HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-07/11/1974 SOUTHOLD, L. I., N.Y. 119~71
Telephone 765-~dd0
APPEAL BOARD
MEMBER
Robert W. Oillisl~ie, Jr., Chairman
Robert Bergen
Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Serse Doyen, Jr.
Fred Hulse, Jr.
MINUTES
Southold Town Board of Appeals
July 11, 1974
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals
was held at 7:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Thursday, July 11, 1974,
at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York.
There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr.,
Chairman; Robert Bergen; Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Absent: Messrs: Fred Hulse, Jr. and Serge Doyen, Jr.
THE CHAIRMAN: The hearing on Appeal No. 1901, applica-
tion of Paul & Jacqueline Kelly, w~ich was originally
scheduled for May 23rd, 1974, was postponed by resolution
of the Board, in the absence of Judge Kelly, until 7:30 P.M.
tonight.
7:50 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) upon application of Pa~l and
Jacqueline Kelly, 101 Wallace Street, Freeport, New York,
for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission
to divide property with insufficient width and area. Lo-
cation of property: N/S Private Road, W/S Camp Mineola Road,
Mattituck, bounded north by Folly Beach Ltd. and Allen;
east by B. Snyder; south by Private Road; west by B. Hart.
Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the legal
notice of hearing, the application for a variance, affidavits
attesting to its publication in the official newspapers, and
notice to the applicant.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -2-
July 11, 1974
THE CHAIRMAN: According to the Van Tuyl survey submitted
the applicant would have 14,450 sq. ft. on the westerly side
of the proposed division and 13,983 sq. ft. on the easterly
side.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
DANIEL L. STEVENSON, ESQ.: I am an attorney with the
firm of Rogers & Stevenson in Patchogue, N. Y. I am appearing
here with Judge Kelly. ThenJudge was unable to be here for
the original hearing because of illness.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there any other information that you
wish to give. The character of the area is a determining
factor.
MR. STEVENSON: The majority of the surrounding lots
are on 50 foot or 60 foot frontage. It is 100 feet from
the water. The Judge has been a summer resident for years.
The property was purchased in 1958.
THE CHAIRMAN: What is Folly Beach?
JUDGE KELLY: That's an area of meadowland that was
filled in by the County. They dredged it. It's a vacant
area. Peter Kreh & Edmonds Allen own it, separately. They
are not partners. Strong's Mattituck Marina is behind it.
The creek is to the west.
THE CHAIRMAN: So this is on the easterly end of the
right of way.
JUDGE KELLY: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: How is the water supplied down there?
JUDGE KELLY: We get our water from a well on Judge
Howell's property. We pipe it down. Every piece of
property there is 50 feet wide.
THE CHAIRMAN: What is your elevation?
JUDGE KELLY: The same as everyone else. There is one
lot that will have to be filled in because when the County put
the big dike in they locked him in and he is in a swamp.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
Southold Town Board of Appeals -3-
July 11, 1974
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds
that applicant requests permission to divide property with
insufficient width and area on the north side of Private
Road and the west side of Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck.
The findings of the Board are that applicant is surrounded
by lots that are of the same general size and character,
all of which are improved, and that granting this variance
will not change the character of the area. It is a unique
and unusual circumstance. The Board is in agreement with
the reasoning of the applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not
change the character of the neighborhood, and will observe
the spirit of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie,
it was
RESOLVED, Paul and Jacq~line Kelly, 101 Wallace Street,
Freeport, New York, be GRANTED permission to divide property
with insufficient width and area on the north side of Private
Road and west side of Camp Mineola Road, Mattituck, as applied
for.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No.-1924 , 7:!410 P.M. (E.~D.S.T.)
upon apPli~ation of Gordon Ahlers, P~.E., Manor Lane, Jamesport,
New ¥o~k a/c!B~asby's of Mattituck Manor, Main Road and New
Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, NeW York,i for a variance in
accordance wi.th the Zoning Ordinancei, Article III, Section
100-34 and 100-35 for permission to construct decorative stone
wall (fence) part of which will be over 4 feet in height in
the front yard area. Location of property: Main Road & New
Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, bounded north by New Suffolk Avenue;
east by J. Wickham; south by Peteco Realty; west by Main Road.
Fee paid $15.00.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -4-
July 11, 1974
The Chairman op~ned the hearing by reading the applica-
tion for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits
attesting to its publication in the official newspapers,
and notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by
blueprints which indicate that the proposed stone wall will
extend on two sides of the property. There is a 16.4 foot
opening on Route 25, and the stone wall continues on New
Suffolk Avenue to a line which is behind the building. The
stone wall will have columns which are 8 feet high topped
by decorative lamps.
THE CHAIRMAN: -Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
GORDON AHLERS, P.E.: The lamps will only be at the
entrances.
THE CHAIRMAN: Will this be a rock wall?
MR. AHLERS: It will be fieldstone.
THE CHAIRMAN: Will the columns vary in height?
MR. AHLERS: That's correct. You will notice that when
you come down New Suffolk Avenue the wall drops down to
3 feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: It's 30 feet this way and 30 feet that
way so anybody coming down can not see around the corner.
MR. AHLERS: We will abide by whatever the Board decides.
They are trying to upgrade the property. ~is is part of
upgrading. On New Suffolk Avenue there is an aluminum fence
now that is in disrepair. This will take the place of that
fence and provide a decorative effect. This is generally
along the lines of Huntington Town House.
THE CHAIRMAN: Does Brasby's have more than one location
or is this unique here?
MR. AHLERS: As I understand it, it's Brasby's of
Mattituck. Mattituck Manor was the original name.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -5-
July 11, 1974
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak
for this application?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
MR. ROBERT BERGEN: I don't like the idea of any more
obstruction being there because of traffic. There are trees
and telephone poles and, if you will notice, there is a
little jog to the east and west. Any more obstructions up
there would not help it in the least.
MR. AHLERS: As far as trees and poles are concerned,
my client has no responsibility.
MR. BERGEN: Every pole and every tree is a hazard to
traffic. There have been quite a few minor accidents there.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think the 30 feet on each side of the
entrance should be 3 feet in height. Nothing should be any
higher than 3 feet there.
MR. AHLERS: We will be amenable to whatever the Board
decides.
THE CHAIRMAN: When we made our inspection we were parked
right next to the redwood box with plantings and you could not
see the traffic. I would favor staying with 3 feet for the
30 foot lengths of the stone wall. I thinkkit is a very
hazardous traffic spot.
MR. AHLERS: If that's the Board's decision, we will
abide by it.
THE CHAIRMAN: I don't like the idea of the decorative
lamps extending above 3 feet.
MR. AHLERS: You can take a waterproof fixture and bury
it in the top of the wall and get the same effect.
THE CHAIRMAN: How wide is this going to be?
MR. AHLERS: About three or four feet wide.
THE CHAIRMAN: How would you keep kids from climbing
over it?
Southold Town Board of Appeals -6-
July 11, 1974
MR. AHLERS: There could be a sharp point in the concrete.
THE CHAIRMAN: Do you go along with the 30 feet on each
side, Bob?
MR. ROBERT BERGEN: I don't go along with a fence at all.
If they want to make it attractive looking I believe they
could find some other way rather than putting a fence out
there. It makes me think of a prison or a graveyard.
MR. CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR.: I believe that it would
dress the place up but it would create a hazard.
THE CHAIRMAN: They are permitted a 4 foot fence. Maybe
you would save a lot of money by having a split rail fence.
MR. AHLERS: Split rail fences disintegrate.
THE CHAIRMAN: In your opinion, Bob, there should be no
fence at all.
MR. BERGEN: I believe it would be a hazard to traffic.
Perhaps they can come up with something more attractive than
a fence.
MR. AHLERS: A lot of planting could be done. It's a
question of housekeeping. It might fill up with bottles and
cans.
MR. GRIGONIS: Shm~bs would still be an obstruction to
the view.
MR. BERGEN: Not if you had low shrubs.
MR. AHLERS: One of the advantages with having a fence is
that it never gets any higher and doesn't require maintenance.
Shrubbery looks better but it depends on the maintenance of
the owner for whom I can not speak.
MR. BERGEN: The sidewalk is on Town property.
THE CHAIRMAN: Have you seen any of the planting at Montauki
Manor. It has a sort of Mexican theme. The main clubhouse has
no windows on the ground floor° This is all covered with low
shrubbery. Something like that might be attractive. I am
trying to resolve this in a way that you would not have to come
back here. The consensus of opinion seems to be that it should
be denied because of hazardous traffic.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-7- July 11, 1974
MR. AHLERS: I will come back with two or three different
ideas.
