access") .qi ;~)1 times dunng the Initial Tcrm of Ibis Lc~c and ~m~-:Fe~n.~.-la. lb~_e~!ord, its cmploycc~ o~' a$cnls impcdc or d~y Access to Tcnmlt. its emplnye~s or .~gea~t~. Tenan~ ~hall, wilhoul waivin~ ;my ofl~¢r n'-~l~G-~trat-e~my-~v.~.~ui~y, dedu~l (~m Rent amtount,~ thee m~der IhJs Le~e nn amount cqufl to fix ¢ hundred and nO/100 thdlars (~all~lllll~m' (ta~~r~ is impeded or dcnicd, thi~ Le~¢ within that thirty (30) day pcriud; ('~.. uL~ ' ff~) 'lay~' wriucn noUce hy Tenanl if {hc Property or the Amenna Facilities ~e, or I)ecome 03/03/2004 11:45 FAX 9732928893 T-#OBILE ENGINEERING ~004/017 d l ri~,h~.~ a~ oi Gle da, maFc or deslruction, and 'l'cn:ml ~1 bc colJi]~d [o Linc otbcr ri~htx gr:~n~c~ h--~ il a~ law or ~n cq~d~y, cac~ part), s~)l Mayo thc ri~L b,m ~t thc obligations, to ~c:mina~c t~i~ Lca~c on .Lq. ~. ~dlo~d ~halt p=y wh~ duc ~1 roi pricey ~xcs ~r thc Pro~y. including ~ Prc~. [n ~ c~n[ Tc~ ~n ~ ~y ~y ~l pzo~~y ~x ~r any other t~x or' fcc which ~c d~mc[iy altdbutablc to thc ~tse~e (a) Temm[ :dr,Il provide ¢o~n~ci',d Gc~cr'al LJabili~ Insurance in .z~ =t:[:Tc~::~e ;amr. un[ o1' Onc Mill~on and 03/03/2004 11:4G FAX 973292BB93 T-NDBILE ENGIHEER[NG ~005/017 12.~0 .'i E 31t~' Uclle. vue. WA 9~006 George L P',mny, Inc. PO Box 2067, Grecnport. NY I lg-~t 1:4. Ouit~t ]F, nioyracm. Tiflc m~d Aufl~oril¥. I;mdlord coven~ts and wa~:mls I0 Ten:mi that (i) ~dlord h~ full nghL ~w~ ~d ~omy to cxccom ~is tz~; (ii) it has g~d and une~tmbcr~ title to ~ Pfo~rty fz'e~ ~td cl~ Of any licns or montages, cacc~ IhO~c disclos~ lo T~nnt and which will not interfere wt~ T~t*s ~ghts ~ nr usc of thc ~; ~d (iii) upon wriR~x~to LandlOrd. Uptm such a_~sJgnment, Tcna)~l sb;tll ~ rchcv~ of ~1 habili6~ ~ obligations Promises. ex~ lbo{ Ibc ol~ ~i~ fOg an~' Mogg~s ~1 not ~ Ics~ than ~iny (30} days afl~ of ~ dcf~h fl~icc. ~ovi&d in Secdon 9 offl~ ~. All s~h noticcs ~o Mnnga~< ~1 ~ s~ to ~tort~ces ~ ~s ~fi~ by T~. F~c by ~ tO give Mt~3~ ~ ~ficc ~l ~ d~ ~'~ aB~ 'r~ shall 16..~.Jl~e.'P~o¢~ ~ A~;~icm;. Thi.~ ~ and the .l?.&~e~ms ip'a~rzl he4,cin ah.~l run with tim l~od. ~ sh;Ol b¢ binding 17. W- iv - · i , t-~,dlord h~tchy w~ives any ant] ~1 lien m ~ 311 ~ 03/03/2004 11:4B FAX $732928833 T-#OBZLE ENGZNEER[NG 15. MiscclL~u~nu~. ~ ~y bc ~ in p]~ or tl~i~ ~T~~ cv~ Li~e Pm~ty ~s cnc~m~ by a ~n~ ~ ~/ c~h s~h ~ga~ ~ ~ of ~a. in a ferm ~a<,ata~y ~*~le m Tc~~~ mlefest ~. ~i~ shall ~ti~ m full fo~ ~ rff~. ~se ~i~ aS~ fl~ if ~y ~4sitms ~e ~ ~ c~abk. ~y ~ ~w~c fl~ ~ ~ ' of L~ P~y) ~ ~hi~t B (t~ P~s l(~n within :~ ~o~v). may ~ atl~ t~ ~d die Me~l~dum or~~[qi~gly, thc p;~lc; ague ~al u~n t~c ~tc~i~n~ fO~, may ~ replaced ~y Tenant ~th su~ ~al, ~rc co.leto cx~btt(~). ~c t~s O~c 03/03/2004 11:4G FAX 9732928893 T-#OBILE ENGI#EER~HG ~007/017 L~NDLOKD: By: PfinlC41 Name: D~: T£NANq': By: Approvc~ as to form 03/03/2004 11:49 FAX 9732828899 T-NOBILE ENGINEERING ~008/017 ADDENDUM TO SITE },.EASE WITit OPTION [Additional Terms] del'nub by 'J'cn;mt. and all DrcpaM Rem ~hall bc immediately refunded lo Tcnant. 5, _R~e.~. Tcmmt shall have O~c right to Cxlcnd this l.eay, c for fly(: (_~) '.alditional. live-year tcrtns ("Renewal Term"). Each 3. Pat'agraph 7(I) is hereby tlelctcd ia its entirety and rcplaced :t~ follow::: '/if) Tot. ant shall have 24*hoq.~-a--day. 7-day,a-wet& access to dm Pnmfi..:es al a/Il limes during fl~ Imtial Term of this L~asc and any Rcm:wal Term 3. Pm'al,"raph ?(g) is bcxcby ~ ~s follows: thc sixty (~0) da)* I~t'M. tl~ Landlord ,,s-ill t~ (:nlidt*d. tyuz ma s~l~ac~l m. di~cb.~gc O~ b~md thc san'¢. Tm:mt viii a.. P;~ata'ap~ 8(c) is hereby d~le.~e~ in it'; et~irely -.mtl r~plac~d aa fallows: 5. P~rapaph ~(d} ~ hca:by 4~'~ctcd in its erairray and ;'(:pla:cd ~s folk~w-~ $(d) immediately upon written notice by. Ttmiml if Ibc Building; O~ the Amcnna F~lities a~ dcs~roy~ or ~g~ ~d ~ nm 6. pavag~afdx g(t) i.-. hereby added a.~ fullo~.,: 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 3732926693 T-#O~ZLE ENGZHEERIHG ~009/017 lO. T~7~. ! -'m,llotd shall pay whcn duc aU real pmpcrty t~c~ for aw. Prope~y. ~cludmtr, d~c prcmisc~. In O~c cvcal Lbat 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 9732928893 T-#OBZLE EHGIHEERZNG ~010/017 LANDLOP, D: 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 97329288G3 T-MOBILE ENGINEERING ~011/017 Thc Prop~rt}' Scctio~ L~ I. Blocl( 3. Lot. 3~.00!, 37~ ~8 & 20 ~wk~o ~ a lin. ~llel wl~'t~sa~e~lT l~e~ ~v. ~. [ of tho ~g lel~,.~o~ ~v~ue ~ feet ~o'i~'~p~,m~de~'o~>-' 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 9?32928893 T-#OBILE £flBINEERINO ~012/017 . ."~.~.8_,TE PLAN e.. ,~. 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 9732828893 T-NOBILE ENGINEERING [~014/017 03/03/2004 11:47 FAX 8732928893 T-#OBILE ENGINEERING ~015/017 03/03/200, 11:49 FAX 9732929633 T-MOBTLE ENglHEERYNG 1~016/017 (Use thi~ .nfface for nola~. :mqtnp/~) IN~ ~.f~ imtiridt~al] STATE OF COUNTY OF ) b~foa'e n~: on by Nou~t Public Prim Name (Usc this space fm nol;~/.stamp/aeal) /Notary bl#ck fnr Tenant] C'OUNTY OF__{,.,)_/Z~2D.__ ) J certify that ] know c,r havc satin;factory cvidence bt Jo~ph M. Walrd~ is ~ pctaon who appearr, d bcforc mc. and ~'}id person actmowledgcd Ih;It he si~ this ireltrun~:m, on oath .~ate. d thai h¢ was authnrizexl to excc. ulc , , 03/03/2004 tt:48 FAX 9732828893 T-~OB~LE EHGIHEERZN$ ~017/017 Li:~bJlit¥ Company, to be 11~9 fr~: and voh~nlitry act of' ~N part), fnr No~a~ Public ~ Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 7:41 AM To: 'Jacalyn Fleming' Subject: RE: Omnipoint Mattituck Hi Jacalyn, I will recommend to the Planning Board (PB) we start SEQRA. I do not have authority to place items on the agenda. To clarify the procedure, the review must be voted on by the PB before the item can be placed on the agenda for a public hearing. The PB gave the Ok at Monday's work session. Please get the information to us. Thanks Bruno ..... Original Message ..... From: ]acalyn Fleming [mailto:jfleming@mmnrlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 4:20 PM To: bruno.semon @town.southold.ny.us Subject: Omnipoint Mattituck As per our previous discussion, please schedule our application for a SEQRA coordination determination on Monday, March 8, 2004. We will submit revised plans and a response to the Board's comment letter dated February 11, 2004, on or before March 8th.. Thank you for your assistance. 3/4/2004 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREME}IS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 11,2004 Ms. Jacalyn R. Fleming Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Re 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, N. Y. 11743 RE: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM: 1000-141-03-38.1 Zone: LI Proposed Telecommunication Tower Dear Ms. Fleming: The Planning Board reviewed your site plan application at a Work Session on Monday, February 10; 2004,and raised the following concerns: 1 .The site plan ~[awings must be at a scale of 1" equals 20'. 2. Please clarif'! if any portion of the tower (flagpole) exceeds 100'. Drawing SP-2 shows a globe, which appears to rise above the top of the structure. 3. The surrounding zoning districts, and the names of the adjacent property owners must be shown on the site plan. 4. Please clarify how access to the tower will be provided -will there be a written agreement with Mr. Penny allowing maintenance personnel to enter the site, which is normally gated? Please explain emergency access in case of fire or explosion in the equipment area. Upon receipt of this information, the Planning Board can continue to process your application. Please contact this office at 765-1938 if there are any further questions on this matter. Very truly yours, dhouso Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JEi~ILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Februaw 11,2004 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District P.O. Box 666, Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan, dated 9/16/02, for Omnipoint Communications, Inc., 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck. SCTM# 1000-141-3-38,1 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any fire- wells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation at to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether, firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Victor L'Eplatteni(~r Site Plan Reviewer eric. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Date: James A. Richter, R.A. Office of Town Engineer Victor L'Eplattenier, Site Plan Revi~ Site Plan-Omnipoint Communications Proposed Communications Antenna Located at 125855 Sound Ave, Mattituck SCTM: 1000-141-03-38.1 Zone: LI/' / February 11,2004 Please review the attached new site plan for the proposed Omnipoint communications antenna within the Penny lumberyard with respect to drainage and engineering issues. This site plan, dated 9-16-02, has been reviewed by the ZBA(Appl No 5357),and an interpretation was made overturning the Buildings Departments Notice of Disapproval dated April 1,2003. Please advise this office upon completion of your review. The Planning Board has not set a date for a final Public Meeting on this project. Please call me at 765-1938 if you need any further information. MUNLEY~ MEADE~ NIELSEN dr IlL January29, 2004 By Hand Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, and Member of the Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Attention: Mr. Bruno Semon Re: Site Plan Application Omnipoint Communications, Inc. SCTM # 1000: Section: 141, Block: 03, Lot: 38.1 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952 Planning Boar~ Dear Chairman Orlowski: We represent Omnipoint Communications, Inc. in the above-captioned Site Plan Application. Enclosed please find the following documents: 1. Original and nine (9) copies of the Site Plan Application form; 2. Ten signed and sealed copies of the Site Plan with Elevations and drawings of the proposed cabinets and antennas; 3. Ten (10) copies of the catalog "cut sheets" of the proposed antennas; 4. Original and nine (9) copies of the Full Environmental Assessment Form; 5. Ten (10) copies of Omnipoint's existing wireless facility plan; 6. Ten (10) copies of the photographs of adjoining buildings; 7. Site Plan Application filing fee. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. We will contact you shortly to discuss scheduling this application for a work session. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE By: ~ ~tacalyn R. Fleming Enclosures APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ! Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora George Homing Ruth D. Oliva , Ghai~voman Vincent Orlando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net RECEIVED FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION ,' MEETING OF NOVEMBER 6, 2003 Appl. No. 5357 - Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Property Location: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck; 1000-141-3-38.1~ Date of Public Hearing: August 2t, 2003 $0uth01d Town In the Matter of Omnipoint Communications, Inc., based on the Building Inspector's determination rendered in the April 1, 2003 Notice of Disapproval and for an interpretation of the Code of the Town of Southold, Ch. 100, Article XVI, Section 100- 162C(3), pertaining to the location of a telecommunications tower "300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies" in the LI Light Industrial District. FINDINGS OF FACT BASIS OF APPEAL: The Appellant, Omnipoint Communications Inc., is appealing the Building Inspector's April 1, 2003 Notice of Disapproval for an Interpretation. The April 1, 2003 Notice of Disapproval denied an application for a building permit to construct a telecommunications tower for the following reason: The proposed telecommunications tower on this 3.872 acre parcel in the Light Industrial District is not permitted pursuant to Article ×VI, Section 100-162 which states: "No wireless communications facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold except as follows: (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers are a permitted use, provided that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the existing grade and provided that the base of the tower is located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. The cell tower is proposed to be located +/-137 feet from adjacent lot (SCTM#1000-141-3-35) and +/-158 feet from adjacent lot (SCTM #1000~141-3-39), both of which are historical properties listed on the Society for th(~ Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southold Historic Properties. RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant maintains that the building inspector erred in interpreting 100-162C(3) to require a minimum 300 ft. distance from the tower to any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. Applicant maintains that the only issue for interpretation is whether the list of landmark properties or districts to which reference is made in Section 100-162C(3) may be interpreted to include properties found on the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southold Historic Properties, which list is expressly referenced in Section 56-7(A) of the Town Code, rather than it being a federal, state or town agency list. The Applicant requests the Board of Appeals to reverse the inspector's determination on this basis. ~' Pagl~ 2 - November 6, 2003 ,~ Interpretation/100-162C(3) Omnipoint Communications 141-3-38.1 WHEREAS, The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on 8/21/03, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject property is a 3.82-acre parcel located on the north side of Sound Avenue, Mattituck, SCTM 1000-141-3-38.1, now or formerly referred to as Penny Lumber. The property is zoned Light Industrial (LI). APPLICABLE CODE PROVISIONS: WHEREAS, the following sections of Chapter 100 (Zoning) are pertinent to this request: Section 100-162C(3): C. In Industrial Districts including LI and LIO, a wireless communication facility is subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers are a permitted use, provided that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the existing grade and provided that the base of the tower is located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. ACTION OF THE BOARD: WHEREAS, the board has further carefully considered the following evidence and testimony: 1. The question presented to the board is whether or not the Building Inspector erred when noting Section 100-162C(3) as the reason that the base of the tower must be located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town aqencies, more specifically CTM Parcels 1000-140-3-35 and 1000- 140-3-39. 2. The applicant's reasons.are set forth in both oral and written argument in the record. The applicant's basic argument is that: (a) Chapter 56 (Landmark Preservation) Section 56-7(A) expressly refers to the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southold Historic Properties (referred to as the S.P.LI.A. list), and does not apply to this application because it was not invoked into Chapter 100 (Zoning) Section 100-162C(3) as the Town Legislature may have intended, that (b) only town properties listed pursuant to the Town's Landmark Designation process may be considered for the purposes of Section 100- 162C(3), and the applicant's property, CTM 1000-141-3-38.1, is not listed as a landmark site, that (c) the two properties noted in the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval are not listed on a federal, state or town agency list. 3. The board agrees. Page 3 - November 6, 2003 Interpretation/100-162C(3) Omnipoint Communications 141-3-38.1 4. It is further noted that the Board of Appeals is without authority to modify the Code under any circumstances. BOARD RESOLUTION: Based on the above clear language of the Town Code sections, the board finds that the Building Inspector's Notice of Disapproval was not properly issued. NOW, on motion by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Tortora, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Appeals Interprets Article XVI, Section 100-162C(3) to mean that Section 56-7 does not apply to this application because the S.P.L.I.A. list was not invoked as a list into Section 100-162C(3), as Town Legislature may have intended, and Reverses the Building Inspector's April 1, 2003 Notice of Disapproval. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Tortora, and Orlando (Vice Chairman). Absent was Member Horn~g. T_~is,~s~l~.n was duly adopted (4-0). Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 11//~2/03 Approved for Filing ,APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora George Homing Ruth D. Oliva~ Chairwoman Vincent Orlando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INCOMPLETE NOTICE APPEAL BASED ON BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEW DETERMI Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 OCT 3 0 2003 I IATION (~ ~E) Application ,o-..~.__CTM l ~/" 3 -.~ o~. [ Acreage: 3, ~c~ Zo, ,e: ~ Planning Board Date of I~ufidlng~spector Dlsal~provah Initial Apphcaflon: In reviewing the above-referenced application, it is d. etermlned that additional review by the Building Inspector of the site sketch dated ~'-/G,-O;L /u~c~d ~-c~.~b-3 may be necessary and is recommended that a written or formal request by you be submitted to the Building Department under with respect to the following provisions of the Zoning Code. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate our office staff representative assigned to your file at (631) 765-1809. Zoning Code Provisions (seven sets of applications, below): (y) Section ,o0-lb5+~f°a°r~Ja~2application~_--~/~ ( ) Section 100-165B Telecommunications Tower only: Variance application if the entire property Is less than sq. ft. in size. Please clarify 80,000 sq. ft. of land for each principle use, existing and proposed. ( ) Section 100-32, Bulk Area Schedule: additional minimum land area for additional uses. Please clarify sq. ft. of land for each of the multiple uses proposed, with flllng of variance application If the entire property Is less than in size. ( ) Survey map with construction areas and ali existing construction, with setbacks between buildings and property lines confirmed by surveyor. ( ) Rough diagram or sketch with building height (# of stories and distance from ground to top/ridge detail; also landscaping proposed In the area of the construction. Letter confirming last date of review by other Involved agencies for presubmlsslon comments. ( ) Updated single-and-separate search dated back to April 23, 1957 , certified by a title Insurance company insuring the Town for a minimum of $25,000, together with copies of deeds originally craatlng the lot lines of this property. ~ Other: O,.J~L- 1.~ ~ ~'~ ~ .,~r~.) ~__~'~'_~.~/.~-o ~ Dated: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO V~ILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: October 27, 2003 To: Ms. Oliva, Chairwoman of Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman of Southold Town Planning Board Re: Appeal # 5357 Omnipoint Communications (Penny) 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-141-3-38.1 In reference to the memo request for information dated August 21, 2003 and a request from Jacalyn Flemming to have the Planning Board (P.B.) review this incomplete application at a work session. The Planning Board (PB) held a work session on October 20, 2003 and would like to offer the following comments on the above monopole tower site plan. Please nete that the applicant has not paid a site plan application fee or submitted an application - thus the PB does not have a site plan application before it. We agree with the Building Inspector Notice of Disapproval that both SCTM: 1000-140-3-35 & 1000-140-3-39 properties are on the S.P.L.I.A. list. We also would like to refer to the Town code section part 56-7 which allows the S.P.L.I.A. list to be used for a designated landmark (see below.) Attached are local law copies; No.13-1995 and No. 1-2000. "§ 56-7. Review of building permit applications. A. Every application for a building permit for the reconstruction or alteration of, including but not limited to demolition or addition to a designated landmark, property inventoried by S.P.L.I.A. (Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities), or property within a designated and listed historic district, or property otherwise designated as a landmark by town, state or federal agencies shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the Commission for its comments and recommendations. No building permit shall be issued until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations with the Building Inspector and has mailed a copy thereof to the applicant or until the passage of 14 days from the date of referral, whichever shall first occur. [Amended 6-13-1995 by L.L. No. 13-1995; 1-18-2000 by L.L. No. 1-2000]" Page Two, October 27, 2003 Research shows the last approved site plan was June 10, 1985 on a plan dated June 6, 1985 for SCTM: 1000-141-3-20, 37, & 38, therefore an amended site plan will be required. (See attached copy of P.B. resolution and letter from Building Department to certify approved plan) The proposed site plan will need to be certified by the Building Inspector before the P.B. can issue final approval. The P.B. is concerned that the proposed monopole tower wl~'¢ot meet the · requ~i'ements of section 100-165 and 100-166 of the Town Code and recommend review of the sections. The P.B. feels these communication towers would best be located on public owned properties such as schools and fire district where the entire community benefits. Please keep us up to date on the project. Thanking you in advance. Cc: file, BD(MV), ZBA Enc. ~ Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 12, 1985 Mr. George L. Penny, P.O. Box 57 Main Road Greenport, NY 11944 IV Re: Site Plan for George L. Penny, Inc. Dear Mr. Penny: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board, Monday, June 10, 1985. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the site plan for George L. Penny, Inc. located, at Mattituck for the construction of a storage building, a garage addition, and the relocation of an existing garage. Plan dated as amended June 6, 1985 and certified by the Building Department. ' - Enclosed is a copy of the site plan which indicates the relocation of the'existing garage in red ink, these cannot be signed by the Chairman. Therefore, will you please forward three surveys including the garage relocation. After they are signed, one will be returned to you. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. cc: Building Department Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKIt JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary TOWN OF OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR - P.O. BOX 728 TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL. 765-1802 June 10,1985 Planning Board Town of Southold Main Rd. Southold, N.Y. 11971 Subject: .George L. Penny, Inc. Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 Revised Site Plan, June 6,1985 Gentlemen: This will certify the revised site plan herewith in meeting zoning regulations. EH:dsm Yours Truly,/ Edward Hindermann Building Inspector Town of Southold PC/Codeb° ok for Windows § 56-7. Review of building permit applications. A. Every application for a building permit for the reconstruction or alteration of, including but not limited to demolition or addition to a designated landmark, property inventoried bY · · ..' P.~S~(Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities), or property within a ~'i. designated and listed historic district, or property otherwise designated as a landmark by~ .- ' · town, state or federal agencies shall be refer~ed by the Building Inspector to the Commission for its comments and recommendations. No building permit shall be issued until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations with the Building Inspector and has mailed a copy thereof to the applicant or until the passage of 14 days from the date of referral, whichever shall first occur. [Amended 6-13-1995 by L.L.~No. 13~ 1-18-2000 by L.L. N___o../-200~0] Local Law Filing . ~v~x o r.. _..s.p..u.t.~.o_Ld. ................................................................... Local Law NO. -- J -~- .................... of the year ~.9-9--S-- local law.. Ln.~R e I a t I ° n-L°.. -L-a-n-d- .1~- .a--r -k- -P- -r-e- -s- -e-r. Y-a-t- 1-°- -n .................... ~lt~ or.._S.o_u.t_.h.o. Ld_ ............................................... as roUo~s: Town Chapter 56 (Landmark Preservation) of the Code of the Town of Southold is hereby amended as follows: Section 57-7(A) is hereby amended as follow.s: A. Every appliCation for a building permit for the reconstruction or alteration of or addition to a landmark listed by S.P.LI.A., federal, state or town agencies shall be referred by the Building Inspector to the CommiSsion for its comments and recommendations. No build- ing permit shall .be issued until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations with the Building Inspector and has mailed a copy thereof to the applicant or until the passage of fourtee~ (!4) days f~orn the date of referral, whichever shall first occur. II. This Local Law shall taka effect upon filing with the Secretary of State. (If =d~'itlonol space Is needed, att, ach pages the sam~ size as this sheet, and number each.) 1. (Final adoption by local legislative body 0nly,) I hewby certify that the local law annexe~ hereto, de.situated a~ocal l~'w No..-~-------~ ........................ of 19-%5--- of~ ~2~ ~e)~ .t~gro ~v.,~'a~ at ..._-~...u~h_o.!~. ...................... ........................ ~,~ duly pe~ed by ae .... ~..~.O~.d. ........... -~.~..2..~'..-~o{i..-J-~-rL~.--l~..-. 19-9.-5- in acx:ordance with the applicable provisions of.l.aw. ~.. (Passage by local legislative body with approval, no disapproval or repassage at~r disapproval by the ElecUve Chief Executive Officer*.) [ 5ereby ce~ni£y that the local law azmexed hereto, designated as local mw No ................................. of O[ the (Cou at yXCRy)(Towa)(Vilh ge) of .............................................. was duly passed by the ..................................... on ............... 19 *-- and was (approvedXnot appwved)(r~pez.sed after disappwval) by the .................................... and was deemed duly adopted on .................. 19----, ia accordance with the applicable ptovisio~ of law. 3. (~na[ adoption.by referendum.) I hereby cent fy that th~ local law annexed hereto, designated as local law Nd. ................................ of 19--I of the (County)(City){Town)OAllage) o[ ..................................................... was du y passed by he ................................................. on ............... 19----, and was (appwoec0(not appvoved)(repassed after disapproval) by the ............................................. on- ................. 19 ..... Such local [aw was submitted to the people by reason of a (mandatory)(permlssive) ~efereedum, and received the affirmative vote of a majority o[ the qualified elec~om voting thereon at the ~eneralXspec/ulXannual) election held on ............... 19---.. in accordance with Ihe applicable provis/ons of law. 4. (Subject to permissive refer~ndmn and final adoption because no valid petition waz filed requ~Ung referendum.) 1 hereby certify that the local law armex~l hereto, d~iguated as local law No ................................... of 19 ...... of the (Coumy){Cily){~own)(Village) of ............................................................. :... a~a~ duly p~sed by th* ................................................... on .................. 19..-- . and was (appmvcd)(nol approved)~r~passed disapproval) by the ................................................. on .................. 19 .... Such local law was subiect ~o permissive referendum and no valid petition requesting such referendum was filed as of .................. lg---k . in accordance with ~he applicable prov/sions of law. Elective Chie£Execut/ve Officer means or includes the chief executive officer ora county elected on a countT- wide basis or~ if there be none. the chairperson of the county leglslaUve body, the mayor of a city or village, or the super~isor ul' a town where such officer is vested with the power to approve or veto local laws or ordinances. (2) ~ .,~. (City local law ¢oncernln~ Chatter revtslon proposed by ~etltlon.) hereby certify that the local Mw annexed berate, d~i~tted ~s local law No .............................. of 19 ...... o£ the Cky of .......................................... havin$ been subm~tmd to m~t~ndum pu~suaut to the provisions of s~cfion (3~(37) of th~:Munlcipal ~ome Rule L~w~, s.ud ba~tng ~ceived tim a f~nm~ t ~v~ vine of a majodty o£ the ~l~fied electors o~ such city voting thereon ~tt the (spechl)(~rnend) election held on ................. 19----, ~. (County local law concerning ~lopflon of Charter.) ! he.by ~ t~t the I~l law a~x~ hereto, ~i~l~ ~ 1~i lzw No ....................... of 19--~ ~f the ~n~ of .................................... 'S~ of New Yo~ ~g ~en su~ed ~t ~e ~neml El~on of No~m~r ............ 19-.-. pu~nt to s~io~ 5 ~d 7 o~ ~ioa 3~ of the ~u~p~ Home ~e ~w, ~d ~g ~ved ~ ~ve vote of a majo~ of ~ q~ed ele~om of ~ of~d ~ty ~ a umt ~ a ~j~ o~ ~ ~n~h~ed el~to~ of the to~ or.id ~un~ ~de~ ~ a umt .~t~g at ~d ~naml elecfio~ ~e ~m~v~ ~ uny o~ au~o~ fo~ of ~ ~op~on ~ ~ f~low~, pl~e p~de ~ app~p~a~ ~o~) lilY.er ci~ t~t I ~ ~a~d ~e p~g 1~ ~w ~ ~e od~ on file ~ :~ n ~ ~pt t~e~m and of t~ w~le of s~h ~11~ ~w ~nd ~ ~.n :~i~d in ~m~p~.L ...... . a~v*.. Judith T, Terry, 'Town Clerk ~m: June lq~ 1995 · [~CeL-Ciflclflou I~ be ezeca~d by County A~mrneys Corporation Counsel, Town A~orney, VHlnge Attorney or ther authorized attorney of loadlty.) Lthe undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing local law contains th,. cor~ct text and that aH proper proceedings ye been had or t~.~n ~or the enuctmeflt oE the Io¢~1 h~v anaexed hereto. ~ L~ury L.Dowd. Town Attorney of Southold June lq, 1995 (z) ~se ~ fora ~ ~e a Io~1 hw wi~ ~e ~ of ~) ~ of hw should be ~ven ~ am~ ~ not include ~r ~ elimi~t~ and do not ~c i~li~ or uM~fi~ng to in~te new ~tter. ~1 Law No ................... 3- ................ of ~e y~r 2~ law .~f..t ha ._C_ode. ~.Y_b.e..[~wn..(~C ~S~u~kto] d~ ............................................... Be it enacted by the ............................ -T-.q-w-.n-..-B--°--a. -r-d- ......................................... of the I~ or .................................. _S..o..u..t.h..o..I.d. ........ ~ ......................... as fbliows: § 56-3. Definitions.. As used in this ohapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE - The quality of a building or structure based on its date of ereotion, style and scardty of same~ qual~ of design, preseat condition and ~ppearance or. other. ~aracter~'cs that embody the distinctive ~haracteristics of a type, period or method of conStruction. COMMISSION - Th~ Landmark Preservation Commission established pursuant to this DESIGNATED LANDMARK - A landmark in the Town of Southold desiSmsted pu,~aant to the provisions offl~is Chapter EXTERIOR ARCI~TECTURAL FEATURES - The architectural style, design, geaend nmmgement and componeats of nil of the outer surfaces of any building or structure. I-HSTORIC DISTRICT - Any area which contains places, sites, structures or buildings which have a special character and ambience or historical value or aesthetic ir~erest and Wliich represent one (I) or more periods or styles of architecture oran era of history and whie, h ca~ ~uch area to cons~'tute a distinct seotinn of the town. [Added 4-5-1994 by L.L. No. 4-1994] I-ff~TORI~AL $IGN~iCANCE - The quality of a place, si~ building, district or ~ ,breed upo its ~d~cation with historic persons or events m the Town of ,I pr~o~ ~ c~. : . S~U~ - ~y ~ly of ~s ~ a ~m~c~on ~ of ~m~nent ~ ~ ~ ~ or ~ ~alnS ~&-Ss: S~.OF ~C~'I'~ [Md~ ~5-1994 by L.L. No. 4-1994] - S~le ~ one (l) of ~e ~o~v~ o~om: ~e N~o~ ~a~ of ~fic Pla~. B. ~gc ~e~ B~S C. ~odc ~e~ En~g ~rd, 'U~t~ Stat~ Dep~ of ~e ~t~or, Nafio~ P~ S~. D. DM~on for ~ofic ~e~afio~ N~ Yo~ S~te ~ of~ ~fion. Na~o~ T~ for ~ofic Prese~fion. S~ of ~Mt~r~ ~o~. § $6-7. Review ofbuildin8 permit applications. A. Every application for a building permit for the reconstruction or alteration of, including but not limited to demolition or addition to a Designated Landmark, pwpe~'y /nventofied by S.P.L.LA (Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities), or property within a dest~onated and listed I~storic District, or pwperty otherwise designated as a landmarli by Town, State or Federal agencies shall be referred by the Building Inspector tO the Commission for its comments and recommendations. NO buildln~ permit shall be issued until the Commission has filed its written comments and reconnnandatlons with the Building Inspector and has mailed a copy thereof to the applicant or until the passage of fourteen (14) days from the date of referral, whichever sh,II first occur. [Amended 6-13-199S byLL. No. 13-1995] B. The application for a buildin~ permit shall not be deemed complete until the Commission has filed its written comments and recommendations or until the passage of fourteen (14) days fi.om the date of referral of the building permit application to the Commission, whichever shall first occur. C. In reviewin8 an applieation for a building permit referred to it, the Commission shs~ll consider the effect that the contemplated work will have On the exterior architectural features of the desi~ated landmark If the Commission recommends modification in'the contemplated work in order to preserve the architectural features of the structure, it shall su~e,st ~uch mod~cafions as will mlnlmiT~ the costs, riffle and inconvenience to' the OWII~. D. In review~ an application for a building permit, ~ho 'COmmission shall consider only the exterior architectural features of the b,.nldigg or struoturo. E. The comments and recommandafions of the Commission with respect to building permit applications referred to it pursuant to this section ghell: be 'deemed advisory only. The owner's rejection of or refusal to comply with Such comments and recomlnendations shall not delay or in any way impede the otherv~se favorable a~don on the issuance of a permit. F. Nothing contained.in this chapter shsll be deemed to prevent the ordlnsry and necassary ,.msintanance and repair of any exterior architectural features of ~ which d°es not involve a silplifleant change in :desJt~ material or outward This Local.Law shall imme *dy upon filing with the Secretary of SUite. (ta) (Complet~ the cartlflcat. ~n the paragraph that applies go the flit ~f this local law and strike oi~t that which I~ not appliCable.) 1. (Final adoption by local legislative body only.) I h~reby oeflify that the local law annexed hereto, desiguated~es local law No ............... .1 ...................of 2q{lO.. or,he (~t)(~ ~w.n)(~lga~ of----:---:--L---:-~---~?h--°-]-d- ........................... was duly passed by the ......... ~.~...~.6j~_r.~ .............. on.J.a..~._z~-~r..~._l.~., z-~,~n accordanc~ with thc applicable pmvisior~ oflaw. .., {." }. ('Passage by local I~glslative body with approval, no disapproval or repassage after disapproval ~ by the Elective Chief Executive Officer*.) I hereby cezttfy that the local law annexed hereto, designated as local law N .................................... of 19 ...... of the (County)(City)('l'own){'Village) of ................................................................. was duly passed by the ............. ~ ................................. on .................. 19 ---, and was (approved)(not appl~ved)(rcpassed after disapproval) by tha ............ ; .................................. and was deemed duly adopted on .................. 19-..., in acco~lance with the applicable provisions of law. 3. (Final adoption by referendum.) I hereby r~rtify that the local law annexed hat, to, designated as local'law No. :- .................................. of 19 ...... of the (CountyXCity)('lbwn)(Village) of ............................................................ was duly passed by the .................................................. on ................. 19----, and was (approved)(not apptx~'~d)(repassed ai~r disapp:ovai) by the ................................................ on ...................19 ..... Such local law was submitted to the people by re. ssoa of a (mandato~y)(pexm~ivo) referendum, and z~c~ived tho affumative vote of a majority of the qtmllf'ted elactota voting thar~on at th~ (genond){speclslXannual) election held On .................. l!l.-, in ac~o~daa~ with tho applicablo-provlsiom Of law. 4. (Sulgect to:permissive re[erendUm and final adoption becaus~ no ~'alid p~tition was llled requesting r~er~dum.) I I~by c~rti~y that tho focal law am~xed h~reto, designated as local law No ................................... of 19 ..... of th~ (CounlyXCity)(rown)Ohlisl~) of ............................................................... was duly.pasaed by th( ............................................... on ................. 19--, and wes (appro~'ed)(not npproved)(~pnsasd aft~' disapproval) by tho~-~ot~o..~-- .................... on .............. 19 .... Such local law was subj~c~ t~ pemzissivo m~l~ndum aad ao valid.!~, tition. _t~.qu~sting suoh mf~rondum was filed es of ............. : ....19...-, in acco~e~ Witli.tllo applic~blo provisions of law. the sup~,flsot* of' re;town wi~e.L-e such otflcee b Vested with the po~ to apprOve or veto. locar laws o~u~xumsn. 5. (City local law concerning Cha..er revision propel'ed by petition.) ! hereby certify that the local l~w annexed heredo, designated as local law No .................................... of 19 ..... of the City.of ................ ~ ........................... having been submitted to referendum pursuant to the provisions el section (3~')(37) of the Municipal Home Rule Law, and having ~eceived thc affirmative vote of a majority of the qualified el~i~ of such city voting thereon at thc (special){gcaeral) election held on ................... 19--.-, became operative. 6. (County local law concerning adoption of Charter.) I hereby certify that thc loCal law annexed hereto, designated as local law No .................................... of 19 ..... of the County of .................................................... State of New York, haviag been submitted to the elector. at the General Hlecflon of November ..................... 19----, pursuant to subdivisions 5 and 7 of section 33 of the Municipal Home Rule Law,.aad having [eceived'the aft'umative vote o[ a,majodty of the qualified electors of the cit. ins ,Of said' county,~ s unit:and.a majority of the qu. alified electors of the towns of said county considered as a uni! voting at said general ciection, becan~e operative. (If any other authorized form of final adoption has been followed, please provide an appropriate certification.) I further certify that I have compared the preceding local law with the otlginal on file in this office and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original local law, end was finally addpted in the manner ii dicsted in paragraph ..... ]-.-., above. Eli'zab~,th A. Neville, Town Clerk (Seal) Dale: c~'~'~c~ ''~; ,~,OZ~ ~9 (Certification to be executed by COunty Attorney, Corporation Counsel, Town Attorney, Village Attorney or other authorized attorney of locaUty.) couwgY oz SUFFOLK I, tbe undersigned, heir. by certify ~t ~o ~m~ l~l~m~ tc ~ te~ ~d t~t all pm~r p~ ha~ ~n ~d oC~ken ~r t~ e~nt o~ 1~~ . ' Greo~- Yakaboski. E~q__ Town Aftnrm~ X?X~.a o! Seuthold (3) STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTHENT OF STATE 4 I STATE ~TREE"F ALBANY, NY I ~'2~. 1-0001 · "~Febmary 15, 20110 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN HALL 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 RE: Town of Southold, Local Law 1, 2000, tided 02/04/2000 The above referenced material was received and filed by this office as indicated. law filing forms will be forWarded upon request. Additional local Sincerely, Janice G. Durfee Principal File Cleri~ Bureau of State Records (518) 474-2755 JGD:ml Ms. Ellabetfl A. Neville: The following matm~ has been received and will be ~ for inclusion in your Code as supplemental pages (where a43pticable): General Code Publishms Phone: 800/636-8834 Tow~ of Southold C/O Clerks Office PO Box1179 Sound. NY 11971 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANA/~EMENT OFFIC~..i{ FREEDOM OF ENFORMATION OFFICER Town H~ll, 53095 Ms/n Hoad P.O. Box 1179 Souflwld, New York 11971 Fax I631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CI.E~K TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 2, 2000 CERTIFIED MAIL ~T REQUESTFA New York State Department of State State Records and Law Bureau · 1 State Street Albany, New York 12231 Re: Local Law Numbers I through 3 of 2000 Town of Southold, Suffolk County Dear Si~s: In accordance with provisions of Section 27 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, I an enclosing herewith certified copies of Local Law Numbers 1 2, and 3 of 2000 of the Town of Southold suitable for filing in your office. I would appreciate if you would send me a recelpt indicating the filing of the enclosures in your off ce Thank you. Very truly yours, [li~'abeth A. Ne¥ille Southold Town Clork STATE OF NEW YORK) )ss: of Mattltuck, In said being .:uly sworn, says that ha/aha la clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weeldy puldlshed ~t I~.G~u,ck, in the Town of ~ of Suffolk and 8rate of New York, annexed la a printed has been regularly published in said Newspaper week for t succe~- commencing on the 20 PO JOHN R. BRI80~I ( PUBLIC, STATE OF NEW YORK QUALIFIEO iN SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY*31 ~O,a~ STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE. Town Clerk of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 4th day of she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice Is a true copy, in a proper anti substantial manner, in a most public place In the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Boardt Southold Town Hallz 53095 Main Roadr Southoldt New York. LEGAL NOTICE - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HERRING ON LOCAL LAW RE: LANDMARK PRESERVATION. D~te of Public Hearing: ~9:00 ]~.M., Tuesday Snaury 18, 2000. Ellzaibeth A-./Neville Southold Town Clerk SWorn to before me this ~ day of ~:7:-,,,,,~.. , ' N6tary 4~ubllc PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD IANUARY 1 ~, 2OOO 5:00 P.M, ON THI] PROPOSED"LOCAL LAW IN RELATION TO AMENDING CHAPTER. 56 ENTITLED "LANDMARK PRESERVATION'. Absent: Supmdsor Jean W. Cochran Justice LouisaP. Evans Councilman William D. Moore Councilman Brian G. Mmphy Councilman Craig A. Richter Town Cl~rk Elizabeth A. Neville Town Attorney Grcgo~ F. Yakaboski Councilman John M. Romenelli SUPERVISOR COCHR. AN: - Louisa, would you mad thc public notice. IUSTICB EVANS: "Public Notice is h~reby g/van that thea'o ha~ been pre~mted to thc Town Board of the Town of Sunthold, Suffolk Couaty, Now York, on th~ 2t" day of Denember, t999, A Lo~I., Law entiti~d "A Local Law tn Relafign tq Amending Chapter 5~ enlffied "Landmark Preservation of the Code of the T°wn of g6at~01~i~ Noti¢~ {s further ~ivan that the T0wn.Board of the Tovm of Southold wilt hold. a i~tbll~ lreltr~g on tho afo,r~ai~l Local Law at the Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southok[, Ne~'y0flq ~n the 18t~ day of J~maary, 21~00, a~ 5 d)ll p,M., at which time all intea'cstod persons will bo hat& This proposed "Loewi Law in Relation to Chapter 56 E~ndmark Preservation" reads as follows: A Local Law in Relation to Amendin~ Chapter 56 entitled "Landrthark Praservafion" of tho Cooke of the Town of S0uthotd. BE iT ENACTED by:the Town Board of the Town of Southold~as follows: (14) da~ ~m~e:~e~of ~ ~ ~sll ~ ~. [~ ~13-1~5 by L.L. No. 13-1~5] B. ~e ~p~gou for a b~ ~ Co~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~d ~om or ~ ~e ?~ of fo~04) l ~(~m~of~of C. ~ ~ ~ ~pi~on for a D. In reviewi~ an application for a buildi~ p~rmit, the Commission shall consid~ only the ext~io~ architectural f~_~_ ,~e~ ofth~ E. Tho colmaents and recommends_tlo~s of the Commi~ion with re,peet to boildlnE permit appllca~io~$ re~erred to it pursuant ~o this secgou ,hnll b~ deemed advisor~ only. The Owr~s rejecgon of or refusal to comply with such co,n~ and recomm,.~'~ions shall not delaF O~in any way imp~l~ the oth~vtse i~orabl~ a~tion on the issuance of a building permit. F. Notl~ ~Ont,sined in this c!~pter ,1~. I~ deemed to provera tl~ 0~6.,~ and necessary ma~-ce and repair of any exmior ~hitecOmd feamr~ of landmark which ~oez not involve a ~ c-hsnEe in desi~, material or outward appearance thareo~ 473889 SOUTHOLD 141.-3-38.1 12585 SOU~ AVE = OWNER & MAILING INFO ===I=MISC PENNY GEORGE L INC IRS-SS C/O GEO L PENNY IV I 1 MAIN ROAD I BANK NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY DATE : 10/27/2003 ~ SCHOOL MATTITUCK SCHOO~ ROLL SEC TAXABLE RCLS 444 LUMBER YD/ML TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 14 I .............. ASSESSMENT DATA ........... I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 5,800 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 37,700 COUNTY 37,700 GREENPORT NY 11944 0185702 **PRIOR** TOWN 37,700 I ILAND 5,800 SCHOOL 37,700 I ITOTAL 37,700 ==DIMENSIONS ===l ....... SALES INFORMATION .................................. ACRES 3.89 IBOOK 3 SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 00144 PR OWNER ==- .... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ..... CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE 1 030 1~071 IT 020 I$~011 Fl=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Date: Oc+ i 7 zoo ~ Name: Mailing Address: SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: Query: (Please be specific abodt the information you need. Provide suppoding documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) For Office Use Only: Routed to: //~ SOUTHOLD TRANSPORTATION COMSVIISSION tTovm 53095 Maht Road F~ ~ 76~3136 Date: October 14, 2003 To: Southold Planning Board _ .,,¢ ~(~ , From: Ncboysha R. Brashicl~ Chairman ~ Re: LlPA Wind Turbine Project / As you are aware, SR 25 is a New York State Scenic Byway so designated by New York State Legislation in 2002. As such, the viewsbed along this road must be protected given the scenic, historic and cnitutal importance of the old "King's Highway." Thc proposed project is to be located within thc viewshed of SR 25. Thc Commission is concerned that the dcsig~ and, particularly the placement, of such a tmbinc would have a lasting negative effect on thc Byway. During its review, the Planning Board should ensure that the viewshad be as minimally impacted as possivle. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: August 19, 2003 To: Mrs. Tortora, Chairwoman of Zoning Board of Appeals From: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman of Southold Town Planning Board Re: Appeal # 5357 Omnipoint Communications (Penny) 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck, N.Y. SCTM: 1000-141-3-38.1 In reference to the memo request for information dated August 21, 2003. The Planning Board (PB) held a work session on August 18, 2003 and would like to offer the following comments on the above site plan. 1. The PB currently has no site plan application on file and would like a chance to review the site plan requirements. Therefore we requests that the ZBA hold open the public meeting and copy us with the meetings transcript for review. 2. Under Southold Town code section 100-162 ( C ) site plan approval is required. Please keep us up to date on thc project. Thanking you in advance. Cc: file, BD(MV), ZBA WORK SESSION AGENDA~1~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD August 18, 2003 at 4:30 pm SITE PLANS SCTM: 1000-55-2-23 RE: 1) Site plan final sign off. Orient Coffee Company Main Road Orient, NY SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 RE: 1) SCHD Board of review Gulf Station / Main Road Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-70.-7-4 _/ RE: 1) Letter from Garret Strang ~ated 8/7/03 on si resolution pending SCHD final apl~oval. 1670 House CR 48 Southold, NY 11971 / indings to d y/the Variance request. Miscellaneous lan changes a nd final sign off Omnipoint Communication Tower Penny Inc. 125855 Sound Avenue Mattituck, NY SCTM: 141-3-38.1 RE: 1) Letter form ZBA Chairwoman request for comments. Mattituck Village Pizza, Inc. 13500 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: 1) 9/14/03 Alcohol bs 8/18/03 ,APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mr. Bennett Odowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals ~ August 4, 2003 Planning Board Site Plan Review Appl. No.5357 - (Appl. Name: Omnipoint Communications) The Zoning Board of Appeals will be conducting a public headng regarding above captioned application on August 21, 2003, based on (1) an Interpretation of Section 100-162 for reversal of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, or (2) alternatively, a Variance under Section 100-162 for the location of a proposed telecommunications tower at less than 300 feet from historical properties (1000-141-3-35 and 1000-141-3-39)listed on the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southold Historic Properties. Location of Property: 12585 Sound Avenue, Mattituck; Parcel 1000- 141-3-38.1 Please furnish your comments at your earliest convenience. Thank you. /Pq Encs. CC: file '~" Correspondence L. Tortora For Office Use Only: Fee $ Office Notes: Assigned Appl. No. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS IFee: $_~.. Filed By: Office Notes: Date Assigned/Assignment No. 12585 Sound Avenue Mattituck Parcel Location: House No. Street .Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section 141 Block 03 Lot(s) 38.1 Lot S'l~6 82 acre~one DistrictLight Industri al (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: April 1, 2003 Applicant/Owns(a):. /Lessee Mailing Address: OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Site LI-13-411 4 Sylvan Nay, Parsippany, NJ 07054 Telephone: 973-397-4813 NOTE: If app~cant is not He owner, s~te if applicant is owner's aOorney, agent, archit~ b~lder, contract vendee, e~. Authorized Representative: Attorney for App1 i cant Munl ey, Meade, Ni el sen & Re ' By: Lawrence C. Re' Address: 36 North New York Avenue~ Huntin§ton, NY 11743 Telephone: 631-425-4100 Fax: 631-425-4104 Please specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to, from the above listed names: [] Applicant/Owner(s) ~] Authorized Representative [] Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 01/06/03 ~] Building Permit [] Certificate of Occupancy [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [] Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction [] Other: FOR: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article XVI Section 100-162 Subsection C.3. Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: ~ A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. [] A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. glInterpretation of the Town Code, Article XVI Section 100-162 [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has ~ has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year Page 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Part B: REASONS FOR USE VARIANCE In the Building Department Denial, the Building Department takes the position that the proposed use is not permitted because the proposed tower is to be located within 300 feet of a landmark property and, accordingly, a Use Variance is required. The New York Court of Appeals in Cellular Telephone Company v. Rosenberg, 82 N.Y.2d 364, held that a provider of wireless telecommunications services is considered a public utility for zoning purposes, and that the public utility exception to the test for unnecessary hardship, warranting the grant of a use variance applies. In its decision the Court stated, "It has long been held that a zoning board may not exclude a utility from a community ~vhere the utility has shown a need for its facilities." In addition, the Court stated, "Where the intrusion or burden on the community is minimal, the showing required by the utility should be correspondingly reduced." In this case, the applicant, which is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to provide service in Suffolk County, has a significant service gap in the Mattituck area and cannot provide reliable service to its customers as required. In order to eliminate its service gap, it must establish an antenna facility in a location and at a height determined by its engineers. The proposed facility would be located in an industrial zone and is proposed to be 100 feet in height. Accordingly, it complies with Section 100-162 and would be a permitted use, but for its proximity to the alleged landmark properties. The facility will be designed to have as little visual impact as possible on the surrounding area, and is not out of character in the Industrial Zoning District. Page 3 of 3 Part C: REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE XVI, SECTION 100-162 Article XVI, Section 100-162 states: "No Wireless communication facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold except as follows: C. In Industrial Districts including LI and LIO, a wireless communication facility is subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: 3. Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers are a permitted use, provided that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the existing grade and provided that the base of the tower is located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies." According to the Building Permit Application Notice of Disapproval dated April 1, 2003, the proposed tower is not permitted because it lies within 300 feet of two (2) lots "both of which are historical properties listed on the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities' Inventory of Southold Historic Properties." Upon information and belief the two (2) properties in question are not "landmark propert(ies)...listed by federal, state, or town agencies". The Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities is not a federal, state, or town agency. The term "landmark designation" is defined in Southold Code Section 100- 13 as, "the designation of a building or structure of architectural or historic significance to the town through listing the property in the town's Register of Designated Landmarks and filing a copy of the entry in the Town Clerk's Office." Upon information and belief, no such designation has been made and no such filing has been entered. Accordingly, it is respectfully submitted that the Building Department misapplied and misinterpreted Article XVI, Section 100-162, and that the ground for the disapproval is inapplicable. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (Applicant) Sworn to before me this , 2003 LAWRENCE C. RE' Nota~/Public, State of NeW No. 52-479cJ664 Oua~ified in Suffolk Coql~.. Commission Expires May FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Lawrence Re A/C G.S~ Penny Inc. (Omnipoint) 1 O0 Middle Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 DATE: April 1, 2003 Please take notice that your application dated lanuary 6, 2003 For permit for co._nstruction of a telecommunications tower at Location of property; 12585_5 Sound Avenue, Mattitu~ County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 141 Block3 Lot 38.1 I~ returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The nrovosed telecommunications tower, on this 3.82 acre parcel in the Light Industrial Distri~ permitted pursuant to Article XVI, Section 100-162, which states~ -- · "No wireless communication fa¢i iW shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold ex~cevt as follows: ----- C..~ Industrial Districts including LI and LIO, a wireless communication facility subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: _3.. Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers ~ermitted use, provided,that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the exisUng gra ei:~'~ prow~"fftl~Flti~ ba~e of the tm~.~- is 'located at least 100 fee~t from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town ageneie~i -- The cell tower is proposed to be located +/- 137 feet from adjacent lot ($CTM ~ 1000-141-3-~5) and +/- 158 fee, t from adjacent lot (SCTM # 1000-141-3-39), both of which are h~stoncal vropemls listed on the Soci~hdbr the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southo.ld Historic Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department, CC: file, ZB.A. ~IAIN PERMANENTLY O.82 ACRES 166,684.2 sq.ft. E~8 sq.ft. (NO .15% 231.5 sq.ft. N/A N/A TOWN OF SOUTHOLD :XIST. BUILDING/PROP. CELLUL/ SITE INDUSTRIAL DIST. 1000, SEC. 141, BLK. 05, LOT 58,1 WILLIAM F. COLLINS, A R C H I T F. C T S, LLP 10-1 TECHNOLOGy DRIVE ~'r_~, ~ ~ VOICE .' 631-68~'-~ FAX: 631"68~N~ http://www.wfcaia.com DATE: DATE: -- DATE: -,, CON51.E,TAN'~. ;LSE EXISTING OR FUTURE BY OTHERS. ,,iUNCATIONS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND ,-I FOR MAINTENANCE PURPOSES; THEREFORE ¢- NOISE, FUMES, VIBRATIONS, DUST, ODORS PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS AN BY THE PROPOSED USE, AS THIS IS ~] FOR THE PROPOSED USE. ¢,,!S, NOR SPECIAL LIGHTING FOR THE LL INCLUDE REMOTE MONITORING OF '~ED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, DESIGN BY OTHERS SHALL INCORPORATE DESIGN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH AND REGULATIONS FOR THE STATE OF BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 1030.1F STATE OF PROPOSED WORK, FOR NO. 11/13/02. 4 ISSUED FOR PRELIMNARY REVIEW ISSUED FOR APPROVALS ISSUED FOR FILING REV. FOR COORD./REISSUED FOR FILINC R~.,SSU,..D FOR FLING REISSUED FOR FILING 411 ~ · FORM NO. I TOWN OF $OUTNOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. ~]97! TEL: 765- ~802 Ea~ni ned ................. , 19 .... Approved ................. , 19 .... Permit No ................. Disapproved a/c .................................. (Building Inspector) APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT INSTRUCTIONS ~RB OF BEALTB .............. 3 SETS OF PLANS SURVEY ........................ C[tECK ......................... SEPTIC FORM ................... NOTIFY: CALL .'~3~r~2~r~lO0 ..... MAIL TO:.L~wr~oce. Co.R~f .... . .m~. h~¥,..t,~M).~,. ~k~. ~ Huntington, New York 11743 Date ................ ,19 .... a. 'ibis application utmt be ctanpletely filled in by typewriter or in ink and md~aitted ro the Building Inspector 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to ~cale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot ard of buildings on prmmlses, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed deecriptio~ of layout of properP] must be dr~m on the diagram ~ich is Imrt of this application. c. The w~rk covered by this application my not be ccramneed before issuance o~ Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this ~pplication, the lkdlding Inmpe. ctor will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such pemit shall be kept on ~ pr~mises available for inspectioa thronghont the i~ork. e. No building shall be occupied or treed in Occupancy shall have been granted by the I~.:'" Building Zooe Ordinance of th ~I~ / , described. The app!icmmt ngre ~(~N ragulatic~s, 8nd to admit · in part for a~y purpose w~atever until a Certificate of for the ism~ance of a Building Pernfit purmmnt to the racy, New York~ ar~ other applicable L~s, Ordinances'or alterations, or for rmroval or demolition, an herein e l~ws; ordinances, building code, ho~ing code, ami ~d in building'for necessary inspections. (Sig~mture of applicant, or name, if a corporation) (Maillng address of applicant) State M~ether applicant is o~ner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, ger~ral contractor, electrician, plua~er or builder t~.$~.~' .~. ,.~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ........ ~...~,...~.M,./~.: ......................................... (~ ~ ~ t~ mi1 or latest d~) If a~lic~t is a ~r~m, si~e of duly ~ri~ officer· Builders License No ............................. Pl~rs Lit. erase blo .......................... Electriciam~ License ~ ..................... ~r ~'s Li~ ~ ..................... I. ~tim of la m ~ia ~M ~ ,~11 ~ a ................................................................ I~ Sou~ ~v~ ~.~.~ ~V.~ ../!ff~ · ~ ~r Strut ~et ........w ......... ~iviai~ ...................................... Fil~ ~p ~ ............... . l~t ............... (~) 2. State ~sri~ ~ ~ ~ of ~s ~ int~ ~ ~ ~'~ of pro,l~ cmst~tion: a. ~srim ~ ~ ~ .~1~1~.. 0~..~. ~3~/~.~. '~.~tuEe'~f ~:)rk (d~,z, ck ~{dJ applicable): Ne~ ~ild[ng ~ ......... ~[tJ~ ..~ ..... Mteration .......... l~ir ............ ~al ............. l~l[~ion ............ Od)er 1~ ........... ~ ...................... ~,~ ~..5~.~. v~. (to ~ ~id ~ filing this a~ti~ti~) garage, ~l~r of ~ra .~[~ ................................ Di~nsi~s of ~isting st~res, if ~: Fr~t..7~ ......... ~ar ..~.,.$ ....... ~pth .~.~,~.(. l~iO,t ......................... ~r o~ Stories . ~pth .................... ~iO~t .................... ~r of Stories .............. ' N/~ -~ &E~/~ 7~ ,,~,~i~ o~ ~.~i~ ~ ~=~i~,= ~t ..3~. ........ ~ac 5~ ......... mp~ · ~.~: ..... ~ o~ ~,~ .... ~[4 ............~ ~ o~ ~-o~ ~ ~.~/~ ................................ ~ or ~ district in ~i~ pr~i~s am si~t~ ~.~5~[~ ......................................... ~s ~o~ mt~tim vlolate a~ ~i~ 1~, o~i~e or re,latin: .~0 ................... ~ill lot ~ ~ .... ~0. ........... Will ~ss [ill ~ of ~tr~tor ................................... ~ress ............................... ~ ~ .............. diis p~r~fl~in ~ f~t o~ a ti~i mtl~1 ~ ~ .......... ~ ,.~ .... PLOT DI^GKAH' t~cate clearly and distlnctly ail buildings, x*hether~existlng or proFosed, mxl indicate all act-back dimensions property lines. Ci~ street and block i~mber or descrlpti~ aCcording to deed, mxt show' street m~es a~l indicate hetber interior or corner lot. ~ of i~ivld~l si~it~g c~tract) . LAWRENCE C RE' Note~ Public, State of New York (S~gnamre ol~ Apphcant) ATTACHMENT "A" (continued from page 2) Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Building No. 2: Front 35' Rear 35' Depth 26.2' Height Number of Stories: 2 story frame building with 1 story enclosed porch. Building No. 3: Front 12.3' Rear Number of Stories: 1 story shed. Building No. 4: Front 102.3' Rear 12.3' Depth 8.2' Height, 102.4' Depth 99.3' Height Number of Stories: 1 story aluminum storage building. Building No. 5: Front 48.4' Rear 48.5' Depth irregular: 24.2' / 31.6' Height Number of Stories: I story frame storage building. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: April 1, 2003 TO: Lawrence Re A/C G.S. Penny Inc. (Omnipoint) 100 Middle Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 Please take notice that your application dated January 6, 2003 For permit for construction of a telecommunications tower at Location of property: 125855 Sound Avenue, Mattituck, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 141 Block 3 Lot 38.1 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: Thc proposed telecommunications tower, on this 3.82 acre parcel in the Light Industrial District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XVI, Section 100-162, which states, "No wireless communication facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold except as follows: C. In Industrial Districts including LI and LIO, a wireless communication facility is subiect to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: 3. Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers are a permitted use, provided that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the existing grade and provided that the base of the tower is located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. The cell tower is proposed to be located +/- 137 feet from adjacent lot (SCTM # 1000-141-3-35) and +/- 158 feet from adiacent lot (SCTM # 1000-141-3-39), both of which are historical properties listed on the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities Inventory of Southold Historic Properties. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. MEADE, NIELSEN & 1~1~ (631) 425-4100 March 27, 2003 Mr. Damon Peter Rallis Town of Southold Building Department Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Building Permit Application SCTM#: 1000-141-03-20 Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Rallis: In furtherance of our telephone conversations, we enclose three (3) sets of signed and sealed, revised Site Plans, SP-1 and SP-2, that now depict the distance between the proposed anteima facility and Tax Lots 141-4-35 and 141-4-39. As you know, it is our position that the two aforementioned tax lots are not landmark properties listed by federal, state, or town agencies, as contemplated in Section 100-162B(3). Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RI~ Lawrence C. R6 LCR:db Enclosures BUILDING PF~2MIT EXAMINER CHECK LI°a~ APPLICANT: DATE REVIEWED: / /02 DATE SUBMITTED: / /02 SCTM# DISTRICT: 1,000, SECTION: //~/~, BLOCK: _.~,LOT: ST~ET ~D~SS: /~ ~~~- CITY'. ~ PROJECT DESC~TION: ~ ~ SUBDIVISION: ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: FAST TRACK? SINGLE & SEPARATE CERTIFICATION-REQUIRED? NOTES: LOTS 40,000SF -100-24. Lot recognition.(CREATED before June 30, 1983), UNDERSIZED LOTS FROM JAN.1997 100-25. Merger.(A nonconforming at any time after 7/111 ZONING DISTRICT: REQ. LOT SIZE: REQ. FRONT REQ. REAR CONFORMING? ACT. LOT SIZE: ~'-q' REQ. LOT COV. PROP. FRONT REQ SIDE PROP. REAR REQ. HEIGHT ' V ACT. LOT CO . ACT. SIDE PROP. HEIGHT WATER FRONT? PANEL #: FLOOD ZONE: DESCRIPTION: APPROVALS REQUIRED SUFFOLK COUNTY HEALTH DEPT: YES or NO, (BED #): TOWN SEPTIC RECEIPT: Y or N NEW YORK STATE DEC: PRE-DEC 9a/?S YES or NO SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES: YES or NO TOWN ZONING BOARD APPROVAL: YES or NO TOWN PLAN. BOARD APPROVAL: YES or NO TOWN HISTORICAL PRE (SPLIA): YES or NO DTE: / / PERMIT #:RI O- NYS ENERGY: YES OR NO : EGRESS (18 H min.? 4 sq total) VENT (SQ. FT. x 4%)_ LIGHT (SQ. FT. x 8%) BUILDING PERMITS OPEN/EXPIRED: BP -Z / C/0 Z- ,. HAVE PRE CO'S: ~ OR N. Bp. _-Z / C/0 Z-_ .,_ NOTE~: ~ ,(__~-';'~ - ~ ->,.~.~-..'- ~'~-~'z~-~. FEE STRUCTURE: FOUNDATION: FIRST FLOOR: SECOND FLOOR: OTHER: TOTAL: SF SF SF SF SF fi,liT OTHER TOTAL FEE FEE FEE 1. ( SF)- ( _SF)= SF X $ =$ +$ +$ = $ 2. ( SF)- ( SF)= SF X $ =$ +$ +$ = $. MUI~,EY~ 1VIEADE~ NIELSEN & l~l~ January 6, 2003 BY HAND Town of Southold Building Department 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Building Permit Application SCTM # 1000: Section: 141, Block: Premises: 125855 Sound Avenue Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Sir/Madam: We are attorneys for Omnipoint Communications, Inc. in connection with the captioned application. Enclosed is our application to erect a 100' monopole with twelve (12) public utility wireless antennas affixed thereto, and to install three (3) equipment cabinets. Accordingly, we enclose herewith: 2. 3. 3. Building Permit Application; Three (3) sets of construction drawings; Three (3) sets of site plans; and Building Permit Application denial fee of $35.00 made payable to the Town of Southold. Should you have any questions with respect to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RI~ By: Lawrence C. R6 LCR:jm Enclosures ARTICLE XVl, Wireless Communication Facilities [Added 11-12-1997 by L.L. No. 26-1997] § 100-160. Purpose. It is the express purpose of this article to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of wireless communication facilities while protecting the health, safety and welfare of Southold% citizens and allowing wireless service providers to meet their technological and service objectives. This article allows wireless communication facilities, and particularly telecommunication towers, to he reviewed and approved in keeping with the town's existing zoning and historic development patterns, including the size and spacing of structures and open spaces. Furthermore, the standards herein reflect two preferences: that wireless communication facilities are preferred in industrial areas and that wireless communication facilities be located on existing buildings and towers rather than on newly constructed towers. Any wireless communication facility must take into account the aesthetic aspects of the town, including open vistas, scenic byways and historic districts. § 100-161. Scope. [Amended 12-8-1998 by L.L. No. 25-1998] The regulations of this article shall govern and control the erection, enlargement, expansion, alteration, operation, maintenance, relocation and removal of all wireless communication facilities. The regulations of this article relate to the location and design of these facilities and shall be in addition to the provisions of the Southold Building and Zoning Codes and any other federal, state or local laws or Federal Communication Commission (FCC) regulations pertaining to such facilities. Nothing herein shall be construed to, apply to, prohibit, regulate or otherwise affect the erection, maintenance or utilization of antennas or support structures by those licensed by the Federal Communications Commission pursuant to Chapter 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97, to operate amateur radio stations. § 100-162. Location of use. No wireless communication facility shall be used, erected or altered in the Town of Southold except as follows: A. In Residential and Marine Districts including AC, R80, R40, R120, R200, R400, AHD, HD, P.R, RO, MI and ME, a wireless communication facility is subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements. (1) Wireless communication facilities on buildings shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this article. Wireless communication facilities on buildings shall be no higher than 10 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the proposed facility. The building on which the wireless communication facility is located must be located at least 100 feet from the nearest property line and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (2) Wireless communication facilities on existing telecommunications towers shall require a special exception approval pursuant to this chapter unless otherwise allowed by the terms of a prior special exception approval. (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers shall require special exception approval pursuant to this article and shall not project higher than 10 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the facility or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, these facilities shall not project higher than 10 feet above the average tree canopy height in that radius measured fxom ground level. If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility site, all telecommunication towers shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions. The base of the tower shall be located at least 100 feet from the nearest property line and 300 feet from a landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (4) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by state, federal or town government, provided that a license or lease authorizing such facility has been approved by that government. The height of such facility may be established by the public agency. (5) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by a special district, provided that a license or lease authorizing such facility has been approved by the commissioners of the special district, and provided that it does not exceed the maximum heights specified above. B. In Commercial Districts including LB, HB and B a wireless communication facility is subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: (1) Wireless communication facilities on buildings are a permitted use. Wireless communication facilities on buildings shall be no higher than 20 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the proposed facility. Wireless communication facilities on buildings must be located at least 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (2) Wireless communication facilities on existing telecommunication towers are a permitted 2 use unless otherwise restricted pursuant to the terms of a prior special exception approval. (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunications towers are a permitted use, but shall not project higher than 20 feet above the average height of buildings (excluding signs, fences and walls) within 300 feet of the facility, or, if there are no buildings within 300 feet, these facilities shall not project higher than 20 feet above the average tree canopy height in that radius measured from ground level. If there are no buildings within 300 feet of the proposed facility site, all telecommunication towers shall be surrounded by dense tree growth to screen views of the facility in all directions. These trees may be existing on the subject property or planted on site. The base of the tower shall be located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (4) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by state, federal or town government, provided that a license or lease authorizing such facility has been approved by that government. C. In Industrial Districts including LI and LIO, a wireless communication facility is subject to site plan approval and must meet the following requirements: (1) Wireless communication facilities on buildings are a permitted use, provided that the height of the wireless communication facility does not extend more than 100 feet above the existing grade and the wireless communication facility is located at least 100 feet from the nearest property line and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (2) Wireless communication facilities on existing telecommunication towers are permitted unless otherwise restricted pursuant to the terms of a prior special exception approval. (3) Wireless communication facilities on telecommunication towers are a permitted use, provided that the height of the tower above grade does not exceed 100 feet above the existing grade and provided that the base of the tower is located at least 100 feet from the nearest dwelling unit and 300 feet from any landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies. (4) A wireless communication facility is a permitted use, not requiring site plan approval, if located on property owned, leased or otherwise controlled by state, federal or town government, provided that a license or lease authorizing such facility has been approved by that government. § 100-163. Special exception approval. A. Authority. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall be empowered to issue a special exception approval for wireless communication facilities, subject to the provisions of this chapter. B. Standards. In addition to the standards in Article XXVI of this Code, no special exception approval shall be granted unless the Zoning Board of Appeals specifically finds and determines the following: (1) (2) (3) The applicant is a public utility. Construction of the proposed facility or modification of the existing facility is a public necessity, in that it is required to meet current or expected demands of the telecommunications provider and to render adequate service to the public. The applicant has made substantial effort to locate or collocate on existing towers or, failing that, that the applicant has made substantial effort to locate on federal, state or town land and facilities. (4) The facility conforms with applicable FCC regulations. (5) There are compelling reasons, economic or otherwise, which make it more feasible to construct the proposed facilities than alternatives. C. Matters to be considered. In addition to the matters to be considered in Article XXVI of this Code, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall give consideration to the following in issuing a special approval for wireless communication facilities: (1) The height of the proposed tower shall be the minimum necessary to render adequate service. (2) The wireless communication facility has been situated to minimize its proximity and visibility to residential structures, residential district boundaries and landmarks designated by town, federal or state agencies. (3) The wireless communication facility is designed and situated to be compatible with the nature of uses on adjacent and nearby property. (4) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding topography to minimize its visual impacts. (5) The wireless communication facility has been designed to use the surrounding tree, building or foliage coverage to minimize its visual impacts. (6) The wireless communication facility maximizes design characteristics to reduce or eliminate visual impacts or obtrusiveness. (7) Other adequate conditions have been placed on the wireless communication facility 4 which will minimize any adverse impacts of the facility on adjoining properties. D. Application requirements. In order to make the above-described determination, the Zoning Board shall require the following in addition to the requirements of Article XXVI: (1) Each application shall include a survey clearly indicating: (a) The location, type and height of the wireless communication facility. (b) Whether it is located on an existing structure, collocated or on a telecommunication tower. (c) On-site land uses and zoning. (d) Adjacent land uses, structures and zoning within 300 feet. (e) Distances between all structures. (f) Location of landmark listed by federal, state or town agencies within 300 feet. (g) Adjacent roadways and/or private rights-of-way. (h) Proposed means of access. (i) Setbacks from property lines. (j) Elevation drawings of the structures. (k) A long environmental assessment form with visual addendum. (1) Other information deemed by the Zoning Board to be necessary to assess compliance with this law. (2) Each application shall include a written site location alternative analysis describing the location of other sites considered, the availability of those sites, the extent to which other sites do or do not meet the provider's service or engineering needs and the reason why the subject site was chosen. (3) The applicant shall document to the satisfaction of the Zoning Board of Appeals that a good-faith effort has been made to locate or collocate on existing towers or other available and appropriate buildings and structures, that it is not feasible to collocate on an existing facility and that the proposed location is necessary to provide adequate service to the public. The documentation shall include a notarized statement by the applicant as to whether construction of the wireless communication facility will accommodate collocation of additional antennas for future users. (4) Each application shall include a plan which shall reference all existing wireless communication facility locations in the Town of Southold, any such facilities in the abutting towns which provide service to areas within the Town of Southold, any changes proposed within the following twelve-month period, including the applicant's plans for new locations and the discontinuance or relocation of existing wireless facilities. Alternatively, at the beginning of the year the applicant may submit an annual wireless communication facility plan containing the aforementioned information for the calendar year. (5) A landscape plan showing specific landscape materials, fencing and maintenance arrangements. (6) The Zoning Board of Appeals may retain technical consultants as it deems necessary to provide assistance in the review of the needs and site location alternatives analyses and other matters that the Board deems necessary. The applicant shall bear the reasonable cost associated with such consultation, which cost shall be assessed as an additional application fee. In no case shall the fee be more than 5% of the total project cost as determined for building permit fee assessment purposes. (7) A copy of the deed or lease agreement establishing applicant's fight to use the parcel on which the wireless communication facility is to be located. (8) An engineering analysis of the radio emissions and a propagation map for the proposed wireless communication facility. The analysis shall be prepared and signed by a New York State licensed professional engineer specializing in electrical engineering with expertise in radio communication facilities. The results from the analysis must clearly show that the power density levels of the electromagnetic energy generated from the proposed facility are within the allowable limits established by the FCC which are in effect at the time of the application. If the wireless communication facility would be collocated with an existing facility, the cumulative effects of them must also be analyzed. The power density analysis shall be based on the assumption that all antennas mounted on the proposed facility are simultaneously transmitting radio energy at a power level equal to the maximum antenna power rating specified by the manufacturer. (9) A search ring prepared, signed and sealed by a qualified radio frequency engineer registered in New York and overlaid on an appropriate background map demonstrating the area within which the wireless communication facility needs to be located in order to provide proper signal strength and coverage to the target cell. The applicant must be prepared to explain to the Zoning Board why it selected the proposed site, discuss the availability or lack thereof of a suitable structure within the search ring for collocation, and the extent to which the applicant has explored locating the proposed tower in a more intensive use district. Correspondence with other telecommunication providers concerning collocation is part of this requirement. E. Conditions. The Zoning Board shall consider the following in establishing conditions on the 6 issuance of the special exception approval: (1) In reviewing special exception approval applications reqnired by this section the Zoning Board of Appeals shall consider the town's policy as stated in this article. When considering appropriate height in conjunction with such applications, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be more permissive when a facility is proposed for collocation by more than one service provider and less permissive when the facility is proposed for use by a single provider. (2) In approving a special exception the Zoning Board may waive or reduce the criteria in this article, to the extent specified below, if the Zoning Board concludes that the goals and stated purposes of this law are better served, and that doing so will have no detrimental effect on adjacent properties or on the public health, safety and welfare, and thereby: (a) Increase the height of the proposed tower up to 15 feet over the height allowed by this Code, with a maximum total height of no more than 60 feet. (b) Minimize proximity of the tower to residential structures or historic landmarks listed by federal, state or town agencies. (c) Modify the planting of surrounding tree coverage and foliage to account for existing vegetation and land contours. (d) Modify the design of the tower, with particular reference to design characteristics that reduce or eliminate visual obtrusiveness. (3) At the request of the Building Inspectors, which shall be no more frequently than annually, the provider shall have each wireless communication facility inspected at its own expense, and a copy of the inspection report shall be promptly transmitted to the Building Inspector. Radio emission inspections shall be performed by a New York State licensed professional engineer specializing in electrical engineering with expertise in radio communication facilities. The radio emission inspection shall describe the power density levels of the electromagnetic energy generated from the facility, including the cumulative effects of collocated antennas. In the event that the radio emission inspection indicates that the electromagnetic energy generated from the facility is above the allowable limits stated within the applicable FCC or ANSI standards or other applicable state or federal guidelines in effect, the applicant shall cease all use of the facility until such time as it proves to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector that the power density levels of the electromagnetic energy to be generated are below the applicable standards. (4) Any special exception approval granted under this article shall have a term of five years, commencing from the grant of the special exception, which may be extended for an additional five-year term upon application to the Zoning Board. On a renewal application, the applicant shall demonstrate that the wireless communication facility is in 7 compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and with all of the conditions of the special exception approval and site plan, that the facility is necessary to provide adequate service, and that there is no reasonable alternative available to the owner which will provide adequate service without the continuing use of the facility. Subsequent special exception renewals shall be subject to review by the Zoning Board and subject to such standards that shall be included in the Town Code at that point in time. § 100-164. Historic buildings and districts. No wireless communication facility is allowed on any designated landmark property or district listed by federal, state or town agencies, except as specified below: A. Any wireless communication facility located on or within an historic structure listed by federal, state or town agencies shall not alter the character-defining features, distinctive construction methods or original materials of the building. B. Any alteration made to an historic structure to accommodate a wireless communication facility shall be fully reversible. C. Wireless communication facilities within an historic district listed by federal, state or town agencies shall be concealed within or behind existing architectural features, so that they are not visible. § 100-165. Design standards. The following design standards shall apply to wireless communication facilities installed or constructed pursuant to the terms of this chapter: A. Camouflage on buildings. When a wireless communication facility extends above the roof height of a building on which it is mounted, every effort shall be made to conceal the facility within or behind existing architectural features to limit its visibility fi.om public ways and residential uses but still permit the facility to perform its designated function. Facilities mounted on a roof shall be stepped back from the front facade in order to limit their impact on the building's silhouette. The wireless communication facilities shall blend in with the existing building's architecture and, if over five square feet, shall be palmed or shielded with material which is consistent with the design features and materials of the building. B. The minimum lot size for the siting of a telecommunication tower shall be in accordance with the following. No tower can be built on a lot which is nonconforming in size to the requirements set forth below: Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot Area in in Residential and Minimum Lot Area in Commercial Districts Marine Districts Industrial Districts Per Bulk ScheduleEN(1 ) 5 acres Per Bulk ScheduleEN(2) per zone per zone C. Setbacks. Towers and equipment facilities shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure(s) are located. D. Fencing. The base area of a telecommunication tower and equipment facility shall be enclosed with a black vinyl chain-link fence not less than six feet in height. E. Signs. Signs shall not be permitted on towers except for signs displaying contact information and safety instructions. Such signs shall not exceed five square feet in surface area. F. Equipment facility. Equipment accessory to the wireless communication facility may be located within an existing building. In newly constructed buildings and structures an equipment facility is limited to 500 square feet in floor area. If the newly constructed equipment facility is designed for collocation, the facility may be up to 1,000 square feet. The equipment facility shall be constructed with a finish similar to that of adjacent structures on the property and integrated into the architectural style. Any newly constructed equipment facility shall be located in accordance with the minimum height and yard requirements of the zoning district applicable to the site, and no more than two adjacent off-street parking spaces shall be provided for service vehicles. Any regrading for stormwater retention that is required by the Town Engineer shall be accommodated on site. G. Site lighting. As independent freestanding facilities on separate sites will not be accessible to the public, the lighting permitted shall be the minimum required to protect the public welfare. Facilities sited on existing developed sites shall be incorporated into the lighting and landscaping plans of those sites. H. Access. Access to tower or monopole areas shall be from established site access points whenever possible. Dish antennas. Dish antennas shall be colored, camouflaged or screened to the extent that they are as unobtrusive as possible, and in no case shall the diameter of a dish antenna exceed six feet. Electric line setback. No wireless communication facility shall be located nearer to any overhead electric transmission line carrying more than 220 volts than a distance equal to the facility's height above the roof or other permanent structure to which it is attached. K. Collocation. Wireless communication facilities shall be designed to provide for collocation by multiple providers or designed so that they can be retrofitted to accommodate multiple providers. § 100-166. Appearance. -~l~. Scenic landscapes and vistas. All telecommunication towers which are not camouflaged by existing buildings or structures shall be surrounded by a buffer of dense tree growth. A wireless communication facility that is located within 300 feet of a scenic vista, scenic landscape or scenic road a~ de~;'-'o~oa *"' *ho * .....hall not exceed the height of vegetation at the proposed location. Ifihe facility is ]ocate~l 'farther than 300 feet from the scenic vista, scenic landscape or scenic road, the height regulations described elsewhere in this article shall apply. B. Base landscaping. A screen of evergreen trees shall be planted outside the fence of the telecommunication tower base area to provide a visual screen or buffer for adjoining private properties and the public right-of-way. Required front yard setback areas shall be landscaped. C. Color. Towers shall either be blue/gray in color, have a galvanized finish, or be colored appropriate to the tower's locational context to the extent that the tower is as unobtrusive as possible, unless otherwise required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). If a wireless communication facility is installed on a structure other than a tower, the antenna and supporting electrical and mechanical equipment must be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the colors of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and related equipment as visually unobtrusive as possible. Camouflage by vegetation for residential screening. Where the site proposed for a freestanding tower structure is located within a residential zone or has one or more property lines abutting or on the opposite side of a street from a residential zone or use permitted in a residential zone, large trees and/or existing and proposed buildings on the site shall be used to provide an angle of occlusion from the property line to the top of the structure of 50° or less (50° from the horizon line is the upper limit of the normal vertical cone of vision). To achieve the occlusion, a row of mixed deciduous and evergreen trees shall be preserved and/or planted at 50% of the distance between the tower and the property line, and a second row at 90% of the distance between the tower and property line (see illustrations below). Transplanted trees shall have a minimum caliper of three inches, be spaced on thirty-foot centers and have a typical height at maturity of at least 50 feet. A three-year bond or other assurances shall be required to ensure that the plantings survive and are maintained. 10 E. Alternate screening. The location of a cellular wireless communication facility on an existing water tower, silo or equivalent vertical structure, including an existing cellular, radio or television tower, is permitted without the need to meet the conditions in Subsections A, B, C and D above, provided that the height of the existing structure is not increased as a result of the attachment of the cellular structure. A decorative disguising structure such as a clock tower may also be approved as an alternative to the conditions in Subsections A, B, C and D at the discretion of the Zoning Board. If the height of the existing structure is to be increased by the attachment of the new structure, all of the conditions herein shall apply as to a new freestanding structure. Commercial and industrial siting. Towers to be sited on developed commercial or industrial properties shall be located to the rear of other principal buildings and shall not encroach on planting buffers, parking areas or otherwise impair the operation of previously approved systems such as stormwater drainage basins. Existing buildings and structures should be used in the siting of freestanding towers to contribute to the visual screening of the tower. G. Commercial districts. Towers to be sited on undeveloped properties in the commercial districts shall apply the standards of the condition in § 100-165C herein to all property lines, including the streetline, except that a driveway shall be permitted to gain access to the facility for maintenance personnel and equipment. H. Airport regulations. All towers shall comply with applicable airport hazard regulations and shall be subject to approval from the Federal Aviation Administration for location, height and lighting to prevent interference with the operation of an airport or otherwise threaten the public safety. § 100-167. Removal. 11 A. Any wireless communication facility that is not operated for a continuous period of 12 months shall be deemed abandoned. At that time the owner of the wireless communication facility shall remove same within 90 days of such deemed abandonment. In the case of a wireless communication facility on preexisting structures, this provision shall apply to the wireless communication facility only. If the wireless communication facility is not removed within the said 90 days, the Building Inspectors may, with the approval of the Town Board, give the owner notice that unless the removal is accomplished in 30 days, the town will cause the removal at the owner's expense. The grant of a special exception approval under this article shall include irrevocable permission to the town to accomplish removal of the wireless communication facility under this article. Any cost to the town for such removal shall constitute a lien on the tax lot on which the tower is situated and shall be collected in the same manner as a town tax upon real property. § 100-168. Nonconforming uses. Preexisting telecommunication towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently exist. New construction, other than maintenance on a preexisting tower, shall comply with the requirements of this article. § 100-169. Severability. The various parts, sections and clauses of this article are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the article shall not be affected thereby. 12 Endnotes 1 (Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter. 2 (Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter. 13 ARTICLE XlV, EN(1) Light Industrial (LI) District [Added 1-10-1989 by L.L. No. 1-1989] § 100-140. Purpose. The purpose of the Light Industrial (L1) District is to provide an opportunity for business and industrial uses on smaller lots than would be appropriate for the LIO Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District. § 100-141. Use regulations. In the LI District, no building or premises shall be used and no building or part of a building shall be erected or altered which is arranged, intended or designed to be used, in whole or in part, for any purpose except the following: A. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989; 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 26-1994; 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses and, except for those uses permitted under Subsection A(1) and Subsection A(2) hereof, are subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) The agricultural operations and accessory uses, including irrigation, the raising of field and garden crops, vineyard and orchard farming, the maintenance of nurseries and the seasonal sale of products grown on the premises, the keeping, breeding, raising and training of horses, domestic animals and fowl, barns, storage buildings, greenhouses and other related structures to the same extent and subject to the same conditions allowed in the AC Zone. (2) Buildings, structures and uses owned or operated by the Town of Southold, school districts, park districts and fire districts. (3) Wholesale businesses, private warehousing and public warehousing, and building material storage and sale, but excluding storage of coal, coke, fuel oil or junk. [Amended 11-19-2002 by L.L. No. 7-2002] (4) Building, electrical and plumbing contractor's businesses or yards. (5) Cold storage plants, baking and other food processing and packaging plants that are not offensive, obnoxious or detrimental to neighboring uses by reason of dust, smoke, vibration, noise, odor or effluent. (6) Office buildings for businesses, govemmental and professional uses, including administrative training, data processing, publication, financial and sales offices. (7) Telephone exchanges. (8) Wineries as regulated by § 100-101 A(11). (9) Auto repair shop. (10) Repair shop (not including auto and marine). (11) Custom workshop. (12) Machine and equipment workshop. (13) Light industrial uses. (14) Publishing and printing plants. (15) Boat building, servicing and storage, excluding wholesale and retail sales of boats and accessories. [Amended 4-28-1997 by L.L. No. 6-1997] Uses permitted by special exception of the Board of Appeals. The following uses are permitted as a special exception by the Board of Appeals as hereinafter provided and subject to site plan approval by the Planning Board: (1) Research, design or development laboratories, provided that any manufacturing shall be limited to prototypes and products for testing. (2) Laundry or dry-cleaning plants, subject to the following conditions: (a) All processes and storage shall be carried on within an enclosed building. (b) All fluids used in processing shall be recycled, and the overall facility shall be designed, located and operated to protect surface waters and the groundwater fi.om pollution. (3) Light industrial uses, subject to the following conditions: (a) No such process or operation shall involve the handling, storage or discharge of explosives or permit upon the premises any virus or other type of infectious organisms identified with diseases of animals or humans. (b) No offensive noises, gases, fumes, smoke, odors, dust, effluent or vibrations shall emanate from such use and no waste products shall be discharged therefrom of a character to create a nuisance or to be injurious to health or to negatively impact groundwater. 2 (c) Such processes shall involve the use of only oil, gas or electricity for fuel. (4) Conference facilities, subject to the following conditions: (a) Where rooms are provided for conference attendees, said rooms are permitted as set forth and regulated by § 100-61B(4) of the Resort Residential (RR) District. (5) Public utility structures and uses. (6) Truck or bus terminals (garages, parking facilities, loading docks, etc.) (7) Food processing and packaging plants, not including fish processing plants. (8) Repair of boats and marine items. [Amended 5-9-1989 by L.L. No. 6-1989] Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted as accessory uses and, except for residential accessory uses and signs, which are governed by Article XX, are subject to site plan review: (1) Accessory uses on the same lot with and customarily incidental to any permitted or special exception use and not involving a separate business. (2)EN(2)Accessory uses as set forth in and as regulated by § 100-131C(5) through (8) of the Light Industrial Park/Planned Office Park District. § 100-142. Bulk, area and parking regulations. No building or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LI Light Industrial District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in fulI.EN(3) § 100-143. Front yard setbacks. [Added 8-22-1995 by L.L. No. 18-19951 A. Structures shall be set back at least one hundred (100) feet from the right-of-way. B. There shall be an exception to Subsection A if the adjacent parcels are developed, in which case the minimum front yard setback shall be the average of the setbacks of the adjacent parcels. A project shall be divided into separate structures so that no single structure shall have more than sixty (60) linear feet of frontage on one (1) street. The setbacks of multiple structures on a parcel may vary, provided that the average setback of the structures meets the setback required above and all buildings are at least seventy-five (75) feet from the right-of-way. 4 Endnotes 1 (Popup) Editor's Note: Former Art. X1V, Administration and Enforcement, was renumbered as Art. xxvm 1-10-1989 by L.L. No. 1-1989. 2 (Popup) Editor's Note: Former Subsection C(2) and (3), which regulated signs, were repealed 11-29-1994 by L.L. No. 25-1994, which local law also renumbered former Subsection C(4) as C(2). For current sign provisions, see Art. XX, Signs. 3 (Popup) Editor's Note: The Bulk Schedule is included at the end of this chapter, and the Parking and Loading Schedules are in §§ 100-191 and 100-192. 4 (Popup) Editor's Note: Former Art. XV, Amendments, was renumbered as Art. XXIX 1-10-1989 by L.L. No. 1-1989. OLASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000- 141.-3-38.1 Project Name: Omnipoint Comm. Inc.(Geor,qe Penny) Address: 12585 Sound Avenue Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Omnipoint Communications, Inc. Owner Name: George Penny Zone 1: LI Approval Date: 6/14/2004 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 6/15/2004 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: located on the s/s/o County Road 48 approximately 50' w/o Westphalia Avenue SC Filin,q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED IJUN 1 4 2006 Records Management SCAN Date: - DRAFT MAPS - Omnipoint COMMUNICATIONS INC. as an agen[ for Omnipoint Facilities Network 2, L.L.C. 11 HIGHPOIN-T DRIVE, WAYNE NJ 07470 CELI.ULAR COMMUNICATION EQUIP1VIF. NT SITE. NO. LI-13-411-B (MATTITUCIO 125855 SOUND AVE., MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 LOCATION MAP DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONS FROM NEAREST HIGHWAY: GW 8RIDGE TO CROSS BRONX EXPRESSWAY TO THROGS NECK BRIDGE TO CROSS ISEAND PKWY SOUTH TO LIE (RT 495) EASTS TO END. 8ECOM£S RTE 58 WHICH TURNS INTO RTE. 25. GO EAST INTO MATTITUCK AND MAKE A lEFT ON PACIFIC AVE TO END. MAKE A LEFT OVER TRACKS AND PENNY LUMBER IS ON THE LEFT. NOTE; COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IS N~ PERMITTED ON PARKWAYS VE~[F~ AL[ ROUTES SITE INFORMATION BLOCK: 03 SECTION: 141 LATITUDE: N 40' 59' 22' LOT: 20 ZONING: 1000 LONGITUDE: W 72' 32' 19" BI.~DE%~KNOTI~: LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT: MONOPOLE EOB~PMENT SQUARE FOOTAGE: 120 SO.FT.± EQUIPMENT: (3) NORTEL S8000 EQUIPMENT CABINETS ANTENNA: (12) EMS RR6B-19-02DP PROPERTY CONTACT: UTILITY CONTACT: APPLICANT: (516) 885-0879 DEAN LOCKE (631) 548-7042 LIPA OMNiPOINT FACILITIES NETWORK 2, LLC OMNIPOINT FACILITIES NETWORK 2. LLC. 11 HIGH POINT DRIVE. WAYNE NJ 07470 PROJECT MANAGER: KEVlN GRISWOLD 973-6B6-6509 RV ENGINEER: NAMIT SHARMA 973-978-5843 TITLE SHEET A 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN & GENERAL NOTES A-2 SOUTH ELEVATION AND SITE OETA)LS A 3 ENLARGED PART~AL SITE PLAN & DETAILS A-4 TYP. EQUIP CABINET & ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAILS TENNA SCHED. E~.O.M & ROUTING SCHEMATIC 09/13/02 09/13/O2 09/13/02 09/13/02 09/13/02 12/11/02 12/11/02 12/11/02 12/11/02 12/11/02 2/ /02 E-1 GENERAL ELECTRIC NOTES AND SYMBOLS 09/13/02 0 E-2 ELEC SER~CE PLAN, R~SER DIACRAId AND BTS RISER OIAGRANS 09/1.3/02 E-3 EOUIPMENT GROUNDING PLAN AND DETAILS 09/13/02 E-A GROUNDING SHEMATIC AND DETAILS 09/13/02 E-B ANTENNA AND CABLE GROUNDING & WATERPROOFING 09/13/02 SC- 1 SPECIFICATION SC-2 SPECIFICATION SC-3 SPECIFICATION SC-6 SPECIFICATION SC-4 SPECIFICATION SC-5 SPECIFICATION APPROVALS SIGNATURE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT # 02-4756 ~Omnipoint ~ COMMUNICA~ONS INC. SITE INFORMATION MATTITUCK 12855 SOUND AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY. 11952 L1-15-411 B DESIGN TYPE RAW LAND BUILD NEW MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER T-1 GENERAL NOTES: I ALL WOBK SHALL BE DONE IN STBICT ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF LOCAL STATE. AND FEDERAL, LAWS, ORDINANCES, AND REGULATIONS WHENEVER APRUCABLE 2 EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD TO HAVE VISITED THE SITE AND TO HAVE VER~FIED ALL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF BID, } ~N ALL CASES, DRAWINGS SHALL NOT BE SCALED FOR INFORMATION F~CURED DIMENSIONS AND '~J/~',~ CONDiTiONS MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ NEW MOBILE COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COM~OUN~ SHALL COOPERATE WITH OTHER T"AD[S TO ~ACILITA*E dOB SCHED"UNO AND COMPLETION 9. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO ADdO~NINC REMAINING AREAS AS A /~ ~ / ~ (5) NEW OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT RESULT OF HIS WORK, AND SHALL REPAIR DAMAGED SURFACES TO THEIR PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS OR ~ / ~ ~ ~ CABINETS SET ON NEW ~0' X 20' AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE WORK ;;;~~ ? SHALL ENDEAVOR TO RESCHEDULE WORK TO AREAS UNAFFECTED BY SUSPECTED CONTAMINAT'ON IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE DE~Y TO THE PROJECT SCHEDULE '  ' 16 ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE IN FULL CONFORMANCE WITH N Y5 UNIFORM FIRE PR~ENTION AND BU~LDINC CODE, AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND RECU~T~ONS.r ~, ~ 17. ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INST~LED BY AN ELECTRICIAN LICENSED IN SUFFOLK COUN~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEW YORK STAT~ AND NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES A NEW YORK BOARD OF FIRE UNDERWRITER'S CERTIFICATE SHALL ~E OBTAINED FOR ALL ELECTRICAL WORK. AND SUPPLIED TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT  18. PRovIDE ANY AND ALL TREATED WOOD BLOCKING/BACKING OR 14 GA. GALV. F~T STOCK BACKING AS ~ REOUIRED TO ENSURE PROPER AND ADEOUATE sUPPORT (IN COMPLIANCE WITH NEW YORK STATE PROJECT ~ 02-4756 GENERAL S~E NO~S: ~A ~. 'DEWATER' ALL TRENCHES AS REOUIRED DURINO ~NSTALLATION OF ALL FOOTINC ANO FOUNDATION TO 4. COMPACTION UNDER STRUCTURES, BUILDING S~BS, STEP$, PAVEMENTS AND WALK WAYS SHALL BE 95% ]28~ SOUND AVENUE ~ ~ ~ ] MAXIMUM DRY DENSI~, ASTM D 1557. COMPACTION UNDER ~WNS OR IN UNPAVED AREAS, 85% MAXIMUM MATTITUCK., NY. 11952 ~ 5. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE SER~CES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND 6. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO TONE PATH OF EXISTINC CABLE AND PROVIDE MARK-OU[S. HAND EXCAVATE DESIGN TYPE ~ NEAR ANY UNDERGROUND PIPES, UTILITIES, OR STRUCTURES. MEANS OF PROTECTION OF SAID EXISTING UTIUTIES AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE NEW WORK NEW MONOPOLE COORDINATE ALL REQUIRED RELOCATION WORK W~TH THE AFFECTED UTIL~ PROVIDER 8 ALL WASTE MATERIAL INCLUDING RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS. ETC, SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE SHEET TITLE NOTg:I~ MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION. SHALL BE rN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GENERAL NOTES I SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED, MINIMUM 4,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. SHEET NUMBER REV. ,o IF EXISTING GRAVEL BEDD*NG IS REMOVE0, STOCKPILE. AND RESPREAD AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE SCALE: NORTH RESTORE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC AS WELL RROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AS REOU,~E0 ~I1 1 RESTORE EX~STING GRAVEL LAYER EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION __ __ __ ~ ~ILI~ ~ENCHING DETAIL 6" CABINETS MOUNTED ATOP EXISTING BUILDING (BEYOND) STRETCHER BAR 8" POURED CONCRETE ~ I EQUIPMENT PROJECT ~ 02-4756 SE' ON PVO SLEEPERS mnoint , ~l ~ ~ ~ 1 1/2" MAX '~ ~ ~: TYPICAL WOVEN WIRE FENCING NOTES MATTITUCK ~ ~' ~ ~ (INSTALL FENCING PER ASTM F 567, SWING GATES PER ASTM F- 900) 12855 SOUND AVENUE ........ WIDTHS UP THRU 6 FEET OR ~2 FEET FOR DOUBLE SWING GATE PER ASTM F~083 KEYED ALIKE FOR ALL SITES SOUTH ELEVATION 9 HEIGHT - 6' VERTICAL (MATCH EXISTING) ~ SITE DETAILS ~ SOU~ ELEVA~ON (~ CHAINLINK FENCE DETAIL SHEET NUMBER IREV. 1 #4 REBARS @ 12' O C EACH WAY / NEW 6'-0" CHAINUNK COMPOUNI NEW OM (2) 12'X2,0' PROIOSED I NEW 8' 0" LOEKABLE DOUBLE SWING GATES (SEE DETAIL 3/A 2) ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ON 8' x 8' POURED CONCRETE PAD STORM DRAir NEW ELECTRIC METER BANK FOR (3) CARRIERS CSC TELCO CADNET ON STRONGWELL PULL BOX NEW OMNIPOINT DUALPOL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE AT 100' AOL OF (B) EQUIPMENT ]0' X 20' CONCRETE SLAB DETAIL 1/A-A) CPS ANTENNA FASTENED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET NEW ELEC/TELCO PANELS MOUNTED TO UNISTRUT FRAME (SEE DETAIL $/A 3 ) 10'_9' 100'-0" MONOPOLE AND FOUNDATION OXIMATE ROUTE OF (24) COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLES IN 18" ALUMINUM CABLE TRAY SET ON PVC SLEEPERS / '~ ENL. A PARTIAL SITE PLAN 8' THICK, 4000 PSi @ 28 DAYS AIR ENTRAINED POURED CONCRETE PAD WITH HAUNCH AT PER,METER 3/4" CHAMFER (TYP) EXISflND GRACE REPLACE/RESTORE 3/4" STONE GROUND COVER ON FILTER FABRIC PROVIDE (4) CONTINUOUS NO 6 REBAR TOP AND DOTTOM 6" THICK LAYER OF COMPACTED SAND OR GRAVEL BASE COMPACT EXISTING SUBGRADE POURED CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD DETAIL SCALE: 3/4"=1' 0" GALV. POST ±3' 0" OR AS REQUIRED ATTACH UNISTRUT TO POST WITH 3/8"¢ BALV U-DOLTS PROVIDE ALL NEW 4ETER, DISC, NECESSARY PANEL & BOXES 2"¢ GALV SCHEDULE 40 PIPE TO BE WELDED TO 12"x~2" OALV STEEL BASE PLATE. UNISTRUT PLOD0 BRACE (AS REQUIRED) NEW 8' POURED 1 4' CONCRETE EQUIPMENT ~ PAD SEE DETAIL ~ 2/A-} FOR MORE / ~ INFORMATION ~ 12"XI2"XS/8" GALV STEEL BASE PLATE EXP BOLT TO NEW CONCRETE PAD WITH (4) 3/8¢ S/S EXPANTION DOLTS WiTH .~" EMBEDMENT i/m'~ UNISTRUT ELEC/TELCO RACK DETAIL APPROVALS PROJECT # 02-4756 Omnipoint ~ COMMUNICATIONS INC. SITE INFORMATION MATTITUCK 12855 SOUND AVENUE MATTITUCK., NY 11952 LI 15-411 B DESIGN TYPE RAW LAND BUILD NEW MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE ENLARGED PARTIAL SITE PLAN & DETAILS SHEET NUMBER A-3 PlaN . EQUIPMENT CABINET 9/16" + + L LL 1' 4 1/16" 6 1/16" PLAN @ SUB-BASE ATTACH CABINET TO 18 GAUGE SHEET METAL SUB-BASE SUPPLIED BY THE CONTRACTOR WITH 1/2" HIGH STRENGTH NEW CONCRETE SECURE NEW OMNIPOINT EQUIPMENT CABINET SUBASE TO NEW CONCRETE SLAB W~TH 1/2" S/S RODS SET IN HILTI HIT HY-1BO CHEMICAL ANCHORS MINIMUM 5-~/2" EMBEDMENT (TYP) TYPICAL EOUIPMENT CABINET DETAILS SCALE: 1/2"= 1 ANTENNA INFORMATION ANTENNA TYPE: EMS WIRELESS MODEL No RR65 19 02DP WIRELESS PA~FORM NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL WIRELESS ANTENNA PLATFORM FOR POLYGON AND ROUND POLE STRUCTURES MANUFACTURED BY VALMONT : MICROFLECT PRODUCT NO '* AS SPECIFIED BEL0~ PER DIAMETER OF MONOPOLE POLE. (VIF) CRATING WORK SURFACE NEW OMNIPDINT PANEL ANTENNAS (TYD FOR 12) 2 5/8"e MICROFLECT ANTENNA MOUNTING PIPE 1YP. OF (12) MICROFLECT TRI INTERFACE BRACKET AS REQUIRED FOR DIAMETER OF MONOPOLE AT HEIGHT ANTENNA MOUNTING PLATFORM SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD TYP. E~a:CTION THRU CABLE TRAY DETNL · TYP. CABLE 'DRAY COVER SCALE: NT.S. ANTENNA CABLE TRAY DETAIL SCALE: 1"=1' 0" WIRELESS PLATFORM FOR POLYGON AND ROUND RULE STRUCTURES SUPPLIED BY CARRIER INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR MONOPOLE FOUNDATION MONOPOLE CABLES (SIZE AS LENGTH REQUIRES.) DRILLING/TAPPING SCREWS 24" 0C TO SECURE COVER. ALUMINUM LADDER TYPE CABLE TRAY, SIZE AS SPECIFIED. PART NUMBER 37-A-12-12(*)-120(**) MANUFACTURED BY 'B-UNE' W/ SOLID FLANGED NON-VENTILATED LOCKABLE COVER PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY HARDWARE, STRAIGHT SECTIONS AND BENDS AS IND)CATED. SECURE CABLE TRAY TO SLEEPERS WITH APPROPRIATE HARDWARE WIDTH AS REQUIRED *~' SECTION LENGTHS AS REQUIRED TO CONCRETE PAD WtTH S/S FASTENERS 4" X 4" PVC SLEEPERS. (2) PER TRAY SECTION STENCIL NOTE ON TOP OF CABLE TRAY @ EVERY 6 FEET SOLID FLANGED ALUMINUM NON VENTILATED CABLE TRAY COVER BY B-LINE (TYP) iU' APPROVALS SIGNATURE DAI~ PROJECT # 02-4756 ~Omnipoint ~ COMMUNICATIONS INC. SITE INFORMATION MATT~TUCK 12855 SOUND AVENUE MATTITUCK,, N.Y. 11952 L1-15 411-B DESIGN TYPE RAW LAND BUILD NEW MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE TYP. EQUIPMENT CABINET & ANTENNA PLATFORM DETAIL SHEET NUMBER RELY. A-4 ANTENNA SCHEDULE EMS RR65-19-O2DP EMS PR65 19 02DP ~i~ANTENNA SCHEDULE BILL OF MATERIALS DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER PART NORTEL SB000 •TS NORTEL 1 1/4" GROUND KITS CABLEWAVE WEATHERPROOFING K~TS CABLEWAVE DIN(M)-DIN(M) 1/2" 6 O" SUPERFLEX JUMPERS CABLEWAVE DIN(M)-DIN(M) I/2" - 6'-0" JUMPERS CABLEWAVE 1 1/4" DIN(F) CONNECTORS CABLEWAVE DUAL POL ANTENNA MODEL # RR65-}9-02DP EMS WIRELESS MECH DOWNTILT BRACKETS EMS WIRELESS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIERS (LNA) DIN(M)-D~N(M) I/2" 3' 0" JUMPERS CABLEWAVE BILL OF MATERIALS LABEL I RED 2 RED 5 RED 4 RE0 5 RE0 6 RE0 7 RED 8 RED 1 WHITE 2 WHITE 3 WHITE 4 WHITE S WHITE 6 WHITE 7 WHITE B WHITE 1 BLUE 2 BLUE S BLUE 4 BLUE 3 BLUE 5 BLUE 7 BLUE B BLUE LEGEND f------I L- __ .-I TYP. SECTOR CABLE ROUTING (~P 4 PER SECTOR) 6'-0" STD JUMPERS COAXrAL CABLES NORTEL 58000 BTS 6'-0' SUPERFLEX /~ I GENERAL NOTES ALL INDICATIONS OF NORTH ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IN FIELD TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO SECTOR ANTENNA INSTALLATION ALL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON DOWNTILT BRACKETS CABLE LENGTHS LISTED ARE APPROXIMATIONS BASED ON THESE PLANS AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR ORDERING CABLE ALL CABLE LENGTHS MUST BE V.IF. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL BRASS TAGS (SUPPLIED BY OMNIPOINT) AT EACH END OF ALL ANTENNA CABLES DENOTING THE NUMBER OF TAPE MARKING BANDS AND COLOR OF TARE MARKING BANDS ANTENNA CABLES WILL BE COLOR CODED AT THE ANTENNA, FILTER iNJECTION CABINET, JUMPER CONNECTIONS AND THE •TS CABINET THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL DRIP LOOPS ON ALL ANTENNA AN0 JUMPER CABLES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL CABLE SUPPORTS AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SPACING OF 3'-0" ON CENTER MIN. CABLE BENDING RADIUS CABLE RADIU~ 1/2" CABLE SUPERFLEX 1 1/4" (FSJ-4-50B) 1/2" CABLE (LDF 4 508) 5r' 7/8' CABLE (LDF-5-50A) 10'* 1 1/4" CABLE (LDF-6 50) 15" 1 5/8" CABLE (LDF 7 SBA) 20" CABLE SIZES/L_E~NGTH~S SECTOR 'A" [] n [] f"l r"l O [] SECTOR'B' 1/2" SUPERFLEX JUMPER (TYP) /~--1/2" JUMPER (TYP) ~ 1 1/4'~ CABLE (TYP FOR SECTOR 'A') ~ ~ ~ ~ DUAL POL o~ ~ o [] DUAL POL [] [] [] [] DUAL POL DUAL POL 1-1/4"¢ CABLE (TYP FOR SECTOR "B") DUAL POL DUAL POL DUAL POL DUAL POL SECTOB "C' 1 1/4"¢ CABLE (TYP FOR SECTOR [] [] ~ [] [] ~ DUAL POL [] [] [] [] DUAL POL [] [] DUAL POL DUAL POL [] o~ ~o [] ' ~'"~ g, NTENNA CABLE ROUTING SCHEMATIC · -'""'"~ ~ i APPROVALS SIGNATURE PROJECT ~ 02-4756 ~Omnipoint ~ COMMUNICATIONS INC. SITE INFORMATION MATTITUCK 12855 SOUND AVENUE MATTITUCK, NY 11952 LI-15-411-B DESIGN TYPE RAW LAND BUILD NEW MONOPOLE SHEET TITLE ANTENNA SCHEDULE, B.O.M., & ROUTING SCHEMATIC SHEET NUMBER REi~