Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-140.-3-37TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York Phone $16-765.1801 Southold, New York 11971 Date (~-/~~---.~ ~.~---- SITE PLAN Presub mission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub, conference} Application reviewed at work session (within 10 days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions' (within .30 days of review) Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination (~,~r SEQRA de~.er ruination k~ REFERRED TO: Zoning Board of Appeals (wri. tten comments within 60 days of request} Board of Trustees '~Building Department (certification) , Suffolk County Department of Planning ,~ Department of Transportation -State 'Department of Transportation - County Suffolk County Dept, of Health ~/Fire Commissioners RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval V//Healtl: approval Draimlge plan Reviewed by Engineer Sent: ~ - Received: Approval of site plan -with conditions Endorsement of sire'plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection One year review ,D Sou~hold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application Filing Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use x Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other Specify Name of Business or Site Saran Restaurant Location of Site Main Road, ~attituck Address of Site, if available Name of Applicant Mr. James Navas Address of Applicant P.O. Box 1220, Mattituck, New York 11952 Telephone 298-4378 Person to be responsible for Construction Telephone Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land x Under contract to purchase__ Owner 6f- Fee Title to Land Mr. James Navas Address P.O.Box 1220, ~at%ituck,N.Y. Telephone 298-4378 Site Plans Prepared by E.S.Kalo~eras,PELicense No. NY 042176 Address Union Square,RD1,Box530,Riverhe~l~lephone 727-5135 Total Land Area of Site 11,782 Existing Use of Site Restaurant Gross Floor Area. of Existing Structure(s) 2,200 sqft. Gross Floor Area. of Proposed Structure(s) sqft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 1~./ Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) 45.4 Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Datum(Specify)U.S.GoS. 15.0'm.s.1. Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals No Sq. Ft. Zone District HB Proposed Use o~ Site Restaurant sqft. sqft. % % % Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision ~xpiration Date " Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? No If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOAP~D. ~- ~ . 7 i~ li~ ' ~!~mffl. tO~ TOWN APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK James Navas beiDg d~ly.~wQ~D,~deposes and says that he resides at F.U. ~ox 1220, Mattl%ucK, N~ li~3z in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above propert or that he is tlhe of the {Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which, has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Sworn to before me this (Owner) 19 9/ (Partner ~rporate ~ffTcer and Title) .PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Proiect sponsor) 1. APPL{CANT/SPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME E.S. Kalogeras, P.E. I Saran Restaurant 3. PROJECT LOCATION: MunlclpaNty }{~ttitUCk County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent laRdmarks, elc., or provide map) Hain Road 244' west of Wickham Avenue SE 5. I$ PROPOSED ACTION; ~] New [] Expansion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BmEPLY: Reopen Existing [] Modfficaflonlarteraflon Saran Restaurant Existing 7. AMOUNT OF LAN AFFECTED' 0.~7 ' 0.27 Initially acres UIHmately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMRI.Y WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRiCTiONS? ~) Yes [] NO If NO, describe Pr/effy C 9. WHAT iS PRESENT LAND USE ~N 'VICINfTY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Induslrial ~] Commercial Describe: Various Hamlet Businesses [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMn' APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ~ Yes [] NO )! yes, list agency(s) and permiUapprovals NYS BP•ES and SCDHS 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] NO If yes, list agency name and permit/approval (_ AS A RESDLT OF PROFOSEO AC~ION WiLL EX,STING ~~ ~ .ERM,T,APPROVAL B~?U,RE M:7 DYe, ~No .-. I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TR~/~ T,~E I~ T~F: ,~ '~"DG5 ' *J ~ . If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a sta~, ~:omplete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 14,1991 PART II~ENVIRONMENT~i~Si-'SSMENT (To be completed by Aged A. DOES ACTION EXCEED A~PI[ I THRESHOLD iN 6 NYCRR, FART 617.127 If yes, coordinate the review process and-use the FULL EAF. [] Yes [] No *' ' S. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, FART 617.67 It No, a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, if legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existl~lg traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding probtems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeoh3glcal, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood characted? Explain brlefl~ C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: community's existing blahs or ,goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of laed or other natural resources? Explaltl briefly. C5. Growth, subsequent developme~,t, or related activities likely to be induced by the proDosed action? Explain briefly. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not Identified in CI-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, exph~in b~iefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF S~GNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverss effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed i~n connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that exblanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you hsve determined, .based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: w, -oo6 (Rev. 6/89) Notice No. . ~ Suffolk County Center Riverhead, New York 11901 516-548-3312 H.D. Ref. No. c/o - ?/- oo~-- Applicant ~-. T.M. Designation /~o~--/~o -3 -~/ Article VI & Article VII Zone [ ] Town ar~/or Village Zoning Letter [ [ ]/Cc~pletedA~.lication FonuWWM-004 (3 copies)[ [ d SEQRADetennination [ [ ] SPDES Fo~m [ ] SPDES Site Plan 8 1/2" x 11" [ [ ] SPDES Fee $50.00 $75.00 [ [ ] Monitoring/Sanpling Plan (8 1/2" x 11") [ ] Public Water/Sewer Availability Letter ] NYSDEC Wetlands Permit or Waiver ] Restrictive Covenants.. Art. 7 Other ] Processing Fee ] Denitrification Penmit Application ] Review Board Detennination [ ] Tax Map Designation ' [ [ ] Mates and Bounds Description [ [ ] Lot Size [ ] Deed Location [ [ ] Key Map [ ] Test Hole [ [ ] Gross Floor Ar~a of Building [ [ ] All Surface Waters with/n 300' [ [ ] Private Well Details and Location [ [ ] Neighboring Wells and Sewage Systems [ within 150' of Property [ [ ] Monitoring Well Detail mhd Location [ [ ] Latitude and Longitude Description ] Plans NOt Signed/Sealed ] Industrial Stabanen. t/Si.~g~ature ] Sewage Systsm Plan/Profile ] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge ] Sewage Disposal Design Calculations ] Insufficient Denitrification Details ] Public Water/Se~_r Line ] Expansion Area for Sewage Systems ] Site Statistics ] Capital Costs of Sanitary Syst~ or Capital Cost of Denitrification ] Operation and Maintenance Infonmation [ ] Project does not confom to Department star~mrds. °~c Notice of Non-Confon~ance. [ ] Plan review is beJ_dg coordinated with the following. Approval cannot be granted without their review and pennit issuance where applicable. [ ] Art. VII [ ] Art. XI! [ ] Water Quality [ ] Ecology [ ] DPW By~/~__~_ __ Date [ ~Oil Tanks 18-948..8189 I[II~ E. S. KAi..OGERAS, . ACEC Member Suppor~lg ExCellonce In Engineenog UNION SQUARE ONE UNION AVENUE RD #1 BOX 530 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 January 6, 1992 Re: Savan Re~~g Main Road'~hd Love Lane Mattituck, SCTM# 1000-140-3-37 Zoning ~st~: H~et Business (HB) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have recently received indication from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services that our application for a new sanitary disposal system for reopening the existing restaurant at the above referenced project will be given favorable consideration, subject to SEQRA declaration and some minor sanitary disposal system details. As you are aware, we had submitted for such declaration to you in October of 1991. Your response at that time was that a site plan review application was to be made. We did not submit it to you immediately, in hope of first receiving favorable Suffolk County Health Department Board of Review hearing determination, which we have recently obtained. Our client, Mr. James Navas, is anxious to proceed with implementation of a new sanitary disposal system (designed in conformance with current Health Department Standards) which was mandated by that regulatory body in order to reopen the existing restaurant. This new sanitary disposal sys.tem will be better capable of treating anticipated sewage flows as compared to the older septic disposal system. Since the existing restaurant is within the existing Historic District of Mattituck Hamlet, we are planning to maintain the site and building in the same rustic and rural setting it has occupied for' many decades. On-site parking is available for twenty (20) cars and at the design rate of 3/persons per car meets the anticipated restaurant usage of 60 patrons. The existing gravel drive and grass areas will be restored to equal or better condition following construction of the new sanitary disposal system and will continue to provide a rural and rustic setting for the existing restaurant. TEL: (516) 727-5135 / (516) 722-4040 FAX: (516) 722-5093 ':. S. KALOGERAS, ..~. Savan Restaurant Reopening....(Cont'd) Page 2. January 6, 1992 We are hopeful that a negative declaration can be determined as quickly as possible for our client's application, in order that the existing restaurant can be expeditiously reopened. If you have any questions or comments regarding this request and submission, please call us at your conw~nience. We therefore transmit herewith for your consideration a duly executed site plan application with attached money order of $205.00 to cover application fee, nine (9) copies of site plan (signed and sealed) showing proposed septic disposal system and other details, four (4) copies of certified site survey, one (1) copy of short environmental assessment form and one copy of current letter of review from Mr. Douglas Feldman of the SCDHS. Your expeditious review and declaration will be appreciated. Respectfully submi~tted, E.S. KALOGERAS, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ESK:ph cc: Mr. James Navas Mr. Douglas Feldman 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ~,;~,~, ~..~ ' ; ~P'urpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order / ject !'~or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy uen~- ~ v~ there are aspects of a project that are sub ective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine ~, slgmficance may have httle or no formal knowledge of the enwronment or may be techmcally expert m enwronmental i analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be, aware of the broader concerns affecting , the question of significance. ,'-'; The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination :~i'process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full E^F is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides obiective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions , laentify the Portions of EAF completed tor this project: ~] Part I [~ Part 2 r-IPart 3 _,~on review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Reopen Saran Restaurant & construct new sanitary disposal system to comply with SCDHS Name of Action Town of Southold Planning Board -Name of Lead Agency Print or Type N~me of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsibie Ofticer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha~,~ a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of t~e full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Reopen Saran Restaurant, Main Road, Mattituck, N.Y. & Coffstruct N~w Sanitary System LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Main Road w/o Wickham Avenue, Mattituck, New York NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR E.S. Kalogeras, P.E. ADDRESS Union Square, One Union Avenue, RD~I, Box 530 CITY/PO Riverhead NAME OF OWNER (If different) Mr. James Navas ADDRESS P.O. Box 1220 CrTWPO DESCRIPTION OF ACTION BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 727--5135 STATE ZiP CODE N.Y. 11901 BUSlNESSTELEPHONE (516) 852-8090 STATE ZIP CODE N.Y. 11952 Reopen existing Saran Restaurant and construct new sanitary disposal system in accordance with SCDHS requirements and Board of Review (SCDHS) waiver of density sewage loading per acre. Please Complete Each Questions Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ~lUrban 1-11ndustrial ~Commercial [~Residential (suburban) []Rural {non-farm) [~Forest I-IAgriculture DOther 2 Total acreage of project area: 0.27 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) O. 22 acres O. 27 acres Roads, buildings and other p~ved surfaces 0.05 · acres 0.05 acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Sand and Gravel a. Soil drainage: fqWe]l drained 100 % of site [DModerately well drained % of site []Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, bow many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System~ acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? I-lyes [~No a. What is depth to bedrock? 1500__+ (in feet) 2 ~ kpproxi,mate pe~rcentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~[~0-10% 10C) % E10-15% % E15% or % Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the National ~egisters of Historic Places? i-lYes [~No spr" ct substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes ~No whai. ,s the depth of the water table? __l? (in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aq?ifer? {~Yes ENo Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r-lYes ~No 'Does proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or enda~lgered? O'Yes 1[~] No According to Identify each species Are there, any unique or unusual land torres on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) EYes ;il]No Describe Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I~Yes J~No If yes, explain Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? 