The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-143.-2-1 SI* te Plans Issued for: Site Plan Review • Proposed Pharmac Date Issued: January 19, 2004 Latest Issue: June 18, 2004 Block 2 , Lots 1 , 25 4 , 27 . 1 , 28 , 29 , 30 o � C E ° E Mattituck, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, NY JUN 2 2004 Southold jowl Planning Board n 1perty Informatio fill No. Drawing Title Latest Issue Owners: Mat < e � Robert Chiapetta Mattituck Bowl Inc. C-1 Legend and General Notes 6/18/04 r (Lot 4) (Lots 2 289 2 s —, C-2 Layout and Materials Plan 6/18/04 a , rr,, :- 126 Brewster Road 126 Brewster Road !�\ . ' Massapequa, l Y 11758 Massapequa, NY 11758 C-3 Grading and Drainage Plan 6/18/04 site/ Water ��r / ty 1 � Mattituck Rtaity Assoc. (Lot 27.1) Northfork Properties Inc., LLC C-4 Utility Plan 6/18/04 � +� h, -�:` Fr �\ 1 (Lot 27.1) ( ) � �J _ . C-5 Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 6/18/04 0�/ � ry aim \""�`k �\ . Lots 1, 30 ' '� srbr'r126 BrewsterRoad 2315 Pine Tree Road C-6 Landscape Plan 6/18/04 °a,. �\ \` Rei /, � ' °� "v� \ \ Massapequa,NY 11758 Cutchogue, NY 11935 C-7 Site Details 1 6/18/04 ��°`\ '::.: Applicant C-8 Site Details 2 6/18/04 Laker Development Group, LLC etarans B. C-9 Existing Conditions Plan 3/18/04 �k District Park 290 Elwood Davis Road, Suite 270 vbn of Souttiol \ "\ ` \ �`•;% Liverpool, NY 13088 Reference Drawings Site Location Map T 0 10M 2000 Feat (518) 306-3747 (P) - (212) 401 -4759 (F) SE-1 Photometric Plan 6/18/04 RI-1 Roadway Improvement Plan & Details 6/18/04 . Utilities Water Natural Gas Suffolk County Water Authority Keyspan Energy 624 Riverhead Road 175 East Old Country :Road 'I FII'ONOLRs1ONEU,POR9UANT TO SOlfrioLO'IOWN COOP.ff1O"NN APPItO{n/.S,3GrOORDti-T. i M THEE MOUMON OF APPROVALIOAI I �,-j„P,�ARE ACCEPT (SEE COMMONS ON oMOLMON) Westhampton Beach, NY 11978 Hicksville, NY 11801 Pr TNANM 1�' �I s Electric Vfii011l?.Ei uR]IiJd iIRH ___—_ ,, r,r Long Island Power Authority TOWN Cl'SOli1TVJL 'P1„iMTI1GCi BO&rr<.D � .GW� a,neruerrelasn�31,615� 333 Earle Ovington Blvd ALITt Rt t?O_:GIJdIl1IU3 TITEE__ An. NO•f➢ :'fl'is approved sits development plan 91011 Ile a;^7ill for Uniondale, NY 11553 a pe:-icl..1 oft.Irce (3+years Dorn ilia date of appxval as per z � d o U p' m .5 It111o11Nlll O p •� O````P'�� fly/ N c v C Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. �-.,, � ,?.�^�� 0 Engineering & Surveying, P.C. 1 ; J��\ e S 301 Nott Street Michael W.J=gltaoa NY Pmfessionol Englneer Schenectady, NY 12305 No.072072 -� I) y I L� _ n p P: 518-370-8602 F: 518-370-8606 I � L.\25085\cod\Id\plarset\25085_LEG.dwg Legend Notes: Adjoining Land Owners Within 500' of Site Exist. Prop. Exist. Prop. General Erosion Control Michael J & Jean E. Vitale Northfork Properties CONCRETE PAVEMENT 1. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY OTHER WORK ON THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE 225 Marlene Lane 126 Brewster Road 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY "DIG-SAFELY NEW YORK" (1-800-962-7962) AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING. AGENCIES AND SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS Mattituck, NY 11952 Massapequa, NY 11758 ---- PROPERTY ONE 0 HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY AND JOB SAFETY. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IN IDENTIFIED IN FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL APPROVAL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT. i^��A RIPRAP ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA STANDARDS AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. Rose Marlekurone Robert A. Calla Engineering & Surveying, P.C. PROJECT OMIT LINE ('-_Lr Y-tr.-11 2 INSPECT AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AND REMOVE SEDIMENT THEREFROM ON A WEEKLY 305 Marlene Lane New Suffolk Ave 0 o CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3.' HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, PARKING SPACES, RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN BASIS AND WITHIN TWELVE HOURS AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND DISPOSE OF SEDIMENTS IN AN Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 Transportation RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY ONE CONFORMANCE WITH THE FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABWTIES ACT AND WITH STALE AND LOCAL LAWS AND UPLAND AREA SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT ENCUMBER OTHER DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND PROTECTED AREAS. Land Development - - - ns it 2Tu To OP OF CURB ELEVATION REGULATIONS EASEMENT REGULATIONS (WHICHEVER ARE MORE STRINGENT). Llsolette U. Unst Robert Chiapett❑ T 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT SEDIMENTATION P.O. Box 1436 126 Brewster Road Environmental Services BUILDING SETBACK ,, ur 1, zs e5 ED BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION 4. AREAS (DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND NOT RESTORED WITH IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (BUILDINGS, PAVEMENTS, SHALL NOT AFFECT REGULATORY PROTECTED AREAS, WHETHER SUCH SEDIMENTATION IS CAUSED BY Mattituck, NY 11952 Massapequa, NY 11758 10100 10+00 BASELINE WALKS, ETC.) SHALL RECEIVE SIX INCHES LOAM AND SEED. WATER, WIND, OR DIRECT DEPOSIT. 301 Nott Street 1, r 13Z75 SPOT ELEVATION 5. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM EARTHWORK OPERATIONS Arnold A & WF Urist Thomas E & Marogret Noone Schenectady,NY 12305 -- - CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT 450 try, 450 rax 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING SUCH THAT EARTH MATERIALS ARE EXPOSED 400 Marlene Lane 6 Forbell Lane 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 nos be M.5 sw TOP & BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION REQUIRED UP TO SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. FOR A MINIMUM OF TIME BEFORE THEY ARE COVERED, SEEDED, OR OTHERWISE STABILIZED TO PREVENT ----- ----- ZONING LINE ! , EROSION. Mattituck, NY 11952 Norwalk, CT 06850 -msµ" Ii BORING LOCATION 6. WORK THE LOCAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL MUNICIPAL STANDARDS. WORK WITHIN STATE --- TOWN UNE RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORMM TO TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS STANDARD 5. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER„ CONTRACTOR Allen E Richards Marie Rambo Owners: Gny 0 TEST PIT LOCATION SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES. SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND CLEAN SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM 22-36 36th Street 225 Sigsbee Road ) ,,,a, Mw 9 Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4 LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE a:J O MONITORING WELL 7,r UPON AWARD OF CONTRACT, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATIONS AND APPLY FOR AND ENTIRE DRAINAGE AND SEWER SYSTEMS. Astoria, NY 11105 Mattituck, NY 11952 Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS, PAY FEES, AND POST BONDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS, WETLAND ONE WITH FLAG IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. DO NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT ROADWAYS. SIDEWALKS, AND FLOODPLAIN �r"E' 12.0 Demolition Richard & WF ZOhra David F. & WE Haas Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) —UD DD— DRAIN AIN FIRE HYDRANTS, WITHOUT APPROPRIATE PERMITS. 23 Wood Avenue P 0 Box 41B Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) - - DRAIN 1. THE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND TO DISPOSE OF EXISTING MANMADE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN THE Albertson, NY 11507 Mattituck, NY 11952 6'RD-+ S. TRAFFIC SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. UNIT OF WORK INCLUDING BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS, SLABS, CURBING, FENCES, UTILITY "! BORDERING LAND SUBJECT TO FLOODING ----U IrL1 - ROOF DRAIN POLES, SIGNS, ETC. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF Town of Southold Jean er Ble l IrL 12"S 9. AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PROPOSED WORK DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED EXISTING UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS, AND UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING 9 Applicant: "Z WETLAND BUFFER ZONE SEWER BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. FOOTPRINT AND TEN FEET BEYOND AND BENEATH PROPOSED EXTERIOR COLUMNS, PER DRAWINGS AND 53095 Main Road 180 Horton Avenue Laker Development Group,LLC �wz NO DISTURB ZONE -r'H'N— —DHW— OVERHEAD WIRE 10, IN THE EVENT THAT SUSPECTED CONTAMINATED SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND OTHER MEDIA ARE ENCOUNTERED DURING SPECIFICATIONS. Southold, NY 11971 Valley Stream, NY 11581 —6"w— —6'W— WATER EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES BASED ON VISUAL, OLFACTORY, OR OTHER EVIDENCE, THE CONTRACTOR 2. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE TERMINATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, IN CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL, Victor & Marian F. Ales Charles A. & Debra Timpone 300'RA 200' RIVERFRONT AREA SHALL STOP WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUSPECT MATERIAL TO AVOID FURTHER SPREADING OF THE MATERIAL, AND STATE, AND INDIVIDUAL UTILITY COMPANIES STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR 329 Forest Road P.O. Box 155 ----4"IT'=--- —4'FP— FIRE PROTECTION SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER IMMEDIATELY SO THAT THE APPROPRIATE TESTING AND SUBSEQUENT ACTION CAN BE TAKEN. SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY SERVICE DISCONNECTS WITH THE UTILITY REPRESENTATIVES. Douglas, NY Laurel, NY 11948 GRAVEL ROAD —2"DW— DOMESTIC WATER 11, CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT DUST, SEDIMENT, AND DEBRIS FROM EXITING THE SITE AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPUCABLE FEDERAL, STATE, Env CLEANUP, REPAIRS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION IF SUCH OCCURS. AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, AND STATUTES. Voleriano & Patrycla Azzara Eileen Flaherty EDGE OF PAVEMENT -- ;v-I— c— GAS 38 Old Mill Road 227 East 66th Street _ Dr_ Rc BITUMINOUS CURB uut— —UGE— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 12. DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION LOADS SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO Existing Conditions Information Merrick, NY 11566 New York, NY 10125 OWNER. CONCRETE CURB -.—T —T TELEPHONE 1. BASE PLAN - THE PROPERTY ONES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND SURVEYS PREPARED BY Diana Nolan Gunther Larry & Catherine M. Lent! 13." CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL ATER RUNOFF DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO OFF SIZE PECONIC SURVEYORS ENTITLED `PLAN OF PROPERTY AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., P.O. Box 654 1435 Park Avenue CCB CAPE COD BERM —rp --- —FA— FIRE ALARM AREAS, AND SHALL BE RESPONSSIBLEIBLE TO REPAIR RESULTING DAMAGES, IF ANY, AT NO COST TO OWNER. NY" DATED MARCH 20, 1996 AND "SURVEY FOR NORTH FORK BOWL, INC, AT MATIITUCK, TOWN OF Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 CG CURB AND GUTTER —CATV— CABLE N SOUTHOLD. SUFFOLK CO., NY DATED DECEMBER 1, 1995. THE TOPOGRAPHY AND EXISTING (PHYSICAL Ecc Layout and Materials FEATURES ARE BASED ON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGEN BRIUSTUN, INC. John C. & Frances Zlambrad John R. Feeney _cc EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB ON MAY 6 AND OCTOBER 8, 2003. - fill ® CATCH BASIN 550 Marlene Lane 495 Sigsbee Road c_ MCC MONOLITHIC CONCRETE CURB 1. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE FACE OF CURB, FACE OF BUILDING, FACE OF WALL, AND CENTER LINE OF PAVEMENT y, TOPOGRAPHY - ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAND 1988 DATUM. Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 Wo � ® DOUBLE CATCH BASIN MARKINGS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Pr PCD PRECAST CONC. CURB GUTTER INLET 2. CURB RADII ARE THREE FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. GEOTECHNICAL DATA INCLUDING TEST PIT AND BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS WERE OBTAINED Timothy J McGowan John H. Stepnoskl SLOPED GRAN. tiCL_ sr.F ®EDGING FROM GOLDER ASSOCIATES, INC. ON DECEMBER 10, 2003. 555 Marlene Lane 21 7th Street vrc vcc '1) • DRAIN MANHOLE 3, CURBING SHALL BE PRECAST CONCRETE CURBING (PCC) WITHIN THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. Mattituck, NY 11952 Jamesport, NY 11947 TYPE � - - PERT. GRAN. T =lU=' ® TRENCH DRAIN OMIT OF CURB Y 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS CONTIGUOUS TO THE BUILDING, INCLUDING Arthur W. & Doris L Aiello Ronald J Mayer E PLUG OR CAP SIDEWALKS, RAMPS, BUILDING ENTRANCES, STAIRWAYS, UTILITY PENETRATIONS, CONCRETE DOOR PADS, COMPACTOR PAD, 11 Fine Tree Road P.O. Box 2029 ----- SAWCUT a°� DO CLEANOUT LOADING DOCKS, BOLLARDS, ETC. Hun'ington, NY 11743 Water MITI, NY 11976 �, Do- ► FLARED ENO SECTION 5. PROPOSED GRANITE BOUNDS AND ANY EXISTING PROPERTY ONE MONUMENTATION DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION BUILDING SHALL BE SET OR RESET BY A PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYOR. Grecory C. Dickerson Herbert A. Gunther I HEADWALL 786 Marlene Lane 805 Donna Drive �EN BUILDING ENTRANCE Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 �D LOADING DOCK J • SEWER MANHOLE Utilities Rose M Carty Arnold A Bocksel BOLLARD ,-CS OS CURB STOP & BOX 1. THE LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND TYPES OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS AN APPROXIMATE REPRESENTATION ONLY. THE Mn0ttl Bo I:, N'1 11952 78 Miller BY d 11773 D �p DUMPSTER PAD a� w� - OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE(S) HAVE NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED THIS INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. O WATER VALVE & BOX . THE UTOUTY INFORMATION SHOWN DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE, SERVICEABILITY, OR OTHER DATA Ronald H Wood Frank Jr. & Nancy Todnck SIGN ssv CONCERNING THE UTILITIES, NOR DOES IT GUARANTEE AGAINST THE POSSIBILITY THAT ADDITIONAL UTILITIES MAY BE y TAPPING SLEEVE, VALVE & BOX PRESENT THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS AND BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE 412 Rte 365 685 Sigsbee Road s DOUBLE SIGN - ,. y1 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND ELEVATIONS OF THE POINTS OF Remser. NY 13438 Mattituck, NY 11952 nu SIAMESE CONNECTION CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES. mu ---�- 'a STEEL GUARDRAIL FIRE HYDRANT 2. WHERE AN EXISTING UTILITY IS FOUND TO CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, OR EXISTING CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM Robert & WF Diesenberg Doreen Sidor req&l °WM WATER METER THOSE 'SHOWN SUCH THAT THE WORK CANNOT BE COMPLETED AS INTENDED, THE LOCATION, ELEVATION, AND SIZE OF 2811 Berth Terrace 730 Sigsbee Road .---- WOOD GUARDRAIL PIV Piv THE UTILITY SHALL BE ACCURATELY DETERMINED WITHOUT DELAY BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND THE INFORMATION Annapols, MD 21401 Mattituck, NY 11952 ai POST INDICATOR VALVE FURNISHED IN WRITING TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE CONFUCT AND CONTRACTOR'S ur1 ® WATER WFll FAILURE TO NOTIFY PRIOR TO PERFORMING ADDITIONAL WORK RELEASES OWNER FROM OBLIGATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL Wood HII Pines Corp. Stanley C, & WE Mlckaliger -- --- -_ - - - - PATH .- PAYMEti WHICH OTHERWISE MAYBE WARRANTED TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT. 412 Rt: 365 P.O Box 993 .(`!'V'V-Tr1 TREE LINE cJ GAS GALE 3. SET CATCH BASIN RIMS, AND INVERTS OF SEWERS, DRAINS, AND DITCHES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ELEVATIONS ON THE Remser, NY 13438 Mattituck, NY 11952 GM GRADING AND UTIUTY PLANS. Nicholls F. Deegan Gary Amick Patricia Heath ---� x- WIRE FENCE o'' GAS METER RIM ELEVATIONS FOR DRAIN AND SEWER MANHOLES, WATER VALVE COVERS, GAS GATES, ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE PULL 855 Marlene Lane P 0 Box 17 FENCE5 SFr •Eux ELECTRIC MANHOLE BOXES, AND MANHOLES, AND OTHER SUCH ITEMS, ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE SET/RESET AS FOLLOWS: Mattibck, NY 11952 Hartsdale, NY 10530 - ---o- STOCKADE FENCE Lei E1.1 • PAVEMENTS, CONCRETE SURFACES, AND ALL SURFACE TYPES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTES - FLUSH Bart)ora Schwarz Jahn P. & WE 4 REVISIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS /18/04 Toner 3 REVISIONS PER NYBaGT COMMENTS 5/18/04 STONE WALL r' ° ELECTRIC METER WFIH FINISH GRADES. 203A 251 wl, N Road Brooklyn, Windsor NY Place acn,ims cw Toxx aP somxow aMUExrs */VOa T RETAINING WALL ¢ # LIGHT POLE • LANDSCAPE, LOAM AND SEED, AND OTHER EARTH SURFACE AREAS - ONE INCH ABOVE SURROUNDING SayMlle, NY 11782 Brooklyn, NY 11242 AREA AND TAPER EARTH TO THE RIM ELEVATION. 1L. REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 ---- STREAM / POND / WATER COURSE (Ui •TMN TELEPHONE MANHOLE Robert & Susan MacLellan Mary Lou Barringer Daae kppvd • -- ---- 4. THE LOCATION, SIZE, DEPTH, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED PRIVATE UTILITY SERVICES SHALL P.O. Box 1119 910 Sigsbee Road DETENTION BASIN (] D TRANSFORMER PAD BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED BY, AND APPROVED BY, THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 pes1gned br DMC or°w„ 5v DMC cbeekea 5r MWJ i +a- iE HAY BALES (GAS, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, FIRE ALARM, ETC.). FINAL DESIGN LOADS AND LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED WITH OWNER -r,- • UTILITY POLE AND ARCHITECT. Edward L & WE Herrmann JCAD ebeexea by DMC aper°.ea by MWJ SILT FENCE Joseph & Constance Moreno �- �- GUY POLE 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FEES FOR POLE P.OP0 Box 1166 990 Sigsbee Road sCOiB None °o9e 1/19/04 RELOCATION AND FOR THE ALTERATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, FIRE ALARM, AND ANY OTHER Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 Pr°1e°t Tai. ----- ---- —4— MINOR CONTOUR 1 GUY WIRE & ANCHOR PRIVATE UTILITIES, WHETHER WORK IS PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR OR BY THE UTILITIES COMPANY. - --20- - —20— MAJOR CONTOUR oiH off HAND HOLE 6. UTILITY PIPE MATERIALS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN: Joseph Miecnikowski Leroy Collins Proposed Retail Developement 1065 Marlene Lane 9395 Main Road Pit P6 (id) 81 PARKING COUNT ° o PULL BOX WATER PIPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CEMENT UNED DUCTILE IRON PIPE Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 CID COMPACT PARKING STALLS Matehllne • SANITARY SEWER PIPES SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SEWER PIPE Dale M. & WE Bergen Keila Farms LLC MATCHUNE P 0 Box 1406 30 Eastgate Drive Mattituekjown of Southold _ on DYL SL DOUBLE YELLOW LINE STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) Mattituck, NY 11952 Huntington, NY 11743 Suffolk Co., New York —L'L STOP LINE 7." SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR FURNISHING AND INSTALLING REQUIRED SITE III IIIIIIII III II ELECTRICAL ITEMS SUCH AS PULL BOXES, CONDUITS, DUCT BANKS, LIGHT POLE BASES, CONCRETE PADS, ETC. AND Anthony 3175 Rte.. Anlongeorgi Junius 48 100 Beekman 12L Street WF Hubbard ieeuea for CROSSWALK SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF AND PROVIDE EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR THESE ITEMS AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL SYSTEM. Mattituck, NY 11952 New York, NY 10159 ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP HANDICAP PARKING 8. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL TRENCHES FOR GAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAS COMPANY'S James J. Kreh Ange & Ano Bourisqu of Site Plan RaV1eW REQUIREMENTS. P.O. Box 125 100 Beekman Street ,4 Ilk VAN-ACCESSIBLE HANDICAP PARKINGClermont, FL 34711 New York, NY 10159 Ar vm 9. .ALL DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURE INTERIOR DIAMETERS (4" MIN.) SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE MANUFACTURER Not Approved for Construction BASED ON THE PIPE CONFIGURATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. Warex Term trios Corp. CPT Red's Marine Soles Dr°wi°y mi° 1 South Water Street 605 Bayshore Road Newburgh, NY 12550 Greenport, NY 11944 Abbreviations Legend and Alan A. Cardinale Eidal Corp P.O. Box 77 P.O. Box 1404 General Notes General U Mattituck, NY 11952 Mattituck, NY 11952 ABAN ABANDON ELEV ELEVATION NIC NOT IN CONTRACT CB CATCH BASIN PVC POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE Roy C. & Robert Schoen hoar Antonia Burriesci ACR ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP EXIST EXISTING NTS NOT TO SCALE CO CLEANOUT RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE 330 Eastwood Drive 8 Pineview Lane AN ADJUST FDN FOUNDATION PERF PERFORATED DCB DOUBLE CATCH BASIN R= RIM ELEVATION Cutchogue, NY 11935 Hampton Bays, NY 11945 APPROX APPROXIMATE FE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION PROP PROPOSED DW DRYWELL SMH SEWER MANHOLE Jody Pumillo Walter B. & Ruth H. Koch `,`4pA OF N 44j xb� Drawing Number BIT BITUMINOUS GRAN GRANITE RET RETAIN COND CONDUIT TSV TAPPING SLEEVE, VALVE AND BOX Pat Lane P.O. Box 225 ,�P<tf�i' Mattituck, NY 11952 Laurel, NY 11948 BS BOTTOM OF SLOPE GID GRADE TO DRAIN R&D REMOVE AND DISPOSE DI DUCTILE IRON PIPE UP UTIUTY POLE ? y; QF'\" ✓G-'•�' ,- �-y_ 1 5 # o Imo' BWIL BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE LA LANDSCAPE AREA R&R REMOVE AND RESET HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYYLENE PIPE Rob Roy Realty - i /`/' P 0 Box 124 39 ` yr COMIC CONCRETE LOD LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE SWEL SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE HYD HYDRANT Mattituck, NY 11952 ` O DYCL DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE MAX MAXIMUM SWILL SOLID WHITE LANE LINE INV INVERT ELEVATION Shee1 °1 NOTE. .�.,Nql _ �` 2 ]0 TYP TYPICAL PROPERTY OWNERS LIST PROVIDED BY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Michael W.77TH EL ELEVATION MIN MINIMUM ON JANUARY 5, 2004. ghans Project Number N.Y. Professlonol Engineer 25085 No.072072 \...\25085\cad\Id\planset\25085_LEG.dl \25085\c.d\Id\plONset\25OB5-PLOT ALT dwy d \E`J,1JW �i��/ / � �1 �lJ CURB RAMP (TYPE A� ot•wo _p`, "i !� /, i /� ' WITH 4' L DINCG %- Engineering & Surveying, P.C. r / t � E/MOE E�RRAlt Transportation on AS RED/ Land Development �r = y p,I Environmental Services TAFFY �% �- -�� o�:r JIJNCIIObI ghF / i i%��=i/ - �+ \ (��. J L% ! / / 301 Nott Street jugr I SEE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Box ❑ 'i �� -� '" �n-`�j, 1� / // _ '" / % - ND DETAILS IT OF WORK 518 a FAX 518°/� E SAA-1b % /r� �r �' q, PLAN FOR LIMIT Schenectady,NY 12305 // !1 \C �1 t�A RbADWAY IMPROVE EN /\ P Owners:N FOR LIMIT OF WO K 5j � � t !_ '/',aR! - AND DETAILS Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) Northfork Bowl Inc. V / SEE DUNN ENGINEERIN v � � _ `I \ I I I Mattituck Realty OOts2,28, 29) oEw / P4AN5 FOR CURB RAM z �i!� �" 4C ,/moi " x \ u ryAssociates (Lot27.1) GU\l r, 4" OPENINGII -CURB NorthforkPro Properties (Lots R PLACEMENT AND i �' / N" TO ALLOW D- IfGE - 1o'-a" P (L ) C OSSWALK ��/ , �JI- ErEf } o=b"x12'-o" � PROVIDE sTL. RECEIVER Ct1A j At/ j R ALIGNMENT GONC. APRON to'-o^ SLEEVE SET IN GONG. AT Applicant: / �L,,, _,/ 'i'"b' �'j: ��o� C- v \ Yq/ • CLEAR GATE , cti F ��C l OPENINCANE BOLT 6-1v Laker Development Group, LLC t�� EtPLvC[ y 2" 0 D. GALV. PIPE GATE a p S l 0 B D `_TION <�/ D N7L 1 ,' 1 ( -; � > �� ` �G 'b / W/ WELDED FRAME .S1gII SU111171slFy - S eci cation / �p T��°TOfN p I MONUMENT SIGN 'o :... _ �>.=r�% < / - _ _. 4 I 4" (SEE DETAIL) / i ' / ' /� \ \ M.U.T.C.D. P $ Desc. SOUT LD 0.001 AC) J E RASS • , / 1 '` `'� �// / i % ' -� ACR Number Width Height ') "�� ., /� i ,�� / ./, �t'__ , .' _ - 3" O.D d GALV. /- \ H/r, /�O `i� "' -- - / /- _ - -'---. L7�—f �uF _ TYP „M„ 5'-1a^ ( ) R1-1 30" 30" Nr � ...> /..CC / /" - I I GATE POSTS jo - E1P _ - air cove. Gr4AvEL - -- - -- -- -- r CR- YPF "B'" �o PA :I; F_Iv oACrI11=PlT Ib: �� -_ SjOF 0 �,i ii�rLS n' \ rl, . 19 0 - (. - _ I 6.. THICK SEALED - /" r SSE CU B , "EA GONG. PAD - SEE CC -0' O /oR VGC � PS' FOR ALL CR'S) 9 0" WEC PUDNA' _ CC �p ^ 13'-4" DWGS. FOR GRADE ELEVATIONS R3-1 24' 42" z� 'C Jc B`- ` R� ( YPE 3A) UI of P vEMEN 2" o D (16 GA.) 7, L19-A I n S �. ��i — -_ TRUCKS TFAF Uf ° o'_ r '/� - -- — — — -- — — — - -- I 6'-2" 3 -1 1/2" LINE POSTS �� BJX �00 �� N�U E}� 7 FDUPID_ r U I - I' ACR TYPE .'H.. l F F D DP dERI1FAD I� `Jy,,_ - - SEE ROAD ROVE EN GA<, a FOR Pr,! a �, - O O R7-8 R7-8 �� Es OUlj� PLAN FOR LI I WO£ K I MGTEP, r1I o a . 9.0' 9.0' (TYP.) (\TYP.) R y I I I I -3 R3-2 24" 42" AND DETAILS TY�. r • CROSSNJ� � Tro �75 � - Q YP „M,. R1 1 � I i -�, _ o in R3�1 6" 6" BOLLARD (TYP.) 6'-0" TRUCKS z A 5 "� E - R7-8 } I 1. q : U G'WATER I r'il 0 I METEr� �� R/ 8A -� � r_ E2CI, TIRr Q W OD " � , R4-7 24• 30" n- LAN ERS �LD�N17 Tb { TETocb.A E / BE DEMOLI$� ED- { 1YashEnclosurePlan - RESERVEN ISTI G 15.0 e 24.8r� �'' c ' - ',r q F / -� MENT ALCFESS a-- N - I 3/00 N.T.S. PARKING E= 9 j f/ UILDI G 0 -�( t , DWGS. 4 u/E, I` r R7-8 r i6" DE OL SHED ro ' ? ARQhf ) E-XN�TINGWV99D -- �AI�E. L NOTES: c A / ftA)hlTE_R'ArCP SETBACK (100 FEET) 1 . - �, C z o / BE DEMOLISHED ACR 7,- 1 Z 13 12.Tt 5 3.0 �] ) THE PROPERTY L@ES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND �- o �, } J I j = o T O 1 SURVEYS PREPARED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS ENTITLED "PLAN OF k - - _ .—I R7-8A 12" 6" ACCESSIBLE _ �; * , g PROPERTY AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" tUP i L• T( pj' cOP.IC. i} 13 , p°'° DATED MAR. 20, 1996 AND '"SURVEY FOR NORTH FORK BOWL, INC. - CON'CRE �LATFORM AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" DATED DEC. VAC v A NDRAIL �1 1, 1995. C' ' ' ' ' 6 CVS COMMENTS 6/2/05 z D ` 1 sAC I 2) THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AN ] 3/11/05 - �_ L ( / �� L _-- f STATE ANO TONNSHIP COMMENTS Co ' ' " ., `� ��_ �OSED VS -I �� + `'I rri �_ .' ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, a/s/o4 rrt r U �I fT 6 TOWNSHIP COMMENTS v T 1 _/1� �E INC. ON MAY 6 AND OCT. 8, 2003. rn - it IL) - ` � BUILD II�_G D 7.0 t ��- n. 8 TOWNSHIP COMMENTS 7/15/04 n -T c = -o / a 3) THE SITE IS SHOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 ON THE 4 REVISIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ASSESSORS MAP: DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 143, -� - .� IE...��T./�°.. Gn �� '`� r� �� - - Y I� f 3 5/18/04 r- 'd - f 111 �� V� l BLOCK L RENSIONS PER NYSOOT COMMENTS _ / m R 0 ATE AFFIC _, - PAINTED '2 PENACNSPFATOYM01'SONHOIDGpI'"'I 4/1/aa I - �N A� UIRED 4) THE TOTAL AREA OF LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 IS 77,801 1 ) / _1 - � Q PAVEMENT �I REASONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 V �LLE(8A L14 n S.F. (1.7861 ACRES) No Radefon Date ppvd 1\R- (TYP.) Y M 5) THE SITE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 5 LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN ZONE X (AREA Des19 by DMC Drawn by DMC checked by MWJ " ado I `D DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN) AS SHOWN ON CAD checked by Approved by I Ci C' THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY, DMC MWJ R1-1 _ - ° scale 1„"0, Date t/19/04 R3-2 rr i' COMMUNITY NUMBER 360813 PANEL 0481 SUFFIX G, MAP NUMBER R I T TRASH ENCLOSURE Project Title o ACR TYPE "'B' I �- - 3610300481 G, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4, 1998, 24.0' 1r. . . � (SEE DETAIL) ? m o 7A N F ( `l i 6) ALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TRUNCATED Proposed Retail Developement _ r HL l -- o EHOPpSED VERTICAL _ ! RELO TE UTILITY POLE � T --- -- ---- _ o -- DOMES (SEE DETAILS) ACR _ MP CTQ� MODEL -� cc ryo Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 TYPE ACR T �E "B ' / � ' _l_4280� ON �COMPACTOR ROVIDE FEN S R' _ / (TYP.) ( ) ,3.afi- X0.5' N coMPACTo u,L*AIL ZONING TABLE P;BOLLARDPAD SEE DETAILS 1�3 III Mattituck,Town of Southold FITs' N' ;N A OUND PERIM EI F ZONE: B, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 Suffolk Co., New York �FF,F=._'" �N�FE-2_ -, ° L+ o SAWC z leeoedrar 12.0'1 "12.0° (TYP. PROPOSED USE: RETAIL - � � ✓Lt �1 ' Lq •. • REQUIRED PROVIDED Site Plan Review MIN. LOT SIZE 30,000 S.F. 77 801± S.F. FRONT SETBACK o f l _ Ili :'-� �l ° � � •- ” o'•) P - - -- - - _ -.1 - -- _7 R3-1 } PYC r N.Y. S.R. 25 100.0' 75.6'* Not Approved for Construction 5.0 3.0' I M" SIGSBEE ROAD 100.0' 98.1'* Title e } LOW MARLENE LANE 100 0' 88.8,* E '" rCr BVCR -O ( ( �- .1-y -tw 7_' " ^r, ® O:C. REAR SETBACK 35' 33.5' Layout and TYPE �- - I� y,= , '� ') _I.�'-�, ,3 �„ ESP MIN. LOT WIDTH 150' 285'± 2 O 1 f ' ., .�, r, y� DIN\G),DO K �,.N - •� - - __ _ v / MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 2 STORIES-35" 1 STORY-26 ' `T,0 STORY-26- L F2AHJAG�- v.E , � - h. MAX. LOT COVERAGE 0.3 0.19± Materials Plan AN - 6 200$ << � � " _ _�� 4 A , _ _ MAX. BLDG. WIDTHS 60' 100'1 aL)�C. _ M T, '�._-f� h 9 21 0,50, W^ EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FEATURE 11nieTT < ' S T.11 a[E � )0 � � W,r FBI — I {I 'O PARKING TABLE_ Ae— �' '"T,, YDrowing NumberJ 54 -\ 6 FT STOCKADE _1 ZONE: B, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 �� tV VM MATCH EXISTING - FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT �' I I PROPOSED USE: RETAIL _ lr /'/� rr1 rn \ V 2 �I o 1 m -° REQUIRED PROVIDED o �I RETAIL ® 1 SPACE 200 S.F. 1 75 1 85 r'A�� sheat of HANDICAPPED 5% TOTAL 4 1 4 2 10 6' J r<T o \ - _ 20 0 20 40 Michael W.7unghans Project Number p �z I N.Y Professianm Eaglaeer 25085 SCALE IN FEET No.072072 \...\25085\cad\ld\planseA25085_PLOT TRUC/KAWR 0 07,'et L\25085\cad\Id\pI onset\25085_PLOT.dwg Vera stab - i Engineering & P.C. 7w I ; 1-7 / 5'(RD) �+ � � 3 �4. = � 1 =7 7 2- (TI?) r / / � � / 7 i � lV S g Surveying,ying, 17.25�(12ipUT) / �- / - " Transportation - - - _ - v I2aT %(1 %0 T)/' j '� v = Land Development i` -� r - ;% ): ti- ; J- �- _7 I r �� 0 / (�O,fi)�� - qqq Environmental Services �� gad., TC 21.4 'P ' hAFI �� ' ,i ��ii DMH -20 + f r/� ` 301 Nott StreetBC e22 � r20.0 Schenectady,NY Y 12305 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606, �'1� ,OUJ) 20.0 8.0 (BOT)-,- - �), i Owners: Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) w 22.6 = t ; I - Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) 1 MACH EXISTMattituck Realty Associates ot27.1= . "°� ( = B.0 (BOT) N� . �''i - Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) i - ----- , %' P EE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT LpkercDevelopment Group,LLC -SEE ROADWA� IMPROVEMENT -� / i '� - \ ' PLAN FOR LMT OF WORK-- �' fA i � �`� ��' '; LAN FOR LI IT OF WORK - ND DE AIL - AND DETAILS ,�50t ) - A '20 4I +Y 1� BC 25.3 ? 3' za _7,j7,`- �� , R= ARDS i" 5 I ' c �� \ � ��i F� 2 �h �, -22.4 .7 C - - , 5� T 25 a � II _� � _ .. _ - - p ` J - - z c f3 25 - _ , 25.7 I � 25.5 _ 7 I = 17.0 P j,z gu1 J I = 0 TC 12 DI 7.01 I T) ) (BPQ 25 $ .0 T IFAI �I11 .. BC.-25.4 - (LYP-)- t+ 6" D.1. DMl' -'3D t I �17�1 a a C46 2 0- TC 25.4 TC 24. BC 7211 2. � ��Er 5 - r BC 24.9 85 (12 ) - RbGE / 25.1 BC 5 ��' (112' o T) tis. s- I = .0 " (�c -- - d. . -�� TC 25 4,,,, TC 24.5 22. I 25. &24.9 BC 24.0 u - - -[? 2s; ATERI '_ .d_ - �I� 25.2 254 _�� 54q TC _ �� LFL %., .5u BC ' 4.1 BC 2 . 1 - DMH-1E I = ' FEE= ?5J 4 ) 21.5 ' � 1��E X25 43 24:7 TC 24.2 V I = 14.8 (12" IN) _ RIDGE LINE ( ) DMI -13C ��. I = 7.0 BOT C 23.7 7 T^E DMH-1D �- �, �.� 1 � � (12" IN) 25�4 _ ✓ L s,u TOcr, ; C 25.4 a (BOT) I 1=�4.8 12"" IN) -- - - I v ENS fa ° BC 23.9 - =o - p 4 I = 7.0 BOT) - I „ , , pMA�I �� 'J � s DMH-1C �- �� ,� -I - �r 11"7 w+.aa a PROpOSE� �_ +�VS 20.9 7 � II PI ] i - + \ /- ; REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS I = 15.0 (12" IN) »_ -I. BUILDING ARE + dS. f1��0�1 i I = 15.0 (12 OUT) p 14 *� � n 1 r REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 I = 7.0 (BOT) d �� _ P �Ft 1°'IT 23 `\1 _ z 4/1/04 !�m R,,sms Pm roan w soumwn cauumrs v 2 I i e No. REMSIONS PERCVS sVS COMMENTS /D[04 e DMH-1B �7 Tr7 ;:, � � ; ,pvd Oeel 20.8 - TC 22.9 DMC DMC MWJ _ V ` ;° �"� �1. ' r 21' r� 4'k� 9ned hY Drawn by aneaked by I = 15.0 (12" IN) -QC 22. cecketl by Approved b �� ,I � DMC y MwJ CAD h r; " 21.2 -72 AJ-_ .__ EE RO DWA IMPROVEMENT °" 1"=20' Date 1/19/04 I = 15.0 (12" OUT) TC 21.9 (n P ) �� I = 7.0 (BOT) ' �� ga BC 21 4 21 21.1 l NDN D FOR RILSI IT OF WORK Pmraat Tne 20 7t, Proposed Retail Development DMH-1A - . , Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 20.15 I �l � _ ID-4 `j ' �'! I - 15.15 12 N I,I � ( _ - =17 F=VARI Q l m Z I - 15.15 12"' OUT I, _ - / +� 21.6' Im j = 18.OQ (0 T) Mattituck,Town of Southold I = 15.15 12' OUT 21.6 ' �o�'° =" Suffolk Co. New York M 21.6 _ Ieaaed ler I = 7.0 BOT MH- 1 ) BC, 21.5 25:5. `TC 21. 21.5 - 6" D.I. 4 FF i ENFEE 'r' .5 �w K" BC 21.4 _6- D. 0.4 �I SD-1 R=VARIES + TC 20.3 ° 19 ° 5.45 22,15 Esq = 16.8 1 RD) Site Plan Review 9.1 � '�_�IV(' R = 16.8 (T d'' 4 2Q 0 !�R(�20 BG 1 8 - TC 21.9 �,�., I = 15.9 (OUT) o AU 20.1 = 16.8- 12�' OUT 7 - f + BC� ,15';,J BC 1 .5 7 BC 21.4 ( Not Approved for Construction ❑) 1, 9 PR-PO D "'�d 21 TC 22. = 8.0 (BQT) Drawing L11e DW-1 x' ,... s �o.o - 19.35 � la �� I 1 , �.v � ;; I � MH- � / 1 i G - -- - k:' 2 I = 15.35 (RD) � Grading and I = 15.35 (TD) � �,� " �-" x �� =�� T, _,� yl �� 9' - 16.7 (1z'" IN) Drainage Plan I = 15.35 (12"' OUT j � ( w. -ice y ri v �� 5, = 16.7 �I (12I' OUT) I = 7.0 (BOT) �Y%,= : ir�. �"� ,fir r , .,_ V � � 2, 19 _7 ' = 8.0 (BQT) ROADWA I P OVEM T - -� - ---^i� Nti "�7 18' - ')MH- SEE , _� '- - - [ 9 ---F /� DW-4A DMH-4C PLAN FOR LI IT 0 WOR '+'I+; -J ` . ----- N 0.7 Drawing Npmber M, _ R=21.35 . ' 20.4 AND DETAILS I I �A , .J >< i�, --- 717 r I -'��)- - / 4 ��o�eF-N T` I = 1,2:0 BOT I = 16.4 12- IN = 16.5, �I (12' IN) - o� (E 0W��ep�., (BOT) I = 8.0 (BOT) . = 16,5 (12 oUT) - Kp 8;D (80T) 20 0 20 40 _ xt _ 3 4 &_°+ib / SCALE IN FEET '�� ' ,�' Q. Sneer ar 3 10 xj Michael ' 7unglisos Pra7ean Nambar -E '\ N.Y. Protaealaaal Engineer 25085 l Na.072072 \...\25085\ead\ld\plmset\25085_PLOT.dwg C\25085\cad\Id\pI Oeset\25085-P LOT.d,og Nit ti d �w Engineering & Surveying, P.C. e °w - / / Transportation -I 17.25 (TD) 7 7/ I = 17.25 12� Oi ,J -p, Land Development 12 00 1 - - ; „_ ..�� Environmental Services ,,E�1 , v 1 'Tr (�D�) ., u- 301 Nott Street r:Ahl 11 - �� - ,�Ir � - - DMH -3B ."i' �� „e ' `�� - - - - "- _ �0�' �� 518370Schenec8602 NY 5018370 8 606 - ,I , e,,. 'P- t ..�, 1 , I - „UfIl11�FI _ _ - 22 0 so1 I; - _ 1- �� -� p I 7 'b 1 r �, Owners: �IaVI "NvkJ� � ) ,0\11\\1(12 " OUT) i r �\ t ] �� - r °' 1 Robert Chiapetta(Lot 4) 3A�" �E 8 0 ' (NOT _ - i - i I Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) _ Associates of 27.1 i - - Iviattituck Realty Associ (I ) Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) - 22.6 \ Q . A7 r ,DCVI E z kr$: 12 IN 6 BOT) Applicant: Laker Development Group,LLC 4 a u SD 3 n R= IARIES �� J - I,�k ' / �.) n 7. I = 7.6 (OU ) - _ DMr-3C2.5 I ca 111 _ r v,c I 7.0 (1 ' o' T) 12" D.I. _ - sl I = P-0 (BT) - - - _- y I" IRA IIu -- - - - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - IYP. l_ - °�r- DM -3D �� SEE NOTE 2 Bpr -- -- ----- 1 c 6" D.I. , 22. ° cn _ I T-= 6.85 (12"" ) ` METER SEPTIC A I = 6.85 (112" 0 T) - ?, A 3'X3' PULL FINISH GRADE R=_ L';.0 1 = .0 ( OT) . 'a. (v} BOX EXIS ING GA MA N -� W 11,F? �C E� `� .,r ((FIN L ROU ING 20" A. T �) DETERMINED BY AS MnER � �._ -- ° ��;' � - UG TELE c- a _F1 11 I 2 G /'T 1 ONt QCT T EX I TING DMH-1E i" GAS METER R _�.4.� hc D INLET 21.5 EN " (SEE ARCH. DWGS.) �TILI , POLI --- - -- TII I = 14.8 (12" IN) :LPTI : I� 'i; DM � E a I = 7.0 (BUT) P Z Jy a 3 b ay IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS I r ILL EXISTING GREASE TRAP, ) \*` solL ® ® ® solL SEPTIC TANK, AND LEACHING T �12" IN DMH-1 D I 1 - (BOT) EFFECTIVE 21.4 L - -- EN OOLS WITH SAND IN ACCQRPAKE-) y ea -_ . ITH LOCAL AND STATE R�Q?S ,y I - SEE TAELE I = 14.8 (12'" IN) �' z '�" u) / ••4 n 4. I = 7.0 (BOT) 7rL- y cc a 10' 3 DMH-1C " w, PROPOSED CVS PROPOSED PIS PQS DI MIN 4 REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 - I'll � I d° 11 `L � I N Py,�Q1E C /t �I 3 REMSIONS PER NYSODT COMMENTS 5/15/04 20.9 a SEPTIC TANK h I - 15.0 (12" IN) -' BUILDING AREA �(TYP.)' R ��, I = 15.0 (12" OUT -` p 14,467 ±SF. _6" PVC Rol M 22.7 �� T8 P 2 "Emems 9 .om saumaw cauux 3/1600a I = 7.0 (BOT) 2 I:I SMH _ CLEAN'LL MATERIAL AND TO BE GRAVEL REMSIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/15/04 No Remsi"n Dole Appvd i' �R=22.6 ` �' Dee�gned ev DMC Drown dv DMC en"ek"a nv MWJ DMH-1B � CAD checked by DMC Approved by MWJ i - r O II 2 FT. MIN. ABOVE 20.8 ay r- I • LPMH 1 LPMH 3 IIS- GROUNDWATER sesle 1"=20' Dale 1/19/04 e I R=22.3 I Project Title I = 15.0 (12"` IN) N� _1Z�, J R=22.5 LPMH 2 I = 15.0 (12" our) (TYP.) R=22.2 Leaching Pool, Drywell, & Drain Manhole Detail 1yo3Proposed Retail Developement I = 7.0 (BOT) ( tea) • -- - O I N.T.S. Source: VHB LD Block 2 Lots 1 2 4 27.1 28-30 DMH-1A _ _ 6" FIRE CONNECTION , = FOISTING WATER MAIN D-4� 20.15 1 SIAMESNNECT TO E CONNECTION NOTES: MattituckjownofSouthold I = 15.15 (12" IN) DOMESTIC WATER PER ^ 11 DUCTILE IRON =18RI0 S A 110' 4.5' MIN. BELOW GRADE (pYT) 1. DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER IS BETWEEN 19 AND 22 FEET SuffolkCo., New York I = 15.15 (12" OUT a BELOW GROUND SURFACE ACROSS THE SITE ACCORDING TO THE --d far CONNECTION I = 15.15 (12" OUT MH- GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT PREPARED BY GOLDER I = 7.0 (BOT) ryr, w 6" D.I. 0 4 ASSOCIATES INC. DATED DECEMBER 8, 2003. _ 6" D.I. i' =" EN' Site Plan Review = 16.8 (R ) 2. FOR DRYWELL COVERS USE CAMPBELL FOUNDRY 2250 OR R=VASD- = 16.8 T APPROVED EQUAL. FOR SEPTIC TANK, LEACHING POOL, AND Not Approved for Construction R=VARIES %'\ _I .. �-}� = 16.8- (12' OUT DRAIN MANHOLE COVERS USE NEENAH FOUNDRY 1707 OR Dr"wing TlnTlep I = 15.9 (OUT) _ " I •T, ' ,r-1 ,. = 8.0 (BOT) APPROVED EQUAL. o C7 l _' PRO.POM �> DW-1 3. SEE SHEET SE-1 FOR LIGHT FIXTURE DESIGNATION. n DR, MH- 19.35 ``1( 7 ,r \ 0.3 Utility Plan in I = 15.35 (RD) Fri V' ��, � P-��1 � = 16.7 (1 IN) 1 = 15 (TD) rl rt �, 1 �� - - ��'� �" 1,1, 1 b r - 16.7 (12 OUT) I = 15.35 (12" oUT - i \,� L -„f Y - _ (BOT) 1 _U _ J - 1 = 8.0 BIT I = 7.0 (BOT) °.4 A �' �� l� \ � Dmwln Number u _�_ - '( }�, ,� DW-4A DMH-4C MH- r ,.• tEOFroe"''., �. R=21.35 ( ) 20.4 ( 0.7 . �P ._.......w ' ,: W ; 1 = 16.5 1 " IN 9.'p0\ VGy. o /� I = 12.0 BOT I = 16.4 12'" IN ( ) =* s ' I = 8.0 (BOT) = 16.5 (12 OUT) CST = 8.0 (B T) '\ 20 0 20 40 %, SS;�y20 2.'�\,��d•• sn"et4 "r 10 '., )Ali t SCALE IN FEET h L . o�° ? rJ-n II \, Michael W.duagLans 25085Npmner N Y Pmfesslsnol En EXISTING WATER MAIN I I No.072072 G \...\25085\cad\1d\plaraet\25085_PLOT.dwg I L.\25085\cad\Id\p1Onset\25DB5_PLOT dwg 'r (] TAI I(.- r Engineering & Surveying, P.C. 1 T Transportation Land Development Environmental Services IRAFFlr 301 Nott Street UNClinpl l^^- ! ry LJ i r D ,q p IJ i \ Schenectady,NY 12305 BOX LI �� --� - '� /�"�- tiW� �' 1 %A�� • 1 � , / - r .�� 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 - ) t - ✓= c Owners: DRIP LINE' Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) /.-� NorthforkB1w Bowl v _ Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) i' �� TREE TRUNK Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) I - � ` Et ' � � I � f LIMIT OF \, r Applicant: � � '� DISTUR$ANCE a -I ', Laker Development Group,LLC :� w SILT FE NC V 1v Plan I \ 2 07 ' ul 24 .� I POS .( ORANGE PLASTIC r FENCE (TYP.) 21 22,ri SILT ENC ,� - tJ s _ - - IMT ' , TFAF )UI c — bh _ - __ 22 F'I - a DIS UR . ICE Ay I� 70.0 - — -r` — — TREE FENCE R©TRETION i •.1 GAS II\ METER I / - -- -_ '� �� \• n I I \ I 1$leVetion (3) EQUALLY SPACED TIES (TYP.) Notes: i •v ` ytil "� - _D-- '- ^/ vvv 1. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN n " I _ ' EN II Tree Protection Fence 6/03 U I A y1w ¢I �., N.T.S. Source: VHB I / 2 - 51 _ 1 G `� REV LD 610 4 T I I I �1 I I FYI I _ - I I ___ s ., . 2G - - --- v= EN I Stabilised Construction Entrance Details 3- , t, _ Ae' nxn j ( IN v eA� PROPOSED CVS % zi" �;(T I� � � I,'I ��rONe P.wAn =�E aT On jl PROTECTION _.1 BUILDING AREA 6 r � -{ �� -- Un J'��t 4 REMSIONs PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 S I \ �P' !� �'(!] B M n \ f1LreR cLorl."—� PROFILE OFILE nouNTAeL[ eewl REMSIONs PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 14,467 ±SF. N �I T _ pPT]GNaL I ,, • 7 r �� p� ubsne. ROeSons RIC TOWN rc mumom coWuexTs 4/7/04 <3fi 2,z�.' py n.• I�'• L 1 wl 1� 1-, .RounP l'lf/ i' ' eA ° �' • �l 1 p, CTi Nn Revslon Dote gPPvd y�"e[$'�.dy se' nxn 1 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18le �� . _ ® �- _ Designed by DMC Drown by DMC cnonked by MWJ ( � — .� - • i - CAD checked b A i - N\ 1' % Y PProved by ® _ CONSTRUCTION "EXIT I " " ` DMC MWJ • Nry.` =U ,r L__— n n: nxn. r,vcncn. stele prate 1/19/04 27 ® -- ' I r Pmfect TIM. titi j —T Proposed Retail Development ® � �+ I , PLAN VIEW �° I q �I i I Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 �I; CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS Mattituck,Town of Southold 1 STONE SIZE - USE 2 ,TGNF, uR RECLAIMED pa RECICLEO O3NCRETE Suffolk Co., New York I / jy,. . ! 2 i �' EQUIVALENT L Issued for n _ i Z I 2 LENGTH - NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET ( EXCEPT ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE EN" LOT YHERC A 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH WOULD APPLY \ •I 11 /� :�— )� ® 9 yn 1• • L.0 3. THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN 1 6 I INCHES Site Plan Review 7"'� 1 WIDTH - TWELVE 112 ) MINIMUM BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH \v [ A _II A �-}� _ ,I. 79 AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS TWENTY-FOUR ( 211 FOOT IF SINGLE ENTRACE T_ SITE. 1 .II* r l ` I- L ®y 4I Not Approved for Construction rl ❑ \ \-�` \ I ^I!JG 21 ( ® ® I ;' II 5 PLACINGFILTER C OFT STONEILL .it PI ,CED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO pmwln9 Tlila WATER FLOWING GR DIVERTED TOWARD SURFe CE ;IaTER - ALL SUR FACE '> i \. I\ 'I /�' NI!•\ \C , r r'_ X11 - - ® \ i III CONS'PING ON ENTRANCES SNeLL BE PIPED ACROSS THF ENTRANCE. SOIL Erosion and r I -/-�h I /V ___�'."(��1 LO I '� IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL. q MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5 1 SLOPES If' WILL BE PERMITTED, i n ] MAINTENANCE - THE ENT igNCE SHALL BE nAINiA:NED If, c CONO".TIO'. Sediment Control Plan _ { C1 �' _ (' / yam- `✓�. - - WHICH WILL PREYENi TRe CK I'IG DR 'LOWING 3F SECIIMCNT ONTO PUOLIC .. 'DROPPED WASH Ec DR TRec=Eo - - I RIGHTS-DF-WAY. ALL 9FOIMENT PPII1_Eo. OR .eT�1� IBS[, ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS DF WAY MUeT BE REMONEO IMMEDIATELY . 9 kll _ �� O WHEN ➢ASKING I9 REOJIREO SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABIZZED (• A il} \ / _1 , T _/ ~t ( WITH STONE AND WHICH URA114iT INTO An APPROVED SEDI11ENT TRAPPING -7 7967 DEVICE ` �/,/1//I P17; �'^ r) „ s PERIODIC INSAEC'"e^I ,. +� •FLOE❑ na u.TE.'+dN._ .�_ �_ r'HJ. L➢cA 11111x1 lA Drowln Number 00 :f,L _ ___ _. \ AFTER EACH RAIN --- \1\ ll/ 9 �� /O / , � - 3 �' , STABLuZU CONSTRUCTION d/�P :"W." Y i 11 11 5 ES W ES ,S RATIM U AIC49) sr9[L unPu XESDPtFs wlsanora swu¢ ---- :'Q\" ✓G' O i.N1 gANLE I , 1 i MEV IWI( :� \�/ J l✓..1.{ �I) ! vp � ;� _ r`'' %0 \ r New 5 ork GwdehneR for Crban Pap 5A N Apn: 1997. Fourth Prrnme '' Q7 ty@,.S sheet of . \ I Erosion and Sedifnem Co irol r'�'iisiS�`'a� 5 10ONALY,,A \b ghan Pmj..t Number 20 0 20 40 Michael"1t:y"1 VI N.Y. Profecelonol Engineer 25085 SCALE IN FEET No.072072 \...\25085\cad\1d\planseA25085_PLOT.dwg L.\25085\cad\Id\plonset\25085_PLOT dog PLANT LIST i;Cor, ��=,� OR DEADMAN (TYP.) KEY BOTANICAL NAME Ca'MONNA'E SIS " FV`��JJ HARDWOOD STAKES BFLADE TRM FP PRAXINU5 PENNSYLVANICA 'AUTUMN PURPLE' SUMMIT GREEN A514 2-21p," CAL _ - GT GLEDITSIA TRIACANT405 'MORAINE' MORAINE HONEY LOCUST 2-211," CAL TREE PIT , u 01a1N'EIJTAL TREES ROOT BALL AC AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS 'CLUMP' CLUMP SP4ADBLOW SERVICEBERRY I0-12 HT.G'"w,a„ - re}Ir i GUY WIRE CK CORNUS KOUSA 'CLUMP' KOUSA DOGWOOD !SINGLE STEM) 2MPkp' CALLA".1i1 _ 1 MR MALLS 'ROBINSON' R05INSON CRABAPPLE $-241? C - - i µ = 1/2 INCH DIAMETER coN1FER6 '" ; 1 BLACK REINFORCED Engineering & Surveying P.C. Plan RUBBER HOSE PN PINUS NIGRA AII6TRIAN PINEi," 'Hi - Transportation PP PIGEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE 3yHT Ii. ,,11 j V b I Land Development SI AND GROUND COVER L r THREE STRANDS /JGAUGE TWISTED GALVANIZED STD STEEL WIRE Environmental Services CA CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA 'HUMMINGBIRDHUMMINGBIRD SUMMERSWEET LIe �Hu� - / / _,-' I h \ tStreet IG ILEX GLA SRA INKBERRT I' 15 ILEX GLABRA 'SHAMROCK' SHAMROCK INKBERRY I rTAryy) A 1 �_ rl _ �� / 301 Nott dy, J6 JUNIPERIS C 4INENSIS SARIGEMIP SARGENT JUNIPER N♦3 VA)A �i /" ' Schenectady,NY 12305 _ 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 BEACH PLUM c _ 1 i �" __ r i� TRUNK RARE SHALL BE SET 2" PM PRUNUS MARITIMA _ - RU R05A WICHURIANA 5 " ='� USHED MEMORIAL R05F - TO THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD' EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 14-5 L�T. r I - - _ , r " - FINISHED GRADE �� / ABOVE THE ESTAB VD VIBURNUM DENTATUM ARROMWOOD V113URNUM 1 3.4 L // t / / �- �' , � � 'yu`h y' � 1 / / � � / ' EXISTIN TREES�� Owners: I�`I, , . ✓ / / TO REM"PIN'(TYP. l� T/ Robert Chiapetta(Lot 4) _ — !/ Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) 1GAFLII, ' I _ 5 9� - / / - I ) 3" PINE BARK MULCH, DO NOT p - moi' EXISTING WALK A D BENCHE5 TO RE AI "I. e I, � � - - N-,� � "1,1 E P' -, L�� , ' " � � � Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) JiJNCTI OII � i �" Y"` � 1 PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3" OF TRUNK D'�;; f� �, - ��' tv = ,y a '" 1 A , ' �' �m �"y ' \ � \SEI- 1 \ SLOPE ro FORM 3" HIGH SAUCER.NorOLforkProperties lnc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) EXISTING SHRUBS TO REMAIN (TYP;) I I 2"X2- HARDWOOD STAKE Applicant: OR DEADMAN Laker Development Group,LLC (3 STAKES PER TREE) TIGHTEN AS SHOWN PLANT BACKFILL MIXTURE. r- — - UNTIE AND CUT AWAY BURLAP IGT Il " / l FROM 1/3 OF ROOT BALL (MIN); I !�/��/ /.(// IFEFiWRAP IS USED, REMOVE COMPLETELY 12 RW -r "� " T�I:"� I I IS SIT ROOT BALL ON HOLE - THREE TIMES ROOTBALL DIAMETER EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL I 2 MR OR ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE , � I Wlhi SLOPED SIDES I RW LOAM & ,SEE[ - s w a- + i Evergreen Tree Planting 6/03 li + + + + L„I - + + ++ + + + + Source: VHB�I. + + '+ ,1 + + < al-'- - I N.T.S. + - Y �`. _ REV LD-604 2 MR 8 VD _2 MR __ ___12 15e VD __ -_-. --- 8 VO I HARDWOOD STAKES --2 -- - - - -- OR DEADMAN TYP.) _ LOAM & SEED 13 RW LOAM & SEED - II TREE PIT VGC —' i ROOT BALL LANDSCAPE NOTES ”' 5 CA --- LOAM & SEED I L M SEEPGUY WIRE iRAF I,IJ • . - -__. - __._ ___ _— __ _ __ -__ _.- -- 18 PW & 1 2 INCH DIAMETER I. ALL PROPOSED PLANTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE 6TAKED CAREFULLY -- - - / ( ) BOX I FP I �', HOSE ABOVE FIRST BRANCH AS 5HOUN ON THE PLANE FOR FIELD REVIEW BY THE LANDSCAPE BLACK REINFORCED RUBBER ° 10 IS I S Plan ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IA 2 R THREE STRANDS OF /j10 GAUGE Z CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES I t1 " TWISTED GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE AND NOTIFY OLLNERS IRE SENTATIVE OF CONFLICTS. - A 3.NO PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AID 2"x2"xS' HARDWOOD STAKE 3 STA P IMMEDIATE AREA r irY STAKES PER TREE LETED IN THE MMED f£ n ( ) OONS1RIlCTION HAS BEEN COfMP N/,rrnm` '2 � , 4.A 3-INC4 DEEP SHREDDED PINE BARD SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER I = ALL TREES AND SHRUBS,AND IN ALL PLANTING BEDS,AS SHOWJ ON THE PLANS,OR A6 DIRECTED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. II A S.ALL TREES SHALL BE BALLED AND BURI_AFPED,UNLESS OTHERWISE _)' hr , R ,q A r"' " �-" ° LOAM SEE[) TREE SHALL BE SET PLUMB, NOTED,OR APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. I �I• II - - I T I AFTER SETTLEMENT &.FINAL QUANTITY FOR EACH PLANT TYPE SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN.THIS NUMBER SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE IN CASE OF ANY - / , cr DISCREPANCY BETWEEN QUANTITIES 5HOWN ON THE PLANT LIST AND 3 PN "LO M & SEED -EN/ TRUNK FLARE SHALL BE SET ON THE PLAN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT AN7 I . 'MUrCH (TYP.) r 2' ABOVE THE ESTABLISHED DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE NLLMBER CP PLANTS SHOUN ON 3' MILL H CIRCLE FINISHED GRADE THE PLAN AND PLANT LABELS PRIOR TO BIDDING. I 7-PM ' \` 3" PINE BARK MULCH, T.ANY PROPOSED PLAIT SUBSTITUTIONS MU57 BWIE APPROVED IN ° 5 I}1'�v NOT PLACE MULCH WRITING BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. - = Ny,.� WITHIN 3" OF TRUNK / IOU�CA e. ALL PLAIT MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE r>, " SLOPE TO FORM BPECIFICATION6 OF THE "AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY I - T 3" 3" HIGH SAUCER yy�-�J+ 4 REN610N5 PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 STOCK" BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. �— E� 1 A � PLANT BACKFILL MIXTURE. 9 ALL PLAIT MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE YEAR m + MITI 3 REYI6ION6 PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 FOLLOWING DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. '•° �� I\ / nexsiws PER ToxN or wu,xan eouusxrs 4/1/Oa IO.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY -1 O . ' - -- i- \ SNOW FENCE ERECT SNOW FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE OF THE TREE.'"ys pR O T'=•.,{ / 1 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE VEHICLES OR MATERIALS WITHIN T �� PROPOSED CVS �� UNTIE AND CUT AWAY BURLAP _ � / / FROM 1/3 OF ROOT BALL (MIN);N° Rana.^ Dete cPVa W";"� IF SYNTHETIC WRAP IS USED, LANDSCAPE AREAS.AN7 DAMAGE TO EXISTING TREES,9Htd1B5,OR i_ f " ."" r ,'� ' / / ��, REMOVE COMPLETELY Designed by Drawn by Checked by LAWNS SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITION ^g-V _ € LO M & SEED °' I LOAM & SEED r'i �y m �, , ,,. DMC DMC MWJ COST TO TINE OL NER '�`• ;`,� I , „ �;/ ` , _ _ = BUILDING AREA ,= ->J CAD chemred by approved by "'�"` I SIT ROOT BALL ON EXISTING DMC MWJ It AREAS DESIGNATED "LOAM ° SEED" SHALL RECEIVE 6" GF L0A1 4„DG I ° `_ } ", -2 fey UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON sem" Dole PROTECTED 14 467 SF. r COMPACTED SUBGRADE 1/19/04 BE PRO'fE - ^HOLE - THREE TIMES ROOTBALL DIAMETER -ED I 'gnilP �0'a J. 'T • - WITH SLOPED SIDES E1ER Project Tine WITH E IED SEED MIX LFA OVER 2.1 SLOPE SHALL } � WITH EROSION CONTROL FABRIC. �u1 _ I 12 15 12. LOAM AND SEED ALL AREAS NOT OTHERWISE TREATED. LOAM & SE qj I ' n„ + C Proposed Retail Development 13. THIS PLAN 15 INTENDED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES ONLY. �i1�1 • .1 Tree Planting (For Trees Under 4” Caliper) 6/03 REFER TO SITE /CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL OTHER SITE CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION. 1 L 3 TPN - • N.T.S. Source: VHB I I I RFV LD_6D2Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 Mattituckjown of Southold ° . - Suffolk Co., New York At I.tuid forI I 1 10 IG . • s TO I Site Plan Review 25 JS LOAM & SEED . 4 ° :. 3 IG I I-C AM & SEE Q Not Approved for Construction 3 PN 18 IG 8 J I • 2 CK Prewmy Me 1 12 JS - - 4 PM N L4 MA 7 PN Landscape Plan II IS m LOAM & S6Eq Dr"wmg Number ��ounir. }' �oau�Zfnn1, = OF N awowrml.c >, -""'ur io' nni ni °° -.,"„rni 'nr n - �5•�::F.A,Y'l. d(j..;p�: C-6 20 0 20 4041, T� I_, I PP FP I FP _ ' p - ' ?: Sheet or ,.,, '�—'�!a--- �— — ^'^�J^y '-1, / • '_�� 3 PP 4 PN 4 PP SCALE IN FEET L PN 3 PP .3 PN 2 AC \�'' I AC �'., SS,/O . .... •GX��`: 6 10 IFP L,-, LOAM & SEED LOAM & SEE - rl ,yp NAL EN E ISTING tREEy---- 11 3 PP I PN Michae�wU:'7ni{�l�ma Project Number T REHAIN. ('FYP.)' i /� N Y. Proresem"d E"gmeer 25085 ,\ No.072072 \...\25085\cad\1d\planaet\25085_PLOT.dwg i I L \25085\cad\Id\plOnset\25085_DETdwg CAST IRON'SANITARY SEWER' COVER FlPAVED AR ,2 (MIN.) SLAB PAVEMENT SECTIONS COMMON FILL TRAFFIC BEARING EA LANDSCAPED AREA Engineering & Surveying. P.C. VM SEE APPLICABLE TREATMENT VARIES ALL SLABS & WALLS LEACHING POOL Transportation COMPACTED GRANULAR LL ORDINARY BO ROW REINFORCED 6- THICK (MIN.) went 24• Z' Land Develo SAWCUT CONCRETE CURB p 1' CHAMFER Environmental Services TACK COAT 20 DEPTH AND SURFA = 8 °° PROPOSED SIT. TREATMENT VARIESCE CONIC. PAVEMENT 301 Nott Street e ss. SLOPE VARIES- 2,500 PSI CEMENT INLET 1.5' / Schenectady,NY 12305 CONCRETE IF CURB 1 /I I$ SET AFTER BINDER } T 6• 6• 518 370 8602 >£FAX 518 370 8606 so COURSE 15 IN PLACE FLOW LINE OUTLET ] PE °_ > -WARNING TAPE : dVPiP Ipr SEPTIC TANK iNo �e 4gPF ^o Asd jar�n O INLETS 5' OUTLET 15' ly• 15' ° _z t, ,w a o 4� �.9. off$ 9 . 1 1f 7, Owners: 6• PVC -L e• J- Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) as v : P f;•°' ,°$$. *B• ?.ap"Wn., (SDR-35) n a 8 n < d@ - gip. i 4 .;Str g� d'' �- (5DR-35) HAND TAMPED HAUNCHING (TYP-) 4.5 ® Norddbrk Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) _CVCOMPACTED BEDDING EA o °fir Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) F., .., m 12- COMPACIED (u, 10 MIN. SUBGRADE Plan view Applicant: 6' 6' 12' Notes: TMIN-3 COMPACTED GRAVEL section view Schematic Septic Tank and Leaching Pool Layout Laker Development Group,LLC (i$' MAX. STONE SIZE) 1. WHERE UTILITY TRENCHES ARE CONSTRUCTED THROUGH DETENTION BASIN BERMS OR OTHER SUCH SPECIAL COMPACTED SUBGRADE SECTIONS. PLACE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH MATERIALS Notes: SIMILAR TO THE SPECIAL SECTION REQUIREMENTS. I. INLETS ABO OUTFT DROP T ASSEMBLIES SHALL 2 USE METALLIC TRACING/WARNING TAPE OVER ALL PIPES. EXTENDS A MINIMUM OF 18' INTO THE LIQUID LEVEL. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT TRAFFIC BEARING 3 FOR HOPE PIPE, DIMENSION IS 24 INCHES. SLAB TO SUPPROT H-S-20 LOADING. Utility Trench 8/03 Concrete Curb (CC) 6/03 Septic Tank Detail N.T.S. Seerce, WE 0 300 N.T.S. Sourer. VHB REV HD 40+ N.T.S. Sourer. MIB LD 6000 PSI CEMENT 114 0 18- BOTH WAYS CONCRETE (TY7E) 7TOP AND BOOM A.% FV CHAMFER BITUMINOUS pF pU1E ,II CONCRETE I 21i PAVEMENT (6 CEMENT CONCRETE Eg1E RTI'' 1 (6" IN VEHICULAR AREAS) W . MESH (6x6xW,.4xWi.4) TRUNCATED DOMES A6( " r „ MT SHEETS - CENTER DEPTH AT ALL CURB AND r� CURB e' VARIES TRANSITON RAMPS TRUNCATED DOMES Nyv AT WALKWAY TO •;, ': COMPACTED - Ak' ' 1 1" CHAMFER TOOLED JOINT FINISH GRADE GRAVEL tiaA'Q' ROADWAY RAMP •Pc/.I, 4' CEMENT CONCRETE1 6' REVEAL 1 �j• MA%. (6- THICK IN VEHICULAR AREAS) wG s ,•}( .F;1/'::; •' �,.•• °.'a'" •"• `L FINISH J. % MIN x. CURB VARIESCOMPAC ,,�,• o g -� PAVEMENT ,4�.x ' 9° 6" REVEALN�SE SUBGRA ED 12- �s> r:.':o .• `n> a 8 BH- oo�o 15% (MA%) o°®°f a 3 �.° FINISH 1'D%WAX.) E UP MAX. _ 4 PAVEMENT SEE NOTE 9. ova boa ° r Not.: cls B' COMPACTED O AREA OF COLORED SURFACE GRAVEL 1$' MAX. �x .• tea' `� 4 0® aoP ° ( , ' Q� ub-d9' 1 SIZE OF DUMPSTER PAD TO BE AS INDICATED ON PLANS STONE SIZE o4rt . .-. . - - COMPACTED - W.W. MESH Z CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED NO MORE THAN AREA OF COLORED SURFACE o a o 'Q / 40 FEET ON CENTER AND SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED 0 o Es 12- 12' SUBGRADE ,T'I,�yb FLAT SHEETS, OVER THE LENGHT AND WIDTH OF THE PAD. ...(.. o0 o° Try 0 SeCMOn COMPACTED CENTER DEPT( ��xxxp::yyypppsss�� 1 Compactor Pad 6/03 I O o o +Ir,-yus Tr" �,,,r I I SUBGRADE OMPACTED GRAVEL •zn;E_° ° Tvs oz TBONGTED DD,T®9 TRUNCATEDDOMES (1YyC MAXTONE SIZE JOINT SIGN 0 o°$z,5• Ph1/View) (Profile) N.T.S. swrcr VHB REV LD_7,2 ----�zss'm• I�6s-�I� ) section 'DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER To CENTER 11¢' BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE TRIIN Planyi O) TaIMCA-fila) 169 (Plan View) (Profile) Notes; Notes: SEA - - --- -LANT 2>rA" BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE 'DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER 1. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SLOPES 'SHALL BE 1.5 (1% MIN.). EXPANSION JOINT SEALANT _ Z THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE of ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CWRB RAMPS SHALL BE 5% 1. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT $ $ o�°°° O A °O 4`a 12 COMPACTED GRAVEL Noten 3. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE J.5%. MIN. 30 FT. 0 C. WITH PRE- Notaa; o ° ° °a FORMED EXPANSION JOINT 1. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS •• r a ,a 4. A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN &o ° o9a 1 THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE 1.5 (1% MIND. FILLER & SEALER. °ate ^ AT MIN. 30 FT. 0 C WITH CONCRETE - g o ACCESSIBLE ROUTE RIE . SEE NIS, UTILITY POLES, TREE WELLS. SIGNS, ETC.). CONCRETE o SIpEWAF 2. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 51 5 CURB TREATMENT VARIES. SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE 2 PROVIDE TOOLED CONTROL SIDEWALK PRE- FORMED JOINT FILLER. 3. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 7.5% JOINTS AT 6' O.C. )4- PREFORMED )f' PREFORMED ° 6. RAMP, CURB AND ADJACENT PAVEMENTS SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDING. 2. PROVIDE TOOLED CONTROL EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4. A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN ]. TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION FOR RAMP SECTION CONSTRUCTION. 3. PROVIDE BROOM FINISH IN JOINTS AT 6' O.C. BLDG. FACE. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE (LE., HYDRANTS, UTILITY POLES, TREE WELLS, SIGNS, ETC.). BUILDING FACE. FIXED OBJECT, B. MERE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE LESS THAN W IN WIDTH (EXCLUDING (CURBING) A 5' x 5' DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO FIXED OBJECT. 3. PROVIDE BROOM FINISH IN OR CONIC. SIDEWALK SECTION Staxidard Duty Flexible Payemeat 5. CURB TREATMENT VARIES, SEE PLANE FOR CURB TYPE. PASSING AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 200 FEET, CURB. OR LONG SIDEWALK DIRECTOR PERPENDICULAR TO 6. RAMP, CURB AND ADJACENT PAVEMENTS SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDING. 9. ELIMINATE CURBING (OTHER THAN VERTICAL CURBING, WHICH SHALL BE SET RUSH) WHERE IT 4. CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BECURB, Nate: 7. BUILT UP CURB RAMP SHALL NOT PROJECT INTO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC LINES OR FIRE IANES. ABUTS ROADWAY. 4,000 PSI-TYPE ➢. Expansion Joint Data Expansion Joint Data 9. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY N11H ADJOINING SURFACER. 4. CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND WILL BE REVISIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 10.DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJOINING SURFACES. 4000 PSI-TYPE IT BASED ON THE RESULTS OF FURTHER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS. Accessible Curb Ram ACR e '13' 6/03 Accessible Curb Ram ACR T e 'M' 6/03 Concrete Sidewalk 6/03 � REMSIONS PER NYSDDT COMMENTS 5/18/04 Ramp (ACR) Type p (ACR) yp Monolithic Concrete Curb (MCC) & Sidewalk 6/03 Bituminous Concrete Pavement Sections 6/03 Q 'SMSONS PER To. OF SOUTH. cOluwTS 4/1/04 N.T.S. source: WE 0907 N.T.S. Swrce: WE 0812 N.T.S. Sourer. WE LO-421 N.T.S. Source: WE 0_420 MT.& Scuna, NIB REV W430 1 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 No Revision Date ppvd Designed by DMC Drawn by DMC Checked by MW BENDS B C p E F BENDS B C D F J Table Of Dlmenelone 10 CAD Checked by DMC Approved by MWJ @' :3{9e•„ E 6" 111/4' B- 15" 12' 24- 12- 6" 45' 8. 30' 12" 24" 14' Scale Date ,21 1�4n 'D QD- .fYp� NJ 6' 22,/2' 19" - 13" G' 90' - 30" - - 27" AB Noted 1/19/04 \ pE 0,11E TRUNCATED DOMES / R Y- PRECAST BUMPER B- 111/4' 20- - 12- B' 45' - 30' - - 24- Prp7ect Title _ OR FACE OF BUILDING 8' 221/2' 22' " 1T B• 90' 38- - - 36" zBltl'' R ROADWAYWALKWAY po �� r 12" 111/4' - 30- - - 15- 12" 45' 40" 40' Pl'OpOSeid Retail D('iVeilOpeil'Ilt'illt ACCESS AISLE TRUNCATED DOMES AG Sip F/��J lEl s; - 12' 221/2' 35' AT WALKWAY TO •H��"nti;• `nom OE II "4' 4- BLUE LINER SEE DETAIL of v ' ROAR PER MANUF. 25" 12" 90' 6D' 52' ROADWAY RAMP "AGp GE Rp �\ , 24. ON CENTER Bends :, ;c4;,; �, .:.. �6yB �� : *.: ':. . , : • •:• sectiBn Lh Block 2e f Lots 1 2f 4f 27.1f 28-30 " '.)::^i'1• i'::•:4Q�.•�!' AG yJ� ,.;•�::'"[::n+r' •: (: '¢� EDGE OF PAVEMENT I 1 LANDSCAPE r :•';�;;• ;'•. p ;6;+;%4'� .VTC OR FACE OF BUILDING B _ r C D p Mattituckjown of Southold AREA (TYP I ", 'Sr. " ', T r '•�, r 1', � � 1 ns RED •1 '�ykt p ^yl. - � Suffolk l/- /� 4' SOIL Jul1011l llo., New York r^�^ ��4 w ��•° N Pi DIA. PIN DOWN HOLES IN Plan UNDISNRBEp sec[IOn 1-1 lq 4 (2 SIA • I \, , v.. ;/.x 1 w ewDQ W UP MAX. 5 NIn9N AREA OF COLORED SURFACE .'i�',:;i.•g SEE NOTE 9. BLUE SKID- FOR No. 5 RF➢AR Issued for RL515TANT Table Of Dimensions N. aa" AREA OF COLORED SURFACE so PAINT (SLOPE TEES G H J TEES Yi UP MAX aryl , '• °0~' lr - 6'x 6'x 6' 12" 24" 2f 18" 12'x 12'. S' 12- 24' 2L" 10' SEE NOTE 9. I o 0 A = 1 D O o Tme 02 \ ,cP9- _ 6 x B x 6 ,rx ,2'x B• - 24' Site Plan Review zim o 0o 002 " f-6" +I 3'-0' V_6- B•x B-x B" - 24' 12'x 12'x 12' 36- 36' TRUNDATEDUDME6 TTElticAEDDOME9 I�Wi'•-255',w• ~oB � M1' 2' (Plan View) (Pmfile) TRUNCATED DOMES TRONCATEDDOME9 9' (MIN.) 8' MIN. Plan Vl¢W Not Approved for Construction Tees H -� • 0IMEN51ONs ARE CENTER TO CENTER fig.liew) (Profile) 'DIMENSIONS ARE CENTER TO CENTER '2� G. ' Drawing Title Nates: Notes: Detail 3" WIDTH WHITE DRIVE OR CUT PIN J�l4 RUSH WITH CONE. L THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE 1.5 ALL MINBE 5 1. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMP CROS,.S SLOPES SHALL BE 1.5 (1%MIN.) ACCESSIBLE PARKING 6'-0' Site Details 1 Z THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 5%' FINISH UNDISTURBED 2. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXCLUDING CUIREI RAMPS SHALL BE 5%, PAVEMENT PROVIDE TWO 3. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE J.5% 3. THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SLOPE OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CURB RAMPS ISHALL BE ].5X No. 5 REHARS Plan section b2 4. A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MAINTAINEDED AT AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN 4. A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET CLEAR SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ANY PERMANENT OBSTACLE IN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE (I.E. HYDRANTS, UTILITY POLES, TREE WELLS, SIGNS, ETC.). ACCESSIBLE ROUTE (I.E.. HYDRANTS, UTILITY POLES, TREE WELLS, SIGNS, ETC.). No[m: +SLOPE K' 5. CURB TREATMENT VARIES, SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE. NOfae: 5. CURB TREATMENT VARIES, SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE. ~ B. RAMP, CURB AND ADJACENT PAVEMENTS SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDING. 6. RAMP, CURB, AND ADJACENT PAVEMENTS SHALL BE GRADED TO PREVENT PONDING. 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO EDGES OF 4" PAVEMENT STRIPING. (�/�� ,�� 1. PROVIDE BLOCKS FOR TAPPING SLEEVES, DEAD ENDS, GATE 7. SEE TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION FOR RAMP CONSTRUCTION. N S�+ VALVES, AND VERTICAL BENDS (SAME SIZE AS REQUIRED FOR J. TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION FOR RAMP SECTION CONSTRUCTION 2, ALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4' WOE SOUD BLUE PAVEMENT B. WHERE ACCESSIBLE L BEES ARE LESS THAN IN NOT (EXCLUDING CURBING) A 5' x 5' B. WHERE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ARE LESS THAN 5' IN WIDTH (EXCLUDING CURBING) A 5' x 5' MARKINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TEES). PROVIDE ANCHOR RODE AT V1]iTCAL BENDS AND GATE LL PARSING AREA SHABE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS N ALS NOT TO EXCEED 200 FELT. VALVES. 9. ELIMINATE CURBING AT RAMP WHERE IT ABU15 ROADWAY, EXCEPT WHERE VERTICAL CURBING IS PASSN T AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED AT INTERVALS NOT . EXCEED 200 FEET. INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE INSTALLED AND SET RUSH. 9. ELIMINATE CURBING AT RAMP WHERE IT ABUTS ROADWAY, EXCEPT WHEELIE VERTICAL CURBING IS 3 E' STALL WIDTH REFERS TO e' CLEAR BETWEEN INSIDE Sloped Side Elevation 2. CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED AGAINST PIPE BEYOND INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE SET RUSH. EDGES OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS. FlT11NG, `SP /I// Drawing Number m. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTRAST WWALLY WITH ADJOINING SURFACES. 70. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY PoTi ADJOINING SUIRFACES. N`,It_OF:�Re AxY+ 3. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 P51-TYPE I /xP, /per% C Accessible Curb Ramp (ACR) - Type 'B' S/D= Accessible Curb Ramp (ACR) Type go' 6/03 Accessible Parking Space 6/03 Concrete Bumper 6/03 Concrete Thrust Block 6/03 - *,'off 2 ,9�' �] N.T.S. Houma: WE LD-501 N.T.S. Sea..; WE In_s03 N.T.S. Sour- We REV LO 952 N.T.B. Sources WE M417 N.T.S. Sours. VINE L01'fio �'p i 90 / ;9 c Sheet of 7 10 Michael W.Junghans Pr.,.& Number N Y Prafe:elonol Dallas., 25085 No.072072 \...\25085\cad\ld\plapsct\25085_DET.dwg i r\25085\cod\Id\plonset\25085_DET dwg PARK of BRAD MAY BE VELEEB TO STEM.FLAT PLATES cp6gEIR LWO) OR END BELTED THOUGH STAND INTO MOLDED WOODEN CAP DIRDEA V CEDAR BOA 1' RD--- Ar^ •« rn'r�T m.T TRUCK VERT%AL LEG PICK UP -- 1 3' SO GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE q' n ANCHOR ANCLE 1 CARE 1NIH PRESSED DOME CAP 5 ]/4x LG Im CINCH DELTA .I f •„ 2' x FA CEDAR BANNING Engineering BL Surveying, P. �1 RAIL FASTENED NIH GALVANIZED as L l) re{_.� ° • q, ADJUSTABLE CLAMP Transportation CAP 51151 PIPE POST r r x 6" OSCAR BOARDS - L FENCE SHIPLAP JOINTS Land Development TYPICAL SIGN g0UN0ED CONCRETE CAP m -I - e' C000 P I (T"E"PETIp CONCRETE FILL ____ Environmental Services 6' pIA. STEEL PIPE FILLED WITH ADDITIONAL DONCRETE CINCH BOLT DETAIL 11•-0" FI"ISH GRADE FOR REAR LOADING l 3/4" NAk ?3 VARIES 'a3 2$' DIA. STEEL POST CONCRETE COLOR SELECTED BY I PLATFORM CINCH BOLTS RECOMMENDED HD D-800 SOI NOK Street (PAINT COLOR SELECTED OWNER ARCHITECT PAINT PRIME AND xNGN psDlup[G }III •,� FINISH COATS TO BE COMPATIBLE 73 1/2" 1 FRONT LOAD '. 1 I. oe0p $Cl1enCCtfld}r,NY 123U5 BY ARCHITECT) WTH EXTERIOR METAL SURFACES. REAR FEED NSm, LOCKABLE y4 O un 111 l ALTERNATE ASPHALT w5TABLIV N' DISCONNECT WTM - 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 NHU4" X$' %1/2„ PLATES \%%':• BOTH w7Ys 12 dN IDP OF A1111 p\ COMPACTED \ CAUYII LTL `COMPACTED 'n FINISHED GRADE A101TIONAL� SUBGRADE Owners: SURFACE TREATMENT VARIES 24 ttP ��I Ca TARR 1 L.LL�� 35 1/4" rr ( ( RIGHT PLATFORM LOADING! 15' CONCRETE FOOTING (TPJ Robert Chia efts of 4 r� P (Lot ) u 12• TYP PLAUIORM (Lots 2 FIAT I-Y=-- � __� � REa ED I � � Northfork Bowl Inc. , (L t 2 ,Dr 31 1/z• 1/4X2 12'-6" LD, MattiNckRealty Associates (Lot27.1) LANDSCAPED AREA rtA �HLATBAR WELDED •j 24• DIA. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT � 1 i0 Fu-BA�fDPLATFORM (NO FENCE THIS SIDE) COMPACTED GRAVEL "I"" B Northfork Properties IIIc.,LLC (LOtS 1, 30) -- --L POINTED IDR VE3635 REINfO T"ICH STEEL Roo TO uMR PAD Applicant: REED CONfAEft - MONCMENT__-__ _ L 16' OR 12' DIA. _ 17' 7 CANT-uP TYP. - Laker Development Group,LLC CONCRETE SUPPORT COMPACTED SUBGRADE 74 108" 76 1/2"-� ,gyp D-600/800 ACCURAT GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS RECOMMENDED CONCRETE ATTACHMENT METHOD N.TS Q7Q8 FOR VERTICAL PACKERS - - - - IAD CBIAATE IIDOSINE6 ""'IUP. `VARIES A a 3MN ^ 03427 - - - - - = :�Y� �.r m 09/O6/OD o 3170718 ROR200D wr"'1'•rMii o°�i,sr' X02-21-02 a 3MN0}427 I °n s Sign Post-Type 'A' 6/G3 Bollard 6/03 Recommended Con. Attachment Method for Vertical Packers 2/21/12 Accu-pack Model D-800 General Specifications 9/5/02 .1 04/19/04 N.T.S. Sours: Amounts Indlueten. with motlmcatlanr. by MIEI N.T.S. Source: vHe REV LO_701 N.T.S. source ONE REV 11_]00 N.T.S. Source Accurate Indumba COMpACTOR ACQUI BITUMINOUS Figure 5A.9 07913101 CONCRETE SIB Fence Details DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS ACCU-PAK PAVEMENT MOCBJORSOO/DHOOD (SEE DETAIL) .m c � ,x,.x..a,•:.c, m„ :.CONCRETE `1aMRn titre,mft,A cubic nYa�I If ACPonIaTYtl CNmPeclar/C"nlalner6 CAST-IN-PLACE NG As al rating 76 per mi , 3 WASI Pilots CURBl1NE (SEE S REB DETAIL) D + 12" .b n WHITE PAINT n 4 WHITE PAINT rd 4, Feed height II DSOD 41/25).�- / r �\ PAM pErp Lc j \ �� nsO Ponadreflon Into consul 12- 2MO �] ee a" °eo o v -' "• 4••.•e•oa. I]"3081)' l v .�'- - -" T.P _ }-�La7 9. TOP6TIES 51tlesM1]Ge ense00">201 DIR�110 x \\y • ,1�: - LBH using sl[lee i1111(P 2. Human tm Iiia. D D my _ LENGTH AS REQUIRED ,O " D : 4 1' IEE STRIPING PLAN) Peeere�rx�c ice:• B Side Mmvlube GX2 �'60 / ?I = nob , .': I� _ _ 4. Handrail-P HIGH SLUMP CLASS A - .,a,pA'ra.* ' .;`v GRAM (SEE NOTE 3) O� (�) 16 Y� 2-D -_r B Wai SUPS rm SIlh 1We 5"12WQ O H or Dar-2x 6 All weld pints in thrust mea are MAX. SLOPE 1.5E �-�- - O i m"a ax11•oe eil2°plates. u.a 12" CONCRETE _ [•`[-` , •a. a anile 4i / . i b> ' n`iF;b. WHITE PAINTED .-"�.. 9 Door p In 4e•x2T• _ .,}., ^_.5n STOP LINE m."o•:mx.< pan8 (TRIP.) ... BasiccpmPecloraPPm,3r5501hc F m Ad iv DIAMETIER •D'=B' 111r/I/111/�M .r T rw.na,xn y V u i 1 Basic--1']40) \ --- 2 Power u"ILeppro%.200We,wilM1 OO �COMP'ACIED SUBGRADE nx . .xr.onvu _•, �• FEATURESR ELECTPICAI AND HYnP CURBUNE 4• WHITE PAINT Y'C CRUSHED GRAVEL 4• WHITE PAINT (TYP.) aIANE --SSLQ ACCUahods..design ER NDkM 4•-ILS secrT ou 1 MOIm6HP,1BDORPM M45ESPho .6010, Mudi anon tleel9neeslelenae 9nticpncapluel ii Ai �WUFPILr Ioi T.E F C 20d23N46P,3 PM1ue,60 HZ tlutllee. 1. CONCRETE FOR SLOTTED DRAIN SHALL MEET THE MATERIAL AND 2 Romolel ey-S al Ed spec Ml sadeaOpItuatlZallon wlNlpm for B• .Fl,P) 'I. AI axae �ue nseerea:Tosco-n.0,"r,: rsrs "; s " 3. gamma KemiOrr15' llog le Male laugh C.NV.osalvensil ee.. CONIIRUC110N REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 501 OF THE NYSDOT um.mr na x:1111^ s .r VE"�..cax edaplsbl",cle-Tom licallon) PRO'ance. a.nlM,Lease end PurcheslnG STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 11x„ 4 Auto Wind,0-Tumrsy5vntcn Pmgnme. S. gem CylmP-I0.RSO"Rt,Is-r QIm4A SIB.Compilers.wM all appllcehla ANSI 245.1 Noting 2. SLOTTED DRAIN SHALL BE GAUGE 16 CORRDGATEU STEEL PIPE ,.r 1ev1w "•• ,=a o•.1r+ 6 Prou Pump-490PM (For QuietOperation)fon) Sefery SendeMs WITH 6 INCH GRAZE AS MANUFACTURED BY CONTECHI Notes: OKNO•l x v.r „, .. , ]. Pro reAdualetl Swkn-Duel Purpose Com rem pmysppnw . x.prex xeo� ox r r.1en u1u.vvn uo.nen -x:,a1, �,�e,. CONSTRUCTION PRO➢UCTS INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL, THE 1. PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE INSTALLED -•.•"x,nnlv[[Lou.: a 7 Gabon Solenoid Valve and Repel VeNe Sal SAS I. TWELVE INCH (12") LANES SHALL BE APPl1E0 IN ONE CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE USED SHALL MEET THE RE0IUIREMENIS FOR ON SIZE WORK IN LOCATIONS SHOWN •^•• 0. Todd n rFame r -SeleeA Service TrelnlnG Beminem APPLICATION, NO COMBINATION OF LINES (TWO - 6 OF BECTON 707 OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, •..o"."I.. A 1v 11 .x,,,...,,« ."„ �,,.,, 1e. Taml Rem Faroe 2e,clD be -(000)S.rvlea Linen INCH LINES) WILL BE ACCEPTED. TYPE I, WiH PROTECTIVE METALLIC COATING, BER MINIOUS .,.. 11, system Precmre(Famiary Set)a so P.S.I. COATING, AND BITUMINOUS PAVED INVERT, GAUGE 16.. 12. Cycle Time-20 Simons 2. LONGITUDINAL CROSSWALK LINES TO BE PARALLEL TO :•e.0 I-A 13. Contolner Full In mills GLEN CURBUNE. 3. SLOTTED DRAINS y2 AND 84 SHALL BE EQUIPPED WTTH FACTORY Painted Pavement Markings - On Site 6/03 n.. es - r SILT FENCE 14. OMck Chen9e BSP lmaraccorcormarnr INSTALLED 'HEFL GUARD', CONSISTING OF ONE-HALF INCH (#13) 311- ".1w TII--F1 I •"Try' w•waam•am..L.' 3. ALL LONGITUDINAL CROSSWALK LINES TO BE THE SAME STANDARD GALVANIZED EXPANDED METAL MESH WELDIED DIRECIII N.T.S. Source: NIB LD 554 Z4 REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 3 RENSIONI PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 LENGTH AND PROPERLY ALIGNED. TO E GRATING .,1,.Y.rLewunmesmruman PUErsa3u � � � � a 1Ts6�mmmPll�riny Compactor 4. CROSS WALK SDESLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 5E P" 4000 PSI CEMENT D WA eunun one 6eeim.Il c.mml P 7/11/01 2 4 1 IIENSICNS FFA TOWN OF SWiHC1D GONMFNIS / /14 CONCRETE (TYPE II) OTIi WAYS N.T.S. source Accumb Industries Crosswalk 6/03 Slatted Drain 03 (CENTERED) V CHAMFER REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 N.T.S. Source' ARE REV 0_553 MT.S spurt.: NIB � SLOTTED-G)RAINe., CONCREIOES No. Revision Data ppvd PAVEMENT Designed by prawn by Checked b Figure 57.13 DMC DMC v MWJ _ Filter Fabric amp Inlet Protection Details NCR CAD mnammad by DMC Approved by MWJ co ETE COMPACTED Pao :mala As Noted Daea 1/19/04 GRANT _ •. _ v •e•n_ __ __- _ _ Prniecx nue COMPACTED SUBGRADE Proposed Retail Developement ^I e ( - -T• �.-.-.-- -- ' G400NBNone: onprn Lr9hnne •.��\\ � $j 1. SZE OF DUMPSTER PAD TO BE AS INDICATED ON PLANS. �Z/.v._ I- 'I v'q MIN ➢-BBD Block 2, Lots 1 f 2, 4, 27.1, 28-3O 1 � 6. FRQNT LDA➢ -J L i 2. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED NO MORE THAN REAR PEED + 1 It"Tl 40 FEET L CENTER AND DTHSHAI1_O BE EDUALLY SPACED LI T A �T+�•It� OVER TIME LENGTH AND W9DTI1 OF THE PAp. eeTc 1V1Sttltttek,Town of Southold � REV Suffolk Co., New York \✓ Dumpster Pad 5/13 . a ... N.T.S. Source: NIB TO a -` FSaeE �I START/STOP Issued for 1$" I.D. GALV. 511- POST k RAILS T n ,,,R anOP ql - ^ r8 I _ SEE NOTE 1. �-- I`+� PACKER v -pha9-A-ml - i N 1.121 'x: DOOR 1 OPENING Site Plan Review Ln _ 1238iN ILS Iq7 1 _ PP 1 ISI li '� lJ 1 1 E D-800 r-5• FRONT Loan Not Approved for Construction L It AI BEAR FEED 27 1/2" CONSTAUCTIONpSPECIFICATION5 DOOR Drnwln9 TAI. Siah .VFW I -II-TER %:'P=C SHALL HAVE AN E'_5 OF 10-55 Su9_A� MA• R: USEC =c9 frlOPi TERM $IPL ICAT IONS ]. CUT FABRIC F .9M A "CNTINJOUS BOLL "d EL-NI'�vJf JE-NTS Site Details 2 12' LOINTS ARE i\E-DEC THEY WILL B_ OVERLAPP_C C TPc FIX- 9T4&2TRUCK D-800 73 PICK UP PLATFORM DDUBLEFACED SAND ELAETED SIGN X13 sTpKE MaTE9`J'_E MILL BE STO+OeRO 2" ^' 'AL9] .'i EILIVALEM METAL WITH A MINIMUM _ENGTH c- 3 FEET • PAINTED WHITE SAND BLASTED DYESTEPN RED CEDAR)BACKGROUND '4 SPACE STAKE' Ev=NLY AMOUNT INLE' ] 'EE- 'ART AI] ]RI'✓E .. • RED(GIVE red)COPY AND BORDER MININIM 1B "Lis DEEP PAGE GLEITEP *r AN -- - LAY BE aRI1GE] • BRICK COLOR TO MA TCM BUILDING WITH THE USE '_F WIRE ME31 BEHP:D THE F=_T-_ �BT:G FOR BUSIEST FABRIC S^ A__ 3E EMBEDDED 103T MII.IVUN -ELS✓ -PCUNE AND 1 BACKFIL_ES _ SHALL 3E SECL9c_1 'ASTENEO 3 THE STAKES AND F93IrE Heal.VME.1'G" ` •e CP2THE r'.B1L]L FDAIE OV-q F C4 B5-191-111 CL AEG112 -E CREST y r. 1 .v.. •''• ML%LHON DRLINI6E AREA l pCgE 1A'rAL'ANLS=J�uIr MODEL D-800 ') E fbml.,(, i MYsallelt) 9u hn dt"as'i �:;tl�,�= Nota: WAOU.Kt 1SUEEV CALL Trnn. eXnG:mral'01HMlu FILTER IECMPIDrzOBP :ALE •�IIII,•� _ „� A'e � 1/4•-1'-0' s YYYA1T1Y1009 to Omwrng Number 1. CONTINUOUS RAILING POSTS D 5. OC. HALL / !!�. 1127 Ny ( MAX.)) CW40 SEE NOTE 1. '^�Fy� .m 3/I D/03 3571279 OB. BE USED WHERE INDICATED ON PLANS. SAA 4 ITiF Di1NC .`SF I Monument Sign 10/99 Handrail 6/03 ms un"ntlSeerme"mC"n""fan Pose 1A]e W' FmnnPnrnm. Modem-800 3/10/031 . 04/19/04 q I e' N.T.S. N.T.S. Source NIB N.T.S. Seem. ACcurct. Indusblss WIN Platform Bdad by VHB rl' •a `� / aof TF 3 nV Sheet N Y Prahrw4 I Sri.... 250' N Y Professlanal Engineer 25a' No.072072 \...U5085\cadild\planset' L\25085\cad\sr\plenmisc\25D85survey dwg Math ywn uthold J/ Site ' h ( �\ Engineering & Surveying, P.C. Water q_' 4, vI 'm 5 01 o \ Transportation Hw w z 'v z Land Development 9s Environmental Services a� 6 25 � �" �� 101 Walnut Street,P.O.Box 9151 coH° pN sYn=-- °cf , �o\�\ Watertown,Massachusetts 02471 617 9241770•FAX 617 924 2286 s � - Owners: ° o �a °®NO s j,OpuS MaP Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) s alaFEET Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) No 0 6 ^� 0 '- � o"w/ Northfo k Properties Inc.,Associates L( (Lots 11, 30 G ) I lzCy' %ti SDEWP� i- - --- ---- w/ 16.°AN Legend II f £ �' O DRAIN MANHOLE Applicant: ® CATCH BASIN Laker Development Group,LLC OO SEWER MANHOLE Q TRAFFIC J P 1� _ OHw i \ - - - ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE ' JUNCTON o r ___-- A O 0• �% \ OB COMBINED i� Box ❑ 5t RQ P U R' oHwl \F - O TELEPHONE MANHOLE 0•�{ V@, � `,/ Y� 3 DESC. THIS SURVEY O MANHOLE SP, OVp,R - ' 0 HH - HANDHOLE • BOLLARD 6! • `, �° MAPL wArl I� O WATER GATE FIRE HYDRANT gocwP�K _ °ovER i ® GAS GATE ca+ ec STREET SIGN -'iE01 Prrc Ll°rrr POLE su � / T t �;/ GRASS o" FwPDE BOH,' RD I L ', o LIGHTUTILITOLE I ' SPEN9tE�E°VG fp LCL 'EAR BEIY�•s\ POLE 3'2a°O _ DD C- GUY POLE s T X BLOCK 2 E '�� GUARD RA N701810"E ' • 5656 \ �` M GUY WIRE r- - Na „ �'�� rs r `, — — 0 MONITORING WELL ° a LOT 30 - 2433 2^°� 1 5.34 PrNe ' EDGE OF PAVEMENT N/F N012TH FORK z 53.2600 RAss srr, 17 4 _ o rs cc s, CON �, '� MAP �' 3r vcc CONCRETE CURB A . P OPERT/oHw 182 . _ _R — — PA kE T —x SID, — — E0P _ 2 � `FAM, ` -?I; VERTICAL GRANITE GRANITE EDGE B GRAVEL LOPED GOP -._ .._ c f64PgOO 2616 --.2314 \ i- RM \ - _ .\ SGE S 5 11III carve RoaowaY se BITUMINOUS BE 2 , z$68GC 3 o I CAN�Ea DNDERPAVEMENT —224,4 Ayr -TAX._BLOGK 2 X BLOCK 2 -� -__ -�—* CHAIN LINK FENCE ce=z5ao I �� LOT 29-'� -2s_ 2463 --. _` . --Y _ LOT 28- 3 zr.u° TRAF w — �3 — — >;-- — — ',za.63 g — - — - — SEWER LINE RAINAGE INE BOX 200' _______ L_ /F NORTHFORK �,� --CC -- oNw F NORTHFORK BOWL I BOWL INC. \ INC. I -onw— — OVERHEAD 'MRE II ° �116s \ GAS rn r , z53z B1r --� \ v z2 se 22 2�f ` E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC I ` N 2523 P coNc \ SEPT[ o s _ ', T- TELEPHONE DUCT _ AVE Ji=24 AD s INTERIM Tex LOT ONESDIP) °Nw ! -c GAS LINE a P z+ 4 m \ 1 2• WOOD LANTER 24 ri, 2,062 I w WATER LINE N 25'12 \ 2$22 CG 25 P2LANTER C 08.6'SEPTIC 2BB 0000000 STONE WALL TREE LINE TAX BLOCK 2 ® i 2d,_ ME'ER Is' OAK \ PLANTER E=25.38• R=z3.2o� —mD'Bz 100-FT BUFFER ZONE LOT 1 z4 za m o o-- 242 SEPTIC C/0 , I zr s 2x.40 1DD'Ra 100-FT RIVERFRONT AREA N/F NORTH FORK A STOCKADE o -FFE=25.42• ` R=2345® 1 1 PROPERTIES I u o { o FENCE FFE=25. 3_ - %a°ONc II (� z - ar coNc , SEPTIC C/O i —200 RA— 200-FT RIVERFRONT AREA 24D 3 j o " eAyC FRONT YARD SETBACK (100 FEET) I R=lass ® ol� I p ari_,opo ' " UNIT MEAN ANNUAL HIGH WATER o A m k2363 II in sFl alOO LIMIT OF BANK Im '� �^ EDP 23s 1 STORY SNn SES SEPTIC C/O NII WFI-IDD VEGETATED WETLAND BOUNDARY N /? _TAX BLOCK 2 A MASONRY 232, R-23}z� -___ .'��" '11I� I M 6 Z N/FDNORTK233, (BOWLING ALLEY & of ---'s� 0223 o IT o G' FORK INC. ' a' j / SEPT[ C/o SEPTIC C/o of iI 41 ' 2Z �. RESTAURANT) D R-2288 A t'r w rn - cn c o R=22.69 f y I o o SHE m (BUILDING FOOTPRINT r m 2222 m, 221, E�"AREA�L�L _ 14 467 SF_ z ) / TAX BLOCK 2General Notes �I / LOTS 1, 2,.--3, 4; 27.1, 28, 222 '-29 & 30 - _ - ' 1) THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND SURVEYS PREPARED -2 -� - BY PECONIC SURVEYORS ENTITLED "PLAN OF PROPERTY AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF z REV PER cvs COMMENTS a/Te/oa ALS o' m. / AREA: 77 801 SQ. FT: O DEED A E 21, y m / ,- 80UTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY DATED MAR. 20, 1996 AND SURVEY FOR NORTH 1 Rev DEsc tax Lor 11/20/03 ALS 6 2D r- {} m (1.7861 ACRES) FORK BOWL, INC. AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY' DATED HORSE SHOE PIT DesI ned by / �aPLE .BrP Nc� a BDpsE snDE PIT °s' BrAyf - /• I / SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGER BRUSTLIN, INC. ON MAY 6 AND OCT. 8, CADcheckedby Drelw°n Dace APPw _ ZONE B _ _ _ - DEC. 1, 1995. Nc �\ a MAPLE e" MaaiR !� ZONE R-40 I - ,,,.- ><2 P Nc I \ ,� �I 2) THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD a by Checked by p ' �. Approved by /1L5 f rs � 12 on e as _- y 2003, F =2 .95 =2 82 - m S1' =30' p°te n[, _29.2003 % _ ~ l 3 'a 3) THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN '31 CONC. X06 n' / APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE Project TOe \, z„ a E 1s' MAPLE 2033 s PAD _ (35 FEET �ti x'4s rs2S o ,I > OWNER OR ITS REPRESENTATIVE. Proposed CVS Store I� 16zf s' OA1 zO5 REAR YARID /" TAX BLOCK 2 {"' Y ❑ n m ^ ° SETBACK I i 4) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD(88) AND ORIGINATED AT AN NGS SURVEY DISK, a e' OAK :, - , TAX BLOCK 2 \ LOT 27.1 s' DAR s"'aAx 10. MAPLE °za LOT 4 rs. GRAss \ GRASS - zo I LOCATED NEAR THE MATTITUCK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF Main Rd. (N.Y.S,R. 25) AS, -- - - Dr N/F MATTITUCK REALTY'- SOUND AVENUE AND 200 FT WEST OF LOVE LANE. THE BENCH MARK IS A DISK ' I� ;'16°� /eh`k-''is' aAH _ _- _- - - - _N/F.,$OBERT CI IPETTO A �Iss' 'b A __ w - IN CONCRETE MONUMENT AND KNOWN AS K 335, ELEV. 15.47 FEET. It _ u OAR\ / it EOP- '- I Town of Southhold oI - AK „ 65� I 5) THE SITE IS SHOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 ON THE COUNTY OF .I ,Ea.az - 5.0. D� On Mattituck Suffolk Y - _,- ( SUFFOLK ASSESSORS MAP: DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 143, BLOCK 2. > Co.,> 4 I,I e" Oax r622 140.00-�_'1Y O_AR--__ iso 569'20.50"W / Ise°ea mr p -®� sTac61 _ _ _ S69'20.50"W 7) 14 OAK ,�„� i II 6) THE SITE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 5 LIES ENTIRELY lMhilN ZONE X (AREA DETERMINED ss h E FND '- CO<JC.MON FN 520'39'10"E fI ,'I TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN) AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD INSURANCE Planning Review °ENCS ?s - - ---�r4 5.54' • °L l9 I RATE MAP FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY, COMMUNITY NUMBER 360813 PANEL 0481 rss9'N mm s IS TAX ST BLOCK 2 �� g SUFFIX G, MAP NUMBER 3610300481 G, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4, 1998. I 6m TAX BLOCK 2 °q N/F LISELOTTE H URIST k's.RD ob mIM I 7) THE TOTAL AREA OF LOTS i, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 IS 77,801 S.F. (1.7861 loo LOT 5 ACRES) Dram Ttle z N/F MARIE A DRAKE it sl mn I 9 yIIn I= o I ce ; fI Existing Conditions 1Jp ]2.r2 i I 2110' W 1.00' FROM Plan 5 I; I. PIPE TO CORNER / DETAIL(NTS) I� � I a0 prowing Number LPW IN CONC.FND :,SCGk, .0;!,ri 30 0 30 60 C-9 SCALE SCALE IN FEET ��%, '' •. (y ' �� Sheer °f ..... 9 10 e,,,nnnl,naat. Michael W.Junghans Pr°lav4 Nonibef N Y Prafasson°I Engineer 25085 No.072072 \\NJEDI\PROJECTS\25085\CAD\SR\pinnmiso\25085survsy dwg i L \25085\cod\Id\planset\25085-PLOT dwg Luminaire Schedule Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Project: All Projects /V Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Lumens LLF Description Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min PtSpcLr PtSpcTb 7 OB SINGLE 14000 0.800 M5335T-750-11300P 175 WATTS A Illuminance IF 0.90 15.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 10 110 10 WP1 SINGLE 14000 0.750 MHIP-C-175-MT-BK (LUMARK) , 11 Engineering 8c Surveying, P.C. -� 2 A SINGLE 23000 0.750 CAL-250-MH-MT-SL-BK-CA42 (MCGRAW-EDISON) Transportation 4 9 A2 TWIN 23000 0.750 CAL-250-MH-MT-SL-BK-CA42 (MCGRAW-EDISON) Land Development u J r Environmental Services "� 301 Nott Street Schenectady,NY 12305 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 1FiAF - M°GRAW.EOISON' Jll^CI,JIJ _jC1nl' ?i- }l it ' ;YJ� �, LV`I 1.,1 .I. 1 �� -� 1 Owners: ;:U„ ❑1. - �. ell 1.� ; / '' ��' (` Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) m -J:F' Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28, 29) CA� ``�'% ?t ,` ,;% -� = - o„^ Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) is ..�....^. =°N=°pRSE` Northfork Properties Inc., LLC (Lots 1, 30) Applicant: Laker Development Group,LLC \ niIiI �'I I � A di -a v 0.1 v0. 10.1 v0.1 v0 0.1 �t--G T0.1 0.1 q� 0.0 0.0 0 1( Er v v vq 0.20.2 0.1 0. � 0 0.2, 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 I'I II11 I00 - � • o v , v v n v v 3� v , �T 00AV 3,- 05 0.50.�� 0 0 0.4 0A 0.4 0.3 �„Q.2 0.2�0 1 .0 _1 0.1 `2 0.3 0 2.1 5.3i 11.2 9.5 `z/=G 1 .7 1 .5 3.1<'s.,7.9 _ 11 .3 6.5 2.7 a °1 .7 2.5 5. °11 .3 8.8 3.4 °1 .7 °1 .2 0.9 0. 0.5 _-DI2I ' _ 2 0.3 0 v 5if 'q � \s v v I d 0 v v v v v v `!]1. v '� v v v �r P v v -" v \ ._c� q v v v v v v v v v v v v v C,- v ' BLIGHTING-LUMARK' 0 ,' 0.1 O,L�_' 3 0.5 1 . 12.4 5.61 8.1 7.9 .8 2.0 1 .9 3.3 7.5 8.3 6.7 3.0 2.1 2.8 6.a 8.2 7.7_ � _2.6-- 1.4 2.3 1 .9 0.8 OI2 0.i1 COOPE �j - - -- - -- _ . � v v G/.UOIK/,F Ilv v v v vp4.v v v w v "ISP _ - q v v v .0 .0 -- 20 - 0_1J (p,�w . 4S115q - .� 2.1 2.6 4.9 4.9 3.3 3.2 5.8 5.5 5.7 ^-s - - - - - - - -d9� ., �o v "v -'d - v v v v v v - v v v v v v v mom, v v q �l "' ^'- 0.1 MD.''U' 9 1 .7 ,2: "2'.4 2.2 1 .7 °1 .6 i .6 °1 .5 1 .4 °1 .6 1 .9 2.0 2:6 27 27 2.6 2.,' °1 .8 1 .6 1 .6 2.8 7.r' ,z .6 2.9 j 1 t ^ fi { - I �. V D r" ceunioEn 9 �•.u3 ''_ �/ '1 d� h, i Ii, �I\ 1_ �, q ° ° q F-5 41 v AHI -i�' ��_ LIJ� v- v -ti ' v v I_I . sJ- 3-. ZAT_.3.O-L0 -- - -�° 4 2.9 1 .2 8.Z_..- si. .� 4.5 A. �}-5-2.1 tr _. 2 - _.._. -.1 0 T-0.3 1 __ i „..,..m. .. .^^,...m,. a.., Jw a .... �'.M,.,..,.,b, ..w„.........F^..m.,. . „,..^.^. • ..�- - • ° v, ia-- i Pil��.�.I v ........v " _ _ __q 2-0 , ..„^ 0 13 2 „6 2.2 1 .21MSEPTI, MFTLPv , racr v1 1 .5 0 .� 1 0 0.1 5 . 8. �F - . cw *L I 1 ' LTTIU 1 ^ - v v )? i b° cYJ v cr -- T-7 4 v o o v v ° ' DB - EN I .• .2 6.2 °1 .5 1 .6 2.8 32 2. .8 04I , �.li ' q q q 0 0.1 0 3 1 2 4 5 .4. 4.5 2.0 1 .5 4. it - WP-1 _ Er E 0 0.1 0.3 °JO °1 .7 �2: °1 .9 °1 .5 °1 .4 5. 6.1 1 .4 .2 7J7_ . _ -. ° .0 3.3 °1 .0 1 .6 5.3 8.6 13.0 �2 0 5. 1 ° v v -c v "o v ,1 Y f „• 0 0.1 0.3 , 8 1 .0 1 : 1.3 °1 .11 °1,2;,�� 3 ,� a L EN SEPTIC C/'0 O 0.1 0.3 9 °1 .5 31. °1 .7 °1 .3 °1.2 4� . � ° 2J �.4 °1 .0 °1 .7 5.3 �/ 4 `' ,a .6 /'0 4.d .1 m q q q q q q q ° r6'Er-1 r - - - r��-� 4 REVISICNS PER NYs00T COMMENTS 6/15/04 q w i � " - v v v v v v v w ty,lo� -51.0 0.1 0'3'� � Z 3 6 ,3'. 3.7 °1 .9 °1 .3 3 1 c 5.0 1 .3 1 .5 2 8 3 1 _ 3.0 $ /r0 4 , .1 �,p a7 _ r T �y4.yw�� q ° -q , '°' REVISIONS PER NYSpOT COMMENT$ 5/19/04 A - s., PROPOSED B I_D NGAR AVwP,1 I ° v o TIC. /" - °„„„, �......,. _. .: 0 0.1 0.� 0 10.9 8: 6.6 2.3 1 .6 r ° .6 ° FEP _- - 4 0 uv+sa+s Pw Tow+ a-s°mewn ceuuwrs 4/1/04 2 '° 9 6.5 1 .5 1 .4 1_9,0 " 0 1 .6 �u I - --- ---- - - -^-°•• ^ `n -- J �01'� 1 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 - 'IrII v - WP.i + .I , v v v v v v v (. I J No. Revlsian Date PPud v v v w v v v a 141467 -SF. 4.5 1 .3 1 .7 .4 2 1 3 N.T.S. Source. VHa D gn wn v care Lum>nalre Lighting Details s/D4 L G g 2;3., 2 1 OI '.1 ee' ea by DMC pru b DMC cb a by MWJ i0 0.1 03 8 146, B� 6.6 " 2. 1 .8 7 r �y + Cr ''v ° v q v � � � v v v v v I O _ cao eneeNea by DMC ^PP'o.ea by MWJ 1 • 0. 0.1 0.3 1 3 5.5 -5: 5.4 2.2 1 .9 7. 34,0 2.5 1 .2 2.4 5.4 5.2 5.5 .2 0 3, 1 Scale Data 1/19/04 ,.. ...' i J �' 1 ° • v Project Title r 0 0.2 0.3 °1 0 2.0 2i 2.2 °1 .6 °1 .9 8.1 47 3.8 °1 .4 2.7 7.2 °8 ° az' ° . 3 .1 Proposed Retail Development .......^... ......, ' _ „L ' 1 3 ` r.S ,T.'..... .,. I �..�` ,,. 0.6 6.6 1 .9 3.1 7.5 8. 2. OC OYS 8-30 MN Ir c 1T5 ' M'r 8K ° . " o. o.a °i 1/ � °h. I °1.3 °1 .3 2.0 7. `' /a ' � 1 , 1 11 3 0 iP.1 Block 2, L 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 2 :^w :.t' it - 1 1 15 '2. '4. `6. 16. v I ` 'w- .. ;; %-° ..w ,....,- 0.9 2 L ° 2.1 2.3 2.8 8.1 . wP 1 9. 5.8 2.2 4.0 6.2 6.0 5.2 1 .5 0.4 ,1 •2 NOTES: of Southold --p - RIC PLAN PROVIDED BY COOPER LIGHTING Suffolk Co., New York 1) PHOTOMET ° I ° I ° ° CORPORATION, 1121 HIGHWAY 74 SOUTH, PEACHTREE, are. - � 1 .4 4.0 6.2 6.0 5.2 4.1 6.3 6.5 5.4 6. X2.7 °1 .9 3.7 5.4 5.4 3.1 °1 .4 0 - 0.1 i I ° v a•• = ° 0' °1 .3 ° 6.2 °5.5 2.3 °1 .0 1 ¢ Site Plan Review 1.1 3 ° .7 5.4 5.4 3.8 4. 8.4 8.5 5 .2 4.1 ' • .4 2' Ora I0. 2) PARKING AREA LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHT IS 1 EFEET ABOVE FINISHED GRADE, WALL PACK FIXTURE v A p-- -v-_ - - ° v v v -WP-4, •q 1 v v• ° v v v p p 1 0.8 9 6. 5.5' 2.3 .1 12.6 13.8 - MOUNTING HEIGHT IS 8 FEET ABOVE GRADE. Not Approved for Construction "fl J7 ' 'L� 'n pruw�°R nue ° El ° ° ° q ° q ° ° ° ° 3 PARKING AREA LIGHT POLES SHALL BE MODEL NUMBER0. 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.9 1 .2 IZ2 A .4 1 .6 1 .1 �-O,,S 0.9 .4 3.1 5.0 12.1 11 .7 4.6 5.0 12.1 11 !5 3.6 1 .2 OA4'� 0.3 0.3 0.210 ..0.1 0.1 ) -- AP-E-20-(A1 & A2)-14-BL MANUFACTURED BY THE ° ° ° ° ° ° ° <0,;6 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ACCULITE DIVISION OF JUNO LIGHTING, OR APPROVED o. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4i 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 .1 2.7 4.3 4.2 2.6 2.7 4.2 4. I 2.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. .0 EQUAL. �J Photometric Plan ° 0 ° ° q ° ° ° Cr d ° ° ,u ° q b" b D q 4) THE COLOR OF ALL LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES SHALL Wall Pack Lighting Details s/p4 Q. ) P--/_/_0'0 0.1 0.1 0.1'L o.1 0.1 0.2 -0.3 0.3 0.3 (j:4 0.5 o.s o.8 0.8 0.5/!+:Ora o.8 0.7-, 0:•4 o.z a1 a1 0.1 o.t o.o o.o o. a .o BE BLACK. N.T.S. source: We = vl v v v ° v v v ° v v v v v ° ° v v q v v E v v v v = o -o -- ° >T-•-i�-- 0. 0.0 0.0 �.9a00.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.! 0.1 0.1 0..1 .0.0'0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. '; _ - ,0 5) CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL REQUIRED ADAPTERS _ _ �/ FOR MOUNTING LIGHT FIXTURES AND WALL PACKS. Drowl^e Number ",q I • ° q mo. ° q v q ° q ° q� ° o ° ° q ° q P „`apN0larrrhr u G;F,p. 0 0.0 a O�-.RO 0.0'' x,0_0 0.0 O.Q 0_0 0.1 0 _0.1 0.1 _0_1 0.1 X0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1'!1E;10.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .p ```�.�PtE,.OW�.... ' I,1 �. SE- 1 bit � ° v ' v ° ° ° q ° v v v ° v v v v v ° v o v � ��' (�.0 0.0\ 0.0 0.0 0.0 /.0_--1Q. 0.0 O.D /GIP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 20 0 20 40 S � - \ r SCALE IN FEET sneer of 10 10 �,-- ' la rJ y r,"1 -t �6 Number i MiLMae1�U a1 Er tiFghans 25085 ii '+\ No.072072 \_A25085\cadUd\p1anset\25085_PLOT.dwg i L \25085\cad\Id\plonset\25085-PLOT RI dwg . �� I r, •'' / a- J i moi' � r ' / � l ,,. '�' _ �� \\ � ra'ir'^ 45't AND VARIES �� ExlsnNo PAVEMENT PROPOSED FACE OF CONCRETE �, rl 5µ1t CURB VARIES 0-2• FROM TC 21 4 1 EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT " 1 - I- IllRB'RAMP (TPE 3A) IftAFHL _ - _ 1 t -� [r pp,, k)1 /� 1 VARIES 5.-6' U R•IC�1111J BTU' r ', wrH" 1. 1I'' I L �-, I, 5 5 E'Cl, ❑( n �N. rl ,�- ,I � L' 'tom oV)�'��I C. LIMIT O SYR-WCUT _ SHOULDER EDGE LINE SIDEWALK u. 1 r tN� .L MOW STRIP I� la1 -In _s \ EXISTING)PAVEMENT Engineering cit Surveying, P.C. 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK .cl ' _ ` �� 1 N4( _ - '_ �--I � � ITEM 10608.01201 TranS]701'tatlOII _��' v W I• _ �/ SAW CUT RESTORE AREAS Land Development entITEM 10403.0903 SI 4' TOPSOIL, ITEM 613.01011, Environmental Services IN - Q J II AND SEEDING, ITEM 610.0203 iiLl-ice 1 . REPLACE EXISTING CU B �i�' �� - ( OIpA �\ ; RAMP WITH CURB RAI-' �'` "� � �' � . CONCRETE CURB 301 Nott 9lreet M ITEM 10609.28101 - _ _ • Schenectady,NY 12305 ( ,YPE 2A) 518 370 8602 8 FAX 518 370 8606 SUPERPAVE HMA TOP COURSE ITEM 402.129101 (1J$)" Jt N IiIVr i y��`Tvf '. Ir/C , ,._ '`UCL "•' LIIA l I _ SUPEITEM 402.198MA (BINDER COURSE RObeCt ChlBpetta (Lot 4) '', _ / Llll - r ` � �,x �( _iJl , 'V '1 r1 _ "1rli "17 IV' l l ( 'V i�� -�,,,' � OP EDS DE01 'ATION � TC i _ - 1 �N j y� SUPERPAVE HMA BASE COURSE Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2,28,29) TO TH TOit�rµM o OT 3G11 3 ` � �— TEM 402.378801 (s') MattituckReal Associates y I Realty (Lot 27.1 -- - T r \af J 1 (PLACED IN 2 - 3"3 LIFTS) ) SOUT�IIOLD� ©.0 1 �� IR TH TOP,�C �.� f I' a nes � � — — �� 1 _� - � � �� Northfork Properties Inc., LLC (Lots 1, 30) _ _ _ 4\ 1 'i —� �lC 1'0 -, IAA F/ I� =- L I( E1 L( )-)� L Y 'L% b ) �" II N _ - - - -- — - ' _ ITEM 17304.1011 (6") EMP LC1N UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION Be DISPOSAL Applicant: ID,tiN i- - µ � /� cC,IF 1E�. tC�� - •� - �C _� - 1I ,ry C ITEM 203.02 Laker Development Group,LLC ' rDIJ,R1 nLIWA LV'u, r _ a�U B P, ( YPE 3A) <�I '\,; EUI �'t. .._ uHUERN EME'' r _ Typical Section NYS Route 25 R/D4 -n. /// 1 p t, RI 11(, I-; N.T.S. `9' - 1 11V%', . ( 1T 1 _. -- _ _._ ._ - - - — _ , 1 ` _ �J 1 r° i i Cf � � � � n , � -1 ,-, VARIES " PUS ''D f' __ _ V� •�IJ�T ��(�� ' I,-i- __ ., / TI r', 2xlsnNG PAVEMEN 3' 5 '` --- .-nliw-- �J" F �,](I T� O�'. : e . �l sloEwauc GA _ ,- J �F 1� - - MARLENE LANE METER - rrrrr-��T h ' DI .a L_ _.-_ ___�. _ -_ _- a • r^1F VC' ,'`� HTER , 4" TOPSOIL. ITEM 121 AS D� P IAX JI IJ F, (T11'7 SEEDING, ITEM 123 LS NYS ROUTE 25 NTLPIL 1_ _ _ PROPOSED FACE OF CONCRETE FULL DEPTH Z � lUCURB VARIES 0 2' FROM PAVEMENT LIMIT 'WCUT �A ® �® �' I® a I. -_.___ ,- EXISTING DGE OF PAVEMENT q WA�FF - O ' ; Ick MLEr — _ ti I_ at _ 1 2' MIN. St EWAtx T _,- - __ _ - _L _ �1-�o__ - ' R } I AIJIkK 1„ II { SIGSBEE ROAD SIGSBEE AND tTOLIiA' E o MARLENE TF FORH', ril v' • FENCE ,, . "EN / FULL DEPTH RTIE S PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, ITEM 105 �.I,.E MC)Nr IfAR[ �EIEaL �: W00 FEET) "` l ,� \. CONCRETE CURB, ITEM 97A I�_y I N SAW CUT 1 T ITEM 205 1Y2" ASPHALT TOP COURSE, ITEM 51FX ENE> L� � �. ,� 1 � '�. 4NA" DENSE BINDER (2 LIFTS) - ITEM 51 F% Ti a r �ci r1-)T. , �'� ��) �a = �� I C SA CUT 6" STABILIZED SOIL -AGGREGATE SUBBASE- ITEM 45 CH .,T Si B _ �j TT UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION ITEM 2AS o= LGT - , rLJ- 7 - t � g �, I Si sbee Rd & Marlene Lane Widening & Pavement Repair Icin = PROPOSED CVS L. ( , :M� L11Y -' _ Irl 111 N.T.S. BUILDING AREA n w -o �.n �= 1 14467 ±SF. \ s1p. ° SEEANOTE CD 3 - `" T' T c_ / OR F�ATl{ER pLANW OR SUNFA� �n KIN ILI -LLEYDALLtwN- i t r AR _ TAX BLOCK 2 t LOTS 1 , 2., 4, 27.1 , 28, 29 & 3,0.. OTKER '•,• w O s PLANTING OR NRF CE DEED AREA: 77,801 SQ. FT. yDETECTABLE -- T (1.7861 ACRES) J / NO I- IAL Kl IG WARNING Tl �I - FIELD 71. TRANSITION AS SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT ITII DOCUMENTS DR TO ACCOMMODATE --U,1 - -- - �'`- - _ _% 1 NOTE: PARALLEL CURB RAW LENGTHS 1_4i, 91 'r �' �J 7 _ _ _�� F --- - -- — -- -- -- ' J � C' � FIGRoc _ � _ THESE PARALLEL AND PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR CURB RAMPS E MAY BE USED AT INTERSECTIONS AND MIO BLOCK LOCATIONS. �� _ No. Revision Dote ppvd 0I''� E F'-- '-t O COMBINED PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR (n '' < ° /�lT .I • I IbVC', CURB RAMP (TYPE 2A1 Dasagmd by DMC Drawn by DMC cmakee dv MWJ SHOE <' it-• CAD checked by Approved by MWJ E ID IT DMC - 'r " -- ---- Q _0 I �N _ - sable 1„�0, Date 6/18/04 o n Project Title - - - MIN.- A � �` ' P 'e Proposed Development I r ti —�-- Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 REAR '\ARG A"C 3L1 (_K TA/; BLOC h E SCTEAC;I{ LOT Mattituckjown of Southold / 1 / /' Suffolk Co., New York TRANSI710N AS SPECIFIED SEE NOTE 3 J F �� .�., � � 5� l —LANDING Fl(FB E R T IN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Issued rar JIT' ."_ _— _ _ / a _ T " F� V ( 7� 1 �f,UR9 TRANSITION E�” µA. f, '�;J l II I _ _-,j xT BLENDED TRANSITION.-/ , L Site Plan Review _ _ SEE NOTE 13 DETECTABLE WARNING FIELD � I "� f'• �' �� I _ �'�; i O0 I �,� _ _ 1 �" V i1 - �' -5r- SIDEWALK" �I'G) 9 ,2 0,E0 W �Il SIDEWALK CURB RAMP/BLENDED TRANSITION �� (TYPE 3A) Not Approved for Constriction 9•�'0J0 W SIF Drawlna Tine ` l J FF CE 5A Curb Ramps I e, e/o4 TAX K (_)(,;I'. Tin T „ N.T.B. Road Improvement CURB RAMP NOTES H Plan & Details 1. THE PUBUC SIDEWALK CURB RAMP STANDARDS DEPICTED HERE MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE FOR ALL LOCATIONS. FIELD CONDITIONS AT INDIVIDUAL LOCATIONS MAY 7. THE SURFACE OF ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE STABLE, FIRM AND SLIP RESISTANT. A COARSE BROOM FINISH RUNNING PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE IS REQUIRE SPECIFIC DESIGNS. DESIGNS MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SHEET TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT FEASIBLE ON ALTERATION PROJECTS AND WHEN RECOMMENDED ON CONCRETE RAMP SURFACES, EXCLUSIVE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING FIELDS. STRUCTURALLY PRACTICABLE ON NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AS REQUIRED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES. 8. RAMP TRANSITIONS BETWEEN WALKS, GUTTERS, OR STREETS SHALL BE FLUSH AND FREE OF ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES (6.4 mm MAX). 2. THERE SHALL BE A LANDING AT THE TOP OF EACH CURB RAMP. THERE SHALL BE A LANDING AT THE TOP AND AT THE BOTTOM OF EACH PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR RAMP. 9. COORDINATE ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIGNS, STREET FURNITURE AND DRAINAGE TO ENSURE A CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE AT ALL CURB RAMP LOCATIONS. GUIDANCE FOR CROSSWALK MARKINGS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IS PROVIDED IN THE MUTCD. Drawing Number 3. LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEAR DIMENSION OF A 1525 mm BY 1525 mm SQUARE. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE AT LANDINGS IS 2 PERCENT IN ANY DRAINAGE GRATES AND UTILITY ACCESS COVERS ARE NOT ALLOWED IN RAMP WALKING SURFACES OR LANDINGS. pa0k,,pAAoaIN,„7 DIRECTION. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP WITH ADJACENT LANDINGS OR A SINGLE LANDING MAY SERVE AS MULTIPLE CURB RAMPS OR PARALLEL OR PARALLEL/PERPENDICULAR 10. WHERE FEASIBLE, E.G. WHERE R.O.W. WIDTH PROVIDES SUFFICIENT SPACE TO INSTALL SIDEWALKS SET BACK FROM THE CURBS, RAMP TYPES 2A AND 3A RAMPS. LANDINGS MAY OVERLAP WITH THE CLEAR GROUND SPACE REQUIRED AT PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL PUSH BUTTONS. SHOULD BE INSTALLED AS THE SEPARATION PROVIDED BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND CURB OR TRAVEL WAY MAKE FOR GREATER PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND 4. CROSS SLOPES. THE MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF CURB RAMPS SHALL BE 2 PERCENT. CURB RAMP SURFACES SHALL GENERALLY LIE IN CONTINUOUS PLANES WITH /4 COMFORT. - RI- I v` MINIMUM OF SURFACE WARP. 11. AT MARKED CROSSINGS, THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP SHALL BE WHOLLY CONTAINED WITHIN THE MARKINGS, THE SIDES OF THE RAMPS (THE FLARES) Cn! 5. THE RUNNING GRADE OF CURB RAMPS SHOULD BE AS FLAT AS PRACTICABLE. THE MAXIMUM RUNNING GRADE OF ANY PORTION OF ANY CURB RAMP SHALL BE 1:12 (8.3 NEED NOT BE WITHIN THE WIDTH OF THE MARKINGS. sneer at 7. . CURB RAMPS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE LONGER THAN 4.6 m. _ ) WARNING REQUIREMENTS. DETAILS DOT NOTE SHOWDROPPEDCURBS EAT BOTTOMS OF CURB RAMPS. DROPPEDLNICURBSTMADYABE SPECFIEDR SPECIFIC DETECTABLE qNAL ENvo`� 6. CURB RAMPS LOCATED WHERE PEDESTRIANS MAY WALK ACROSS THE CURB RAMP SHALL HAVE FLARED SIDES. THE LENGTH OF THE FLARES SHALL BE AT LEAST TEN (10) THE TIMES THE CURB HEIGHT, MEASURED ALONG THE CURB LINE. WHEN INFEASIBLE OR IMPRACTICABLE TO PROVIDE A LANDING THAT IS AT LEAST 1525 mm WIDE 13. SLOPES ON BLENDED TRANSITIONS SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 2% (1 ON 50) IN ANY DIRECTION. 2O O 2O 4O Michae ''W'.'71Ea,ln d, 2508 Number (MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE RAMP TO THE BACK OF THE SIDEWALK), THE LENGTH OF THE FLARES SHALL BE TWELVE (12) TIMES THE CURB HEIGHT MEASURED N.Y 0720 2 snylneer 25085 ALONG THE CURB LINE. SCALE IN FEET No.072072 \...\25085\cad\ld\plaoset\25085_PL)T.dwg IV1:111.ING AUUKESS: PLANN7NC BOARD MEMBE 4' SOF SO[/jy "v P.O. Rot 1179 .lEKll vN R. WOODIHWSF , ¢�p �� :tiourhola NY L1971 tl :dY ,i 1V OFFICE ICE LOCATION: Vv I .I IAN1 ,r ( RVN1 VRS I own Hall Annox lil NNI TH I, PIDNVARDN r �p ° 4375 ,State. Route Z:i [vr.ARTIN 11, SID01{ C1 �� i..or. Main Rd. &Young, A':o_ GF411MV n. PO].OMON tlou ,iv' S(,uthold, NY yr, Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3 VM PLANNING ROARI) OFFICE TOWN OF 5O7 Tl IOLD March 15, 2004 Keith H. Archer, Esq. Harras Bloom & Archer LLP 445 Broad Hollow Road Suite 127 Melville, NY 11747-3601 Re: Proposed Site Plan for CVS Pharmacy Located on the s/s/o NYS Road 25, between Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane, in Mattituck Original SCTM#s1000-143-2-1 , 2, 4, 27.1, & 28 and new merged SCTM#s1000-143- 2-2, 4, 27.1 , 28.1 & 30.1 Zones: B & R-40 Dear Mr. Archer: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 14, 2005: WHEREAS, the applicant, Laker Development Group, LLC, proposes a site plan for the alteration of an existing 14,467 sq. ft. building to retail pharmacy space on a 1 .78-acre parcel in the B and R-40 Zones located on the south side of NYS Road 25 between Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane, in Mattituck, original SUM #'s1000-143-2-1, 2, 4, 27 1 , & 28 and new merged SCTM#'s1000-143-2-2:, 4, 27.1, 28.1 & .30.1 , and WHEREAS, North Fork Bowl, Inc. is the owner of the property known as SCTM#'1000- 143-2-2. Robert Chipetta is the owner of the property known as SCTM#1000-143-2-4; Mattituck Realty Association is the owner of the property known as SCTM#1000-143-2- 27 1, North Fork Bowl, Inc. is the owner of the property known as SCTM#1000-143-2- 28 1 . North Fork Properties, LLC is the owner of the property known as SCTM#1000- 143-2-30.1 and all the properties listed above ar,, located on the s/s/o NYS Road 25 between Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane, in Mnitiluck; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 2004, the final public hearing was closed, and CVS Pharmacy — Page Two — 03/15/05 WHEREAS, on July 13, 2004, the Southold Town Planning Board issued conditional final <cpproval of the site plan prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., certified by Michael W. Junghans, dated January 19, 2004 and last revised June 18, 2004, and subject to fulfillment of the requirements which have been met as follows: 1 On March 14, 2005, conceptual agreement approval was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation for all work improvements as indicated in the letter dated March 1 , 2005, Case Number 04-110P. 2 On January 11 , 2005, approval was issued by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services under reference number C10-04-0004; and WHEREAS, no building permit may be issued until the lots are merged by deed as indicated on the Notice of Disapproval dated 11 , 2004; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met, be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the site plan prepared by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc:., certified by Michael W. Junghans, dated January 19, 2004 and last revised June 18, 2004, subject to the NYS Department of Transportation conceptual agreement dated March 1 , 2005 and its formal approval of the site plan last revised March 11, 2005, and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans subject to a one-year review from the date of issuance of the building permit. Attached is an endorsed site plan. Please contac? this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Jerilyn B.B. Woodhouse Chairperson Enc cc Building Dept. Town Engineering Inspector ps �i 210 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, N.Y. 11952 March 2, 2005 Mr. Keith Archer Harras Bloom 3 Archer LLP 445 Broad Hollow Road Suite 127 Melville, New York 11747 D•_ar 'fir. Archer: On February 25, 2005, in Riverhead, regarding CVS Pharmacy in Mattituck, you again advised me of your concern regarding landscaping around my property and across the street from me at the proposed CVS store. The gentlemen who 4poke3 on behalf of CVS (I can't recall his nama) , stated that the undeveloped lot across from my home haC 'scrub oak' on it and was not attractive. His idea was to get rid of this and replace it with some bushes. I have talked with neighbors and we all feel that what he considers 'scrub oak' is WOODS and we love our rural woods. We have been told at numerous meetings that this lot would not be cleared but that in addition to what was on the property CVS would add additional landscaping. Please Mr. Archer do not let them clear this lot. The trees absorb sound and keep our neighborhood the way we want it. This is a rural area and we do not want it looking like another Riverhead. Thank you for your help in this matter. Yours ruly, Marg t Ann one Z/SAN/ . / ec: Valeria Scopaz,AICP 1/ Town Planning Director Town of Southold 1. �s MATTITUCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE�� P.O. BOX 1056 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11952 February 24, 2005 Ms. Jeri Woodhouse Chairperson Town of Southold Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Woodhouse: Recently we have been informed that the New York State Department of Transportation is inquiring into changing the road configuration and curb cut in what is to be the new CVS in Mattituck. We are also aware that the DOT may reduce or eliminate the park of which we are leaseholders. I write this with the full backing of over 150 businesses in the Mattituck Chamber of Commerce, many of which live in Mattituck and the surrounding Hamlets. The chamber has put a considerable amount of community effort and money into maintaining this park for many years. The park was recently redesigned as an Eagle Scout project. This park has meaning to our community; it is not just another piece of property to us. With that said, we have had conversations with the CVS attorneys and they have assured us that if the park was to be redesigned again to facilitate a new ingress pattern off route 25 that it would not be reduced in size, it would be moved to the west. We have no problem with this proposal, if CVS picks up the entire cost of rebuilding the park. The community would frown upon a reduction in the size of the park. Route 25 is designated a scenic byway and its traffic patterns are extremely important to the business community. An ingress-egress plan that includes an additional lane is out of the question. We do not want our community to look like route 58 in Riverhead. Slower traffic through our hamlet helps our business community. By considering the addition of a turning lane in this location it will make route 25 a four-lane highway. This will facilitate faster traffic, vehicles passing on the right, and in general a traffic mess. We already have a four-lane highway going through our town we do not need another. MATTITUCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P.O. BOX 1056 MATTITUCK, LONG ISLAND, N.Y. 11952 The Chamber of Commerce is not opposed to CVS building a store in our hamlet; we are opposed to redesigning our Hamlet so a CVS can be built. We understand that due to zoning regulations CVS has opted to build around the footprint of the existing building to save the non-conforming use under the zoning code. CVS has tried to short cut the process by using the current footprint which may not be the most viable design for the community, if it includes making route 25 a four lane highway. Instead of going to the ZBA for variances or changes in zoning which would have added to the cost of the project, CVS has chosen to work within the existing zoning which is obviously causing problems for ingress and egress of their truck traffic. As the Southold Town Planning Board you have the authority to make sure this does not happen. We urge you not to approve any site plan that includes an additional lane of traffic on route 25. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Di�) a,.I�� /-- Domenico Mautarelli President Cc: Assemblywoman Patricia Acampora Supervisor Joshua Horton NYS Department of Transportation i I C �\ S cl V la oc) cu�Q) Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: n; '//F`t+ r, As 2 0 V Subject: CVS vrafe� pp ISD SCTM#: 1000 - Southold Town Planning Board Date: Comments: Li • 1 •UL rl, • SHAME ON US Neighbors, Friends Help Us Keep Mattituck A Great Place To Live, Play & Work We Must Stop CVS We have contacted: Honorable Patricia Acampora Councilman,William T. Edwards (631)298-133$ 400 West Main Street Suite 201 Councilman,Daniel C.Moss (631) 298-1200 Riverhead,New York (631) 727-1363 c,a,Supervisor Joshua Y. Horton She is Just as outraged Councilman Thomas K Wickham Councilman John M. Romanelli Justice Louis P.Evans Town of Southold PO Box 1119 33095 Wain Road Southold,NY 11971 Town Hall (631)76.4-1980 Haytnot heard from our elected Townl3oard We the people moat be heard. We do not need CVS with all of the trucks,garbage,compactors and their team of public relations people. They have told us a bunch of lies from day one. We have to think of the safety of oar children graQdchildren altd people using our streets. I always thought public safety was number one. Our streets are used to go to the beaches and Mattituck Park which are opened to the community. 1 I requested a postponement of a decision from the planning board so that the DOT and other factions could meet with the community.This was flatly refused by the board.We the citizens and taxpayer's most be allowed to have input on any projects that so negatively affect our quality of life which very much includes the protection of our children. The town board,the planning board and DOT each separately state that they have nothing to do with the tentative approval. Every one of these people stated that it was someone else's decision. All are passing the back and refuse to take responsibility for the tentative approval 2 At the end of the town planning board hearing,we the residents,homeowners and taxpayers found out that the board already prepared a written approval in favor of CVS. 3 CVS is the first step in changing the character of our community. Tractor trailers and commercial trucks will now he traveling on our residential streets endangering our children who have become accustom to walking to the beach and play ground with a strong level of security. These changes to our community will not only affected Marlene Lane,where the entrances and exits of tractor trailers will take place but traffic will no longer be permitted to exit west from Marlene Lane on to Route 25. How will these tracks exit our community: Peconie Bay Blvd..Bay Ave.,Sigsbee Road,Love Lane,Wickham Ave.and Factory Ave.CVS stated that trucks would got travel throng4 our residential areas. Which one of these routes Is not residential? CVS will impact all homeowners,increasing congestion to the point of making an already jam-packed intersection more crammed and dangerous. 4 The town has decided to piOne parking signs along a section of Pecoak- y Blvd.,Marlene Lane and V Sigsbee Road. Your town board states this is because the parking overflow has r"Pited in a dangerous coaditien,which impedes the seem and maneuverability of emergency vehicles to pass.(Your tower's words!) Are these as parking signs needed for the maneuverability of emergency vehicles? With parking by the beach it would be impossible for the maneuverability of Tractor Trailers and Commercial Trucks. In reality bas anything changed regarding the beach area traffic and parking in the last few years except for the introduction of CVS? 5 What is more dangerous is to allow CVS to bring tractor trailers and commercial trucks into the opposite end of our residential community. These trucks have to head into oncoming tradle in order to tern on to Marlene Lane. This is actually shown on their maps.There are many teenagers in this community. They do tot have the ability,as new drivers,to Judge a tractor trailer heading right into their lane. What about our senior citizens? All trucks will have to esit and enter on Marlene and others on Sigsbee. We can hardly get aeroas to the shipping area sew without the itteressed the traffic CVS will bring to these intersections. We are over- congested!1 do net knew what(bey are thinking and who Is pushing this through. 6 If you wanted to improve your home it would take at least two years or more to get the final permits. This is. being pushed down our thrash with no input from us, We have an Marlene f..aae fifty homes with an iavcstaunt of over twenty five millions that's an avenge of SM,00 for each home.The last home sold for over 5600,000. What do you think your Investment will be worth if CVS is allowed to build?We have been successful in getting our assembly person Patricia Aeampors to join our fight.She is a Msadtaek resident and has been must supportive. I feet we are beginning to gat some support going our way. 7 We were informed that the DOT had approved to have all tractor trailers,delivery tracks,employees and customers enter and leave from the residential streets beeaaw the DOT would not allow exits and entrances on, Route 25. This is a total sham. Our Honorable Representative;Patricis Acampore hat been in contact with the DOT. The DOT told bar that they lave nothing to do with"PIM 8 There must he thought given as to a"best use plat"for our community. The bowling alley site"best use" would be an office building whereby the traffic congestion would be kept at a minimum and there would be no tractor trailers,commercial trucks,commercial garbage,and additional air,noise and light pogution.Last but not least there would be no need for changes in traffic patterns which affect all of the residence of our community. 9 Our residential streets are not the place for tractor trailers and other commercial vehicles.The town planning beard bait only tentatively given their approval. This tentative approvsk if allowed to become float,will impact the quality of life of all taxpaying residents. Our concerns most be addressed and acted upon. 10 I tbought when 1 decided to[Hake Mgttituck my home;I was purebasing a piece of Heaven. Instead I'm having a nightmare, We do have the right to be free of commercial vehicles on our residential streets and overflowing commercial garbage which produces foul odors and rodents near our homes. Further your town board has allowed£VS to put Compactors and Garbage on residential property. 11 If you care about the future of our community,tits welfare of our children and grandchildren,then get on !ward so we can organize and become strong together.Each One of us is like a piece of straw,scattered&boot. Gathered together we can engulf into a flame and our beat will be felt. 12 We have already written to our local editors,and town board. The town board is ant listening to our valid concerto. Now a follow up by you the people will make a difference. Do it today. Remember CVS already has a very large bad start with much money and apparently a lot of important people with important connections backing them. %a I implore you to act now. Contact your local editors,representative and your town board. Let them know that you,the voting taxpayer,will not stand for Matfttuck becoming the next Riverhead and dumping ground. 13 Contact Ed McGlone at(6.11)298 5850. Only if we work together can we stop the town board from putting our children at risk destroying the character of our neighborhood,and reducing the value of our homes while the town board's property values are not affected. TOTAL P.03 P To:Jeri Woodhouse-Chair-Southold Town Planning Board From:Hannah Masterson-2015 Marlene Lane,Mattimck NY 11952 4AI1 Re:Proposed CVS Project-Mattituck August 23,2004 Dear Ms Woodhouse: On August 12,2004,1 received a call from Devin DaPos of the CVS presenting team.Brnno Semon had indicated to Devin that,after the August 9,2004 Planning Board meeting,l had serious misgivings about the plan to locate all deliveries and trash at the southeast side of the proposed CVS store.We agreed that: I.Devin would present the alternative plan to reroute all commercial vehicles to the rear of the store(see sections marked with asterisks on attached memo dated 8/9/04). 2.I would review Planning Board files and speak to correspondents to see if this proposal to reroute commercial traffic would meet with their approval. There were six letters in the Planning Board file:Two against closing the bowling alley;one to close the cut on Route 25;one from a Sigsbee resident south of boatyard complaining about the boatyard,the proposed CVS size and the present and future traffic;one from owner on southwest border of bowling alley about whether the proposed CVS setback would ensure privacy and quiet;one,from a Peconic Bay Blvd resident,that CVS should have a service entrance in the rear,similar to Waldbaums across the street. Consequently I spoke to: 1.Sigsbee Road residents: -#210 south border of boatyard—the residents are part time and have not been out since the 8/9/04 Planning Board meeting.Their adult daughter was aware of their concerns but could not speak for them. 4225 southwest border of bowling alley—approved of commercial rerouting behind CVS store. 2.Marlene Lane residents; 4300 southeast border of bowling alley—many complaints about the bowling alley;pleased about proposed CVS store with commercial vehicle rerouting as proposed; #255&305 directly opposite on east side of Marlene—many concerns about the increased traffic but happier with proposed rerouting than placement on east side of CVS store. The attached petition was then completed on a door to door basis on Marlene,including Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate in the Celic Center on the northeast corner of Marlene and Route 25.A copy of the CVS site plan was used to illustrate the magnitude of the traffic problem under the proposed plan versus the alternate described in my 8/9/04 memo. Note:A letter to the editor in the 8/19/04 editions of the Suffolk Times and The Traveler Watchman states in detail the views of many who oppose the entre CVS project.lt mentions the truck problem as a major concern. The people who signed the petition are not necessarily in favor of the CVS project(some are;some are not),but all agree that they want to not only protect the residential nature of their streets but also ensure the safety of drivers and pedestrians on Marlene,Sigsbee and Route 25.1n view of CV S's redesign of the proposed building and setbacks,in response to critical comments by residents,the signers of this petition are sure that CVS will give the same due consideration to this matter of public safety. Cc:C.Cochran,P.Harris,J.Horton,A.Krupski,R.Oliva,R.Scott,M.Verity D C E AUG 2 3 2004 Southold Town Planning Boar' To: Jeri Woodhouse-Chair-Southold Town Planning Board From:Hannah Masterson—2015 Marlene Lane,Mattituck NY 11952 Re:Proposed CVS Project-Mattituck August 9,2004 Dear Ms Woodhouse: In researching this proposal,I consulted with the staffs of the Planning,Building and Assessors Departments.They were generous with their time and forthcoming with their professional opinions and personal insights.Any misstatements below are entirely mine. The question I posed has two parts: 1.Is all new construction subject to the current zoning rules in respect to setbacks and usage? 2.Are these matters automatically referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals? The proposed CVS project has: I.Non-conforming setbacks: Required Provided Front(Main Street) 100' 75.6' Sigsbee Road 100' 98.1' Marlene Lane 100' 88.1' 2.Non-conforming usage: Lot 4 SW Sigsbee 50' by 140' is zoned R40. Lot 27.1 SE Marlene 203' by 145'—lower part 45'by 145' is zoned R40. If the two R40 lots are rezoned commercial,then there is the option to use both lots entirely for space behind the building instead of for the southernmost portion of the building and the buffer.The then vacant area between the back of the building and the buffer would be wide enough for: 1.Trucks to off-load at the rear of the building; 2.Trash enclosures to be moved from the east side of the building; 3.Fencing to safeguard the back area fitted with gates which could be locked ovemite and marked "Delivery Truck Use Only". These changes in the placement of the offloading dock and the trash enclosures would: 1.Open more parking spaces on the east side; 2.Permit all delivery trucks to be routed south on Marlene to entrance aligned horizontally with Sigsbee; 3.Allow trucks to offload and exit north on Sigsbee and proceed with protection of existing traffic light at Sigsbee and Main Road.This would also eliminate the exit at the top of Marlene,an awkward and possibly dangerous site,particularly for large delivery trucks. Thank you for your consideration of these suggestions. cc:Joshua Horton Southold Town Supervisor;Albert Krupski,Jr.,President,Board of Trvstees,Southo;d Town;Ruth Oliva,Chair,Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals;Robert Scott,Chair,Assessors Office;Michael Verity,Building Department I We,the undersigned residents of Marlene Lane in Mattituck,support the recommendation to change the routing of all delivery and waste disposal vehicles servicing the proposed CVS store as detailed in the sections marked with asterisks in the attached memo to Southold Town Planning Board Chair Jeri Woodhouse,dated August 9,2004: NAME ADDRESS 0 Aj o of PA Z Y`� 3 rhe d --e- /0 200 In - O Ct,lrxw—. 5 fllj N `:01Z (y�Q / h�� p g5 Edward McGlone, VP Marlene Late Civic Association 1515 Marlene Lane PO Box 1041 Mattiluck, NY '11952 (631)298-5850 August 16, 2004 C Councilman, William T, Edwards: DI ' Town of Southold1�� i PO Box 1179 7 r 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 �r wwn v„ Dcar Mr. Edwards: To my knowledge there have been only two public meetings ol'the Town of.Southold Planning Board regarding the ,application from CVS to acquire the bowling alley local cd on Route 25 between the residential streets of Marlene Lane and Sigsbee Road. 1 am writing in my capacity as the elected vice president of the Marlene Lane Civic Association. We the people of the Town of Southold who voted for our tovnt board and pay taxes have, in our opinion, hocn given the shall. 1 do not believe CVS or any related person or entity have paid. taxes to the Town of Southold. However it has been allegedly suggested that there is one individual who has contributed to you and the rest of the board's campaign funds and therefore has put favorable pressure on you and the town board as remuneration. There has never been a project that has flown through the Town of Southold with such speed and exuberance tram our elected officials. As an attendee of these meetings, it appeared that we the concerned citizens were not given any consideration. What was most disconcerting wns that the planning board had alrea,iy prepared a written approval in favor of CVS, The taxpayer's concerns were irrelevant. it was as if they, your appointed planning board, could have cared less if we had an opinion or not. Two of the people on the planning board had side conversations and were laughing whin a citizen spoke. The attorney and related people that represented CVS kept shaking their heard and rolling their eyes when a citizen spoke. When CVS and related spoke the planning board magically listened, showed amazing respect and did appear interested. Further, CVS and related were allowed to just take the floor li-oat the citizens and interject their view whenevur they desired and were not stopped. The citizens were expected a>>d reminded to write t teir names on the piece ol'paper for speakers every time they spoke. CVS ct al were not. f am appalled by the way our residents were treated. That said, lets get down to facts, What was quite interesting was that any question raised to the planning board lead to the same response, they, the town planning board, had no control of the sttuvion. All othcr agencies which would include but are not linttted to, the fire departrrment, DOT, sewer district, storm drainage department,traffic person ctc, gave their approval to the project and the town planning board just followed suite. 1 remember a time when this Town would say NO. The Town of Southold elected officials were not gong to allow Southold to become another Riverhead. Southold was going to stay,jum a simple town, where Gunifies and children were to be considered important. Overdevelopment was going to he controlled by a logical plan. A question was put forth to the planning board regarding the widening and change from one lane of traffic going north and one lane of tratlic going south on Sigsbee and or Marline to two lanes going north and two lanes going south. One of CVS's represcrttatives, ct al jumped up and stated unequivocally no. Review of the Thursday's August 12, 2004, newspaper, The Traveler Watchman, provides and l quote, "The proposal included adding two northbound and two southbound lanes on Silsbee to improve traffic flow, making only one access point on Sigsboe and two on Marlene...,, The planning board agreed with CVS' representa ive. It would appear that the planning hoard did not understand the question or maybe the planning board you appoint did not want to present fact to your constituents, if one is Luing From one lane north and one lane south, into two lanes north and two lanes south it would appear that you are widening the street and changing the character of our neighborhoods. This must be stopped. Further review of the map shows a designation of commercial and residential property for the bowling alley location. Part of the commercial building is on residential property. Further your appointed planning board has given their approval to allow a commercial compactor and u)inmercial garbage to be placed on the residential piece of that property. This is a total disgrace. the Melville Attorney Keith Archer who represents Laker Development, called the project a shining example of how a cooperative effort can bring about positive results. Mr. Arn:her, Attorney also kept reiterating that he will work with the community.... As we all know Mr, Archer will work with the community only when it suites the pocketbooks of those he is representing, Do they elect you and vote for you? 1 don't believe that Mr. Archer or CVS pays taxes in this town. You have allowed, as our representative and a Mattituck resit,lent, to give the impression that they CVS and Laker Development have you and the,ioard in their pockets and this project will bo jammed down our throats no matter what the cost is to the safety of our children or the quality of life to your residents, The Town Board would never allow this to happen in Southold. It appears that you hove determined the Mattituck is going to be a dumping Found. You have supported this by the fact that the shopping center located on the north side of Route 25 which is located dir-utty across from the proposed CVS provides an Eckerd Drugs, Mattituck already offers two options to till prescriptions, one located on Love Lane and the other Eckerd Drugs. Fuither all on line prescriptions for.Eckerd Drugs are now handled by CVS. What doer that tell an intelligent person such as you? Yet you never took the above into consid.enition while determining what is the "best use" of the property and how will it affect the quality of .ife of the community and their children. This pre-approved plan for CVS is the first step to changing the character ol'our community. Tractor trailers and commercial trucks will now be traveling on our residential streets endangering our children who have become accustom to walking to the bench and play ground with a strong level nfsecurity. These changes to our community will riot only - -. µug 1r-Ghl�4 13� 1b • • _ - _. . _ _ - r'.OS;.1P�. affected Marlene Lana, where the entrances and exits of tractor trailers will take plat:but ar part of the proposed plan, traffic will no longer be permitted to exit west from Marlene. Lane on to Route 25. How will these trucks exit our community: Peconic Bay Blvd., Say Ave., Sigsbee Road, Love Lane, Wickham Ave, and Factory Ave. CVS stated that they woAd not nnavel through our residential areas. Which one of these routes is not residential? CVS will impact all homeowners, increasing congestion to (he point of making an already jam-packed intersection more crammed and dangerous. The DOT's approval to have all tractor trailers, delivery trucks, employees and customers enter and leave from the residential streets is a total sham. Per your own maps, the tractor trailers have to swing into oncoming traffic to make the turn to and from Route 25 on to Marlene Lane. Now put children into the mix; cars coming to and from Marlene Lana; cars approaching and leaving from the Waldbaums shopping center directly across from the proposed CVS on Route 25; cars going to and leaving the strip mall located on the ea it side of Marlene Lane; and last but not least this does not even take into consideration cars coming from other parts of Mattituck that will he turning into and leaving Marlene Lyne to have access to the public beach and play ground. You, as our elected official are rnsponsibio for a disaster which is going to happen. There,were approximately 20 people who attended this meeting with objections. At l past 3 people requested a postponement of a decision from the planning board in order to have the; DOT and other' factions at a meeting so we can discuss and plan as a community. This was flatly refused by the board. This must not be allowed to happen. We die citi-rens and taxpayer's must be allowed to have input on any projects that so negatively affect our quality of fife which very much include the protection of our children. Ms. Woodhouse stated that the board doesn't have the authority to judge whether a CVS or any business in needed or desirable. 1 do not believe that for one second. You our town ntficials have the authority to give thought as to the "best use plan" for our community. You have the responsibility not to put our children in danger, That is one of the reasons why we elected you. The bowling alley site's "best use" would be an office building whereby the traffic congestion would be kept at a minimum and there would be no tractor trailers, commercial trucks, commercial garbage, and addition air, noise and light pollution. L¢st but not least there would be no need fbr changes in traffic patterns which affect all of the residence of our community, the Town of Southold, This is not the place for a CVS or tractor trailers and other commercial vehicl�as on our residential streets. The town planning hoard has only tentatively given their approval. This tentative approval; if allowed to become final, will impact the quality of life of all taxpaying residents and we now will become the Town of Riverhead. Our concerns must be addressed and acted upon. Lets get all of the negative allegations concerning why this horrific prgject that grossly impacts we the people of the town rejected and show that you truly represent your constituents, We await your response, Respectfully Edward McGlone, VP ti t c.c. Supeivisor Joshua Y. Horton Councilman Thomas K Wickham Councilman John M, Rumanolli Justice Louis P. Evans. U4, S< �Z- Edward MWilone, VP Marlene Lurie Civic Association 1515 Marlene Lane PO Box 1041 Mattituck, NY '1 1952 (631)298-5850 August 16, 2004 Councilman, William T, Edwards: "Town of Southold PO Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 1 1971 DcaT MT. Edwards' To my knowledge there have been only two public meetings of the Town of Southold Planning Board regarding the application from CVS to acquire the bowling alley locavcd on Route 25 between the residential streets of Marlene Lane and Sigsbee Rood. I am writing in my capacity as the elected vice president of the Marlene Lane Civic Association. We the people of the Town (if Southold who voted for our town board and pay taxcs have, in our opinion, hccn given the shaft, I do not believe CVS or any related person or entity have paid.taxes to the Town of Southold. However it has been allegedly suggested that there is one individual who has contributed to you and the rest of the boat-J's campaign funds and therefore has put favorable pressure on you and the town board as remuneration. There has never been a project that has flown through the Town of Southold with such speed and exuberance from our elected officials_ As an attendee of those meetings, it appeared that we the concerned citizens were not k;iven any consideration. What was most disconcerting was that the planning board had alrea:iy prepared a written approval in favor of CVS. The taxpayer's concerns were irrelevant. it was Lis if they, your appointed planning board, could have cared less if we had an opinion or not. Two of the people on the planning board had side conversations and were laughins wh,n a citizen spoke. The altorncy and related people that represented CVS kept shaking theft heard and rullitag their eyes when a citizen spoke. When CVS and related spoke the planning board magically listened, showed amazing respect and did appear interested, Further, CVS and related were allowed to just take the floor front the citizens and interject their view whenever they desired and were not stopped. The citizens were expected and reminded to write t ieir names on the piece of paper for speakers every time they spoke,. CVS ct al were not. I am appalled by the way our residents were treated. That said, lets get down to facts, What was quite interesting was that any question raised to the planning board lead to the same response, they, the town planning board, had no control of the situation. All other agencies which would include but arc not limited to, the fire department, DOT, sewer district, storm drainage department, traffic person etc, gave their niu'11-GcrvJ4 1- •l:J • • P,214/10 approval to the project and the town planning board just followed suite. 1 remember a time when this Town would say NO, The Town of Southold elected officials were not bong to allow Southold to become another Riverhead. Southold was going to stay just a simple town, where families and children were to be considered important. Overdevelopment was going to he controlled by a logical pian. A question was put forth to the planning board regarding the widening and change from one lute of traffic going north and one lane of tral°tic going south on Sigsbee and or Marlene to two lanes going north and two lanes going south. One of CVS's representatives, et td jumped up and stated unequivocally no. Review of the Thursday's August' 12, 2004, newspaFer, ,rhe Traveler Watchman, provides and L quote, "The proposal included adding two northbound and two southbound lanes on Sigsbee to improve traffic flow, making only one aeces s point on Sigsbee and two on Marlene...,, The planning beard agreed with CVS' represents ive. 1t would appear that the planning hoard did not understand the question or maybe the planning board you appoint did not want to present fact to your constituents, if one is going Itcm one lane north and one lane south, into two lanes north and two lanes south it would appear that you are widening the street and changing the character of our neighborhoods. This must be stopped. Further review of the map shows a designation of commercial and residential property for ttte bowling alley location. Part of the commercial building is on residential property. Further your appointed planning board has given their approval to allow a commercial compactor and commercial garbage to be placed on the residential piece of that property. This is a total disgracC. The Melville Atturney Keith A teller who represents Laker Development, called the project a shining example of how a cu5perative effort can bring about positive results. Mr. Archer, Attorney also kept.reiterating that he will work with the community. ... As we all know Mr. Archer will work with the community only when it suites the pocketbooks of those he is representing, Do they elect you and vote for you? 1 don't believe that Mr. Archer or CVS pays taxes in this town. You have allowed, as our representative and a Mattituck resident, to give the impression that they CVS and Laker Development have you and the mourd in their pockets and this project will be jammed down our threats no matter what the oosl is to the safety of our children or the quality of life to your residents. The Town Board would never allow this to happen in Southold. it appears that you hive determined the Mattituck is going to be a dumping ground. You have supported this by the tact that the shopping center located on the north side of Route 25 which is located dir_ctly across from the proposed CVS provides an Eckerd Drugs, Mattituck already offers two options to till prescriptions, one located on Love Lune and the other Eckerd Drugs. Fuither all on line prescriptions for.Eckerd Drugs are now handled by CVS. What does that tell an intelligent person such as you? Yet you never took the above into consideration while detennining what is the "best use"of the property and how will it affect the quality of .ifc of the community and their children. This pic-approved plan for CVS is the first step to changing the character of our community. Tractor trailers and commercial trucks will now be traveling on our residential streets endangering our children who have become accustom to walking to the hea.ch and play ground with a strong level of security. These changes to our community will riot only affected Marlene Lane, where the entrances and exits of tractor trailers will take plac:but aa: part of the proposed plan, traffic will no longer be permitted to exit west froth Marlene. Lane an to Route 25. How will these trucks exit our community: Peconic Bay Blvd., Bay Ave,; Sigsbeo Road, Love Lane, Wickham Ave, and factory Ave. CVS stated that they woAd not travel through our residential areas. Which one of these routes is not residential? C\'S will impact all homeowners, increasing congestion to the point of making an already join-packed intersection more crammed and dangerous. The DOT's approval to have all tractor trailers, delivery trucks, employees and custmners enter and leave from the residential streets is a total sham, Per your own maps, the tractor trailers have to swing into oncoming traffic to make the turn to and from Route 25 on to Marlene Lanc. Now put children into the mix; cars coming to and from Marlene Lang; cars approaching and leaving from the Waldbaurns shopping center directly across from the proposed CVS on Route 25; cars going to and leaving the strip mall located on the ea.,t side of Marione Lane; and last but not least this does not even take into consideration cars coming from other parts of Mattituck that will he turning into and leaving Marlene Lane to have access to the public beach and play ground, You, as our elected official are responsible for a disaster which is going to happen_ There-were approximately 20 people who attended this meeting with objections. At least 3 people requested a postponement of a decision from the planning board in order to have the DOT and other factions at a meeting so we can discuss and plan as a community. This was flatly refused by the board. This must not be allowed to happen. We the citisens and taxpayer's must be allowed to have input on any projects that so negatively aFfect our quality of lite which very much include the protection of our children, Ms. Woodhouse stated that the board doesn't have the authority to judge whether a CVS or any business in needed or desirable. T do not believe that for one second. You our town otiicials have the authority to give thought as to the "best use plan" for our cammunit:l. You have the responsibility not to put our children in danger. That is one of the reasons why we elocted you. The bowling alley site's "best use" would be an office building whereby the traffic congestion would be kept at a minimum and there would be no tractor trailers, commercial trucks, commercial garbage, and addition air, noise and light pollution. Least but not least there would be no need for changes in traffic patterns which affect all of the residence of our community, the Town of Southold. This is not the place for a CVS or tractor trailers and other commercial vehicles on our residential streets. The town planning board has only tentatively given their approval. This tentative approval, if allowed to become final, will impact the quality of life of all raxF aying residents and we now will become the Town of Riverhead Our concerns must be addressed and acted upon. Lets get all of the negative allegations concerning why this horrific pirjcct that grossly impacts we the people of the town rejected and show that you truly rcpresrnt your constituents, We await your response. Respectfully Edward McGlone. VP c.c. Supervisor Joshua Y. Horton Councilman Thomas K Wickham Councilman John M. Romanelli Justice .Louis P. Evans. To:Jeri Woodhouse-Chair-Southold Town Planning Board 1�� From:Hannah Masterson-2015 Marlene Lane,Mattituck NY 11952 9( wa Re:Proposed CVS Project-Mattituck August 23,2004 Dear Ms Woodhouse: On August 12,2004,1 received a call from Devin DaPos of the CVS presenting team.Bruno Semon had indicated to Devin that,after the August 9,2004 Planning Board meeting,l had serious misgivings about the plan to locate all deliveries and trash at the southeast side of the proposed CVS store.We agreed that: 1.Devin would present the alternative plan to reroute all commercial vehicles to the rear of the store(see sections marked with asterisks on attached memo dated 8/9/04). 2.1 would review Planning Board files and speak to correspondents to see if this proposal to reroute commercial traffic would meet with their approval. There were six letters in the Planning Board file:Two against closing the bowling alley;one to close the cut on Route 25;one from a Sigsbee resident south of boatyard complaining about the boatyard,the proposed CVS size and the present and future traffic;one from owner on southwest border of bowling alley about whether the proposed CVS setback would ensure privacy and quiet;one,from a Peconic Bay Blvd resident,that CVS should have a service entrance in the rear,similar to Waldbaums across the street. Consequently I spoke to: 1.Sigsbee Road residents: -#210 south border of boatyard—the residents are part time and have not been out since the 8/9/04 Planning Board meeting.Their adult daughter was aware of their concerns but could not speak for them. -4225 southwest border of bowling alley—approved of commercial rerouting behind CVS store. 2.Marlene Lane residents; 4300 southeast border of bowling alley—many complaints about the bowling alley;pleased about proposed CVS store with commercial vehicle rerouting as proposed; #255&305 directly opposite on east side of Marlene—many concerns about the increased traffic but happier with proposed rerouting than placement on east side of CVS store. The attached petition was then completed on a door to door basis on Marlene,including Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate in the Celic Center on the northeast comer of Marlene and Route 25.A copy of the CVS site plan was used to illustrate the magnitude of the traffic problem under the proposed plan versus the alternate described in my 8/9/04 memo. Note:A letter to the editor in the 8/19/04 editions of the Suffolk Times and The Traveler Watchman states in detail the views of many who oppose the entire CVS project.It mentions the truck problem as a major concern. The people who signed the petition are not necessarily in favor of the CVS project(some are;some are not),but all agree that they want to not only protect the residential nature of their streets but also ensure the safety of drivers and pedestrians on Marlene,Sigsbee and Route 25.1n view of CVS's redesign of the proposed building and setbacks,in response to critical comments by residents,the signers of this petition are sure that CVS will give the same due consideration to this matter of public safety. Cc:C.Cochran,P.Harris,J.Horton,A.Krupski,R.Oliva,R.Scott,M.Verity _ Southold Town Planr.!r°Soar a • 0 We,the undersigned residents of Marlene Lane in Mattituck,support the recommendation to change the routing of all delivery and waste disposal vehicles servicing the proposed CVS store as detailed in the sections marked with asterisks in the attached memo to Southold Town Planning Board Chair Jeri Woodhouse,dated August 9,2004: NAME ADDRESS i an 7/71K7 u 'X , l t O I V �J Ice,All '�,^ �� /C.L�.)1 ,��J� J /(4�JbC i�u �I, __��iLdLldl-3L✓_Ll i'..�_-� /�L � 0 We,the undersigned residents of Marlene Lane in Mattituck,support the recommendation to change the routing of all delivery and waste disposal vehicles servicing the proposed CVS store as detailed in the sections marked with asterisks in the attached memo to Southold Town Planning Board Chair Jeri Woodhouse,dated August 9,2004: NAME ADDRESS • • 0 • To: Jeri Woodhouse-Chair-Southold Town Planning Board From:Hannah Masterson—2015 Marlene Lane,Mattituck NY 11952 Re:Proposed CVS Project-Mattituck August 9,2004 Dear Ms Woodhouse: In researching this proposal,I consulted with the staffs of the Planning,Building and Assessors Departments.They were generous with their time and forthcoming with their professional opinions and personal insights.Any misstatements below are entirely mine. The question I posed has two parts: Lls all new construction subject to the current zoning rules in respect to setbacks and usage? 2.Are these matters automatically referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals? The proposed CVS project has: I.Non-conforming setbacks: Required Provided Front(Main Street) 100' 75.6' Sigsbee Road 100' 98.1' Marlene Lane 100' 88.1' 2.Non-conforming usage: Lot 4 SW Sigsbee 50' by 140' is zoned R-40. Lot 27.1 SE Marlene 203'by 145'—lower part 45' by 145'is zoned R-40. If the two R-40 lots are rezoned commercial,then there is the option to both lots entirely for space behind the building instead of for the southernmost portion of the building and the buffer.The then vacant area between the back of the building and the buffer would be wide enough for: 1.Trucks to off-load at the rear of the building; 2.Trash enclosures to be moved from the east side of the building; 31encing to safeguard the back area fitted with gates which could be locked ovemite and marked "Delivery Truck Use Only". These changes in the placement of the offloading dock and the trash enclosures would: iz_ I.Open more parking spaces on the east side; 2.Permit all delivery trucks to be routed south on Marlene to entrance aligned horizontally with Sigsbee; 3.Allow trucks to offload and exit north on Sigsbee and proceed with protection of existing traffic light at Sigsbee and Main Road.This would also eliminate the exit at the top of Marlene,an awkward and possibly dangerous site,particularly for large delivery trucks. Thank you for your consideration of these suggestions. cc:Joshua Horton,Southold Town Supervisor;Albert Krupski,Jr,President,Board of Trustees,Southo;d Town;Ruth Oliva,Chair,Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals;Robert Scott,Chair,Assessors Office;Michael Verity,Building Department Ar To: Jeri Woodhouse-Chair-Southold Town Planning Board From:Hannah Masterson—2015 Marlene Lane,Mattituck NY 11952 Re:Proposed CVS Project-Mattituck Southold Tovm Planning Boar August 9,2004 Dear Ms Woodhouse: In researching this proposal,I consulted with the staffs of the Planning,Building and Assessors Departments.They were generous with their time and forthcoming with their professional opinions and personal insights.Any misstatements below are entirely mine. The question I posed has two parts: I.Is all new construction subject to the current zoning rules in respect to setbacks and usage? 2.Are these matters automatically referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals? The proposed CVS project has: I.Non-conforming setbacks: Required Provided Front(Main Street) 100' 75.6' Sigsbee Road 100' 98.1' Marlene Lane 100' 88.1' 2.Non-conforming usage: Lot 4 SW Sigsbee 50'by 140' is zoned R40. Lot 27.1 SE Marlene 203'by 145'—lower part 45' by 145' is zoned R40. If the two R40 lots are rezoned commercial,then there is the option to use both lots entirely for space behind the building instead of for the southernmost portion of the building and the buffer.The then vacant area between the back of the building and the buffer would be wide enough for: 1.Trucks to off-load at the rear of the building; 2.Trash enclosures to be moved from the east side of the building; 3.Fencing to safeguard the back area fitted with gates which could be locked ovemite and marked "Delivery Truck Use Only". These changes in the placement of the offloading dock and the trash enclosures would: l.Open more parking spaces on the east side; 2.Permit all delivery trucks to be routed south on Marlene to entrance aligned horizontally with Sigsbee; 3.Allow trucks to offload and exit north on Sigsbee and proceed with protection of existing traffic fight at Sigsbee and Main Road.This would also eliminate the exit at the top of Marlene,an awkward and possibly dangerous site,particularly for large delivery trucks. Thank you for your consideration of these suggestions. cc:Joshua Horton,Southold Town Supervisor,Albert Krupski,Jr.,President,Board of Trustees,Southo;d Town;Ruth Oliva Chair,Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals;Robert Scott,Chair,Asscssors Office;Michael Verity,Building Department � 210 Sigsbee Road f� Ma�:`ituck, N. Y. 11952 June 23, 2004 Town of Southold Planning Boardct Main Road Southold, New York Reference: Proposed building of CVS store in Mattituck, N.Y. Gentlemen: We own property on Sigsbee Road in Mattituck, Lots #4, #5 and #6, map of Mattituck Park Properties Inc. This land has been in our family for over 60 years . The newspapers have been printing that CVS Pharmacy is planning to build a new store on the Main Road at the top of Sigsbee Road. According to the plans, CVS plans an Exit from the parking lot onto Sigsbee Road across the road from our house. The lot is #101 of Mattituck Park Properties Ind. This lot is a residential lot and should not be used commercially. Not only will it ruin our right to peace and quiet, it will also greatly reduce the value of our property cause constant traffic in front of our home and cause a water run-off problem. Our property has had water run-off problems ever since the Town installed catch basins in front of our property. We have complained to the Town and nothing has been done about it. When we have a rain storm our front lawn floods to within inches of our foundation. We NEVER had water problems until the catch basins came (and that ' s over 50 years) . We went down to town hall twice to have this problem resolved but nothing has been done. We also have large pot holes in front of our house caused by water run-off from the Main Road. The Town of Southold is a beautiful town, why do you want to ruin this with chain industry. Bring in a big ugly building into Mattituck will make it look like another Riverhead. CVS already owns Eckerd Drugs right across the street from the proposed one, why do we need this? There are other towns in the Town of Southold that could use a large drug store, Mattituck does not. We await your favorable reply. Yours ;pTuly, Mar ar Ann Noone � Thomas E. Noone r I,� -------------- ,d iawn M P�� James H. Bergeron t`4 BNOM Drive Now'YWk IM03 (W)473 t Planning Board Southold Town Hall E P.O. Box 1179 (� Southold, NY 11971-0959 D 4 AJune 14, 2004 1 c`10 Soutrold Town Subject: Plans for CVS in Mattituck van „s8o ` Gentlemen, At a recent meeting of the Marlene Association I learned that a CVS Store is being planned to replace the bowling alley that is now on Marlene Lane, Mattituck. It is safe to say that we all are concerned about the commercial traffic the CVS Store will require. We envision tractor trailers and box trucks traveling Peconic Bay Blvd, or looping down Sigsbee Road and up Marlene Lane to make deliveries. This is very likely if you consider how tight the turns are off Rt. 25 onto Marlene Lane, how very difficult it will be for trucks to turn around in the area and how congested Rt 25 is today. Marlene Lane and Sigsbee Road are densely populated with adults and children using these roadways to walk or bike ride to and from the beaches. These roads cannot be used for commercial traffic. Posting signs won't be enough. A CVS Store must have a large service entrance, like what exists behind Waldbaums, providing ample room for several tractor trailer trucks to maneuver without impacting Marlene Lane, Sigsbee Road or Rt. 25. Further, both Rt. 25 and Marlene Lane roadways must be widened providing additional lanes to accommodate th trucks. Sincerely, JUN 2004 aures H. Berger96 sautnoo Boa n Planning Local residence: 10960 Peconic Bay Blvd, Mattituck, NY RC MAY 2 6 2004 Southold Towa Planning Board tIVIS • �Ga?�� z� /�� G✓� � � � C��y �-o � � . �� GSL ��-�- G��`-� /��1�=� _. (/Jo� ,.�-e—��- G�� i�'2c�t��y �f fie. - i�-vc� � C�ou� .�Z�-z�� c�� i ��-�-- �� ABIGAIL A. WICKHAM 05 P.O. Box 718 Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 631-298-8353 Fax 631-298-8565 April 7. 2004 r� 11 Southold Town Planning Board Post Office Box 1179 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed CVS Pharmacy Ladies and Gentlemen: As an outside observer, on behalf of myself and not any client, I ask that you consider the following in relation to the proposed CVS Pharmacy in Mattituck. 1) Given access availability on Sigsbee and Marlene, and given the dangerous traffic issues along this stretch of Route 25, should the Route 25 access be eliminated completely? The proposed entrance on route 25 will be difficult, for cars coming from Factory Avenue across Route 25, and the proposed exit on Route 25 will conflict with the westerly Waldbaum's exit. 2) The comment at a recent meeting about attractiveness of the "McDonalds style" windows is a good one ds the proposed building is unattractive in my opinion. However, please do not overlook the tremendous light pollution resulting from that style of window. Because the windows are so large, the bright light from the inside the McDonald's building streams through to the outside all night long and illuminates the entire area. While exterior lighting must be shielded, the light that comes out of the McDonald's building all night long is much brighter. It's really just another form of advertisement drawing attention to the building. I hope it can be avoided in this project. Very truly yours, A 'gayickham A.AWQb 5"u�3r 1655 Lighthouse Rd. � Southold, N.Y. 11971 12/08/03 Dear Planning Officer, I am writing to you to find out if there is anything that you can recommend that I should do to help keep the CVS Pharmacy from opening up in Mattituck. In Port Jefferson where a CVS has recently come in, it finally knocked out the local pharmacy, Seaport Chemists. Because of our business, I had accounts worth thousands of dollars a month transferred to CVS without my consent. But I dislike CVS, and I had all my accounts eventually transferred to one of the few neighborhood pharmacists left in the area. CVS is a corporate chain that could never begin to replace the small town pharmacy. And, besides your store, there already is a chain pharmacy in Mattituck, Eckerd. How can the town possibly permit two behemoths right across from one another. Moreover, we will lose our bowling alley, the only one in the Town of Southold. Imagine a township without a bowling alley. This is going to have a terrible impact on Southold, especially for seniors and kids. It simply should not be allowed. The idea is terrible in every way. CVS is only offering a duplication of existing services, contributing to traffic and congestion, destroying the area's diversity and part of its rather weak athletic infrastructure, and chipping away at the small town flavor of Mattituck and Southold. Allowing them to come in is a no-win situation. Is there anything I can do? Is it legal to threaten a boycott? This is the biggest issue facing this town in the immediate future. Thank you for considering this letter. Sincerely, -765- 1611 0 % An open letter to whom it may concern, and those at Town Hall. Regarding the possible closing of our towns only bowling ally I would like to say this: We (or at least I) have through the years watched all to often how the over building of stores have caused the demise of the small town feeling of other areas around Long Island (i.e. Patchogue, Rocky Point, Brookhaven, Riverhead, Wading River, the Hamptons, etc.) where long standing Department, Drug, Hardware(or other)stores were forced to close down because similar corporate stores were built around them. Then other corporate stores see their success at hogging all the business and money so they decide to build there too. Then what happens? The first corporate store has to close because no one goes there anymore, and there is not enough population to support both stores, leaving yet another empty building. To me, for the corporations, it is not a matter of providing a service to an area, rather, it is a matter of stealing the customers and their wallets from established stores that already provide the areas needs. Empty buildings and loss of family business be damned all for the glory of corporate greed, number crunching and area dominance. We don't need our area dominated by corporations and we don't need an overstock of same service stores. Who needs a corporate drug/convenience/shopping store when there is already one right across the street (Genovesse/Eckerds) and the village drug store on Love Lane? Should both of these businesses be forced to close along with the bowling alley solely so a CVS can have North Fork dominance? Also, where is the balance of employment? Can CVS cover all those lost jobs? I don't think so. If I remember correctly, Riverheads larger corporate store business went something like this: First, for years and years back there were family owned Sweezey's and Woolworth's in the downtown area, then Grants bulldozed some woods, built and opened and Woolworth's suffered, then Pergaments opened, then Woolworth's closed. Then K-Mart opened and Grants closed and Pergaments suffered. Then Wal-Mart opened and Pergaments closed and K-Mart suffered. Now there is a plethora of brand new shiny stores just opening and Sweezey's has closed, Wal-Mart is hurt and K-Mart is suffering and probably will close too. That will makes three large empty stores because of corporate dominos. This is just the large stores, I can't think of all the smaller Mom and Pop stores that were forced to close along the way. Can you see a pattern here? I hope so, because I do, and of course there is more to it than that, but I hope you get the idea and CVS is just the beginning of it. Just Look where CVS is in the Hamlet of Wading River... In the middle of a farm field, that is soon to be paved over. I say beware the corporate wolves because once they are in Mattituck they will spread to Southold and close the Emporium and the Southold Pharmacy too. After all, isn't there a large senior citizen population there to put in their sights after they have gone after the Mattituck family rearing area. Then perhaps they will open in Greenport on the softball Feld, or at the traffic circle and close down the Arcade and Colonial Drug store and any other store that gets in their way. So then, where would yet one more factor of our small town aura be without even a local neighborhood Pharmacist who knows our ills or a place to meet some friends, socialize and bowl a few frames. And after CVS, what corporation will follow? I know you people in town hall have a lot on your plate trying to save this area, but on your drive home tonight clear your mind and reminisce how things really were just a few short uffolk and think... Is CVS providing something we don't have? I think not. C S ki anything we already have? I think so! And in tl e long run it will be so much RNI more an a i alley. LS 0 1'I IS Daniel Boyle p L5 IS OCT 3 Southold Town Planning Board $UPERV�SOi?S �r� err REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR X IST Ncl t �!l Date: cnsi� :bwn Name: �y�C Gc- ��7/y� e Telephone: Mailing Address: a�`% �� Gu � SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: C c,/ �� n Query: (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) For Office Use Only. Routed to: � . / � 3/ - z9S�" - 51- 3 �3 , 8 �� To ( DAT TIM ,, AM P P FROM PHO O OF �G— N FAX( ) E M E EA M G Q E E-MAILADDRESS q g yy 51 PHONED BACK❑ Rp UIINEbD 5EE YOU❑ AOA NOS❑ IwA<lM Elly 2-6 S 13 e40 y3a esc Utr 4 Page 1 of 2 UEplattenier, Victor From: Caruso, David [DCaruso@VHB.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 9:05 AM To: L'Eplattenier, Victor Subject: CVS Mattituck Neighbor issue Victor, Please see the correspondence below between myself and Bill Jacob of CVS re: response to neighbor issues. I will call you to verify your receipt of this message. Thanks and happy holidays! Dave David M. Caruso, P.E. Project Manager Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 110 Fieldcrest Avenue, 6th Floor Edison, NJ 08837 732-512-0999 (P) 732-512-0384 (F) Bill, A minimum of one grouping of three (3) Colorado Spruce trees in the open area to the north of the southern curb cut. Two groupings (6 Colorado Spruces total) may be required to fill the hole, but I'll defer that decision to Tom/Ed since they have observed the area to be filled in. Thanks and have a happy holiday! Dave David M. Caruso, P.E. Project Manager Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 110 Fieldcrest Avenue, 6th Floor Edison, NJ 08837 732-512-0999 (P) 732-512-0384 (F) -----Original Message----- From: Jacob, Bill R. [mailto:WR]acob@cvs.coml Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:31 AM To: Caruso, David; LaRose, A. Bill Cc: karcher@hba-law.com; Junghans, Michael Subject: RE: CVS Mattituck, NY Dave, Please let me know what type of plantings you recommend and I will get that part going with Jato. I may also extend the fencing because I agree with this neighbor that it would look better higher. I am not opposed to doing both items. Bill 12/28/2005 Page 2 of 2 This communication is confidential and intended only for the recipient(s). Any other use,dissemination,copying,or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify us and destroy it immediately.Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.is not responsible for any undetectable alteration,transmission error,conversion,media degradation,software error,or interference with this transmission. Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.101 Walnut St Watertown,MA 02472 617-924-1770 12/28/2005 yy,� /�`n- --!/✓f fp IZ EXISTIN TREE 12 /` r TTYP. I� �� EXISTING ALK A�0 BENCI vEXISTIN j TO REI �}� A TOW, MEM( r PARE I G k + + 8 VD 12 IS 8 VD 8 VD LOAM & SEED 13 RW ~LOAM & SEED _ —' 4 H'! T E! ; 0VVL ' NC _ 4 1 i : l �i v Y i __--- L ---LO M & SEED I ~ II c 2 It- c ,(� % LOAM & SEED l / EN � r l � 5 a 5 1 r� 41, / E p 3 I i l 'd rn PROPOSED CVS m F BUILDING AREA LOAM & SEED o ,o 14,467 ±SF. r �' L I A. 2 1 12 r At <. I JA 2 PPOC�. 1 1 Drainage and Stormwater Quality Report 1 ID) _ i Proposed Pharmacy VAY Southold Town 1 Planning Boar 1 Village of Mattituck, Town of 1 Southold, Suffolk County, 1 New York 1 1 Prepared for CVS/pharmacy One CVS Drive 1 Woonsocket, RI 1 Prepared by VHM/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. 110 Fieldcrest Ave 1 Raritan Center I Edison, New Jersey 1 t Irer 1 1 January 19, 2004 Co * _ (Revised May 21, 2004) ' M Vanasse Haugen Brusthn,Inc. 1 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary...............................................................................................................1 ' Introduction............................................................................................................................3 ' Existing Conditions...............................................................................................................5 ProposedConditions.............................................................................................................6 ' Stormwater Management Plan............................................................................................7 ' List of Figures Figure 1:Site Location Map ' List of Tables ' Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates Appendices ' Appendix A: Existing and Proposed Drainage Areas 1 1 ' L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc i y Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Executive Summary The proposed project site (the Site) is located at 9870 Main Road (N.Y.S.R.25) ' between Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane. Currently,a bowling alley and bar/restaurant,and a plumbing supply store occupy the Site,along with associated asphalt parking lots. ' Under existing conditions,all stormwater runoff generated from the site is transported via overland flow off the Site and collected in storm drainage inlets ' south of the Site along Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane. The proposed condition replaces the existing bowling alley and plumbing supply ' store and parking lots with a retail pharmacy and parking lot. The pharmacy will occupy the same footprint as the bowling alley,approximately 14,467 square feet. Impervious coverage will be decreased approximately 4,000 square feet from the ' existing to the proposed condition. Approximately 85%of the stormwater runoff from the proposed condition will be collected into drywells and exfiltrated to the natural underlying soil,which has an average percolation rate of 212 in/hr(0.29 ' ft/min) across the site. There are no existing on site infiltration basins for the present site. ' A HydroCAD model,using TR-20 methodology,was developed to evaluate the existing and proposed drainage conditions on the Site. In accordance with the Code ' of the Town of Southold,New York(updated November 30,2003)Appendix A, Chapter A108,Highway Specifications,Article III,Section A108-29,Recharge Basins Type A and Drainage Areas "In areas less than eight(8)acres,other drainage facilities ' such as drywells,etc.,may be installed as approved by the Town Engineer,having been designed for a ten-year storm or two-inch rainfall in twenty-four(24)hours." Table 1 presents a summary of the pre-development and post-development discharge rates ' for the Site for a Type III 24-hr storm with a storm depth of 2 inches. 1 L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 1 ' Ii7.0 V anasse Hangen Brusthn,Inc. Table 1: Peak Discharge Rates (cfs*) ' Design Point ' 2"Rainfall in 24 Hours Existing Condition ' 2.89 cfs Proposed Condition 2.83 cfs expressed in cubic feet per second The results of the analyses indicate that the peak discharge for the 2"rainfall in 24 ' hour event has been decreased from the existing to the proposed condition. In addition, approximately 85% of the stormwater generated on site will be recharged. In the existing condition,a peak discharge of 2.89 cis flowed off site during this type ' of storm,while in the proposed condition only 0.41 cfs flows off site. 1 1 1 ' L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 2 I11L7 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 2 Introduction The proposed project site (the Site)is located at 9870 Main Road (N.Y.S.R.25) ' between Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane. Currently,a bowling alley and bar/restaurant,and a plumbing supply store occupy the Site, along with associated asphalt parking lots.. ' Under the proposed site condition,the Site will be regraded to collect a substantial portion of the Stormwater runoff generated by the proposed development. ' Stormwater runoff from the proposed condition will be collected into drywells and recharged into the underlying soil. There are no existing on site infiltration basins for the present site. The Stormwater Management Plan (the Plan),including Best Management Practices (BMPs) for maintaining stormwater runoff quality both during and after ' construction,was prepared in accordance with the applicable local,state,and federal regulations. Details of the Plan are provided herein. 1 tL:\25095\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 3 » Lags •r r' '�f til g'��'� 9 v matt Al d Site '. , �s a 25 Par .� ' Mart - Figure 1 - Site Location Ld25120\tech\Drainage\DrYalb Drainage Repomdoc 4 ' I11L V anasse Hangen Brusthn,Inc. 3 Existing Conditions Analysis of the existing 77,801 sf(1.786 Acres) drainage area with the HydroCAD ' model,using TR-20 methodology results in a peak discharge rate of 2.89 cubic feet per second (cfs)using the Type III 24-hr rainfall amount of 2 inches conforming to the Code of the Town of Southold,New York. ' Stormwater runoff flows off site to the southwest and southeast in the existing condition,to drain inlets on Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane,respectively. The Site ' contains one soil type,Cut and Fill Land (CuB). The surface runoff potential of this soil types is moderate,and the hazard of erosion is moderate. The results of the HydroCAD model for the existing area is presented on the following pages. 1 1 1 1 1 ' L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 5 ' Existing Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 1 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/18/2004 ' Subcatchment 1S: Area E1 ' Runoff = 1.23 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.076 af, Depth= 1.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" 1 Area (ac) CN Description 0.430 98 Paved parking & roofs 0.310 85 Gravel roads, HSG B 0.740 93 Weighted Average ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.7 225 0.0470 1.4 Lag/CN Method, Area 1 ' Subcatchment 1S: Area E1 Hydrograph 1.23 Lis, 1 LL 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 16 17 18 19 20 ' Time (hours) ' Existing Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/18/2004 Subcatchment 2S: Area E2 Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.041 af, Depth= 1.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.330 98 Paved parking & roofs ' 0.090 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B 0.420 92 Weighted Average ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 4.2 242 0.0250 1.0 Lag/CN Method, Area 2 ' Subcatchment 2S: Area E2 Hydrograph 0.7 0.65osa c s 1 Os 0.55 0.5 ' 0.45- Z' .45 a 0.4 ' 3 0.35-. - . . . - -.. -.. _o u. 0.3 0.25- 0.2- 0,15' .250.2 0.15 0.1 . ' 0.05t' 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ' Time (hours) ' Existing Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3 HydroCAD@ 6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/18/2004 ' Subcatchment 3S: Area E3 ' Runoff = 1.03 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.065 af, Depth= 1.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00rr ' Area (ac) CN Description 0.550 98 Paved parking & roofs ' 0.080 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 0.630 93 Weighted Average ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.5 205 0.0250 1.0 Lag/CN Method, Area 3 Subcatchment 3S: Area E3 Hydrograph toaaro: LL 1 t 0r 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ' Time (hours) 1 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 4 1 Proposed Conditions ' Analysis of the existing 77,801 sf(1.786 Acres) drainage area with the HydroCAD model,using TR-20 methodology results in a peak discharge rate of 2.89 cubic feet ' per second(cfs)using the Type III 24-hr rainfall amount of 2 inches conforming to the Code of the Town of Southold,New York. ' Under the proposed site condition,a substantial portion of the stormwater runoff generated by the proposed development will be collected into drywells and recharged into the underlying soil. The amount of stormwater flowing off site will ' be substantially reduced compared to the existing condition. As stated previously,85%of the stormwater generated on site will be recharged and ' exfiltrated to the natural underlying soil,which has an average percolation rate of 212 in/hr(0.29 ft/min) across the site. In the existing condition,a peak discharge of 2.89 cfs flowed off site during this type of storm,while in the proposed condition ' only 0.41 cfs flows off site. The results of the HydroCAD model for the existing area is presented on the following pages. ' L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 6 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 1 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 @ 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Subcatchment 1S: Area 1 - Western Parking Lot & Roof ' Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Depth= 1.77' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.420 98 Paved parking & roofs ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) ' 1.9 170 0.0360 1.5 Lag/CN Method, Area 1 Subcatchment 1S: Area 1 - Western Parking Lot & Roof ' Hydrograph 0.95 0.9 0.65 , 0.8- 0.75 -- 0.7 t 0.65 ,0.6 0.55 --0.5 0.45 cm LLOA 0.35 __ _0.3 0.25 0.2 _0.15 0.1 _._ - _-_-- 0.05 ' 0 www 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 6 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 Pond 1 P: DW-1 ' Inflow Area = 0.420 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.77" Inflow 0.87 cfs @ 12.03 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Outflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Atten=31%, Lag=4.3 min ' Discarded = 0.60 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs ' Peak Elev= 11.38' Surf.Area= 59 sf Storage= 198 cf Plug-Flow detention time=2.3 min calculated for 0.062 of (100% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 7.35 0 0 0 0 8.35 59 20 20 61 9.35 59 59 79 88 10.35 59 59 138 115 ' 11.35 59 59 197 142 12.35 59 59 256 169: 13.35 59 59 315 197 ' 14.35 59 59 374 224' 15.35 59 59 433 251 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.59 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=11.36' (Free Discharge) ' t1=Exfiltration (Controls 0.59 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices ' 1 Discarded 0.00' 0.250000 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area 1 Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by tenter your company name here} Page 7 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 Pond 1 P: DW-1 Hydrograph M Inflow 0.95 oaz eis _ ®Discarded 0.9 - - 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 _- 0.65 O. 0.6 w 0.55 0.5 00.45 - -� u. 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 .. 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 ................ MW ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 . 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ' Pond 1 P: DW-1 Stage-Discharge 15- 14- 13-. 5 1413 o `w 11 v 9 0 1 Discharge (ds) 1 1 Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type ///24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 C 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 Pond 1 P: DW-1 Stage-Area-Storage SurfaceMetted Area(sq-ft) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 ®Surface ■Wettetl - _ - - If Storage 14- 12- 0 4 12 10 ' 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Storage(cubic-1 et) - 1 1 1 Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Subcatchment 2S: Area 3 - North Parking Lot & Front Roof Section ' Runoff = 0.83 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Depth= 1.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.410 98 Paved parking & roofs ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) ' 3.6 225 0.0160 1.0 Lag/CN Method, Area 2 Subcatchment 2S: Area 3 - North Parking Lot & Front Roof Section ' Hydrograph 0.8 0.75 , 0.7 c.. ' 0.65 0.6 0.55 ' 0.5 c 0.45 u. 0.4 0.35 0.3 o.z5 0.2 ' 0.15 0.1 0.05 " c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 1 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 9 HydroCAD@ 6.10 s/n 001236 C 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 2P: DW-3 Inflow Area = 0.410 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.77" Inflow 0.83 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Outflow — 0.57 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Atten= 32%, Lag=4.5 min Discarded = 0.57 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs ' Peak Elev= 16.05' Surf.Area= 59 sf Storage= 185 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 2.3 min calculated for 0.060 of (100% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections ' Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 12.25 0 0 0 0 13.25 59 20 20 61 14.25 59 59 79 88 15.25 59 59 138 115 ' 16.25 59 59 197 142 17.25 59 59 256 169 ' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.56 cfs @ 12.13 hrs HW=16.00' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Controls 0.56 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices ' 1 Discarded 0.00' 0.250000 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 10 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 2P: DW-3 Hydrograph - .. _ _. .. ®Inflow 0.9 0 10 Discartled 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 ' 0.65 0.6 0.55 . u 0.5 ' 0 0.45 a 0.4 0.35 0.3 _ 0.25 .. 0.2 0.1 0.05 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ' Time (hours) Pond 2P: DW-3 Stage-Discharge C16- 15- 14- 13- 6 51413 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0 35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 Discharge (cfs) 1 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11 HydroCAD®6.10 S/n 001236 ©1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 2P: DW-3 Stage-Area-Storage ' Surface/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 11Surface ■Wetted . .. _- .. _. __. ®Storage 17- 16- 15 716 15 0 v 14- 13- 0 30 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 ' Storage(cubic-feet) ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by f enter your company name here} Page 3 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Subcatchment 4S: Area 4 - Eastern Parking Lot & Roof ' Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Depth= 1.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.300 98 Paved parking & roofs ' Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.8 200 0.0220 1.2 Lag/CN Method, Area P4 Subcatchment 4S: Area 4 - Eastern Parking Lot & Roof ' Hydrograph 0.65 0.55 10.5 0.45' _. . 0.4 ' 1 u 0.35 0 'u. 0.3 ' 0.25- 0.2-" .25 0.2 0.05 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 12 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 4P: DW-4 ' Inflow Area = 0.300 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.77" Inflow 0.62 cis @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 0.044 of Outflow = 0.43 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.044 af, Atten=30%, Lag=4.1 min Discarded = 0.43 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.044 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs ' Peak Elev= 15.46' Surf.Area=59 sf Storage= 114 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 1.9 min calculated for 0.044 of (100% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) ' 12.85 0 0 0 0 13.85 59 20 20 61 14.85 59 59 79 88 15.85 59 59 138 115 ' 16.85 59 59 197 142 Discarded-OutFlow Max=0.43 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=15.41' (Free Discharge) ' t--1=Exfiltration (Controls 0.43 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices ' 1 Discarded 0.00' 0.250000 fpm Exfiltration over entire Wetted area Pond 4P: DW-4 ' Hydro graph - - -- ■Inflow ■Discarded ' 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.45 ' m 0,4- 0 .4 0 LL 0.3- 0. .3 - 0.15 0.1 _. _. 0.05 1 0 . . - . . Wr 1 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 13 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 4P: DW-4 Stage-Discharge ' ',... ', ■Discarded 16- 2 6 0 Ri 14- 13t 4 13 ' 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 Discharge (cfs) Pond 4P: DW-4 ' Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Wetted Area(sq-ft) 0 20 40 60 60 100 120 140 ®Sudace ' ■Wetted ®Storage 16- 15- 14- 1310 6 151413 0 20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 180 Storage(Cubic-feet) 1 1 Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4 HydroCAD®6.10 s/n 001236 0 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 Subcatchment 5S: Area 4A - Loading, Dumpster, &Trash Compactor Areas ' Runoff = 0.10 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 1.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.050 98 Paved parking & roofs Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) ' 3.3 150 0.0100 0.8 Lag/CN Method, Area NA Subcatchment 5S: Area 4A - Loading, Dumpster, & Trash Compactor Areas ' Hydrograph 0.11 0.105 _ _ 040Ehl. 10.1 _ 0,095 0.09 0.085 0.08 0.075 0.07 ,30.065 _. ' 0.06 _. 00.055 EL 0.05 0.045 I.. :... - ' 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.02$ ..... . ,... _. _.... 0.02 - - 0.015 0.005 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 73 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 111 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 14 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Pond 5P: DW-4A Inflow Area = 0.050 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.77" Inflow 0.10 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Outflow - 0.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 6%, Lag= 1.3 min Discarded = 0.10 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 16.04' Surf.Area=23 sf Storage= 8 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 1.3 min calculated for 0.007 of (100% of inflow) Storage and wetted areas determined by Conic sections ' Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) (sq-ft) 15.65 0 0 0 0 ' 16.65 59 20 20 61 17.85 59 71 90 93 ' Discarded OutFlow Max=0.09 cfs @ 12.07 hrs HW=16.03' (Free Discharge) t1=Exfiltration (Controls 0.09 cfs) # Routing Invert Outlet Devices 1 Discarded 0.00' 0.250000 fpm Wiltration over entire Surface area ' Pond 5P: DW-4A Hydrograph Fa infiow 0.11 --v7n�s ®Discardetl 0.105 0.1 ' 0.095 0.09 0.065 0.08 0.075 1 o.m 0.065 0.06 3 0.055 - - ' LL 0.05 0.045 0.04 0.035 --. -- --_ - 0.03 - 0.025 0.02 - -- - - 0.015 -- 0.01 -.. 0.005 Pr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hours) 1 Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Page 15 HydroCADO 610 s/n 001236 © 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 Pond 5P: DW-4A Stage-Discharge ' ',. ■Discarded 17- d c o w 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 02 0.22 0.24 ' Discharge (cfs) Pond 5P: DW-4A ' Stage-Area-Storage Surface/Wetted Area(sq-tt) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 ®Sudeoe ®Wettetl ®Storage m 17- 16- 0 7 160 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Storage(cubic-feet) 1 ' Proposed Conditions 2-yr storm Type 11124-hr Rainfall=2.00" Prepared by (enter your company name here} Page 5 HydroCADO 6.10 s/n 001236 0 1986-2002 Applied Microcomputer Systems 5/20/2004 ' Subcatchment 6S: Area Offsite ' Runoff = 0.41 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 0.56" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-24.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Rainfall=2.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.600 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D ' 0.010 98 Paved parking & roofs 0.610 80 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.0 Direct Entry, Area Offsite 1 ' Subcatchment 6S: Area Offsite Hydrograph ' 0.4s 0.44 0.42 _._ 0,41 cro' 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 __ r 0.32 .. 0.3 .. 0.28 in 0.26 =- 0.24 c 0.22 _. .. LL 0.2 0.18 0.16 ' 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.04 0.02 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ' Time (hours) 1 1 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. 5 Stormwater Management Plan The purpose of the Stormwater Management Plan is to provide a comprehensive ' framework for the long-term protection of natural resources in and around the Site from degradation as a result of stormwater discharges. This is achieved through the use of a variety of water quality and quantity control measures designed to decrease ' the amount of pollutants discharged from the Site,increase the quality of stormwater recharged on the Site, and control discharge rates. ' The following sections describe the regulations pertinent to stormwater management and the specific components of the Stormwater Management Plan to be implemented at the Site. ........................................................................................................................................................................................... Erosion and Sedimentation Control Techniques The following erosion and sedimentation controls will be employed to minimize erosion and transport of sediment to resource areas during the earthwork and ' construction phases of the project. Silt Fencing ' Silt fencing will be installed around the perimeter of the site to trap sediment transported by runoff before it reaches the drainage system or leaves the construction ' site.This semi-permeable barrier,made of a synthetic porous fabric,will be embedded 4-inches into the existing ground to minimize undercutting by runoff.The silt fence will be replaced as determined by periodic field inspections. Catch Basin Protection Newly constructed and existing catch basins will be protected with silt sacks throughout construction. ' Gravel and Construction Entrance/Exit ' A typical, temporary crushed-stone construction entrance/exit will be constructed.A cross slope will be placed in the entrance to direct runoff to a protected catch basin inlet or settling area.If deemed necessary after construction begins,a wash pad may ' be included to wash off vehicle wheels before leaving the project site. L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAYD4.doc 7 ' ILU Vanasse Hangen Brm in,Inc. ' Maintenance ' > The contractor or subcontractor will be responsible for implementing each control shown on the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan.In accordance with EPA regulations,the contractor must sign a copy of a certification to verify ' that a plan has been prepared and that permit regulations are understood. > The on-site contractor will inspect all sediment and erosion control structures ' periodically and after each rainfall event.Records of the inspections will be prepared and maintained on-site by the contractor. ' > Silt shall be removed from behind barriers if greater than 6-inches deep or as needed. ' > Damaged or deteriorated items will be repaired immediately after identification. ' > The underside of hay bales should be kept in close contact with the earth and reset as necessary. ' > Sediment that is collected in structures shall be disposed of properly and covered if stored on-site. ' > Erosion control structures shall remain in place until all disturbed earth has been securely stabilized.After removal of structures,disturbed areas shall be regraded and stabilized as necessary. ' The soil erosion and sediment control plan is included in the project plan set. 1 ' L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mettituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 8 ' IIID Vanasse Hangen Brusthn,Inc. 1 ' Appendix A: Existing and Proposed Drainage Areas L:\25085\tech\Drainage\Mattituck Drainage Report 21MAY04.doc 9 i i fi G POP �_. q i i 1 9 �� a. lis A• ,jm -v eta Y I •: r JI TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED CM/S PHARMACY Main Road (NYS Route 2S) Mattituck, New York Prepared for. Morton Weber & Associates Prepered by: DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES APRIL 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Purpose of Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Location . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 STUDY APPROACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Roadway Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Signalized Intersection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Unsignalized Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Grades and Sight Distances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ' Accident Records . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ' SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Site-Generated Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Existing Electrical Heating/Office Building and Bowling Alley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ' TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Planned Roadway Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Other Planned Developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Signalized Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Unsignalized Intersections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 ROADWAY MODIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 ACCESS EXAMINATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 PARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Riverhead-20067.00 File:TIS.wpd -I- 1 T ABLE Off'"CONTENTS ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Alternative Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Public Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49 Seasonal Traffic Variations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 ICONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Intersection Capacity Analyses Summaries Capacity Analyses Results Traffic Volume Counts Accident Records Public Transportation 1 1 pECE YE I ppR 1 2 2004 D Southold Town Planning Boar, 1 I WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd -11- 1 INTRODUCTION i i WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:nS.wpd 1 ' Purpose of Report ' This Traffic Impact Study contains the results of a traffic engineering examination of the proposed development of a 14,467 square foot CVS Pharmacy. The proposed pharmacy is located in Mattituck, ' Town of Southold,Suffolk County,New York. This report appraises the traffic aspects of the proposed development with particular emphasis on its impact on the surrounding street and highway network. Location ' The proposed CVS Pharmacy will be located on the south side of Main Road(NYS Route 25)between Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road,and Marlene Lane in Mattituck, Town of Southold, New York. 1 Figure 1,Area Map,indicates the location of the Town of Southold in the New York Metropolitan area. The location of the site is shown in Figure 2, Location Map, while Figure 3, Site Map, presents the boundaries of the property and the adjacent roadway network. ' At present, the site of the proposed CVS Pharmacy is occupied by a 3,762 square foot, two-story electrical heatingloffice building and an operating 16-lane bowling alley, both of which will be demolished. The site is zoned Business B for business use. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 2 Ci a: w a ^ ' a U CLryEd O� W Q 6 Q ~ z CD w w L a z w� Qa M 'I 0 $ fl ° z O N ' ° �--� rn Z C)CqZ c,,ej U � o g CI) CL a Q jl 11 o cv < 0 0 to Lu CD •• • —._..-- .. 01 •.. C C> am --- O F- W � LLJ fN `' o i U mM �Z �~ OJ W o° • Q "a Z iq LOCUST AVE Le Ile t; ♦ '1 _+'. W ✓� v PAPi. .,,kMarsRAr KA3. : IXa##' CAMP MINEOLA,;:O�`�� ✓✓/ �dX co Nt • � � �, r � ^ t � Izl a � \\ i O � • + i ♦• p o'er $ ; , Q1j. • d ° o Q b • • •CO A st , Ce _ V a � ♦ r µ' f Water SITE -` 25Park Mar�i�na� eek FIGURE 3 SITE MAP s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 STUDY APPROACH 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd (7 ' As part of the preparation of this Traffic Impact Study, the following tasks were undertaken: ' 1. Several personal, on-site field observations were made to observe the traffic movements under various conditions. ' 2. A physical inventory was made of the adjacent street network. ' 3. An analysis was made of the traffic volume data obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. ' 4. Supplementary manual traffic counts were collected as necessaryto update the available volume counts. 1 5. An examination was made of the traffic flow on Main Road (NYS Route 25), Factory Avenue, ' Sigsbee Road, and Marlene Lane in the vicinity of the site. ' 6. An evaluation was made of the safety factors by reviewing recent accident records obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. ' 7. A trip generation analysis was performed to determine the additional traffic attributable to the proposed CVS Pharmacy development. 8. A directional distribution analysis was performed to distribute the site-generated traffic onto the surrounding street network. ' 9. A trip assignment analysis was performed to examine the composite traffic volumes that would result due to the addition of the site-generated traffic to the existing traffic volumes in order to determine the traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. r10. Capacity analyses were performed at key signalized and unsignalized intersections in order to examine their ability to accommodate the additional traffic generated by the proposed CVS Pharmacy. ' 11. A review of the access arrangements was made. ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 7 12. An evaluation was made of the adequacy of the proposed parking to meet the demands of the proposed use. ' 13. Conclusions were made of the traffic impact of the development as a result of the data and facts gathered in this study. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING ' ROADWAY NETWORK i 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattimck-23140.00 File:TIS.Wpd 9 i ' Roadway Characteristics ' As shown in Figure 3, Site Map, the site is located on the south side of Main Road (NYS Route 25) between Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane in Mattituck,New York. ' Main Road (NYS Route 25) is a major east/west New York State highway facility that provides direct access to the site. In the vicinity of the proposed development,Main Road consists of two lanes(one in ' each direction)along with a center left tum lane and additional turning lanes at major intersections. The posted speed limit on Main Road in the vicinity of the site is 35 miles per hour. ' Factory Avenue is a north/south roadway that is located west of the site. Factory Avenue terminates at its intersection with Main Road and continues to the north. In the vicinity of the site, Factory Avenue consists of two lanes(one northbound and one southbound). The posted speed limit on Factory Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 35 miles per hour. The intersection of Factory Avenue with Main Road is offset 50 feet to the east of the intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee Road. Sigsbee Road is a north/south roadway that is located west of the site. Sigsbee Road terminates at its intersection with Main Road and continues to the south. In the vicinity of the site,Sigsbee Road consists of two lanes (one in each direction). The posted speed limit on Sigsbee Road in the vicinity of the site ' is 30 miles per hour. ' Marlene Lane is a north/south roadway located east of the site that provides direct access to the site. In the vicinity of the site, Marlene Lane consists of two lanes (one northbound and one southbound). Marlene Lane terminates at its intersection with Main Road and continues to the south. The posted speed ' limit on Marlene Lane is 30 miles per hour. ' Signalized Intersection In the vicinity of the site, the following signalized intersection was investigated: • Main Road(NYS Route 25) at Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road(west of the site) The lane configurations at the signalized intersection approaches of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road consist of the following: WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 10 I. Eastbound Main Road Approach: A separate left turn lane and a combined thru/right turn lane. ' 2. Westbound Main Road Approach: A separate left tum lane and a combined thru/right ' turn lane. 3. Northbound Sigsbee Road Approach: A combined left turn/thru/right turn lane. 4. Southbound Factory Avenue Approach: A combined left turn/thru/right tum lane. It should be noted that the intersection of Sigsbee Road with Main Road is offset 50 feet to the west of the intersection of Main Road at Factory Avenue. Unsignalized Intersections In the vicinity of the site, the following unsignalized intersections were investigated: ' • Main Road(NYS Route 25) at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access • Main Road(NYS Route 25) at Site Access Drive ' The lane configurations at the unsignalized intersection approaches of Main Road (NYS Route 25) at ' Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access consist of the following: 1. Eastbound Main Road Approach: A combined thru/right tum lane. (Note: There is a ' left turn restriction posted for traffic entering via this driveway). 2. Westbound Main Road Approach: A separate left turn lane and a combined thru/right ' tum lane. 3. Northbound Marlene Lane Approach: A combined left turn/thru/right turn lane. ' 4. Southbound Mattituck Plaza Shopping A single lane. (Note:There is a left tum restriction ' Center Access Approach: posted for traffic exiting via this driveway). WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 11 It should be noted,however,that when the capacity analyses were performed for this intersection,the lane configuration for the eastbound approach on Main Road was entered as a separate left tum lane and a combined thru/right turn lane as many vehicles were observed using the striped median to make an illegal left turn into the Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access Drive. This lane configuration was used to better represent actual operational conditions at this location. ' The lane configurations at the unsignalized T-intersection approaches of Main Road(NYS Route 25)at ' the Site Access Drive consist of the following: 1. Eastbound Main Road Approach: A combined thru/right turn lane. 2. Westbound Main Road Approach: A separate left turn lane and a thru lane. ' 3. Northbound Site Access Drive Approach: A single lane. Grades and Sight Distances ' In the vicinity of the site access driveways,Main Road, Sigsbee Road,and Marlene Lane are essentially flat and there are no horizontal curves. As a result,no sight distance restrictions occur in the vicinity of the access drives on Main Road, Sigsbee Road, and Marlene Lane. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING 1 TRAFFIC FLOW 1 CONDITIONS 1 1 1 1 WFB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattiwck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 13 1 1 1 ' Traffic Volumes Available traffic flow information was obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation and the files of Dunn Engineering Associates. The available information consisted of machine traffic volume counts on Main Road(NYS Route 25). The estimated Average Annual Daily Traffic on Main ' Road(NYS Route 25)from Manor Lane to Sound Avenue,provided by the New York State Department of Transportation, was 15,532 vehicles per day in 2001. To supplement the available traffic machine count data and to obtain specific turning count information ' of the existing traffic during the peak hours of the proposed development, manual intersection turning movement counts for morning and evening peak hours were collected on a weekday. Also,traffic turning movement counts were collected on a Saturday afternoon. These counts were performed in December t 2003. An examination of the traffic volume information reveals that the peak weekday morning and evening traffic volumes occur between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., respectively. The peak existing weekend traffic volumes occur on Saturdays from 11:00 A.M. to 2:00 ' P.M. ' The available traffic volume information is contained in the section of the Appendix entitled"Traffic Volume Counts". ' Accident Records ' Verbal descriptions were requested from the New York State Department of Transportation concerning all the reportable and non-reportable accident cases that have occurred on NYS Route 25, from Sigsbee ' Road on the west to Marlene Lane on the east(endpoints inclusive), for the three latest years for which records are available. This data made it possible to identify existing accident hazards and to evaluate the effect the proposed development would have on the rate of accidents in the area. ' After receiving the accident data, an accident statistic summary table and a collision diagram were ' prepared for the three most recent years for which accident data was available. The accident statistic summarytable and collision diagram showing all ofthe reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring ' on this section of NYS Route 25 during the September 1998 through August 2001 period is presented in Figure 4, Accident Diagram. The accident statistic summary table presented in Figure 4 contains a listing of accidents by accident type for NYS Route 25. ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:7iS."d 14 . . . . . . . _ 3 N:c _� Q 0� §= % tQ �qq§ ± w � f� �% § z u - / � � kf -5 � <U) \ z k } gZFo e_ - Wa U zzzw / 0 ' k` $ § /R /a 2i K m - ƒ \ � # � ■ � m § ( � E U) z E ■ } hk - , 7 , % | \ im |§ | § § ! ! \ | & z 0 - §- I§ a � $ // I 4 09 ¥.�, ` k /\ ON � � � k ] §\ ® §E # � U) $ k2kq > # # aa � ' The accident diagram contained in Figure 4 presents both the reportable and non-reportable accidents that have occurred at the intersections and highway sections between mile markers 25-0704-1527 and 25- 0704-1528-29 from September 1998 through August 2001. It should be noted that without the availability of the source documents needed in order to complete a more detailed accident analysis (accident source documents from the New York State Department of Transportation are unavailable to private parties due to confidentiality concerns),only a general evaluation of accidents in the area can be made. This general evaluation and analysis was completed only to provide the New York State Department of Transportation with information to assist its review of our application. It should also be noted that the summary of the accident diagram shown in Figure 4 is influenced by the recording ofthe accident by police personnel. Often accidents are recorded incorrectly,particularly when many driveways and signals are in close proximity. The following two intersections were further examined to determine if there were patterns in accident type,pavement conditions, lighting conditions, etc.: • NYS Route 25 at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue • NYS Route 25 at Marlene Lane Possible actions to be taken to alleviate the problems were also examined for each intersection. The following section describes the findings of this detailed accident investigation. The summary table on Figure 4 indicates a total of 21 accidents on NYS Route 25 between Sigsbee 1 Road/Factory Avenue and Marlene Lane(endpoints inclusive). Wet pavement accidents did not occur at an inordinately high rate at only 5% of the total (wet, ice and snow combined). The largest concentration of accidents in the study area occurred at the Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue intersection. This would be expected as this is a high volume intersection with four approach legs. Fifteen of the total of twenty-one accidents were reported to have occurred here. Intersection Location-NYS Route 25 at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue The majority of accidents which occurred at this intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were rear-end accidents. Specifically, 6 of the 15, or 40% of the total reportable and non- reportable accidents occurring at the intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were rear-end accidents. Overall, 9 of the 15, or 60% of all reportable and non-reportable accidents ' occurring at this intersection from September 1998 to August 2001 represented injury accidents. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 16 Rear end accidents are typically indicative of the frequent starts and stops that occur within the traffic stream at a signalized intersection. It should be noted that the traffic signal was installed at the intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee ' Road/Factory Avenue in 2000. Intersection Location-NYS Route 25 at Marlene Lane Accidents at this unsignalized intersection during the September 1998 to August 2001 time period were dominated by right-angle accidents. Specifically,3 of the 4,or 75%ofthe total number of reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring at the Marlene Lane intersection were right-angle accidents. Two of the three right-angle accidents at this location involved a southbound left turning vehicle and another eastbound thru vehicle. The third right-angle accident involved a northbound thru vehicle and another westbound thru vehicle. The occurrence of the first two right-angle accidents at the unsignalized Marlene ILane intersection can be attributed to the failure of the drivers to observe the left turn restriction posted for traffic exiting via this Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center driveway. Overall,2 of the 4,or 50%of all reportable and non-reportable accidents occurring at this intersection from September 1998 to August 2001 represented injury accidents. A WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 17 t EXISTING EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 18 ' The availability of police protection and fire protection services in the vicinity of the proposed site is excellent. The area of the site is patrolled by the Southold Town Police Department. The Southold Town Police Department is located near the intersection of Route 25 at Peconic Lane in Peconic approximately 6 '/2 miles east of the proposed development. At present,numerous police patrols pass by the site. The firehouse of the Mattituck Fire Department is located on the west side of Wickham Avenue and north of Route 25 near Pike Street, approximately 3/4 of a mile east of the proposed development. Due to the close proximity of the firehouse and the presence of police patrols, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the site of the proposed development. r WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File: nS.wpd 19 SITE TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:'HS.wpd 20 Site-Generated Traffic As part of this examination,trip generation estimates were prepared for the proposed 14,467 square foot CVS Pharmacy. Information on trip generation rates for pharmacies is contained in the latest(7`")edition of Trip Generations, a report published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This is a nationally recognized authoritative source of trip generation information for various land uses. In order to predict the amount of traffic generated by the proposed pharmacy, trip generation estimates were calculated under ITE Land Use Code 880-Pharmacies/Drugstore Without Drive-Through Window Operation. However,it should be recognized that not all ofthe traffic generated by the pharmacy is new traffic added to the adjacent street system. Land uses such as retail establishments,certain restaurants,banks,service stations, and convenience markets attract patrons from the passing stream of traffic. ' The ITE indicates that,when this phenomenon occurs,trips can be broken down into the following three categories: Primary Trips 1 Diverted Linked Trips Pass-by Trips A primary trip destined to a pharmacy is one in which the purpose of the trip is to go solely to and from the pharmacy. The trip pattern is generally home-to-pharmacy and then pharmacy-to-home. A diverted linked trip or a pass-by trip is one in which the pharmacy destination is a secondary part of the primary trip,such as work-to-pharmacy-to-home. The diverted linked trip involves a route diversion from one roadway to another, for example, to reach a pharmacy. The pass-by-trip comes directly from the traffic stream passing the facility on the adjacent street system and does not require a diversion from another roadway. It is essential that this phenomenon be recognized when examining the traffic impact of a development on the street system. ' "Trip Generation", Seventh Edition,Institute of Transportation Engineers,Washington DC,2003. WBB\CVS Pham cy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 21 Information presented in the ITE Trip Generation report indicates that up to 65% of traffic patronizing pharmacies is already on the roadway network for another purpose. For the purpose of this report,a pass- by credit of 50% has been used. hi this manner, a conservative estimate of the traffic generated by the proposed development is presented. Table 1 presents a breakdown of the anticipated traffic entering and exiting the proposed development for the weekday A.M. peak hour,weekday P.M.peak hour, and the Saturday peak hour. The table also 1 specifies the estimated pass-by trips and the net new traffic on the adjacent street network. tlr 1� :i�� Nt�µ�, :TY'.� Y'4i 7e}�.TJ 4 F :Bv ♦4 .i 6� n.I .1�1k�ta Pharmacy (14,467 S.F.) 42 29 61 61 76 79 (ITE Code 880) Less Pass-By Trips 21 14 30 30 38 39 (50%) ' Net New Traffic on Adjacent 21 15 31 31 38 40 Roadways Table 1 Site-Generated Traffic Proposed CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck It can be seen by examining Table 1 that the highest site-generated traffic can be expected to occur on a Saturday during the midday peak hour when an estimated 78 vehicle trips per hour will be generated by the proposed CVS Pharmacy (38 in and 40 out). During the weekday P.M. peak hour, the site- generated volumes are anticipated to be 62 vehicles per hour(31 in and 31 out). During the weekday A.M.peak hour,trip generation at the site will be lower when the site-generated traffic is expected to be 36 vehicles per hour(21 in and 15 out). WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 22 Existing Electrical Heating/Office Building and Bowling Alley ' As noted previously, the site of the proposed CVS Pharmacy is occupied by an electrical heating/office building and an operating 16-lane bowling alley, both of which will be demolished. For comparative purposes,the traffic volume generated byboth the 3,762 square foot(two-story)electrical heating/office building and the 16-lane bowling alley were they to remain was estimated using ITE trip generation data. The trip generation is summarized in Table 2, Trip Generation, Existing Electrical Heating/Office Building and 16-Lane Bowling Alley. The trip generation of the proposed CVS Pharmacy use is included in Table 2 for comparison purposes. In this study, a trip credit for the existing electrical heating/office building traffic at the site was not applied,neither was a trip credit for the existing 16-lane bowling alley at the site applied. Thus, a conservative worst case scenario is presented in this Traffic Impact Study. kour i13, I aiw Exit Existing Electrical Heating/ ' Office Building 3,762 S.F., Two-Story 6 1 1 6 0 1 (7,524 S.F. Total) ' (Land Use Code 110) Existing Bowling Alley 16 Lanes 30 20 20 37 15 24 (Land Use Code 437) Total 36 21 21 43 15 25 Proposed CVS Pharmacy Without Drive Thru Window Operation (Net 21 15 31 31 38 40 New Traffic on Adjacent Roadways from Table 1) Note: All trips in vehicles per hour. Table 2 Trip Generation Existing Electrical Heating/Office Building and 16-Lane Bowling Alley As can be seen in Table 2,the proposed CVS Pharmacy,based on ITE data,is expected to generate more new traffic than the existing uses only during the Saturday midday peak. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Matti[uck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 23 1 1 1 DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,MattiNck-23140.00 24 File:'Mwpd iIn order to determine the origins and destinations of vehicles entering and exiting the proposed development,a directional distribution analysis was performed. A large percentage of site traffic visiting ' uses such as the proposed CVS Pharmacy is pass-by traffic from the adjacent traffic stream. The directional distribution analysis performed utilized the existing traffic patterns on the roadways in the study area taking into account the nature of the available approach roadways and driveway locations. Figure 5,Directional Distribution of Site-Generated Traffic,presents the directional distribution oftraffic that is expected to arrive at and depart from the proposed CVS pharmacy via the existing roadways. i 1 r WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 25 1 M 0 LO o M� F- w dLu U (�LO NOZLU -/. Z ' w n O -� Q N z Nui LL 0 ' F- � m w LO F- 0 U) w LD w z L-In :3cr -jO§ ' 0 L- CD Q Q (%OZ) LL O Z 1 LLJU z o w Q w _ ~ t DLO � Z Q ° o Uv) w ' LL 'ui_! m N U) ' o \° U) CD1 ° M co � I 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 TRAFFIC 1 ASSIGNMENT 1 ANALYSIS 1 t 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 27 The site-generated traffic estimates and the directional distribution were utilized to assign the expected generated traffic volumes at the proposed access points and on the adjacent roadway network. Figures ' 6,7,and 8,Assignment of Site-Generated Traffic,assign the site-generated traffic for the proposed CVS Pharmacy during the weekday morning and afternoon peak hours as well as the Saturday midday peak hour,respectively,using the directional distribution shown in Figure 5 and the trip generation estimates shown in Table 1. It should be noted that Figures 6, 7 and 8 represent the total site-generated traffic on the adjacent street system. These traffic volumes do not include a deduction for the pass-by trip generation credit. It should be pointed out that pass-by traffic will not add any additional traffic to the roadway network. However, the total traffic generation will be present as movements into and out of the access drives. Therefore,the access drive traffic volumes throughout this Traffic Impact Study include the traffic generated without the pass-by credit applied. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 28 � 1M� N N � W 1w Z z Y � g z z ~ 41 a O T -i F1 Ln UW NLLJ LL = O � Y 1 CDzow cn N w wLUa- z � LuQ o (J)) W 0 QQ dj LU W N� z 0 LO 04 0Q Q W m (7 � Cl) LO � CO 1 001 1 ' N LLIN 1 l�� M z w a- LLI Y CJ • £ LLJ Z z (L I oz F— — U) F1 e, g = 1 �1 LOW = N w 0 O � 1 O I zow MI w wWa— ' > = Z � � z (ZO C7 w d o w (D Z ' < 0 W (� W W 1 _ I w Z N (n Q G 1 w Cl) n --- L 1 w w l,, Q 0 1 0 _' OLr F— a0- v ~ (e) i— w ' Ll- (sa) m —� U) (7 ' 01 0 ' co ' — N 1 1N� z z Yw g z (�) W _ z ~ d sZ -r a ° —� a i r (-) o N LEL _ LL 0 O � W a �I W W W Q Z �_ Z 9 0 ❑ (s�) O C7 W Q LL Fn Z } QUp Z (� W Q N U Q U) 1 Lu z LLJ Q o 0 0 ' U Lo uim U) c� U) 10 � N 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 t i 1 PLANNED ROADWAY 1 IMPROVEMENTS AND 1 OTHER PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS 1 i 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 iFile:TIS.wpd 32 i 1 Planned Roadway Improvements ' The latest available Nassau-Suffolk Transportation Improvement (TIP) does not list any projects involving the reconstruction and improvement of roadways serving the proposed development prior to ' its expected completion. Other Planned Developments ' Discussions were held with representatives of the Town of Southold regarding other proposed ' developments pending in the vicinity of the site which may affect traffic conditions. While a number of projects were identified, they are considered minor in nature and their impacts are therefore considered to be included in the normal annual growth rate applied to background traffic. 1 A proposal is pending to develop a mini-mart convenience store within the existing Citgo ' gasoline/service station located on the northeast corner of Main Road and Factory Avenue and opposite the proposed CVS Pharmacy site. The existing Citgo gasoline/service station presentlyhas access to both ' Main Road and Factory Avenue. While this one pending project is expected to generate some traffic, its effects on the surrounding ' roadway network will be minor. Information presented in the HE Trip Generation report indicates that up to 78% of traffic patronizing gasoline/service stations with convenience markets is already on the ' roadway network for another purpose. Thus, for the purpose of this report, the traffic from this one pending project was considered to be included in the 2.0%annual growth factor applied to the seasonally adjusted existing counts to account for normal background traffic growth. r r r r r WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Matti[uck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 33 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ' ANALYSES 1 i 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 34 i Signalized Intersection ' In order to examine the impact of the site-generated traffic from the proposed development of a CVS Pharmacy on the adjacent roadways, intersection capacity analyses were performed at the signalized ' intersection noted below: • Main Road(NYS Route 25) at Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road The signalized intersection capacity analyses were performed for the weekday A.M.and P.M.peak hours ' as well as the Saturday midday peak hours. These intersection capacity analyses calculations were performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the latest (2000) edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersection capacity analyses were first performed to examine the 2003 existing traffic conditions. The ' December 2003 existing traffic volume counts collected were adjusted by seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, to represent the summer season. The weekday and Saturday seasonal adjustment factors were determined byusing the available seasonal traffic information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. This data consisted of traffic counts from a continuous counting station on Route 25 maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation. This counting station is on Route 25 in the vicinity of Laurel Lake Drive. ' Intersection capacity analyses were then calculated for the"2005 No-Build"condition. This examination projected the seasonally adjusted 2003 existing traffic volumes bya two year growth factor of two percent to determine the total traffic that would be on the roadways without the addition of the proposed CVS ' Pharmacy. The 2.0% annual growth factor was based on discussions with representatives of the New York State Department of Transportation and is aproduct of their Long Island Transportation Plan 2000. ' This is a long range transportation planning study which has, as part of their efforts, developed growth rates relating to traffic in the various Towns on Long Island based on detailed projections of socio- economic data. Next, the intersection capacity analyses were recalculated to review the same peak periods once the ' proposed development is open and operating(2005 Build condition). In the 2005 Build Condition,no trip credits were applied for the existing electrical heating/office building or the 16-lane bowling alley uses at the site. Finally, capacity analyses were performed to examine conditions with the implementation of the roadway modifications recommended in this report(2005 Build Condition with Modifications). ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 35 1 Methodoloev ' The signalized intersection capacity analysis methodology evaluates the average control delayper vehicle to determine intersection level of service. Several variables impact the measure of control delay, including quality ofprogression,cycle length,green ratio,and volume-to-capacity(V/Q ratio for the lane ' group in question. ' Level of service for a signalized intersection is defined in terms of the average control delay per vehicle during a peak 15 minute analysis period. Control delay consists of initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay,and final acceleration delay. Six levels of service,from A to F,have been established as measures of vehicle delay. These levels and their related control delay criteria are summarized in Table 3, Signalized Intersections-Level of Service Criteria. kh y r rv+ k 1 r. nr y ; A G 10.0 B 10.1 - 20.0 C 20.1 - 35.0 ' D 35.1 - 55.0 E 55.1 - 80.0 ' F > 80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2000. ' Table 3 ' Signalized Intersections Level of Service Criteria The results of these analyses are contained in Table A in the Appendix of this report under the section entitled, "Summary of Intersection Capacity Analyses". ' The analyses indicate that there will be no degradation in overall intersection level of service from the no-build to the build condition for the Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue intersection for all time periods studied. However, it is proposed that the side streets (Sigsbee Road and Factory Avenue) be restriped to provide two lanes. It is recommended that both Sigsbee Road and Factory Avenue be widened and restriped to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. These ' WHH\CVS Pharmacy,Matdtuck-23140.00 File:'nS.wpd 36 modifications result in a lower overall volume to capacity ratio(v/c)at the intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee Road/FactoryAvenue during all three peak period and improvement in level of service from LOS ' D to LOS C during the P.M. peak hour after the roadway modifications are implemented. ' Unsignalized Intersections Unsignalized intersection capacity analyses were performed to determine the ability of vehicles to safely negotiate turning movements at the key locations noted below: • Main Road at Site Access Drive • Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access ' The analyses were performed for the same scenarios as in the signalized capacity analyses. The analyses were performed in accordance with the methodology set forth in the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. Methodoloet ' The unsignalized intersection capacity analysis methodology evaluates the average control delay per ' vehicle to determine level of service. Level of service for a two-way stop-controlled intersection is defined solely for each minor movement. Several variables impact the measure of delay for a two-way stop-controlled intersection,including the level of conflicting traffic impeding a minor street movement ' and the size and availability of gaps in the conflicting traffic stream. ' Level of service for an unsignalized intersection is defined in terms of average control delay per vehicle during a peak 15 minute analysis period. Control delay consists of initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Six levels of service,ranging from A to F, ' have been established as measures of vehicle delay. These levels and their related control delay criteria are summarized in Table 4,Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Criteria. ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:'nS.wpd 37 ' 1 yo- fl t 'x 35� k Hwy '^ ,^X ¢ y�x F,w t{ •t�F i �*;f.- , :.ty �, ri A < 10.0 ' B 10.1 - 15.0 C 15.1 - 25.0 D 25.1 - 35.0 E 35.1 - 50.0 ' F > 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 2000. Table 4 ' Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Criteria ' Summaries of the results of the unsignalized capacity analyses are contained in Tables B and C in the Appendix in the section entitled, "Summary of Intersection Capacity Analyses". The results of the unsignalized intersection capacity analyses performed indicate that good levels of service are expected under the Build condition for right turns out of the site access driveway. Level of ' Service B, C, and C are expected for the 2005 Build Conditions during the Weekday A.M., Weekday P.M., and Saturday Midday peak periods, respectively. It is recommended that this access drive be ' designed to accommodate right tum in and out operation only and that a "Stop" sign be installed for exiting site traffic. The channelization through the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left tum restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles ' exiting the site,and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. Left turns into and out of the site will be prohibited at this driveway. The results of the unsignalized intersection capacity analyses performed indicate that the intersection of Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access is not significantly effected by the additional site traffic. Levels of Service are maintained from the 2003 Existing through 2005 Build Conditions for the Weekday A.M. and Weekday P.M. peak periods. However, during the Saturday ' Midday peak period, the capacity analyses results indicate a drop in level of service from LOS D in the 2005 No-Build Condition to LOS E in the 2005 Build Condition. It is recommended that Marlene Lane ' be restriped to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. The capacity analyses WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:nS.wpd 38 i ' indicate that the overall level of service of the northbound Marlene Lane approach would improve from LOS E in the 2005 Build Condition to LOS D with this modification. 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ROADWAY 1 MODIFICATIONS 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pbamacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:TIS.wpd 40 1 In order to mitigate the impact of the proposed CVS,as well as improve existing traffic conditions in the study area, the following roadway modifications are recommended: • Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue ' The northbound Sigsbee Road approach should be widened and restriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the northbound Sigsbee Road approach be striped to provide a ' combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. ' The southbound Factory Avenue approach should be restriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the southbound Factory Avenue approach be striped to provide a combined left tum/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. • Main Road at Site Access Drive It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate right tum in and out ' operation only and that a "Stop" sign be installed for exiting site traffic. The channelization through the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left turn restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site,and ' also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. Left turns into and out of the site will be prohibited at this driveway. • Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access tIt is recommended that the northbound Marlene Lane approach be restriped to provide a combined left tum/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 41 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ACCESS 1 EXAMINATION 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Maftituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 42 i 1 ' The proposed CVS Pharmacy will utilize four access points. The existing site has one access driveway on Main Road,informal access on Sigsbee Road,and two access driveways on Marlene Lane. Thus,the ' access plan for the proposed development will be similar to but formalize the current site's access. The access drives have been designed to be well-separated and to distribute the vehicles to several points, ' thereby minimizing the overall traffic impact. The following describes the four access points that will be used for the proposed CVS Pharmacy: ' 1. Main Road at Site Access Drive This access drive will provide for right turns into and out of the proposed CVS Pharmacy from Route 25. Currently, the Bowling Alley's access to Route 25 provides for full movements with no restriction of left turns. ' It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate right tum in and out operation only and that a"Stop"sign be installed for exiting site traffic. Channelization through ' the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left tum restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site, and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. 2. Sigsbee Road at Site Access Drive This unsignalized access point on Sigsbee Road will consist of one entering lane and one exiting lane and will provide full turning movements into and out of the site. Exiting traffic will be ' controlled with a"Stop"sign. ' 3. Marlene Lane at Site Access Drives ' Two access points are proposed on Marlene Lane. These access drives will provide full turning movements into and out of the site. Two lanes will exist at each of the two driveways,one lane for entering traffic and one lane for exiting traffic. Exiting traffic will be controlled with a"Stop" t sign. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:TLS.wpd 43 1 1 ' The absence of a shoulder/parking lane on Main Road along the site frontage eliminates any on-street parking opportunities. The appropriate"No Stopping Anytime"signs are posted along the site frontage ' of Main Road. This signage enforces the lack of on-street parking on the south side of Main Road and ensures adequate sight distance for vehicles exiting the site. 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS."d 44 1 i 1 PARKING 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:nS.wpd 45 The Town of Southold code requires that one parking space be provided for each two hundred (200) square feet of total floor area for retail uses such as the pharmacy proposed. Therefore,73 parking spaces ' are required based on a total 14,467 square foot pharmacy development. The site plan of the proposed development provides 77 total parking spaces (of which 4 are for handicapped patrons). Thus, the 77 ' spaces furnished exceed Town Code requirements and will be more than adequate to meet the needs of the patrons and employees of the proposed CVS pharmacy development. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS."d 46 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 ADDITIONAL 1 CONSIDERATIONS 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:TIS.wpd 47 Alternative Uses ' The site of the proposed CVS is zoned General Business(B)District. This zoning classification allows for a wide range of commercial and retail development under the Town of Southold Code. Each of these uses has associated with it the potential to generate varying levels of traffic. Among the uses allowed on the CVS site under the General Business District are retail stores. To present ' a comparison of the traffic generation characteristics of this other allowable use with the proposed CVS the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE)report Trip Generation was utilized to determine the site generated traffic for use of the site as retail shopping. Table 5, Trip Generation Alternative Site Use, presents the results of the trip generation calculations using ITE for the retail alternative. Also included in Table 5 is the trip generation of the proposed CVS for comparison. 1tAidday ' D (�p>h+"erlt �3u'dF i Fi�,s �t ,.r P h �r iti tt+.asr ' ' n , " dtiVb •!EIYt91 ESrlt Total Retail Shopping 14,467 S.F. 30 19 49 84 91 175 128 118 246 (Land Use Code 820) ' Proposed CVS Pharmacy 42 29 71 61 61 122 76 79 155 (Land Use Code 880) Table 5 Trip Generation Alternative Site Uses ' As Table 5 indicates,the retail use is expected to generate more traffic than the proposed CVS Pharmacy during the weekday P.M. peak hour and Saturday midday peak hours. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 48 ' Public Transportation Suffolk County Transit provides bus service to most of Suffolk County. The nearest bus route to the proposed CVS site provided by Suffolk County Transit is the S-92 connector bus line. This route has ' buses which travel along Main Road(NYS Route 25)in this area. The S-92 bus line originates in Orient Point at the Orient Point Ferry Terminal and travels east and west of the site on Main Road(NYS Route 25). Additional information can be found in the section of the Appendix entitled, "Public ' Transportation". ' Because of the proximity of the bus route to the proposed CVS, which would allow patrons and employees to use the bus to travel to and from the facility,it is expected that some may utilize the public transportation system. In this study, no credit was applied for use of public transportation. The traffic destined to and from the proposed CVS was based on the use of passenger cars only. However, the use ofpublic transportation bypatrons and employees would further reduce the traffic impact and the parking needs. Seasonal Traffic Variations Traffic conditions on the north fork of Long Island are subject to significant seasonal variations based ton the recreational nature of local attractions. The time constraints for this study did not allow for the counting of existing condition traffic data during the peak summer season. To account for this and to 1 present a worst case summer season analysis, adjustments were made to the December 2003 counted volumes. The existing winter traffic volume counts on Main Road were increased by a weekday seasonal adjustment factor of 33% and a Saturday seasonal adjustment factor of 47% to represent the summer ' season. The increase of 33% for a weekday and 47% for a Saturday was determined by using the available seasonal traffic information obtained from the New York State Department of Transportation. ' This data consisted of traffic counts from a continuous counting station on Route 25 maintained by the New York State Department of Transportation. This counting station is on Route 25 in the vicinity of Laurel Lake Drive. The existing December 2003 traffic volume counts on Sigsbee Road, Factory Avenue, Marlene Lane, and at the Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access Drive studied were also adjusted accordingly by the same seasonal adjustment factors of 33%and 47%determined and mentioned ' above for the weekday and Saturday,respectively. ' WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 49 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 CONCLUSIONS 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 50 1 1 1 ' Our study and analysis have concluded that with the roadway improvements described in this report,the development of the proposed CVS Pharmacy will have no adverse traffic impact on the adjacent highway ' network. Although the development of the proposed site will add traffic to the adjacent roadway network, the traffic impact will be minimized and the additional traffic will be accommodated by the modified roadway facilities. The following points should be recognized: ' I. The location and design of the access points will effectively distribute traffic to the adjacent roadways, including Main Road, Sigsbee Road, Factory Avenue, and Marlene Lane. ' 2. The access points to the site will be clearly visible to traffic on Main Road, Sigsbee Road, and Marlene Lane. No sight distance restrictions will exist in the vicinity of the driveways. ' 3. The proposed CVS Pharmacy will utilize four access points. The existing site has one access driveway on Main Road,informal access on Sigsbee Road,and two access driveways on Marlene Lane. Thus, the access plan for the proposed development will be similar to but formalize the current site's access. The access drives have been designed to be well-separated and to distribute the vehicles to several points, thereby minimizing the overall traffic impact. The following describes the four access points that will be used for the proposed CVS Pharmacy: • Main Road at Site Access Drive ' This access drive will provide for right turns into and out of the proposed CVS Pharmacy from Route 25. Currently, the Bowling Alley's access to Route 25 provides for full movements with no restriction of left turns. ' It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate right turn in and out operation only and that a"Stop"sign be installed for exiting site traffic. Channelization through the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left turn restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site, and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:TIS.wpd 51 1 ' 0 Sigsbee Road at Site Access Drive ' This unsignalized access point on Sigsbee Road will consist of one entering lane and one exiting lane and will provide full turning movements into and out of the site. Exiting ' traffic will be controlled with a"Stop" sign. • Marlene Lane at Site Access Drives Two access points are proposed on Marlene Lane. These access drives will provide full ' turning movements into and out of the site. Two lanes will exist at each of the two driveways,one lane for entering traffic and one lane for exiting traffic. Exiting traffic will be controlled with a"Stop" sign. The absence of a shoulder/parking lane on Main Road along the site frontage eliminates any on- street parking opportunities. The appropriate"No Stopping Anytime"signs are posted along the site frontage of Main Road. This signage enforces the lack of on-street parking on the south side ' of Main Road and ensures adequate sight distance for vehicles exiting the site. 4. It is anticipated that the development will not increase the accident experience with the timplementation of the described roadway improvements and the design of the access plan. 5. The site-generated traffic estimates for the proposed CVS Pharmacy have been based on the ITE "Trip Generation" report. The highest site-generated traffic can be expected to occur on a Saturday during the midday peak hour when an estimated 78 new vehicle trips per hour will be generated by the proposed CVS Pharmacy(38 in and 40 out). During the weekday P.M. peak hour,the site-generated volumes are anticipated to be 62 new vehicle trips per hour(31 in and 31 out). During the weekday A.M.peak hour,trip generation at the site will be lower when the site- generated traffic is expected to result in 36 new vehicle trips per hour(21 in and 15 out). The proposed CVS Pharmacy,based on ITE data, is expected to generate more new traffic than the existing uses only during the Saturday midday peak. ' 6. The proposed CVS Pharmacy will generate a peak hour traffic flow of 155 vehicles per hour ' (combined entering and exiting). This figure represents that amount of traffic which is diverted from other trip purposes (pass-by) plus the traffic whose sole trip purpose is to patronize the pharmacy. Using a pass-by credit of 50%for the peak hour of the site,the 155 vehicles attracted 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 ' File:TIS.wpd 52 by the site will actually add only 78 vehicles to the adjacent roadways. This increase in traffic will not have a significant impact on the operation of the adjacent intersections. 7. The current zoning of the site of the proposed CVS Pharmacy allows for the development of a ' number of commercial and retail uses. This includes use of the site for retail shopping. This alternative use of the site would be expected to generate higher levels of traffic than the proposed use during the weekday P.M. peak hour and Saturday Midday peak hour. ' 8. The existing "No Stopping Anytime" signs posted along the site frontage of Main Road re- enforce the lack of on-street parking on the south side of Main Road and ensure adequate sight distance for vehicles exiting the site. 9. In order to mitigate the impact of the proposed CVS, as well as improve existing traffic conditions in the study area, the following roadway modifications are recommended: • Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue ' The northbound Sigsbee Road approach should be widened and restriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the northbound Sigsbee Road approach be striped ' to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. ' The southbound Factory Avenue approach should be restriped to provide two 10-foot lanes. It is recommended that the southbound Factory Avenue approach be striped to provide a combined left tum/thru lane and a separate right turn lane. • Main Road at Site Access Drive It is recommended that this access drive be designed to accommodate right turn in and out operation only and that a "Stop" sign be installed for exiting site traffic. The ' channelization through the use of a raised median is recommended to enforce the left tum restriction for westbound vehicles entering the site access drive and for northbound vehicles exiting the site, and also to separate the entering and exiting traffic. Left turns into and out of the site will be prohibited at this driveway. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 53 ' Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access ' It is recommended that the northbound Marlene Lane approach be restriped to provide a combined left turn/thru lane and a separate right tum lane. ' 10. The intersection capacity analyses of the peak composite hours of highway traffic and pharmacy activity indicate that, with the implementation of the recommended roadway improvements,no ' adverse traffic impacts are expected on the adjacent roadway system. As a result of the addition of the site-generated traffic from the proposed CVS Pharmacy,there will be no degradation in the ' level of service at the adjacent signalized intersection of Main Road at Sigsbee Road/Factory Avenue and at the adjacent unsignalized intersection of Main Road at Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza Shopping Center Access after the recommended roadway improvements described in this report are implemented. 11. The Town of Southold Code requires that one parking space be provided for each two hundred (200) square feet of total floor area for pharmacy uses such as that proposed. Therefore, 73 ' parking spaces are required based on a total 14,467 square foot pharmacy development. The site plan of the proposed development provides 77 total parking spaces (of which 4 are for handicapped patrons). Thus,the 77 spaces famished exceed Town Code requirements and will be more than adequate to meet the needs of the patrons and employees of the proposed CVS Pharmacy development. ' 12. Due to the excellent patrol coverage and the close proximity of the firehouse, it should be recognized that excellent emergency services are available to service the proposed CVS ' Pharmacy. ' Since no adverse traffic impactswill occur for the proposed developmentwith the recommended roadway improvements described in this report, as indicated by our detailed traffic engineering examination and analysis, it is recommended that the proposed development be approved. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Matti[uck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 54 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX 1 1 1 i 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 55 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Summary of 1 Intersection Capacity 1 Analyses 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattltuck-23140.00 1 File:TIS.wpd 1 � . e a: z : CD § cq z�t , � o c / OL « « } S § lAA, CD \ � y. A» Cl)r ] A ■ - E6 JR ~y £ ca. £ m o o = [ P CL CL § ) ) \ / ) \ 7 ° .1 2 § o c = Ge £ L) CX f f \ / _ _ 2E > \ } § \ ( / \ ƒ 7 § / to C14 ( ) \ u J \ \ } \ \ � � ) § ] ] ] \ « § % IQ � 7 . . . ) � k \ \ § � UJq = 00 \ ® � | K § ] . } ( f $ 2m § . / 0 ! { 7 CO < ) ) ) ) ) \ � � ' U U m N w d rn N G� Q N ry d A V G U G o c w c � o m m ' a C VJ � M N � C 'a •w 7 � w ' N O A E E W 0 E g ' ~ a L ry ® r1 N Y 9 C � C ? L N d W C U O ❑y C y F z �n 3 �. a: \ « cy; N ` ■ \ � } . \ \ ; : � � \ \ � \ � � , N _ ! n § 2 k § § k2 \ k / R E 0 5iL 0 N6 E —0 CL 0 0 U) V) 0 2 Lu z k2 / � / / � � � k ! ) / � ! Z 0 2 m m w on CL \, -6 k / k \ � I \ I z k \ (n � ` � 'i ■ \ 3a f » % C. , - . . i & p / 1 2e 7 \° 2 . 7 . 0 v ) w : ■ %7 In - , � n / ) e ) ,�g7 + • ■ � m ) ■ a , _ inf ` § 7 \ , � y . § K cc k - � k _ - ; ' x < ; - IT - . ) ) � � a r. iu a- Ift z: , a a V N � . ria n � v � C N O N IN Op { cu, ° m o m ' m m J C d 7 d m m rn n N ) O N CA C E N C .4f Y � U -- Ly L ' G 0 cl ys :uta 3 v z° f iz' � 1 ttT tU�W rr_ rT YI � CD r O O �NOt o n o o eo N I W u • V r N =r a aur a o a N g C mC a) h D a7 O 0 A cmea rn rn N N n n E E A C to c_ I m cE 0 g s 1 5 b s 9 ' N m d C Q�1 Lrn > O O ry J m J J �2 C N 6 X a 4j4 W -1 C Q Fj 3 (C7 ^ ✓? IL 00 0 C O 2 N L W O d m $ g m > a N a a Z c a 9 c a a N N $ O c $ $ c o c d y v o g m og o m m o a g a a v 3 a d d 'a $ 'n $ 3 .m E u 0 m E s z E o � � E mB °yB o = m m 0s oma o m wKa 3w zI z2 (� 2 Z2 8 mm m23 8 3 1 1 1 1 i 1 Capacity Analyses Results 1 i 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,MattiNck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Main Road (NYS Route 25) 1 at 1 Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' WM\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 ' DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY ' INTERSECTION : hll #N Rt1#13 :: t013E,2$ A! 'a . I}#�# 11f0f ? 1 € E _; TIME PERIOD: AM' EXISTING YEAR #3 ' HORIZON YEAR DONE BY: DE14tti4Y APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB ' CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 8 5 12 32 4 60 36 437 4 10 514 20 ' WEEKDAY SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 11 7 16 43 5 80 48 581 5 13 684 27 3300 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 2.00 11 7 17 45 5 83 50 604 5 14 712 28 ' OTHER ' DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' FUTURE SEASONALLY ADJUSTED "NO BUILD"WITH 11 7 17 45 5 83 50 604 5 14 712 28 ' OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 7)CVS Pharmacy 12 4 0 2 3 0 0 13 5 2 0 0 ' PASS-BY CREDIT 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 SQ "BUILD"TRAFFIC 239 17 47 7 83 50 611 10 16 712 28 ' DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: P'IYI:..., '.:.;. TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : pmocapoAvawmiE.... ATSt�aSI OA :IA CE3GCyY;#11XE1%ItE TIME PERIOD: Pfd€ EXISTING YEAR 11 ' HORIZON YEAR 5: DONE BY: DEAfAY APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB se Es ws ' CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 6 8 13 77 11 64 65 617 13 10 535 15 ' WEEKDAYSEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 8 11 17 102 15 85 86 821 17 13 712 20 33.00 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 8 11 18 106 16 88 89 854 18 14 141 21 2.00 OTHER ' DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 811 18 106 16 88 89 854 18 14 741 21 OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 1)GVS Pha�cy 26 8 0 4 4 0 0 111 8 3 0 0 PASS-BY CREDIT 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 50 "BUILD"TRAFFIC 34 15 18 110 18 88 89 863 26 17 741 21 ' DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 ' FILE NAME: 8/4T TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY ' INTERSECTION : TIME PERIOD: $rA EXISTING YEAR ' HORIZON YEAR .,, DONE BY: DakY APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SS ES WB ' CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 9 8 18 88 15 82 75 538 4 20 528 25 ' SATURDAY SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 13 12 26 129 22 121 110 791 6 29 776 37 ' 47.00 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 2.00 14 12 27 134 23 126 114 823 6 30 807 38 ' OTHER ' DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 14 12 27 134 23 126 114 823 6 30 807 38 OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 1)CVS Pharmacy 34 10 0 5 5 0 0 23 10 4 0 0 PASS-BY CREDIT 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 50 ' BUILD"TRAFFIC 48 17 27 139 28 126 114 835 16 34 807 38 1 1 2003 Existing Condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Note: 1 1 . The December 2003 existing traffic volume counts collected were adjusted by 1 seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, to represent the summer season. The resulting seasonally adjusted 1 2003 existing traffic volumes were used in the 2003 Existing Condition. 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattiluck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type: All other areas ate : 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Weekday AM Peak Hour Year : 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R go. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR LTR LTR lue 48 58Itnem mWidth 11 . 0 1210 5 10 . 0 113 6145 27 11 16 . 0 16 43 12 0 80 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A LPeds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right IRight WB Right een 6 . 8 36 . 9 7 . 1 5 . 6 llow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 ' Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach vane Group Flow Rate 1 -p Capacity (s) V/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 182 1711 0 . 29 0 . 11 33 . 8 C 1175 1825 0 . 54 0 . 64 9 . 5 A 11 .4 B stbound 361 740 0 . 04 0 .49 10 . 9 B 872 1788 0 . 88 0 .49 30 .4 C 30 . 0 C trthbound LTR 183 1949 0 . 20 0 . 09 34 . 0 C 34 . 0 C tuthbound R 189 1677 0 . 72 0 . 11 47 . 3 D 47 . 3 D Intersection Delay = 23 . 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- , Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 52 1711 # 0 . 03 0 . 11 182 0 . 29 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 630 1825 0 . 35 0 . 64 1175 0 . 54 Right �stbound Prot Perm Left L 14 740 0 . 02 0 .49 361 0 . 04 Prot Perm tThru TR 764 1788 # 0 .43 0 . 49 872 0 . 88 Right orthbound Prot ' Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 37 1949 # 0 . 02 0 . 09 183 0 . 20 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left ' Prot Perm Thru LTR 137 1677 # 0 . 08 0 . 11 189 0 . 72 Right m of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v s) = 0 .56 Total lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec titical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 70 Control Delay and LOS Determination tr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach pe Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS itstbound 0 . 29 0 . 11 33 . 0 1. 000 182 0 . 11 0 . 9 0 . 0 33 . 8 C TR 0 . 54 0 . 64 7 . 8 1 . 000 1175 0 . 50 1 . 8 0 . 0 9 . 5 A 11 .4 B tstbound L 0 . 04 0 .49 10 . 7 1 . 000 361 0 . 50 0 . 2 0 . 0 10 . 9 B 0 . 88 0 .49 18 . 3 1 . 000 872 0 . 50 12 . 0 0 . 0 30 . 4 C 30 . 0 C torthbound IR 0 . 20 0 . 09 33 . 5 1 . 000 183 0 . 11 0 . 5 0 . 0 34 . 0 C 34 . 0 C ■ HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type: All other areas Date: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Weekday PM Peak Hour Year : 2003Existing(SeasonallyAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 10. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 LGConfig L TR L TR LTR LTR tnemWidth 11 . 0 1210 17 10 . 0 11 . 5 13 712 20 8 11 16 . 0 17 102 12 0 85 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A 1Peds Peds 3 Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right SB Right WB Right een 5 . 0 36 . 3 10 . 1 5 . 0 llow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ppr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/c g C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 143 1711 0 . 69 0 . 08 48 . 4 D 1118 1822 0 . 85 0 . 61 20 . 7 C 23 . 3 C stbound 126 263 0 . 12 0 .48 13 .4 B 859 1790 0 . 97 0 . 48 44 . 2 D 43 . 6 D trthbound LTR 169 1958 0 .24 0 . 09 34 . 9 C 34 . 9 C tuthbound R 257 1713 0 . 89 0 . 15 63 . 8 E 63 . 8 E Intersection Delay = 35 . 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- , Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Prot Perm Left L 98 1711 0 . 06 0 . 08 143 0 . 69 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 952 1822 # 0 . 52 0 . 61 1118 0 . 85 Right �estbound Prot Perm ' Left L 15 263 0 . 06 0 .48 126 0 . 12 Prot Perm Thru TR 832 1790 0 .46 0 .48 859 0 . 97 Right orthbound ' Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 41 1958 # 0 . 02 0 . 09 169 0 . 24 Right southbound Prot Perm Left ' Prot Perm Thru LTR 230 1713 # 0 . 13 0 . 15 257 0 . 89 ' Right 'gum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v s) = 0 . 68 ftal lost time per cycle, L = 12 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 80 Control Delay and LOS Determination Irpr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v c g C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 69 0 . 08 35 . 6 1 . 000 143 0 . 25 12 . 8 0 . 0 48 .4 D TR 0 . 85 0 . 61 12 . 5 1 . 000 1118 0 . 50 8 . 2 0 . 0 20 . 7 C 23 .3 C Lstbound L 0 . 12 0 . 48 11 . 5 1 . 000 126 0 . 50 1 . 9 0 . 0 13 . 4 B 1 0 . 97 0 .48 20 . 2 1 . 000 859 0 . 50 24 . 0 0 . 0 44 . 2 D 43 . 6 D Northbound IR 0 . 24 0 . 09 34 . 1 1 . 000 169 0 . 11 0 . 7 0 . 0 34 . 9 C 34 . 9 C ■ HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst: AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type: All other areas iate: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Year : 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St: Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 tGne Config L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 110 791 6 29 776 37 13 12 26 129 22 121 Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right IRight WB Right een 7 . 3 61 . 9 21. 1 6 . 1 llow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 120 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach � e Group Flow Rate Capacity (s) v c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 128 1711 0 . 95 0 . 08 120 . 3 F 1171 1825 0 . 76 0 . 64 19 . 6 B 31 . 7 C stbound 191 358 0 . 17 0 . 53 16 . 2 B i2 953 1786 0 . 95 0 . 53 45 . 3 D 44 .4 D trthbound LTR 129 1939 0 .43 0 . 07 56 . 2 E 56 . 2 E tuthbound �R 328 1710 0 . 92 0 . 19 77 . 2 E 77 . 2 E Intersection Delay = 43 . 4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- ' Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 122 1711 # 0 . 07 0 . 08 128 0 . 95 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 886 1825 0 . 49 0 . 64 1171 0 . 76 tRight stbound Prot Perm 1 Left L 32 358 0 . 09 0 . 53 191 0 . 17 Prot Perm Thru TR 903 1786 # 0 . 51 0 . 53 953 0 . 95 Right rthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 56 1939 # 0 . 03 0 . 07 129 0 .43 Right tuthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 301 1710 # 0 . 18 0 . 19 328 0 . 92 Right m of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 78 Total lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec Fitical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 90 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del p v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS itstbound 0 . 95 0 . 08 55 . 3 1 . 000 128 0 .46 65 . 0 0 . 0 120 . 3 F TR 0 . 76 0 . 64 15 . 0 1 . 000 1171 0 . 50 4 . 6 0 . 0 19 . 6 B 31 . 7 C Istbound L 0 . 17 0 . 53 14 . 3 1. 000 191 0 . 50 1 . 9 0 . 0 16 . 2 B 0 . 95 0 . 53 26 . 4 1 . 000 953 0 . 50 18 . 9 0 . 0 45 . 3 D 44 . 4 D forthbound IR 0 .43 0 . 07 53 . 8 1 . 000 129 0 . 11 2 . 3 0 . 0 56 . 2 E 56 . 2 E 1 1 2005 No-Build Condition 1 i 1 1 1 l I 1 1 *Note: 1 . 2005 No-Build Condition includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate as well as the expected traffic due to other planned developments and the roadway 1 improvements described in this report. 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type : All other areas iate : 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Weekday AM Peak Hour Year : 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 , 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 10. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 I�GConfig L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 50 604 5 14 712 28 11 7 17 45 5 83 ne Width 11. 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right felowRight WB Right en 6 . 8 36 . 9 7 . 1 5 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 182 1711 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 9 C 1175 1825 0 . 56 0 . 64 9 . 8 A 11 . 7 B stbound 353 724 0 . 04 0 .49 11 . 0 B 872 1788 0 . 91 0 .49 34 . 4 C 34 . 0 C Irthbound LTR 182 1945 0 . 21 0 . 09 34 . 1 C 34 . 1 C luthbound �R 189 1677 0 . 75 0 . 11 49 . 9 D 49 . 9 D Intersection Delay = 26 . 0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green - -Lane Group-- 1 Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound 1 Prot Perm Left L 54 1711 # 0 . 03 0 . 11 182 0 . 30 Prot Perm Thru TR 654 1825 0 . 36 0 . 64 1175 0 . 56 Right �stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 15 724 0 . 02 0 . 49 353 0 . 04 Prot Perm Thru TR 796 1788 # 0 .45 0 .49 872 0 . 91 Right rthbound Prot Perm Left Prot 1 Perm Thru LTR 38 1945 # 0 . 02 0 . 09 182 0 . 21 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left 1 Prot Perm Thru LTR 142 1677 # 0 . 08 0 . 11 189 0 . 75 Right Mm of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 58 Total lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec Iitical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 73 Control Delay and LOS Determination Irp pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 0 1 . 000 182 0 . 11 0 . 9 0 . 0 33 . 9 C TR 0 . 56 0 . 64 7 . 9 1. 000 1175 0 . 50 1 . 9 0 . 0 9 . 8 A 11 . 7 B Istbound L 0 . 04 0 . 49 10 . 7 1 . 000 353 0 . 50 0 . 2 0 . 0 11 . 0 B 0 . 91 0 . 49 18 . 9 1 . 000 872 0 . 50 15 . 5 0 . 0 34 . 4 C 34 . 0 C forthbound IR 0 . 21 0 . 09 33 . 5 1 . 000 182 0 . 11 0 . 6 0 . 0 34 . 1 C 34 . 1 C HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c ,nalyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve Agency: DEA Area Type : All other areas te: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Weekday PM Peak Hour Year : 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) oject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Cl onfig L TR L TR LTR LTR ume 89 854 18 14 741 21 8 11 18 106 16 88 e Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A 1 Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right IRight WB Right een 5 . 0 36 . 3 10 . 1 5 . 0 llow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Tine Group Flow Rate #p Capacity (s) v c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 143 1711 0 . 71 0 . 08 50 .4 D 1118 1822 0 . 89 0 . 61 23 .4 C 25 . 9 C stbound 101 211 0 . 16 0 .48 15 . 0 B TR 859 1790 1 . 01 0 .48 53 . 5 D 52 . 8 D Iirthbound luthbound R 169 1954 0 . 25 0 . 09 34 . 9 C 34 . 9 C �R 257 1714 0 . 93 0 . 15 70 . 4 E 70 .4 E Intersection Delay = 41 . 3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- ' Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound Prot Perm Left L 101 1711 0 . 06 0 . 08 143 0 . 71 Prot Perm Thru TR 990 1822 # 0 . 54 0 . 61 1118 0 . 89 Right �stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 16 211 0 . 08 0 .48 101 0 . 16 Prot Perm Thru TR 866 1790 0 . 48 0 .48 859 1 . 01 Right orthbound Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 42 1954 # 0 . 02 0 . 09 169 0 .25 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left ' Prot Perm Thru LTR 238 1714 # 0 . 14 0 . 15 257 0 . 93 Right um of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (V/s) = 0 . 70 tal lost time per cycle, L = 12 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 83 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 71 0 . 08 35 . 7 1 . 000 143 0 . 27 14 . 8 0 . 0 50 .4 D TR 0 . 89 0 . 61 13 . 1 1 . 000 1118 0 . 50 10 . 4 0 . 0 23 .4 C 25 . 9 C Istbound L 0 . 16 0 . 48 11 . 7 1 . 000 101 0 . 50 3 . 3 0 . 0 15 . 0 B 1 1 . 01 0 . 48 20 . 8 1 . 000 859 0 . 50 32 . 7 0 . 0 53 . 5 D 52 . 8 D Northbound IR 0 . 25 0 . 09 34 . 1 1 . 000 169 0 . 11 0 . 8 0 . 0 34 . 9 C 34 . 9 C HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type : All other areas te: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Year : 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) oject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R go. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 ine Config L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 114 823 6 30 807 38 14 12 27 134 23 126 Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right IRight WB Right een 7 . 3 61 . 9 21 . 1 6 . 1 llow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 120 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 128 1711 0 . 99 0 . 08 132 . 5 F 1171 1825 0 . 79 0 . 64 20 . 9 C 34 .4 C stbound 169 317 0 . 20 0 . 53 17 . 2 B 953 1786 0 . 99 0 . 53 53 .4 D 52 . 1 D #rthbound LTR 129 1940 0 .46 0 . 07 56 . 5 E 56 . 5 E luthbound R 328 1711 0 . 96 0 . 19 87 . 1 F 87 . 1 F Intersection Delay = 49 . 1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- ' Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 127 1711 # 0 . 07 0 . 08 128 0 . 99 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 921 1825 0 . 50 0 . 64 1171 0 . 79 Right �stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 33 317 0 . 10 0 . 53 169 0 . 20 Prot Perm Thru TR 939 1786 # 0 . 53 0 . 53 953 0 . 99 Right rthbound Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 59 1940 # 0 . 03 0 . 07 129 0 .46 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 315 1711 # 0 . 18 0 . 19 328 0 . 96 Right Mm of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = sum (v s) = 0 . 81 Total lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec titical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 94 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 99 0 . 08 55 . 5 1 . 000 128 0 . 49 77 . 0 0 . 0 132 . 5 F TR 0 . 79 0 . 64 15 . 6 1 . 000 1171 0 . 50 5 .4 0 . 0 20 . 9 C 34 . 4 C Istbound L 0 . 20 0 . 53 14 . 6 1 . 000 169 0 . 50 2 . 6 0 . 0 17 . 2 B 0 . 99 0 . 53 27 . 5 1 . 000 953 0 . 50 25 . 8 0 . 0 53 . 4 D 52 . 1 D forthbound IR 0 . 46 0 . 07 53 . 9 1 . 000 129 0 . 11 2 . 6 0 . 0 56 . 5 E 56 . 5 E 1 1 2005 Build Condition 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 *Note: 1 1 . 2005 Build Condition includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate, 1 the expected traffic due to other planned developments, the roadway improvements described in this report, and the traffic generated by the proposed development. 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 1 File:TIS.wpd i HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c 'nalyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve " gency: DEA Area Type : All other areas fr te: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Weekday AM Peak Hour Year : 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) oject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R go. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 (Config L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 50 611 10 16 712 28 23 9 17 47 7 83 ne Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A tRight P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A ' Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right Right WB Right Leeow n 6 . 8 36 . 9 7 . 1 5 . 6 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach �e Group Flow Rate Capacity (s) v c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 182 1711 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 9 C 1174 1823 0 . 57 0 . 64 10 . 0+ B 11 . 8 B stbound 346 709 0 . 05 0 . 49 11. 0 B TR 872 1788 0 . 91 0 . 49 34 .4 C 33 . 9 C Irthbound LTR 185 1968 0 . 29 0 . 09 34 . 6 C 34 . 6 C luthbound R 189 1683 0 . 78 0 . 11 53 . 6 D 53 . 6 D Intersection Delay = 26 .4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- ' Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 54 1711 # 0 . 03 0 . 11 182 0 . 30 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 668 1823 0 . 37 0 . 64 1174 0 . 57 Right �stbound Prot Perm Left L 17 709 0 . 02 0 .49 346 0 . 05 Prot Perm Thru TR 796 1788 # 0 . 45 0 .49 872 0 . 91 Right orthbound ' Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 53 1968 # 0 . 03 0 . 09 185 0 . 29 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 148 1683 # 0 . 09 0 . 11 189 0 . 78 ' Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 59 tal lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 74 Control Delay and LOS Determination lipr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 0 1 . 000 182 0 . 11 0 . 9 0 . 0 33 . 9 C TR 0 . 57 0 . 64 8 . 0 1 . 000 1174 0 . 50 2 . 0 0 . 0 10 . 0+ B 11 . 8 B istbound L 0 . 05 0 .49 10 . 8 1 . 000 346 0 . 50 0 . 3 0 . 0 11 . 0 B 1 0 . 91 0 .49 18 . 9 1 . 000 872 0 . 50 15 . 5 0 . 0 34 . 4 C 33 . 9 C Northbound iR 0 . 29 0 . 09 33 . 8 1 . 000 185 0 . 11 0 . 9 0 . 0 34 . 6 C 34 . 6 C HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type : All other areas ate: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Weekday PM Peak Hour Year : 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) oject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R 1o. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 (Config L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 89 863 26 17 741 21 34 15 18 110 18 88 ne Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A ' Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right CelowRight WB Right en 5 . 0 36 . 3 10 . 1 5 . 0 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach �e Group Flow Rate Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 143 1711 0 . 71 0 . 08 50 . 4 D 1117 1820 0 . 91 0 . 61 25 .4 C 27 . 7 C Istbound 90 182 0 . 21 0 . 48 17 . 3 B TR 859 1790 1 . 01 0 .48 53 . 5 D 52 . 7 D Irthbound LTR 171 1985 0 .44 0 . 09 36 . 6 D 36 . 6 D luthbound R 257 1716 0 . 95 0 . 15 77 . 0 E 77 . 0 E Intersection Delay = 42 . 8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- , Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 101 1711 0 . 06 0 . 08 143 0 . 71 Prot Perm Thru TR 1011 1820 # 0 . 56 0 . 61 1117 0 . 91 Right �stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 19 182 0 . 10 0 .48 90 0 . 21 Prot Perm Thru TR 866 1790 0 .48 0 .48 859 1 . 01 Right orthbound ' Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 76 1985 # 0 . 04 0 . 09 171 0 .44 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR 245 1716 # 0 . 14 0 . 15 257 0 . 95 ' Right Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 74 tal lost time per cycle, L = 12 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 87 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 71 0 . 08 35 . 7 1 . 000 143 0 . 27 14 . 8 0 . 0 50 .4 D TR 0 . 91 0 . 61 13 .4 1 . 000 1117 0 . 50 12 . 0 0 . 0 25 .4 C 27 . 7 C tstbound L 0 . 21 0 .48 12 . 0 1 . 000 90 0 . 50 5 . 3 0 . 0 17 . 3 B F1 . 01 0 .48 20 . 8 1 . 000 859 0 . 50 32 . 7 0 . 0 53 . 5 D 52 . 7 D Northbound �R 0 . 44 0 . 09 34 . 7 1 . 000 171 0 . 11 1 . 8 0 . 0 36 . 6 D 36 . 6 D HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c 11alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve Agency: DEA Area Type : All other areas te : 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Year : 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) oject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 1W St: Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1-0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Config L TR L TR LTR LTR lume 114 835 16 34 807 38 48 17 27 139 26 126 ne Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 . 0 12 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A ' Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right CelowRight WB Right en 7 . 3 61 . 9 21 . 1 6 . 1 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 120 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach rne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/c g C Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 128 1711 0 . 99 0 . 08 132 . 5 F 1169 1822 0 . 81 0 . 64 22 . 1 C 35 . 2 D #stbound 153 287 0 . 25 0 . 53 18 . 9 B TR 953 1786 0 . 99 0 . 53 53 .4 D 52 . 0 D #rthbound lR 132 1976 0 . 77 0 . 07 79 . 3 E 79 . 3 E uthbound #R 328 1713 0 . 98 0 . 19 93 . 7 F 93 . 7 F Intersection Delay = 51 . 3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- , Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 127 1711 # 0 . 07 0 . 08 128 0 . 99 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 946 1822 0 . 52 0 . 64 1169 0 . 81 Right �stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 38 287 0 . 13 0 . 53 153 0 . 25 Prot Perm Thru TR 939 1786 # 0 . 53 0 . 53 953 0 . 99 Right orthbound ' Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LTR 102 1976 # 0 . 05 0 . 07 132 0 . 77 Right �uthbound Prot Perm Left ' Prot Perm Thru LTR 323 1713 # 0 . 19 0 . 19 328 0 . 98 ' Right um of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 84 tal lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 97 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 99 0 . 08 55 . 5 1 . 000 128 0 .49 77 . 0 0 . 0 132 . 5 F TR 0 . 81 0 . 64 16 . 0 1 . 000 1169 0 . 50 6 . 1 0 . 0 22 . 1 C 35 . 2 D Istbound L 0 . 25 0 . 53 15 . 1 1 . 000 153 0 . 50 3 . 8 0 . 0 18 . 9 B 1 0 . 99 0 . 53 27 . 5 1 . 000 953 0 . 50 25 . 8 0 . 0 53 .4 D 52 . 0 D Northbound IR 0 . 77 0 . 07 55 . 1 1 . 000 132 0 . 32 24 . 2 0 . 0 79 . 3 E 79 . 3 E 1 1 1 1 1 2005 Build Condition 1 with Modifications 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Note: 1 1 . 2005 Build Condition with Modifications includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate, the expected traffic due to other planned developments, the 1 roadway improvements described in this report, the traffic generated by the proposed development, and the roadway modifications recommended in this report. 1 1 WIIB\CVS Pharmacy,Matfi[uck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 ■ HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c �alyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve gency: DEA Area Type : All other areas ate: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Weekday AM Peak Hour Year : 2005Build w/Mods (SeasAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 E/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R lo. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1-5 0 1 1 0 1 1 LGConfig L TR L TR LT R LT R 7 83 'lanemWidth 110 . 0 1210 10 10 . 0 11 . 5 16 71228 23 10 . 0 10 . 0 9 1747 10 . 0 110 . 0 RTOR Vol 0 0 3 20 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds Right EB Right fe lRight WB Right en 6 . 8 36 . 9 7 . 1 5 . 6 ow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 All Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ppr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Irne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound 182 1711 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 9 C 1174 1823 0 . 57 0 . 64 10 . 0+ B 11 . 8 B stbound 346 709 0 . 05 0 .49 11 . 0 B 872 1788 0 . 91 0 .49 34 . 4 C 33 . 9 C trthbound LT 157 1679 0 . 22 0 . 09 34 . 3 C 34 . 1 C 139 1478 0 . 11 0 . 09 33 . 5 C uthbound 188 1667 0 . 31 0 . 11 33 . 6 C 34 . 2 C 166 1478 0 . 41 0 . 11 34 . 7 C Intersection Delay = 24 . 6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET apacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green - -Lane Group-- tAppr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound ' Prot Perm Left L 54 1711 # 0 . 03 0 . 11 182 0 . 30 Prot Perm Thru TR 668 1823 0 . 37 0 . 64 1174 0 . 57 Right �estbound Prot Perm ' Left L 17 709 0 . 02 0 .49 346 0 . 05 Prot Perm Thru TR 796 1788 # 0 .45 0 .49 872 0 . 91 Right rthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT 35 1679 # 0 . 02 0 . 09 157 0 .22 Right R 15 1478 0 . 01 0 . 09 139 0 . 11 southbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT 59 1667 0 . 04 0 . 11 188 0 . 31 Right R 68 1478 # 0 . 05 0 . 11 166 0 .41 Mim of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 54 Total lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec titical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 68 Control Delay and LOS Determination hnnr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach kne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 0 . 30 0 . 11 33 . 0 1 . 000 182 0 . 11 0 . 9 0 . 0 33 . 9 C TR 0 . 57 0 . 64 8 . 0 1 . 000 1174 0 . 50 2 . 0 0 . 0 10 . 0+ B 11 . 8 B 9stbound L 0 . 05 0 .49 10 . 8 1 . 000 346 0 . 50 0 . 3 0 . 0 11 . 0 B 0 . 91 0 .49 18 . 9 1 . 000 872 0 . 50 15 . 5 0 . 0 34 .4 C 33 . 9 C Irthbound �' 0 . 22 0 . 09 33 . 6 1 . 000 157 0 . 11 0 . 7 0 . 0 34 . 3 C 34 . 1 C HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c Inalyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve Agency: DEA Area Type: All other areas late: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty eriod: Weekday PM Peak Hour Year : 2005Build w/Mods (SeasAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 �/W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Config L TR L TR LT R LT R lume 89 863 26 17 741 21 34 15 18 110 18 88 ane Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 10 . 0 10 . 0 10 . 0 10 . 0 iTOR Vol 0 0 3 20 Pkiration 0 .25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A tRight P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right FRight WB Right een 5 . 0 37 . 9 7 . 9 5 . 6 ellow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 1 Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 80 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 143 1711 0 . 71 0 . 08 50 . 4 D 1153 1820 0 . 88 0 . 63 21 . 6 C 24 . 2 C stbound 111 222 0 . 17 0 . 50 14 . 3 B TR 895 1790 0 . 97 0 . 50 42 . 6 D 42 . 0 D trthbound 158 1680 0 . 35 0 . 09 35 .4 D 34 . 9 C 139 1478 0 . 12 0 . 09 33 . 6 C (uthbound 204 1667 0 . 71 0 . 12 44 . 7 D 41 . 0 D 181 1478 0 .43 0 . 12 34 . 1 C Intersection Delay = 33 . 0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C Sec . . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- 1 Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio stbound Prot Perm Left L 101 1711 0 . 06 0 . 08 143 0 . 71 ' Prot Perm Thru TR 1011 1820 # 0 . 56 0 . 63 1153 0 . 88 Right stbound Prot Perm Left L 19 222 0 . 09 0 . 50 111 0 . 17 Prot Perm Thru TR 866 1790 0 . 48 0 . 50 895 0 . 97 Right Northbound Prot Perm Left Prot ' Perm Thru LT 56 1680 # 0 . 03 0 . 09 158 0 . 35 Right R 17 1478 0 . 01 0 . 09 139 0 . 12 uthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT 145 1667 # 0 . 09 0 . 12 204 0 . 71 Right R 77 1478 0 . 05 0 . 12 181 0 .43 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v/s) = 0 . 68 tal lost time per cycle, L = 12 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 80 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound L 0 . 71 0 . 08 35 . 7 1 . 000 143 0 . 27 14 . 8 0 . 0 50 .4 D 0 . 88 0 . 63 12 . 1 1. 000 1153 0 . 50 9 . 5 0 . 0 21 . 6 C 24 . 2 C tstbound L 0 . 17 0 . 50 10 . 9 1. 000 111 0 . 50 3 . 3 0 . 0 14 . 3 B t0 . 97 0 . 50 19 .4 1. 000 895 0 . 50 23 . 2 0 . 0 42 . 6 D 42 . 0 D Northbound t0 . 35 0 . 09 34 . 0 1 . 000 158 0 . 11 1 .4 0 . 0 35 .4 D 34 . 9 C HCS2000 : Signalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c talyst : AY Inter. : Main Rd & SigsbeeRd/FactoryAve Agency: DEA Area Type: All other areas te: 1/21/04 Jurisd: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riod: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Year : 2005Build w/Mods (SeasAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 W St : Main Road (NYS Route 25) NIS St : Sigsbee Road / Factory Avenue SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound ' L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Config L TR L TR LT R LT R lume 114 835 16 34 807 38 48 17 27 139 26 126 ane Width 11 . 0 12 . 0 10 . 0 11 . 5 10 . 0 10 . 0 10 . 0 10 . 0 ■ TOR Vol 0 0 4 30 ration 0 . 25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations ase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Left A NB Left A Thru P P Thru A Right P P Right A Peds Peds Left P SB Left A Thru P Thru A ' Right P Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right fRight WE Right een 9 . 3 61 . 9 17 . 1 8 . 1 ellow 3 . 7 4 . 1 3 . 9 3 . 9 1 Red 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 2 . 0 Cycle Length: 120 . 0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach 1ne Group Flow Rate p Capacity (s) v/� Delay LOS Delay LOS stbound 157 1711 0 . 81 0 . 09 79 . 6 E 1199 1822 0 . 79 0 . 66 19 . 9 B 27 . 0 C stbound 173 324 0 . 22 0 . 53 17 . 7 B TR 953 1786 0 . 99 0 . 53 53 .4 D 52 . 0 D l�rthbound 140 1677 0 . 51 0 . 08 55 . 9 E 54 . 9 D 123 1478 0 . 21 0 . 08 52 . 2 D luthbound 264 1668 0 . 69 0 . 16 55 .4 E 52 .4 D 234 1478 0 .46 0 . 16 47 . 2 D Intersection Delay = 41 . 1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = D Sec . CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET pacity Analysis and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Green --Lane Group-- , Appr/ Lane Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio Ratio Capacity v/c Mvmt Group (v) (s) (v/s) (g/C) (c) Ratio Eastbound stbound Prot Perm Left L 127 1711 # 0 . 07 0 . 09 157 0 . 81 Prot Perm Thru TR 946 1822 0 . 52 0 . 66 1199 0 . 79 Right stbound Prot Perm ' Left L 38 324 0 . 12 0 . 53 173 0 . 22 Prot Perm Thru TR 939 1786 # 0 . 53 0 . 53 953 0 . 99 Right orthbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT 72 1677 4 0 . 04 0 . 08 140 0 . 51 Right R 26 1478 0 . 02 0 . 08 123 0 . 21 �uthbound Prot Perm Left ' Prot Perm Thru LT 183 1668 4 0 . 11 0 . 16 264 0 . 69 Right R 107 1478 0 . 07 0 . 16 234 0 . 46 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v s) = 0 . 75 tal lost time per cycle, L = 16 . 00 sec itical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc) (C) / (C-L) = 0 . 87 Control Delay and LOS Determination pr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach ne Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS In stbound 0 . 81 0 . 09 53 . 5 1 . 000 157 0 . 35 26 . 1 0 . 0 79 . 6 E 0 . 79 0 . 66 14 . 6 1 . 000 1199 0 . 50 5 . 3 0 . 0 19 . 9 B 27 . 0 C stbound L 0 . 22 0 . 53 14 . 8 1 . 000 173 0 . 50 2 . 9 0 . 0 17 . 7 B 1 0 . 99 0 . 53 27 . 5 1 . 000 953 0 . 50 25 . 8 0 . 0 53 .4 D 52 . 0 D Northbound ]� 0 . 51 0 . 08 52 . 7 1 . 000 140 0 . 12 3 . 3 0 . 0 55 . 9 E 54 . 9 D 1 1 Main Road (NYS Route 25) at the 1 Site Access Drive I 1 I i I 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Matdtuck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY 1 INTERSECTION : MIN RC# I S ROUT I AI '. A,M 1} 1 TIME PERIOD: EXISTING YEAR 3 ' HORIZON YEAR 20115: DONE BY: DBIViIY . APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R DEC. 2003 EXISTING 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 470 11 0 544 0 WEEKDAYSEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 625 15 0 724 0 3300 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 0 D 5 0 0 0 0 650 16 0 753 0 2.00 OTHER ' DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 650 16 0 753 0 OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC 1)GVS Pharmacy 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 2 0 PASS-BY CREDIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 50 ' BUILD"TRAFFIC D 0 11 0 0 0 D 650 31 0 754 0 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: P"Itl ? TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY 1 INTERSECTION : Mll1N.R+E1417r ISJ , . 0111E2i ATATTEAIr+GES DI-}SSE . TIME PERIOD: PA9 EXISTING YEAR tjtt HORIZON YEAR: Atl DONE BY: DJklf , APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB 1 0N13 N L: T R Ir .: DEC. 2003 EXISTING 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 700 7 0 560 0 WEEKDAY SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTFACTOR 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 931 9 0 745 0 33.00 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 0 0 9 0 0 D 0 969 9 0 775 0 2 00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S=OTw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 969 9 0 775 0 1 OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 1)CVS Pharmacy 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 3 0 PASS:: Y':GR1=t'�t:::•::::: . ::': =:r'b::;.: :D';:'.'. :::0 '::'' :':::0 :::.:: E3'::::':'.':.:: ::::..:.:.... .:.... ... .....::::.. :.:. : : :..:. . B.. .. .. I. .. ..::: : ........ . . ..: .. ......... .. .....:.101 11.11010. :1. .. . : ::Ci .:;;:;:tf ..;.:.:. ::...::::::Q.:. .:.::.:.. .: .::..:...:.::.. :.. ::.:.....: ..:: ::::::. ::::.:::....:::..:::.:.:..... .....::.:.... :..:...::.::: :.:::.: .:: .:.. ..:. . .... . : .:: BUILD....TRAFFac:....::::.....:......;;.;:.: D::•:::::::::,::::0:r:: 21::::::.:;:::::::.0::• ::.:::: ::::s:.::::::: <:::::...::::::: ;:::::::. ........... :::::::...:.:..:::::::::.:.:.:::.::..,. ...:.::.:. :.. : :::::::.: :•:,:::.:..:0 .;........Q .:.:::::::..:D .::.: 96 3 ;:..:.:31. ... :. ::.0 ::. .:72:7 : ...:.0 ... DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: 1kT...,:::<,:.:<:....,::.;:«z TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : Nli�!IN 1 ?p�i . IstYSFtOlT ::�5 �lT I #1Ert, CIFI`lil ' TIME PERIOD: $4t7 EXISTING YEAR X93 HORIZON YEAR DONE BY: t3I»AfAY APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R DEC. 2003 EXISTING 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 639 5 0 573 0 SATL1FiDPY SEA6QMAL :: :; :::'::::::::'.:D: :" :'<: ":::::::::::0 ': '::';D. :: : '<III `::,`:.i . 4. . ..... . NT. .A� .... . ::::::.::.:.t� : <.....::..... .. ..,.................<:: D .::.::.:$39:,:::::,:::;::3 .:.:.:.:.:.:R 47.00 ' PER 0 D 7 D 0 13 0177 7 D . 876 Il. 2.00 OTHER 1 DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. . ..,....... FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 977 7 0 876 0 OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC 1)CVS Pharmacy 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 4 0 ' PASS-BY CREDIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 50 "BUILD"TRAFFIC 0 0 23 0 D 0 0 977 35 0 878 0 1 1 ! ' 2005 Build Condition 1 1 i 1 1 1 ' *Note: 1 1 . 2005 Build Condition includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate, the expected traffic due to other planned developments, the roadway improvements described in this report, and the traffic generated by the proposed development. WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattimck-23140.00 1 File:nS.wpd 1 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c ■ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY analyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA (te Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Inst/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Site Access Drive tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 650 31 754 (ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 722 34 837 rcent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided Channelized? nes 1 0 1 Configuration TR T stream Signal? No No Ffinor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 ` 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 11 Bak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 trcent Grade (g) 0 0 than Storage ared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No Ines 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Iproach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config R (vph) 12 m) (vph) 417 v/c 0 . 03 % queue length 0 . 09 ntrol Delay 13 . 9 LOS B Ipproach Delay 13 . 9 pproach LOS B HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c lalter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates Main Street sthampton Beach, NY 11978 Mione: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA to Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive (risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Site Access Drive Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments (r'ajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 L T R L T R lume 650 31 754 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 Cak-15 Minute Volume 181 9 209 urly Flow Rate, HFR 722 34 837 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Idean Type Undivided Channelized? nes 1 0 1 Configuration TR T Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T R L T R Volume 11 ak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 ak-15 Minute Volume 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 rcent Grade ('s) 0 0 dian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage I Channelized? No Lanes 1 lonfiguration R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments vements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ne Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 lking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet IFLeft-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through trksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ared n volume, major th vehicles : areI d n volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : tam t flow rate, major rt vehicles : ber of major street through lanes : Irksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation �vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 6 . 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Xhv) 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3 , 1t) 0 . 00 t (c,T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 4c) 1-stage 6 . 2 2-stage llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R tf,base) 3 . 30 t (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 f) 3 . 3 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type rffective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) 1roportion vehicles arriving on green P (q1) g(q2) ■$(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f t'x platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) toportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 12) 0 . 000 ( (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) Uubo) restrained or unconstrained? oportion Itblocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 8) P (9) 10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L L L T R L T R V c, x 739 t V c,u,x r,x plat,x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c, x) s �(x) (c,u,x) �(r,x) (plat,x) Frksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 739 tential Capacity 417 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 417 obability of Queue free St. 0 . 97 1 . 00 Iep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 Conflicting Flows Itential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1 . 00 1 . 00 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tp. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1. 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 Sep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Inflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 i . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 97 Movement Capacity i Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows ctential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 11op. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Mart 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows (tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity M rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows ttential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 1 . 00 Movement Capacity sult for 2 stage process : a It Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1. 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 97 1vement Capacity Results for Two-stage process : C Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 12 ovement Capacity (vph) 417 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 417 lume 12 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh SUM C sep ' act 11rksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 the Config R v (vph) 12 (m) (vph) 417 c 0 . 03 95%- queue length 0 . 09 (ntrol Delay 13 . 9 S B proach Delay 13 . 9 Approach LOS B Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Vil) , ) 1 . 00 1 . 00 ) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY mgalyst : AY ency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty gnits : U. S . Customary nalysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Oast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Site Access Drive ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R f L T R 'Volume 969 31 777 ieak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 curly Flow Rate, HFR 1076 34 863 ercent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided 'T Channelized? anes 1 0 1 Configuration TR T rpstream Signal? No No 'Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 21 ceak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 23 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 cared rcent Grade (�) 0 0 dian Storage Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No Les 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service tproach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config R ' (vph) 23 (m) (vph) 261 v/c 0 . 09 % queue length 0 . 29 ntrol Delay 20 . 1 LOS C pproach Delay 20 . 1 pproach LOS C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates ,6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 1hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA tto Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive (risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project .ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 tst/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Site Access Drive Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments iTajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 969 31 777 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 Cak-15 Minute Volume 269 9 216 urly Flow Rate, HFR 1076 34 863 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Idian Type Undivided Channelized? nes 1 0 1 Configuration TR T stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R a'olume 21 tak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 ak-15 Minute Volume 6 urly Flow Rate, HFR 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 rcent Grade M 0 0 dian Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No Lanes 1 configuration R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet t2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Fa ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : t flow rate, major th vehicles : Qat flow rate, major rt vehicles : Ver of major street through lanes : Itrksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation 1vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t (c,base) 6 . 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 hv) 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 k3, T) : de/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 , lt) 0 . 00 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 �c) 1-stage 6 . 2 2-stage llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 3 . 30 t f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 f) 3 . 3 `orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) Lprog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type 'ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) portion vehicles arriving on green P l) C2) ■g(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha toothing ta avel time, t (a) (sec) Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Irx platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) ■ proportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 12) 0 . 000 ( (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) t(subo) nstrained or unconstrained? flocked portion (1) (2) (3) minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 99) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 1093 Ix V c,u,x r,x plat,x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c, x) s �(x) (c,u,x) C (r, x) � (plat,x) �orksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 onflicting Flows 1093 otential Capacity 261 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 'ovement Capacity 261 robability of Queue free St . 0 . 91 1 . 00 step 2 : LT from Major St. 4 1 onflicting Flows Potential Capacity ,edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 ovement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 Jaj L-Shared Prob Q free St . tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 rp. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 11tep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 festrian flicting Flows ential Capacity Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 rj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 91 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 (rt 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor ltp. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . rt 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity sult for 2 stage process : a t Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Op. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity Irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Ip. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 91 11 vement Capacity Results for Two-stage process : C Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume (vph) 23 vement Capacity (vph) 261 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Ulsep 261 ume 23 Delay sep sep +1 and (Qsep +1) max sh SUM C sep I act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config R v (vph) 23 m) (vph) 261 c 0 . 09 queue length 0 . 29 CSoach rol Delay 20 . 1 C Delay 20 . 1 Approach LOS C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 foj ) 1 . 00 1 . 00 il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 dJML d , LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Late Performed: 1/21/04 Inalysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2005Build (SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 itst/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Site Access Drive intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 L T R L T R Volume 977 35 878 (ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 1085 38 975 rcent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided Channelized? Les 1 0 1 Configuration TR T stream Signal? No No Pfinor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 23 ak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 urly Flow Rate, HFR 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 lrcent Grade M 0 0 than Storage ared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No Ines 1 Configuration R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config R (vph) 25 m) (vph) 257 v/c 0 . 10 % queue length 0 . 32 ntrol Delay 20 . 5 1 LOS C Ipproach Delay 20 . 5 pproach LOS C 1 HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c ,alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates ■6 Main Street sthampton Beach, NY 11978 O ne: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA t to Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Site Access Drive trisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 tst/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Site Access Drive Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 .25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 977 35 878 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 fak-15 Minute Volume 271 10 244 urly Flow Rate, HFR 1085 38 975 ercent Heavy Vehicles -- -- -- -- Idian Type Undivided Channelized? nes 1 0 1 Configuration TR T Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume 23 JP ak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 90 ak-15 Minute Volume 6 urly Flow Rate, HFR 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 frcent Grade ($) 0 0 than Storage ared Approach: Exists? Storage Channelized? No Lanes 1 'onfiguration R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments movements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through tm rksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : tuber of major street through lanes : irksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation �vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 6. 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 Ohv) 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3, 1t) 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 Ic) 1-stage 6 . 2 2-stage llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L L L T R L T R f,base) 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 f) 3 . 3 'orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals mputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog tal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type 1fective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) oportion vehicles arriving on green P Fql) ( (q2) i(q) amputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Ix platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) Ioportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 2) 0 . 000 5) 0 . 000 p (dom) subo) nstrained or unconstrained? P,Xoportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 8) )9) 10) 11) J12) �putation 4 and 5 gle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c, x 1104 'x V c,u,x r, x plat,x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c, x) s �(x) (c,u,x) i(r,x) (plat, x) irrksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 1104 tential Capacity 257 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 257 obability of Queue free St. 0 . 90 1 . 00 Iep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 Conflicting Flows Cdement ential Capacity estrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Capacity Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 Itj L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1. 00 1 . 00 Cement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Inflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 90 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 0 tep 3 : TH from Minor St . S 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows otential Capacity �edestrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt ovement Capacity Probability of Queue free St . M Mart 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Fap tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor . Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt ovement Capacity Wart 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows tential Capacity destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 1 . 00 tvement Capacity Capacity sult for 2 stage process : a It Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 rt 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 9p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows tential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt vement Capacity 1rt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 0tential Capacity 1destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1 . 00 0 . 90 1vement Capacity Results for Two-stage process : C ■ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 25 ovement Capacity (vph) 257 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) ■ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 257 lume 25 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh SUM C sep act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Fvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config R v (vph) 25 9m) (vph) 257 c 0 . 10 95% queue length 0 . 32 (ntrol Delay 20 . 5 S C proach Delay 20 . 5 Approach LOS C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Woj ) 1 . 00 1 . 00 il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 tNumber of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 Main Road (NYS Route 25) 1 at 1 Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza 1 Shopping Center Access Driveway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 ' DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 ' FILE NAME: AM, ..........._...; TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY ' INTERSECTION : NIAN R }{ISYS RUT1. 1flhR - R-11LN1W"I'tI LEI�L I:PP f F ! TIME PERIOD: EXISTING YEAR ml ' HORIZON YEAR DONE BY: DE.NAY APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB ' CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 6 0 10 0 1 8 8 442 4 16 572 3 WEEKDAY SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 8 0 13 0 1 11 11 588 5 21 761 4 ' 33.00 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 2.00 8 0 14 0 1 11 11 612 5 22 792 4 ' OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 8 0 14 0 1 11 11 612 5 22 792 4 ' OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 1)GVS Pharmacy 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 6 0 13 2 0 ' PASS-BY CREDIT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 ' "BUILD"TRAFFIC 8 0 19 0 2 11 11 615 5 35 793 4 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 ' FILE NAME: pM:;i:..:..:..::::..:.:.::.:.: TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY INTERSECTION : MAIN RD; P RT25 A'#' AIN I . F F 1 ..9 . 12' IPF IR;! TIME PERIOD: P1Yt EXISTING YEAR ' HORIZON YEAR 21IOtr DONE BY: D)rlUl1YX:, . APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ' ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES Na SB EB WB ' CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 7 6 29 0 1 53 12 727 6 31 570 14 WEEKDAY SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR 9 8 39 0 1 70 16 967 8 41 758 19 3300 GROWTH PERCENT PER YEAR 2.00 9 8 41 0 1 73 17 1006 8 43 789 20 ' OTHER ' DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE "NO BUILD"WITH 9 8 41 0 1 73 17 1006 8 43 789 20 ' OTHER DEV. SITE TRAFFIC ' 1)CVS Pharmacy 0 1 10 0 1 0 0 12 0 19 3 0 ' PASS-BYCREDIT 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 ' 'BUILD"TRAFFIC 9 9 51 0 2 73 17 1012 8 62 791 20 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ' 66 MAIN STREET, WESTHAMPTON BEACH, NEW YORK 11978 FILE NAME: $AT; #. TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY ' INTERSECTION : IM11iN RD NYS RT 2:6 AT:MiRLENE'::LN/MAfl7TUCK=PLZ SHPP CTR TIME PERIOD: S#[C' EXISTING YEAR 3 ' HORIZON YEAR DONE BY: pow APPROACH 168 Dwelling Units ALT X CLEARS INPUT VALUES NB SB EB WB CONDITION L T R L T R L T R L T R ' DEC. 2003 EXISTING 10 2 37 1 7 50 33 593 11 30 492 8 SATEJRQAI'SEA 3DNAL ADJUSTME. T:.MOTOR c' 3 ' .' .:;. :::}; `:; "![I :: :': :' :':: :.....'':' ,. ....:::.:.:.::.....:.::::::.:::::. : :74....:.:.:as ..,..;87 ..:... i.6. :;..:..A.4 .:...:.:::: :.::.:::.:..:............:... 47.00 :.:.:':::: ; ...... .. .....:::: ::.::.::::............ .. P:ER:YEAR::::. t# .. ..:T.:.:<........5..... ....9tf7 2.00 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FUTURE ': . : : :' .:":: :;"' NO.OukI�`:';lff�lThL: .' ':'. ..i6 . .3. 56 I :: 1� :: .:77: :::51:;'.;:J07 t7 :. . 46 :. :75:2: 12 ' iirt�frR au SITE TRAFFIC 1)CVS Pharmacy 0 1 13 0 1 0 0 16 0 24 4 0 PASS=BYGREL)IT':: :.. U : ':; 0 : : '0 ;".:.::(2 '.::. :;.:fi li : ;::.0 :' $ ' : :.0:: BUILD.:::TRAFFIC: .. :.: : fi ,..........'i . i E ,.....77 .......51....:,:91.5 :.:::.�� 70.::.:754 .Z2: 1 1 1 2003 Existing Condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 *Note: 1 1 . The December 2003 existing traffic volume counts collected were adjusted by 1 seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, to represent the summer season. The resulting seasonally adjusted 2003 existing traffic volumes were used in the 2003 Existing Condition. 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY gInalyst : AY ency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty Units : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2003Existing(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Iast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 M Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R 7olume 11 588 5 21 761 4 ieak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 curly Flow Rate, HFR 12 646 5 23 836 4 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL 'T Channelized? anes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR rupstream Signal? No No inor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 13 1 11 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 14 1 12 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 frcent Grade (g) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ine Config L L LTR TR ' (vph) 12 23 22 13 (m) (vph) 795 935 316 349 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 02 0 . 07 0 . 04 ° queue length 0 . 05 0 . 08 0 . 22 0 . 12 ntrol Delay 9 . 6 8 . 9 17 . 2 15 . 7 LOS A A C C Ipproach Delay 17 . 2 15 . 7 pproach LOS C C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates '6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 lihone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA Onto Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane falysis risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary Year: 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ?Tajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 11 588 5 21 761 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 Cak-15 Minute Volume 3 162 1 6 209 1 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 646 5 23 836 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 8 0 13 1 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 4 0 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 14 1 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (%) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage i Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 �nfiguration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments vements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 tne Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through �orksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 tared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : � t flow rate, major rt vehicles : tuber of major street through lanes : trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 c,hv) 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 O(hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 .20 0 . 20 0 . 10 tade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 (3 , lt) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c,T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 ,(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 forksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type 0 ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) p (from Exhibit 16-11) C(q2) portion vehicles arriving on green P l) g (q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) 1pha beta avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f rx platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) uiration of blocked period, t (p) proportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 ■ mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) U(subo) strained or unconstrained? Proportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II (1) p (4) (7) 0(8) (9) (10) (11) 1(12) lomputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 1 V c, x 840 651 1562 1558 648 1559 838 Ix V c,u,x r,x C plat,x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 �(c,x) 672 890 672 886 884 675 s 1700 1700 1700 (x) (c,u,x) C(r,x) I(plat,x) Irksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 648 838 tential Capacity 470 366 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 470 366 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 97 tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 onflicting Flows 651 840 fdement ential Capacity 935 795 estrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1. 00 Capacity 935 795 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 98 0 . 98 SL-Shared Prob Q free St . ep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 1558 1559 tential Capacity 112 112 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 96 vement Capacity 108 108 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 tnflicting Flows 1562 tential Capacity 91 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 96 0 . 96 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 97 0 . 97 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 Movement Capacity 85 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance I Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 to rt 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 672 884 tential Capacity 454 363 tedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 98 vement Capacity 447 354 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 rt 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 886 675 t tential Capacity 363 453 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 98 tvement Capacity 354 446 rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1558 1559 Ftential Capacity 112 112 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 96 tvement Capacity 108 108 Msult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 .45 0 . 78 t 225 225 Probability of Queue free St. 1 . 00 1 . 00 �:ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 trt 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 672 tential Capacity 445 343 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 98 vement Capacity 438 335 Irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 890 tential Capacity 337 444 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 96 vement Capacity 317 424 Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 1562 Potential Capacity 91 1destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 96 0 . 96 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 97 0 . 97 Cap. Adj , factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 it vement Capacity 85 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 60 C t 201 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume (vph) 8 0 14 1 12 vement Capacity (vph) 201 225 470 225 366 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 316 349 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Ulsep 201 225 470 225 366 ume 8 0 14 1 12 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 316 349 SUM C sep I act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Fvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 e Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 12 23 22 13 Im) (vph) 795 935 316 349 �( c 0 . 02 0 . 02 0 . 07 0 . 04 95% queue length 0 . 05 0 . 08 0 . 22 0 . 12 1ntrol Delay 9 . 6 8 . 9 17 . 2 15 . 7 S A A C C proach Delay 17 . 2 15 . 7 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 oj ) 0 . 98 0 . 98 il) , volume for stream 2 or 5 W(i2) , volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 6 8 . 9 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA ate Performed: 1/21/04 Ualysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty nits : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) roject ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 ast/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 ■ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 L T R L T R Volume 16 967 8 41 758 19 seak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ourly Flow Rate, HFR 16 996 8 42 781 19 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- 2 -- -- Median Type TWLTL LChannelized? es 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR rupstream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 9 8 39 1 70 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 40 1 72 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (!k) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR ' Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 16 42 57 73 (m) (vph) 823 690 228 383 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 06 0 . 25 0 . 19 % queue length 0 . 06 0 . 19 0 . 96 0 . 69 ntrol Delay 9 . 5 10 . 6 26 . 0 16 . 6 LOS A B D C Ipproach Delay 26 . 0 16 . 6 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA Mate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 .25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Yrajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 L T R L T R lume 16 967 8 41 758 19 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 Fak-15 Minute Volume 4 249 2 11 195 5 urly Flow Rate, HFR 16 996 8 42 781 19 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 9 8 39 1 70 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 2 10 0 18 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 40 1 72 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Ircent Grade (%) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage # Channelized? 1 Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through �orksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 shared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : .Qat flow rate, major rt vehicles : umber of major street through lanes : 11rksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation rvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R C(c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 (c, hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 (hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 Wade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 (3, lt) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 0 . 00 I(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 .2 5 . 5 6 . 2 Ulow-Up Time Calculations l vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 (HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type lffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) p (from Exhibit 16-11) C(q2) portion vehicles arriving on green P l) ■$(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Ux platooned flow, V(c,max) 'n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) Itoportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) U(subo) restrained or unconstrained? oportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 8) p (9) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V C, x 800 1004 1943 1916 1000 1910 790 Ix V c,u, x r, x plat, x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 1032 911 1032 884 874 1036 s 1700 1700 1700 (x) (c,u,x) (r,x) (plat,x) �orksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step l : RT from Minor St . 9 12 onflicting Flows 1000 790 otential Capacity 295 390 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ovement Capacity 295 390 robability of Queue free St . 0 . 86 0 . 82 1tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1004 800 iitential Capacity 690 823 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 690 823 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 94 0 . 98 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St. 8 11 nflicting Flows 1916 1910 tential Capacity 68 68 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 92 vement Capacity 63 63 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 95 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 inflicting Flows 1943 tential Capacity 49 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 92 0 . 88 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 94 0 . 91 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 76 0 . 78 Movement Capacity 37 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1032 874 otential Capacity 310 367 iedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 94 ovement Capacity 304 345 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 1 . 00 ,art 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 884 1036 Oatential Capacity 363 309 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 341 303 Wart 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1916 1910 latential Capacity 68 68 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 92 ifvement Capacity 63 63 sult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 92 1 .42 t 172 164 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 95 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 iart 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 1032 tential Capacity 281 347 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 �p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 94 vement Capacity 276 326 Irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 911 tential Capacity 328 275 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 76 0 . 83 vement Capacity 250 227 1[rt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 1943 tential Capacity 49 idestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 92 0 . 88 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 94 0 . 91 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 76 0 . 78 vement Capacity 37 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 21 C t 132 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 9 8 40 1 72 ovement Capacity (vph) 132 172 295 164 390 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 228 383 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 132 172 295 164 390 olume 9 8 40 1 72 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 228 383 SUM C sep I act 'orksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service fvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 16 42 57 73 t■(m) (vph) 823 690 228 383 c 0 . 02 0 . 06 0 . 25 0 . 19 959- queue length 0 . 06 0 . 19 0 . 96 0 . 69 (ntrol Delay 9 . 5 10 . 6 26 . 0 16 . 6 S A B D C proach Delay 26 . 0 16 . 6 Approach LOS D C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Cj ) 0 . 98 0 . 94 l) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M,LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 5 10 . 6 Number of major street through lanes (rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA ,Pate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty nits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2003Existing (SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 last/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 L T R L T R Volume 49 872 16 44 723 12 leak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 curly Flow Rate, HFR 52 937 17 47 777 12 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL 11aChannelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR If stream Signal? No No 'Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 15 3 54 10 74 Cak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 16 3 58 10 79 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (%-) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 52 47 77 89 m) (vph) 831 720 223 334 v/c 0 . 06 0 . 07 0 . 35 0 . 27 �% queue length 0 . 20 0 . 21 1 . 46 1 . 05 ntrol Delay 9 . 6 10 . 3 29 . 4 19 . 6 LOS A B D C �pproach Delay 29 . 4 19 . 6 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA tate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (alysis risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its: U. S . Customary Year: 2003Existing(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Itst/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R 'Folume 49 872 16 44 723 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 13 234 4 12 194 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 52 937 17 47 777 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- (dean Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 15 3 54 10 74 tak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 4 1 15 3 20 urly Flow Rate, HFR 16 3 58 10 79 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (a) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage �' Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 tane width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through Jpjorksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ■ Movement 2 Movement 5 hared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : umber of major street through lanes : �rksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Fvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Vc,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 ,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 v) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 Uade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 (3 , 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c,T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 ,(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ffective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) j(oportion vehicles arriving on green P q1) g (q2) $(q) 15omputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Ux platooned flow, V(c,max) in platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) oportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) lIsubo) nstrained or unconstrained? firoportion Itiblocked (1) (2) (3) Tor minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, vements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II to(1) p (4) '(7) (8) p (9) (10) 0(11) (12) mputation 4 and 5 'ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L L L T R L T R 1 V c, x 789 954 1972 1933 946 1935 783 �x c,u, x r,x plat,x two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c, x) 1050 922 1050 883 877 1058 s 1700 1700 1700 (x) (c,u,x) C (r,x) � (plat,x) �orksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations 'Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 onflicting Flows 946 783 otential Capacity 317 394 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 povement Capacity 317 394 robability of Queue free St . 0 . 82 0 . 80 �tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 onflicting Flows 954 789 Potential Capacity 720 831 'edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ovement Capacity 720 831 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 93 0 . 94 iaj L-Shared Prob Q free St . tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 it nflicting Flows 1933 1935 tential Capacity 66 66 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 rrpe. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 88 0 . 88 ment Capacity 58 58 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 98 0 . 93 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1972 tential Capacity 47 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 82 0 . 86 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 86 0 . 89 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 69 0 . 73 ovement Capacity 32 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1050 877 otential Capacity 304 366 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 93 ovement Capacity 285 342 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 99 0 . 97 Wart 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 883 1058 lotential Capacity 364 301 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 94 Movement Capacity 340 282 0 art 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1933 1935 lotential Capacity 66 66 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 88 0 . 88 ovement Capacity 58 58 esult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 99 1 . 60 t 157 152 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 98 0 . 93 tep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage inflicting Flows 1050 tential Capacity 275 346 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 93 vement Capacity 258 323 frt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 922 tential Capacity 324 267 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 �p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 73 0 . 76 vement Capacity 235 202 (rt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 1972 tential Capacity 47 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 U . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 82 0 . 86 � j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 86 0 . 89 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 69 0 . 73 vement Capacity 32 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 50 C t 112 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 it 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 16 3 58 10 79 ovement Capacity (vph) 112 157 317 152 394 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 223 334 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 112 157 317 152 394 olume 16 3 58 10 79 Delay Sep Sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 223 334 SUM C sep ' act 'orksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 the Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 52 47 77 89 ) (vph) 831 720 223 334 0 . 06 0 . 07 0 . 35 0 . 27 U queue length 0 . 20 0 . 21 1 . 46 1. 05 CSoach rol Delay 9 . 6 10 . 3 29 .4 19 . 6 A B D C Delay 29 . 4 19 . 6 Approach LOS D C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Cj ) 0 . 94 0 . 93 l) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 6 10 . 3 Number of major street through lanes (rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1 2005 No-Build Condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Note: 1 1 . 2005 No-Build Condition includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for ' the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate as well as the expected traffic due to other planned developments and the roadway 1 improvements described in this report. 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:ns.wpd 1 1 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY talyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty rnits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Iast/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 11 612 5 22 792 4 iak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 672 5 24 870 4 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL FChannelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No 11inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 14 1 11 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 15 1 12 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (%) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage IChannelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service IA proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR 1 (vph) 12 24 23 13 m) (vph) 772 915 306 334 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 03 0 . 08 0 . 04 % queue length 0 . 05 0 . 08 0 . 24 0 . 12 ntrol Delay 9 . 7 9 . 0 17 . 7 16 . 2 LOS A A C C Approach Delay 17 . 7 16 . 2 pproach LOS C C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c Lalter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates F6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone : (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS tnalyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA �te Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty nits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 ast/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 11 612 5 22 792 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 feak-15 Minute Volume 3 168 1 6 218 1 curly Flow Rate, HFR 12 672 5 24 870 4 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR If stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1L T R L T RT R L T R lume 8 0 14 1 11 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 4 0 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 15 1 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 cent Grade M 0 0 t han Storage 1 Approach: Exists? No No Storage IChannelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR �� Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments 11ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 faared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : t flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : tuber of major street through lanes : 11 rksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 it 12 L L L T R L T R t (c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 1 (c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 (hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 Vade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 l t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c,T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 i(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 1 'orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V (t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type rffective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) RP (from Exhibit 16-11) portion vehicles arriving on green P l) C2) i(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha eta avel time, t (a) (sec) . nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Fx platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) uration of blocked period, t (p) toportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 12) 0 . 000 ( (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) subo) ( ) nstrained or unconstrained? portion tir locked (1) (2) (3) minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 8) 99) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 1L L L T R L T RL L T R L T R V c,x 874 677 1624 1620 674 1621 872 'x V c,u,x r,x plat, x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 698 926 698 922 920 701 s 1700 1700 1700 (x) (c,u,x)(c,u,x) i(r,x) (plat,x) trksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 674 872 tential Capacity 455 350 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 455 350 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 97 [ep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 onflicting Flows 677 874 itential Capacity 915 772 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 915 772 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 98 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 1620 1621 tential Capacity 103 103 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 96 vement Capacity 99 99 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 Up 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 1-nflicting Flows 1624 tential Capacity 82 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 95 0 . 96 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 96 0 . 97 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 94 Movement Capacity 76 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Etep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 art 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 698 920 otential Capacity 442 350 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 97 ovement Capacity 435 341 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 tart 2 - Second Stage onflicting Flows 922 701 Jotential Capacity 349 441 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 97 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 340 434 rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1620 1621 ttential Capacity 103 103 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 96 ovement Capacity 99 99 Wsult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 .47 0 . 78 t 215 215 Orobability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 1 . 00 11 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 698 tential Capacity 431 327 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 97 vement Capacity 424 318 Irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 926 tential Capacity 322 430 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 95 vement Capacity 302 409 Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 1624 tential Capacity 82 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 95 0 . 96 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 96 0 . 97 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 94 vement Capacity 76 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1. 63 C t 190 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume (vph) 8 0 15 1 12 vement Capacity (vph) 190 215 455 215 350 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 306 334 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R vSep 190, 215 455 215 350 olume 8 0 15 1 12 Delay 1 Sep Sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 306 334 SUM C Sep 1 act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Ivement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 12 24 23 13 m) (vph) 772 915 306 334 c 0 . 02 0 . 03 0 . 08 0 . 04 95% queue length 0 . 05 0 . 08 0 . 24 0 . 12 1ntrol Delay 9 . 7 9 . 0 17 . 7 16 .2 S A A C C proach Delay 17 . 7 16 . 2 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Woj ) 0 . 98 0 . 97 il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 7 9 . 0 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Inalyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA ate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty [nits : U. S . Customary nalysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 ast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 E Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 17 1006 8 43 789 20 ieak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 curly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1037 8 44 813 20 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? anes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR (stream Signal? No No inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T R L T R Volume 9 8 41 1 73 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 42 1 75 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 frcent Grade (%) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage LChannelized? es 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service B-proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 17 44 59 76 (m) (vph) 800 666 216 366 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 07 0 . 27 0 . 21 % queue length 0 . 07 0 . 21 1 . 07 0 . 77 ntrol Delay 9 . 6 10 . 8 27 . 8 17 .4 LOS A B D C �pproach Delay 27 . 8 17 .4 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c [alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates W6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA te Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour � ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 tst/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Wfajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Wlume 17 1006 8 43 789 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 Fak-15 Minute Volume 4 259 2 11 203 5 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1037 8- 44 813 20 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 than Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1L T R L T RT R L T R lume 9 8 41 1 73 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 2 11 0 19 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 8 42 1 75 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 frcent Grade M 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 lonfiguration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments vements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ne Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 lking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn 1 Through iprksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ■ Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : Fi ber of major street through lanes : trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Oc,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 .20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3 , 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Ubase) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 llorksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) p (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) (q2) g(q) 2 omputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) 'Nlpha toothing ta avel time, t (a) (sec) Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Irx platooned flow, V(c,max) 'n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) ■ proportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) t(subo) nstrained or unconstrained? oportion Itblocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II IF 1) p (4) 7) 8) 09) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 833 1045 2024 1996 1041 1990 823 'x V c,u,x r,x plat, x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 1075 949 1075 921 911 1079 s 1700 1700 1700 �(x) (c,u,x) C (r,x) '(plat,x) rrksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ep 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 1041 823 tential Capacity 279 373 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 11vement Capacity 279 373 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 85 0 . 80 ep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 Lubnflicting Flows 1045 833 Potential Capacity 666 800 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 666 800 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 93 0 . 98 L-Shared Prob Q free St . S'tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 1996 1990 tential Capacity 60 61 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 91 0 . 91 vement Capacity 55 56 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 95 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 2024 tential Capacity 43 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 91 0 . 87 f0pi. L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 93 0 . 90 Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 74 0 . 76 - ement Capacity 32 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 art 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1075 911 otential Capacity 296 353 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 93 ovement Capacity 290 330 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 1 . 00 art 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 921 1079 lotential Capacity 349 295 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 326 289 0 art 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1996 1990 potential Capacity 60 61 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 91 0 . 91 ovement Capacity 55 56 sult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 93 1 .45 t 162 153 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 95 0 . 99 11tep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 1075 tential Capacity 266 331 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 �p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 93 vement Capacity 260 309 (rt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 949 tential Capacity 313 260 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tp. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 74 0 . 81 vement Capacity 233 210 trt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2024 tential Capacity 43 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 91 0 . 87 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 93 0 . 90 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 74 0 . 76 vement Capacity 32 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 24 C t 122 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 9 8 42 1 75 ovement Capacity (vph) 122 162 279 153 373 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 216 366 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 122 162 279 153 373 lume 9 8 42 1 75 Delay ' sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 216 366 SUM C sep act �rksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 17 44 59 76 t■(m) (vph) 800 666 216 366 c 0 . 02 0 . 07 0 . 27 0 . 21 95% queue length 0 . 07 0 . 21 1 . 07 0 . 77 (ntrol Delay 9. 6 10 . 8 27 . 8 17 .4 S A B D C proach Delay 27 . 8 17 .4 Approach LOS D C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 1(0j ) 0 . 98 0 . 93 (il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 (i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 6 10 . 8 1Number of major street through lanes (rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ,nalyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA to Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty riits : U. S . Customary ialysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 (st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 51 907 17 46 752 12 (ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 975 18 49 808 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL LChannelized? es 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR upstream Signal? No No TTinor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 16 3 56 10 77 Cak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 3 60 10 82 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (g) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage IChannelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 54 49 80 92 (m) (vph) 809 696 206 320 v/c 0 . 07 0 . 07 0 . 39 0 . 29 % queue length 0 . 21 0 . 23 1 . 72 1 . 16 ntrol Delay 9 . 8 10 . 6 33 . 2 20 . 7 LOS A B D C �pproach Delay 33 . 2 20 . 7 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates W6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail: TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Inalyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA (te Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2005No-Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Inst/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 51 907 17 46 752 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 Iak-15 Minute Volume 14 244 5 12 202 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 975 18 49 808 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume 16 3 56 10 77 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 4 1 15 3 21 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 3 60 10 82 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (°s) 0 0 median Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 12 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through I�orksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ■ Movement 2 Movement 5 Tared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : �t flow rate, major rt vehicles: tuber of major street through lanes : trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 . 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 .2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 k(hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 9ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 (3, 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 �(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 Illlow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f, base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 torksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type lffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) (q2) (q) omputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha eta ravel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f 'ax platooned flow, V(c,max) in platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) roportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 'Lwomputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) 11(subo) nstrained or unconstrained? oportion Enblocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II L �(1) p (4) (7) 0(8) (9) 0) 1) U2) Umputation 4 and 5 gle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c, x 820 993 2050 2010 984 2013 814 Rx V c,u,x r,x C plat,x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 f(c,x) 1092 958 1092 918 912 1101 s 1700 1700 1700 (x) (c,u,x) � (r,x) (plat,x) 'orksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 onflicting Flows 984 814 otential Capacity 301 378 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ovement Capacity 301 378 robability of Queue free St . 0 . 80 0 . 78 1tep 2 : LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 993 820 potential Capacity 696 809 pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Movement Capacity 696 809 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 93 0 . 93 ,aj L-Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 2010 2013 otential Capacity 59 59 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 �p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 87 0 . 87 vement Capacity 51 51 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 98 0 . 93 11tep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 (nflicting Flows 2050 tential Capacity 41 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 81 0 . 85 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 85 0 . 88 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 67 0 . 71 Movement Capacity 27 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 art 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1092 912 otential Capacity 291 353 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 93 ovement Capacity 272 328 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 99 0 . 97 art 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 918 1101 lotential Capacity 350 288 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 93 Movement Capacity 325 269 Wart 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2010 2013 'otential Capacity 59 59 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 87 0 . 87 iovement Capacity 51 51 esult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 00 1 . 64 t 147 142 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 98 0 . 93 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 fart 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 1092 tential Capacity 260 331 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 93 vement Capacity 243 308 (rt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 958 tential Capacity 309 252 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 71 0 . 74 vement Capacity 218 186 trt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2050 otential Capacity 41 (j . destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 81 0 . 85 L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 85 0 . 88 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 67 0 . 71 Irvement Capacity 27 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 58 C t 101 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R �olume (vph) 17 3 60 10 82 ovement Capacity (vph) 101 147 301 142 378 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 206 320 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches 10-vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 101 147 301 142 378 lume 17 3 60 10 82 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 206 320 SUM C sep act �rksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Mn ement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 54 49 80 92 ■(m) (vph) 809 696 206 320 c 0 . 07 0 . 07 0 . 39 0 . 29 95W queue length 0 . 21 0 . 23 1 . 72 1. 16 (ntrol Delay 9 . 8 10 . 6 33 .2 20 . 7 S A B D C proach Delay 33 . 2 20 . 7 Approach LOS D C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 (oj ) 0 . 93 0 . 93 (il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 (i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 ( 6 (oj ) d (M,LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 8 10 . 6 1Number of major street through lanes (rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1 1 1 1 1 2005 Build Condition 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 *Note: ' 1 . 2005 Build Condition includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate, 1 the expected traffic due to other planned developments, the roadway improvements described in this report, and the traffic generated by the proposed development. 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mahituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Inalyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA ate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty nits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Iast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 615 5 35 793 4 Vurent -Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ly Flow Rate, HFR 12 675 5 38 871 4 Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL LChannelized? es 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR If stream Signal? No No Piinor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 8 0 19 2 11 Wak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 20 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (g) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service iproach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 12 38 28 14 m) (vph) 771 912 317 317 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 04 0 . 09 0 . 04 queue length 0 . 05 0 . 13 0 . 29 0 . 14 ntrol Delay 9 . 7 9 . 1 17 . 5 16. 9 LOS A A C C ,pproach Delay 17 . 5 16 . 9 pproach LOS C C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c falter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street sthampton Beach, NY 11978 Shone : (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS talyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA tto Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 tst/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 1 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 11 615 5 35 793 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ak-15 Minute Volume 3 169 1 10 218 1 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 675 5 38 871 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1L T R L T RT R L T R Volume 8 0 19 2 11 lak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 5 1 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 20 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (°s) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage I Channelized? 1 Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments movements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn IThrough rksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : IrLer rate, major rt vehicles: tuber of major street through lanes : 11rksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V(c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 (c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 (hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 tc, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 .20 0 .20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 ( (3 , lt) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c,T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 0 . 00 (c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R a (f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 ,(HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 (f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (q1) (q2) �(q) omputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha eta tavel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f x platooned flow, V(c,max) in platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) Itoportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) U(subo) restrained or unconstrained? oportion Itblocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II (1) p (4) 1(7) 8) P (9) 10) 11) ( 0(12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 IL L L T R L T R V c,x 875 680 1658 1653 678 1653 873 9x V c,u,x r,x plat,x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 702 956 702 951 949 704 s 1700 1700 1700 (X) (c,u,x)(c,u,x) C(r,x) , (plat, x) 'orksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 onflicting Flows 678 873 tential Capacity 452 349 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 rvement Capacity 452 349 robability of Queue free St. 0 . 96 0 . 97 �tep 2 : LT from Major St. 4 1 onflicting Flows 680 875 itential Capacity 912 771 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 912 771 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 96 0 . 98 SL-Shared Prob Q free St. ep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 113 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 1653 1653 tential Capacity 98 98 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 Ip. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 vement Capacity 92 92 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 inflicting Flows 1658 tential Capacity 78 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 93 0 . 94 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 95 0 . 96 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 91 Movement Capacity 72 1 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance y Utep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 Tart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 702 949 Potential Capacity 440 339 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 96 ovement Capacity 433 325 Probability of Queue free St. 1 . 00 0 . 99 0 Wart 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 951 704 gotential Capacity 338 440 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 324 433 ■art 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1653 1653 otential Capacity 98 98 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 1ovement Capacity 92 92 'Result for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1. 55 0 . 77 t 206 204 Probability of Queue free St. 1 . 00 0 . 99 tep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 702 otential Capacity 429 315 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 96 ovement Capacity 422 302 cart 2 - Second Stage onflicting Flows 956 otential Capacity 310 427 tedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 94 ovement Capacity 285 402 lart 3 - Single Stage onflicting Flows 1658 Potential Capacity 78 (edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 aj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 93 0 . 94 aj . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 95 0 . 96 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 91 1ovement Capacity 72 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 74 C t 182 ■ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 8 0 20 2 12 ovement Capacity (vph) 182 206 452 204 349 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 317 317 ■ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 182 206 452 204 349 olume 8 0 20 2 12 Delay ' sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 317 317 SUM C sep act 'orksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 12 38 28 14 tm) (vph) 771 912 317 317 c 0 . 02 0 . 04 0 . 09 0 . 04 95% queue length 0 . 05 0 . 13 0 . 29 0 . 14 (ntrol Delay 9 . 7 9 . 1 17 . 5 16 . 9 S A A C C proach Delay 17 . 5 16 . 9 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 1(oj ) 0 . 98 0 . 96 (il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 (i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 U(i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 7 9 . 1 1Number of major street through lanes (rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 Ialysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty rnits : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2005Build (SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 ast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlz5hppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 .25 E Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 17 1012 8 62 791 20 ieak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 curly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1043 8 63 815 20 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL lT Channelized? anes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR upstream Signal? No No ■inor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 9 9 51 2 73 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 9 52 2 75 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 frcent Grade (°s) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage LChannelized? es 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service n-proach EB WE Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 17 63 70 77 (m) (vph) 798 662 216 357 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 10 0 . 32 0 .22 g queue length 0 . 07 0 . 31 1 . 34 0 . 81 ntrol Delay 9. 6 11 . 0 29 . 5 17 . 8 LOS A B D C Ipproach Delay 29 . 5 17 . 8 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 lone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst: AY Agency/Co. : DEA tto Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane trisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 11st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ITajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 17 1012 8 62 791 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 tak-15 Minute Volume 4 261 2 16 204 5 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1043 8 63 815 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- - - Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T R L T R Volume 9 9 51 2 73 fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 2 13 1 19 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 9 52 2 75 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (°s) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data ' Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet �2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through r Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles 0 Movement 2 Movement 5 0 hared In volume, major th vehicles : hared In volume, major rt vehicles: at flow rate, major th vehicles: Eat flow rate, major rt vehicles : mber of major street through lanes : 117rksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation rvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t (c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 .2 (c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 (hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c,g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 .20 0 . 20 0 . 10 kade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 (3 , 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 '(c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 .2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . S 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 torksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals omputation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) y (q2) l(q) omputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha eta ravel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f ax platooned flow, V(c,max) in platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) ■ proportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 'Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) ■(subo) nstrained or unconstrained? Uoportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II (1) p (4) '(7) (8) p (9) (10) 0(11) (12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L L L T R L T R V c,x 835 1051 2071 2042 1047 2036 825 Ix V c,u,x r, x plat,x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 1081 990 1081 961 951 1085 s 1700 1700 1700 i(x) (c,u,x) C (r,x) I(plat,x) rrksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ep 1 : RT from Minor St. 9 12 nflicting Flows 1047 825 tential Capacity 277 372 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tvement Capacity 277 372 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 81 0 . 80 tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 nflicting Flows 1051 835 Potential Capacity 662 798 tdestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 662 798 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 90 0 . 98 rL-Shared Prob Q free St . ep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 2042 2036 tential Capacity 56 57 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 89 vement Capacity 50 50 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 94 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Conflicting Flows 2071 tential Capacity 40 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 87 0 . 83 1j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 90 0 . 87 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 71 Movement Capacity 29 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance tep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 art 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1081 951 otential Capacity 294 338 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 90 ovement Capacity 288 306 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 99 art 2 - Second Stage onflicting Flows 961 1085 iotential Capacity 335 293 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 90 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 303 287 Mart 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2042 2036 potential Capacity 56 57 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 89 Movement Capacity 50 so 0 esult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 01 1 .47 t 154 140 Irobability of Queue free St . 0 . 94 0 . 99 tep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage 11onflicting Flows 1081 tential Capacity 264 315 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 90 vement Capacity 258 285 Part 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 990 tential Capacity 297 256 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 77 vement Capacity 213 197 irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2071 tential Capacity 40 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j _ L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 87 0 . 83 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 90 0 . 87 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 71 vement Capacity 29 esults for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1. 37 t 115 ■ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 9 9 52 2 75 ovement Capacity (vph) 115 154 277 140 372 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 216 357 r Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 115 154 277 140 372 lume 9 9 52 2 75 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 216 357 SUM C sep I act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Ivement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 17 63 70 77 m) (vph) 798 662 216 357 c 0 . 02 0 . 10 0 .32 0 . 22 95% queue length 0 . 07 0 . 31 1 .34 0 . 81 1ntrol Delay 9 . 6 11 . 0 29 . 5 17 . 8 S A B D C proach Delay 29. 5 17 . 8 proach LOS D C Ai rksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay IMovement 2 Movement 5 Ci2) , j ) 0 . 98 0 . 90 l) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 6 11 . 0 INumber of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c Inalyst : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY AY gency/Co. : DEA ate Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty nits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 Iast/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 t Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street : Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 51 915 17 70 754 12 (ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 983 18 75 810 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL LChannelized? es 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No fTinor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 16 4 69 11 77 bak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 4 74 11 82 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (%-) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? nes 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration LTR TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Iproach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LTR TR (vph) 54 75 95 93 m) (vph) 807 692 204 304 v/c 0 . 07 0 . 11 0 . 47 0 . 31 #W queue length 0 . 21 0 . 36 2 . 24 1 . 26 ,ntrol Delay 9 . 8 10 . 8 37 . 2 22 . 0 1 LOS A B E C Ipproach Delay 37 . 2 22 . 0 pproach LOS E C 1 HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c ralter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 iihone : (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA Into Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour t ersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Build(SeasonallyAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 tst/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ,Tajor Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 r L T R L T R lume 51 915 17 70 754 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 Iak-15 Minute Volume 14 246 5 19 203 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 983 18 75 810 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Ithan Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Vblume 16 4 69 11 77 tak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 4 1 19 3 21 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 4 74 11 82 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 Inrcent Grade (o) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage Channelized? 1 Lanes 0 1 0 1 0 configuration LTR TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through rksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : Fz ber of major street through lanes : trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Oc,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 c,hv) 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 c, g) 0 . 20 0 .20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t(3, lt) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 Ic) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R a f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 1 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type ffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) $(q2) ■(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 ' V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha (eta avel time, t (a) (sec) oothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Uplatooned flow, V(c,max) x n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) toportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) U(subo) restrained or unconstrained? oportion Nhhlocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II I IF 1) p (4) �(7) (8) p (9) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R s V c,x 822 1001 2112 2072 992 2075 816 Rx V c,u, x r,x plat, x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 E(c,x) 1100 1012 1100 972 966 1109 s 1700 1700 1700 �(x) (c,u,x) �(r,x) (plat,x) Irrksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 992 816 tential Capacity 298 377 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tvement Capacity 298 377 obability of Queue free St. 0 . 75 0 . 78 tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 onflicting Flows 1001 822 ttential Capacity 692 807 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 692 807 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 89 0 . 93 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 2072 2075 tential Capacity 54 54 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Ip. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 83 0 . 83 vement Capacity 45 45 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 91 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 C flicting Flows 2112 tential Capacity 37 estrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 76 0 . 81 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 81 0 . 85 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 64 0 . 64 Movement Capacity 24 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1100 966 otential Capacity 288 333 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 lap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 89 ovement Capacity 269 297 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 99 0 . 96 art 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 972 1109 J otential Capacity 331 285 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 93 Movement Capacity 295 266 0 rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2072 2075 latential Capacity 54 54 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 83 0 . 83 ovement Capacity 45 45 sult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 14 1 . 73 t 136 125 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 91 ep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 1100 tential Capacity 257 309 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 89 vement Capacity 240 276 irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 1012 tential Capacity 288 247 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 67 0 . 69 vement Capacity 193 171 Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2112 tential Capacity 37 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 76 0 . 81 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 81 0 . 85 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 64 0 . 64 -1vement Capacity 24 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 88 C t 90 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 17 4 74 11 82 ovement Capacity (vph) 90 136 298 125 377 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 204 304 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches to vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Uep 90 136 298 125 377 S lume 17 4 74 11 82 Delay Sep Sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 204 304 SUM C Sep fact Irksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 It Config L L LTR TR v (vph) 54 75 95 93 (vph) 807 692 204 304 0 . 07 0 . 11 0 .47 0 . 31 9 °s queue length 0 . 21 0 . 36 2 . 24 1 . 26 C trol Delay 9. 8 10 . 8 37 .2 22 . 0 L A B E C A roach Delay 37 .2 22 . 0 Approach LOS E CLOS E C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 P ] ) 0 . 93 0 . 89 v 1) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 v 2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P oj ) 3(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 8 10 . 8 4, umber of major street through lanes I nk, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1 1 2005 Build Condition ' with Modifications * 1 1 1 1 1 ' *Note: ' 1 . 2005 Build Condition with Modifications includes seasonal adjustment factors of 33% and 47% for the weekday and Saturday, respectively, a 2.0% per year normal traffic growth rate, the expected traffic due to other planned developments, the 1 roadway improvements described in this report, the traffic generated by the proposed development, and the roadway modifications recommended in this report. 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TTS.wpd 1 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY �alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 Inalysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty Lnits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 last/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) orth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr ntersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 615 5 35 793 4 (ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 675 5 38 871 4 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR tstream Signal? No No ('nor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 8 0 19 2 11 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 20 2 12 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (°s) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No Storage Channelized? No nes 0 1 1 1 0 Configuration LT R TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LT R I TR 1 (vph) 12 38 8 20 14 m) (vph) 771 912 182 452 317 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 04 0 . 04 0 . 04 0 . 04 #t queue length 0 . 05 0 . 13 0 . 14 0 . 14 0 . 14 ntrol Delay 9 . 7 9 . 1 25 . 7 13 . 3 16 . 9 LOS A A D B C Ipproach Delay 16 . 9 16 . 9 pproach LOS C C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates 6 Main Street sthampton Beach, NY 11978 iihone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS Llyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA tto Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday AM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (7 risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 L T R L T R lume 11 615 5 35 793 4 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 Cak-15 Minute Volume 3 169 1 10 218 1 urly Flow Rate, HFR 12 675 5 38 871 4 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 L T R L T R Volume 8 0 19 2 11 lak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 0 . 91 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 0 5 1 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 8 0 20 2 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (°s) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 0 configuration LT R TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn Through irrksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles W Movement 2 Movement 5 Tared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : Opt flow rate, major rt vehicles : Fi ber of major street through lanes : Frksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6.2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 k(hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3, 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 �c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 1 'orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog tal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type rfective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) jjroportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) (q2) j(q) mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f x platooned flow, V(c,max) n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) oportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 mputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 , 000 p (dom) �(subo) nstrained or unconstrained? p oportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II 1) p (4) 7) 99)) (10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R i V c,x 875 680 1658 1653 678 1653 873 'x V c,u,x r,x plat,x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 702 956 702 951 949 704 s 1700 1700 1700 �(x) (c,u,x) C (r,x) '(plat,x) Irksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations ep 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 678 873 tential Capacity 452 349 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tvement Capacity 452 349 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 96 0 . 97 tep 2 : LT from Major St. 4 1 nflicting Flows 680 875 Potential Capacity 912 771 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 912 771 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 96 0 . 98 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 1653 1653 tential Capacity 98 98 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 vement Capacity 92 92 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 0 . 99 Up 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 inflicting Flows 1658 tential Capacity 78 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 93 0 . 94 1j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 95 0 . 96 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 91 Movement Capacity 72 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 702 949 otential Capacity 440 339 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 96 ovement Capacity 433 325 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 0 . 99 art 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 951 704 Cap tential Capacity 338 440 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 . Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 96 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 324 433 a rt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1653 1653 latential Capacity 98 98 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 94 0 . 94 tvement Capacity 92 92 sult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 55 0 . 77 t 206 204 Probability of Queue free St . 1 . 00 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 702 tential Capacity 429 315 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 96 vement Capacity 422 302 irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 956 tential Capacity 310 427 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 94 vement Capacity 285 402 rt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 1658 tential Capacity 78 1destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 93 0 . 94 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 95 0 . 96 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 92 0 . 91 11 vement Capacity 72 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 74 C t 182 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 8 0 20 2 12 ovement Capacity (vph) 182 206 452 204 349 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 182 317 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches o vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Sep 182 206 452 204 349 lume 8 0 20 2 12 Delay sep Sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 182 317 SUM C sep ' act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 the Config L L LT R TR v (vph) 12 38 8 20 14 m) (vph) 771 912 182 452 317 c 0 . 02 0 . 04 0 . 04 0 . 04 0 . 04 s queue length 0 . 05 0 . 13 0 . 14 0 . 14 0 . 14 CSoach rol Delay 9 . 7 9. 1 25 . 7 13 . 3 16 . 9 A A D B C Delay 16 . 9 16 . 9 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Coj ) 0 . 98 0 . 96 il) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 7 9. 1 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Ualyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour ntersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty 'nits : U. S . Customary nalysis Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 (tersection st/West Street : Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' L T R L T R Volume 17 1012 8 62 791 20 ircent ak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1043 8 63 815 20 Heavy vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL LChannelized? es 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Istream Signal? No No 'nor Street : Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 it 12 ' L T R L T R volume 9 9 51 2 73 Fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 9 52 2 75 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (o) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No Storage IChannelized? No nes 0 1 1 1 0 Configuration LT R TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service IA proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LT R TR i (vph) 17 63 18 52 77 m) (vph) 798 662 132 277 357 v/c 0 . 02 0 . 10 0 . 14 0 . 19 0 . 22 %- queue length 0 . 07 0 . 31 0 . 46 0 . 68 0 . 81 ntrol Delay 9 . 6 11 . 0 36 . 5 21 . 0 17 . 8 LOS A B E C C �pproach Delay 25 . 0- 17 . 8 approach LOS C C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c titer M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates Main Street sthampton Beach, NY 11978 alone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS talyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA to Performed: 1/21/04 ialysis Time Period: Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane trisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S . Customary alysis Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 I L T R L T R lume 17 1012 8 62 791 20 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ak-15 Minute Volume 4 261 2 16 204 5 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 1043 8 63 815 20 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Idian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Istream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 it 12 1 L T R L T R Volume 9 9 51 2 73 fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 0 . 97 ak-15 Minute Volume 2 2 13 1 19 urly Flow Rate, HFR 9 9 52 2 75 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (%) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage Channelized? No 1 Lanes 0 1 1 1 0 'onfiguration LT R TR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ovements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn IThrough trksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles : b tuer of major street through lanes : trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Xc,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c,g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3 , lt) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 #c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R If,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f,HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 orksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type vffective Green, g (sec) cle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P (ql) C2) ■(q) Olomputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha to avel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f tx platooned flow, V(c,max) .n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) toportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) U(subo) restrained or unconstrained? oportion locked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II IF 1) p (4) 7) 8) p (9) 10) 11) 12) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c, x 835 1051 2071 2042 1047 2036 825 'x V c, u,x r,x plat,x wo-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 1081 990 1081 961 951 1085 s 1700 1700 1700 �(x) (c,u,x) (r, x) (plat,x) 11rksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St . 9 12 nflicting Flows 1047 825 _ tential Capacity 277 372 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 vement Capacity 277 372 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 81 0 . 80 tep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 nflicting Flows 1051 835 Cdement ential Capacity 662 798 estrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Capacity 662 798 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 90 0 . 98 7 L-Shared Prob Q free St . Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 2042 2036 tential Capacity 56 57 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 89 vement Capacity so 50 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 94 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 Cestrian flicting Flows 2071 ential Capacity 40 Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 87 0 . 83 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 90 0 . 87 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 71 Movement Capacity 29 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance Step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 cart 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1081 951 otential Capacity 294 338 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 90 ovement Capacity 288 306 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 99 art 2 - Second Stage 'onflicting Flows 961 1085 iotential Capacity 335 293 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 90 0 . 98 Movement Capacity 303 287 a Wart 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2042 2036 lutential Capacity 56 57 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 89 (vement Capacity 50 50 'Result for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 01 1 . 47 t 154 140 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 94 0 . 99 ep 4 : LT from Minor St. 7 10 rt 1 - First Stage nflicting Flows 1081 itential Capacity 264 315 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1. 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 98 0 . 90 vement Capacity 258 285 irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 990 tential Capacity 297 256 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 77 vement Capacity 213 197 rt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2071 otential Capacity 40 idestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 87 0 . 83 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 90 0 . 87 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 72 0 . 71 vement Capacity 29 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 37 C t 115 ■ ■ Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R lume (vph) 9 9 52 2 75 vement Capacity (vph) 115 154 277 140 372 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 132 357 ■ ■ Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches vement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Uep 115 154 277 140 372 s lume 9 9 52 2 75 Delay sep sep +1 round (Qsep +1) max sh 132 357 SUM C sep 1 act trksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LT R TR v (vph) 17 63 18 52 77 fm) (vph) 798 662 132 277 357 C 0 . 02 0 . 10 0 . 14 0 . 19 0 . 22 95% queue length 0 . 07 0 . 31 0 .46 0 . 68 0 . 81 CSoach rol Delay 9 . 6 11 . 0 36 . 5 21 . 0 17 . 8 A B E C C Delay 25 . 0- 17 . 8 Approach LOS C C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 WoJ ) 0 . 98 0 . 90 ii) , Volume for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 i2) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 (oj ) d(M, LT) , Delay for stream 1 or 4 9 . 6 11 . 0 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c ■ TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY alyst : AY gency/Co. : DEA Date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour tersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane Jurisdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty tiits : U. S. Customary alysis Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 (st/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street: Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr tersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jor Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 51 915 17 70 754 12 Iak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 983 18 75 810 12 rcent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Median Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No nor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 16 4 69 11 77 fak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 4 74 11 82 ercent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 trcent Grade (°s) 0 0 than Storage 1 ared Approach: Exists? No Storage IChannelized? No nes 0 1 1 1 0 Configuration LT R TR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service A-proach EB WB Northbound Southbound vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ne Config L L LT R TR (vph) 54 75 21 74 93 m) (vph) 807 692 96 298 304 v/C 0 . 07 0 . 11 0 . 22 0 . 25 0 . 31 % queue length 0 . 21 0 . 36 0 . 78 0 . 96 1 . 26 ntrol Delay 9 . 8 10 . 8 52 . 7 21 . 0 22 . 0 LOS A B F C C Ipproach Delay 28 . 0 22 . 0 pproach LOS D C HCS2000 : Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 . 1c alter M. Dunn, Jr. Dunn Engineering Associates L6 Main Street esthampton Beach, NY 11978 hone: (631) 288-2480 Fax: (631) 288-2544 -Mail : TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS alyst : AY Agency/Co. : DEA date Performed: 1/21/04 alysis Time Period: Saturday Midday Peak Hour Intersection: Main Road & Marlene Lane (alysis risdiction: Town of Southold, SuffolkCounty its : U. S. Customary Year: 2005Buildw/Mod(SeasonalAdjust) Project ID: CVS Pharmacy, Mattituck 23140 . 00 st/West Street: Main Road (NYS Route 25) rth/South Street : Marlene Ln/MattituckPlzShppCtr Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0 . 25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R lume 51 915 17 70 754 12 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 14 246 5 19 203 3 urly Flow Rate, HFR 54 983 18 75 810 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- (dian Type TWLTL Channelized? nes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR stream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R volume 16 4 69 11 77 (ak Hour Factor, PHF 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 0 . 93 ak-15 Minute Volume 4 1 19 3 21 urly Flow Rate, HFR 17 4 74 11 82 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 rcent Grade (%) 0 0 dian Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 0 configuration LT R TR _Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 low (ped/hr) 0 0 0 0 ane Width (ft) 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 12 . 0 alking Speed (ft/sec) 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 4 . 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn ' Through �prksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles ■ Movement 2 Movement 5 ared In volume, major th vehicles : ared In volume, major rt vehicles : Sat flow rate, major th vehicles : t flow rate, major rt vehicles: tuber of major street through lanes: trksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation tvement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R c,base) 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 c,hv) 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1. 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 O(hv) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 t (c, g) 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 0 . 20 0 . 20 0 . 10 ade/100 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 3 , 1t) 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 t (c, T) : 1-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 2-stage 0 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 �c) 1-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 7 . 1 6 . 5 6 . 2 6 . 5 6 . 2 2-stage 4 . 1 4 . 1 6 . 1 5 . 5 6 . 2 5 . 5 6 . 2 llow-Up Time Calculations vement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R f,base) 2 . 20 2 . 20 3 . 50 4 . 00 3 . 30 4 . 00 3 . 30 t (f, HV) 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 0 . 90 HV) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 f) 2 . 2 2 . 2 3 . 5 4 . 0 3 . 3 4 . 0 3 . 3 lorksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals computation 1-Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) prog otal Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type lffective Green, g (sec) ycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from Exhibit 16-11) roportion vehicles arriving on green P �(ql) (q2) S (q) ■ mputation 2-Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) alpha eta ravel time, t (a) (sec) nothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Uplatooned flow, V(c,max) x n platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t (p) ■ proportion time blocked, p 0 . 000 0 . 000 omputation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result (2) 0 . 000 (5) 0 . 000 p (dom) (subo) restrained or unconstrained? (oportion blocked (1) (2) (3) r minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p (x) Process Stage I Stage II (1) p (4) (7) (9) 012) l0) 11) Imputation 4 and 5 ngle-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L L L T R L T R V c, x 822 1001 2112 2072 992 2075 816 ix V c, u,x r, x plat,x o-Stage Process 7 8 10 it Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 (c,x) 1100 1012 1100 972 966 1109 s 1700 1700 1700 I(x) (c,u,x) C (r,x) '(plat,x) Irksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1 : RT from Minor St. 9 12 nflicting Flows 992 816 tential Capacity 298 377 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 298 377 obability of Queue free St . 0 . 75 0 . 78 1ep 2 : LT from Major St . 4 1 nflicting Flows 1001 822 Potential Capacity 692 807 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 vement Capacity 692 807 Probability of Queue free St. 0 . 89 0 . 93 SL-Shared Prob Q free St . ep 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 nflicting Flows 2072 2075 tential Capacity 54 54 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 83 0 . 83 vement Capacity 45 45 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 91 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Inflicting Flows 2112 tential Capacity 37 destrian Impedance Factor 1. 00 1 . 00 Maj . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 76 0 . 81 1j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 81 0 . 85 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 64 0 . 64 Movement Capacity 24 1 Worksheet 7-Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance step 3 : TH from Minor St . 8 11 art 1 - First Stage onflicting Flows 1100 966 otential Capacity 288 333 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 89 ovement Capacity 269 297 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 99 0 . 96 Mart 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 972 1109 lotential Capacity 331 285 edestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 89 0 . 93 Movement Capacity 295 266 Lt 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2072 2075 ktential Capacity 54 54 destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 ap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 83 0 . 83 ovement Capacity 45 45 Wesult for 2 stage process : a 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 14 1 . 73 t 136 125 Probability of Queue free St . 0 . 97 0 . 91 ep 4 : LT from Minor St . 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage inflicting Flows 1100 tential Capacity 257 309 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 tp. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 93 0 . 89 vement Capacity 240 276 Irt 2 - Second Stage nflicting Flows 1012 tential Capacity 288 247 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 p. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 67 0 . 69 vement Capacity 193 171 Irt 3 - Single Stage nflicting Flows 2112 tential Capacity 37 1destrian Impedance Factor 1 . 00 1 . 00 j . L, Min T Impedance factor 0 . 76 0 . 81 j . L, Min T Adj . Imp Factor. 0 . 81 0 . 85 Cap. Adj . factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0 . 64 0 . 64 It vement Capacity 24 Results for Two-stage process : 0 . 91 0 . 91 1 . 88 C t 90 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations ovement 7 8 9 10 it 12 L T R L T R olume (vph) 17 4 74 11 82 ovement Capacity (vph) 90 136 298 125 377 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 96 304 Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches ovement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R sep 90 136 298 125 377 lume 17 4 74 11 82 Delay lsep sep +1 ound (Qsep +1) max sh 96 304 SUM C sep ' act Frksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Fne Config L L LT R TR v (vph) 54 75 21 74 93 (m) (vph) 807 692 96 298 304 c 0 . 07 0 . 11 0 . 22 0 . 25 0 . 31 5°s queue length 0 . 21 0 . 36 0 . 78 0 . 96 1 . 26 tntrol Delay 9 . 8 10 . 8 52 . 7 21 . 0 22 . 0 S A B F C C proach Delay 28 . 0 22 . 0 Approach LOS D C Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 Uil) , ) 0 . 93 0 . 89 ) , volume for stream 2 or 5 volume for stream 3 or 6 s (il) , Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 V( LT) , ) , Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 j ) Delay for stream 1 or 4 9. 8 10 . 8 Number of major street through lanes rank, l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 Traffic Volume 1 Counts i 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Maffiwck-23140.00 _ File:TIS.wpd 1 1 tf4Ew yopll=�•M u0PAftTMENr 4FTRM$PQRTATI0N ' 24 0.70 NASSAU CO LINE RT 110 98 15206 3.80 RT 495 CR 94A 99 10027 0.46 CR 94A CR 104 TRAFFIC CIRCLE 98 13648 1.24 CR 104 TRAFFIC CIRCLE CR 105 CROSS RIVER RD 99 14120 1.33' CR 105 CROSS RIVER RD PLEASURE DRI 99 21151'. ' 4.98 PLEASURE DR ACC RT 27 99 16641 0.24 ACC RT 27 MONTAUK HWY END 24 98 14795 25 2.35 NASSAU CO LINE WEST GATE DR RT 110 00 34409 ' 1,19:. RT 110-;r DEPOT RD/PIGEON HILL RD 00 32862 1.45 DEPOT RD/PIGEON HILL RD CR 35 PARK AVE 94 33530 1.79 CR 35 PARK AVE CR 10 ELWOOD RD 96 22763 1.12 CR 10 ELWOOD RD LARKFIELD RD 01 23138 ' 0.90 LARKFIELD RD CR 4 COMMACK RD 94 36338 0.15:. CR4COMMACKAD RT 454 VETS:MEM HGWY: 00 .' 55853: 0.48 RT 454 VETS MEM HGWY ACC SUNKEN MEADOW PKWY 94 28395 2.55 ACC SUNKEN MEADOW PKWY OLD WILLETS PATH 00 28546 1.37 OLD WILLETS PATH START 25A OLAP 99 31571 ' 0.55 START 25A OLAP RR OVERPASS 00 42224 0<80 RR OVERPASS RT111 END 25A OLAP 00 30894 1.91 RT 111 END 25A OLAP LAKE AVENUE 99 32096 0.87 LAKE AVENUE RT 347 99 24688 ' 0.88 RT 347 HALLOCK RD 01 27872 0.79 HALLOCK RD HAWKINS AVE/STONYBROOK RD 01 37031 2.16': HAWKINS':AVFJSTONYBROOK RD CIR 97 NICOLLS:'RD. .. 01 38477 2.33 CR 97 NICOLLS RD CR 83 N OCEAN AVE 00 36987 ' 1.01 CR 83 N OCEAN AVE RT 112 CORAM 01 19847 0.31 RT 112 CORAM MT SINAI-CORAM RD 01 29271 3.07 MT SINAI-CORAM RD CR 21 MIDDLE ISLAND RD ROCKY 97 26071 3.93 CR 21 MIDDLE ISLAND:-RD ROCKY I CR 46 W FLOYD PKWY. 99 15032 2.84 CR 46 W FLOYD PKWY WADING RIVER RD 99 14038 ' 2.50 WADING RIVER RD RT 25A 99 7249 2.20 RT 25A EDWARDS AVE 01 16498 1.00 EDWARDS AVE CR 58 OLD COUNTRY RD 01 13276 0.62; CR 68 OLD COUNTRY:RD RT495 L I E 98. 4463 1.68 RT 495 L I E MILL RD 01 10773 1.20 MILL RD CR 94A RIVERHEAD 01 12343 0.40 CR 94A RIVERHEAD CR 63 ROANOKE AVE 01 8294 1.70 CR 63 ROANOKE AVE CR 58 OLD COUNTRY RD 98 11295 ' 0.40 CR 58 OLD COUNTRY'RD ` CR 105 CROSS RIVER DR 98 22405 3.30 CR 105 CROSS RIVER DR SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE/MANOR 01 14471 3.80 SOUTH JAMESPORT AVE/MANOR SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK 01 15532 2.90 SOUND AVE MAIN RD MATTITUCK N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE 01 11919 4.40 N SUFFOLK AVE CUTCHOGUE TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD 00 13988 ' 5.33. TUCKER LA SOUTHOLD RT 114 01 8183 1.14 RT 114 CR 48 00 7695 5.58 CR 48 NARROW RIVER RD - 01 7453 2.67 NARROW RIVER RD ORIENT PT END 25 01 2806 25A 0.12" NASSAU CO LINE, RT108 ' - 00 23324 2.32 RT 108 LAWRENCE HILL RD 99 14686 0.44 LAWRENCE HILL RD RT 110 HUNTINGTON 98 20334 ' 0.72 RT 110 HUNTINGTON PARK AVENUE 01 23100 0.47 PARK AVENUE GREEN LAWN RD 01 19773 2.24 GREEN LAWN RD. CR:86 CENTERPORT RD/LITTLE 00 15737 2.47 CR 86 CENTERPORT RD/LITTLE VERNON VALLEY RD WATERSIDE R 01 20932 1.85 VERNON VALLEY RD WATERSIDE R CR 4 BREAD&CHEESE HOLLOW R 00 11978 ' 2.32 CR 4 BREAD&CHEESE HOLLOW R ACC SUNKEN MEADOW PKWY 01 15670 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Main Road (NYS Route 25) 1 at 1 Factory Avenue/Sigsbee Road 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 1 File:TIS.wpd 1 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES 'te Code 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None �W Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK : Friday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/12/03 ----------_-----------------------------------------------------------______________________----------------------------- me From North From East From South From West Vehicle in RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total g ___ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________--"---------_ _7 00 AM 9 0 8 1 92 4 2 0 1 0 81 9 207 115 14 1 10 3 94 1 3 1 1 1 100 4 233 130 18 0 9 3 134 3 B 2 1 1 109 9 297 7-.45 14 0 6 6 132 2 0 0 3 0 137 8 308 1 TOTAL 55 1 33 13 452 10 13 3 6 2 427 30 1045 8:00 AM 13 3 9 1 129 3 3 3 2 2 92 8 268 15 15 1 8 10 119 2 1 0 2 1 99 11 269 30 20 2 7 1 134 1 6 3 3 1 111 8 297 :45 16 0 11 5 157 1 2 4 4 0 98 6 304 HR TOTAL 64 6 35 17 539 7 12 10 11 4 400 33 1138 --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______ �Y TOTAL 119 7 68 30 991 17 25 13 17 6 827 63 2183 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR . . ...... VOLUMES .... .... . ... PERCENTS . .. FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thou Left Total Right Thru Left North 800 AM 0.91 64 6 35 105 61 6 33 East 8:00 AM 0.86 17 539 7 563 3 96 1 ' South 8:00 AM 0.69 12 10 11 33 36 30 33 West 7:45 AM 0.62 4 439 35 478 1 92 7 Entire Intersection ' North 7:30 AM 0.89 60 4 32 96 62 4 33 East 0.97 20 514 10 544 4 94 2 ' South 0.57 12 5 8 25 48 20 32 West 0.82 4 437 36 477 1 92 8 p4F =0 .�3 DNNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Its Code 23140 PAGE: 1 NS Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None leW Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK : Friday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/12/03 -----------_"_'---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_--- Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave N W-+—E S ' 61 60 4 32 111 L96 20 582 rNYSoute 25 544 514 36 L 10 437 477 NYS Route 25 481 ' 4 F 25 8 5 12 18 1 Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave 1 ISDUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 AY OF WK Thursday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/11/03 ime From North From East From South From West Vehicle coin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total 4:00 PM 24 5 29 1 148 0 6 0 2 5 168 18 406 4:15 14 1 16 9 121 3 2 1 1 1 154 16 339 4:30 10 2 10 3 143 3 2 7 1 2 141 16 340 4:45 16 3 22 2 123 4 3 0 2 5 154 15 349 tTOTAL 64 11 77 15 535 10 13 8 6 13 617 65 1434 5:00 PM 15 2 16 3 135 2 0 2 0 1 173 29 378 15 11 2 17 6 112 1 2 2 1 3 150 22 329 30 4 1 19 11 125 0 6 2 0 1 143 12 324 5:45 10 4 9 4 85 3 2 0 2 6 119 13 257 TOTAL 40 9 61 24 457 6 10 6 3 11 585 76 1288 ,AY TOTAL 104 20 138 39 992 16 23 14 9 24 1202 141 2722 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR . . ..... . VOLUMES . . ...... .... PERCENTS . . . FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Then Left Total Right Thru Left _North------- __ _ _______ -------------- ---- ---- ----- -__------------ -_----- _---- 51 9:00 PM 0.66 64 11 ]] 152 42 7 51 East 4:00 PM 0.94 15 535 30 560 3 96 2 South 4:00 PM 0.68 13 8 6 27 48 30 22 West 4:30 PM O.BB 11 618 82 711 2 87 12 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.66 64 11 ]] 152 42 7 51 East 0.94 15 535 10 560 3 96 2 South 0.68 13 8 6 27 48 30 22 West 0.91 13 617 65 695 2 89 9 pµF -- 0,9T I DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 tA-S Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WE : Thursday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/11/03 ----------___----__ ---------------------------------------------------------------------_------- _-------------------_""_--- Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave N W+E S ' 88 64 11 I77 iL 152 J 15 605 rNYSoute 25 560 535 i 65 L 10 617 695 NYS Route 25 i 707 13 F 27 -7 i 6 8 13 34 ---------------- Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave i DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES ite Code 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 AY OF WK : Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/20/03 ---------- -- -------------------------------------------------------------"_"__--.-___-----------_-__---________-__________" t'me From North From East From South From West Vehicle gin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total --------_--------------------------___________________________________________-------------------------------------------------- 1 00 _________________________________________________1:00 AM 20 2 15 5 127 2 3 2 2 1 136 11 326 i1:15 19 3 12 B 102 4 5 4 4 1 131 11 304 1:30 16 4 20 4 131 2 4 4 1 1 110 16 313 11:45 22 1 25 8 137 7 6 4 0 1 139 24 374 1 TOTAL 77 10 72 25 497 15 18 14 7 4 516 62 1317 12.00 PM 27 6 26 5 137 2 5 1 4 1 157 19 390 � 15 20 4 20 6 122 7 4 2 4 0 115 17 321 :30 13 4 17 6 132 4 3 1 1 2 127 15 325 12:45 25 1 23 9 113 2 1 6 1 0 143 11 335 HR TOTAL 85 15 86 26 504 15 13 10 10 3 542 62 1371 1:00 PM 22 2 19 9 141 4 2 6 2 4 130 11 360 1:15 20 4 24 6 144 1 1 2 4 0 117 11 334 30 18 2 29 6 117 3 3 1 1 2 121 23 326 45 13 2 29 5 149 4 2 1 3 2 137 11 358 HR TOTAL 73 10 101 26 551 12 8 10 10 8 513 56 1370 -------- _ _-----------___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ �Y TOTAL 235 35 259 77 1552 42 39 34 27 15 1571 180 4066 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 11:00 AM - 2:00 PM ' DIRECTION START PEAK HR ... ..... VOLUMES . . . . . . . . .... PERCENTS . . . FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left _______________________________________________________________________________________________ North 11:30 AM 0.81 85 15 91 191 45 8 48 East 1:00 PM 0.93 26 551 12 589 4 94 2 South 11:15 AM 0.81 20 13 9 42 48 31 21 ' West 11:45 AM 0.87 4 538 75 617 1 87 12 Entire Intersection North 11:45 AM 0.78 82 15 88 185 44 B 40 East 0.94 25 528 20 573 4 92 3 South 0.88 18 8 9 35 51 23 26 ' West 0.87 4 538 75 617 1 87 12 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Cc Code 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave FILE: None tAW Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK : Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/20/03 --- _ _ __--------___________-----------___________________________________________---------------- _----------_-----___ Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 11:45 AM - 12:45 PM Sigsbee Road/Factory Ave N W+E S 108 82 15 I88 ' il L185 J 25 619 NYS Route 25 573 528 75 L 20 ' 538 617 NYS Route 25 644 4 F 35 -7 ' 9 8 18 FS19Sbee Road/Factory Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Main Road (NYS Route 25) 1 at 1 Marlene Lane/Mattituck Plaza 1 Shopping Center Access Driveway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 1 File:TIS.wpd 1 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 N Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None tAW Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK : Tuesday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/16/03 -----______ __-------------------------------------------_--------------------------------------------------_--------- ______ time From North From East From South From West Vehicle egin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total --------------------------------------------- 7:00 AM 2 0 0 3 116 2 2 0 0 1 106 2 234 17:15 2 1 0 0 124 1 1 0 1 0 138 0 268 7:30 0 0 0 1 130 2 4 0 1 1 121 1 261 7:45 4 0 0 1 135 4 7 0 1 0 109 2 263 1 TOTAL 8 1 0 5 505 9 14 0 3 2 474 5 1026 8:00 AM 3 0 0 1 123 5 4 0 2 0 117 4 259 � 15 2 0 0 0 153 3 3 0 0 1 93 0 255 :30 1 0 0 1 145 5 0 0 2 3 105 1 263 8:45 2 1 0 1 151 3 3 0 2 0 127 3 293 tTOTAL 8 1 0 3 572 16 10 0 6 4 442 8 1070 ----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- -.-------------------.----------- ---------------- -___ - �Y TOTAL 16 2 0 8 1077 25 24 0 9 6 916 13 2096 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ... . . . . . VOLUMES . . . ..... . . . . PERCENTS . . . FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left -North-------7:15-AM 0.639----- 10109010----- 0__ East 8:00 AM 0.95 3 572 16 591 1 97 3 ' South 7:30 AM 0.69 18 0 4 22 82 0 18 West 7:15 AM 0.89 1 485 7 493 0 98 1 Entire Intersection North 8:00 AM 0.75 8 1 0 9 89 11 0 East 0.95 3 572 16 591 1 97 3 ' South 0.67 10 0 6 16 62 0 38 West 0.87 4 442 8 454 1 97 2 1 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES lite Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 AY OF WK : Tuesday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/16/03 ___________ ----------------------_-----------------------------------------------------------------_---------__.... ___-______ Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Marlene Lane N ' W+E S 11 8 1 0 ' L 9 3 586 ' NYS Route 25 591 572 ' 8 L 16 ' 442 454 NYS Route 25 452 ' 4 F 16 - ' 6 0 10 FMarlene Lane 1 I DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 S Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None -W Street: NYS Route 25 AY OF WK : Tuesday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/16/03 -.---------____ _-------------------------------------------_---------_ -----------------------------------_-____-_----- . ..-__--_ me From North From East From South From West Vehicle gin RT TURD LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total -----------__ _-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------__----_------- 1 00 ______100 PM 13 1 0 1 130 6 12 3 2 152 7 325 115 13 1 0 6 140 7 10 0 2 2 169 3 353 4:30 11 0 0 3 141 6 5 1 3 4 197 0 371 4:45 16 0 0 2 149 11 8 2 0 0 168 3 359 1 TOTAL 53 2 0 12 560 30 31 5 8 8 686 13 1408 5:00 PM 13 0 0 3 140 7 6 3 2 0 193 6 373 15 12 0 0 3 120 4 6 0 2 5 188 1 341 :30 13 0 0 0 126 7 3 0 2 3 175 7 336 5:45 6 1 0 0 116 1 2 2 2 1 163 3 297 1 TOTAL 44 1 0 6 502 19 17 5 8 9 719 17 1347 _---____--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------______________________________ hY TOTAL 97 3 0 18 1062 49 48 10 16 17 1405 30 2755 ' PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ... . . .. . VOLUMES . ....... . ... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.86 53 2 0 55 96 4 0 East 4:15 PM 0.95 14 570 31 615 2 93 5 ' South 4:00 PM 0.85 31 5 8 44 70 11 18 West 4:30 PM 0.95 9 746 10 765 1 98 1 Entire Intersection North 4:15 PM 0.84 53 1 0 54 98 2 0 East 0.95 14 570 31 615 2 93 5 1 South 0.88 29 6 7 42 69 14 17 West 0.93 6 727 12 745 1 98 2 1 1 1 1 DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES Site Code : 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None tAW Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK Tuesday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/16/03 -------__------------_--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..-----------__------ Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM Marlene Lane N W+E S ' 32 53 1 I0 "Rout54 J 14 e F 615 570 12 L 31 1 ' 727 745 NYS Route 25 756 ' 6 � 42 ' 7 6 29 FMarlene Lane DUNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES lite Code 23140 PAGE: 1 NS Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK : Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/20/03 _------------__----_------------------------------------------__----------------------------------------------_----__----___ c From North From East From South From West Vehicle gin RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT RT THRU LT Total 00 AM 7 2 1 3 131 11 5 1 2 5 141 7 316 1:15 9 2 0 4 105 9 11 1 2 2 139 3 287 .1:30 10 0 0 4 130 8 8 0 1 1 132 4 298 11:45 16 2 0 1 135 12 10 0 I 4 154 6 341 1 TOTAL 42 6 1 12 501 40 34 2 6 12 566 20 1242 12:00 PM 10 2 1 2 123 10 6 1 3 4 169 6 337 15 15 0 0 1 108 2 12 0 2 1 139 16 296 30 9 3 0 4 126 6 9 1 4 2 131 5 300 :45 12 0 1 2 112 9 6 0 2 6 159 3 312 HR TOTAL 46 5 2 9 469 27 33 2 11 13 598 30 1245 1:00 PM 8 1 0 0 126 3 9 1 2 4 150 1 305 1:15 8 2 0 0 128 8 3 0 3 2 136 1 291 30 15 1 0 5 112 8 3 0 0 3 145 4 296 :45 11 1 0 4 138 3 9 0 2 7 150 4 329 HR TOTAL 42 5 0 9 504 22 24 1 7 16 581 10 1221 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ �Y TOTAL 130 16 3 30 1474 89 91 5 24 41 1745 60 3708 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 11:00 AM - 2:00 PM ' DIRECTION START PEAK HR ...... . . VOLUMES ... ..... .... PERCENTS . . . FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Th. Left Total Right Thru Left _______________________________________________________________________________________________ North 11:45 AM 0.81 50 7 1 58 86 12 2 East 11:00 AM 0.93 12 501 40 553 2 91 7 South 11:45 AM 0.88 37 2 10 49 76 4 20 ' West 12:00 PM 0.90 13 598 30 641 2 93 5 Entire Intersection ' North 11:45 AM 0.81 50 7 1 58 86 12 2 East 0.90 8 492 30 530 2 93 6 South 0.88 37 2 10 49 76 4 20 ' West 0.89 11 593 33 637 2 93 5 DDNN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES its Code 23140 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Marlene Lane FILE: None W Street: NYS Route 25 Y OF WK Saturday Movements by: Primary DATE: 12/20/03 _____________________________________________________________________________________ ______________ Total Turning Volumes for the Period: 11:45 AM - 12:95 PM Marlene Lane N ' W---E S ' 43 50 7 1 "Rout58 � 8 e 530 492 ' 33 L 30 ' 593 637 NYS Route 25 631 ' 11 F 49 ' 10 2 37 48 Marlene Lane 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Accident Records 1 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Phat cy,Mattiituck-23140.00 1 File:TIS.Wpd 1 m N ry N m O �p a N b m r O_ 01 N N N O r m W O W b m yy zg 0 g G H O S k ry 0 3 S O y N 7 7+ O N •� t z Y r UO u "OL, Z 2 " z Z 02i OZ•' 02 2; i m H a o v v o wv a Ho i m ti u w w v ° v Q A W ,lroj N 7 0 Q a 0 L H H N m N 0 ' W ro N 0 H C H H m Q W .Ni CN. H G H i-] O W N N H N N H v 0 7 z L ' o N t, O N El a w 4 H 10 zip 4 z ayw o u° ,°y' o � o oN o u u° v off o off o W u U O U 0 H U u 0 U O W U U 4. Q .0 U L U yvi U z rn ro N ro m �a N ro m ro N CD •• .. Z u 0 W fy/1 vy1 •• E u l � y W N N N 00 0 w aOm �^+ 0A a 0 ° z H 00 a 0 0 0 U3: oH aG N N °u -° o y$v N z v.. w m m N r +=' C .i C c7 Q C N Q gg zz gg F+ .� N m v H4 z v H S S 3 U U W Ery O ZSSOw E E O zO m ^�O x N O sWH� m O m m O Cd Q ¢ o # UElb N y N U E y y o,Q m 0 N mQ 0 m m 0 Ci N H v4 bW N b HW N N v N E Z O W H v 3 v Q 3 v Q o `� 3 v A 3 v 0 �+ V. HO OW m v ° m vQv 4 Hoaro^ vQv aHiQv .ti 5 m c o x a a y o „ o -�°i r a m o m o w x H H vm b m H N x w °i w w o H m a wEl El a iy7 Q N W 0 E O a p a A 0 O a a H v P4 a El F Q7. El H v 0 H W r� r�� w ' U a W v o a W HE, Elg 3 aE Idg o a W H M' S E W ti N a s 0 ° O ' wa✓Guv� HrN.wi paNv, HNN .yu°dowu u� 'b�. w w " u aw�' „H .au, aroH El O CO mroaww a uH >HO pogg EC z 'o u 0 aUu Q O N ° -H ro .. 0 ; W rd q 0 HC F 0 C H H u H ro F 0 0 C O0 O v u GNoH ° ou 0ru 0 u uwaH u w w 0 .ui ° Q° w .u, U ° 4 w °vC W7' �l aaQQV AvH �U 4Nro \Uaa2Ai00q O 0O 1O •a°U4W O aO 0OL U Na \wQQ O° 0 0 � y 0 UGyCHam. QubO N W o 0 U O U z 0 'm Q0 ° W a E EEw R O 22HroPa i a Q u z A w Q �4 N � o u # O ypH .1 C # P h aO # Q 1 m m N a N N ri O H N r � k H m b o > N p N O gg gg m S S o u ro y O O 1 U U z C7 y 000 Id a N p m w a a w b m o m m o H > N H y N M N H C C m v 0 a w y° a zId O W L H W w H o H U ti O V O O U O U Y t� u Cu r bt -UH H tti N m b u1 r.2. O m m a � m y ro ri m w H w 0 0 11 �!O C C 00 O N U U U W F x o O m O ° z w °z 01 Q r Q O k U N L m w roroN �+ N C y� '0 Q O H u a a Q .i N 7 w U 0.' N O mO U rn w 0 a Qi U w Q H H w ' P4 0 U a H o z qW m H W N HLQLQ�� 3 H El El W H H O R C O 0 U a w W O ° z ,z, . o a Gz � ° vu C r m H w ..i O U N m ' vNi v m o ti U '� C F O O pi wp C E O O w m U 0 54 Pi w H u X p,w V U a £ H U m N u y o u ro u 7 o u ro <U w w w W u CF�C W W u C Q ° 7 w O o .O v '( 0 0 ro yi m m v O v UJ O U W .0 ry off b v G N U \ O m 4 N ° N m m U � moo EN ma EN ma n x u w a H £ x a u z Q a s z' Q a N O £ O � N N W N C4 m u . z �0 k FjC N l0 N 0_ N � N M N ri � H W b o � N N w d 'a Q ' O u 2 X0 0 00 900 m aIr 110 100 0roro H .1 p, N '.O� 7 1 L Q X ' Hz N H 7 N H v H H 7 a O '�' N N H m W H Np N H m 2 J W OI O a ' o m 'O N iOi b a ✓ LV? a'� NO N 'N z x w H U N O U O O U 0 O U O W O 10 W U W � ,LC U y U y0i U yvi U a+ W O1 _ tp W p fn p U1 0 S S C + M 0 H 0 W W OO, zO zO G CJ N `FJ O H 0 , W O P D US > 0 O O N N y y a 0 F HH' gO g3Q o gO tp m rn a m vA S wA S wA ar+ &d c ry N U ro 0 H w H N O N lv W U 0 U Id 0 Q W a+ C] a u Q N 0 H W N O tll O O o •�, w .� a of w ai a b r dU 2 O W W H W W H w OE A A 0 E w w w '� z U cu W W El 9H ' z C 0u rd 3 W M uro oa z H H z F Q E+ E W S F W S E S fX 00 0 2 Q a Q w x Fj U O ti .moi W ° O X H H E H E x az ,, .pro .. � � W .. N > A o -.Ni O u pp ro rd yNj Ski G N N 14 0 S4 !4 G t4 0 El 0 v W x Orw O L p E 0 E 0 0 o Eu uQ m y H V O u w H a0 u m H 7 0 o m a r wo FC O u g a W U G a w W u C w 0 0 ✓ 7 w O o ro z� Q o 'tl „ zogo o •O „ b v 0 N m 0 0 u N 0 rd ,'� O U SUi m `V o o \ 7 ti svi a �a 7 -.�4 i, a d z N svi a r• x Eq El 2: C •� Z [] w2 U Z arl u ZO arl N ✓ k 0 y a° k � a m � M m lU ✓ N z N 7 N C rt E r�i r`y�i ti U U M H ] a a A ' G E u H C H H C O 2 N m .N W ..0 G E N.0 7 v ? O iUiN U O U O ° U O q O p 0) ro r i M o HA w W P 7 F La CO(0 W O g O ✓✓ C P w Q w u a W O O O w Q u a � W N 0 vi Q u w 0 C a y O E F Oz p m O m U U tA^tl x x 0 m Hmo a Como E u O1 O! ' U rn v ca N W W N H A N O Q '� fH/1 a° H a0 i TJ 'y q N O N O 2 U y .D H W bi a tm w W Q N U O G a a .Oi a „ L] H O z �rA O W WW W q Ol O A W � Hgg [2Wr RC M tiEr6 O m O x Fyy a O „ Oa z g�, o o a N H m 0 U O -.+ N .+ .U-1 r1 E z a Ca ,, .,pro ° . � °8a mea o C m w r H O v m 0 .. m m 03 .. m m z ' vNi v m N O O GL q E o o uNi m L H LL N ro ro x O 0 b .N w b -H L H N aw m ro � a�+ uu wu ,Oj a O a w w w wu C a W W u C m ou ° a w � O O ro u � O O .d „ O .� u u Q M w O Q7 .„ U C ' O C C c N o b v C ro o v a u > o o a w m 10 .. KC �° EaazA waz4 a4 4c N O N O � W N o + . m 'N N m m M m m O m N N N N o > y O W z0 OW 0 0 o N E yy xg r! 0 0O gO ' 0 z E P Z Z P Z z m 2 P Z Z P z z V m CCO 'O'd C 'O'O U .. . -. ww W7 000 0 00w O 4 4a mmo mm PW Nw0wH ; m a OZ N O� H 0 c z T 'C O W 01 Om bl0m ti oEo a mm a mm d o x" mma a" mma z w ."y Z o O v O V o 0 U O OW O u 0 O U O a Huj W W e W 0 v 0 0 .0 U N UI N fn T CD m E U a m z m m z y a m m m O m 0 F N N O H Oro ;? O. H O W O O U 3 w .. 3 . u ° a .,°i m o u w .,°i v v q u w w m m �1 Cc) �i fir+ SJ .Ni X E fE[ 3 S k X E \ 20 y0 yO X �4 O m O ,'G 'y'y m zz N z y 7 a U tli m z a a V� z a U /2 N C m 01 UI JJ y W 9 a m bl X23 R N v o HP W H H H W a m WH N W H H a v O v H Gl w 7 U 0 H al v H C] w v y 0 o U O 0.' W U W O C a W U W U Q m rS N OE H z m ti m a O .r °j N zw E a w o wv z L � A xV W H a W m [[w.. a z H w 2 0 3z� 3 a a a ' z W ,O E4 Z F4 EAzZ0 O E z EomoHC 0[OWBJ' O Z"W 00 O W ' C Z °o X a O z 3UNb U . 0 Ca ° m p ; ; � Nm mc >. N N •. 0 N ymouO O m W V , WG N O WHqHO m ti U yyaN W q F O O W C F O O m 'U rl m Id 'H L P. m H L ro m V r m 'J N H L fU N L m ro -N O W \ aw w U aW L u Q' m -.i O W \ rti. aW L U aW L U u w E U u u v u a o 0 m u a o 0 m g ti U U 10 u a o u m u a o u m 0 o au u m v NU Ft w .-. 0 aw au u m v Hu aw .iu ao. O RCww a W UC oN O H 0 0 yy rswO O w wa W 0U0C O C zza 0u.0cr 'O U CO H uC w .. C a 0 Uv 0 H m O u v U v W 0 H m uW z O U 4 H zz O U Q IN -0 W zz O U c( H , O U 9u wH, pv -H u b z u {1 'du W H CI a 0.' E H W a N u O.2 Itu W E H W a 0.' E H W a .� o u >. ro o o RC a'H H a RC a H H a a U >.CO o 0 .0 a-H H a FC a N H a t� x H S FC F E LY a u z A a rs U z A W Q W E £ w a U z Q a rl u z A W a O N W N a W W N W W > .'1 O + P U [K RC q m N H r a m o N r e O m N N N Q m ° .. ° S oo w E O O w E O O C w 7 ' u z °a� a, 2 a, x °�, u z H pz. z00Y �a, z °�, .�' w w H Croro w Q � � > 0� m > aw -°00 > ° y > rl ❑ a H v w H W N y 0 ro w 0 Q a wm 0 iy m 0 [i �yy JJ H C. yMj H �. C"i W H r N H 7 m O W y [ H w [ H O W w w H w w H H [i ..i G 0.H 7 .� y H E y 7 m O 7 2 C 0 a row aro `° ro 0 a al fw a i L4 0 0 wu r+ ww r+ z C r U 0 U 0 0 0 V 0 0 W O N O w° u H 0 mau o 0 w a x u u .Oi u art x o o •• •• m u .7 uUi gg Ul .. 0 U .a M ro N u00'y w W a O U m 0 r 0 11 00 0ZZ U3W O gw Q Ar N ri v N w N S S ti ~ W F E o > uoi zOz W F x r O m zOz 0 0 X H r m O Za N .Ti z Cd F/1l O # u N U v Q U w r1 U El y W L 0 01, 0 N z N o S v 3 W A ri aaM 3 W Q 3 N O > O .] w W W w a H 0a Ul Q y Q L W L 4L ° 7 a U W 0 U 04 0 O ywi L 3 0 w 0 a H x a w O w O W £ H x 0 .� O V b r H o a z o a a ,q� c a m a a H x F rq�7 7 w N O r - W 7Ix Z ❑R❑ a aw u w as aw a E � QQEl W a a maw ' F z U' H .7i a F ° F H a E N O ro E o x w m X W 2 H U a H y R N U' £ 3 C7 a o .z r.0 CES. O 0 ElX W W Q W>a Q W [pHX� a H [x-� a O ro 0 E a w aF' w E W eE i a' .H-1 �+ z uHi -moi N a a 0 m a O "'w H �wa a ,, i q>'• �a.-l. u>? yapaU° z0 G w pxW N 3 H P4 0 U 0 .ti Og s .. 'd o 0°. .. ro 0 N � a g N O U w N C N U N C N H g H 0 U w ro .. ' L .m+ U a C F 0 0 a C E 0 0 w w W ,may U a G E 0 0 a C E C N ro a o -H 0 v � E 0[ -n w M .H a w _ro o v a ro -H w o 0 U c £ N U ° N 0 u 7 O u m U O u p N U U N W U a 0 U N U y O ,�, u a° out o a w °oa '� w a ue `� w ° � ww a a u7 '� w a ua Rw O O [ w N 471 0 'y\'y o o .� C \ 0 O ro G 0 Fui w 0 7 W \ 0 o ro „ 7\ D o v ., ro w 0 0 ij W L u Ul W U u v N O N w 0 W U U C 4C SOi N F roO F N U O ro �i N O W 4i N oro v a ra O N �i N > 0 N pa, w 0 0 E N Ol W 0.' E N v �y F U p, C w U a E H W W qqyy E N ro n x SKF£ a .] z w4 U z aQ QFC FT£ a .0] O2Q as U z0 wq N m m m £ m m W a m 0 w G A O Y O , > N .1 > C 0 * cwn m o N w d N ry 0 N c7 O1 m _ m m ro m > gg gg ° > G � ° S 3 HO y g oo .H m 0 O O y E O O ' z u° V za. 2 �a, °�j0 � z x 0ry0 r��+ o ° m H 0 (7 ✓ z ^.1 v 2 Fro ro Fro ro ] a Q ° a > ° a > N o H 7 v o v w n L w ' C] w w w 0 ; m 0 A a b m o ro m 0 f4 H > �W. F Ez' u C W F F L �..' H H > u W H H F H O W -.a C ~' ti F w w H -Wi EO N.0 y F y E, Ot a o W w v.rO w 7 z a � w '^ z c z O W L ti W L W L u CD 00 01 w m N � � � M w H O w W Oo, Oyy -'V 00 a Z �+ O W °U � .FryLOU O g4 0a > C UF y`^w w °7 o o ". wzgP N Rr O N m v N f9 2 w N � g L 3S U ti W E N H z j E O o p n N z ry a 2 a' H2 ron rte! Z vmi m 2co J24 N W bt b 01 b C N4 q m A Q m r�N O O N r o Q 3 A g w w m w E '� w E ✓ z acw+ a0 .. U U b > >. ro > >. o W U 3 nw F a O H L QH UN ; o Q NO HO w0Q) 0 w 7 ° (0. LAN U [L 0 b W O 01 W H x n N w H N N U o z C a N a .0 x a -.°i m0 a U V1 Q O w H ~ H H ° � i-1 ry H O N H N 04 7 a 7 x N0 N u a E < U HC01 W E+ a w ma w N EEOCOO [-4 03 E O W Oz Ew O E w E 9 Wa O H r1 + a z a H Wz 0 EH0E2 4a z p CH�W z .F� 0u°l wto 2z O O V Iro . owoO ° amoo > wtiUU N m a H 0 O o p G H 0 0 H 0 O U \ O W w H -, uU PO° H U °uQ u � U u O N F r u4 u O O o o u o C 0 v p vo O 0 N ° v o ° wz ° o u Q ti >O bv C 'o � i E p m ro uE v a a u o 'yzXai S .. � � EEaa UZA a4 UZA a4 � £ a° a2 'p a4 U2A a4 4 F C o 7 A u a N > > m > > r°4 2 N W v m v o N b 0_ b N � � b m) M N O O C N O O W O W O , �yz O , x gg gg ,m •� G NO8 rv0 a 3 gk ' N U U 2 �.+ 2i �.+ �i U z 0 NZi '.l 'Zi 'may croro N W O v v 0 0 w (w 0 0 w 0 ro 0 N N U 0 N a W 'H 7 7 0 7 > a W ' ��• H L H [ � H O '' IU �.(�{ ° N 7 m a ' W -.1 C H a O W N N H N N H m "Ti 1) El O1 O N 0, O N a' H .H O ..i 0 F r b O 0.W' L 0 W.r 0 U ..i F '� 0 0 0 F W C z. b a N W m C z w LO W a tp 0 w w W ti w r U 0 ° u 00 ° u O H U H 0 u 0 ° u 0° v v c u ti o N � z W •• .. CN U m F a y W E+ u 4 � m m m ro w 03 w 0 K % H U3 C O d u w u L W n ° C m a d m �rzt a Q N m W z g N i H F 3 i S a� g y .0 U at •� W U' y� �yOj Oy w F x o gS wq � Nz m w G IFIL 4 M .Lc mm > W Ola N Ola N W bla N pia N OL1 N a N 0 }4 0 'v m b bl N y E .N y p 1 , Z. a o W U 3 ; f] 3 ; 1 N N O p N N O a m m m W N W N W O O gg Q o .Ci N E; w E O O O L N y N y 2 :.i a C ro ro > ° > a q a M. L . 4 .7 O m N 'rW H C m 2 aHi w 01 y ti C H WWjy H H 'dU w W W4 O z W w -0 m O 0 Wi 0 ♦+ Uwl w Q •C O u W O W u 0 Q m E. d 0 w i W m O H V a m m w v 00 v 0 S H o Q aQi Q 0, a o �a a • O H u N O U 3 0H 0 o V U N H K H x W O OUg w U1 N m W V H y� w O O y' 'ZiJ N �lr W p Q o t 0 0 H O O N Q o Q N m E 3 m m �y N N N U N y ro N N w r'.i o N O w .w] N w Q w Q w M w 7 a H P4 04 o a d C A Q A m N w W 4 N O G O .w] 0 . 0 W ' UC4 a 0 oEl a w da o X w O .O-� i� m Cx'J Q El ' W a xwaGu w wl H2 3 H � N H z C m z O P4 NG T m N N N N H U 'H roH m P' C E+ O O W q H O O ,° x'xb oryN.. WWpO �° aO•N• u wwN w w] w aU 0CW aNwba 0 o , N Ov 0 0 0 O O 'tl0 Cv rougwCHOcvO o'a 002 u 0� 30a w7rm P . El a iC N W N N Wo 0 N g W ry > W t 4 t U M N • rn ^� n m m m .. N o ; �; W 0 ? N O H w H W a o i m 7 N y q g a u° uz � w zs°z. °z uz a 'za, zH °z, Z m a O w w O w 0 C b b a o 0 w Q Q H y m ti u 0 r>I W y N r>i ',[\H�J -.i •> > El • W N H > I! H > w }roj H > [y N H > O z b O m b o w W o 0 m ° N U '..' m cz amW arom •° z w ., W ° v � ° m W w W W U U N O N O phi o V v o ti O .0 u 0 O W V .0 iUi W U .00 H a ti G W RC W bl -.Ui L W y W fA 80 M H ro 0 \ N w 00 y>> O z N' M N N ON W w .Oi Q N N o a o a H O y yy U C b 0 W C N a 0 Q W b H U3; C % % �-' U 3 w Q u O -.°i L UJ m WO U a v L W W N W W C W UN > O �i 0 Cl m v F S 3 L H FaC W W UU c�Ad H W m O .n O % H m m C 0 e w m m W X o x O H O O A y n m n z Z m n z 1 a w > N m n > N C 0 F4 Ol x Q tp C N .�C °i T .LG tp �+. N 0 a o w ° w v ° 0 o a w v ° O a 7 a U w i a W a 0 � u w £ .� w W a N Q W F W 0 W E F U KK ' V a F o z W a z AHC H x" °ti' Qm �a Q O F F Qa F NaV w w a o aH o °2 wa a w z Q w �iNao 0 2 w Hoz W u .2i O H 3 H F E' x a .. .,� .. 3 x 3 H aH W O V ° .{ r-1 v w `Ti v U' z H C m 0 a L N C >� N N N N > y m O H N C >. > ~ > C7 N H y y rl U A H UC a o0 FO N .•-'i C e F OC x0Sai Ub FN tiO 01 Ha m u O v ro U roU W0 0 u 0 7 0 U v m Q °i a u C a a u C w on o U Q w w a a w b o7 Qu0O aaH RwaC U za -0, a1Qu 0 40 uu.�i Cva 1a w0 0o 0 q UW O v o 'uO Cvb o 0 0U k � 0aa Um o %E' QEw u zz a � u z as in o E m O L O > w O > > 7 ; z z 1 a N m 'ry m H CL � m ro m D m D O w m O 0 E r� rs p El 000 �i ry�0 ' N U V 2 V H 00 z z M J z .ry v r A o w v o w v a O m w Cro 0 0 10 >0 W p m 0 q m 0 C] a m N m 0 O m U M O m C z m a p w ro t a W W a w fm 0 N m °U 0 °U 0 u ti O ti O ou o mU E a� Clo op a.. .. ro\ W zz W Z N zea a m y ++ N v v k S v ro g 0, W zO zO .i °y W zg zO W 'd 6 H U3 w 0 a 0 v v r yy ¢ N N N Z o N F z $ H k VU cAtl `i W � y •� o H r+ 0 0 � �u o 0 � npi o m 0 �4 v`ii r O u pi'Q N 0 Ci n bi N ." m E .H m E .. .� m E -� m E z14 W o 3 v O 3 w A N Q 3 W 0 3 N A "Cl td N ro .•Ui U m 11 L N N J� ro ..i U m .l L m L r" f. O 1pw 0 W ti N C H a m O N H N 0� W U O am U m F a U a U O y U z C a 0 .r x -.i C a 0 n m p x A H A.i m F a p a z �! W E ' UFO KC WOUz rro aCgQ7 ia w SH [WF� Ey WE W[Ev b HE O F OH3 VEzc❑ti W W FHEl prWaW E 0 7 p oz O W G O WHN 0 ] U w ' a V P4 10 v ry, v w N o u 0 H u y v c0� 0 N m a C .i O U N m m N .. m N H }' ti 0 U m Z .. N .i U -.� C N +� H C H H •• C .v U -H C H rJ H H b 0 m w roF O L wb NE a m 'oH m p' roE 0 O pp CF U O ro U 0 0 i U X aw w U m u u v b ami U 0 0 aw 0 o a V U w w w H U ° r1° W r 0 ° �° [.�. U u w w a '..' U ° 4 w 'U+ U ° q W a O O " a ° 7 w ' 0 .0 L \ O O roar oo +i � O p w \ 0 O '° a, \ O 0 _ N 0 0 H m 0 '� u C Z O C C w H 0 O D O O U W w L 4 U W o, " a � � moo \ es"� ww \ EN � N Aromvrd P4rH m ° wam x wQE � a .1 wNa z 'o a s a �° E x° a° a �s w Q c� z4 H m rl N m rl N N W m 1l i a a a 1 N w 0_ y ri o y, 0 m N 1(1 N y r my m .0 N d � > m w w H w m > z y 0 7+ zZ ❑ 0 uz CHx'! 5Z .7k300 V z ] z z bz z ' `" a ❑ ti ro G roti a by a a °w � a > � � > Q "aw> � � >w Q °W L m ti u m rl W U m.-1 U mrl w 'dm 0 id 0 a w ro m 0 ro m 0 GmN m H> (. m H wm .Hu(,�,' Hma> Lr O zwH -H -H O H H pO 0 m 0 -H m M v -H -H a w u aEl . z w w 0 W mm 0.' romb b 'H [� O wu H wu .H C z, o H u y 0 -H 0 0-H O O v 0 U O 0 U o L A' " u U m u .c° v u .c° u >� u v .C° v .c° w a 2 .c >' w u w u w ,.+ ° i u w u y o .0 >' ro y ro m z 0 Oi u u w >, o N y yu a y w h oz u. 4 a"o y m ga ooa a �E z P4 'O ¢ H u3 W p % ''W H 0 3 W 0 ] U .H v w W W O K % U o .H 2 „ y w o a H m m O u ,w c7 u z u O a+ H C ,p zg u .�Q". .� '� w H 3 g wv ro S 3 y ~ Q �y0., `m�' ♦t E x .. wO E w W C a t in ' O9 � 00 F� 0 u zgP A G T v biR N bfa N m `H'.' ++ mm ,; mm O N < 41 .� m ro m Q N rd Fi a N �N O ✓.+ is '' a ro ti u v3 > ❑ (� it o a '�° y ° v 4 v ° y N o w H N v N a m o 3 m o y a H w° w .H m u o o O m -0 m v m O w a Q H w a '� a Q v A m Oz c a x ti s w rq� u c °i rn qq d N H aA W a N [o" w m ri W W F a w H W E E F w E a E 0 �-1 U m H o "• z >� z H H y m z 0 F z H a H [qar El o �¢N. x z w x W El v Q w w Q E F El wW El rm z v " S w El m z r. W f'i x W o {i L w 7i �..1 H 3., ppH 14 O (I 'Y' OIx E, 0 .N Z '.�, H0 0 ' W H G a u H ',HO 0 .� w 0 w ,H w O z m u 0 C m mau m CO U > .. > .. C z ...Hb U .. > .. .. > .. m N .. m m N .. m O� m H U m C >� w IU m m ro m 0 N 0 H C H N H C-H o u L H C N u H C H u H w m •U H m a C E+ 0 0 a s E+ p 0 m w m w .� u -H a C Fl 0 0 a C F+ O 0 ' ro .H L p ro .,� 1 a m ro r m Q ro �H 1J N �H al V C a .roH -U U 0 V 0,w L u x 0,W U U ro 'H 0 w x 0.0 W L u W W V u 0 o E U U ro w H U 0 u m U a 0 u .y c H U V U •O U a U ro U a 0 U ro a a a W w a a w H u a' w O 'Fal' u u ro w H u Rfi w H u a w 0 0 H w 0 a a u C O rC w W a a u r m U C 0 ou a w 'OU Qw WzON F w FO OH aH' RuC W L0 p H �'y 0U0 Uu C H 'Uuu uwCON u a H 00 w > O U 14 ? O u 4 Hp uA 0 Id O pp, ap£ Oa E0au A�. a2A w zcl w q O L O > > 0.' N > > Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Public Transportation 1 1 1 1 WHB\CVS Pharmacy,Mattituck-23140.00 File:TIS.wpd 1 1 N a W y yr C ;'x'..�•I�FFFY O M1 O o ^ n N n W ` e1 ZL OS.Ye4� V mC`om '@ uCCC N St w%?28 2`b F W L• m e @ We v o 24 W 6mm N►c� f'3Wi m�g5 vNq t76 -ysgm Nuc m. gom�t sa a. `s.� e@ jE €WE ? .c H. 3 ,.-e _~ a" c rnmm = 3oLL8 :w� go a a N�.&9a as2€ 8o � - ww — QiEg� � E < oegyuyuFe Sas co^a9y� ere ~' 8$ 88' W RER Snc �� SE Vo id. y.�� g Wg='�NE nEB F ~y Y 19=mmnm ceoa2 Wa 3E C+E�.aEB �' g Z� j Q> £mx N��msmo, �E „ es s`3 �m P' E 6".0 E U�aoo z gmg WB^ _ .pa5 p0 �a. S §g OggFp 8W AJC y ��Sc rv��Eja & A W 9 n8 JOtq N7 3YmxEC N�� ., , � a s. sa.� g$ c= -a$ 8' S'-.W X85 C E E c'-c ��`oP�'�tiac�Y>°zm y� > g r' owe N dg�a eo� W �gt s iia . � '4•$U v ac'�n z vii yu ma is m�m_/n SaSta E.@,i N z_8 •3 E 8n' '8 N s r n IC d : : " go 1 s s ennNeNeNe �� • ..ne��nnmSNSe�R.e,,$ III Bg _ s �N:;eeemme�o rrr rr � � � ■ a+�o��Nnfn'!n nmm a:$e' I I I 33 � 3 a I v6a Nn�.i 4 p Ig +� rre.ovo n$n S 97 7 ro�aa�vvaa......... ri�ri:-i ei>i ri:i:iawaa n 3 o N N N e N e N e e enn Neeenom ■ i+v'Fai're�.-nnm.nne�rvmaa:v:i @ �d° s Da ............ m Jo � Ca°`iciugm CC Y i = g ' ieSW 'P� Emo _::8� 'ag' •8 0" 5 �Yx sW igW �d yy`� xm� c `g SYf x'uOihi dew � • ' ■ $fin _��rvrvrv�=nrvN ■ $oxo �.ns - $ .10 ■ � 0.'ey{p-pNAih PD ■ OOOONNNOtOV tNV le�lmdg0�� N�^^ j r5 `¢ ®� ' moo mmm v7N E. c g® 'ug.xg000NNNeoNONaego o„ „p ■ mmmm • I I Igmmogo"gm�mu�m oiawVg+mmog�o • `-f �w n ' No�o�$n�gi cu'iggv'�goH =e � ■ I I I m ,; rrr mmm mmm c cY - T IIIA mmm rrr rmm E `e m N V m o�o r g S9 of ec i � sFF I w Ee' 02 '<L_ym1 , Z00 C Z ± L 3 V ¢ w m u < w O 3 rl x 00 F Y CC m�V6 �¢ wd wm wEAL 9 >_ 33 24 YfW vV cru, fix„]j r io 3e, ow OOFmNV m» qE do u�i � � 3-� .0 o m < ¢ u'u v ,a¢i.is x' x' urvwi i LV N N: • L:\25085\cad\Id\planset\25085-PLOTconstruction.dwg PLANT LISTPPRON HARDW(IOD STAKES ICEY BOTANICAL NAM Ca"MME ON NA6m ppC1GOREEEP TMAN (TYP.) .. SHADE TRIBES PP FRAxINUS pENNSYLvANICA 'AUTUMN PURPLE' 9UM'Ili GREEN ASN 2-215' CAL E puf,Z ROOT BALL GT N EV IT61A TRIACANTHOS 'MORAINE' MORAINE HONEY LOCUST 2-21',' CAI. SE\" CUY N1PtE OR NAENTAL TREES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER 10-12 HT. �.d �� BLACK REINFORCED Engineering & Surveying P e AC AMELAMCHIER CANADENS,IS 'CLUMP' CLUMP ISA DOGWOOD (SINGLE 6.I�EM1 2-2Va' CAL �1�, y,J RUBBER ROBE CI, colaNue KOUSA 'CLUMP' ROBIN60N CRABAPPLE 2-215' -Al M'�^ PIPE Transportation MR MALUS 'IOBMSON' iTHREE STRANDS OF #10 GAUGE Land Development CONreIm AUSTRIAN PINE 6-1' 14T �N p 66 TWISTED GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE Environmental Services PN PINUS NIG A 6-1' HLT I�+� PP PICEA PUNGECOLORADO SPRUCE PUNGENS COLORADO G cLET 6 AWND GROMJu COVER O '/i .y�L{ 301 Nott Street CA CLETNR4 ALNIFOLIA 'HUMMINGHIRD' INKIMERIRD 6M'IMERSWEET 16-24' M. ' "' $DIICDCCt6d1r•NY 123U5 IG ILEx w-ABRA P"��"'41 EW P�1! 518 370 8602&FAX 518 370 8606 16 ILEX GLABRA 'SHA1R=<' SHAMROCK INKBERRY 21q' W TRUNK PHARE SHALL BE SET 2' JS JUNIPERUS CHIINENSIS '6ARGENTII' SARGENT JUNIPER 16-24' SPD. f 0Y\, 5\p /�� ' ABOVE THE ESTABLISHED Ph1 PMR NUS MARITIMA BEACH PLUM 2-3 M. `r r i - FINISHED GRADE RW ROSA WICI URIANA MEMORIAL ROSE j 5 ) / EXIST TRE S GAL r n TO THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD' EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE 4-S' HT. W pptV p _ TO R TYP. ARROWUOOD VIBUFNUM 3-4' HIT. VD VIBURJIT1 DENTATUM / Ep+E [i / a I\✓e / 3' PINE BARK MULCH, DO NOT TRAFFICEXISTING ALL A D BENCHES TO RE PLACE MULCH WITHIN 3' OF TRUNK JUNUON �5\p B0;( 0 ® SLOPE TO FORM 3' HIGH SAUCER. , SWC A' + ' w\D�N / - fl OR AD AWDOD STAKE P nSTAKES PER TREE) 11 \RPE 3'I TIGHTEN AS SHOWN PLANT BACKFILL MIXTURE. JC IY IC V UNTIEAND CUT AWAY BURLAP FROM TOWN MEM 1° PARK �y FROM 1/30F ROOT BALL (MIN): 4 \ I 6G IF SYNTHETIC WRAP REMOVE COMPLETELYS USE, SIT ROOT BALL ON 12 RW / I LS HOLE - THREE TIMES FOOTBALL DIAMETER EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL > OR ON COMPACTS SUBGRADE a \/ Z I , 2 MR WITH SLOPED SIDES RW _ _ f _ _ Evergreen Tree IL laming 6/03 & ..+ + + + + + N.T.S. Sburcr. NIB REV LD-604 HARDWOOD STAKES 2 MR a VD 2 I5 8-VD a VD OR DF.ADMAN (TYP.) LOAM & S D — — 19 M- RW CA LOA & SEED ' TREE PIT ZUP _ VGCROOT BALL N /F NORTH FORK BO L INC. —LtlAM SEED I " I M & SEED GUY WIRE 1/21NCH DIAMETER S I _5 CA I RW n BLACK REINFORCED RUBBER I ANDSGAPE NOTE TRAF UI ° HOSE (ABOVE FIRST BRANCH) BOX _ __ I FP L ALL PROPOSED PLANTING LOCATIONS SwALL BE STAKED CAREFULLY 11 S p)>gtr AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR FIELD REVIEW BY THE LANDSCAPE // IO B 2 R THREE STRANDS OF /10 GAUGE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. �J e O 7W151E GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE 2,CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES I M /7 AND NOTIFY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE OF COFFLICTS. s � II (3 STAKES HARDWOOD STAKE _� - II A (3 STAKES PER TREE) 3.NO PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING MUD • .• CCN6TM=ION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA 4.A 3-MC4 DEEP S14REDDEO PIKE BAR,SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER - ALL TREE&AND SHRIBS,AND N ALL PLANTING BEDS,AS SHOWN ` T II A TREE SHALL SET PLUMB, ON THE PLANS,OR AS DIRECTED BY OTHER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 'z T 'w. ° EM S.ALL TREES SHALL Be BALLED AN ° TRUNK FLARE SHALL BE SET D BURLAPPED,UNLESS OTHERWISE I - r I R A ?' _ / LOAM & SEED I AFTER SETTLEMENT NOTED,OR APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE . � B.FINAL ONIAMITY FOR EA.CFI PLAIT TYPE SHALL BE AS SHOWN OH THE / / / FI ABOVE THE ESTABLISHED FLAN T1II6 MASER WALL. TAKE PRECEDENCE IN CASE OF ANY 3 P I M & SEED ° EN � 0 3' MU H CIRCLE FINISHED GRADE DISCFEPAICY BETWEEN oumvvm SHOWN ON THE PLANT LIST AND SPINE BARK MULCH, ON TFE PLAN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY I • C CH (TMP') WITHIN 3' OF TRUNK DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS SHOWN ON 3 M N /, 5 WWI I NOT PACE MULCH THE PLAN AND PLANT LABNG.ELS PRIOR TO BIDDII / ' ° 1,ANY PROPOSED PLAIT SUBSTITUT10,16 MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE 3. 0 CA SLOPE TO FORM _ 3' HIGH SAUCER 6. PLANT BACKFILL MIXTURE. EN ALL PLANT MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE ^' / T 3 SPECIFICATIONS OF THE 'AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY A 6TOCK'BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMIEM y _ N/F NORTH - T" 6 ALL PLANT MATERIALS BHA.L BE GUARANTEED FOR OHE YEAR .' M .° FOLLOWING DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE M ' !-71 UNTIE AND CUT AWAY BURLAP I ••� / FORK INC. / ��ii FROM 1/3 OF ROOT BALL (MIN):Nb' Revbpn Dob pc 10.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMR'ORARK r� ``��Ip W SNOW FENCE ERECT SNOW FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE CM THE TREE ' y13 K �) % PROPOSED CVS 1— IF SrnTHEnC WRAP IS USE, °algn.a by oruwn by CN•cWa by CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE VEHICLES OR MATERIALS WITHIN T / REMOVE COMPLETELY DMC DMC MW. LANDSCAPE AREAS.ANY DgI'7AC>£ TO EXISTING TREES,SHRUB&.OR : _p � I 0 M & SEED LOAM & SEED O m CAO cM1•cF•tl by Approwtl by M W. LAMS *WALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIOJ , , BUILDING AREA � � � SIT ROOT BALL IL ER ON DM c CAST TO THE OWNER I C UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON Sba1e DO�� 5/6105 O COMPACTED SUBGRADE IL AREAE DESIGNATED "HOAR I SEED° SHALL RECEIVE 6" CF LOAM `" I,�, ,,,: 14467 TSF. 4 cL HOLE - THREE TMES FOOTBALL DIAMETER pro7t Tito SPECIFIED SEED MIX LAWNS OVER 2rl SLOPE SHALL BE PROTECTED � _ e � �� 'H1H SLOPE SIDES WITH EROSION CONTIOL FABRIC. p V1, . T L EE c'I DT'opo$ed Retail DevelopemeL �-rI ` nG. LOAM.AND GEED ALL AREAS NOT OTHERWISE TREATED. LOAM & SEEDa '-c = 2 Tree Planting (For Trees Under 411 Caliper) 6/0Z$lock 2 Lots 1 2 4, 27.1 28-3 B. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES ONLY •° ' I Squrec NIB REV ID_60 . ! f f IrEFER TO SITE /GIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ALL OTHER T7J °•• b I 0 r�� O 12 IS N.T.S. SITE COINSTRUOTION WFORRATION. r 3 TPN (rU (JV 10-✓U L'Q- Mattituck,Town of Southold S U 3 Suffolk Co., New York +: a /� ,•,. bw • d for �,,.,.. .....y._,:_ .......,r-. h LOAM & SEED / • ° .. AC9 Construction ' I T P IO IG 3 P 2 ° LOAM & SEED 2 AC I Dreelnq T . 4 P 12 IS / 12 19 / ° I ec' I T ESNTO B MANT FED PLANT 4 N RONT OF 17 PM - D � A AMA% OF tl' TREES TO MAINTAINED 'd rte, CA0J'K 2 PP T PROVOS HEADLI HT i AMAX OF 30' B JS a ° . • A w K SC UT NO Landscape lari��.:PROMO ADLIGH'f 3 IG �r �� OCK SIGH LNE PM EENINGU NOT4CKSIGMEOnelnq Numbr AM & S aop �� p Nallnq .�pinl l• Z PN EA VIII/4 Yllllllpl' ,J011lbp"9,p1111 - ILII C,pNlllVi \0`I �� h1 III = 8111 �4 h,l , _ILII r 4,111 _ \ r/"111 ILII �.,N,'lIlIlI1V, a,O,,_lIlLlIlI, •p\bnri.�nllr — sCM1.a _e6 114.11U,111 zo o zo TO 3 xt� "II U SCALE IN FEET 6 10 3 PP 5 PN 5 PP — I AC Miohe&1 W.JungllenA • PN 4 PN LOAM & SEED LOAM & SEE P0B5Numbv 2 PP N.Y. Pro/e•el°npl Engineer \ _T� AI YP. 5 PP 2 PN No.072072 N/F LSELOTTE H URIST \...\25085\,CwRd\pW=A25085-PIAT. _/.Jutl/ ti--11511 I I I I I Sw 1 UP' NW- ' lopr pN 4 Q^^r V V 61A Point of Beginning 4 °P r'iC 2a lb NRR , y b rvry \ �I a5r � PwP/aP v ,gaSn��PO T/, n �T°EWHy W/ wW ry w'6. �PWP�PWP�PW PWP��PWR 44 1 m0 to OJT ♦ r,` /' WALK EQ ( WALK °O C r, I.x•fW Op 1 P a 16' 20• 40• sa• GRASS P Q TOWN MEMORIAL �j 1 F Scale: 1"=20' PARK ry^3 'I ,,ro N� su Acwal scale may have been.lUred among repladucwn WA Always check against graphic scale r b' OR w FLAG 1/2•tE _ o �\�• �GJ + 4A' ePCR POLE R .o >' GRASS 1£ SIGN CONCRETE WALK ve 51 S� "NO PIPINGa�/Pr 2]B R1 xs W/S WALK 0 3 4W = CENTER Legend LINE OF SIGN To215 hRENH 'nom a Sign --PWG--- Overhead Utility Wires 'WELCOME TO 0 SIGN �?'tw P MATTITLI Nl 'ENTER" w\ ® Gatch Basin ---'GAS --- Underground Gas Service I @URB ] t, RI _ SLOP pr`` u a3 ry• f 155 3A yzess I2N'SS teccz Io m \ a CENTER LINE OF © Gas Meter -- 9 p — GR Z p z o\ RENCH ® Drainage Manhole DYE Double Yellow Line hone Servers ^m -p DRENCH \ 1P t awP 10 0 ° �Z2\ %DUTIN ° Pm `` 1O'�a mzz \ ® Water Manhole SWL Build White Line C° `` tczai? E%R• SIGN \ Yo 253WALK ®Gv esv Gas Valve OWL Dashed While Line F c°NO .+P•' o Bc •STOP•• D Telephone Manhole PIPE Finished Floor Elevation h 11 BL 2 G0.P55 V G°NC tc z] W `v tc 2zv z1� rR SIGN 'p Traffic Signal Box TC Top of Curb Elevation B up ' ALF ♦ Bc o, RN.CHT non \ b Light Pole BC Bottom of Curb Elevation mn 19 ♦. rrn BE Electric Meter X 22 0 Spot Elevation In�•V / 5/5 WALK ° N \ m o fMl Irrigation Car l Bon TR Top of Manhole Rim Elevation o 1 ai,`/ osis ¢n G +°N S°G, wOVERHEgG iR_gFFIC LINE _–I G._ rL6'�9�R ,..• �I s/s05/5s'tAW5LAN LK HPN�NEMENt3l ��L �Qt 'j9, 0J1 ® Drainage Intel eat A Water Metert er 582} oUtility Pale ODaImage lnee Intel Others(Not Vsl ___ 1b hSPNLayiR P09 Utility Vault p `` 5N� er'nR2e't SPX ° UtilityManhole m PITPITGON PPJE ry5 5/s ✓' y.e g \� O Iran 4.BEp4 r'hr P/ , 2]535 WALK �/ 10 /2B lCry+2N N m • Ballard 2.5't5 0 cuY ��\\ GRA55 ° '� Lp• q � °fn k Handicap Parking Space Painted Traffic Directional jgl�a aT� wnsK \L \ z+A / m' w 9 0 5 P 0) Arrow �� }45 CR ftBtG'L /2°e S/S OSSK. CONC, C CU m • Z C] sQ +e° are'P wALK Tse HLA (REE reAMP eoN „ 7 °, s v v \ Ing Numberof Parkin fti^. • , @ NCRA55 y Do A'OTF r0J °5 :N x F'im O A ` P ,A P)�Ii \ A 5 aces 9 +va /S 3 1+S SIGN O\GI,P / GO wALK M1 z ^HANNING" Q �\ I sQ Sanitary Sewer Manhole 5.11 29.35 ,N', 25' �,15j PNft X14.8 °5 STOOP 13 Lf ♦R"'•, a`m' \ i tc� EtC WPIN o250r. W/RAIL BB' 03'3 '�19y v1 �`N rSB, IGH 0 RBM1�° N25 N. •\ 5 1, V "HANDICAP raft m' /1Ns, PAINTED ,,/ ///��JS / PACHING" \\ '03' FF5 (ARROWS DIRECT NAL " // \ E/S WALLA / 2 tx (SEE)N°TE Ia) W/S \ I \\ Survey Notes ®G \ e I'3W (7r° µALN ® Tax Lots 2,4,27. 1,28. 1,& 30 `� G2'3w 1) Unauthorized alteration or addition to this survey is a violation of Section 7209, Sub-Division 2 of the z °9' LOT AREA = 1 .786± ACRES TR 2z o°G GAL © IR/ S Nw m \P\¢ TANK I New York State Education Law. Copies of this survey map not bearing the surveyor's inked or embossed seal shall not be considered to be a valid true copy. ve a JB B P \ nOr-BBI4 ) III..L c PECIL 2) Certifications indicated hereon shall run only to the person for whom the survey is prepared, and on °'�� `P sgrvrr TR 22] W"" , �� \ his behalf to the Title Company, governmental agency and lending institution listed hereon, and to m Laoxa'F o R^ }2'SW m \ the assignees of the lending institution. Certifications are not transferable to additional institutions or VELA GMUR Pool a ¢ CENTER e, q G S� `I E rR ]1. W/5 mm LINE OF subsequent owners. \ ®GV �, ` ` 14a WALK TRENCH F TAX LOT 27.1 �°�' G9'Sw 17TIN PW Gw &\\ g 3) This survey was prepared in accordance with the current code of practice for land surveys adopted \\ " by the New York State Association of Professional Land Surveyors. my tx "ENTER' A \ 4) This survey was prepared without the benefit of a title report and may be subject to any easement of �mo� %n/ °A BI s tc 2v' _w-' (�� ga record and other pertinent facts which a title search might disclose. P y nGP O } ]x'3 W'�' o CENTER \ Am ° 2 m e21ie w aPPreox WATER $i\\ \ TRENCH \ 5) Offsets shown hereon are for a specific purpose and should not be used as a basis for construction \ TAX LOT / s ! p GRAIN \SERVICE of fences or other structures. \ 30.1 de cz?Iw', (BY OTHERS) AA /W/S 2 *m slcN/crop' \\ w/s WALK \� o N ta? ,m "ENTER ,pD.YSw 6) Building offsets and dimensions are to finished exterior unless otherwise noted. NO 'Pm BS . t °PMpACS50. ag\ SLR^•�°a�\' 3p CNRe£ `;, 7) Hedge and fence offsets shown are to centerline unless otherwise noted. °i `P• / (t \\ Ne N. • cGNG w°0cG° * "No RIGHT W/s sm \ 8) Underground utilities shown hereon, based upon old survey (see note 9). ! � OB OENGE TURN" WALK � \ ,TAX LOT 2 R 21+ � VISIBLE LY3w °o mo U 9) Based upon a survey prepared by Vanessa Han en Bruslin, Inc. las[re vised Augustust 30, 2004, and DRAINAGE L STRUCTURE updated for Final Survey by B Thayer Associates on January 17, 2006. C (TYPICAL) w/s wALK FF rip � N \ R 211 R^ / AB°// ] 10 L m g, 10) Painted traffic directional arrows shown hereon based upon "Layout and Materials Plan", prepared by o 6t ------ tE ftNMP c CQX" APPROx LOCATION ' Vanasse Haugen Bruslin, Inc. last revised June 7, 2005. Pavement covered by 1"-3"of ice and snow B N Ba SaR w J 5 if v 'O. / NGftr' Cc P 01 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ��, 2a N \ 4 9 G° p111H SN0r VISIBLE, TYPICAL) at time of survey by B Thayer Associates, and was not visible. �O �^ O• E/5 WALK BC yt. SIGN \ y6/ 252 NSPHhLt PNPF.Mr-N? J •nCN\ `GN CGNpR `SEE NOTE 12) '' \\ ) f ) P 9 11 Elevations shown refer to NAIVE) B8 based upon NGS Bench Mark No. K 335 haven an established n °"3 SIGN m oz o v °DO nor EMER" Bc z H PAD / elevation of 15.47 feet. \ 7 NO LEFT ' SIGN ]03' °O,P JTURN" SIGN tc zynlR P a '� "DO NOT ENTER" °°� \ C) Q cq 4 1 SIGN •Exlr" Ba m// ,a Zoe 00 ° I 12) Drainage and Sanitary structures and pipes shown hereon were compiled from field information when ti� e 'crap (t�j• \ cervreR \\ visible and from"Grading and Drainage Plan" prepared by Vanessa Hangen Bruslin, Inc., last revised June 7, 2005 LINE TRENCH (\�\ IPIN GRASS DRAIN t \\� \\� Sf0 StEW1G1 T ] PPIN Na / G• ,y' ...II�� ^`^es` CEN \ LINETER \ TRENCH \\ D D GRAIN VA. �` SIGN \•OZ 1 p�'(6 "Do No ENTER• �w JAI,) 2 7 200G •' i E/S WALK "IGN ENTER" Q 1.83E — ' S 20'39' 10E N� I \-5.54' -- �+^ ZPx V(] / \ l .lvF��_r N GRA55 PER BY DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION \\ �0p0 \ \ �--� 100 Crossways Park Drive West, Suite 104 • \ 1 Woodbury, New York 11797 E/s WALK eGv o,a'mw xft \ T: (516) 364-0660 F (516)364-0668 B. T H A Y E R ASSOCIATES www.bthayerassoclates.co[es.coo 2. g9 2 mn^ Copym9hi U 2006 by B Thayer Aasogalee All Rlghs Reserved Ummth.mmd alarshon ce addition to this survey map 1s a vrolallon at Sechon 9209,Sub-0rvrelon 2,of the New Yank Stale Education Law TEN ° m FEN Copies of Itis survey map nal beano,the land surveyors Inked seal or embossed seal shall not be considered a valla(me copy, \\ LE ° wOpO3s DRAWING TITLE Final Survey 5 ORP FEN, PROJECT NAME — .r .J END \0.2EN \Pr V ETE t AnnLOCA1104 CVS/pharmacy o;''3E bill Main Road Mattituck, Suffolk Co., NY SCTM: Dist. 1000, Sec. 143, Blk. 2, Lots 2, etal \ \ URI BY .RAW ING°ATE PROJECT NUMBER \ \\ Stavros Timotheou, PLS M. Feta 01117106 Lsns qM SUFFOLK CO. DIST. 1000 SEC. 143 BLK. 2 LOTS 214127. 1,28-30 NYS PLS#050216 CHECKED Y ;cnL40 $U2l IEFUALtE�_UUA1aN 0:\Suffolk\1000\143\0002\DWGS\SU-2(FINAL)dwg, Flnal Survey, 1/23/2006 2:13:04 PM,pull\\hserverG1\K1P2001-V ITEM 687.0201 -2-4"YELLOW FULL BARRIER LINE ITEM 635.0101 -REMOVE MEET EXISTING EXIST. MARKINGS(TYP.) ITEM 688.04 \, \ � \ L��VEMEI:�MARKINGS 1 t \ \\ y WHITE PREFORMED \ S IGS BEE ROAD PAVEMENT SYMBOL(TYR) TRANSITION TO MEET SAWCUT EXIST.PAVEMENT ITEM 688.01 EXIST.CURB ITEM 205 - 24'WHITE PREFORMED ITEM 635.0101 -REMOVE Z \ CONCRETE CURB WITH 1"REVEAL PROP. EDGE OF �� \ \ STOPLINE(TYP.) EXIST. MARKINGS(TYP.) �� \\ (SEE DETAIL BELOW) TRAVELLED WAY \\ \ Q ITEM 687.0101 EXIST. EDGE OF ITEM 887.0101 \ PROP. DRIVEWAY RESTORATION _ ITEM 687.0101 4'WHITE BROKEN LINE 4"WHITE DOTTED LINE (SEE DETAIL BELOW) TRAVELLED WAY \ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -�- \\\ \ O 4"WHITE LANE LINE (2'LINE,4'SPACE)(fYP.) MEET EXISTING _ �` \ PAVEMENT MARKINGS \ � \ CAMAS / MEET EXIST. PAVEMENT FACTORY AVENUE \ A \'\ WIDENINGIRESTORATION 2 \ (SEE DETAIL BELOW) // 887.0101 ITEM 688.01 4"WHITE LANE LINE 24"WHITE PREFORMED / -- - STOPLINE ITEM 667.0701 �P') ITEM 688.04 ITEM 687.0101 4"WHITE BROKEN LINE \ \ !� WHITE PREFORMED ) 4'WHITE DOTTED LINE PAVEMENT\ '� PAVEMENT SYMBOL(TYP.) /2Q/ / / (2'LINE,4'SPACE)(TYP.) \ \ "N ITEM 687.0201 -2-4"YELLOW O \\ \ \ FULL BARRIER LINE m \ \ FACTORY AVENUE PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN SIGSBEE ROAD & FACTORY AVENUE FACTORY AVENUE SCALE: V=30' SCALE: 1'=20' 680.54 680.72(3 TURNS) PARALLEL(TYP.) 10206.0310 680.520203(4) >. 680.72(8) ((� O >J N 70680.5105 ox � ` EXIST. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT N U3 U A9FS n'� `TO REMAIN 10206.0310 680.520106 660.71(2) / ITEM 688.01 -12'WHITE PREFORMED / N I CROSSWALK LINE 4'WHITE ED I SAW CUT - ITEM 205 I 4'WHITE EDGE LINE O• / k /' 680.71(2) SAW CU'f 1X1" ASPHALT TDP COURSE - ITEM 51 F% ITEM 205 2)¢" DENSE BINDER - ITEM 51 FX IN EXIST.CONDUIT MAIN ROAD (N.Y.S. ROUTE 25) 880.77(2) (2) 4" STABILIZED SOIL-AGGREGATE SUBBASE- ITEM 4S N EXIST. j / -� _ U UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION - ITEM 2AS CONCRETE CURB (1" REVEAL) ITEM 97A - -- ---- -- // ---- _- - ----_ -_-- - _- --- 1)4'ASPHALT TOP COURSE - ITEM 51FX �- 4X1" DENSE BINDER (2 LIFTS) - ITEM 51 FX 6" STABILIZED SOIL -AGGREGATE SUBBASE- ITEM 4S rT _ UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION ITEM 2AS / WIDENING/RESTORATION DETAIL N.T.S. DUNN 660.71(4) ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C. g / _ Consulting Engineers 680.71(2) r- ---- 66geach, NY 71978 MaiWesthStreet IN EXIST.CONDUIT \ 2 �n (631)288-2480 S DD JUN 2 12D04 � k RESET EXIST.PULLBOX I \ CVS - MATTITUCK I . N ITEM 10880.77 10206.0310 Southold Town m e 680.520203(4) Planning Board 9 / / I 680.72(8) 680.54 680.72(3 153 REVISIONS / PARALLELU( TYP.) NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY OFF-SITE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL & PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN DATE SCALE DEA NIY 06/18/04 AS SHOWN 23140 MAIN ROAD ( ROUTE 25) DESIGNED BY DRAFTED BY SHEET N0. SCALE:: 1"1'==29 20' A.G./P.L. A.G./C.D. 1 OF Z L\25085\cad\I mn .e \SCDH Sewer Application\25085_P .dwg Com• NO l — _—___ -- % alt •t /j co" M^•.. .. 'f/jam/\%.��'��__F�C' �____ _/ //�� Engineering of Surveying, P Transportation / \ Land Development % ----- -- --i - / / ��' 1 l Environmental Services TRAFFIC F \ /°,mow "� �� ? ' /'��, ..�� c , y��g %� � _ 301 Nott Street .JUNCTION �'{0 13 ' / �l -1 11�% ..W ' Qvl- „jam ,,': i 1V ' P.O.B. (✓Q��B \ ED Schenectady,NY 12305 BOX ❑ i -- p�lU�\(�, - i� ` Fk, �%� /- ,a% _ / _ 518 370 8602$FAX 518 370 8606 °r DEsc. THr� SUP Owners: W/i ✓ m 25- L _ �/�'� , - °l "v/� '\ y Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) °i Northfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2,28, 29) 27.Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 0 1 Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) I �. � S � \\ ',I er Applicant: ZegenLaker Development Group,LLC N7 810 ] A� A} �� J6' V % 1 PROPERTY LINK ,BG-4 CONCRETEICE curse CP 25 \' 24 23 2 _ BG-7 �— II BUILDING Department of Health Services Approvd for Construction other Than Single Femllr —4— MINOR CONTOUR b, tI PRerfoejreonccte No.�Ic? O Dadgs Flow 22 22 t( C 1. — 20— MAJOR CONTOUR 558 Theon plans h �h reviewed for general aonformann ng to water '�--�� / - - - � '2�4__ - - - L_____ • DRAIN MANHOLE County Deparhnent of Health S;rvicea atandawle, relating to unlit Octmg U supply end sewage disposal. Regardless of ea omissions, y \ 3gd - �, inconsistencies lack of detail, construction h required to be in TRAF Ut ��- - — —•r— �= - - — -I- — — ='F — 2 ® TRENCH DRAIN es a y °\ BOX a . 2 _____- BG-5 J \ n accordance with the attached t conditions and applicable -�- 0 0 ° ' • SEWER MANHOLE SMH standar unless specifically waived pprov Pdby unleea dor renc ed. ( ) ds, speci0relly waived by the Department.This nppruval expires 9 ears from the ■ GAS \ ' -- 1\ • LEACHING POOL MANHOLE LPMH � 25. � rJl 7 � ( ) METER / 'L °' �fy„' - %� • / <� --�4 90 B 1 • _ a. sal �', 11 PProo a e �v . <Rn-1 4 .7 �3 BG-8 ,,� NOTES: 't 94 5 a. . J 6 DEP. 02 y / ' / /- d SEPTIC (c X2' 3 1. GALLONS/DAY/ACRE SEWAGE DISCHARGE = 600 GPD/AC x 1 .7861 AC _ s6 MR 25 _ °. i / i' /' R='3 /0 I = 1071 .7 GPD � �-!7 yEN ' / R-23.= 2. NO SURFACE WATERS/WETLANDS EXIST WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SITE _ PROPERTY LINES. 233,3 1 -------- i REPTI /0 �i 3. ONE WATER SUPPLY 'NFLL AND SANITARY DISPOSAL SYSTEM EXISTS ON ti T k � �' �, '� �, � �`p. � `� SITE, WHICH WILL BE ABF,f�DONED DURING CONSTRUCTION. NO NEIGHBORING ! i I EXISTING GRAS TRA I IWELLS OR DISPOSAL SYSTEMS EXIST WITHIN 150 FEET OF THE SITE �., / PTIC TANK, AND LEACHING 23 d SLn PROPERTY LINES. L _ _ _ s2 /' / ENPOOLS WITH SAND IN AC 6AlGE n1eag ITH LOCAL AND STATE Rl � y Opp I i Im— :� // =a j,. .� BG—9 �.,tiil r � ➢� I�I C,,1 <I 2367 z�-_ ”' PROPOSED CVS - Y'' 5 /,5/p4 ^ ['I��v,,.,4 ( TOWNSHIP COMMENTS aq 1 Bc-3 -�4- '! BUILDING AREA PROPosED /�- -` r' `69 /U II L t[��` "! �` 4 RE`ASIONs PER NYfippT COMMENTS 6/18/04 �lY • \ / 14467 ±SF. - SM (�j r (7.- ' , T4� \ '- � � 3 RENSIONS PER NYSOOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 cO / a ` /' + LEACHING POOL ' s.' R=22,Z. I' i I // PVC <," II to I ,. 223_ / 2.2 2.09 FFB=25.5 AREA ROPOSED MH � ; ��., i -� ^ 13 �` � �+ y�� _r.� 2 eenea+s vm rote ar sowann wuemrs 3/7/0{ 1 SEPTIC TANK R-22.6 q� / �+� g N REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS /lo`04 tl p � a / _ TAX BLOCK 2 (SEE DETAIL) r(I S ' / " __ LOTS 1 , 2 4, 27.1 28, 29 & 30 LPM1ri 2_, BP4 g^e Y - C J. �' DEED AREA: 77 801 SQ. FT. �i LPMH 1 "I `- `• ° \ CAD a b prC b eneeeea d .- . 1 / <Cem� , .�-� ono eneekeaby DMCDMC ADM ab by MWJ R=22.3 2; (1 .7861 ACRES) =22:5 I 45 LPMH 3 �' . 'I �+ se-1- le.20' Date 1!19/04 R C71t �\ B� Prefect TRIe _ '= z 16 / �� BG-10 o p Proposed Retail Developement BG-2 6" FIRE CONNECTION 0 CONN � 0 �V4'ater 9 SIAMESE CONNECTION _ --� EXIST NG ATER MAIN �� s� District 1000, Section 143 20 I 6" DUCTILE IRO -1 0' 4.5' -MIN.- Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 °7 T \ �� o �// zs s6.�m \ Park - 2' TYPE "K' COPPER \ h �------ _ a DOMESTIC WATER ! PE", K" C PPER 1- Q' 4.5' MIN. B.G. VAUL I c \� B �P� \\, Mattituck,Town of Southold 2 CONNECTION / R0 Marina� , � ^, �. \CH, Zf" Suffolk Co., New York / rz B -11 e/�\ i..ued for 1 IT. tel,\ • ?03g t 20g I t �• 01•+ • o �O\\ �� Site Plan Review vv 033 B �12 7 si 20.56 • • - • ' ,• /�� ° ° •l F Not Approved for Construction ate�ans Bt} pmwing Tllla y 2 District Park of Sou�o �� \� 1�`✓/ / 1� Utility Plan - 9-77 Site Location Map Feat6i D 1000 20 _ } _ —�� _ — — — — _. (Suffolk Co., NY, DOH Submission) e >�_ < s,B S69'2D�50"W — 'IJ6s 6: -------9 2 70 W CON C.m0J FN Di 0'39'10"E o � ,00 u \ �. pmwing Number ` 2 a 5.54' JAN 2 1 stsowwe„sr V / ref ; N� �o y P C-4 M 70Od r, I' —1CD i % II ; G2i,. *C 5heet of �I p � 20 0 20 40 : O ¢ 4 10 . S z EXISTING WATER MAIN' I + �c^ Z SCALE IN FEET ,r„_ ,. Miclige( :7uiighaTts Project Number M _ IL rkYJ 1frefereionol Engineer 25085 �\ z I I No.072072 LD-Plot.dwg L\25085\cad\Idnset\BCDH Sewer Apphcotion\25085_PL .ivg 1 ('na u1n tatin}1,V _ 171L1g1innc NebP,.Jea I'ro=v_eo C`.'S P,e,s,,< 25585 Lesee �pao,eD CVS rmle¢x 2$Of3$ Prblea MMM, CJS she., zsa BS mravom `I+1}{,Ivdr N'/ weer 3 m ! toovm: f'In+filurk, Ny soar I w 3 1or�bpa MA+!,lvcic, N% she.t 2 of 3 ca..b:dey: D"`IC earw I'e/. VENTED CAST IRON FRAME AND camemea by. DML mM 2/3/03 Caledleted by. DMC rote. rz/31.3 Im.Ndbv'. core II e/-z 7 GRATE TO BE APPROVED BY 0—.by -1 ?LCVrscl 1/rs/64 eheaYed by. Date IJ Vise, J/2$/y cherlenae db Ht I/WlC �P bee Z- i-I Gr 'B/01! SOUTHOLD TOWN WITH Tae 5ept+E r"I, C'J"U Toe 5ep66 Td.4 f, Lcedvw Pool Cnlay � a I Engineering & Surveying, P.C. "SANITARY SEWER" ON COVER S -_ __ g g .v- g� Transportation PAVEMENT e1 L.ndP„1 Des _.c.u, .,Uq L�sln Land Development - +�eierrn�n+e Av 5�t n �._ , E'nVlrOnmental .S'eLVICCS 1' MIN I l9� DwilS Flo MIe {faM pro aeeu 6wiln m 5Fwo4 t , ?n a I+I , ''ec4ro 17 "Ce AI! Arcrt 12er(uirer S S.> c{ �_ Ti 4 Hr,r,. ' t ' 1<1e.aN 1ce1 EAr9r es' MA�cs 800 301 Nott Street 1 9 :Is crn; s >II 7 0 I-L l -- 'F' e uel�Ii+ I Schenectady,NY 12305 "` Lr-iol+ � and 6 ie ac luso e ;ac'; c( l OSe � rJG>I e{fet J �nre F6oVe flew fMK w/rn,.aWVA+ vYsl .� SewM a {Ip,a rA�< sio All Arta iu rcmive 'µe f: n s neiiw fi iGe ---_ Cr 'pr� 51ore + 9 ,, °" �"'�'''^ `'' 1 518 370 8602a FAX 518 370 8606 71+� .5�new�r�, � � s s+w 5'Grw.li lenrh l.. Nr,,:e Fr ea ° Ci 0.03 9pJ/S'f ,res& flexr AI — belo,,. +l•e i. 1l 4 p,�e A NAn..,...� l��are.Ae le,el,,,,l 5co=n�c m• s.- _�suss n �r oN w e,,,. l Ss rf<e E . Owners:�F sJr1/;ih LINLET p0/sf - 455 �D RrtChiapetta (Lot 4) z No"lork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2,28, 29) ({ren l 6j44eee Ar fo WAl w( ?I+�S 1 Cws+rMcfrua -for a >yslrn pill D Des, a clew - saw a use Pools = 7. S I Boo A.1 SGs tr{ x 1 �s' A B4 I a--l- �= �- ' Mattituck Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) al 5y.{eN a for o l ar r1 v s le F.;)3 1 o cs, p e �) 9 5�` ;� J Northfork Properties Inc., LLC (Lots 1, 30) IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS , 9 Me> osi.., ir>' nid.+ w w<.!I AreA' eireoHx Lu 6} SOIL K ® ® ® SOIL - 8 ® ® Uac Ay9 'D:.Ij Flow r41r. of 9 D far 5: fiC TMa4 D-,J`3 9 ® 6' EFFECTIVE G' r'1/ Applicant: DEPTH +crMwe s,ze of +"I, - 5cp},L "s s6116e Desi a, wale I �WIS � h' �{�=el c xl�� OK Laker Development Group,LLC n 2 full Inf ,b of 3eWM9e(4~Di,pa - �uerHwc No;�41 c{' S'�cwnll 6..!a.., laic+ 7 �a {e{{wlYive nep!•�,�, -^-- 15,A.1) N/ QY x s ,r,�h Arr = 80 altil+etaAtf //awa6/" 54 f Y F� Velo.+e Di.vWslo.us (lo' f c3LNprrc,rl +,�); 'Tf-C 8.66)Zx 4'hr94 1.5 q`3 T 10' MIN 9 = 235,6 L + 5i�e rs i/u Gvouue�uxr-lee I%Hclgjeweecr = 1,7G0 qnl 5�9eww Arra 8co v�.1' - S5S.3 <{ t LZONB T B fo00G��j�GYC Ltt4 � '' '` •, — '"• Wem.',-F rA;,C1r. W411 = 8, 1wr' x 2,16 A,dkx o, L : J�i•fC is 1. 7frlCl.o1w4ca(/e NoU/ BACKFILL MATERIAL TO BE /,7FfLlocres x (eo08i,el�ge = /07/,)fir CLEAN, SAND, AND GRAVEL = 100 I Tolwl volume of 7WAlt° 1,7nU9+1- IW ,rI = 1roG�p N�r ' �ryiA�T�v mea tl — M 5 xw,_ kr = 31,4 ' WS T W yr0 N t v'.wan.,w...,..,�w,..a,..n ramsse na„ren m„:no,,n,c N- j?; S sF IG�9g'= 17 ` T<la.l Ileti,1 2 FT. MIN. ABOVE ou-'e,11-osdread., ai�v ��, l__-- _J by Dept.DmigafthSaGl� Ag7, GROUNDWATER . � ,.w..m=.ownu� ,m„w,,w•Has,' ms"he,mr aa,n�,m• .,mn�,r„: , f Health Leaching Pool Detail /03 Approval Construction meth r7bmSngle a Approvd for Construction-Other Then Slagle FamHy N.T.S. Source: VHB LD Project Septic � Septic Tank & Leaching Pool Design Calculations 11/03 �Cer�C{ Thaw plane haT406e6 reviewed for geese]rnotmm ume with Suffol!'. . N.T.S. Source: VHB LD County Department of Health :nr+gces standards, relating to we'. supply and sewage disposal Regardless of any amI Inconsistencies or lack of detail, construction is required to be in accordance with the attached permit conditions and applicable standards,Daiwa specifically waived by the Department,This approval expires 8 years from the all d or renew JAN 11 2005 C 32 32 30 30 SANITARY SEWE INV = 20.5 (13UI B BUILDING LINE 28 28 SEPTIC TANK DRYWELL O O RIM = 2.7 RIM 1 22.3 (LPMH 2) 26 RIM 2.6 _7N RIM T 22.5 (LPMH 1) 26 INV = 18.6 (OUT) RIM 22.2 (LPMH 3 - FUTURE) INV 18.4 (ALV DRYW LLS) 24 BUTT IN = 9.4 (ALL DR)WELLS> 24 PROP. GRADE 22 - - 22 5 TOWNSHIP COMMENTS 7/15/04 ss 4 REMSIONS PER NYSOOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 3 REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 _ — 2D 2 Rma es PER Ta.c,m ,.nn cvxuvns 4/1$964 20 -t RC CAST IRON LAYERS 33 LF — LEACHING POOL 1 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 6• PVC — (LINE TO PMH'S 1 & 2) F1MSHED GRADE No. Re CVS Deas PRva — 18 17 F r H3 - — U 18 za 2 Ml- 24' Designed by Drawn by w Red by LINE TO LRH 3 - FUTURE :j '• 16 TRAFFIC BEARING SLAB -----) ^ �20� l fi MIN DMC DMC MWJ 16 INLET-- L CAD cheeped by DMC Approved by MWJ MIN. 4'DIA e somx DatR 1/19/04 OUTLET CLASS 2400 RDW UNE I r MIN. 4'DIA. 14 14 PIPE OR EQUIVALENT Proviso Title RTCMEO 1/4'/i' Ii' n IB' 2400 PIPE OR i 1. EQUIVALENT _ L PITCHED I/BYI' 8' Proposed Retail Development 12 — 12 o,s�egp� T. / ��,;;�T1+ lo' I 1 District 1000, Section 143 e raa..x. SEPTIC TANK Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 10 10 r r +_'�• 4 MIN. Mattituck,Town of Southold 8 8 j- —1TM4x — Suffolk Co., New York 0+00 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 90 Issued for FIGURE 2 ® EXPANSION LEACHING POOL CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK Site Plan Review Sanitary Sewer Profile 11/03 PAGE 22 Not Approved for Construction Dmwns Tne N.T.S. Source: VHB LD SERVICE LATERAL Plan & Section View Schematic Septic Tank and Leaching Pool Layout Details & Calculations DETAIL TAKEN FROM "STANDARDS FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR SEWAGE SYSTEMS FOR OTHER THAN (Suffolk Co., NY, DOH Submission) SINGLE FAMILY HOMES- PAGE 22, DATED FEBRUARY 5, 1988. Septic Tank Detail Drwwlp9 Number 11/03 ®eyp0 aF NNbB, eaq�®�...... e 9s Z: F fie`. yi i Sheet of 5 10 MicheeTun gProles[ Number N.Y Professional Engineer 25085 No.072072 LD-Piot.dwg NEW TO.RIDGE ELEV 31'--2' NEW RIDGE _ ELEV O R 5' IIllIN\\V'//^11111 u 1- _ _ it L 1 1 -_ L'J1 - I, - -- NEPTUNE, CENTER 66 �� -- I- _� 1 319 ROUTE 66 'i li 1 J I, 11J ll _ Fa.xi�i3i S154BOO ' EXIST.T.O.RIDGE EkIST.TA.ROOF JOHN S. MONTALTO NT.LIC 02053 ��' ELEV.IA' 0' 2 ELEV. N- 12'-10' - - - - _ _- _- EXIST.TO.ROOF -_' -- __ ELEV ./- IP-b' ARCHITECT OR 51GNAIDRE ENGINEER 4 SEAL BOX GEV. ELEV. H- 0'-0' FRONT ELEVATION SCALE I/S' = I'-0' _ - - - - — - -_� SIGNATURE SEAL DATE T11J JL I f I - - CONSULTANT: �� IJ � IIL 1 � �_1 - - - EXIST.TO ROOF III EXIST.7A.PARAPET =- . - _-— - -- - , - .-- - __ _- " . -_ -,- - -. _ - - _ - - _ - -_ -- -_ __ - - ELEV. H- 12'-I0' ELEV16'-0' XIO.DECK— ELEv ./- I4 '-5' 1 � ® L l--1 - ILJI - ,� I i ELEv. ./ 0 m Y CONSULTANT: - �E s- LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 2 SCALL: I/e' , 1'-0' LO.RIDGE - -- - -- - Jli ELEV. V- 1T-10' - - -- _ ------ EXIST w. PA0, Ir cvs/ ELEV. Ib'-0' Y r-, --- -- --� pharmacy NEW STORE / AS-IS STORE NUMBER: 3105 9870 Main Road MATITUCK, LI, NY w REVISIONS: REAR ELEVATION REVISED PER PLANNING BD. MTG. 04/01/04- SCALE 4/01/04SCALE Ire' - 1'-0' REV. PER CVS PLANNING BD. MTG. 5/3/04 QE c EoV E � MAY 2004 NEW TO.PARAPET 11 l _ Southold Town Planning Board _Ll' a1lIJ 1 -lL — ulll� JJ�fI .L 11_ - - - -. - _ 1II-, . 1 ' - _ = DRAWING BY: MMA - c -- r 11 JL I1 1 _—= fI - - `l - E v 00 DATE: 03/30/0L - L _ _ - __ _ 1I lLL '.I l iL TA.HANSARD ROOF — 1j -- —_ -_ r�_ 1-� I_ J = --- - L 1._ lLl -'1 MMA JOB NUMBER: 02-03511 NEW TA.COR+IICE ELEv. -e � - CORNICE _-_ -- - _ _ _- - - -- TITLE: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: ELEV. ., PEL-(ALT 3) t - - �+ - ' COMMENTS: — NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR RIGHTSIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1/SINFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY ;// 4 ' = I'-0' J n" NEW T.O.RIDGE ELEV,3l T IN ELEV.76 b'qL+ - IIIII > I MA I I� llll l J'llli� I [� EXIST TO.RIDGE 3291 ROUTE 66 — — NEPTNNE. NJ. 01753 EX57.T.O.ROOF _-_ - _ _ _. ELEV.Id'-0' 31 SIB-2300 _ . .__ TEL !1 ) 8- 300 ELEV. H- 11'-10' __ =— _ _— — --- -- --- --- -"' - -----— IMAX. ('131) 918-2351 _ EXIST To.ROOF `r JOHN 5. MONTALTO N.T.LIC. 030531 ELEV. ./- IL_b. ARCHITECT OR SIGNATURE ENGINEER < 5EAL BOX GROJNDELEV. .- •T ' _ "- .rte 0'-0 - - - - FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1/8• . 1'-0' �%! ,�`� •'(F\1 - - - - 11 Fll� 7.12-oy 11 { LI II = - SIGNATURE -- SEAL DATE IL Ilgl'IIiLLJ , — _ 111111 Iii — — -- — — — u i _)J � �� „ �IJi� CONSULTANT: EXIST T.O.PARAPET - - - - -..=.v .,� -__ �.,�,,... - - — - _ - _ -_ — - _ ELEV. ./ Ib'-0' -- _ - - - - _ _ EXIST TO.ROOF _ ELEv X T. A [DEC ELEV. N Id'-e' I I - 0 - - - GROUND EL V. --__ - E2., ",z may`- 'TMTT CONSULTANT: LEFT SIDE ELEVATION - - T.O.RIDGE - II ELEV. ./- Il'_10' _ � AELEV. G' O' T j = pharmacy NEW STORE / AS- IS - STORE NUMBER; 3105 9870 Main Road MATITUCK, LI, NY 3 REAR ELEVATION REVISIONS: SCALE 1/e' = 1'.0' REVISED PER PLANNING BD. MTG. 04/01/04 REV. PER CVS PLANNING BD, MTG. 5/3/04 NEW TO PARAPET ET� 2 1 _ — 11111 I 'IJII I L 1 3 4 BY:DRAWING 0P3la/mm3�00.M6/foM0arn14EEV5BIT DATE: � r!D ROOF _+ NR p coR ICE NEW TA.CORNICE _ — --_ _ _ — — 1 _ _ 1 -- — - ELE�ra_m. MMA JOB NUMBER: 02-035LL ELEV. R __-- ---- TITLE: LLLILLU r I� PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 77E =i ul � �00 'i� � SHEET NUMBER: PEL- ( ALT 3) _ _ GRp1ND ELEV. - ,=��`4`�, �-�, �s��.�r� _ �}4 r��2_ � - �� r __ � •�� - r,�� i-3,-' - = ELEV y- 0'_m•T COMMENTS: RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR SCALE 1/a' = IR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY r' � �� / EeyNNmLxq� SEE RpflwAY .FAU.EYFHi . AMO WN u of wNN Izwf NIU CkTNLS Iraflelwvel pC UINR /�_- p Owzr. LLTNtS i�� I Reb.n cu.Mtl Mq �E NuiEiut&nllcflm],1a341 is PDUNG E xe E Nmd[��Id4e,slL�am'Iim A Hr CR..W um / / I 0 xlx x wJE aEm1 W(NF RENENi . ' EVwN C.R E° LtlTblC.rey.LLC Sign Summary W. CPE°Bq'pX 1 1 1 1 nfld xu&: / I(• ( Nr_N4L�1 4 °Erb.ni ms°Iwa 'o-' d - f //- —I— uNc Pp ib°al SEE HQm I I :! / Ace ACR TYPE rrt 'x- N) TP s -X,a y �IIQ O PVN FM U o Erg PI / iC d `(iYP) ( .) NIU CM / �I I rnosswwi� I 1 12 ail d .I ACR. b fiulnsR pm.l �. a Y .Y. �10 7-aA ;�''if_ - �EASiNG Ww BE KIIOJ� To PUNTER Eb50. I5. 2Fn' r AIXE55 BI I a xtia E n aIILCMR �0 � AmNNN. MM � BE �- (� 1 - PLANTER To°U— _ MNF£ LJ E UUJIX IT5 Atli p 1HE Iwp£FIY IXESS y K wA rNEN E RN1s AND I_ I.� I 112 i3 m '. I sR.E15 PRPNFU er KfM[9NxEttNS fN11nID'NN16 r a m W AT YAIm N 1GM16 SfNnq➢,9RON CO..NY AAIm uru ID. ow NO'9Axfl'iW NFAI ara]il Nc. � � I L. GWCRETE PLAIfeRY � v I � A AT YATRn1pL nlN Q StlInItlO.9IrU%�NY OAIm tlG I.. HANMNL A. I IYO ]IIL' 140' I.lN5 R)11E ELSING WURdS Ma tN5 PJH H BI U Atli I ' ACNN FN➢9N1EY PERFORMEDar vN1ASY NY819X511N. rxN Ex*.a ami BULDNO ATEA I t xG On u.Ar s nµ J)uu 91E IS 4XIN1 As LG15 1.z e ni.2a R9 k]0 a 111E Ln I 19,467 38F. I ' auuNTY a arFaM AaY40P5 uw: asnNT IBDR,acne tw, aw \ 1 ,-IEL0.'AlE INUMC .Ap SIGNS AS WIRED 4)ur M.APFA W L415 1.21.Ill.'Ib.]91.1015 7.w 17 14 PYA w - v(veN.wXsl YwL j (1.) I 5)nE 91E CESOXao N IUY 5IE5 pirfLY"Ifs am:x O NImx9M Mh YPPDR 9f µULAN.NY. rmn WO �., we Nwy ? RI z z4II f. lRAA1 EHCL09.ME�.. �-A tli IIPE's' I �I ]810.TMnittn5NNI0l PNFL WBIi x G.YN'xU19AI.y ouc e10 (SEE DETAIL) / bl,YL AC65S®E CURBRNvs 90U.a Eolrrm WW mmNCAnn Pn,,o d Bernd Develapmme ♦cv it _ PROPagn VERRM h unutt PaE AA6(W arwsl. mE 'e'- . 1 ,o - PRNPACTdI Block 2,ra.1,2,4,2].1,2&30 IN a��ACR TPE 'R D-800 q1 CWPAETCRWDE FENCE Nc L (r1P.) PAV(SEE DETNLS) 10. x�U .M DTNL I 2CN(G TABLEMelli4dr.'1'mw ofNOWhoN a a NAwcuTPmnQl a s°a°u:c4,xewrNk tN __, zaE e,ANY eAoi Nle R-w r 1 � I b ry �(m.7 xxwasfn us[NETK Imam numEu 6ne Plm 0.rncw �' I `< I I.K Loi sff ]11ao0 ar, nem1 5FRI- - M) �/,C � fl5-1 IA. Mmi SERAM 1M.Q ]SE. N�,Apparei fmC�®m IE 'Y' 9GIDEE p1A➢ 100.0' 46M1 4, (E (( ° ..EINE 100.8 Fcx I + r I is s s m ss W. Layout and O5U ac. '1PE 'E I b A IAi N0n1 `.O Y 2' tlVNING IN WRa LDFDWR pO^K, .�, _ I YAM aD� IEMi 1 sfuEs- i Y-zB W ro ALLow NNAGE I R .5 1. Materials Plan D �. •pxS11X6 NOIICMFUXIIG FFAnIE PARM TABLE b FT STW(N]E� ZUi B.Nq RAM PORMN OF 91E N-w FENCE YATa F PAm E➢'.E OF IPNENi mmGsio usE IEna /'T /1 - NELaED PIIULdm 1. L REna e 1 sP - Ts ' m® w.xmXNe z,a SfAI£x EFLi M1WlIM Iv sWw irOWw � IIYww�rwtwr� Iww°`�ee�mn M.4 �.� �°'�yl�lwrl ��}}}yyy � ti w® E'nginmingd Sur�iwg,P.0 �rwwsm�. m�umM f'ew � O y m®wrx®smE Fyrum�mm°u�l senor vim >°� ISY 25Fow �.`"°'o �aow. :wr..e w.e,oo m, RvplvtH°Nbe ec r T � � � / R E�elyee TrtePbel� 1 Irzml/ane ° �°ar ;o.°.� w f w.ww im.l 1dtG#ddl1�L �I P frlr _ 'w. � .uoJ 1 ^or �trem`wr�w+w.wi; w.rw.swiw..�r tw mw e.ue�w i r sMM¢ wxam� PROPOSED CVS _ w.nsx allpmr e•R•• R. ed RefiOeeapm Um4" _� 2,Lb 1,2,4,271, 30 nf.mb�,r�orswln°w f � M sea'att co,trew r� 1 Ine Srte Plm Rcvi x ° - 1 - �n Nmormm�nmm w 1 rvw,nu ' Lmdscape Pim F ]o C-6 N K E® ° n:m""mra�•• vmu �mm�wanl..ruawl_wrwa C\25085\cad\Id\planset\25DB5—PLOT ALT dwg �\\}� ��=•%��'1 / - 1 �� °µrye 9� / f [°.y L, m / � � CURB RAMP (TYPE k� 5\v�W "F ' � / o „ / / WITH 4' LANDI //` H / Engineering & Surveying, P.C. EMO\ E G AR RAIL Transportation ASS U,I Land Development 25 I l i "r Environmental Services TRAFFIC °µwk ♦.�° ,r'1 / 301 Nott StCet JUNCl10P1 8PF l ID r - - \ . R. >7 i _/ Wit, SEE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Schenectady,NY 12305 BOX ❑ �j _y w ._ r'Ubt'` __%° "2-•-� I `\ PLAN FOR LIMIT OF WORK 518 370 8602 a FAX 5183708606 SVgv � .J,AC �i � /� .� - / \AND DETAILS owners: ADWAY IMPROVEMEN F Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4) FOK ;W �� n _ °�' � Gi OR LIMIT OF W � ; A D DETAILS NorthforkBowlInc. (Lots 2,28, 29) P S E DUNN ENGINEERIN UO V \ / Mattitack Realty Associates (Lot 27.1) hr' „ C� !' I I P ANS FOR CURB RAM " / / i�' i F 5'Q I I TO ALLOW D E 0'-3^ NortbforkProperties Inc.,ILC (Lots 1, 30) / r` > 4" OPENING I RB A REPLACEMENT AND �� / ° • �V �' s; 0 "X12'-0" PROVIDE sTL. RECEIVER / OF -_ •-iFc/C t/' C�',OSSWALK �� j.�` GR�C �h WhLY' ` ^ O J LC I I CONC. APRON 10'-0" SLEEVE SET IN GONG. AT Applicant: HT REALIGNMENT b - 6° " ARr, TAI CLEAR GATE OPENING CANE BOLT Laker Development Group,LLC i SUS, _ is' % I P M LfN / •� -IL "V `�/ 6EN� FOLr �C q �F�" ,> _ I� 2" WE GALV PIPE GATE r,�, � Sign Summary GUAI �\ W/ WELDED FRAME b `J 0 DEDICATION I G _ _� �! ( i i M.U.T.C.D. 1 IH TO OF MONUMENT SIGN ' _ _ "� i +� I / -��i ° - $ '/ j I 4° Width cHeia t Desc. ' � (. 'I \ ; T r `�- y l Number SOU LD Al AC) (SEE DETAIL) GSC QCt E BASS `!; � �% �` '¢�� ACR ( ) - ., 1,% TYP M" 3" E II cALv. CONT �✓�� ' ,- , �J f GATE POSTS I I I I R1-1 30" 30' ' �o_j3 i\ E ,P — ` SIT I s'-lo 9 SONr, G`R'AVEL r- II + C YP1= $' co LPA .K EN OACHCI-PIT %'- FA LE I I 6" THICK SEALED /! 550P /orb .D1 \ nn SSE CU B 1 9 '„EA _ I I GONG PAD G SEE ^ CC ( _ o'L , 13'-4° DWGS FOR GRADE R3-1 24' 42' P? yi FOR ALL CR” ) 9,0 c:,GIc.P. ,.aowA CC �� . (�YPE 3A) ( u DERI' vEMEN_ _ ELEVATIONS P" � � - - TR Ilf a ' �- ' - — — — `� o 0 6'_2" 3 -1 1/2 LINE POSTS TRUCKS � ti, I -- ACR ACR TYPE "'H"" -ow� BQX - ''t- - ---- . ,�NU ( FOUiJD C- (n 1 FOR pl!Ioru �� a 1 ( I OVERNEAu Y'IRE SEE ROADWAYM ROVE ENT, ` GAS a R7-8 R7-8 ��' I � 0 I 13 C -3 R3-z za 4z' PLAN FOR LI IT WO K , I METER TT I /� 0 9.0 9.0" (TYP.) (TYP.) J R \5 AND DETAILS _ 1 I ° CROSSW _ \°R _-1 I I 6" BOLLARD ( YP.) c I J CRI TRUCKS j zgr.� 75 TYP „M., ` � _S -- � I � 88 b WATER R7-8A 12'-0^ R4-7 24- 30- k4 T WIDO MEfE - - r , + - Iii. F`PLANTLR TO rn STOCI.A E i BE I ' r DEMOLISH11 14ashEnclosure Plan PARGKIN 300 N.T.S. R7-e MENT KO{Sp iXISTI G SI 24.8 / BUILDI G 0 II i a; �(II ARCS DWGS.) �T L a I NOTES: E3E DE OL SHE r G s G,v NGT^/888--- --- --- = - - I I y ". 4E C PA � PUNTER'An SETBACK. (1O ; F-=T1 � \ 1) THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND BE DEMOLISHED ACR --I�� }) 3 12.7"t 5_ 3.0 ham., E? v z I SURVEYS PREPARED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS ENTITLED ""PLAN OF aH V m _ fTl : R7-9A 12• 6" ACCE4IBIE PROPERTY AT MAITITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY' �` Im _ Enp_ i ;i 1 hid 1' ; i � Co!dc f -I DATED MAR. 20, 1996 AND -SURVEY FOR NORTH FORK BOWL, INC. CONCRETE` PLATFORMJ =" i 3 �v IPIN AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" DATED DEC. s h I \ [� ( o; �d , , 1L � I IN ANDRAIL �� /c� /' 8.0� 19.0" 30.0 19.0` � �' `�. 1, 1995. a cvs canMENTs a/z/O5 z c Y z I AC�>,," I p I y' 2) THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AN 7 STAM AND TO INSAP COMMENTS a/tt/os s 1 v z / B ( ` I Q L- r Y h ' ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTUN, s TONNSHIP COMMEN S 8/5/04 v "' ��OSED `•'V`S '/ 1 ) o INC. ON MAY 6 AND OCT. 8, 2003. �` - °.- D �` ,— Ll R • �m 5 TOWSHIP COMk1ENT5 7/15/04 z F' BUILDING RESP) 1 m I _�- ��;' ' C i + L j �/ 7 0 I� P _ f 3) THE SITE IS SHOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 ON THE RE SIGNS PER NYSDOT CONIMENts 6/18/04 EL L• 1114 7 + r ? ti COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ASSESSORS MAP: DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 143, 5/ta/D4 �� T /�, L" \' 1 BLOCK 2. s REMSIONS PER NYSDOT COMMENTS r )€ n. � BUILD ! �\•� ( ,' � � l � � T n / � OCATE AFFIC 4 i I I _ - - l % � reams w+mem DE MUTHan cowuo,s /1/04 s m p PAINTED r, ' NS A ' UIRED 4) THE TOTAL AREA OF LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 IS 77,801 a/ta/D4 �! D" C n i PAVEMENT REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 1 �-� , - r / J F ) _ S.F. (1.7861 ACRES) No Revision Date PPvd me I VALLEYBA L1 4 _ _ :1 c� i - r I I I G (NP") C 5) THE SITE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 5 LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN ZONE X (AREA DeSgned by DMC Dea"a °y DMC Check.. by MWJ CD i Y „M„ DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN) AS SHOWN ON CAD cM1ecketl by pproved by G CD / ° THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY, DMC MWJ R1-1 -• same 1„=20' Dae 1/19/04 R3-2 m TRASH ENCLOSURE / COMMUNITY NUMBER 360813 PANEL 0481 SUFFIX G, MAP NUMBER TI J Pmgct Title 24.0” 17. ' i - - o ACR TYPE '"B"' 36103CO481 G, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4, 1998. 701 (SEE DETAIL) / RELOE `TE UTILITY POLE 6) ALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TRUNCATED Proposed Retail Developement 2 11vF R , ,, C FpP' ^' - �- _. _ -------PROPOSED` VERTICAL -_ o DOMES (SEE DETAILS). e g -- .� y - o Block 2 Lots 1 2 4 27.1 28-30 TYPE . " II I � ' - tC MP-ACT, , MODEL j 2 / ' �� ACR T f�E 'B �Oi��g OOMPACTOR s ROVIDE FENCErS R' l II I n r; Q 7-3.51 . 10.5' N COMPACTOR,� ' TAIL � 7 7 Mattituckjown of Southold 3 BOLLARD (TYP.) PAD (SEE DETAILS) C . �, ZONING TABLE OE PIT a n A OUND PERIM`iEh1� OF __ 1 c ~' m °- o S SAWC ZONE: B, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 Suffolk CO., NOW York E, � F =2n 82` :T7 - O Issued for / T20'I- '12.0' _ (TYP. m PROPOSED USE: RETAIL 1, REQUIRED PROVIDED L �r -�' n e - I MIN. LOT SIZE 30,000 S.F. 77,8011 S.F. Site Plan Review f4k ( �`' cv - - - R1-1 Ro j FRONT SETBACK N.Y. S.R. 25 100.0' 75.6'* Not Approved for Construction SIGSBEE ROAD 100.0" 98.1'* O.nwng rue A _ �_ Y ' E CC .0 3.0" I�I MARLENE LANE 100.0" 88.8'+ 4"' iLLOW LINE SCR Z� ) REAR SETBACK 35" 33.5' _ , � _ ® ��' as Layout and TYPE MIN. LOT WIDTH 150" 285'1 �ADINtGDOCK a — — — o MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 2 STORIES-35" 1 STORY-26 J''I; - E 2005 MAX. LOT COVERAGE 0.3 0.191 Materials Plan ��.0 - - - - _ ' � MAX. BLDG. WIDTH* 60" 100't _ r �n I * EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FEATURE °- ,�0 4v � --- - _ - , r 4 bTOC'ADEE,, �b9 W. . q n°�a to E a PARKING TABLE RD GE J( �' r J Drawing Number ' -� 'J 4 �n - +- + / 6 FT STOCKADE --I „ I ZONE: B. AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 ;' ,N \ MATCH EXISTING 0 PROPOSED USE: RETAIL e�'p99tjF NE Er`o FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT T � z � C-/� \ - �S 2 i n 1 REQUIRED PROVIDED �.. + rrl = C, n RETAIL ® 1 SPACE 200 S.F. 75 85 - �-, ` = Sheet of HANDICAPPED 5% TOTAL 4 4 g'' - _ 2 10 20 0 20 40 Michael W.Junghaos P-,bt Number rlJ \+ I 1 N Y. Professional Engineer � SCALE IN FEET N0.072072 25085 �..\25085\cad\ld\plaoset\25085_PLOT TRUCK.dwg L:\25085\cad\Id\ploneet\25085—PLOT ALT.dw9 j � I i re-4 d h.�l CDN• 5\DEWP`K ❑„gam Engineering & Surveying, P.C. MNF 6 2'I°` Transportation w goo6cDND Land Development \,S.Iz• 25 p;URB---RAMP (T PE A) Environmental Services TRAFFIC CMIN i `- 301 Nott Street 9PR / f�� 0�' SEE ROADWAY IMPROV ENT e xenoN � SSD ,w � �` 6\\� R• ❑H PLAN FOR LIMIT OF W RK Schenectady,NY 12305 PR W\OIN PV oNw/ / / AND DETAILS 518 370 8602 a FAX 518 370 8606 ❑NADWAY IMPROVE EN 1RREC0� i Wei ' �' G Owners: w maw P N FOR LIMIT OF WO K y SWC /a” ` Rq/t Robert Cbispetta (Lot 4) A D DETAILS i ' '\ DyL � � w � Notthfork Bowl Inc. (Lots 2,28, 29) K cD S E DUNN ENGINEERIN 4 sp� MattittukRealty Associates (Lot 27.1) Ew P� Co Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) CDN S\D PANS FOR CURB RAM SFR ��`` 10'-3' REPLACEMENT AND / j �0r grEE/ 0$U"X12'-0" li PROVIDE STL. RECEIVER TRAFpjC C OSSWALK f!� GRASS " RICK WPB C�ARp I ONC. APRON 10'-0' SLEEVE SET IN CONC. AT Applicant: Uo� /ICyTSU R ALIGNMENT ��9" 6 P g�H Rq CLEAR GnTE OPENING CANE BOLT Laker Development Group,LLC /gC 00 \x/ N : SrF BENCH Pp/E 3'rZS � `� 2" O.D. GALV. PIPE GATE /Nf C fL —.- 56 �l a W/ WELDED FRAME Sign Summat'y 0 DEDI ;ATION4 C _ UgRO Rql _ °18'10"E_ _ _ _ _ 56• / Sec' cation 4a M.U.T.C.D.T.0 D. P Desc. T 0 0 MONUMENT SIGN rte" \ - �� _ I Nb� Width Height (SEE DETAIL) r pp:E., BASS \ 1 5.34 SOU LD 0 1 AC) 6 — TYP "M" ACR 3" 0 D. (II GALV) SW 5. BIT. CO \ CC I GATE POSTS • 1 5'-10' R1-1 30" 30" ' E P — — BIT, Sw� mow/ p m e Yp� "B'= — PA K EN(OACH NT — PA N 6" THICK SEALED $P r 'L5 cc 19 i AREA CONC. PAD — SEE 50P SSE CU B V 13'-4' DWGS. FOR GRADE 2 S R3-1 24" 42" I r a ADWA CC ) VGC C . FOR ALL ACRS: ) \ C NC.R — — — — Itv I ELEVATIONS 4 ® -' B ( YPE 3A / 1 — — UNDERP VEMEIJ /�/e, — — — — — — — — — — — �NO E� JT FOUND to I ~ I cc'i n _ I TRAF U a '� �° � n - - LINE POSTS ) F 2" O.D. 16 GA. � 6' 2" 3' 1 1/2' TRUCKS BOX I . 0.0' - --- - h � ACR TYPE H R �;OR DVERHEAD WIRE �� O I I SEE ROADWA OVE ENT GAS ' tt. / (TYP.) R a L 1'-3 R3-2 24" 42" PLAN FOR LIAI WO£K METER I -5' Blr ° _ _ �- AND DETAILS I o \i // D� q eNC \£ CR 6' 6'-0" 6'-0` 6" BOLLARD (TYP.) TRUCKS T I � € I Z ' YF ,.M., �111 R7_8 ® E °gyp° 88.6" �,- ® ` T _ I 12'-0" r R7-8A 4 G 0 r R4-7 24" 30" PLATER PL NTEh TO It- STOCKA E / BE DEMOLISHED TrashEnclosureP XISTI G MENT A`d�ESS �` I RfSin ERVEN ��. EN S/j C 3/0(1 ! N.T.S. PARKING R7—e 12" 18" UILDI G 0 ARCS DWGS) EXISTING WOOD ACR TYPE "H" PgPENC I' NOTES: DE OL SHED12 11 1 1) THE P 6PERTY JNES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND r n Pq1 Q PLANTER TO 4�' z 0 BE DEMOLISHED ACR SURVE 5 PREPARED BY PECONIC SURVEYOR; EhTI?!.F.D "PIAN OF R7-8A 1_" S. vs O U "� ACCESSBIf n PROPE TY AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY' EDP EN Dollc. n 3 DATED �fAR. 20; 1996 AND "SURVEY FOR NORTH FORK BOWL, INC. E r — CONCRETE PLATFORM ?� v o AT MA TITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" DATED DEC. = o i°' 1, 199 a HANDRAIL---.,--, Z 2) THE EX TING CI)NDTONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AN a STATE pN T HIP M 3/1/05 s I I : . I - ACTUA FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, s TOWN HIP COMMENTS a/s/°a ACRz o U ` PROPOSED CVS i ° INC. 0 1 MAY 6 AND OCT. 8, 2003. x/15/0+ i f 5 TOWNSHIP M 15 n (NJl ` "'% r '• BUILDING AREA ♦ ■ I • 3) THE SI IS SHOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 ON THE 4 REVISIONS PER NYS❑OT COMMENTS 8/18/04 " �+ COUNT) OF SUFFOLK ASSESSORS MAP: DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 143, Tj H 14,467 ±8F. S 3 RENSIONS PER NYSO❑T COMMENTS 5/18/04 BLOCK 2. e .' . 2 aEN91°N9 Ppi MMN pI SCMIWD COYYEIIIS 4/1/04 4) THE TOTAL AREA OF LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 IS 77,801 / REVISIONS R CVS COMMENTS 3/1 8 04 4. - , 17 S.F. (1.7861 ACRES) No. PER ❑M ❑me ppva "'110 r V 1-LEYBA L14 ' r �AR 1 R 5) THE SIE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 5 LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN ZONE X (AREA Des1g"°d °y DMC °raven by DMC cb.pwea by MWJ I P "M" DETER INED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN) AS SHOWN ON cp❑ °b.pnad br DMC Approval by MWJ I I THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY, R1-1 . • a COMMU ITY NUMBER 360813 PANEL 0481 SUFFIX G, MAP NUMBER Be-" 1"--201Inc'* 1/19/04 I R3-2 TRASH ENCLOSURE 36103 0481 G, EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4, 1998. Project It. 2 (SEE DETAIL) n 20.1 / 6) ALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH TRUNCATED Proposed Retail Developement e2 C. HO PROPOSED VERTICAL I DOMES (SEE DETAILS). Block 2 Lots 1 2 4 27.1, 28-30 ) ACR TYPE > D-800 CTOR MODELONN COMPACTOR cc Blr Roti ZONING TABLE ' ' ' ' CO/VC Mattituckjown of Southold PAD (SEE DETAILS) � • �% PAIE R SHOE P r ' Suffolk Co., New York a A ING DOCK BO ARD (TY P.) 1 ZONE: B, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 PROPOSED IUSE: RETAIL °°"°d '°r I o CC a _ - a, 88'8 I z REQUIRED PROVI D ry cc ' MIN. LOT ZE 30,000 S.F. 77 801± a Plan Review m R1-1 R a FRONT SETBACK 0 0 1 ` Z o o ' '` R3-1 }\ TYTE M. I r SIGSBEE 25 100.0' 75.6'. Not Approved for Construction I m n MARLEN 'ROAD 100.0' 98.1'* or°wing nu° o f m w �d c \onn/4i ulup �" _gSS, dll,°, (,`C 3Nnuiv LANE 100 0' 88.8'* o 'a < s`° _ �m,lwo x((119 l-/Sc0 o ... "111 '� \`' mWp,'"e,11 • uem„ / ypupU, " I REAR SET CK 35' 33.5' ayout and 'g'CR """"" %,SII `=°` MIN. LOT IDTH 150 285't m I I o �� iivn mn ` _ _ _ ^,Om,�_ uunuy +y. apnWy'4ni ` �- U a z PIPE p01„w a ,, I „ ”" -- l °'""' °\ MAX. BLD HEIGHI' 2 STORIES-35 1 STORY-26 1 ':• '� e "" ..Op," „ a..1 MAX. LOT OVERAGE 0.3 0.191 Materials Plan ,c s "„p ” oun, U `,110"GG,11 '\ ;'/„01 = .� 4 ” _ _ _ _ _ 1 MAX. BLDG. WIDTH»+ 60' 1 100'± EXISTING ON-CONFORMING FEATURE S69'20'50'"W I f 1 STOCKADE 569'20'56"Wm m PARKING TABLE 1 520'39'10 E o y p 1 ❑rowing Number FENCE 5.54 ZONE: B, ND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 6 FT STOCKADE MATCH EXISTING------F5—o I `, Oti NEW r FENCE EDGE OF PAVEMENT o I PROPOSED USE: RETAIL ��ti,.• U /� = O0 r = G o Mi E I I REQUIRED PROVIDED 77 Z 1 RETAIL ® 1 SPACE 200 S.F. 75 85 ;� V N' 0 1 HANDICAPPED 5% TOTAL 4 4 °;Og 1 `2 ' Sheet l2 0110 1 z �' I 20 0 20 40 Mio ro 11 1 Project Number M I ( N.Y. Prol ill^ ng�ire.r 25085 I O No.072072 :I 1 IZ SCALE IN FEET 111 \...\25085\cad\ld\planset\25085 PLOT TRUCE L.\25085\cad\Id\pl.,s.t\25085_PLOT.dw9 o..�. -il'1 , , / ,'.,Y.,•r-';_,,, - - ,�' µ,'PQ., - - , J01111z �e e „I, x '-�� ` I , Engineering & Surveying, P.C. err 7 , r r �fiv�° dry ;I I I � l l / J -V , - -" daft Transportation _ D t Land Development -f Environmental Services R P (Try 3A) _ I 301 Nott Street JUGA: 1:Irl I.T�}- W.�, ✓j - „ � � J., �� AIJ. l� l WB 50 - - I I \'- Sch ecy,NY 6UT � -4 - �• _ � �� II� 518�708602FAX SO1g 3708606 v I ,)J,I - Cr SEE ROADWAY IMPROVE EN ( �1 Owners: P N FOR LIMIT OF WO K - (,) , u / - �T ,, i ti 11r - l _- Robert Chiapetta (Lot 4 AND DETAILS :, - \ ) % - _ _ - E1v11ROVEMI.FNTS TO ABUTTNCiI I II NorthforkBowl Inc. (Lots 2, 28,29) � _TOWNSHIP ARK NJILJ RE PER 11 VV EE D')^/ I PROVE-MEN S\ E VAP /'ilT" y 0't' i OF UTk'LD R MENDATIONS MattituckRealtyAssociates (Lot27.1 R PLACE EXISTING CU B ,- Dc I Al�D D II ,OF WORK ) t6'-3° Northfork Properties Inc.,LLC (Lots 1, 30) - `Iy R MP WITH CURB RAM ! - «c, �\ ; '' _ / I v` - lL I l 10 b X12 -0" / PROVIDE STL RECEIVER ( YPE 2A) - -� ��fiq =_ --QF�� I, 1Jf!\'- .-T LiI I��I ' ( rl"{d - CONC. APRON -/ 10'-0" SLEEVE SET IN CONC, AT Applicant: ; ' -\ ' r ;EI" Laker Development Group,LLC - " \ %r7� P CLEAR GATE OPENING CANE BOLT �� U �- 2' O,D CALM. PIPE GATE W WELDED FRAME Tim ROP SEb DEDI }ATIO %J GL(_) ,I", - o At /amu' - - - f,E r{q -f'J%CA'°I r, "I IiN•f' ) 1 _ f ' \ 9\r l' 'F j, + I .I L A I / =- O �wl �TOVdN 0 L(.J 1 OI��MENT-SIGN o �— �r�c_/ '�- - - 77 q S E AIL) ` L . 5 tiflJ„-' -� - �' >._ - _ �, EEpT SOUTdbLD- 0.0g1 I� FL1F (1 I, r�A � - w - /I Sign Summary �r , � _ -1 .. : p� , 14J' II CJfIVr_' 1+� cc - � tL JI-fes _ �__ GATE POSTS ALV.) S eeification P �i)I- E � �,r��o ; 1 _ -- - - -- - __ - - — - . - - v n - _ _ _ 5 esc. ' 1 - o l 10" M.U.T.C.D. P D � ,,, Number Width Height CR- YPE' __ _ � -_ _- -- 22 o P.{bC- G I_ 1 6" THICK SEALED Q. , - - ' o - - CONC. PAD - SEE ■ O - ,I U;.f?f DWGS.TFOR GRADE _ V � cc �q (, F RAL ACR 90' I. FP/,�Chlrl-T " a'-4° VGI ��(D PRESSE G B R1-1 30" 30" T`1/ tS'L� , `, 9 ) _ - - - ", .. .I( ELEVATIONS R ,,iir B P, ( ,YPE 3A) �L P� o - _ -- 0I c� I Ih'r ILI' � - _� //_-n \ N ' I 3 -1 1/2 LINE POSTS R3-2 24" 24" i n. 1v m�tl •I 0 R TH9.DFIJ I,�-F /r - -� A IN TYPE H" „y - - - � / J., ' d G lhl; SEE ROADWA fU ROVE ENT ` �;qg �� .'IINS_ R7-8 ° � ` 4° ACR I O - - PLAN FOR LI I WORK MLTEG =5 b1r 9.0' (yTYP.) "' R `2I -3 AND DETAILS r L. o�N_ � �Y M R4-7 24" 30" � I �- - �I'E \ _ '`H�1, 6" BOLLARD (TYP.) - r,n�l a�a, TAP +ur �T PJ/ � P 5° I _ I f} � r= " ' 'E"Eo - PARKING 1N'47CR R7-8 - - r El - R7-8 12" 16" ci �n T r z ter cc �a '6D--/ 2,_6. F - TAX DL(�l h a7 MLI R - R7-8A EXI�TIFJG, W ODf LOT 1 —7, - - � 18.1 _ P-11 �kll fFF _. I PLANTEf� T ^ - - -- - sTGCUA C BE DEMOLI HED.: ,� TrasbEEnclosarePlan vne PJ fvIOR FI-1 F(JRI`. R7-8A 12" 6" / XISTI G 5�0 `,' 24.8' ., �I� F �m -=' `? uL� I, nccess!e¢ c CEMENT AL-ESS n J EN 3roo N.T.S. FRUFEFTIE_' EIDE OL'SHED ( ' ARQfI iDWGS.) .l_.- PiL' IRY O _,FTEAi,I J11J0 FI ? 0 XGT-ING -WOOS- ---ACR TYP Ji4 1ERT�T' � y�l NOTES: BE DEMOLISHED ACR 11 -" 12.7' A.q 3.q' �� 1) THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN WERE TAKEN FROM PLANS AND le,' \ SURVEYS PREPARED BY PECONIC SURVEYORS ENTITLED ""PLAN OF EO E � cilu_, °; I PROPERTY AT MATT TUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" o0I CONCRETE PLATFORM N 1.• „ tsi, �) 1 DATED MAR. 20, 1996 AND "SURVEY FOR NORTH FORK BOWL, INC. TA Cl I �'. r � ) n -0, �� li m 34z T�; - AT MATTITUCK, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK CO., NY" DATED DEC. u HANDRAIL e.o' 3 .0' 1s:o° N� _ 1, 1995. LMT _ _ I �� a1 y F) - ACR `' c 2) THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FROM AN M I � r \ N %F PROPOSED CVS 1 r �I T ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY PERFORMED BY VANASSE HANGEN BRUSTLIN, n r - 1 6 a FORK 1N�. �� I 7.0' g /� �.', a, NC. ON MAY 6 AND OCT. 8, 2003. BUILDING AREA =n y 4 r 4 RENSIONS PER NYSaOT COMMENTS 6/18/04 �h _ I �' 3) THE SITE IS SHOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 ON THE 17 NC 14,467 +SF. B L�A (TYP.) I' j/i COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ASSESSORS MAP: DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 143, D REb510N6 PER N SGOT COMMENTS 5/18/04 L'r11- �� X� _ BLOCK 2 V REASONS PER roan or SOMODD .14RI 4/1/04 m PR 0 D VERTICAL EI CR ,,/ � ^� I 1-' '70 TYPE I, M� 4 THE TOTAL AREA OF LOTS 1, 4, 27.1, 28, 29 & 30 IS 77,801 REVISIONS PER CVS COMMENTS 3/18/04 Z7 l-• ,1' ) N. Reviled note sped T CO A OR MO L ° v I_ ErI AL , D- 0 N S.F. (1.7861 ACRES) TAX BLOCK 2 e; • T— - AREA - / '°el a by 'down by cracked by LOTS 1 , 2, 4, 27.1 , 28, 29 & 0--, - CO A R PAD + 5) THE SITE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 5 U ENTIRELY WITHIN ZONE X (AREA ' nbe°kadDMC DMC b MWJ DEED AREA: 77,801 SQ. FT. c, (S E°' TA LS) ; DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-Y R FLOODPLAIN) AS SHOWN ON by DMC r MWJ 1 /y '--- p R1-11/ �I (1 .7861 ACRES) , 'r THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FO SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY, s`°'° 1"=20' 0a4° 1/19/04 17 2YI / COMMUNITY NUMBER 360813 PANE Project Tale m COM L 04 SUFFIX G MAP NUMBER - BE c � 24.0` O .1d. P- I� -__ 3610300481 G EFFECTIVE DATE MAY 4 98. - c ,rr - Proposed Retail Development ,+ I II - P I pr. r I TYPE ' I e R wR^ - ��, r -- - - - -- - - — - - i Block 2, Lots 1, 2, 4, 27.1, 28-30 �. \I E �C) ZONING TABLE = - n Mattituck Town of Southold o .0 ' r ZONE: 8, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 , N - LOADING DOCK - _ _I �� sRne PIT -- Fr- : (SEE ARCH. DWGS.) `�,.., I / PROPOSED USE: RETAIL Suffolk Co., New York P _ EN-' - lee°ed for p' Ea REQUIRED P OVID - - - - o" a- - - CC R� - A(�R I III . MIN. LOT SIZE 30 000 S.F. .8011 S. ews�o- Qy �l/f�c55�c,.,�Cs CC (;(JI C o t. ° .°� r7] FRONT SETBACK TY E "M" I Site Plan Review r , PAD 2 .0' ,5;; - I 143.0' � R1-1 ■�� l I z N.Y. S.R. 25 100.0' 1 ` - _ SIGSBEE ROAD 100.0' 98.1'* �' . T RLAO�' Y.ARTI y` 7 } MARLENE LANE 100.0' 88.8'* Not Approved for Construction EI 1J(� Z TA '1L 111 L. EJC1 , P ° ' R SH; NCLOSURE 'rewln True n ' , '( ' r �'�� ) / I' , l•, LR'IC; I (�-SEE' DE�AIL) S.O 3.0' REAR SETBACK 35' 45.6' mY `� LCI 1 .T -U', 1 „ - - MIN. LOT WIDTH 150 285'± � ,� r'F VIA f �I II li'I' nF.P,I-11' r, , � - MAX. BLDG. HEIGHT 2 STORIES 35 1 STORY-26 L out and F /r',L'L ❑, T (� ��-�� "�.�'), _ a' ` FOP 1 MAX. LOT COVERAGE 0.3 0.19± 3 ' _ • -� o MAX. BLDG. WIDTH** 60" - 100'± 14f C� _ ��';T, * EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FEATURE ' _ Ma rials Plan ( � s - - - - - - - - T1 �4Y-' �j i I .� — — r PARKING TABLE � ,, _ (OCI.: DE , ,9 )0 r_0`` I FENCE r J{ U"Jy" ;LJ V_ � -'- � Im v I _ �" ��^- 1I ZONE: B, AND BACK PORTION OF SITE R-40 444�otouotao,yn„ 0rnwiny Number L.-*. E'LU'_ ' - MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED USE: RETAIL �,a ,XEOFA/pyj; ,,� -1 �P .....'w ...... .y 's EDGE OF PAVEMENT mosey �y g �_� Fl TAY BLOCI; L �. LUl ._� y _ - REQUIRED PROVIDED -'* � �`= H /F I_ I'- E-LO TTE H IJH',I`, I � � � RETAIL ® 1 SPACE 200 S.F. 75 83 'il ,r� 1J T LOT 5 � 1 HANDICAPPED 5% TOTAL 4 4 � `,,�� 2 =��, � S @ea of \ P',I %F MARIE A DRAI F %s�yo : z 10 nu1L EN• . m 1 20 D 20 40 Michael W.Jun N.Y. Profienstoro ghan5 Proje25Oct Number \\ SCALE IN FEET No. 0720721 Engineer 25085 ' \...\25085\cad\ld\planset\25085_PLOT TRUCK.dwg SOUTHOLD VILLAGE MERCHANTS PO Box 1356 Southold, NY11971 765-4100 This is to let you know of a Southold Town Planning Board Meeting, to be held MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 at 5:00 pm at TOWN HALL. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss ways to regulate formula retail business in our town. We all know that CVS would like to establish a store in the hamlet. NOW IS THE TIME FOR US TO VOICE OUR CONCERN TO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS. 5cc�z a � ass Page 1 of 1 Terry, Mark From: Houteast@aol.com Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 11:11 AM To: Terry, Mark Subject: (no subject) Dear Sir: This is to express my total oposition to the construction of a CVS pharmacy anywhere within the hamlet of Southold. How anyone could conceive of such a structure within steps of one of the oldest histroric districts in the state, belies any form of common sense. If a CVS were to be constructed at the proposed location, it would not only ruin the character of the hamlet, but would pose a serious traffic problem. I doubt if New York State would permit entry and exit onto Main Road, and therefore this would be relegated to the side street, Wells Ave. Picture a vehicle exiting from the Bank of New York drive-in window onto Wells Ave. at the same time vehicles were to be turning south onto Wells Ave. from Main Road (to enter the parking lot of CVS) . These vehicle(s)would then in turn have to contend with cars entering and exit the CVS lot. What the result would be is clear: GRIDLOCK on Main Road. The location is simply too tight and inaccessable for that type of"quick in-quick out' operation. You have the power to block the construction of this type of operation or any similar project or in the least,present roadblocks to it's construction until legislation can be created if necessary to block such projects.THIS WHAT PLANNING IS ALL ABOUT !! Thank you, Barry T. Charles 265 Peck Place Southold, NY 765-5216 9/12/2005 p3 ►3S. v«. 210 Sigsbee Road Mattituck, N.Y. 119,52 February 1 , 2-606 Harras Bloom & Archer LLP Attorneys at Law ; 445 Broad Hollow Road " Suite 127 Melville, New York 11747-3601 Attention: Keith H. Archer �� D Reference: CVS Pharmacy, Route 25 Mattitu;ck O ` 2r,06 Dear Mr. Archer: , I called your office regarding the CVS offer\ t provi s�6 sa;r with landscaping to enhance my property. To\da v ray " received any reply. The day I called I spoke wit qW girl and stated that I 'd like some blue spruce ilar to those being planted at CVS . She advised me thw r you would get back to me. This was also the first day I noticed that landscaping had started at CVS . I hope that you and CVS were sincere with your promise . I await your reply. Sincerely, Mr ret Ann Noone MAN/ph P.S. I am enclosing a copy of your letter of 8/2/04 regarding landscaping. P.S .S . I 've also noted that delivery ramp & entrance has been relocated to back of building. This was not in the agreed plan, the back of building was ONLY for exit driveway for delivery trucks. Please explain how this happened. cc: kJerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town Planning Board Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer President, CVS Pharmacy exc y mx STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OFFICE BUILDING SUBIMAL CHAKRABORTI, P.E. 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY THOMAS J. MADISON, JR. REGIONAL DIRECTOR HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 COMMISSIONER April 4, 2006 Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179, Southold, NY 11971 APR 7 2006 Building Department Attn: Michael J. Verity Reference: New York State Department of Transportation F ��or"-'Permit#1�0, for Ja-To Building Contractors Inc, to "Reconstruct and Permanently Maintain" side walk , curb, pavement markings and ROW on the south side of Route 25 between mile markers 1528-1530 for new CVS Pharmacy Mr. Verity, The work as described for the above mentioned Highway Work Permit has been completed to the satisfaction of the NYSDOT Resident Permit Engineer and is clear of any holds or restrictions. If there are any questions on this matter, please feel free to call me at (631)727-1731. Kevin E. atthaei Resident Permit Engineer Residency 03, Riverhead Cc:B. Semone,Planning LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM # : 1000 - 143.-2-1 Project Name: CVS Pharmacy-Mattituck Address: New York State Road 25 known as Main Road Hamlet: Mattituck Applicant Name: Laker Development Group, LLC Owner Name: Robert Chiapetta Zone 1 : B Approval Date: 3/14/05 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 3/14/05 Zone 2: R-40 Zone 3: Location: on the south side of NYS Road 25 on Sigsbee Road and Marlene Lane SC Filing Date: Cand R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED 206 Records Management SCAN Date: IHARRAS BLOOM & ARCHER LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 445 BROAD HOLLOW ROAD SURE 127 KEITH H.ARCHER' MELVILLE,NEW YORK 11747-3601 PAUL J.BLOOM JOHN A.HARRAS KENNETH A.BROWN TELEPHONE (631) 393-6220 STACY E.JACOBSON" TELECOPIER(631)393-6229 ' Also Admitted in CT www.hba-law.com •^Also Admined in FL August 2, 2004 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Noone 210 Sigsbee Road Mattituck,NY 11952 Re: Site Plan approval for proposed CVS Pharmacy Route 25 Mattituck Dear Mr. & Mrs. Noone: At the July 12, 2004 Planning Board hearing on the above-referenced application, you expressed concern that your house lot located on the west side of Sigsbee Road, is aligned with the proposed CVS curb cut on the east side of Sigsbee Road. We are informed by our engineers that your house lot is actually located south of the proposed CVS curb cut. However,understanding the concern you expressed regarding cars entering and exiting the proposed Sigsbee Road curb cut,CVS is offering to provide landscaping material across from the CVS curb cut to enhance your property. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to further discuss the issue. Very truly yours, ll 'Keith H. Archer KHA/fac F:VIBA FlleaVCVS\SootholdALuwrnUn to Noone wile cc: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Chairperson Town Planning Board Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer