Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLove Lane Aquisition CorpTOWN Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD A~II'IJCATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: t ease complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency F,~, t,m~ of Information Officer). One copy will be returr~ed to you in response to yc~r ',,quest, or as an interim response. SECTION I. TO: J ~.~ :_.~ (Department or C'ticer, ii!' known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WIS;ti t'O INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, ta~ ir) number, and any other pertinent information.) Signature of Applica, .~: ~rv~ ~' ~ Printed Name: I,~ £~ .~..__ ~ · Address: I(~,~.j[~ .(~"L~,,.. ~ ~~-- Mailing Address (if cfferent from above): ~-0, Telephone Number::. ~O~q Date: ................................................................. ~O ........ =--= [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WIT,I DELAY* [ ] DENIED* AU~ ~ ~  ~' .~~: Soeth0Jd Tow. Clerk A. NJ, ille~ Date Freedom of Infor[~ ,~tion Officer * If delayed or den~e~ see reverse side for explanation. Albert J~ Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NewYork 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Board of Trustees January 10, 2005 Foil Request of Joan B. Robbins The file of Love Lane Acquisition Corp., SCTM#117-8-18 is available in the Trustees office for review between the hours of 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM. ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.nor thfork,net OFFICE OF TI-IE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: Southold Town Trustees' Office Linda J. Cooper, Deputy Town Clerk DATE: January 4, 2005 Foil Request of Joan B, Robbins Transmitted herewith is a FOIL request of Joan B. Robbins. Please respond to this office within five (5) business days. Thank you. REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARI~AGE O~'~ICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF II~IFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 5~095 M.t- ~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (65D 765-6145 TelephoNe (631) '/65-1800 southoldtown.nor thfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBUC ACCESS TO RECO4~DS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer). One copy will be returned 'to you In response to your request, or as an Interim response. SECTION I. (Department or Officer, if known,' that has th'& information you are req~sting.)' ' RECORD YOU WISH TO INSECT: (Describe the r~ord sought. If possible, Supply date, file title, tax map numar, and any other pertinent information.) Pr l l ¢oa_P,e'WT C oed "signature of Applicant: G~-- ~ . ~ Mailing Address (if different from above): ~.d, ~g Telephone Number: q~--~0 ~9 Date: [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* EIIzabetl~'A. Nevlller Freedom of InfOrmation Officer · I I'LltJlfl: RECEIVED JAN 2005 Date S0uthold Town Clerk ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Toxvn Planning Department t/gouthold Town Board of Trustees FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk DATE: February 12, 2003 RE: 2/12/2003 FOIL Request of Brian A. Andrews, Esq. Transmitted herewith is a FOiL request of Brian A. Andrews Please respond to this office, in writing, within five (5) business days. Thank you. BRIAN A. ANDREWS, ESQ. POST OFFICE BOX 207 235 WICKS ROAD NEW SUFFOLK, NEW YORK 11956 631-734-2555 February 11, 2003 Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, New York 11971 RECEIVED FEB 12 2003 Attention: Freedom of Information Officer Re: Love Lane Acquisitions/Cove View Marina New Suffolk, New York $outhold Town Clerk Dear Sir/Madam: Please accept this letter as application under the Freedom of Information Act for all documents pertaining to applications made over the last three years to the Town of Southold Planning Department and/or Tm.stees pertaining to the waterfront property located in New Suffolk, New York owned by Love Lane Acquisitions located in New Suffolk, New York. Allow me to thank you tbr your gracious assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, BAA:dp Trustees Town of Southold The New Suffolk Civic Association wants to convey its concerns about the proposed expansion of the existing marina being proposed by the Love Lane Acquisition Corporation on the New Suffolk waterfront. As proposed, it will have a profound effect on this hamlet and the surrounding marine communities. Much of this property has been used commercially for over a century: as a submarine base, for shipbuilding, as a marina and shipyard, and for many decades as the location of a fuel business (coal, home heating oil, automotive oil, diesel fuel). The result of this activity has been increased contamination of the bay bottom, the harmful effects of which will be aggravated by the proposed dredging. We have been advised by the Peconic Baykeeper of the following points: a. Dredging this area will re-suspend and disperse heavy metals and other pollutants throughout the area. b. Dredging of this magnitude will remove all of the benthic organisms that may be present in the bottom and become a Iow-oxygenated pollutant sink. C. The proposed wavE; baffle will have an effect on the along-shore currents in the area and may have an adverse effect on the stability of adjacent shorelines. d. Enlarging the existing marina from approximately 30 to 70 slips will impact water quality as a result of more boats and accidental fuel and oil spi[lages. We believe that a project of this magnitude clearly requires a positive declaration pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. It is therefore essential that the developer be required to prepare and submit a new Draft EIS/EIR. The future of our hamlet is at stake. Copies to: Charles T. Hamilton New York State DEC Building 40 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790 ALSO: Assemblywoman Patricia Acompora State Senator Kenneth T. LaValle Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board July 29. 2002 To: Southold To~vn Trustees From: Stephan Roussan 415 Third St. New Suffolk, NY 119:56 To the Southold Town Trustees: Enclosed are signatures on a petition that my family and I circulated during a yard sale we held a few weeks ago. It addresses the potential environmental impacts relating to the marina project at the foot of Main Street in New Suffolk. More than 120 people signed the petition in just a few hours. Please include this petition in your files and discussions as you evaluate the project. If you have any questions about it, please don't hesitate to call me at work: 631-298-5471. PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address Date PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Address Date/, PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name ?