0-1Yes ;~]No Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: 'a. Name 1200 feet from IDng Creek Is the site served by existing public utilities? OYes I~No a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) es, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? b. Size (In acres) [:3Yes ENo OYes E3No Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r~Yes [~No Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 k-lYes E]No Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes E~No Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0.2'7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: n/a acres initially; n/a acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped -n/a acres. (0.27 acres developed & existing) d Length of proiect, in miles: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; ' f Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ ; proposed 0 g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 10 · (upon completion of project)? h If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially t ~atelv existino i 13~mensions (in feet) of largest~structure 30 height; 31.5 width; 120 length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 45 ft 3 2~ How much natural material (i.e., ro arth, 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? dyes gNo [N/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes [No c. Will upper subsoil be s~ockpiled for reclamation? I-lyes []No etc.) will be removed from the site? '~? ~'¥ tons/cubic yards RoEtore gravel p~rw~ng Area year. (including demolition). year. 4. How many acres of vegetationt (trees, shr.ubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.1 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? []Yes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 m~n~h months, (including demolition), 7 If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of comrnencement phase I month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? []Yes I--INo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? E~Yes f~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~ ; after project is complete 6 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? I-IVes ~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? r']Yes I~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount ...... b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged *3. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [~Yes [~No TypeRp-.ra0'~ lqSC) ~ ~4. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal.~ r-lYes :~No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? E]Yes [~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? J~]Yes. []No a. If yes, what is the amount per month 5 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? J~]Yes f-INo c. If yes, give name ToWn of Southold Landfill ; location Southold, N.Y. d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? I~Yes e If Yes, explain ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a, If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I'-lYes [Yes J~]No tons/month. years, 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes 'F'INo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I-lYes EqNo 21, Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? ~Yes f-INo If yes , indicate type(s) Heating,Ventilating, Air Conditioning,Lighting,Cooking, Etc. "2 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 13 gallons/minute. z], Total anticipated water usage per day ?,0~ gallons/day. 24 IIoe~ project involve Local, State or Federal funding? I-JYes ~]No 1! Yes, explain 25: Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board "y, Town, Village Planning Board Lily, Town 7onmg Board City, County Health I~epartment ' Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies [~Yes [~No ]~g Yes I-INo ~Yes (~No ~]Yes I-INo ~]Yes ~]Yes [~No ~(~ Yes ~No EYes (~No Type SEQR Determina%ion Art.6 & Board of Review Art.6 & Board of Review SPDES Permi% NYSDEC Submittal Date Oct.30,1991 Aug. 6,1991 Aug. 6,1991 Auq. 6,1991 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~]Yes C1No If Yes, indicate decision required: E]zoning amendment E]zoning variance f~special use permit E]subdivision Dsite plan I-lnew/revision of master plan E]resource management plan ~lother SEQR Determination 2. What is the zoning classification[s)of the site? Bu.$inese 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Existinq R~staurant of 2,200 sf 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? n/a 5.'What is the maximum Potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? · Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? E~Yes , What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ,,4 mile radius of proposed action? Business & Residential r-lNo 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining~surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? :{:3Yes I'qNo 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? n/a 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? r-lyes ;[[]No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protection)? E]Yes I~INo a If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? g'~es E}No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? E3Yes I~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes E]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measure~ ~hich you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge olicant/Sponsor~Lame ~E.~f~[~'eras, P.E., Consultinq Enqineer Date Oct. 30,1991 51gnature If the action is in the Coastal Area, ~'d you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibilily of Lead Agency ' eneral Information (Read Carefully) * In completin8 the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasenable! The reviewer is not expected to he an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will he potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significanL Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpty asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for an,,' specific project br site oth~'r examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instruclions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2 If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ,~NO [-]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 [] foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [] 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ~-] · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ~ 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove~ more than 1,000 [] tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill, [] · Construction in a designated floodway. [] Other impacts [] I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By. Impact Impact Project Change [] ['~Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] [:~Yes '[]No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No' [] []Yes []No [] []yes~ 2. Will there be an effect t~..,.~y unique or unusual land,forums found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc. TJi~NO E~YES · Specific land forms: [] [] C'~Yes []No 6 IMPACT ON WA~ 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conserva~on Law, ECL) /,1~O E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains, a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. . · Extension of utility distribution facillities through a protected water body. · Construction in ,~ designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: Moderati~' Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes []No f-lYes []No I-lYes []NO []Yes []No []Yes []No 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water.~ '~rNO E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water [] or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. [] · Other impacts: [] 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? E]NO ~'YES ,Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity, · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adver?ly affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyec~ off the site to facilities whi~-h presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely existing body' of watcr [,, tile e,:~'nt that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · PropoSed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or, storage facilities. · Other impacts: ,~[~/-~/~ Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? ~O ~YES Ex:.nples that would apply to column 2 · Propc.scd Action would change flood water flows 7 []Yes []No []Yes []No C~Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No ~Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No ~Yes F1No []Yes []No []Yes ~,'No []Yes []No []Yes I'-I No ~-]Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow deveh)pment in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes f"'JNo []Yes r-~No [~]Yes I--INo []Yes I-1No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ,~NO (~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 ,, · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [~]Yes []Yes [~No J--]Yes []No [~Yes []No [~Yes [~No I-lYes i'"'lNo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ~'NO r~yEs Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []Yes []No ' []Yes [~]No []Yes []No l-lYes {~]No 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? [-INO E~YES Examples that would apply ~0 column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish. shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources;~ Examples that would apply to column 2 ' ~,.O I-IyES · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to a~ricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) [] [] []Yes []No []Yes I-1No []Yes []No ~onstruction activity would .excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ~ of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more ~ than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. ~ · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural :~ ~ land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, ~? ~ strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (ag. cause a farm ~, field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) k · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ~NO r~YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in~Jection 617.21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether re.an-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · ~ject components that will result in the elimination or significant ...reening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure off, historic, pre- historic or paleontolol~ical importance? .~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantialK contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places· · Any impact to an archaeological sit(! or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or ~'~ future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ~NO ~YES · permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity · A.maior reduction of an open space important to the community, · Other impacts 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 3 I Can Impact Be ' Mitigated By Project Change r'~Yes I--INo ['"'~Yes []No []Y~s [-]No [-]Yes []No []Yes ~No E~Yes ~]No E~Yes [-]No ~Yes I-]No ~Yes ~No []Yes ~]No i'-IYes [~No I-lyes ~]No ~,'es []No I--lYes C'iNo 1 2 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small 'to Potential 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation sy~ste;ms? Moderate Large ~YI~S Impact Impact Examples ~hat would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. [] [] · Proposed Ac,".ion will result in major traffic problems. [~) [] · Other impac,".s: [~. [] 3 Can Impact B, Mitigated By Project Chang~ [~Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will prop¢,:,ed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy suf3.'ply~ .~NO EYES Examples r:hat would apply to column 2 · Proposed Act.~on will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of [] any form of emergy in the municipality. · Proposed Acc.,on will require the creation or extension of an energy [] transmission c,, supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impact, s: [] []Yes []No []Yes []No C'~Yes []No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there !be objectionable odors, noise, or vibratio~ as a result of the Proposed ^ctioni' ,~NO E~YES Examples th,~t would apply to column 2 · Blasting withun 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] facility. · Odors will ocmur routinely (more than one hour per day). [] · Proposed Act,,on will produce operating noise exceeding the local [] ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Act~ion will remove natural harriers that would act as a [] noise screen. · Other impacts: [] []Yes []No []Yes []No []Yes []No [~Yes []/'do []Yes []No IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will ProposEd Action affect public health and safe~,~O [~YES Examples th,at would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous [] substances (i.e oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, ~tc.) in the event of accident or u~set conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or e~-nission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any [] form (i.e. tox[~c, poisonous, high}y reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc-] · Storage faci/iti~es for one million or more gallons of liquified natural [] gas or other ftammable liquids, · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance [] within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous . waste. · Other impacts:: [] 10 []Yes []No ~Yes []Yes []Yes []Yes 1 2 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER SmaU to PotentiM OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Will proposed action affect the character of the existin~ community? /~.NO E]YES Impact Impact Examples that would apply to column 2 ~"': · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ~ project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. ;;~ · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ;',;rwill increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. ~: · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ? · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. '> · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures · ' or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [e,g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change 19 Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to adverse environmental impacts? .~NO ~YES potential If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by proiect change{s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imporlanl. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known obiections to the project relate to this impact. ontinue on attachments) 11 ~© I 0 Z Z ~ U PLANNING BOARD M~MBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, ,TR. RICHARD G. WARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 17, 1997 Andrew W. Miles Attorney At Law 250 Montauk Highway East Moriches, NY 11940 RE: Savans Restaurant Main Road, Mattituck SCTM# 1000140,-3-37 Dear Mr. Miles, The Planning Board has received your letter of July 9, 1997, concerning a proposed use for the above vacant property. In your letter you refer to the proposed use as a bar/restaurant, please be advised that while a restaurant use is permitted as of right; a bar or drinking establishment use must obtain a Special Exception from the Board of Appeals in this Hamlet Business District before this Board can give any possible final site plan approval to your proposal. The Board has a pending application on this property and would recommend that you get in touch with the owner to see if you can get permission to continue with his application. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. ~ . Kas'ner Site Plan Reviewer MILES ILLARD ATTORNEYS AT LAW Andrew W. Miles Patricia N. Gillard 250 Montau~< Highway East Moriches, New York 11940 [516] 878-3352 * fax [516) 878-5685 Of Counsel' Tara B, Lillis, Esq,, Joseph T Lee, Esq July 9, 1997 Mr. Bennett Orlowski Chairman, Planning Board Town Hall Main Street Southold, New York 11971 Re: Sarans, Main Road, Mattituck, New York Dear Mr. Orlowski.: Please be ad.vised that this office represents Verna King who is interested in the possibility of purchasing the property that was once known as "Savans" on Main Street in Mattituck. Pursuant to the recommendation of the building department, I am hereby requesting confirmation that the property, if purchased by my client, can be used as a bar/restaurant facility. I understand, that certain modifications will need to be made to the septic system. In addition to confirming its proposed use, I would appreciate it if you would inform me as to whether any additional upgrades or modifications will be necessary for the proposed use. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, cc. Verna King MILES AND GILLARD BY: ANDREW W. MILES SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Satellite Office, Commack, New York FAX Message This Facsinfile was sent using the Complete Communicator for Windows Version 3.0 Date: 01 19 93 To: Bennett Or!owski, Jr. SOUIHOLD IOVCN PLANNING BOARD Title: Chairman Company: Town of Southo!d Plmming Board Fax Phone Number: 765-1822; From: E.S. 1,~alogeras, P.E., (onsulttn, Engineer Subject. Sax an Restaurant, Mattittick, SCTM 1000-[ 40-3-37 # of Pages (inch[ding this cover sheet): 1 Memo Dear Bennett: In response to your letter of January 4th, 1993, we have spoken to our client amt hc has g~ven us instructions to keep our file open on this project. Thc economy set,ns to be delaying speedy continnation of the proposed work on this project. Hope this ansxvers your recent query as to lhe sta,us of th~s project. Rcspectlitlly, s/Lou Kalogeras, P.E. If you do not receive all pages, please call back immediately. VOICE: (5165 727-5135 or 722.,4040 FAX: (5165 722-5093 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 January 4, 1993 E. $. Kalogeras, P.E. Union Square, One Union Avenue RD# 1 Box 530 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Savan Restaurant Main Road & Love Lane Mattituck Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) SCTM# 1000-140-3-37 Dear Mr. Kalogeras: The Planning Board has not received any correspondence from you regarding the above referenced project since your letter of January 27, 1992. The Board would like to know the status of this project. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Chairman cc: Douglas Feldman, Suffolk County Department of Health Services PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone 1516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 17, 1992 SCO'IT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1t79 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 E. S. Kalogeras, P.E. Consulting Engineer One Union Avenue RD#I Box 530 Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Site Plan for Savan Restaurant SCTM91000-140-3-37 Dear Mr. Kalogeras: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 16, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, J~. /;~ Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone I516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOWl' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance March 16, 1992 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site plan for Savan Restaurant SCTM#: 1000-140-3-37 Location: Main Road, Mattituck SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Description of Action: Reopening existing restaurant. Yes ( ) No (X) Page 2 Savan Restaurant SEQR Negative Declaration Con't. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment has been submitted and reviewed and it has been determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specifications, subsurface soil conditions, and site details will be reviewed fully at the time of Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) application review. This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS) and the required obtainment of relevant permits. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The project involves reopening an existing restaurant on a 11,782 square foot site. The site and area are zoned for restaurant use by the Town of Southold, thus the proposed action is consistent with zoning. A review of tlhe proposed site plan by the Principal Building Inspector resulted in a recommendation that the two existing cesspools must be pumped and removed to the Town Landfill. The applicant has agreed to this condition. For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 CC: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Robert Green, NYSDEC Stony Brook Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Building Department Southold Zoning Board of Appeals Applicant PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (,516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax ~516) 765-1823 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh° E nclese~ please find (2)surveys for ~f~ ~ Please notify this office as to whether any firewel~s are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please redly .by~ ~ 199~ Thank you for your cooperation. · enc. Mr. Bennett~Orlowski, Chairman The Board that there is sufficient ,4ater supply f. or fire pro~tec~n in th~ area of property and contend that.no, further fire well~~ - For %he Board of Fire Commissionera / Uohn ~. ~mmqh~ ~_t~-. ' of Fire Commissioners of the M~ttituek Fire District have determine[ this JAMES A. KUZLOSKI REGIONAL DIRECTOR February 18, 1992 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 FRANKLIN E. WHITE COMMISSIONER Mr. Bennett Orlowski, .fr. Chairman Planning Board Office Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have reviewed the site plan for reopening the Saran Restaurant that you submitted February 4, 1992 and have the following comments: We have no project in our 5 year program to work in the area of NY25 west of Wickham Avenue. 2. Any changes to the NY25 Access will require a permit from our Traffic Engineering and Safety group. 3. This Departmdnt has no interest in becoming lead agent for this action. Thank you for advising us of actions that affect State Highways. Very truly yours, QHN A. FALOTICO Planning & Program Management Director SoUTHOtO ToWN PLANNING ROARD AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT/ON EMPLOYER PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Richard G, Ward Mark S. McDonald KeNneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTF L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5[6) 765-1823 John A. Keogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 Dear Mr. Keogh: Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply ~y~j ~ 199~ Thank you for your cooperation. ' Bennett Orlowski, j~. ' Chairman enc. RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JAMES A. RICIITER ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 765-3070 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Bennett Orlowpki, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board James A. Rickter SUBJECT: DATE: Short Environmental Assessment Forms As per your request, enclosed please find the short environmental assessment forms for the above referenced projects. Please be advised that Part III of this form still requires your signature and related information. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. eric. ' SOUTHOLD PLAt'ININ(~, .C, ·, I' .PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORM,ATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANTISPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME E.S. Kalogeras, P.E. Savor Restaurant 3. PROJECT LOCAI'~ON: MunlcID~llty Mattituck County Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map} Main Road 244' west of Wickham Avenue SEQF 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Exr)anslon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Reopen Existing Saran Restaurant Existing AND AFFECTED: ?' AMOUNT OF ~ . 27 0.27 InitialW acres Ultimately acres 8. WiLL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXIST~NG LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial ~] Commercial Various Hamlet Businesses [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Ofher tO. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ~ Yes [] No I! yes. list agency(s) and permit/approva;s NYS SPDES and SCDHS DOES ANy ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] No If yes, Iisi agency name and permdlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACT ON W LL EXIST NG PERMITIAPPROVAL REOU RE I CERTIFY THAT THE 'NFORMATiON PROVIO~D AaOVE IS TR~; T~ ~E If the action i's in the Coastal Area, and you are a ~~omplele the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 1~,1991 ~Yes [] No C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brleff~ NO C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, signiticant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing prans or goals as of flcially adopted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. C5. Growth, suDsequent development, or related activilies likely to be induced by the proposed actiotl? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term. cumulative, or other effects not idenhfied in Ct-C5? Explain brieNy. C?. Other impacts (including changes in use of either quanhty or type el energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE. OR IS THERE [] Yes LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) iNSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its {a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. '"~Check this box il you have determined, .based on the information and analysis above and any supporting / "documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF soUTHOLD John A. ~ogh, Secretary Mattituck Fire District Pike Street Mattituck, New York 11952 SCOTI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Dear Mr. Keogh: -- ~ Enclose~ please find (2)surveys f~r Please notify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whetker shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply ~ ~ , 199~ Thank you for your cooperation. Chairman enc. RAYMOND L. JACOBS SUPERINTENDENT OF HIGHWAYS 765-3140 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD JAMES A. RICIITER ENGINEERING INSPECTOR 765-3070 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Bennett Orlowpk~, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board James A. Richter SUBJECT: DATE: Short Enviroumeutal Assessment Forms I As per your request, enclosed please find the short environmental assessment forms for the above referenced projects. Please be advised that Part III of this form still requires your signature and related information. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. erie, FEB - 6 t992 SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING ·· I' ,PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO'RM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR I 2. PROJECT NAME E.S. Kalogeras, I?.E. I Savan Restaurant 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munlcloallty Mattituck Counly Suffolk 4. PRECISE LOCATION (S~reet address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, elc., o¢ provide map) Main Road 244' west of Wickham Avenue SEQ,~ 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [~] Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Reopen Existing Saran Restaurant Existing AMOUNT OF ND AFFECTED' 7. u ~.27 ' 0.27 Initially mci'es GItimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~] Yes [] No If No, describe brielly g. WRAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN 'VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Industrial ~ Commercial DescnDe: Various Hamlet Businesses [] Agriculture [] Park/Forest/Open space [] Other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ~ Yes [] No If yes, list agency(s) and permiUapprovals NYS SPDES and SCDHS ! 1. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] NO If yeu, Iisi agency name and permit/approval t2. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE [~Yes [~No '""' 'CER'E THAT THE'NPORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS I/ OVER 1 14,1991 PART II--ENVIRONMENT~i~SMENT~ (To be completed by Agerj~ A. DOES ACTION EXCEED AN~I"I~ ~ESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, FART 617.127 If ~Jpale Ihe rewew process and u~e Ihe FULL EAF. e. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, FART 617.67 If No, a negative declaration ay be superseded by another involved agency. n~Yes [] NO C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANy ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten. If legible) CI. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater qualify or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste Production or disposal, potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: kid C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archa,eoIoglcal, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C,4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. C5. Growlh, subsequent development, or related activities likely to De induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cUmulalive, or other effects no{ identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts (nc ud ng changes in use at either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility; (e) ~eocJraphic scope; ancl (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that expia, nations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been idenfified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY .,.._.v occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. · /,~heck this box if you have determined, .based on the information and analysis above and any supporting Uocumentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mack S. McDonald Kenneth L Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOT]' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 February 4, 1992 E. S. Kalogeras Consulting Engineer One Union Avenue RD #1 Box 530 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Savan Restaurant Main Road and Love Lane SC2~$ 1000-140-3-37 Dear Mr. Kalogeras: The followin~ resolution was duly adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 3, 1992. BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality review Act, start the coordination process on this unlisted action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ri~:chie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Feb. 4, 19 92 RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Proposed site plan for Savan Restaurant Main ~d., M~tLltuck $CTM #1000-140_3_37 Requested Action: ReoDenin~ existinq restaurant SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X ) Unlisted Robert G. Kassner Contact Person: (516)-765-1938 The lead ,agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project, within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below). Comments: Please feel. free to contact this office for further information. Sincerely, f~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman ~ cc: ~Board~-of~eals ~o~rd-of-~-r~st~es ~ Building'Department Southold Town Board ~ Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook NYSDEC - Albany F~C~--Dept, o~-Public Works .3j~ A~my--CGPp-o~Engineers f N.Y.S. Dept. of Transportation * Maps are enclosed for your.{cview Coordinating agencies , PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'FI' L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: James Richter, Road Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairma~ Review of Short Environmental Assessment Form Proposed site plan for Savan Restaurant Main Read, Mattituck Mattituck SCTM# ].000-140-3-37 DATE: February 5, 1992 Please complete part two of the attached SEAF. If you have any questions, please contact Robert Kassner of this office. Enc. cc: Raymond Jacobs, Highway Superintendent ' 14-16.4 (2/87%~Text 12 I..PROJECT I.O. NUMBER 617,21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME E.S. Kalogeras, P.E. Saran Restaurant $. PROJECT LOCATION; Municipality Mattituck County Suffolk 4. PRECJSE LOCATION (Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, elc,. or provide map) Main Road 244' west of Wickham Avenue SEQ 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Modlficationlalteratlo. 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Reopen Existing Savan Restaurant Existing 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED' 0.27 * 0.27 S. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ~] Yes [] No If No, d~)scribe briefly 9, WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN 'VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [] Induslrial ~] Commercial Various Hamlet Businesses [] ParklforestlOpen space [] Other DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL}? ~] Yes [] No If )'es. list agency(s) and permitiapproval$ N¥S SPDES and SCDHS ll. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACT:ON HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes [] NO If y6u. list agency name and permit/approval t2. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE [] Ye, ~ .o I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TR AppNcanUsponsor name: E.S. Kalogera/s, P.E. If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a stalL~, complete Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 .EDGE NOV · the 14,1991 PART II--ENVtRONMEN To be completed by Age~ A. DOES ACTION E-XCEED A 6 NYCRR, PART 611,127 tr~e review process and use the FULL EAF. [] Ye, [] NO "' B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.67 It NO, a negative declaration may be superseded by armother involved agency. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly:. C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, sheUfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened o~ endangered species? Explain brJefly: Growth, subsequent developn~ent, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identdied in C1-C57 Expiairm briefly. C?. Othe~ impacts (incJudirmg changes in use of either q~Janhty or type of energy)? Explain briefly. O. iS THERE, OR iS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] NO If Yes, eXlDlain brJetly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, impontant or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c} duration; (d) itreversibilily; (e) geograprmic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to :;how that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more Potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed diracUy to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ~] Check this box if you have determined..based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: UNION SOUARE, ONE UNION AV~E' RO #1 BOX 530, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK t1901 TEL: (516) 797-5135 / {516) 722.4040 . FAX (516) 722 5093 E. S. KALOGERAS, ACEC Member Sut~t~ Excellence :NUE RD #1 BOX 530 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 January 27, 1992 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Savan Restaurant Reopening Main Road and Love Lane Mattituck, SCTM# 1000-140-3-37 Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We are in receipt of your letter of January 22, 1992 and herewith submit a check in the amount of $150.00 to replace our original check which you returned. In addition, we enclose herewith nine (9) copies of site plan redrawn to a scale of 1"=20' with details and calculations of parking spaces and your other comments shown thereon. Please be advised that the existing sign shall remain as well as the existing outdoor lighting. The existing outdoor lighting consists of building-mounted incandescent lanterns or lights on the exterior walls. If you need any additional information on this matter, please call us at your convenience. Thank you, in advance, for your expeditious consideration on this matter. ESK:ph cc: Mr. James Navas TEL: (516) 727-5135 / (516) 722-4040 Respectfully submitted, E.S. KALOGERAS, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER FAX: (516) 7~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York I 1971 Fax (516) 765-1823 January 22, 1992 E. S. Kalogeras Consulting Engineer One Union Avenue RD ~1 Box 530 Riverhead, NY 11901 RE: Savan Restaurant Main Road and Love Lane Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) SCTM9 1000-140-3-37 Dear Mr. Kalogeras: The Planning Board has received your letter of January 6, 1992. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed: 1. Show any proposed outdoor lighting details. Provide sketch of proposed sign if it will be different from the existing sign~ 3. Owners name and address must be shown. 4. Zoning District must be shown. Parking calculations and the location of the actual spaces must be indicated.~ 6. The scale of the site plan must be 1" = 20' Page 2 Savan Restaurant The amount of the check should be one hundred fifty.dollars ($150), instead of the two hundred and five dollars ($205) sent with the application. Accordingly, your check is enclosed. The Board will proceed with its review upon receipt of the above. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. -- Chairman Encl. ($205.00 check) PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latharn, Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD scowr L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Site Plan for Savan Restaurant Main Road & Love Lane Mattituck SCTM# 1000-140-3-37 December 11, 1991 The attached Planning Board letter requests a site plan from Mr. Kalogeras in response to his request for a SEQRA determination by the Board in order to reopen his restaurant. The Board has not heard from Mr. Kalogeras as to the status of this project. Has the Building Department received any requests for permits or other related activity? PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman George Ritchie Latham. Jr. Richard G. Ward Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SCO'I'F L. HARRIS Supervisor Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fa~ (516) 765-1823 E. S. Kalogeras, P.E. Union Square, One Union Avenue RD~ 1 Box 530 Riverhead, NY 111901 November 1, 1991 RE: Savan Restaurant Main Road & Love Lane Mattituck Zoning District: Hamlet Business SCTMg 1000-140-3-37 Dear Mr. Kalogeras: The Planning Board has received your letter dated October 30, 1991, requestinq a State Environmental Quality Review Act declaration be issued for the above referenced property. The Board cannot issue a SEQRA declaration without a site plan application. Enclosed for your use is a site plan application. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. cc: Douglas Feldman, Services Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ' Chairman Suffolk County Department of Health UNION SQUARE~ YEN ,~RD #1 BOX 530, R VERHEAD NEW~¥ORI~ I 1~01 TEL:(516) 727.5135J (516)~'4040 ; F~,X 5'16) 722-5093 Southold, New York 11971 530 °^~October 30, 1991 IJ°" "°'JN 91-1 Saran Restaurant Main Road w/o Wickham Avenue Mattituck, New York WE ARE SENDING YOU E~ Attached [] Under separate cover viaHand Delivery the following items: [] Shop drawings [] Prints ;~ Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter El Change order ;E] SEOR Determination a,~ f,P~d aOnn~y coP,~s O^T~ NO. 3 10/30/91 Part 1 & 2 SEQR Determination w/Prop. Plans of Sanitary Disposal ~ System in Conjunction with reopening Savan Restaurant THESE ARE TR~MI~ED as checknet: . .o.,e.,o....rova, ~ For your us~ .~/~ Ap~oved as not~ ~ Submit copies for distribution ~ As requested ~ Returned for corrections ~ Return cormct~ prints ~ For review and comment ~ FOR BIDS DUE 19__ ~ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Kindly send your determination to the undersized with a coDY to ~. ~uq Fel~an of the S~HS Wastewater Manag~ent Section as quickly as possible. A negative declaration will be very helpful to ~. J~es Navas in his effort t~ get aDpro~l COPY TO SIGN ED~~--~ ~] .UN-ITI~D STATES POSTAL MONEY ORDER ~, 45702284117 911214 119520 .,205*00 E. $. KALOGERAS, x ACEC Member Suppo,gng Ezce#ence In Enginee#ng UNION SQUARE ONE UNION AVENUE RD #1 BOX 530 RIVERHEAD, NY 11901 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman, Planning Board Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 January 6, 1992 Re: SMamv. nanRcR~a~ Mattituck, SCTM# 1000-140-3-37 Zoning District: Hamlet Business (HB) Dear Mr. Orlowski: We have recently received indication from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services that our application for a new sanitary disposal system for reopening the existing restaurant at the above referenced project will be given favorable consideration, subject to SEQRA declaration and some minor sanitary disposal system details. As you are aware, we had submitted for such declaration to you in October of 1991. Your response at that time was that a site plan review application was to be made. We did not submit it to you immediately, in hope of first receiving favorable Suffolk County Health Department Board of Review hearing determination, which we have recently obtained. Our client, Mr. James Navas, is anxious to proceed with implementation of a new sanitary disposal system (designed in conformance with current Health Department Standards) which was mandated by that regulatory body in order to reopen the existing restaurant. This new sanitary disposal system will be better capable of treating anticipated sewage flows as compared to the older septic disposal system. Since the existing restaurant is within the existing Historic District of Mattituck Hamlet, we are planning to maintain the site and building in the same rustic and rural setting it has occupied for many decades. On-site parking is available for twenty (20) cars and at the design rate of 3/persons per car meets the anticipated restaurant usage of 60 patrons. The existing gravel drive and grass areas will be restored to equal or better condition following construction of the new sanitary disposal system and will continue to provide a rural and rustic setting for the existing restaurant. TEL: (516) 727-5135 / (516) 722-4040 FAX: (516) 722-5093 E. $. KALOGERAS, ~.~. ACEC Member Suppor~h~l Excellence In Engl~oencx2 Savan Restaurant Reopening....(Cont'd) Page 2. January 6, 1992 We are hopeful that a negative declaration can be determined as quickly as possible for our client's application, in order that the existing restaurant can be expeditiously reopened. If you have any questions or comments regarding this request and submission, please call us at your convenience. We therefore transmit herewith for your consideration a duly executed site plan application with attached money order of $205.00 to cover application fee, nine (9) copies of site plan (signed and sealed) showing proposed septic disposal system and other details, four (4) copies of certified site survey, one (1) copy of short environmental assessment form and one copy of current letter of review from Mr. Douglas Feldman of the SCDHS. Your expeditious review and declaration will be appreciated. Respectfully submitted, E.S. KALOGERAS, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER ESK:ph cc: Mr. James Navas Mr. Douglas Feldman E. S. KALOGERAS, P.' ~ ~~ RI~I, Box 530 RIVERHEAD. NEW YORK 11901 (516) 727-5135 FAX (516) 369-2009 TO Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: Saran Restaurant Main Road w/o WickhamAvenue Mattituck, New York WE ARE SENDING YOU [] Attached ~ Under separate cover viaHand Delivery the following items: [] Shop drawings [] Prints ~ Plans [] Samples [] Specifications [] Copy of letter [] Change order ~] SEOR Determination as T~=;~ Ag~y COPIES DATE 3 10/30/91 NO. DESCRIPT;ON Part 1 & 2 SEQR Determination w/Prop. Plans of Sanitary Disposal System in Conjunction with reopening Savan Restaurant THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval [] Approved as submitted [] Resubmit copies for approval [] For your use [] Approved as noted [] Submit__copies for distribution [] As requested [] Returned for corrections [] Return corrected prints [] For review and comment ~ Determination of Significance for Type 1 or Unlisted Actions [] FOR BIDS DUE 19 [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Kindly send your dete]nnination to the undersigned with a copy to Mr. Doug Feldznan of the SCDHS Wastewater Management Section as quickly as possible. A negative declaration ~et F~C'[%q~, ~, ~ -- approval will be very helpful to Mr. James Navas in his effort to ~ ~w for his existing building. I~ ~%~lil' -'%PY TO LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Incomplete Project Type: Site Plans Status: Application SCTM #: 1000 - 140.-:3-37 Project Name: Savans Restaurant Address: NYS Route 25 Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: James Navas Owner Name: James Navas Zone 1: HB Approval Date: /,/'CF- t~/:~v~ OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A (late indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: Zone 2: Location: NYS Route 215 SC Filina Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Aareement: Zone 3: SCANNED MAR 2 7 2006 Records Management SCAN Date: