HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-121.-4-8 THE W47ER SUPPI Y AND SEWAGE
OPOSAL D
SYSTEMS FOR THIS RESIDENCE WIL&ONFOR41'
TO THE STANDARDS OF THE SLIFFOLJCOLIN7-Y
DEPT OF HEALTH SE17VICES
PROP
BLDG.
900 E R
6
GA L 0
SEPTIC 0
T
A 1vK PRO
AE r AfAP
L,R 300 50 Fr
0
25' ROW
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN 00 0
rF s r H04 ES
2 3 40 5. 111, 1(
I TOPSOIL 70PSOIL 7�7TSAAVY LOAM
3 S4NDY LOAM SANOr LOAM
4 1Z 7z
SAND 0 GAAVEt Q�
1,9 28.
po
7 111
SANO
SA NO
SAND n C)
ACR
15' 14,5
16 , vv
CM
c8cs wl
C6 Lei
1210 2 0 pcl�,� �ST HELL rH, J,
6.63 21Z,9D' r--489.01
L6,60 SON
It,M WER 0 4 V,4 4 ED DIR7
A. 0/ 15 '0
1?0�� 1-00 0�
Of
'I ,
N go'I
140fiO
G
5r
056
RECEIWD By
011 T�51 Sgggg 1OWN pLANKIN HARD
.49' 0 f 2LL-9AH4--
�9,-138 DATE
0 Lf
FOL
91
496. )OR EL IMINA R tv
7�> PLAN OF PR0P0S4`D
p POY, MINOR 51146,01VI5101�
110 F4RH&
01
M SOVTONLP - 4 -
IINDOWN FARAIS
Q% 011111 -6 ?4-06 APPROVED By
'Z A7' MA771TUOr
1 201. pLANNING BOARD
-OWN
6 7 OF SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SO1JTHO1
SUFFOL )"r CO
olVr DATE
0 NIF SA ypr
11� Ot FEND ROW-10-09-64
ADDITION IYO-10-02-84
Tf5r haEs - .9-12-84
100
I SAYR
donack associates
AVTE : I land surveyors and
N MES IAC CONTOURS TAffEN FROM SUFF01,11 ONTY ORW AERIAL MAPS. conwiting engineers
Mfrs 110 MONUMENT FOUND 313west main street
AREA 1, 199,143 -" OVk-RHE4D WIRES riverhead , new york 11901
27,5285 ACIYES'
(516) 369-1717
May 4 , 1984 Job N9134 -476
1000-121-04-08 Scale : 1 100'
ivEU
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this d6g)"day of 198% by
JOSEPH STEIFER and PATRICIA STEIFER, residing at (No number)
Leonard Street , Wading River, New York 11792, hereinafter
referred to as "Declarants".
W I T N E S S E T H
,QN11
'11K WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners in fee simple of a
tract of land at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New
York, shown on a certain subdivision map entitled "Preliminary
K� Plan of Proposed Minor Subdivision, Sundown Farms, at Mattituck,
Town of Southold , Suffolk Co . , N.Y." , a metes and bounds
description of which is shown on Schedule "A" as attached hereto
p r e m i s e s
and made a part hereof, and referred to herein as the
X4 1
and
WHEREAS , the Declarants have made application to the
Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to subdivide
the said real property into four parcels, and
WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said
approval , the Planning Board of the Town of Southol-d has deemed
7
it to be for the best interests of the Town of Southold and the
owners and prospective owners of said parcels that the within
IS4covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcels , and as a
condition of said approval said Planning Board has required that
the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's
office, and
WHEREAS , the Declarants have considered the foregoing and
determined that the same will be for the best interests of the
Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcels,
NOW, THEREFORE,T11IS DECLARATION WITNESSETH:
That the Declarants , for the purposes of carrying out *the
intentions above expressed, does hereby make known , admit ,
publish , covenant and agree that the said premises her(
009F4
described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants
which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all
purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors,
legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to
wit :
1. That there shall be no further subdivision of the lots
shown as numbers 2 , 3 & 4 on said subdivision plan , in
perpetuity.
2. That any further subdivision of lot numbered 1 on said
subdivision plan will be considered a major subdivision and shall
not exceed four (4) lots .
3. That , except as set forth in paragraphs numbered 1 and 2
above , Declarants reserve the right to impose additional
covenants and restrictions , and further reserve the right to
STATE OF NEW YORK
ss.:
County of Suffolk
1, JULIETTE A. KINSELLA, Clerk of the County of Suffolk and Clerk of the Supreme Court Of
the State of New York in and for said County (said Court being a Court of Record) DO
HJ�REBY CERTIFY that I have compared the annexed copy of
q, 9!6 11� I and
and that it is a just and true copy of such original
of the whole thereof.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said
County and Court this day of %,7 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Clerk..
12-109:1/64
F SUFFOLK
day of 19 before me personally came
S
Steifer and Patricia Stei�elr , to me known to be the
uiduatls described in and who executed the foregoing
rum
r TO ent, and acknowledged th t th ted the same.
o0,50w` (No n r�r Plu 5 100tr)
""LIAM. H PRICE, JR
NOTARY PUSLIC State of New.varl;
No�4644944 Suffolk county
farm Expires'March 30,1985
TOWN CMIM
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Suffolk County, New York 516 - 765.1801 No 20044 -
Southold, N. Y. 11971q
RELIVED OF,_ -�5�� �=_,_ " , c <L .
;4t '
_IIopaee :
For
—7,_ .K
1 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
Cash ❑ Ckeek c"
e. .b(t72 77Yx�/
TOpN �.�.w._.-
TOWN OF SOUTHOID
Suffolk County, New York 516 - 70i, N? 13867 -
RECEIVED OF L` r Souiliold, N. Y. 11971 1 tT 19
•ya
For Dollars s�b-7�.
!
Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk
1 Cash p Check
0
( MINOR SUBDIVISION /I� c
\ 1.11/ copies sketch plan received �D �OPIQA meld
spot elevations '
' \ sent to Planning Board
2 . Meet with Planning Board
3 . Required changes sent in writing
V 4 . New submission received _
5. Approval of sketch plan tie'
6. Sent letter with resolution approving /
7 . Application an fee V
If corporation, affidavit of ownership
J 6 copies of final map
Covenants and restrictions _
, J
Description of property 4
jNote on plat that sanitation ans water facilities
meet County Board of Health specifications v
/.,
Developer attend meeting (official submission)
W
8 . Public Hearing (within 45 days) �[
Advertised__el— Affidavits of publication received
9. Action by Planning Board (within 45 days) _
10. Sent to County Planning Commission
'Ij Received County' s recommendations �
qC 11. Filed covenants and restrictions received
12. Authorization and signing of map r
i
Page 7 11/5/84
Norkus c ntT
as well '. s , c6rrespondencefrom the applicant� requesting that
Conditio No- 4 of the County's decision be overridden, by .the
Board. ond tion No. A stated that "a conservation or scenic
easement hav nq a minimum width of 50 ' shall be establ'ished
along th up .and side of , the tidal wetlands along Cedar Beach Harbor
to insur thtt :no 'development adverse to the aesthetic quality
of the s' ore .ine I will take place along the shoreline. " The Board
noted thX tt,is question has� come before in previous subdivisions ,
and ther wai a que.stion .as. to� the County' s definition of a
con serva ion or scenic easement. It was the. consensus 'of the
Board to request clarification from the applicant regarding
his requ st,. as w,ell as, an indication as to what he proposes ,
to build in the area of the easZent.
on a motion made by Mr., Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that whereas, a formal I application forthe approval of
a subdivisiom .plat entitled "Sundown Farms1! located at Mattituck
was subm tted to the Planning Board on June 12, 1984 and filing
fee of $ 00 was paid on October 5t .1984 , and
WHEREAS a pu iic hear' ing- was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on October 22., 1984
at 7 :45 p.m. , and
WHEREAS , the requirements of the Subdivision :Re-gulations of the
Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and
application,
NOW, the
t #efo ,e, be it resolved that the application of Joseph
and Pa r gia Stsifer to be known as "Sundown Farms" for approval
of said 4ubdivision plat *prepared by Donack Associates dated
May 4 , 1 8 4 and amended Sept. 12, 1984 , October 2, 1984 'and
October 9, 1984. be approved and the chairman be authorized to
endorse approval on said subdivision plat subje6t to the following
conditions :
1. FilLng of the wvenants and r.estrictions as prepared by
the Town Attorney with the County Clerk
2. Re I vLew by the Suffolk County Planning Commission of the
sublivision plat.
Vot of the Board: Ayes- Orlowski, Latham, Ward
Philip Scire The Board reviewed this subdivision which had a
final hearing. It was noted that the covenants andrestrictions
as to no further subdivion on Lot I in perpuity, requested at
the hearLng, had not been submitted. It was the consensus of
the Board to hold action on this application until the
covenanto and restrictions were submitted and approve d by the
Town Attorney.
P6
ONGIONI & BORRELLI MIS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
403 FRONT STREET - P.O.SOX 562
GREENPORT.NEWYORK 11944-0662
TEL.(516)477-2048 - FAX(516)477-8919 7 MUCHMORE LANE
MARIE ONGIONI EASTHAMPTON,NY 11937
CARMELA L.RORREU-1 TEL.(516)324-5209
FAX(616)324-7521
March 17, 1998
Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold,New York 11971
Re: Barbara Kujawski - Laurel Lake Road
SCTM#1000-121-4-8.2 and 8.3
Dear Members:
Please refer to my letter of January 12th which in turn referred to a meeting with
the Board, myself and my client, Barbara Kujawski, on December 9, 1997.
1 have made several telephone inquiries of the Planning Department since my
letter of January 12th in an attempt to determine if any of the actions discussed at the
December 9th meeting have taken place. Unfortunately, the answer to my inquiries
continues to be that the matter is scheduled for decision and/or action but no decision
and/or action has occurred as yet.
As you know, a proposed agreement between my client and the title insurer has
been held in abeyance pending some action by this Board to attempt to resolve the
problems regarding Laurel Road and access to my client's property. Your assistance in
resolving this matter has been sought as a last attempt at an amicable resolution without
the need for litigation against the Town. However, we have now waited three months for
assistance from the Board with no action as yet having been taken. I am afraid that it'we
do not hear from the Board in the near future we will have no alternative but to proceed
re,ze.34 C3) gjx?jq8 ,s,
512M IT? S?Cke -t� C.-?,0410 1%;,70k�) NW V Pa teo,e"%&&(Z WS Dlkscorse
\NeQ C%%e�*
Va
�e"Q� c11V`I`1 v\ew (20.A . W 1990
W& Southold Town
Planning Board
under the assumption that the Town will not be of any assistance and litigation is
inevitable.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
clb/ns By:(',
Carmela L. Borrelli
cc: Barbara Kujawski
kujawski:pbflup2Atr
0 5146e
0415
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
403 FRONT STREET - P.O.BOX 562
GREENPORT,NEWYORK 11944-0662
TEL.(516)477-2048 - FAX(516)477-8919
MARIE ONGIONI 7 MUCHMORE LANE
CARMELA L.SORRELLI EAST HAMPTON,NY 11937
TEL(516)324-5209
FAX(516)324-7521
January 12, 1998
Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold,New York 11971
Re: Barbara Kujawski - Laurel Lake Road
SCTM#1000-121-4-8.2 and 8.3
Dear Members:
On December 9th my client, Barbara Kujawski, and I met with you to discuss the
"Catch 22" predicament she finds herself in with regard to access over Laurel Lake Road
and the issuance of a building permit for her property located along that road. As we
discussed at that time, your Board has previously advised that certain roadway
improvements must be made to the road before a building permit could be issued despite
the fact that the Supreme Court in Suffolk County has determined that my client has a
right of way over the road. As we also discussed,we have been unable to obtain
authority from Mr. Macari for improvements over that portion of the road that is on his
property.
On December 9th you advised that one of your members would attempt to speak
to Mr. Macari to determine if his cooperation could be obtained. Additionally, you were
to speak with the Town Attorney to determine if any relief from the code and/or prior
Planning Board determinations could be had to give my client some relief from what has
turned out to be conditions which she cannot meet.
I would very much appreciate your advising the status of your discussions with
Mr. Macari and the Town Attorney. As I mentioned at our meeting, we have a proposed
agreement pending with the title insurer of my client's property which we hesitate to enter
14 as
W---j
$DUTHOLD TOVJ j
714-'i,t
P L A NTNHI ON G78TC A�7R14)
�s.�yF�^"- �l� .
1
I 5
± ��::
� � , � t5j���.
...a!
into if this matter can be brought to a conclusion without the possibility of future
litigation.
Thank you for your courtesy and attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
clb/ns By: �Gvw C
Carmela L. Borrelli
cc: Barbara Kujawski
kujawski:pbfolupAtr
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
RIC14ARD G.WARD
Cha:rman P.O. Box 1179
co
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHANL JR. at Southold, New York 11971
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR Fax (516) 765-3136
cp
WILLIAM J. CREMERS 4, Telephone (516) 765-1938
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
October 29, 1996
Carmela L. Borrelli
403 Front Street
P.O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
RE: Access Road for Sundown Farms Subdivision
SCTM# 1000-121-4-8
Dear Ms. Borrelli:
Enclosed please find a copy of a letter dated October 17, 1996, which the
Planning Board received from Deborah Doty in regard to the above
mentioned subdivision.
Please address this letter when you address the questions raised in Mr.
Richter's June 26, 1996 report.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Piro
Meliss piro
Planner
encl.
cc: James Richter
Deborah Doty
DEBORAH DOTY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
670 WEST CREEK AVENUE
P.O. Box 1181
CUTCHOGUE,NY 11935-0876
FAX 516-734-7702
516-734-6648
October 17, 1996
Planning Board
Town of Southold
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
RE: Barbara Sayre, Laurel Lake Road, Mattituck, NY
Access Road for Sundown Farms Subdivision
soUlHOLD TOWN
Dear Members of the Board: MANNI B"
I represent Barbara Sayre, one of the property owners on Laurel Lake Road. This
letter concerns the matters covered in James A. Richter's June 26, 1996 letter to the Board.
We apologize for our delay in commenting on the contents of the letter. However, we only
recently received a copy.
As a preliminary matter, Ms. Sayre does not wish to continue an already protracted
dispute. Nonetheless, Ms. Sayre is concerned that the property which she owns will be
unreasonably and improperly burdened by the decision of the Board.
As stated by Mr. Richter and as evidenced by the enclosed survey, the travelled road
extends beyond the subject right-of-way and encroaches on Ms. Sayre's property. Please
note, however, that the right-of-way on the survey and in the deed is only 20 feet wide and
not 25 feet wide as stated in Mr. Richter's letter.
The Board also should be advised that Court's decision, dated July 24, 1995, stated
that the plaintiff (Mr. Dames) could not prevent the defendants from using the portion of the
right-of-way which traverses his property as shown on the survey (see p. 12, lines 21-25).
The Court did not grant the defendants the right to use the travelled road to the extent that it
is located outside the boundaries of the right-of-way.
Ms. Sayre and the other property owners whose land is burdened by the right-of-way
never were made parties to the litigation between Mr. Dantes and defendants. Accordingly,
the Court's decision is not binding on those other owners.
DEBORAH DOLS'(cox wuw). •
Planning Board - Town of Southold
October 17, 1996
Page 2
Without prejudice to her rights and as she previously has suggested, Ms. Sayre
recommends that the Board require that all road improvements be made within the right-of-
way. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
Deborah Doty
Encl.
DD:bdr
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
RICHARD G.WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Chainnan P.O. Box 1179
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. cz Southold, New York 11971
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,jR. CA
U� Fax (516) 765-3136
WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938
KENNETH L.EDWARDS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
June 27, 1996
Carmela L. Borrelli
403 Front Street
P.O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
RE: Access Road for Sundown Farms Subdivision
SCTM# 1000-121-4-8
Dear Ms. Borrelli:
Enclosed please find a copy of James Richter's report dated June 26, 1996,
in regard to the above mentioned subdivision. Please address the questions
raised in the report.
If you have any questions regarding the report, please feel free to
contact me.
Since:pely,
Melissa Spi4rr-�-
Planner
cc: James Richter, Engineering Inspector
RAYMOND L. JACIIIS JAIVES A. RICHTER,
SUPERINTENDENT
SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING INSPECTOR
PECONIC LANE, PECoNIC, N.Y.
F�. (516)-765-1750 Tel. (516)-765-3070
OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
JUNE 26, 1996
Richard G. Ward
Chairman - Planning Board
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Southold, NewYork 11971
Re: SUNDOWN FARMS
Sound Avenue, Mattituck
SCTM #: 1000-121-04-08 91,' 2 T 19%
Dear Mr. Ward:
The required improvements to the existing right-of-way and the actual traveled road
adjacent to the above referenced subdivision has been discussed at length. Legal
proceedings have also been conducted to verify who has the right to use this existing road.
A review of the file indicates that some road improvements to the existing road would be
required by the Planning Board as a condition of final approval of this subdivision. The two
major items required at that time were to widen the roadway to a minimum of fifteen (115')
feet and to provide a two (2") inch compacted lift of 3/4" stone blend over the entire length
of the road.
The right-of-way (ROW) for the existing road runs basically north to south as you
enter the site. The recent map that has been submitted for review indicates that portions
of the actual traveled road surface extend out to the west beyond the limits of the 25' ROW
for most of its length. The existing traveled road also turns to the west before it reaches
the last lot within the subdivision. As I understand it, the recent court proceedings and
subsequent decision grants the use of the existing traveled road to the owners within this
subdivision. Does that decision include the encroachment onto other properties over the
entire length of the road? Does this decision also grant access to the fourth lot by way of
the existing dirt driveway at the turn in the existing road? These questions should be
addressed before any new work is done.
Page 1 of 2
Richard G. Ward JUNE 26, 1996
SUNDOWN FARMS
SCTM #: 1000-121-04-08 Page 2 of 2
1 have been asked by your office to review construction requirements with Mr. Artie
Foster, a local contractor, under the following conditions. The existing traveled portion of
roadway, in its current location, will stay where it is. Further, this road can be widened to
accommodate the 15' width requirements. (NOTE: All proposed widening of the existing
road will be to the east within the existing 25' ROW.) With this in mind, several utility poles
will need to be relocated. The cost of work to do this, while still maintaining service to
existing customers, will need to be coordinated with L.I.L.C.O. Mr. Foster will be preparing
estimates for clearing the trees and brush, providing fill for widening the road and providing
the 2" compacted lift of stone blend on the entire road. This will include an improved
section of roadway that must be extended from the traveled road to reach the fourth lot in
the subdivision.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office.
rely,
James A. ichter, R.A.
cc: Raymond L. Jacobs
(Superintendent of Highways)
Art Foster
MS
Submission Without a Cover Letter
Sender: Cc-"m la �3or�il , )
Date:
Subject: rbarq �U�awsK�
SCTM#: I2. 1-`i - 8.1 18. 2- , 8. 37 8 Y
Comments: I Plan
Aa-
ligs
SA-
Jill
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS
Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Serge Doyen,Jr. coo P.O. Box 1179
James Dinizio, Jr. Southold, New York 11971
Robert A. Villa Fax(516)765-1823
Lydia A.Tortora Telephone (516) 765-1809
BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 25, 1996
Carmela L. BorreW, Esq.
403 Front Street
P.O. Box 562 Uri
Greenport, NY 11944 U MAR 2 6 1996
Re: Sundown Farms Subdivision --J
Dear Ms. BoreW:
This is in response to your letter dated March 18, 1996, and
hopefully it will be of some assistance to you. We understand that
your inquiry is whether the Planning Board will be able to exercise
sole jurisdiction over the "proposed access" route to the two rear
lots in the Minor Subdivision of Sundown Farms.
The ZBA does not have jurisdiction under the circumstances
raised in your March 18, 1996 letter, however, the ZBA could be
involved at a future date when a building permit application is filed
with the Building Department and wherein the road is not built as
required by the Planning Board, or new circumstances may change
the project. Since the lots may not be built upon until sufficient
access is built, that is, as required by the Planning Board, it is
recommended that the property owners continue pursuing same
through that same department. (Note: If the road is not built and
accepted by the Town, the ZBA may be deemed as the appropriate
alternative. ) Regardless of which route, or which town department
is involved, the road improvements must be sufficient for fire and
other emergency vehicles at all times, and improved satisfactorily to
a width of 16 feet (or more), as well as other specifications, and
updated on a continuous basis.
The Planning Boarrd is the only town agency which has had
.ftirisdiction on this minor subdivision, and as part of the
subdivision approval, the Planning Board was, and still is,
empowered to authorize access to the lots within the subdivision as
part of its approval.
If, however, at some point iia time the owners (or subsequent
owners) make changes to the project and do not build the access
required (or amended possibly in the future) by the Planning Board,
then the ZBA could be asked by the Building Inspector, as an
Page 2- Carmela Borle, Esq.
Re: Access/Sundown Farms Subdivision
alternative (under New York Town Law, Section 280-A), at the time
the Building Inspector receives a building permit application.
Since there is no definitive plan confirmed or offered with your
March 18th letter, we recommend it be done to show the proposed
traveled, cleared route, improved specifications of the road base,
location of trees, etcetera. If you submit this to the Planning
Board and the route is constructed as per their requirements, then it
would be solely the Planning Board's determinati n as to whether or
not the access is sufficient for access by fire and emergency
vehicles, etc. to the two rear lots in the subdivision.
(Note: Building permits for lots 'outside the perimeter of a
subdivision' are deferred to the ZBA for updated access improvements
by the Building Inspector, except when a route is already accepted
by the Planning Board in a subdivision review process or shown on
an official planning map.)
Under the circumstances, you should proceed through the
Planning Board as the sole agency involved in this application, and
when appropriate, the Building Inspector for final approvals on the
two proposed rear lots.
Very truly yours,
GERARD P. GOEHRINGER r 4&)
cc: Melissa Spiro, Planner/ CHAIRMAN
1b
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
403FRONTSTREET - P.O.BOX562
GREENPORT,NEWYORK 11944-0562
TEL.(516)477-2048 - FAX(516)477-8919
MARIE ONGIONI 7 MUCHMORE LANE
CARMELA L.SORRELLI EAST HAMPTON,NY 11937
TEL.(516)324-5209
FAX(516)324-7521
March 25, 1996
Ms. Melissa Spiro
c/o Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold,New York 11971
Re: SCTM#1000-121-4-8.2 & 8.3
Dear Melissa:
I am in receipt of your letter of March 14th with its enclosure. I have written to
the ZBA requesting a definitive statement as to whether or not they will exercise
jurisdiction over the matter of access to my client's lots. A copy of that letter is enclosed
for your records. As you know, before we can address matters involving the court
decision and determine a bottom line cost figure, we must have a definitive statement as
to which Board in Southold Town will be exercising jurisdiction and then determine what
is required by that Board.
My client and I welcome your offer to visit the site with the Engineering
Inspector. In this regard, Deborah Doty who is the attorney for one of the adjacent land
owners would probably like to attend at the site inspection. Please advise if we can
arrange this review as soon as possible because, as I have previously advised,there is a
pending appeal with regard to the.recent court decision involving these properties and
MAR 2 6 1996
decisions regarding that appeal must be made shortly.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
clb/ns By: CF.L C
enc.
cc: Barbara Kujawski
Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, ZBA
Dollinger, Gonski, Grossman, Permut& Hirschhorn, Esqs. (w/encs.)
Deborah Doty, Esq.
kujamki:pbmgs2.Itr
0
1plel�
ONGIONI & BORRELLI Als
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
403FRONTSTREET - PO.BOX562
GREENPORT,NEWYORK 11944-0562
MARIE ONGIONI TEL.(516)477-2048 - FAX(516)477-8919
CARMELA L.BORRELLI 7 MUCHMORE LANE
EASTHAMPTON,NY 11937
TEL.(516)324-5209
FAX(516)324-7521
March 18, 1996
Mr. Gerard Goehringer
Zoning Board of Appeals
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
Southold,New York 11971
Re: A=ss to SundoMM]Earms Subdd vision
Dear Gerry:
I am in receipt of a copy of an "Informal Memorandum" from your office to
Melissa Spiro of the Town Planning Department with regard to the above matter.
I am the attorney for Barbara KuJawski who owns property in the above
subdivision and has been involved in litigation regarding rights of way and access to her
property. A recent court decision gave Barbara a right of way over the existing Laurel
Road(Way) and I have been endeavoring to determine what will be necessary in terms of
improvements to that roadway to enable Barbara to eventually obtain a building permit
for her property. In this regard I have requested written confirmation from the Planning
Board that they and not the Zoning Board of Appeals will be exercising jurisdiction in
order to avoid the possibility of conflicting determinations at some later date. Your
"informal memorandum" of Match 13, 1996 does not specifically state that the ZBA will
defer to the Planning Board in this matter. I would very much appreciate receiving
written confirmation from you that the ZBA will not exercise jurisdiction but rather will
defer to the Planning Board in this matter.
For your information, we are under the time constraints of a possible appeal of the
aforesaid decision in the prior litigation and are attempting to determine what must be
r
D
qr
91996
done to the road before the time expires to appeal. The title company's attorneys have
advised that "time is of the essence" in this matter and your prompt response would
therefore be greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI, ESQS.
clb/ns By: (I
Cannela L. Borrelli
cc: Barbara Kujawski
Dollinger, Gonski, Grossman, et al.
Melissa Spiro, Planning Department
kqjawski:zbamq.Itr
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7 MUCHMORE LANE
EASTHAMPTON.NEWYORK 11937
MARIE ONGIONI TEL.(516)324-5209 - FAX(516)324-7521
CARMELA L.BORRELU 403 FRONT STREET
P.O.BOX562
GREENPORT,NY 11944
TEL.(576)477-2048
FAX(516)477-8919
March 12, 1996
Ms. Melissa Spiro
c/o Planning Board
Town of Southold
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: SCTM#1000-121-4-8.2 & 8.3
Dear Melissa:
This will confirm my advice to the Planning Board at their work session last night,
that Barbara Kujawski needs to have a definitive statement from the Planning Board that it
has and will exercise jurisdiction over the matter of the road leading to her property. Asl
stated last night, a court decision has given Barbara and others a right of way along Laurel
Lake Road (Way). A decision on whether or not to appeal the court decision is pending
and before that decision is made we must establish first, who exercises jurisdiction of the
possible improvement of the road, and second, exactly what will be required with regard
to those improvements,
With regard to the second question, if as we assume, the Planning Board will be
exercising jurisdiction over this matter, it is essential that we determine, in detail, exactly
what will be required to be done to the road in order to enable Barbara to obtain a
building permit for her two lots. In this regard, we will need to know if utility poles will
be required to be moved, trees cut down, etc. in addition to the surfacing of the road.
As was mentioned at the meeting last night, Barbara's attorneys (for the title
company that insured her property) must have answers to these questions before the
12- 19%
PLANN�'
UL
deadline to file an appeal is past. It is therefore very important that we have answers to
these questions as quickly as possible.
Thank you, and the Board, for your assistance and cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
clbins By: y
Carmela L. Borrelli
By Mail & Fax
cc: Barbara Kujawski
Leslie A. Foodim, Esq.
Kuj awski:pbregmts.1tr
PLANNING BOARD MEMBES
RICHARD G.WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
Chaiman P.O. Box 1179
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. .4 Southold, New York 11971
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. W Fax(516) 765-3136
WILLIAM J. CREMERS Telephone(516) 765-1938
KENNETH L.EDWARDS
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
March 14, 1996
Carmela L. Borrelli
403 Front Street
P.O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944
RE: Access Road for Sundown Farms Subdivision
SCTM# 1000-121-4-8
Dear Ms. Borrelli:
Please find the following in response to your discussion with the Planning
Board at the March 11, 1996 work session and your letter of March 12,
1996.