~ ,' Address Date 7 -~ - 'q. 7 - 06 -02' PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address Date 5.6.0% PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DE1S/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name _ , Address Date h P/d," f PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address Date PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southoid Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DE1S/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address Date I~ ~O-~oy~o~ ( ' PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact 'Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/EIR) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address Date PETITION TO ENSURE PROTECTION OF THE NEW SUFFOLK WATERFRONT We, the undersigned residents of Southold Town, are concerned about the effects of the proposed expansion of the existing marina on the New Suffolk waterfront. We ask that the Southold Town Trustees require a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Review (DEIS/E1R) of the Cove View Marina Project pursuant to SEQRA. Name Address DaLe '/ July 9, 2002 Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Hall PQ Box 1179- 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Cove View Marina - SCTM# 117-8-18 The New Suffolk Civic Association wants to convey its concerns about the proposed expansion of the existing marina being proposed by the Love Lane Acquisition Corporation on the New Suffolk waterfront. As proposed, it will have a profound effect on this hamlet and the surrounding marine communities. Much of this property has been used commercially for over a century: · As a submarine base, for shipbuilding, · As a marina and shipyard, · And for many decades as the location of a fuel business (coal, home heating oil, automotive oil, diesel fuel). The result of this activity has been increased contamination of the bay bottom, the harmful effects of which will be aggravated by the proposed dredging. We have been advised by the Peconic Bay keeper on the following points: 1. Dredging this area will re-suspend and disperse heavy metals and other pollutants throughout the area. 2. Dredging of this magnitude will remove all of the benthic organisms that may be present in the bottom and become a Iow-oxygenated pollutant sink. 3. The proposed wave baffle will have an effect on the along-shore currents in the area and may have an adverse effect on the stability of adjacent shorelines. 4. Enlarging the existing marina '[rom approximately 30 to 70 slips will impact water quality as a result of more boats and accidental fuel and oil spillages. We believe that a project of this magnitude clearly requires a positive declaration pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act. It is, therefore, essential that the developer be required to prepare and submit a new Draft EIS/EIR. The future of our hamlet is at stake. Sincerely, Lauren Grant, Pres dent New Suffolk Civic Association Cc: Charles T. Hamilton-NY State DEC Senator Kenneth T. La Valle NY State ,~Ssemblywoman Patricia Acampora Southold Town Supervisor Josh Horton and the Southold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board Chairman Bennett Orlowski and the Town Planning Board NEW SUFFOLK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, IN(-;. POST OFFICE BOX 642 NEW SUFFOI.K, NY 11956 ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER %~fFOL/c %, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southo!d, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freeddm of Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION I. TO: (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) supply Signature of Applicant: ~ ~ Printed Name: ~-~/ ~-'//~. Address: ~iling Address (if different from ~bove}: Telephone Number: ?~lf~fl ~ Date: [ ] APPROVED RECEIVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* Freedom of Information Officer OCT 3 1 ~'~ Date , Southold Town Clerk * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. ~IO~hn~I ~rlDOHDJ~rlD r"r, T t'~r I !gl I New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region One Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 Phone: (631)444-0365 · FAX: (631)444-0360 Website: www.dec.state,ny,us Edn M. Crotty Commissioner May30,2002 Albert Krupski, Jr. Board of Town Trustees, Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Dear Mr. Krupski: I am writing in response to your lead agency coordination request for the Cove View Marina project on Main Street in New Suffolk. The NYSDEC has no objection to your agency asstmaing the responsibilities of lead agency for this project. Issues of concern which we feel should be evaluated include the impacts of this project on shellfish and finfish habitats and the potential re- suspension of contaminants within the marina basin. Thank you for requesting comments at this early stage of the project. As the project develops and more details become available, we would appreciate the opportunity to comment further. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson May 13, 2002 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern that you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) te assist you in your response. Project Name: ~_~Q. L~,¢,_O ~'~-~.C~ Requested Action: ~;~2~¢~, 0._~[~.~,~ ~)Etn'~,<,Ltto~ ~[-~'~L~ttC[ SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I Contact Person: (631) 765-1892 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. If no response is received from you, it will be assumed that there is no objection to the Board of Trustees assuming lead agency status. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Albert Krupski, Jr. President CC: Army Corp. of Engineers Dept. of State DEC (*Maps are enclosed for your review) · 14-16-2 617.20 Appendix A Stale Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be signit~icant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowleclge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full E^F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nlature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or a~:tion. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impac~ that may occur from ~ project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF compJeted for this project: I-I Part 1 i-1 Part 2 [}Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate], and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, .therefore, is one which will not have a significant Impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t~e mlflgatlon measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative dedasation will be prepared.* C. The project may result In one or more large and important Impacts that may have a s!gnificant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the enviro'tment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will ,be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF AG"rION LOCATION OF A~ION 0~lude Street Address. MunlclpalUy and NAME OF APPUCANT~PON~R ADORE~ NAME OF ~NER Of ADDRESE; BUSINESS TELEPHONE I STATE I ZIP CODE BUSINESS( ) TELEPHONE CATY/PO J STATE { ZIPCOOE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question--indicate N.A. If not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both* developed 1nd undeveloped areas. 1, Present land use: I-IOrban rllndustria[ j~i,Commerclal C]Residentiai (suburban) ~Rural (non-farm) DForest rlAgticulture r'lOther 2. Total acreage of project area: %~' ~[) ~/~ ~ .~acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE - PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) ~fl-7 Yr:(k'l'~ ~ ~/ ' ~ L acres · · . acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project siteJ ~-'~ ¢')~ ~ ~ ;'£~-~ ~ a. Soil drainage: I~Well drained I (, .~ % of site C]Moderately well drained % of site npoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System:/ acres. (See '1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcropplAgs on project sltel C]Yes I~lNo a. What is depth to bedrock1 (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: I~0-10% / ,7 o % {310-15% _ % Q1S% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E}Yes ~]No 7. Is project substantially Contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? QYes ~.No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~ :(- (in feet) 9. Is site located over a prirriary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I-lYes ,~DNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I~Yes QNo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as th~'eatened or endangered? QYes ~o According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Q-lYes ~3~1o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space' or recreation area? l-lyes '~No . If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? l-lYes ~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to projec~ area: -f~d~ c c ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~/ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) ~.7. ;s ~.he site served by existing public utilitlies? I~Yes F'JNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow .donnection? ~[lYes E]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? C]Yes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and !~)47 r-lyes ~No 19. If the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617i' nYes I~No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I-lyes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project If in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor ~> I~ b. Project acreage to be developed: _~-I~ acres initially; L~ ~r._ c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped a~ acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed ~ ,~ %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed J~'~- t~: g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ ~'- · (upon' completion of p¢oject)[' h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Ultimately I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height; ,~,~9 width; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~ ~-(/ 3 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium / ~0 length. fL 2, How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc,) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? l~Yes [~No ONIA a. If yes~ for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? E/Yes '~Ho tons/cubic yards 4. I-Io',9 many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed'from site? c_b acres, 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? months, (including demolition). month year, (including demolition). month year. , I~Yes f-INo ; after project is complete []]Yes ~No If yes, explain i'"lYes 6, If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 7, If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases.~ 8, Will blasting occur during construction? [DYes I~o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction /~- 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? C/Yes a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~Yes ~No Type ~Db~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~,Yes' ~No 'IS. Is project or any portion of project located in a 'lO0 year flood plain? ~,Yes 'I6. Will the project generate solid waste? ' [~[LYes [DNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month \) '2~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes c. If yes, give name ~ °g ~a~43-Ha~t') ;location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? C]Yes ~l,No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life~ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [DYes [DNo tons/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [DYes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Q-lyes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? '1~Yes E/No If yes , indicate type{s) /__~-~-~ ~-T-//~ ~_ I-T- 'V 22. If water supply Is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gaUons/minute. ' 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [DYes If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: City. Town. Village Board ~.Yes [:)No City, Town, Village Planning Board '~Yes [3No City, Town Zoning Board [3Yes [:]No City, County Health Department [DYes [:]No Other Local Agencies [3Yes [3No Other Regional Agencies' [::]Yes [3No State Agencies ~Yes [:]No Federal Agencies ~[]Yes [3No Type Submiltal Date C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes [3No ' If Yes, indicate decision required: nzoning amendment []]zoning variance []]special use permit Clsubdivision l~site plan Phew/revision of master plan [3resource management plan [3other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site[' Tv~ ~ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the siite? ¥~ ~q~ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? G. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~.Yes nNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 14 mile~' (~.Yes [-INo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivisiion of land; how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? f-lYes ~,No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? OYes 1~o a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ayes C3No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? f-lYes' ~klo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? [3Yes [3No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Ap lican nsor Name L~ LF~. ~C~LLl6tl ~t~J ~ Date the action Is in the ~oastal Area, ~nd yorJ are a state agent, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this ~ment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable't The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance, They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacLs and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, cgnsider long term, short term and cumlative effects. .Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Iden(Ifylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It Is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A-No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t.o the project site~' C]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 [] I-] [~]Yes []No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than [~ n []Yes 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. [] I~ [~Yes []No · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally'within [] [~] [~]Yes [~)No 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than I year or involve more [] ~] OYes than one phase or stage. * Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 [] [~3 []Yes I~]No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. [] [] [~]Yes []No · Construction in a designated floodway. [] [] I~]Yes []No * Other impacts [] ~] [~Yes []No 1 2 3 Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Moderete Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sltet' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)C)NO QYES · Specific land forms:. [] n OYes ONO IMPAOT ON WA'rER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact O O O [] O 2 Potential Large Impact O O O [] O 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Pro,iec! Change []Yes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo 4. Will proposed action affect any non-prutected existing or new body of water? ONO OYES Example{ that would apply to column 2' · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body o! water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: O []Yes ONo OYes l-INo OYes ONo 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? [:3NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (projecl;) action. · ProPosed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the slt e to facilities which present!y do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that ti{ere will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other Impact: O O O O O O O D O O O [3 O O O O [] O O O [] O OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo []Yes {]]NO {]]Yes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes ONo 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ ONO I-WES Examples that would apply to column ;! · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 []Yes [:]No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: 1 2 Small to Potential Moderate Large Impact Impact Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change [=]Yes [:]No [=]Yes [:]No []Yes ON• [~Yes []No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? mN• I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour, · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species[' OHO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site ot found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitaL · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Ofher impacts- [] [] ayes ON• 0 [] []Yes ON• 0 [] OYes ON• []] 0 []Yes ONo 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species[' I:INO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture~ vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 [] 0 []Yes ON• [] O OYes ON• ~] [] OYes []]No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems [e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures [e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact O 3 Can Impact E Mitigated B) Project Chan.( []Yes [~]N. []Yes []N, []Yes [~]N, OYes ON, IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~' [3NO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contras{ to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: [] O [] [] O 0 [] [] []Yes ON( []Yes ON< []]Yes []Yes []N( IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action Impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importancel mN• I-lYES Examples that would apply to co~[umn 2 · Prop•ged Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: O 0 [] [] [] [] [] OYes •Nc []Yes ON< []Yes ON( []]Yes []]Nc IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunitlesl Examples that would apply to column 2 [:)NO [3YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community, · Other ImpactS: 0 O [] [] [] [] OYes []N, OYes ON, []]Yes []N, 9 IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14 Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? ~)NO OYeS List the environmental characteristics that caused the desi§nation o[ the CEA. 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Poten'tial Large Impact Can impact Be Mitigated By Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use. function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: O O [] [] O O [] [] O O OYes ONo OYes ONo OYes E]No OYes ONo []Yes ONo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? · [:]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of mo~;ement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems · Other impacts: O O [] OYes ONo OYes ONo []Yes []No IMPACT ON ENERGY Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in th~ use ol any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: [] O O [] [~Yes C~No [:]Yes ONo OYes ONo 10 1 2 NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS Small to Potential 1-7. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result Moderate Large of the Proposed Action? [~NO EYES Impact Impact Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive [] [] []Yes []No facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). [] [] []Yes []No · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local O [] []Yes []No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a [] O []Yes I-'IN• noise screen. · Other impacts: [] O OYes []No 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? . DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritatinB, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 fe~t of a site used for the disposal of solid or. hazardous waste. · Other impact~: [] O FiYes []No O [] OYes I']No O [] OYes •No [] FI OYes i-IN0 O O FiYes FIN• IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAQTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? FIND I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, tOWn or village in which the [] project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services O will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this projecL · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. [] · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures .O or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services [] (e.g. schools, police and tire, utc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future'projects. O · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. [] · Other Impacts- FI []Yes I-IN• n []Yes C]No [] OYes ON• O FiYes •No [] []Yes ON• O []Yes ON• [] nYes ON• O nYes ON• O []Yes ON• 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental imp·cts,' •NO DYES I! uny ·orlon In part 2 I~ Identllled al · potential large Impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude o( Impact, proceed lo Part 3 11 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE Oh IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even i! the impact(s) may be mitigated. Inslructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe~ifapp~icabie)h~wtheimpactc~u~dbemitigated~rreducedt~asma~~t~m~derateimpactbYpr~jectchange(s)` 3.' Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · its i~;reversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether.the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consecluence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · 'Whether known objections to 'the proje~:t relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 617.20 SEQR Appendix B State, Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form .may be used to, provide additional information relating to Question ! ] of Part 2 of the Full EAF, (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualifies? "A site or structure listed on the Hational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · Hational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · Hational Hatural Landn~arks and other outstanding natural features? · Hational Park Service lands7 · Rivers designated as Hatlonal or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high expos, ure, such as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated Interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or deslgnaUon? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road? * State? o Local road? Project and Resource (in t4iles) O-V,~ ~A-1/2 V2.3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] O' [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] O [] [] [] O [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] O [] [] [] O 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened b~/summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes []Ho 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? OYes OHo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. surrounding Within *% mile * ! mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] · Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Spa~:e ~] [] Flat [] [] t4ountalnous [] [] Other [] [] HOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V~ mile i-lYes r-]No *1 miles F-lYes [-[No *2 miles i-lYes []No *3 miles []Yes [-]No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is HOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proPOsed action is · FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved In recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [~] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At workslte [] [] [] [] Other [] [] [~ [] 2 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (1'o be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR j 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCA¥1ON: Municipality Courtly 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street add,ess and road IntersecUon~, prominent landmarks, etc.. ~r provide map) SEQR ~. ~S PROPOSED ACTION: 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: [] M odlflo~I Ion/alterat Ion 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED:. Initially sues Ultimately 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LANO USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Y. [] No I! No, describe briefly WHAT IS PRE~ENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT'/ [] parkZFo~esuOpen apace [] Other 10. ~OF.S AGTION INVOLVE A pERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL. STATE OR LOC. ALT/ [] Ye~ [] No If l~t, II~t &~a) a~d p~'Itlt/epf~w~l~ 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AG'I'ION HAVE A OURREHTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Ye~ [] No I! yet, IL~t agency name ~ld.l~mgt/apIx~Y&l 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSE0 AG'I1ON WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REOUIRE MOOiFICATIONI' [] Yes [] No I CERTIFY THaT THE INFORMATION PROVlOED ABOVE 18 TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNO~E I If the action Is in the Coastal Ares, and you are a state agency, complete the ~ Coastal Assessment Fon~ belore proceeding with this assessment I OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEt~ /o be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.47 If yes. coordinale Ihe rev ew p~oce~$ and use the FULL f-lYes ONo B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLIS'i'ED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 61 ? 6~ II No. a nag&bye decla~ahon may be superseded by another involved agency. [] Yes [] No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwriUen, il legible) Cl. Exiseng air quality, SUftace Or groundwater quality or quanlily, noise levels, exisling Irallic paUerns, solid wasle ploduction or disposal, potential for erosion, dcatnage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, o¢ related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-C57 Explain brieUy. C7. Other impacts (Includi~'~ changes In use of ellhe~ quantity or type of en~'gy)? Exglalo b~iefly. O. WILL THE PRO. JEOT HAVE AN IMPACT OH THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTIC~ THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMEN! OF ^ CrA? 0 Yes 0 .o E. IS THER~ OR IS THERE UKELY TO EE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No If Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above, determine whelher it is substantial, large, Impmlant or otherwise significant. Each etfect ~hould be assessed In connection with Its (a) astting (i.e. urban o~ rural}; (13) proba~tity o! occuffing; (o) duration; (d} IrreversllNIIty; (e) geographic sco~e; and (~) magnitude. If ne~ecsary, add attaohmen[s o~ reference supp~ting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse Impacts have been Idonlllled and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination and alg~ficanoe must eYaluste the po{entlal Impact of the p~oposed action o~ the environmental characteristics of the CEA. n Check this box If you have Identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check thie box II you have determined, based on Ihe information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Date 2 SEQRA RESOLUTION RE: LOVE LANE ACQUISITION SCTM#117-8-18 Resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold that the application of Love Lane Acquisition Corp., more full described in the public hearing section #16 of the Trustee agenda dated Wednesday, March 20, 2002 is, pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations, is declared an Unlisted Action; and be it Further resolved that the applicant is required to submit a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF); and be it Further resolved that upon receipt of the LEAF the Clerk of the Trustees is hereby directed to commence a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA. PELL. F'TREAU /~ PELLETREAU A~'TC)RNEYS AND COUN.SELLORS AT LAW ~O CHURCH STREET - BOX IIO ;='ATC. HOGUE:. N~'W YORK July 24, 1986 Joseph Fenton, Esq. Jackson St~reet New Suffolk. New Yo=k 11956 ~e: ~arina Say Club, Lcd. Dear ~. Fenton: Encl. osed please £ind an executed copy signed Car~ of the Covenants and Restrictions for of New Suffolk. New York. Very truly yours, PELLETREAU & PELLETREAU Janet F. Haeberle Legal Asei~l~tant JFH:lyn Enclosures by Mr. Riohard T. the Marina Bay Club Olu(7} P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, NY May 15, 1986 11947 Mr. JoSeph Fenton Jackson Street New Suffolk, NY 11956 Dear Mr. Fenton: Please find enclosed a copy of a letter from Pelletreau & Pe!letreau to the Southold ~own ~lannln~ Board statinq that Mr. Carr will place a covenant on the New Suffolk property which will ban full time residency on boats docked in the slips. HER:ml Eno. CC: Richard Cart John J. Hart, Esq. Sincerely, ~~a~Jr'~' Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town H',dl. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New Yo~k 11971 $OUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Wednesday, January 16, 2002, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Scott Hilary, seconded by Bob Ghosio, to TABLE the Wetland Permit Application of LOVE LANE ACQUISITION CORP. to remove the existing peninsula and rebuilt bulkheads and travel lift. Located: 650 First Street, New Suffolk. SCTM#117-8-18 The CAC Tables the application because more information is needed. The CAC questions if an Environmental Impact Statement is necessary. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried That as "IUIRRI'NR BRY CLUB" by t:he Touan oF Sour.hold, it is agreed that: 1. Rt. no t.ime u~l! there be erected on the premises a st. ructure to be used For residential puPposes, 2. None oF the boats moored o~ docked a[ [he p~emises shall be used For resdLden~lal purposes, ~.e., sleeping aboard overnight, ~xcept thm~: t~ans~ent users oF boat sl~ps may stay on the:LP bo~ts oue~night prouided [hei~ use is occasionai and no[ regular. ~. Th:is couenant ~s cre~ed For the benefit oF ~he To~n oF Sout.hold and all presenk ~nd Future resident.s oF the Hamlet oF Ne~ SuFF.olk, so long as they remain residents. a condit.ion oF t.he approval oF the site plan For couenant.ed and 2105C/1 Town Trustees o£ t~e Town of Southol~ Soutaold Town ~all ~out~iol~, i~ew ~ork 11~71 Dear ~rus tees wish to outline ~,~arcb 20, 2002 F~: Public hearing ~arch 20, 2002 L~we Lane Acquisition Corp. 11'?.-d-18 a number ~e~f-concerns a~out the iiayners' proposal to expa~ tacit marina. AS you know, we in ~ew Saf£ol~ have travele~ t~is romte before. ~any of my concerns are ~ae same as those ex- pressem in 19o6-~7 in regare to tr~e then-propose~ 2arina ~ay Clu~ -- questions equally valid toeay. 1 ) What will ue tr, e e£~ect bi' the bulkheading an~ aoe~ extensions on t~e stability or the remaincer of she ~ew Su_fl'olk shoreline to t~e nert~l, south, and west? 2) Since all construction woul~ ~e wit~in a ~esignate~ floo~ plain, w~at woul~ ~e t~e impact o£ site elevation on storm run-off into b~e Say anm onto tko surrounming uplan~ areas? 3) Prior use bi~ the uplani ana unaerwaZer properties as a marina and submarine base is 0eliewe~ to kawe resulte~ in contamination of both. ~aat will ~e the effect on marine life o.f the iispersion of toxic metals in She water ~uring ~redgi~g operations ani during uplarm construction? ~ew soil tests are needed for the presence on t:~e marine ~ottom an~ uplan~ of heavy metals anl pesticide resi~iues. To my ~nowte~te there has ~een no enviro~ental olean- mp of tc~e properties. 4) are any uneer~roun~ l'uel storage ta_n~s proposee? if so, what are ir~e aazar~.s in a ti~lal flood plain? What are the plans to hanile possible accidental fuel spills at the doe~s an~ within the boat storage builiing? 5) ~ha.t is t~e propose~ sewage treatment system? Site-specifio con- eitions include tidal influence, a ~igh water table, an~ prior landfill, ii' lea. er. lng pools are planne~, what amount of rainfall is the system ~e.signei to handle? What will prevent excess storm- water overflow into t~e Oay? What wo-~_l~ De the effect of wiie seasonal variations in the waste stream flow? Eave t,~ere ~een percolation tests an~ soil ~orings taken on site to eetermine what loa~ the groun~ would '~e able to aan~le? ¥~aat woul~ ~e the effect ozs. groumdwater flows in the area? 6) t~ow muc~ light spillover woull there De onto t~e surrounding hamlet, t~e Day, and t~e opposite resieential shore? 7) ~hat wo~li be t~ze noise impact of operational mec~anical systems? Does the projecte~ operation include sal'eguar~s against regular or continuous li~e-a~oar~ resilience on ~oats, i.e., floating con~osY ~ l-~ow coul~ our narrow s~reets aha limited par~in~ absor~ more tr~an ~ou~le the zrafYic? Town Trustees page 2 1~,arca 20, 2002 ~'inally, with re~ar~i to underwater ownership, does the uplani owner in fact own t~e entlre underwater ~rant area? While the 183U grant Oy ~,~ew Yor~ ~tate to t~e uplan~ owners appears to oe valid, it ~oes include a condition: unless "all an~ every part" o£ tae premises were applie~ "to the purposes of ¢om~:erce, ~y ereeting Do~s ani ~harw'es t~ereon, an~ i'illing in t~e same," the grant of the mnuse~ portion woul~ ~e caneelei, is it possible taat less than 'aalf the ~ew Yor~ orate grant area has overstate years oeen utilize~ oy tae uplanm owners? In view oi all taese concerns, surely a new En~iro~amental Impact ~tatement must be a requirement. I£ some ol' these issues fall within the jurisr~iction of ott~er Boar~s or a. ge~eies, i sm~mit taat the overriding concern for the efi'eet on t~e hamlet and on the Bay shoul~ Oe a factor in your consiaerati OhS. 1 nope t~e Eaynors' marina an~ l~ew Sui~oli~ can success£ully co- exist, x su~mit tais woulm nave to mean fewer boat slips an~ 0oats, i'ewe~' cars ann parking spaces, an~ an office building that ~oes not bloc~ t~e foot o~' tae main street in the ~iamlet with its direct view oi tae oay. i would nope taat some consideration could 0e given to public access. 2002 is not 1~87. z.~owewer, some taings remain tae same. i quote a neighbor from t~at time: "in some measure i, ew 5ufl'olk could ue said to nave extremely low zflres~old levels which would to its inhabitants signal a perception oI pollution a/l~ deterioration." Our h~mlet is very precious to us ano we wis'n to protect it. Tha~m [~ou I'or 3our attention. ~ery truly yours, ~n ~o~ins lb9~5 ~ain ~treet ~ew Jufiol~, l~ew ~ork 119~6-014~ March 15, 2002 Southold Town Board of Tru,.stees Town Hall Southold, New York Re: COVE VIEW MARINA SCTM# 117-8-18 I Dear Members of the Board, The New Suffolk Civic Association organized a public meeting at the School in New Suffolk last fall for the purpo~e of discussing the above referenced project, and approximately sixty people from the community attended. The sponsors of the project, Henry and Mike Raynor, were kind enough to present drawings and answer questions from those in attendance. Sintce that time there have been many discussions about the project in New Suffolk, and there remains serious interest. Other projects have been proposed for this site in the past, and the residents question if this, finally, is the right project for the community. The Civic Association has offered to communicate their concerns to the relevant regulatory agencies, such as the Board of Trustees. In addition, you can expect to hear from many New Suffolk residents in person. Although significantly scaled back from the Marina Bay Club application of fifteen years ago, and the condo project be fore that, many of the environmental issues are the same. There is concern that the proposed construction, which extends far out into the Bay, will affect the local ecology, particularly the natural movement of water and sand. The site is at the edge of the North Race, a narrow strait between Robins Island and the New Suffolk. Strong tidal currents move through the Race, and move significant amounts of sand along with them. Residents with long experience on the Bay have noted long term changes in the local sand bars. Of particular concern is a shoal located a few hundred yards off the point of New Suffolk, which has seemed to grow in recent years, and become shallower. How would the proposed project affect this condition and the navigable waters in the immediate vicinity? There has also been much discussion about how the project will affect the "littoral drift" of sand along the shoreline. Sand appears to move from west to east, from the shore of Great Peconic Bay to that of Cutchogue Harbor, past the project site. There is already a deficit of sand along the eastern beaches of New Suffolk, from the end of Orchard Street, to well past the Old Cove Yacht Club at Old Harbor Road. Beaches along this shore have eroded, in part because sand is trapped by the current breakwaters on the project site. Would not a larger breakwater, projecting further out into the Bay, block more sand from nourishing this beach? Could worse erosion occur? NEW SUFFOLK CIVIC ASSOCIATION, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 642 NEC,' SUFFOLK, NY 11956 The construction process itself raises some concerns. What will the effect be of dredging potentially contaminated material from the bottom of the existing boat basin? Similarly, the upland soil has been suspected of contamination for many years. Will samples of both the basin bottom and the upland soil be collected and tested as part of your review? If contamination is found, what level of clean-up will be a condition of your approval? Several people have expressed the concern that adequate steps be taken to prevent new contamination of the Bay and groundwater from the operation of the marina. The facility may end up functioning as a "dock-ominium", (live aboard yachts), which will lead to a greater concentration of impacts. We know there are stringent regulations governing fuel storage and sanitary waste collection and disposal. Will you be diligent in your review of the design and operating regulations of these facilities? Since a large part of the project involves construction on underwater land, we wonder if sufficient documentation of continuing title to that land (1838 grant) will be required? Many people have expressed the opinion that the new office building and chandlery, as proposed, will be in the wrong spot. The fact that it will block the view of the Bay from Main Street may not be one of your chief concerns. However, is it not an issue that the building is far closer to the wetland edge than the typically required 75 feet? The site has been an active port, shipyard, submarine base, commercial center, and marina for over a hundred and fifty years. It has played a central role in the history of New Suffolk. The ravages of time have brought serious deterioration to the site. Most people in the community who have spoken with us are in support of improvements, however, everyone agrees that the "improvements" must not cause un-intended environmental, social, or economic consequences, which will be regretted long into the future. In your thorough evaluation of this application, please seek answers to these important questions, and remain open to input from the community. Respectfully, Thomas C. Samuels President, New Suffolk Civic Association Cc: Henry Raynor 373 OCT-2D-2BD1 12:37 NAT[~L LAND TENURE ,..~,..~',~, ~,~.~ ,¢,.~-,~ .~.~_ ,~.~,.~.~.~ ..~,.~,~,~t~, .,.,.,.~,..~.~, ~ , . / , .. . ? . , . {. ~ , , ~ ~ 0 ..... . . , ('- ~ , ~ - ). , ,~ . '~, I"'' ' ' ~ ~ I (~' ' · ~' ':'~'t''~''" ....... ~"'~"~'"' ~":'~"~-' '~ ""~'~"~-~""'~"~"~ '~'~"~-~ I .~,~ ,~.~..~ ..~Z.~,.U.-,~-6 ..,,~,.~. ~ ....... ,~.,.~. ,.,,. , . ~ .. ...... ~.::..,.~_~ 0CT-29-2001 12:38 LRND TENURE P.04/04 TOTRL P.04 5 ~ o 0CT-29-2001 12:57 NRT! LAND TENURE NA' ~NAL LAND TENURE P.0~/0~ . . . .. ~,:.'.,~:..., . . ., I~.~ · -~-.~--~.~,~.,~.~ ./ .......... ~...~ .,. _.~.~ ~ , , ;.~ B' j~. . _. : .... .~...,,~,, · . . , ~'~ ~"~' --- -'".~:"~,, ?".,':~'~--. ,~ "~ ,z. - :' , · '" ';" ',' -:".~-M · . I , , '~., ~' , ~.. . . ./. ~.~ · . . .,~ ., . B~..~. '~ . . ,,..,,:~ ~ : " -- - - -~'.,'.~ ~ OCT-29-20D1 12:3S NATn~NRL LAND TENURE ~ P.02/04 P.03/~4 0CT-29-20~1 12:313 # NRT~qLL~D TENURE P.04/04 / AJhert J. Krupsld, President James King, Vice-President ~t ~,~ Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765~1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application ...5"Wefland Permit Application JMajor · Waiver/Amendment/,Changes _,~'Rece~ved Applicafio '~c~ eceiv ree: Completed Appli~ ~ff6'fi~ Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination: (date sent) ~CAC Referral Sent: ) _~2Date of Inspection: I Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: .?ublic Hearing Held: Resolution: Minor Name of Applicam Address ~/~qT~ 'i-t_~ ~k. c~-Xl. 11 ~honeNumb~:( ) S~olk County T~ Map Number: 1000- Prope~ Location: ~rovide L~CO Pole ~, dismc~ to cross stre~s, ~d location) AGE~: (~ applicabl0 Address: Phone: Board of Trustees Application Land Area (in square feet): Aa-ca Zoning: '~ Previous use of property: Intended use of property: GENERAL DATA Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency.9 x~ No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: R~rRO wF__= ~[~ ~ ~ c..~)- ~o~kt~6,~'l~ ~'T~l~u~.~ ~t~T ~l~ ~ ~ ~e wetlands present M~n 100 f~ of the pro~s~ a~Mty7 ~ No Yes D~s the proj~ involve ~x~vation or filling? No ~ Yes If Yes, how much matenfl mil be ex~vat~?2~ .(cubic ywds) How much matefifl ~1 be filleq? (cubic Manner in w~ch material ~11 be removed or de. sited: ~c-Tfl Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) t PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~Nf-~ ,E.. ~E~ ~./~',,t,.ol~ , residing at ~-~T~k 1¥-~7'. , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the ~-~x day of ~E W ,~9~ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~If~ ~ ~%~ ~q,¥, , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) ~ _ ~ ~_~ mail. Sworn to. before me this day of ~J~-~ ,~ % Notary Public MFJ.AN~: V. BA~ 617.21 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT I~ I 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJE~ LOCATION: 4. PRECISE LOCATION {Street adS,ess and road inters~tions, prominent landmarxs, etc.. or ~ovioe maD) 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: [] MoclificationlaJt erst ion 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially ~ acres Ultimately ~ acres a. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WiTH E;(ISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXiSTiNG L.~NO USE RESTRiCTiONS? ~,¥es [] No If NO. describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? [] Residential [--~,!ndustrial ~t~Comrnercial Describe: [] Agriculture 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY PROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LO(AL)? [] No tf yes, list agency(s) and permit/ApprovalS 11. OO~S ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTIOM HAVg A CURRENTCY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ~ Yes' ~ NO If y~, list ag~ llama and pe~iUapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE ~4OOIFICATION? t{::l~Nd . ";' Yes I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE iS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE if the action'is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, comptete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a._~essmeot OVER ! PART II--E,,NVIRONMENTA' '$~I~hlE,,"~T ~To be comole:eQ ~y AGaric' PART Ill--0ETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) Chec.~ :his box if you have idenrifieP one or more potentially large or significant adverse imoac:s which occur. Then ~roceed direc:ly ~c :ne FULL E.AF Analor prepare a positJv~Qeclaradcn. Check [his box ff you ~ave de[ermineO, based on the information and analysis ~bove and any supoortin~ documentation. :h~[ ;he proooaed ac:ion ~,VILL ClOT result in.ny significant adverse environmental A~NO provide on ~tsc~ments aa necsssary, the reasons supCordng mis determinsdon: Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall .53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) w STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I,~{ ~. i~7~ , residing at ~?Z C~l~6t b~l~ belng duly sworn~ depose ~nd say: That on the~} ~ day of ~¥, 200~, I personally posted the property known as ~c~ ~ ~\~\~ ~ ~. by placing the Board .of Trustees ~fficial poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the ~ublic hearing. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held~/~ Dated: (signature) Sworn to before me this Notary Publi~ TRANSACTIONAb DISCLOSURE FORM The Town e~ S~hold'e Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts interest on the part of town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide ln£ormation which can alert the town of possible conflicts of interest end"allow ib to bake whatever action is nec~essary to avoid same. (bast , ~i~t name, m~dd.le ~n~t~al, unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such ~s a company. ~ ac, indicate the other person's or company's name,) NATURE OF APPbI~ATION~ (Check all that apply.) Tax grievance Variance Change of zone ARp~val of plat ]<. ~ . gxe~phion from plpt or official map employee o~ the To~n of Southold? -Re~a~tonehip" by blood, marriage, or business in~eree~. ~hfch ~he eo~n o~ieer or employ&e hue even a pareiai ownership off (or employmen2 by) a eorp~raBion in vhiclt She ~oVn officer or employee o~na more ehan shares. YES__ NO , : da~e and sign ~here Name of person employed by the To~n of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (the applicant) and the town o~icer ~r employee. ~ither check the appropriate line A) through D) and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee Or tits or her apouee~' parent, or child ia (check all that apply)~ A) the owner o~ greater b~an 9% of the shares o~ the corporate stock o~ the applic~nt (when the applicant' is a corpora~ion)~ ~) the legal or beneficial owner o~ any interest in a noncorporate'entity (when time applicant is not a corporation)l __C) an o~icer~ di:rector~ applicant~ or D) tbs actual applicant. pa~tner~ or empl0yee, of the DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONsIIXP