Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-56.-6-6.1 (2) -1-1-1 - ' I - - -- 1 - w� - - ' - ' `• i ia" "' ,. k �4' a ry' 1 - ,- - . - 'moi' 3 _ t , __' -', C.,..' fw ,c, `./'w' a . " Id'{'Ir F I! '! `.l yr,.a' t� r. r' r, ' _ "...� T _ - .... ON „ ' r , -, ' - 1 �I`,T',4"I ", . , I .r r ,1 II, }D ., .� - „ ,, 1 _ f � i .'_a„ 1Jr' 4- ',,:r r- +ef ' _ ',4' '"`" .ur. .i x ,1, ,a r Y.w, k y - { " .'!r I [ 1 - f�`- A- { y .c M"' " a i @' ' 4 r" I , . yy, , 1� a {„_9. "”„ ,+ - - .}�. '1 . - 1 " Y33 '� -o. }..u . s , O nom. t y . wig M ,: ., ' 'a 'i ✓ I O 1. ':. \ d'%. rqrq , Il , II Ill p l. 11 _ '­ 11_ � - /� 's - - - k,,. '+"',LIE ft .+, t nIVX 't. 1 , a . y s of a _. ,- o. ani 9z_ �, JI a y ".d Y ti17� _- F -td?J -Y7�1V V �.,, r� lAkl 'I& �,{ ,4 .4°t . l�, .. 'u4`.- af�ti�' I - 1: I I )i ,- I �_.,.- M C6t' «mow I. , I F I go �" r I. I R ( I 3115 1 ./1 - _ '-„, _ _ 1 tq. 1, (� I1, ++ N� .7.0>f S d� u r" p ! h G il � , :F/ ,� /�4�} jw� Cl r � Y�// - .. M 3.1 L' p� � l C F1 t 'z Q C - 7d 371s r w� I I, 31 <{} a a 8 ul S j/ /LN'V7d�� S`�+Yrl] L- ' s �� en�� ` ' „4#!'11 w I rl. I F -, 1� ' �� �}� �' l�^-� - ���'E ._� �"y Fly � � I� �d I IF_'t, , I -� ' ' j "-- J 4 1 _ • - b o » r , s -a ,r''•or Via: I m8 i I _ _ i _. ' , �1 r x� rq R l k �l 1 L I i c ., h 1 :'ihlk. u � I W C ,! cD r a �r I L 4 u , Z i , o v. O I,,, r d ,way' � ,x 1 I _ �° G r -F h , ��,55.� a li, %SII J L _ � _ _ - r 4 y k � a ti I t �tM1 » �, ,1 �F 1 t•�J , �� 11 C1, .A J I ,I —I - .{ .1. ter+ Al '44,"e1F, '. , 17 4. LY .- i. " k `, ' k ,?I lY l -a C a L� , LU a1 'I ,. I', 0 4 ? I � I� � a l� f- a W J Z_ �, _ 0, ,H r- ,I 'rte Cl) - i �+4{i RA R d"It IA� Ai 6-1 N-1 . t3 g T OL , .� ` -- vi14 N }SII G -- '- � W % tT 9 _0 ij� U W _ - - �� _ �tw­— LTJ -----� r I �`i I „A, J aII ?� ° I y f J QW �� �1 v �I o� �, - 1 u I W I W je)�- 1� \ �. _ a, - - - � I i " - v�bl e; I) K 1 'l � , 4. �„ '�°3 \ I U Illr.�� t p II 1 1 ��� Q ti I. rv`)° I D I -I 0- j ,>, N tl \ - - O . � ' ,li I �� ' rr, ',, •r'3 f )r}- . i' �,_ h 14 'I ' J � __---r --1ryw -o I _ - ter" , Ill _ 1t , -- , ) � ,r---- 'x-, 'A f �1k.117 i � I �� I J7 -I., W ') , -;'�, S ,,w1 O \_' _, Z Z ' !1 . J ,11 '<v - - ,..�-. a Qy ', _•_ I �..-,� /✓J , I p ' ; '1. Ir � i,.,, , 4 L _ ._n !" z L.1'. l pp �\ , h. . ,vj pj E-' w�. '��- <l�. _ '{ ,r, : . zs3 , ._._ �" r--" - -- ....- I1.L 'f �, 'Ir ,f 3"�, �',�dl.11 r 0o J yIIIft F h S �� I { 1 / II / {� p# YY j W Q , ! I r pl 7 x "Yh �. I `aY'- .N�-�---'T� ^�^'_-�'�- �, "£- �1_ I "x, 1 I'° ' = < -'� , - _ ! ('� )/,''�)� h�'pl4 -r � .._--_.�.'_ r Y. 17 { i �' -..9 ' I, IIL ,� t1 x } 1 .,,,y. r r 1 -. I 1 �,'�' /� � -- '`.--'-i _ "e: Y' '�" I 1 C�'�'1"� ' JI ' xr I l '�T' „y ' I I�f r- .. r ,� Y. ',4 v 1Ft w. N t___ �. ,_ "JI Li'' g i 27 j ,y '-�zwd ,Cri', �- ! £ i r ?I �i � i� 4 a �A �II , r �� W W !_ '^__"-.r- 4 ,dh Y� c'3-yti U 't_ C� '1: 1 �i d Y . !� , JI' ) "I ��_��- - _ 9 I v ImIII p -_ \ \ \� y. r f '1 * fi�11M11 '; iD - �� , V W 1 - j I �� ', , 1 14�k W T y r N I . 4 Y nl I - , - : .gid' A I . 1 n51•- ynv���� v, h , yrs, a11 F { � I - J 7 ,4 J o 'T iw....-. '�'_2d W��'�' '1 __^ Al `XIt, , ,t 3, �'�.... k :.'S::'. r1 , I ,C' Z § ! fiI TIO If d O J , r IIIAI _ «I y � , r I 1.1 7 ' -Y �* W �' I 1.1 A - _ {•-v r A' �'� L;o 11 W W I I 0 Z - __-_ . II �t , I� k' r -� w 6Y ^'T^_'._„---•T' " , � 11 i.,wl '��yy,�� J G I �1 , N W VI d JIf) I '�- � � -__- , I _, ,^,____•-•-^-„-",_ ___+...-.^'^' ^_'" � . "b ih'rd'" wo m m l-- 4- _ -- ,F: I ,, '' W Yom � _. - � -1 � 1 � ---'^-"`_"'"_ y „ 9 fI- A _ 1-1`'-i� _ r _- - t� � 11 I I I UIC� _...W'"- '_�. _.»„-,r_:..-..__. - !' I�'R ` > y� A ! ti" , t :' i I - . �. / h Ali � � X r I r�d' . ( - , .. III A . V _y 'L 1- * �. V �. �" ''� - v. r Ir U,,) p , v 1, r1 ,.. I " � o G 4 . , Z a W J ,' l� ' C .. N W J I sL �) — if, ; Q 1 1 J a.0 WQ �'� _7 I - I I' . W4 F F � ' n'xt I �I'a. '. Al AN mar - , 7 A, d 7 C , t f. C i'f ` w' ¢ p (� e I L Ill r� _ I ti ' , ,, ., I __ w , u,w kn w Z 2 "• 1, ,1 C 4- K I >cIf _ 7- 4 a IN "' -z V. JI U C'., h Q I 1 jo ,z '4 _ I. I C ., 7 _ I AlI %%d {' 7! 1 �� �- , , I,� r I1 ,I L W J- a I 1 4 Q_ , ._.�� XI IY t'd „ ',I o — i :, I ?f )) n '" _ �'I f �I I I L-� C \ < � .. - 47 .0 I ` I, ", er o V t ,1 "_., ,r I _7 r 'F V �g i i O F - .. _ _- .. ' __ —_ '_2 i- - _. - _ - - _ q h Q 1 - --_I _ 1 1.1<3 , . I A y l . 1� W 11 �l { L(/ f I I� Ir 1 1 ,' yn. 1 Ir t '', , O IM 13 4 �) ,__ L� (Al 1 �I , a r„[: Fa -e _ I 4 ____ Ilk_ _ _ _ I_ ./ - I I TQM 3, r ,I i r,i �, . 6 T Y T T IY ' _ �2 ' p <:L , __/((.� D a ' ± F � ,y' 0 o �f- � �^ C, 1' 4 �' °12 AV y N - -_ _ -__ _ Ili _ - 1 �„ _.e,+�kn^' n•,nn..e+ s 7 _ [ I ^N-v f � ` S ..yy. wl x.r ta•A r _ � I , ' �1 7 �� I V ; i , d t # 7 I 'i � I "11 1'a. , 11 ° • '' - - 1 - I v � _-. r I3,, _ I 1i __ �__ ..._ _� � _ I ,_r"` q at, I I ..- - - - - .. _ �_- -- .- - --- - -- — _ I- - i - - - - ' - 1 1 r1 - - Y -...--.-.�..._..,.._.__�-._,-_..______.. __. _.�_ __ .....- ---_..._"`� _. Irl n1 'r Ill �. --1 --, hl 'H t 1 1A 1 1 L It A, U q � fIl 'l L, I , , ' 1 � L W.4 ( 1 IJ � I ,,�„ F � j �_._. _ Ill , - r ) 1 �S i E. I 1 : rJ i 1 I, `a ' a '\ - ll� I 1d --'I � _ - T" .' - , z , : U. , " - - 1 - A . Ia,: I I- a '1 _ +', ,! ..", I W I _ L � 1 ,.� _ \ r �� , 1 n I ., 11 ' ii i�! 1 I I WO I- IJ _ l I 1 P cY S \ Z ,0m a -n I -y C lk\ .-, N Q .t NAt, ''4a, I / A lU IJ _� . II- N O f ^ m I N Y d N O �I I' j, ° d' Y15 . - ..l,i II 1 :: __ coL1 IiI 7 .L`. \ n .r N a M i N d 1 t- Q'd"' N11 - Al. 0 , Z b -I ¢ _{. , I , 1 , W ❑ 0. 1�. m @4, {y�ji[GO .�' ' t 1 cc \A- m I I .1 1 1 1 n Y ) G �F CJ Or l IJ, I N r ❑ 3 <l 3 R W ,- d , Y S u 1' F V) Q I r 0 ❑ 1 2 Z Q 1 M" OI O 101/1 N y .'fir "I1 t1" l.-'kl _ F J W r E, a m I _ _ 0 m . 1m - 'I jr �I - - - __ _._ __. _.. ` ) r t' t, w I m a - a O a G ¢ p gra, tm II I .� 3/v1'7 .A 1.�13C 03'd a sp',� r0 ¢ m ❑ a N a>, c rn 1. v ', - - I�. .' } ' ' - 2f,� F(Z,pp -, � ❑ O'Ow2C t ;a r --__ ---_.�__— ,_ --___._--,__-.__.._ ___-•. 7. ¢,R'W 2 w IY ¢ w g" -------------- ---- .. w a a w , —h r -7 AJ1 a'3doed I ^ - � � - � Oa m F _ - ---- -- - . _. �* i F U) $ ¢N ❑ X Z - 1 W 7I it (L w )l- n� I -I,� 1 u., . - n__ - - _ 3.L�W ' .1;1U.i.i, I 74117 JW\dd n?O_LG I _ ' ' I I I O _..''1✓ '3„-1 ,v J 1.avyY' I _ 13i�JN 3Wdi�� av-i7 -t: � 1 1 �fNrL.:/X£� ._._� --- --- '- — --- FiCY', -__._-- -- �._ 3 ,.� it 1 '' ---_..._ -t---'� I --- I = — I AD \ sI 4 P n SN700 JNI1dC 1 � § ' {" :"l ---- — ---- Z Z - a„ n I Z ca 1rt _ I17� 4 - NI ;I . r S 1 I" __ QI _j ,I , 1 W i coy « rs J >� 'I `OPF m �`! I IS , . _ '��' M I-�_ � 'O I, / I 1 ^ �' II Al 6,ycil- , fes w - - - _ v � "' ' I t lJ 0 v - Qd � � (. F" m� s ," t . - r .,8! I h ' < a' " 0 I III Q _, - - -- - riI1 v I C I d.� s -�� t � 5 �1- � - ' � A f — - _ � r � � � n � � ' �' A �f �- -- `I' .- 11 , � fl } � \l r , ,r" .' *& 1 tr,. 4 N 1 , ly D, I � � _ ly e � - A,1 r,,' 'k - . - 1 N LL 'I,I .A _ � dl _ th .. I 1 I , ir ( A�i�" t " 'o' m 1. W dY v.q.1. .* e 1�+' "� -f, '� I %k Z _ '�r _ .S 1 , `4 � I ?p o� -la,,�b_ _m � l _ Kdw'.'' C1C I r tIb r *I, + s. °v-L /// - ' r - r.r m r � 1 1 EII 1 `-, VV o o q p `�a �i m 1i.�1' r Al m V} " 11 »� ,Ir N Q f - , < v3' ;�p.IA "Ilf n0 _, .,P 2 Al - �� "� , r 3 t, ,4 .w v�,' ' ' ' J. I 1 1 � - # N Qt 1 ,4. N rp °41 Y r11 � - -11 - hr „_. ,p II �J I I N 1 1 I �,r; r ; I 1 Yld,ry ~ �F1%� +T Y` `" ll `^.m,,, •l'n I 1 I \ I . r , I r �¢ r,' I I r i Gnn - w �h5s„, 4 21 "^"m_,...__.._ _ _ ,n o u`A. I I a' , t 1 ' I �„' - f L '}n'. ,•$I L $�1 I I. 1,, " .a} 1 x r Fes-- ti u FQ K,1};�y, I "" r ��!!,,, UP V r"RK Vsn9 I. r, '� V 1� t 1' I . �'P'�3' ' - < Q .. of C 1 O <= I I ,' ,. I1 Yy1 1151l1 a 0 r-a ww -1 tib dk{ •' q'- ' t ''•. �I �¢ {µ h q , 0 x i+`.ox ao '„ f' rLIh7i��� L _ } Co a : v� (!1 F- „°. v°- to i. of F{ r 0. r o a 1 ,�'� bI'F`'�'�'' a`� . ) . - - W �4L 4i t Wa ": `ac�f,t r 11 7C .9- ,C '"` �,Ii : ��ll r , 'n I - m t -F LL 4 W. I ille INv" w:r1NA3 ' fl Ir tk�. o ., . v 'y ' „Q' G � -K -4 .I.1 v .o e' 4" 'kls `)r If,il,A•',dl t ' !�',[, I „ t- w-. fn>w ,� n . ,.'.� p 9n ,, R I !` P 'ox1 4" t.. .* i yr- LlIll - - I .- . - '',I ` . . , ..r .. gl{ J, It ' "'ia �w K »"'ter 4. Y�� Ir x °j,.��� h�I�br . T- Mt` 1. S � r -'tl fy. „ �, ry VV i 1 i, • 17 1{" aI t P 4 1,4,"�_'9 I ,,. _ 4 I " I I .r { t .1 ; t ,sT4'> ' ,. (!y ill" 6 ` A ,. - _ ,- ' d 1. - r 1AV s , JI 'L I n 1 } % I L ti �'\ I I.Jy6 RR, i Olb A, '� t r Fy . ' 4 , x .vr 11 I I .,Y„ I r ... : -' ._ ' i - - 1� 1� ,. f tidy' °.,r r r ,?r . ,, P f '�a ., 1,F iia s . � ..r. - .. , �, d, s'F ' ,,, o / .'.,r. �.�"' 1 �,'.Y ¢IJ .r . n u.: �,..' ,n: �r 4. i .I . ^; 4,}y „ ,. , ._'. Y,. 1 ,., r 1 t r .n. - :41�'�I _ 'Iv^ x V - :pyx , ;t . Jx`U' ,• :6 '1!'Iu Y.: 1 .0 ,5 • .In�: Y! [ , V , fij5 . :a",&'/t �,I, , �.i, h +it} p '. _ i „r :� ,Yr[7 c I "L , e. %°!y, ,,.i _ " ` """ . F , '"i '�, tint , S ,w. N;: ,xr.. ° , r .A,' r 3 5, - r ,il - {,�y^. 5 F fJA A {, 7,,, r. "ll 1 - ,l 1: - j' „F„ F ' . . -Y r.I 'cYi T,✓rI J .. - H , 1 a : ' . iL� I f n ' ,: . .,,,--, „!_x ,, i, ' :',, .y,.^. },,, ij . \. ,r.. .. ,"rl�an" , !' .'Y' I. !,iD[ 'H. ♦ .,. "Lr _li 'n „ r ', ,, 1 ' r:.; Y sl1,,,, *gI,',xl ' _A-�,. 7 I,I. . 1. .g '4; .0. . b �SIt1 , 1. 1 ," 1: l4 _ - - 'I ,1,. I I �, r . IYr ' � _ � 11• r _ r �,,h,51 � ,,, - v�-,,k- 91 sUdrtLE-7 I'd 2K Cws� PECON[C ASSOCIATES, INC. 10010-0006 Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 January 27, 1990 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 -----" Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Dear Mr . Orlowski : \ As a result of the meeting with Robert Kassner in discussion on the drainage for the above referenced project , a telephone call was made to Barton Cass of Sidney B. Bowne & Son , and the following points were reviewed : 1 . ROOF DRAINAGE : Even though the roof drainage is clean rain water, it was explained by the writer that both the D. E. C. and SLtuthold Town Trustees felt very strongly that this should—be contained on site and released slowly because of its acid rain content , so as not to shock the adjacent Bay area . 2. PARKING LOT RUN-OFF: The improvements over the present parking lot run-off , specifically the replacement of the paved area with crushed stone , the regrading of the slope so as to retain the drainage on site , and the installation of french drains were reviewed in detail . Because of the concern that the french drain , over a period of time, might be clogged with silt , it was suggested by the writer that an ADS slotted drainage pipe , eight (8) inch diameter , be installed in the bottom one-third of the french drain . This installation would be similar to highway shoulder drainage design . The ADS pipe would then be piped to the leaching pools for the roof drains and the leaching pools capacity would be enlarged by extra surrounding backfilling of stone material . Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board January 27, 1990 Page 2 3 . SURFACE DRAINAGE IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING OFFICE AND SHOP : The ground elevation in the area is approximately three ( 3 ) feet . It is also a highly compacted clay area , and the installation of leaching pools could not be effective . The only work planned in this area is the removal of the paved surfaces and replaced with crushed stone to reduce and slow down surface run-off. It was explained that , with the roof run-off being collected and the parking lot run-off being collected , the only run-off in this area would be what actually fell on the site , which would be of a very small amount compared to what has resulted previously. Based on this discussion , it was collectively agreed that installation of leaching pools for this area would not be a practical solution . Based on the above telephone discussion with Mr. Cass , it was suggested that Planning Board approval to include a notation by the Planning Board that the french drain would include the following : 1 . French drain to include installation of ADS slotted drainage pipe and piped to the leaching pools ; 2 . Increase the gravel backfill of the leaching pools from three (3 ) feet to four (4 ) feet ; and 3 . These changes would be included on the as-built site plan after construction . It is hoped that the above resolvement of the drainage questions will now make it possible for site plan approval to be received . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. L. e r l o n E. Wig gn. a'h . D. , M. E. President cc : Mr. William LieblienA. Barton Cass j'< 1 L Town Hall. 53093 Main Road O P.O. Box 1179j y1$� Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 7651938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 22, 1990 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3.2 , 3. 3 , 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr . Wiggin: Enclosed is a copy of the Town Engineers report dated December 14 , 1989 concerning the proposed boat storage. The Planning Board accepts this report and requests that you comply with its recommendations. Very truly yours, Vtt ir owski, Jr -fn Encl. SIDNEY Be BOWNE & SON Sidney 8 Bowns.P.E.L.S. Roland Anders 11922-19591 Francis J.Lvncn Chester C. Kelsey.P E.L.S. 45 Manor Road Phillip SpnlOtzhaue Robert A.Stanton.P.E. `�,j Joseph F Stegman Robert w. Brown.L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787I Q 1 William T Styne Zabdlel A.Blackman. P.E..L.S. (S 16) 724'0611 P'phara B. Weber Frank J.Antelomaso.P.E. p ��Q George A Style. P.E. II 1C"" Jerry D Almont,P.E. George L.Fagan.Jr.Ph D.,P.E. _,,..� Frank Capobianco. C.E. �,,,'.,�Paul F Stevens.P E.Roger L.Cocchl.P.E. LANflIi�C i' December 14, 1989 Thomas R Pynchon.L S. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Site Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. 87482) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal waters. Since roof runoff is relatively free of contaminants we would recommend that the overflow system be allowed as indicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONKS?ULTING _ENGINEERS ABC:c Ig A. BARTON LASS, P.E. cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer MIF/R • ,i PORT OF EGYPT ''i A REQUEST SHOULD BE MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: The drainage plans, specifically in relation to parking, and proposed building, must be revised so as to be consistent with the up-dated site plan received in this office on April 19, 1989 . 2. All maps must be signed and sealed by the licensed New York State professional responsible for preparing the plans. ' Site grades, grading, and drainage for the parking areas must be shown. All areas shown as available for parking must actually be available for parking. . A landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Board. Existing landscaping in the Westerly front yard should be indicated as such. April 19th plan shows it as parking. V '• The location of all dumpsters and above ground fuel storage tanks must be shown on the site plan. NOTE THAT - Plans have been sent to the Town Engineer for review. C,,-NrOTT-ON for a Negative Declaration. (read reasons for Neg. Dec. ) NEG. DEC: REASONS SUPPORTING THTS TIETF.RMTAIATTQ (These reasons are to be added to the usual list where appropriate) The applicant is to provide a positive on-site system to collect roof runoff and site storm drainage. An oil separater for the boat repair and washdown area is provided, thus there will be no direct discharge into the bay. A porous surface of crushed stone is to be used' to absorb minor ✓spills, and reduce direct run off into the bay. she Planning Board has required that a landscape plan be ubmitted for review; with particular emphasis on the road frontage. Below are items that the Planning Board wishes be addressed: The storm drainage leaching peal s_r=-rsM set -up as an overflow system. Additional leaching Pools sa�;uli b= ;:_st3i? to up ere pollutants between the separation 1�az_n and the tidal --heck valve at the boat basin. Additional leaching pools should be installed for the site drainage for the gravel area. /. 7 G�a� - r FFOG� TO D } SL SawA914,N.Y. 11871 f (516)785-1838 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Applicationg/26/88 Filing Fee Date Recd New Use—Change of Use Re-Use_,,,Extens on of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Mts Flan (Data of Approval other S ) Pee y Name of Business or Site Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . Location of Site Route 23 , Address of Site, if available Route 2b , Soutnoia Name of Applicant Port of Eg�n er rim , Inc . � • Address of Applicant Route ou o , Telephone Person to Be responsible for construction William Lieb ein Telephone765-2445 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Under contract to purchase Owner of- Fee Title to Land Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . Addresse 5 Southold Telephone - Site Plans Prepared yPeooniC soca License No. L. 1Utn111 Address One Bootleg Alley, Greenport, N.Y. Telephone 4//-UUJU Total Land Area of Site 94476 Sq.Ft. Zone DistrictC-Light Industria Existing Use of Site marina Proposed Use of Site marina Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 6015 total sqft. sqft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed" Structures) 25440 tots sgft. sgft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building s) 77-9T— Percent 7-9T— Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable 4 . b% M par s a g Percent of Lot for Landscapinq(where applICab e t Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S._ 6 . 0 ft. (building other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals NO Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suf o Count: Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site?NO (see note below) If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION ( EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVA' OF SITE PLAN BY THE..PLANNING BOARD. NOTE: Permits obtained for fuel storage on adjacent site (approval date 4/2/86) � I APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Elise. Thomas being duly sworn, depose �• and says that he resides at 855 Brigantine Drive , Southold in the State of New York, and that a is the .owner of the above pr .. or that he is the f the Port of E pt Fnterprises,(Title (Specify whether Partners 4ftch is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by -the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed .in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed &A4 (Owner) Sworn to before me this day o47 +I, u 19 J No Signed _(_6 41C 010 212nm, -64 (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) 7Mi6ririk A j ' A STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 JAMES A. KUZLOSKI FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTORR ;1 {�� Ij ��"� COMMISSIONER June 29, 1989 , 1 _? Bennett Orlowski Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall >✓_ _..- D 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Route 25, Southold Our review of the subject plans was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. The entire frontage of the site must be curbed, and the shoulder must be rehabilitated across the site's frontage. Three driveways would seem to be appropriate for this site, one being the existing intersection with Old Main Road which might be relocated to the east to better service the adjacent parcel. This would have to be approved by the Town of Southold. At present, land on the south side of Route 25 is being utilized for boat storage and other business. The shoulder and pavement in this area has been severely eroded. Curbing and shoulder restoration must also be provided for this area. The subject applicant is utilizing a portion of state property for his operation. A review of our records reveals that this property was never conveyed to another party and is presently not available for abandonment or sale. Therefore, the applicant must contact Mr. F. Persan of our Real Estate Group at the above address and request a Use and Occupancy Permit. The Town of Southold has required the applicant to provide drainage information. Drainage proposals must address both sides of Route 25 in this area. On the north side, a culvert presently drains from the state highway onto the adjacent railroad tracks. The existing drainage system in this area may require cleaning or restoration, since the developer filled the marsh area along state right-of-way. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Bennett Orlowski June 29, 1989 Page 2 Please send five copies of revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, T. C. HOFFMAN Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz TCH:JH:JS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK• fr/1y/ JAPP FROM DECISION OF BUILDING INSPECTORAPPEAL NO. 37 7CG DATE .............................. TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,;N;Y,;iurY 1, (We) Port.of..E9ypt Flrterprises.3.Inc......... .....of ....Rte:...25........................ Nome of Appellant Street and Number Southold ....N . ................HEREBY APPEAL TO .. ......................................................... ...... .. Municipality State THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ON APPLICATION FOR PERMIT NO. .................................... DATED Feb : 25.;,. 1988..................... WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED TO Port of EWA.Enterprises,,,IK ......Mdgn,W,iggla.0A Name of Applicant for permit of One Bootleg Alley ( eenportt N.Y. ............................ .................................... Street and Number Municipality State ( ) PERMIT TO USE ( ) PERMIT FOR OCCUPANCY (X ) permit to construct 1. LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY .,,., 5,,,;,,Soo,iih,q) ri,,,,,,,,,,, ,C„Li,ghtIndustria,l, 4 Street /Hamlet / Use District on Zoning Map District 1000 Section 056 Block & Lots- 10.1-11-13.2-3.2-3.3-4-6.t b.................Current Owner Port of FAyot Enterprises, Inc. Mop No. Lot No. P r i or Owner Lieblein family from 1946 to 1978 2. PROVISION (S) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE APPEALED (Indicate the Article Section, Sub- section andd P rograph of the Zonin grdinance by number. Do not quote the Ordinance.) Article VII Section 100-8� (bulk & parking) 97.12 tlands� 3. TYPE F APPEAL Appeal is ma a erewi h for (please check appropriate box) ( X ) A VARIANCE to the Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Map ( ) A VARIANCE due to lack of access (State of New York Town Law Chap. 62 Cons. Laws Art. 16 Sec. 280A Subsection 3 4. PREVIOUS APPEAL A previous appeal XK44 (has not) been mode with respect to this decision of the Building Inspector or with respect to this property. Such appeal was ( ) request for a special permit ( ) request for a variance and was made in Appeal No. ................................Dated ...................................................................... REASON FOR APPEAL ( ) A Variance to Section 280A Subsection 3 ( X ) A Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested for the reason that Donn ZB1 (Continue on other side) BOARD OF APPEALS.TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. NOTICE TO to the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold ADJACENT TO: PROPERTY OWNER Armando Cappa William Lieblein and Wife C & L Realty Main Rd . Central Avenue Main Road Southold , N. Y. 11971 Greenport , N . Y . 11944 Southold , N . Y . 11971 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold torequest a Variance (90eEYaKlis3Ede*K6t()((150YcWPi(MtIX441J &J) [circle choice) 1. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: marina with sales ; repair facilities and boat storage 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: C-Light Industrial I 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request the following relief: front yard and side yard within 75 ' of wetland variances I 5. That the provisions of the Southold Town Zoning Code applicable to [he relief sought by the under- signed are art. VIII sec. 100-81 (bulk. & Park.j art. XI sec. 100-119.2 (w/in 75' of water) art. I sec. 97.12 [ ] Section 280-A, New York Town Law for approval of access over right(s)-of-way. 6. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. (516) 7d5-1809. 7. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Board of Appeals; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: May 10 , 1988 Peconic Associates , Inc . Petitioner Owners ' Names : port of EQWJ E teMLLsSes. Inc. Post Office Address Rte . 25 Southold , N. Y . 11971 .Tel . No . ( 516 ) 765-2445 [Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal to be attached for convenience purposes . ] QUESTIO.4Ir�RE TO BE COMPLETED ANO SUBMITTED NITH YOUR APPLIC:.TION FOIMS TO THE BOARD OF "WEALS Please complete , sign and return to the Office of the Board of Appeals with your completed application forms . If " Yes" is answered to any questions below , please be sure to depict these areas on your survey (or certified sketch ) , to scale , and submit other supporting documenta- tion. 1 . Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours ? Yes N 2 . a ) Are there any areas which contain Wetland grasses ? (Attached is a list of the wetland grasses defined by Yestl ) Town Code , Ch . 97 for your reference . ) *b) Are there any areas open to a waterway without bulkhead ? Yes t1J 3. Are there existing structures at or below ground level , such as patios , foundations , etc? Yes 4. Are there any existing or proposed fences , concrete barriers , decks , etc? Yes CJ 5.. If project is proposed for an accessory building or structure , is total height at more than 18 feet above Yes 110average ground level ? State total : _ ft . 6. If project is proposed for principal building or structure , is total height at more than 35 feet above Yes N average ground level ? State total : 35 ' - ridge 45' ft. 7. Are there other premises under your ownership abutting O this parcel ? If yes , please submit copy of deed. Yes Nc 8. Are there any building permits pending on this parcel (or abutting land under your ownership , - if any ) ? Yes N� State Permit # and Nature : 9. Do state whether or not applications are pending concerning these premises before any other department or agency (State , Town , County , Village , etc . ) : PIanning . Board applications are being submitted Ye �N Town Board Yes �L ) Town Trustees applications are being submitte County Health Department es 18 Village' of Greenport Yes N. Y . S . D . E . C. applications are being su mitte es ri Other s N 10 . Is premises pending a sale or conveyance ? If yes , please submit copy of names or purchasers and conditions of sale . (from contract ) . Yes 11 . Is new construction proposed in the area of contours at 5 feet or less as exists? Yes Ncl 12 : If new construction is proposed in an area within 75 feet of wetland grasses , or land area at an eleva- tion of five feet or less above mean sea level , have you made application to the Town Trustees for an inspection for possible waiver or permit under Yes tic the requirements of Ch . 97 of the Town Code ? 13 . Please list present use or operations conducted upon the subject property at this time marina - boat storage - boa - ales and proposed same *Please submit photographs for Clic record . I cortify that the above statements are true and are being submitted for reliance by the Board of Appea in cons ' ring iny application . Srinature Property Ureter ) Authorized Age 3/;;7 lk r „r '• � Town Hall. 53095 blain Road P.O. Box 1179 P t .w ;✓ Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 7651938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 13, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10 .1,11 & 13. 2 1000-3-.2 ,3 .3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised storm drainage plan (dated May 5, 1989) that you submitted with your letter of August 17, 1989. This letter is to follow up a call made to your office on September 6 , 1989, whereby the following message was left on the answering machine. In order for the Board to continue its review, test hole data is required. This was previously mentioned during our recent meeting on July 21, 1989. The Town' s Engineering Consultant has asked for this information so that the drainage plans can be reviewed. Upon receipt of the requested test hole data, the Board and the Engineering Consultant will be able to proceed with the review of the drainage system. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: William Lieblein Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals rgk I :o: lj ADDRESS: DATE: SUBJECT: COMMENTS: h1--r GNE-I I9lRE n,64. S/TE pL ,4irS FaR PaRT oFE6yp7- taTaPYf&5< Fo ZT ►vo N.4t) j3,�- rE p /r— cvE Signature A'ECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 August 17 , 1989 AW : 810 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Southold , New York Dear Bob : Enclosed are revised plans for the Port of Egypt dry stack storage . Revisions incorporate items of our recent discussions , correspondence from Sydney Bowne , and suggestions from the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . Merlo E . Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E . President Enclosures cc : Mr . William Lieblein MEW/iw Y V � Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 J TELEPHONE t516) 765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 21 , 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10. 1 ,11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-3. 2 , 3 . 3 , 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Enclosed is a copy of a letter received from the State of New York Department of Transportation concerning their review of your plans. Please keep the board informed as to your response to the States requests. The board will need fiv e copies of the revised plan to send to the Regional Permit Engineer. �7 ry truly yon Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard Jay Schondebare Board of Appeals Town Trustees SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SOo Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.L C�Ol f_y �, Roland Antlers (7922-22-1959)9) '�""'�"`"`�"�" Franck J Lynch Chester C Kelsey, P E., L S 45 Manor Road Phillip Schlotzhauer Robert A. Stanton, P E. Joseph F.Slegman Robert W Brown. L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 William T. Styne Zabtliel A. Blackman, P.E.. LS 515) 724_051 1 ( j `j /�, Ric hartl B Weber Frank J Antetomaso RE 1 L: George A. Style. RE Jerry AlmonP E Georgee L Fagan. ,Jr..Ph D.P.E. JUL 1410 Frank Capobianco C E Paul F Stevens, P E. iM Y - Roger Coccni-PE '�:fr "! Thomas R. Pyncho n. L S. ---•_. _ _ July 12, 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Site Plan, Arshamomoque Town of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87482) Gentlemen: We recently received a copy of a revised site plan on the above captioned proposed improvement. We therefore supplement our original comments with the following. The latest plan indicates twelve leaching basins to dispose of the roof storm water. This office calculated that to impound runoff from a storm of 2" intensity, fifteen leaching basins would be required. This is the accepted method for determining the capacity required. The developer has applied a factor which allows for reducing the capacity required due to percolation into the soils. This is not usually per- mitted for this type of computation. From what the applicant states, the N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation has approved the submitted plan which shows overflow piping from the roof leaching system to the tidal waters. A copy of the State Permit should be reviewed before approval . If this is per- mitted by NYSDEC, a safety factor is built into the system which will allow us to approve the 12 basin system with overflow piping. We believe that the additional leaching pools between the sedimen- tation basin and the boat basin mentioned in our original letter should be placed as stated. The sedimentation basin should intercept any potential pollutants before any washwater runoff reaches the leaching pools. If the pools were installed between the wash area and sedimen- tation basin, the washwater could enter the soils before the benefit of the "trap" would be realized. MINEOLA a SMITHTOWN a NEW YORK CITY a CLEARWATER An Equal OPPPrtunity Employer M/F/H Mr. Bennett Orl�ki, Jr.19hairman . TOWN OF SOUTHOL July 12, 1989 Page Two If we may be of further assistance in this matter, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERSS l�t.za1 4zd4-- 5 A. BAR N CAS, P. ABC:clg d xc: Merlon E. Wiggin, PhD, M.E. n (Peconic Assoc, Inc. ) Raymond Dean (SBB) Y B. B 0 W n e G S 0 n 1 0 SIDNEY B. BOWNE S SO* 0 Sidney B Bowne,P.E.L.S 'L-1- Roland Anders (1922-1959) � V + Francis J. Lynch Chester C. Kelsey. P E.. L.S. 45 Manor Road D l/ Phillip Schlotzheuer Robert A.Stanton. P E. -" Joseph F Stegman Robert W Brown. L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 1178 ,,``,, William T Styne Zabdiel A Blackman, P E. L S (516) 724-0611 �+M 2 619 Richard B Weber Frank J Antetomaso, RE George A Style. P.E Jerry D.Almont. P.E p• George L Fagan.Jr.Ph D.,P E Frank Capobianco. C.E - Pa,il F. Stevens. RE Roger L c°"hl. P E. June 23, 1989 Tncmas R Pynchon. L S Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr., Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises Preliminary Site Plan Arshamomoque (SBB No. 87482) Dear Mr. Orlowski : Review of the roof drainage system on the above referenced plan indicates that 15 ten ft. diameter 4 ft. deep leaching basins would be required to contain a 2 inch storm. The plan only indicates nine such basins. A leaching basin system to provide for the drainage of the areas to be covered with crushed stone would require five 10 ft . diameter, 4 ft . deep basins. Positioning of these basins would depend on the grading plan which has not been received. Generally two of the basins would be located in the vicinity of the existing office and shop: two in the area west of the proposed building and one north of the proposed building. Overflow from this system should be provided to the tidal waters by means of 15 inch diameter pipe for ease in maintenance and to prevent blockage by debris. Two additional leaching pools (8 ft. diameter x 4 ft. deep) between the sedimentation basin and the boat basin are required to provide for leaching of any pollutants which are not trapped by the sedimentation basin. The following should also be provided : 1. Test hole data. 2. A baffle between the influent pipe & effluent pipe of sedimentation basin to prevent sediment from plugging pipe. 3. Clean out plug or equivalent in effluent elbow of sedimintation basin. 4. Grading Plan. 5. New York State Department of Environmental Conversation review due to discharge into tidal waters. MINEOLA a SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY a CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM Mr. 4ennett Orli , Jr.,#airman Town of Southol* • Planning Board June 23, 1989 Page Two The Board may also want to consider requiring that the applicant post a maintenance bond with the Town to insure periodic clean out of the sedimentation basin. If we may be of further assistance with this proposal please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS A. BARTON CASS ABC:rp STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE. N.Y. 11788 JAMES A. KUZLOSKI FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR �i 2 11 q17 fy' r"� COMMISSIONER June 29, 1989 r }{ - Bennett Orlowski '�!_. JUL 3 1969 Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Route 25, Southold Our review of the subject plans was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. The entire frontage of the site must be curbed, and the shoulder must be rehabilitated across the site's frontage. Three driveways would seem to be appropriate for this site, one being the existing intersection with Old Main Road which might be relocated to the east to better service the adjacent parcel. This would have to be approved by the Town of Southold. At present, land on the south side of Route 25 is being utilized for boat storage and other business. The shoulder and pavement in this area has been severely eroded. Curbing and shoulder restoration must also be provided for this area. The subject applicant is utilizing a portion of state property for his operation. A review of our records reveals that this property was never conveyed to another party and is presently not available for abandonment or sale. Therefore, the applicant must contact Mr. F. Persan of our Real Estate Group at the above address and request a Use and Occupancy Permit. The Town of Southold has required the applicant to provide drainage information. Drainage proposals must address both sides of Route 25 in this area. On the north side, a culvert presently drains from the state highway onto the adjacent railroad tracks. The existing drainage system in this area may require cleaning or restoration, since the developer filled the marsh area along state right-of-way. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER J, - Bennett Orlowski June 29, 1989 Page 2 Please send five copies of revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, r-(JI,i L T. C. HOFFMAN Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz TCH:JH:JS .10 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 June 30 , 1989 FP 3 1989 A. Barton CassSidney B. Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown , L . I . New York - 11787 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Storm Drainage Plan Dear Bart : Reference is made to a telephone conversation with Dorothy on June 30 , 1989 . Apparently the Town has provided you with an old Preliminary Site Drainage Plan and not the one finally submitted on 4/5/89 . I have enclosed a copy for your review. Please note that the drainage calculations take into account the leaching from percolation occurring simultaneously with the rainfall . This drainage plan is in accordance with previously received comments from D. E. C . , both for the site run off and the sedimentation catch basin used for the boat washing pad . D. E. C . Permit was received on this project in November of 1988. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to give me a call . Thank you . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E . Wiggin , Ph . D. ,M. E. President Enclosure : Storm Drainage Plan dated 4/5/89 cc : Southold Town Planning Board Mr . William Lieblein �' S. ,I ;v {i . . I N.Y. 11944 k - juN 3 0 KW Mull=TQW4 PLNNNIM1IC ' Tn * Y 53093 " d Sim .T(M -11971 Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Route 25, Southold Our `f"Ii Of t*0 subject plana was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my st*ff. LTi fr"e of the site must be curbed, and the shoulder must be re4iiilitstea acr6ss the site's frontage. Tbrse Yersyo pould seem to be appropriate for this site, one beim* the 0 kit 're'setion with Old Main Road which might be relocated to the east *, tir'+�it "' the adjacent parcel. This would have to be approved by the S M At t .pland on the south side of Route 25 is being utilized for boat ti a,ot*et business. The shoulder and pavement in this area has been ed. Curbing and shoulder restoration must also be provided for l-A�. Tbs" ; bEt ;Applicant is utilizing a portion of state property for his a A ,review of our records reveals that this property was never 41 ta•�snother party and is presently not available for abandonment or w. t s�It - afore, the applicant must contact Mr. F. Persan of our Real Estate 1iraµgq "th► above address and request a Use and Occupancy Permit. TWO; Tl a . of Southold has required the applicant to provide drainage I ion.- Drainage proposals must add7ees beth sides of Route 25 in this ,N 10AAi. ,Ad t north side a culvert l�a presently draipa from the state highway eA :.id1s adjacent railroad tracks. The existing drainage system in this area may mice cleaning or restoration, since the developer filled the marsh area long state right-of-stay. Bennett Orlowski June 29, 1989 Page 2 Please send five copies of revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, T. C. 11OFk7HAN Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopau99!!C-- TCH:JH:JS FDIKC�,_ N Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 20, 1989 Merlon Wiggin 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt SCTM #1000-56-6-6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, June 19, 1989. The Planning Board requested the following items: 1. The drainage plans, specifically in relation to the parking, and the proposed building, must be revised so as to be consistent with the up-dated site plan received by the Planning Board office on April 19, 1989. 2. All maps must be signed and sealed by the licensed New York State Professional responsible for preparing the Plans. ^ 3. Site grades, grading, and drainage for the parking areas must be shown. All areas shown as available for parking must actually be available for parking. 4. A landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Board. Existing landscaping in the westerly front yard should be indicated as such the April 19th plan shows it as parking. 5. Thelocationof all dumpsters and above ground fuel storage tanks must be shown on the site plan. Please note that the drainage plans have been sent to the Town Engineer for their review. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board make a determination under the State Environmental Quality Review Act of non-significance. Please see enclosed copy of the Negative Declaration. Twelve copies of revised site plans that comply with all of the above noted conditions and the negative declaration must be submitted before the Planning Board can proceed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ZVemy yours, r BENNETT ORLOWSRI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. jt �c�1FF0(K�O Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 06/28/89 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review Act and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency for this unlisted action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Applicant, Port of Egypt, proposes to erect a 25,440. sq. ft. boat storage building. SCTM #1000-56-6-6.1. The project has been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: An environmental assessment has been submitted, reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented• as planned. Because there has been no correspondence received from the Department of Health Services in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. Because there has been no correspondence from the Board of Trustees in the allotted time, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The Zoning Board of Appeals has responded and their concerns have been considered. The applicant will provide a positive on-site system to collect roof runoff and site storm drainage. An oil separator for the boat repair and washdown area will be provided, thus there will be no direct discharge into the bay. A porous surface of crushed stone will be used to absorb minor spills, and reduce direct run-off into the bay. The Planning Board has required that a landsca a Ian be 411]2 with particular emphasis on t e road frontage. The parking provided is satisfactory to the Planning Board. However, all outside storage racks are not to be utilized for boat storage during the Summer months; because area is needed for parking. The Planning Board has determined that the proposed facility is a needed facility in the community, and that the proposed location is environmentally appropriate. A copy of the site plan will be sent to you under separate cover. Further information can be obtained by contacting Jill M. Thorp, Secretary Southold Town Planning Board, Main Road, Southold, NY 11971. Copies mailed to the following: Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk county Planning Commission Robert Greene, DEC Commissioner Mohabir Perseud, Department of State Judith Terry, Town Clerk Building Department Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Applicant Planning Board Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 1 1971 TELEPHONE (516)7e5-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Robert Brown Sidney Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, 14Y 11787 Dear Mr. Brown: Pursuant to your agreement with the Town of Southold, the Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following: Application of (Major subdivision, minor subdivision, sit ) P_1kT A F ��TP T Hamlet SO4t zi/O.ZP MATERIAL SUBMITTED: File 11 Suffolk County Tax Map No. /000 - J6-yt—/v./ Sketch plan ' l Preliminary map Street Profiles Grading Plan Preliminary site plan Final Map Other .STD Qi+f Comments: SFF zr.3CNE� f1 nDL /T-Frn T�T3E /9�►D/?FSSE?1_i_ • Very t / s � BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. ,C&1IR.`fAN SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING B(Yic&D Below are items that the Planning Board wishes be addressed: =?:^L li i The storm drainage leaching poo,. �tstCM �. e set p as an overflow system. Additional leaching pools ai:asld r- icys:.aLled to c ke Grp more pollutants between the separat_on basin and the tidal check valve at the boat basin. Additional leaching pools should be installed for the site drainage for the gravel area. Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD STATE ROAD 25 P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1809 FAX No. (516) 765-1823 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS JUN 2 — (1p(� 11 GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN I'1 � CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. -'---- -' SERGE DOYEN, JR. SOUTNGLD TO,ad JOSEPH H. SAWICKI PLANNING BUS-!L1 JAMES DINIZIO, JR. COORDINATED S.E.Q.R.A. RESPONSE TO: Southold Town Planning Board, as Lead Agency FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals DATE: June 2, 1989 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. CTM #1000-56-6-3.2, 3. 3 , 4. , 6.1 Property Location: S/s Main Road, Southold In response to your May 17, 1989 Lead Agency coordination request, the following comments are furnished for your consideration: 1. This Board, by its letter dated September 26, 1988, reiterates its position recommending that the Planning Board take lead agency status (copy of letter attached citing reasons) ; 2. This Board, under SEQRA, has limited jurisdiction under Section 617.13 for Type II Actions, however, wishes to provide the following concerns and comments: a. Stormwater runoff - a description and evaluation of methods proposed for retaining all stormwater runoff, without leakage or drainage into the waterways, should be filed for consideration b. Activities and uses - a description of activities to be conducted relative to the proposed building should be described in specific detail, and sufficiently evaluated to determine possible effects on the environment, including coordination for vehicles and pedestrians at the site. - . • 4 0 • To: Southold Town Planning Board June 2, 1989 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. c. Drainage basins - location should be shown, including those ' de of thero osed buildin for evaluation of suitability an types of act�.vities for its necessity. d. Elimination of upland outside boat storage (as proposed by the applicant) will help to alleviate parking concerns. Attachment ( 9/26/88 ZBA letter) ' r O �rFL'L�`-c lam Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I.. N.Y. 11971 .,... . TELEPHONE (516) 7651809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. RGBER:F j. 00166b1SS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Southold Town Board of Appeals DATE: September 26 , 1988 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SEQRA Lead Agency County Tax Map #1000-56-6-4 Gentlemen: Upon reviewing applications which were recently filed with our office concerning the above premises, please be advised that the Board of Appeals has taken the following position under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) : 1. Application must be filed with the Southold Town Planning Board; 101 2. Recommend that the Planning Board take Lead Agency status for the following reasons: n a. the site plan elements and physical construction of 'UJ the roadway, drainage facilities, landscaping, will be major changes directly to the site; b. the application under consideration in this application before the Board of Appeals is not directly related to physical change of the land or wetland areas. 3 . Suggest that determinations be made by the Planning Board as to the sufficiency of parking spaces for the multiple uses existing at the site, after allowing for egress, ingress, loading, ramps, trailer lift parking, landscaping, etc. , if possible, in either a preliminary review or during the certification process. The applicant is simultaneously herewith advised that he must proceed through your office accordingly. Please keep us advised of developments under the Site-Plan and SEQRA processes. Thank you. cc : Office of the Town Trustees 2 1 / ' r A ITV � • ' . PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootle),Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 May 25 , 1989 Mr. Gerard P. Goehringer - Chairman Southold Town Board of Appeals Main Road - State Road 25 P. 0. Box 1179 Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Application No . 3770 and 3771SE Port of Egypt Dear Mr. Goehringer : Reference is made to your letter of May 22 , 1989 in regard to the above referenced project. Enclosed are the following : 0 Property Plan - 5 copies . o Project Site Plan - 5 copies . o Supplementary Parking Plan - 5 copies with letter of transmittal . 0 Site Survey - 1 copy. Based on conversations with the Owner, it is his intent to discontinue all outside rental storage with the construction of the proposed storage building . Thank you for your prompt and comprehensive follow-up of our telephone conversation . If we can be of further help , please do not hesitate to contact either Bill Lieblein or myself . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. 4erion E. Wig Ph . D. , M. E. President Enclosures : Per Listing Above . cc : Mr . William Lieblein J l r + r PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477.0030 Fax(516)477-0198 M E M O R A N D U M F O R T H E R E C O R D TO: Southold Town Planning Board FROM: Merlon E. Wiggin SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Building DATE : May 23 , 1989 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ Following is the reconstructed chronological order of the events to date for the above referenced project : November 20 , 1987 - - Submitted project preliminary layout to Ms . Scopaz . November 25 , 1987 - - Met with Ms . Scopaz to discuss Preliminary Layout previously submitted . Discussion included parking requirements and the expectation that the Planning Board would request Lead Agency. February 2 , 1988 - - Written_ comments provided by Ms . Scopaz on the November 25 , 1987 meeting . February , March , April , 1988 - - - - - Verbal disucssions on the February 2 , 1988 letter as it contained requirements directly contrary to meeting of November 25 , 1987 , such as Flood Zone and fuel storage. May 10 , 1988 - - - - Long Environmental Assessment Form ( SEQRA Application ) sub fitted to Planning Board along wi h revised Site Plan . NOTE: Environmental Conservation Law states that as early as possible the responsible agencies shall make an initial determination and within twenty (20 ) calendar days a determination of significance - (unlisted action . ) 1 May 10 , 1988 - - - - Federal Consistency Assessment Form submitted to New York State . August 1 , 1988 - - - Application submittal made to N. Y. S. , D. E.C. August 3 , 1988 - - - Variance Application with Environmental Assessment Form submitted to Zoning Board of Appeals . August 3 , 1988 - - - Application submitted to Board of- Trustees . fTrustees . September 14 , 1988 - Trustees notified Plan-ning Board that they have no objection to Planning Board assuming Lead Agency status . September 26 , 1988 - Zoning Board of Appeals notified Planning Board that they have no objection to Planning Board assuming Lead Agency status . September 26 , 1988 - Plans resubmitted . November 2 , 1988 - - Minor revisions requested by D. E. C. November 11 , 1988 - - Revisions made and forwarded to D. E. C. November 28 , 1988 - - D. E. C. Permit issued . January 17 , 1989 - - Planning Board retransmitted requirements of February 2 , 1988. ( Submittal of September 26 , 1988 and site- plan revisions of November 8 , 1988 requested by D. E. C. apparently were lost . ) February 22 , 1989 - - Planning Board again requested resubmittion of Site Plan . February 24 , 1989 - - Planning Board provided with background information and record of actions to date to facilitate their review. February 27 , 1989 - - Site plans of September 26 , 1988 and November 8, 1988 resubmitted as requested (third submittal ) . March 24 , 1989 - - - Planning Board requested revision of Site Plans in accordance with new Zoning Code. April 17 , 1989 - - - Site Plans revised and resubmitted in accordance with the new Zoning Code. 2 J May 11 , 1989 - - - - Letter from Moore & Moore to Town Attorney requesting review of the Planning Board SEQRA procedures , with specific reference to statements that the Planning Board would not proceed with SEQRA until Site Plan approval . May 15 , 1989 - - - - Planning Board issued notification of assuming Lead Agency status . 3 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 > rs TELEPHONE (516) 7651938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 1989. Merlon Wiggin P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt SCTM #1000-56-6-6.1,10.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 15, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity has made an initial determination of non-significance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ver uly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. jt � L ,3�yYfgg, w Town Hall. 53095 Main Road aha., P.O. Box 1179 g Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)7651938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17 , 198 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2 . your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM #1000-56-6-6 . 1 , 10 . 1 Requested Action: Applicant proposes to errect a 25 , 440 . sq. ft. boat storage building. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I LXXX) Unlisted Contact Person: Jill M. Thorp 516-765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16)165-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 17, 1989 Merlon Wiggin P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt SCTM #{1000-56-6-6.1,10. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, May 15, 1989. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the coordination process on this unlisted action. The Board assumes lead agency status and in that capacity has made an initial determination of non-significance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ZVer my yours, .c�c�t; % �% BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. CHAIRMAN enc. jt �' 0 Z PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 May 15 , 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board L Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Roadp Q ] Q P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Shed Application Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to the discussion that Valarie Scopez and Dick Ward had with Bill Lieblein late last week regarding the upcoming review of marina parking requirements by the Code Committee . So that subject project may proceed , Bill Lieblein has informed me that he will make available in the interim the thirty thousand (30 , 000 ) square feet of property owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . across Route 25 for additional parking . This area would have the capability of parking approximately one hundred ( 100 ) vehicles . If we can be of any further assistance , please contact either Bill or myself . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E . Wiggin , Y.O'D. ,M. E. President cc : Mr . William Lieblein Plan for Supplementary Parking Attached MEW/iw PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consult One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 APR 8 19A9 °I April 17 , 1989 SOUTHOLD TO''"JN PLANNING BOARD Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM # 1000-56-4- 10 . 1 , 11 & 13 .2 , # 1000-56-3 . 2 , . 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to your March 24 , 1989 letter . In response to requests contained in subject letter , enclosed are six (6 ) copies of the overall Site Survey ; six (6 ) copies of the overall Site at the 1 " = 20 ' scale , which also includes total site parking and parking calculations ; six (6 ) copies of the Project Site Plan for the proposed storage building ; and six ( 6 ) copies of the Project Storm Drainage Plan for the proposed boat storage building . Section 100- 191 of the Southold Code , entitled "Off-street parking areas " says that : "Reasonable and appropriate off- street parking requirements for structures and uses which do not fall within the categories listed below shall be determined by the Planning Board upon consideration of all factors entering into the parking needs of each use . " The parking schedule does include Marina , which is one ( 1 ) space per boat slip , but does not differentiate for a small boat marina , nor for boat storage sheds . The International Marina Institute has done considerable research on parking requirements for marinas as well as boat storage facilities . The Institute , based on a survey of one hundred sixty-nine ( 169 ) facilities in twenty-five (25 ) states and the Virgin Islands , determined that the highest use day was July 3rd , with the highest count occurring at mid-day , with analysis shown as follows : 0 0 0 0 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman April 17 , 1989 Page 2 o Forty percent (40% ) of the boats in use are occupied with a . 44 (without subtracting for the restaurants ) car vs . boat capacity . o The Sea Grant Marine Advisory Service to the University of Rhode Island , based on a study of two hundred eight ( 208 ) marinas , found that the Rhode Island average car count represented . 33 cars per slip on a high use day . Therefore , they recommended that the State Coastal Resource Management use 0 . 5 cars per slip as a liberal guide for marine construction permits . Please note that this was for a marina with full size boats , not for small boats as those that utilize the Port of Egypt - 0 Similarly , a 1984 Lake Erie access study of marinas in Ohio estimated that only forty percent ( 40%) of the boats in marinas were used on peak days . We , therefore , used a 0 . 5 parking space per wet slip . o Surveys also indicated that dry storage activities have significantly less parking required than for full sized boats in a marina , primarily because boats in dry storage are significantly smaller and are expected to be used by fewer people per boat . Secondly , boats in wet slips are often used as a place of relaxation and entertainment , while the dry storage boats are for on- board cruising and fishing activity . o While research is still being conducted by the Institute on dry stack storage requirements , research to date indicates that the parking space required for dry storage is approximately one-third ( 1 /3 ) of that required by a wet berth . Therefore , we have proposed to use .2 parking spaces per dry stack storage . It should also be noted that the dry stack storage building can also be used for on-grade parking when the ground floor boat is out of the storage shed . Please advise if we can supply additional supporting information on marina parking requirements . Item No . 6 in the above referenced letter was not responded to as there are no new docks being added . 0 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman April 17 , 1989 Page 3 If you have any additional questions , or if we can provide any additional information , please do not hesitate to contact this office . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . terlon E. Wiggin , D. ,M. E . President Enclosures cc : Mr . William Lieblein J 95"206 ry/86!.r25c EW YATATE 16RTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSE&ON UEC PERMIT NUMBER ECTIVE DATE 10-88-1624 0 11/28/88 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(s) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(s) Under the Environmental Conservation Law N/A 12/31/92 Article 329: Aquatic Pesticides 27 II 6NYCRR 608: l Water Quality Certification Tidalcle 25: I Wetlands Article 15, Title Article 27. Protection ofWat r SPDES 17, Titles 7, 8: Solid Waste iManageme t"' 380: le 19: Article 27, e 9; 6NYCRR Article Supply Air Title 15: cPollution Control' Hazardous Waste 3: ste Management Water WaterT TArticle ransport Title 15. Mined Land TitleArticle 23, Article Recllamation Coastal Erosion Management Articl 15, : Article 24: Article 36: Long eIsland Title WellsS Free water Wetlands Floodplain Management Article 15, Title 27: I'll—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification, Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; Wild, Scenic and Recreational C—Construct ("only), 0—Operate (*only) BNYCRR 380: Radiation Control Rivers PERMIT ISSUED TO Port of Egypt Enterprises ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE Route 25 Southold NY 11971 AGENT FOR PERMITTEE/CONTACT PERSON Merle Wiggins TELEPHONE NUMBER Peconic Assoc. P.O. Box 672 Bootlelt Alley. r 119441 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT/FACILITY(If different from Permittee) Budd's Pond and Southold Ba LOCATION OF PROJtCT/FACILITY COUNTY TOWNICITY/VILLAGE UTM COORDINATES Southold I Suffolk DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY Construct a 25,440 sq. ft. boat storage buildin • install a drainage system with containment; place 1 ,420 cubic yards of fill to raise grade for building; and place crushed stone to surface parking areas. Work to be in accordance with attached plan stamped approved by NYSDEC. GENERAL CONDITIONS By acceptance of this permit,the pvndttes stamen thal the perndt Is condr4e d upon atria complb ante with the ECL,all applicable repulatlate and time condition specified herein or attached hereto. 1. The permittee shall file In the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated M the"Wild conditions,a notice of intention o comnance work at least b hours In advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify harsher promptly M writing of the completion of the work. 2 The permitted work shall be wblect to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Connnatim which may order the work suspended R the public interest so requires pursuant to ECL§71-0301 and SADA W(3I 3 The pennat"has accepted expressly,by the institution of the application,the full legal responsibility for all damages,direct or Indirect,of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described heroin and has agreed to Mdenurlfy and save hormhas the State from W Ric actions,damages and cope of every name and descrip- tion resulting from the said project. 4. The Department reserves the right W modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after doe notice,and, R requested,hold a hearing when: a) the scope of the project,s exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinxst regulations are fond;or bl the permit was obtained by misrepresentation w failure to disclose relevant facts;or c) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued. 5 The perrsiltee s responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,Including any forms,fen or supplemental information which may be required by the Department.Io atm than 30 days(180 days for Spots or Sold or hasaralspes Wnte Management perishes)prim to the sxpbation date. b. This permit shall not be constmed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespeer upon the lands or MC94 re with the riparian rights of ocean in order to perform the permitsd work or as authorizing the Impairment of any rights,title or Interest a real M personal property herd or vesad in a person not a party to the permit 7. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals,lards,Neerpemts and ngh"o wsy which may be required for this pro)act. e. Issuanu of this permit by the Department does not unless eprnsly provided for,rnocilly,supersede or rescind an order an consent or determination by the Commissioner issued heretofore by the Department or any of the WITH,condition,M regdneMents contained In such order or determination. 9 Any nroddnuton of this permit granted bthe Deport men .1--t.1--tM writing and attached hereto. PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PERMIT MI ISTIUt R ADDRESS 11/28/88 Christine Costo oulos Bldg. 40 SUNY Rm. 219 Stony Brook, NY 117 4 AUTHJRIZED SIGNATURE Pae 1 of 3 cc: BMHP 95-206011961-35c • • • i AsODITIOWAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 1S (Tithe S1 24, 25, 34, 36 and 6 NYCRR Part 600 ) 10. That if future operations by the State of New York require an al• other environmentally de erious materials associated with the teration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized,or project if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation 14. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted it shell cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said shall he removed evenly,without leaving Imp refuse piles,ridges across waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have■ the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to a waterway. remove or alter the structural work,obstructions,or hazards caused 15. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or herein authorized. revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other 16. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the project hereby modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense pleted, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such to the State,and to such extent and in such time and manner as the extent and in such time and manner as the Deparisrtntt of Environmental Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against New York on account of any such removal or alteration. the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 17 If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way 11: That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage that the project will be free from flooding. or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused 18. If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 606,the NYS Department of Environ- by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the mental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards udder no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from airy such damage. Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 12. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi. (PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. bility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from 19. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, U.S.Coast Guard,New York State with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part Office of General Services or local government which may be required. of the permit application. 13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels. Such approved plans were prepared by Peconic Assoc. solvents,lubricants,epoxy coatings,paints,concrete,leachate or any last rev. on 11/8/88 . . SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1 . Containment capacity of drainage system must be adequate to handle runoff from a 5 year storm as shown on referenced plans. 2. Pumpout facilities must be installed and in operating condition upon completion of work with posting of signs in accordance with attached "Sample Language for Pumpout Signage" and maintenance of daily log of usage which is to be submitted to the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection by January Ist of each year. 3. All fill must be suitably contained so as to prevent is entering the waterway. Supplementary Special Conditions (A) thru (J) attached. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 10-88-1624 PROD ACIUTY NUMBER N/A Pae 2 of 3 SAMPLE LANGUAGE FOR PUMPOUT SIGNAGE IN MARINAS * The discharge of untreated vessel sewage into . the waters of the United States and New York State is prohibited by Law ( 33 USC 1322 and NYS Navigation Law 33-C, 46-2 ) . * Boat sewage from Bolding tanks shall be pumped at onshore facilities . Facilities are located at * Boats equipped w.i.tli a Coast Guard approved marine sanitation device are urged to dispose of wastes in open waters and not in enclosed bays , canals , creeks , lagoons and streams. * on-shore restrooms are located in this facility and are recommended for use before . boarding. * Let ' s keep our water clean. 4:F`.. + SUPPLEMENTARY sPECIAL CONDITIONS The following conditions apply to all permits its. :''- , `>r .•, A . TC any of the permit conditions are unclear , the permittee shall con-:��-.,it`'.,, tact the Division of RegulatoryL Affairs at the address ;and. telephone, . .:'-., :ra noted below. J . A copy of tni6 permit with supplementary conditions and approved , - plans shall be available at the project site whenever.authorized work is in progress . s C . The permit sign enclosed with the permit or a copy of letter of approval shall be protected from the weather and pose'ed'' in 'a ,con spi.cuous locar. ion -at the work site until. completion .of author.ized' work .`'. d.'; ,4 u. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the, permittee snali complete and return the top portion of the. enclooed receipt form .`_ :v .:... r• : certifying that he is fully aware of and understands all` provisions, and., conditions of this permit . Within one week of completion of .the iy permitted work , the bottom portion of that form shall 'also be com- pleted and returned . P;. rcr projects involving activities to be accomplished over 'a 'period of, `'" :.•-:'3 more than one year , the permittee shall notify the Regional Permit -''•a• .' Administrator in writing at least 48 hours prior to thik 'commencement..' . - of resumption cf work each year . °`;;,;L:;� it project design modifications take place after permit - issuance, the permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for- approval by the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertak.inq ..any such modi= _ 'r4 tications . The permittee is advised that. substantial modification May require submission of a new application for permit.:,e"' ; All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude ,contaminati6n of any wetlands or waterway by suspended .solids, sediment,I:fuels , so) vents , lubricants, epoxy coatings , paints , concrete, .leachate or ` any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the . project work . Ar.v tailure to comply precisely with all of the terms and conditions a of this permit , unless -authorized in writing, shall be ' treated as a` tJ violation of the Environmental Conservation Law. The permittee is advised to obtain any permits or approvals that'': be required from the U.S. De partment. of, Army Corpi ,of Engin.eers, , NY •: District , 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, (Attention: Regulatory _ ',r.:;.; " Cunctions Branch) , prior to commencement, of work aukhor4sed. herein, , - 'Phe granting of this .permit does not relieve the permiEtee of the responsibility of obtaining a grant,. easement, or other:.n ce ser approval from the Division of Land t)tilization,' OtticsAOt General ` - , : i'•'R:;`:yf, k, Services , Tower Building, Empire State Plaza, Al.bany,, NY':"12242, whish• °` ': ::•Ei� may be required for any encroachment upon State-owned- }ands underwstier _ r " Regional .Permit Administrator NYS Dept. '-of Environmental. Conservation ; Bldg. 40, -SUNY-Room 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794' :: ( 516) 751-7900 age { Cf3 . . K t f i t -.. .. . . ,.,, .n n';. I{,- .,J.r..'i"r Nlv t?4N7Mtyi�„s�'k,�A,s..• ..Mn...a.....i. .n..:d�•La"Kbd1�''.'$ ItW ' 1 I:A1t1.I.`; � . II.�."ill.'. • � • . ChIL! , Nof Ane Rc,,ul.ILury Svction • ::15DEC, l,ure:ni of Marinv Habitat Prc+LeCtion ?YX bldg. 40, SUNY , Room 225 SLonv Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE: Permit No. ' Y r Issued To: Contractor 's Name Contractor's Address ` • r ConLraCLur's Phone No. 1. Drar Sir: I'C-suant to General Condition Numbor I of the above referenced permit you are hereby notified that the authorized activity shall commence on This notice is tI, be sent at least two days in advance of commencement of the project. The permic sign will be posted at the site and copy of permit will be availablg . at site for inspection. Su}lmitted by •k. Failure to notify or posr sign will. leave owner and/or contractor subject to t applicable penalties for non-compliance with permit conditions. 1i ---------'----------------------------------------------------------------------sr CHARLES T. HAMILTON Chief, Marine Regulatory Section N'YSDEC, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 225 Story Brook, N. Y. 11794 RE: Permit No. Issued to Contractor's Name.' ' . r. Contractor's Address .; Contractor's Phone No. Dear Sir: Pursuant to General Condition Number 1 of the above referenced permit you are .- hereby res hereb notified that the authorized activity w&4—completed on -- y y Y. ti Submitted by a r1 This notice, with photos of completed work and or com;:leted aurvly, is to ba Oen;: :` to above address promptly upon completion of project . Failure to notify will'�'Jefv_ owner and/or contractor subject co applicable penalties for non—compliance with permit conditions. x r mOocED � Jcti � a� E y w0 ►- 0 C cts «S �, o = E sc� C -pCE v a N UZ '� > O w L .. m CM 0 C w a� o 0a> a to p Ct O C 0 CL a U 0uj cm -1 � 2CLL0 j � 0 a {ca C E = oca00E 00 z O p + •cam °: = mow T >- .. m w '1 X a p ._� 0 c 0 N N c E 0 .0 .0 y 3 t W ~ C ' ' '�_' C O C — LU Z �v ��oo zO � "I IF w � • � = as 4-0 0 � V 0oc�nc a3m CM •r = CV _. o V V E 4j, � � C � � CO 0 4IIIIIP 411111, C15 CIO cm a) .` t Q. Q.y Y C E (n N *' O '0 i O Q> cu c. E 0 E $ F— CL 4) p Q cn Z o II- E a m w i 0 / 17 P" EC k6l FRULD ► TES A`��' ► ' ,(!.�', , ., . 1 n c . 3 �s . 137016 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation RECEIPT REGION NO. I DATE 4-13-Sk LOCATION S 3_ DIVISION 7► hZ(a RECEIVEDOF kms- OF 6i3l Ti+ f.n a. prt-hdc IN THE AMOUNT OF r%Ff-, k FOR IO-%4• IuJ Tut CASH ❑ DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE OTr ru CHECK [! NUMBER TITLE �'PPk MONEY ORDER ❑ R 32-01.3 tueol ORIGINAL —L �i_ _ I -' 1 r � w�_ o V� a, . .. a. �� f 1' I � '�c1�19 .�. �` ' / J� , , � t.Y` r �/ e � l � . . � M. a � � '`� 5 !f ti t, ,�. ;., �; � � o. rr. s e I � i r 1 � S I ,� � � � 1 � / ��_; � - .. 4�. . - � e � I 3 r p ! , � �� C. � ,� F f �` � , A 1, ' r , �, � } :e r F . . - - r� z' � t /{ � .� ' � - - ♦ .Y R __ - .- e- :r � �- � -„ `. 6 2 1 ; I t: TO S Cj Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 2, 1988 Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed expansion of Port of Egypt Marina SCTM # 1000-56-6-6-1, 10.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: MP- /117L In response to our meeting of Nov."nbe:: 25, 1987, the proposed expansion was reviewed and researched. The following items should be considered before you submit the proposed application to amend the site plan: 1. A special Exception to expand a marina use must ?/ be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning Board will coordinate its review with the Zoning Board of Appeals. �rer.�r C35� >r2. A variance will be required for the front yard setback of the proposed building. atBt zg � �e3. Flood zone requirements must be addressed. Q4. Safe storage of liquid petroleum and gasoline y on-site must be addressed. t 5. Show all parking For the entire complex, e including the boat storage area on the north � t side of State Route 25 and the leased area. tD ,6. Consider approaching the State about abandonment of Old State Route 25 to improve access to the site. (see enclosed diagram. ) 7.,.,Indicate which existing buildings on-site will'be kept and which will be removed. Show location of overhead racks. 'Shed on east side of proposed building should be removed to improve vehicular access around building. lece(%ec� DEG Pe't's`"" �)D THIS INDENTUarnade the 20th day,of September ,ni�hundred and Seventy-eigh BETWEEN WILLIAM J. 4TEBLBVN, residing at 125' Sterlingtreat, Village of Greenport , Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN, residing at no number Hippedrolsh Drive, Southold, Town of Soythold,. County of Suffolk an Q State of New York, 4 party of rhe first parr, and PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISE, INC. , a domesc rcorporat, having its principal place of business at no number Maim( Road, Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and S ate of..\Nw York, party of the second put, \ r WITNESSETH, that the patty of rhe first parr, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valusW mnsidentioo pard by rite party of the second part, does hereby grant and releam unto the party of the seoW ptM the hero at succcss,+ts and assigns of the party of the second pert forever, ALL that certain phut, piece or parcel of land, with the headings and improvements thereon erected, situate, hymg and lying in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of f77U Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described ss•¢ollows: BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Old Msip Road at the northeasterly corner of land conveyed by the parties of 1'*40 the first part to the party of the second part by Deed ip 1970; from said point of beginning running along said southerly line of Old Main Road, North 87 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East, 477.45 feet to a monument ; thence along land of Becker, South 26 ��.(�(, • degrees , 47 minutes , 00 seconds .East, 409.0' feet to ordinary high -s. water mark of Budd's Pond; thence westerly to a point on- said !- ordinary high water mark which is South 78 degrees, 03 minutes, 10 seconds West, 514. 71 feet from the last described point; thence along said land conveyed by the parties of the first part; to the party of the second part , five courses: ' (1) North 12 de-4reas, 38 minutes , 00 seconds West, 226.0 feet to a monument; tbenee (2) North 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds East, 12.0 feet; thence (3) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds West, 35.0 feet ; thence (4) South 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds West, 12.0 feet ; thence (5) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds West , 220. 58 feet to the point of BEGINNING, h It is intended that this conveyance include all of the area between the two side lines of the above described premisale. ti This is a d ed which corrects the description of the above parcel set forth i; a deed dated March 16, 1972 and recorded in _Liber of ( Deeds 8467 at naoP � ci RECORDED M N i}w^ 77 Oct 31 2 az Pm #78 ' ARTHUR J.FELICE N K �cLERK OF F+ R ^� SUFfOLA COUNTY OD FFot'rc 0 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 22, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10. 1 , 11&13 . 2 1000-56-3.2,3.3,4&6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned proposal at their last work session and had the following comments. The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17 , 1989 and February 2 , 1988. Of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown, including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses. All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. Please contact the office if you have any problems with the above. .(yc�tl� BENNEZT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN enc. cc: William Lieblein 0 • PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax (516)477-0198 February 27 , 1989 �F91 -15-7111 Southold Town Planning Board 7 � �1 Southold Town Hall Main Road SJL1IF U�IJJ:sy Southold , L . I . i PLANNING BUNKO New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Building Applicant : Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM # 1000-56-4- 10 . 1 , 11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-3 . 2 , 3 . 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 So as to facilitate your review, as outlined in your letter of February 22 , 1989 (copy attached ) and its response (copy attached ) , documents for subject project previously submitted on September 26 , 1988 are resubmitted . Your expeditious action will be greatly appreciated . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIAATE�S, INC . Merlon E. Wiggin , P M. E. President Attachments cc : Mr . William Lieblein MEW/iw PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consult One BoosleyAlley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 16) 77-0030 Faxx (516)477-0101 98 APR 18 1989 April 17 , 1989 9 SO07HOLD resvra j PLANNING 80"RD t Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P. 0. Box 1179 Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM # 1000-56-4- 10. 1 , 11 & 13 .2 , # 1000-56-3 . 2 , . 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to your March 24 , 1989 letter . In response to requests contained in subject letter , enclosed are six ( 6 ) copies of the overall Site Survey ; six (6 ) copies of the overall Site at the 1 " = 20 " scale , which also includes total site parking and parking calculations ; six (6 ) copies of the Project Site Plan for the proposed storage building ; and six ( 6 ) copies of the Project Storm Drainage Plan for the proposed boat storage building . Section 100- 191 of the Southold Code , entitled "Off-street parking areas " says that : "Reasonable and appropriate off- street parking requirements for structures and uses which do not fall within the categories listed below 'shall be determined by the Planning Board upon consideration of all factors entering into the parking needs of each use . " .," narking s hed " lp dnoc ; nclude Marina which -a—zooee ( 1 ) space per boat S11D . h""t dnas �t ata fnr a sma ina marina , nor for boat storage sheds . The International Marina Institute has done considerable research on parking requirements for marinas as well as boat storage facilities . The Institute , based on a survey of one hundred sixty-nine ( 169 ) facilities in twenty-five (25 ) states and the Virgin Islands , determined that the highest use day was July 3rd , with the highest count occurring at mid-day , with analysis shown as follows : Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman April 17 , 1989 Page 3 If you have any additional questions , or if we can provide any additional information , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Perlon E. Wiggin , D. , M. E. President Enclosures cc : Mr. William Lieblein PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(5 16)477-0198 February 24 , 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Nall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Building Dear Mr. Orlowski : Reference is made to your letter of February 22 , 1989 which included the following comments . ( The original is yet to be received - Fax copy was received at 11 : 12 AM on February 24th . ) 1 . "The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17, 1989 and February 2 , 1988. " 2 . "Of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown , including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses . " 3 . "All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer . " To assist in a logical efficient review of the proposed project the following is the background information and record of action to date : 1 . The January 17 , 1989, dated January 17, 1988, transmitted a copy of the February 2 , 1988 review. Copy attached . 2 . In preparation of a pre-application meeting with Ms . Scopaz a project preliminary layout was sent on November 20 , 1987. ( Copy of transmittal letter attached . ) • s Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 2 3 . A meeting was held to discuss the preliminary plan on November 25 , 1987 with Ms . Scopaz, Vic Lessard, and Bill Lieblein and the writer in attendance. ( See memo for the record attached. ) Included in the discussion at this meeting was the overall parking and that the property to the North of Route 25 is only partly owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises ( 300 feet ) , and included in this portion is the leaching field for Armando ' s Restaurant . The other three ( 3 ) Owners of the property are separate from Port of Egypt Enterprises , and this proposed project . It was specifically understood at this meeting that the site and parking plan would be for the Port of Egypt Enterprises property to the South of Route 25. A deed for this property was provided. ( Copy attached . ) Based on the above , we were requested to utilize in the overall planning the previous approved ( December 20, 1979 ) overall site parking plan . (Copy provided by Ms. Scopaz . ) Copy of the Planning Board approval dated November 13 , 1980 is attached . 4 . Review requirements requested February 2 , 1988 (copy attached ) . As some of the requirements were in conflict with discussions previously held - such as flood zone and petroleum products storage (previously approved the Planning Board and in place) a second preliminary plan was prepared and hand carried on approximately May 18, 1988. Subsequent comments were received from D .E .C . on drainage and a request to specifically identify all parking spaces for each use. ( This was done by coding each space - "R" for restaurant , "M" for existing marina and boat storage, and "S" for existing fishing station parking to be converted to new storage building parking . Six (6 ) copies of stamped plans were submitted on September 25, 1988. 5 . January 17 , 1989 (dated 1988) again transmitting the requirements of February 2 , 1988 which , in our opinion , had already been complied with . Telephone call revealed that the submitted drawings of September 26 , 1988 could not be found and that was the reason for the re-request of the requirements of February 2, 1988. Additional drawing sets were immediately hand carried, including the revision of November 8 , 1988 for D.E. C. Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 3 6 . From additional phone calls it was learned that a One Hundred Dollar ($100.00) fee was owed as well as a site application form (new requirement ) and that no further review action could take place until both were received . Both were hand carried to the Planning Board on January 27 , 1989. Copy attached . 7 . The letter of January 17, 1989 (dated 1988 ) also stated , "The Planning Board will proceed with the SEQRA process as soon as a completed application is submitted" . As early as November of 1987 , query was made in regard to the Planning Board requesting Lead Agency . See Memo for the record. To precipitate this decision and to initiate the SEQRA process , application forms and Full Environmental Assessment forms were sent to the Planning Board on May 10th , 1988. On the same date forms and applications were sent to D. E. C. , Town Trustees , and Town Z. B.A Boards , and New York Department of State Coastal Zone Management Program. ( Copies attached . ) The Department of State has completed their review and found the project to be consistant with the States C . M. P. The D. E. C . completed their review and issued a Permit on November 28, 1988 based on plans submitted. Both the Trustees and the Z.B.A. acknowledged on September 14 , 1988 and September 26 , 1988 respectively that the Planning Board was to request Lead Agency status and that they had no objection . The Trustees also had indicated that the classification was "Unlisted" . ( Copies attached . ) Both the Trustees and the Z . B . A. have repeatedly stated that they could not proceed on their application until the Planning Board initiates the SEQRA process by declaration of Lead Agency and doing a determination of significance. The State Environmental Conservation Law indicates that the agency receiving the application is to initiate action within twenty (20 ) calendar days . (Application was filed May 10 , 1988) . To our knowledge, to date neither a declaration of Lead Agency or the significance of the proposed action has been accomplished by the Planning Board . • Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 4 As the Board knows , the boating and marina businesses are seasonal dependant , and as such requires advance planning for any chanyes such as the project proposed . The applicant is very willing to respond with any reasonable request the the Planning Board might have. What is not understood is the repeated requests for the same item over and over, such as "Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses " without ever being able to find out why the segregated parking plan submitted five ( 5 ) months ago is not satisfactory . It is also not understood why the SEQRA Process cannot be executed . if there is a problem with the initiation of same by the applicant on May 10th , 1988, we are not aware of it . We understand that the Board is short of staff and has an unusually heavy workload and appreciate same . It is felt , however , that the applicant has been more than patient and has a right to expect a more expeditious and organized process of the request for the proposed action . To assist the Board in proceeding on the proposed project , enclosed is another set of all plans , with application form , property survey with deed for same , and the SEQRA environmental form . After receipt would you please advise of any additional information required . The applicant also appreciates the opportunity to address the Board on the evening of February 27th . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , Pi?-,M- E. President cc : Mr . Francis J . Murphy - Supervisor Mr. William Lieblein MEW/iw March 2, 1988 To Whom It May Concern : This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act In my behalf In making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina ( Port of Egypt Enterprises ) for William Lieblein, located on Route 25 (Main Road) , Southold , New York . AUTHORIZED BY: NAME: DATE: i Fgb, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Ln � •. fiA P.O. Box 1179 L Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD January 17, 1988 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1,11&13. 2 1000-56-3 . 2, 3. 3,4&6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: To confirm conversations bgtween your office and Jill Thorp of this office, the✓site plan application and eapplication fee must be submitted before the Planning Board can continue review of the above. The following items must be included, in addition to the items from the previous correspondence from the Planning Board dated February 2 , 1988. 1. The plans must be signed and stamped by a licensed surveyor. 2. The entire �. ""'n fa^'. property must be shown on the map 3. Parking must be shown for the entire complex. 1 rvs�a.eA %04 The Planning Board will proceed with the SEAR process as f,G soon as a completed application is submitted. MZ/i -^ Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning the above. / very truly yours, G BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN CC, Bill Lieblein enc. Feb. 2, 1988 corr. r - Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman April 17, 1989 Page 2 o Forty percent (40%) of the boats in use are occupied with a . 44 (without subtracting for the restaurants ) car vs . boat capacity . o The Sea Grant Marine Advisory Service to the University of Rhode Island , based on a study of two hundred eight (208) marinas , found that the Rhode Island average car count represented . 33 cars per slip on a high use day . Therefore , they recommended that the State Coastal Resource Management use 0. 5 cars per slip as a liberal guide for marine construction permits . Please note that this was for a marina with full size boats , not for small boats as those that utilize the Port of Egypt . o Similarly , a 1984 Lake Erie access study of marinas in Ohio estimated that only forty percent ( 40%) of the boats in marinas were used on peak days . We , therefore , used a 0 . 5 parking space per wet slip . o Surveys also indicated that dry storage activities have significantly less parking required than for full sized boats in a marina , primarily because boats in dry storage are significantly smaller and are expected to be used by fewer people per boat . Secondly , boats in wet slips are often used as a place of relaxation and entertainment , while the dry storage boats are for on- board cruising and fishing activity . o While research is still being conducted by the Institute on dry stack storage requirements , research to date indicates that the parking space required for dry storage is approximately one-third ( 1 /3 ) of that required by a wet berth . Therefore , we have proposed to use . 2 parking spaces per dry stack storage. It should also be noted that the dry stack storage building can also be used for on-grade parking when the ground floor boat is out of the storage shed. Please ad.vise if we can supply additional supporting information on marina parking requirements . Item No . 6 in the above referenced letter was not responded to as there are no new docks being added . P TQ' r{� tSQtf -c D SGT• Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 2, 1988 Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed expansion of Port of Egypt Marina SCTM # 1000-56-6-6-1, 10.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: *P= In response to our meeting of Nov.ambe_: f5, 1987, the proposed expansion was reviewed and researched. The following items should be considered before you submit the proposed application to amend the site plan: 1. A special Exception to expand a marina use must be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals. • The Planning Board will coordinate its review with the Zoning Board of Appeals. \ p/2. A variance will be required for the front yard -�'v k C... ) ' setback of the proposed building. 4i&_ 2ZS7) ?r3. Flood zone requirements must be addressed. ' ?.4. Safe storage of liquid petroleum and gasoline Q on-site must be addressed. on 5. Show all parking for the entire complex, "Vwp+ including the boat storage area on the north side of State Route 25 and the leased area. -XV 6. Consider approaching the State about abandonment of Old State Route 25 to improve access to the site. (see enclosed diagram. ) 7.,,,2ndicate which existing buildings on-site will'be kept and which will be removed. Show location of overhead racks. 'Shed on east side of proposed building should be removed to improve vehicular access around building. L THIS INDENTUSmade the 20th day chi September ,ni'hundred sod seventy-eigh ft�lti` . BETWEEN WILLIAM J. 4TEBLFSIN, residing at 125' Sterlingtreat, Village of Greenport , Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN, residing at no number Hippedroo. Drive, Southold, Town of Soythold, County of Suffolk an State of New York, hwrty of ripe first part, and PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISE, INC. , a domes> c �corporat. having its principal place of business at no number Mair{ Road, Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and 8Cyate 0 ow York, N party of the second parr, �\ r WITNESSETH, +hat the party of die first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other Valuable eomidesuim paid by ripe party of the second part, don hereby grant and releste unto the party of the Kcmd pert, the heir cc soe(e•scors and assigns of the party of the second pat forever, II ALL that certain plur, piece or parcel of larnd, with the buildings and improverttents therm erected, shute, Ispopf: aril being in the Hamlet of Arehamomaque, Town of Southold, County of �� Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as'gEollows: BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Old Maip Road at the northeasterly corner of land conveyed by the parties of 1/14Y00 the first part to the party of the second part by Deed ip 1970; from said point of beginning running along said southerly line of .p_• Old Main Road, North 87 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East, 477.45 feet to a monument ; thence along land of Becker, South 26 degrees , 47 minutes , 00 seconds .East, 409.0- feet to ordi'mary high water mark of Budd' s Pond; thence westerly to a point on-said = -- ordinary high water mark which is South 78 degrees, 03 minutes, LO seconds West, 514. 