T#E�- above mentioned subdivision received conditional final approval on
November 5, 1984, and was subsequently endorsed by the Planning Board
Chairman on December 3, 1984. During subdivision review, there were
questions raised as to whether or not the applicant had legal right to use
an existing road (Laurel Lane) which was shown on the subdivision map as
meandering over the west side of the subject property and the properties
located to the west of the subject property.
It appears that the applicant did not provide sufficient proof of access
during the subdivision review. Accordingly, a 251 right-of-way was shown
on the map within the subdivision boundaries to provide access to the lots
within the subdivision. However, although it is not specifically stated as
such in the record, it appears that this issue was left open ended in that
if the applicant provided proof of access over Laurel Lane, and made the
improvements outlined in the Road Inspector's various reports, then Laurel
Lane could be used to provide access to the lots within the subdivision.
After the subdivision was endorsed, the applicant made some improvements
to the existing travelled road, Laurel Lane. However, the road
improvements were not accepted by the Town. The inspection reports in
the file, which were adopted by the Planning Board, all recommend
additional road improvements.
Access approval (280-a) from the Zoning Board of Appeals was not
required during the time of subdivision review. You asked the Planning
Board at the March 11, 1996 work session which Board, the Zoning Board
or the Planning Board, had jurisdiction over the road requirements. I
discussed this with Linda Kowalski, Secretary for the Zoning Board of
Appeals, and received the attached response dated March 13, 1996, from
the ZBA Office.
Sundown Farms
March 14, 1996
Page 2
In regard to required road improvements for the subdivision, the Planning
Board has not changed its determination from that outlined in my April 5,
1995 letter. If your client is unable to improve Laurel Lane due to
restrictions imposed by the Court's Decision in regard to the property
boundary dispute, the right-of-way shown within the subdivision
boundaries must be improved. If you wish, an on site meeting with the
Engineering Inspector can be scheduled to review the location of the
existing road and the areas requiring improvements. A decision will then
be made as to whether a new map must be prepared showing the location
and width of the existing road, utility poles and all other related
easements.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
6es s a�1 Ir
Planner
encl.
cc: cNames Richter, Engineering Inspector
Zoning Board of Appeals
INFORMAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Melissa Spiro, Planner (PB Office)
FROM: ZBA Officl��J,��
DATE: March 13, 1996
SUBJEUF: Access to Minor Subdivision Fronting along a. Town Street
In response to your inquiries of yesterday, this will confirm tbal- I
have discussed the Same with the ZBA Chairman, and with the
following, we hope to be able to assist you in clarifying inquiries
from Carrnella Borelli, attorney for Barbara Kujawski, (and other
inquiries in the future) concerning jurisdiction of the two boards on
privnie roads:
*All applicable codes require minimum standards (at least 16'
improved width) for subdivision access and any other types of
access.
I I *When an application is received, or is pending under SEQRA
ror*a�subdivision, and either side of the ROW is within the boundary
of the subdivision, 2r when the property fronts along a town street,
the Planning Board retains jurisdiction (with the assistance of the,
Town Engineer's office) .
*Wlien a road or ROW is not within the boundary of the
subdivision and the property does not front along a town street, then
a
variance may be applied for since there is no alternative for
applicant to build a road.
*All roads and ROW must be built, we understand,,. for
subdivisions or other projects, before the subdivision is completed
and before a building permit is issued (ref. Town Law, Section
280-fi, etc. ) .
*h) all or the above situations, the minimum standards have been
For a minimum 16' improved width (or greater as may be determined
by the board) when two or more lots are using a single access.
We do believe that the Planning Board's requirements for the 16-ft.
improved width (25 ft. easement) are reasonable and necessary, since,
the land is available from the developer of the subdivision.
P.S. Has the P13 considered any ideas to relocate a 10' portion of
the 25 ft. width to be 10 feet on the meandering ROW, and the
remaining 15 feet within the bounds of the subdivision property?
This is only a th0UKIJ for an alternative, however the PB might want
Page 2 - March 13, 1.9
To: Melissa. Spiro
Re: Subdivisions on 'Town Streets
to consider it if it hasn't: already done so. This modification
should also be retained under Planning Board jurisdiction as part of
Ilie subdivision's requirements before its completion.
M�s
S08F
INFORMAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Melissa Spiro, Planner (PB Office) MAR 1 4 G%
J &4
FROM: ZBA Offic
L
DATE: March 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Access to Minor Subdivision Fronting along a Town Street
In response to your inquiries of yesterday, this will confirm that I
have discussed the same with the ZBA Chairman, and with the
following, we hope to be able to assist you in clarifying inquiries
from Carmella Borelli, attorney for Barbara Kujawski, (and other
inquiries in the future) concerning jurisdiction of the two boards on
private roads:
*All applicable codes require minimum standards (at least 16'
improved width) for subdivision access and any other types of
access.
*When an application is received, or is pending under SEQRA
for a subdivision, and either side of the ROW is within the boundary
of the subdivision, �Lr when the property fronts along a town street,
the Planning Board retains jurisdiction (with the assistance of the
Town Engineer's office) .
*When a road or ROW is not within the boundary of the
subdivision and the property does not front along a town street, then
a variance may be applied for since there is no alternative for
applicant to build a road.
*All roads and ROW must be built, we understand, for
subdivisions or other projects, before the subdivision is completed
and before a building permit is issued (ref. Town Law, Section
280-a, etc. ) .
*In all of the above situations, the minimum standards have been
for a minimum 16' improved width (or greater as may be determined
by the board) when two or more lots are using a single access.
We do believe that the Planning Board's requirements for the 16-ft.
improved width (25 ft. easement) are reasonable and necessary, since
the land is available from the developer of the subdivision.
P.S. Has the PB considered any ideas to relocate a 10' portion of
the 25 ft. width to be 10 feet on the meandering ROW, and the
remaining 15 feet within the bounds of the subdivision property?
This is only a thought for an alternative, however the PB might want
Page 2 - March 13, 199P
To: Melissa Spiro
Re: Subdivisions on Town Streets
to consider it if it hasn't already done so. This modification
should also be retained under Planning Board jurisdiction as part of
the subdivision's requirements before its completion.
DOLLINGER. GONSHI, GROSSMAN. PERMUT & HIRSCHHORN
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAw
ONE OLD COUNTRY ROAD
CARLE PLACE. NEw YORK 11514
MATTHEW DOLLINGER- LESLIE A.FOODtM
DENNIS M. GONSKI (5161 747 1010 MICHAEL J. SPITHOGIANNIS
FLOYD G. GROSSMAN... FAX (5161747-2494 JESSICA M SEIDMAN
MICHAEL PERMUT ALICIA R DEVINS
ALAN K. HIRSCHHORN BRUCE N.ROBERTS
MINDY WALLACH
RACHEL L HOLLANDER
'NEW YORK AND FLORIDA BAR
"NEW YORK,NEWJERSEY AND MENNRY�NIA BAR September 7, 1995 JEFFREY M SCHWARTZ
...NEW YORK AND PEN..YI.IA BAR
IRWIN M.MILLER
COUNSEL
Ms . Barbara Kujawski MARY ANN 0 ESPOSITO
Sound Avenue LEGAL ASSISTANT
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, New York 11952
Re : Dantes v. Stiefer, et al .
Our File No. 2716
Dear Ms . Kujawski :
Enclosed please find a copy of the Court/ s Decision in
connection with the above-referenced matter. A Judgment will be
submitted based thereon shortly. Please feel free to call me if
you have any questions .
Very truly y Urs;,,
�O
Lesl',16 A' Foodim-
LAF : lmm
2716kuj . ltr
Enclosure
�46
i
SUPREME COU• OF THE STATE OF NEW YOR•
SUFFOLK COUNTY
-------------------------------------X
CHRISTOPHER DANTES, DECISION OF THE
COURT
Plaintiff,
-against- INDEX NO.
87-5670
JOSEPH STIEFER, PATRICIA STIEFER,
MARILYN GATZ, and BARBARA KUJAWSKI,
a/k/a BARBARA ANN KUJAWSKI,
Defendant.
-------------------------------------X
July 24, 1995
Central Islip, New York
B E F O R E :
HONORABLE JOHN F. O'SHAUGHNESSY,
Judicial Hearing Officer
APPEARANCES:
BRUCE KENNEDY, P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiff
31 Greene Avenue
Amityville, New York 11701
DOLLINGER, GONSKI, GROSSMAN, PERMUT &
HIRSCHHORN, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
One Old Country Road
Carle Place, New York 11514
FRANK J. FEICCO, C.S.R.
OFFICIAL SUPREME COURT REPORTER
2
Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 [At approximately 10:05 a.m. , the
3 following occurred in chambers: ]
4 THE COURT: This is the matter of
5 Christopher Dantes against Joseph Stiefer,
6 Patricia Stiefer, Marilyn Gatz, and Barbara
7 Kujawski, also known as Barbara Ann Kujawski,
8 Defendants.
9 [No appearance by Counsel. )
10 THE COURT: This action concerns itself
11 with the dispute over right, title and
12 interest to a certain strip of land which
13 bounds the lands of the Plaintiff on its
14 easterly side and the lands of the Defendants
15 on its westerly side.
16 The Plaintiff, Christopher Dantes,
17 acquired title to certain premises at
18 Mattituck in the Town of Southold on June 13,
19 1985, by deed containing a metes and bounds
20 description. [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 1. ]
21 The Defendants, Stiefer, had previously
22 acquired title to certain lands adjoining the
23 Plaintiff to the east on November 8, 1994, by
24 deed containing a metes and bounds
�5 description. [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 12. ]
• 3
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 Thereafter, the Stiefer property was
3 subdivided into four [4] lots. Two of the
4 lots were sold to the Defendant Kujawski
5 [Plaintiff's Exhibits 14-15] , and one lot to
6 Defendant Gatz [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 161 .
7 The Stiefers retained one lot.
8 Subsequent to the commencement of this action,
9 the Stiefer property was conveyed to the
10 A.A.B.R. Facilities Holding Corp. 1.
11 Footnote.
12 It will be continued to be referred to
13 as the Stiefer property in this decision for
14 the reason that it has been so characterized
15 by the attorneys.
16 Decision: The Dantes property and the
17 Stiefer property both front on Sound Avenue
18 and are adjacent to each other along Dantes '
19 easterly boundary and a part of the Stiefer
20 westerly boundary. [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 17;
21 Defendants ' Exhibit A. ]
22 The Gatz and Kujawski properties lie to
23 the south of the Stiefer parcel and to the
24 southeast of the Plaintiff 's property.
25 The distances and directions in a part
4
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 of the metes and bounds description in the
3 StiefOr deed [Plaintiff's Exhibit 12] , does
4 not comport with the metes and bounds
5 description of the Dantes deed [Plaintiff' s
6 Exhibit 1] .
7 As a result thereof, there is an
8 apparent overlap of approximately fifteen (15]
9 feet created. Gatz and Kujawski are affected
10 because their deeds give them access to Sound
11 Avenue over the westerly twenty-five [25] feet
12 of the Stiefer parcel.
13 .The deed into Dantes [Plaintiff's
14 Exhibit 1] reserves a twenty [20] foot right-
15 of-way along the easterly boundary of his
16 property. There is a right-of-way running
17 along the westerly boundary of the Stiefer
18 property. There is also an existing roadway
19 or right-of-way commonly known as Laurel Lake
20 Road, which has been in existence for many
21 years and as used, traverses both the property
22 of the Plaintiff and the Defendants.
23 The Plaintiff has commenced this action
24 claiming to have superior title to the
25 disputed overlap and seeks his complaint to
• • 5
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 clear the rights of the parties with respect
3 to the premises in question and to enjoin the
' 4 Defendants from entering upon his property.
5 All parties acknowledge that the
6 Plaintiff has the burden of proving by a fair
7 preponderance of the evidence that the
8 Plaintiff has superior title to the disputed
9 area.
10 There were six witnesses who testified:
11 11 Christopher Dantes, the Plaintiff;
12 2] Barbara Sayre, a ptoperty owner to
13 the south of the Plaintiff;
14 31 Roderick Van Tuyl and Harry
15 Hillebrand, surveyors, testified for the
16 Plaintiff and,
17 51 Barbara Ann Kujawski, a Defendant,
18 and,
19 61 Kenneth H. Beckmann, a surveyor,
20 testified for the Defendants.
21 The lands of both the Defendants and the
22 Plaintiff are carved out of what had at one
23 time been larger tracts of land. The
24 Defendants ' lands can be said to descend from
25 lands once belonging to "Hallock" and the
6
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, at. al.
2 Plaintiff's premises appear to have descended
3 from lands once belonging to "Jazombek. "
4 The surveyor, Roderick Van Tuyl
5 participated in the survey of the Hallock
6 property in 1950, which survey was signed by
7 his father, Otto Van Tuyl. [Plaintiff's
8 Exhibit 21 and Record Page 133. ]
9 He is one of three surveyors who
10 testified at the trial.
11 The westerly line of that survey came
12 from a survey of property to 'the west of the
13 Hallock property and the easterly line came
14 from a survey of property to the east [Record
15 Page 136] . Four concrete monuments were set
16 to mark the boundaries of the property [Record
17 Page 1381 . In 1961, he prepared a survey of
18 property to the south of Hallock, C.A. Price
19 and Company [Plaintiff ' s Exhibit 22] .
20 The Price northerly boundary and the
21 Hallock southerly boundary are congruent,
22 although the Price parcel runs 16 feet further
23 west than the Hallock property. In the
24 northwest corner of the Price survey, there
25 are two monuments shown. (Record Page 1441
7
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 The easterly of the two monuments were set by
3 Van Tuyl in 1950. [Record Page 1441 The
4 other monument to the west is the boundary
5 between Price and Camp Molloy. [Record Page
6 1561
7 The Price and Hallock boundaries are the
8 same, except that Hallock' s property line at
9 that point was 16 feet to the east of the
10 Price parcel. [Record Page 145]
11 The monument which bounded the Price
12 parcel existed and was foundAby Van Tuyl when
13 he did the Hallock survey in 1950. [Record
14 Page 146]
15 In 1969, Van Tuyl prepared a survey for
16 one John Chrisona and is of some 63 acres to
17 the west of Hallock. [Exhibit 23; Record Page
18 149]
19 It is from this surveyed property that
20 the Plaintiff's land was taken. It has a
21 common easterly boundary with the Hallock
22 property (Record Page 151] . The monument
23 shown on the southeast corner of the Chrisona
24 survey is the same as that shown on the
25 southwest corner of the Hallock's survey.
8
Dantes vs. Stiefer, at. al.
2 Van Tuyl testified that the monument on
3 the northeast corner of the Plaintiff' s
4 property is the same monument as shown on the
5 Hallock survey. This testimony is supported
6 by the Plaintiff's surveyor, Harry Hillebrand
7 [Record Page 2701 and is found to be supported
8 by the surveying witness for the the
9 Defendant, Kenneth H. Beckmann [2 Record Page
10 86-87] ; although Beckmann did not think it the
11 same monument. [2 Record Page 1071
12 This monument is found'by this Court to
13 be the same monument described in both the
14 dead into the Plaintiff [Plaintiff' s Exhibit
15 and the deed into Stiefer [Plaintiff' s
16 Exhibit 12] . Although the deed says that it
17 runs 520.32 feet, it is "to land now or
18 formerly of Wirtz. " This is the land
19 immediately to the east of that of Stiefer.
20 The Donack survey, [Defendants ' Exhibit
21 Al shows a monument at the northwesterly
22 corner of the Wirtz property. This monument
23 was found by Van Tuyl and found by Hillebrand.
24 The Donack survey [Defendants ' Exhibit
25 Al also shows a monument at the southeasterly
9
Dantes vs. Stiefer, at. al.
2 corner of the Hallock property, which the Van
3 Tuylls survey [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 21] and the
4 Hillebrand survey [Plaintiff' s Exhibit 18]
5 confirm.
6 The surveyors all agreed on the courses
7 and distances along the southerly side of the
8 Hallock parcel until the last angle point.
9 The Donack survey and the Stiefer deed run 90
10 plus feet, and the deed says, "to land now or
11 formerly of Macari. 1' Van Tuyl has that
12 distance as 74.02 feet. It' is this
13 discrepancy which accounts for the westerly
14 boundary of the Stiefer property being set 16
15 feet to the west.
16 The Donack survey and the Stiefer deed
17 are found to be in error. Both survey and
18 deed run to lands now or formerly of Macari.
19 Macarils land goes to the monument set by Van
20 Tuyl in 1950. Van Tuyl set his monument based
21 on a 1949 Overton map. [Record Page 1971
22 This boundary conforms with granting of
23 LILCO easements in 1924 and 1925.
24 (Plaintiff's Exhibits 4 and 5]
25 The deeds from Stiefer to Kujawski and
10
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 Gatz are also found to be in error along the
3 westerly boundary.
4 The Plaintiff is entitled to a judgment
5 declaring him to be the owner in fee simple
6 absolute of the premises described in the deed
7 dated June 12, 1985. [Plaintiff's Exhibit 1]
8 2. The premises acquired by Stiefer in
9 a deed dated November 8, 1984 [Plaintiff' s
10 Exhibit 121 , does not include any of the
it premises described in the Dantes deed of June
12 12, 1985. '
13 In his complaint, the Plaintiff also
14 seeks to enjoin the Defendants from using the
15 right-of-way delineated on the easterly
16 portion of his property running in a northerly
17 direction to Sound Avenue.
18 A review of the record shows that when
19 Dantes purchased this property in 1985, he was
20 aware of the existence of the right-of-way
21 when he first inspected the property before he
22 signed a contract to purchase. He thought the
23 people living around the lake had a right to
24 use it. [Record Page 451
25 He is not aware of who was permitted to
Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 use that road. [Record Page 86]
3 Barbara Sayre, a witness who lives on
4 the dirt road called Laurel Lake Road to the
5 south of the Plaintiff and who has lived there
6 for 40 years (Record Page 891 has a right-of-
7 way running along the easterly side of her
8 property. [Record Page 94)
9 This is Laurel Lake Road. She described
10 the travel portion as a 10-foot wide dirt road
11 with grassy plots on either side. [Record
12 Page 97]
13 When Stiefer purchased the property in
14 the 80 ' s, he used the right-of-way as well as
15 Barbara Kujawski. The road has been used by
16 local people and it has gotten wider because
17 of traffic usage. (Record Page 110-112]
18 The people from Laurel Lake use the
19 road. [Record Page 115]
20 Ms. Sayre' s testimony that the Laurel
21 Lake people advise her when they are having
22 guests using the right-of-way is not credible.
23 [Record Page 117-118]
24 U.P.S. , telephone and other delivery
25 trucks use the road. [Record Page 119-1211
0 12
1 Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2 Roderick Van Tuyl, the surveyor
3 testified that the road has been there his
whole life. [Record Page 192]
5 Barbara Ann Kujawski testified that the
6 right-of-way was used heavily quite often by
7 localpeople. [2 Record Page 59]
8 The Plaintiff, Dantes, himself admitted
9 that he has used the right-of-way to visit
10 Laurel Lake. [Record Page 41]
11 Nowhere in the record is the use for
12 which the easement over Danies ' property was
13 created disclosed.
14 It must be concluded that although the
15 Plaintiff claims the right-of-way exists only
16 for the benefit of people with houses on
17 Laurel Lake Road, he has provided no evidence
18 of that claim. Consequently, he has failed to
19 sustain his burden of proof that the
20 Defendants are not entitled to use the right-
21 of-way as shown on the survey. [Plaintiff's
22 Exhibit 19]
23 Accordingly, the Plaintiff is not
24 entitled to enjoin the Defendants from using
25 the right-of-way.
• 12A
1
Dantes vs. Stiefer, et. al.
2
Submit Judgment on notice.
3
[At approximately 10:26 a.m. , the above
4 matter came to a close. ]
5
6 I, FRANK J. FEICCO, C.S.R. ,
do hereby certify that I
7 am an Official Court Reporter in the employ P y of the
8 Supreme Court, State of New York, that the foregoing
9 minutes were recorded by me and transcribed under my
10 --�
supervision and t at
11 y rP e, ccu and correct.
1
12
SANK J. FEI G(�, C.S.R.
13
Official Supreme Court Reporter
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
%%3FF04
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, Chairman C*
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
George Ritchie Latham, Jr. P. 0. Box 1179
Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, Now York 11971
Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516) 765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 5, 1995
Carmela L. Borrelli
Ongioni & Borrelli
403 Front Street
P.O. Box 562
Greenport, New York 11944-0562
RE: Sundown Farms
SCTM# 1000-121-4-8
Dear Ms. Borrelli:
At Barbara Kujawski's request, the Planning Board reviewed the road
requirements for the above mentioned subdivision. Access for the
subdivision must be in accordance with one of the following:
1 . A 16' road in accordance with Drawing Number 15-4 of the Highway
Specifications must be constructed within the 25' right-of-way shown
on the approved subdivision. Road and drainage plans must be
submitted for the proposed construction. In addition, a map showing
the location of the existing road (Laurel Lane), utility poles and
all other easements must be provided to show the relationship between
existing conditions and the proposed new road. The exact location of
the 16 foot road will be subject to review of the plan showing the
location of the existing road.
2. If the existing road (Laurel Lane) is proposed to provide access to
the lots within the Sundown Farms subdivision, proof of access over
this road must be submitted. In addition, if proof of access is
obtained, the existing road must be improved as follows to provide
access to the lots within the subdivision:
A. The road must be fine graded to remove any potholes;
B. A two inch (2")compacted lift of 3/4" stone blend must be added
to the road surface.
Sundown Farms
April 5, 1995
Page 2
In addition to the above, a map showing the location and veering
width of the existing road, utility poles and all other related
easements must be provided. Upon review of the map showing the
location of the existing road, the Planning Board will determine
whether or not the portions of Laurel Lane which are less than 15
feet in width must be widened.
Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above.
Sincerely,
Meli�i
pir
Planner
cc: James Richter, Engineering Inspector
Barbara Kujawski
enc.
SfrANDARD S'rONEE Br-END nOADWAW
Right-of-Way Right-of-Way
12' - 6
,,1, 12' 6"
1'-6" 3' 0" 0" RO AD S V-O". 1 -6"
ECTION!
V:V �(typical
4"
SLOPE 1:3 TOPSOIL
MAX. TO TO BE
EXISTING CLEARED
GRADE RAKED &
SEEDED
2" COMPACTED WEARING COURSE
3/4" STONE BLEND
FINE GRADE
6" COMPACTED BASE COURSE
EXISTING BANK RUN OR OT—HER
SUITABLE MATERIAL
NO SCALE
Prepared and Appe.ed By DRAWING
Reconanended By: S.p��I.t.ude.t of High.sy. NUMBER
JAMS A. RICHTER 4��. April 20, 199 15-4
ARCHITECT MIMNU L. JACOBS DATE
6-25-93
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
403 FRONT STREET P.O.BOX 562
GREENPORT,NEWYORK 11944-0562
TEL.(516)477-2048 FAX(516)477-8919
MARIE ONGIONI 288 PANTIGO ROAD
CARMELA L.BORRELU EASTHAMPTON,NY 11937
TEL(516)324-8282
FAX(516)324-8283
February 16, 1995
Ms. Melissa Spiro
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: SCTM #1000-121-4-8.2 and 8.3
Dear Melissa:
This will confirm our telephone conversation today wherein I advised you that this
office represents Barbara Kujawski the owner of the above captioned parcels.
As you know there is and has been quite a controversy regarding the road and
various rights of way giving access to this site and those along the existing road. I would
very much appreciate your advising the status of the Planning Board's review and
recommendations with regard to this road.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope you have a great vacation.
Very truly yours,
ONGIONI & BORRELLI
clb/ns By:
Carmela L. Borrelli
cc: Barbara Kujawski
1,ujawski:plbd.ltr
i
i
SOW 01-9 10"'IN
P LOAA
a.&YMCD-M]C) 3L . -TACOIBS TAM.IES A . a1CH-rBM , a . A -
SUPERINTENDENT. ENGINEERING INSPECTOR
SOUTHOLD TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Fax (516)-765-1750 (516)-765-3070
wo� ap 6��"�X.xx
DECEMBER 8, 1994
Richard G. Ward
Chairman - Planning Board
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re : SUNDOWN FARMS W N
Sound Ave . , Mattituck
SCTM: # 1000-121 -04-08 MC
SOUTH01 D TOWN
r
I LPLANNING PUARD
Dear Mr . Ward :
As per your- request , I have reviewed the file and performed a
site inspection of' the existing conditions within, and immediately
adjacent to, the above referenced subdivision . As you know, the
problem of who does or doesn ' t have the right of access across the
existing road has been a question that required legale proceedings
to answer .
A Planning Board letter to Mrs . Barbara Kujawski dated 4/21 /86
required that the road be located within the westerly 25 ' right-
of-way and that it should be improved to a 15 ' width . It is
unclear from the letter as to Wnether or not the Board considered
this location to be the same as the existing road . This letter
also referenced improvements in accordance with the recommendations
of the inspector, John W. Davis. A report from him dated 4/2/86
recommended that "additional stone blend be brought in to provide
a 2" compacted depth throughout . "
The existing surface of the road consists of a bankrun mixture
of sand and gravel that is relatively hard packed . The wearing
surface of the road is spotted with pot holes over its entire
length . The average width of the road varies dramatically
throughout its length from between 8 ' to 15 ' wide. One section ,
roughly 800 ' into the site, is about 20' wide which allows cars to
pass safely. Some of the required improvements indicated within
the inspectors reports could have been completed during that 1986
time frame. For instance, the existing road may have been widened
at certain locations but there is still a large percentage of the
road that does not meet the minimum requirement of the 15 ' width .
During my site investigation I did not seen any evidence of the 2"
compacted lift of blue stone blend that was also recommended by the
inspector and required by the Planning Board .
RICHARD G. WARD
CHAIRMAN - PLANNING BOARD DECEMBER8, 1994
At this time I would first recommend that the road be fine
graded to remove any potholes . I would also recommend that a two
inch (2" ) compacted lift of 3/4" stone Blend be added to the road
surface to comply with previous requirements . The widening of the
road in the narrow locations would require the removal of trees and
or the relocation of telephone poles. Adequate access does exist
for emergency vehicles as long as there are no conflicts with
vehicles traveling in the opposite direction . The question of
whether or not to widen all areas of the road to 15 ' should be
decided by the Planning Board .
If you have any questions concerning this report , please do
not hesitate to contact my office.
3in erely ,
I wl �6k
Richter , R.A.
a2
cc : Raymond L. Jacobs
(Superintendent of Highways)
t�.
• � �' oo
�U
1212 �
UU �
0 k
1994 DTOYVN JBOARD
PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS
Richard G.Ward, Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P. 0. Box 1179
George Ritchie Latham,Jr.
7 Southold, NewYork 11971
Bennett Orlowski,Jr.
Mark S. McDonald
Fax(516)765-3136
Kenneth L. Edwards
Telephone(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
A�'Jewken
James Richter, Road Inspector
Highway Department
Peconic Lane
Peconic, NY 11958
Dear Mr. Richter:
The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following application for
your review.
Application Name: A:�(ov-ea "&"�%�Oyv r�'rms
Tax Map No.: 1000- %-2-1- 4 - 9,
Street Location: s�-, ffi�j, -kZ.�&
Hamlet Location:
Type of Application:
Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated
Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated
Final Subdivision Map (Dated
Road Profiles (Dated
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated
Other (Dated—
Sketch Site Plan (Dated
Preliminary Site Plan (Dated
Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated
Other (Dated
As 6:sc.sspa, f.ZaAAQ ffu:d"� '�J7
L6'" �'Vvfi�") L� an 61�-
r: Jt
4
LIZ
Mv
I/I,G //
r
5 'J
r
ti.•�-+..,n�,1�./�� /i si 1.���J it/.// �-' / �
K
1
LAUREL LAKE P0^M7-n-1' r
April 21), 1994
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman
Re: SCTM: 1000-121-4-8.2; 1000-121-4-8.3; 1000-121-4-8.4
Dear Mr. Ward,
Our members have a right of way located immediately to the west of the above listed
plots.
The above plots were created when Joseph Stieffel subdivided his property sometime
during the early 1980's. When your board approved this subdivision, the approval was
granted with the condition that the right of way was to be improved with a proper
stone base. As of this date, no improvements of any kind have been made to the right
of way.
We have been advised that the above plots have been sold or are under contract for
sale and that the required improvements to the right of way have been waived or will
be waived by your board.
Please advise us if our information is correct in that building permits will be issued
without any improvements being made to the right of way.
Very truly yours,
LA]URE L PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Th . G rman
Se4crta
spoii� -k�
c4sk-
(Ils-bet re-.
cz -lr"�\t C� I I W R
c�
IV Cak\k Coo- C"(��C4e CAPR:2 1199:4 ]
04
So
MAS"IONT MEMO
SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON
Sidney B.Bowne.P.E.,L.S. Roland Anders
(1922-1959) Frank Capobianco
Chester C Kelsey. P.E.,L.S. 45 Manor Road Roger L Cocchi
Alexandre W.Mercil, P.E. Francis J Lynch
Robert A.Stanton,P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Philip Schotzhauer
Robert W. Brown,L.S. Joseph F Stedman
Zabdiel A.Blackman. P.E., LS. (516) 724-0611 BY pabf F stakbr,s
1-�i :7;�q Willthro T Styre
George A.Style. P�E Richard B Weber
Jerry D.Almont, P E
George L.Fagan,Jr, Ph.D., P E.
Thomas R. Pynchon. L.S.
August 25, 1987
Mr. Bennet Orlowski , Jr., Chairman
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Final Inspection, Sundown Farms/Joseph Steifer, Mattituck-Laurel ,'
Town of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87156)
Gentlemen:
A final site inspection pertaining to the access road construction
only, per Mr. V. Lessard, was conducted on August 20, 1987. Present
wee Mr. Raymond Dean and Mr. C.S. Heffernan, both from this office.
We find that material was imported to fill the potholes through the
first 250+' off Sound Avenue. This material was poorly graded (sand)
and as a result did not compact to form a stable riding surface (see
J.W. Davis report dated 10/19/84) . We recommend that this section be
reconstructed to attain an acceptable riding surface.' The remainder of
the access road (1750+) is acceptable at this time.
Very truly yours,
SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON
CONS LTING ENGIN ER�r
CORNELIUS S. EF R N
CSH:clg
xc: Ray Jacobs, Supt./Hwys.
Ray Dean (SBB)
V. Lessard (Building Dept.)
MINEOLA is SMITHTOWN 0 NEW YORK CITY CLEARWATER
An Equal Disponunity Employer M/FM
P LAA-.N N;1 N I '01-1�*D
T O�"� S 1�
T-N OLD
SCT F9*1
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
August 31, 1987
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, New York 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
access road
Dear Mrs. Kujawski:
Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from Sidney
Bowne & Son with regard to the above mentioned subdivision
access road.
The Planning Board requests compliance with their
recommendation, and asks that you advise our office upon
completion of the work.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
aulf UA 0A
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
PUA&NLN(,� fi-SAD
Lk
TOW-?i 0 SOU J�-QLD
�q
t
SCFFPAk� tMIT Y
�-A
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
Robert Brown
Sidney and Bowne and Son
Hauppague, NY 11787
Dear Mr. Brown:
Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold,
Town Planning Board hereby refers the following:
A lication of (Major subdivision, �Zi�n , site plan)
.�®r
, �subdivisio
Sux,daz-r) Zlc�n�--Ph \2 i
L
�AakU±U('L
Hamlet _ L_O_�
HATER T AL SUBMITTED: File #
Suf folk County Tax Map No. k000
Sketch plan
, Preliminary map
Street Profiles
Grading Plan
Preliminary site plan
Final Map X
Other 4n :rLm
Comments:
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
0
P 1.rwv�mbo
oA
T -Solt
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
May 29 , 1986
Mr. Robert W. Tasker
Town Attorney
425 Main Street
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: "Sundown Farms"
Dear Mr. Tasker:
Enclosed for your review is a copy of correspondence
received from Mr. Shepard Scheinberg, esq. with regard to
the traveled road and ,the above mentioned subdivision.
Also, enclosed are copies of the surveys for this
property - one map, surveyed by Donack, indicates a four-
lot subdivision and the other map by Van Tuyl does not.
As you can see there is a discrepancy between the two
surveys and the difference of approximately 151 means
that the traveled road is either within the subdivision
or not in the subdivision at all.
With regard to 280-a approval, the Planning Board
will not grant any approval until the discrepancy of the
traveled road is clarified, since the subdivision lot
owners would use this traveled road as access if they
have a right to.
Would you please advise our Board as to how to
proceed with this matter.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please
contact our office if you require any additional information
or if you have any questions.
Very truly yours ,
3ULru-tt 0. ccaaki.)
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
DMS
rNr
T rs-6 U JM
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
June 10 , 1986
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
PO Box 1113
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mrs . Kujawski:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, June 9 , 1986.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept
Inspector John W. Davis ' memorandum dated May 14, 1986 with
regard to the location Of common north-South property line
(Sundown Farms - West side) and the Dantes and Sayre property
(East side) , Sound Avenue, Laurel.
Enclosed is a copy of that report for your review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT 'ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD
TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
Memorandum to: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Date: May 14, 1986
Southold Town Planning Board
From: John W. Davis
Re: Sundown Farms at Mattituck - Location Of common north-south
property line (Sundown Farms-west side) and the Dantes and
Sayre property (East side)
Comments:
This section of the above property line survey ;f:as re-established today by
Donack as requested by Mrs. B. Kujawski. The DQnack plans dated 9/ 12/84
were used.
Today's survey was also witnessed by B. Kujawski', J. Stiefer and Mr. & Mrs. Sayre.
Mrs. Sayre has a property survey by Van Tuyl dated 2/26/85 that shows the
traveled way all within that property and the 20 ft. R.O.W. . The Donack survey
is considerably different as to the location of the common property line in this
area.
R. Van Tuyl, as requested by B. Kujawski, came i on the site in the P.M. after the
Donack survey party had left. He brought a survey map dated 5/25/50 (Map .of
farm owned by Mary E. Hallock) which covers the same area now known as Sundown
Farms. This map shows the north side of the property along Sound Avenue (named
North Road previously) at 505.53 L.F. instead of 520.32 ft. as shown by Donack,
a difference of almost 15 ft. This lesser length accounts for some of the
differences in the property lines (East side) at the Dantes and Sayre property
as shown on the Van Tuyl and Donack maps.
The correct length of the n6rth side (along Sound Avenue) for Sundown Farms '
should be determined. The lesser length, 505.53 ft. ) , would affect the total
length of Sundown Farms (west side) for location, total acreage, etc.
May 15, 1986
R. Van Tuyl gave me a copy of the 1950 Hallock Farm map. Comparision of the
two maps (Donack and Van Tuyl) show the difference in bearing and length at the
north side, a small difference in bearing and length in the last course (south
end) of the east side and a differ*ence in length of 16.94 ft. at the southwest
corner at the south end of the property. Donack shows 90.96 ft. , Van Tuyl
74.02 ft. This compares more or less with the difference in length of the two
surveys at the north end. All other dimensions and bearings are the same.
I reviewed the deeds from the Planning Board files, one for the Sundown Farms
and one for Lot No. 3. They both conform to. the Donack survey throughout.
Note: The length of 520.30 ft. (Donack) for the subdivision length along
Sound Avenue bas been circled in the subdivision deed. Others may have found
the discrepancy in the two surveys for that distance.
I would recommend that nothing be done as to updating the access to Sundown Farms
until the status of the common property line has been resolved.
G3��Joh
c�qjq)
PLJANNIN BOARD
T6w--N
SOU i ,7�LD
U � 1�- , i
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971!
p
(516) 765-1938
April 21, 1986
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mrs. Kujawski:
The Planning Board reviewed the file for the above mentioned
subdivision on Friday, April 18 , 1986 .
It was the consensus of the Board to request that the access
road for the lots within this subdivision be improved within the
25 ' right-of-way on the westerly side of the premises as shown
on the approved subdivision map of October 9, 1984 .
Please note, the right-of-way will have to be improved to
a 15 ' width in accordance with the recommendations of Inspector
John W. Davis.
Would you please stake out the right-of-way and advise
our office when this has been done so we may notify our Inspector.
Thank you.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours ,
&YL�0 q""
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CJH IRt��
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
cc: Rudy Bruer, esq.
A* 9 1986
To: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Report No. 495
Southold Town Planning Board
From: John W. Davis Date: April 2, 1986
Re: Sundown Farms - Minor Subdivision at Mattituck. Present condition
of access road from Sound Avenue to end of property.
Comments:
As of present date the road surface has been smoothed by Ray Nine (done
a few days ago) . The last 700 ft. of this access was not worked on.
The potholes were filled by scraping the road width with a grading box.
No additional material was brought in. According to Ray Nine this
grading operation was all that he was asked to do. His charge for this
work was $ 140.00. The existing road surface prior to any work by the
contractor who did the initial work in 1985 was hard packed in most
areas and had areas with potholes. I do not know when this initial
work was done or how much bankrun material was brought in. However
depths as per report by L. M. Tuthill on February 6, 1986 show an average
depth of 5.4" of bankrun, an average width of 11 ft.± and an average
stone blend depth of 1 .4". Six of the ten test holes show I" of stone
blend.
As of 4/2/86 the road is passable. The potholes that have been corrected
by the smoothing operation will occur again in wet weather as they are
now filled with loose material.
I agree with the Tuthill report of February 3, 1986 that widening the
road in the last 700 ft. to 16 ft. for the length and location as noted
in that report to provide passage for two vehicles.
I would not recommend final acceptance of this access road until addit-
ional stone blend was brought in to provide a 2" compacted depth throughout.
John W. Davis
4
LAWRENCE M. TUTHILL
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
I NLET �NE EXT,
FEES rREENPORT, N.Y. 11944
February 3, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re' Roads Of minor subdivision entitled "Sundown Farms"
off sound "venue, Mattituck
Gentlemen:
On January 31, 1986, Mr. John Davis and I made an
insvection of the above mentioned rroject.
It apreared that a minimum amount of work had been done
on this road. With reference toMr. "avis's rerort No. 400
dated Uctober 19,1984, the rotholes and derressions still ain.
rem
There is little evidence that the derth of the bankrun sand
and jzravel has been added to increase the depth to Drovide
a 6" bpse. There is evidence of a tor coverage of 3/4" stone
blend, but in the terms of Mr. Davis it is just a dusting.
It is noted that the last 7000 of this road is rather narrow
an it goes through the woods and it recormended that a 16,
wide road 30' long section be created about 2001 4 in from
the beginAng of the 700' so as to be in lot no. 4 to
provide passage for two vehicles.
Respectfully submitted,
076Y--( o� �Zjs-,
22
,� :13 84
TO: Benne*t Orlowski, Jr., Chairman REPORT �10. LOO
Southold Town Planning Board
FROM: John W. Davis DATE: October 19, 1984
RE: SITNDOWN FARMS - mINCR S!TBDIVISION AT I-TATTITTITCr - LATEST DATE (N 10AP 10/9/84
CONDITION OF EXISTING ROAD FROM SOUND AVE. T� END OF PROPERTY
COMMENTS:
1he road (noted as a 10 ft. traveled road) is somewhat in error. Attached is a copy
of the road widths down to about the last utility'ipole (2018 t ft.) from Sound Avenue.
Tlis from Report 369 dated 6/7/84 for the Board of Appeals.
Tie above length has been stabilized with sand and I gravel for de,..)ths of -from 211 to
1he profile is acceptable but there are potholes and depressions.throughout. Going 411.
south except for the first 25o ft.± there is a wooded area on the left side and open
land an the right side. 7his section would probably not present problems for emergency
equipment.
9he remaining length (700 ft.t ) is 8 ft.:t in width and in a wooded area throughout.
It has been stabilized with sand and small gravel. A few test holes indicated depths
of 311 . 7he profile is acceptable but there are a few irregularities. Most of this
length is below the adjacent ground level. In some areas the road sides slope up for
from 2 ft. to 4 ft. with trees near the top of the slopes. 7h" 700 ft. section of
the road is passable as of the present time. Emergency equipment would have to turn
around via driveways.
If the alignment of the present road is to be accepted for access even though parts of
it are in property owned by others, it should be renaired and updated.
I would recommend the following:
1. Fill the potholes and depressions in the first 2000 ft.t and bring in additional
bankrun sand and gravel to provide a 611 depth. 7he width for the first 250 ft.
would have to be 8 ft. 'A due to trees. The remaining 1750 ft.:t of 2000 could be
10 ft. in width or more.
2. The last 700 ft.4. should have the few high areas leveled and additional bankrun
brought in to also provide a 611 depth. Widening the present width would involve
grading and tree removal.
3. Place a compacted 211 top course of 3/411 stone blend on the bankrun for the full
length of the road.
CJOHNW.�AVIS
A
c�
AY
v1}%pC� I
vN tLez
1-a-
ir
77
OIL r
ccs
J
�� "a �'`'`�a�auQ ���PIP��•�cc�� i/ice.
ct C a 17Y - F �S .
C,4�
UNNIZODEVARNNO
LAUREL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS
BOX 1445, MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 11962
516-298-
April 20, 1994
Planning Board Office
Town of Southold
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Attention: Richard G. Ward, Chairman
Re: SCTM: 1000-121-4-8.2; 1000-121-4-8.3; 1000-121-4-8.4
Dear Mr. Ward,
Our members have a right of way located immediately to the west of the above listed
plots.
The above plots were created when Joseph Stieffel subdivided his property sometime
during the early 1980's. When your board approved this subdivision, the approval was
granted with the condition that the right of way was to be improved with a proper
stone base. As of this date, no improvements of any kind have been made to the right
of way.
We have been advised that the above plots have been sold or are under contract for
sale and that the required improvements to the right of way have been waived or will
be waived by your board.
Please advise us if our information is correct in that building permits will be issued
without any improvements being made to the right of way.
Very truly yours,
LAIURE$LPROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Th . G rman
Secr ta
S
e SS4 t
I **& -itecs.
A&�-eA Ar.
-f�er�*
:SD D'BM—N
G 0 W
MEN ARD
N,j PLANNING BOARD 22 MARCH 101991
SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Mr. Orlowski: Board to set Monday April 1, 1991 at 7: 30 p.m.
at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and
place for the next regular Planning Board meeting.
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. McDonald,
Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: I ' ll make a motion to approve the Planning
Board minutes of February 12 , 1991 .
Mr. McDonald: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham,
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Being as I have nothing left on my agenda. I
see Mr. Steiferis here, would you like to address the Board?
Joe Steifer: Mattituck. When I spoke to the Board the last
time I was here, the request was for C.O. ' s on the back
properties which, I believe, were taken care of. There were
C.O. 's available. I guess that was the raising of the question,
.I believe, by you Mr. McDonald.
Mr. McDonald: No, I can guarantee you that I did not raise that
question. However, I am interested, did you supply C.O. , s to
us? Vacant land C.O. 's?
Mr. Steifer: No, in other words I was under the impression
that you people had gotten them from the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: You can no longer get a vacant land C.O. .
Mr. Steifer: I am talking about a building C.O. and you can' t
get a building C.O. without access.
PLANNING BOARD 23 MARCH 1101991
Mr. McDonald: Well, that is what I am wondering, how would you
prove that you can get a C.O. until you 90 to put up a building?
Mr. Steifer: But the C.O. ' s are all available now.
Mr. McDonald: Where are they then?
Mr. Steifer: In other words, I would have to furnish them to
the Board? That was actually the question, and all of the back
three lots do have availability for a building C.O. on it, which
means there is an access route to it. This road was improved by
US. Even though we do not use it, because according to the
Planning Board and the Building Department, we weren' t to use
that road so we formed our own road on the east side of the
property which this new piece will come off of.
Mr. McDonald: You formed a driveway?
Mr. Steifer: Yes. 800 feet and the only difference would be,
that it is the one split, with no future subdivision on it,
because that will be retained as a farm and the new house will
be built off that driveway which I have furnished the plans
for.
Mr. McDonald: What have we determined about those back lots?
What do we know?
Ms. Spiro: I have nothing from the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: So we have nothing from the Building Department.
And was a 280A ever done on it? Or was that part of the
subdivision?
Mr. Orlowski: It is part of the subdivision. The road that
he improved was out of the subdivision.
Mr. McDonald: Well, it needs a 280A. You can' t do a road
outside a subdivision without a 280A so there should be a 280A
on this somewhere right? You need an approval from the ZBA for
improvement on the road.
Mr. Steifer: That was already done.
Mr. McDonald: A 280A exists?
Mr. Steifer: It does exist, otherwise there would not be
building permits available on the back lots.
Mr. McDonald: We don' t even know that though.
Mr. Orlowski: There are no building permits, we have nothing.
Mr. Steifer: O.K. , so I would have to furnish you with the
building permits?
PLANNING BOARD 24 MARCH lf 1991
Mr. Orlowski: Or the Building Department.
Mr. Steifer: I 'm sorry, I assumed that this was taken care
of . I had spoken to the Building Department and they said it
was taken care of. I will follow up on it.
Mr. McDonald: While this is certainly important, I don't want
to mislead you, but if You supply these it doesn' t necessarily
mean, and I don' t speak for the rest of the Board, but even if
you supplied these it doesn' t necessarily mean that I would say
O.K. , go ahead and put the road on the east side of the property.
Mr. Steifer: The road is already there.
Mr. McDonald: No, there is a driveway, there is no road. There
is a driveway that services a single and separate lot. You are
talking about turning it into several lots.
Mr. Steifer: No, I am talking about only adding one lot.
Mr. McDonald: O.K. , you are going to create two lots?
Mr. Steifer: Yes.
Mr. McDonald: There is one and you want two?
Mr. Steifer: The front one will be off sound Avenue.
Mr. McDonald: So a road could conceivably be necessary. You
could call it a driveway but it would still be considered a
road, and I don' t want to mislead you simple because you supply
that. I might not necessarily, and again I am not speaking for
the rest of the Board, and I haven' t decided yet either. But,
simply supplying them doesn' t necessarily mean I am going to say
that no, there is no road needed.
Mr. Steifer: What would be the purpose of the road?
Mr. McDonald: Well, that remains to be seen. That is one of
the reasons I am saying that I haven' t decided yet because I
have to look at the whole layout. You had a previous minor
subdivision?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: With a road with a 280A access over this rather
than actually a road, and I 've got to be honest ( stopped
talking) .
Mr. Orlowski: No, the subdivision originally granted was
approved with a road on Mr. Steifer' sproperty. The map was
signed showing the road on his property, and that is all we can
address. When it was done and approved the people or the person
buying a lot, in the back, came to this Board and said "I have
PLANNING BOARD 25 MARCH 101991
no access to my property" . The Board says, "Mr. Steifer, in
this subdivision it shows that there is a road on this property
that has to be improved by somebody" , she says, I cannot get to
my property, I am involved in litigation. I cannot get building
permits, I cannot get anything. In effect, I have bought a land
locked piece of property. We assured her that it is not because
she has access over to the property, that is suppose to have
been built but was never built on your property because you
improved the access road or right-of-way, which is not in the
subdivision. That is out of our jurisdiction completely.
Mr. Steifer: We improved the road that the Town Board
requested us to improve on the property now.
Mr. McDonald: On your property?
Mr. Steifer: It was on the map. We improved the road that
the Town Board had requested us to improve on the map. It was
part of the property on the map and the -Town Board says, you
will have to improve it, otherwise, no subdivision would be put
and there was a vast amount of money spent on this road.
Mr. McDonald: And that is the road that presently exists and
leads into Laurel Lake?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: How many lots are there in the first subdivision?
Mr. Steifer: Four, an average of twenty- eight acres.
Mr. McDonald: So an additional lot, would make you a major?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: Usually, at that point, we would insist on
improving it to the road standards.
Mr. Steifer: But, we are not allowed to travel that road.
Mr. McDonald: Why not?
Mr. Steifer: According to the Town and the Building
Department, we have no access on that road and we have to stay
off. That is why a driveway was put on each side of. the
property.
Mr. McDonald: You don' t own that property?
Mr. Steifer: Whether I own it or not, I was not permitted
access on it by the Town Board or the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: Do you know if you own it?
PLANNING BOARD 26 MARCH 110,991
Mr. Steifer: According to My map that I just furnished, yes
and this was not done byDanok, this was done by a second
surveyor. As a matter of fact, I believe that the mortgage
company also got a surveyor and I believe their findings were
the same.
Mr. Orlowski: So everything that was approved, is on your
property.
Mr. Steifer: As far as the map, yes.
Mr. McDonald: I am a little concerned, confused rather. I am
looking at this, and even this shows the road moving on and off
of your property. It doesn' t even show it entirely within the
property.
Mr. Steifer: Weil, this is the road that we had to improve it
so we improved it.
Mr. McDonald: I see it showing a twenty-five foot right of way,
but it shows the travel road moving in and out of it.
Mr. Steifer: Well, this was the road we were told to improve
and we improved it, and we wouldn' t want to say that the Town
Board made us improve somebody else' s road. We've improved the
one that was there.
Mr. Orlowski: Are you sure the Town Board asked you to
improve this?
Mr. Steifer: The Planning Board, I am sorry.
Mr. McDonald: But, you see it showed a twenty-five foot
right-of-way and normally, that is an indication that that is
where you put the road.
Mr. Steifer: No, there was an additional twenty-five foot
right- of- way given in case that road was ever to expand, which
the Planning Board also asked for.
Mr. McDonald: It' s very confusing, because the road is outside
the property in several spots.
Mr. Orlowski: You see, the thing was, we made you put the
right-of-way on that side just in case something did happen, and
it appears something did happen, as far as access, you have to
prove access on that right-of-way. That is out of the
subdivision and I don' t know if that is still in court, or what
happened, but for some reason, the person in the back did not
build on that property.
Mr. Steifer: Well, from what I understand now, C.O. ' s are
available.
PLANNING BOARD 27 MARCH 11411991
Mr. McDonald: Were you in court on this?
Mr. Steifer: They didn' t go to court yet on that.
Mr. McDonald: You have to bring us up to date, who is they?
Mr. Steifer: On the far corner, I don' t even know the name,
on the westbound side.
Mr. Orlowski: Sayer?
Mr. Steifer: Not Sayer, in front of Sayer.
Mr. Orlowski: Mets?
Mr. Steifer: No Metts, no longer, Donte, Donte had
claimed that what he wanted to do was to move some LILCO poles
and that is where the whole story started. He wanted to push
them on the otherside of the road so he would have more
property on his side, and apparently it was stopped there
because of the Planning maps, and now it is in court.
Mr. McDonald: Presently, this matter is in court?
Mr. Steifer: Right now, it is now in court.
Mr. McDonald: Are you one of the people involved in the court
action?
Mr. Steifer: Yes, I am.
Mr. McDonald: What is the purpose of that court action? To
determine what?
Mr. Steifer: Well, they had claimed that my piece of property
was overlapping theirs.
Mr. McDonald: How long has this been in litigation?
Mr. Steifer: Approximately about a year.
Mr. McDonald: The lines that we're looking at on this survey
are under litigation.
Mr. Steifer: Yes, this survey and there is another one
following it.
Mr. McDonald: That kind of causes a problem there itself
because we are going to do a subdivision based on lines,
property lines, which are under litigation? You know, You can
sit there and show the map to us, and in all honesty, and I am
sure you are being honest about it. ( Stopped talking) .
Mr. Steifer: It' s got an approval on it.
PLANNING BOARD 28 MARCH 110991
Mr. McDonald: I know, but somebody else somewhere, obviously
has a map that shows something different, that is why you are in
litigation, there should be another map. Why are you in court?
Mr. Steifer: Well, that is what they are waiting to resolve
now.
Mr. McDonald: But that is my point, until that is resolved, how
do we even know where the lines are.
Mr. Arnoff: Excuse me Mark, who is your attorney handling this.
Mr. Steifer: Mr. Price.
Mr. Arnoff: Bill Price?
Mr. Steifer: Yes.
Mr. Arnoff: Maybe if you ask Bill Price to contact me, I 'm the
Town Attorney. Have Bill call me, maybe I can make some kind of
objective, legal analysis, so the Board can determine whether it
wishes to act, or not, based upon the present dispute. I offer
that as a suggestion to end this because I don' t think this
discussion is going anywhere. I think we are going around in a
circle. I seem to get that feeling.
Mr. Orlowski: Alright. Is that O.K. .
Mr. Steifer: Yes, great.
Mr. Arnoff: Have Mr. Price get in touch with me.
Mr. Orlowski: O.K. , that is what we will do then.
Mr. Steifer: Alright, thank you.
Mr. Orlowski: Any other questions? Being no further
questions or comments, I ' ll entertain a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Ward: So moved.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on
the motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards,
Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Being there was no further business to be brought before the
Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8: 45 p.m. .
PLANNING BOARD *15 JANUARY 14, 991
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald,
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
APPROVAL OF PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
Mr. Orlowski : Board to approve the November 13 , 1990,
December 3 , 1990 and December 17, 1990 minutes.
Mr. Ward: So moved.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. McDonald.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. McDonald: Mr. Chairman, I would like to propose a motion we
accept the local law in relation to Accessory Building
Setbacks. This pertains to 100-33B of the Zoning Section of the
code and its relation to the setbacks around various size lots.
This has been sent back to us for a review and I would like to
make a motion that we endorse it as it is presently written.
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. McDonald, Mr. Ward.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Being I have nothing further left on my agenda,
I see that Mr. Steifer is here and has requested some time to
talk with the Board on his subdivision.
5 Mr. Steifer: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board, I sent a map
in for a review by the Board for a subdivision which I would
like to break up into two lots which is fourteen acres. I would
like to keep one lot as agricultural which is a horse farm and
PL.ANNING BOARD *16 JANUARY 14, *91
the other lot which is a house, I would like to sell which would
abut ten acres. Now the way I have put it up there I don't know
if the Board would appreciate this type but I also got another
way which I can make a flag lot off of it and make the road come
off of Sound Avenue which I have in my hand if you would like to
do that?
Ms. Scopaz: Why don' t you bring it up to the table.
Mr. Steifer: I would like to donate as a santuary the back
lots, which I would not need. All I am interested in, is the
ten acres for the farm because of the agricultural that is why
it is broken up the way it is. All the land to the south of the
house I can donate all the way up almost to the front of the'
house to where the line is, as far as the sanctuary I have no
use for it. All, I am interested in is the house and the barn
which I have, otherwise I won' t need it.
Mr. Ward: Our problem is the fact that this has a minor
subdivision originally was the fourth lot. Taking a fifth lot
requires a road.
Mr. Steifer: So it could be considered a major. But, both
lots go UP to Sound Avenue which are both accessible. Right now
the Town and the Building Department made me put that road in to
access that house; saying not to travel on to the west side road
even though we improved that road. We put twelve thousand
dollars into it to improve it and now building permits were
issued on the back three properties off of that road.
Mr. McDonald: I 'm new, so I 'm more confused than most. You
owned this property in a larger form before and subdivided it?
Mr. Steifer: I subdivided it into four equal parts.
Mr. McDonald: And those lots were south of where your house is
now?
Mr. Steifer: Yes, south of my home.
Mr. McDonald: There was no road put in at that time for those
lots?
Mr. Steifer: There was a road and it was improved.
Mr. McDonald: Improved, how?
Mr. Steifer: We improved it. The Planning Board asked us to
improve it and we put twelve thousand dollars into it.
Mr. McDonald: Is it paved?
Mr. Steifer: It wasn' t paved. It was stone blend.
-PLANNING BOARD *17 JANUARY 14 , &l
Mr. McDonald: Now, this extra lot makes it a major subdivision.
Mr. Steifer: I understand that, but both would be leading off
Sound Avenue and right now the Building Department and the
Planning Board --.
Mr. Orlowski: Mark, this is the approved map.
Mr. McDonald: Oh, this is the old map. This was a long piece
of property wasn' t it?
Mr. Steifer: Right.
Mr. McDonald: You improved the road all the way from Sound
Avenue down to the beginning of this last lot?
Mr. . Steifer: We improved it yes.
Mr. McDonald: I am trying to think what you did for twelve
thousand dollars and that many feet.
Mr. Steifer: Which is also used by the people on the back on
the lake. They also share that road and, like I said, on the
other one I don't even travel the road because the Building
Department and the Board asked me to put in my own drive which I
did, which is on the east side of the property of my property,
now noted on the map. That is the drive which I wish to keep
for the house in the back; and the other one will have access
right on Sound Avenue, because the other building will be
probably about 200 feet off of Sound Avenue setback which will
be a small ranch. The property far in the back I will donate
it, if you want it, for a bird sanctuary or an animal sanctuary
because I won' t use it. Like I said, according to the Town
line, I need the ten acres for agricultural.
Mr. Orlowski: Those lots on the original subdivision, do they
all have building permits?
Mr. Steifer: Yes.
Mr. McDonald: Are there houses on it?
Mr. Steifer: Nope. Nobody has built on them yet, but they
all have building permits.
Mr. McDonald: They have building permits?
Mr. Steifer: In other words, a building permit is available
for them.
Mr. McDonald: They don' t actually have them?
Mr. Steifer: They are available if they were to request
them. Nobody is building on them now.
TLANNING BOARD 8 JANUARY 14, *1
Mr. Orlowski: You didn' t bring anything from the Building
Department?
Mr. Steifer: No, but I can get a letter which I did speak to
them and they said they would give me a letter confirming the
fact that there are building permits available.
Mr. Orlowski: There is no access because the right of way is
in litigation right now?
Mr. Steifer: It is in litigation but this is the second map.
you' ll see that that is a new one. That' s not the one by
Dinek. The original one is by Dinek. This one was done out
of Garden City and Ridge and they came up with the same
findings. We paved that road even though it is in litigation.
Actually, all I am looking for, like I said, is to separate the
house from the farm.
Mr. Orlowski: The last parcel of ten acres that is going to
be left?
Mr. Steifer: That' s going to be left and, like I said, I
would probably keep about five acres because I don' t know if
going to the Town, if you need, if I sell the building lots off
of it can I put up fences? That is all I am interested in.
Mr. Orlowski: It has to be a minimum of ten acres before they
will even buy it.
Mr. Steifer: Oh, it has to be. I need at least one for my
house. As far as what the Town wants, they can use it as a
animal sanctuary because there, is a lot of animal and game in
there because I have none for it other than that. I won' t use
it in the back because all my stables and corals are up front.
Mr. McDonald: What is the zone on this?
Mr. Orlowski: AC.
Mr. McDonald: This is over ten acres and if it is AC, it has to
be clustered according to the code.
Mr. Orlowski: We're not sure Mark.
Mr. McDonald: I have no idea what the zone is on it. It
doesn' t make any difference because if it's R-40 or R-80 any of
the low density residentials, it is still the same.
Mr. Stiefer: I have no idea.
Mr. McDonald: There is a section of the Code that says if it is
over a certain size and you are in a certain zone, you have to
have it clustered.
.PLANNING BOARD 9 JANUARY 14, 1
Mr. Stiefer: In other words, it all has to be in one area.
Mr. McDonald: The lots have to be down- sized and there has to
be open space provided so instead of having it all occupied by
lots you have to have the Plots where the houses are going to go
plus an area designated as open space which is in joint
ownership or in an appropriate form of ownership.
Mr. Stiefer: In other words, the way I would have it set up,
it would not comply.
Mr. McDonald: I would refer it to the Town Attorney, but I
don' t think so.
Mr. Stiefer: In other words, with the house up on the
Mr. , McDonald: It is not the location of the house, it is the
size of the lot.
Mr. Stiefer: But the lot still would be ten acres plus, even
though it' s not in the cluster.
Mr. McDonald: No, No, it says that lots that are ten acres or
more must be clustered.
Mr. Orlowski: What Mr. Stiefer is saying, that if he can
subdivide his house it would be a major subdivision and he would
covenant the rest of the property never to be subdivided in
perpetuity for as long as anybody lives.
Mr. Stiefer: That' s right, all I 'm interested in is the farm
up front.
Mr. McDonald: I guess You could take that as conservation
easement.
Mr. Orlowski: Yes.
Mr. Ward: Why does this have to be a separate lot then?
Mr. Stiefer: Because of the building of the house and this
would constitute where the pool is and would give them enough
area around the house. I want to put a small ranch on here. In
other words in front of the barn.
Mr. McDonald: I would like to take it under consideration, I've
got to think about this.
Mr. Orlowski: You know, I told you about that letter showing
us that those lots were buildable. Get that from the Building
Department and We will review it and get back to you.
Mr. Stiefer: O.K. . When would you like the letter? Next
Week?
,PLANNING BOARD 0 JANUARY 14, Jf1
Mr. Orlowski: Whenever you can get it.
Mr. Stiefer: Thank you very much.
Mr. Orlowski: I have nothing left on my agenda. Does anyone
in the audience have any questions or comments?
Mr. Edwards: I would like to entertain a motion to adjourn this
meeting.
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Aye�: Mr. Ward, Mr. Edwards, Mr. McDonald,
Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Being there was no more business to be brought before the Board
the meeting was adjourned at 8 : 10 p.m.
Jane Rousseau
Bennett Orlo kI Jr. , Ch rman
PLANNING BOARD
22 MARCH 1991
SETTING OF THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING
Mr. Orlowski: Board to set Monday April 1, 1991 at 7 : 30 p.m.
at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold as the time and
place for the next regular Planning Board meeting.
Mr. Ward: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. Latham, Mr. McDonald,
Mr. Edwards, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: I ' ll make a motion to approve the Planning
Board minutes Of February 12, 1991.
Mr. McDonald: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the
motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Latham,
Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Ward.
Mr. Orlowski : Opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Being as I have nothing left on my agenda. I
see Mr. Steiferis here, would you like to address the Board?
Joe Steifer: Mattituck. When I spoke to the Board the last
time I was here, the request was for C.O. ' s on the back
properties which, I believe, were taken care of. There were
C.O. 's available. I guess that was the raising of the question,
I believe, by You Mr. McDonald.
Mr. McDonald: No, I can guarantee you that I did not raise that
question. However, I am interested, did you supply C.O. , s to
us? Vacant land C.o. ,s?
Mr. Steifer: No, in other words I was under the impression
that you people had gotten them from the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: You can no longer get a vacant land C.O. .
Mr. Steifer: I am talking about a building C.O. and you can' t
get a building C.O. without access.
PLANNING BOARD 23 MARCH 1* 1991
Mr. McDonald: Well, that is what I am wondering, how would you
prove that you can get a C.O. until you 90 to Put up a building?
Mr. Steifer: But the C.O. ' s are all available now.
Mr. McDonald: Where are they then?
Mr. Steifer: In other words, I would have to furnish them to
the Board? That was actually the question, and all of the back
three lots do have availability for a building C.O. on it, which
means there is an access route to it. This road was improved by
US. Even though we do not use it, because according to the
Planning Board and the Building Department, we weren't to use
that road so we formed our own road on the east side of the
property which this new piece will come off of.
Mr. - McDonald: You formed a driveway?
Mr. Steifer: Yes. 800 feet and the only difference would be,
that it is the one split, with no future subdivision on it,
because that will be retained as a farm and the new house will
be built off that driveway which I have furnished the plans
for.
Mr. McDonald: What have we determined about those back lots?
What do we know?
Ms. Spiro: I have nothing from the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: So we have nothing from the Building Department.
And was a 280A ever done on it? Or was that part of the
subdivision?
Mr. Orlowski: It is part of the subdivision. The road that
he improved was out of the subdivision.
Mr. McDonald: Well, it needs a 280A. You can' t do a road
outside a subdivision without a 280A so there should be a 280A
on this somewhere right? You need an approval from the ZBA for
improvement on the road.
Mr. Steifer: That was already done.
Mr. McDonald: A 280A exists?
Mr. Steifer: It does exist, otherwise there would not be
building permits available on the back lots.
Mr. McDonald: We don' t even know that though.
Mr. Orlowski: There are no building permits, we have nothing.
Mr. Steifer: O.K. , so I would have to furnish you with the
building permits?
PLANNING BOARD 24 MARCH * 1991
Mr. Orlowski: Or the Building Department.
Mr. Steifer: I 'm sorry, I assumed that this was taken care
of. I had spoken to the Building Department and they said it
was taken care of. I will follow up on it.
Mr. McDonald: While this is certainly important, I don' t want
to mislead you, but if You supply these it doesn' t necessarily
mean, and I don' t speak for the rest of the Board, but even if
You supplied these it doesn' t necessarily mean that I would say
O.K. , go ahead and put the road on the east side of the property.
Mr. Steifer: The road is already there.
Mr. McDonald: No, there is a driveway, there is no road. There
is a driveway that services a single and separate lot. You are
talking about turning it into several lots.
Mr. Steifer: No, I am talking about only adding one lot.
Mr. McDonald: O.K. , you are going to create two lots,.?
Mr. Steifer: Yes.
Mr. McDonald: There is one and you want two?
Mr. Steifer: The front one will be off Sound Avenue.
Mr. McDonald: So a road could conceivably be necessary.
could call it a driveway but it would still be considered You
road, a
and I don' t want to mislead you simple because you supply
that. I might not necessarily, and again I am not speaking for
the rest of the Board, and I haven' t decided yet either. But,
simply supplying them doesn' t necessarily mean I am going to say
that no, there is no road needed.
Mr. Steifer: What would be the Purpose of the road?
Mr. McDonald: Well, that remains to be seen. That is one of
the reasons I am saying that I haven' t decided yet because I
have to look at the whole layout. You had a previous minor
subdivision?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: With a road with a 280A access over this rather
than actually a road, and I 've got to be honest (stopped
talking) .
Mr. Orlowski : No, the subdivision originally granted was
approved with a road on Mr. Steifer' sproperty. The map was
signed showing the road on his property, and that is all we can
address. When it was done and approved the people or the person
buying a lot, in the back, came to this Board and said "I have
I�LANNING BOARD 25 MARCH 1991
no access to my property" . The Board says, "Mr. Steifer, in
this subdivision it shows that there is a road on this property
that has to be improved by somebody" , she says, I cannot get to
my property, I am involved in litigation. I cannot get building
permits, I cannot get anything. In effect, I have bought a land
locked piece of property. We assured her that it is not because
she has access over to the property, that is suppose to have
been built but was never built on your property because you
improved the access road or right-of-way, which is not in the
subdivision. That is out of our jurisdiction completely.
Mr. Steifer: we improved the road that the Town Board
requested us to improve on the property now.
Mr. McDonald: On your property?
Mr. Steifer: It was on the map. We improved the road that
the Town Board had requested us to improve on the map. It was
part of the property on the map. and the Town Board says, you
will have to improve it, otherwise, no subdivision would be put
and there was a vast amount of money spent on this road.
Mr. McDonald: And that is the road that presently exists and
leads into Laurel Lake?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: How many lots are there in the first subdivision?
Mr. Steifer: Four, an average of twenty- eight acres.
Mr. McDonald: So an additional lot, would make you a major?
Mr. Steifer: Yes sir.
Mr. McDonald: Usually, at that point, we would insist on
improving it to the road standards.
Mr. Steifer: But, we are not allowed to travel that road.
Mr. McDonald: Why not?
Mr. Steifer: According to the Town and the Building
Department, we have no access on that road and we have to stay
off. That is why a driveway was put on each side of. the
property.
Mr. McDonald: You don' t own that property?
Mr. Steifer: Whether I own it or not, I was not permitted
access on it by the Town Board or the Building Department.
Mr. McDonald: Do you kn.ow if you own it?
PLANNING BOARD
26 MARCH 1991
Mr. Steifer: According to my map that I just furnished, yes
and this was not done byDanok, this was done by a second
surveyor. As a matter of fact, I believe that the mortgage
company also got a surveyor and I believe their findings were
the same.
Mr. Orlowski: So everything that was approved, is on your
property.
Mr. Steifer: As far as the map, yes.
Mr. McDonald: I am a little concerned, confused rather. I am
looking at this, and even this shows the road moving on and off
of your property. It doesn' t even show it entirely within the
property.
Mr. , Steifer: Well, this is the road that we had to improve it
so we improved it.
Mr. McDonald: I see it showing a twenty-five foot right of way,
but it shows the travel road moving in and out of it.
Mr. Steifer: Well, this was the road we were told to improve
and we improved it, and we wouldn' t want to say that the Town
Board made us improve somebody else' s road. We 've improved the
one that was there.
Mr. Orlowski: Are you sure the Town Board asked you to
improve this?
Mr. Steifer: The Planning Board, I am sorry.
Mr. McDonald: But, You see it showed a twenty-five foot
right-of-way and normally, that is an indication that that is
where You Put the road.
Mr. Steifer: No, there was an additional twenty-five foot
right- of- way given in case that road was ever to expand, which
the Planning Board also asked for.
Mr. McDonald: It' s very confusing, because the road is outside
the property in several spots.
Mr. Orlowski: You see, the thing was, we made you put the
right-of-way on that side just in case something did happen, and
it appears some-thing did happen, as far as access, you have to
prove access on that right-of-way. That is out of the
subdivision and I don' t know if that is still in court, or what
happened, but for some reason, the person in the back did not
build on that property.
Mr. Steifer: Well, from what I understand now, C.O. ' s are
available.
PLANNING BOARD 27 MARCH 1991
Mr. McDonald: Were you in court on this?
Mr. Steifer: They didn' t go to court yet on that.
Mr. McDonald: You have to bring us up to date, who is they?
Mr. Steifer: On the far corner, I don' t even know the name,
on the westbound side.
Mr. Orlowski: Sayer?
Mr. Steifer: Not Sayer, in front of Sayer.
Mr. Orlowski: Mets?
Mr. Steifer: No Metts, no longer, Dcnte, Donte had
claimed that what he wanted to do was to move some LILCO poles
and that is where the whole story started. He wanted to push
them on the otherside of the road so he would have more
property on his side, and apparently it was stopped there
because of the Planning maps, and now it is in court.
Mr. McDonald: Presently, this matter is in court?
Mr. Steifer: Right now, it is now in court.
Mr. McDonald: Are you one of the people involved in the court
action?
Mr. Steifer: Yes, I am.
Mr. McDonald: What is the purpose of that court action? To
determine what?
Mr. Steifer: Well, they had claimed that my piece of property
was overlapping theirs.
Mr. McDonald: How long has this been in litigation?
Mr. Steifer: Approximately about a year.
Mr. McDonald: The lines that we' re looking at on this survey
are under litigation.
Mr. Steifer: Yes, this survey and there is another one
following it.
Mr. McDonald: That kind of causes a problem there itself
because we are going to do a subdivision based an lines,
property lines, which are under litigation? You know, you can
sit there and show the map to us, and in all honesty, and I am
sure you are being honest about it. (Stopped talking) .
Mr. Steifer: It' s got an approval on it.
PLANNING BOARD 28 MARCH 1991
Mr. McDonald: I know, but somebody else somewhere, obviously
has a map that shows something different, that is why you are in
litigation, there should be another map. Why are you in court?
Mr. Steifer: Well, that is what they are waiting to resolve
now.
Mr. McDonald: But that is my point, until that is resolved, how
do we even know where the lines are.
Mr. Arnoff: Excuse me Mark, who is your attorney handling this.
Mr. Steifer: Mr. Price.
Mr. Arnoff: Bill Price?
Mr. ,Steifer: Yes.
Mr. Arnoff: Maybe if you ask Bill Price to contact me, I 'm the
Town Attorney. Have Bill call me, maybe I can make some kind of
objective, legal analysis, so the Board can determine whether it
wishes to act, or not, based upon the present dispute. I offer
that as a suggestion to end this because I don' t think this
discussion is going anywhere. I think we are going around in a
circle. I seem to get that feeling.
Mr. Orlowski: Alright. Is that O.K. .
Mr. Steifer: Yes, great.
Mr. Arnoff: Have Mr. Price get in touch with me.
Mr. Orlowski: O.K. , that is what we will do then.
Mr. Steifer: Alright, thank you.
Mr. Orlowski: Any other questions? Being no further
questions or comments, I ' ll entertain a motion to adjourn.
Mr. Ward: So moved.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on
the motion? All those in favor?
Ayes: Mr. Ward, Mr. McDonald, Mr. Edwards,
Mr. Latham, Mr. Orlowski.
Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered.
Being there was no further business to be brought before the
Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8: 45 p.m. .
Town Hall. 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold. New York 119 71
TELEPHONE
(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 27 , 1989
Kevin McLaughlin
828 Front Street
P.O. Box 803
Greenport, New York 11944
RE: Proposal for Joseph Steifer
to Re-subdivide Lot #1
SCTM#1000-121-4-8
Dear Mr. McLaughlin:
The Planning Board reviewed the request to re-subdivide the
above mentioned property.
The Board requests that the right-of-way be located on the
west side of the parcel.
Please note that as stated in the Declaration of Covenants
and Restrictions, any further subdivision of Lot #1 will be
considered a major subdivision.
Very trul your
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
CHAIRMAN
ms
F
lo�
/ -4740!'
I Z
'11 "' 1,12
SIP
S. Z1049'ZO
Ile
ES
t 4r
lit
c 0
0
13. 3 655 A C 5
C) A?C -5
. 365
1� _\ A
POLE O'd
Ole M.Z'E ?27.3
Uri POLE AF LED PlIrr ROAD
pake Af vOO53 150
496--97 1
PLUX
ALSIff. ow.
3 08 1 j-4 0/�V
GdV08 DNINNVId
NMOI alo"Inos
sew
P ;
NIF
Z/050'00
SA YRF
7Z50,
2/17/89
y0ilivel- STeifer to Kujawski
Enclosed is sketch for subdivision at Sundown Farms by Joseph
Steifer. The proposal calls for all lotk to use the existing
improved right of way. Please schedule this for a work
session as soon as possible and advise me of the date thereof.
F—southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
R 11 ,�------ Kevin McLaughlin
To Main Road
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Southold, NY 11971 828 FRONT STREET, P. 0. BOX 803
Attn: Melissa
L GREENPORT, NY 11944
(516)477-1016
...im
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516)765-1938
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Kevin McLauglin
P.O. Box 803
Greenport, NY 11944
RE: Joseph Stiefer
Sundown Farms
SCTM #1000-121-4-8
Dear Mr. McLauglin:
The Planning Board reviewed your letter September 29, 1988.
The Board is not in favor of granting a subdivision using
two ( 2) access point off Sound Avenue. When the original
subdivision of four ( 4) lots was approved it was done so with
the intent that any future subdivision would be processed as a
major subdivision. The Planning Board will proceed with an
application designed so as to have one access off Sound Avenue
with all lots having access off this proposed road.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
y- ruly yours,
21
el---� I I
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.
CHAIRMAN
j t
ATTORNEY AT LAW�
828 FRONT STREET, P 0.BOX 803
GREENPORT,NY 11944
(516)477-1016 SEP 3 o 19%
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
September 29, 198R5830
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Joseph Stiefer - Sundown Farms
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that I represent Joseph Stiefer regarding
the proposed subdivision of his 13. 3655 acre lot along Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York. This lot presently provides two access points
onto Sound Avenue. One is located along the westerly boundary of
the parcel and the other is located on the easterly side of the
parcel.
Mr. Stiefer desires to subdivide this 13. 3655 acre parcel
into four (4) lots, retaining the presently existing two access
points . This will result in no increase in the number of access
points onto Sound Avenue. The presently existing access along Mr.
Stiefer ' s westerly boundary also serves as the access to the parcels
further to the south.
Please review your position on this matter and advise me
in writing as soon as possible.
Very t 1 s
rul
J j
in McLau- hl '
JKM/lmt
/lanning Board Page 9 May 9 , 1988
cconform with this price list that will be updated every year. It
sshou�d make the bonding procedure a little easier.
0
hn f
oul
Mr. ward: I don't know if we have to have the Board adopt it. I
think as long as we adopted it and gave it to the subdivider with a
note r for him to have his engineer prepare for our review, a bond
estinate. utilizing these prices which we approve as a Board. I think
it wculd simplify and cut down some of the time that our consulting
g t
agent, here presently, is spending on bond estimates.
Mr. Mullen: I think we should also advise them at this time that
this will be good until such and such a date.
Mr. Ward: Yes, this will be adopted for 1988. 1 make a motion that we
as a ?lanning Board accept these unit prices to be utilized for bond
estimates and that a letter be attached to our subdivision
regulations when we give it out to a developer. So in turn they
under;;tand that they would produce the bond estimate for our review.
Mr. Mullen: Second.
Mr. Orlowski: Motion made and seconded. Any questions on the motion?
All those in favor?
Vote of the Board;Ayes: Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward.
Mr. Orlowski: opposed? So ordered.
Mr. Orlowski: Next we have Sundown Farms- Board to discuss this
with the applicant. SCTM #1000-121-4-8. Mr. Stiefer is here.
Joe Stiefer: I would like to put a subdivision. I had a minor before
we had a fourteen acre parcel. We want to put three two acre parcels
along Sound Avenue and leave a seven and three quarter parcel to
remain.
Mr. Orlowski: Do you want to come up and show the Board how you want
to do that?
Mr. StLefer: This is the parcel that is in question now: one, two,
three and this will remain as one.
Mr. Ward: When this subdivision originally came in, the presentation
to us was that any further subdivision that came in would be a major
and road would be improved.
Mr. Sti.efer: Which road would be improved? only if the road was used.
The road will not be used. These all border Sound Avenue.
Mr. Orlowski: How does lots two and three get access right now.
Mr. Stiefer: There is a right-of-way all the way down.
/anning Board Page 10 May 9 , 1988
r. OrLowski: How come they can't get a building permit down there.
M Mr. St ,,efer: This road is under question because of two different
r
r
0
Sa
r
t 'L n
0
en
w
f
surveys. We have to discuss with the Town Board. We Put eleven
thousand dollars into this road that was requested to approve the
road. I We have not gotten the right-of-way on it yet. That is an issue
_ J
that i�; up in the air.
Mr. Ward: Just generally speaking we would not be in favor of that
layout.
Mr. St 1_ ft
Mr. Stiefer: Why?
Mr. Ward: That Particular section of Sound View is a disaster down
there.
Mr. Stiefer: This area is fine. over here is the disaster. This is a
flat area.
Mr. Ward: The whole strip in here is bad. Adding more driveways onto
Sound Avenue isn't the answer. You could be coming up in here and
develop here.
Mr. Stiefer: How many more driveways would be added on? Would the
Board be happy with one additional driveway? We have to have some
type of driveway to get on and off the land. What you are doing is
locking in the land.
Mr. Ward: Develop the right-of-way back in like it should be and then
develops the property. That is the way this whole thing is set up to
begin with.
Mr. Stiefer: No. This was never set up. This one was subdivided back
here. This one was left open.
Mr. Ward: Any future lots would be. . . .
Mr. StieEer: This one would be four. one, Two, Three, Four. We are
not changing the subdivision.
Mr. Ward: Well, I don't know if this Board would approve going off of
Sound View.
Mr. Stiefer: Why. Is there some type Of a code?
Mr. Ward: It is a traffic problem.
Mr. Stiefer: I don't understand traffic problem. They have where they
are opening up a subdivision across the way which is going right
across onto the same area. You have one that was just open over here.
Mr. Ward: On a road.
/anning Bole Page MaY 9, 1988
Mr. Sttefer: It is still coming onto Sound Avenue. All am asking is
for one more driveway onto Sound Avenue.
Mr. Ward: Where are the others going to go?
M
fr
0
Mr
r
S
0 t
na
r
W a L e
rd
2
Mr. Stie,fer: This one. I have my own right-of-way on here. This one
has a right-of-way on it already. All we are talking about is one
1,
more driveway on Sound Avenue.
v
Mr. Orlowski: Can they use that right-of-way?
I
Mr. Stiefer: There is a right-of-way on the land.
Mr. Orlowski: Can he use it? You already got two lots in there that
they can't even get a building permit on.
Mr. Stiefer: But there is still a right-of-way is there. All they
have to do is trench it.
Mr. Mullen: We don't see any right-of-way on the map here.
Mr. Stiefer: We gave a right-of
-way. Yes this one. I own the land and
I will make sure there is a right-of-way available there. This is a
right-of-way already. This one here, I own the land. I will make a
right-of-way. You have only one access on the Sound Avenue, which is
not a terrific problem. This is a flat area. Down here is where loopy.
Mr. Latham: What are going to do down here. Some day you are going to
have to make a road here going to there, aren't you?
Mr. Stiefer: No. The Town made me make a road off here to run to my
home which is back here. I have right-of-way on this side and a
right-of-way on this side.
Mr. Latham: Well, it didn't show anything on the map.
Mr. Stiefer: No. It wouldn't show on the map. .There is a right-of-way
here and a right-of-way here. This would be the only one that has
access to Sound Avenue. This one has a right-of-way and this one has
a right-of-way.
Mr. Mullen: I think we should see another right-of-way here.
Mr. Ward: We can take a look at it again.
Mr. Stiefer: If it is that bad than I suggest that the Town put some
type of object up here for this right-of-way and this right-of-way.
If the road is as bad as You say it is.
Mr. Ward: Our subdivision policy along Sound Avenue has been to allow
tap streets to come in. Not lots spacing.
Mr. Stiefer: We have one more lot.
/nning Board Page 12 may 9 , 1988
r. OrLowski: You tell me that vou have right-of-way coming into your
Pproperty or a buffer?
MrMr. St�.efer: No, right-of-ways. They are deeded in the deeds. On both
sides. For access back here.
r
r-1-P
0 0
e
S
s
r
rL
tn
0
Y
ew
f
s de F
I. - 0
Mr. Mullen: They go all the way through.
r
Mr. Stiefer: Twenty five foot right-of-ways. You people made me put a
right-of-way all the way to the end.
Mr. Mullen: Lets take a look at it.
Mr. Stiefer: We got a right-of-way here and this right-of-way,I own
the property.
Mr. Latham: Who is contesting this right-of-way? Not the Town?
Mr. Stiefer: Not the Town. They are not really contesting the
right-of-way, they are contesting the road. They are trying to use
the road as a right-of-way, but meanwhile the right-of-way is there.
It is available.
Mr. Orlowski: So what You told the people purchased the lots, if you
want it, You got to put the right-of-way there.
Mr. Stiefer: That is right. I gave them the right-of-way.
Mr. Mullen: How large are these lots up here?
Mr. Stiefer: They are two acres apiece.
Mr. Mullen: Let us take a look at it.
Mr. Stiefer: I would appreciate it.
Mr. Orlowski: You realize the covenants on the first subdivision is
that this would be considered a major subdivision.
Mr. Stiefer: As far as what. What would be the restrictions?
Mr. Orlowski: All criteria's of a major subdivision would be met in
this one.
Mr. Stiefer: Like?
Mr. Orlowski: I don't want to read them ail to you now, but You can
come in and find out. Let us take a look at the lot.
Mr. Stiefer: O.K. Thank you.
P D
T LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
August 31, 1987
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, New York 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
access road
Dear Mrs. Kujawski:
Enclosed is a copy of correspondence received from Sidney
Bowne & Son with regard to the above mentioned subdivision
access road.
The Planning Board requests compliance with their
recommendation, and asks that you advise our office upon
completion of the work.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
0 0
SIDNEY S. BOWNE & SON
Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. Roland Anders
(1922-1959) W-WA-19-(fly-wel Frank Capobianco
Chester C Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. Roger L,Cocchi
Alexandre W.Mercil, P.E. 45 Manor Road Francis J,Lynch
Robert A.Stanton, P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 1 Philip Schlotzhouer
Robert W. Brown,L.S. (516) 724-0611 p Joseph F Stagri
Zalothel A. Blackman, P.E., L.S. BY Paul F Stevens
�J; William T Styne
George A.Style, P.E. Richard 6 Weber
Jerry D.Almond, P.E.
George L. Fagan,Jr., Ph.D.,P.E.
Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S August 25, 1987
Mr. Bennet Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Planning Board
53095 Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Final Inspection, Sundown Farms/Joseph Steifer, Mattituck-Laurel ,
Town of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87156)
Gentlemen:
A final site inspection pertaining to the access road construction
only, per Mr. V. Lessard, was conducted on August 20, 1987. Present
wee Mr. Raymond Dean and Mr. C.S. Heffernan, both from this office.
We find that material was imported to fill the potholes through the
first 250+' off Sound Avenue. This material was poorly graded (sand)
and as a result did not compact to form a stable riding surface (see
J.W. Davis report dated 10/19/84) . We recommend that this section be
reconstructed to attain an acceptable riding surface. The remainder of
the access road (1750+) is acceptable at this time.
Very truly yours,
SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON
7 CONS LTING ENGIN�ERcpl
l:: ::::!a :�� :1�'
14,
CSH:clg CDR NE L I us FFFRPANf
xc: Ray Jacobs, Supt./Hwys.
Ray Dean (SBB)
V. Lessard (Building Dept.)
MINEOLA a SMITHTOWN is NEWYORKCITY * CLEARWATER
An Equal Opportunity Empli lili
P /'N D
TO LD
S , y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938 co , 19 61
Robert Brown
Sidney and Bowne and Son
Hauppague, NY 11787
Dear Mr. Brown:
Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold
Town Planning Board hereby refers the following:
A lication of (Major subdivision, inor sub( site plan)
LLrda 7-,, :Fcvrnz - ZT(pne-pK -
;"�i;Vi a Eio
Hamlet
MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File #
Suffolk County Tax Map No. k000 -
Sketch plan
Preliminary map
Street Profiles
Grading Plan
Preliminary site plan
Final Map X
Other rC)0,CJ Pin :rrC:)M �TQhn
Comments: Yoow� )Qn�' beo-n (Ina
Jt-n y),--,pEC=h E2)�) re pc:py-t lco-e rcauc-4--
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
P D
T LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
May 29, 1986
Mr. Robert W. Tasker
Town Attorney
425 Main Street
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: "Sundown Farms"
Dear Mr. Tasker:
Enclosed for your review is a copy Of correspondence
received from Mr. Shepard Scheinberg, esq. with regard to
the traveled road and the above mentioned subdivision.
Also, enclosed are copies of the surveys for this
property - one map, surveyed by Donack, indicates a four-
lot subdivision and the other map by Van Tuyl does not.
As you can see there is a discrepancy between the two
surveys and the difference of approximately 151 means
that the traveled road is either within the subdivision
or not in the subdivision at all.
With regard to 280-a approval, the Planning Board
will not grant any approval until the discrepancy of the
traveled road is clarified, since the subdivision lot
owners would use this traveled road as access if they
have a right to.
Would you please advise our Board as to how to
proceed with this matter.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please
contact our office if you require any additional' information
or if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
afL� ocvX4,Lj �roL)ot�
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
DMS
PNC .
P D
T D
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
June 10, 1986
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
PO Box 1113
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mrs. Kujawski:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, June 9, 1986 .
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept
Inspector John W. Davis ' memorandum dated May 14, 1986 with
regard to the location of common north-south property line
(Sundown Farms - West side) and the Dantes and Sayre property
(East side) , Sound Avenue, Laurel.
Enclosed is a copy of that report for your review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions .
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUTHOLD
TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
_�j
Memorandum to: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Date: May 14, 1986
Southold Town Planning Board
From: John W. Davis
Re: Sundown Farms at Mattituck - Location of common north-south
property line (Sundown Farms-west side) and the Dantes and
Sayre property (East side)
Comments:
This section of the above property line survey was re-established today by
Donack as requested by Mrs. B. Kujawski. The Donack plans dated 9/12/84
were used.
Today's survey was also witnessed by B. Kujawski, J. Stiefer and Mr. & Mrs. Sayre.
Mrs. Sayre has a property survey by Van Tuyl dated 2/26/85 that shows the
traveled way all within that property and the 20 ft. R.O.W. . The Donack survey
is considerably different as to the location of the common property line in this
area.
R. Van Tuyl, as requested by B. Kujawski, came on the site in the P.M. after the
Donack survey party had left. He brought a survey map dated 5/25/50 (Map of
farm owned by Mary E. Hallock) which covers the same area now known as Sundown
Farms. This map shows the north side of the property along Sound Avenue (named
North Road previously) at 505.53 L.F. instead of 520.32 ft. as shown by Donack,
a difference of almost 15 ft. This lesser length accounts for some of the
differences in the property lines (East side) at the Dantes and Sayre property
as shown on the Van Tuyl and Donack maps.
The correct length of the north side (along Sound Avenue) for Sundown Farms
should be determined. The lesser length, 505.53 ft. ) , would affect the total
length of Sundown Farms (west side) for location, total acreage, etc.
May 15, 1986
R. Van Tuyl gave me a copy of the 1950 Hallock Farm map. Comparision of the
two maps (Donack and Van Tuyl) show the difference in bearing and length at the
north side, a small difference in bearing and length in the last course (south
end) of the east side and a difference in length of 16.94 ft. at the southwest
corner at the south end of the property. Donack shows 90.96 ft. , Van Tuyl
74.02 ft. This compares more or less with the difference in length of the two
surveys at the north end. All other dimensions and bearings are the same.
I reviewed the deeds from the Planning Board files, one for the Sundown Farms
and one for Lot No. 3. They both conform to the Donack survey throughout.
I
Note: The length of 520.30 ft. (Donack) for the subdivision length along
Sound Avenue has been circled in the subdivision deed. Others may have found
the discrepancy in the two surveys for that distance.
I would recommend that nothing be done as to updating the access to Sundown Farms
until the status of the common property line has been resolved.
C��Og
John W. Davis
F ULI(
D
T LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
November 8, 1984
Rudolph Bruer
Attorney at Law
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: Minor subdivision of Sundown Farms
located at Mattituck
Dear Mr Bruer:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, Monday, November 5 , 1984 .
RESOLVED that whereas , a formal application for the approval of
a subdivision plat entitled "Sundown Farms" located at Mattituck
was submitted to the Planning Board on June 12, 1984 and filing
fee of $100 was paid on October 5, 1984 , and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said subdivision application
and plat at the Town Hall, Southold, New York, on October 22, 1984
at 7 :45 p.m. , and
WHEREAS, the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the
Town of Southold have been met by said subdivision plat and
application,
NOW, therefore, be it resolved that the application of Joseph
and Patticia Steifer to be known as "Sundown Farms" for approval
of said subdivision plat prepared by Donack Associates dated
May 4 , 1984 and amended Sept. 12 , 1984 , October 2 , 1984 and Octo ber
9, 1984 , be approved and the chairman be authorized to endorse
approval on said subdivision plat subject to the following conditions:
1 . Filing of the covenants and restrictions as approved by
the Town attorney with the County Clerk.
2 . Review by the Suffolk County Planning Commission of the
subdivision plat.
Mr. Rudolph 1 ier Page 2 .4ovember 8, 1984
--------------------------------------------------------------------
When the Chairman is in receipt of notice that the above
conditions have been met, the Chairman will endorse the maps .
If you have any questions , please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours ,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOAkD
By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary
1984
OFFIC ORNEY
ROBERT W.TASKER D TELEPHONE
To� Attorney (516) 477-1400
425 MAIN ST.
GREENPORT, L.I., NEW YORK 11944
November 1, 1984
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Covenants & Restrictions - Sundown Farms
Dear Bennie:
I have reviewed the revised Declaration of Covenant and Restrictions relative
to the above subdivision which were sent to me by Mr. Bruer, the attorney
for the subdividers, and the same is acceptable as to form.
I would advise that before the agreement is executed and recorded, the
Planning Board make certain that the persons who execute the same are, at
that time, owners of the premises.
Yours very truly,
.�O�
ROBERT W. TASKER
RWT :aa
cc: Rudolph H. Bruer, Esq.
llr4l
-7e
sealand
41 8 1 psi F surveying &
e
n
July 1, 1986 JUL 3 1986 9
n
e
Mr . Bennetl Orlowski, Jr.
Southold Town Planning Dept. e
Southold Town Hall r
main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms n
9
Dear Mr, Orlowski:
Per your request I please find a listing of P
all the deeds we used to compile the tie distance
along Sound Avenue, Laurel to Aldrich Lane. Copies C
attached for your perusal .
As you can see by simple addition, if Mr .
Van Tyle' s distance is accurate it would place the
Dantes property in the middle of Sundown Farms . A
p hys al tie distance can not be established without
Ic This is
actuall surveying each parcel individually,
y are hundreds
a timely and costly procedure as there
of acres involved.
Should you have any questions or need additional
information, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly Yours
Raymond W. Donack, Sr , PLS
RWD: cw
cc : William Price
Joseph & Patricia Stiefer
Barbara Kujawski
-1717
forty west main street * riverhead, n.y. 11901 (516) 369
Tax Map No. Liber & Page Distance
1000-120-03-07 L 5653 Pg. 276 95 . 801
104. 20 '
-08 L 3001 Pg. 150-152 200 . 00 ' *
730. 00 ' *
1000-121-03-01 750. 00 ' *
-02 L 6329 Pg, 265 169 . 22 '
129 . 66 '
-03 L 3694 Pg. 568 127 . 001
46. 00 '
-04 L 3636 Pg. 541 180. 00 ,
-05 L 6634 Pg. 552 413 . 48 '
306. 201
121. 20 '
-06 L 9933 Pg. 430 157 . 00 '
-07 L 9557 Pg, 262 100. 001
-04-01 L 5143 Pg. 227 120 . 001
-02 L 2969 Pg, 52 108 . 9 1
-03 L 4809 Pg. 474 100 . 001
-04 L 4216 Pg. 559 180. 00f
-05 L 9815 Pg. 343 133 . 951
-09 L 7962 Pg, 282 22 . 4 '
0. 15 '
100 . 35 '
203 . 36 '
58 . 24 '
109 . 361
53 . 08 '
-27 L 7392 Pg, 582 10 . 15 '
Total Distance per above 4835. 2
Van Tyle Survey tie distance 4986, 95 ' to Sundown Farms
The noted distance are per Suffolk County Tax I-lap Systems
as the deeds were either not available or do not show
courses and distances .
P D
T D
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
June 10 , 1986
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
PO Box 1113
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mrs. Kujawski:
The following action was taken by theSouthold Town Planning
Board, Monday, June 9 , 1986.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board accept
Inspector John W. Davis ' memorandum dated May 14, 1986 with
regard to the location of common north-south property line
(Sundown Farms - West side) and the Dantes and Sayre property
(East side) , Sound Avenue, Laurel.
Enclosed is a copy of that report for your review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
&fw_s_ti� 0 r6ow� 4, � (_na,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAq=N SOUTHOLD
TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
St..dard N.Y.R.T.U.F.nu 8007- 2,-4 �m —11.�91" 8.1.D.,d. itir C.�'�...t ug.i..t 0...toe.WAd..�
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGMIMO THIS INSTRUMENT—THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD 09 US40 BY LAWYERS ONLY-
60
15
TH5 MDENTURE, made the day of dauenil eb- , nineteen hundred and eighty four
BETWFEN V. AVIS REEVE and RIGM6 N. REEYE,� JANET DOUGHTY and J. DONALD DOUGHTY,
BETTY EBaIfU_andFRANK_EBETINO, c/o Scheinberj-,—DePetris & �, ruzans�yy,'Fsqs ,
220 Ro noke Xvenue—, RiveTe=, New York,
3 1
party of the first part, and JOSEPH STIEFER. and PATRICIA STIEFER, his wife, residing at
no w uj,?s f c�,%4 rzo, CLI+CLO�t 4t 11"JeW
DISTRICT SECTION BLOCK LOT
=0
a 12 17 21 2 JJ
party of the second part,
WMESSL"117H, that the party of the first in consideration of hL�10=1 THI= FIVE THOUSAND
.md 00/100 - - - - - - - - - - M1�5,000.00) 7 - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - dollars,
lawful money of the United States, paid
by the party of the second part, does hereby gran and release unto the party of the second Part, the heirs or
successors and assigns of the party of the second art forever, i
IP
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, wi th the buildig gs and improvements thereon I c I rected, situate,
�I ing and being at Mattituck , in the Tom of Southold, County of Suffolk and
tate of New York, being wre partic ularly bom! ded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of 'Sound Avenue where saw is inter-
sected by the northeasterly corner of land now or fornerly of Mpt��s, Inc.
THENCE North 77' 34' 38" East along the southerly side of Sound Avenue 520.32
feet to land now or fonwrly of Wirtz;
v_i* 'T THENCE South 210 49' 120" East along last nenti,oned land and along land now or
formerly of O'Connell, ,1,984.85 feet,,.
7 THENCE South 21' 49' 40" East along last mentioned land 603.59 feet- I
I AX 1,1AP
�IGN.,'ATION THENCE still along land now or form. rly of O'Comell the following �ive (5)
courses and distances:
(1) North 890 41' 00" Weqt 110.86 feet;
100 (2) South 860 56' 00" West 230.31 feet;
(3) South 48* 15' 50" West 190.75 feet;
.1.00 (4) South 81* 23' 10" West 126.72 feet;
(5) South 48' 52' 50" West 90..96 feet to land now or fornerly of Macari;
00
(5): UPCE North 01- 15' 00" East along last nentioned land 700.01 feet,
)8.000 .1 1 1
THENCE North 230 00' 00" West along last nentioned land 115.50 feet',
THENCE North 200 53' 50" West along last nentioned land -740.80 feet�? 1
THENCE North 24* 01' 50" West along last mentioned land ,496%97 feet� 1
ITHENCE North 260 57' 20" West along land now or fornnrly �of Sayre 32 .08 feet;
THENCE North 43' 08' 50" West along land now or formrly of Sayxe' l�l.15 feet;
THENCE North 21* 30' 00" West along land now or fornerly of Mets Hones, Inc.
172.50 feet to the southerly side of Sound Avenue at the point or place of
BEGINNING.
JUHETTE P,. K1�611!_A
RECORDED NUV 21 15kA Clerk of S!Jte,:�,
5w.d,W N.V.15J,L. f...n� �0171(,M B-W'1� I'd Sld� 'd?l .......
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE*NO THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT OLD 84 USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
LIBER9737 PcE2 4:5
/"16
THIS IDMENTURE,made the 11th dayof January nineteen hundred and eighty-five
iETWEFN
JOSEPH STIEFER and PATRICIA STIEFER, his wife, both residii
at (No #) West Creek Road, Cutchogue, New York
�439`&
OWMCT SECT104 BLOCK LOT
EB ia, n7ffl 0
�17 21
p"ofthefirstparfand BARBARA KUJAWSKI, residing at (No #) Sound Avenue,
Mattituck, New York
0
24394
RFAA.
FEB 2 0 1985
T
,r
party of the second part, TRANI�,"* :
cl lcf:.n,
S6FF01_K
WITNESSE711,that the party of the first part,in consideration of 16- COUNTY
TEN ($10. 00) ------------------------------------------------ dollars,
lawful money of the United States,
paid
by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs or
successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lying and bein&hp" at Mattituck, in' the 'Town of Southold, . County of Suf
State o t ew ,York, being more particularly bounded and described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point distant the following two (2) courses and
distances from the intersection of the southerly side of Sound Aven
sm and the northeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Mets Homes,
gL�Ocj Inc . ;
(1) North 77 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds East along the
southerly side of Sound Avenue, 520. 32 feet to land now or formerly
qgz�cl of Wirtz;
(A) " (2) South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East along last
mentioned land and along land now or formerly of O'Connell, 1, 756 . 8
feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
RUNNING THENCE South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East alo
last mentioned land, 228 . 01 feet;
THENCE South 21 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East 322. 31 feet
THENCE South 88 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds West 557 . 33 feet
to lands now or formerly of Macari;
THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East along last
mentioned land 211 . 00 feeti
THENCE North -23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along last
mentioned lankil 6 feet,-
_�- Sjb lqz t
THENCE North 68 degrees 45 minutes 50 seconds East, 426 . 37 fee
to the true point or place of BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH an easement over a twenty-five foot Right of Way
for the purpose of ingress and egress from the above described prem
to and from Sound Avenue, a public highway.
The westerly line of said twenty�-five; foot, right of way is
described as follows :
RECORDEI) FEB Ao 1984 Cle,k of SujL,,j
I[ -
L1869737 PAu 246
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue
where it is intersected by the easterly line of land now or formerl
of Mets Homes Inc. , said point being distant 520. 32 feet, South 77
degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds West from the point where the westerl
line of land now or formerly of Wirtz intersects the southerly line
of Sound Avenue, aforesaid, and from said point of beginning runnin
thence in a southwesterly direction along the easterly line of land
now or formerly Of Mets Homes Inc. , aforesaid, of Sayre and Macari,
the following courses and distances :
(1) South 21 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East 172. 50 feet;
(2) South 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds East 141. 15 feet;
(3) South 26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds East 324 . 08 feet;
(4) South 24 degrees 01 minutes So seconds East 496. 97 feet;
(5) South 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East 714. 17 feet to
the northerly line of the premises hereinbefore described.
SUBJECT TO the rights of others over a twenty-five foot right <
way along the westerly line of the premises hereby conveyed and
subject to the rights of others, if any, over the traveled dirt roa(
located on the westerly portion of the said premises.
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE part of the premises conveyed to the
party of the first part by deed dated 11/8/84 and recorded in the
Suffolk County Clerk 's Office on 11J21/84 in Liber 9682 cp 15.
RECORDED FEB .20 1984 Clerk
!I Ot StItIL.",
Stand.rd N.Y. B.T.U.ro.8005 B 12-70 6%1—Ad.i.i,t,.ta,', ;ingle sb"t)
oD CONSULT TO YER BE%V' Sl�&7�G THIS INST&UMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT S*
1 9 USED BY LAWYERS ONLY.
t ALE lot of S p r
Tkill 0 UM&
made th h d"ay e tembe Rninleteenhundred and eighty-four
BETWEEN HAZEL D. BELZI. residing at 10 Moonedge Road, Northport,
New York 1768
04131ft SECTION BLOCK LOT 6591
E= EQ mo
a 12
as administrator(trix) of the Estate of Walter H. Belz, 21 26
lateof Suffolk County
who died intestate on the 20th day Of April nineteen hundred and seventy-si
party of the first part, and WALTER GATZ and MARILYN GATZ, his wife, both
residing at (no number) Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York 11952, .
party of the second part,
VaMESSETH, that whereas letters of administration were issued to the party of the first part
'Q_ by the Surrogate's Court j Suffolk County, New York on 5/24/76 and by virtue
of the power and authority given by Article 11 of the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law, and in consideration of
ICA FORTY-FIVE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE and 00/100-------------
----------------------------7----------------------------------dollars.;
paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and'
release unto the party of the second part, the distributees or successors and assigns of the party of the second
DIST. rt forever,'
that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
yingandbeingia4he at Laurel, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and Stat
1000 f New York, bounded and described as follows:
f
t
ng
_7' EGINNING at a point on the southerly side of a twenty-f ive foot Right
SEC
-- :�.� ay known as Laurel Way at the northwesterly end of the curve connect
121. 00 ng said southerly side of Laurel Way with the westerly side of a
j I
ight of Way known as Lake Wayr said point being distant the followin
.1
ourses and distances from the point on the southerly side of Sound
venue where it is intersected by the westerly line of land now or
�o Ir
BLOCK formerly of Janet Doughty, said point being distant 20 feet easterly
from land now or formerly of Joseph Macarit as measured along said
04. 00 southerly side of Sound Avenue, along the easterly and southeasterly
line of a 20 foot wide Right of Way and a twenty-five foot Right of
Way (Laurel Way) :
LOT 1) South 21 degrees 30 minutes East, 172.50 feet;
2) South 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds East, 141 . 15 feet;
26. 000 3) South-26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds East, 324.08 feet;
4) South 24 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds East, 496 . 97 feet;
5) South 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds East, 740. 80 feet;
6) South 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, 115.50 feet;
(Continued on attached rider)
TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to,any streets and
roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances,
and also all the estate which the said decedent had at the time of decedent's death in said premises, and also
the estate therein, which the party of the first part has or has power to convey or dispose of, whether individ-
ually, or otherwise; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second
part, the distributees or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything
whereby the said premises have been incumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
Subject to the trust fund provisions of section thirteen of the Lien Law.
The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "Parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the day and year first above
written.
IN P CIS OF
rIVED
'RECEI
REAL F!�'
"W SEP 2 0 1984 Ulazel17�z)
11JRANSFr.r,! TA.�
-V SUFFOLK
C
Ou" RECOROFn SEP .o
9645 PACE 67
RIDER TO DEED
FROM HAZEL D. BELZ, as Administratrix of the Estate of Walter H. Belz
TO WALTER GATZ and MARILYN GATZ, his wife
DATED: September 10, 1984
7) South 01 degrees 15 minutes West, 30.00 feet;
8) South 30 degrees 08 minutes 10 seconds West, 366.22 feet;
9) Along an arc of a circle bearing to the right, having a radius of
141.25 feet, a distance of 77. 96 feet to the true point of beginning;
RUNNING THENCE in a southeasterly direction along an arc of a circle
having a radius of 8.54 feet, bearing to the right, a distance of
17 .57 feet to the westerly line of a Right of Way known as Lake Way;
THENCE along said westerly line South 00 degrees 22 minutes 40
seconds East, a distance of 267.33 feet;
THENCE on a curve to the right having a radius of 36.23 feet, a dis-
tance of 57.67 feet to the northerly line of another right of way
known as Crescent Way;
THENCE along said northerly line and northeasterly line of said
Right of Way the following six (6) courses and distances:
1) North 89 degrees 10 minutes 20 seconds West, 125.09 feet;
2) North 64 degrees 41 minutes 20 seconds West, 43.36 feet;
3) North 35 degrees 33 minutes 20 seconds West, 43. 85 feet;
4) North 13 degrees 54 minutes 20 seconds West, 64.11 feet;
5) North 00 degrees 25 minutes 10 seconds East, 97.54 feet;
6) North 04 degrees 58 minutes 20 seconds East, 78.07 feet;
THENCE in a curve to the right having a radius of 9.65 feet, a dis-
tance of 22. 42 feet to the southerly line of the Right of Way known
as Laurel Way, aforementioned;
THENCE in a northeasterly direction along said Right of Way along
the arc of a circle a radius of 112.00 feet, bearing to the
left, a distance o et to point of tangent;
THENCE North 61 degrees 45 minutes 40 seconds East, 76.00 feet to the
point of BEGINNING.
BEING AND INTENDED TO BE premises conveyed to Walter H. Belz by
deed from Barbara Jazombek dated May 10, 1966 and recorded in the
Office of the Clerk of the County of Suffolk in Liber 6178 of Con-
veyances at Page 66 on July 3, 1967.
RECORnFn SEP .;zo 1,99q Ckth Of�uifolk Cub
Realand
surveying &
e
JUN 2 jq�� n
May 29, 1986 9
i
n
Mr. Roderick Van Tuyl e
Front Street At Main e
Greenport, N.Y. 11944 r
Re: Survey at
Sundown Farms
Dear Mr. Van Tuyl : n
9
I am in receipt of your letter dated May 15 , 1986
and after another review of our plans I am sorry to say
that I still can not agree .with your survey for the following P
reasons.
C
In April 1984 1 sent Mr. Anthony Abruzzo, L. S .
of our office to your firm requesting any information
that you may have in the vacinity of the above referenced
parcel. At that time we were told that you had no records
for that area. We therefore did our own research at the
County Center and compiled all the deeds that were available
in the area, (a list of same will be at the end of this
letter)
After compiling said deeds a Traverse Survey was
performed locating all existing survey markers in the area.
A Traverse was done from Sound Avenue south on Factory
Avenue to the L. I.R.R. east along the L. I .R. R. and back
north to Sound Avenue. Concrete monuments were located at
the north/east, south/east, south/west corners and along
the southerly side of the project. We also located a Dipe
at the westerly corner of the Dantes property and the '
distance of 133. 95 was respected to establish the north/east
corner of the said property, On your survey you show a
concrete monument at this corner which doesn' t exist.
You also make note to the same monument in your survey of
May 25, 1950 for Hallock. Is this the same monument?
Also on your Survey Amended December 12, 1985 you reference
a monument near the westerly line and being 9. 3 ' East,
mysteriously we have a reference to the same monument at
9. 0 ' East.
forty west main street * riverhead, n.y. 11901 9 (516) 369-1717
May 29 , 19806
I�oderick Van Tuyl
Page 2
Inversing from our north/west corner to north/east
corner, which was monumented, gave a distance of 520. 32
feet, which closely agrees wit�li the tax map distance of 518
feet more or less . Running along the westerly line as per
courses and distances of said deeds we agree with the
monument that was found in the* south/west corner of the
parcel.
Our chief of survey who performed all the field
work is a N.Y. S. Licensed Surveyor and was using the latest
state of the arts equipment. Our computor operator (Roger
Kaplan) who performed all computations is also a Licensed
N.Y. S . Land Surveyor. And myself who reviewed the entire
project is also a Licensed N.Y. S . Surveyor. All three of
us agreed on the final results of our project before it
was submitted for filing.
You are very welcome to come to our office to
review any of our notes or records .
Below are the deeds used in our determination
of the project,
L 7359 Pg. 477
L 7360 11g. 118-125 incl.
L 7962 Pg. 282
L 7123 Pg. 200
Should you have any questions , please feel free
to contact me.
Very truly yours
Raymond W. Donack, Sr.
RWD:cw
CC : Jack Davis '/
William Price
Joseph Stiefer
Barbara Kujawski
T LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
May 29, 1986
Mr. Shepard M. Scheinberg
Scheinberg, Schneps, DePetris and DePetris
Attorneys at Law
P.O. Box 599
Riverhead, NY 11901
Re: Sundown Farms Minor subdivision
Barbar a Kujawski
Dear Mr Scheinberg:
The Planning Board is in receipt of your correspondence
regarding the above.
We have referred this matter to our Town Attorney
for his review.
Please contact this office if you have any questions .
Very truly yours,
&VVW,+ 6 VLCW4�,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
SCHEIN13EIRC,, SCHNEps, DE PIETHIS & DF- PFTRIS
ATTOIRNEYS AT LAw
220 ROANoKE AviENuE
�OXT OPPICE BOX 509
SHEPARD M. SCHEINBERG RirvERFMAi:), NEw YonK
MURRAY B. SCHNEPS U901
EMIL F. DE PETRIS ISIDORE SCHEINBERG
RICHARD E. DE PETRIS (516) 7 2 7-5100
JANET GEASA May 23, 1986
Planning Board of
the Town of Southold
Town Hall, Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Att: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Re: Sundown Farms Minor Subdivision at Mattituck
Barbara Kujawski
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Our firm represents Barbara Kujawski and hereby requests from your
Board to make a final determination as to granting to Barbara
Kujawski the right to utilize the existing driveway access to her
two lots within Sundown Farms. When your Board initially approved
the Sundown Farms minor subdivision, the Board relied upon the
survey of Raymond Donack which showed that the driveway was within
the boundary lines of the subject premises. I am advised that a
survey had been prepared by Mr. VanTuyl showing that the driveway
encroached upon adjoining property of Sayre and Dantes . It is the
position of our firm and that of Barbara Kujawski that your Board
has no legal right to deny approval to Barbara Kujawski as to the
legal access over the travelled driveway where a guaranteed survey
was presented to your Board showing that the driveway is within
the boundary lines of the subject property. It is our further
opinion that should the Sayres and Dantes have reason to believe
that the travelled portion of the driveway is upon their property,
they should commence a legal proceeding to clarify the situation
and in no way should their position be taken into consideration by
your Board. Your Board is an administrative body, and not a court
of law.
We would hope that your Board would follow the recommendations as
set forth herein so that within 30 days from the date hereof,
Barbara Kujawski will be granted her 280A approval .
Very truly yours,
SMS:ez SHEPARD M. SCHEINBERG
cc: Ms. Barbara KujaWBki
William Price, Esq.
0,14 , I Co# /--�nr pz_o'!If�7 D vowp,
RODERICK VAN TUY�(L.S.) OTTO W.VAN TUYL
COLIN VANTUYL RODERICK VAN TUYL, P. C. I'mfessional Enginm fR@tir*d)
Umnwd I.And Su�yors MAY 4 U 1986
FRONT STREET AT MAIN
GREENPORT. NEW YORK 11944
(5161477,0170
May 15, 1986
Sealand Surveying & Engineering, P.C.
40 West Main Street
Riverhead, NY 11901
Attn: Raymond W. Donack, Sr.
Dear Mr. Donack:
It has been brought to our attention that a discrepancy exists
in the reported boundary-line between land surve3edby your firm for
"Sundown Farms" and lands surveyed by us for Barbara Sayre and others
at Mattituck. We have been requested to contact you with reference
to this matter.
The main point of difference appears to be in the road frontage
allotted to the "Sundown" tract, where your survey shows SOMO 520
feet compared to 505.53 feet shown on a map prepared by us for the
"original " owner, Mary Hallock, a copy of a portion of said map being
enclosed herewith. While it appears that we may be using the same
monumented starting point at "Sundowm!s" northeast corner, the direc-
tion of the line of Sound Avenue is also at variance, maki some
eight foot differential in a north-south direction at the northwest
corner of those premises.
Since the "Hallock-Sayre" line had been physically marked (and
re-marked or found) by us on several occasions between 1969 and 1985,
we find it hard to understand why your field survey and subsequent
"guaranteed" map did not reflect these markings as a recognized and
established delineation of the boundary-line in question. While the
courses &long said line are in agreement, the points of beginning do
not conform, and it is again difficult to comprehend thJs situation.
While the title company has apparently insured the purchaser's
ownership of what has been outlined on the "Sundown" map (an in-
surance seemingly based mainly on the survey map), we believe that
a more thourough search would have revealed some exceptions to the
claim of title to what has been portrayed on the map. One item of
interest is the location of the pole line, an easement for such
having been granted to LILCO by the Jazombek-Sayre interests many
years ago.
Far be it from us to suggest to another in oxir field of business
41�1
A4<'
77
Raymond W. nac Pat� :
May15, 1 ('36
how to per h! (n il F ,-;.bif, ior; b
among loca--.'7 been good policy
,; ,i eslabl V _,heck one another' F
records fo,,.- 'If 021110; 31at Irg t-, r_- �, os adjoining a par-
ticular pa--c-L ol J.E,� jr, f ac f
e ut_;"el parcel, in order
-�'l -D produce results
to co-ordii-L i �_r, eff.1 " i� I
that refle(. t :Lo ai�be � i al c )nffli( ,a.
In adci . :�on t,o _ 13 ',JFL:_1,jck11 ,i,ip, " In--losing copies
of recent EV.,leya fo
conditions, showing existing
I �-ele(' roa . 3,nd lot corners7
These are eul iitt * ,d dlit we trust may be '
a re-evaluat� .,n o
map. t t" :'Or ';t F) U;,Ic slio (n �Dn the "Sundown"
As you i- n do�ibt -.hO T:)4!1 )if Sou;hold is in the
process of Li-, pec�;in,.� �.Iit rig1t.-o1' � 10-,11jr 3c .s shown on that map
for "approv3d acct!ss it ff
that the abov ci..-r-jul it, of this inspection
I
z) ere:its (�ncellriod inf;endod to be preservod.
rights and i, hal,re tf) with all legal
The Town Insp. ctor, h :1 ' lavi'l , iE �:')_�illg 'iis review and report
in abeyance u� til 1-1he )]:�c lem iE;Ls
Apprecia" Lng joil, r, ind _11ge;tni Ir, tn U: matter, we await you:r,
early reply.
1,rofessionaLl
cc :
Barbara qrs
Jack Dav' �i, B.Ilct rk,�, Alapeclo*
Memorandum to: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Date: May- 14, 1986
Southold Town Planning Board
From: John W. Davis
Re: Sundown Farms at Mattituck - Location of common north-south
property line (Sundown Farms-west side) and the Dantes and
Sayre property (East side)
Comments:
This section of the above property line survey was re-established today by
Donack as requested by Mrs. B. Kujawski. The Donack plans dated 9/12/84
were used.
Today's survey was also witnessed by B. Kujawski, J. Stiefer and Mr. & Mrs. Sayre.
Mrs. Sayre has a property survey by Van Tuyl dated 2/26/85 that shows the
traveled way all within that property and the 20 ft. R.O.W. . The Donack survey
is considerably different as to the location of the common property line in this
area.
R. Van Tuyl, as requested by B. Kujawski, came on the site in the P.M. after the
Donack survey party had left. He brought a survey map dated 5/25/50 (Map of
farm owned by Mary E. Hallock) which covers the same area now known as Sundown
Farms. This map shows the north side of the property along Sound Avenue (named
North Road previously) at 505.53 L.F. instead of 520.32 ft . as shown by Donack,
a difference of almost 15 ft. This lesser length accounts for some of the
differences in the property lines (East side) at the Dantes and Sayre property
as shown on the Van Tuyl and Donack maps.
The correct length of the north side (along Sound Avenue) for Sundown Farms
should be determined. The lesser length, 505.53 ft. ) , would affect the total
length of Sundown Farms (west side) for location, total acreage, etc.
May 15, 1986
R. Van Tuyl gave me a copy of the 1950 Hallock Farm map. Comparision of the
two maps (Donack and Van Tuyl) show the difference in bearing and length at the
north side, a small difference in bearing and length in the last course (south
end) of the east side and a difference in length of 16.94 ft. at the southwest
corner at the south end of the property. Donack shows 90.96 ft. , Van Tuyl
74.02 ft. This compares more or less with the difference in length of the two
surveys at the north end. All other dimensions and bearings are the same.
I reviewed the deeds from the Planning Board files, one for the Sundown Farms
and one for Lot No. 3. They both conform to the Donack survey throughout.
Note: The length of 520.30 ft. (Donack) for the subdivision length along
Sound Avenue has been circled in the subdivision deed. Others may have found
the discrepancy in the two surveys for that distance.
I would recommend that nothing be done as to updating the access to Sundown Farms
until the status of the common property line has been resolved.
John W. Davis
CIK
6 F
P D
T - LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
April 28, 1986
Mr. Chris Dantes
Sound Avenue
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Access road
"Sundown Farms"
Dear Mr. Dantes :
In accordance with your request, enclosed herewith is a
copy of the minutes of the Planning Board meeting of April
14, 1986 regarding the above mentioned access road.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN SOUT.'
PWN_PbANNING BOARD
P e-
y iane M Sch" ultze,ffSecretary
enc.
Page 3 *22/84
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there have no been no comments from the Department of
E nvironmental Conservation in the allotted, it is assumed
that that agency has no objections .
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no
objectionto our designation of lead agency, they are in
agreement with our initial determination. The Department
has received an application and it is complete . The Health
Department maintains final jurisdiction over location of
disposal and well systems and the applicant should not under
take to construct any water supply or disposal system with-
out Health Department Approval .
The project will meet all the requirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M-. Schul-tze,
secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York
11971
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Ward
Mr. Orlowski: I will declare this hearing closed. Thank you all
for coming.
7 :45 p.m. Public Hearing on the question of approval of the minor
subdivision of "Sundown Farms" Joseph and Patricia Steiffer applicants
located at Mattituck, 4 lot s on 27 .52 acres .
On a motion made by Mr. Mullen, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board dispense with the
reading of the metes and bounds for the minor subdivision of
Sundown Farms , located at Mattituck, containing 27 acres .
Vote of the Board: Ayes : Orlowski, MUllen, Latham, Ward
Mr. Orlowski: We have proof of publication in the Suffolk Times ,
October 1984 signed by Anna Lekas, notorized by Judith Chien and
also proof of publication from the Long Island Traveler Watchman
signed by Pat Wood and notorized by Barbara Forbes . At this time
the covenants and restrictions are not back from Tasker' s office,
but they have been submitted and they are basically what we asked
for. At this time I will ask for any objections to this minor
subdivision? (hearing none) Is there anybody in favor of this
Minor subdivdsion?
,10
_T Page 4 10/22/84
Mr. Bruer: Yes , Mr. Chairman, Rudolph Bruer, on behalf of Mr.
and Mrs . Steiffer. I believe everything has been put before the
Board already, and said. And, we respectfully request that the
Board approve the mapa and sign it as soon as possible. I aks ,
we ask, on behalf of Mr. Steiffer that it be done as soon as
possible because he has a practical problem in thathe wants
to build on the property and the weather, although, it is hard
to believe today, bad weather could set in and we could have
difficulty and a problem come this spring if he does not have
a foundation in. Thank you very much.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay, is there anybody else who would like to
comment in favor? Hearing none is there anybody out there neither
pro nor con but may have information pertaining to this minor
subdivision that the -Board sould know about? Hearing none.
I will ask questions of the Board, Mr. Mullen (none) , Mr. Latham
(none) , Mr. Ward, (none) . Okay, at this time I will just read
Mr. Davis ' report and comments . "The read noted as a 10; ' travelled
road is somewhate in error. attached is a copy of the road width
down to about the last utility pole from Sound Avenue . Thss from
report 369 datedd 6/7/84 fron the Board of Appeals . The above
length has been stabilized with sand and gravel for depths of from 20
to 4" . The profile is acceptable but there are potholes and depressions
throughout. Going south except for the first 250 ft. there is a wooded
area on the left side and open land on the right side . This section
would probably not present problems for emergency equipment. The
remaining length is 8 ft. in width and in a wooded area throughout
It has been stabliized with sand and small gravel. A few test holes
indicated depths of 3" . The profile is acceptable but there are a few
irregularities . Most of the length is below the adjacent ground
level . In some areas the road sides slope up for from 2 ft. to 4 ft.
with trees near the top of the slopes . The 700 ft. section of the
raod is passable as of the present time. Emergency equipment would have
to turn around via driveways . If the aligmment of the present road
is to be accepted for access even though parts of it are in propoerty
owned by others , it should be repaired apd updated. I would recommend
the following: 1. Fill the potholes and depressions in the first
2000 fet and bring in additional bankrun sand and gravel to provide
a 6" depth. The width for the first 250 ft. would have to be 8 ft.
due to trees . The remaining 1750 ft. of 2000 could be 10 ft. in
width or more. 2 . The last 700 ft. should have the few high
areas leveled and additional bankrun brought in to also provide a
6" depth. Widening the present width would involve grading and
tree removal. . 3 . Place a compacted 2" top course of 3/4" stone
blend on the bankrun for the full length of the road. " Also I have
a letter from a Mrs . Barbara Sayre . It says "I , Barbara B. Sayre,
own some of the adjacent property to the west. Iown some of the
right-of-way ) (a dirt farmroad, my driveway) known as Laurel Lake
Road which passes over my property. I do not object to apprcval
of the subdivision, but I want to be undeTs—tood as to be
objection to the use of the right-of-way which passes over
my property. This is not easy to write . I would attend the
hearing but I am to be in Florida on October 22 , 1984 . My husband,
Robert Sayre , is at home if Mr. Steiffer wishes to talk with him.
If Mr. STeifer intends to put in his own right-of0way on his
property adjacent to my property that is okay with me. of course ,
I am just .not granting him premission to use my property as bus
right-of-way. Is this clear? Sorry if the words sound so harsh
I am not speaking them that way. I wish to be neighborly...
Psge 5 /22/84
Mr. ORlowski: I don' t, the right-of-way is there and it has been
used. I take it is a common right-of-way.
Mr. Bruer: Mr. Steiffer informs me that the entrance way from
Main Rd. that she uses is actually on his property.
Mr. Orlowski: Okay. Does the Board have any questions at this
time?
David Emilita- Mr. Chairman, I have a question as the covenants
and restrictions .
Mr. Orlowski: The C and R's state that lot Db 1 , the large lot,
will not be subdivided any more than a minor subdivision.
Mr. Emilita: They already did aninor.
Mr. Orlowski: Any further than a minor, than four lots , no more
than four lots . That is in the covenant and restriction that we
have now.
Mr. Emilita: We are creating four lots now, this is the minor on
the parcel .
Mr. Orlowski: Right.
Mr. Emilita: The next subdivision would be a major.
Mr. Orlowski: In our approvalwe could put in, yes .
Mr . Emilita: So, in other words , there may be further subdivision.
Mr. Orlowski: But not parcel 1 , parcel I only. Two, three and four
are covenanted in perpuity as to no further subdivision. , and we have
that and it is at Mr. Tasker's office now. Lot NO. I is no more than
four lots and if you want we could make that now.
Mr. Bruer: I might state that there is no intention to subdivide, it
is something like 13 acres and it is right on Main Road.
Mr. Orlowski: Are you going to give - us a covenant to that effect?
Mr. Bruer: As to two, three and four, yes .
Mr. Orlowski: What about Lot No. 17
Mr. Bruer: I will do that.
Mr. Orlowski : On Lot No. 1 too?
Mr. Bruer: That it will never be subdivided into more than four lots .
That is not a suprise, that was said in the beginning. You are talking
about 27 acres .
Mr. Orlowski : In that it would have to conform to a major in that
the road would have to be fixed up.
Mr. Bruer: They are going to service Lot No. I with another road
anyway.
Page 6 0/22/84
Mr. Orlowski: If I was doing that, I would make sure it is 50' .
Mr. Joseph Steiffer: It would have to be fifty feet just to service
four lots .
Mr. Orlowski: Not now, but if it was to come in again, it would
come in as a major. So we will put that in there. Anyother
questions? Hearing none, I will declare this hearing closed.
Thank you all for coming down.
On a motion made by Mr. Latham, seconded by Mr. Ward it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Boardobclare itself lead
agency with regard to the subdivision of Ronald Strain located
at Cutchogue under the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
Vote of the Board: 'Ayes : Orlowski, Mullen, Latham, Ward
On a motion made by Mr. Ward, seconded by Mr. Latham the following
action was taken.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617 , Section
617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The Minor subdivision of Ronald Strain as applied for by
Richard Miraglia, is located at Cutchogue and contains 4 lots on
8.6 acres.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons :
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no correspondence from the Department
of Environmental Conservation in the alotted time it is
assumed that they have no objections or concerns .
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no
objection to our status of lead agency, they are in
agreement with our initial determination and there is
no record of an application to their department. The
Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location
of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not
undertake to construct any Water supply or disposal system
without Health Department approval .
P D
T LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
April 21, 1986
Mrs. Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, NY 11952
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mrs . Kujawski:
The Planning Board reviewed the file for the above mentioned
subdivision on Friday, April 18 , 1986.
It was the consensus of the Board to request that the access
road for the lots within this subdivision be improved within the
25 ' right-of-way on the westerly side of the premises as shown
on the approved subdivision map of October 9, 1984.
Please note, the right-of-way will have to be improved to
a 15 ' width in accordance with the recommendations of Inspector
John W. Davis.
Would you please stake out the right-of-way and advise
our office when this has been done so we may notify our Inspector.
Thank you.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
a- nnci±�
�I Rd N
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CH MA
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
cc: Rudy Bruer, esq.
0
APR 0 IS80
Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Mattituck, New York 11952
April 9, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mr. Orlowski and Board Members:
Re: Access Road, Sundown Farms, Sound Ave. , Mattituck.
I received a COPY Of Mr. Davis' report (April 9, 1986) concern-
ing the present condition of the access road, Sundown Farms.
I would like to make a few comments concerning this report.
Mr. Davis, initial report , October 22, 1984, asked for a width
of 101 ( Report No. 400 - #1 ) , the April 9th Davis report recom-
mends a width of 161 . This change will entail the removal of
a great many large trees and stumps (as statdd in Mr. Davis'
Oct . 22, 1984 Report) . I do not believe it is fair to change
the rules i.n the middle of the game; not to mention, the expense
of having the road brought to the original specifications.
Furthermore, Mr. Davis wants i" more of stone blend brought
in for the entire length of the road. Walter Gatz was hired
and paid last year to bring the road up to the specifications
Put forth by the October 22, 1984 Report and states he did this
work last summer and this shortage is normal road disintegration.
I would like to add that Mr. Gatz is the owner of Lot No. 4 in
this subdivision, and therefore has a vested interest in this
road.
I am still without a 280-A approval, and wish this matter
to be resolved as soon as Possible. Thank you for your prompt
attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
Barbara Kujawski
4
6 A& 9 1986
To: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Report No. 495
Southold Town Planning Board
From: John W. Davis Date: April 2, 1986
Re: Sundown Farms - Minor Subdivision at Mattituck. Present condition
of access road from Sound Avenue to end of property.
Comments:
As of present date the road surface has been smoothed by Ray Nine (done
a few days ago) . The last 700 ft. of this access was not worked on.
The potholes were filled by scraping the road width with a grading box.
No additional material was brought in. According to Ray Nine this
grading operation was all that he was asked to do. His charge for this
work was $ 140.00. The existing road surface prior to any work by the
contractor who did the initial work in 1985 was hard packed in most
areas and had areas with potholes. I do not know when this initial
work was done or how much bankrun material was brought in. However
depths as per report by L. M. Tuthill on February 6, 1986 show an average
depth of 5.4" of bankrun, an average width of 11 ft.± and an average
stone blend depth of 1 .4". Six of the ten test holes show I" of stone
blend.
As of 4/2/86 the road is passable. The potholes that have been corrected
by the smoothing operation will occur again in wet weather as they are
now filled with loose material.
I agree with the Tuthill report of February 3, 1986 that widening the
road in the last 700 ft. to 16 ft. for the length and location as noted
in that report to provide passage for two vehicles.
I would not recommend final acceptance of this access road until addit-
ional stone blend was brought in to provide a 2" compacted depth throughout.
John W. Davis
Barbara Kujawski
P.O. Box 1113
Sound Avenue
Mattituck, New York 11952
734-5451
April 3, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski
Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision
"Sundown Farms"
Sound Ave. , Mattituck
Dear Mr. Orlowski :
With regard to the access road, on the above referenced
minor subdivision, I have been waiting since December, 1985
for 280 A approval. I have complied with all the specifications
you required for the Minor Subdivision, and would appreciate
your assistance in issuing the necessary 280 A approval.
I believe that I have been more than patient and cooperative,
and look for a timely resolution of this matter.
Sincerely,
4w,u �Kr
Barbara Kujawski
BK: cjh
P
D
LD
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
February 25, 1986
Mr. John W. Davis
Sterling Road
Cutchogue, NY 11935
Re: Sundown Farms
located at Mattituck
Dear Mr. Davis:
The Planning Board has requested that you make an
inspection on the right-of-way within the above mentioned
subdivision.
Would you also, please, advise us as to what additional
work needs to be done on the right-of-way in order to meet
the requirements set forth in Your report No. 400 dated
October 19 , 1984.
Enclosed for your review, is a copy of the subdivision
map and report No. 400.
Please don' t hesitate to contact us if You have any
questions.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
LAWRENCE M. TUTHILL
PROFES91ONAL KNOINKER
INLET L^NE EXT.
GREENPORT. N.Y. 11944
GRMZMP0RT 7-16S2
February 10, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 119?l
He' Roads of minor subdimision entitled #Smndown Farms-,
off Sound Avenue, Mattituck
Gentlemens
On February 6# 1986 1 made 0 test berings at the above
mentioned site, and the findings are noted on the att4shed sketch.
The borings were taken in the miMle of the road.
In the report of Feb 3 noted that ap-eared a dusting, in
that the surface contained a small amount of stone. The borings
indicate that there Is a high percentage of fines. The high
presense of the fines does not delete from the effectiveness
of the stone blend.
The deterioration of the road appears to be from the use
others than from the use by the 4 new lots since only is in
the stages of being used. The design specs for this read are
certainly adequate for a 4 lot subdivision, but will not stand
up with the amount of traffic without a constant maintenance
program.
Respectifully submitted,
- Sfohc $ fend2z S 6 P + B2 9 'Vt/
$� De ptbra'�
V„ w ii A
24 5 8�
T P O Tele
�tiahe Poe
x O'l,P7 Ilrgt Pte,.'
so
n' /z° w
fv J
J
J
KI /"S � ' B1( lY N/
w
J
x
I
I
I
�c3rs rea�Y x� ` S G" 8R /2 " VV
i
f
I
I
i
,/P oy ! I
t3 x / ' S S Y B /Z /0, vV
1p /0 , K/
Skrrc. 11
so r ,n � D Cello la
' Sound Avenue— SUNDotjN 9A I?PI ✓
Public Works Department 6 RECIa
Town of Southold
Peconic Lane
Peconic, N.Y. 11958
RAYMONDL.JACOBS
Commissioner Tel.765-3140
734-5211
February 6, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms - Minor subdivision - Roads off Sound Ave.
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I have discussed the roads of the above mentioned subdivision
with Mr. Jack Davis and Mr. Larry Tuthill. After reviewing
Mr. Davis' report no. 400, 1 am in agreement with his recommendations.
;Res ectfully,
s
77,
�Xond L. Ja s
R s
Superintendent of Highways
RLJ/plm
C�
LAWRENCE M. TUTHILL
PROFE9810NAL RNMINKER
INLET L^NK EXT.
FEB3 P.E CID 13R EE NPORT, N.Y. 111344
7-1652
February 3, 1986
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Res Roads of minor subdivision entilled "Sundown Farms"
off Sound "'venue, Mattituck
Gentlexiens
On January 31, 1986, Mr. John Davis and I made an
Inspection of the above mentioned project.
It appeared that a minimum amount of work had been done
on this road. With reference toMr. Davis's report No. 400
dated October 19,1984, the potholes and depressions still remain.
There is little evidence that the depth of the bankrun $and
and gravel has been added to increase the depth to provide
a 6" bs,se. There is evidence of a top coverage of 3/4" stone
blend, but in the terms of Mr. Davis it is dust a dusting.
It is noted that the last 700' of this road in rather narrow
as it goes through the woods and it recommended that a 16'
Wide road 30* long section be created about 200& 4 Ift MIX
the beginAng of the 700' so as to be in lot no. 4 to
provide passage for two vehicles.
Respectfully submitted,
T NM LD
S y y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
December 30 , 1985
Mr. Lawrence Tuthill
Town Engineer
1215 Inlet Lane
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Subdivision "Sundown Farms" (Steifer)
access road
Dear Mr. Tuthill:
Enclosed is a subdivision map for the above mentioned
approved subdivision, as well as, a copy of Inspector John
W. Davis ' report indicating the necessary improvements.
Our office has been informed that the improvements have
been made, and a final inspectionis requested on the work done.
we would appreciate an inspection and report at your
earliest convenience.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office.
Very truly yours,
LC
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enc.
T D
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
December 6 , 1984
Mr. Rudolph Bruer
Attorney at Law
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re: sundown Farms
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning
Board, December 3 , 1984 .
RESOLVED that the Southold -Town Planning Board override
the Suffolk County Planning Commission' s resolution of disapproval
withiegard to the minor subdivisialof Sundown Farms located at
Mattituck.
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact
our office . When the Chairman has endorsed the maps , we will return
one to your office, one has been signed and returned to the applicant.
Very truly yours ,
JR. , CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze , Secretary
NOV 2 0 1984
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971
(SI6)765-1222
LEFFERTS P. EDSON November 19, 1984 (516)765-2500
RUDOLPH H. SRUER
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Sundown Farms
Mattituck, N.Y.
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
I have reviewed the letter addressed to your office from the County of
Suffolk Department of Planning, dated November 9, 1984, in which they
disapprove the above-referenced subdivision map for the following reasons:
1. The back three (3) lots would be landlocked;
2. There is potential for future subdivision
3. No provision for runoff onto the County Road;
4. No provision for runoff to the pond located on Lot A.
It is obvious from this decision that County Planning either did not look
at this subdivision application with any care whatsoever or, if they did,
it was done in an unlighted, dark room or hurriedly after a very heavy lunch.
It is clearly shown on the subdivision map that the back three lots are not
landlocked and that they are served by a right of way which also serves other
properties in the area to the south of the premises. As you know, this right
of way was discussed extensively by the undersigned and your Board throughout
the course of the application procedure.
A denial based upon Lot #1 not providing for runoff, due to construction on
the property, is ludicrous. Lot #1 contains an area of more than 13 acres.
The dwelling to be constructed thereon will be a considerable distance from
the County Road and, further, with or without subdivision approval, one house
could be built on this property and any sane person would know that there
would be no runoff problem. For this to be an objection by County Planning
can only be blamed on the then coming full moon, as it makes no sense at all.
As to Lot #4, the size of the lot negates any viable reason for providing
for runoff to the pond shown on the map and, if nothing else, cannot be con-
sidered by a prudent person as being a reason for the denial of the subdivision.
B. Orlowski, Chairman -2- November 19, 1984
Further evidence of the lack of thoughtful reasoning by County Planning
is their second listed reason for disapproval, potential future subdivision.
A quick review of this file will show that it was conditioned upon no future
subdivision of Lots 2, 3 & 4, and that Lot #1 would only be subdivided in
the future on the basis of it being considered a major subdivision, limited
to no more than four lots.
On behalf of my clients, and on the basis of the above observations, we
respectfully request that the Southold Town Planning Board override the
disapproval of this subdivision made by the County of Suffolk Department
of Planning.
Since el y,
Rudolph H4 Bruer
RHB/df
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Stiefer
William H. Price, Jr., Esq.
KOV 14 1984
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971
(516)765-1222
LEFFERTS P. EDSON November 13, 1984 (516)765-2500
RUDOLPH H. BRUER
Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
In connection with the Planning Board's resolution of 11/5/84, we enclose
herewith a certified copy of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions
filed with the Suffolk County Clerk on November 9, 1984. This filing is
in satisfaction of your condition for approval numbered "I".
Please advise when the review of this subdivision has been completed by
the Suffolk County Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
R f Y JHY ua"(!Ij
R14B/
Enc.
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Stiefer
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK KOV 14 1984
0 1
PETER F. COHALAN
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING LEE E.KOPPELMAN
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
November 9, 1984
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Town of Southold Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision - Sundown Farms
Southerly side of Sound Avenue approximately 737 feet
westerly from the intersection of Sound Avenue and
Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York.
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
The Suffolk County Planning Commission at its regular meeting on November
7, 1984, reviewed the proposed subdivision plat entitled, "Minor Subdivision -
Sundown Farms", referred to it pursuant to Section 1333 of the Suffolk County
Charter. After due study and deliberation it resolved to disapprove said map
for the following reasons:
1. The proposed subdivision will result in the creation of three land-
locked parcels; that is, parcels that do not have frontage on an
existing or proposed public road. The creation of such lots is con-
trary to good subdivision layout principles and creates problems as
far as access by emergency and service equipment is concerned; this
could result in health, safety and welfare problems for the future
residents of these lots. Creation of landlocked lots also places
the Zoning Board of Appeals in the awkward position of having to
grant a building permit for each of these lots under Secti-o—n 280-a
of the Town Law as the future owners of these lots cannot be held
responsible for the landlocked nature of the parcels.
2. Each of these lots has the potential to be subdivided thereby placing
further dependence on the right-of-way as access.
3. No information was provided to show that development adjacent to the
county road would be restricted to prevent stormwater runoff from
entering the right-of-way.
4. No information was provided to show that measures would be required to
protect the pond at the southerly end of the tract from the adverse
impacts of development; i.e. , stormwater runoff, erosion, placement of
sanitary disposal facilities.
VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY L
HAUPPAUGE.L.I.,NEW YORK 1 1788
1516)360-5192
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. 2 November 9, 1984
Re: �Unor Subdivision - Sundown Farms
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also offers the following comments on the map for your use
and consideration:
The subdivider should be required to revise the layout of the proposed sub-
division. The revised layout should provide a proposed public road for adequate
access to each lot. It should also be shown that there is an adequate building
envelope on Lot 4 to insure that there will not be any adverse impact upon the
pond and that all stormwater runoff will be contained within the tract by ade-
quate drainage structures so that the runoff will not flow into Sound Avenue.
Very truly yours,
Lee E. Koppelman
Director of Planning
by
Charles G. Lina, Chief Planner
Subdivision Review Section
File: S-SD-84-19
CGL:jk
Encl. : Map
cc: A. Barton Cass, Commissioner, SCDPW
R. A. Villa, P.E. , SCDHS
i
� _ `� 'r��'�,���,G � 119 "�`��'✓�v
x
P3: 56
J
c�
L�
w-I
UW9674 FAcE 435
SCHEDnE A
ALL that certain' plot, piece, or parcel of land, situate, lying, and being
at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,
being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue where same is
intersected by the northeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Mets Homes,
Inc. ;
THENCE North 77 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds East along the southerly side of
Sound Avenue 520.32 feet to land now or formerly of Wirtz;
THENCE South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds East along last mentioned land
and along land now or formerly of O'Connell, 1,984.85 feet;
THENCE South 21 degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East along last mentioned land
603.59 feet;
THENCE still along land now or formerly of O'Connell the following five (5)
courses and distances:
1) North 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West 110.86 feet;
2) South 86 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West 230.31 feet;
3) South 48 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds West 190.75 feet;
4) South 81 degrees 23 minutes 10 seconds West 126.72 feet;
5) South 48 degrees 52 minutes 50 seconds West 90.96 feet to land now or
formerly of Macari;
THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East along last mentioned land
700.001 feet;
THENCE North 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West along last mentioned land
115.50 feet;
THENCE North 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds West along last mentioned land
740.80 feet;
THENCE North 24 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West along last mentioned land
496.97 feet;
THENCE North 26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West along land now or formerly
of Sayre 324.08 feet;
THENCE North 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds West along land now or formerly
of Sayre 141.15 feet;
THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West along land now or formerly
of Meta Homes, Inc. 172.50 feet to the southerly side of Sound Avenue at the
point or place of BEGINNING.
OCT 2 9 1984
ATTORNEYS AT t-AW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
LEFFERTS P. EDSON October 26, 1984 (516)765-1222
RUDOLPH H. eRUER (SIG)765-2500
Robert W. Tasker, Esq.
425 Main Street
Greenport, New York 11944
Re: Minor Subdivision
Sundown Farms
Mattituck, N.Y.
Dear Bob:
At the recommendation of the Chairman of the Southold Town Planning Board,
and in the essence of time, we forward herewith a copy of revised Declaration
of Covenants and Restrictions in the above matter for your review.
Pursuant to your recommendation, we have made the addition of covenant #2.
In accordance with your recent conversation with William H. Price, Jr., we
have identified Joseph Steifer and Particia Steifer as the owners of the
subject property, as they will be taking title to same on November 8, 1984.
We respectfully request that you advise the Planning Board on this matter
as soon as possible, and prior to their November 5, 1984 meeting.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Rudolph H. Bruer
RHB/df
Enc.
cc: Joseph Steifer
Bennett Orlowski, Jr.
William H. Price, Jr., Esq.
z 9 1984
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this day of 198 , by
JOSEPH STEIFER and PATRICIA STEIFER, residing at (No number)
Leonard Street , Wading River , New York 11792, hereinafter
referred to as "DeclarantsH.
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Declarants are the owners in fee simple of a
tract of land at Mattituck, Town of Southold , Suffolk County, New
York, shown on a certain subdivision map entitled "Preliminary
Plan of Proposed minor Subdivision, Sundown Farms, at Mattituck,
Town of Southold , Suffolk Co . , N.Y." , a metes and bounds
description of which is shown on Schedule "A" as attached hereto
and made a part hereof, and referred to herein as the "premises",
and
WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the
Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to subdivide
the said real property into four parcels, and
WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said
approval , the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed
it to be for the best interests of the Town of Southold and the
owners and prospective owners of said parcels that the within
covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcels , and as a
condition of said approval said Planning Board has required that
the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's
Office, and
WHEREAS, the Declarants have considered the foregoing and
determined that the same will be for the best interests of the
Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcels,
NOW, THEREFORE,THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH:
That the Declarants , for the purposes of carrying out the
intentions above expressed, does hereby make known, admit ,
publish , covenant and agree that the said premises herein
described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants
which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all
purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors,
legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to
wit :
1. That there shall be no further subdivision of the lots
shown as numbers 2 , 3 & 4 on said subdivision plan , in
perpetuity.
2. That any further subdivision of lot numbered 1 on said
subdivision plan will be considered a major subdivision and shall
not exceed four (4) lots .
3. That , except as set forth in paragraphs numbered I and 2
above , Declarants reserve the right to impose additional
covenants and restrictions , and further reserve the right to
modify, change and/or annul any such additional covenants and
restrictions that may be imposed from time to time in the future.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Declarants have duly executed this
Declaration on the day and year first above written.
Joseph Steifer
Patricia Steifer
STATE OF NEW YORK
SS . :
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
On the day of 198 , before me personally came
Joseph Steifer and Patricia Steifer , to me known to be the
individuals described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same.
(Notary Public)
2
SCHEDULE A
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying
and being at Mattituck, Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and
State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue, said
point being approximately 737 feet west of the intersection of
Cox Neck Road and Sound Avenue ; and from said point of beginning ,
RUNNING along lands now or formerly of Wirtz and lands now or
formerly of O'Connell , South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds
East, 1984.85 feet;
THENCE along said lands now or formerly of O'Connell , South 21
degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East , 603. 59 feet;
THENCE along lands now or formerly of O'Connell the following
five (5) courses and distances :
(1) North 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West , 110.86 feet ;
(2) South 86 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West , 230. 31 feet ;
(3) South 48 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds West , 190 .75 feet ;
(4) South 81 degrees 23 minutes 10 seconds West , 126. 72 feet;
(5) South 48 degrees 52 min utes 50 seconds West , 90. 96 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East ,
700. 01 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West ,
115. 50 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds West ,
740.80 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 24 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West ,
496. 97 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West ,
324. 08 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds West ,
141 .15 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West ,
172. 50 feet to the southerly line of Sound Avenue;
RUNNING THENCE along said southerly line of Sound Avenue , North
77 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds East, 520.32 feet to the point
or place of BEGINNING.
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DESIGNATION:
DIST. 1000, SEC. 121 .00, BLK. 04 .00 , LOT 008 . 000
OCT 2 5 19"A
40
f Ubilf
OFFI
#ORNEY
ROBERT W.TASKER D TELEPHONE
Town Attorney (516) 477-1400
425 MAIN ST.
GREENPORT, L.I., NEW YORK 11944
October 24, 1984
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Benny:
By letter received today, you have asked my review of the proposed
declaration of covenants and restrictions relative to the above.
I have the following comments:
1. On October 8, 1984, the Planning Board approved the sketch map
and, among other things, required amended covenants and
restrictions to provide that Lot No. I will only be subdivided into
four lots in the future.
2. On Page 2, paragraph 1 of the declaration provides "That there
shall be no further subdivision of lots shown as numbers 2, 3 & 4
on said subdivision plan, in perpetuity, exML thLtdec argt�
rt uIE a peaL
r tR t tV
divide lot #1 as a minor subdivision. e
Ue—ci'sionwit � respect to Lot I does not conform to the Planning
Board resolution.
3. The first "WHEREAS" clause of the declaration states that the
declarants are "contract vendees". If this is true, it is apparent
that the declarants are not the owners of the premises as of this
date. Therefore, I would recommend that the declaration be
executed by the contract vendor and the contract vendee.
Yours very truly,
ROBERT W. TASKER
RWT :aa
� � Sao
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Hearing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Section 276 of
the Town Law, public hearings will be held by the Southold
Town Planning Board at the Town Hall ,Main Road, Southold, New
YOrk in said town on the 22nd day of October, 1984 , on the
questionof the following:
7 :45 p.m. Approval of the minor subidivision of Joseph
and Patricia Steifer, subdivision to be known as "Sundown Farms"
located at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, and
State of New YOrk and bounded and described as follows :
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue
said point being approximately 737 feet west of the intersection
of Cox Neck road and Sound Avenue ; and from said point of beginning ,
RUNNING along lands now or fermerly of Wirtz and lands now or
formerly of O 'Connell , S . 210 49 ' 20" E. 1984 .85 feet; THENCE
along said lands now or formerly of O 'Connell , S . 21 0
49140" E. , 603 .59 feet. THENCE
along said lands now or formerly of O 'Connell the following five
courses and distances : ( 1) N. 89041 ' 00" W. 110 .86 feet, (2) S .
86056 ' 00" W. 230.31 feet; (3) S . 48015 ' 50" W. 190.75 feet; (4)
S . 81023 ' 10" W. 126 .72 feet ; (5) S . 48 0 52 ' 50" W. 90 . 96 feet;
RUNNING THENCE N . 010 15 ' 00" E . 700. 01 feet; RUNNING THENCE
N. 23000 - 00" W. 115 .50 feet; RUNNING THENCE N. 20053 ' 50" W.
740.80 feet; RUNNING THENCE N. 24 0 01 ' 50" W. 496 . 97 feet ; RUNNING
THENCE N. 26057 ' 20"W. 324 . 08 feet ; RUNNING THENCE N. 43 0 08 ' 50"
West, 141 . 15 feet ; RUNNING THENCE N. 21 0 30 ' 00" W. , 172 .50 feet to
the southerly line of Sound Avenue ; RUNNING THENCE along said
southerly line of Sound Avenue , North 77 0 34 ' 38" E. , 520 .32 feet to
the point or place of BEGINNING. Containing 27 .5285 acres .
Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter should
appear at the time and place above specified.
BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING
BOARD
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
PLEASE PUBLISH ONCE*110' ctober 11 , 1984 AND FORW# ONE AFFIDAVIT
OF PUBLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD, MIAN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK, 11971
Copies mailed to the following October 9 , 1984 :
Long Island Traveler-Watchman
Suffolk Times
Rudolph Bruer, Attorney for Applicant
Supervisor Murphy
P D
T D
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
October 9 , 1984
Mr. Rudolph Bruer
Attorney at Law
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Re : Joseph and Patricia Steiffer
minor subdivision
Dear Mr. Bruer:
The following action was taken by the Southold Town
Planning Board, Monday, October 8 , 1984 .
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board approve
the sketch map of "Sundown Farms" located at Mattituck for
4 lots on 27 .5 acres , plan dated may 4 , 1984 subject to receipt
of six (6) surveys indicating the right-of-way extended
throught lot No. 4 and amended covenants and restrictions
stating that Lot No. 1 will only be subdivided into four (4)
lots in the future.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set
Monday, October 22 , 1984 at 7 :45 p.m. at the Southold Town
Hall , Main Road, Southold as the time and place for a public
hearing on the question of approval of the minor subdivision
of Joseph and Patricia Steiffer known as "Sundown Farms" .
Enclosed is a copy of the legal notice to be published
in the papers . If you have any questions , please don't hesitate
to contact our office.
Very truly yours ,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,C HAIRMAN
5DUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
b�'D 3"an e �M 9cyh jkrtcre tary
enc .
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS
DECLARATION made this day of 198 by
JOSEPH STEIFER and PATRICIA STEIFER , residing at
R.R. # 1 , (No number) Leonard Street , Wading River,
New York 11792, hereinafter referred to as the "Declarants".
W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS, the Declarants are the contract vendees of a tract
of land at Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,
shown on a certain subdivision map entitled "Preliminary Plan of
Proposed Minor Subdivision, Sundown Farms, at Mattituck, Town of
Southold, Suffolk Co., N.Y.", a metes and bounds description of
which is shown on Schedule "A" as attached hereto and made a part
hereof, and referred to herein as the "premises", and
WHEREAS, the Declarants have made application to the
Planning Board of the Town of Southold for approval to subdivide
the said real property into four parcels, and
WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of said
approval , the Planning Board of the Town of Southold has deemed
it to be for the best interests of the Town of Southold and the
owners and prospective owners of said parcels that the within
covenants and restrictions be imposed on said parcels, and as a
condition of said approval said Planning Board has required that
the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk County Clerk's
Office, and
WHEREAS, the Declarant has considered the foregoing and
determined that the same will be for the best interests of the
Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcels,
NOW, THEREFORE,THIS DECLARATION WITNESSETH:
That the Declarant , for the purposes of carrying out the
intentions above expressed, does hereby make knownp admit,
publish , covenant and agree that the said -premises herein
described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants
1
which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all
purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors,
legal represenetatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to
wit:
1. That there shall be no further subdivision of the lots
shown as numbers 2 , 3 & 4 on said subdivision plan , in
perpetuity, except that declarants may divide lot A as a minor sub-division.
2. That, except as set forth in paragraph numbered 1 above,
Declarants reserve the right to impose additional covenants and
restrictions , and further reserve the right to modify, change
and/or annul any such additional covenants and restrictions that
may be imposed from time to time in the future .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Declarants have duly executed this
Declaration on the day and year first above written.
Jose ph—Ste—l-f-e r
STATE OF NEW YORK
SS . :
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
On the day of 198 , before me personally came
Joseph Steifer and Patricia Steifer , to me known to be the
individuals described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same.
(Notary Public)
2
SCHEDULE A
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying
and being at Mattituck, Town of Southold , County of Suffolk and
State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue, said
point being approximately 737 feet west of the intersection of
Cox Neck Road and Sound Avenue ; and from said point of beginning ,
RUNNING along lands now or formerly of Wirtz and lands now or
formerly of O'Connell , South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds
East, 1984. 85 feet;
THENCE along said lands now or formerly of O'Connell , South 21
degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East , 603. 59 feet;
THENCE along lands now or formerly of O'Connell the following
five (5) courses and distances:
(1) North 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West , 110.86 feet ;
(2) South 86 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West , 230. 31 feet;
(3) South 48 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds West , 190 .75 feet ;
(4) South 81 degrees 23 minutes 10 seconds West , 126. 72 feet;
(5) South 48 degrees 52 minutes 50 seconds West , 90 . 96 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East ,
700. 01 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE North 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West#
115. 50 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds West ,
740. 80 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 24 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West ,
496.97 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West,
324. 08 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds West,
141 . 15 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds Westp
172. 50 feet to the southerly line of Sound Avenue ;
RUNNING THENCE along said southerly line of Sound Avenue , North
77 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds East, 520.32 feet to the point
or place of BEGINNING.
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DESIGNATION:
DIST. 1000, SEC. 121 . 00, BLK. 04 .00 , LOT 008 . 000
SCHEDULE A 1984
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying
and being at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and
State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the southerly side of Sound Avenue, said
point being approximately 737 feet west of the intersection of
Cox Neck Road and Sound Avenue ; and from said point of beginning ,
RUNNING along lands now or formerly of Wirtz and lands now or
formerly of O'Connell , South 21 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds
East, 1984. 85 feet;
THENCE along said lands now or formerly of O'Connell , South 21
degrees 49 minutes 40 seconds East , 603. 59 feet;
THENCE along lands now or formerly of O'Connell the following
five (5) courses and distances:
(1) North 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West , 110.86 feet ;
(2) South 86 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West , 230. 31 feet;
(3) South 48 degrees 15 minutes 50 seconds West , 190.75 feet ;
(4) South 81 degrees 23 minutes 10 seconds West , 126. 72 feet;
(5) South 48 degrees 52 minutes 50 seconds West , 90 . 96 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE North 01 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East,
700. 01 feet ;
RUNNING THENCE North 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West ,
115. 50 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 20 degrees 53 minutes 50 seconds West,
740. 80 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 24 degrees 01 minutes 50 seconds West ,
496. 97 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 26 degrees 57 minutes 20 seconds West ,
324. 08 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 43 degrees 08 minutes 50 seconds West ,
141 .15 feet;
RUNNING THENCE North 21 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West ,
172. 50 feet to the southerly line of Sound Avenue;
RUNNING THENCE along said southerly line of Sound Avenue , North
77 degrees 34 minutes 38 seconds East , 520.32 feet to the point
or place of BEGINNING.
SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP DESIGNATION:
DIST. 1000, SEC. 121. 00, BLK. 04 . 00, LOT 008 .000
OT 2 2 1984
Tot Bennett Orlowskiy Jr., Chairman REPORT No. 400
Southold Town Planning Board
FROMs John W. Davis DATE: October 19, 1984
RE: SUNDOWN FARMS - MINOR SUBDIVISION AT MATT17ICK - LATEST DATE ON MAP 10/9/84
CONDITION OF EXISTING ROAD FROM SOUND AVE. Tr END OF PROPERTY
COMMENTS:
The road (noted as a 10 ft. traveled road) is somewhat in error. Attached is a copy
of the road widths down to about the last utility pole (2018 t ft.) from Sound Avenue.
This from Report 369 dated 6/7/84 for the Board of Appeals.
The above length has been stabilized with sand and gravel for depths of from 211 to 4".
The profile is acceptable but there are potholes and depressions throughout* Going
south except for the first 250 ft.t there is a wooded area on the left side and open
land on the right side. This section would probably not present problem for emergency
equipment.
1he remaining length (700 ft.t. ) is 8 ftA in width and in a wooded area throughout.
It has been stabilized with sand and small gravel. A few test holes indicated depths
of 311 . The profile is acceptable but there are a few irregularities. Most of this
length is below the adjacent ground level. In some areas the road sides slope up for
from 2 ft. to 4 ft. with trees near the top of the slopes. The 700 ft- section of
the road is passable as of the present time. Emergency equipment would have to turn
around via driveways.
if the alignment of the present road is to be accepted for access even though parts of
it are in property owned by others, it should be repaired and updated.
I would recomend the following:
1. Fill the potholes and depressions in the first 2000 ft.* and bring in additional
bankrun sand and gravel to provide a 611 depth. The v4dth for the first 250 ft.
would have to be 8 ft, X due to trees. The remaining 1750 ft.:t of 2000 could be
10 ft. in width or more.
2. The last 700 ft.1 should have the few high areas leveled and additional bankrun
brought in to also provide a 611 depth. Widening the present width would involve
grading and tree removal.
3. Place a compacted 211 top course of 3/411 stone blend on the bankrun for the full
length of the road.
C
J\ �\,�k
sl� y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
October 19, 1984
Mr. Robert W. Tasker
Town Attorney
425 Main Street
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: "SUNDOWN FARMS"
located at Mattituck
Dear Mr. Tasker:
Enclosed is a copy of covenants and restrictions
received in connection with the above referenced application.
Also enclosed is a copy of the correspondence from
the Planning Board requesting covenants and restrictions
on lot NO. 1. The minutes of the previous Planning Board
meeting have not been transcribed to date, however it was
as that meeting that the Board requested covenants and
restrictions on lots No. 2 ,3 , and 4 as to no further
subdivision in perpuity.
Would you please review the document and let our
Board know if they are in order.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours ,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. , CHAIRMAN
,S
.9UTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BCARD
By Diane M. Schultze SJ�4t`a��y'
enc.
40
PL-Ai'N1NG7BO'XJ1D
TOW :HOLD
SUFFOLK-.COUNTY
Southold, N.Y. 11971
TELEPHONE
Richard Ward 765-1938
JAMES WALL October 15 , 1984
BENNETT ORLOWSKI. Jr. , Chairman
GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, Jr.
William F. Mullen, Jr.
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, New York 11787
Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Section 1333 , Article XIII of the Suffolk County
Charter, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the
following proposed final plat to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
A,
(Map of) (Minor Subdivision) "sundown Parmc;11 App 3 i A-3,t-�J�&��Patric ia
Steifer'
Hamle
Tax Parcel Identifier No. Iona 121 4 8
Material Submitted:
Minor Subdivision - Class A(3 copies) X Class B (2 copies)
Major Subdivision (3 Copies)
Preliminary Map (1 copy) Topographic map (1 copy)
Darinage Plan (1 copy) Street Profiles (1 copy)
Grading Plan (I copy) Planning Board Res . (1 copy)
Other material (specify and give number of copies)
Waiver of Subdivision Requirements - See attached sheet X
Comments :
very truly yours,
-U-Tz�J
T� rh.4
WAIVER OF SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS
(Map of) (Minor Subdivision-) "Sundown Farms" applicantA-Patricia and
Joseph Steffer
Hamlet or Village Mattituck TownSouthold
The following items normally required as part of the subdivision applica-
tion have been waived.
Check, as required.
Prelim, nary Map X Topographic Map X Drainage Plan X
Street Profiles X Grading Plan X Landscape Plan X
Other (describe)
Reason:
1) Minor Subdivision
a) Not required by subdivision regulations
b) Subdivision of lot on an existing improved filed map
c) Other (describe)
2) Major Subdivision
a) No new drainage structures and no changes in existing drainage proposed
X
b) No new roads and no changes in existing roads proposed X
c) No major site clearing and grading proposed X
d) Other (describe)
O C7 1 91984tict. i� i �
4�6 ,C
77
o , _
Y5-t-_�mz�, 1,9
O 0
Pei
ch atcQ a a a, i 9.fV .
87
Ca czd �c�
J, et N
Ail cM
dor Sai `
U
i.
' _;UNDou�N i'AY�45
7�,• .�� • �oI VL /!V5{ GTZ_':�7 _.�I['.7-li i_, � ,n�Hd'f To :X7 .
dine
n
� � �UR�fEYLD So
-ry
�I' S'�"L G�X�T�Y i-FD(n1 �T31� L�•a�uW,.
�I
i'
IIS
I�I,
j
II
i
i!
I
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Hearing
NUTICE IS HEREBY GATEN
that pursuant to Section 276 of OCT 12 1984
the Town Law, public hearings
will be held by the Southold STATEOFNEWYORK
Town Planning Board at the
Town Hall,Main Road,Southold,
New York, in said town on the COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
22nd day of October,1984,on the
question of the following;
7:45 p,m. Approval of the
minor subdivision of Joseph and ANNA TVKKAq of Greenport, In
Patricia Steifer,subdivision to be said County, being duly sworn,says that he/she Is
known as ,sundown Farmj�' lo,
cated at Mattituck, Town of Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES,a Weekly
Southold,County of Suffolk,and Newspaper, published at Greenport, In the Town
State of New York,and bounded
and described as follows; of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of Now
BEGINNING at a point on the York, and that the Notice of which the annexed Is
southerly side of Sound Avenue
said point being approximately a printed copy, has been regularly published in
737 feet west of the intersection said Newspaper once each week for ONE
of Cox Neck Road and Sound Av-
enue; and from mid point Of'be- weeks successively, commencing on the 1 1
ginning,RUNNING along lands dayof OCTOBER 19
new or formerly of Wirtz and
lands now or formerly of O'Con-
,It, S. 21 degress 49' 20" E.
1984.85 feet; THENCE along
said lands now or formerly Of
O'Connell, S. 21 degrees 49'40"
E., 603.59 feet. THENCE along Principal Cl
mid lands now or formerly Of
O'Connell the following five
winses and distances: (1)N. 89 Sworn to before me this
degmes 41'00"W.110.86 feet,(2) dayof OCTOBER ja8 4
S. 86 degrees 56'00" W. 230.31 JUDITH A, CHIEN
feet;(3)S.48 degrees 15'50"W. NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York
190.75 feet; (4) S. 81 degrees No. 4796131.Suffolk County
23'10" W. 126.72 feet; (5) S. 48 Term EXPInn March 30 1
degrees 52'50" W. 90-96 feet;
RUNNING THENCE N. 01 de-
gross 1WO09'E.700.01 feet;RUN-
NING THENCE N. 23 degrees
oolool' W. 115.50 feet; RUN-
NING THENCE N. 20 degrees
53'50" W. 740.80 feet; RUN-
NING THENCE N. 24 degrees
0195o" W. 496.97 foot; RUN-
NING THENCE N. 26 degrees
5720" W. 324.08 feet; RUN-
NING THENCE N. 43 degrees
08150- West, 141.15 feet; RUN-
NING THENCE N. 21 degrees
30,00- W., 172.50 feet to the
motherly line of Sound Avenue;
RUNNING THENCE along said
southerly line ofSound Avenue,
North 77 degrees 34'38" R,
520.32 feet to the Point or Plus
of BEGINNING. Containing
27.5285 acres.
Any person desiring to be
heard on the above matter should
appear at the time and place
above specified.
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLD TOWN
PLANNING BOARD
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.
1TO11-4682 PRESIDENT
LEGAL NOTICE
Notice of Hearing
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV.
EN that pursuant to Section COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss:
276 of the Town Law, public STATE OF NEW YORK
hearings will be held by the
Southold Town Planning
Board at the Town Hall, Main
Road, Southold, New York in Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the
said town on the 22nd day of
October, 1984,on the question Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN,
of the following:
7:45 p.m. Approval of the a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County;
minor subdivision of Joseph and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy,
and Patricia Steifer, subdivi-
siontobe known as "Sundown has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watch-
Farms" located at Mattituck,
Town of Southold, County of man once each week for ........................................weeks
Suffolk,and State of New York the .............ZK r.le.............
and bounded and described as successively, commencing on
follows:
BEGINNING at a point on d 19-d*,*Y
the southerly side of Sound
Avenue said point being ap- L
proximately 737 feet west of
the intersection of Cox Neck
Road and Sound Avenue; and
from said point of beginning,
RUNNING along lands now or
formerly of Wirtz and lands C�
now or formerly of O'Connell, Sworn to before me this ................................ day of
S.210 49'20�E. 084.85 feet; ...........eq;:.4...................1 19...8Y
THENCE along said lands now ....... . ....
or formerly of O'Connell, S.
21- 49' 40" E., 603.59 feet.
THENCE along said lands now
or formerly of O'Connell the
following five courses and dis. .......................
................ .....
tances: (1)N. 890 41' 00" W. Notary Public
110.86 feet, (2) S. 860 56' 0011
W. 230.31 feet; (3) S. 480 15' BARBARA FORBES
501, W. 190-75 feet; (4) S. 81- Notary Public, State of Now York
23' 10" W. 126.72 feet; (S)S. No. 4BD6846
48* 52' 50" W. 90.% feet; Qualified in Suffolk County
RUNNING THENCE N. oio Commission Expires March 80, 19 All
15' 00" E. 700.01 feet; RUN.
NING THENCE N.230 00' 00"
W. 115.50 feet; RUNNING
THENCE N.- 200 SY 5011 w.
740.30 fed, RUNNING
THENCE N. 246 01' So" W.
496.97 feet; RUNNING
THENCE N,,260'ST 20" W
324.08 fed(v RUNNING
THENCE N. 4r,� 08, So-
West, 141.15 feet; RUNNING
'THENCE N. 216,30' 00" W.,
172.50 feet to the so�iherly
line of Sound Avenue; RUN-
NING THENCE along said
southerlY One OUSband Av.
enue, North,770 341 38" E.,
520.32 feet to the point or
place of BEGINNING. Con.
taining 27.5285 acres.
Any person desiring to be
heard on the above matter
should appear at the time and
place above specified.
BY ORDER OF THE
SOUTHOLDTOWN
PLANNING BOARD
BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.,
. CHAIRMAN
IT-10/11/84(54)
G C T 5 1984
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD. NEW YORK 11971
(516)765-1222
LEFFERTS P. EDSON October 5, 1984 (516)765-2500
RUDOLPH H. BRUER
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms
Mattituck, New York
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
in connection with the above application before the Board, we enclose
herewith the following: I
1. Our check in payment of the filing fee, in the sum of $100.00
2. Six copies of the subdivision sketch plan
3. One copy of the subdivision plan with the Suffolk County Health
Department's approval affixed thereto
4. One copy of proposed Covenants and Restrictions
5 one copy of metes and bounds description of the premises, (Sched. A)
6: Copy of proposed deed (Sched. D)
I understand that the inclusion of the above items will complete our
application. Thank you for your assistance with this matter.
Sincerely,
Rudolph R' Bruer
RHB/df
Encs.
46CHEDULE D
Sw�d�,d NY B T U F.,� �W-2�. —B.��. .�d S.k �ah
CONSULT YOUR LAWYER BEFORE SIGNIMS THIS INSTRUMENT-THIS INSTRUMENT SHOULD BE USED BY LAWYERS ONLY
THIS INDENTURE, made the day of nineteen hundred and
BETWEEN OCT
(Grantors name and address) IS84-
party of the first part,and
(Grantees name and address)
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of the first part, in consideration of ten dollars and other valuable consideration
paid by the party of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the heirs
or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate,
lying and being virrthe at Mattituck, Town of Southold, County of Suf f olk and State
of New York, more particularly bounded and described as follows:
District: (Metes and bounds description)
1000
Section:
121.00 Subject to Covenants and Restrictions of record.
Block:
04.00
Lot:
TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to any streets and
roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances
and all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO
HOLD the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of
the party of the second part forever.
AND the party of the first part covenants that the party of the first part has not done or suffered anything
whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that the party of
the first part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consid-
eration as a trust fund to be applied first for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply
the same first to the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for
any other purpose.
The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the party of the first part has duly executed this deed the (lay and year first above
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
(Signature of Grantor)
STATE OF NNW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS:
On th( day of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me
personalk came personally came
to in(- known tf, bt the individual described in and who to me known to be the individual described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that
executed the same executed the same.
STATE Of NEW YORK, COUNTY OF SS: STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF SS:
On the dav of 19 before me On the day of 19 before me
per�onall'v came personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with
�av that he resides at N;). whom I am personally acquainted, who, being by me duly
that 1w i� the sworn, did depose and say that he resides at No.
of I the corporation described that he*knows
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that h e to be the individual
knows the seal of Said corporation ; that the seal affixed described in and who executed the foregoing instrument;
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so i that he, said subscribing witness, was present and saw
affixed bv order of the boar! of directors of said corpora-
execute the same; and that he, said witness,
tion, and'that he signed h name thereto bv like order. at the same time subscribed h name as witness thereto,
Nargain anb ftir Web
WITH COVENANT AGAINST GRANTOR'S ACTS SECTION
I ITLE NO, BLOCK
LOT
TO COUNTY OR TOWN
R�rded at Requftt of
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
STANDARD FORM Of NEW YORK BOARD OF TITLE UNDERWRITERS Retum by Mail to
Distributed by
C=1CJ4L4G0 VIVEAC
XNffUnA1%TCZ COMIP&NY
Zip No.
0
0
Z
0
00 LZ'C'-L 1P
P D
T 0 f.S
Iry
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
September 25 , 1984
Mr. Rudolph Bruer
Attorney at Law
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
Dear Mr. Bruer:
At a regular meeting..of the Southold Town Planning Board on
Sept. 25 , 1984 the following action was taken.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board declare itself
lead agency with regard to the subdivision of "Sundown Farms"
located at Mattituck An initial determination of nonsignificance
has been made .
If you have any questions, please don' t hesitate to contact our
office .
Very truly yours ,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
e,
P
T D
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
September 25 , 1984
Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law
State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section
617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is
hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board as lead agency for
the action described below has determined that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
The minor subdivision of Sundown Farms is a 4 lot subdivision
on 27 .5 acres at Mattituck.
The project has been determined not to have a significant
effect on the environment for the following reasons:
An environmental assessment has been submitted which
indicated that no significant adverse effects to the
environment were likely to occur should the project
be implemented as planned.
Because there has been no correspondence from the DEC
in the allotted time it is deemed that they have no concerns
or comments regarding this matter.
The Suffolk County Department of Health Services has no
objection to our designation of lead agency status . Their
primary environmental concern pertaining to development is
that the applicant comply with the requirements of Article Vand VI
and relevant constructionstandards for water and sanitary sewage
disposal. The health department maintains jurisdiction over
final location of disposal and well systems and the applicant
should notundertake to construct any water supply or disposal
system without Health Department Approval .
The project will meet all the reqLrirements of the Code
of the Town of Southold Subdivision of Land Regulations.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Diane M. Schul-tze,,
Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, New York
11971
Copies mailed to the following;
Robert Flack, DEC Commissioner
NYS, DEC at Stony Brook
Suffolk County Department of Health Services
Suffolk County Planning Commission
Francis J. Murphy
Rudolhp Bruer, esq. for applicant
06 10!0�' I' I��7 1
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
Q
PETER F. COHALAN
SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DAVID HARRIS,M.D., M.P.H.
To: PtIPIA"Ay 60aleCl COMMISSIONER
Date
,47r--iON , MIR. 6�-I-T OOJ�WSk;J J12, RE: 6undowN
Dear A&I. 0oe(ocvse,' ! /000- /.a I - DC/-C>9
We are In receipt of your letter date I oncerning the
above referenced project. Lz���/' I�Yyc
1 . This Department has no objection to your designation of lead
agency status.
2. This Department is in agreement with your initial determination.
3. This Department does not agree with your initial determination,
See Comments I.
4. Insufficient information Is available for technical comments .
5. There is no record of an application to this Department.
0 A more accurate project locatiin is needed.
(Suffolk County Tax Map #)
6. This Department has received an application and it is:
Complete
0 Incomplete
[I Other:
7. it appears that the project can be served by:
Sewage DiSDOsa"ystem
[3 Sewer System and Treatment Works
0 Subsurface Sewage Disposal System(s)
Other:
COUNTY CENTER
RIVERHEAD.N.Y. t 1 901 548-3318
Water Supply Sys
C] A Public Water Supply System
C] Individual Water Sunply Syster(s)
0 Other:
8. Comments:
The Health Department' s primary environmental concern
pertaining to development is that the applicant comply with
the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code especially
Article V and VI , and relevant construction standards for
water supply and sanitary sewage disposal . These considerations
are to be reviewed completely at the time of application. Full
consideration in placement of water supply wells and disposal
systems is given to stlate and town wetland requirements. The
Health Department maintains jurisdiction over final location
of disposal and well systems and the applicant should not
undertake to construct any water supply or disposal system
without Health Department approval .
Other portions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code also
apply to commercial development such as Article XII, The
Lead Agency is requested to forward a copy of this form to
the applicant with Its findings.
Further comment may be provided upon completion of the
application review.
Name
Phone___,,��
OFFICE6F TOW' N A' ' I Inn
TTORNEY
ROBERT W.TASKER
TOWn Attorney TOWN OF, SOUTH&D
TELEPHONE
(516) 477-1400
425 MAIN ST.
GREENPORT, U., NEW YORK 11944
September 17, 1984
Mr. Bennett T. Orlowski, Jr.
Chairman, Southold Town Planning Board
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Sir:
You have sent me a copy of the above minor subdivision map of Joseph and
Patricia Steifer which is pending before Your board.
You have indicated and the map also shows that the traveled dirt road affording
access to the interior lots extends along the westerly boundary of the property
and in some instances is located on the property immediately to the west.
You have asked my opinion as to the legality of the right of way. As I have
previously advised the Planning Board, it is not the duty or the function of the
Planning Board to ascertain whether or not the applicant has the legal right to
use a right of way shown on his subdivision map It is presumed that the
applicant has the right to do what he is asking & Town Planning Board to
approve. In this instance, if the Planning Board is concerned as to the legal
right of the applicant to use that Portion of the right of way which encroaches
on the neighbor's property, it may impose a condition on the approval of the
subdivision map to the effect that it approves the access as indicated to the
extent that the applicant has the legal right to use the same for the purposes
of access to interior lots.
Yours very truly,
ROBERT W. TASKER
RWT:MY qj
ffv�
.3C3 ,�w.�J4�
SEP 17 1986a ,�j �� 9s
e> 7/
OYC/x/7.2-0 �2•,__-c�, �✓ �-t_J c2�`4��`"-�»-.J �+�a�
el/
�::),1 r rtr1
T D
V-P
S y
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
August 22, 1984
Mr- Robert W. Tasker
� Town ATtorney
425 main street
Greenport, NY 11944
Re: Sundown Farms
Dear Mr. Tasker:
Enclosed is a survey map for a minor subdivision of Sundown
Farms, the applicant is Joseph and Patricia Steifer. This
subdivision is presently pending before the Planning Board.
As you can see, the right-of-way, a traveled dirt road, runs
along the westerly property line and wanders inside and
outside the subdivision boundries .
The Planning Board questions the legality of the right-of-way
and would like to have your opinion on this matter. The
applicant has expressed concern with the possibility of
relocating the utility poles and the right-of-way, see
the enclosed correspondence regarding this . And, although
the tax map shows a right-of-way entirely outside the subdivision
boundries, the applicant is not certain he is entitled to
the use of this.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter, if you have
any questions regarding this, please contact our office.
Very truly yours,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR, CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
OAQTLO'3�, �L GC�kA,3
By Diane M. Schultze, Secretary
enC.
1K
ATTORNEYS AT LAW AUG %-)84
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
August 20, 1984 (516)765-1322
RTS P. EDSON tSIS)765-2500
LPH H. BRUER
Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services
Environmental Engineering Services
County Center
Riverhead, New York 11901
Re: Sundown Farms (Stiefer)
Mattituck, N.Y.
Dear Sirs:
In Connection with the above proposed minor subdivisiont we enclose herewith
the following:
1. Application for Approval of Realty Subdivisions and Developments
2. Realty Subdivision and Development Environmental Assessment Questionnaire
3. Three (3) map-, of the proposed subdivision
4. our check, in the stim of $18.00, in payment of your application fee
Please review the above submissions and advise us of your determination under
the provisions of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code.
Sincerely,
Rudolph H. Bruer
RHB/df
Encs.
cc: William H. Price, Jr.0 Esq.
Southold Town Planning Board
T7
Southold, N.Y. 11971
(516) 765-1938
August 17 , 1984
Environmental Analysis unit
DEC, Building 40, Room 219
SUNY
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Gentlemen:
Enclosed find a completed Short Environmental Assessment Form
and a copy of the map of the minor subdivision of Joseph and
Patricia Stiefer, Sundown Farms , located at Mattituck.
This project is unlisted and an initial determination of
non-significance has been made. We wish to coordinate this
action to confirm our initial determination.
May we have your views on this matter. Written comments
on this project will be received at this office until August 31 ,
1984- We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no
objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmenta
Quality Review Act-, and our ag"cY will assume the status of.1
lead agency.
Yours truly,
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN
SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD
By Dian.e M. Schultze, Secretar
enc.
cc: Department of Health Services
8 1984
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD AJOL
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 ' IS 1984
LEFFERTS P. EDSON
RUDOLPH H. BRUER (516)765-1222
(516)765-2SOD
July 18, 1984
Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision Application
Joseph and Patricia Stiefer
Dear Mr. Orlowski :
In connection with the above application, it is important to
the applicant that the right of way or access remain on the
southwesterly side of the premises--pretty much as it presently
exists.
The reason for this request is that the opposite side of the
property would entail the removal of numerous trees and it would
be a very hilly road. To change the existing access, that is
to widen it , it would require that numerous utility poles be
moved at a very high cost .
The character of the property or the property' s utilization
would not be substantially changed in that we are only asking for
four lots out of a total of 17-1/2 acres. The access road would
service only three lots, in that the lot fronting on County
Route 48 would have direct access.
We have discussed this matter With the Southold Town Planner
and indicated to him that we would be happy to covenant , that ,
in the event of any further subdivision whatsoever, the access
to the property may, infact , have to be improved.
If you would like further discussion with respect to the right
of way, please let me know, and I will be happy to talk to you
and the Board.
Y,
RHB/cas 4RXBr`uer �.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
LEFFERTS P. EDSON
RUDOLPH H. BRUER July 9, 1984 (SIG)76S-1222
(SIG)7155-2SOD
Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Minor Subdivision Application
Joseph and Patricia Stiefer
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Pursuant to the request of your office, we enclose herewith six (6)
additional prints of the preliminary map in connection with the
above application, making a total of twelve (12) prints submitted.
Sin erely,
Rudolphil. Bruer
RHB/df
Encs.
blJ Ponmos(fp Q•d C� ON �k�l�i�+��OrJ - TJOT �c�ST KAY /itAP
1
GU OVH(�A� t� s
jf(ce1s�o�1 -rc�W22
ScsA �
►, ,��-rimes aloes 7ZIAu 10 Qca�s
G (� 5 py L-c7rS
how - � � �� o
-2vl �t blas
�Yuv ()o4- — C_4-P— -
INST!"ICTIONS :
t3_j 6 �YT
i order to 0115vior the questions in this short EAF it is assu
thrit the P.-cpo,-cr %till usc.- currcritlX available information concerning t
project rind the lil:r.17 , I
odditional studic impac 'S Of ilic, action . It is not CxPcctecl that
IF any " I rc.,;C.C;rcll Or Other investigations will be undertaken
question Tios been onswered Yes the project may be
5ignificant and 0 co-,-vletcd Environmcntal Assessment
(c ) If all Form is necessary .
cluestions have been answered NO it is lil-el'
project is -lot g-nificant . y that this
(6 E7vTi-OnnL-n' al Assc:-.!,rlenil
P"*0.1'�.CL �_C.SU.Lt in a large physicol change
to ille. project site or Physically alter more
th-rill 10 acres of lunc!? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes x No
2 . Will thcrc be o mojor choti-10 to any uni"* *** '
-ur,u5uq1 land foirl found oil the site? . . . que or Yes X No
3 . I'lill Project alter or hCvC a large' efFcc' t0*n *�
existing body of woLcrl'
4. I'lill Project hava a po ' ' " " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YPS X No
tu-n-Lially largc impact
on groundwater quality? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes X, No
5 . ",'Ill Project significantly off-ert drainage
flow on adjacent siten? .
6- 1. Project affect any threatcned.or . . . . . . . . .Z__2 e s x No
endongercd plant or aninal :-,pocics? . . . . . �Y Cs X' NO
7. Will project result in a major adverse cHe�* t' *
I on air quality? . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .i ' '." :. Yes x No
8 - Vill prnject llcive 0 moiar cffcct on visu a
clMracier of ille COMmunity or scenic views or
Vinton known to - be imPoricilt to ille
11111 project CLIversely j,.lpoct any c, omnlun"Y? Yes X No
Si c 0 r
4 rUc 4
I Lure a f taric, Prehistoric or'
Paleontological mpO). ja1,.cc or Cilly site
da-siUncited cis a cl-iticcll environmental area
bya local agency? . . . . . . . . . . . . *. - -W .. . .,. .. . V*i Yes X No
10 . Will Project have a mo ; . .
aO!- effect on existing
or fuLurc recrc:otion,)2 o.pportunii ; cs? . . . . . . . . . Yes x No
11 - Will Project result ill nOjOr .1
traffic problems
Or COLInC a MO f
11: j`r cc' to existing
12 . onnpr)rtation sysicln5? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes X No
I"'Ill Project .rerlularly cause objectionnble
oclors, 1)noisc, glare, vibration, or electrical
di-- tur "'-'cc as a result Of the project ' s .
OPeration? . . .. . . . .*. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes x No
13 . Will Project 110ve any ir-pact On Public health �
l/ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YesX No
"" " I)F(-)jr-'Ct affect tht: existing community by
directly cOu._,i11c7 a D?0,1th in Permanent
POPtilation of more thon 5 percent Over a one
Ycor P`r'Od Or have 0 mojor ncgo' tivc effcct
on the Charoli-Ter or
nciohLorllood'� I the community or
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
there pul3lic - controversy ' cot-icernij-ig - the - - - --Yes X No
P",C)jcc t ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .—Ycs' x No
PREPAPEPIS S ,GNATU!�E
40 - 4—
JREPRESEIITIt�C; Joseph and Patricia Stiefer —0
——------- DATE 194844
DATE
46
/6
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MAIN ROAD
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
LEFFERTS F. EDSON
RUDOLPH H. BRUER (SIS)765-1222
(SI6)765-ZSDC
June 12, 1984
Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ,
Chairman
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Re : Application for Minor Subdivision
Dear Mr. Orlowski:
Enclosed please find an application for Mr. and Mrs. Joseph
Stiefer for the approval of a minor subdivision.
Sincerely,
RV-
Rudolph H. Bruer
Encs.
RHB/cas
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAT
To the Planning Board of the Town of Southold:
The undersigned applicant hereby applies for (tentative) (final) approval of a subdivision plat
in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law and the Rules and Regulations of the Southold Town
Planning Board, and represents and states as follows:
contract vendee
1. The applicant is the xmx=mfx%xamd of the land under application. (If the applicant is not the
owner of record of the land under application, the applicant shall state his interest in said
land under �pplicafion.)pursuant to contract of sale dated April 2, 1984, a copy
of which is annexed hereto. Sundown Farms
2. The name of the subdivision is to be . .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .... ............ . . ..... ...
. . . . ..... . ........ .... .. .... .. .. ...... .. .. ......... .. .... ........ . .. .. .. . ... ...... ........ .. ....
3. The entire land under application is described in Schedule "A" hereto annexed. (Copy of
deed suggested.)
4. The land is held by the applicant under deeds recorded in Suffolk County Clerk's office as
follows:
Lib 7903 89 21 , 1975
er . .... ...... ... . .... .. . .. Page . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . On . .. ...........
7974 575 January 2 , 1976
Liber . .. .. .... .... .. .. . . .. ... Page ... .. .. .. . . .. I. . . .. . . . On . .. .. ...... .... ......... .
Liber . .. .8.176.... .... ...... . Page . ... .4.819.. .. .. .. .. .. . On y 4.,..1.9 7.7 .
Liber . ... ... .... .. .... . Page . .. . ...75
.... .. .. .... . . . On 8 , 1978
.. .. ... ......
8566 550 January 10 , 1979
Liber ..... ....... . .... .... . . . Page .... . On .
Liber 8763 Page- on i:7� 'i 6
as devised under the Last Will and Testament of ... .. .. .. .. . . .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .........
oras distributee . .. . . .. .... .. .. .... ...... . ... . . . .. ...... .... .. .................... . .. .. .
.. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . ...... .... ........... . . .... . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .... .. .. . . .. ...... . ...... .........
5. The area of the land is . .. .. . acres.
the
6. All taxes which are liens on the land at the date hereof have been paid except ... ..
second half 1983/84 Southold town & school tax
. . . . . .... .. ...... . . .. .. .... .. ......... . ...... . ... .. I . .... ...... ...... .. .... .. ............ .. . .. .
7. The land is encumbered by ... .... .... . . ... . . .. . . .... . . .... .. ...... ...... . . ..... . . ...... .
mortgage (s) as follows:
(a) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .. .. . . .. . Page . .. .... . . .... .. .. ... in original amount
of $. . . . . .... .. .. .. . unpaid amount $. . . .. . . .. .. . . .. . held by . .. . . . . .... . ...... . ...... .
. . . .. .. .. . . .. .... .. .... .. . address . .. . . ... . . .. . . . . .. .. .. .... .. . . .. ...... .. . .... ...... .. .
(b) Mortgage recorded in Liber . .. .... . . .. . Page ... . . .. .... . . .. . . ... in original amount
of $. . . . . .... .. . . ... unpaid amount $. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . held by . .. . ... .... ... .. .. .... .. .. .
... . . . . ...... .. .... .. .. ... address . .. .. ... . . .. .. .. .... .. .... .. .... ....... .. ... . . . ..... . .
(c) Mortgage recorded in Liber . . . . . . . . . . . . Page . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . in original amount
of $. . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . unpaid amount $. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . held by . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .
8. There are no other encumbrances or liens against the land tmmpt . . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. The land ties in the following zoning use districts A.Re.s.iden.t.ial/.Agricu.ltur.a.1. .. . . .
. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. No part of the land lies under water whether tide water, stream, pond water or otherwise, ex-
cept . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .... .. . .. . . . . . ..... .. .
11. The applicant shall at his expense install all required public improvements.
12. The land,X74WX(does not) lie in a Water District or Water Supply District. Name of Dis-
trict, if within a District, is . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .
13. Water nntiw5-will be 4aiA by . .p3Fiyate wells
. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . I . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
Ftnd SN41-makw.
now exist
14. Electric lines and standards niii be-instaii el-b3r . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .
-fhr"r-
15. Gas mains will be installed by . . . . . .no. one. . . . . . . .I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . ... . . ... .. .. .
and (a) (no) charge will be made for installing said mains.
16. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Suffolk County Highway system, annex Schedule "B" hereto, to show same.
17. If streets shown on the plat are claimed by the applicant to be existing public streets in the
Town of Southold Highway system, annex Schedule "C" hereto to show same.
18. There are no existing buildings or structures on the land which are not located and shown
on the plat.
19. Where the plat shows proposed streets which are extensions of streets on adjoining sub-
division maps heretofore filed, there are no reserve strips at the end of the streets on said
existing maps at their conjunctions with the proposed streets.
20. In the course of these proceedings, the applicant will offer proof of title as required by Sec.
335 of the Real Property Law.
21. Submit a copy of proposed deed for lots showing all restrictions, covenants, etc. Annex
Schedule "D".
22. The applicant estimates that the cost of grading and required public improvements will he
$..—.9 as itemized in Schedule "E" hereto annexed and requests that the maturity of
the Performance Bond be fixed at . . . .. .. . . . . . years. The Performance Bond will be written
by a licensed surety company unless otherwise shown on Schedule "F".
. .. .... .. 19.84 JOSEPH & PAT.RICIA STIEF.ER. .... .. ... .... .
. . . .. .. .. . ..
DATE . . . .. .OV-1 . . . .. . . .. .. .. .... . . .. .. .. .. . . ...
Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
.. . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .... .. .. ........ .... ...... . . . .
(Address)
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . . . . . . . .. . . .�RgfRIX . .. .. . . ... ..I ss:
On the . . . .. ..3,2 th.. .. . day of . .. .. .. .awip. .. . . . . .. ... 19. K ., before me personally came
. ... .RPOP�P)q. H...I�AT4T-IP. ...... .. ..... . . to me knowwto be the individual described in and whr,
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowhdged that . . . . .be . . . . . . executed the same.
HELEN M.GATES
NSWV public,State of New York
No.47256M
1 in Suffolk Ce z& . . . . . .. . . ..... . . .
,'3nM9j.(
-"Km t. .. . . .A
March 30.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . ss:
On the . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . day . .. . . .. .. .. .. . of . .. . . . . . . .. 19. .. . . .. before me personally came
to me known, who being by me duly sworn did de-
pose and say that . .. .. .. . . ... resides at No. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
that . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . is the . . . .. . . .. .
. . . .. .. . . . . . . .. . of . .. .. . . .... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . ..... . . .. . .. . . .
the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that . .. .. .. . . .. . knows
the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed by order of the board of directors of said corpor-
ation, and that . .. . . . . . . .. . signed . . . .. .. . . .. .name thereto by like order.
. . .. .. . . .. . . . ... .. .. .. .... ...... .. . . .. .... . .... .
Notary Public
SCHEDULES
Sound Avenue a/k/a
County Route 48
Schedule C
Sound Avenue a/k/a
County Route 48
Southold Town Planning Board
Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Re: Application of Joseph & Patricia Stiefe
Premises at Sound Avenue, Mattituck
Gentlemen:
The following statements are offered for your consideration
in the review of the above-mentioned minor subdivision and its
referral to the Suffolk County Planning Commission:
(1) No grading, other than foundation excavation for a
residential building is proposed.
(2) No new roads are proposed and no changes will be made in
the grades of the existing roads.
(3) No new drainage structures or alteration of existing
structures are proposed.
Yoprs) truly,
OLASER FICHE FORM
SUBDIVISIONS
Pro4ect Type: Minor
Status: Final Approval
SCTM # : 1000 - 121 .-4-8
Promect Name: Sundown Farms
Location: Sound Avenue, Mattituck
Hamlet: Mattituck
Applicant Name: - Joseph & Patricia Stiefer
Owner Name: Joseph Stiefer
Zone 1 :
Approval Date: 11/5/1984
PLAT Signed Date:
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A date indicates that we have received the related information
Zone 2-.- Zone 3:
C and R's :
Homeowners Association
R and M Agreement: FSCANNIED
Address: Sound Avenue, Mattituck
County Filing Date:
VAY 1:7 2006]]
Management
SCAN Date:
THE WATER SUPPLY AND SEW46E DISPOSAL
SYSTEMS FOR THIS RESIDENCE WILL CONFORM
70 THE STANDARDS OF THE SUFFOLff COUNTY
DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES
PROP
SLD6
900
SA4 0
SEPTIC 0
7ANK 7-TIF
AE r AMP
L.P 300 30. FK
25' ROW
TYPICAL PLOT PLAN ON NE
0
rE s r 804 ES
40
gi o49
TOPSOIL TOPSOIL LOAM
I
541VOY LOAN
3 SANDY LOAM
4
SAND a GRAVE 4.8
'98
7 4.1 1, Q1
SAND
SAND
SAND 0
20 X
4
AC
15' 16 ' 14�5
lit V.
Go
Ut,
`4ti \J
1010 A HEIL I
10. ua, rH I
TH Z6.63' 211.00' ;�489.01 Q%idD,
rjo 68 N. 01015 ,00" vez z ED DIRr
/fow &0
000 0(
031, 5.50
g5 90 .6 4 .19 140-60
go,. To Uri f
ZI.49' UT 9 jE OE�1.5, 14 RECEIVED BY
"1, 2 MELD THIN PLANNING BOARD
14 OCT 5 1919A
DATE
C
0"iso
496�91 PR EL IMINA R Y
SUFFOLK COUN7Y DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
PLAN OF PROPOSED Hauppauge, Now York OCT 0 3 1984
0
MINOR SUBDIVISION This is to certify that the propoi.:1 cr;jr�,cm�nl, for waor supply
'61 50 and sewage disposol fo, sljt�powm FA(?Hs
Pool - 4 -
inthe (j) of — lots
SIANDOWN FARMS were approv�d un J.a L�D,c 1'�;Ia-
,-As— PO 00,
wg
AT MA T T1 TX1( C.....t is 1101C-D11 f;��j ir !!,.I 'ling of the map on which this
oil endorsument cipric at s i i ; .�- C)f P e uf the County Clerk in accardanco
pu 16 with provisions If 1�,o J-,,L�jc Jouth Law and the Suffolk County
so 2 rowN OFSOUrHOLD Sanitary Code,
g6 061 SUFFOL ff CO
,NY
Director of Environmental Health
0 NIF
S
A \4 ADD17JOAI HD-10-OR-84
TEYr bt7ES Y-IZ-64
i 30, 0
Uri ll 0 donack associates
PO
12 land surveyors and
NIF AVTF
TAKE-N FROM SuFFollr couNrr DPW AERIAL MAPS. consulting engineers
CONTOURS
NOS MONUMENT FOUND 313west main street
AREA 1, 199,143 - ' OVERHEAD WIRES. riverhead , new york 11901
275285 ACRES (516) 369-1717
MaY 4 , 1984 Job NS84 -476
1000-121-04-08 scale ; 1 100'