Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMattituck Waterfront Revitalization 2000Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization ./ Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization An Independent Project Contents 01 Manifesto 02 Introduction 03 Problem Statement 04 Project Statement 05 Problem Statement 06 Architectural Intentions 07 Site Identification 08 Regulatory Environment 09 Precedent Analysis 10 Design Process 11 Final Presentation 1 2 Bibliography Special Thanks to all who assisted me in any way through my years of study and particularly during this thesis: Mom and Dad Doug and Doreen... for their overwhelming love and support my family Uncle Frank...without you, none of this would have been possible Hasan-Uddin Khan Andrew Cohen Grattan Gill Spencer McCombe Bill McQueen Valerie Scopaz, Town of Southold George Solomon, Mattituck Chamber of Commerce Architecnologies Suffolk County Department of Transportation Defo, for using you computer till I finally got mine, it was all about 423. dedicated in loving memory of Beatrice Notaro "Grammy" March 5, 1923 to October 26, 1998 She always knew I could do it thanks Grammy MANIFESTO Ol MANIFESTO When questionmg what I believed architecture to be about I found myself reflecting back on my years of study to this point. As students we have been exposed to numerous points of view on architecture xvritten by all types of people. After compiling my thoughts, I began to see that they were fairly random and fragmented thoughts on what I thought architecture to be about. However, the one thing that linked all of these thoughts together was a sense of reahsm. The notion of realism involves developing an architecture that is creative and inventive while remaining conscious of the constraints and contextual fabric within it creates itself. Operating under realism does not declare a specific aesthetic or theoretical criterion for architectural development, but offers the challenge to develop a rational solution based on the particular situation or problem. There is not always an underlying reason that you do something. Sure, decisions thought the process of creating architecture are not made by just flipping a co'm, but perhaps architecture has tendencies that come from both previous examples and design theories. I found the question of "xvhy" always difficult to answer.· People xvho looked to the inner psyche to justify why they made a particular design solution always amused me. For me there was always a practical reason for doing something. Throughout my readings over the semester, I found a particular interest in comments made by Garrett Eckbo. He talks about architecture's contextual influences saying, "Design is not, or should not be, a preconceived system imposed on a local situation. It should be a local inspLtation (with any amount of external content) developed from the local situation. Good designers are both original and traditional. They bring modern up to date minds and talents to the analysis of specific situations." For him the historical situation ~ that he works within is of great importance and remarks that the better we understand 0'1 the environment that we are working in, the better we develop and improve upon it. Eckbo says that, "History is the body of tradition from which we start." on/y to make beautiful things - nor is it on[3' to make usefm things, it is to do both at once - like a tailor rvho makes clothes that both look gooa and fit mell. " Hertzberger Architecture has a particular responsibility to society. "Every intervention in people's surroundings regardless of the architects specific aims, has a so(mi imphcafion" 'The art of architecture is not (Hertzberger). Though it has the ability to make a strong impact on the way people exist socially; it should not attempt to exist over society. Architecture should be done for society and not for the sake of architecture. Garrett Eckbo continues to support the idea that the idea of an architecture that is socially sensitive saying, "The designer is observer, critic, and creator in society, not over it... They must overcome and reject the hubris which says that they are superior to and not a part of nature, and are therefore free to exploit and change as we will." Architecture is a great art that is based on the principles of making a structure that is functional and useful as well as aesthetically pleasing. It is .about solving the problem of making space and accommodating program by combining investigations into art and science in an effort to seek a solution that achieves Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization MANIFESTO firmness, commodity, and dehght. Just as each problem is unique to its own particular needs, each solution is developed from the conditions that the problem presents. Perhaps somettmes architectural investigations have focused on primarily art or fundamentally on science in order to solve the problem, but a complete architecture is conscious of both disciplines and stftves to achieve a synthesis by investigating in both an artistic and scientific domain. Exploring artistically and scientifically satisfy an academic frame of reference where the ideas of firmness, commodity, and delight serve as goals for the soludon to achieve. According to Vitruvius, "architecture is the union of firmness, commodity, and delight, ...Without solidity, it is dangerous; without usefulness, it is merely large-scale sculpture; and without beauty, it is no more than utilitarian construction. Fmrmess meets the need of being sound structurally and technically. Commodity calls for the solution to the problem to be econorracally and environmentally efficient, while being sensitive to the social context. And delight satisfies the necessity for the solution to be aesthetically pleasing, inventive, and fulfill the needs that have been previnusly set. The complete invesUgation into the architectural solution that embodies these ideas produces architecture that is an entire endty and complete within itself. Perhaps Hertzberger sums it up best saying, "If you think you can't make the world a better place with your work, at least make sure you don't make it worse. The art of architecture is not only to make beautiful things - nor is it only to make useful things, it is to do both at once - like a tailor who makes clothes that both look good and fit well." So what's a thesis? ?t thesis suggests a solution h) .t problem. Just as each problem is umque to its own particular needs, each soluuon Is developed the conditions that the problem presents. The thesis does not necessaU' imply that there is only one solunon for the problem, but it embodies an invesugative process in proposing a possible solution. With this m mind we can conclude that the architectural solution should evaluate what you are dohig and within ~vhat context you are doing it. In my particular situation there is both a need for beauty and utility. There extsts a problem with a discrete set of concerns and issues that calls for a complete solution. The site is such that the problem calls for a soludon that will be able to exist widmi the current fabric and yet respectfully transform and remtal/ze it thicougb architectural development. The goal is to gtVe the site a re use that, through an architectural means, would help revitalize the area both economically and socially, and to design an exemplar architectural environment, a strong sense of contextual surroundings and an inmate integration m the commUmty both on the physical and psychological level Will be key to the success of the solution. According Hubbard and Kimball, "the capacity to experience human pleasure is bom in d~e human mind." The rmnd of Hubbard and Kimball see the critical ingredient to satisfying the human nmad is a perception of umty in design. Such a umtT Is acbieved though, "completeness of organizanon" and is achieved by, "des~grmng a site as a series of self-contained, well-ordered msual components connected by axes or processional path." Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization MANIFESTO Tins thesis project will also seek to investigate the previously mentioned relationsinp between art and science, looking for analogous conditions and opportunities for response. For it is this combination of the arts and the sciences that yields architecture that is inventive while remaining conscious of the constraints and a contextual fabric within it creates itself. The independent project also provides a theater for the desire to invent and create. Stravinski states that, "Inventinn presupposes imagination but should not be confused with it. For die lack of invention implies the necessity of a lucky find and of achieving full realization of this find. What xve imagine does not necessarily take on a concrete form and may remain in a state of vLrmaEty, whereas invention is not conceivable apart from its actual being worked out." Being die inventor of a solution may better fit the title of architect and as invesngafions into the independent project develop further, it is the conceptual discoveries that may progress into architectural solutions to the problem. This idea of creation and invention could not only be valuable to the project's evolvement and sohidon, but could hold value to the project's programmatic development. The independent project's program serves as a vehicle to explore the axchitectural ideas of sequence, transition, simultaneity both visually and spatially, and the rehabilitation and development of public space. Perhaps the site may offer circumstances that could lead towards the development of an architectural response. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The small seaports along the northeast and mid-Atlantic coast are special places, rich with history and traditions of the sea. Their maritime heritage makes these small seaports appealing and distinctive to contemporary visitors. Ocean waters, beaches, boating, sport fishing, cool evening breezes, historic districts, lively waterfronts, and fresh seafood add to the attraction. For the many who flock to the coast for a summer's day or longer, the seaport town represents a welcome change of scenery and pace from the hectic urban and even suburban life and surroundings. Now these small seaport harbors are tourist havens in the summer months, ~ especially on the weekends. Distance from the population centers itself has spared the 02 onslaught of people somewhat. Every year hundreds of thousands of people travel to eastem Long Island to v~.cation, relax, and enjoy the many attractions it has to offer. East of Riverhead, the North Fork is made up of small towns that have established their individual place in the history of Long Island. The North Fork is known for its maritime and farming heritage, beaches, marshes, and quaint historic hamlets, Jamesport, Mattituck, New Suffolk, Cutchogue, Peconic, Southold, Greenport, and Orient. Surrounded by the Long Island sound to the north, Block Island Sound and Atlantic Ocean to the east, the North Fork is a fisherman's delight from boat, beach or pier. Just of the shore of Greenport and the South Fork are Shelter Island, a quaint small community and weekend getaway for many. Visitors to the North Fork take enjoy the many aspects of this wine growing, farming, and fishing community. The 13 award-winning wineries host informative tours and tasting year round. The North Fork Promotion council publicizes events (the North Fork Triathlon, Learn to Water-ski Day, Sailboat Regattas, Martimck Craft Fair, Mattimck Strawberry Festival, etc.) that bring in residents and visitors to the hamlet center. The annual Mattituck Strawberry Festival alone brings over 35,000 people into town during the three-day event. The charming natural beauty of this region makes the historic North Fork among the most appealing places to escape to on Long Island. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization INTRODUCTION The town of Southold, considered the oldest English settlement in New York State, was officially founded in 1640 by a group of English Puritans from New England led by the Reverend John Youngs. The new plantation was under the jurisdiction of the New Haven Colony in Connecticut. Mattimck, meaning "great creek", was settled 1661 by residents of the nearby town of Southold. In 1844 the Long Island Rail Road laid tracks that extended east to Greenport creating a link between New York City and eastern Long [dan& Since then, Mattituck has grown to become a major node on the North Fork. It is the only town center ~ that has exposure to the hea,/dy traveled Long Island Sound and offers town anchorage for 02 passing boaters. Furthermore, the New York State Department of Transportation has planned to extend the Long Island Expressway, which currently terminates in Riverhead, out east to end in Mattimck. The expressway is Long Island's major artery running from New York City via the Midtown tunnel to the eastern end of Long Island. Loot~ Island 'q°u~d ~ ~ C~tdtt~ct~ ' Be. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PROBLEM STATEMENT PROBLEM STATEMENT The hamlet of Mattimck, like many commumues on Long Island, has unregulated commercial development. This has resulted m "big-box" retail development and strip malls overta'kmg the small town. I.ovc Lane, an attractive small-town street, has deteriorated over the years and is in need of redevelopment. Furthermore, these facdities linut Mattituck from beiuga sigmficant harbor for boaters traveling the sound. Matthuck Creek is a port of call for several thousand transient boaters who moor and anchor their boats in the anchorage area adjacent to the park. It provides a safe harbor of refuge for those who travel from New York to Nantucket. The inlet and creek have regional significance as the only major harbor on the Long Island Sound to the east of Mt. Sinai/Port Jefferson harbors, a distance of about 40 miles. The regional importance has been identified in the Long Island Sound Costa/Management Program (DOS, 1999). The Inlet was identified as one of ten Marittme Centers on the Long Island Sound. MariUme Centers prowde the most suitable and appropriate locations for new ~r expansion of existing water-dependent commercial and industrial uses. Inadequate and unregulated town dockage facilities have created an illegal dumping and anchorage problem, adds to the decaYing context and damages the surrounding environment. Currently the existing marina and boatyard do not provide adequate facilities for pump-out or the necessary supplies for transient boaters. These areas are in desperate need of redevelopment and provide the crucial link between the downtown area and the waterfront. The Mattituck Chamber of Commerce has looked to promote the existing business on Love Lane in an effort to maintam the economic ~4ability of the "downtown" area. In addition, the Chamber has encouraged nexv business to locate in the hamlet core, thus creating nexv jobs and retaining existing ones in the community. With no empty stores, the marketability of the downtown area can be enhanced through the improvement of the community aesthetics. A facelift to the ex~stmg streetscape Will bring more residents and ~4sitors dollars into the town. The town seeks to bring back the vitality and improve on the existing sociological conditions that have declined over the years. A rex4talization and development of the downtown area and xvaterfront will attract commerce and tourism can, create jobs, and make Mattituck a substantial node on the North Fork. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PROJECT STATEMENT PROJECT STATEMENT The project will look into rehabilitation strategies for the Mattituck downtown area. The primary goal is to reestablish Mattimck as a major node on the North Fork. Emphasis will be placed on the desire for the development of public space and the implications of revitalization from an aesthetic, a programmatic, a functional, and a user's point of view. The primary focus will be on the development of the waterfront and town center and the positive impact they produce for the town. The tourist industries of small ports rely heavily on good waterfront facilities. In order to 04 accommodate these tourists seaports need to provide: ample parking near the waterfront, public transportation to it, walkways and open spaces that make waterfront activities visible, access to the piers and other sites of action, areas for restaurants, and other tourist attractions. The marina holds the potential to control the entire waterfront and establish the characteristic landing that sets the tone for the revitalization of the rest of the downtown. This landing becomes the connection between the realm of the town and water. Tying the town center and main retail area to the water, thus making one integrated environment, enhances area and creates a charming attractive place to go. The harbor management issues in the area are concentrated within Mattituck Inlet and Creek. Mattimck Creek has been a focus of the Town's attention since 1980, when a committee was appointed to evaluate concerns of the declining ecological health. Many of these issues remain today and will factor in to the development of a strategy for revitalizing the waterfront. Some of these issues are: Protection of water-dependent uses and the working waterfront (both recreational and commercial maritime activities) from intrusion by incompatible residential development as happened in the nearby hamlet of Greenport Encouraging adaptive reuse of underutilized, previously disturbed waterfront properties Improving navigation and dredging, including use of anchorage areas and navigation channels Expanding access to the water for recreation Mattituck offers an opportunity to see how different scopes of external space can be developed throughout the town center and waterfront areas. Along with formal programmatic elements there shall be the creation of informal episodes of space that; may serve as links between major functional areas, provide for multi-functional spatial usage, and create picturesque and stimulating environments around the area. The passing through the site by car, bike, foot, train, or by boat allows one to fully appreciate the series of linked spaces. It is important that the spaces created'as a sequence or with gradual movement between public and private domains. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRO, IECT STATEMENT These spaces may take on different scales to offer variety. This is particularly important due to the fact that Mattituck is relatively fiat and therefore does not allow for an amplified spatial experience through topography. The creation of the village center is important. This will function as a public and commercial hub, and become the central focus of interest, creating a complete sense of place. Additional Considerations: i. How to draw boaters from Long Island Sound into and down Mattituck Creek to the 2. How to pull tourists (boaters, vehicular traffic, etc... ) into downtown Love Lane area and call attention to the downtown area. 3. Uniting all forms of transportation present, vehicular, boaters, pedestrians, train passengers, and bikers. Taking the large scale and allowing it to exists in the smaller domain. 4. Response to issues pertaining to contextualism, environmental issues, sustainability, scale, public space, technology, construction details, site development from an architectural standpoint. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRO(~RAM 05 PROGRAM The project's prograsmnatic components begin to suggest elements that promote activity. The listing also provides an investigation in understanding the range of human activities that may be generated by certain relationships between spaces and places in the urban assemblage. The development of these programmatic elements also becomes an evaluation of each piece as part of the whole composition. Marina: Slips Provide combination of different do&age areas for vessels larger vessels up to 60 feet. A small floating platform should be provided for boaters who are on moorings or at anchor in the creek. The goal is to increase the number of current available slips to 100. Mooring Field/Anchorage Area This is a protected area designated for the placement of rental mooring buoys. These buoys are controlled by the town harbormaster based at the marina. The anchorage and mooring areas should allow for wide births to be given between neighboring anchored boats. Fuel Dock/Pump-out Station - 100sf The primary function of the marina is as a stop over point for traveling boaters. The fuel do& provides essentials such as fuel, ice, fresh water, pump out, and trash removal/recycling services to boaters. The dock should have adequate frontage for more than one vessel to be serviced at a time. Travel Lift/Mechanics Yard This is a haul out area for maintenance and w'mter storage. The lift should be able to handle a capacity of 50 tons and accessed from the water from boats. Marina Offices Serves as the control center for the marina. Will house the dock master's office, reservation desk, a map room, marina offices, and a possible Coast Guard Station. Bathhouse/Pool A big amenity for the boater at the marina is a freshwater baiting facility. Since many boats la& hot water service, a highly desired amenity of a marina is public showering fac'dities. The incorporation of a freshwater pool also provides a relaxing amenity separate from the life on the water. Restaurant/Bar A small ~ss formal restaurant for boaters and tourists to enjoy outdoor dining adjacent to the active waterfront. afine Supply A store is necessary for a boater who might need a particular engine or rigging part or any other marine related supplies. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PROGRAM Water sport Rentals A place to rent sea kayaks, canoes and other water related equipment for exploring the creek. The Wharf Landing: Public Green The public green with become a welcome center for visitors to the town. The green will function as the focal point for the Mattituck Fair, summer concerts, and other special events. Inn and Conference Center The inn is a mixture of about 20-35 units that are one and two bedroom suites. The units may also have a small kitchen space, full baths, living space, and an outdoor deck. These units can be rented by the general public, purchased as a time-share, or privately owned units. It w:dl also provide conference and banquet facilities. (note: since the project became primarily a master plan, as a result, Wharf Buildings l, 2, and 3 became the buildings that were programmed and designed.) Wharf Building 1 - two stories Restaurant Banquet Hall Patio Kitchen Service Retail shops Caf~ 5500 sf over two floors (3200 lower, 1300 upper level, 1000 outdoor) 2500 sf 1200 sf 1500 sf per floor 900 sf per floor 2 @ 1500 sf 950 sf Wharf Buildings 2 and Retail Lobby/Exhibition Offices Loft offices Service 3 - three stories 3 @ 1400 sf with 300 sf storage 1000 sf 3200-3800 sf 3000 sf 700 sf per floor Visitor's Center An information building for Mattituck tourists and an exhibition space for local arts and displays. The building will also house the wharf offices, public restrooms, and an information desk. Mattituck Creek Park: The new park will include these elements plus a fishing area, a rental f~'ility bikes and canoes and sea kayaks, and function as a scenic overlook for the creek and mariffa for passing travelers. The park could also have a seasonal ice rink and other recreation areas, providing a year round function of the area. Rental Facility A place that bikes and other land related recreational equipment could be rented and used by tourist and residents of the area. The building could also control the seasonal ice/roller rink. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PROGRAM Mattituck Station: Potentially represents one of the major transportation nodes for the area and provides a vehicle for the development of place within the town. Functions as the starting point for bikers using the bike routes. Site located between the waterfront and the town center of Love Lane. Love Lane Retail District Extension: An emphasis will be placed on maintaining the original tree organization while redeveloping the w storefronts and sidewalks and continuing it north on Love Lane to the intersection of county 05 road 48. The facelift and new construction will focus on creating an identity and giving character to the merchants' shops and establish a consistent language for the downtown area. General Conditions: Provisions for parking, bike racks a clock tower, directional kiosks and signage. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization ARCHITECTURAL INTENTIONS ARCHITECTURAL INTENTIONS Themes and areas of exploration of the project: To promote commerce and touffsm b_y emvuraging residents and tourists to shop the to~vn center Love Lane ~ Toprovideelementstopromoteanactiveut~anenvironment To investigate the notion and relationships of place, sequence, linkage, threshold, beginnit® simultaneiO,, and termination The Stage Set The juxtaposirion of water, boats, and architecture can be the basis for an opportunity for a metaphorical "stage set developed for the enjoyment of both actors and audience alike." It may be simple to conceptualize a marina With housing that also has the facilities convenient to the boater. But in this case there are opportunities for developing beyond the stage set and to create unique and memorable episodes and places that one desires to return to. Theme Establishing a successful theme xx411 control furore development and analysis of land use, materials, scale, and meaning. Ths conceptual standpoint also fuels responses to issues pertaining to contextualism, emCtronmental issues, public space, and site development form an architectural point of view. It is key to establish an image that the project as a whole xvill create. This image gives the user a perception of the project before coming to the area. The project will look to capture a spirit of time and place, or, what creates the ambiance that attracts people to the quaint waterfront town. Conceptualizing the theme will become part of the patti development. Programmatic Investigation The project also looks at the idea of a waterfront/ downtown revitalization from a programmatic viewpoint. It begs the question; is there a prototypical defimfion of a town or waterfront? What is it about quaint little waterfront towns that impress a certain romantic ambiance? Icons like a toxvn common or a lighthouse at the entry to a harbor begin to setup some sort of notion of place. Perhaps by refining these traditional elements and adding them to seeks to promote a new and more active urban environment. Wtth this in mind, the project becomes a programmatic investigation into an assemblage of parts to create the whole. Architecture and its Relation to Music Music is essentially a sequence of sounds organized in time. Composidonally it is layering transparencies of sound to create a collective piece. Mattituck can be analyzed as overlapping systems that all operate at the same time, sflnilar to the relationship of each instruments part in the musical score. Scoring in music is similar to marking on a site. Building on the site reflects ideas of musical dynamics, rhythm, and tone color. Breaking down the town area in this was can reveal how each layer begins to radiate its individual traits, just as if we were to examine a musical composition section by section. Now the characteristic qualifies of each layer can be analyzed and developed in order to convey a more cleaxly unified environment once they are joined together again. With this method a consciousness of the threshold between layers becomes much more important to maintain a clear notion of the entire composition. The goal is that once the layers are juxtaposed back onto each other they will give rise to a master plan able to fulfill the different experiences in the life of the town. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFI(~ATION SITE IDENTIFICATION Mattituck, Long Island, New York The xrfilage of Mattituck sits at 40'99" La6mde and 72'54" Longitude at 17 feet above sea level on Long Island's North Fork. The town is part of Suffolk County, wkich is one of the most populated counties in the state. Mattimck is 77 miles from New York CiD, and 19 miles from the northern dp of Long Island at Orient Point. The closest major city is Riverhead 8 miles to the west at the node where the north and south forks split. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION The Toxvn of Southold, which includes the hamlets of, Jamesport, Matutuck, Next- SuffoLk, Cutchogue, Peconic, Southold, Greenport, and Orient, is approXmxately 54 sqnare reties m s~ze with approXtmately 163 linear miles of coastline. It is long and narro~ in shape, w~th tt~c mainland extending 21 miles from the Rivethead town line east to Orient Point. Its greatest ~vidth is 5 mile, although generally western portions of the mainland are an average of 3 mtles, wkile to the seas of Hashamomuck Pond, the town is never wider than 1.5 milea. The Long Island Rail Road runs along Southold's spine, terminating ou the waterfront m 07 Greenport. This single mainline track runs to where it meets an elecmfied r~til line m Ronkonkoma and' then on to New York City. Two major arteries mn east west to east. NY Rout 25 extends throughout the southern and central portions of the Town and County Route 48 extends through the northern and central portions of the Town. The State Road is a two-lane highway, with designated turning lanes tn the Mattituck and Cutchogue business areas. For much of its length, 25 follows a historic route dating back to the 1700's that was known as the King's Highway. The road ran from Brooklyn to Orient. County Road 48 is a fora lane divided highway beginning just xvest of Love Lane and ending just west of Horton Lane m Southold. East and xvest of 48 the toxvn and state connectors are two lane highways. The county road was built in the 1960's presumably in anticipation o£ the extension of the Lon~ Island Expressway from its current terminus in Riverhead to the west. The road branches off Old Sound Avenue and bypasses the hamlet business centers tn a route that parallels the Long Island Ruilroad track to the south, wkich runs along the spine of the North Fork to its terminus in Greenpurt. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION M AT.,TITU Those who are heading from Long Island to Connecticut and New England xaza the Cross Sound Ferry also travel the North Fork. Rt. 48 goes through the town on its way to Orient Point. People also use the North Ferry from Greenport to get to Shelter Island and points on the South Fork. Mattituck also a convement safe harbor for boaters traveling the New York to Nantucket route. Area Road Map 'Na~ucket n3~te Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION Population Demographics Suffolk County: Populauon 1,350,747 persons Suffolk County's overall 1997 population density was 1,482 persons per square hale. Yet Suffolk's ten towns var5., greatly in population size and densit% The five western towns, Huntington, Babylon, Smithtown, Islip, and Brookhaven, contam 91% of the County's ~, population but just 62% of its land area. The 1997 population density in western Suffolk was 07 nearly 2,200 persons per square mile, xvhile in eastern Suffolk the density is iust 300 persons per square mile. Southold Town: Population 19,836 persons (Includes the hamlets of Cutchogue, East Marion, Gteenport, Laurel, Mattituck, Next' Suffolk, Orient, Peconic, Southold, and Fishers Island) Mattituck: Population Percent Urban 91.66 Percent White 96.11 Percent Black 2.09 Percent Am. Ind. Percent Asian 0.26 Percent Hispanic 6,888 persons (34.7% of total toxvn) 0.16 1.38 Percent in Poverty 4.44 Total Children 1,288 Economic Data Median Housing Value Median Household Income Per Capita (1989) $186,335 $38,986 $20,133 Total housing Units 3,904 (30% of total town) Economy The town's economy at various times had been described on three broad areas of entrepreneurial activity: agficulVare, maritime industries, and tourism/recreation. The first V. vo are thought of as being the traditional economic base, reflecting a heritage handed down over the past three and a half centuries. The latrer is considered to be_,a relatively recent phenomenon. The tourism/recreation sector of the economy is considered to include those activities attributed to summer residents, vacationers and day-trippers. Components of this industry include purveyors of recreational activities, food providers, and lodging and retail sen4ces. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION Mattituck Creek Park looking north towards marina Marina from across creek Love Lane retail district Love Lane looking SE Love Lane looking NW Rt. 48 (Middle Road) looking north to water Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization Figure Ground SITE IDENTIFICATION LONG Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION Climactic Data Temperatures (in degrees Fahrenheit) Annual averageS0 Monthly average 31 Januat3, 73 july Precipitation Average Rain 43" per year Snow 34" per year Winds Prevailing winds out of SW in summer and NW in the ,x;mter Fetch Distance Tides at Mattituck Inlet (Drpical inlet water depth: 6.2') Mean High 5.4 (5.8 spring) Sea Level 2.8 Mean Loxv 0 Jan 25 4:59 am 2.35 lfigh 11:19 am -.02 loxv 5:32 pm 4.68 high 11:39 pm .10 low Apr 25 2:10 am .39 low 8:28 am 5.20 high 2:38 pm .24 low 8:58 pm 5.32 high Aug 25 4:42 am .18 low 10:54 am 5.42 high 4:55 pm .40 low 11:09 pm 5.86 high Flooding The potential for flooding in the area are relatively low considering the shoreline. In the south part of the creek storm-driven water levels can result in extensive clouding of low-lfmg areas. The shoreline in the southern part of the creek is generally lower in elevation than the northern part. Pardy this is due m the increase of houses on the northern end of the creek creating a runoff to the south. A development of the southern part of the shoreline will raise its elevation and help prevent any significant flooding problems from damaging the town. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization SITE IDENTIFICATION Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization Flood Zones SITE IDENTIFICATION +% Zone AE: Base Flood Zone X: 500 year flood Zone X-white: 100 year flood w/average depth of less than 1' w/drainage less than 1 sq. mile Map# 36103C0481G FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization Traffic Patterns Main Road ~ Secondary Road mm Long Island Rail Road ~ Marine SITE IDENTIFICATION LONG .._~- Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization Land Use ] Retail Commercial Institutional Residential '! SITE IDENTIFICATION LONG Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization ..' LACK OF SITE IDENTIFICATION LoNG . · + C ii 'l I II Currendy the retail dismct and waterfront are separated in distance and by Rt. 48 that goes through the town. Additionally, the prominent axis of Love Lane has an established comer at the intersection of Main Road to the south, but lacks an axtal termination point on the other end. This area by the Mattimck Creek Park could potentially be developed to terminate this axis. l Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT The Town of Southold Zoning Code of 1997; provided these followmg regulator)' issues. There arc no historical restticnons for the town that apply to blammck and no specml environmental snpuladons that affect the proiect. Marine (M-I and M-II) District Zoning Regulations The Town currently has two zonmg classifications, M-I and M-II, that define the water dependent and water-enhanced uses that are permitted on the waterfront. The pm'nar)' difference between the M-1 and M-il districts is one of degree. The M-I zones are found in more protected and environmentally sensitive areas and the zone itself allows a restricted nmnber of uses. The M-II zones, by cofitrast, can be found in the more open waters arid near creek mouths. The zone permits a greater number and intensity of uses than that permitted in M-I. M-I's purpose is "to provide a waterfront location for a hmited (emphasts supphed) range of water-dependent and water-related uses, wkich are those uses which require or benefit from direct access to or location in marine or tidal ~vaters but which are located within the town '5 tidal creeks or natural coves~ (emphasis supphed). (Chapter 100-110 Zoning Ordmance, Fown Of Southold Zoning Code) The uses permitted as of fight in this district include: Marinas for recreational or commercial boats including sale of fuel. Docks, shps, piers, whatwes for pleasure or fishing mps or vessels. Boatyards for building, stormg, repairing, renting, sellmg or servicmg boats, which may mdude the following accessory uses: sales of marme eqmpment or products, dockside facilities for fuel, and where pump-out fadlities are available, restroom and laundry facilities for overnight patrons. Boat and marine engme repair, sales and display, yacht brokers and mar%e msurance brokers. Retail sale or rental of fishing, riving or bathing supplies and equipment if accessory, to a marina, boatyard or ships' loft or chandlery.. Uses permitted by Special Exception of the Zonmg Board include: Beach, yacht and boat clubs including accessory uses such as swimming pools, tennis courts and racquetball facilities. Mariculture or aquaculture operations or research and development. In contrast to M-I, the purpose of M-II is "to provide a waterfront location for a wide range of water-dependent and water-related uses, which are those uses which require or benefit from direct access to or location in marine or tidal waters and which, in general, are located on major waterways, open baS, fronts or the Long Island Sound.,, (emphasis supplied) (Chapter 100-120 Zonmg Ordinance, Town of Southold zonmg Code) The uses pemUtted in this district as of right include a" of the uses permitted in M-I whether by fight or by special exception. In M-Il, the uses requirmg Special Exception include the following: Restaurants, excluding outdoor counter service, dfive-ins or curb-service establishments. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Ferry terminals. Transient hotels or motels subject to two conditions: mimmum lot area for the use must not be less than three acres and the number of guest rooms shall be limited by the availability of pubhc water and sewer and shall require four thousand square feet of land per guest unit. Fish processing plants. Fish markets (for fm or shellfish), whether wholesale, retail or a combination thereof. The more intensive uses permitted on M-II properties reflect the perception that open or xvell- flushed waters are netter able to deal with the detrimental em4ronmental impacts that t3~pically accompany these uses. Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District [ 100-40 Purpose The purpose of the Hamlet D~nsity (}ID) Residential District is to permit a mix of housing types and level of residential density appropriate to the areas in and around the major hamlet centers, particularly Mattituck, Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the XFfllage of Greenport. ~ 100-41 Applicability The Hamlet Density (FID) Residential District may be designated on the Zoning Map by the Town Board upon its own action or by petition on parcels within one-half (1/2) mile of a Hamlet Business (liB) District of Mattituck, Cutchogue and Southold Hamlet and within one- fourth (1/4) mile of the Hamlet Business (FIB) District of Orient and within one-half (1/2) mile of he boundary of the Village of Greenport. ~ 100-213 Transition buffer area The purpose of the transition buffer area is to provide privacy from noise, headlight glare and visual intrusion to residential dwellings. A buffer area shall be required along all bound*ties of a nonresidential lot abutting any lot in a residential district. Such buffer area shall comply with at least the following minimum standards: A. The buffer area shall be located within the boundaries of the subject property. B. The minkmum width of buffer areas shall be as follows: (1) Hamlet Business District: fifteen (15) feet. (2) Marine I and II Districts: twenty (20) feet, 0) Limited Business District: twenty (20) feet (4) General Business District: twenty-five (25) feet Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT (5) Industrial districts: thtrt3~ (30) feet Any district other than a residential district adjoirm~g land owned or maintained by New York State, Suffolk Count3' or Southold Town w~th current ~,r potential use as parkland: txventy-five (25) feet The buffer area shall be of evergreen phnlmg of such t3'pe, height, spacing and arrangement as, in the judgment of the Planning Board, will effectively screen thc activity on the lot from the neighboring residential area. As a mminmm, the planting shall consist of a double row of trees six (6) feet in height. Other Zoning Stipulations The southern portion of this sub-area, a narrow band of land betxveen the head of the Creek and count3' road 48 are part of the Matfimck hamlet business district. These properues arc zoned General Business 03). There is a substantial amount of land, located along the inlet that ~s zoned Marine 1'1 (M-II), wkich allows both water-dependent and water-enhanced uses. Of the approximately 16 acres of M-II zoned land, about 12.5 acres of it is vacant or under-developed. The underutilized hnd is located close to the mouth of the inlet, on the west side of the creek. 'lqne smtability of this land for development is compromised by the lack of pubhc water, the Limited road access through a considerable amount of residential development, and the fact that much of the property was a former marsh that was covered ~rith fill. In addition, the removal of the asphalt plant poses a substantial set of financial and environmental obstacles to economically feasible redevelopment efforts. Although the existing water-dependent uses along the Mattituck waterfront are consistent with the iX{II zoning category, the district does allow the potential for non-water dependent uses. These uses are considered "water-enhanced" in that they provide different forms of pubhc access to the waterfront (e.g., restaurants, and hotels). However, here, the toss of commercial docking and support facilities would be devastating to commercial fishing operations, since the facilities in Mattituck are the only ones available along this stretch of the Long Island Sound Creek Regulations Mattituck Inlet and Creek are accessed by a channel that is dredged and maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. According to NOAA charts, channel depths within the creek at mean low water, range between 7.5 feet at the mouth and 4.5 feet near the narrow neck opposite Old Mill Road. There is a 5.5 feet depth near the head. The channel entrance was last dredged in 1990 to a depth of approximately 9 feet. (Authorized depth is 7 feet, but 2 feet over draft is often taken.) Two long, extended rock jetties protect the channel entrance and the mouth of the Inlet. The jetty locations are marked, both on and offshore, with U.S. Coast Guard navigational aids. During the busier summer months, shoal growth can affect navigation of the narrower reaches of the channel in the first two turns inland from the jetties, particularly during periods of tidal Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT change. This waterway is only dredged to approximately seven feet deep (at low tide), thereby limiting passage of commercial vessels larger than 60 feet in length. Only a small amount of shoaling is requi~ed to affect namgation. Parking ~ 100-190 Purpose Regulations for off-street parking and truck loading areas are imposed in order to minimize traffic congestion, ah: pollution and the risk of motor vehicle and pedestrian accidents and to address aesthetic considerations. ~ 100-191 Off-street parking areas Off-street parking spaces, open or enclosed, are perrmtted accessory to any use specified beloxv. Any land which is developed as a unit under single ownership and control shall be considered a single lot for the purpose of these parking regulations. Reasonable and appropriate off-street parking requirements for structures and uses which do not fall within the categories listed below shall be determined by the Planning lard upon consideration of all factors entering into the parking needs of each use. Type of Use Required Number of Spaces Boatyard, including boat Sales and rentals addition Sales and rental portion, 3 spaces, in to marina requirements Conference facility. 1 space per 4 seats in the largest assembly hall or meeting area, plus 1 space for each4 seats in classroom facilities Drinking establishment 1 space per 3 seats or 1 space per 100sf of floor space Hotel or motel, resort 1 space for each guest room and 1 for each employee, plus accessory use parking is required Marina I space per boat slip, mooring, dock space, and employee Recreational facility 1 space for each 300sf of floor area, except sport courts Restaurant 1 space per 2 seats or 1 space per 50sfofgross floor space, whichever is greater Retail 1 space per 200sfofsales area Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Areas computed as parking spaces. Areas whtch may be computed as opeli or ench)sed (~t~ street parlm~g spaces include an}' private garage, carport or other area available fi3r parlmrg, other than a street or a driveway. Size of spaces. Three hundred fifty (350) square feet shall be considered one Ill) space It~, provide room for standing area and aisles for maneuve£mg). Aisles bet~veen rows ,0f parking spaces shall be not less than twent)'-two (22) feet wide, unless reduced for sLxty degree-angle '~' parking, in which case the aisle space should not be not less than sixteen (16) feet ~x4de. 08 Access. Unobstructed access to and from a street shall be provided. Such access shall consist of at least one (1) fifteen-foot lane for parking areas xx4th more than four (4) spaces but less than txventy (20) spaces, and at least two (2) ten-foot lanes for parking axeas wtth twenty (20) spaces or more. No entrance (ir eat for any off-street parking area shall be located xvithin rift), (50) feet of any street intersection nor exceed a grade of six percent (6%) within twenty-five (25) feet of any street or line nor ten percent (10%) at any other point. Joint facilities. Required parking spaces, open or enclosed, may be provided in spaces desXgned to serve jointly two (2) or more establishments, whether or not located on the same lot, provided that the number of required spaces in such joint facilities shall be not less than thc total required for all such establishments. When any lot contains two (2) or more uses having different parking requirements, the parking requirements for each use shall apply to the extent of that use. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Port Geographe Bussrlton, \ustralia Cox Architects 1987 1800 hectares The pro}ect strategy revolved the creation of a new town ship with the funds extracted from the conserving sigmficant wetlands adjacent to the site. Around the manna are proposed a town center, txvo low-scale resort hotels, and wsitor facilities. Reshaping the lagoon also allowed it to act as a major flushing oudet for the area. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Pier 39 San Francisco, California Warren Simmons, Developer 1978 200,000 square feet of area Built on an abandoned pier of existing wood from wares reused m new buildings to create and urban environment. Theme: developing warf structures that would create a total environment for recreational facilities reiterative of the scale and texture of the old warf. With the various demands that have been put on the waterfront in recent years, and because the entire useable waterfront has been put to use as harbor facilities, the solution was to develop the older facilities. Other than the replacement of the tire breakwater, the overall development has held up well and continues to offer more activities and services each year. The c e te a distinct image and has encouraged muldple uses on a daily as well as Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Renton, Washington 1982 A pnmaqr goal was to create an active space for informal use and provide a space for civic events. The structures were composed as a series of spaces linked by open spaces. The turn-of-the-century waterfront vernacular attempts to weave the site structures together. There are also provisions for minor commercial establishments integrated around the site. The ~Forks Renewal Assiifiboine River Walk Mamtoba, Canada and Cohlmeyer Hanson Assoc. 1987 A mixed-use project that grew in the voids between a collection of historic structures, the Forks Market comprises a lively mixture of shops and restaurants on two levels and features a five-story glass tower offering panoramic views of the city. Dominating the plaza is a tensile structure that houses a skating rink. The waterfront also offers river walks, a marina, and additional recreation areas. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Port Grimaud Grimaud, France Bicentennial Commons Cincinnati, Ohio Francois Spoerry 1966 189 acres w/ 1,871 residential units Richard Greiwe, Ex. Director 1998 4 mile long waterfront The imfial idea was for a city that could "live" at the waters edge. The setting was to draw from waterfront villages like Venice, or Port Merion in Whales. The success is based on a xvorkable scale, theme, and image that promotes a romantic waterfront lifestyle. Bicentenmal Cotmnons was created from land acquired from an old riverfront scrap yard. It provides is a conununitT and family recreation space and emphases a wide range of activities. Amphitheaters, tree-lined walks, a boathouse, restaurants, and sports areas are combined with picturesque views to loin the three integrated but separate projects. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization PRECEDENT ANALYSIS Castro Street Mountain Viexv, California 1990 Castro Street exemplifies a design of a street of subtle changes ia level and flexibility xvithin a strong, clear design concept. It defines a street on three levels; sidewalks, parking, and auto passage. The parking apron with trees planted along its outer edge toward the street provides a flexible transition zone that is dominant and controlled: by the pedestrian. Well-designed and located passages ways to rear parking areas help focus the activity onto the street.I Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN PROCESS At the beginning of the Independent Project semester, I found myself looking back on what made me decide to take on this project. Having worked in the town of Matfimck over the previous summer I became fairly familiar xvith the area. I had always had an interest in small harbors and quaint seaports as a kid groxvmg up. Having had the opportunity to sail around the New England and Long Island regions a few tm~es over my life, and fairly frequendy over the previous summer, I had the opportunity to spend some time in these environments and see them from a users point of view. Midway through the summer I became aware of the cur_rent downtown revitalization project that Mattimck was currently beginning to apply for grant money for. The form I was working at, Archirecnologies, was involved in the project on a pro bono basis to work with the town for devising a revir*liTation plan for the current well-known town center area along Love Lane. The area to be planned was from the railroad tracks south to route 25. Being that the Mattimck creek waterfront xvas currently subject to an coastal management survey for its deca3;mg condition, I saw the project as an opportunity to extend the downtown revitalization efforts and develop the waterfront as an active town center xvharf similar to that of the neighboring to~m of Greenport. Thus the project came to life. One of the first tasks for developing the patti was to take words or pbxases out of our proposals from the previous semester and investigate their meanings to better define what our intentions were. Some of the selections that I made were: Investigations in art and science: } Creation of both beauty and utility in a way that organized and synthesized to create an architectural environment Looking for parallels in order to provide variety and a conceptual or theoretical basis for development Sequence/Transition: ~ Elements relate to each other in a structured order to invoke emotion, movement, or transition A procession through the environment that presents a unified perception through structured episodes Completeness of Organization: > Conveys a sense that the architecture has been conceptually developed from the start to finish, the macro to the micro scale To say that dements, though independently developed as solutions, came together to become one element Rehabilitation/Revitalization: Positively impressing on what might be a situation that does not meet the potential of its context Development of public space: Space that is "public" and inviting The type of environment that becomes activated by usage and occupation Space(s) that feed off each other and call for public use Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS As an analysis exercise, I began to diagranunaticallYwork lOOkm theat xvhat strategies might begin to together development of the project. The first scheme was fueled by the development of a wharf along the waterfront and a building that paralleled it. The building served as an edge where a terraced public space in betxveen could be developed. The marina was always conceptualized early on as its own endty in the proiect but physically connected to the wharf by a pedestrian bridge. Its location was always planned for the peninsula on the east side of the creek. This scheme also took the road and created a divided, slower traffic passage through the site xvith stoplights at each intersection on the sites borders. Intersections along Love Lane were seen as potential nodes that lead to a terminus of some sort at the waterfront. The second scheme investigated the potential for modifying the current coastline and integrating the water through the site. It had the potential for a more sculpted development of the site and a free layout of the buildings. The road was to be re directed to the south to join up with route 25. Thts scheme also looked saw the creation of a terminus of the Love Lane axis at the waterfront. But due to the ecological effects of excavating all that land to the water level, the scheme was seen as too unrealistic and a sculpted site would not blend well with the existing context of the town. The third scheme called for the development of a wharf that would mn along the waterfront. This wharf could be conceptualized as the new town center and activated by public use. At ti'us stage an idea for the buildings was not planned, but the wharf area would be developed as a plaza adjacent to buildings. Here the axis became more framed by the continuation of retail up Love Lane from its current location. This not only framed the axis more, but it suggested that there should be something that lead the eye down the axis/( and could frame the view further. The road was planned as movLng south between P~oute 48 and Pike Street, moving the intersect/on further from the waterfront. Mattituck Waterfront Revita DESIGN PROCESS Patti 1: The first patti development took parts from all the analysis exercises and incorporated them together using the theme of the first exercise, the wharf and building. Here the water's edge and wharf are defined by the building and the building is an opaque object protecting the wharf. This posed the opportunity to develop the characteristic of the edge, which took on a ridged quality and paralleled the building. Pedestrian movement was fairly choppy, to say that it moved from node to node, though each place and environment. In this patti, the main wharf building attempted to frame an edge while also gmcling and defining the circulation in a much more unyielding manner. This concept looked to frame the axis continuing the retail development north up Love Lane and developing nodes at each intersection. This concept also questioned the need to terminate a view versus framing it. The road maintained two options; maintaining its current location or sweeping to the south adjacent to the tram tracks. Merging the road to with Route 25 was abandoned due its crossing the railroad tracks. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS Patti 2: The second parti was organized around the ideas of view, connection, transparency, and movement. It called for the organization of a complex of buildings that could be circulated around and between. This perhaps could further activate the watexfronL Being able to see the water from passing streets also created the potential for both visual and physical connections with the town. Circulation was fairly loose, though still defined by the buildings, and could be framed along with the views. This plan took on a more dynamic arrangement of the buildings while maintaining the notions of the surrounding context of the town. There was more freedom of development both in the planning and architecture. Now the question arose as to the need for a terminus of axis, but rather there could be a framing and continuation of the axis outward, a potentially exciting and changing focal point in itself. The partis were well received as relevant approaches to the problem, but one statement that began to influence the development of the project was that there needed to be more of a Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS campus-like perception of the site. I had been developing the elements of the plan separately and figuratix, ely connecting them through circulation, but they lacked a connection from a planning point of view. Also as the project evolved further I was asked to create a better relation of the water and the land, two realms that in :effect my project began to ioin. Furthermore, it seemed to be that breaking the buildings doxvn into smaller elements would be better. It was a less obtrusive strategy and related in figure ground to the area. The site planning moves were too ridged and needed to be a little smoother. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS .. .' ~. ConceptualSketch: Route 48 ~~~ The Wharf Conceptual Sketch: Mattituck Creek Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS Schematic 1 Schematic 2 Schematic 3 Schematic 4 Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS Follox~mg the parti presentation a varieD' of schematic planning strategies were med. The criticisms were well received and helped me to generate schematic planmng designs for the project, the four schematic designs provided the desired naturalistic circulation but differed in how the architecture responded to the edge. I questioned did it need to reinforce it, or, define more of a public space to be contained by it. The real question became which one became more successful in satisfying the concepts of landing, nodes and circulation. My problems were that I had a big site from a circulation point of view stretching a small-scale program. I began to see the circulation path as a city street where the path defined the buildings and the connections were created through the spaces, or alleys, between them. Scheme 1 was centered around a plaza that was bordered on three sided by buildings. Scheme 2 created a sort or viexving point while allowing the circulation path to be bordered on both sides by water. Scheme 3 took on a more direct framing of an axis going from Lane and one from the marina, joining them in a plaza. Here also the plaza and water's edge xvere separate. Scheme 4 took on a more naturalistic formation from that grew from the shape of the coastline. This scheme had the potential to combine strong points from the other three schemes and incorporate them with it. It was at this stage that the road (Route 48) became the topic of discussion. The big debate was whether or not to move it. At this point it was something that I always had in the back of my mind, but for me personally it did not play a substantial role in the development of what I considered the site north of road. My fear was that it would become the focus and only topic of conversation for the project. My theotT is that no matter where I moved it bee, veen its existing location and the railroad tracks you would eventually have to cross it. As the semester progressed, it produced a smile on both my adx4sor face and mine when it xvas raised in reviews. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization DESIGN PROCESS Schematic 5 The final schematic des:gn had a much more orthogonal layout. [t was a product of my not being satisfied xvith how I was trying to make the building edges parallel to the natural waters edge. Here a buffer space acted as a threshold between the naturalistic coast and the objective architecte~e. This buffer developed into the new town center/public green that was currently being planned for the Love Lane retail area, which really had no space available. It moved the town center to the xvaterfront, defined and framed the axis, maintained a naturalistic circulation, and treated the site as a campus that the buildings united along the path. The final destgn developed from this scheme. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION FINAL PRESENTATION The t-mai presentation was held m the thesis review rooms on May 5, 201)£i at 3:3Upm. -lhe faculty members present were: Hasan-Uddm Khan, Michele Foster, David O~rbin, Doug Gauthier, Bill McQueen, and guests. I felt vet3' confident at the level of completion that the project had reached and was happy with. its developments. If there was one area that thc project lacked development it was in the architecture of the buildings I designed. Having spent most of the semester concentrating on a site plamdng strategy and detailing its components, 1 did not begin to design the buildings until the final quarter. Originally I had intended to design all of the buildings on the site, but later found that this would not be possible. I did manage to get to an area and a decent level of detail within it. It is hard to remember the &rect feedback about the project that xvas received during the review since I had no sleep the previous two nights, and I was ahtde nervous and shocked that I was done. Overall the review went well. The major criticisms were on the architecture of the buildings theknselves and how I had decided to enclose them xxfth the combination of the wood and metal. I recewed nuxcd reactions about the shapes of the buildings and their relation to one another. The overall sttc plan was well approved as a successful strateD' for soMng the problems that flus pro}ect entailed. The topic of the road did come up, but the solution that I had developed was accepted and it was not discussed as much as I thought ~t would be. The major toptc of conversation was on ho~v I had cultivated the typical "Cape Cod" architectuxe and given tt a new identity tectonically. The masses were still the same but became activated by their finishes. The combination of a clear sense of reality that I had maintained was overall appreciated and I was commended on how this project could actually be done. Personally that was the most rewarding comment to me. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION Creek · Creek Park Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization cree~ ~attitucl< VC~terfront l~ev~t6hzation FINAL PRESENTATION I. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization .J FINAL PRE~S~NTATION 11 Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization FINAL PRESENTATION Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ache, Donald \V. Marinas: A Working Gu/de to thetr Development and Destgrz Architectural Press: London. 1984. Blain, W.R. Marina Developments. Computational Mechanics Publications: Billenca, Ma. 1993. Breen, Ann and Rigby, Dick. The New Waterfront. McGraw-Hill: New York. 1996. Breen, Ann and Rigby, Dick. \Vaterfronts: Cities ReclaLm Their Edge. McGraxv-Hill: New York. 1994. Eckbo, Garrett. "My Philosophy", "\~(nnat's Next: Where Do We Go From Here", Philosophy of Landscape. p.20-24;26-32. Hayman, I and Trachtenberg, M. Architecture. Prentice-Halt: Nexv Jersey. 1986. p. 4l. Hertzberger, Herman. "Im4tmg Form" Lessons for Students of Arckitecture. p. 174. Jacobs, Allan B. Great Streets. MIT Press: Cambridge. 1993. Marina, Elizabeth. Architecture as a Translation of Music. Princeton Architectural Press: New Jersey. 1994. Process: Architecture. "Waterfronts". Process Architecture Publishing: Tokyo. 1984. Rainey, Ruben M. "Organic Form in The Human Landscape". p. 180-205. Scopaz, Valerie. "Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. December, 1999. StraCmski, Igor. The Poetics of Music. p.47-90. The Master Architect Series. Cox Architects. The Images Publishing Group: Australia. C.1994. p. 112-115. Torte, L. Azeo. Waterfront Devdopment. Van Nostrand Re'mhold: New York. 1989. Town of Southold Buildmg Code. Southold, NewYork. 1998. Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization Selected intemet sites: wwxv.su ffolk.lib.ny.us/libraries/matt ~xx~v.co.s u ffolk.ny.us www.newsday.com www.norhtfork.net www. fordyce.org/long_island/ BIBLIOGRAPHY Mattituck Waterfront Revitalization