Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-96.-1-19.1EXISTINO MONOPOLE TO REMAIN V,I,F, PROPOSEDNEXTEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO EXISTING MONOPOLE-- REPUTED OWNER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 PROPER~ I SITE PLAN I /./ EXISTING FENCED COMPOUND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE FOR NEXTEL EQUIPMENT. AREA OF WORK. SEE 2/A-2 ENLARGED pLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION, -- XtSTING TREE LINE (TYP,) LANDSCAPED BITUMINOUS PAVEM ENT~ '° REPUTED OWNER ,JOSEPH SCHOENSTEIN 505 LEEWARD DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 REPUTED OWNER ARTHUR ,.lUNGE P.O,BOX 299 ORIENT NEW YORK 11957 ,¢ US PAVEMENT EXISTING TREE LiNE (TYP.) __ EXISTING EXISTING DRYWELL EXISTING PROPANE TANKS EXISTING METER CENTER-- EXISTING TRANSFORMER REPUTED OWNER JENNIE HARRIS ESTATE 305 LEEWARD DRIVE SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 \ ,/ O' 1 O' 20' 40' / 1) AREA OF SITE 05ACRES or 45,589SQ. FT, BLDNG,-4,772 SQ, FT. 2) AREA OF BUILDING(S) PROP. BLDNG.-261 5) PERCENT OF LOT OCCUPANCY 11% 4) AREA OF PAVING 14,740,4 SQ. FT, (32%) 5) AREA AND PERCENT OF NATURAL VEGETATION TO REdAIN PERMANENTLY 52,5~. & 2.3,899,84 SO, FT. 6) AREA AND PERCENT OF SITE AREA REVEGETATED BaCK TO NATURAL N/A 19% & 8530,5 SO, FT. 7) AREA AND PERCENT OF TURF AND LANDSCAPING AREA AND PERCENT OF NON-FERTILIZER DEPENDENT VEGETATION 8) 33.5% & 15569,34 SQ. FT. 9) PARKING REQUIRED N/A :ARKING PROVIDED N/A 10) LANDBANKED STALLS N/A 11) LOADING REQUIRED N/A LOADING PROVIDED N/A DATUM U,S,C, & O,S, OR T.O.S, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 12) 13) iNTENDED USE OF PROPERTY 14) DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER 15) ZONING 16) SUFFOLK CO. TAX NUMBER(S) N DUSTRIAL/COMMUNICATION N/A L.t, LIGHT INDUSTRY DIST,lOO0 SECh 96 BI.K, 1 LOT 19,I 1) CONCRETE CURB N/A 2) ASPHALT CURB N/A 3) GRAVEL WALKS 60 SQ.FT. 4) PAVING 5) CATCH BASIN 6) STORM DRAINS 7) STOCKADE FENCE 8) CHAIN LINK FENCE 9) SCREEN PLANTING 10) SHRUBS N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11) SEEDED/LAWN AREA N/A 12) RECHARGE BASIN EXCAVATION N/A 13) RECHARGF-AASIN FENCING N/A 14) RECHARGE BASIN pLANTING N/A ..~,~0~, .~ / ZONING DISTRICT: 1000 LONGITUDE: W72',47' 14,4" / Town SO_UTHO D 53095 MAIN ROAD NOTE; DUE TO THE INDUSTRIAL AESTHETIC NATURE OF TBE EXISTING  SITE, FENCING TO MATCH EXISTING WILL BE PROVi,OED AT THE ~// PROPOSED EXTENSION TO THE COMPOUND, NO ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING WILL BE PROVIDED, / iNFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY ~BARRET, BONACCl & VAN WEELE, P,C.' CIVIL ENGINEER/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS, 175A COMMERdZ DR. HAUPPAUGE, NY 1178;8, PHONE: (631) 455-1111~ FAX (631) 435-1022 ( AUGUST 4, 2001, PROJECT # A010670 CONCRETE CURB LIPA PP#420 WILLIAM F, COLLINS, AIA ARC H I T E C T 8, LLP 10-1 TECHNOLOGY DR1V~ VOICE: 631.-6~9-84~0 http://www.wfcaia.com ~ _ CON~OLTANT: ~ON VISED FOR COORDINATION AS PER NEXTEL DATE ]~SU~SL~ TO DATE ISSUED TO 08/22/01 FOR FL,, ¢ COMMUNICATIONS APPR( 'ED BY PECONIC P~NNIN~ BOARD TOWN OF 3UTHOLD 5/221( AS NOTED L.S/W.K. SP PKG ~ NORTH NY-2812 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE,_NY PLAN Planning Board 105'-8"J- AGL ~ 164'-8"-+ AMSL T.O. EXISTING MONOPOLE ~,~ /02' 6"J- AGL ~ 161'-6"~ AMSL ~"~ OF EXISTING ANTENNAS ~-'E OF PROPOSED ANTENNAS 70'-2"± AMSL ~T,O. PROPOSED ENCLOSURE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE PROPOSED FENCE EXISTING FENCE [JL_ PROPOSED PART OF FENCE TO MATCH EXISTING NOTE; THE REFERENCED AMSL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON HAS BEEN OBTAINED UTILIZING 5-D TOPOQUADS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING SOFTWARE BY "DELORME". ACTUAL ELEVATIONS MAY VARY ACCORDING TO POINT'S OF REFERENCE NOTE; PROPOSED ANTENNA MOUNT ASSEMBLY TO BE ERECTED ON EXISTING MONOPOLE. DESIGN OF MOUNT ASSEMBLY AND EVALUATION OF EXISTING MONOPOLE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE BY OTHERS, DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK SHALL BE FILED SEPARATELY AND CONCURRENTLY WITH THESE DOCUMENTS. EXISTING SECTOR ANTENNAS TO REMAIN EXISTING 105'-8" HIGH MONOPOLE TO REMAIN V.I.F. -- PROPOSED NEXTEL SECTOR ANTENNAS FASTENED TO T-ARM MOUNTING FRAME EQUIPMENT SHELTER TO REMAIN, -- PROPOSED ANTENNA CABLES TO BE ROUTED TO MONOPOLE WITHIN PROPOSED ELEVATED CABLE SUPPORT. PROPOSED GPS-I PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE LOCKAIBLE GATE TO MATCH EXISTING. PROPO~SED 12 X 20 EQUIPMENT ENCLO'SURE NEXTEL EQUIPMENT )SED BMR -PROPOSED BOLLARD EXISTING EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN NEW 4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING OVER MIRASCCAPE FILTER FABRIC WITH WOOD BORDER (SEE DETAIL 5/A-2), EXISTING CRUSHED STONE SURFACING PROPOSED GPS-2 PROPOSED NEXTEL SECTOR ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO PROPOSED QUAD-BRACKET STANDOFF T-ARMS MOUNTING FRAME BY 'VALMONT MICROFLECT' OR EQUAL. MOUNTING FRAME, BRACKETS, AND HARDWARE TO BE CONFIRMED BY NEXTEL RF ENGINEER AND MONOPOLE MANUFACTURER. (TYP, FOR 12) AT 80'-0" LEVEL TO ~ FOUNDATION OF EXISTING MONOPOLE (V,I,F.) EXISTING ~05'-8" HIGH MONOPOLE TO REMAIN (V.I,F.), PROPOSED ELEVATED CABLE SUPPORT. PROPOSED GPS-1 o,4,B' ,B' ENLAR G ED PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:I/8"= 1 '-0" SCALE:l/8"= 1 '-0" 1/8"--1'-0" X COX LANE (BEYOND) X 43'- 6" 20-8" NOTE; i SEE SITE PLAN, SP-1, FOR ANTENNA SECTOR HEADINGS. O' 4' B~ 16' ~/8"= u-o" EXISTING 6~-0" HIGH FENCE WITH 12'-0" WIDE DOUBLE GATE TO REMAIN, EXISTING GENERATOR TO REMAIN OF EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED, ELECTRICAL METER & DISCONNECT SWITCH MOUNTED 0 DIRECT TO EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. gu POURED CONCRETE LANDING. PROPOSED FENCE WITH 4'-0" WIDE GATE TO MATCH EXISTING. III -- PROPOSED NOMINAL 12'X20' EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE FOR NEXTEL EQUIPMENT. (4) 6"¢ PROPOSED BOLLARDS, PROPOSED BMR NORTH WILLIAM F, COLLIN,~ AIA ARC H I T E C T S, LLP 10-1 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ~,~I~LT~EI; NY 1F/33 VOICE: 6~1-(~-~4~) FAX: http://www.wfcala,¢om CONSULTANT' DAT~ ~ON FOR COORDINATION R NEXTEL / / COMMUNICATIONS PECONIC NORTH NY-2812 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY ELEVATION AND ENLARGED PLAN DAT~ PRQIECT NO.I 5122101 01-397& ~ DI~W/NO NO.: SP-2 2OF2 PLA_NNI~G BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR, JR. P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August13,2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 12, 2002. The final public hearing was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Nextel Communications is the lease holder and Arthur Junge is the owner of the property known and designated as Nextel Antenna Site, located on the north side of CR 48 in Cutchogue; and WHEREAS, this site plan for Nextel Communications is to affix a wireless telecommunications antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter; and WHEREAS, this site plan was certified by the Building Department on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, the Town Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this action is a Type II Action and not subject to review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617; and Nextel Communications - Pa.qe Two - 8/13/02 WHEREAS, a vadance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 25, 2002 to allow the placement of an equipment building at less than the required 70 feet from the rear property line; and WHEREAS, a final public hearing was closed on said application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated May 22, 2001 and last revised August 22, 2001, and authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys subject to a one year review from the date of the building permit. Enctosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman encl. cc: Building Dept., Tax Assessors PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~ SIDOR January 1 l, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Mr. George Obsuth Construction Project Manager Nextel Communications Two Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Re: Site Inspection of Nextel Communications County Road 48, Cutchogue, NY SCTM# 1000-96.-1-19.1 Dear Mr. O¢~uth, This is to inform you that our staffperformed a site inspection on January 7, 2005 of the site plan approved on August 12, 2002. In reference to the above, this is to inform you that the site plan requirements have been satisfied. This letter does not condone any changes from the approved site plan and approvals from other agencies if required. If there are any questions you can contact Bruno Semen at (631) 765-1938 x5019 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Southold Town Planning Chair CC:file Building Department SITE PLAN "----} Presub mission conference (xviLhin 30 days of written request) CompJete application received (~vithin 4 months of presub, conference) Application reviexvecl al work session (within 10 clays of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 lays o[ revie~v) Revised sub mission received ~ge ney Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: ng Board of Appealsk.t (,~ritten comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees , Suffolk County Department of Planning Department of Transportation -State ' Department of Transportation - County j~{3r Suffolk County Dept. of Health Fine Commissioners Draft Covenaots and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions ~Landscape olan ~ighting plan Curb Cut approval Sent:... Received' ~/~ ~vc d b y lin gille e r ,.~,~,W/'- Approval of site plan -v¢ith conditions l~ndorsement of sile [}Jail Cerlificnte of Occupancy hlspeclion ~ £7: One year review RICHARD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCHIE LA'I~AM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CI~EMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (G16) 765-3136 Telephone (516} 765-1938 Date Received Date Completed ,Filing Fee API:~CA'[ION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SIT~ PU~N New Change of Use Re-use . Extension Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Location: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for applicaMon: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared Ucense No.: Address: Telephone: Cutchoque Auto Precision North side of County Road 48, west of Cox Lane 21855 County Road 48~ Cutchogue Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications One South Street, Garden City, New York 11530 516-229-6836 Arthur V Junqe ...Lawrence C. Re, MUNLEY) MEA~E~ NIELSEN & RE' Attorneys ~or Applicant 36 North New York Avenue~ Huntinqton, New York 11743 631-425-4100 William F. Collins, AIA, Architects, LLP 015094 10-1Technolo§y.~rive~ Setauket~ New York 11733 631-689-8450 Page 2 Planning Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF ~Et~I~ NASSAU JOHN WALDEN being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at c/o One South Street, Garden Cits, New York 11530 In the S~teofNewYork, and thathelsthe ownerofthe above properS, or tha~helsthe Nexte] of New York, Inc. d/b/a Construction Specialist/ Of~I~A Nextel Communications mue)Proj ect Manager (Sp~l~ whether ~mhlp or Corp.) which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing sl;ructures or Improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entire parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed In strict accordance with the plans submitted, (w.! I Nextel of Ne~Y>~/;~d/b/a Nextel Communications ~, (Pa Construction Specialist/Project Manager Sworn to me this ~'~day of~_~TM . 2001. Notary Publ i~-J Sworn to me this day of (Notary Public} CAROLANN R, CAJUSl'~ I~Otary Public, Sta~e o~' New ~1~ No. 01C ",3£ 58769 i~l~11Oualified in Nassau County mission Expires April 15, PETER M. CASSERLY Nota,-y Publi~, State of New York No. 01CA4690126 Qualified In Suffolk County Commission Expires June 30, 2003' Page 5 P~nnlng Board Site Plan Application 4 5 t 5 8 9 Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) L ! Zoning Dlstdct Existing UseofSIte Cutchogue Auto Precision and Public Uti]it.y Wire]ess Te]ecemunications Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which building Facility will have which use. If more than one use Is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of floor area that will be reserved per use. Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility Affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to existinq monopole and install related equipment shelter. Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) · 2 4 0 Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 1~/.~ Percent of Lot for Parking (v~here applicable) ~,,/~ Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health Services - Case # & date 4(T~R: 4n~;) Case Number uv~y Name of Applicant 11/71/c11 Date of Decision .Expiration Date Other No Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIl APPROVAl OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. APPI, I(ZANT Tile Town of Sou. bh0.1d's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of '~te~es~ git the part of t6wn officers and emp~gyess. The purpose of this for[, is to provide information which can alert the town of possible collflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. ¥OUIt NAHI{ ~ Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications '(Last uame, ~lcat rams, ,,,t-~'l-~-initial, un~.eas you ~ce applying in the ~tame Of ~omsons slse othe~ entfty, euoh a~ a company. I~ so, il~d[cate the other pe~son's or company's n~me.) NATURE OF APPLICATION; (Checl{ all that apply.) Tax grievance Va r i a nee Change of zone Approval of plat Exemption from plat or o~fic[al map Other (If "Other," name the activity.) I)o you pereonally (oc tlltoogh youc (-~ompany, parent, OC eblld) hav~ a ~elatioaship employee of time Town of Soul;hold7 "l{elatiOnship" includes by blood, marriage, or bt~siness in~erest. ~hieb the to~n o~fieer YES NO X If you answered 'YES,". ~omplete the balance of this form and Name of person employed by the Town of Soutbold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself (tile applicator) ~t{H khm t-.n,.~n nFf{~or 0~' mm~3].ovee. Either check tile LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ARTHUR V. JUNGE, who holds title to the premises known as Section 96, Block 1, Lot 19.1 (the "Prernises") and does hereby give consent to Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications ('Nextel') and its representatives, to bring such applications for municipal approvals including, but not limited to, apphcation for Building Permit, application for Special Execption and application for Site Plan Approval, as may be necessary, to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to existing monopole and install related equipment shelter at at the Premises. As such, I will fully cooperate with Nextel and its ag~uts in obtaining any required approvals. ARTHUR V. JIYNG~ ] I AP13-850/065 SCALA P/~OFESSIONAL ANTENNA SYSTEMS For~ 6POADCASI" AND COMMUNIC~hONS AMERICELU 13 dBd gain 806-894 MHz (broadband) 0, 6, or 12° electrical downtilt AMEI~ICELL panels are pad of a series of Scala professional antenna products for wireless communications, featuring: · Less tower loading than eadier panel designs, thanks to smaller size and lighter weight. a Very rugged construction using materials selected for long life and reliability, including silver-plated copper dipoles, alodized aluminum backplate, and gray fiberglass radomes. · Superior electrical specifications including Iow VSWR, wide bandwidth, fiat frequency response and superb intermodulation pedormance. Specifications: Frequency range 806-894 MHz (broadband) Gain 13 dBd Impedance 50 ohms VSWR < 1.3:1 Intermodulation (2x40w) IM3: -150dBc IM5: -160dBc Polarization Vertical Front-to-back ratio >20 dB Maximum input power 500 watts (at 50°c) H-plane beamwidth 65 degrees (half-power) E-plane beamwidth 14 degrees (half-power) Electrical dowetilt 0, 6, or 12 degrees Termination N or 7/16 DIN female Weight 13.4 lb (6.1 kg) Dimensions 51 x 10 x 4 inches (1295 x 254 x 102 mm} Equivalent flat plate area 3.5 ~F (0.33 ms) Wind survival rating 120 mph (200 kph) Shipping dimeeeions 65 x 11 x 5 inches (1651 × 279 x 127 mm) Shipping weight 19 lb (8.6 kg) Mounting Fixed and tilt-mount options are available for 2 to 4.6 inch (50 to 115 mm) OD masts. Panel can be inverted. See reverse for order information. SCALA ELECTRONIC CORPORATION Post Office Box 4580 Phone: (541) 779-6500 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Fax: (541) 779-3991 http://www.scala.net 10035~E H-plane Ho~zonta~ p~lem - V-notarization E-plane Vertical pattern - V-polariz~on Scala Electronic Corporation is a member of the Katbrain Group SCALA AMB-7 Mounting Kit Mounting Options: Model Description Stock Code AMS-7 Mounting Kit for 2 to 4.6 inch 67175-007 (shown) (50 to 115 mm) OD mast. ASS-1 Throe-panel Sector Mounting Kit 67175-100 (120 deg. ea.) for 2.3751o 6 inch (601o 152 mm) OD mast. TB-SC Tilt Mount Kit 67450-052 0-15 degrees downtilt angle. Order Information: Model Description Stock Code AP13-650/065N Antenna with N termination 54355-406 0° electrical downtiit AP13-850/065N/DT6 Antenna with N termination 64355-408 6° electrical downtilt AP13~850/065N/DT12 Antenna with N termination 64355-410 12° electrical downtilt AP13-850/065D Antenna ~Vr~h 7/16 DiN termination 64355-407 0° electrical downtilt AP13-850/065D/DT6 Antenna with 7/16 DiN termination 64355-409 6° electrical downtiit AP13-850/065D/DT12 Antenna with 7/16 DIN termination 64355-411 12~ electrical downtiit AP13-850/065 65° PANEL ANTENNA 13 dBd gain 806-894 MHz (broadband) 0,06,° or 12° electrical downtilt ~_~0 inches~.~ 254 mm) ~ 51 inches (1295mm) SCALA ELECTRONIC CORPORATION Post Office Box 4580 Phone: (541) 779-6500 Medford, OR 97501 (USA) Fax: (541) 779-3991 http://www.scala.net All specifications are subject to change without notice 14'-16-2 C2,.'g7)-- 7 c 617.21 ; Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQ Purpose: The full EAF is desighed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proie~ or action may be signiticant. The question of whether an action,may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequen Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determi~' significance may have little or no formal knowledge et the environment or may be technically expert in environment; analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concern~ affectii~ the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatio process has be~n orderly, comprehensive in nature~ yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actiol Full EAF Components: The full EAF is 'comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given proiect and its site. By identifying basic proje( data,, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and .3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the i'ange of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provide guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be ¢onsi'dered small to moderate or whether it. is a pbtentialj'~ large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. : Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th impact is actually important. ~ L DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF Completed for this project: i'-I Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any Other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the · lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, there[ore, is one which will not · have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a signif'icant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures.~escribed in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepa'red. · ^ Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid Ior Unlisted Actions Proposed Nextel Commumications Public Utility Communications Facility - NY2812 Peconic North Name of Action Name of Lead Al:cncy Print or Type Name of ResponsibleOIficer in Lead A ency Title of Responsible OHicer Sit, nature of Responsibh: Officer in I.t:,~d At:~.ncy Sign.Hure ol Preparer Jif difierent from responsible oificer) PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significante on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consic -a~ part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public rev.iew. Provide any addit information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such ,';dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and sp each instance. NAME OF ACTION Pro~osed'Nextel Communications Public Utility Co--un[cations Facility NY2812 Peconic,.North 21855 Count.y Road 48t Cutch0.que~ Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR I SUSINESS TELEPHONE Nextel of New Y.o.~k Inc. d/b/a Nextel Co~unicatiPns I (516)229-3936 ADDRESS One South Street CITY/PO Garden City Arthur V Ounce STATE I ZIP CODE N~ 11530 SUSlNESS TELEPHONE (631) 477-3655 ADDRESS PO Box 299 CITY/PO Orient OESCnIPTION OF ACTION See At tach~mnt STATE t ZIP CODE NY 1 11957-0299 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site: E~escription Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas, 1. Present [and use: r-lUrban [-1Industrial ~Commercial r~-p.-~_es..idential (suburban) I-IForest . ' r-lAgriculture E:]Other 2. Total ~to~ project area: 200+- sq. ft. ~ Represents area to be APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, past. ute, otc.) acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECl.) acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 200+- sq. ft. ~m~ Roads. buildinl~s and other paved surfaces acres Other (Indicate type). ' acres i'-IRural [non-f leased o~ly. AFTER COMPLETIO act, acr acr acr acr act 200+- sq. ft. ~ 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaA Haven Loam, 0- 2 percent slope a. Soil (trainal~e: (~WelJ clrained . 100 % of r, ite I--IM,nlerately well drained % o( site ~Poorly draim,d % -( site b. if any agricultural land is involvcd, how many ecrus o~ s.d are ~'tassifivd ~vithin soil group 1 through .t of thf Land Class[Heat[on System? . ~/A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370), 4. Are [here bedrock outcroppings on plo[eot si[e? OYes ~. What is del)Ih to bedrock? 955~ (in leer) 2 5. Approximate percentage orproposec projec ~ite with slopes: ~U-10% 100 % 015% or ~reater . 6. Is project substantially conti~uou~ to, or contain a building, site. or district, listed on the State or the Natiol Registers of Historic Places~ ~Yes ~No ~7.-Is pro~ect substantially conti~uous to a site listed on the Re~ister of National Natural Landmarks~ ~Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table~ 50~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquffer~ ~Yes ~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area~ ~Yes ~No · 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangere ~Yes ~No Accordin~ to ~te,l~7 ~te Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project si[e~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formatiol OYes ~No Describe 13. Is the OYes [~1,'.4o It~ yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes []JNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Noz~e a. Name oi: Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name No~e b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities~ DYes C]No a) I1' Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation are b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~Yes ONo Oz~-s'[t:e .cbz3z~ect'io= . !~ 18. Is [he site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-A Section 303 and 304? OYes .l~lNo 19. Is the ~te" located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 OYes I~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wast'~?. OYes ~No C B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate} a, Total contiguous acreage owned or controlh:d by project sponsor 0 acres. sa. ft. b. Project. ~ to be developed: 200 +- SCl~.f~c.~ inili;,lly; 200 -_. sq. ft. ~ ultimately, c. Project acreal~e to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~/A (H a'ppropriate) e. II the proiect is an expansion, indicate peru~,nt o~ ~xpansi~m proposed %; [ Number o~ of~-street parkinl~ spaces existim: 0 g. Maximum vehicular trips grail:rated per~h_ h. l[ rcsidentiah Numbt~r and tyl)e o~ hnusinl: units: One Family Two Fanul¥ ImliaJiy _ Uhim;Jely i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed str[Icture ~ height; . j. Linear leer ol ~rontage along a public thornugh~a~e project will occupy 3 propr~5ed · ' *ozze per (upon comphHion of project)? to c;heck equ3.pmeat MHhiple I'alnily Condominium widlh: __ lenEth. N/A ft. See Attachment' 2. How much natural ma I (i.e., reck. earll~, etc.) will be remov,d from the sde? 0 tons/cubic yar( 3. ,Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [Yes []No ~]N/A a. If yes, for what intend_,~ purpose is the site beirut reclaimed? b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes [-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other IocaUy-important vegetation be removed by this proiect? [~Yes E]No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 month~, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated .. (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 ._' month c: Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [~Yes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I-lYes ~.No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction_ 3-+' 10. Number of lobs eliminated by this proiect .... 0 11. Will project require relocation 'of any projects or facilities? [Yes year, (including demolitio nNo ; after proiect is Complete 0 ~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ~No (unmanned facility) a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.} and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes [~No Type (unmanned facilit 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? . [Yes ~hlo Explain --~ 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ~Yes ~iNo 16. Will the. project generate solid waste? i-lYes ~No (unmanned. facility) a. If',/es, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? OYes f-INo c. If yes, give name ; Ioca~TOn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? fl-lYes e. If Yes, explain ONo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~-IYes a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 1§. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?' ~'es Ions/month. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more II,an on*~ hour per day)" [-JYes 20. Will project produce operatint~ noise ~xceedi,l: the local ambient .oise levels? 21. Will project result in an increase in ~m,trgy tm~e~ ~Yes I~ yes , indicate type(s) ~i~mal increase .in electricity 22. I[ water supply i~ from w,:ll~, i,tcJicat~? pumpmn cain,city .~/A g,dh;ns/mmute. 23. Total auticipated wah~r Usagt! per (J;Iy 0 24. Does prolect involve Local. SI,lie or Federal lundim:? If Yes. explain gallo.s/day. (unmanned facility) OYes ~No 4 ~No .25. Approvals Required: City, Town, village Board [~]Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board I~Yes DNa -City, Town Zoning Board ?tl~ Yes ENo City, County Health Department I-lYes fXlNo Other Local Agencies EYes ~No Other Regional Agencies I-IYes ~]No State Agencies DYes ~]No Federal Agencies I-lYes I~o C. Zoning and Planning Information Submittal Type Date Site Plan A~proval 1. Does proposed action involve a planning.or zoning decision? [~Yes [3No · If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment Dzonfng variance I-Isp,ecial use permit ~lsubdivision IX'lsite plan E]new/revision of master plan ~]resource management plan [~]other .... 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ... LJ.~zht Tndustr¥ 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning.~ Site is developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change proposed 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zonin~l{' N/A C 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans{' ' IL'lYes I-lb: 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed A~ricultural, Municipal (Collection Center) Co~nercial, Residential/A-C, L1, L10, B 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a I/~ mile{' I~lYes r3N 9. If the gr(~posed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed1 N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'!ekver or water districts{' DYes []b 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any commonity provided services (recreation. education, polic fire protection}{' I-~Yes ~]No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projc"cted demand? C]Yes [-1No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantI, y above present levels{' D-lyes ~IN a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic~ [3Yes DNa D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may he n'eeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverl impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and Ihe measures which ymi propose to ~nitigate avoid d~em. C E. Verification I certify tllat ti1(: infornhltion i)rovkh,d ahoy,, is tru<! to th(! best of my knowled~;e. / Nextel (~ommuni~ations by Freudenthal Apnlic,mt/Snousor~,l~me ~ll~nw4t~. ~nn~nltin~ Group, Inc. Date July ~ 2001 · · -. Title Pro0 ect Manager Sig n~ure ~, G~ Watral/ lite .tclimt is in the Coaslal Area, and yo. nrc a ~late agency, complete U~e Coaslal Assessment Form helore proceedi~ wilh this assessmenl. 5 ~ Nc~e 2 ~ ~..E lectr ica, l~; K-~Plan Q ~<=~1~: I/4" -- I'-0" NOTE: I. The C. abl~ ladder ~hall b~ Unl-~rut, ~ or approved equivalent ~ ail ~o~ Ea~ clr~lt ~II ~lnl~ Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town _of Southold Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12 (twelve) communications antennas to the existing 105± foot above grade level (agl) monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated communications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.l.i Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long. The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will be attached to the existing 105± foot monopole at a height of 80~- feet agl, extending to 82± feet agl. SITE NAME: SITE #: DATE NEEDED BY: MODEL:OTHER S PECI AL DETAILS: [] Z./ DATE ORDERED: PROJECT MANAGER EXTERIOR FINISH: MANUFACTURER:KULLMAN o ~opt o ID~OP3 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 10/12/01 Transaction(e): ReceipUf: 1023669 Subtotal 1 Application Feee $217.50 Check#: 1023669 Total Paid: $217.50 Clerk ID: Nextel Comm. Sctm # 1000-96,1 - 19.1 JO¥CEW Somha{d Towr, Plan ning Board Internal ID: ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Cl~dr RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L, EDWARDS e MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOAHI) OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave,) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 December 7, 2004 Mr. George Obsuth Construction Project Mgr. Nextel Communications Two Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Dear Mr. Obsuth: RE: SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 The Planning Board held a work session on December 6, 2004 at which they accepted the shrub replacement proposed in your November 17 letter. Please let us know when the project is completed so that we may schedule a site visit inspection. Very truly ygurs, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer cc: Planning Board ~ [ N=rtheast, Site Development & Engineerings, November 17, 2004 Mr. Bruno Simone Town of Southold Planning Department 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Nextel Cornmunications Site # NY2812 Peconic North 21855 Old Contry Road 48 Cutchogue NY 11706 Dear Mr. Simone, It's my suggestion that we replace the dead Arborvitae with Red Cedar in its place. The Arborvitae appears to have died due to lack of water and sandy soil conditions. As observed the Red Cedar is indigenous to the area and should thrive very well under these conditions. Moving forward, please notify of your approval. Gedrge Ob~uth Nextel Communications Construction Project Manager 2 Industrial Avenue Fairfield, NJ 07004 Mobile 973-418-9002 HIGHLANDER CONSULTANTS, INC. September 24, 2004 Planning Board Office, Town of Southold P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Ms. Valerie Sculpaz Re: Permit No. 29861Z 21855 CR 48, Cutchogue Our Pile No: NY2812 Dear Ms. Sculpaz: Please schedule a final planning inspection for the above referenced site. A copy of the Building Permit is enclosed herewith. Also enclosed is a copy of the letter from the planning board dated August 13, 2002, indicating that the resolution was approved. Please advise us of when this final inspection will be effected so that we may obtain a final certificate of occupancy. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Cc: Building Inspector Town of Southold 99 West Main Street, East Islip, N. E 11730 (630 581-8105 Office, (63D 581-8205 Fax (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON T~E PRR24/SE$ UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) 4,7.1 ~610 P.l~3 P~/~IT No. _ ~29861 Z Da~e ~O_%~ER 1.0, 20.03 ~erm~ssion ie hereby ~ranted to: PO BOX 299 ORIENT,NY 11957 CO_-LOCATI~ON O_F AN ~/~..ENNA ON A/~ EXISTINg_ TgLECO~MMUNI_CATIONS T~W~R .... at pre~%ses located at ~ 21855_, _CR_48_ _ .C~3TCROGUE . ~y T~ ~ No. ~73~89 Sectio~ 09~ ~l~k 0001. ~t NO. 019..901 . ~s,,~nt to 'a~li~tion ~ted NO--ER. ~, 2093 ~ ~p~ ~ ~ ~il~ I~ector t~ ~i~ on ~ 1O, 2005. F~ $ :_ . 200.00 ~~ COPY TOTAL P. e3 09/23/2004 13:39 5314254104 FROM : SDdTHOLD TOWN PLP, N~ING~RD BOARD MEMBl~R~ BENN ~-TI' ORLO%%'~F~, JR. RICHARD WlLLIAh{ J, MARTIN $1DOR, MUNLEYMEAD FAX NO, 611. 765 5136 PLANNIN(~ BOAI~D OFFICE TOWN 0F SOUTHOLD PAGE 01 P.O. I:oz 1179 Town Hall, 530.~6 State Ro~t~ 2~ ~u~oM, N~ Yo~k 11971~69 T~ne (.~l) 7~-1938 F~ (68D 7~-31~6 August 13, 2002 Jacqueline Caputl, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 700' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogu~. SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: El, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputl: The following rei;olution was adopted b~ the Southoid Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 12, 2(~02. The final public hearing was dosed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Nextel Communications is fire lease holder and Arthur Junge is the owner of the property known and designated aS Nek-tel Antenna Site, located on the r,orth side of CR 48 in Cutchogue; and : WHEREAS, this site plan for Nextel Communications is to affix · wi~eless telecommunications antenna fo an existing monopole and install · related equipment shelter; and ~ WHEREAS, this site plan was certified bY the Bullcllng Department on August '12. 2002; and WHEREAS, the TOWn Engineer has reviewed the drainage calculations and the Planning Board has accepted his hi, commendation for approval; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board has determined that this actio,1 is a Type II A~lon and not subjec~ to review:under the State Environmental Quali~ Review Act, (Article 8), Part 017; end 09/2B/200~ 19:3~ $31~2Sd10~ F~OM : SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING~D ~UNLEY~E~D FAX N~. ~, 631' 765 3136 PAGE 02 30 2003 02!:36PM P3 Next~ C. omm~rtications - Page Two. - 8113/02 WHEREAS, a vedance was granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on Jury 2b, '.~.002 to allow the placement of an equipment building at lass than tl~e required 70 feet ~ronl the rear property line; and WHEREAS, a final public headng was olosed on said application at Town Hall, Southold, New York on August 12, 2002; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval on the surveys, dated May 22, 2001 and last revised August 22, 2001, and authorize Chairman to endome the final surveys ~ubject to a one year review from the d~te of the building permit. Enclosed please find two copies of the approved site plan; one fOr your record~ and one to be submitted to the Building Departnlent when you aPl~ly for your building p~.rrrttt. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Var7 truly yours, ariel, cc: Building Dept., Tax Assessors ~! ~ 4,4" I 34.$" EXISTING ~ED AT THE ~.~ONAL ~SURVEY C. CIVIL f APPRO PLANNIN~ TO~,~/N OF ~k~r fED BY ~ BOARD ;OUTHOLD :ATIONS PECONIC NORTH NY-2812 COUNTY ROAD 48 CUTCHOGUE, NY SITE PLAN L&/W.K. ~3976 Submission IFtthoul a Co~r~ . fe~ _~ Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Date: Corn, merits: Cross-State construction Corp. GENERAL cONTRACTORS cONSTR/TiON MANAGEMENT *TELECOMMUNtCATIONS 141 Lafayette Avenue Suflern, NY 10901 845-369-3745 845.369-3746 Fa~ CHARLES cOMO 914.494-4635 Mobile E.m~;~t: chtfle¥.oomO ~ crossstate'C°m NOV 14 2003 Southold Town Plaonin~ Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF $OUTHOLD MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Planning Board Chairman FROM: Michael J. Verity, Building Department DATE: August 12, 2002 $outhold Town Pianninn Board REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Arthur Junge (NEXTEL) Location: 21855 County Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000 - Section 9~6 - Block 1 - Lots 18.1 Date: May 22, 2001 Revised Date: August 22, 2001 1. ALL BUILDiNGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. *THE PROPOSED USE wireless communication equipment facility IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS LI DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. * See Board of Appeals Appl. No. 5127 for setbacks. Michael J. Verit~ v Principal Building Inspector MEMO TO: FROM: CC: DATE: RE: Michael Verity, Building Department Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman /~/~ Betty Neville, Town Clerk August 12, 2002 Apph No. 5127 - Nextel (A. Junge, Owner) Findings, Deliberations and Determination This memo will correct the error in the Determination for Application No. 5127 - Nextel dated July 25, 2002 to read as follows: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: equipment shelter building at 30 feet (not 38 feet). Kindly reflect your file to read same. Thank you. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Lydia A. Tortora George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 25, 2002 Southold Town Hall "~_~ 53095 Main Road r/~ P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 Appl. No. 5127 - NEXTEL (A. Junge, Owner) Southold Town Property Location: 21855 C.R. 48 (Middle Road), Cutchogue Parcel: 96-1-19.1 Plann!~ ~ SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned as a setback request. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's property is located on the north side of C.R. 48 in Cutchogue, with 45,589 sq. ft. of land area and road frontage of 168.17 ft. The property is immediately adjacent to the Landfill at the north side. To the west are residences, and to the east, vacant land. The property is located in the Light Industrial Zone District and improved with an existing Telecommunications Tower, and business buildings. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's March 6, 2002, Amended March 11, 2002 Notice of Disapproval denying a permit to construct' an equipment shelter (storage building) for the reason that the building is proposed in a location at less than 70 feet from the rear property line. FI[ND1NGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on July 25, 2002, at which time written and oral evidence was presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property and the area, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant. _~)0 , AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQueSTED: Applicant s request a location of a proposed 12'8" x 20'8" equipment shelter building at ~8~ feet from the rear property line. This shelter building is shown at the northwest section of the property near the existing one-story masonry building and existing monopole structure. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted, and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the area variance will not produce an undesirable change in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The Telecommunications Law requires co-location on existing towers. This property contains an existing tower, and applicant's proposed a co-locate of an antenna in accordance with the codes. The need for an equipment shelter building is in support of the co- location. The existing Telecommunications Tower sits approximately 41 feet to the rear property line, and there is a need for this building to be as close to the tower as possible. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance because of environmental constraints and because the proposed location is the most beneficial to the applicants and the neighborhood. The requested variance is not Page 2 - July 25, 2002 ZBA Appl, No. 5127 - Nextel 96-1-19.1 at Cutchogue unreasonable and is within keeping of the many regulations pertaining to public utility uses and transmission towers. 3. The area variance is not substantial, will be one-story in height, and exceeds the setback requirements which apply to similar types and designs of accessory storage structures in this and all other zone districts. 4. The proposed variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. No evidence has been submitted to suggest the new location of the equipment shelter structure will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The applicant will provide landscaping for buffering, to screen outside of the fence area. The Board suggests five-font arborvitae, planted four feet apart, to be continuously maintained. However, the Board reserves the right to review this buffering layout if screening is not adequately followed by applicant relative to this particular area. 5. In considering this application, the Board deems this action to be the minimum necessary and adequate for the applicants to enjoy the benefit of a new accessory equipment shelter, and that the grant of this variance will preserve the character of the neighborhood, and the health, safety, welfare of the community. BOARD RESOLUTION: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Tortora, seconded by Chairman Goehringer, and duly carried, to: GRANT the variance as applied for, and shown on the site plan drawings SP-land SP-2 dated 5/22/01, revised 8/22/01, by William F. Collins, A.I.A. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ~le~'~oe~r (C~ai~an), Tortora, Horning, and Orlando. (Member Oliva was absent.)~ ~'l~V~ld//y/~ (4-0). GG:ak ~erard f 8-1-02 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 9, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Rd 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on August 12, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBI~ BENNETT ORLOWSK/, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 14,2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the $outhold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, May 13, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on June 10, 2002 at 6:00 p,m, Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, i, Jr~_ ~" Chairman ~' PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORL©WSK~, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGG1ANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-'19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on May 13, 2002 at 6:00 p.m, Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCI-IIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 12, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Rb 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re; Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, March 11, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on Apdl 8, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 12, 2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & Rb 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY' 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-%19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, February 11, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the SouthOld Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on March 11,2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Chairman MUN'r,EY, MEADE~ NIELSEN & 1~ (631) 42~-4100 (631) 425-4104 January 29, 2002 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Chairman Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Planning Board Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cuthchogue, New York 11935 SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Dear Chairman Orlowski: We are the attorneys for Nextel Communications, the applicant for Site Plan Approval in the above matter. The application last appeared on the Planning Board's agenda on January 14, 2002. At that time, the hearing was held open until the February 11, 2002 meeting to allow the applicant time to research the necessity for an area variance. We are in the process of preparing an application to the Board of Zoning Appeals. For that reason, kindly continue to hold this matter open on the Planning Board's calendar until such time as the Zoning Board has made its determination. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RE Jacqueline Caputi MUNI,F.Y~ MEADE~ NIELSEN (631) 425-4100 January 16, 2002 VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL Department of Planning, Attn: Carol Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cuthchogue, New York 11935 SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Southold Town Plannin[l Board Dear Carol: In accordance with our phone conversation of today's date, enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting, certified mail receipts and the two green cards that were returned to us. My client is exploring the option of relocating its equipment shelter. If that is not possible, we will promptly make an application to the Zoning Board for the necessary variance. Accordingly, kindly keep this matter on the Planning Board's agenda for the February 11, 2002 meeting and I will advise you prior to that time of our intentions. Thanking you for your courtesies, we remain Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & RI~ By: /ac~ ~4~ Jacqueline Caputi /jc Enclosure AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I ~ersonally posted the property known as Cutchogue Auto Precision, 21855 County Road 48, Cutchosue, New York by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 'i0 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained In place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on January 14, 2002 I I~ve sent.notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on January 2. 2002 Gale V. Jeffery* Julte L. Miknis** Your name (print) Signa~'ure ~ Lake Grove' New York 11755 / 32 Grant Place. GLen Cnve. M,w VmrW 11547 Address January 11, 2002 Date Notary Public PLEASE £ETU£N I-NIS AFFIDA ~1T AND CERTIFIED MAll RECEIPI?_¢ ON THE DAY OF. OR AT TNE PUBLIC HEARING Re: Proposed site plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date of Hearing:Mon., January 14. 2002, 6:10 p.m. Nextel of New York~ Inc d/b/a Nextel Communicationg Application for Site Plan Approval Town of Southold LIST OF NAMES: 1) 096-01-018.03 Jennie Harris Est. c/o Larry Taylor P.O BOX 373 Cutchogue, NY 11935 2) 096-01-020.01 Joseph Schoenstein 305 Leeward Dr. Southold, NYl1971 3) 096-02-008 Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 · Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Pdnt your name and address on the reverse ~l so that we can return the card to you. Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the froct if space permits. 1. Article Addrsssed to: I~- m r-1 J] O~ ~t ~gTt L US [] Agent i'"l Addressee 2. tcgao /, %-0'~° U~tlT ID: 07q4 Postmmk Hem Clerk: KBH3YX 01/02/02 0 3 2002 [] NO Postage II/IT ID: 07~ =ertifled Fee i R Postmark ~ C~ifl~ Ma ~ EXeS Mail Um R~ . ~ Mail D C.O.D. I ~ 4. Restrict~ Delive~? (~t~ F~) ~Yes ~ · 1~ . ~ . ~1~ · - ( .~ . i ~ 2. A.icleNumber ~lO ~CC~ ~ r~ ~ I/ . ~&-z&~J.~.~l.l.~_..~.. ................. . 2. Article Number (Transfer from service labe0 PS Form 3811, August 2001 ~ Expos Mail .2,102. i0 ) ,sd'~ Cle~: ~(B83YX PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 15,2002 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48,750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, January 14, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board hold open the final public hearing regarding the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications, which was opened on January 14, 2002. The next regularly scheduled Planning Board Meeting will be held on February 11, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact this office if your have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~,~ Chairman Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-1823 Telephone (631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planner From: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Re: Nextel Communications - Junge Property SCTM: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date: January 14, 2002 Preexisting towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently exist. New construction shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure is located. Therefore, the proposed equipment facility requires a variance for the rear yard setback. 2002 ' Southold 'l'own Board JOSHUA Y. HORTON SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD Fax. (516)-765-1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Tel.(516)-765- 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 14, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: NEXTEL Communications State Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000 - 96 - 01 - 19.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Southold Town Pia~ming Board As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan dated 05/22/01 that was prepared by the office of William F. Collins, AIA for the above referenced project. The project includes the installation of a new equipment shed for the existing facility. This shed will be used to expand the capabilities of the existing monopole tower located at the site. The drainage requirements to handle a two inch rainfall falling on a two hundred square foot shed would be minimal. Due to the size of the lot and the amount of existing landscaping surrounding the proposed project additional drainage structures would not be recommended. If you have any questions concerning this repo~, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax(631) 765-1823 Telephone(631) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Victor L'Eplattenier, Senior Planner From: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Re: Nextel Communications - Junge Property SCTM: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date: January 14, 2002 Preexisting towers shall be allowed to continue their usage as they presently exist. New construction shall adhere to the setbacks for principal uses in the Bulk Schedule applicable to the zone in which the structure is located. Therefore, the proposed equipment facility requires a variance for the rear yard setback. JOSHUA Y. HORTON ~ SUPERVISOR TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN R. OAD Fax. (516)-765- 1366 JAMES A. RICHTER, R.A. ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK I 1971 Tel.(516)-765 -1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 14, 2002 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: NEXTEL Communications State Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM #: 1000 - 96 - 01 - 19.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: JAN 3L ~ 2~2 Southold Town Planning Board As per your request, I have reviewed the site plan dated 05/22/01 that was prepared by the office of William F. Collins, AIA for the above referenced project. The project includes the installation of a new equipment shed for the existing facility. This shed will be used to expand the capabilities of the existing monopole tower located at the site. The drainage requirements to handle a two inch rainfall falling on a two hundred square foot shed would be minimal. Due to the size of the lot and the amount of existing landscaping surrounding the proposed project additional drainage structures would not be recommended. If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact my office. CC: Peter Harris (Superintendent of Highways) faosimile TRA N S H ITTA L Re: PageS: (Including cover) Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Rd. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (516) 765-1938 Fax#: (516) 765-3136 BOARD OF APPEAL~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 28, 1998 JUN "t 1998 Lawrence Ray, Esq. Muniey Meade Nielsen & Re 160 Middle Neck Road Great Neck, NY 11021 Southold Town Planning Board RE: Nextel Co-Location of Antennas 1000-108-4-11.3 Dear Mr. Ray: This will confirm that at our May 14, 1998 Regular Meeting, the entire Board discussed your application for a Special Exception to affix three whip antennas to existing telecommunications tower and to place accessory shed and pad with two GPN antennas and one BMR antenna mounted on shelter. Based on Sections 100-233B, the Board determined that the Town of Southold's 1997 Telecommunications Act supersedes its previous rulings under Nos. 4022SE and 4023 (which conditions required a new special exception review. ) At the same time, the Board rescinded the former Rer~olution which had calendared this application for a public hearing. Board Member(s) suggested that you are now in a position to mal~e application with the Building Department for a building permit review under other provisions of law for this project. GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN Enclosures (Applieation)~ cc:- Planning Board ~ Town Cie~k (Re: ~4753) Building Department PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of January, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Robert Schreiber. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, approximately 350' west of the intersection of Alvah's Lane & Oregon Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Gerard Goehringer/Agnes McGunnigle. SCTM#1000-106-6-14 is located on the northeast corner of Bay View Avenue & Cox Neck Road; SCTM#1000-106-6-16.2 is located on the north side of Bay View Avenue in Mattituck. 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for~he property is located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6:15 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Pellegrini Vineyards. The property is located at 23005 Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Dated: 12/14/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3, 2002 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE, THANK YOU. COPIES SENT TO: The Suffolk Times P.O. Box 1179 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Phone: (631) 765-1938 Fax: (631) 765-3136 E-Maih planning@southold.org To: The Suffolk Times From.' Valerie Scopaz/Carol Fax: Pages: 2 Phon~ Date: 12/14/01 Re: Legal Ad for 1/3/02 Edition cc: Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply As Requested Please pdnt the following legal ad in the 1/3/02 edition. Thanks. Meeting: 1/14/02 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Robert Schmiber Minor Subdivision 6:05 p.m. Goehdnger/McGunnigle Lot Line Change 6:10 p.m. Nextel Communications Site Plan 6:15 p.m. Pellegdni Vineyards Site Plan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, $outhold, New York in said Town on the 14th day of January, 2002 on the question of the following: 6:00 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision of Robert Schreiber. The property is located on the north side of Oregon Road, approximately 350' west of the intersection of Alvah's Lane & Oregon Road in Mattituck. SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed lot line change for Gerard Goehringer/Agnes McGunnigle. SCTM#1000-106-6-14 is located on the northeast corner of Bay View Avenue & Cox Neck Road; SCTM#1000-106-6-16.2 is located on the north side of Bay View Avenue in Mattituck. 6:10 P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Nextel Communications. The property is located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6:15' P.M. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Pellegrini Vineyards. The property is located at 23005 Main Road in Cutchogue. SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Dated: 12/14/01 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) CAROL KALIN, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York being duly sworn, says that on the 14th day of December, 2001 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of $outhold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board~ Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 1114/02 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the Minor Subdivision of Robert Schreiber SCTM#1000-95-1-4 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the Lot Line Change of Goehdnger/McGunnigle SCTM#1000-106-6-14 & 16.2 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the Site Plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the Site Plan for Pellegrini Vineyards SCTM#1000-109-1-8.7 Carol Kalin Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this / "/¢Z'-day of ,~z.c~/_,.~, 2001. Notary Public UNDA d. COOPER N~,~ Public, State of New Yo~k __. 4=22ss3, s~.county Town of Southold, a public hearing will ~ held by the Southold Town Planmng Board. at the Town Hail. Main Roac. Southold, New '(0~ ,~{j ~T.~ w..~ ~3~ ~he ~as6:00 p,m, Public Hearing for the pro- ed~i~r subdivision of Robert $chreibeL The property is located on the noah side of Oregon Road approx- ni6f61~, 330' 4)e~ ~f the ~inter~ction of AIvah's Lane & 0~ggon Road in J'*~6~P~n~-~t~oI~arin$ for the pro- it. Jine for Gerard SCTM Iocat- of Cox's #1000-96. t~19.1 . ;::: 6~!5,p'm~ ~bli¢ Heating for thepro. posed site plan for Pellegrini V neyards. ~te pr6peay s !°Cated at ~3005 Main Road in Cutchogue: SCTM fff1000-109- 1-8.7 Dated! ]2/14/01 $¥~ PLANNING BO~ Bennett Orlow~ki, Jr., Chailman 2152-1TJ3 STATE OF NEW YORK) )SS: [~r~.~'--~.P~_~>Y./-~of Mattituck, in said county, being duly sworn, says that he/she is Principal clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a weekly newspaper, published at Mattituck, in the Town of Southoid, County of Suffolk and State of New York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been regularly p.ublished in said Newspaper once each week for { weeks succes- ~commencing 20©c-~ - ~.).XJ3.~ on thee. ~ day Principal ~lerk ~ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O, Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 11, 2001 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Munley, Meade, Nielsen & R6 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed amended site plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industrial Dear Ms. Caputi: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday December 10, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the S0uthold Town Planning Board set Monday, January 14, 2002, at 6:t0 p.m. for a final public hearing on the maps dated May 22, 2001. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board office, Southold town Hall. Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting, proof of certified mailing, and the signed green return receipts from the certified mailings on the day of the public hearing before 4:00 p.m. The sign and the post need to be returned to the Planning Board office after the public hearing. A copy of the Negative Declaration is enclosed for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREiVIERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971~0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant December 10, 2001 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: SCTM#: Location: SEQR Status: Proposed site plan for Nextel Communications 1000-96-1-19.1 CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is to affix a wireless telecommunications antenna to an existing monopole & install a related equipment shelter. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. SEQR Ne,qative Declaration - Pa,qe Two For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631) 765-1938 cc: Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Applicant Southold Town Piannin.q Board Notice to Adjacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1; 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the L-I (Light Industrial) Zoning District; That the application is an amendment to affix a new wireless antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter on 1.05 acres of property located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane in Cutchogue; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, January t47 2002 at 6:10 p.m. in the Meetin.q Hall at Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. PetitionedOwner's Name(s): Nextel Communications/Arthur Junge Date: 12/14/01 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notices(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail, the receipts of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across from any public or private street from the above mentioned property on Your name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RET'URN TI-lIS AFFIDA VIT AND CEleTIFIED MAIL £ECEIPT..,c ON TIlE DAY OF. 0£ AT TNE PUBLIC NEARING Re: Proposed site plan of Nextel Communications SCTM#: 1000-96-1-19.1 Date ofHearing:Mon., January 14, 2002, 6:10 p.m. '§ 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAPJNG § 58-1 . Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Providing notice of public hearings. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995, Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Providlng notice of public hearings. Whenever the ~e ~ for a pubic h~ th~ s~ion ~ apply. U~n de~i~ that ~ ~p~on ~ the ~ or ~sion ~e~ the z~e sh~ ~ a ~e ~d pla~ for a pubic h~ ~e~n. ~e bo~ or re~e~ng ~ appli~tion shah pr0~de for the ~ of noti~: A. By ~us~g a nati~ ~g the ~e, da~, pla~ ~d na~e of the he~g ~ ~ pubHsh~ ~ the ne~pa~r ~t~ the ~fi~ p~b~ by law. B. By re~g the appH~t ~ e~ the ~ p~d~ by the ~, which sh~ ~ pm~en~y ~p~y~ on the p~es fang ~ch public or p~ s~t w~ch the p~ ~vol~ ~ ~e appH~on ~u~, ~g no~ of the appH~on, the na~ of the appm~ sou~t th~by ~d the t~e ~d p~ of the public h~ th~n. ~e s~ ~h~ ~ ~t back n~ mom th~ (10) f~ ~m the p~ ~e. ~e s~ sh~ ~p~ for a ~ ~ not l~s ~ s~n (7) imm~a~ p~ing ~e ~ of ~e pubic ~e appH~t or ~ ~nt sh~ ~e ~ ~da~t ~at ~e h~ ~pH~ ~th t~ p~ion. C. By ~ the appH~t ~ send no~ W the o~e~ of ~ of eve~ pm~ w~ch kbu~ ~d pm~ which h a~ss ~m ~ pubhc or ~ sW~t 5801 t-u-~ . § 58~1 SOUTHOLD CODE § 58-1 from the property included in the application. Such notice shall be made by certified mail, return receipt requested, posted at least seven (7) days prior to the date of the initial public hearing on the application and addressed to the owners at the addresses listed for them on the local ~ssessment roil. The applicant or agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. ARTHUR JUNG NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 1000-96-1-19.1 Site Plan Amendment to affix a new wireless antenna to an existing monopole and install a related equipment shelter. MON. - JANUARY 14, 2002 - 6:10 P.M. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, ,IR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 6, 2001 Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Muntey, Meade, Nielsen & R~ 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, NY 11743 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Nextel Communications Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutchogue SCTM#1000-96-1-19.1 Zone: LI, Light Industry Dear Ms. Caputi: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, November 5, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincerely, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 ,2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ('~ Unlisted Contact Person: ~.. ~" ~ ~ 5' 5- ,,.?"~--~.~._ (631) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (,./~ This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Comments: - Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Chairman co: Board of Appeals ~ Building Department NYSDEC - Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Public Works ~homas Cyh, ,!ekL D~v~d ........ ~, ~ ..... ~~Administrator Suffolk County W=tcr Auth~ *Maps are enclosed for your review C ; 4~-16-2 (2187}--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The fuji EAF is desighed to help applicants and agencies determine· in an orderly manner, whether a pre or action may be significant, The question of whether an action.may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frecl~ Iy. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who detem significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environm, analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concem~ affe. the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that thedetermin~ process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature· yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or ac Full EAF Components: The full EAF is 'comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic pre data,, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Fo~:uses on identifying the i'ange of possible impacts 'that may occur from a project or action. It prov guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be Considered small to moderate or whether it is a pbtenti large impact. The form also identifies whether.an impact can be mitigated or reduced. ' :i Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate ivhether or n~l impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Idenlify Ihe Portions of EAF Compleled for this project: I~ Part 1 E] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this £AF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and an)' o'ther supportJn information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably dete'rmined by th lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) ?nd, therefore, is one which will nc [3 -have a significant impac( on the environment, therefore a negalive declaration will be prepared. 6. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significa~ effect for this Unlisted A. ction because the mitigation measure~escribed in PART 3 have been requirec therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be Prepa~dd~* C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impac on the environment therefore a positive declaration will he prepa'red. * ^ Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Proposed Nextel Communications Public Utility Co~m~unications Facility NY2812 Pmconic North Name o Action Name of Lead AHency Prinl or Type Name of Reslxmsible OI ricer in Lead AI.tency Title of Responsible OIficer 5il4natuu: of Responsible Oiiicc'r in I.e,~d A~.:mJcy Sign,~ture ol Preparer iii diflerent from responsible office PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is desighed to assist in determinin[ whether ~he acUon proposed may have a si8ni[icar on the environmenL Please complete the eniire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these ~ue~tions will be car ~ part of the applicaLion Car approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any ad information you believe will be needed ~o comple[~ Par[~ 2 and 3. It i~ expected that completion of ~he Cull EAr will be dependent on informaHon currenuv available and will not new studieJ, research or investigation, ff information requirin8 such ~dditional work is unavailable, so indicate and each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed Nextel Communications Public Utility Communications Facility NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County RoAd 48, CutchoqueL~uffolk NAME OF APPLICANTrSPONSOR Neztel of New York [ac. d/b/a Nextel Communicatio'ms ADDRESS Oma South Street I EUSINESS TELEPHONE (516 t229-3936 CITY/PO STATE I aP COOl Garden City N~fI 11530 NAME OF OWNER (n dlnerenl) Arthur V Junge J ADDRESS IPO Box 299 J SUSINEaSTELEPHONE 1631 ) 477-3655 CITYIPO J STATE J ZIPCOOI Drient ...... NY 11957-02 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION See At tach.ant Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. ii not applicable A. Site~ E~escription Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land .use: rlUrban r-)Industrial II~lCommercial L-~..es..identlal (suburban) rlRural I-IForest l-lAgriculture ~Other .. 2. Total ~to~ project area: 200-+ sq. ft. ~ l~epresents area to be leased o~ly. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLE1 Meadow or Brushland [Non-agricultural) acres Forested acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, utc,) acres , Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 2,1. 2.5 of ECI.] acres Water Surface Area acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or till) 200+. sq. ft. Roads. buildings and other p,~ved sur(aces acres 200-+ sq. J~t. ; Other (Indicate type) acres 3. What is predominant soll typuis) on project site~' HaA Haven Loam, 0- 2 percent slo'~e a. Soil draina~:e: I~Well drained 100 % of ~ite ~Mn(lerately well dra'inerl % of sit~ ~PooH'¢ (Irainl,d % .[ site b. It any agricLiILural kmd is involved, how many at:res of SOl( are ("J,tssiJil.,(I ~vithin soil group 1 through -I Land Classification System? .,N/A. acres. (See 1 NY(:RR 370). ' 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project sile? COYes ..,~. What is deplh to bedrock? 955-+ (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percenta~ proposed project ~ite witl, slopes: []i0-10 ~15% or ~reater 6. Is proiec[ substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, si[e, or dis~rict, listed on the StaLe or the Na Registers of Historic Places~ ~Yes ~No ~7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Re~ister of National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table~ 50~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifed ~Yes 10. Do hunting, fishin8 or shell fishin8 opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~Yes 11. Does,proiect site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened, or enda~ According to, 2te~ s~te identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project si~e~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological forma Describe 13. Is the project site oresentJy used by the community or ne~gt~borhood as an open space or recreation If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the communitY? EYes []lNo 1.5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None . a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes. oonds, wetland areas within or conbguous to project area: a. Name None b..Size (in acres) 17. Is the site served bv existing public utilities./ JL"lyes J~No a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection./ I~lYes i'-lNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~Yes nNo On-site .connection. 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to ^griculture and Markets Law. Article Section 303 and 304? I-lYes []No 19. Is the s~te' located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Enviromnental Area designated pursuant to Attic of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes r~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wasre~?_ I-lYes (~No B. Project Description " 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controll~:d by proiect sponsor 0 acres. e . t:. 900 + sq.ft..~ ultimately. b. Project. a~J~o be developed: 200 ~ ~.g~ inili;,lly; - c. Project acreal:e to remain undeveloped .0 . acres. d. Length of project, m miles: ~/A (11 appropriate) e. I[ the prOleCl is an expansioll, indicate perc~'nt o[ ux~ansi(m proposed ~/~ %; f. Number of o[/-~treet parkinl~ s~aces existim: . 0 , ~ronr~sed 0 g. M;ximum vehicular IriDs gemtrated per~ 1' (ugon comrfl~Hion of proiecl)f h. J~ residential: Number and type o~ ImusinH ilnits: Omt Family T~v~ Family' ~hHtil)le l'amily Imlially _ ~ Ultimately i. Dimensions (in ~eet) of largest proposed str~,cture.** _ height: width: i. Linear leer of frontage alon~ a public thornughfare project will occupy is? 3 *one per moot to check equipment Condon UltlUnl ~ length. ' See Attachment '2. How much natural . d (i.e.. reck. 0 tons/cubic y 3..Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I-lyes L-1No (~NIA '., a. If yes, for wl~at intend_,~ purpose is the site beinR reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation[' OYes E~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes ONe 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres $. will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this projec' earlh, etc.) will b. rem0v~'~ from the sde[' r-lYes ONe 6. If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction 1 7. If multi-phased: a, Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 'month c: Approximate completion date of final phase . ' month, month~, (including demolition). d, Is phase '~ functionally dependent on subsequent phases? r-lYes 8. will blasting occur during construct'ion? r'lYes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction., 3-+ ' ,,; after project is complete 0 ~ 10. Number of lobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation"of any projects or facilities[' ! 0-1Yes I~'lNo If yes, explain year, (including dem01il year. I :i nNo ' 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I-lyes D~No (ummanned facility) a. If yes, indicate .type of waste (seWage. industrial, etc.} and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste'disposal involved? OYes ~No Type (um~ammed fac£1it~) 14. Will surface area qf an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? I-Wes ' Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain[' i-lYes 16. Will the,project generate solid waste[' OYes ~No (unmanned. facility) a. If'./es, what is the amougt per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ' r'qYes l'-IHo c. If yeS. give name ; Ioca~Tbn d. Will any wastes nol go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes [~No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? r-lyes a. If yes, what is the anticipa(ed rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life[', years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?" C~'es (~No tons/month, 19. Will project routinely prdduce odors [more Ihan onl~ hour per day)? OYes ~Nu 20. Will project produce operatinl~ noise nxceedinl~ the local ambien( noise levels? ~Yus 21. Will project result in an increase in ~m,~rgy use? ~Yes ~N. If yes . indicate type(s) minimal increase in electricity 22. H water supply i~ from w~:JJs, indicate [JuJ~]j)JJ,~ cap,,city ~/A g,lllons/n~mu[e. 23. Total anticipated water usage per (J;W 0 24. Does proleCt involve Locat. St. He or F{,dera[ iundim~? If Yes, explain gallons/day. (unmanned facility) t~No 4 .25. Apprlwals R~quirelt: City, Town, Village Board [~]Yes 0~]No City, Town, Village Plannin§ Board ~Yes -City, Town Zoning Board 71' Yes City, County Health Department I~Yes I~No Other Local Agencies I-lYes I~No Other Regional Agencies [~lYes I-~lNo State Agencies ~]Yes · Federal Agencies I-lyes [~o ') Submil Type Date Site Plan Approval C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning.or zoning decision? ~Yes ENo · If Yes. indicate decision required: [~}zoning amendment I~]zonihg variance I-Isp.ecial use permit ~]subdivision [~site plan ~]new/revision of master plan ~]resource management plan ~]other - , ...... 2. ~Vhat is the zoning classification(s)of i;he site~' _, Lilzht Industry 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Site is developed 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change proposed 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning~ N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? * ~JYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~,4 mile radius of Proposed a'~tion? . Agricultural, Municipal (Collection Center) Commercial. Residential/A-C, Li~ L10, i g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? I~lYes 9. If the gr~posed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. what is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of'~Je~ver or water districts? ~Yes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, p, fire protection)? EYes ~'lNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projc, cted demand? I~lYes ENo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantI.y above present levelsi' EYes [ a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to hanrlle the additional traffic? EYes ENo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be n'ceded to clnrify your proiect. If there are or may be any ad impacts associated with your proposal, ph!ase discuss such impnc~s and lhe measures which ¥oti propose to mitiga avoid d~em C E. Verification I certify that the information provi(h,d nhow' is true lo the best of my knotvledge. N tel ommuni ation by ~reudenthal Si.nature h,/~f ~~ Tide Project Manager ' · G~ WatraI1 . I[ Ihe aclio~ i~ in I~e Coaxial Area, and yo. are a ~lale agency, c.mplele Ihe Coaslal As~essme.l Form helore proc~ ~ilh Ibis asse~smenl. ~ 5 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Jamie Richter, Town Engineer Robert G, Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer NEXTEL Communications Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-96-1-19.1 October 11, 2001 Please review the above for drainage. The "building" is an equipment Shelter, and may not need a dry well. Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town .of Southold Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12 (twelve) commtmications antennas to the existing 105' foot above grade level (ago monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated comm~mications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.l.i Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long. The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will be attached to the existing 105± foot monopole at a height orS0± feet agl, extending to 82--~ feet agl. PI.,ANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Michael Verity, Principle Building Inspector Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer/~ NEXTEL Communications Route 48, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000~96-1-19.1 October 11, 2001 Please review the attached for certification. SITE NAME: SITE #: DATE NEEDED BY: MODEL:OTHER SPECIAL DETAILS: ~p~o ~ [] B~0A2 o I) -S20 A3 /_/ DATE ORDER g.D: PROJECT MANAGER EXTERIOR FINISH: MANUFACTURER:KULLMAN o 1~ ?)0 Pl [] D~OP2 ../' o D ~Z~0P3 Nextel of New York, Inc., dfo/a Nextel Communications Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility, Site-NY2812 Peconic North 21855 County Road 48, Cutchogue Town _of Southold Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Attachment Description of Action The proposed action consists of the addition of 12 (twelve) communieat/ons antennas to the existing 105-~ foot above grade level (agl) monopole. In addition, an equipment shelter will be constructed within a fenced area adjacent to the existing equipment compound to house the associated communications equipment. The equipment will be attached to the antennas via elevated cable support. B.l.i Dimensions of largest proposed structure The Nextel pre-fabricated equipment shelter measures 10 feet wide by 20 feet long. The shelter will extend to a height of 11 feet 2 inches agl. The antennas will be attached to the existing 105± foot monopole at a height orS0± feet agl, extending to 82--~ fee/agl. SITE NAME: SITE #: DATE NEEDED BY: MODEL:OTHER SPECIAL DETAILS: o 13 ~0 A2 DATE ORDERED: PROJECT MANAGER EXTERIOR FINISH: MANU'FACTURER:KULLMAN [] B ~'90 P1 o D ~20 F2 / o D -~OP3 ~NLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN & R~ ~ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 36 North New York Avenue Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 425-4100 Telecopier (631) 425-4104 October 5, 2001 Via UPS Planning Board Office Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Nextel of New York, Inc. dgo/a Nextel Communications SCTM # 1000: Section: 96, Block: 1, Lot: 19.1 Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Sir/Madam: We are attorneys for Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications. Enclosed is our application to affix public utility wireless telecommunications antennas to an existing monopole on the premises and install a related equipment shelter. We were previously advised by Chief Building Inspector Ed Forrester that an application to the Zoning Board of Appeals was not required, only an application for approval to amend the existing Site Plan. AccorcFmgly, we enclose herewith: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Application for consideration of a Site Plan. Duly executed Transactional Disclosure Affidavit Letter of Authorization of Owner Ten (10) copies of site plan and elevation drawings Check payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $217.50 Drawings depicting the cabinets and antennas to be used. Full Environmental Assessment Form together with visual Addendum. Existing Wireless Facility Plan Kindly schedule the application for a hearing on the earliest date possible and notify the undersigned of the date assigned. Thank you. Very truly yours, MUNLEY, MEADE, NIELSEN ~ RE By: ' ,/~_~,.~ ~~' (z{ac~ueline Caputi I JC:bl Enclosures Bell Labs Innovations for Lucent Technologies Lucent Technologies '0 An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio Base Station Site NY-2812 (Peconic North): 21855 Country Road, Cutchogue, New York Prepared by the Wireless & Optical Technologies Safety Department Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974-0636 Prepared for John McAuliffe Nextel Communications One N. Broadway, 2nd Floor White Plains, New York 10601 JAN ! 5 2002 ~e,~thold Town January 7, 2002 ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 2 Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Technical Data ............................................................................................................................ 4 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy ........................................................................................ 4 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Standards .................................................... 5 5. Discussion of Safety Criteria ..................................................................................................... 5 6. For Further Information ........................................................................................................... 7 7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 8 8. References ................................................................................................................................... 9 ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 3 An Analysis of the Radiofrequency Environment in the Vicinity of a Proposed Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio Base Station Site NY-2812 (Peconic North): 21855 Country Road, Cutchogue, New York Summary This report is an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment surrounding the Nextel Communications enhanced specialized mobile radio (ESMR) base-station antennas proposed for installation in Cutchogue, NY. The analysis includes contributions from the co-located Verizon cellular radio antennas. Engineering data provided by Nextel together with well-established analytical techniques were used for calculating the RF fields associated with ESMR and cellular radio antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all transmitters will be less than 1.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the Federal Communications Commission as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 1.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP, the limits used by the State of New York Department of Health and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 4 1. Introduction This report was prepared in response to a request from Nextel Communications for an analysis of the radiofrequency (RF) environment associated with the proposed enhanced specialized mobile radio (ESMR) facility, and an opinion regarding the concern for public health associated with long-term exposure in this environment. The analysis includes the contribution from the Verizon cellular radio facility co-located at this site. The Telecommunications Act of 199611] is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of wireless facilities. With respect to personal communication services, e.g., ESMR, Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states the following: "No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Therefore, the purpose of this report is to ensure that the RF environment associated with this facility complies with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) guidelines as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which is also the same as the safety criteria used by the State of New York Department of Health (NYS DOH). 2. Technical Data The proposed ESMR and co-located cellular radio antennas are to be mounted on a monopole located at 21855 Country Road in Cutchogue, NY. The ESMR and cellular radio antennas transmit at frequencies between 869 and 894 million hertz (MHz). (These frequencies were formerly allocated for UHF television channels 77 through 79). The actual RF power propagated from ESMR and cellular radio antennas is usually less than I0 watts per transmitter (channel) and the actual total RF power is usually less than 200 watts per sector (assuming the maximum number of transmitters are installed and operate simultaneously and continuously, which is rarely, if ever, the case). These are extremely low power systems when compared with other familiar radio systems, such as AM, FM, and television broadcast, which operate upwards of 50,000 watts. The attached figure, which depicts the electromagnetic spectrum, lists familiar uses of RF energy. Table 1 lists engineering specifications for the proposed system. 3. Environmental Levels of RF Energy The antennas used for ESMR and cellular radio systems propagate most of the RF energy in a relatively narrow beam (in the vertical plane) directed toward the horizon. The small amount of energy that is directed along radials below the main beam directly under the antennas is not remarkably different from the environment in the main beam at points more distant. The methodology used to calculate the exposure levels follows that outlined in FCC OET Bulletin No. 65( For the case at hand, the maximal potential exposure levels associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of Nextel's transmitters can be readily calculated at any 1. OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, August 1997. Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 5 point in a plane at any height above grade. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the maximum power density that could exist in an accessible area is at a height of 16 ft above grade. This would be representative of the maximum power density immediately outside the upper floor of nearby private homes (assuming level terrain). The maximum power densities associated with the proposed and existing antennas are listed in Tables 2. The levels are also shown in Table 2 expressed as a percentage of the FCC's maximum permissible exposure (MPE) values found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (specifically, in the FCC Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation [2]). The above values are the theoretical maxima that could occur and are not typical values. For example, the calculations include the effect of 100% field reinforcement from in-phase reflections and the assumption that each transmitter operates continuously at maximum power. Experience has shown that the analytical technique used is extremely conservative. That is, actual (measured) power density levels have always been found to be smaller than the corresponding calculated levels even when extrapolated to maximum use conditions (all transmitters operating simultaneously) [3]. Also, levels inside nearby homes and buildings will be lower than those immediately outside because of the high attenuation of common building materials at these frequencies and, hence, will not be significantly different from typical ambient levels. 4. Comparison of Environmental Levels with RF Safety Criteria Table 2 shows the calculated maximal RF power density levels in the vicinity of the proposed installation; Table 3 shows federal, state and consensus exposure limits for human exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest. Because the MPEs vary with frequency, the calculated RF levels must first be weighted with frequency (the percentages are shown in Table 2) and then combined before comparing with the safety guidelines. With respect to FCC limits for public exposure, comparisons of the combined weighted analytical results indicate that the maximal level associated with the proposed antennas is at least 100 times below the MPE. 5. Discussion of Safety Criteria Publicity given to speculation about possible associations between health effects and exposure to magnetic fields from electric-power distribution lines, electric shavers and from the use of hand- held cellular telephones has heightened concern among some members of the public about the possibility that health effects may be associated with any exposure to electromagnetic energy. Many people feel uneasy about new or unfamiliar technology and often want absolute proof that something is safe. Such absolute guarantees are not possible since it is virtually impossible to prove that something does not exist. However, sound judgments can be made as to the safety ora physical agent based on the weight of the pertinent scientific evidence. This is exactly how safety guidelines are developed. The overwhelming weight of scientific evidence unequivocally indicates that biological effects associated with exposure to RF energy are threshold effects, i.e., unless the exposure level is sufficiently high the effect will not occur regardless of exposure duration. (Unlike ionizing radiation, e.g., X-rays and nuclear radiation, repeated exposures to low level RF radiation, or nonionizing radiation, are not cumulative.) Thus, it is relatively straightforward to derive safety limits. By adding safety factors to the threshold level for which the most sensitive effect occurs, conservative exposure guidelines have been developed to ensure safety. At present, there are more than 10,000 reports in the scientific literature which address the subject of RF bioeffects. These reports, most of which describe the results of epidemiology studies, animal and cell-culture studies, have been critically reviewed by leading researchers in the field and all new studies are continuously being reviewed by various groups and organizations whose ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 6 interest is developing health standards. These include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, the standards committees sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, the International Radiation Protection Association under the sponsorship of the World Health Organization, and the National Radiological Protection Board of the UK. All of these groups have recently either reaffirmed existing health standards, developed and adopted new health standards, or proposed health standards for exposure to RF energy. For example, in 1986, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) published recommended limits for occupational and public exposure[4]. These recommendations were based on the results of an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a committee of the leading researchers in the field of bioelectromagnetics. The literature selected included many controversial studies reporting effects at low levels. The results of all studies were weighed, analyzed and a consensus obtained establishing a conservative threshold upon which safety guidelines should be based. This threshold corresponds to the level at which the most sensitive, reproducible effects that could be related to human health were reported in the scientific literature. Safety factors were incorporated to ensure that the resulting guidelines would be at least ten to fifty times lower than the established threshold, even under worst-case exposure conditions. The NCRP recommendations for both continuous occupational and public exposure to RF energy at the frequencies of interest are shown in Table 3. (Table 3 also includes a summary of the corresponding safety criteria recommended by various organizations throughout the wodd.) In July of 1986, the Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the Federal Register, calling for public comment on recommended guidance for exposure of the public[5]. Three different limits, ranging from approximately 500 to 5000 gW/cm2 at PCS frequencies and from approximately 275 to 2,750 ~.W/cm2 at ESMR and cellular radio frequencies, were proposed. In 1987 the EPA abandoned its efforts and failed to adopt official federal exposure guidelines. However, 1993 and 1996 the EPA, in its comments on the FCC's Notice of Proposed Rule Making to adopt safety guidelines[6], recommended adoption of the 1986 NCRP limits[4]. In September 1991, the RF safety standard developed by Subcommittee 4 of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Standards Coordinating Committee SCC-28 was approved by the IEEE Standards Board[7]. (Until 1988 IEEE SCC-28 was known as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C95 Committee--established in 1959). In November 1992, the ANSI Board of Standards Review approved the IEEE standard for use as an American National Standard. The limits of this standard are essentially identical to the 1982 ANSI RFPGs[8] for occupational exposure and are one-fifth of these values for exposure of the general public (uncontrolled environments). Like those of the NCRP, these limits resulted from an extensive critical review of the scientific literature by a large committee of preeminently qualified scientists, most of whom were from academia and from research laboratories of federal public health agencies. The panels of scientists representing International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (1CNIRP), [footnote 2], [9] is recognized by the World Health Organization as an appropriate organization for developing guidelines to protect against non-ionizing radiation. ICNIRP and the National Radiological Protection Board in the United Kingdom[10] independently developed and in 1993 published guidelines similar to those of ANSUIEEE. In 1997, after another critical review of the latest scientific evidence, ICNIRP reaffirmed the limits published in 1993111]. Also, what was formerly the USSR, which traditionally had the lowest exposure guides, twice has revised upward its limits for public exposure. Thus, there is a ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 7 converging consensus of the world's scientific community as to what constitutes safe levels of exposure. Finally, in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act regarding potentially hazardous RF radiation from radio services regulated by the FCC, the Commission's Rules require that licensees filing applications after January 1, 19972 ensure that their facilities comply with the 1996 FCC MPE limits outlined in 47 CFR {}1.131013]3 (which are the same as the 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest). (Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, no local government may regulate the placement of wireless facilities based on RF emissions to the extent that these emissions comply with the FCC regulations [ 1 ].) With respect to the proposed ESMR and co-located cellular radio antennas, be assured that the actual exposure levels in the vicinity of the Cutchogue, NY installation will be below any health standard used anywhere in the world and literally thousands of times below any level reported to be associated with any verifiable functional change in humans or laboratory animals. This holds true even when all transmitters operate simultaneously and continuously at their highest power. Power density levels of this magnitude are not even a subject of speculation with regard to an association with adverse health effects. 6. For Further Information Anyone interested can obtain additional information about the environmental impact of ESMR and cellular radio communications from: Dr. Robert Cleveland, Jr. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 (202) 418-2422 and William J. Condon, CHP Chief, Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection State of New York, Department of Health 2 University Place Albany, NY 12203 (518) 458-6495 7. Conclusion This report is an analysis of the RF environment surrounding Nextel's ESMR base-station antennas proposed for installation in Cutchogue, NY. The analysis, which includes the contributions from the coqocated Verizon cellular radio facility, utilizes engineering data provided by Nextel together with well-established analytical techniques for calculating the RF 2. The FCC extended the transition period to October 15, 1997. Second Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemakthg, ET Docket 93-62~ FCC 97-303, adopted August 25, 1997. Prior to this date. the FCC required PCS licensees ;o comply with the 1992 ANSI/IEEE C95.1 limits and all other licensees (since 1987) to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits. 3. Although all FCC licensees will be required to comply with 47 CFR §1.1310 limits, the FCC will continue to exclude certain land mobile services from proving compliance with these limits 47 CFR §1.1307. In the past, although licensees had to comply with the 1982 ANSI C95.1 limits, the FCC categorically excluded land mobile services, including paging, cellular. SMR and two-way radio, from hazard analyses because "individually or cumulatively they do not have a significant effect on Ihe quality of the human environmenC[12]. The FCC pointed out that them was no evidence of excessive exposare to RF radiation during rourine normal operation of these radio services. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 8 fields associated with ESMR and cellular radio antennas. Worst-case assumptions were used to ensure safe-side estimates, i.e., the actual values will be significantly lower than the corresponding analytical values. The maximum level of RF energy associated with each transmitting antenna was compared with the appropriate frequency-dependent exposure limit, and these individual comparisons were combined to ensure that the cumulative RF environment is in compliance with safety guidelines. The results of this analysis indicate that the maximum level of RF energy to which the public may be exposed is below all applicable health and safety limits. Specifically, in all normally accessible areas surrounding the installation, the maximum level of RF energy associated with simultaneous and continuous operation of all transmitters will be less than 1.0% of the safety criteria adopted by the FCC as mandated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 is the applicable Federal law with respect to consideration of environmental effects of RF emissions in the siting of personal wireless facilities. The maximum level of RF energy will also be less than 1.0% of the exposure limits of ANSI, IEEE, NCRP, the limits used by the NYS DOH and the limits used by all states that regulate RF exposure. Enclosure: Figure. Electromagnetic Spectrum ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 9 8. References [I] Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996). [2] Federal Communication Commission 47 CFR Parts 1, 2, 15, 24 and 97. "Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation" (August 6, 1996) [3] Petersen, R.C., and Testagrossa, P.A., "Radiofrequency Fields Associated with Cellular- Radio Cell-Site Antennas," Bioelectromagnetics, Vol. 13, No. 6. (1992) [4] Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD. (1986) [5] Federal Register, Vol. 51, No. 146, Wednesday, July 30, 1986. [6] Notice of Proposed Rule Making In the Matter of Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, August 13, 1993. ET Docket No. 93-62. (1993) [7] ANSI/IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, ANSIIIEEE C95.1-1992, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ. (1992) [8] American National Standard Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz, ANSI C95.1-1982, American National Standards Institute, New York, NY. (1982) [9] Electromagnetic Fields (300 Hz to 300 GHz), Environmental Health Criteria 137, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. (1993) [10] Board Statement on Restrictions on Human Exposure to Static and Time Varying Electromagnetic Fields and Radiation, Documents of the NRPB, Vol. 4, No. 5, National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom. (1993 ) [11] "Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz) - ICNIRP Guidelines," Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp 494-522. (1998) [12] Action by the Commission February 12, 1987, by Second Report and Order (FCC 87-63), and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FCC 87-64). General Docket No. 79-144. ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 10 Table 1 Engineering Specifications for the Proposed ESMR & Co-located Cellular Radio Antennas, Cutchogue, NY ESMR Cellular Site Specifications Nextel Verizon actual total radiated power per sector 40 watts 168 watts ~ber.~Ltr~t~ (T~.).~ .n.~ ~6 ~r..~9~ ........ maximum number of ~ans~tters 8 ~r sector 21 per sector antenna centerline height above ~rade 80 fl 102.5 ft ........................... ~ m~fa~ ........................... ~d~ ................... ~m .................. m~!.~m~t~ ............................................ ~:~.~:~ ................. ~:~:?~3.~ ......... ......................... ~ ................................................................ .[~:3~.~.~J ................... ~.~A ~A~ .................... ~gt ...................................................... OJ~t~Jg~ ............... downfilt 0~ 0~ EfJ?ctive Radiated Power - ERP is a measure of how well an antenna concentrates RF energy; it is not the actual power radiated from the antenna. To illustrate the difference, compare the brightness of an ordinary 100 watt light bulb with that from a 100 watt spot-light. Even though both are I00 watts, the spot-light appears brighter because it concentrates the light in one direction. In this direction, the spot-light effectively appears to be emitting more than 100 watts. In other directions, there is almost no light emitted by the spot-light and it effectively appears to be much less than 100 watts. Table 2 Calculated Maximal Levels and the Levels as a Percentage of 1996 FCC MPEs* for the Proposed ESMR & Co-located Cellular Radio Antennas, Cutehogue, NY Power De~i~ (~W/cm2) % of MPEs* Provider- Service ........ ;~;~ ~"~i""''' ''' '~1 i'~';Li ; ~"~;~i' ......... ~"'~i~i ~e. m..~ .E ~ ~_ ~:~ ~ ....................................... ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~.d. ~ .................. 1 ............. ~:~ ~ ~ ................ Vefizon- Cellul~ < 1.52 [ < 1.90 0.28% 0.34% To~I 0.44% ] 0.56% * MPE: The FCC limits for maximum permissible exposure (same as 1986 NCRP limits at the frequencies of interest) ? AMGL: above mean grade level ESMR Site NY-2812: Cutchogue, NY - 11 Table 3 Summary of International, Federal, State and Consensus Safety Criteria for Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy at Frequencies Used for ESMR, Cellular Radio, and PCS Systems Exposure Power Densit}~ (~tW/cm2) Organization/Government A~ency Population ESMR/Cellular I PCS International Safer}' Criteria/Recommendations International Com~ssion on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (1997) ~.c...c...u.E~a~[i...o.~~ ..2.~ 4~.7.~ .......... Health Physics, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp 494-522. (1998) ~ Public 412 975 National Radiologic~ ~otection Board (NMB, 1993) Qqf~p~a[~ ..................5..~ ................. 1~.0.~.0~ ........ (United Kingdom) ~blic 2790 10,~0 Federal Requirements Federal Communications Commission (47 CFR § 1.1310) ~-~P-~'t-!9[~ ~ ~0(~ .......... Public 550 1000 Conseusus Standards and Recommendations American National Standards Institute (ANSI C95.1 - 1982) ..... ~.c...u..p~?.! ~.5...0. ~.~ Public 2750 5000 Institute of Elec~cal and Electronics Engineers .... ~..c.£.u..~.~! .................. ~.~ ~.~ ......... (ANS~EEE C95.1-1992)4 Public 550 1300 National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements .... Q~p.a~p~! ....... ~Q ......... ~Q~ (NCRP Repo~ 86, 1986) Public 550 1~0 State Codes New Jersey (NJAC 7:28-42) Public 2750 5000 Massachusetts {Department of Health 105 CMR 122) Public 550 1000 New York State~ Public 550 1000 NOTES: 1. Reaffirmed in 1997 and published, with modification in 1998 2. The NRPB guidelines have slightly different frequency ranges for their investigation levels. The values shown are the lowest values for the corresponding frequency range. 3. Incorporating IEEE Standard C95.1-1991 and IEEE Standard C95.1a-i998 4. State of New York Department of Health follows NCRP Report 86. ELECTROMAGNETIC SPECTRUM Non-Ionizing Radiation I Ionizing Radiation I Power Frequency _ I I 103 60 Hz lkHz AM Radio: 535- 1605 kHz CB Radio: 27MHz Cordless Phones: 49 MHz TV Ch 2-6:54 - 88 MHz FM Radio: 88- 108 MHz Marine Radio: 160 MHz TV Ch 7-13:174 -216MHz TV UHF Ch 14-69:470 - 800 MHz Cellular Radio, Specialized Mobile Radio, Paging: 806 - 946 MHz Antitheft devices: 10-20 kHz and/or 915 MHz Microwave oven: 915 and 2450 MHz Personal Communication Services: 1800 - 2200 MHz Intrusion alarms / door openers: 10.5 GHz Microwave radio: I - 40 GHz Satellite Communications: 100 MHz - 275 GHz 106 I I 109 I I 1012 I I 10~5 I MHz 1GHz Frequency (Hz) ~ I 10~8 Lucent Technologies - Proprietary Use pursuant to Company instructions Planning Board Town of Southold State of New York: County of Suffolk In the Matter of the Application of Nextel of New York, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Communications For Site Plan Approval Premises: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) SS.: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) AFFIDAVIT 8outhold Town '.n, In t Board Soufiane Toury, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am a radio frequency engineer employed by Nextel of New York, Inc., d/b/a Nextel Communications ('Nextel'). As a radio frequency engineer, I am trained to identify service deficiencies in telephone coverage and to evaluate the ability of proposed antenna sites to remedy service deficiencies in telephone coverage. I am fully familiar with Nextel's antenna network in Suffolk County. I submit this affidavit in support of the application of Nextel for Site Plan Approval. 3. Nextel is considered to be a public utility for zoning purposes under the laws of the State of New York and it holds a license from the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to serve the public within the Town of Southold and throughout the New York Metropolitan area. 4. The proposed public utility communication facility will consist of the affixing of twelve (12) telecommunication antennas to an existing monopole and the installation of a related - 1 - equipment enclosure on the ground adjacent to the monopole at the premises located at 21855 County Road, Cutchogue, New York. 5. Nextel strives to provide reliable service throughout its licensed coverage area. Unfortunately, at present, there is a service gap in Nextel's coverage in Southold making the service in Southold unreliable. 6. In order to understand why this antenna site that is the subject of this application is needed, it is necessary to understand how Nextel's system works from an engineering standpoint. 7. Nextel's wireless communication system is a communications system designed by strategically placing low powered base stations at determined distances apart and at predetermined heights. The frequencies used by the system are generally "line of site". Because of such factors as hills, valleys, trees, buildings, and other physical obstructions and due to the nature of radio waves, each coverage area is irregularly shaped. Therefore, the sites have some overlap to ensure "seamless" coverage. With some overlap and sufficient signal from each base station, the Nextel user can move through the cells and not lose his or her call. The sites are engineered to cover a limited area, so that an antenna facility will cover the area surrounding it but will not interfere with another site operating on the same frequency some distance away. Because neighboring sites operate on a different frequency, they provide a buffer between sites using the same frequency. This concept, known as frequency re-use, ordinarily allows the network to have sufficient capacity to provide reliable, quality service to Nextel's users. 8. In order to eliminate the service deficiency in a particular area, we prepare propagation studies to determine the height and location of the cell site needed. Based on our studies, we determined that an antenna facility at the premises with antennas affixed at 80 feet above ground level would eliminate the service deficiency. ~ 2 9. The antennas in question must be affixed at this location at the specified height of 80 feet above ground level in order to ensure that the service deficiency will be eliminated and that reliable service will be afforded to Nextel users. The need for the site is due to numerous factors; including the topography of the site and the surrounding area and the proximity of neighboring sites.. In addition, the antennas must be mounted above the tree line, in order to ensure that the signal is not obstructed. 10. Nextel proposes to collocate its antennas on a monopole located in a zoning district designated as an industrial district. Its proposed location is well integrated into the overall character of the industrially zoned area. 11. The proposed antenna facility is of vital importance to Nextel's efforts to provide reliable service to Southold. Unless it is established, a significant service deficiency will persist. 12. The antennas proposed will not interfere with radio or television service, or public safety telecommunications in the Southold area. 13. Based on all of the foregoing, this application represents an excellent choice; it will enable Nextel to provide reliable service in Southold and will have minimal visual impact on the surrounding industrial area. Sworn to before me this !~? day of ~:l-, 2002. I~A~Y PUBLIC .IAC~UELINE CAPUTI No48~035 sun.°_~ ~0 ~13r~ C~nm~ssmfl Exmres ,*u,, "=~3 SO--NE TOIffi~Y Radio Frequency Engineer - 3 AFFIDAVIT NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC, CELLULAR TELEPHONE SITE 21855 Middle Road (County Rd. 48) Cutchogue, New York 11935 Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-96-1-19.1 DATE OF I4~,AR]NG January 14, 2002 Sou;hold Town PREPARED FOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PREPARED BY LYNCH APPRAISAL LTD. 294 New York Avenue, Suite 2A Huntington, New York 11743 (631) 427-1000 AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL J. LYNCH STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) SS.: MICHAEL J. LYNCH, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am President of Lynch Appraisal Ltd. with offices at 294 New York Avenue, Huntington, New York. I am a certified New York State general real estate appraiser. I have been qualified to testify as an expert witness before the Town of Huntington Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Town of Oyster Bay Board of Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Town of North Hempstead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals and Town Board, Brookhaven Board of Zoning Appeals, Town of Smithtown Board of Zoning Appeals and Town Board, Town of Shelter Island Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Islip Planning Board, Town of Southold Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Southampton Planning Board, as well as numerous incorporated villages throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties. 2. At the request of NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. ('Nextel') I have inspected the proposed site that is the subject of this application. I am fully familiar with the site, the neighborhood in which it lies, and I am fully familiar with what is proposed by Nextel. 3. The proposed Nextel wireless site in the hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, calls for the installation of twelve (12) panel antennas (making up a total of three sectors), affixed to an existing 105' monopole. The antennas will be at a height of 80' (centerline). There will also be associated equipment cabinetry on a concrete pad near the base of the tower. Nextel's site will join an existing wireless site by Verizon Wireless, whose antennas are situated at the top of the tower. The Nextel site will be at the north-westerly corner of an auto repair site situated along the northerly side of Middle Road (County Road 48), 750' westerly of Cox's Lane. It contains a total site area of 1.05 acres and is situated within a "LI" Light Industrial zoning district. Adjoining properties include a Town of Southold recycling center to the north, vacant land to the east, and a single-family dwelling to the west, all zoned Light Industrial (LI). Across Middle Road to the south is vacant land. zoned Agricultural Conservation (A-C). Nearby properties include a multi-tenanted industrial center, and vacant industrial and agricultural land. Accordingly, it is my professional opinion that the proposed site will not negatively affect property values in the surrounding area, and will not have an adverse effect on the character of the neighborhood or the pattern of its development. The property values, neighborhood character and pattern of development have already been well established by the existing conditions, uses and zoning within the area. This includes the existing monopole and telecommunications equipment already in place on the subject property. 4. In addition, my opinion is supported by studies we have conducted regarding other wireless facilities. We have studied the effects of the installation of wireless telecommunication sites at Arlington Avenue, Franklin Square, New York, and May Place, Massapequa Park, New York. We have studied the effects of an existing 300' lattice tower on new luxury housing homes at Southwoods Road, Woodbury, New York. And we have the studied the effects of a rooftop wireless site at Glen Cove Road, East Hills, New York. In addition, we have consulted with a New Jersey real estate appraiser who studied the effects on property values of numerous wireless telephone sites in the state of New Jersey, and with an appraiser who studied value patterns surrounding free- standing monopoles with antennas affixed at two Long Island sites. These studies are summarized on the following pages: A. Water Tower Site, Arlington Avenue Franklin Square, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on January 1998. This tower is situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings. Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on- line date of the antennas. Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 11/95 to 10/97, was compared with "after" data, which included six (6) sales running from 3/98 to 7/OO. The average price per square foot of the homes in the before and after groups was 21% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values. B. Water Tower Site, May Place, Massapequa Park, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas went on-line affixed to this water tower site on October 1, 1992. This tower is also situated in a stable residential neighborhood comprised of a relatively modest and homogenous group of single-family dwellings. Our staff compared sales data (price per square foot) of homes in the immediate area (up to 1/3± mile away) before and after the on-line date of the antennae. Our "before" data, which included thirteen (13) sales running from 3/90 to 10/92, was compared with "after" data, which included fifteen (15) sales running from 12/92 to 10/94. The sales data for these two groups was inconclusive in that the price per square foot in the "after" situation was actually higher than the "before" situation. The market for homes during this time period was relatively stable. C. 300' Lattice Tower, Southwoods Road, Woodbury, Nassau County, New York. An existing 300' telecommunications tower sits along the west side of Southwoods Road, opposite Shannon Drive. Across the street from this tower is a series of housing developments of luxury homes that were built from 1994 to 1999. Many of the homes in these developments are within clear sight of the tower. In addition to researching overall sales in the Woodbury-Syosset area, we included looking at other home sales within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower, but otherwise similar to the affected homes. Our research indicates that the selling prices of the affected homes far exceeds the average selling prices of homes in the Wooclbury-Syosset area, based on Multiple Listing sales data. Furthermore, the selling prices for the affected homes was similar to that of homes within the same developments that were not within direct sight of the tower. The following data reflects sales of homes along those streets within view of the tower, and average sales prices in the Woodbury-Syosset area: PRICE R3%NGE OF HOMES (FROM 1994-1997) ALONG SHANNON DRIVE, PIRONI COURT, AND CHAUI~CEY PLACE: $500,000 - $747,000; AVERAGE AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON MLS DATA: $~91,565 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN WOODBURY BASED ON P~LS DATA: $~3~,6~7 AVERAGE 1997 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $402,878 AVERAGE 1996 SALE PRICE IN SYOSSET BASED ON MLS DATA: $357,172 Our research has concluded that the presence of this tower has not had a negative effect on real estate values for those homes that are within sight of the tower. D. Rooftop Antennas, 70 Glen Cove Road, East Hills, Nassau County, New York. Wireless antennas were affixed to the rooftop of this 3-story office building in late 1997. This building is bordered to east, north/east and south/east by a relatively homogenous group of mid-priced single fa/nily dwellings, sharing similar appeal and utility. These include Colonial, Cape and Split-level styles, and are situated within the Red Ground Civic Association. Our staff compared sales data of homes in the immediate area (up to 3 blocks away) before and after the on-line date of the antennas. Our "before" data, which included eight (8) sales running from 10/94 to 4/97, was compared with "after" data, which included twelve (12) sales running from 1/98 to 8/00. The average price per home in the before and after groups was 20% higher for the latter, but statistically similar after adjusting for market appreciation. This leads the appraiser to conclude that the antennas did not lead to a devaluation of nearby property values. E. Twin Guyed Microwave Towers, Randolph, New Jersey. A regression analysis was completed during 1995 by Mr. Thomas P. Welsh ('Welsh'), a New Jersey real estate appraiser who is a partner in the firm, KRAUSER, WELSH & CIRZ, Inc., 161 Madison Ave., Morristown, NJ. He studied luxury homes sales in the immediate and general vicinity of twin guyed microwave towers (erected circa 1960s, later fitted with wireless antennas) in Randolph, NJ. Using sales price per square foot as his dependent variable, Welsh utilized a sample size of 204 homes sales within the past 15 years that were within various distances (to a maximum of approx. 1/4 mile radius) to the towers. His regression analysis showed no significant evidence that distance of the homes relative to the towers showed any effect on the sales price per square foot of said homes. In other words, the presence of microwave/wireless towers in this particular neighborhood, using sales data collected from the past 15 years, had no significant effect on property values. Furthermore, Mr. Welsh indicated to our firm that he has researched this topic and related matters extensively, and that he does not know of one study which has proved that the presence of microwave/wireless towers or antennas in a particular neighborhood results in a diminution of surrounding property values. F. Monopole Antenna Sites, Port Washington and Shoreham, Long Island, NY. John Breslin, a licensed New York State general real estate appraiser with offices in Huntington, New York, has conducted similar studies that concur with our findings. Mr. Breslin studied properties abutting free-standing monopoles in the hamlets of Port Washington and Shoreham. His firm researched sales both before and after the erection of the structures. At each site there was no significant change in property values due to the erection of the monopoles. The time period for these studies, he noted, was between 1992-1995, a period when property values in those hamlets was relatively stable. Both of the sites and data analyzed by Mr. Breslin was personally inspected and reviewed by our company, and found to be valid. 5. In summary, we found no correlation between the presence of wireless telecommunication antennas and declining property values in the four Long Island residential communities we studied. Our findings corroborate those of both Mr. Thomas Welsh, the New Jersey appraiser who undertook a similar study with respect to wireless sites in New Jersey, and with John Breslin, the Huntington, New York appraiser who studied value patterns of properties surrounding monopoles on Long Island. MICHAEL ~ ~CH Sworn to before me this day o~nua~--y 2002. YPUBLi~ ADDENDA VIEW OF PROPERTY WITH E~STING MONOPOLE IN BACKROU~ CLOSE-UP OF EXISTING MONOPOLE AND TELECOMMUN!CA~ONS EQUIPMENT PLANNING, ZONING AND VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED NEXTEL PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 21855 COUNTY ROAD 48 HAMLET OF CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Nextel Communications One South Street Garden City, New York 11530 2042 Prepared by: Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc; 368 Veterans Memorial Highway Commack, New York 11725 (631) 499-2222 January2002 Table of Contents Page Introduction .............................................. 1 Proposed Public Utility Communications Facility and Site Conditions .. 3 Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis .................... 6 Visual Impact Analysis ...................................... 12 Findings and Conclusions .................................... 14 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Site Location Map ............................... 2 Site Plan, Elevations, Plans and General Notes ......... 4 Zoning Map .................................... 7 Nextel Search Area .............................. 9 Photograph Location Map ......................... 11 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Photographs of Subject Site and Surrounding Area CAM Consulting Group, Inc. Letter of Methodology, View Point Photographs and Photographic Simulations Curriculum Vitae of Theresa Elkowitz, Principal of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. INTRODUCTION A planning, zoinng and visual impact analysis was performed for the proposed Nextel of New York, d/b/a Nextel Communications (Nextel) public utility communications facility consisting of twelve panel antennas to be mounted to an existing 105 foot 84- inch monopole with the associated equipment shelter to be located in an existing fenced communications compound containing the associated equipment of another carrier. The subject site is located at 21855 County Road 48, Hamlet of Cutehogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, (see F~gure 1 - Site Location Map). The site was examined as to visual resources, environmental conditions and surrounding land use and zoning. A site and area inspection as well as review of aerial photography were undertaken to examine land use on the site and in the surrounding community. In addition, the Town of Southold zoning map was consulted to determine the zoning of the site and surrounding area. The aesthetic conditions were evaluated through visual inspection of the proposed public utility commtmications facihty location, evaluation of physical characteristics of the proposed facility and visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon. In order to conduct the visual analysis, the following methodology was employed: Visual inspection of the existing public utility communications facility location and evaluation of physical characteristics of the proposed co-location; Visual inspection of proximate areas to determine existing characteristics of and obstructions in the horizon; and Photographic simulation analysis of the proposed public utility communications facility from several identified vantage points, conducted by CAM Consulting Services, Inc. Figure 1 - Site Location Map local Road ~ Primary State Route Railroad Population Cen~er Land Source: [996 DeLorme Street Atlas USA FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 2 Figure 1 PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND SITE CONDITIONS The proposed Nextel Communications installation is to co-locate within an existing public utility communications facility situated at 21855 County Road 48, Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold, Suffolk County. The property is designated on the Suffolk County tax maps as Section 096 - Block 1 - Lot 19.1 and is improved with an existing building, asphalt pavement, parking lot and 105 foot $± inch monopole with antennas of one other communications carrier (the center-line of which extends to 102.5± feet above grade level (agl). There is an existing equipment shelter which extends to a height of 11 feet 2~ inches agl. The proposed project consists of the attachment of three sectors of Nextel Communications antennas (four antennas each) to the existing monopole (see Figure 2- Site Plan, Elevations, Plans and General Notes) the center-line of which will be at 80~- feet agl, lower than the existing antennas. The associated prefabricated equipment shelter will be 10± feet by 20± feet by 11 feet 2=~ inches high and will be located within the communications compound. The existing fence around the compound will be moved to allow for the installation of the Nextel Communications equipment shelter. .,,~, / ,: ? ', /. . ','q. t /~ ', t ,~ 'q..'.~'.-.-..~....... ,,~ ",,,,,, C~ PAFIT SFI"E PLAN (~) ENLARGED PLAN COX LAN~ (BEYOND) (~ WEST ELEVATION 4 GENERAL NOTES GENERAL SITE NOTES WILLIAM E COLLI~I& AIA A R C H I T E C T S, LLP COMMLI~CATIONS PECOI~C NOR'1H NY-2812 Figure 2 Visual Environment of the Site and Surrounding Area The subject site contains a one-story commercial building, paved parking areas, an existing communications compound and a 105 foot 8± inch monopole with associated equipment. The area surrounding the subject site contains predominantly agricultural and residential with a mixture of indusla'ial and commercial (retail businesses and commercial offices) uses. la order to better depict the nature of the surrounding community, photographs are included in Appendix A. A detailed description of the land use surrounding the site is contained in the section entitled Zoning, Land Use and Environmental Analysis, below. The visual environment of the surrounding area contains obstructions. There are existing utility poles and overhead wires on most surrounding roads, and a public utility communications facility on the subject site. 5 ZONING~ LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The site is located in an area zoned Light Industrial (LI) (see Figure 3 - Zoning Map). AccorcFmg to the Town of Southold Zoning Code, this dislrict permits any use in either the Agricultural Conservation (A-C) Zoning or the Light Industrial/Office Park (LIO) and wineries. Such uses include, but are not limited to, wholesale businesses, warehouses and building material storage and sale, cold storage plants, baking and other food processing and packaging plants. The zoning and land uses of the surrounding area are as follows: No~h: The zoning directly north of the site is Light Industrial and contains a town landfill and an asphalt company, as well as large undeveloped areas. East: East of the site is a retail area at the intersection of Cox Avenue and County Road 48 which is zoned Agricultural Conservation (A-C). South: Directly south of the project site, the area is zoned Agricultural Conservation and contains mostly farmland. West: West of the site is zoned Light Industrial/Office Park (LIO) and contains both farms and undeveloped areas. 6 Zomng Map of the Town of Southold N LA` Town of Southold Zoning Map, 1/10/89 Scale: 1"=1600' Figure 3 FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWlTZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. · 7 The site is located within an area in which Nextel Communications is experiencing a service deficiency gap (see Figure 4 - Nextel Search Area). The search area is that in which the public utihty communications facility must be located to address the service deficiency gap being experienced by Nextel. The boundaries of the search area are generally the Long Island Raikoad tracks to the south; Mathews Lane to the north; Zacks Lane to the west and east of Bridge Lane, to the east. This search area contains a mix of predominantly agricultural and residential with some retail and industrial uses. From a planning perspective and given the area in which Nextel must place its public utility communications facility, the site is optimal as Nextel has selected to co-locate on an existing monopole in an area with industrial and commercial uses. Thus, the proposed installation will not necessitate the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole, to accommodate the antennas. Furthermore, the height ofmonopole need not be extended to accommodate the Nextel antennas. Environmental Considerations Since the facihty will be unmanned, there will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions in the area. The facility will not generate either sewage or solid waste and will not need to be supplied with potable water. The equipment installed on the site will use a minimal amount of electricity. There will be no impact on soils or topography as the site is already developed with a public utility communications facility. Since there will be no sewage generation or water use, there will be no impact to surface water or groundwater quantity or quality. The proposed area for the installation of the facility is developed, therefore, there will be no impact to the ecology of the area. Figure 4 - Nextel Search Area 8 I Search Area Map N Source: Nextel Communications; Town of Southold Zoning Map. (see Figure 3 for zoning legend) Search Area:N Scale: 1"=1,600' FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 9 Figure 4 VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Photographic Simulation Methodology CAM Consulting Group, Inc. prepared photorealistic renderings of the proposed public utility communications facility. On October 16, 2001, CAM Consulting Group, Inc. conducted an on-site visit to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding area. Analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points examined between12:00 noon and 4:00 p.m. The conditions were mostly sunny. Eight off-site "View Points" proximate to the site were selected for analysis as areas of potential visual impact, four (4) of which were selected for photographic simulation of the completed antenna installation. A Photograph Location Map of the surrounding area is included in Figure 5. As noted, analog photographs were taken from each of the View Points being examined. The photographs were developed and scarmed into a computer. The images were imported into the Adobe sof~ware program. Files of existing structures were layered onto the photographic image and scaled accordingly. The complete methodology for the photographic simulations is included in Appendix B. 10 0 11 Figure 5 VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The results of the visual simulation analysis are summarized below with simulations included in Appendix B. View Point 1, From northwest corner of Cox Lane and County Road 48, 498± feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph shows the existing monopole visible above the tree line, as well as utility poles and overhead wires, from the Cox Lane Industrial Park. The photographic simulation indicates the proposed Nextel installation would be visible from this vantage point. However, the proposed facility has been designed such that it is similar to the existing antennas and lower on the monopole. View Point 2, From northwest corner of Church Lane and County Road 48, 1,091± feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph depicts overhead wires, utility poles, a flagpole and the existing monopole in the horizon, The photographic simulation shows the proposed Nextel antennas, although visible from this location, would have a minimal, incremental visual impact as they are lower than the existing antennas. View Point 3, From Bidwell Vineyards on County Road 48, 2,951± feet from subject site: View Point 3 was taken from Bidwell Vineyards. The existing conditions photograph indicates overhead wires and utility poles which help to obscure the view of the existing monopole. The addition of the Nextel antennas would have a negligible impact from this vantage point. View Point 4, From 975 Horseshoe Drive, 3,1044- feet from subject site: The existing conditions photographic shows the monopole visible in the distance, among overhead wires. As shown in the photographic simulation, the addition of the Nextel antennas would not alter the visual character of the surrounding area. 12 View Point 5, From the intersection of Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street, 2,632± feet from subject site: Taken from the intersection o£Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street, the existing conditions photograph illustrates high tension lines and vegetation in a residential area. The existing monopole is not visible from this view point. Thus, a photographic simulation was not prepared as the proposed installation would not be visible. View Point 6, From 10725 Oregon Road, 2,696~ feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph depicts a farm with associated equipment and mature vegetation in the distance. A photographic simulation was not prepared as the existing monopole is not visible. A~ such, the proposed Nextel antennas will not be visible and will have no impact on this area. View Point 7, From northeast corner of Matthews Lane and Cox Lane, 714' feet from subject site: The existing conditions photograph shows the mature vegetation that lines Cox Lane. A photographic simulation was not prepared as the existing monopole is not visible from this view point, and as such, the Nextel antennas would not be visible. View Point 8, From the intersection of Tuthill Lane and County Road 48, 1,329:~ feet from subject site: From the intersection of Tuthill Lane and County Road 48, overhead wires, utility poles, existing mature vegetation and a single-family home are visible in the existing conditions photograph. As the proposed Nextel antennas would not be visible from this location, because the existing monopole is not visible, a photographic simulation was not prepared. As the visual analysis indicates, the proposed antennas would be visible from various vantage points. However, given existing obstructions in the horizon including the existing monopole, numerous utility poles, overhead wires and transmission lines, the placement of the Nextel antennas on the existing monopole would have a negligible visual impact. Thus, the proposed public utility communications facility will not alter neighborhood character or the aesthetics of the community. · 13 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Based upon an inspection of the proposed public utility communications facility site and surrounding areas, analysis of the surrounding zoning, land use and environmental conditions, evahiation of characteristics of the proposed pubhc utility commumcations facility installation and analysis of the photographic simulations, the following findings can be made: The visual environment in the vicinity of the subject site contains obstructions. The existing visual obsl~uctions include the existing monopole, utility poles and overhead wires. There will be minimal impact on the environmental conditions of the site and the surrounding area since the antennas will be mounted to an existing structure, the associated equipment will be situated within a previously-disturbed area and the facility will be remotely monitored. The Telecommunications Act of 1996, the federal law that governs wireless communications facilities, encourages co-location. The co-location (in this case placement of communications antennas on an existing monopole), helps to minimize potential cumulative impacts. From a planning perspective and given the area in which Nextel must place its facility, the site is optimal as Nextel has selected to co-locate on an existing monopole in an area with industrial and commercial uses. Thus, the proposed installation will not necessitate the construction of a new structure, such as a monopole, to accommodate the antennas. The photographic simulations indicate that, although visible fi.om certain vantage points, the proposed installation will have a minimal incremental aesthetic impact on the surrounding community as the antennas will be situated lower than the existing antennas on an existing monopole. · 14 Given the extent and nature of the service deficiency area and the need for a public utility communications facility therein, Nextel has selected a location on a structure, w/th existing antennas, in an area with light industrial and commercial uses. As there are existing visual obstructions in the horizon, the installation will blend with obstructions in the horizon and will be in character with the existing aesthetic character. In conclusion, given the area in which the proposed facility must be located, Nextel has designed the proposed public utility communications facility in a manner that will serve to minimize potential adverse impacts to the maximum extent practicable. Thus, the granting of the application will not result in substantial changes to the physical characteristics of the area nor would it result in significant adverse impacts to neighborhood character, aesthetic quality or the environmental conditions of the community. · 15 APPENDIX A FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Photograph No. 1: View of existing monopole from the entrance to the landfill. Photoeraph NO. 2: View of the fenced compound area at the base of the existing monopole. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. PhotoeraDh No. 3: View of the Cox Lane Industrial Park, facing northwest: at Cox Lane and County Road 48. Note utility pole and overhead wires traversing the area. Photograph N0: 4_: View of SUrrounding area, facing east on County Road 48, West of the existing monopole. Utility poles and overhead wires are visible along County Road 48. FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. APPENDIX B FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP i I"NC. Photo Simulation Report Wireless Communication Facility Located at: 21855 County Road Cmchogue, NY Prepared for Nextel Communications Prepared by CAM Consulting Group, Inc. CAM Consulting, Inc. 18 Mansfield Drive Massapequa Park, NY 11762 Office (516) 797-9148 Mobile (516) 448-2893 October 18, 2001 Town of Southold Chairman and Board Members Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Nextel Wireless Communication Facility 21855 County Road, Cutchogue, NY Dear Chairman and Board Members: To determine the visual impact of the proposed Nextel facility, CAM Consulting prepared photo- realistic renderings of the proposed public utility communications facility. An onsite visit was conducted to obtain familiarity with the site and surrounding areas. The following is a description of the methods used to prepare the visual analysis study and photo renderings of Nextel's proposed wireless communication facility at 21855 County Road 48, Cutehogue, New York. Subject Property Description: 21855 County Road 48 Cutchogue, New York 11971 District: 1000 Section: 096 Block: 01 Lot: 19.1 Zoning Classification: L.I. Light Industry Characteristics of Surrounding Area: The subject property is surrounded primarily by commercial, agricultural and industrial zoned properties mixed with residentially zoned properties. Surrounding commercial properties located in the Cox Lane Industrial Park which lies to the east include: Wicks Unlimited, Mattituck Glass & Mirror, Frank's Stairs & Railings, Peconic Telco, Bertsand Plumbing and Heating, Peconic Communications, Hoeys Custom Canvas, Morton Building, Peconic Bay Auto Body and North Fork Imports. Bidwell Vineyards lies to the west. Santorini Restaurant and Catering facility lies approximately 1.5 miles north and is not impacted by the proposed installation. On Site Analysis: CAM Consulting representatives took photographs and conducted an on-site visual inspection of the existing monopole and surrounding area. The photographs were taken on Tuesday, October 16, 2001 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Weather conditions were mostly sunny. Nextel proposes to install its antennas on Crown Communication's existing monopole as described in the accompanying drawings presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Eight points of visual impact are described below. In four of the viewpoints, the monopole and antenna panels are visible. The other four viewpoints represent non-impact views where Nextel's proposed installation will not be visible by the human eye. Nextel's proposed 12'x 20' equipment shelter located in the rear yard of the subject property will be completely obstructed from view by the property's main building. Therefore, the equipment shelter will present no visual impact. Following is a description of eight visual an~Fsis viewpoints: Approxitnate View Point ii View Point £ocation distance.from site View Point 1 View from northwest comer of Cox Lane and County _+ 498 feet Road 48. View Point 2 View from northwest comer of Church Lane and + 1091 feet County Road 48, View Point 3 View from Bidwell Vineyards on County Road 48. ± 2951 feet View Point 4 View from 975 Horseshoe Road. + 3104 feet View Point 5 View from Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street. + 2632 feet Non Impact View Point 6 View from 10725 Oregon Road. Non Impact + 2696 feet View Point 7 View from Northeast comer of Matthews Lane and _+ 714 feet Cox Lane. Non Impact View Point 8 View from Tuthill Lane and County Road 48. Non + 1329 feet Impact Photo-simulation Methodololo~: Site photographs were taken by a two-man team with a Nikon F5 camera with a fixed 50mm lens, which most closely resembles the view of the human eye. The images were then imported into the Adobe 6.0 software program and images of actual antennas from existing sites were layered on to the existing monopole and scaled to size. The layered images were then filtered using various filters to create the final image, which closely resembles what will actually be seen by the human eye. The image was then printed on Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper providing photo quality simulations of the proposed site. Sincerely, Christine Marino CAM Consulting Group, Inc. View Point 1 Existing view - from northwest corner of Cox Lane and County Road 48. ~eW Point t View from northwest corner of Cox Lane and County Road 48. ~ew Point 2 Existing View - from no~hwest corner of Church Lane and County Road 48. view Point 2 View from northwest corner of Church Lane and County Road 48. View Point 3 Existing view - from Bidwell Vineyards on CounW Road 48. View Point 3 View from Bidwell Vineyards on County Road 48. View Point 4 Existing view - from 975 Horseshoe Road. VieW Point 4 View from 975 HorseShoe Road. View Point 5 View from Horseshoe Road and Gold Spur Street. Non Impact View Point 6 View from 10725 Oregon Road. Non Impact View Point 7 View from northeast corner of Matthews Lane and Cox Lane. Non Impact View Point 8 View from Tuthill Lane and County Road 48. Non impact APPENDIX C FREUDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FREIJDENTHAL & ELKOWITZ ¢ONSIJLTING GROIJP INC0 Theresa Elkowi¢~, Pr~si~e~t Hug° D. Freate,~thal (R~6M-199-q) CURRICULUM VITAE OF THERESA ELKOWITZ 368 Veteran~ Memorial Hi,hwa? Co=rnack, Ne,~ York 117,% Tel: (631) ~199-2222 F~x~ (651) 't99-5928 OVERVIEW Theresa Elkowitz is the president of Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc. (F&E), an environmental and planning consulting firm. She is well-versed in the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR) process and has prepared numerous Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs); Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS and FEIS); planning and zoning studies, visual assessments; environmental assessments and associated evaluations. Not only has she worked with public and private clients on the administration of the SEQR, but she also serves as Chairperson of the Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The CEQ is responsible for recommending SEQR determinations, holding public hearings and admimstration of the environmental review process for actions proposed by the County of Suffolk. Ms. Elkowitz provides expert testimony and affidavits to various Town and Village Boards, Planning Boards and Zoning Boards of Appeals on planning, zoning and environmental matters and has provided testimony and affidavits in court cases. Ms. Elkowitz has also served as Municipal Planner and/or provided consulting planning and/or environmental sen'vices to the Incorporated Villages of Lake Success, Manorhaven, Great Neck Estates, Old Brookville, Brookville and Sands Point and the Town of Babylon and City of Glen Cove. In addition, to ensure compliance with SEQR, Ms. Elkowitz provides environmental consulting services to various school districts including, but not limited to: Cold Spring Harbor, East Quogue, Half Hollow Hills, Jericho, Lindenhurst, Three Village, Plainview-Old Bethpage, Rocky Point, East Williston, Eastport-South Manor, Westhampton Beach, Harborfields, Patchogue-Medford, Port Washington, East Moriches, Smithtown, Bay Shore, Kings Park, Commack, Oyster Bay-East Norwich, Bellmore-Merrick, Seaford and Wantagh and to various public libraries including, but not limited to: Manhasset, East Islip and Hauppauge. Prior to forming F&E, Ms. Elkowitz spent several years managing environmental projects for a consulting engineering firm. She has been involved in many diverse projects including the preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs), Local Waterfront Revitalization Programs, wetland evaluations, water use and conservation plans, municipal and private planning studies, grant applications, as well as solid waste management plans and Part 360 permit applications. 2 Before entering the field of environmental and planning consulting, Ms. Elkowitz was employed by the Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs. She was responsible for preparing environmental assessments for community development projects in accordance with the SEQR Act and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Representative projects/documents which Ms. Elkowitz has supervised, prepared and/or had a significant preparatory role include, but are not limited to: DEIS and related SEQP, YCEQR Documentation for Kensico Water Pollution Control Program for New York City Department of Environmental Protection; DEIS and related SEQR/CEQR Documentation for Fresh Kills Landfill for New York City Department of Sanitation; EAFs, DEISs, Determinations of Significance and Notices for various School Districts; DEIS for Rezoning of 147+ acre Nassau County Property for Nassau County; DEIS and FEIS for Rezoning of 170+ acre Roosevelt Raceway for property owner; Various Planning, Zoning, Environmental and Visual Assessments for Public Utility Communications Facilities and other Wireless Carriers; DEIS and FEIS for development of 22+ acre commercial center in Stony Brook for private applicant; LWRP and environmental and planning tasks for Incorporated Village of Manorhaven; DEIS and FEIS for 200+ unit Planned Retirement Community in Amityville for private applicant; DGEIS for creation of Incentive Zoning District for the Town of Goshen; DEIS and FEIS fbr 23+ acre subdivision in the Village of Kings Point for private applicant, USACOE and NYSDEC wetland applications and presentations at public hearings; 3 DEIS and FEIS for a commercial building in Woodmere, securing of NYSDEC and USACOE wetland permits, presentations at public hearings; Preparation of an EAF and environmental report for a proposed solid waste management recycling facility in Brookhaven; EAF and Environmental Report for proposed 40 unit residential development for the deaf in Corm; DEIS and FEIS for residential and commercial development in Riverhead, securing a NYSDEC Freshwater Wetland Permit; DEIS and FEIS for waterfront condominium complex in Freeport, expert testimony on wetlands and representation of client before Freeport Planning Board, preparation of NYSDEC and USACOE Wetland Applications; DEIS and FEIS for corporate park in Holbrook, data collection and preparation of economic analysis report for proposed corporate park; DEIS and FEIS for 80 unit residential condominium complex in Coram, preparation of wetland application; FEIS for an affordable housing development in Riverhead, preparation of an Affordable Housing Corporation Grant Application; DEIS and detailed water use and conservation study for Marriott Hotel expansion, Uniondale, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; DEIS and FEIS for residential subdivision in Beckman/East Fishkill, expert testimony associated with SEQR process; DEIS and FEIS tbr an office condominium complex in Wantagh, expert testimony associated with SEQR process, preparation of NYSDEC freshwater wetland permit application; DEIS and FEIS for a shopping center in Patchogue, expert testimony associated with SEQR process. 4 EXPERIENCE Principal and Corporate President. Responsible for operations of a multi-disciplined environmental and planning consulting fn'm. Technical tasks include the preparation of environmental impact statements; environmental assessment forms; site assessments; waterfront revitalization programs; wetland evaluations; planning studies; and various permit applications and related analyses for public and private clients. Environmental presentations and expert testimony before various municipal boards and community groups. Administrative tasks include all business operations, personnel manageinent, budgeting, billing, marketing etc. Freudenthal & Elkowitz Consulting Group, Inc., 368 Veterans Memorial Highway, Commack, New York. August, 1988 - Present. Environmental Proiect Manager/Planner. Responsible for the preparation of environmental impact statements, environment assessments and planning studies for private clients and municipalities. Environmental presentations and testimony to Town Boards and Planning Boards. Preparation of various New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nassau County Department of Health and Suffolk County Department of Health Services permit applications. Coordination of State Environmental Quality Review procedures. Site evaluations and environmental assessments for real estate developers. Administrative functions including proposal and contract preparation, budget analysis, and bill/rig. Supervision of professional and support staff. Baldwin & Cornelius, P.C., 210 Express Street, Plainview, New York. December, 1986 -August, 1988. Neighborhood Aide/Assistant to the Housing, Rehabilitation Administrator. Completion of environmental reviews for all Community Development projects in accordance with SEQR and N-EPA. Preparation of grant proposals. Assisted in the first affordable housing program for the Town ofBrookhaven - the Neighborhood Homes Program. Credit feasibility analyses for SONYMA mortgage applicants. Interviewing for residential rehabilitation, materials grant and townwide handicap ramp programs, evaluation of applications and subsequent loan recommendations. Monitoring and coordinating of the Materials Grant and Townwide Handicap Ramp programs, monitoring of loan repayments and analysis of project income. Solicitation of consultants and engineers for public works projects. Coordination of public works projects and contract compliance with federal regulations. Preparation of budgets and recommendations for policy changes. Town of Brookhaven Department of Housing, Community Development and Intergovernmental Affairs, 3233 Route 112, Medford, New York. November, 1983 -November, 1986. .Instructor. Preparation of and teaching biweekly recitations in algebra and introductory microeconomics, private tutorials, assigning and grading homework and examinations. Association for Public Policy and Management Summer Institute for Minority Students, W. Averell Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York. Summer, 1983, 1984 and 1985. 5 EDUCATION M.S., Policy Analysis and Public Management; W. Aver¢ll Harriman College for Policy Analysis and Public Management. May, 1985. B.A., Liberal Arts; State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. SPECIAL PROJECTS Consultant. Responsible for the formulation, implementation and administration of the Residential Rehabilitation Program for the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove. Tasks include interviewing clients, evaluating applications, program coordination, project monitoring and payments. Fall, 1985 -1987. Graduate Workshop. Statistical analysis of usage of the Mastic-Moriches-Shirley Community Library. Recommendations to the Library's Board of Trustees regarding how to increase community patronage and involvement. Spring, 1984. MEMBERSHIPS Chairperson, Suffolk County Council on Environmental Quality Environment Committee of the Long Island Association Board of Directors, Long Island Builders Institute HONORS, AWARBS AND DESIGNATIONS Certified Environmental Specialist and Certified Environmental Inspector, Environmental Assessment Association, 1994. Magna Cum Laurie Graduate, State University of New York at Stony Brook. May, 1985. Winner, Presidential Management Intern Program. Spring, 1985. OLASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Project Type: Amended Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM #: 1000- 96-1-19.1 Proiect Name: Nextel Communications (8/02) Address: 21855 County Road Hamlet: Cutcho,que Applicant Name: Jacqueline Caputi, Esq. Owner Name: ArthurV. Jun.q Zone 1: LI Approval Date: 8/12/2002 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 8/12/2002 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: Located on the north side of CR 48, 750' west of Cox's Lane, Cutcho.que. SC Filin.q Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M A.qreement: SCAN Date: !YE 8.67 Miles 11957 NY1316/MontaukPt-AT&T NY 12 t 4/EASTI{AIvlFrON