The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-6327 James F. l~ng, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town H~lAnnex 54375M~n Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE # 0489C Date: November 10~ 2009 THIS CERTIFIES that the construction of a single-family dwelling with gutters connected to dr~wells At 205 Private Road #3, Southold, New York Suffolk County Tax Map # 70-6-9 Conforms to the applications for a Trustees Permit heretofore filed in this office Dated 10/31/05 pursuant to which Trustees Wetland Permit # 6327 Dated 3/22/06 was issued and conforms to all of the requirements and conditions of the applicable provisions of law. The project for which this certificate is being issued is for the construction of a single-family dwelling with gutters connected to drgwells The certificate is issued to CARLA STARCIC owner of the aforesaid property. Authorized Signature James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen Bob Ghosio, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631 ) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DATE OF INSPECTION: t~Ch. 275 Ch. 111 INSPECTION SCHEDULE __ Pre-construction, hay bale line/silt boom/silt curtain __ 1~t day of construction conStructed t,'~Project cOmplete, compliance inspection. INSPECTED BY: ~~, COMMEI~ITS: . . ~- /~ . ('~ '.~,.~ ~,..,_11.~ ~l..c_. ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ ~~, GERTIFIGATE OF GOMPLIANGE: James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE J Pre-construction, hay bale line 1st day of construction ¼ constructed v' Project complete, compliance inspection. Board Of Southold 'Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, HEW YORK SCTM~70-6-9 PERMIT 140. _~.,~ ........... DATE: ISSUED TO .~ CARLA STARCTC ..................................... · nl'h rtzati n .... p..~.~nf tO {he orovislons of Chapter 615 of the L~ws the State of blew Yor[, 18931 and CJnapter 404 of the ,1~. ws Of I'h ~fafe of blew Yorlc 19S21 and the Soufhold To~n Ordinance 'tiffed ?RE '~UL;ATING -AND -I~IE.PLAClNG. OF: QBSIRUC~I~S IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LAblDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL-OR OTHER MATERIALS-F~OM LANDS ·UNDER TOWN 'WATERS;~f. and in a~cordanoe wi~h 'the Resolution of The Board adopfed afa meeting held on ~.~.~'..c.b....~2~ · . .2. .0. .0. ~, and in constderatlon of the sum of $...Z.~..-_0.0 ....... paid by Carla Starcic .......................................................................... ~ ......... : ......... Southold' of ......................................... ;.-:- ............................ '~' Y' and subjeol' ~o Terms end C,o~dd~o~s fisted on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees au~horlzes and permlfs the following: Wetland Permit to ¢on~truct a single family dwelling ~nd deck with the condition ~ line of st~ked hay b~e$ and a SiR fence are inst~lled ~long the limR of clearing and ground disturbance prior to construction, dryv~lls are inst~lled to contain the roof run-off, end e~l as depicted on the survey prepared by John T. Met. zger lest revised April 11,200G, all' ~n a~cordance with the detailed specificatlons as presented .the odgi~ating appficafion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. T~e said Board Of Trudees here- ~ causes its Corpo.rafe Seal 1o be affixed, and these ~.resents subscrlbed by 'e majority of the said Board .as of thts dale, TERMS *nd GONDmONS ~J~E~m~ee Carla Starcie 205 Private Rd. #3, Southol~. . ~ ~, ~-~e '~ of ~ ~ ~ ~:of ~ T~ ~ ~d ~ ~l~ ' "' James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 March 22, 2006 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Bruce Anderson Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 RE: CARLA STARCIC 205 PRIVATE RD. #3, SOUTHOLD SCTM#70-6-9 Dear Mr. Anderson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on March 22, 2006 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of CARLA STARCIC applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated October 31,2005, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council and to the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Coordinator for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on March 22, 2006, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of CARLA STARClC to construct a single family dwelling and deck with the condition a line of staked hay bales and a silt fence are installed along the limit of clearing and ground disturbance prior to construction, drywells are installed to contain the roof run-off, and all as depicted on the survey prepared by John T. Metzger last revised April 11,2006. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date the permit is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Inspections are required at a fee of $50.00 per inspection. (See attached schedule.) Fees:S100.00 Very truly yours, Jam~ ;. King President, Board of Trustees JFK/Ims James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Please be advised that your application dated reviewed by this Board at the regular meeting of following action was taken: has been and the ( ./'~Application Approved (see below) (__.) Application Denied (see below) ( ) Application Tabled (see below) If your application is approved as noted above, a permit fee is now due. Make check or money order payable to the Southold Town Trustees. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: TOTAL FEES DUE: $ BY: James F. King, President Board of Trustees Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President February 15, 2006 James King, President Southold Town Trustees P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Starcic Situate: ROW off Oaklawn Avenue, Southold SCTM # 1000-70-6-9 Dear Mr. King, As you know, this Firm represents the applicant referenced above. In the course of the public hearings held on this matter, I have heard the objecting neighbor, Mr. Hardy, claim that the northern portion of the property is a beach and the remaining portion of the property is a bluff. These statements are in accurate. The property does not contain a beach nor does it contain a bluff. Attached herewith is a copy of the Soil Map and attendant soil descriptions and classifications contained in the Soil Survey of Suffolk County, prepared by the US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service CSoil Survey"). The predominant soils contained on the site are Carver and Plymouth Sands (CPA) and this soil classification is distinguished from beaches (Bc). There is no beach on the property. A BLUFF IS DSCRIBED IN THE Town's Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Law as "any bank or cliff with a precipitous or steeply sloped face adjoining as beach or body of water." Its designation in the Town of Southold has been limited to the near shore area adjacent to the Long Island Sound. Bluffs are also described in the Soil Survey as escarpments which having slopes greater than 35%. I attach the Soil Survey description of escarpment hereto. No slopes of 35% or more exist on the property. The property does not contain a bluff. I trust the above is of some assistance to you in the regulation of this property. SUFFOLK COUN'F/', NEW yOEK ~he B horizons range from brown (7.SYR 5/4) to brownish ~ yellow (10YR 6/6). These horizons are single grain or mas- sire to weak granular structure. The C horizon ranges from yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) to yellow (2.5Y 7/6). Carver soils are associated with Plymouth soils. Carver soils are similar to Plymouth soils; but they have a promi- neat A2 horizon, and the upper part of the B horizon is richer in iron and humus. Also associated with Carver soils are Deerfleld soils that have a seasonal high water table within a depth of 18 to 24 inches. Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes ICp^).--These soils are mainly on outwash plains; how- ever, they are also on some flatter hilltops and interven- ina draws on moraines. A small part of this mapping % ;o ol;ohtl~ undulatin~ This unit can be made up entirely of Carver sand, entirely of Plymouth sand, or of a combination of the two soils. The Carver soil in this mapping unit has the profile described as representative of the Carver series. The Plymouth soil has a profile similar to the one described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand throughout the profile, rather than loamy sand. Included with these soils in mapping are small areas of Plymouth loamy, sand and areas of loamy sands that have a profile similar to soils of the Carver series. Also included are soils that are like Carver soils that have dark iron and humus coatings on the sand grains in the upper part of the subsoil. Also included are small areas of Haven or Riverhead soils on moraines that have dense cover of vegetation and a complex topography. The hazard of erosion is slight on the soils in this unit. These soils are droughty. Natural fertility is low. These soils are not well suited to the crops commonly grown in the county. Because these soils tend to be droughty, lawns and shrub plantings are difficult to establish and maintain. Almost all of this unit has been lsat in woodland or in brush. Many areas previously cleared for farming are now idle. Most areas in the west- ern part of the county and near the shores of the eastern part of the county are used for housing developments. Capability unit VIis-l; woodland suitability group 5sl. Carver and Plymouth sands, 3 to 15 percent slopes {CpC}.--These soils are mainly on rolling moraines; how- ever, they are also on the side slopes of many drainage channels on the outwash plains. Individual areas of this mapping unit are large on the rolling topography of the Ronkonkoma moraine, and in these areas slopes are com- plex. On the outwash plain, this unit is in long, narrow strips parallel to drainageways. This unit can be made up entirely of Carver sand, entirely of Plymout]l sand, or of a combination of the two soils. The Carver soil in this mapping unit has a profile similar to the profile described as representative of that series. The Plymouth soil in this unit has a profile simi- lar to the profile described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand through- out the profile, rather than loamy sand. Generally included with this unit in mapping are areas of Plymouth loamy sand or loamy coarse sand that are very close to sand in texture. Also included are small areas of Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 per- cent slopes. Small areas of these soils on moraines are as much as 25 percent gravel throughout, especially along 67 the crests of low ridges. Also included are soils similar to this Carver soll that have dark iron and humus coat- ings on the sand grains in the upper part of the subsoil. In the bottom of many closed depressions, these soils have siltier accumulations from adjoining hillsides; and in some places silty lenses ?re,.d~p !nto the su. bstr_atu,~m~. The hazard of erosion m m~gnt w moderato on ~u~ soils in this unit. These soils are droughty, and natural fertility is low. In some places, slope m a limitation to US~hese soils are not well suited to crops commonly grown in the county. These sandy soils severely limit installation and maintenance of lawns and landscaping shrubs. Almost all of these soils are in woodland. Many areas in the western part of the count~(, particularly along the north shore, are used as homes~tes. Capability unit VIis-l; woodland suitability group 5sL Carver and Plymouth sands, 15 to 35 percent, slopes {C~f).--These soils are almost exclusively on moraines ex- cept for a few steep areas on side slopes along some of the more deeply cut drainage channels on outwash plains. On morainic landforms these areas are large, and slopes generally are complex, especially on the Ronkon- koma moraine. On the outwash plains the areas are in long, narrow strips parallel to the drainage channels. Some areas are made up entirely of Carver sand, others entirely of Plymouth sand, and still others of a combina- tion of the two soils. The Carver soil in this mapping unit has a profile similar to the profile described as representative of that series, except that the ~ravel content is greater, and gravel makes up as muc~ as 15 percent, b~ volume, of ihs soil in some places. The Carver soil in this unit gen- erally is a few inches thinner to the substratum than the soll described as representative. The Plymouth soil in this nnit is similar to the soil described as representative of the Plymouth series, except that its texture is sand rather than loamy sand. Also, it has a higher content of gravel, and gravel makes up as much as 15 percent, by volume, of the soil in some places. Included with these soils in mapping are small areas of loamy sand and small areas of Carver and Plymouth sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, or ~ to 15 percent slopes. Also, on moraines, some areas of this nnit contain as ranch as 30 percent gravel and a few cobblestones. Such areas generally are small and are in a mixed pattern ~vitb soils that contain less gravel. Also included are areas of Montauk loamy sand, sandy variant, 15 to 35 percent slopes, that have a weakly developed fragipen or a fragipan that is at a depth of more than about 4 feet. Also inclnded are soils that are similar to Carver soils that have dark iron and humus coatings on the sand grains iu the upper part of the subsoil. Also included are small areas of Haven and Riverhead soils that have slopes of more than 15 percent. The hazard of erosion is moderate to severe on the soils iu this unit. These soils are droughty, and natural fertility is low. Moderately steep to steep slopes are a limitation to use. The soils of this unit are poorly suite, xt to crops com- monly grown in the county. Areas of these soils have not been cleared for farming. A few areas in the western 62 SOIL SURVEY gna representative profile about 4 inches of organic matter is on the surface. The upper 9 inches is leaves and partly decomposed organic matter, and the lower 2 inches is dark reddish-brown decomposed organic matter. Below this mat is a surface layer of very dark gray sand, 1 inch thick, that contains a large proportion of organic matter. It is underlain by a subsurface layer of ~rhaY, loose sand that extends to a depth of 10 inches. e upper part of the subsoil, to a depth of 15 inches, consists of dark reddish-brown, firm loamy sand. Thc lowerpart, to a depth of about 97 inches, is dark-brown, very friable sand. The substratum, to a depth of 56 inches, is brown to dark-brown, very friable to loose 'sand that contains a few pebbles. These soils have a seasonal high water table. Depth to the water table ranges from about 6 to 18 inches. Perme- ability is rapid in these sandy soils. Available moisture capacity is very low. Reaction is strongly acid to very strongly acid throughout. Natural fertility is low. The response of crops to lime and fertilizer is fair to poor. The root zone is 15 to 20 inches thick. Available mois- ture generally is more than adequate for most plants, but in areas that are drained, little moisture is available to plants that have shallow roots. Representative profile of Atsion sand~ in a wooded area, I mile north of Manorville near the south end of Linus Pond: O1--4 to 2 inches, loose hardwood leaves and partly decom- posed organic matter that contains very many roots. 02--2 inches to 0, dark reddish-brown (SYR 2/2) decom- posed organic matter; very friable; many medium Al--0 to 1 inch, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) sand; massive; clean, white sand grains; very strongly acid; abrupt, A2--1 to 10 inches, light-gray to gray (SYR 6/1) sand; single grain; loose; a few medium roots; very strongly acid; abrupt, irregular boundary. B21h--10 to 15 lnche~, dark reddish-brown (5YR 2/2) loamy B22--15 to 27 inches, dark-brown (10YR 3/3) sand; single (31--27 to 48 inches, brown to dark-brown (10YR 4/3) sand; boundary. (32---48 to 56 inches, brown to dark-brown (10YR 4/3) coarse The solum ranges from 18 to 36 inches in thickness. The in thickness. The A1 horizon dominantly has 10YR hues, but it ranges from black (N 2/0) to very dark gray (10YR 3/1). This hori- The upper part of the B horizon ranges from dark red- dish brown (SYR 2/2) to dark brown (7.5YR 3/2). Consist- grayish brown (10YR 3/2) to pale brown (10YR 6/3). It is very friable. The C horizon ranges from dark grayish brown (I~_YR 4/2) to pale yellow (5Y 7/4). Texture is sand or stratified sand and gravel. It is single grain or massive, and consistence ranges from loose to very friable. Atsion soils are near Berryland soils. Atsion soils are siml- lar to Berryland soils, except that they have a thinner or- depth. Tbese soils are also near Wareham and Walpole soll~, both of which are similar in drainage to Atsion soils bnt they lack a B horizon that has an acoumulation of humus, iron, and aluminum. In addition, Ateion soils are coarser tex- tured than Walpole soils. Atsion sand {^i}.--This is the only Atsion soil mapped in the county. This nearly level, somewhat poorly drained to poorly drained soil is near ponds and creeks and along the bottoms of deeply cut meltwater channels. Most areas are small and irregularly shaped. Areas on channel bottoms are narrow and lo.rig. Included with this soil in mapping are areas of Berry- land, Wareham, and Desrfield soils that are too small to map separately. The hazard of erosion is slight on this Atsion soil. This soil has a high water table, and drained areas have very low available moisture capacity. Scarcity of good outlets makes this soil difficult to drain. This soll is not well suited to crops commonly grown in the county. Very little of this soil has been c~earod. Most areas that have been cleared have been allowed to revert to brush or woodland. In the western part of the ' county, some areas of this soil have been filled to provide sites for homes. The soil is better suited to woodland or to habitat for some types of wildlife than to other uses. Capability unit IVw-1; wood]and suitability group 4wl. Beaches Beaches {Bc} are made up of sandy, gravelly, or cobbly areas between water at mean sea level and dunes or escarpments. Slope is nearly level in most areas but it is as much as 15 percent in some places on the Atlantic shore. All the beaches along Long Island Sound are very gravelly and cobbly. A few very large boulders that rolled down from the adjoining bluffs of the Harbor Hill Moraine are present. The Atlantic Ocean beaches arc sandy except for a few small areas near Montank Point. In most places beaches on the bays are sandy, but varying amounts of gravel are mixed with the sand. These areas are not suited to farming. Measures should be taken to control erosion to keep the beach wide enough to protect the nearby dunes or uplands. Capabil- ity unit VIIIs-1; woodland suitability group not assigned. Berryland Series Thc Berry]and series consists of deep, very poorly drained, coarse-textured soils. These nearly level soils formed in deep sandy outwash deposits on low-lying wet areas adjacent to ponds, tidal creeks, and low-gradient streams or between areas of tidal marsh and better drained nplands. This soil is mainly along the Peconic River. Native vegetation is red maple, blackgum, and highbush blueberry. Sphagnum moss is common. In a representative profile a dark reddish-brown and black layer of organic matter, about 10 inches thick, i~ on thc surfaee. Tbs upper 2 or 3 inches of this organic S~JFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK A2--O~to 6 inches, gray (10YR 5/1) sand; yellowish-brown (10YR 5/4) vertical streaks; single grain; loose; common roots; very strongly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. B21-~} to 8 inches, dark reddish-brown (SYR 3/4), strong- brown (7.SYR 5/6), and dark-brown to brown (7.SYR 4/4) sand; massive; friable; common roots; very strongly acid; abrupt, irregular boundary. B22--8 to 15 inches, olive-yellow (2.5Y 6/6) sand; common, medium, distinct, dark-brown to brown mottles; mas- sive; very friable; common roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. B2~15 to 25 inches, light yellowish-brown (2.5Y 6/4) sand; massive; very friable; a few roots; strongly acid; diffuse boundary. C---25 to 5~ inches, tight-gray (2.5Y 7/2) sand; single grain; loese; strongly acid. The thickness of the solum ranges from 18 to 30 inches. Texture ranges from sand to loamy sand in the solum. In the finer textured part, the soinm thickness corresponds with the upper boundary of the underlying coarse sand or stratified sand and gravel. Volume of coarse fragments in the solum is normally less than 5 percent. It ranges from 5 to 35 percent in the substratum. Reaction is very strongly acid to strongly acid throughout. The O horizons range from dark reddish brown (SYR 2/2) to black (10YR 2/1). A thin, black (10YR 2/1) A1 horizon is present in some profiles. It is dotted with many, clean, white sand grains. The A2 horizon ranges from gray (10YR 5/1) to pinkish gray (5YR 7/2). Where present, the Ap horizon ranges from very dark brown (10YR 2/2) to very dark grayish brown (10YR 3/2). It ranges from 8 to 10 inches in thickness. The B21 horizon ranges from dark reddish brown (SYR 3/3) to strong brown (7.SYR 5/6). There is no mottling in the B21 horizon. Consistence of this horizon is friable, but a few firm lumps are in places. It is massive or single grain. The B22 and B23 horizons are light olive brown (2.5Y or brownish yellow (10YR 6/6). These horizons may have a few mottles that have chromas greater than 2. They are sin- gle grain or massive. The C horizon ranges from olive gray (SY 5/2) to very pale brown (10YR 7/4). In places texture is stratified sand and gravel below a depth of 40 inches. Deerfield soils are mapped near Atsion and Carver soils, and they are similar to these soils. They are associated with soils of the Waroham series in many places. Deerfleld soils have a more ~veakly formed B21 horizon, a thinner organic surface horizon, and greater depth to the water table than Atsion soils. They are similar to the Carver soils, but they generally have a thicker A2 horizon and a seasonal water table at a depth of 18 to 24 inches. Warcham soils lack hori- zons of iron and humus accumulations that are present in the Deerfleld soils, and they are not as deep to the seasonal high water table. Deerfield sand IDe}.--This is the only Deerficld soil lapped in the county. This soil is between areas of )mewhat poorly drained soils and well drained or oxces- ;rely drained soils at slightly higher elevations. Slopes re 3 percent or less and are slightly concave in places. ~xcept for some areas along the south shore, most areas ,f this soil are small. Included with this soil in mapping are moderately :ell drained loamy sand or sand soils that lack a thick, ray subsurface horizon and a horizon of iron and ,umus accumulation. Also included are small areas of ~arver and Atsion soils. The Atsian soils are indicated ,n the detailed map by conventional symbols for wet pots. Areas of Carver soil that have a seasonal high ~ster table at depths of 40 to 50 inches are included ~ith this unit. The hazard of erosion is slight. This soil is fairly well :2ired to crops commonly grown in the country. It is ~aSonally too wet or too dry in the root zone. Natural 69 fertility is low. Small areas of Deerfield sand have been cleared for farming. Generally this soil has been left in woodland with adjoining areas of wetter soils; however, many areas in the southwestern part of the county have been filled and are used as sites for housing develop- monte. In some places slab-type construction has been used without filling. Capability unit IIIw-8; woodland suitability grouP 4ol. Dune Land Dune land {Dy} is made up of moan.ds ~r sm.all, ifil.Is of sand that have been piled up by wind. 1~o son horizons have formed in this sandy material. This land type is mainly along the barrier beach and the la.r~ge area of dunes in the vicinity of Napeague and H~ther Hills State Park. Smaller areas are along Lon~ Island Sound and the bays at the east end of the Soun(~. Slope ranges from I to 35 percent. Vegetation is sl~arsc in some areas, but other areas have a thick cover of pine. Included with this land type in mapping are low- lying, nearly level areas between dunes where ground water is at a depth of 18 to 30 inches in places. Also included are a few small, blown-out areas along the north shore. In these places sand dunes have migrated into the woodland surrounding the blowout. Dram land is suitable only for use as wildlife habita~ or recreation. It should be stabilized and left undis- turbed to provide protection from storms and high tides. Structures on sand dunes are subject to damage from coastal storms. Capability unit VIIIs-1; woodland suit- ability group not assigned. Escarpments Escarpments {£s} are made up of bluffs that have slopes greater than 35 percent. Most areas are alonj~ the north shore, but a few are near Peeouic Bay an~ along the Atlantic coastline near Montauk Point (fig. 12). Areas are also along the coastline of offshore islands. The soil horizons have not formed in this actively eroding material. Except for a few scattered areas, this unit is devoid of vegetation. Generally the slopes are m~iform with very little dissection except on the more resistant material around Montauk Point and on parts of Gardiners Island. Height of the escarpments ranges from about ~0 feet to more than 100 feet. The material in the escarpments is sand along the uorth shore and sandy loam or loamy sand at Montauk Point. In the northeast and western parts of Gardiners Island, the material contains a fairly high proportion of reddish clay. Many escarpments have large boulders embedded in the soil, which roll to the beach as the escarpment erodes. Escarpments are used by some species of songbirds. Where possible, slopes should be stabilized to reduce ero- sion. Capability unit VIIIs-2; woodland suitability group not assigned. Fill Land, Dredged Material Fill land, dredged material {~d}, is made up of areas that have been filled with material from hydraulic or mechanical dredging operations. These operations are SUFFOLK James F. King, President Jill M. Doherty, Vice-President Peggy A. Dickerson Dave Bergen John Holzapfel Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-6641 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Board of Trustees Field Inspection/Worksession Report Brief Description of proposed action: Typic of area to be impacted: (.~Jgaltwater Wetland Freshwater Wetland Sound Front Distance of proposed work to edge of above: ~,~ q Bay Front P~C of Town Code proposed work falls under: hapt.97 Chapt. 37 other / Type of Application: ~'Sffetland __Coastal Erosion ~Amendment __Administrative ~_Emergency Info needed: ''t ~-I ~ (~' · ~o~e i o'~' _?o .5<4 '76' Conditions: present Were.~J.King __J.Doherty ~/~P.Dickerson D. Bergen~J~.Holzapfel Mailed/Faxed to: Date: Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Halt 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971-0959 CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wed., December 14, 2005, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Don Wilder, seconded by Jennifer Mannino, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS of the Wetland Permit application of CARLA STARCIC to construct a single-family dwelling and deck. Located: 205 Private Rd. #3, Southold. SCTM#70-6-9 The CAC recommends Approval of the.application with the following Conditions: no fertilized lawn areas all roof run-off must be contained in drywells on the landward side of the road all property drains contained on site save as many 8" DBA trees as possible. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried r F 5CTN~: t ooo-ozo-o~-oo~ F F F ~]a ori~ o[ subject ~arce] an~ the current condltlons there. C - F FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF r r r r r~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r F F r F F F F F r F F r F r r r r r r~ r dwelling. ~lP~otos ~;~ken /o/2 ?/2oof * r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r F F r , r~rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ~ronosecl cMelling, bne indicates the approxm~aze footvrint of the ~roposea r IF' Jweltin8' r r '~3oto6 t~}en lOfllffllOOfi~ r r r r r r r r [. r F F F F rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Starc~c' ®ropert.~ ~tuatc: n/s ~xoacl ~5 (K~g¼t-of-Wag)~ To~,n of ~out¼olJ, N~ ~SCTN~: ~ ooo-o7o-o6-oo9 clwcllhng. Lithe inJicates the approximate [oot_~rint of the Dr-ODO5¢CI clwclling. 10/2 r r r F r F r r r F F F r F r' r r' r r r r F r r r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r ~oto $~owin~ ~:¼e M:a~e$ in~icM:in,~ t¼e location o[ t~e pro?o~¢~J sanitar~ 5~$~:em. r r r r r r r r~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Starcic ~ho~:o showin~gthe JocP. i% assemblb ocatect across the I ~' ~,g¼t-otLWa9 orrFe¼e noAhern ore vert~ tine. rrrr~ r r F Situate: n/s Road # ~ (Right~of~Way); Southold, New York SCTM #: i000~070~o6_ ooo SITE GREEK DOC,K joCKEY .¢.¢',,~. ~,' ,, 97.37: 76,1 16/. pRIVA .flS'O0 Oaklavzn Ave. [ ROAi:) LYNN r~u' NIOI~ CHARLES 0 / HARDY ' ~?~o,e~o~z. SUR~Y OF 0 ~ ~I 15 ~ - . ~-~,~ PROPESTY . pINE ~ ~ , ~.~°" ~o~ ~, ~ TO WN OF SO'OLD AREA: , ~ ~ ft. ~ ~, ~,~ ~o,~ to tie lin~ ' ~ ~o~ ~o~ 1000-70-06-09 ~~,~ ~.~ SCALE.. I -30 ' ', ~co~s~ ~ s~ ' MAY I2, 2005 . 17 by McDONALD GEOSC'I6~4.',q The Iocdions ol we/Is ond cesspools APR[ II~ ~Vl~ shown hereon ore from field o~servdiofls and or from dala oflldned from others. I om familiar w/Ih /he STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE SElYAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES ~nd w~ ale/de by /he condillons se/ forth /herein ~nd on peri.fi 10 CO~kUCI~ ANY ALTERATION OR ADOITION TO THIS SURVEY JS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NE~ YORK STATE F_DUCAT ON LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209 - SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREgN ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. ADDITIONALLY TO COMPLY WITH SAID LAW TERM ' ALTERED BY ' MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS UTILIZING A COPY OF ANOTHER SURVEYOR'S MAP. TERMS SUCH ' INSPECTED ' AND · BROUGHT - TO - DATE ' ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW. ,,% (651} 765 - 5020 FAX'I~t.~,~7 P. O. BOX 909 1230 TRAVELER STREE"T SOUTHOLD~ N.Y. 11971 87 - 866 D PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Town of Southold Board of Trustees From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: February 15, 2006 Re: Proposed Permit to Construct a single family dwelling Carla Starcic SCTM#1000-70-6-9 Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. on behalf of CARLA STARCIC requests a Wetland Permit to construct a single-family dwelling and deck. Located: 205 Private Rd. #3, Southold. SCTM#70-6-9 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to me, it is my recommendation that the proposed action is INCONSISTENT with the denoted following Policy Standards and therefore is INCONSISTENT with the LWRP. Policy 6 Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystem. 6.3 Protect and restore tidal and freshwater wetlands. Comply with statutory and regulatory requirements of the SouthoM Town Board of Trustees laws and regulations for all Andros Patent and other lands under their jurisdiction 1. Comply with Trustee regulations and recommendations as set forth in Trustee permit conditions. The proposed setback from the wetland system is 75 feet[ a minimum separation distance of 100' is required pursuant to Chapter 97. Please require that the applicant amend the application to meet the above policy to the greatest extent possible, Additionally, if the action is approved and to further Policy 5: Protect and Improve Water Quality in the Town of Southold 1. Require erosion and sediment controls (haybales~ silt fencing) to protect the wetland system to the north of the property. 2. Require native disease-resistant and drought-tolerant landscaping to minimize irrigation and fertilizer applications. 3. Require gutters~ downspouts and sub-surface drywells to control stormwater runoff. Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Board of Trustees shall consider this recommendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Albert J. Krupski, President John Holzapfel, Vice President Jim King Martin H. Garrell Peter Wencz¢l BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town H~l 53095MainRoad P.O. Box 1179 Southol~New York 11971 Telephone (631 ) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1823 Office Use only X Waiver/Amendment/Changes /Received Application: /Received Fee: $ / Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I__Type II__Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) CAC Referral Sent: /Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ~Public Hearing Resolution: Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Grandfather Permit Application OCT 3 I Name of Applicant Carla Starcic Address 243 Morningside Avenue Cliffside Park, NJ 070101 Phone Number(201) 376-7429 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000-070-06-009 Property Location: n/s Road #3 (Right-of-Way); Southold, NY AGENT: Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Address: P.O. Box 2003 Bridgehampton, NY 11932 Phone Number: (631) 537-5160 Fax: #(631) 537-5291 Board of Trustees ApF Land Area ( in square feet) Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: GENERAL DATA : 9, 016 square feet Improved with dock assembly only. Improve with single family residence. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency X No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Applicant proposes to construct a private single family residence with decking within subject property. of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: Applicant proposes to construct a private single family residence with decking within subject property. Area of wetlands on lot: 225 · square feet Percent coverage of lot: 2.5 ± % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0.0 feet (wood dock) Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 75.0 ± feet (proposed decking) Does the project involve excavation or filling: No X Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? 300.0 ± cubic yards (proposed underground garage) How much material will be filled? N/A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed: 10.0' ±; or deposited: N/A Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: N/A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Typical excavators and front-end loaders, as well as by hand. Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): No impact to the wetlands are anticipated due to the conforming setback from the vegetated edge of the tidal wetlands boundary, as well as the installation of staked haybales and siltation fencing during construction to prevent any and all run-off from entering Jockey Creek. 3 Board of Trustees Ap~ COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA N/A Purpose of Proposed Activity: Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from the implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk ) State of New York ) Matt D. Ivans BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES H~RMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRA~NTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN~ME__ ~THIS /~%ary Public Matthew D. Ivans Notary Public ol New York No. 011V6053859 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires Janua~ 22. 200 '~ Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (where applicant is not the owner) I, CARLA STARCIC residing at 243 Morningside Avenue; Cliffside Park~ New Jersey 07010, do hereby authorize Suffolk Environmental Consulting~ Inc. to apply for (Agent) permit(s) from the Southold Board of Trustees on my behalf. (Owner's signature) 14-16-4 (9/95)-Text 12 PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNESTED AC'I1ON$ Only SEQR PART t- PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) I. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. STARCIC 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Tow11 of Southold County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc. or provide map) n/s Road # 3 (RJ~ht-of-Way); Southold, New York (SCTM #: 1000 - 070 - 06 - 009) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Applicant proposes to construct a Two-Story Single Family Dwelling (four bedrooms) & Garage (underneath) measuring 837 square feet ± ("footprint"); Front Deck measuring 85 square feet ±; and Rear Deck measuring 140 square feet ±, all within subject property. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND EFFECTED: Initially <0.1acres Ultimately <O. l acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No If No, desa'ibe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? []Residential J-'llndust~tal []Commercial []Agriculture []Park/Forest/Open space []Other Describe: Private single family residences with related appurtenances. 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? [] Yes []No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals Suffolk County Department of Health Services; NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation approval. 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicont/sponso~ name: ][VJ[~a.~t'D. ]vans - Suffolk Environmental Consulting, [nc. Date: 7/25/05 Signature: //~~ ' If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you am a state agency, complete tile Coastal I Assessment Form before proceeding with this as~e~_ __.~ne~t OVER PART II- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A, DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.127 use the FULL EAF. [] Y~ [] No If yes, coordinate the review process and B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, sun'ace or groundwater quality, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archeological, historical or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitat, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or change in use or intensity of use of land or natural resources? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: C6. Long term, shoil term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? []Yes []No D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain briefly PART III - DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important, or otherwise significant. Each effect should be essassed in connection with its (a) sntting (i.e. urban er rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II wes checked yes, the determination and significance muet evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA, [] Check this box if you have identified one er more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Off~cer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (if different From responsible officer) Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-~ ~l BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application of ......... .................... COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ~i~g~ly~wo~, depos~ ~d say: That on the ~ day offS, 200~I personally posted ~e prope~y ~own as by placing the Bo~d of Trustees official poste~ w~re it c~ e~ily be seen, ~d ~at I have checked to be s~e the poster has remained in placq for eight days prior to the date of the public hearing. Date ofhe~ing noted thereon to be held ~. ~, ~/. ~ ~ (signature) Sworn to before me this Maffhew D, Ivans Notary PuBlic o! New Yo~ No. 01W6053859 Oualified in Suflolk County 2 Commission Expires January 22, 20~ Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537~5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Regular Mail December 5, 2005 Mr. Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re.' Hearing Date: Situate: SCTM #: Starcic Application December 21~t, 2005 Road #3 (right-of-way) Town of Southold, New York 1000 - 070 - 06 - 09 DEC, - 6 2005 Dear Mr. Kmpski, As you may remember, this Firm represents the owner of the above referenced property who is seeking approval from your Board to construct a new single family dwelling thereon. This matter has been added to the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold agenda for December 21 2005. Therefore, in accordance with Town Code, please find enclosed herewith: 1) Signed and Notarized.dffMavit of Mailing; and 2) Original Certified Mailing Receipts & copies of the same; and 3) Copy of the LegalNotice that was mailed to adjacent property owners. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office at any time. Thank you in advance for your attention and consideration. William J. Lohn encl. cc: R. Starcic Name: John F. Russel & Michele Dove PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Address: 15Fa~agutP| Amityvill¢,NYll701 Maria Vampore-Giocoli 2169 47t~ Street Astoria, NY 11105 DEC - 6 zuu5 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK0 William J. Lohn, residing at Suffolk Environmental Consultingr Inc.; 2322 Main Street~ Brid~eham~tonr NY 11932 , being duly sworn deposes and says that on the 5__~ day of December 2005, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Bridgehampton, that said Notices wer~ ~led to each of said persons by (certified) (registered~ Sworn to before me this da}~2005 Notary Public Matthew D. Ivaos Notary Public of New No. 01JV6053859 Ouatified in Suffolk CounW Commission Expires January 22, 2000 6 Suffolk Environmental Consulting, Inc. Newman Village, Suite E, 2322 Main Street, P.O. Box 2003, Bridgehampton, New York 11932-2003 (631) 537-5160 Fax: (631) 537-5291 Bruce Anderson, M.S., President Via Regular Mail October 27, 2005 Mr. Albert J. Krupski, President Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re-' Situate: SCTM #: Starcic Property n/s Road #3 (Right-of-Way) Town of Southold, NY 1000-070-06-09 OCT 3 I ',2uu5 Dear Mr. Krupski, This Finn represents Ms. Sturcic, owner of the above referenced property, who is seeking all required regulatory approval to construct a single family dwelling with decking thereon. Accordingly, approval from your Board is required. To that end, please find enclosed herewith: (1) Town of Southold Trustees Wetlands Permit Application; (2) Short Environmental Assessment Form; (3) Local Waterfront Revitalization Program Consistency Assessment Form; (4) Photographs of the location of the proposal (two [2] sets); (5) Location Map for easy reference (two [2] copies); (6) Survey of subject property, prepared by Peconic Surveyors, indicating all proposed improvements, last dated May 12th, 2005 (two [2] copies); (7) Cheek made payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $250.00 covering the requisite application fee. By way of this correspondence and on behalf of our client, please commence technical review of this application and schedule this matter for the next available public hearing. If you have any questions, or require additional information please feel free to contact this office at any time. Thank you as always for your attention and consideration. Town of Southold LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM INSTRUCTIONS 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, gaafl-eompl/~t~ ~is CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to,supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area (which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes", then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 070 06 009 The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board [] Planning Dept. [] Building Dept. [] Board of Trustees [] 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Applicant proposes to construct a private single-family dwellin~/~arage (837 square feet ± "footprinf')~ north decking (85 sauare feet +)i south decking (140 square feet ±)~ north pervious driveway (300 square feet ±)~ south pervious driveway (300 square feet ±)7 sanitary system. Location of action: Site acreage: n/s Road # 3 (Right-of-Way off Oaldawn Avenue); Southold~ NY 0.2 acre ± Present land use: Improved only with private docking assembly Present zoning classification: If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Carla Starcic (b) Mailing address: 243 Mornln~.side Avenue; Cliffside Parlq NJ 07010 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( 201 ) 376 - 7429 (d) Application number, if any: N/A Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes [] No [] If yes, which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section iii- Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable As indicated within Policy 1 r "Development that does not reinforce the traditional land use pattern of the Town of Southold would result in a loss of the community and landscape character of Southold.'r this project is a proposal to improve upon a vacant lot situated in a neighborhood consisting primarily of similarly-sized single-family dwellings within similarly-sized properties. The proposalt as designed, will not result in adverse effects to the surrounding environment in that the project has been designed in such a way as to maintain or exceed all required regulatory conditions associated with improving on a lot situated in proximity to the sudace waters surrounding the lown of Southold. In addition, the surrounding neighborhood is comprised of older residential dwellings which have existed harmoniously within this area for years and have not resulted in any form of adverse effects to the surrounding environment. Accordinglye we believe that this project is consistent with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Policy 2 is not applicable in that subject lot and the surrounding neighborhood cannot be deemed a substantial historic and/or archaeological resources. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 5 through 7 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will not adversely impact the visual quailW of the surrounding area in that the surrounding area is currently comprised of properties improved with single-family dwellings of similar~ if not larger, size. Scenic resources, assumedly views of Jockey Creek to the north, are not at risk due to the property being currently heavily screened with vegetation and not offering any form of scenic resource for the property owners surrounding subject lot. Furthermore, this policy could not preclude the legal creation of this property as a building lot. Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will fully comply with Policy 4 in that the location of the improvements within subject property are to be situated above the ten foot (10.0') elevation contour which will provide ample protection during a severe storm event. Accordingly~ the proposal will not result in any form of loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will comply with Policy 5 in that the property will utilize public water, as well as to utilize an efficient sanitary system~ which will be compliant with the requirements of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. Accordingly~ no adverse impacts to either the water quality and/or water supply of Southold Town are anticipated. At~ach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal will comply with Policy 6 in that the improving of this lawfully created residential building lot is to be designed to meet the environmental guidelines and requirements of both the Town of Southold Board of Trustees and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation~ and consequently~ will maintain the integrity of the surrounding ecosystem. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal is simply to improve subject property with a typical single-family dwelling and related appurtenances which historically do not result in any form of adverse effects to air quality. Accordingly, this proposal is not applicable with this policy. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve disposal and/or transportation of solid waste~ hazardous waste~ toxic pollutants, petroleum products. Attach additional sheets if necessary PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is consistent with this policy in that the placement of all improvements will be situated within the southern portion of the property opposite the shoreline to the northt as well as maintaining the existing Right-of-Way that extends through the central section of subject property~ which will provide access and continue to allow for the recreational use of the coastal waters contiguous to said prope~o/(i.e. Jockey Creek). Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependence uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section HI - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable 5ubiect proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve a water<lependent use (i.e. marinat aquaculture, etc...). Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town Waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subiect proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve any form of marine resource management (i.e. commercial fisheries, recreational fisheries, aquaculture, etc...). Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section IH - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicable Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve agricultural lands (i.e. the conversion of farmland, the establishment and/or maintenance of new coastal agricultural productione etc...) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. [] Yes [] No [] Not Applicablc Subject proposal is not applicable in that the proposal does not involve the conservation of energy resources on a commercial level and/or the promotion of alternative energy sources, proper maintenance of fuel storage facilities and/or the extraction of mineral extraction At~ach additional sheets if necessary Created on 5/25/05 ll:20 AM NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Carla Starcic SCTM# 1000-070-06-09 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That is the intention of the undersigned to from the Board of Trustees to: request a Permit Applicant proposes to construct a private single, family residence with decking within subject property. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: n/s Road # 3 (Right-of-Way); Southold, NY 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment. You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Carla Starcic 9/AILING ADDRESS:243 Morningside Avenue; Clifford Park, NJ 07010 PHONE # (201) 376 - 7429 Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. MAR 2 9 2006 SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUA TED A T MATTITUCK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK S.C. TAX No. 1000-94-01-12.2 SCALE 1"=30' SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 FEBRUARY 1, 2006 TOPO OF BLUFF AREA = 41,184.10 sq. (TO TIE LINE) 0,945 aC. CERTIFIED TO; TERRY TRIADES FRANCES TRIADES ~OTES 1 ELEVATION6 ARE REFERENCED TO N,G,V O. 1929 DATUM EXISTING ELEVATIONS ARE 6HOWN THUS:~L~ N,Y.S, Lm No, 49668 A. Ingegno Surveyor PHONE (631)727-2090 Fax (651)727-1727 25-284~