Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-18.-5-5
r MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBE • P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE ~O. tf SOUr, Southold, NY 11971 Chair `ice OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS * * Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR C42GEORGQ 54375 State Route 25 OSEPH L. OWNSESOLOM N ,O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND i2 Court �1 Southold, NY f` Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 11, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM# 1000-18..5-5 Zone: B, General Business Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolutions were adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, April 10, 2006: WHEREAS, the applicant and owner, Robert Ehrlich, proposes an amended site plan on a .28-acre parcel in the B District located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane, known as 22540 Main Road in Orient, SCTM# 1000-18-5-5; and WHEREAS, the proposed site plan involves an alteration of an existing 1,929 sq. ft. two- story single family dwelling into 572 sq. ft. sales area and 941 s.f. of storage and 416 sq. ft. of hall/stair/bath space with a stated proposed use as "Antiques —Auction Gallery— Arts and Crafts" with a stated proposed accessory "dry use of retail/storage" on a .28- acre parcel in the B Zone; and WHEREAS, on February 9, 2005, the agent, Patricia C. Moore, Esq., Attorney, submitted an initial formal site plan application for approval; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session, determining the site plan was incomplete and did not meet the minimum Town Code Requirements as submitted and authorized a letter to be sent to the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. indicating that the site plan application is on hold pending submission of revisions; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the revised site plan material submitted on April 12, 2005, determining the site plan documents were incomplete and did not meet the minimum Town Code Requirements as submitted and authorized a letter to be sent to the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. indicating that the site plan application is on hold pending submission of revisions, that the Planning Board requires submission of all site plan "distance dimensions, building total square foot, breakout use for retail and indicating the use of Ehrlich, Robert Page Two April 11, 2006 the balance of the building with clarification of the square foot per floor location uses of the entire building in current use and future use'; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the revised site plan material submitted on May 10, 2005, determining the site plan documents were incomplete and did not meet the minimum Town Code Requirements of section 100-213 Buffer Requirements for the B Zoning District as submitted and authorized a letter to be sent to the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. indicating that the site plan application is on hold pending submission of revisions; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the revised site plan material submitted on June 29 & July 5, 2005, determining the site plan was incomplete and did not meet the minimum Town Code Requirements as submitted and authorized a letter to be sent to the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. indicating that the site plan application will require submission of noted revisions; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 2005, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services reviewed and approved a "Dry Retail and Storage Use' under Permit Number C10-02- 0016 in accordance and subject to Board of Review determination dated May, 20, 2005 and bound by the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions dated July 13, 2005; and WHEREAS, on September 26, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session to review the revised site plan materials submitted on August 19 & 24, 2005 and the Planning Board voted to accept the application to start the site plan referral process, subject to compliance with the Town Code, including compliance with Town Code Section 100-213 for the zoning district B providing the maximum buffer with the residential uses abutting the site; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2005, the New York State Department of Transportation reviewed and approved the site plan under Permit Number 05-074P; and WHEREAS, on October 13, 2005, the applicant's agent responded by letter and the Southold Town Planning Board held a Work Session on October 13 to review the information in the letter, determining that additional site plan information is still required to be submitted as the site plan is not compliant with minimum Town Code Section 100- 213 for the zoning district B and authorized a letter to be sent to the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. indicating that the site plan must address this important issue; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 2005, the Orient Fire District responded with the recommendation that the Board of Fire Commissioners have no additional requirements for fire access and the Planning Board has accepted the Fire District's recommendation; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2006, the Suffolk County Department of Planning responded after review and determined that this matter is for "local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s)" and the Planning Board accepts this pursuant to 239L & M General Municipal Law; and Ehrlich. Robert Page Three April 11 2006 WHEREAS, on February 14, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.5 c (7), makes a determination that the proposed action is a Type II and not subject to review; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, has received affidavits that the applicant has complied with the notification provisions; and WHEREAS, on March '13, 2006, the Southold Town Planning Board held a public hearing on the application; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has received a copy of the recorded Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions dated February 23, 2006 for the future cross- over access to the property directly west of the subject property; further IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board denies the application for site plan approval dated February 2, 2006, floor plan dated February 3, 2006, and truck turn-around layout plan dated February 3, 2006 prepared and certified by Michael Mapes, Professional Engineer for the following reasons: 1) Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-213 "Transition buffer area", the Planning Board, in its discretion, determines that a 25' minimum buffer is necessary to protect the abutting residential properties due to the uniqueness of the subject property, its close proximity to the surrounding properties and the expected deleterious effects of retail activities on this rural village area. This required minimum buffer area is not depicted on the proposed site plan dated February 2, 2006, nor does the buffer proposed by the applicant satisfy these concerns. Because of the unique shape of the affected parcels, the neighboring property to the south shares 3 property lines with the subject parcel, with structures .5' from the property line. The property to the east is configured such that it conjoins with the subject parcel, sharing boundaries on two (2) contiguous sides, with structures within approximately 20' of the subject property. It is the Planning Board's determination that the proposed double row of 5'-6' Leyland Cypress Hedge will not "provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to the neighboring properties" as required by Town Code Section 100-213. 2) Pursuant to Town Code Section 100-251, the Planning Board further finds that the proposed site plan change of existing use and location of parking areas will not "Protect the established character and value of the adjoining properties, both public and private, and of the neighborhood in which they are located" as required by Section 100-251 B. 3) The agent, for the applicant, through testimony in the public hearing on March 13, 2006, has admitted that the proposed use is in actuality a "gift shop" dedicated to typical retail sales, as opposed to the "Antiques, Auction Gallery, Arts & Crafts and accessory retail/storage" use as listed on the site plan application. As per Town Code 100-191, parking calculations for a gift shop would be based on the retail shop requirements which calls for, "at least 1 parking space per 200 feet of gross floor area" in "order to minimize traffic congestion, air pollution and the risk of motor vehicle and pedestrian accidents r Ehrlich. Robert Page Four • April 11 2006 and to address aesthetic considerations" as per Town Code 100-190, Purpose. The gross floor area, as indicated within this proposed site plan application, requires a minimum of 10 parking spaces, double the 5 proposed spaces as depicted on the applicant's plan dated February 2, 2006. As per the Town Code, one copy each will be distributed to the Building Department and Town Engineer/ Highway Department. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson enc. cc: Building Department Engineering Inspector Town Attorney MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �OF SO(/ly�lo Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR G C 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. 50LOMON "``�O (cor.Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND Ol�,C0U111 �v Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 14, 2006 Frank A. Isler, Esq. P.O. Box 389 456 Griffing Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone: B, General Business Dear Mr. Isler: Enclosed please find the Planning Board's project file regarding the above- referenced project, as requested. We would appreciate it if you would return the file to our office in its original state when you are finished with it. If I can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call me. Very truly your /Bru o e Sr. Site Plan Reviewer BS:ck encl. cc: Patricia Finnegan, Esq., Southold Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Asst. Southold Town Attorney Jerilyn Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson Mark Terry, Acting Planning Department Head MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE �OF SO(/TyOlo Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON p (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �Olycoulm,N�'� Southold, NY G` Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 18, 2006 Frank A. Isler, Esq. P.O. Box 389 456 Grilling Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone: B, General Business Dear Mr. Isler: Enclosed please find a copy of e-mail regarding the above-referenced file, as requested. If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call us. Very truly yours,/ Ca7'4 - / �0 -� Carol Kalin Secretarial Assistant cc: Patricia Finnegan, Esq., Southold Town Attorney MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE so Southold, NY 11971 Chair OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS # Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR A Q 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON i.c- �O (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) ' JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND �yCOuM'�AQ Southold, NY I'111 �•`- Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 2006 Mr. William Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: FOIL Request for proposed Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Moore: The Planning Department is in receipt of the Application For Public Records (Freedom of Information Form) submitted to the Town Clerk and forwarded to the Planning Department on April 24, 2006 and again on May 12, 2006. As always, the file and all documents available under the FOIL request are available for review in the Planning Department. Please note, however, we are advised by counsel that many of the types of documents you request consist of communications between or among agency officials, and thus are not discoverable under the exception to disclosure appearing at §87(2)(g). Any such documents that don't qualify for this exception, e.g., final agency decisions, statistical tabulations or direct instructions to staff, will be made available in the public file. Sincerel j M Terry cling Depa ent He Cc Patricia Finnegan, Town Attorney Kieran Corcoran, Assistant Town Attorney Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Amy Ford, Senior Planner MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE so Southold, NY 11971 Chair V` OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L.EDWARDS * Town Hall Annex MARTIN H.SIDOR G 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D.SOLOMON �, p (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L.TOWNSEND ��yCOW, � Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 2006 Frank A. Isler, Esq. P.O. Box 389 456 Griffing Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone: B, General Business Dear Mr. Isler: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced file, as requested. If we can be of further assistance, please call us again. Very truly yours, �ace,)-� ox'z Carol Kalin Secretarial Assistant cc: Patricia Finnegan, Esq., Southold Town Attorney SIV PLAN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: p 4 e ft ZONEI: 18 ZONE2: ZONE3:_ LOCATION: 5 O M A I N FED HAMLET: CC) E : tiJ PR JECT USE: I SCTM# 1000- OWNER NAME: S G rA-x-, APPLICANT NAME: TEL#(_ AGENT NAME: a ituc. port s TEL#L_) 5LLI3Q t PROJECT DESCRIPTION c / THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR A'Z ON ,20 ACRES PARCEL IN THE_&-ZONE LOCATED AT IN C j- SCTM#1000- (SEE ABOVE). DATE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE:S/P REQUIRED! tOR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED Y O I—/—_ PRE-SUBMISSION WRITTEN REQUEST: _/ I PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE(WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: n / /_ PRE-WORK SESSION: l�/p APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE:,L /__2 /_, APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: PAYMENT RECEIVED: ¢ AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ 7_ o FEE AMOUNT:($300.X =$ -JQQ +($.05 X SF=$ 32- =$ NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION(WITIEN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT),PB'ACCEPTE/d R N f APPLICANT ADVISED OF NECESSARY REVISIONS (WITHIN 30 DAYS OrF REVIEW)$ n • ® O,a3 / l REVISED S MISSION RECEIVED: / Ol '« s r�dis��5, y l l NOTES: OS- �.ri tJ.rKA4,0 4s0 pow 4 '� r .(� REFERRED AGENCIES:(WITH MAPS=W/P) STZBA�Z,STBD✓STCfB✓,1H✓,STBT_,STE,/�SCDHS✓,NYSDEC_USACORPS SDOT�,SCWA SCPDCDPW_ RESPONSES NOTES 5' r LEAD AGENCY: TOSPB:_,OTHER:_REVIEW:PARTI_,PART]_PART 3J SHORT EAFJ TANG /— NOTES: ACTION TYPE:COORDINATED:— UNCOORDINATED:— (TYPE1: TYPE2:_UNLISTED:� REFERRED TO:ST2BA_,ST8D_,STCRB_,JH_,STBT_,STE_,SCDHS_,NYSDEC_,USACORPS_,NYSDOT_,SCWA_,SCPD_SCDPN_ SE RA DE ATION:NE DEC Y OR N, —/—i— m / APPROVALS REOUIR REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION S.r 16 ,-i FIRE COMMISSIONERS: TOWN ENGINEER APPROVAL: 2¢5a S DEROF TRANSPORTATION:DOT ,DPW SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING /c.. - SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT OF HEALTH:PERMIT#: - / r� A OPTIONAL APPROVALS: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:APPEAL#: BOARD OF TRUSTEE'S: NYS DEC WETLANDS/TIDAUSPDES / / LIN /L VALL L'✓P / d E C+iih PLANNIN0MRD DECISIONS: CONDITIONAL FINAL:—/—/—, DENIED: APPROVED: FINAL: ITOTES ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: —/—/— FIELD INSPECTION FOR CIO: —/—I— DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / / TOWN ENG GENERAL NOTES: r 8/25/2004/fir L(.i„/ - /!'CI.�s4r�. 1-�di...r— ..�✓� 4 Z, G � a-*r./ T .> . ,� //�Sar s/�2k � I5 y 6 I f C3 7 r TOWN* SOUTHOLD PLANNINIkOARD SITE PLAN APPLICATION SECTION A: Site Plan Name and Location Application Date: oZ / �l / Zoos Site Plan Name: _ Robert E bri t to _ 2006 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000- Other SCTM#s: Street Address: cPa 5-L4 Main in Roof Hamlet: o'l crtt Distance to nearest intersection: C/o V, 1 IGGC Lctilift- Type of Site Plan: 14 New Amended Residential If Amended, last approval date: SECTION B: Owners/Agent Contact Information Please list name, mailifn address, and hone number or the eo le below: M Property Owner n��\ob 2r t- L Street__Jo O Ro 51 V n A-,. - city. Se C,L C State N y Zip—J i S -7�] Home Telephone Other Applicant $ a me Street City State Zip Home Telephone Other Applicant's Agent or Representative: Contact Person(s)* ?a.kcccw C - ✓YlOo✓`- �3y Street E 1D'2—D (Y1 G i n Q pa j City Scx Qk d State f.-1-/ _Zip (l q Office Telephone &31- 7(oS W 3 3 0 Other P�r)4 : -7 - y y 3 *Unless otherwise requested, correspondence will be sent only to the contact person noted here. Page I of 2 10/05/05 SECTION C: Site Data . • Proposed construction type: __New _Modification of Existing Structure _Agricultural Change of use A.-- :.t Property total acreage or square footage: . 28 ac./sq. ft. Site Plan build-out acreage or square footage: 3 Z'7 a.Aq• ft. '� �`~+'~`9 A�,Qo l I j ��,��) Is there an existing or proposed Sale of Development Rights on the property? Yes_No If yes, explain: Property Zoning District(s): _ bus'.ne e,5 Building Department Notice of Disapproval Date: / l o/ PS- Is an application to the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals required? Yes No x If yes, have you submitted an application to the ZBA? Yes No V If yes, attach a copy of the application packet. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building will have which use. If more then one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area per use. List all existing property uses:_ V } List all proposed property uses:— A �n`haUPS -Other accessory uses: n/ Se 0 r CMG ff -1'�fpj 6t1'1n✓I91t3L Existing lot coverage: % Proposed lot coverage: 1 % 9lS /MFfoo/fSr17 2M {yboeIF4107Affick- -7v2 SfR' ross floor area of existing structures).>9a9 _sq. ft. Gross floor area of proposed structure(s) Y` X USes S �E�cd ry t, Arnim 6 7o'Z ss, �r Parking Space Data: 1 p4_,e 2.s'b s.f r— o� Sojcs # of existing spaces:_ # of proposed spaces: S Loading Berth: Yes No )c �v �W 1-aa-0,3 w�A bvFf��Aft"ms LCZaOti/� la 9h // -7-03 Landscaping Details: Existing landscape coverage: JT 0 % Proposed landscape coverage: SO % Waterfront Data: Is this property within 500"of a wetland area? Yes No-If yes explain: I, the undersigned, certify that b�o above information is true. Signature of Preparer1 Date:_ 6�9 to/os/os Page 2 of 2 APPLICANTS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOW being duly sworn, deposes and says thaMe resides at in the State of New York, and that he Is the_ow�f a above property, or that he Is the of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tide to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly flied plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the plans submitt owner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) SWqOfaY this ' 290 �r end NM M QysalkE al&AfatlCOMMr �/n/I C/ CanwAwb^EpM.MJY 1 6IZ20 Appendix A L -n State Environmental Qual ty Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine,in an orderly,mann¢r,whether a project or action m)y be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to�answer. Frequently,there are-especis of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determinii significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis.`ln addition, many who have knowledge In one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature,yet flexible enough to allow introduction of Information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By Identifying basic project data,it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible Impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it Is a potentially-large impact. The form also Identifies whether an Impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any Impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large,then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑Part 1 1:1Part 2 Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate),and any other supporting information,and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment,therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment,therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. •A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional Information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not Involve new studies, research or investigation. If Information requiring such additional work Is unavailable,so indicate and specify each Instance. Name of Actions Location of Action(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor Address olq S y /yam f� RC7B� City/PO nn State Zip Code Business Telephone lS�� _ �4.5� 416-/VS Name of Owner(if different) Address City/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Re t,5X o5L 7 /I �- nn 41bG CS - Avc4ron 6ulle-r� _ �fs u'y7f5 /�-P i Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban ❑Industrial 0 Commercial ®Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) ®Forest LZ%J u{ture 11 Other 2. Total acreage of project area: -�28 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres apes Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres apes Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) acres apes Water Surface Area acres acres / Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) r' � act .1 yf� //_ eL acres Iyk Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 77 !y8 � / Y8 acr s acr Other (Indicate type) in $b acres apes 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained ZjM% of site ®Moderately well drained_% of site. ®Poorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System?__acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes 1Z No a.. What is depth to bedrock_ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: M0-10% 100 % ®10- 15%_% ® 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? Yes PC" No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ®Yes 0No 8. What is the depth of the water table? I I r (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 51Yes EI No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? � Yes IN No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project'slte contain any species of plant or animal life that is Identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes Mo According to: /low Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Oyes No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by bis community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes [91No If yes, explain: 14, Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes Do i, 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: IV/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ^ // b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes ®No a. If YES,does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 ®Yes toNo 19. Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes Q9No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes �No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: acres. -�p i b. Project acreage to be developed: 'Z8 acres initially; ' LO acres ultimately. W 2 I n 4�`yg Vy l c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ' acres. ( I d. Length of project, in miles: N AQ (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. O % t4 tb� f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing —7 proposed S hj g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 14 ' (upon/Dmpletion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially _ Ultimately _ 7 i I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: height; 91!;— width; length. i p j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? �S �9aY gs 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? _tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes ®No KA a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes '®No - c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? YesLCJ No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? � acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest lover '100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes 55 No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: s oghs, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d, Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 0 Yes ❑ No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes IZI No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction Z ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project C 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain: i 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ElNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount �P/'i�1/Gttt. SRC-tJ -� b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged I /OnC. 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes �No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes®No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ®Yes ®No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? S tons b. If yes, will an existin solid waste facility be used? M Yes El No C. If yes, give name t O/� �yX i location 0I'ZA+O1-c_c.c- d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? r7yes IN No Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 44� tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 19. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ®Yes E]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes ®No 21.-Will project result in an increase in energy use? E]Yes ® No i If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day_,S7— gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? E]Yes ® No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 28. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ®Yes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ❑ No City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ® No ®Yes ❑ No Dry "g� vrd City, County Health Department 7 Other Local Agencies ®Yes ® No Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes ❑ No State Agencies ® Sty Yes NO os -o�� P io as Federal Agencies ®Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ® No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment ❑ Zoning variance ❑ New/revision of master plan ❑ Subdivision .Site plan ®Special use permit ®Resource management plan ❑ Other Page 8 of 21 • 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? (U 05tiv)t'S5 /Oo - /00 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? yid" �'r�VA too 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 6. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 100 ( (:Do U_A-c-a 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Yes No b- ..r,Q. it C_Q.O�ac*c� 141-4.'o-f. 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/4 mile radius ofproposed action? J U�r✓+1 �^^ �u r P ox a to t ' rc�ry CCU" r etas c�mc� wVtok sn l o_ c-c9 yvt rY --t-c- " c kAJP=-ro Me-n PZ V I CS V\-e J a cots m ekoSa ��o ,v\ n u m" --7 yy�n�Qa , d?a u r,Q o cd ac�ct cewtt P h ua C-n� — C a wd t� dam ? a-wcl lv , Say ` 9 9c,hf ec4 ro rx , = 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a Y. mile? 1 Yes ©No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? 0 4 a. Whit is the minimum lot size proposed? �1 Page 9 of 21 1 Yu � � • r. 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ® Yes No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ❑Yes P No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes,®No a. If yes, Is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be�eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss Such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification �f I certify that the information provided above Is true to the best of my knowledge. 7 � Applicant/Sponsor Name /� t'$ Date 1 Z" le—b j P✓6vtou4Pt 4 Signature �L-7C;t— — OS-5 Title If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form,Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on Information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or Investigation. If Information requiring such additional work Is unavailable,so indicate and specify each Instance. Name of Action RUhP„� &z e/i LA Location of Action(include Street Address,Municipality and County) - Name of Applicant/Sponsor _ 4Qb_e,n fj� Address d 6VQ 074,,) City/PO 0"j ram/ Stated_Zip Code Business Telephone (�/ _ � ..C'(o C/6-YS Name of Owner(if different) Address city/PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: Reuse o/ Z-XI sb- /' h uao" ?n- /1 4 b7V4L 5 - o�7/C r o n v,� ��e-r - 1`5 �--o"YA C/ YiTGc�l 13al" -/ i I ` / 000 --- '� JAN 2 4 2006 Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. If not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use:❑Urban Industrial IVIII®Commercial ®Residential (suburban) Rural (non-farm) ®Forest ®Agriculture 11 Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 126 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow orBrushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,26 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area � acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) a 1 /* ' c / Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Z( ly8 ) iy8 t nacr s acreE Other (Indicate typal l.-Q:>•t�'S Bt./,_�/t7c5Z7 acres e� acres 3. What is predominant soil typels) on project site? ` a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained % of site F-1 Moderately well drained_% of site. ElPoorly drained _% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System?--acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ® Yes ® No a. What is depth to bedrock_ fin feet) 6. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: N0-10% 100 % ®10- 15%_% ® 15% or greater_% 6. Is project substantially-contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? IX 1 Yes = No �fiUt/7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ®Yes e � 8. What is the depth of the water table? I I r (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ElYes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes W No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project'site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes JZNo According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? Oyes No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by ti is community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes MNo If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site iiyclude scenic views known to be important to the community? ®Yes Do 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: wIA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? Yes ®No a. If YES,does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ®No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ®Yes S1No 19, Is the site located in or substantial) contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes ally 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ®Yes M]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: O acres. 1 ' b. Project acreage to be developed: '28 acres initially; ' acres ultimately. W r 2. Irt IaYJ� f�v1'Ieq c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ' acres. ! J d. Length of project, in miles: N ,C� (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. o % vY('f{41%1 t4Ib Wti{nowF bv{f<✓, f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed 5 _0�,.�,,.�. �� k� l � �a lira n 5 sl ru r g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: 14 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially _. Ultimately _ i I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 31 height; width; length. ,fram� i pp I. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 7 xA'yTt�Va g,S ��/i�/q�� Z4nG 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? .tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed ®Yes ®No ®N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? El Yes FK]No ` c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Oyes El No 4. How many acres of vegetation trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? __© _acres. Zuad5Ceyprnc1 Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest lover 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? 13 Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction. moghs, (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: W/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: month year, lincluding demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 11 Yes ® No S. Will blasting occur during construction? ®Yes I No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction Z ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ©No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount 41N/a,tc 11�/ b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged �O/tG 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ©Yes ® No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ®Yes®No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Yes ®No 16, Will the project generate solid waste? W Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? r tons b. If yes, will an exi sting-solid waste facility be used? 129 Yes 1:1 No C. If yes, give name e% &Ilt, ; location 6,;Ae—Aorut �- -Ti d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes ® No Page 6 of 21 r e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ®Yes ®No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 40 tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Oyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dayl? OYes ®No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ®Yes ®No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes ® No i If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity_ gallons/minute. 23, Total anticipated water usage per day y5 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ri Yes ® No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ®No City, Town, Village Planning Board ®Yes ® No City, Town Zoning Board E]Yes ® No ®Yes El wry /1`/c%.P�Si�Ya9� v[al City, County Health Department —T/ Cdo-p2-oo� 6 9 zo o,s-- Other Local Agencies 1:1 Yes rl No Other Regional A��encies Yes ® No State Agencies ®Yes ® No 5ta — Federal Agencies ®Yes ©No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes © No If Yes, indicate decision required: Zoning amendment Zoning variance ® Newlrevision of master plan ® Subdivision .Site plan ® Special use permit ®Resource management plan ® Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? U5uhts'5 ldO - /00 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? C�> ydr Cof� sue, is Tkl'a -' 4,�* too-- too 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 1A 6. What Is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? ><O o — f o a —�-� 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ®Yes ❑No D t fr e2olmew F rn eA.a wc�c to u4 �.,�v chi y s h 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a A mile radius of/proposed action? .� ! e1z�Q � wNok s r t.6-yV1rY�f�t-Gt,c�Q 4',t.Gn-� L t CII Me , o `7 fnbizrribfi� C )- 5�Cr 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a % mile? MYes © No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? A(�4 a, What is th^. minimum lot size proposed? / �� Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑ Yes No 1 1. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? ®Yes q Nc a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Yes ❑ No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Yes,®No a. If yes, is the existing //road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. ®Yes No D. Informational Details i Attach any additional information as may ba�eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse Impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss ;uch impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. `,. UO QGZCLcs, Applicant/Sponsor Name /`� �5 Date CQ✓�vr evbr> Gd Signature Title abze y If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 � uR T n of,Southold L WRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM A. INSTRUCTIONS - 2006 I. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete tb}s-CCAF f r proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review La, s assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a-Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town) 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, each answer must be explained in detail listing both suonortine and non sunaortina facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# DOO -_ _ -- PROJECT NAME Ch r✓ ,LA 5e� P1a-r, The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Board yN Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees r 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) (c) Permit, approval, license,certification: Nature and extent of action: c dC fi t'" /Pare 1 e-x r%"J A L4A/C(i rl xP Lc oL Cept?6es -Gitic�j4sn g�z/laiu� _ aA Z� lif C 4 ��S Location of action: fo5�/ Site acreage: . 2- Present land use: Va&tn-f 7<ifla n JJ Present zoning classification: 3 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant:_ , CS A/;� (b) Mailing address: elegy 5207-0 /ytam f��� o.,s a/a/ /�^� / /9 7 (c) Telephone number: Area Code ( (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No '—N" If yes, which state or federal agency? C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ❑ No Not Applicable � +9 � o Drs/S2ct 0• Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria IN Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable 07 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria Yes 11 No D Not AApplicable ' /r✓t a Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life„ structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria Yes E] No V"Rr Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ® Yes 0 No E]Not Applicable Or �x12' 61 � LLQ, Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. Yes [] No$ Not Applicable 3� Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes 11 No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No DppNot Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes❑ No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's Or-dependent uses and promote si0of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable etc D. Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable ems).-is-�4 74/O� Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ No)"e"24 Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes ❑ NoX Not Applicable PREPARED IKTITLE 2JZn_�DATE /-6 "0 fo Amended on 811105 ucenseNd.: Jvc vL- Address: (p �f35 J' try+N ST, /z-WF y&"E 4D Telephone: c3 (o y (pa i ' it 1'ti t 1 ._J Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPUCAN S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK c yy / j�rruuA C- Mood 1106t;W- � Y4I?U Gff• being duly sworn, deposes and says thatle resides at a—i lm v S e/d of In the State of New York, and that he is the 6wner of the above property, or that he is the &U n-c of the (Title) (specify whether Partnership or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been dearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be installed In strict accordance with the plans submi Sign wner) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) SWoLn to me this day of 4; �9 , 4g s^ (Nottrly Pu c) MARGARET C. RUTKOWSIO Notary public,State of New yo1111 No. 4982528 OualiBed In Suffolk Courrty CW"immion Who iww 3.Za oZ :■� JRN 10 '65 10 22RM SOUJ�,{OLD BUILDING 631 765 9502 • P, 1 ■r rORNI NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL, 10: Robert Erlich DATE: January 10, 2005 17'Main Avenue lf ' Sea Cliff, NY 11579 Ptease take notice that your application dated December. 29. 2005 Far pCiMitto open a retail shop in an.existiindwelii� at Location of property: 22540 Main oad r County Tax Map No, .1000 - Section 1,8 Blod<5 Lot 5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on thr„ following grounds: Mum conversion recdtires s'te 1 n approval frotn the Southold Town Planning Board, A,uthcrired Sigfthfaze � Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above z;.%:eu application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department, CC: file, Planning Board f PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the envirogment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable,so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION (zo efaer LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Munlolpallly and County) a25y M,r.N ,earn BUSINESS TELEPHONE ... NAME OF APPLICANUSPONSOR (SIGI CeSb• ysL1S_ . ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE clTrmo BUSINESS TELEPHONE NAME OF OWNER of differenU ( ) ADDRESS STATE ZIP CODE - GTYIPO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Rwse of e.,r�Ja/,irLS b.c.t ldfn {� ��•@a t P CAAA Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed 2nd undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑llrban ❑Industrial *ommercial OResidential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-far, ❑Forest OAgriculture OOther 2. Total acreage of project area: / IE acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural)-agricultural) CJ acres — 0 acres —--- acres Forested c7 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) O acres -- acres 40 acres acres Water Surface Area --- Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres -- — acres acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces •25 •Z.�--- acres acres Other (Indicate typel 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? % of site a. Soil drainage: 'SWell drained 0 % of site ❑Moderately well drained ❑Poorly drained - % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N Land Classification System? acres. (Seel NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prof ct lte? OYes ONO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ❑0-10% % 010-15% 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Kyes ❑No bp.46AIW� PFO/tM/L+S — A05% . raj SS . 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Ves ❑No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) NA _9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? 2 Yes lWo t 1% 6 /c/9 0e Uu 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? OYes )CNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes *o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)- Dyes YkNo Describe 13. Is the project si a presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? OYes %0 If yes, explain 14. Does the present Ite include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes No AA 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 1f�.9 b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? 9Yes ❑No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Dyes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes *0 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguo to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? OYes JBNo ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes �dNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project(fill In dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor O acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. . O d. Length of project, in miles: rJ & (If appropriate) O e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed O %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing _ 7 proposed -7 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially —7J—/_ZiW Ultimately �L._ I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure--.�ieighC 642 r1 r� width: y_ J. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy Is? t. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? /J tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO */A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ❑No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? acres. 5. Will any mat ur forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Oyes Wo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 9"410 months, (including demolition). _ 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated �'�(number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes )4No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction .3 after project is complete 3 % Number of jobs eliminated by this project O 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ZWo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes —,RfNo -- -- - a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? VIYes ONO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Dyes �Io 16. Will the project generate solid waste? 19Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons.440'�l G'.A-Q' b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be us ? . - PYes ONO �+ C. If yes,.give name e5err/yei Id2�alr L "^'^�'"' : location Cuk" ' d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes ONO e. If Yes, explain _ 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes *0 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes 'lo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Oyes )GIO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes XV0 21. Will project result in an in ease in energyse? Oyes WNO If yes , indicate types) �K/ YAa,,.- 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity. Goo gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 4Dpo . gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Oyes P(No If Yes, explain 4 • 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board OYes t6No City, Town, Village Planning Board _ -Eyes ONo lJt-{C -L-'L' City, Town Zoning Board OYes l%No City, County Health Department OYes RNo 2Yls Other Local Agencies Oyes ❑No Other Regional Agencies Dyes ONo State Agencies ❑Yes ONo Federal Agencies Byes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Oes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment ❑zoning variance Ospecial use permit ❑subdivision site plan ❑new/revision of masher plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 101a5/nm"2 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4Z S ,Gj uZG4 4. Mhat is the proposed zoning of the site? S. What is the maximum potential.development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 95 `PM4't (- - Alas/- . - (s.-fzt� 1 1 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? )(Yes ONo 7. What are the predominant: landdp use(s) and zoning classifications within aA1/ mile radius of proposed action? _ Rl.1�7Er�,f tGl�! � ��e7y11MLt.Ct4X 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? Vres ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land; how many lots are proposed? of,/fA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s)for the formation of sewer or water districts? OYes )RHO 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? OYes KNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Oyes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? OYes &o a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the a_4ditlonal traffic? OYes ONo 4f tr,P At 'greoAGr -Jill r�,t faa�P tree �f as D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spons 9 u A G O Date r2',6' 615 Signature A�, Title If the action Is In the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS AND WATER SUPPLY NARRATIVE REQUEST Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. 1. Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, sanitary flow,water use. 2. Idica a thQe souurrcceF nfwater supply, neafes t public water main, nearest public well field, and adjacent private wells(if known). NIA 3. If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. N/A' 4. If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. lewns&i5 a-Lap 5. Indicate proposed water conservation measures that will mitigate for unavoidable adverse impacts (If any). Conservation measures should include,but not be limited to: a. The use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping. b. The preservation of existing native vegetative buffers. c. The conservation of existing open space areas. d. The implementation.df"natural' stormwater management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc...). E. VERIFICATION I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/SponsorNa lr'ior0 c'/'f' Date /"/.2�'8"Dd Signature- LA,� Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 6 • APPLICANT • ,. TRANSACTIONAL 111SCLOSORE PORN The Town of Soutliold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the art of town officers and em to ees. The Purpose of this form to Provide information which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it tv take whatever action is necessary to avoid Ls_amLmV J- e. / YOUR NAME, OtTlefCA 1- C • rn � �i QQ &n .e� . RO T (Last name, first name, middle initial, unl es you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so, Indicate the other person's or company's name. ) NATURE OF APPLICATION, (Check all that apply. ) Tax grievance variance Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from pl Other t or official map ic (If "Other, " name thg activity. ) Do you personally (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes . by blood, marriage, or business interest. "business Interest- means a business, including a partnership, in which the town officer or employee llas even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5% of the shares. YES NO X If you answered "YES," complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, Or child is (check all that apply) , A) the owner of greater than 5% of the shares of tl,e corporate stock of tl;e applicant (when the applicant is a corporation); S) the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a noncorporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation) ; C) an officer, director, Partner, or employee of the applicant; or D) the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION Oil RELATIONSHIP Submitted this p of 2-p0s—' Signature n Print name • Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 • C Southold, NY 11971 —�r RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/29/05 Receipt#: 4646 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 18-5-5 $330.00 Check#: 4646 Total Paid: $330.00 y Name: Ehrlich, Robert J 620 Old Farm Rd. Orient, NY 11939 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 18-5-5 > • Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 09/29/05 Receipt#: 1083 Transaction(s): Reference Subtotal 1 1 Application Fees 18-5-5a $692.90 Check#: 1083 Total Paid: $692.90 Name: Ehrlich, Robert J 620 Old Farm Rd. Orient, NY 11939 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID: 18-5-5a PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS MAILING ADDRESS: O� OF so P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE Southold, NY 11971 Chair JL OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS T Town Hall Annex KENNETH L.EDWARDS co Q 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D.SOLOMON yCOUIm, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1936 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM � � To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk RECEIVED k�4. Q %wn Clerk, From: Planning Department SEP 2 9 2005 Date: September 28, 2005 Southold Town Clerk Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name Project Type SCTM # Amount Check # Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan 18-5-5 $330.00 4646 Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan 18-5-5 $692.90 1083 LR encs. • • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B.WOODHOUSE O��OF SO!/r�p! Southold, NY 11971 Chair Q OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J.CREMERS Town Hall Annex KENNETH L. EDWARDS G Q 54375 State Route 25 MARTIN H.SIDOR %2`p wa�� (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON Colvi �'4` Southold, NY n 11 Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk From: Planning Department Date: September 28, 2005 Re: Checks Enclosed herewith are the checks listed below. Please return a receipt to us. Thank you. Project Name Project Type SCTM # Amount Check # Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan 18-5-5 $330.00 4646 Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan 18-5-5 $692.90 1083 LR encs. i S PATRICIA C. MOORE 50-791/214 4646 ATTORNEY BUSINESS ACCOUNT 4224010969 51020 MAIN RD. 7654330 SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 DATE 02 s 9�p� FPAYTOTH� E DOLLARS 8 North Fork Bank W W W.R°ane°Px I MEMO 1:0 2 140 79 1 21:u•4224IN,T109 4646 PoKSECURIIY WIPpWF.4.T1EBOfWOi OFT16 WCIIYFM CpIfAW6 MCPOPflMINfi ORIENT COFFEE CO. 50-791/214 1083 FF�a, PTO TBE OJILDERO' /OL�jo Of Inv,.,�R a+� N ►.ram/ fc,� �" nounxs 6 9 P40MTH FOR�BAIVK 230 MAIN STREET ENPORT.NY I I9 / FOR�0(/(J II.O0 108 31II I' 2 140 79 i 21:11' 3 2 24mO L i 59 ?III AU RRED SIGNATURE �NC W CFS A SECUR•Y SCIIEFN pI•ACK W T1E CHECK 1 x f i r Vp TW' e s 1 r ` . Lr. X ..71AMd�1. n-' r tt r�x +I� ! mi- PLAN N 51TUATE: %0RIENT Tom. S19mD KELL w E 5UFFOLK 1CAOVNTr, W SUFFOLK GOUNITY TAX # 1000-18-5-5 O¢ S MAP PREPARED: 0I-22-03 WELL LOCATED 02-13-03 UPDATE 03-Ob-03, 04-0-1-03 I N 2; I septlC 150'. 0WNEL- Rabat DICE a dwelling 2254 Mlip R0d z concrete }_ OrielaNY 11957 dewolk well , r0 4'' septic 15ay so I I tree stop a slyna r ne I treeO q'blke 1 � srgn d Historic double b h now Tree s Planted e q e of/d e by early co Crete curb of whit l ��_ ove line 1 men settlers it t 1 e" Main sR#25oad _ 82°(Il� 7' S8301 . / l� 1 p I •� �eI.IDS' Y Po�kin i � Monument ❑❑ q Lu`� g �, I tis to Local '\,ELL L Veterans Q N y Q c h¢u ; ^ NOTES: g _So' P ■ MONUMENT O PIPE -1 `,tg.!' g I os� en apaN + 8n" h Q' STAKEm�s? o 5 SANITARY K KITCHEN +� �o EP EXPAN51ON POOL "� C� .I.ms. 5T 5EPTIG � TANK i p" caw GT GREASE TRAP e �3 3 114"l- Aj LP LEACHING POOL � c0` s162��-'9. 2. /o se/ eve ,% ' v AREA = 12,148 5F OR 0 28 ACRES N � 075 a AV 9 fAQ) Lny� r- 8. o PROPERTY RE51DE5 IN: .93 ca i o 4-v 11 <vq � we, ZONE "B" GENERAL 13UI5NE55 WELL d 5EPTI6 LOGATIONS PROVIDED BY OTHERS p e//i 9� yweL °p '°y ELEVATIONS REFERENGE COUNTY TOPO MAPS 9 V JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR GRAPH IG SCALE I"= 20' 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S.LIC.NO. 50202 RIVERHEAD,N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF.-\\Hp server\d\PROS\OI-302c.pro �pF soUly �S ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE �� OHO Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK P.O. Box 1179 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS H >c Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER • �O Fax(631) 765-6145 RECOFREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER AGEMENT OFFICEROl�CDU �� Telephone(631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town Board Town Attorney Planning Board John Cushman Jon Shearin, Roy Reeve Agency From: Linda J. Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk Date: May 9, 2006 Re: Article 78—Robert Ehrich Attached hereto is an Article 78 filed by Robert Ehrich again t h pla s Board -- �— ".'" E E E I MAY 10 2006 Southold Town pip Wfil REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTBRVENTION UCS-840(REV 1/2000) sV'rXon&_ Zb1k m#y 9[ z y Fo COURT COUNTY INDEX NO. DATE PURCHASED pumb PLAINTIFF(S) : T O .� � IAS entry date DEFENDANT(3) : f L/It t4 tom[ I a(G 'g o Wa i> o f Tld tT Judge Assigned RJI Date Date issue joined: _ Bill of particulars aerved (YIN) : [ ]Yes [ ]No .. ... ....... .......... ........ ............................... ................. ..... .............. ... NATURE OF JUDICIAL IFMVENTICN (check ONE box only AND enter information) r I I Request for preliminary conference bwotice of D 2 b�petition reGur�date: Relief sought I I Note of issue and/or certificate of readiness [ I Notice of medical or dental malpractice action (specify: ) I 1 Notice of motion (return dates: ) Relief sought [ ] Statement of net worth [ I Order to show ..use [ ] Writ of habeas corpus RECEIVED (clerk enter return date:_ ) --''^^ Relief sought [ ] Other (specify: /�'�C/ '0M [ I Other ex parts application (specify: _ MAY Southold Town Cleri NATURE OF ACTION OR PROCEEDINO (Check ONE box only) MATRIMONIAL Malpractice [ ) Contested -CM ( ] Medical/Podiatric -pM [ I Uncontested -UM [ ] Dental -DM [ ] *Other Professional -OPM COMMERCIAL I 1 Contract -CONT [ I Motor Vehicle -MV I ] Corporate -CORP [ I -Products Liability -PL [ I Insurance (where insurer is a, party, except arbitration) -INS ( ] Environmental EN [ ] UCC (including tales, negotiable -UCC [ ] Asbestos -ASH instrument.) [ ] Breast Implant _RI [ I *Other Commercial -OC [ I *Other Negligence -OTN [ ] -Other Tort (including REAL PROPERTY intentional) -OT [ I Tax Certiorari -TAX [ I Foreclosure -FOR SPECIAL PROCREDINOS [ I Condemnation -COND [ I Art. 95 (Arbitration) -ART55 [ I Landlord/Tenant -LT [ Art. 99 (Trutt.) -ART99 I I *Other Real Property -ORP Art. 98 -ART98 I T Election Law -ELEC [ I Guardianship (MEL Art. 81) -GUARD81 OTHER MATTERS [ I *Other Mental Hygiene -MHYG ( I * -OTH ( ] *Other special Proceeding -OSP TORTS w Check -YES- or 'NO' for each of the followinggnestions, Is this action/proceeding against a YES NO YES I ) Municipality: ( ) Public Authority: (Specify So Vnti' ) (Specify ) YES NO I 1 ";� Does this action/proceeding seek equitable relief? ( ) i� e• this action/proceeding seek recovery for personal injury? Does this action/proceeding seek recovery for property damage? Pro-Note Time Frames. (This applies to all cases exaspt contested matrimonial, and tax certiorari cases) Estimated time period for case to be ready for trial (from filing of RJI to filing of Note of Issue) : /'�pedited: 0-8 month. O Standard: 9-12 months ❑ Complex: 13-15 months Contested Mat imoaf 1 Ca as Onl (Check and give date) Has .ummon. been served? ❑ No ❑ Yee, Date Was a Notice of No Necessity filed? ❑ No ❑ Yes, Date ATTORNEY(SI FOR PLAINTIFF(S) : Self Komi Rea • Add.*.. phone / .4 C. M Op?F. S1oVO MK17f/ R0&1*;p r z ❑ S=`/-3 0 ATTOANEY(8) FOR DEPENDANTS) Se f Name Address Rec,• Phone 'Self Represented: parties representing themselves, without an attorney, should check the "Self Rep.^ box and enter their name, address, and phone # in the .pace provided above for attorneys. INSURANCE CARRIERS: RELATED CASES (18RELATED CASES NONE, it. -NONE- below) )•NONE• b 1 ) Tittle Index # Court Nature of Relationship ofRelationship t 04� I AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, OTHER THAN AS NOTED ABOVE, THERE ARE AND HAVE BEEN NO RELATED ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS, NOR T FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION PREVIOUSLY BEEN FILED IN THIS ACTION OR PROCEEDING. Dated: MAY � , 200,6 d '�- IGNATURE) VATR%CIk e . moo QF (PRINT OR TYPE NAME) ATTORNEY FOR ATTACH RIDER SKEET IF NECESSARY TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION \Gems\r]�zoaa.wpi SUPREME COURT, SUFFOLK COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK ROBERT EHRLICH, Petitioner, NOTICE OF PETITION for a judgment pursuant to Index# B/o Article 78 of the CPLR -against- Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, Kenneth L. Edwards, Martin H. Sidor, George D. Solomon and Joseph L. Townsend constituting the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Respondents. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed petition of ROBERT EHRLICH verified May 8 2006, and upon the Record and Certified Return of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, an application will be made to this Court at an IAS Part thereof to be held at the Supreme Court, located at 235 Griffing Avenue,Riverhead,New York on May 29, 2006 at 9:30 AM; or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, for a Judgment pursuant to CPLR Article 78,reviewing and reversing;a certain determination of the Respondent Southold Town Planning Board filed April 11, 2006 and directing the granting of site plan approval for the petitioner's property and for such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper and equitable, including declaratory relief if the pleadings and proof warrant same. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that an Answer, Certified Return and supporting affidavits, if any, shall be served at least five (5) days before the return date, pursuant to CPLR 7804[c] Petitioner designates Suffolk County as the place of Trial. Dated: Southold, New York May 8, 2006 Patricia C. Moore Attorney for Petitioner 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 (631) 765-4330 SUPREME COURT, SUFFOLK COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK ROBERT EHRLICH, Petitioner, for a judgment pursuant to PETITION Article 78 of the CPLR ASSIGNED JUDGE: -against- Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, INDEX# Kenneth L. Edwards, Martin H. Sidor, George D. Solomon and Joseph L. Townsend constituting the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Respondents To the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk, the Petitioner, Robert Ehrlich, by his attorney Patricia C. Moore hereby respectfully alleges and states: NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS 1. This is a proceeding under Article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules seeking to review the determinations of the respondents herein to deny a site plan to convert 572 square feet of sales area in an existing two story structure to operate a gift shop selling Antiques- Auction Gallery- Arts & Crafts, in a Business Zoned parcel. Petitioner seeks to annul and reverse the respondent's decisions which denies approval of a site plan of said permitted use. PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING 2. The petitioner in this action is a the owner of certain real property located at 22540 Main Road, Orient, County of Suffolk, State of New York. 3. The respondents in this action are members of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York of which respondent Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, is the Chair. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 4. The Town of Southold enacted its first zoning code in 1957. The Town's most recent town-wide comprehensive re-zoning was done in 1989 at which time a new zoning map and town zoning code were adopted. Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code is designated as the"Southold Town Zoning Code"(hereinafter"Zoning Code") 5. The Zoning Code establishes the zoning classifications segregating the town's land uses into several residential, business, marine and industrial districts. 6. The Zoning Code states: "The purpose of the General Business (B) District is to provide for retail and wholesale commercial development and limited office and industrial development outside of the hamlet central business areas,generally along major highways." 7. Among the uses permitted in the`B"General Business zoning district are:wholesale businesses;building;, electrical and plumbing contractor's businesses or yards;wholesale or retail sale of garden materials;funeral homes;bus stations,car washes,restaurants,and bars. 8. The Petitioner's property is located in the `B"General Business District located on NY State Route 25 along with several other retail business properties. The Petitioner's property fronts NY State Route 25, is bordered on the east by a public road and on the west by a retail sales/manufacturer of candy. A copy of the portion of the Town's Zoning Map showing the Petitioner's property is annexed as Exhibit A 9. The Petitioner's business zoned property abuts residentially zoned property to the south. These two residential properties do not front NY State Route 25. Rather, they front the main street into the hamlet business district of Orient. The abutting residential property to the south is improved with a single family residence, a non-conforming two and one-half story two bay garage and a two hundred square foot shed located virtually on the property line shared with the petitioner. Upon information and belief, this residential property is owned by a Douglas Constant who purchased the property in 1993. 10. The Petitioner's property is improved with a two story building consisting of approximately 1,900 square feet in size. The property has mature landscaping along the east side of the property,; a six foot privet hedge on the east, and to the south a six foot stockade fence located on the neighbor's property'. RESPONDENT OPPOSES USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE APPLICATION EVEN FILED 11. In May, 2005 Petitioner submitted an application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for approval of a"coffee house"in the existing structure on his property, a permitted use in the General Business zoning district. 12. Before Petitioner had even submitted an application to the Respondent for site plan review under the provisions of the Southold Town Code, the Respondent, by its staff, and neighbors personally appeared before the Department of Health Services to oppose the Petitioner's application. 13. In addition to appearing at the hearing,the Respondent also sent a letter to the Health Department expressing its opposition to the application. In this letter the Respondent opined that the site and location of the proposed use were insufficient for the proposed use even Upon information and belief,during the course of the respondent's review of petitioner's site plan application, the neighbor took down the stockade fence on his property in an attempt to exaggerate the professed impact petitioner's use of the business property would have on him. Petitioner's site plan application included provision for a stockade fence located within the property lines of the petitioner's property to establish screening from the neighbor's property. though the Respondent had no application before it. 14. As a direct result of the Respondent's stated opposition,the Health Department denied approval of the coffee house,and granted approval for commercial use limited to"dry retail" uses. The Health Department required the Petitioner to file covenants and restrictions upon his property to insure compliance with this limitation on its use. Petitioner's Site Plan Application 15. In February, 2005 Petitioner submitted a preliminary site plan application to the Respondent for a dry retail use consistent with the limitation placed on his property by the Health Department. Petitioner's application sought approval of a"gift store"consisting of 542 square feet of sales area within the existing building on his property. 16. The property which adjoins Petitioner's to the west is improved with a 2,000 square foot retail / manufacturing business making and selling candy. To the west of the candy manufacturer are two more gift shops,one located in a converted ranch house,and the second in a converted cottage. 17. The Respondent has allowed all of these retail gift shops to operate without any site plan approvals. 18. These gift shops do not comply with parking requirements of the Town Code; they have absolutely no landscape or other buffers with the adjoining residential properties; and these shops are more than twice the size of the gift shop requested by the Petitioner. 19. To the east of Petitioner's property is a gasoline station. The service bays of the gas station were converted to a retail convenience store without site plan approval. 20. It is common practice of the Respondent to permit a "simplified" site plan review when a property owner proposes to use existing structures for a business, and no physical changes are being made to the buildings. In such instances, a property survey showing the existing site conditions is submitted and used by the Respondent to approve the site plan. 21. The Petitioner's first site plan submission made using this "simplified"procedure. Respondent's Review of Petitioner's Application 22. In a letter dated April 7,2005, Respondent advised the Petitioner to submit a formal site plan application replete with a checklist of thirty requirements to be satisfied for the conversion of the existing building to the proposed gift shop. 23. Thereafter, in a letter dated April 25, 2005 the Respondent wrote a letter to the Petitioner directing yet additional information be provided with the site plan application showing the total square footage of the existing structure and the square footage that would be used for the proposed sales area. 24. On or about May 9, 2005 the first of what would become numerous site plan drawings, and a floor plan, were submitted to the planning board for approval. 25. The site plan showed the required parking spaces for the use. 26. The site plan showed the existing landscaping ofmature trees providing a seventy foot buffer to the east of the building. 27. The site plan showed the proposed parking in the rear of the property adjacent to the garage and driveway of the adjoining residential neighbor(the property owned by Constant) and the abutting residential property's six foot high hedge (the property owned by King) 28. The site plan showed a grass buffer area and a six foot high stockade fence bordering the proposed parking area to screen the neighboring property. 29. The site plan showed a cross-easement area with the adjoining business property to the west that was required by the planning board for the future development of the abutting candy manufacturer. 30. The site plan included a floor plan showing the existing conditions and the proposed use of the building. 31. The complete site plan was submitted to the Southold Town Building Department in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code section 100-253. 32. The Southold Town Building Department certified the proposed use as a permitted use in the General Business zoning district and determined the number of parking spaces required for the proposed use. 33. On or about May 20,2005 the Suffolk County Department of Health Services granted approval for a"dry"retail use as requested by the petitioner. 34. The Respondent Planning Board's office staff site plan examiner reviewed the Petitioner's proposed site plan and directed that additional landscaping, another parking space, and the relocation of two parking spaces to provide additional buffer to the southerly property line. These changes were made to the site plan. 35. Thereafter, on or about June 20,2005,the petitioner's site plan was presented to the respondent planning board at a work session of the board. During this meeting the owner of the neighboring residential property appeared (Constant). 36. The neighbor's objections to the site plan and his conversation with the chair of the respondent board,made it clear that the chair would be leading the opposition to the approval of any site plan for this property. 37. Upon information and belief the chair is a member of a neighborhood civic association know as the "Orient Association." This group opposed any business use of the petitioner's property and distributed flyers pronouncing this opposition. A copy of the flyer is annexed as Exhibit B . 38. Upon information and belief,the chair lives in the vicinity of the petitioner's property. The chair improperly used her position as a public officer to advance the cause of the Orient Association,and acted in a biased,self-interested review of the petitioner's application. Upon information and belief the chair was in direct communication with the objecting neighbor through email and other informal channels of communication. 39. Petitioner, by his attorney, demanded on June 28, 2005 that the site plan be acted upon. 40. Upon information and belief, the chair of the respondent pressured planning staff members to demand greater levels of scrutiny than other similarly situated businesses. 41. Upon information and belief, the chair directed the removal of a staff member from the file review petitioner's application. 42. After the June 20, 2005 work session, the Respondent's staff continued to direct modifications to the site plan drawings. These modifications were made by the Petitioner, and on or about July:i,2005 were submitted to the Respondent Planning Board and thereafter were summarily rejected by the respondent. 43. In a letter dated July 28, 2005 the respondent demanded additional information and modifications to the site plan and further advised that it deemed the application"incomplete" Among the new information now demanded from the petitioner was a statement of the hours of operation of the proposed business. The respondent's chair also demanded that an existing kitchen sink be removed from the building. In an attempt to mollify the demands of the chair, the petitioner agreed to remove the "offending" sink. 0 44. The Respondent's July 28, 2005 letter required the submission of a "C&R". 45. The Planning Board failed to state what the Respondent wanted the petitioner to covenant or restrict against his property. 46. On or about August 24, 2005 the petitioner submitted the information demanded in the respondent's July 28, 2005 letter. 47. The site plan.was amended again at the respondent's request. Specifically,the parking was moved farther from the property line and the buffer area increased; shrubbery was added around the front porch to direct pedestrian movement to the front door and limit pedestrian movement across the driveway; the trash receptacle was moved to the west side of the property and enclosed by fencing;the proposed parking layout was revised again,and a turn- around space was provided in addition to the required parking; signage was provided for a dedicated parking space for employee parking;the details of the handicap ramp/access were provided. And with all of these changes the chairperson continued to oppose the site plan. 48. On or about September 28,2005 the Respondent finally advised that it had authorized its staff to begin the formal review process of the site plan. 49. The respondent's escalating demands for modifications to the petitioner's site plans led to inconsistent demands. In one site drawing,the petitioner showed a"turn around"area for delivery trucks. Respondent rejected the layout and yet,thereafter, demanded a drawing or analysis from petitioner's site plan design engineer showing"truck turning and circulation in the parking area" 50. The chairperson of the Respondent insisted that the town Zoning Code requires a twenty five foot buffer between business and residential properties and that this provision of the code is inviolate. Other members of the respondent board disagreed and the assistant town attorney advised the Board in an open meeting that the twenty-five foot buffer requirement was not:fixed. The attorney advised that the Respondent that the Zoning Code expressly provides that"[a] landscaped berm,wall or fence of a location,height, design and materials approved by the Planning Board may be accepted for any portion of the required planting and/or buffer area." 51. Upon information and belief, the Respondent Planning Board has never applied the twenty-five foot buffer as an absolute minimum requirement. It has regularly, and consistently used the:authority granted within sections 100-213(A)through(E) of the Zoning Code to vary the screening requirements as appropriate and as necessitated by the site conditions of each property. Notably, the parcels located to the immediate west of the Petitioner's property which operate as retail shops have been opened with no site plan review or approval, and provide absolutely no buffer at all. 52. The Petitioner's property includes a seventy foot wooded buffer area on its easterly side. The neighboring property has an existing six foot privet hedge providing natural buffering from the petitioner's property. The proposed site plan included supplemental buffering with a fence and a double row of fast growing five to six feet high Leyland cypress trees. The existing structure would retain its style with the placement of parking to the rear of the building. The two bay garage, driveway and shed of the residential property are all located along the shared property line where the petitioner's proposed parking would be located. 53. The New York State Department of Transportation granted its site plan approval for the proposed use and the access proposed for New York State Route 25 on which the property is located.. 54. On or about October 13, 2005 Petitioner's attorney again voiced objections to the unfair, unequal treatment the petitioner's site plan application was being subjected to when compared to similarly situated business properties throughout the Town,and more pointedly, within the very same business area in which the Petitioner's property is located. 55. In response, on October 28, 2005 the Planning Board demanded that the site plan application be updated because they had changed the form they were using. They requested an updated Environmental Assessment Form and a Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan form. All of these additional forms were completed and submitted. 56. In an attempt to delay and obstruct the petitioner's application, the Respondent arbitrarily and capriciously demanded the submission of a design professional's certification or a set of preliminary construction drawings detailing fire separation within the existing structure. Petitioner's design professional advised that such information would be submitted after the site plan had been approved. 57. Upon information and belief, the chair of the Respondent Planning Board actively lobbied members of the Southold Town Board to re-zone the Petitioner's property to a non- business designation while delaying the review of the petitioner's site plan application. 58. Respondent demanded, and the Petitioner's engineer provided, a diagram and his written determination that the Petitioner's parking area could accommodate a delivery truck with appropriate turning area. This engineer's statement and diagram were required by the Respondent even though the Zoning Code sets forth parking, aisle width and dimensional requirements that account for standard truck delivery. In one of the previously submitted site plans to the Respondent, the Petitioner had provided a specific tum-around area for a truck delivery. The Respondent had rejected this layout earlier. 59. The Respondent thereafter demanded the Petitioner submit a certification that the building would comply with the New York State Building Code. This was provided. 60. The site plan was forwarded to the local Orient Fire Department for comment—no objections were made. 61. The site plan was forwarded to the Suffolk County Department of Planning for comment in accordance with the New York General Municipal Law§239-m. The County Planning Department held that this was a matter for local determination. 62. On or about January 6,2006 the petitioner again demanded that action be taken on the site plan. 63. On or about January 17, 2006 the Southold Town Building Department clarified its certification of the proposed use establishing that the use under consideration was specifically permitted use in the General Business zone—specifically "Antiques—Auction Gallery—Arts & Crafts" 64. The town Zoning Code has clearly established parking requirements for this use set forth in section 100-191 stating that Antique shop, auction gallery, arts and crafts shop and workshops require one parking space per 250 square feet of sales area. 65. On or about: January 13, 2006 the Petitioner offered to increase the proposed landscaping to include a double row of five to six foot tall Leyland Cypress as an additional screening in addition to the existing and proposed screening and the six foot high stockade fence to be placed along the property line. 66. On or about January 23, 2006 the petitioner again requested that the site plan public hearing be scheduled. 67. On or about January 24, 2006 the Respondent demanded that the site plan be revised to "include a safety barricade to protect health and property" in the proposed parking area. The Respondent also demanded that the petitioner provide covenants and restrictions against the property to establish a cross-easement with the adjoining business property. 68. On or about February 2, 2006 the petitioner provided the demanded covenant for review by the Southold Town Attorney. 69. On or about February 14,2006 the Respondent finally agreed to set the public hearing for March 13,2006 and rendered a determination under SEQRA that the petitioner's site plan was a Type II action not subject to environmental review. 70. On or about: February 17, 2006, Respondent demanded that the covenants and restrictions providing a cross easement with the adjoining business property be filed prior to the date of the public hearing and prior to its decision on the site plan application. 71. Petitioner filed such a covenant against his property as demanded by respondent prior to the public hearing and the respondent's decision on the application. 72. A public hearing was finally held on March 13, 2006. Residents of the community voiced objection to the proposed business. Many objected to the fact that the property is zoned for business, and that no business should be permitted on the Petitioner's property. 73. Petitioner submitted photographs of the existing building the surrounding business properties and offered the expert testimony of the engineer who designed the site plan under consideration. No contrary expert testimony or opinion was provided by any of those objecting to the proposed site plan. 74. Petitioner voiced objection again to the unequal treatment being given to his application. Petitioner identified the surrounding business property uses which have been established without any site plan review, and which operate without any objection by the • Respondent. 75. On or about April 10,2006 after sixteen months of review and ten versions of the site plan with numerous; revisions made at Respondent's request, the Respondent denied the Petitioner's site plan application. 76. The Respondent acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it refused to accept the Building Department's interpretation of the zoning code and applied the wrong parking criteria to the petitioner's site plan application to justify its denial of the site plan application. 77. Respondent's decision is irrational, arbitrary and capricious. 78. Respondent's decision is not supported by the evidence submitted and the record before it. 79. The chair of the Respondent Board acted improperly and in violation of her obligations as a public officer and member of the Respondent Town Planning Board. 80. The Respondent acted in excess of its legal authority and jurisdiction when it purported to interpret the provisions of the town Zoning Code contrary to the determination made by the Town Building Department. 81. The Respondent Planning Board engaged in a systematic abuse of the site plan review process and acted contrary to the laws of the State of New York and the Town's Zoning Code. WHEREFORE,your petitioner prays that judgement be granted herein reversing the Planning Board denial of the Petitioner's site plan application and for judgment directing the Respondent to approve the site plan and grant such other and further relief as to the Court is just and proper. i Dated: Southold, New York May 8, 2006 .-- atricia C. Moore Attorney for Petitioner 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: ss.: Patricia C. Moore,an attorney duly admitted to practice before the courts of the State ofNew York affirms the following under penalty of perjury: I am the attorney for. the Petitioner in this proceeding. I have read the foregoing Petition and know the contents thereof which I believe to be true based upon correspondence and other writings furnished to me by the petitioner,and interviews with agents of the defendant and materials within file records and public records. This verification is made pursuant to CPLR 3020(d)(3)on the ground that the defendant is not in the county in which I have my office. Catricia Dated: Southold,New York C. Moore May 8, 2006 EXHIBIT A • • v AT' DR WW H� p 9 2 O y ,OWNS MLL RO �W EDWARDSIN D DE ONS D RNTf RD 01 w G 3 �� r bR D5/ ao 4 A S WN 3 O <p �A 9 \ IL( W D � R 0 EXHIBIT B uee. ia • tuuo it cur hVV111I0 mENT ASSOCIATION December, 2005 A FEW WORDS OF EXPLANATION AND A REQUEST Anyone who has been following local events has heard of the Orient Association,but some of you may not know what OA is or that OA wants you to be a member. You may have joined the Labor Day 'Take Bade Our Roads" rally at Orient Point cosponsored by OA, or attended the OA forum in October for candidates for Southold town offices. We are a civic association, founded.in 1984 to provide a forum for discussion of issues of concern to the community and to present the views of Orient residents to town, county and state officials Below are brief summaries of our most important current adivwm Membership in the Orient Association is open to all residents or.property owners in Orient. We are sometimes confused with OHS (the Oysterponds Historical Society) or OCA orids CommuityActivities) lilae thjdl�. As an OA member, you get nospeciapOA'spositions and the krrowledgg that yourms Voiceinthetown. are $ 0a funds pay for news) ens and otter m t for rerfal of Poquahank Hall and icr legal help. Please send you dues to Orient Association, P.O. Box 282, Orient, NY 11957. THE "COFFEEHOUSE" In 2002, Robert Ehrlich received a iktuor license and applied for permission to operate a coffeehouse in the Victorian home at the southtwest corner of village Lane and Mein Road. In his application to the NYState Liquor Authority,_ he stated that it would be open from 7 am. to 10:30 p•m., with plped4n or.live �t Although the house has always been a private residence, the rty was arbitrarily rezoned for commercial we about20 a. Fearing lhe In lhe Historic District and harassed bu fic around an alb�resdy dangerous IIntersectatntrusion of-noise and �some 250 residents signed a pet(t ri sppnsored by. OA,asking the or Authority to revoke Mr. E hrlich's1mrise. OA alerted the NY'State• Liquor. Board that•the'license was apparently obtained under false premises and it was revoked. However, an application Is fir► before the Planning Board for use of the building as an antiques store.Our fear.is that if the a' pp�a is approved the owner will obf h a aommtsdal o�ifioats of ocx:upanry and be ab el � to reap''ly for-the liquor license and convert-the pfbrtpyer�tyr�tdo a ootfeehousebar/restaurant. )A's posfdon is that whle usle such as the beg use attorneyrs tor. douWs offices would acceptaable andueg to be as a private s a resideritlatibusiness wou fak to the property owner. Even though the site is commercially zoned there is na way Ghat the plan submitted to the Planning Board can conform to business zoning requirements for parking buffers, etc.Our position Is fhaf the Board has every justlNcation to reject this application. As-. always, community input can make the differenoe; we urge Orient residents to attend Planning Board meetings on this Issue. We will keep you Informed of dates and times. THE CROSS SOUND FERRY Concern about ferry t affic was an issue when the Orient Association was founded in 1984. In 1995, when CSF initiated its high-speed ferry without planning permission, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads, originally a committee of OA, was expanded to Include of of Southold Town. Despite an enormous amount of work by volunteers, the cooperation of SUPREME COURT, SUFFOLK COUNTY STATE OF NEW YORK Index# ROBERT EHRLICH, Petitioner, for a judgment pursuant to Article 78 of the CPLR -against- Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chair, Kenneth L. Edwards, Martin H. Sidor, George D. Solomon and Joseph L. Townsend constituting the PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, Respondents. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL INTERVENTION NOTICE OF PETITION and PETITION Patricia C. Moore Attorney for Petitioner 51020 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 (631) 765-4330 Signature Rule: 22 NYCRR §130-1.1-a ncia C. Moore • • sL)13F PATRICIA A. FINNEGAN SCOTT A. RUSSELL BJ TOWN ATTORNEY ��OFsouryo Supervisor patricia.£mnegan@town.southold.ny.us Q KIERAN M. CORCORAN #[ Town Hall Annex, 54375 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY N � kieran.corcoran@town.southold.ny.us St-IRS Southold, New York 11971-0959 LORI HULSE MONTEFUSCO 'YCow, Telephone (631) 765-1939 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY ' Facsimile (631) 765-6639 lori.montefusco@town.southold.ny.us OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 12, 2006 Frank A. Isler, Esq. Smith, Finkelstein, Lundberg, Isler and Yakaboski, LLP 456 Grilling Avenue, P.O. Box 389 Riverhead, NY 11901-0203 RE: Robert Ehrlich v. Southold Town Planning Board Index No. 06-12811 (Article 78) Return Date: May 29, 2006 Dear Mr. Isler: I am enclosing copies of the papers we received in connection with the new Article 78 proceeding referenced above. We look forward to working with you on this matter. Very truly yours, Kieran M. Corcoran KMC/Ik Assistant Town Attorney Enclosures cc: Members of the Town Board (w/o encls.) Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk (w/o encls.) Members of the Planning Board (w/o encls.) n E"2006 Mr. John Cushman, Comptroller (w/o encls.) U . Southold Town Planning Board � Sir s PATRICIA C. MOORE " h Attorney at Law -- Main Road 51020 Main Road r Q 2W6 j Southold,New York 11971 r ,11 Tel: (631) 765-4330 ( ' �S,�,old Town� — Fax: (631) 765-4643 r p- ire board April 13, 2006 Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Robert Ehrlich Premises: 22540 NYS Road 25 and the s/w corner of NYS 25 and Village Lane, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Hearing: March 13, 2006 Dear Ladies/Gentlemen: Please provide me with a transcript of the above referenced hearing. Thank you. Very truly yours, 2 3 Patricia C. Moore PCM/mr 7 µ �o Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District Table of Contents IA Ehrlich property- retained residential character of property 1B view of structure from Route 25, Orient 2A. Corner lot- main entrance to Orient Hamlet Business District, Oyster Pond Museum, Village Lane and Orient United Methodist Church. The Ehrlich property retains the residential appearance and preserved the park like yard adjacent to Village Lane 3A. View from Village Lane 3B Signs along Route 25 directing traffic to Orient Ha ss istrict - Route 1 main traffic route to Orient Ferry. " 4A Ehrlich side yard- park like look retained U 1 1 5A Constance property- Constance 2 story, 2 'h bay gara e, 1 StStit from) hrlich 1 JJJ property line and driveway for their vehicles i som Tovn 6A View of garage-proposed site plan will plant double r w n>N Bad ootfAe to protect Ehrlich retail use from Constance residential pro a 6B View of garage. Ehrlich land surrounds garage. 7A View west of Ehrlich property 7B View west of Ehrlich property- adjacent properties are commercial retail uses ("Candy Man" gift shop and candy manufacturer and"The Little House" gift shop) 8A view toward "Candy Man" and "Little House"- Ehrlich site plan granted a cross easement. Planning Board required recording of Cross Easement(exhibit 14) 8B view of the Little House gift shop @1,200 sq.ft. of retail space 9A also part of Little House gift shop- used as outdoor display area 10A Little House parking- along residential street- adjacent to residence- no buffer 10B Little House parking- adjacent to residence 11A residential neighbor- adjacent to Little house parking f 12A Candy Man with adjacent residence 12B dumpster-loading area for candy man adjacent to residence 12C unregulated parking along residential road 13A View to East (Firehouse)route to Orient Ferry 13B Hands Gas Station- new coffee shop-deli 14 Cross-Easement Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The existing building will be preserved, parking off the road and in the rear to retain the residential look of the property. 3 ;� Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The existing building will be preserved, parking off the road and in the rear to retain the residential look of the property. qA Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The Ehrlich parking is located in the rear. The site plan proposes a double row of evergreens and a 6 foot fence to buffer any noise or light. The Constance property (1000-18-5-7) has a large two and one-half bay, two story, garage adjacent to the parking, and their driveway. The Constance six foot fence was removed by the owner but the posts and a partial fence remains. 5A Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The Ehrlich parking is located in the rear. The site plan proposes a double row of evergreens and a 6 foot fence to buffer any noise or light. The Constance property (1000-18-5-7) has a large two and one-half bay, two story, garage adjacent to the parking, and their driveway. The Constance six foot fence was removed by the owner but the posts and a partial fence remains. W, o t A Hli Ad A 0 Imp" Move. AA*. .-*MOO,: ■ :-� y - ^ ? �� ^� LEM} Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The Little House also has an additional 500 sq. ft. building which is used for outdoor display. Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The "Little House" retail store is also adjacent to residential property and their parking is not shielded of buffered. This retail gift store is bigger then the Ehrlich plan. JOA IF-)P) Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The "Little House" retail store is also adjacent to residential property and their parking is not shielded of buffered. This retail gift store is bigger then the Ehrlich plan. 0 Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District At the request of the Planning Board Ehrlich has Covenanted to a cross -easement for "The Candy Man". Unlike Ehrlich's site plan, the Candy Man parking backs onto Route 25 (a dangerous condition) and abuts residential property without any protective buffers. 12 � Z C) I2C Hearing: March 13, 2006 Proposed Site Plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District The location of retail along Route 25 is surrounded by commercial uses. Also located within 500 feet are municipal buildings (the Fire House & School) The Gas Station was recently expanded with a coffee house -Deli and no site plan review was required. ISIAN we 1 2 • Number of pages +a. �b f3 to TORRENS siE8,4: 4?F s:apr-OD CHt`1F;Lci Serial# Certificate # -` Prior Cit. # Deed . Mortgage Instrument Deed / Mortgage Tax Stamp I Recording / Filing Stamps I — FEES Page / Filing Fee Mortgage Amt. 1. Basic Tax _ Handling 5 _00 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Spec. / Assit. Notation or - EA-5217 (County) Sub Total Spec. / Add. TOT. MTG. TAX EA-5217 (State) Dual Town _ Dual County R.P.T.S.A.` Held for Appointment _ Transfer Tax ,p Comm. of Ed. 5. 00j, Mansion Tax e z s Affidavit '�.�,�y' The property covered by this motgage is or will be improved by a one or two Certified Copy family dwelling only. YES or NO Reg. Copy Sub Total If NO, see appropriate tax clause on Other Grand Total page # of this instrument. 4 District NY Section I Block Lot 5 Community Preservation Fund Real 1000 01800 0500 005000 Consideration Amount $ 0.00 Property T CPF Tax Due $ 0.00 P S Tax Service R LPA A Agency 03-MAR Improved Verification Vacant Land 6 Satisfaction/Discharges/Release List Property Owners Mailing Address TD RECORD & RETURN TO: PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ TD 51020 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 TD 7 1 Title Company Information Co. Name PECONIC ABSTRACT, INC. 'Fide # 8 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached DECLARATION AND COVENANT made by (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) ROBERT FHRI ICH The premisis herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK. TO In the Township of SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the VILLAGE _ or HAMLET of ORIENT BOXES 6 THROUGH 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONt Y PRIOR Tn RP('C)Rnear, nR Fn TN(, 1 Li Copy IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DECLARATION/DOP Number of Pages: 4 Recorded: 03/03/2006 Receipt Number : 06-0021661 At: 10:36:57 AM LIBER: D00012438 District: Section: PAGE: 728 1000 Block: Lot: 018.00 05.00 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS 005.000 Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Page/Filing $12.00 Exempt COE $5.00 NO Handling $5.00 TP-584 $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG $15.00 Cert.Copies $5.00 NO Notation $0.00 SCTM $0.00 NO NO RPT $30.00 THIS PAGE Fees Paid IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT $77.00 THIS IS NOT A BILL Exempt NO NO NO NO 14 DECLARATION AND COVENANT THIS DECLARATION made 4day of February 2006 by ROBERT EHRLICH, residing at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New York 11579, hereinafter referred to as the Declarant, states as follows: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at 2254 Main Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto as provided by the Declarant; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of a site plan, prepared by Michael Mapes P.E., dated February 2, 2006, and as a condition of granting said approval, the Town of Southold Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk Couny Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that same will be in the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARANT WITNESSETH: That Declarant, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1 • That OWNER hereby authorizes the Planning Board to provide for an access to the adjacent westerly parcel known as "The Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1, and their successors and assigns, guests or invitees; for ingress and egress over the subject premises on the paved areas as shown on the site plan of Michael Mapes P.E., dated February 2, 2006. • The declarant hereby agrees to execute any and all documents which may be required to effectuate the common access where shown on the site plan. 3. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of Lie Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 4. These Covenants are not binding or take effect until such time as the Planning Board has reviewed and approved a site plan for the adjacent westerly parcel known as "'the Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1 and determined that a cross access is appropriate for the use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year above written. Robert Ehrlich STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss.: COUNTY OFStfflEgM) assal,� On the �J day of j`"(ir� 2006, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert Ehrlich personally known tome or proved tome on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within ^o + and grknowled2ed to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SS.: the CourtIJUDITH A. PASCALE, Acting Clerk of the Co of Record there do ereb certi County of Suffolk and annexed �yith the original fY at I have co pared the office..:raY.3.�..�........f ..............RECORDEDinmy copy thereof, and of the whole of such doMat the . same is a true In Testimony Whereof, I have hereon the seal of said County and Court se my han and thus ....� ....�...� C 4%-asa4cACTING CLER K • SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION • ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument at the intersection of the westerly line of Village Lane with the southerly line of Main Road from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along said westerly line of Village Lane, South 14 degrees 30 minutes East, 94.92 feet to a monument; THENCE along land now or formerly of Corcoran, two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 70.00 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 14 minutes West Hale; , 57.00 feet to land now or formerly of THENCE along said land now or formerly of Hale, three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 51.62 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 49 minutes West, 28.02 feet; 3) North 80 degrees 18 minutes West, 20.93 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE along land of Blanche Clingen, Elinor Bristow and Katharine Leslie, North 21 degrees 45 minutes East, 130.54 feet to an iron pipe on said southerly line of the Main Road; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road, two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 82 degrees 02 minutes East, 25.57 feet to a monument; 2) THENCE South 83 degrees 15 minutes East, 70.31 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. r� 41 Southold Town Planning Board Page Eight March 13, 2006 site inspection to find the site improvements are in conformity with the approved site plan. 5. If the as -built site improvements vary from the approved site plan, the Planning Board reserves the right to request a certified as -built site plan detailing all the changes. 6. Any changes from the approved site plan shall require Planning Board approval, and any such changes without Planning Board approval will be subject to referral to the Town Attorney's Office for possible legal action. Ken Edwards: Second the motion. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Ayes. Chairperson Woodhouse: Opposed? That motion carries. Thank you. Martin Kosmynka: Can I just make one comment? In the process, staff has been very professional to work with, and I thank them. Gtb,airaamon.Woodhouse: 6:10-s m..— Ehrlich.-RobarL._This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1,929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. and 941 sq. ft, of storage and 416 sq.ft. of miscellaneous space for art, antique and auction gallery use on a .28-acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Is there someone who would like to address the Board on this application? Excuse me, first we will hear from the attorney who is representing the applicant, Ms. Moore. Patricia Moore: Thank you. For the record, I am going to give you some documents. Two more cards have come in for your file. There are photographs, a table of contents (hands copy to each Board member on dais). As I go through, imagine yourself standing there, looking around, that's why I'm doing this, to make it simple. I have with me this evening, Mr. Ehrlich. Also with him is Georgine Hertzrig, who will be the operator of the store, and Mike Mapes who is the engineer on the site plan. If you have any questions certainly of the engineer with respect to the site plan that's been prepared, I will have him come up to certify that the site plan he has submitted to this Board is in accordance with the Code, but aside from that he will entertain any questions that you might have, so as to not take too long this evening. Southold Town Plannina Board Page Nine March 13, 2006 What I did is, I tried through photographs to describe the area and what we are trying to do. The first photographs, 1A and 1 B, are obviously the site. You can see that the site has retained its residential character and its look; Mr. Ehrlich has not changed the outside. I believe it was renovated by a prior owner and has been retained that way. Also, as far as your site plan is concerned, the area to the east of the house which is the side yard, as you go into Village Lane, is a park -like setting, which again has not been touched and will retain its look. Then, 2A is Village Lane, looking down across Main Road; you see the obelisk and the park area east of the house. Photograph 3A again shows you from the corner of the setback, from the corner of the existing house, and 3B is a photograph showing you the road signs looking easterly down Route 25. You can see that in this area, looking from in front of Candy Man, signs directs activity both down Route 25 and then down Village Lane to the Orient Hamlet Business District, Oyster Ponds Museums, and to the Methodist Church. So, the traffic flow here in this area obviously comes from Route 25 and then goes adjacent to this property down Village Lane. Photograph 4A, again giving you another viewpoint from the back of the property, looking out across the side yard again, adjacent to the Village Lane. Again, it points out the park -like setting of this property and Mr. Ehrlich's efforts to really preserve the property and to make it fit in the character of the Orient community. Photograph 5A shows you (I know Mr. Constant is here and he has been a very vocal opponent) that our parking area which I remind you has a double row of evergreens and a 6' fence, as well as a buffer from the vehicle parking, has Mr. Constant's garage, and also it shows you on 6A and 66 that we are dealing with a garage there that is two stories, 2-1/2 bays, and his vehicle happened to be there that day, is his own parking area. So, with respect to our parking area adjacent to a residence, what we have is a parking area that is adjacent to Mr. Constant's parking area. Nonetheless, we have created a buffer and made every effort to satisfy the Board that we are taking seriously the Code's requirement with respect to buffering noise, light and sound. The site plan shows this in detail. Photographs 7A and 7B looks at the property towards the west. In 7A you can see that my car happened to be parked there in the entrance in the parking area. You have the Candy Man that is a long-standing business there. Their parking is adjacent to ours. It also backs up onto Route 25. Certainly the Candy Man site plan meets none of the requirements of the Code. Photographs 8A and 8B show you in the westerly direction: (8A) shows you where we actually offered and recorded, at the Board's request, a cross -easement. That document has been recorded, the recorded document is in your file, and we offer that cross -easement to the Candy Man. Certainly the Candy Man has no obligation to open up the parking. We hope that in time that business will see that these businesses can work cooperatively together, share in the sense that they have common patrons and are very similar businesses, all three. Photograph 8B shows you the Little House. I apologize; the best photograph is the original. For the Board members who have a photocopy that didn't come out so good, I would ask that you look at the original. The Little House doesn't look very large from the front but in fact Southold Town Planning Board Page Ten March 13, 2006 consists of the front on Route 25 and also an additional accessory building where that business has for the most part seasonal outdoor display. When the weather is good, I am sure that's when they open their doors, show their wares and display their sales items out on the lawn. We point out that the Ehrlich site plan has gone through a very rigorous review. No doubt, I think the Board through its own record can note the time and the effort that's gone in, certainly with the Board's consideration of this site plan and the owner's revisions and offers of compromise with the Planning Board to make a site plan which we hope is approvable, think is approvable, and think should be approved. Photograph 10A: I was standing in the street facing the parking lot of the retail store, the Little House. it consists of approximately 1,200 s.f. in size, has crushed stone parking, no handicapped parking space, and no buffers. That's why I show you Photograph 10B, because you can see on the right hand side of that photograph the edge of the parking and how it is adjacent to a single family residence. There is no buffer, no fencing, no protection against light and noise, but that hasn't seemed to be a problem, because the use, which is comparable to our use, is a little retail store in Orient. Certainly this retail store is double the size of what Mr. Ehrlich is proposing, but it is a use that quite frankly relies on seasonal visitors, destination -type visitors. The ferry is a very high volume traffic generator as you know, as a matter of litigation that this Town has undertaken with Cross Sound Ferry. Nonetheless, when it comes to the ferry traffic, they don't oftentimes stop; either they're rushing to get there or tired and want to go home. So, what you're dealing with as far as traffic generation in Orient are day-trippers, visitors and destination travel. And I believe that's why these businesses, and certainly we want to be good neighbors and good business people with the other businesses, will all be symbiotic in their relationship, and not competitive. Photograph 11A shows you the full view of the house that's adjacent to the Little House. Photographs 12A, 12B and 12C address the Candy Man. With respect to the Candy Man, the top photograph, 12A, I did what is my equivalent to the panoramic shot. You see that the Candy Man has their dumpster in the back, and I can't tell whose fence it is, from the fact that the finished side is on the Candy Man's side would seem to imply that it's the residence fence, it looks like about a 4' high fence. There is again, no buffer, no noise abatement site plan elements incorporated here. In fact, this appears to be the loading area as well, so you have the Candy Man, which has been operating for a very long time with very little complaints I guess from the Planning Board otherwise there might have been some enforcement from Code Enforcement. You have wall-to-wall crushed stone here, no buffers, and loading areas adjacent to the residences. We are getting to the end of my photographs, Photographs 13A and 13B also show you the character of the area in front of, or by the Ehrlich property. 13A looking to the east, we have municipal facilities, which you can see the Fire Department within about 500' of this property; you also have the church across the way and you also have the school. Again, these are municipal buildings that, aside from the other residences there that have created their own buffers to protect them from ferry traffic I believe, we are dealing Southold Town Planning Board Page Eleven March 13, 2006 mostly with commercial municipal buildings. Finally, 13B is the Hand Station. Hand Station very recently opened up a deli/coffeehouse, I believe it's called "Delicious," which went through no site plan, went through no procedures, received no complaints (at least from my observations of Planning Board meetings has not been the subject of any enforcement) and they are operating there certainly without concern for their neighbors or the Orient community. They are a good business, and they have been there a very long time. However, a new deli, new coffee shop, was the reason why the Ehrlich property received such strenuous opposition initially because, as we all know, there had been an effort to put a coffee shop there. For the record, a full house of Orient community residents were here today to listen to this and probably to express their own views. There was significant opposition and in fact the Health Department, because of the opposition, required the Ehrlich property to covenant that it must only operate a dry use. Despite the business zoning, we cannot do food preparation on that site. There are covenants to that effect, and that was all part of the Health Department record, and I believe it's already in your file because I submitted it in the past. Finally, number 14 is a copy of the cross -easement that I had provided previously, but included as part of this packet to back up what I am saying. In reviewing Section 101-52(?) which is your obligation, we have addressed the site plan issues that are part of the Code; the Board has, as I have said before, very rigorously held us to these requirements, and we have obtained, and it's in your file, NYS DOT. So traffic access, which is the first issue that you should look at, has been addressed. The cross -easement has been provided for future site plan of Candy Man. Interior circulation: we have provided Mr. Mapes' certification of interior circulation. I will remind the Board that from prior site plan designs that were submitted, we had offered additional parking spaces that would allow for either dedicated employee parking or as a turn -around. Those were declined; it was preferred that we increase our buffer, and that's what we have done. So the latest is: we have the traffic circulation, we have the turnaround in through a certification, alternative plans have been proposed to this Board that you have rejected. Again, I point out that we have comparable businesses within 500' of this site which are much larger in their retail sales, much more intrusive to the neighbors in that they do not provide for any kind of buffers; they have no handicapped spaces, and we have provided everything. Las aping screening: again, that has been addressed in the site plan. We have provided a double row of evergreens with a 6' high fence. We agreed, and in our site plan we have preserved the existing mature trees; we want to keep that, it enhances the value of the property. Lighting is already shown on the site plan and it is screened. There is no intercom or exterior type of noise production here. Again, these are individuals coming to see a little shop, enjoying and hopefully buying something. There is no grading proposed on this property, there is drainage certainly already provided for in the site plan. Public utilities already exist. The Health Department has approved this site plan as well. El • Southold Town Planning Board Page Twelve March 13, 2006 I would remind the Board that as far as comprehensive development, this property is business zoned and has been business zoned for at least the last 20 years. I didn't go back to the prior zoning, but certainly for the last 20 years, it has been business zoning. The architectural features have been preserved; the outside of the building has not changed. We have provided for handicapped access, which is one of the last items listed in the site plan requirements. At this point, I am sure you will entertain lots of questions. I'll stand aside, but I thank you and I hope that you will all give us fair treatment here. I know you are under a great deal of pressure given the number of residents that are here in the community. Mr. Ehrlich has been fair with this Board, has repeatedly tried to meet every condition, every obligation and every request that has been made of him. We merely ask you to approve the site plan at this point. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Before we take comments, I just want to note that we have approximately 30 letters in our file, and one of them has asked that the letter be referenced and read at this hearing. I will say that this is reflective of the letters that we have in our packet. I will read that at this point and then we'll turn it open to the public. "Dear Board Members: have you ever been to an auction? I have, and the first thing that you notice is people, lots of them milling about and competing to purchase objects. An auction thrives on volumes of people to bid up the price. The property in question is '/, of an acre with parking for about 8 cars. Ten people cannot make an auction. An auction house needs scores to be successful. Where are these people going to park? If the Planning Board approves use of this parcel as an auction house, it is accepting that there are two places where visitors can park. They can trespass on the neighboring properties (a crime, I believe), or they can park on the street. Let's examine two clear examples of street parking in the area. When neighboring religious institutions hold services, a Southold Town policeman is required to regulate traffic flow and ensure that attendees do not inadvertently block neighboring driveways. And this on sleepy Sunday mornings where traffic is minimal. How is it proposed to regulate the street parking on summer weekend evenings when auctions are most likely to be held? Is it proposed that the Town of Southold regularly pay for traffic policemen? Left to their own devices, auction house attendees would behave no differently from the second example of street side parking in the area. The mob scene at Orient Point of cars parked frequently for up to a mile back while their occupants busy themselves with other activities. But Orient Point is a dead end, not a busy intersection that the whole hamlet uses. The intersection's Main Road and Village Lane in Orient is the main point of ingress and egress to the village and bayside properties. It is not a dead end suitable for on -street parking but rather a heavily trafficked choke point for the hamlet. Extensive street side parking in the intersection would disrupt the busy traffic flow in and out of the village. In front of the property in question runs an increasingly popular and already quite dangerous bicycle path. Street parking would block usage of the bicycle path and force cyclists to veer into the car lanes. The eastbound car lane directly in front of the property supports thousands of cars daily hurrying to the Cross Sound Ferry and the Connecticut gambling casinos. Their impatience is legendary, and massive street side parking at a main intersection would C, Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirteen March 13, 2006 only increase the too -familiar sound of sirens racing to the scene of a traffic accident. Let's face it; this property might have been zoned for business in the 1980's, but given its postage -stamp parking, and the traffic realities of 2006, it is hard to see how it is viable as a retail location. The Town of Southold has over the years, by inaction or connivance, neither a happy thought, permitted this stretch of main road to serve primarily as a freeway for frenzied gamblers and New England travelers on their way out of town to the detriment of all Southold residents, and particularly those of us, including the owner of the property in question, who border the main road. For the Board to approve use of this property as an auction house would be the equivalent of burying its collective head in the sand. You are, after all, a Planning Board, sworn to anticipate and plan for the consequences of your approvals, not serve as a rubber stamp for the "neverland" fantasies of a frustrated property owner who took an economic risk in purchasing a non -viable commercial property. He is now looking to make the Town and his neighbors pay for his mistake. Creating such a precedent will support the argument of any property owner, myself included, who would appear before you to move for an exception or change due to "hardship." I am astounded that we have reached the stage of a final public hearing on this ill-conceived application and question the common sense of those who have approved it heretofore. Moreover, as a taxpayer, I do not wish to finance the litigation expenses and awards which will surely ensue payable by the Town of Southold in defense of negligence actions resulting from the inevitable traffic accidents and attendant human grief that will result from congesting an area that has no business being further stretched. I respectfully request that this letter be read at the referenced hearing. Yours truly, Edmond L. Papantonio" I will open the hearing to comments and questions from the floor. Kathleen Smith, 1725 Village Lane, Orient: Good evening. Thank you for the opportunity to come before the Board and speak. I have a letter I'd like to read, please, from Edward Webb, who is the President of the Oysterponds Historical Society. "The Oysterponds HistoricaN Society Board of Directors, representing its 600 members, continues to oppose, as stated in previous communications and testimony before the Southold Town Board, the use of the aforesaid property for commercial purposes. The legal questions regarding buffer zone adjoining and the residential area, inadequate parking, pedestrian safety, and the incursion of a commercial establishment upon a historic district, all speak against the latest use proposal. We anticipate that the Planning Board will proceed with due wisdom in assuring the protection of this hamlet as a treasured resource of the Town of Southold. Edward W. Webb" My name is Kathleen Smith, and I am also Vice President of the Oysterponds Historical Society. On May 21, 1976, the Dept. of Interior in Washington, which maintains the National Register of Historic Places, notified the Oysterponds Society that their years of hard work and dedication had at last resulted in the success of their application to have the Orient Historic District placed on the National Register of Historic Places. As you can imagine, extensive research was needed for this application and, as a result, Oysterponds Historical Society published this book, entitled "Historic Orient Villages." It gives capsulated histories of all the houses located in the new Orient Historic District. Among those houses is the property now owned by Mr. Ehrlich and the subject of my E Southold Town Planning Board Page Fourteen March 13, 2006 statement tonight. The first structure indicated on this site in 1860 was occupied by two seafaring men and their families: Captain William Hubbard, and David Edwards. Orient is an incredibly unique historic hamlet. A drive down Village Lane, and its surrounding area is indeed a step back in time. Its historic character is the reason people take a Sunday afternoon drive through the village, why so many of us are grateful that we own homes here, and why, we feel so strongly about having a business, antique store, auction house, art shop, etc. leads the way into the irreplaceable historic time capsule that is the Orient Historic District. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board? Al Mould: I live in Orient. I have a little trouble saying things, so be patient. This is a letter that I wrote to the Board. "Gentlemen: This letter concerns the application of Robert Ehrlich for a store at the entrance to Village Lane in Orient. The request should be turned down for several reasons. I am mainly concerned about safety. I live on Village Lane. A store at this location will create a serious traffic hazard. Entering Route 25 from Village Lane is already a challenge. To add a store at the corner will acerbate the situation. Village Lane is the heart of Orient's Historic District. A store at the entrance negates the meaning of one of the historic jewels in the Town of Southold. It will be in the best interest not only for those living on Village Lane, but also the Town of Southold, to consider a zone change of the property perhaps to residential. I hope that you will consider such a change and I thank you for your consideration of this problem. Thank you." Clyde Wachsberger: I live at 295 Village Lane and I would like to read a statement, but I also have a letter from one of my neighbors, which I will read in a moment. Before I read anything, I would like to say that I bought my property in 1983, and I can say from the bottom of my heart that not a day has gone by that I have not felt grateful and privileged to live on Village Lane. "Dear Board Members: There are fewer and fewer special places on this earth. Once one of these places is lost, it is lost forever. Village Lane in Orient is one of these unique places. It's a gorgeous picture postcard, unspoiled street running through the historic hamlet of Orient, lined with lovely homes, many of them centuries old. It's a quiet street with a slow pace. Neighbors are friendly but also entirely respectful of each other's privacy. Most importantly, the residents of Village Lane are respectful of the integrity of the Lane itself. We respect its long history, we are respectful of its quiet nature, and we love our street. The entrance to this historic street is the intersection of Village Lane and the Main Road. There's the monument, a memorial to local soldiers lost in the Civil War, and the family names on the monument are still familiar. Directly opposite is one of the oldest trees on the North Fork, the buttonwood tree, at the entrance to Young's Road. A plaque on the tree states it was growing there when the Declaration of Independence was signed. The homes on the four corners of this intersection are all quiet residences. If one of these homes on this intersection becomes a business, the unique nature and character of Orient will change forever. It will never again be the same. Something wonderful, something unique, something special will be lost forever. Don't let this happen on your watch. Let future generations be grateful and lucky that you, in 2006, made something Southold Town Planning Board Page Fifteen March 13, 2006 wonderful happen: that you helped preserve a unique historic spot for posterity to enjoy. Let Village Lane continue unspoiled for another century. Thank you." I would like to read this letter from Tony Just, who is my neighbor. Tony & Elizabeth Payton live just north of me on Village Lane. This was written by Tony Just, and he requested that I read this: "I am writing to request that the Planning Board turn down the request to operate a commercial venture at the corner of Village Lane and Main Road in Orient. In addition, I would ask the Town Board to rezone this property back to its previous residential zoning, as well as the other mixed -use properties at the entrance to Village Lane. These properties are too small to operate adequately as commercial businesses. Furthermore, as a resident whose property is in close proximity to the proposed gift shop, I can attest to the dangerous driving conditions which exist at the intersection of Village Lane and Main Road which could only be aggravated by the addition of a site business with inadequate parking. The present application compromises the two neighboring residential properties because of the small size of these lots. Therefore, the required buffer of 25' cannot possibly exist in addition to sufficient parking or turnaround space for parking. Addressing the zoning issues of this property is urgently required. Protect the people who live near this property as well as the entire Orient community from single-minded business plans that insufficiently address the buildings they are proposed for, the neighborhoods they are located in, and the future of our community. Sincerely, Tony Just, 195 Village Lane, Orient." I do have just a couple of questions, I guess I address them to you and the questions are about how this business might change the nature of the intersection. According to the proposal, I believe the sign will be a 5' circle mounted on the building in the second floor windows. According to the Town Code on signage, the sign should be as low to the ground as possible. My question is: why is the sign specified for the second story; couldn't it be lower? Also, the Code states the sign should be as small as practical: is a 5' circle necessary? The Code has additional stipulations about color. Have all of the characteristics of this proposed sign been approved by the Architectural Review Board? Will the sign be lit at night? Will the building itself be lit at night? Will there be any other freestanding signage on the property and, if so, where? And will any additional signage be lit at night? Chairperson Woodhouse: Well? Pat Moore: Do you want me to answer these things as they come up, or...? Chairperson Woodhouse: Would you like to answer some of those questions? We could answer some, but I think you might have more information. Pat Moore: Sure. OK. The site plan was prepared by Mike Mapes; he knows it even better than I do. Chairperson Woodhouse: And this is Miss Moore speaking. Southold Town Planning Board Page Sixteen March 13, 2006 Pat Moore: Yes, and I have Mike Mapes, who is the engineer who prepared the site plan. So you can remind me about the lighting on the property? Mike Mapes: The only lighting that's on the property is up on the building, and they only illuminate the parking areas, one at the west side of the building and one at the rear. And they are shielded so that they only light up the parking areas. The sign is not going to be illuminated on the front of the building, and there will be no other signs in the front yard, and there is no other lighting illuminating the building itself, as well. Pat Moore: Other than obviously simple entrance lights: what any home might have. Thank you, Mike. Chairperson Woodhouse: I guess there was a question about the size or the height. Pat Moore: The placement of the sign? Chairperson Woodhouse: Yes. Mike Mapes: We submitted that to the Architectural Review Committee and we didn't get any comments back. Chairperson Woodhouse: It was seen by the ARC and they did not have a problem with the sign when they saw the application. Pat Moore: No. In fact, we had a color rendering of the sign at the time. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Jane Smith: I live at 1750 Platt Road in Orient. I have a letter of mine that I would like to read and I also have a letter that Marianne Weil asked me to read. She is teaching at Stony Brook and couldn't be here. First, this is my letter that I wrote to the Town Board: "I am writing to urge the Town Board to return the Ehrlich property at the corner of Village Lane and the Main Road in Orient to its more proper residential zone. It is inconceivable that this property might be a retail establishment for the following reasons: safety - this is already a fairly dangerous intersection because of the offset of Young's Road and because it is so heavily traveled. The Main Road curves at this spot and visibility for people turning is a problem. It is also on the path for school children and traffic to the beach. Cars parked along Main Road would obscure the oncoming traffic even further. Certainly cars will park on the road, because parking facility is inadequate. I live on Platt Road, and coming out of Platt Road to turn left has become extremely dangerous recently because of parking on the main road. So I now train myself to go around the other way. The other reason in my letter is the future — granting this application for an antique/craft gift shop would leave open a future possibility of regaining a liquor license or, if possible, expanded business. This could ultimately destroy the entire character of the Village of Orient. Please give careful consideration to the voices of the residents of Orient." Southold Town Planning Board Page Seventeen March 13, 2006 This is Marianne Weil's letter signed by Marianne Weil and Diane Bratcher: "To the Planning Board: We are writing to express our opposition to the opening and operation of an art gallery and auction house business on the corner of Village Lane and Route 25 in the Hamlet of Orient, New York, by Mr. Ehrlich. Our home is on Young's Road, less than 300' from this proposed business. Orient is a very quiet hamlet, with most businesses closed by 5:30 p.m. Mr. Ehrlich's business will have long operating hours, during which he will use amplified sound, generate noise, garbage, traffic and sewage. Most properties in this neighborhood are residential and use well water. It is extremely unsafe to operate a public restroom in such a neighborhood. In addition, the proposed site for this business is a particularly dangerous intersection. Most local businesses seldom have more than a few cars or trucks at their busiest moments. Mr. Ehrlich's art gallery and auction house will have pick-up and delivery trucks as well as considerable auto traffic. The traffic congestion of cars entering and leaving directly onto a busy state road already overburdened with heavy ferry traffic, the noise, trash and additional sewage this business will create are significant reasons for the Planning Board to deny a business permit to Mr. Ehrlich. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Marianne Weil and Diane Bratcher." Chairperson Woodhouse: Would you like to submit those letters? I guess if you leave them on the table we could pick them up. I just want to clarify; I believe that the hours of operation proposed were 8-6? Is that true, Ms. Moore? Bruno Semon: No. 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Chairperson Woodhouse: OK. Thank you. Could I ask that if a point you want to make has already been brought up that, and if you have it in a letter or something, you don't need to restate that point, but just if you want to bring new information to our attention that would help make sure everybody has a chance to speak. Charles Dean: I live on Phillips Lane. I think my letter does address something that's not been (inaudible); it does talk about the buffer zone, but I'm very specific, I talk about a point that hasn't been really addressed, do you mind if I read it? Chairperson Woodhouse: Just say it to us. Charles Dean: Well, OK. The major paragraph is, and then I'll put the letter up: "Does living near Mr. Ehrlich rely on the buffer zone requirement to protect their property values and the residential nature of the area from the destruction that a busy business would wreak. The express purpose of the 25' buffer zone rule is to preserve the privacy and the enjoyment of using one's residential property without exhaust fumes and bright car headlines and ugly asphalt and gravel at the property line. So, what about the rights of Mr. Ehrlich's neighbors? And especially, what about the rights of the Constant Family and the King Family whose properties abut Mr. Ehrlich's proposed parking lot? The King Family have owned their small property, which is only 57' X 70', long before Mr. Ehrlich's property was rezoned commercial in 1988. The 6' fence that Mr. Ehrlich proposes to run down the shared property line, will stand approximately 20' from the back of their home, creating a claustrophobic effect. The lovely residential nature of 0 Southold Town Planning Board Page Eighteen March 13, 2006 that part of Orient will be ruined forever. The buffer zone rule is designed to protect the citizens of this community from just this sort of abuse. I well understand that there are times when an established rule can have unintended and unfortunate consequences necessitating a variance in the interest of the greater public good. But the community of Orient overwhelmingly opposes this application, and there is no compelling public interest in approving a variance. So, it is entirely appropriate for the town government, as our representatives, to declare the rules by which our community is governed will be enforced. The citizens of Orient expect, and we deserve, no less." And I go on, but I'll stop there. I think it is very important that our rules be enforced, and those of us who live near this property are relying on you to enforce them. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Charles Dean: I have a number of questions about what they are going to be doing in terms of...... Chairperson Woodhouse: Well, if you'd like to ask your questions.... (to next person) could you just wait, you could just stand there if you don't mind, comfortably, or sit down, and he'll finish his questions. Charles Dean: There has been some, just earlier, Mrs. Moore said that there's a woman who's going to be running a retail shop, she said is here. And another time she referred to it as a retail shop. But they are asking for it to be an auction house, an art gallery, and a workshop. I just was wondering what kind of gifts or things are you proposing to actually sell. If Mr. Ehrlich or Mrs. Moore could tell us what is going to be the product, the gifts, that are going to be sold at this store? Pat Moore: Would you like me to try to answer that? Chairperson Woodhouse: OK. ,Rat:Moore: There seems to be a little bit of confusion with respect to the description, the title. TUus is a gift shop. A gift ,Shop ,under a generic terra, can sell all types of things, We propose, art, antiques, and auction gallery. If a person, Mr. Ehrlich is here and he said, for example: he has antique books. If they become, as far as by private auction, this is not going to be an auction house where it's like Christie's. OK, that's not what is here. We are limited by the square footage of what we have here. We are proposing under 600 sq. ft. in sales area. So, understandably, it's limited in its scope. You have art, you have old books, I'm trying to think of other things, knick-knacks, Orient crafts, artists, local artists, local craftspeople. Charles Dean: You're going to be selling work by local artists? Pat Moore: That's the goal. Charles Dean: Have you approached any local artists about this? I mean, are you, does he have other art galleries? Is he dealing in art? Is this something, does he.... Southold Town Planning Board Pape Nineteen March 13, 2006 Pat Moore: No, that's why Ms. Herzwig will be operating it, because she's familiar with that. Charles Dean: I've been out here for over a decade, and you know I've seen many art shops, art galleries and gift shops in Greenport, which is a very busy town, lots of street traffic, lots of people coming there as a destination because of the bus and the train. Most of them have failed. It's not very easy. Pat Moore: The market will dictate that. Charles Dean: The market in Orient, a quiet little town, I mean..... Chairperson Woodhouse: OK, OK, could we..... Pat Moore: I don't mean to have this as an exchange, but look to the west by 500' and you have the Little House. How have they survived the past two years, selling similar items. Charles Dean: Are you going to be selling any food products at all? I mean are there going to be any edible products? Pat Moore: I can't give you specifics of everything that's going to be there. But you cannot sell prepared food products. Can I say jams? Charles Dean: Can you sell jams? Pat Moore: That's not prohibited, obviously. There are local manufacturers of jam. Charles Dean: Does that go under art? Pat Moore: It's under gifts. Charles Dean: So is it a retail gift shop? Pat Moore: It's a gift shop, nothing more than a gift shop. The definition for parking purposes; there is no definition of a gift shop in our zoning code. We can tell you what predominantly we will sell is art, antiques and items that can be for private auction, items they have access to from all different aspects of contacts. You might have something where you have a very unique item and it's put as far as an auction nowadays with the internet, you have individuals where you get a bidding in a sense on a valuable piece of whatever it might be. That's what we are talking about, nothing more. Charles Dean: So the artwork that Mr. Ehrlich plans to sell, is this all Wd* madeby an individual person, or is this mass-produced artwork, I mean it could be..... Pat Moore: I don't think: it's something that even matters.... Southold Town Planning Board Page Twentv Chairperson Woodhouse: Excuse me, I think we need to... March 13, 2006 Pat Moore: OK. I do have a particular question; we need to screen the questions a little bit. Chairperson Woodhouse: Until I hear it, I don't know what it is, but I think you were asking for clarification as to how the shop, the proposed shop, was going to operate. Charles Dean: Exactly. And I'm still confused. I mean now is the shop going to be selling jam, tea...... Chairperson Woodhouse: OK I think that we, could we, let's see what other questions come up and maybe in a response something will be clarified. I think you stated that... Zat Moore: It's a typical little gift shop. Nothing more. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Now there is someone who has patiently waited. Thank you so much. Frances Demarest: I was born and brought up on a large farm at Orient Point. Presently, I live on the main highway. I get all the boat traffic, and can't get out of my yard. Now, I live exactly halfway between the Point and the Village. I go to the Village every single day. By the grace of God, I missed that horrible accident on Main Road by about five minutes. When I leave the Village Lane, I come up Oysterponds Lane and I shook my head and the last car wrecked pulled off by the Brown House. There were two other vehicles in that accident, and there were serious injuries. We do not need any more traffic on the main highway. I have my older sister, pushing 93 this month, who lives on Young's Road. You get down to the Buttonwood Tree, you have to get out on the shoulder in order to see east and west before you enter the highway. I do it every single day, because I visit my sister. If coming out on Young's Road you have these trees, it's the old Couch House and I don't know the gentleman who lives right on the Main Road; it's the very last house at Young's Road. The reason you have to get out on the shoulder is just after you go past John Tuthill's home and you go by Mrs. Rose's home, it is a bad curve. If you're not out that far, you can't see the vehicles coming. Now, I come up every day to the Village. I put my arrow light on, I'm making a left turn. All these vehicles in back of me pass on my right hand side. At the dead end of Young's Road there's a well that catches the water that comes down. And if I make a left hand turn, I still have to be careful because I have to look at what's coming east. Now I can see no reason why this gentleman, who I have never met, should take a residential home that we are desperate for in our community. People need homes. We do not need another business. And I hope the Board will look into all of these items, and try to handle some of them. Now one of the worst things that I approached one of the Boards years ago and I asked them if there wasn't some way Southold Town could get the State to put up "No Passing" signs east of Orient Point. The Village School. And No Passing past the monument until you get past that curve. We should have "No Passing" signs from east of the school until you get west of John Tuthill's house. E Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -One March 13, 2006 Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you very much. Mr. Constant? Douglas Constant: I live at 555 Village Lane. Before I read my statement to the Board, I would like to point out Southold Town Code 100-202, which is General Design Principles. You might want to talk to the people on the Architectural Review Board. It says "Decisions by sign applicants shall be guided by the following general principles: (a) signs should be subordinate part of the streetscape; (b) signs should be as small as practicable; (c) signs should be as close to the ground as possible, with required safety and legibility considerations. Garish colors and materials should be avoided." I don't know how they passed that. In 2004, the Planning Board, then chaired by Mr. Orlowski, met at 2254 Main Road in Orient. At that time the Board told Mr. Ehrlich that the site did not have enough area for parking and was at a dangerous intersection. In spite of that meeting, the west side of the property was stripped of trees and plantings and the garage was demolished. The total area of this property is .28 acre. When the 25' required transition buffer area is created along the King and Constant lot lines, there is, as the 2004 Planning Board opined, not enough area for parking. In a previous life, I was selected to serve; as a negotiator for the Southold Faculty Association and I participated in negotiating four multi -year contracts between our faculty association and various school boards. Often both sides at the table would wrestle with language. The type that would allow for interpretation and the type that was undeniably narrow. In Section 100-213, we read language that leaves no room for interpretation. In the sentence "such buffer shall comply with at least the following minimum standards," the word "shall" means "must." The words at least mean "at a minimum," and minimum means "not less than." For general business zones, the minimum transition buffer area is 25', and the site plan as proposed to you, shows buffers of 13.4' and 14.5'. 1 demand that the Town of Southold maintain the standards that are codified and provide us with as much protection as possible. In addition, we see in the site plan, 572 sq. ft. of sales area and another 941 sq. ft. of storage area. I have been an antiques dealer since 1978. 1 rented two storefronts on Main Street in Greenport. The rear areas of both stores had storage areas. We regularly sold antiques to retail customers from that portion of our shop. Everything was for sale always. In Section 100-191, we see parking requirements for antique shop, auction gallery: one 250 sq. ft. sales area, arts & crafts shop, workshop. The most problematic of these sited uses is auction gallery. If the property is used for consignments and seats, where do patrons park? In a general business zone, the Planning Board cannot waive any portion of these requirements. Since one parking place for 250 sq. ft. of sales area is the most liberal requirement for any business listed in Section 100-191, it seems to me that the sales area, storage area designation is just a ruse to finally acquire a certificate of occupancy for a business at this location. Clearly, this property is unsuitable for retail sales. Deny the application; do not let the genie out of the bottle. Chairperson Woodhouse: Yes, sir? And please make sure to sign your names on the sheets. The next person who wants to speak, somebody else could come up and sign their name on this side ,and wait. Edwin Richard Constant: People call me "Rick." I am 63, and am semi -retired, and I'd like to read this letter of my future plans. I think it's important for the Board to know. Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Two March 13, 2006 "As an owner of the property at 200 Village Lane, Orient, my future retirement residence, my garage and property lines are directly behind the Ehrlich property. We in fact share property lines on three different sides. I want to set forth the reasons why I am opposed to the business/businesses on the corner of Village Lane and Route 25. First and foremost in my own mind is that of road safety. Even though I see on the site plan the provision for entrance and exit, in reality, I expect that road safety would be compromised by multiple vehicles entering and exiting. Even with the normal weekday flow of Route 25 traffic, let alone weekend summer volume. I have also seen the provisions for a delivery vehicle. What about multiple delivery vehicles? What about the hours of delivery and the coordination of the deliveries impeding traffic? What provisions are there for trash and refuse removal? For that truck, the garbage truck, and the hours for that action to take place? What provisions are being made for garbage removal itself'? I am sure there will be cartons and packaging material to be disposed of. This is another aspect of road safety. What happens when automobile and garbage truck conflict on the entrance or exit on that busy corner. Will the timing of trash removal be in an hour that prevents me from sleeping or wakes me at an inappropriate time? After all, there is a dumpster shown on that site plan. What provisions have been made for overflow parking? When the parking spaces are occupied, does that mean that overflow parking is on the remaining grass buffer? Is the overflow plan for Route 25, or is it planned for Village Lane? Where does the overflow go? I also noticed when driving east or west on 25, how would you know when the parking spaces are full; how would you know that you had to go to an overflow area? That leads me to my second point, which does affect me personally. That is the so- called buffer that is to protect the quality of life of a residence, when immediately against a business property. Why is it not 25'? Is this showing some sort of favoritism towards the business owner? I think that I should have the same rights as he has. It is my understanding that the parking space is dictated by square footage of retail space. It is also my understanding that in this case, the buffer is being reduced to allow the business sufficient space for parking. This modification to the Code to suit the business owner certainly in my opinion is not treating me, the resident, fairly. I also want to note that the proposed site plan does not allow for the maintenance of my garage showing with the fence and tree line going along the property line. If anything, I think as a homeowner that fence and tree line should be along the edge of the parking area, not at the edge of his buffer against my property. I still feel without the fence, the grass area of that buffer will be a temptation as an additional parking space or two. Now my third and last point I want to make is that this multi -faceted business would be the gateway to Orient, a mostly residential area where, although there are two other businesses, they are of a different scale and location on Route 25. 1 should add that they are a lot less intrusive on my quality of life, especially for this future retiree, and Orient. By the way, is the sound system still installed? I happened to be there at 200 Village Lane shortly after the installation when it was tested. And I also wonder if the food preparation equipment is still in the building. All of these questions that remain unanswered, and the other points I mentioned, is the reason why I am opposed to this business on the corner of Route 25 (as I said, the gateway to Orient) and Village Lane next to that Civil War Monument. In closing, I do thank you for listening to my points where I oppose this business and I thank you for your service. 0 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Three March 13, 2006 Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Edwin Blesch: I'm from 45 Youngs Road in Orient. Edwin Constant is the only other Edwin I have known in my life. Coming here this evening in the fog, I was reminded of a play that I used to teach by Eugene O'Neill called "Long Day's Journey Into Night," in which there's a line by the younger brother, "Stammering is the native eloquence of us fog people." And that's what I feel we're all in tonight, we have very different points of view and we're stammering in trying to deliver them to you. I came to Orient only a quarter of a century ago, and my home is still called the Petty Homestead; I'm directly across the street from Mr. Ehrlich's property. That to me seems to be one key to the nature of change in Orient. Two hundred and some odd years on, my home's name is not my name, but an owner of 200 years ago. I've looked at over 200 houses in four states and I finally found one in a hamlet in which I intuitively wanted to live in. I love this place. My realtor, Betty Hornhorst of (Real Estate Company) in Cutchogue, showed me a handyman's special and fixer -upper, an early Dutch gamble roof colonial I could barely afford on my teacher's salary. But I saw its potential and I made the stretch. I remember asking Betty about the advisability of investing in a residence so near a business, the business there being the Candy Man. As she promised, however, the Candy Man has been a good neighbor and has never interfered with the quality of my life. At the time, the house across the street, now Mr. Ehrlich's, was in terrible disrepair and frankly quite an eyesore. But the two large rambling Victorians on the other two corners were surely impressive, and I determined to make mine respectable also, and I think I have:. I hoped someone eventually would lift up the remaining one. You can imagine my joy when the fourth corner was finally improved by the former owners, the Mudds. Twice, in fact: once before a disastrous fire, and once after. All four corners now had the properties to be proud of as a major intersection of and entrance to an historic hamlet. Sometime in the late 1980's, the Town of Southold rezoned the property as Business, without the knowledge or input of any of us neighbors. But its use remained residential. Four years ago, just this week, an article broke in the Suffolk Times informing us of a new "coffee shop" to be opening on the property. Worried about the financial repercussions of yet another business possibly lowering my investment: values, I took notice. And you know I have written many letters to you over the years about this. To my knowledge, Mr. Ehrlich had asked the Building Department only for a residential renovation. How could he open a coffee shop? Before long, a State Liquor License was issued. Then there was talk of live music on site, and still no business status. The Liquor License was revoked; now we hear of a gift shop, an art gallery, whatever. What I want to know is what future possibilities, what future incarnations could open there after this one, if it is allowed, to be changed to Business Zoning. Of course Mr. Ehrlich has his rights for his investment. Surely he must have consulted with his lawyers and done some market study of viability of the kinds of businesses he! could propose for his property. He still has other options: a two-family house, as some of you pointed out earlier. We all know that our area needs such. As it stands, Mr. Ehrlich's venture could impact negatively and financially on the eight surrounding properties. It seems to me that to heed only Mr. Ehrlich's wishes and neglect those of his neighbors and the hamlet in fact at large, would be prejudicial. I strongly feel that the Town made a big mistake in 1988 when it surreptitiously rezoned Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Four March 13, 2006 the property from residential to business. It must repair that lack of foresight and judgment. It must not protect the collective good of not just one businessman, but of many neighbors who have substantial investments at stake as well. We'd be crazy not to bellyache. Thank you. Freddie Wachsberger: I'm wearing two hats tonight: as you know I am President of Southold Citizens for Safe Roads, but I am also representing the Orient Association tonight because Ann Hopkins, the President, was not able to be here. Before I address the particular safe roads questions that many people have addressed, I just want to add a couple of observations to it. Obviously, I think we are all confused about what this shop is actually supposed to be. If it's supposed to be a gift shop, why isn't it called a gift shop? Why is it called all these other things? What I wonder is if it's because in 100-191 of the Zoning Code, a retail shop, which this is now today professed to be, requires one parking space per every 200 sq. ft. of gross area, not just sales area, and my thought is that as this plan is presently submitted, it does not meet that standard. Am I correct? I might be wrong about that. The second thing I want to observe: everybody has talked about the 25' buffer that obviously is extremely important. Although it has been mentioned that maybe there are other places where this buffer has not been enforced, I know you all have copies of this that I gave you, this is a slightly enlarged one and I gave it to you to talk about traffic, but this aerial view shows very clearly how incredibly close these adjoining residential properties are, how small all these properties, how close together they are, and it's a case where, when we talk about a 25' buffer at some large automobile sales room or something, is a little different from a 25' buffer here. It's absolutely essential that a 25' buffer be maintained in this very close quarters configuration of houses that are so close to this business. It's not as though you have vast amounts of space and people way back, you know, a house on two acres or something. These are houses on tiny lots very close together, and we feel it's essential that zone codes like the 25' buffer need to be maintained. The other thing I wanted to mention, and I am sure you know this, but it's worth mentioning anyway, that I've been involved in this particular succession of application since the original coffee house/liquor license stuff, and obviously it's gone through a succession of proposals trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, and it won't fit at all, simply because this should never have been zoned business. But, I have been following what has been happening in Seaciff, which has been a related situation going back to the coffee house proposal. And so I suppose you know that there is a possibility that you'll be sued even if you were to approve this application, because that's what happened in Seacliff. Mr. Ehrlich is actually suing the mayor, the village attorney, the board of trustees, zoning board of appeals, and planning board as well as their members, for a total of $90 million; not because the application was denied, but because there were limits put on the application. For example: parking restrictions, limits on hours of operation, and attempts to regulate the food sales. So, we have no assurance, even if the application were approved with all those restrictions, that they would be maintained, and you have no assurance that if you pass the application you wouldn't be sued anyway, but we urge you nonetheless to do the right thing: support the zoning code, OK? 0 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Five March 13, 2006 Now, just to put on my hat for a minute of Southold Citizens for Safe Roads, and everybody has mentioned that this is a dangerous corner, that's one of the reasons why the conversion to business zone was so inappropriate, not only because of the inadequacy of the inability to support a 25' buffer, but also because this is a very peculiar intersection. And people have mentioned that. And I think the blowups, and you have copies of this, make it very clear. What I've done though on this one, because, we travel in Maine a lot, and you know we like to stop at antique shops or gift shops and we say, oh let's just pull over and run in and see what's going on. Mostly, you know they have, because Maine is big and open, great big parking areas you can pull into. But, you can imagine driving up to someplace, seeing a sign and saying let's stop for a minute, I'll wait in the car, why don't you run in and see what they have. They're not going to pull into a parking lot; they're going to stay on the road. The same thing for United Parcel; have you ever seen a United Parcel man pull into your driveway? They only deliver in the afternoon; the same for Fedex: 1:00, 2:00. They're not gonna pull into a driveway, they're gonna stop on the road. What I've done here, and I will leave these f'or you, is just ask you to imagine if there are cars just casually parked on the road here, with the already mentioned visual impairment that's caused by two ancient monuments that aren't going to go anywhere, they're not going to be removed: a Civil War Monument and the Buttonwood Tree, at an intersection that doesn't meet straight. Where, if you're coming out to Village Lane and you want to go over to Young's Road, you don't just drive up, you have to make a caddy -corner across the road here. This is an intersection where repeatedly cars going to the ferry are passing across the yellow line, you're turning right and turning left at different places on this road. This is an intersection that is crossed every day twice by school children walking to the school; it is crossed constantly by people on bicycles and children crossing to go up Young's Road to the public beach. This is a very dangerous intersection; it was when this zoning code was changed, it's increased exponentially because of the ferry traffic that we know has created enormous danger. The only other thing I want to say a Ipropos of traffic, and I have a question about this because in relationship to the DOT and the DOT signing off on this application. This is in the historic district, and my understanding was that in fact the only regulations that are enforced in the case of the historic district is the impact as far as State action on the road. I will look into and see whether the DOT has actually taken into consideration in its approval of curb cut, the fact that this house is in the historic district. I think that's all I have to say. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Pat Moore: If I could just respond to a few things before they get too far, if you don't mind. Margaret Minichini: Actually, if I could just make two points; I need to get my daughter home tonight. Pat Moore: OK. Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Six March 13, 2006 Margaret Minichini: I live in Orient. I was the Chair of the Stakeholders Hamlet Committee that met last year and made recommendations in Orient on the development or potential development in Orient. Two points that I'd just like to make: one is that the Hamlet Stakeholders did not address rezoning any properties when we looked at the hamlet business district or when we looked at the area around the hamlet business district. We did that because we did not want to, we didn't feel that we would like to be in a position of having an adverse affect on a property owner's position if their property was zoned commercial. However, we did that with the expectation also that a property owner would not have an adverse impact on his neighbor's property as well, and I think that's something the Board needs to take into consideration in this situation, is whether the neighboring properties will have some adverse affect being that closely connected to business property. The other issue that the Stakeholders were very adamant about was that maintaining the entranceway to the Village of Orient, that the Village of Orient as a special place coming off of the causeway into the town, needed to be maintained as the residential area that it was and that it should by all means be a welcoming way into an historic residential area. So I hope the Board would take those two points into consideration: that was the feeling of the Stakeholders. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Ms. Moore, you asked to respond to some things. Pat Moore: Yes, I think that some.... and I'll remind you as far as legal theory is conclusory allegations made by the public which I think are unfounded and unsupported, certainly by this application. The first point is with respect to traffic: the DOT did review this. It took it for quite some time, had us make some revisions, and this has been approved by the New York State Department of Transportation since it's a state route. With regard to Ms. Wachsberger's comments, if you just look at photograph 1b, you see what is obviously a privet hedge. If the State does not want parking along the road, they have the ability to restrict parking along the road. We cannot control illegal acts by people who park or choose not to enter into parking spaces and want to run in, run out. That will happen regardless of what efforts are made by any property owner or business owner to provide adequate parking. But here we have even greater protection against that, in that there is a privet hedge that runs the entire length of the corner, and therefore anybody who tries to park there's really inadequate space there unless they're in the State Highway in the median, and that's really up to the State. But certainly we've made every effort to direct pedestrian traffic, I know that was the subject of a work session where we were very careful because we anticipate that most of our visitors are going to be visitors to Candy Man and to The Little House, and that they will share customers. We may have a customer who comes into my client's business and then walks over to the Candy Man and then walks over to The Little House. That's how these businesses tend to operate. So, I just wanted to clarify those allegations, those conclusions that are drawn that really are unfounded: not based on certainly what is in front of you. 0 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Seven March 13, 2006 With respect to what is going on in Seacliff, I would object to any reference to that: I don't know what's going on in Seacliff, you don't know what's going on in Seacliff; and again, to paint my client as a bad owner, litigious individual, I think that anybody who buys a commercial property, and let's remind ourselves, this is business -zoned property. All the comments that have been made with respect to what they wish it was: it is a business -zoned property. t '' isms p: A ;wilF► oeepect to 0% ide"Wying feeitn'es the ehe� tic alwayw-chawrt_on ik►ie aiic 1!4M- f L e o A deli is a retail shop. There are generic descriptions, definitions in the Code, and that is why we stepped away from that and said "that is not what we're doing here, we're doing a gift shop; what is our gift shop going to sell? Antiques, crafts, arts." That's what we are going to sell. We have limitations in preparation of food; we cannot prepare food there. So any allegation with respect to what a prior application was about is completely inappropriate in this discussion. You have before you an application and we ask you to review it for what it is, not for what it might be or what someone might want to do with it. We have something before you. There's code enforcement: that's the mechanism. You have ability to inspect properties that have gone through site plan; you do it all the time. I've sat here and you've reviewed site plans that get modified that people do things differently. That's what you do. Let's give Mr. Ehrlich the right to present to you something he's planning to do and you have to follow the Code with respect to reviewing it. Now, I'll remind you also that Mr. Constant pointed out a section of the Code; I would also point out another paragraph of the Code in that same section, which says that essentially, landscaping, earth and berm, walls, fence of a location, height, design and materials approved by the Planning Board may be accepted for any portion of the required planting or buffer area. We have presented to you from day one, alternative to 25'. It's obvious this property, as well as 90% of the properties you review, do not have the size under the Code to provide 25' buffers. I've given you the photographs intentionally with that in mind because you can see for yourself right within 500' of this property that they too do not comply with that. It's a question of reasonableness. We have offered the double row of evergreens. We have offered the 6' high fence. If the Kings do not want a fence, we're happy not to provide a fence. If they don't want one, we're happy to work with our neighbor. These are requirements to satisfy you; these are requirements that you recommended in order to meet the purposes of the Code, which is to shield from light, from noise and the activity of a retail use, of a business use adjacent to a residence. That's what has been put on there. I want to offer something that we had Mr. Mapes prepare, which I don't know if it will satisfy anybody here, because their mind has been made up for a while. With respect to the buffer; the evergreens, the 5-6' high Leland Cypress which have been proposed on the site plan, if the Planning Board felt that placing the evergreen that is closest to the fence slightly on a mounded area, no berm, because it's impractical. But if you had the fence and a slight mounding of first the back row of the evergreens, and then you had the front row of the evergreens, we offer that certainly to try to appease the 0 Southold Town Planning Board Page Twenty -Eight March 13, 2006 concerns of the neighbors. We really work to try to accommodate and to react to the objections. We offer this as well; it's up to the Board. We would certainly accept it as a condition of any approval. But we've reached a point where we've redrawn the Site Plan so many times. It's something we offer to the Board, if that's something you want. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Charles Dean: I just have a question: Ms. Moore, what would prevent people from just parking on this grass, you have an area of grass between the parking lot and the trees. What's to prevent someone from pulling into the parking lot, say there's nowhere to park, and they just pull onto the grass. Pat Moore: I think in practical, in the sense that they're, we have to control it to a certain extent, because that's how our sprinklers, I think there's actually a water, is there a well or sprinkler head there already? If people start parking on that grass there, they're going to destroy, our irrigation. So I don't think it's in my client's..... Charles Dean: Another thing, Ms. Moore, you said that you can't stop people from parking on the Main Road, and neither can the State. Michael Mapes: DOT is requiring us to post a sign on the west side of the property that no one can park from that point to the corner. And that is on the site plan. Chairperson Woodhouse: OK. And could I just ask if there is anyone who has not had a chance to speak, that you speak first before we have people come back up. We do need to move things along, we have some other hearings and people who are here for those as well. Pat Moore: OK. I just needed to clarify those issues right away. Thank you. Karen Constant: I live at 555 Village Lane in Orient, and I'd like to read a letter on behalf of Claudia King-Ramone. You have a copy of this letter, dated February 21, but I just want it to become part of the public record: "Dear Members of the Board: I am writing to you in regards to the upcoming public hearing to be held in March in regards to the Ehrlich property which borders our family home at 130 Village Lane in Orient. Unfortunately, I will be traveling out of the country and will not be able to attend the meeting. However, I did want to express my concerns to the Board in writing with regard to potential commercial development of the property adjacent to our house. This past week, I visited the location and was disappointed to see that the Town had allowed the owner of the adjacent property to raze trees, grass, and an outbuilding that had provided some privacy and quiet between the two properties. In their place, a gravel parking lot/driveway has been laid right up the edge of our property line. We are aware that the Town requires by law a buffer zone of 25' between a commercial parking lot and the property line of a private residence. If the Town is to allow the owner of the property to move forward with his plan to open a business at that location, we ask that you at least require him to abide by this law. Otherwise, we are concerned that traffic, headlights and noise emanating from the business will quickly degrade the quality of life E Southold Town Planning Board Pape Twenty -Nine March 13, 2006 on our property. Please contact me directly with any further questions that you may have. Sincerely, Claudia J. King-Ramone. " Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone else who hasn't spoken who'd like to address the Board on this matter? Karen Braziller: I live on Village Lane. I have a statement to make for myself and also for my neighbor, who is at 690 Village Lane. Every time I come over the causeway into Orient, whether I've been on an errand in Greenport or far away for a long time, I am elated by the beauty, serenity and special-ness of this place, and I cannot believe how lucky I am to live in the beautiful village of Orient, surrounded by farm fields, within walking distance of both the sound and the bay. I am grateful to be able to walk down Village Lane at night, under a huge sky of stars, and hear only the sound of wind in the amazingly old and very large trees. I am grateful to live among neighbors who have chosen to live in Orient because it is tranquil and connected to history. But Orient is a very small place, and the village is only a few streets. It can easily be threatened and lost. Therefore, I strongly oppose the establishment of a commercial enterprise at the corner of Village Lane and the Main Road. I had a whole list of questions about light and sound and so forth: most of which have been mentioned by other people. So instead, I will leave my letter here for you. Instead of that, because I have listened to this whole hearing, I am now even more concerned about this application. Pat Moore, Mrs.. Moore, excuse me, stated earlier on that it was her hope and assumption that the Candy Man, the Little House and the Ehrlich business will all cooperate and become symbiotic. This raises an even greater concern for me. We have to look beyond Mr. Ehrlich who may or may not have the best of intentions. What happens after Mr. Ehrlich? What happens if these properties do become cooperative and symbiotic and one day turn into something quite different from what we're discussing here. You are a Planning Board, and I want you to plan for us. I want you to abide by the word "planning" in your name, and I want you to use the Code to protect us. If you see fit that this plan for Orient is going to be subverted by one inch at a time giving waivers to something that in the end will really hurt our special village. It is a historic place, and I feel that I am living in my house as the most recent resident I think beyond myself and I think beyond Mr. Ehrlich, too, and I hope you will as well. This letter is from my neighbors, Jane Friesen and Ed Manning, and they asked me to read it to you: "We are vigorously opposed to any commercial use of the Ehrlich house at the corner of Village Lane and Route 25 in Orient. As the parents of a 3-year-old child, we are acutely aware of the hazards of traffic on Route 25. As things are, many vehicles travel through this intersection at excessive speed making turns onto and out of Village Lane and Young's Road hazardous, and crossing the road is challenging. The addition of a frequently used narrow commercial driveway nearly opposite Young's Road will effectively create a continuous unmarked and unregulated intersection along nearly 250' of Route 25 from Oyster Ponds Lane to the far edge of Village Lane, situated along a curve. I'm not reading the whole thing. They want you to oppose the utilization of the property for other reasons: because it fails to meet the 25' buffer zone requirement, which they say: "we believe that the Code requirements are not just law, F Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty March 13, 2006 but exist for common sense reasons." I'm skipping, OK? "it will detrimentally alter the historical and present day residential character of this part of Village Lane, and consequently quality of life and surrounding property values. It fails to respect the long history of the house as a private dwelling in a designated historical area. There is no shortage of suitable locations for commercial ventures of this or any other nature in Southold Town or Greenport Village." I feel that someone has to take charge and say that all three of these properties: the Ehrlich house, the Candy Man and the Little House, there's a danger here. And I'm hoping that somehow, it's not your job as the Planning Board, but clearly these should be rezoned and the village protected forever, and I hope you can do whatever your role is in forwarding that agenda. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Yes, sir? George Johnson: I live in Browns Hills in Orient, and I've lived in Orient for almost 50 years. I've recently retired, but I've spent a lot of time, probably 40 years, working for museums: the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Museum of Modern Art, etc., and just want to speak for a second about the private auction aspect of this. I'm fascinated by the definition of, or non -definition of "gift shop" of various things, but the private auction seems to me to be a contradiction in terms. The only way an auction is going to work is if there are a lot of people bidding against each other unless, as Ms. Moore said, you do it through internet or something of the sort. But if there are key people, they're not going to fit in that parking lot if there's an auction. They're going to certainly be lined up along the highway and into Village Lane if there's to be any success at all for business, you can't do it with two or three people. Auctions of this sort by their very nature are public. Think of Mills Auctions, for instance. They are advertised, otherwise they're private sales, they're not private auctions. I have a feeling that there's a sense of putting in as many possibilities so that you can go out in any direction from that, so that all these definitions of what this property is to be used for is purposely being left as a very vague entity: and we'll have a bit of this and a bit of that and a bit of the other, and it'll all work out. It won't work out. Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board? Susan Utz: I've lived on Young's Road for 30 years. I'm kinda forgetful, I'm gonna write my name now. I agree with all the people who have voiced their opposition to the Ehrlich property being made into some sort of a business. I don't have anything to add to the reason it should be made into a business, because it's been said. I have lived very close to the Main Road on Young's Road across the street from the Ehrlich property for 30 years. I've been trying to make turns into Young's Road. Usually coming from the west for 30 years. I no longer try to make a turn onto Young's Road, even when coming from the west. I go further east, circle around somewhere, and come back. I go out of my way to do this, to save my life. I went out of my way to do this when my four children were in the car because a large tractor -trailer tried to pass me on the right, which would be coming from the west making it very close to the Ehrlich property. There's no room for passing when somebody is stopped on the main road to turn left onto Young's Road. You can imagine, in my small car with my four rI F Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty -One March 13, 2006 children, and that tractor -trailer blasting the horn, that I can still remember that sound and the fear. It has been said by Miss Moore several times that things that are against the law in the area of the Ehrlich property would be taken care of by law enforcement officials. Therefore, if people were parked where they don't belong, of course somebody would come along right away and regulate that who is in charge of the law, oh yes? Is that what happens when we are trying to drive home from our jobs in Greenport and people are passing us on the right, on the left, around corners, over double lines, to get to wherever they're going? No. That is not what happens. Perhaps there are not enough law enforcement officials to keep a good eye on that. So that's not going to happen. When I was a little girl, for whatever reason at the age of 10, 1 had to know my purpose in life. My mother kept sending me upstairs: "Take an aspirin, dear, you'll probably feel better tomorrow." I had to know. She finally sat me on her lap and said, "Susie, your purpose is going to be to try to help the world feel better." Well, at the age of 10, it didn't mean a whole lot, but it set a good goal for me. Now, tonight I've listened to everything. I wonder how I can make this little world I'm in right here feel better about the situation that's being debated. I try to live by compassion and kindness. That's it. Whether I like the idea of something or don't. Whether I get along with somebody or I don't. I feel compassion for Mr. Ehrlich for obviously he's being greatly opposed by many. I haven't heard one person get up and say: "Let's give that place a go as a business." Funny thing, I didn't hear anybody say that, except possibly his lawyer, who is trying to encourage the idea on his behalf. So I do, I feel compassion for him because this is wrong. Some things in life are black and white, right and wrong. This idea of trying to have a business on that particular spot is wrong. If nothing else, I was born with common sense, sympathy and a good sense of humor. That might have gotten in my genes. This is wrong. I feel compassion for somebody who's trying to make a go of this idea. And I feel compassion for his lawyer, who is trying to represent him and do it as well as she can. That's very sad. And I feel great compassion for my fellow Orienters who are suffering month after month with the idea that this could possibly happen. Thank you for listening. Chairperson Woodhouse: Is there anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? Jim Michter: From the Candy Man. First of all, on your site plan, is there access to our property? Pat Moore: We don't have access to your property. We have to provide an access in the event you ever offer that to the Planning Board. Jim Michter: All right. Because I saw that on the...... I was just wondering if the State Pat Moore: No. Jim Michter: My only problem with it is the parking. They're gonna be parking in our parking lot, and if it does go through to be a coffee house you know whatever with liquor Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty -Two March 13, 2006 and stuff, I just don't want to be responsible for people parking in our parking lot. Is there gonna be a fence, 6' fence on our side? Pat Moore: &An I assure you there is not going to be a coffee house, there is not a liquor license, so could we deal with this as Jim Michter: I guess so. How about our power was turned off quite a while ago because they put a 3-phase power into this building for some kind of equipment for cooking or whatever. Is that still in there? Pat Moore: When the time comes to get approval for this as a site plan, the Building Department will make sure that we have it conforming with our site plan. Jim Michter: So it's still there. Pat Moore: I don't know. Jim Michter: This was in the Suffolk Times in 2002. 1 just walked over there, I was wondering what people were doing, they were parked I think if I remember right, in our parking lot, and they took this picture of their place. They all stood on our side in our parking lot for the Suffolk Times. And it just seems to be like everybody else does, too. The lawn mower guys don't go in your place to park to cut the grass, so I don't know how people are gonna park in there when they mow, and if a truck or UPS like anybody else says, I think it's gonna be a major problem. I'm just wondering how we can keep, you know, if it does become something else, keep people out of our parking lot, I don't want to be responsible and getting calls from my neighbors saying that you know there's people hanging out there and whatever. Thank you. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Please sign your name. Anyone else who would like to address the Board on this application? Frances Demarest: Can I make one suggestion: where there's so much opposition to this Ehrlich. I think I have a very good suggestion for Mr. Ehrlich. He's living in Orient. I would suggest that he go to Greenport Village and open the shop that he wants there. I think that would be a very good idea for him to consider, because Orient does not want his store. There is no room to park, and it's a danger point. As I said before, we had that horrible accident, and I missed it by the grace of God, and I'll never forget it. I was speaking with a person outside of the Post Office and we talked about ten minutes and, as I said, that third car pulled off across the street, my father owned the building. And it's no place for his store, I'm sorry. Chairperson Woodhouse: Thank you. Is there anyone else who hasn't had a chance to speak, who would like to speak? Going once, going twice. Is there anyone on the Board who would like to ask a question at this point? (no response) I am going to ask for a motion to close the public hearing but reserve decision upon consideration of this application, all public comments that have been provided, a review of the record of • Southold Town Planning Board Page Thirty -Three March 13, 2006 these proceedings, and determination of whether the application complies with the Town Site Plan requirements. Ken Edwards: I will entertain that motion. George Solomon: Second. Chairperson Woodhouse: All in favor? Let's take a vote. Planning Board: Yes Chairperson Woodhouse: It is then the Planning Board's intent, under our guidelines we must issue a decision; we will arrive at a decision on this application by the next scheduled public meeting and will issue a written determination in accordance with that decision. So, we will make our determination and we will vote at the next hearing scheduled for April 10, 2006. Chairperson Woodhouse: 6:15 p.m. — Sannino, Anthony: This proposal is to relocate the building envelope on Lot 3 of the approved subdivision map of Hanoch and Watts (filed map number 9059, February 1, 1991) in the A-C Zone to a new location 80' from the s/w property line, 25' from the n/w property line and 160' from the n/e property line shown on the survey prepared by John T. Metzger dated January 24, 2006, last revised February 9, 2006. SCTM#1000-101-1-14.4 • • s� SCOTT A. RUSSELL JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. �% f SUPERVISOR ENGINEER TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD T TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (631) - 765 - 9015 �l �y Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse � . „ February-9,- _ Chairperson - Planning Board ��, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Erhlich, Robert • Site Plan: 2006 State Route 25 & Village Lane, Orient SCTM #: 1000-18-05-05 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: As per a request from your office, I have reviewed �he•Site_Pfa'ff for the above referenced project. The Site Plan is dated 1/13/06 and has been prepared by the office of Michael Mapes, P.E. Please consider the following: This site plan indicates that a NYS DOT Curb Cut Permit (# 10-05-0458) has been issued. A copy of the actual permit should be submitted to the Town for the files. 2. Drainage calculations have been provided and meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. 3. The Site Plan has a table indicating "Building Floor Area Usage". This table shows that there are three usable floors in the existing structure. It is recommended that the Planning Board add a condition to the Site Plan Approval that would require the existing building to comply with the New York State Building Code for the intended use of the new facility. (Note: This building should be code compliant even if there is no proposed building construction.) With the exception of the items listed herein, this site plan meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. cc: Peter Hams (Superintendent of Highways) Michael Verity (Principal Building Inspector) • i PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 March 10, 2006 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: EHRLICH SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 Dear Chairman: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting together with green certified mail receipts cards received as of date for the above referenced matter. Thank you. yours, PCM/bp Encls. 10 0 PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of ROBERT EHRLICH Regarding Posting of Sign Upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000-18-5-5 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF SIGN POSTING I, Patricia C. Moore, residing at Southold, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 6th day of March, 2006, 1 personally placed the Town's official Poster, with the date of hearing and nature of the application noted thereon, securely upon the property, located ten (10) feet or closer from the street or right-of-way (driveway entrance) - facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance'; and that I hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date, which hearing date was shown to be on Monday, March 13, 2006. �--PATRICIA C. MOORE Sworn to before me this �qy of March, 2006. "ti PERIQNs. ►,Wv Pubic. Sete of NasMSY N. 01FE 6130B38 Coeliliotl In SAD k County N/ Commission 6pn es July 18 'near the entrance or driveway entrance of the property, as the area most visible to passersby. PA'TRICIA C. MO [- � -51020 MA SOUT,,IOLD . -. 4. Restricted Delivery? 9. Service Type 1 (Extra P••) nYes I CERTIFIED 1 2 Article Number 1 7192 6463 3110 0000 0485 1 XB. Rlecerved�AesesPrint Clearly) IIIIII III II IIII II III IIIIIIIII IIIIIII I III 7192 6463 3110 0000 0485 P,"E LwPECT' 1 (XDIII FN AJl &a bySmdod '66.............................. ........ ............ cur st.re PATRICIA C. MOORE, 51020 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 (❑Addressee or Recelved49y: (Please Print Date of Delivery ---D f Addressse'sAddress tsobbrrAF AIOM.0 byz;; PATRICIA C. MOORE 51020 MAIN R99AD SOUTHOLD NY �1971 I A. Signature: (DAddressee or Received By: (MeasePrint Cleary) Date of Delivery --)-) I ddressee's Addreba (ADAMnIFnxnAtlOn.a Us.Obys.M.� ,. Article Addressed To: JESSE A. MOULD & WIFE 330 VILLAGE LANE PO BOX 445 ORIENT NY 11957 I I 1 4. Restricted Delivery? 8, Service Type (Extra Pee) Yes CERTIFIED 2 Article Number 1 7192 6463 3110 0000 0423 (_ Illll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII 7192 6463 3110 0000 0423 ,. Article Addressed To: EDWIN JR• POBOX430I R' ORIENT NY 1 19 57000 EDN 161 OSS I q! g' 4. Restricted Delivery? A Service Type 3_ (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes CERTIFIED 2 Article Number zrrc� i E I n A I 7192 6463 3110 0000 0478 O r'lA I IIIIIIIIIIII {�Hz I 2 6463 3110 0 jAd 0 0478LAAD o z oA d ToON�. PAPANyPXIO & WIFE m PATRICIA C. MOORE 4. Restricted Delivery? 3. Service Type 51020 MAIN ROAD (own Fss) ❑Yes CERTIFIED SOUTHOLD NY 11971 2. Article Number 'I 't I 7192 6463 3110 0000 0461 Sign ure: (p Atldre ee or DAgent) `AF IIIIII III II IIII II III IIIIIIIII III III II III B. Received By: (Please Print Clearly) I �Ti92 6463 3110 0000 0461 I C. ate of Delivery 1. A 'Addressed To: :1 V- D.Addressee's Address rnomnwFwnaas...uwvayswe.p DOUGLAS E. CONSTANT & ORS. 555 VILLAGE LANE / ORIENT NY 11957 Sac.ntl.ry Atltlreea Sulle) Apt. / Flocr (Ph.ae Pdnf dray) belivarY Atltlrau.......................................................... CITY grab ZIP i 4 Cotl. PATRICIA C. MOORE 4. Restricted Delivery? &Service Type 51020 MAIN ROAD CERTIFIED (rMrefee) ❑Yes SOUTHOLD NY 11971 2. Article Number 7192 6463 3110 0000 0454 I . A n ure d,re eporOAgent7 b W�arIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII B. Received By: rmt cleany) c�6�6 Sys �ING 7192 6463 3110 0000 0454 C. Date ivory 1. Article Addressed To: I B.Add Addrseeaoaw.e A •r+•ntle JEFFREY C. & CLAUDIA J. KING PO BOX 69 -��Z . . aoi.-.c„y) ORIENT NY 11957 I ..o:iiv::r nduJ................... ....................... .............. i __. .c..u..r..................................._..d............................... zl.4 _ 4. Restricted Delivery? &Service Type PATRICIA C. MOORE 51020 MAIN ROAD (ExenFes) ❑Yes CERTIFIED SOUTHOLD NY 11971 .+ a 2. Article Number 7192 6463 3110 0000 0447 •e • L`A+Signeture: (DAtl ress gent) IIIIII III II IIII II III III IIIIII II IIIIII III +d B. tceived By: ( Ptl a 7192 6463 3110 0000 0447 I I C. Date of Del S 1. Article Addressed To: 77 t9 Z < WM • J • 8 EVELYN M • HEINS o.AddressaWsAJ s awes I r9 PO BOX 232 S� ORIENT NY 11957 Swwtlfry Atltlr... I Salta IA.r.Fb.r Itslww RIM C/e.r1y) I................................................................................... 0 0 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: EHRLICH SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 Dear Chairman: March 6, 2006 `'9 � .t Sgytfipld im�n 412nm 'Bascd ,., dA Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Mailing together with certified mail receipts for the above referenced matter. Thank you. PCM/bp Encls. LX 0 0 PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT ROBERT EHRLICH OF (Name of Applicant) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000-18-5-5 ------------------------------- ------------------x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK,) Betsy Perkins, residing at Mattituck, New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the 6T" day of March, 2006, 1 personally mailed at the United States Post Office in Southold, New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, a true copy of the attached Legal Notice in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the official records on file with the ( X ) Assessors, or ( ) County Real Property Office for every property which abuts an i across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of-way of record, sArounding the p licant's property. Sworn to before me this 6 7-y day of March, 2006. (Notary Public) MARGARET C. RUTKOWSIQ Notary Public, State of Now York No. 4982528 Qualified In Suffolk Cou Commission Expires June 3, �Q 7 PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. 0 Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-18-5-5; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the General Business District, Zone B; 4. That the application is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. 2-story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. and 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space for art, antique and auction gallery use on a .28 acre parcel located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2"d Fl., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Robert Ehrlich Date: 2/15/06 EHRLICH SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 EDWIN J. BLESCH JR. PO BOX 430 ORIENT NY 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-1-14 JUSTIN OCKENDEN KERI A. CHRIST 115 PERRY ST., APT. 2B NEW YORK NY 10004 SCTM: 1000-18-2-21 WM. J. & EVELYN M. HEINS PO BOX 232 ORIENT NY 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-5-4.1 JEFFREY C. & CLAUDIA J. KING PO BOX 69 ORIENT NY 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-5-6 DOUGLAS E. CONSTANT & ORS. 555 VILLAGE LANE ORIENT NY 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-5-7 EDMOND L. PAPANTONIO & WIFE 1615 SPRING VALLEY RD OSSINING NY 10562 SCTM: 1000-18-5-9.1 JESSE A. MOULD & WIFE 330 VILLAGE LANE PO BOX 445 ORIENT NY 11957 SCTM: 1000-25-8.2 RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 N23 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE. EHRLICH PR HEARING SEND TO: EDWIN J. BLESCH JR. PO BOX 430 ORIENT NY 11957.E FEES: RE 7792 6463.0000 0430 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING i SEND TO: JUSTIN OCKENDEN KERI A. CHRIST 115 PERRY ST., APT. 2B NEW YORK NY 10004 FEES: 0.39 Postage 0.39 240 C T-� 240 1.85 f' bb 1.85 'V' L1ed 1.54 7E i/�, j O 4.64 � PO ARK I RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 0461 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING SEND TO: DOUGLAS E. CONSTANT 8 OF 555 VILLAGE LANE ORIENT NY 11957 RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 0478 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING SEND TO: EDMOND L PAPANTONIO 8 W 1615 SPRING VALLEY RD OSSINING NY 10562 FEES: FEES: P tagsS O C.39 C2.40 eM1if e 2 40 1 urf ¢ceipt O� 1.85 a re Rac esln O strcCetl 64 �.TAIL STMA17�0_ E S�A TMAbk OR W, RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 N47 FROM: Patncia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING SEND TO: WM. J. 8 EVELYN M. HEINS PO BOX 232 ORIENT NY 11957 FEES: RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 0454 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING SEND TO: JEFFREY C. 8 CLAUDIA J. KIND PO BOX 69 I ORIENT NY 11957 FEES: Postage 0.39 Certified Fee 2.40 Returff iOLO 1.86 e fQ ti TORvz QR DA 2ro K 0 k` 1 GSpS v RECEIPT 7192 6463 3110 0000 0485 FROM: Patricia C. Moore RE: EHRLICH PB HEARING SEND TO: JESSE A. MOULD 8 WIFE 330 VILLAGE LANE PO BOX 445 ORIENT NY 11957 FEES: Posts 0.39 2.40 / 1.85 6 syicrea —f % T TAL. :'� 4.64 POSTMARK 044 TE 1 �„ i PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 Attn: Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall Annex PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 March 6, 2006 RE: SITE PLAN FOR ROBERT EHRLICH 2254 NYS ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Semon: 1 a With reference to the above and pursuant to your requirements in your letter dated February 17, 2006 (copy enclosed), please be advised that the C&R's have been recorded. I am enclosing a certified copy for your records. Thank you and please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions. V truly yours, d/u. Patricia C. Moore PC' C by encls. C. Mr. eltEhrlich PLANNINGBOARD MEMBER• JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND February 17, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 • MAILING ADDRESS: OF SOp %yO! P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex v' 54375 State Route 25 �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Comm Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Robert Ehrlich Site Plan 2254 NYS Route 25, Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone B Dear Ms. Moore: This letter is to inform you that the draft C&R's for the above project have been reviewed by the Town Attorney and are ready to be filed and recorded. Please note that we will need them before March 13, 2006, the date of the Public Hearing. If there are any questions, please contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 D.m. Respectfully4.1-" yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer .-I rl 2 mr Number of pages Y, RE_ORDE�D TORRENS CLERK OF Serial # ;tiFFOLK COW?Y L (l00012438 Certificate # P 728 Prior Ctf. # Deed . Mortgage Instrument Deed / Mortgage Tax Stamp Recording / Filing Stamps 3 1 FEES Page / Filing Fee _ _ Mortgage Amt. 1. Basic Tax Handling 5. QQ— _ 2. Additional Tax TP-584 Sub Total Spec. / Assit. Notation - or EA-5217 (County) Sub Total Spec. / Add. TOT. MTG TAX BA-5217 (State) Dual Town Dual County R.P.T.S.A. sy�(C4Otyy Held for Appointment to Transfer Tax Comm. of Ed. 5, 00 Mansion Tax Affidavit * o�C�` The property covered by this motgage is or will be improved by a one or two Certified Copy family dwelling only. YES or NO Reg. Copy Sub Total If NO, see appropriate tax clause on Other Grand Total page # of this instrument. 4 District NY Section I Block I Lot 5 Community Preservation Fund Real 1000 01800 0500 005000 Consideration Amount $ 0.00 Property P T S CPF Tax Due $ 0.00 Tax Service R LPA A Agency 03-MAR Improved Verification Vacant Land 6 Satisfacl:ion/Discharges/Release List Property Owners Mailing Address RECORD & RETURN TO: TD PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ TD 51020 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 TD 7 Title Company Information Co. Name PECONIC ABSTRACT, INC. Title # _ 8 Suffolk Countv Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached DECLARATION AND COVENANT made by (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) ROBERT EHRT I H The premisis herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO In the Township of SOUTHOLD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the VILLAGE or HAMLET of ORIENT BOXES 6 THROUGH 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONT Y PRIOR TO RFCnRT)iNn OR FIT TNn SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DECLARATION/DOP Recorded: 03/03/2006 Number of Pages: 4 At: 10:36:57 AM Receipt Number : 06-0021661 LIBER: D00012438 PAGE: 728 District: Section: Block: 1000 018.00 05.00 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Page/Filing $12.00 NO Handling COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG TP-584 $5.00 NO Notation Cert.Copies $5.00 NO RPT SCTM $0.00 NO Fees Paid THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL Lot: 005.000 Exempt $5.00 NO $15.00 NO $0.00 NO $30.00 NO $77.00 11 DECLARATION AND COVENANT THIS DECLARATION made 4day of February 2006 by ROBERT EHRLICH, residing at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New York 11579, hereinafter referred to as the Declarant, states as follows: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at 2254 Main Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto as provided by the Declarant; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of a site plan, prepared by Michael Mapes P.E., dated February 2, 2006, and as a condition of granting said approval, the Town of Southold Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk Couny Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that same will be in the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARANT WITNESSETH: That Declarant, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That OWNER hereby authorizes the Planning Board to provide for an access to the adjacent: westerly parcel known as "The Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1, and their successors and assigns, guests or invitees, for ingress and egress over the subject premises on the paved areas as shown on the site plan of Michael Mapes P.E., dated February 2, 2006. E 2. The declarant hereby agrees to execute any and all documents which may be required to effectuate the common access where shown on the site plan. 3. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be: required. 4. These Covenants are not binding or take effect until such time as the Planning Board has reviewed and approved a site plan for the adjacent westerly parcel known as "the Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1 and determined that a cross access is appropriate for the use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year above written. Robert Ehrlich STATE OF NEW YORK ) COUNTY OF ) ASsac{ On the day of �, 2006, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for -^� ally anneare Robert Ehrlich personally known to me or proved to me on the n,me is subscribed to the within COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK SS.: the Court of RRecordd t PASCALE, Actin annexed clerk of the County of Suffolk and y 'th the original do ereb Q } at I have co office ..lC = oz �%�1. °Pared the co f 1 2. and, that the same a is .RECORDED in my PY thereof, and of the whole of such original, ame is a true In Testimony Whereof I have her �d Q the seal of said County and Court ... Se my h � andn,`�i�1 �this . `'.lZILCTING .0 CLERK • SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument at the intersection of the westerly line of Village Lane with the southerly line of Main Road from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along said westerly line of Village Lane, South 14 degrees 30 minutes East, 94.92 feet to a monument; THENCE along land now or formerly of Corcoran, two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 70.00 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 14 minutes West, 57.00 feet to land now or formerly of Hale; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Hale, three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 51.62 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 49 minutes West, 28.02 feet; 3) North 80 degrees 18 minutes West, 20.93 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE along land of Blanche Clingen, Elinor Bristow and Katharine Leslie, North 21 degrees 45 minutes East,130.54 feet to an iron pipe on said southerly line of the Main Road; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road, two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 82 degrees 02 minutes East, 25.57 feet to a monument; 2) THENCE South 83 degrees 15 minutes East, 70.31 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. r PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND February 17, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: OF 30(/ � Tyo� P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G ac 54375 State Route 25 ,'2 • �OQ (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) COM Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765.1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Robert Ehrlich Site Plan 2254 NYS Route 25, Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone B Dear Ms. Moore: This letter is to inform you that the draft C&R's for the above project have been reviewed by the Town Attorney and are ready to be filed and recorded. Please note that we will need them before March 13, 2006, the date of the Public Hearing. If there are any questions, please contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Reviewer PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND February 14, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 • �O �IYOMNI� (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich Located at 22540 NYS Road 25 and the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District Dear Mrs. Moore: The following resolutions were adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 13, 2006: WHEREAS, the site plan is for alteration of an existing 1,929 sq.ft. two-story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store with 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of miscellaneous space for art, antique and auction gallery use on a .28-acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM# 1000-18.-5-5; be it therefore RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (6 NYCRR), Part 617.5 © (7), makes a determination that the proposed action is a Type II and not subject to review; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board set Monday, March 13, 2006 at 6:10 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated January 13, 2006 and last revision known as "E". Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. You may pick up the sign and the post at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town Annex. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, March 10th The sign and the post must be Ehrlich Gift Shop Page Two February 14, 2006 If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, enlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson encs. • #7766 STATE OF NEW YORK) ) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) Jean Burgon of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly published in said Newspaper once each week for 1 weeks, successively, commencing on the 2nd day of March 2006 ncipai I Clerk Sworn to before me this day of A __.: 2006 C"RIS11bip, 40UNSK PORK NOTARY PUBLIC.S1p1E OF NEW No 01406105050 2B, pu011ilec 4n Suttolk county20b8 cotntrdslIon Explies February LEGAL NOTICE Notice of public Herring NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hear- ing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 13th Iday of March, 2006 on the question of .the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed subdivision for 'Barbara Grattan located on the w/s/o Depot Lane, 147' n/o School House Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 102-1-9. 6-05 p.m.Proposed site plan for North Fork Self Storage LLC located on the s/ s/o County Road 48 approximately 150' s/o Depot Lane in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-1.4. 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Rob- ert Ehrlich located on the s/w comer of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Ori- ent, Town of Southold, County of Suf- folk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-18-5-5. 6:15 p.m. Proposed amendment of Hanoch and Watts subdivision map, located on the w/s/o Alvah's Lane, ap- proximately 1297' n/o County Road 48 in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 101-1-14A. Dated:2/27/06 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson 7766-1T 32 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on _ I have sent notices, by certified mail — return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY. 12:00 noon, Fri., 3/10/06 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich SCTM#s: 1000-18-5-5 Date of Hearing: Monday, March 13, 6:10 p.m. Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-18-5-5; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the General Business District, Zone B; 4. That the application is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. 2-story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. and 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space for art, antique and auction gallery use on a .28 acre parcel located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient; 5. That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2nd Fl., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; 6. That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, March 13, 2006 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): Robert Ehrlich Date: 2/15/06 ROBERT EHRLICH SITE PLAN FOR ROBERT EHRLICH • 1000-18-5-5 Proposal for alteration of an existing 1,929 sq.ft. 2-story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. and 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc. space for art, antique and auction gallery use on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone. MONO - MARCH 13, 2006 - 6:10 P.M. 0 �'L 1 0 0 Semon, Bruno To: Corcoran, Kieran Subject: RE: Erlich C&R's Thank you -----Original Message ----- From: Corcoran, Kieran Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:42 AM To: Semon, Bruno Subject: Erlich C&R's Bruno, The draft C&R's Pat Moore provided are consistent with what she and I discussed and to address the cross easement issue. Kieran 1 PERM .42.(2/05) STATE EW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT N _ Hir:H WORK PERMIT 001 rt.� Permit Fee: $ 550 Insurance Fee: $ Ly 175.00 C L5 E Permit No.10-05- 0458 Total Received: $ 725.0Q i Project Identific@tion No.. 07/01/ 2006 Check or M.O. No.; 1087/1089 �+- -�� Expiration Date: 83 FED 15 2006 SH No.: 50 .00 Deposit Rec. for $ 478113687 Check or M.O. No.: 10/11/2005 Southold Town Dated: 0.00 "Permittee: ROiP g}MUCH o Perfo the State RfgFit-of Way $ P.O.&7DC 326 "Fe Chargeablh 19 Bond No.: ($ Oleo) EIRA (3.Ilr`!I', NY laB ram_ „ . �•�i or Undertaking on File. att: Billing Address: (complete if different from above) Return of Deposit -Made Payable to: (complete If different from Pernittee) Und r the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law, permission is hereby granted to the permittee to: Csetr Zr A permanently uintelo couoretal access on o/s'olit 26 betgnn NN's 1114-1716 6 other incidental work per a ttached plans A space. All work shall be to satisfaction of RE, All work shall be done in accordance with approved p lens or AORE.N 6PT shall be responsibility of the porsitteo until complttion of all work, etc... THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. ANYONE WORKING IN -THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF=WAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR HIGH VISIBILITYAPQARE L (ORANGEIYELLOW)AND AHARD HAT SUHOLK SOUTHOLD 26 County - Municipality - Route# - as set forth and represented«in the attached application at the particullar location or area or over the routes as stated therein if required• and and form of this permit. Dat A P�A�UyR, N.Y. Dated n8d: 6 spaclal, and methods of performing work, H any; all of which are set forth in the application, Commissioner of T rtatt, 31AENE SNITN By , // IMPORTANT THIS PERMIT, WITH APPLICATION AND DRAWI (OR COPIES THEREOF) ATTACHED SHALL BE PLACED 1N THE; HAND$ TF`� ` CTOR BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. THE HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT ALL BEAYAlLAbU* T IE1* bOfOiNO6661115iRUCT.ION. BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS C MPLETION, THE PfRNllTt i l$OCl1TELY MUST NOTIFY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER, KEVIN NATTIM11 19M COUNTY WHO (631)121-1131 RIVERNEAD, NEW YOU 11901 UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED, THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED, SIGNED BY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE i(ESIDENT,ENGIINEE R Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of deposit or retum/reiease of bond is requested. DATE. PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT (If Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse side of this form must be completed. ❑ Refund of Deposit is authorized ❑ Return of Bond is authorized ❑ Mailing address of refund has been verified. Amount charged against Bond may be released If different, list new address below. ❑ Retain Bond for future permits ttn�La. ❑ Forfeit of Guarantee Deposit is, authorized t+La. &T Sther _.DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. ❑ Permit closed ❑ Bond retumad/released ❑ Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized ❑ Forfeit Guarantee Deposit to NYSDOT ❑ Other DATE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER The issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit at Its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permittee will cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto until all work under the permit is safisfactorily completed, in accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from work performed pursuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. " Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way authorized by the work permit, the Pelson, firm, corporation, municipality, or state department or agency, and his or Its successors in Interest, shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of such work or portion of such work as sat forth within the terns and conditions of the work permit. fi � ^ N 0 Jc' )�Jr I I . ni.I _iCNNO`,%Nv PERM 42 (2/05) TIM-13`1 NSOW YAWHOIH INSPECTION REPORT For each High0milk4Ait be performed. The following report must be compleA f&'61ach site visit, indica the date, inspector,o i gd ISAR6�'A64&6n. If the totailjnspection time exceeds 1 hour, then a FIN 4W�AYASPE�CT p FOR C DEPARTMENT SE r .1 is n I oO "),loR ni (4:) nl dldw ky :.ql)-i no pnimin..)Ttilu 10 _y I HOURS WORKED BY DATE I i'l� kNjS Name Date Regular Overtime EA I;,_ i- R 0 Name :.IT vcq 5ofl ',1 f letW " ip Z F'!; Z F'!; i1n�v 'VrJ' GeMp.i 10* 1-s:":' 16�iui_ 71, �r. R it 0 3V'a 0SO, I WAh "t-T Oq LIA 'lViA j z R + olq-,9qjj bqJ1steai,, �;t 0 jw' lo not or; iC '10it8 PrjF bPltf`t1�-!tA_x v .9(! i - 113611 q'i'4 ri; i J, bn i,' 1-190eC, =7777 7 77— TOTAL HOURS filn Cj ji- Xq INSTRUCTIONS*\ 1 NAME: m 0 Inskatol' m1p -AL'4 Y%. 3F'01�ls F� k1h, ;A 030AJ9 3. Then i�Tb 4. 0: n H(, 15. HOURS: kigki&Us tbv7§ for R and 16. TOTAL HOURS: Add the columns ]for R and 0. �xij pF 1 'Aj, ',7.; 1,'? OQINJ:�(, It �A' ;'P lim?3q. 31: C6MQaft9&VA-H" ' ':1i" L to iiq t0 'n ?", 1 , " {es " 'L :r wi Z:i '!t I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST -OF MyXIJOWLEDGE, NAME 92LI Li r.VC1L -r TITLE -41 ic no (Vj' ail 'ifli 11 noalaq arlf fl, niect blow ziml l, q uajjjcrf",; 1; ljrw-iO4;191" , V swrip i'.40 n,..a6; isnoi bns, q Drisnaln ism Or' , � 10 Old I anoq Psi ed Ilsdi'tZ91,31fli Tit: alo aeqo�V? at! 40 81T1 ")"IF '141116aS W '%rilija 7c �irjitioq to Ai�,,,, riaoa ic fit 10 'bPE I ,j 9W airif1w �%i PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:: (631) 765-4643 February 13, 2006 Attn: Bruno Semon Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: ROBERT EHRLICH 2254 MAIN ROAD, ORIENT, NEW YORK Dear Bruno: Enclosed please find six (6) sets of the corrected site plan pursuant to our conversation. Thank you. ECM/>p Encls. Very ly urs, 7ATRI IA C. MOORE LECEE WE CF E 0 13 ?006 SO— can Plarn 76 hard i SCOTT A. RUSSELL SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (631) - 765 - 9015 • JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Erhlich, Robert - Site Plan: State Route 25 & Village Lane, Orient SCTM #: 1000-18-05-05 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Tel. (631) - 765 - 1560 February 9, 2006 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the Site Plan for the above referenced project. The Site Plan is dated 1/13/06 and has been prepared by the office of Michael Mapes, P.E. Please consider the following: This site plan indicates that a NYS DOT Curb Cut Permit (# 10-05-0458) has been issued. A copy of the actual permit should be submitted to the Town for the files. 2. Drainage calculations have been provided and meet the minimum requirements of Town Code. 3. The Site Plan has a table indicating 'Building Floor Area Usage". This table shows that there are three usable floors in the existing structure. It is recommended that the Planning Board add a condition to the Site Plan Approval that would require the existing building to comply with the New York State Building Code forthe intended use of the new facility. (Note: This building should be code compliant even if there is no proposed building construction.) With the exception of the items listed herein, this site plan meets the minimum requirements of the Town Code. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. Sincerely, James A. Richter. R.A. cc: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) Michael Verity (Principal Building Inspector) ~ • MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS P.O. Box 1179. JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair QF SO(/ %yO� Southold, NY 11971 �0�� OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON:%�O n Q 54375 State Route 25 JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) f� OWN, N� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE MEMORANDUM TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: February 9, 2006 To: Kieran Corcoran Planning Board Members �, From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewerl/�f J Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich �� Located at 22540 NYS Road 25 and the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B District In reference to the above site plan application, attached are the draft c&r's to be filed for this site plan and a copy of the survey. SP Proposed Build Out: This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq-ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. and 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space for Art, Antique and Auction Gallery use on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. The site plan is scheduled to receive a Type II determination on February 13, 2006 and the public hearing will be scheduled for March 13, 2006. Please review the attached document and let me know if this can be executed as drafted. I will need to contact the agent Patricia Moore, Esq. for this to be filed with Suffolk County. Thanks Cc: File, vl,mt Attachment, survey & c&r's PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 February 2, 2006 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Margaret Rutkowski Secretary In accordance with the Board's request, enclosed please find draft Covenants & Restrictions for the cross easement. I have forwarded a copy to the Assistant Town Attorney for his review. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Mr. Ehrlich w/encl. Ver yours, C'-.J ' ricia C. Moore FEE - 3 2006 - ME St-- DECLARATION AND COVENANT THIS DECLARATION made the day of February 2005 by ROBERT EHRLICH, residing at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New York 11579, hereinafter referred to as the Declarant, states as follows: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at 2254 Main Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto as provided by the Declarant; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of a site plan, prepared by Michael Mapes P.E., dated / IA 06, and as a condition of granting said approval, the Town of Southold Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk Couny Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that same will be in the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARANT WITNESSETH: That Declarant, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: 1. That OWNER hereby authorizes the Planning Board to provide for an access to 6� 51L the adjacent westerly parcel known as "The Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; (%� - - Section 18 ;Block 5 ;Lot 4.1, a?td their successors and assigns, guests or invitees, for ingress and egress over the subject premises on the paved areas as shown on the site plan of Michael Mapes P.E., dated /��j OE 0 9 2. The declarant hereby agrees to execute any and all documents which may be required to effectuate the common access where shown on the site plan. 3. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 4. These Covenants are not binding or take effect until such time as the Planning Board has reviewed and approved a site plan for the adjacent westerly parcel known as "the Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1 and determined that a cross access is appropriate for the use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year above written. Robert Ehrlich STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss.: COUNTY OFSUFFOLK ) On the _ day of , 2006, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert Ehrlich personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public TITLE NU' `;EFOAC-3661 SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: -- — �1,s� iIce. BEGINNING at a monument at the intersection of the westerly line of Village Lane with the southerly line of Main Road from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along said westerly line of Village Lane, South 14 degrees Ql� 30 minutes East, 94.92 feet to a monument; THENCE along land now or formerly of Corcoran, two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 70.00 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 14 minutes West, 57.00 feet to land now or formerly of Hale; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Hale, three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 51.62 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 49 minutes West, 28.02 feet; 3) North 80 degrees 18 minutes West, 20.93 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE along land of Blanche Clingen, Elinor Bristow and Katharine Leslie, North 21 degrees 45 minutes East, 130.54 feet to an iron pipe on said southerly line of the Main Road; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road, two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 82 degrees 02 minutes East, 25.57 feet to a monument; 2) THENCE South 83 degrees 15 minutes East, 70.31 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. /f SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX,# 1000�18-5-5 MAP PREPARED: 0I-22-03 NELL LOCATED 02-13-'03 -- UPDATE 03-06-03, 04-01-05 OWNER. Robert Ebdich 2254 Main Reed Orient NY 11957 r FEB - 9 2005 NOTES: ■ MONUMENT O PIPE STAKE S SANITARY K KITGHEN EP EXPANSION POOL 5T SEPTIC TANK GT GREASE TRAP LP LEAGHIN6 POOL AREA = 12,148 5F OR 0.28 AGRE5 PROPERTY RESIDE5 IN: ZONE "B" 6ENERAL BU15NE55 WELL R 5EPTIG LOGATION5 PROVIDED BY OTHERS ELEVATIONS REFERENCE COUNTY TOPO MAPS 6RAPHIG SCALE I"= 20' /71-- _r r Park/^9 o"eq r r r r r septic 150'. I tree �B^ r treed abike r __ sryn r ' corb r V!r 9nW.� r r�GP r ELL 0 Dz N Z } D BHistoric Tree Planted by early settlers Maims SIZ #2,5 zoCQT,%e///n /,;%2, Y /o a 9 ns h"Ve/ dwelling well a septic I50G i`"anument t0 Local Veterans WE �� S A % aPam —. IF L. eel ,2 aF -r 111— e IF 'J''Ama....- ram. ae>�i m •.a. y�.D mi n`i".ey ere bmrq,ewum iew JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. NO.50202 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF. \\Hp server\d\PROS\01-302c.pro FBI CI 0 r r I 3 9 9 2 w '4" CIA STEEL CONCRETE FILLED PIPE STACHION Q WITH CAP O �IZ O cJ 4 4 3 2 NOTES: 1. TYPICAL DELIVERY TRUCK DIMENSIONS 24' LONG X 7.1' WIDE WITH 176" WHEELBASE 2. LAYOUT BASED ON 31.8' TURNING RADIUS 3. NUMBERING AND COLOR CODE SHOW TRUCK TURNING AROUND WITH A FIVE POINT TURN AT EACH POINT WHERE THE TRUCK STOPS TO EITHER GO FORWARD OR REVERSE. Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: EHRLICH GIFT SHOP TRUCK TURN AROUND LAN SIZE TRUCK TURN AROUND DDRA WING NUMBER BATE:1-24-2005 SCALE: P=16' SHEET I OF 3 2 1 REV, B m C9 SST/er 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 7 I 5 f 1 NOTES: 31.8' A• olD STEEL CONCRETE FILLED PIPE STACHION Q 1. TYPICAL DELIVERY TRUCK DIMENSIONS 24' LONG X 7.1' WIDE WITH LAP p O WITH 176" WHEELBASE O co 2. LAYOUT BASED ON 31.8' TURNING RADIUS �} L+ O 3. NUMBERING AND COLOR CODE SHOW TRUCK TURNING AROUND �Q WITH A FIVE POINT TURN AT EACH POINT WHERE THE TRUCK Q��cv STOPS TO EITHER GO FORWARD OR REVERSE. .l 5 2 4 S B B........ .................. _.................. � f ................... . ..................................... Michael P.E. 163 PENINSULA PAT of ISIS RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 P� �,P6L D. Mq �Qp� PHONE 369-2170 Co (UP)� TITLE: EHRLICH GIFT SHOP A ED i Lu TRUCK TURN AROUND LAYOU1 �"Fo SIZE A OT0��� 5 A TRUCK TURN AROUND REV. ROpEssto B D DRAWING NUMBER DATE:1-24-2005 SCALE' i -16' SHEET 1 OF 1 8 7 1 6 A11h 4 jft 3 2 1 E E Ll IBM 7■ a■ ■ I I II I I I L I �- -- `-hoid Town fiz^ning ?oard t C NOTES: 1. TYPICAL DELIVERY TRUCK DIMENSIONS 24' LONG X 7.1' WIDE WITH 176" WHEELBASE 2. LAYOUT BASED ON 31.8' TURNING RADIUS 3. NUMBERING AND COLOR CODE SHOW TRUCK TURNING AROUND WITH A FIVE POINT TURN AT EACH POINT WHERE THE TRUCK STOPS TO EITHER GO FORWARD OR REVERSE. Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: EHRLICH GIFT SHOP TRUCK TURN AROUND LAYOL iD TRUCK TURN AROUND REV DRAWING NUMBER DATE: 1 -24-2005 SCALE: =16SHEET 1 OF 1 3 � i ■[3 `[A PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary February 2, 2006 Ms. Jerri Woodhouse, Chairwoman and Southold Town Planning -Board 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: In accordance with the Board's request, enclosed please find draft Covenants & Restrictions for the cross easement. I have forwarded a copy to the Assistant Town Attorney for his review. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: Mr. Ehrlich w/encl. Ve yours, ii tricia C. Moore Fa - 3 2006 �:---- _�'---� pf� as S1 • DECLARATION AND COVENANT THIS DECLARATION made the day of February 2005 by ROBERT EHRLICH, residing at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New York 11579, hereinafter referred to as the Declarant, states as follows: WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of certain real property situate at 2254 Main Road, Orient, in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, more particularly bounded and described as set forth in Schedule "A" annexed hereto as provided by the Declarant; and WHEREAS, for and in consideration of the granting of a site plan, prepared by Michael Mapes P.E., dated , and as a condition of granting said approval, the Town of Southold Planning Board has required that the within Declaration be recorded in the Suffolk Couny Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, Declarant has considered the foregoing and determined that same will be in the best interest of the Declarant and subsequent owners of said parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DECLARANT WITNESSETH: That Declarant, for the purpose of carrying out the intentions above expressed does hereby make known, admit, publish, covenant and agree that the said premises herein described shall hereafter be subject to the following covenants which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all purchasers and holders of said premises, their heirs, executors, legal representatives, distributees, successors and assigns, to wit: That OWNER hereby authorizes the Planning Board to provide for an access to the adjacent westerly parcel known as "The Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1, and their successors and assigns, guests or invitees, for ingress and egress over the subject premises on the paved areas as shown on the site plan of Michael Mapes P.E., dated 2. The declarant hereby agrees to execute any and all documents which may be required to effectuate the common access where shown on the site plan. These covenants and restrictions can be modified only at the request of the then owner of the premises with the approval of a majority plus one of the Planning Board of the Town of Southold after a public hearing. Adjoining property owners shall be entitled to notice of such hearing, but their consent to such modification shall not be required. 4. These Covenants are not binding or take effect until such time as the Planning Board has reviewed and approved a site plan for the adjacent westerly parcel known as "the Candy Man", SCTM# District 1000; Section 18 ; Block 5 ; Lot 4.1 and determined that a cross access is appropriate for the use. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Declarant has hereunto set its hand and seal the day and year above written. Robert Ehrlich STATE OF NEW YORK ) ss.: COUNTY OFSUFFOLK ) On the _ day of 2006, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said State, personally appeared Robert Ehrlich personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the individual, or the person upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Notary Public TITLE NUIER: PAC-3661 • SCHEDULE "A" DESCRIPTION ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument at the intersection of the westerly line of Village Lane with the southerly line of Main Road from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along said westerly line of Village Lane, South 14 degrees 30 minutes East„ 94.92 feet to a monument; THENCE along land now or formerly of Corcoran, two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 70.00 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 14 minutes West, 57.00 feet to land now or formerly of Hale; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Hale, three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 51.62 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 49 minutes West, 28.02 feet; 3) North 80 degrees 18 minutes West, 20.93 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE along land of Blanche Clingen, Elinor Bristow and Katharine Leslie, North 21 degrees 45 minutes East, 130.54 feet to an iron pipe on said southerly line of the Main Road; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road, two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 82 degrees 02 minutes East, 25.57 feet to a monument; 2) THENCE South 83 degrees 15 minutes East, 70.31 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. PLANNING BOARD MEMBA JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND January 31, 2006 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 a SDUTyOIO Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex ems+ ac •t • �O D�YCOUNN, 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Robert Ehrlich Site Plan 2254 NYS Route 25, Southold, NY SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone B Dear Ms. Moore: This letter is to inform you that the above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on January 12, 2006. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 D.m. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD REVISED ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES 4:00 p.m., January 12, 2006 Town Hall Conference Room Present were: Councilman Thomas Wickham, Architects Glynis Berry and Ural Talgat, Acting Chairman Sanford Hanauer, members Herbert Ernest, Ronald McGreevy, Nicholas Planamento, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Bruno Semon, ARC Secretary Linda Randolph and project representatives. BCB Realty Holding Corp. SCTM# 1000-45-4-8.3 After a review of the map and signage, the Committee agreed to approve the project contingent upon reduction of the height and width of the main signage along the road. Ehrlich, Robert (Orient Gift Shop) SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 The Committee agreed to approve this project as submitted. Duck Walk Vineyard SCTM# 1000-75-2-2.1 Following review and discussion, the Committee agreed to approve the building design subject to light cuts and elevation, as well as an update on planting. Rich's Auto Body SCTM# 1000-102-3-1 The Committee agreed to approve the building subject to light cuts with the additional recommendations of corner landscaping & removal of the motel sign. OKI-DO, Ltd. (GAIA Holistic Circle) SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1 A presentation was made by Architects Butt/Otruba-O'Connor. The Committee agreed to conceptually approve the project subject to receipt of additional drawings/information. Orient FD Telecom Project SCTM#1000-18-5-13.8 The Committee agreed to accept the presented materials with the following recommendation: a 6' retaining wall with berm to surround all four sides of the fenced area with a planting of 10-12' cedar trees. Councilman Wickham urged committee members to select a Chairperson. The Town Board will restructure all Town Committee terms for three years beginning with 2006. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Linda Randolph ARC Secretary PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 souTyo�o Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G C '� 54375 State Route 25 • �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Courm, Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: January 30, 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Erlich SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zoning District B This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner ofNYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM# 1000- 18.-5-5 The proposed action has been reviewed to Chapter 95, Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The parcel is located within the Oysterponds Historical Society District. The property also serves as the gateway to the Orient hamlet and business district and any future action should be reviewed in this context. Policy 2 states: Policy 2 Preserve historic resources of the Town of Southold. The intent of this policy is to preserve these resources by encouraging and promoting private efforts to restore, conserve and maintain them. Policy Standards 2.1 Maximize preservation and retention of historic resources. A. Preserve the historic character of the resource by protecting historic materials and features or by making repairs using appropriate methods. B. Provide for compatible use or reuse of the historic resource, while limiting and minimizing inappropriate alterations to the resource. D. Avoid potential adverse impacts of new development on nearby historic resources. To further Policy 2 and Policy 3; Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold the following is recommended: 1. Require the perpetual preservation of the 40' Oak Tree and 35' Maple Tree as shown in the north east corner of the property and indicated on the site plan dated December 13, 2006. The surrounding properties water supply is from private wells. There is no intent to expand public water services to the area. Therefore, to further Policy 5, Protect and improve water quality in the Town of Southold and protect and improve the water quality and supply in the area, it is recommended that the following best management practices be required: 2. Require the use; of native plants and encourage the use of disease -resistant and drought -tolerant plants in landscaping. 3. Prohibit the residential application and use of synthetic pesticides capable of entering the potable water supply. 4. Prohibit the use of underground storage tanks, (except those with spill, overfill, and corrosion protection requirements in place). Additionally, where fertilization is proposed the following best management practices are recommended for lawn areas: 5. Apply a maximum of 1 lb. of nitrogen per 1000 square feet in any one application, with a cumulative application of no more than 2 lbs. per 1,000 square feet per year. 6. Choose fertilizers where the water-soluble nitrogen is no more than 20% of the total nitrogen in the mixture. 7. Choose organic fertilizers, whereby all nitrogen in the mixture is non -synthetic. 8. Apply products only during the growing season (typically mid -March through mid - October). To further Policy 8; Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes it is also recommended that following solid waste management initiatives be encouraged: 9. The use of materials generated by the Town of Southold Compost Facility which contribute to the replenishment of organic matter in local soils and help reduce the reliance of fertilizers and herbicides and minimize the reduction of fertilizers and herbicides in the Town's ground and surface waters. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, the proposed action is generally consistent with the LWRP provided that the above recommendations 1 through 4 are required. It is recommended that the applicant is advised of recommendations 5 through 9. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: January 27, 2006 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Robert Ehrlich Location: 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000 — Section 18- Block 05 — Lot 05 Date: January 13, 2006 Revised Date: S Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631) 765-1802 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE Art, antique and auction gallery IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS B DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. Michael Chief Building Inspector PATRICRC. MOORE, ATTORNEY AILAW 51020 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 (631) 765-4330 DATE �'.Z( Q� •' S JECT ,t 64'Ae ,. ° A ._tea v o Jn�fv d� Qe01 /2lfr Sl0Cl/t(0.7 GtS /`�C/r/Ps(Tc SIGNED.. Semon, Bruno To: Terry, Mark Cc: L'Eplattenier, Victor Subject: LWRP Erhlich site plan Hi Mark, This is a reminder on the Erhlich project LWRP comments. Be advised I sent you by memo transmittal today the final revised site plan and LWRP form with a request that comments are sent back by 2/6/06 PB work session. It would be best I get your comments by 1/30/06 PB work session. The Building Inspector will certify the plan and Jamie will try to issue comments by 1/30/06. Please advise me if additional information is needed. Thanks Bruno MAILING ADDRESS: PLANNING BOARD MEMBER P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair �OF SO(/ryO� Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: KENNETH L. EDWARDS Town Hall Annex MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON H 1, 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND �O �Comm, ' Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: January 25, 2006 To: Mark Terry, LWRP Coordinator From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Ehrlich, Robert 22540 NYS Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Status: At final stages with a Type II SEQR proposed at the February 13, 2006 meeting. In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan and the LWRP Form. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and submission of your consistency report to the Planning Board for review. Please have your response available for the Planning Board by February 6, 2006. Site plan enclosed needs to be returned to the Planning Department Site Plan File. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan date received January 23, 2006 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND January 24, 2006 n LI MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 S011 '. Southold, NY 11971 o�1QF OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex elmac 54375 State Route 25 �O O1�C00NVI (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM: # 1000-18-5-5 Dear Ms. Moore: We are in receipt of you letter dated January 6, 2006 and the engineer's turnaround proposal. The Planning Board held a work Session on January 23, 2006 and agreed to a SEQRA review at the February 13, 2006 meeting if the following is submitted to the Planning Department: • The Environmental Assessment Part 1 Form submitted on January 6, 2006 has discrepancies and will require a revision to reflect the current application. Please update the EAF and submit it to the Planning Department. Please contact us so we can discuss the changes. The following identified items still need to be addressed: • As discussed at the work session the Engineers plan for turn around has a numerical error and needs to be revised. The plan needs to include a safety barricade to protect health and property. Please revise the plan and submit it to the Planning Department. • The Planning Department file does not contain a covenant and restriction for the proposed crossover as shown on the site plan. This needs to be submitted in draft form for review by the Town Attorney. Please provide this office with this information as soon as possible. You may contact this office at (631) 765-1938 if you have any additional questions. Re Ily, (3r o on Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC; file 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MEMORANDUM • MAILING ADDRESS: OF s0a11 '. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: yy T Town Hall Annex G C 54375 State Route 25 • �O OIy00 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) fm Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: January 24, 2006 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Erhlich, Robert, SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Status: Final revised site plan. Return by February 8, 2006. In reference to the above, attached you will find a revised site plan document received by the Planning Department and dated January 23, 2006. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. The site plan materials enclosed are for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.All date is pb received date. Site plan dated 1/23/06. �t— Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: T J / / ' 0 0 r--,— Subject: SCTM#: 1000 - ,(f/- S' Date: /— e2 A/— 0 (0 Comments: 1 11 c4,..e "Aa,4,- Yrq� 0,4-,L ✓ l.0 C/ /ht,;, 4- q c rxo f,nlTcEoMo ��m JA N 2 , 2006 soIlbm:d !own PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 January 23, 2006 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Re: Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 Dear Bruno: In accordance with your request enclosed 8 prints of the most recent site plan which incorporates all the items of the August 15, 2005 site plan, revised with new title and bulk parking calculations for "Antiques -Auction Gallery -Arts & Crafts". Site Plan Notes reference the Health Department (number and approval) and NYSDOT (permit number and approval). Copy of original approvals hand delivered with my previous submission. Mr. Verity has reviewed the site plan as described and update the notice of disapproval with the use. As we have previously noted, this Board has had our complete site plan for more than 62 days, the SEQRA must be started and a public hearing held. cc: Mr. Ehrlich (3inicia MCMorore� s, pECE J ^. GI 2 3 I VE 2006 R� FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 10, 2005 AMENDED: January 17, 2006 TO: Robert Erlich 17 Main Avenue Sea Cliff, NY 11579 Please take notice that your application dated December 29, 2005 For permit to open an antique auction gallery, arts and crafts shoe in an existing dwelling at Location of property: 22540 Main Road, Orient County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 18 Block 5 Lot 5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed conversion requires site plan approval from the Southold Town PlanningBoard. oard. This Notice of Disapproval was amended on January 17, 2006 at the request of the applicant. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board JAN 1 3 2006 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING COUNTY OF SUFFOLl STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE January 9, 2006 Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semen, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer 5V& 1 7 2006 THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING.: Pursuant to Section 239L & M of the General Municipal Law, the following site plan which have been submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county -wide or inter -community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or disapproval. Site Plan Robert Ehrlich, Retail Store SCTM No. 1000-18-05-05 NOTE: Does not constitute acceptance of any zoning action(s) associated therewith before any other local regulatory board. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Director of Planning Andrelen , AIC Chief Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORN VIZON ING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2004\239LD. W PD LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR . P. O. BOX 6100 . (631( 853-5190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 TELECOPIER (631( 853-4044 U Ana ''f �•.i` �l yr. o, e� �3> Y `a l rVIR :ate Q ) i )-, !_ IL { p * a s' a _ 3 n y( y E VAN ME f, J_ 16t AWhoIeTlVew.AngJe �n Outdoor `Lighting -Versatility -- Possibilities �r tonco's new FloodPak is the ultimate in exterior lighting versatility. It is the perfect blend of performance, flexibility and architectural design. The FloodPak is three fixtures in one! It's a high performance cutoff luminaire for perimeter and site lighting. Rotate it 22.50 and it's a semi -cutoff luminaire offering forward throw. Rotate it to 450 for floodlighting or turn it over to create indirect/accent lighting —the possibilities are endless. Lowest Installed Cost 1) Fewer Fixtures Required When mounted at 0 degrees, the FloodPak offers a wide Type II distribution with a spacing ratio of up to 6:1. This permits greater spacing between fixtures than conventional wallpack luminaires. Fewer fixtures equals lower cost. 2) Reduced Installation Time The FloodPak features quick and easy installation. By design, the FloodPak installs in half the time as compared with conventional surface and pole mounted lighting products. Faster installation translates into lower labor costs. 3) Less Energy Consumed Because fewer FloodPaks are required, less energy is consumed. Less energy results in lower operation costs. Forward Throw DayForm styling provides consistency in multiple applications. Surface Mount Quickly adjusts to different lighting requirements. Indirect Lighting Maximum versatility from a single outdoor fixture. Facade Lighting Ground -mount for above -horizontal aiming. Site Lighting Pole -mount using shoebox-style arm accessory. Designed to Meet Todays Lighting Challenges Greater Efficiency than Traditional Wallpacks With conventional wallpacks, up to 70%of the available light never reaches its destination. Approximately 40% is lost within the fixture, while an additional 30% is directed outward and upward above 900. The FloodPak's high performance places 80% of the available light down and out where it is needed resulting in fewer fixtures, better lighting and greater savings. Meets Dark Sky and Light Trespass Requirements The FloodPak cutoff luminaire is designed around a high-performance, multifaceted optical system that meets today's strict IESNA Dark Sky requirements. When mounted at 00 the Flood Pak directs all of the light below 90' reducing glare and ensuring compliance to local "Dark Sky' codes. Tipping the Flood Pak up 22.5° redirects the light forward allowing control over light trespass issues. A Family of Fixtures The Flood Pak family is available in three sizes ranging from 70 thru 400 watts. The three distinct sizes ensure correct proportional relationship and architectural DayForm styling that complements most applications. When wall -mounted in the 0° position, the Flood Pak replaces a standard wallpack fixture for use in perimeter and security lighting. The IESNA-rated cutoff optics provide wide distribution with up to 6:1 spacing ratio for maximum distance between fixtures, while meeting stringent Dark Sky requirements. The FloodPak can also be pole mounted for use in site and area lighting with an optional arm, or it can be rotated 180' for dramatic wall -washing effects. Wall Wash Indirect Site Lighting Full Cutoff Photometry See back page for conversion charts FPS15ONLXL-1 a b Is o 16 m r FPM175MAL-8 l 11 = 1s a 1. M x FPL4O0MAL-8 as » 1a n Is a u Ej FloodPak Configurations O° Down 22.5° Down 45° Down O° Up 22.5° Up 45° Up Ordering Logic m m ® 0 - SERIES WATTAGE LAMP SOURCE LAMP VOLTAGE FPS 42 NLX=High Pressure Sodium (NPF) L= Lamp 1=120 70 HFL=Compact Fluorescent Furnished 100 150 HID units supplied with clear medium base lamp. SERIES WATTAGE LAMP SOURCE LAMP VOLTAGE FPM 57 MA=Metal Halide (CWA) L= Lamp 1=120 70 LX=High Pressure Sodium (HX-HPF) Furnished 8=120/ 100 HFL=Compact Fluorescent 208/ 150 PMA=Pulse Start Metal Halide (HX-HPF) 240/ 175 277 HID units supplied with clear medium base lamp. M = m a - o SERIES WATTAGE LAMP SOURCE LAMP VOLTAGE FPL 250 MA=Metal Halide (CWA) L= Lamp 1=120 400- LX=High Pressure Sodium (CWA) Furnished 8=120/208/ Supplied with clear mogul base lamp. 240/277 *Requires reduced outer jacketed lamp. Dimensional Data 0 'ii* L 125-7 11.112- FPL O s- 8. ,2 12-7/8' Rugged Construction Precision die-cast aluminum housing, door frame and mounting box. Duraplex-11 Polyester Powder Finish - Dark bronze standard. Other designer colors available. Easy Access - ---------- Hinged door includes clear tempered glass lens. Integral Heat Sink Ensures cool operation and longer ballast life. Multi -Faceted Reflector Delivers uniform illumination in all positions. Vandal - Resistant -- Captive and tamper - resistant screws. Corrosion -Resistant Hardware All exposed hardware made from stainless steel. Mounting/Wiring Box Rated for 90°C supply wire. Can be surface mounted over various recess boxes or accept'/2" conduit. Also accepts a button photo -control. cUL Listed for Wet Locations Approved for above and below horizontal aiming. DayForm Appearance Stylized daytime architectural design. Injection Molded Silicon Gasket Triple -finger seal prevents leakage in any position. Support Cable -- Permits easy hands -free wiring. Integral Bubble Level -- - Fast positioning of mounting bracket. Multiple Patents Pending Rotating the fixture body to its 22.50 position converts the Flood Pak to semi -cutoff optics with forward -throw distribution resulting in up to 5:1 spacing ratio. When pole mounted at the 22.50 angle, light is directed away from the pole base for greater coverage. It can also be ground mounted for above horizontal aiming and indirect lighting. Pole Mounted Indirect Lighting Semi -Cutoff Photometry See back page for conversion charts FPS15ONLXL-1 r�•r�•rarra:r:•�.ra FPM7 751NAL-8 ff� FPL400MAL-8 's w a u u x u Rotated in the 450 position, the F'loodPak transforms into an all- purpose flood for general lighting. It produces a NEMA 7 x 6 light distribution pattern for applications requiring a wide -beam pattern. In addition to above and below horizontal surface mounting, the FloodPak can be pole mounted as a high -angle flood or ground mounted for facade and accent lighting. Flood Lighting Facade Lighting Flood Photometry See back page for conversion charts FPS15ONLXL-1 ok �i IS 10 15 0 IS N 65 FPM175MAL-8 �I OS W IS 0 15 . A' FPL400MAL-8 mmmmmIrmmm 1■! �I(i���i®ill 1■i�l�»IJII Thinking Outside the Box Stonco developed its packaging to be user-friendly for fixture selection and ease of installation. Z Flexible Installation The FloodPak can be mounted using through -wall wiring or surface -mount 1/2" conduit. Stonco is Always on the Level An auto leveling device is part of every Flood Pak mounting box. Just rotate the box in position on the wall until level and then anchor securely. UL Approved Splice Box The isolated mounting box allows the contractor to use 90"C supply wire. Hands -Free Wiring An integral cable holds the fixture to the installed mounting box, permitting easy hands -free wiring and single -person installation. FloodPak Accessories FPSKNUCKLE 1/2" Adjustable Knuckle (FPS and FPM Series only) FPLKNUCKLE Adjustable 2" Tenon Slipfitter (FPL Series only) FPSARM Shoebox Arm - Converts FloodPak to pole -mount (minimum 4" square pole) FPLARM Shoebox Arm (FPL Series only) Vandal Shield - Helps protect lens and lamp from breakage. Clear polycarbonate shield snaps in place over glass lens. FPSSHIELD FPMSHIELD FPLSHIELD Other Fine Stonco Products FloodPak Photometric Conversions FPS FPM FPL WATTAGE MULTIPLIER WATTAGE MULTIPLIER WATTAGE MULTIPLIER 50 0.25 70 0.36 250 MH 0.57 70 0.4 100 0.57 250 HPS 0.79 100 0.59 150 0.7 400 HPS 1.39 150 1 175 1 400 MH 1 MTG HT MULTIPLIER MTG HT MULTIPLIER MTG HT MULTIPLIER 8 3.5 8 3.5 15 1.78 10 2.3 10 2.3 20 1 15 1 15 1 25 0.64 20 0.6 20 _ 0.6 _ 30 0.44 2 d slowev Union, 800.334 2212 www.floodpak.com wwww.stoncolighting.com �r as GcNLYf= THOMAS Group LLC 10 CATALOG NO. TYPE NO. FloodPak Series FPS JOB NAME Catalog Number. Example: FPS150NLXL-1 SERIES UMP SOURCE FPS- NLX-High FloodPak Pressure Small Sodium LAMP (NPF) 42-42W HFL-Compact L-Lamp 70-70W Fluorescent furnished 100-1GOW 150-15OW HID units supplied with clear medium base lamp. ACCESSORIES FPSKNUCKLE - 1 2" Adjustable Knuckle. FPSARM - Shoebox Ann. Converts FloodPak to pole -mount (minimum 4" square pole). TECHNICAL INFORMATION ` U UL Wet LmMm UstW. 10/03 120 VOLTRGE 1.120V FPSSHIELD - Vandal Shield. Helps protect lens and lamp from breakage. Clear polycarbonate shield snaps in place over glass lens. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS The FloodPak is a perfect blend of architectural design and performance. The FloodPak can be surface mounted in various positions. Use it as a cut-off wallpack or tip it up 22.5 for forward throw with semi -cut-off. Tip it up 45 for floodlighting, or turn R over and use it for indirect/accent lighting. The FloodPak can also be pole mounted or ground mounted using mounting accessories. Precision die cast aluminum construction. All exposed hardware is stainless steel. Duraplex 11 dark bronze polyester powder finish is standard but the RoodPak is available in a variety of designer colors. Hinged door frame with clear tempered glass lens. Mufti -faceted reflection system provides uniform distribution. Injection molded triple finger silicone gasket. UL wet location listed for above or below horizontal aiming. Complete with a UL approved mounting box rated for 90 C supply wire with integral bubble level. Integral heat sink ensures cool operation. Meets IESNA cut-off requirements. Contractor Friendly design with integral cable permfting easy, hands free wiring. Crescenlslonco 120 E. Gimmster Pace Barrington, NJ 08007 856-546-5500 1.5-1 FloodPak Series FPS PHOTOMETHICS ■�����1■Ilf f� Illl 1. I 1■Il;\��I 1NIMMEMINNI 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH FPS15ONLXL-1 ® 0 ■I♦�I♦I♦I♦I♦■ MONOMER 10■l1������ 3MH 2MH 1MH 0 /MH 211AH 3MH FPS15ONLXL-1 ® 45 111,1111AFUDMI ■����mm■ qq 1■■■INv,■1 1■■�111.'�fffJ%�I�II 1■■\ `rA/II 3MH 2MH iMH 0 1MH 2MH 3MH FPS15ONLXL-1 @ 22.5 FOOTCANDLE CORRECTION Multiply the following factors times the footcandle values for changes in mounting height. To Change from 15' New Hight 8' 10, 15, 20' Factor 3.5 2.3 1.0 0.6 LAMP AND WATT CONVERSIONS Lamp 50W 70W 10OW 15OW Multiplier .25 0.4 .59 1.0 0 Down 22.5 Down 45 Down 0 Up 22.5 Up 45 Up CiesceAtglonco 120 E. Glwcester Pike Barrington, NJ 08W7 M-546-5500 t 0/03 January 6, 2006 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Re: Dear Bruno: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11952 Tel:(631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 e a. . Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 I am in receipt of your letter dated October 28, 2006, in accordance with your request the following documents are enclosed: 1. Updated site plan application. Please note that the retail use proposed is "Antiques -Auction Gallery -Arts & Crafts", as we have stated previously the Health Department allows only "dry retail & storage". While the zoning ordinance describes the general category of "retail sale" we have repeatedly stated that the gift shop will emphasize local arts and crafts, including antiques. These uses are specifically identified in the code and the parking schedule gives clear guidance on the number of parking spaces required for retail sales of "Antiques - Auction Gallery -Arts & Crafts". Consequently we have amended our application with these specific uses. 2. The Health Department approval for "dry retail & storage". 3. Long EAR the previous EAF adequately described the project and this EAF is merely a duplication of previously submitted documents. The EAF together with the site plan provides a complete description of the project for the SEQRA review. The structure is existing, merely involves the occupancy of the existing building with a permitted commercial use consistent with the zoning. 4. LWRP - the structure is existing and zoned for general business. The applicant has promoted the purposes of the LWRP by renovating an old house and preserving it's architectural integrity and character. The use proposed is identical to a store within 200 feet of the site and less intensive then the retail food store (Candy Man) in the adjacent commercial property. L • 5. The truck circulation was provided previously: enclosed is a color diagram which clearly describes the 24' delivery truck turn around within the parking lot as well as the written certification describing the methodology used. It is well recognized that UPS type trucks will generally park in a vehicle parking space and larger deliveries are generally scheduled before the store opens in order to avoid interference with the business operation. The trucks have adequate room to turn around without the parking spaces but this practice is highly unlikely. 6. letter to Mr. Verity addressing the fire separation in the existing structure. 7. The State of New York Department of Transportation permit. This application has been opposed by the neighbors. We have enclosed for the record written material prepared by the Orient Association which misrepresents the application and opposes a permitted use. We feel that this application is being unfairly and arbitrarily treated due to the vocal opposition. Furthermore, the adjacent owner took down a 6 foot fence along the rear of his property when we pointed out that we would be providing a second 6 foot fence and double row of evergreens. My client's property fronts New York State Route 25, which has been the subject of much attention due to the Cross Sound Ferry Traffic. The proposed use is less intensive than the adjacent retail store next door. The Candy Man not only sells retail (very popular candy and gifts) but also manufactures the food on site. The Candy Man is at least 1000 square feet of retail (more than double what my client proposes) and has their off-street parking along Route 25 which require vehicles and delivery trucks to back onto Rt. 25. Also within 300 feet of this site is another smaller retail shop. I am not aware of site plan review and approval for either the Candy Man or the retail shop to the west of the Candy Man. All of these businesses adjoin residentially zoned property and they have no planted buffers or fences. The Town has never directed either of these business properties to buffer the parking adjacent to the residentially zoned parcels or curtail their business. We comply with the Code: we have provided a transition buffer (100-213) to "provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings". The adjacent residential property by removing his 6' fence now enjoys the noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion by the Ferry traffic and adjacent commercial stores. Since he voluntarily removed this protection, he apparently does not object to the noise, headlight glare and commercial activity which all properties suffer on Route 25. As we have stated in prior communications, the Ehrlich site plan adequately addresses all the site plan issues. The retail sales are conducted inside a well constructed house, recently renovated with updated materials (including insulation which buffers noise) , the site plan shows a planted double row of evergreens, a solid 6 foot stockade fence, lighting fixtures on the building are directed down and are typical residential light fixtures. The owner has preserved 50% of the site as landscape. In addition, the residential dwellings have their own landscaping and structures which i r block the noise, light and views into their dwellings. The King property has a mature 6' hedge which surrounds the property and the Constance property has a shed and a two story garage almost on our rear property line, in addition he had a 6 foot stockade fence on his property which he recently removed. Nevertheless, we would be installing our own stockade fence. In addition, we have directed pedestrian flow from the adjacent retail stores to the front sidewalks and offered multiple parking alternatives. This Board has had our complete site plan for more than 62 days, we received Health Department and NYSDOT permit, we therefore demand a public hearing. ru o s, Pa is C. Moore cc: Mr. Ehrlich 0 • Mkhael Mapes, RE November 16, 2005 Town Of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Planning Department Re: Orient Gift Shop Owner: Robert Ehrlich SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Semon, Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone: 631-369-2170 The purpose of this memo is to respond to your comment in the letter dated October 28, 2005 addressed to Ms. Moore with respect to the truck turn circulation. Please find the attached drawing dated November 17, 2005 which illustrates a UPS -type delivery truck turning around in the parking lot. The drawing shows how a 24-foot delivery truck can easily turn around in the parking area based on a turning radius of 31.8 feet. Please also refer to the previous a memo dated October 6, 2005 which also addresses this issue. If there are any questions please feel free to call me at 369-2170. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E. Mkhael Mapes, P.E. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone:631-369-2170 October 6, 2005 Town Of Southold P.O. Box 1179 . of Nl; py Southold, N.Y. 11971 fie( GNp El D. �9 Attn: Bruno Semon, Planning Department * �� Re: Orient Gift Shop 0 i Owner: Robert Ehrlich Za SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Semon, In response to your request the following is an analysis of a delivery truck turning radius and traffic flow. The stated concern of the Planning Board is that a UPS -type delivery truck or customer vehicles may not be able to turn around after entering the parking lot if the parking spaces are full. I based my study on the worst case scenario that all parking spaces are full and the cars or trucks would need to turn around in the area near the dumpster. I also used the curb -to -curb turning radius to determine how much room is required for a vehicle turn around. The curb - to -curb turning radius for a vehicle is the smallest radius the vehicle can turn without having the front wheels go over the curbs on either side of a street. Thus, a vehicle with a 25-foot curb -to -curb turning radius can turn around in a 50-foot-wide street without the front wheels going over the curbs. The area on site for turning around can accommodate a curb -to -curb turning radius of 18.0 feet. The curb -to -curb turning radius for a typical 24-foot UPS type delivery truck is 31.8 feet and would be required to do a five point turn in this area to turn around. Several other cars and SUV's were also evaluated for their turning radius. The Chevy Tahoe, a popular full-size SUV, has one of the largest turning radiuses for trucks in this size and has a curb -to -curb turning radius of 20.3 feet. The Tahoe would be required to do a three point turn in order to turn around. Most passenger type cars range from 16.5 to 17.5 feet and would be able to turn around in this area without backing up. Furthermore, the site plan could be modified to move the dumpster to the back buffer area and remove some landscaping in the present dumpster area to provide a larger curb -to -curb turning radius. This modification would increase the curb -to -curb radius to 19.5 feet. The site plan dated July 1, 2005, submitted previously, provided for a space designated solely for a turn around, however, the Planning Board rejected this plan and asked that we reduce the parking area and increase the buffer. The site plan dated May 4, 2005 provided more than 40 feet of area for turning around a vehicle and this plan was also rejected. If there are any questions please feel free to call me at 344-2841. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E. PERM 4: 9/05) JJ STATESPEW YORK DEA4I.NT OF TRANSPORTOPN HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT 10-05-0458 Permit Fee: $ 550.00 Insurance Fee: $ 175.00 Total Received: $ 725.00 Check or M.O. No.: 1087/1089 'Permihee: ROEM EHRLICH P.O.BOX 326 SEA CLIE'E, MY 11579 att: Billing Address: (complete if different from above) Permit No. Project Identification No.: Expiration Date: SH No. Deposit Rec. for $ Check or M.O. No.: Dated: Estimated Cost of Work Performed in the State Right -of -Way $ Chargeable to Bond No.: or Undertaking on File: 10-05- 0458 07/01/2006 8380 5000.00 178113687 10/11/2005 0.00 ($ 0.00) Return of Deposit Made Payable to: (complete if different from Permihee) Under the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law, permission is hereby granted to the permittee to: Contruct i permanently maintain commercial access on sjs/oRt 25 between MR's 1714-1115 1 other incidental work per ttached plans i specs. All work shall be to satisfaction of RE. All work shall be done in accordance with approved Lars or AODEA &PT shall be responsibility of the permittee until completion of all work, etc... THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. ANYONE WORKING IN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR HIGH VISIBILITY APPAREL (ORANGE/YELLOW) AND A HARD HAT. County FFOLK SOUTHOLD Municipality - 25 Route # - as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated therein, if required; and pursuant to the conditions and regulations general or special, and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit. Dateq,Ati I3�25 n N.Y. Date EUGENE SMITH Commissioner of Transportation By ,mrvn,nn, THIS PERMIT, WITH APPLICATION AND DRAWING (OR COPIES THEREOF) ATTACHED SHALL BE PLACED IN THE HANDS OF THE CONTRACTOR BEFORE ANY WORK BEGINS. THE HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS COMPLETION, THE PERMITTEE ABSOLUTELY MUST NOTIFY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER, KEVIN MATTHAEI 19H COUNTY RD 158 (631)127-1731 RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901 UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AUTHORIZED, THE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED, SIGNED BY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of deposit or return/release of bond is requested. DATE PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT (If Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse side of this form must be completed. ❑ Refund of Deposit is authorized ❑ Return of Bond is authorized ❑ Mailing address of refund has been verified. ❑ Amount charged against Bond may be released ❑ Retain Bond for future permits If different, list new address below, ❑ Forfeit of Guarantee Deposit is authorized gtgten64, @they I•• DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. ❑ Permit closed ❑ Bond returned/released ❑ Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized ❑ Forfeit Guarantee Deposit to NYSDOT ❑ Other DATE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER The issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit at its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permihee will cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto unitl all work under the permit is satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from work performed pursuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporation, municipality, or state department or agency, and his or its successors in interest, shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of such work or portion of such work as set forth within the terms and conditions of the work permit. Q�, N ,J� HULK YAKKING UAL4ULATIUNS' USE ARES # SPACES REQ'D PER CODE CES PROVIDED .RETAIL SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 200 S.F. AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: V=ARC ROOF V=1327 X 0.17 X 1 = 226 C.F. 226/42.24 FOR 8' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. DRYWELL STONE PARKING AREA V = 3846 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 392 C.F. CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK V = 572 X 0.17 X 1 = 98 C.F. TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE 392 C.F. + 98 C.F. = 490 C.F. V = 490/42.24 FOR 8' DIA RINGS = 12' REQUIRED 8' DIA TOTAL DEPTH = 12' NEW YORK STATE ,,7= • a DEFT. OIL TRA SITE DATE: oy TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 18' PROVIDE 3 - 8' DIA. X 5' DEEP AND 1-8' DIA. X 3' DEEP DRYWELLS DRYWELLS #1, #2 AND #3 SHALL BE 5' DEEP DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS 6" RCA SUBASE IN 2" STONE HANDICAP PAKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 ]FICATIONS Michael Mapes,P.E. kPART 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 PHONE 369-2170 15-2005 TITLE: ORIENT GIFT SHOP J ROAD SITE PLAN J.Y. 11957 sm 1000-18-5-5 SITE `�v. 1579 D DRAMNG NUMBER D O Michael Mapes, P.E Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone: 631-369-2170 November 18, 2005 Town Of Southold Building Department Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Michael Verity Re: Robert Ehrlich Dry Retail Store 22540 Main Road Orient, N.Y. Dear Mr. Verity, The purpose of this letter is to address your concern over fire separations between proposed uses within the building. The existing floor plans of the building show an open ceiling extending to the second floor over the sales area There is a storage area on the second floor with railing creating a common open area to the first floor sales area A continuous wall replacing the railed section will satisfy the fire separation requirements. The owner is willing to do the necessary upgrades to the building to satisfy fire code issues upon approval of the site plan. At that time a certification and or construction plans detailing fire separations will be supplied. If there are any questions please feel free to call me at 631-369-2170. Sincerely, ��J '//J�/J o '/�`� Michael Mapes, P.E. E 8 7 6 S 4 3 2 D D 6 ao NOTE S: 31.8' Q 1. TYPICAL DELIVERY TRUCK DIMENSIONS 24' LONG X 7.1' WIDE WITH 176" WHEELBASE Q2. LAYOUT BASED ON 31.8' TURNING RADIUS 3. NUMBERING AND COLOR CODE SHOW TRUCK TURNING AROUND 5 WITH A FIVE POINT TURN AT EACH POINT WHERE THE TRUCK 3 STOPS TO EITHER GO FORWARD OR REVERSE. ' r �aE` D. .... 0 �P� .................................. ............................ B 3Y Kui ................ O ui 6 / 2 F)A 07050 ............ % OF ESSIO Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: EHRLICH GIFT SHOP A TRUCK TURN AROUND LAYOUT A SIZE TRUCK TURN AROUND REV. e DDRAWING NUMBER t SHEET OF ] DATE:I ]-1%ZOOS SCALE: 1"=16' 11 8 7 6 S 4 3 2 1 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 29, 2005 Mr. Andrew P. Freleng, AICP Suffolk County Dept. of Planning P.O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788 Dear Mr. Freleng: RE: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store SC Tax Map # 1000-18-5-5 SCPD file No.: SD-05-Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 In response to your November 21 letter, enclosed are the following: ❖ Site Plan dated 4/15/05 ❖ Survey by John C. Ehlers Please review the enclosed material and provide us with your recommendations. Thank you. Sincerely, 4rS n Senior Site Plan Reviewer Encs. i • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING November 21, 2005 Town of Southold Planning Bd. 53095 Main Road - P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Re: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store SCTM No.: 1000-18-5-5 SCPC File No.: SD-05-Inc. Gentlemen: THOMAS ISLES, AICP DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Please be advised that pursuant to Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following applications will not be reviewed until the following information is submitted through the offices of the municipal referring agency. Copy of site plan (none forwarded with referral) Thank you. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles, AICP Direct ofPl iI i ot� drew P. Freleng, P Chief Planner APF:cc G:\CCHORNY\ZONING\ZONING\WORKING\INC\2005\BRO5.FEB 'nt)5 LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISON BLDG. - 4TH FLOOR . P. O. BOX 6100 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788-0099 • (516) 853-5190 TELECOPIER (516) 853-4044 Orient November 21, 2005 Fire District Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Sir: .\)CE 1%o j The Orient Board of Fire Commissioner's have reviewed your letter of October 28, 2005 regarding the site plan for alteration of an existing 1929 sq. ft two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq. ft. of misc. space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w comer ofNYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 The Board of Fire Commissioners have no additional requirements and/or recommendations for fire access. Sincerely, Edward Loper,eWrea"surer Orient Fire District "OV 2 3 23300 Main Road ♦ Orient, NY 11957 ♦ (631) 323-2445 ♦ Fax (631) 323-9706 ' 0 • PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SOpryolo MAILING ADDRESS: P.OoNY111971 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Southold, Chair ho��OF LOCATION: WILLIOFFICE M J. S N Town Hall Annex ENNE EDWARCREME KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR � p 54375 State Route 25 GEORGE D. SOLOMON (cor. Main Rd. Youngs Ave.) COU,M'N.�1� n' 1 Southold, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 28, 2005 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee, c/o Southo Town Clerk From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Please respond on your agency's position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File attachment PLANNING BOARD MEMB46 RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN x New _Change of Use Re -use _Extension _Revision of Approved Site Plan /� Name of Business or Site: !1 Oigex r Location: a215 `/ IY9 4-11l tee 410 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed Filing Fee �CCt /✓ '11-91 o 22C) - Address: 0121 cv-71 7- Name of Applicant: K,D Py fSYLr �y12 L 1 C H Address of Applicant: /0 52 / 1 0 b Ly v l9 Vas Telephone: } GL/ ?°. ] 5 Owner of Land: Q01-be 2..-r eHg_1 .t Cq Agent or Person responsible for application: 2 -4- --c-C I -A- c. f-ti O C) Address: _ .510 20 1i�,9 sN 2oH P Telephone: _ 6001—H o L o // 57 1 7k - y3 3a Site plans prepared by: _7oHAI 45-H S License No.: Address: //5OZ02 _ !D �1 /7y41N ST, 2iVFXL1{�g� Telephone: c3 (o !- _ �- FE3 Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOUC /yy j4tT 2cu^+— c . /XOO K-6 4O6tY_T iFHRL! Gf1- being duly sworn, deposes and says thatgle resides at In the State of New York, and that he Is the6wne off the above property, or that he is the O Ar_AA.... _of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.) Which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the tide to the entire parcel, including all rights -of -way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the plans submitted-- - Slgnecy �f� !� �--'--� wnerl Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) SwofTl to me this i day of // (Notiry MOO MARGAREr C. RUTKOWSIG Notary Public, State of New York No.4982628 QualfBed In Suffolk Couniv Commission Expire& June 9,Zo_� Page 3 Planning Board Slte Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) (Jj Zoning District Existing Use of Site V F1CA-AJT 'r>W F L-u NJ Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which buildini will have which use. If more than one use is proposed per building, indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserveoer use. , i fr a (eOO "Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) (e &oo sy Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) _ Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by r4/A Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other "a WIII any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAYBE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OFSITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. JRN 10 105 10:22RM SOUTE4 BUILDING 631 765 950E P.1 raRM No. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 10, 2005 TO: Robert Erlich 17 Main Avenue, rN,, Sea Cliff, NY 11579 Piease talce notice that your application dated December. 29, 2005 For permit to open a retail show in an,existing dwelli at Location of property: 22540 a lioad. C1rent C:ounty'lax Map No, 1000 - Section 1$ Block 5 Lot 5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the, following grounds; The Proposed conversion rE u.lros site plan approval, from the Southold Town 'Planning Board, Authorized Siguaiuie !Vote to Applicant: Any, change or deviation to the above «.u: v.Acett application, may require, further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC. file, Planning Board 34- Jr F1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON October 28, 2005 Mr. Edward Loper, sr. Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 MAILING ADDRESS: aQf SO(/T yQ/ P.O. Box 1179 h0� O# Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex • 54375 State Route 25 Q lyCOMM (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) N Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1936 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Loper: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan dated August 15, 2005. This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours run em n Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. • 6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS OF sour MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE �Q Southold, NY 11971 Chair Xz .If. T OFFICE LOCATION: WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS w Q Town Hall Annex 54375 MARTIN H. SIDOR 'O �0 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. &Youngs Ave.) GEORGE D. SOLOMON �yCOUrm,��' 1111 Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 28, 2005 Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM: # 1000-18-5-5 Dear Ms. Moore: We are in receipt of you letter dated October 13, 2005 and the engineer's response to the truck turn circulation issue. Attached you will find a complete site plan application package. The following identified items need to be addressed: • Attached is a copy of the site plan application submitted to the Planning Department. Please update and submit the revised application to reflect the current site plan dated 8/15/05. • The Environmental Assessment Form submitted has discrepancies and will require a revision to reflect the current application. Please update the EAF and submit it to the Planning Department. • Execute and submit the L.W.R.P. assessment form. • Add the truck turn circulation information to the site plan with dimensions. • At the request of Building Department submit a Design Professional Certification or a set of preliminary construction plans detailing the fire use separation between all proposed building uses. Please refer to our letter dated September 28, 2005 and note the Planning Board still remains greatly concerned about providing the maximum buffer with the residential uses abutting the site. The site plan must further address this important issue. 1] Our records indicate that you have overpaid the Town of Southold by $ 330.00 on the site plan fee. To request a refund, please write to the Town Board care of the Town Clerk. Our file does not contain the SCDHS approval or the NYS DOT approved curb cut permit, please submit the approvals to the Planning Department. Please provide this office with this information as soon as possible. You may contact this office at (631) 765-1938 if you have any additional questions. RZo'n Br Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC; file Attachment 6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MEMORANDUM r7 MAILING ADDRESS: SOUr P.O. Box 1179 �OF Southold, NY 11971 T T OFFICE LOCATION: H Town Hall Annex • O 54375 State Route 25 O l�COURN (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Date: October 28, 2005 To: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Jamie Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Status: New application In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification. This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 Site plan enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared dated 08/15/05 r'1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON October 28, 2005 Mr. Edward Loper, sr. Orient Fire District 23300 Main Road Orient, NY 11957 MAILING ADDRESS: �QF S yOIO P.O.O(/� Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 h0� OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G • 0 54375 State Route 25 �yCOUNM (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Loper: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan dated August 15, 2005. This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours Iffrun ern n Senior Site Plan Reviewer enc. 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON 0 QF so ycourm,�`� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: October 28, 2005 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Planning Department Architectural Review Committee, c/o Southold (Town Clerk From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewe Re: Agency Referral requests required under Southold Town Code Article XXV 100-254 Review Procedure part C the Planning Board refers this site plan for concerns, comments and Jurisdiction requirements if applicable. Dear Reviewer: The site plan status is a New Active Site Plan. Below is site plan application information pertaining to the listed project: Ehrlich, Robert Retail Store 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 Attached is a copy of the site plan application for your review. Please respond on your agency's position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File attachment A Is �7 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Re: Dear Bruno: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 October 13, 2005 Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 /35 VL� Margaret Rutkowski Secretary In accordance with your request enclosed please find the certification from Michael Mapes, PE. which certifies that a UPS truck can make a complete turn -around within the parking area. As you recall there have been at least two different site plans for this gift shop which provided traffic circulation within the property, however, the Board rejected those alternate plans. My client is being unequally treated. The proposed gift shop is no different than the candy gift shop next door. In fact "The Candy Man" not only sells retail (very popular candy and gifts) but also manufactures on site. The Candy Man is at least 1000 square feet of retail (more than double what my client proposes) and has their off-street parking along Route 25 which require vehicles to back onto Rt. 25 . Also within 300 feet of this site is another smaller retail shop. I am not aware of site plan review and approval for either the Candy Man or the retail shop to the west of the Candy Man. All of these businesses adjoin residentially zoned property and they have no planted buffers. The Town has never directed either of these business properties to buffer the parking adjacent to the residentially zoned parcels. Moreover, the stated purpose of a transition buffer (100-213) is to "provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings" The impact on noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion is completely eliminated by my client's proposed site plan- the retail sales are conducted inside a well constructed house, the site plan shows a planted double row of evergreens, a solid 6 foot stockade fence, lighting fixtures on the building are directed down and are typical residential light fixtures. In addition, the residential dwellings have their own landscaping and structures which block the noise, light and views into their dwellings. The King property has a mature 6' hedge which surrounds the property and the Constance property has a shed and two story garage almost on our rear property line which block the views of his dwelling, in addition he had a 6 foot stockade fence on his property which I am told he recently removed in an attempt to further influence the Board. Nevertheless, we would be installing our own stockade fence. In addition, we have directed pedestrian flow from the adjacent retail stores to the front sidewalks and offered multiple parking alternatives. As you know this property fronts on New York State Rt.25, the State of New York Department of Transportation has issued a curb cut permit and my client has forwarded the required fees to the State. There are numerous examples of site plans approved adjacent to residential parcels which have been approved with less buffering than what we have proposed. We await your continued review and the scheduling of a public hearing. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. t amours a cia C. Moore cc: Mr. Ehrlich Michael Mapes, P.E. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone: 631-369-2170 October 6, 2005 Town Of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Planning Department Re: Orient Gift Shop Owner: Robert Ehrlich SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Mr. Semon, OCT 1 4 2005 In response to your request the following is asp analysis of a delivery truck turrj ng radius and traffic flow. The stated concern of the Planning Board is that a UPS -type delivery truck or customer vehicles may not be able to turn around after entering the parking lot if the parking spaces are full I based my study on the worst case scenario that all parking spaces are full and the cars or trucks would need to turn around in the area near the dumpster. I also used the curb -to -curb turning radius to determine how much room is required for a vehicle turn around. The curb - to -curb turning radius for a vehicle is the smallest radius the vehicle can turn without having the front wheels go over the curbs on either side of a street. Thus, a vehicle with a 25-foot curb -to -curb turning radius can turn around in a 50-foot-wide street without the front wheels going over the curbs. The area on site for tinning around can accommodate a curb -to -curb turning radius of 18.0 feet. The curb -to -curb turning radius for a typical 24-foot UPS type delivery truck is 31.8 feet and would be required to do a five point turn in this area to turn around. Several other cars and SUV's were also evaluated for their turning radius. The Chevy Tahoe, a popular full-size SUV, has one of the largest turning radiuses for trucks in this size and has a curb -to -curb turning radius of 20.3 feet. The Tahoe would be required to do a three point turn in order to turn around. Most passenger type cars range from 16.5 to 17.5 feet and would be able to turn around in this area without backing up. Furthermore, the site plan could be modified to move the dumpster to the back buffer area and remove some landscaping in the present dumpster area to provide a larger curb -to -curb turning radius. This modification would increase the curb -to -curb radius to 19.5 feet. S%lrof- PIF Tf V1- 0 ' The site plan dated July 1, 2005, submitted previously, provided for a space designated solely for a turn around, however, the Planning Board rejected this plan and asked that we reduce the parking area and increase the buffer. The site plan dated May 4, 2005 provided more than 40 feet of area for turning around a vehicle and this plan was also rejected. If there are any questions please feel free to call me at 344-2841. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E.NV 705 'o �� Fa_ 00�/ 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 28, 2005 Ms. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM: # 1000-18-5-5 Dear Ms. Moore: 1bMAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 Thank you for attending the Work Session on Monday, September 26, 2005. As you know, the Planning Board decided to authorize the staff to begin the formal review process for the above referenced site plan. Please note that this office has not received the drawings or analysis from M. Mapes, P.E. regarding the truck turning and circulation within the parking area. This information is critical for the Planning Board to continue its review. In addition, the current proposed site plan is not in compliance with the landscape buffer requirements of Town Code section 100-213 for the B zoning district. While considerable discussion about the landscaping ensued at the work session, please note that the Planning Board remains greatly concerned about providing the maximum buffer with the residential uses abutting the site. The site plan must further address this important issue. Please provide this office with this information as soon as possible. You may contact this office at (631) 765-1938 if you have any additional questions. ully. Z tor UEplat Hier Site Plan Reviewer CC; file 0 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 September 16, 2005 Attn: Denise Heyse, Planner Trainee Southold Town Planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold NY 11971 RE: ROBERT EHRLICH RETAIL STORE SCTM: 1000-18-5-5 Dear Ms. Heyse: With reference to the above, enclosed please find a copy of the recorded Covenants and Restrictions. Thank you and please do not hesitate to call should Betsy by encls. C: Mr. Robert Ehrlich �llT!I , LA SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK RECORDS OFFICE RECORDING PAGE Type of Instrument: DECLARATION/DOP Recorded: Number of Pages: 8 At: Receipt Number : 05-0095847 LIBER: PAGE: District: Section: Block: 1000 018.00 05.00 EXAMINED AND CHARGED AS FOLLOWS Received the Following Fees For Above Instrument Exempt Page/Filing $24.00 NO Handling COE $5.00 NO NYS SRCHG TP-584 $0.00 NO Notation Cert.Copies $5.20 NO RPT SCTM $0.00 NO Fees Paid THIS PAGE IS A PART OF THE INSTRUMENT THIS IS NOT A BILL 09/13/2005 12:48:38 PM D00012408 961 Lot: 005.000 Edward P.Romaine County Clerk, Suffolk County Exempt $5.00 NO $15.00 NO $0.00 NO $30.00 NO $84.20 2 Number of pages TORRENS Serial # LEA;;:;. OF _UF FUIk:: CUIiJ 'r' Certificate # Prior Ctf. # c Deed . Mortgage Instrument ©— Deed / Mortgage Tax Stamp FEES Recording / Filing Stamps Page / Filing Fee Mortgage Amt. _ Handling 5.20 1. Basic Tax — 2. Additional Tax _ TP-584 _ _ Sub Total _ Notation Spec. / Assit. — q or EA-5217 (County) _ — Sub Total / Spec. / Add. — TOT. MTG. TAX EA-5217 (State) _ Dual Town _ Dual County _ R.P.T.S.A. P 74UR Held for Appointment _ Transfer Tax Comm. of Ed. 5. 00 a �' — Mansion Tax _ Affidavit �� The property covered by this motgage is or will be improved by a one or two Certified Cop /�G family dwelling only. Reg. PY Co To Sub dal 5-5 YESor NO _ — IS� [f CJ _ If NO, see appropriate tax clause on Other _ _ Grand Total / page # of this instrument. -3 0 4 1 District1000 Section 018.00 Block 05.00 Lot 005.000 5 Community Preservation Fund Real Property 1000 01800 0500 005000 Consideration Amount $ n/a Tax Service P T S CPF Tax Due $ 0 Agency F2 LPA A Verification 13 SEP-05 Improved JSatisfaction/Discharges/Release List Property Owners Mailing Address RECORD & RETURN TO: PATRICIA C. MOORE ESQ 51020 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD NY 11971 Vacant Land TD TD TD 17 1 Title Company Information Title # PAC3661 8 Suffolk County Recording & Endorsement Page This page forms part of the attached DECLARATION OF COVENANTS & RESTRICTIONS made by: (SPECIFY TYPE OF INSTRUMENT) ROBERT E14RLICH The premisis herein is situated in SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK. TO In the Township of SOUTHOLD SUFFOK COUNTY In the VILLAGE DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES or HAMLET of ORIENT BOXES 6 THROUGH 8 MUST BE TYPED OR PRINTED IN BLACK INK ONLY PRIOR TO RECORDING OR Frr.rtar; DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THIS DECLARATION made this 13'" day of July, 2005 by ROBERT EHRLICH, residing at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New York 11579, hereinafter referred to as the DECLARANT, as the owner of premises described in Schedule "A" annexed hereto (hereinafter referred to as the PREMISES) desires to restrict the use and enjoyment of said PREMISES and has for such purposes determined to impose on said PREMISES covenants and restrictions and does hereby declare that said PREMISES shall be held and shall be conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions: 1. DECLARANT has made application to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) for a permit to construct, approval of plans or approval of a subdivision or development on the PREMISES. 2. The DECLARANT appeared before the Board of Review requesting a variance to be able to install a sanitary system which does not conform to the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code's construction standards that require the distance between sanitary systems and shallow private wells be at least 150 feet and the Board of Review of the County of Suffolk Department of Health Services granted a waiver by letter dated May 20, 2005, attached hereto and made a part hereof, provided a covenant is filed, the DECLARANT, its successors, heirs or assigns, agrees: a. As a condition of approval by the DEPARTMENT of the application, the DECLARANT covenants that the first floor of the building may be used for dry retail purposes only with no food service, and the second story and cellar may be used as storage space only. 3. The DECLARANT, its successors and/or assigns shall set forth these covenants, agreements and declarations in any and all leases to occupants, tenants and/or lessees of the above described property and shall, by their terms, subject same to the covenants and restrictions contained herein. Failure of the DECLARANT, its successors and/or assigns to so condition the leases shall not invalidate their automatic subjugation to the covenants and restrictions. 4. All of the covenants and restrictions contained herein shall be construed to be in addition to and not in derogation or limitation upon any provisions of local, state, and federal laws, ordinances, and/or regulations in effect at the time of execution of this agreement, or at the time such laws, ordinances, and/or regulations may thereafter be revised, amended, or promulgated. 5. This document is made subject to the provisions of all laws required by law or by their provisions to be incorporated herein and they are deemed to be incorporated herein and made a part hereof, as though fully set forth. 6. The aforementioned Restrictive Covenants shall be enforceable by the County of Suffolk, State of New York, by injunctive relief or my any other remedy in equity or at law. The failure of said agencies or the County of Suffolk to enforce the same shall not be deemed to affect the validity of this covenant nor to impose any liability whatsoever upon the County of Suffolk or any officer or employee thereof. 7. These covenants and restrictions shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the DECLARANT, its successors and assigns, and upon all persons or entities claiming under them, and may be terminated, revoked or amended only with the written consent of the DEPARTMENT. 8. If any section„ subsection, paragraph, clause, phrase or provision of these covenants and restrictions shall, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, be adjudged illegal, unlawful, invalid, or be held to unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of these covenants as a whole, or any other part or provision hereof other than the part so adjudged to be illegal, unlawful, invalid, or unconstitutional. 9. Local Law #32-1980- The DECLARANT represents and warrants that he has not offered or given any gratuity to any official, employee, or agent of Suffolk County, New York State, or of any political party, with the purpose or intent of securing favorable treatment with respect to the performance of an agreement, and that such person has read and is familiar with the provisions of Local Law #32-1980. ; i ROBERT EHRLICHHH State of New York ) ss: County of NASK,9 / On this /3 day of July, 2005, before, the undersigned, personally appeared ROBERT EHRLICH, personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to the be individual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s), or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) ted, executed the instrument. ry Public N� ° o Now Hp01HE505W122 , Comm"lon Explies Mfll 15, 20 4 STATE OF NEW YORK • SS: ^OUNTY OF SUFFOLK I EDWARD P. ROMAINE, CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY (SAID COURT BEING A COURT OF RECORD) DO HEREBY CE TIFY THAT I HAVE COMPARED THE ANNEXED COPY OF DEED LIBER Gc�4og AT PAGE 9 (o i ED AND THAT IT IS A JUST AND TRUE COPY O HCUSF ORIGINALDEp OF THE WHOLE THEREOF. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, ,AFFIXED THE SEAL OF SAID I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND COUNTY AND COURT THIS 13 kh DAY OF Sep4an b �, a�S- �� I+LtFYI� • 12-0189. 128]ry • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK c SU STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERV CEB May 20, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 COPY BRI.w L. HARPER, M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER Subject: Board of Review Hearing —July 10, 2003 C10-02-0016 -- Orient Coffee Company, s/w/c Village Lane and Route 25, Orient — t/o Southold — SCTM: 1000 01800 0500 005000 Dear Mr. Mapes: Enclosed is a copy of the findings, recommendations and determination of the Board of Review concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance/waiver with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting of this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise, your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. Ve ly yours, Step A. Costa, )?.E., Chief Engineer Chairman, Board of Review Enclosure C: Board of Review File — Riverhead Mr. Bruce Williamson — Div, of Public Health Mr. John Fitzgerald -- Reviewer -- Reviewer William & Evelyn Hines Living Trust Mr. Andrew Freleng -- Planning Department Mr. Jeffrey & Ms. Claudia King Ms. Lauretta Fischer -- Planning Department Ms. Allyson Constant Ms. Eileen Canton — OWM •DNISION OF ENVIRONMEMAL OUALR ♦ BOARD OF REVIEW 1 220 RABRO DRNE EAST ♦ HAUPPAUGE W 1 1768 P..r. 4631) 853-3056 Fix (631) 653-3075 SUFFOLK ANTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHIRVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD OF REVIEW ARTICLE 2, SECTION 2205 SUFFOLK COUNTY SANITARY CODE To: Brian L. Harper, M.D., M.P.H., Commissioner From: Stephen A. Costa, P.E., Chairman, Board of Review Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-02-0016 — Orient Coffee Company, s/w/c Village Lane and Route 25, Orient — t/o Southold -- SCTM: 1000 01800 0500 005000 Hearing Date: July 10, 2003 AMENDED FINDINGS Statement of Problem Construction standards require that the distance between sanitary systems and shallow private wells be at least 150 feet. The applicant is proposing installing the sanitary system less than 150 feet from a private well. Water standards require a minimum of 40 feet of water in a well casing. The on -site well for this project has less than 40 feet of water in the casing. Findin¢s and Facts 1. The applicant wishes to convert an existing single-family residence to a take-out coffee bar and restaurant. 2. The parcel size is 0.28 acre and is located in Groundwater Management Zone 4. 3. Design flow for the project is 300 gallons per day (gpd), which includes 240 gpd of kitchen flow and 60 gpd of sanitary flow. Yield at density is 84 gpd. The project conforms to density requirements. 4. Soil conditions are good, with 3.5 ft. of loam and 3.5-9 ft, of coarse sand & gravel, and sand deeper. 5. Depth to groundwater is 16 ft. 6. The variances requested are as follows: a. Proposed well i. 88 feet from proposed sewage disposal system ii. Shallow, less than 40 feet of water in the well b. Proposed sewage disposal system i. 88 feet from proposed on -site well ii. 93 feet from existing well on the lot to the southeast iii. 101 feet from existing well on the lot to the south iv. 66 feet from existing well on the lot to the west. 7. According to an engineering report submitted by the applicant, groundwater flow is toward the southwest. Brian L. Harper, M.D., AH, Commissioner • Hearing Date: July 10, 2003 Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-02-0016 — Orient Coffee Company, s/w/c Village Lane and Route 25, Orient— t/o Southold— SCTM: 1000 01800 0500 005000 8. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing single cesspool with a new sewage system consisting of a grease trap, septic tank and leaching pool. 9. The proposed well will be 50 feet total depth with 34 feet of water in the well. Standards require at least 40 feet of water in the well. The proposed well cannot be made deeper due to the presence of chlorides. 10. Department and state health standards require that this site operate a noncommunity public water supply in order to serve the public. 11. A memorandum is on file from Robert Farmer, P.E., supervisor of the Drinking Water Unit, which states that the project is not recommended for approval as a noncommunity public water supply. This is based on the distance from the proposed on -site sewage disposal system to the well and the shallow depth of the well. The memorandum also notes that recent water analyses from nearby private wells show a general trend of elevated nitrates with some traces of ammonia, indicating possible sewage impacts to the groundwater. The memo also notes that there is a plume of contamination from MTBE south of this project. 12. A water analysis from a test well on the site showed the water met drinking water standards, although there was a trace of ammonia found. 13. A letter is on file from the Town of Southold Planning Office that states that the town did not have a site plan application pending and that in their opinion the site and location of the proposed use was insufficient to support the intensity of the change of use. Mr. Bruno Semon, senior site planner reviewer for the Southold Town Planning Board also appeared at the hearing to reinforce that position and to request a coordinated SEQRA review. 14. Two neighboring property owners appeared at the hearing and another forwarded a letter to the board. All expressed concerns over the impact a business operation on the site would have on their wells. 15. The engineer for the owner submitted a letter to the department dated April 5, 2005 that included a request for a change in use to convert the existing single-family dwelling to a dry retail store on the first floor with the basement and second floor being used as storage space. 16. The total design sewage flow, according to current department standards, for the site used in the above manner would be 72 gpd instead of 300 gpd for use as a single-family residence. 17. The engineer performed a recent inspection of the existing subsurface sewage system as a result of sanitary problems. The system was found to be a red brick 6-foot diameter cesspool with a depth of 4 feet and an effective depth of only 2 feet. The cesspool was also starting to collapse. Brian L. Harper, M.D., O.H., Commissioner • Hearing Date: July 10, 2003 Subject: Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-02-0016 — Orient Coffee Company, s/w/c Village Lane and Route 25, Orient— t/o Southold— SCTM: 1000 01800 0500 005000 18. The site plan submitted proposes a new sanitary system with increased clearances to neighboring wells. In addition, a 1,500-gallon septic tank will be added as well as an 8- foot it by 12-foot effective depth leaching pool. Determination The Board denied the original request based on the following: There are shallow wells downgradient from the proposed sewage disposal system. In accordance with §760-609A.1.b, granting of the variance would result in the uses of groundwater as a drinking water supply being impaired, taking into account the direction of groundwater flow. The proposed well is not acceptable as a noncommunity public water supply because of the proximity to a sewage disposal system and the shallow depth. Traces of ammonia were found in the test well. In accordance with §760-609A.1.e, granting of the variance would adversely affect the design of an adequate on -site water supply, taking into account depth to groundwater, direction of groundwater flow and shallow well conditions. After reconsideration on May 19, 2005, it was a 3 to 0 determination of the Board to grant the request for the variance to construct the well and sewage disposal system in the proposed locations, provided the applicant covenants, in language acceptable to the County Attorney, that the first floor of the building may be used for dry retail purposes only with no food service, and the second story and cellar may be used as storage space only. The proposed use with construction of a new on -site sewage disposal system is more protective of surrounding wells than the current existing situation. The proposed use results in less design sewage flow than a single-family residence and the proposed septic tank, leaching pool disposal system and will result in an improvement of the quality of sewage discharged over the existing single cesspool that provides no pollutant removal. Additionally, the proposed use does not require the creation of a non -community, public water supply. As per §760-609 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (Sanitary Code), the approval of the variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Sanitary Code to protect groundwater and drinking water supplies, surface water and other natural resources, and public � health, safety and welfare. May 20, 2005 Stephen A. Costa, P.E. Chairman — Board of Review Schedule A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY DECLARANT: ROBERT EHRLICH H.D. REF. NO. C10-02-0016 ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Hamlet of Orient, in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument at the intersection of the westerly line of Village Lane with the southerly line of Main Road from said point of beginning; RUNNING THENCE along said westerly line of Village Lane, South 14 degrees 30 minutes East, 94.92 feet to a monument; THENCE along land now or formerly of Corcoran, two (2) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 70.00 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 14 minutes West, 57.00 feet to land now or formerly of Hale; THENCE along said land now or formerly of Hale, three (3) courses and distances: 1) North 63 degrees 20 minutes West, 51.62 feet; 2) South 26 degrees 49 minutes West, 28.02 feet; 3) North 80 degrees 18 minutes West, 20.93 feet to an iron pipe; THENCE along land of Blanche Clingen, Elinor Bristow and Katharine Leslie, North 21 degrees 45 minutes East,130.54 feet to an iron pipe on said southerly line of the Main Road; THENCE along the southerly line of Main Road, two (2) courses and distances: 1) South 82 degrees 02 minutes East, 25.57 feet to a monument; 2) THENCE South 83 degrees 15 minutes East, 70.31 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. 6 Town of Southold 6 Planning Department Staff Report Site Plans Date: September 16, 2005 To: Planning Board From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer I. Application Information Project Title: Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan Prepared By: John Ehlers, Land Surveyor Date of Submission: August 25, 2005 Applicant: Robert Ehrlich Tax Map Number: 1000-18-5-5 Project Location: 2254 NYS Road 25 Zoning District: B Site Plan Fee: $ 629.90 Date of SP: Revised 08/15/05 Agent: Pat Moore Hamlet: Orient II. Description of Project This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc. space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 III. Site Analysis USE: The retail use is permitted. FRONT REAR SIDE LOT COV. LANDSCAPE % Zoning Required: 35' 25' Both 50' 30% 35% Zoning Proposed: +/-18' +/-17' +/- 32' 11% 57% SEQR Type of Action: To be discussed and possibly a Type II Present Land Use: Residential Existing Structures: single family residence Number of Lots Proposed: I Lot Type of Access Provided: NYS Road 25 requires a NYS DOT Curb cut SITE PLAN ISSUES: 1) Landscape Requirements: Under Town Code section § 100-213 Transition buffer area. "The purpose of the transition buffer area is to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. A buffer area shall be required along all boundaries of a nonresidential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. Such buffer area shall comply with at least the following minimum standards:" A. The buffer area shall be located within the boundaries of the subject property. B. The minimum width of buffer areas shall be as follows: "(4) General Business District: twenty-five (25) feet." The site plan does not comply. 2) Circulation and Access: Under Town Code section § 100-252 Objectives " In considering and acting upon site development plans, the Planning Board shall take into consideration the public health, safety and welfare, the economic impact and the comfort and Page Two, Erhlich, SeptembefP6, 2005 • Convenience of the public in general and the residents of the immediate neighborhood in particular and may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of its action may, to the maximum extent possible, further the expressed intent of this chapter and the accomplishment of the following objectives in particular:" A. Traffic access: that all proposed traffic access ways are adequate but not excessive in number; adequate in width, grade, alignment and visibility; are located in proper relationship to intersections, pedestrian crossings and other places of public assembly; and, further, are in conformance with overall traffic safety considerations. Other public agencies may require further improvements above and beyond the town's requirements. Roadway improvements not directly in front of the site may be necessary and required, based on overall traffic circulation and signalization of adjacent access points and streets. B. Interior circulation and parking: that adequate off-street parking and loading spaces are provided to satisfy the parking needs of the proposed uses on site and that the interior circulation system is so designed to provide convenient access to such spaces consistent with pedestrian safety, and, further, that loading areas shall not impede the flow of interior pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Handicap accessibility shall be provided and placed at the nearest point to the proposed structure. IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other Agencies This proposal requires review and/or approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYSDOT curb cut permit, ARC, LWRP, SC Planning, review by the Town Engineering Inspector, the Building Inspector's final certification and review by the Orient Fire District for fire access. V: Summary of Actions Required: • The Planning Board reviews the buffer as proposed and evaluate if it will be satisfactory. • Require a written submittal on the interior circulation of commercial traffic along with traffic access. • Planning Board need to vote on accepting, rejecting and or require revisions. • The applicant needs to submit the NYS DOT and SCDHS approval. • The applicant needs to submit the LWRP information. • The site plans can be referred out to the agencies. TIME LINE STATUS: 01/10/05 Building Dept. issued a notice of disapproval that a site plan is required. 02/09/05 The Application was submitted with a check of $330.00 and date stamped received by the PB. 02/09/05 The Application was date stamped received by the PB. 02/22/05 Verbal request from staff to the agent for revisions to site plan and additional information. 03/11/05 NYSDOT acknowledged receipt of the curb cut application from the agent. 03/25/05 Staff report to the PB and recommendation that the site plan needs a revision to place on hold. 03/28/05 Planning Board reviewed site plan and staff report and agreed to not accept and request revisions to the site plan. Approved staff to send a letter with requirements. 04/01/05 NYSDOT notified applicant of additional requirements. ! 0 Page Two, Erhlich, September 16, 2005 04/07/05 Staff sent a letter with a checklist to the agent that site plan is on hold and needs revisions. 04/12/05 PB office received a preliminary revised site plan for review 04/18/05 BD and PD staff met and agreed additional information is required for the review and a variance may be required for the ADA access. 04/25/05 Staff sent a letter with a checklist to the agent that site plan is on hold and needs revisions. 05/10/05 Agent submitted revised site plan and assorted material for review. 05/26/05 NYSDOT notified applicant of additional requirements and bond requirements. 06/14/05 Staff memo to PB indicating this will be on for June 20, 2005 work session. 06/16/05 NYS DOT letter oustanding issues. 06/17/05 NYS DOT letter with correspondence to Freddie Waschberger letter. 06/23/05 Letter to Pat Moore per work session on 100-213 buffer requirements. 06/28/05 Letter from Pat Moore about the buffer exemption. 07/05/05 Letter from Pat Moore and proper site plan fee of $629.90. 07/28/05 Letter for Denise Heyse on requirements. 08/04/05 Letter from Engineer on specific site items for ARC and pictures. 08/19/05 Letter and hand written response to Denise Heyse letter. 08/24/05 Letter from Pat Moore on hours of operation indicating 8am-7pm and revised site plans. C PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant August 24, 2005 Denise Heyse, Planner Trainee Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall P. O. Box1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Robert Ehrilich Retail Store SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Dear Ms. Heyse, Margaret Rutkowski Legal Secretary 'Ti 7)�N' �3 i AUG 25 2005 1 g; R u n As requested in your letter of July 28, 2005, enclosed is a letter from Michael Mapes, P.E. with amended site and floor plans. Mr. Mapes has placed notes next to the requested item in the Planning Boards letter of July28, 2005. (Copy enclosed) The hours of operation are 8 AM to 7 PM. Please indicate the type of C & R you had requested on page two, item number three of your letter. If you have any questions, or require additional data, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Ratricia C. Moore Encl. Michael Mapes, P.E Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone:631-369-2170 August19,2005 Patricia Moore, Atty. 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11973 M: Robert Ehrlich SCTM# 1000-018-05-05 Dear Ms. Moore: Please find the amended Site Plans and Floor Plans as per the Planning Boards recommendations. I have included the last letter to be used as a checklist with notations in red. If there are any questions please feel free to contact me at 631-369-2170. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E. 0 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS .IEa1l,YN 13. WOODHOUSE Chi WILIIAM J CREIALHS KJ.NNi'1`11 L. 1-:17WARDS MARTIN Ji SIDOR OJsOR(1 1l SOLOMON July 28, 2005 Patricia Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Patricia Moore: pI,A1VNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.0, Sox 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town. Halt Annex 54375 State Route 25 wor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fu - 631 765.3136 RE: Robert Ehrlich Retail Store SCTM#(s) 1000-18,-5-5 The Planning Board reviewed your application at the July 25, 2005 work session, and requests a revised site plan which demonstrates the following: /. Dumpster or trash bin location and size. 1 f 0,MD o sJ S-i7X- P64KJ ✓2. Maximum screening depth along each property line that has a residential use on the other side of said property line. Nb fW ow s'/Ir 1°1-4,0 �— >3. Outdoor lighting location and type- including cut sheets and wattage. Include S'Pers- o.J every feature in fighting design that permits you to meet code, while preventing 5 17-C Ptltrl any glare from encroaching on neighboring residential property. This includes the Lo,c SheZ T possibility of an outdoor lighting design with motion detectors. ikT7hek, 4. Account for large delivery trucks such as typically used by United Parcel Service (23'3" in length) to the shop. Design for safe entry, turn around and exit from the ,e2et,vkfx_ 5 parking lot, or provide a safe alternative to a potentially unsafe traffic condition f:rrg_ ho✓e-S i.e. possibly regulate large delivery trucks to another off site location, or to hours OP before and after those of hours open to the public. Plant an adequate height privet or railing along the west boundary of the porch, 1 NP to prevent (in an architecturally attractive way) pedestrians and customers from atte vse7ha side of the porch for entry to the retail shop:.&Iearly post i 5hr,pi Ts1y e parking lot at the west side of the retail shop a sign which will preverf rd rr1J pedestrians from attempting to walk from the parking lot along the west side o Ste�' �L��'� Handicau pped parking -design -to -code. 0� �p An accurate code compliant handicapped entry design (ramp location, grade, �.Pa materials it is to be constructed out of, dimensions) R N5J $ Recalculate the parking according to additional residential landscape buffer cr^' requirements. 9. Identify and relocate as necessary, any required employee parking. 0PJ 5-1TLf �Q��Lorep 0JAM . _........... _ _.-................ z'd Eb91, 99L 169 00143o me-1 ajo0w dEz:ZO So ao 9nu Rug 02 05 02:45p Moe Law Office 63 j65 4643 p. 3 Provide or indicate the following: 1. Hours of retail operation. rz-Vp rj'- 2. Sign detail including she, location, materials and appearance.�N ULrr sy,,ely-� 3. C&R.ea If 4. Architectural floor plans thLttaaccurately depict all kitchen appliances and sinks located in the building. i� 5. Architectural elevations which depict any changes that will be made to the exterior of the vul� :y in ud g tkv r7W- vf0yZ (fWC-k railing + installed.) P� �S l� 6. A New York State Department of Transportation Final Plan.-7 LA.L- ._5A-c\SFjt'b `PoT N'eteD Zo -s; r,5✓/1'+T sirV- 070 COMPe W Pt!'miT Whtu,-� I.S �r) A-hSA&4 If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the Planning Department at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, 41 �-- Denise Heyse Town of Southold Planner Trainee E Michael Mapes, P.E August 4, 2005 Town Of Southold Planning Department Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon Re: Robert Ehrlich Dry Retail Store 22540 Main Road Orient, N.Y. Dear Mr. Semon, Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone:631-369-2170 The purpose of this letter is to document the materials used in the constriction of the existing building for the Architectural Review Committee. Please find the attached five (5) photos, showing the exterior of the existing building. No changes are proposed for the exterior of the building. The first floor will be used for a gift shop with the second and third floors used for storage as shown on the floor plan supplied with the application package. Since no changes are proposed for the exterior of the building, recent color photos will more accurately illustrate the building exterior than would scaled architectural black and white drawings. The exterior of the building is sided with no.1 perfection cedar shingles in the natural state with a 6 inch exposure. The roof has hunter green asphalt shingles. The windows are wood framed double hung style windows. The trim on the exterior of the house is pine painted with a finish coat of white exterior grade paint. The existing heating system is hot water boiler which is located in the basement and will be used to heat the building. There are no other mechanical equipments such as air-conditioning or ventilation equipment proposed. The fuel oil tank for heating is located in the basement. A handicap walkway and ramp are proposed and the details are shown on the site plan. The proposed signage is shown on an attached picture of the front exterior of the building with the proposed sign inserted to scale with respect to the building. The sign details and colors are also shown on an attached data sheet supplied by Peconic Sign. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E. Dimension: 5' x 5' Circle Appac 22 sq.tt. �RAW OfIwMyjw 74MB Mob Rumd.GwwWor4 YR M44 Ph-4M-4r&=7 Fw-G"477-=4 6 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON July 28, 2005 Patricia Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Patricia Moore: MAILING ADDRESS: �F SOUjO� Iy P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 hO� OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 OlIT (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) ff"i Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1936 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD RE: Robert Ehrlich Retail Store SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 The Planning Board reviewed your application at the July 25, 2005 work session, and requests a revised site plan which demonstrates the following: 1. Dumpster or trash bin location and size. 2. Maximum screening depth along each property line that has a residential use on the other side of said property line. 3. Outdoor lighting location and type- including cut sheets and wattage. Include every feature in lighting design that permits you to meet code, while preventing any glare from encroaching on neighboring residential property. This includes the possibility of an outdoor lighting design with motion detectors. 4. Account for large delivery trucks such as typically used by United Parcel Service (23'3" in length) to the shop. Design for safe entry, turn around and exit from the parking lot, or provide a safe alternative to a potentially unsafe traffic condition i.e. possibly regulate large delivery trucks to another off site location, or to hours before and after those of hours open to the public. 5. Plant an adequate height privet or railing along the west boundary of the porch, to prevent (in an architecturally attractive way), pedestrians and customers from attempting to use that side of the porch for entry to the retail shop. Clearly post in the parking lot at the west side of the retail shop a sign which will prevent pedestrians from attempting to walk from the parking lot along the west side of the house. 6. Handicapped parking design to code. 7. An accurate code compliant handicapped entry design (ramp location, grade, materials it is to be constructed out of, dimensions) 8. Recalculate the parking according to additional residential landscape buffer requirements. 9. Identify and relocate as necessary, any required employee parking. Provide or indicate the following: 1. Hours of retail operation. 2. Sign detail including size, location, materials and appearance. 3. C&R. 4. Architectural floor plans that accurately depict all kitchen appliances and sinks located in the building. 5. Architectural elevations which depict any changes that will be made to the exterior of the building including the west elevation (privet or railing to be installed.) 6. A New York State Department of Transportation Final Plan. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact the Planning Department at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sincerely, Denise Heyse Town of Southold Planner Trainee 2 0 J. �efr� 3 f\chn TUB13 - �031 C� PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y.11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax:(631) 765-4643 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Art: Bruno (BY HAND) i ,F�. ES Sr July 5, 2005 Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 Dear Bruno: Margaret Rutkowski Secretary JUL ' 6 2005 I As a follow-up to my last letter, enclosed please find four prints of the revised site plan last dated 7-1-05 with the DOT revisions (they require removal or relocation of the 2.5 foot private hedge along the front). The client will relocate the hedge if the board approves. Also enclosed are the DOT letters issuing a permit, subject to relocation of hedges. Also changed are the following: the Parking for 572 sq. ft. of retail space requires 3 parking spaces, with 1 employee space, and 1 parking space for the storage: total of 5 spaces. The location of the spaces have been re -aligned to increase the landscape buffer from the south property line. I had shown this plan to the Board at the work session, they asked for confirmation theat there was adequate space for the cars to turn around. In response to this practical concern, an area is reserved for "tum around" to make it easier for the vehicles to back out of the spaces. Also, with regard to the landscape buffer area the owner will provide both a 6 foot fence along the property line as well as 6' tall arborvitae . In accordance with our telephone conversation, the site plan application fee has been re- calculated as follows: 0.28 acres $500 + existing building .10 x 1929 My client's check in the amount of $692.90 to replace my check The site plan is complete, it should be accepted for review and referral to the other agencies. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Very trul yours, cia C. Moore cc: Mr. Ehrlich vG � c0 J PoX�CUPolY%N8p56.T1EBOlIDF1f OFTILR DJCIIIEHf EOMf4X5 ORIENT COFFEE CO. M, N,'tiny +.A,0 50-7911214 0 1083 DOunxs 8 NORTH FORK .BANK 230 MAIN STREET GREENPORi, NY 1196d M 112001083il• 1:0214079i21:032241110ii59 7110 MfINO DSIGIWRE n • 0 0 Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant June 28, 2005 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-4616 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson -Planning Board Town of Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Ehrlich, 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business) Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: Margaret Rutkowski Betsy Perkins Legal Secretary Thank you for your letter of June 23, 2005, in reference to revising the site plan on the above project. In reference to Town Code section 100-213 buffer requirements for the B zoning District, section D, states, "A landscaped earthen berm, wall or fence of a location, height, design and materials approved by the Planning Board may be accepted for any portion of the required planting and/or buffer area as the required planting. We would respectfully request that the required buffer between the subject business property and the residential properties to the east owned by Claudia and Jeffery King and the residential property to the south owned by Allyson Constant be buffered by a six foot wooden fence for the following reasons: The King property contains a 6'-8' Hedge which already buffers the property. Our fence would provided an added buffer. The Constant property installed a 6' fence while the prior owner, Jonathan Mudd, ran his contractor's yard from this location. In addition Mr. Constant has a storage building and a shed along the south side of our property which blocks any views of the parking area. Insistence on 25' of landscape buffer would eliminate three parking spaces along the south east side of the parking area, push the parking against the building, and cause cars to park on Route 25. The alternative screening in accordance with paragraph D gives greater room for parking and easy maneuvering within the parking area. We have offered two parking designs for your consideration. The drawings dated May 4, 2005, the full site plan submission, locates 4 spaces along the east side and the fifth space along the south side. The 5' space could be the designated employee/shop owner's space, therefore, that space would result in no traffic to the site by the operator while there are patrons in the store during the hours of operation. A four foot high fence was proposed on the plan because of the location of the structures on the Constant property, however, this fence could be 6' high. The second plan offered at the work session offered 6 spaces facing each other (2 spaces on the west side and four spaces on the east side). I have advised Mr. Mapes. PE of your request for dimensions. He advised that all his designs meet the code dimensional requirements. Your work session notes of June 14, 2005 indicated that the site plan fee was calculated incorrectly. Enclosed is a copy of our letter to you of February 8, 2005, indicating how the fee was developed. If our calculations are incorrect please indicate the correct fee and calculations. Your letter of June 23, 2005, requests dimensions of the clear parking lot openings, aisle, and access way. the dimensions of these areas are as follows: 1. Parking lot spaces are 9' by 19' 2. The entrance to the parking lot from the Main Road is 25.57 feet (subject to DOT revisions) 3. Back up space is a minimum of 22' All of the above dimensions are shown to scale on the site plan. I hope this addresses the comments in your June 23, 2005 letter. This proposed use is in character with the Orient Hamlet, the property is similarly sized to the adjacent business parcels, provides ample off street parking and preserves the architectural character of the building. The owner proposes a small gift shop. The Hamlet of Orient contains a mixing of residential and small scale commercial uses. This parcel is one of four Business Zoned parcels, the proximity of the four businesses encourage walking from one location to the other and a symbiotic relationship between the businesses. This property provides "site planned" off street parking. There are numerous commercial uses in Business zoning which would result in greater density and impact to the community. The proposed gift shop is only 600 square feet, is next to another retailer and The Candy Man. Like most of the businesses in Orient, this business will rely mainly on tourism. We respectfully request that you accept the site plan and start the coordinited review. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office, Very truly yours, 'Fa44;i� c . �r Patricia C. Moore CC: Robert Ehrlich Michael Mapes Encl. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR May 26, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Mapes: JOSEPH H. BDANDMI4N �___------- - COMMISSIONER I I JUL I Your Mav 5, 2005 Submission Richard Ehrlich — Retail Store Survey Plan Dated 5/4/05 Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Our Case No. 05-074P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following item must be addressed: 1. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be shown with a detectable warning field. The sidewalk pedestrian ramp at the intersection with Village Lane shall be constructed with this feature. Please include the appropriate details on the plan. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Kindly submit three (3) sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. Mr. Michaeil Mapes May 26, 2005 Page 2 All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"):$550.00 Bond Amount:$5,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. IS, AAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR June 17, 2005 Mr. Freddie Wachsberger, Vice President Southold Citizens For Safe Roads P.O Box 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Your May 26, 2005 Letter Route 25, Orient Dear Mr. Waschberger: L JUN 2 3 2005 Town m Thank you for your letter to Mr. Mark Wolfgang, of my staff, concerning the Ehrlich property located on the south side of Route 25 at the intersection with Village Lane. The property and associated curb cut access that you have brought to our attention is currently in the review process for proposed commercial access to Route 25. The Town of Southold is responsible for regulating land usage and approving building permits. We are forwarding a copy of your letter to the Town for appropriate action to address your concerns. Our role in developments, such as this one, along or adjacent to the State Highway system, is to review the proposed work within the State Highway right-of-way (ROW) and to review the impact of the site generated traffic on the State Highway system. The developer must mitigate negative traffic impacts, which could require construction of turning lanes, highway widening, traffic signal improvements and other related work depending on the size and scope of the development. Once developers address those impacts to our satisfaction, we issue highway work permit(s) to allow developers to work within the State Highway right-of-way to carry out the necessary work. We do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Hopefully, this clarifies our Department's role in developments, such as this one. In this case the parcel in question currently has residential access to Route 25. The applicant is proposing commercial access to this parcel at the same location as the residential access. Access widening will be required to accommodate commercial traffic. As part of our review we have considered the placement of the access on the local street; however, the local street in this case is a non standard intersection that promotes a higher speed turning movement. This would decrease the level of safety for vehicles entering at this location. Mr. Freddie Wachsberger June 17, 2005 Page 2 The access point on Route 25 provides sufficient sight distance for entering and exiting vehicles for the speed of the highway. As we stated above we do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Route 25, at this location, is not a controlled or limited access highway; therefore, once the applicant can provide a design that reasonably meets our standards, submits an application with associated fees and insurance we must issue a Highway Work Permit. We will discuss your request to establish "No Parking" through this section of Route 25 with the Town of Southold. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Thank you for your interest in this matter. Ver truly yours, rigid'01';; i;;u By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold ✓Mr. Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold w/copy of letter attached SAS:MW:DW STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 1 1788-5518 SUSIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR June 16, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 Follow un to our Mav 26. 2005 letter Your Mav 5, 2005 Submission Richard Ehrlich — Retail Store Survey Plan Dated 5/4/05 Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Our Case No. 05-074P Dear Mr. Mapes: Sv/�3 f: Vj I&I Thank you for your telephone call to Mr. Mark Wolfgang, of my staff concerning the hedges along the Route 25 property frontage at this location. As we informed you in our April 1, 2005 letter, comment 94, all hedges that are located within the State highway right-of-way shall be re -located so they are entirely within the applicant's property. Re -submitted site plans shall show this re -location prior to Highway Work Permit issuance. Additionally, we will also require the applicant install No Parking signs to establish a No Parking restriction. The restriction, on the south side of Route 25, shall extend from the intersection of Route 25 and Village Lane, west, for a minimum distance of one hundred (100) feet. Re- submitted plans shall show all details as per MUTCD and NYSDOT specifications. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW 1-1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON June 23, 2005 • PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11952 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business District) Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the revised site plan materials submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on June 20, 2005 and determined that this site plan is incomplete as submitted. The site plan application must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. Please revise the preliminary site plan with dimensions of the clear parking lot openings, aisle, spaces, and access way. Submit this preliminary revised site plan to the Planning Department. In addition provide compliance with the landscape requirements of Town Code section 100-213 buffer requirements for the B zoning District If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ecttull ours, Bruno S on Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plans Date: June 14, 2005 I. Application Information Project Title: Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan Prepared By: John Ehlers, Land Surveyor Date of SP: Revised 05/04/05 Date of Submission: May 10, 2005 Applicant: Robert Ehrlich Agent: Pat Moore Tax Map Number: 1000-18-5-5 Project Location: 2254 NYS Road 25 Hamlet: Orient Zoning District: B TIME LINE STATUS: 01/10/05 Building Dept. issued a notice of disapproval that a site plan is required. 02/09/05 The Application was submitted with a check of $330.00 and date stamped received by the PB. 02/09/05 The Application was date stamped received by the PB. 02/22/05 Verbal request from staff to the agent for revisions to site plan and additional information. 03/11/05 NYSDOT acknowledged receipt of the curb cut application from the agent. 03/25/05 Staff report to the PB and recommendation that the site plan needs a revision to place on hold. 03/28/05 Planning Board reviewed site plan and staff report and agreed to not accept and request revisions to the site plan. Approved staff to send a letter with requirements. 04/01/05 NYSDOT notified applicant of additional requirements. 04/07/05 Staff sent a letter with a checklist to the agent that site plan is on hold and needs revisions. 04/12/05 PB office received a preliminary revised site plan for review 04/18/05 BD and PD staff met and agreed additional information is required for the review and a variance may be required for the ADA access. 04/25/05 Staff sent a letter with a checklist to the agent that site plan is on hold and needs revisions. 05/10/05 Agent submitted revised site plan and assorted material for review. 05/26/05 NYSDOT notified applicant of additional requirements and bond requirements. 06/14/05 Staff memo to PB indicating this will be on for June 20, 2005 work session. II. Description of Proiect This site plan is for alteration of an existing 1929 sq.ft. two (2) story single family dwelling into a 572 sq. ft. retail store, 941 sq. ft. of storage and 416 sq.ft. of misc. space on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 III. Site Analysis USE: The retail use is permitted and needs to be clarified FRONT REAR SIDE LOT COV. LANDSCAPE % Zoning Required: 35' 25' Both 50' 30% 35% Zoning Proposed: +/- 18' +/- 17' +/- 32' 11% 50% SEQR Type of Action: Type II Present Land Use: Residential Existing Structures: single family residence Number of Lots Proposed: 1 Lot Type of Access Provided: NYS Road 25 requires a NYS DOT Curb cut SITE PLAN ISSUES: Landscape Requirements: Under Town Code section § 100-213 Transition buffer area. "The purpose of the transition buffer area is to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. A buffer area shall be required along all boundaries of a nonresidential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. Such buffer area shall comply with at least the following minimum standards:" A. The buffer area shall be located within the boundaries of the subject property. B. The minimum width of buffer areas shall be as follows: "(4) General Business District: twenty-five (25) feet." The site plan does not comply. IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other A¢encies I was verbally informed by Mr. Mapes that SCDHS is approving and NYSDOT approval is complete and will be submitted. This proposal requires review and/or approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services, NYSDOT curb cut permit, review by the Town Engineering Inspector, the Building Inspector's final certification and review by the Orient Fire District for fire access. V: Summary of Actions Required: • We need the proper fee submitted and a plan meeting the landscape code. • The applicant should submit the NYS DOT and SCDHS approval. • The plans can be referred out to the agencies. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: June 14, 2005 To: William J. Cremers, Vice -Chairman From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer* Re: Site Plan for Robert Erlich Main Road and Village Lane Orient, NY SCTM#1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 As per our conversation and in reference to the above, I want to inform you that we are receiving pressure from the agent, Patricia Moore, Esq., to proceed with this application. The following will up -date you on the status of this application: On April 7 and 25, 2005, the agent was notified by letter that the application is incomplete and will be on hold. (See the attached letters.) On May 10, 2005, the Planning Department received a letter from the agent and a revised site plan and, after review, it appears complete. (See attached letter.) At this time, Ms. Moore has made a request that we process this application. I feel that, because of the public meeting on June 13, 2005, it would be my recommendation that we review this at the Work Session on June 20, 2005. Thank you in advance. cc: Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director Planning Board encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBA JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON April 7, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11952 r � i ` 1�1 i r PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business District) Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the site plan application submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on March 25, 2005 and determined that this site plan is incomplete as submitted. The site plan must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Review the attached checklist and refer to the Town Code. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ectfully y rs, B no Semo Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb PLANNING BOARD MEMBER JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 25, 2005 Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11952 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business District) Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the revised site plan material dated April 12, 2005 submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on April 18, 2005 and determine that this site plan is incomplete as submitted. The site plan must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Review the attached checklist and refer to the Town Code. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. In addition the revised materials was reviewed at the Joint Building Department / Planning Department meeting on April 18, 2005. Please revise the site plan to include all distance dimensions, building total square foot, breakout use for retail and indicate the use of the balance of the building. Clarify the square foot/floor location uses of the entire existing building in current and future plan use. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. Res ully urs, Br o e n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant May 9, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Art: Bruno Re: Site plan for Robert Ehrlich 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-05-05 Dear Bruno: Margaret Rutkowski Legal Secretary MAY J n zn05 As requested in your letter of April 25, 2005, enclosed is a revised site plan that incorporates all the additional data contained in the Site Plan Checklist. In addition, in lieu of elevation drawings, photographs are submitted for east, west, north & south. Floor plans are attached for review by the Architectural Review Committee. The building will remain as is. A sign to be installed between the windows on the second floor wall facing the street will be forwarded as soon as completed. Submissions have been made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Transportation. If you have any questions, or require additional data, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore Encl,s cc: Robert Ehrlich Michael Mapes, P.E. STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR May 26, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Mapes: Your May 5, 2005 Submission Richard Ehrlich — Retail Store Survey Plan Dated 5/4/05 Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Our Case No. 05-074P JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER J U N - 3 2005 This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following item must be addressed: 1. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be shown with a detectable warning field. The sidewalk pedestrian ramp at the intersection with Village Lane shall be constructed with this feature. Please include the appropriate details on the plan. Site plan approval for highway work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Kindly submit three (3) sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. .. • 0 Mr. Michaeil Mapes May 26, 2005 Page 2 All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"):$550.00 Bond Amount:$5,000.00 Insurance Fee: $175 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Is. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW • • Pa STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONC- 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN SUSIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. COMMISSIONER REGIONAL DIRECTOR May 16, 2005 Mr. Clyde Waschberger Box 307 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Waschberger: Your April 24 2005 Letter Route 25, Orient Thank you for your letter to Mr. Mark Wolfgang, of my staff, concerning the Ehrlich property located on the south side of Route 25 at the intersection with Village Lane. The property and associated curb cut access that you have brought to our attention is currently in the review process for proposed commercial access to Route 25. The Town of Southold is responsible for regulating land usage and approving building permits. We are forwarding a copy of your letter to the Town for appropriate action to address your concerns. Our role in developments, such as this one, along or adjacent to the State Highway system, is to review the proposed work within the State Highway right-of-way (ROW) and to review the impact of the site generated traffic on the State Highway system. The developer must mitigate negative traffic impacts, which could require construction of turning lanes, highway widening, traffic signal improvements and other related work depending on the size and scope of the development. Once developers address those impacts to our satisfaction, we issue highway work permit(s) to allow developers to work within the State Highway right-of-way to carry out the necessary work. We do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Hopefully, this clarifies our Department's role in developments, such as this one. In this case the parcel in question currently has residential access to Route 25. The applicant is proposing commercial access to this parcel at the same location as the residential access. Access widening will be required to accommodate commercial traffic. As part of our review we have considered the placement of the access on the local street; however, the local street in this case is a non standard intersection that promotes a higher speed turning movement. This would decrease the level of safety for vehicles entering at this location. As you pointed out in your letter the speed limit through this section is 40 mph. The access point on Route 25 provides sufficient sight distance for entering and exiting vehicles for the speed of the highway. As we stated above we do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Route 25, at this location, is not a controlled or limited access highway; therefore, once the applicant can provide a design that reasonably meets our standards, submits an application with associated fees and insurance we must issue a Highway Work Permit. Mr. Clyde Waschberger May 16, 2005 Page 2 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Thank you for your interest in this matter Ve .trply,ypups, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: r. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold w/copy of letter attached SAS:MW:DW PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel:(631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Robert G. Kassner Legal Assistant May 9, 2005 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno Re: Site plan for Robert Ehrlich 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-05-05 Dear Bruno: Margaret Rutkowski Legal Secretary MAY i ^ 2005 As requested in your letter of April 25, 2005, enclosed is a revised site plan that incorporates all the additional data contained in the Site Plan Checklist. In addition, in lieu of elevation drawings, photographs are submitted for east, west, north & south. Floor plans are attached for review by the Architectural Review Committee. The building will remain as is. A sign to be installed between the windows on the second floor wall facing the street will be forwarded as soon as completed. Submissions have been made to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services and the New York State Department of Transportation. If you have any questions, or require additional data, please contact this office. Very truly yours, PmJ�� f 4 Patricia C. Moore Encl,s cc: Robert Ehrlich Michael Mapes, P.E. m m m 466 m I -1 - vo NOWAA a,- c Una PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS EENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON April 25, 2005 Of SO(/ly�yy T OOUNT11 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mrs. Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11952 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 766-3136 Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business District) Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the revised site plan material dated April 12, 2005 submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on April 18, 2005 and determine that this site plan is incomplete as submitted. The site plan must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Review the attached checklist and refer to the Town Code. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. In addition the revised materials was reviewed at the Joint Building Department / Planning Department meeting on April 18, 2005. Please revise the site plan to include all distance dimensions, building total square foot, breakout use for retail and indicate the use of the balance of the building. Clarify the square foot/floor location uses of the entire existing building in current and future plan use. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ully urs, Br o e n Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS { } Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. { } Lot, block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. {✓F Name and address of landowner on record. {( Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). { } Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. { } Date of Plan. {� North Point. {v}' Location of all rights -of -way within 500 feet of,property lines. {v}' Key map showing location and owners of alt adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet Existing zone district, inin roperty zone dis is and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. { } Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). { } Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). {+� Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. { } Existing building structures/ utilities and proposed structures /utilities. {v}� Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. {. } Drainage plan detailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. {✓}' Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. { } Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. { Show location of dumpster. Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. { Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, { buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS (If Applicable) { } Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. { } Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less { } Show wetlands { i}� Outdoor signs — sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-200/209 { } Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line { } Spot elevations for buildings i . 2 r NOTE: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS (If Applicable) { } Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit ( For Route 25) { } Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit ( For County Road 48) { } Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) () New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water runoff permit (SPDES) for ground disturbance of 1 acre or greater. { } Review by Southold Town Trustees for dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area { } Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals { } Review required by Southold Town Board () U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. () Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. { } Other 2 Michael Mapes, P.E April12,2004 Town Of Southold Planning Department Town Hall Southold, N.Y. 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon p —J Is Re: Robert Ehrlich Dry Retail Store 22540 Main Road Orient, N.Y. Dear Mr. Semon, 0 Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, N.Y. 11901 Phone:631-369-2170 Please find the 3 copies each of the preliminary site plan as per our phone conversation a couple weeks ago. I would like to discuss this project with you at your convenience. I will contact you to schedule a time to discuss this project. If there are any questions you can contact me at 344-2841. Sincerely, Michael Mapes, P.E. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON April 7, 2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11952 MAILING ADDRESS: Of SO(/�yOIO P.Southold,OoN1179 71 lxI OFFICE LOCATION: co r- Town Hall Annex �O 54375 State Route 25 � (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Comm,� Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed site plan for Ehrlich, Robert Located approximately 2254 Main Road, Orient SCTM#1000-18-5-5 Zone: B (General Business District) Dear Mrs. Moore, In reviewing the site plan application submitted to this office, the Planning Board (PB) held a Work Session on March 25, 2005 and determined that this site plan is incomplete as submitted. The site plan must be revised to include the minimum Town Code requirements. Review the attached checklist and refer to the Town Code. Pending your revisions, the site plan application will be on hold with this department. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Res ectfully y rs, B no Semo Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file,pb SITE PLAN CHECKLIST MINIMUM SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS { } Notice of Disapproval from Building Department required under 100-253 of the Town Code. { } Lot, block section from Suffolk County Tax Map. { } Name and address of landowner on record. { } Names and addresses of adjoining landowners. { } Names and address of applicant (if not same as landowner). { } Name and address of person preparing map (plan) sealed with license seal and signature. { } Date of Plan. { } North Point. { } Location of all rights -of -way within 500 feet of property lines. {/} Key map showing location and owners of all adjoining lands within 500 feet at a scale of 1 inch equals 100 feet. { Existing zone district, adjoining property zone districts and zoning district lines if the property includes a split zone. Buildings and build out with percent lot coverage ( see bulk schedule of zone). {� Landscaping and percent landscaped ( see bulk schedule of zone). { Scale, 1 inch equals 20 feet. { } Existing building structures / utilities and proposed structures /utilities. {� Show all uses of the site in a town defined type, detail square feet and parking calculations broken down by the use, refer to Town Code section 100-190. Include handicap parking spaces as required in New York State Code. {� Drainage plan detailing paved areas including sidewalks and parking areas with calculations. {v}' Show outdoor lighting with detail of wattage and type of fixture refer to 100-239.5. Show location of ground transformers, fire well and fire hydrants. {� }� Show location of dumpster. {r}� Existing trees of 6 inches in diameter at a point 3 feet above the truck base property boundaries. {4' Landscape plan detailing location of landscaping, type of material plants, buffering, street trees -see attached Town Code information 100-212 & 100-213. {� Data for architectural review (see information below) & refer to 100-257 & 100-258 Building elevations for all facades and floor plans showing proposed use of floor area ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS (If Applicable) {,/;' Off street loading areas as required, refer to Town Code 100-192 for Loading Berth Requirements. { } Existing contours with intervals of 2 feet or less Show wetlands { }� Outdoor signs — sketch to scale and colors refer to 100-200/209 { } Proposed grading, including existing and proposed topography with 2 feet contours on site and 200 feet beyond the property line { } Spot elevations for buildings NOTE: YOU ARE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS: OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS (If Applicable) {' Review required by Suffolk County Department of Health Services ("1 Review by New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) for curb cut permit ( For Route 25) { } Review by Suffolk County Department of Public Works (SCDPW) for curb cut permit ( For County Road 48) { } Review by New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) () New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Storm water runoff permit (SPDES) for ground disturbance of 1 acre or greater. { } Review by Southold Town Trustees for dredging, bulkhead, wetlands, coastal hazard area { } Review required by Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals { } Review required by Southold Town Board () U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Bulkhead, dredging. () Greenport Village Utility: Water if within village franchise area. { } Other A STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. r-- JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER April 1, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 Your March 4, 2005 Submission Richard Ehrlich — Retail Store Survev Plan Dated 1/22/03. Last Revision 3/l/05 Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Our Case No. 05-074P Dear Mr. Mapes: This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site work and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent properties. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. 2. All work and material details for driveway, sidewalk and pavement repair shall be referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be shown with a detectable warning field. 3. The plans must show all traffic signs, including text, as well as pavement markings, utilities and other appurtenances along the site's State highway frontage. 4. All hedges that are planted within the State highway right-of-way shall be moved so that they are located entirely within the applicant's property. 5. The driveway radius shall be offset from the west property line a minimum of five (5) feet. Please consult our driveway policy manual on our website at: ham://www.dot.state.ny.us/traffic/oper/perinits/hwt)/dwpolind.pdf for further guidance in this matter. Mr. Michaeil Mapes April 1, 2005 Page 2 6. A driveway profile or on site elevations, including elevations at the State highway right- of-way line, shall be shown on the plans to insure that all drainage is contained on site since we do not permit runoff from property onto the State highways. 7. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. 8. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Route 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." 9. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 10. A note shall be added to the plans stating which consecutive Route 25 mile markers the site falls between or the mile markers shall be shown on the plan. 11. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP)applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit three (3) copies of the revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold vZs. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold r. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW Town of Southold Planning Department Staff Report Site Plans Date: March 25, 2005 I. Application Information Project Title: Ehrlich, Robert Site Plan Prepared By: John Ehlers, Land Surveyor Date of Map: 01 /22/03 and last revised 04/07/03 Date of Submission: February 09, 2005 Applicant: Robert Ehrlich Agent: Pat Moore Tax Map Number: 1000-18-5-5 Project Location: 2254 NYS Road 25 Hamlet: Orient Zoning District: B II. Description of Project This site plan is for alteration of an existing two (2) story single family dwelling into a 600 sq ft retail store on a .28 acre parcel in the B Zone located at the s/w comer of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane in Orient. SCTM#(s) 1000-18.-5-5 III. Site Analysis USE: The retail use is permitted and needs to be clarified. FRONT REAR SIDE LOT COV. LANDSCAPE % Zoning Required: Zoning Proposed: SEQR Type of Action: Type II Present Land Use: Residential Existing Structures: single family residence Number of Lots Proposed: 1 Lot Type of Access Provided: NYS Road 25 IV: Permits and/or Review Required From Other A¢encies Per a review with Mike Verity on 3/14/05, the site will not require a variance at this time. A request needs to be made for a simple set of plans and a description of the building use with ADA access shown. In addition, this proposal requires review and/or approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services or engineer's certification, NYSDOT curb cut permit, review by the Town Engineering Inspector, the Building Inspector's final certification and review by the Orient Fire District for fire access. V: Summary of Actions Required: At this time the Planning Board can't process this application until a revised site plan is submitted with the minimum Town Code requirements. A letter informing the agent we are in receipt of the application and can't process this application until a revised site plan is received. • The applicant should submit septic certification and or SCDHS approval. • We need the proper fee submitted, use detailed in building, square feet detailed, parking calculations, lot coverage detailed, landscape coverage detailed, landscape noted to meet code, drainage detailed with calculations, note adjoining zones (R-40), ADA parking/ access and a key map. SUSIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR March 11, 2005 Mr. Michael Mapes, P.E. 163 Peninsula Path Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Mapes: Pool ryr STATE OF NEW YORK BS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN COMMISSIONER Your March 4, 2005 Submission Richard Ehrlich — Retail Store Survev Plan Dated 1/22/03, Last Revision 3/l/05 Route 25, Orient SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Our Case No. 05-074P This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. We are in the process of reviewing your submission. When our review is complete we will notify you by letter and provide you with further direction in the Highway Work Permit application process. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: 11rPeter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Ws. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold Ms. Wendy Brodsky, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission 61MN►IJA�]�JI Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Bruno (BY HAND) Dear Bruno: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 0 February 8, 2005 Re: Site plan of Robert Ehrlich SCTM#1000-18-05-05 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Enclosed please find "as built" site plan. The owner wishes to use the existing building , first floor space, for a retail use. In order to advertise the property for rental of the retail use he wishes to have an approved site plan. Parking for 600 sq. ft. of retail space requires 3 parking spaces, with 1 employee: we have shown 7 existing parking spaces. One parking space will have to be designated as handicap space- we will take the Planning Board's recommendation on the location of the handicap space. We would appreciate your comments and recommendations. Since the applicant is seeking to re -use an existing building we would respectfully request waiver of site plan issues which could be addressed in letter form. Also enclosed is following: 1. site plan application and SEQRA long form 2. application fee calculated as follows: 0.28 acres $300 + existing building retail space @600 sq. ft./.05 $30.00 My check in the amount of $330.00 3. Notice of disapproval dated January 10, 2005 . If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Zry trn yo rs, icia C. Moore co: Mr. Ehrlich PCM/mr Encls. i 731� -MUNI 4 Y � Y -34 ti "! i,sr all 1! .0 � L� M .0 �� VFA ... '5- AS,,Z 4, v .,�- .V- , RI A; 0 FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: January 10, 2005 TO: Robert Erlich 17 Main Avenue Sea Cliff, NY 11579 Please take notice that your application dated December 29, 2005 For permit to open a retail shop in an existing dwelling at Location of property: 22540 Main Road, Orient County Tax Map No. 1000 -Section 18 Block 5 Lot 5 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed conversion requires site plan approval from the Southold Town Planning Board. (0`7 Authorized Signa ure Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Planning Board FOR INTERNAL USE ONAb J" SITE PLAN USE DETERMINATION Initial Determination Lag Date Gent: ► / �I / �, Project Name: EHg-L.,ck Project Add ress:c;05 40 ► �a, , 1Z,�. nQ, , t Suffolk County Tax Map No.:1000- ig - s - 5 Zoning District: S (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: Use i,, q)F- OIL ram � Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:. N, of Planning Department (P.D.) Referral: P.D. Date Received: / / / dS Date of Comment: Comments: Final Determination Date: / / Decision: tiC, Siqnature of Buildinq Inspector "iaa66 ' ROB RT J. EHRLI4r 210 17 IN AVE. CLIFF, NY 11579� Z 263 S" NY A". CI , NYve. A S" Sea i:0 2 i00 14861: 0661,138008 011' 0 i 39 Expiration , 20 - Buil ing Inspector T APPLICATION CHECKLIST ar need the following, before applying? d of Health s of Building Plans ning Board approval to:mv-1 ( Z)IACnc�� �Co%lti,, Ny Phone:'T(6 6 z 1-Og i8 S-? Cdk,t-.k�_t S/6 6s6 ysV3' Ce(( Sid- Szy 33�8 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PE IT DEC 2 9 Date �L Z� 2004I 7 INSTRUCTIONS a. This'apjilication MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 4 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale. Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. \ (Signature of applicant or name, if a corporation) (Mailing address of a plicant) t to whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder N1yame of owner of premises Z 1-S ya yN �d L I- G / \ (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. _ Electricians License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location gfLaand on N 1 )qD House Number Street will be done: o efl* Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section /0 Block Lot_ Subdivision Filed Map No. Lot (Name) 2` Mate existing use and occupan I Opremises �( a. Existing use and occupancy d use and occupoof proposed 0 v � \� b. Intended use and occupancy &a&�- /�. Nature of work (check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal_ Demolition Other Work Ali) t'nmstAir-'bo)J 1 (Description) ,4timated Cost AJo CakA+, c 0)4 &yy) Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. • If (Welling, number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If gbrage, number of cars _ 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height _Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front Rear Depth 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES NO X3. Nwill4iot be re -graded? YES_ NO jZWiII excess fill be removed from premises? YES_ NO Ll4- 4. Names`'of Owner of premises 1Z 5 4 D / o im q-y1 Address Phone No. Name bf Architect Address Phone No Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 5,a. Is.'this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO / * IF Y$S, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE yEQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet. of a tidal wetland? * YES NO I / * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 7- 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) i SS: COUNTY O1� being duly sworn, deposes and says that (s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the i501 Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the mariner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworl to before me thij ti day of L;NL _ 20 Vq NotaiVjPublic MELANIE DOROSKI NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York No. 01 D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County \ l Commission Expires September 30 Signature of Applicant ce:EWRLICH DO I$pAj� A A40TIOIv' TO CLOSE rhtec h consideration of the ap"cation Baring, rese all public rvrng decision Of the r eci°rd comments thatuVon of [hose proceedi have been nSs, and provided, a review complies tti a de of whether the a th the Toun's site requirements. Plan re PPlication IT IS the Piannin¢ oarJ's intent to arrite at neki scheduled public a decision mezting, and to ' • On this application at t rune a uri[ten det he that decision. em[inati cn in acc°rdaRCe L4•ith 3)1-51o(a 0 fI March 19, 2006 Ar To the Members of Southold Town Planning Board, After reading the account of the March 13, 2006 Planning Board Meeting, we would like to correct some of the comments made by Pat Moore. First, the Little House was opened four years ago, not two. The entrance to our parking lot is on Oysterponds Lane not RT 25. The size and location of the parking lot are identical to its previous operation as a gift shop that was established as a business in the 1960s by Orient resident Dick Keogh. In addition the size of the Little House's property is more than two (2) times the size of the property in question and has the required buffer distance between our building and our residential neighbors. We hope that this clears up some of the facts concerning the Little House. Sincerely yours, John & Linda Sabatino - owners of Little House Orient, NY 11957 i � AR 2,1 2006 March 13, 2006 Supervisor Scott Russell and the Tow Southold Town Hall y �' o^�Main Road � [� Southold, NY 11957 "; D it MAA '� 2006 Gentlemen, � This letter concerns the application o R ih for a store at the entrance to Village Lane i The request should be turned downiWeeveral reasons. I am mainly concerned about safety. I live on Village Lane. A store at this location will create a serious traffic hazard. Entering Rte. 25 from Village Lane is already a challenge. To add a store at the corner will acerbate the situation. Village Lane is the heart of Orient's Historic District. A store at the entrance negates the meaning of one of the historic jewels in the Town of Southold. It would be in the best interest, not only for those living on Village lane, but also the Town of Southold, to consider a zone change of the property to residential. I hope that you will consider such a change. Thank you for your consideration. I33 ely�. ould 0 Village Lane P.O. Box 445 Orient, NY 11957 rA F t_- CONSTANT PO Box 316, ORIENT, NY 11957-0316 March 13, 2006 Southold Town Planning Board My name is Edwin Richard Constant, I'm 63 years of ag� semi -refired As an owner of the property at 200 Village Lane, OriM, NY, my future retirement residence, my garage and property lines are directly behind the Ehrlich property. We in fact share property lines on three different sides. I want to set forth the reasons why I am opposed to the business(`s) on the comer of Village Lane and Route 25. First and foremost in my own mind is that of road safety. Even though I see on the site plan the provision for entrance and exit, in reality I expect that road safety would be compromised with multiple vehicles entering and exiting even with the normal weekday flow of Route 25 traffic, let alone the weekend summer volume. I have also seen the provision for a delivery vehicle, what about multiple delivery vehicles, what about the hours of delivery and the coordination of the deliveries impeding traffic. What provisions are there for the trash and refuse removal truck and the hours for that action to take place? With provisions being made for garbage removal it self, I'm sure there will be cartons and packaging material to be disposed of. This is another aspect of road safety. What happens when automobile, garbage truck conflict on entrance or exit on that busy corner? Will the timing of trash removal be at an hour that prevents me from sleeping or wakes me at an in -appropriate time? After all, there is a dumpster shown on the site plan. What provisions have been made for overflow parking? When the parking spaces are occupied does that mean that the overflow parking is on the remaining grass buffer? Is the overflow planned for Route 25, is it planned for Village Lane? Where does the overflow go? I also noticed when driving east or west on Route 25, how would you know that the parking space is occupied? Where would you find adequate overflow parking? This leads me to my second point which affects me personally. That is the so called buffer that is to protect the quality of life of a residence when immediately against a business. Why is it not 25 feet? Is this showing some sort of favoritism towards the business owner? I think that I should have the same rights as he. It's my understanding that the parking space is dictated by the square footage of the retail space. It is also my • understanding that in this case the buffer is being reduced to allow the business sufficient space. This modification to the code to suit the business owner certainly in my opinion is not treating me, the resident fairly. I also want to note that the proposed site plan does not allow for the maintenance of my garage with the fence and tree line going along this property line. If anything I think as a homeowner that the fence and tree line should be along the edge of his parking area not at the end of his buffer against my property. I still feel without the fence the grass area of the buffer will be a temptation as an additional parking space or two. The third and last point I want to make is that this multifaceted business would be the gateway to Orient. A mostly residential area where although there are two other business's they are of a different scale and a location Route 25. I should add that they are a lot less intrusive on my quality of life for this future retiree in Orient. By the way, is the sound system still installed? I was there at 200 Village Lane shortly after the installation when it was tested. Is the food preparation equipment still there? All of these questions that remain unanswered and the other points I mention is the reason why I'm opposed to the business on the comer of Route 25 and the gateway to Orient at Village Lane next to the Civil War monument, the business at the Ehrlich property. In closing, thank you for this opportunity to explain my opposition to this plan and for your service to the community. Si erej3i yours, 4��' ✓�✓D" Edwin Richard Constant Oysterponds Historieal Society Orient, NY 11957 March 13, 2006 To: Southold Town Planning Board From: Edward W. Webb, President Re: Hearing on Ehrlich Property, Village Lane The Oysterponds Historical Society Board of Directors, representing its six hundred members, continues to oppose, (as stated in previous communications and testimony before the Southold Town Board), the use of the aforesaid property for commercial purposes. The legal questions regarding buffer zone adjoining the residential areas, inadequate parking, pedestrian safety, and the incursion of a commercial establishment upon affi historic district all speak against the latest use proposal. We anticipate that the Planning Board will proceed with due wisdom in assuring the Protection of this hamlet as a treasured resource of the Town of Southold. nE'CE Yin 2006 6 E, ; RM t • My name is Kathy Smith. I live at 1725 Village Lane Orient and I am the Vice President of the Oysterponds Historical Society. On May 21', 1976 the Department of the Interior in Washington, which maintains the National Register of Historic Places notified the Oysterponds Historical Society that their years of hard work and dedication had at last resulted in the success of their application to have the Orient Historic District placed on the National Register of Historic Places. As you can imagine extensive research was needed for this application and as a result OHS published this book entitled "Historic Orient Village" giving capsulated histories of all the houses located in the new "Orient His oiic District". Among those houses is the property now owned by Mr. V and the subject of my statement tonight. The first structure indicated on this site in 1860 was occupied by two seafaring men and their families, Captain Will Hubbard and David Edwards. Orient, is an incredibly unique historic hamlet. A drive down Village Lane and its surrounding area is a step back in time. Its historic character is the reason people take a Sunday afternoon drive through the Village. Why so many of us are grateful that we own homes here and why, we feel so strongly about having a business (antique store, auction house, R shop etc. etc.) lead the way into the irreplaceable historic time capsule that is "Historic Orient Village." /�\\�����'�• ' / � �p�T�.YMA +v+t. Y a.v-tweOiYp.l.4 _! TK MAR 14 2006 E u February 26, 2006 Supervisor Scott Russell Members of the Town Board Town Hall Southold, New York Dear Supervisor and Councilmen, I am writing to urge the town board to return the Erlich property at the comer of Village Lane and the Main Road in Orient to its more proper Residential Zone. It is inconceivable that this property might be a retail establishment for the following reasons: * Safety -- This is already a fairly dangerous intersection because of the offset of Young's Rd and because it is so heavily traveled. The Main Road curves at this spot and visibility for people turning is a problem. It is also on the path for school children and for traffic to the beach. Cars parked along Main Rd would obscure the oncoming traffic even further. Certainly cars will park on the road because the parking facility is inadequate. I live on Platt Rd, and coming out of Platt to turn left has become very dangerous because of parking on the Main Rd. Future — Granting this application for an "antiquelcrafttgift shop" would leave open a future possibility of a liquor license or of possible expanded business. This could ultimately destroy the entire character of the Village of Orient. Please give careful consideration to the voices of the residents of Orient. Sincerely, Jane Smith 1750 Platt Rd. Orient 7D h�A i M ^ R i 2n96 0 • 13 March 2006 To the Planning Board, We are writing to express our opposition to the opening and operation of an art gallery and auction house business on the corner of Village Lane and Route 25 in the hamlet of Orient, New York by Mr. Ehrlich. Our home is on Young's Road, less than 300 feet from this proposed business. Orient is a very quiet hamlet with most businesses closed by 5:30PM. Mr. Ehrlich's business will have long operating hours during which he will use amplified sound, generate noise, garbage, traffic and sewage. Most properties in this neighborhood are residential and use well water. It is extremely unsafe to operate a public restroom in such a neighborhood. In addition, the proposed site for this business is a particularly dangerous intersection. Most local businesses seldom have more than a few cars or trucks at their busiest moments. Mr. Ehrlich's art gallery and auction house will have pick-up and delivery trucks as well as considerable auto traffic. The traffic congestion of cars entering and leaving directly onto a busy state road, already overburdened with heavy ferry traffic, the noise, trash, and the additional sewage this business will create are significant reasons for the Planning Board to deny a business permit to Mr. Ehrlich. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Marianne Weil & Diane Bratcher 267 Young's Road Orient, NY 11957 0 Charles Randall Dean 295 Village Lane ., Orient, New York 11957 Southold Town Planning Board Southold, New York 11971 MAR ? 2006 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich 22540 NYS Route 25, Orient, N.Y. 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-5-5, hearing, Southold Town Planning Board, March 13, 2006, 6:10 p.m. Dear Board Members: As important as the issue of traffic safety is in the debate over the fate of Mr. Ehrlich's entrepreneurial venture at the entrance to Orient's Village Lane, I would like to address another issue —that of fair play. When Mr. Ehrlich purchased what had always been a residential house with the intention of transforming it into a business establishment, the requirement of a twenty-five foot buffer zone between a parking lot and an adjoining residential property was on the books. Certainly his attorney should have researched the requirements of opening a commercial establishment there, so Mr. Ehrlich should have known that if he were required to follow the rules there would be parking spaces for only a few cars. Those living near Mr. Ehrlich rely on the buffer zone requirement to protect their property values and the residential nature of the area from the destruction that a busy business would wreak. The express purpose of the twenty-five foot buffer zone rule is to preserve the privacy and the enjoyment of using one's residential property without exhaust fumes and bright car headlights and ugly asphalt and gravel at the property line. So what about the rights of Mr. Ehrlich's neighbors? And especially what about the rights of the Constant family and the King family, whose properties abut Mr. Ehrlich's proposed parking lot? The King family have owned their small property, 57' by 70', long before Mr. Ehrlich's property was rezoned commercial in 1988. The six-foot fence which Mr. Ehrlich proposes to run down the property line which they share will stand approximately twenty feet from the back of their home, creating a claustrophobic effect. The lovely residential nature of that part of Orient will be ruined forever. The buffer zone rule was designed to protect the citizens of this community from just this sort of abuse. I well understand that there are times when an established rule can have unintended and unfortunate consequences, necessitating a variance in the interest of the greater public good. But the community of Orient overwhelming opposes this application, and there is no compelling public interest in approving a variance. So it is entirely appropriate for the town government, as our representatives, to declare, "The rules by which our community is governed will be enforced." The citizens of Orient expect and deserve no less. 0 • As the referee in this dispute, please insist on fair play; please insist that Mr. Ehrlich adhere to our community's rule of the twenty-five foot buffer zone. If that leaves insufficient parking for a business, then I say that is all for the good. Situated on the property is a lovely home in one of the most unspoiled hamlets of Long Island. It has long served as a residence for one or two families and could continue to do so. By insisting that Mr. Ehrlich follow our community's rules, the members of the Southold Town Planning Board can be proud that together you will have helped to preserve one of the few remaining quiet and peaceful places on Long Island. Sincerely, Okjr',NL� Zj.� 40A,�,_ Charles Randall Dean 0 Douglas Constant 555 Village Lane PO Box 225 Orient, NY 11957 March 13, 2006 - - --� To: Southold Planning Board 1 ' From: Douglas Constant -R.- %, ^:r)rr Re: Hearing on Ehrlich Property - In 2004 the Planning Board, then chaired by Mr.. ��at 2254 Main Road in Orient. At that time the board told Mr. Ehrlich that the site did not have enough area for parking and was at a dangerous intersection. In spite of that meeting the west side of the property was stripped of trees and plantings and the garage was demolished. The total area of this property is .28 of an acre. When the 25 foot required transition buffer area is created along the King and Constant lot lines there is, as the 2004 Planning Board opined, not enough area for parking. In a previous life I was elected and served as a negotiator for the Southold Faculty Association. I participated in negotiating four multi -year contracts between our faculty association and various school boards. Often both sides of the table would wrestle with language - the type which would allow for interpretation and that which was undeniably narrow. In Section 100-213 we read language which leaves no room for interpretation. In the sentence "Such buffer shall comply with at least the following minimum standards".... the word "shall" means must. The words "at least" mean at a minimum and "minimum" means not less than. For the General Business Zone the minimum transition buffer area is 25 feet. The site plan shows buffers of 13.4 feet and 14.5 feet. I demand that the Town of Southold maintain the standards as codified and provide us with as much protection as is allowed. In addition, I see in the site plan 572 square feet of sales area and another 941 square feet of storage area. I have been an antiques dealer since 1978.1 rented two store fronts on Main Street in Greenport. The rear areas of both stores had storage areas. We regularly sold antiques to retail customers from that portion of our shop. Everything was for sale — always. In section 100-191 we see the parking requirements for "Antique Shop, Auction Gallery, 1 per 250 square feet of sales area arts and crafts shop and workshop." The most problematic of those cited uses is Auction Gallery. If the property is used for consignments and seats, where do the patrons park? In a General Business Zone the Planning Board cannot waive any portion of these requirements. Since 1 parking space for 250 square feet of sales area is the most liberal requirement for any business listed in Section 100-191 it seems to me the sales area/storage area designation is just a ruse to finally acquire a Certificate of Occupancy for a business at this location. Clearly this property is unsuitable for retail sales. Deny the application — do not let the genie out of the bottle. Thank you, Douglas Constant E Clyde Wachsberger Box 307 295 Village Lane Orient, New York,11957 Southold Town Planning Board Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich ..- 2254o NYS Route 25, Orient, N.Y.11957 SCTM : i000-18-5-5, hearing, Southold Town Planning Board, March 13, 20o6, Dear Board Members, There are fewer and fewer special places on this earth. Once one of these places is lost, it is lost forever. Village Lane in Orient is one of these unique places. It is a gorgeous picture -postcard unspoiled street running through the historic hamlet of Orient, lined with lovely homes, many of them centuries old. It's a quiet street with a slow pace. Neighbors are friendly but also entirely respectful of each others' privacy. Most importantly, the residents of Village Lane are respectful of the integrity of the Lane itself. We respect its long history. We are respectful of its quiet nature. We love our street. The entrance to this historic street is the intersection of Village Lane and the Main Road. There's the Monument, a memorial to local soldiers lost in the Civil War. The family names on the Monument are still familiar. Directly opposite is one of the oldest trees on the North Fork, the Buttonwood Tree, at the entrance to Youngs Road. A plaque on the tree states it was growing there when the Declaration of Independence was signed. The homes on the four corners of this intersection are all quiet residences. If one of these homes on this intersection becomes a business, the unique nature and character of Orient will change forever. It will never again be the same. Something wonderful, something unique, something special, will be lost forever. Don't let that happen on your watch! Let future generations be grateful and lucky that you, in 2006, made something wonderful happen. That you helped preserve a unique historic spot for all posterity to enjoy. LPI illage ��a�� continue unspoiled for another century! Thank you. .,, �' •. ^ y Sincerely, I 1 r Clyde MAR t 7006 Planni� " • March 13, 2006 Statement to the Planning Board Concerning Commercial Use of the Ehrlich Property, Main Road and Village Lane Every time I come over the causeway into Orient —whether I've been on an errand in Greenport or far away for a long time-4 am elated by the beauty, serenity, and specialness of this place. I cannot believe how lucky I am to live in the beautiful, historic village of Orient, surrounded by faun fields, within walking distance of both the Sound and Bay. I am grateful to to be able to walk down Village Lane at night, under a huge sky of stars, and hear only the sound of wind in the amazingly old and very large trees.... I am grateful to live among neighbors who have chosen to live in Orient because it is tranquil and connected to history. But Orient is a very small place. The Village is only a few streets. It can easily be threatened, and lost. Therefore, I strongly oppose the establishment of a commercial enterprise at the corner of Village Lane and the Main Road. Will there be bright lights at night? Will there be any music on the site, live or recorded? During auctions will there be a loudpseaker or a microphone to call out lot numbers and bids... How will the increase in traffic be handled?During auctions, where will people park and will there be someone supervising the parking? And how many patrons do you project for the auctions? Will any food or drink be served at any time on property, how will it be served, and how will the trash problem be solved? I sincerely hope that the Town will see fit to assert its right to say "no" to Mr. Ehrlich's proposal —use the 25 foot buffer zone to reject the plan-- Abide by the stakeholders recommendations. Listen to the Orient community. Please preserve Orient for our children and our grandchildren. Sincerely, Karen Braziller 640 Village Lane z•_ 22 pp �p 323 1362 { D LS 0 U MAR 1 2006 , To Whom it May Concern: We are vigorously opposed to any co m rcial use of the nn3LLL" house at the corner of Village Lane d -r ✓ient.�wd i _. As the parents of a 3 year old child, ml";;�u ely aware of the hazards of traffic on Route 25. As things are, many vehicles travel through this intersection at excessive speed, making turns onto and out of both Village Lane and Young's Road hazardous, and crossing the road challenging. The addition of a frequently -used, narrow commercial driveway nearly opposite Young's Road will effectively create a continuous, unmarked, and unregulated intersection along nearly 250' of Route 25 (from Oysterponds Lane to the far edge of Village Lane), situated along a curve. This is a recipe for tragedy. Add to this vision the image of a car full of tourists suddenly slowing or stopping to turn into the driveway upon spotting a sign, and an SW speeding to the ferry terminal, and you have a recipe for disaster. Additionally, we oppose the utilization of the property for any commercial purposes for other reasons: • It fails to meet code requirements (25-foot buffer zone between commercial ventures and residential property) we believe that the code requirements are not just the law, but exist for commonsense reasons. • We believe that the the commercial usage will encourage people to park on Village Lane too close to Route 25, creating a hazard for Eastbound vehicles turning South on Village Lane. • It will detrimentally alter the historical and present-day residential character of this part of Village Lane, and consequently quality of life and surrounding property values. • It fails to respect the long history of the house as a private dwelling, in a designated historical area. • There is no shortage of suitable locations for commercial ventures of this or any other nature, in Southold Town or Greenport Village. • The owner of the property has demonstrably and repeatedly misrepresented his intentions for the property, in private and public forums and even in official filings. There is no way to know how he will try to take advantage of any new allowances, and no evidence to suggest that he will restrict himself to the terms of the applied -for variance. Sincerely, Ed Manning Jane Friesen 690 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 Igil- mother." ❑ It is regrettable that Dr. Franklin never got to see Orient, but his journey proves t i at tic . 1119 s n way was passable by carriage as far as Southold, and probably was equally good the rest of the way. So travel the length of the Island was something that could be accomplished by wheeled vehicles well over 200 years ago. It is interesting, though, that until after the Revolution, Long Island had no integrated postal services. Overton's "Long Island Story" says that mail for Brooklyn, Queens, and Nassau Counties was delivered from New York, while people in Suffolk County got their mail ferried over from New London, and goes on to say that during the Revolution, "a Scotchman, named Dunbar, rode once in two weeks through the Island with the mail. Dunbar was not a public official but undertook the work as a private enterprise, and people must have loved him for it in those trying days. His route was east by the north shore and return by the south. The day on which he was due any place was called `post day'. In addition to the few letters and news papers a week old, he brought all the news of the road over which he had travelled." Af this point in the road Dunbar might possibly have seen General Wooster's troops parading. Augustus Griffin remembers that spectacle, but was too young to have taken note of "post day". ❑ There was a time when going east from here was a memorable experience: a writer named R. R. Wilson who visited Orient in 1900 said: "This road is shaded almost continuously with patriarchal cherry trees, so that in May a snow storm seems always to be travelling just ahead of you, so white are the masses of tree tops on either side, and a ride along it is an experience to be remembered for a lifetime." (Where are the snows of yesteryear?) Here we have late 19th, early 20th century outward appear- ances covering up an old house that has been extensively, if not almost completely, rebuilt since the first structure indicated on this site in 1860, at which time it was occu- pied by two seafaring men and their families —Captain William Hubbard, and David Edwards, a fisherman. The house was still occupied by David Edwards in 1873. The building 14b appears to have been remodelled before the turn of the century, virtually enveloping the older house. °f 14 € 7 7l r7! MAR 1 4 2006 77 4 • C Edwin J. Blesch Jr. P.O. Box 430 Orient, NY 11957 Jeri Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 March 9, 2006 Dear Jeri and Planning Board Members: ,., E ^!� MAR 1 3 2006 I urge you all to "do the right thing" in the matter of the application of Mr. Robert Ehrlich to open an antique shop, gift shop, auction house on what many of us Orienters feel to be an inappropriate site. The Town has a 25' buffer law precisely to allow neighbors distance from what they might consider alien enterprises. To override that strong language of the Town Code and provide a waiver allowing more parking would be counter to intent. As a retired teacher, my whole life's accomplishments are invested in my property across the street. I love this place! Of course I fear a business on the comer could morph into something quite unacceptable. There are no guarantees that if once opened as a business now, it may eventually become offensive in another incarnation down the line. Yes, Mr. Ehrlich has his rights, but to cater to his and not those of his directly affected neighbors — and the whole hamlet by extension — would be prejudicial. Nimby'ism is a word usually used with a dirty seffish connotation, but it is sometimes a healthy thing. Those of us most intimately affected would be crazy not to bellyache. It means we are proud of our tranquil environment and want to preserve it to the best of our abilities. I strongly feel that the Town made a big mistake in 1988 when it rezoned the property from residential to business. Now it is time to repair that lack of foresight and judgment. Please use your collective good sense to preserve our unique hamlet's identity: deny the present application until the zoning glitch is resolved. Yours truly, cc. Supervisor Scott Russell Edmond L. Papantonio 55 Village Lane Orient New York IIY57 FAX 631 765 3136 Plen�� 9oeid Southold Town Planning Board Southold. NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Robert Ehrlich 22540 NYS Route 25, Orient, N.Y. 11957 SCTM: 1000-18-5-5, hearing, Southold Town Planning Board, March 13, 2006, 6:10 p.m. Dear Board Members: Have you ever been to an auction? I have, and the first thing that you notice is people, lots of them, milling about and competing to purchase objects. An auction thrives on volumes of people to bid up the price. The property in question is one quarter of an acre with parking for about 8 cars. Ten people cannot make an auction; an auction house needs scores to be successful. Where are these people going to park? If the Planning Board approves use of this parcel as an auction house, it is accepting that there are two places Nvhwa visitors can park. They can trespass on the neighboring properties (a crime, I believe) or they can park on the street. Let's examine two clear examples of street panting in the area. When neighboring religious institutions hold services, a Southold'l own policeman is required to regulate traffic flow and insure that attendees do not inadvertently block neighboring driveways. And this on sleepy Sunday woruizigs, when traffic is mimmtal. How is it proposed to regulate the street parking on summer weekend evenings when auctions are most likely to be held? Is it proposed that the Town of Southold regularly pay for a traffic policeman? Left to their own devices, auction house attendees would behave no differently from the second example of street -side parking in the area: the mob scene at Orient Point of cars parked, frequently for up to a mile back, while their occupants busy themselves with other activities. But Orient Point is a dead end, not a busy intersection which the whole Hamlet uses. The intersection of Main Road and Village Lane in Orient is the main point of ingress and egress to the village and bayside propertics. It is not a dead end suitable for on -street parking but rather a heavily trafficked choke point for the Harslet. Extensive street -side parking in the intersection would disrupt the busy traffic flow in and out of the village. Z0/70 3]bd 01NlNVd1dV L5��0ES5T6T FG]:e? 900Zi60/0 In front of tha property in question rums an increasingly popular (and already quite dangerous) bicycle path. Street parking would block usage of the bicycle path and force cyclists to veer into the car lanes. The eastbound car lane directly in front of the property supports thousands of can daily hurrying to the Cross Sound perry and the Colmecticut gambling casinos. Their impatience is legendary, and massive strecu-side parking at a main intersection would only increase the already too familiar sound of sirens racing to the scene of a traffic accident. Let's face it: this property might have been zoned for business in the 1980s, but given its postage stamp parking and the traffic realities of 2006, it is hard to see how it is viable as a retail location. The Town of Southold has, over the years, by inaction or connivance (neither a happy thought), permitted this stretch of Main Road to serve primarily as a frccway for Groutied gamblers and New England travelers on their way out of town, to the detriment of ail Southold residents and particularly those of us, including the owner of the property in question, who border the Main Road. For the Board to approve use of this propene as an auction house would be the equivalent, of burying its collective head in the sand. You are, after all, a planning board, sworn to anticipate, and plan fur, the consequences of your approvals, not serve as a rubber stamp for the neverland fantasies of a frustrated property owner who took an economic risk in purchasing a non -viable commercial property. He is now looking to make the Town, and his ucighbms, pay for his nustake. Creating such a precedent will support the argument of any property owner, myself included, who would appear before you to move for an exception or change due to "hardship." I am astounded that we have reached the stage of a `°final" public hearing on this ill- conceived application, and question the common sense of those who have approved it hitherto. Moreover, as a taxpayer, I do not wish to finance the litigation expenses, and awards which will surely ensue, payable by the Town of Southold, in defense of negligence actions resulting fl-om the inevitable traffic accidents, and auondtuil lrwua i grief, that will result from congesting an area that has no business being further stretced. I respectfully request that this letter be read at the referenced hearing. Yours truly, Edmond L. Papantonio cc, Suffolk Times �Cj itry ouU-/e-S 5 ZO/ZO 3JVd OIN.J4VdVd7 '99['©E3b TEti ^_fh :EL 9E0i:!59i£0 KERI CHRIST S JUSnN OCKENDEN �� 227I 5 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, NY I 1957 (53 I) 323- 14 10 KACHRIST@RCN . COM February 28, 2006 Jeri Woodhouse Chairperson, Southold Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Dear Ms Woodhouse: We are writing to advise you of our concerns with respect to the appAca Mr. Ehrlich that is currently before the Town Board regarding the dev pment of the property on the southwest corner of Main Road and Village Lane. This important issue is to be discussed at an upcoming meeting of the Southold Planning Board and we hope it will receive your careful attention. We reside at 22715 Main Road in Orient on the northeast corner of Young's Road and Main Road, directly across from the Ehrlich property. We are relatively new to Orient, having bought our house in October 2004. However, in a very short time we have learned firsthand of the traffic hazards on our two lane "country road," and the dangerous intersection of Young's Road, Main Road and Village Lane. In September 2005 we were involved in an accident that was very nearly serious in front of the Ehrlich property. A driver speeding to the ferry terminal attempted to pass us on the left hand side as we tamed onto Young's Road. A police report was made. The driver stated that he thought that we were signaling to turn onto Village Lane, when we had actually signaled to turn onto Young's Road to get to the driveway of our house. The driver's mistaken assumption presumably caused the accident. Recently, another accident occurred in front of the Ehrlich property, and Orient resident Troy Gustayson and his wife luckily escaped serious injury when a drunk driver forced them onto the shoulder of the road. Customers visiting the Ehrlich property will presumably park on this shoulder, as ferry customers commonly do at Orient Point, and churchgoers do in front of the Congregational Church. The lack of a clearly -designated shoulder will make any accidents which occur at the entrance to Orient Village more serious. Most everyone in Orient has "near -miss" stories like these, and it is no secret that there are serious traffic congestion problems on Main Road, especially in the summer months. The area in and around Village Lane is a particularly dangerous spot because the traffic can move in four ways at that point. This causes us to question the wisdom of placing any it 0 commercial establishment at the entrance to the village, which is likely to distract drivers' attention and disrupt traffic. We understand that Mr. Ehrlich has applied for permission to develop the property as an antique and gift shop. Prior to this amendment, Mr. Ehrlich planned to develop the property as a caf6 with live music, applied for a liquor license and went so far as to install restaurant equipment prior to receiving the necessary Town permits. In the end Mr. Ehrlich's efforts to obtain a liquor license were unsuccessful and the equipment uninstalled. However, this lack of good faith and failure to abide by the Towns permit process is less than encouraging. Unsurprisingly, we in Orient have little confidence in Mr. Ehrlich's intention to stick to his current plan to run an "antique shop." Given that Orient is a national and state historic landmark we question why Southold Town would wish to permit any commercial establishment at the entrance to the village, which would necessarily undermine the village's historic and distinctive character. In reading the Hamlet Study, we are struck by the fact that the present application is entirely inconsistent with the Towns vision for Orient. The Hamlet Study specifically states that Orients historic character must be preserved, protected and reinforced, and that any facility that is likely to generate traffic volume and that targets a large scale market outside the village would be completely "inconsistent and incompatible" in Orient. Our house was built in 1858 by Honorable Lewis A. Edwards, a New York State senator who served in the Senate from 1868-69 and has a long and fascinating history that is intimately connected to the village. We are proud to be the custodians of this historic house and concerned by the issue of its endurance. We are doing our best to maintain and safeguard the house and its garden, including a privet hedge that is a century old, for the community. However, the onslaught of traffic makes our efforts more difficult, and we do not welcome further traffic hazards or commercial establishments which are clearly inconsistent with the historic and residential character of the village. Given the significant and as of yet unresolved traffic issues in Orient, we urge Southold Town to carefully consider the reasonably foreseeable hazardous situation that will be created by any commercial establishment at the entrance to the village, such as that proposed by Mr. Ehrlich. We strongly urge the Town Board to return the property to Residential zoning, its historical and more appropriate use, and preserve and protect Orient Village. Traffic on the Main Road has increased significantly since Commercial zoning was, in our view mistakenly, granted and the hazards associated with operating a commercial establishment at this comer have increased similarly. Should the Town Board determine after consultation with the Town attorney that it is legally impossible to re -zone the Ehrlich property at this time, then we respectfully request that the Town Board institute a moratorium to allow time for further consideration of what is to be done to address safety and historic preservation issues, including: (1) obtaining Mr. Ehrlich's written assurances that he will not seek a liquor license or utilize the property in any manner that is likely to interfere with the quiet enjoyment of the surrounding properties or compromise the historic character of our village, along with monetary penalties for any violation. Prohibited activities would include late night business, having live or piped in music or installing commercial signage and lighting beyond specific limits set by the Town (2) exploring the possibility of purchasing the property from Mr. Ehrlich, either alone or in conjunction with the village of Orient, and putting it to a more compatible and beneficial use for the community Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, �;r�" j.tskj(dA. Keri Christ & Justin Ockenden To: Southold Planning Board Members P.O. Box 1179 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairperson Southold, NY 11971-0959 Joseph L. Townsend Kenneth L. Edwards Martin H. Sidor George Solomon Southold Town Board Members Southold Town Hall Scott A. Russell, Supervisor P.O. Box 1179 Justice Louisa P. Evans Southold, NY 11971-0959 Councilman William P. Edwards Councilman Thomas H. Wickham Councilman Daniel C. Ross Councilman Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Southold Zoning Board Members 53095 Main Road Ruth D. Oliva, Chairperson P.O. Box 1179 Gerard P. Goehringer Southold, NY 11971-0959 James Dinizio Michael A. Simon Leslie Kanes Weisman • C, Randolph, Linda From: Semon, Bruno Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:13 PM To: Edwards Ken (E-mail); George Solomon (E-mail); Jeri Woodhouse (E-mail); Joseph Townsend (E-mail); Kalin, Carol; L'Eplattenier, Victor; Martin Sidor Jr. (E-mail); Randolph, Linda; Terry, Mark; Trezza, Anthony Subject: FW: to the editor -Erlich correspondence HE edlet%.doc Attached is a letter received on the Erlich site plan. Thanks Bruno -----Original Message ----- From; Fredrica Wachsberger [mailto:flwssn@optonline.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:38 AM To: Tim Kelly Cc: Russell, Scott; jeri woodhouse Subject: to the editor Fredrica Wachsberger Please note new email: flwssn@optonline.net 1 SJeF F-01 March 6, 2006 05 VIL— To the Editor: What is the responsibility of Town Government for correcting a problem caused by Town Government? This question should be addressed at the public Planning Board meeting next Monday, which will consider an application for an antiques/craft/auction gallery at the corner of Village Lane and Route 48 in Orient. This property, which is at the entrance to the National Historic District and has always been a residence, was arbitrarily rezoned "Business" about 20 years ago, despite the fact that it couldn't support Business Zone requirements, such as a 25' buffer between the parking lot and adjoining residences. It was also on an already dangerous corner, which has become much more dangerous because of the sometimes reckless ferry traffic passing on the right or crossing the yellow line. We are very concerned that casual roadside parking invited by this type of retail establishment, on a site with limited parking and road frontage, could create serious obstacles to visibility on an intersection already partially impeded by historic monuments bisecting the streets. The intersection is crossed by schoolchildren on foot and on bicycle, and accesses the Post Office to the south and the public beach to the north. It has already been the site of several accidents. We are asking the present Town government to correct the Town's earlier error and return this property to its original, appropriate "Residential" zone. By the same token, we applaud the Town Board's suit to roll back Cross Sound Ferry traffic to 1995 levels. The lack of will on the part of previous Town Governments to enforce Town zoning regulations and State environmental regulations has permitted uncontrolled expansion, which cannot continue. Establishing firm, realistic limits at Orient Point will, one hopes, force the opening of additional ferry terminals closer to the origin of the traffic; there is no way the huge potential expansion of casino and vehicle traffic can continue to squeeze into our historic road. Positive Town action confronting this reality was long overdue. Sincerely, Freddie Wachsberger Southold Citizens for Safe Roads PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 QF SOU)yO Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: l� # Town Hall Annex CA ac 54375 State Route 25 �O (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 6, 2006 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Ms. Claudia King-Ramone 110-07 73rd Road Apt. 65H Forest Hills, NY 11375 Dear Ms. King-Ramone: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 *Public Hearing set for 6:10 p.m. Monday. March 13, 2006 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing.* All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, I rilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND March 6, 2006 Mr. Troy Gustayson tgustav@optonline.net Dear Mr. Gustayson: n MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 0f SO[/jyo Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: 1� Town Hall Annex rn ac 54375 State Route 25 !' �O �OIyC�(fi� (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 *Public Hearing set for 6:10 p.m. Monday. March 13, 2006 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing.* All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson 5 ��F SOUTALD CITIZENS FOR SAN ROADS-1- SOUTHOLD TOWN - A Destination;,-A►4E►Ydor February 27, 2006 Planning Board Chairman Jeri Woodhouse Members of the Planning Board Town Hall Southold, New York Dear Chairman and Planning Board Members, sontbold WIT, Ptlnro Bo I am enclosing an aerial photograph of the intersection of Village Lane and Route 48, to demonstrate visually the potential danger that would be created by the approval of Robert Ehrlich's application for a retail business in the southwest corner property. The decision by a previous Town government to rezone this property, which has always been a residence, to Business, was, we believe, an ill-considered one, given that it was never big enough to conform to Business zoning requirements such as a 25' buffer between parking and residential properties (the aerial view makes clear how close the residences are). Also, the intersection was already a dangerous one, although not as dangerous as it has become with the enormous increase in ferry traffic. We believe that it is the responsibility of the present Southold Town governmental bodies to take responsibility for the previous error and correct it, because of the serious negative impact the existing zoning could have on traffic safety. It is the potential threat to the safety of our citizens that concerns SCSR. The aerial view of the intersection clearly demonstrate the following factors: 1. Youngs Road and Village Lane enter the Main Road at different points rather than opposite each other, creating two different comers, close together, where turns are made. 2. Each is forked, with a center feature, historic in both cases (the Buttonwood Tree and the Civil War Monument), limiting visibility 3. The corner of the Ehrlich property was cut off, presumably to allow for the construction of the Monument, and is therefore curved into Village Lane, eliminating a true corner. 4. The parking lot is very limited, with one ingress/egress and no turning tail, creating the possibility of a backup into the road. It should further be noted that the Oysterponds School is east of the intersection, which schoolchildren cross on foot or bicycle twice a day, and Youngs Road leads to the public beach, generating foot, bicycle and automobile traffic the summer; further, that traffic for the a� n___ ne . n------ � ATV I InAA . 9Z41 A717 "AAA not ferry is often speeding, and frequently the drivers attempt to pass turning cars on the shoulder or by crossing the double line. The application before the Planning Board is for an "antique/craft/gift shop"; the very nature of such a shop —and indeed the only way such an enterprise could succeed- is to attract casual drivers to stop and take a look at the wares. I urge the Board members to study the photographs and entertain the following (hardly unlikely) scenarios and the degree to which they would impede visibility and create a serious traffic hazard: 1. The car casually stops on the road or curve and a. it is abandoned while its occupants enter the shop b. somebody waits in the car while the other goes to look- in any case, unwilling to bother to enter the parking lot until a decision has been made to stay 2. The car enters the parking lot, finds it full, or meets another car exiting, and attempts to back out. I believe that any retail enterprise involving frequent pull -ins and pull-outs would create a dangerous situation at this particular corner for the reasons I have stated, and would put at risk our schoolchildren, bikers, and the driving public at large. Leaving the zoning as it is would also leave open the possibility of an application for a liquor license (as was previously attempted); or of combining the property with the one next door to create a large business in an otherwise residential area (and at the entrance to the Historic District), something the stakeholders expressly wanted to avoid. The property in question has never been used as other than a residence. SCSR urges the Planning Board to reject this application because it threatens the safety of Southold citizens. Sincerely, 1 1 Freddie Wachsberger President, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads Tuesday, February 21, 2006 f Y� r Claudia (King) Ramone 110-07 73`d Road Apt. 6H Forest Hills, NY 11375 Southold Town Planning Board P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Members of the Board: I am writing to you in regards to the upcoming public hearing to be held in March in regards to the Ehrlich property which boarders our family home at #130 Village Lane in Orient. Unfortunately, I will be traveling out of the country and will not be able to attend the meeting. However, I did want to express my concerns to the Board, in writing, with regards to the potential commercial development of the property adjacent to our home. This past week, I visited the location and was disappointed to see that the Town had allowed the owner of the adjacent property to raze trees, grass and an outbuilding that had provided some privacy and quite between the two properties. In their place, a graveled parking lot/driveway has been laid right up to the edge of our property line. We are aware that the Town requires, by law, a "buffer zone" of 25 feet between a commercial parking lot and the property line of a private residence. If the Town is to allow the owner of the property to move forward with his plans to open a business at that location we ask that you, at least, require him to abide by this law. Otherwise, we are concerned that traffic, headlights and noise emanating from the business will quickly degrade the quality of life on our property. Please contact me directly with any further questions that you may have. Sincerely, Claudia J. (Kin $$) Ramone Tel: (718) 710-0745 l 7006 IL. Page 1 of 1 Semon, Bruno m To: PB Site Plan Staff; PB Members, mt Subject: FW: Email on the Ehrlich property received today Hello, I will print this out and add it to the Erhlich Site Plan Correspondence file. Attached is an email I received from Jeri today. I felt everybody should read it. Thanks Bruno -----Original Message ----- From. Jeriwood@aol.com [mailto:Jeriwood@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 PM To: Semen, Bruno Cc: Terry, Mark Subject: Fwd: Ehrlich property Taste of the North Fork 8595A Cox Lane, Unit #3 Cutchogue, NY 11935 Phone:631-734-6100 Fax:631-734-7031 Website: www.atasteofthenorthfork.com r�- ;L - 9 2000 2/9/2006 w 0 • Semon, Bruno From: Troy Gustayson [tgustav@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:39 AM To: Jeri Woodhouse Subject: Ehrlich property Dear Jeri: Please consider this an official communication with you as chair of the Planning Board. As you know, Joan and I were involved in a serious accident earlier this week at the intersection of Village Lane and the Main Road. Our vehicle was side -swiped by a drunk driver (at least he's been charged with DWI) as we were preparing to turn into Village Lane from the eastbound lane of the Main Road -- in other words, right in front of the Ehrlich property. We might have avoided the crash, but the shoulder of the roadway was too narrow to allow us to pull our car entirely off the roadway. As you know, this is a very busy intersection, and we are concerned that additional accidents will occur there if the Ehrlich property is used for commercial purposes. In our opinion, this property never should have been rezoned commercial, and we sincerely hope the Planning Board will not approve any plan that will exacerbate this problem. Thank you for considering out point of view. :Troy Gustayson (on behalf of myself and Joan) 1 January 30, 2006 Douglas Constant PO Box 225 Orient, NY 11957 Southold Town Planning Board Jeri Woodhouse, Chair Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, • M - 2 2006 "The purpose of the transition buffer is to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. A buffer area shall (italics mine) be required along all boundaries of a non residential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. Such buffer area shall comply with at least the following minimum standards: A. The buffer area shall be located within the boundaries of the subject Property. B. The minimum width of buffer areas shall be as follows: (4) General Business District: twenty-five (25) feet." (section 100-213 Transition buffer area — Southold Town Code) The attached photos are of the Constant family and King family lot lines and are included here to show the proximity of our properties and the absolute necessity of the transition buffer areas. Recently, I was asked what I would like to see on the Ehrlich site. My flippant response was anything as long as a twenty-five (25) foot buffer area protects us from it. Upon further reflection what I would like is for the Town of Southold to put its money where its mouth is and down zone the property to the pre -"master plan" residential zoning. That Mr. Ehrlich deserves to be compensated for his hardship and how much is for someone else to decide. The capricious up zoning of this parcel from residential to commercial shows that little or no consideration was given to whether or not the parcel had the space for parking and transition buffer areas. Are there other problems caused by the implementation of the master plan? Are there other properties in sensitive locations throughout the town? Others may speak of whether this issue is appropriate in an historic district or whether it conforms to the recent Stakeholder's report. We simply expect to have our property rights protected by section 100-213 of the Town Code which appeas to have considered this situation when it was written. The required buffer area will protect our quality of life and property values from being negatively impacted by commercial activities wedged in amongst a residential area. Sincerely, , ,f lzylkv-A� BMW`_ .. K i /tiz w �t-�7ur�e..�L6x��c.e CPiuc� /fi?1. �2r�Y�cd i� egm,riv4� �2=t r- • • • La:. 41 / a Dec 19 M05 12 59PM KUbtnia Hmtni�lhiv . OwENTAS'sogmo December, 2005 A FEW WORDS OF EXPLANATION AND A REQUEST Anyone who has been following local events has hueard of the Orient Association, but some of you ma not know whaLO is ar ttmt OA wants you to be a member. You may have joined the Laboi y Takds Our Roads" rally at Orient PoirK, sponsored by OA, or attended the Oum in ber for dates for Southold towcn offices We area civic association, fouin 19134 to provide a forum for discussion of issues of concern to the community andresenttheviewsofstate officials Belowarebrief maries of our most important current activities Membership in the Orient Association is open to all residents or. property owners in Orient. We are sometimes confused with OHS (the Oysterponds Historical Society) or OCA (Oysterponds Community Activities) but unlike these worthy organisations, we own no txnlst As an OA member, you get no special privileges except the opportunity to shape OA's positions aril the d that your membership Increases the' power of O[ient'5 voice in the town. Duesk�a ee$i0 a Additional oamtibutions are welcome. These funds pay for newsletters and other mail for rental of Poquatudc Hall and for bgel help. Please send you dues to Orient Association, P.O. Box 282, Orient, NY 11957. THE "COFFEEHOUSE" In 2002, Robert Sikh received a iquor license and applied for permission to operate a coffeehouse in the Victorian home at the southwest corner of Village lane and Main Road. In his applic&Wn to the NYState Liquor Authority, he stated that it would be open from 7 am. to 10:30 p,m., with piped -in or. five enlertai menu Although the house has alwayyss been a private residence, the property was arbitrarily rezoned for oorr;mercial use about�20 years ago. Fearing the pots" Intrusion of noise and disruption in the Historic District and increased traffic around an already dangercxs intersection, some 250 residents signed a petition sponsored by OA, asking the liquor Authority to revoke Mr. E rlich's license. OA alerted the NY State Uq" Board th>at-ft Room was apparently obtained under false premises and it was revoked. However, an application is again before, the Planning Board for use of the building as an antiques store. Our fear. is that if the application is apppproved the owner will oft h a commercial oatificate of occupancy and be able to reapply for the l'gUor license and convertthe pfopentjr to a ooifeehouselbarlreetaurarrt. OA's position is that while the best use for the prope continues to be as a private residence, a resklerniallbusiness use such as attomey's or dooWs offices would be acceptable and would be fair to the property owner. Even though the site is commercially zoned there is no way to the plan submitted• ID the Plannirx,) Board can conform to businesszoning requirements for parking buffers. etc. Our position is P%tthe Board has every justification to reject this application. As . always, community MW can make the ddfererm: we urge Orient residers to attend Planning Board meetings on this issue. We will keep you informed of dates and times. THE CROSS SOUND FERRY Concern about ferry traffic was an issue when the Orient Association was founded in 1984. In 1995, when CSF initiated its high-speed ferry without planning permission, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads, originally a committee of OA, was expanded to include aii of Southold Town. Despite an enormous amount of work by voturtbers, the cooperation of FROM : Joy Malley 6 Planning Board ofo Jeri Woodhouse Southold Town Hall 53096 Main Raid P.O. Box Wil Southold, NY 11971 Via FAX: 631-7E5-3136 September 26, 2006 FAX NO. : 0210515493 Edwin J. Bleach Jr. 4a Youngs Road P.O. Box 430 Orlent, N.Y. 41957-04M Re. Ehrlich Proposal Door Members of the Planning Board: Sep. 25 2005 04:11PM P1 IP•�), z <1 if, at I(i • s --� I wftkft you from Cape Town, South Africa, since I obviously cannot be there in person for your deliberations on Monday. I was one of several of Ortsnt's community members present about three years ago when the proposal for a coftse house on Mr. Ehrlich's Property was first floated. I remember wall the on -sills visit of several members of the Planning Board, then ohaired by Mr. Orlowski, on a cold March Saturday rooming. The visitors dearly indicated immediately that there would be inadequate parking. They do indicated that the community would welcome other sorts of oommercial enterprises that would require Was traft In and out of the property onto Main Road. One suggestion made, for example, was professional offices for an architerti or lawyer or accountant. In the meantime Mr.Ehdic h continued to work toward his proposal, making extensive interior changes and removing tress and a two -oar gerage. It Is my understending that the present revised proposal beta you also doe* not meet Town code requirements without substantial waivers. I urge you not to reduoe any buffers which despoil and depredate neighbors' property values. The proposal is vague and still does not address the dangers inherent in the location. Nor does it protect the community from future morphings should commercial use as a retail shop be commenced. It Is also my understanding that the Building Department ordered the rarm al of the elaborate kitchen equipment irm ialled for the previous proposal be removed before proceeding. Has this in fact been done? h not, why not? I hope that your tabard will find an equitable solution which will guarantee protection of the community's unique character. Thank you Yours truly, September 23, 2005 Douglas Constant PO Box 225 Orient, NY 11957 Southold Town Planning Board Jeri Woodhouse, Chair Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, We read with extreme interest "Trying to Trim the Green" page 23 of the Suffolk Times, 9/22/05. On the subject of delivery trucks — how would these trucks enter and exit Mr. Ehrlich's driveway? Would they be backing in from Route 25 or backing out on to Route 25? Obviously, space behind his residence limits K-turns and how about those beeper alarms when the delivery truck shifts to reverse? Ms. Groocock's paragraph two is on target as to the necessity of buffer zones separating commercial parking lots and residential properties. That, it would seem, was why buffer zone requirements are part of our building and zoning codes. Language such as "shall" and "minimum standards" appear to leave not room for interpretation. Were the Planning Board or ZBA to violate the standards which protect owners of residential properties these owners would suffer a significant loss as to the desirability and thence resale value to their homes. (We have been told by our insurance agency that our home owner's premiums will rise if a business opens next door.) The Mullen question and the Ehrlich situation are, in fact, different in that the Mullen operation has been in business for fifty years and the Ehrlich property still does not have a C of O for a business use on the property. The Ehrlich property must conform to standards currently required in 2005. It is regrettable that the Town of Southold did not exercise due diligence when it up -zoned this property when the Master Plan (perhaps a misnomer) was approved in the late 80's. We insist that the twenty-five foot buffer be applied to protect our homes from this unwanted and noxious project. 4r re��� Dou s Constant For the Constant and King families su 2 6 2005 t3�S. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 2, 2005 OF PINING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Skip Wachsberger P.O. Box 307 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. chsberger: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews be given as requiredand approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearin hearing and offer their comm comments to the Planning Board. d parties may y the Town Code. All intereste g. Notice will y attend the The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, ilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson August 2, 2005 Mr. Skip Wachsberger P.O. Box 307 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Wachsberger: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson August 2, 2005 Mr. Charles R. Dean 295 Village Lane P.O. Box 307 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. Dean: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich, The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 2, 2005 Ms. Jane Smith 1750 Platt Road Orient, NY 11957 Dear Ms ith: n MAILING ADDRESS: �oF soor P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: CA Town Hall Annex • O 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1936 Fag: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, erilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 2, 2005 I PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Charles R. Dean 295 Village Lane P.O. Box 307 Orient, NY 11957 J Dear Mean: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765.3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, 20�yn B. Woodhouse Chairperson 0 s- 295 Village Lane 5 " P.O. Box 307 Orient, New York 11957 July 20, 2005 Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Dear Board Members: I live across Village lane within sight of ft Erlch Property which is currently under review. I urge you not to grant a variance allowing Mr. Erlich to ignore the requirement of a 25 foot buffer zone between his "parking loC and his neighbors' property. His long-time residential house at the comer of Village Lane and the Main Road is an entirely inappropriate place for a business for two reasons. The first and most important is the issue of traffic safety. The intersection, with cars often coming all too fast around the curve to the west, is already perilous with frequent ferry traffic. Adding to the danger is the fad that Young's Road and Village Lane intersect with the Main Road at different places. We certainly do not need the additional hazard of Mr. Erich's retail customers turning into and off of the Main Road only a few feet from that difficult intersection. Undoubtedly, some of his customers will even park along the Main Road while they run in to shop at Mr. Erich's business, further complicating the intersection. The second reason that the site is inappropriate for a business is that it is located at the entrance to the historic Hamlet of Orient The most sacred spot of the village —the monument to the men and boys of Orient who fought in the War of the Rebellion—ts located at that junction. Opening a business there would be akin to opening a hamburger joint next to the Washington Monument I realize that there are often good reasons to waive rules. Often it is in the best interests of everyone to do so. But your approving this application to waive the requirement of the buffer zone will do harm to the community. It is just this type of excess that the buffer zone rule is intended to curb. Clearly this property is a terrible place to establish a business, and the fad that there is insufficient space to create a parking lot within the commercial rules is further proof that Mr. Erlich's project is ill-conceived. By insisting that the riles be followed, the planning board can be proud that it has helped to keep Southold safe and to preserve one of the most beautiful places on tong Island. Please do not grant the waiver that Mr. Erlich has requested. Orients fate is in your hands. Sincerely, Charles R. Dean Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York,11971-0959 Attention: Jerri Woodhouse 0 Skip Wachsberger P.O.Box 307 Orient, New York 11957 July 21, 2005 Dear Members of the Southold Town Planning Board, I attended the Planning Board work session last Monday, July 18. I would like to thank you for taking the time to consider all the situations, as far as new building and changes in existing buildings, that affect our way of life here in Southold, and for your devotion to detail in considering these situations. My particular concern is with the application for business use on the Ehrlich property at the entrance to Village Lane in Orient. Based on what I understood from the work session, I am not convinced the scale plans presented by Mr. Ehrlich's lawyer are accurate. I heard Mr. Semon say he detected a discrepancy. I urge you to conduct an independent measurement of the site, specifically of the proposed parking area and of the curb along Route 48 where the new curb cut is proposed. Please make certain there are the required 50 feet to the corner from the proposed curb cut, and that there is really and truly enough parking space. Before this project goes forward, the actual and real footage must be ascertained. In addition, I urge the Planning Board to uphold the Code requirement of a 25 foot barrier between a proposed business and any neighboring residence. This is the exact situation for which that code was adopted, to protect residents from the noise and traffic of a neighboring business. Mr. Ehrlich's lawyer referred to other existing businesses on Village Lane. As Mr. Semon pointed out, these are all pre- existing non -conforming properties, and are examples of why this code was put in place for new buildings. There is always controversy when a unique, unspoiled area is scheduled for development, whether it is the Amazon rainforest, Alaska wildlife refuge, or our special Village Lane. There is no controversy about the fact that once a unique, unspoiled area is lost, it is lost forever and there is no way to get it back. Don't let that happen here in Orient! Don't let this happen on your watch! -, Thank you, n Sincerely, Clyde Wachsberger Jul 21 05 02:55p fredrice wachsberger 516-323-3501 3OUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAFE ROADS lSOUTHOLD TOWN — .4 Destination -- Not A Corridor July 21, 2005 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairman Members of the Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road, Southold, New York Dear Mrs. Woodhouse and Board Members, The decision before you on the Ehrlich property is critical for the safety and quality of life of Orient residents, because approval ofthe present site plan would permit not only the antique shop that is the subject of the present application, but could support other, possibly much more detrimental rises permitted under the General Business designation. Undoubtedly the ill-considered zone change that was effected twenty years ago has made your decision more difficult, but it should not force you to attempt to fit a square peg into a round hole, as this application attempts to do. The site is clearly most appropriate for a residence, which it has always been, or a residential office, which would require space for fewer cars and would not necessitate the frequent drive -in -and -out of retail establishments. The application ignores two of the zoning code's most important protections of a residential area: the 25' barrier between parking lots and residences, and the 50' distance between the cub cut and the comer. Even if the barrier were 5' with a grass strip, what protection does grass offer from noise and fumes? Indeed, the fronts of cars could overhang the grass. The actual barrier would be a fence and two -foot shrub: barely more than 10% of the requirement. (Nor has the kind of shrub been specified; how tall could the shrubs grow, pressed up against the fence?) Approval of such a drastic variation from the zoning requirements would set a terrible precedent and severely damage the quality of life of the neighbors in a historic, residential district. An active driveway so close to an already dangerous intersection would represent another serious infringement of the zoning code and severely threaten the safety of the schoolchildren, walkers, and bikers, as well as other drivers. It is conceivable that a filled parking area would cause a back-up of traffic on the road, casual parking on the road, and even parking on the Candyman property, imposing therefore on commercial as well as residential neighbors and creating a serious traffic hazard. The "driveway" has been saved clean of grass from the stems of the Candyman's hedge to the wall of the house; it looks raw and unaesthetic, and it is difficult to determine where the actual property line lies. The safety concern about a walkway around the house is a valid one. ,p t. 9 .2 S1b:F 3.S, PO Box 25 • Greenport, NY 11944 - 631.477-0444 • Email: saferoadaQoptonline.net Jul 21 05 02:55p fredrica wachsberser 516-323-3501 p.3 • • It would appear to me that an insistence on the uses available under General Business zoning should be accompanied by acceptance of the restrictions which are placed on it. This application tries to have it both ways, and should not be permitted to move forward, Sincerely, Freddie Wachsberger Vice President, Southold Citizens for Safe Roads PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLLSM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Mr. Edwin Blesch, Jr. 45 Youngs Road P.O. Box 430 Orient, NY 11957-0430 Dear Mr. esch': Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, ZI Jerilyn .Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLL9M J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Mr. & Mrs. Edmond Papantonio 55 Village Lane Orient, NY, 11957 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Papantonio: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn toodhouse Chairperson n PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON July 15, 2005 MAILING ADDRESS: AOF SO(/r yQ� P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: CATown Hall Annex • 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) COMM Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1838 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. & Mrs. Edward Webb 420 Village Lane Box 194 Orient, NY 0 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Webb: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON July 15, 2005 n MAILING ADDRESS: �QF so P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 .If. T OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex G �Q l'YCQU 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Mr. Douglas Constant P.O. Box 225 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Mr. nstant: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Ms. Freddie Wachsberger Southold Citizens for Safe Roads P.O. Box 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Ms. sberger: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1936 Fax: 631 765.3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn . Woodhouse Chairperson C� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Mr. Tony Just 195 Village Lane Orient, NYC Dear Mr ust: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Ms. Anne Hopkins 380 Platt Road P.O. Box 82 Orient, NY 11957 Dear Ms. ins: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 • MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1935 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn . Woodhouse Chairperson PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 15, 2005 Mr. Clyde Wachsberger 3180 Orchard Street Orient, NY, 11957 Dear M . c sberger: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich. The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn . Woodhouse Chairperson July 20, 2005 To the Planning Board: Please consider carefully the property on the corner of Village Lane and the Main Rd in Orient. This property should never have been changed to commercial zoning, and the establishment of a business there would be a significant change for this community and create a potentially very dangerous situation. If they were to have any business to speak of, the parking facilities would be completely inadequate, and undoubtedly cars would park on the road. I live on Platt Rd. and can attest to the hazard created by the cars parked on the road across from Delicious (which I love) next door to the Orient Service Station. I am trying to train myself to go out the other way rather than exit Platt Rd on to Main Rd, because the visibility is often totally blocked by the parked cars and I have to pull out into oncoming traffic to see if any cars are coming. This situation added to the already problematic intersection at Village Lane and Main Rd would create a horrendous problem, endangering drivers and pedestrians, many of whom are children or dog -walkers. This would be a most unwelcome intrusion into our safe and tranquil community. Thank you for reading my letter. Jane Smith 1750 Platt Rd. Orient 323-1378 jansmith@optonline.net JUL 21 1A05 Town STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDINGlVi�--- 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 � JUN 2 3 2005 SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR June 17, 2005 Mr. Freddie Wachsberger, Vice President Southold Citizens For Safe Roads P.O Box 25 Greenport, NY 11944 Your May 26, 2005 Letter Route 25, Orient Dear Mr. Waschberger: Town Thank you for your letter to Mr. Mark Wolfgang, of my staff, concerning the Ehrlich property located on the south side of Route 25 at the intersection with Village Lane. The property and associated curb cut access that you have brought to our attention is currently in the review process for proposed commercial access to Route 25. The Town of Southold is responsible for regulating land usage and approving building permits. We are forwarding a copy of your letter to the Town for appropriate action to address your concerns. Our role in developments, such as this one, along or adjacent to the State Highway system, is to review the proposed work within the State Highway right-of-way (ROW) and to review the impact of the site generated traffic on the State Highway system. The developer must mitigate negative traffic impacts, which could require construction of turning lanes, highway widening, traffic signal improvements and other related work depending on the size and scope of the development. Once developers address those impacts to our satisfaction, we issue highway work permit(s) to allow developers to work within the State Highway right-of-way to carry out the necessary work. We do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Hopefully, this clarifies our Department's role in developments, such as this one. In this case the parcel in question currently has residential access to Route 25. The applicant is proposing commercial access to this parcel at the same location as the residential access. Access widening will be required to accommodate commercial traffic. As part of our review we have considered the placement of the access on the local street; however, the local street in this case is a non standard intersection that promotes a higher speed turning movement. This would decrease the level of safety for vehicles entering at this location. -• 0 Mr. Freddie Wachsberger June 17, 2005 Page 2 The access point on Route 25 provides sufficient sight distance for entering and exiting vehicles for the speed of the highway. As we stated above we do not have the authority to deny access to a State Highway except along a controlled or limited access highway. Route 25, at this location, is not a controlled or limited access highway; therefore, once the applicant can provide a design that reasonably meets our standards, submits an application with associated fees and insurance we must issue a Highway Work Permit. We will discuss your request to establish "No Parking" through this section of Route 25 with the Town of Southold. Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention at the above address. Thank you for your interest in this matter. veryrgnal By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold w/copy of letter attached SAS:MW:DW SOUT • LD CITIZENS FOR SPE ROADS SOUTHOLD TOWN —A Destination -- Not A Corridor May 27, 2005 Josh Horton, Supervisor Southold Town Councilmen Dear Josh and Board Members, The application by Mr. Robert Ehrlich for planning permission for a shop at the comer of Village Lane and Route 48 in Orient is of great concern. This particular property has never been used for anything but a residence; it was arbitrarily and, in our opinion, wrongly rezoned from residential to commercial zoning about twenty years ago. The rezoning has created a potential for serious safety problems. The intersection of Village Lane and Youngs Road is already dangerous due to the visual obstacles of the buttonwood tree and the war monument which divide the exits of the lanes on to Route 48, and the fact that the exits of the lanes are separated by some yards. Because of the proximity of the intersection to the school, and the fact that schoolchildren cross the intersection on foot, great care should be exercised in the determination of the use of the property in question. There is already considerable danger due to the cars and trucks speeding to the Cross Sound Ferry, which frequently pass illegally on the outside lanes when motorists are attempting to turn into either lane. Any usage which creates frequent pull -ins and pull-outs, or casual parking on the road which would block visibility, would substantially increase the danger both to drivers and pedestrians. We urge you to consider rezoning this property back to its original and more appropriate residential zone. We realize that this is not easy to do, but perhaps negotiations with the owner could result in a solution that would satisfy him and protect the citizens of Orient. Sincerely, Freddie achsberger Southold Citizens for Safe Roads P6 PO Box 25 • Greenport, NY 11944 - 631-477.0444 - Email: saferoads@optonline.net SOUT,LD CITIZENS FOR SAE ROADS � W PB SOUTHOLD TOWN -A Destination ^- Not A Corridor Su.br_ PS May 27, 2005 Jeri Woodhouse, Chairman Members of the Southold Town Planning Board Re: Ehrlich Application, Village Lane and Rte 48, Orient Dear Jeri, In considering this application, we urge you to take seriously the safety issues it presents. The intersection of Village Lane and Youngs Road with Rte. 48 is characterized by visual impediments —the buttonwood tree and the soldiers' monument —bisecting the exits of the lanes onto Route 48, and by the fact that the lanes enter Route 48 several yards apart. It must be remembered that schoolchildren cross these corners fiNuently, as do bikers and walkers in summer, and that the comer is made particularly dangerous by speeding cars and trucks that pass on the outside when drivers are attempting to make turns into either lane. As you are aware, this property has never been used as anything except a residential home, and was arbitrarily rezoned about twenty years ago. It is our opinion that the rezoning was a serious error, and we are urging the Town Board to change it back to residential zoning. We believe that it is essential, if commercial usage should be permitted, that it be only for offices that would not entail parking for more than one or two cars at a time and would avoid frequent pull -ins and pull-outs and roadside parking. Sincerely, TI�Z Freddie Wachsberger Southold Citizens for Safe Roads F' Cc: Josh Horton, Supervisor AY 3 1 2005 PO Box 25 • Greenport, NY 11944 • 631-477-0444 • Email: saferoads@optonline.net July 6, 2005 «Title» cFirstName» cLastName» cAddress1» «Address2v ((City)), «State» cPostalCode» Dear «Title» cLastName»: Re: Proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich Village Lane & Route 48, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-18-5-5 Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed site plan for Robert Ehrlich The Planning Board has received the application and will be assessing all of the relevant site plan issues and providing a response to the applicant. At the same time, the site plan has been referred to the jurisdictional agencies listed on the attached page for their review. At such time as an application has received all necessary environmental reviews and approvals, the Planning Board shall schedule a public hearing. Notice will be given as required by the Town Code. All interested parties may attend the hearing and offer their comments to the Planning Board. The site plan file may be examined in the office of the Planning Board office at the above address by filing under the Freedom of Information Law. Thank you for your interest in this important community matter. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson Title FirstName LastName Addressl Address2 City State PostalCode Ms. Freddie Wachsberger Southold P.O. Box Greenport NY 11944 Citizens 25 for Safe Roads Mr. Tony Just 195 Orient NY 11957 Village Lane Ms. Anne Hopkins 380 Platt P.O. Box Orient NY 11957 Road 82 Mr. Clyde Wachsberger 3180 Orient NY 11957 Orchard Street Mr. Douglas Constant P.O. Box Orient NY 11957 225 Mr. Edward Webb 420 Box 194 Orient NY 11957 & Village Mrs. Lane Mr. Edmond Papantonio 55 Orient NY 11957 & Village Mrs. Lane Mr. Edwin Blesch, Jr. 45 P.O. Box Orient NY 11957-0430 Youngs 430 Road M osr- SOUTHOLD CITIZENS FOR SAE ROADS SOUTHOLD TOWN —A Destination -- Not A Corridor May 26,2005 Mark Wolfgang Supervisor of Traffic and Engineering Safety NYSDOT I �' ►J 250 Veterans' Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N.Y. 11788 Dear Mr. Wofgang, Mr. Robert Ehrlich has requested a curb cut on his property at the corner of Village Lane and Route 48 in Orient. In our experience, that is a dangerous corner and the danger would be significantly increased by an additional curb cut. The property in question has never been other than a residential property and the zone change from residential to commercial when the zoning code was rewritten was, in our opinion, a serious error. The intersection is close to the school and traversed by schoolchildren on foot. It is made dangerous by the visual impediments of a war monument bisecting the head of Village Lane and a large tree bisecting the foot of Youngs Road, and by the fact that the Lane and Road enter Rte. 48 several yards apart. The danger is infinitely exacerbated by the cars and trucks which race to the Cross Sound Ferry, frequently passing on the outside when another car is attempting to turn. We urge you to take these concerns into consideration when you address the curb cut. We also request that you place "No Parking" signs on the south side of Rte.48 west of the intersection, to avoid overflow parking which would impede the visibility of drivers exiting Village Lane. Sincerely, Freddie Wachsberger Vice President. Cc: Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Jeri Woodhouse, Chairman, Southold Town Planning Bo r-d MAY 7 , 2005 PO Box 25 • Greenport, NY 11944 • 631-477-0444 • Email: saferoads@optonline.net Mark Wolfgang Supervisor of Traffic Engineering and Safety New York State Department of Transportation 250 Veterans' Memorial Highway Hauppague, New York 11788 E Sunday, April 24, 2005 Clyde Wachsberger BOX 307 Orient, New York 1195y Dear Mr. Wolfgang, I am concerned about a proposed curb cut for the property belonging to Mr. Robert Ehrlich in Orient, New York, at the intersection of Main Road (Route 25) and Village lane. The property is in the Orient Historic District and has been a residence for all of its ioo+ years. During that time the driveway was used only by residents. Currently there is a proposal before the Southold Town Planning Board, filed by the new owner, to open a commercial business on the site. This site occupies the southwest corner of the intersection of Main Road (Route 25) and Village Lane to the south and Youngs Road to the north. The entrance to Village Lane is a Y around a monument to the local Civil War soldiers. The entrance to Youngs Road is around a massive ancient tree that has stood in the middle of this road since the Declaration of Independence was signed. Both of these landmarks block sight lines entering on to the Main Road from Village Lane and from Youngs Road. All four houses (including the one proposed for a commercial business) on the intersection are private residences. The two to the north have their driveway access on to Youngs Road. Of the two on the south, the Ehrlich property, now proposed for a commercial business, has a driveway opening onto Main Road (Route 25) and the other residence has driveway access to Village Lane. Traffic coming from the Cross Sound Ferry in Orient Point travels westward every hour until about io PM. This makes egress from Village Lane and from Youngs Road problematical. If there is additional commercial traffic exiting and entering a driveway on Main Road on the west side of the intersection, the problem and the danger will increase substantially. This property has always been a residence. The lot was given a Commercial Zoning by accident by the Southold Town Board and this was never rectified. However, it was never a problem before as all previous owners have used the house as a residence. Now that a commercial business is proposed for the site, the issue of dangerous traffic becomes extremely urgent. 0 Traffic traveling east towards Orient Point and the Cross Sound Ferry tends not to slow down to the 40 mph speed limit from the 55 mph speed limit on the East Marion — Orient Causeway, just west of the property, even though the speed limit is reduced further to go mph just east of the intersection where the Main Road passes the Oysterponds Elementary School. Cars exiting from the driveway onto Main Road (Route 25) will create an additional danger here. This is a residential area with many summer homes. Jogging, bicycling, and walking are popular activities. The beach at the end of Youngs Road draws walkers, bikers, rollerskaters, and cars from Village Lane. During school term, elementary school children walk to the Oysterponds School and cross at this intersection. As ferry traffic continues to increase, it is already dangerous to cross the Main Road from Village Lane to Youngs Road. Additional commercial traffic exiting and entering a driveway just west of the intersection will make it even more dangerous. I urge you to take into consideration the very special nature of this site before you approve any curb cut for this property. Thank you. ,1 Sincerely, 4de achsberger � • �� 2 5, zoos AFR 2 Fa V,S, zt6 a of — 01 Cl C4 -�U j 1,t+o.,2e„� Leo �-,tA.�,�;,oi.* �d-Oti2+�?.r�r•.Z —[ � ,�o'.., YG�y+vr�'i3�vC.�6.( —4v 40 -&( QLJ vwiu c�.aiiv C Zn�e/j�vc a r�-�.d1 �' C` ��5�-0"-•cam( .-g-p-q �/n�-�sw�� 07� I �U r o err // 7 6 2 Fo 86X s +0 S,jtts 0 Anne S. Hopkins 380 Platt Road1P.0.90x Orient, NY 11957 631 323.2527 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse, Chair Southold Town Planning Board I Southold Town Nall b 53o95 Main Road. Southold, NY 11971 Ref: Ehrlich property on Village Lane, Orient Dear Jeri and Members of the Town Board, 6 82 April 18, 2005 _5-�5 0 1 g i005 Fax, 631 765-3136 Like many other Orient residents I believe that the house owned by Robert Ehrlich at the head of Village Lane is completely unsuited for any retail use, for all the reasons ouriined by these other residents. This is a dangerous intersection and any use of that house that increases traffic and changes the residential nature of that section of Village Lane is inappropriate. My primary purpose in writing, however, is to suggest that Rooert Ehrlich's conduct in connection with his Orient prop" and also in connection with his commercial operation. in Sea Cliff indicate that if he is successful with this application he will go on to expand his operation with or without offical sanction. He obtained a liquor license under false pretenses and made alterations to the property without the necessary local authorizations. According to sources in Sea Cliff, what started as a coffee shop there expanded to serve everything from muffins to hot dogs, with outside tables, benches and umbrellas, which he had agreed to give up in order to stay open until 10:30 p.m. He also added five music and a game room, so that the place became a popular "hang out'. What is to stop this from happening on Orients Village Lane? I urge you to act with extreme caution in dealing with Mr. Ehrlich and his application Sincerely, �t�� tf1$ 11 9 suer Monday, April 18, 2005 Orient Dear Members of the Planning Board, Regarding the application for a Commercial Certificate Cf Occupancy f or the property owned by Mr. Ehrlich in Orient on the corner of Village Lane and Main Road„ I urge you to carefully consider the ramifications of such a dramatic change. This property has always been a residence. It is on the southwest corner of the entrance into Village Lane, and the other three corner properties are all residences. Village Lane is residential as far down as the Country Store, and then there are only the Post Office, the Iee Cream Parlor, the Linea Store, a ad the Farm Store. These are each quiet and low -traffic businesses. Then the residences continue on down to King street. You are all familiar with the unique nature of Orient, as a home for its residents and as a tourist stop for visitors not just from far away, but from nearby towns as well. It is one of the few almost -perfectly -preserved eighteenth and nineteenth century villages, and therein lies its appeal. Any business on this site other than a professional service such as doctors' or lawyers' offices with 9 — 5 business hours, or a bed -and -breakfast with one or two rooms, would engender tremendous traffic at an already dangerous corner, where ferry traffic, usually speeding above the speed limit, competes with residents entering and leaving Village Lane and Youngs Road. Mr. Ehrlic:h's original proposal was for a Coffee Shop with outdoor tables and live and taped music, open from early morning until 10:30 PP/I. This would have forever changed the nature Hof Orient; not just. because of traffic, parting, and crowds, but because of noise from morning until night. More importantly, he apparently applied for (and was granted) a liquor license without having a Commercial Certificate Of Occupancy. This was just one of many disturbing practices that brought his plans to the attention of neigbbors and the Town Offices. Fortunately the Health Department blocked his CeAticate Of Occupancy for a business that serves food or drink, based on his septic system. The availability of parking spaces also figured in to the blocking of a C of O. Now we understand he is applying for a C of O to open a retail business. While that may seem to be a type of business that would', not engender serious traffic and create a noisy, crowded atmosphere, it is important to understand flat Mr. Ehrlich opened a coffee shop in Seacliff that has become an albatross to the neighbors and the various Town Offices. Apparently he agreed to numerous compromises but did not honor his agreements. For example, it seems he agreed to not stay open until 10:3o at night in exchange for having tables and chairs 41 0 outside, and then proceeded to continue his late -night business. It appears he is re -applying for his liquor license there as well. It looks as if he is not trustworthy as far as negotiated agreements, written or verbal. I believe that if he is allowed to open any business at all, it will soon turn into another neighbor -vs. -business -vs. -Town mess like the Blue Dolphin motel r.nd its noise -.related problems. Don't let this happen on your watch! Sincerely, Clyde'Wachsberger Orient.r New York ak- Douglas Constant, A.A.A. Antiques & Appraisals April 18, 2005 To Mrs. Jeri Woodhouse and Members of the Planning Board, The Ehrlich property at the corner of Village Lane and the Main Road should never have been up -zoned to commercial in the 1980's. G. Ritchie Latham, until recently a member of your board, told me it was a mistake and never should have happened. Despite the zone change Mr. Knispel, the then owner of the property, continued to dwell in the home. He sold the house to Jonathan Mudd who restored the residence and lived there with his family until he relocated to the South and sold his home to Mr. Ehrlich. Mr. Ehrlich's plans have morphed one into another like three card monte. First a bike shop, then a coffee shop, then one with live music (until IOPM!), and even a claim that the building had a commercial CO so that he could obtain a liquor license for the property. A garage was demolished without a permit, illegal apartments were added and subtracted, half of an interior floor removed, commercial electrical service added along with appliances. Mature, healthy trees removed along with landscaping to give the appearance of more space for cars and trucks and the side and back yard (including a bit of my property) was denuded of anything green and roughly paved. Mr. Ehrlich's heart clearly lies in retailing and success in retail relies on traffic. Traffic is a problem at that location. Some of you were on the field trip to meet with Mr. Ehrlich a few years ago. I heard you tell him that it was a dangerous spot — I heard you tell him that he did not have enough parking — I heard you tell him that the entrance to his property was too close to Village Lane. It was after that meeting that Mr. Ehrlich went ahead with the changes to his building. Are you starting to get the picture here? When the Master Plan was implemented in the 80's there were no casinos in Connecticut, no high speed ferries, only one large ferry in the fleet. The traffic isn't going to improve any time soon. No one could have predicted what would happen to the corridor through Orient but we should be able to imagine more clearly now. This house doesn't have a commercial CO and it should not receive one. The property should be re -zoned. The Stake Holders findings should be respected. We in Orient want to keep our "Business District" where it is. We do not want more businesses on Route 25. This home is at the beginning of the last intact collection of historic homes in the Town of Southold. Please help us to protect our community and reject as unsafe and inappropriate a retail business at this corner. Since ly G�9:���1� ug onstant Post Office Box 225 Orient New York 11957 631.323.2646 fax 631.323.1456 cell 631.650.2897 email des@peseaisae4 Certified Member Appraisers Association of America 0Ir. and Mrs. Edward W. Web 420 Village Lane Box 194 Orient, NY 11957 April 4", 2005 Planning Board Town of Southold Southold, NY Re: Ehrlich property, Orient Dear Members, The Ehrlich home sits at the head of Village Lane, the acknowledged entrance to the historic hamlet of Orient. The house on this property has always been a home in the hamlet, occupied, until purchase by its current owner, by families throughout its long existence. That it might be considered for any use other than a home, would be a step back in Southold town' efforts to preserve our unique history for present and future generations. We know the property has been zoned for light business. Clearly, that was a mistake! The Planning Board now has an opportunity to speak as a single voice in opposition to the proposed usage. There are many reasons to oppose this site for commercial use. Among them, the above mentioned entrance to a historic hamlet, the incursion of an uncontrolled commercial operation, (today a 600 square foot retail shop, tomorrow a (fill in the blank), closeness to a local house of worship and a public school, creation of a dangerous additional intersection with egress onto a busy highway, and potential disruption of the peace and quiet the immediate neighborhood has enjoyed for hundreds of years. The most appropriate use, therefore, would be for this property to continue as a single family dwelling. However, we do not believe the community would oppose a commercial use that would protect the immediate neighborhood, retaining the characteristics for which the property was intended. Examples of acceptable use might include a physician's or other professional office. A retail operation, with little or no control over that definition, is not appropriate. Thank you for your attention to our concern. Sincerely, L� l� and Mrs. Edward W. Webb Anne and liduiwid PaTNUACynio 55 Village lane Oriente, New Vork 11957 fi31 7&i S136 Muming Board Town of Southold Atuh: Jeri WUo(jlluuSC, Ghairpcnon RQ-Ehrlich PromrLv_ Orient. Dear Ms. Woodhouse. Aptil �ti, ltlb We would like Lo voice our support for tic positions LAM by Edwin lBlesch in his letter to the Planning Board (April •I, 2005, please see auaclu(l), resjiccting a propo�ul for dhc Llu'lich properly at Village Lane and Main Road In Orient. hi addition w die siyntilicant cony rns W. Blesclt raises, we are extremely troubled about (1) gaEt!, at huh already rringriied and clant.'emus intersection and (2) t>reservuts 4 'roil characler of Orient as it is now. The I11r1ich properly is across the su'eeL Thom a church and down die block from a school. Yours- Lruly, 4--e { g�i Amble d blmond Papantonio page of 2 L0/T0 39t1d ❑TN1NV8Vdh ,_9-.bKr-,T6t 09!7 5La07, Y L 7, IN Planning Board C/O Jeri Woodhouse Southold Town April 4, 2005 Edwin J. Biesch Jr. 45 Youngs Road P.O. Box 430 Orient, N.Y. 11957-0430 �g.5- 5 Re. Ehrlich Property It was with dismay that I read in last Thursday's Suffolk Times that you are meeting today to decide the proposal of a "gift shop/retail store" at the corner of Village Lane and Main Road, Orient. You have not solicited reactions or input from the surrounding neighbors who would be most effected. And you have left no time for us to reply properly. As you know, strong reactions were registered against Mr. Ehrlich's first proposal. Apparently irregularities and dissembling in that process resulted in its failure. This makes us particularly suspect of a new proposal rushed through without community assessment. A group of about five owners of neighboring properties met with Ed Forrester of Code Enforcement and Mike Verity of the Building Department. We were assured that Mr. Ehrlich could not get a Certificate of Occupancy for a single family dwelling without substantially altering "renovations" that had already been done. Also questioned was the industrial equipment in what seems a restaurant kitchen. To my knowledge nothing has changed in the configuration of the property. And there is an electrical feed to the property installed at Mr. Ehrlich's request and cost, which the LIPA linesman told me could power a small factory. Why would any of this be necessary for a single family or a small shop? "Retail store" is far too big and loose a term; it is an umbrella under which we could expect anything from a bike shop to a video rental. Allowing any business to open there without first assuring that all permits and legal requirements have been met would be a mistake akin to the Town's original mistake of zoning it business in a residential area. To permit a presumably acceptable tenant to use 600 square feet sets a precedent which opens the way to future tenants who may not be so acceptable. I don't think that allowing occupancy just because he has a potential letter is enough evidence of good faith in meeting the codes of the Town of Southold or the wishes of the people of Orient. Yours truly, ���v✓v✓/: ��J �'�yG/�. 1. . LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Rejected Project Type: Site Plans Status: Application SCTM # : 1000 - 18.-5-5 Project Name: Ehrlich, Robert Address: 2254 NYS Road 25 Hamlet: Orient Applicant Name: Robert Ehrlich Owner Name: Robert Ehrlich Zone 1: B Approval Date: fP� OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date Zone 2: Zone I Location: s/w corner of NYS Road 25 and Village Lane SC Filing Date: C and R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED viv 1 SCAN Date: 8 6 5 4 I 3 2 C O TEST HOLE MES NALD GEOSCIENCE 6-13-02 EL=20 I SITE PLAN KEY DW. - DRYWELL LP - LEACHING POOL ST - SEPTIC TANK EP - EXPANSION POOL VIEW B VIEW A CONTINUOUS RAILING VIEW( A 1-�" DIAMETER SECTION A -A 12n 12 1 l 3 3 " " (REF) CONCRETE RAMP CONCRETE DING LANPORCH MISTING LANDING 1:12 SLOPE MAX. FLUSH WITH EX WOOD PORCH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMP ELEVATION VIEW RAILING Z" CONCRETE RAMP AND LANDING o WITH 6" MIN THK WITH 6' 6 WWF AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 6' CONCRETE GRASS q GRASS CONTINUOUS RAILING x ¢ N RAM ¢ 4' Of SECTION A -A RAMP CROSS SECTION CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK q% RAILIN VIE' s THK WITH WIRE FABRIC HANDICAP RAMP PLAN VIE EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 8' CONCRETE WALKWAY CROSS SECTION HANDICAP WALK/RAMP DETAILS r RAMP AND WALKWAY IN CONFORMANCE WI FH ICC/ANSI A-117,1-1998 A istoric NO SCALE 0-66% BASE ➢IA H Tree Planted by early 17 ncrete urb settlers1 3-3 DOME SECTION a in R C�41-61 -DOME (TW) - SJ8.74 MIN m=tfls• 41 61 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 610 0000a 000 o0 ooa oo eoo 0 00 0 00 0 24 TYP. k34 16 MIN 16 MI DOME SPACING DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD DETAILS MonUI'perlt DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN MM FRONTto LocalENTRANCEi HIGH PH c?" SEo ,GSsl 9Q`JF. tT HE GE U) L veterans ]/4" LXPANSION JOINT N PLAN USE WALKWAY xL Q /� o ` 1. THIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES Y L�D 3 J o ENTRANCE SIGN POSTED AS SHOWN 2. THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SLIP RESISTANT TEXTURE. A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE. aP PZ CD U � � 3. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER m o O �� 4. THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE PARKIING COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION m 5 1" REVEAL REQUIRED (� 71ME 4- 6. DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS INSTALLED AS SHOWN GLUE SPROOE . RIITEM LIST FOR N.Y.S.D.O.T. REQ, MUTCD CODE 37-1 NO PARKING SIGN INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ITEM N0. DESCRIPTION SIGN DIMENSIONS 12"X18" r* INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCO CODE SECTION 213-39 10608.0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - UNREINFORCED 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS - CLASS F FYIqTINQ < ': ***� DRIVEWAY �O SCORE MARK FULL HEIGHT CURB 7" 4' SIDEWALK i/4" FL - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - 1 � -- WIRE (7J "1N�.r+r - DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION J Cwn�'a,e.rrxq lJ K04.0.91t py to DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A �\ Y scA6E: IN T s I by STORE SIGN DETAILS NOTES: SIGN LOCATED BETWEEN SECOND FLOOR FRONT WINDOWS 1. DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS. WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT REQUIRED & 'DIRT" DRIVEWAYS NOT SPECIFIED THE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" OF ITEM 60B 0201 AND CONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES 16 1 a 2. THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY 16_1_1z SHALL BE 6" THICK, WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED (ITEM 10608,0103) AS SHOWN IN SEC SITE PLAN SCALE: 1120' SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 KEY MAP SCALE 1"=200' eslsling p=v't BASE Item 402.378901M & Item 402.3789011M SUBBASE Item 17304.1011 EM 10403.0903 (FULL DEPTH) DETAIL MEETING EXIST ASPHALT PAV'T (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10403.0903 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT / CONCRETE BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE A�FA USA srRHn`EAIRS TOTAL 18TFLOOR 132 572 221 WIS 2ND FLOOR 432 NONE 156 597 ATTIC 377 NONE 30 40l TOTAL SPACE B11 02 416 1YlG NOTES: 1. BASEMENT 15 UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH 5'-9" AND 6'-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. ITEM 10608.0103 CONCRETE CURB PE A ITEM 10609 2801 N.T.S. NOTE THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING EXISTING CURB SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN THE LAST 10 FEET AT LOCATIONS FACING TRAFFIC, SHOULDER WORK AREA ONES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS LIDAYS. NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE TED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE INSPECTOR, TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS dIPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHOULDER WORK AREA IRDING TO FIGURE 302.9 OF THE N,Y.S.D.O.T. JAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SCALE: N.T S. NOTES. 1. SEE SECTIONS 234.10, 238.1, 238.4, 238.7, 254.2, 301 2, AND SUBCHAPTER G 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301.12 LEGEND r FLAGGER OFLAG TREE ® WORK AREA CONE L Ir C1 'o N NOTES: APPROVED SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH REF# C10-02-0016 APPROVED NEW YORK STATE O.O.T, PERMIT # 1045-0458 TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S.F. OR 0.28 ACRES PARKING AREA = 3846 S.F. OR 32% LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING AREA 6971, S.F. OR 57Y LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR 11X COVERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUISNESS DISTRICT) PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1314 FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE ISOW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIGHT IN PARKING AREA ONLY, LOCATED AS SHOWN. OPERATED DURING STORE HOURS ONLY. TRUCK DELIVERIES TO BE SCHEDULED BEFORE OR AFTER STORE OPEN HOURS HULK PARKING CALCULATIONS - USE AREA # SPACES REWD PER CODE SPACES PROVIDED( SALES AREA 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 250 S.F, SALES AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ TOW S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS END ROAD WORK 500'f NO SHOULDER soD'f srlouLDER WORK DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: V=ARC ROOF V=1327 X 0.13 X 1 = 226 C.F. 226/42.24 FOR B' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. DRYWELL STONE PARKING AREA V = 3846 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 392 C.F. CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK V=572X0.17X1=98 C.F. TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE 392 C.F.. 98 C.F. = 490 C.F. V = 490/42.24 FOR 8' DIA RINGS = 12' REQUIRED 8' DIA TOTAL DEPTH = 12' TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 18' PROVIDE 3 - B' DIA. X 5' DEEP AND 1-8' DIA. X 3' DEEP ORYWELLS ORYWELLS #1, #2 AND #3 SHALL BE 5' DEEP DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP---- , PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS,u�(,�...- 2 6" RCA SUBASE I' - LS LS 11 LSy, 2" STONE HANDICAP PARKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN 1 FEB 1 �QQfi HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 4ie LANDSCAPE BUFFER HEDGE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE 5-6' HIGH LEYLAND CYPRESS DOUBLE ROW STAGARED SPACING AT 2.5' APART GROWTH RATE 12-18" PER YEAR SITE PLAN PREPARED 2-2-2006 SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 OWNER: ROBERT EHRLICH P.O. BOX 326 SEACLIFF, N.Y, 11579 Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA -PATH RIVERHEAD9 N.Y 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: ART, ANTIQUE, AUCTION GALLERY SITE PLAN SD 1000-18-5-5 SITE E. DRAWING NUMBER DATE: 2-2-2006 SCALE: I"=20' SNEET I OF 1 L� C 1 J /1 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 7 DI i , AI FIRST FLOOR PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 925 SOFT 3 COMPARTMENT SINK TO BE REMOVED SECOr TOTAI STORAGE 41 SOFT OP FL❑ Ic SINK ❑ JANITORS CLOSET 0 —3 STAIRS 30 SOFT TH9LWAY SOFT STORAGE II 20 sQFT SALES AREA 572 SOFT COUNTER 2'-6" STOVE fx SINK w T❑ BE REMOVE r z O O _2. O O To HANDICAP BATH 67 SOFT ❑ STORAGE AREA ❑ 5'-11" 71 SOFT DUAL COMPARTMENT REFRIC, S/S SINK TO REMAI PORCH 3'=3' PORCH BASEMENT PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 528 SOFT CRAWLSPACE ATTIC FLOOR PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 407 SOFT BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGESALES AREA AREA ATH HSTAIRS STAIRS TOTAL 1STFLOOR 132 572 221 925 2ND FLOOR 432 NONE 165 597 ATTIC 377 NONE 30 407 TOTAL SPACE 941 572 416 1929 NOTES: 1. BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH 5'-9" AND 6'-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. 3. STOVE AND SINKS TO BE REMOVED AS NOTED 0 IC M Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH r RIVERHEAD, MY 11901 A PHONE 369-2170 N TITLE: ART, ANTIQUE, AUCTION GALLERY FLOOR PLANS {� D 1000-18-5-5 FLRPLN c- DMA G� DATE: 2-3-06 1/4"=1' 1 1 9 1 OF 1 n rr 4 3 i I u 7 7 y y a 5 4 4 I Y NOTES. 1. TYPICAL DELIVERY TRUCK DIMENSIONS 24' LONG X 7.1' WIDE WITH 176" WHEELBASE 2. LAYOUT BASED ON 31.8' TURNING RADIUS 3. NUMBERING AND COLOR CODE SHOW TRUCK TURNING AROUND WITH A FIVE POINT TURN AT EACH POINT WHERE THE TRUCK STOPS TO EITHER GO FORWARD OR REVERSE. Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, MY 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: ART, ANTIQUE, AUCTION GALLERY TRUCK TURN AROUND LAYOUT a R'D TRUCK TURN AROUND REC,V DRAWING NUMBER DATE 2-3-2006 scA�e: 1-16' sxeer 1 ur j 3 2 E:3 DI W I a 7 N S SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 SITE PLAN KEY ST - SEPTIC TANK LP - LEACHING POOL EP - EXPANSION POOL CS - EXISTING CESSPOOL DW - DRYWELL/STORM DRAIN SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "=40' 0 5 E 3 NOTES: 1. FINAL GRADE IN SEPTIC AREA TO BE SAME AS EXISTING 2. EXISTING CESSPOOL SHOWN TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WELL TO BE ABANDONED 3. INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH SCHDS STANDARDS 4. STORM DRAINS LOCATED AS SHOWN 6. TRAFFIC COVERS TO BE USED ON ALL SEPTIC COMPONENTS 7. SEPTIC TANK AND LEACHING POOL SHALL BE INSTALLED PROVIDING A MINIMUM 10 FOOT CLEARANCE TO BUILDING 8. WELLS A14D SEPTIC SYETEMS ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES LOCATED BY OTHERS 9. NEW LEACHING POOL LOCATION MAXIMIZES DISTANCE TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES EXISTING WELLS WATER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS 1. PUMP-IIIP STA-RITE-RED JACKET SERIES 20 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP MINIMUM CAPACITY AT 20 PSI IS 5 GPM. PUMP PRESSURE S WTTCH :SETTINGS 60140 PSIG 2.82 GALLON CAPTIVE AIR TANK INSTALLED INBASEMENT 3. WELL SCREEN STAINLESS STEEL 5" DIAMETER 4' LENGTH NAGAOKA. WELL INSTALLED TO DEPTH OF 50 FEET TOTAL CASING I" DIAMETER PVC NSF AND ASTM RATED WITH PITLESS ADAPTER 4. WATERJ'IGHT SANITARY SEAL INSTALLED ONPITLESS UNIT ISo ABOVE GRADE 5 WELL LATERAL 1-1/4"HIGH DENSITY PLASTIC ASTMRATED 160PSI Test Hole Dug by MINIMUM AND NSF APPROVED FOR POTABLE WATER. DEPTH Mcdonnel Geoscience SHALL BE 54" MINIMUM ALONG ENTIRE LENGTH 06-13-02 TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB\ INLET MIN, 4- ➢IA CLAYS 2400 PIPE OR EQUIVALENT PITCHED 1/4'/FT, BASEMENT f7171F9ai.7 B2 GALLON STORAGE GROUND WATER_ CAST IRON COVERS TO GRADE 1' IMIN 0 1' EL 20.1 FINISHED GRADE dark brawn nay loam 0' OL ', �rown .. y ML 3.5' brawn B. an. It. OUTLET Coon. MIN. 4' ➢IA, wand SW CLASS 2400 PIPE with with OR EQUIVALENT PITCHED 1/8'/FT. T. heavy gravel . I -- --, 9. CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK 1500 Gallon TYPICAL WELL not to scale EXISTING GRADE EL-20.1 ' INV=18.2 SEPTIC TANK 1500 GALLON Dal. SW brown on. 1. m.dlum wand 17' 5% SLOPE MAX TEST HOLE DATA SANITARY INVERTS Et-19.0 INV-17.7 INV=17,5 WAITER SUPPLY CALCULATIONS [SCREEN SUBMERSIBLE REQUIRED WELL YIELD 300/144=2.08 GPM PUMP 5 GALLONS PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 5 GPM PER MINUTE MIN EXISTING WELL LATERAL I" PROVIDES 10 GPM PRESSURE SWITCH SET TO CYCLE AT 60140 PSIG REQUIRED STORAGE TANK 2.08 X 10= 20.8 GALLONS PROVIDE A 82 GALLON STORAGE TANK 2 11 SANITARY SYSTEM CALCULATIONS SITE DATA: SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP # 1000-18-5-5 SITE AREA 0.28 ACRES PROPOSED SEPTIC SYSTEM UPGRADE FOR A DRY RETAIL STORE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT: ZONE IV ALLOWABLE FLOW: 300 GPD/ACRE CALCULATED ALLOWABLE FOR SITE (0.28 ACRES) (300 GPD/ACRE) = 84 GPD TOTAL BUILDING OCCUPIED SPACE AREA 1992 SQFT USE SANITARY TOTAL DRY RETAIL 1ST FLOOOR 882 SQFT X .03 GPD/SQFT 27 GPD STORAGE 2l'1D FLOOR 606 SQFT X .04 GPD/SQFT 25 GPD BASEMENT (STORAGE) 504 SQFT X .04 GPD/SQFT 20 GPD TOTAL SANITARY FLOW FOR SYSTEM..........................................72 GPI TOTAL SITE SANITARY FLOW (AGAINST DENSITY) : 72 GPD SEPTIC TANK: REQUIRED: 65 GPD x 2......................................................... = 130 GPD PROVIDE: 8'DIA X 5' LIQ. DEPTH1500 GALLON CYLINDRICAL.-.= 1000GPD LEACHING POOLS: REQUIRED: 300/1.5 GPD/SF..................................................... = 200 S.F. PROVIDE: 1-8' DIA.X 13' LEACHING POOL WITH IT EFF. DEPTH.. = 314 S.F. nxmwn r sees! nix¢ ARD OVER TO r+.� ore¢ 1' IN. r rna ..wq wev -24 2' AX. P ri, UiY INLET MIN 4' DIA.' 0 PITCHED 1/e'/FT. PITCHED 1/8'/FT. '4,i• �' M F��F 25, MAX 12'EF CTIVEH 0.Rt +DEPT, 'MIN F y,;;y f', 2 R. I 1B11 GRDUNDVpTER AM%i W •. • •• EIWEUNSUITABLE 10 MK Y .'^•. •'. `A3211U.MEDU CU COLLM. MCYFrLL IMIFIUN. TD IE CiF.111 .' AVI .xx AND ERAVFl IEIaIRATaN q A NI.DDi wrATA SA ff SI+a IIa ER4VCL r.+ TYPICAL LEACHING POOL LEACHING POOL 8' DIA X SP' EFF DEPTH M C m r� td'w; X I - zoo; Suffolk County Health Department L U N EI=18.7 Approved in accordance with Hoard of R...e.v ' detFrminanon dated O ti SUBJECT TO COVENANTS & RESTRICTRONG LIBERR PAOE EL=5.1 r, 'PFpp 07050114R RO�'EsslG�a Suffolk County Department of Health Services Approval for Construction -Other Than Single Family Reference o.e/D- 66 /JDesign Flow.J� elel--LS�GP- Th- These plane h been reviewed for genera] confe once with 9u olk County Department of Health Services standards, relating to water supply and sewage disposal. Regardless of any omissions, inconsistencies or lack of detail, construction is required to he in accordance with the attached permit conditions and applicable standards, unless specifically waived by the Department. This approval expires 3 years from the approv d ' , Mies 2 it or ren e . 5EP 2 0 2005 Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, N.Y 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: DRY RETAIL STORE SITE PLAN / PROPOSED SEPTIC SYS. BD 1000-18-5-5 SEPTIC REV. DRAWAIGNIIMBP,R F DATE:3-30-OS SCALE: 1"=40' I I SEWHr 1 OF 1 U rn °z Q A 8 7 6 5 4 1 3 2 March 6, 2006 To the Editor: What is the responsibility of Town Government for correcting a problem caused by Town Government? This question should be addressed at the public Planning Board meeting next Monday, which will consider an application for an antiques/craft/auction gallery at the comer of Village Lane and Route 48 in Orient. This property, which is at the entrance to the National Historic District and has always been a residence, was arbitrarily rezoned "Business" about 20 years ago, despite the fact that it couldn't support: Business Zone requirements, such as a 25' buffer between the parking lot and adjoining residences. It was also on an already dangerous corner, which has become much more dangerous because of the sometimes reckless ferry traffic passing on the right or crossing the yellow line. We are very concerned that casual roadside parking invited by this type of retail establishment, on a site; with limited parking and road frontage, could create serious obstacles to visibility on an intersection already partially impeded by historic monuments bisecting the streets. The intersection is crossed by schoolchildren on foot and on bicycle, and accesses the Post Office to the south and the public beach to the north. It has already been the site of several accidents. We are asking the present Town government to correct the Town's earlier error and return this property to its original, appropriate "Residential" zone. By the same token, we applaud the Town Board's suit to roll back Cross Sound Ferry traffic to 1995 levels. The lack of will on the part of previous Town Governments to enforce Town zoning regulations and State environmental regulations has permitted uncontrolled expansion, which cannot continue. Establishing firm, realistic limits at Orient Point will, one hopes, force the opening of additional ferry terminals closer to the origin of the traffic; there is no way the huge potential expansion of casino and vehicle traffic can continue to squeeze into our historic road. Positive Town action confronting this reality was long overdue. Sincerely, Freddie Wachsberger Southold Citizens for Safe Roads Terry, Mark From: Troy Gustayson ]tgustav@optonline.net] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 10:39 AM To: Jeri Woodhouse Subject: Ehrlich property Dear Jeri: Please consider this an official communication with you as chair of the Planning Board. As you know, Joan and I were involved in a serious accident earlier this week at the intersection of Village Lane and the Main Road. Our vehicle was side -swiped by a drunk driver (at least he's been charged with DWI) as we were preparing to turn into Village Lane from the eastbound lane of the Main Road -- in other words, right in front of the Ehrlich property. We might have avoided the crash, but the shoulder of the roadway was too narrow to allow us to pull our car entirely off the roadway. As you know, this is a very busy intersection, andwe are concerned that additional accidents will occur there if the Ehrlich property is used for commercial purposes. In our opinion, this property never should have been rezoned commercial, and we sincerely hope the Planning Board will not approve any plan that will exacerbate this problem. Thank you for considering out point of view. :Troy Gustayson (on behalf of myself and Joan) You had suggested findiing out what was new with Ehrlich and his project in Sea cliff. Karl Christ owns the house caddy -corner from the Orient property. As an aside what do you think of the "Orient Gift Shop" sign. You know the Town requires signage to be as low to the ground as practible.Can you imagine that graphic as a welcome to Southolds' only real historic district? I read what was sent last night -I'm not sure what it all means. I am comforted that there is sympathy against this project by various and sundry folks at Town Hall. I will not share that e-mail or even tell anyone about it. Where does the email leave us? What is a SEQUA II ? Karin and I will be in Chevy Chase, MD delivering stuff we sold at the Annapolis Show. What will I be missing? Karin got home from visiting her Mom in FL last night and I showed her how Ehrlichs' fence will not allow us to maintain the siding on 2 sides. Reading the documents and articles about Sea Cliff ought to and is meant to scare the heck out of anyone getting in the way of this ruthless guy. Giving in to him literally writes a script for anyone wahoo in the future who wants to do anything business -wise in Southold. Pat Moore is getting a real education in how to drive square pegs into round holes. Watch what happens to the site at the corner is he gets a green light. Why all this for a 582 sq.ft. 'crafts shop' There has got to be more at stake than wire jewelery. Is it the opinion of the Town Attorney that our Codes are permeable? Mrs. Moores' linking non-comforming pre-existing businesses like the Candyman with the Ehrlich project comes to mind when you read some of the documents here forwarded. the PB, Thanks to you and ----- Original Message ----- Doug From: Fredrica Wachsberger To: Doug Constant ; Skip0345 daol.com ; Anne Hopkins Sent: Tuesday, February 07. 2006 1103 AM Subject: Fwd: Ehrlich and Sea Cliff Coffee Shop Fredrica Wachsberger Please note new email: flwssnaootonline.nei Begin forwarded message: From: Keri Christ <kachrist a>rcn.com> Date: February 7, 2006 10:25:47 AM EST To: 'Fredrica Wachsberger' <flwssn ootonline net> Subject: Ehrlich and Sea Cliff Coffee Shop Freddie, I searched the Unified Court System website a number of ways (under his attorneys name Rosenberg Calica & Birney, his name, town's name) and did not see a case pending. I called the Sea Cliff Village Hall and spoke to Pat Guy, a deputy. (516-671-0080) I believe the case is still pending, as she was very reluctant to speak with me about the status. She said that she would have someone call me back about it. I explained that I was a resident of Orient and member of Orient Association, and we had been fighting his plans for a coffee shop for some time and that there was a meeting in early March, so we were anxious to ]Find out about their experience. I have appended several articles below regarding the suit which was filed in fall of 20D4; apparently he claimed anti-semitism. So he plays dirty. Town was very offended by this suggestion. You may or may not know that this is the same Robert Ehrlich of Sea Cliff who owns a snack food company Roberts American Gourmet (the company that sells Pirate's Booty snacks- I have seen them before). Pat Guy confirmed that this is the same guy, so he has the money to spend on litigation... Hope this helps, Keri Opinion On Behalf of Sea Cliff Coffee... This firm represents Robert Ehrlich and the Sea Cliff Coffee Company. We write in connection with the lawsuit recently filed by our firm on Mr. Ehrlich's behalf against the Village of Sea Cliff and various officials concerning his application for a permit to operate a small coffee shop in a business district of the village. I am writing to correct the distortions and mischaracterization of that lawsuit which recently appeared in several letters to the editor. Mr. Ehrlich's lawsuit asserts 16 separate claims against the village, only two of which allege discrimination on the basis of religion on the part of the specifically -named defendants. As stated in detail in the complaint filed in federal court, Mr. Ehrlich was treated in a discriminatory manner in connection with his zoning application and subjected to a selective enforcement of the village's zoning laws in violation of his right to equal protection, in violation of his property rights and in violation of his civil rights. As just one sample of the discriminatory treatment, the lawsuit alleges that Mr. Ehrlich is one of the few business owners in the village who can provide private on -site parking for his patrons. Other business owners, who have no on -site parking, routinely receive full variances from the village code and its parking requirements. However, when it came to Mr. Ehrlich - who can provide the required parking - the village declared the parking inadequate and imposed numerous onerous conditions on any permit to be issued to him. The village also contended that since Mr. Ehrlich's property was within 500-feet of a county road, his application required a special referral to the Nassau County Planning Commission and the Sea Cliff Planning Board. However, as alleged in the lawsuit, similarly -situated property owners, who had property within 500-feet of a county road, were not subjected to such a referral and the lengthy delays and/or problems attendant thereto. The village also contended that, among other things, because Mr. Ehrlich's property was across the street from an historic structure (where a village trustee and his wife resided), Mr. Ehrlich's proposed modest use of the property could have a significant impact on the environment, and directed Mr. Ehrlich to prepare and file a Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("DEIS") which is a lengthy report analyzing the environmental impact of the proposed use, including traffic studies and noise testing. In sharp contrast and as alleged in the lawsuit, similarly -situated property owners who proposed far more drastic changes and/or uses than Mr. Ehrlich's small coffee bar and who were also contiguous to historic structures and/or whose proposed work required SEQRA review under the village's own environmental ordinances, were not required to prepare a DEIS or otherwise undergo SEQRA review. According to the lawsuit, Mr. Ehrlich was singled out for such stringent scrutiny, causing an almost two-year delay in the application process at great expense. I have read the letters to the editor from persons who stated they are Jewish and have never personally experienced anti-Semitism in the village. The fact that they have not personally experienced anti-Semitism in the village is relevant only to their personal experience - it does not mean that other individuals have not experienced such discrimination, nor does it mean that it does not exist. Moreover, the invidious nature of discrimination, whether based on race, religion, disability, or age, is often expressed in subtle ways. Particularly where a person has applied for a permit which is in the villaige's discretion to approve or deny, discriminatory intent can easily be concealed under the pretest of exercising "discretion." Indeed, Mr. Ehrlich is not the only resident who has alleged discrimination by the village authorities and there is currently at least one federal lawsuit pending against the village which alleges racial discrimination in connection with a zoning application. Another letter writer incorrectly states that the lawsuit accuses the entire village of being anti- Semitic. The complaint does not state that every resident of Sea Cliff is anti-Semitic; rather, the lawsuit alleges that the specifically -named defendants engaged in discrimination, among other things, in connection with their review of Mr. Ehrlich's zoning application. Rather than vilify Mr. Ehrlich for asserting his constitutional rights without having all the facts, I suggest it would be more appropriate to allow the court system to address and determine the allegations made against the village and its officials in due course. Lesley A. Reardon Rosenberg Calica & Birney LLP ONLINE EDITION FRIDAY October 01, 2004 *Current r Edition t *Calendar of Events x *Archive L News 11 Sports 11 Opinion LObituaries 11 Contents Jj News Cost of Coffee Could Reach $90 Million in Sea Cliff Sea Cliff Coffee Company Sues Village By Adam Bedell Robert Ehrlich, owner of the Sea Cliff Coffee Company, delivered a summons to the Village of Sea Cliff on Thursday, Sept. 16. The complaint is against the village, Mayor Eileen K:rieb, former Mayor Claudia Moyne, Village Attorney Richard Siegel, and the board of trustees, the zoning board of appeals, and the planning board, as well as their members. The complaint is about 50 pages long and can be read at village hall, or copies can be made for twenty five -cents a page. Mr. Ehrlich, in the summons, asserts that the village has discriminated against him, forcing him to comply with burdensome standards to which other similar establishments are not held. The summons lists possible reasoning as retaliation for plaintiffs' political views, religion, and the proximity of plaintiffs' property to the house of a village trustee." 'The village and Mr. Ehrlich are not making public comments at the moment since the case is in litigation, but the village has issued a statement asserting that they believe the allegations are false, and that they will be vindicated. No court dates have been publicly released, and Mr. Ehrlich's attorneys were not available for comment at press time. The :summons demands a jury, and lists 19 counts. Nine of the counts ask for a minimum of $10 million. The complaint mentions many instances where Mr. Ehrlich alleges to be treated differently when compared to similar businesses in Sea Cliff. There are examples of parking restrictions and limits on hours of operation, requirements and forms that were demanded but should not have been needed, the complaint says, and many additional claims that the village acted in an extraneous manner to limit the company's business. In addition, there are samples describing similarly -situated businesses who were not subjected to the same scrutiny, even when they were involved in "much more intensive use of the land proposed by the plaintiff." One example cites that Sea Cliff unfairly attempted to regulate the food at the Sea Cliff Coffee Company. It states, "There shall not [be] any cooking on the Premises. There shall not be any roasting of coffee beans on the premises." The village of Sea Cliff is due to answer the complaint within fourteen days of receipt, which be would Oct. 1. ENB - REGION 1 NOTICES Completed Applications Consolidated SPDES Renewals Conditioned Negative Declaration Nassau County - The Planning Board of the Village of Sea Cliff, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed Sea Cliff Coffee Company will not have a significant adverse environmental impact provided specific conditions are met. There will be a 30 day public comment period commencing with the date of this notice. The action involves: . Extension of hours to 7 am - 10:30 pm, Mon., Sat., and 7am - 5 pm Sunday. . Conversion of middle interior space to lounge with live music. . Addition of 14 seats - parking variance required. . Permission for "light cooking" (microwave/toaster oven). The project is located at 100 Roslyn Avenue, Sea Cliff, New 'York. The conditions are: (1) The Sea Cliff Coffee Company will execute a document, :satisfactory to the Village Attorney of the Village of Sea Cliff, that it will not permit the sale or possession of alcoholic beverages on the premises, and that it will waive any right it may have to obtain a license from the State Liquor Authority for the sale of alcoholic beverages on the premises. (2) Any music generated on the premises shall not be audible beyond the property line of the premises, in strict adherence to '50-16(D) of the Code of the Village of Sea Cliff (whether or not a license is, strictly speaking, required by Chapter 50 of the said Code). (3) The preparation of food by the Sea Cliff Coffee Company shall be as stated in the letter dated January 30, 2004, from Freudenthal & Elkowitz to the Planning Board, to wit: AAs indicated in the ... Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and expounded upon at the January 14, 2004 public hearing, the applicant is seeking permission to use a microwave and toaster oven for warming and toasting of breads, bagels, pastries, etc. In addition, the applicant intends to prepare sandwiches, salads and similar items that do not require actual >cooking= (i.e., on a stove or in an oven).... the applicant does not intend to install a stove or oven or any other cooking apparatus that would require installation of an exhaust fan and possibly result in odors emanating from the building. (4) All outdoor lighting, including lighting affixed to the larger building on the west side of the premises, shall be pointed downward at the ground or shielded so that it does not produce any glare on adjoining streets or nearby properties. Contact: Patricia Guy, Village of Sea Cliff, 300 Sea Cliff Avenue, Sea Cliff, NY 11579, phone: (516) 671-0080. Keri Christ, Esq. 115 Perry Street New York, NY 10014 T: 212-727-3536 M:917-470-0866 F: 212-202-3918 E: kachrist(abrcn.com DISCLAIMER This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney -client communication and as such privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. From: Fredrica Wachsberger [mailto:flwssn(aloptonline netl Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 9:25 AM To: Doug Constant; Anne Hopkins; Keri Christ Subject: Fwd: skip some of you will already know this; please circulate to other concerned folks. anne, we should get out a special mailing; unless we can cut this off at the pass, the public hearing will be march 13, doug and i can probably put info together for text of mailing which i think should include encouragement for people to show up at hearing, tearoffs for contributions and a petition. at public meeting, i will represent scsr and use charts showing danger of intersection (there was a smash-up at the corner yesterday). others can address zoning, the worst case scenarios of what could go in there etc. keri, the owner robert ehrlich was intending to sue the town of seacliff in relation to a similar proposal, can you check the legals and see if such a suit was in fact filed and where it is now?f Fredrica Wachsberger Please note new email: flwS1Sn(a)optonline net Begin forwarded message: From: Skip0345aaol.com Date: January 25, 2006 10:58:40 AM EST To: f1wssnCWoptonline,net Subject: skip Hil I'm going in to the city today. I have doctors' appointments tomorrow and Friday. I'll be back out here Sunday. At the writing workshop yesterday, Valerie Scopaz had advice and warnings about the Ehrlich coffee shop. It is coming up for a public hearing soon ( she didn't know the date.) She said we need to mount a carefully coordinated campaaign of speeches, many different people tanking calmly, no ranting, each person bringing up a new point, agreeing with everything the previous speakers brought up and adding something new, a different slant. She said the "buffer zone" approach can be bypassed by him asking for a hardship variance. She said it is clear Ihe's using this "small antique shop" ruse as a way of getting around the opposition and will expand as soon as he gets in there. She said we should be VERY CAREFUL in what alternative businesses we propose. For example, she said a doctor's office requires all sorts of technicians and will have a tremendous amourd of parking and cars in and out, not just patients but staff as well. Throughout this, my own personal main concern has been music all day. Onward. Skip 51 TE PLAN 51-FUATE: ORIENT TOM 5OUTHOLD SUFFOLK 'COUNTY, NY SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX u 1000-IS-5-5 MAP PREPARED: 01-22-03 WELL LOCATED 02-15-03 UPDATE 03-06-03, 04-0-7-03 OWNER: Robert Ehrlich 2254 Main Road Orient NY 11957 ; I ; st ne ; ; F❑ oe C'J ; ; ; ; I I � NOTES: ■ MONUMENT O PIPE STAKE psi, S SANITARY VP - K KITGHEN EP EXPAN51ON POOL 5T SEPTIC, TANK GT 6REA5E TRAP 8 LP LEAGHING POOL • z AREA = 12,145 5F OR 0.28 ACRES PROPERTY RESIDES IN: ZONE "B" GENERAL BU15NE55 WELL 4 SEPTIC LOCATIONS PROVIDED BY OTHERS ELEVATIONS REFERENCE GOUNTY TOPO MAPS GRAPHIC 56ALE I"= 20' a„b WELL I I I I septic 150'. ,u,b 0 0 c� l� Z } Tree TreeG Planted by early settlers Malmo SR #25 `\ y llz-44 11 Sj<62G9'* _.qry \ 5 t `rJ�ne GP I ELL 4a'0 y�K�r��F /o�Q pti�e//i7 �9s> 75 L�Av e// n dwelling well septic 15" Monument to Local Veterans � 3 Cu cr, u 01 /i e N W+E s � kSt-°ea�L PFrcWin m.�� P� —FIIIIi� uwLewa •1 lYr� �.. +l sve�^5 ka[m,Fu n o� JOHN C. EHLERS LAND SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 50202 RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Fax 369-8287 REF. -\\Hp server\d\PROS\01-302c.pro 4 3 2 1 LANDSCAPE BUFFER HEDGE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE 5-6' HIGH LEYLAND CYPRESS 6" STOCKADE DOUBLE ROW STAGARED SPACING AT 2.5' APART FENCE GROWTH RATE 12-18" PER YEAR B B 5-2' LEYLEAND CYPRESS k QECE MAR J06 Southold Town Planni o Board A A - Michael Mapes,P.E. � PEA D. M y0 163 PENINSULA PATH 9°Ftop co RIVERHEAD, N.Y 11901 ., W PHONE 369-2170 m L TITLE: ART, ANTIQUE AUCTION GALLERY y�`o 107050A LANDSCAPE CROSS SECTION 1000-18-5-5 LAND my A BDRAWING NUMBER DAM3-S20 sc, rr. NONE SMe 1 OF 4 3 2 1 8 I 7 6 1 5 1i 4 I 3 2 D f N TEST HOLE MoDONAL0 GEOSCIENCE 6-13-02 EL=2D.1 SITE PLAN KEY DW. - DRYWELL LP - LEACHING POOL ST - SEPTIC TANK EP - EXPANSION POOL VIEW B VIEW A CONTINUOUS RAILING VIEW A 1-�" DIAMETER" .-SECTION A -A 12, 12° 12,1' 3 3 1 (REF) CONCRETE RAMP CONCRETE LANDING MISTING LANDING 1:12 SLOPE MAX. FLUSH WITH EX PORC WOOD PORCH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMP ELEVATION VIEW RA I LIN 42' CONCRETE RAMP AND LANDING w o WITH 6" MIN THK WITH k 6 WWF -� AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 6' rn x CONCRETE GRASS GRASS-4-7RAILING CONTINUOUS 0- RAMPa SECTION A -A RAMP CROSS SECTION CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK 4- RAILIN ,-VIE s THK WITH WIRE FABRIC HANDICAP RAMP PLAN VIE EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 8 CONCRETE WALKWAY CROSS SECTION HANDICAP WALK/RAMP DETAILS RAMP AND WALKWAY IN CONFORMANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998 Historic NO SCALE 50-65% BASE CIA G.- Tree Planted by early I`£' 2�crete curb settlers DOME SECTION OO=R O O d OME (TYP) 1-61 MIN SR25 974 '\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 °I=tes' 41 61 00 0000000 610 0000000000 --1B.55 O O O O O O O O O - a00 24 TY000 P so 7 6 MIN 16 MI 34 DOME SPACING .Oe DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD DETAILS °I=tes I DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN MM WE AS SH µIN Mon FRONT n Urn en t ENTRANCE z tc Local MAX, SLOPE 1.12 INCH:PIAYi CD - vc Ny Opc•' SEt, ITEM 10608,0103 DRIVEWAY WIDTH WIDTH SHOWN ON PLANS NOTE 1 a SEE NOTE 2 VET s """ z- Veterans DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN - 3/4 EXPANSION JOINT RIHE GE 7[h j USE > WALKWAY 1. THIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, o i 2. THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SUP RESISTANT TEXTURE. A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE. ENTRANCE SIGN POSTED SHOWN old 5c o' 3. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER yo O ■'.ry PARK ` 4. THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE N PARe■1ry\�0 COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION KING 5. 1" REVEAL REQUIRED ,. TIME 6. DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS INSTALLED AS SHOWN �i 6L6E SPRDOE ,R;,, ITEM LIST FOR N.Y.S.D.O.T, RED. O MUTCD CODE 37-1 NO PARKING SIGN INSTALLD AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN SIGN DIMENSIONS 12"XI8" ITEM N0. DESCRIPTION x** INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD CODE;EC➢oN 2B-39 10608.0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - UNREINFORCED *## 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS - CLASS F -EX rH4 *** DRIVEWAY, ** O 7e* ' SCORE MARK rin,o lAi °�'re / AL FULL HEIGHT CURB SHOULDER WORK AREA ONES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS LIDAYS NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE TED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS vIPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHOULDER WORK AREA )RDING TO FIGURE 302,9 OF THE N.Y.S.D,D.T. JAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES JUALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 234.10, 238.1, 238.4, 238.7, 254.2, 301.2, AND SUBCHAPTER G, 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301.12 7 4 SIDEWALK 1/4" FT BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS - I' R=1" DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: 2 WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608,0103 V=ARC ROOF LEGEND SHOULDER WORK AREA ONES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS LIDAYS NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE TED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS vIPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHOULDER WORK AREA )RDING TO FIGURE 302,9 OF THE N.Y.S.D,D.T. JAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES JUALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 234.10, 238.1, 238.4, 238.7, 254.2, 301.2, AND SUBCHAPTER G, 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301.12 7 4 SIDEWALK 1/4" FT BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS - I' R=1" DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: 2 WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608,0103 V=ARC ROOF LEGEND FLAGGER OFLAG TREE ® WORK AREA CONE END ROAD WORK Nil 500't NO w SHOULDER 9 0 N 50I 0'f s11ouLDER WORK NOTES: APPROVED SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT,OF HEALTH REF# 110-02-0016 APPROVED NEW YORK STATE O.O.T. PERMIT # 10-05-0458 TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S.F. OR 0.28 ACRES PARKING AREA = 3846 S.F. OR 32?4 LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING AREA 6974 S.F. OR 57Y LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR 11% COVERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1714 FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE 15OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIGHT IN PARKING AREA ONLY. LOCATED AS SHOWN. OPERATED DURING STORE HOURS ONLY. TRUCK DELIVERIES TO BE SCHEDULED BEFORE OR AFTER STORE OPEN HOURS BULK PARKING CALCULATIONS - USE AREA # SPACES REWO PER CODE SPACES PROVIDED SALES SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 250 S.F, SALES AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION V=1327 X 0.17 X 1 = 226 C.F. s6wn Y.enu 226/42.24 FOR 8' OIA, RINGS = 6 V.L.F. 2� DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A WINVIIIIIIIIIIIIINY64J SCALE: N.T.S. 7" 1"� REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' CIA. DRYWELL STONE PARKING AREA f. V = 3846 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 392 C.F. STORE SIGN DETAILS NOTES: � o, CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK E C E 0 W E SIGN LOCATED BETWEEN SECOND FLOOR FRONT WINCOWS 1. DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS, "DIRT" V 572 X 0.17 X 1 98 C,F. WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT REQUIRED DRIVEWAYS NOT = = D SPECIFIED THE T to of a" me"t CONSTRUCTED ucTED of 3" of ITEM 608,0201 AND ° Is E TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES O THE L T A JAN 2 3 2006 to-1-o 2. THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY 392 C,F, + 98 C.F, = 490 C.F. 10_1_12 SHALL BE 6" THICK, WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED (ITEM 10608.0103) AS SHOWN IN SECTION A -A V = 490/4224 FOR 8' CIA RINGS - 12' SITE FLAN SCALE: 111- 201 KEY MAP SCALE 1 "=200' SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 TOP Item 402.098301M & Item 402.0983011M existing povl 1n BINDER Item 402198901M & of Item 402.1989011M yN BASE Item 402.378901M & dU am Item 402.3789011M u a� <� SUBBASE p. Item 17304.1011 TEM 10403.0903 (FULL DEPTH) DETAIL MEETING EXIST. ASPHALT PAV'T (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10403,0903 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT / CONCRETE BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE RETAIL "e jmTN TOTAL 16T FLOOR 132 672 221 4125 2ND FLOOR 482 NONE 156 507 ATTIC 3" NONE 50 407 TOTAL SPACE 941 572 418 1920 NOTES( 1. BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH T-9" AND W-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. REQUIRED 8' DIA TOTAL DEPTH = 12' Southold Town Plaanug Board TOTAL REQUIRED B' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 18' PROVIDE 3 - 8' CIA. X 5' DEEP AND 1-8',DIA, X 3' DEEP DRYWELLS ORYWELLS #1, #2 AND #3 SHALL BE 5' DEEP CONCRETE CURB TYPE A DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP ITEM 10609.2801 N,T S. NOTE: THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING .XISTING CURB PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN 6" RCA SUBASE THE LAST 10 FEET AT LOCATIONS ACING TRAFFIC. 2" STONE HANDICAP PARKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 LANDSCAPE BUFFER HEDGE SPECIFICATIONS Michael MapeS,P.E. PROVIDE 5-6' HIGH LEYLAND CYPRESS 163 PENINSULA ATH DOUBLE ROW STAGARED SPACING AT 2.5' APART RIVERHEAD N.Y 11901 GROWTH RATE 12-18" PER YEAR PHONE 369-2170 SITE PLAN PREPARED 1-13-2006 TITLE:ANTIQUE SHOP, AUCTION SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD GALLERY, ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOP ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 OR WORKSHOP SITE PLAN OWNER: ROBERT EHRLICH P.O. BOX 326 SD 1000-18-5-5 SITE E SEACLIf F, N.Y. 11579 DRAWING NUMBER ()ATE: 1-13-M SCALE: IIII SHEET I OF I 2 1 0-(X-/7,, C 8 1 7 6 5 1 3 A IV TEST HOLE MCDONALD GEOSCIENCE 6-13-02 EL=20.1 SITE PLAN KEY DW. - DRYWELL LP - LEACHING POOL ST - SEPTIC TANK EP - EXPANSION POOL SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 SITE PLAN SCALE: a, "= 20' CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK 6" THK WITH WIRE FABRIC EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY B' Q CROSS SECTION Lr HANDICAP WALK DETAILS Cn CD z O a stop o signor 46 '� Historic 16 ]6 Tree Planteld by early 1] ncrete curb settlers -- Main Road SR #25 674 e1=16 S. tf. Q) 0) IV 1]-4-23 , 1a-1-tG `V p � 17-4-25.3 17-4-25.2 MQ/n 18-1-15 ,6-,- 1]-6-9.2 Raaa 1]-5-10 15-5-1 11-6-9.1 17-6-11 6-5-4, 17-6-12 0 18-5-2 24-1-1 a Q 25-1-J Q 6.2 24-,-2 25-1-9,1 6 25-1-10 25-1-11 n 3 C 1-- Py 01- W156, ZOO A ITEM 106 DOME SPACING DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD DETAILS DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN MM MAX, SLOPE 1:12 R7-1 MUTCD CODE R7-1 NO PARKING SIGN INSTALLED f.', SHOWN ON SITE PLAN SIGN DIMENSIONS 12'XIB' INSTABLE DIN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCD CODE SECION 28-39 Y 18-5-6 25-2-4.10 25-2-20 20 KEY MAP SCALE 1 "=200' HIGHWAY BOUNDARY- 2 NOTES ALL LANES MUST HE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND AFTER 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS OR PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR ME APPROOVALJGS FROM THE NOTBE PERMIT INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS EXAMPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHOULDER WORK AREA 1 SHOULDER WORK AREA ACCORDING TO FIGURE 302.9 OF THE N.Y.S.D.O.T, MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SCALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 234.10, 2381, 238.4, 2387, 254.2, 301.2, AND SUBCHAPTER G. 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301,12 GER [LE:GEND :FLAGTREE AREA 0 v Q fl END RoaD woRK 500'f NO SHOULDER 500't SHOULDER WORK < S L NOTES: DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN 3/4' EXPANSION JOINT TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S,F. OR 0.28 ACRES 1. HIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO AodacENr PROPERTIES PARKING AREA = 4742 S.F. OR 39% LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING AREA 6036 S,F, OR 50% LOT COVERAGE 2. THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SLIP RESISTANT TEXTURE. A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE. EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR IIY COVERAGE 3. REPAIR EXISPNG SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TORO MAPS 4. THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUISNESS DISTRICT) COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1314 s, 1" REVEAL REQUIRED FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE 150 WATT HALOGEN AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIHGHT IN 6. DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS INSTALLED As SHOWN PARKING AREA ONLY. LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ITEM LIST FOR N.Y.J.D.U.T. REQ. BULK PARKINGCALCULATIONR ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION 10608.0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - UNREINFORCED 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS - CLASS F AREA __ # SPACES REQ'O PER CODE SPACES PROVIDED RETAIL SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 200 S.F. AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS FULL HEIGHT CURB 7,• 4' SIDEWALK 1/4' %Pr. - - - - - - - - - - ---- DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: R=1" V=ARC 2' WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608.0103 V_10327 X 0.11 X 1 = 226 C.F. ORlvewaY CURB SECTION 226/42.24 FOR 8' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. DRYWELL DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A 7 STONE PARKING AREA SCALE N.T.B' V = 4742 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 484 C.F. NOTES: CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK rCA 1. DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS. s'. V = 572 X 0.17 X 1 = 98 C.F. WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT REQUIRED & "DIRT' DRIVEWAYS NOT SPECIFIED THE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" OF ITEM 608.0201 AND to of Cvement� TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGECONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES484 C.F. + 98 C.F. = 583 C.F.2. THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY V = 533/42.24 FOR 8' DIA RINGS = 14' SHALL BE 6" THICK, WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED (ITEM 1060B.0103) AS SHOWN IN SECTION A -A BASE Item 402.37B901M k a ` Hem 402.3789011M - SUBBASE io Item 17304.1011 ZTEM 10403.0903 (FULL DEPTH) DETAIL MEETING EXIST, ASPHALT PAV'T (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10403,0903 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT / CONCRETE BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE RETAIL "s AIRS" TOTAL IETFUOOR 182 572 221 Y25 2ND FLOOR 4W NONE 165 597 ATTIC 877 NONE 30 407 TOTALSPACE Y11 572 H6 1920 NOTES: 1, BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH 5'-9" AND V-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. REQUIRED 8' CIA TOTAL DEPTH = 14' - N ROFESSION* 9 TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 22' PROVIDE 3 - 8' DIA. X 7' DEEP AND 1-8' DIA. X 3' DEEP ORYWELLS ORYWELLS #1, #2,AND #3 SHALL BE 7' DEEP CONCRETE CURB DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP 'I'111 TYPE A ITEM 10609.2e01 JUl ' 6 2005 N.T.S. PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS NOTE THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING PXISTING CURB 6" RCA SUBASE SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN 2" STONE THE LAST 10 FEET AT LOCATIONS FACING TRAFFIC. HANDICAP PAKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SH W-N-` HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH SITE PLAN PREPARED 7-1-2005 RIVERH -- - N.Y 11901 SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD PHONE 369-2170 ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 TITLE: ORIENT GIFT SHOP OWNER; ROBERT EHRLICH P,O, BOX 326 S E PLAN SEACLIFF, N.Y. 11579 100WSCTM# 1000-18-;-5 B-8-5-5 SITE RAGER C 3 Jn♦ 4 3 DATE:7-1-05 SCALE; SHEET I OF I 1 V ■ I ■ 3 2 D I� I 0.�..1. — c,v SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 KEY MAP SCALE 1`200' 8 7 6 101 GRF AP WALK FABRIC '-VERY 8' cp,-- P vy S�` M1SGDRAMEW NOTES t ALL LANES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND AFTER 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS SHOULDER WORK AREA EXAMPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHOULDER WORK AREA ACCORDING TO FIGURE 302.9 OF THE N.Y,S.D.O.T. MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SCALE: N T.S. NOTES 1. SEE SECTIONS 234.10, 238.1, 238.4, 238 7, 254.2, 301 2, AND SUBCHAPTER G. 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301.12 DD END ROAD WORK r500x i 0 U E Pr NO SHouLOER 0 0 x 500'3 SHOULDER WORK 'SEE No'E 1 \ NOTES: DftwEWAY WIDTH +6' `CURB TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S.F. OR 0,28 ACRES ` PARKING AREA = 4742 S.F, OR 39% LOT COVERAGE 3/4" EXPANSION JOINT LANDSCAPING AREA 6036 S.F. OR 50% LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR 11% COVERAGE DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS 1. THIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO AOJACCNT PROPERTIES, SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUISNESS DISTRICT) PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1714 2 THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SLIP RESISTANT TEXTURE. A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE 150 WATT HALOGEN AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIHGHT IN 3, REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER PARKING AREA ONLY. LOCATIONS AS SHOWN 4. THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRON"AGE AT THE CGMPLETON D, CONSTRUCTION BULK PARKING CALCULATIONS' 5. 1" REVEAL REQUIRED ITEM LIST FOR N,Y.S.D.O,T. REO. ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION USE AREA # SPACES REQ'D PER CODE SPACES PROVIOEO� RETAIL SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 200 S,F, AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 10608.0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK — UNREINFORCED BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS — CLASS. F SCORE MARK FULL HEIGHT CURB 7^ 4' SIDEWALK 1 /4" /FT. ITEM 10608,0103 DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION --/ DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A SCALE N T S NOTES: 1. DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS. WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT REQUIRED & 'DIRT" DRIVEWAYS NOT SPECIFIED THE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" OF ITEM 608,0201 AND CONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES 2. THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE 6" THICK, WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED (ITEM 10608.0103) AS SHOWN IN SEC DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: V=ARC ROOF V=1327 X 0.17 X 1 = 226 C.F. 226/42.24 FOR 8' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. L, REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. ORYWELL - -- STONE PARKING AREA MAY 1 0 2005 V = 4742 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 484 C.F. CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK V=572X0.17X1=98C,F, ' TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE 484 C.F. + 98 C.F. = 583 C.F. V = 533/42.24 FOR B' DIA RINGS = 14' REQUIRED 8' DIA TOTAL DEPTH = 14' TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 22' PROVIDE 3 - 8' DIA. X 7' DEEP AND 1-8' DIA. X 3' DEEP ORYWELLS DRYWELLS #1, #2,AND #3 SHALL BE 7' DEEP U DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS 6" RCA SUBASE 2" STONE HANDICAP FAKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN eviseo9 Rov't J BINDER 4402.198901M & ri Item a0z.1989011M rw CONCRETE CURB HANDICAP TYPE A PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ]CC/ANSI A117.1-1998 BASE Item 402.378901M A, p >m am ITEM 10609.2801 N.T,S. Item 402.3789011M a xN a� NOTE: THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING EXISTING CURB T DOWN A ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN SHALL BE 10 FELT THE LAST 10 FEfi AT LOCATIONS FACING TRAFFIC Michael M P.E. SUBBASE Is Item "'D41°" 3 PENINSU A PATH TEM 10403,0903 (FULL DEPTH) SITE PLAN PREPARED 5-4-2005 IE NX 11901 NEW yO AISPHALT PAVT MEETING EXIST SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD 5 PHONE 3 170 LD M gA�N'A* (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10a6a.O903 saw curnNG ASPHALT / CONCRETE ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 OWNER: ROBERT EHRLICH TITLE: DRY T BUILDING W P.O. EOX 326 SITE PLAN SEACHFF, N.Y. 11579 �= SCTM# 1000-1F-5-5 SZE 1000-1$-5-5 SI �Y6BOA 1O P D JS �— DRAWING NUMBER ✓ DATE: 54-05 SCALE: 1"=20' SHEET 1 OF 1 4 REV. A 9011 C R I1 / I I 5 2 K FIRST TOTAL F C SECOf B TOTA O BASEMENT PLAN CRAWLSPACE ATTIC FLOOR PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 407 SOFT 8 I 7 I 6 I 5 a* 4 3 C1 110 BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE RETAIL HSTAIRS H STAIRS TOTAL 1 ST FLOOR 132 572 221 925 2ND FLOOR 432 NONE 165 597 ATTIC 377 NONE 30 407 TOTAL SPACE 941 572 416 1929 NOTES: c 1. BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH 5'-9" AND 6'-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. y _J a S 0 z Mic �1 P.E. 1 33 NINSULA PAT ERHEAD, MY 11901 )F "E W Y PHONE 369-2170 "��D. D. �oP� TITLE: ROBERT EHRLICH STORE RETAIL STORE FLOOR PLANS 07050 2� SIZE 1000-18-5-5 FLRPLN nv. r 4pFEss�O`' D A DRAWWG r unmEe proved DATE: 415-05 SCAM 1/4"=1' SMET 1 OF 1 2 �� _ 1 u n u � I b I u 101 q SITE PLAN KEY DW. — DRYWELL LP — LEACHING POOL ST SEPTIC TANK EP — EXPANSION POOL b PO Pork nB area � v v °iz o°h r 4u Hvh iC'f�B O yy l W y m b ow y F' o N 4kZ° �s r I Q O 4a N s7 0. 6� 4'�L i .) uu W � Isfl��9 SITE PLAN SCALE: WIN= 0 M listcric Tree 'l(in ted y early ettlers concrete rb &4K 1b 62 46'noLIeo A3 Peg- Do i I' I Monument to Local G Veterans ✓o 3 lV � U U Al � CD SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 NOTES: PLEASE SEE SHEET 2 FOR LANDSCAPE DESIGI TOTAL AREA=12,148 S.F OR 0.29 ACRES PARKING AREA 4742 S.F. OR 39% COVERAGE LANDSCAPE AREA 3871 S.F. OR 50% COVERAO, EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1370 S.F. OR 11 % CCJERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY T)PO MAPS' SITE ZONING B BUISNESS SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY APRON AND CURB CUl AS PER DOT STANDARDS BULK PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL SPACE 642 S.F. PROVIDE 1 SPACE 1250 S.F. PROVIDE 3 SPACES TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 4 SPACES PROVIDED = 6 INCLUDING I HANDICAP DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA V=ARC ROOF VV=1327 x 0.17 x 1 V=226 C.F. 226 / 42.24 FOR 8' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REOUIItED 1- 6' DEEP 8' DIA DRY WELL TOTAL REQUIRED- 8' DIA RINGS WITH 21' DEPTH PROVIDE 3-8' DIA X 6' DEEPAND 2-S' DIA X T DEEP RINGS DRY W:F.,L #1 AND 1,13 SIIALL 3'E T DREP F.IIkir,S DRYWELL #2 AND #4 SHALL BE 4' DEEP PARKING LOT SPECIFICATION GRASS GRASS CROSS HANDICAP W. CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK 6" THK WITH WIRE FABRIC EXPANSI❑N J❑INTS EVERY m Michael Mape E. 163 PENINSULA PAT RIVERHEAD, MY 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: DRY RETAIL BUILDING SITE PLAN SD 1000-18-5-5 SITE A DRAWAIGNUASM DATE: 4-12-05 seeLe: 1"=20' Saner 1 DH 1 9 C IF 11 °x a A OCI 7 I 6 m 3 2 lub IC x A SITE PLAN KEY DW. — DRYWELL LP — LEACHING POOL ST — SEPTIC TANK EP — EXPANSION POOL vrev N80•�, 0 93, "W� '15' _6 b DW yoa" • N 4�Z° s r B4//d/iTj� 2 yi 9 5�' 62'0 w biros/0" 01 r °� Nre�(°nP fherf 9S, ° SITE PLAN SCALE: I" =vl Z istorlc Tree lonted y early ettlers r.fae C �ncrete rb a� Monument to Local G Veterons 0 3 U U CD 0) Q r.fas SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1CO-18-5-5 NOTES: PLEASE SEE SHEET 2 FOR LANDSCAPE DESIGN TOTAL AREA=12,148 S.F OR 0.28 ACRES PARKING AREA 4742 S.F. OR 39% COVERAGE LANDSCAPE AREA 3871 S.F. OR 50% COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1370 S.F. OR 11 % COVERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS SITE ZONING B BUISNESS SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY APRON AND CURB CUT AS PER, DOT STANDARDS BULK PARKING CALCULATIONS RETAIL SPACE 642 S.F. PROVIDE ISPACE/250S.F. //yoo PROVIDE 3 SPACES - TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED = 4 SPACES PROVIDED = 6 INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA V=ARC ROOF V=1327 x 0.17 x 1 V=226 C.F. 226 / 42.24 FOR 8' DIA. RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REQUIRED 1- 6' DEEP 8' DIA DRY WELL TOTAL REQUIRED- 8' DIA RINGS WITH 21' DEPTH PP JC�M-H 3 .g' DIA X 6' DEEP A.ND 2-g' D>•.A.X 7' DErP R.LNr(;c DRYWELL #1 AND #3 SHALL BE T DEEP RINGS DRYWELL #2 AND #4 SHALL BE 4' DEEP PARING LOT SPECIFICATION GRASS �/— GRASS mw; q CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK cv 6" THK WITH WIRE FABRIC o EXPANSI❑N J❑INTS EVERY 8 CROSS SECTI❑N HANDICAP WALK DETAILS APR 12 "OW) Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RNERHEAD, MY 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: DRY RETAIL BUILDING SITE PLAN SME 1000-18-5-5 SITE u DRAWA1G1Nh1EER DATE:4-12-05 SCALE: 1"=20' SUET 1 OF 1 REV, A a r /1 7 l�J 5 3 2 I 1 D C C I A N I 11 5 M VIEW B VIEW A CONTINUOUS RAILING 1-j" DIAMETER .-SECTION A -A VIEW A 12, 12" I 2,1'- " 3 " 43 5" CREF) CONCRETE RAMP CONCRETE LANDING METING LANDING 1:12 SLOPE MAX FLUSH WITH EX PORC WOOD PORCH CONTINUOUS CONCRETE HANDICAP RAMP ELEVATION VIEW RAILING 42" CONCRETE RAMP AND LANDING n WITH 6" MIN THIN WITH # 6 WWF C AND EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 6' u x CONCRETE GRASS 4, -GRASS CONTINUOUS a M RAM RAILING ¢- D' SECTION A -A RAMP CROSS SECTION CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK 4' 6" THK WITH at L 1 FK DW. - DRYWELL LP - LEACHING POOL ST - SEPTIC TANK EP - EXPANSION POOL SITE PLAN SCALE: I U= 201 SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-IB-5-5 -VIE EXPANSION JOINTSIREVERYB8C HANDICAP RAMP PLAN VIE CONCRETE WALKWAY CROSS SECTION HANDICAP WALK/RAMP DETAILS RAMP AND WALKWAY IN CONFORMANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A-117.1-1998 NO SCALE SO-65% BASE DIA ' ncrete curb 3-36 DOME SECTION - OME (TYP) 1-61 MIN 000 000 41 61 000a 000ao 610 HIGH ooa oo o o o 00 ooa 000a oo ooa aoo 24 TYP 6 MIN 16 MI DOME SPACING DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD DETAILS DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN MM Monument FRONT o Local ENTRANCE rUl- "" PN OY" SF l W15G. oR`NEvI 3 Veterans DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN 3/4' EXPANSION JOINT USE r WALKWAY 1 THIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, 3 J i o ENTRANCE SIGN POSTED AS SHOWN 2. THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SLIP RESISTANT TEXTURE, A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE, 3. REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER' A\VN O 4. THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE C)�Y�� COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION 5 1" REVEAL REQUIRED AN TIME 6. DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS INSTALLED AS SHOWN ITEM LIST FOR N.Y.S.D.O.T. REQ. MUTCD CODE 37-1 NO PARKING SIGN INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION SIGN DIMENSIONS 12"X18" INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUTCO GOOF SECTION 28-39 10608.0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - UNREINFORCED 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS - CLASS F Ylcnnlc DRIVEWAY SCORE MARK FULL HEIGHT CURB 7„ 4' SIDEWALK - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - 1/4" /F1 BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS 1" - R=1" DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: 2' WIRE FABRIC ITEM 10608.0103 V=ARC Y DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION ROOF / 226/42 X 0,17 X 1 = 226 C.F. oMwe<r:.vnv: 226/42.24 FOR 8' DIA, RINGS = 6 V.L.F. auv awry DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A IM�p. REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. DRYWELL �Ma� SCALE NTS % 2 t 1 SHOULDER WORK AREA AES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND 3 PM. NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS LIDAYS, NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE 'TED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS APLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHOULDER WORK AREA RDING TO FIGURE 302.9 OF THE N.Y.S.D.O.T. IAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SCALE: N.T.S. NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 23410, 238.1. 238.4, 238.7, 254,21 301.2, AND SUBCHAPTER G. 2. FOR TRANSITInki I rMrTW I Crr S ELEGENDGER TREE AREA EC,,ON 301.12 END ROAD WORK A s0at NO SHOULDER 9 0 500't SHOULDER WORK NOTES: APPROVED SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT.OF HEALTH REF# C10-02-0016 APPROVED NEW YORK STATE O.O.T, PERMIT # 10-05-045B TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S.F. OR 0.28 ACRES PARKING AREA = 3846 S.F. OR 32% LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING AREA 6974 S,F. OR 57% LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR 11% COVERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUISNESS OISTRICTI PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1714 FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE 15OW HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIGHT IN PARKING AREA ONLY, LOCATED AS SHOWN, OPERATED DURING STORE HOURS ONLY. TRUCK DELIVERIES TO BE SCHEDULED BEFORE OR AFTER STORE OPEN HOURS BULK PARKING CAI CF11 ATIn We. 18-1-10 USE AREA # SPACES REWD PER CODE SPACES PROVIDED SALES SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 250 S,F, SALES AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S.F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 � 1"� STONE PARKING AREA STORE SIGN DETAILS NOTES: V = 3846 X 0.17 X 0.6 = 392 C.F. --- _ SIGN LOCATED BETWEEN SECOND FLOOR FRONT WINDOWS 1. DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS. WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT "DIRT' + 's. CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK REQUIRED & DRIVEWAYS NOT SPECIFIED THE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE E of V = 572 X 0.17 X 1 = 98 C,F. CONSTRUCTED OF 3" OF ITEM 60B.0201 AND ovement ,a_,_g -� CONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES 2. THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EITHER SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY 1 TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE I D 1a-1-12 SHALL BE 6" THICK. WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED 392 C.F. + 98 C,F. = 490 C.F. I JAN 2 3 2006 e 9 (ITEM 10608.0103) AS SHOWN IN SECTION A -A K. U. VV. 18-2-23. -4-25 } 19-1-1} +-' 18-2-20.1 (n IB-1-IB 18-1-15 m CC 19-2-22,1 B-1-1 19-2-21 0 } ,R000' 18-5-1 S. R. 25 Sub e t 8-5-4. PGrCal 18-s-s.1 18-5-10 18-5-2 18-5 0 18-5-7 L� _7 25-1-B2 1e-s-e 1e-5-9.2 r �o 25-2-4.10 25-1-91 25-2-413 O C /a zs-2-} 25-1-11 nv 25-2-20.20 KEY MAP SCALE 1"=200' 8 1 7 1 6 1 5 ,�- TOP Item 402.098301M & Item 4020983011M evlsGnq pPVt n BINDER Item 402.198901M & N Item 402,19B9011M LJ BASE Item 402 378901 M & o am Item 402 3789011A n y m a'^ ¢b SUBBASE Item 17304.1011 ' Itm lu4us.u903 (FULL DEPTH) DETAIL MEETING EXIST. ASPHALT PAV'T (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10403,0903 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT / CONCRETE BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE RETAIL NI TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 132 572 221 MIS 2ND FLOOR 432 NONE 1e5 507 ATTIC 3" NONE 30 407 TOTALSPACE 941 572 416 1Y29 NOTES: 1. BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH T-9" AND V-1" F40OR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F, V = 490/42.24 FOR B' DIA RINGS = 12' N REQUIRED 8' CIA TOTAL DEPTH = 12' Southold Town � Planning 8oartl i TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 18' �--• �. -w -1 PROVIDE 3 - 8' CIA. X S' DEEP AND 1-8',DIA. X T DEEP DRYWELLS CONCRETE CURB DRYWELLS #1, #2 AND #3 SHALL BE 5' DEEP TYPE A DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP ITEM 10609.2601 N.T.S. NOTE: THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING EXISTING CURB PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN THE LAST 10 FEET AT LOCATIONS FACING TRAFFIC 6" RCA SUBASE 2" STONE HANDICAP PARKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 LANDSCAPE BUFFER HEDGE SPECIFICATIONS I Michael Ma e8 "D E PROVIDE 5-6' HIGH LEYLAND CYPRESS DOUBLE ROW STAGARED SPACING AT 2.5' APART GROWTH RATE 12-18" PER YEAR SITE PLAN PREPARED 1-13-2006 SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 OWNER: ROBERT EHRLICH P.O. BOX 326 SEACLIFF, N.Y. 11579 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, MY 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE:ANTIQUE SHOP, AUCTION 1ALLERY, ARTS AND CRAFTS SHOP OR WORKSHOP SITE PLAN BD 1000-18-5-5 SITE E. DRAWINONDA/DER DATE: 1-134006 SCALE: 1"=20' 1 1 SEBET I OF ], N C 11 A� 4 3 rn 7 4 I 3 2 EST HOLE IDNALD GEOSCIENCE 6-13-02 EL=20.1 SITE PLAN KEY DW. - DRYWELL LP - LEACHING POOL ST - SEPTIC TANK EP - EXPANSION POOL (10 (D Z O a 0a Historic u Tree Planted by early settlers Main Road SR #25 SITE PLAN SCALE: 1 "= 20' SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP #1000-18-5-5 KEY MAP SCALE 1"=200' GRASS OR, '� ncrete I a urb CONCRETE HANDICAP WALK 6" THK WITH WIRE FABRIC EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 8' CROSS SECnDN HANDICAP WALK DETAILS MLSC, 9R1WCW HIGH O/r cnrnnciUN JUINI NOTES t ALL LANES MUST BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC BEFORE 9 AM AND AFTER 3 PM NO LANE CLOSINGS ARE PERMITTED ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS NIGHTIME LANE CLOSINGS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE STATE PERMIT INSPECTOR. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS EXAMPLE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL AT SHOULDER WORK AREA ACCORDING TO FIGURE 302.9 OF THE N,Y.S,D,O,T MANUAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SCALE: N.T.S. SHOULDER WORK AREA NOTES: 1. SEE SECTIONS 234,10, 238.1, 238.4, 238.7, 254.2, 301.2, AND SUBCHAPTER G, 2. FOR TRANSITION LENGTH, L SEE SECTION 301.12 LEGEND FLAGGER OFLAG TREE WORK AREA A CONE DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PLAN 1, THIS SLOPE MAY BE REDUCED TO 1/4" / FT. AS NECESSARY FOR SMOTHER TRANSITIONS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES 2. THESE SURFACES SHALL BE GIVEN A SLIP RESISTANT TEXTURE, A COURSE BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO THE SIDEWALK SLOPE IS ACCEPTABLE, 3 REPAIR EXISTING SHOULDER, SIDEWALK AND CURBING AS ORDERED BY THE STATE ENGINEER 4, THE CONTARCTOR SHALL CLEAN THE EXISTING DRAIN BASINS ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE ROUTE 25 SITE FRONTAGE AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION 5, 1" REVEAL REQUIRED ITEM LIST FOR N.Y.S.D.O,T. REO. ITEM NO, DESCRIPTION 10608,0102 CONCRETE SIDEWALK — UNREINFORCED 10608.0103 CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS — CLASS F SCORE MARK FULL HEIGHT CURB �^ 4' SIDEWALK ------- ALK /4" /FT. 61 WIRE FABRIC- ITEM 106080103 DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION —� DRIVEWAY SECTION A - A SCAM N.T.S. 1„ NOTES: 1, DETAILS SHOW METHOD OF SLOPING AND CONSTRUCTING DRIVEWAY APRONS, � WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK IS NOT REQUIRED & "DIRT' DRIVEWAYS NOT SPECIFIED THE DRIVEWAY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF 3" OF ITEM 608.0201 AND to ofavement CONSTRUCTED TO THE LAYOUT AND SLOPES - 2 THE FIRST 5' FLAG OF SIDEWALK TO EIT ENO ROAD WORK 500't 3 0 0' V_ a z NO SHOULDER 9 0 N B00'2 SHOULDER WORK NOTES: TOTAL AREA = 12,148 S,F. OR 0.28 ACRES PARKING AREA = 4742 S.F. OR 39% LOT COVERAGE LANDSCAPING AREA 6036 S.F. OR 50% LOT COVERAGE EXISTING BUILDING AREA 1327 S.F. OR 11% COVERAGE ELEVATIONS REFERENCE SUFFOLK COUNTY TOPO MAPS SITE ZONING: B (GENERAL BUISNESS DISTRICT) PROJECT LIES BETWEEN MILE MARKERS 25-0704-1712 and 25-0704-1714 FLOODLIGHTS SHALL BE 150 WATT HALOGEN AND SHIELDED TO PROVIDE LIHGHT IN PARKING AREA ONLY. LOCATIONS AS SHOWN Rill IC PARIlIhI2 Gel rImi A7Hmma USE AREA # SPACES REQ'0 PER CODE SPACES PROVIOE01 RETAIL SPACE 572 S.F 1 SPACE/ 200 S,F. AREA 3 STORAGE SPACE 941 S,F 1 SPACE/ 1000 S.F. AREA 1 HANDICAP 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 5 BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO LOW CEILING HIEGHTS DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA: V=ARC ROOF V=1327 X 0.17 X 1 = 226 C.F. 226/42.24 FOR 8' DIA, RINGS = 6 V.L.F. REQUIRED 1-6' DEEP X 8' DIA. DRYWELL STONE PARKING AREA — V = 4742 X 0,17 X 0.6 = 484 C.F. CONCRETE HANDICAP PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK MAY 10 2005 V = 572 X 0.17 X 1 = 98 C.F. TOTAL PARKING AREA AND HANDICAP DRAINAGE 484 C.F. + 98 C.F. = 583 C.F. V = 533/42.24 FOR 8' DIA RINGS = 14' REQUIRED 8' DIA TOTAL DEPTH = 14' TOTAL REQUIRED 8' DIAMETER RING DEPTH 22' PROVIDE 3 - 8' DIA. X 7' DEEP AND 1-8' DIA. X 3' DEEP DRYWELLS HER sloE OF THE oRlvewnY ORYWELLS #1, #221NO #3 SHALL BE 7' DEEP SHALL BE 6" THICK, WIRE FABRIC REINFORCED (ITEM 10608.0103) AS SHOWN IN SECTION A -A DRYWELL #4 SHALL BE 3' DEEP exlsUng pcv't �w mo am ¢ m n w� SUBBASE in Item 17304,1011 OEw ZTEM 10403 0903 (FULL DEPTH) r vXPEL D„1,,- O DETAIL '9 MEETING EXIST. ASPHALT PAVT (NO RESURFACING) ITEM 10403.0903 SAW CUTTING ASPHALT /CONCRETE �2 BASE Item 402.378901M h Item 4023789011M u PARKING LOT SPECIFICATIONS 6" RCA SUBASE 2" STONE HANDICAP FAKING AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONCRETE AS SHOWN CONCRETE CURB HANDICAP PARKING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1-1998 TYPE A ITEM 10609,2801 N.T S. NOTE, THE END OF CURB NOT ABUTTING EXISTING CURB SHALL BE RAMPED DOWN TO ZERO HEIGHT REVEAL IN THE LAST 10 FEET AT LOCATIONS FACING TRAFFIC, SITE PLAN PREPARED 5-4-2005 SITE LOCATION: 2254 MAIN ROAD ORIENT, N.Y. 11957 OWNER: ROBERT EHRLICH P.O. BOX 326 SEACLIFF, N.Y. 11579 SCTM# 1000-18-5-5 Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 PHONE 369-2170 TITLE: DRY RETAIL BUILDING SITE PLAN sD 1000-18-5-5 SITE DRAWAIG NUMBER DATE: 5-0-05 SCALE: 1"=20'�SHHRT 1 OF 1 REV. A C 8 I 7 6 I 5 0 11 2 1 1 Gd 3 2 11 FIRST TOTALI SECOI B TOTP BASEMENT PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 528 SOFT CRAWLSPACE ATTIC FLOOR PLAN TOTAL FLOOR AREA 407 SOFT' Z STERAGE 377 SQET D C BUILDING FLOOR AREA USAGE FLOOR STORAGE RETAIL HSTAIRS H TOTAL 1ST FLOOR 132 572 221 925 2ND FLOOR 432 NONE 165 597 ATTIC 377 NONE 30 407 TOTAL SPACE 941 572 416 1929 NOTES: o 1. BASEMENT IS UNOCCUPIABLE SPACE DUE TO 6'-5" CEILING HIEGHT AND HEADERS WITH 5'-9" AND 6'-1" FLOOR CLEARANCE 2 BASEMENT FLOOR AREA 528 S.F. I N a -- vl J, MAY 1 0 2005 o °z A Michael Mapes,P.E. 163 PENINSULA PATH RIVERHEAD, NX 11901 L D, of New J-OP PHONE 369-2170 � M. �N * TITLE: ROBERT EHRLICH STORE RETAIL STORE FLOOR PLANS oYtlBtl� �r sD 1000-18-5-5 FLRPLN ' DFES6D A A ID� / DRAWNGNMME2 )roved DATE:4-15-05 S('dlp; W=1' SHEET I OF 1 2 1 A