71 feet from the last described poAt; thence Vail along said land conveyed by the parties of the first pdr to the party of the second part , five courses: ' (1) North 12 de4rees, 38 minutes , 00 seconds West, 226.0 feet to a monument; Cuenca {2) North 64 degrees , 55 minutes, 00 seconds East, 12.0 feet; thence (3) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds Weat,' 35.0 feet ; thence (4) South 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds West, 12.0 feet ; thence (5) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds West , 220. 58 feet to the point of BEGINNING. I It is intended that this conveyance include all of the area between the two side linea of the above described pramisds, -+ Thisis a d ed which corrects the description of the above parcel ( set forth 9;i a deed dated March 16, 1972 and recorded in -.Liber of Deeds 8467 at naeP 1st RECORDED S Mj 1 - - Oct 31 2 42 PN '18 ARTHUR J.FELICE 9 �GLERK OF R '� SUFFOLg COUNTY OD BUB8O1L INVESTIGATION• SOIL MECHANICS o ® OLLLOGO(P 99NUE6 �Ca 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L.I., NEW YORK 11783 (5161 221-2333 I 4� f i i i VDENSE ACTI RELATED TO SPOON BLOW ER FOOT AND SILT 8 CLAY IS OR LESS SOFT 10 OR LESS 16 TO 39 MEDIUM I I TO 29 40 OR MORE HARD 30 OR MORE TANDARD PENETRATIONTEST(2"SPOON,1401bHAMMER,30"FALLSPOON BLOW COUNT IS GENERALLY SHOWN IN 6"INCREMENTS FOR 2'DRIVE TO OBTAIN BLOWS PER FOOT(NIUSE THE 2ND 6 3RD 6"INCREMENT ROTARY CASING EXTRA HEAVY CASING SAMPLE SPOON SIZES. INCHES 2.0 HAMMER WEIGHT, POUNDS 140 HAMMER FALL, INCHES 30 C8 - CASING BLOWS PER I FOOT DRIVE UD - UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLE SS - SPOON BLOWS PER 6 INCH DRIVE NO- SAMPLE NUMBER P - PUSHED BY WEIGHT OF HAMMER FEET - DEPTH FROM GNO.SUR.NOTED AT EACH S' THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED WITH THE SPECIFIC UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SOLE LIABILITY OF SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.,ITS ENGINEERS AND EMPLOYEES,FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNTOF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS REPORT.THE USE OF THIS REPORT WILL CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE BY THE CLIENTOF THIS DISCLAIMER.THE FEE CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT IS PREDICATED UPON THIS LIMITATION OFLIASILITY WHICH IS THE ESSENCE OF THIS AGREEMENT.IF THESE TERMS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE,CLIENT MUST NOTIFY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.IN WRITING BY CERTIFIED MAIL,RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED,WITHIN FIVES)DAYS.SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.,ITS ENGINEERS AND EMPLOYEES DONOTACCEPT ANY LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONS OTHER THAN THE CLIENT FOR WHOM THIS WORK WAS DIRECTLY PREPARED AND ANY SUCH PERSON,FIRM OR CORPORATION RELIES ON THIS REPORT AT HIS OWN RISK. NOTES Soil descriptions are by visual examination of soil samples recovered during drilling operations. Soil descriptions are in accord with the Unified Soil Classification system. Ground water was measured inside the drill casing at the completion of each borehole. SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. subsoil investigations 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, NEW YORK 11783 316 221 - 2333 40 D 4 D SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION SOUTHOLD, N. Y. cQ VERTICAL BORING SCALE: DRAWING DATE DRAWING NUMBER i DATES OF BORINGS REVISED. 8956863 9-28-89 SHEET OF UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFIC ION SOIL GROUPS TYPICAL NAMES AND SOIL SYMBOLS GW WELL GRADED GRAVELS,GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES,LITTLE OR NO FINES a o' GP POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES,LITTLE OR NO FINES �•o•; GM SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND- SILT MIXTURE _ GC CLAYEY GRAVELS , GRAVEL -SAND-CLAY MIXTURE 4 o :o 0 0 0 SW WELL GRADED SANDS,GRAVELLY SANDS,LITTLE OR NO FINES a 0 0 SP POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS,LITTLEOR NO FINES • • • S M SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES o 0 0 0 0 0 0 SC CLAYEY SANDS,SANO-CLAY MIXTURES o 0 o. o ML INORGANIC SILTS,VERY FINE SANDS,CLAYEY SILTS,SLIGHT PLASTICITY C L INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTIC ITY,GRAVELLY CLAYS SANDY CLAYS, SILTY CLAYS 0 L ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY ; 111 I M H INORGANIC SILTS,MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS,ELASTIC SILTS CH INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY,ORGANIC SILTS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES,N.Y.C. BLDG.CODE C26 -1103 CLASS OF ALLOWABLE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BEARING TONS/SO.FT. I - 65 HARD SOUND ROCK 60 2 - 65 MEDIUM HARD ROCK 40 3 - 65 INTERMEDIATE ROCK 20 4 - 65 SOFT ROCK 6 5 - 65 HARDPAN — 6- 12 6 - 65 GRAVEL AND GRAVEL SOILS(SOIL GROUPS GW,GP,GM BGC AND-- 4 - 10 GROUPS SW,SP BSM CONTAINING MORE THAN 10% GRAVEL) 7 - 65 SANDS(OTHER THAN FINE SANDS)(SOIL GROUPS SW,SPBSM 3- 6 BUT CONTAINING NOT MORE THAN 10% GRAVEL) 8 - 65 FINE SAND 2 - 4 9 - 65 CLAYS AND CLAY SOILS (SOIL GROUPS SC,CL B CH) HARD (5MAX) MEDIUM (2MAX) 10- 65 SOFT BY TEST SILTS AND SILT SOILS(SOIL GROUPS ML 8 MH) DENSE 3 MEDIUM 1 .5 II - 65 LOOSE BY TEST NOMINALLY UNSATISFACTORY BEARING MATERIALS BY TEST 0L - MAIN STING 0 A TAURANT F.F.NOTED AS eM ON SITE PLAN ASSUMED AT EL 100.00: EXISTING OFFICE —�— 0 I B12 EXISTING B-3 SHED I 29•± f Y � I U I IESHED I O PROPOSED BOAT STORAGE 2 I BUILDING 1 I p 59't w ul 1 CONC. BULKHEAD EXISTING RESTAURANT BORING LOCATION PLAN SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. sU bsoll Investigations 3770 RIERRICk ROAD • SlAV020- NtW YORK 11733 - 21* 221-2333 Qoe PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES P OSE- BO A T STORAG BUIL awlURFACE NV STIGATION SOUTIIOLD NEW YORK mAA vssne,�sal,us sunt: sss+rs e.a: wrw W.Mm NTS C7 R 9 989 BgS68c3 osTw a sowws: ttwsss, W SEPTEMBER 8 989 *"err I or I SOIL M&CHANICS 9)RO MRO (99)RF6 SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L. 1., NEW YORK 11783 08 LOCATION SOUTHOLD GROUND WATER OBSERVATION DATE TIME OEPTN ATE: BORING - RILLER: SPECTOR: NGINEER: SURFACE rPE RIG: ELEVATION ' EPTN BLOWS PERE CASING E Low SAMPLE ON SAMPLER BLOWS DESCRIPTION SYMBOL REMARKS RFACE NUMBER 0-6 6 -12 1 PER FT. 0 Sand , Silt, Gravel (Fill) (11-65) Brown Peat 317 16 (PT) (11-65) 9 9 13 1 12 Grey/White Sand Q in Trace Peat 10 (SP) (11-65) Grey/Brown Silt Trace Sand (ML) (11-65) 15 END 10 ' 20 23 30 35 40 SOIL NOCHANICS 9)UM V 9(O0E3[�DLI SUBSOIL INVESTIGATION$ 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, L. I.. NEW YORK 11783 08 LOCATION: SOUTHOLD GROUND WATER OBSERVATION - DATE TIME DEPTH ATE: 9/28189 BORING # 2 - - RILLER: NSPECTOR: NGINEER: SURFACE YPE RIG: ELEVATION ' EPTH SAMPLE BLOWS PERE C4SING ELOw NUMBER ON SAMPLER BLOWS DESCRIPTION SYMBOL REMARKS RFACE 0-6 6 -12 PER FT. 0 10 6 12 10 Sand , Silt, Gravel, 1 2 Brick, Roots (Fill) (11-65) S 9 17 2- 21 1 81 7 9 10 10 END 10' IS 20 2s 30 35 40 SOIL MOCHANICS D�GL MR* (990Gb SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11783 OB LOCATION: SOUTHOLD GROUND WATER OBSERVATION GATE TIME DEPTH ATE: 9/28/89 BORING ' 3 5 '2" RILLER: N SPECTOR: NGINEER: SURFACE YPE RIG: ELEVATION ' EPTN SAMPLE BLOWS PERE CASING ELOW NUMBER ON SAMPLER OLD S DESCRIPTION SYMBOL REMARKS RFACE 0.1 6 -12 PER FT. 0 Sand , Silt, Gravel , (Fill) (11-65) 55 7 Grey/Brown Silt 6 9 Trace Sand , Trace Organics 2 4 (OL) (11-65) 2 4 8 10 Grey/Brown Silt Trace Sand (ML) (10-65) 10 12 15 Brown Sand.Trace Silt Trace Gravel (SP) (8-65) 20 END 14 ' 25 30 35 40 NIA Article 15, Title 3; 6NYCRR 327, 328, 329: Aquatic Pesticides ° are, Article 15, Title 5: A is `17. ic�.�. Protection of Water O ArylCle 17, TIINs SPDES , Article 15, Title 15: Article 19: Water Supply Air Pollution Control' L •+r Article 15, Title 15: Article 23, Title 27: ten Water Transport Mined Land Reclamation Coast 34 Coastal Erosion YanapertEeeE Article 15, Title 15: Article 24: Article 36: Long Island Wells Freshwater Wetlands Floodplain Management Article 15, Title 27: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification, Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37; Wild, Scenic and Recreational C—Construct ('only), 0—Operate ('only) II 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control Rivers PERMIT ISSUED TO Port of Egypt Enterprises ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE Route 25 Southold NY 11971 AGENT FOR PERMITTEEICONTACT PERSON Merle Wiggins TELEPHONE NUMBER Peconic Assoc. P.O. Box 672 Bootleit Alley. Greenport. NY 11944 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROHCTIFACILITY(If different from Permutes) Budd's Pond and Southold Ba LOCATION Of PROILCTIFACILITV COUNTY TOWN/CITY/VILLAGE UTM COORDINATES Southold Suffolk Southold DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY Construct a 25,440 sq. ft. boat storage building; install a drainage system with containment; place 1 ,420 cubic yards of fill to raise grade for building; and place crushed stone to surface parking areae. Work to be in accordance with attached plan stamped approved by NYSDEC. GENERAL CONDITIONS By acceptance of this permit,the pertnitles agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compll- ance with the ECL,all applicable regulations and the conditions specified herein or attached hereto. 1 The permittee shall file in the office of the appfoprute regional permit administrator,or other office designated In the special conditions,a notice of intention tocommence work at least 40 hours m advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify h,ml6er promptly In writing of the completion of the work 2 Thepermitnd work shall be subject to mspectvan by an authorized reproentativs al the Departmental Environmental Conservation which may Order thework suspended if the public interest so requires pursuant to ECL 171-0101 and SAPA 1140111). 1 The permittee has accepted expressly,by the execution of theappllcatlon.the full legal responsibility for all damages,direct or Inched.of whatever nature,aed by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to Indemnity and serve harmless the Stas from wits,aclsens,damages and cwu of every name and d&Kriw Ivan resulting from the said project. 4 The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice,and, If requested.hold a hearing when. a) the scope of the project is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found;or b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts;or c) navly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was Issued. 5 The pear is responsible for keeping the permit active by wbmlltlny•renewal applkalvan.Including any lorms,lees ar supplemental information which may be required by the Department,no later than 10 days(160 days for SPDLS or Solid or Haaarduws Waste Management permits)prior to the expiration dale. 6 This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to traipses upon the lands or Interfere with the riparian rights of others In order to perform the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any fights,title at Interest In real or personal property held or vested In a person not a party to the permit 7 The permittee Is responsible lot obtaining any other permits, approvals. lands.easements and lighuafway which may be rrequired for this project. B Issuance of this permit by the Department does not,unless expressly provided for,modify.supersede or raicind an order on consent or determination by the Commissioner issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms, conditions,w requirement,contained In such order or determination. 9 Any modification of this permit granted by the Department rgwt M n writing and attached hereto. PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PERMIT MI ISTRA itADDRESS ill/28/88 Christine Costo oulos Bldg. 40 SUNY Rm. 219 Stony Brook, NY 11794 AUTF PRIZED SIGNATURE I �n..•1 t/vy�.t, � Page 1 of 3 cc: BMHP resources of.he State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to M,a�"�--� -�• ..- ... - remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused a w [ 15. There Shen rw unreaaoneble�r,un.r...,, thereby without expense to the Stale, and the expiration or herein authorized. revocation of this permit. the structure. excavation, or other 16. If upon the expiration or r0aoon o' ,., modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- p p perm u, l e protect hereby authorized has not been cc ted,the apu l,Cant s'sal: without expense pleted, the owners, shall, without expense to the State. and to such to the State, and to such extent and i, ,.,ch irme a,d manner as the extent and to such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Department of Environmental Conserveoon may r±qL ire remove all or Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable any portion of the uncompleted strut tie or till and restore the site to its former condition. No clam sha.i ie made ag.inv the Mute of and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against New York on account of any such re,n).:at or a tei au•-n the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 17 If granted under Article 36, this permit •lues no' s,.�nry in any way 11 That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage that the project will be tree from flooc,n2 or injury to the structure of work herein authorized which may be caused 18If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 608. the n.YS De"rt Tient of t nviron- by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the mental Conservation hereby certifies rhai the sutlec project will not conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and contravene effluent limitations or other hnueauons o standards under no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Sections 301. 302. 303, 306 and 307 of d e Clear N site, Act o: 1977 12. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi- (PL 95217)provided that all of the concotions l,ste, herein are met. bility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from 19 All activities authorized by this permit mist be,r strict conformance the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S.Coast Guard,Naw York State with the approved plans submitted by the apphcart o hes agenr as part Office of General Services or local government which maybe required. of the permit application. 13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination PeCor..c As:;oc. of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, Such approved plans were prepared by solvents,lubricants.epoxy coatings,paints,concrete,leachate or any last rev. _ on SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1 . Containment capacity of drainage system must be adequate to Lhandle rurolf d 'kx , , Dl r rt 2. Pumpout facilities must be installed and in operating condition upon completion of work with posting of signs in accordance with attached "Sample Languaige for Pumpout Signage" and maintenance of daily log of usage which is tc be submitted to the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection by January Ist of each year. 3. All fill must be suitably contained so as to prevent is enterin> the aaterwtty. Supplementary Special Conditions (A) thru (J) attached. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 10-88-1624 PROGRAWFACILITY NLMBER N/A Page of 3 EC i " t. `1UVLQ �rVr If R LF /s.20 TME ► TES Inc . s '.�n°".r aa�N,aw�o s06 la-Cr. M*W.AW l(WrW04.P., oft: � w .nnnf� Y V. 11Aaa I s. .3 RfA1. FSTA?fLLT�.M J. "B "IN �' OCj 3 11178 ITRAWSH t TiAX /HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN JAMES A.SCHONDEBARE L Town Hall, 5n3095 Main Road TOWN ArrORNEY �O Q.Q. Box 1179 �! Southold, New York 11971 ROBERT H.BERNTSSONQ� TELEPHONE ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY 1.516)765-1939 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEYKNNIIRNIG TOWN OF SOUTHOLD12MINTER-OFFICE MEMOTkODTQWN BOARD FROM THE TOWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO: Valerie Scopaz, Planning Board FROM: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney DATE: April 11, 1989 RE: SEQRA Process Val: I received an inquire on the SEQRA process reference Port of Egypt. Could you please give me an update. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road s�tl, •.,-, r,� P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 24, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates P.O.Box 672 Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM #1000-56-4-10 . 1, 11 & 13 . 2, #1000-56-3 . 2, . 3 . ,4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin, The Planning Board reviewed the above-referenced plans. All pending site plan applications must be reviewed for compliance under the new Zoning Code. Therefore, the following information must be shown on revised site plans before the Planning Board can proceed with your application. 1. The new zone of the property is Marine Business II . 2. The new Code allows one use per each 80,000 square feet of land above the mean high water mark. Existing uses should be listed on the site plan along with the total land area. 3 . Parking on site must be located within the property boundary lines, unless written confirmation of permission to use New York State Dept. of Transportation property is submitted. . A copy of the proposed site plan and this letter will be sent to the New York State Department of Transportation for their comments. Parking for proposed use must be in accordance with the new code. Indicate the storage capacity of the proposed building for comparison with parking calculations. 4 . Required yard setbacks must be in accordance with the new code. However, Section 230 allows for a front yard setback in keeping with an average setback of all buildings within 300 feet of the proposed building. If this section is used, indicate setbacks on site plan of such buildings. 5. Landscaping must be in accordance with the new code. The items listed below are included as an example. a. Section 100-212 requires 20% landscaping, one shade tree for every 40 feet of new frontage being developed , a 15 foot landscaped strip contiguous to the front lot line, a 5 foot strip of landscaping contiguous to the front of the building. b. Section 214 requires interior landscaping, which it does not appear that you will be able to comply with, given the nature of the development. Perhaps this deficiency can be offset by increasing landscaping at the front or around the former fishing station building. 6. New docks are being added. Indicate projected capacity and incorporate into the parking calculations. 7 . Include dimensions of building on site plan. 8 . Drainage calculations do not appear to be sufficient to handle runoff from a 5 year storm (2 inches) . Upon receipt of the revised site plans, which are to be signed and sealed, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. V ruly Yours Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Frank J. Kujawski, Jr. , Board• of Trustees James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Building Department William Lieblien, Owner Town Hall, 53095 Main Road CA P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY 1 FAX(516)765-1823 TOWN CLERK TFLEPHONE(516) 765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 9, 1989 To: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney From: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Re: Port of Egypt Marine 8 Cedarfields/Mooresland Today 1 received a telephone call from Merlon Wiggin who is representing William Lieblein before Planning Board with respect to construction of a boat storage building. Mr. Wiggin advised that the necessary forms with respect to the SEQRA process were filed with the Planning Board on May 10, 1988, the Planning Board has to date failed to begin the SEQRA process. He said Mr. Lieblein is very upset and considering hiring an attorney to take action in this matter. (Around noon today Mr. Wiggin came to the office and handed me the attached copy of a letter to the Planning Board dated February 24, 1989 which he said contained background information and record of action to date. With respect to the project, applications must be made to the Trustees and Board of Appeals, but they advised him they cannot act until the Plan- ning Board initiates the SEQRA process.) When me Wiggin came to the office he also handed me the attached letter relative to Cedarfields/Mooresland which is before the Planning Board and stalled in the SEQRA process. He asks that this matter be investigated as well. PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)4770030 Fax(516)477-0198 February 24 , 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman FFEB71989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall SuuriiaToG;...i Main Road NNINGBUARU Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Building Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to your letter of February 22 , 1989 which included the following comments. ( The original is yet to be received - Fax copy was received at 11 : 12 AM on February 24th . ) 1 . "The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17 , 1989 and February 2 , 1988. " 2 . "Of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown, including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses . " 3 . "All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. " To assist in a logical efficient review of the proposed project the following is the background information and record of action to date: 1 . The January 17 , 1989, dated January 17 , 1988, transmitted a copy of the February 2 , 1988 review. Copy attached . 2. In preparation of a pre-application meeting with Ms . Scopaz a project pr*4iWt~y 1�y out was sent on aw N *tea 2Ql AJ+ (Copy of tsnsmittal letter attached. ) �. 0 • - ! Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24, 1989 Page 2 3. A meeting was held to discuss the preliminary plan on .illi mith .fie. Sc.4FOz, Vic Lass,ard , and Bill Lieblein and the writer in attendante.` ( See memo for the record attached . ) Included in the discussion at this meeting was the overall parking and that the property to the North of Route 25 is only partly owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises (300 feet ) , and included in this portion is the leaching field for Armando' s Restaurant . The other three ( 3) Owners of the property are separate from Port of Egypt Enterprises , and this proposed project. It was specifically understood at this meeting that the site and parking plan would be for the Port of Egypt Enterprises property to the South of Route 25. A deed for this property was provided. (Copy attached . ) Based on the above , we were requested to utilize in the overall planning the previous approved (December 20, 1979 ) overall site parking plan. (Copy provided by Ms. Scopaz . ) Copy of the Planning Board approval dated November 13 , 1980 is attached. 4 . Rexiex ragaireme.ats reque*ted Febrorr 2,, 19* (copy attached ) . As some of the requirements were in conflict with discussions previously held - such as flood zone and petroleum products storage (previously approved the Planning Board and in place) a second preliminary plan was prepared and hand carried on apordxiAutely Ray18, 19§#. Subsequent comments were received from D. E. C. on rainage and a request to specifically identify all parking spaces for each use. ( This was done by coding each space - "R" for restaurant , "M" for existing marina and boat storage, and "S" for existing fishing station parking to be converted to new storage building parking . Six (6) copies of stamped plans were submitted on::. S*9Z**W a6, f�B6. 5 . January 17, 1989 (dated 1988) again transmitting the requirements of February 2 , 1988 which , in our opinion, had already been complied with. Telephone call revealed that the submitted drawings of September 26 , 1988 could not be found and that was the reason for the re-request of the requirements of February 2 , 1988. Additional drawing sets were immediately hand carried, including the revision of fve"er S. 1988 for D.F.C . Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24, 1989 Page 3 6. From additional phone calls it was learned that a One Hundred Dollar (:100.00) fee was owed as well as a site application form (new requirement ) and that no further review action could take place until both were received. Both were hand carried to the Planning Board on January 27, 194Q. Copy attached . 7 . The letter of January 17, 1989 (dated 1988 ) also stated , "The Planning Board will proceed with the SEQRA process as soon as a completed application is submitted" . As early as November of 1987 , query was made in regard to the Planning Board requesting Lead Agency . See Memo for the record . To precipitate this decision and to initiate the SEQRA process , application forms andEnv.ir90mental Assessment f.orais Frere sent to the Pla�9 '90at"d"'r W*W*y-+ t°h; 't*$. On the same data forms and applications were sent to D. E. C. , Town Trustees , and Town Z.B.A Boards , and New York Department of State Coastal Zone Management Program. (Copies attached. ) The Department of State has cptppleted their review and found the project to be co-hsistant with the States C .M.P. The P.E.C. co and issued a Permit on November 28. based on bmitted: Both the Trustees and the Z.B .A. acknowledged on Sapte ber ...14., 19", and IS" respectively that the Planning hoard, ra re ue€# Lead Agency status and that they had no objection . The Trustees also had indicated that the classification was "Unlisted" . ( Copies attached . ) Both the Trustees and the Z . B.A. have repeatedly stated that they could not proceed on their application until the Planning Board initiates the SEQRA process by declaration of Lead Agency and doing a determination of significance. T StateEerironmeeta:l Conservation Law .indicates that theWAWve Ing he ap llcation 1s Es initiate acnty les44r days. ( 1lcation wa , 1988 To our knowledge, to 'datt neither a declaration f Lead Agency or the significance of the proposed action has been accomplished by the Planning Board. Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 4 As the Board knows , the boating and marina businesses are seasonal dependant , and as such requires advance planning for any changes such as the project proposed . The applicant is very willing to respond with any reasonable request the the Planning Board might have. What is not understood is the repeated requests for the same item over and over, such as "Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses" without ever being able to find out why the segregated parking plan submitted five ( 5 ) months ago is not satisfactory . It is also not understood why the SEQRA Process cannot be executed . If there is a problem with the initiation of same by the applicant on May 10th , 1988, we are not aware of it . We understand that the Board is short of staff and has an unusually heavy workload and appreciate same. It is felt , however , that the applicant has been more than patient and has a right to expect a more expeditious and organized process of the request for the proposed action . To assist the Board in proceeding on the proposed project , enclosed is another set of all plans , with application form, property survey with deed for same , and the SEQRA environmental form. After receipt would you please advise of any additional information required . The applicant also appreciates the opportunity to address the Board on the evening of February 27th . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , P�E. President cc : Mr . Francis J . Murphy - Supervisor Mr . William Lieblein MEW/ iw PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One BoorkyAlley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (316)477-ODM Fax(5 16)477-0198 March 1 , 1989 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland SCTM * 1000-40-5- 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement When the letter of February 27, 1989 requesting status of the suggestion that all of the documents be rebound was hand delivered to the Planning Board (copy attached ), I was advised that the Planning Board still had not yet made a decision as to whether the D. E. I .S. and its Supplements were complete, and that the Board was still waiting to hear an answer of the two (2) letters of February 17 to Dave Emilita (copies attached) . We assume that these letters were the result of the discussion the Board had at the February 16th work session at which John Costello was present , and he was advised that the Board still needed to determine if the last Supplement addressed the optional site layout ( 100 units ). I have called Dave Emilita and have read him the two letters and he is of the initial opinion that they should not have an impact on the completion of the D.E. I . S. , however, when he gets back to his office on Friday, he indicated that he will contact both your office and mine as to his recommendation on same. These delays raise concern that perhaps the SEQRA process is not being properly followed and could adversely impact this affordable housing project. For review and clarification purposes , I have enclosed a copy of our letter of October 14th , 1988, which depicted the chronological actions regarding the SEQRA Process up until the end of October of 1988. Since October of 1988, and at the suggestion of Dave Emilita , we further revised the D. E. I . S. in its Supplement to include the optional revised plan of one hundred ( 100) units in addition to the original one hundred sixty-eight ( 168) proposed , and the resultant change in sewage treatment from on-site to sewer to septic tanks and leaching pools. 5 Southold Town Planning Board March 1 , 1989 Page 2 As requested , the optional projected calculated ground water Impact from fertilizer and nitrates and on-site septic systems was accomplished and submitted to you o , i�th our andwstanding that this wool fte a �dV s -rte for this pirU4a44i-*;f. 1.$. It is our understanding that , as Lead Agency , you have a requirement to determine within thirty 30) days of receipt of this last document whether it is satisfactory with respect to its scope content and adequacy. As your Planning Consultant. Dave Emil,ita, has advised you as of January 14th that he considers complete (copies attathed) we do not understand why two weeks after 'the completion of the proJea4ed thirty (40 "d Ost1 t 1 '4" going to your Planning Consultant requesting information on details that we think should be more appropriately discussed and included in the site plan review. Because of the economic hardships that are being created and being borne by the Applicant , could you please advise us as to what is the next SEQRA step that you will be taking. If we can be of any further assistance in the completion of the SEQRA process , please do not hesitate to advise us accordingly . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. erlon E . Wiggi�nl, WZM.E. President cc : Mr . John Costello w/Attachments Mr. Donald Bracken w/Attachments Mr. David Emilita w/Attachments Mr. James McMahon w/Attachments Peter S. Danowski , Jr. , Esq. w/Attachments Charles Lockrow Division of Regulatory Affairs , NYSDEC w/Attachments AA. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS S41 a January 1Q, 2989 =E82 Mr. Bennett Orlovski Jr. , Chairman Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall $3095 main Road Southold, NY 11971 r Re: Cedarfields/Mooresland Dear Mr. Orlowski, We received a report regarding the quality of groundwater recharged within the sone of concentration of the well proposed for the above captioned development. We have reviewed saw and find the report to satisfy the informational requitementa, in out opinion, for the Gels for this project. Taken together with the original DEIOk., 4 April 240 19170 the supplement to t1p MM.# dew 4_+ame 25, r j d tbts tho 66co 1d Supplement dit 34A �, t#e Lbrire documents constitute, again n our opinion, a draft OVIS acceptable for review. We would advise the applicant that the three eYistinj documents be bound as one document with a new cover and contain a cover letter explaining the documentary history of the DHis. Please advise if you agree with this course of action. We ale available if you or youc staff have UW questions. Sincerely, SS&PATOWS(tI ASSOCIATBS, INC. 0levid J. bmilita, AICA Principal Planner DJSe/mt 23 N.t.r.X,lnKtt Ave. )umlStown W 02835 (401) 413.0430 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(5 16)4774198 October 14, 1988 Southold Town Planning Boated Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Cedarfields Affordable Housing Project and Mooresland Town House Project. In an attempt to bring the SEQRA Process for this project to a logical conclusion , especially as it represents an Affordable Housing Project , enclosed is a list of chronological events , actions taken , and the resultant responses which hopefully will result in the conclusions of the required actions. 1 . April 24, 1987 D. E. I .S. Submitted . 2. June 26, IN7 - At the request of the Planning and David Emilita, a Supplement to the D. E. I . S. containing groundwater impact (Nitrates) , drainage calculations, and peak hour traffic study. 3. July 1#0 1987 , - Resolution by the Southold Town Planning Board accepting both the D.E. I . S. and the Supplement as complete and accurate for review (copy attached) . 4. July 29, 1987 � - Submittal of planning consultants review of July 8, 1987 . 5. kugust 7, 19W - Response to planning consultants review comments. No record of acceptance of same. 6. August 10, 1967 - Public .b*ar4ng on LAe 1i.E..I.S. Jhe Planning hoard minutes of this date reflect that there were rW-A" %en c9meets received on . t1tw.. D. I.S. , and tt'he onYi cotmeent requiring action is from Dave Emilita , which is "There is still no calculated evidence that the well will work, and I would like the Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 2 record to so state that the subject is still not sufficiently treated for the purpose of SEQRA. We have not taken a hard look as to why this well will work . " 7. August 21 , 1987 - Record of meeting with Sidney Bowne on August 19th in regard to the methodology and calculation of drainage requirements for the project (copy attached) . Verbal approval was given by Sidney Bowne that this was a very acceptable method of determining drainage requirements , with the possible question as to the need to perform on-site soils tests to determin the permeability coefficient. B. August 25, 1987 - Action by Southold Town Planning Board approving the Preliminary Map for the sub-division subject to : 1 ) adequate response to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (D. E. I . S. ) in regard to potable water; 2 ) provision of adequate storm drainage and roadway in accordance with the Town of Southold Highway Standards ; 3 ) provision for sidewalks ; 4) approval from the Town' s Consulting Engineer (copy attached) . 9. August 31 , 1987 - Letter to the Planning Board from Peconic Associates requesting clarification and assistance as to what was required in regard to potable water, and request for clarification on the use of drainage swales versus curbs and leaching basins and acceptance of drainage calculation methodology. No record of a response (copy attached) . tjj. Oc.tabor S. 1.1187 - Request from the Planning Board to Donald Bracken- to request a sixty (60) day extension for the Planning Board to prepare a Final Environmental Impact Statement (copy Southold Town Planning Board October 14 , 1988 Page 3 attached) . Have no record that this request was ever received. It was also about this time that the developer requested a delay in doing the perculation tests , primarily, I understand , because of the uncertainty of having both water and sewer available from the village of Greenport. 11 . Between the above and the following , the major acitivity of concern was trying to get a resolvement and a committment as to the availability of water and sewer for subject project. 12. Ley 17, 1M,, - Request to the Planning Board for verification that the SEQRA Process was complete based an previous responses (copy attached) . Ko record of a reply. 13. July 13. 1"S - Action by the Southold Town Planning Board to have Dave Emilita review the Supplement to the D.E. I . S. dated June 25, 1988. This is a typo, as the Supplement was dated June 25, 1987 and previously, by a resolution by-' Tie Board on July 16, 1987, resolved that Dave Emilita to determine that both the O.E. I .S. and the Supplement were complete. 14. JWy 130 1"80 - In anticipation of the above, met with representatives of the Planning Board to review items necessary to complete the O. E. I . S. Items discussed include the following : a . Zone of influence for the proposed well . It was indicated that this was not complete as it did not cover all of the areas within the zone. The- zone of influence calculations have been revised and a copy enclosed as an attachment. Southold Town Planning Board October 14, 1988 Page 4 b. . Question about the acceptance of the on-site well . Reported to the Planning Board the N2M engineering report on the proposed well number 10 (well on the Costello property) dated June 1987, which concluded that the test results indicated that the well had a capacity of 250 G.P.M. , and recommended its acceptance by the Village of Greenport for additional potable water supply. As and added note, application for the well has been made to D. E.C. . Also, this project is within the Village of Greenport ' s water franchise area. c . There was a considerable amount of discussion in regard to the pavement widths and the requirements for sidewalks. John Costello was requested to provide some supportive type data on what other affordable housing projects did for road widths and sidewalks. The same was submitted on September 1 , 1988. Copy of the transmittal letter is attached. No record of a response. 15. August 1988 - The decision was made by John Costello to go ahead and have the soil permeability tests done. These were completed and the results were received on September 7 , 1988, a copy of which is enclosed. The borings were taken in six (6) locations which represent the location of the inground drainage leaching systems. All sites , except two (2 ) indicated that the permeability rate was in excess of that used in the draft calculation of August 21 , 1987. Permeability at the 8- 1 and 8-2 sites Southold Town Planning Board October 14, 1988 Page 5 was2 X 10-3 centimetefs per second, Instead of the 1 X 10- used in the calculations . Based on the above the leaching pools at these two (2) sites are being changed from four (4) feet deep to eight (8) feet deep and being surrounded by a backfill of graded stone. The above modifications at these two (2) locations will result in added adequate drainage capability with a safety factor in excess of 1 .4. 16. October 1988 - As a response had not been received on pavement widths and sidewalks. John Costello went ahead and suggested a revision to the Site Plan showing sidewalks on one ( 1 ) side and on certain roads in the Cedarfields area . These sidewalks will be three (3) feet wide and located adjacent to the pavement between the pavement header curb and the swail . Plan views and typical sections are enclosed. Hopefully , the above recapulation and the enclosed documents will complete the SEgRA process on this urgently needed affordable housing project. If you have any further questions , or if I can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. erlon E. Wig , Ph.D. .M.E. President Enclosures : As per text. cc : Mr. John Costello MEW/iw 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Supervisor, Frank Murphy FROM. Valerie Scopaz , Town Planner RE: Port of Egypt Site Plan Application DATE: March 6, 1989 As per your request, please find the bulk of the correspondence from the Planning Board' s site plan file on the Port of Egypt proposal. If there are any questions, do not hesitate to call . A c� APR - g q9A SOUTHOLDTOWN STATE OF NEW YORK PLANNING BOARD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. I17as MICHAEL J. CUDDY FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER D a t e To Case Number: Location: Dear Sir: Site plans for the above noted project have been received by this office . Your project has been assigned the case number indicated above . Any inquiries as to your project must be refered to by case number . The review process by this department requires at least ten to fifteeen working days depending on project size . Therefore , we request that you allow this time prior to making any inquiries as to the status of your project . Sincerely your , Vito F. Lena Regional Permit Engineer � ` t ' Ga_r _D a . C FORM NO.a • ` TOWN OF SOUTI[OLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERICS OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Fite No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date . . . S . . . . . .. 1978 . . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that yo(ur{ap�plication dated . ��+-C!u��. .aS. . . . . . .. 19Y 8. . icer t•cntit to construct . . x'. . .15 !!-!� . • , . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . at Location of Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . �A-il .>-4�. . . . . .V!1a�n� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nnu:cNv. Srrcerro•r rtµ q /" County T.ix ,Nfap No. 1000 Section . .d. S. Le . . . . . . Block . . . .O.ta . . . . . . . Lot 3•?6. .Va. .4Y.(D,! Subdivi,ion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Afap No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds .C".aar I1� `!^^• /d D ^ B O u-,. �a� µ�Zti.Q9..� Sz.c,�c,,.� 97- )3. w.�Qa.•,.4 �a...,-o . Q.c�i.�-,•. ,t.:a� �.�,,�� 9-�, 'moi�,,,.,-�,� ; �..c3 .a. � �.�-,,.w...:, �s�..d • J/� iQ .v'.c.,K . . . . . . . . . . . . Building Inspector fill i,ao ;yv q Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 1 1971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 24, 1989 Vito F. Lena Civil Engineer Traffic & Safety Group Permit Department, Region 10 N.Y.S. Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11788 RE: Proposed site plan for Port of Egypt Southold, SCTM # 1000-56-6-4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Lena, The Planning Board would appreciate your review of the above-referenced site plan, particularly with regard to the applicant' s proposal to use part of the New York State right-of-way for parking purposes. The Board is concerned with traffic safety at this site. Also, does the State have any plans to abandon a portion of this right-of-way? Thank you for your time and consideration. Very Truly Yours, r t}nett` c7rlows"' k�,- •J'r. �; " � Chairman v VS Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 ti; '•q� > r' Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE l (516) 7b5-193B PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 24, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates P.O.Box 672 Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM #1000-56-4-10. 1 , 11 & 13.2, #1000-56-3 . 2, . 3. , 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin, The Planning Board reviewed the above-referenced plans. All pending site plan applications must be reviewed for compliance under the new Zoning Code. Therefore, the following information must be shown on revised site plans before the Planning Board can proceed with your application. 1. The new zone of the property is Marine Business II . 2 . The new Code allows one use per each 80,000 square feet of land above the mean high water mark. Existing uses should be listed on the site plan along with the total land area. 3 . Parking on site must be located within the property boundary lines, unless written confirmation of permission to use New York State Dept. of Transportation property is submitted. A copy of the proposed site plan and this letter will be sent to the New York State Department of Transportation for their comments. Parking for proposed use must be in accordance with the new code. Indicate the storage capacity of the proposed building for comparison with parking calculations. { 4. Required yard setbacks must be in accordance with the new code. However, Section 230 allows for a front yard setback in keeping with an average setback of all buildings within 300 feet of the proposed building. If this section is used, indicate setbacks on site plan of such buildings. 5. Landscaping must be in accordance with the new code. The items listed below are included as an example. a. Section 100-212 requires 20% landscaping, one shade tree for every 40 feet of new frontage being developed , a 15 foot landscaped strip contiguous to the front lot line, a 5 foot strip of landscaping contiguous to the front of the building. b. Section 214 requires interior landscaping, which it does not appear that you will be able to comply with, given the nature of the development. Perhaps this deficiency can be offset by increasing landscaping at the front or around the former fishing station building. 6. New docks are being added. Indicate projected capacity and incorporate into the parking calculations. 7 . Include dimensions of building on site plan. 8. Drainage calculations do not appear to be sufficient to handle runoff from a 5 year storm (2 inches ) . Upon receipt of the revised site plans, which are to be signed and sealed, the Planning Board will proceed with its review. V ruly Yours f Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Frank J. Kujawski, Jr. , Board of Trustees James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Victor Lessard, Building Department William Lieblien, Owner PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 February 27 , 1989 FPf rr L5 'jiSouthold Town Planning Board 71M Southold Town Hall L., Main Road BBI Southold , L. I . lv-- - New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Buildinr Applicant : Port of Egypt Enterprises SCTM # 1000-56-4- 10. 1 , 11 & 13 .2 1000-56-3 .2 , 3. 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 So as to facilitate your review, as outlined in your letter of February 22 , 1989 (copy attached ) and its response (copy attached ) , documents for subject project previously submitted on September 26, 1988 are resubmitted . Your expeditious action will be greatly appreciated . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIAATEES,, INC. Merlon E. Wiggin , P ,M. E. President Attachments cc : Mr. William Lieblein MEWliw ��g�FFQ(Kl' 0 Town Hail. 53095 Main Road O P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) '/65 1936 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 22, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1, 11&13.2 1000-56-3.2,3.3 ,4&6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned proposal at their last work session and had the following comments. The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17 , 1989 and February 2, 1988. Of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown, including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses. All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. Please contact the office if you have any problems with the above. ery tryly o ,Gr(/+tl� ccYY BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN enc. cc: William Lieblein PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One BootleyAley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 February 24 , 1989 Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Marine Boat Storage Building Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to your letter of February 22 , 1989 which included the following comments . ( The original is yet to be received - Fax copy was received at 11 : 12 AM on February 24th . ) 1 . "The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17 , 1989 and February 2 , 1988. " 2 . "of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown , including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses . " 3 . "All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. " To assist in a logical efficient review of the proposed project the following is the background information and record of action to date : 1 . The January 17 , 1989, dated January 17 , 1988, transmitted a copy of the February 2 , 1988 review. Copy attached . 2 . In preparation of a pre-application meeting with Ms . Scopaz a project preliminary layout was sent on November 20 , 1987. (Copy of transmittal letter attached . ) Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 2 3 . A meeting was held to discuss the preliminary plan on November 25 , 1987 with Ms. Scopaz, Vic Lessard , and Bill Lieblein and the writer in attendance. ( See memo for the record attached . ) Included in the discussion at this meeting was the overall parking and that the property to the North of Route 25 is only partly owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises (300 feet ) , and included in this portion is the leaching field for Armando' s Restaurant . The other three (3 ) Owners of the property are separate from Port of Egypt Enterprises , and this proposed project . It was specifically understood at this meeting that the site and parking plan would be for the Port of Egypt Enterprises property to the South of Route 25. A deed for this property was provided . ( Copy attached . ) Based on the above , we were requested to utilize in the overall planning the previous approved (December 20, 1979 ) overall site parking plan. ( Copy provided by Ms. Scopaz . ) Copy of the Planning Board approval dated November 13 , 1980 is attached . 4 . Review requirements requested February 2 , 1988 (copy attached ) . As some of the requirements were in conflict with discussions previously held - such as flood zone and petroleum products storage (previously approved the Planning Board and in place) a second preliminary plan was prepared and hand carried on approximately May 18, 1988. Subsequent comments were received from D.E.C . on drainage and a request to specifically identify all parking spaces for each use. ( This was done by coding each space - "R" for restaurant , "M" for existing marina and boat storage, and "S" for existing fishing station parking to be converted to new storage building parking . Six (6) copies of stamped plans were submitted on September 26 , 1988. 5 . January 17 , 1989 (dated 1988) again transmitting the requirements of February 2 , 1988 which , in our opinion , had already been complied with . Telephone call revealed that the submitted drawings of September 26, 1988 could not be found and that was the reason for the re-request of the requirements of February 2 , 1988. Additional drawing sets were immediately hand carried, including the revision of November 8 , 1988 for D.E. C. Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 3 6 . From additional phone calls it was learned that a One Hundred Dollar ( $100.00) fee was owed as well as a site application form (new requirement) and that no further review action could take place until both were received . Both were hand carried to the Planning Board on January 27 , 1989. Copy attached . 7 . The letter of January 17, 1989 (dated 1988) also stated , "The Planning Board will proceed with the SEQRA process as soon as a completed application is submitted" . As early as November of 1987, query was made in regard to the Planning Board requesting Lead Agency . See Memo for the record . To precipitate this decision and to initiate the SEQRA process , application forms and Full Environmental Assessment forms were sent to the Planning Board on May 10th , 1988. On the same date forms and applications were sent to D. E. C . , Town Trustees , and Town Z .B.A Boards , and New York Department of State Coastal Zone Management Program. ( Copies attached . ) The Department of State has completed their review and found the project to be consistant with the States C .M. P. The D. E . C . completed their review and issued a Permit on November 28, 1988 based on plans submitted. Both the Trustees and the Z . B.A. acknowledged on September 14 , 1988 and September 26 , 1988 respectively that the Planning Board was to request Lead Agency status and that they had no objection . The Trustees also had indicated that the classification was "Unlisted" . ( Copies attached . ) Both the Trustees and the Z. B .A. have repeatedly stated that they could not proceed on their application until the Planning Board initiates the SEQRA process by declaration of Lead Agency and doing a determination of significance. The State Environmental Conservation Law indicates that the agency receiving the application is to initiate action within twenty (20 ) calendar days . (Application was filed May 10 , 1988) . To our knowledge , to date neither a declaration of Lead Agency or the significance of the proposed action has been accomplished by the Planning Board. Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman February 24 , 1989 Page 4 As the Board knows , the boating and marina businesses are seasonal dependant , and as such requires advance planning for any changes such as the project proposed . The applicant is very willing to respond with any reasonable request the the Planning Board might have . What is not understood is the repeated requests for the same item over and over , such as "Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses " without ever being able to find out why the segregated parking plan submitted five ( 5 ) months ago is not satisfactory . It is also not understood why the SEQRA Process cannot be executed . If there is a problem with the initiation of same by the applicant on May 10th , 1988, we are not aware of it . We understand that the Board is short of staff and has an unusually heavy workload and appreciate same. It is felt , however , that the applicant has been more than patient and has a right to expect a more expeditious and organized process of the request for the proposed action . To assist the Board in proceeding on the proposed project , enclosed is another set of all plans , with application form, property survey with deed for same , and the SEQRA environmental form . After receipt would you please advise of any additional information required . The applicant also appreciates the opportunity to address the Board on the evening of February 27th . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ��D M- Merlon E. Wiggin , P . ,ME. President cc : Mr. Francis J . Murphy - Supervisor Mr . William Lieblein MEW/iw P :r TO SL 1 Basdold,N.Y. 11971 1 (518)788.1936 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Applicationg/26/88 Filing Fee Date Recd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Exten— 'of Existing Use I Revision of an ApprovedeMte Plan (Date of Approval • . . Specify xxxxxxxxx:xxxxxxxx Name of Business or Site Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . - Location of Site Route 25 , Sournoic Address of Site, if available ou a ou o Name of Applicant Port of EqXDt Ln er rises , Inc . Address of Applicant Route Z5 , Southold , Telephone - Person to be responsible for Construction William Lieblein Telephone765-2445 Applicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Under contract to purchase Owner of- Fee Title to Land Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . Address to 25 Southold Telephone - Site Plans Prepared byPeConic soCiates, nc. License No. u - - Address One Bootleg Alley, Greenport N.Y. Telephone 4 xx:xxxxxxxx:xxxxxxxxx Total Land Area of Site 94476 Sq.Ft. Zone DistrictC-Light Industri Existing Use of Site marina Proposed Use of Site marina Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure s) 6015 total sgft. sgft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structures) 5440 al—sgft. sgft• Percent of Lot coverage by Buildings) � • Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) 24 . 5% ( b4 2arK . a % Percent of Lot for Landscapinq(where applicab e t Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. 6 . 0 ft . (building other Has applicant been granted a vas ance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals NO Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suf?oTZ Count, Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site?NO (see note below) If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVA: OF SITE PLAN BY THE. PLANNING BOARD. NOTE : Permits obtained for fuel storage on adjacent site (approval date 4/2/86) • APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Elisa. Thomas being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Brigantine rive , Southold in the State of New York, and that a is the .owner of the above propel or that he is the ° t-6e G a.rof the pt Enterprises,(Title (Specify whether Partnersh Port of Egy : �il4ich is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XII3 of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by -the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed .in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed � (owner) Sworn to before me this day o tc(_19y (No JAL o ' Signed •(-�- (Partner or Corporate officer and Title) lir March 2 , 1988 To Whom It May Concern : This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina ( Port of Egypt Enterprises ) for William 4ieblein, located on Route 25 (Main Road) , Southold , New York. AUTHORIZED BY: NAME: DATE: // XZP$ ca) Flo TH191NDEN E the 20th day of September ,n��+ h� seventy-eight fr&it BETWEEN WILLIAM J. LTEBL81N, residing at 125' Sterlingtrent, Village of Greenport , Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York and HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN, residing at no numb*r Hippodrome Drive, Southold, Town of Soythold,. County of Suffolk an I State of New York, party of the first part, and PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISE, INC. , a domesr#c rcorporatia having its principal place of business at no number Naiq Road, Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and Siteof fs. York, party of dK second put, \ r WITNESSETH, that the party of the first parr, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other vabubk aotuiderasioa paid by dee parry of the second part, dm hereby grant and release unto the party of she second pjrt, she befn at 7 I successors and assigns of the party of the srcond pts forever. ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, with she Iwildings and improvements therms erected, sitmte, lying and being in the Hamlet of Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, -County of 1YD Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described aa•¢ollows: BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Old Hain Road at the northeasterly corner of land conveyed by the parties of ,11Jy40 the first part to the party of the second part by Deed 1p 1970; / from said point of beginning running along said southerly line of 101d Main Road, North 87 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East, 477.45 feet to a monument; thence along land of Becker, •South 26 �9 U� degrees, 47 minutes, 00 seconds East, 409.0- feet to ordinary high -�. water mark of Budd's Pond; thence westerly to a point on- said =- ordinary high water mark which is South 78 degrees, 03 minutes, /y, 10 seconds West, 514. 71 feet from the last described poitlt; thence Z7.o along said land conveyed by the parties of the first pdry to the party of the second part , five courses: ' (1) North 12 de4ress, 38 minutes, 00 seconds West, 226.0 feet to a monument; t4enee (2) North 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds East, 12.0 feet; thence (3) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds Weat, 35.0 feet; thence (4) South 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds West, 12,0 feet ; thence (5) North 25 degrees , 05 minutes, 00 •*condo West , 220. 58 feet to the point of BEGINNING, l It is intended that this conveyance include all of the area between the two side lines of the above described promiaols. ti This -is a defed which corrects the daiscrint-4nn ..F amu- A RECORDEO — N Oct 31 2 4 = I c A A$TNUR J.FELICE �' x SUF OL RK OF COUNTY Go • � � ' - - _ 9BQ1 T - �,,, Page 2 February 2, 1988 8. All parking spaces must be 10' by 20' with 20' off back up space. 9. Indicate landscaping. The site plan should be drawn at a scale of 1" to 20' to facilitate review. If there should be any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely yours, Valerie Scopaz Town Planner Enclosure cc: William Lieblein Port of Egypt Enterprises Route 25, Southold �f FOL, W S Lt Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 2, 1988 Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed expansion of Port of Egypc Marina SCTM G 1000-56-6-6-1, 10.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: In response to our meeting of Nov.amba:: 25, 1987, the proposed expansion was reviewed and researched. The following items should be considered before you submit the proposed application to amend the site plan: 1. A special Exception to expand a marina use must be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning Board will coordinate its review with the Zoning Board of Appeals. 2. A variance will be required for the front yard setback of the proposed building. 3. Flood zone requirements must be addressed. 4. Safe storage of liquid petroleum and gasoline on-site must be addressed. 5. Show all parking for the entire complex, including the boat storage area on the north side of State Route 25 and the leased area. 6. Consider approaching the State about abandonment of Old State Route 25 to improve access to the site. (see enclosed diagram.) 7. Indicate which existing buildings on-site will'be kept and which will be removed. Show location of overhead racks. Shed on east side of proposed - building should be removed to improve vehicular access around building. New York State Deportment of Environmental Conservation Am Regulatory Afrairs Unit 01111111110 Bldg. 4G, SUNT , Rm. 219 NOW Stony Brook, NY : 1794 Thomas C Jorllnp (516) I51-'90i, DEG - T CommBslorw i November 28, 1988 Port of Egypt Enterprise# t Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Re: 10-88-1624 Lear Sir: �n conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures '. 'Article -0, EGL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) aIe arc enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. If art jnablE to comply with any conditions , please contact us at the „I,o.c addre>s . Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted .ii the project. site and protected from the weather . Very truly yours, Robert N. Thurber Senior Environmental Analyst encInsure } ry • � i ERS524 PACE32 f / rt IITATR OP NTMI rK CWHYT```0/��9,,, ,"•/4">� u: FTATI 09/NEW YORK.COUNTY W On the g7 Fj day d�l {N9/tq 197 ,before toe On the /tom doy of /J/�fJ� G�t9 7�.before me pertottaff�y�ya�me �L , � fxnottaUy n `��� i��vUl� to me known to be i ividml desuibed in usd who to me known to be the individual deaNi�i{edd d Wthat ho eRecu�d the fore nstrument, nd acknowledged that ezecute� the fae�tang ittutumetu P.C�/ c•Rentt mne. �Jtl�'1O"je� tfle Same. ERIC G. MCI' NOTARY PUBLIC. Slalt 01 Naw Matt ERIC G. aM% No. 5 .2162100 NOTARY PUBLICSlat* of New TAR QwUTwd in Sullolk County /� No. Si7 2167100 Tam rapvn MaKh 30. IV Quahl,ed to Sullolk COUM e TNt Eapi,es Much 30. 1977 STATS Of NRW YORK.COUNTY OF ut STA"OF NRW YORK,COUNTY Or at On the day of 19 . before me On the day of 19 before me cam tokto nienown, who, being by ate duly mom did depae and the subscribingwittier w the foregoing instruttpot, with whom Say that he resides at No. I am soqu mtM who. being by we duly sworn, did depm and Say that he resides at No. that he is the of d . the that he knows wrpontiandescribedm be the iodividlrl in acrd which easanad the foreping instrument: that he knows the sal of said aerporatlon.. that the sad affixed to said draibad in and who executed the foregoing fhattuteenr that inutrummt is saeb eerposass sal: that it was Sao sdlaed by order he.Said subscribing winters,was present and saw of rhe bond of diteRon of aid corporation, 'a id that he a=cute the Satne; and that he..said. wittier, at the .sae signed h nam therein by like order. time rabsuibed b mute out wittier thereto., 1 ' J • . r BARGAIN AND'SALE DEED FICTION 05600 _ WITH COVRNANT AGAINST GRANTORS ACTS aWCR 0600 'inxNo. tort 005000/006000 WILLIAM J. LIEBLEIN and aor7rrry ort towN Suffolk, HERMAN K. LIESLEIN . • Recordtd at Request of COMMONWEALTH LAND TO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. awn" Sar a"Sao-•�`-�--�� Schwartz & Resh, P.C. II fret soar a New"M soAao amu rr.swinras 150 Broadway New York, New York 10038 COMMONWEALTH LAND zip Na TITLE INAAANCE COMPANY i °Q AlNnoo vi- 309 jns 0n3d r anKuy i 030l+OJ3b .V~., j w Town Hall. 53095 :blain Road P.O. Box 1179k-y/J/ '. .s.,�o7 , Southold. New York 1 1971 TELEPHDNE (516)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 22, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1,11&13.2 1000-56-3.2,3 .3 , 4&6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board reviewed the above mentioned proposal at their last work session and had the following comments. The maps submitted do not fulfill that which was asked for by the Planning Board in the previous correspondence dated January 17, 1989 and February 2, 1988. Of major concern to the Board is that the entire property be shown, including all parking for the entire complex. Parking should be clearly segregated for the different uses. All plans submitted to the Planning Board must be signed and sealed by a licensed surveyor or engineer. Please contact the office if you have any problems with the above. ery tr ly ow s{ .�/f'VZ'Y` BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. CHAIRMAN enc. cc: William Lieblein .• c,��F�I1rC Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 DypY 0�' Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD 9 January 17, 1988 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1,11&13. 2 1000-56-3 .2, 3 . 3,4&6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: To confirm conversations between your office and Jill Thorp of this office, the site plan application and application fee must be submitted before the Planning Board can continue review of the above. The following items must be included, in addition to the items from the previous correspondence from the Planning Board dated February 2, 1988. 1 . The plans must be signed and stamped by a licensed surveyor. 2. The entire property must be shown on the map. 3 . Parking must be shown for the entire complex. The Planning Board will proceed with the SEQR process as soon as a completed application is submitted. Please contact this office if you have any questions concerning the above. Very truly yours; BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. CHAIRMAN CC: Bill Lieblein enc. Feb. 2, 1988 corr. Opposition Reduces Marina Expallion SOUTHDLD—A resident's re- "You have to prove this before pealed complaints over the Port of [the Appeals Board] gives you a Egypt's plans to build a new boat variance;' Flynn said. "I told the storage building has spurred the [boards that variances are to be own!r to scale down the plan to rarely granted, and that they are avoid further confrontation. giving them out like popcorn" Pert of Egypt owner William Liebiein's plans to construct a Misunderstood Plan 27,125-square-foot boat storage Lieblein said that Flynn's facility came under fire last fall calculations are based on an er- from Frank Flynn, who lives east roneous assumption that includes of the marina complex,located op- an adjacent parcel that houses a posit, Budds Pond. At four motel. He said that Flynn had separate hearings before the Town made his estimates for parking and Appeals Board,Flynn argued that lot-size coverage including the ad- the board cannot legally grant a joining acreage,which is"not part needed lot coverage variance be- of the proposal." cause Misting itructures on the pro- The 4.9-acre marina property is i perty "already exceed the 30 per- owned by Port of Egypt and the ad- cent allowed" under the code jacent motel parcel is owned by Flynn also maintains that the C&L Realty, of which, Lieblein plan does not provide for sufficient said, he is a part owner. parking spaces and will create a "The motel property was never ,. traffic hazard by allowing for an part of this plan," he said. "They additional parking area across the are two different things" road from the marina on Route 25. As proposed, Lieblein said, the "They would be transporting storage building would be.78 per- boats across a state highway...in- cent over the 30 percent lot coverage corporating the highway into the allowance. But after the last hear- marina's operations;' said Flynn. ing three weeks ago, Lieblein said "To So this legally, he would he decided to "reduce the size of need another three-and-a-half acres the building"to avoid the need for of land;' he continued. If the Ap- a variance on the lot coverage and peals Board grants the request, setback from the front yard. Flynn said, "They would be mak- ing a gift to him of three-and-a-half Smaller Building z acres of land:' Lieblein said he plans to take 13 feet off the length of the building, Prove Hardship which would bring it down from By law. Flynn said, the Appeals 217 by 120 feet to 204 by 120 feet. Board also cannot grant the The only other special permits from variance on lot size and setbacks the Appeals Board that he said he unless the applicant proves that would need would be for the struc- without approval he would suffer ture's distance to the water, and economic hardship. _ . _ Continued on Page 9 Marina _,." Expansion Continued from Page 2 location from the side yard. ` As for the parking area opposite Route 25,he said that the 300-foot by 100-toot lot had been set aside at the request of the Town Planning Board in order to meet the code re- quirement of one parking space per boat,which applies to boats in the water and in storage as well. "The Planning Board has said they are satisfied,"Leiblein said,ad- ding that Lhe additional parking lot would be used only "on three or four peak weekends a year." The hearing will continue at the Appeals Board, but no date has been set.Meanwhile,he said,he has retained an attorney to deal with the ka,e if necessarv. ALL SITE PLAN ELEMENTS ARE TO BE ON A SURVEY AT A SCALE OF a" 20' AND STAKED AND SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, OR ARCHITECT. SITE PLAN ELEMENTS 100-134 Town Code (�) Lot, block, and section number, if any, or the property taken 43 from tax records ( ) Name and address of the owner of record ( -) Name and address of the person preparing the map (� ) Date. North arrow and written and graphic scale9' ( �) Sufficient description or information to precisely define the boundaries of the property. All distances shall be in feet and tenths of a foot. All angles shall be given to the nearest ten seconds or closer. The error of closure shall not exceed on in ten thousand. (�) The locations, name. and existing width of adjacent streets and S curblines (/F The location and owners of all adjoining lands, as shown on the S latest tax records ( ) Location, width and purpose of all existing and proposed easements, setback reservations, and areas dedicated to public use within or adjoining property. ( ) A complete outline of existing deed restrictions or covenants �:- applying to the property Existing Zoning S t ( �) Existing contours at intervals of fi4 or less, referred to a datum .G satisfactory to the Board ( ) Approximate boundaries of any areae subject to flooding or stormwater V r ( ) Location of existing watercourses, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops isolated trees with a diameter of eight inches or measured three feet f above the base of the trunk and other significant existing features. ( �) Location of uses and outlines of structures, drawn to scale on and within one hundred (100) feet of the lots. 5 ( /) Paved areas, sidewalks. and vehicular access between the site and public streets. ( �) Locations, dimensions, grades and flow direction of existing sewers,, culve and waterlines as well as other underground and above ground utilities within and adjacent to the property. 40 Site plan elements cont. (100-134) ( .) Other existing development. including fences, landscaping and screening ( r) The location of proposed buildings or structural improvement ( -1 The location and design of all uses not requiring structures such as off street parking and loading areas. (� The location, direction, power and time of use of any proposed outdoor lighting or public address systems. (�) The location of. and plans for, any outdoor signs ( ) The location and arrangement of proposed means of access and egress, Including sidewalks, driveways or other paved areas; profiles indicating grading and cross sections showing width of roadway, location and width of sidewalks and location and size of water and sewer lines. ( ) Any proposed grading, screening and other landscaping including types and locations of proposed street trees. ( ) The location of all proposed waterlines, valves and hydrants and of all sewer lines or al. tern9te means of water supply and sewage disposal - and isposal -and treatment. AMMIi ( ) An outline of any proposed deed restriction and/or covenants. ( ) Any contemplated public improvements on or adjoining the property. ( ) If the site development plan indictes only a first stage, a supplementary plan shall indicate ultimate development. ( ) Any other information deemed by the Planning Board necessary to determine conformity of the site plan with the intent and regulations of this chapter. ov 2 51988 `i.Jj March 2 , 1988 To Whom It May Concern : This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina (Port of Egypt Enterprises ) for William Lieblein , located on Route 25 (Main Road ) , Southold , New York . AUTHORIZED BY : NAME: DATE: /� /P$ i • 3` .i 3 o Q H w A to � r ON x po V fD CL WIAU � US i i40 w_, `-- 1-'S TO ll E S S- - "lam very pleased with the speed with which you sold lmyl t > P Aquasport and the price achieved...(When) we are In the marketfora newpowerboat,PORTOF EGYPTwlll beatthe verytop of the preferred list of dealersto do business with., "A credit to the boating Industry...The price actually paid —Leland S Zaubler,Philadelphia,PA for the work performed was lower than the quoted price...This Is a reflection of PORT OF EGYPT'S honesty and "Thankyou foryourprompt and efficient service.Wethink fairness...I have been fortunate to have purchased a quality of you often as we frolic about beautiful (Block) Island, boat from a first class dealership." because if It were not for PORT OF EGYPT,we'd never have —Richard L.Russo, Rivervale.NJ, in a letter made itl•' to Eddie Smith,President of Grady-White —Emily and Wilson Langworthy,New Rochelle.NY We must compliment you and your staff forathoroughly "What really Impressed us was the factthat we were treated bo enjoyable experience in purchasing, rigging and commis- rt as well In the purchase of a used boat as someone who stoning the Sailfish ... We feel we were treated fairly, bought a new boat." honestly and that expert workmanship went Into the boat. —Patty and Ron Billings,Allendale. NJ We would not hesitate to recommend Port of Egypt and "Soat dealers are usually the type of people that close and look forward to seeing you this fall for winter storage and say goodbye. You have to be the exception to the rule[... service. You're the bestl" Robert S.Nate,Woodbury.NY —George Dennis. Miller Place, L.I., NY HOW TO GET HERE PORT OF EGYPT IS IDEALLY LOCATED ON From Newyork Cfty/the Metropolitan area: LONG ISLAND'S HISTORIC NORTH FORK ON Take the Long Island Expressway east to the end,exit#73.Then pick SOUTHOLD BAY — up Route 58 which becomes Route 25(the Main Road)in Riverhead Sheltered yet minutes away from open water, PORT OF EGYPT is and continue east approximately 20 miles. The PORT OF EGYPT is within easy reach of the Peconics. Long Island Sound,Plum Gut. The located on Route 25 about one mile east of the center of Southold Race, Gardeners Bay. Shmnecock Inlet. East Hampton, Sag Harbor, village on the way to Greenport Watch for the red PORT OF EGYPT Montauk and Block Island. sign From Connecticut and New England: A DELIGHTFUL VACATION SPOTI Take the Orient-New London Ferry to Orient Point at the end of Long While you're on the North Fork, enjoy our beautiful beaches, fine Island's North Fork Take Route 25(the Main Road)approximately 12 restaurants,bird sanctuaries.antique shops,country fairs and festivals. miles to PORT OF EGYPT,located at the sign of the red circle between vineyards.horseback riding,and exploring our delightful 300-year-old the villages of Greenport and Southold villages. > 1 1'^ w no M1� fR ...,� ours• ,.:4: {�' _ 1 1 rWm Out •� R erz4 r _ _, hti H1 '1,' ' ' a.• _. zz m. r ` rp w•a " ran0es •t•x t 1 t - •: e', PORT OF EGYPT 'B 1 auxofx 1 r• p `' Southold,Long Island,N.Y.11971 o °M Mo[ yy BOrt Sales.Service.Storage.Docking.15161 765-2445 Balt i Tackle.Charters.Launching Ramp.15161765-39]E _ N�'=• •••. Fish Market.(516) 765-3200 i } Motel.)5161 765-5121 Y �d�(/_ ,.� ss �• ,-` ,t f GM Shop.(516) 765-1830 Restaurant.1516)765-3010 F)O THIS INDENTUR made the 20th day of September ,nineteen hundred oad seventy-eight freb!�`- BETWEEN WILLIAM J. LTEBLPN, residing at 125 Sterling treet, • Village of Greenport, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State �... ... of New York and HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN, residing at no numb¢r Hippedrome Drive, Southold, Town o , Southold, County of Suffolk an State of New York, 4 9 t a7n party of the first part, and PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISE, INC. , a domesCorporation t" N having its principal place of business at no number Mairl Road, d Arshamomaque, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and S ate of New York, � � I e party of the second parr, \ WITNESSETH, that the party of rhe first parr, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable consideration paid by the parry of the second part, does hereby grant and release unto the party of the second port, the heirs Of succesaus and assigns of the party of the stead part forever, ALL that certain plor, piece or parcel of land, with else buildings and improvements dterean elated, aituate, lying an,l being in the Hamlet of Arshomomaque, Town of Southold, 'County of b Suffolk and State of New York, bounded and described as-ifollows: r BEGINNING at a monument on the southerly line of Old Maip Road at the northeasterly corner of land conveyed by the parties of ��ypo the first part to the party of the second part by Deed Jp 1970; from said point of beginning running along said southerly line of Old Main Road, North 87 degrees, 38 minutes, 30 seconds East, 477.45 feet to a monument; thence along land of Becker, -South 26 �9 0� degrees, 47 minutes , 00 seconds East, 409.0-feet to ordtaary high �. � water mark of Budd' s Pond; thence westerly to a point on-'said -= - - ordinary high water mark which is South 78 degrees, 03 minutes , 10 seconds West, 514. 71 feet from the last described poi-it; thence along said land conveyed by the parties of the first pie to the party of the second part, five courses: (1) North 12 de4rees, 38 minutes , 00 seconds West, 226.0 feet to a monument; ttlence (2) North 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds East, 12.0 feet; thence (3) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds West; 35. 0 feet ; thence (4) South 64 degrees, 55 minutes, 00 seconds West, 12.0 feet; thence (5) North 25 degrees, 05 minutes, 00 seconds ,, West , 220.58 feet to the point of BEGINNING. I It is intended that this conveyance include all of the area -`t, between the two side lines of the above described premises. . =1 This is a d ed which corrects the description of the above parcel set forth 'f a deed dated March 16, 1972 and recorded in tiber of Deeds 8467 at page 151, ! TOGETHER with all right, title and interest, if any, of the party of the first part in and to spy streets and roads abutting the above described premises to the tenter lines thereof; TOGETHER with dw stipwomanglets and id all the estate and rights of the party of the first part in ato said premises; TO HAVE AND HOLD the premises herein granted unto the parry of the stand put, the heirs or successors and assigns of till party of the second part forever. t AND the parry of the Arse part covenants that the party of the firm part has not done or suffered any0ing whereby the said premises have been encumbered in any way whatever,except as oforrosid. AND the party of the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law,covenants that the party of the first parr will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such cotislderstion its a least fund to be applied first-for the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the sate first to the psymenr of the cost of the improvement before using onj pan of the total of the same for any or*purpose. The word "party" shall be construed as if it read "parties whenever the sense of this indenture so'.requags. JN. WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of the fust pan has duly executed this deed the day still yJar first above it wren. V\ IN PR45P.NCP. Op: ;._ .......-... ' REAL ESTA'T$ - -WILL J. B IN OCT 3 1 1978 TRAN'SFEQt 11AX HERMAN K. LIEBLEIN � \ SOWOLK Ty. 473-00-948 sNnM., N.Y.1.r.u. Iw1. 1007. Wpl,W a.l.Dye.t1N C..,y+111at.st Oln««'s•s1r-Iaa1.N.««C«yM1iN. 1 l LiBER8524 PAa327 STAT[OP NR1A/ pRK.OOVNM 09 /�� »r STATR OF/N�9W YORK.COUNTS•0/ »: On the �7 rj day of ]`PI�G��Y�f/`�,(- 197 ,before toe On the /60 dry of '``��/''��,��//� eiq7te,bc(om me personally cum �rK00 peatxnlly��� �o me known to be ndwho m ofe known to be rhe individual ibed in am who execugtd th tged that eirm the Mregoing iaacruttfent aknow4dgtd that l/(v Jj4taeatted t& tame.[mot samtRIC NafARY PUBLIC. Stats of Nsw York ERIC G. %OCR - No. 52.2162100 QWIIRee in Sultolk Conon/l Np1ARY PUBLIC,62.2162 or New YaRI Tarm tKD4» Natth �'1�9 No. 52 2[62100 "�usa in sarrolt conne Jtrm wites March 30, 197 STAT!OF NEW YOU,=01"Of at STAT/0!NSW YORK,COUNTT Of »t On the d9 of 19 ,before me OD the day of 19 before me personally ams personally came to me known, who, bnint by trc mom on[, did depose and the subscribin wimera to the foregoing itattwtpnt,with whom my that he resides at No. I w acquainted, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and ay that he resides at No. that he is the Of that he knows the corporation da ribed in and wh" emtasati the.famplttg itutruo or that he o be the i�vdtal kmmm the sal of rid cotpoatori; that the sal a�ed no aid desafbad in and who executed the foregoing i t, that ioscnument is tact cospm to sal; that it was so aHiaed by order he,aid subscribing witzxa was present acrd saw of the board of ditamrs of said axpotation, and that he saccate the arae; std that he, mid. wittier, at the same signed h name thereto by like bider. time subscribed h oante as witnnerYheteta.,\ Y' BARGAIN AND''ALE DEED arxrtoN 05600 WrrH CovaNANT ArA{Nor GRANrools Acts BLOCS 0600 - Tura Na tar 005000/006000 WILLIAM J. LIEBLEIN and. rronhrm tw Towtr. Suffolk. - HERMAN K. LIESLEI14 . Recorded at Request of COMMONWEALTH LAND TO PORT OF EGYPT EIiTERPRISES, INC: TITLR INSURANCE COMPANY, ' etaYuu+ sY sot,res. Schwartz A Resh, P.C � pj s atrar at Naw"alt aOAan or seta vo w6m 150 Broadway Db1N,W Al New York, New York 10038 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY zip Na, t CIA do V 7-0 - aaft�d:•r anrrt�� . l Bla Nd td Z lE tip aaoao�3a �e • C �Q AJAL) w;v 2 1988 • X I I �,•uY,NMl,�d]IrnpB M SL�hh�F !s z �a' Ll:,:.LANU :�.,LJGcV�YG32�:� — :'.!2GF"*JT `r, •�'.'� -. -- --- �---- -- S' Z Z Z _ E a v WIVED • i) ��vnZ QCT,2 4 1988 �FF 00`' ore, Ahold Tnw� M-A JAMES A.SCHONDEBARE Cpn77 Town Hall, 5U3095 Main Road TOWN ATfURNLY P.O. BOX 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ROBERT H-BERNTSSON O'! r TELEPHONE .ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNLY 516) 765-1939 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY D l L d 'J TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OCT 2 41996 TO: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk FROM: James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney SOUTHOLD TOWN DATE: October 21, 1988 PLANNING BOARD REF: Zoning Map-Wetland parcel between old road and Rte. 25 near Port of Egypt Marina You have asked my opinion concerning the zoning district on the above mentioned parcel. A review of the maps submitted shows the parcel was originally zoned Business in 1957. According to the development plan map of June 1967, it was intended to be Residential, and that classification is shown on our current zoning map. Based on the maps, it is our opinion that the parcel in question is zoned Residential. cc: Building Department O v Niz Sk Q � C 0 � o u � o LO W ^ � � o^ 1 � J I 8 O � LU - z3 II/1� 2 a J J N 0 O U J 2 C a 0 R 2 a U Z i o z Z 1 a J 1 i i 1 o N i � � I e U a I F' O N N 6 a � M J a I O o m i o >s Z I I Q,F SO U TNOL D SUFFOLK COUNTY NEW YORK S �E C 77/ON DF' S/X SEC TIONS SGA�E BOOFT-- (/N. p i000 7000 -- 3000 9Uao A - LEGENO -- �A" Residc�f�/-Ayr�cu/fur�sl �� •. MAPPEo NOY• 18 /.g "M"high//r!u/tiP/e Residence N TUYL 9r SON `M-I"Genera//1�/u/fip/cRcs. NEE "B" 1.ig#7t Business ` � L/CENSEO LAND 5VRv GREEiVPORT, /V- Y. `B-l' Ger�er�/Busir�css C Liyhf indusfrio/ "C-J"�`enera/ /ndusfrio/ 0 0 a Q Z J 0 ? p � o � v � go CZ o a L�GEN 41 � uS �� ffonnr � Z Jc> z nTo S r i t. Q Nf till m v V /^ loulsnpul 145rl n C—� 3 X.JDd 9oi330/loujsnpul 4451-1 o�,J O z a aullDVq II 7vj Zw 3 I auuDyi I W 0 r a , ssauisng Iojauao �1 ssauisny lalwoH eH L1J ssawsng pallwi-I e, z J aoi;;o/Ioiluaplsaa oa Lo ollua Isa a Lo I P. a/1�osa as U Li IoiluapisaH 44lsu90 la{woH aH 0 > 4 Allsuao Moi Iolluaplsaa ooc-a o Xllsua4 Mo'l IolluaplsaH ooz-a g I(jlsuaa Moi Ioiluaplsaa O � V dlisuao Mo'I Iolluapis08 oe-a add. /lisuao Mo"I Iolluaplsaa ova uoilonjasuoo Ioln4inou6d o-v I a J a I - U Z w ® F un z uL- 3 F co w _z 17� to to x � a 0 z 0 CO CO N Lu 0® O) CIOr . r 00 03 U F-' N C7. CO[D �� LUC� N 90 r 0) W W J !/ rn S` � n T r` . NU3 "i Z r W L1J ® nJ w U)z zz ¢ i I LL wm o J' LLLLJ LLJV/ IBJ W LU LU OC Town Hall, 53095 Main Road c �r P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 1 = ) TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM To: Frank J. Kujawski, President of the Trustees From: Bennett orlowski,Jr. , Chairman of the Planning Board Date: September 19, 1988 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM #1000-56-6-2 The Planning Board reviewed your letter and the accompanying materials. A site plan will be required. Consequently, the Board would like to be lead agent in the environmental review. However, a site plan application has not been filed as of this date. When the application is filed, an overall plan showing the entire site must be included. Thank you for bringing this to our attention. cc: Building Department Zoning Board Conservation Advisory Council jt ` tr' 16 4 o�05�FFOt,tcD� FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o [ - TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President 01 (5162 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III O � o� JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Soutliold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 658 - Port of Egypt, Inc. 1000-056--4 & 6 - 10. 1-11-13-.2-3 . 2-3 .3-4-6. 1 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your progress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation. Feel free to contact this office at ( 516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. er�y ours . cv, Frank A. K 7awski, Jr. , Pres. Board of own Trustees FAK:ip Attachment CC: Peconic Associates, Inc. on behalf of Port of Egypt, Inc. Army Corps of Engineers New York State Dept. of State Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Planning Board V Board of Appeals 1 . 40 0 • F OL(r�o FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, )R., President a TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516) 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD IL O D Town Hall, 53095 Main Road W P.O. Box 728 $� s Southold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11981 Re: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. 1000-056-4 & 6-10. 1-11-13 .2-3 . 2-3-4-6.1 Dear Benny: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1 . Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of Lead Agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a Completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. Requested Action: To erect a 25,440 sq. ft. boat storage building. SEQRA Classification: ( ) ,Type I ( V Unlisted Contact Person: Ilene Pfifferling, Clerk on behalf of Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. Board of Town Trustees The Lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project should one be 40 • -Z- • necessary. Within 30 days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being the lead agency. Trustee Board Position: ( ) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( � This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, F�nk .J awski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK: ip Attachment cc: Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals D.E.C. Stony Brook Peconic Associates on behalf of the Port of Egypt, Inc. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President ; _ 49 (516) 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, DI JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 14, 1988 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: Application No. 658 - Port of Egypt, Inc. 1000-056--4 & 6 - 10 . 1-11-13-. 2-3 . 2-3 . 3-4-6. 1 Dear Mr. Greene: Please be advised that this office has received a partial application in the above referenced matter. Pursuant to the Code of the Town of Southold, the Board of Town Trustees will not act upon an application until it is deemed complete by the submission of documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been received. Please keep this office informed of your progress in this matter. We wish to be involved in your environmental review under the S.E.Q.R.A. Legislation. Feel free to contact this office at ( 516) 765-1932 should you have any questions in regard to this matter. er�Y ours . V t Frank A. K jawski, Jr. , Pres. Board of own Trustees FAK:ip Attachment cc: Peconic Associates, Inc. on behalf of Port of Egypt, Inc. Army Corps of Engineers New York State Dept. of State Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Planning Board Board of Appeals 14-16-2'(2187)-7c 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be-prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officerl Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor - NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E Answers to these questions will be considerer' as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional, information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on Information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Strwt Addnay,Municipality and County) Rte . 25 , Southold, N . Y. 11971 NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPNONE Peconic Associates Inc . - Merlon Wi in Pres . (516) 477-0030 ADDRESS One Bootleg Alley CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE N . Y. 11944 NAME OF OWNER(If dtffarant) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Bill Lieblein - Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . (516 ) 765-2445 ADDRESS Rte . 25 CITY/PO STATEZIP CODE — '-Southold __ _--- _ N . Y. 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION errection of a 25 , 440 Sq. Ft . boat storage building Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. it not applicable A.. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban 0Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) []Rural(non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 2 . 1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres Forested 0 __ acres 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres 0 acres Water Surface Area - W a t e r 0 . 1 acres 0 . 1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) _ 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 2 . 0 acres 2 . 0 acres Other (indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Fd - F i l l t.a n d . nredged M n r n r i a l a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained % of site ❑Moderately well drained 20 % of site ❑Poorly drained 80 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N /A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes UNO a. What is depth to bedrock? N/A (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: (BO-10% 100 % ❑10-15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes UNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes WNo B. What is the depth of the water table? - 3tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ®No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes CY'No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes UNo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? Dyes 7_7No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Dyes LkNo - 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary — -- 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No - water a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? E3Yes ❑N)to., b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes UNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, ArticlL-25•AA. Section 303 and 3041 ❑Yes ANo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? -Dyes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes 9]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2 . 1 acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 16 5 ; proposed 64 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 ' height; 120 ' width: 212 ' length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 240 ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i a rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? Dyes ONO 13N/A a. If yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? Dyes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? O acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dyes J]No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. _ d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO _ B. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes [RNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 6 ; after project is complete 2 - - 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes ENO a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes MO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Dyes ONO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 12Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? f�Yes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill + location Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes bNo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Dyes ElNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton /month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes tNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes ffNo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ]Yes IJNo If yes , Indicate type(s) plprrriral _ hnilding lighting 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. ( seasonal - May through October ) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Dyes JLINo If Yes, explain — 4 01 25. Approvals Required: ' Submittal Type Date City. Town, Village Board []Yes No City, Town Village Planning Board 0QYes ❑No Southold Town City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ❑No Southold Town City, County Health Department ❑Yes WNo Other Local Agencies Dyes WNo Other Regional Agencies []Yes LNNo State Agencies ®Yes ONO New York State D. E . C . Federal Agencies ❑Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IRYes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Mzoning variance ]special use permit ❑subdivision (site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? C—Light Industrial 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? see attached plan 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change from present — C—Light Industrial 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ( Yes ❑No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radius of proposed action? see land use map 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoin ing/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? ( Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes nNo _ a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes Eglslo a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any aJverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor a Peconic Associates , Inc .. Date May 10 , 1988 Signature Title President If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are tate agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 w-w.n . 87r-9- 617.21 SEOR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-'/2 1/23 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which Is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 13 Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n • The State Forest Preserve? N/A ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? N/A • National Park Service lands? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? N/A • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? N/A • A governmentally established or designated Interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? N/A • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? N/A • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ • State? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e.. screened by summer,foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes MNo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? IM Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within •M4 mile •1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ® ❑ Commercial ® ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ® ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: 01/2 mile ®Yes El No 01 miles mYes ❑No 02 miles ®Yes El No •3 miles ®Yes El No • Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 5 to 10 , 000 NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. T CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action Is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by. residents ® ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o `� I TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President x 5161 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. Q� �`a0� WD BDARD { HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TO: Planning Board Building Department Zoning Board of Appeals Conservation Advisory Council FROM: Trustee Office RE: Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. DATE: August 15 , 1988 Please find attached, an application for the above referenced project . May we have your informal comments regarding this project at the earliest possible date? Thank you for your cooperation in regard to this matter. I P:h k f 15"u a , 't-i �. . 4roe tee S Pl`z.� Ln TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOMHOLD Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPLICATION NO. `_—_--� DATE OF APPL I CAT ION May 1 jL­ 1988 Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . 765-2445 IDENTITY OF APPLICANT 9YP P PHONE NO ADDRESS OF APPLICANT Rte . 25 , Southold . N . Y . 11971 —__- ----------------- TAX MAP NO. 1000-056-4 & 6 - 10 . 1 - 11 - 13 . 2-3 . 2-3 . 3-4-6 . 1 ---- — ---` 477-0030 AGENT--Peconic Associates , Inc . —PHONE NO. PERMIT REQUESTED To erect a 25 , 440 Sq . Ft . boat storage building LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED Rte . 25 , Southold , N. Y . 1197 NOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Budd�s PPoond _- Southold Bao_ SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK- 35 ' In height - rl_dy�e 45 ' ' — LENGTH 212 ' WIDTH 120 ' HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER Floor E1 . 6 . 0 ' DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER N/A YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED 100 Yds_ (for building foundation and storm drains ) --------------- YARDS TO BE FILLED N/A WIDTH OF CANAL , CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY I to 2 miles DEPTH AT LOW TIDENIA AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 2 DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 30 FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA 0F IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? business AREA ZONING--C-Light Industrial MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED backhoe and material will be re-used for foundation grading INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY boat storage - marina DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE fishing station and boat rentals AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENT] AGENCY--none—to our knowledge DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY_ site to be re-graded- after construction and landscaped as per attached plan WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT, attached ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? NO COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS: Merlon E. Wiggin BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS, AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER BET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. i SI NATURE OF APPLICAN SWORN TO /BEFORE ME THIS 3,ic DAY OF Q-Jk--4 fJSrf- 19 JOAN A. JACOBS Yak NO"RY PUBLIC No. 4702900 Qualified in Suffolk Canty Commission Expires Mardi 30, 190? EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT, DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED " WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS, DOCKS , WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS . IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 14-16-2'(2/87)-7c 617.21 SEAR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatureof Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor - NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E Answers to these questions will be considerer' as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona. information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3 It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on Information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or Investigation If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . LOCATION OF ACTION(Iftiuds Street Address,Municipality and Count» Rte . 25 Southold, N. Y. 11971 NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Peconic Associates Inc . - Merlon Wi in Pres . (516) 477-0030 ADDRESS One Bootleg Alley CITYIPO STATEZIP CODE N . Y. 11944 NAME OF OWNER(11 diffareel) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Bill Lieblein - Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . 15161765-2445 ADDRESS Rte . 25 CITYIPO STATE 21P CODE Southold N . Y . 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION errection of a 25 , 440 Sq . Ft . boat storage building Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A.. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban (Industrial ❑Commercial OResidential(suburban) ORural(non-farm) Oforest OAgriculture OOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 2 . 1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres Forested —0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres 0 acres Water Surface Area - w t e r 0 . 1 acres 0 • 1 acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres 0 acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 2 . 0 acres 2 . 0 acres Other (indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) On project site? Fd — Fill Land , Dredged Material a. Soil drainage: OWell drained % of site OModerately well drained 20 % of site OPoorly drained 80 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? N /A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? OYes [3No a. What is depth to bedrock? NIA (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of proposed protect site with slopes: M-10% 100 % ❑10-15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes IDNo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes WNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? _ 3 , tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Dyes ffNo R� 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes ®No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes E*qo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes 13No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes A3No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ,y4 Dyes CkNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NIA a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? MYes ❑No — water a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? nYes ❑N7to., b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Dyes LNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? Dyes (NNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Dyes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes ZJNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7 acres. b Project acreage to be developed: 2 . 1 acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) .t e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; I. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 16 5 ; proposed 64 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 height; 120 ' width; 2 12 length. j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2401 ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i e rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ONO K1 N/A a. If yes, for what intend , purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes $7No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 13 Yes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Dyes [RNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 6 ; after project is complete 2 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes ®No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes E]No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes MO Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ONO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? C Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [DYes []No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? 0Yes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill ; location Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes NO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Cl Yes R]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton /month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []Yes No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ffNO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes MNo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? nYes ONo If yes , indicate type(s) P l P r t r i r n l _ h u i l d i n g lighting 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. ( seasonal — May through October ) 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? ❑Yes J1No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: ' ! • Submittal Type Date City, Town. Village Board UYes In No City, T_ow_r, Vdldge Planning Board NYes ❑No Southold Town City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ❑No Southold Town City, County Health Department ❑Yes WNo Other Local Agencies ❑Yes WNo Other Regional Agencies []Yes IJNo State Agencies UYes ❑No New York State D. E . C. Federal Agencies El Yes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? CRYes []No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Mzoning variance 63special use permit ❑subdivision 1} site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? C—Light Industrial 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? —see attached plan 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change from present — C—Light Industrial 5 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? (, Yes ❑No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/. mile radius of proposed action? see land use map 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? QYes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ®No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? ❑Yes �7No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes []No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes L a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any a.lverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor a Peconic Associates , Inc .. Date May 10 , 1988 5 4 4 Title President If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are tate agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 is-u-n 87rtk • 617.21 • SEAR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question I 1 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-'/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3.5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 13 Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? •❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ M • The State Forest Preserve? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? N/A • National Park Service lands? NIA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? N/A • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? N/A • A governmentally established or designated Interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? N/A • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? N/A • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ R ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ • State? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer.foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes PNo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ©Yes 0 N 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within •1A mile •1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ® ❑ Commercial ® ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ® ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous Cl Cl Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: •'/z mile ®Yes 0 N •1 miles [nYes C1 No •2 miles ®Yes ❑No •3 miles ®Yes 0 N • Distance from project site are provided for assistance.Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is S to 10 ,000 NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved in recreational activities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by, residents ® ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 March 2 , 1988 To Whom It May Concern : This letter authorizes PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC . to act in my behalf in making applications and securing necessary permits relative to the construction of a Boat Storage Building for an existing marina ( Port of Egypt Enterprises ) for William Lieblein , located on Route 25 (Main Road ) , Southold , New York . AUTHORIZED BY : NAME : DATE: y R+ - O if 7 ,{� o a Ny O C „Oyu 5 'O ti � ► .C , ,+� � lY � E y 1 +� ,F V 1 a ro06 _ V ' L � I � �'� s w . ` ��, �. ' ,S lit wi OIOE-S 91517Wanamm ,• .. -. c.�",, .r'• ' OE8 191ST•dour in9 ! S9L(91SI'leloyy OOZE-59L 19151'UnPEw Usti _ • 'i- • 'S-, ' - - ,'_I:. ...�. ' ,�a: .. 816E-S9L(91ST•dwell bulsiwne7•siey)e43•al>I3<17 Morg • .�_ ��� •- SbbZ-S9L 191S)•6uppo0'06el03S-a3Wa5'salK 11008 "� - 3eino;(`. �i; - • _ Wyss.. • '"`," IL611'A'N'Puelfl 6uWI VIOL lnoS' /F. _ s. •W ::i' 4�: U vaYnov '��'. .'.•� .: 1dA'D3 d01110d :.•�:: I '�' gimp ,m+w' )yarW ' -JJ. F s<. w.wew "s rz� •.�>•K"'>!: z`b � )• •`n:i. - v ,.4 'sabell! plo41noS pue uodwa1910 sa6epin aw plo-le--A-OOE In1146lPp mo 6uuoldxa Due•6u1pu)13egas1o4•spiefauln uaamiaq aplu pai a4110 u6ls aW le palml'1dA93:10 18()d o3 sallw 'sleAllsal Pue sl!el Anuno3'sdo4s anbque'sauenmes pqq•sluelnelsal Zl Alalewlxoldde 1peoM u!eyy a411 SZ ainoo ailel '111oj 411ON 5-puelg auy 'sa43eaq Inlpneaq ino Aofua 11100 4UoN a4]uo a{noA alliLm 6uul to Pua a4i le lulod luau0 Ol Auaj uopu0l MaN-lualio a4l a)lel IlOdS NOIIV:)VAlnd1HD1134 V :Puel6u3 miry Pue 3n3P34uuo3 wo+3 u61s puelsl)poI8 pue:lneluoyy 1dA93 jO 1MOd pal a411ol 433e%A liodwal9 o)Aem aql uo a6ellm •logleH 6e5 'uoldweH Ise] •lalul H)O]au4l4S 'Ae8 vaulpl E) •aWd PIo41noS 10 lalua3 ql 10]sea n!w auo lnoge SZ ainca uo pale30l a41'Ing wnld'punoS puelsl buol •opuwad a41 to 43ea1 Asea ul41lm sl idA93 j0 LMOd 341 -sallw OZ Aalewixoldde isea anuquol pue s! 1dA93 j0 ld0d wi m undo wo11 Aeme salnu!w laA pa/alla4S pea4lanld w Ipeod uleyy a47I SZ alnod sawoiaq 43!4m es ainod do —Ave Q-IOI-I.I.f•10S ipld uayl'EL#l!xa•pua a4l of]sea Aemssaidx3 puelsl 6uo-1 ayl ailel NO>1210d HMON JRIOISIH S.UNVISI DNOI mwe ueglodwiayy a43/4:)3poA maN luwj NO a31V>'Ol Al1V301 SI MA93 JO 1MOd 32131-1.1.39 Ol JAOH AN'1l 'aXld)all!W's!uuap a61oa9— AN'AingPoogA'a)eN S ua(109 ..13saq a43 a3 noA •a3puas •••lalnl a p o3 uolldama a43 aq of ane13 noA•aAgpoo6 Aes pue armols 1a3ulm 1o;Ile;5143 nod 6ulaas of plemlo;3lool pue asop Imp aldoad;o a"a43 Allensn we valeap 3eog„ pue Wba;o uod puawwo3w 03 a1e31sa4 lou pinom ag13 fN'alepuallV's6ulll!8 uod Pue Aned— 'ie"a43 owl wam dlllsuelu)llom 3ladxa ley)pue Aluau04 •3eogmaue346noq 'AI11e; PaWW3 slam am las► aAN ... 4sylleS 043 6uluOls o4m ouoawos se 3eoq pass a jo ese431nd mo ul llamse un( -slwwoi pue 6u16611 '6ulse431nd ul a3ualladxa algedo(ua pwau a lam am 3e4333e;ayt sem sn passaldwl Allea13e4pq„ AI46nwoy1 elo;yeas)noA pue nodwawlldwoi unw aLy3„ AN'alla40d m N'A4u0mfwel u0s111A PuL Nlw3— "a114/31-AME)10 luaP!sald 1105 41PP3 01 1.131 apew )anal a u!11V'alenlanld'ossnd l pleg3!d— aAe4laAau P.am'.LdAE)3 d01310d 1o;lou wam 3111 asne3aq - Lislaleap ssep Ivy a ww;3eoq 'puelsl ()136181 InlPneaq vmge illol; am se uaMo nod;o A311enbe pase431nd ane4 o3 a3eunIjol uaaq aAe41•••ssau3le; )1ul43 oAN*a3puas wa13yW pue 3dwwd 1noAlo;na )lueyy, pue Alsauoli s-6uE)3 d01MOd;o uolvaya1 a sl slyl•••a3pd pa3onb a43 uell3 lamol sem petwo;.lad M1om o41 10; Vd'egdlapel!4d'lalgneZ'S puelsl— Pled Allerwe a311d ay1...f43snpul 5upeoq a43 o3 31pa13 V.. ,;4Am ssaulsnq op o1 valeaplo ull pallalald a43;o do3 Alan a433e ag lllmldAE)3d0 jAod'3eogjamod mau a lo;3aVew ���� �O 1�0� a43 ul we am lua4M**-paAal43e a3pd a43 pue uodsenby (Aw I plos no.(4314m 431m paads a43431m paseald Aan we l,. 111o8V AVS sumoism ano iVH/A NH3H 3 q y E. N E p Q W A 012 Y a L o � L .cq Eq +Zc ca�y � t ry .,o p _ IE 2 Lv] ,y O €NC. X03 o° Et ° W Ury .iOmm6 „ n ° FE Z Cv 0 L 3 C z ry � Ex � EE m C y Q Z_ t p O N V 7 m Oi � �' .�n ry W >- � t 3 ` � ` a LWi2 dv = '0 ZCx " ' o- 5: - Z q 0 C Y cl - _ q Lt ° cJ5 R” av a' ti m �LO � � � a � oEq� U.) - MC3 Wz uv _ 9 0 '° LuQ -JJ 3 �. vvl7Ep1 WH mc ' `D QO ~ LL clz T O q Y/ N N a C '= a N ¢ g 2 q C W2a oa� L � o � ` f' = vane QH o� Zi+ " n � 'tiE ( O u _ qt HF� jW � Q� 3c °c � 1 acaoa 1 f�: OW 3: A ova HOOF1, og ° m5 � o " - � H ayvv Z' � � O O � G ° a°O '°^ E .�-- LGQ �oE � WLOO) L" LLQCMocm Ica 12 iCC cc - '1 _+ ' r Y '� Nv _o E cL a ' o = uv awE 3rco'a � ooZ,ao v � O^ J:c VC ` � L�`oo ryv 'E OV w �mv� c $ � m ' 11. v3avo V-00 q L ✓N q —2 N r ` / •Y O O C O EO a n q go c � INSM� o a v , ° 'v 'C id R= 9 ry c Z C V �� J °cv0 , - ooC vs t01vry aav0amT 2 F ° LA Cc Nryo Rco c 8.2u OD - gcw7cCv , E2�vvc _ Ri o of � co VV a g o ' N W ry LL M a :D _ q ZF' !0 Y a '] Y �G - L L W O J u1 Avtiv �n ! ;n V V via &ate > oEo �^o A - _ Q g v G Clm p J 3 {{E e - 3 o L Q. ry C e n a ry IIIIIIIIN .R®� C O uz 1Z 2 v c LL q c u L C q J F O vv = ma ti _ w L41 Eryyv = ' � It . ►� 5 3 c c l7 C J5ry ° v C O 1 �• 5-5 C SI L N v 1 V32 - 3 A E 'r. L ry f !€ O GAv ` � " q C q q _ _Jm n in in _ a J c v c a° gv3aly � °c O L 0u'0 {I L ` o � y4 ` Q pO � C y LL O ` �+ 1 oa.. E .S £ f- co T f p Ip a 7 Q O H ,°� A n. 2 ^ b b • 2 �new m� I � d�jo3, Og�2 zio3yaa � oTi � 01 0 & m �+ z wre $ 7 m � W r , D� � !v b^ gNO ar3�N ?' 60 x ° "m F Ix m b S A Ccr E.;04 A A � �` - 086 irDai orn � Na 0x32 � 5 f� D 1 d NF; ns co- " ge ML ^ gu:3' rynC,�m0� 6o n � 08 ° � � G, �o p �W �A�O �m o' o QRS M b O .! CI 7 b b H nZo, �•O r. N �'� � a ��CM7 �n b � � arD 6 �rD a' � $ S� $$ry 7 rn m $ (� 8 ? N �oor�o =mE IUSc. - mo3i O F ^ O -1 b N y A b = b x .O A O b in - A y F A C N y .c w - "V ��C a w N� b c `�. ^ D O °'Oo new ^ $ � �n � or OL p O N m ¢ 3 d �" c d J N E p N O' C W a y rD rD = Z m m b Ll G jzr Er 3. r0 $ ¢�a N b Cc °,8 C c F Wow = pd :3 , 8 0 d $r ,�' as n O ° A n �SSy ..-.. u H N -Ai � ��: ~ N T tom' 0 r .. 0 2. o -On w$93� ; Jy oD.zd m� ( I a a 0 b E o 0 0 c e 13 : m tt ° 83 Tog ? � oaio °ajmLo • N. ° N b ' V w b N C ] I m ° Trp m 7A 0 'L D ° N O " S-°o m w v CL ar w r. Er pf 1 o ^ 1 nnarvlo ^ A N $ R N .^. ry N H N� H a IA FA y !DCLC 2 w / N [' Z c N OroN Nary t° J J_C e € ?38 WO0 � 3 c yio w ao moCc y ry b n y o 7mA � y2ip ryof A O C _ C CIL Ovr^e � �� o'KRoo A oI� 5 � r3D6j,. ngao'o. o - . �'�� o Ea o n 3rD ^ n`° N ro C`c vno D o opo 3160- 1 - N. � RrpO ti n� < low y� � c >•� 3m ° � wy�c3 „ori , •:. 'I axGg n 'D E5awn E; 2S ° � :' 1 yaoo cm c A °m m3a J`, 0 c . c y �., , �r,Y • ' i cv F o fo N 0 3 noCL n $ ° o 0.0 `�^ ') o O ° @N a t o N a Cl Nz wZ) n� n � nw :o A p � � gw P ti T D 4F S C. Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 February 2, 1988 Merlon Wiggin President Peconic Associates, Inc. _ P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Proposed expansion of Port of Egypt Marina SCTM # 1000-56-6-6-1, 10.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: In response to our meeting of Nov.�7acr-:: -5, 1987, the proposed expansion was reviewed and researched. The following items should be considered before you submit the proposed application to amend the site plan: 1. A special Exception to expand a marina use must be obtained from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning Board will coordinate its review with the Zoning Board of Appeals. r 2. A variance will be required for the front yard setback of the proposed building. 3. Flood zone requirements must be addressed. 4. Safe storage of liquid petroleum and gasoline on-site must be addressed. 5. Show all parking for the entire complex, including the boat storage area on the north side of State Route 25 and the leased area. 6. Consider approaching the State about abandonment of Old State Route 25 to improve access to the site. (see enclosed diagram. ) 7. Indicate which existing buildings on-site will be kept and which will be removed. Show location of overhead racks. Shed on east side of proposed building should be removed to improve vehicular access around building. PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. «+?' - Engineering, Marine & Energy Consultants Environmental Planning One BoutlegAlley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 November 20 , 1987 Ms . Valerie Scopaz Southold Town Planner Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Boat Storage Shed . Dear Ms . Scopaz : Enclosed is one ( 1 ) copy of the Preliminary Layout of the above referenced project in preparation of our meeting on Wednesday , November 25 , 1987 . Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. t� a Merlon E . Wiggin , Ph . O . ,M. E. President cc : Mr . William Lieblein with Attachment MEW/iw ^ � 1 r l 1�'ii�t.�('J���ptra'+��t'!gtiY bk�'�y'fri�` 4• ...�"rl�r> �_. - rr.�nss..�r•• `��.�Z�"` a ' ^' Ir �y`^. 1» n�i. i � v4 ice. r T r�i}.�.1'�� �k'd.� {c� 1'"r✓ T� .T�t ,w k'�i S���' Q d��i Iti h ryY IV Aw'{+d l+k 111.4 IW S•R\�{ � '..G}'Y ;(�.-l� :�.Y�li�, x``il G�'I S�.R � !��F'r,�',. Y ,~Or'S.�M 1.7}7aha '•i J A11!; I .Zt�y 6., IT�.,,1{�4wre� t 'r St � K.e' Y t� 11 3 r ,< �� ,: e v,, xsr Y` An. L •I?}..w7 t' T 1,1j y�k, r p i h �� r irk~. �•�F t'S r� ! I�FrY1 a ,. t r tir 4M Y'M �i y � y w F ✓ �u ,1, Remaks by F. M. Flynn before Southold Town Board of Appeals - 12/19/89 Prr�" Re: Port of Egypt Application for Variances Gentlemen: I intend to read my remarks so that there is no question of the accuracy of the transcription of myg as they appear in the record of this proceeding. I submit that a vote on whether to reopen the hearing on this matter is begging the question and not in the public interest. This Board, if it recognizes it or not, is confronted by a Hobson's Choice. For any unfamiliar with the expression, it means no &4oiee at all. Under the law you have no alternative but to deny this application r Minyiniw' or summarily. To do otherwise cast doubt-A n the competence-@: integrity of the Board of Appeals and of the Town Board of which it is a creature. The same may be said of the Planning Board which reviewed a plan which is in direct conflict with the provisions of Southold's Zoning Code. Unbelievably, this same Planning Board issued a Negative Declaration for a plan which, if approved, would have a devastating effect on the environment. The only real question is why the Board 6f Appeals has temporized so long. Even a cursory examination of the subject application should have resulted in its peremptory rejection. We stand on the verge of entering, the last decade of the twentieth century. Southold is no lonr;er a fiefdom where variances can be given like lollipops to a favored few. Southold, unless I am mistaken, is located in the State of New York and subject to its laws. Case law on zoning, and more particularly on variances, has become well establihed over the years. This is as well might be since the New York State Enabling Act for Town Zoning admonishes that the power to grant variances is to be "sparingly used in rare circumstances." This admonition has been ignored cb`spiculously in the Town of Southold. In the subject instance, it is all the more pertinent in view of the recently adopted Zoning Code. Further, an applicant seeking; variances must submit convincing proof of hardship or practical difficulties. These are terms with legal meanings and are not matters for subjective interpretation. The subject applicant .has submitted no such proof, nor could lie. The courts have held that hardship means financial hardship and that "dollars and cents" proof therof must be submitted. As long as a property has utility and value there is no hardship under the law. Case law specifically states: "llardship is not established by proof that a variance will enable the applicant to operate an existing business more profitably." This alone negates the obvious thrust of the applicant's argument. As for practical difficulties or unique circumstances, they do not exist except as a fancied impediment to a plan to exceed the building coverage permitted by the Zoning Code or to maximizing the applicant's profits. The powers of the Board of Appeals are circumscribed in the Town Code. It is permitted to vary the " strict letter of these regulations", i. e. the Zoning Code. I submit that to abprove the subject application would entail the abandonment of the entire alphabet. The duties of this Board also include the preservation of the public safety and welfare. These considerations, alone, provide obvious grounds for denying the subject application. Hation-wide studies of zoning decisions reveal that the most egregious acts of Boards of Appeal involve their violation, as unelected officials, of legislative enactments. The scope and magnitude of the variances sought in the subject application are such as to make a mockery of (2) the Town's newly minted Zoning Code. To gr9nt them goes far beyond the Board's purview. Now to address the substance of this application. It represents a flagrant attempt to circumvent and flout the Zoning Code. It can best be described, in simple, direct terms as an attempt to cram ten pounds of sugar into atiive pound bat;. 7h e re js h o q vro ?�io/i fAB GPA�E9nf hoy' C'�ocgJ vF'/d.��i Ca.nP�, w,,Y%l L6c 6', .The extent of the variances sought necessitates the use of the old Gaelic term, chutzpah, to do justice to the effort. First, under the Town's Zoning Code, the applicant has, at most 1049920 sq. ft. of upland available for marina operations. The Zoning Code permits 30% coverage, or 31 ,476 sq. ft. of buildings. Existing marina structures total 46, 185 sq. ft. Thus, the existing structures exceed the coverage permitted by the Code by 14,709 sq. ft. The existing coverage i!S is 147% of that permitted by the Code. Approximately 499030 gq. u�/ila•v�Sy ft. would be required to accommodate the existing structues in conformance with the Code. Even the existing coverage is nen conforming. A stated objective of the Town Code is the gradual elimination of non conforming properties, not their proliferation. To a densitywhich already exceeds the maximum permitted, it is proposed to add 31 ,490 sq. ft. of improvements. Even adjusted for proposed demolition, the total of 74275 sq. ft. of buildings would be more than double the coverage permitted by the Code. The proposed complex would require, at 30% building coverage alone, 247,583 sq. ft. of upland, or 142,663 sq. ft. more than is available for marina operations. Proposed coverage would represent 236' of that permitted by the Code. Second, the applicant has arbitrarily reduced the Code's requirements for docked boats by one-half, and by three-quarters for boats in rack storage. Such a change in parking requirements is no mere variance, but requires a legislative change in the Town Code with the attendant public hearings. (3) Code requirements for the project dictate at least 386 parking spaces, or 135, 100 sq, ft. The applicant proposes to provide 145 spaces. The resultant shortage is 241 parking, places, or 84,350 sq. ft. This shortage for parking alone is 1.94 acresf qc . This entire parking issue is a smoke screen,or red herring. It represents an attempt by the applicant to divert attention from the fact that such an arpendment of the Zoning Code would permit him, and other marina operators,to launch as many as four times the number of boats into the already imperiled Peconic Pay as is currently permitted. Third, no provision has been mane for the 20% landscaping required by the Zoning Code. Fourth, my analysis indicates that to conform to Code requirements, this project would require approximately 3.6 additional acres of upland , To put into'perspective the outrageous nature of the variances sought, the applicant seeks the additional utility of 1 112 times the acreage that he actually has available for marina operations under the provisions of the Zoning Code. Fifth, front and side yard variances are sought purely to increase the profitability of the owner's operations. The specious reasoning behind the front yard variance sought is because his other main structure is non conformoing. The basis for the side yard variance has even less validity. Sixth, consideration of the public's health, safety and welfare are, or should be, paramount in the Roard's considerations. It is proposed to erect a monolithic structure�housing.160 or more fuel laden boats within 5 feet of an abutting; property line and in close proximity to a State highway, What would happen if the neighboring property owner sought a a similar variance for which you have set Wee precedent? Or suppose the neighboring property owner merely exercised his vested right to build a similar structure within thirty feet of the one proposed? What would be the problem of accessibility for emergency equipment in the event of a conflagration? toy By what the marina owners apparently interpret as a God-given right (it is certainly not a right granted by the State of New York) they have incorporated State Route 25 as part of their operations by freely transporting boats and equipment across the highway by truck, fork lift and travelift. It has also been suggested that additional marina pang parking be located on the north side of the highway creating aditional vehicular and pedestrian traffic. This along an already heavily travelled highway lacking traffic controls, curbs, curb cuts, sidewalks, pedestrian crossings etc. Granting, this application would set a precedent for similarly increased traffic throughout the Town with devastating effects, particularly on residential areas. To srumnarize to this point, approving this application would constitute the Board's making the applicant a gift of the utility of, and hence, the value of approximately 3.5 acres of commercially zoned waterfront upland. In addition its pernicious influence would be felt throughout the Town. The character of the Town would be permanently altered for the worse by making provision for launching several thousand more boats with increased traffic hazards, demands on our limited utilities etc. It is a travesty that the applicant has, by his letter of November 8, 1989 to the Roard, hu-moire anarea of upland ownership reduced from that previe"sly stated to the Board and other governmental agencies. I repeat that by so doing he has invalidated his entire application process. Further, even if such a claim were true, the same principles and similar calculations would obtain. In short the entire application represents an outrageous attempt to rezone his property Jia variances; an obvious direct conflict with zoning law. As a point of personal privlele, I would now like to disabuse the Board of of any impressions it may have garnered regarding me and my analysis from r1r. Lieblein's letter, of November,8th. Regardless, of Hr. Lieblein's impression that I consider him, and all marina operate to be sly, sneaky and devious, I would like to state that I have had a personal interest in marina operations and I prefer not, to think of myself in those terms. As in all field's, there are good and bad operators. This is really a subjective matter for the public to decide. Such a poll would produce some interesting results and I'm sure.at leo✓e (5) some of the operators would match Hr. Lieblein's rather florid characerization. I'm sure all business men, myself incuded, are profit oriented. The issue here is the question of increased profitability as the basis for granting variances._ The law is perfectly clear in its dismissal Of such grounds. As for the ownership of the motel property, Mr. Leiblein includes it in the description of property owned or controlled by the Port of Egypt In his submissions to the Board and other agencies. I might add that he has personally listed the property for sale with various real estate brokers. I state again, to deny ownership now is to negate his application. My comments regarding the tax exempt status of the motel property hardly constitute a "zini,er". [dere you to consult Southold's Tax Roll it is indicated that the property is tax exempt. Parenthetically, some of Mr. Leiblein's property zoned M II is carried on this roll as vacant residentially zoned land. In any event, the motel property's tax exempt status was confirmed by my inquiries of the Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency. Mr. Lieblein, perhaps inadvertently, confirms this by referring to a payment in lieu of taxes. His payment represents a partial payment of total taxes and refleects the exemption of taxes on the value added by funds advanced by the IDA. An interesting question arises from this state of affairs. If the IDA were to advance the funds for the proposed new construction, would it not be, in its entirety, tax exempt? My reference to "demons6ble demand" was abstracted from the Marina A Criteria subscribed to by New York's Deparment of State in connection with its Coastal Management Program. Mr. Lieblein conceeds some vacancies. The same is true of other marinas in the Town. Demonstrable demand mustbe considered on a Town-wide basis. Surely the Board is aware of marina expansion and new construction inthe Greenport area. Certainly 4 this has bearing of the question of foreseeable demand. Mr. Lieblein has conceeded that only 25" of marina capacity in the TDwn -24'W occupied by Toim residents. This means that 75" of the Town's current marina ca2acity is occupied by non-residents, Even at the projected full development of the Town's population, 50, of the current marina capacity would -4�/ be available to no"-residents. This brings up the inevitable question (6) of how much are we, as a Torm, expected to contribute to the further dogaradation of the Peconic Pay Eztuarine System? Further, how much of the Town's quality of life,and the health safety and welfare of its people, _ are to be sacrificed for non-residents. Mr. Lieblein insults the intelligence of the Hoard when he states that only 300 sq. ft. of ground area is needed to block and store a 30 foot boat. Boats are not stored like coins in a wrapper. In the first place, few modern 30 foot boats have a beam of only 10 feet. Regardless of L'AAt this fact, it has to be conceeded n,space has to be provided on both sides of the boat and at its stern. If we allow a modest 2 112 feet of clearance on each of these sides, we have a net ground area of 488 sq.ft. occupied by the boat alone. This is , obviously, the equivalent of almost 1 112 parking spaces. Overlooked in Mr. Lieblein's calculation is the requirement for maneuvering area betwe6n boats for equipment to place the stored boats. In the case of the Proposed new storage building, approximately 80 feet has been allowed for this purpose. Allowing half of this width per boat results in a requirement of an additional 500 sq. ft. of ground area per boat. Thus the total is 988sq. ft. per boater ar" Z.S /'s• /r•. Y ��r.=s Fly mental calculation was not far off the mark, particularly if boats in excess of 30 feet in length are to be stored. As proof of my contention, in the matter of Young's Marina, with which the board is familiar, the owner concegds an upland area of four acres is required for 138 boats. This translates to 1263 sq. ft. per boat. Mr. Lieblein advances the argument that additional boats can be stored, pr•esumeably in the aisles. This raises the question of accessibility, particularly in the event of an emergency. Also unaddressed is the question of the additional parking required for the additioal boats. And so on ad infinitum. fir. Liblein also states he can store boats four high in the proposed Wilding. He has also stated he can store boats in the center aisle of the building,. flow many boats does he really intend to launch into an already overcrowded Rudd's Pond? Would not the other neighboring marina operators petition for similar variances? (7) The number of parking spaces constitutes the only effective control the Town has over the number of boats to be launched from a given site. In 11r. Lieblein's case he proposes to accommodate a minimum of 362 boats on a 2.4 acre site, or 151 boats per acre. This in a Town that professes a desire to restrict development by zoning residential lots to 2 acres. '.•lith further respect to parkitng, the requirements of the Code are clear. Variances of the magnitude sought are beyond the purview of the Board of Appeals. Even a reapplication with a change in the parking plan by including parking on the north side of Route 25 would not obviate the shortfall in parking spaces. It would, however precipitate the safety and welfare problems previously discused. Further the parking issue has no effect the question of the maximum building coverage permitted by the Zoning Code. Unbelievably, Mr. Lieblein has based his arbitrary parking plan on surveys conducted in Australia and on Puget Sound. I would suggest the Board investigate the requirements of neighboring communities which share the Peconic Ray as a common resource. 11ore particularly, the Board should investigate the problems with parking for rack storage In the Village of Freeport. I am heartened thatf1r. Lieblein concef.ds that he was un successful A in analyzing my calculations. They are really quite straightforward. Perhaps he meant he was unsuccessful in countering them. fir. Lieblein introduces some area calculations made by Mr. Van Tuyl intohis argument. Mr. Van Tuyl is a reputable and competent surveyor. However, in this, as in similar instances he serves as a technician. {ie makes the calculations he is instructed to make. It is obvious he has excluded Lot 3.4, the motel site, from his calculations of net upland area area in the ownership/control of the Port of Egypt. This is clearly in conflict with previous submissions by the applicant. Even if one wer^ to disregard this obvious flaw, the applicant has not materially altered altered confrontation by the basic questions of coverage and parkin;. (81 Mr. Van Tuyl's land area calculations for Lots 4 & 6. 1 coincide rather, closely with mine. Mr. Lieblein makes reference to the basin. Actually there are two basins. Perhaps it is coincidental, but if the area of the second basin is deducted, my area calculations are within 120 sq. ft. of Mr. Van Tuyls. In claiming, an area of 215,058 sq. ft. as available for marina operations, Mr. Leiblein disregards the Code requirement of 80,000 sq. ft. for the restaurant. I would also point out to the Board that the area covered by rtr. lieblein's lease to the restaurant has no bearing on zoning requirements. As for the calculations of building area, I don't know what buildings Mr. Van Tuyl was asked to calculate. Obviously, his calculations of building; areas and percentage of coverare differ from mine. I can only state that my calculations were made, in large part from t1r. Van Tuyl's survey of the subject property. The rest were made from Peconic Associates' Plot Plan. r1r. Lieblein poses the question as to why I considered the concrete washinm pads as a building. Perhaps this accounts for part of the discrepancy in bu and loot coverage calculations. The basis for my includingthe washing pads is obvious to anyone familiar with the Southold Zoning Code. .Section 100 - 13 defines "Building", in part, as: "- - also any combination of materials forming, any constuction except when entirely underground so as to permit the use of the ground above the same as if no "buil4hrig" was present," (emphasis supplied) It should be noted that the elimination of these pads would be contrary >to DRC requirements. Finally, with respect to Mr. Lieblein's letter, he refers to the proposed lease of 9240 sq. ft. of State land. Having served as a consultant to the Attorney General for many years, I doubt that the State "requires" anyone to lease its land. Nevertheless, any lease does not confer title and is of a transient nature. Thus, it cannot serve as a basis for increased building; coverage. (9) It appears I have come full circle. I believe I have proved that is possible for an applicant to use calculations for support, but, not necessarily, for enlightenment. Perhaps the ultimate irony inherent in this application is the grandiose promise of economic benefit to the Town. In exchange for the destruction of the Town's natural environment and its quality of life, Mr. Lieblein is ogrecord that his project would provide exactly two extra jobs. In conclusion, the actions of Town amencies in this matter give rise to the suspicion that we, the ordinary residents, are confronted by a "done deal". I must express my resentment, as a private citizen, that I have had to prepare the type of detailed anaysis that it is the Board of Appeals duty to perform. The law is clear. The calculations are simple. The conflicts with the Zoning Code are self-evident. If the Board is unable, or unwillinr?, to perform its duties in a professioal, unbiased manner, I would suggest it resif-n. Such an action on its part would allow the new Town Board to appoint a Board both willing and able to act on behalf of the Public at large. ( 10) �ti �o5�FF01k11_ OCT 171984 o �� Southold Town Board of Appeals cif ' - •�� MAIN ROAD - STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN CHARLES GRIGONIS, JR. SERGE DOYEN, JR. October 1 1 984 ROBERT J. DOUGLASS JOSEPH H. SAWICKI Allen M. Smith , Esq . Tooker and Smith 1380 Roanoke Avenue Riverhead , NY 11901 Re : Appeal No . 3298 - Port of Egypt Enterprises Dear Mr . Smith : In reviewing the recent application and site plan dated July 19 , 1984 , filed with our office October 9th , the board has requested the following information before we may proceed with this application : 1 . Site Plan to be corrected to include the following : (a ) setbacks of all proposed buildings and buildings to be retained on site from all property lines and bulkheads ; (b ) dimensions/size and sales and office areas in square footage of all buildings ; distances of road frontages ; actual lot lines as shown on survey ; deletion of areas not under consideration ; (c ) all other elements listed under Article XIII , Section 100-134 (A ) , (B ) , (C ) , (D) [copy attached for reference] ; (d ) parking areas shall be screened as approved by the Planning Board as well as site plan (preliminary ) approval , which is required for any use in a commercial or industrial zoning district [Article XI , Sec- tion 100- 112 (J ) [5] . 2 . Six copies of a topographical survey of all premises involved in this application and lowest floor elevations above mean sea level ; 3 . Comments or approval from the Suffolk County Health Department ; 4 . Comments , approval or letter of nonjurisdiction from the N . Y . S . Department of Environmental Conservation . V' 0Vx\$1 Page 2 - October 17 , 1984 Allen M. Smith , Esq . Re : Appeal No . 3298 - Port of Egypt Enterprises We would recommend at this time that the site plan be submitted to the Planning Board and the Building Inspector for review and/or certification as required under Article XIII , and for review under the Floodplain Management regulations , Chapter 46 of the Town Code , since additional variances may be needed . Upon receipt of all of the information listed , we will be in a position to proceed with this application accordingly . Thank you for your anticipated cooperation . Yours Ive_ry truly , �"�� GERARD P . GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN lk cc : Planning Board Building Department Enclosures i• in i 1 I I Lw The Leader in PRE-ENGINEERED — RACK pG;VW l as IMMBOAT RACK STORAGE , � THE HIGHEST QUALITY - LEAST COST ALTE, Coe �M� oresyr RACK STORING BOATS TO 34' LENG TM Dennis W `( (212) 652.3056 P.O. Box 123, City Island, • �y.rr Also NO i w�r- s_ s Model 'C' Building, fully enclosed with shed extension for bigger or longer boats. (VVIN rack store up to 34' performance boats). RAK-W=ARE Standard Building with 1'/12' roof pitch, 40' heighth. i g One of the larger rack storage buildings—330'triple wide, �. •. S s„r racking 425 boats up to 30' length. III - Iwo; 77 tALr • . , ..b��-tel a'. , _ 10 • i f' THE VERY INEXPENSIVE WAY TO BUILD A SALES OR SERVICE BUILDING. j � rw :v {� •�biri'�::y�'�.t�2'%4tieAra'�i ae,». mc$€�� k€.'x' ' �___..--------..-----.`—_____�...w...� I, r, U LFt F, �j1� r ` �f f u . RACK BUILDINGS WITH SALES BUILDING AND 2 FLOOR OFFICE BUILDINGS. MARINE STORAGE, DIVISION OF STEELEX CORPORATION Engineering Services•Pre-Engineered Steel Buildings Rack Supported Buildings P.O. Box 621 0 Rochester Michigan 48043 (313) 652-9552 r Be " Land Safe" with PROFESSIONAL BOAT CRADLES ! i • STURDY, BUT STILL LIGHT ENOUGH TO BE MOVED EASILY • EASILY ASSEMBLED AND $120,000 DISASSEMBLED — NO WELDING This —33 foot Executioner,aswellasafull lineof Searay boats,are entrusted to Marine Storage cradles and • USES THE SAME SPECIALLY rack systems at Shore Marine, Ship Bottom, N.J. DESIGNED BOAT SUPPORT BRACKETS AS USED IN THE MARINE STORAGE RACK BUILDINGS • ALL STEEL, RUST PROOFED r AND FACTORY PAINTED (For Saltwater use, order optional galvanized cradle.) • SEVEN MODELS AVAILABLE — FOR POWER BOAT OR SAILBOAT, A FOR SMALL OR LARGE BOATS ■ UP TO 30', 10,000 Ib. load capacity. You'll benefit from the versatility, whether you're re-positioning boats for storage or using the cradle for permanent storage. Save time, and be "Land Safe". ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS !a --- Q Also available in double and triple wide designs. VIII � ss Typical boat cradling method using angled boat support brackets. Boats rest on flat end of wood stringers. Shown are brackets used in a 4-point suspension method. Brackets may also be used for 4-point suspension or with full length wood stringers. Y E996-Z99 (OLE) 0 E408ti ue6iy0yY JOISN00H • 29 X08 '0'd s6uippng pepod ft Noeg v s6uip ng jeejS pejeeui6u3-aid•seoiAieS 6uueegl5g3 NOIIVROdM03 X3'I331S 30 NOISIAIa `3JtlBO.LS 3NIHVW 'luaw33inbal anlSUadxa slgl laaw of 3utneq lnogipa pano.idde aq Aew s3ulp[!nq 33eiolS aulaeK `s3ulpj!nq aSeaols leoq.ioj SU131SAS (uohuanaid aiy)i.Illutids 3uutnbaa sa3eluenpV salels ul 'laals I[e s! uotlonAsuoD -J0j pap!notd si uotlegluan g'3noigy .IpoJ ani pue Ala;eS -lslxa silos food uagm 3nll3a33a )SOD s3utneS pue S32UIUEAPV Auelnolued s! 0[sap 3uip[mg -suoll!puoa [!os snouen Jo; pap!noid 3uluue[d al!S Pup u3tsop uotlepuno; Ie!o.IdS :pap!no.id su3tsap uooepuno; piepumS su3ls3Q uotlepunoq (3utloaia u:,&o alagl 0p s,euuew Auew) 3ulsinpe uotlonilsuoo-ul pue u0113313s aolaequoo [eool;o uotleutpi000 santleulal[V alts-uo io S.IAuelu3saidw lolociluo /3aleaCl [eJo-I lnO Aq uollanllsuoj uohJnilsuo3 loaltgaae pue s133ul3u.I [euolss3jold p3gpioj -suoimiodo saa[elsgN plonV put! 3utuueld a3eiols leoq {o sloadse snotaen aql ut aouelstsse 31is-u0 sdlall aouau3dx3 amsolaua [In; aanln3 ao3.Ip!noid of pass.Ins pue pou3lsap we su3lsap undo-lwaS sdals [uolwouoa.I ui puudxa io A3UO Q aneS .upis o1 sioafoid 3ulmolle •uotsuedxa anlss.I13ojd lo; apinoid su3lsa(l ueJ A1lielnpotN 'A1!1!qujUoad sl!;oad.IseaiOul put moll gsea azlwlxrw 01 sa[npagos uoneloaidop wnwildo pup s.I3eluenpV uotlumaidaQ ltpaaD xei lu.Iwlsanul [etapaj 3o asn [elluolod wl sap!noid u3tsacl puV lipa{j xey '3uipl!nq ;o loo3 wunbs aad Aul!geP3oid pup .Inuana.i ]Sow a p ioj uo!lez!l!ln aoeds wnwlxey�j 103 papinojd aie saoueaealo 3ulleiado OA[13Z)Jjg naua!oujg AI[eluozuoq pue AI[ealuan palsnfpe A[!sea almb ase suoddns leog 3uumdO wnwlxrW '89'1 3o roto¢{ Aiajes iaqun3 a aneq s[eualew 'spiepuels ISIV of 3u!pi000e 'uotltppe ul -sjoei u! d[uanaun peol sleoq asnea.Iq saptaede:)peo-I tolae3 Ala;es leuoll!ppe j/,OS e g1ln+ sweaq uoddns leoq ap!no.id aM leog anlle,JasuoD 3utlpueg 3uiunp sleoq of a3ewep luana3d of sop!s Iaea gloowS '103 pap!noid Alalenbape aye saoueiealo Awols pup sluawannbaa 3ulpeo-I 'a.ieo wnwtxew ap!nojd slutod uoddns leoq pale[nolea A[[n;a.eo pup slaaloeiq uoddns leoq pal3ue [etoadS a.ieD 1eOg Ietoads •Algenb ut ao!;uoes ou le aG0£ of a/a0Z .Ines Xuw no,( 'la.Ifo.id a[Ogm oq) ao; io 3ulpl!nq a p lsnf io; iaglagM s3utneS lsoD a3ae-1 -s3ulp[!ng a3uols leoq a;es pue a[gelgoid to3 aauauadxa kmssaoau aq1 sap!noid sloafoid mo ui parols sleoq 000'£1 aan0 'uOP -anilsuoo [aals palated Aaol3e3 pup pNooidlsni I[V -AL43ed lualal;;a ouo ui walsXs pup 3utp[wq 33eiols 4m leoq 31a[dwo3 3n11Je3AV aouauadxg pup A1t[eno SuNia'II11g a3ZHOddt1S x3vH ��r����• A �'�• x l $ivies 1 L� a5 ♦. �. spa �4 '� ♦ l' _ 3 r I r THE VERY INEXPENSIVE WAY TO BUILD A SALES OR SERVICE BUILDING. :� ,.n.� 64 11 ( - ,•_�..st��4F :�t%c.}�4°t6,Vkba.lyq�,- - -^4�tK T`b_.n:�--... RACK BUILDINGS WITH SALES BUILDING AND 2 FLOOR OFFICE BUILDINGS. MARINE STORAGE, DIVISION OF STEELEX CORPORATION Engineering Services•Pre-Engineered Steel Buildings•Rack Supported Buildings P.O. Box 621 9 Rochester Michigan 48043 • (313) 652-9552 - s Be " Land Safe" with PROFESSIONAL I BOAT CRADLES! 9 • • STURDY, BUT STILL LIGHT ENOUGH TO BE MOVED EASILY • EASILY ASSEMBLED AND $120,000 DISASSEMBLED — NO WELDING This —33foot Executioner,aswell asafullline of Searay boats,are entrusted to Marine Storage cradles and • USES THE SAME SPECIALLY rack systems at Shore Marine, Ship Bottom, N.J. DESIGNED BOAT SUPPORT BRACKETS AS USED IN THE MARINE STORAGE RACK BUILDINGS • ALL STEEL, RUST PROOFED IT AND FACTORY PAINTED (For Saltwater use, order optional �..:..,t. galvanized cradle.) • SEVEN MODELS AVAILABLE FOR POWER BOAT OR SAILBOAT, FOR SMALL OR LARGE BOATS UP TO 30', 10,000 Ib. load capacity. You'll benefit from the versatility, whether you're re-positioning boats for storage or using the cradle for permanent storage. Save time, and be "Land Safe". i ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS i Also available in double and triple wide designs. 4 �6 I Typical boat cradling method using angled boat support brackets. Boats rest on flat end of wood stringers. Shown are brackets used in a 4-point suspension method. Brackets may also be used for r 4-point suspension or with full length wood stringers. a : . —MV1NOa — i3naOHd 30VUOIS 3N[UVW-X31331S V '989617 ueStiloTW 'AITD asaansaJ. aATa4 aalaaclmil •N b890T mrdols 3NIuvW-XH133IS xvd 213H A + �a s uo e je R lRuaA pue $uT -r -peol Imcl wnwTxew soj pau$hsap ale s$uTpllnq IIF/ •uollaaia pue amlanals aql gloq loj ssal maj )Soa nim s;?uTplTnq a�elolS auliew a.Iojaiag,L •alnjansls palloddns Alaleiedas e olid sslaea leoq $ulllnd uagm aa palunoaua uop eaTldnp lemloruls 6lls0o fiUlWUTurTla alTLim u4TSap jo gl$uails sapinold slgL •ainjaruls fauLu ld aql OIulrualsAs Kaes a�eiols leoq aql alel$aluT su$Ts -;)p s�ulpllnq a$elols leoq lanai-Illnw pasopua IIV Sasea ,Cuew UT IS03 e.rlxa ou le `paplA -o.rd ale amee � lslsse ufiTsap puulurreld ails-u0 •SaaauT$ua xapalS Aq paIJTllaa aae s�uwuap pue SOTsaQ •sjuawa.rTnba.r ,sioleiado euTlew aql - laaw of paufiTsap wolsna sT loafo.rd qmg •paplA -o.rd ale slued mipala pue s$uTmelp$ullaauOiug •Seaie Isow UT paleaol ale (aippiw 841 ui I(ea BGS ,b£ B 8,3841) S1013ealrI03 pazlloglnV •uoTloaps iolae.rluoa .co SW3ISAS mvu a3SSVdunSNn �?uTuueld uoTlaa m uT no6lsisse lllm a$e1olS aupeW SJNimine mvu a3SSVdunSNn •4ulms pue '3uljool `Saaualsej `sjalpuiq alpam leoq jupads pue sweaq a$elols aisle ayl leoq simuodmoo aanlaruls lie $ulpnlouT uop anoge auelo uol OL a tiAea ueo pus sme Iuom -33.I9 1016peaa pue alaldwoa paddlqs pue paiaauT$ pool leulsnpul to sjoog amyl apnpul ueo sBu!pNng -ua-aid a.re s�?ulpling ';)eraols leoq lanal-Tllnw ioj AlleaUToads pau�3Tsap spun laals Tle aie s.2ulplinq •eplM ,OZ of do a$e.rolS au[IL'W :SNOLLdDI3I021dS TV'H3NaD sllplm Aug :sleoq ql 000'£L of do fol segioedeo •pasn aq of IJII Kloj jo aclAj aql pus ainlaruls jo adSl agl `parols aq of sleoq jo ad6l pue sweag puoopoddo noOjmq A reals „seal azls aql '3uTlealpuf `uolleur.roJul 1oJ aIT'm 10 Ilea aseald -uveas„ paplax� snonulluoo aBne6 dneey apinold of Auedwoo Rluo all sl eieNwe Buunpe+nusw 1np •alnpruls a$elols leoq jo adlil gala 1oj algellens aie suoTleoUpads pallElaQ :SNOIJ VOIdI03dS JO 133HS 68-8Z-6 E989S68 03SIA38 S'JNIMOB d0 S31VO b3evinN ONIMVbO 31V0 9NIMVtlO :3lVOS ONI808 lVJlll13A �Q • a •N 'az0Hln0S NoiivoTssami aDvaxnsanS a p a � D j CCCL LLL 9LS ' C4Lll XV0A M3N 'CVOdV31S ' OV01 XDlVN3IW OLLC 8u0i;e6l;9ewUj liosgns 'dHOD ON1771?1a S:)INVH»W 110S •aTogazoq goea 30 uOT40Tdwoo ag} 4e buTsao TTTzp agq apTsuT pazns2aw saM zalaM punoiD 'w94SAS U0T420TJTSSPTD TTOS PaT3Tun ago 144TM pzOooa uT aze suoTl.dTsosap TTOS 'suoTgezado buTTTTzp buTanp pasanOoaz S9Tdwas TTOS Jo uOT}auTwaxa TansTn Aq aza suoTldTaosap TTOS SSION 'MSI! NMO SIH 1V IdOd3b SIH! NO S3113!! NO11VbOdb00 b0 Wtll3'NOSb3d H005 ANV ONV 03NVd3Nd A1103NIC SVM MOM SIH!WOHM NOd 1N3110 3H1 NVHI 83HIO SNOS83d bOd A1I1181SNOdS38 80"IIIBVIT ANV 1d300V10N00 S33AOldW30NV S833NION3Sll'db000NIT11HO SOINVH33INTOS SAVO(9)3nld NIRLIM'0310n03b1dl303hi Nbnl3b'IIVW 031411430 AB ONUIUM NI 'dHOJ ONIIIIMO SDINVH33W 1105 AdIlON 1SnW 1N3110'3T8V1d333V ION 3NV Svom j 3S3H1 :11 IN31o33bOV SIHI i0 30N3SS3 3H1 SI HJIHM All11817I1l0 NOlIVIlWll SIHI NOdn 031V3103bd SI lbOd3b SIHI 80! 0308VHO 334 3H1'b3W IVIOSIO SIHI ziO1N3Il3 3H1 AS 30NV1d300V NV 31nil.LSNOD IIIM 1bOd3b SIHI d0 35n 3Hl'1bOd38 I SIHI 80:1 OIVd 3343H1 JO1NnOWV 3HI 01031IWI1 SI SNOISSIWO ONV SbObb3 NOd'S33AOldW3 ONV Sh133NIDN3 Sll"db00 0141111NO SOINVH03W 1105 !0 kIlll8Vll 3T0S 3H1 1VHI ONIONV1Sb3ONn OId103dS 3H1 HIM 03111WSn5 SI IHOd3b SIHI S H0V31V 0310N'anS'ON9 W08:1 H1d30 - 1334 M3WWVH d01H913M AS C3HSnd - d N38WnN 3ldWVS -ON 3A160 HOW 9 aid SMO'18 NOOdS - BS 3ldWVS 110S 039Nn1SIONn - On 3AI60 1004 12H3d SMO-18 ONIM - 80 0£ S3H0NI `lltl3 U3WWVH P SONnOd '1H013M a3WWVH S3H0N1 'MIS WVS 9NIStlO AAV3H VNIX3 ONIM) AaVIO8lONl„9 OLI£ 9 ONE 3H1 3Sn(N)100d b3d SMOl8 NIV180 01 1004 HU z6 1N3W3a0Nl „9 NI NMOHSAllVa3N39 SllNn00 M018 NOOdSSMO1811=NWtlH4lobl'NoodS„Z)1S31 N0llV813N3d 08VONV1S „ N O£ 0lMVH 38ON NO Ob 3SN3C 1 11 WnIO3W 6£ Ol 9l Wnl03W0 01 1JOS SS3l 8091 3SOOl AV 9 1�IS ONVS 1004 Mad SMO-18 NOUS 01 031V'138 N0110ddW00 1S31 AB S1VIH31VW 9NIUV38 Aa010VdSIIVSNn AIIVNIWON 99 — 11 1531 AB 3SOOl 9' I Wn103W £ 3SN30 (HW 9lW Sdnoug lIOS)SlIOS111S ONV SIIIS 99 —01 IS31 AB 130S (XVWZ) Wnl03W (XVW9) a8vH (HO 9 l0'3S Sdno8o IIOS) S110S AVlO ONV SAVID 99 — 6 b - Z ONUS 3N13 99 - 8 (13AV89 %01 NVH13a0WlON DNINIV1NOO ins 9 -£ WS9dS'MS SdnOMol10S)(SONVS3NIANVH1 b13H10)SONVS 99 - L (I3AV89 %01 NVH13a0W 9NINIVINOO WS9 dS'MS SdnouE) 01 -t, ONV :)99 W9'd9'MO Sdno8E) IIOS)SIIOS l3AV89 ONV -13AV80 99 - 9 61 - 9 — NVdO8VH 99 - 9 8 NOON IdOS 99 - b OZ NOOU 31V103WM31N1 99 - £ Ob H30H 08VH Wn103W 99 - Z 09 ROOM ONnOS ObIVH 99 - I '13'0S/SNOT 1b9 U31dw 9NIUV3e NOIldI80S30 319VM01IV 1 30 SSV-l3 2011- 920 3400*0019 'DWN'S38nSS38d JNl8V39 110S 3-IGVM011t/ SIIOS OINV980 A1HD1H H3H10 ONV 1V3d 4d SI-11S 0INVE)8O'A11311SVId HE)IH Ol Wnl03W d0 SAV-13 OINV980 HO SAVl01V3 'AlIOIISVId H'91H 30 SAV-10 DINV980NI HO SI-IIS OI1SVl3'SIIOS Al-IIS W W a0 AONVS 3NId sn033VINOIVIO Ho sn03DVDlW'S1lIS DINVO80NI I I A11311SV1d MO130 SAtllO AlIIS DINV980 ONV SMS DINV980 -10 1 SAV-10 1.1IIS 'SAVlO AONVS -13 SAV-10 AIl3AV219'A11011SV1d Wn103W Ol MO-1 d0 SAV-10 3INVE)HONI A11011SVId 1H911S'S1lIS A3AVl0'SONVS 3NI3 k83n'S1lIS 31NV980NI 1 W ° ° S38n1XIW kV10-ONVS'SONVS A3AV'13 3S 0 0 _ 0 0 C) S38n1XIW1lIS-ONVS 'SONVS Al-11S VlS 0 0 • • • S3N130N HO311111'SONVS All3AV89 80 SONVS 030V89 A1800d dS • • 0 0 ° S3N130N803l1lil'SONVSAll3AV8E)'SONVS030VM�9Il3M MS 0 0 38n1XIWAV-iD-ONVS- l3AV89 ' Sl3AV8'9A3AV10 00 c r o. 38nlxiW 1IIS -0NVS - l3MA9 'S-11AV89 A1IIS WO V, o11 A° S3N13 ON o a0 3lllll'S3unlxlW ONUS l3AVa°J HO S13AV89 030V89 Al800d dD d. S3N13 ON 80 311111'S38n1XIW ONUS l3AV89'Sl3AV89 030V89 113M M0 q o S109W1.S 110S ONV S3WdN -IVDIdAl Sdf o8g 1IOS NOUVOIJISSC�3 -110Sa31JINn 40 1 Las"` 686 8Z 2139W31d3S L�X8 9 S6807iN7Y :iww..o 911.11 L::G:6806 11 100 S 1 N raNrr w�aa :we :n►x wnm-IW.-KLM " N )480,l M3N 0-IOH.Lnos ®® NOIld911S3nNI 30V=l8nS S lIn9 39VHOlS J- 09 43SOd cl t ase S3Sl6d831N3 Ld k93 d0 la0d a Cees-lee 9le CIRM 111101 AUK '11110AWNS • dVOa smasw Me suoiisSiisewui iiosgns 'db0D ON17718a SDINVH»W 7105 NV-id NOIlV00-1 9NI809 1NV8n'd1S38 9NII.SIX3 OV3HN-in9 'ONOO �— - - - - - - - - - ol � I I r a3HS I 1-9 I x,69 n 9N11SIX3 I 2 9NIa-une I 39V801S 1V06 03SOdOad 0 x ;.6Z I � a3HS 9NI1SIX3 3- 3'I I =,0£ — — — - - — —I o cD 0 �z 301dd0 9NI1SIX3 00'001'13 ltl aawns tl Ntlld 3115 NO we w a310N .3.3 1NVanvii — _ 9NI1S adpa NIVW _ 0lO _ ggg _ 'ON eor Ob- S£ - 0£ - i SZ - OZ - , 01 QNs SI - (59-11) OW) Pugs a-Jsiy 1iFs unolg/6ai0 (59-ll) (ds) 01 6 01 - 288d a3siy %7 puss a3Tgm/6ai0 6 6 (S9-11) (yd) 91 T1 8I S - 3aad unoig 1 Z (99-II) (TT?3) TaARID `ITIS ' Pugs 0 1l 83d 21- 9 9-0 838Wf1N 33tl-' s�UVw38 �08WAS N011dla0S3Q SMOlB 83ldWVS NO 3ldWtlS MO-I 9NIStl� 983d SMO-18 H1d31 . NOUVA313 :918 3dAJ 3Otld8f15 :833N19Ni :80133dSN 83T'118C ON 1808 :31vc H1d30 3WIl 31v0 NOI1VA83S80 831VM ONI1089 Q`IOHmos :NOIltlJOI BOI E8L1,L NHOA AA3N "I "-1 'OtlO3V3S • OVOU N01883W OLLE SNOIIVO1163ANI imse 1S °ddoa SOINVH031N 110S 707 uO -ON eo1 0tl- Sc - 0c - CJ Z 07. E S1 - ,0i axa OI 6 01 L 8 T Z Z S — (59—ii) (TT?3) I s-400H ' x3iig ' TOAUJD ' ;TTS ' pusS Z I OT Zi 9 OT 0 — '13 N3d I ZI- 9 1 9-0 30Vltl(1 SH8vw3a 10SWAS NOIldI8DS3a SMOl9N3ldwVS NO a38wf1N M0136 9NISV7 9l13d SMOIB 3ldW VS N1d3C . NOIIVA313 :DIN 3dAl 30vd Nf15 :N33N19N3 �N0103dSNl :W3llltl0 - - Z # JNIHOS 68/SZ/6 :31v0 N1d30 3wll 31v0 NOIIVAN3S90 u31vM ONf10H9 ,LflOs NOIlv00l BOf ESILL XUOA M3N '"I -1 '080jV3S • OVOU N0I883W OLLE ONDILVOIL63ANI imse 18 °dnoa FgDaTirnona SOINVH09W 110S yuy-Oa -ON 8C)r I OB- I S£- 0£- 9d - , 7T QN8 oz - (S;9-8) Z -(59-8) (ds) TOA1930 001931 ;TTS a0193ycpu19S uMo3H SI - Zi OT (S;9-01) ON) pueS ao193y IT?S unolg/6a30 OI - 8 9 Z (59-11) (•i0) 7 Z S:)Tu19830 a0Ei1 ' pueS a01931 6 9 ;ITS uno3g/La30 L S S - UL • TOAs30 '4T?S ' PUBS 0 - ljN3d 21- 9 1 9-0 30VAH, SNavw38 108WAs N01 id IH DS 30 SMOIB 83ldWV5 NO 838WI1N M013 9NISV0 983d SMO-183ldW VS Hld3 . NOI1VA313 :918 3dAj 30Vd NL15 :833NION: !80133dSN :S311I81 4, „Z , S s - #' JN1809 68/8Z/6 :31VI H1d3O 3W11 311r0 NOIlVAb3S80 V31VM ONf10N9 I O'I0H1f108 :NOI1V001 801 CSILL ANDA M3N I 'I '0803V3S • OVOH N3I883A OLLE SN0llW9ll S3ANl 110S8fl8 i ` °ElMOa F:EDMMOC1F21 SMINVH33W 110S yay-Ob -ON 80f Ob- S£ - 0£ - SZ - , 7T QN8 oz - (59-8) Z -(59-8) (as) T8A919 80911 ITTS aa911epuus UAOSg SI - ZT 01 (S;9-011) ('IMI) pugs aO911 ITTS uMO1g/6a13 17 7 01 - 8 9 7 Z (59-1I) (ZO) h Z SDTug810 aOg11 ' Pugs aO911 6 9 ITTS UAOJUIS810 L S S - (59-I1) (TTTd) ' Tang1O ' ITIS , PUBS 0 - ll 83d ZI- 91 9-0 L 9mm 30v wn S>18VW38 loewAs NOI1dIMDS30 SMOIe k13'IdwvS NO 31dwvS MOl36 9NISv0 9 83 SMOIB H1d30 NOI1vA313 :SIN 3dA1 30vd Hf1S :H33NION3 :tl0103dSN1 ./�L n Q �11311180 ula £ y"� JN1a00 68 RZ/6 :31VO H1d3O 3"11 31v0 NOIIVIM13SBO H31vtA ONL10N9 IQ'(OH1I10S :NOIlv3OI BOf EBLLL NHOA M3N "I 'l 'O803V3S • OVOH H2I883W OGLE SNOILVDIIS3ILN1 IIOSSIIS 9:EDMOa SOINVH03W 710S d EEEZ-Laa (SL5] EBLLL�Nr'tlOA M3N "I 'I 'OHO�V3S OVOU NOItltl3W OLLE poo SOINdMO3W 1108 ONOILVDIL93ANI vason8 D a Vv� o k o4 Q C / rD - 33C Ctub © 7th:• � ., ci.Qc�.a� � r IVa�.e� �J�-o�ita 7 �. l� RU ("7 S �a Po 4�a�u.'F l•J /n) . Q� g4xoQx .r,) v r o _QZn LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPRe Type: Approved Project Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval SCTM # : 1000 - 56.-6-6.1 Project Name: Portof Egypt Storage Building -1992 Address: Main Road Hamlet: Southold Applicant Name: Lieblien Owner Name: Lieblien Zone 1 : MII Approval Date: 11/16/1992 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 11/16/1992 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: SC Filing Date: SCANNED C and R's Home Assoc: DEC 2 1 R and M Agreement: Records Management SCAN Date: x (LLI. .7, d _ _ 1Z._d��— _— li 'YlyMc;. . � �._—_ �,-� a�^yxv`P•.� I I ---- _ O t `4 `,yru�rp I it ;' j III 1 carve t- I ---- - - - - - ---- ----- I -1151-r V -I.IC'-YJ -ICOc� - i -LG;X�.14=-+ -� ' — GuT otF 6✓E.=u__.,� rw, ul -�- ' �� - W m� �✓.l __ _ -- � - � .. - -I� >� � -cYw'�j'.�s'tj-2-TG &t7Y„ ., ,. 4 _ P-Sr- DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS USE . LN LTiMENSI _ . S 'P ns TO THE ARCH:I I - I CpH .I:110N 91IF'ERIN�ILNP[LI —r ''_ YLIUHI I'B VOIILI114 W1111 WURh t V II Y I b BCAI.. ' APPROVED BYE DRAWN BY AT, DRAWING NUMBER /yam i J'r � I / / I I RirE ,I L f•/1 J i .... _ '�- v��r j _�-�_—_ + _ _ _ _ --'_.w.,-.... (�f• TT'+V — _ �— — GI_ICn N :-,.r.y V. .neo•,..,..,.,.. .m�•.�,.a•...,..w,•m,rne.,.n,».•.....a..-�a•.�..,.N�� .—..........». �...........IL..,_"•_-__._... e I - -- r - ti - i i Ri I. , it i 11 .. .' �1r.�� _ �VlrL3' �` �, � o Wim.,✓ I_ - --_ __ - - - - �. I t�W - / j I 4 / , �3j- -IAiy � I II ', r!r-arr 1r7s/e„y I z i rLo" n._- i � - /t" f :- •/ IT 171 6CALE: APPROVED BY, DRAWN BY DATE /T '?'�� REV.. SYt r; DRAWING NVMB6R I 24 Y 3. PRINTED DN NO. IOOON cLDARI•R.NT w se•bJi -r �, _ I � r, n I I a I , , I T, I ' � � � •�n�,�, �¢— SSI�Ar I I I ' I moi^ -_�v�;.r7'or •w• .^r:b.-.✓ 1 I - L I 6 --- p��a_ Give •g. v, --�- � _ o - - 1 - ',..,,tet _...- �,.,•, ,y,r.,)noq ✓ p•. f cv �y 1y! l-l.sl•x 7 E::(C. .W17F; i I '4 Y �,l.Wa Ch ',>J��„�, , ••� y,. 6xGv Ia W �N1`�r.• �_ . ,_ I II c I I I .IL. i , ' Iz _ -- - - -� - - u �r wac, SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN BY DAM ',t REVISE. /Till ORAWINO NUMBER .xv Px�x.m ex xo. iooan auxPxnrt F?-¢T HOLE.. V1' - - I(1 ' _ � -. ��. �irn 4, o f �] fi --- `Koe.v- � IQa Sr— Csss >rG 1-' 9 ,{n 1 I --v-- I t u �•.T c.../1 �r2 1> 1 S L � SFtRdL SialGs '\ N - �� �g t• c 1 T" - '? � ���T �mal� �.c>, Y r I _" \, t I � ••4 d - ', .o � I v 0.. I �rcl _ .x:.�:y.'}r_�_ `- '__— �' T -Ek'� rCE_Gt✓✓ � � I � �`� I 'a - ,�� I S I r 1 '��W 17 �•, n _ _ 7� c � � L [i� SII i �- - . — Pf ',rt 'F"�ii'. '✓T:'> l 'T G .J C-__ P--I I yyluao- 1 ry 1 :Vi Co LD TT TT -19-1 �_ . � .- re CO 1 I I T 1 8 1 N a ` 4 . �{y��` j 'p L,vIST, •N'xtx+v.l4l , Si. } I .I ED � _ 1' t 1 w� -I UJB � - m,' ft- � I _SL4' \J,l LLQ ., ' I .�yt�i°!.',.<..9 VVn N� ((ry�Xi�L• ���r _ I I ` r`>� - .. - __ � Ma I — � ���NR• �_ — — - -111 I I I•'lE��11_ Utz I I I SCALE: APPROVED BY: DRAWN By -- - - "-+' G1 .G.' -7 -'� ..J�. _.lL---•e _- -____ ___-__ _ —_- /._G_.! _>!.K.r _ _ l - V 4, La DATE: REVISED x ,] DRAWING NUMBER .ZY 4 ..'[.. E.IMT[C GN ND. :EOOX CLG11 N11M -TTI I \VONJE� 1 . Jr rca I �'� ' �icE– _ –__.,._I–_ __–.__....._.� �.c,� w., T�t.cJ _– _-- � — — �, C C- � C I � J � I \ ._ I , CI i ' ------------ V1 cl ci C CLI = –( 7- 1 r-� CLIA z t L :t) SCALE APPROVE. MY: DRAWING NRM7 2AX36