MR. GRIGONIS: I have seen stone posts with heavy chain
in between them.
MR~ AHLERS: I am afraid that children would swing on the
chain.
THE CHAIRMAN: Does anyone else wish to speak for or against
this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to construct decorative stone
wall (fence) part of which will be over 4 feet in height in
the front yard area of property which is located on Main Road
and New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck. The findings of the Board
are that a stone wall would be a hazard to traffic conditions.
Applicant stated that he would work on several different plans
before returning to the Appeals Board.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be
shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of
this property and in the same use district; and the variance
will change the character of the neighborhood, and will not
observe the spirit of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
RESOLWED, Gordon Ahlers, P.E., a/c Brasby's of Mattituck
Manor, Main Road, and New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, New York,
be DENIED permission to construct decorative stone wall (fence)
part of which will be over 4 feet in height, in front yard area
of Main Road and New Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck, as applied for,
without prejudice to future appeals.
Vote of the Board:
Grigonis.
Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1922 - 7:55 P.M. (E.D.S.T.)
upon application of Richard De Maria, 5 Swan Lane, Hauppauge,
New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to
divide lot with insufficient frontage and area. Location of
property: Hiawatha Path, Southold, bounded north by W. Ulhorn;
east by Hiawatha Path; south by C. Boergesson; west by J. Derosa
and Ano. Fee paid $15.00.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- July 11, 1974
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the applica-
tion for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits
attesting to its publication in the official newspapers,
and notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to '
speak for this application?
MR. RICHARD DE MARIA: I am the owner of this property.
THE CHAIRMAN: If this Board did give you a variance to
use these two lots would you be satisfied that there would
be no variance in side lines? You have to have 25 feet in
side yards, 15 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other.
The property is only 100 feet wide. At the time these lots
were purchased that was the requirement. Now the side yard
combination is 35 feet but that's based on 150 foot frontage.
Whoever buys these lots would have to maintain the 10 foot
and 15 foot side yard requirement which was in effect when
you purchased this property. We went over the tax map area
and there is no question that the majority of the lots are
the same size or smaller.
MR. DE MARIA: I bought two parcels.
THE CHAIRMAN: I don't think there is any question but
what, financially, you could get more money for two lots than
for one. Many people are anxious to build but don't want to
buy 40,000 sq. ft. I think you could maintain those side yards.
(Mr. De Mariasshowed his copy of Deed to the Board and
the Chairman read description of the property).
THE CHAIRMAN: There is no survey with the application.
MR. DE MARIA: Would you like to have a copy?
THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, we would like to have it for our records.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone p~esent who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- July 11, 1974
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to divide lot with insufficient
frontage and area on Hiawatha Path, Southold. The findings
of the Board are that applicant is surrounded by lots of a
similar or smaller size which were set off long before the
present Zoning Ordinance went into effect. The Board agrees
with the reasoning o~the applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Grigonls, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED, Richard De Maria, 5 Swan Lane, Haupp~uge, New
York, be GRANTED permission to divide lot with insufficient
frontage and area on property located at Hiawatha Path,
Southold, as applied for, subject to the following condition:
That there shall be no further variance permitted in
side yard, front yard, or rear yard setbacks.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigon~s.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1923 - 8:05 P.M. (E.D.S.T.).
upon application of Elbert E. Austin, a/c William J. Eckartz,
115 Sound Avenue, Peconic, New York, for a variance in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
100-30 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct attached
garage with insufficient side yards. Location of property:
S/S Sound Avenue, Peconic, New York, bounded north by Sound
Avenue, Lot No. 17, Peconic Shores, Peconic, New York. Fee
paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting
to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to
the applicant.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- July 11, 1974
THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch
indicating that the garage would be to the rear of the house
on Sound Avenue, Peconic, and would be 45 feet in length. In
order to do this it would be necessary to reduce the sideyard
on the westerly side of the property. The lot is 50 feet by
150 feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
MR. WILLIAM J. ECKARTZ: I am here to speak for the
application.
THE CHAIRMAN: There doesn't seem to be any other way
to locate the garage on this property.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to construct attached garage
with insufficient sideyards on the south side of Sound Avenue,
Peconic, New York. The findings of the Board are that the
land slopes substantially to the south and if the garage were
located further to the rear the applicant would have difficulty
with high water. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the
applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
-the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, William J. Eckartz, 315 Sound Avenue, Peconic,
New York, be GRANTED permission to construct attached garage
with insufficient sideyards on the south side of Sound Avenue,
Peconic, New York, as applied for.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- July 11, 1974
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1925 - 8:15 P.M. (E.D.S.T.)
upon application of James & Eileen Dugan, 12 Gedney Avenue,
Smithtown, New York ~or a variance in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 and Bulk
Schedule for permission to construct dwelling with in-
sufficient sideyard. Location of property: Osprey Nest
Road & Maple Lane, Lot No. 50, Section II, Cleaves Point
Subdivision, Greenport, New York. Fee paid $'15.00.
The Chairman op~ned the hearing by reading the applica-
tion for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits
attesting to its publication in the official newspapers,
and notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: There is a sketch of the property and
blueprints of the house accompanying the application. This
is a situation where there are two front yards. It's a
corner lot.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
MR. JAMES DUGAN: Mrs. Dugan and I are here to speak
for it. There is a stable and barns on the other side of
Maple Lane.
MRS. DUGAN: We will have a patio at the back and
it would be outside our neighbor's bedroom if the house
faced on Maple Lane.
THE CHAIRMAN: This is a reverse drawing?
MR. DUGAN: Yes.
MR. ROBERT BERCEN: How far back is the house?
MR. DUGAN: 35 feet.
MR. BERGEN: If we gave you 5 feet on the west would you
be willing to set the house back 40 feet or 45 feet?
MR.~DUGAN: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: Your suggestion is that Mr. Dugan place
the house no closer than 10 feet to the westerly side line
and the front yard setback should be 40 feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- July 11, 1974
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to construct dwelling with
insufficient sideyard located at Osprey Nest ROAD AND
aple Lane, Lot No. 50, Section II, Cleaves Point Subdivision,
~reenport, New York. The findings of the Board are that
this is a corner property with two front yards and to
locate the house facing Maple Lane would be a hardship to
the applicant as it would face barns and stables across
Maple Lane, and also heavier through traffic. The Board
agrees with the reasoning of the applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship ~reated is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit of
the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, James & Eileen Dugan, 12~Gsdney Avenue, Smithtown,
New York, be GRANTED permission to construct dwelling with
insufficient sideyard at Osprey Nest Road and Maple Lane, Lot
No. 50, Section II, Cleaves Point Subdivision, Greenport,
New York, as applied for, but subject to the following conditions:
That no portion of the house shall be closer than
.40 feet to Osprey Nest Road.
2. That no portion of the house shall be closer than
10 feet to the westerly side yard.
3. That no portion of the house shall be closer than
30 feet to Maple Lane.
Vo~e of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1927 - 8:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.)
upon application of Nicholas & Patricia Drossos, Main Road,
(Arshamomaque), Greenport, New York for a special exception
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article VI, Section
100-60 C (3) (A) (B) (C) for permission to erect side wall
sign. Location of property: N/W side Main Road (Arshamomaque),
Greenport, bounded east by Long Island Lighting Company;
south by Main Road; west by John Drossos; north by Manor
Grove Corp. Fee paid $15.00.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- July 11, 1974
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting
to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to
the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
MRS. PATRICIA DROSSOS: I am here to speak for the
application.
THE CHAIRMAN: The Ordinance permits one standing sign
12'6" by 6'6", not over 84 sq. ft., and a front wall sign
with certain restrictions. In your case, you have a standing
sign which is within the limits except that you have added
an area sign.
MRS. DROSSOS: That is not working properly.
THE CHAIRMAN: These two items are irrelevant to this
hearing. They were called to my attention by the Building
Inspector. You have another sign on the Main Road?
MRS. DROSSOS: On the North Road. I was in here about
a month ago and paid the bill.
THE CHAIRMAN: The amount that the Building Inspector
says that you owe is $13.44. I think the Board would agree
that you need a sign for the Bar instead of a wall sign on
the front part of the main building. You are permitted to
have one on the front but, if you do, you can't have one
on the side. You have signs in your windows. What we could
do in a situation like this is grant the side wall sign in
lieu of the front wall sign. That will also light the parking
area in the evening.
MRS. DROSSOS: Do I have to take a sign down?
MR. ROBERT BERGEN: You have not got a sign on the front
of the building so we will let you have one on the side.
THE CHAIRMAN: None of this will be permitted unless you
pay the amount outstanding.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- July 11, 1974
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to erect side wall sign on the
northwest side of Main Road (Arshamomaque), Greenport, New
York. The findings of the Board are that the applicant
does not have a front wall sign and a side wall sign is needed
to indicate the entrance to the Bar. The Board agrees with
the reasoning of the applicant.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
and justice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use
districts will not be permanently or substantially injured
and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED, Nicholas & Patricia Drossos, Main Road, Greenport
(Arshamomaque), New York be GRANTED permission to erect side wall
sign in lieu of a front wall sign on the northwest side of Main
Road, (Arshamomaque) Greenport, as applied for, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this sign is subject to all rules and regulations
governing signs in the Town of Southold.
That this permission is subject to applicant paying
whatever charges are unpaid to the Building Department
on this sign and other signs.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1926 - 8:40 P.M. (E.D.S.T.)
upon application of Wickham & Lark a/c Clinton Muttitt,
North Country Road, Westhampton, New York for a variance in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30
& Bulk Schedule and Section 280A Town Law for permission to
divide property and for approval of access with insufficient
frontage and area. Location of property: E/S Grand Avenue ,
Mattituck, bounded north by Rohrbach & Heuser; east by
M. & P. Suter; south by Long Creek; west by Grand Avenue,
Anrig, Hopek, Hanson. Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting
to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to
the applicant.
SouthOld Town Board of Appeals -15- July 11, 1974
THE CHAIRMAN: The appl±cation states that the Planning
Board of the Town of Southold has given tentative approval
of the minor subdivision, subject to the Board of Appeals
approving access to the property and the undersized lot.
The application is accompanied by a survey showing the
division of land.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak fOr this application?
WILLIAM WICKHAM, ESQ.: This right of way was set up
many years ago by the original owner, John Mut~itt, and
named by him. That's the only way we have to get into the
upper piece. Cedar Lane is just about at the bottom of a
hill. If it were extended at all it would be like a pro-
truding lower lip.
THE CHAIRMAN: This is privately owned now by the
applicant?
MR. WICKHAM: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: The entrance to the lower lot is from
Cedar Lane. The right of way tapers from 35 feet at Grand
Avenue to 16 feet.
MR. WICKHAM: Ail the buildings are on one lot.
THE CHAIRMAN: This was owned as one parcel by Muttitt.
It adds up to two or three per cent under three 40,000 sq. ft.
lots.
MR. WICKHAM: We could not devise any other way.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
applicant requests permission to divide property and asks
approval of access on property having insufficient frontage
and area. The findings of the Board are that applicant is
the owner of an irregularly shaped piece of property and
that properties to the north and west of this property are
undersized. The Planning Board of the Town of Southold has
given tentative approval of the minor subdivision subject to
the Board of Appeals approving access to the property and
undersized lot. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the
applicant.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- July 11, 1974
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED, Wickham & Lark a/c Clinton Muttitt, North
Country Road, Westhampton, New York, be GRANTED permission
to divide property and be GRANTED approval of access on
property located on the east side of Grand Avenue, Mattituck,
New York, as applied for, subject to the following condition:
That the Building Inspector shall approve the improvement
of the right of way.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1929 - 8:55 P.M. (E.D.S.T.)
upon application of George F. Schmitt and Wife, 55 Marlborough
Road, West Hempstead, New York for permission to construct
accessory (storage) building in front yard area in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-30 C (2)
and 100-32. Location of property: W/S Truman Path, East
Marion, New York, bounded north by Sullivan & Gorga; east
by Truman's Path; south by E. Foster; west by Marion Lake.
Fee paid $15.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavits attesting
to its publication in the official newspapers, and notice to
the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: The sketch accompanying the application
shows the proposed tool shed will be approximately the same
distance from Truman's Path as Mr. Gorga's tool shed, the
neighbor to the north.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
Southold Town Board of Appeals -17- July 11, 1974
MRS. ELSIE SCHMITT: I have a survey here.
Schmitt showed survey to the Board).
(Mrs.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think it would be agreeable to the
Board if you put your tool shed no closer than 80 feet to
Truman's Path.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds
that applicant requests permission to construct accessory
(storage) building in front yard area. The findings of
the Board are that applicant's home faces the lake and
the rear faces Truman's Path as do the majority of the
homes on the street. The shed will be located back to
back with a neighbor's shed to maintain a uniform appearance.
The Board agrees with the reasoning of the applicant.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
Would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance will not change
the character of the neighborhood, and will observe the spirit
of the Ordinance.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED, George F. Schmitt & Wife, 55 Marlborough Road,
West Hempstead, New York, be GRANTED permission to construct
accessory (storage) building in front yard area of property
located on the west side of Truman's Path, East Marion, New
York, as applied for, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the accessory building shall be located no
closer than 80 feet to Truman's Path.
2. That the accessory building shall be located no
closer than 3 feet to any boundary line.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -18-
July 11, 1974
On motion by Mr. Gillisple, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals dated June 13, 1974, be approved as submitted, subject to
minor correction.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
On m6tion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the next meeting of the Southold Town Board
of Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M. (E.D.S.T.) , August 1,
1974, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen,
Grigonis.
Sign Renewals (29) were reviewed and approved as
submitted.
The following Resolution of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals made on May 23, 1974 on motion by Mr. Gillispie,
seconded by Mr. Bergen, and passed unanimously, was in-
advertently omitted from the minutes of May 23rd:
"RESOLVED that the revised Van Tuyl survey dated
May 9, 1973 showing the division of Lot No. 4 into two
separate parcels, 4A and 4B, and dividing the property
so as to give the garage to the southerly lot, be APPROVED,
in accordance with the Board's decision of May 2, 1974."
Southold Town Board of Appeals -19-
July 11, 1974
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
RESOLVED that the southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:40
P.M. (E.D.S.T.), August 1, 1974, at the Town Office, Main Road,
Southold, as the time and place of hearing upon application of
Richter Home Improvement Co. a/c Diana Tendler, 9th Street,
Greenport, New York, Map No. 986-6, Lot No. 3, for a variance
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section
100-30 C for permission to loCate accessory building in legal
front yard. Location of property: Lot No. 3, Map No. 986-6, end
of 9th Street, Greenport, New York bounded on the north by Pipes
Cove Corp.; east by B. Freeman; south by Peconic Bay (Pipes Cove);
west by J. Caroff.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:55
P.M. ~(E.D.S.T.), August 1, 1974, at the.Town Office, Main'Road,
Southold, as ~the time and place of hearing upon application of
Catherine W. Drake, 424 B Heritage Village, Southbury, Connecticut
for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article
III, Section 100-30 (C) and 100-32 (A) for permission to erect
accessory structure (TV antenna) over 18 feet high. Location
of property: Lot No. 16, Map of Fairway Farms, 3050 Fairway
Drive, Cutchogue, New York.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was
m RESOLVED that the So~thold Town Board of Appeals set 8:10
P.M. (E!~iD.S~T.), August 1, 1974, atlthe Town Office, Main Road,
Southold, as the time and place of hearing upon application of
Alfred J~ Terp a/c Al's Liquors, Griffin Street, Cutchogue.,
New York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article VI, Section 100-60 C (3) (a) for permission
to bring present sign up to the Town Line. Location of
property: N/S Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by
C. Schnedier; east by A. J. Terp; south by Main Road; west by
Griffin Street.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- July 11, 1974
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:25
P.M. (E.D.S.T.), August 1, 1974, at the Town Office, Main Road,
Southold, as the time and place of hearing upon application of
Harvey Bagshaw, Deep Hole Drive, Mattituck, New York, for a
special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article
VII, Section 100-78, Subsection B-4 and Bulk Schedule for permission
to build and operate an automobile body repair shop with reduced
side yard. Location of property: N/S Main Road, Laurel school
district ~11, Mattituck Post Office, bounded on the north by
James O'Connell; east by A. Goodale & Wf; south by Main Road
(Route 25); west by J. O'Connell.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:40
P.M. (E.D.S.T.), August 1, 1974, at the Town Office, Main Road,
Southold, as the time and place of hearing upon application of
MST Construction Corp. a/c W. Barry Everett, 6 Shipman Lane,
Stony Brook, N. Y. for a variance in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article I, Section 100-12 and Article III, Section
100-30 for permission to use lot with adjusted property line.
Location of property: Map of Nassau Point, Lot Nos. 421 and
422, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gillispie, Bergen, Grigonis.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
~P~ED Res eot ull
~/~ 'f~7 -~ ~ p f y submitted, ~
~~ fM~j~or~e McDermott, Secretary
Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman