Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-55.-6-36 MAJOR SUBDIVISION Complete application received Yield map received Ok'e 1S +�5- Com 18 Ws I Application reviewed at work session i�roJ OK I xro.2 OK Applicant advised of necessary revisions 1 Revised submission received i ro� OK, � � Ck Sketch plan approval , �, _ a -with conditions Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination p Preliminary maps received poln ® Preliminary maps reviewed at work session aero. LK� 00 -revisions Nro,� OK 07 W U Road profiles/drainage submitted Perot OK 6 -1 0 -revisionsn o Road profiles/drainage reviewed be Engineer intro. 0!C 0 Z i roE OK F _ �_��I��IZ�9� t Sent to County Planning Commission ttetl rp;„ —i T OK jw�sotrtt� +m.L Receipt of County Planning Report OK Review of SCPC report o N _ Preliminary hearing M,6,�-x M Preliminary approval fel; it zo . -with conditions —7 1 ev r� ?Sp Sent to Fire Commissioner ��Iti� > a! co - Receipt of firewell location cQ �n�s Notification to applicant to include on final map Draft Covenants and Restrictions received rAM sero. OK 0 CD C Draft Covenants and Restrictions reviewed i mt OK x Filed Covenants and Restrictions received V) F-' V Bond estimate submitted Bond adopted by PB �f�s19s Bond adopted by TB Payment of bond Payment of inspection fee Determination of park&playground fee Park&playground fee adopted by TB Payment of park&playground fee ,Qp Open Space documents � LKL�• Documents reviewed by TA i E OK Receipt of mylars and paper prints with Health approval Final Public Hearing Approval of subdivision -with conditions ,„S ,1,11Se Endorsement of subdivision i Coastal Environmental Corpse environnt plarming&permits 42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statements 1 East Quogue,New York 11942 route management regulatory compliance l (631)653 3399 fax (631)653 3451 Board cerdJ&dEnvironmenW/Projesslonals e-mail jlsconst@optonline.net October 11, 2001 D Ms Valerie Scopaz QCT 1 Planning Director Town of Southold SoutholdTown Town Hall-53095 Main Street d Southold,New York 11971 RE: Bayberry Estates Subdivision SCTM No. 1000-55-6-35,36 & 56-1-1 Laurel Avenue Southold,NY Dear Ms Scopaz, In 1991 a LEAF and Narrative Statement was filed with Southold's Planning Board for the above referenced application, an 18-lot clustered subdivision on (+/-) 50 acres. In September 2001, the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) sent the attached letter to Young & Young, the applicant's engineer. During a telephone inquiry, the SCWA instructed Mr. Tom Wolpert to discuss the matter directly with Southold Town. For this purpose, Mr. Wolpert has asked I arrange a meeting with you or your representatives because I prepared the original LEAF and Narrative, which included water resource information requested in the SCWA scoping list. Please contact either Tom or me to arrange a time and date unless it is more convenient to discuss this matter over the phone or let us know by letter what information you require. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We would be pleased to provide Southold and/or the SCWA with additional information but do not want to overburden the planning or SEQRA review processes with redundant reports. Thank you. V yo s, Je Seeman, CEP REM Cc al Environmental Corporation • FAX MESSAGE FROM: Coastal Environmental Corporation environmental planning&permits 42 Lewis Road wetlands impact statements East Qoogue,New York 11942 waste management regulatory compliance (631)653 3399 fax (631)653 3451 Board Cert7Jkd Environ nm[Projessknols e-mail jlscoast@optonline.net DATE: TO: FAX NO.: SUBJECT: NO.OF PAGES: CC �CfJDv7 � D U�� RE: Bayberry Estates @ Laurel Avenue,Southold Dear Valerie, The following fax concerns a request for direction regarding a recent letter we received from SC WA. We understand you are VERY busy and if you cannot meet with us please lets us know how we may proceed. Thank you. Jeff Seeman CC.T. Woplert,YOUNG&YOUNG SM UFFOEK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY puael hi sr Fxacutive Ofioer ran, De4060 Sunrise Highway. Oakdale, New York 11769 Deputy Chiet for Customer service (631)589-5200 Fax (631) 563-0356 September 18, 2001 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert Young & Young 4',10 Ostrander Avenue R;erhead, NY 11901 Re Proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision Laurel Avenue, Southold ".I-\4 41000-55-6-35, 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Derr h1r. Wolperl: The Water Authority has received your client's application for public water for the above referen d . bdivision The environmental impacts of supplying water to the subdivision must be a.nai-�zed before. the Water Authority can consider supplying water to the project. :? s recommended that the impacts be addressed as part of the supplemental environmental z riev: Of'the project required by the Town of Southold The impacts should be analyzed in UcnjUmctior with the Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy endorsed by file Tov:n and the water service area map adopted by the Town in July, 2000. The enclosed scraping checklist provides a framework for conducting such analysis. You rnav wish to contact the Town concerning their requirements for the environmental review. tier•, irui, vours, M-Knael R. Franlc F_nciosure Scoping Checklist I. Cover Sheet A. Indicate whether draft, supplemental or final EIS B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the statement and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of draft EIS or draft SEIS G. In the case of a draft EIS's, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated II. Table of Contents and Summary A. Brief description of the action B. Significant, beneficial and adverse impacts (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) III. Description of the Proposed Action A. Project purpose need and benefits L Background and history 2. Public need for the project, and municipal objectives based on adopted community development plans 3. Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action B. Location 1, Establish geographic boundaries of the project 2. Description of access to the site 3. Description of existing zoning of the site 4. Other: C. Design and Layout 1. Total site area a. proposed impervious surface area b. amount of land to be cleared c. open space 2. Structures a. layout of buildings b. site plans and profile view 3. Other D. Approvals Required IV. Environmental Setting A. Water Resources (Groundwater) 1. Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas a. quality b. quantity c. seasonal variation d. depth to water table 2. Identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater a. private water supply b. public water supply c. location of existing wells d. agricultural uses e. commercial/Industrial uses f. seasonal variation B. Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing land use and zoning a. description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area b. description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area c. description of any affected agricultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site 2. Description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area a. Southold master plan b. Southold water supply management and watershed strategy c. special groundwater protection area plan 3. Other C. Public Water Service 1. Existing facilities 2. Current usage levels 3_ Projected future usage levels 4. Projected future facilities V. Significant Environmental Impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section N that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action including cumulative impacts as measured against Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy and provide discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impacts Describe measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Section V. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented VIII. Alternatives IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources X. Appendices PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSO$ { C �p� OG Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD yeti/� �� P.O. Box 1179 kV ti ^+ Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. q �y • Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. y Oj7 Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNE H L.EDWARDS Oj 41."zWILLIAM J. CREMERS 0.1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 26, 1997 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: I have reviewed your letter dated June 11, 1997, in regard to the steps which must be taken to reactivate the above mentioned subdivision. As noted in my June 18, 1996 letter, the Planning Board denied any further extension of the preliminary approval and determined that the preliminary approval expired. Further, the Board determined that if the information required to complete the final subdivision was submitted in a reasonable amount of time, an application fee equal to half that required for a new subdivision would be required. Upon submission of the above mentioned application fee, a thorough review of the file will be conducted and another preliminary hearing will be held. If the preliminary submission is in final form, the Planning Board may waive the requirement for a final hearing. Please refer to the Board's letter of December 16, 1992, which lists the information to be contained in the final submission. Any items which were not completed should be addressed as part of the new preliminary submission. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa piro Planner • DONALD A. RETTALIAT• 1�1� 'Atas4y 770 MOTOR PARKWAY MS SUITE 200 HAUPPAUGE.NY 117e8-5260 =4A LM A RETTAUATA PHONE;(516)342-9700 FAX: (516)232-1938 :7k NALO A.RE-1 ,ALIATA.JR. June 10, 1996 . . y VIA FAX TRANSMISSION � 111996 t Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board pLprsral? �-- P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivisicn. for Bayberry Estates SCTMI 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Ward: The preliminary approval on the above subdivision application was extended until June 14 , 1996 by the Planning Board in ordar that an application might be 'made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for permission to use private wells instead of hooking up to water provided by the Tillage of Greenport: which is not processing new applications. An application has keen , filed with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services which then required an application to that Department's Board of Reviewiwhich has also been filed. The Department of Health Services_, will not schedule a public hearing until water samples have been furnished to them. The Department of Health Services located where they want the test wells driven and the applicant's surveyor, Young and Young, has staked those locations. A contract to drive the test wells has been entered into with Casola Well Drillers, Inc. and as soon as the wells have been dMven and water sampled, the results will be furnished to the Department of Health Services so a hearing date can be set. The purpose of this letter is to show the Southold Planning. Board that the applicant has 'been diligently pursuing the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval for providing wells and to request an additional extension of t!%e time to submit the final map because of the various built-in delays in this application process to the Department of Health Services . Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, DONALD A. RETTALZATA DA :ms TOTHL F.u3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER• -✓BUFFO( Q C Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD 11)y�0�' aG P.O. Box 1179 Chairman �7G GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. Southold, New York 119T1 y2 Fax (516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J.CREMERS ��N7 Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS �JOI �aO✓r PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 18, 1996 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of June 10, 1996 , in which you requested an additional extension of preliminary approval, at the June 17 , 1996 work session. The Planning Board is aware that you have been pursuing approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for an extended period of time. However, the Planning Board has established a policy of granting no more than two extensions of preliminary approval . As you know, many more than two extension have been granted for the above mentioned subdivision. The Planning Board is not in favor of granting any additional extensions for the proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision. Therefore, the Board considers the preliminary approval expired. To pursue the subdivision approval, all of the outstanding information required to complete the final subdivision must be submitted in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, a new application fee must be submitted. The fee required is half that required for a new subdivision and is to be calculated as follows : $500 . 00 plus $50 . 00 per acre or part thereof. Upon receipt of the above mentioned information, the Planning Board will schedule another preliminary hearing. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, I' Melissa Sp ro Planner DONALD A. RETTALIATA P T770 MOTOR PAWWAY SUfTE ZOO HAUPPAGM NY ff78B-5260 (516)342-9700 FAX(516)232-1938 DONALD A.RETTALIATA OF OOLXd9EL DONALD A.RETTAUATA.JR. June 11, 1997 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road U LS (J P.O. Box 1179 IIJ� Southold, NY 11971 0 ( 2 Re: Bayberry Estates, Southold Dear Melissa: P As I assume you are aware, the Suffolk County Water Authority and the Village of Greenport have apparently reached an agreement as to the Water Authority purchasing the bulk of the Village' s water system including all of it outside of the Incorporated Village. I realize that this agreement must still be ratified before it becomes final, but in anticipation of that happening, I would like to know what steps have to be taken at this time to reactivate the approval for the above subdivision. It would appear that we had concluded all other issues other than the actual preparation of covenants and restrictions . Now that the ability to provide water is being resolved, it would appear that we could go forward at this time with a view towards completing Town matters in a timely fashion to coincide with the Water Authority' s takeover. I realize that we may be jumping the gun somewhat in this regard since I assume the Authority will have to make various provisions for furnishing the water once they take over the system, but I want to at least firm up what steps we have to take at this time in terms of the Town Planning Board. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Cordially, �l D :ma DONALD A. RETTALIATA DONALD A. RETTALIATA Cb T770 MOTOR PARKWAY SUITE 200 HAUPPAGUE NY tt766-5260 (518)342-9700 FAX(516)232-1938 DONALD A.RETTAUATA OF COUNSEL DONALD A.RETTALIATA.JR. January 22, 1997 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road ;I ! P.O. Box 1179 JAN 2 3 Southold, New York 11971 1 LL ,._.. Re : Bayberry Estates Southold SOiITfl0lDTOWN y � ' PLAP1p;iYJG BOARD Dear Melissa: In furtherance of various conversations, this letter is for the purpose of reporting to you and the Planning Board as to the current status of this proposed subdivision. The applicant continues to push for approval of this subdivision, but is still being thwarted by the Village of Greenport' s not having public water available. It is my understanding based upon a meeting with the Mayor that the Board will be further extending its moratorium on providing water to new subdivisions which I believe currently expires in January 1997 . In order to proceed further at this time, the applicant has made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review for permission to install private wells on the parcels that demonstrate water quality meeting Department of Health Services standards . In addition, the applicant would be agreeable to installing dry lines for water service once the water is available and of hooking up all homes being serviced by private wells at that time. This application to the Board of Review is similar in nature to one that has already been approved as to a subdivision in the Town of Southold and as to one that is currently pending. 0 0 If you have any further needs from me at this time, please let me know. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, DONALD A. RETTALIATA PLANNING BOARD MEMBEIP gpFFO(,t ftICHARDC� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ChainnG.WARD ��O Gym P.O. Box 1179 o= -� Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS c Telephone(516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 9,��1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 13 , 1996 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed your letter of March 1, 1996 at the March 4 , 1996 work session. The Planning Board, in a letter dated December 16 , 1992 , listed the information required to complete the final submission. Item Number 3 noted that a valid water contract from the Village of Greenport was required. If the Health Department approves the subdivision map without requiring public water, item Number 3 is not necessary. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Melissa ro Planner P MS LAW OFFICES MARS. SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11788-5820 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 518 232-1717 RAYMOND G.RERINI WALTER MACLYN CONLON PAX(512)232.1747 MAUREEN S.MOERGER DONALD A RETTALIATA GLENN B.GRUDER March 1, 1996 S� Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Ld�� Planning Board, Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 d Vf Southold, NY 11971SpJTNOLDT JVN !!!k FLANNiNG BOARD Re: Bayberry Estates Our File No. 12 , 665 Dear Melissa: AS you are aware, we are continually held up as to our submission of a final subdivision map due to the failure of the Village of Greenport to enter into an agreement to provide water. We have met with Suffolk County Department of Health Services as to this matter and they have agreed that we can apply to their Board of Review for permission to install individual wells on any parcels that are built until such time as public water becomes available. However, I note that pursuant to the Planning Board's Resolution granting preliminary approval, it is necessary for us to furnish a valid water contract with the Village of Greenport as part of our final submission. We would like to amend that requirement in order to delete it with the Planning Board relying on the fact that subdivision map cannot be filed with the Suffolk County Clerk and the property subdivided until and unless the Suffolk County Department of Health Services signs the map and they will not sign the map unless there is proper sanitary and potable water available. Please let me know how we might approach having this requirement deleted. We would certainly be happy to meet with you or anyone you might recommend to discuss this matter further. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata DAR:ms cc: Thomas C. Wolpert, PE Francis O'Malley PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS* gpfFO(,� • �Q CO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARDh�0 Gy P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o= Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y Z Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. 0 WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone(516) 765-1938 y • KENNETH L.EDWARDS �IJOl u �.a0 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 12, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Proposed major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 11, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from December 14, 1995 to June 14, 1996. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sinwv-4(.i erely, � // Richard G. Ward X15 Chairman Ae LAW OFFICES A6 MARS. SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11788-5020 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 510 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON PAX(516)238.1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER GLENN B. CRUDER November 30, 1995 Ms. Melissa Spiro Planning Board F)APT Town of Southold 53095 Main Street P.O. Box 1179Southold, NiN NY 11971Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 367 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms. Spiro: As I indicated to you over the telephone, and as I am sure you are already aware, the Village of Greenport has declared a moratorium on approval of all applications for water useage. A copy of the Village's resolution dated July 20, 1995 is enclosed. This moratorium was imposed shortly after the Southold Planning Board granted us another extension of preliminary approval. The additional extension had been granted to allow us to pursue obtaining public water for the subdivision. The Village's moratorium completely frustrates that effort since they will not even discuss the matter. We have been in contact with Suffolk County Department of Health Services as to use of private wells and we, along with other developers, are attempting to work out a procedure for obtaining that permission. At this point the Department of Health Services has not even agreed on how we can apply for such permission. Based on all of the above, we would respectfully request that Southold Planning Board grant another extension of preliminary approval which would run to some date after the Village of Greenport moratorium ends. We are very appreciative of the Planning Board's granting the extensions it has and realize that we are probably becoming somewhat of a nuisance. However, we really have no choice. As you are aware, the Planning Board recently approved our bond figures and we have been taking all the steps necessary in terms of the Town so that we have, I believe, come down to one issue which as we are repeatedly indicating we have no real control over. If the Board would like either me or our engineer or both to address this matter at a meeting of the Board regarding this request or any other aspect of this matter, please let me know. Our current extension expires on December 14, 1995. Thank you for your courtesies in this matter. Cordially, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 2JC.,K.. Donald A. Rettaliata DAR:ms Enclousures cc: Thomas Wolpert, PE Francis O'Malley, MD VTL.AGE OF GREPNPORT BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING - JULY 20, 1995 ACTION TAKEN BY THE VILLAGE OF GREENPORT HOARD OF TRUSTEES: At the Regular Meeting of the Village of'Greenport Board of Trustees held on July 20, 1995 a motion made by Trustee Barbara E. Heaney, seconded by Trustee John A. Costello to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the incorporated village of Greenport upon study and analysis recognize the necessity for an adequate water supply to its residents and those consumers in its franchise area; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the incorporated Village o° Greenport are committed to improve the existing water auPPly system through the expenditure of substantial funds; and WHEREAS, the expenditure of such funds is intended to insure the residents of the Village of Greenport, current customers and those under valid contracts for service an adequate water supply; and WHEREAS, further study and analysis must be accomplished to determine the ability and feasibility of the Village of Greenport to supply an adequate water supply to any additional major subdivisions proposed within its existing franchise area, and now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Village of Greenport hereby imposes a moratorium on all now applications of major subdivisions as same are defined in Public Health Law Section 1115 of the State of New York for the hook up of water and sewer services for a period of twelve (12) months pending the completion of a comprehensive study to determine the ability and feasibility of further expansion of the Village of Greenport water supply system. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mayor David E. Kapell Yes Trustee George W. Hubbard Yes Trustee William J. Mills, III Yes Trustee Barbara E. Heaney Yes Trustee John A. Costello Yes Motion carried. rrwwrwwx+rwwwawwrrrrwrrw CERTIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) COLMY OF SUFFOLK THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I Lorna M. Catus, Clerk/Treasurer of the Village of Greenport, New York, County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing copy of the resolution now on file in this office, which was adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Greenport of said county on Julv 20, 1995, and that the same is a true and correct transcript of said resolution and of the whole thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the official seal of the Village of Greenport of the County of Suffolk. aC July 21, 1995 eozz ?'f /�! Dated Lo na M. Catus, i age Clerk/Treasurer SEAL i o�OgOFFOL/(C dUDP1'H T.TERRY C� OGy.� Town Hall,53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK y Z P.O.Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS Southold,New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER �,f, `� Fax(516)765-1823 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER ��.( `t.�O Telephone(516)765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 30, 1995: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby approves the amount of $345,425.00 for a bond for roads and improvements in the major subdivision of Bayberry Estates at Southold, all in accordance with the approval of the Southold Town Planning Board and Engineering Inspector James A. Richter. Judith T. Ter Southold Town Clerk October 31, 1995 1 igs D tibia-r; 1!�1 iOWN �OgUfFO(,�Co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS =yam Gy Richard G. Ward, Chairman y 2 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ^+ P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. �j. `� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��,� .�a� Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 24, 1995 Judith Terry, Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms. Terry: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 23, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated July 21, 1995, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $345,425.00, with an administration fee in the amount of $20,725.50. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Siql��Ze cerely, </ Richard G. Ward ""If Chairman enc. o�OgUfFO(,�co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G. Ward, Chairman w Z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �, `� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald ��l �aO. Fax (516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 24, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 23, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED to adopt the bond estimate dated July 21, 1995, and to recommend same to the Town Board. The bond estimate is in the amount of $345,425.00, with an administration fee in the amount of $20,725.50. Please contact this office if'you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, �s Richard G. Ward Chairman enc. • v co,�F��Gti- - • M- R.R�Yti10 NI) L J�GOBS � �` S.4zcss 1. _ RI Gv-=Z R. J s -? r-lvnasz. ,,,, • _�, =�ictaz_ac:w ;asap^.oa SCG:_CLI 'C'FY :.:Gr NA', Oc?ad-YE:IT ^O�, Ocr IC� Or^ TY_�, E�iGI Vc..R TO+N OP SOL��30 LJ BOND ESTIMATEr - 7 FOR inl n 3AY3ERRY ESTATES AT SOUTHOLD , TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ! �''�, T SCTM # : '_000-55-0c-35 & 36 L" I 0 iJ & 1000-76-01-til SOUTHOLD TOWN 4 JULY 21 , 19 9 5 PLANNING BOARD :TEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT ?RICE AMOUNT _ . 3 . 2 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING 5 2 , 500 . 00 8 8 , 000 . 00 5 , 200 C . Y . ROUGH GRADING UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 4 . 00 20 , 800 . 00 5 , 300 S . Y . FINE GRADE 1 . 50 9 , :50 . 00 DRA=:TAG^ 4 . 9 EACH CATCH BASINS ^ , 000 . 00 18 , 000 . 00 1 EACH BUBBLE BASIN - 10 ' Dia . 2 , 500 . 00 2 , 500 . 00 6 . 3 EACH MANHOLES 2 , 000 . 00 6 , 000 . 00 7 . 245 L . _ . 13" Dia . CMP 25 . 00 31 , 125 . 00 8 . j 200 L . F . 21" Dia. CMP 30 . 100 6 , 000 . 00 9 . 1 EACH CMP END SECTION -21" Dia . - , 500 . 00 1 500 . 00 10 . 3 , 400 L . T . CONCRETE CURBING 10 . 00 34 , 000 . 00 "_ . 10 . 000 C . Y . EXCAVATION & GRA.DIPTG RECHARGE BASIN 2 . 00 20 , 000 . 00 SURFACING: 12 . 700 C . Y . BASE COURSE ( 4" Stone 31end ) 40 . 00 28 , 000 . 00 13 . 875 TONS 3INDER ASPHALT ( 2 1/2" ) 40 . 00 35 , 000 . 00 14 . 525 TONS WEARING ASPHALT ( 1 1/2" ) 40 . 00 21 , 000 . 00 15 . 750 L . F . CHAIN LINK FENCING 25 . 00 18 , 750 . 00 15 . 300 S . Y . DRIVETaAY APRONS 40 . 00 12 , 000 . 00 17 . 80 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 16 , 000 . 00 18 . JOB SCREEN PLANTING - 7 , 500 . 00 19 . 22 EACH CONCRETE MONUMENTS 100 . 00 2 , 200 . 00 20 . 9 , 100 S . Y . TOPSOIL & SEED 2 . 00 13 , 200 . 00 21 . 1 EACH FIRE WELL _- , 000 . 00 15 , 000 . 00 22 . 5 EACH STREET LIGHTS 21 , 000 . 00 10 , 000 . 00 23 . - E.._H STREET SIGNS 200 . :00 100 . 00 c= . JC3� MA_NTENANCE & ?OOTECT101N '� TR - 000 SUB ,TOT`. o',� =DuI`i_STR?.^_�N RAYMOND L . J ACOH S a { -TAMES A . R I CHTE R , R . A . SUPERINTE.WENT.. SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT O`' ENGINEERING INSPECTOR FaX (516)-765-1750 w1 [ ��! (516)-765-7070 O F F I C E O F -r E NG I NE E R TONIN OP 80L1'1'HOLD BOND ESTIMATE -FOR L �� BAYBERRY ESTATES D �� AT SOUTHOLD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 6 095 SCTM #: 1000-55-06-35 & 36 & 1000-56-01-01 SaJTNOLD TOWN JULY 21 ,1995 PUINNING BOARD ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 . 3 . 2 ACRE CLEARING & GRUBBING $ 2 , 500 . 00 $ 8 , 000 . 00 2 . 5 , 200 C.Y. ROUGH GRADING UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION 4 . 00 20 ,800 . 00 3 . 6 , 300 S. Y. FINE GRADE 1 . 50 9 , 450 . 00 DRAINAGE : 4 . 9 EACH CATCH BASINS 2 , 000 . 00 18, 000 . 00 5 . 1 EACH BUBBLE BASIN -10 ' Dia. 2 , 500 . 00 2 , 500 . 00 6 . 3 EACH MANHOLES 2 ,000 . 00 6 ,000 . 00 7 . 1 ,245 L . F. 18" Dia. CMP 25 . 00 31 , 125 . 00 8 . 200 L . F. 24" Dia. CMP 30 . 00 6 ,000 . 00 9 . 1 EACH CMP END SECTION -24" Dia. 1 , 500 . 00 1 , 500 . 00 10 . 3 , 400 L . F . CONCRETE CURBING 10 . 00 34,000 . 00 11 . 10 . 000 C.Y . EXCAVATION & GRADING RECHARGE BASIN 2 . 00 20 ,000 . 00 SURFACING: 12 . 700 C. Y . BASE COURSE ( 4" Stone Blend) 40 . 00 28 ,000 . 00 13 . 875 TONS BINDER ASPHALT ( 2 1/2" ) 40 . 00 35 , 000 . 00 14 . 525 TONS WEARING ASPHALT ( 1 1/211 ) 40 . 00 21 ,000 . 00 15 . 750 L . F . CHAIN LINK FENCING 25. 00 18 , 750 . 00 16 . 300 S. Y . DRIVEWAY APRONS 40 . 00 12 , 000 . 00 17 . 80 EACH STREET TREES 200 . 00 16 , 000 . 00 18 . JOB SCREEN PLANTING - 7 , 500 . 00 19 . 22 EACH CONCRETE MONUMENTS 100 . 00 2 ,200 . 00 20 . 9 , 100 S .Y. TOPSOIL & SEED 2 . 00 18, 200 . 00 21 . 1 EACH FIRE WELL 15 , 000 . 00 15 ,000 . 00 22 . 5 EACH STREET LIGHTS 2 ,000 . 00 10 ,000 . 00 23 . 7 EACH STREET SIGNS 200 . 00 1 , 400. 00 24 . JOB MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC - 3 ,000 . 00 SUB TOTAL = $ 345,425 . 00 + 6% ADMINISTRATION FEE _ $ 2.0 , 725 . 50 TOTAL = $ 366 , 150 . 50 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS =�o��SUFFO(� cOGy Richard G. Ward, Chairman y = Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. 0 �++ P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. 1. �� Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald �Ql �a0 Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 13, 1995 Donald Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788-5620 Re: Major subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, June 12, 1995. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a six month extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1995 to December 14, 1995. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. This additional extension has been granted to allow you to pursue obtaining public water for the subdivision. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Xtvwfe� Richard G. Ward Chairman • • ,Sum Mq5 LAW OFFICES P16 MARS. SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE. MY. 11788.6880 FREDERICK M.MARS � Of COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 619 232.1717 -ALTER MACLYN CONLON Y•s a.01 R04 Il sr RAYMOND O. PERINI DONALD A RETTALIATA MAUREEN S. HOEROER GLENN S. GRUDER June 5, 1995 Ms . Melissa Spiro Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Ms . Spiro: As I indicated to you over the telephone earlier today, the village of Greenport still indicates that it cannot provide public water to the above-referenced project. A copy of their December 6, 1994 letter to our engineer is attached. Their continued inability to provide public water was confirmed in a telephone conversation to them earlier today . Both our engineer and myself have discussed this matter with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services in order to see if there was some method by which we could provide private wells at this time while installing the necessary water lines which could then be hooked up at the time public water is available. It was very strongly indicated to us by the Department of Health Services that their studies show that Greenport Water has sufficient good water in the ground which they can make use of provided they install the necessary wells . A copy of their denial form accompanies this letter. Apparently, the Village of Greenport is not willing to expend the necessary funds. A copy of the cost estimate of various improvements as calculated by the firm of Young & Young has been submitted to you. As previously indicated, we are prepared to submit the necessary covenants and restrictions signed by the property owners at any time. Io JJN 51996 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Ms . Meslissa Spiro June 5 , 1995 Page 2 We would appreciate your discussing this letter with the members of the Planning Board since our latest extension expires on June 14 , 1995 . We are completely frustrated by the lack of act'on by the Village of Greenport and are strongly considering Litigation against them which might resolve the issue once and for all as to not only our subdivision, but as to others who must be .in similar circumstances . Based on all of the above and prior correspondence, we would ask the indulgence of the Planning Board to grant us an additional six month extension of our preliminary approval . Please let me know the Planning Board' s feelings as to this matter and if' they are inclined not to grant an additional extension if i might address them at a public meeting prior to June 14 , 1995 . Thank you for your courtesies in this matter. Cordially, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON DAR�� Donald A. Rettaliata Enclosures cc: Thomas C . Wolpert, PE *Vilzatfe 01 1IL911eefl�1A OerS ORATRO Iwo NEW MCORPOR�TON APAu L>,tt DLSTRICTSUPRRINTENDENT OF UTILITIES MAYOR A&INCORPORAIMM UNOIR OENISAL LAW MAY 21,1114 JOHN I."JACK"BECHT DAVID E.KAPELL •Ii. d • r „ ,,,.., ,,. A ASSISTANT SUPI;RINTfNUENT•ELECTRIC /� SP1M.�,.,0 � AR7}IUR I.APICC•LLO TRUSTEES J� J N O I LA N.. JOHN A.COSTELLO t' r rw. ,. UTCLITY OFFICE GEORGE W,HUBBARD (516)477.1746 •'•""• w•1 Fu IS 16)477-1707 WILLIAM J.MILLS III 236 THIRD STREAT ROBERT E WIUTE,SR. ORUNPORT.NEW YORX 11944 POWER PLANT (516)477-0172 December 6, 1994 Mr . Thomas C. Wolpert , P.E. Young & Young Planning, Engineering & Land Surveying 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/0 Southold, New York H .S. Ref . No. : 92-038 Dear Mr. Wolpert : We can not provide you with public water to the above referenced project . Very t lx yours , ohn C Becht Superintendent of Utilities JJB: fka wp. 12 . 94 cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Valerie Marvin, Village Attorney DEG 8 1994 +RMS SLOANE dL Q4KQ t Over 100 Years of Community Service WWM-026 (Rev. 3/94 ) . .,._ . SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES •-- • .�ti: -•••--• OFFICE OF WATER AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SUFFOLi: COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK -11901 NOTIaCE OF ,N9pJ7-C0NFOP,MANCB - REALTY 3 IVIw'f,TQji OR DEVBL/lOpI�NTL ,L',��.• TO; d A / DATE : '2 �� f SUB. NAMF, : v '/ �rTf_V n`-- L 70 0 ep r GMZ: '7r- REF. NO. Rl V.� _ /f �J/ 11P1 20NING: TOWf1: / 12 40 This application is not being processed for approval because .it dors not conform with the requirements of Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. This Code requires that a realty subdivision or development comply with the following as marked: [ ) parcels to be served by public water and individual sewerage systems must have minimum lot areas of 20, 000 square feet or equivalent yield, Section 760-605, Paragraphs A. 3 . and B. 1 . , or Section 760-607, Paragraphs A. 2 . and P.. 2 . ] parcels to be served by private wells and individual sewerage systems must have minimum lot areas of 40, 000 square feet, Section 760-606, Paragraphs A. 5 . and C. 1 . [ J parcels to be served by individual sewerage systems must have minimum lot areas of 40, 000 square feet or equivalent yield, .Section 760-605, Paragraphs A. 4 . and B.2 . , or Section 760-607, Paragraphs Ail . and B. I . [ ) a commi.utity sewerage system method of sewage disposal is required when subsoil. or groundwater conditions are not conducive to the proper functior:ing of individual sewage systems, Section 760-605, Paragraph A.. 2 . j a community water system method of water supply is required when the realty subdivision or development is located within, or is reasonably accessible to, an existing water district or service area, Section 760-606, Parar[raphs A. 1 and A. 2 . [ j a conununity water system method of water supply is required when the groundwaters in the area are nen-potable, or potentially hazardous, Section 760-605, Paragraph [J(j Other/Comments : Walt"t" 2. > / `ob l Ste^' a XX iCe c.�+-', c.�+ e," -E' : ,:r cam.-.....,.�' For recd sideration, proof should be submitted that this project conforms with, or is.; s::empt from, these requirements of Article 6 of the Suffolk- County Sanitary Code . I, this matter cannot be resolved, you may request a variance from these standards by applying to the Depart.ment.lz Board of Review Genz..... .._t Prior to applying to the Board of Review, the subdivision/developmp?nt application nivat be commple�t..e . - -cam ' v". ,1 cc: 1-770 �� ft�� Reviewer //a��Vzp— Al'y 1e-1274..4/94 ��gUFFO(,�co PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman y x Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 • `F Southold, New York 11971 Bennett Mark S. McDonald y�0( �`a0! Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A-L, 23, 1995 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: Eo-kes Tax Map No.: 1000-,5S-'L-3S 45f. "J 5s- I- I Street Location: Wes%- side e� L,urJ Aor , 140' Soutl+ of V,.n nr u7/ Hamlet Location: s,^614 Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated X Other -6-k\ Es+,M�le it<h spill. (Dated s / its / 9.5 ) Sketch Site Plan (Dated / / ) Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated CommentS--3jjews, rc,,,ew Grob es+ ww�2 . Contact person: MJssa :ao YOUNG&YOUNG �B Planning, Engineering&Lend Surveying 400 Ostrander Avenue Tab*m(518)727-2209 Riverhead, New York 11901 raddk+(518) 727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNO,Lad Sw#aw THOMAS C.WOLPERT,Pmkumnl Engna KENNETH r.ARRUZZO,Lkd Sonva JOHN SCHNURR,L.dS May 18, 1995 ATTN: Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Construction Cost Estimate prepared for Bayberry Estates, for your use. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/nas Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. + Encl. 22 RD*Pant Osie. 125 Rano 25A,Radv Paan,Nw Yak 11778 Teo wn(516)744-2055 Rwe*ar LEE LUT7,Swops,P.C. May 18, 1995 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/O Southold, New York ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. &UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 CLEARING &GRUBBING 3.2 ACRES $2,000.00 $ 6,400.00 2 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 5,200 C.Y. 2.00 10,400.00 GRADING-ROADS 3 FINE GRADING 5,100 S.Y. 1.50 7,650.00 4 4"STONE BLEND OR 570 C.Y. 30.00 17,100.00 CONCRETE BLEND 5 4"ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1,200 TONS 60.00 72,000.00 6 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 10,000 C.Y. 2.00 20,000.00 GRADING- RECHARGE AREA 7 CHAIN LINK FENCING 750 L.F. 10.00 7,500.00 8 SCREEN PLANTING LUMP SUM 7,500.00 7,500.00 9 MOUNTABLE CONCRETE 3,400 L.F. 10.00 34,000.00 CURB 10 18" DIA. CMP 1,245 L.F. 20.00 24,900.00 11 24" DIA. CMP 200 L.F. 25.00 5,000.00 12 24" DIA. CMP END SECTION 1 EACH 1,500.00 1,500.00 WITH RIP RAP 13 10' DIA. LEACHING POOL 1 EACH 2,000.00 2,000.00 (BUBBLE BASIN) 14 CATCH BASINS 9 EACH 1,500.00 13,500.00 15 DRAINAGE MANHOLES 3 EACH 1,500.00 4,500.00 16 DRIVEWAY APRONS 150 S.Y. 25.00 3,750.00 17 TOPSOIL&SEED 9,100 S.Y. 2.00 18,200.00 18 STREET TREES 40 EACH 150.00 6,000.00 19 CONCRETE MONUMENTS 22 EACH 100.00 2,200.00 TOTAL $264,100.00 " Underground Utilities Not Included itf5 YOUNG&YOUNG �6 Planning,Eng)neering&lend Surveying 400 O*andet Avenue Tolopwno(518)727-2909 Rivetheed, New York 11901 ramnMla(518) 727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG,Lor l Swvager THOILIl4 C.WOLPERT,Prsrndonol Engnwr KENNETH U.ARRUZZO,land Sutvagar 10NNSCHHURR,Load smvagor May 18, 1995 ATTN: Melissa Spiro Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Ms. Spiro: Enclosed herewith is a copy of the Construction Cost Estimate prepared for Bayberry Estates, for your use. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/nas Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. + Encl. Rally Pant Olga@ 125 Route 25A,Radiy Point,Ow Yak 1177T ToWwoo 1516)744-2055 Ro"N IEE LUTZ,Suivegm,P.C. May 18, 1995 CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Bayberry Estates at Southold, T/0 Southold, New York ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. & UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 CLEARING &GRUBBING 3.2 ACRES $2,000.00 $ 6,400.00 2 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 5,200 C.Y. 2.00 10,400.00 GRADING -ROADS 3 FINE GRADING 5,100 S.Y. 1.50 7,650.00 4 4" STONE BLEND OR 570 C.Y. 30.00 17,100.00 CONCRETE BLEND 5 4"ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1,200 TONS 60.00 72,000.00 6 EXCAV., BACKFILL& 10,000 C.Y. 2.00 20,000.00 GRADING- RECHARGE AREA 7 CHAIN LINK FENCING 750 L.F. 10.00 7,500.00 8 SCREEN PLANTING LUMP SUM 7,500.00 7,500.00 9 MOUNTABLE CONCRETE 3,400 L.F. 10.00 34,000.00 CURB 10 18"DIA. CMP 1,245 L.F. 20.00 24,900.00 11 24"DIA. CMP 200 L.F. 25.00 5,000.00 12 24" DIA.CMP END SECTION 1 EACH 1,500.00 1,500.00 WITH RIP RAP 13 10'DIA. LEACHING POOL 1 EACH 2,000.00 2,000.00 (BUBBLE BASIN) 14 CATCH BASINS 9 EACH 1,500.00 13,500.00 15 DRAINAGE MANHOLES 3 EACH 1,500.00 4,500.00 16 DRIVEWAY APRONS 150 S.Y. 25.00 3,750.00 17 TOPSOIL&SEED 1 9,100 S.Y. 2.00 18,200.00 18 STREET TREES 40 EACH 150.00 6,000.00 19 CONCRETE MONUMENTS 22 EACH 100.00 21200.00 TOTAL $264,100.00 * Underground Utilities Not Included PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS c>� Richard G.Ward, Chairman r Z Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. ,' „w a �+ Southold, New York 11971 a ,a,; Mark S. McDonald ✓'��^, .;�° _ Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards +�. ' _ Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 10, 1995 Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. 1770 Motor Highway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Major Subdivsion for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 9, 1995: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of preliminary approval from December 14, 1994 to June 14, 1995. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Richard G. Ward AfS Chairman cc: John Becht, Greenport Public Utilities • • Psi A6 LAW OPPICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 816 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON 1.(516)809-1141 RAYMOND G.PERINI QONALD A.RCTTAUATA MAUREEN S.NOERGER GLENN S.GRUDER December 9, 1994 Mr. John J. Becht Re: Bayberry Estates Superintendent of Utilities at Southold, Village of Greenport T/O Southold, NY 236 Third Street H.S.Ref. No. : 92-038 Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Mr. Becht: The Greenport Water District Board adopted a resolution on June 22, 1987 to add the above subdivision on its lists of projects. By your letter to Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. dated December 6, 1994, you have now indicated that you cannot provide public water to the above referenced project. I would appreciate your sending me a list of all projects for which you have indicated public water is available since June 22, 1987 and the date on which the Greenport Water District Board added that project to its list. We have been diligently seeking public water since 1987 and have complied with all requests from the Village. It would appear to me that the Village's determination is discriminatory, but before reaching that conclusion, I want to give you the opportunity to demonstrate that all the projects that have been approved for water since June 22, 1987 were projects that predate ours. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata cc: Valerie Marvin, Esq. , Village Attorney Melissa Spiro, Town of Southold Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. O DEC 13 1994 i 00AMM Wage of }gmeaWoomporf 0 k1w9911r1 +rw 444 1)WRICTJ1U►9RIN MAYOR R4NG fdw T 7,1 MTgr wN/11 OL LAN uw1uY[3.1444 TIWDBN'OP MUM L KAP6Li, A JOIN J.'JACK'ISCHT .... ...:.� ..W.. .' AWLTAN'EUPERINTRND11NT.RLBCTRIC MUtPia9 - , 1 Aklwut 1.AP10EL.1.0 6�b , ISLAP{ O JOHN A.COf1ELLQ iRILITY OFFICE 08011011 W.NU811ARD (316)[77.1741 wuLaAM t.Maas mf � � w•� F"(310477.1707 OR RORRRT&WNfM ER 2341 11D 8i8Wr MFORT.NEW YORK 11944 POWAR PLAN' (316,Ott-0171 1 December 6, 1994 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert, P.R. Young i Young Planning, Rngineering i Land Surveying 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 R11 Bayberry ltstates at Southold, T/0 Southold, New York 44.8. Ref. No. t 92-038 , Dear Mr. Wolpert: We can not provide you with public Nater to the above referenced project. Very lx yours, ohn J. Seoht ; Superintendent of Utilities Mifka wp,12 . 94 act Donald A. Rettaliata, 8sg, Valerie Marvin, Village Attorney ', 1191 k, DEC 81994 Ovor 100 Yoara o1 Community Servlce ` c a..rr.u•.... ..�. —END— S4/> LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 516 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON F.(nye)ene-1>G> RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER GLENN B.GRUDER December 5, 1994 rDEG9 ) Southold Town Planning Board PLANNING BO RD 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: We are the attorneys for the owners of the property involved in the above major subdivision application. Preliminary approval for the subdivision has been granted and extensions of that preliminary approval have been granted by the Planning Board. The latest six- month extension expires December 14, 1994 . We are respectfully requesting an additional extension of time to furnish you with the required items. The need for this extension is occasioned by the fact that we are still unable to obtain a water availability letter from the Village of Greenport despite numerous attempts to do so that go back several years. Apparently, there have been several changes in personnel at that agency which is a cause for their delays. Without going into a complete history of our attempts to obtain a water availability letter, I shall only indicate that we originally made application just slightly after we made our original application to the Town of Southold Planning Board. They have apparently cancelled lists based upon dates of application and have lost applications submitted to them. Our most recent resubmission to them was on January 21, 1994 . That was by no means the original application and to date we have not received any determination on our application. In response to attempts to obtain a response to this reapplication, we were told that they could not find the application. The application was finally rediscovered and attempts have been made on an almost weekly basis to obtain the water availability letter. Although a recent change in the superintendent's position appears to have resulted in more expedited review, and despite continued promises, we still have Town of Southold Planning Board December 5, 1994 Page 2 been unable to obtain a water availability letter. Without the water availability letter, we are unable to obtain Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval of the final map. We obtained approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review and recorded necessary covenants and restrictions in the Suffolk County Clerk's Office April 19, 1994 . Since that date we have been unable to do anything further to finalize Suffolk County Department of Health Services requirements because of the lack of the water availability letter. We have intended to submit all open items to the Southold Planning Board at one time and currently have in our possession ready for submission to the Planning Board the following items: 1. Draft of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision. 2 . Draft of the By-Laws for the homeowners association. 3 . Draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. 4. Letter from each public utility company whose facilities are proposed to be installed. We have the final subdivision map prepared and the final drainage and road profiles, but again, have not been able to submit the final subdivision maps to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services because of the lack of a valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. We respectfully submit that we have done everything within our power to make the final submission, but have been thwarted in our efforts to do so by the Village of Greenport. If the Board would want us to submit all of the other documentation other than the final map without the Suffolk County Health Department stamp, we are prepared to so. We would respectfully request an additional extension of time to finalize the map. If the Board does not feel that it is appropriate to grant an additional six-month extension of the preliminary approval, we would appreciate such shorter additional time as it would determine appropriate. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, MARS, SIOANE & COONLON E )r,jLJ &A � DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata cc: Young and Young • 4 PA BL E WON �44_S AVAILABILITY OF CABLE_TV_. FACILITIES TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 FROM: CABLEVISION OF RIVERHEAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 201 OLD COUNTRY ROAD RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 SUBDIVISION NAME: LOCATION: DEAR BOARD MEMBERS: WE HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAT. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT WE WILL INSTALL CABLE TV FACILITIES TO THE LOTS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT. [ ) THERE ARE EXISTING CABLE FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WHICH WILL SERVE ALL PROPOSED LOTS. DQ THERE ARE EXISTING CABLE TV FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. NEW UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED. [ ) THERE ARE 110 EXISTING CABLE TV FACILITIES PASSING THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION. NEW UNDERGROUND FACILITIES WILL HAVE TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION FOR THE FU'T'URE PROVISION OF SERVICE TO ALL PROPOSED LOTS. Frank Snider Engineering Supervisor DATE: Cablevision of Long Island, East End Systell JD-029-L CABLEVISION Old Country Road, Riverhead, New York 11901 Rf (516) 727.6300 yd a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 3 Richard G.Ward, Chairman ^- Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. ?j "' , , P. O. Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765136 Kenneth L. Edwards ., - Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 13, 1994 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board and the Town Attorney have reviewed your letter in regard to forming a Homeowners Association for the roads, drainage areas and open space areas in the above mentioned subdivision. ( It is noted that you are pursuing dedication of the open space areas and such areas may not be included in the Homeowners Association. ) The Planning Board is not in favor of waiving the requirement for the Homeowners Association. Please note that the Town is not requiring that the Homeowners Association include a prospectus . I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter. Please call me if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, 1/'C ti -Melissa Spiro Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. P. O. Box 1179 Main MarkBenneS. McDonald �r..� . .; �� Southold, New York 11971 Mark th McDonald fr, Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Tele ���'-�--�„-r'� phone(516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 10, 1994 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, NY 11788 Re: Major Subdivision for Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 9, 1994: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant an additional six month extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1994 to December 14, 1994. Conditional preliminary approval was granted on December 14, 1992. Please note that this additional extension is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Q Richard G. Ward �,S Chairman • 0 r°6 LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON l 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 818 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON PAX(619)232-1747RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.NOERG ER GLENN S.GRUDER April 25, 1994 D Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman, Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN P.O. Box 1179 pU,NNING RD Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates, Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Ward: This letter is in furtherance of a meeting held recently with a member of your staff as to the various requirements to obtain the final subdivision approval as to the above subdivision. Specifically, it is our understanding that you require a homeowners association to be formed to manage the roads and drainage facilities until such time as they are dedicated to the Town of Southold. It is my understanding that the requirement for the homeowners association comes from a fear that the developer will fail to pay the taxes on the tax lot or lots including the roads and easement areas and that this will eventually lead to the sale of the property at auction with the final result that a buyer at the County auction will then petition the Town to be able to build a structure in some manner on the land purchased. In the first instance, we would point out that this will result in a severe financial and practical burden to the developer. In order to form a homeowners association, as I am sure you are aware, a filing must be made with the New York State Attorney General's Office. This filing includes an offering plan, and substantial backup information. This filing requirement is true even though the roads and drainage areas will ultimately be dedicated to the Town and the need for the homeowners association will cease and it can be dissolved. The cost of forming this homeowners association will ultimately run to approximately $15, 000 and this is so even 0 9 Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman April 25, 1994 Page 2 though the area and its uses will be reasonably small. As you are further aware, as to the specific subdivision involved in this instance, there will be substantial land to be left in a natural state. We have contacted both the Nature Conservancy and the Peconic Land Trust as to their accepting the land and they are both reviewing the matter further. We would also offer this land to the Town of Southold for any purposes they might have or its being left in its natural state by them. In writing this letter we are assuming that the land to be left in its natural state will be somehow resolved and that the only land to be put into the homeowners association ownership will be the roads and the drainage areas that will eventually be dedicated to the Town of Southold. The developer at the time of filing the map will be making a continuing and irrevocable offer of dedication of the roads and drainage areas to the Town of Southold. Language as to this continuing offer of dedication could be as follows: "The land shown on this map as roads, streets or highways, or for the widening thereof, and also easements, recharge basins, park areas and all other land indicated as dedicated for other public use are hereby irrevocably offered for dedication to the Town of Southold. The Town of Southold is in no way responsible for the maintenance of such roads, streets or highways or other public areas until the same have been accepted by the Town. " I am not sure of your exact practices but to further buttress this and make the Town secure, the actual dedication papers can be prepared and executed and delivered to the Town of Southold pending only their acceptance at some future date. The Town would be able to accept the land offered for dedication at any time including after some subsequent purchaser has acquired the property. Additionally, if the Town wanted to it could accept the dedication of the recharge basin at the earliest possible time since this is the only area a dwelling could be built. Also there is not any ordinance language requiring a minimum amount of assessed value as there is in the case of a highway dedication. It is my understanding that other Towns, such as Brookhaven, handle the potential for payment of nontaxes by putting an assessed value of zero dollars on the property since they consider it valueless because of the continuing and irrevocable offer of dedication which means that at any time the owner of the property could be divested of it and there is no absolutely no market value in selling it. In addition to the other language of the covenant and restrictions Mr. Richard G. Ward, Chairman April 25, 1994 Page 3 to be filed with the subdivision map, a covenant could be placed specifically on the roads and drainage areas that would prevent them from being used for any purposes other than those associated with roads such as utilities easements and the like. This would mean that any subsequent purchaser would be deemed to have knowledge of these recorded covenants and restrictions and could not in any way use the property in violation of them. I would also point out that the Town Ordinance language as to the requirement that there be $40,000 of assessed valuation per mile prior any highway being accepted for dedication. I do not know when that requirement was put in, but the effect of that in light of the current residential assessment rate (RAR) used by the Southold Assessor is that that there must be $1, 149, 425 of market value per mile. My understanding of the situation where the County obtains land for delinquent taxes is that the County offers the land to the appropriate town prior to auctioning it off. If the Town has any concerns, it could take the land from the County prior to sale. The developer will have a performance bond posted for construction of the road. He could also obtain bonding for maintenance of the road prior to dedication if that would cure the problem. We have been diligently pursuing our applications with the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the Village of Greenport as to sanitary and water issues. To date they have not been finally approved. Based on the need for more time in that regard and also as to resolving the matters as to the need for a homeowners association as well as working out a transfer to the Nature Conservancy, the Peconic Land Trust or some similar organization, we would respectfully request an additional extension of time to obtain final subdivision approval past the current deadline of June 14, 1994. We would also appreciate the opportunity to meet with the Planning Board or whomever you feel is appropriate to discuss this matter further. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON DAR:ms Donald A. Rettaliata cc: Howard Young r • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK& ✓yp ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERO. M.D.. M.P.H. January 10, 1(�994 COMMISSIONER Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloane and Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppuage,N. Y. 11788 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Subject: Board of Review Hearing -December 15, 1993 Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates#92-038,Town of Southold,SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1. Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise,your approval will._ be subject to unnecessary delay. Very truly yours, w1e%o, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM/Ir t� Enclosure cc: Board of Review File -Riverhead Ms. Susan D. Windesheim JAN 14 Mr. Frank Dowling,Sr. Planner Mr. Peter R.Akras, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board / DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ■ 225 RABRO DRIVE EAST. HAUPPAUGE.NY 11788-4290 0. TEL. 15161 833-3019 FAX 13161 833-2927 DE��P�� �yEAL';{ $Eyyr�cS SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERvflxFl�ArrvE DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,f Article 2, Section 760-220,Suffolk County Sanitary Codes 2 33 t9q To: Mary E. Hibberd,M.D.,M.P.H. Commissioner From: Dennis Moran,P.E. Chairman,Board of Review Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates,#92-038,Town of Southold, SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1. Applicant: Donald A.Rettaliata, Esq.,Mars,Sloane and Conlon, 1770 Motor Parkway, Hauppauge,New York 11788 Notice of Hearing: November 30, 1993 - Hearing Date: December 15, 1993 Statement of Problem A community type sewage system is required when subsoil and/or groundwater conditions are not conducive to the proper functioning of an on-site sanitary system in accordance with the requirements of Article 6,Section 760-605 (lb)of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 50 acre parcel into 18 lots ranging in size from 30,000 square feet to 36,000 square feet with a 33.9 acre open space parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone#IV. 3. Area is zoned R-80 residential. 4. Public water is available from the Greenport Water Supply. 5. Depth to groundwater is about 19 to 25 feet with perched water at 7 feet. 6. Soils are poor with clay materials. r . Mary E. Hibberd,M.D.,M.P.H. Page Two Subject: Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates#92-038, Town of Southold, SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36; 56-1-1. Findings and Facts (cont'd) 7. Distance to nearest public water supply wells is 6,000 feet to the west; groundwater flow is southerly. 8. Project meets density requirements. 9. Public sewers are not available. 10. Applicant provided Board with test hole information for each lot and an engineering design for the subsurface sanitary system for each lot. Where necessary, oversized sanitary system to be used. Certification of test holes data also provided. 11. The record of the hearing was held open to allow department staff to review the proposal. Staff made recommendation that the sanitary system for lots 14, 15 and 16 be oversized (3 - 8 foot diameter x 6 foot deep leaching pools). Determination It was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance provided the following conditions are met: • Poor soils shall be removed to achieve a hydraulic connection to acceptable soil strata to the satisfaction of the department; • Unsuitable soils must be removed and replaced with clean sand in the presence of a department representative; and •The sanitary leaching pools for lots 10 through 16 shall be oversized as per the direction of the department. Article 6 is intended to protect surface and groundwater qua.Lty by establishing limits on population density. Approval of the requested variance under the conditions sPecifred should not have any substantial adverse effect on water quality. %l (� 15y -�D Date Dennis Moran,P.E.,Chairman DM/1r COUNTY OF SUFFOLK C �� O� Nt5 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER November 30, 1993 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloane and Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Subdivision of Bayberry Estates #92-038, (T) Southold (SCTM 1000-55-6-35 and 36, 56-1-1) Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Your request to appear before the Board of Review of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services has been received. The review of this case has been scheduled for December 15, 1993 at 10 : 00 a.m. , in the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Conference Room, County Center, Room S-238, Riverhead. You and interested parties are requested to appear, with or without counsel, and you may produce any information or evidence concerning the above referenced property. Should you have any questions, please call 516-852-2100. Very truly yours, Dennis Moran, P.E. Chairman Board of Review DM:cah cc: Mr. James L. Corbin Mr. Richard Meyer Ms. Susan D. Windesheim Mr. Frank Dowling, Sr. Planner Mr. Peter R. Akras, P.E. Town of Southold Planning Board DN,51 W EWII NM[NTAL Ol1A4 WC 21993 COUNTY CENTER - RIVERHEAD.N.Y. I IIK)1-3307 862-2100 - d 'dtl "7 r - PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS r * SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Richard G.Wand.Chairman George Ritchie Latham.Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr. -- _ P.O.Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE rax(516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 16 , 1993 Kenneth Abruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Ave. Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abruzzo: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on November 15, 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant a retro-active one year extension of preliminary approval from June 14, 1993 to June 14, 1994. Please note that this is the last extension that the Planning Board will be granting. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Si cerely, i Richard G. Ward Chairman YOUNG & YOUNG PLANNING, ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11801 Telephone 518-727-2805 Facsimile 818-727-0144 BAND DELIVERED November 4 , 1993 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/0 Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Members of the Board: Would you kindly consider a re-approval of the subdivision map entitled "Preliminary Subdivision Map of Bayberry Estates" , dated October 22, 1992 . A copy of the December 14 , 1992 resolution is enclosed for your reference. Due to soil conditions, we have had to apply to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services Board of Review and that process has taken substantially longer than anyone could have anticipated. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanking you in advance, I am, Very truly yours, Kenneth F. Abruizzo tt S Enclsjt cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. NOV 519M -i , t UM0 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor &Land Surveyor DEC 23 '92 10: 13 41E',-�12i06 �oSufFoc,��o DEC ' r 1992 ��O Gym y at MARS .NE & CONLON ANNING BOARD MEMBERS c. 5M r L. HARRIS :nnett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ©�j. �� Supervisor George Ritchie Lalham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York I1u71 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 763-1823 necember 16, 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6--35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliat.a: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1992: it was RESOLVED to adopt the Lnginee.ring Inspector' s report dated December 9, 1992. At the meeting, Howard Young, your client' s surveyor, expressed concerns with certain aspects of the report. As a result, the Board adopted the .report subject to further review by the Planning Board, Engineering Inspector and Mr. Young. The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7 : 30 P.M. , was closed. It was further RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the maps dated October 22, 1992, for the major subdivision of Bayberry Estates subject to compliance with the Engineering Inspector' s report as stated above. Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the data of preliminary approval. shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a .request for an extension of time is requested and granted by the Planning Board. . Bayberry Estates December 16, 1992 Page 2 The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain an adequate amount of suitable land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2,000.00 per lot will be required in lieu of land reservation.— The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps containing a vlid stamp owill. Health Department approval (six (6) paper copies be required as part of the final submission . Two (2) mylars will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2 . Final drainage plans and road profiles . The drainage plans shall be revised in accordance with the revised Engineering Inspector' s report. (six (6) paper copies are ,required. ) 3 . A valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. q , A draft of the Declaration of covenants and 'Restrictions for the subdivision. The following terms and conditions shall apply to all land lying within the open Space areas shown on the map for Bayberry Estates: a. No structure or building 'shall be placed within the open space area. The terms "structure" and "building" shall be interpreted. as including: swimming pools, patios, garages, sheds and other storage buildings, structures for the housing of domesticated animals, the storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, and the placement of fences, retaining walls and bulkheads. b. No clearing of trees, disturbance of natural soils, or any other activity is permitted to occur, with the exception of the creation of foot trails for passive recreational activities, approved recharge basin constructions and supplemental planting of appropriate native or near native vegetation. C. The wetlands and wetlands buffer shall not be filled with soil, sand, brush or other debris. Any disturbance shall be redressed by the Bayberry Estates December 16, 1992 Page 3 restoration of said Land to its prior state within sixty (60) days of the disturbance or of the date the .disturbance was reported to either the Planning Board or the Bay Constable. d. The wetlands and. wetlands buffer area may be traversed by a walkway, whether elevated or on the ground, provided permits can be obtained from the applicable agencies, which may include the Southold Town Board of Trustees, and the New York state Department of . Envronmental Conservation. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. S. A draft of the By-laws for the Homeowners Association. This must: be established for the open space areas in addition to the roads, drainage and recharge area. 6 . A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 7 . A letter from each public utility company whose facilities are proposed to be installed in the proposed suhdivision. Such letter shall state that the utility company will make the installations necessary for the furnisbi.ng of its services. All utilities are to be underground. The final hearing will not be scheduled until all of the above items are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr." J Chairman Encl. cc: Gerald Hickson, Superintendent, Greenport Village Water Co. o��gUFFO(�-CO Gym cm PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS to SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy `� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 'j1Ql �a0 Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 23, 1993 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 22, 1993 : Be it RESOLVED to adopt the March 16, 1993 report from the Engineering Inspector. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, il 'G�j�✓�� Gf�tib'J" Richard G. Ward ryy5 Chairman Encl. �SUEFO(,��o ✓SuBFi� o �G ryS RAYMOND L. JACOBS to , JA.NES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF TEE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MARCH 16 , 1993 Richard G. ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall , 53095 Main Road Southold , New York 11971 Re: 7 BAYBERRY ESTATES - MAJOR SUBDIVISION LAUREL AVE. , SOUTHOLD SCTM: # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Ward: As per your request , I have reviewed the latest submission for the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in my last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner . I have reviewed this project and the proposed Recharge Basin with Mr . Jacobs . The waiver regarding the installation of fencing is acceptable if the necessary insurance, maintenance and ownership of the basin is to remain the responsibility of the Developer or a Homeowners Association. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. games cerely, cc : Raymond L. Jacobs A. Richter , R.A. (Superintendent of Highways ) n LAR I sot; Ice RAYMOND L. JACOBS tC=f+ T JAMES A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS 'r�Ql ��0INSPECTOR 763-3140 763-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MARCH 16 , 1993 Richard G. Ward Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall , 53095 Main Road Southold , New York 11971 Re: BAYBERRY ESTATES - MAJOR SUBDIVISION LAUREL AVE. , SOUTHOLD SCTM: # 1000-55-06-35 h 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Ward: As per your request, I have reviewed the latest submission for the above referenced subdivision. All of the items listed in my last report have been addressed in a satisfactory manner . I have reviewed this project and the proposed Recharge Basin with Mr . Jacobs. The waiver regarding the installation of fencing is acceptable if the necessary insurance, maintenance and ownership of the basin is to remain the responsibility of the Developer or a Homeowners Association. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact my office. 1 cerely, ames A. Richter , R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs ( Superintendent of Highways ) MAR � 7 Iq FG.. �UFFO(1f�o� �3 W i 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman "'A`°- Supervisor George Richie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S: McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 �G.bruary �-`� t James Richter, Road Inspector I Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: y �err'v �sE�Fes Tax Map No. : 100 - S5- (, - 35+ x6 a 56- I I Street Location: QIs La ,ry I Ave . Hamlet Location: Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision map (Dated Road Profiles (Dated Gradin and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated -----P-r-adincr and Drainage Plans (Dated Other (Dated / / J Comments: 1 1PaGP rru y y rc < CV\r\ s '7 ¢r . a QC'OL w le e, ink -tt,is w�11 be �QAulre� prior -to an wa:,xQ, Contact Person: M-!t,ss �q Y YOUNG & YOUNG � _ PLANNING, ENGINEERING&LAND SURVEYING S 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 Telephone 516-727-2909 Facsimile 618-727.0144 February 19, 1993 Melissa Spiro, Planner Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 r l till , Re: Bayberry Estates FEBFE$ 2 2 Laurel Lane Southold, New York SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD _t Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith are four (4) sets of the Preliminary Subdivision Map " Bayberry Estates" last dated February 18 , 1993 . This map has been amended pursuant to the comments of Mr. James A. Richter made by letter dated December 9, 1992 . In an effort to clarify our response, we shall number our responses using the comment numbers from Mr. Richter's letter dated December 9, 1992 . 1) The drainage calculations shown on the map are proper, indicating a weighted runoff coefficient of 25% over the entire tributary area. {from Southold Town Code Sec. A 108-26 B. " drainage areas shall be designed to provide storage based on an anticipated runoff from a six-inch rainfall in twenty-four (24) hours on the tributary area under conditions of total potential development multiplied by a weighted runoff coefficient [minimum twentyhundredths (0. 20) ] "} . Although we have indicated some additional detail the recharge area, providing storage of 54000 cubic feet has not been amended. 2) Additional test holes have been excavated and the results indi- cated on the map. The recharge area detail has been amended to indicate that it should be excavated to the existing sand layer shown by test holes number 6 and number 13 and backfilled to to elevation 12 . 0 with clean sand. Although the soils in the area indicate poor drainage, they have helped sustain a well established, unique, and productive wetlands system which should not be deprived of its water source. The drainage system shown will return the storm water runoff to the perched water wet- lands system assuring its continued success and productivity. ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMAS C.WOLPERT KENNETH F.ABRUZZO Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer Land Surveyor &Land Surveyor February 19, 1993 Page 2 2 a) The perched water condition on this site as it affects storm water runoff, storage and recharge has been analyzed. Certainly the perched water is moving on the clay layers throughout the site as indicated by the wetlands and ponds which are surface indications of the perched water. The recharge area, as designed, will allow for the proper storm water storage and, in the event of a storm exceeding the design parameters, will allow for safe overflow into the freshwater wetlands system. Hopefully, the storm water laden soils will promote the growth of wetlands plants which will enhance the recharge basin both in its storage/recharge capacities and in its water quality control. It would be wrong not to use the natural environmental features available at this site. 3) The required fencing of the Recharge Area should be waived as it will be detrimental to the aesthetic environment as well as the flora and fauna. 4) The plan has been amended to indicate an additional catch basin at station 7+54 Road A opposite catch basin number 5, but as it is so close to the high point of Road A (station 3+91) , we have not shown an additional catch basin at station 2+80 Road A opposite catch basin number 3 . 5) A "permanent" drainage easement has been indicated over lot 11. 6) The proposed bubble basin (the safe overflow for the drainage system) will discharge excess storm water into the open space but will not flood lot number 11 as surface waters move at right angles to the land contours. Note two spot elevations on the westerly portion of lot it are 20. 85 and 20.22 and note the large wetlands area has a surface elevation of approximately 17. 0. 7) Rip-rap has been indicated at the bubble basin and end section. 8) Although contrary to the Town Code, the road profiles have been prepared at an appropriate scale of 111= 50' horizontal and 1"=10' vertical. All good engineering text would indicate that a "balance between horizontal and vertical scale is necessary in order to portray the ground profile in a realistic manner" . Certainly the scales required by the Code would indicate a very distorted ground profile. 9) The Typical Road Section has been amended to indicate the proper 15 mountable curb, consistent with the Typical Mountable Curb Detail. February 19, 1993 Page 3 10) The plan has been amended to indicate a 44' curb radius at all turns-a-round. Should you, the Board, or Mr. Richter wish to discuss these matters further, we would be most pleased to make ourselves available at your convenience. Pursuant to the Resolution granting preliminary approval, we are proceeding with the final plat but wish to resolve the design and drainage concerns as soon as possible. Very truly yours, YY'Ozc7c�.� Howard W. Young HWYAOa Encl. cc: Donald Rettaliata, Esq. + 2 sets Mr. James A. Richter + 1 set Mr. Jeffery L.Seeman, R. E.M. + 1 set 1 { r' ti PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 16, 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 14, 1992: It was RESOLVED to adopt the Engineering Inspector' s report dated December 9, 1992 . At the meeting, Howard Young, your client' s surveyor, expressed concerns with certain aspects of the report. As a result, the Board adopted the report subject to further review by the Planning Board, Engineering Inspector and Mr. Young. The preliminary public hearing, which was held at 7 : 30 P.M. , was closed. It was further RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant preliminary approval on the maps dated October 22, 1992, for the major subdivision of Bayberry Estates subject to compliance with the Engineering Inspector' s report as stated above. Failure to submit the final submission within six ( 6) months of the date of preliminary approval shall automatically cancel the conditional preliminary approval, unless a request for an extension of time is requested and granted by the Planning Board. Bayberry Estates December 16, 1992 Page 2 The Planning Board has reviewed the property and has decided that the subject property does not contain an adequate amount of suitable land to fulfill the park and recreation requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. Therefore, a payment of $2, 000. 00 per lot will be required in lieu of land reservation. The final submission must contain the following: 1. Final subdivision maps containing a valid stamp of Health Department approval (Six ( 6) paper copies will be required as part of the final submission . Two ( 2) mylars will be required prior to any endorsement of the subdivision. ) 2 . Final drainage plans and road profiles. The drainage plans shall be revised in accordance with the revised Engineering Inspector' s report. (Six ( 6) paper copies are required. ) 3 . A valid water contract with the Village of Greenport. 4 . A draft of the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions for the subdivision. The following terms and conditions shall apply to all land lying within the Open Space areas shown on the map for Bayberry Estates: a. No structure or building shall be placed within the open space area. The terms "structure" and "building" shall be interpreted as including: swimming pools, patios, garages, sheds and other storage buildings, structures for the housing of domesticated animals, the storage of boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, and the placement of fences, retaining walls and bulkheads. b. No clearing of trees, disturbance of natural soils, or any other activity is permitted to occur, with the exception of the creation of foot trails for passive recreational activities, approved recharge basin constructions and supplemental planting of appropriate native or near native vegetation. C. The wetlands and wetlands buffer shall not be filled with soil, sand, brush or other debris. Any disturbance shall be redressed by the - Bayberry Estates December 16, 1992 Page 3 restoration of said land to its prior state within sixty (60) days of the disturbance or of the date the disturbance was reported to either the Planning Board or the Bay Constable. d. The wetlands and wetlands buffer area may be traversed by a walkway, whether elevated or on the ground, provided permits can be obtained from the applicable agencies, which may include the Southold Town Board of Trustees, and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The Planning Board may require additional covenants and restrictions upon review of the final maps. 5. A draft of the By-laws for the Homeowners Association. This must be established for the open space areas in addition to the roads, drainage and recharge area. 6 . A draft bond estimate for all subdivision improvements. The draft will be reviewed by the Planning Board and the Engineering Inspector. 7 . A letter from each public utility company whose facilities are proposed to be installed in the proposed subdivision. Such letter shall state that the utility company will make the installations necessary for the furnishing of its services. All utilities are to be underground. The final hearing will not be scheduled until all of the above items are submitted and are accepted by the Planning Board. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr."f Chairman Encl. cc: Gerald Hickson, Superintendent, Greenport Village Water Co. PPS RAYMOND L. JACOBS LnT SUPERINTENDENT OF JAMS A. RICHTER HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING O ��01 �� INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DECEMBER 9 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (MAJOR) LAUREL AVE. - SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Orlowski : As per your request , I have reviewed the preliminary maps and road profiles that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows : 1 . The drainage calculations did not provide a runoff coefficient of ( 1 . 0 ) for the proposed road surface area. By my calculations , this would increase the storage volume required from 49 , 000 C. F. to 70 , 000 C. F. Maintaining the proposed 1 : 6 slope and the 4 ' effective depth, the base of the proposed basin will require a minimum area of 12, 000 S . F. 2 . Test Hole # 6 is located in the bottom of the proposed recharge basin. This test hole only penetrates 4 feet below the design bottom of the basin. 5 feet is required by code. Additional test holes will be required in this area. The existing test hole indicates that loam & clay extends down to elevation 9 which is 3 feet below the design depth of the basin. It also indicates that a 1 foot layer of sand & gravel exists to elevation 8 . If the new test hole shows that the sand & gravel layer is deeper and is considered to be good drainage than the following will be required . All of the loam & clay material must be removed from the bottom of the basin. The basin will then need to be backfilled with clean sand and gravel to provide a minimum depth of clean material that extends 5 feet below the design depth of the basin. 2 . (a ) The New Test Hole required in item # 2 above may highlight other potential problems that could exist. The amount and levels of perched water that are indicated by the existing test holes as well as the depth of clay noted in test hole # 5 suggests that the above referenced excavation may cause infiltration of perched water into the proposed recharge basin. This will not be acceptable. Additional data will be required for further review of the proposed recharge basin. 3 . Fencing and Landscaping will be required at the Recharge Basin as indicated in sections A108-39 & A108-27 of the Town Code. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. DECEMBER 9 , 1992 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES PAGE 2 of 2 4. Two additional catch basins should be installed in Road "A" . The locations should be directly opposite to catch basins #3 & #5 to prevent water courses along the curb line from exceeding 3501 . 5. A temporary easement is shown for the Cul-de=Sac at the end of Road "A" . The drainage pipe extending between catch basin #7 and the proposed bubble basin is within the proposed temporary easement . This drainage pipe however, also encroaches on lot # 11 . If and when this temporary easement in removed , a drainage easement will still be required. If this is not possible, the location & direction of the pipe will need to be changed or modified so that it remains within the boundaries of road "A" and the open space. 6 . The proposed bubble basin discharges into the open area or buffer zone with an existing low level area at elevation 16 . The elevation 16 contour also extends into the proposed building area in lot # 11 . The proposed building area will need to be reduced or the lot will require regrading and/or backfilling to prevent stormwater runoff from discharging into private property. 7 le ,Basin and atpthe pPipe uEnd bSection llocated ded uin the Rechargend the d Basin. 8. The road profiles on sheet # 2 indicate a vertical scale of 1 " = 10 ' . The Town Code requires 1 " = 51 . 9 . Thcurb their dimensions. One ashows d15" and road rthe lother es ow a 1 shows 18% Please clarify. 10 . The minimum pavement radius at all Cul-de-Sac 's should be 44 ' . If you have any questions concerning this review, or if you need any additional information, please contact my office. S 'ncere Y� James A. Richter , R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs ( Superintendent of Highways ) File STATE OF 11,, .1 YORK) LEGAL N097CE Nonce of Public Hearing ) SS: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law,a public hearing will be held by C/'fa%f'I' CZ7AJkU of Mattituek, in the Southold Town Planning Board,at the Town Hall,Main Road,Southold, said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she New York in said Town on the 14th is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES,'a day of December 1992 on the quos- ' bast of the following: Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in 7:30 P.M. Preliminary draemrma- the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and tion for the major subdivision for Bayberry Eaton,at Southold in the State of New York, and that the Notice of which j Town of Southold,Courcy of Suffolk i and the State of New York.Suffolk the annexed is a printed copy, has been regular- County Tae Map Number 1000-55-6 1 published in said News once each week 35&36 and 1000-56-1-1. y p �� The property is bordered on the for J weeks successively, commencing on north bynow formerly of Yen- Ar d mss' g7 nccou Parkrk Property Owners Assoc. the day Of s(� 19_L�� "Park and Playground", by land now or formerly of Subdivision"Yetnecott �����rorr� Park",Suffolk Co. File No. 5187, �, �y�Yt71.tsNr" Lott 39.46; on the cast by Laurel �^"'P ',Side 01 No (O& Avenue; on the south by the Long lia►Mf Island Railroad;on the wear by land ,�`''aana,,,1„,,,l (r`gllty9mm � Principal Clerk now or formerly of Patricia Ann (Jtiiarr”' Mooney,by land now or formerly of E� vVncp --,_ -� Edwin Mooney,by land now or for- merly of Herbert R.Mandel,and by land now or formerly of Richard H. Sworn to before meWheeler&Laurccn E. Wheeler andy�� / _/by Lot 47 of the "Yennecott Park" day of JjCe4" 19 ^r subdivision. Any person desiring to be heard on ?.� the above matter should appear at the - ;� time and place specified. p Dated:November 25,1992 BY ORDER OF THE ._ SOU77{OLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Beencu Oaowski,Jr. Chairman 7575-ITD3 a COUNTY OP SUES -SLK ss SIAL L OINEW YORK LEGAL NOTICE Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she i; lir• Notice of Public Hearing Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAV ELER-WATCI I"I'1N, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk (,(,,;I EN that pursuant to Section 276 and that the notice of which the annexed is a printcd of the Town Law,a public hear- ha< been published in said Long Island I tvcicl wma . i,I II ing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the once each week for . . . . . _ . '' ' 1't Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said tiucessl cvely, Col In encinn g othe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Town on the 14th day of . . . . . December 1992,on the question of the following: 4�-� - day of . . 19 . 7:30 P.M. Preliminary deter- — - mination for the major subdivi- sion for Bayberry Estates, at ( . Southold in the Town of ----- Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York.Suf- folk County Tax Map Number 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and Sworn to before me Ihis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jay c( 1000-56-1-1. The property is bordered on - the north by land now or e c� . • 19 formerly of Yennecott Park Pro- perty Owners Assoc"Park and Playground," by land now or formerly of Subdivision "Yen- p necott Park,' Suffolk Co. File No.5187,Lots 39-46;on the east Notary Public by Laurel Avenue;on the south by the Long Island Railroad;on BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER the west by land now or former- NOTARY PUGLIC, State of Nem York ly of Patricia Ann Mooney, by No. 480&346 land now or formerly of Edwin Qualified in Suffolk County Mooney,by land now or former- Commission Expires 8/3i/qy ly of Herbert R.Mandel,and by land now or formerly of Richard H.Wheeler&Laureen E.Wheeler and by Lot 47 of the "Yennecott Park" subdivision. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should appear at the time and place above specified. Dated: November 25, 1992 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN - PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ' 1X-12/3/92(11) Falit ` P� RAYMOND L. JACOBS N ,zn JAMS A. RICHTER SUPERINTENDENT OF Q ENGINEERING HIGHWAYS ��rol ���� INSPECTOR 765-3140 765-3070 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD DECEMBER 9 , 1992 BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD TOWN HALL, 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (MAJOR) LAUREL AVE. - SOUTHOLD SCTM # 1000-55-06-35 & 36 # 1000-56-01-01 Dear Mr . Orlowski : As per your request , I have reviewed the preliminary maps and road profiles that were submitted for the above referenced subdivision. My comments are as follows: 1 . The drainage calculations did not provide a runoff coefficient of ( 1 . 0 ) for the proposed road surface area. By my calculations , this would increase the storage volume required from 49 , 000 C. F. to 70 , 000 C. F. Maintaining the proposed 1 : 6 slope and the 4 ' effective depth, the base of the proposed basin will require a minimum area of 12, 000 S . F. 2 . Test Hole # 6 is located in the bottom of the proposed recharge basin. This test hole only penetrates 4 feet below the design bottom of the basin. 5 feet is required by code. Additional test holes will be required in this area. The existing test hole indicates that loam & clay extends down to elevation 9 which is 3 feet below the design depth of the basin. It also indicates that a 1 foot layer of sand & gravel exists to elevation 8 . If the new test hole shows that the sand & gravel layer is deeper and is considered to be good drainage than the following will be required . All of the loam & clay material must be removed from the bottom of the basin. The basin will then need to be backfilled with clean sand and gravel to provide a minimum depth of clean material that extends 5 feet below the design depth of the basin. 2 . ( a ) The New Test Hole required in item # 2 above may highlight other potential problems that could exist . The amount and levels of perched water that are indicated by the existing test holes as well as the depth of clay noted in test hole # 5 suggests that the above referenced excavation may cause infiltration of perched water into the proposed recharge basin. This will not be acceptable. Additional data will be required for further review of the proposed recharge basin. 3 . Fencing and Landscaping will be required at the Recharge Basin as indicated in sections A108-39 & A108-27 of the Town Code. BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. DECEMBER 9 , 1992 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES PAGE 2 of 2 4. Two additional catch basins should be installed in Road "A" . The locations should be directly opposite to catch basins #3 & #5 to prevent water courses along the curb line from exceeding 350 ' . 5. A temporary easement is shown for the Cul-de-Sac at the end of Road "A" . The drainage pipe extending between catch basin #7 and the proposed bubble basin is within the proposed temporary easement. This drainage pipe however, also encroaches on lot # 11 . If and when this temporary easement in removed, a drainage easement will still be required. If this is not possible, the location & direction of the pipe will need to be changed or modified so that it remains within the boundaries of road "A" and the open space. 6 . The proposed bubble basin discharges into the open area or buffer zone with an existing low level area at elevation 16. The elevation 16 contour also extends into the proposed building area in lot # 11 . The proposed building area will need to be reduced or the lot will require regrading and/or backfilling to prevent stormwater runoff from discharging into private property. 7 . Rip-Rap should be provided around the Proposed Bubble Basin and at the Pipe End Section located in the Recharge Basin. 8 . The road profiles on sheet # 2 indicate a vertical scale of 1 " = 10 ' . The Town Code requires 1 " = 5 ' . 9 . The curb detail and road profiles show a discrepancy in their dimensions. one shows 15" and the other shows 18" . Please clarify. 10 . The minimum pavement radius at all Cul-de-Sac 's should be 44 ' . If you have any questions concerning this review, or if you need any additional information, please contact my office. S 'ncere James A. Richter , R.A. cc : Raymond L. Jacobs ( Superintendent of Highways ) File 6U.6 Fktle- • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK 6 (9 ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING ARTHUR H. KUNZ DIRECTOR OF PLANNING November 30, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11901 Preliminary Subdivision Map: Bayberry Estates Tax Map No. : 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 SCPD File No. : 1333-NJ-92-10 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that pursuant to Section A 14-24, Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code that the above captioned plat is not within the jurisdiction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission. Very truly yours, Arthur N. Kunz Director of Planning S/s Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division FD:mb OEC - 4 1992 PL H.LEE DENNISON BUILDING 0 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY 0 HAUPPAUGE. NEW YORK 11788 • (516) 853-5192 gl1FF01Ir � GG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ,ya. 4' T SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �.j. O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November 24, 1992 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM#1000-55-6-35, 36 & 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 23, 1992. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, December 14, 1992 at 7 : 30 P.M. for a preliminary public hearing on the maps dated October 22, 1992. Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Ars Chairman cc: Gerald Hickson, Greenport Water Utilities ��gUFFOI�-c • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W ,� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O� �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 0 .ate Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD II O Fax (516) 765-1823 ,CJe n PYL I , 19 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please find ( 2) surveys for eV4 rry E4,A c CCTM:ti-t000_55 4-35 3� arJ 400-s6 Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by /� �31992. Thank you for your _ cooperation. Very truly yours, B nnett Orlowski, J Chairman enc. w r ­3 y-A PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti Bennet[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS y O � �� - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Q �� Richard G. Ward �1 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLnD'' Fax (516) 765-1823 Suffolk County Planning Commision H. Lee Dennison Executive Office Building - 12th Floor Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Attention: Mr. Frank Dowling, Senior Planner Subdivision Review Division Gentlemen: Pursuant to Section A14-24, Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following proposed subdivision to the Suffolk County Planning Commission: Map of - 71 >aJLrrni �Sfu�Ps Hamlet/Localinnty 1r„ - ,��r `; S.C.D.P.W. Topo No. : Zoning _ S.C. Tax Map No. : OUp - S5 _ r. __ 7 —25+3 uc 56 t - I Major Sub. X— Minor Sub. Site Plan Cluster MATERIAL SUBMITTED: u�azl52 /9 Preliminary Plat ( 3 copies) )-a, Z Road Profiles (1) Drainage Plans (1) _Topogroaphical Map (1) Site Plan (1) _ Grading Plan (1) Other 'mteriials (specify and give number of copies) Q F 'T e Decjcw C'22� (`.g7�'Pc( it f l u (; S',F, ck&s Fla n, &Q:kJ 91 x-515(1 Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet CONTINUED REFERRAL CRITERIA: SEQRA STATUS: 1. The project is anUnlisted (Type I) (Type II)Action. 2. A (Negative Declaration (Positive Declaration) (Determ. of Non-Significance) has been adopted by the Planning Board. 3. E.I.S. statement enclosed. (Yes) No . 4. The proposed division has received approval from the S.C. Dept of Health. (Yes) Nom Comments: We request acknowledgement of receipt of this referral (Yes) NoD Referral received lg by Suffolk County Planning Commission and assigned File NO. Very truly �yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman l PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `� ` SCOTT L. HARRIS ' ^" Supervisor George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward �� = ;� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald s " P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very,��yours, Bennett Orlowski, Chairman � y � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O`' t ,: ' SCOTT L. HARRIS t riek.S""�' George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor_. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 MP.O. Box I Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN O OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 055 -Block 06 -Lots 35, 36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet Of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "R-80" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of approximately 33.9 acres of open space, or 68 percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, Perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land, water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Comndssioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees .Judith T. Terry,"Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 • �OgUFFO(�-c • o � Cm PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS % Z p SCOTT a HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ij.� ® O�� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box I Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 !V00e n,bel- 719��, James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for your review. Application Name: �3erry kS��es Tax Map No. : 1000Y35 6 35x36 1 56- 1- � Street Location: Hamlet Location: ,,7� I<1 Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Ma (Dated >l Preliminary Subdivision Final SMap (Dated ' /p ubdivision Ma X Road Profiles (Dated iv /22 /9!2 ) uracing and Dra>na a Plans (Dated Other Sketch Site Plan (Dated / P1e11mlnarV Site Plan (Dated / Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / " Other (Dated / / Comments: —Pj /V� < PC: Contact Person:AZ4 5SA I M1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS � Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � ;:'s� �•"' Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ;� _ti0- ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very/��urs."-,",�"'y"/� �t Bennett Orlowski, Jr. I/ ins Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS v i r Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O ?r �" SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ` Richard G. Ward '��'C yt ��'�.f'� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN O OLDOFFICE Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 is notice is issued rsuant to to Article 8 (State Environmental al Quality Review)rt 617, the of of the Environmental) Conservation ations ai pertaining The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000 -Section 055 - Block 06 -Lots 35,36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Pagel of 2 Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "R-80" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of approximately 33.9 acres of open space, or 68percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, Perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land, water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board _ Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees Judith T. Terry,"Town Clerk Page 2 of 2 _- r : ' ' �-:�,�• %//��• � � �®Gtr CRAMER, CCiATES ENVIRONMENTN it c,•/ �VG CONSULTANTS //! Cud November 12, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 d Re: Bayberry Estates NOV ! 3 !991 SC7'M # 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny; We are in receipt of y Olaf authorization to�roceed ', ith regi,-%v of the T,�n c E.�"Part 111,wit' regard to the above rsferenced project Vice I s ^.o.,t{,iCteta ,�1 t.uiial -NyIeR 3lld at this time find that there is or-e n a or cone rn -hlcn bels not oven avequat:iy addressed. This matter concerns %vZter resourCes ill the vicinity Of tho propsed south recharge basin and i.Gt 11 on the cluster p':a;1, The original review prepared by CVA: indicated the following: "The wet?ands is undcriin with Cana lice $ill loam,whict' rctaias siGniGr. nt moisture. The sol:sus vcy also indicates ilia; thcac are sevC"intermittent strcari; assor-';at;:d+xiih tl c;z wetlands. fnicr mittcnt streams are loeat(:d vithin the wetlands and in areas heto'.+'2C fent eir,•;=ti:,n is aFc.,vcstcrn aid nt,nh ecatral area of the sit;. These areas arc idcrtiticd as-not ei0s."Ibie without tii(:;.e" and"unciassirt d% inspection of the arca surrounding the site,fins exl;ting strcane crossings in the licinity of the 1ntCr5CChUn Cf tranrci Avcnuc and A? in Road (so•}t} c.f the siiei; nd „'Crc,Ps "not,a'rmo, noriti of the site. The pros ncc of I]owing surface water streams Werth and south of IF.c site,coupled with the poorly drained soils and intermittent streams identified in th; Soil Survey oa the s�e its:?F,strC„gly supgcsts a perched stream or some faidy extensive perched a atcr mndkion, b:y,),,.d the limits of designated wetlands depicicd on the map. Accordingly this snn;:id be coM,sidcred in the conte:.: of site use." The presence of eXtensive perch,d water beneath a GrtiGil if the site articularly the recharge basin and Let 11), has not }leen ronsidere Further anal' _* fin 3 that the region3.1 groundwater el-yatior'i is i11?prC�hlirta!21y 3•t- :'i'£i I:-, 'e trir:.:tn C>_;� level �nlsi). Test JI Borings Cor14!:CtI on SiE� and dt;p;CiS'.j on the freiirninar' .ilbd.'tiiSl(iY2 l�iap pefrhed µe32;:f t'esent at an eleva!ion of approximatciv 13.6 feat 311;ve rlsl it; both ho?es. Based upon this and p_rched steam ac tivitx south of tilx site, there. .; ! :i)I *7ar.i3ed water beneath the recharge basin and .Lot 11, svhiclt tray be, part of this system, r Consequently, shoulil excavation ockur for the Tec ;:tl?�lsln �• o- 11, the hydrology O this sv;tetn, Inclu<ii:i tb, lve tc!ha e :]iii: "t11,'.if (`. t 53r1:t:s:Y System ,L., r Lot '.1,U e+•. ersely' aficc,ed, Additional i st borings could 1 con ttl+ rc-d in •';e .:r?ca of Ii 11 t0 determine t1+2 ) l:iL' and ?tLti '!0 f p l L i': t ?rte`8 ba`in arld Lot } a, r C t ,<t t 1 C, 7 ZSi t•:) ll,trS would likely "silt- ;n„ Ther:�by minimizing`os:, of* +eater. n :li rna:a.e to additior.a�s;?i l orir. s :vould be to consid;r a RiJc)1!l d d.:Sib .. DLK" to 1h,. snlSll qu:ltldi.' 0-froad Sllff;:Ce aC'?, it tray be 54-2 NORTH COUNTRY BOAC, MILLER FACE, NY 117,4 (516) 331.1455 possible to use Catch 'basins, and if nccessary pro`ij,2 an ovet'flcw totl��� s math enol of the depression. A beret could In. provided t crease _ clos,a c) :c: r fc r $ r., L, ; � �7 tr ,.za: � s t;ii.. , r.o. :o overflow to wetlands. At leas, two in01.- Ct StoraQa tih--L'i d La rro:ide '_:tier modification would involve reducing lot t 'i ^+ Sn >t: .. ha a $ i ting ; sires o ��,C._) „ua. . i;;e: no: �. t... main .c. road (and/or moving lots to east), in order to provide si:iiident area for r;.location of rot 11 to the arealust west of Lot 10. The road right-of-xav Ccr a "tap" to the adiacent pro trrt should be � ro:ec� ,provided and could be built if recess;n; rr , 111 s^ u'•' e c-e p? •• private drive via a 280A variance until such ttn,a :is me- "tar" is nece,":a y. Please review these concerns and call to ui<.:-,;ss gar:.. if you are i, � reemc. tt, the applicant should be contacted and not;f ed of tlhe re.edl to revise the Long EA,F part IIi, or pprovide design modification. A: this time we area satisfecd ;side other por.ions r `the Part i11, and once the perched water issue is resolved, I t:elieve we could pro-vide a Determination of Significance. Thank you for Your attention to this matts,r, arcl p1,a;e call if you ;rave any questions. Very tnul ;nRrS rle; J. 1Z1,1hiS.CEP,A Z C P CRAMER, V ��i�� �c���SSOCIATES ENVIRONNIENT `4,Lit,�ni'� .,'�G CONSULTANTS r YOUNG & YOUNG nl5✓ PLANNING, ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11801 Telephone 516-727-2303 Facsimile 516-727-0144 October 28, 1992 Ms. Melissa Spiro, Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES (85-1482) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP at Southold, T/O Southold, New York Dear Melissa: Enclosed herewith are twelve (12) sets of the Preliminary Subdivision Map, last dated October 22, 1992, for the above captioned project. After considerable delay, due to the clay and perched water condition, we would now like to get this project back on track. We have recently completed test holes satisfactory to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and based on soil conditions selected a revised site for the recharge area. If you require additional data for your proper review of this preliminary plan, please contact Attorney Donald A. Rettaliata or our office. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young 219 W SOUTOLD TITv! HWYjetN PLAN , IiNG Encs. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. +2 sets of prints ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG THOMASC.WOLPERT KENNETHF.ABRU77,O Professional Engineer Land Surveyor Professional Engineer &Land SurveyorLand Surveyor LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACTS GROUP BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION SCTM #1000-55-6-35, 36 AND 56-1-1 LAUREL AVENUE SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK NEW YORK 1 t ■ ' LONG ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM PART III - EVALUATION OF IMPACT BAYBERRY ESTATES SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN ' PROPOSED ACTION: Residential Cluster Subdivision ' PROJECT LOCATION: Laurel Avenue SCTM 1000-55-6-35 , 36 and 56-1-1 ' Southold, New York APPLICANT: Dr. Francis O'Malley t c/o Mars Sloan & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 Mr. Donald Rettaliata, Attorney ' FILING AGENCY: Planning Board Office Town of Southold ' 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PREPARER AND CONTACT: Maguire Group Architects/Engineers/Planners P.C. 3237 Route 112 Suite 7A Medford, NY 11763 ' ( 516) 696-6007 Jeffrey L. Seeman, REM, REA \NINIIIIIi1N///� r/•/y�H9/ r W JEFFREY SEEMAN ;D= f-: REM ;2 %s ......... a 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS ' TOPIC SECTION ' INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . 0 ' DESCRIPTION OF ACTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 .0 IMPACT ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 0 * Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 1 * Water Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 2 * Vegetation & Wildlife Resources . . . . . . . . . 3 . 3 * Agriculture Land Resources . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 4 * Open Space & Recreation Resources . . . . . . . . 3 . 5 1 GENERAL ASSESSMENTS & CONCLUSIONS STATEMENT . . . . . . . 4. 0 ' PHOTOGRAPHS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. 0 BAYBERRY ESTATES SKETCH PLAN, OCTOBER 1989 . . . . . . . 6. 0 APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0 1 . Environmental Assessment Form Dated May 1987 2 . Test Hole Data/Sketch Plan Dated June 13 , 1989 3 . Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Report of February 19, 1991 ' LIST OF REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8. 0 1 1 1 1 ' 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed action involves Suffolk County Tax Map number ' (SCTM# ) 1000-55-35-36 and 56-1-1 under application to subdivide 50 . 0171 acres to provide an 18 lot clustered subdivision along the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town of Southold, New York. The subject site is located approximately 700 linear feet north of Main Road (NYS Rt. 25) and 150 linear feet south of Yennecott Drive; for site development a ± 1600 linear foot access roadway is proposed with connection to Laurel Avenue. ' In accordance with New York State Quality Review part 617 (SEQR) a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) Part I was filed together with the proposed Bayberry Estates Subdivision Map ' (Young & Young) in May 1987 . Subsequent revisions to the map have resulted in the current layout - "Cluster" Subdivision Sketch Plan prepared for Bayberry Estates at Southold, October 23 , 1989 (Young & Young) . An addendum to the LEAF was filed in August 1990, at the request of the Planning Board, Town of Southold. Southold' s environmental consultants, Cramer, Voorhis ' & Associates (CVA) reviewed the application and filed a report with the Town in February 1991. The CVA report recommended the Planning Board request a completed LEAF Part III - Evaluation of Impact Narrative to further assess significance of impact. ' Resources of concern include: 1 . Impact on Land ' * Construction on slopes of 15% or greater. ' * Construction in an area containing intermittent streams and poor soils. 2. Impact on Water 1 * Action requires use of a municipal water supply that has not approved availability. * Suitability of soils and subsoils for sanitary disposal. * Impact to wetlands; natural drainage and hydrology. 3 . Impact on Plants and Animals * Site supports wildlife habitats for raptors, heron, deer, and herptiles of species of special concern and potential threatened species status as identified by New York State and/or Federal lists. 4. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources * Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than ten acres of agricultural land. 5. Impact on Open Space ' * Potential reduction of open space. ' 1 The Maguire Group was engaged by the applicant to prepare the LEAF Part III narrative. The assessments and impact analyses presented in this document are based on current and previously ' accepted reports and data, Maguire' s field observations and our professional interpretation of this scientific and engineering information. where applicable, the narrative proposes mitigation plans to reduce impact significance. The minor revisions to the subdivision sketch resulting from mitigation are not included with this report. This information will be submitted upon request, in response to the Town' s comments and findings to the ' Part III . Additionally, to enhance brevity, reproduction of standard technical documents used in preparation of this report has been excluded. A complete list of references is included at the end of this report. (Refer to Section 8 .0 List of References or contact Maguire Group directly) . 1 2 t 1 ' 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION ' The Applicant proposes to subdivide a 50. 0171 acre parcel into an 18 lot, clustered residential subdivision known as "Bayberry Fstates" . The property is an irregular shaped piece, located _700 feet north of New York State Route 25 with approximately 1,760 feet of frontage along the west side of Laurel Avenue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The proposed Subdivision Sketch Plan prepared by Young & Young dated October 23 , 1989 ' provides for 15 lots ( lot# ' s 3-10, 12-18 ) designed around two cul de sacs placed (as spurs) north and south off the east - west 1,600 LF access road. A third cul de sac provides for access to ' a single lot ( lot# 11) and dead ends the road at the western boundary. The two additional lots, numbers 1 and 2 are located in the north-east corner of the site with direct access from Laurel Avenue. The Long Island Rail Road tracks border the site to the south. To the north, are residential homes and a park; Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) power lines and towers transect (northeast to southwest) the site in the northerly area, extending to the property edge. To the west is "High Point Meadows" and to the east, "Long Pond Estates" , residential subdivisions currently under construction. ' Zoning use district for the site is designated "R-80" , residential low density "A" ; the action conforms with current land use ordinances. The site contains a New York State Freshwater Wetland; flagged by the State on June 1, 1989. The wetlands area appears on the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) Preliminary Freshwater Wetland Map dated May 31, 1991. The wetland area is also shown, together with the State required 100 foot buffer zone, on the October 23 , 1989 Subdivision Sketch for Bayberry Estates. All proposed lots and structures remain outside the wetlands buffer zone. The applicant has proposed a 33 . 9 ± acre open space area, the majority of which includes the wetlands and a contiguous upland zone. This area also provides a deep buffer to the 1 existing residential lots along the north boundary, and along the west boundary. Actual development is clustered within a zone approximately 300 feet north of the existing railroad tracks and 1 600 feet west from Laurel Avenue. 1 i 1 i 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 3.0 IMPACT ANALYSES 1 1 1 3.0 IMPACT ANALYSES 3.1 Land Resources Construction on Slope of 15% or Greater This action requires minor areas of construction on slopes _ greater than 15%. The impact results from the combined affects of the natural topography ( >15% slope) and the proposed use of the area for a stormwater recharge basin, roadway and cul de sac. The cul de sac provides access to lot #11. It is suggested, by the CVA analysis , that lot #11 be accessed by a private drive to _ avoid a need for the cul de sac and reduce fill required for its construction. The total area of construction on slopes greater than 15% is relatively small when compared to the entire parcel ( less than 2% of the total area) . To reduce slope impacts by allowing access to lot #11 via a private drive is reasonable, providing the tap road alignment with the parcel to the west can be achieved. One alternative examined included relocating the recharge basin to an area south of lot #11 (and provide the private drive ' access) . This would further mitigate impacts to slopes greater than 15% and avoid disturbing the natural topography. While impact to slopes would be reduced, the redirection of the site' s collected stormwater would reduce the quantity of run-off now ' entering the natural swale area north of lot #11. Subsequently disturbance to the overall natural drainage pattern and hydrology is expected by this alternative. The area of impact is specific ' to the impervious road surface area where run-off is controlled by the proposed stormwater collection and storage system. This alternative is expected to adversely impact natural hydrology and could contribute to wetland deterioration. Therefore, it is more desirable to retain location of the recharge basin as shown on the subdivision map dated October 1989 and utilize the existing topography and natural drainage basin. Only minor impacts are expected. It is also reasonable to predict that construction on slopes greater than 15% can be mitigated by minor design changes. The area of construction along the 15% slope is not very significant. When compared to the site' s area, the impact occurs to less than 2% of the parcel. Therefore, the importance of the impact on land caused by ' construction on slopes of greater than 15% is of minor to moderate significance. ' Intermittent Streams/Poor Soils The proposed action was assessed by CVA to require construction in an area containing intermittent streams and poor soils. 1 4 The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Suffolk Countv, New York, existing topographic maps and test hole data recorded in June 1989 indicate conditions exist that may support intermittent, perched stream activity; particularly in the area where the recharge basin is proposed. Field visits and observations did not confirm presence or absence of intermittent stream activity. The site' s soil types are classified as: , Haven loam of 2%-6% slopes Haven loam of 0%-2% slopes Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 3%-8% slopes, eroded Plymouth gravelly loamy sand of 8%-15% slopes , eroded Canadice silt loam ' These soil types have generally acceptable engineering limitations for building except for the Canadice silt loam. According to the Soil Survey, the Canadice silt loam soils are ' seasonally wet and their slow permeability in the upper horizons provide a less desirable use for drainage structures. However, 5 to 6 feet below the upper soil level the Canadice silt loam has very rapid permeability characteristics. This would provide a suitable soil for stormwater recharge; providing the upper soil level is excavated/or excavated and back filled with clean fill ' material, suitable for recharge basin design and construction. It is feasible to locate the recharge basin as proposed on the Bayberry Estates sketch plan, providing these soil t characteristics and construction considerations are addressed. To reduce disruption to area hydrology, it is suggested that an outlet such as a positive overflow pipe or spillway be provided at the recharge basin. The outlet would outfall to the natural swale area (remaining after basin construction) immediately north of the proposed recharge basin, and supplement the natural hydrology which may currently support the wetland area. This may ' be particularly important during low rainfall events. The elevation of the outlet should be considered in the final design of the stormwater control plan. ' An alternative design scheme would provide relocation of the recharge basin to the south of lot #11. Providing the soils are suitable for recharge, an overflow structure would not be suggested. Under this alternative design, the natural swale area which exists north of lot #11 would remain undisturbed. Hydrology may be impacted particularly during periods of low ' precipitation. However, the impact to hydrology would likely be moderate to minor because the run-off that now enters the natural swale would continue to flow to the swale after development, with ' exception for the quantity of run-off altered by the proposed roadway and drainage collection system. This would be directed to the new recharge basin south of lot #11. ' It is our opinion the recharge basin is more suitably located as shown on the Bayberry Estates Sketch Plan dated October 1989 (north of lot #11 ) . As a mitigation for potential impact to ' hydrology an overflow outlet to the natural swale area should be provided. ' 5 1 Dependent on future test hole results, the existing soil in the recharge basin area may need to be excavated to a depth of 5 to 6 feet and suitable fill placed in the effective area of recharge ' within the basin bottom and walls. This mitigation may be required whether the recharge basin is placed north or south of lot #11. It is more the result of engineering limitations of the soil conditions and not purely the result of significant impact ' or proposed mitigation. Therefore if the existing soils are determined not to be Canadice silt loam in either area proposed for the recharge basin, there may be no need for additional ' excavation and fill; and disturbance to hydrology is expected to result in only moderate or minor impacts. t 1 1 ' 6 1 ' 3.2 Water Resources Water Supply The action requires drinking water supply from the Greenport Water District. This water purveyor has experienced supply limitation, and the proposed Bayberry Estates subdivision will have an impact on water supply resources. A typical family of four will use approximately 90 gallons per capita per day for drinking, food preparation, washing and sanitary needs. Although ' water conserving devices ( i.e. low flush water closets, flow restrictors, etc. ) are becoming standard in modern residences, a figure of 360 gallons per day per unit is assumed to be an acceptable water demand level for Bayberry Estates. This computes to an overall site demand of 6 ,480 gallons per day (say 6, 500 GPD) . ' The impact to drinking water supply cannot be thoroughly evaluated at this time. The applicant has requested a statement of availability from Greenport Water company. The response from ' the purveyor, indicates water will be provided for the project at a future date. If water is not available, the project cannot be built; there would be no predictable impact to water resources under a no build scenario. If the purveyor grants water supply, ' it is anticipated that (because water is available) the impact to water resources would be only of minor to moderate significance. ' Sanitary Disposal Each residential unit is expected to generate 300 GPD of sanitary ' discharge. These flows are recommended by design standards suggested by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, (SCDOH) the agency that will review and respond to sanitary plans for the subdivision. No municipal sewer system exists in this ' area of Southold, and it is desired to utilize an individual septic system for each lot. As required for the SCDOH approval of sanitary waste disposal designs, test pits must be excavated ' and inspected for each septic system. Soil permeability characteristics will be evaluated with respect to leaching capability. If soil types are unsuitable for septic systems design, leaching pool areas can be excavated to an acceptable depth and backfilled with clean sand to provide suitable disposal conditions. Minimum lot areas accepted by SCDOH for septic use is 20 , 000 SF. The Young & Young yield plan is well within these ' regulations. Lot numbers 9 and 10 and 6 and 7 are contiguous to and at higher elevations (±10 feet) than the wetlands/buffer area. There is concern for potential impact to the surface water, intermittent stream, wetland hydrology from sanitary disposal generated from these four lots. The sanitary flows generated from the entire ' subdivision is also a concern with regard to groundwater impacts. 7 There is always concern for the pollution impacts to water resources generated from land development, on Long Island, particularly in Eastern Suffolk County. Municipal sanitary sewer ' systems and treatment facilities can provide some control to sanitary waste disposal, but availability is often limited in areas of Suffolk. ' Existing treatment facilities are experiencing operational difficulties on the East End, largely due to capacity and design limitations of the plants. In June of 1991, the NYSDEC assessed the success of Denitrification Systems use in Suffolk County. These sanitary disposal systems were designed to remove nitrogen from sanitary wastewaters; and allow the nitrogen depleted wastewater to leach back to groundwater. The method expected a reduction in nitrogen loading of water resources and to restore water to groundwater resources. As of this date, the NYSDEC determined that the Denitrification System is not an acceptable method for sanitary waste disposal in Suffolk County. Subsequently, Bayberry Estates is exclusively limited to ' individual septic system use for sanitary waste disposal in accordance with Suffolk County Department of Health and NYSDEC requirements. It is upon this criteria that a determination of no other reasonable alternative can be proposed and assessed for sanitary disposal. Therefore only septic system disposal impacts are evaluated. ' Impact from nitrogen laden wastewater on water resources can be theoretically quantified. Nitrogen loading from septic system disposal can be calculated, and a zone of influence established ' to determine and assess pollutant loading impact of nitrogen on ground and surface water. For the assessment groundwater monitoring wells, test pits, soils taxonomy and characteristics, hydrologic data (vertical and horizontal flow direction and quantitative data for surface and subsurface water including intermittent stream activity if present etc. ) would need to be established. Additionally, the effect that the disposal method ' would have on wetland deterioration could require a Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET) analysis and assessment be conducted. The WET method is a wetland qualitative assessment developed by the US Army Corp of Engineers & USEPA requiring extensive, long range field and historic data collection for 144 parameters. The LEAF Part III narrative does not require assessment in the detail described above. Generally this type of environmental assessment ' is conducted for regional impacts on wetlands and water quality. If conducted for Bayberry Estates, these detailed assessments would be misapplied; examining only a small geographic area and disregarding impacts caused by regional and seasonal influences. This approach was ruled out for the Part III Narrative because of its nonconformance. Generally, nitrogen loadings in densely 1 developed areas are a concern to groundwater impacts. Impacts from the 18 lot clustered development over 50 acres will have lesser significance than projects of higher density. Obviously a net increase in nitrogen loading of water resources is ' unavoidable. The effect of nitrogen may be lessened by the plant life in the wetland area and buffer zones. Vegetation utilizes 8 ' nitrogen as a nutrient, collecting the compound through the plant root system. Providing the soils permit adequate leaching of sanitary waste, nitrogen concentrations are expected to be ' diluted by interaction with natural hydrologic conditions and absorbed by plant life sustained by existing wetland and/or upland conditions. This may reduce impact to a degree which can only be theoretically determined by long range multifaceted field and historic data assessment. Providing the septic systems are adequately maintained and land use limited to acceptable density, water resource deterioration from Bayberry Estates is at this time not quantifiable but expected to be of moderate impact. The ' SCDOH regulations and review will provide for future and final determination of sanitary disposal methods. It is recommended to review the SCDOH evaluation for a final ' evaluation of water resource impacts. Impact to Intermittent Stream and wetlands ' The use of the southwest corner of the site and impact concerns regarding potential intermittent stream activity and wetland resources has been presented in Sections 3 . 1 and 3. 2. The importance of the wetlands and uplands for habitats for plants and animals is more extensively evaluated in Section 3. 3. 1 1 9 1 3.3 Vegetation and Wildlife Resources It has been reported the site supports raptors, heron, deer and ' herptiles, potential threatened species and species of special concern. The Town of Southold required that the site' s habitats and ' wildlife be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. Description of Ecology The site is characterized by wetland and upland environments that provide ecologically significant habitats for a diverse population of wildlife and vegetation. To observe and record habitat conditions, Maguire Group conducted a field visit and preliminary assessment on June 10, 1991. The wetland area delineated by NYSDEC includes a stillwater pond approximately 60 feet wide and 100 feet in length (with an unknown depth) . The pond' s perimeter is heavily vegetated with almost no areas of open space along the banks. The transition zone between the wetland and upland area is also densely vegetated with saplings and shrubs. Soil survey maps and an evaluation by CVA (CVA February 15, 1991) suggest the wetland is indicative of intermittent stream activity. However, the lack of a formulative transition zone sustaining a dominance of faculative wetland vegetation and the density of shrub and saplings in the wetland area and pond, suggests the surface water may be resultant of an abandoned man made irrigation pond. Test hole data in the wetland zone shows the presence of hydric soils, and this area may in fact be the zone where the Canadice silt loam soils predominate. It would be sensible from an agricultural viewpoint to locate an irrigation pond in this area because the upper soil level would retain water. This area is too wet to sustain mature trees in the pond ' and several fallen trees were observed, Red-osier dogwood tree stumps were observed with a -3" caliper, with new shoots generation. Black gum, Red maple, wild grape and sensitive fern ' also characterize the swamp and bank area. The vegetation of the upland area is indicative of old field and judging from the wetland and pond vegetation, the site may have been abandoned for agricultural use 25 to 30 years ago. Areas within the wetlands have been disturbed; a 55 gallon drum, abandoned farm equipment and several large deposits of scallop ' shells were observed. This disturbance is minor and generally the wetland is well protected by vegetation and not easily accessed by man, resulting in a high quality wetland area. 10 1 These conditions provide for wildlife habitats classified as ' "Shrub Swamp" . Beyond the swamp, in the poorly defined transition zone and upland area, the habitat is characteristic of "Shrub Sapling/Opening Edge" . These two habitats, while ' separated by a NYSDEC jurisdictional delineation, are interrelated ecological zones. The swamp provides food and shelter for birds, mammals, vegetation, insects and herptiles which themselves act as food source for upland birds and mammals. ' Wildlife hunting space includes the shrub sapling/opening edge and the open upland area to the north of the site, especially important to avian predators. Deer lays were observed in the ' shrub sapling/opening edge; frogs and turtles visually and audibly identified in the shrub swamp; rabbits, catbirds mourning doves, crow, northern flicker, mocking bird and sparrow also ' visually and or audibly observed. Upland vegetation included but was not limited to gray birch, weeping willow, eastern red cedar, white birch, Russian olive, ' red oak, eastern Baccharis (saltbrush) and varieties of golden rod, ferns, Rosa multiflora, grasses and poison ivy. The vegetation in the upland area provides ground cover, avian 1 cover/nesting areas and shelter. The open areas are suitable for raptor feeding on small mammals. The CVA report supports the assessment of wildlife habitat abundance by visual observation of species and presence of spent shells from use of the property by hunters. Evaluation The NYSDEC published list (which includes the Federal list) of potentially threatened species and species of special concern, ' and the State list of protected plants identify vegetation and wildlife protected by State Conservation law. There is indication that the natural environment of the site can or does ' provide permanent and/or periodic habitat for several species of protected plants and animals. The area of open space provided in the Bayberry Estates Sketch ' Plan is warranted and its geographical location with respect to natural wildlife habitat co-existance with the proposed clustered subdivision is well selected. The wetland area in the west area ' of the site is as ecologically significant to the habitats in the northerly open space area as is the open uplands importance to the wetlands. The 100 foot wetlands buffer provides both a protection to the designated wetland area and an enhanced transition area that extends the shrub sapling/ opening edge habitat into the habitats defined by upland area. The plan provides preservation of low ground cover, open field, mature trees, wet areas and areas of transition among a mixture of habitats. This permits wildlife movement on the ground and in the air for purposes of nesting, hunting and hiding, unrestricted ' by manmade features. Generally it is not the pure presence of people that disturbs wildlife habitat but rather man' s physical changes that create problems. Physical change can be minor as with walking through a field and disturbing a rabbit to the more ' extreme level of a major agricultural development that would remove all natural habitats, vegetation, disturb hydrology, etc. ' 11 ' Therefore, to further encourage preservation the clustered development is well placed within the site, with respect to the more valuable natural resource area. Some disruption to wildlife ' will occur, habitats will be significantly disturbed in areas of development; this is resource loss and impact which cannot be avoided. As construction takes place, the animals from these habitats will likely seek refuge in the preserved area or relocate to areas off-site. The wildlife that cannot relocate may not survive, however the disruption is limited and may be outweighed by the continuity of the preserved areas; more likely to support habitats for species of protection and concern. The habitats for plant and wildlife preservation may be enhanced by the long range impact of the residential development. There may be protected species that under current conditions are being destroyed by unlawful hunting and trapping practices. If the residents elect to prohibit hunting and trapping of animals and ' restrict access to the open space zones, sensitive habitats will be protected. This is expected if a natural resource management program is developed and maintained. It is not encouraged to ' obstruct the open areas with fencing or structures that would restrict wildlife movement. Enhancing the perimeter with natural landscaping that would screen out unnatural movement and ' discourage entry by people, but still allow for lateral movement of wildlife between habitats, is permissible. Future placement of an osprey platform may provide additional wildlife refuge. Attention to future development and potential impacts from the ' area along the west boundary of Bayberry Estates should be considered. Ideally this parcel should include a zone of open space preservation contiguous to the area proposed by Bayberry Estates. The impact to wildlife and vegetation is considered moderate because of the balance between preservation of the existing more valuable natural resource area and a low density cluster plan; albeit these are forms of mitigation. 12 1 ' PARTIAL LISTING OF SPECIES OBSERVED OR EXPECTED TO EXIST IN HABITATS - By Common Name ' ANIMALS: ' *Great Blue Heron *Eastern Screech Owl *Great Egret *American Goldfinch *Snowy Egret *Mourning Dove ' *Common Yellow Throat Redwing Blackbird *Swamp Sparrow Crow *Northern Harrier *Brown Headed Cowbird Bull Frog *Northern Flicker Green Frog *Brown Thrasher Wood Frog *Mocking Bird Spotted Salamander Field Sparrow ' Eastern Newt Eastern Cottontail Two lined Salamander White Tailed Deer Snapping Turtle Eastern Harvest Mouse ' Painted Turtle *Eastern Box Turtle Eastern Ribbon Snake *Alder Fly Catcher *Red Tailed Hawk Northern Leopard Frog ' Red Bat ***Osprey *Gray Catbird VEGETATION: Red Oak Poison Ivy Eastern Red Juniper **Golden Rod ' Red Swamp Maple Chokeberry Black Gum Milkweed Gray Birch Saltbrush **White Birch Russian Olive Crested Wood Fern Weeping Willow Sensitive Fern Rosa Multiflora **Alder Duckweed ' Sassafras Common Ragweed **Wild Grape Catalpa * Protected wildlife in New York State ** Some species of these plants are protected by New York State ' *** Threatened species of wildlife 13 t � s 217 Is 21 /3 - ' .... ' s+!�t•; `.. �Q Shiloh ak¢m° rj �j=�-t amt _ •i '_� /J\'�� ' 't" i - ICY' - �1 r• •.V _ 1 If- 40 0 � ,- ..l• SC � - ! _q..-�\ 30 �. .. ;{fes' x - �-� . v I w ?I dda / T� ' , SO-4 - ; _ .• 1s \ �. �n s / Jennings FI 51 a° s - ��` o IMINARY FRES} *ATER 1NETLAN r ISA Sou <. P- SUBJECI:40, REVJSm thol s 6/ This is a Section of the 53 Tentative'freshw�ter Wetlands Map I Sr Tor _ County 1 9 - S founder '�'• �°< �,. fan°�naPrepared pursuant to Artict�24 of the Environmental Harpers 2 Park CAeffa&k'au� R � I S L A N-D n Pt 3 ,. New York State wartrnent o�'�ranmenta( Southold o� ;> Conservation. r r �� iF • a N D„ u .. �...G<!r• 'B• _ tel/ �• !r•6/ sourool°s Paradi s Yacht Clu :: Pomt_ O l; r R4- T � .•-f hoz / ,°, ..v� V .� r�� ` /.. is Isughtn i Wateo z Q �rt "• ( 14 F. ` 4 reek M i'S�' Ceda PA7TIh'- _ 14 ' 3 .4 Agricultural Land Resources The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land, into a residential land use. An impact to agricultural land use was a noted concern. The site is assessed to have some agricultural value albeit ' limited in area by some soil types, wetlands and the natural topography conditions; obstacles in converting the land for agriculture. Evidenced by the old field vegetation, and what may t be an old irrigation pond, sections of the site may, in the past, been farmed. Development of the site for residential purpose will have unavoidable long term impact to the use of the site for ' agriculture. Other sites exist in Southold where agricultural use could be considered. The subdivisions under construction to the west of the site and along the east side of Laurel Avenue create a compatible land use with the proposed action but compete with overall land to remain for farming. Bayberry Estates exacerbates the condition of land use for residential development that historically was planned for farm use. This impact to land use (with focus on agricultural land resources in Southold Township) was assessed by comparing the subdivision impacts to agricultural impacts. The alternative land use for agricultural purposes may have a more significant adverse impact over several environmental concerns: * Disturbance to Natural Hydrologic Conditions - due to regrading and potential to significantly alter natural drainage to attain maximum site yield. * Potential for Surface Water Contamination - Agricultural ' use could provide a high risk to wetland deterioration if herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers are misapplied or if an accidental spill occurs. * Removal of Natural Vegetation - converting the site would drastically and potentially, irreversibly destroy habitats preserved by the Bayberry cluster plan. Similar preservation of the habitats could result in economic hardships to farming a restricted site by reduction of crop yield and land use. Natural resource availability t within Southold Township, would be reduced if sections of the site were not preserved for open space. A productive use of approximately twenty acres of agricultural land resources would adversely impact area wide farmland use. This impact must be weighed by the potential deterioration of the site' s ecological value in comparing impacts between the cluster residential and agricultural uses. Relative to this comparative analysis, impact significance to agriculture is expected to be moderate to minor. ' 15 1 ' 3 . 5 Open Space and Recreation Resources The development of the 18 lot cluster subdivision will ' potentially reduce open space and recreational resources in Southold. The proposed action provides slightly more than 30 acres of open space area. The cluster unit plan concentrates the area of development and provides essential open space which includes an important wetland - transition zone - upland continuity. As stated in section 3 .3 the natural existing ecology is best supported by this land preservation approach. t The lack of disturbance to this mix of habitats is important to recognize when considering open space and recreation. Even passive recreation (hiking, exercise trails, etc. ) can disrupt sensitive nesting and hunting habits of birds, reptiles and amphibians. The picking or transplant of New York State protected plants is ecologically damaging and unlawful. To reduce the occurrence of ecological degradation even by ' unintentional practices, the open space areas are not recommended for recreational use. Recreational suitability is also questionable because of the density of vegetation in some areas. Attempts to eradicate nuisance vegetation (i.e. poison ivy) could have more significant impact on other plants and animals. Similarly uncontrolled hunting, fishing and trapping could damage the natural resource value of the open space areas. The subdivision will predictably restrict access to the site by the general public. This results in a net loss of available, public recreational space but a net gain in controlled open space resource management. There is a park along the North border of the site; recreational facilities exist in the immediate area. ' Therefore, the cluster plan supports open space preservation and impact to open space and area lost for recreation is of moderate to minor significance. 1 ■ 16 1 ' 4.0 GENERAL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS STATEMENT ' 4.0 General Assessment and Conclusions Statement The proposed action impact concerns predominate on the sensitive ' environmental conditions established by the existing wetland system and its inter-relationship with transition zone and upland ecological natural resource values. While intermittent stream activity cannot conclusively be verified or denied, the parcel t has valuable wet resources including hydrophytic vegetation, aquatic wildlife, water dependent species and hydric soil conditions. These characteristics are equally important to the upland habitats that greatly depend on the wet area for survival. The Bayberry Estates cluster subdivision as presented in the t Young & Young Sketch Plan, has produced an extreme and cautious approach to avoid disturbance of the site' s natural resources. Several additional mitigating measures proposed in the Cramer, Voorhis & Associates Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review Report, February 1991 concur with Maguire Group' s specific assessments. Construction on slopes of 15% or greater can be further mitigated by accessing lot #11 with a private driveway, thus eliminating the cul de sac at the westerly terminus of the access road. Suitability of soils for stormwater recharge can be mitigated by either: 1 ) Relocation of the recharge basin to the south of lot #11 (although this may adversely impact wetland related hydrology) ' 2) Locating the recharge basin as proposed, excavating unsuitable soil and backfilling the effective area of recharge with suitable material. To encourage natural hydrology supporting the wetlands, an outlet structure is ' suggested at the north end of the recharge basin. Suitability of soils for sanitary waste disposal can be mitigated by: 1) Evaluation of test pit information as required by Suffolk ' County Department of Health prior to sanitary disposal plan approval. 2 ) Removal of unsuitable soils and replacement with soils acceptable for septic leaching Availability of drinking water supply must be confirmed by the ' Greenport Water Company. Physically, water supply is readily available from the main running north and south along the west side of Laurel Avenue. If water is not available, there would be ' no net loss of water resources. Disruption to potential intermittent stream activity and the wetland area has been minimized by clustering and by suggestions ' regarding drainage and sanitary structures. 17 ' Habitats for valuable vegetation and wildlife resources have been carefully preserved by cluster designs. The upland/wetland open space is largely contiguous with total open space comprising ' about 60% of the site. Agricultural land resource reduced by the residential use development of more than 10 acres of agricultural is an unavoidable impact. It is assessed that if the natural resource of the site' s ecology is preserved, approximately 20 acres remain for farming. The practicality of crop yield for ± 50 acre site is questionable. Potential impacts to the environmentally sensitive areas caused by agricultural pesticides and herbicides, alteration to hydrology and suitability of soils for agriculture may greatly reduce agricultural value, and/or adversely impact significant ecological land value. The Bayberry Estates plan supports open space goals by use of subdivision cluster techniques. Recreational activity of the site will likely be restricted to the immediate homeowners. Providing an acceptable natural resource program is implemented ' and maintained, unauthorized (hunting, trapping, vegetation removal) activities will be minimized. This could result in an overall protection to sensitive habitats. Additionally, other recreational areas are provided within reasonable distance of the site. In accordance with the review of impact concerns of land use, ' water, ecology, and existing environmental conditions the Bayberry Estates residential subdivision plan (October 1989) has been evaluated to have moderate to minor impact to these ' parameters. It is recommended that soil conditions be evaluated and further assessed for suitable stormwater and sanitary disposal practices, as required for Suffolk County Health Department Approval, and a final determination of drinking water availability be confirmed. 1 ' 18 1 1 1 ' 5.0 PHOTOGRAPHS t ' BAYBERRY ESTATES PHOTO LOG PHOTO NUMBER DESCRIPTION ' 1 Bayberry Estates site looking north along Laurel Avenue t 2 Bayberry Estates site looking west from Laurel Avenue t 3 Bayberry Estates site looking south along Laurel Avenue 4 Upland area looking northwest 5 Old field - potential hunting zone for avian predators 6 Open space upland area 7 Upland - old field looking north 8 Upland area - note ground cover 9 Upland area - note ground cover 10 LILCO Tower transects northeast to southwest ' 11 Typical upland plant 12 Wetland looking west 13 Wetland - possibly old irrigation pond 14 Probable deer lay area 15 Shrub swamp wetland ' 16 Scallops shells 17 Shrub swamp wetland 18 Typical wetland vegetation ' 19 Wetland - note uprooted tree 20 Wetlands 1 21 Wetlands - note abandoned drum 22 wetland vegetation - food source a � s r r 4� i yLt n } 4 _ rh � SCna yypp`Cy^' t LAS 5` tt� �'L.n-yq 6�L��•l'f $ 4 k K . Y J,. � V E �J ,, i ����,- a:, _ ' ••;�, `' �` r . ., .. , !ro = b'7r.. ,, Y x >s �' �� r{ h� �_ her^ t�3' �'� ' '.. „'.5%�..�� © �� O -1 t�.� l� © O , A k O • rs v � � S r y( �• RW2-`SBD * , y:. It 14 if r Ml4 11x4 S �.•• SQA \>]��,�� 1� p1�N � � 1 � � Dom` "T •,a��• - ii -� Y Y 1 Y. 71 i F—r-P. lid , �•.- � i z k F J / ` ate', Ilia' \ ® ! 6.0 BAYBERRY ESTATES SKETCH PLAN OCTOBER 1980 1 1 1 1 ' 7.0 APPENDIX 1 1 1 i ■ 1 1 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM MAY 1987 1 t APPE.MDIE A EAF ' DIVIRamoon AL ASSESSME!rr GD Pre1.e• Infra vetan ' MDTICE: This doeu+nent r• dollened t# Assist in detam4ning Whether the action Drocated nay Aare a significant effect on the anvlydn.w"t. Piasse c'aloleta the entire Data Sheet. Answer$ tb those questions .111 be cWsidared tl #art Of the a0011cactol for s#Oreval andMay N subject to further verification and oublie review. Provide Any Additional lnfer.wetim you believe .III be needed to comisto PARTS 2 and 3. ' It is 0900=14 that toetiletlan of tea EAF .111 be deoenoent on Informtion currently available end .111 net Inrolw now studies. msasrcl or investigation• If Infamwtion regal ring succi ad01t1om1 Wore It unary L#IA, 1g Indicate and. so*clfy each instance. SAME or P16.1Ecr Nor AM ADDRESS OF OVNER Itf nifr.r-nei Francis O'Malley ' Laurel Avenue. Southold, New York AMUS ARB " OF APPLlani: _ trees; . ' Frveancis O' Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata ,_ nal 285 West Main Street Esq. BUMIrm PMonE: 589-2500 ' tleecl Sayville, New York 11782 • •listacal t Ra ' OESCEtPTI^.� OF PWUECT' (Briefly describe tyre of oreject or action) _ Realty Subdivision 07+ $a. 017 /' IiCItE3 lAf'M /fi e07S OFn/.s,y i,J k-9n t�Oh!/N!i ' SVEi J/1 S/o/U /L/Zf:M ZS I TJ MIAf/V Yt7/V (PLEASE f�NPLETE EACH nUESTIUM - Indicate M.A. If not atoll to) ?3. 4 A--' ' I In opt--'IV 43- DES A. SITE CAIPTton (Physical setting of overall pmjgct, both develored And undevelOPed areas) Doti rel character of the land: r+nerally unifem slept Danerally uneven and rollim or irr'rvlar E. Present land' us*re: Urban Industrial conenrcial ,.-iuegrasM�Y'_, Rural _• ►nrrs�Agriculture _,�r _ I/A!'.�/.ir=• �a Tn . 7 2. Total 4:re490 Of #reject area: 50 acral. Ae#reafmto aena9r. Presenziv After Caaelletfon Presently After C:wletion ' Meador or Brushland21-4C, 9 beret 27. letres Hater Surface Ana D teres _0 a^--1 Farested -L-cern 3 acres Unregeuted frock. Aerleultural 0:Cres Aeres earth or fill) �_aern D urn Netlaed (F"Iftwater Or Roads. bulldinas —_ Tidal as nor Articles and other laved or' F.C.L.) 8 acres 8 surfaces cern Z; AC^l� aeref Other (indicate tye) D lcres 9. 1 :•re: L a. '+Rat it ^-td#1onAnt 1011 t-me(s) on nrefect site, Haven_Loam - t•e cher. b.arott outcreoornal on +.n 1.et tit-, —T.l ...V� y0 --•-•_ — i "at !s ;cote :C eedr c. N/A •eecl 1.l:•S 1 1 9 A. Aoo "Ierte oereenuge of proposed prefect site with slopes: 0.172: IA-ISL .�t: ISS or ' greetater 7. Is Project contlquis to, Or Contain a Oulldlnn or site listed on the Rational Register of Historic Pietist _ res A Ho J t a. vhat t1 the depth to the rater table-12 0 feet iZ 7b 27 r-7- /1•S VE7z YOC/Ntty Ye UNIy S. Do hunting or fishing opportunities Presently exist In the project areal —Tin _)L.-no hDa CNDL/M TO- Ooh ordjtct site contain any sptotal Of Plant or animal life that It Identified as threatened or ' endanoered - les X .lo. according to - Identify each species aol P'MrB .�t'y3yrC'r1 - r/rQjw/'7y}-j e;r,-'yN!'rr FG2 Ter?rev-re-nrr� e.o..;Z/�•sE nSP�CY Nrt/+nfrr /�r✓f- 5':/.7rttay�t^rJi><:-ttU�- 11. Are there amr unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (I.e. Cliffs, dunes. other gepldg/cal AV,0 ' formations - _Y" _2L4*. (Describe 1 OF 5f'0CJ.r 12. Is this prajRct site,presentl used 0 the community le'���z` J �! SAI r r tr or nHgnporneod as an open space or ncnetla area T�n ��Nd. i5•V/OGruC4r-- OF USC- GY ff'U.'V Z7?S /IO Cr4/Lb,,2 Il. Does. the Present Site offer or Include scenic views or vistas known to be Important to the Caesnttr? /N t•L'tr-77.L" rev A Re it. Strikes within or contiguous to Project area: .1IGAG- j-tr•>: 5 i1aeTyw>7T A--. o a. Ras of strike and non of river to MCU it Is tributary NIA C/tOSSCS -S/M- F,?" $L'Ul7i. '7-0 rUw 2T/ttt'ES; ' iS. Lakin. /ends. Hettand areas within or contiguous to project area: - A. Iuae N/A ; b. Site lin acres) N/A ld, twat ff the demtnant land use and toning classification within a 1/e mile radius of the project (e.g. t single faarlly residential. R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). ' AC /-/Cut rU?-T-•%LFT i[IJV 7-/,4-L VA C./}NVT S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and stale of project (fill in dimensions as loonoriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. ' b. PrejM acreage dowel coed. O acres Initially; II _9acres ultimately. ' C. Project acreage to reeln undeveloped 18 1 d. length of PrdJsct. In meet: NSA (If appropriate) ' e. If Proltdt 1s an eloanSlon of existing. Indicate percent of ascension proposed: building square foot- age NIA developed acreage N/A . L neper of off-strent carting spaces eatstino 0 proposed . 40 g. Maxton venicular trips generated Per hour 2.5 (upon conoletion of project) i�` 7s't/PS/J'=7q•rG r°• /w!, , h. If residential: Rumeer and type of housing units: �rC/ 87) :use Family Two iamb it Multiple Family Condominium Initial x t Ultimate x 1. If: Orientation ::tignoomood-city-aegional Estimated Emoloyment ' commercial Industrial J. !cul neignt of tallest -"'idled str'Ictjre •nes. 2. Masi mien natural masertal (La. rets. earth. etc.) will be rtnovod fns the site 0 teas 0 cite yards. ]. claw asany acres of vaeotation (trees, shrubs. ground coven) will be mw,ved from site crts. t. Will any mature forest (over 100 ears aid) or ocher lecsil lipprtant y Y y- wgauttan cue rtnprea 0 !mss prOjeCL? A yas ��a f. An there any pians for m-vegetation to replace that revolved during constriction! -Lyas _.I 6. If single phase .J omjtet: Anticipated period of construction +months. (including del litlenl. 7. If aaalti-ptosed project: a. Total nsa oor of phases hmtlei0atsdl)/A no. b. Anticipated date of coarenetmant phase :Fa11 mono 19fi7rar (tncludl+g flmml t scan l c. Approximate coaoletion date final pari, FalI ,entA1 990 .ear. d. Is ;has* 1 financially deoendawc an subseouent erases? yes —%3 )J/. 11. Wil blasting occur during csnstyuetiont _coma X No ' 9. Number of jobs genereted: during.constructian I�_; attar project is complete 1L. 10. huber of jabs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project reeuire relocation of any projects or facilittast Yes _Y 40. If yn, asoiaimt -- ' 12. a. Is surface or subsurface IlOufd waste disposal invelved7 X Tama 40. - •, ' b. If1jes. Indlcace type of waste (love". industrial, etc.) Sewaae C. If surface disposal nama of Strohm into which effluent will b' discharged 13. Will surface area ofexisting lase ponds., streams. bays or atriw surface watm:ays be Incressee or decreased by orvmsalt • yes IX hp. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plaint —y" �--'b i3. a. Does project Involve disposal of solid waste? _dyes _Me ' b. If yes. will an existing solid waste dismissal facility be used? X yes _43 C. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold : location cutchoaue ' d. 1111 any wastes not go into a sewage disposal Systole or into a sanitary landfill? _yes —�_vo 16. Will project use herbicides or pnaNcides? X yes Yb Lawns 17. Will project reuttnely produce Odors (Imre than one hour Der day)? _ yes Y ire 16. Will project produce operating mels* exceeding the local aratonce noise levels! _ Yes _X _Y0 19. 4111 project result In an Increase in energy use? X res _yo. If yes. Indicate tyvei,sl v"Y.C'CM/C%TY 20. If water supply Is from ..oils Indicate oumesng capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. local anttelnated water usage per may 6000Dais/ear. — j?0 22. Zoning! a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential /Anrirnitl'ro 0. Current: faecific zoning classiflcatton of site A _ Ronc,l donti a) /Anri rill �--,m C. !s or000sed use co-ssstrn- ..it, mresent zomtmc! Yr!S d. if mo. indicate desired xam,np _NL____•__ __ _•..____ t ' Zi. Aoomvals: a. ss any Federal permit required? _ Yat —X—ho 0. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financingl __Yes x NO c. local and Regional approvals: ' Aoormval seduind Submittal Aoorvval (Yes. he) (Type) (Oats) (Data) ' City. Tan. Village Board g 0 ill t� City. Tarn. Village Planning Board U t I V l 5 � City. Torn. Zoning Board _M7_ City. County Wealth Oeoartment "TisS7Mn • Other local agencies '7ES other regional agencies _Tm I Ig COCLU State Agencies 'IRS Federal Agencies T t C. 1NFOOrATIOhAL DETAIL , Attach any additional Informtion as my be needed to clarify your.project. If trier+ an or my be any adreno lematts associated with the proposal, please discuss sump tmaets and the 004sur" which Can be 1 tate" to eitigata or avoid FWAAMS SIGIATUBE: '� // TITLE: LKbt+> 5 f/2 E ".-Z tAE7IUMIhc: r� �Y74LL�"r Sv�iO/✓i3iU�J CAM a 1 1 , 1 � t 1 1 . 1 \ YOUNG %% YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE 1 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK cigor r 10.727-2.101 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX uta-727-0144 Pae6rrnnaL Engvrrr Vh Land 8--sym HOWARD W.YOUNc Landyoe 1 1 Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold 1 (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision 1 Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 1 1 1 Part 1 Item A -8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to ' elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. 1 Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a li--t of all Soil 1 Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 1 PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam 1 1 1 1 I 2 3 1 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impar Moderate Large Mitigated D Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Ch (Under Articles 15,24,25 of the Environmental Conser�(ats'on Law, ECL) 1 Examples that would apply to column I /)fir OYES • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ OYes I 1 • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ OYes I protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ OYes I 1 • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ OYes l • Other impacts: ❑ O ❑Yes l 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist i g r new body of water? NO OYES 1 Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water O O OYes I or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. O O (Dyes I • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes 1 S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO RYES 1 Exampks that would apply tq column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ OYes • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ - Lyes ' have approval to serve proposed.(project) action. llftts sac D" M/1VCP0 • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ OYes gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water O ❑ ❑Yes supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ OYes • liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently O ❑ OYes do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ []Yes day. • Proposed Action will likpl•• tau-t• siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ OYes 1 existing body of water w the tment that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical O O ❑Yes 1 products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water O O [Dyes and/or sewer services. 1 • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ O Oyes require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. 1 • Other impacts:—S11,1212 itl N rl= SniLS .'OA" �,r ❑ � XYes j;0/1 S r,n Sa2l1, rri^'V SYS/-77Yt4S Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface J water runoH? ONO OYES E:z nples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ O OYes ' 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact ' Moderate Large Mitigated = Impact Impact Project Cha, ' • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑ • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway.' J ❑ 0 ❑Yes Cl 0. impacts: ;"fir^,O•r •A•7 ,,-"—M, r7-M1/'— i ❑ lY ❑Yes ❑ ty[=T7•,•vY1 iKi.l(/rl JT'� ,^b:Ll �'CZ%L•i?.r•._ �� / t%'r /� / 1 r i ' IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO OYES ' Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ hour. ' • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ [Dyes E ' heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Dyes f _ to industrial use. ' • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I development within existing industrial areas. • Other Impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes L IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered ` species? ONO RYES Examples that Mould apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal O ❑ ❑Yes 1_ list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes L • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes f than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: 527',- Sum O.ZZM R-A"V 2S% G?c.-rr,/YJr/,.- ❑ Yes I i•rf�T r'.tJ /�rT?� r,�N� !'Ea'''ri c.I"i�.VPitl/j:i1.VS 0i= �,°,Z! tT 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-three a or Cnv�aY..: ' non-endangered species? ^0 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ Oyes L migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ' vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?. / ONO /XYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard. etc.) e ■ � Z S Small to Potential Can Impact - ' Moderate Large Mitigated o Impact Impact Project Char. t • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑! agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑Yes ' of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑P ' land management systems (e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping} or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) ' • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Of ' IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE' 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourcest O DYES (If necessary. use the Visual EAF Addendum in sc ion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑, or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑; t aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑; screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑. ' IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure o, f historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ZZN0 ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ' • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ ' project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Oyes ❑ ' IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or ' future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO YES { )The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity < ❑ ❑, Yes ❑ v r �.n. /c`t"i� Ya%=a r reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ Yes ❑ • Other impacts: 0 0 Yes 0 2 3 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potentia( Can Imp 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation s�st�ems? Moderate Large Mltlgat- nems DYES Impact Impact Project r_- t Examples that would apply to column 2 -- • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ' IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's so rc of fuel or energy supply? NO DYES ' Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ OYes any form of energy in the municipality. ' • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ O ❑Yes ' NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vtbra ' as a result of the Proposed Action? O DYES" Examples that would apply to column 2 / \\ • Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ OYes facility. ' • Odors will occur routinely (mora than one hour per day). _ _ ❑ O ❑Yes • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 0 _ ❑ ❑Yes ' ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a O ❑ OYes noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safe ?/ O DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ OYes substances(i.e.oil,pesticides.chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ OYes form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural O ❑ ❑Yes gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ OYes within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 0 13 ❑Yes t 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potentlal Can Impact OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated is. will proposed action affect the character of the exist'ngfommunity? Impact Impact Project Cha IINO OYES — — Examples that would apply to column 2 /1/ \ • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for Capital expenditures or operating seryices ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑ will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. — • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes • Proposed action will Cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes C • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I_ (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I 1 • Other impacts: ❑ ❑Yes I 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to ' potential adverse environmental impacts? X10 OYES If Any Action In Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or if You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact($) mitigated Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. ' 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project cl 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact ' • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 1 �, 1 t2. TEST HOLE DATA/SKETCH PLAN JUNE 13, 1989 LEGEND N PAVED ROAD A n SPOT ELEVATION + 29.36 O Q- 'o o, --32---- Lot 39 CONTOURS ' Lot 40 m U • .W WOODED AREA � N.64°38'720 E. 1 MARSH �.vaL°xo CREEK 24 07' TRIB. AREA BOUNDARY 11 Z - 4 '• YENNECOTT ENxEccrr1 11 5187 A N 28,7 SN_ YExxccorr OR I Suff. Co F11e No. O I n O I Park° I 0=�- -"`(ennecOtt Lot 41 £ N4 0 subdIVISO❑ 1 I Lot 42 I 27.22' , I Lot 43 P o o_ I zs w . ' �/ ro Lot 44 mN Lot' 45 i '`I c m_. _01 46 1123.63 \ 1 \ / , 2r; 53' y I I • ` I 1• TC,10o.- I+T2 a PIOy9r0und i9 es^ ; ', r.c.- ?1 o0 11 is park B 4 Iod' E . '1 IE.= 17.500 1 27 Sa ' - ''•28- N ��- `2��. EASEM Ia \-��0. 6' `€NT 16.159' - _. 1 23.Is32 sU5' 17, 43' 15.29. °no a � 25 21 m \ 17,FE ' to I'-- :a?5' . ao aY -- N •a .. _/r'LILC-0 E IC TRANS 1J aU' r 19.45' \ 1m I 9!0003 h.F. O I , +9a'oF le".Dac` + p.•e \ `1,uo ' • Z9 -------------- w IS61oN LINE ` ` I 90.600P d 55' 0. i >E' 23 l� o \ \ �h 2(x.33' .. w 1. P 3'30003.gF • o ea z20 Lot 47 j0 _ AJ I GRIT cHAM BER _ O8, Iq 1. U2' 2ZS2' BLO DIA• OL.P•' $' 9e 20 R) 16.>5' \ yCl O I � � �`2?� JJ . ':.PC_ .� 1 2 STs' .O X� 1> 7b' - r� OA 1 s ZA oti A'R •s DO 1'I O , •` �>.'r3' }1 1 .55' I I NI \ 11 i9 5�/'• Sy/ a �0 6 \`I ��0 22:J4 N.r '.,\ •/ 230oQF 4343 P VM1 W'r 23S 60 9 9�\ 2h /Ri \5^5.JOi 1 N N u, .L I 11L L CLW \ o S 'r\V/ O ur Q D� o N O N ------------ now - - Ilk o PROPOSE] '•� LOCATION MAP now or formerly 16. ,> . � ', 20.96' � - ' '-- ', -- �- - -_ - - 5 sy � SCALE 1 -soo \ 19.•27 ' 2 N 25 U3'` •-��,_ -�� �S 2 - X"5 Richard H! Wheeler 81 _ •R Z 169' 16 73 ru LOureen E Wheeler .N o - - 1E . •1 ' � \ Ir ; / lb:5i- �- \ 1 21 .4 .� \�m0 __ � _ _ 3•_ _ _��_ / / ic', s' fa9'Q LINE OF WETLANDS \ 11 •� ', /xJ1' 1 O` 1 . 4 ` / AS FLAGEED BY N.Y.S. DEC. e U1' 1 ? O \9P�, as _--' -----T1, LOCATED 6/1/89 �} e4 `3 00 qq 1E .75' • ,' 1 ' / ' ' T' O� 4 \ �\ h24•.^ 53' ..- �'•. L[ �_ 1 2 O1 a ` .4 19.65' ° �- ` , ° o> h° 1I, N� �, N s� SITE DATA _.._ 30.4a� Q ) .` Ao 2 0.` V 1 N m p � _ / 4r ' TEST MOLE WO.I 9 ` �6 x m '( ` / „ 65. \ Zed �0 . a S I. TOTAL AREA 50.0171 ACRES 11- ._n •v a4,3> ". :. 0 1r o 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT = A- RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL 19 79' 3�.' 15.50 r k d`' T'p N PC 28.99' '. 1 Z 3. NO. OF LOTS = 20 ILL 17 O�'CO P A G E \ _e.6 W H\' 9,56 ' � \ ; y mm 17 + p 4. LENGTH OF ROAD =i , 1 1910 FT. OPEN 1 �. �11� x'11, 5. AREA OF OPEN SPACE = 27*ACRES 1;46. 11 6. PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE 54% I '23. 13•' 1s`25. 9' C 1 .7r y S• 50'0 IE'D.00 ,POLOoo'/. p 20 20' \ LC 1 301 Sfi i1� 330 �_ P \ aIL SIL �' rl • 1 F`• 39 25 2 161 N �, 5.;2 . `0.F AFL REA" 'P hTD,au3+OG m w.+96 - 16 b2 •L.B N0.4 3 B <T E.• E4.31 I1E�23.86T.80 N n +o S 1 1 I qTA.0 a 28 0l `. 1 1 6 A ALT.TO - 2T 31 'S' 43000 + u 5.68°5T SO°W. 572.831 y 1� Qat Fo' �I L��,=PR 7 . s� rQ.F, A'o. '\ TRIB. 17 164' E' 1 p 1 � 8 28 s0 AREA ° '.yA} 111 �•-` 284 OTO'/ o.ry ar•G�- a Nl2O •TEST HOL�'Y ' , '1 O _ IBebG O.MP 0.600�. NO 2 OF 31 0��, 3 '• 600•• p0 19 45' 18.50' \ 12 1F sb' J / N '2 7e / a 2/ 33' 'If6p00 •eO F,� 9 x h/ 140' TT�c¢tT2 �- X20 16 ' ii. SOFI 6-6NOG TRIS. AE,. 24.2 GJTA.3100 2T9'OF 181 D.LLMP AgEA.27.63 1 ep '� r T.L.= 24 T4 m Q 996% NO.I N N r 19 SJ' /8 -1, 3 .-� LPA � _..-' '. \�� \ 1 l LE.° 21.OT � Dh �• \' / 1\ • ,,/ 4-B'-O PIA +t 4+ L.P'•1�- 2O 54' 11__ 2B'.- now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel - _"J �\ _ ° 61�0o N F- �; zso ao oa - mP� 14 15 1 n� _..9 O'b 21 rrF / 2a °' \\ d h T R O I 1\� '� c � ' 20 De' Av 4 •. Y o 3 I N � o_ h O N • aN moo P o' oo n I + N m ,SiS `� 1 � t Re' _ \ %CJ N Ka.U5• - I F O ✓p P,I P. 20.fi5 , ; a\ O /25.9a� : . t� Roo ;-26 .FI f �r200D 711J C� `NA'(ERM o s vA ' '• ^ `\ c '1 0 `v // 25.79 so, I EX1� 24. 1 ' IU, 4.05 h JTA.3+0o O \ a • Q ' \ 1�', c a � rc.=z4 T4 13 S Q, s•,(\/ ? r • LE.•21.2+F ''\,` 24.b7 N \` r O `I \ '1 .20.23' \/h .BP x /, a p . gp 4, Ih 28'0F16" 600 M.P. �' •.`33' PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP 23 38' \`s\, I O ss```u.J6'1 - y g20 tl�0.. F\ @ O.GPO•/. O \. \ Q g 0� 1 �. r 2 0 P `L, `\ g SAG•a\ m 6 O ON'%be 24.77' G6.59 PREPARED FOR A / O ': '1 111. •s / "" o @6 23 -5.'__° _ TEOT HOLE NO TEOJT HOLE NO.Z IIN 1`r 0 /, ^%may ° 2\ BAYBERRY ESTATES NOTE O.o D.o '1 O \` N\\ 23.2+ W' I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP OR.BROWN OR. DROWN ?i ^ - / A 4+ •tea 27 65' \ J to G' `\ O /r DIST. 1000 SECT.055 BL.09 LOT 0369038 LOAM LOAM o e I• \ ox \ e 75' PRO PO(0ED P1((iTER MAINZ DIST IDD9 SECT.035 BL.D� LOT DI O'B 1'11 7 3 ,t.r' 1 0�1 6 \'2133\ `E 23.3>• -- AT SO UT HOLD _ bKOWN BROWN N \E' �P 9 91LTY LJILTY 'L .�L D�OI'BN GJ112 14i �6 2\ \ \ •l 2. B.C.C.M.P INDICATES BITUMINOUS COATED CORRUGATED �iAND IOANO HPMs'P r. a I/e'` d' I I �� `T METAL PIPE. .� OOEP 2`.U1 l F o /� R O _ \ 29, 13' 24 2. GR\� D Pa t� 21.25' ` ` TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RED/BROWN RED/DROWN 12' P o \ \ P)ULDIIJG ENVELOPE (TYP) 3 PIPES CONNECTING LEACHING POOLS ARE I6° DIAMETER. O •I• ' / N 90 RQ-W 9I O /\ \ GOAR/'lE LOARNiE yOO 2a 1U' 4. ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED `OANP �JAND P. 2 A/ TRIB A \g1.681 • 23,33- _ SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y TO M.S.L.(N.G.V.D, - 1929) 9.2 3.4 OO,M 2h 50 A0� �1 ` \NST / 1 DROWN/GRY. GREYI/'JH IB D ' CLAY DROWN 9b OF 21 r CLAY \ cp LLAY 4.6 4.4 (WATER) \ OO \ `� QsvOANPY 19 U GRY/BROWN 20.9 24\62' G , r 21 .>91 'LAY Pa • - uu DROWN & - p ' e3.o3' p p:.�/_..,' 4 �OI�O tE OF NFW ` ,LOAR%E �JANPY %O RD.35' \ N ` ---------22 72' Y` N -�\ S,P O? r/iAND PLD CLAY Q. 's S S ' uwrw. ' T4(WATER) 85 O S. 21 .04' P\� OID 1 ° ills suever R n 1I -R o1 BROWN 0 m .• �' PALE DRN. _ �1PO + e varory Ivo,Or rm wrw mRx s*Air GOAR9E 9 a0' \ iO ourAnON P,w hAND LOAR/'JE 1 ') , 5 O JAND .� ..• 23. 1 ' •� _ 21.60' _ 06 -aREs of mis wnVFY NnY NOT 9nxwx 13,0 O 20.4U' 2U 79' Hr L1,EO .uIIIIOF�s II,M SIAL ox 13 0 r 22.52' FF WOx SEAL STALL NOT es CO14 I1.1FE _ OO (D, S�• ` o er + vnuo TmT coxr ' 4 \ 'O 95093 u .nen Ere Irmo-nrO HEnmN SNALL ION /x 23 b7' �Q , wLv EO THE VIFFON FOR whim RL sullen ,p 20. 4 Si JUNE 13, 1969 �frf+O LARD SU9aE+04 5, S'(0° MAY 4, 1967 s anexnxm, ANU OIF we eLnAlr ru IRE � - I DATE MAY I� 1987 YOUNG B YOUNG FILE COMPANI, FOVER,(MIP+IAL AGENCY I 23.sfi' SCALES I " = 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE ,RIVERHEAD, N.Y. euolNO 1rAST1Sur1ON ERVING INSIY 11110 HrxsoN, AN. I / _ IIIPN. GUARANTErs ARE NOI TRANSRIIA� N 1 N0. 85 -1482 LDE _ DUNG, NYS RE. 8 L.S LIC NO 12845 9 THr ASSIGNINS OF TIIE HOWARD W. YOUNG, NYS. L S. LIC. N0. 45693 Nu rN ��nmrn�• ^. = ncsnFwF ,A / ' _ 20.6 / ' 6' vo rI" N aP.r -. C3HEET I OF 2 5L � TA 4 Lot 39 0-0; Lot 40 \ U m Np \ `,Iei 59.86' • �` a 1 ^ LONA GREEN IZ ` 24.07' YENNECOTT I 34006 : 27.60' _26 GB ''sl D N 9 79' ' I I I" , Suff. Co. Flle No. 5187 , N N E o=o "Yennecott Park Lot 41 f ✓al° I Subdlvisan I I I Lot 42 z7.zz• o • / I Lot 43 4 \ X150 • ° I I Lot 4 zs.6o• O x now or formerly Lot 45 Z Yennecott Park Lot 46 I 1123.63 I •\ .,IB3' Owners QSSo. 43 2 000th E; 4 $ arty " 19.B9" Prof la ,"round I`, ro P Y °E . 11 27. 18' S `_ "Park & �t.1.6 200 I .a { N 26.97• ASI '26"" 'tel 1B1�25112� `"'�;LI91NG ENVE LOGE �TY V.� 220 �n 36.59' '1 23. 2' -' �+--'tom' 1� 4 op LILc° E26 `\27 O5• ° N rL 1].43' / ',\ 15.29• 1�,'7 •," �'j� LECTKIc TKA N9MIti'?IO`.1 LINBg IS 22 56' ``\ \ N `\ '- 25.21' -�-- 7 56' SJ 40' 39.45' m a0 ` 23%,00'v,, _Z4 `---- 2345 23hbOv` 1750' 89' 16.39' 19.78' 18. . Q Lspx Lot 47 o M LO1- 02 N; 16.78' / NS 1'2P 7�' ``` , -20 78',` o ' 17.78• / OPEN 5PA I m `� 19.61' 21 52' 'I -- \ 7.93' 1 9B• 28 ro 5 AGRB°i '\ ``, 19.94\` / N1 ° 22174'N,II '\ 1 AA.. 18.9e' 1B. 0' 5.70' 1 02' GS 0 -- 19.66 IIN , yy 39.`27 i „ ANDS G , ' f is'� 3. ' LOCATION MAP now or formerly 16.77' 1 20.96' Nlll \,,, `\ 26.24' - - _- 5_ N x ( pROpOis SE� SCA LEII° =600' Richard H. Wheeler 8 Z 64' 6.73' „pP 25,03' - O 25.5" 9 ° Loureen E. Wheeler ro o 16.41 ' �p` e I. II lV 23.4 _ is 7 .62 0' =o_ "__[ �\ e 14:A~6. '`, 27.89 I EA LOCATED 6/1/89 16 79'LINE OF WETLANDS 'E i I AS FLAG ED BY N.Y.S. DEC. a 01• IR4.9 30 \3tOdd-.5. iI 1 `, 25186' 5 2417!!1•.. -- , 53 ... ... -is 9.fi5' 17.78 // 2L S, 0 3 , 00 * 5F_ a (\'EL \\~1111/ \ ' 1 th 17.69• .46' 39.79' 3 IS.BO' F / A 16.97' �4•`37' 'E. A v •��// 104' 28.99' J. A 29. O 96 X r.JN 6.59' /• 'I 7 � 1 31. 34' ? 3,1000 ± .F '` ,' > NTS rN 6 GSR ,L� SITE DATA 1 .7, •23. 13`� \25.4! 20.20 a \ I 30. ' /N° 2�. 4° N' I. TOTAL AREA = 50.01711 AC. \ Z 36.46' `g \ / s Lo 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT - "R - 80" RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 'A' G i V,• 3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 1600 L.F. `'•,Se.e 1 v\ ' 4. TOTAL N0, OF LOTS = 18 39.Bs• a m CRy1� �� 139' ' Sa'gz660± %.F. U A .0 5. OPEN SPACE AREA = 33.9 AC S.88°5T 30°N! 572.83' Z S 21"eo• •'` 16. 1 IB 17. , I 1 S,y ^BJ o 1 , 1 Ol re O ' 1 , 31/,1`06• -` 200 c a 19.45. - 18.90' _ 16.59' EVO/2 2•/I. 2$.33 � 03 yJ ° i \% N \� N i 20. 16' `\ l 27 i . 19. 17• Q lT , /L�$ 16 `- 5.F Q 1 lD 1 y 20.94' 11 ' ^ :' 00• `\ . 33' 310605 `S;).r-, now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel 1 0 ._y60 O 24.05 N 20.08' . y •J 21.j76• \ A\ 40"", ly�/ `5„9j ` A 2' .86 2 •23. 1 I66at°J _-- D P ,28`79•' 1 G r.F5 4• 20.65' 0 „ f1' `\ EL `,/� ,�. I h 2 ..79• \I -_ 53 � AGREh 2'`. N II g' s. 2 67' - . CLUSTER " Er4.6 " \''� 20.VE 11. 35000 t �0.K p° 26.`33' 23.38' • 2" ' 34 i5 \ SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN \35y X70 26.59 , 1�8`LNA R6E ll�\6A91AI 21 ° .� 0005 N ' PREPARED FOR ' 23.99,'--- , NOTE : O O , 'I A6.30, . 121 1. 5' S % G/ ,,rpp 2D: L �\`` 25 37' 23.24 W BAYBERRY ESTATES 1. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP ?i ^' 27.e9• ` " `N 3.5 ` ZO° '� DIST. 1000 SECT.055 BL.24 LOT 055 Toa 4' bpd . ` , , i j ` 23. ' DIST. I000 SECT.05e aL.O! LOT of p r`p 1�. y`' 21 .7B• ` . 2ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. V J��.P ` =6' • 23. - ---- AT SOUTHOLD 24. 32 DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929). / .� 4 PpY•P� 26.03' 25' 14 23. 13' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD .d/1, \ \ /21.25' �` \ ` vp� 1' o. ,,rill 0 >Ne "�� l o 33' % SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y 21.871'. II \ o N E V o u LID 39. 0,`3300Q :t '0.F •o'"-I 20. O 4,.62' 21 J,9' �O • SE \\\V 83.09• Q • ► 111 3 �^ O 20.35• ' 4• '` 'O 22 72' ,,1LD w, o rxls suvvsv Is A vloAn°NAO< 21.04 -_-- --_--- q•!RP\y O� ``� iEGOGN nag Or ml Nl IOIE STATE O20. - - - * r DUCTION LAO 9 , '� 23. 11 , Z"GO Of THIS SAVE' .1 N°r OARING 7 � 20.40' 20.79' . � __- ' 21.E6' _ _ g79 ,NE ANA IUPVPVO@S IN.G SIAL GE22 5 2 1�NO ' , r¢f (5993 ...EI'D GLA6 EM-11N0' 'eE CG:GIUEEFL ` I^ N ,o THA VOL•YVUL CGry \ 0 \`j\�,HAN4i0 ONGICATYf1 HMEGN SHALL YLA // \ 7P `� ,/ U23.87' ]NLY To THE POISON I.WHOM IN, NUE.11 ,L 20.4 Ei0 Sf0 145p SIIA'1 4 MHEAMU, ANA ON HIS G HALL TO THE 1, 5?� DATE - OCT. 231 1989 YOUNG 8 YO NG ,mS corvANv, GOIO..ENIAL AGIKI AW / 23.56' SCALE : I " = 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, N.Y. ,M ING INSTITUTION LI9EU NIGEON, AIA , III THE AMIGNNS Of 61E LENDING MSTI, / rw°rL GUAAANIEEs Au NOT ranNsfEEAAED A N0. 85 -1482 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S PE e L S LIC NO 12845 r° AUomMAL INIT!T-1u1 nu alnsroUap „ • 22 .9 •, vO\`L HOWARD W YOUNG, N.YS L.S. LIC. NO.45893 20.6 / 7" 500 38 1 1 3. CRAMER, VOORHIS 6 ASSOCIATES REPORT FEBRUARY 19, 1991 Zli rO�� ✓G� 1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS �_ ~ ' Bennett Orlowski. Jr.. Chairman SCOTT L HARRIS Georgie Ritchie Latham. Jr. ~ I �S' Al Supercrnor Richard G. Ward �� 0� Stark S. McDonald �r�L gown Hall. "09i .Slain Rt ' Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. 6nr 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. Ne" 1'"rk 119' lelephnnc 15161 765.1919 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ' fax (5161 -6i-1823 March 8 , 1991 n r_ ••-• ;r-n Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street APR ' P.O. Box 493 River-head, New York 11901 u,u MARS. SLOANE & CONLON }/ RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 , 36 ' 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Board has received their environmental consultant ' s review of the above mentioned subdivision. A copy of the report is enclosed. The Board would like you to complete Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The consultant has suggested that access to Lot 11 be via a Private drive, so as to avoid the construction of the cul-de-sac for one house. Although the lot/road configuration may be revised after review of the Part III , you are still required to provide a tap road to the land now or formally of Edwin Mooney. Upon submission of the Long EAF Part III, it will be forwarded to the consultant for a cost estimate for the review. Payment must be submitted by your client before the Planning Board will authorize the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski , Jr. n, Chairman - s Encl. CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES _ ' ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS r; Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. February 15, 1991 Chairman ' Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 ' Southold, NY 11971 Re: Bayberry Estates SCI-M# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 ' 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: ' As per the your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and ' completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part II LEAF ■ The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall, we find this parcel to be extremely sensitive due to the presence of an extensive perched wetland system, and significant use of the site by area wildlife. We fully support the use of clustering as a means of reducing _- potential environmental impacts to these resources. Due to the extreme sensitivity of this parcel, we feel that the Board would benefit through the preparation of a L:rr1,, EAF Part III narrative discussing the existing environmental setting, the potential impacts of the project, and mitigation either presently reflected in the cluster plan, or additional means which could be employed to reduce environmental impacts. The Long EAF Part III would constitute additional information needed by the decision. making agency in support of the Determination of Significance, which the Planning Board is required to issue. The Long EAF Part III narrative could either be prepared by a consultant retained by the applicant, in which case the information presented should be reviewed by the Board (and/or consultant) for accuracy, or we would be pleased to prepare the narrative. The following is a brief synopsis of the basis for our findings: Environmental Resources The subject parcel is 50.0171 acres in size, and contains an area of freshwater wetlands as designated by the NYSDEC on 6-1-89, and reflected on project maps prepared Page 1 „14 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331 1455 1 tnayberry Estates Long EAF Review by Young & Young. The wetlands location has been reviewed by the Town of Southold ' Trustees, and is found to be accurate. Accordingly, if activity is located beyond 75 feet from these wetlands, the Trustees have no' jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the Planning Board is obligated to consider impacts upon the integrity and use of these wetlands and associated wildlife resources, as a result of increase in intensity of use in adjacent areas, and other potential impacts. ' The subject wetlands are identified as Palustrine wetlands, forested in Broad-leaved deciduous plants, and Seasonally Saturated, as indicated in the National Wetlands Inventorv. This classification is accurate with the exception of areas dominated by emergent vegetation within areas containing standing water. The wetlands support a significant amount of ' wildlife activity. The soils map was reviewed for information pertaining to the existence of these ' wetlands. Young & Young accurately identify the soils on site in the LEAF addendum. The wetlands is underlain with Canadice silt loam, which retains significant moisture. The soil survey also indicates that there are several intermittent streams associated with these wetlands. Intermittent streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 20 foot elevation in the western and north central area of the site. These areas are identified as "not crossable without tillage" and "unclassified". Inspection of the area surrounding the site, finds existing stream crossings in the vicinity of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Main Road (south of the site), and across Yennecott Drive, north of the site. The presence of flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained soils and intermittent streams identified in the Soil Survey on the site itself, strongly sugof gests designated derched stream or some wetl wetlands depicted ron the map.extensive Ac Accordingly this should be rched water condition, beyond onsidered ithe n the context of site use. The site also contains significant avian species, mammals and herptiles, in conjunction with wetland and overgrown field habitat. Great Blue Heron and raptors were identified in association with the wetland and adjacent areas. Common winter-resident avifauna were identified, as well as activities associated with fox, rabbit and deer. A high concentration of"gun shells" suggests an abundance of game on the site. The topography of the site is irregular; however, few areas contain steep slopes which pose a constraint. One area which should be given consideration is the depression to the southwest corner of the site (south of the isolated wetlands), which has slopes of up to 22 percent. Potential Impacts The yield plan appears to be feasible and provides a basis for eib�heen (18) clustered lots. The "cluster'plan is effective in preserving the entire wetlands and a 100 foot wetlands buffer. Further, there is significant upland open space buffer associated with the "cluster" plan, which we feel is essential. Potential impacts are substantially mitigated under the "cluster" plan through the preservation of 33.9 acres of land, or 68 percent of the site. We believe that the extreme sensitivity of this parcel as identified above warrants this subdivision concept. Given the CRAMER, VOORHIS &ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL:,AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS Pate 2 of 4 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review sensitivity of the site, the obligation of the Planning Board to take a "hard look" at the ' implications of a decision, and several issues raised above, we feel that the Board would benefit from the preparation of a LEAF Part III narrative. The following is an outline of issues which should be discussed. In addition, recommendations for preparation of documentation and possible design changes and mitigation is also included: ' IM_PACT DN LAND Construction on slopes of 15% or greater South recharge area should be strongly considered for a natural recharge basin. The temporary cul-de-sac encroaches on depression which could be used for natural recharge. Natural recharge concept and feasibility should be determined. Consideration could be given to accessing Lot 11 by private drive, in order to avoid ' constructing additional cul-de-sac for one house. Construction in an area containing intermittent stream and poor soils Perched stream conditions may be present in area of south recharge basin and Lot 11. ' Sanitary system functioning and hydrologic impacts should be considered. Test holes and/or lot relocation should be considered. ' IMPACT ON WATER Action requires use of a water source currently experiencing supply limitations Action appears to be within or near the franchise area of the Greenport Water District. Water availability from this source should be determined. Suitability of soils and subsoilsjor sanitary wastes Soil leachin limitations shou d be considered in the context of potential ground, surface and/or perched water impacts. Impact to intermittent stream and wetlands Use of southwest corner of site should be considered in the context of impacting natural drainage characteristics. Ih1PACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Site supports raptors, {reran, deer and herptiles, potential threatened species and species of special concern Habitats and wildlife should be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. I PA ON AGRICULTURAI LAND RESOURCES Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land Agricultural suitability of site, land use compatibility of agriculture and availability of alternate agricultural land should be considered. INI—PASS 2 OPEN PA E AND RECREATION Poteraial reduction of open space - Site open space resource and character should be identified as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. �\A CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL,AND. PLANNING CONSULTANTS Page 3 oro - � via/ ,:off Bayberry Estates ' Lung EAF Review I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to Provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. 2Very t y ' Very J. Voorhis enc: Part I/II LEAF CRAMER, VOORHIS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL,AND::PL&bWJ \,1�JG CONSULTANTS Page 4 of Y.iu 1 1 1 ■ ■ 8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES 8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES Wetlands, Audubon Society, by William A. Niering, Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. , Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, September 1989 Field Guide to North American Wildflower, Audubon Society, by Niering & Olmstead, Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY, Chanticleer Press Inc. NY, January 1988 ' Field Guide to North American Trees Eastern Region, Audubon Society, by Little, E.L. , Pub. Alfred A. Knopf Inc. NY, Chanticleer Press, NY, October 1988 ' Soil Survey of Suffolk County NY, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington DC, 1970 Munsell Soil Color Charts, Kollmorgen Instruments Corp. , Kollmorgen Inc. , Baltimore, MD, 1990 Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetland, by Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland ' Delineation, (USACOE, USEPA, USF&W, USDA Soil Conservation Service) Washington DC, 1989 National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands Northeast Region, by P.B. Reed, gr. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 1988 List of Protected Plants - NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY List of Protected Wildlife Species, NYSDEC Albany, NY Preliminary Freshwater Wetland Map, NYSDEC Region I, Stony Brook, NY The Field Guide to Wildlife Habitats of Eastern United States, by Janine Benyus Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, by Cook, Magraw Hill, 1990 Standards for Sewage Disposal Systems, Suffolk County Department of Health Services, Riverhead, NY, 1984 n%I�oa�ffaL�S'C�H PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS `A `M SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman z_ ,�' n '.. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 31� �y. {� Richard G. Ward ,1j°✓ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald � P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 10, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, December 9, 1991: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, as Lead Agency, make a determination of non-significance, and grant a Negative Declaration. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Upon receipt of the preliminary submission, the Planning Board will proceed with their review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very trulyyours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ems Chairman S�FFO(k ,cSi�O� , COG i O i >i PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y C,* i SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennet[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward l a -_ j3 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald " 1 P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 �Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN O OLD Fax (516) 765-1823 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance Determination of Significance Lead Agency: Planning Board of the Town of Southold Address: Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Date: December 9, 1991 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617, of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The lead agency has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement need not be prepared. Title of Action: Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Subdivision Southold, New York SEQR Status: Unlisted Action Project Description: The project which is the subject of this Determination, involves the subdivision of a 50.0171 acre parcel into 18 lots with areas of between 30,000 and 36,000 square feet. The proposal involves a cluster concept which results in the protection of approximately 33.9 acres of open space in the most sensitive areas of the site. SCTM Number: District 1000 - Section 055 - Block 06 -Lots 35, 36 District 1000 - Section 056 - Block 01 -Lot 01 Location: The site is located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 south of Yennecott Drive, Hamlet of Southold, Town of Southold, New York. Page 1 of 2 Major Subdivision-Matthews SEQR Determination Reasons Supporting This Determination: This determination is issued in full consideration of the criteria for determination of significance contained in 6 NYCRR Part 617.11, the Long Environmental Assessment Form Parts I and II, and the following specific reasons: 1) The subject property is zoned "R-80" allowing a yield based on lots of 80,000 square feet or greater. The use involves clustering 18 lots using the 80,000 square foot lot yield, onto lots of 30,000 to 36,000 square feet, allowing for the preservation of approximately 33.9 acres of open space, or 68 percent of the site. The site has been inspected for environmental resources, and it has been determined that the environmentally significant portions of the site are preserved within the open space area of the site, thereby minimizing significant environmental impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Protected site resources include, a wooded swamp, perched pond adjacent upland areas, steep slope areas, and contiguous open space including overgrown field and wooded habitats. 2) The proposed project conforms to the density standards for single family residential development established by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, in order to protect groundwater. The project is consistent with groundwater management guidelines as outlined in the 208 Study, SC Sanitary Code Article 6, and considered by the Town of Southold in review of the project. 3) A Part III Long EAF was utilized to evaluate the significance of impacts associated with impact on land,water, plants and animals, agricultural resources and open space. It was determined that the proposed project is consistent with environmental preservation objectives. Specific information concerning subsoil quality in the area of the recharge basin and on proposed lot will be evaluated through subdivision review. A natural recharge basin will be utilized to avoid excavation of clayey soils and create additional natural areas. For Further Information: Contact Person: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Town of Southold Planing Board Address: Town Hall, Main Road, Southold Phone No.: (516) 765-1938 Copies of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner-Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Office-New York State the Department of Environmental Conservation Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning Southold Town Trustees Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Page 2 ort VC/ CRAMER, V RM C1CiATES ENVIRONMENT 'C CONSULTANTS November 12, 1991 Mr. Bennett. Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Q P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 f Re: Bayberry Estates NOV ! 3 1991 scTM # 1000.55-6-35,36 --- ._ 1000-56.1-1 _ Dear Benny: We are in receipt of your authorization to proceed v:ith review of ti;e lr,)ng EAr Part 111,with regard to the ao<>vc, referenced project. `re r : a con #ictev ttlitia1 -ens;w, and at this time find that thea is one major concern =hien 'ns "( t Leen a'e� °tc€y addresser. This matter concerns water resources in The �ici ni' Of th; pro a3scd set Iia recharge basin and Ut 11 on the cluster plan. Tlae original revieYv prepared �iy CVA indicated trc following: "The wetlands is underlain with Canadicc sill loam,which retains signi6cnt moisture. The soil survey also indi:atcs that thcrc are several iatormiacnt s,rcams associai;;d with tl c; wetlands. Intcrmittrnt streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 2C foci clevad-on in the western and north central area of the sit,-. These areas arc identiticd as'not crossahie.without Olago" and"unciassificd". Inspection of thr, arca surrounding,ticsit--, finds existing stry am crosinss in the vicinity of Ilse interseetio:i of Laurel A4'CnUe and 14 in Road (sonih of the sito),.-1d a xo,,,>i e Pn�estt o r%v , north of the site. The prescncc of flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained soils and iricriniucnt streams identified in the Soil Surs•cy ora the site itsc'.f,strongly suggests a perched st(cam or some rainy extensive percl+ed water condition, be end the limits of designated wetlands depicted on the niap. Accordingly this sho�:id be co=nsidered in the content or site use." The presence of extensive perched water beneath aoriiott of the site 'particuiariy the recharge basin and Lot il),has not been considercfL Furth;; analysis tinX that the regional groundwater elevation is ,tpprc,airrtately 3+ fcct ,b(l e mean sea level (nSl), Test Borings conducted on site and depictc•.d on the Preiir"ins y SlIbUiViSiOn. 'Mlap Indicate perched water,present at. an elevation of ap proxirnatcta f3,6 felt al ve rns in both holes, Based upon This and p.rched steam activity south of ' cite, th�.rc. pot -ntial fat•pe=cked water beneath the recharge basin and Lot 11, which may lbe part of th s s;stein. Conse quently, should excavation occur for the recharge basin and the .art t aty system far Lot ot 11, the hydrology of this s✓stP.tn, including t;i4 ` i we!%I t ',tld be rtdverSeiy attccted. Additional test borings could be con>;idered in -he area of the rpchiaige basin and Lot 11 to determine t e praseiice and e'4vation cf T,�:c c,1 a_tt,:r Test bo inns Avould likely"silt- M" thereby rninimiz.na lo,, of perched water. An r-lt r sazl:e to ad'dido ! §t"1 bnrings would be to consider a rnod'(ied d s:bn.. Due to tee sr„all quantity of toad lwrfce vren, it may be 54.2 NORTH COUNTRY ROA.G, MILLER FLACE, NY 117C•4 (516) 331.1455 possible to use catch basins, and if necessary provide an overflC.0 to the s^uth end of the depression. A berm could be provided to create a closcd contour basic; for settling prior to overflow to wetlands. At least two inches of Storage should ba pro:idea, ur t?Fr modification would involve reducirg lot sizes to 36,000 swage t-et no.11711 .f tl'p main access road (and/or moving lots to east)}, in order to provide sufficient area for ,iocat on of I_„t 1 i to the area lust west of Lot 10, The road right-of-way, for a "tap" to the ad acent propert should be•provided and could be built if necessany; 1 : Iver. Lot 11 z 2 s' �A 6 .� Jess s private drive via a 280A variance until such time as the "tap" is necessary. Please review these concerns and calls to d;,,0 ,;s s--rne. 'f you are in ;agreement, the applicant should be contacted and notified of the ne.eu to revise the Long EtCF Part IN, or pprovide design modification. At this time we area satisfied xith other portions of the Part iII, and once the perched water issue is resolved, I believe we could provide a Determination of Significance. Tbank you for your atttenti0n to this matter, and pi ase .^.all if you have any questions. Very t y. J° VC-OrNS,CEP,A!'--P CRAMER, V SQCIATES ENVIRONMENT ` �` 'G CONSULTANTS o�os PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti + SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman y ® �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �J Richard G. Ward Ol �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Roa, Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 November S, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates and SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Messieurs Cramer and Voorhis: Under separate cover the Planning Board referred Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form to your office for review. The Planning Board has received the $500. 00 review fee from the applicant. Please proceed with your review. The purchase order will be sent to you under separate cover. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman A-Ir 5`1�(c9Fil� LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUOE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 316 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON PAX(616)EOE-1747 RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA November 7, 1991 Planning Board Office Town of Southold 15b" cLrck P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM #1000-55-6-35, 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find check of Francis D. O'Malley, MD payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $500.00 in payment of the fee of the environmental consultant's review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III relative to the above-referenced proposed subdivision. If you have any further needs at this time, please contact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosure Nov — 9 1991 SOUTHOLDTOWN PLANNING BOARD LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 510 232-1717 WALTER MAC LYN CONLON PAX(me)202-1747RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA November 6, 1991 Planning Board Office Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM #1000-55-6-35, 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Gentlemen: In furtherance of today's telephone conversation with Mr. Kassner, enclosed please find copy of your correspondence to me dated October 11, 1991. Please be advised that I did not receive this until November 4, 1991, nor did I receive the original of the letter dated August 6, 1991. It is noted that the address on both letters is incorrect. Please change your records to reflect that my current address is as follows: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. Mars, Sloane & Conlon 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 1178E Telephone 232-1717 Fax 232-1747 I have contacted my client who will be sending me the check in the amount of $500 payable to the Town of Southold for the fee of the environmental consultant's review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON ms Donald A. Rettaliata Enclosures IT 1�1 SOUTHOLD TC' PLANNING B• o��gUFFO(,�c 0 g� Gyp PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman CP �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 1 Richard G. Ward �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards pLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 11, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: On August 6, 1991, the Planning Board sent you a copy of their Environmental Consultant' s cost estimate for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. As of this date, the fee has not been submitted. The fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr/. l"t� Chairman e rD S . enc. NOV 1991 aRS, SLUANL s CQNLQM r , ��3UfFD( O PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 0� `; ��' C�C Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ! it `� Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very tr�ully' yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.// " S Chairman !/ enc. agZz . 0 QFFO(�-�� 9' G PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ( ,? SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman 5� �`�;? Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. c'� •3J� .a'�J �'r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 11, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: On August 6, 1991, the Planning Board sent you a copy of their Environmental Consultant' s cost estimate for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. As of this date, the fee has not been submitted. The fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, im'p's Chairman enc. o-9vD��i•�D(�r , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS a 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �, Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '1�'`e, :. . Richard G. Ward /�� �� �;°." Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonaldP.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Y PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500 . 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Cy�4��d&xkglv I }/�/j/J Bennett Orlowski, Jr.// " '�yyS Chairman !ll��� enc. C Su�3Fi� �osUl FOlit' /06 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W f;'• - SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. X00` Richard G. Ward Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Boz 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICESouthold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765.1823 July 26 , 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates west Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM{{ 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis : The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III. of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the Cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done . The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff . - 5 Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. The estimated review fee for this Long Ea.F is $500.00, inciuding the preparation of a Determination of 5ignfic3nce . please call if you have any questions, and/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. �p�11fF0(,�-C OG s PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS y Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman `YOB" �yC Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Q Richard G. Ward l 2 [ �Q Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 6, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates Laurel Avenue, Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $500.00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form, Part III, for the above mentioned subdivision. This fee must be paid in full be your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr.// " ' S Chairman ll// enc. �GFFOIAI P�3 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr, Richard G, Ward 1 It Town Hall. 53495 blain Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Boz 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-IR23 July 26 , 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM$ 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff . - 5 Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 4X Chairman enc. The estimated review fee for this Long EAF is $500.00, including the preparation of a Determinaticn of Signficance, Please call if you have any questions, and/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. 6-Z..q �o�gOFFO�,��Q PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. V Richard G. Ward J�[ �a Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 26 , 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, AUG - 7i99: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman enc. The estimated review fee for this Long EAF is $500.00, including the preparation of a Determination of Signficance. Please call if you have any questions//.���� d/or advis this office if you wish us to proceed. 9-Z-9 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. yy' Richard G. Ward ` '�✓. `p1� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 26, 1991 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAF Part III Bayberry Estates West Side of Laurel Avenue Southold SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 and 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Cramer and Mr. Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. �rnf Chairman enc. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review SCTM# 1000- Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr. , It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of 1990 should not exceed $ No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very truly yours, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates SuigFic� LAW OFFICES !S MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1]]0 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 510 232-1]1] RAYMOND G. PERINI WALTER MACLYN CONLON FAX(510)202-1747 MAU RfEN S.HOERG ER DONALD A.RETTA LIATA FRANCIS L.BOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA July 23 , 1991 Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM #1000-55-7-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Our File No. 12, 667 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find four (4) Long Environmental Assessment Form Part III - Evaluation of Impacts reports as requested in your letter of March 8, 1991, addressed to me. Please submit the enclosed to your consultant for its review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1: o- � Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosures .JUL 2 4 1091 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. "'' .� Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1018 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 March 8, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 R3yet ead, New York 11401 _ ® RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Board has received their environmental consultant' s review of the above mentioned subdivision. A copy of the report is enclosed. The Board would like you to complete Part III of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. The consultant has suggested that access to Lot 11 be via a private drive, so as to avoid the construction of the cul-de-sac for one house. Although the lot/road configuration may be revised after review of the Part III , you are still required to provide a tap road to the land now or formally of Edwin Mooney. Upon submission of the Long EAF Part III , it will be forwarded to the consultant for a cost estimate for the review. Payment must be submitted by your client before the Planning Board will authorize the review. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. G% 5 Chairman Encl. J16CI6106 CRAMER, VR OCIATES f'v° ENVIRONMENT _ G CONSULTANTS U55- i�.e4i-t. February 15, 1991 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 FEB 9 Re: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: As per the your request, we have completed apreliminary review of the above referenced project in accordance with our correspondence of October 11, 1990. Tasks and completed activities are identified as follows: 1. Review Part I LEAF The parcel has been field inspected by CVA, and the LEAF has been reviewed and amended as necessary. A copy of same is attached. 2. Prepare Part H LEAF The Part II LEAF checklist has been completed and is also attached. Additional information concerning our findings is included below. 3. Advise as Necessary The parcel has been inspected and environmental references concerning the site and area have been consulted. Overall,we find this parcel to be extremely sensitive due to the presence of an extensive perched wetland system, and significant use of the site by area wildlife. We fully support the use of clustering as a means of reducin& potential environmental impacts to these resources. Due to the extreme sensitivity of this parcel, we feel that the Board would benefit through the preparation of a Long EAF Part III narrative discussing the existing environmental setting, the potential impacts of the project, and mitigation either presently reflected in the cluster plan, or additional means which could be employed to reduce environmental impacts. The Lon& EAF Part III would constitute additional information needed by the decision- making agency in support of the Determination of Significance,which the Planning Board is required to issue. The Long EAF Part III narrative could either be prepared by a consultant retained by the applicant, in which case the information presented should be reviewed by the Board (and/or consultant) for accuracy, or we would be pleased to prepare the narrative. The following is a brief synopsis of the basis for our findings: Environmental Resources The subject parcel is 50.0171 acres in size, and contains an area of freshwater wetlands as designated by the NYSDEC on 6-1-89, and reflected on project maps prepared Page 1 or 4 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331-1455 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review by Young& Young. The wetlands location has been reviewed by the Town of Southold Trustees, and is found to be accurate. Accordingly, if activity is located beyond 75 feet from these wetlands, the Trustees have no further jurisdiction. Nevertheless, the Planning Board is obligated to consider impacts upon the integrity and use of these wetlands and associated wildlife resources, as a result of increase in intensity of use in adjacent areas, and other potential impacts. The subject wetlands are identified as Palustrine wetlands, forested in Broad-leaved deciduous plants, and Seasonally Saturated, as indicated in the National Wetlands Inventory. This classification is accurate with the exception of areas dominated b emergent vegetation within areas containing standing water. The wetlands support a significant amount of wildlife activity. The soils map was reviewed for information pertaining to the existence of these wetlands. Young& Young accurately identify the soils on site in the LEAF addendum. The wetlands is underlain with Canadice silt loam,which retains significant moisture. The soil survey also indicates that there are several intermittent streams associated with these wetlands. Intermittent streams are located within the wetlands and in areas below 20 foot elevation in the western and north central area of the site. These areas are identified as "not crossable without tillage" and "unclassified". Inspection of the area surrounding the site, finds existing stream crossings in the vicinity of the intersection of Laurel Avenue and Main Road (south of the site), and across Yennecott Drive, north of the site. The presence of flowing surface water streams north and south of the site, coupled with the poorly drained soils and intermittent streams identified in the Soil Survey on the site itself, strongly suggests a perched stream or some fairly extensive perched water condition, beyond the limits of designated wetlands depicted on the map. Accordingly this should be considered in the context of site use. The site also contains significant avian species, mammals and herptiles, in conjunction with wetland and overgrown field habitat. Great Blue Heron and raptors were identified in association with the wetland and adjacent areas. Common winter-resident avifauna were identified, as well as activities associated with fox, rabbit and deer. A high concentration of"gun shells" suggests an abundance of game on the site. The topography of the site is irregular; however, few areas contain steep slopes which pose a constraint. One area which should be given consideration is the depression in the southwest comer of the site (south of the isolated wetlands),which has slopes of up to 22 percent. Potential Impacts The yield plan appears to be feasible, and provides a basis for eighteen 18) clustered lots. The "cluster"plan is effective in preserving the entire wetlands and a 100 foot wetlands buffer. Further, there is significant upland open space buffer associated with the "cluster" plan,which we feel is essential. Potential impacts are substantially mitigated under the 'bluster"plan through the preservation of 33.9 acres of land, or 68 percent of the site. We believe that the extreme sensitivity of this parcel as identified above warrants this subdivision concept. Given the CRAMER, VSOCIATES page z ora ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review sensitivity of the site, the obligation of the Planning Board to take a "hard look" at the implications of a decision, and several issues raised above,we feel that the Board would benefit from the preparation of a LEAF Part III narrative. The following is an outline of issues which should be discussed. In addition, recommendations for preparation of documentation and possible design changes and mitigation is also included: IMPACT ON LAND Construction on slopes of 15%or greater South recharge area should be strongly considered for a natural recharge basin. The temporary cul-de-sac encroaches on depression which could be used for natural recharge. Natural recharge concept and feasibility should be determined. Consideration could be given to accessing Lot 11 y private drive, in order to avoid constructing additional cul-de-sac for one house. Construction in an area containing intermittent stream and poor soils Perched stream conditions may be present in area of south recharge basin and Lot 11. Sanitary system functioning and hydrologic impacts should be considered. Test holes and/or lot relocation should be considered. IMPACT ON WATER Action requires use of a water source currently experiencing supply limitations Action appears to be within or near the franchise area of the Greenport Water District. Water availability from this source should be determined. Suitability of soils and subsoilsfor sanitary wastes Soil leachinglimitations shoujd be considered in the context of potential ground, surface andor perched water impacts. Impact to intermittent stream and wetlands Use of southwest corner of site should be considered in the context of impacting natural drainage characteristics. MPA QN PLANTS AND ANIMALS Site supports raptors, heron, deer and herptiles,potential threatened species and species of special concern Habitats and wildlife should be characterized as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. MI PACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land Agricultural suitability of site, land use compatibility of agriculture and availability of alternate agricultural land should be considered. IMPACT 4Lv OPEN SPACE E1 D RECREATION Potential reduction of open space Site open space resource and character should be identified as support for maximum preservation of open space through clustering. CRAMER, VSOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 3of4 Bayberry Estates Long EAF Review I hope this letter provides the board with the information needed to continue review of this project. We would be pleased to Provide additional input upon request. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Very y arles J. Voorhis enc: Part I/H LEAF CRAMER, V5 SOCIATES ENVIRONMENT G CONSULTANTS Page 4 of APPENOIL A EAF ENYIRO.IMEHIAL ASSESSMENT 6D Project Informs Non NOTICE: This doCw— t 41es7"edl tf assist In determining whether the action proposed may have i significant effect On the Mvl•'C}IMrt. Please COMIste the entire pats Sheet. Answers to these auestlons will be Considered as Part of the adPllcaticn for SOPrval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional inferegtsdn you believe will be needed to coxclete PARTS 2 and 3. - Iinvolvet is "Oe s'" that Cbeelodon of the EAF will be deoendent on Inforemtton currently available and will not 20Indi nee studies, "searcfyeachh or ancesctaetten. If lnfarmattbn rlaulrine such additional work 1f unavailable, • se ted1GU and: specify each instance. 7ANE OF PROJECT: RAKE AND ADORESS OF OWNER (1f Differ•nts Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold New York am ADDRESS AND RAMS OF APPLIUM Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata , vu PN rmw 285 West Main Street Esq. 81131HIMS PHONE: 589-2500 reef Sayville, New York 11782 tr. uG p OESCRIPT1 M OF PPO.IECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) _ Realty Subdivisioh Dt= To. e)171 A_rk(Fs iN7o /,8 1075 K/i7N ,2-80 _O,Y 'S + St/Etoiv SiON �L126S 2j3 / TO 1",17r77n/ (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH "QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not appll5j►4) 33. 9 *C e-ISS OF / i� OPtsYv Sf' 'Cr A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall Project, both developed and underladW areas) 1. GTrel character of the land: k 6 511Y uniform slope __ Centrally uneven and rllina or lrrtgular 2. Present land use. Organ Industrial , Co�erdal v-iaoorellF•-1C: Rural , Fens —, Agriculture .,_7jt_hor _L.FGw-.._iT• �- 3. Total acreage Of Project arts: 50 acrn. Aeoralmata acreage: Presently After Comittton Presently After Comlation Meadow or Srushland 39 acres 27. 11cres Hater Surface Area acres ac-+s Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetattd (rock, Aarlcultural Q acres Q_aers eirtn or fill) �_acrn 0_acres Metland (Freshwateor Roads, buildinas r Tectal as new Article, and other paved :a. :E or r•- L,) $ acres 8 Surface: 0 _acres Z �acrn __ __acres Other (indicate tyre) 0—acres 9. 1 acre, Lawn' a• •+hst is "edominant soli [yoe(s) on nroject site? Haven_Loam S' a tree Cher• oeuroct outcrvao,nas an +M ipct sl M? — t. "•aC is oeotn Ca oedract? N/A - -- 700.;'_(,n eetj 9S A. APproxima a perewitaae Of proposed project site with slaves: 0-10: ; IO-iii -S; Is: or greater �:. 4 7. 13 project cant]quog7 tow or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? - Yes x No E. What is the depth to the water table720 feet /Z W 27 F-7- its PC-az Yovsvtry YOt/.Nty 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist In the project area? Yes _J_NG 'VA C-?VDL/M 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is Identified as threatened or endangered - Yea x .taw according to - Identify each special P_4P70g_S -Zim�sYrgo^Birn� r°i:7YLt� PQ2 >�nr74-rc�+.a1n S'�A�Z 6s s osSy f!✓J/�/�. 2�»-rhViuia�yZ.� />LhcJK' 7^ 11. Are then any unique'ar unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, ether geological AAra SP6r_/6M formations - Yes X Na. (Oescrlbe ) OF- SPEZ/r}z 12. Is the RFoj/ct site resently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation C0MC&Z A1, area - Yes No. G-"t//,0�'VCL'— OF USC- .8Y /fuA>7caS /WO C/f/t dl2c,V U. Oo the prysent site offer or include scenic views or vistas kno.n to be important to the co~Ity? /AJ WL'T tl S -Lyme n ' 4.E67q- . la. Stream within or contiguous to project area: 'KOJ32- SMr`)•/-C- Z2 )1 �4M Fc%— Wd7t4rVKJS ,-10 A. Name of streams and name of river to which it 1s tributary NSA C20SStg s/7r�-- j(2/j iq sou)`)tE-0TS_ 777 rV0/LT1fuIEST Is. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: - a. Name NSA ; b. Sin (in acres) N/A 18. What Is the dominant land use and toning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of develacrent (e.g. 2 story). Oi GiJr riJn °RES/LtiyVTj i ( � )/ 7- S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage dove]coed: 0 acres initially; 11 .9 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 48_ 1 . d. Length of project, in miles: N/A if appropriate) a. If project Is an expansion of existing. Indicate Percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age N/A t developed acreage N/A f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 pnoosad : 40 9. Mali mum vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (upon completion of project) Ir //g M�AS/P�7}rC P•/�, ht�c. h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: 1 7'L7' / f o 7 87�. .re Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X Ultimate x 1. If: Orientation "elghbornood-City-Regional Estimated Employment !?< Commercial Industrial J. Total heignt of tallest •nnosea structure .f•�t. 2. Mow much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, ate.) will be remved from the site • 0 tons_• Cubic yards. 0. Mow, many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs. growd coven) will be m oved fret, site - crts. ♦. Will any natyre forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by tors project? ll Yes —No S. Am there any plans for m-vagetation to replace that received during construction? L—Yes _'.o 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction -�Lmnths, (including demiition). 7.• If salt.-phased project: a. Total numar of phases mtlelpatadN/A No. b. Anticipated date of epaweneaarnt phase Tall month 1987war (including dame t t1 on) c. Approximate,ccmo)ecion date final phase Fall monthl 990 year. d. Is phase i financially dependent can subsequent "Asa? —Yes _'a N/A S. Will blasting occur, during construction? yes X No 9. Neper of jobs generated: during.construction r ; after project is comltte 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this Project _. 11. Will project require relocation of any Projects or facilities? yes ­X—Nd. If yes. explain:;-; • 12. a. Is surface or subsurfan liquid waste disposal involved? X Ta b. Ifya. indicate type of waste (savage.; industrial. etc.) Sewage e. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will bt discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing lake Ponds.- stream. bays or Other surface w4tm.&Ys be Increased or decreased by proposal? .-Yli No. 14. is project or any portion of project located In the 100 year flood plain! yes -L—No IS. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? -1—yes -NO b. If yes. will an existing solid waste dlsnosal facility be used? X Yas 4 o •c. If yes, give name: T/0 Southold : location Cutchogue d. 1111 any wastes not go into a sewage disposal systm or Into a sanitary landfill? Tes L•ho 16. Will Project use herbicides or pniticides? X Yes _-Mo Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (rare than one hour per day)? _ its YNo 18. will project produce operating noise exceeding the local amience noise levels? -74s _X_to 19. 4111 Project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes —No. If yes• indicate types) G�L�G'ltie,7-y+ G.l's�,,,_Q/L�csh9-r?srz � 20. If water suooly Is from .ells Indicate oumo ing capacity N/A gals/minute. Z1, notal anticinated water usage per day 6000 gals/dav IN ri l 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential/Agriculture a b. Current soecific zoning classification of slte A - Re.5•identidl /Aoririiltnrn C. !s orcoosen use cc-sisten: � I to nresent zoniac' Yes d. It no. Indicate desired zomind _NL_•_-•____-•__•.____ 26. Approvals: A. Is any Federal permit required? _ Yes _X_NG b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? --Yes X Xo c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Aporoval (Yes. No) ((TT rnyppee)) (Date) (Date) ard pr ,City. To . Village City. Town, Village Pla Planning Board 2S Jl1D 1ST ju City. Ton. Zoning Board � ��� City. County Health Department Other,loeal agencies Ocher regional agencies t7pManni 9 COQJpI. State Agencies Federal Agencies -IV6- C. INFOIMTIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as�way be needed to clarify your protect. If then are or may be any &dyers* impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which an be atm to mitigate or avoid th ►REPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: �Y14f—L� �U/�!Q/✓�3iO�U DATE: U, ` -A- YOUNG 0& YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK ttgot 516-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727.0144 Pwbs*Umn l Enguw YF Land 8.vv ym HOWARD W.YOUNG Iand S�.wyos Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Ca 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam Part 2—PRAT IMPACTS AND THEIR MA&UDE Responsibility of lea/ Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and atterminations bee, reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2)does not mean that it is also necessarily significnN Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpl, asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold o magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples arc generally applicable throughout the State am for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples andlor tower thresholds may be appropriat- for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The Impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples arc illustrative an. have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of th impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshol is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART _ e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s)in the project to a small to moderat impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Th' must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND _ Moderate Large Mitigated By lRiipact Impact Pro)•ct Chang- 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the pro' srte? ONO AYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 .13 AYes ONO foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed / 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ OYes ONO 3 feet • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. 11 O OYes ONO • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within O O Oyes ONO 3 feet of existing ground surface. •-Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ O OYes ONO than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 O ❑ OYes ONO tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ OYes ONc • Construction in a designated floodway. O ❑ OYes ❑Nc • Other impacts CQA' gYxUC-Z70Ai iwt 41V 111204 Cna1 ❑ � 12YYes ❑Ng 7)47NlAlb ,A1rErZN177L=7lIT .s7i2EWM All/U P00lt SOILS 2. Will there bean effect ts. _ay unique or unusual land fogris found on the site?(i.e..cliffs,dunes,geological formations, etc.) NO OYES • Specific land forms: 0 0 Oyes ON. i 2 Small to Potential Can Impact as Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. O O Oyes ONO • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. O ❑ OYes ONO • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ OYes ONO •• Other impacts: 70��v 2 ❑ Oyes ONO to .- �AM f Mfnfl A/dy/ ��Atl1 /ZL`U•�,Lr/F _ IAT I/ IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? XNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ OYes ONO hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of O ❑ OYes ONO refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ OYes ONO heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ O Oyes ONO to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ OYes ONO development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: ❑ O OYes ONO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO . RYES Examples that Mould apply to column 2 ' • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal O O OYes ONO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ OYes ONO • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ OYes ONO than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ✓ S b t ❑ yes ❑No R�VQAs 0 242 rAA�J 2Ca°TiLG5 /2�'PrHL3/�fVS OF SNtZ! 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-three a or C non-endangered species? 0 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or O O OYes ONO migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ OYes ONO of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO �1 ES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ OYes ONO land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 t 2 - _ 3 Small to Potential Can Impact e IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Chang- (Under Articles 15,24, 2S of the Environmental ConserXaty'� Law, ECL) X10 OYES - — - --- - Examples that would apply to column 2 ' ` • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ O ❑Yes ONO • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a O ❑ OYes ONO protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. O O OYes ❑Ne • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ OYes ONc • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes ❑Nc 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected exist i g r new body of water? XO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water O ❑ OYes ❑Nc or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ O OYes ON, • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ne S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO )KYES Examples that would apply ti column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ Oyes ON.. • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not O ' X Y9.Yes ❑W have approval to;serve proposed.(project) action. Must" .86- -0M/A!(� • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ O OYes ON. gallons per minute pumping Capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ O OYes ON. supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. O ❑ OYes ON. • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ O OYes ON. do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per O O OYes ON. day. • Proposed Action will likel- cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ OYes ON existing body of water tv the ement that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ OYes ON products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ O OYes ON and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ OYes ON require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. • Other impacts: SviZUB U-rTY 42F snii-s 44-ft) c Lt - ❑ X XYes ON SOic S FO2 <'JaJ1 MZ cYS729M-K IJ¢. Will proposed action atter drainage flow or patterns, or surface J water runoff? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. L O 1 ❑ OYes Of 7 1 Z a Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ O Oyes ON* agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ OYes RXN0 of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural O O Ores ONO land management systems(e.g.. subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip croppingk Or create a need for such measures(e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: O ❑ Oyes ONO IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCE es 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resourc ? O OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in ec ion 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ OYes ONO or in sharp contrast to current surrounding (and use patterns, whether manmade or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ OYes ONO aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant O O Oyes ONO screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ OYes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structureof istoric, pre- historic or paleontological importance? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ O OYes ONO contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the O ❑ OYes ONo project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for O O OYes ONO archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ byes ONO IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ES ( )The petmO•arnent Dore losure of a future recreational opportun . O ❑ 2yes ONO Yakaswler r uct on of an open space important to the community. ❑ Wyes ONO • Other impacts: 0 0 13Yes ONO IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sxstgmsl Moderate Large Mitlpated By 781NO OYES Impact Impact ProJect tng Examples that would apply to column 2 / \ — — • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. O ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's soqc_5r of fuel or energy supply? NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibraticmas a result of the Proposed Action? �tJO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 / • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N= facility. • Odors will occur routinely(more than one hour per dayl _ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N_ • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local 13 .. ❑ ❑Yes ❑N_ ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Na noise screen. • Other impacts: O ❑ Dyes ON. IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safeV?/ O OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous O O ❑Yes ON. substances(i.e.oil,pesticides,chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any O ❑ ❑Yes ON. form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON. gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON- within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: 0 0 ❑Yes ON. 1 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Pot2 3 ential Can Impact Be , OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exis "11 ommunityt Impact Impact Project Change I 1iN0 OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 i • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ O OYes ONo ' project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services O O OYes ONO will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ O Oyes ONO • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. O O Oyes ONO • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures O O OYes ONO or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services O O OYes ONO (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ O OYes ONO • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ O OYes ONO • Other impacts: O O OYes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impaet(s) may b- mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) LAW OFFICES MARS, SLOANE & CONLON 1770 MOTOR PARKWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11768 FREDERICK M.MARS OF COUNSEL DAVID A.SLOANE 510 232-1717 WALTER MACLYN CONLON p�fele)¢D2„vov RAYMOND G.PERINI DONALD A.RETTALIATA MAUREEN S.HOERGER FRANCIS L.SOSCO THEODORE D.SKLAR AMEL R.MASSA STEVEN CELAURO February 1, 1991 Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Melissa Re: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Our File No. 12, 667 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find check of Francis D. O'Malley, M.D. in the amount of $400.00 payable to the Town of Southold representing the estimated cost of your environmental consultant to review Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, MARS, SLOANE & CONLON Donald A. Rettaliata ms Enclosure cc: Young & Young FM - Q iy9i o if air PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Ifts/O '; .:,: - Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �0 Richard G. Ward �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 25, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney At Law 285 West Main Street P.O. Box 493 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Enclosed please find a copy of the letter dated January 15, 1991. Please disregard the last sentence. The Planning Board took lead agency only. No determination was made. Consequently, no copy of a Negative Declaration was enclosed. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Valerie Scopazz D Town Planner Encl. cc: Howard Young �oc�vFFOIKCOGy�c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman v0 • -kc Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward ! Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman JAN 2 . i,-,91 YOUNG 4t YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE �C RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 119o1 J 618.727-2303 a ALDEN W.YOUNG PAX 518.727-0141 HOWARD W.YOUNG P.ofe"wnol Engines.v Land Suowyoe Lam &.Y" v January 21, 1991 Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. 1770 Motor Parkway Hauppauge, New York 11780 RE: BAYBERRY ESTATES at Southold, T/O Southold, New York (85-1482) Dear Don: Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter from the Town of Southold Planning Board dated January 15, 1991. A copy of the Negative Declaration was not enclosed. Very truly yours, A4- a,L4 Howard W. Young HWY/0 Encl. Ms. Melissa Spiro ,�12 b i991 FOLK�oGy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS o z Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman SCOTT L. HARRIS y� George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward ��O! lr O Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Kenneth L. Edwards P.O. Box 1179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, 6�atl 1 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. iYvrS Chairman JN 241991 'Y PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ''A Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward A Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 January 15, 1991 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM#1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 1991. Be it RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assume lead agency status on this unlisted action. As requested on October 19, 1990, the Planning Board awaits your client' s payment of the cost for review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours,veo-du Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS u s SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 47r Richard G. Wardl Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 19, 1990 Howard W. Young Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Young: The Planning Board has received a cost estimate of $400. 00 from their Environmental Consultant for review of Part I and Part II of the Long Environmental Assessment Form. This fee must be paid in full by your client prior to the Planning Board making any determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act. Upon submission of the above mentioned fee, the Planning Board will have the consultant proceed with his review. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. '705. Chairman enc. CRAMER, V CIATr,(S ENVIRONMENTALANDp�ANM,NG CONSULTANTS October 11, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Plannin Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Long Environmental Assessment Form Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 and 36 1000-56-1-1 Dear Benny: _ We are in receipt of your letter of September 25, 1890 requesting a cost estimate for services in connection with review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above project. This letter will provide a basis for completion of these services. We are pleased to be considered for this service. As you are aware we have considerable experience in determining the significance of actions, working with decision- making boards, and providing administrative support including preparation of documents for filing. In addition, we have the technical training and experience to address a multitude of issues and concerns. Services to be provided are as follows: 1. Rev;-,.V PArt I LEAF.- Field inspect parcel, determine accuracy of information provided and correct/initial as necessary. Z' Lrs2=LIr I_i LEM Complete Part II LEAF checklist, and use as a basis for providing further narrative on the importance, magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. 3' vis M 1\rccc_csssaarry, Bascd upon review and preparation of the LEAF,provide advice to the Planning Board regarding need for additional information(Part III LEAF, revised plans, agency coordination, etc.), and/or issuance of a Determination of Significance,if sufficient information is provided. We propose to complete these services for a fiat fee of$400.00. I hope this provides YOU with the information which the staff has requested. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time -please do not hesitate to call. Very tr cc: Valerie Scopaz ; Melissa Spiro 4s 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 CRAl'AER, VOOR1­415, ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND::PtANN.JNG CONSULTANTS October 11, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form Dear Benny: We have been requested to provide a proposal for review of Short Environmental Assessment Forms (SEAF), for projects which are generally not expected to be as significant as those requiring the preparation of a Long EAF. The Short EAF is a useful tool for review of such actions; however, the form must be completed in a manner which takes a 'Bard look" at the project and provides a 'reasoned elaboration"as a basis for a decision. These guidelines as well as the current Short Environmental Assessment Form itself,were developed by NYSDEC as a result of the H.O.M.E.S, v. New York State Urban Development Corporation decision (Su reme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department (July 13, 1979). Accordingly the present SEAF provides a basis for meeting these requirements as determined by case law. We are familiar with this form and have completed many reviews using the form as a Determination of Significance and a basis for decision. In completing the form for the Town of Southold in conjunction with recognized actions of minor environmental consequence, we propose to conduct a field inspection of each site, review Page 1 of the form for accuracy and correct as necessary, complete Page 2 of the form including reasoned elaboration of the potential environmental consequences, and advise the Town if the SEAF level of review is adequate, or if the Planning Board would benefit from further information. Under this scope of services, we can complete this level of review for a flat fee of $250.00 perpproject. I hope this provides you with the information which the staff has requested. would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time -please do not hesitate to call. Very t t{ly y rs, arles J. Voorhis cc: Valerie Scopaz Melissa Spiro 1 OCT 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 CI�AMEH, VO M�yNk / S661ATES ENVIRONMENTAL CiN� CONSULTANTS FAX TRANSMITTAL Fax Number (510) 531-0040 Date: zy : 7e-s i-Z= TO: From: --( - e (/Oen thS Re: T n alm / Number of Pages (including cover): If Lite Lotul trunsroittul is not received cull 1i1un6ar buluw. Comments: x� AeW yo we "?'aVVm i A.,V4 &/V" MG" ,� GNzG fiQJd A-S wwtr yov �� , / Z.ej S4 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 CRAMER, VOQRHI� $;,ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL AND,PtANMt G CONSULTANTS VIM r,e. October 2, 1990 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr, Chairman Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Environmental Planning Consulting Services Review of Long Environmental Assessment Form Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000.55-6.35 and 36 1000.56-1-1 Dear Benny: We are in receiptof your letter of September 25, 1990 requesting a cost estimate for services in connection with review of Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) for the above project. This letter will provide a basis for completion of these services. We are pleased to be considered for this service. As you are aware we have considerable experience in determining the signficance of actions, working with decision- making boards, and providing administrative support including preparation of documents for filing. Services to be provided are as follows: 1. Rfyiew Earl I LEAF: Field inspect parcel, determine accuracy of information provided and correct/initial as necessary. 2. Preys Patl II LEAF: Complete Part 11 LEAF checklist, and use as a basis for providing further narrative on the importance, magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. 3, Prepare Fur 1 .FAF' Prepare Part III LEAF narrative to discuss potential impacts identified in Part I1. We will analyze the yield map for conformance to code and SCDHS, NYSDEC requirements and provide a summary in the text. Narrative will be brief in discussing importance, magnitude and mitigation associated with a project. Narrative will provide a basis for the Determination of Significance. 4. P—raft Determination ,Qf Significance. Based upon Tasks 1 through 3, prepare a recommended Determination of Significance (Negative Declaration, Conditioned Negative Declaration, Positive Declaration). his document will be intended to fulfill the SEQR requirements providing reasons for the determination in the appropriate format for a Determination of Significance. Page 1 of 2 54 NORTH COUNTRY ROAD, MILLER PLACE, NY 11764 (516) 331.1455 • c r Environmental Planning Services Southold Planning Board We propose to complete these services based upon the following fee Schedule: Tluk Hours EQQ 1. Review E j LFAP anQ Tnspcct: 4.0 320.00 2. Prcp,arc Earl J1 LEAF: 1.0 80.00 3. Prepare Wr IIT LEAF, 3.5 300.00 4, Determination of Sisolfic nc^ 1.0 -$4.44 Not-to-Excccd 760.00 All fees are based upon a standard hourly rate of$80.00. In order to have the highest quality assurance, principals of the firm will prepare documentation. I hope this provides you with the information which the staff has requested. We believe it may also be beneficial to establish a contract agreement between the Town and our firm, with an established rate schedule for LEAF review, Draft EIS review, and Final EIS preparation, as well as other services which you may require. We would be pleased to discuss this matter with you at any time - please do not hesitate to call. Very tr ly Wy- rs/ �,G'TX� arles J. Voorhis cc: Valerie Scopaz Melissa Spiro -\� SOCIATES CRAMER, V R Puge 2 ort ENVIRONMENT AN X \� G CONSULTANTS PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS C ,'z: ^ • SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward �� ?� '� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 25, 1990 Cramer, Voorhis & Associates, Inc. Environmental and Planning Consultants 54 N. Country Road Miller Place, New York 11764 RE: Review of EAE Bayberry Estates . SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 & 1000-56-1-1 Dear Messrs. Cramer and Voorhis: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the Environmental Assessment Form for the above mentioned subdivision to your office for review. Please develop am estimate of what it will cost to undertake the review. Enclosed also are the Planning Board' s previous actions on the application. Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman 5 enc. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: EAF Review SCTM# 1000- Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr. , It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of 1990 should not exceed $ No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very truly yours, Cramer, Voorhis & Associates � Y New York State Department of Envir.,nma„tal Conservation Z5U6RL9- T A R Re: LEAD AGENCY COOitDINATION RESPONSF. Dear /iIf'• f/I+r o This letter responds to your communication of Aljai"[• /It) 19y0 regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State nvironmentai Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DBC Permits (if any) : DEC Contact Person: OAU, S, ^7 e r-C (l SEQR Classification: [ ] Type I Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: [X] DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. it DEC Needs addio__al f 1 ..,..Grm&tlen 1Ci Order t0 respo:id (Cr.c COmmeI?tS) . ( ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: ( ] see attached ( ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. Sincerely, c•c: (attach distribution list) s"`] TO: FILE FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 ; 56-1-1 DATE: August 16, 1990 Received telephone call from Jill Thorp, secretary for the Board of Trustees, indicating that the Trustees had no objection to the Planning Board taking Lead Agency. In addition, Jill mentioned that the Trustees had previously submitted a report to the Planning Board on the above mentioned subdivision. Il Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ? 1 '_^ ` SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 : Supervisor Southold, New Yorks ''+ �,' J Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 �� 1 Iw Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUV'S X41 1990 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental (E Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Da1�-W �J r�SACAes S- ro-n O-55 - h - 3 � 56 I i Requested ActionPS�I�✓r�! 6A) 50.0171 urrec, SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( )4 ) Unlisted Contact Person: rn21I1,5A S'D1rzo (516) -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. n3 Chairman cc: Bear e€--Appea-}s Board of Trustees Bui ld-i-ag=-Department Southold Town Board +rt Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services �KNYSDEC - Stony Brook NY9D€8 nlaany S.E. Dept ef Pubi : .. US • .T�....•—n�..� �,.�-p-of—Engineers N- Y—S Dept—.of Tr-ansportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies YOUNG %; YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE MS RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK zzgoz MAlZk- y 616-727-2:)03 J AL.DEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727.0144 Pmfessional Eng4uee 4F Land Sueveym HOWARD W.YOUNG Land Suawyor August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have Prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young H iv Y Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. YOUNG %; YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK tlgo] 2303 ALLEN W.YOUNG FAX](51(3-710-727-0IA9 Pwf68*i0rKa Engirwr Vf Land Surveyor HOWARD W.YOUNG Land Saeveyor Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PmC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam APPENDIX A EAF VIVIRONMENIAI ASSESSMENT - PART i Project lnfnnnatlon NOTICE: This doCiDAnt �• desrmed to assist In determining whether the action Proposed may have a significant effect an the envlrenaaet. Please cdmmlets the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as Dart Of the so011tatfon for apdroval and my be subject to further verification and Public review. Provide any additional fisformatldd you believe will be needed to Ooaolete PARTS 2 and S. It Is @:petted tnat COMICtldn Of the EAP will be deOendent on info Involve new studies, research Or nes tldatf on. If In nmtion currently oral Lble and x111 not so Indicate reauirino such additional wort Is unava Jsble. Indicate and: ipetlfy Nth instance. ;IANE Of DPO.IER: NAME AMD AOORESS OF OWNER (Tf Oiffer•nti Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue Southold New York awe ADDRESS AND RARE OF APPt(UNT: - _ tree-', ' — Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata� WLe (770 (Nae) Esq. 285 West Main Street �� PHONE: 589-2500 rear Sayville, New York 11782 (State) p DESCRIM M OF POWECT: (Briefly describe type Of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. 1f not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall Project, both develon" and undawlooed areas) 1.• freeral character of the land: Generally uniform Ila"'_ Generally uneven and roliina or irregular 2. Present land use. urban Industrial Coe.rrefal �, Suburoan X -, Rural Forest . Agriculture ,�_,�r '— �- 7. Total acreage of oroject area: 50 acres. Anoroafinata acreage: Presently After CoMitttoo Presently After COMIttlon Meadow or Brushland 39 acres 27.1acres Hater Surface Area 0 lcres 0 ae-ts Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegecated (rock. Agricultural 0 acres -D—acres Nrth or fill) O—acr" 0—acres Metland (Freshrecer Or Roads, bufldlnas Tidal As ner Articles And other paved E/, 2S or F.C.I.) 8 acres 8 surfAces 0_acres Z,Ldcrts _acres Other (Indicate tre) 0 acres 9. 1-acres Lawn' a. '+hat if -^dOMnAnt soil t'ma(s) on groject site? Haven Loam 5• a Cre there varocA outcro]olnot an +rn1P^_t sit-? Yes X_90 _---•_ — "at is -'Path :O bedrnc:? N/A U•ee — A- approximate percentage of proposed project site with stones: O-IO- 100!:; Ip-1St _L; 1SS or ?. is project contigucio to, or contain a buildinn or site listed an the National Register of Historic Places? _ Tel -L—NO t. What is the depth to the rater table?20-30feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? _Yes _L_No 10, Ooes project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is Identified as threatened or endangered - —Yes X .b, according to . Identify each species 11, an then any unlgue'or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other gadlogieil formations - yes XNa. (Oelpribe 1 12. 13 the project Site presently used by the Co. pity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - T ee �Ip, 13. Goes the D Yes Am:asent site offer or Include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the coewmity? � Ib il. Stream within or contiguous to project aria: None A. NO" of Streass and name of river to which it is tributary N/A iS. lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project amu a. Itasca N/A ; b. Site (in acres) N/A ig, What Is the dominant land use and toning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the sale of development (e.g. 2 story). !. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage devel coed: 0 acres Initially: 11 .9 acres ultimately. C- PrcJect acreage to remain undeveloped 4A_ 1 d. Length of project, in miles: N/A If appropriate) A. If project is an expansion of existing. Indicate percent of expansion proposed: building sauare foot- age N/A ; developed acreage N/A f, number of off-strrwt parting spaces existing 0 ; proposed ; 40 g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (uaon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: .ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X ultimate X 1. If: Orientation ::eignbornead-Clay-Regional Estimated Emoloyment Commercial Industrial J. Tc-al heignt of to;lest •ronpsed Str'lctAre fart. i 2. Now mach natural material (I.*. rock. earth. etc.) will be removed from the sit• . tons ,cubic yards. 0. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs. ground covers) will be re.ovM fraw site • Z$acret. a. Will any My r• fanst (over 100 yurs old) or other locally.l.gortant vegetation be rtmsved by tn+s Orojact. Xras a S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? L_Yes _ro 6. If single phase project: Anticieated Period of construction months. (inciudLp demelition). 7. If multl-phased project: A. Total number of phase anticipatod /A No. b. Anticipated date Of comeneement phase !Fal l month 1987vaar (including demolition) C. Avoroximate. completion date final Dans• Fal l month)990 Year. d. is phase 1 11 na*etal ly d•pendpt as subsequent "as"? �yes �he N/A • 6. Will blasting occur during construction} Yes X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during.construction r ; after project is Complete �. 10. Number of jabs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project reduire nlatation of any Projects or facilities? res _Na. If yes, explain:,� 12. a. Is surface or subsurfscs liquid waste disposal Involved? X Yes Nb. b. I , Indicate type of waste (save".: industrial. etc.) Sewage C. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will bt discharged N/A 17. Will surface area Of existing lakesX Ponds.'streaes. bays or other surface watMAYs he Increased or ' decreased by proposal? —Yes No. 14- Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood Plain? -Yes -1-40 IS. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? _Yes No b. If yes. will an existing solid vast* diiaosal facility be used? X Yes _o . •c. If yes. give name: T/0 Southold location Cutchogue d. Vill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or Into a sanitary landfill? ►e 1_140 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? X Yes -4o Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce odors (eon than one hour per day)? _ Ye y No 16- Will project produce operating moil* exceeding the local ambience moist levels? - '-yes _X—No 19. 4111 project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes _!b. If yes. Indlcate types) 20. If water suooly Is from wells Indicate oumpmg capacity N/A gals/minute. 21. ipul antitinated water usage per day 6000 oats/day. 22. Zoning: A. What is dominant toning classification of site? A — Residential/Agri ulture ti b. Current Specific zoning classification of site A - Re�,l dent aI /Aerirnitnro C. !s araoused use co-sloth: .It4 Present zoninq? Yes d. If no. Indicate desired zonmmo —N[=_._-•____--__.- ___- . 26. AporovaIs: a. Is any Federal permit reouired? _ Yes _x—ho b. Oates project Involve State or Federal funding or financing? .—Yes X No c. local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Aporoval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Dau) City. Town. Village Board `((eSLluster .City. Town. Village planning Boards City. Town. Zoning Board City. County Health Department 3UUUT41S1'0 Other.,local agencies —1'E'SUiL Other regional agencies Qj, g COfj)pl. State Agencies fit) Federal Agencies X10' C. INFORNATtONAL DETAILS Attack any additional information as my be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse Impacts associated with the proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: L rtt7 U L E a/L REPRESENTING: ¢G.LE �UhJ/-9/✓iJ/OaJ DATE: i ' 1 . i 1 V' .'.I-' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 1 _'' ` SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward ,A Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald �" P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 Kenneth F. Abbruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Major Subdivision of Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abbruzzo: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 1990 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity makes an initial determination of non-significance. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 23, 1989 . Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. mS Chairman -A =, 14S TRUSTEES p� : SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President } ,5�' ;. Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. ,�,, 'w �' P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM- Board of Trustees RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM #1000-55-6-35,36; 56-1-1 DATE: July 18, 1990 The N.Y.S.D.E.C. wetland line as depicted on this survey accurately depicts the freshwater wetland boundary as inspected by the southold Town Trustees. Operations upland more than 75' from this line do not require any further review from this Board. CC: CAC JMB: jt r o I.. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road Ln V Telephone _ .� P.O. Box 1179 (516) 765-1801 OOl Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: July 5, 1990 Re: Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,35 and 1000-56-1-1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. Map dated 2/2/90 ❑ Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary _Additional Comments: cc: Southold Town"Board of Trustees New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Addabb.- —dam NNW Re: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE &yierry E,r�q,s Dear /"-r- This letter responds to your communication of 4ojas-h /4y7 /5yv regarding lead agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State .�..'T rcrmcrtai l uality Ree^c:•✓ - SP,f R) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this project: DEC Permits (if any) : DEC Contact Person: QpU�� S• Y'1 o f� l SECZR Classification: [ ] Type I [K] Unlisted DEC Position: Based on the information provided: ;X] DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action, [ ] DEC wishes to assume lead agency status for this action . needs add:iio.. l information in crCler to ( ] DEC cannot be lead agency because it has no jurisdiction in this action. Comments: [ ] see attached [ ] none If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or discussion. !� Sincerely y,,� _ CC: (atta( h distribution list) I TO: FILE FROM: Melissa Spiro, Planning Staff RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35, 36 ; 56-1-1 DATE: August 16, 1990 Received telephone call from Jill Thorp, secretary for the Board of Trustees, indicating that the Trustees had no objection to the Planning Board taking Lead Agency. In addition, Jill mentioned that the Trustees had previously submitted a report to the Planning Board on the above mentioned subdivision. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Il SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York 'y � Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 r3 n Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Q AUV,� X41 1990 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. ' Project Name: iLAVCrIf F-SAOAes m Iroo- pis— h — 351, 36 CmA rcroo -56 i i Requested Action: " te5k h A Of /? gorao, rxfL (�UO� Io o/V 50.n#71 Qr'PS °c SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ( X ) Unlisted Contact Person: rn2diS5R S'P ,2o ( 516) -765-1938 41 to The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. rf Chairman cc: Board of Trustees Buil � n. Southold Town Board *,Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services ;KNYSDEC - Stony Brook S.G.��SDEG Alba Dept e€ Publie-Weeks N-8- Army GGrpEngineers NY-.S-.wept—of—T-r-ansportation * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies YOUNG %� YOUNG 5 e+ picE 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE - r(,t5 wL RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK z19of MI tk 516-727-2303 J ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 616-727A144 Pwfe"ioruL Er9irwr 93-Land Survey« HOWARD W.YOUNG Lard Surveyor August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, Howard W. Young x-WY ;:, Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. YOUNG %1 YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK uggt 518-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 516-727-0144 Aok.donal Engi B Land &m vym HOWARD W.YOUNG Land Suway,p Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Ca C 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Canadice silt loam �hRS APPENDIX A EAF ENVIRMIMENIAL ASSESSMENT 6D Prefect Tnfornu Hon ' NOTICE: This docionnt desiened to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant affect On the tnrlrcn~t. Pi Nie Goeplets the *"tire Data ShOtt. Answers to thele question$ will be Considered as Dart of the application for approval and my be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional infOrmetiOn YOU belleve rill be needed to coolatn PARTS 2 and 2. It Is eswcua test COMIOtiOn of 1216 EAF will be dapandent an information currently available and will not involve ar Studies, research Or investle4tin". if informationrequlrine such Additicoal tort is unaraatbla, 10 Indicate and:"OC'fy each instance. MANE Of PROJECT: NAM AND ADDRESS OF m mER (if Differenti Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue. Southold, New York `e ADMESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT: Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata , uu esae .. p 285 West Main Street Es4 ° 589-2500 nes Sayville, New York 11782 (state) p OESCRlPT10N Of P"JECT. (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - indiate N.A. if net applicable) i A. SITE OESCAIPTzoR (Physic" setting of Overall Project, both developed and undeveloped areas) 1. Urrel character of the land: Re arIlly uniform slope _ Gmurelly uneven and ratline or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial Agriculture ltner Comerrclal _, Supurean X -, Rural forest , �. � '�' —�- 7. Total Acreage of oroject Area• 50 earn. Aavroaimete acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After LOmoletion Meadow or Brushland 39 acres 27. "acres Nater Surface Area 0 acres 0 e-±s Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvegetated (rock, Agri cul tura) Q_ acres _acres eertn or fill) 0_aeres 0.._acres Q Hetiand (Freinwater or Roads. buildings Tidal as new Artlel es And other paved Of :A. ES or F.C.L.) $_acres -.Lacres SusurfacesIcres ZLAcris Other (Indicate type) 0 stns 9. 1 acres Lawn, A. vnet IS ^-Neoonunant Soti typa(S) an project site? Haven_Loam___ S. A cre t?er• bdrocm au[Cro]oing$ on A +rq lriL si V? Yef __V. No _-__•— — : ^at !s _corn ca bedrock? N/A •pec! 9;ll73 A. Approximate percent30e Of proposed oroject Site with slooeS: 0-las 100!: in-ISS _S; lSi or ! greater 7. Is project contiguis to, or contain a building or site Places? Yes listed on the National Register of Historic = X No a. what is the depth to the water table120-30feet 9. Do hunting or fishing Opportunities presently exist In the project areal yes _JL_Ne 10. Does project site contain any species Of plant Or anlmel life that 1s Identified as threatened or engendered - Yes X .10, according to • Identify each specie 11. Are there any anique'or unusual land tons on the project site? (I.e. Cliffs, dunes. ether geological foration$ - Yes X No. (Describe 1 12. Is the project siteco ,presently used by the eeasnity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are@ Yes ll. Ones the pre yes Asent site Offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? _ Yb 14. Strta n within or contiguous to project area: None A. Name of strame and name of rlver to which it is tributary N/A 15. lakes, ponds, wetland areas within Or contiguous to project area: a. Na,a N/A ; b, size (in acres) N/A 1a. what is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential. R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). a. PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 1. Physical dimensions and Scale of project (fill in di mansions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. project acreage develovad: 0 acres initially; 11 .9acres ultimately. C. Project Acreage to remain undeveloped RR_ 1 d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing. Indicate percent Of expansion proposed: building s0uart foot- age N/A developed Acreage N/A I. Number of off-street parting spaces existing 0 proposed : 40 9. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 2.5 (noon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housinq units: .re Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X Ultimate X 1. If: Orientation "eighbore004-City-Regional Estimated Enioloyment Commercial Industrial J. Total heignt of tallest ^rohOsec structure Feet. 2. Mor ouch Return' material (1.e. rack, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site 0 Gnu 0 .Cubic yards. 0. Now merry acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be moved from lite • 7,,$acrts. d. Mill any ostyre feast (over 100 years old) or other locally-iagdrtant vegetation be removed by this project? J( Yes _RQ S. An there any plans for ra-vegatatien to replace that removed during construction? - Yes _!w i. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction _-!%p nths. (including demolition), 7. If mutt.-phased project: a. Total number of phases antlNpatw /A Ne. b. Anticipated ate of caemeeeement phase 'Fal l imenth 1987va4r (includinq demolition) c. Approximate.completion ate final phase Fall nonth1990 race, d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseawnt chases? ryas _No N/A !. Will blasting occur during construction? —yes 2—NO 9. 'umber of jobs generated: duringconstruction 1 after project is complete �. 10. Nutter of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project re4uire relocation of any projects or facilities? res —I—%. If yes, explain:; 12. a. Is surface or subsurface Iipuid waste disposal involved? X res 4e. b. If�es, Indicatetype of Rasta (sa+age.; industrial, etc.) Sewage c. if surface disposal name of stream into which Onwent will ba discharged N/A 12. Will surface area df existing lake Ponds.Ponds••' stream. bays or other surface ratars:ays be increased or decreased by proposal? --yes -�No. la. Is project or any portion of project looted 1n the 100 year flood plain? —res -L_No 1S. a. 0003 project involve disposal of solid waste? -X-Yes Ne b. If yes, will an existing 30114 waste di snosal facility be used? X Yes No •c. If yes• give Ran■: T/0 Southold : location Cutchogue d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal systas or Into a sahlUry landfill? �es I—NO IS. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? X yes _Me Lawns 17. Will project routinely Produce odors (more than one hour per day)? _ yes �y No IS. Will project produce operating nail* exceeding the local ambience noise levels? _ las _X _No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes _'lo. If yes, IndltaG typa!s) 20. If rater suooly is from wells indicate oumoing capacity N/A gait/minute. 21. mous anticipated water usage per day 6000_a's/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominent toning classification of site? A - Residential/AariculturP b. Current specific Zoning classification of site A - Residential /Aerir!mittlrz C. !3 grpaa3ep use Ca'SiSLM notch present Zoning? Yes d. If no, indicate desired Zommna 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? _ /H —1—ho b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _was X Ne c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Dau) City. Town. Yill&" eland. . ,City. Torn. Y11Lge ►lannt� Board TTTIIITvii�eEEuU6USSSS__ City. Town. Zoning Board City. county Health Department $ other,loaal agencies other regional agencies 9 cow.. — State Agencies -ITT- Federal Agencies C. INf01rATI0NAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as.fey be needed to clarify Your PrdJeet. If then ars or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal. 01eue discuss such impacts and the measure which can be taken to mitigate or avoid (t�h/�.m. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: 'In4 L DATE: 6-14 r. EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMW - PART II Praiect Impacts and Their Magnitude General Information (fled Carefully) - In complezing tna form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily $14nificant. Any large effect amt be.evalusted in PART 3 to determine significance.- By identifying in or act in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. . - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of megnmtude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally abolicabie throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds. may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each nutation. - The nureer of examples par question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Rood Carefully) . A. Answer each of the 18 question in PART 2. Answer Yes if then will be a.1h effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answrs. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (colon 1 Or 2) to indicate the Octentisl size of the ieeact. if impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check colon 1. d. If reviewer has •doubt about the size of the impact teen consider the impact as ndtentially large and procatd to PART 3. (e. if a Potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a Change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response Indicates- that such A reduction Is not possible. 1 2. 3. SMFM ALL TO POTTAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT 1"ACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LANG NO YCS WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHARff TO 00 PROJECT SITE? Examples that would .Aeol; to Column 1 Any cmnstraction an sicpes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise her 100 foot of Ienatn), ar when the general slaves in the project area exceed 10t. Construction an Lana wnere the death to the water table if less than 3 feet. rOnstmctiOn of caved narking area far 1."n or mare vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exnased or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construct't" tnae viii continue for more than 1 veer or involve _ more than are 1"se or stage. Excavation for min•ng aurvoses that would remove more than 1,300 Z ans Cf natural r+iterial (i.e. rock or sail) per year. C0nst1jtti0n of any new sanitary landfrl L. r �. z. s. !.ILL 7n MY ENT IAL CA f"PACT 3E OERATE LAAOE AECIIM SY ?-PACT rMPAC7 eaDJEtT rFAH>% CORstraCLlOn in a designated floodway. Other Enacts: 2. WELL THERE 3E AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UNUSUAL LINO FnRM� e) FOUND ON n THE SITE? (i.e. cliff,. dunes. geological fot- (�./N`Jl tsons. etc.) Snecific land forms: (-PACT ON WATER O. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATE3 BODY OESIrAArEO AS .... M SM TES PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 2S of the Envir- 0 onm fttsl Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examples that Weuld Apply t0 Colum 2 Dmillind more than 107 CuOEc yards of material frve channel of A Protered stre". Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other Impacts• a. WELL PROJECT AFFECT A.NY HON-PROTECEO EXISTINA OR .4 S NO TE MY OF WATER? ............................................0 S Examcl-s that Would AgPIy to Calumn 2 A 102 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body _ Of -Ater Or Mm than A 10 acre fncrase Or decrease. I ' _�CanstrvetlaAti a body of rater that exceeds IO aces of surface area. Other Im acts: - S. 'a!LL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR r.OU.NO4ATER Opo n —7 YES Elaroles that would AOoiy rp Column 2 Pruett -111 nnuire a discharge Dlrmlt. _ mcui"I use of a SCur:e of water that does net nave 100ravAl :0 Serve Imeosed Aroiect. �- Rn;ec: +Iu:rss water suooly from wells -ftn neater :non eS 1a1!ans ter ninute ouroing caoaei:y. C:rs-rJc:tion or oceration causing any contamination Of s DIOIiC -ater sucoly system. pn;ec: -"11 Aeversely affect groundwater. .•du'd !"'uent .ill :e conveyed off the site to — I 'Iltles -nlch :resently 10 at sx1s: or have — .+ace!uate caoac:ty. °^:e:. rt!u!r•wg a vac!!"y :ha: would use -Ate !n Rus. i'1:a C`pn or :^,c "_ In 'S^ng lt.'a r;. a •• !Y • '.a ter to e -:_•.: ••at •re . .s In .;v•ous v ..a. C:n:rss:•.. +a Grl t ._. . _ :nf. rs1LL It PnTENTIAL CAR IIVACT EE OERATE URGE REDUCE) Gr (PACT I" 4cr PRIJECT CHANGE gther imaaets� _��_ 6. :ILLI. P74JCCT ALTER DRAINAGE FL70. ►4M-IS OR SURFACEMrat 10 TES RUMOR'? ........... ................... . 00 EsAAnle that "ould Amply to Colum 2 - ' Project would gado flood water flows. Project Is likely to cause Substantial erosion. Project Is Incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Other Impacts: _ l?VACr M1 AIR ISO TES T. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR M&M?...........................0 0 . Fxamoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will Induce 1.770 or Aon vehicle trips In any given �— hour. Project will result In the incineration of Asn thon 1 ton of refuse per hour. ►rojeet adssion rate of all contaainants will a,,' S .� . lbs. per hour or a nut source oradudinq An than 11 million BTU's pee hour. .� Other Insects. �^ w Two" OR of AV" Aho ARLM.a�S 110 TES R. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATEREO OR ERON FRED SPECIES? 00 - Esameles that Would Apply to Column 2 Rnduttld" of ore or mofe species listed on the Raw Tort or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. Removal of anv portion of a crltleal or slonificant wild. �. 1 IN hnbi tst. Aomlicatien of Pesticide or Ninbicide over mon than We* a vearotno- than foea_jwvwturai purposes. QC1tr Iroacts: 9. SILL PeOJECT SURSTA1TiALLY AFFECT HON-TWREAME0 OR NO TES ESOARr.EREO SPECIES? .......................................0 0 Esamele that Would Apply to Colurn 2 ProjKt mould substantially interfere ritn'an. resident or migratory fish or wildlife soecies. project reouires the rrnnwl of core than 1m. acres of - mature fewest (over ton yews in ane) or atter IocAliv Important vegetation. S.-ALL i0 °CTEI!i[AL CLS ("PACT/7E OERATE LARGE REDUCED IT f"PCi 1•n'•C. P1MJECT CP/R6E I`^ACT 01 T151'sL Orr+.RCE 10• DILL THE °P(VJFCT ur2CT vIE95, v?SIAS r.0 THE v!SDAL 'P) TES CHARACTER Of THE -FIV6nRumd)O OP.mM..ItT^. O mamas that t%uld APOIr to Column 2 An incoteat101e visual affect Caused by the lntro•uctimt _ Of new meterislS. Colors and/or forms 1n Contrast to the Surr0eed111t land3cm. A oreJect easily vis1D1/, not easily screenedrthat 1s OeriouslY difftrtnt from nthere around it. Project will result 1n the allpinatim Or major screening Of SeeniC vlss or rlStas known to be -� ,"portant to the area. Other im actse IWpACT On NItTORIC RESIRI t 11. WILL PONJECT II-SACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE Of HISTORIC. NO YES PRE -hMnOIC nR PALEONTOCICAL I?N'OPTANCE? ................* 0 Esameles that buld Acoly to Colum 2 IV} Preteet Occurine wholly or narcially within Or Contiguous _ to am f4c111ty or Site. listed On the National Resistor of histone slates. Anr :maact to an archeological site or fossil Dred located within the on act sit&. other liencts: IMPACT ON OP" SPACE S RECREATION 12. WILL THE PRt1JECT AFFECT THE OUANTITT OR DUALITY Of EXISTING NO YF.S OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU•IITSES?...... O O Esamelet that Would Acoly to Cal Wan 2 Me oernanent foreclosure of a future recreational omrtmlt?. - �• A uJOr reduction Of an Ocen $Oats lmourtant CO no canhunity. Other Imacts: 1404CT nh isAn5PgRTATTOA 17. :'ILL THERE SE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NO YES STSTEVS? Esamoles that Would Annly t0 Column 2 00 Alteration Of Present ]attem, Of movement Of neOOle and/or goods. Protect will result in severe traffic sroelems. other ImOacn: •R. SMALL Tn POTerTT.AL CAN IMPACT CE OERATE LARGE RFJYJCED BY IMPACT PgACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON E4ERGY ia. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR No TES ENERGYSUPPLY? ...........................................0 O ... Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 ' Project causing Greater than SS Increase in any forms of ..� energy used in moeicipality. ' Project requiring the creation or extension of as energy . transmission or supply system to serve more tun So finale or two family residences. Other impacts: . •�. "- IMPACT ON NOISE J i5. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS. NOISE. GLARE. VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? •••'OO Examples that Would Apply to Calumw 2 a. Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, seftool or other - sensitive facility. - -Mors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will produce operating noise exceedinn the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. . Project will rerave natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other Impacts: �. IMPACT ON HEALTH a HA?AROS M TES 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIEALTH AND SAFETY? ............ O Examoles that Nould Apply to Colon " 2 ' Project will cause a risk of exalosion or release of hazardous substances (I.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) In the event of accident or upset conditions, or More will be A chronic low level discharge or emission. _ Project that will result to the burial of "hazardous wastes' -- (I.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, I"Itatinge , Infectious. etc., Including wastes that are solid. smmi-solid. IIquid or contain gases.) Storage facilities for one million or more galinni of llouified natural gas or other liquids. ' other imoacts: .. LL M O;EN. AL L..A i" - t . . OERATi LARGE REDUCED By !?.PACT !EPIC. PROJECT C?,.SGE WPACT ON O2"M AND C4ARAC72 OF MI•!N!TY OR 6IElgp."unm0 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CNAPACTn AF THE EAISTIIIG 40 YES COYIRN(TY? ................................................0 O Exams It that Would Apply to Column 2 The Peoulation of the City, Town or VI11ag4 in which the project is located is Neely to grow by sore than !: of resident human Peoulation. The mu"idlPal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting servi les will Increase by acre than SS per year as a ' result of this Project. - 'dill involve any nerman.nt facility of a non-agricultural use in in agricultural district or remove melee agricultural lands from Cultivation. The Project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic Importance to the c911mNity. _ Development will lnduce in influx of a Particular age group with special needs. Project will set in important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or mm employees In one or mon businesses. Other Impacts: 110 YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? .......0 O _ Eaamales'that Would Apply to Colum 2 Elther government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed todosi Cion or rejected Cne Project or nave not been contacted. •- ObjCtions to the project from within the eommuni:v. IF .ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A Pw1TE;MAL LAME IPPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IPPACT, PROCEED TO PART j. . PORTIONS OF EAF CCIMPLEiEO FOR THIS PR0.jEC'T: OETERMINATION PART I PART It — PART 0 Upon review of the information ".Corded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 1) and considering botn the magnitude and Importance of each Imact. It Is nasonaoly determined that: PREPARE A 4EEtATiVS DECLARATION A. The project will result In no =Joe Impacts and, tner.fore. O Is one •Ili C:1 may not Ouse significant -amsce to t.".m envinmeent. 9. Al Chouen the project could gave a significant eefet: an the environment. :here +ill not be a significant effect in this ase pR!PARE A 'IErJT"1E 9EZ.ARAT:C11 a because the mitigation measures described in 7.'.:7 j lave been O Included as QAr- of the oro",ed project. C. The brojec: wilt result in one or met ma!or adverse impacts PREP'RE 20S:77S CM.'IATIJN PROCM WITH EIS that cornet pe reduced and may cause sinnificapt damage to O tle envinnment. late lima Lr% .•s::rsa.e .c'a: •+ -asc Agency im grata r, �: a.-rarer ;m' ea-en: •tor risnars:t L1 ti ead • •i C• APPL`IDIS 9 " SHOR? E:fV'I.RCIIM,T."iT,iL ASSESSMENT FORM : INS18 LIMON S c (a) In order to answer the questions in this short SAF is is assumed that the '"<' preparer will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studise, research ' or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question'has been answered Sas the project may be sigaiflaant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (c) If,all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? . . • . yes No 2. Will there be 'a major change to any unique or unusual land form found an the site? . • Yes No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect an an existing body of water? . • . • • . . . — Yee No L. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality? . . .. . . . . . . Tag No 3- Will project significantly effect drainage flow on adjacent sites? . . • . Yes No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? . . . . . . . . . Yea No 7. . Will project result in a major adverse effect an air quality? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Ias No 3. Will project have a major effect on visual char- actor haratter of the community or scenic views or vistas Whchm to be important to the community? . Yes No 4. Will project adversely impact any site or struct- ure of historic, pre-historic, or paleontological : importance or any site designated as a critical /// environmental area by a local agency? . Ies _ No /10. Will project have a major offset on existing or -- / future recreational opportunities? . Yes No / 11. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation - systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . yes No " / 12. Will project rer:lar'_y cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- ance as a result of the project's operation? Yes In " j 13. Will project have any impact an public health hor — safety? . . . . . . Yes No 14. Will project affect the existing comrmunit1 by / directly causing a growth in peraanen- pcpcia— tion of more than. 5 percent over a one—year period or have a rajcr negative effect on the / character of the community ar neignborh=od? . Sas Vc 15. Is inere public ecncra•rerry cones_rs-'& the pr-ject? Yes Pm.EP.MM'S SIGNATME E RZS G: 3 2 EVY2:7 � vn.E: . r Ear Ei1VIROUNENTAL ASSESSMENT - FART iII JVAU8 O:1 OF TAE CwrORTAVCE OF INRAC73 INFORMATION r - part S Is prepared If one or more Impact or effect Is considered to be potentially larva. - The amount of writing necessary to answer part 7 may be determined by answering the puestion: in briefly completing the Instructions below have I placed In this record sufficient Information to Iadiate the reasonableness of mv decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the foliwinq for each Impact or effect identified in Column 2 of part 2: 1. Briefly describe the Impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) haw the Impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large Impact by a pro- jeCt clange. 2. Based an the information available. decide If it Is reasonable to conclude that this Ireact is important to the minicivality (city, town or village) in which the project Is located. To Answer the question of Importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources cr values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impect or eff..ct - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the project Apply to this impact or effect. ( OETERrINATMN OF SIGIIFICANCE An action Is considered to be significant if: Me (or more) Impact Is determined to both lar"* and Its (their) consequence, based en the review above, Is Incortant. PART III STATE.IMs \ (Cgntinue on Attachments, as needed) •\ .II- Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form (Addendum to EAP) Applicant Name: Francis O'Malley Project Location: Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York Part I: Project Information (Applicant) 1. Is project continguous to, or contain a structure or archaeological site listed in the State/National Register of Historic Places? yes X no 2. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; 0-10% 100 %; 10-15% 15% or greater %. 3. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with the following drainage charac- teristics: well drained 80 %; moderately well drained 0 %; poorly drained 20 %. (Use the Soil Survey classifications for your county). 4. Has the land within the proposed project area been previously disturbed/altered (excavated, mined, landscaped, filled, utilities installed)? yes no X If yes, briefly describe each. 5. Ake there any buildings/structures built prior to 1940 and/or listed on the State Register of Historic Places within or adjacent to the proposed project area? yes no X If "yes", provide the following information for each building/structure (use attachments if needed): a.) type of structure (eg. house, outbuilding, barn, bridge, dam tunnel), b.) location, c.) approximate age. C M Photographs which illustrate the general nature of the project area can assist the environmental analyst in his/her review. Submittal of photos is optional and not a required component of the initial EAF. Part II: Evaluation (Environmental Analyst) 1. Archaeological Concerns a.) Is the proposed action within a circle or square identified on the OPRHP maps? yes no b.) Is the.-area under review apparently undisturbed9 yes no (Please contact CRS for assistance in evaluating disturbance.) c.) Will the proposed action include a physical disturbance of the area? yes no d.) Is the slope in the area less.than 15%?• yes no Unless on limestone/flint escarpments. If the answer is yes to all of the preceding questions, refer to the Cultural Resource Section. 2. Structural Concerns :Will the project alter the physical character or sightline of any building or structure built prior to 1940 or listed on the State/National Register of Historic Places? If "yes", refer to the Cultural Resource Section and provide photographs for each historic structure affected. Part III: Determination — Refered to the Cultural Resource Section for review. — No referral to the Cultural Resource Section. SHPA Review complete. Date Signature of Preparer DEC Permit Number DEC 3/85 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman '7 . :,;.✓ George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Supervisor Richard G. Ward '�� J1 Mark S. McDonald Town Hall, 53095 P.O. Box Main Road " Kenneth L. Edwards 179 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938_ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 14, 1990 Kenneth F. Abbruzzo Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Major Subdivision of Bayberry Estates SCTM# 1000-55-6-35 & 36 56-1-1 Dear Mr. Abbruzzo: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 13, 1990 . RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity makes an initial determination of non-significance. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board grant sketch approval on the map dated October 23, 1989. Sketch plan approval is conditional upon submission of preliminary maps within six months of the date of sketch approval, unless an extension of time is requested by the applicant, and granted by the Planning Board. The preliminary submission must include road profiles and drainage plans. These maps will be forwarded by the Planning Board to the Engineer for review. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. mS Chairman YOUNG 0& YOUNG :S(A d!�P CL- 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE A.f5 w"t�— RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK tugot Mkk(- "—ee _ 510-727-2303 '�3" ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 510-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Pmfemonal EngG 9F Land 8.vv yoc Lnnd. Soowym August 1, 1990 Town of Southold Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Att: Ms. Melissa Spiro Re: Bayberry Estates (Francis O'Malley) Southold, Town of Southold Dear Melissa: Pursuant to your inquiry, we have reviewed the depth of groundwater and the soil types at the above captioned site. We find no major discrepancies or errors in the Environmental Assessment Form but have prepared and are enclosing herewith an Addendum to the Environmental Assessment Form. Very truly yours, f�az.�criip� Howard W. Young HWY,�W Encl. cc: Donald A. Rettaliata, Esq. lnoq . YOUNG *0; YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK :Igor 618-727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG FAX 518-727-0144 HOWARD W.YOUNG Pookw:o ul Engvyao%PLnnd Sucveyoc La.d. o Bayberry Estates Southold Town of Southold (Francis O'Malley) Cluster Subdivision Addendum to Environmental Assessment Form August 1, 1990 Part 1 Item A 8 The elevation of groundwater is approximately 3 feet above mean sea level and since the ground elevations vary from elevation 15 to elevation 31, the depth of groundwater ranges from 12 feet to 27 feet. Perched water exists on the site at elevation 16. 5 more or less. Part 1 Item A 4 Although the predominant Soil Type is Haven Loam, a list of all Soil Types are as follows: HaB Haven loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes HaA Haven loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes PmB 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes, eroded PMC 3 Plymouth gravelly loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Ca Canadice silt loam TRUSTEES =v T SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President � Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. O� 1 � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM- Board of Trustees RE: Bayberry Estates, SCTM #1000-55-6-35,36; 56-1-1 DATE: July 18, 1990 The N.Y.S.D.E.C. wetland line as depicted on this survey accurately depicts the freshwater wetland boundary as inspected by the southold Town Trustees. Operations upland more than 75' from this line do not require any further review from this Board. cc: CAC JMB:jt r, JUL 1 8 M5 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone ® P.O. Box 1179 (516) 765-1801 � r��� Southold. New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: July 5, 1990 Re: Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,35 and 1000-56-1-1 The Conservation Advisory Council makes the following recommendation: The site appears to have no wetlands involved. R The wetlands sited on the map appear to correct. Map dated 2/2/90 F1Wetland appear to be involved. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Southold Town Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary. The survey is not correct. Wetlands need to be staked by the Southold Town Trustees. The map/survey has been transmitted to the Trustees for their comments and any staking they deem necessary _Additional Comments: 6 ICW tom," P� cc: Southold Town"Board of Trustees �� oS�FFOIKCOG� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road ;'' '_^ SCOTT L. HARRIS P.O. Boz 1179 0% Supervisor Southold, New York �3 a0 Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 � Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHO F�9 TO: John Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees W 919M �k1 FROM: Melissa Spiro oW -- - Planning Staff WDM, C;? DATE: March 16, 1990 RE: Subdivision Proposal for Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Attached please find a copy of the Standard subdivision map dated September 25, 1989, and the Cluster sketch plan dated October 23, 1989, for the above mentioned subdivision. A previous submission, with a different layout, was reviewed by both the Planning Board and the Town Trustees. A copy of your Board' s March 21, 1989 report is attached for your reference. Before the Planning Board makes a determination on the yield for the parcel, they would like your comments on the wetlands line which was flagged by the N.Y.S.D.E.0 and located on the map on June 1, 1989. Please note that although the Planning Board will be coordinating with your office pursuant to SEQRA, it would like your Board' s comments as to the location of the wetlands line as shown at this time. If at all possible, receipt of your comments by March 26th (the next Planning Board meeting) , would be appreciated. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you in advance for your assistance. enc. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road o r P.O. Box 1179 SCOTT L. HARRI. Southold, New York O� Supervisor 11971 Fax (516) 765-182_ Telephone (516) 765-1 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: John Bredemeyer, III r President, Board of Trustees FROM: Melissa Spiro 0% Planning Staff DATE: March 16, 1990 RE: Subdivision Proposal for Bayberry Estates (formerly Francis O'Malley) SCTM# 1000-55-6-35,36 1000-56-1-1 Attached please find a copy of the Standard subdivision map dated September 25, 1989, and the Cluster sketch plan dated October 23, 1989, for the above mentioned subdivision. A previous submission, with a different layout, was reviewed by both the Planning Board and the Town Trustees. A copy of your Board's March 21, 1989 report is attached for your reference. Before the Planning Board makes a determination on the yield for the parcel, they would like your comments on the wetlands line which was flagged b� the N.Y.S.D.E.0 and located on the map on June 1, 1989. Please note that although the Planning Board will be coordinating with your office pursuant to SEQRA, it would like your Board' s comments as to the location of the wetlands line as shown at this time. - If at all possible, receipt of your comments by March 26th (the next Planning Board meeting) , would be appreciated. Please let me know if you require any additional information. Thank you in advance for your assistance. enc. HENRY P. SMITH, JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III, President Ln John Bednoski, Jr. TELEPHON, �• � �"=, .� (516) 765-189 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President '` 31 i BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 - - Southold, New York 11971 March 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 RE: Bayberry Estates SCTM No 1000-56-1-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Transmitted herewith are comments regarding the above referenced project as requested by your Department as follows: 1. No drainage discharge into the wetlands. Discharge is to be made to man-made drainage areas and should have pre-treatment if passible. 2. Wetland line does not appear identified as to agency? The Trustees would like a Trustees/NYS DEC approved line with a 100 ' buffer minimum around same. 3 . Suggestions of the Southold Town Planning Dept. and the Suffolk County Dept, of Health Services, Office of Ecology, are well founded. Very truly yours, i . . John M. Bredemeyer, III President Board Of Town Trustees JMB:ip D A � - ;QCs ,IJP o �� HEDULE E YOUNG 4& YOUNG aoo OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK iiyot 616-7£7-2303 AMEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Poofeestonal Enqu+ 43-[.and Smrftym r,._. S.V). April 30, 1987 FRANCIS O'MALLEY (Realty subdivision) Laurel Avenue Southold, New York ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION UNIT PRICE ESTIMATE 1 . Road Excavation, Final Grade and Subgrade Construction 7000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 17,000.00 2. Roadway Pavement 5900 SY $ 9.00/SY $ 53, 100.00 3. Curbing 3850 LF $ 6.50/LF $ 24,830.00 4. Drainage Pipe 18" Diam. 1351 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 27 O20.00 24" Diam. 250 LF 25.00/LF/LF $--Q50.00 5. Drainage Structures a. Manholes -- -- -- b. Catch Basins IVF 117.00 VF 5,850.00 c. Concrete Walls 1500.00 EA 3,000.00 d. Leaching Basins IVF T-M- 07VF $ 2,040.0 e. Special Structures (Grit Chambers) 2 $ 1200.00/EA $ 2,400.00 6. Recharge Basins (Ponding Area) 6000 CY $ 2.50/CY $ 15,000.00 7. Screen Planting 100 $ 25.00/EA $ 2,500.00 8. Street Trees 31 $ 125.00/EA $ 3,825.00 9. Topsoil & Seeding a. Roadway Shoulder areas 4300 SY $ 2.00/SY $ 8,600.00 b. Ponding area slopes 5300--SY $--T-T6TSY $�IU,600.00 10. Traffic Signs 6 $ 100.00/EA $ 600.00 11 . Concrete Monuments 22 $ 50.00/EA $ 1 , 100.00 12. Telephone & Electric 1900 LF $ 20.00/LF $ 38,000.00 13. Water Main 1900 LF $ 25.00/LF $ 47,500.00 TOTAL $269,215.00 S CHISLE A . April 30, 1987 Description of entire parcel of land shown on a map entitled, "Preliminary Subdivision Map prepared for Francis O'Malley at Southold, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York". Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot No. 39 as shown on a certain realty subdivision map entitled "Yennecott Park" filed in the office of the Clerk of Suffolk County under File No. 5187, which corner is South 14° 04' 00" East 140.00 feet as measured along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue from the southerly line of Yennecott Drive, and running thence from said point of beginning southerly along the westerly line of Laurel Avenue the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) South 140 01 ' 20" East 994.86 feet, (2) South 120 45' 40" East 759.22 feet, (3) South 90 33' 00" East 6.06 feet to the land of the Long Island Rail Road; thence South 700 52' 00" West along the land of the Long Island Rail Road 808.25 feet to the land now or formerly of Edwin Mooney; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney, along the land of now or formerly of Patricia Ann Mooney and again along the land of now or formerly of Edwin Mooney the following courses and distances: ( 1 ) North 23° 30' 40" West 879.54 feet, (2) South 580 03' 00" West 167.82 feet to the land now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel ; thence northerly and westerly along the land of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and again northerly along the lands of now or formerly of Herbert R. Mandel and of now or formerly of Richard H. Wheeler and Laureen E. Wheeler the following courses and distances: ( 1) North 230 29' 30" West 259.06 feet, (2) South 880 57' 30" West 572.83 feet, (3) North 2° 33' 40" West 492.56 feet to the southeast corner of Lot No. 47 as shown on aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park"; thence northerly, easterly, again northerly and again easterly along the boundary lines of aforesaid map entitled, "Yennecott Park" the following courses and distances: ( 1) North 00 41 ' 50" East 183.53 feet, (2) North 83° 42' 00" East 1123.63 feet, (3) North 9° 30' 40" West 192.50 feet, (4) North 840 38' 30" East 459.86 feet to the point or place of beginning. UDLE D SunGard N.Y.B.T.U. Form 8002-20M —Bargain and ale Deed,a,irh C-.-..a "against Grantor's Aae_IndiviJual or Cor•a (single sheet) CONSULT YOUR LAWYER 111011! SIGNING THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD RR USED SY LAWYERS ONLY THIS INDENTURE, made the day of nineteen hundred and eighty BETWEEN FRANCIS D. O'MALLEY and PATRICIA O'MALLEY, both residing at 240 Secatogue Lane, West Islip, New York party of the first part,and party of the second part, WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever, ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State o? New York, known and designated as Lot on a certain map entitled, "Map of Bayberry Estates " and filed in the Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk on , 198 as Map No. BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the premises conveyed to the parties of the first part by deed of dated and recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk 's Office in Liber at page on DISTRICT 1000 SECTION BLOCK LOT TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever. AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid- eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indentpre so requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above written. IN PRESENCE OF: FRANCIS D. O'MALLEY PATRICIA O'MALLEY STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personally came personally came to nx• known to be the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the same. executed the same. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: On the day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me personally came personally came to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with sav that he resides at No. whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No. that he is the of that he'knows , the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that he to be the individual knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpora- execute the same; and that he, said witness, tion, and that he signed h name thereto by like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto. Wargain and #air 19reb WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION TITLE NO. BLOCK LOT TO COUNTY OR TOWN Recorded at Request of CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD FORM OF NEW YORK BOARD BF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Return by Mail to Distributed by CHICAGO 'I'IVIM INEFURANCE COMPANY Zip No. w U S 0 Q ID Z 0 W 0 U w z 0 W N K 0 1L U 6 N N ti W 7 OC W N W JUL 2#984 YOUNG 4F YOUNG aoo OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK ngoz 51&727-$9W ALDEN W. YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Pmf"Mio"EMM~9F Lana Suatym Land Sueveyor July 18, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Suffolk County Southold, New York, 11971 Re: FRANCIS O'MALLEY (85-1482-F) Dear Members of the Board: Enclosed herewith are six (6) prints of the Cluster Subdivision Sketch Plan. This plan has been amended in accordance with your resolution dated June 11 , 1986 to relocate the access road to this development. Based on the resolution we are proceeding with the Preliminary Subdivision Map. Very truly Iyours, �t Howard W. Young H /jet J En cc: Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata c�n1 DONALD A. RETTALIATA d{ffoancy and of Law 285 WEST MAIN STREET P.O. BOX 493 SAYVILLE, N.V. 11782 MAY 1987 518-589-2500 A 98 May 8, 1987 Ms . Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 Re: Map of Bayberry Estates Dear Ms. Schultze: Enclosed please find the following items all as to the application of Francis D. O'Malley and Patricia O'Malley for approval of the above plat. The papers enclosed are as follows : 1. Application in duplicate for approval of plat with annexed schedules 2 . Long Environmental Assessment form 3 . My escrow check payable to the Southold Town Clerk in the amount of $6,000 representing filing fee 4. 12 copies of the preliminary subdivision map If the enclosed meet your needs, please schedule this matter for a Planning Board hearing and contact me as to the date and any notification requirements to be done on my part. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, aG7 , DONALD A. RETTALIATA DAR:ms Enclosures APPENDIX A EAF EMYIRO:MMAL ASSESSMENT GD Project Information NOTICE: This ddcumont r• designed to &$list In deteraining whether the action Proposed ray have a significant effect OR the thvirtlVwnt. Pifase COaplete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these Questions will be considered as Dart of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional iafermtiOm you believe will be needed to c000letn PARTS 2 and S. It is expected Last toaoleti0e of t-40 EAF will be dependent on infdrtrtion Currently available and will not iNvelve new stadias, research or invtetioatioe. if Information renutring such Additional wort is ae4va4ble, $0 Indicate and specify tech instance. ,W OF PROJECT: MAK AND ADDRESS OF MMER (if Gifferentl Francis O'Malley Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York ADDRESS AN NAME OF AMICANT: rest — Francis O'Malley c/o Donald Rettaliata cat, p vrar Esq. 285 West Main Street @@NESS PHONE: 589-2500 Sayville, New York 11782 p OESCItIP1104 OF PQOJECT: (Briefly describe type of project or action) Realty Subdivision (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH i)OESTIM - Indicate N.A. i1 net applicable) i A. SITE OESCRt"JON (Physical setting of overall project, beth develomed and uedo loped ams) 1.. 60"1 character Of the land: 4~911y uniforms slope_ Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Presort land use: UrbanIndustrial _ . Camserein] �. Suburban X . Rural -, .FMilit:°, �. Agriculture �.�r ' 7. Total sereage of aroject area: 50 acres. Aouroxiwate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Cmiation Meadow or Brushland 39 acres 27. lacres Hater Surface Area 3 acres —Q.—ac-13 Forested 3 acres 3 acres Unvagetated (rock. earth or fill) acns -0_Acres Aari tvitural Q acres �_ecres Roads. buildings Hetland (Fres Mater or and other Paved Tidal as nor Articles surfaces A tris ��atreS 24, -aa or F.C.L.) 3 acres $ acres Other (indicate tre) 0-acres 9. 1 acrts Lawns a. vMt if -redominant soft tyce(s) an eroject site? Haven_Loam___ S. a =re ;ger- �-drotx autcro]ainas on 'Mirct Sit"? YRS --x .Ya �_•_-_ t �-at is -'*at" to Pedrack? N/A —(•n 'eeU A. Approximate percentage of or000sed orpject site with slopes: 0-105 100': IM-11t _-%. 15: or greater —%. 7. Is project contiguous to, or contain a building or site listed an the National Register of Historic ►Len? _ Yes d Ro S. what is the depth to tree water Lablo?20-30feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist In the project and _Yes 10. Does project site contain any $Pedes of plant Or animal life that is identified o jhreUerad or endangered - Yes U_b, according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms an the project site? (1.e. cliffs. dunes, ethe► 9melo9/u1 ) formations - Yn --L—No. (Describe 12. Is the project site,prnaw ently used by the aoeity or neighborMed as an OPen $Pace er recreetlpn area - Yes ,C ft. 15. Does the pTsent site offer Or include scenic views or vistas know to be 10"rtent to the cfafawity? _Yes _No 14. Strean within or contiguous to project area: None a. Nan of strew and name of river to which it is tributary N/A 15. Lakes. Ponds. Wetland areas within or contiguous to Project area: a, Rates N/A ; b. site (in acres) N/A Id. What is the dominant land use and toning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (2-9- single family residential, R-2) and the scale of develoomt (e.9. 2 itpry)• ' S. PRWICT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acr'fage owned by project sponsor 50 acres. b. Project acreage dewlaoed: 0 acre initially; 11 .9 acres ultimately. C. Project acreage to renin undeveloped 38_ 1 d. Length of project. in mites: N/A if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square teet- age N/A developed acreage N/A f. Number of off-street parting spaces existing 0 : proposed 40 g. Maxfaw vehicular tries g"Orated per hour 2.5 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Numeer and type of housing units: ;ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial X ultimate X i. tf: Orientation ':eighboreoOd-City-Regional Estimated Employment Commercial Industrial J. Total heignt of tallest �mnosed stn ctire ____felt. ON 2. Mor much natural material (I.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the Site tool 0 ..cubic yards. 3. Now many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground Coven) will be rtrove from site • 2,,$,acros. a. W11 any mture forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-impertant vegetation bt removed by this prefect? X yes 1b S. Are there any plans for ra-vegetation to replace that reserved during construction? X—Tes I. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including deeslttionl. I. If multi-phased project: a. Total number of ohases ahticipatsmi /A No. Is. Anticipated ate Of commencement phase 'Fal 1 month 1 987vear (inciemnq demolition) C. Approximate com ittion as final he,, Fall mmethl99�..r, d. Is phase t financially duo an subsequent Ohasts? pies _No N/A 6. Will blasting occur during construction? _�es X No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction X; after project is Complete �. 10. Number of jobs eliminate by this project 11. Wil project moire relocation of any projects or facilities? TMs Elie. If yes. "610,v 12. a. Is surfed or subsurface liquid vete disposal ievelved? X yes b. 1f44es. Indicate type of rests (sewage.; Industrial, etc.) Sewaae C. If surface disposal nam of Strome Into which effluent will k discharged N/A 13. Will surface area of existing IskesX pends,' Strauss. bays or other surfed waten:ays be Incensed or decreased by proposal? -—Yes No. U. Is project Or Spy portion of project located in the 100 year flood plains Yes -L—No iS. a. Does project Involve disposal of solid waste? -,—yes No III. If yes, will an existing solid waste diimsal facility be use? X yes Ne C. If yes. give now: T/0 Southold , location Cutchogue d. Vitt any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? lea 2_40 16. Will project use herbicides or pnticides? X yes —% Lawns 17. Will project routinely produce oars (more than one hoar per ay)? _ Yes Y,Ne 16. will proisct produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? les _X Elie 19. W11 project result In an increase in energy use? X yes .p. If yes, indicate tyce(s) 20. If water suooly is from walls indicate pumping capacity N/A gals/minutt. 21. local anticipated water usage per av 6000 Gals/day. 22. Zoning: a. What is dominant zoning classification of site? A - Residential/kriculture b. Current soecific zoning classification of site A - Residential /AQrirultiire c. is or000seo use co•sisten: .it.4 present zoninc? Yes d. If no, indicate desired zoning _NL_•__._____•_,_•____ .1. 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit reeuired? _ !� �_� X No b. Dees project involve State or Federal funding or finanaing2 _ Yes t. local and Regional approvals: Avvppeoval Roamired Submittal Approval (Yes. Rel (TYPO) (Date) (Date) City, Tern, Village Board .:�,�rn �� ,City, To , Village Planning Beard City, Torn, 2onBoard city,, County Health h apartornt Other legal agencies9 COW _ Ot1ar regional agenetes Stats Agencies Federal Agencies C. 111F0RIUTIDNAL DETAILS Attach any additional Information as may be needed to Clarify your PrOJOat. if the" are or may he any adWrse Impacts associated with the proposal. Please discuss such impacts and the aateawea 44ch col be taken to mitigate Or avoid th t.cA... r MpAREII'S Si6iMTURE: TITLE: AEIRESEIITIN6: DATE: d_ M N EAF ENVIRONMWAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project impacts and Their Magnitude General infhration (Oral Car-fully) - In completing the fore the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect rill be potentially large (column 2) does not Mass that it is also necessarily siglificant. Any large effect went be.eveluated in PART 3 to determine significance.- By Identifying an affect in colo n 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of sign('♦Mini that would trigger a response in column 2. The exaples are generally applicable thrpull put the State and for most situation. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds. my be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project. on each site. in each locality. will vary. Therefore. the examples have been offeree as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of exaples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Reed Carefully) . a. Answer each of the IS questions in PART 2. Answer In if there will be aM effect. If. Mayb,answers should be considered as In aswers. c. If answering Yes to a auestion then check the appropriate box (colon t or 2) to indicate the potential size of the faoact. If impact threshold equals or eacaeds any exople provided. dick colon 2.,, If Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example. Neck colon 1. d. if reviewer has doubt about the size of the Impact tw consider the impact as oetentially largb'bad 9 OCetd to PART 3. e. If a potentially targe impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than,large negnitude, place a Yes in coluen 3. A No response indicates- that Such A reduction I$ not pesEtble.^- SMIALL To POTtlff.M CAN-DO K MODERATE LARGE NIDOGEN Bf IMPACT IMPACT PQQJKT CHIUIM IMPACT ON LAND ran YCS WILL THERE BE An EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO 00 PROJECT SITE? Exavoles that would Aooly to Coluen 2 Any construction on slopes of 1S3 or greater, (13 foot rise nor 1W fact of lengtn), or where the general dopes in the project area exceed 100. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less _ than 3 feet. ronstruction of paved oarkino area rnr 1."! or more vehicles. Construction on Isnd where bedrock is exxsed or generally rtthin 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more than are phase Or stage. Excavation for m+n+ng nu"Oses that would remove more thin 1,000 tons cf natural msterial (i.e. rock or soil) ner year. Construction Of any new Sanitary landfrll. 5. 3. ^ALL Tn POTENTIAL CAN I-PACT SE fJERATE LARGE NEDUCE0 SY -L-PACT Imp CT ea !CT PANOE Construction in a designated floodway. Other Impacts: -- 2. WILL THERE SE AN EFFECT TO ANY UNIpUE OR UNIISWI VWIFn PNS V3 YES FOUND ON THE SITE? (i.e. ellffa, dunes, geological forme- IVH`J] tsons+ etc.) Specific land fours: IPPACT—ON WATER 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER. SOOT OESIGNATED AS .. M YES PROTECTEO? (Under Articles 15, ta, 2s of the Envir- O onmfltal Conservation Lar, E.C.L.) Exams les that Would Apply to Cal unm 2 _ Orodgina more than 100 cubic yards of material frame Channel Of a protected streaA. — Cdnstructldn in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. _ Other impacts: a. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXIST144 OR NEi NO YES MY OF WATERT ............................................0 O Examples that Would Apply to Calami 2 A1 increase or decrease in the surface area of any body Of water or more than a 10 acre increlse or decrease. _"`C4nstrvetIOff%1 a body of water tnat exceeds In acres of surface area. Other Ismacts: S. 'a'.LL PROJECT AFFECT a YES URFACE OR gA71190uATER DuaLITY' Exarmles that Nould Aaaly to Cal umn 2 O Prn;ec' will require a discharge permit. PM:ec' recui res Use Of a seur:e Of water that does not nave aoar"ai to serve 2nmed praiec:. 'ro:!Ct reauires a:e, suoaly from wells witn ,,water than AS 741!0ns ter minute num0rng pp.Ci+y. Corstruction :r ]aeration causing any cantaminatian of a acolic water suaoly s-,stem. 'ra;ec: will adversely affect gnundwaLe r. .':u'd eo.lvent will to conveyed off the site :C _ f at'I+ties •hlCh pr,,eMtly a0 at exist or have 'racecuate -ioic:ty. '':;ea 'eauir•,g a •acil'ty :oat would use wet.. 'n lscess :: Cr,r00 ;allons :er Ca.. °'- a-- "se'! :arse v!:at•an :r P^.• ^ . e „ Jr esa,; �:r., water :: tree exeee- area:a- :-er_ + _. an '-,.:us C:n:vas: t: 'a:5rV 1. 2A. PULL Te PettRrlAL Cut iVACT EE OERATE LARGE AEOIICQ OT 14PACT IMACT PROJECT CNAx6E 9tner Impacts, 6. WILL PROJECT ALTER DR4114AAC FL?i. MTTMNS OR SURFACE !MTER No YES inhere. ...................................................^^ xamnl that '!avid Amply to Column 2 Project would lmnade flood water flows. Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is intpepatlble r1N existieg drainage patterns. Other Inmates: (tIACT MI 410. no YES T. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR WX1177..........................0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2. Projekt will induce 1.9% or aero vehicle trips In my glvem .� raw. Project will result 1n the inelnaratlon of mare than 1 tem M Muse Per hour. _ Project emission rota of all contamidants will extend S lbs, mer hear or a host sours Producing Pere them 10 million BTU's pee hour. .� Other Impacts: IrsaeT ex Puxrt Axe ANtiMLe 40 YES 6. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY TIMEATENEO OR EeOAxxEI1E0 SPECIES? O Examples that Mould Apply to Column 2 .. Reduction of aha or non species listed on the Now York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or Pound a too site. .. Reamr41 of any Portia of a critical or sfaos tfict did- • '-- I I fo Mbi Cit. . A"lication of Pesticide or vabicide over more than Wet a yearother trier feragr.uwtural purposes. ,• OtNgr Irmacts: .� 9. WILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT MON-TNREATMEO OR0 S ENOWME0 SPECIES? ....................................... tamale that Would Apply to Colum 2 nwjett mould suostantially Interfere with an! resident or migratory fish or vildllfe species. ... Project nouires the rteoval of More than 1n. acres of mature forest (aver On years in ane) pr otntr locally important vegetation. SMALL M OOTENTIAL CA:1 IMACT/tE ` ERATE LARGE REDUCED qY I"P�CT I"r'ACT PRnJECT CM.4hrE I' ACT O'S :ISPiL OT!:%'RCE IO. DILL TME 0"JECT APPEC' VtrhS, vISTAS Ct Bif vTS14L W) YES CMARACTER Of THE DFIGNEORMMO OR CO--IIT. ............. 00 ExamIts that uouid Apply to Colum 2 _ An incomatible visual &/fact Caused by the intraouCtinn of new materials. Colors and/or Pones in Contrast to the surroundine landscape. A *reject easily visible, not easily scroened,that is obviously different frm athwrs around It. Project will result in the TiPination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be f"Ortallt to the area. Other ipacts'• IMPACT ON HI.tTORic RESOURC s 11. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE of HISTORIC. V YES PRE-HitTMIC NR PALEONTORICAL IMI'OKANCET ................0 V^ mow, camel that Nould Aaaly to Colurn 2 Project occurino wlglly or Mrtially within or contiqudo _ to MY faciltty or site listed on Ne National Reatster of historic places. My impact to an arohwlogtcal site or fossil bred located within the project site. other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE 8 RSCA ATIp 12. WILL THE PRMJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR DUALITY Of EXISTING NO YES OR PUrURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIOINL OPPWMITIEst...... 00 rambles that Would Aepiy to Colum 2 Toa Penanent foreclosure of a future recmttonal o**ortuat". _ _• A maJor reduction Of M 00" sOaCO Im0*rtAnt to the Comnity. Other Ideacts: y LW4C'. AN TAAMSPORTATIOJ II. "ILL TWERE SE An EFFECT ro EXISTSnC TRANSPORTATION No TES SYSTEwST ............................................... O O Eaam0les :mat Would Annlr to Column 2 Alteration of present patterns of reverent of neopit and/or goods. PrOJect will result it severe trsftic nroolems. other impacts: -9 1 2 SMALL m MTWM CAN IMPACT CE VIODEPTE LAME REDUCED BY IMPACT I'VACT PROJECT CMU KE iMPACT ON MGY la. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES MERRYSUPPLY? ...........................................0 O Eaanoles that Would APPiy to Column 2 Project causing oreater than SE increase in any form of energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an anergy trai= ssion or supply system to sent more than So single or two family residences. Other impacts: IMACT OR NOISE . 19. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE OOORS, NOISE. OLARS. YIBRATMN 40 YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PAOJECTT ....00 Examples that Would Apply to Colum 2 _ Blasting within i,SM feet of a hospital, school or other saneitiWe facility. 'Irders will occur routinely (More than one hour per day). �. Project will produce operating Raise exc adinn the '— local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Ether impacts: IMPACT OR HEALTH 6 iM?AROS M YES 16. 4ILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC IIGLTH AND SAFETY? ...........,..^O Examples that Would Apply to Colum 2 `) Project will cause a risk of ex7lmion or release of hazardous Substances (i.e. all. Pesticides. Chemicals, radiation, etc.) - .. In the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be A chronic low level discharge or emission. project that will result in the burial of 'hazardous wastes' (i.e. toxic, poisonous. highly reactive, radioactive. irritating, infectious, etc., including wastes that are solid. semi-solid, liquid or contain gases.) Storaee facilities for one million or more gallons of liouified natural gas or other liouids. other impacts: LL i1 P0icii. nL C4N iMPACT BE OERETE LARGE REDUCED BY !"ACT !Y.PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC7FR OF COMrdNITY 07, 'IE iGHPrpun�q 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTEs AF THE EXISTING 40 YES COMLNITY? ................................................0 0 Example that Would Apply to Column 2 _ The population of the City, Town or Village in which the _ Project is located is Iikeiy to grow by more tan S. of resident human Population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Will involve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural use in in agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. _ The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, —� structures or areas of historic Importance to the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age ' group with special needs. Project will set in important precedent for future projects. .� _ Project will relocate 15 or mmR emloyNs in One or ton businesses. Other Imaacts: �^ 40 VES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? ... .,.0 0 Examples that m t Would Apply to Colu2 0 Either government orcitizens of adjacent communities ' have expressed deposition at rejected the oroiact or neve mat been contacted. Objections to the nro.ject from within the community. IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDE!ITIFIED AS A F ENTIAL LARGE IPPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE "AGNMOE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART J. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART 1 -._ PART 11 _ PART D Upon review of the information "corded an this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and ]) and considering both tee magnitude and imeortance of Mach Itoact, it is reesoably determined that: PREPARE A MEhATIVE DECLARATION A. The project will result in no major ImoaCis and, therefore. O is one .nitro may not Cause significant Jamape to the environment. 5. Although the project could nave a significant effect an the envi momment, :here will not be a significant mffect in this case PREPARE A 'IMST'VE 1ECLARAT:014 a because Che mitigation measures described in 7b'' 7 have teen O included as oArt if the groedsed project. C. 'he project roll result in one or more ma!or adverse impacts pREP1RE 205:7:'IECORATiON PROCEED 71-A -IS ]Lt cannot to reduced and may cause sinmifiCAnt damage to the environment. ace aicna:�r.T,4::nsa.e •t'a: 'm _R: agenev .iispature if J..rsrer ,: . _rjn: -tm resncrs'Jle i"-- lr :e 'are : 'esZ-r5,:Tt :'a: ix aaC a-C, aPP=Mniz � SRORT WV1RONMElr AL Ay4SESSt4= FORM Nas-MTO 4�ONS: (a) In order to answer the questions in this short SAF is is assumed that the"0 prepares will use currently available information concerning the project and the likely impacts of the action. It is not expected that additional studies, research or other investigations will be undertaken. (b) If any question'has been answered Yes the project may be significant and a completed Environmental Assessment Form is necessary. (e) If all questions have been answered No it is likely that this project is not significant. (d) Environmental Assessment 1. Will project result in a large physical change to the project site or physically alter more than 10 acres of land? . . Yes No 2. Will there be a major change to any unique or unusual land form found an the site? . . . . . Yes No 3. Will project alter or have a large effect on an existing body of water? . . . . . . . . . Yes Me 4. Will project have a potentially large impact on groundwater quality? . . Yes No S. Will project significantly effect drainage flow an adjacent sites? • . . • • • • • • • • • Yea No 6. Will project affect any threatened or endangered plant or animal species? Yes No 7. . Will project result in a major adverse effect on air qual ty? . . . . . . . • • . . . _ Ten _ No S. Will project have a major effect an visual chair anter of the community or scenic views or vistas Whown to be important to the community? Yes No 4. W311 project adversely impact any site or struct. ure of historic, prehistoric, or paleontological e importance or any site designated as a critical environmental area by a local agency? . Yes No 10. Will project have a major effect an existing or future recreational opportunities? . . . Tom �� No U. Will project result in major traffic problems or cause a major effect to existing transportation systems? • • • • . • . . • • • • Yes No 12. Will project regularly cause objectionable odors, noise, glare, vibration, or electrical disturb- ance as a result of the project's operation? Yes No 13. Will pro+ect have any impact on public health or safety? . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes No 14. Will project iffect the existing community by directly causing a growth in permanent papula- tion of more than. 5 percent over a one-year period _r have a rajer negative effect on the character of the community or ne4gn:arhood? . . Yea No 15. Is ihers public ccntroverey concerning the prosect" Tee ac PRT_PAPZP'S SIGNATURE =Z REPRESE.YTING: Da:Sa 9/Vr8 r EAP ENVIRONpOTAL ASSESVW - PART III DAU O;1 OF TXE 4PORTME OF INPACT3 1RFOWMTION - Part 3 is Prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be Potentially lame. - The amount of writino necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: Inppri__eefft�yy completing the instrectiois below haw I placed in this record sufficient Infermetins to Indicate Lite— Msonabtehess of my decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Camplete the follgwinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Oeqeribe (if aeqlicabte) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than large impact by a Pro- Jett change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasaeqble to conclude that this impact is important to the pinitioality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To answer the question of Importance, consider- - The probability of the impact or effect occurring - The duration of the Impact or effect Its irrnorsibility, Including permanently lost resources er values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - its Potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the project apply to tnis Impact or effect. DETERMIIMTTON OF SI6NIFICA.MCE ( An action is eomidered to be significant If: hne (or more) impact is determined to both la_�and its (their) consequence, based an the review above, is impp nt. PAPT III STATEMMS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) Photographs which illustrate the general nature of the project area can assist the environmental analyst in his/her review. Submittal of photos is optional and not a required component of the initial EAF. Part IIs Evaluation (Environmental Analyst) 1. Archaeological Concerns a.) is the proposed action within a circle or square identified on the OPRHP maps? yes no b.) Is the area under review apparently undisturbed? yes no (Please contact CRS for assistance in evaluating disturbance.) c.) Will the proposed action include a physical disturbance of the area? yes no d.) Is the slope in the area less than 15%?' yes _ no ' Unless on limestone/flint escarpments. If the answer Is yes to all of the preceding questions, refer to the Cultural Resource Section. 2. Structural Concerns :Will the project alter the physical character or sightline of any building or structure built prior to 1940 or listed on the State/National Register of Historic Places? If "yes", refer to the Cultural Resource Section and provide photographs for each historic structure affected. Part III: Determination — Refered to the Cultural Resource Section for review. — No referral to the Cultural Resource Section. SHPA Review complete. it Signature of Preparer DEC Permit Number DEC 3/85 Structural-Archaeological Assessment Form (Addendum to EAP) Applicant Name..—Francis O'Malley Project Location: Laurel Avenue, Southold, New York Part I: Project information (Applicant) 1. Is project eontinguous to, or contain a structure or archaeological site listed in the State/National Register of Historic Places? yes X no Z..- 'Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes; 0-10% 100 %; 10-15% 15% or greater %. 3. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with the following drainage charac- teristics: well drained 80 ; moderately well drained 0 %; poorly drained 20 %. (Use the Soil Survey classifications for your county). 4. Has the land within the proposed project area been previously disturbed/altered (excavated, mined, landscaped, filled, utilities installed)? yes no X If yes, briefly describe each. 5. Aee there any buildings/structures built prior to 1940 and/or listed on the State Register of Historic Places within or adjacent to the proposed project area? yes no X If "yes", provide the following Information for each building/structure (use attachments if needed): a.)- type of structure (eg. house, outbuilding, barn, bridge, dam tunnel), b.) location, c.) approximate age. P gUFFO(l��� D T LD S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 October 27 , 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: O'Malley Subdivision Dear Mr. Rettaliata: Enclosed is an application to be filled out and returned for preliminary plat approval. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN tZaLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. chultze, Secretary enc. 5�FF0(K T LD w � S Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 June 11, 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Francis and Patricia O'Malley Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The following action was taken by theSoutholdTown Planning Board, Monday,June 9, 1986. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve the sketch map for the major subdivision of Francis and Patricia O'Malley located at Laurel Avenue, Southold for 20 lots on 50 acres in the cluster concept, survey dated as amended April 9, 1986,tax map no. 1000-55-6-35 &36 and 1000-56-1-1, subject to: 1. Relocation of the access road Would you please refer to Sections A106-23 and A106-42 of the Town Code regarding the procedure and requirements for filing for preliminary approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary cc: Howard Young wt�Qy YOUNG %1 YOUNG 400 OSTRANDER AVENUE RIVE.RHEAD, NEW YORK iigor 51&727-2303 ALDEN W.YOUNG HOWARD W.YOUNG Pvofe"w,aL E.ngUwoo 9F Lnnd &wftym Lund Suvveyoe May 29, 1986 Planning Board Town of Southold Suffolk County Southold, New York, 11971 Att: Bennette Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman Dear Mr. Orlowski , Enclosed herewith please find six (6) prints of Yield Map entitled STANDARD SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN prepared for FRANCIS O'MALLEY (85-1482-A) at Southold, Town of Southold, New York, for your use. Very truly yours, &nv , Howard W. Young HWY,0 Encs. cc: Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata +1 N\ �� 1 cvFF01/rr P1�I D ti TV S LD u� w' SL Y Ol ii � Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 22, 1986 Mr. Donald A. Rettaliata Attorneyat Law p.0. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Proposed subdivision for Patricia and Francis O'Malley Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned proposal at the regular meeting of May 19 , 1986. It was the consensus of the Board to request a yield map for this proposed subdivision. Would you please submit six (6) surveys of a yield map to our office. Upon receipt of same, we will schedule this on the next available agenda. Please contact this office if you have any questions. Very truly yours,, /L YU.t ®YCocu'p . dti- �r BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary P �FFO(q- D T LD S y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 May 6, 1986 Mr. Donald Rettaliata Attorney at Law P.O. Box 493 Sayville, NY 11782 Re: Francis O"Mally and Patricia 0' Malley Subdivision at Southold Dear Mr. Rettaliata: The above proposal was reviewed by the Planning Board at the Monday, May 5, 1986 meeting. It was the consensus of the Board to conduct a field inspection prior to any recommendations or action. If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours , or� BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary APR 18 1986 DONALD A. RETTALIATA Af.�y and C ..trot a! 1'a.. 285 WEST MAIN STREET P.O.BOX 493 SAYVILLE,N.Y.11782 518-589.2500 April 18, 1986 Ms . Diane M. Schultze, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Tax Map Parcel Nos . 1000-055.00-06.00-036.000, 1000-056.00-01.00- 001.000 and 1000-055.00-06.00-035.000 Francis O'Malley and Patricia O'Malley, Owners Dear Ms. Schultze : Enclosed please find twelve (12) copies of the subdivision sketch plan prepared by Young and Young as to the proposed subdivision of the above entitled premises . Also enclosed is an affidavit of ownership executed by Francis O'Malley and Patricia O'Malley as to said premises . Please place this matter on the next Planning Board Agenda for their review_ and let me know date and time of the meeting. If you have any questions or further needs at this time, please con- tact me. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, DONALD A. RETTALIATA -/ms Enclosures t APR 181996 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) ss . : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) FRANCIS O'MALLEY and PATRICIA O'MALLEY, his wife, being duly sworn, depose and say: 1. They reside at 240 Secatogue Lane, West Islip, New York and are over the age of eighteen years . 2 . They are the owners of premises at Southold, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York known as Suffolk County Tax Map Parcels 1000-055.00-06.00-035.000, 1000-0.5F.00-01.00- 001.000 and 1000-055.00-06.00-035.000, the subject of this subdivision sketch plan review. 3 . They acquired title to Tax Map Parcel 1000-055.00-05.00-035.000 by deed of Joseph R. Kr:u'.cowski and Lillian Krukowski, his wife, dated r .e '8th day of June, 1972 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 11, 1972 in Liber 7194 at page 597. 4 . They acquired title to Tax Map Parcel 1000-055.00-06.00-036.000 by deed of Joseph Blados a/k/a Joseph Bladdis dated June 5, 1974 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk Count« Clerk on June 13 , 1974 in Liher 7555 at page 141. 5. They acquired title to Ta);. Map Parcel 1000-056.00-01.00-001.003 „.F decd of Stanley Poliwoda, Joseph W. Poliwoda and Alec Poliwoda dated June 28, 1972 and recorded in the Office of the Suffolk County Clerk on July 11, 1972 in Libert 7195 at page 01. 6. They make this affidavit ;:vowing the Town of Southold Plan- ning Board will rely on the facts stated herein. FRA CIS W MALL�EY� PATRICIA W MALLEY Sworn tc hefore me this 17th day of April, 1936. BNEILA C. RETTALIATA NOTARY PUBLIC, State of Nov, York No. 32.4663234, Suffo& Co ty Tam Expires, Mach 30, 19h LASER FICHE FORM SUBDIVISIONS Project Type: Major Status: Open SCTM # : 1000 - 55.-6-36 • �- Proiect Name: Bayberry Estates Subdivision Location: west side of Laurel Avenue 140' south of Yennecott Drive, in Southold Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Francis and Patricia O'Malley Owner Name: Francis O' Malley Zone 1 : 1625I'd evi-E,al -P9r c0 / -Lu c - 1 Approval Date: n/cr- 0772ovC-F,> PLAT Signed Date: of o I E ,ryoezS D OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information Zone 2: Zone 3: C and R's : Homeowners Association R and M Agreement: Address: SCSSo County Filing Date: MAY 1 1 Zv�o Records Managen'ent SCAN Date: lIl y MMAMlY1\W AEL40"KN10.AWY 'q RAW SAI A A INDRAWN OI 0 >.A2101,]MA 0!BE MW MW'm O .WCAIMW 1AW. O D- :O,Cs w NN6 WAVlY AW I��A,,IWO • 'O O V M`LWb NID .Ot'f IMIbO LYAt d1 L 05 O-O. WO:StO L IaL SI 11 f a COi mW " \ 39 � m c A vwHP r64 oov7, Lot 40 GA,HR,A1Na° •.'r+t W�iAM1 ` `459.86 ' a ,+w».-:,::..,•P MM NIA wo",No 1 N B4°381��'E �'+if...vunmx.,Fwal:swrs,wl.0 nry,cq pt oNa cnEElt _p_ Ci ,M^F:a�Iw'rawnmt,twlzmxiEmw•MR -�- `'RM n<a,.-rn8'W mYE,MKIUG iWOM ` 24.07' IL xv.v1,"+AE"ro\ O A \ A YENNECOTT ? \ s o ° `• 34006 ; �.K r6xx6caTT r $ I1 iD, 27.80' -20 - e6. ' I 5187 I a N 6 9 1 . ` m ,\, � YENXEC Co. Fill No. °_o J �- a N ;P ark , Suff. y e a I "Yennecott P I I Lot 41 f z'D ^ Subdivi,". Lot 42 I 2] 22 ° ` '` I I Lot 413 y° ° m Lot 44 25.60' '• O or formerly I 45 I 2 now Lot ' Yennecott Park Lot 46 1123.6 •1, - " A550. \ 'I• 1 '•i3 ? ,I 1 Property Owners dx I, `.\ i9I.B9^ \ 1, N I\ y0 P Es k 81 Play9roun 2100°E. r -x m ro 2]. Se ze- "Par -N g 25.97' 39 11 `.2 �\ .� I ''1 IA�IL°INE. ENVELOPE 220 A� N-1 ..\ Q \ E `\ '2511121 `.._ (rYP.) x, a o 36.59' \ 1 4 °p 'L6 23. 2' -T�-- LILLO ELE,G -.`27 05' P •3],43' ( ` \ 35.29' 1��.]9'-'1�---- �, _Z TK IL TI,AN I '\ 22.56' �`\ ' \ •\ \ -�1991°N LINEe . ' , ` ` -- ` • ``` „ �z4- - ` ' �''\ P N 39' 17 q 20 \ •\ 25.21' .% -- 11.40 19.45• 17.56. • 23.45• 8 ,^ •lY � - 1 0 23Ito O 19.76 36.89' r15.39' Lot 47 K)W -- � ` - Rd 6.78 . DIPEN SPA "Bz 2Q 7a + e 1].]6' _ �. ♦ •, 8.61' � \\ 11 •, 21 .52' 1 ) \,• • "A\ °. . •'\ 1 26.5 AGR eh \ \'1 39.94\• 1 I 22:]4' , ] 93' ��` 1�.96' __.. \1 95 JO' 1 q � . N•. ry�A 18.98' is. O' i I P 'I n, 'P,\ ' • f - -'-----' I , 3.30' ,tY / OCMAP SLTION 600 f LAN D �'.� 19.66• , ' now Or former) \... `• 26.24';. _ -- -- ' _ 5_ .5 Y 16.7]' {e` , 120.96' 9.27°0 25,03'` O 9.41' j Richard H, Wheeler B 2`y �64 16.73' - - It LDureen E. Wheeler ro o '`• pp p r y ro (� � ' 1 1 '� 6 17.]0• 23.45' ' ` 2].69• / \ N0.3 _ V r 01�Y `A I, a4S y�e• LINE OF WETLANDS \ - ` I ' AS FLAG EDBYN.Y.S.DEC. B o1' 84.9 IQ LOCATED 6/1/89 16.79' � _ ' 26`66' 23.3 28175i'.. -- '\ •• 'P�0.24`.`36.53 .••�_••. '[ '\ 3�{66O39F - M5 'Ga31. 111 19.55' 17.76 Q 3 .] \ 1 U (P '• •\ ` 30.40/ Q- 1 ,/J/ q1 0 .46- SO 46' ', 37.69' P 16.97' 4 37' ' N\ < / 1 '�\', '\' 26. D 6 w 0 \ 39 J9' 16.BO' I 1 .f s. N '1O 2 '�rI•. ZL?\ V �.... 17.04' 1 4 ( 29.96., ESS ° ?%9 s q "r IG /^ 6. 1 IG I VE ' ` 'Pp YI .A; 4'O, 1 P COC) 6.59' /. / C •\S \ '1� OI "03 33 �4. �' Yo 0 006 �J.F. It. MP °.Lp° .1�, Ig, GMp Ge \ 4,11 °F IBB OF u 1\ �S4c6,0>-t r a SITE DATA Y l '23. 13') 25,215 ) µµ4 4 \A° 'J a , 30 6 ; . 9° dW °% q D I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 AC. 1 20.20• -c\ \ \ L 36.4fi' 1.1 \` 11 " tiPoo s• \ ' 4 o Md®0. Grp 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT - I'R - 80" RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY 'A' '\ , I i V mN0 - 255 of \a N0.\ 3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 16003 L.F ' ° 4. TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 18 ,'•,S6.e a m , , A. 19.85' 1 `,p1 1' 3413 F 6D 6± °J.FT ` 0'\ ?Ip.O2Z.0 q ^ ~ _ 572.83' ae� g 5 OPEN SPACE AREA 32.8 3 AC. 5.88°5T 30"W. y g _ I 2f�t.Ceo• '1J 1 1 / Ili ' , 'I '1 V 28.7 �O 18 O 1 15 A '•f' 16. 0\° 17. 36• / ; < 1 `,\ oo/Sb. C.a. NZy Bol 19.79' - 10 -------------------____ 1 0 19.45' _- Sfl.90• `� rye,'- 2'il. /f/ .9 - p//1 - z tm t- o\. g 1-\D 45 " o 16.56' `, / ` l9 O " �� S,%Sl- \�� :;IA �h19\ i' 6 x N N 2 19. 17' 8 N0\ - 20. 16' ;, \\ 31000- S.F:�? "M o a u. -O \ 27 ?I� x205/0 ^ 1 to ` y d ? J 3 17 ) P N 2�N 62. \\ P W 20 94' ._ now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel ^ nn °o'; Y -3' m4 3 000 h p ! e �y."'.11. 6•!'y .51' `` 7g5`` 'o-W -4 .} / . 21 fi• 1 . 24.°5 O �o MH- S. 20.06' g00 '� ••,I"` O Pu ~OS X90• 5-rA 2A' •, 6Dpi�` ; D '` NryQ 1 19 I, MP 1 a BYE;` \ lOOd3q°{ ` 6 .~� 2p' oF IOQ 26.49• 2 .23. 1 ..i ` 2f.6 S"W,Y' 94"W• - m P--m- - ---P LL'_. Z D P f l •PAG E- 1 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 2o.6s• 'N' \`(','' DRAINAGF GRFA' CATCH eASINS� , V\6 \ ' ` ` • A • 0 042 79' tiP 4.31' AG F, 5:19 V= ARC C T° CONSIST OF PRECAST 4x4' BOX 1 U1 1 \ . I H o J , WITH WICONCRETE SLAB a CAST IRON FRAME a GRATE. 24' 1 _ O. ' `C" ,Or 5 0 :` 2• 1�0 0 `; • �' A- TPIBUiEA ARV AR =3925005F. R= G RAINFALL EA 3 GRATES TO BE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PATTERN 2 67 (,� NO 2617 OR EQUAL. �; / .' C =COEFF OF RUNOFF = 0.25 SF ` + - V =392500 S.F. x O,S FT.x 0.25 - 49000 C F MANHOLES TO BE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PATTERN \` \ 0.�$ 1 I I 35066 GO G DD 0'<A ' Z,n g / P N0. 1104A OR EQUAL. 1A 24.6 6" \' 6:•33' VOLUME. REQUIRED= 49000 CF 23.38' . I , , 2n. fi' ,ELT y�. 15 �1- - -------- '� PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP VOLUME PROVIDED: 54000 C.F TEST HOLE NO.• TEST HOLE NO.9 TEST HOLE N0.10 TEST HOLE NO.11 TEST HOLE NO.12 TEST HOLE NO.13 EL.• OD EL; OA'EL1 00' EL.• 0.0' ELI QO' VL.- 0.0 OI TOPSOIL 24, TOPSOIL , 2,.E TOPSOIL � 23D TOPSOIL , x5a TOPSOIL 101 TOPSOIL 0.5. , g.PT7. 111 ,, I e nl /Jg ., Q tEv tg.N_ 64 L. PREPARED FOR L0 L0 L0 (<\ 0 0 LOAN 6 LOAM LOAM �, £ EP' 26.59' LOAM CLAY $5' 2.0 LOAM .f- P��P \ Ql :1 tltY`^`'E .rO '1'O 'I .In Y6 u C• S. 'r '92 3.0' 3.0' 7 O^ ° 0 •�" C° \. ^: 06 25 37' - SAND ° -\�' °' 20 °: °° a 2 BAYBERRY ESTATES NOTE : S.0' CLAYEY 4.0' 0�0mr k.\0. nO 0Y F` '� E_ '`\ 23.24 w I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP SANDE CLAY "• gyp'-° \60 2] ' '` " °" Qe 1 •Yy@ ap 2O° a' DIST. 1600 SECT 666 BL.0! LOT 636 oaW SAND 6 SAND 6 sexy p L418� P•V 0 1 21.pG� p m a '\e' a2 T • •� DIST 1000 SECT-9-5-6 8L,61 LOT 01 GRAVEL GRAVEL \PR QE= 00`1 \ IF \ \+s D' ---'' AT SOUTHOLD Z ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. i R F r•R /�` Q ` � O \ 23.3 p-� 2 s4xo 6 CLAY .t e]�QR`'\ 24. 3 ,.: e65y: 00 _ S� Q.� q.6 DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929). HIGHEST 0 \ +_ T 7 STA' 3 \$ GRAVEL t" Q{ °' D 25.01' P �` Z' 13666 /� �2D O -2 5 ' ILO AND A 11. WATERED p.5 pPp' e'�9 a°( 11 F ' \ i \ ` - / 1 2 1 1..4 T� G -116 23 13' ' 12.0 CLAY 12.0 F'(('tne SIIII,s ?'o 1b `I .�- . ,• \ . _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RY e- N`�0. CLAY IEA' CLAY ,rl(K A \`' bDD • 91 ` 41 005. Q 0' '•/ 120 - 17.d CLAY IT°'G/W I60' 170' H.0 \� eD/ 1 2 66' I , N 3'(o d'00 =°J.F �' cna E51" E o 33, SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y o °F Yo 90 ,•'W \ fid,"6°5 g56D0z5. �. / 2 A 9' A✓o /SEs" / • .' \ V `' 6 ^ e .7 ��IIC \u' 01% 1 --'�- ,4.62• TEST HOLE NOA TEST HOLE NO 2 TEST HOLE N6 3 TEST HOUND , TEST HOLENO.5 TEST HOLE N0.6 TEST HOLE NO. T Ci. ' n, ELS 0.0' EL,Go 11 -6.0 EL.• 0°' EL• 5.0 E*�O.O' \' q _ M 23.09' T.. lea TOPSOIL 2nA TOPSOIL 2E1 TDPOG�IIL 05 EOl oA TOPSOIL O!• O,Y , -\ - �,, I , ,' 4 QO I.0' ( Pi a 6 22.72' ` ' of (A M rt 'D 6 LOAM 6 CLAY SANG 6 CLAY LOAM 0 �y• / 1 Tl LS D 2.0' I.5' GRAVEL 'E ' / \� LD 20' I.!' fes. Z.\ @ 2R 0 D, Ay:ll(\ O CLAY SANDY SAND/ HIGHEST 0 QB S _ R\C( AR ° I (l CLAYd WATER nVO 7 l �SE9 = I G'P ,,-_ -W 14J CLAY D.C.' LOAM 2A 9 fox, 20. H Sfs�E NOLE OF QL r _ _ rj 01� a w_ IV,-pF NEW , CLEPN CLAY °� °\3 Wim' 2 I \� 121.68 _ - Q ONS O �• 1 HIGHEST CLAY HIGHEST CLAY ANO Z°� O py R 20.40' - �nW°r • \'\TA 90a` v7\3' . 4.J�' O Q� W, 7.0'PERCHED 7.0'PERCHED '"Q,° aEM LO FY _ rf. WATER WATER SAND 12°' G/W 19°' CLAY SANDGRAV5 9 ^ l: F 22.52' N @ \\� y(� $\ 4/W CLAY 17.0 CLAY 10.0 \ 0 �0 OR Y'1 ��jj,,,, (y \c U' m ,,y 1\ cLPv AND CLAY 3sd \ 5 '� o"00 tP\ N +Y Nc' O ,� J� \w pa0 �e FEB 161993 S * SOUiH(ILD iO\JN CLAY G' 20 _ ti 2 .67 O ° X P, 4Y ,JAN. 5;1993 p1,pNNING GUARD HIGHEST .L 5 p - ,,pi,,'L T ," U• @. OCT 271992 GRAVEL FINE 32.5' 12.d WATERED 4i\,3°s \4" q - SQV PJ(�(6� N° \3 yPT\ DATE . JAN. 6, 1992 Y LEAN �r. s4uD LEAD s4xD6 \E o e*U 4\°`' A SCALE ' I " = 100' 40 VERHEAD, N.Y. GRAVEL 6 , ETAY(A ALD PE 8 L S LIC NO. 12845 nn0 m /2.9.0' Is.o' .0' ,z.O' 36. 0' no' ° ^` ° / ` Q\v - \2, a N0. 85 -1482 NOWS L.S. LIC.NO.45893 Y/. r SHEET I OF Z 50038 ?2 . 40 P. I.= Z .50 2 . B9 26.00 VG - 0.8 AC =20. 4 V C A T= EXISTING RADE + O. GZS + S PR POSE GRA7- 8` 220 F IB CMP N 0.6 O'• 255 OF IB CMP @ 0.6 O '• 220 OF IB CMP@ O. 00 ' • 03 C.S. NW O. I C.B. 0. 3 T/C = ?-4,. IIC. 1 M. H. A C.E5, 0. 4 T/C = 27.91 1.E. = ZZ. 8& Q Q B. No. e. J T/8= 23,G I . E = 19.24 T/G = Z91 - LE. = 20 83 J d ui .B. NO. /C = 23.18 I.E.= 17. 9 LE. = 0.56 Cl -46' 01: 18" CMP G' .600 'A C.B. NO. 2 O T C = 20.46 i.e. = 1-7.65 O Q T/C = 2 .11 ] Q 45 pF I B°CMP @. 0.6 0 % 0 Q Z I.E. = 16 .63 0 w I E, = 2 ,36 W L.P. 20. 54 a J ZB 39 Z C .B. No. Z F 7(C = 20 46 9 ° Z I E.= 16.39 U - Ow a a m �Y I- d m N 0 > m ' a o s Q m u - ° - - a r s °u m a m m r 0 H a m N r m ro m w m r N m m 03 r S y N N N N N N N N N N ? N N N N N N (v W O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N N h 0 0 0 0 0 N O O m 0 _ 10 0 N 00 0 0 0 Q 0 0 O O N O s r N 0 m 0 10 r [Din 0 N 0 m m 0 m N O e r N N 0 0 0] m 0 N 0 N m 0 + a + ♦ f + 4 f + + + + + T i f k + + + + + + + + + + i + + + + + + T + + O 0 0 0 06' m m m l0 mr r rr r 3 S N ID m d d .} m m m m m m N N N - - 0 O 0 PROFILE ROAD "A II SCALE HOR1Z. : I` = 50' VERT. "-= 10' 23.40 24,04 30.70 27,89 EXISTING CBRAIIE EXI-TING GRA E + 0 .600 '/ PROPO ED GRADE PROP SED GRADE Q Q h C'E3. NO, 3 - T/C = 2 .91 p Q C.B N0. 5 1. 55 . 03 Q T/C 23.62 j Q I P.r 17.92 Q d C.B. NO. 4 F d T/C.= 27. 91 2 C.0 No. la Q I.E.= 20. 56 rZ - T/C = Z3. IB 2 Z w W W +J 0 c0 N d N It v v a v v 0 0 0 O 6 m N N N N N N m m m m 10 m N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 Q 0 UJ O 0 0 N m 0 N O + +0 C)+ N O + 0 m N O 0 O 0 - - N N mm N N - + 0 O 0 t PROFILE ROAD IIC11 -t PROFILE ROAD HBII SCALE SCALE HOR1Z. 1"= E50 ' HORIZ, 1"= 50' VERT. I" = 10 VERT. I` = 10' 0 6" PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP Z" 4" PREPARED FOR FINISHED R= 1ASPHALT WEARING R BAYBERRY ESTATES GRADE S URFACE, .rz in AT SOUTHOLD 5 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SLOPE 1:3 MAXI : �__V4 ' I \SLOPE 1 ' 3 MAX.URB - SUFFOLK COUNTY, N .Y. 3000 P S. 1. CO NC. I N CONCRETE @ 28 DAYS I 3' CURB o e 8 1- '/2" WEARING COURSE 2- '/z" BINDER COURSE � 4" COMPACTE0 BASE COURSE s/4" CKOSHFO SCONCRETE OR TONE GLENO TYPICAL ROAD SECTION N.T.S. TYPICAL MOUNTABLE CURES DETAIL N.T.S. FEB. 16,1993 y00�ry g 'YlIG � JAN 5, 993 OCT2992 400 OSTRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD, N.Y . 2,1 DATE JAN. fi,1992 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E. 9 L,S. LIC. N0. 12845 SCALE 1"= 100' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y S. L.S. LIC. NO. 45893 NO. : B5 - 1482 THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S. P.E. LIC. NO, 61483 SHEET 2 OF 2 50038 N 4.o Lot 39 0"0= Lot 40 rn V `45996 ' 4 1, N.84°3810 E. DxD D11R Y -p- 24.07 ' \ pTT YENNEC ° 3a000 : F a ',a'I I `° IF I 1 I I I 27.90• ._,26 �'•\ es. �^ / File No. 5187 a OUR °R I Suff. Co I 0.0" "Yennecott I` of £ ° Subdivisnn - Park 1 Lot 42 L 41 ..-., z7.zz• No I I Lot 43 I eo Lot 44 zs.so' ''•� O �, now or formerly I Lot 45 I 2 ) N Yennecott Park Asso. Lot 46 I I 11z3.65' 1 1'1 '•, � 4 d - EIS Property 0w L 9.69 N g00. "Park & PIOY9r0undl 8 2100'4. ' \ \� 1 m lu , z]. Se• "48 '' \ - 25.97' ILtl �l p 1B .?, tD \ �S , I251112�' � ING LNV ELOPE (Tyr.) 7�,1�L 1 - 4 of LILco ELecTKIL � "� 7 37.43' I , 35.29' 1 1 - YKA N�iM Iy'y I \ 22 56' 'I \ , 101V LINED p u39' 17.5 17 56' ♦3 - \• , `. 25.aEL .' 17.40• 119.45• 1 \S`O \ \ ♦ • -24---------- 23.45' 8 �- . 23 AOO 1_ 1].60' ` 16.39' ' 2 33' F W r is 39.78' 30.09' 23\AQ' . \\ P Lot 47 o LF 1, 1� 3_ 02• e. m • 17.78• 38.78• //I DG 6NCnr A \��;': 20�7$•, 21.52• C) \ 7 93' II 1 se• 2 . 5 AGRe�i '� \', i9.94' 16. 0' _ 51 Pis JO' IL a 'Lro um , - ' 3.�0' 39.86 Ip ' I ,'•„_ ------ SCALE;1" =600 T L A N D `7 �J,JJ-"(� � ' p '/ LOCATION MAP now { 16 --L5 ROP�gED or formerly .`,- 20.96• - \... z6.24"'.--- - -- 5_ "s s ,' "� ,1n 36.77' '� 39.`270°: 25.03'` - _ _ O 9 41' \, Richard H. Wheeler & z4 - ! %1 , _ - ' Laureen E. Wheeler b 64 16'43 36 73 2r�I �A f - - - J. o Wi 1' ,' 1 .fit' 1J JO• / \ / � I �4i �6�_ - •\ 27.89. 'O -q \IL LINE OF WETLANDS \ \ ✓///�. AS FLAG ED BY N.Y.S. DEC. IRS,C. 8.01 ' ` 24.9 9// . 30 ' -32D11D-w5. 1pP it LOCATED 6/I/e9 36 J9' '1 26!86' - -LS 31. 1' 24.3 2d1]51• -- �o.zdL. 16.53' ...��... q[ ', 3000 + 5 F_ G° ,I N 19.6fi' 17 JB ' N • Q \\ 1 .] `,'`,'\ `' TO 46; / 200 1 •? 1 III J 3a,°o• / 1].69. .46' P 16.97' 4•.371' r \ 39.79' 1 16.80' Z , •\ `\ 1 s. 99• .. •1 a ' 29.96' .p X J '1 p 1 5.59' v / 17.04' 6. 111 Of' 33. 34• 0 °: 3,1000 'x' 051 r `i 41) '^ •�`� 4 1/`/ JF l ao 0. 10 ao SITE DATA '23. 33'� 25,ie ` 1 x \ \ 11 \`' • 11 3q. 5•; N e4'11n°, I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 NAC 1 L 20.20• . -i1 \ t 36.46' `511 / 5' °�°' 1 \ 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT - R - 80 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY A 3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 1600 t L.F. 4, TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 18 19.85• , i1 1 N . �4$20005 °J.F e S.88°5713011W. 572.83' 5. OPEN SPACE AREA = 33.9 t AC. 16. 2�C S 17. 16'3 i i 1 'SL '1 � 'sb 28.7 1 03 I ` \ 31.Oe� ��J 0 1 ///\ P ° "a 19.45' 18.90' ,,,LLLJ 16.58' NO ' 2 ,1 2$.33 \ Ze Nv H / 20. Sfi .'\ ---/- u0 ' �. it `\ t i 17 27 la 10:00 - %.r O ! / 20.94' . 14' �p_,. .00•.% J .61' \ / . 33' �? 310001 now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel Y Y ' _ 461�0� ••..��yy6�� Y 24.05 r 20.00' 900 21. /6• \ / 1 000±5.r16 94 D P E til ^1 • 5 Y1' ' �A� P m G , -' 't (23. 1 •� � 2' .85 1 2 a9' 24. 1 U3 , \ s\s1YN j 'I SOS' 1` F` 2 2'`. I�O N r 1I h � ' " CLUSTER '' sg' 2 67 {456 26.`33' /I• 011: FI 23.38' ,£ „ �,s1'It \n`2a ] •2ao- 34 N 15 ___ - ` SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN '� " , PLANNING uua�;0 y L 1 Li, q0\ \,2 245 91' 35000 r F % J'I 'J U` Ik k1GNA KGE 1�',6AhI1J 21 \ v PREPARED FOR O4 26.59' i 151 c \ 23 '--- 111 96 s. BAYBERRY ESTATES NOTE : D, 1 ',I{G.30' ;'g a- s \NH i \ ,.U° SDA �.\` 25.37' 23.24 W 204, I SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP - A 27.e9' 3.5 , " DIST, 1000 SECT,BAa BL.Bi LOT ONG &030 r; , 13 .,i '%,:• +,'' z1 7fi• O ', 23 # DIST. 1004 SECT-0841- BL.o1 LOT 01 - 12 \, 23. ---- AT SOUTHOLD 2-ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. •� 1 .(��'� 4. _ ;i- ,e \` ° DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929): / ?°FPAi 25.01' 12 ,`1 ` \A` 3/3000 '_/MJF`,_ ] ; 14 23. 13• TOWN OF SOUTHOLD \ /21.25• - \ . , PNe��\1'1 v0� / N 93• \ i 021 50• ./// ryo N°°/ , o 3•�c,Qo .� .33' SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y 23.6x[ II \ - . \fol F, 19 . ,•Nr'O, . 0 20. 4;6223.79' 23.09• %• p AO u �^ O 20.35' \\✓i 22.72' '``O ;C, OF NEN, 21.04 it' r0 0PPO W. 11r, 20. 1-u1XEAEIIL AI-1.1.�x AUUNIOS 23. 1 S' � 23.68' - - 9Qa. 1� !O LHR$ sUPVEYtlS A VIOLATION Of ' AY' - ,- SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YOU STATE D 20.40' 20 J9' J,r IDUCATION LAW. 22.52' c ND COPIES OE THIS WAVEY IM,NOT REARING ` °�a - THF LAND WkWYOR'S INKED SEAL OR DIEYED SEAL SHALL NOT Y1 CONSIDER. \ �.11 20 q ' 23'67 .R,.p52 p0 F�41epe S' 77 . p 1C L DATE + OCT. 23, 1989 U (OR"A A VALID IDA cory �J SCALE : I " = IDD' ER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, N.Y. CNAMNMM INDICATEDRHEREONT Y THE OLIVES - 1 23.56' ALOE . YOUNG, N.Y.S. BE. S L.S. LIC NO. 12845 oNU IA , AND ON FOR taxon O $Usvn HOWARD W. YOUNG, MY9. L.S. LIC.NO.45893 r1 L1 ECWF• AND Gx AN OPAL TO THE { -� • LA0. 85 -1484 TIiLL COMMNY, O LISTED AGENCY IIA 2D 5 2.B . .NroIxG IEarrtunDH usnD xMsoN, AND • / " FO 1x1 ARE.. OF THE I.NDINO INSI TU,ION MLARANTL6 ARE NOT TKANEHUAM1 y: II!?vJd "F..OVIKMS OF SU,LFOUFMI - ' • _ 50038 1111111 nyxLLFX . xAIIVM-A O lu•'1 Su", IS A VIOLATION Of Y HITI00 m, OI IHI N w YCPK 9A', DO ipUCAIION LAW ,C,,v Df 1H6 SuoV , MP X01 NAMING ° L� IHf LA'fJ +UVVf Nv'S R¢fp SEAL O0. \ $ 0 \A\ R.U. IWI M cnrfmtuc - I0 u n 1A11O I"CL cow 1 O \ 1111LAIW HLpLDX ]NAIL xNN \ Lot 39 o-d= ' Xp,Y „U IXC 1W. I°,WXDM IN[SIIA•C m 6 M;,-,,, A,w aN Hu ':DAL`ro IXf Lot 40 GT SFL1 cumr Aorv, cwanNlwl AL Acwcr Aw N '� GO ON wzlnunu,;u , Hacw+, uw R Av.+.+X11 w IAL I1a0w0 IMCTN < arnrn. a:.r.YXu A.NUr'MAA•THM.N° \� N,84°381+0 E. n LOXW GREEK W.o ,..r. xw. °r„AI KN ArL. oR 4 I 24 07' 1/+�o� 3 I 'A �,: SCOTT YENNEvT 6 ' 34606 Y -`2 F I Flle No. 5187 I o U 21'9! �'L N N arILI Suff. Co. o- xlo N4 N a o I I I Lot 41 £ `, ° , v o , -"Yennecoti P I Subdivisbn Lot 42 27.22• o 0 DID I I Lot 44 Lot 43 zs.6o' O a n o erl w no or form Y Lot 45 © B3, pNJ N N Yennecott Park I Lot 46 23 63 12 DOD t 5.F% g '0 .� arty Owners AssO. l D I` 191.69' 1 50 PPark 81 Playground s 2'oo'E ` a N 25.97• 1 27. 18' 2B ' 6NVELO PE N -�. 1'L �� `�\ `�/ LOIN, T 220' N 38 .. 16.1L��IQ 63 1 �.]4 `'•L 1251121 59' 4 _Y___IL_-T_K-A�NYhVM� 27.05 1ygION17.43 _ V `INEh NN I 22.56' `N •\ _ 4 I r` 139 39 17.5 \ \\ _ . ', 25.21 ' 19.45 17.56' ` L •� ♦ ` 24-_________. 23.45' - - I 37.40• ( L\ `23�L0X'°" 1 0 . ' 16.39' 17 60 W I• 19.78' 18.89' 23.LP• Lot 47 -0 M _ _ s_ oz•to I J ^ I 2�. 20 78' v m 7.76 6.J6 / / J LF G N r A L 0 61 ' . 21.52' O r I 26.5 5 AGR I h `'1 19.94\• \ • \ 7.93' 1 98' _' I 65J0 1\\ 3 02' I N \ T {� G I --__ 19 e6' I c 'pis I �.. A N (3 � r4 3.10' '--- LOCATION MAP i 36. 1' _ __ __ __ _ � _ _ _ _ _ SCALE:I" 600 1 now or formerly � X26.24' N`, Richard y 16,17' 1 20.96 . �' •.. 19."27' 25,03' , H. Wheeler 8 ' �` L r \ O°' - ` r - 1 `` LDureen E. Wheeler ro 0 16.'3' - a N , ////yyy 21.45' .� -/ \ o TEST HOLE D W1 I/I 6 17.70' O .4 \'1` LINE OF WETLANDS ' 1 1 - IL 1'NI' I AS FLAG ED BY N.V.B. DEC. ' `" , 30 ' '20116-*.°,�. ' B.DS" 24.9 779 3 IO LOCATED 6/1989 16.79' `,•�_ 1 '1 2fi186' - 'p5 31 . 0.24`,^16.53. O 20 34' � 37.69. �, 16.97' � '�, 4.`37"L' 26. n I 4 B L,�..NO As 19.79' 1 16.80' ..� A LL1 '\ f ¢ lDY 31 r •o' rj{A'.16.11 L /• 17.04 . Z \ 29.96' , ° .P =°. T 2 '4 '+ / DDO r 11 q\ \' Sgty. 1w"� 2.3� Al. 6.59' ti ` l a II Oji \ 33 p4' = y r100D # OJ.F P OIB GMP @ 1. 1/\ 9 �34e�oo �.F \Ao SITE 'DATA 1 \\\ '23. 13 \25,19 30 6i, N T� q P L0' 0 " I. TOTAL AREA 50.0171 AC 20.20' Si \ \ L 16.46' `` coo°( $+�)s' ` - 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT -ITR 80" RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY IA' �e3. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD = 16001 L.F. ''•,16.e l ` D•3O N 4 TOTAL NO. OF LOTS = 18 a. m z 6 A' 7,L. 2 AC \ ;39, 1ag¢tidos5.� o 5 OPEN SPACE AREA = 3 .8 _ . 39.85' 11c 1 /I N I - S.88057130"W 572.831 S 2S:eo• ' ' n 'S•� /1 44ee 36. ZV1 17. 16'1 ;/ Ir '1 i '1 1 °/S� 0 'Jj� G.1?I NZi eO _ 6 19.79' - - gyp- i '1 31J/.OA - 19.45' 1 ] 'L• N• 2 2'i'. 2$.33 , , .9 - D 2 18.90' 16. 58' -\_/-__ ' '` , n N IU N c, X120. 16• j. 'vI Z ()G! 17 27 ` ` e0 V .Y a W'S / o 22A 62' \ A 0 3, Wk 3 O * GO 20 94' 11 �O \tY�. .00' , \` ,g5�. -� 0 Y @ ZB 1 Y" Y dd F •, now or formerly Herbert R. Mandel _ _ 1 0 _ 16.1 si' 1¢ -.y$60,y0 .. 24.05 \ N OW H. - 20.06' 2�'u6 \ AY \ Tod ///,/\p nla a�,a c3�nWiox Is° y?A g 2'V O.epOi �• ,'� O �4• / `I `V_ o tia o We ZO Dv-. Ia LMe a9• I o i Nm :I 10001_9.f[x5 94` - c __y__' rj',I'AG � '',, DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 2 :23. 1 2 '6 ; / �' m P m e B 20.fi5i' 'rdw ` ```111 a , DRAINAEF ARS CATCH BASINS ° \ , \ L j , O� h ? ' 9' /`epi 4.3S AGREr'J V= ARC CATCH BASINS TO CONSIST OF PRECAST 24. 3 _ i�I' `01 L6r I / A/05' 1, q �m 2• ° 1(G SW A= TRIBUTARY AREA= 392500 SF. 4 x 4 BOX WITH CONCRETE SLAB a CAST IRON / \ W R= 6' RAINFALL =0.5 FT. FRAME a GRATE 2 .6] - C =COEFFOF RUNOFF = 0.25 SF. GRATESTOBECAMPBELLFOUNDRY PATTERN ` `�y3SDODLCO.� Go SUBDIVISION V =392500 6.F. x 0 5 FT.x 0.25 = 49000 C.F NO. 2617 OR EQUAL 'fG X4.6 fiu2p`' I 1 \ 26.`33' / VOLUME REQUIRED= 49000 CF MANHOLES TO BE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY PATTERN �' 23.38' it I`I 0'4.76' '� NEST 0 .�A 3 ro 15 \ _ PRELIMINARY SU MAP N0. 1104A OR EQUAL. 11 ' \�4`11310002yxG. a°y PREPARED FOR VOLUME PROVIDED= 54000 C F '1 / //// Q \3 0005 Co.F: 11 5 u'. �G� ,2 24 91' . p 5 p I+ O tl 1 i1, s. ICI, 10 1 . 4 G.g.N 1v5A o �6 O£ 26.59. \\ , S IL, OQ Gy / A.' 2 62 - 4. g\tDP L.PI ' ''t1�`�e A(O a �a Ae c• s. -( 1 g2 ePOhgh , °, ° 1. �'= 25.37' BAYBERRY ESTATES NOTE BM,Ogy\0' L, 'I ',1,6.3 !\66' `p ` oo „b 'LA - ``. I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP 0 Ve.o��5 27.B9 OO\AV ',L\ Qe.al 3 •„fid `S ` zoo' \`\\ 23 z4 a DIST. 1000 SECT.°66 SL. °a LOT 035Q036 TIS tZa P� 1 J 21.~i6L. 1L 89'p 1 22 �-�` AT SOUTHOLD DIST. 1000 SECT.056 BL.O! LOT 01 N o qJ . •O\. < \ li�, 23. p. 6 - _ - ((ail� rr{� pp 777������•••,•yyL��� 2 ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO M.S.L. j "' a OY6 ` p,� 7•$2 lh L ,ll ` ., I .L RPR ,I 24.1 66.H Ap DATUM (N.G.V.D.- 1929). AV- p10 '50 25.01' " g. 'D 33000 _ � . �S T. 1k .TIG -165 23. 13' _ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 1IIIJLIULIIJUI F0R- y'(P'A 2D' b5 •I T U RY ARE .9 \. \ �[,T 2 9 �gZ T\ 36 � 06D0 91 \ 4-2 oBs. . li NO.3'lodQ0 =5.F / 9S„z,- 1 o 33 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y --� TE„6 o X"f So THDLU WWN 11 \ / 2` ° NNING BUAflD DF D a d 5000 t pj \V/ Y 20. a •4,.62' 23 .J,B' '°' TEST HOLE N0.1 TEST HOLE NO 2 TEST HOLE NO 3 TEST HHOOLENO 4 TEST NO LE N0�5 6 TEST HOLE N0.60 O \e •0• 23.09' �•_ •. ' " -6o TOIOA'L -6.0' , A. ./ ' 1 r, •QOP� TOPSOIL TOPSOIL I,O, A 22 J2' G \ I m•�tiQ,OF µ'p0 6 LOA 2.0' 9 CLAY L5' GRAVEL 2 CLAY HIGHEST OO£ GJ. 1 pfiJ2��� � \0 1 R\ae A= I~\� m� y� 11 P CLAY SANDY SAND/ Td PEREHEO O ', i' /--_ CLAY CLAY 9.0 WATEfl 5°I� 20. PA N P OQ -YGJ ! 0.0' CLEAN CLAY LOAM 2\OJ T 7 A R G P.'' 2 .I1� \TA\T =21.68' -608. 00 c HIGHEST CLAY HIGHEST CLAY AND P rF O 20.40' 'P- - T.0' PERCHED 7.0'PERCHED NO WATER WATER SAND 120' 1Gd GRCUND CLAY G 2 •P`� 1�O F 22.52' o Za ti LP ml aM'�ll� CLAY IT': GROOND WATER Of 1\ O / D� O �Yw4j ,�\� I Mn SHIP. AND WATER CLAY DO O ,4 •(` IY�YAL CLAY 39,6 HIGxEST 2 P4 6Ea zD. p • =- ryIVI .Kfb20 DATE JOAN. 6J,'11992 YOUNG B TO NG b CLAY 326 12.0 PERCHED �a \�' GRAVEL FINE WATER tia. �- S' SCALE : 111 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, N.Y. • ' SAND CLEAN SANDE \E o ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.YS PE. IN L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 GRAVEL O / .N NO. 85 -1482 I-,,0' 16.0' IT.O' •20' 36.6 13 D' s �2 g HOWARD W YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC.NO.45893 20.6 M b4 - 5HEE7 I OF Z 50038 n r 2 3.6c P.I. = O O 2 . 4o P.11.= Z .50 2 . 139 26.00 AC =20. 4 A T= EXISTING RADE - 1.3-10 °� � ' s 85 / PR POSE GRA7 l7fol 1- 220 OF IB CMPe O DO ' = 220 F IB GMP O.L 0'• 255 OF IB CMP N O.L O '= ? -� II 210 OF IB CMPE0.4, O '• C.B 0. 3 T.O. 5.10. I W G.B. NO. 5 M. H . A C.13. 0. 4 m TIC = 27.91 RZ.O. NO, G 'Q T/C= 23.6 I . E.= 19.24 T/C = 7.91 IE. v 20. 83 J .8. NO. /C = 23.18 I.E.= 1-/. -3I.E. = 0.56 p T C = 20.46 LE. = 17.65 O Q 45' O IB CMP S .600 '/ C.B. NO. 2 z LE. = 14-65 Q 45' OF IB" CMP @0.6 O '/° Q TIC .II 20. 54C . H. . = ZH.39 J B. 'EOO. z 7/C - 20 46 p 0 F I E.= 16.39 d d N d d W F a N N r di N N N N 2 N N N N N m N N N Z N N N N N N N N 0 060` Q 0 Od1 N� 0 N 0 O N O O N 0 - ID O N NO O 0 0 + + + + + t + + + + t + + t + + in m 0 N O e r m N 0 0 m N 0 N 0 0 O 0 0 O + 0 + + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + 0 N m 0 9 9 N N N � d vm m 10 m mm N N N +_ � i + + + 0 O 0 It- PROFILE ROAD YEA SCALE HOR12. : 1" =50' VERT. : 1" = 10' Z5.40 24.84 30.70 27.89 EXI 71NG GRADE EXI 4GRA+ 0PROPa ED GRADED GRADE O f G.B. No. .- f T/C = 2 .91 p Q C.B NO 5 � 1.E, = ?C. 85 TIC 23.62 j 0 I.E. 17 .9? h d C.H. NO. 48L T/C= 27. 91 FCB No. U I.E.= 20. 56 Z TIC = 23.. 11 8 Z W _ 4V E.= 17.65 W 0 K) I; fN 0 0 Q N N m m m 9) m0 N N 0 in 0 0 0 O 0 NO 0 0 0 0 rt1 0 N in O + + N 0+ 00 N O N 00 N N O 0 0 It PROFILE ROAD 11Gj1 It PROFILE ROAD 11B SCALE HOE 17- : I°= 50' SCALE VERT. I" = 10' HOR1Z.. : I"= 50' VERT. " = 10' PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP 2„ 4" I1 PREPARED FOR W GRADE FINISHED R= 1° ASPHALT EARING IC BAYBERRY ESTATES SURFACE /2 � ' 50 '-O' m AT SOUTHOLD O \ I TOWN OF SOUTHOLD I 'm < SLOPE I: 3 MAX. \\ 1/4 ":1 • 4 CROWN SUFFOLK COUNTY N .Y. - \ SLOPE l '3 MAX. N MOUNTABLE CURB - _ \ 7 3000 P.5. 1 . CONC. LONG RE'T 2B DAYS CURB a' a ' •�8" h '/2" WEARING COURSE 2-'!z" BINDER COURSE 4" COMPACTED BASE COURSE 8" CRUSHED CONCRETE OR OR OPS • STONE rO STONE 6LEND � T� "I 0 TYPICAL ROAD SECTION N.T.S. TYPICAL MOUNTABLE CURB DETAIL_ N.T.s I.11 ANUSol " YOUNG e Y G f OCT, 22,1992 400 OSTRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD, N.Y. DATE: JAN. 6,1992 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E. 8 L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 SCALE I"= 100' HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y S. L.S. LIC. NO. 45893 NO. ' 85 - 1482 THOMAS C. WOLPERT, N.Y.S P.E. LIC. NO. 61483 SHEET 2 OF '2 50038 e Ap p \� D_ Lot 39 °o_m Lot 40 NN U y \459.86 ' ° `1 2$.39' ` LONG CP EN 1 24 07- Y ENNECOTTCP I O LD27 60 ' •!-/ rLC7 / �!1 IA , EMN COiT r N e. 1 Fill No. 5187 a 88500 s.f 28,'79 I "Yennecott Park , Suff. Co I o=0 4 'g: N ro E N =° R m o I Subdivisic I I Lot 42 I Lot 41 £ _ LD I I 43 27 22• ;I N w,a .0 p- " M Lot a7s' Lot 44 25.60• �' ° m -F+� Lot 46 Lot 45 2e 83• POr 8! Playground I i9l es^ a `'• $ m ° Ru k I N.B 2 00 Ems, A - \4d 27. 18- ------ .O - 8i� 25.97' 18. ARK d ` `\ dRAIf�AG� ', AREA '•, TOTAL AREA= 84200 s.f. 16.159' RIGHT OF� � ` 723., G• IbTAL `PREPkP7500 s.f. 'AREA_ff-EA$EME_NT=4100 s.f. a y 17.a3• % 10' EASEMENT '•_`27 05' e ••� TOTAL C•Q= 10090022p,as. \ 1)3 39' IJ Sfi 17.56AREA OF WETL b5= 60g0 s.f. -� '� 3301..1 25 21' 17.40• ! 19.45' \' m AREA OF EASE IWS=14(00 s.f. : •, `, 410' �, " L.I.L.CO, ELECT STT\\ 0 '. 140 3 ` Q, �`2423.45 RIC T _ a RANSMIGSION LINE W K) 0)f 17.60' I 15 76' 23`yp. ` 36 3 \\ �� 2,4.33' �. , Lot 47 U) 'O • `� \ 1 a6d 1• 02' •2?_• 2e. \\ ay --. ,` � ` ,,... ,.,N. o 17.78' -- \ / O 22 ` `.\77' ,7a, TOTAL AREA 80000 s.f. m1 o `.\ / TOTA AREA= 101500 s.f. \ 1G fi 21 52' ` -- 22,'74 '•\ �7 93 f 19.9e• AREA OF TLANDS= 1!1§00 0. i9 94'• `\` 1 02' i a .\ '� 1e.98• 16 0' ,00 , g5.70• - \ b AO. TOTAL AREA= 920003.fr___ _ 1 . �• r `'$, 5n0 a ,`q o. E U / now or formerly 6.77` , ,, ! 20.96' ,/ a s, '/ Richard H. Wheeler 8 \ �' 2 SCALE =600 ,1 . F- ETLANDS ,10500 f. N E \ LocprloN MAP LDUre .64' 19 27' 26 4' 25,03' 25.5 / / / PROPOS D I en E. Wheeler v O 6.]3 ° N // 29.,41' . IS 62' I 1; 70 1 21.45 .� p�� _ _____ _____-_____-aB_ p . ' \ / LINE OF WETLANDS 11 ` 27.69' - 1 R __._..__.________ 3 POD ', 10 80000 s.f / AS FLAG EDD 6/1/8. DEC. e.o1•'` e4`9A' LOCATED 6/1/89 16.79• ��':.• ! 26�6ErOTAL AREA= 85500 s.f. 1 z3.3e lo', 231751'.. `..,i6.fi3 ...� •. ` //..ppppA OF WE'�'LANDS=40 \ A 31.01 ' 19.65' I 17 J9 1 7 ^M- 99 \\•�J / 30.463 \ PARK & RECREYITION AREA 7 69 4� 3 4 1 5-5d 19.79' 1 16.80\\, 11.4 HE ACRES1 W' 29•,37• r ,' 26.04',,. 1 , A \ 17.04' 6.59. ` /• `6 , 29.96 II 'I TOTAL AREA=80500531 1 0 9 ' O __ a 3 i ARBA uF WEtLANDS= 500 s.f. tT 1 \\ �, . 33, \25.39• N 61000 5.f. n 20.20' \ \ \ ' 3d,.56', \\ 16.46' 26. 40' N i •,16.62 .� -S6 6L'�.3 `,, `\ \, �/ �'• ! 4 � 1 SITE DATA: 21 '39'572.83 29 10 � (P ' 11 a 1 54d E, 01. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 ACRES W. S.88°5730" i , N 16. N 3 2i.eo• 11 ,3yD Y1 �g 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT = "R-80"RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY A L,1LIP 17. 16' _ 4` , 1 19.79' ..............._. w\ 1 1 ' c N10, i f ' 'r `� L40 ------____,-___ _ 1 � � o ,l � \ 4. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD =2240 FT. p' 0 I _ LOTS 18 N t" T t 39.45' , 33.0E \ - _.__._-___ .O_- ° + 18.90' 2 72 ,'. 2$.33' o 16.5 j- rf 81500 s.f. r3 / 20. 16' i. `\ `, 12' ` \� 27 63' , 80000 11s.f. 27. , now Dr formerly Herbert R. Mandel 20.94! 1r O 22,se' 28. 1o`, , mo :�. -00' S1 1, 26 13' -28 20.08- - °O'J 21.j16' ,` 1 ;• 24.05` $ ` 1 �4 270 i 1 , g. -l✓ L N N 120.85O, 1 .1\` N }4 1\ + n 235 24. 1 111 �, I 13 25 79' .,' p ``" 24 os 1. 24.e2' - " LIFES '-BOODDfi.f. STANDARDI24.6 ,01'120.�P� ,23.36' ' Zn .76' `24.34' / 26.93' . / ° I„TQ�4LAR a= zDoo3.f. SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN -�� -- SOUTHI;.D TOVa4 O 1 24.7n' .9 a �N PLANNING DUP.RD PE £ 26.59- RFA OF WETL4NDS2000s.f. 23.54• 1 550 N PREPARED FOR -� NOTE : £ \ , '1!, an 23.99.'-_- a I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP '1 ',, 6 30' ZO`E65' A 25.37 19 BAYBERRY ESTATES loco 055 oe °3e 3036 1i -" 27.69• , ', , 80000 s.f. 23.24 W DIST. SECT._ BL._ LOT O O , 1 r 2 ,'-r�' 5 ' 'N DIST I000 SECT.owe flL.of LOT of 0 - 23 Elk. s' l � \9 `` 23 + 2 ELEVATION AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED =o ` %•, ' 11 AT SOUTHOLD TO M.S.L. ( N.G.V.D.- 19291 •�' ,��, 1 � 23.3724. 12 ' n ----•'' ' 25.01' •I / 260 _ ` 17 23. 13' 21,25• 81000S. f TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 21.66' 24. 10' 'J 23.88'', d'• A'-,, 16 23 33• 7 N ,= SUFFOLK COUNTY, N . Y 1L / 9 d6' BOb00 s.f.` i '22 • o u LD 19. o: , . � `11 "N ED D 20.90' B• -'ZD ', ` 24\.62' 2 .70' 1� ° OF p ' BO 23 09' QI'�O • S�'IE NBw` 4' R 4,4 00 NPNP uruuErJN p•E31� C! �G 20.35' 15 2 04' 22.72' a?T ,o a+xs waver lsevrourNw eR O o 20. 82000 s.f. , ,L_ _ -> .R P\ ow a m Y.€ruoN r;soR w rxe Mw veXVE n,M 2 N W, y0UCAT19N Wx. 7 ' o c- HI Pe TNI`4HAWEM.NeR Nor 41RW3 O, 20.40' g0_ 20.79' 23 ?1� � _. ;`23 ,68' _ - - 908 5 p, p LAND EEAT NOR'i IplRep SeAL sl \ O 22 52 !y �' 45fl9fl INo°:SCU AW.HWE NOii GE CONS10lRtl S\- 1 r° N n EES IN rwe 11 EN O v/ . . \ fAND 3eASEyp4 i 7rv�r TO THE ausoN FOE WHOM MI sl3v31 20.4 23 87' O 1s xaerww, •,m o, Nis ",,E, TO m! �52 ' ATSEPT. 25,1969 .1 IE c0evnnn, c(E1HAmsNru e,G,,,,� j 23 56' 91 DE YOUNG B YOUNG .nmva WSrINXON HIM PFEON, Nq -n THE Assignrcs 0e THE isrv=wa OEM 1 y., SCALE : I " e 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE.,RIVERHEAD, N.Y. -nnr:,,, w.nAneu Nx, NOT rFnn5v=W NO. 1 85 -1482 ALDEN W. YOUNG, NYS. PE. 9 L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 : . :4n1 in Vvininvi 09 sUM1ilA111L91 20.6 •, \� HOWARD W. YOUNG, MCS. L.S. LIC. N0.45893 9f °UfeY 50028 4 N 0 O ( 00 O �] Lot 39 O-o= Lot 40 \ rn Nm N � 1 < 1 1459.86 ` N.8403 SV"E. O 1 25 39' 24.07' 4 I � PENNECOTT I ° , '_1 N Corr I 2 27 90• 0 d6. qi I O. 5167 A N 88500 S.f. 26.']9 e1` �° r Orr D I Suff. Co. F11e N o_o g: ro ) "YennecotI Porkl + I Lot 41 £ S SUbdIVISO ' Lot 42 I 27.22 \ u "'+ A o, i m N m Lot 44 Lot 43 25 60• 475' O ILot 46 I Lot 45 LO 1123.63I •\ za a3• ' e, y A rK !3 Playground I• Po w �YJ.B 2100 E. "� lg, RECRIsATIdA� A \\4d L" 1 m N 2s.97' ,1 zJ 1e' .O -'•28' N o: Se ARK dRAIf�AGf { AREA TOTAL AREA= 84200 s.1 N OF W 1 E, ' ,'AREA_Pg- s.f. u pa �: -�OTAL QRE•M'4�00 s.f. �' m 16.s9• RIGHT ` - 17 43' T .� 23.'v32• .,N IO' EASEMENT "�.2>.05• " \ `• - 17 TOTAL E = 106900 s',f56 17 56' AREA OF WETL DS= 6OQ0 s.f '-i\ `33pn ` 25.21' 1 L.I.L.CO. ELECTRIC l/� AREA OF EASE IQFS=MOOD s1, 1 .f. '2 _ - 23.45 410' N -L- TRANS LINE 17.40' ! 19.45' \� \ \ \ m 140 3.\ 0 ', 4 -, +'� ION 1\A 0 ` \\L1 , \ 17 fi0' 18.69' ` 16.3 \ \� 2 33' Lot 47 w I 19.76' 23.kQ' ,\\ A - L to 1 p30 r_ 02'17 76- - ` 22-_ 2Q \ 20e `• ® •u IO 18.78' \ -2P.,77- o I '7af. ' TOTAL AREA s. u o \ •/ TOTA AREA= 101,5100 s.f. ab 6 \ 21.52' . -- \ y17.93' 19.96• AREA OF TLANDS= I�ZOO s.If 19.94'` 7I 22:]4 ' •'\ 18.98' 18 0• ` ``___•' \ `, q5.70' 1 02' N \ :, / \ _ p01 ® ___ _ (\ 1 - o OTAL AR = - 1 O 1w E 19.�,1' A F-W.ET DS- 10 s. / ) now or formerly ,[F - 11 _ - - " ' / SCALEW' -600 g af. \ ^� RE LAN 500 f. �'Q L ED LOCATION MaP } 20.96' \ \ �... `, 26.24'; 55.5 A' ,+N �pR�p�s i Richard H, Wheeler & 1e. 7 2 y 64 39.'27• 25,03' Laureen E. Wheeler ro o fi ,1 ' 1 16.]3 - --_-- - vE ' - - - 29.51' \, ! I� W �/ �/ i6' 62.62' / 17.70\ •1 / _♦]<PO_. 'Y^� , O ,'P• / LINE OF WETLANDS st 1� ---'-- -"-- ` 80000 s.f. AS FLAG EDD 6/1/S. DEC. ` Im• r e.o1•�` e4.9A• I LOCATED 6/1/89 1e.79• ��'•^.__ , 26�66T07AL AREA= 85500 . - - 31 za17s3•.. -- `� I •'' ,'z�o.za`.-36.53 .__��, AREA OF WET0.LANDS=400CL sA� 39.65' SJ 78 J \ 1 N St \ ` `\ 3 q• \ 330 ` m ,N' _ PARK 9 RECREWTION AREA � 1 1 24,.37' ,1, 19.79' 11 .4 ACRES f r/ 1 97' 24, 26.04 1 17 04' ` E`, \ 1 pap " 28 99' 6.59. `6 b,d 1 2911 9b' 9 „] TOTAL AREA=80500 s.f1 . 1 m . 13'� zs.aS ARFA OF WEpLANDS= 500 5J. o 2i1'� 81000 s.f. 20.20' \ -\ \ \ ` 30, 56', 16.4fi' 1 N : 28. 90' 'N n 16.92' -x6 Ga-ti♦ ', SITE DATA ` _ \ X1139' 1 29' �4/ ' 1 340 N I. TOTAL AREA = 50.0171 ACRES U' '� p- O 19 es• 1 , ` , N N 2. ZONING USE DISTRICT = °R-80°RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY A S.88°573011W. ry 572.83 2 `s'�\, 1 S• 2i e0• . `I � 1`,396; I 36. •Nd 1,. 36, , -- =9 � 2ND$ 3. N0. OF LOTS = 18 19.79' . _ \ ao I I 1 Nr^ 4. TOTAL LENGTH OF ROAD =2240 f FT. _ � ,03 , 1 Q9 O I a o� i II 31 .06' O d t - \ 19.45' 2 72} 2y� 33 81500 s.f. ' , ` .____._-___ C 1e.9o• 16.s6• TV -- \ - 20. IF 11. , , �, I2, 27.83' N 27. �. 19. 17• -�B 1 5 / '..• ` ` 800 .f. 00 `s 20.94' . • 22162' 26. 10 28 \ G \a _ 11: . •.- . 13' 41 O. m R. Mandel • now or formerly Herbert - _ ��\, _QOyy s1• __ _ ____ -� 6 DO6•Y 24.05'\ 6` \�m 20.08' EFF 2, fl6' 1 \A; \\ -16 + 7d 16.` p / $193,` • , `, fi`i .O � 25.94- - - .85 , HE 20 20.65' 'N " ' / 23 5 25 79• (ti 24. 1 IUs " ` �• 24.05. 1 4 j.� yO, \` `,, I 80000 s.f. - N -- 4. STAN DARD / FEB 4. 24.6 6u 2p\'\ 20.@A� 1, 'G.J6' X24 34' 23.38' 'I` , ` : 14`z ' .`, _ z25 SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN SaN,HI;!ROAll, I / ` ' - PLANNING 6uAKD.d 1nTIQT14L AREA=1000 s.f. 24.7n' � .N'. ON10RFpOFWETL.4NDS2000sf. 2154 ,,DN �! ,PREPARED FOR O• f 2fi.59' \ A I , ` 23.93'._; NOTE : � 18 y 2580 BAYBERRY ESTATES 6.30' I. SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP � �"' 27 es ' 1 �; 1 •� gD!\e5• 'z � � � ,'L 80000 s.f. 23.24 N DIST. 1ouo SECT.O5s BL.Da LOT Dss aoss `„ DIST. IDOL SECT.066 BL. 01 LOT 0I o . :' J� \95 ] 23. a 2. ELEVATION AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED `1 23.37' \3w AT SOUTHOLD TO ELEVATION ( N G V D. - 1929) �' i 24. 12 t - 25.01' I ,e Z60 11\` I7 23 13• , 81000 5. I. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 2166 24. 10 23.33' SUFFOLK COUNTY) N . Y - "cD� ti 1, 9.rJs' BOb00 S.f.`1 '2 0ED ' w 0 19. 01 20.90• '-20 2�.62' 2 .79' + a+ 4 S Pjg OF N fby` 'O e3.09• �'PD W, y oqr O, q' 1^ '1)04. 20.35' I5 22.72' C\O 01N ,tD OZ 0 82000 s.f. z .04 rwLOo.uArcDNbI6NlaOs.uN,navuDEvw A.:...I,ON OE AIWOR � 5 ' 2.Z_ _ \ -_- _89__. tP_N O 9 20. (°E S_IE A v1.11 23. 1 O ttu.N 72nOF .L HE <W Si"\ O 20.40 20.79 . • O T COITUS OF THIS S,AVEY MAI NOL EEA41NR \-0 ' ' 0� rVIL LAI:n ]I1n4FYOP'S INRFO SEAL OF 22 'N2 I\ F rn NO. 45893 'N,-ESFu RAt SHALL NOT EE COOSuf a 1 0 LD \S� 4 7' N�o SAND 5UAVE'13 ro EE A vAUD nut can N 00 \ 7 23 67• `�. ,c zo.4 2 LI 11 IF 11"ON OSE WH THEAIL tun � 6' 5T DATE : SEPT. 2511999 YOUNG 8 YOUNG cn.Y rA , IF. Hoa WHOM . n 23 55 SCALE : I " - 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE.E RIVERHEAD, N.Y. "5 LE CO I' ANO ON HIS LLNALI ID In 'IRE . INSTIY, ..1ST. II AGENCY n� EIAING INE11iV110N LIStfO HnEON, ANO ,p , N 0 THE ASSIaNEEi Or THE ".ING u¢TN --WL'°d\/ �.�'20 6 �2.9 ��` N0. � 85 -1482 ALOE N W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. BE. 0 L.9 LIC. N0. 12848 unaN GUAnuufes SEE r,oT NOIJSFE4An1 HOWARD W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC. NO.45893 O ADDITIONAL M4,TNr10.n OS SI.I"ODEAII N'OorvcY T . 50038