Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-56.-6-6.1 (3)
{ SITE_ PLAN _ Presubmission conference (within 30 days of written request) Complete application received (within 4 months of presub. conference) wco� Application reviewed at work session -� (within 10 days of receipt) 1Ni° 0 `� ty Applicant advised of necessary revisions (within 30 days of review) \ Revised submission received Nf° ( rao 1 i"ro, 4K 1 1 Lead Agency Coordination _ sa SEQRA determination nEc DZt - o REFERRED TO: ft /f7lo 3'�,; Zoning Board of Appeals se vsr o N (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees y�,�_z1-1 M l=1 -a 1Building Department (certification) Suffolk County Department of Planning V) Department of Transportation -State ,ro.` ox < N Department of Transportation - County !T ox r4 Suffolk County Dept. of Health ox Fire Commissioners Sent. A" 31-7a Y� Received:- RECEIVED: eceived•RECEIVED: V Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions eoo•� Landscape planrZ Lighting plan %SOS °K Curb Cut approval S 2� 9� pro.` Ox Health approval 0 lJ`�y %� ,ro.` OK Drainage plan ` ox Reviewed by Engineer -7/Z Approval of site plan -with conditions _. Endorsement of site plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection ___.�'"ro'L :J 'R -9 One year review 'I I I i �I TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD j Suffolk County, New York 516 - 765-1801 jv° 3 3 5 8 ill Southold, N. Y. 11971LJ/ 19�i RE LVAD OF; CL.. For—.4 'th T. Ter own Clerk Cash ® Cheek M ' Z (,�J «B7 �• TOWN CLERK i TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Suffolk County, New York 516 - 765.1801 2 96 5 Z ' i i r Southold, N Y. 1197 m w 19 l ItE IVSD OF i iid / era i J ' h T. Terry, To � ler Cash ❑ Check 1 a� J BY I i SII I , !III '' ill N 010 'f0D RSVISED 08/08/1989 sw Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 I APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application 9/26/88 Filing Fee Date Recd New Use_Change of Use Re-Use_Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval ) Other Specify Name of Business or Site PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES. INC. Location of Site ROUTE 25, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK Address of Site, if available ROUTE 25 S UTHOLD NEW YORK - 11971 _ Name of Applicant PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES INC 1 Address of Applicant ROUTE 25 SOUTHOLD NEW YORK 11971 s Telephone 765-2445 " Person to be responsible for Construction WILLIAM LIEBLEIN i' Telephone 765-2445 Applicant' s interest in site-check ane: Owner of Land X Under contract to purchase_ Owner of Fee Title to Land PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES INC. Addresses TI F 95 cnilTunLn NFW YORK Telephone 765-2445 Site Plans Prepared by pFCONTc ASSOC-_ INC. License No. L. MHILL - # 032254-1 Address(yF R(Y171 FC, A I FY, FFNPORT- NFW YORK Telephone 477-0030 Total Land Area of Site 216.058 Sq.Ft. Zone DistrictMARINE BUSINESS II Existing Use of Site MARINA Proposed Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure( s) aw � _sgft._ .675 sgft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure( s) 27.1A TOTAlsgft. sgft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building( s) $ Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) 26 $ Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) 2.6 $ Datum( Specify)U.S.G.S. tEAN SEA LEVEL Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals NO r, Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? NO (SEE NOTE BELOW) If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. NOTE: PERETS OBTAINED FOR FUEL STORAGE ON ADJACENT SITE (APPROVAL DATE 4/2/86) APPLICANT' S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK WILLIPM H. LEIBLEIN bein� duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at �P0ORR11 in the State of New York, and that he is the .owner of the above propel or that he is the ppFCT1 W of the PORT OF EGYPT WEWRISES, INC. (Title) ( Specify whether Partnersh: which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) I owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans' submitted. Signed (owner) Sworn to before me this C_ 4ay of ( s f 19 ` ONE MWNoWpubp $ of!OIM W.4900987 Signed 0jdRod In Suffolk Cowttyy nFx�raJuly13. U\ (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) 1 i i f - -EPLANNNItN)G TO D` S� N.Y. 11971 .,f Southold, ( (516)765.1936 } i APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION ,OF SITE PLAN ( . T Date of Application9/26/88 Filing Fee Date Recd New Use Change of Use Re-Use Extension of Existing Use X Revision_of an Approved Site Plan7_ (Date of Approval ) , . Other Specify jName of Business or Site Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . Location of Site Route 2 outno Address of Site, if available KOM 2b , SOUtnOrT Name of Applicant Port of E n er rises , nc . Address of Applicant Route Zb , boutnoia , Telephone - Person to be responsible for Construction William Lieblein Telephone 765-2445 Applicant' s interest in site-check one: Owner of Land X Under contract to purchase_ Owner of- Fee Title to Land Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . Address Route 25 Southold Telephone - =; Site Plans Prepared byPeconic Associates Inc. License No. L. lUthill - - Address One Bootleg Alley, Greenport, N.Y. Telephone 4 - Total Land Area of Site 94476 Sq.Ft. Zone District C-Light Industria Existing Use of Site marina Proposed Use. of Site marina Gross Floor Area of Existing Structures) 6015 total sgft. sgft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structures) 25440 total sgft. sgft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) 77797 — % Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) park . s aces $ Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) 1 . 1 Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. 6 . 0 ft . (building Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals NO +`. Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk Counts Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site?NO (see note below) If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAI OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. NOTE : Permits obtained for fuel storage on adjacent site (approval date 4/2/86) i APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Elisa. Thomas being duly sworn, deposes n and says that a resides at rigan ine rive , Southold s the ,owner of the above proper' i the State N hat a th . n at of New York and t i P Pe or that he is the ° ' . Searlo- ar of the (Title) (Specify whether Partnershil Port of Egypt Enterprises, iihich is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by -the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed .in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed CiC IdQ. C/ a (Owner) Sworn to before me this day o < 19� ' Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Titley. .: MAMr MrrMNt i DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within 01/4 mile •1 mile Essentialy undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ® ❑ Commercial In ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat In ❑ Hilly Cl ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed i Aro there visually similar projects within: 0% mile ®Yes 0 N •1 miles MYes 0 N •2 miles ®Yes ONO •� miles ®Yes ❑No ' . • Distance from project site are provided for asNsance.Sufiilltute other distances as appropriate EltPOlfaR! 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is 5 to 10 ,000 NOTE: When user data Is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity In which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action Is FREQUENCY Holklaysl Aetivlfy Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Involved In recreational activities ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by, residents ® ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence Q ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 1614.11 .;-84-sr • • 617.21 SEOR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional Information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between visibility Project and Resource (in Mlles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0.1/4 1/4-Va 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A Parcel of land which Is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the national or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 13 Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C9 • The State Forest Preserve? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? N/A • National Park Service lands? N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? N/A • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ at part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? N/A • A governmentally established or designated Interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? N/A • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? N/A • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ • State? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road} ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal?(i.e., screened by summer.foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes 91No 3. Are any of the resources checked In question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ®Yes ❑No 1 2S: Approvals Required: ' 0 0 4 Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes INNo City, Town, Village Planning Board QQYes- ONo Southold Town City, Town Zoning Board ®Yes ONo Southold Town City, County Health Department OYes 12No Other Local Agencies Dyes WNo Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes INNo State Agencies Q9Yes ONO New York State D. E . C. Federal Agencies OYes ®No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? IRYes ONo If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment Mzoning variance Ihspecialase permit ❑subdivision (site plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan Oother 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? C—Light Industrial 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? see attached Alan 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? no change from present — C—Light Industrial S. What is the maximum potential development of the site If developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? QYes ONo 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a r/. mile radius of proposed action? see land use map 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? IRYes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Oyes ®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes tNO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes E)No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes []No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any alverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor a Peconic Associates , Inc ,. Date May 10 , 1988 Signature Title President If the action is in the Coastal Area,and you arevA&late agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 2. Mow much natural material (i a rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONO DN/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONO c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers)will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Yes ZINO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: N/A a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONO 6. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes (JNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 6 ; after project is complete 2 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Oyes CINo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes 13No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Oyes f1No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes PNO Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 12Yes ONO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ®Yes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month I tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? Dyes ONO c. If yes, give name Southold Town Landfill ; location Southold d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Oyes bNO e. If Yes, explain 17, Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes 0No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? ton /month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes bNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes I5NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes ONO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ElYes ONO If yes , indicate type(s) p l get ri r, t h,,i t elf it t i g h r i g 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N /e gallons/minute. 23. Total antic!pated water usage per day 300 gallons/day. ( seasonal - May through October ) 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes 0No If Yes, explain 4 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: CIO-10% 100 % ❑10-15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? Dyes KINo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes WNo g. What is the depth of the water table? _3 ' tin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes LfNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ®No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes C11No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) []Yes 13No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes ADNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? Oyes EkNo 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: N/A a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ®Yes ❑No — water a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? F]Yes ONo b) If Yes, will Improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes nNO 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes (JNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article a of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? Oyes ®No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes ZINo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 7 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 2 . 1 acres initially; 7 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped none acres. d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 16 5 ; proposed 64 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 15 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: N/A One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 45 height; 12 0 1 width; 21 2 length. , j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2401 ft. 3 PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATIO Ff"ared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assistindetermining whether the action proposed may have a significant Of on the environment Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be conside as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiol information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involi new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specif each instance. NAME OF ACTION - Port .-of Egypt Enter rises , Inc . LOCATION Or ACTION onelede Suaw Ad**@@.mwo, W ww cow" Rte . 25 Southold N.Y. 11971 NAME OF APPLICANTISPONe011 BUSINESS TELEPHONE Peconic Associates Inc . — Merlon Wi gin , Pres 7 (516) 477-0030 ADDRESS One Bootlesr Alley CITIP0 STATEZIP CODE N . Y. 11944 NAME OP OWNE11 BI alhn115 BUSINESS TELEPHONE Bill Lieblein — Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc . (516 ) 765-2445 AODNO Rte . 25 cIT7100 STATE ZIP 000E Southold N . Y. 11971 OWFI PION OF ACTION errection of a 25 , 440 Sq . Ft . boat storage building Please Conylele Each QuMlon—Indicate N.A. If not aNBeable A.. She DeWptlon Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban 15industrial OCornmercial OResidential (suburban) ORural(non-farm) OForest OAgriculture OOther 2. Total acreage of project arca: 2 . 1 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 acres 0 acres Forested 0 acres 0 acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres 0 acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres 0 acres Water Surface Arca water 0• � acresacres Unvegetatod (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres �— acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 2 .0 acres 2 .0 acres Other (Indicate types acres acres 3. What Is predominant soft type(s) on project site? £d — Fill Land- n r P d g P d M a t e i a l a. Soil drainage: OWell drained % of site OModerately well drained 20 % of site OPoorly drained 80 % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, Prow many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? .N /A acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Oyes 11NO a. What is depth to bedrock? _ N/A (in feet) 2 14-162 81871-7c � 517.21 >, ` �' NOV 2 5 198$ AGR Appendix A !i State Environmental Cuallty Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT F Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition,many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: Cl Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions al port OF -,4 q . '+– Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signatureof Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 MEMORANDUM TO FILE - 3/24/95 Application did not move ahead to obtain site plan approval FO[,++ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS =� % G< Richard G.Ward, Chairman y x Town Hall,53095 Main Road George Ritchie Latham,Jr. p ' ,! P. O.Box 1179 Bennett Orlowski,Jr. Southold, New York 11971 Mark S. McDonald Fax(516)765-3136 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jl,ae 14, 1993 William Lieblein Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Southold, NY 11971 RE: Port of Egypt retail store for Club Wave Main Road, Southold Zoning District: Marine II (MII) SCTM# 1000-6-3 . 2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Lieblein, A recent request by the Town Trustees for a coordinated review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for an outdoor bar at Club Wave revealed a retail store for Club Wave on your property. The sale of mopeds at this store is not a permitted use in the Marine II District. A certificate of occupancy or a certificate of determination is required from the Building Department for this change of use. The sale of marine related items is a permitted use in the M-II zone. An amended site plan showing this new use and the number of uses on the property will have to be filed. Enclosed is a site plan application for your use. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. aZnce ���/ Ward Chairman. cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector In Charge Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals Albert J. Krupski Jr. , President Board of Trustees RK SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER S ,- SENDER: SUBJECT: } � . ►BAR 519A(3 C* PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS'{ 1SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman � 'y Supervisor � George Ritchie Latham, Jr. �'�111( 011. . . , Richard G. Ward � aru��Y` Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Ins/p/ector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman -3,, '/! S RE: Amendment to Site Plan for Port of Egypt SJS SR 25, Greenport SCTM# 1000-56-6-3. 2 DATE: October 13, 1992 Please review the attached amended site plan for certification. Please note that handicapped parking spaces havebeen added and the provisions have been made for improved access forfire fighting equipment at the northeast corner of the property. If this plan meets with your approval, it is tentatively slated for action by the Planning Board at its October 19th meeting. cc: Gary Fish, Building Inspector RS✓ PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 October 1, 1992 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Tbwn Planning Board Town of Southold Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage Building Dear Mr. Kassner: Enclosed are six (6) more copies of revised Site Plan, Revision Date 8127192, depicting the changes in parking to include seven (7) handicapped spaces and the other site plan revisions to provide access to fire trucks in case of emergency. For your information, our records show that copies of these plans were originally ✓Mac- submitted to you the first week of September. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. � r Merlon E. Wiggin, P .,ME. President cc: Mr. William Lieblein n OCT - 2 PLANNING 6u irf ' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Wei ;ems► 4'.. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward } Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 21, 1992 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 67 Greenport NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage Building for Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM## 1000-6-3 .2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following must be accomplished before the Building Department can certify your clients site plan and final approval can be obtained from the Planning Department: 1. Seven handicapped parking spaces must be shown in proximity to the new storage building using the standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Total parking must remain at 251 spaces. 2. If any outdoor lighting is proposed, a lighting plan must be submitted, or the lighting locations and details such as wattage and shielding must be shown on the plan. 3. The planter on the north east corner of the proposed storage building must be flush with the ground and be passable by a fire truck in an emergency. 4. The three spaces to the south east of the boat wash down pad must be relocated to give access to the fire truck. The enclosed marked plan shows these requested changes. r • If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly yours, fieaz->* ,"Weds Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector a j 1 lY� IfI /✓O Lt1�47F_R.'OR .Sa �i>7 � . ' i � 111 1 .� $u � CtNG GOLOFc hJ n 6y° 1 CONC,FETE Tp t diOTC♦Sf,tZ'�LSIr�/ .. �; i r�" lil + � { r N WA '- ri. EXiST� l1JLi K / 'S. ,. •Qr•. �. I i fi t — TF _ +, aYE7, ?— I t t j co Mi + jP: 'PROPOSED BOAT- STORAq E M 6U1LD1NC� ;� : (FL. ELEV. d � ' ! _ • - ` .fCVERt\!y E. _60�1T 5) _ � 1 `n }� a ?5, 75 6SF a M I �OLOF- z / c0Cc � -rC , s�a8_ _S�oA f 51 - 10 J 1 , oe R�r�xIV WAI( wEc 24' DOORS GR.A.SS t PLA:hT. JA I BOAT STORAq E :. . (FL. ELEV. to.0�} Ij J! A ? 1 If Z5, 37ra GsF At } to N ' j Vt fl �� Su ! _� i • �FFO(,� • ✓ TRUSTEES O� Q SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ti'l' Dy SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Do '� Henry P. Smith W Town Hall John B. Tuthill �,y t'F 53095 Main Road William Cr. Albertson 4j � �a0 P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 20, 1992 3 � F Merlon Wiggin JUL � 19A2 Peconic Associates, Inc. SOUTHOLD TOWN One Bootleg Alley PLANNING BOARD P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Dear Mr. Wiggin; With respect to the attached memoranda from the Town Planning Board please be mindful that any activities within 75' of the bay at this location will require a town wetland permit. As this site is known to be extremely stressed with respect to drainage needs and has been the subject of prior enforcement actions of this Board, the Trustees will likely encourage a very "hard look" at any proposal to ensure that it properly addresses the wastewater/drainwater issue. If we can be of any assistance by-holding a pre-submission conference please contact this office. S' ncere John M. Bredemeyer III President, Board of Trustees / cc: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman Southold Town Planning Board f/ Victor Lessard, Principal Building Administrator William Lieblein, Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSti t . 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward 1 ' �� � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald " P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone 1516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 .July 9, 1992 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Request for site plan waiver Port of Egypt Enterprises Route 25, Southold Zoning District: Marine II (MTI) SCT144 1000-56-6-3. 4 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter of June 26, 1992 , in which you request a waiver of site plan requirements for the conversion of the two-story motel/scallop building to a marina day room and Sea-Tow generator repair and administrative facility. The Board will not grant a waiver for this change of use and the renovation of this building. The Board feels that the area is ecologically sensitive and will require a State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) review of this Type I action. The renovation to the building will be extensive due to it' s current condition. The Board will be required under SEQRA to review all aspects of this proposed project, including drainage and parking. The proposed project will i]_vo require review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. ... �74 If you have ahy questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, ' Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman . cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector P William Lieblein, Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. John M. Bredemeyer, III President,' Board of Trustees ,i r I` ' C= .c PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS rn = SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman O '��u�.' Supervisor � George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ��flf� .0�br Richard G. Ward - ` `� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald �� P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman RE: Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises Route 25, Southold SCTM# 1000-4-10.1, 11 7 13 .2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3.2, 3 .3, 4 & 6.1 DATE: July 27, 1992 This is in response to your memorandum of July 22, 1992, in which you indicate that certification is not possible until conditions of the ZBA hearing # 3770, specifically condition #4 has been met. The Board addressed this condition in that it caused the applicant to place the following note on the plan: "Overflow parking will be provided on another lot owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises located to the North of Route 25, Southold, designated as SCTM# 1000-56-4-10.1" Attached for your information is a copy of New York State Department of Transportation permit # 10-92-0123 . If you have any additional questions please contact Bob Kassner of this office. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS W SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Oy �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald , P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairm4n°l RE: Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises Route 25, Southold SCTM# 1000-4-10.1, 11 7 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 . 2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6.1 DATE: July 22, 1992 This is in response to your memorandum of July 22, 1992, in which you indicate that certification is not possible until conditions of the ZBA hearing # 3770, specifically condition #4 has been met. The Board addressed this condition in that it caused the applicant to place the following note on the plan: "Overflow parking will be provided on another lot owned by Port of Egypt Enterprises located to the North of Route 25, Southold, designated as SCTM# 1000-56-4-10. 1" if n1 JUL 22 +992 i3 PNWGAUNM , NORTH FORK ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL Su6Fic61 Route 25 at Love Lane, PO Box 799, Mattituck, NY 11952 516.298-8880 �G/,���j� July 21, 1992 Southold Town Planning Board o Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: Site Plan Approval Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. The North Fork Environmental Council requests that the Planning Board not approve the proposed site plan for construction of a boat storage building, drainage system, and parking lot improvements by Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. Our opposition to this proposal begins with the Planning Board' s original classification of this project as unlisted and its subsequent issuance in June 1989 of a negative declaration. This site is within a Critical Environmental Area, namely the 500' inland from the Peconic Bay , thus making it a Type I classification under SEQRA. There is a presumption of significance which has been overlooked by all three agencies (the Trustees, the ZBA, and the Planning Board) regarding the cumulative impact on Peconic Bay, Budd ' s Pond, and Hashamolauck Pond. Clearly, a full environmental impact study should have been performed. The Planning Board had its chance to rectify this matter when the plan was significantly changed ir. 1990. At that time the site area was changed from approximately 7 acres, to 4 . 98 acres. Such a revision, together with the later addition of 30,000 sq.ft. on the north side of Rt. 25 for a parking lot, constitutes a significant change which calls for a new EAF and new determination. The Planning Board did not take this opportunity to tare a fresh look at this plan and revoke its negative declaration. The NFEC believes it is not too late to revoke the negative declaration, and requests that the Planning 3oard do so. The potential impact to the Peconic 3ay of additional boats and usage is particularly significant at this time. With the latest reai-irg,=nce of the brown tide, it is obvious that we must be extremely cautious when contemplating any expansion of the existing marina industry in Southold or anywhere else on the Estuary. a non-profit organization for the preservation of land, sea, air and quality of life printed on 100% recycled paper Planning Board, p. 2 In addition to the SEQRA questions that have been raised by this project, there are many other concerns. The size of the building exceeds height requirements, the parking lot does not meet code requirements, the plot coverage is over the permitted limits -- in short, there seems to be a disregard for the provisions of the Town Code in virtually all aspects of the plan. We recognize that this proposal has been pending for several years. However, all three agencies have been told of these problems repeatedly. Each time the agency in question has chosen to disregard the concerns of the citizens of this town. The NFEC is asking that the Planning Board take this final opportunity to protect the fragile ecosystem of our coastline and call for a full environmental impact study of this proposed site plan. Thank you. inda Le Southold Coordi. ator North Fork Environmental Council INSPECTORS P� Victor Lessard o�gQFFO(,�c kK ✓ Principal Building Inspector Q Curtis Horton =� Gyp SCOTT L. HARRIS, Supervisor Senior Building Inspector cz y = Southold Town Hall Thomas Fisher Building Inspector P.O.Box 1179,53095 Main Road • `F p! Southold, New York 11971 GarBuilding Inspector �Ql �a Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 Vincent R.Wieczorek Ordinance Inspector Robert Fisher Assistant Fire Inspector OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR Telephone (516) 765-1802 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Bennett Orlowski, Chairman, Planning Board FROM: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector SUBJECT: Port of Egypt DATE: July 22, 1992 Certification of present submission is not possible until conditions set down by Zoning Board of Appeals are indicated and met. I refer you to ZBA hearing #3770, Condition #4. Please find copy of covenants attached. VL:gar (attachement) cc to: ZBA JUYBOARD SPL Page 6 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1, 1990 ;j RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for a setback from the easterly sideyard at 15 feet and for a setback from the existing bulkhead at its closest point at 38 feet, as applied under Appeal No. 3770 in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC., SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: i 1. That the building be used as applied for boat storage only; .. I 2. That the size of the proposed building be not larger than as applied (203 ' by 125 ' ) ; 3. That the lot coverage not exceed thirty (30%) percent, for all buildings for the entire marina-restaurant site, excluding concrete slabs at 6" or less from ground level; 4. That the parking plan included all properties owned jointly and/or separately to provide for additional parking (specifically the parcel located along the north side of the Main Road in which the applicant has an interest as well as those parcels described, supra) . e2Lx j J"' 5. That it is recommended that the building be of a color neutral to the aquatic surroundings so as to blend in(with the naturals surroundings .) 6. That the setbacks not be reduced to less than 15 feet at the easterly side property line and not less than 38 feet to the bulkhead (to the south) at its closest points at any time. i 7. All roof runoff be retained in leaching basins. � I Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, Grigonis and Sawicki. Absent was: Member Doyen of Fishers Island. This resolution was duly adopted by unanimous vote of all members present. :GERARD P, GOEHRINGER, CHAIR SOUTIIOLD TDWN BOARZD OF APPA i 1 �nrv%= yA n � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ti '" 2 SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Off`. �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward t Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July 22, 1992 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage Building for Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM#1000-56-6-3. 2, 3 . 3 , 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Tuesday, July 21, 1992 . The final public hearing, which was held at 7 : 30 P.M. was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. is the owner of the property known and designated as Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1 and 56-6-3 .2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6.1, located at Route 25,. Southold; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on January 18, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8) , Part 617, declared itself Lead Agency and issued a Negative Declaration on June 20, 1989; and Page 2 Port of Egypt Enterprises, Inc. WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; Be It Therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated July 20, 1992 and September 13 , 1990, subject to the survey dated July 20, 1992 being stamped and signed by a licensed surveyor, engineer, or architect and receipt of certification by the Principal Building Inspector of the plans dated July 20, 1992 and September 13, 1990. The approval is subject to a one year review from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy. All conditions must be met within six ( 6) months of the date of this resolution. Please contact this office if you have any further questions. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector Scott Russell, Board of Assessors 4 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477.0030 Fax(516)477-0198 July 20, 1992 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage Building Main Road, Southold Zoning Distirct: Marine I (MI) SCTM # 1000-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 .2 SCTM # 1000-56-6-3 .2, 3 .3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Kassner: In accordance with your request enclosed are six (6) copies of overall revised Site Plan and three (3) copies of Project Site Plan with Suffolk County Department of Health Services stamp. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. /"I M'errlon E. Wiggi Ph.D. ,M.E. President Enclosures: Per Text & On [# JUL 2 019 ,'-!LD TOWN _'AlfiWG BOAR o�OgpFFO(,�c O o� Gyp PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS co Z SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman �y �`F Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman /�c7 ��S RE: Proposed Site Plan for Port of Egypt Enterprises Route 25, Southold SCTM# 1000-4-10. 1, 11 7 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 .2, 3 . 3 , 4 & 6.1 DATE: July 17, 1992 Please review the attached for certification. �B " • o��gUFFO(,�-BOG w� HARVEY A. ARNOFF SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Attorney y = Supervisor MATTHEW G. KIERNAN �,y `� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Assistant Town Attorney ��l �a� P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD "MEMORANDUM TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Board �— -"� i� FROM: Harvey A. Arnoff, Town Atto�y L DATE: July 14, 1992 SOUTHOLDTO'WN PLANNING BOARD RE: Port of Egypt Marine Site Plan Your memo of July 7, 1992 has been reviewed by this office and the following response is being made: 1 . In order to clarify a possible misconception by your Board, a review of the records of the Town indicate that at no time did the Town Board reject your Board's proposal of one space for four boats in dry storage and one space for two boats in wet slips, but, rather, chose not to take any action one way or another in regard to that proposal. 2. Notwithstanding the above, it is clear from a review of Article XVIIII that "dry rack storage" was not within the contemplation of the framers of that legislation so that, therefore, one must look to the language of the Section for guidance. 3. Section 100-191 of our Code provides, amongst other things, as follows: "Reasonable and appropriate off-street parking requirements for structures and uses which do not fall within the categories listed below shall be determined by the Planning Board upon consideration of all factors entering into the parking needs of each use. For those uses not specified in this schedule, there shall be a periodic monitoring of off-street parking conditions to ensure the purpose of this Article is satisfied." 4. Therefore, your Board has substantial discretion in determining not only the site but, also, the number of parking spaces necess -, project. 0 JUL p AONNING BOARD Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman July 14, 1992 Page 2 5. The fact that the subject premises are separated by Route 25 is also not dispositive of any issues, as Section 100-191 also deal with that as follows: "Any land which is developed as a unit under single ownership and control shall be considered a single lot for the purposes of these parking regulations." It would appear, therefore, that your Board should in some manner satisfy themselves in regard to any anticipated additional pedestrian vehicular traffic across Route 25 and, if it concludes there will be a significant increase, what impact it would have on the project. It would not appear, therefore, that the original coordinated review and consequent negative declaration need be disturbed but, that the Board may now proceed under SEQRA and under the original review applying those standards set forth above. Obviously, should you wish to discuss this matter further, please let me know. 4 --LEGALN0 1 Notice of Public H STATE OF YORK) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that puntumt to Section 276 of the Town ) SS: Lw,a public hearing will be held by COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) the Southold Town Nanning Baud at the Town Hall,Manz Road,Southold. _Q CM (on l Of Mattituck, in New York in said Town on the 21st Said County,day of July 1992 on the question of being duly sworn, says that he/she the following: is Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a 7:30 P.M. Final approval for the site plan for the Pon of Egypt Enter- Weekly Newspaper, published at Mattituck, in prises,Inc.in Soathold,in the Town the Town of Southold County of Suffolk and of Southold,County of Suffolk and r the state of New York,Suffolk Coun- State Of New York, and that the Notice of which ty Tax Map Number. 1000-56-4-10.1, 11 & 13.2 and 1000-56-6-3.2,3.3,4 the annexed is a printed copy, has been regular. &6.I. ly published in said N The property is-borderoNewspaper d on the� I p per once each week north by Route 25 and the Metropoli- for weeks successively, COnzinencing on tan Transportation Authority(MIA); Ju IN on the ML by ArmandoandMadthe�_da Marie E. y of �_ 19 Capps and William H. Ireblein and wife; on the south by Route 25 and Buds Pond; on the west by Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency and Circle S.Power. Any person desiring to be heard on `i the above maser should appear at the Principal Clerk time and place specified. Dated:July C 1992 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING Sworn tq*fore me this (� BOARD I ' Boosted Orlowski,Jr. day Of J v��L 19 ChairmenlT. 7437-IT,Jy9 DOHS pb� N b 6052U8 Slt�c� �f3� ERR Exon"�30,toz3 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ss: STATE OF NEW YORK LEGAL NOTICE ° tE NOTICE OF 'A Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the PUBLIC HEARING Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, NOTICE L3 HiftEBY a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; GIVENtha€mastouttoSeedon and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, 276 of theTowa-Law,apgblic has been published in said Long Island Traveler-Watchman hearing will be .bald. by the once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks Southold TyAsa Planning Board,' at the'Town Hall, Dain Road, al Southold, New York in said successively, commencing on the Town on the 21st day of July 1992 on the quesiton of the following: day of . . . . . �] . . . . ., 19 9L 730 p.m. Final,approval for the she pkat for the fort of Egypt Enterprises,: lna in . . . . . . . ------ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Southold,.. in the -Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and the State of New York.guf- folk County 7A t Map Number 10005&4}O.I, it &'15.2 and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1000-36.6.3.2, 33,4:i$ 6.l• Sworn to before me this . . . . . . . clay of The property is bordered on the o* A.#I ,0Amfo U4nd lbs Metropolitann atim- AWb01 ay 0"A# euvby, AnumdoadLUPAe E.Cappa and Wiiliam14. 1.iablein,and wife; on the;sotslh by Route 23 and Btu1t Pond:on the west by Suf- /z . �J .� �. folk�ountylndusb hDevelop- Notary Public meat Agency and Carole S. BARBARA A. SCHNEIDER Power, NOTARY PUBLIC, Stete of New York Any person desiring to be No. 4806846 heard>oh the shevb matter Qualiiied in Suflolk County shohM sppm4tthe time and Commission Expires PiNga place spWfad. Dated: July 6, 1992 13 1992 BY OIL I$,R=OP'THE ( ' . 4 SOUTHQL0 TOWN ] } PLANNING BOAR[) r N I Bennett Oil1 }�pvski, Jr.Ja• � Plf i �r of pstn�,�.._. Chairman IX-7/9/92(10) • A-1 1K PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 June 23, 1992 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage Building Main Road, Southold Zoning Distirct: Marine I (MI) SCTM # 1000-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 .2 SCTM # 1000-56-6-3 .2, 3 .3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Kassner: As we discussed in accordance with letter of June 3, 1992, enclosed are revised Site Plans showing the curbing as requested by New York State Department of Transportation. Also, as you requested is a copy of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services section of a previous plan in which they stamped "no water or sanitary" , indicating that their approval is not required. Sincerely, PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. 9erllonn—E. Wigg' Ph.D. ,M.E. President Enclosures Per Text cc: Mr. William Lieblein File y r- w O � ryq i Q Li Q 4 . .� `i ^ ' ILJ ' IIIIII 1 �^ o SAI irLL v ; cloy } f _--+<.-,.• � -_jam... - � i ; .. } E ' l - 4i U �o C� o ; Como PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSt r SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman ��^ �, �4",'. �� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward - '' R Town Hall, 53095 Main Road �4 ¢ Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 3 , 1992 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage Main Road, Southold Zoning District: Marine I (MI) S, SCTM# 1000-4-10.1, 11 & 13 .2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 . 2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has received notification of a permit having been issued by the New York State Department of Transportation for curb cut and curbing on Route 25, Southold. Please incorporate the State' s requirements on a revised site plan. Five copies of the site plan showing these changes and the Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval stamp will be required before the Board can proceed with its review. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please contact this office. Very truly ours,, ;;&-I r z r c,n 1 nnett Or owski, Jr; Chairman CC: William Lieblein, Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector PERM 42m 112/91) STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10w92=0123 HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT 1 Permit Fee: Permit No.: $ Insurance Fee: 200.00 Project Identification No.: 10-92-0123 Total Rece;ved: $ 0'00 Estimated Completion Date: Check or M. 0. No.: 200.00 SH No.: Liability Insurance: Pac�wFF Expiring: Deposit Rec. for $: 8229 Disability Benefit Coverage: PoliCf?&17 on f i 1 e / / Check or M.O. No.: 0.00 Dated: Permittee: Estimated Cost of Work Performed in the State Right-of-Way $: Chargeable to Bond No.: 0.00 PORT OF EGYPT MARINE,INC. or Undertaking on File: 58501512 MAIN RD. Workers' Compensation Policy No.: 1$ 18000.00) SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 - att: Lrsw� l Billing Address: (Complete If different from above) Return of Deposit Made Payable eta IIdll'1" f�nt from�grlplites) ggUTHOLD TOWNUnder the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law permission is hereby granted t TO OPEN THE S/S/O RT.25 W/O OLD MAIN RD.,SOUTHOLD FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING ONE 35' NIDE INTERSECTION TYPE ENTRANCE/EXIT;TO INSTALL CONCRETE CURB IN ENTRANCE AREAIALL WORK TO BE DOME IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYS SPECS OR ASOBE) PERMITTEE SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC AT ALL TINES UNTIL COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY NYS,ETC, THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. IN ADDITI N, ANYBODY WORKING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR A HARD HAT AND 1jitskk IIL t 7- County County — Municipality — + n" C FToute k - �� ✓ SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD 25 as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated the ein,•, if required; and pursuant to the conditions and regulations whether, general or special, and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit. Dated at: Commissi ner of Transports on � Date Signed: HAUPFAUGE, N.Y. 05/20/92 ITO F. LENA This permit. with application and drawing (or copies thereof) ak placed in the hands of the contractor before any work begins. `-FX('iL9100.� NOTICE: Before work is started and upon its completion, the perrniftee absoiutely must notify the Resident Engineer, L 371 CAA�RLTON AVENUE UPON COMPLETION OF WORKt�Z IE FOLLOWING WILL BE COMPLETED %NkSL9'FIfl-IL EX9%E!4Mib DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this Permit was completed on DATE Refund of deposit or return of bond or reduction of amount charged against bond or deposit on file for this permit whichever is appropriate, is requested. DATE PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT(If Any) Upon acceptance of work performed as satisfactorily completed, the Resident Engineer will sign the following and forward to the Regional Office. Work authorized by this Permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted (Reverse side of this form must be completed). DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box checked. To: HIGHWAY PERMIT SECTION: �] Refund of Deposit on this Permit is authorized. ❑ Return of Bond furnished for this Permit is authorized. EJ Amount charged against Bianke; Bond for this permit may be cancelled. ❑ Retain Bund for future permits. DATE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER The issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit, at its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permittee will cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto until all work under the permit is satisfactorily completed, In accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from d/ work performed pursuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. / Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way, authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporation. municipality, or state department or agency, and his or its successors in interest, shall be responsible for the maintenance an+ repair of such work or portion of such work as set forth within the terms and conditions of the work permit. t �u6�iG PP `KK ✓ ✓5 February 12, 1992 EET:OWN � Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates Inc. PLANNING BOARD One Bootleg Alley Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Marine Route 25, Southold Your December 17 , 1991 Submission SCTM No. 0500-173-23.2 This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. As discussed with Mr. J. Lentini of this office extend the proposed concrete curb installation to the west to the (westerly) utility pole #440 . 2. The improved shoulder section will terminate at the full depth asphalt cross section within the Old Main Road intersection. The easterly terminus of the project limits description is approximate. It will be verified by the D.O.T. inspection representative during construction. 3 . The area on the east side of Old Main Road must also be cleared of debris, rocks, posts, signs, etc. 4 . Attached for your use is a marked plan of this site. Resubmission of revised plans must be identified as revisions and must refer to our case number. Failure to provide this information will delay the processing of your permit. I Mr. Merlon E. Wiggin February 12, 1992 Page 2 Prior to issuance of a Highway Work Permit you must submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond ( sample enclosed) . It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by either submitting a completed Perm 17 , Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed) , or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York" ) : $200.00 Bond Amount: $18,000 Insurance Fee: $100 .00 Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to J. Lentini at (516) 360-6020 . The permit fee and bond questions should be directed to me. Sincerely, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer Attachmen cc: ennett Orlowski Jr. William Lieblein VFL:JL:JS 5i( i( PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. RK Gy/ Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 November 25 , 1991 Mr . Vito F. Lena State of New York Department of Transportation Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge , NY 11788 Re : Case No . 89-119 Port of Egypt Marine Route 25 , Southold Dear Mr . Lena : In accordance with your earlier correspondance and sketches , enclosed is drawing depicting the proposed curbing at the two entrances at Port of Egypt Enterprises . Please review at your earliest convenience so that we may submit same to the Southold Town Planning Board , which , as we understand , is the only item remaining for a final Planning Board review. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC . ��, f+�erlon E . Wiggio34 . , D. , M. E. President Enclosure cc : Mr. William Lieblein Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board File [ � ' � MEW/iw OV2 6 0 cn1lTNnl n TnWN 1 I O V N _ 1 ci 1 t Ul I x r L w Q w - b r I X4! a 14 1 l � P � w ,s 7 v ,�, i � It • . � Q � J f ' I I 1 fit. 11 � co L7 1 1 + I v 14 t1i cc \OyfL �� �mmd w b `� ooa `'o.h`J' i i o Is ; g � � day t } O 121 1". I LQ 41 LL CD j QO O ' li am j x cy l ole PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. GyI Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 November 25 , 1991 Mr . Vito F . Lena State of New York Department of Transportation Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge , NY 11788 Re : Case No . 89- 119 Port of Egypt Marine Route 25 , Southold Dear Mr. Lena : In accordance with your earlier correspondance and sketches , enclosed is drawing depicting the proposed curbing at the two entrances at Port of Egypt Enterprises . Please review at your earliest convenience so that we may submit same to the Southold Town Planning Board , which , as we understand , is the only item remaining for a final Planning Board review. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . "Merlon E . WiggiQ,,.-h . , D. ,M. E. President Enclosure cc : Mr . William Lieblein Mr . Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board ra File MEW/iw 26iGA IUI In mWN �S /;K — Fye September 18, 1991 Mr. Merlin Wiggin Peconic Associates One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Gentlemen: Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Marine Route 25, Southold Your June 28, 1991 Submission This is in reference to the site plans for the above noted project which were submitted to this office for review. Prior to the issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: 1. The proposed concrete curb installation shall be offset ten feet from the white edge line on Route 25. The curb installation is to terminate at utility pole no. 440 on the west end of the site. 2. Reduce driveway width to 35 feet. Provide a 20 foot curb radius. 3. Install traffic bearing asphalt within the driveway for the full width of the shoulder as shown in the enclosed sketch. Show this pavement detail on the plans. 4. Rebuild the shoulder for the full frontage of this site. 5. Curbing should be installed on both sides of the Old Main Road intersection. Install a 20 foot curb radius at this intersection. The utility pole on the east side of the intersection may be impacted. Show this utility pole on your plans. rSOUT 2 0HOLD 7n NINf Mr. Merlin Wiggin Page 2 September 18, 1991 6. Traffic bearing asphalt may have to be installed within the Old Main Road intersection. We will take pavement samples at this location and advise you if this pavement restoration is necessary. 7. The area between the proposed driveway and Old Main Road must be cleared of rocks, debris, posts, etc. We recommend regrading and seeding of this area. S. Attached for your use is a marked set of plans. Resubmission of revised plans must be identified as revisions and must refer to our case number. Failure to provide this information will delay the processing of your permit. Prior to issuance of a Highway Work Permit you must submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee, surety bond (sample enclosed) and a completed protective liability insurance form (PERM 17 enclosed) . You must comply with Option A of this form. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York" ) : Not applicable at this time. Bond Amount: Not applicable at this time. Any questions pertaining to the review of this site plan may be directed to James Lentini at (516) 360-6020. The permit fee and bond questions should be directed to me. Sincerely, VITO F. LENA Regional Permit Engineer cc: Vennett Orlowski, Jr. William Lieblein VFL:JL:BT Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS p`� ,,� SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman !' O .fi '. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward jz, � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 August 15, 1991 William Lieblein Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage Route 25, Southold Zoning District: Marine II (MII) SCTM# 1000-4-10. 1, 11 & 13. 2 SCTM# 1000-56-3. 2, 3 .3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Lieblein: This letter will confirm the current status of the above referenced project. As discussed with staff member Robert Kassner on the telephone today, you are waiting for a response from Mr. James Lentini of the New York State Department of Transportation to the plans you recently sent him. When agreement is reached with Mr. Lentini, and permits are obtained, please send the revised plans to this office so that the Board may continue with its review. If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Merlon E. Wiggin, Peconic Associates, Inc. To: Southold Town Planning Board �8 From: F. M. Flynn Re : Port of Egypt - Proposed Site Plan Date : February 18 , 1991 0281991 Copies to : Town Board , Town Attorney This memorandum summarizes my opinion of the legality of the town's review process prior to the submission of the subject site plan to the Planning Board. It also points out the numerous areas when said plan is in direct conflict with both the letter aq intent of the Town Code. My comments are based upon my anal is town records and the data submitted to dateto-,date , and of the actions of town Boards and other agencies with respect thereto. From its inception, the entire history of this application has been so replete with misrepresentation, misinformation , conflicting statements and missing data that, taken together, n they make a mockery of the Southold Town Code. In fact , the actions taken by other town agencies, prior to this stage of the review process, so far exceed the powers delegated to them in the Town Code as to give rise to questions of motivation. These actions also totally ignore the provisions of New York State 's Coastal Management Program and its related Marina Criteria. To approve this site plan subsequent to the legally questionable actions of the Boards of Zoning Appeals and Trustees would have the cumalative effect of circumventing the Town Code and rezoning the property by dubious means. The entire application process, culminating in the submission of the subject site plan, is an implicit insult to the competence and/or integrity of the Planning Board. Since both the Planning Board and Board of Appeals are appointive bodies , and serve at the pleasure of the Town Board , there is no way the Town Board can avoid ultimate responsibility for your collective actions . While it is difficult to single out the one most egregious action in the travesty which has characterized the review process to date , in my opinion it is your Board 's issuing a Negative Declaration for the original project . You will note I state the original project. The Environmental Assessment on which you based your decision, and its attendant prliminary site plan, do not correspond to the plan now before the Board. As a result , the various agencies involved, including those of the State , have not been fully and properly informed as to the nature and extent of the project now before the Board and of its environmental and related effects . I need hardly point out that , amomg other things , the site area listed in the Environmental Assessment has now been drastically reduced , thus increasing the relative impact. In exchange for this deletion, it is proposed to introduce a far smaller, noncontiguous parcel which was not incorporated in the Environmental Assessment or in the original site area computation of seven acres. The boat count, which is criical to the legality of the site plan depends , is significantly less than that reported by other sources. You now have before you a new plan which dictates a new application and Environmental Assessment so that all agencies involved may consider its effects. This would afford the Board a, perhaps welcome, opportunity to revoke its Negative Declaration. That the Board hould ever have issued a Negative Declaration defies reason. To suggest that the construction of a new 25 , 375 SF building, plus related structures, on an already overimproved, nonconforming property, and to launch a large number of additional boats into an already crowded Budd 's Pond , has no negative effect on the environment , borders on the ridiculous. The obvious effects on public health, safety and welfare have ben disregarded . The introduction of additional parking on the northerly sie of Rte. 25 introduces obvious safety problems. At this point Rte. 25 is a curving, two lane , heavily traveled State Highway and serves as a major east-west traffic artery for the town. There are no curbs or sidewalks , no curb cuts or driveways , no traffic controls and no pedestrian crossways . The marina operators have, as a direct result of the town 's actions , incorporated Rte. 25 into their operations . THey routinely transport boats by travelift and forklift across the highway as well as heavy equipment and supplies . The introduction of a large building housing as many as two hundred fuel laden boats , presents the potential for catastrophe, particularly in close proximity to places of public assembly, i. e. motels and a restaurant. This is a clear hazard to public safety. I would also point out that this is not a matter which can be treated by the Board on a piecemeal basis. That is , , (2) you cannot approve approve certain parts of the plan and leave other parts for later determination by you or other agencies. To do so would exclude the requirement for consideration of overall impact . What follows is a point by point critique of the plan itself and the reasons the application does not comply with the SEQRA process . I am prepared to explain and defend my reasoning and calculations to your technical staff at its convenience. Non Compliance with SEQRA Process Original Site Area in Environmental Assessment 1 ) The site under review is not the site on which the Board issued its Negative Declaration, nor is it the site which was described in the Environmental Assessment furnished to the various agencies involved , including those of the State. 2) The total property was described in the Environmental Assessment as being seven (7 ) acres in area. Further, the site was described as being 2 . 1 acres with 5 acres being available for future development. This is blatant deception. It is intended to create the impression that 2 . 1 acres are vacant and that 5 acres are available for future development. It makes what is actually the proposed expansion of an already overdeveloped property appear negligible in what was made to appear as a vacant 7 acre property. 3) There is no doubt that the westerly portion of the property , housing the motel and other commercial uses , had to be included for the property to comprise 7 acres. Further, the original site plan , on which you and other town agencies acted, clearly identified the motel site , by Section , Block and Lot , as part of the 7 acre site. 4 ) The currently planned parking parcel on the northerly side of Rte. 25 was not part of the original 7 acres , nor is it part of the 4 . 98 acres now claimed to constitute the entire property. Revised Site Area 1 ) Applicant now claims "Total Site Area" to be 4 .98 acres. This does not conform to the area cited on the Environmental Asseesment provided to the various agencies involved , nor does it include the subsequent addition of the northerly parking lot . ( 3) Abb 2 ) The motivation of the applicant in changing the site plan is clear. It undoubtedly from my informing the ZBA that the 7 acre site was already overdeveloped . It is currently the site of two marina operations , a motel , a restaurant and two or more commercial uses. As a consequence, the property is already overdeveloped. By Town Code , the motel requires a site of 3 full acres , and marina, restaurant and commercial uses each require 80 , 000 SF. Thus, by Code requirements , the present improvements , alone , would require a minimum of 12 full acres . The project can be described concisely as attempting to cram ten pounds of sugar into a five pound bag. Even at present , the property is nonconforming in various respects and constitutes an overimprovement . The expansion project , would create additional nonconformity , an obvious violation of the Code. The proposed new building, exclusive of other proposed structures , and based on coverage alone , would require a site of approximately 2 acres. By Code requirements , would require approximately 12 acres. Since the total property is only 7 acres , there is a deficiciency in site area of some 5 acres. The additional site required would 71% more than the property available. 3 ) By arbitrarily reducing the site area to 4 . 98 acres , approximately 2 acres is severed and designated as the site of the motel and other commercial uses . By Code , approximately 8. 5 full acres would be required to accommodate the improvements now sited on the severed 2 acre parcel . 4 ) The 30 ,000 SF, on the northerly side of Rte. 25 , which is the intended site for additional parking, is not part of the the reduced area of 4 .98 acres cited on the revised site plan. 5) In a belated attempt to sever the motel site from the 7 acre total area reported on the Environmental Assessment , the appliant now advances a claim of seperate ownership . Militating against such a claim are the following : a) Both so called seperate parcels are owned in an interrelated pattern of family ownership. The nature of the combined ownership is , at least , "beneficial" . b) Both parcels are operated conjunctively and are advertised as so being. c ) The docking facilities at the motel site re operated conjunctively with those of the larger marina. (4 ) d) A survey prepared by Roderick Van Tuyl , P. C. for Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc. , revised to April 4 , 1989 , has the legend "Map of Property Surveyed for Port of Egypt Enterprises , Inc. " This survey includes the motel property and is the evident basis for the 7 acre total property area reported in the Environmental Assessment. A copy of this survey is in the Board's files . e) Sheds are built across the arbitrarily claimed property line; confirming a unity in use . f) The motel and the major existing marina building are seperated only by a side yard totaling only 15 ft. +/-. The minimum side yard for each parcel in an MII district is 25 ft. Separration of these two parcels leaves a side yard for each of only 7 1/2 ft. It would effectively preclude emergency access to either building. A basic question, and one yet to be answered, is what influenced , and what standard of planning permitted the erection of a potentially hazardous boat storage building within 15 ft. of a motel and , further, permitted such an outrageous concentration of uses. Parking Requirements and Boat Count Parking Parking requirements and boat count are indisputably linked in the Town Code. 1 ) The Town Code unequivacably requires one parking space of 350 SF for each boat accommodated at a marina. 2) If, as I have been informed , the Planning Board has arbitrarily permitted the applicant to base his planning on 1/4 parking space per racked boat , the Board has acted in clear defiance of the Town Code. 3 ) Sec. 100-254 B (4) of the Code states : "The Planning Board may vary or waive parking requirements provided that such change will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety or general welfare and will have the effect of nullif in the intent and provisions of the Zoning Code. " emphasis supplied 4) The Code is explicit in its provisions for parking requirements. ( 5) 0416* As to the intent of the Code, the Planning Board is well aware that the Town Board has resoled the question of intent by refusing to adopt Councilman Penny' s abortive attempt to amend the Town Code by reducing the parking requirements for marinas. The Town Board evidently saw through this ploy which would have permitted thousands of additional boats in Southold' s waters . 5) The Town Board recognized that the parking regulation in the Town Code represents its sole method of control over the number of boats to be launched by marinas into town waters . It is not within the purview of the Planning Board to unilaterally add untold numbers of boats in town waters; even with considerations of public health, safety and welfare aside. Boat Count 1 ) The applicant has cynically omitted a boat count from his latest version of a site plan. By so doing, he has attempted to subvert the proper application of the Code. 2) It can be deduced from the applicant' s version of parking requirements that there are at , at present , 202 boats on the property. 3) There is a severe discrepancy between the number of boats claimed to be on the premises by the applicant and the count reported by other sources . In both the North Fork Boat Guide and the Suffolk Times Business Review, in advertisements approved by the applicant, it is stated that there are 150 boats in the water. This contrasts with the 122 boats cited on the site plan. 4 ) From the site plan it can be deduced that the applicant claims that there are presently 80 boats in rack storage . In the referenced North Fork Boat Guide, the figure is 130. Further, the survey conducted by the NFEC provides a count of 165 boats in rack storage. 5) A site plan cannot be considered , much less approved, unless there is an accurate and impartial count of boats presently accommodated and those for which future storage may be planned. Implicit in Code requirements is a limitation on the number of boats and continued enforcement of this limitation. The deficiency in parking spaces for even the present level of marina operations can be graphically illustrated as follows : ( 6) Analysis of Parking Requirements for Existing Marina Operation Applicant Code Requirement In water slips 122 spaces 150 spaces Rack storage 20 165 Marina employees 24 24 Totals 166 339 Deficiency in spaces for current operation 173 spaces Deficiency in parking area for present use 60,550 SF ( 173 spaces @ 350 SF ea. ) ( 1 . 39 Ac. ) 1 ) Applicant provides only 109 marina parking spaces on the 4 . 98 acres claimed to be the site area. This would result in an actual deficiency of 230 spaces for the current operation. In terms of area this would constitute 80 ,500 SF or 1 .85 Ac. 2) Parking area on the northerly side of Rte. 25 was not included in the Environmental Assessment nor is it part of the 4. 98 Ac. now claimed to constitute the site. 3) Even were the northerly parcel included it would provide, at best , 66 parking spaces. (See seperate analysis ) 4) No consideration could have been given to the Board, in issuing its Negative Declaration, to the environmental and health, safety and welfare effects of the proposed northerly parking lot . %) It is obvious that the current deficiency in parking area could only be corrected by using the area now proposed for marina expansion. Nonconformity The above analsis demonstrates that the subject property is even at present. The property is also nonconforming with resect to setbacks, coverage etc. , as will bedemonstrated by further analysisThe degree of nonconformity would only be increased by the proposed expansion. The proposed expansion violates the provisions of Article XXIV of the Town Code cited below: ( 7) Sec. 100-240 Purpose. "The purpose of this Article is to reduce or minimize impacts of uses which do not conform to the use or bulk requirements set forth in this chapter, all uses and buildings that become nonconforming by reason of any subsequent amendment to to this chapter and all buildings containing nonconforming uses . " Sec. 100-242 Nonconforming buildings with conforming uses. A. "Nothing in this Article shall br deemed to prevent the remodeling, reconstruction or enlargement of a nonconforming building containing a conforming use , provided that such action does not create any new nonconformance or increase the degree of nonformance with regard to the regulations pertaining to such buildings. There can be no question that the proposed project is in in direct conflict with both the purpose and intent of the Town Code. Restaurant Property 1 ) Property is not in single and seperate ownership. 2) Town Code requires 80 ,000 SF of plot area for restaurants in MII districts. 3) Land area is available to comply with this requirement. 4 ) Area arbitrarily apportioned by applicant as being under lease has no bearing on Code requirements. Area under lease totals only 10 ,032 +/- SF. 5) Required parking lot area , alone , is 15 ,050 SF, or 50% more than leased area. 6 ) Propose parking area is partially outside leased area. 7) Building has insufficient setback from State ROW. 8) Retaining wall is outside leased area and encroaches on State ROW. 9) Property does not conform to landscaping requirements. (8) Analysis of Existing Plot Coverage on Revised 4 . 98 Ac. Total area 216 ,058 SF Less Code requirement for restaurant 80 ,000 Net area for marina operations 136 , 058 )present and proposed) ( 3 . 12 Ac . ) Maximum permitted coverage @ 30% 40 ,817 SF (building and structures) Existing marina structures Main Building 29,260 SF Office and shop 3 ,078 Shed 1 ,852 Wash platform (Sec. 100-13) 6 , 910 Total existing buildings and structures 41 , 100 SF Existing coverage as % of permitted coverage 101 % Plot requirement for existing structures 133,000 5F ( 3. 15 Ac. ) Note : It is clear from this analysis , based on building coverage alone , that the prepresent cooverage exceeds that permitted on the 3. 12 Ac. available for marina use. The proposed new structues would require an additional 2. 23 Ac. of net site area,or 171% of the area available. (continued) ( 9) Analysis of Proposed Plot coverage on Revised 4 . 98 Ac . Total area for marina operations 13�30�q SAF. ) Maximum permitted covarage @ 30% 40 ,817 SF Existing buildings and structures 41 , 100 SF Propposed buildings and structures 29 , 175 Total existing and proposed buildings and structures 70 ,275 SF Proposed coverage as % of permitted coverage 172% Plot requirement for existing and proposed improvements 234 ,250 SF (5 . 38 Ac . ) Note : The proposed plan would , based on coverage alone, require 5 . 38 Ac.or 2.26 Ac. more than is available for marina use. Site Requirements for Existing marina per Code Total area for marina operations 136,058 SF Code requirements: Landscaping @ 20% 27 ,210 SF Existing structures 41 , 100 Parking 118 ,650 186 ,960 Total area required for existing marina 186 ,960 Available areaAa X958 Deficiency in site area for existing marina 50 , 902 SF ( 1 . 17 Ac. ) ( 10) Site Requirements for Proposed Plan per Code Total area for marina operations 136 ,058 SF Code requirements : Landscaping @ 20% 27 ,210 SF Existing structures 41 , 100 Proposed structures 29 , 175 Existing parking 118 ,650 _ Proposed parking 53 ,200+� Total area required for proposed plan 269 , 335+/- Available area 136 ,058 Deficiency in site area for proposed plan 133,277 SF ( 3.06 Ac . ) Note : The 30 ,00 SF area of the proposed northerly parking lot was not included in the Environmental Assessment nor in the 4.98 Ac. area now claimed to be the total site . Even were it included , the effect on the site deficiency would be negligible , demonstrable as follows: Total area required for proposed plan 269 , 335 SF Available area ( including northery lot ) 166, 058 Deficiency in site area for proposed plan 103 , 277 SF (2 . 37 Ac. ) (continued) ( 11 ) Analysis of Proposed Parking on NIS Rte. 25 Dimensions : 300ft. x 100ft. Total area : 30,000 SF Proposed parking 110 spaces Maximum yield @ 100% coverage 86 Deficiency in spaces @ 100% coverage 14 spaces Maximum Parking per Code Total area 30 , 000 SF Less perimeter parking 6 , 340 23,660 Interior landscaping @ 10 SF per space Maximum capacity (23 , 660 Sf / 360 SF per space) 66 spaces Proposed spaces 110 Maximum spaces per Code 66 Deficiency in spaces 44 spaces Proposed spaces as % of permitted spaces 167% Deficiency in area for proposed 110 spaces : 30 ,000 SF x 167% 50 , 100 SF Available area 30 ,000 Deficiency in area 20 , 100 SF (0. 46 Ac . ) Note : Aside from the highway conditions previously recited , plan shows 5 parallel driveways , 38 ft. apart entering Rte. 25 . There is no provision for landscaping, including trees , no provision for lighting and no specifications for surfacing and drainage . ( 12) Proposed Building Height 1 ) The proposed plan represents a cynical attempt to exploit the already ridiculous provisions of the Town Code. 2 ) The code provides for a maximum height of 35 ft. , measured as the average height from ridge to eave for gable roofs and to the highest point of flat and mansard roofs. 30 If anyone had given this any thought it would have been obvious that by this standard it would be possible to build an "A" frame structure 70 ft . high , or a functional commercial/industrial structure 60 ft . in height . 4) Architects I have consulted state, by architectual formulae , this is a flat roofed structure. At the very least it is a mansard roof . In either case , height is measured to the 45 ft . ridge . 5) As proof of this , if anyone had bothered to calculate it, 92% of the floor area of the proposed building is 40 ft . or more in height. 6) The storage capacity of this type of building is flexible. While the stated capacity is 152 boats , the proposed structure could easily accommodate in excess of 200 boats. Landscaping Requirements 1 ) Code call for 20% landscaping in MII districts . 2) On a 7 Ac , parcel , 1 . 4 Ac . of landscaping is required. 3) Lanscaping on the site plan does not meet Code requirements. 4) Sec. 100-210 provides for landscaping "along major trffic corridors. " Sec. 100-212B provides for front yard landscaping 15 ft. in depth. Sec , 100 214 A&B regulates landscaping for parking areas. There is additional provision for landscaping 5 ft. in depth in front of buildings . 5 ) Applicant has based his revised planning opn a single 4 . 98 Ac. site. Therefore, landscaping requirements obtain over entire area. (continued) ( 13 ) Drainage Requirements 1 ) Applicant ' s site plan treats entire 4 .98 Ac, area as a single parcel. 2) Applicant must provide a drainage plan which provides for "zero runoff" on entire property. 2) Applicant ties the entire property together by calculating both present and future impervious areas as follows : Present impervious areas 249620 SF (Buildings and pavement) Future impervious areas 27 , 125 Total impervious areas 51 , 745 SF fib) This is a gross miscalculation, demonstrable as follows : Present impervious areas Main building 29 ,260 SF Office and shop 3 ,078 Shed 1 , 852 Wash platform 6 ,910 Future impervious areas Proposed building 25 , 375 Wash platform 3 , 800 Pavement ? Total impervious area 70 , 275+ SF Note : Itis impossible to deduce from the site plan the amount of impervious pavement existing or to be added . Conclusions 1 ) It is my opinion tht this plan represents a calculated and cynical attempt to circumvent Code regulations in almost every respect. 2 ) That this project has reached the stage of site plan approval not ons review procedures , but also on the competence and motivation of the Boards involved. 3) For the Planning Board to have issued a Negative Declaration for this project is a travesty of the SEQRA process. ( 14) � V � ', su6G'� /?K PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. P)6 Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 February 15 , 1991 Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Southold , New York Dear Bob : Enclosed , as per meeting , is a Preliminary Draft Layout of a sixty ( 60 ) vwhicle parking lot . Please review and provide your comments . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC. Q... Merlon E . Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E. President Enclosures : 2 Copies of Site Plan Revision Date 02/ 14/91 cc : Mr . William Lieblein w/Attachment Mr . Victor Lessard w/Attachment MEW/iw FEB 2 1 199 Y,U Gb�yr u n • pd �v WVIKINA F . M. Flynn A P. O. Box 144 Southold, N . Y. 11971 e S February 12, 1991 Commissioner Franklin E. White { Department of Transportation , State of New York -� State Office Buildinq Campus Y 1220 Washington Avenue ' Albany, N.Y. 12232 Dear Commissioner White : It is my understanding that the 'Town of Southold has sought your department's assistance in eliminating a purportedly {„F dangerous condition which exists on State Route 25, to the east of the highway overpass across the LIRR ROW at Ashamomuck. �& Itis noteworthy that the town has not called your attention ' . . to what, in my opinion, is a far more dangerous condition existing along the highway in the Budd ' s Pond area, to the west of the overpass. I have taken the unusual action of writing to you directly since I am of the opinion that an unhealthy, synergistic •m ' relationship exists among certain property owners, town < : officials , applicant ' s "consultants” and the staff of your local yy,, office. I hardly expect you to intervene personally, but I 1's believe this situation should be reviewed by an impartial professional on your staff. The Town of Southold, by deliberate action, has strip zoned both sides of an approximately one-half mile stretch of Rte. t 25 for marina use. At this location Rte. 25 is an uncontrolled, v: curving, two land, increasingly heavily traveled, high speed, i main east-west traffic artery for the town . There are no curbs and curb cuts , sidewalks , delineated pedestrian crossways , etc. >4= . As the result of this outrageously poor, and highly questionable planning, and lack of foresight, noncontiguous , nonwaterfront parcels on the northerly side of the highway are used conjunctively f with those on the south side for combined marina operations. The result is that the marina operators have effectively incor- porated a State highway into their marina operations . ; ;• Consideration of the public ' s safety and welfare has been ignored. Boats are transported back and forth across the highwayy:... by travelift and forklift . Heavy equipment and materials are also transported across the road. All with impunity. 'aw 41 h i • cz, A Signs are in the State ROW, a building encroaches thereon as do boats in storage. A presently planned expansion project provides for an additional 150 plus boats in a marina on the south side to be served by 110 parking places on a separate parcel on the north side of the highway. The planned storage building places the potential fire and explosion hazard of these stored boats in direct proximity of a State highway . This sets the precedent for the proliferation of such combined uses . At least one person has been killed crossing the highway in this vicinity and, unf.ortunateiy, particularly in the summer season, the death of pedestrians crossing this highway is not an uncommon affair. Years ago, when I was a consultant to your department, I was j: the recipient of case studies wherein the State planned underpasses under highways to facilitate the safe passage of farm equipment from one field to another. Here a more egregiously dangerous situation is approved by the town and, apparently, ignored by the State . b With respect to my comment about synergistic relationships, I call your attention to an FIS prepared for Young' s Marina iy located off a 16 ft. ROW at a point 1750+ ft. southerly of z the ROW' s intersection with the southerly side of Rte. 25. The point of intersection is approximately 150 ft, westerly of an upward change of grade leading to the previously described highway overpass . This portion of the highway is also curving, uncontrolled, is two lanes in width and is subject to the same heavy, high speed traffic previously mentioned. x The traffic count for Rte . 25 , submitted as part of the survey in the EIS is outdated. The proposed daily trips, intersecting with Rte. 25 , was 2204 . Peak traffic was projected at 183 trips per hour. Basic arithmetic indicates an average of 92 trips, or one every 39 seconds . At the peak hour , the projection was 133 trips, or one every 19 seconds . These trips to intersect with Rte. 25 under the conditions described! t ; The projected traffic would be a mix of passenger and commercial vehicles including large trailers transporting heavy boats . I submit that it would be impossible for much of the traffic to pass on the ROW. The probable effect on emergency vehicles is obvious . i While I understand that your department does not concern itself with traffic on private ROWS , when this project comes up again i4! �1 ( 3) for approval , the problem will be exacerbated by the recent increases in the truck and load widths permitted on State highways . These larger vehicles could not possibly pass on a 16 ft. ROW and would compound the problem at the highway intersection. Your local office approved the traffic study in the EIS. Could this decision possibly have been influenced by the fact that the engineer submitting the traffic study had previously served your department as the superior of the ?. engineer who approved it on behalf of the department? l I assure you that toners, as well as myself, consider the a' existing situation a threat to oublic safety and welfare. 'v I trust your department will submit this entire matter to further study. t� Very truly yours , ' F . M. Flynn cc: Southold Town Board r Southold Town Attorney Southold Town Planning Board rt: Dr. Lee Koppelman Suffolk County Planning Department North Fork Environmental Council Southold 2000 The League of Women Voters i yY. tiY qy f Yj(A INSPECTORS ��$UFFO � • VICTOR LESSARD, Principal Gyp SCOTT L.HARRIS,Supervisor CURTIS HORTON, Senior y at Southold Town Hall VINCENT R.WIECZOREK, Ordinance P.O.Box 1179,53095 Main Road ROBERT FISHER, Assistant Fire y �!� Southold, New York 11971 Building Inspectors #t Fax(516) 765-1823 Telephone(516) 765-1800 THOMAS FISHER GARY FISH OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: BENNETT ORLOWSKI - PLANNING BOARD FROM: VICTOR LESSARD - PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR K� SUBJECT: PORT OF EGYPT EXPANSION DATE: JANUARY 30, 1991 Before I would be able to certify the proposed Port of Egypt site plan, I would need to have answers to the following: 1. I see no written approval for access to State Highway from Proposed Parking Lot. 2 . Parking lot shows no drainage; no screening toward residential district; and street parking to edge of State Road; (traffic safety) utility pole in middle of exit area. No protection of contaminates to wetland area; and no lights indicated on same parking lot. If these conditions are to be waived, please indicate, to me, in writing so I may continue the certification after receiving State access approval. VL:gar .,0 S�FFOIK��Gy PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS i;a g SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman JO's ® �. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward L Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 TO: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: January 25, 1990 SUBJECT: Proposed site plan Port of Egypt SCTM# 1000-56-4-10.1, 11 & 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 . 2 , 3 . 3 , 4 & 6 .1 Attached for your certification are the maps for the proposed storage building for the Port of Egypt. ICK PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 January 11 , 1991 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM # 1000-4- 10 . 1 , 11 & 13. 2 SCTM # 1000-56-6-3 . 2 , 3 . 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr . Orlowski : Reference is made to your letter of December 19 , 1990 . Enclosed are six (6 ) copies of the Site Plan which have been revised showing the details of the sign and the utility poles . Also enclosed is three ( 3 ) copies of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services stamped and approved drainage plans , which are all of the copies available , which added to the one that you already have will make a total of four (4 ) . It is my understanding , in accordance with a recent telephone conversation , that this number of copies will be acceptable . After review and approval , would you please return one copy for the Owners records . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E . Wiggi , Ph . D. ,M. . President JAN, � 1991 Enclosures Per Text cc : Mr. William Lieblein �v9�k��G PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ® '`• SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Y✓ "�"� $ Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 19, 1990, 1990 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM# 1000-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 . 2,3 .3 , 4 & 6 .1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has received your transmittal letter of December 17, 1990, containing six (6) copies of the site plan, with a revision date of December 14, 1990 . This submission is not complete. The Board refers you to its letter of December 4, 1990, (copy enclosed) in which it also requested six ( 6) copies of the Storm Drainage Plan showing the Health Department' s approval stamp, and the notation, "no water or sanitary facilities" , in the proposed storage building, as requested by the Department of Health. In addition to the above, the Board in its letter of December 4, 1990, had requested a detailed sketch of the 4' by 8 ' sign and requested that the site plan show the location of any utility poles. Upon receipt of the additional and revised maps showing the requested changes, the Planning Board will be able to proceed. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: William Lieblien 4i, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 11 y t rn SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. 1,fx �- Richard G. Ward - ' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 4, 1990 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM# 1000-56-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56--6-3.2, 3 . 3 , 4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has received your revised maps dated April 11, 1990 and September 13 , 1990, delivered to the Board by Mr. Lieblein on November 20, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. The storm drainage plan must show the boat wash down pad catch basin, and the notation, " no water or sanitary facilities" in the proposed storage building as requested by the Department of Health. 2. The property plan must show the entire property both north and south of Route 25, including the parking spaces north of Route 25 , preferably on the same map, although two maps may be used with a matching line if necessary. The map must indicate the curb line, curb cuts and the location of utility poles. Landscaping at the south west corner of the existing office and shop must be shown together with the type of shrubs to be planted. 3 . A detailed sketch of the 4 ' by 8 ' sign must be provided. Five sets of the two maps; the drainage plan with its existing Health Department stamp, and the property plan, remamed the site plan, both corrected as above are required before the Board can proceed. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, �y Bennett Orlowski, Jr. chairman cc: William Lieblien PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootleg Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 December 17 , 1990 Mr . Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Southold , New York 5`C Dear Bob : Enclosed are the latest revisions to the Site Plan for the above referenced project as requested . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . Merlon E . Wiggin , . E . President Enclosures : 6 Copies of Site Plan Revision Date 12/ 14/90 cc : Mr. William Lieblein MEW/ iw DEC 7 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Very�"`?4 O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward is Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 December 4, 1990 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM# 1000-56-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 . 2 SCTM# 1000-56--6-3. 2, 3 . 3 , 4 & 6 .1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has received your revised maps dated April 11, 1990 and September 13 , 1990, delivered to the Board by Mr. Lieblein on November 20, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1 . The storm drainage plan must show the boat wash down pad catch basin, and the notation, " no water or sanitary facilities" in the proposed storage building as requested by the Department of Health. 2. The property plan must show the entire property both north and south of Route 25, including the parking spaces north of Route 25, preferably on the same map, although two maps may be used with a matching line if necessary. The map must indicate the curb line, curb cuts and the location of utility poles. Landscaping at the south west corner of the existing office and shop must be shown together with the type of shrubs to be planted. 3 . A detailed sketch of the 4 ' by S ' sign must be provided. Five sets of the two maps; the drainage plan with its existing Health Department stamp, and the property plan, remamed the site plan, both corrected as above are required before the Board can proceed. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: William Lieblien Fa J fIM M Z PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ^ SCOTT L.,HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman VJ� ^!►f " Y�. �C Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. t� Richard G. Ward ',; Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 October 15, 1990 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM# 1000-4-10. 1, 11 & 13.2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3 .2,3 .3, 4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: This letter will confirm telephone conversations that Bob Kassner has had with you and Mr. Lieblein concerning the maps received by the Planning Board on October 3, 1990. The following changes must be made before the Board can proceed with their review: 1. The size of the building on the project site plan is incorrect. The correct size as granted in the variance by the Board of Appeals on January 7, 1990 is 203 ' by 125 ' or 25,375 square feet. 2. The French Drain must include the installation of ADS slotted drainage pipe connected to the leaching pools. 3 . Parking requirements must be recalculated on the site plan using one (1) space for wet storage and one quarter space (1/4) for dry storage. PLANNING BOAR • 18 OCTOiF 2, 1990 Mr. Orlowski: Opposed? So ordered. Mr. Orlowski: Moving on to Other - Do we have any other? Mr. Bill Leiblein - Port of Egypt - The reason for coming tonight is because I didn' t get a chance to come to your last work session and what I was hoping to do tonight was make a list of the things that I still need to do or have done before you can say we've had site plan approval and can go to the Building Department and start working again on getting a building permit. Since my last conversation with you Benny and with Bob Kassner, Merle Wiggins has been talking with the folks from the Board of Health in Riverhead and I believe he is preparing a set of plans to take up to them to get stamped and I understand that they don' t have any questions. I have been in communication with Jim Lentini with the New York State Department of Transportation and Traffic Division with regard to the curbing and curb cuts and shoulder work and I saw him on the week-end and he said to call him today which I did and he was going to get back to me and try to get together with me this week or early next week and I have also contacted one of the curbing contractors that did the work for Mr. Mandel, I believe it was Wayside. I have gotten some rough ideas of the cost and it is expensive but it is not out of line. One of the C questions in my mind is I don' t know how long it takes to get the permit from the New York State Department of Transportation but I sent you a letter in which I said I am on record as saying whatever they want me to do, I ' ll do it. One of the questions is that I said in my mind is I said, what else do I have to do with regard to curbing to keep the Planning Board happy. If I say, I will do whatever they say, are you prepared to then say, subject to you putting in curbing as required by the state, you have site plan approval with that particular area, otherwise I see another year going by possibly. I don' t know I 'm sure it doesn't take that long but I would like to be able to proceed. I don't know whether I 'm going to be able to go fast enough to get anything done this winter so I can use the building this winter. It is getting so short now that it might not work but I 've still got it in the back of my mind. Mr. Orlowski: I don' t see a problem if we get the correspondence from the Department of Transportation and what they are going to ask for. Does this board have any problem with this? Mr. Ward: I really don' t have any problem with subject to. Mr. Leiblein: One of the things is that until I talk to them as to what they want I can' t put it on the final plans and you have asked for a final plan with the building size, the changes that were made as a result of the Zoning Board of Appeals. We 're deleting where the Gift Shop was and we' re making the PLANNING BOARD • 19 OCTOO 2, 1990 building a little bit smaller, so all that there was one plan dropped off just to be used at a work session but Merle said if I go through and make all these changes and then I have to make another set and put the curbing in and make another set, we're trying to get it down and make one more set and get as many things on it as you want. Mr. Orlowski: The set that was dropped off today, that' s not the final set then. Mr. Leiblein: I don' t know what Merle dropped off today, he said about two weeks ago he dropped off one set of plans, six or eight copies or whatever is normally required. Ms. Scopaz: He dropped off another set this afternoon and they have already been reviewed and there was some discrepancies but Bob is going to call you tomorrow and go over the listing. I just want to add one thing if I am reading you correctly, if you are willing to consider his proposal about the subject to that perhaps you could ask Mr. Lentini to simply submit the proposal to you before he finalizes it so you at least know what the state is considering. Mr. Leiblein: Basically, what they said to me last year and I will reconfirm now. Mr. Lentini said you have got two curb cuts here, one where people turn in right along side your C building and drive down past the boats that are on display and another area where they kind of drive in and go to Amando' s. Then you have where the Old Main Road comes onto the highway so you get three entrances to the highway in 200 feet and we don' t like that. I said that is not a problem so I put those two columns out there and it is pretty hard to drive through those and everyone comes in the entrance in front of Amando' s. My plan is to have a large enough curb cut so that as you are leaving there can be one lane for right hand turns and one lane for left hand turns and one fairly wide lane coming in and I haven't talked to Mr. Lentini but as I approach my place from the West, if the shoulder is improved enough, you can have a solid line that curves over to the right so that people that are coming up and slowing down can get off the main right-of-way so cars can go by without swerving into the other lane. I think that is going to make it much safer. If I am going to spend all this money on this project, I want to make it just as nice and I possibly can so that people. will want to come to my place of business. I mean this is suppose to be a win, win, situation because the Town is going to get more taxes and I 'm going to get more business and it is going to be safer. That is what we are shooting for and that is the purpose of us being before this Planning Board I assume. Those are the things I have in mind and on the other side I assume the curbing would run around that little area that is sort of landscaped in front of Amando' s and then just fade away as it goes down onto Old Main Road. Mr. Lentini said that he didn' t think that they were going to require me to do curbing on the section across to where we plan PLANNING BOAPO • 20 OCTOJ& 2, 1990 to do the parking but they want me to do something to improve Cthe drainage and I still don' t have a problem with that. We ' re kind of working on it, I put a much larger drain in last year and for the most part it works and hopefully he will have the person that is in charge of this area there to meet with me and whatever I do there it' s going to make everything nicer so I don't have a problem with any of it but generally that is what we are looking at doing. Having one curb cut where all the cars come in and out now. I 'm sure all of you drive by and know that there is just the one entrance way now so we will formalize that with real curbing. That is what I plan to do there and if you say O.K. , you have site plan approval subject to getting or putting in whatever curbing the State requires and meeting their requirements and you can' t have a C.O. until you do that or however you want to word it. I can have Merle put on a plan what I think I am going to do, I don' t know what you want. . I would like to get a set of plans and say, here they are. Mr. Orlowski: Are you going to meet with Mr. Lentini? Mr. Leiblein: Hopefully I will meet with him this week or early next week. Mr. Orlowski: We will be back here October 22, 1990. Mr. Leiblein: Are you having a work session in the meantime? Mr. Orlowski: Yes, we' ll be having work sessions all the time. There seems to be a discrepancy because there are three plans on three different building sites. There are all kind of things floating around and we want to see it all together. Mr. Leiblein: Between now and the 22nd I ' ll try to get correspondence from the State and work with Bob and Valerie as far as here are six plans, throw everything else away, this is it O.K. ? Mr. Orlowski: Great. Mr. Leiblein: If I can get curbing on there, he 's agreed to it otherwise it will be curbing to be as State requires. Mr. Ward: Do what you think is best, if you can' t show it do what you think is best. Put a note on it subject to approval of DOT. Mr. Leiblein: One of the things that you asked is that on the plot plan that the area across the street where we're going to have parking be shown instead of the area being shown off to the left where we had it on the plan we showed in actual reference to the parcel on the south side. We 've got all kinds of things drawn up like that on the twenty to one scale and I would request that you allow us to submit for the purpose of showing the relationship of the north property to the south side PLANNING BOAR* • 21 OCTOO 2, 1990 C property and that we use the twenty to one but as far as the size we be allowed to leave it on the left rather than redrawing the whole thing fifty to one. Is that acceptable? Up until we started this project, all of our scales were fifty feet to the inch so we have numerous plot plans that VanTuyl drew up for us where it shows the north and south side on fifty to one. When we started this project and you said we needed twenty feet to the inch we only did the south side initially and then we put the other on the left side since that is where the C and L property was that was shown at one time. Is that acceptable? Mr. McDonald: You showed us one map where they were both shown together at one fifty and each of the separates at one twenty. Mr. Leiblein: If you draw the whole thing up one then you I guess you just turn the machine on more. I 'm trying to save the expense of having him draw. Mr. McDonald: Maybe I misunderstood you but I gat the impression that both of them already exist at one point but they're not together. Mr. Leiblein: No, I have a one to twenty which shows the north side and the south side in relationship to one another. In true with the highway but I have one on a one to fifty. I don' thave it twenty to one and what I would like to do is keep C submitting what I 've been submitting as far as the twenty to one. The large one is the one that shows you where the parking space is laid out and give you five copies of whatever the requirement is in the fifty to one with the north side and south side on either side of the road. Mr. McDonald: Do we have a one to fifty right now? Mr. Leiblein: You've probably got one in the file somewhere. Mr. Orlowski: The file is very thick. Mr. McDonald: Would it be alright if we took a look at it . Mr. Leiblein: O.K. , then either Merle or I will be in contact with Bob or Valerie. You just want to see where is this thing in relation to, I mean everybody knows but where does it start and where does it stop. One other clarification, when I spoke to you or it may have been Bob, with regard to the parking, we have right now I think we have one space for every boat. Did you tell me on the phone that you want one space for every boat in the water and four spaces for every boat on high and dry? Did you change that? Mr. Orlowski: No. Mr. Leiblein: No, O.K. . PLANNING BOAR* • 22 OCTO* 2, 1990 Mr. Orlowski: Right, now we have to go with one to one. We've been working on the other but it is still up in the air and probably we don' t know how long it will be. That is why we weren' t looking at the project in total before and that is what now we are asking from everybody because we are going to need that to get enough parking going by the one to one. Mr. Leiblein: I don't know if I submitted this recently but in several of the marine magazines now they are showing these car pallets which the person drives his car onto a pallet, you pick the car up and put it into the rack and when you are done, the guy comes in and you take it out. You're up there laughing and smiling but, a typical car runs anywhere' s from ten to if it's a mercedes to maybe sixty or seventy thousand dollars and the boat' s that we are handling typically run twenty to fifty thousand dollars and the boats range in size up to a twenty eight footer which weighs seven or eight thousand pounds compared to a car which is much shorter so picking up a car is like next to nothing. Mr. McDonald: The reason I was laughing was because I would be afraid that someone would come forward and state in the code that this space would have to have more parking spaces. Mr. Leiblein: Well, my thought was that if the code isn' t changed at some time to reduce the requirement for parking, based on the study that was done I think it was last summer. I think it was up to you guys wasn' t it? Mr. Orlowski: No, we were in favor of it and we did a lot of work to approve it but it didn't work. Mr. Leiblein: At this point, I 'm not going to run out and buy a bunch of car pallets because I know I don't really need them and the other part is the car pallet is $1500. 00 and when you do this project and divide the cost of the project by the number of slips it comes up to about $1500. 00 a slide so this doubles the cost of the project. If you don' t have the land then using the car pallets of course simplifies things. If at some point we say we need to do something across the street we might come to the board five years from now and say can we use car pallets and replace the parking across the street with car pallets in which case you don' t need any parking spaces because everytime the guy goes out you put the boat away. The car in the boat spot rather. Is there anything else that I haven' t asked about that you need besides the curbing and the Board of Health and the final set of plans. Mr. Orlowski: That is all we're waiting for. We' ll probably be in contact with Merle first thing tomorrow morning, we already reviewed them this afternoon. ' Mr. Leiblein: Thanks for your indulgence. PLANNING BOAPID • 23 OCTO& 2, 1990 C Mr. Latham: Did you say that you didn' t need any curbing along on the north side. Mr. Leiblein: I didn't say that yet, when I spoke to Mr. Lentini he said, I think we can be lenient in that area but the main thing we are looking for is to make sure the drainage is improved. Mr. McDonald: I would be looking for, if not curbing, something to restrict the flow of traffic out of that parking lot. I don' t know about curbing but something to show people (inaudible) . Mr. Leiblein: The logical place to have an entry to that parking lot is directly across the street from where we drive in now. When we go across the street with a fork lift to take a boat we go through there so my thought is if the Department of Transportation goes along with it to make a curb cut with some shouldering that goes twenty or thirty feet either way and the rest of the area with some of those concrete columns or some CCA pilings and we drive in and come in and set the boats down. As you may have noticed when we did have boats over there we turned them all around so the sterns were to the highway. Even that didn' t do any good we still had two engines stolen on the main highway after stealing one on the south side of the highway so that' s $25,000 worth of engines down the drain. I C put an alarm system in now and it is fine. It's coming this way. You could leave anything anywhere in the old days quote, unquote. Mr. Latham: That was my question. Mr. Leiblein: At some time I may come in and say, we're going to fence things in but I hate to do that. I feel like I 'm going into a prison. I don' t have anymore questions if you don't. Mr. Orlowski: We don' t. Mr. Leiblein: Thank you very much and have a nice evening. Mr. Orlowski: Any other questions or comments? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxx John Calibrese: I 'm a partner in the subdivision of Pugliese and Calibrese. I was wondering what the progress? Mr. Orlowski : Well, tonight we set a final hearing for the 22nd of October and we did a Negative Declaration. Mr. Calibrese: Excuse me what did you say? Mr. Orlowski: A final hearing was set for October 22nd and we gave it a Negative Declaration in regards to 5EQRA. P� Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. ' IL Sept . 25, 1990 Mr . James Lentini N. Y. S. Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N. Y. 11787 Dear Jim, The purpose of this letter is to give you a status report on Port of Egypt ' s new boat storage building. So far we have been granted the necessary variances needed from our ZBA, and the Town Trustees have given us their blessing. The Planning Board has reviewed our final site plan and they are satisfied with it . Since it now appears that the project can procede, one of the final steps is to come to an agreement with the State DOT regarding curbing, shoulders and curb ruts. Since our last letter to you on August 6, 1989, we have signed a lease with the State for the triangle of land between Armondo' s and the State Highway. (SI.--.etch enclosed) Also since our last meeting_ we have closed off the westerly access to our property as you suggested. There is now only one direct access to our property off State Route 25. If our project receives final approval , we are prepared to install curbing and restore the shoulder on the south side of the highway. After reviewing the cost of moving the access to the old main read, we have decided not to pursue that . Since cur construction will be on the south side of the highway, we request a waiver of the requirement to install curbing on the north side of Route 25. We would like to review drainage on the north side with you and your area representatives so that it meets your requirements. We lock forward to seeing YOU during the week of Oct . 1 , 1990 for an on site inspection. Sinncerel y, William H. Lieblein MAIN ROAD/ROUTE 25/SOUTHOLD, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11971/516 765 2445/FAX 516 765 2592 • RK iz=!oPort of Egypt Marine, Inc. Sept . 27, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, N. Y. 11971 Gentlemen, We are presently in communication with the N. Y. S.. D. O. T. regarding their requirements for curb cuts, curbing and shoulder repair . Mr . James Lentini and I are planning tr- do an on site inspection the week: of Oct . 1 , 1990. As the enclosed letter indicates, it is our intention to work: with the state and come to an agreement on what is the best way to meet their requirements. The purpose of this letter is to go on record with your board with our intention to comply with the State D. O. T. ' s request , should our site plan be approved and we do this project . Sincerely, William H. Lieblein b MAIN ROAD/ROUTE 25/SOUTHOLD, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11971/516 765 2445/FAX 516 765 2592 SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER t SENDER: G SUBJECT: SCTM# : COMMENTS: C�G� . . ` it 1' • 0 r -1 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ';^ SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman W� `-"f Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. y+� Richard G. Ward �� = t� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 September 18, 1990 Merlon E. Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. 1 Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, N.Y. 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM# 1000-4-10.1, 11 & 13 .2 SCTM# 1000-56-6-3. 2 ,3. 3 , 4&6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has received the Board of Appeals' variance decision rendered on May 1, 1990, and the permit issued to you by the Trustees at their meeting on August 23 , 1990. Please submit revised plans incorporating all conditions of the variance and permit. The Planning Board also requests the following changes: 1. Parking requirements must be calculated at one space for wet storage and one quarter space for dry storage. 2. The en,tize j?rgpetti. Atoxtle;.a d Sot`irp !�f Witte 25 mast be s Nl�M although ' , two � se wi` line, curb cute andtb*'43 M-, =.; %W411ty Vol" If the proposed storage building will be completed in stages, the new and proposed future buildings must be shown on the plan, as well as the parking requirements for both the new and proposed future building. The Board accepts the Department of Transportation Vf requirements as contained in their letter of June 29, 199fl: (Copy enclosed for your use. ) These requirements must be incorporated into the final site plan. Proof of review by the Health Department will also be required. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector ti 11rv�' 00aftmoon" moo Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Sept . 25, 1990 Mr . James Lentini N. Y. S. Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N. Y. 11787 Dear Jim, The purpose of this letter is to give you a status report on Fort of Egypt ' s new boat storage building. So far we have been granted the necessary variances needed from our ZBA, and the Town Trustees have given us their blessing. The Planning Board has reviewed our final site plan and they are satisfied with it . Since it now appears that the project can precede, one of the final steps is to come to an agreement with the State DOT regarding curbing, shoulders and curb cuts. Since our last letter to you on August 6, 1989, we have signed a lease with the State for the triangle of land between Armondo' s and the State Highway. (Sketch enclosed) Also since our last meeting_ we have closed off the westerly access to our property as you suggested. There is now only one direct access to our property off State Route 25. If our project receives final approval , we are prepared to install curbing and restore the shoulder on the south side of the highway. After reviewing the cost of moving the access to the old main road, we have decided not to pursue that . Since our construction will be on the south side of the highway, we request a waiver of the requirement to install curbing on the north side of Route 25. We would like to review drainage on the north side with you and your area representatives so that it meets your requirements. We look forward to seeing you during the week of Oct . 1 , 1990 for an on site inspection. ,S/innce�reel y, , William H. Lieblein MAIN ROAD/ROUTE 25/SOUTHOLD, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11971/516 765 2445/FAX 516 765 2592 j M Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Sept. :27, 1990 Southold Town Planning Heard Southold Town Hall Southold, N. Y. 11971 Gentlemen, We are presently in communication with the N. Y. S. D, O. T. regarding their requirements for curb cuts, curbing and shoulder repair . Mr . James Lentini. and .1 are planning to do an on site inspection the week: of Oct . 1 , 1990. As the enclosed letter indicates, it is our intention to work with the state and come to an agreement on what is the best way to meet their requirements. The purpose of this letter is to go on record with your board with our intention to _amply with the State D. O. T. ' s request , should our site plan be approved and we do this project . Sincerely, (W/" William H. Lieblein MAIN ROAD/ROUTE PS/SOUTHOLD, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11971/516 765 2445/FAX 516 765 2592 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788 JAMES A. KUZLOSKI ^- FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR fd E !1 1,18r� y COMMISSIONER �lI- - I .,� �f Bennett Orlowski Town of Southold Planning Board Town Hall tl 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Route 25, Southold Our review of the subject plans was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. The entire frontage of the site must be curbed, and the shoulder must be rehabilitated across the site's frontage. Three driveways would seem to be appropriate for this site, one being the existing intersection with Old Main Road which might be relocated to the east to better service the adjacent parcel. This would have to be approved by the Town of Southold. Nvnt At present, land on the sa side of Route 25 is being utilized for boat storage and other business. The shoulder and pavement in this area has been severely eroded. Curbing and shoulder re!3toration must also be provided for this area. The subject applicant is utilizing a portion of state property for his operation. A review of our records reveals that this property was never conveyed to another party and is presently not available for abandonment or sale. Therefore, the applicant must contact Mr. F. Persan of our Real Estate Group at the above address and request a Use and Occupancy Permit. The Town of Southold has required the applicant to provide drainage information. Drainage proposals must address both sides of Route 25 in this area. On the north side, a culvert presently drains from the state highway onto the adjacent railroad tracks. The existing drainage system in this area may require cleaning or restoration, since the developer filled the marsh area along state right-of-way. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACT/ON EMPLOYER c � Bennett Orlowski June 29, 1989 Page 2 Please send five copies of revised plans to our Regional Permit Engineer, Mr. Vito Lena, at the above address. If you have any questions, kindly contact Mr. Lentini at (516) 360-6020. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, T'� K(011 T. C. HOFFMAN Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopa2 TCH:JH:JS 0 40 P�Lt kK� ✓ican,2 t.Ess►a-� k4F= June 11, 1990 Mr. Chuck Hamilton Water Division D. E. C. Stony Brook, New York Re: Permit #10-88-1624 Expiration Date 12/31/92 Reference to Map Dated 11/14/88 Dear Mr. Hamilton, by DEC Approved by DEC on 11/22/88 The NFEC and LWV's court suit against the Southold Master Plan should null and void the recent decision by the Zoning Board of Appeals' decision on the Port of Egypt Project (see attached) until a decision is forthcoming from the courts. We urge the DEC to support our position and to take into consideration that the original application regarding this project was misleading. If you wish more information to substantiate this allegation, we will be happy to forward same to your office. Your attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated and we look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, Joanna Northam JN/atc cc: Robert Green, DEC Reg. Affairs Division Robert deLuca, S.C. Dept. of Health Southold Planning Board FSK Southold Zoning Board of Appeals �� � Southold Attorney - Harvey Arnoff MAL COU LL a non profit organization for the prcen ation of land, sea, air and - qualitr of life Route 25 at lwr Lane PO Buv-If" .11attina'k X4 Y I/'H 2 510 NQ nxxn Pb • • oS�FFoIK�Do • • s VICTOR LESSARD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR = Z P.O. Box 1 179 Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1802 FAX(5 16)765-1823 Q �- OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 5, 1990 TO: Chairman, Z.B.A. FROM: BUILDING INSPECTOR'S OFFICE SUBJECT: INTERPRETATION The Building Department has applications for Building Permits and requests for certifications of site plans all the time. Reading the Z.B.A. decision of Port of Egypt Enterprises Inc. #3770, we are now interpreting the following. As refer- enced, in the decision, under 7(E) the Zoning Board is saying that storage buildings, in the Marine II Districts will be con- sidered part of the principal use of that district, because of the allowable heights of 35' -0. This certainly will aid toward certifications as to front yard, backyard setbacks of site plans and building permits. Now that the precedent is set, it would be to everyones benefit to put such a definition into the code and also consider the same status for Marine I Zone. CC. Planning Board Town Board 6 ITT o . SUP�Frr� oS�EFOlKcO � F,� TRUSTEES SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President Albert J. Krupski, Jr. 1 r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner FROM: John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Board of Trustees RE: Pending Application of Port of Egypt SCTM #1000-56-4-10.1,11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3 .2,3 . 3 ,4 & 6.1 DATE: March 23 , 1990 Just a reminder, the applicant in the above referenced application will need a Town Trustee wetlands permit for those activities within 75' of any wetland. JMB: jmt ��,� ; MAR 26M SU 6p,L-E • i o��FFo�k�o � � PK TRUSTEES r=►+ SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President 'rl `��� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Trustees RE: Port of Egypt SCTM #1000-56-4-10. 1,11 & 13 .2 1000-56-6-3 . 2, 3 . 3, 4 & 6 . 1 DATE: February 28, 1990 In answer to your memo of January 30, 1990 on the above noted project, the Trustees state the following policy: The Trustees want wash-down facilities for boats to be fully self-contained, and they wish to have roof runoff contained up to 2" flow on site, for site plan approvals. ,' _` MAA - rqn F E E: _ 1 .- 9E+ THi_i • 0 0, t9 F'W PECONiC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners Sc Consultants One 1100dcyAlley P.O. Box 672 Grecnport,New York 11944 (516)477.0030 Fax(516)477.0198 January 22 , 1990 Soutnold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold. I,.. I . New York - 11971 Hee Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building sC'rM d 1000-56-4-10 . 1 . 11 7 13 . 1_ .1000-56-3 . 2 , . 3 . 4 & 6 . 1 Dear Planning Board Memberst As par your requests Maximum Number of Beats Washed Per Day - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 Gallons of Water per Wash - - - - - - - - 2 - 3 Gallons Gallons of Water per Day - - - - - - - - 240 Gallons Leaching Pool Capacity - - - - - - - - - Approximately 2 , 400 Gallons leach Total for 2 Pools - - - - - - - - - - 4 , 800 Gallons Respectfully submlted. PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC. Merlon E . Wiggin , .M. E . President MEW/ iw PEP-- 1 - 0 T HI-, 1 _ • � � 3 7 Z Ft 1_ Z t-4 'z; � P7 Flo1" E R PECONIC AsSoCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Boodey Alley P.O. Box 672 Groenuort,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)4770198 January 22 , 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold. l.. 1 . New York - 11971 Rae Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Huilding SCTM U 1000-56-4-10 . 1 , 11 7 13 .17_ !/ 1000-56-3 . 2 , . 3 . A & 6 . Dear Planning Board Members , As per your request , Maximum Numher of Boats Washed Per Day - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 Gallons of Water per Wash - - - - - - - - 7 - 3 Gallons Gallons of Water per Day - - - - - - - - 240 Gallons Leaching Pool (rapacity - - - - - - - - - Approximately 2 , 400 Gallons hath Total for 2 Poo1R - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 , 800 Gallons Respectfully Rubmlted. PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC. Merlon E . Wiggin . —M. P . President MEW/ iw �o��EFOLK�O 4, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., ChairmanJO� �O� Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. '�1 `� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward jot P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold, New Yorkk 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please fi d ( ) sur ysfor 7,� � ppe...S�-1•. 3•.Z�-Z1o��•� Please 1dify this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. ,jery trul your Bennett Orlowski, Jr. l Chairman enc. � 4 �T 77-fE JL�2 5� 1mB /�l %//�� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 3 SCOTT L. HARRIS Benne[[ Orlowski, Jr., Chairman -74 Bennett Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. ✓/f� , Richard G. Ward _ �"�'y� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road rarJ P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 19 ,96 Frederick R. Weber, Secretary Southold Fire District Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Weber: Enclosed please fid ( ) sure ys forr� � 000—S�-1 3•,Z��3o��.� Please fattfyl this office as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. ery truly ur (V/U/Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman .b� t�'3 �.0 Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. fj Richard G. Ward �! _ Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: John M. Bredemeyer III, President FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner DATE: August 30, 1990 RE: Port of Egypt Site Plan SCTM#1000-56-4-10. 1, 11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3 . 2, 3 .3 , 4 & 6.1 I have reviewed the wetland permit that was granted to the above referenced applicant. There are significant differences between the conditions of your permit and that of the Board of Appeals ' decision of May 1, 1990. First, the Board of Appeals limited the size of the proposed building to 203 ' x 125' . The Trustee permit is for a 212' x 120' building. The Board of Appeals decision required that all roof runoff be retained in leaching basins. The Trustee decision is less restrictive. It only requires that a majority of the roof runoff be contained on site. But, it lumps in roof runoff with parking runoff. Decisions of the Zoning Board of Appeals cannot be modified by another Board, although another Board can issue more restrictive conditions. For example, although your permit is for a 212' x 120' building. Mr. Lieblein can only put up a 203' x 125' building or smaller. Before I review this application with the Planning Board I 'd like to review this application with you. The Planning Board's next work session is September 5th. If you can spare 10 to 15 minutes between now and then to discuss this issue I'd appreciate it. i '6 i o��gUFFOil �-c0 TRUSTEES vii ! = SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, 111, President O '.' Supervisor Henry P. Smith, Vice President y��d 0� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski. Jr. John L. Bednoski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 August 27 , 1990 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. One Bootleg Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport, NY 11944 Re: Port of Egypt-Boat Storage Building, SCTM #1000-56-4-10.1,11 & 13. 2; 1000-56-6-3 . 2, 3 .3, 4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: A3 The following action was taken by t1 Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on August, 1990 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, MERLON WIGGIN IN BEHALF OF PORT OF EGYPT applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated May 10, 1988 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and have approved this project, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 23, 1990 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT MERLON WIGGIN IN BEHALF OF PORT OF EGYPT BE AND IS GRANTED PERMISS E. ,. ORDINANCE TO: 25,440 Ft 351 in height - ridge, 45' ; in width SUBJECT to revised plans taking out the over ow pipe. Reasons supporting this decision: 1 . There will be no discharge to surface water from wash down activities. 2• 3 . An operating marina pump out facility shall be installed prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued by the Building Department. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Please return to the Building Department for a determination on the need for any other permits which may be required for this project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High water Mark: No fees due. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb CC: Bldg. Dept. Conservation Advisory Council Planning Board file VICTOR LESSARD �� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PRINCIPAL BUILDING INSPECTOR c1= r z P.O. Box 1 179 (516)765-1802 "a `t " r7l Southold, New York 11971 FAX(516)765-1823 ���, � �- OFFICE OF BIUILDING INSPECTOR TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 5, 1990 TO: Chairman, Z.B.A. Y FROM: BUILDING INSPECTOR' S OFFICE SUBJECT: INTERPRETATION The Building Department has applications for Building Permits and requests for certifications of site plans all the time. Reading the Z.B.A. decision of Port of Egypt Enterprises Inc. #3770, we are now interpreting the following. As refer- enced, in the d �1sion, under 7(E) thatA1t1 .191Yr�s' on- gidered , � of t -a. This certainly will aid toward certifications as to front yard, backyard setbacks of site plans and building permits. Now that the precedent is set, it would be to everyones benefit to put such a definition into the code and also consider the same status for Marine I Zone. CC. r Planning Board Town Board rAF i � J APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS t SCO {. OR Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman 'As�� '_► �� Charles Grigonis, Jr. O ?� !� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3770. Matter of the Application of the PORT 01. EGYPT .1WTJW�=SES, INC'S for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XII, Section 100-121C7 122, Article XXII (Section 100-239D as disapproved by the Building Inspector) for permission to construct boat storage building with f3(k and, in this Marine II (M-II) Zoning District. property location: Main Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 056, Block 04, 06, Lot 10.1, 11, 12.2, 3.2, 3 .3, 4, 6 .1. WHEREAS, public hearings were held on September, 21, 1989, December 19, 1989, February 1, 1990, and .larch 29, 1990; and WHEREAS, at said hearings all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present and previous zoning classifications, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: Page 2 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 , 1990 1. By this application, applicant is requesting variances to the zoning code as to area setbacks for the construction of a boat-storage building for the inside storage of boats, of various sizers " many (presently) stored at the premises out-of-doors and (presently) without appropriate screening or setbacks due to the existing nature of the buildings & uses of the premises under consideration. 2 . The premises in question is located on the south side of the Main Road (State Route 25) in the Hamlet and Town of Southold, contains ate ; .' r ) , and is more particularly identified on the Suffo k County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 056, Block 4, Lots 10.1, 11, 13 .2, and Section 056, Block 6, Lots 3.2, 3.3, 4, 6 .1. 3. The subject premises is located in the Kri ** ;f1nq District and is and has since prior to the enactment of the zoning ordinance in 1957beenused for outside boat storage, as well as marinas uses, retail and wholesale uses, engine and boat repairs, servicing, maintenance, sales to the general public, office use, restaurant use, fishing, and other marina and fishing station-type uses, and many accessory uses relative thereto. 4. The variances necessary in this project and requested by the applicant are as follows: building at the easterly yar area att TTWMm o=13 feet, (b) insufficient southerly setback from the proposed building to the inside of the bulkhead along the watersedge at a minimum of 38 feet (40 feet, more or less, to the outer edge of the existing bulkhead) . 5. The sections of the zoning code applicable are as follows under the current zoning code and master plan amendments as adopted: (a) sideyard variance - Article XII, Section 100-122 and Bulk Schedule; (b) setback from bulkhead - Article XXII, Section Page 3 - Appeal No. 37700 • Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 1990 6 . The buildin roposed herein is shown on the property and building plan r a 'low (a) the building to be of a six (b) thel ./� from the easterly property �.ineh"a "' ' point; 38 feet (to the bulkhead existing to the south (along the waters edge) ; minimum of 35 feet to the front property line at its closest point in accord- ance with the required setback of the code ; and approximately 59 feet to the westerly line along the basin (c) the existing metal building, sheds, restaurant building, docks, bulkheads, concrete slabs, ramps, office and T, x o, „ shop structure, �I "' 0*1 % ' as well as the proposed parking plan for all uses at the site. 7. For the record it is noted that: (a) the subject premises has been the subject of prior determinations by the Board of Appeals under: (1) Appl. No. 3086 rendered May 19 , 1983 - Denial to construct addition with an insufficient frontyard and for retail sales ; (2 ) Appl . No . 3481-SE and 3494 rendered May 28 , 1986 conditionally approving replacement of fuel storage tanks with insufficient setbacks ; (3 ) Appl . No . 3525 rendered July 31 , 1986 for Special Exception approval concerning location of fuel tanks . (b) this project is also under consideration by the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval under Article XXV of the Zoning Code, and as of this date, is still pending. (c) under the N.Y.S . Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) , this action for area setbacks has been deemed to be exempt as a Type II Action for coordination; however, such exemption does not prohibit or restrict any other department or agency to further evaluate or declare any other status under SEQRA. Page 4 - Appear go. 377u Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 1990 7. (d) subsequent to the filing of this application, applicant1' has amended the application to eliminate the necessity for a variance as to excessive lot coverage and as to reduced front yard setback. The percentage of lot coverage for all buildings, existing and proposed, and the r (e) all other areas of the bulk schedule will be, upon informa- tion and belief, in compliance with the zoning code, including the height of the proposed building, that being the vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the existing grade adjacent to the building (before any alteration or fill) to the mean height between eave (s) and ridge for roof types other than flat or mansard (or to the highest point of the roof for a flat or mansard roof) . (See HEIGHT in Section 100-13 Definitions, and bulk schedule height limitation at 35 feet in this M-II zone district) . 8. In considering the variances requested, the Board finds: (a) the amount of relief requested at to the side yard is subst net ; INS i `iIk "'* ', d, and the placement of the subject building will be/ at a greater setback than as exists ; (b) the unique characteristics of the land and its present conforming uses (such as outside boat storage and related outside activities) lend to the hinderance of better maneuverability of boats, better accessibility, minimizing overall congestion, better interior circulation, better parking and traffic accessways , and general good order and safety; (c) there is no alternative available for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (d) the practical difficlties are uniquely related to the Page 5 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 1990 i' land and are not personal to the applicant; (e) the relief, as granted and further noted below, will not in turn be adverse to the safelty, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (f) the relief, as granted and further noted below, will aid in minimizing overall congestion, help to improve interior circulation and aid to its general good order and safety of the public; (g) there will be no substantial adverse change in the character of this marine district; (h) strict application of the ordinance will, if the variance is denied, cause continued congestion and poor on-site circulation, and will hinder improvement to accessways for vehicles and pedestrians (without proper zoning restrictions and controls) ; (h) the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect of irr reased density or be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (i) Am wftaln ttic eastcriy a Adtrig.W or i' 41 1e3it (j) in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in considering all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variances, as further noted below. NOW, therefore, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was i a Page 6 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1, 1990 RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for a setback from the easterly side yard � . I 11,1111jo as applied ppeal No. 3770 in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. , SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the building be used as applied for boat storage only; 2. That the"size of the pr posed building be not larger than as applie s ,i "' 3. That th of coverage 4 for all buildings for the entire marina-restaurant site, excluding concrete slabs at 6" or less from ground level; ;,, 4. . - d Jill max` (specifically the parcel located along the north side of the Main Road in which the applicant has an interest as well as those parcels described, supra) t•° zo 5. That it is recommended that the building be of a color neutral to the aquatic surroundings so as to blend in(with the natural surroundings.) 6 . That the setbacks not be reduced to less than 15 feet at the easterly side property line and not less than 38 feet to the bulkhead (to the south) at its closest points at any time. OWN" som-0- Vote of the Board: `Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, Grigonis and Sawicki. Absent was : Member Doyen of Fishers Island. This resolution was duly adopted by unanimous vote of all members present. . - -GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIR4 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEAL Fat (51614710 vis January 27 , 1990 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board :,, Southold Town Hall l _ 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 - -- Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Dear Mr . Orlowski : As a result of the meeting with Robert Kassner in discussion on the drainage for the above referenced project , y ` ""' points wareviewe 1 . OF `Q1 Even though the roof drainage is clean rain water , it was explained by the writer that both the D. E. C . and Southold .qn Trustees felt very strongly that this s`tlbU°Tl R ,. .. , . . off' I°ts acid rain content , so as not to shock the adjacent Bay area . 2 . PARKING LOT RUN-OFF : The improvements over the present parking lot run-off , specifically the replacement of the paved area with crushed stone , the regrading of the slope so as to retain the drainage on site , and the install n of french drains were reviewed in detail . '" e Aa. .,� . : 11Py it was su Bested by the wpf'tdt^ that an *, inch diameter , e installed in the bottom one-third of the french drain . This installation would be similar to highway shoulder drai,n.� ei. p The ADS pipe would then be +� Yw fpr the roof drains and th6 m t Mr . Bennett orlownki Southold Town Planning Board January 27 , 1990 Page 2 3 . SURFACE DRAINAGE IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING OFFICE AND SHOP : The ground elevation in the area js a ro, lmately three ( 3 ) feet . It is also a ' stand the installation of leac Ing pools could no796 effective . The only work planned in this area is the removal of the paved surfaces and replaced with crushed stone to reduce and slow down surface run-off . It was explained that , with the roof run-off being collected and the parking lot run-off being collected , the only run-off in this area would be what actually fell on the site , which would be of a very small amount compared to what has resulted previous l i acn-4. 00 pools 7, r*,rrN1W area would not 6e a pr'ad' fd*2 ' sWl.0tfon . Based on the above telephon , #,% teas , it was suggested that x . Angj•u4 . ,a; no " h arain ,would ! Inc u e he following : I . Bench dIrtfn ko�vncl Nva _ #, ADS. slotted drainage pipe aatid pipett td"ttie �hing pools ; 2 . Fncrease the gravel .b ;ckfljl 4 t", leaching pools from three (31 feet to four (4) feet ; and 3 . / "p'1 construct"itm:" "" It is hoped that the above resolvement of the drainage questions will now make it possible for site plan approval to be received . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC . erl�Wiggin,; ZD. ,M. E . President cc : Mr. William Lieblien A. Barton Cass ��.; ;i•.. f '75u6FiLe- ��o��sUFFOI� c y Pe) o TRUSTEES y Z SCOTT L. HARRIS John M. Bredemeyer, III, President O yC Supervisor " Henry P. Smith, Vice President y�J�l �a�� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Albert J. Krupski, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 John L. Bednoski, Jr. John B. Tuthill Southold, New York 11971 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 i August 1, 1990 i Mr. Merlon Wiggin, President Peconic Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 672 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Port of Egypt Application / SCTM #1000-56-6-3 .2, 3 .3, 4 &6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: Please be advised that as per discussion at its the regular meeting on July 26, 1990, the Board of Trustees has determined that a submittal of an amended drawing of this project is required showing all wash down facilities on the site. Kindly contact this office should you have any questions in this matter. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III 1t1 } President, Board of Trustees JMB:jb cc: CAC Bldg Dept William Lieblein Planning Board SU eF LE' P(3 RK June 29 , 1990 Planning Board Gr Ll P7— Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Gentlemen, Enclosed is a copy of our lease with the New York State Department of Transportation for the property in front of Armando ' s for placement on our file. Sincerely, PORT OF EGYPT MARINE, INC. William H. Lieblein, Secty. ROW 75)110/891 NO.N° _ 06407 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Orig REAL ESTATE DIVISION Subs PERMIT FOR USE OF STATE-OWNED PROPERTY Air K Canal P,I•N, 5000. 00. 201 Inventory No. Permit Account 0-1354 i Property Location s/s MAIN ROAD, 2 , 150± FT E/0_ Canal Plate No. BAY HOME ROAD Project MATTITUCK—CREENPORT, PTS 1 & 3 Use Code C/MA Map No.(s) Parcel No.(s) County SUFFOLK Town SOUTHOLD City/Village SOUTHOLD THIS PERMIT, made this day of 19 90 between ` PORT OF EGYPT MARINE , INC . f MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD , NEW YORK 11971 hereinafter referred to as "Permittee", and the COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PEOPLE i OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, hereinafter referred to as "the State", i i WITNESSETH: WHEREAS the State is the owner of the above identified property; and WHEREAS the Permittee wishes to use and occupy said property; NOW, THEREFORE, the State hereby grants this permit to the Permittee, subject to the following covenants and cI conditions: I. The property covered by this permit shall be used only for the purpose of parkin¢ and boat Ig o ., p (age Akateb pg 3) I and for no other purpose whatsoever. 2. The fee to be charged shall be: S 275 per month beginning 4 / 1 /90 The Permittee understands and agrees that if the full amount of the fee as stated herein is not paid by the fifteenth day after it has become due, an additional late charge of two percent(2019)per month on the outstan- ding balance will be due and owing the State. i 3. Payment of fee is due on the first of the month unless otherwise stated. Fee must be paid by check,bank cashier's check or money order payable to "Department of Transportation" and mailed or delivered to: New York State Department of Transportation Revenue Unit, Building 3, Room 422 f 1220 Washington Avenue Albany, New York 12232 f Page I i 4. Permittee, at their expense and for the term of the permit, shall fur'is and show evidence of General Liability Insurance coverage issued by an insurance carrier licensed to do business in the State of New York for the protec- tion of the State of New York and Permittee against any claims, suits, demands or judgments by reason of bodily injury, including death, and for any claims resulting in property damage occurring on or in the proximity to the permit area. Such General Liability Insurance shall be in the amount no less than S 2 .000 .000. (combined property damage and/or bodily injury,including death)single limit per occurrence,and name the People of the State of New York'as an additional insured. The Permittee will furnish the State a certificate of insurance, with a (30) thirty day prior written notice of any cancellation or major change in the policy conditions.The Permit shall be voided if insurance is cancelled,modified or lapses. Approval of this permit shall be contingent upon receipt, by the State, of a copy of a properly executed insurance certificate. S. Permittee is responsible for any repairs,improvements or maintenance work of any kind on the property at Permit- tee's expense. The State may,at any time,periodically inspect the premises to determine whether same are in good repair and maintenance,structurally sound,and that there are no unsafe,hazardous,unsanitary,or defective condi- tions existing. 6. Permittee is responsible to maintain that the occupancy is in compliance with any and all applicable Federal,State, and local laws,ordinances,codes, rules and regulations affecting the use of the property. Permittee shall not con- duct or allow any use or activity on the premises inconsistent with law and shall not conduct or allow any use or activity on the premises which may require a permit or other approval by a government agency without having lawfully obtained such permit or approval. 7. All arrangements of services for utilities, removal of garbage,rubbish, litter,snow and ice will be made by the Per- mittee at the Permittees's expe-,se, unless hereafter specified. The State shall have no responsibility for providing any services not specifically set forth in writing herein. Permittee shall comply with all local and State building standards in the installation or repair of any utilities including but not limited to electricity and plumbing. Permittee is responsible for keeping and maintaining the premises herein in a safe and clean condition, for the regular and prompt removal of garbage, rubbish, litter, snow and ice. Permittee shall be responsible for preventing damages to the plumbing system and premises caused by lack of heat or water damage from leaks. 8. The State shall have no responsibility whatever for the loss or destruction of any improvements made by the Per- mittee or for personal property stored or being used on the premises. 9. Permittee hereby agrees to admit State representatives and prospective purchasers or permittees to examine these premises during reasonable business hours. 10. Permittee agrees to indemnify and save harmless the State from any claim or loss including legal expenses by reason C of the use or misuse of the premises under this permit and/or from any claim or loss by reason of any accident or damage to any person or property being on said premises caused by Permittee, its employees,agents or invitees. 11. This permit shall be automatically renewed for successive terms of one month each unless cancelled by either party. Cancellation by the State requires thirty (30) days written notice, except for cause, in which event cancellation can be required on ten(10)days written notice. Permitttee may cancel this permit by giving thirty(30)days written notice. 12. The parties acknowledge that this instrument is not a lease but is merely a permit to occupy and use and therefore a landlord-tenant relationship is not hereby created,and further,that since this is not a lease,Section 5-321 of the General Obligations Law does not apply to this permit to the extent permitted by law. 13. Permittee will not sublet the premises nor assign or transfer the Permit to any other parties in part or in whole without the prior written consent of the State. Failure to comply with this provision may result in ten (10) days written notice of cancellation of the Permit by the State,and the State may immediately take possession and ter- minate all rights of the Permittee as of such moment. Page 2 14. The Permittee understands and agrees that the fee charged by the State may periodically be updated to reflect fair market value and the Permittee will enter into a new permit for the new fee if it wishes to remain in occupancy. Failure to execute a new permit will require Permittee to immediately vacate the premises. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE PROVISIONS, CANAL PERMITS ALSO INCLUDE PARAGRAPHS 15 AND 16. 15. No alterations,excavations,improvements or modifications of any kind may be made to the Canal lands or system without express written permission from the State in the form of a Canal Work Permit. I 16. Unlesi express written permission is granted to the Permittee by the State, no permanent buildings,structures or additions to existing buildings or structures will be allowed on the Canal lands or system. Any existing buildings at the time of the issuance of the permit shall be used for seasonal occupancy only. 17. Additional Provisions to Permit, if any: SEE ATTACHED RIDER FOR PROVISIONS 18 thru 24 N 240 i t � 1 � I � I 'S'o'yo ,f I II Page 3 i ACCEPTANCE: In consideration of the granting of the Permit, the undersigned accepts all of the above terms,conditiorililand provisions. Signed v FOR INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On the day of 19_ , before me personally came to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. (Notary Public) 1 FOR CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On the day of I'n?R 19 before me personally came WILLJ Rm to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that they reside at l�f CC ?✓TRnL- Ryrrlyul-- /, n� in OR that they are the Ye(f qty of the corporation described in and whic t executed the foregoing instrument; that they signed their name thereto by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation. (Notary Public) NoterY Pubft State Of New Yw No,52-2162100 RECOMMENDED: Qualffled in Suffolk CoutKY Regional Real Estate Officer Date Term re 31,19W j APPROVED: Commissioner of Transportation for the People of The State of New York By Director, Real Estate Division Date Page,t w� ROW 75j ( 10/89) RIDER Page 1 of REAL ESTATE GROUP - REGION 10 RIDER TO PERMIT FOR USE OF STATE-OWNED PROPERTY The attached provisions are a full and integrated portion of the Permit Agreement, with the Permittee, Port of Egypt Marine, Inc . ; Permit Account Number 0-1354: 18 The Permittee acknowledges the State 's right to collect security deposit. The State hereby acknowledges receipt/ � ��I///vvv/// of two hundred and seventy--five dollars ($275), a sum W equal to one month 's permit charges . This sum will be retained as security deposit to insure faithful performance of. the Permit, and compliance with all terms by the Permittee . The State is not obligated to apply the deposit on any outstanding permit fees or other charges in arrears or on damages for the Permittee 's failure to fully perform the permit. The State may, at its sole discretion, exercise the option of applying the security to outstanding obligations of the Permittee, without prejudice or effect upon the right to immediate possession of the premises for the reasons stated elsewhere in the permit or for nonpayment of the permit fees . The security deposit held in connection with this permit will be held in an account maintained by the Comptroller, State of New York . The sum held on deposit shall not accrue any interest. The Permittee shall be entitled to complete repayment of the original sum on deposit at the end of the lease, provided : that there are no outstanding charges or arrears; and that all the terms of the permit have been faithfully and fully performed; and that the State having a reasonable time to inspect j the premises finds that the Permittee has not damaged the buildings, structures and/or grounds; and provided that any and all keys and/or copies thereof ( if any) are returned to the State . On termination of the Permit, provided the above conditions have been met, the Permittee will receive the original sum on deposit unless the parcel is sold by the State . If the parcel is sold by the State, the security deposit may be transferred to the new owner of the reversion and the State will. have no further obligations to the Permittee regarding the security deposit, or the State, at its option, may simply return the original sum on deposit to the Permittee . 19 Permittee agrees and understands that the State is under \ no obligation to sell the property to• the permittee and that no commitment, expressed or implied, is made by the State to give the permittee any preemptive right: of purchase . -ROW 75G (3/88) RIDER Page 2 of 2 RIDER TO PERMIT FOR USE OF STATE-OWNED PROPERTY REAL ESTATE GROUP - REGION 10 20. Any improvements made on this property will be made at the permittee 's expense, who shall not be compensated for same by the State . At the State 's discretion, the permittee may have to remove any and all improvements they have erected on this State owned land at their expense . If the State requests the removal of the improvements made by the permittee and compliance is not forthcoming within ten days of formal written notice, the State will have the improvements removed and any/all charges will be paid by the Permittee . 21 . Any trees or shrubs planted on this property shall be at the permittee 's expense and at the termination of the permit. shall become the property of the State . 22. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties that the Permittee will not be entitled to any relocation benefits provided under Federal and State law. 23. Permittee shall not place or store, or allow others to place or store, any flammable, explosive, hazardous, toxic or corrosive material, debris of any description, garbage or any material commonly referred to as " junk" within the permit area except fuel kept in the fuel tanks of legally parked vehicles allowed under the terms of this permit . Failure to comply with this provision may result in a ten ( 10) day notice of cancellation of the permit in accordance with Provision 11 of the permit . 24. The Permittee understands that a Highway Work Permit must be obtained from the Traffic Permits Unit prior to any construction on the site. i r oS�EFOIk�OG PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSSCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman to Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. / Richard G. Ward I� Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 June 15, 1990 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, New York 11944 RE: Port of Egypt proposed Boat Storage SCTM#1000-56-4-10.1, 11 and 13 .2 SCTM#1000-56-6-3 .2, 3 .3, 4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has recently received a copy of the Appeals Board decision on your request for variance, Appeal No. 33770. All conditions of the variance must be incorporated into revised plans which must be submitted to the Planning Board before it can proceed with its review. Copies of the revised maps dated April 11, 1990 will be needed. Your application before the Trustees is still pending. If the pipe from the boat wash down area is not permitted by the Trustees to empty into the bay, this revision will also have to be on the final maps. If you have any questions or require further assistance please contact this office. Very truly yours, /f Bennett Orlowski, Jr. v s Chairman cc: John Bredemeyer, III , President, Board of Trustees Victor Lessard, Principal Building Inspector 28A. F� , =�. . � SubFilX✓ P6 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS j 1 ��`' rn SCO vuls�& Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H. Sawicki Southold, New York 11971 James Dinizio, Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 ACTION OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3770. Matter of the Application of the PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XII, Section 100-121C- 122, Article XXII (Section 100-239D as disapproved by the Building Inspector) for permission to construct boat storage building with insufficient setbacks and excessive lot coverage in this Marine II (M-II) Zoning District. Property location: Main Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 056, Block 04, 06, Lot 10.1, 11, 12 .2, 3.2, 3.3, 4, 6 . 1. WHEREAS, public hearings were held on September- 21, 1989, December 19, 1989, February 1, 1990, and March 29, 1990 ; and WHEREAS, at said hearings all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present and previous zoning classifications, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following Findings of Fact: 'f Page 2 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 , 1990 1. By this application, applicant is requesting variances to the zoning code as to area setbacks for the construction of a boat-storage building for the inside storage of boats, of various sizes. ., many (Presently) stored at the premises out-of-doors and (presently) without appropriate screening or setbacks due to the existing nature of the buildings & uses of the premises under consideration. 2 . The premises in question is located on the south side of the Main Road (State Route 25) in the Hamlet and Town of Southold, contains a total site area of 4.96 acres (216, 058 sq, ft.) , and is more particularly identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 056, Block 4, Lots 10.1, 11, 13.2, and Section 056, Block 6, Lots 3.2, 3.3, 4, 6 .1. 3. The subject premises is located in the M-II Marine Zone District and is and has since prior to the enactment of the zoning ordinance in 1957beenused for outside boat storage, as well as marinas uses, retail and wholesale uses, engine and boat repairs, servicing, maintenance, sales to the general public, office use, restaurant use, fishing, and other marina and fishing station-type uses, and many accessory uses relative thereto. 4. The variances necessary in this project and requested by the applicant are as follows: (a) insufficient sideyard setback for the proposed building at the easterly yard area at a minimum of 15 feet, and (b) insufficient southerly setback from the proposed building to the inside of the bulkhead along the watersedge at a minimum of 38 feet (40 feet, more or less, to the outer edge of the existing bulkhead) . 5 . The sections of the zoning code applicable are as follows under the current zoning code and master plan amendments as adopted: (a) sideyard variance - Article XII, Section 100-122 and Bulk Schedule ; (b) setback from bulkhead - Article XXII, Section Page 3 - Appea*o. 3770 • • • Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. becision Rendered May 1 1990 6 . The building as proposed herein is shown on the property and building plan lastly dated April 11, 1990, and shows : (a) the building to be of a size 203 feet by 125 feet; (b) the setbacks of the proposed building to be 15 feet from the easterly property line at its closest point; 38 feet (to the bulkhead existing to the south (along the waters edge) ; minimum of 35 feet to the front property line at its closest point in accord- ance with the required setback of the code; and approximately 59 feet to the westerly line along the basin (c) the existing metal building, sheds, restaurant building, docks, bulkheads, concrete slabs, ramps, office and shop structure, and four existing buildings which are to be removed, as well as the proposed parking plan for all uses at the site. 7. For the record it is noted that: (a) the subject premises has been the subject of prior determinations by the Board of Appeals under: (1) Appl. No. 3086 rendered May 19 , 1983 - Denial to construct addition with an insufficient frontyard and for retail sales ; (2 ) Appl . No. 3481-SE and 3494 rendered May 28 , 1986 conditionally approving replacement of fuel storage tanks with insufficient setbacks ; (3) Appl . No. 3525 rendered July 31 , 1986 for Special Exception approval concerning location of fuel tanks . (b) this project is also under consideration by the Southold Town Planning Board for site plan approval under Article XXV of the Zoning Code, and as of this date, is still pending. (c) under the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) , this action for area setbacks has been deemed to be exempt as a Type II Action for coordination; however, such exemption does not prohibit or restrict any other department or agency to further evaluate or declare any other status under SEQRA. Page 4 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 1990 7. (d) subsequent to the filing of this application, applicant has amended the application to eliminate the necessity for a variance as to excessive lot coverage and as to reduced front yard setback. The percentage of lot coverage for all buildings, existing and proposed, is shown to be 29.910% (64,615 sq, ft.) , and the maximum permitted under the zoning code in this zone district is 30%. (e) all other areas of the bulk schedule will be, upon informa- tion and belief, in compliance with the zoning code, including the height of the proposed building, that being the vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the existing grade adjacent to the building (before any alteration or fill) to the mean height between eave (s) and ridge for roof types other than flat or mansard (or to the highest point of the roof for a flat or mansard roof) . (See HEIGHT in Section 100-13 Definitions, and bulk schedule height limitation at 35 feet in this M-II zone district) . S. In considering the variances requested, the Board finds: (a) the amount of relief requested at to the side yard is substantial at 10 feet; however the buildings now existing along the easterly yard area substantially nonconforming as to setbacks will be removed, and the placement of the subject building will be at a greater setback than as exists ; (b) the unique characteristics of the land and its present conforming uses (such as outside boat storage and related outside activities) lend to the hinderance of better maneuverability of boats, better accessibility, minimizing overall congestion, better interior circulation, better parking and traffic accessways, and general good order and safety: (c) there is no alternative available for appellant to pursue other than a variance; (d) the practical difficlties are uniquely related to the Page 5 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1 1990 land and are not personal to the applicant; (e) the relief, as granted and further noted below, will not in turn be adverse to the safelty, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (f) the relief, as granted and further noted below, will aid in minimizing overall congestion, help to improve interior circulation and aid to its general good order and safety of the public; (g) there will be no substantial adverse change in the character of this marine district; (h) strict application of the ordinance will, if the variance is denied, cause continued congestion and poor on-site circulation, and will hinder improvement to accessways for vehicles and pedestrians (without proper zoning restrictions and controls) ; (h) the variance will not in turn cause a substantial effect of irn reased density or be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience or order of the town; (i) the existing nonconformities of the existing buildings within the easterly yard areas will be eliminated; (j) in view of the manner in which the difficulty arose and in considering all of the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the variances, as further noted below. - NOW, therefore, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was n Page 6 - Appeal No. 3770 Matter of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC. Decision Rendered May 1. 1990 RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested for a setback from the easterly sideyard at 15 feet and for a setback from the existing bulkhead at its closest point at 38 feet, as applied under Appeal No. 3770 in the Matter of the Application of PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISES, INC., SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. That the building be used as applied for boat storage only; 2. That the size of the proposed building be not larger than as applied (203 ' by 125 ' ) ; 3. That the lot coverage not exceed thirty (30%) percent, for all buildings for the entire marina-restaurant site, excluding concrete slabs at 6 " or less from ground level; 4. That the parking plan included all properties owned jointly and/or separately to provide for additional parking (specifically the parcel located along the north side of the Main Road in which the applicant has an interest as well as those parcels described, supra) . 5. That it is recommended that the building be of a color neutral to the aquatic surroundings so as to blend in(with the natural surroundings .) 6 . That the setbacks not be reduced to less than 15 feet at the easterly side property line and not less than 38 feet to the bulkhead (to the south) at its closest points at any time. 7. All roof runoff be retained in leaching basins. - Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Dinizio, Grigonis and Sawicki. Absent was : Member Doyen of Fishers Island. This resolution was duly adopted by unanimous vote of all members present. _-GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIR SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEA 1 F. M. Flynn ia Or P . 0 . Box 144 PB Southold , H . Y. 11971 S'wr� May 5 , 1990 Town Roard ID Town of Southold _ Tot-in Ball Main Road ^;outhold , 11. Y . 11971 Members of the Board : I enclose a copy of a brochure and price list being ddistributed in the Town of Southold . It provides further proof of the arrogant presumption on the part of marina operators that passage pf the proposed amendment to reduce parking requirements has been assured . As I attempted to inform the Board , this proposed amendment has town-wide and cumulative effects . Consider the effect of this type of operation on tthe appearance and quality of life in a town whose character you seek , ostensibly, to preserve . This represents just one more attempt to "trash" the Town of .Southold . Just as we have seen the proliferation of Herz style Rent - A - Car operations on Long Island , the marina operators intend clearly to make Southold the franchised Rent - A - Boat capital of the East End . In return for the ruthless exploitation and destruction of our irreplacahle natural resources , diminution in value of nearby propertiesand the complete disregard of the health, safety and welfare of residents , an attempt has been made to lull us ' by specious claims of economic benefit to the town. The Port of Egypt was granted , under highly questionable circumstances , a number of variances which actually constitute a change of zoning. Tn return for launching 160 additional boats into already overcrowded Budd ' s Pond , erecting structures which approximately double the plot coverage permitted by the Zoning Code, and creating hazards from the storage of fire and explosion prone boats in direct proximity to places of public assembly, the applicant stated the applicant stated this outrageous project would create two additional. jobs . In the ca:>e of this franchise operation , the out-of-state franchiser would skim his profits off the top . The marina operators would profit, personally from the additional profits created . Very little Would trickle down to other businesses in the town . Profits having been increased , the emerging trend is to sell these operations to large out-of-town,,.._cor�oxatipns or conglomerates . The next step is the sale of `d''rcki6g facilities as condominiums . MAY 8 1990 Renters of boats spend little outside the marina premises . By and large , they are day-trippers . As the brochure indicates , they have little need for marine supplies. Even then, my experience has been they buy by mail , or from discount oulets to the west. They bring their food and beverages with them. Again , as the bro,$ure indicates , they are likely to spend most of their time on the water. Thus , they contribute little to the town ' s economy , but they do add to the pollution and congestion in Southold ' s waters . This class of boat , despite statements made to the contrary, Is one of the worst sourcos of pollution . How many of these small open boats are equipped w th marine "heads"? Typically , their engines discharge oilJP "I ectly into the water. Also, they are high-speed boats generally operated by the least experienced boatmen creating hazards to navigationl safety . The Board has never faced the question of noise pollution, particularly itss effects on neighboring residential properties . These owners are , by law, entitled to the quiet use and enjoyment of their properties . This type of operation would result in a quantum increase in vehicular traffic . These boats would have to be bottom-washed after each launching. Has the Board considered the effect on our critical water supply arising from the demands of several thousand additional boats? I note that fir . Harris has been quoted to the effect that there are two sides to the problem. This much is true . On the one side we have the sheer greed of marina operators motivated by nothing except increased profits . On the other side we have the rights of all other property owners including those whose residential properties would be devalued . The future of the environment and the nature of the town ' s future development is at stake . ?low do these factors weigh in the balance? After years in which the town consulted solely with marina operators , the residents have been given scant chance to express their opposition . Due to the town-wide dispersion of these facilities and their massive cumulative effects , an impartial GEIS is indicated at the very least. Only then would the full impact of the proposed parking amendment , which encourages this type of exploitation , be exposede to the pulic for its scrutiny . l� NEW SUFFOLK SHIPYARD, INC. New Suffolk 12oad, New Suffolk, New York 11956 0 Telephone (516) 734-6311 RAX (516)-734-6246 1990 CLUB NAUTICO RENTAL SCHEDULE RATES PULL DAY CHARTER 11EMBER STANDARD 17 ' - 22 ' Power Boats Weekdays $ 129 .00 $ 219 .00 Weekends & Holidays 169 .00 259 . 00 HALF-DAY CHARTER PIEMBER STANDARD 17 ' - 22 ' Power Boats Weekdays $ 99 . 00 $ 169 . 00 Weekends & Holidays 129 .00 199 . 00 CLUB NAUTICO ( 516) 734-5052 PULL SERVICE MARINA IN BOA ItD& OUTROA IID IMPAIRS•IIULI.ItFIPAIRS& IIGFIN 15111 NG•IN DOOR/OUTDOO It STORA GF-SLIPS& GAS DOCK•BOAT RENTALS I Rent someuung pricellebb. Like the freedom of the sea.The fun of fishing: r( The adventure of diving.The joy of being on the water with family and friends.And do it prac- tically rat-ti ally whenever you want,and wherever you want.With the carefree,money-saving conven- ience of Club Nautico"Powerboat Rental Centers. Now you can enjoy the priceless thrills of boating- fishing,cruising,diving,snorkeling,and water skiing- - whenever the mood suits you,at a price that's so affordable it will surprise you.With Nature's water- ways as your playground,you'll experience the romance and excitement of leaving the world in your �^ wake and riding the waves to new horizons. You can experience these boating pleasures as a ?. member and enjoy up to 50%off every time you ftii x rent.Or,if you prefer,as a renter at standard rates. ®+i The choice is up to you. F i If b' 15 t1 Just come aboard Club Nautico. Club Nautico is the fastest growing c:etwork of national_ powerboat rental centers in t_e_cuuntrLWith our -- — stylish, multi-purpose,multi-million dollar fleet of spar- kling new,fully equipped powerboats,each Center offers a selection of boats that appeals to boaters in that area. Rent famous brand name boats like Four Winns; Chris-Craft'Hydra-Sports' and Donzi, with reliable brand name outboard motors like lohnson and Evinrude. Everything must perform to Club Nautico's demanding standards-standards that meet those of its parent compap OM-C,-one of the largest an�ost respected names in the boating industn and the comparr that takes the world boating'. i CNsG - a^,e a,,enm strac ,,entered Iwe.a rx Ov - t Ind w r,es.Im I . .. °A. .9!Sri:'r:�e'-'Eai:�.sbKaii•+sn:iiip,N.. There's probably a Club Nautico Powerboat Rental Center closer than you think. Club Nautico has all kinds of convenient waterfront locations at marinas,yacht clubs,and prime boating facilities across the country and the Caribbean-a claim no other powerboat rental company can make. What's more,additional U.S.locations are on the way,with a number of sites also planned at popular international locations.So wherever you are,chances are you're close to a Club Nautico'"Powerboat Rental Center. Which means you can take off with Club Nautico almost as fast as you can slip on a captain's hat or into a bathing suit. All you have to do is lift your finger. lust call ahead and reserve the size and type of boat you want.Club Nautico's experienced staff will take care of all the details for you,including liability insur- ance,a full fuel tank,safety package,navigation chiF g, Full size boats. arida checklist of all maintenance an l convenience items.Which means you can spend all your time on Bikini rates. the water ia coca"the dock. Membership privileges. Each Cluubb Nautico'`Powerboat Rental Center has a Cruise Director who'll tell you where the area's best If you're hooked on boating,a Club Nautico member- boating destinations are,and how to get there.Plus, ship is a"must join."To enjoy all the membership assorted sports equipment for fishing,scuba diving, benefits,all you have to do is fill out our simple snorkeling,and water skiing is available at reasonable application form,and pay an initiation fee and modest rental rates at many locations.The toll free numbers annual dues.Once you're a member,you'll enjoy full to call for additional information or for the Center membership privileges at every Club Nautico location. nearest you are: Plus,you'll receive discounted member rental In Florida: 1-800-BOAT RENT rates tup to 504/off regular rates),a complimentary subscription to our exclusive Cruise News newsletter, U.S.A.: 1-800-NAUTICO with articles on safety tips, news about new Center locations,and other items of interest to every boater. Plus,we offer auto rental discounts,vacation destina- tion discounts,airline discounts,special excursion rates,overnight powerboat rentals,and much more. We have several we rent sometiung else tnars convenient membership priceless: Peace of mind! p In addition to quality options for you boats and outboard motors which we to choose from. stantiy inspect and n It all starts with an initiation fee of$279,plus annual maintain,we include dues depending on the membership program that all the required Coast best suits your situation.Simply select the member- 'Guard approved ship alternative that's most convenient and most safety equipment economical for you: at no extra charge. •INDIVIDUAL MEMBERSHIP:$280 per year. We also continuously •FAMILY MEMBERSHIP:For only$420,two members monitor you by VHF of the same family can sign up at the same time, — marine radio,so providing savings of$419. you're only a radio •EXECUTIVE MEMBERSHIP:Or for$840 per year, call away should you ever need assistance. you can let others(21 years or older)use your And you,your family and guests can enjoy all company's membership card.It's a wonderful way your time together on the water with confidence, to say"thank you"to an important customer, knowing that you're fullyprotected by Club Nautico's and to valued employees for a"job well done." liability insurance policy,at every rental center. •CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP: If you wish to have From our coastal locations,the policy extends to additional company membership cards issued,they 15 miles offshore! are readily available for only$420 each. Club Nautico lets you try a lot of different boats before you decide to buy. The modest cost of a Club Nautico membership is a wise investment. And,if you plan to own your own boat someday,Club Nautico gives you the opportunity to try different size and style boats to see which is best for your boating interests. Whether it's a get-away day,an ongoing member- ship,or a chance to test drive the boat of your v dreams,y(A!;?only a toll free telephone call away for him • additional information or for the name of the Center nearest you.Our friendly, knowledgeable crew is ready to welcome you aboard. cam" r RECEIVED P�/I� IS `; QI / —11,)-j r.... -,_.b May 2, 1990 Southold Town Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Members of the Town Board, I am writing to urge you to reject Chapter 100 of the code of the town of Southold which amends the zoning section 100-191(A) . I feel it is unnecessary to permit an increase in storage- parking spaces for boats in the marinas for many reasons. The increase in spaces may allow an increase in the number of boats in the future which will burden the traffic problems. In addition you will be threatening the existence of landing opportunities for the threatened fishing industry.as the marinas become more populated with pleasure boats. Rather than considering the requests of a few marina owners I believe it is the responsibility of the town board members to consider the future impact on the environment including the water and land environment. You have been chosen to be our stewards and we hope we can trust that you will take this responsibility seriously. Yours truly, /a� Molly B wn Mrs.Dirrk Brown A O.Bos 57 Orient,N. Y.11957 y4 " MAY 419% S L.SLi iP n f Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)7 65-19 38 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 7, 1990 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. 1 Bootleg Alley Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10.1, 11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3 .2, 3.3, 4 & 6. 1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has reviewed your letter dated January 27, 1990, in which you request site plan approval. Please be advised that site plan approval cannot be granted by the Planning Board until the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Trustees have made determinations on the applications before them. The Board is reviewing the proposed drainage plan changes with the Board of Trustees. Changes to the final map may be required before Planning Board approval. If you have any questions or require further information please contact this office. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr." Chairman rk } � Town Hall. 53095 Main Road "O P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: February 1, 1990 RE: Port of Egypt SCTM# 1000-56-6-6. 1 The following is in response to your request of January 29, 1990 for comments on Appeal No. 3770 Port of Egypt. The Planning Board has asked the Town Engineer to review the drainage calculations in light of test hole data recently submitted by the applicant. (See attached report) . The Board is also trying to clarify the Trustee' s position relative to 1) . the possible discharge of roof and wash down waste water into the bay and to 2) . the need for a Trustee permit for same. (See attached correspondence) . Until these issues are resolved the Planning Board suggests that the hearing be kept open inasmuch as additional information may arise out of these coordination efforts. cc: John Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees Encl. � • fiX; -: -->-�. • • ♦C VS ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR.,, .' `." =--' SHONE (5161:65.1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III . President 7 j. JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. ��• 'n :;.\".G'II - HENRY P. ShIITH, Vice President j John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOV'N TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 1101 TO: Bennett Orlowski, OR. , Chairman Town Planning Board FROM: John Bredemeyer, III, President DATE: January 8, 1990 Subject: Discharges to surface waters (all) Port of Egypt Enterprises (by reference to your memo of December 28, 89) . While the discharge of storm water flows themselves are not directly regulated by chapter 97 of the Town Code, the Trustees always require containment when activities in the regulated adjacent 75 ' area contains sufficient impervious surface to generate flows. The seemingly informal handwritten position of Henry Smith and myself was the end result of all Board members being requested to comment on this project. In fact the comments were written by Mr. Smith not myself . However, the Board has again reviewed its position at the regular monthly meeting of January 25, 1990 and concurs that "all" roof runoff should be contained in dry wells. Several important reasons why this is imperative follow: 1. Absent the constant inflow of freshwaters as seen in the typical estuary, the bulkheaded marina environment will likely experience wild salinity fluctuations with direct discharge. The immediate effect may be the lysis of countless pelagic larvae of beneficial organisms (clams, scallops and their food) which may be passing through the area. 2 . The water quality of rainfall reaching Long Island in recent times should not be confused with "distilled" water quality one might expect. Chemical analysis by recent research indicates our rainfall is highly acidified (Ph valves less than four are common) and nutrient enriched with high levels of nitrates and sulfa7PLAWIN'r n--- greater than 1ppm nitrogen is seen. Itsome sewage treatment processes are approaching this level of treatment. Even so, nitrogen levels of more than .S ppm may be excessive in the marine environment over time. Supportive data from Brookhaven Lab and S.E.D.H.S as well as others is available. Althoug; debatable, any unnecessary push of marina cuaters-out of their confines may cause a peak in form levels or other pollutants in nearby waters. 3 . Certainly the practicality of containment of 100% may be unrealistic for certain storm events but in no case should an event of more then 2" - 3" per hour be discharged. The 208 study recommendations were for full containment for the better part of a half hour or more. SIDNEY S. EOWNE & SON Sidney B.Bowne.P.E..L.S. Roland And( (1922.19591 �'�• Francis J.Ly Chester C. Kelsey,P.E., L.S. �" Pnillip Schlo Robert A.Stanton.P E, 45 Manor Road Robert W.Brown.L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 �7 Joseph F.St 2abdiel A. Blackman, P.E..L.S. 11 I ( William T.51 Frank J.Antetomaso,P.E. 1516) 72 -0611 q Richard B.V George A.Style.P.E. r4Cj S I— '•i Jerry D.Almont.P.E. George L.Fagan.Jr.,Ph.D.•P.E. -' Frank Capobianco, C.E. yL't1;;4'_}t D:1 Paul F.Stevens.P.E. PLh"1PIli•iG' '' ^ � Roger L.Cocchi. P.E. -- December 14, 1989 Thomas R. Pynchon.L.S. Mr.. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11911 Re: Port of Egy4p82tSite Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. 8877 ) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal waters. Since roof runoff is relatively free of } OK contaminants we would recommend that the overflow system be allowed as indicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. . Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:cIq A. BARTON CASS, P.E. cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA• • SMITHTOWN 'W NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An EguFl OPPoduNry EmproYa M/FM Town Hall. 53095 'Main Road P.O. Box 1 179 ��� --,sWyk Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOIVN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Frank Kujawski, JR. President Town Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman DATE: December 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10.1,11 & 13 .2 1000-56-6-3 . 2 ,3. 3 , 4 & 6.1 Reference is made to your October 26, 1989 informal comments regarding the above referenced project, (copy enclosed) . The applicant proposes to discharge both roof storm water and boat wash down waste water into the boat basin. The Planning Board does not see a problem with the roof storm water being discharged directly through leaching basins into tidal waters because this water would not came into contact with contaminants or pollutants in the parking area. But the Board does not want boat wash down waste water being discharged directly into tidal waters. The Board would like the Trustees' position with regard to both the roof water and the wash down water being discharged into tidal waters. The Board would appreciate your Board' s official comments regarding this project. We have in our possession what appears to be informal handwritten comments that were dictated by Mr. Bredemeyer. Do the Trustees have Jurisdiction over the discharge area, if so, does the applicant require a permit? Enclosed for your information is the Town Engineer' s report dated December 14, 1989 . 10,a"'Z41 Gk� - 'Ate .� -�41 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 `ly TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: John Bredemeyer III, President Board of Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman DATE: January 30, 1990 RE: Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10.1, 11 & 13 .2 1000-56-6-3.2, 3.3 , 4 & 6,1 Reference is made to your memorandum of January 8, 1990 in which you state that "all" roof runoff water should be contained in dry wells for the above referenced project. However, in item number three of your memo you state, "Certainly the practicability of containment of 1000 of roof runoff may be unrealistic for certain storm events but in no case should an event of more than, (I believe you meant less than) , 2" - .3" per hour be discharged." The Port of Egypt drainage plan as revised April 5, 1989 indicates that the roof water from a five year storm ( 2. 00 plus inches in one hour) will be more than totally contained on site. Only water in excess of a 2" plus per hour storm will be discharged into the bay. Your Board did not comment on the Planning Board' s question as to its position relative to the boat wash down waste water. This waste water will pass through a sedimentation and oil separation basin and two leaching pools before being discharged into the bay. These two leaching pools were requested previously by the Planning Board. The attached boat wash down calculations may be helpful in determining your response. The Board feels that with regular maintenance and clean out the discharge will be minimal. Encl. FEL - 1 - � ,=1 T • _ 7" I f=: t_ I h1 r ,_�1 F• 1_I T�F• ECON(C ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One BooticyAlley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,Nw York 11944 (516)477.0030 Fax(516)4770198 January 22 , 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold. L. 1 . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Bout Storage Building scTM // 1000-56-4-10 . 1 , 11 7 13 . 2 0 .1000-36-3 . 2 . . 3 . 4 & 6 , 1 Dear Planning Board Members ; Aa per your request : Maximum Nurnhor of Boats Washed Per Day - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 Gallons of Water par Wash - - - - - - - - 2 - 3 Gal lone Gallons of Water per Day - - - - - - - - 240 Gallons Leaching Pool Capacity - - - - - - - - - Approximately 2 , 400 Gallons Each Total for 2 Pools - - - - - - - - 4 , 800 Gallons Respectfully submlted. PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . Marlon E . Wiggin . P' ,� M. F . (/ President _ MEW/ iw PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootle9Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 January 27 , 1990 n. Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman ,�pN311990 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Dear Mr. Orlowski : As a result of the meeting with Robert Kassner in discussion on the drainage for the above referenced project , a telephone call was made to Barton Cass of Sidney B . Bowne & Son , and the following points were reviewed : 1 . ROOF DRAINAGE : Even though the roof drainage is clean rain water , it was explained by the writer that both the D. E . C. and Southold Town Trustees felt very strongly that this should be contained on site and released slowly because of its acid rain content , so as not to shock the adjacent Bay area . 2 . PARKING LOT RUN-OFF : The improvements over the present parking lot run-off , specifically the replacement of the paved area with crushed stone , the regrading of the slope so as to retain the drainage on site , and the installation of french drains were reviewed in detail . Because of the concern that the french drain , over a period of time , might be clogged with silt , it was suggested by the writer that an ADS slotted drainage pipe , eight (8) inch diameter , be installed in the bottom one-third of the french drain . This installation would be similar to highway shoulder drainage design . The ADS pipe would then be piped to the leaching pools for the roof drains and the leaching pools capacity would be enlarged by extra surrounding backfilling of stone material . • A$ • Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board January 27 , 1990 Page 2 3 . SURFACE DRAINAGE IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING OFFICE AND SHOP : The ground elevation in the area is approximately three ( 3 ) feet . It is also a highly compacted clay area , and the installation of leaching pools could not be effective . The only work planned in this area is the removal of the paved surfaces and replaced with crushed stone to reduce and slow down surface run-off . It was explained that , with the roof run-off being collected and the parking lot run-off being collected , the only run-off in this area would be what actually fell on the site , which would be of a very small amount compared to what has resulted previously . Based on this discussion , it was collectively agreed that installation of leaching pools for this area would not be a practical solution . Based on the above telephone discussion with Mr . Cass , it I was suggested that Planning Board approval to include a notation by the Planning Board that the french drain would include the following : 1 . French drain to include installation of ADS slotted drainage pipe and piped to the leaching pools ; 2 . Increase the gravel backfill of the leaching pools from three ( 3 ) feet to four (4 ) feet ; and 3 . These changes would be included on the as-built site plan after construction . It is hoped that the above resolvement of the drainage questions will now make it possible for site plan approval to be received . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . erlon E . Wien,/ h� . D. ,M. E. President cc : Mr. William Lieblien A. Barton Cass JO 3 100 1••S-t�Ttiiitis , PFPAISI��S?ti6>3JX�91FF?9R?5 F{refidA24iK ~� l ALBERT J. KRUPSKI. JR.,XW*4rf49&a�btr TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III . President y1 > r � (516):65-1892 . JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. Atsv y HENRY P. SMITH, Vice President - John B. Tuthill BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 738 Soutliold, New York 11971 TO: Bennett Orlowski, JR. , Chairman Town Planning Board FROM: John Bredemeyer, III, President DATE: January 8, 1990 Subject: Discharges to surface waters (all) Port of Egypt Enterprises (by reference to your memo of December 28, 89) . While the discharge of storm water flows themselves are not directly regulated by chapter 97 of the Town Code, the Trustees always require containment when activities in the regulated adjacent 75 ' area contains sufficient impervious surface to generate flows. The seemingly informal handwritten position of Henry Smith and myself was the end result of all Board members being requested to comment on this project. In fact the comments were written by Mr. Smith not myself . However, the Board has again reviewed its Position at the regular monthly meeting of January 25, 1990 and concurs that "all" roof runoff should be contained in dry wells. Several important reasons why this is imperative follow: 1 . Absent the constant inflow of freshwaters as seen in the typical estuary, the bulkheaded marina environment will likely experience wild salinity fluctuations with direct discharge. The immediate effect may be the lysis of countless pelagic larvae of beneficial organisms (clams, scallops and their food) which may be passing through the area. 2 . The water quality of rainfall reaching, Long Island in recent times should not be confused with "distilled" water quality one might expect. Chemical analysis by recent research indicates our rainfall is highly acidified (Ph valves less than four are common) and nutrient enriched with high levels of nitrates and sulfa greater than 1ppm nitrogen is seen. It i u ome i 1 0 1990 SOZ11r)L', PLANNINB� - • r , +r sewage treatment processes are approaching this level of treatment. Even so, nitrogen levels of more than .5 ppm may be excessive in the marine environment over time. Supportive data from Brookhaven Lab and S.E.D.H.S as well as others is available. Altho�u�g9h debatable, any unnecessary push of marina cuaters-)out of their confines may cause a peak in form levels or other pollutants in nearby waters. 3 . Certainly the practicality of containment of 100% may be unrealistic for certain storm events but in no case should an event of more then 2" - 3" per hour be discharged. The 208 study recommendations were for full containment for the better part of a half hour or more. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road x Y P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 11971 ,U r TELEPHONE (5 16) 7 65-19 38 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Frank Kujawski, JR. President Town Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman DATE: December 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10. 1,11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3 . 2 , 3 .3 , 4 & 6. 1 Reference is made to your October 26, 1989 informal comments regarding the above referenced project, (copy enclosed) . The applicant proposes to discharge both roof storm water and boat wash down waste water into the boat basin. The Planning Board does not see a problem with the roof storm water being discharged directly through leaching basins into tidal waters because this water would not came into contact with contaminants or pollutants in the parking area. But the Board does not want boat wash down waste water being discharged directly into tidal waters. The Board would like the Trustees ' position with regard to both the roof water and the wash down water being discharged into tidal waters. The Board would appreciate your Board' s official comments regarding this project. We have in our possession what appears to be informal handwritten comments that were dictated by Mr. Bredemeyer. Do the Trustees have Jurisdiction over the discharge area, if so, does the applicant require a permit? Enclosed for your information is the Town Engineer' s report dated December 14, 1989. °�a�/ ''���� 0 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Q ,� P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 1 1971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Planning Board DATE: December 18, 1989 RE: Port of Egypt SCTM #1000-56-6-6. 1 The following is in response to your request of December 7, 1989 for comments on Application number 3770 Port of Egypt. The Planning Board has requested the Town Engineer to review the drainage calculations in light of test hole data recently submitted by the applicant. The Planning Board requests the hearing be kept open until the Board can review the recently received engineering report. Town Hall. 53095 Main Road w P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5 16)7 65-19 38 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Frank Kujawski, JR. President Town Trustees FROM: Bennett Orlowski Jr. Chairman DATE: December 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10. 1,11 & 13 . 2 1000-56-6-3 . 2 ,3 . 3 , 4 & 6. 1 Reference is made to your October 26, 1989 informal comments regarding the above referenced project, (copy enclosed) . The applicant proposes to discharge both roof storm water and boat wash down waste water into the boat basin. The Planning Board does not see a problem with the roof storm water being discharged directly through leaching basins into tidal waters because this water would not came into contact with contaminants or pollutants in the parking area. But the Board does not want boat wash down waste water being discharged directly into tidal waters. The Board would like the Trustees ' position with regard to both the roof water and the wash down water being discharged into tidal waters. The Board would appreciate your Board' s official comments regarding this project. We have in our possession what appears to be informal handwritten comments that were dictated by Mr. Bredemeyer. Do the Trustees have Jurisdiction over the discharge area, if so, does the applicant require a permit? Enclosed for your information is the Town Engineer' s report dated December 14, 1989. _ moi' Zm - �� SIDNEY B. BOWNE & AN`� • Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. ��oo ��oo (1922-1959) Tnond it2 of_g eem, Roland Anders Chester C. Kelsey,P.E.,L.S. O Francis J.Lynch Robert A.Stanton, P.E. 45 Manor Road .�..�..,,,�: Phillip Schlotzhaul M Robert W. Brown, L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Joseph F. Stegmar Q U 1.1 1 William T.Styne Zabdiel A. Blackman,P.E., L.S. 51724 6 -0611 :' Richard B.Weber Frank J.Ametomaso,P.E. ( D George A.Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almont,P.E. GiJ George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. J ) Frank Capobianco,C.E. i Paul F.Stevens, P.E. Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. PLNNDIIi2G�'.'+'• Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S. December 14, 1989 Mr,. Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD X " (j Planning Board 53095 Main Road ���'��° — r Southold, N.Y . 11971 Re: Port of E9 Pt8Site Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. 88772 Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal water Since roof runoff is relatively free of mend that the overflow system be allowed as / i ndicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us - know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:cIq A. BARTON CASS, P.E. cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM Y4 SIDN Y B. BOWNE & 'NON Sidney B.Bowne,P.E..L.S. WCJI- ia�&P-We-A- Roland Antlers - (1922-1959) "" ""'�' Francis J.Lynch Chester C. Kelsey,P.E_ L.S. 45 Manor Road: Phillip Schlotzhaw Robert A.Stanton, P.E. ) , Joseph F. Stegmar Robert W.Brown,L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787rg,.' Zabtliel A. Blackman,P.E.,LS. _ ,I William T.Stype (516) 724-0611Richard B.Weber Frank J.Antetomasp, P.E.George A.Style, P.E.Jerry D.Almon) P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. �__�Frenk Capobianco,C.E. ;;jPaul F.Stevens, P.E.Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. %:) . -- December 14, 1989 Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. Mr. . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11971 Re: Port of Egypt Site Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. P416) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal waters. Since roof runoff is relatively free of contaminants we would recommend that the overflow system be allowed as indicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:cIq A. BARTON LASS, P.E. cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA• • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM 1 *SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SO 10 Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. T/JORdGAIT,999-9~% Rolantl Antlers (1922-1959) "��"'�"� Francis J.Lynch Chester C. Kelsey,P.E., L.S. 45 Man OrRoad ^";:'� Phillip Schlotzhauer Robert A. Stanton, P.E. Joseph F. Stegman Robert W. Brown,L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Q d ?`;1?,i William T. Styne Zabdiel A. Blackman, P.E., L.S. (616) 724061 1 D Richard B. Weber Frank J.Antelomaso,P.E. i J r George A.Style, P.E. ;�'�(j Jerry D.Almont,P.E. ✓ George L.Fagan,Jr.,PR D.,P.E. —� Frank Capobianco. C.E. n{Iit,:.ed Paul F. Stevens. P.E. pL�„yPllitG iv7T' � __....-- Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. -- December 14, 1989 Thomas R. Pynchon, L.S. Mr. , Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y . 11971 Re: Port of Egy82pptSite Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. 8877 ) Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal waters. Since roof runoff is relatively free of contaminants we would recommend that the overflow system be allowed as indicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ABC:cIg A. BARTON CASS, P.E. cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employ,M/FM DEC - i - br. THU 403 0 40 �Ipr I RL I FJG CotATEP P . 01 PECONIC ASSOCIATES. INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Rootley Alley P.O.Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (S 16)477-0030 Fax (S 16)477-0198 December 7 , 1989 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10 . 1 , 11 , & 13. 2 1000-66-6-3 .2 , 3 . 3 ,4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Reference your letter of November 29 , 1989 (received December 7 , 1989) requesting a check for Two Hundred Dollars ($200. 00 ) to review the drainage for subject project. Enclosed is the Two Hundred Dollars ( $200 .00 ) , and becauso of the time delay your expeditious action to complete the review would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely , PECO�NIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Merlon E . Wg gin , Ph . D. ,M. E. President cc : Mr. William Lieblein MEW/ iw DEC — 7 — yags'TF* 13 : 4 •ST2P.. L- 1HG r— PUTEP P 01 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,Now York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax (516)477-0198 December 7 , 1989 — Mr. Bennett Orlowski , Jr . Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L. 1 . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10 . 1 , 11 , & 13. 2 1000-56-6-3 . 2 , 3 .3 ,4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Reference your letter of November 29 , 1989 (received December 7 , 1989) requesting a check for Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00 ) to review the drainage for subject project. Enclosed is the Two Hundred Dollars ( $200.00 ) , and becaus2 of the time delay your expeditious action to complete the review would be greatly appreciated . Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. _. . 21674 PORT OF EGYPT MARINE, INC. SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 : q W791/214 ° 19 PAY TO THE �/,/1 6 v ORDER OF r i i L Y1l�l'1tC, $ i I nn n i DOLLARS N0r-101-1F'OFtC31< I< &Nk Southold,NY 11971 { I� y 11'0216741' 1:02 &4079121: 111033 oil 021357 r. r i DEC — 7 — :3 '�� TH• 1 3 7 48 S T I PL I f-JG C FIJTEP. P 0 1 PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Rootley Alley P,O, Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477.0030 Fax (516)477-0198 December 7 , 1989 — Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr. Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P . 0. Box 1179 Southold , L. I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4- 10 . 1 , 11 , & 13. 2 1000-56-6-3 . 2 , 3 .3 ,4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Reference your letter of November 29 , 1989 (received December 7 , 1989 ) requesting a check for Two Hundred Dollars ($200. 00 ) to review the drainage for subject project . Enclosed is the Two Hundred Dollars ( $200. 00 ) , and becaus2 of the time delay your expeditious action to complete the review would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. 21674 oW- PORT OF EGYPT MARINE, INC. 1 SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 50-7911214 -- —Ir— 19 89 — — �- PAY ' - ORDER OF $ i I DOLLARS N0rFt1'11I-1 FOPW MANK Southold.NY 11971 Ila 02L674I'm 402L4079L21: 11'03311102857 6iP .L._„�.,_-r= 'tea=- •r-�-��- ,-±^.-«xwi.®'mow- ��c�UEFOtgr� C rr :- Town Hall. 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765.1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 29, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10.1, 11, &13 .2 1000-56-6-3 . 2, , 3 .3, 4 &6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The cost to the Town of reviewing the above referenced site plan has exceeded the one hundred dollar application fee that was paid in January of 1989. The site plan was submitted to the town engineering consultant for drainage review. Enclosed please find the consultant' s estimate of what it will cost to review the drainage plans. The Planning Board will not authorize the review until it receives a check in the amount of $200 to cover the cost of the current review. The check should be made out to the Town of Southold. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ZV y truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman rgk 31Dt0-Y a. BOWNE ,WN yansy p powm,P.4.L.S . �9 m rn•.ra i,ne'aa�.- - (1872-t74G( A0981 COMI C'+eeur C Kilt y, P E., L S, a� Manor Road 't ";; •Ir I . innpu T%jACK' . .- Alen]nars W.MslCtl, P E. „�.�.:-'-- i Fmnp Saniarn..•r Aoaert A. Vinton. P.E. - Smlt loWn, N.Y. 1 1787 !,`•••,� Jos.on A S•scman__ Rooerl W. S(C*M.L.S. c� n �+ r ,� Aaw i Sa.•na Za6ala A. piAallmAn. P.C., L.S. (516) 724.0&1 1 � O IC Wnn•m T SbM 1 A.<nara a Wseer Oeorpe A.Sryu,PE. Jerry o.Almonl.P.E. George L.Pagan,Jr.,Ph D.,PE SOUTHOLD lov"m Frank cApommce.c E. PLANNING BOARD Thomas R. Pynonon,L.S. SBB FAX NO. ( 516 ) 724-0315 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE : 1yy', .J 9S�T TO: �PnCt /'yJ��y sJ�i• r fir' FROM: RE : 1.17L 07G NU. OF PAGES ( INCLJO ING THIS SHEET) : COMMENTS : IF YOU JO SOT :- •;Lar.,+ ' L TP E PAGES AS INDICATED ABOVE, PLEASE CALL 0S ? ",16-724-0611 AS SOON AS POSSIBLE . .t MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN a NEW YORK CITY • CLRAAWATER ♦n Eavn Cppenun,M c,nei•Yr u6m rloV 2 01939 J SDUTHDID ifi;PN PLANMINGt30A8D /lovGrnfaPr 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning .Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: �rr`r � Pf Si>`e Ra"', SCTI$ S.3. File No. d%jd� Dear Mr. Orlowski, It is esti:latel 'iia- the cost of _ ... tip exZ�a_� -,=__ r latter ofNays.nc� r __ :: ;nou' d -lot exceeceed $ � -- No wor, in excess of that ;:,� .._ � _ d,r�ak� µ• n by this office unless so authorized `; :.. _ rit_.ng. Phase notify this ___, : . _ .. _- t'c�u wish us to undertake the review. -V y -uly urs, w, v Robert v. Brown Scu::_old Town F csimi.ta iJ PT "I ?b TOS► N OF SOUTH&D Purchase Order # l 9 $ Tax Exempt # A163554 Date Account # �� Deliver and send billing to: Vendor DepartmentPL1q1>Wi)y;5j�d,gR7� 51D/YE�/7� 13ow/YE d- Sar/ Address So yT11o4, 7-o&111 h(19LL L I I `�S 7 u///-//lu///-// S 0 (1 o t�i L�!� 1/97/1 `1711 //787 �1 VENDOR **Return this copy and Town of Southold voucher itemized and signed for payment** ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 12��l�� rEsTfJ�LE �9rr� �j� a00 .00 oo • o �Ori�YEc T!o�/ Gv/Ttf D�j�/Ni9isE 13o.9T sTo P.gGE S}fE�7 THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURES OF THE DEPT. HEAD AND THE SUPERVISOR I, CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT FUNDS AVAILABLE IN/TiqAPPROPRIAT N WARG x Dept. Head I, CERTIFY THIS TO BE A JUST ANDE RCHASEORpER P vi Original Copy 0 SIDN Y B. BOWNE & IN Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. (1922.1959) Ui pia Viyrpp�y, Roland Anders n Chester C. Kelsey, P.E., L.S. Francis J. Lynch 45 MflnOf Road Phillip Schlotzhauer Robert WA.Stanton, P.E. (IJP (2 'I Joseph F. Ste man Robert W. Brown,L.S. Smithtown, N.Y. 1 1787 0 U �f, l t William T.Styne Zabtliel A. Blackman, P.E., L.S. 516 724-0611 l Richard B.Weber Frank J.Antetomaso, P.E. ( p " �; yyy�� i George A. Style, P.E. 8 100 ,J Jerry D. Almont,P.E. ` George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. ...1 ' Frank Capobianco,C.E. Paul F.Stevens, P.E. SOOT"' Ry Roger L. Cocchi, P.E. PLANNING 6P Thomas R. Pynchon, L.SDecember 14, 1989. Mr, Bennett Orlowski , Jr. , Chairman TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y . 11971 Re: Port of EppptSite Plan, Arshamomoque, Town of Southold, N.Y. (SBB No. 8877 82 Dear Mr. Orlowski : We are attaching a copy of Planning Board comments which were originally forwarded to us in the Spring of 1989. We have highlighted in "red" the comments which have not been adequately addressed by the latest site plan. Even though we understand that the NYSDEC has issued a permit for the proposed project, the Town Code would have to be waived to allow discharge of roof runoff into tidal waters. Since roof runoff is relatively free of contaminants we would recommend that the overflow system be allowed as indicated on the plan. The test hole data shows a high ground water elevation and less than perfect soil for percolation. Therefore, the system would not have adequate capacity without the overflow pipes. It is also noted that a French Drain installation is proposed to dispose of parking area runoff. The attached indicates that the Planning Board (as well as our office) had requested a leaching basin installation. A leaching basin system should be required since a French Drain system is of doubtful value as these systems readily clog with silt and debris. No drainage system is indicated in the crushed stone area surrounding the existing office and shop. Since this area is at such a low elevation it would necessitate installation of ten (10' ) feet diameter leaching basins with an effective depth of approximately eight (8' ) feet. The exact distance from the water table to the top of the proposed basin should be established in the field, in order to determine the number of basins required. If there are any questions concerning this site plan, please let us know. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B. BOWNE & SON CONSULTING ENGINEERS A. BARTON ABC:clg cc: R. Jacobs R. Dean MINEOLA a SMITHTOWN a NEW YORK CITY a CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/FM Below are items that the Planning Board wishes be addressed: he storm drainage leaching pc•c: cyst_m r_c_ld be set up as an ' roverflow system. Additional leaching Pools should to up ..,cre pollutants between the separation ;:and the tidal check valve at the boat basin. Additional leaching pools should be installed for the site drainage for the gravel area. +' t PORT OF EGYPT A REQUEST SHOULD BE MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING: The drainage plans, specifically in relation to parking, and proposed building, must be revised so as to be consistent with the up-dated site plan received in this office on April 19, 1989 . 2. All maps must be signed and sealed by the licensed New York State professional responsible for preparing the plans. Site grades, grading, and drainage for the parking areas must be shown. All areas shown as available for parking must actually be available for parking. A landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Board. Existing landscaping in the Westerly front yard should be indicated as such. April 19th plan shows it as parking. l/ 5 . The location of all dumpsters and above ground fuel storage tanks must be shown on the site plan. NOTE THAT - Plans have been sent to the Town Engineer for review. C,,-N-OTION for a Negative Declaration. ( read reasons for Neg. Dec. ) NyFG. DEC:'' REASONS SUPPORTING Tuns DETF.RMTNATTQN_ (These reasons are to be added to the usual list where appropriate) he applicant is to provide a positive on-site system to collect roof runoff and site storm drainage. An 'oil separater for the boat repair and washdown area is provided, thus there will be no direct discharge into the bay. A porous surface of crushed stone is to be used' to absorb minor ✓spills, and reduce direct run off into the bay. The Planning Board has required that a landscape plan be ;; mw submitted for review; with particular emphasis on the road. tt frontage. *. �.. .. _ , . .. ,, 1 .¢w. .: `1� _.,, „ au rx�, r D � � .. ,nr .. � Y � f 0. p� .. < H H]� __ h, J..y.L.�y �r. 1 V 2 •! � , it>:`.�R ue�f� di_. l.[ i... yd., "i F.. _ �, `_.. . .f �r' ♦ I .... , . ll _ .. .. ...� 1.�1, .._. _p,.j ..... ._......� ].. y .. ......�.. .... .°.r '"7 r r..._ y =�.r 'i r :r �.. .. .. ,.._ .,_ _....=aa._.........__._. i �, arY J.A: �, - F ' # 1' ^:� 'n.. . . k �� �' I, Y.. y�y ,�['" ,� s t r .. ^P..V ... .... Mn M � owN _... w: «I2of D 1989 ! szon :011 Town u1sposm, WA P .O. Rox 1179 New ,Y q Y f r{� h i r 0 z clxcaed .. . . he in ._. X, . 1, ly =fWfv; 6 Robext W . Brown i 0 D r' Town Hall. 53095 Main Road p' 1I! P.O. Box 1179 0 Southold, New York 11971 ®1 � TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September- 1989 -ter.____ -_ , Robert W. Brown Sidney B. Bowne & Son 45 Manor Road Smithtown, New York 11787 Dear Mr. Brown The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers the following applications to your office for �r�eview. Application Name: r'n /-� / OF Gy T Tax Map No. : 000- — o. /3•.Z — oo - - 3•� 3.3 6. Bowne File No. : .51319 o 02, Hamlet Location: /q SHAr►9ah9A©N — So AVTPf0L Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Date Final Subdivision Map (Dated / / 8.9)_ Road Profiles (Dated / / 89) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated / / 89) Other (Dated / / 89) Sketch Site Plan (Dated / / 89) Preliminary Site Plan (Dated' / / 89) Grading and Drainage Plans (Dated a� 89) Other (Dated ' / / 89) Please develop an estimate of what it will cost to unde,nake. the fo lowing revie of the e 1 ed p n (s) : u ,• Enter the cost estimate on the enclosed reply sheet, then send its facsimile to this office. If the Planning Board wishes you to proceed with the review, it will send a facsimile of a purchase order authorizing the work to be done. The actual purchase order will be sent through the mail. If there are any questions, please contact Planning Staff. Truly Your V Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Cc: John Cushman, Accounting Department 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr. , Chairman Southold Town Planning Board P.O.Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: SCTM No. S.B. File No. Dear Mr. Orlowski, Jr. , It is estimated that the cost of reviewing the above-noted application as per your letter of September 1989 should not exceed $ No work in excess of that amount will be undertaken by this office unless so authorized by the Planning Board in writing. Please notify this office in writing if you wish us to undertake the review. Very Truly Yours, Robert W. Brown Southold Town Planning Board Facsimile Number: 765-1823 Z4 Vdlfitt'r 5 3 r_ . a .. 0 • 0 • PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 672 Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 November 9 , 1989 MV Mr. Robert Kassner Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 Re : Port of Egypt Enterprises Boat Storage Building Southold , New York Dear Bob : In accordance with your request of September 13 , 1989 , enclosed are site test hole borings performed by Soil Mechanics Drilling Corporation . Please note the drainage characteristics of the sub-surface material , especially in the area of the proposed draining structure . For your information , the Z . B .A. hearing was completed as of November 8 , 1989. Sincerely , PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC . Merlon E. Wiggin , Ph . D. , M. E. President Enclosures : 6 Copies of Soil Boring Report cc : Mr. William Lieblein MEW/iw Ln Town Hall. 53095 Main Road O�`_� e. P.O. Box 1 179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 13, 1989 Merlon Wiggin Peconic Associates, Inc. Greenport, NY 11944 RE: Proposed Boat Storage 1000-56-4-10.1,11 & 13.2 1000-3-.2,3.3,4 & 6.1 Dear Mr. Wiggin: The Planning Board has reviewed the revised storm drainage plan (dated May 5, 1989) that you submitted with your letter of August 17, 1989. This letter is to follow up a call made to your office on September 6, 1989, whereby the following message was left on the answering machine. In order for the Board to continue its review, test hole data is required. This was previously mentioned during our recent meeting on July 21, 1989. The Town's Engineering Consultant has asked for this information so that the drainage plans can be reviewed. Upon receipt of the requested test hole data, the Board and the Engineering Consultant will be able to proceed with the review of the drainage system. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman cc: William Lieblein Gerard Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals rgk 4 SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS SOIL MECHANICS o m L MGA 99(020% Doa 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, L. I., NEW YORK 11783 • (516) 221-2333 i COMPACT& RELATED TO SPOON BLO PER nOT SAND SILT BI CLAY FHAMMER IS OR LESS SOFT 10 OR LESS M 16 TO 39 MEDIUM I I TO 29 40 OR MORE HARD 30 OR MORE " STANDARD PENETRATION TEST(2"SPOON,1401bHAMMER,30"FALL ) GN=17BLDWS SPOON BLOW COUNT IS GENERALLY SHOWN IN 6"INCREMENTS FOR 2'DRIVE R FOOT TO OBTAIN BLOWS PER FOOT(N)USE THE 2ND & 3RD 6"INCREMENT ROTARY CASING EXTRA HEAVY CASING SAMPLE SPOON HES 2.0 EIGHT, POUNDS 140 LL, INCHES 30 SING BLOWS PER I FOOT DRIVE UD - UNDISTURBED SOIL SAMPLE SS - SPOON BLOWS PER 6 INCH DRIVE NO - SAMPLE NUMBER P - PUSHED BY WEIGHT OF HAMMER FEET - DEPTH FROM GND.SUR.NOTED ATEACH S' THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED WITH THE SPECIFIC UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SOLE LIABILITY OF SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.,ITS ENGINEERS AND EMPLAYEES,FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNTOF THE FEE PAID FOR THIS REPORT.THE USE OF THIS REPORT WILL CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE BYTHE CLIENTOF THIS DISCLAIMER.THE FEE CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT IS PREDICATED UPON THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY WHICH IS THE ESSENCE OF THIS AGREEMENT.IF THESE TERMS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE,CLIENT MUST NOTIFY SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.IN WRITING BY CERTIFIED MAIL,RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED,WITHIN FIVE(S)DAYS.SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP.,ITSENGINEERS AND EMPLOYEES DONOTACCEPT ANY LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY FOR PERSONS OTHER THAN THE CLIENT FOR WHOM THIS WORK WAS DIRECTLY PREPARED AND ANY SUCH PERSON,FIRM OR CORPORATION RELIES ON THIS REPORT AT HIS OWN RISK. NOTES Soil descriptions are by visual examination of soil samples recovered during drilling operations. Soil descriptions are in accord with the Unified Soil Classification system. Ground water was measured inside the drill casing at the completion of each borehole. SOIL MECHANICS DRILLING CORP. subsoil investigations 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD, NEW YORK 1178 • 316 441 - 2373 4oD 4 D SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION SOUTHOLD, N. Y . VERTICAL BORING SCALE: DRAWING DATE. DRAWING NUMBER DATES OF BORINGS: REVISED, 89S6863 9-28-89 SHEET OF adab, Ah UNIFTD SOIL CLASSIFIC ION SOIL GROUPS TYPICAL NAMES AND SOIL SYMBOLS ('jW WELL GRADED GRAVEIS,GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES,IITTLE OR NO FINES e,�P G P POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES LITTLE OR �. �' o: NO FINES „0. G M '° SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL MIXTURE o s ;o AX G C CLAYEY GRAVELS , GRAVEL -SAND-CLAY MIXTURE o 0 0 SW WELL GRADED SANDS,GRAVELLY SANDS,LITTLE OR NO FINES o 0 0 SP POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS,LITTLE OR NO FINES • • • • S M SILTY SANDS, SAND-SILT MIXTURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S C CLAYEY SANDS,SAND-CLAY MIXTURES 0 0 a. o M L INORGANIC SILTS,VERY FINE SANDS,CLAYEY SILTS,SLIGHT PLASTICITY C L INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTIC ITY,GRAVELLY CLAYS SANDY CLAYS,SILTY CLAYS O L ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY I I I M H INORGANIC SILTS,MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS,ELASTIC SILTS C H INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAYS 0 H ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY,ORGANIC SILTS / Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURES,N.Y.C. BLDG.CODE C26 -1103 CLASS OF ALLOWABLE MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BEARING TONS/S0.FT. I - 65 HARD SOUND ROCK 60 2 - 65 MEDIUM HARD ROCK 40 3 - 65 INTERMEDIATE ROCK 20 4 - 65 SOFT ROCK 6 5 - 65 HARDPAN 6- 12 6 - 65 GRAVEL AND GRAVEL SOILS(SOIL GROUPS GW,GP,GM 8GC AND 4- 10 GROUPS SW,SPBSM CONTAINING MORETHAN 10% GRAVEL) 7 - 65 SANDS(OTHER THAN FINE SANDS)(SOIL GROUPS SW,SPBSM 3- 6 BUT CONTAINING NOT MORE THAN 10% GRAVEL) B - 65 FINE SAND 2 - 4 9 - 65 CLAYS AND CLAY SOILS (SOIL GROUPS SC,CL 8 CH) HARD (5 MAX) MEDIUM (2 MAX) 10- 65 SOFT BY TEST SILTS AND SILT SOILS(SOIL GROUPS ML 8 MH) DENSE 3 MEDIUM 1.5 I I - 65 LOOSE BY TEST NOMINALLY UNSATISFACTORY BEARING MATERIALS _ BY TEST 0 L / • MAIN �pA STING TAURANT F.F.NCrED As sM ON SITE PLAN ASSUMED AT EL.100.00: EXISTING OFFICE 0 m 612 EXISTING I I SHED B-3 I I I 29'3 ` I Y I I o I PROPOSED BOAT STORAGE I---� BUILDING z I EXISTING 04 59'- I 6_I I SHED I ' I r CONC. BULKHEAD EXISTING RESTAURANT BORING LOCATION PLAN SOIL MECHANICS DRILUNC3 fl221. subsoil Investigations 3770 MIRRiCR ROAD - RRA►ORO, NEW TOR[ 11751 -PORT OF EGYPT ENTERPRISP OSED T STORAG BUIS R AC NV STIGATION SOUTHOLD NEWYO Nonrtr am: wOCT R 9 $ SOIL MWHAOICS F2)DU 9W GCUF� SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L. I., NEW YORK 11783 08 LOCATION SOUTBOLD GROUND WATER OBSERVATION DATE TIME DEPTH ATE: BORING RILLER; SPECTOR: NGINEER SURFACE YPE RIG: ELEVATION EPTH SAMPLE BLOWS PERE CASING E LOW NUMBER ON SAMPLER BLOWS DESCRIPTION SYMBOL REMARKS RFACE 0-6 6-12 PER FT. O Sand, Silt, Gravel (Fill) (11-65) Brown Peat 5 9 17 16 11 (PT) (11-65) 9 9 8 121 Grey/White Sand Q in Trace Peat 10 10 (SP) (11-65) Grey/Brown Silt Trace Sand (ML) (11-65) 15 END 10' 20 25 30 35 40 SOIL hWp%H,0*IC8 DG30ddl w geuu SUBBOIL INVEBTIGATIONS 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L.L. NEW YORK 11783 OB LOCATION SQA] GROUND WATER OBSERVATION DATE TIME DEPTH ATE: 9/28/89 BORING # 2 - - RILLER; • SPECT R: NGINEER:: SURFACE rPE RIG: ELEVATION ' EPTN SAMPLE ONOW6ER WS PER6 ws DESCRIPTION srMeoL REMARKS RFACELOW NUMBER RFACE O- FT. 0 10 6 12 10 Sand , Silt, Gravel, 1 2 Brick, Roots (Fill) (11-65) S 21 1 81 7 9 10 10 END 10' IS 20 25 30 35 40 SOIL N*CHA ICS D5U0=19G& 99aGb SUBSOIL INVESTIGATIONS 3770 MERRICK ROAD • SEAFORD. L. 1., NEW YORK 11783 08 LOCATION: SOUTHOLD GROUND WATER OBSERVATION DATE TIME DEPTH ATE: 9/2a 89 BORING # 3 51211 RILLER: NSPECTOR: NGINEER: SURFACE YPE RIG ELEVATION ' EPTHSAMPLE BLOwS PERE CASING E LOw NUMBER ON SAMPLER BLOWS DESCRIPTION SYMBOL REMARKS RFACE 0-6 6-12 PERFT. O Sand , Silt, Gravel, (Fill) (11-65) 19 _in 5 Grey/Brown Silt 6 9 Trace Sand , Trace Organics 21 4 (OL) (11-65) 2 4 8 10 Grey/Brown Silt Trace Sand (ML) (10-65) 10 12 15 Brown Sand.Trace Silt Trace Gravel (SP) (8-65) 20 END 14' 25 30 35 40 71 _ G15z� le, 4,14 � 5 DINOV 3 !989 /CK PECONIC ASSOCIATES, INC. Environmental Planners & Consultants One Bootley Alley P.O. Box 67. Greenport,New York 11944 (516)477-0030 Fax(516)477-0198 January 11 , 1991 Mr . Bennett Orlowski , Jr . - Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold , L . I . New York - 11971 s_ Re : Port of Egypt Proposed Boat Storage SCTM # 1000-4- 10. 1 , 11 & 13 . 2 SCTM # 1000-56-6-3 .2 , 3 . 3 , 4 & 6 . 1 Dear Mr. Orlowski : Reference is made to your letter of Decemoe. Enclosed are six ( 6 ) copies of the Site Plan which have bee / revised showing the details of the sign and the utility poles . Also enclosed is three ( 3 ) copies of the Suffolk County Department of Health Services stamped and approved drainage plans , which are all of the copies available , which added to the one that you already have will make a total of four (4 ) . It is my understanding , in accordance with a recent telephone conversation , that this number of copies will be acceptable . After review and approval , would you please return one copy for the Owners records . Sincerely , . PECONIC ASSOCIATES , INC. 1 T i Merlon E . Wiggin , vPh . D. ,M. E . nPort President Enclosures Per Text cc : Mr . William Lieblein — ; -ii NT OF* TRANSPORTATION VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE• N.Y. 11788 .LAMES A. KUZLOSKI FRANKLIN E. WHITE REGIONAL DIRECTOR ra ;) �1.� r� "� COMMISSIONERI! June 29, 1989 Bennett Orlowski ILL: , 1 Town of Southold _ yj r Planning Board n Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: i Our Case No. 89-119 Port of Egypt Route 25, Southold Our review of the subject plans was coordinated by Mr. James Lentini of my staff. + .,., ter.. 1 Three driveways would seem to be appropriate for this site, one being the existing intersection with Old Main Road which might be relocated to the east to better service the adjacent parcel. This would have to be approved by the Town of Southold. 1Yb, & At present, land on the ssat-h side of Route 25 is being utilized for boat storage and other business. The shoulder and pavement in this area has been severely eroded. C " lig. .. ..,. The subject applicant is utilizing a portion of state property for his operation. A review of our records reveals that this property was never conveyed to another party and is presently not available for abandonment or sale. Therefore, the applicant must contact Mr. F. Persan of our Rea3 Estate Group at the above address and request a Use and Occupancy Permit. The Town of Southold has required the applicant to provide drainage information. I ; � S. ma r e uirc41a. a y � AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER I i a Oannatt Otluvnkl June 29, 1989 Page 2 wimmki � M entini at (516) 360-6020. t Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, I T. C. HOFFMAN Regional Traffic Engineer cc: Ms. Valerie Scopaz TCH:JH:JS I j j 1 'I al Port of Egypt Marine, Inc. Sept. 25, 1990 Mr . James Lentini M. Y. S. Office Building Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, N. Y. 11757 Dear Jim. The purpose of this letter is LID give You a status report on Port of Egypt ' s new beat storage building. So far we have been granted the necessary variances needed From our ZHA, and the Town Trustees have given us their blessing. The Planning Board has reviewed our final site plan and they are satisfied with it . Since it now appears that the prc.ject can rg f 5iiice our last letter tl , you on August E, 1955, we have !signed a lease with the State for the triangle of land between Armondo' s and the State Highway. (Sketch enclosed) Also since our last meeting we have closed off the westerly access to Our property as you suggested. There is now only one direct access tr_� C'Ur property cuff State Route 25. After reviewing the cost -�f moving the access to the old main read, we have decided not to pursue that . Since our construction wi de of t e highwa septa iv :, _ We to„{:: forward to seeing YOU during the week: of Oct . 1 , 1990 for an on site inspection. /Sincerely, ^ // William H. Lieblein MAIN ROAD/ROUTE 25/SOUTHOLD, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK 11971/516 765 2445/FAX 516 765 2592 . . P' ^rt of S �����W��W� Inc.~�w, �- - - ---- ~~ ~~=� o° ~`� Sept . 27, 1930 Southold Town Planning Poard Southold Town Ha] l Southold, N. Y. 1 �971 Gentlemen, work As the enclosed letter indicates, it is our intentio t with the state and come to an agreement n o best WaY to meet their requirements, on what a is the r Sincerel William H" iieblein MAIN ROAD/ROUTE 25/S[VJTHOLlLONG ISLAND, NEVVYORK R97l/5|b76S2445/FAX 5767852592 - - - _ 9♦ ,„ ' y - _� _ - _ _ qY-� - :.- 'Rr.t _ _-. . _ - __-_ _ - - _ _ - B _ - - - - - _ . _ ~ _ _. �.. x. __ i --, . ' ice- err,-^-F--- _ -.c.-1n7_ >. -".._ _mow--. � <- �_ -_-- - _--__- _ _- ___- _-- _ " _ r_ -,�=y._ _-- - ______ - - _ -_ - _ _-_"_ - -__ _-_--_- -- _ ____-___ - - _ - --- _ -_ -_- _ - __-_ _ __--__- - _-__- _ - - _ _ _- _ _ _- __--_-_- __-- __- --_- - _ _-- _ - __ -- -- __ - - -- ___-_-___ _- __ - _ - _ _- __ - _ _ _ - _ __ 3 _ __ __ ,y. _zl __- - f6-^Sl-Y-iF-_-_......_- ._ 1 _ __-�_� ,_�_�4_ _-.-- __ ._ �' -__ ___ - _- -_-e i, :. "'_ __ _ ___ -_ _ - _- _✓.�S:�iceut.",� - -_ _ _" _ __ _ _ _ _ - _ __ . _- - _ - -_ __ -- ._ __- -". _ _ -_ _ _ - _ - _ -- _ _ -_ .,- _- __ - _ - _ -. _ - _ _ - -_ - - _ _ - _ _ -- _ _ -- - _ _ _ _ -_- •- --_ -_ _ .. _ _ _ .y_e.Y �h.:9�"i.v'a: _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ! ___ __ - _ _ _ _ _�_-. : .yygc.xy`. - -L._.!t"- _. _ sry-• - I - ! :L'-r" :! a - .-._�� "v _ _ "c<..1 - _ - - r - - - - - _ - - -, - - -`- - P r- - _ - - - - - - Rc'a'F'A4 ,_ _ r _ _ iv 'ti +'�"'*- N C-. - vee.,.a�.'G' _ _ __ , : ,- .`:t`• -�G v ,e - - - - . - _ , - - - _ - - _ - - - - -... . _ _ _ i_ 4 rx,� u d..'z '.,'. -ry L.) •T�N _ ' - __ : _ .. _ - c'�f dam. '�`.4c�'_9y '"� ' - - - - F i .-^ ''fit fn3} eA� p_ __ -`Nx, _ _ �5yy 'i / ''(- �Y n� `` A. _ -.ii1` - iF. - - - , "- r - - : - _ _ _ _ ..ac t _ _-w.rF- €`�4 - " ' ry `x- , a.�. - _-: ' .._ -,,rs 4 r� = - _ ":;`- - _ _ - _ f - _ - - - - _ - - - - - _ - _ - -- - i �_� III { _ � F , � li r -i '4 ,N'J,. _ �.' " s .yz - - - x - - . - - `,v':.a- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - '� rs '- iY ,. ' - ,"' _ _ ,?--- _ - - - - ' ._ - - - _ . _ - - . '1313'T �J �'I_ I -C}1 "=rte' (-3E 3.h.yY' ' ..max. _ J :J- 1 -tY'G - ;--. _ -- . -" - - _ - - - "rte -, ti- " ;f-,z-:;,' ,. .. - -" _, ' -_: _ _ _ . -- ^ - - Wtsi' -_ . - _ - ' .e - - - - _ - �.. rz - :=s,✓ O`G'v. - €:_- '. 'r'3a' L� f^,`; -" -1�. " 's L' P - - C �' - 930 - -. _ 7 2 Ili -===^ti .�-f . '_? - : , , .;�.,., :- .: - - - - - 9bZ - - - - _ - 1 N `i'GP - b.-.``' xrl .i?CC??O�L �'f1.1+d:= �GL'S.-.:.:N'd Xil': a ': .'Y ' - =-�` ..a - - - = - I - - - - - - - IiYRtl 1YI01 - - - - _ _ _ '-s, r,- ?-ter .- . g- '- _ '- - _ - - - 0 1 ,. K3K" «3aa,�„ d _ - , - 319tl-1Id - _ _ RY 3.YN Y Y � '_ . + .F-\ /fie, - - ldl - h .-'.,_>-�`- : ,�. f-.-_- .--.:_._ ,. _ - - - -- - lY ;` _ 9E t- - (A1-Fli�d3 39d,aG1S - - _ - - _ y: '7�"`>5r-�.�e"" .' �: " ' rr -:g i -� -- - - -: - t.� _ - /'f\ / - - _ - 1d09 Aaa M3N1 f.k" 03SOdDad - - .-�"-•z +" - d ' . '--_`fr-- - _ _ - - - _ - I A/ - - _ 60L - - -. - nWu JN�1SI x_3 - _ - - = - ,1. _,� ra>hc k;i� - -z 'e" f _ -- _ - - - - - . --' ',- /- _ - _ _ - - - _ ._ - 9NIMadd 31IS-N0 03SOdOdd QNf' tt - _ - - - - _ " _ _ / 1' - tf�'fiFZ � i:,.-r'. s = - _ - _ - _ j - _ <"" "' - ._._,s-- _ - - $ I151 X'3 - - i _ , .1.4 �f �y, yam;=r c ' �_,� r ? ?,i, � I Y :1 - L �/ LbZ lYlal - ' _ _ _ _ _ j - _ _ 94 f." . -.- t f;& �L_`acs. ,.,;s �, '.x:,� -r - - : _ _ ��t t_ '- � l -I 9E _ _ 39 tla01S 1Y08 An 0350 .'"'id - - - - - - - -, Aff�Fk1S't h - -' e , .` ,<S�.x- {f - 7 „ =r` . _ ,: -_ "- . -� - i E - 1 - '- .- -- - bZ - - - - - - 533AO1dX3 tlN : atlW I - - _ _ 0� - 'k ,: t'' 5. ' Nr < _ , . 1, �',:- �,.. " �/ N a(1'd _ i`J ZtC%mak ter'- r�i. �[e � il' '�s.. - - _ -; "" s - - ' ' - - - -- , - . __ - - - - _ - 777 ."..- -----,-- - - I - - - - QC,bZ - Y�� 3 ,-,� ., - - - '�`rz. '•Kt mn +�. r' - -"- .__--- - l ; OZ .- - .3Jtlaa1S lYOB Aa0 9NIliIX3 - - - +Lv� - .-��.' .. -� _�' __ " . . .,,- _ - - - --- G. --� l : I - - ( , ice`-' - - - - - - - ---- - - zz - - - . - - - - _ - - _ - _ - :::'a -��--',=-k' ,,.n- r - -.-�, :-----' - "-'i-- " - "•` -_ - ; t - -. _ T� — _ - 4 t - r - sdFls a3tdN NI dNlaYia . - `- IY _ o90-`S -- x I t p r t r,z„ Rat • "-'. - - - _ - - _ t - - 't / ' - _ - - 1 - - - _.Y'_ -;'.* -'fir .>h, .r �'', � ,:,1- .w / ._ ` ._. ` - - - I - --�' __ - S*1N31iF3 a l ftia 3 N I)f a - _ - - - -EF$ - - r` 'F ^�,. 4 $ _ 'r �_ _ .-F - ' _� ,G �1t5 NC• _ _ i - 'lj S H5a'- gL�> L �i.a Jx 2 ?!-_ 1 :a•- , d!" . I ' . LLio `r - - SNOFldlfl3�d7'-3$d$ l(f 3 T _s - r F - - - - ' - _ ���-�-�" ( F� - - - - -� f - - - - _ Vis. , '� - - - I - , I , F ,,� , - - - _ - I' �, e- - . 1 ' - - - .,._"' . -- - - - - -i- -- - - - - - S , i - E ! - 1 , _ t_c I r - - _ _ - - - - ytl :ai �`.. us- ' - 'I - - , _ ,-k,3 ' _ __ - ` { _ _ _ _ - _ ,'L ' �g� - "I - .. _ ''i l 1. i I� ti` t - I _ G('0/ k i � s-.. , _ FC• Lt` _ I 1 'F yr. PGD -T. - I I - - _ _ - �._ � `t' roa Ir- l 1 - W r 1 - 1 - - - s L - - � - - l0 4 'i 1 J _ 7 ;dV.�01"- -13nj - - s,r 7N 1 � � 1 - v I kA I . r O r { . : , ` y-s r' _ - •:1 1 7J31'dM H�7rH 4V�-H?nno ;" - Ln -- - - - _ __-._---� .filGal -- 1_ ,. - r tF ° - �_� >' 1 '1 f :; ' ,i I _ - ^— - - :I - - - - - l k - �'` - e / — - i - r �I, �� / d 7 _� _ - .--_ - - ;. - - - i b - = _ ,` "-__��j� " /� ` " -- 1 J I ` - l; c - ( 1 f." - - , __ _fir. r -f - _ ,1 -a --- - - - - - - t -lt �' _ ' - • ' ' - - .;__''x'11 - _ - - i, r - : - " . . - i . - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ -t - _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _- 4 . i _ _ _ _ _ . � - c Y i, - �- .1, _ "� t- _ _ _ T _ I -� x _ - - 1 - - _ m< r ' _ o;/y 1 . I �" J t� _ I 4 - / "" it 5 _ I _ - - - - ti s ,., t r � I I - �` I _ 1 �j � / 11 \ - d _ r- _� p - - - -, - - 10 Y , ` -_ - - - -_ - - - - _- y r - _ - - - - Y b 1�.1 _ _ - . . - - _ ` // I I _ [FI"I J r I k f �. ! 7 -` - -- - - i'r l I '3G , - - - w - _ _ - - - - it " Z I� 1- p 1' r _ - lit -� _ _- - - /' � J /_LS- 'S`J� __- -- - `I F - - - - _ - - - - [ _ - _ l 1 ^� I� _ _ I -d `a Ij' �,C � u r I j - � , hh,�a�an9 II 1 fi _ i —_ z t - yvice j - - w - i;lr 3ho� I ` i I I ;,� _ x d35flde�3d 1 / ` _, 3, , r_ � , t �X, ' -- . 1 b'. - i 1 'n. rz. _ _ 1 c - .p - r n- - - II - - - - ; 'r I 'i I t( - I - - - - - - - t t Sk , t - - rte - n. - - / - F t - ! A _ / ' �--'l " - 1-.r 1-1 _ "I - _ _ _ __ n. 3 y G- I —_�� -- . - i w „na 1 I 1i�_ � 1 ti _ — - - I ` irr� _ -- --- -'- - - _ - --- - - --1 - _ m 1 r. y _ _ _ - _ . __ - `� _. - _ _ _ � _ -} _ - - _ r� _ _ - _-_ _ - _ ._ -_ �- - - - - : _� _ ` _ - r_ _ _ - - __ - -- - — - - --- - - - -- - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - � , 1 / k --- /�- r 1_ �) __ 5 --� _ cn _ _ _-h_ f nl _ _ - __ ' --- _ t 1 - 'I `r'�"c a ' -:`fes- .r.I a _ _ ,. ,yr .i" 1' _ _ 7 - _ _ � - _ : _ - ' s --' +- r - pr 11_ _- - l� - r:= h � le - /�,� - --- - - _ _.- - - 1 Y r ; - I - , .. _ ., r - k , - - - � t7J _ _ --.- - - jE- , _ - r _ _ - . it I _ -_ �-- � '_ ' - __- r C - r " . - : - l - - - _. ._._�` r - 6i -`�--�f ',yr-x -�1 - j 4 __,_ ": _ - _ ` � I _ - " -�� _ I _ _—- _ _ _ _3- 1 - - - - _ _` ` _ _ _ _ ,�y R� i W _ _ � F Ii- r 111 1 I n 1 ( _ � � ,1 _ __ _ _, I " I - = , 1 3--I S _ - - __ j, `i -) I - ' c - _ _ _-_- -_-__- _ __ _ _ --- _ - _ -_ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _-_ _ -_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ _ _ _ __ _ _ - __ _ _ �Q _YJ-_ __ _ __ - _ _- - _ _ __ _- __—_ _- - - _" - - - - - _- _ - - - - _ - . . - _ a ". --_ . _ ... _ _ --_ _.. -�-. - - I - -- __ - - x I i � � Z ,5Z1 ' , F - _ - _-_ _ - - _ - ' 'I -s03-&L, yId 11`+41 ')53 - - J 11 - - - � _ i ! I 3d+'J > - A T1 - - - - - - ,. I a ^ ,,, _.xr, - - _ - _ - - 'Sr1 9S'o3yI4 - I - 1� - - - _ _ _-- ---- I k - - - - - - - 'T= .'x ��''�`v`-i"r4�:", r.' _ - - - - - - _ _ - ." - - - �Q - I y _" F i I _ _ - 1`J - - - _ _ - _ .� s'- - + .z?e.� - - - - - 1 r 1 I �L:-- --7`"/ l - - - I - - - - til _ - _ f _ - _ - - _ _ - _ - - : - _ .� __ .�J - - _ _ - - - _ �Ti *,moi t' -earl' -, .� _ 6 _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - , 1 _ , "BVI - I - - - 1 _ - - - i-n ;:✓'- a` r�^ .'£, - -,rte - (r _ .A. afi.' .- -' . >. -` �:- , w E _._>" -,_.z . _ .,,_-., ,>.'. _,.-- KaC?67 X33.1 - Nt -31V75, ."-.:- :-. - " - - _ - '�-- s _ _ - 3], - r:x.. a�.- e ter- n_-.,Ia., - ._ .. "_ __. r :":. ::" -._,., :/ .,- - - " _ - - "-.__ •d, - - - _ - _ _ :r3 �--.-. - _ , - _ _ _ - - 't, - >x.v v -x'1.11 . -__: - >„w >€_ .. � , '._. ._ /�, - __ - - - Arte.. _ I -,.>"^.: -• -:�M-� a-,> _ t.�'i` ..- tia^ .,yr v -e'S__ _ .- � L=� _ _. _ - - �-'�rC - h: e 1�>•- - ";fi_.'w- , „��"g- '}- . ,a. -„ , ,n. - s .s. 3- -„ x - ,,,i' .. :;. - - - - _+.-' _ J,.k/ ' - - _ - _ - - 'rI- - - - _ _ _ r-..,T- -at� ..� t - of c�?, - - - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ wr ... z..`i :w"t4 - -.3��� ,-, . , __ >.... ., - ._,- ..- ” , ._ _ . ._-, ._ _ - _ - = fin q:f -Yr - � - - - - v f v_ =� Ir- rz-.. _� %C;. 33a rt, '3 vvly i :.-Y-. t.-_ f, __'.- . I _ "?l - £ S - _ f. . . ..a„ - s+ar �+-;._. its ...., rx.. ..;. r.. ". - . _--,_ ". _ 'S'" _ .4 - . V. - - _ - - _ .-Yc- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ r ._ l _r _ - _ I F - - _ _ �:_o-".:£} X:'� ar:'" • -t, "e..�, f .� .Ey- .,. JI - -_r- _ ,....a- _S _dC i -,:_n .: "y,-.".'. _ _ � -� '- - _ - .1 - _ u�i 'M''Fikfi3 -_"" a r- .`'✓r.-.3a".-_d r1!' if... ! >']�.- .>t -,c -_-_._ ._ _- __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ a-., �ar - s.n s a.>r r,. '>t�� §-- ,,.a v _.,_.- _ ._.,- - . > .- -'_ '- _ _ I .- f _ - _ -f'/� _ _ - - _ - _ _ ��e, z � I . .. S3 _S.ro.-. y, ,. -..�' .. .".:_ , V i1 ]].�� .">._ .•:-' ,.,-- - -.. _ _. _ .EZ' - ' - - _ r-S :%--moi:y . .. c _ _ - _.._. , _ _. '. - .-x - J --! - - _ _ _ _ "els' vt _ ., . qt's`-" '..e "._ /k --.___c a ,.',.. - - - - o -. - „ _.G -tt'..i _ _ - I - _ - _ _ - _ r .4'. . - '-"^_ ' .Pis.--"x''v _ '-`� _ _ _ -- _ - _ _ '- - - _ - _ - - - �. - _ f - - - _ _ -.- _ - _ - I . =��II _ } 4 , m - f: 1 1 S��.W 1 r � _ �. ',�£M ��§wT�i+`'l3: E` „Y ...k"' P..?:i � -in �Y -1. ��. �'' , .: I.. _ _ _ _ _ - �` - __ ` ? I _ � 1� - - - _ '-'£d. �'^� , L ' l II �+ I �- _,_ .. ,ter s-_' z r :. /, rs a. __'q - - _ ' r/ - _ t`'�r - - —� - - _ i' : ..>. �w*six„v-;>s` :^.W'.. "c ' " „ x 3;: -r, : _5 -- It - - - - - _ - _ t�1'' ",.1_ - _ - - - - _ - - . _ .f'>, ...if-: -><• ii- - F yxs- r st < . _ r .i ,ter, _ _ - _ _ - - _ _'�� _ _ - __- __ _ "; - i - - _ _ _ _ " ,i? �° `lam i _ _ _ _ - `e .K-*', - - .€tom. - s ':t: - - - - - _ \� �- - _ - - - - - - _ _ - �. '@--,_�:� w / n , r E 1 Pk / ' - C ." ' ^ ' _ - - - ``IN.tSTlrf7i —_J�- __� _" ��" - I x 1, - - - _ - _ - " _ - _ - - ° . rol,, , "r. . - .ry.*? -moi„y _ - - - ... - - - - - �R— - �,.e,�.><�_-�- .. F1 5' - 1. 1 f - - - _ - `+ 5 ._ _ y, _ y``.�r' ___ _ \,_' 'r-_ -,-'' _ _ _ - ,,�, ��JJ - _ - ��� £J,IwOy ,- _ ____ -'_._9�.. --�ftc,•-=-- -_ __-- _ ___ ___-_ _-. _ - - - :'�•.1,;.F amu. ' .a3n 'F£'„c ” h .t _ __ __ _ _ _ J_108 �_ u- . _ C - - +' - _ _ - - _ - - _ "' - i�i - ,E a a ;'' - - _ - _ _ - - _ - _ - - - - 1. rvR1 �� itrJ ---�Jtr87JnT' - - - _ E .Ex, "L 'i'a� 4 ,�yy„yfer _'C _L ".&. - _ `'I _ _ _ _ - _ AK'u Y't - _ _ ��.� _ _ _ f `�'a" P T : 5 K _ _ 1 �INI� '- tt��'"�✓., - �- ..w�., - _ - 3�"�I`� }'I.-/�d yv - - - 1 _- _ T {{ — -- - - - - - - - - - . .Kv� � - - . ! .KL,_ +�£x A'�'�.. }`..e`�, .`rs-i._a , ,1-.- 5 . �"_ s_ -.,, _. J,"= _ - - I " " - - , _ _ _ v � _ _ 1 f - - -_.ni^ 11 - -:,, �,d'-- ! - - _ 11 - __ t'3 it "l`�°ll,kd`- .� eu " 'fl, 1171' ',[i -ill . " a : it, 'li IAI� „ „ ''. � - - . . � _ '1 1 t C r 1 5 yP"VolFb 1 �' r� e. � 1 er , - r fit; s lF - � , ':y RAS EO �� ! \ AI � I u I i I I F , I � . � I/ 2'E,A- j Ill� { 6 - 1 ," � Ill f 4 ' ! ,� y � �\ ESQsiTt. RIP ',RAIP '' 11 1 '' yr 1 \ - �'(:>'!='ll £x is r. �[v`I FLOAT INCI DC�K � "txfsT rzro RA ^ IF I - r :: �� .r� ;:,')r+I r 6 . _ �, , J ,•fF. I - a . .1 - . - ��l / 1 FLOATt11 GJQCK IIT uj �, a _ X 145 - '+ yrry a 1 ya•rl . ' , , ,- ' �+ 5 IG� 1 F\,M, /'F,�'1� r a° :X 1,If, r. P > J , .. ' l .'1 r e� f7 i+ rr r 4i• r aryr -�''�,7 r- I � I I : I . T, ! F , , � i , I I . - a l I 9 _ r,, l f 1. E K1GT, $4pAtIH ,� pG .l ,. : y ,r xk wt ' rl 4h ,I. 1' Ktis7 ., _ Ca4C1 ., rf "All'.� � I F a , ' , - - �_�.�-.in” Ir ,, . �, I 6 . F ,l "F - n% IT , r ib rbr 1 s '1 N A!T—)'l y� J, `r > - '% �Y'� 1. 11r y lti it I du*2 s,�^9cY.': ,.F J -3 tti ,. ? J ra r h L i4 .. ., ..___. ,.- -_ - _ xrs`r. n F x ' der . - -- - . _ FFj COATING DOCk� - - � a t K, T If - - .- _ - _ (A Ri .� � _ T., xlsrrN4 .`=R t _- . . - .. . - iig �' �h , 1 1 IE a � Q. 120. S,Q. FT +i- C4RF4S 1Pk AtgTtNC,r$r — t , 1 1y` } ># '� u � r � I 4e A _ F.G':.NG,g7 - r RASSED, % -c am Ti.p li t.'r , r ,< i�a�5y^ ., u'� IY7 _ . _.- :. __..,. __.- - ,: I - AS', rl Er15T. SVLrcN'11U' Ex157. Rrc RA d, 'r r' __,� 1 .-, �i r, 1 . ,_e ,� �t .�;�y°q �4, 4 �1 %) t ✓ - v ,P t �"1D � ��i A2eA qyy�� �' t ' a' 1. - �:l ul �! I d I ._.__ ,` % 11 KIST I+Ot-1 ��� _ '- r - - r5 1- x_ i%tSk (� J. .� �r \ \ \,\_ - N\\ t FT I 'gip. I' ll1'11 ,�;r5 �, $iY `h9� �"", :, �:. _� X '� �a1I,� - r '} 1 ' ' 17 +` k ."` Y ,,✓,L., Y' �1 `�" p�� 1 �� 8%9$T)NC� ��a1q%1'E , SVI4fik'G ` L -„' I t ;ari �u T - IZRO,Ft ' ;0' X201r PA2K„ .iPAC,EB ,TY4 �'. , .4 £•, � „�.r- rL ,-'r_� � s la("ltr it b t ,:4k.L i 'A �;ai1 moo, I E _ -F'2''. �TPlAtE5 , (TQT&ll coHYEffT`fsp) ,,I-, lit,.t,; -r,' .4VV}} 1 J� �J� n .. - ,I - - vkw 1 ''a J ., .f- . . It . t , - /F .l 1 t r .Ye. �, ,T,,"� r , ' i !�r 4i ti� f - -a' - . 1 .os i S ., tiii c l' � , Y " .- .'' Izzi ', . :,1 - . : -' /a r 'li+� : o . .t, . , , -„ ., t.< - d % I. M SX �� l .,rq.. 1 q lF Ae r -/ e � r :#' m Irr r . . ., _ - f to _ i 1 (V k r I - ., ., .: � -� � ., r v',,,• :.n.�, ,= a xu,a.r : + ., . .. _, .q a ',i 'r ., n.v:.,� :j�. �� .r � EX,rSF: Lir;U,.KkEAT.� li 1. I ;. :-. . -. .+ '., _ , .� ,F' I , tra r . .ur. ,I . '�. R. ry . .4, ,. - ,., ,y , ¢ .,. �: , �` - . r '�i - ,.. - , - . tt F . . a,. >a. i L, J r ., �., . [ ,. �' 1 �y� ' J` ,1 ar.. .. � i � r a ” :lir �F: I_; p - 'Wr .-f'' . ,TF.+M yr r tyY Ill -.-4+u y ,i Vr ��e - 'LVA( 1 „ � n n I „ , p`t L', ,1 Si i , r IF K - . lr ;,u, $ Tl 1 - I %� - __—_ --- ” .. ,$: - ;i, ' , I _ I 1/ I 11 r c,, 11,11 y LJ, ' n 1 P r Jpb r h 1 1 nY �+y �.f .. - r I4 C,12Ar__l , . OT IC,�' yF _. I'\L✓ V\. ',Cr 4✓ j, � " .._. ter- („ it ',. r 1 ''.1, I I SEE NOT EI r�"-� �y+, '^ p•yt^ -J „� i �"`/Y+ ,, . ExfSr. I G70Ck ``. OI r vt. A i ( �,�{�tr4, .�r �'I�-•L:+EI,: 777 'I '� 4 > �' ` p",:5 III, F—T_____-j L liol - - �h .�' LlWcer,ep', SISN 11, I - °D' ts4zlvSw v LIt � I .. I I 1 _ �� : ON �PiRO T' taW= j .� � I-•- � " F� IT 11:�i LT J r i, Ir t.A t it `. I L I I - �k111„nfW*y ( , Exts TING I i W SPF I r.E T 5HoF' I 1 o) * '', x' 8' 4RA IF ANTttitc� ` �' I w , _ !11 3 ` } I P I _ u J' e N 1 - l- ,*.«. .,;! r-.:- - +.,.,`y'.i.l. 4 m^- -,?}-: Y „ r.11 j7 y S, 1 r : t� '_.1 T ,..1 4 C h j '1 ' I^ Tlil , ,; 1 'Y , t. Jnr- .. a. '1 �y {..,�,y. - r „}� i 1, 1 , „? `'L T, , 3 JF.k:„_r,.,l”kkd,a". - - h .",'T"`:, ." £M.x+Q 3' .�a ,IF t� ,It ti tl Lt I"Ilr. r4 N k G„ I Y J' .,r. .: . 1 , 4 JF ,r , .A 4 �r 4-. d J _ - +bre",*rMMixf w.l �I „ ll I'l -.56=1t E17 .�.v 61,,',� &? irt., ,.. x `r.. Kt hj i"!srf 4, _,y .r 1111 l I1, I RN f1_ b �� 1V. . F !. EN�`1 4, F fl _ u „-- r,ll I .. .a .. a I ,Q I�n'4 - - n1 9 .t ✓.. 1 - L.. "f � �Yc. % ♦� v l _ , Sr1 1 yy�Q.tD 'S , l! 1�� 4th- ,iF ..d G i ' Sr In r ! " , : ,- \�� L 1 , ASL . F � YM a'd w ` _ ..-.«-. +vY,A+-r':N' i 'r+�a'i lI IT .y,",'41 , .IJ a, ^Wi _" ." ,j; =r' N' , IF : r 1. - , 1 -;P q - IT iT s' F .h' wN , - I,Ti a 'p - r f,1. -.: _ IT ,� .t t 1 - F. -- Vdn�K h W k. ' , JY a , 74' % ITT, w ' _11C�T F a 1. t, � "t, � II . .r.�-_.—.T"_ - , Sr�1 N� 1 1 _, , P "L' , , SUFFOLK GN f Yr TAX MAP DATA �c70 ?E;l,, - 4 la I F, 13 't (f okJl ,. I000 - O55(, - 1„ _ 3. � , C�,.3 h , F (u,I sza' 11 } i m,�'t�"z V� • f fl 1: I � , y _awn -._ - �. _.�.A. %- '(• L 'f j .f tl9 J h1 ELEV. q' - cONI'buRS REFER. TO MEPN SEP: LEVG.Ll ll �' , . . � 11.:. ' 1 c; �`ti'd! y,�`+�V� �TF �I, rile ' ''` v t p;' q'. FIT 1 T ' t .n _ FIRM - ZOIIE A4' �Et. E�} �; . r Ir' Rlpr�� l 1 ! lr I'll ,� , ( Y t"h"L �1 i1•d V( F 1 N1, 1 ,i, , ' _.>.t f t` �3 t', q' ° A 1.:17 d^W,a 'h 1 yl '.I „ , ;�.y, - .t . . , , _ 'Y re � 4 "^� k 4 ,k11f va�, „'lf I, tr LkN „ r^+n�i pp r` -I :. :tl-f}.- _ �y,+�.� 5 - .,,.,� r t; 1.n r%` "'Y ,4� �I Jr p t. ,�)!_AI�1�� , '� lQ3 ( �In T r. 01/'� �q Cl lrr 10'f.b+:, o , , :,. - „ _....: ... . _...J 1..,' -W"" I TH ,! +L9„4.31d1dIlp"Yb ,.lr,+' t t�4 V�Y:� �•C.4y, � . li 'fq4. - �x I' rr++�y I rl CW i i oe, tM_ i .4 v ., �1, +rr..,, zQNED MAR NE BU�t� �� [� q 11 _I7� , V1?TM Ok .?t't1 L1�FIJ _ ,I r ry,� .1 tF.'.t7N`�'}l'rii, o r - e} .,,V. i 1 .� _�, - p4 C � A Si 1 T E f FITfir, 0 M., V .. .Ir•'. � 1 1 t , I % ' - C �� y.,. &i - r -i: CJ� ,1 ,P,: ,.ICUi t„CY.Im .n f •'•r;, .', , 1";,;a4 ' ^ SEC 1 , S 4 r' 'k# �' I' x, 4 ITT, . . ., Dnk p7p ' Adley P.O. 'Is 67 Or9ei+porl, N w::` `4. ,� f 11 1. Y t, r a}. I _ a ,. . p1' py'k'Z+O'U.LO,. a1. ,ry '# � � ,FA I . ' 1 ,ry.:l: t [ wt r , 'P .7 5: ,4M1. . 4 i 1'.,i y1^nA �1.. 1,. Ili � _ ', 1 4' 1:1 2 _ - - / f,� 1'.L.,r" 1 r -rll � j �;,`� 'YA,`a,'9 MV'( "R-, .1 s,,;;. TO Ili _ --. . "i .,. 1 .. rEfflswum mwi > - i ,.., ,. 'r i, n' , , .- y.Yq. '._i? ,.- I� : . . . , _ y-1 , ry:,, Y YI„ ..y - �I Jr ,,, - . ... gi,', .r� LN'. -., .,. .._' ., ..;p{-, i �sL .z... ..�n_>_ d. - .: ..,��`L ... , .r>w-:....:.._ � l,r-.w�.;�_. '`1' _,._1....;.a_...W, ..�.,,.y r7,e.. -:,z,.', i ;,. .". .," - .,. ,,. :_.:,.,_a' - - - - ---'-- `__ __ _. .._.�_.�—_.._."....cum..:.. _ �. - _— __ _._ ` , I sD121;_lU(�7 00 I I 0'001 N ILII Cl qP • I I I � II +`� ll � f Pi + I r I 1 - I N t I I * JI Tj r -� ial�lall � Ij t ' i 1 � � I 1 k -1 X49 YN;� •M1 I q!ao01 o 0 d erdd'd� t y ISI In ry (pp i I`� N G a 0 i I � b 4 C? yy�qq n , Cal _Dl - -- - - - - - -- - -- ----- - - - - - - -- -- - - -- t - - - - - -- -- -- -- --_------ - - _ - .z� r _, . y ,t. _ -- -.._._-__�----- - _ - - - -. .. / - L_,r.E..I+F+ 4 -FdOLS T» _ -'-. _ _ ,`, ": �2 ,�) SEPTI- '-�Ys+'CE-..ID'L 'tl-P-� �ol✓-- -OKW 7�>9= -- _ N __-- - - - - wit .., gid-. r... ':.[ -s..2'.eus.'"'. 'T .` G - c GC F1- IFV¢ 1 ,,,-"P11 y,.A,-LsOi-f- ,^l j" {�t-�J - ,7�F-- ; _ ] �- 4 llf�tt'� 4 -i - � ��. I•�` .. .4'-FF�� 3t1-FPuLY_ c�cU.1TY M�:ILYH'- 7�PT. -- - - - - - jl "'ff4 s>_= , -- -2 l� //� A i I� A �� nam 1 >�•TT� , ,o.�,;r - ,� �O - - _ --T/S�K.-- - F¢�Ts.� 9�tY-,vim= - - - _ - - --- - _ A.P]d'PovAi =Y�YSTi�.al- 1rI S`t'/� LL6p ,/Y/A�l.1O�: 'P Y "SSC -,Aj- ,F C YsciTtl Y1� - +a.I- - - "' -atl ,=7'f`W[i7•r'YRX-/n,PP N= -10 S4-rb-4-10.1 3_.1"L. Lri-H f? 6li'>LV�Y,O.Q:: - - _ _ _Sa '.\ 73�-J�'-� - 4. �P-z F✓'R- 9 F-F--i P71 a'F1_- - -- -'- - f.tf -3 Tit:' T -HE4v - ,V7 :-"tau _ - - . gg,, EX16TI134 N Xie Ia-i,4 GE-v-Ar I� 4, 14 �- - -- _- - - - <ttc ," /A � \ /``' `- �f C / O 'L- _ /n Uh41G rrr L- �vn r_ L \ -_ _ - - , - _ - - re's' N \ /i� - - - ,c -`sF_.t-,,/\c.-c-- -- \ trat$',!i-M"'. ,- -iAJMl rr� 5,1 I. -=f-+ -� r- . 11 \\ ; \ ' �E� r .Q, ?i l s, --` '\ / /' Fl -t- --s7_.a- _, ` - _ _ ili.`r _ ..w wY - _ _-_. _ / _ , 11 �rJQ> ��P � '_ tx✓` J`H��.5', F. / �� \ // . ` \ "\ l. \ 4I�a,.���FEL Ta.a ,! ,,.� �LJ-- --a \ ' ` �_ - � -- - - a _' _ _ _ _ - `S`� \\ t s\ \ \ �/ i ` \I\ !� (I t, I o n _ _T /o \�Y� l -•may - - - - _ o M - r`. ' ".a. _ - \ r" \ i'\ / 4, JJ, _ \ \ \ \. 5.tt 1.K'c a r..a '`rt\�X� .F." �� \� - ' - - _ - ,.- :, ..:.-,. ' ''• a.. ,,. - _ �I 9 ` N w� l ra t>aF'4 / \ .tee z clkty_ r- , � - _ fD wry G�--fC_D . _ i G \ .\ -7-6411- > / - _ - x- \ \- -_< - _'_''_ �-^''s. - 3^- _ 4 _ '- ,_ , 31T �dGr > N�J//h,(�ti,Wj- - \` \ \ -gclmTfN4: ./- / : - - - -" . �' �` t �. � `�_ - - - _-`- - . .a - _ _ _=Y tJ \ - \ '', , hWP-,� r(.� G .[]l� �1� \ \ \\ \B \ .rz-z7L $ -/e - - --..,ir,;a-1 ,.�.. - - \\ 11 . + _ ..�- _�'* `..' - - -r = - �- � { - - �� \ ` s4 tic rP \ \\ R `\ / r+ 5` v ` \ryI \ fid° \'� ` - .° _ 7 _ _ _ ` 11 !- ( - - -. --z,-_ _ - z-1-.- >..-�- M1 . -rr .aE�-- .. . ori \ I fr - a - % 'l, �iJ ,�.\!\�� '; 1.r' \ \. \ C, \' \ it \ o - s - _ - - - "��' ._ _'!� - \ Vr_ 1✓ \ \ / \ ` 7 _- -''$ df8`lt+x.it _GT`.t l; _ I - . i �`_. - =.•n - 1 ,t J?,\'- _0 -F• fJ �J �j -. , Esc„ _ - fl 'a; -, - ' _ _ - ti [ ` \ pt� \\ �- x.1.1 �^\ - - _ `>._ 15 - - - . - �zr s _ 'r� _ - - - _ � tiu \ \� av ^4 \ F9 - J�T - s' Fi moi= , p'� 1 ` `o ' -Y>: sd -`4 - ." - a- _ _- Y r 114 z 11 \ O -- ✓I � /i 'CJ \` \ TBB '� r r t�T':-a - s ^?__-_-- -� \�' - - '.G O.�:r�id. _ - ._ �'•t/ -I'�• - 1'� P - � �� - - - - \\ / - ` _, , / \\ _ Lr. � s_F k - Vii '- j`lr cR` IS. - r 4ri_r..v� G[..Cvtr-►`�iva-s - _ - 9r, s.r L . `l =� = *- -- - - --- , - - _., - •ate - -- , s -_. �s!.TC- \v8-L�6 tJ�� I��(��' I I�OO 05G OG- 4; (a.l. , /! / F'+Ct5Tti3a - -_ \ t, ii` :u6'' _ •- \y/ - \j F.�:- s ==� �.a ,�1 rv_lolmw�-Irllc. - . DJ4 - 45eiG- ,{©4 t1 b�- f- - \ '\ \ \ / i G .,r4/ iia¢-�I+.r4�1. 'r . - f-„�I'll .:75.? �-k£ :: ._ - - - _ __ _ _- - ff � .L i'4t �i,JF . .1 - - ` y > - \ i \ ` j Isu'1 / `\l �`�P I \ yT_ - - .GL - - X C'T. ji✓{Eti� = � `: I I CEs ff: *muh . _ _ _ - `Z e v I� � _ _ _ 3`!-17-\t . Usk - - - / \ / F - - ,L.o _- II - /moi _ V .11 zf , _ C �i, - I 1 �,/ J� \ \ /���o� ' \x= �, _ a _ tom Z-b as __ =�vt� �� _ - [� _ I" -, ACA `-.,,� � - - - , ,� p t 1 \ - p •� 1 - \ tI 1, i _ . - - \, ."$ � F. - �` N - 1 \� T? ... } Ze .". i�_S Fly 'T W. A I wlwi + - eo..1.r - maw 3 \ `�/ , /� '" \ ` ,[ih�- - - ��`i_ � e '},� - " _ \� - / - - r -- r 'rte 1 AtiI�l'j" ( +�1Xi'�{ _ Ob�u"J -�'? f`i -.-- D' �f - _ _ x *[ : tea . �,- \ i:a<19 . �. k - - \ .� at Lr� \' � { - = Fri°L"+'�-- �nt�/✓ '" -T`i�f� f01lo�:F,,, _ - _ I lam- \\ \ _ _ _ _ _ 3 1 _ - - _ - . _ _ {.- - 6's+w. --,r'i - \\ j \I -1l -\ \ .\ - _ - _ .-_ �'{'AI Li �&Zfof) - ., t - \ 7 t9P F1' C,_ -A_6 T?�i,A�_ 1 k� \ \ ` \\ \ \� "mss1. . [ p�A tt� _ I,riO tea. } A10 /iG/�LFi <i•� \ O U \� \\ (� . Ej/ ',p -A - _ - - -`:-� _ / ss`t�cf- f+l/ ..- ��F ' 9 \ \� \\ " - d� \ v A --- �- \, -. "_ _ _ - - - \ -�--.- - _ - - - - _ - - - - -` - - - - - - - - - - _-__. _ I - \ \ \ - \\ � \ NL N f_11 - � - { T \� \ itf _ \ \ �l`� - _ t % i` /pXh' av ;-K - 'ei^ yrr` \ �°` - - - \ t10 k, • ' '= Id,.reef - I \ A \ \ '\ - - - - - 1� 1 ' -;-- ^r--""----••--� ' \� \l sI I r4z [� l . '%iH. ! P1t, six �+- "np - --,:>1FFLti-T' - O - \ \ \ - - - - - - _ - _ B.a. I.s.rsr, + - w E-'i#- 4tss \1y / - - -- - _ - � TJTOMs-O ff1f 11 -I L' r;, e a , - - . _ _ '` - - _ - - _ - ¢ - 4r T'S i ` jFA `�` 1. 1. \ - t I & A,� _;j 0 I A I Ll, Ii. I I - 11 - ,I 11--��Ir_V-- ,\ I \ I \ ' I-1 F'T-µ- - \ \ _ I . S WIG -Ah11L �?�TAl } r _4eeo� y P{o moi-der-L-E,. �1 \ \ _ __.. .._. - _ u . _ -_ 1444 m, . y - - __ '_- r I q �� 11 -- - - P;;t .'T'=r�,'� 71.1.1 ` - - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - iln / �7(I�-(`. \ \ \\\.�•/ - - - / ^t' _ -. . =4I, �I>FT - + 0-v I��� t - .G! �/O �ivA/ A�i9E-D vAL W T/�a47'- A-t/ �do'WVALOA7 \Ya�T6iL _TA �i-FIR.YE3�..L¢_ 1Lr �" 5dt_'Y ! \. l I - - r- li.k `F :- �vo2+s- - - r i x/®ilwFw _ E T / ��.,p / a /I . 1 SUfW�f�11DEPIIRTMENT OF HEALTH SENV ?//tea o���E oL //u>ioN �»rwL �v 7z/E Sw �'¢ C`x _- ' / o� r T �` FM2m,,oFORcoHSTRucTwHlRrr APPROVED BY cF,� w3 g dam', 1 „'- 4-�' �Ir1� of / , Y-��t\/j� ~ _ - �- 1^'.f r R✓1 HS Fi. p.T X10- 9s-000- 39,006-`PD .v L�iEAT /"r+5 i 3S/ASFuffc Jrl__ -_- - 1 , / , " `� "` FLOW 1 S H oas T6a ,/•vs7-s/.i-- •Pe.�„oi/v -:PLANNING BOARD _ - I H14r+ ,V�T�R- \ / X �- ! / % Al A ClN nJ>!iE [7 �K9 SS ///-t OJ. �: 1' l•.k_ Imo___ \T/ \ ,/ / / I 1 ►rPF�lNc.-/CAS .A _Stw,m/ntu�ooL. .� / y - - - y �i� ___ - - -. �.�aw-Fi+r w/ - - ��11 j//j /� }, - / wTOWN OF SOJTHOLD_ _ - - _ _ - c t - - 1 - fg uoa vsl�. ro.N.E>7 - / � j' !- 1ips�aRP+a+r a IpPll� bt [he Ca11y[faa[IM.a Tht Sa1N1ary G / - _ - - _ _ _ - Iftw - t - -� z�"fl -TYP,GA✓ - \ \ yam` cEw,.rE/� oO.�cHi TL c7 ,f.UG�.r�EE� /+4'ST O.er+ p [I _ -.- - _ -- � - � - - #-�� _yi/� 1 \ / dlswlW and walBr,uDd►haFtixs WrswiRb4dclls VR mA �71/E SAu.ra9m/` sy.s �n wns �.�sysrf/Ed iv � A$ F y � s 996. _ A9Z�fi -' _ I � r l L �j/-\ f � j. r/ 1 1 1-��i\ Y V V Y ��'�!-'•• 1 t/ / '),,\ T aF' SuNMA^aonN Sanitan Cade atb n ro[an eM?+rssed Ao D.9.v cE c.�.rfJ `Sc DNs Sinn v de�i7s A�v� .� '- - _ - -- - _ I(1.. / `-' 'rl�___J / © x + pl.n .aP.o.e. n mscaaye frml a aUUM 1w, rnerToee-s SSE c.F. cn T.�.us. - _ _ _ .. �. - _ _2s/ L. \ / / :1a1 °.+.- :NIS aP VAL EXPIRES TWO R+YEARS A _s Dec - „�� / It}` -' ' �4�,, vA/ /s -54dJecr / RjO .-4" t / sly oGy Ie"; - -Vz Sq - _ O _. _ � fl - . I IEtz 1 T-- 1 t _ - _ - S'9 =_ / .'G IE 7gTE SU.cNA[IJRE - - - ->a-1 - - _ - T- -, t / / J /p�, _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . � 113 V.EV -O 4P-'-A� , \ .-"�- _.-/ - -- - - �- _1jr _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - -_ > - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ( 5.35 /''� - _ T.¢_A-f' _ _ - +7'1RT.... -F2' �'� _ Lf _ _ - _ _ . i syZF :- e--- Int' -'�i3T 'eF -62 ' /1" �`t"�Y'��..r�n - 1. Jcse" 3 i--�J - - Q S. `'.__ - _ / ((( \ c,� PP ` . 1�^ Hp-� - ,�.hl_ - �P:pa l- - _Y,_.3etiYkf�:- -__ km-x s a saO ra rru - _ jm; .t V- sIT� LT,�-Ta 9i,"VF _- L..aT- Idl[P os Gr , 141 - -4/C is l- - I - -.� _ = 1,,rv. ':L_ A rant, m ncrrr n w nerd of Rmi, - ' - _ , . - _ _- _- j - G. F3 - \ , \ 5/x-9 --� S���z= -=_#!�Y__1IIsbC G{ - YUF-n-(E `\ \\ r ,,i drfMnmaGn>�nte _ - - _ e.t _ A4 - - - ¢,-sc 4 r.Nv - - _ V- -2 \ �I -" " \ i _P$V Y" -r"E T= '>SYe/J/ri/�171Ei P ly -- '! k+D ,y M.iZ .r= - tcd,� s 3'a,ra _ - _ _ - i r C / J _ - v 6F$ F 4 �E 4.4 - I __ ---_- � / .3 - �Pfi-d �,r4'n --,I {L �tv=im -a. +rks e��, iAs.eatc'I.f S z x res ,_ 33,q,�ry - _ - -_ J�IO v._ ., s x �a s - - - - - - - - --_ - dam-= I �.1/ 3 P�ED 5GPT t!z 5.85' - - - - / - - - - - •fA1i�4�1f�rc. _ _-- _ _ _ AL4 WI�4L-cEr1'a(L LEJ ELG�eh - , _--_ - - - _ _ _ _ , - , - _, _ T- s' Wn-'0W.@'._' -'"-h biYG•+= 35.x+-' - �`:. 'f7fd5."t^Yt Lora. �"P' _- _ sus aua/n 1'�ER/b. vle-r_ LNP-2 fisv. GNP-Z Yt+N K- / K7 TO COVENANTSi RESTRIQIONS LIRER J7 . . .. _ - - � 'z " _ ' . " - . 216-VT; ;;1*. 1 FdLn 915Y Y rix 91=+513' T9S�'T "Y✓x _ ,/� PAGE 7L - - - - _lr4:teD.S: ,Y.�_�7.>+�'� � +t u�4Y w SPEar= \ `-.� - - 'Y". T.g.L. 'T�F�.+TEreA,T.`. .? 1 39 . ,- /n/aN l ro L a -r0 _ L VE-L E.¢s 19� EL._ +5.v5 Lt 4• L:E_e4 - 3 _ _ f _ _ _ 1 " _ _ - - 1, 4 0 G I`T ''T -? �,'Y s= , 780 -{ av1 =- - '£ `l-u:z+R.wxaL aE. INOTh Lc-b-'� 6U lON -� . ,. _ _ - - - a - _ IST¢-t T - _. _ . - - - ` P-1r"es '.`_T.'..'� .F-T - �€ v .'I,aAL,'-._- _- -_-3,1�1so e�-k,�- .crr _ s3's'H- aQ,+,. �i.,s�.rxreaa�,-€Re - va rg �. Lz - n•s PF F'� T�lf-rIZIPUTI�I.1 Y 11s13L... W.t, �1� - / _ _ - - - - N -Yu2 Cs iFOL�1� /AA.-kIFdLO- - - -- \ \ /`,/ - - - _ I y , SC> - - - �\ /// £/CA\'AT[ON INSPECTION REQ[11RED tL .BC ) : 12 ..x . `.- *"7._ _ - _ -- .- V�kt- O _P, a� ,u EL. a \ / , GR SANITAR Y SYSTEM = - ?' T 7f =;.P,i-',- _ -3 '- _ ..- s ._ '�^----i'YA- - SPSGI FIriI rlora S- Irl�/. Ems, +S.a - \ \ 7,r-u.'. 1.390 4�•1-? Z" `.i 1, 15S s _ t`�: P.,gYT^ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - . ._-: - - - _ - -sAE'r� 4 - - - - :, �a.. ". nii+r{•T.�+T _� -.= 7�_ �s 41�e- Q -f53-tktX7{:ice"-.-4-[tE� \� ��., BY HEALTH DEPARTMENT -"7I ''✓FfJ•""[�3'x s=s' ect zf IN#-IL--r¢sro¢ Gut✓nv�¢rYh >1gB3 xz = 1, tG2 �R.FiT Pes/lnsa - - _ .- - - _ F 1"OivY- T'Y r= ! 1 - `t f I -1T5� i 0,Rfx� 14'1414 �{.GL Gi-F.�s-"t' / . ::'S SdVP"�a•--?; - - 1�''i ,•.v.� L "�s-F 7 } ;_ - � " ,.�`-` - .. -'4 vp -_ _ - 1" 6 L 10 }� - - /� :���� _-Y�.T� -�'cG N 4 -F'- s I-. - 40 men..\- _ _ s-v"A�I sW4-''.ta - �.�a ac. �c na. -�-+Pa - - �/ \\� \`7 i [, � w� [ L v =z�s r,_ s -17 --"ti eN 1.N �k _ �s �. T ,- _ e �q4!#?'' - \ `- 1 T �, Vc1ffl i - ---,2,-r -` rT.rv1= iz-Tom'-s .t*.Y x- - --z5'Ta z -- _ _+v_xE9 -, -Pu&!.� r "'ht+.r-,;rf-cxta. _ _ i-, j5" • .zPo .-' -t•>_- ._ - s. ' rte. �,rkFr vtr > 4,._ �_ 7a - t T1� l �� :. �`�-L`� - _ -_rZ3'9:_�ai'=F`G-P6r7YCO iZ1 "k��' *.Q FY---,:� �2S'I � _ -6� :iA.:fi3daTpk -�'r- S� - '• _� sip ,. _ y ___ _ _ -___ - . _ _ ✓ r/I r ��� I i/ LNI��_d_,,� "� :1 IR f ` `iF - - - _ 'T4, i# Z 1s-;:-{ - � _ - .- - _ _ I I ._- ,e .. ;_-.- .: \ - VF`_-`. . _ '_- _ - _ - �p _GG-TA'N[[� -P3IIJYA-ITGY?�_dS1✓--Lg3 'T€531 ; `.... _ _ __ -' _ __ _ sq ' -'i�P.°.L - -- c7�n l .Ei1'Idj`'- .'J�!�!" :3.d. '27]+ 'YF. I 5GA-4� - 7Jg L O . =-,w - \ �( 1 �` ,p. p., ..�_.- - - _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ - _ 4 I I w ✓ ,g WT� I -. r,{-'4 +, "l.#'i1 -. 1��+'f'.F1 r'� __ - - - _ _ ,1 -=1Z`Ld_l:.lS'8U 15 Ie- ,-,L2 u�_= T•,'+Ja' ''=T-1L01r is-.r'c. - GtL_l� - �- . .1` _ _ __ _ �� r, . k OA . �f Iqt _--=_ _R <rT-T'i:-r.,b-s��Fvsrt6,ru'1 aj,- .�].:_ :ik TZ!,-aFSa_v _ -, " _:G -�A=-.�,.��.,._ - - I I ✓rOG I�ICQ WW 0616-1,1/ p. l _ - 4 - _ r.,vt =au7r r as s, , S yrs-��aF,�rr Z JSCwE �N _ I F7AGtl- �rw .7F �'+i�lU H .+I- ieT't'I _ - "r _ - _ _ A Q k - 1' I - '>�. , �-' GUt"l T,,rz�AS� T�asr_ `�uQ.rA..cGYL.L ucAn�t :^, .. _�:At� z,s�CacEE' " '�cHT_ ' .ter"tr:_i'#"sF x,, - '- I t GUAi.�3S-•moi_+ =-[Yn- - ��.� 1 _ - - _ J CJS-3- =Y&2Sty .21'=< _:__ -- �/ f jE. _ - _ - - - Ya+ - _ Yat sT� �t AN[� hKa . . L - g rs7`5 s _e�1or[ t .: C +If fele- �cE�cr e . re" / r'lsF+' s ri .,F�cSf �- I ` _ Afw _ - - _ - _ _ - �r _ ' 6 xSafrrx 771- Gomez#= 7. r �1t[3I � tt : -_ T* Tz�r� _ � _Facnn-1-.I st ✓N IUFI�T�rro r� v�v - _ - - T - _ _ - --, _ - - _ _ . _ - - _ ,c�e_s+ • - _- - _ ., 2,...=.-�Lrr�zl/zc_E:- - - - 'CtliErsi�-i _ � I I - _: �` _ .s FTtT�F wsS r-Y Y.GtAC.e.iG -•f�N¢f.- +4-t/f /3a3�uia >cTJlk+6�-:GI-�T �Yk -i'Yi_. , "CiC{E-"8.>�s _ :. ,. ._-.s ` FrXGAv'n.,Y ''_._4 ,�A 4eF_.0 TBA.1' '- �_ - _. -` - V:- - - - FE ? � % � _ - _ .A*r.J. -'P cY;�v.+Ls,ii.-.-P_i.t=ti L'fJa'� '_, ,Y. - r 4A. *-i n S:QM1 tt#"i`_+,kms s'°, 1- . ' /3.-rte 'v '- 73 -_--_._ TO S• FZ _ _�5�5��c_ INK.=fdr LE_vK-t'LSM�i - - S'-�.r-E .--j I �P",L1. 1W .. -� Td I FY .w 1 M 6_43 £YT•i' [..- �? '_.- j- ,,'J,�J- vv, : I = - _ - _ _ _ _ d++'�' _ _-. - - Ir/ I/ R-P.: '- --..- _ - Rd3�t�b- 5.93 y.T. / F[t�t. V-34 _ -_.- _y ---!,- I Et`= +L 4'.'1-ktGkR 5"ED3 LK. FSF/h,IK [ x k�L'3? -:-_ _ _ _ ._ �, __ ..T 3: . .-I.6C�L L- - . IHy 6L. f. . -t$..mr _ m _ _ _ " _ _ _ - F'IF#,aty v' .aa=- lw� .-Ia-- - - �-_4sa� - -6s, - - _ - - - - _ _ y j � - _ _ - n. �L�lJ _ _ e EL.+b S_ _ sem-- _ ��r - - - iuv, �i ,- : hI T�YTfi bY51' =//L f lb �:s,- SEaEonecy *\71 _@ t . .. - - - '. _- - - . IAI I 1 I. - [TfPt f�TYL�-Tr?T�- �Y�'iTFclri -T '�YtT�.+ fi-wwl U�AGT_1T-Pr.rli; _ -- . : % - - PFG\0t'R /TFc - - - _ i p_y L--f_t4--'F'-- r- li';. sk-,kq T ' . _. IF G.._-AF&.4;"dEF.Yt!'.tL6✓"' - _. - P,q l -� �- a3 yam+ "^ �y"t - t/tcw�r ex-e - - - -Z. t$ _ _- _ I _ I - LBT3-Wp€%L, I4-CT�1`� if- =/f'f_'r"T/a Asa - IN Gs>Av:'Pi [/�F1.L:L.- _ - " VP 2C i� - _ N _ - - t T I (�- [� I _ _ - - - - _ - _ EI__I+3.GID�- _,_.�� 1 - '^^T__ I b m-H /5-4-1---�ISfi�N.f3tFA.Gf.Yyt)z �S hPE.G-1 iG/'T[ mpq;r - - ,p`� 1�1_ Oto vii, B S � _ _ _ _ I I t - T[t�-Y6J-TS?4�- _ __4 --< •- I- 1, I - /S_.t R-: + 1I F.>=(Si 'T..�.eT4,_'€Y -'1- A_LTH . T�-E2'T. 'S'1"1+Y3-VP-.32..P3'r. ---, w>r _� _ - " __ �' - - `+r t _ _ � � AF�RET'1' A STRAAtG j-� �� I -- - o - -s nrs[ics�_vu - - - -- - - - - _ - - . ,'Fa3 _ - - ___- !-riEl��i>r __ - 1.4 rLL: l'6:^.�e¢7ir 26- =Tf� - .z r-_1 ,VITN n.Ul� G"H PJ.<ry.,fi t^���' 1J�6 _ _ vt Tcs P aw.Nv r� r � eca�-= -' r v-= Main Road�O BC 4� Southold.N.K-119T1.: a .EEIa / - rx. 1 o-� �r•c9 sot� ..,_.: - - - - _ - - m .. - SirPYi-c TAta K..0 _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ __ �� _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ 2' ,�. - ._. - �- -flrsT r nd'2R¢}Z 5ET A>'��V-; JAAI.i I'r�v L£I-L-L.L-./�ANti FD s.ri - _ -_ _- _ _ `#1�$ _ --„� -".:B �yA"Y.iC - EL.,f•.�' ,;' _ - - f7&_}3 __ 3--_ _ - _ - Eta ANP- _ _ V SGNTNGI➢TOWN 15244 n.wN -- � - 11 _ cT /n�a..1I-Foc_a Air- - -¢'-: Ga2fi1r1419- A,IAS• T®_LlP-'r-Q - - - ��� 2- _ -_ ____ - m' -_ _ - fa'..oli8� ..- - _ _ _ A-e-'PFtre- �Ak E- IF+v�_Y�Y Ei. jfwYt.�'e.c� - _ - _ PLANNING BGPRO 8T9Tp VO�� - 54. crw. - --- b ' kflm- I" � t s- -� �-� �x.���� -. f_e- ji- 5 T�fi� i`"� _ t.4 - - _ G -5t6 765 . .. mc�s-Y'La' '' r OF ' --S LSL c/GF - - - - - - - - 4. INF,t-TP./+TI�P� PH ccih561;51 Yj G.F- W9�.-F� A->`>` �¢�¢t3lft _ enolr Qi' ,' 'AC"17-; - _17F- 7f F'F[2�>k dam- _ _ !--V- = I/S" - l Y - _- _ . _ - _ h'�. e4TP�vv�P oY N.-Y- S-I-A`_3 - F--�7.H. - - - - _ _ ,.^_ .-_.�"_ -_ __ _ - _ i ce- - _ _ _ . ,- _ _�_ _ .__.,_ A, - ---_ ---'----`--__- __ _ _ I' _ -'-_ _'- _ _ _ --- _ - - __"_ _ _"'-__ ___ _ - _ - _--_- --- - - - ---- - - - - - -as - - --- - --- - - ----- - ----" ---- -- --- - -- - - - - -- - - . a, - - - - - - - .,�.,- '- - �, f � i 0 t 4 SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$WEIR / APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ONLM FLOW/ H.S RFF, NO. C/O-'9S-pao that spPand w l ganaeB y or the tieconstr aM to of the VB And 1 y r Code and Is not An expressed nor l lmpispRo ou VaaY Shn'Uscnarge hunt or occupy the SIrmA4r+mr ... in;S APPR AL EXPIRES RYO 17I YEARS fkUN. iHi PATE BELOW. ' i Fro _ CNJ, E Q.n-._., t ':,. .. r.. •, ', 7)ye Cro' ce. OF Qo//c�laN Go...7+-oG fp27TlE .S4l/M. . S1EnEo , ii-E aRcyr 1. f F� 4 R T S T ANG r 1 .� GAR ETT A . Iia? LOCATieNS141" architect auiE..xe. $aP.-� ' LYILHE 9.i. 4 " /' 'F.a'1L' ./ Main Rroad P.O. Box 1412 Southold N.Y. 11971 kTe',.L_ t q - r1x' A V, 'X" SrAr=oOF NO�e4` 516 . 765 5455 CRAW4 BY w I PROJECT NP-