Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1000-35.-2-14 (1)Ht~LLENIC, LOGATION MAP C' N NOTES 'r'cPI~AL E:4.-II~JID PLANTIN~ T'f~ED TO tD~ N E NOTES: '%. ,© 'T'C~IGAL i t~l~I= PLANTIN~ T~EES The ~ears ~'om th 400 Ymxng & Young PAVEMENT, I/~IALK;5 * C, UI~BIN~ LE~,EN~ 4 CITE DATA TOTAL AREA =' I.DIqO AC, I~D EN¢INEEI~'~ C,,Et~.TI PIC.,ATIoN JOHN ~IANNA~I5 HELLENIC, ~NA~.K BAt~ 514D MAIN ROAD EAST MAR. ION, NEY, I ~O~K IIq~q RB~TAU~ANT HELLENIC, tR EOTAUtRANT LANDSGAPE ~ ALI~NIMI=NT PLAN ] N'r'SDOT C,,2ee No: 04-&4P OF 4 r E ~AVEHENT, I~IAJ-t~ IJ CUf~BIN~ IlEal=ND 4 GOI~TI~JJ~TION NOTE~ I~R.AINA~,E LE~EN.I~ ~ o¢~ ~°~ o¢ TE-~T HOLE TH#1 \ / / / / \ \ / / \ \ \ I I I I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,,, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,, / N S 7~o~¢~ ~I~.AINA~. GA, I.GULATION~ E \ \ % \ Yo~'rtg & Young I ~ANITAR¥ I~E~IeN GRI~ERIA ~t GALGULATION~ EN~II',IEE~'~ GEte,.TIFIGATION JOHN ~ IANNAW. I~ Ht:=LL~NIC.. ~NAC.,K. E3AI~. 514~ I~AIN ROAD ' ~A~T MAP. ION, NE~ 'r'ORK (- ~.IE~TAUP. ANT HEILENI~ W,,E~TAUt~NT Al, EOz'[: M~rlon, To~n o{= ~oubhold ~uFFolK GounOd, No~ York [ ~t~..ADIN~ , DI~a',.INAGE tm/AN ] NY'~POT Gc~eo No: 04-84F' ,2 oF 4- ./ I=REN~H DRAIN 5EGTION NT5 C.,ONC,,t~E1 ~ '.GIIDEINAL.K .~EC, TION ~,HE ~ ~.Ai ~ LO(~ATION I, NITHIN FREN~.H DRAIN SINALE NT5 :? 00000000 ,~ 7.'- ~ 00000000 00000000 -~ CAT~;H BA5IN 2' x 4' FLUSH ¢t~aTE NT~ ASPHALT PAV~HIENT SE¢.,TION 5TORJ,4 I,"~A"f'El~.. LEA~,HIN~ POOL NT5 Yo~zng & Yo'~ng JOHN ~IANNAP-.15 HELLENIC, 5NAcS, K. DAP-. 5145 ~AIN P-.OAID EA5T MAP. ION, NEIAI 'fORK IIqDq P-.E~TAUP. ANT HE LLt=NIO TAU NT A~ Ec~mf, Morion, To~n o~ ~ou~hold SuFfolk ¢~ounb~, N¢~ 'fork DETAILO N¥~DOT O~¢ No: 04-84P END ~ ROAD WOR~ i i,I lg 5O (1~14-I DO) ZONE ~-4o MAINTENENC, E $ PR. OTEOTION OP ~FFIC E:,EC, TION CN ¥ 5 r:,.o rJ ~R. IVEINA¥ 5EGTION N.T 5 .GEC~TION I E~C, TION AOPHALT PA'v~N~NT C, ON51't~U~,TION ~EOU~N~,E OF OPEf~.AtION¢: PHACE I PHASE II PHA¢E III NOTE: Young & Young C~O~N~TRI. JC. TION NOI"E~ ASPHALT PAVEMtENT ~,ONSTR, DC,,TION: D~IVEPLAY C. ONS"FtRUC.,TION! LEGEND 5Ut~V'EYOI~'.G GEle..TIFIC. ATION JOHN ~IANNA~IS HELLENIC, SNACK BAR 514~ ~AIN ROAD EAST MARION, NE~ ~O~K IIqD~ ~-BSTAUP. ANT HELLt=NIC, t= E TAUf ANT At; Eos~ Morion, To~n oF Sou~holct' SuFFolk Ooun~l, N*~ York MAIN'rENANGE ~ Pi,~OTEC, TION OF 'r'RAPFI6 PLAN OF 4 ~INO BOARD J~RILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLL'kM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOV~rN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ~M.)DRESS: P.O. Bo× 1179 Southold. NY 11971 OFFICE LI)CATION: Town l-hdl Annex 54375 State Route 25 tcor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave..~ Southotd, 5rk' Telephone: 631 765-1038 Fax: 631 765-3136 September 13, 2005 Mr. George Giannads 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan Hellenic Restaurant Located on the n/s/o NY State 25, approximately 532' w/o Shipyard Lane in East Madon SCTM#1000-35-2-t4 Zone: LB District Dear Mr. Giannaris: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, September 12, 2005: The final public hearing was closed. WHEREAS, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on a 1.519 acre parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o State Road 25, approximately 532' w/o Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM# '1000-35-2-14; and WHEREAS, Hellenic Land, LLC, is the owner of the property: and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2003, a formal amended site plan application was submitted for approval; and WHEREAS, on December 30, 2004, the East Marion Fire District recommended that the fire protection is adequate and the Planning Board accepts this recommendation; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 2005, the Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed ar application for a front yard variance, and granted approval under Appeal Number 5699 with one condition which the Planning Board incorporates in this approval; and Paqe Two-Hellenic Restaurant-September 13, 2005 WHEREAS on June 24, 2005, the Southold Town Building Inspector reviewed and certified the site plan for "Restaurant" use; and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2005, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, established itself as the lead agency and, as lead agency, made a determination of non-significance and granted an amended Negative Declaration; and WHEREAS, on July 27, 2005, The New York State Department of Transportation approved a Highway Work Permit #10-05-0256 (SR 25, Main Rd), East Madon; and WHEREAS, on August 30, 2005, The Southold Town Engineering Inspector reviewed and approved the proposed drainage and the Planning Board has accepted his recommendations; and WHEREAS, on September 6, 2005, The Architectural Review Committee reviewed and granted conditional approval on the architectural drawings and associated site plan materials, and the Planning Board accepted this approval and determined it to be satisfactory; and WHEREAS, the following items are incorporated and included in the site plan: 1. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible from adjacent properties and roadways. Lighting fixtures shall focus and direct the light in such a manner as to contain the light and glare within the property boundaries. It is a general principle of the town that parking lot lights should be turned off or reduced in intensity between 11:30 p.m. and 4:00 a.m. The lighting must meet Town Code requirements. 2. All signs shall meet Southold Town Codes and shall be subject to the approval of the Southold Town Building inspector. 3. The applicant shall guarantee the survival of all required landscaping for a pedod of five years from the date of final site inspection; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board has reviewed the proposed action under the policies of the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program and has determined that the action is consistent provided that the best management practices outlined in the September 1, 2005 memo prepared by the LWRP coordinator are implemented; and be it further Pa.qe Three-Hellenic Restaurant-September 13, 2005 RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant final approval of the site plan prepared and Young and Young, dated October 12, 2004, and last revised September 6, 2005 and authorize the Chairperson to endorse the final site plans subject to a one year review from the date of issuance of the building permit. Enclosed are two copies of the approved site plan, one for your records and one to be submitted to the Building Department when you apply for your building permit. If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact this office. Very truly yours, W odhouse Chairperson encs. cc: Building Department Town Engineering Inspector Zoning Board of Appeals pI~'NING BOARD M~MBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIA.NO V~ILLIA]VI J. CREMERS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Or'~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs AvL Southold, NY Fax: 681 765-3186 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN New Change ~ Use Re-use -' ion ~'Revlslon of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: SCTM#: Location: Address: Name of= Applicant: Address of/tgpllcan~;: Telephone: Owner of Land: 4000- 35 2 Iq Agent or Person responsible for appllcaUon: Si? plans prepared by: Telephone: Planning Board Site Plan Application STATE OF NEW YORK COUNIY OF SUFFOU( '~ofl~ (~ ~N/cR~. ¢~ being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at In ~e S~te ¢ New Y~k, and ~a~ he Is ~ ~e above pro~, or ~a~ he Is ~e of ~e (Specl~ w~er ~ne~h~p or Corp.) which is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land whldl are not shown on the Site Plan; that the title to the entJre parcel, Including alt rights-of-way, has been dearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan Infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that L'he plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be installed in strict accordance With the plans submitted. Signed fPartner or Corporate Officer and Tltlel Sworn to me this (Notary POblTc) RICHARD FEEHAN Note~y l~blic ~ate o[New Yo~ Page 3 Planning Board Site Plgn Application Tota{ Land Area of Site (acres or square feet} Zoning District --Existing Use of' Site ,~0 b~7'~NrL,~xJ/' .. ?reposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing. Indicate which bulldlng will have wl~lch use. If' more than one use is proposed per building, Indicate square footage of= floor area that will be reserved per use. oross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) '~_Oross Floor Area of Proposed Structure{s) ~.__Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) ~-/'~'-Percent Of Lot for Parking (where applicable) _Percent of Lot for Landscap ng (where applicable) Has ~ppllcant been granted a variance and/or special exception by _Board of Appeals - Case # & date _Board of Trustees -'Case # & dat~ NY S~ate Department of' Environmental Conservation - Case # & date . ~Suffolk County Department Health Services- Case # & date ~O~,~ ~ Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision _Expiration Date Other _Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Boar~ of Health, be stored or handled at the site? if so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of' permit Issued. NO ACT/ON (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCT/ON! MAY BE UNDE, qTAKE~N UNT/L APP£OVAL OF S/TE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to comptete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation, if information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Name of ApplicantJSponsor ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ,-_i Address 3L----~ ,J~/~"~[-(' City/PO ~. ~.4.~r~)lJ Business Telephone ~'~ Name of Owner (if different) Address City I PO __ Business Telephone State Zip Code Description of Action: Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undevelop~ areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban [] Industrial L.i'Commercial [] Forest [] Agriculture [] Other D Residential (suburban) D Rural (non-farm) APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc,) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated {Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) PRESENTLY acres AFTER COMPLETION acres 1'5~ acres acres "-~) acres eorss .5' aor. acres .~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: [~e~l drained [0tO % of site [] Moderately well drained % of site. Poorly drained __% of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes [] No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~10-10% ~) % r'~10.15%__% . r"115% or greater % 6. Is project substantiall~ontiguous tov~ contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? LJ Yes L~ No Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [] Yes F~No 9. DYes 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Whet is the depth of the water table? ~-~ {in feet) Is site located over a primary, principal or sole sourqe aquifer? Page 3 of 21 UNo []Yes ~No r"l l"-i, 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is idsntified as threatened or endangered;' I.IYes According to: Identify each species: 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? I--Ives Er.o Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r-lv.s If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [--~Yes , '~No 15. Streems within or contiguous to project ama: e~ Nome of Stream snd nsma of River to which it is tributa~ 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project araa: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 1 7. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? [~Yes b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection7 DNo F~Yes ~1No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 26-AA, Section 303 and 3047 DYes [~o 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yas 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~] Yes [~o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project {fiji in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: J ' ~)~acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ?O~t ~ acres initially; "0 (~0 f acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~/o~, acres. d. Length of project, in miles: j~- (if appropriate) .[.. e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed.._.~.% f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ ? ; proposed ~['~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ~ height; /-~ 7 width; ~ length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~-q~. ~ ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) wiJl be removed from the site? ~.~ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed f~Yes DNo [] N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation7 ~Yes [] No c, Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation7 [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site~)~ ~0 ~' Page 5 of 21 Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: '~-q months, (including demolition) d. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes ~ No Number of jobs generated: during construction If multi-phased: Total number of phases anticipated f (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: __ month Approximate completion date of final phase: __ month __ Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases;' year, (including demolition) year. []Yes D No 9. ~ ; after project is complet_e 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [] Yes [] No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes []No a. If yes, ;.,ldicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [] Yes [] No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? []Yes ['~No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes r~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? [] Yes [] No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used7 [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ~'~Yes Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: i=-I 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? I lYes I~=JNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site. life? __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? DYes [~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? EYes []No 20, Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels7 DYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity~__ gallons/minute. 23, Total anticipated water usage per day I[~O0 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [] Yes ~No if ,/es, explain: Page 7 ol~ 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board [~/'Yes O No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~Yes O No City, Town Zoning Board DYes ~No City, County Health Department Other Local Agencies r-]Yes [~No Other Regional Agencies ]Yes [~No State Agencies I-l.o Federal Agencies DYes ~No' Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes ~'No If Yes, indicate decision required: D Subdivision D Other Page 8 of 21 What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? I What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? DNo la the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a '~ mile? proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /~J/~ If the a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes []'o~ 11. Will the proposed actio~,,a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? DYes L~J No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes D. informational Details DYes E~No DNo Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verifioatis.~ I certif'/ that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. / / onsor~e ~ ~/~). ~,~F//~j-~jA~'~[' Date Signature If the action is In the Coastal Area, end you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assasament Form before proceeding with this Page 10 of 21 473889 SOUTEOLD NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY~ · SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SCg ~PRCLS 421 RESTAU~T 35.-2-14 5145 MAIN RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO === GIAh~qARIS JOHN & ORS C/OANNA GI~NNARIAS PO BOX 506 EAST MARION NY 11939 =MISC RS-SS 1 BANK DATE : 12/17/20~ ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 04 ........ = ..... ASSESSMENT DATA ......... **CURRENT** RES PERCENT LAND 3,200 **TAXABLE** TOTAL 13,100 COUNTY 13,100 ''PRIOR** TOWN 13,100 LAND 3,200 SCHOOL 13,100 TOTAL 13,100 ==DIMENSIONS ===l .... === SALES ACRES 1.25 IBOOK I SALE DATE 00/00/00 [PAGE 00030 PR OWNER ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE (FD026 ~PK065 ~WW020 ~SW011 FI=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=G0 TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF INFORMATION .................................. VALUE F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU SITE PI,AN STATUS REPORT SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED ~'"NEW WITHDRAWN INCOMPLETE LOCATION: _~'/~zf/J~,~ ,,t',,,~.~ " HAMLET: ]PROJECT USE: SCTM# 1000- 3& - ,2- - ?q · ~'/~,,/ OWNERNAME: ~,a..~o.c,<.. ,.~J;.~ ,~ ~ flZ~ APPLICANT NAN,.E: ~/~ ~ ~ ~ TEL~ ('//) ~6 - ~ AGENTN~E: /Ja~o~ ~ TEL~( )~-~ IPROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR /~.~ IN THE/~_ ZONE LOCATED AT IN .~. SCTM# 1000- - - ]~ ~EE ~OVE). ACRES PARCEL BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUIRED Y OR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRED Y OR N PRE-SUBMISSION WRITTEN REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUEST) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: PRE-WORK SESSION: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE:. .. / ,' PAYMENT RECEIVED: FEE AMOUNT: ($300.X =$ , APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: AMOU'N [ RECEIVED:$ )*($.05 X , SF=$ )--$ NEW APPLICATION WORK SESSION (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT) DATE / / / UNCOORDINATED:__ (TYpE.f :__ TYPE2: UNLISTED: REFERRED TO: STZB~, ,ETBD ,STC.tTB , dH , STBT , STE ,SCDHS .NYSDEC ~kqACORPS NYSDOT SCWA SCPD $CDPW ~SEQRA DETERMINATION :NEG DEC Y OR N, APPROVALS REQUIRED: REFERRED DATI NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES ARCHIIECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: /. , / I k$/o !BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: /~,~ ~.~__r[O~.* /~ ~ ~0' / / ~EP.OF T~NSPORTATION: DOT~, Dff~, TOS / / / / O~/~ct.~ ~ SUFFOLK GOUNW DEPARTMENT OF P~NNING: / / / / ;UFFOLK COUNW DEPT OF HEALTH: PERMIT $: / / )P~ONAL APPROVALS: "YS DEC WET~NDS~IDAUSPDES ~ / / / pLANNING BOARD DECISIONS: DENIED: , APPROVED:, ENDORSEMENT OF SrTE pLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: CONDITIONAL FINAL: / / DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / / TOWN ENG __ GENEEAL NOTES: PS' SITE PLAN__ Presub Ynission ¢orfference (~vithin 30 clays of written request) Complete application rece red (~vithin 4 months (ff presub, conference) Application revie~ved a( work session (*/ithin lO days of receipt) Applicant advised of necessary revisions (wi{hin 30 days or ceview) Revised submission received Lead Agency Coordination SEQRA determination REFERRED TO: g Board of Appeals (written comments within 60 days of request) Board of Trustees V~Building Department (certification) · Suffolk County Department of Planning v/D'/epartment of Transportation -State artment of Transportation - County elk County Dept. of llealth ~ Commissioners Sent: . , Received: RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions Filed Covenants and Restrictions Landscape plan Lighting plan Curb Cut approval lle~tlt D, apD~ ~v/ewed by Engineer ,\l:proval of site plan -with conditions E~ldorsement of site plan Certificate of Occupa~cy inspection year r~?vioxv PLANNING BOARD M~EMB~ R~CI-L~RD G. WARD Chairman GEORGE RITCRIE LATI-L-XM, JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. WILLIAM J. CRF~MERS KENNETI-I L. EDW.~RDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town ~tn]l. 53095 ~fafn Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, Yew York 11971 Fa:,((516) 765-3136 Telephone (516) 765- 1938 Oate Received Date CompleTed Filing Fee New Change of Use Re-use Ex:ens~on Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Loca[lon: Address: Name of Applicant: Address of Applican[:: Teleplqone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for application: Address: Telepl'lone: Site plans prepared Dy: LJcense No.: Address: Telephone: FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PtAN~ JAN 1 2ouo 7~7- Page 2 APPUCANT"S AFFIDAvIT 5-q'ATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK in the Stare of New YorK, and UndO)he is he aPave property, ~Tl~ie) being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at or thatrjne is the (Specify whether Par~nershiD or CORD.) whiCh IS hereby making application; thai: there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are nog shown on the Site Plan; that the title ~o the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been cleanv established and is shown on said Plan; that no par~ o~ the P~an infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that ne nas examined all rules and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or cnangecl in any manner without the apbroval of the Planning Board; and mat me actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordanc9 with the plans submitted. · -) S,gned . (/ ~Partner or Corporate Of'aL~r anci Titlel Sworn to me this day MEUSSA MoOOWAN Ou~lltl~l in Suffolk Page ~ Planning Board Site Plan Application Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning Distdct ExistingUseofSite I(¢s~c~t v HC~{ ~,~ Proposed Uses on Site. Show all uses proposed and existing, indicate which building will have which use, ~f more than one use is proposed per building, indtcate square footage of floor are~ that will be rese~ed per use. OrossFIoorAreaofExJstingStructure(s) /'~(.* .5'¢-~ /n~"~iL Gross FIoorArea of Proposed Structure(s) ¢~,c~-&.O (7¢~¢' Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot ~r Pa~ing (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been g~nted a variance and/or special exception by~ Board ¢ ~peals - Case ¢ & date Board ~ Trustees - Case ~ & date NY State Depa~men~ of Environmental Conse~ation - Case ¢ & date Suffolk Ooun~ Oepa~ment Health Se~ices - Case ¢ & date ~/o --~ Case Number Name of ~plicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been obtained? Name of issuing agency Number and date of permit issued. NO ACT/ON (EXCAVATION 0£ CONSTPUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APP£OVAL OF SITE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. V/OZATO£S A£E SUBJECT TO P£OSECUT/ON. Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLENIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Lon~ EAF. Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to primary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District include the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Health Department Site Plan last dated December 12, 2002 indicates the following dimensions: Variance Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Required Units 1 & 2 26.43' N.A. N.A. N.A. Units 3 & 4 N.A. 10.99' N.A. Side Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. 12.05' N.A. Side Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A. 20.00' Rear Yard Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 23.64' Rear Yard Page 2 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Description of Existine and Prooosed Site Use, etc_ Existin~ Site Use, etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for 5 of the 17 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 15 feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, 1 residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. Proposed Site Use. etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 10 unit motel complex. The proposed structures include retaining the existing restaurant and 10 new motel units in 5 buildings. The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the motel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 10.99 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20.00 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 6,300 gpd (10 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 7,000 gpd. Informational Details and Water SunDly Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. Page 3 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 16, 2002). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. 617.20 Appendix A State-Environmental Quality Revie~ FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an order be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy t a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determi knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of., The full EAF is intended to provide a method wherebv applicants and agencies can I ~on process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of FAF completed for this project: ~ I Part1 II Part2 ~ IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and impor[ance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: r--~ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, one which will not have a is significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONFD negative declaration will be prepared,* The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions .l-I l r. Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Dc: -7-/04..t3 . Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) websire Page 1 of 21 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor Address .5'-J ¥ 5- ~/~ .,,z)-'~V' Ci~/PO ~ ~0~ Business Telephone ~7~-- State ~ Zip Code Name of Owner (if different) Address City / PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: .'N Page 2 of 21 Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: [] Urban ~lndustrial [] Commercial r"] Forest [] Agriculture [] Other r']Residential (suburban) E~ Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: J' ~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) ~-~1~,47X2~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION · ~' acres , ~'e~. acres O acres ~ acres ~) acres ~ acres ~ acres O acres ~ acres ~ acres ~ acres f ~ acres ~ acres /,~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? ~1~,~- ~ ~ a. Soil drainage: F'~well drained ~,/'~ % of site ~']Poorly drained O % of site lr~Moderately well drained '~ % of site. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4- of the NYS Land Classification System? ~V,~"~ acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? [] Yes ~E~ No a. What is depth to bedrock ~/, ~ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~"']O-lO%/..~L% [~1o-15% O % ~'~ 15% or greaterC) r~No is project substantial~ontiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State er National Registers of Historic Places? [ [ Yes r~ No 7. is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~ Yes ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table?~'2~ ~,,~! (in feet) 9. Is site [ocated over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? r~Yes [] No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r~ Yes Page 3 of 21 I 1. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: [~]Yes [~No Identify each species: 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ~lYes ~]No Describe: 1 3. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? E~Yes [~No If yes, explain: 1 4. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ['--]Yes ~No .I 1 5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 1 6. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (m acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? []Yes [~]No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection7 [~JYes J~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r~Yes []No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical £nvJroomental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? [~]¥es [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: ~' *~ acres initially; ~,~' ~ acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: O acres. d. Length of project, in miles: /~'.~ (if appropriate} e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed. ~f-/~ % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: h. if residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Initially Ultimately Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: [~] Yes ENo acres. proposed ~ /4OTE~ (upon completion of project)? Two Femily Multiple Family height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? Will disturbed areas be reclaimed r-~Yes []No []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? O width; 4~o ft. tons/cubic yards. Condominium length. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation7 [] Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? Page 5 of 21 Will blasting occur during construction7 ~ Yes r~ No Number of jobs generated: during construction Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r-]Yes ~"J No If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: __ months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: Total number of phases anticipated J (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: f month ~4:}O~t~year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: ~/m~on~t~ __ year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [] Yes [] No 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . 1 1. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? r~ Yes ,~.,~; after project is complete ]No [f yes, explain: 12. ts surface liquid waste disposal involved? I I Yes I)%1No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ,~Yes ~]No Type ~,~,~/~'~ 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? IIYes ~-I No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [] Yes ~No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~'~ Yes ~ No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ~,~"~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [] Yes [] No c. If yes, give name ~ ~ ~'~'.,~A~) location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? [] Yes Page 6 of 21 e. If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~]Yes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? __ tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? __ years. t8. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [-']Yes r~lNo (~¥~z:&."'~/' /~'~ 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~--'] YeseS]No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels7 [--]Yes ~]No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~--] Yes r~ No if yes, indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~,, ~ gallons/day. ~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ~'~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: gallons/minute. ~o~t ~ 700 Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board F-] Yes [] No City, Town, Village Planning Board r'~Y~s r'-'l No city, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department r~ Yes Other Local Agencies F'lYes [] No Other Regional Agencies F"'I Yes [] No State Agencies r~Yes [~ No Federal Agencies r'-] Yes [] No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes r~ No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan r~ Site plan r~ special use permit [] Resource management plan r~ Subdivision F~ Other Page 8 of 21 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? What is the proposed zoning of the site? I 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local Jand use plans? ~] Yes [] No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¥~ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding [and uses with a ~ mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~/~ a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? ~/',~r OYes [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes ~] No Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? r~Yes [~]No a. If yes, is ex st ng capac ty sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels7 a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. []Yes ]Yes [] No J-'lNo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature ~ Date If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · in compreting the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. if answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. identifying that an Impact wJJl be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in co!utah 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large · Mitigated by impact Impact Project Change Impact on Land 1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project site? NO [] [] Examples that would apply to column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, ( 15 foot rise per 100 foot ol~ length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. Page 11 of 21 Construction or expansion of a santary landfill. Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact impact Project Change I"q [] ~Yes ~No [] ~ r~No [] r~Ye~ F~o Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.) r-].o []YES Specific land forms: [] ~Yes r~No Impact on Water 3. Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated es protected? (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) [~]NO [~] YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Developable area of site contains a protected water body. Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. Other impacts: [] ~ ~o [] []Yes F~No [] ~Yes ~No [] ~Yes [~]No [] ~Yes F"'] NO Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [3"0 r~YEs Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or mere than a 10 acre increase or decrease, Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: I ] [] Yes [] E~es ]No r--]No r--]No Page 12 of 21 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? I'-I.° fi×amples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require e discharge permit. Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. Proposed Action requires watar supply from walls with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capecity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural ~;onditions. Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] F~ 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated by Project Change ~'-~ Yes ONe I-iv. []~e~ [3"0 r-l~ I-l.o E]~- E].o OYes ONe []Yes I--I~o I-lYe, CI.o r~es [] No Page 13 of 21 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff?. Examples that would, apply to column 2 Proposed Action would change flood water flows Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: [] J~lYes []No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will Proposed Action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: I [] r-'lYes r-lNo [] r-]Yes []No [] I--lYes [].o [] [] I--1Ye~ [].o F-1 [] []Yes [] [] []Yes I-'iNo IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near the site, or found on the site. [] []Yes r"'lNo Page 14 of 21 Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. Otl~er impacts: I 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by Impact Project Change [] I--lYes I--].o r-i I-Iv. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non- endangered species? I--'] .0 r--FES £xamples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratow fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action mquiras the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. Other impacts: I-I []Ve~ I-I.o []Yes r']No I'-] I--l*e~ I--].o IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? E×amples that would apply to column 2 The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, omhard, etc.) Gonatruction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than t 0 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District, more than 2.5 acme of agricultural land. [] I, Iv~ [].o [] []Yes ['-]No [] I--IVes Page 15 of 21 The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff). Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change r']Yes E]No I IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use the Visual EAr Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. Other impacts: [] Elves F'].o [] E]Yes I-l.o [] []Yes [] F'lYes [].o IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, prehistoric or paleontological importance? Fl.° ElvES Examplee that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or Nationel Register of historic places. Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Page 16 of 21 Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated by impact Project Change [] I--I~e~ r'-INo IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts: IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)? List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: [] I--l~es I--I.o [] r-l~ I'-INo [] I--l~e~ []No [] r--l~es l--INo [] r-q~es I--]No Page 17 of 21 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 Potential Large Impact 15. Will there be an effect to existing transporta[ion systems? [] ~o []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16. Will Proposed Action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? I-I~o I--IYE~ Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: I NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? I-1No I-lYEs Examples that would apply to column 2 Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: [] [] [] [] Page 18 of 21 3 Can impact Be Mitigated by Project Change ]Yes []No []Yes r']No I,Iyes [].o ]Yes [] No []yes r-l.o ]Yes []No r']Yes []No []Yes []No CYes r--]No []Yes •No 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardoue substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or them may be a chronic low level disoher§e or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of ~hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied aetural gas or other flammable liquids. Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. Other impacts: [] []~es I-'l.o [] []~s [] []Ye~ r'l.o [] I-I~ IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAC3rER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community? Examples that would apply to column 2 The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. Proposed Action will cause e change in the density of land use. Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will create a demand tar additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) [] I-']~. [].o [] [~Yes [] 'INa [] I--l~e~ I-'1.o [] I--]~s I--I"o [] I--I~es [].o Page 19 of 21 Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated by Impact Impact Project Change [] [] r'qYes [].o 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environment impacts? r-'l.o []YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Page 20 of 21 Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions (Jr you need more space, attach additional sheets) Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently iost resoumes of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. Page 21 of 21 ii Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLENIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Long FAF, Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to primary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District include the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Health Department Site Plan last dated December 12, 2002 indicates the following dimensions: Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Variance Reouired Units 1 & 2 26.43' N.A. N.A. N.A. Units 3 & 4 N.A. 10.99' N.A. Side Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. 12.05' N.A. Side Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A. 20.00' Rear Yard Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 23.64' Rear Yard Page 2 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use. etc. Existin~t Site Use. etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for 5 of the 17 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 15 feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, 1 residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. Proposed Site Use. etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 10 unit motel complex. The proposed structures include retaining the existing restaurant and 10 new motel units in 5 buildings. The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the motel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 10.99 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20.00 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 6,300 gpd (10 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 7,000 gpd. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. Page 3 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 o A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 16, 2002). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: Co the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. PART 1--PROJECT INFORMAT~ Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Par~s A through E, Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification'and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF wil) be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavalJable, so indicate and specify each instance. Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use: C]Urban DJndustriaJ r-lCommerciar ~Residential (suburban) E~Rural (non-farm) E]Forest E]Agriculture E]Other 2 Total acreage of project area: ~'~ acres APPROXIMATI~ ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFT~)R. C~MPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) .~1~1~,1~' acres ~,, acres Forested O acres . O acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, croplar~d, pasture, etc.) O acres . ~) ., acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as Der Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Q acres O acres Water Surface Area ~) acres O acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) . ~ /' I acres O*~t' acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0,4' acres ~)* ~' acres Other (Indicate type), L,~e~% f lan~t$cap~,~· -- -- O. ~ acres -. ~.O acres 3. What is predominant soil type{s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ~ii~Well drained /g~O % of site {;~v~oderately well drained O % of site ~lPoorJ¥ drained ~ % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of sell are classified wi£hln soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS L~d Classification System? .~/,~. acres. (See '1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ,~Ye5 a. What is depth to bedrock~ . _, /~J. ~l' · _ (in feet) (~iD5% or greater I~ ,. % 6. Is proiect substantially con:iguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places~ ~Ye5 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? F-lYes 8. What ,s the depth of the water table? 1'~/'2,~lin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes DNo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area~ '[]Yes I~o 11 Does project si:e contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? F3yes ~,No According to ~ ~' Identify each species 12 Are there any unique ~r unusual land forms on the prolect site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) r-lyes [~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [~]Yes 1~o If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ~lYes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream.and name of River to which it is tributary _ 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ~/~A - a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~.Yes '~lNo a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? I~Yes F"INo b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~)i~fes I-INo 18 Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? CiYes 19 Is the si:e located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? [~Yes B. Project Description !. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor Project acreage to bd developed: ~--~*'~ acres initially; Prolect acreage to remain undeveloped ~) acres. acres. acres ultimately. d. Length of project, in miles: ~,~ ~ (If appropriate) ,~. the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposec~ .6; f Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~; proposed . g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ (upon completion of project)? ~~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~. ~. One Family Two Family MuJtip)e Family Condominium Imtia[ly Ultimately t Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height; w~dth; ~ lengt['.. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~ ft. 2.-How much natural material (Orock, earth, etc.) will be removed from .... ~) tons/cubic yards 3. Wil~. dtsturbed areas be reclaimed? ~ib'es ,~No ~N/A 7'0 /1~11~/~ ~ , a. If yes. for what mtended purpose is the site being reclaimed? ~ b WJJ~ topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation~ ~Yes ~No c will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~Yes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers} will be removed from site? ~a ~ acres 5 Will any mature forest (over ~00 years old) or other locally-important vegetabon be removed by this projectZ ~Yes 6. If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction ~ . months. [indudin~ demolition]. 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated ~ (number)., b. Anticipated d~te of commencement phase 1 ~'~onth ~ year, (including demolition). d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~Yes ~o 8. Will blastinB occur durin~ cons(ruction? ~Yes ~No 9. Number of jobs 8enerated: durin~ construction ~ : after project is complete . ~0. Number of iobs eliminated by this project 11. Will pro)ect require relocation of any projec~ or facilities~ ~Yes ~o If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? DYes .~il, No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~3'es [~No Type 34. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain · 15 I$ project or any portion of project located m a 100 year flood plain~ [~Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? il,Yes I~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month ~-.5 tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~'Yes ~'lNo r-)yes d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage d~sposaJ system or into a samtary landfill? 17. WiU the pro,eot involve the dbposa~ of solid waste? ~Yes ~o a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of d~sposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what ~s the anticipated s~ce life? year~. 18. will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~ 1~ Will project routinel~ produce odors (more than one hour per day}? ~Yes ~0 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ~Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use~ ~Yes ~No If yes , indicate type(s) -- ' ~ ' ~ 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping cap~c~,~D~ 8allon~/minute.~, 23 Total anticipated water usage Der day~ ~llons~av. -II 24 Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? DYes ~No · ~ If Yes, explain 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City. Town, Village Board r~Yes ~Jo City. Town, Village Planning Board ~i~Yes E']No City. Town Zoning Board BYes City, County Health Department {i~Yes Other Local Agencies r-lYes ~J~o Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~J~No State Agencies C]Yes Federal Agencies r-Wes C. Zoning and Planning Information I Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~'Yes I~No if Yes, indicate decision required: C2zoning amendment j~oning variance I~special use permit []subdivision F'~nev~/revision of master plan C')resource management plan [~)other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? L.~-- L~tY'~c~ ~'(,cIJ~.,S ~i~site plan 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? the' propose° zoning ot the si .. .- ' - s 5. What is the maximum potential ~t~e~ ~' development ~ite if developed as pertained by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~es ~No 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~ mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/. mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /~..~.. a. What iS the minimum lot size proposed~ ~1~ t , 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~]Yes ,,~No ~1. Wile the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, pohce, fire protection)? ]~Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proiected demand? ,~i[Yes t-iNa 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes E3No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project, It [here are or may be any adverse ~mpact$ associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate Or avoid them. E. Verification . I certify t~:~4~,~3rmation p~ovided above is true to the best of my~kn0 5~gnatur~ w" '~' '" Title ~-~ .~"r'~/-~' .... , If.the a~~ ar~ncy, complete the Coastal Assessment Form be/ore proceeding . ,: 14-16-2 {9/95)--7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part I [] Part 2 I-IPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I-1 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration ~111 be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Hellenic Name of Action Southold Town Planning Board Name of Lead Agency Bennett Orlowski Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Chairman Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMA'I ,,~N Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a s[gmticarlt effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Hellenic LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address. MunlclpMIty end County) 5145 Main Road, Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR John Giannaris BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516 } 765-4330 ADDRESS c/o Patricia C. Moore, Esq.~ 51020 Main Road CiTY/PO I STATE I ZIP CODE Southoid NY 1197! NAME OF OWNER {If different) ) BUSINESS TELEPHONE I ( ADDRESS CITY/PO STATE I ZIP COOE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N,A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed a'nd undeveloped area~. 1. Present land use: I-IOrban I-Ilndustrial eICommercial [qResidential (suburban) [:]Forest [:]Agriculture I-IOther 2. Total acreage of project area: 1 1/2 plus leas~tre~.arking.76; 2.2848 total acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested . acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads. buildinss and otheroaved surfaces ~ "7~'~ acres /':t, ~/'~. acres Other (Indicate type) Lanascaping/Turf /, 5-~.6,',~ acres _ /' ~(L- ._ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site~ H- A A a. Soil drainage: Ii(IWell drained 100 % of site F'lModerately well drained % of site I-IPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land Is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY5 Land Classification System~ N/A acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcropplhgs on 1~/'9iect site~' OYes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock! .... '~/~ (in feet) I-IRural (non-farm) · .5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes' ~0-10% % O10-15% % O15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, s~te, or district, listed on the State or the Nationa( Registers of Historic Places;? OYes [~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I--lYes ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table;? . 17 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes UNo 10 Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area;? [~Yes ~]No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? l-lyes (~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site;? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) l-lYes [~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area;? E]Yes f~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? C]Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: none a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities~ R'lyes r'lNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow Connection? ~lYes i-iNo b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~]Yes i-INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3047 I-lYes I~lNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~' I-lYes [~No ' 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes~' aYes QJNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 2. 2848 b. Project acreage to be developed: 2. 2848 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain unde eloped 0 N~A acres. d. Length of project, in mi es: (If appropriate) arr-, 0.7658 leased from .... SCWA acres ultimately. e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 10 %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~ ; proposed /~ J4f'ac'~ g.. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour .. (upon' completion of project)~' h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: /'f;'7~- Cottages One Family Two Family Multiple Family C=ndam~aima Initially 20 units 12 units Ultimately · . 1 story 30' ~' h (see site plan i. D,menslons On feet) of largest proposed structure _ __ height; width: __ lengt . . ...... 409 87r. (~Lr$ RT.25A) j. L near feet of frontage along a pub lc thorougnrare project w occupy ts; ft 3 2. Now much natural material 0.e, rock, earth, etc) will be removed from thc s~te? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? (~Yes []No []N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~]Yes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? J~Yes 0 tons/cub~c yards ONo Landscaping/Turf 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0.21t acres. Add reg. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? & Buffer months, (~ncluding demolition) .,9~0~ year,(including demolition). ~year. (pool) Dep. on eco conditions ~No OYes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction N/A 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 2 (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 12 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase [2 month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes IZtNo 20+ 10+ 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project . 0 · 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes ~No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [3Yes E~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? []JYes rqNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain Private Sanitary OYes E"INo 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? C:]Yes 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~Yes ONo a. If yes, what is the amount per month 6.27 tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~Yes ONo Southold c. If yes, give name ; location d. ~gNo Cutchogue Will any wastes not 8o into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes If Yes, explain JgNo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes ~]No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposaB' . tons/month. b. If yes. what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? I-lYes F~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? [Yes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? gqye$ I-INo If yes, indicate type(s) electricity, fuel oil and/or natural gas 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 5169 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes ~No If Yes. explain i'~No 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date C~ty. Town, Village Board ~)Yes ~No City, Town. Village Planning Board f]~lyes I~No City, Town Zoning Board [~Yes [~No City, County Health Department ayes ~No Other Local Agencies []]Yes DNo Other Regional Agencies OYes DNo State Age~cies OYes ONo Federal Agencies [])Yes ONo site plan 2001 variance 2001 sanitary approved '98 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ~Yes DNo If Yes, indicate decision required: I-lzoning amendment Ikr]zoning variance .r-lspecial use permit I-Isubdivision I~site plan Onew/revision of master plan I-Iresource management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? Commercial and residential uses in LB. Maximum buildin~ area is 20% of lot area " which yields a 13,z33 ~ bu~l~ng area 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? N/A 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? IglYes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a % mile radius of proposed action? Recreational Commercial (golf/rest.) Residential, .R-80, R-40 ONo 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a M mile? :[]LYes I-INo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land~ how many lots are proposed~ N/A N/A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~ 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? r~Yes r'lNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~'iYes [:]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes [:]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? 0-1Yes CINo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ~-'---'~ Patricia C. Moore Applicant/Spons~,~lqa~o_e /', ~ Date ... . /' ~ ~"~'~/~_~ -~ Attorney ~gnacure (~_._~Z~' ""~/ ,~ '~ Title If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Asse~ment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question. Have my responses and determinat~ons been reasonable~I The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showin§ types of impact~ and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3 · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question · The number of examples per question does not md[cate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cum[ative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there wilt be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily slgnillcant. Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate Impact, also cheek the Yes box In column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ON• [] O OYes •No O [] OYes [~No [] [] []Yes []No O [] OYes ONo [] O []Yes [] [] I--JYes ONo 0 O OYes ON• IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t? the project site;~ ON• E]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved psrking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on [and where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing 8round surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than '1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year, · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts :2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)I-'IN• I-lYES · Specific land forms: 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) E3NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? [-1NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ DNO I-lyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ r'lNO nYES Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 I 3 Small to PotentialI Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] i-lYes [-]No [] [] r-lyes I-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I"-I No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] i'-~Yes r-INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-'lYes []No [] [] i-lyes []No [] [] I-lYes I-INo r-I [] []Yes •No ~1 [] []Yes l'-JNo I'-I [] []Yes •No [] [] DYes UNo [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] OYes ONo · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatib[e with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR ?. Will proposed action affect air quality? E3NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wi[[ induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour, · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour, · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? f"J NO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Applica{ion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts:. 9. Will Proposed Action substantiaUy affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? I-INO i-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ~]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 2 3~ Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes [~]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes E]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~NO · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures le.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ON• i-lYES (If necessary, use the Visual FAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importanceS' mN• RYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities~' E~mples that would apply to column 2 C]NO ByES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: 9 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact E Moderate Large Mitigated B~ Impact Impact Project Chain, [] [] []Yes [~N [] [] []Yes FiN, [] [] OYes E]N, [] [] OYes ON. [] ~ ~Yes ~N, ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ DYes DN ~ ~ ~Yes ~N ~ ~ ~Yes ~N 14 IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or umque character Istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) estabhshed pursuant to subd~ws~on 6 NYCRR 617 14(g) ~ [~NC) []Xr~S List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation ol the CEA Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate w~thin the CEA? · Proposed Action will result m a reduction m the quant,ty o[ the resource) · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use. function or enloyment of the resource~ · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems~ · E]NO fnYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Will proposed achon affect the community's sources of [uel or energy supply? [~NO E3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in th~ use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] ~ EEyes [] [] [~Yes [] [] []Yes ~] [] [~Yes [] [] F~Yes ~ E~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Ves ~ ~ ~Ves Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Prolect Change I~No []No E~No EJNo E}No ~}No E~No E]No 10 NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [~NO [=]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed ^etlon will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~NO Q-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, hiBhly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARA(~TER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action af fact the character of the existing community~' [~NO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than S%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for futura'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes [:]No [] I--J [~Yes ~No [] [] [:]Yes (:]No ' D [] [~Yes [:]No [] [] I-lyes i-'lNg ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~N0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ DYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes DNo ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts~' ring Q-lYES If uny action In Part 2 Is Identified as a potential large Impact or If you cannot determine tho magnitude o! Impact, proceed to Part $ 11 Part 3--EVA,_JATION OF THE IMPORTAt_ .E OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be control[ed · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 617.20 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ! ] of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the Hational or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-V4 I/4 - V2 V2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] · The State Forest Preserve? [] [] [] [] [] · Hational Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? [] [] [] [] [] · Hational Hatural Landmarks and other outstanding I-1 []' [] [] [] natural features? · Hational Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as Hatlonal or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated Interstate or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? · County road~ · State? · Local road~ [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] 0 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] 0 [] [] O 0 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other [] Yes [] Ho 3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? O~es OHo DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which geaeral[y describe the environment. surrounding Within '1/4 mile * ! mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential ~ ~ Industrial [] ~ Commercial [] ~iJ Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Flat [] [] Hilly [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V~ mile [~Yes [-]No * 1 miles E~Yes F'~No '2 miles F-lYes []No '3 miles E]Yes []No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance, Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work [] [] [] [] Involved in recreational activities [] [] [] [] Routine travel by residents [] [] [] [] At a residence [] [] [] [] At workslte [] [] [] [] Other _ [] [] [] [] 14-164 (WgS)--Text 12 ' I PROJECTI.D. NUMEER 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Munlclpillty County 4. PRECISE LOCATION (Street address and ~'oad Inierse<-'tlona, prominent landmarks, etc., or provide map) 5. I$ PROPOSED ACTION: [] New [] Expansion [] Mod[llcatlon/alterstlon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially sores Ultimately acres SEQR 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLy WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LANe USE RESTRICTIONS? [] Yes [] No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRE~ENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? C] ReMdantlal I--] Imlustdal [] C~mmemlal [] Agriculture "10. CEE8 A~TION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, re'ATE OR LOCAL)I, ~] Yes [] No if yes, list agencl~a) and permlt/approv&ls 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE AC/1ON HAVE A CURREHTt.Y VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? [] Yes I'-I No If ye~. list Igen~/name and pen'Nt/&pprowl 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MOOIFICATION? I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Slgeatum: If the ,,etlon Is In the Coastal Ares, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before prcoeedlng with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL AS,~ ~MENT iTo be completed Dy Agency} C COULD ACTION RESULT iN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may De hanowrdlen. ,I legible) Cl. Existing air qualdy, surlace or groundwater quality or quanllty, noise leveJs, ex~stmg potenhal for e~osion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain brmfly C5. Growth, subsequen[ development, or related activilies likely to be induced by the proposed acbon'~ Explain briefly C6. Long term, short term, cumulalive, or olher effecls nol identified in C1-C57 Explain briefly C7. Other impacts (including cha,lges in use of either quantily or type of energy)? Explain briefly. O. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [] No II Yes, explain briefly PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Idenllfied above, determine whether it is subslanlial, large, impo~lant or olherwise signilicant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability ol Occurring; (c) duralion; id) irraversiblllty; (e) geogrsphiD SCOpe; and (f) magnitude. If neoessa~y, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail lo show that all relevant adverse impacts have been h:lentifted and adequalely addressed. I! question D of Part II was checked yes, the determination and significance must evaluate the potential Impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, baBed on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: SUPERVISORS OFFICE TOW'N OF SOUTHOLD PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NewYork 11971 ... Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 11 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERED Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Hellenic Snack Bar Dear Sir or Madam: In connection with the above referenced matter, enclosed please find the Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form. PCM/mm Enclosure Ve r y../~?-~.~ yours, , _.- '>j:vl'~- . (--~.~-~.¥L c. ~oor~ MAR 1 1 2002 Southold Town Planning Board March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLENIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Lomz FAF. Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to larimary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District include the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Alignment & Dimensional Plan (Sheet 1 of 3) last dated August 8, 2001 indicates the following dimensions: Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Variance Reauired Units 1 & 2 N.A. 15.00' N.A. Side Yard Units 3 & 4 N.A. N.A. 20.42' Rear Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. N.A. 41.05' Rear Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A, 20.42' Rear Yard Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 26.00' Side & Rear Yard Units 11 & 12 N.A. 1S.00' N.A. Side Yard Side & Rear Pool N.A. 15.94' 26.01' Yard Page 2 March 7, 2002 Description of Existimz and Proposed Site Use, etc. Existin~ Site Use, etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for 5 of the 17 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 1S feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, I residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. Prooosed Site Use. etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 12 unit hotel complex. The proposed structures include retaining the existing restaurant, 12 new hotel units in 6 buildings, pool and spa. The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the hotel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 15 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 3,930 gpd. (12 units @ 1 S0 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 4,367 gpd. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. Page 3 March 7, 2002 A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 17, 2001). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. SUFFOLK COI [NTY CENTEI~ [~I\tFRI.IEAD. NEW YORK 1190[ (031) 852-2100 NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - COMMERCIAL //¢o/ Your submission for the referenced project has been further review and/or approval: NOTICE GMZ SCTM O: reviewed. This office will require the following for Completed Application WWM-004 Processing Fee $ SEQRA Determination Wetlands Permit or Waiver - NYSDEC / Town Town / Village Zoning Letter Restrictive Covenants for: ~::{,SPDES Application Form Well Water Analysis Public Water ! S:'.v::' Availability Letter Engineering Report Article 6 (Subdivision) Approval Water Quality Approval Pollution Control Approval SCDPW Approval Review Board Determination P.E. / R.A. Certification of Existing Sanitary System Certificate of Authorization or Disclaimer INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR Suffolk County Tax Map Number Metes and Bounds Description Lot Size [ ] Key IV[ap Distance to Cross Street Location, Date, & Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes >'~,,Floor Plans Gross Floor Area of Building(s) All Surface Waters Within 300 ft. Topographical Contours (5 ft. interval) Neighboring Wells and Sewage Systems Within 150' Of Property (or specify that there are none) Signature & Seal of Design Professional 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval CORRECTIONS REQUIRED ON PLANS I Storm Drainage Structure Locations ] Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge ] Sewage Disposo. I Design Calculations J Location of Sewage System ] Profile / Details of Sewage System j Sewage System Invert Elevations ] Expansion Area for Leaching Pools ] Water / Sewer Service Line Locatiom. s~ I Private Well Details and Location 1 Profile / Details / Location of Water Supply System } Ex sting Build!rig, Sewage / Water System Location{s) ] [ } Project does not conform to Department standards. See enclosed / previously sent Notice of Non-Conformance. PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUB*IISSION~S~ Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Date: 08/01/03 Transaction(s): Application Fees Receipt#: 0 Subtotal $972.00 Cash#: 109 Total Paid: $972.00 Name: ClerklD: Giannaris, John & Anna P.o. Box 506 East Marion, NY 11939 JOYCEW Internal iD: g0318 Date: 08/01/03 Transaction(s): Seqra Review Check#: 109 Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 SouthoJd, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT * * * Receipt#: Total Paid: 0 Subtotal $1,383.75 $11383.75 Name: ClerklD: Giannaris, John& Anna P.o. Box 506 East Marion, NY 11939 JOYCEW Internal ID: 80319 SITE PLAN TYPE: AMENDED NEW Wi~-IDRAWN INCOMPLETE PROJECT NAME: /¢~,,¢ ~. ~/~',~ c.,,~ ZONEI:~ ZONE2: LOCATION: //~.. ~.,.~ .~r~q . HAMLET: [PROJECT USE: SCTM#1000- - - ~,4~,,'[E: · ~ //~,~ - ,2_3~ TEL# (~'"~') ~ -.~.-'~,~ [AGENT NA~: ~ ~/,~ ,-t,- ~/,'~'~-~,~ TEL# ( . ) -__ IPROJECT DESCRIPTION I THE _~..~ ZONE LOCATED AT IN ~ SCTM# 1000- - - ( SEE ABOVE). BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE: S/P REQUlRED Y OR N ZBA APPEAL REQUIRE(Y~OR N PRE-SUBMISSION WRt l'l t~N REQUEST: PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE (WITHIN 30 DAYS OF WRITTEN REQUES,T) INFORMAL REQUEST FOR REVISIONS: PRE-WORK SESSION: APPLICATION RECEIVED DATE: ~'~ /,~/ ~, APPLICATION PROCESS DATE: PAYMENT RECEIVED: AMOUNT RECEIVED:$ FEE AMOUNT: ($300.X --$ SF=$ (WITHIN 10 DAYS OF RECEIPT), CWITHIN 30 DAYS OF REVIEW) ACRES pARCEL IN ., STI~T~.>$T~SCDH$~NYSDEC__,USACORPS ,NYSDO~, SCWA__, SC?D~ SCDPW__ LEAD AGENCY: ros,~s: ACTION TY~E: ~;OORDINATED: UNCOORDINATED:~' (TYPE1: TYPE2: UNLISTED~ -;QRA DETERMINATION :NEG DE~i .t._R("/~ N, ~ -~ t-''~.-~ ~,PPROVAL$ REQUIRED: REFERRED DATE NOTES APPROVAL DATE NOTES BUILDING DEPARTMENT CERTIFI~TION: ~>~ ~/~/~ ; , . I~l~l~ ~ ~ ~ TOWN ENGINEER APPROV~: ~/ )/~ ~ ~1~1~ ~1~1~ ~'/~ ~UFFO~ COUN~ DEP~TMENT OF P~NNING: I~1 ~/~, I ~_ SUFFOLK OOUN~ BERT OF H~TH: PERMIT ~:~ ~1~1~ ~ ZONING BO~D OF ~P~S; ~P~ / / ~/~/ R~ BO~D OF TRUSTEE'S: ~/ / ~ NYS DEC WE~ND~IDA~SPDES / / ~ / / f ENDORSEMENT OF SITE PLAN: FIELD INSPECTION FOR C/O: DISTRIBUTE APPROVED SITE PLANS TO: BUILDING DEPT / TOWNENG / / GENERAL NOTES: 8125/2004 ' SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .S~ptember 6.2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall at 4:00 p.m. Members present'we(e Architect Glynis Berry, Co-Chairmen Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith, James Grathwohl of the Historic Preservation Commission as Well as Nicholas J. Planamento, Howard Meinke and Ronald McGreevy. , Also present were Thomas .Wickham of the Town'.Board, Victor L'Eplattenier and Bruno Semon of the Ptar~ning Board st;afl, as well as George Giannaris and Witliam'Gorman for Hellenic Snack Bar IX Io,.'cd by Howard Meitik¢ and ~¢conded by Sanford Hanaucr, il- ~,,'a,~ RESOI ,VED ~,~ APPROVE thc MINUTES of the meeting of ,August 18, 2005. \ o1,.. ol th~. ~. ormmllc~ A?cs AIl. fIEI_,I.ENIC SNACK IlAR fRoute 25 - East Marion) SCTM~ 1000~35-2-14 After reviewing revised drawings and elevations, it was P. ESOLVI';1) by H,~,ward IXleinkc and seconded by 5~:~dbrd Hanauer lo ,&PPROVI~2 thc application .~s suhmhted Vote of,he Cotmni~¢c: k)'cq All. A!)plic:mts arc reminded f, hal deviatiot~s iiom approved drawhig>, without ami approval of ibc ..M-chitectural Rcx~ew Colmnit/e¢ will cause r¢,z~sqon ot cn'ig~nal :lpproval and ma.,, negatively hnpac[ upon securing the Certificalc pi- IL\RBES WINERY ( Sound Avenue al Hallock Avenue- Laurel) SCI After reviewing plans for a winew arid for a sales and rasing budding. moxcd by James Grathwol~ and seconded by Ron McGrcexT Io express an cnlhu,,iasli, I';NDORSEMI:2NT of lilt CONCEPT and to TABI.E lhe APPLI('ATION :l~x Jhmi, s:x'cral of I1~¢ items on thc .kRC chccklJsL including siding material and colon, trim and ~olor, &tail of thc pct'gcfla and material of lhe posls, Iocalion of roof vznt,. and shielding ol healing and c(}ohng urdls and waslc conla~er, localion o[~lhc hghling with catalogue cuts, silage and spot ~lex'ations of thc bu~dings. X'olc of'thtt ('~munillcc: hx'cs .~11. The C~,nmittcc sus_,gestq to thc Plannin~ B~)ard Ih~at thc spill Lfil lcncc al(m,_, :;;,:,urid .'~x'enu¢- h¢ used Ic~ define th,: entrances io ll~c Farm Stand and Ihe renovated buiklmS,,s. Rob,:l t Ix. cdh ~RM 33m ST~"" OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSI~ rATlOh HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NON-UTILITY WORK PREPARE 3 COPIES (photocopies a~oeptable) hereby mede for a highway work permit: For Joint application, name and address of Second Applicant below: Name State ~F DEPOSIT/BOND TO: IC,~m State Zip 1. Estimated cost of work being perlormed In state highway light-of-way $ ~j~ 2. Anflcip~tad duration of work: From ~/~ I~'/"'?-.~,hru ~u'/'M~ l'01'~ ,'I~*'-~ - ', to eppty to the opem, tlon(s)checkedeethemvemeside. S. P=tacliveLtabJll~lnsur,~cecoveredbyPollcyNo. ~J~ ,'~ ~ ~ Z'~'-~ 3<~ ;exp[reson *~-~k.lf~ I~rl'~ .~ 4. A $20.00 fee will be cha~ged for checks returned by the bank. A'ri'ACHED: Ptans X Specifications LOCATION: State Route State Highway SEQR ~QUIREMENTS: (Check appropriate item) Exempt Ministerial Type EtS or DEIS Lead Agency U project is ihentilied to be mlnistertal, exempt. ~r TYPE I[, no further action is required. If project is determined to be other than ministe~al, exempt. ~r TYPE II, refer to M.A.P.7.12-2 Acceptance of the request rmil su ~ p~em'~ittee ta~the restrictions, n ~econd App~cant Signature Date S- FOR+~GH.WAY WQI~K pERMiTS. PERM 42 (2/05) Permit Fee: Insurance Fee: Total Received: Check or M.(~s~IO.: II ~ '~f NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANS *Permittee: HELLEDZC CABZNS G DRA~ BAR, [NC 51A5 RAIN RD. PO BOX ~ E. NARTON, NY 1t939 ~tt: HEONDE DIAiI#ANIS Billing Address: (complete if different from above) FION HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT lO-eS-e2s6 Pe t ND.:10-05- 0256 Project tdentifkT, ation No.: / / Expiration Date: 8386 SH No.: 6,~ Deposit Rec. for $ Check or MO. No.: ! / Dated: Estimated Cost ofl~rk Performed in the State Right-of-Way $ 6992S634 Chargeable to Bond No.: ($ ~.~) or Undertaking on File: Return of Deposit Made Payable to: (complete if different from Permittee) Under the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law, permission is hereby granted to the permittee to: TO RECONSTRUCT AND PERRANTLY NAZDTDZN COflNERCTAL HCCESS AND NEIlOVE AN ACCESS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NYS RTE. 26, BETHE EN aDS tDSe-~.682, AND OTHER KNCZOENT&L HONK DS PER DTTDCHED PLHN$ i SPECS. ALL HONI( SHALL BE TO THE SATKSFACTKON OF RES. ENDKNEER. DLL I~ORI[ SHALL BE DONE [R ACCOIlDANCE #]NTH APPROVED PLANS, HY$ SPECS OR ASODE. NA[NTENANCE & PROTECTZO N OF TRAFFIC SHALL BE THE HESPORSZBKLZTY OF THE PEDNKTTEE AT ALL TKIIES URTKL CONPLETZOH OF ALL POill[ ETC. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. ANYONE WORKING IN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY tS REQUIRED TO WEAR HIGH VISIBILITY APPAREL (ORANGE/YELLOW) AND A HARD HAT. C°un~R:0LK SOOTHOi. H Municipality - 25 Route # - as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the mutes as stated therein, if required; and pursuant to the conditions and regulations general or special, and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit. Date~ll'~l~UHE, N,Y, Commissioner of Transportation ,wH I0 i~: EBREMG?i~ ~N. ~"HHEA;iP~L~ CwATA~ OWNoARNKDpDo R~Wi~I N~ (AOL~ BCEOPIEAvA~ Ti~LREE OATF)~ ETT sA cDr HE E~U SR~ ~(~EN ;~~? 0 F'/TI~I~ITRACTO R BEFORE ANY BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS COMPLETION, THE PERMI1TEE ABSOLUTELY MUST NOTIFY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER, I(EVZR HATTHAE[ ].966 COUIlTY ilo 7 ~[VE~IIEAD. NEll YO~ t~O! ! UPON COMPLETION OF'WORK A~THORIZEO, TIlE FOLLOWING WEL"E COIIAPL ETE D,SIG "E O BY THE PERUiTTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed. Refund of deposit or return/release of bond is requested. DATE PERMITTEE AUTHORIZED AGENT {If Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse side of this form must be completed· r3 Refund of Deposit is authorized [3 Return of Bond is authorized r~ Amount charged against Bond may be released [3 Retain Bond for future permits r~ Forfeit of Guarantee Deposit is authorized r~ Other r~ Mailing address of refund has been verified. If different, list new address below. The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box che~ Permit closed Q Bond returned/released r~ Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized ~ Forfeit Guarantee Deposit to NYSDOT ~ Other ._.~-~-: Southol~'~'~ ~'~" DATE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER The issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit at its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permittee will cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto uniti all work under the permit is satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from work performed pumuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. * Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporation, municipality, or state department or agency, and his or Its eucceaaors In Inter.t, shad] be responsible for the maintenance and repair . of ouch work or portion of such work as set forth within the term, and condittbna of the work permlL O ~ -- ~£, Sender: Submission Without a Cover Letter Subject: ~C~-~ ~ ~ SCTM#: 1000 ~ Date: Comments: [] F.x~n~s Ma~I r-I C.O.D. 7004 0750 0000 9909 4587 PS Form 3811, Febma~ 2004 ~ ~ i ~- Receh~d ' ted Name) ~ C, of ff YES, enter dellve~ addm below: C]No 0 [] C.O.D. ~.~ 7004 0750 0000 9909 4617 ps Form 3811, Februa~ ~lle4 Item 4 ~f Re~'~:l De,We~ la de,red. · Pfl~ your name and addrees on the reveme 7004 0750 D. Is del~ addma~ diffemm from Rem 1 ? ?9 Ce~f~ed Mall 0 F~ MeJ~ 0000 9909 4594 · Complete Items 1, 2, and 3. Nso coml:~ete Item 4 If ReMtlcted Delivery Is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the can:l to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, or on the front if space pe~nlts. mo'Name) C. Date of Delive~..~ 3. Sew~e Type I-I Certified Mall [] Expmes Mall [3 Registered E3 Return Receipt fe~' Machandlse i-I Insured Mall [] C.O.D. 4. Restricted DelbeeJ? ~ Fee) I-I yee 2. ~ Nu~_ ~ 7004 0750 0000 9909 4600 PS Form 3811, February 2004 ~ Ream ~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I pemonally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on ~-~ I'Z ! ~-o~ ~ I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on .~ ~ c/$ ~1 ~ r~ ../Sigj:~ture Address Date '/ .~ ........ ~ .... ubli~ " ~ ~/ JOSEPH L. TOWNSEND JR. Notary PubEc, State of New York Qual. Suffotk County No. 9366335 Commission Expires Feb. 28, 20 ~ PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVIT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: noon, Fri., 919/05 Re: Proposed Site Plan: Hellenic Restaurant SCTM#: 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, September 12, 2005, 6:20 p.m. U.S. Postal Service,r, r,- .CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEiPI u~ (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provtdec# ~ .~ ~1~" US. Postal Serwce,. CERTIFIED MAIL.. RECEIPT (Domestic Marl Only. No Insurance Coverage Provided) Postage $ ~IT Ii): U.S. Postal Service,,, CERTIFIED MAIL,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) LIS pos, tJtl CERTIFIED I~AIL,,, RECEIPT I 0"' Postage I $ ~ i~ '~~~.r.._.~ ............... SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 6.2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall at 4:00 p.m. Members present'were Architect Glynis Berry, Co-Chairmen Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith, James Grathwohl of the Historic Preservation Commission as Well'as Nicholas J. Planamento, Howard Meinke and Ronald McGreevy. Also present were Thomas Wickham of the Town .Board, Victor L'Eplattenier and Bruno Semon of the Planning Board st;afl, as well as George Giannaris and William Gorman for Hellenic Snack Bar Moved bv Howard Nl¢inke anti seconded bx S;mford Hanaucr. il ~as 14ESOI.VI,:I) Io .&I~PROVE h6 Ml~t 'I'ES ~l'lh~ m~ehn~, oJ Au~us~ 18, 2 )'~ }II,:I.][.ENIC SNACK BAR iRoute 25 - East Marion) SCTM~ 1000-35-2-t4 Afl. er rcviexving l'e'~ised drawings and elevations, it ~xas RESOI.VE1) by .t,, [cinkc and sc:onded b:' Smttbrd [{anauer to APPROVE thc applic;~tion ds ,:ubmiucd Vote of'the Cotmmttee: .\x es .'all. Apt)licants arc reminded that d¢,Aations ti'om approx, ed drawim? ~,,ilhoul thc rcvic,~, and apl)J'oval t~t' Iht ..krclfitecmral Re\Sew Committee w~l cause ]otis,ion o t d~¢ oHenal d!)proxid and m:~y ~lc~ativcly intpd~t upon seeming Iht Ccrtili~alc ol x )Ccttpdn~ I I..\RBES \:VINEI~,Y { Sound Avenue al Hallock Avenue- Lam'el3 ?;C'l'Nlvli)tlh-lOd-j_-7 :\Iici' reviewing plans for a winery and ibr a ,talcs and tasting buLIdin~, il mo~ ed bx .lames (h'athwoh] and seconded by Ron Ix I,:Grcex5 to cxprc,,~ an I.;NI)ORSI~MI.;NT ul thc ('ONCI.]F"I .md t~ I'AIII.I,i the AF'tq.I('.\ I'IC, N s,zx'chd oI thc items on tit,: ..'d:,.G chccklisl, including siding mat,.:rial and cok.~ trim ;tnt! color, detail of thc pergola and material of the posts, localion of ~oot vents. and shielding o{ heating and cooing unils and waste contaber, location of thc hghting skith c.~talogue cuts. silage and spot elevations of thc buildings. X otc of thc ('mmni~cc: Ax'cs .~1. Thc C~)mmitt¢c suggests to thc Planning Board that thc split tail fence along cnt~c b,z us~:d to define tile entrances to the Farm Stand and thu renovated buildin..:,s. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER~ JER[LYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM ,J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H~ $IDOR GEORGE D~ SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 543715 State Route 25 ~'eor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Town of Southold Planning Board From: Mark Terry, Senior Environmental Planner LWRP Coordinator Date: September 1, 2005 Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Snack Bar Located at 5145 New York State Road 25 (Main Road) SCTM #1000-3542-14 & 15.1 Zone: LB and R-80 This amended site plan is for a proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519- acre p~.~ ~e LB Zone located approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with the Policy Standards and therefore is ~ CONSISTENT with the LWRP. Please advise the applicant of the following recommendations to further Policy 8. Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. Policy 8 could be further supported by the following solid xvaste management initiatives which would include: 1. The use of the Town of Southold Compost Facility materials which contribute to the replenishment of organic matter in local soils and help reduce the reliance of chemical fertilizers and herbicides and minimize the reduction of chemical fertilizers and herbicides in the Town's ground and surface waters. 2. Participating in the Town of Southold's STOP program. Pursuant to Chapter 95, the Planning Board shall consider this reconunendation in preparing its written determination regarding the consistency of the proposed action. Please contact me at (631) 765-1938 if you have any questions regarding the above. Cc: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer JOSHUA Y. HORTONSUPERVISOR JAMES A GRIi CEHRTER' TOWN HALL - 53095 MAIN ROAD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971 Fax. (631) -765 -9015 Tel. (631) -765 - 1560 OFFICE OF THE ENGINEER TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Jedlyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson - Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: HELLENIC RESTAURANT Route 25, East Marion, N.Y. SCTM #: 1000-35-02-14 Dear Mrs. Woodhouse: August 30, 2005 As per a request from your office, I have reviewed the site plan for the above~ef~_~-~ [ed project. This site plan has a revision date of 2/10/05 and has been prepared by the office of Young and Young. Please consider the following: Drainage calculations have been provided for all site improvement and/or hardened surfaces. The drainage design, as proposed, meets the minimum requirements of Town Code. I have reviewed the correspondence from the NYS DOT but I have not received a copy of the Curb Cut Permit or related drawings. Please forward a copy for my records and use during the Construction / Inspection Phase of the Project. The Asphalt Pavement located at the eastem most entrance will be removed as per the NYS DOT. Once this access to the site is closed, there may still be a visual perception that this entrance still exists. The Planning Board should consider the placement of additional landscaping or other such means to remove any uncertainty. Please note that the proposed disturbance resulting from construction activities and grading of this site will be greater than one (1) acre in area. This project will require coverage from NYS Department of Environmental Protection (DEC) under the Phase II State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Program. The Developer must obtain coverage under the General Permit for Storm-water Runoff from Construction Activity (GP-02-01) pdor to the initiation of construction activities. If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact my office. · rely, , Richt;r,R.A?~ Cotmty Tax Map Number 1000- 102-4.26~2 & 7.1 ' 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Catapaao Dairsd Farm, located on tho n/sdo County Road 48 apprgximately 360'.e/o Mill . Road.-48 in ~c, own Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 74-2-12.2 6:15 p.m. Proposed site plan for North Fork 'industrial Park COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STATE OF NEW YORK ss: Nancy M. Mclaughlin, being duly swom, says that she is the Legal Advertising Coordinator, of the Traveler Watchman, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in said Traveler Watchman once each week for ..... /. ..... week(s) successively, commencing on ,the ........ ./. ....... day of ....... .... ,2005. ' Sworn to before me this...../....day of ...... 200s. (Foster), loca~l at the ge inter: -. section of Commerce Drive and Corporate Drive, known as 350 Nolt~g~ Commerce Drive in Cutehogue, .._>,.~.~.,....:..~...~.,r.v~--~..~,.~. ....... Town of Sunthold, County of ~ Notary Public NOTICE IS HEREBY GtV~N Suffolk, S~te- of .New York. ~ pmmmat to S6ction 276of Suffolh County Tax Map Number tt~ Town~/aw ~ad-2,rfiele X37q l~.-I.5 .¥ · - og the ~Co~ :of ~e Town. of 6"20 p./a.' !~Ol~a~l~nmended E~ly mare Southold, a lsublic l~u-ing will be site t~hlt t~r ~e Re~n,,nmt, NOTARY PUBLIC, Stat, of New York h~ld by lhe Sou~old Town ~a- ~..~.~....'~.. q~o, .;,~_ No. 01HA~0~9984 pl~at-the~r6,~ m,.,. ~)-f-~i~a~ci-~l~ 0~1 -t~ I~VO Qualified ia Suffolk Co*nary Main Road, Southold, New York NYS Ri~ad 25 in East Marion, Commission expire~ May 06, 2006 un the 12~h day of September, Town of Southol.d, County of 20~ on tbe question or the roi- Suffolk, Stato of N~w.. York. 61~..' !l~m. Proposed Standard 1000-35-244& Stq~mie Chamews, located on the w/s/o Youags Avq~.ue md.then/s/o~.Vknv Avgntm, 1,669 e/s/o Hortun l~e, ~ly f~ ea~'~ ~ It3ad ~ 375' so~. of CR 48, Sou&old, Say, hold, ~oV~ii~.,~'- S6u~hold, Town of.i~old, ~C~_un~ of Cotlaty oi~gl~ffoi~g S~at~o~New I000- 63rt'O.3 . ~': 8/30~05 ' ' 6:05 p.m. Proposed minor sub-- BY ORDER OF THE division for Michael Kaloski, SoI~rI-IOLD TOWIq PLAN- · lo~ated on Ah~ahs Lane, 2,056 f~et north of Main Road 0x[YS 25) and south of htdddle Rbad ' (CR 48) in Cutchogue~ Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk N-lNG BOARD JorilyaB. Woodhouse 1X 9/1/05 (070) PLANNING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 12th day of September, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Daniel & Stephanie Charnews, located on the w/s/o Youngs Avenue and the e/s/o Horton Lane, approximately 375' south of CR 48, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 63-1-25 6:05 p.m. Proposed minor subdivision for Michael Kaloski, located on Alvahs Lane, 2,056 feet north of Main Road (NYS 25) and south of Middle Road (CR 48) in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-102-4-6.2 & 7.1 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Catapano Dairy Farm, located on the n/s/o County Road 48 approximately 360' e/o Mill Road, known as 33705 County Road 48 in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-74-2-12.2 6:15 p.m. Proposed site plan for North Fork Industrial Park (Foster), located at the s/e intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Drive, known as 350 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-1.5 6:20 p.m. Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Restaurant, located approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dated: 8/30/05 August 30, 2005 Legal Notice Page Two 6:25 p.m. Proposed set off for Edward Booth, located on the n/s/o Sound View Avenue, 1,669 feet east of Lighthouse Road in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-50-2-15 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson PLEASE PRINT ONCE ON THURSDAY, September 1, 2005 AND FORWARD ONE (1) AFFIDAVIT TO THIS OFFICE. THANK YOU. COPY SENT TO: The Traveler/~Vatchman STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) LINDA RANDOLPH, Secretary to the Planning Board of the Town of Southold, New York, being duly sworn, says that on the 30th day of August, 2005 she affixed a notice of which the annexed printed notice is a true copy, in a proper and substantial manner, in a most public place in the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, to wit: Town Clerk's Bulletin Board, Southold Town Hall~ 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 9/12/05 Regular Meeting: 6:00 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed standard subdivision for Daniel & Stephanie Charnews - SCTM#1000-63-1-25 6:05 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed minor subdivision for Michael Kaloski - SCTM#1000-102-4-6.2 & 7.1 6:10 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for Catapano Dairy Farm - SCTM#1000-74-2-12.2 6:15 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed site plan for North Fork Industrial Park (Foster) - SCTM#1000-96-1-1.5 6:20 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Restaurant - SCTM#1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 6:25 p.m. Public Hearing for the proposed set off for Edward Booth - SCTM# 1000-50- 2-15 Linda Randolph Secretary, Southold Town Planning Board Sworn to before me this '~bi-'Lclay of ~k"b~C0A~ %~ , 2005. Notary Public MELANE DOROSK1 NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yo~ No. 01D04634870 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Excites September 30,,~ Page I ofl Randolph, Linda From: Dina Kontokosta [dkontokosta@travelerwatchman,com] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:32 AM To: Randolph, Linda Subject: Re: Legal ad for publication It will mn this week. ..... Original Message ..... From: _Ra_ndo!p_h.J.inda To: d ko qtQ~o sta@?ave!e_r~:v~tch m_a.~..~com Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:23 AM Subject: Legal ad for publication Dina, : Please print the attached ad in the September 1 edition, and send confirmation of receipt as soon as possible, Thanks, Linda 8/30/05 PI~NINING BOARD MEMBE~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING .M)DRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NrY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 ~cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, bpi' Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, pursuant to Section 276 of the Town Law and Article XXV of the Code of the Town of Southold, a public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Planning Board, at the Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York on the 12th day of September, 2005 on the question of the following: 6:00 p.m. Proposed Standard Subdivision for Daniel & Stephanie Charnews, located on the w/s/o Youngs Avenue and the e/s/o Horton Lane, approximately 375' south of CR 48, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000- 63-1-25 6:05 p.m. Proposed minor subdivision for Michael Kaloski, located on Alvahs Lane, 2,056 feet north of Main Road (NYS 25) and south of Middle Road (CR 48) in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-102-4-6.2 & 7.1 6:10 p.m. Proposed site plan for Catapano Dairy Farm, located on the n/s/o County Road 48 approximately 360' e/o Mill Road, known as 33705 County Road 48 in Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-74-2-12.2 6:15 p.m. Proposed site plan for North Fork Industrial Park (Foster), located at the s/e intersection of Commerce Drive and Corporate Drive, known as 350 Commerce Drive in Cutchogue, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-96-1-1.5 6:20 p.m. Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Restaurant, located approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the n/s/o NYS Road 25 in East Marion, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dated: 8/30/05 August 30, 2005 Legal Notice Page Two $:25 p.m. Proposed set off for Edward Booth, located on the n/s/o Sound View Avenue, '1,669 feet east of Lighthouse Road in Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, State of New York. Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-50-2-15 BY ORDER OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairperson 5145 Main Rd. E.Marion, NY 11939-0506 (631) 477-0138 August 23, 2005 Dear Members of the Planning Board, This letter is to confirm our intent to provide proper handicapped access from the handicapped parking spots in the rear of the restaurant to the North entrance of the pavilion in accordance with the recommendations discussed in the planning board workshop meeting on August 22, of 2005. This would provide much easier access to the restaurant for our customers with a disability. ly, Project Manager. (631 ) 477-0138 (Work) (631) 806-5750 (Cell) PERM 33m (1/97) ST/~ OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSf rATIO~ HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NON-UTILITY WORK PREPARE 3 COPIES (photocopies acceptable) Appiicatlo~ ia hereby made for a highway wofl~ peffnlt: For Jolm application, name ~nd addreaa of Second Applicant below: Name c~ state z~ RETURN OF DEPOSIT/BOND TO: (c, ompm~ =a~y ~ ~m mmitm) Name stye 1. Estimated cost of work being pedormed in state highway fight-of-way 4. ^ $20.00 lee will be charged for checks ~etumad by the bank. PROPOSED WORK (Brief desadption): ~'(~ &~--~ TO ¢C /~I)/~J~D ~,~0 ~-' ~'-~I'~-~'~-/'L~.~ ~ rv~/c~'¢~l./ A'rrACHED: plans ~ Specifications LOCATION: State Route State Highway SEQR ~..QUIREMENTS: (Check appropriate item) and Retarence Marker ElS or DEI$ Lead Agency I! p~ojec~ is identified to be ministerial, exempt, or TYPE Il, ~o further ~ction is required. If project is deten'nlned to be other than ministerial, exempt, or TYPE II, refer to M.A.P.7.12-2, Appendix A S EQI~.E~.$ FOR+~HWAY'fl/'~ORK PERMIT~. · . . ;' ~ ,~ · L~ PERM 42 (2/05) Permit Fee: Insurance Fee: Total Received: 35~,66 Check or M.~05~o.: II *Permittee: HELLEItIC CABINS i SNACK BAR, IHC 6145 ItAIIt RD. PO BOX 6~6 E, HARION, NY 22939 att: GEORGE GIMIFlRRIS Billing Address: (complete if differentfromebove) NEW YORK DEPARTMENT Of TRANSPOI~'ION HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT 19-66-6256 Permit No.:l 0-05- 0256 Project Identification No.: ! ! Expiration Date: 8366 SH No.: 6.66 Deposit Rec. for $ Check or MO. No.: ! ! Dated: Estimated Cost ofl~rk Pen~ormed in the State Right-of-Way $ 69925634 Chargeable to Bond No.: ($ 566~.66) or Undertaking on File: Return of Deposit Made Payable to: (complete if different from Permittee) Under the provisions of the Highway Law or Vehicle & Traffic Law, permission is hereby granted to the permittee to: TO ItECOitSTitUCT AND PERIlANTLY IlRINTAEN CONitEitCZAL ACCESS AND RENOVE Rit RCCES$ ON THE ItORTH SIDE Of NYS RTE. 25, BETWE EN NAS 1686-1682, AND OTHER INCIOEItTAL WOItK AS PER ATTACHEO PLAITS & SPECS, ALL WORK SHALL BE TO THE SRTISFACTIOIt OF RES. [KGENEER. ALL WORIt SHRLL 8E OONE Eft ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVEO PLAITS, ItYS SPECS OiL R$OBE. ItREItTENAItCE 6 PROTECTZO fl OF TRAFFIC SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERFlITTEE AT ALL TIRES UNTIL CONPLETIOFl OF ALL WORK ETC. THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC. ANYONE WORKING IN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY IS REQUIRED TO WEAR HIGH VISIBILITY APPAREL (ORANGE/YELLOW) AND A HARD HAT. C°un~c~OLR SOUTHOL0 Municipality- 25 Route #- as set forth and represented in the attached application at the particular location or area, or over the routes as stated therein, if required; and pursuant to the conditions and regulations general or special, and methods of performing work, if any; all of which are set forth in the application and form of this permit· BEFORE WORK IS STARTED AND UPON ITS COMPLETION, THE PERMITTEE ABSOLUTELY MUST HOTI~ THE RESIDENT ENBINEER, [EVil IATTHAE[ [9~ COUNTY ~0 t58 7~31 ~O. NE~ YOR[ 1~1 1 U~N COMPLETION ~ ~ ~'~ ~OTHOR~ED, THE FOLLOWING ~E~L~EO, SrGNED BY THE PERMITTEE AND DELIVERED TO THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. Work authorized by this permit has been completed· Refund of deposit or return/release of bond is requested. DATE PERMI~'EE AUTHORIZED AGENT (If Any) Work authorized by this permit has been satisfactorily completed and is accepted. Reverse aide of this form muat be completed, Refund of Deposit is authorized Return of Bond is authorized Amount charged against Bond may be released Retain Bond for future permits Forfeit of Guarantee Deposit is authorized Other [3 Mailing address of refund has been verified. If different, list new address below. DATE RESIDENT ENGINEER The Regional Office will forward this form to the Main Office with the appropriate box chec~P~ed. \ ~ r~ Permit closed [3 Bond returned/released Refund of Guarantee Deposit on this permit is authorized Forfeit Guarantee Deposit to NYSDOT Other DATE REGIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEER The issuing authority reserves the right to suspend or revoke this permit at its discretion without a hearing or the necessity of showing cause, either before or during the operations authorized. The Permittee will cause an approved copy of the application to be and remain attached hereto unitl all work under the permit is satisfactorily completed, in accordance with the terms of the attached application. All damaged or disturbed areas resulting from work performed pursuant to this permit will be repaired to the satisfaction of the Department of Transportation. * Upon completion of the work within the state highway right-of-way authorized by the work permit, the person, firm, corporation, municipality, or state department or agency, and his or its successors in interest, shall be responsible for the maintenance and repair of such work or portion of such work as set forth within the terms and conditlbna of the work permit. PERM 4f-rd REVERSE b. Boring, Jacking, and Tunnuling Methods a) All the requirements of 8.1. a. f.) DESIGN a) through fi shall apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Oepartmerl! of Transportationn, Manual of Uniform Traffic Contrul Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) Ag the requirements of B. 1. a. 1.) CONSTRUCTION shall apply. C. SUGBASE, PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER REQUIREMENTS {including manholeul 1. Subbase a. The subbase course shall be a minimum of 12 inches thick unless otherwise approved. The material shag meet the requirements of current Department ef Transportation subbase course item as spacJfied by the Regional Soils Engineer. b. Under the permit, corksttuction which adve's~y affects the subsurface drainage of the pavement structure shah be CmTeCtad by the addition of sudace or subsurface drains, as required. 2. Pavement and Shoulders a. Pmmanent The replaced pavement shall be similar to the existing pavement in composition and texture. The seJecrlon of the material type and compoaiton shaft be subject to the approvul of the Regional Director or his representative. The limit of pavement replacement shall be such that the replaced pavement ia supported by thoroughly compacted subbase material and the pavement is restored to the proper grade, cross-slope and smoothness. Composition of Bituminous Plent Mixtures in Section 401 of the New York State Department of Transportation's Specification, including eddenda. The mixture shall be Mixtures in Section 501 of the New York State Department of TransporTaUon's Specifications, including addenda. Class F is a high early strength mixture and should be used when early opening to traffic is desired. The concrete mixtures shall be placed without segregation, then consolidated, finished to the proper elevation, and textured. Curing the concrete pavement shaft be in occur* dance with one of the methods germitted in Section 50.7 pertaining to curing. Pavement shoulders, curbs, gutters and other incidental features shag be replaced in kind unless otherwise approved by the Gagionul Director or his representative. b. Temporary Pavement that is replaced temporarily may be paved with either a hot bituminous concrete mixture mentioned above or a culd bituminous patching mixture. When a cold patching mixture is used it shall consist of aggregate and bituminous material proportioned and mixed in a bituminous mixing plant or rotating paddle shaft pugmgL Regardless which patching mixture is used it shall be laid on a prepared foundation end thoroughly compacted. Since cold bituminous patching mixtures are subject to distortion by traffic, the temporary patch shall be maintained to provide a smooth surface until the pavement is permanently replaced. 3. Manholes Manhole frames and covers shag have sufficient structural adequacy to support the roadway traffic. The type of manhole frame and cover shall be approved by the Regional Director or his representative. The manhole frame shall he set flush with the surface of The roadway unless otherwise permitted by the Regional Director or his representative. O. MAINTENANCE AND PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC 1. Traffic is to be maintained at ail times during the progress of this work and adequate signs, barricades and lights shag he provided in accordance with the provisions of Sub-chapter H of the N.Y.S. Department of TransportaUon's Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A maintenance and protection of traffic plan may be required. No Janes shag be closed without prior approval. 2. The applicant shag erect and maintain suitable barricades around all trenches while work is in progress for the protection of the public, and they shall he suitably lighted hy yellow lights at night. The work shall be carried on in such manner that not more than 100 feet of trench in earth remains open at end of day's work. 3. No pavement cuts are to be left unfilled over night, except in emergencies, and in such cases, adequate precautions must be exercised to protect traffic. Prior approvul must be obtained to use steel plating. 4. No construction materiuls or equipment shall be left on the shoulders or pavement after working hours, nor shall any construction equipment or material be placed in any manner or location that will obstruct highway or railroad warning signs. 5. Ag open trench in the highway right-of.way shall be barricaded. There shag be conspicuously displayed bright red flags no less than 24" x 24" attached to such barricades and giuminated at night with flashing yellow lights. If in the judgment of the representative of the Commissioner of Transportation, flagman are necessary, they shall be employed by the permittee and on duty at all times during the progress of the work so as to direct traffic and maintain yellow Nashing lights, etc. 6. Soft shoulder signs of adequate size, not less than 24" square, shag be erected and maintained on ail backfill trenches within the shoulder area until the backfill is thoroughly settled. These signs shall be located at the beginulng of each section of work at intersections and at a distance not greater than 1000 feet apart. 7. Ouring winter conditions highway shoulders shag be maintained free of obstructions which would interfere with snow removal and ice control. 8. The permittee shall keep the traveled way frae of foreign objects such as rocks, timber and other items that may fall from transporting vehicles. Spillage of materiul carried by or dropped from the under.carriage of any carrying vehicle resulting from the permittee's hauling operations along or across any public traveled way shag be removed immediate- ly and such traveled way, both within and outside of the work limits, shall be kept free of such spillage by the permittee. E. COMPLETION OF WORK 1. All work is to be performed in a menner approved by the Resident Engineer of the State Department of Transportation. 2. Air disturbed areas shall be returned to their original condition in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner of Transportation or his reprasectaUve 3. The permUtee shall be required to restore shoulders and ditches and clean up the highway as his work progresses. All driveways shall be restored with material in kind and to their original conditions. 4. All surplus earth and rubbish shall be cleaned up and removed from the highway rlght.of-wey upon completion of the work, and the highway left in a neat and orderly condition. 5. As built plans showing final grade of new installation and existing underground facilities encountered shall be provided to N.Y.S.D.O.T. if verlation from approved design plans occurred during construction. F. NECESSITATED FUTURE WORK f. The applicant agrees, that any present or future injury to or disturbance of the highway, its slopes or gutters, caused by placing mains and service pipe shall be repaired by the apglicent at his own expense and in accordance with the requirements of the State Department of Transportation. 2. If necessity arises in the future because of the work on the State Highway system and/or its structures, requiring the removal, relocation or replacement of the installaUon authorized hy the permit, said work shall be done as directed by the Commissioner or his representative, and all cost and expense so incurred shall be the obligation of the said permittee ar his successor in interest. II. TELEPHONE - TELEGRAPH INSTALLATIONS A. SETTING OF POLES f. All poles shall be set outside the ditch lines so that the proper drainage of the highway wili not he interfered with. In case it is impracticable to set poles so as not to interfere with the flow of water in the ditches, the shoulder, gitch and space around the poles shall be paved by the applicant to protect against wash. 2.There shall be no obstruction to private driveways, connecting highways er roads, paths or sidewalks. 3. In case it is found necessary to trim trees within the boundaries of the highway, the least gossible amount shall be done, and in ell cases the consent of the abutting property owner must be secured hefore the poles are set and trees trimmed. 4. Poles shall be of sufficient length to provide a clearance of net less than eighteen feet between the wire and the crown of the highway, under the worst condtitions of temperature and leading. They shall be set in line and properly plumbed. They shall he well guyed. No Buying to tree~, unless by special peneissien of owoer. Special precautions shall he taken on curves and where gees cross from one side of highway to the other. Poles shall be straight, sound, and the fittings shall be of sufficient strength to carry wires under the worst condition of loading (ice, wind, etc). R. Where telegraph and telephone wires cross high tension power lines, electric light or trolley wires, special preceufion shall be taken to maintain proper clearance under the worst condition of temperature and loading. B. RESETTfNG POLES 1. If necessity arises in future, because of work on the highway, to relocate, replace or re-set poles, caules or conduits, said work shall be done at the expense of the applicant. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. In addition to the aforementioned conditions, if it is found necessary by this Department to add to or otherwise modify the same, it is to be understood such changes shall form a part of the permit and be complied with immediately upon notice. IV. ADOITIONAL SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND SKETCHES - See Attached Sheet. PERM 41-1d 14186) METHOD OF PERFORMING WORK WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY [. GENERAL CONDITIONS These conditions and regulations apply to Highway Work Permits authorizing work within the State highway right*of-way for water mains, gas mains, ~wer lines and miscellaneous structures. General conditions apply to telephone and telegraph installations as well as specific conditions on the setting and resetting of poles. These conditons, and any special conditions which are added to this form, are enforceable by the Oepartment of Transportation. A. TIME 1. Work under the permit shall be commenced within thirty (30) days from the date of permit issuance unless a later starting date is approved by the Regional Traffic Engineer. B. REOUIREMENTS All the current requirements of the following shag apply: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Federal Department of Labor, Safety and ReaUh Standards 129 CFR 192EIlglO); Part 131, Title 17, New York Code of Rules and Regulations, Accommodation of Utilities Within State Right-of-Way; New York State Department of Labor, IndustUal Code Rule 23, Protection of Persons Employed in Construction and OemoliUon Work; Industrial Code Rule 53, Construction, Excavation and Demolition Operations At Or Near Underground Facgities. Temporary soil erosion and water pollution controls shall be used as required. The final decision on the method of underground instagation will be made by the Regional Director or his representative. 1. Work Within Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Installations that cross the pavement and shoulder area. Wherever practical, all underground installations shall be placed beneath the pavement and shoulder areas without disturbance to these paved surfaces. 1) Boring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN The location of all excavations (jacking pits, etc.) shall be shown in plan and profile. b) The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall he determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The IocaUon of all other existing utilities shell be shown. d) The construction equipment and procedures to be used shall be described in the permit application. The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary, shaft be made available for review by the Department. fi The underground installation shall he described in detail, i.e. size, length, depth, material, provisions for grouting, etc. g) Pipes shall generally he enclosed in sleeves or larger p~pes. Small diameter services 12 inch I.D. or smaller) may be placed without sleeving at the discretion of N.Y.S.D.O.T. The limits of an open excavation shall not he closer than 10 feet to the edge of the pavement unless approved by the Department. Open excavations shall he protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transporta- tion, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION a) Grouting operations may be required il surlace settlement, loss of sec or voids around the pipe develop. When grout is required, it shall cons;st of f part cement to 2 parts sand, by volume, and sufficient water to produce a consistency suitable for placing the grout. h) Backfill of open excavations shall be as required under 2.1 f) Open Excavation Method. 2J Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all pavement crossing by the open excavation method shall be shown in plan and profile. bi The sod profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface exploration. c) The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. dl The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary, shall be made avaiable for review by the Department. e) When requested, the construction equipment and procedures to be used shall be described in the permit application. fi Pipe installations shall be done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of TransportaUon's Standard Sheets. The required granular material shall meet the material requirements for Select Granular Fill in the current New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Specifications including addenda. Exceptions will only he allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. g) Pavement shall he saw cut at termination points of pavement replacement. CONSTRUCTION a) Pavement and shoulder removal shall be done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section. Straight, vertical cuts of 1he pavement will be required. Pavement surfaces that become undermined shall be cut back and removed. Alternative repair methods may be used if prior approval is granted. The backfill material shall be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfilling structures, culverts, pipes, conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200, Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. C) Generally, cuts shell be filled at the end of each working day. With prier approval, steel cover plates may be used. Recessing of these plates may be required. d) Temporary pavements and sheuiders shall be placed as soon as a crossover installation is completed. b. Installations that are longitudinal to the pavement. 1) Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) The location of all open excavations shall be shown in p~an and profile. bi The soil profile and groundwater conditions shall be determined by adequate subsurface expioraDon. c) The design of all excavations, including ground and surface water control where necessary, shall be made available for review by the Department. The location of all other existing utilities shall be shown. el Pipe i~stallations shall be done according to the requirements of the appropriate New York State Department of Transportation's Standard Sheets. The required granular material sheg meet the material requirements for Select Granular Pill in the current New York State Department of Traflsportation's Standard Specifications, including addenda. Exceptions will only be allowed if prior approval is granted by the Regional Soils Engineer. CONSTRUCTION a) Pavement and shoulder removal shall be done in a manner that provides for proper restoration of the replacement section. Straight, vertical cuts of the pavement will be required. Pavement surfaces that become undermined shall be cut back and removed. Alternative repair methods may be used if prior approval is granted. h) The backflg material shall be pieced and compacted according tn the requUements for backfilling structures, culverts, pipes, conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200, Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportatien's Specifications, including addenda. c) Generally, cuts shag be filled at the end of each working day. With prior approval, steel cover p~ates may be used. Recessing of these plates may be required. d) Permanent or temporary pavement shall be placed ~mmediately as sections of the total instahetien are completed to subbase elevation. Gravel surfaces in shoulder areas may be used if prior approval is granted. 2) Roring, Jacking, and Tunneling Methods DESIGN al All the requirements of B.1. a. 1.) DESIGN a) through g) shall apply. CONSTRUCTION al All the requirements of B.f a. 1.) CONSTRUCTION al and b) shall apply. bi Open excavations shall be protected with the required controls for safety and for the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. cl The requirements of B.1. h. 1.i CONSTRUCTION d) shall apply. 2. Work Outside the Pavement and Shoulder Areas a. Open Excavation Method DESIGN a) All the requirements of B.1. b. 1.) DESIGN shed apply. b) Open excavations shall be protected with the requried controls for safety and lot the maintenance and protection of traffic in accordance with the New York State Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. CONSTRUCTION aJ The backfill material shag be placed and compacted according to the requirements for backfilling structures, culverts, pipes, conduits and direct burial cable described in Section 200, Earthwork, New York State Department of Transportation's Specifications, including addenda. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 23, 2005 Mr. George Giannaris 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, NY 11935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town lIall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan for Hellenic Restaurant Located on the n/s/o NY State 25, approximately 532' w/o Shipyard Lane in East Marion SCTM#1000-35-2-14 Zone: LB/R80 Dear Mr. Giannaris: The final public hearing regarding the maps for the above-referenced site plan has been scheduled for Monday, September '12, 2005, at 6:20 p.m. at the Southold Town Hall. Please refer to the enclosed copy of Chapter 58, Notice of Public Hearing, in regard to the Town's notification procedure. The notification form is enclosed for your use. The sign and the post will need to be picked up at the Planning Board Office, Southold Town nd Annex (2 Floor, North Fork Bank). Please return the enclosed Affidavit of Posting along with the certified mailing receipts AND the signed green return receipt cards before 12:00 noon on Friday, September 9, 2005. The sign needs to be returned to the Planning Board Office after the public hearing. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, ~/Jerilyn B. VVoodhouse Chairperson encs. JOHN GIANNARIS SITE PLAN FOR HELLENIC RESTAURANT 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Proposal for addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519- acre parcel in the LB Zone MON. - September 12, 2005 - 6:20 P.M. § 58-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1 Chapter 58 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING § 58-1. Prov/&i~g notice of public hear~n=~s. [HISTORY: Adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Southold 12-27-1995 as L.L. No. 25-1995. Amendments noted where applicable.] § 58-1. Pro. ding notice of public hearings. Whenever the Code calls for a public hearing, this section shall apply. Upon determining that an application is complete, the board or commission reviewing the same shall fix a time and place for a public hearing thereon. The board or commission reviewing an application shall provide for the giving of notice: A. By causing a notice gi~ing the time, date, place and nature of the hearing to be published in the official newspaper within the period prescribed by law. B. By requiring the applicant to erect the sign provided by the town, which shall bo prominently displayed on the premises facing each public or private street which the property involved in the application abuts, giving notice of the application, the nature of the approval sought thereby and the time and place of the public hearing thereon. The sign shall be set back not more than ten (10) feet from the property line. The sign shall be displayed for a period of not less than seven (7) days immediately preceding the date of the public hearing. The applicant or his/her agent shall file an affidavit that s/he has complied with this provision. C. By requiring the applicant to send notice to the owners of record of every property which abuts and eve~-y property which is across from any public or pr/vate street 5801 ~-~-~ .... Southold Town Planning Board Notice to Adlacent Property Owners You are hereby given notice: 1. That the undersigned has applied to the Planning Board of the Town of $outhold for a site plan; 2. That the property which is the subject of the application is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: SCTM#1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 3. That the property which is the subject of this application is located in the LB/R80 Zone; That the application is for an addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519-acre parcel located approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New York State Road 25 in East Marion; That the files pertaining to this application are open for your information during normal business days between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. (2nd FI., North Fork Bank). Or, if you have any questions, you can call the Planning Board Office at (631)765-1938; That a public hearing will be held on the matter by the Planning Board on Monday, September 12~ 2005 at 6:20 p.m. in the Meeting Hall at $outhold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold; that a notice of such hearing will be published at least five days prior to the date of such hearing in the Traveler Watchman, published in the Town of Southold; that you or your representative have the right to appear and be heard at such hearing. Petitioner/Owner's Name(s): John Giannaris/Hellenic Restaurant Date: 8/24/05 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING This is to serve notice that I personally posted the property known as by placing the Town's official poster notice(s) within 10 feet of the front property line facing the street(s) where it can be easily seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the public hearing on I have sent notices, by certified mail - return receipt, the receipts and green return receipt cards of which are attached, to the owners of record of every property which abuts and every property which is across on Your Name (print) Signature Address Date Notary Public PLEASE RETURN THIS AFFIDAVlT, CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS & GREEN RETURN RECEIPT CARDS BY: noon~ Fri. 9/9/05 Re: Proposed Site Plan: Hellenic Restaurant SCTM#: 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Date of Hearing: Monday, September 12, 2005, 6:20 p.m. SOUTHOLD TOWN Members present were Architects Glynis B~rry a;d'Ural T~ Chairmen Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith, Jamos Grathwohl, Histodc Preservation Commission as well as Herbert Ernest, Nicholas J. Planamento and Ronald McGreevy. Also present were Bruno Semen and Denise Heyse of the Planning Board Staff, Martin Kosmynka for North Fork Self Storage, Ronnie Hill for Cutchogue Business Center and.BCB Realty Holding Company, William German for Hellenic Snack Bar and Dr. Michael Catapano for the Catapano Dairy Farm. MOVED by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Sanford Hanauer, it was RESOLVED, after an amendment to eliminate references to landscaping in the Cutchogue Business Center approval and noting that other changes would be incorporated in the minutes of this meeting, to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting of June 23, 2005. Vote of tile Committee: Ayes All. NORTH FORK SELF STORAGE (Count5 Road 48. 370 feet east of' Depot Lane - Cutchoguei SCTk,Ir¢ 1000-96~1-1.4 .-~lm a, dis~ ussion of thc ikasib~t3 of hnplcmcntmg the Cotm~acc's recommcnd~ltions of June 23 and a~'ccmenr to move the garage doors t~acmg south, remov~ thc libel fl'oln thc si~ lhc~g Route 48, add a ~'ound si~ at file entrance, plant a clump of drought resistant slmibs to break the view of Bufld~g 5 and a rexiew ofll~e entrance fence and ca~alo~m~ cuts of the exterior lJsJ~tmg, it w;~s MOVED by Glynis Bony and seconded b> Herbc~q l~rnesI to APPROVE the APPI,ICA'F[ON as othem'ise sub~aed. Vole of thc Committee: ayes aH 'Ibc Comnfiltce rcco~nends to the Pla~g Board lhat cedars and olives be planted ~ d~e buffer areas. Ufa[ Talgat will be able to suggest other drought resistam shrubs. .kl)phcanls arc reminded that devialions h'om approved dra~v~gs without linc rex.4cw :md approx, al or' Iht Arcltitcctm'al Review C'onu~rtee will cause recisslon ot thc od¢lal approval and may negatively impact sccm~g the Ce~ificate of Occup:mcy. (".XTA. PANO DAI'RY FARM ( 33'705 North Road - Peconic) SC'F~ la lt~t)0-74-2- [ 2.2 .~PROVE lhc proposed si~ h~ F[ rLFILI,MENT of d~c [~al CON1)ITION.. .-kl)plicants arc reminded that tlexiations Ii'om apl)roved tlra~v~gs without approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. BCB REALTY HOLDING. CORPORATION (74825 Mart Road - Greennpor(i SCTM# 1000-45-4-8-3 Moved by Herberi Ernest and seconded by Ron McCn'eevey, it ~,,as RI~;SOLVED Io APPROVE the APPLICATION with the CONDITIONS that the dimensions and lighting of the street sign and locations and design of entrance and exit signs be submilted :[br approval. The Planning Board is asked to note a discussion of natm'al li~ting for the hallway of the apartments by skylights or donners that could result in a design change and that it appears that outward opening doors of thc office/residential building could block sidewalk. ',rote of the Committee: Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that de',Aations from approved drawings without the rexiew and approval of the )u'clfitectural Review Committee will cause rescission of the original approval and may negatively hnpact upon securing the Certilicate of Occupancy. lhSELLENIC SNACK B.tttl (Route 25 - East Marion) SCTIvI# 1000-35-2-14 Regrettably, the Cmmnittee continued to have difficulty in reconciling thc elevations, floor plan and site plan, seeing presumed inconsistencies belween them. The applicant is asked to label the elevations and floor plans (showflxg the windows on the latter), pro~,id¢ coml~directions and check fl~e plans for accuracy. The ARC also requests drawings of file tlu'ee elevations of thca')ax~i~on with details of pilasters, fascia and the retainin~Tsystem fro' the hurricane shutters (the latter alqo on an:' other new wh~dows): also a drawing of tbe21etail of the ratline of the handicap ramp: The Planning Board is asked to note that thc entry sequence fi'om the parking lo all building entrances needs to be re-examined for handicap accessibility and continuity. The meeting adjourned at 6:30 pmm. Robert Keith Co-Chamnan PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 11, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Soul;hold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 George Giannaris 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re~ Hellenic Snack Bar Scheduled ARC Meeting SCTM# 1000-35.-2-14 Zone: LB Dear Mr. Giannaris: The above site plan application is an agenda item for the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 18, 2005 in the Southold Town Hall Conference Room. Attached is a copy of the agenda. Please submit all ARC materials to the Planning Department before the meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Denise Heyse Plmmer Trainee att. cc: file PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON August 11, 2005 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NYl1971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 John Giannads 300 Maple Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Re~ Hellenic Snack Bar Scheduled ARC Meeting SCTM# 1000-35.-2-14 Zone: LB Dear Mr. Giannaris: The above site plan application is an agenda item for the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, August 18, 2005 in the Southold Town Hall Conference Room. Attached is a copy of the agenda. Please submit all ARC materials to the Planning Department before the meeting date or bring the materials ~vith you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Denise Heyse Planner Trainee att. cc: file Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: Date: Comments: faosimile TRANSMITTAL DaLe: Fax #: Re: Pages: cove~) Southold Town Planning 55095 Main P.O. Box 1179 Soul:hold, NY 11971 Phone: 765-1958 Fax ~-: 765-$156 SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 23. 2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 3:00 p.m. Members present were: Glynis Berry, Architect Ural Talgat, Architect Herbert Ernest, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Nicholas J. Planamento, Southold Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck Howard Meinke, Cutchogue (A Landmarks Preservation member to succeed Herbert Adler will be named shortly). JUN 2005 Also present were Mrs. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairman of Planning Board as well as Bruno Semon and Victor L'Eplattenier of the Planning Board Staff. Present at 4:00 p.m. when applications were undertaken were Martin Kosmynka for North Fork Self Storage, Mr. And Mrs. Lee Beninati for Whitaker House, Patricia Moore for the Moore Law Office, Henry and Stephanie Bremer for Bremer's Deli, Ronnie Hill for Cutchogue Business Center, La Panache and (with Brett Kiehl) for BCB Realty Holding Company, John Romanelli for Burt's Reliable, Michael Catapano for the Catapano Dairy Farm as well as Arthur Foster and Brownell Johnston for Artco Drainage Corp. The Committee devoted the first hour to reorganizing. Glynis Berry and Ural Talgat were welcomed as architectural members who have agreed to serve on an interim basis until December 31,2005. Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith were elected Co-Chairman, the latter to serve on an interim basis until December 31. The Committee then discussed the desirability of providing design guidelines for the structures planned for the Industrial Subdivision approved for the intersection of Depot Lane and the North Road. These will be the first industrial buildings to be considered in a common setting. Also the location is on a Scenic Byway. In its commitment to the Scenic Byway Advisory Board, the Town indicated that it would "Define and encourage (through a combination of controls and incentives) development standards for development that maintain priority views and vistas." The architects on the Committee were asked to develop recommendations of color ranges for sidewalls, roofs and trim, the siting and lighting of signage, fencing, exterior lighting and roof lines, the latter to suggest the lines of local the farm barns. We will ask for a meeting with the Planning Board once this proposal has been thought through. MOVED by Howard Meinke and seconded by Sanford Hanauer, it was RESOLVED to approve the minutes of the meeting of March 2,5, 2005. NORTH FORK SELF STOl;LA. GE (County Road 48, 370 feet east of Depot L.ane - Cutchogue) SCTM~ 10(i0-96-1-1.4 Thc applicant described 5 metal buildings total/rig 38,000 sq. ft. on flu'ce acres. Thc root~. sidewalls, and garage doors ~viIl be Evero~'ecn wilh Classic Beige trim. Am office is planned in the no,'~hwes~ coaler of the widesl bnilding, #3. Black ,Anyl cbain link fence ~vill be used except neat' thc entrance gale. Tile Committee lhst tl~anks thc applicanl for the considerable effort made to improve upon lhe design of the .tspical steel self-storage facility. 'Fben after extensive discussion and to improve the project lhrther il was MOVED by Robert Keitli and seconded by Howard Meiake to TABLE the application to requesl consideration of the following: !. Move the southerly fence to a line 95' fi'om d~e North Road and remaining parallel to it, this to shield the fence in the planth~gs, 2.Terminate and return the easterly fence to the nordleast and southeast corners of building ~3 and pro'.ide gates in the return sections to allow Fire Depart access beh/nd tide building. 3. Divide building g5 into two sections with a 20' separation to relie~,'e the long expanse of the building. 4. Moxe tide building lighting on tile South end of all 5 buildings to pos! mounted fixtures. say. 12' high located at the bult'cr and directed imvard. 5.Substitute a ground si,~pa, ground lit at tl~e entrance. 6.Remove thc hghdng fi'om thc Imilding mounted sign facing tide North Road. 7.Move the garage doors thcing No~tb or South m bofl~ corners of buildings 2,3 and 4 to thcc East or West. g. I~'possible. usc a color for the building trim and the office to a shade closer to that shown m the clex. ations. 9.Prov/dc cat:dogue cuts of thc storage doors and post mounted lighting and mcbit¢crural l~ncc at Ih¢ entrance :also please show locations of xvnts, exterior ah' and heating units. VOle of thc Comnfi~tce: Ayes All, ~A'HITAKER HOUSE (Main Road - Soud~old) SCTM#I000-61-1-5 MOVED by H-o~vard Meinke and seconded by Robe~l Keith. it was RESOLVED lo ACC EI~T Fl ;I ,FI1,LMENT of Iht condinons scl/Btlh at tide meeting of March 3. 2005. l-h~. applicant ~;~s refened ~o d~e Town Code for informalion about thne limirs on ex[odor lighls. SNAC. K BAR (Route 25 - East Marion) SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Move~ by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by ~?rbert Ernest, it was RESOLVI~:D to TABI~ fl~e applicalion awaiting more complete plans with dimensions as well.as plans and elevations that coincide and are keyed appropriately. The applicant is also asked to r~vicw the. AR( checklist fbr missing items. ~o1' fl~c £.om~,ycs ?dl. __ . _ ALBERTSON .~DkRINE (tX.lain Road - Southold) SCTM# 1000-56-3-13.4) Moved by Robert Keilh and seconded by Howard Meink~, it was RESOLVED ACCEPT fl~¢ m'clfitectural changes in file pediment on fl~e South elevation The conditions pertaining to signage and exterior lighting remain outstanding. Voleofthe Core,nitres: Ayes all. Applicants are renfinded that deviations ii'om approved drawings without the review and approval of the ,,V'chitectural Review Committee ~411 cause .recission of thc original approval and ma),' negatively hnpact upon securing the Certificate of ()ccupancy. The meeting adjourned at 7:01) p.m. Robert Keilh ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE After the Plantdng Board staff notifies you in writing that your application is acceptable, the relevant itdbnnation on Ibc check Ii.st be. low should be submitled to lhe Cmmnittee, all al one time, and tiu'ough the Planning Board stafl~ If you wish to have your samples returned, please note tiffs on fl~e envelope. 1 Site Plan 2. Floor plans, drawn to scale (~,4" to 1 'preferred) by a l/censed architect or engineer (design professional) shoxving the ~,pe of construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fu-e prolection ~vltlls. · 3. ~,leYation drawings to scale (also ';~" to 1' } of all sides of each building prepared, by a design profkssional. 4. The type ami color of lhe items thal follows are To be shown on the drawings. Please ir, elude samples where aplxopnate. Root-rog Siding Wh~dows. doors and trhn Exterior hcating,,coolmg equipmenl such as heat pumps and air cor~dJlionin~ t~qU[I)Ill~II[. Also show Ihcqr locations. Roof mounted mechanical equipment. Roo~' alld sidewall pt'he,rations for plumbLng and mechamcal equipmcm, klsc, ir~dic,qtc Ihe their locations and material. ~ laqom3 material roi chinmeys or accznt x~dls. 41so prox/de szunples o~ pile) loCi aphs. Exterior lighting frxmres, bolh fi'ee standing and building-mounled. Please show locations and include catalogue cuts. 5. Photographs of existing andSor neighboring propm-lies fi-om four dh'ec'tions of tl~e projecl site. 6. Exterior stgnage, both building-mounted and free standing. Include type, colors, design and location. Over the years the Committee has de;'eloped p,-eferences wlfich will be of interes~ m apphcants and thek desi~ professionals. These Nclude: Natural 5.lale~ials N~n~ View of Pax'~g Roof Penetrations Ndde~ fi'om the road. Free sl~mdNg liO~ting of ~mum height and directed inward. N lechatucal ectu~pment hidden fiom x'iew Steel bu~dh~gs, when proposed, to have a roof pitch of at least 5 12 and be clad wood when visible flora :~ road. Whqclows attcl doors consislent with the clcsi~a of Iht building. THE ARC![tlTF. C'I t rRA1. REVIEW ('O...XD, tITTEE \~EI COl', []!~S PRE- SUBSIISSION C(IN[.'EI>,I~NCES I'll-fOR TO THE .~,I>PLIC,VflON PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 25, 2005 Mr. George Giamiaris 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, NY 11935 Re: Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 New York State Road 25 (Main Road), East Marion, NY 11939 SCTM# 1000-35.-2-14 Zone: LB Dear Mr. Giannaris: This letter is to inform you that the above site plan application was reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on June 23, 2005. A copy of the meeting minutes, and ARC requirements checklist, is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. Please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions you can contact us at 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. ~.~ect fully yours, Denise Heyse Planner Trainee CC:file enc. ARC minutes, ARC requirements checklist PLANNING BOARD MEMBEORS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 July 12,2005 Mr. George Giannaris 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, N.Y. 11935 Re: Proposed Amended Site Plan Hellenic Restaurant Located on the n/s/o NY State 25, approximately 532' w/o Shipyard Lane SCTM#1000-35-2-14 Zone: LB/R80 Dear Mr. Giannaris: The following resolution was adopted at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, July 11,2005: WHEREAS, the applicant proposes an amended site plan for a proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519 acres parcel in the LB Zone located on the n/s/o State Road 25, approximately 532' w/o Shipyard Lane in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-35.-2-14; and WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board reviewed the new proposed action and determined that it is less in use and does not present a significant change from the original site plan; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2002 the Southold Town Planning Board started the lead agency coordination process on this Unlisted Action; therefore, be it RESOLVED that, on July 11,2005, the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants an amended Negative Declaration, modifying the previous Negative Declaration dated July 8, 2002, issued for the original proposal including 12 duplex hotel units with a pool and spa, and no changes to the existing restaurant. Enclosed is a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Page Two, Hellenic Restaurant, July 12, 2005 Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, house Chairperson End. cc: Mark Terry, Sr. Environmental Planner PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 6Sl 765-3136 State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant July 11, 2005 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed Site Plan for the Hellenic Restaurant SCTM#: 1000-35-2-14 Location: On the north side of State Road 25,approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane, in East Marion SCTM# 1000-35.-2~14 Zone: LB/R80 SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: The proposed action involves an amended site plan for a proposed addition to the existing restaurant containing 250 seats on 1.519 acres parcel in the LB Zone, located on the north side of New State Road 25,approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane, in East Marion. SCTM# 1000-35.-2-14 Reasons Supporting This Determination: A revised Environmental Assessment Form for the amended proposal has been submitted and reviewed and it was determined that no significant adverse impacts to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. The determination upon the following: SEQR Negative Determination-Paqe Two No major change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy will occur. No creation of a hazard to human health is expected to occur. The proposed action will not cause a substantial change in the use, or intensity of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources, or in its capacity to support existing uses. No substantial adverse change in existing air quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels; no substantial increase in solid waste production, potential for erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems will occur as a result of this action. No significant removal or destruction of large quantities or destruction of large quantities of vegetation; no substantial interference with the movement or any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; no significant impacts on a significant habitat area; no substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; no other significant adverse impacts to natural resources will occur. The proposed action is not in material conflict with a community's current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted. The proposed action will not impair the character or quality of important historical, archaeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources of existing community or neighborhood character For Further Information: Contact Person: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Address: Southold Town Planning Board Telephone Number: (631) 765-1938 (x 229) Cc: Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Applicant Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Engineer Suffolk County Department of Health Services New York State Department of Transportation Suffolk County Water Authority Suffolk County Department of Public Works SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 23.2005 The ARC met at the Town Hall Annex at 3:00 p.m. Members present were: Glynis Berry, Architect Ural Talgat, Architect Herbert Ernest, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Nicholas J. Planamento, Southold Ronald McGreevy, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck Howard Meinke, Cutchogue (A Landmarks Preservation member to succeed Herbert Adler will be named shortly). JU I 28 2005 Also present were Mrs. Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairman of Planning Board as well as Bruno Semon and Victor L'Eplattenier of the Planning Board Staff. Present at 4:00 p.m. when applications were undertaken were Martin Kosmynka for North Fork Self Storage, Mr. And Mrs. Lee Beninati for Whitaker House, Patricia Moore for the Moore Law Office, Henry and Stephanie Bremer for Bremer's Deli, Ronnie Hill for Cutchogue Business Center, La Panache and (with Brett Kiehl) for BCB Realty Holding Company, John Romanelli for Burt's Reliable, Michael Catapano for the Catapano Dairy Farm as well as Arthur Foster and Brownell Johnston for Artco Drainage Corp. The Committee devoted the first hour to reorganizing. Glynis Berry and Ural Talgat were welcomed as architectural members who have agreed to serve on an interim basis until December 31,2005. Sanford Hanauer and Robert Keith were elected Co-Chairman, the latter to serve on an interim basis until December 31. The Committee then discussed the desirability of providing design guidelines for the structures planned for the Industrial Subdivision approved for the intersection of Depot Lane and the North Road. These will be the first industrial buildings to be considered in a common setting. Also the location is on a ,Scenic Byway. In its commitment to the Scenic Byway Advisory Board, the Town indicated that it would "Define and encourage (through a combination of controls and incentives) development standards for development that maintain priority views and vistas." The architects on the Committee were asked to develop HELLENIC SNACK BAR (Route 25 - East Marion) SCTM# I000-35-2-14 Moved by Sanford Hanauer and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RI/;SOLVED to TABLE the application awaiting more complete plans with dimensions as well,as floor plans and elevations that coincide and are keyed appropriately. The al)plicam is also asked to rex.iow the AR(' checklist fbr missing items. Vote of'thc Commiuee: Ayes All. ALBERTSON \LKIIlNE (Main Road - Southold) SCTM~- 1000-56-3-13.4) Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED ACCEPT the arclfitectm'al changes in the pediment on the South elevation The conditions pertaining to signage and exterior lighting remain outstartding. Voteol'the Committee: Ayes all. Applicants are renfi, nded that dex,ialions fi'om approved drawings without the rex,4ew and approval of the ;~a'chitectural Re'~iew Committee x~ll cause recission of thc original approval and may negatively hnpact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. '[he meeting adjourned at 7:0() p.m. Rob¢~l Keith Secretary Mote of the Commiltee: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without thc re.,,icw and approval of the .~'cNtectural Review Committee will cause rccission of the original approval and may negatively impact securing lhe Certificate of Occupancy. BREMER'S DEll (Main Road - Marttituck) SCTMe1000-142-2-22) Moved by Howard Meinke and seconded by Sanford Hanaucr, it was RESOLVED to ACCEPT the of the CONDITIONS set forth in the meeting of March 3, 2005. except that the agreed latlice screening will required to shield the ah' conditioning unit. \'otc of the Com,nillce: Ayes all. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved drawings without tlie rctSew and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and ma.'3' negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occpancy.'. CUTCItOGUE BUSINESS CENTER (Cox Lane and Oregon Road - Cutcho~e)SCTMtt 1000-83-3-4-4.6 Moved by Ronald McGreew and seconded by Sanford ttanauer, it was RESOLVED to accept thc information provided in FULFILLM[ENT of the CONDITIONS set forth at the meeting of August 3. 2004 It is reconunended to the Planning Board thai the evers'tens to bc planted in buffer zone be at least 5' tall and be angled at 30 degrees where neccssatT at thc intersection of Cox Land and Oregon Road. \'otc oftlie Com,rdttee: Ayes all. Al}plicants are retninded that dexiations fi'om approved drawings ~vithoot the ,'cxie~x and approval of the Arclfitecmral Review Contraittee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of (%cupancy. BURT'S RELIABLE (1515 Youngs Avenue - Southold) SCTM#1000-96-1-1.4 The applicant described an addition connecting two existing buildings on the North side of the property, Thc most westerly of the two build'rags will also be widened by 5'. Siding. , oofing and trim will match the materials on the existing buildings. Moved by Howard Meinke, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the plan as submiued. Vote of the Commiltee: Ayes All. Apl)licants are reminded ~hat dex4ations from approved drawings ~ithout thc review and approval of the Arclfitectural Re:iow Co,mniuee will cause recission of the original approval and ma5' ncgati'vely impact upon securing the Certificate of Occulxmt_y. CATM-'.kNO DMRY FAR\ I (33705 Nnrlh Road - Pcconic) SCTix b~ 1000-74-2- l 2.2 I Thc plans depict a 150 x 55 metal barn with 3, 12 roof pitch, light bluc roof anti ~'ay sideswalls as ~ell as a 10t) sq. fl. farm stand. The barn is located well away fi-om the road and screened fi'om thc East. tx'loved by Robert Keith and by Glyrds Berry, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the APPLICATION with thc CONDITION that the signage be submitted from approval. Vote of the Cotmnittee: Ayes All. Applicants are rcrninded thai dexiations from approved drawings without the reviev~' anti approval of the .~rchitectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. I,A PANACHE IL&IR DESIGN (1100 Youngs Avenue - Southold) SCTM~ 1000-60-2- 7.1) Tlfis beau .ty salon MIl be located in an exisling house with no change to the exterior. tx loved by How,'u-d Meinke and seconded by Sanford Hananer, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the application with the CONDITIONS that the signage and catalogue cuts of the exterior limiting ft',:tures be submitted for approval. Vote of the Conunitlce: Ayes .411. Aapplicants arc reminded that deviations from approved drawings without the review and approval of the :h'chitecmral Review Conurdttee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively hnpact upon securktg thc Certificate of t)ccupancy. AIRTCO DIL3,1NAGE Coimnerc¢ Drive and Corporate Drive - Cutchogue) SCTM~ 1 O00-96~ 1-1.5 Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Ronald McGreew, it was RESOLVED to thank tile Platming Board for referral of tile apphcaion but to acknox~,leclge that there arc no architectural clements upon which Io comment. The Committee mcormnends flint the Town plant screening on its landfdl proper~y along thc easterly side of the In(lust~ial Pm'k to shield the fence and buildings fron-t the North Road and the actJ,,ities to be developed on the capped landfill. Vote of the Conun/ttee: Ayes All. BCB REALTY HOLDING CORPORATION (74825 Main Road - Grecnnpol~) SCTMa 1000-45-4-8-3 lifts was a prclhninai?' presentalion of two buildings of about 4,000 sq. It. each. One buikling ,,,,'ill be .~ bank and tile other a medical office on the first floor txith 3 apartments above. Because thc decisionof the Zoning Board of Appeals may affect the design, the .'tRC will delay a fm'ther review until then. However, the Comnfittee endorses the desi~ma concepts and suggests that the exterior [igh6a~g pole be reduced to 12', thai bctlcr pedestrian access bc proxided fi'om the apartments to the Main Road and that tile height of' thc sign be reduced. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Fax (631) 765-9502 Telephone (631 ) 765-1802 BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF $OUTHOLr~ MEMORANDUM TO: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse, Planning Board Chairperson FROM: Michael J. Verity, Chief Building Inspector DATE: June 24, 2005 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION Project: Hellenic Restaurant Location: 5145 Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000 - Section 35- Block 02- Lot 14 Date: October 12, 2004 Revised Date: February 10, 2005 1. ALL BUILDINGS AND USES SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTERS 45 AND 100 OF THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CODE. 2. OFF STREET PARKING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 3. ALL FENCING, SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING BY AUTHORITY OF THE PLANNING BOARD. 4. THE PROPOSED USE *Restaurant IS/ARE A PERMITTED USE IN THIS LB DISTRICT AND IS SO CERTIFIED. * See ZBA Ref. 5699 Michael J. Chief Building Inspector J:m _2'2 O~ ' I 20- ',.-'-~o~ga N G,ar',n;~ ~s 6? 73442'SC_ p.2 Itme 22, 2005 Dear members of the Architectural Review Bo~d. I am li~ting within this letter a brief d~:scription of the architectural details of the ~ompleted addition to the existing restaurant known as the Hellenic Snack Bar .,nd t~staurant. 3) 4~ All exposed exterior w~ts will match the existing re.~taurant which is a white stucco exterior. Any visible roof is located ove~ the ~:dsting outdoor dining pavilion. The root coverins lhe futm~ extension will be of'he same type which is a lighl grey a'cM~ecmml roofing shingle. Any exposed sewer vents on'd~ roof will either be copper or will be painted to match the roof All atti~ vents will be ~nstallcd on The pan o£the roof that is not facing The eurren: exterior ligh'dng ia limi~eal t,., the cas~ alumkmm 8' tal~ lamp posts that linc thc front of thc restaurant. They ate Vi. ctorian ~n nalure and are faun painted to slmul,~te we~h,~red bronze. Each ~amp pc~t has t~e lights t~ it and each light is in a square glass housing. It is our intention to iasta]l lamp posL~ si:nilar 't,~ the existing oa~s in the fia~re Please inform me of any fitrther details you may n, ~. I thank you for your ~put in advance. FAX COVER PAGE **PLEASE DELIVER TO BRUNO SEMON IMMEDIATELY FOR ARC REVIEW** Two pages including cover From: George Giannaris 'Fo: Mr. Bnmo Semon APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Michael A. Simon Southold Town Hall ~'---'~'~ 53095 Main Road · EO. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenuel Southold. NY 11971 http://southoldmwn.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) 765-1809, Fax (631) 765-906~ .... i.---. - FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF MAY 12, 2005 //AY 2 ~, ZBA Ref. 569g - JOHN G~ANNAR~$ and GEORGE G~ANNARI$ Property Location: Hellenic Restaurant, 5145 Main Road, East Mari~n ' ~T~14. Zone District: Limited Business. ". SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration In this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 1.519-acre parcel has 238.3 ft. frontage along the north side of NYS Route 25 (or Main Road) at East Marion. The property is located in the Limited Business Zone District and improved with a restaurant, as shown on the October 12, 2004 site plan, amended February 10, 2005 by Young & Young, Surveyors. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's February 24, 2005 Notice of Disapproval, citing Section 100-82 in its denial of a building permit application additions and alterations to existing restaurant. The reason stated for disapproval is that the proposed construction will have a setback at less than 100 feet from the front property line for new construction (additions and alterations). FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 4, 2005 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicants wish to construct an enclosure with sliders and roof over the 30' x 34' patio which exists at 42.8 feet from the front lot line, and to construct a roof over the concrete walkway along the front of the restaurant building, existing at 22.64 feet from the front lot line at its closest point. Aisc proposed is new construction along the easterly side of the building, approximately 83 feet from the front lot line. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The property is surrounded on the north and west sides by Island End Golf Club properties, and on the east by land owned by the Village of Greenport Page 2 - May 12, 2005 ZB Ref. 5699 - John Giannaris CTM ID: 35-2~14 (leased parking lot), and a private access right-of-way and residences. It is the determination of the Board that the grant of the requested setback variances will not in any way alter the character of the neighborhood or district. The front setback of the building is presently 30.4 feet with 22.6 feet from the front concrete walkway. The applicant's proposed new roof will be 20' to the top of the highest ridge. The front walkway construction measure at 8 feet by 40 +- feet, and the roof with enclosure measures approximately 30 by 34 feet (over the existing patio), all as shown on the October 12, 2004 Plan noted as Sheet 2 (grading and drainage plan) and Plan noted as Sheet 1 (landscape and alignment), prepared by Young & Young, amended February 10, 2005. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The entrance way is filling an existing notch on the northeast corner of the restaurant which maintains the same open side yard. The front walk is preexisting of the zoning code and is being roofed over for inclement weather purposes. 3. The variance granted herein is substantial, and is 78 feet closer than the code-required 100 ft. setback from the street right-of-way. 4. The difficulty has been self-created and is related to the need for to roof over and alter the existing building and related entrance areas, which building has existed for over 40 years in a nonconforming location. 5. No evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. 6. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of additions and alterations, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Chairwoman Oliva, and duly carried, to GRANT the variances as applied for, as shown on the October 12, 2004 Plans noted as Sheet 2 (grading and drainage plan) and Sheet I (landscape and alignment plan), prepared by Young & Young, amended February 10, 2005, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: That the front roofed-over walkway construction not be enclosed. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Oliva (Chairwoman), Orlando, Dinizio, and Simon. Goehringer was absent.) T h i s R e sol ~ ~::~,p t(,e,~ ~ Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman 5/20/05 Approved for Filing (Member PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L~ EDWARDS MARTIN II. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main R& & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 To: Ruth D. Oliva Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appeals Fro m: Jerilyn B. Woodhouse Chairwoman, Southold Town Planning Board Re: Planning Board Application Review ( ZBA Application No. 5699) Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant, 5145 Main Road, East Marion SCTM: 35-2-14 DATE: May 4,2005 The Planning Board discussed this project at its Work Session on May 2, 2005 The Planning Board notes that the present application has been downsized from the original proposal. As a result, no hotel units are now shown on the plans, and the swimming pool has been eliminated. Most of the other changes reflect Health Department requirements for an upgraded sanitary system for the existing Hellenic restaurant. The proposed 1893 sq. ft. addition to the restaurant will allow relocation of the entrance, new restrooms, and improved internal circulation, without adding any new seats. Portions of the front and side walkways are proposed to be covered, and the patio dining area will be enclosed, to afford patrons improved weather protection. The Planning Board notes that a new parking area will be created behind the restaurant, and is concerned about the significant grade change between the existing overflow parking lot to the east, and the new parking lot and access to the restaurant. We note that several large trees are now located on the intervening slope, and would like to preserve as much of the natural landscaping as possible on the slope. The Planning Board has no objection to the pending ZBA application pertaining to the front yard setbacks. PLA~qI~G BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFYlCE LOCATION: Town Hail Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southaid, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 May 2,2005 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Pat: RE: Hellenic Snack Bar SC Tax Map # 1000-35-2-14 After reviewing the above files, we are returning the following extra material: Date of Map/Survey Description Date Received # copies April 26, 2001 Bldg. AlterationsJuly 9, 2001 1 March 3, 2001 Site Plan - Sept. 2, 2003 1 Dept. of Health March 22, 2004 Site Plan March 24, 2004 2 Oct. 12, 2004 Landscape Plan Nov. 9, 2004 1 Oct. 25, 2004 Site Plan Nov. 9, 2004 I Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Encs. A~PPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva. Chairwoman Gerard E Goehringer Vincent Orlando James Dinizio. Jr. Michael A. Simon TOWN MEMO http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631) '/65-1809 · Fax (631) 765-9064 Soathold Town Hall l I~ 53095 Main Road ° P.O. Box Southold, NY 11971-0959 Office Location: Town Annex/First Floor, North Fork Bank 54375 Main Road (at Youngs Avenue) Southold. NY 11971 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Ruth D. Oliva, ZBA Chairwoman April 25, 2005 APR 2 6 2'305 Request for Comments/Coordinated Review-Hellenic Restaurant As confirmed with your office today, the ZBA is reviewing the following application, and enclose copies of the Building Department's Notice of Disapproval, ZB application, and latest map. The Planning Board may be involved under the site plan review steps under Chapter 100 (Zoning), and your review and comments are requested at this time. The file is available for review of additional documentation at your convenience. NAME TAX#1 ZBA BD NOD VARIANCE PLANS PREPARER ZONE DATE DATE STAMPED JOHN AND 35-2-14 5699 2/25/05 Additions within Oct 12, Young & GEORGE LB Zone 100 ft. of lot line 2004, Young GIANNARIS along Main upd, (HELLENIC Road, 100-82. 2/10/05 RESTAURANT) Your comments are appreciated by May 4th, if possible (or alternatively May 1 l~h). Thank you. Ends. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Hellenic Cabins & Snack Bar Inc. PO Box 506 East Marion, NY 11939 Please take notice that your application dated January 28, 2005 · DATE: February 24, 2005 For permit to make additions and alterations to an existing restaurant at Location of property: 5145 Main Road. East Marion County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 35 Block2 Lot 1_~4 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 1.2 acre parcel in the Limited Business (LB) District, is not permitted nurauant to AtXicle VIII, Section 100-82, which states; "Except as otherwise provided herein, no buildings or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LB District unless the same conforms to the Bulk .Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk Schedule requires a minimum front yard setback of 100 feet. Following the proposed construction, the building will have a ~ont yard setback of 22.64 feet. Autho~/J~r~-d Signature CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS For Office Use Only SCTM1000Section~ BIock~ Lot(s) [~ LotSize ].~2 Zone District t~./~g)oM~ APPEAL THE ~WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR ATED: I Zoos wner(s): Address: Telephone: NOTE: If applicant la not the ~wner, state If applicant is owner's attorney, a~ent, architect, builder, contract vendee, eta, Authorize d Represcntativc:~)f. lY~'~._/I- Address: Pl~as~pecify who you wish cor~f.r~ondence to be mailed to, from the above lis(ed names: gl'Applicant/Owner(s) ,~[~thorized Representative [3 Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED FOR: ~'ding Permit. O Ce~il~cata of Occupancy 13 Pre-Certificute of Occupancy 13 Chnnge of Use E1 Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed, Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers, Do not quote the code. Article V]~'[X Secttonl00- ~_ Subsection Type of A.~al. An Appeal is made for: [~'A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. 13 A Variance due lo lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. 13 Interpretation of the Town Code, Article Section 13 Reversal or Other A prior appeal [3 has [~as not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year · ~/~ Page 2 of 3 - Appea~ Application Prat A: A[(~/~ VARIANCE REASONS (attach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undedrable change will not be produced In rite CHARACTER of lhe nelghborh0od or a deMmenf to nearby properties, ff granted, because: ~-~ ~-~ ,~.oq- use- o r~ T~ ~ 13~t. ~/~- (2) The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some me,od feasible for the app~cant to pu~ue, other ~an an area variance, because: ~ ~~ o; ~4 ~ (3) The amount of relief requested Is not substantial because: (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or. Impact on Ihe phydcat or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or dlshtcf because: '-i'J,~-~ ~ -~ (5) Has the vmlance been self-created? ( ~'~ Yes. or ( ) No. If not. is the consbuaflon existing, as built? ( ) Yes, or ( ) No. ~L~,s~- ~-~- c,~u~- (6) Additional Info,motion about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate fa the dlf~cutiy In meeting the code requirements: (attach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that Is necessar/and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safely, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on next page to apply V..~ ~ (Please consult your attorney.) notary area below. JOSEPH L TOWNSEND JR. Notary Public. State of New York Qual. Suffolk County No. 9366335 Commission Ex,)ires Feb 28, 20~)'~ / must submit Avthodzation from Owner) ~ App March 7, 2005 Dear Members of the Zoning Board, Please allow me this opportunity to describe the nature of the variance requesting. After ten long years of refining, changing, and re-structuring of the master plan for Hellenic Cabins and Snack Bar Inc., we have chosen to focus on the evolved needs of the Restaurant. For those of you who have been our patrons, especially during our summer season, flaws in the physical layout of the restaurant are obvious. In order to accommodate what is the most crucial time of the year for our business we need to create a general area where patrons could wait for a table, order take out and have easy access to the restrooms. Another imperative issue is to deal with the natural elements that affect our customers who choose to dine outdoors, i.e. mosquitoes, bees, blowing rain, and chilly evenings to, name a few. We needed to make changes around the heart of our restaurant, which is the kitchen that is opened into the dining room. Our proposed changes where met xvith welcome from the planning department, architectural review board, building department, and the department of transportation. The department of xvastewater management has already given us approval for the proposed seating. The only issue that surfaced recently was Article 8, Section 100-82 where Bulk Schedule requires a 100' front yard setback. When we applied a few years ago for a building permit to convert our canvas awning into a permanem roof, we were not required to apply for a variance. We are requesting four renovations that encroach on the front set back. Because of the original location of the restaurant, 3/4 of the building is xvithin the 100' front set back. Even though we were very cautious about not encroaching on the side set backs, we were unaware that any modifications to the building in the easterly direction would affect the from set back. We also assumed that a variance would not be necessary because one was not needed to create the roof over the existing outdoor patio. As shown · ..~ ~ on the survey in the left photo, expanding the building eastwardly 6.5' in the direction of our existing side entrance is incredibly important to us and crucial to the new customer flow. It is in line xvith the existing layout of the building and does not encroach on the side set back. We are also proposing to enclose our patio entirely with sliding patio doors. The sliders would provide necessary protection from the wind, rain, and insects. Enclosing the patio will not involve expanding its size in anyway. Because of the natural layout of the existing restaurant, the side entrance (East) and the front entrance (Northwest) cannot be relocated. The proposed roof over the Eastem and Northern walkways is strictly to provide some shelter to our customers from the rain and is not essential to the functionality of the new renovation. The taped off areas shown in the photograph below is of the front of the building and represents a visual dimension for a roof over the existing walkway. The picture below represents the side extension of the building, which includes the roof over the future walkway/handicap ramp that leads to the side entrance. As you survey our proposal, kindly consider the aforementioned needs of our business. We have served the North Fork for the past twenty-nine years and have done our best to keep up with the ever-changing evolution of our East End community. We ask that you expedite us in beautifying what some consider a landmark that has remained at a standstill since our initial request for approval to renovate ten years ago. LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS WEDNESDAY, MAY 4, 2005 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on Wednesday, May 4, 2005, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 1:10 PM JOHN and GEORGE GIANNARIS #5699. Request for a Variance under Section 100-82, based on the Building Department's February 24, 2005 Notice of Disapproval conceming proposed additions and alterations to existing restaurant within 100 feet of the front lot line along NYS Route 25. Location of Property: Hellenic Restaurant, 5145 Main Road, East Marion; CTM 35-2-14. Zone: Limited Business. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: April 11,2005. Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Board of Appeals April 13, 2005 Mr. Ronald C. Pfuhl Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Pfuhl: STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. I 1788-5518 Your March 31, 2005 Submission Hellenic Snack Bar Site Plans Dated 10/12/04, Last Revision 3/31/05 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-35-2-14 Our Case No. 04-84P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for reviexv. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: Any trees proposed along the Route 25 site frontage shall be placed in such a manner so that the mature width of the proposed trees will not impact or overhang the highway right-of-way. Site plan approval for highxvay work permit issuance is contingent upon our receipt of all of the following items within six (6) months of the date of this letter and no further revisions are made to the plans once we approve them. If the Highway Work Permit will be secured by anyone other than the property owner, i.e. contractor, the applicant must provide a signed letter from the property owner stating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of the property owner in this matter. The letter must also include the property owner's mailing address and telephone number. Kindly submit four sets of the revised plans, permit fee and surety bond (sample enclosed). It is also mandatory that protective liability insurance be provided by the permittee. This must be accomplished by submitting a completed Perm 17, Certificate of Insurance, in accordance with Option A (form enclosed), or by submitting the fee specified below to be covered under the NYSDOT Blanket Policy. Also enclosed is a Highway Work Permit Application to be completed and returned to us. The application, completed Perm 17 and the Surety Bond must be secured by the same party. Mr. Ronald C. Pfuhl April 13, 2005 Page 2 All checks issued to the State of New York must show a Federal Identification Number. Permit Fee (Payable to "State of New York"):$200.00 Bond Amount:S5,000.00 Insurance Fee: $150.00 or Perm 17 Questions concerning this matter should be directed to Mr. Mark Wolfgang at (631) 952-7973. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Please submit four sets of revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. V~rv t~[,~ yours~ , [~t SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety Attachments CC: Mr. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold ~rl Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Iown of Southold Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 · Main Road · East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 · Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDistrict@optonline.net March 30,2005 Bruno Semon Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Town of Southold, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon, Re: SCTM # 1000-35-2-14 After reviewing the enclosed site plan for the Hellenic Restaurant, the Chief of the East Marion Fire Department has recommended it be accepted as is. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Walter Gaipa / Fire District Secretary STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. i 1788-5518 March 8, 2005 Mr. George Giannaris Hellenic Restaurant Snack Bar 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Giannaris: Your February 28,200~ SuJ~mission Hellenic Snack Bar Site Plans Dated 10/12/04, Last Revision 2/10/05 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-35-2-14 Our Case No. 04-84P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Thank you for satisfactorily addressing the issue of cross access to the east. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: The full width of the Route 25 shoulder shall be re-constructed for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty-five (25) feet on each side of the driveway. Please show the limits on the plans along with the appropriate superpave specifications as follows: Top Course - 1-1/2", Item 402.098301M & Item 402.098311M Binder Course - 2-1/2", Item 402.198901M & Item 402.198911M Base Course - 6", Item 402.37890lM & Item 402.378911M All driveway material details shall be shown on the plans referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. The driveway dimensions shall be shown on the plans in conformance with the attached diagram. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Route 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILL/AM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOMON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD M~II.ING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 O~}]CE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 March 7, 2005 Mr. Walter Gaipa East Marion Fire District P.O. Box 131 East Marion, NY 11939 Dear Mr. Gaipa: RE: SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Enclosed is one final revised site plan dated October 12, 2004, for Hellenic Restaurant. The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and for your recommendations as to whether any firewells are needed. Please specify whether firewells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Bruno Semon Sr. Site Plan Reviewer eric. FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL . DATE: February 24, 2005 TO: Hellenic Cabins & Snack Bar Inc. PO Box 506 East Marion, NY 11939 Please take notice that your application dated January 28, 2005 For permit to make additions and alterations to an existing restaurant at Location of property: 5145 Main Road, East Marion County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 35 Block2 Lot 1.~4 . FEB 2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this conforming 1.2 acre parcel in the Limited Business (LB) District, is not permitted pursuant to Article VIII, Section 100-82, which states; "Except as otherwise provided herein, no buildings or premises shall be used and no building or part thereof shall be erected or altered in the LB District unless the same conforms to the Bulk Schedule and Parking and Loading Schedules incorporated into this chapter by reference, with the same force and effect as if such regulations were set forth herein in full." Bulk Schedule requires a minimum fi-ont yard setback of 100 feet. Following the proposed construction, the building will have a front yard setback of 22.64 feet. Authot:i~ol ,qi~ature CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. Submission Without a Cover Letter FEB I 5 2005 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR GEORGE D. SOLOHON PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot, Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Febmary2,2005 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mrs. Moore: Re: Hellenic Snack Bar Main Road, East Marion SCTM #1000-35-2-14 Zone: LB/R-80 The above site plan applic~tfon/w_as reviewed at the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) meeting held on Jafiu .a~ 25, 2005. A copy of the meeting minutes is enclosed. Please review the pertinent comments and inform us in writing if you are in agreement with the conditions. In addition, if required, please modify the site/construction plan, and submit the revisions to the Planning Board. If there are any questions, please contact me at (631) 765-1938 ext. 229 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs: ARC minutes checklist MATToA-MAR BY THE BAY (First Street- New Suffolk) SCTM# 1000-122-6- 29.3/ Moved by Ron McGreevy and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting visual representation of the boat racks and information about the exterior lighting and signage. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HILDRETHS DEPARTMENT STORE (Main Road - Mattituck) SCTM#1000-122- 6-29.3 Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Ron McGreevy, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting complete elevations to agree with the site plan, colors, roof shingle material as well as the other information on the ARC checklist. The applicant is asked to consider treatments to break up the expanse of the roofs, possibly dormers as on the buildings to the west. Vote of the Committee: Ayes all. HELLENIC SNACKBAR (Main Road - East Marion) SCTM#1000-35-2-14) Moved by Herbert Ernest and seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting the information on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayesall. ~'_o,,,2~ ~-¢> /~ DAVID ROSE PERENNIALS (5645 Aldrich Lane - Mattituck SCTM#1000-120-3- 11.12 Moved by Herbert Ernest/and seconded by Robert .F, eith, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the SIGNAGE as submitted. Vote of the Committee: -..Ayes All. Applicants are reminded that deviations from approved plans without the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee will cause recission of the original approval and may negatively impact upon securing the Certificate of Occupancy. STANLEY MALLON BUILDING (32845 Main Road - Cutchogue) SCTM#1000- 97-5-4.5 Moved by Robert Keith and seconded by Herbert Ernest, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the APPLICATION awaiting a response to the Committee's comments of June 3, 2003 and the items on the ARC checklist. Vote of the Committee: Ayes All. The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. Robert W. Keith Secretary RECOmmENDED CHECKLIST FOR .kRCHITECTURAL REVIEV~' COMMITTEE ,3d'tel' the Planning Board staff' notifies you m writing ti)al your apptication is acceptable. fl~¢ rdevant infmmation on the check list below should be submitted to the Cotmnittce. all at one time, and tlu:ough the Plmining Board sti~ff. If you wish to have your samples returned, pleas~ note tiffs on the envelope. 1. Site Plan 2. Floor plans, drawn to scale (t 4" to l'prcfcrrcd) by a licensed arclfit¢cl (n engineer (design professional) showing the type of construction, proposed occupancy or use and the location of fire protection walls. 3. Elevation drawings to scale (also '.f' to l'} of all sides of each building prepared by a design professiomt 4. [ itc l)pc ahd color of thc items that iollows are to be shm,,n on the th,t~xmgs, l'lease include samples where appropriate. ~ ' Roofing Siding Windows, doors and trim Exterinr heating, cooling equipment such as heat pumps and ail' conditioning equipment. Also show their locations. Roof mounted mechanical equipment. Roof and sidcwaJl penetrations for plmnbing and mcchan/cal equipmcm Also indicale the their locations and material. Masomy malerial for clfimneys or accen~ walls. Also proxide samples or i*hoto~'aphs. Ornamentation, aw~fings, canopies or tents. Also p~ovide details and st) lc.. Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- 35~ 2 ~ I~ Comments: January 25, 2005 Dear Members of the Southold Town Planning Board, This letter of intent is to inform you ora recent change in direction that we have taken for the project at the Hellenic Cabins and Snack Bar. Due to parking restrictions and failure to negotiate a long-term lease with the Suffolk County water authority for the leased parking lot adjacent to the east of us, we have decided to postpone the constxuction of the cottages as approved in our previous site plan. We would like to focus on the fundamental needs of the restaurant at this time. Please review the amended site plan and kindly consider our requests to expand the restaurant. Our changes will help facilitate our customers as well as provide a better workflow for our staff. J6hn Giaunaris Owner Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: SCTM#: 1000- Date: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMEP~ KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD bl~lLrNG ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OF~'ICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 Janua~ 3,2005 Mr. George Giannarias 780 Gold Spur Street Cutchogue, NY 11935 Dear Mr. Giannarias: Re: Proposed site plan for Hellenic Restaurant 5145 NYS Road 25, East Marion SCTM#1000-35-2~14 Zone: LB The Planning Board held a work session on November 17, 2004 at which the revised site plan materials submitted on November 9, 2004 were reviewed. The Board determined that the application package is incomplete. Because the proposed scope has changed since your previous submission for a hotel, we ask that you provide the following information and return it to the Planning Department for review: 1. Letter indicating the current intent f5r the 10-unit hotel application 2. Completed site plan application (enclosed) for the expanded restaurant 3. Completed Environmental Assessment Form Part I (enclosed) 4. Please submit information noted on the attached Architectural Review Committee checklist You are also advised to apply for NYS Department of Transportation and Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services approval as soon as possible. These approvals are a prerequisite to final approval by the Planning Board. Mr. George Giannarias January 3, 2005 Page Two If you have any questions, please contact me at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday. Senior Site Plan Reviewer encs. MARION FIRE DIST CT Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 · Main Road - East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 · Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: £MFDist dct@optonline.net December 30, 2004 Re: Hellenic Restaurant Brtmo Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer Town of Southold PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon, The Chief of the East Marion Fire Department has reviewed the Landscape and Alignment Plan as submitted and has no objections as presented. Fire District Secretary J,,',N - 3 2005 STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONI 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWA'~ HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 DEC 2 9 December 21, 2004 Mr. George Oiannaris Hellenic Restaurant Snack Bar 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead. NY 11901 Dear Mr. Giannaris: Your November 15, 2004 Submission Hellenic Snack Bar Site Plans Dated 10/12/04 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-35-2-14 Our Case No. 04-84P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Thank you for satisfactorily addressing the issue of cross access to the west. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: Your previous submission included combined development of both this parcel and the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) parcel (15.1) on the east side, which included access on the east side of the property. The new site plan submitted at this time does not include any development on the SCWA parcel and substantially reduces the total development proposed. The SCWA parcel currently has its own access to Route 25. We previously noted that sight distance at the proposed eastern entrance is limited due to the horizontal curvature of Route 25 and we were considering approval of that as an ingress only based on the operational need for that access point. The plan you submitted does not indicate there is an operational need for that access point. The proposed western location for ingress and egress will sufficiently service this site. In keeping with our access management policy, as well as our Policy and Standards for the Design of Entrances to State Highways, which states that normally only one access to a parcel shall be permitted we recommend removal of the east access point. Cross access to the adjacent SCWA parcel should be addressed at a location further north within the property. Please have the plans revised to show all ingress and egress from the western access point and removal of the east ingress. We recommend that tree located along the site frontage be removed so all the sidewalk is located on public property. The tree is a potential hazard, with a large leader overhanging both of the Route 25 travel lanes and should be removed as part of the work at this location. Mr. George Giannaris December 21, 2004 Page 2 The utility pole//62 shall be re-located so the sidewalk is uniform across the property frontage. Please revise the plans to show the new pole location and the sidewalk continuing uniformly across the Route 25 site frontage. Any trees proposed along the Route 25 site frontage shall be placed in such a manner so that the mature width of the proposed trees will not impact or overhang the highway right-of-way. Consideration should be given to extend the proposed evergreen tree line along the west side of the property to minimize the accumulation of wind driven snow on the highway. The full width of the Rotae 25 shoulder shall be re-constructed for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty-five (25) feet on each side of the driveway. Please show the limits on the plans along with the appropriate superpave specifications as follows: Top Course - 1-1/2", Item 402.098301M & Item 402.098311M Binder Course - 2-I/2", Item 402.198901M & Item 402.198911M Base Course - 6", Item 402.378901M & Item 402.378911M All driveway, sidewalk, sidewalk pedestrian ramps and curb material details shall be shown on the plans referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be constructed with a detectable warning field. Please provide us with an engineers cost estimate for all work required within the Route 25 highway right-of-way so we can determine the bond requirement for this site. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. 10. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Rotae 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." 1l. The plan must include the note "Repair existing shoulder, sidewalk and curbing as ordered by State Engineer." 12. A note shall be added to the plans stating which consecutive reference markers the site falls between or the reference markers shall be shown on the plan. 13. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. You may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP) applications. Please be Mr. George Giannaris December 21, 2004 Page 3 advised that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit four sets of revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. V~ery truly. 3g!urs, , .~i iL I~ .... ,~ .... SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety CC: ~[i Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Mr. Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin @youngengineering. corn HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect DOUGLAS E. ADA&IS, Professional Engineer December 17, 2004 ATTN: Mr. Bruno Semon, Planner Town of Southold Planning Department P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 RE: HELLENtC RESORT & RESTAURANT At East Marion, T/O Southold, New York (03-0421) Dear Mr. Semon: Enclosed is one (1) copy of the Health Department Site Plan last dated January 7, 2003 bearing the SCDHS stamp of approval to construct dated February 18, 2003. Also enclosed is one (1) copy of the Health Department As-Built Survey dated June 23, 2003 bearing the SCDHS stamp of approval of constructed works dated July 11, 2003. These documents are forwarded for your review and file, pursuant to the request of Mr. George Giannaris. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Thomas C. Wolpert, P.E. TCW/cvh Encl. cc: Mr. George Giannaris + i Copy Each Plan Planning Engineering Land Surveying Architecture PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Choir RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cot. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 November 17, 2004 Mr. Walter Gaipa Secretary/Treasurer East Marion Fire District P.O. Box 131 E. Marion, NY 11939 Dear Mr. Gaipa: RE: Hellenic Restaurant Enclosed is a copy of the Landscape & Alignment Plan prepared for the above- referenced project for your review. Senior Site Plan Reviewer Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H, SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave,) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 765-1938 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: Michael Verity, Principal Building inspector From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~__--__--_~ Date: November 17, 2004 Re: Hellenic Restaurant Enclosed is a copy of the Landscape & Alignment Plan prepared for the above- referenced project for your review. .' Enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 OFFICE LOCATION: Town Hall Annex 54375 State Route 25 (cor. Main Rd. & Youngs Ave.) Southold, NY Telephone: 631 Fax: 631 765-3136 MEMORANDUM To: James Richter, Town Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Date: November 17, 2004 Re: Hellenic Restaurant Enclosed is a copy of the Landscape & Alignment Plan prepared for the above- referenced project for your review. Enc. YOUNG & YOUNG 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, New York 11901 Telephone 631-727-2303 Facsimile 631-727-0144 admin COyoungengineering. com HOWARD W. YOUNG, Land Surveyor THOMAS C. WOLPERT, Professional Engineer ROBERT C. TAST, Architect RONALD E. PFUHL, Landscape Architect DOUGLAS E. ADAMS, Professional Engineer October 15, 2004 Mr. George Giannaris Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 ~ Road East Marion, New York 11939 RE: Dear ~r. Giannaris: Enclosed are ten dated Octok- Ifyo~ Proposed Restaurant Expansion HELLENIC SNACK BAR At East Marion, T/O Southold, New York (04-0532) ~n and Details (Sheets 1-3) -hatter, please contact us. V yours, . ~l, L.A. REP/cvh Encl. Planning Engineering Architecture Submission Without a Cover Letter Sender: Subject: scm#: ~ooo- ad-~-/x/ Date: ¢/X q/C¥ Colllltlellt $: SEP 2 9 2004 Southold Town Plarmin[l Boar,~ · q~lN~ BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: May 27, 2004 James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Site Plan Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road, East Marion Zoning District LB & R-80 SCTM# 1000-35-2-14, & 15.1 Status: DOT letter for your review. Required Return Date: Not ready for approval. In reference to the above, attached you will find information on the site plan. Thank you in advance. cc: file Eric.: 1 letter dated May 11, 2004 from NYS DOT STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-551B May 11, 2004 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your March 29, 2004 Submission Hellenic Snack Bar Site Plans Dated 3/10/03, Last Revision 3/22/04 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-35-2-14, 15.1 Our Case No. 04-§4P This is in regard to the site plans for the referenced project which were submitted to us for review. Prior to an approval of the site's access and issuance of a New York State Highway Work Permit, the following items must be addressed: In recent years, many states have employed access management as a major technique to address conflicts between through traffic and that generated by developments. The goals of access management are to limit the number of access points, separate conflict points and remove turning traffic from through movements. New York State is utilizing this technique to minimize impacts to State highways. We recommend, therefore, that cross access to this site be obtained from adjacent properties. If this is not presently possible, it should be shown on the plans for implementation as part of future redevelopment. Sight distance at the eastern entrance is limited due to the horizontal curvature of Route 25. We recommend that the access points be designed and constructed for one way use, with the east access used for ingress only and the west access for egress only. Please reference our Policy and Standards manual on our ~vebsite C~, ~wwv.dot.state.ny.us/traffic/oper/permits/hwp/dwpolind.pdf to provide the correct design. Both sides of each entrance shall be signed with back to back R3-10C and R3-1 lC one- way signs. The full width of the Route 25 shoulder shall be re-constructed for a minimum of the driveway width plus twenty-five (25) feet on each side of the driveway. Please shoxv the limits on the plans along with the appropriate superpave specifications as follows: Top Course - l-1/2", Item 402.098301M & Item 402.098311M Binder Course - 2-1/2", Item 402.198901M & Item 402.19891 IM Base Course - 6", Item 402.378901M & Item 402.378911M Mr. Thomas C. Wolpea May Il, 2004 Page 2 All driveway, sidewalk and curb material details shall be shown on the plans referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers. Sidewalk pedestrian ramps shall be constructed with a detectable waming field. Please provide us with an engineers cost estimate for all work required within the Route 25 highway right-of-way so we can determine the bond requirement for this site. A note shall be added to the plans requiring the contractor to clean existing drainage basins along and immediately adjacent to the Route 25 site frontage at the completion of construction. A Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan must be provided for work on Route 25. The plan must include the note "All lanes must be open to traffic before 9 AM and after 3 PM. No lane closings are permitted on weekends or holidays. Nighttime lane closings will not be permitted without prior approval from the State Permit Inspector." A note shall be added to the plans stating which consecutive reference markers the site falls between or the reference markers shall be shown on the plan. Any utility work proposed in State Highway right-of-way will require separate application and submission of plans (installation details, restoration details and Maintenance and Protection of Traffic plan - all referenced to NYSDOT specification item numbers and the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) to our Riverhead Maintenance facility. The applicant may contact Mr. Kevin Matthaei at (631) 727-1731 for further directions regarding Utility Highway Work Permit (HWP)applications. The applicant should be made aware that utility HWP issuance is subject to issuance of the HWP required for site work. Please submit four sets of revised plans. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Kindly refer to the subject case number and County tax map number in all correspondence. Very truly yours, Original Signed By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety cc: yx. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold vms. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold SAS:MW:DW PLANNING ]BOARD MEMB~S JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO ~VILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Ha]l, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 April 26, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re; East Marion Fire District Letter for Site Plan of Hellenic Snack Bar Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, Enclosed you will find a copy of the letter dated April 8, 2004 from the East Marion Fire District. , Please review the enclosed letter and respond i ~ writing if in agreement with the request. Please revise the site plan as required based on the comments of the Fire District. Submit the revised site plan to the Planning Board for review; we will need the revision to continue the site plan process. Please expedite the submittal information so we can process this application further. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken PoIiwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Board of Trustees April 19, 2004 Proposed amended site plan for Hellenic Snack Bar SCTM#35-2-14 & 15.1 2 0 Southofd Town 8oar~ The Southold Town Board of Trustees reviewed the application submitted by the Hellenic Snack Bar and determined the proposed construction to be out of the Wetland jurisdiction under Chapter 97 of the Town Wetland Code and Chapter 37 of the Town Code. If you require any further information, please don't hesitate to contact the office. SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY April 14, 2004 Bruno Semon Town of Southold planning Board PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Re: SCTM #: 1000-35-2-14, & 15.1 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, New York 11769 (631) 589-5200 Fax (631) 589-5268 Project Name: Hellenic Snack Bar (Hotel & Restaurant) Location: 5145 Main Road East Marion, N.Y. Dear Mr. Semon: The Suffolk County Water Authority(SCWA) has received your agency referral letter that requests comments on the above referenced project. The SCWA suggests that the applicable topics on the enclosed checklist be addressed as part of the environmental review for this project. Where appropriate, the Planning Board should incorporate the mitigative measures as covenants and restrictions on the project if it is approved. Please keep us apprised of this project. If you have any questions concerning our comments, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 631-563-0306. Sincerely, Sr. Environmental Analyst Enclosure H:XPineBXSCWA Dev Review\southold_agency_referrraLrequest.wpd Environmental Review Checklist Water Resources (Groundwater) 1. Location and description of aquifers and recharge areas a. quality b. quantity c. seasonal variation d. depth to water table 2. Identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater private water supply public water supply location of existing wells agricultural uses commercial/Industrial uses seasonal variation Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing land use and zoning a. description of thc existing land use of thc project site and thc surrounding area b. description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area c. description of any affected agricultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site 2. Description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area a. Southold Master Plan b. Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Strategy c. Special Groundwater Protection Area Plan Public Water Service 1. Existing facilities 2. Current usage levels 3. Projected future usage levels 4. Projected future facilities Significant Environmental Impacts - Identify those aspects identified in above Items A. B. and C., that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action including cumulative impacts as measured against Southold Water Supply Management and Watershed Protection Strategy and provide discussion. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impacts - Describe mitigative measures to reduce or avoid potential adverse impacts identified in Item D. Mitigative measures include, but are not limited to: 1. Clustering developmant. 2. Limiting clearing to retain maximum undisturbed recharge areas. 3. Conserving open space and placing conservation easements to protect these areas. The project should be designed in context of adjoining areas to maintain unfragmented, contiguous open space to maximize thc benefit of these areas both ecologically and in terms of watershed protection. 4. Limiting fertilizer dependent vegetation to minimize turf areas. 5. Using native plants for landscaping purposes that require less water and arc more drought tolerant. 6. Preserving existing native vegetation to the maximum extent practical keeping in mind realistic accessory uses that will likely occur (ic; sheds, pools). A conservation easement should be placed on the preserved area so it is not disturbed for accessory uses. 7. Using natural stormwatcr management practices (grass swales, filter strips, created wetlands, etc), where possible. 8. Only installing ornamental water features that recycle water. Signs should indicate that water is recycled. These water features should not be operated during a drought. 9. Using porous pavements, and/or minimizing road widths to thc extent practical, while still allowing adequate emergency access. 10. Requiring the use of landscape methods that minimize recharge of contaminants. F. Identify adverse environmental effects that cannot be avoided if the projcct is implemented RICHARD J. LAVALL£, P.E~. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CHARLES J. BARTHA, P.E. April 13, 2O04 Town of Southold Planning Department PO Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Proposed Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road, East Marion SCTM #1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Gentlemen: This Department has reviewed the above-referenced site plan. Specifically note that: This Department has no objection to the Town assuming lead agency status for this proposed development. If you have any questions, kindly contact this office at 852-4100. William S. Shannon, P.E. Chief Engineer ~.'Pa~pa~*~Ola Director of Highway Planning & P~-nits WSS/MPC/dm (6Sl)852-4010 335 YAPHANK AVENUE FAX (6~l)852-41SO E~ST MARION FIRE DIST~CT Board of Fire Commissioners PO Box 131 · Main Road · East Marion, NY 11939 (631) 477-0163 - Fax (631) 477-8310 Email: EMFDist rict @optonlme.net April 8, 2004 Mr. Bruno Semon, Sr. Site Plan Reviewer Planning Board Town of Southold, PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Semon, - 20~0404 The Board of Fire Commissioners, in consultation with the Chief of the Fire Department, have made the following requests in regard to the three projects sent to us for our review. Gala Holistlc Circle~ Shipyard Lane~ East Marion- 1 ) Drawing C1 .O-three locations for fire hydrants 2) Request fire access to the marina area for fire protection Hellenic Snack Bar~ Main Rd. East Marion 1) Hydrant location at west entrance Cove Beach EstatesI Main Rd. East Marion 1) Drawing #1-one electdc well location 2) Drawing #3-three electric well locations Please contact us if further information is required. Thank you very much for requesting our input. Walter Gaipa / Fire District Secretary STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 250 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, N.Y. 11788-5518 Town April 7, 2004 Mr. Thomas C. Wolpert Young & Young 400 Ostrander Avenue Riverhead, NY 11901 Dear Mr. Wolpert: Your March 29, 2004 Submission Hellenic Snack Bar Site Plans Dated 3/10/03, Last Revision 3/22/04 Route 25, East Marion SCTM 1000-35-2-14, 15.1 Our Case No. 04-84P This is to acknowledge receipt of your submission on the above permit application. This permit application should be sensitive to the unique visual and historic setting of the Long Island North Shore Heritage Area, which runs from the Queens/Nassau County line to Orient Point, and from Route 25 or I495, whichever is farther south, north to Long Island Sound. In all future correspondence, please refer to the subject case number. The plans must also include the County tax map number. Review of the subject material is being coordinated by Mr. Mark Wolfgang. He can be contacted at (631) 952-7973 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Please send all correspondence to his attention. Thank you for your cooperation concerning this matter. Very truly yours, Original Signed By SHAIK A. SAAD, P.E. Civil Engineer III Traffic Engineering and Safety CC: ~r. Peter Harris, Superintendent of Highways, Town of Southold s. Valerie Scopaz, Planning Director, Town of Southold Wendy Brodsky, Administrative Assistant, Long Island North Shore Heritage Area Planning Commission SAS:MW:DW SITE PLAN USE DETERMINI Initial Determination _~c~c °ate: Request: (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial Determination as to whether use is permitted: ~ [% ,~,N~iJ13~.. (~L~-.~ ~00[~ - ~ Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~, Signature of Building Inspector Planning Department Referral: Date Sent: ¢¢/~//~ ~ Date Received: ~ 8~na~f Planning Dap{. ~aff ~eviewer Final Determination Date: Decision: Signature of Building Inspector FOR INTERNAL USE ONLYe~ ~z',"-~ ~.~,.~F' Initial Determ,natlon ~[c ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ (Note: Copy of Building Permit Application and supporting documentation as to proposed use or uses should be submitted.) Initial,Determination as to, whether use is permitted: .... ~. - . Initial Determination as to whether site plan is required:~t~ S~natum of ~uildi~ Inspoctor Planning Depadment Referral: Date Sent: Date Received: Comments: Date of Comment: Final Determination Date: Decision: Signature of Planning Dept. Staff Reviewer Signature of Building Inspector REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE Name: ~TLqE)~ Telephone: Mailing Address: "/~So ~OL~ Et~ ~,]-' Cu~.~C j N~/ /1~ ~- SCTM# of site you are inquiring about: Query: /'~.E~l¢ ~L-~'~-~k/l- [,~-Pu~u (Please be specific about the information you need. Provide supporting documentation - surveys, maps, sketches - where possible.) For Office Use Only: Routed to: PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 April 5, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Moore: Re: Scheduled A.R.C. Meeting GAIA Holistic aka Oki-Do; Greenport Heights, Hellenic Hotel SCTM# 1000-38-7-7.1; 45-04-3.1; 35-2-14, 15.1 Zone: LI This letter is to inform you that the above-listed site plan applications are set for the Architect Review Committee (ARC) meeting on April 15, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. in the Southold Town Hall Conference Room. Attached is an ARC checklist for your use in preparation for the meeting. Please submit all materials that need to be presented to the ARC before the- meeting date or bring the materials with you to the meeting. Please inform us in advance if you will not be ready for the meeting date. If there are any questions, you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Respectfully yours, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer att. cc: file PAGE OZ YOUNG & YOUNG 400 O~r~e~ A~,mt l~iwrh#m~ ~re~o York 11~I HOWA~ ~ YOUNG, l~nd.q~r~r THO~S C. ~r P~iond ROBOT C T~ A~bi~t RONA~ E. P~HL, ~capt DOUG~ E. ~5, ~ssio~l FAX TRANSMITTAL Telephoto 6M-727-230S Fac~iraik 831-727-0144 ~lmi#~j~mng~a~4m~rtmg. DATE: TO: ATTN: FAX 4/: FROM: SUBJECT: NO. OF PAGES: April 5, 2004 Town of Southold Bruno (631) 765-3136 Howard W. Youn9 Hellenic Resort & Restaurant 3 (Including Cover Sheet} Please see partial copy of Health Department Site Plan last dated January 7, 2003, to follow as requested. ~ANITARY DESIGN CRITERIA &eCULAT1ON$ SANItARy DESION AJ,,L0WAJgLE ~AN)TAPY H-Ow {DIENSllW) VI~JNG VFJUNG PAGE 02 ~ ENGINEER'S CERlllqCATION '~ / C(~INTT [~P,I~TIdE~T (~ KE~.TH ~)eYK~eSj~J~J~1~lll~i---~r(~. I tM SURVEYOR'S CER1)FiCATION JOHN GIAN NAI~,S HE.NIghT & ~AUR~T At East ~ Town of S~thol~ CounW T~~O ~ PLANNING BOA.RD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 5, 2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Pat: Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 35-2-14, 15.1 After having reviewed the above files, enclosed are the following extra maps: Date of Map Date Received # of copies Rev. Mar. 3, 2003 July 30, 2003 6 Rev. Mar. 3, 2003 Sept. 2, 2003 1 Rev. Dec. 12, 2002 Jan. 13, 2003 2 July 20, 2001 July 31, 2001 4 Dec. 5, 2000 Dec. 15, 2000 1 Rev. Nov. 18, 1997 Dec. 14, 1998 4 Sincerely, Bruno Semon Senior Site Plan Reviewer JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O~_~o:~x~l 179 Town Hall, ~3095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 2, 2004 Ms. Cynthia Goldsmith, Secretary East Marion Fire District P.O. Box 131 East Madon, New York 11939 Dear Ms. Goldsmith: Enclosed please find one (1) site plan last revised March 22, 2004, for Hellenic Snack Bar, located approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New State Road 25, East Marion, New York. SCTM#.f1000-35-2-14, 15.1 "The enclosed site plan is being referred to you for fire access review and your recommendations as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether fire wells are shallow or electric. O The enclosed subdivision is being referred to you for your recommendation as to whether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether fire wells are shallow or electric. Thank you for your cooperation. Very~.truly yours, Bruno Semon Sr. Site Plan Reviewer enc. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. $IDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM Date: April 2, 2004 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Agency Referral Request $outhold Town Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Clerk for Southold Town Board Josh Horton, Southold Town Supervisor Southold Town Board of Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U.S. Army Corp of Engineers 4' New York State Department of Transportation *Suffolk County Water Authority '*Suffolk County Planning Department Suffolk County Department of Public Works From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Proposed amended site plan for the Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road, East Marion Zoning District LB & R-80 SCTM# 1000-35-2-14, & 15.1 Dear Reviewer: Status: New revised Active Amended Site Plan. The above listed action and site plan is referred to your agency for review, comments, concerns, permits requirements and jurisdiction. Attached is a copy of the site plan application information for your review. This amended site plan is for new construction of 10 hotel units in five new buildings with decks and proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519 acres parcel in the LB, R-80 Zone(s) located at approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New State Road 25 in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-35.-2-14, 1000- 35.-2-15.1 Please respond on your agencies position of the above action. Thank you in advance. cc: File *Maps are enclosed for your review PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town I{al), 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-3 }.36 Telephone (516) 765- 1938 Date Received Date Complet:ed Filing Fee New Change of Use Re-use Ex~ension __Revision of Approved Site Plan Name of Business or Site: Loc2~lon: Address: Name of Applicant:. Address of Applicant:: Telephone: Owner of Land: Agent or Person responsible for appllcaOon: Address: Telephone: Site plans prepared by: License No.: Address: Telephone: FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE ' JAN 1 Pa~e 2 Planning ~]oard Sll:e Plan ADDIIcat~on APPLICANTS AFFIDAvIT SI'ATE OF NEW YORK COUN"P/OF SUFFOlk //~,//'~/~../~ ~/'~'/~,6W ~ being dU'y sworn, deposes and Says ~a: he resides at in the S~te ~ New Yom. and maybe JS~ ~e above prope~, or thane is the (Title} 4 (Specify whemer Par~lerShlp or Cgrp.} which is hereby making application; thai: there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; ?.ha(: the title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, has been clearly established and is shown on said Plan; that no parc of the Plan infringes upon any duly filecl plan which has not been abandoned both as 1:o lois and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and regutaDons adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submi~ed, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and tha~: the actual physical improvements will be installed in si:rid: accordance with the plans submitted.' Signed (Partner or Corporate OffJ~r ~nd Sworn to me this day of fNotarv PubliC) MELI88A MoGOWAN Public, 8late of Ne~ Y~ No, 4995915 Ouallfted In Suffolk Cou~ ~. ~lmml~lon ~ May ~ ~ Page 5 Planning Board Site Plan Appllca:lon ~2, ~.~/~', Total Land Area of Site (acres or square feet) Zoning District Existing Use of Site P~posed Uses on Site. Show all uses propo~d and exi~ing. Indicate which Duildlng will have which use. ff more than one use Is proposed per building, indicate square foo~ge ~ floor area that will be rese~ed per use. Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) /~/~.~ .¢~.~ Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) 0Lc~¢c~-'~,¢ Percent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) Percent of Lot for Landscaping (where applicable) Has applicant been granted a vadance and/or special exception by(~¢24¢/:~=~,/5 Board of Appeals - Case # & date Board of Trustees - Case # & date NY State Department of Environmental Conservation - Case # & date Suffolk County Department Health SE, vices - Case # & date ~/0. Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Other Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? If so, have proper permits been ob~ained? Name of Issuing agency Number and date of permit Issued. NO ACT/ON (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF £/TE PLAN BY PLANNING BOARD. VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO PROSECUTION. Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLENIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Long EAF, Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to primary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District in. clude the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Health DepartmEfit Site Plan last dated December 12, 2002 indicates the following dimensions: Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Variance Reouired Units 1 & 2 26.43' N.A. N.A. N.A. Units 3 & 4 N.A. 10.99' N.A. Side Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. 12.05' N.A. Side Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A. 20.00' Rear Yard Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 23.64' Rear Yard Page 2 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 Descrintion of Existinff and Pronosed Site Use. etc. Existinff Site Use. etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for 5 of the 17 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 15 feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, 1 residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 10 unit motel complex. The proposed structures include retaining-the existing restaurant and 10 new motel units in 5 buildings. ,The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the v. iotel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 10.99 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20.00 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 6,300 gpd (10 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 7,000 gpd. Informational Details and Water Su~)nlv Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. O Page 3 Revised: January 8, 2003 March 7, 2002 4. A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 16, 2002). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April2,2004 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Snack Bar Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, We are in receipt of the new site plans submitted on March 24, 2004 and have done a preliminary review. It appears the project has changed from the ~3rtginal proposed project and for this reason it must be reviewed as proposed. The site plan application file must reflect the changes in the current proposed project. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed any further: l) Please provide us with a square foot number to support the existing buildings and the new construction, this can be submitted in letterform. 2) Submit construction plans and materials for the ARC committee. 3) The site plan will require the following approvals before PB Final Approval: SCHD, NYS DOT, Fire Department, A.R.C. SCWA approval of build out and Southold Town Building Department. Please make preparations to get these approvals. To avoid delays in approval, we recommend that an application for disapproval be submitted to the Building Department. Please expedite the submittal information so we can process this application further. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resvapl ours, ~/'-B/~S- '~enlor SS1/re P~I~ Reviewer ~ CC:file, pb PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 Date: April 2, 2004 To: James A. Richter, R.A., Engineer From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer Re: Site Plan Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road, East Marion Zoning District LB & R-80 SCTM# 1000-35-2-14, & 15.1 Status: New revised Active Site Plan with a ZBA appeal # 5019. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, atta~;hed you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of the site. Please review for comments, concerns and approval. This amended site plan is for new construction of 10 hotel units in five new buildings with decks and proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519 acres parcel in the LB, R-80 Zone(s) located at approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New State Road 25 in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-35.-2-14, 1000- 35.-2-15.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Howard Young dated November 10, 2003 and last revised March 22, 2004. PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ JERILYN B. WOODHOUSE Chair RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Date: Apdl 2, 2004 To: From: Re: Michael Verity, Principal Building Inspector Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~'~ Site Plan Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road, East Marion Zoning District LB & R-80 SCTM# 1000-35-2-14, & 15.1 Status: New revised Active Site Plan with a ZBA appeal # 5019. Required Return Date: ASAP In reference to the above, attached you will find a site plan. The Site Plan reflects the current proposed build out of this site. Please review for comments, concerns and certification, tt appears this is different then the plan reviewed under the amended disapproval dated March 3, 2003 by your department. This amended site plan is for new construction of 10 hotel units in five new buildings with decks and proposed addition to the existing restaurant to 250 seats on 1.519 acres parcel in the LB, R-80 Zone(s) located at approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New State Road 25 in East Marion. SCTM#(s) 1000-35.-2-14, 1000- 35.-2-15.1 Site Plan Enclosed is for your records and does not need to be returned to the Planning Board. Please advise the applicant or us if this site plan will be required to be submitted to your department for a formal review. Thank you in advance. cc: file Enc.: 1 Site plan prepared by Howard Young dated November 10, 2003 and last revised March 22, 2004. 473889 SOUTHOLD opNYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SCt RCLS 421 RESTAUP~T 35.-2-14 5145 MAIN ND = OWNER & MAILING INFO .... MISC GI~NNARIS JOHN & ORS C/Oi~A GIi~ARIAS 1 PO BOX 506 BANK EAST I~a~RION NY 11939 DATE : 04/02/2004 ROLL SEC TABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 04 I===- .... = ..... ASSESSMENT DATA ........... I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 3,200 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 13,100 COUNTY 13,100 **PRIOR** TOWN 13,100 ILAND 3,200 SCHOOL 13,100 ITOTAL 18,500 ==DIMENSIONS ===1 ....... SALES INFORMATION .................................. ACRES 1.25 IBOOK i SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 00030 PR OWNER ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ..... CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IF D026 IPK065 IWW020 I SW011 Fi=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU 473889 SOUTHOLD 35.-2-15.1 5275 ~IN RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO SUFFOLK COUNTY W2~TER AUTHORITY 4060 SUNRISE H~ OAKDALE NY 11769 NYSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SCi 822 WATER SUPPLY .... MISC RS-SS 8 BANK DATE : 04/02/2004 ROLL SEC WHOLLY EXM TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 04 I .............. ASSESSMENT DATA ........... I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 2,700 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 5,200 COUNTY **PRIOR** TOWN ILAND 2,700 SCHOOL ITOTAL 5,200 ==DIMENSIONS ===1 ....... SALES INFORMATION .................................. ACRES 16.94 IBOOK 11872 SALE DATE 12/29/97 SALE PRICE IPAGE 776 PR OWNER VILLAGE OF GREENPORT ....... TOTAL EXEMPTIONS I ............. I== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE 13890 5,200 02 I FD026 ~PK065 IWW020 ISW011 FI=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU 0 0 0 600,000 VALUE PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (63l) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 March 23, 2004 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Sou~hold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Resort and Restaurant Dear Chairman and Board members: Young & Young has prepared the detailed site plan of the Hellenic hotel and restaurant, enclosed are 8 prints for your review. In is a revised applicant has restaurant in the restaurant the restaurant circulation seating is accordance with your previous request, enclosed SEQRA Long EAF for your review. The shown a needed improvement to the this site plan. The existing bathrooms in need to be relocated and the entrance to will be reconfigured to permit better inside the restaurant. No additional proposed only internal relocation of space. cc: Mr. George Giannaris LANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SlDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 October 20, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, We are in receipt and have reviewed your letter dated September 10, 2003. This letter is to inform you we have not received the information requested on our letter dated September 4, 2003. We agree the project has changed fi.om the original proposed project and for this reason it must be reviewed as proposed. The site plan application file must reflect and include the paperwork, which corresponds to the changes on the current proposed project. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed any further: 1) Submit revised site plan copies meeting the requirement of Southold Town Code. Please update the survey to include all the requirements of a site plan. 2) Submit an updated long EAF form for review on the new configuration of the proposed site plan. 3) Submit construction plans and materials for the ARC committee. Please expedite the submittal information so we can process this application. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Resp~,~ y /~3run~t~on Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file, pb PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: September 26, 2003 To: Planning Board Members and Valerie Scopaz-~ From: Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Review~/'~) Re: Site Plan SEQRA of Hellenic Hotel Restaurant Main Road East Marion, NY SCTM: 100(~'~-14 &~ '-'-/'-'~/,f~ -~-.2 ~/+' ~/~'. / ~ In reference to the above, Ms. Moore feels no amended EAF is required for review of the new proposed Hellenic Hotel as approved by the ZBA. See the letter attached. The history below demonstrates that the SEQRA review was done on a different site plan then approved by the ZBA. It appears the proposed scope of the project has changed and should be compared for possible environmental impact. Please refer to the letter attached and dated 01/23/03 from Mr. Voorhis. This letter was issued after the neg. dec. was issued. The letter indicates the P.B. "may wish to have the applicant clarify these discrepancies prior to issuing a new determination of significance". At this time we are waiting for a site plan to be submitted to us for review. We have received a copy of the survey approved by the ZBA. Below is some application case history on the parcel described above. 09/10/03 Letter from Pat Moore, in response to staff letter. 09/04/03 PB staff letter on need after work session 9/2/03. 06/05/03 ZBA appeal 5019 granting relief. 03/13/03 Building Department revised amended disapproval. 01/23/03 Letter from Mr. Voorhis about information submitted. PB may request more information based on discrepancies in the information reviewed before amending SEQRA determination. 01/13/03 Letter from Pat Moore to PB requesting an updated SEQRA submitted an amended EAF, would like PB to updated SEQRA determination by SCHD. 07/09/02 PB resolution establishes lead agency and negative declaration. 05/13/02 Letter from Pat Moore to Mr. Voorhis with an EAF part 1 03/11/02 Letter from Pat Moore we received with an attachment to the EAF long form. 12/16/01 Letter on preliminary review from Mr. Voorhis. (Requires more information to proceed) 10/16/01 Resolution from PB to start lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. 09/21/01 Memo from Mr. Kassner to Mr. Goeringer (Resolution by PB on 7/19/99 requested a part III to be prepared and indicates 07/19/99 was the start of coordinated review for a twenty unit project. 09/21/01 Inter-Departmental Town Memo from Mr. Goehringer to Ms. Scopaz about SP application and SEQRA. 08/07/01 Letter from Mr. Kassner to Mr. Voorhis about revised site plan and EAF Please review and forward any comments or concerns. If you require additional information the file is available in the office. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, vi Enc.: Copy of correspondence. ~p ~0 03 O~:~4p Mobe Lma O?£i~e September I0, 2003 Bruno S,~non Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Bo× l 179 Sou*hold. NtY 1197t by fax PATRICIA C. MOORE Altorney at I. aw 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (63 I) 765-4643 Re: Hellenic SCTM#1000-35- Margaret Rutkowski Secretary 8EP 2003 $outhold Town '~ °- '~ I PlanningBoard Dear Bruno: Thank ~.c)u for your letter da~ed September 4, 2003 please note the following: 1) The full site pl~ meeting To;vn Code requirements is being prepared by Young & Young and will be submitted. 2) We have a/ready submitted 2 long EAF forms: The original plan was for 20 cabins replacing the exmting cab/ns, a Long dAF was submitted and thc SEQRA started on February 8, 1999- this project was disfavored by the Plain'ting Board and this project was discontinued. An amended ~plicant wa~ tiled on July 31,200i with a revised site plan for twelve ur, its in the same configur,~tion as is presently before the Board and a new Long dAF was subrmtted. The Pla. nning Board reviewed the proposed oroject cont~in/ng 12 units, the Planning Board concerns were mitigated by the reduetion of the project density. On or about October 15, 2001 the SEQRA coordinated review was started and on July 9, 2002 a aegative declaration was issued. As you know the ZBA would not hear the area variance application until the Planning Board had issued a SEQR.4. negative declaration. Wlfile wc were awaiting fl~e ZI~A, the Health Department was reviewing our application. The plans were subsequently scaled down to 10 units to conform to Health Department standards. ~~.~.~nlly is the plan that the ZBA reviewed for area variances and the Health departnlent h~ )0 03 05:2~p The SFQRA has been done, the Planning Board took a kard look at the amended plan with a :horou-oh review and analysis 5y Nelson, Pope & Voorhis. Your requ~t tbr another Long EAF does net make sex,se. Envkonmemal review pursuant to SEQRA regulations direct agencies to umtenake the SEQRA review as earl), as is practical for qxpediI.ious approval. The process is designed to conszder less en~irom.nentally damaging alternatives and imposing mifigadon measures ~hich avoid environmental effects to the ma×imam extent practicable. Pursuant to SEQRA, an agency's action may rest:It ~n a design change, as has happened in our ease. The reduction of units does not rcquir~ a new EAF and another SEQRA review.. 3) With rega~'d to ~e Architectural Review Commiaee, I appeared ~wice before the committee to review the elevations of the buff dings. The first ARC meeting on August 14~200I resulted in certain recommendations which were acceptable to my client. I appeared a second date wiuh additional material samples and specifications. Pleese have the ARC reviow their records, it is my understanding taat the ARC has already approved th~ elevations.. As I have stated previously th~ fact that we are proposJnl~ i0 units rather than 12 units does not require ARC' {o review the same elevations. If you wish to discuss this further please do not hesitate to contact me. Ve~;'~til~ yours, "-- ....... ~cia C. Moore pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RIC FLt~RD CAGGIANO WILLL~LM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS /~UkRTIN FI. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (63111 765-3136 September 4, 2003 P~iNG BOARD OFFICE T~NN pr SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore. Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter is to inform you we are in receipt of the health department survey dated and revised March 3, 2003, the Planning Board reviewed it at a work session on September 2, 2003. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed an.,,, further: l) Submit revised site plan copies meeting the requirement of Southold Town Code. Please update the survey to include all the requirements of a site plan. 2) Submit a current executed long EAF form for review on the new configuration of the site plan. 3) Submit construction plans and materials for the ,~RC committee. Enclosed is a cop)' of the basic site plan requirements. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. f/~rur~S ' mon~'-'~ Set, Site PI~Yn Reviewer CC:file Enc, site plan list APPEALS BOARD MEMBER~ Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard E Goehringer George Horning Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.nort h fork.net FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2003 Appl. No. 5019 - George Giannaris, John Giannar s and Others/Hellenic Cabins Property Location: 5145 Main Road, East Marion; CTM 1000-35-2-14. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 1.519-acre parcel has 238.3 ft. frontage along the north side of NYS Route 25 (or Main Road) at East Marion. The property is located in the Limited Business Zone District and improved with a restaurant and small.cabin structures, shown on the map prepared by Young & Young, L.S. dated June 19, 2002, revised March 3, 2003. The applicants also have a parking lease with the owner (Village of Greenport) for their restaurant's expanded parking on the adjacent parce~l.?'.TM 1000-35-2-15.1 of .7658 acre). BASIS O~: APPLICATION: Building Department's August 14, 2001 Notice of Disapproval, amended March 13, 2003, citing Section 100-244B, in its denial of a building permit to construct hotel units in this Limited Business (LB) Zone District, after removal of the existing cabin structures. The new hotel units are proposed to be located at less than 20 feet on a single side yard, less than 45 feet for both side yards (total), and less than 75 feet in the rear yard. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 15, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting Variances for setbacks of the proposed new buildings, after removal of existing frame buildings and noted on the plan prepared by Young & Young, L.S. revised March 3, 2003. The closest setbacks are shown for Duplex Units 7/8 at 20 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 9/10 at 23.64 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 5/6 at 12 feet from the westerly side lot line; Duplex Units 3/4 at 10.99 feet from the westerly side lot line. Page 3 - June 5, 2003 Appl. No. 5019 - Giannaris and others 35-2-14 at East Marion 6. Grant of the requested setback relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of new construction in this Limited Business Zone District, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Chairwoman Tortora, and duly carried, to GRANT the Variance as applied for and shown on the plan prepared by Young & Young, L.S. dated June 19, 2002, revised March 3, 2003. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are exp~:essly addressed in this action. ,' Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Horning, and Orlando. (Absent was Member Oliva.) This Resolution was cJuly adopted (4-0). Lydia ,~.,~tora, ~;h~irwo~an - Approved for Filing 618¢ /03 NELSON~ POPE & VOORHIS~ LI.C CHARLES J. VOORHIS, CER AICP · ARTHUR J KOERBER, P E · VICTOR BERt. P E. JOSEPH R. EPIFAh[A, PE · ROBERT G. NELSON JR hE. PAUL M RACZ. P L S · TI~OMAS E LAMBO, P E. January 23. 2003 Victor L'Eplattenier Southold Planuing Board Town Hall. 53095 Maiu Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Cabins -- Revised S u b nfl s { [-6n rl~e'qe~, - SCTM 100(b'XS;02-1'4 .'"~ NP&V #99074 Dear Victor: We are in receipt of the amended Site Plan application for Hellinic Cabins and have performed a preliminary review of the information provided. Material reviewed include the Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I, and Health Department Site Plan (prepared by Howard Young; dated June 19, 2002, last revised December 12, 2002), attached to Patricia C. Moore's letter dated January 13. The prior project (involving the demolition of the existing structures (with exception of the existing restaurant) and the construction of 12 hotel/cabin units in six (6), one story buildings and an associated pool and spa) received a Negative Declaration on July 8. 2002. The project has been amended and has reduced the number of hotel/cabins units, reduced and reconfigured on-site parking, and has also removed the pool and spa. The applicant has indicated that the SCDHS is requiring the replacement and expansion of the existing sanitary system and has requested that an updated SEQRA determination be issued. The amended project includes the demolition of the existing structures (with the exception of the existing restaurant) and the construction of 10 hotel/cabin units as well as relocation of the existing parking for the restaurant The cabin/hotel units are now clustered in the western portion of the site. Side yard variances are required for units 3, 4, 5 and 6 and rear yard variances are required for units 7, 8. 9 and 10. The amount and layout of on-site parking has been revised, with the majority of parking to be located within a resurfaced parking area in the northern and eastern portion of the site. The eastern portion of the site is currently leased by the SCWA. The applicant has indicated that the terms of the lease with the SCWA have been discussed and that the lease will be extended for another I0 years. As the site plan has been revised to include disturbance within the lease parcel, the applicant should indicate whether the terms of the lease as discussed with the SCWA have been revised as a result of the site plan modification. If so, the new copy of the lease should be provided for the Town's review. The Long EAF Part I has been reviewed and does not appear to accurately reflect proposed site coverages, particularly in light of the resurfacing and expansion of the parking area within the lease parcel. Additionally, the Town Planning Board may wish to request that parking calculations be provided such that conformance with this zoning requirement can be determined. A discrepancy exists with regard to water use/sanitary generation as well as the number of seats within the existing restaurant. The Attachment to the LEAF ~as well as the prior EAF Part 1) indicates the existing restaurant maintains 71 seats while the Site Plan and EAF Part I have been revised to indicate that a total of 250 seats will be maintained i170 seats located inside, 20 seats at the bar. and an additional 60 seats outside), even though the applicant has indicated that the existing restaurant will be maintained "as is". Further, the Attachment Helletfic Cabias January 23, 2003 to the E.,M1F indicates water use at 7.000 gpd, the Site Plan indicates water use at 7,800 gpd, and the EAF Part I indicates ~ater use at 3,700 gpd. The proposed project appears to have been reduced in size and scope; however, due to discrepancies in the number of seats and water use/sanitary generation calculations provided for the existing restaurant, it appears as if the restaurant use is expanding three fold which could result in significant impacts in terms of water use. wastex~ater generatiou, and traffic generatiou. The Planning Board may wish to have the applicant clariS, these discrepancies prior to issuing a new Determination of Significance. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely. NELSON. POPE & VOO~JtlS, LLC Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Page 2 ~oore L~ O??~ce September l 0. 2003 Bruno S O1TIO:t Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Bo× I 179 Sou!hold, NrY 1197i by fax Re: PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney' at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 11952 Tel: (63 l) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Hellenic SCTM;~1000-35-: 8EP 11 2003 $0uth01d 10w, · ,, ,, Planni~l~Board - ~--...~ 1~.1 Dear Bruno: Thud,: ),ou for your letter dated September 4, 2003 please note the following: 1) The full site plan meeting 1-ov;m Code requirements is being prepared by Yotmg & Young and will be submitted 2) We have a/ready submitted 2 long EAF forms: The original [:lan was for 20 cabins rep:acing the existing cabins, a Long EAF was submitted and the SEQRA scar;ed on Fobmary 8, 1999- this project was disfavored by the Planning Board and this project was discontinued. An arnenCed applicant was fried on July 31, 2001 vdth a revised site plan for twelve units in the same configuration as is presently before the Board and a new Long EAF was submitted. The Pla.uning Board reviewed the proposed nroject containing 12 mx/ts, the Planning Board concerns were mitigated by the reduction of the projcct density. On or about October 15, 2001 the SEQRA coordinated review was started and on ,July 9, 2002 a negative declaration was issued. As you lmow the ZBA would net hear -,he area variance application until the Planning Board had issued a SEQR_4. negadve dee'.mat'ion. While we were awaiting the ZBA, the Health Department was reviewing our application. The plans were subsequently scaled down to 10 units to conform to Health Department standards. The plan before your Board pressmly is ,..he plan that the ZB^ reviewed for area variances and the Health depmgment has approved Thc SEQRA has been done, the Planning Board took a kard look at the amended plan with a thorough review ~md analysis by Nelsor~, Pope & Voorhis. Your request for another Long EAF does ,act make sense. Environmental review pursuant to SEQR. A regulaUons direct agencies to undertake the SEQIL~. review as early as is nract[cal for exne.d, iti~us an_nmval. The process is designed to comider less eh*/romuentalIy damaging altematix, es a~d imposing mitigation measures which avoid environmental effects to the maximum extent practicable. Pursuant to SEQRA, an agency's action may rest:It m a design change, as bas happened m our case. The reduction of units does not require a new EAF and anofi0er SEQRA review.. 3) With regm:d to the Architectural Review Committee, I a~peared twice before the committee to review the ele~,'ations of the bcfildings. The first ARC meeting on August 14,200! resulted in certain recommendations which were acceptable to my client. I appeared a second date with additional material samples and spec!fications. Plebe have the ARC review their records, it is my understanding that the ARC has already approved the elevations. As 1 have stated pr*viously the fact that we are proposing 10 units rather than 12 units does not require P~RC to review the same elevatioi1s. If you wish to discuss tins further ple2se do not hesitate to contact me. Ver~;' ~ctil~ yours, ~'- ...... Patricia C. Moore PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICI-IAI~D CAGGIANO WILLIAM J, CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 September 4, 2003 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re; Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear 1Mrs. Moore, This letter is to infom~ you we are in receipt of the health department survey dated and revised 2003. the Planning Board reviewed it at a work session on September 2, 2003. The site plan application will need to include the following to be processed any fi~rther: l) Submit revised site plan copies meeting the requirement of Southold Town Code. Please update the survey to include all the requirements of a site plan. 2) Subnfit a current executed long EAF form for review on the new configuration of the site plan. 3) Submit construction plans and materials for the ARC committee. Enclosed is a cop.,,' of the basic site plan requirements. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1938 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Se~¢r~ Site Plt~fi Reviewer CC:file Enc, site plan list Sttbmts~ion Without a Co~er Letter [] [ ~, ECEIVE.. ~ PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney a[ Law §1C20 Main Road Southo,d, NewYork '[1971 Tel: {63' ) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 July 31, 2 { ,.{ $outhold Tow. ,,Plannin~ Board. R~: Ketlenlc Hosel and Restaurant Dear Barkara: Pursuant to your reques:, the following is a breakdown for the check that was hand 5eliverad to the office yesterday in the amount ~t $2,355.75. 12,0Q0 square feet x .05c = $ 500.00 1~ acres g $30D.GC per apre or frachJo5 therepF $ 600,00 Total due Less tun~s previously paid $1,200.00 BALANCE DUE $ 972,00 TP.e bala~tce cf the check in the amount of $1,383.75 represent.s paynnen5 in full for invo~-ce #'s 1711 and 1240 of Nelson, ?,.)pe ~ Voorhis, LLC. If ','3u have any questions or require ar. ythlng further, please d~ nou hesitaue ~o con~act me. , ~e~ ycurs, .... · Pacricia C. Moore PATRIClA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road $outhold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 July 30, JUL 3 0 2003 Southold Tow~ PJ~.nin~ Board 2003 Town of Southold Planning Board office p.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Attn: Bruno Semon Senior site plan Reviewer RE: Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Dear Bruno: Pursuant to your letter dated July 9, 2003, enclosed please find six (6) prints of the revised site plan date March 3. 2003. Also enclosed is check ~109 of John Giannaris and Anna Giannaris, dated July 29, 2003, payable to the Town of Southold in the amount of $2,355.75. This check represents payment of the two invoices for environmental review and the balance of the fee for the revised site plan. If you have any questions or require anything further, please do not hesitate to contact me. j~r~z~_ 5~ yourS, ~__~I~ricia C. PCM/mm Enclosures PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLI:MM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 July 9, 2003 Patricia Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re~ Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, This letter is to recap the telephone conversation on the above site plan. Our records indicate the following fee's need to be submitted: 7/31/02 Invoice for environmental review: $963.75 4/16/03 Invoice for environmental review: $420.00 Total: $1383.75 Attached is a copy of the ZBA # 5019 decision. We will wait for a new revised site plan to be submitted in compliance with the decision before processing. We have a record ors 228.00 paid in 2/99 for the site plan. Please submit the appropriate fee for the revised site plan. If there are any questions you can contact us at (631) 765-1802 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Senior Site Plan Reviewer CC:file enc, ZBA 5019, 7/31/02 inv, 4/16/02 inv. ,t, Pope & Vi l?rhis, LLC ¢Vh~tman Road PhonilY31-427-5665 ,e NY 11747 Fax: 631-427-5620 Invoice Fo: Town of Southold Planning Board 456 Griffmg Avenue PO Box 389 Riverhead N'Y 11901 Attention: Francis J Yakaboski Property' 99074 Project: Hellenic Cabins Manager: Later Shana Invoice #: 1711 Invoice Date: April 16, 2003 VA00794 MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO NELSON POPE &VOORHIS Invoice Amount $420.00 Update Review (Site Plan Change) Work Performed: 1/16 thru 1/24/03 Professional Services IS_funicipal Environmental Scientist Municipal SEQR Review Partner Municipal SEQR Review Municipal Total: Professional Services Totals Bill Hours Bill Rate Charge 3.00 85.00 255.00 1.00 165.00 165.00 4.00 $420.00 $42~00 *** Total Project Invoice Amount $420. O0 All invoices are du* net 30 days. A late charge of 1% per month will be added to any unpaid balance aider 30 day& Please make all checks payable to NELSON POPE & VOORHIS Please include invoice number on check NELSON POPE & VOORHIS NOW ACCEPTS CREDIT CARDS VISA - MASTERCARD - AMERICAN EXPRESS i'son, Pope & ,Voor, is, LLC alt Whitman Road Phone: 63~!~7-5665 ,e NY 11747 Fax: 631-427-5620 Invoice Property: 99074 Project: Hellenic Cabins Manager: Voorhis, Charles VA00794 Town of Southold Plannine Board cio Francis J Yakaboski 456 Griffing Ave, PO Box 389 Riverhead NY 11901 Attention: Bennett Orlowski, Jr Invoice #: 1240 Invoice Date: July 31, 2002 I ,I ~AAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO NELSON POPE &VOORHIS Invoice Amount $963.75 Environmental Planning Review Review Revised Plan Dec 01 Review Revisions April, 2002 Review Additional Material and Update EAF Part II, May 02 Services: 12/1/01 thru 3/20/02 Professional Services Municipal Environmental Scientist Partner General Environmental Municipal Application Reviews Municipal Application Reviews Municipal Total: Environmental Scientist Misc. Environmental Consulting General Environmental Total: Professional Services Totals Bill Hours Bill Rate 1.50 85.00 127.~0 2.75 165.00 453.~5 4.25 $581. 5 4,50 4.50 85.00 382.~0 ~--~"~ $382.~0 $963.~5 *~* Total Project Invoice Amount $963. All invoices are due net $0 days. A late charge of 1% per month will be added to any unlntid balance after $0 days. Please make all checks payable to NELSON POPE & VOORHIS Please include invoice number on check $outholdTown Plannino B rd Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179 ~' Southold, New York 1197J.-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2003 Appl. No. 5019 - Georqe Giannads, John Giannaris and Others/Hellenic Cabins Property Location: 5145 Main Road, East Marion; CTM 1000-35-2-14. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 1.519-acre parcel has 238.3 ft. frontage along the north side of NYS Route 25 (or Main Road) at East Marion. The property is located in the Limited Business Zone District and improved with a restaurant and small cabin structures, shown on the map prepared by Young & Young, L.S. dated June 19, 2002, revised March 3, 2003. The applicants also have a parking lease with the owner (Village of Greenport) for their restaurant's expanded parking on the adjacent parcel (CTM 1000-35-2-15.1 of .7658 acre). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's August 14, 2001 Notice of Disapproval, amended March 13, 2003, citing Section 100-244B, in its denial of a building permit to construct hotel units in this Limited Business (LB) Zone District, after removal of the existing cabin structures. The new hotel units are proposed to be located at less than 20 feet on a single side yard, less than 45 feet for both side yards (total), and less than 75 feet in the rear yard. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on May 15, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting Variances for setbacks of the proposed new buildings, after removal of existing frame buildings and noted on the plan prepared by Young & Young, L.S. revised March 3, 2003. The closest setbacks are shown for Duplex Units 7/8 at 20 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 9/10 at 23.64 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 5/6 at 12 feet from the westerly side lot line; Duplex Units 3/4 at 10.99 feet from the westerly side lot line. Page 3 - June 5, 20 Appl. No. 5019 - Giannaris and others 35-2-14 at East Marion 6. 'Grant of the requested setback relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of new construction in this Limited Business Zone District, while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Goehringer, seconded by Chairwoman Tortora, and duly carried, to GRANT the Variance as applied for and shown on the plan prepared by Young & Young, L.S. dated June 19, 2002, revised March 3, 2003. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Tortora (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Horning, and Odando. (Absent was Member Oliva.) This Resolution was duly ado_o~.~ (4-0). Lydia/~./'¢'o~tora, i~;h~irwoman - Approved for Filing 615~) /03 aPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ,d~~~ ~ ~') Lydia A. Tort ' ~ ~/~ GerardP[~g~ ~ [ ~ ~ ~~/~ Ruth~ ~va ~ ~ Ill II~a~~ I T WN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2003 Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net Appl. No. 5019 - Georqe Giannaris, John Giannaris and Others/Hellenic Cabins Property Location: 5145 Main Road, East Marion; CTM 1000-35-2-14. SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 1.519-acre parcel has 238.3 ft. frontage along the north side of NYS Route 25 (or Main Road) at East Marion. The property is located in the Limited Business Zone District and improved with a restaurant and small cabin structures, shown on the map prepared by Young & Young, L.S. dated June 19, 2002, revised March 3, 2003. The applicants also have a parking lease with the owner (Village of Greenport) for their restaurant's expanded parking on the adjacent parcel (CTM 1000-35-2-15.1 of .7658 acre). BASIS OF APPLICATION: Building Department's August 14, 2001 Notice of Disapproval, amended March 13, 2003, citing Section 100-244B, in its denial of a building permit to construct hotel units in this Limited Business (LB) Zone District, after removal of the existing cabin structures. The new hotel units are proposed to be located at less than 20 feet on a single side yard, less than 45 feet for both side yards (total), and less than 75 feet in the rear yard. FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public headng on this application on May 15, 2003, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant is requesting Variances for setbacks of the proposed new buildings, after removal of existing frame buildings and noted on the plan prepared by Young & Young, L.S. revised March 3, 2003. The closest setbacks are shown for Duplex Units 7/8 at 20 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 9/10 at 23.64 feet from the northerly rear lot line; Duplex Units 5/6 at 12 feet from the westerly side lot line; Duplex Units 3/4 at 10.99 feet from the westedy side lot line. pLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, .YR. Cha/rnlan RICHARD CAGOIANO 'WILLIAM J, cREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS ISq. ARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 To'~n 1{a11. 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: July 7, 2003 Zoning Board of Appeals Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer~,~ Appeal # 5109 for Giannafis (Hellenic) 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY SCTM: 1000~35-2~14 & 15.1 Zone: LB, RSO In reference to the above, attached is a letter copy from the Suffolk County Water Authority for the leasing of parking. This is for your information and file. Please keep us up date on the project. Thank you in advance, Cc: file, vs, pb Enc.: SCWA letter. 473889 SOUTHOLD 35.-2-14 5145 MAIN RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO === GIANNARIS JOHN & ORS C/O ANNA GIANNARIAS PO BOX 506 EAST MARION NY 11939 YSRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SCH PRCLS 417 COTTAGES =MISC RS-SS 1 BANK DATE : 07/07/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 04 I======== ====== ASSESSMENT DATA =:========= I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 3,200 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 18,S00 COUNTY 1&,500 **PRIOR** TOWN 18,500 ILAND 3,200 SCHOOL 18,500 ITOTAL 18,S00 ==DIMENSIONS ===1======= SALES ACRES 1.25 IBOOK i SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 00030 PR OWNER =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 :====::======1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE IFD026 IPK065 IWW020 ISW011 Fl=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF INFORMATION ================================== VALUE F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC F10=GO TO MENU SCWA Timothy J. Hopkins General Counsel I SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (631) 563-0236 Fax (631) 563-0370 November 1, 2002 cci Stephen M. Jones Very truly yours, Mr. John Giarmaris Hellenic Snack Bar & Restaurant 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939-0506 Re: Lease of SCWA Property Dear Mr. Giannaris: As we discussed, you currently lease property fi'om the Suffolk County Water Authority that is utilized for parking for your restaurant. The subject lease is for a term often (10) years which term will expire in 2004. The Water Authority currently has water supply pipes that run through the property below the ground and anticipates using the property in the same manner for the foreseeable furore. This use obviously does not conflict with your use for parking. Upon expiration of the current lease in 2004, the Water Authority would gladly consider extending the lease for your parking use under similar terms and conditions as the present lease. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: July 7, 2003 Zoning Board of Appeals .,,.4 Bruno Semon, Senior Site Plan Reviewer//f'.J,.." Appeal # 5109 for Giannaris (Hellenic) 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Zone: LB, R80 In reference to the above, attached is a letter copy from the Suffolk County Water Authority for the leasing of parking. This is for your information and file. Please keep us up date on the project. Thank you in advance. Cc: file, vs, pb Enc.: SCWA letter. 473889 S~UTHOLD 35.-2-14 514~ MAIN RD = OWNER & MAILING INFO GIANNARIS JOHN & ORS C/O ANNA GIANNARIAS PO BOX ~06 EAST MARION NY 11939 SRPS ASSESSMENT INQUIRY SCHOOL OYSTER PONDS SCH CLS 417 COTTAGES === =MISC RS-SS 1 BANK DATE : 07/07/2003 ROLL SEC TAXABLE TOTAL RES SITE TOTAL COM SITE ACCT NO 04 I======== =:::== ASSESSMENT DATA ===:======: I **CURRENT** RES PERCENT ILAND 3~B00 **TAXABLE** ITOTAL 18~00 COUNTY 18~500 **PRIOR** TOWN 18,~00 ILAND 3,200 SCHOOL 18~00 ITOTAL 18,~0B ==DIMENSIONS ===1======= SALES INFORMATION ================================== ACRES 1.2~ IBOOK i SALE DATE 00/00/00 IPAGE 00030 PR OWNER =======TOTAL EXEMPTIONS 0 =============1== TOTAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS 4 ===== CODE AMOUNT PCT INIT TERM VLG HC OWN CODE UNITS PCT TYPE VALUE IFD026 IPK065 IWW020 ISW011 Fl=NEXT PARCEL F3=NEXT EXEMPT/SPEC F4=PREV EXEMPT/SPEC 75.10- 03-050 F6=GO TO INVENTORY F9=GO TO XREF F10=GO TO MENU SCWA Timothy J. Hopkins General Counsel SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHOI ITY Administrative Offices: ~050 Sunrise Highway, 0akdale, NY ~ ~ 769-090~ (63]) 563-0236 ~ax (63~) 563-0370 November 1, 2002 MI'. John Giannaris Hellenic Snack Bar & Restaurant 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939-0506 Re: Lease of SCWA Property Dear Mr. Giannaris: As we discussed, you currently lease property from the Suffolk County Water Authority that is utilized for parking for your restaurant. Thc subject lease is for a term often (10) years which term will expire in 2004. Thc Water Authority currently has water supply pipes that mn through the property below the ground and anticipates using the property in the same manner for the foreseeable furore. This use obviously does not conflict with your use for parking. Upon expiration of the current lease in 2004, the Water Authority would gladly consider extending the lease for your parking use under similar terms and conditions as the present lease. Very truly yours, i h ns cci Stephen M. Jones/ Semon~ Bruno From: Sent: To: Subject: Scopaz, Valerie Thursday, July 03, 2003 2:05 PM Semon, Bruno Giannaris - Hellenic Cabins Bruno, In today's mail, there is a ZBA decision that references a lease between the property owner and the Village of Greenport for parking. The land is not owned by the Village. Its owned by the SCWA. Please bring this to attention of ZBA inasmuch as the decision will have to be amended. Valerie PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman RICHARD CAGGIANO WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS MARTIN H. SIDOR P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631~ 765-3136 MEMORANDUM PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD To: Fro m: Lydia A. Tortora Chairperson, Zoning Board of Appeals Bennett Orlowski, Jr.~ Chairman, Southold Planning Board Re: Planning Board Application Review ( ZBA Application No. 5109) Hellenic Hotel and Restaurant, 5145 Main Road, East Marion DATE: May 7, 2003 The Planning Board discussed this project at its Work Session on May 5,2003. The Planning Board notes that the present application has been downsized from the original proposal, only 10 hotel units are now shown on the plans, and the swimming pool has been eliminated. Most of the other changes reflect Health Department requirements for an upgraded sanitary system for the existing Hellenic restaurant. The Planning Board notes that a new parking area will be created behind the restaurant, and is concerned about the significant grade change between the existing parking lot to the east, and the new parking lot and access to the motel units. We note that several large trees are now located on the intervening slope, and would like to preserve as much of the natural landscaping as possible on the slope. The Planning Board also is concerned that the main restaurant parking lot to the east, currently leased to applicant by the SCWA, should be secured by a very long lease to provide guaranteed parking for the restaurant. We also note that the lot is not well maintained, and improperly drained. The Planning Board has no objection to the pending ZBA application pertaining to the sideyard setbacks. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer George Homing Ruth D. Oliva Vincent Orlando TOWN MEMO BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 http://southoldtown.northfork.net TO: FROM: DATE: SUB J: Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman, Planning Board Lydia A. Tortora, Chairwoman, Zoning Board of Appe~ May 1, 2003 Request for Planning Board Coordination Reply Joint Application Reviews The following map reviews are pending before the Zoning Board of Appeals, and calendared for a public hearing and possible decision on May 15, 2003: Referral(s) under Site Plan Provisions: Appl. No. 5287 -Warren Melhado Project Description: Construct an amateur radio tower exceeding height limitation Location of Property: 165 Wood Lane, Southold .,~Giannaris (Hellenic) -- ,~ Project Description: Construct new hotel units with side yard setbacks// Location of Property: 5145 Main Road, East Marion ~ ~orward comments or suggestions on the site issues that may be of concern to the Planning Board under the site plan jurisdiction reviews. By way of a copy of this letter, we are also a~king the applicants to contact your Department (765-1938) to determine if original maps, an application, or other documentation may be necessary for your department to commence this preliminary review. Please feel free to review the official ZBA file at any time that is convenient for your staff. Thank you. cc: W. Melhado P. Moore, Esq. File Board Members trAY -2 ~ FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL TO: Patricia Moore AJC Giarmaris (Hellenic) 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated July 3 l, 200 t DATE: August 14, 2001 AMENDED: January 22, 2003 AMENDED: March 13, 2003 For permit for hotel units at Location of property: Route 25, East Marion County Tax Map No. I000 - Section 3~5 Block_2 Lot I~4 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this non-conforming 66,167 square foot lot in the Limited Business (LB) Zone, is not permitted pursuant to Article XX1V, Section I00-244B, which requires a minimum single side yard setback of 20 feet, a total side yard setback of 45 feet and a minimum rear yard setback of 75 feet. According to the applicant, hotel unit//4/3 shows a single side yard setback of +,- 10.99 feet, hotel unit /16/5 shows a single side yard setback of +/- 12.05 feet, hotel unit//7/8 shows a rear yard setback of 20 feet, and hotel unit//9/10 shows a rear yard setback of+/- 23.64 feet. This permit was amended on January 22, 2003, in response to amended plans submitted to this department. This permit was amended on March 13, 2003, to reflect changes to the applicant's proposed site plan. tur' ¢ Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application, may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSICI, JR. Ch~rraan WILLL~M J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD July 9, 2002 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel & Restaurant Located on SR 25 in East Marion SCTM#1000-35-2~14 & 15.1 Zone: LB/R-80 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~) Chairman Encl. NELSON~ POPE & VOORHIE$~ LLC CHARLES J. VOORHIS, CEr~ AICP ,ARTHUR J. KOERBER, BE. · VICTOR BER~ P.E. JOSEPH R. EPIFANIA, P.E. · ROBERT G. NELSON, JR.. F~E. PAUL M. RACZ, P LS. · THOMAS E LAMBO, RE. January 23. 2003 Victor L' Eptattenier Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road 1:'.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Cabins Revised S u bmis ~o 'g~r~ SCTM 100tJ.~,~T2,14 NP&V fl:99074 Dear Victor: We are in receipt of the amended Site Plan application for Hellinic Cabins and have performed a preliminary review of the information provided. Material reviewed include the Long Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) Part I, and Health Department Site Plan (prepared by Howard Young; dated June 19, 2002, last revised December 12, 2002), attached to Patricia C. Moore's letter dated January 13. The prior project (involving the demolition of the existing structures (with exception of the existing restaurant) and the construction of 12 hotel/cabin units in six (6), one story buildings and an associated pool and spa) received a Negative Declaration on July 8, 2002. The project has been amended and has reduced the number of hotel/cabins units, reduced and reconfigured on-site parking, and has also removed the pool and spa. The applicant has indicated that the SCDHS is requiring the replacement and expansion of the existing sanitary system and has requested that an updated SEQRA determination be issued. The amended project includes the demolition of the existing structures (with the exception of the existing restaurant) and the construction of 10 hotel/cabin units as well as relocation of the existing parking for the restaurant. The cabin/hotel units are now clustered in the western portion of the site. Side yard variances are required for units 3, 4, 5 and 6 and rear yard variances are required for units 7, 8, 9 and 10. The amount and layout of on-site parking has been revised, with the majority of parking to be located within a resurfaced parking area in the northern and eastern portion of the site. The eastern portion of the site is currcntly leased by the SCWA. The applicant has indicated ;hat the terms of the lease with the SCWA have been discussed and that the lease will be extended for another 10 years. As the site plan has been revised to include disturbance within the lease parcel, the applicant should indicate whether the terms of the lease as discussed with the SCWA have been revised as a result of the site plan modification. If so, the new copy of the lease should be provided for the Town's review. The Long EAF Part ! has been reviewed and does not appear to accurately reflect proposed site coverages, particularly in light of the resurfacing and expansion of the parking area within the lease parcel. Additionally, the Town Planning Board may wish to request that parking calculations be provided such that conformance with this zoning requirement can be determined. A discrepancy exists with regard to water use/sanitary generation as well as the number of seats within the existing restaurant. The Attachment to the LEAF (as well as the prior EAF Part 1) indicates the existing restaurant maintains 71 seats while the Site Plan and EAF Part I have been revised to indicate that a total of 250 seats will be maintained (170 seats located inside. 20 seats at the bar, and an additional 60 seats outside), even though the applicant has indicated that the existing restaurant will be maintained "as is". Further, the Attachment Hellenic Cabins January 23, 2003 to the EAF indicates water use at 7,000 gpd, the Site Plan indicates water use at 7,800 gpd, and the EAF Part I indicates water use at 3,700 gpd. The proposed project appears to have been reduced in size and scope; however, due to discrepancies in the number of seats and water use/sanitary generation calculations provided for the existing restaurant, it appears as if the restaurant use is expanding three fold which could result in significant impacts in terms of water use, wastewater generation, and traffic generation. The Planning Board may wish to have the applicant clarify these discrepancies prior to issuing a new Determination of Significance. If you have an)' questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, NEL,~O/~ POPE~/~. S, LLC Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Page 2 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 1197l Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (63 l) 765-4643 January 13, 2003 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Hellenic Resort and Restaurant vi.__ Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Dear Chairman and Board members: The Health Department is requiring the replacement of the Restaurant's antiquated sanitary system with an expanded system. The Health Department requires that the restaurant replace it's existing sanitary system before it opens this Sprinq. The Health Department requested an updated SEQRA determination from the Town of Southold which includes both the Hotel and Restaurant. The previous Negative Declaration was too general for the Health Department. The Restaurant is "as is", however, because the parking area is being disrupted for the replacement of the sanitary system this spring the owners wish to remove the unsightly cottages and resurface the parking area. Enclosed please find revised plan of 10 hotel units which also includes the revised parking for the existing restaurant. The Hellenic Restaurant has been waiting a long time to improve their property. The location of the hotel units are in the best location, I will show the plan to the building department to determine if we need setback variances. I had previously forwarded to you the lease for the adjacent parking lot. My client has discussed the terms of the lease with the Water Authority and they will extend their lease for another 10 years. I have enclosed an amended site plan application (includes the parking layout for the restaurant) and amended Long EAF which includes the existing restaurant. Please place this on your calender as soon as possible because the Health Department has placed a very tight time frame for the SEQRA Negative Declaration. Ve ry/~yours, ~__Pa~uricia C. Moore cc: Mr. George Giannaris December 4, 2002 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631 ) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Victor Re: Hellenic Snack Bar and Cottages Dear Victor: I need to meet with the Planning Board for their December 9=h work session. The Health Department is insisting that Hellenic replace the Sanitary System for the Restaurant immediately. We had obtained approval for the larger plan in 1989, but due to the Zoning Board's delay in scheduling our setback variance application nothing has been done on the property. The Health Departmen~ requested a letter from the Planning Board authorizing the replacement of the sanitary system. We will continue our site plan review of the hotel cottages and the sanitary system which will be constructed for that use. If there is anything else you need please do non hesitate to contact me, cC: George Giannaris Southold Town Plan .in.a Board SUFFOLK COUNTY WATt,AUTHORITY the desk of: STEPHEN M. JONES CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER [] Review & return [] Handle this [] Reply and copy me [] E-mail your response '~OMMENT [] Call me [] See ms [] Please approve [] Review and forward to Timothy J. Hopkins General Counsel SUI OI K COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY Administrative Offices: 4060 Sunrise Highway, Oakdale, NY 11769-0901 (631) 563-0236 Fax (631) 563-0370 November 1, 2002 cc: Stephen M. Jones Very truly yours, M~. John Giannaris Hellenic Snack Bar & Restaurant 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939-0506 Re: Lease of SCWA Property Dear Mr. Giannaris: As we discussed, you currently lease property from the Suffolk County Water Authority that is utilized for parking for your restaurant. The subject lease is for a term often (10) years which term will expire in 2004. The Water Authority currently has water supply pipes that run through the property below the ground and anticipates using the property in the same manner for the foreseeable future. This use obviously does not conflict with your use for parking. Upon expiration of the current lease in 2004, the Water Authority would gladly consider extending the lease for your parking use under similar terms and conditions as the present lease. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rtnkowski Secretary July 17, 2002 Southold Town Planning Board Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Att: Victor Re: Hellenic Snack Bar and Cottages Dear Victor: Enclosed is a copy of the lease with the Village of Greenport and assignment to the Suffolk County Water Authority. Mr. Giannaris advised me that the SCWA would not allow him to resurface the parking lot with cement or black top, only blue stone, because of the proximity of a water supply well Northeast of the parking lot. The lease is in effect until anticipate a continuation of the lease. standing offer with the Suffolk County to purchase the property from them. Nov. 2004, we We have a Water Authority If there is anything else you need please do not hesitate to contact me. ~ye~ .~ yours, ~ricia C. Moore cc: George Giannaris ~o~ ':.~at ¥~E OF G~E~POR?, a Municipal Co~pora~on o~anized ~'~d exi~ti.~ unde~.'~the laws of the State of New York, having its o~fic.e at.~236 Tht~d Street, Green~ort, S~ffolk County, New YOrK 11944, ASSI~Oa, l~.J'coneiderstion Of tbs su~ o~ One {$1.00) Dollar paid by SUFFO~.COUNT~ WATER AUTHORITY, a public benefit uor~ora=~l func=?on'~]~g unds.r, and by virtue o~ the laws o~ S~ate o~ New York,. h~ing i=.~ p=inc~pal office at 4060 Sunrise Hi~]~way, Oakdal~, 'N~ York 1~.769, as ASSIGNEE, and for o~er good and valuable cons~de'~t~ons,"-'~does hereby assign u~o the ASSigNeE a certa~ lease date~iDece~b~r 9, 1994 by and between the OF GREENPO~T, as .[,es ,s~r, and'~ELLENIC CABINS.AND ~NACK BAR, INC., TO HAV~ AND ro ~LD the.~a~e un~o the ASSIGNEE and ASSIGNEE'S this date for the balance o~ ~he ~er~ of sa~d ~ss~ an~ any cenewals o= extenslon~ thereo~ ~herein coutaine~. IN ~ITNESS ~HER~OF, ths"~A$SIGNOR Mayor STATE OF NEW YQRK '~- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK· .S$..~ .~. ut~ the. ~ ~'., . 'd~F of D~ember, 1997 before me Came ' P nd ~ay that he.?xesidea~:at 143 Sixth S~ree~', Greenport, Ne~ York 11944, ~hat ' ~e t~- ~yo~ o~ ~he Village of Greenport and fha= he signed.h~ na~"~'~iereto by order of ~he Board lease is' ma~ and ~ted on the of ' ~.994, by and between :~he' I'~I~O~ATED VILL~G! OF GREEN1K)RT, a municipal corporati.on."~gan£~, and existing unde= t~e 1M of the Sta=e of New York, ~lng ~ principal offices &= 236 Third Sgreet, Oreenpor~, Co~'~ of ~ffolk and State of New YO~k, herein referred to as L~BSO=~:i' and H~r. RNIO O~BXNS AND SNACK BAH, ~NC. with o~fSc~s a~ (NO #) Ma~_~.ROad, ~st ~lon, Co~=y of Su~olk, S=a~e of New York, herein ~erred 'i~ as LOS~H. Lessee and :Lelse~' .~'~es f~' Lealor, for th~ ptlr]L:~se o~ parking and ingress and eg=e8~ for paj~ng only and for no o~he= purpose, ~hose certain premis.eb.''~Ath .'.~e &ppm~_.enancee, situated in the Village of ~reenp0~, .'.~ o~.'~uC~ld~ ~un~y Of Suffolk and Sta~e of N~ ~ork, and m0~ 'p~ul~lF descried ~ tho s~h~ule herein, the Ce~ "P isesa.(:~rofora ~o ~e real p~rty ~ve described anU to an~ ~=~ lo~ t~reon f~ t~ =o =~e during =h~. =e~. he~. ~ s~11 h~ ~ission =o erec~ 2. Tg~ti., . Th~ term ~ this lease shall be for ten (lO) years, commencin~ on.'::~he ls~..-'~y o~ D~r, 1994, and'e~ng on ~he 30th day o~ N~, 20~. 3. ~= ..T~.~n~'¢co be ~id by the ~lsee h~eunder shall be as foli~:''~..~ $250.~ ~r ~nth for the f~st five (5) . years and ~300.00 pe~!'~onth '~= Che second five (~) y~ars. 4. CONDITIONS:.:!'OF r.~; . ~e lease 'e~ bo co~ioned upon ~eaaee, a~ ~.'~o~ c~ ~d e~nee~ v~ 60 da~ of e~cu~on of thi~ ~ea~ e~'&ng ~ Lne~alling a sp~ r~l fete of no less than 3 fe~ in h~'ghC, ~mning approximately 120 feet ~s~alled to preven~.'~a~n~,of ~eaee fr~ 'using ~ V~lla~ of ~enpo~ righ~ o~ ~ whl~' lies ~o the Ess= of ~ P'r~ses. Failu~ ~o t~ly i~all., e~ f~e a~ll o~lCu~e a ~oach of this lease in vhich :'.'..~vent .~."mso~: may isseedia'~oly t~na~e the 5. posS ssxo eeor covenants t~C LosS0~ Is s~od og C~ d~led p~isoe in fee · s~ple and h~ full r~ght tO;'~ this lease ~ ~ ~Ssee shall .h~..ve qvteC a~ ~a~e~le pos~ewion o£ the ~w. 4 ced pree~see du~£ng the term hereof. .'~ 6. OS~S pROH~.~ITED, !'i..,--LellSee shell not use, or permit the d~i~ed premises, orS~ pad,he,eof, to be ue~, for any pu~ose or ~u~oses ot~r t~an ~:}.~ee o~ ~se8 for which Che d~is~ p~gsea are.~here~'~esl~, ~ no use shall ~ ~de or pe~iCCed ~o be ~de~.'~f ghe .~lled pr~leS, or acrs ~ne, which o~A~reaae ~ pr~ of any ine~ce will cause a ca~ce~l~Aon ""~ organization or Core. ny. a..M~: necessar~ for the ~tiLatenence o~ insurance as here~ p~o~, covez'ing the land. end any 7. WASTE AND ~ISANCB~.,~"ROHXBXTBDI Les'see shall nsc commit, or suffer to be cMtted, ~ waste on tho. demised pz~n~ses, or any nuisance. ': 8 SUBLETTI~AND AS~NT~' The Lessee shall ncc sublet consent shall be ~d ~'~(}s~11 ~ =~ option o~ the Lo~or of Lessee nor an~ premises or any bul~Xngs t'.~r~cn shall be sub)eot to involuntary assignment, transfer[{ or sa'.~., or to:aseignm~nt, transfer, or sale by operation of'' 1~ .in .~y manner whatsoever, and any such attempted involUnca~ aea£~nt, transfer, or sale shall be void 9, NOTICES.t '~1 no~es, demands, or o~er writing tfl this lease provided to b given .~.made O~ sent, 'or which may bo given or made or sent, b~]eithor~pa~y, hereto to the other, shell be deemed to have b~e~'full~'~',~lven or made or seflt when 'made in writing and depoe£~ in ~ Un,ced States postage prepa~d.,"'a~d~addres~Ud as TO L~SSOR~...2364Th/xd.. ,, ~eet, Greenpor2, He~ York 11944 TO LESS2E~ Roadr.'[~al~ Ma~ion, New York 10.' P~PA~RS'~'DBS~CT~ONOF I~ROV~MENTS~ Lessee sha~l, throughout 2he ~erm ~f th~s .".~ase,. at its own cost, end without any '0 ' ''~ '~;' expense ~o ,Lese r, .',],~&n~a~ the ~ses and an~ ~pro~n~s thereto, l~ludl~g .~lk~on~ t~e to, ~n ~od, san~, and nea~ o~er, con~on., ~ repair, ~d, except as s~c~f&cal!y provided herein, r~st~e .and .~ehab£1itate any impk-ovements .of any kind which may be. de~royed ~ d~maqed by fire, c&sualty, or any other cause whatsoever. Les~ shell not be obliga~ed .to ~ke any repairs, replacemen~.~, · or ":~en~ls.. of ~ k~nd, . ~ure, or t~e~on. ~ssee s'~ &~iO ~1~ wi~h a~ abide ~ ~11 federal, ordinances, law~ a~ re~l~o~ a~feo~inq the d~sed the ~rov~m=s the~on or .. F ac~ivl~ or co~l=ion on or in such premises. 11. any loss, INDEMNI.~ION O~LES$OR~ Lessee shall be liable for i. nJury,.'de~h, or":'.~amage., to persons or prope=~y which ,~ereafter pieced or'~...:, built ':,.~.. t~ p~ses and ~o the .property of Lessee in. on, o:r ~Ut ~pre~ais.s, and for injuries to pe~sons or ~ro~erty 'in or~utth~,~remiaes, ftys any cause arisin9 at any The two preening ae~mencas aha11 not al~Dly to' loss ~ lnJuxy, or d~ge 'a~8~.g ~ re~son o~ ~he .egl&g~nce or ~sconduc= any t:Ll~e ma?' be suE~red. '!~ . o={~usta~ned., by Lessee or by any' person whosoever may a~'~n~, e~me ~ using or occupying or visiting the demised premisea::or:~e in,!~on, or about ~he s~, whether suuh loss, injury, dea=h.~' or dm~,. ge lhall be caused by or in any way reGult, from or ar&s~ ou~ o.~ any act, o~&asion, or negligence of ~essee or 3~ any'.~cupant.~; sub~enant, visitor, or user o£ any portion o~ the p~em' es, or.~shall resul~ from or be caused by any ocher ma~ter or ~h£~wheth.~.o~.: ..:; ~he sa~eklnd, as or of a different indemnify lessor, f.o~damage~.to the tmp=ovement8 ~hat ams now on or act&on at law or In e~u~ty shall b~ brought to ~d:'covor ~..y ~nt under ~h~e lease, or for or on account of any .b~eac~ of, o~ to en£o~o o~ £nte~pret any o~ the covenan'ts, eerms, ...or'~ond&t£~s of thi~ lease, or for t~ O~ the po~ession o'~' tho d~tsod p~&sos, =~ p~valll~g ~y s~ll ~m ~n~ltled ~O-:~rec~ f~ ~ other pa~ty ao ~am of tho prevailing pa~'.e .~s.... n~le a~o~eF'~ f~, ~ho ~un~ o~ which s~l[. be f~d:~ ~h~ ~ ~d 8~11 be made a par~ of 13. ~Dg~lt~ OF'____SlS~ ~eo~ s~ll pay the rent and all other s~ r'e~ed tO:~.4~ paid by lessee h~under ~oun~8, at ~he ~ a~ ~ ~ ho=~in p~ld~, a~ shall keep and perfo~ al! .~ to~ ~ co~tto~ ~reof on its part to be kept and perfo~m~ and, ~. the exp~Jcation or sooner te~m£nat£on -u£ ~h£s lease, peec~ly ~q~e~l~ ~.gt and surrender 'to les~or the premises in. go~.. o~de~.~and condition subject to the other pro,~'isions of ~hts .l~.~se. ~ ~ evln~ of the non-perforce by [ea~e ~y be. ~n~d am ~ p~d. 14. INSU~C~ ~80~ 8~11 ma&stain ~n o~ect ~ugh~ ~Ae ~e~m cf ~h~a !'ea~' pe~so~l ~n~u~ Xlubil£ty ~naurance covering the premises and. £~0 app~erdncos and =he s~dawalks fronC£ng ehereon in the ~'oa...~ of ~.. ~I~ ~ ($1,000,000.o0) ~o~ !$~,000,000.00) ~Or;~ ~ o= ~ath o~ a~y n-~r of p.rson in cue ~ccurrence, .'and~.~opo~ ~ge ll~lll~y ~urance ~ ~he a~ounc of T~EE MILLZ.ON DOLLARS ($3~00,000~00).* Such insurance shell specifically insure Lessee. . age.st...., al~:':.liabllity assumed by both Les~o~ and Lessee, but shall be~i~o end'.~."sed, a. to create the ~olicies had been Written'"' for Leleor{:~:a~d WAIVEs: The ~ ~ ~..or ~, 'or ~e faille of covenant, or condltAon he=sAn conta~ sha~.'n°= be dee~ed ~o be a waiver of such term, covenant, or c~tlon~, or' subsequent breach of the same, or any other term, c~nant, ~:6r' cond/tion ~herein con~ained. The subsequent &ccel~an~ of re~. hereunder by ~eesor shall not be deemed 'tO be a We~V~.~'of a~.'.'preced~g breach by Lessee of any ~erm, covenant, or co~dL~lon~0'f =his lease, other than the failure o~' Lessee. ~o ~. ~he ~iCular rental so accepted, '~egardl. ess o£ Les.or's know~dge of~uc.h precede, rig b=each at th~ t~ o~ acceptance of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~lle par~e~:.have .e~Ou~ed th~s le~se on the day and year first above wr£tten~: '"" STATE OF NEW YOIQ() ':' :' ~$~ . :,... COUNTY OF SUFFO~} .:. -." On the. day o,~. ;H~W4~l~.., 199~, before me personally came Street, Green~rt,.'.N~ork ~1944~ ~= he Il t~ ~or of t~ Inco~ora=ed Vlllage:~ G~=~, t~ ~O~ de,crUd ~d sa~ ~C he ~a~ &t (~9) ~ ~d, Bal~ ~lon, N~ York aea~ affixed co ~t~d' ~t~ ~s such co~to 8~1, ~ l~ was so affi~ by o~ ~. ~~ of d~Cor8 of said Ail ~ha= certain'tra.~k or ps, eel of land situate, lying and being at EaSt Marion' .~n ~he T~wn... of Southold, County of Suf£olk &~d State of New York, &~ :" bound~ and desuribed as follows~ the ~outhea~erl¥ co.er o[.[~and formerly o~ Daniel F. Brown and now or formerly O~ H~tie B '..'.,~, and ~URNXNG T~NCE .'~lon~ l~s ~f ~rown Nort~ 33 degrees 17 minutes 2S5.80 ~eet t% a con~etemonumen= at the southerly side land now o~ former:ly.~£ W.C ~rown~ THENCE along.1a .. s of W~. Brown North 60 degrees 00 minu~es East 123~60 fee~ to ~ c'oncre~e monument on =he easterly line of other property cf: ~h~ Vtllag of ~reenport; TB~NCE along l'~ of~e'" village of Gr~enpor~ South 3~ northerly line o~ ch~'~ D&T[; w~ nt~ ~n~.~. t ~ot~, ~t~m~'rms covmm C'ObIM~NTS '- :' PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS RICHARD CAGGIANO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF $OUTHOLD July 9, 2002 Patricia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel & Restaurant Located on SR 25 in East Marion SCTM#1000-35-2~14 & 15.1 Zone: LB/R-80 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, July 8, 2002: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency, makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~ Chairman Encl. PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKi, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS RICHARD CAG.GL~qO P.O. Box 1179 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant July 8, 2002 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southoid Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Hellenic Hotel & Restaurant SCTM#: 1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Location: SR 25, East Marion SEQR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted (X) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No (X) Description of Action: Demolish existing cabins and construct 12 duplex hotel units with a pool and spa in an LB/R-80 Zone. There will be no changes to the existing restaurant. Reasons Supporting This Determination: An Environmental Assessment Form has been submitted and reviewed, and it was determined that no significant adverse effects to the environment were likely to occur should the project be implemented as planned. There has not been any correspondence received from the Department of Health Services Office in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. SEQR Negative Declaration - Page Two There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: Contact Person: Victor L'Eplattenier Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (631)765-1938 CC; Roger Evans, DEC Stony Brook Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Planning Commission Suffolk County Water Authority NYS Dept. of Transportation Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk Zoning Board of Appeals Building Department Applicant Part 2~ROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR~AGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completin8 the form the reviewer should be 8uided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been rea~onable~' The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possibJe the threshold of masnitude that would tri~er a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds ma'/be appropriste for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requirin8 evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as ~uidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds £o answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifyin~ impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes If there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yee to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance, Identifying an Impact In column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yea box In column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical chan~e to the project site? INS [3YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parkin8 area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing 8round surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil} per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site~ (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc,~NO E]YES · Specific land forms: 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [:]Yes [-iNo [] [] [:]Yes ~]No [] [] []Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E~Yes [~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER 3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected;~ (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) MNO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4 Will proposed action affect any nomprotected existing or new body of water~ IINO ~]YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity~ I~NO ~IYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action wilt require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts:. 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ I~NO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes ~No [] [] E]Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] I-lYes []No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No B ~ BYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No B ~ BYes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? reNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use.' · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? mNO rqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · Other impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ~INO [YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age} or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? reNO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land {includes cropLand, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E]Yes I-]No [] [] E]Yes E3No [] [] [~Yes E~No [] [] [~Yes E-]No [] [] r-lyes E]No [] [] ~Yes ~No [] [] E]Yes I'-I No [] [] E]Yes I--iNo [] [] I-lYes E]No [] [] E]Yes EiNo [] [] E]Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] E3Yes E3No [] [] I-lYes E]No [] [] E]Yes E3No [] [] E]Yes r~No [] [] E]Yes I"-INo · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~ MNO I-rYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix .B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding [and use patterns, whether man-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views.known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. ~Wi[I Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance[' reNO {:3YES Examp]es that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 reNO [:]YES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space important to the community. · Other impacts: -1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes ~lNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lyes []No [] [] []Yes i--INo [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes [-'INo [] [] []Yes C]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes I--INo [] [] [-']Yes []No [] [] (-1yes []No [] [] []Yes []No IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area {CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? reNO E3YES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation ~f the CEA. Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~INO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Wi]J proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? reNO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the mumcipality · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 10 · I '- 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes []No [] [] I~Yes []No [] [] I~Yes fi]No [] ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~es ~No ~ ~ ~Y~s ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~INO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting: within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts:. IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed ^ction affect public health and safety,~ ~INO E~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating:, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of Jiquified natural g:as or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community~ ~]NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or villag:e in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g:. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: ''1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] l-lYes I--lNg [] [] J~Yes r~No [] [] [~]Yes I~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] E3Yes r-lNg ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes DN0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No B ~ BYes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? IINO I-lYES Il any action in Part 2 Is Identified as a potential la,ge impact or If you cannot determine the magnitude of impact, proceed to Part 3 11 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS HELLENIC CABINS @ EAST MARION Prepared for: Prepared by: Victor L'Eplattenier Town of Southold Planning Board Office, Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971-0959 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, New York 11747 Date: May 24, 2002 The Town of Southold Planning Board has retained Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, LLC (NP&V) for consulting services in review of the above referenced application. The proposed action involves demolition of the existing structures (with exception of the existing restaurant) and the construction of 12 hotel/cabin units in six (6), one story buildings and an associated pool and spa. The plans reviewed herein are prepared by Young & Young Land Surveyors, dated July 20, 2001. A prior review of the EAF Part I was completed in June of 1999 for a similar but larger scale project on the site, involving the demolition of the existing structures, retention of the restaurant and the construction of an office building and four two story framed cabins containing a total of 20 units. The project has been significantly reduced in size and scope and as such, an updated Environmental Assessment Review and a new Determination of Significance is warranted. The updated EAF Part I has been reviewed and an EAF Part II has been prepared. It is noted that the EAF Part I and the Attachment to the EAF contains conflicting information with regard to water use, which will be further discussed below. This document analyzes the site and area resources including topography, soils, water, land use, zoning and transportation and other available information. Page I Hellenic Cabins EAF Part I Review Location and Project Overview The project site is located on the north side of Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A), west of The Long Way and Main Road intersection, better known as 5145 Main Road, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk. The site is 2.2846 acre in size, which includes a 0.7658 acre parking area (Parcel B) located to the east, and can be more particularly described as SCTM number 1000-35-02- 14 & 15. The property has approximately 409.87' of road frontage along Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A). The project site is entirely developed, with the only vegetation consisting of landscaping and maintained grass. The site does not contain wetlands or any known historically or ecologically significant resources. This review will discuss the proposed project and its potential impact on environmental resources. The site currently contains 19 structures, including an existing restaurant. The structures consist of two (2) storage buildings, a shower structure, and seventeen separate buildings or cabins, and a two story frame house which contains two apartments. The applicant proposes to demolish these structures (with the exception of the restaurant) to allow for the construction of 12 hotel/cabin units in six (6), one story buildings and an associated pool and spa. Access to the site will occur at two points along the properties road frontage, containing a semi-circular drive within. Fourteen (14) additional parking stalls will be added along the access drive to accommodate the proposed structures, with additional paved walkways between the buildings, restaurant. No construction/disturbance will occur within the 0.7658 acre leased parking area (parcel B) provided for the existing restaurant. Land Use and Zoning The site is zoned "LB" Limited Business, which requires a minimum lot size of 80,000 SF, or just slightly less than 2 acres. Therefore, the site would meet the required lot size in total but does not meet minimum lot size requirements exclusive of the 0.7658 leased parking area. Maximum permitted lot coverage within the "LB" zoning district is equivalent to 20% of the lot area (1.519 acres), or an approximately 13,233 SF building footprint. Under existing conditions, the building coverage yields approximately 17% and the proposed site coverage is not identified on the site plan. The minimum landscaped area allowed on site is 35%, or approximately 23,158 SF, and the landscaped area of the proposed project is not identified but appears as though it will meet this requirement. The area and pement coverage of landscaped area and building coverage should be identified on the plan. The current zoning allows a height of 2 1/2 stories (35 feet); the proposed structures are one story in height and therefore meet this dimensional requirement. The site is an existing non-conforming use within the LB district. The proposed project requires the following variances as indicated by the applicant: · Side Yard Variance for Units I & 2 · Rear Yard Variance for Units 3 & 4 · Rear Yard Variance for Units 5 & 6 · Rear Yard Variance for Units 7 & 8 · Side and Rear Yard Variances for Units 9 & 10 · Side Yard Variance for Units 11 & 12 · Side and Rear Yard Variances for Pool Page 2 Hellenic Cabins EAF Part I Review The Planning Board may wish to consider whether the project will require a minimum lot size variance, lot coverage variance and/or a landscaped area variance. The "LB" zoning district was developed to allow the construction of business uses along highways outside of the Central Business District. It was further intended that these uses would conform to the generally rural character of the surrounding areas, with emphasis placed on design. It should be noted that the present condition of the site is in an extremely deteriorated condition and does not conform to the general character of the area except that the use has existed for a long time. This "Limited" Business district was developed to allow commercial uses which were also not significant generators of traffic. It is expected that the redevelopment of this site would slightly reduce traffic generation rates as compared to that of existing conditions due to the decrease in the number of units. Land use in the vicinity is predominantly residential, with a Golf and Country Club located adjacent to the sites north and west property boundary. Additional small business uses are located on the south side of Main Road. Zoning in the vicinity is generally a reflection of the existing land use. Generally, R-80 zoning lies to the north, east and west of the site, with R-40 zoning to the south. Soils and Topography The site is relatively flat throughout, with all existing and proposed slopes of between 0-10%. The property does not contain any significant landforms or geological features. The entire site is developed, with pervious areas consisting of landscaping/turf. Haven Loam (HaA, 0-2% slopes) is the only soil type present on site. The Haven Loam series is described within the Suffolk County Soil Survey as land which is suitable for development, with good leaching potential. Although Haven soils with shallow slopes (0-2%) are not classified within groups 14 of the NYS Agricultural Land Classification System, they are fertile aghcultural soils. There are no wetlands on site or adjacent to the property. The topography and soils on site do not appear to present severe development constraints. Water Resources Public water is supplied to the site by the Suffolk County Water Authority. There is a 10 inch main along the north side of Main Road (NYS Rte. 25A), with several fire hydrants in the vicinity. The Islands End Well Field & Pump Station is located adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site, with the nearest well within this particular well field located roughly 1,000 feet to the northeast of the parcel. The applicant has indicated that there are no private well fields within 150 feet of the subject site. Additionally, the applicant requested a letter of water availability from the SCWA on January 7, 2002 and has indicated that the water authority has consented to the connection. It is recommended that the applicant forward the consent of the water authority to the Planning Board and our attention. All on site sanitary disposal is currently managed by on-site underground sewage leaching systems. In 1978, the Long Island Regional Planning Board published The Long Island Page3 Hellenic Cabins EAF Part I Review Comprehensive Waste Treatment Management Plan (208 Study). The 208 Study identified eight (8) hydrogeologic zones in Nassau and Suffolk Counties. These zones were distinguished based upon differences in underlying groundwater flow patterns and water quality. The subject site is located within SCDHS Groundwater Management Zone IV, which according to Article IV, has an allowable flow of 600 gallons per day (gpd) per acre. Therefore, the allowable nitrogen bearing flow for the approximately 1.52 acre portion of the development project is 912 gpd. The sanitary design flow is computed using SCDHS manual Standards for Approval of Plans and Construction for Sewage Disposal Systems for Other Than Single Family Residences. The manual establishes the design flow as follows: Restaurant 70 seats @ 30 gpd/seat 2,100 gpd Cabins 12 units @ 150 gpd per unit 1,800 gpd (assuming each unit is less than 600 s.f. in size) TOTAL 3,900 gpd It is recognized that not all flow produces nitrogen, therefore the estimated flow produced by the restaurant kitchen (20 gpd/seat) can be removed from sanitary calculations, resulting in a flow of 3,220 gpd. Further, it is noted that a design flow of 225 gpd/unit is utilized for units between 600 s.f. - 1,200 s.f. in size, and a design flow of 300 gpd/unit is utilized for units over 1,200 s.f. in size. As previously stated, a discrepancy exists with regard to water use and is reported on the EAF as 5,730 gpd (12 units @ 30 gpd/seat and 71 seats @ 30 gpd) and on the Attachment to the EAF as 4,367 gpd with sanitary flow estimated at 3,930 gpd (12 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seats @ 30 gpd/seat). Regardless, the anticipated sanitary flow rate exceeds the SCDHS sanitary discharge. It is noted that the SCDHS approved the request for a waiver on September 3, 1998 to allow the construction of 20 cottage units, 810 s.f. of office space, and the operation of a full- service restaurant serving a maximum of 70 seats stating only that the applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Resources with regard to water supply. This may be due to the seasonal and or intermittent nature of the proposed use. The elevation of groundwater beneath the subject site is roughly 3 feet above mean sea level (msl) according to the 1997 SCDHS water table map. The topographic elevation on site ranges from approximately 21-27 feet above msl, not including the leased portion of the site. Therefore, the minimum depth to groundwater is approximately 18 feet. The direction of groundwater flow is towards the south. The depth to groundwater on site is not expected to have constraints on the location of septic systems on the parcel. Previously, the applicant was proposing to install 3 conventional septic tanks on site; the updated plans do not indicate the location and design of such. It has been indicated by the SCDHS that soils are acceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. Further, the applicant has indicated that a pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS; however, complete engineering cannot be completed until the Zoning Board has reviewed and approved the location of the units. Sanitary systems should be depicted on the site plan. Page 4 Hellenic Cabins EAF Part I Review SUMMARY In conclusion, the proposed project appears to be well-designed due to the reduction and clustering of the proposed structures. It has previously been reported that the site is not well maintained and does not conform to the character of the area. The proposed pr~ect has been significantly reduced in size and scope. In order to assist the Board, the ?llffwing summary items should be provided: II . the plan. 2. The Planning Board may wish to consider whether the project will require a minimum lot size,~ variance, lot coverage variance and/or a landscaped area variance. 3. It is recommended that the applicant forward the consent of the water authority to the :~'~fl~/~:~;q 4. Sanitary systems should bed~ If the Board finds that there a~ no potenta'al significant advj~'se impacts and ail prior issues ha,v,e b~.en s. atisfactorily addre~ative Declaration/~nay be appropriate at the Boards Page 5 PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765-4643 Margaret Rutkowski Secretary May 13, 2002 Nelson, Pope & Voorhis, 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747-2488 Att: Charles J. Voorhis LLC Re: Hellenic Hotel Southold Town Planning Board Dear Chick: In response to your April 15, 2002 letter to Victor L'Eplattenier, enclosed please find updated long EAF, Part I and Young & young's response to your request for additional information wherein he provides zoning dimensional/bulk requirements, etc. (we believe this had already been forwarded to you). The existing structures are connected to the Suffolk County Water Authority. The proposed reconstruction will be a reduction of water supply usage. The existing connection will require updating to assure compliance with current standards and the water authority has consented to our connection. With regard to the Health Department, the applicant obtained a variance for the restaurant and existing cottages (enclosed). The revised and reduced plan will be submitted for the Health Department approval but we can not complete the engineering until the Zoning Board has reviewed and approved the location of the units (i.e. variance). The Zoning Board can not review the plan until the SEQRA is completed. (We are stuck!) Victor was away so I was not aware of your April 15, 2002, if there is anything else you need please do not hesitate to contact anxious to improve season passes. me directly, my client is very his property before another summer Very truly yours, Patricia C. Moore cc: Planning Board //~ Tom Wolpert, Young & Young M. Giannaris PART 1--PROJECT INFORMAT~I # Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE- This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as Dart of the application for approval and may be subiect to further verification'and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Par~s 2 and 3, It is expected that completion of the full E.&F will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. ADDRESS '10.2.0. l'l in II'f'll Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: E]Urban E}lndustrial DForest ~Agriculture 2 Total acreage of project area: ~,~ acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or BrushJand (Non-a§ricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads, buildings and Other paved surfaces OCommercial DOther [~Residential (suburban) r~Rural (non4arm) PRESENTLY AFT~ C,~_~M PLETION acres ~ acres acres ~ ~). acres acres 0 acres acres O acres ~ acre5 O~ ~cres Other (Indicate type) L,~wns + la~lse~n,~ O,~ acres -- .~.O acres 3. What is predominant soil type[s) on project site? ~ -- H~/~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ a Soil drainage: ~WeU drained /OO % of s~te ~oderateJy well drained 0 % of site ~Poorlv drained ~ % of site b If any agricultural land is involved, how m~nv acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY5 Lapd Classification 5ys[em? ~.~, acres. (~ee 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings On project site? ~Yes ~o a Whet is depth to bedrockI _. ~,~. [in feet) S APproximate percentage of proposed pro)act site with slopes: ~,0-10% ~0-15% , t~I % ~i~15% or greater ~ % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contam a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the Nauonal Registers of Historic Places~ ~Yes J}l[.No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ~Yes ~l~i[No 6. What ~s the depth of the water table? I'/f-2,"Slin feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~Yes [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing oppor[unities presently exist in the project area? '~Yes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal llfe that is identified as threatened or endangered? EYes ~.No According to ~ + Identify each species 12. Are there any unique (~r unusual hand forms on the project site? [i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) []Yes [~o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r~Yes )~o If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ~lyes I~o 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I~/, t1:)i', a. Name of Stream.and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: ~$,A · a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~..Yes '~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~.Yes {~No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ~ii~fes I'-INo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? [:3Yes ~Jxlo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I'~Yes 20 Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? OYes ~,~1o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate} a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor '~- ~"~ acres, b Project acreage to bd developed: ~.. s'~ acres initially; ~ ~ "~ acres ultimately. c. Prolect acreage to remain undeveloped ~) acres. d. Length of project, in mimes: ~/-~. (If appropriate) f r , ~/,~1~, . e the p oject is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposea, f. Number Of off-street parking spaces existing ~J_~; proposed //~ "11' . /~ g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~"~' (upon completion of project)? h If residential: Number and type of housing units: Iv,~. One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium In~tia{ly Ultimately I Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height: ~1 width; ~"t~t_ lengt['.. I Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will OCCL~py is? ~'1~ ft. 2.'How much natural ma?aria] (i~'ock, earth, etc ) wirl be removed from O tons/cubic yards 3. V~ilt disturbed areas be reclaimed? ~'Yes ~No ~3N/A 7'O a. If yes. for what re?ended purpose is the site beinl~ reclaimed? 'l~r~,o~..~- b Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~.Yes ~No c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~.Yes DNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~, ~ acres· 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? DYes [:a~o A~.R. 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months. (including demolition)· 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _~ (number). month month. OYes b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? g Will blasting occur during constructionl I-Wes ii,No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~m~' 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this pyoject 11. Will project require relocation of any project5 or localities? : after project i~ complete year, [including demolition). year. D'lYes ~qo If yes. explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I--lyes J~No a. tf yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount , b Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13 Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~'Yes [~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes Explain 15 IS project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood pla n? [~Yes ~o 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~.Yes I~No a. I'f yes, what is the amount per month 4..~ tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~l~'Yes E3No c If yes, give name ~O~ ~~ ; location . ~~ d Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanita~ landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~aIS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 , 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste~ ~Yes ~o a. If ye~. wh~t is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years ~8. will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Yes ~No ~ C~ ~ 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more ~han one hour per day)? ~Yes ~o 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise ievels~ ~Yes 21. will projec~ result in an .acreage in energy use~ ~Yes . ~No If yes , ipdicate type(s) ~ ' ~ ' ~ 22 If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~.~, gallons/minute· 23. Total antlcipa~ed water usage per day ~ gallons/day. ~1 ~ 24 Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? ~Yes ~NO /Z If Yes, explain Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City. Town, Village Board ~Yes City. Town, Village Plannin8 Board ~ii~Yes E]No City, Town Zoning Board ~i~,Yes ~No City, County Health Department ~Yes ~No Other Local Agencies DYes Other Regional Agencies ~Yes ~.No State Agencies C3Yes ~No Federal Agencies ~]Yes [~O C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? t~'Yes I-INo If Yes, ind~c~ate decision required: (:]zoning amendment Jlil~oning variance (:]special use permit [~subdivision ~site plan I~nev~/revision of master plan [:]resource management plan r~other 2. What ~s the zoning classification(s)of the site? L.J~ ~/.,/ly~e~ ~f~/'t~'~J~ 3. what is the maximum potential d~velopment of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? ~ What is the maximum potential ' ~f ~ site if ~' development developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~es ~No 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning c[asslfications within a ~A mile radius of proposed action? 8 Js the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V, mile? J~Yes ~3No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? I~/._Z~_; a What iS the minimum lot size proposed~ ~J,~ ~ 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ~lyes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, edu. cation, police. fire protection)? ~.Y es ~No a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? J~Yes ONo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels~ ~Yes ~i~o a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? OYes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If [here are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuSS such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the:information provided above is true to the best of my)knowledge ..... If the action is in the Coasta~ Area, anf; ,~ are state agen ', complete the Coastal Assessment Form before procee~irtg witE this assessment. ,", COUNIY OF SUFFOLK RoaE~"r ,J. GAFF'NEY SUFFOLK COUNT~ EXECUTIVE DEPARTHENT OF HEALTH SERVICES September 3, 1998 CLARE B. BRADLEY, H.D., H.P.H. ACTING CONNISSlONER Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 Subject: C10.97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, n/s Main Road, East Marion, (t) Soutbold; SCTM: 1000-35-2-14 and 15.1 Dear Mr. Giarmasis: Enclosed is a copy of the Board of Review's findings, recommendations and determination concerning the subject application. Based on the information submitted, the Board granted the request for variance with the provisions indicated in the determination. The granting o{ this waiver does not imply that your application will be automatically approved. It is your responsibility to ensure that your application is complete; otherwise, your approval will be subject to unnecessary delay. //j_,~..fruly yours, C. Maloney, (_..--/Chairman Board of Review enclosure. CC: Board of Review - Riverhead James Bagg Patricia C. Moore, Esq. Young and Young Royal R. Reynolds, P.E. SUFFOLK CO UAq~ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Article 2, Section 220, Suffolk County Sanitary Code To: From: Subject: Clare B. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H. Acting Commissioner of Health Services James C. Maloney, P.E., Chairman, Board of Review Report of Findings and Recommendations of the Review Board Regarding: C10-97-12, Hellenic Snack Bar, n/s Main Road, East Marion, (t) Southold; SCTM: 1000-35.2-14 and 15.1 Applicant: Mr. John Giannasis The Hellenic Snack Bar 5145 Main Road East Marion, NY 11939 Notice of Hearing: July 27, 1998 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 Statement of Problem The proposed construction of 20 cottage units and an office building, which are to be utilized together with an existing restaurant, exceeds allowable equivalent density. In addition, the applicant wishes to convert the restaurant from single-service to full-service. Findings and Facts 1. Proposed development of a 1.52 acre parcel. 2. Site is in Groundwater Management Zone #IV. 3. Area is zoned limked business. 4. Public water is available from Suffolk County Water Authority. 5. Depth to groundwater is greater than seventeen feet. Reference Number: C10-97-12 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Decision/Page Two 6. Soils are acceptable at a depth of three feet below the surface. 7. Distance to nearest public water supply well is approximately 1,000 feet. Groundwater flow is to the south. 8. Proposal exceeds allowable equivalent density requirements by 312%. The proposal entails the operation of an existing 70-seat restaurant (700 gallons-per-day (GPD) of sanitary flow), demolition and reconstruction of 20 cabins (3,000 GPD), demolition of a house with two existing apartments and construction of an 810 square foot office (49 GPD). 10. The applicant is indicating that the existing use is more intensive than that proposed from a sanitary discharge standpoint. 11. There was a previous Board of Review decision with regard to the subject site. A hearing was held on April 12, 1985 in response to a request for a variance from density standards to expand an existing restaurant. A variance was granted based on the facts that the restaurant is seasonal only and will remain seasonal, the operation was paper service and will continue in that manner, the applicant will upgrade the septic system to serve the entire site and to meet existing standards ar the time of Board of Review approval. 12. The Office of Groundwater Resources is reviewing the proposed Water supply system. 13. The allowable sewage flow is 912 gallons-per-day (GPD). A sewage flow of 3,758 GPD is proposed with a kitchen flow of 1,420 GPD. 14. The existing restaurant was approved at 1,800 GPD. The acreage has decreased from the time of the previous submittal to the Board of Review. 15. The site had an approved temporary residence permit for 14 residence units; however, a site survey presented by the applicant's representative indicated the presence of 20 units. Applicant is asserting that the 20 units existed in 14 buildings and an additional residential structure. 16. Planning and Zoning Boards have not made a determination on the project and are awaiting departmental determination. 17. Applicant is requesting permission to operate a full-service restaurant. Reference Number: C10-97-12 Hearing Date: August 13, 1998 BOR Decision/Page Three Determination By a vote of 2 to 1, the Board determined to approve the request for a waiver to allow the construction of 20 cottage units, the construction of 810 square feet of office space and the operation of a full-service restaurant serving a maximum of 70 seats. The applicant must meet the requirements of the Office of Groundwater Reso~arces with regard to water supply. Date ~es C. Maloney, P.E., C!{~rman March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLEblIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Long EAF, Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to primary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District include the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Alignment & Dimensional Plan (Sheet 1 of 3) last dated August 8, 2001 indicates the following dimensions: Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Variance Required Units 1 & 2 N.A. 15.00' N.A. Side Yard Units 3 & 4 N.A. N.A. 20.42' Rear Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. N.A. 41.05' Rear Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A. 20.42' Rear Yard Side & Rear Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 26.00' Yard Units 11 & 12 N.A. 15.00' N.A. Side Yard Side & Rear Pool N.A. 15.94' 26.01' Yard Page 2 March 7, 2002 Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. ExistinR Site Use, etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for $ of the ! 7 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 15 feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, ! residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 12 unit hotel complex. The proposed structures include retaining the existing restaurant, 12 new hotel units in 6 buildings, pool and spa. The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the hotel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 15 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 3,930 gpd. (12 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 4,367 gpd. Informational Details and Water Supply Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. Page 3 March 7, 2002 A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 17, 2001). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. PATRICIA C. MOORE Attorney at Law 51020 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Tel: (631) 765-4330 Fax: (631) 765~,643 March 11, 2002 VIA HAND DELIVERED Southold Town Planning Board 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Hellenic Snack Bar Dear Sir or Madam: In connection with the above referenced matter, enclosed please find the Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form. PCM/mm Enclosure Very ~12;~ yours, ~-P~ricia C. Moore MAR 1 1 2002"-- Southold Town Planning Board March 7, 2002 Attachment to Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF) HELLENIC SNACK BAR at East Marion, T/O Southold, New York Lomz EAF. Section B.25 A variance is required from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals for setbacks to primary building structures. The dimensional requirements of the LB-Limited Business Zoning Use District include the following: Front Yard Variable Side Yard 20' Rear Yard 75' The Alignment & Dimensional Plan (Sheet 1 of 3) last dated August 8, 2001 indicates the following dimensions: Structure Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Variance Reauir~d Units 1 & 2 N.A. 15.00' N.A. Side Yard Units 3 & 4 N.A. N.A. 20.42' Rear Yard Units 5 & 6 N.A. N.A. 41.05' Rear Yard Units 7 & 8 N.A. N.A. 20.42' Rear Yard Side & Rear Units 9 & 10 N.A. 15.00' 26.00' Yard Units 11 & 12 N.A. 15.00' N.A. Side Yard Pool N.A. 15.94' 26.01' Side & Rear Yard Page 2 March 7, 2002 De~crintion of Existin~ and Proposed Site Use. etc. Existin~ Site Use. etc. The existing site uses include a restaurant, single family dwelling, and cabin rentals. The existing structures include a restaurant building, a 2 story frame house, and 17 separate buildings or cabins. The restaurant operates 11 months per year and the single family residence and rental cabins are occupied on a seasonal basis. The side yard setbacks for 5 of the 17 cabins are less than 5 feet. The rear yard setbacks for 4 of the 17 cabins are less than 15 feet. The sanitary flow for the existing facilities is estimated at 4,980 gpd. (17 cabins @ 150 gpd, I residence @ 300 gpd, and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd seat). The existing water usage is estimated at 5,533 gpd. ProPosed Site Use. etc. The proposed site uses include a restaurant and 12 unit hotel complex. The proposed structures include retaining the existing restaurant, 12 new hotel units in 6 buildings, pool and spa. The restaurant will continue to be open 11 months per year and the hotel units will be available on a seasonal basis. The minimum side yard setback for the proposed structures is 15 feet. The minimum rear yard setback for the proposed structures is 20 feet. The sanitary flow for the proposed facilities is estimated at 3,930 gpd. (12 units @ 150 gpd and 71 seat restaurant @ 30 gpd/seat). The proposed water usage is estimated at 4,367 gpd. Informational Details and Water SuPPlY Narrative 1. Refer to Description of Existing and Proposed Site Use, etc. The proposed method of water supply is public water connection to the existing water main owned and maintained by the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) adjacent to the site. The nearest public well field (SCWA) is situated more that 1,000 feet away and upgradient from the proposed sanitary systems. There are no known private water supply wells within 150' of the proposed sanitary systems. Page 3 March 7, 2002 A letter of public water availability has been requested from the SCWA (refer to Young & Young letter dated January 7, 2002). A response is expected in the near future. A pending application is being reviewed by the SCDHS under H.D. Ref. No.: C10-97-12 (refer to SCDHS Notice of Incomplete Application - Commercial dated December 17, 2001). The proposed water conservation measure include the following: Co the use of drought tolerant plants for landscaping, the preservation of existing native vegetative buffers to the extent possible, the use of low flow plumbing fixtures in all proposed facilities. SUt:I:(.J~[~COtJN-F5 DEPARTMENT OF [IE..\I.'['il OFFICE OF WASTEW..VI'ER MANAGEML., 1 SUFFOLK COIINTY CENTEI~ Il IVFRHEAD. NEW YORK 1190I NOTICE (631) 852-2100 GMZ NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION - COMMERCIAL Your submission for the referenced project h~ been reviewed. This office will require the following for further review and/or approval: Completed Application WWM-004 ~ Processing Fee $ SEQRA Determination Wetlands Permit or Waiver - NYSDEC / Town Town / Village Zoning Letter Restrictive Covenants for: ~,,SPDES Application Form D/~P--~5-01~ Well Water Analysis Public Water / S='.'"-': ,Availability Letter Engineering Report (Subdivision) Approval Water Quality Approval Pollution Control AppFoval SCDPW Approval Review Board Determination P.E. / R.A. Certification of Existing Sanitary System Certificate of Authorization or Disclaimer INFORMATION MISSING AND/OR CORRECTIONS REOUIRED ON PLANS Suffolk County Tax Map Number Metes and Bounds Description Lot Size [ ] Key Map Distance to Cross Street Location. Date, & Results of Soil Borings / Test Holes ::~Floor Plans Gross Floor Area of Building(s) All Surface Waters Within 300 ft. Topographical Contours (5 ft. interval) Neighboring Wells and Sewage Systems Within 150' Of Property (or specify that there are none) Signature & Seal of Design Professional 5" x 7" Clear Area for Department Approval Storm Drainage Structure Locations Gallons/Day/Acre Sewage Discharge Sewage Disposa:l Design Calculations Location of Sev,,age System Profile / Details of Sewage System Sewage System Invert Elevations Expansion Area for Leaching Pools Water / Sewer Service Line Locatiom. s~ Private Well Detaits and Location Profile / Details / Location of Water Supply System Existing Buildino, Sewage / Water System Location(s) [ ] Project does not conform to Department standards See enc osed ~ pre ~ouslv sent Nonce of Non-Contormance. t ~ /tz'~,v '- . . PLEASE RETURN A COPY OF THIS FORM WITH ANY RESUBMISSION(S) Bob Kassner Southold Planning Board Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 NELmON, POPE & VOORHIB, LLC CHARLES J VCORHIS CEP, AICP * ARTHUR J KOERSER, RE · VINCENT G. DONNELL~, RE. VICTOR ~ERT, PE. · JOSEPHpAuLR. EPIFANIA.M. RAczPE'ePL.sROBERT December 13,20011~ 13E:C 2UU1 Re: Southold Town Planning Board Hellenic Cabins Revised Submission Review SCTM 1000-35-02-14 NP&V #99074 Dear Bob: As per your request, we have completed a preliminary review of the revised project plan submitted to the Planning Board. The plans that we have in our files are identified as follows: · Hellenic Snack Bar, prepared by Young & Young, dated July 20, 2001 (3 sheets; alignment and dimensional plan, existing conditions, building overlay plan. In addition, we are in receipt of an Environmental Assessment Form Part I, dated 3/5/99, as well as ll"x17" sections of floor plans and elevations prepared by Dominick Salvati & Son. No further information has been referred to this office for review to date. Based on this information, it is apparent that the applicant has scaled back the project to a significant degree. The project now includes 12 hotel units, rather than the 20 cabin units and future office as denoted on the prior plan. The project contemplates the demolition of 18 structures which includes a 2-story house, 7-structures identified as cabins, and 10-frame buildings. The prior application ..........' p.~v~a,.~n of a Enviromental ~pact Statement, due to potential si~fic~t adverse enviromental impacts including: · Sanitary wastewater discharge, hydrologic considerations, and potential groundwater impacts; · Excess coverage, a large number of variances, compatibility, land use and zoning issues: · Traffic analysis; and · Soil Analysis. The proposed project has been dramatically changed and reduced in size and scope, and therefore merits further review, with possible consideration of the issuance of a new 572 WALT WHITMAN ROAD, MELVILLE, NY 1174'7-'Eq'B'B Hellenic Cabins December 13, 2001 Determination of Significance. It is recommended that additional information be requested of the applicant to assist in the completion of this review. The following items are requested: · New EAF Part I with accurate information. It appears as though the EAF that was submitted, corresponds to the NP&V corrected EAF from the prior review. As a result, coverages, trip generation, water use, and other pertinent information is not consistent with the project proposed at this time. Explain nature of variance requested in Section B. 25. of the EAF. · Provide a table of zoning dimensional/bulk requirements, as compared with proposed dimensions for parking, setbacks, coverage, landscaping, height, etc. · Provide explanation of existing site use, occupancy, structures, setbacks, sanitary flow, water use; compare to proposed use, occupancy, structures, setbacks, sanitary flow, water use. · Indicate the source of water supply. · If public water supply is proposed, indicate the ability of the water utility to provide water supply to the project. Provide letter of water availability or detailed explanation of status of review by water utility. · If private water supply is proposed, indicate the well specifications, water quality based on on-site water quality data. Provide Suffolk County Department of Health Services approval or detailed explanation of status of review by agency. This information would greatly assist the Planning Board and our office in evaluating the project. I note that our file contains little up-to-date information, and therefore would request that if revised site plans, EAF's or other pertinent information has been submitted that it be supplied for review. Upon receipt of the information noted above, I would suggest that we perform the following services: · Review EAF Part I; · Prepare EAF Part II; · Provide environmental planning review; and · Provide recommendation concerning environmental significance of the action. Initial review does find that the reduced scope project greatly reduces many of the potential impacts identified in the prior review. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this preliminary review. If you have any questions or wish any further input with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Page 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 14, 2001 Patricia C. Moore 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Hellenic Hotel & Restaurant SCTM# I000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Mrs. Moore, The Planning Board has received the enclosed report from its environmental Consultant. It is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, please call this office. Site plan Reviewer December l~, 2001 Bob i(Lasmer SouthoJd, PL.*ming Bo~t Tov~ Hall. 5~09~ Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Sou~bold, NY 11971 H~ll~nio Cabins SC'TM 1000-35-02-14 NP&V ~9~074 Dear Bob: Aa per your request, w: have completed a prelimL,~ review of the ~vised l~oject plan submitted to the Plauning Board. The ptan~ that we have'in our file~ are identified as follows: Hellenic Sna~k Bar, ixcpa.,~l by Young & Young, dated. July 20, 2001 (3 sheets; sUgnment and dimensional plan, existing comlit/ons, buildiag ovur¼y pl~. addition, we m-e in rec~.ipt of an Environmental Assr,mt Form P~ I, ~ 3/~/99, u well 1 1'~17' ~flOm of floor pl~s ~ clcy~ ~ by Domi~k 8~ ~ S~. No ~er ~fo~aflon ~'be~n ref~ ~ ~s office ~r ~ to ~. ' Bas~ on thia i~formation, il is apparent tha~ lbo applicant has scaled back the project to a significaut degree. Thc project now includ~ 12 hotel uni~ rather than thc 20 cabh units attd future office as &,noted on the prior plan. The .project contemplates the demolition of 18 structures which [uclud~ a 2-story house. 7-struotur~ idvntified as cabins, and 10-frame bo, ildings. The prior application had received a Positive Dm, hratinn, requiring the .ptepan~o~ of'a Environmental Impact'Statemem, due to potelllial'si?ificant adverse c~vlronrnental impacts including: · Sanitary wastcwater dLscha~ge, hydrologic.consi&rations, and poteni~,l groundwater impacts; * Excess coverage, a large number of vr. rialces, compatibillty,'lf~d ~ lind zon~g isles; * Tra~*~¢ ansll/ms; · Soil A~lysls. The proposed project has been dramatically changed sM reduced in size and scope, and therefore merits further revi~v, with possible eonddaration of the issuance of a new ltsll~le Cnblns Dtcemb~ ~3, ~01 Demminatiou of si~ificar, ce. lit is recommended tim additional kfformaiion be'r~ue~ted of ~he ~pplicant to assi~ in the completion ofthls review, The following items a~¢ requesled: New EAF Pm'~ I with ~curate information. It a~ ~ ~ ~e E~ ~t ~ con.ponds ~ ~e ~&V co~d ~ ~om ~e p~or ~cw. ~ a res~ w*~s, at t~s ~e. E~ n~e of v~ce x~u~ed in S~ B. 25. of ~c ~. ~de a table of ~B dim~sio~u~ ~cm~ ~ com~ ~th pr~os~ di~sions for par~. setback, cave.ge, ~nd~pi~, ~ight, c~, ~vide e~l~on of e[is~8 site u~, e~ap~cy, s~cs. s~c~, ~i~ flow, ~ use; c~arc ~ ~op~d usc, ~o~y, s~c~es, ae~a~, sani~ flow, wa~ ~e. ~ public wa~ s~ply is pm~d, ~ ~e abil~ of ~e wa~ u~li~ ~ ~de ~ s~ply to ~e ~oj~t. ~vide l~r of~t~ a~hb~ ~ ~il~ e~l~a~ca of~ of r~ew by wat~ u~iv. If~vatt wat~ su~ly is pr~os~, i~di~ ~ weU ~cifi~fio~, ~ q~Ii~ based on wa:~ q~li~ ~. ~o~ S~olk Co~ ~t of ~lth S~s ap~l ~ ~1~ cxpl~fion of s~ of te~ by ~cy, This information would greatly assist the plmming Board and our office in evaluagn~ the project. I note th~ our file contains liUle up-to.date lnfom~ation, ~d therefore would r~tuest that if revised site plans, BAF's or other pertinent information has been submitted tha~ it be supplied for rc¥iew, Upon r~ceip: of thc information notcd above, I would suggest that we peffom~ the following scrviccs: Review BAF Par~ I; · Provide environmental planning review; and · Provide recommenda6on concemin$ enviro~neniai si/nifican~e of the action. Initial review does find that the reduced scope project greatly reduces many of the potential im;~K:t8 lion. ed in th~ prior review, Thank you for tM opportunity to provide you with this preliminary review. If you have any question~ ot wish any further i~put with rclpmi to this mattcr, please do not hesitate to call. Very uuly yours, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATItAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 16, 2001 Patdcia C. Moore, Esq. 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel & Restaurant SCTM#1000-35-2-14 & 15.1 Dear Ms. Moore: The following resolution was adopted by the Southoid Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, October 15, 2001: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board start the lead agency coordination process on this unlisted action. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Very truly yours, .~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI~ JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 1197].-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment F°rm ( ~,~t° ass~eu i.n, y°ur~eT°~.~, Project Name: ./(_~.~.~'~ '~? ~ ~.Y'~ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I {~ Unlisted Contact Person: ~.4'~'~, ~/~-~'~/~'/~,, (631) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: (,X) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Please feel free to contact this office for further information. ..~_.~ry truly yours, Chairman CC; Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook ~,ugolk ~o.ntv Dep~r~m~r~t of P"-~!!C '.¥C.'k~ New York State Department of Transportation Thomas Cybulski, Greenport Public Utilities David Abatelli, Greenport Village Administrator Suffolk County Water Authority *Maps are enclosed for your review PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR, RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 ,2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Requeet Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (~° ass>~u i.n, your~eT°ns?/ Requested Action: SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I ~ Unlisted Contact Person: (631) 765-1938 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Poaition: (~) This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other (see comments below) Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Chairman cc: Board of Appeals Building Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Department of Health Services NYSDEC - Stony Brook U,S. ~-my "'"'--.--,. :f New York State Department of Transportation Thomas Cybulski, Greenport Public Utilities David Abatelli, Greenport Village Administrator Suffolk County Water Authority "Maps are enclosed for your review PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Gerard P. Goelminger, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer f6( RE: Hellenic Hotel Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-101-1-10 DATE: September 21,2001 The following is in response to your September 21, 2001, request for the status of the above project. The applicant filled a revised site plan for twelve hotel units on July 31, 2001. The original coordinated review under SEQRA for the twenty-unit project was started on February 8, 1999. A resolution of July 19, 1999, requested that a Part III be prepared. The project ended at this point. We plan to start the coordinated SEQRA review on the new project on October 15, 2001. We will coordinate with your department as an involved and interested agency. APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman James Dinizio, Jr. Lydia A. Tortora Lora S. Collins George Horning BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD INTER-DEPARTMENTAL TOWN MEMO /:% Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ZBA Fax (631) 765-9064 Telephone (631) 765-1809 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Board Attn: V. Scopaz, Town Planner Jerry Goehringer, Chairman, Zoning Board of Appeals September 21, 2001 Site Plan Reviews- Proposed Hotel Units (35-2-14) GiannarislHellenic Restaurant Property The Board of Appeals has received a new application (Appl. No. 5019 filed September 7, 2001) requesting multiple variances for various building setbacks relative to a proposed Hotel Project, replacing existing structures at the above property. A public hearing has not been calendared; a determination under the Environmental Review process by the Planning Board was not issued, we understand. Please be aware that it is possible that setback variance projects may be a Type II Action under SEQRA, however, coordination by the Lead Agency is requested with the Board of Appeals as an involved and interested agency. Please confirm whether the applicant has submitted a site plan application for the proposed hotel units or other status with the Planning Board. Thank you. Southo!d Plannln Board PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMEBS K~NNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE ToWN OF SOUTHOLD August 21,200l Patricia C. Moore Attorney a~ Law 51020 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Proposed Site Plan for Hellenic Hotel Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-101-1-I0 Dear Mrs. Moore, The Planning Board has received the enclosed report from the Architectural review Committee. It is being sent to you for your attention. If you have any questions, or if you wish to have a presubmission conference on the lot line or site plan, please contact this office. Encl. Cc: Garrett Strang, Robert Brown, Co-Chairs Architectural Review Committee SOUTHOLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE August 14, 2001 The ARC met at Town Hall at 4:30 p,m,, Members present were: Garrett A. Strang, Co-Chairman Robert Ii Brown, Co-Chairman Howard G. Meinke, New SuffolkJCutchogue Theodore Carpluk, Southold Herbert Ernst, Southold Sanford Hanauer, Mattituck Robert Keith, Mattituck, Secretary Also attending were Robert G. Kassner of the Planning Board staff, Ms. Patdcia C. Moore for Hellenic Hotel, Ms. Paula Radke, Frank Murphy, and Rick Campos, R. A. for Grace's Place Day Care Center, as well as Paul Comzzini and Joseph Fischeffi for the Corazinni Storage Building. Moved by Howard Meinke and seconded by Herbert Ernst, it was RESOLVED to APPROVE the MINUTES of the meeting of July.26, 2001, ........ committee AYes' "" ' ' Vote of the :' All; HELLENIC HOTEL (Main Road - East Marion) PreliminarY. Discussion. Ms. Moore 'described the replacement of the cottages with units consisting of a living room, bedroom, bath, kitchenette, and basement to be finished with brown vinyl shakes, white trim, and gray asphalt shingles. The Committee asked for the following information: whether the electdc service will be buded, the transition between the siding and the glass blocks, the meaning of the cross hatching on certain windows, the manufacturer of the vinyl siding, catalogue cuts of exterior building mounted lighting fixtures, the type of heating and location of vents, and the screening for the air conditioning. The Committee suggested: longer front windows, screening of the service area on four sides, 4" or wider casements around the windows, a darker roof color, and a 6 in 12 pitch on the roofs and reverse gables · Secretary PLAI~I~[NG BOARD MEMBERS BI~.NNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIAN0 Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 August 7, 2001 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Charles J. Voorhis, CEP, AICP Nelson Pope & Voorhis 572 Walt Whitman Road Melville, NY 11747-2188 Site plan for Hellenic Hotel Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 Dear Mr. Voorhis, The Planning Board has received the enclosed revised site plan and LEAF on the above project, As discussed, the plan was prepared for the ZBA variance and is incomplete for Planning Board review. The documents are sero to you for your records and information only. When the complete site plan is received if will be forwarded to you for your review and recommendation of determination. If you have any questions, please comact this office Site Plan reviewer Ends ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MAB2,JAGE OFFICER RECORDS 5&~NAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (631) 765-6145 Telephone (631) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 6, 2001 The Southold Town ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE will meet on T~lph~da¥~ August 14~ 2001 at 4:00 P.M. in the Planning Board Office at Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York. AGENDA Hellenic Hotel Southold Town Clerk Committee Members Town Board Town Attorney Chief of Police Supt. of Highways Departments Newspapers Radio News 12 AUG o 7 ~0/ SouthoId Town Planning Board ~ATFIICIA C. MOOI=I~ 510L::~) MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NY 11971 (518) ~5-43,-~0 ?~ Southold Town Pl.nnlnn I:~,rrl PATRIOIA O. MOORF= 510L:~0 MAIN F:IOAD, ~)LITHOLO, NY I lrl71 (!~11~) AU; 0 ~ Southold Town PLANNING BOARD MEMB~ BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR. Chairman WILLIAM J. CREMERS KENNETH L. EDWARDS GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM, JR. RICHARD CAGGIANO Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1938 Fax (631) 765-3136 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: FROM; RE: DATE Edward Forrester, Director of Code Enforcement Robert G. Kassner, Site Plan Reviewer ~ Hellenic Tourist Camp and Snack Bar Main Road, East Marion SCTM# 1000-35-2-14 February 8, 2001 A site plan application for the above project has been submitted to the Planning Board and calls for the demolition of the existing cabins and their replacement with six new buildings containing a total of twelve units. As this use is non-conforming in this Limited Business Zone and there is a question when the cabins were last occupied and the fact that they will all be demolished in this project, the Planning Board requests a decision on whether the applicant can continue the use. Please respond in writing to this request. Please feel free to contact this Board or the Board of appeais during your research, ) 617,20 Appendix A State-Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used fo evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: E~ Part 1 r'"] Part 2 r~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if ap?opriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonab!y determined by the lead agency that: r--~A. The project will not result in any large important imkact(s) and, one not have a and therefore, is wh(ch significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared? The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. *A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 -) ) PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County) Name of Applicant/Sponsor Address Ci~/PO Business Telephone State z'~ Zip Code Name of Owner (if different) Address City/PO Business Telephone Description of Action: State Zip Code Page 2 of 21 Please ,Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A: SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present Land Use: r-'] Urban [] Industrial [] Commercial r~ Forest []Agriculture NOther E~ Residential (suburban) r'-'] Rural (non-farm) Total acreage of project area: J* ~' acres. ~PI APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brush[and (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24,25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) '~,~,4/77' ~ ~/~3~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION ,~ acres O acres ~-) acres ~) acres ~ acres O acres ~) acres ~ J acres ~ ~ acres ~ acres /,~ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site?' J~-¢¢~ ~ ~ a. Soil drainage: r~weli drained ~O % of site r'~Poorly drained ~ % of site ['~Moderately well drained ~) % of site. b. If any agricultural land is invoJved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? ~V,~ acres (see I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? r'~ Yes [] No a. What ia depth to bedrock ~V, ~ (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~'~0'10%/00 % r~lo-1§% ~) % [~ l§% or greaterC~ % 6. Is project substantial~ontiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places7 [] Yes [] No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? 8. What is the depth of the water table?~'~- ~,~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~ Yes r'-] No 1 o. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [] Yes r-lYes ~"~ N o F-~No Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? r~Yes [~No According to: ~denti~ eech species~ 1 2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations? ~Yes ~No Describe: 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r"J Yes [~JNo If yes, explain: 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [~Yes J~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, p,onds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): Page 4 of 21 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? [] Yes [] No a. If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection7 []Yes []No b. If YES, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? [~Yes []No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ~--'j Yes liNe 19. Is the site located in 0r substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ~']Yes [~]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposel of solid or hazardous wastes? B. 1. Project Description Physical dimensions and scale of project {fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: b. Project acreage to be developed: ~,~ 3 acres initially; c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: ~:) acres. d. Length of project, in miles: ~(':~ (if appropriate) ~]Yes ~ No acres. ecresu,t,m;,e, g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: ~/~ One Family Two Family Initially Multiple Family Condominium Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: ~' height; j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc. J will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed r~Yes r~No [] NIA a. Jf yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? width; ft. length. tons/cubic yards. b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~?]Yes [] No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [] Yes [] No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? Page 5 of 21 d. Will blasting occur during construction? [] Yes [] No Number of jobs generated; during construction Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r-"] Yes J~No if single phase project: Anticipated period of construction: __ months, (including demolition) If multi-phased: Total number of phases anticipated /' (number) Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: f month ~J~year, (including demolition) Approximate completion date of final phase: ~/m~on~t~' __ year. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ~'~ Yes ~ No 9. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? []Yes after projsct is complete r~No If yes, explain: 12. Is surface liquid Waste disposal involved? ~ Yes r-~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved7 ~ Yes ~'~ No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? r~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? r~ Yes ~]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? r~ Yes [] No a. If yes, what is the amount per month? ~,-.~ tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ~'~ Yes [] No o. yea. g ve .eme ocet on d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? []Yes Page 6 of 21 If yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste7 ~[]Yes [~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life7 __ years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? []Yes J~No ~,~e~' ,~ ~ ~) 19, Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~'~ Yes~] No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [] Yes [] No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? [] Yes [] No If yes, indicate type(s) 22. if water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~,, ~O~:~ gallons/day. ~' 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? r'~ Yes [] No If yes, explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board ~'~ Yes [] No Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Planning Board ~'~Yes [~No 2.o03 City, Town Zoning Board City, County Health Department ~'~ Yes Other Local Agencies r'-] Yes [] No Other Regional Agenc~s r~ Yes [] No State Agencies r~ Yes [] No Federal Agencies r~ Yes [] No Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? []Yes [] No If Yes, indicate decision required: [] Zoning amendment [] Zoning variance [] New/revision of master plan [] Site plan r'-] SpeciaJ use permit [] Resource management plan [~ Subdivision [~ Other Page B of 21 2. What is the zoning classification{si of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the s*te if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [] Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(sD and zoning classifications within a ¢ mile radius of proposed action? ['~No 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a A mile? 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? [~Yes [] No Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [] Yes ~ No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection? If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [] Yes [] No 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. OYes D. Informational Details ]Yes [] No r"lNo Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Signature If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding w;th this assessment. Page 10 of 21 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site Plans SPFile Type: Approved Project Type: Amended Site Plans Status: Final- Pehding Inspection SCTM #: 1000- 35.-2-14 Proiect Name: Hellenic Restaurant Address: 5145 New York State Road 25 ( Main Road) Hamlet: East Marion Applicant Name: John Giannaris Owner Name: Giannaris, George Zone 1: LB Approval Date: 9/13/2005 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related infoffnation End SP Date: 9/12/2005 Zone 2:R-80 Zone 3: Location: approximately 532' west of Shipyard Lane on the north side of New York State Road 25 SC Filing Date: C and R's: Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCANNED ~ecords Management_~_ SCAN Date: HELLENIO LEGATION HAP N NOTES X* N L~ ' \',\ '\ T~PIGAL ~HFLIB PLANTINg, " ', 'k, S ,,, ',,, ¢¢ ',, ',, o. , ', %%, >~¢ k,, ',,~%¢0~ ee ,, ,, " ¢.~0 T~PIGAL Tie. El= PLANTIN¢ PERM EGm (1/97) Young & Young 400 Ostw~de~' Ave~,~e, Riverhead, New York 631-727-2303 11901 PAVI~MI~NT, YCCNL~ * C, UP. BIN~ L~END ,4 51 i i~ DATA TOTAL A~A = J..~I~O A~,J~ = N.E,.V. DATUM ¢H.5.L. 1~2~) Application Is hereby made for a highway work permit: Cont~tpersonln~seofemaeency q z ~&¢ 'Y ~T~ ST.~ OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF TRANSF~' rATION HIGHWAY WORK PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NON-UTILITY WORK NamB PREPARE S COPIES (photocopies acceptable) Slate Zip 3. Protective Uabllliy Insurance covered by poJicy Ni Lead Agency PERMIT IS ISSUED CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL REQUIREMENTS BEING SATISFIED. PAVEMENT, I,"~IALI(.~ i CAJt~BIN~, 4 ~,ONSTRL~,TION I~ ~ =5 \ / / 0~ TH#I ¢¢ \ \ \ I / / / ! / / · 0? J / i \. \ \ \ \ \ / / \ \ \ \ \ DII~.AINA~E C.,AL~ULATION5 \ \ \ '\ N S ~0¢ ,~ Young & Young 400 Os~ra~der Avenue, R~verhead, Ne'w York 631-727-2303 11901 5ANITAI~¥ ~2ESICN ~1~1 i =~.IA ~ ¢~ALC4JLATION~ EN~,INEEt~.'5 C. EI~.TIFIC. ATION O~N~ JOHN ~IANNA~.I~ HELLENIC, 5NA~ BABI 5145 h4AIN ~ESTAU~NT HtELLt=NI¢ STAU NT Ab Ec~st M~rlon, To~n oP ~ou~¢hold Suffolk C. ount~, No~ York ZONE R.-40 I'qAINTENENd. F: ~ F:'I~,OTEG. TION OP TI~-AFt=IC. NE~ ASPHALT ~E~,TION ~ Y s ~.O.TJ ~Ed. TION (N.".5.~ o.v.> I~,E~I~,ATION 121=TAIL ~,ONT{ NUE EiXISTIN6 12" MiN. 1/4" -5/4"/PT. E~GTION CN.¥.~ o o T.) A~PHALT PAVL=I~'NT GOI'~'I'~J~TION NTS. L THE GDN~6TO~. DH~L EREDT IDOO ~T ADVANG:D PHAS~ Ii PLAN. NOTE: "F 400 Yo'~r~g & Yo'~,g ~ON~ i t~J.~TION NO i A~PHALT PAVEMIENT CONST~U~,TION: g~IVEI~Y CON~Tf~.UC, TION: LE~,EN~ EN~,INEER,'O C, ER, TIFIC, ATION JOHN ~IANNA~ID HELLENIC. DNA~ ~A~ 5145 HAIN EAST MAR. ION, NE~ YO~t~ IlqDq ~4E ~TAUt~.,ANT Ht LLt=NIC STAUR NT Du~olk ~oun[~, New York HAINTENAN~E $ F~OT~DTION OF TRAt~IC., PLAN ] N¥~IDOT C.a~ No: 04-84P ./, E 1=I~4-=NCH I::::'I~NIN ~EGTION NT~ NT~ CONGF~,E'r~. 51121EJ~[AL.K ~ECTION t Ft~,AME $ NT5 ~I~,A"I~ LOCATION ldl'rHIN FI~,ENOH Dt~,AIN ~;. ]0000000 ~ -'. ?- 00000000 · ':' ' .... ~ CATCH B~IN 2' x NT~ '///////////// bi iilll,,~,i,~iiiE,, ,i,~,,,E~ izl i i~ll i~11 Ell I~11 I~11 I~11 r~ A~PHALT PAVI~HENT SECTION NT5 ~TOI~t4 I'~IA'T'EI~ LEACHIN~ POOL NT5 Young & Young 400 Ostrander Aven~e, Rive~hea~ Ne~ York 631-727--2303 11901 CERTIFICATION ~O~N ~IANNARI~ ~1~ ~AIN ROA~ EAST MARION, NE~,I ¥O~K, IICTD, Cl RESTAU~,ANT HELLENIC, t :EOTAU NT At~ ~:omL ~lmrlon, tomln o~ ~ou[holct SuFfolk Goun[~, Nero York E, ount:~ Tax Hop ~1,~1~ I000 ~,,~ DD Bmo~kl2 L~ 14 DETA I/~, 1 J N'f¢[20T Coe~, No: 04-~4P