Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-07/14/1966 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert 'vV. Gillispi¢, Jr., Chairman Robert Bergen Charles Gregonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. $outhold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. Telephone SO 5-2660 M~-I N ~ T ES S~UTHOAB T~NN:BOARD OF APPEALS ~uly 14, 1966 A regularmeeting of the Southold ToWn Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M2~ Thursday, July 14, 1966, at th eTown Office~ Main Road,:~Southold~ New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert-W.L. Gillispi~ Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen, Serge Doyen~ Jr.~. Fred Hulse~ Jr. Absent: Mr..-~arles Grigonis, Jr. P~%r~BLIC HEARING: Appeal N~. 880 - 7:30 Upon application of Edward L. Nidds,. Main Rea~, Southold, New York,. for'a special exception in accordance with the ZoningOrdinance,_Article IV, Section 408, Subsection B, for permission to retain a wall sign. Locatien of property: north side Main Road,?South®l~, New York, boundednorth by Railroad, east by'ArthurHaan,, south by Main Road, west by E.B. Britzo Fee paid $5.0~. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a speical exception, legal notice ofhearing, affidx%vit attesting toits publication~in theofficial newspaper, and n otice tothe applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- July~14, 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? MR. NIDDS: I am here. THE CHAIRMAN: In this application you are referring to the sign on the small building on the easterly portion of this property, is that correct? MR. NIDDS: That is correct. THE CHAIRMAN: There are two signs on that building. One on the east side and one on the south side. You also have countless other-signs there. MR~ HULSE: One sign is next to the road. MR. NIDDS: That one has to be moved back. THE CHAIRMAN: You have four signs on the buildings in the back. MR.' NIDDS: The people can't see them until they get in there. THE CHAIRMAN: You might as well take them down. Which signs do you want to keep~ ~R. NIDDS: I understand that the lettering was too big for the size of the building. MR. HULSE: That and the fact that you have too many signs. HOWARD TERRY~Building Inspector: He opeaates a business in every one of those buildings. THE CHAIRMAN: The standing sign has to be moved back. You have another sign in between the two buildings. Do you think all these signs help you? MR. NIDDS: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response.) Sout~old Town Board of Appeals -3- July 14.~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this appliCation ? :(There was no response.) After investisation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission 'to retain two wall signs on one of the business buildings on his property. The Board finds that the applicant has an antique business and his signs are to identify him as an antique dealer. The Board grants permission to the applicant to keep a sign on the south side of the easterly out building on the property, on the condition that the applicant remove the sign on the east side of t~same building. The standing Sign on the front of the residence must be moved at least five feet back from the property line. The additional standing sign in front of the westerly residence must be removed entirely. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfa~a and jsutice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of nieghborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be psrmanently-or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will b~ observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie~. seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that-Edward L. Nidds, Main Road~ Southold, New York~ be granted permission to retain a wall sign in accordance with the provisions set forth above, on property located on the north side Main Road, Southold, New York, subject to the following conditions: 1. The ground sign shall be located at'least five feet from any property line. 2. The signs to be removed must be removed by September 1, 1966. The signs to be relocated must be relocated by September 1, 1966. 3. The signs shall be subject to any subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinanceas it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:~Far. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen~ Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. Southold TownBoard of Appeals -4- July 14, 1966 PUBLIC gEARING: Appeal No. 874 - 7:40 Upon application of'Claudio~s Restaurant, ill Main Street, ~reenport, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,~ Section 300~-Subsection 10~ ~ndArticle IV, Section 408, Subsection A, for permission to retain off premises directinnal signs at the following locations: 1) on the property of S. Ciacia Estate., located on the north side Main Road, Greenport, New York~ bounded north by LILCO, east by C~aapel Lane, south by Main Road, west by LT?~O, and2) on the property of R. Grattan Estate~ located on the south side County Route 27, east by"Lipco Road, south by Sound Avenue, west by L. Milowski. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application' for a special exceptinn~ legal notice of hearing~ affidavit attesting to t~C~ its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is the~ anyone present-who wishes to speak for'this application? !(~There was no response. ) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ~There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission to retain directional signs on the property of S. Ciacia Estate and R. Grattan Estate. The applicant has a letter from R. Grattan Estate granted permission for a sign on the property, however there is no letter of permission for the sign on the S. Ciacia Estate property. The Board points out that the size of the signs requested by the applicant are well beyond the maximum size sign permitted by the Zoning Ordinance for any section of the Town. However, the applicant may erect signs~, purely of directinnal nature,, to be no larger than four feet by six feet (4'x6'). The policy of 'the Board of Appeals has been to provide directional signs oflimited siz~ for enterprises that are believed to be in the interest of the traveling public. Included in this group of enterprises ~re restaurants and marinas, which are operations conducted by the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- July 14, 19666 The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanen~yor substantially injured andthe spirit of the Ordinance Will be observed. On motion by bit. Gillispie~ seconded by M_r. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that Claudio's Restaurant~ 111 Main Street~ Greenport, New York,. be granted permission to retain off pre- mises directinnal signs on the p~operty orS, Ciacia Estate, on the north side Main Road~. Greenport; and on the R. Grattan Estate, on the south side County Route~27~ Mattituck, New York~ subject to the followingconditions: t. These signs shall be granted for one ~1) year only,. menewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. These signs shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordi~nce as it applies to signs. 3. Both signs must be reduced in size,to be four feet by six feet (4'x6'), no larger. 4. Both signs must be erected at least five feet from any property line. 5. Both signs must ~e erected at least three feet above ground level. 6. Both signs must be purely of directional nature, as distinguished from advertising signs. 7. Both signs must comply with the above conditions before September 1~ 1966. 8. A letter of permission for the erection of a sign must be obtained from the S. Ciacia Estate. Vote of the Board: Ayes:~ Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen~ Mr, Doyen~ Mr~ Hulse. $outhold Town Board or'Appeals --6-- July 14, 1966 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 882 - 8:00 P.M~(E.~D~'S~T%)~ Upgn application of Hideaway Estates, Youngs Point, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain off premises name Plate identification signs on property that is located on the north side of a private right of way known as Miller Road offthe east side of Mill Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by-Stevens, east by private rigth oflway, south by A.W. Smith, west by Mill Road. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading.the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official nespaper~and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch. There are 16 names on the sign. At this time is there ansone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. WERTENBERG: I have siad my storyin the application. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who~ wishes to speak in favor of this application? ~There was no response. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who~wishes to speak against this application? MRS. A.Wo~ SMITH: I do. THECtAIRMAN: Do you have a letter here from ~ William Wickham' s Office ? MR$~ A.W.~ SMITH: Yes. The Chairman read the following letter: "July 12, 1966~ Board of Appeals, ~own of Southold~. Southold~ New York. Re: Application of HideawayEstates, 8 p.m., July 14, 1966 "Gentlemen: "I have been asked byers. W.H.' Smith to represent her in this matter. Unfortunately, I have a conflict for this time, so I am taking the liberty ofregiste~ing opposition by letter. Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- Ju~y 1~ 1966 "Mrs. Smith is the owner of this parcel, including the right of way in question. This was conveyed to her predecessors in title bydeed from Jennie Young and Others to Daniel Dana Jackson and William Francis Kip by deed dated February 9, 1918 and recorded in Suffolk~County Clerk;s Office in Liber 963 of deed~ page 227. The deed contais the following reservation: "SUBJECT,'NEVERTHELEES to a right of way for th-e said Clara B. Miller and for the several heirs at law and devisses of said Selah Young, deceasedt above named~ twenty-four (24) feet in width~ extending east and west~across the premises hereby conveyed from the land ofClara B. Miller,. on the ~east to the highway~ on the west crossing M ape's Neck~ known in recent years as Cox~s Neck, the northern boundary of said right of way being six ~(6) feet south of the line dividing the premises of said Clara B. Miller and the Premises hereby conveyed. "A Xerox copy'of the above deed is enclosed. "A right of way for access does not c~rry the right to erect~sighs without the permiSsion of the fee owner. Therefore~ we ask that the petition be denied and signs removed. "Very cordially yours~ /s/ WilliamWickham." T~E CHAIRMAN: Does this summarize whatyou wanted to say~ ~irs. Smith 9 MRS. SMITH: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: We have an awkard situation here. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak againstthis application? MR. SMITH: The property belongs to my wife. I think the sign is unattractive. There is also a couple of other signs there. THE CHAIRMAN: This application only covers one sign° MR.. SMITH: There is a for sale sign that obscures vision coming out of there. THE CHAIRMAN: The for sale sign would obscure vision coming out. However, the sign under application is at least five feet above ground level and you can look under it. Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- July 14~ 1966 MR. WERTENBERG: You have got an awkward situation here. HideawayEstates has a right to leave the sign there. It doesn't block vision of traffic coming east and west. It dOesn't block any vision. As far as the for sale sign, we are glad to take the for sale sign down Thes~her sign I have northing to do with. I would li~e to ~ this~ that as many names have been there long before 1938 when built in Hideaway Estates. This sign goes back 50 years. Long before your legal letter you got from William Wickham. This goes beyond~e Town Board. The only interest you have in this is to say whether or not we are entitled to have the sign there. As for the legal aspect, this is for the civil courts. This ~ sign is on the~-;~wx~ burrer'strip, six feet, ~iven in 1848, 100 years ago. Mrs.~ Smith claims she owns the right of way. She owns nothing. What about the title companies that granted mortgages~ and gaurantee the real estate, extending a half of million dollars in some cases. They wouldn't do this without a clear title to the property. It's a private matter more t~an anything else. Mr. Smith couldn't see the sign if he Stood on the roof ofhis house. I don't think it is in the Board's . - -- jurisdiction who owns the right of way. THE CHAIRMAN: That is the way we feel about it. It has been our experience to grant the right to putup identification signs in this type of situation. There are many people who live behind a gateway and need identification. This is often necessary for emergency equipment. We are not interested in who owns the right of way. MRj WERTENBERG: If Mrs. Smith thinks she owns the property. That is no so. A verylenghty discussion was held on the 24 foot right of way and the six foo~ buffer strip, in regard to theownership of it. The Board again viewed and read parts of the deed submitted by Mr. William~Wickham,. Esq. Mrs. Smith stated she had no objection to a sign stating only the name of the road. 'Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- July 14, 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak against'this application? (There was no response.) After investigatimn and inspection ~he Board finds that the applicant has requested permission to place an area identification sign on the north side of a private right or'way known as Millet'Road off the east side of Mill Road, Mattituck. There is some controversy over who has title to the property upon which the sign is erected. Therefore,,, in order for the applicant to main- tain the sign in its present location, the Hideaway Estates group must obtain permission f~om thepresent owners of the property to maintain the sign in its present location. If this is not possible, the sign must be moved on to the 24 foot right of way which is south east of the six foot b~ffer strip refered to in the letter from William Wickham , Esq.. The sign must be located at least two feet from any property line. The Board points out that an area identification sign with the name of the property owners in the area is very helpful to visitors of the property owners, delivery man, and operators of emergency vehicles. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and j~stice will be served and the legally established or permitted use ofneighborhood property and adjo.~ing use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by,Mr. Gillispie~. seconded by'Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that Hideaway Estates, Youngs Point,, MattitUck~ New York, be granted permission to retain an off premises name plate identification sign on ~ property that is located on the north side of a private right of way known as Miller Road off the east'side of Mill Road, Mattituck~,-New York, subject to the conditions set forth above, and subject to any subsequent changes in the~$outhold Town Zoning OrdiEance as itapplies to signsl Vote of the Board: Ayes: - Mr. Gilli~pie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse, Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- July 14, 1966 ~UBLIC ~G : Appeal NO. 883 - 8:10 P.'M.'i~E.D~S.'T.')~ Upon application of~John H. Kloppenburg, North Oak Drive, Cutchogue, New York~ for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 304 and 307, for. permission to erect an addition to an existing dwelling with insufficient side yard. Location of property: south side Albo~Drive~ Laurel, New ¥orka bounded north by'Albo Drive~ east by John Loper, south by Krogman-Loper, wes~ by Albert-Casper. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavitattesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak.for this application? MR. KLOPPENBURG: I ask that the application be granted. The Board view both plan A and B as submitted by the applicant for the proposed addition to his dwelling. The Board also discussed an alternative location for the pro- posed addition. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present,ho wishes to speak against this application? ~ ~(There was no response.) After investigation and i~spection the BoRrd.finds that the applicant'request-permissipn to erect an. addition to an ex isting dwelling with insufficient side yard area. The addition will consist of a~porch, dining room and garage. At the closest point, the addition will be five feet'from the side property line. The Board points out that the hardship involved is unique in view of the odd s~e of the lot involved. The lot in question is 151 feet on, Albo Drive and narrows do%nto approximately 34 feet at the rear'of thelot. The Board finds that this addition will not change the character of the neighbhorhood. This will be a one family dwelling in e a one family dwelling area. The addition t°~uilding shall be constructed as setforth in "Plan A"submitted by the applicant to the Board of Appeals. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -ll- July 14, 1966 The Board finds~hatstrict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or un~cessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spiri~ of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. On motion by M_r. Bergen,. seconded by Mr. ~Hulse, it-was RESOLVED that John H. Kloppenburg~ North Oak Drive, Cutchogue~ New York, be granted permission to erect an addition to an existing dwelling with insuffident side yard area on property located on the south side of~Albo Drive, Laurel, New York, ~W~subject to the following condition: 1. No part' of the proposed additi on ~to the existing dwelling shall be closer than five (5) feet to the westerly property line. vote of the Boar :: illispie, Mr. Bergen,. Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal NO. 884 - 8:20 P. Mj(E.D.S.T.), Upon .application of Devola Bassord, a/c To Have and TQHold Corp.,~ R.F.D~' 3, Yorktown Heights, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,. Section 303 and Article X, Section 1000A, and the State of'New York Town Law~ Section 280A, forpermission to divide property with insufficient frontage and for approval ofaccess. Location of property: south side Main Road~ east'Cu~hogue, New Tork, bounded north by Main Road, east by G.W. Wells, south by-S. Tayior~~ westbyR.W. Richmond-Taylor. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance and recognition of access, legal ~notice of hearing,~ affida~it~attesting to its publication ~n the of~cial newspaper, and notice to the applicant. The Chairman and the Board viewed the survey'of the property in question. THE CHA/RMAN: How many lots do you plan tohave in the back here? Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- July 14, 1966 MRS. BASSFORD: Ihaven~tthought really if I would like to have one or two lots back there. I have to sell something and that is wh~E I want to divide this property. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions for the applicant? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? :(There was no response.) After investigation~and inspectionthe Board finds that the applicant wishes to divide property setting Off two lots on an existing road. Both lots to be created are 12, 500 square feet~of area. The applicant also has 80 foot-frontage on the road which she wishes to set'aside for access to property in 'the rear. The Board points OUtm~at-the 80 foot access set aside may not be built upon or~ not be sold by the applicant. The 80 foot'access in only to be used to enter the property in the rear. The division of this property will be in keeping with the spirit of the Ordinance and the character of the neighbrohood will not be changed. The Board finds that strict'application pf the Ordinance will Produce practical difficulties orunnecessaryhardship; the hardst~p created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of'this property and in the same use district; and th evariance does observe the spirit of~the Ordinance and will notchange the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Gill~pie, seconded by M_r. Hulse~ it was RESOLVED that Devoia Bassfo~ a/c To Have and To Hold Corp.,~R~F-.~D.' 3~ Yorktown Heights~ New York,. be granted permission to divide property located on the sou~h side Main Road, East~Cutchogue,~ New York. Vote Of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispiel~ FLr. Bergen,~' Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. So~tho~d Town Board of Appeals -13- July 14, 1966 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 886 - 8:40 PoM~'i~.D.-SjTj), Upon application of George Barzac~ Jr.. Boisseau Avenue~ Southold~ New York, for avariance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Artic~ III, Section 304, for permission to build an addition to an ex isting ~welling with insufficient-setback from a private road. Location of property: east side BOissdau Avenuea and P~ivate road, Southold, New York, boundednorth by private road-Walter~Sawicki, eastby F. Moffat, south by railroad-Cassidy, west by'~ Boisseau Avenue. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing byreading the application for a variance, legal notice of hexing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official neWspaper~ and notice to the applicant. THECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present Who wishes to speak for this application? MR. BARZAC:w~~ I offer some further evidence. I have brought a sketch/~6l- This addition will be 13 feet from the private road. THE CHAIRMAN: It~hown 10 feet' from the private road on the application. MR, BARZAC: That was a rough sketch. MR. HULSE: ~(~resenting photograph to Mr. Baraac) This is the house in question? MR.' BARZAC: Yes it is. THE CHAIRMAN: The depth of this lot in question is 240 feet? MR. BARZAC: A~tually it is 1000 feet deep. THE CHAIRMAN: Actually you have the house on the northwest corner. This plot you own is 1000 feet deep by 560 feet frontage. That is apProximatelyl2½ acres. MR. HULSE: This is the only place you could put the hous.e~ MRS' BARZAC: When we built the.~house the con~ctwas drawn ~- . .-_ -~:- - up by Mr. R. Terry. We were told we only needed 10 feet from the private road. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -14- July 14~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Did you apply for a building permit? MR. BARZAC~ I was not-aware that a building permit~was not obtained. , This is a hardship for me. THE CHAIRMAN: This is a self imposed hardship. And in view of the size of the PlOt you have, I can see no hardship. Do you plan to use this private road for access to the lots that you might sell to the rear of your house? MR. BARZAC: I am not permitted to do that. THE CHAIRMAN: Who owns the right of way? MR. BARZAC: Walter Sawicki. In 1959 he sold eight lots on this right of way and gave use each rights to use it. (The use of the present right of way was discussed. Also discusses were future roads that Mr. Barzac might put through on his property.) THE CHAIRMAN: In view ofthe fact that this is a self imposed hardship we can't ~ive you relief. Is 'this a two car garage that you want to add to the ~elling? MR. BARZAC: This was originally'set up as a carport. Now we need to make it a garage. In 1959 this right of way was es~tablished as a road by the Long Island~ Lighting Company. ~n 1961 a building permit was issued to J. Delehanty to buil~ his house. HOHARDTERRY:, Building Inspector: That was before the right of waywas approved by the Board of Appeals~ ~he Chairman read the reasoning of the Board of Appeals in t~e application of J. Milcetic. It was at this time that the Board of Appeals re,eognized the access over the right of way in question.) MR. BAR, AC: The house without the garage wouldhave been 36 feet fromthe road. The Building Inspector said it could be 10 feet from'the building line. This statement was made in front of me personally. Either the Building Inspector made a mistake or the builder is lieing, or the Building Inspector does not know his job. By no granting this application there will be a great hardship for me. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -15- July 14, 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Why can't you put the garage on the other side of the houee? MR.' BAR,AC: I can't. I have sliding'glass doors on the other side of the house. THE CHAIRMAN: Lots of people have the ~ same hardship. MR~ BARZAC: This hause would have been built 35 feet from the road if there had not'been a mistake made by'someone. THE CHAIRMAN: Zoning is concerned with the use of land. We can not grant this variance. This is a self imposed hardship. MR. BARZAC: A building permit was issued to Mr. Delehanty 10 feet from the property line. THE CHAIRMAN: That was before the access was recognized. MR.' BARZAC: This has been an established right of way since 1959. THE CHA/_RMAN: The access was notapproved until 1-964. MR. B~/{ZAC: If youhad not approved the access~ these lots would be useless? THE CHAIRMAN: That is correct. MR. ~: I don~t think that's an!rway'to run a town. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything f~ther to be ~-~ said for this application? (Therewas no response.) THE CHAIRMNA: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission to erect'an addition to an existing dwelling, with insufficient side yard. The proposed addition would be approximately l0 feet from an established right of way. The Board points out that this is a self imposed hardship in view of the fact thatthe applicant Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- July 14, _1966 did not obtain a building permit before starting construction of~'the addition to the existing dwelling/ The Board points out that-the applicant~owns approximately 12 1/2 acres of land and to grant a variance to build closer than 35 feet to the private right of way would not be in keeping with the spirit of the Ordinance. The Board further points out that the right of way in question was granted recognition of access by theBoard of Appeals in 1964. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will not produce practical difficulties or unnecesary hardship; · the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by'all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property an~ in the same use district; and the variance does not observe the spirit of the Ordir~nce and will change the character of the district. On motion byMr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse,. it was RESOLVED that George Barzac, Jr., Boisseau-Avenue~-Southold~ New York~ be denied permission to build an addition to an existing dwelling with insuffic~e nt setback from a private road on property located on the east side of Boisseau Avenue and private road, $outhold, New York. Vote of'the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bezgen, Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse~ PUBLICHEARING: Appeal No 887 - 8:50 P. Mi~i~.D~SZ~T.)~ Upon application of James J. Kreh. Main Road, Mattituck, New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the'Zoning Ordinance, Article IV~ Section 408~ Subsection A~ for permission to erect a ground~sign with insufficient setback. Location of property: north west cornerof the Main Road and Fact~y'Avenue, Mattituck, New York, bonnded n~th by land now or formerlyof Mattituck Trucking Company, east by Factory Avenue~ south by Main Road, west by land now or formerly of Tidewater Oil Company. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special..exception, legal notice of hearing~ affidavit · attesting foxes publication in the offi~ newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -17- July 14~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes~to speak for this application? JAMES KREH: Fir.. Wickham was subpose to representrme~ but he couldn't come down. MR.~ BERGEN: How big is the sign~ MR.' KREH: It-will be a standard sign. There is a picture of it there. The Chairman read the following from the Building permit application: "I would li~e to place a Dairy'Queen sign just i~side the monument on the southeast corner-of-the p~oerty~ This location is 31 feet north of thetravelled part of the main. opinion highway and 7 feet~north or.the sidewalk. It is~ in my-~px~ themost desirable location for such a sign to allow for proper access and parking for cars. ,The sign also should be as close to the highway property as .possible since the large billboards on the eastside of Factory-Avenue block off the proper view to my propertyfrom the east. "Enclosed are plot plans of the prQ~rty and ~ sketch showing the building and sign requested. "I~e sign is approximately'3 feet by 3 feet." THE CHA/RMAN: We can't gNant permission forthis sign on ~property. MR~ KREH: We would want the extreme minimum. is THE CHAIRMAN: This/a doubled face sign~ MR. KREH: Right. THE CHAIRMAN:. It looks like three feet ~rom the property line would be the ~bsolute minimum. A~e~here any other questions? ~There was no r~espons~.) TheCHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speakagainst~this application? ~Th~re was no responses) Southold-Town Board of Appeals -18- July 14, 1966 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant wishes to erect a ground sign with'insufficient setback from the highway. The top of the sign Will be approximately five feet by eight feet and will read "Dairy Queen", identifing the business of the applicant. The Board finds that this sign is in the interest of the traveling public. The Board suggest-that the applicant ~uffer the bottom of the sign with concrete~blocks in order to prevent the sign from being knocked over. The Board finds that the public convenience an~etfa~e and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or'substantially injured and the'spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On ~motion by Mr. Bergen,. seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that James J. Kreh, Main Road, Mattituck, New York, be granted permission to erect a ground sign with insufficient setback from the ~xproperty line. on property located on the north west-corner of the Main Road andFactory Avenue, Mattituck, New York, Subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be granted for one (1) year only, renewable annually upon~wx written application to the Boazd of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes '~rrthe.~T:Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to Signs. 3. This sign shall be erected atleast three (3) feet from any property line. 4. No part of this sign shall overhang on State property. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~, Mr. Bergen, Doyen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 888 - 9:00 PjM..(E.D.S.T.), Upon application of Greenport Playhouse, Inc.~, 163 Merrick Road, Merrick, New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article IV, Section 408,~ Subsectinn A & B, for permission to ~e~ain an on premises ground sign and an on premises wall sign. Location of property: north side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by King Greenport Association, b Cha e± east b Kin Greenport,Association, south by Main Roa~w~t~y Lan~. Y g ~ee pa~ ~.vv Southold Town Board of Appeals -19- July 14, 1966 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a speciali~sxception, legal notice ofhearing~, affidavit attesting to--publication in the official newspaper,, and notice to the applicant. TPIECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MRj HERMAN FICKEN: I represent the company. THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions for Mr. Ficken ? ~There was no response.)' THE CHAIRMAN: The application is very complete. Is there anyon present who wishes ~to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requestpermission to retain a g~mmg~3x"coming at~ractions" sign~ mLk~xwhich is oversized, and the word "SKYWAY" on the back wall of the m~vie screen.. It is in the interest of safety and Welfare that the "coming attractions" sign be maintained at its present size. If the sign was made to~w~zmx conform to the present zoning regulations, smaller letters would have to be used on the sign~ thus making it more difficult for the passing traffic to see what attraction is coming to the theater. The Board believesthat such a sign is in the interest of the traveling public as a place of amusement. The Board finds that the public convenience andwelfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood propertyand adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the F~spirit of the Ordinance will be ohs.~rved, · n motiont~Mr. Hulse,. seconded by'Mr. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that Greenport'Playhouse, Inc.~ 163 Merrick Road, Merrick, New York, be granted permission to retain an oR~ premises ground sign and an on premises Wa~l sign on propertylocated on the north side Main Road, Greenport~ New York, subjecthowever, to the following conditinns: 1. The signs shall be granted for one (1) year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- July 14,. 1966~ 2. The signs shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the $outhold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The ground sign shall be erected at least five ~(5) feet from any property line. Vote or'the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 889 - 9:15 P~M%~EjD. S.~Tj)., U~on application of JosephCherepowicz, Main Road,~ East Marion, New ¥ork~ for'a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Artide III~ Section 300~ SubsectiOn 8a for permission to retain farm Stand sign. Location of property: south side Main Road-,-East Marion, New York, bounded north by Main Road~ east by Marion Manor Subs-Manor Grove Corp., south by~J. Elswor~h- Reeve~ west by Shipyard Lane-Ors. Feepaid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading~l~e application for a special exception~ legal notice of'hearing~affidavit attesting to i~s publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes tO speak fo~ this application? ~There was no res$onse.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone presentwho wishes to speak against this application? i~There was no response.) ~he Board of Appeals and Mr. Howard Terr~ b~lding inspector discussed what signs were requested by the applicant.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything to be said for or against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission to retain farm stand signs at his farm stand located on the south side of the Main Road, East Marion. The Board grants the applicant permission to Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- July 14, 1966 the applicant to display'a sign on the north si~e of the buil~g and on the east side of the building. This permission is in lieu of a single or double face ground sign. It has been the experience · ~m of the Board tha~'often a ground sign fora farm standcan be a traffic hazard. The signs to be erected are to be four feet (4) by six feet~ (6). The Board finds that the p~blic convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of'the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by ~ir. Gillispie, seconded by'Fir. Bergen, it~was RESOLVED that Joseph Cherepowicz~ Main Road, East Marion~ New York~ be granted permission to erect a wall sign on the ~w~U north side and on the east side of the farm stand building. Location of property: south side Main Road~ East~Marion~ New York. This permission is granted subject~to the following conditions: 1. The signs shall be granted~for one (1) year'only~ renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2.'-The signs shall be subject'~ to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The applicant shall agree that there will be no ground sign. of any type erected at this site. 4. The signs to be erected shall be no larger than four (4) feet by six ~(6) feet. Vote of'the Board: Ayes: Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyen~ Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC BT~.ARING: Appeal No. 890 - 9:30 P~'M~'[E~D~SoT.), Upon application of'Felix Dor~oski, a/c Cutchogue AutoSales, Main Road, Cutchgoue~ New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinances-Artide IV, Section 408, Subsection B, for permission to retain a projecting wall sign. Location of property: 'north side MainRoad, Cutchogue~ New York, bounded north by M. Doroski Est., eaStby F. Doroski~ south byMain Road, west by E.~A. White. Fee paid $5.00. Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- July ~24, 1966 The Chairman opened the hearing by.reading ~the applicati for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present-who~uk~wishes to speak for this application? FELIX DOROSKI:' That would be me. MR. HULSE: What is the size of the sign? MR.' DOROSKI: ~wo and one half feet by four feet. Something like that. THE' CHAIRMAN: Is it four feet long? MRS' DOROSKI: MaM3se three and one half feet long. Something like that. I am n~sure how long it is. THE-(~HAIMRAN: I think you need a bigger sign. The reason for this violation is because a sign can not project more than one foot off the face of the building. This .is in the interest of safety, so that truck don't hit the sign. MRS' DOROSKI: A truck wouldhit the building before it would hit the sign. THE CHAIRMAN: You do not have a ground sign do you? MR.~ DOROSKI:We have a "Mobile" sign. MR.~ BERGEN: Thi~/~projecting over his own plDperty. I caner seen any objection to it. to MR.~ HULSE: Wetallowed Koke Bros./do the w~ same thing. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyonepresent who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant~request permission to retain a wall sign which projects more than one foot off the face of the building. The ~n in question is approximately one ~nd half fe~t by three and one half feet and will project four feet off the front of the building? The si~n will be overhanging on the property of Southold Town Board of Appea~s -23- July 14, 1966 the applicant. The budding which the sign is mounted on sets back35 feet from the w~z street property line. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by M_r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that FelixDoroski, a/c Cutchogue~Auto Sales, Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, be granted permission to retain an on premises projecting wall sign as applied for the application to the Board of Appeal~ on property located on the north side of the Main Road, Cutchogue~ New York, subject to the following conditions: 1. The ~ sign shall be granted for one year (1),renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent shanges in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The applicant agrees not'to erect a ground sign to advertise the product which is advertised on the wall sign granted in this application. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen Mr. Doyens Mr. Hulse~ PUBLIC ~ING: Appeal No. 900 - 9:40 PjM.'~.D.S.T.), Upon application of Fred W. Kaelin, Main Street~ Cutchogue, ~ew York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning'Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection B, for permission to retain a sign projecting more than one foot ~rom the front of the building. Location of property: south~side Main Road, Cutchggue, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by S. Hand, south by Fire District~ west by-C~P~~ Tuthill. Fee paid $5.0~. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice ofhearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- July 14~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? '~Mi{. KAELIN: I hope you grant my petition. THE CHAIRMAN: Your sign overhangs the State property is thatright? MR,-KAELIN~. Right. THE CHAIRMAN: We are nO'allowed to grant or not to grant permission for a sign thatoverhangs privateproperty. In other words we would have to deny thisapplication. MR, DOYEN:-Can't you move the sign to the easterly~end of the building? MR~ KAELIN~: It would n~t'be seen coming from the west. THE CHAIRMAN: We have no authority to do anything on~ private property. MR. KAELIN: Does the Town have jurisdiction over anything that is the State property. THElCHAIRMAN: Yes~ but I don~t kn~w if I can tell you what they are. HOWARD TERRY, Building Inspector: The Town has jurisdiction over anything that has to do with publicsafety. THE CHAIRMAN: That would include this sign. MR. KAELIN: There is about five foot difference in the setback from one end ofthe building to the other. (An alternative location for the sign in question was discussed. It was proposed that 'the sign could be located on a pole on the easterly end of the property. This way it would not be overhanging State property.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ~There was no response.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -2'5- July 14~ 1966 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicantrequest permission to retain a projecting wall sign. The Board finds that the wall signin question projects over State property. The Board points o~ that the Board of Appeals can not grant permission for a sign to overhang State property. Thee Board has jurisdiction in t~is matter. The Board further points out that an overhanging sign such as requested by the applicant is.a hazard to the safety and welfare of the To~n of Southold. The Board f~s that'the public convenience'and welfare and justice will/he-served, and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will be permanently or substantially injured and the~ ir-it of the Ordinance will not be observed. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Fred W. Kaelin, Main Street, Cutchogue, New York, be denied permission to retain a projecting wall sign on property located on the south side Main Road, Cutchogue New York~ as applied for in the application to the Board of Appeals. However~ the Board of Appeals does ~ grant permission to the applicant to ~-~x relocate the existing simon a post on the northeasterly corner of the building~ providing that no part of the sign overhangs State property. Said permission is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be granted for one year'(l) only, renewable annually, upon written application to theBoard of Appeals. 2. The signshall be subject to all~w~"z~x subsequent changes in the Southold Town'Zoning ~rdinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Giilispie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyem~N~. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 901 -- 9:50 P.M.'.(E.D~S.-T.), Upon application of Sunset Motel, 312 North Road, Greenport, New York, for a special exception in accordancewith the Zoning Ordinance, Article IVy. Section 408, Subsection A~ for permission to retain a directional sign on theproperty of George Telles. Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- July 14, 1966 Location of property: south side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Herman Sill~ south by Herman Sill, west by C.. Ryan. Fee paid $5.00. .The~Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception~ legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to itys publication in theofficial newspaper~ and notice 'to the applicant. THE CHA/_RMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak fort=his application? VERNA MOLIN: It was granted at-the time the sign was put up originally. THE CHAIRMAN: How big is the sign? VER~ MOLIN: The sign is 4' by 12,~. It was granted at the time we built in 1960. HOWARD TERRY: It-was granted at-the time the Board was giving permission for 50 Sq~re feet for directional signs. THE CHAIRMAN:Do you'recall in what year itwas originally granted? VERNA MOLIN: In 1960. THE CHAIRMAN: We can't change the size we originally granted unless the Ordinance is changed. VERNA MOLIN: We w~x could leave them as they'are now until the X Ordirmnce is changed or until theyneed to be replaced. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? '(There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission to retain a directional sign on the property of George Telles. Said property owner has given written permission to the applicant to place a sign on his property. The sign in question is 4 feet'by 12 feet.. It was originally granted by the Board of Appeals in 1960 at the time th'e Board was' allowing 50 square feet'~for a directional sign. The Board believes this sign, a directional sign~for a motel, is in the interest of the travelling public. Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- July 14, 1966 The Board finds that the public convenience~and welfare and justice'will be served and the legally'established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently'or substanti~ly injured and the spirit of the Ordinancewill be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLED ~hatSunset Motel~ 312 North Road, Greenpor~ New York~ be granted permission to retain a directional sign on the property of George Telles~ located on thA south side of the Main Road, Greenport, New York, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be granted forone year icl), renewable annually upon writeen application torte Board of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. This sign shall be located at least five ~) feet from any property lines. 4. This sign shall be located at least three i¥~) feet abo~e ground level. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen~ Mr. Hulse, Mr. Doyen. PUBLIC HEARINGh Appeal No. 902 - Upon application of~w~ Sunset Motel, 312 NorthRoad, Greenport, New York, .for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300~-Subsection 10~ for'permission to retain directiunal signs atthe following locations: 1) on the property of Valentine Ruch~ located on the south side of t~e North Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by North Road, east byV. Poliwoda, south by J.H. Cassidy~ west~by private ROad; 2) on the property ofClemintine F. Rutko~ski Estate, located on the south side Main State Rgad, EastMarion, New York, bounded north by Main Road=~te~ east by'Shipyard Lane, south byCleave Point-Corp., west by'Cleaves Point-Corp. Fee paid $5.00 Southold Town Board of Appeals -28- July 14~ 1966 TMR Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special excdption, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in theofficial n~spaper ~ and no~ice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present Who wishes to speak in favor of this application? i(There was no response.) THE CHA/_RMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in opposition to this application? [There was no response.) After investigation and inspection theBoard finds that the applicant request permission to retain directknal signs on the property-of Valentine Ruch and Cl~intine F. Rut~owski Estate. Said propertylo~ners have given written permission to the applicant to retain a sign on their property. The signs in question are four feet by'twelve feet. They were originally granted by the Board of Appeals in 1960 at the time the Board ~-was allowing 50 squre feet for a directional sign. The Board believes these s igns~, directional signs for a motel, are in the interest of the travelling public. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanentlyor substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by,Lt. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that'Sunset Motel~ 312 North Road,. Greenp~rt, New York~ be granted permission to retain direct~ional signs at the following locations: 1) on the property of Valentine Ruch~ located on the south side of the North Road~ Greenport New York~ 2)onthe~property of~'~Clemintine F~ RUtkowski Estate, located on the south side Main State Road,. EAst Marion, Subject to the following conditions: 1. Both signs shall be granted for one ~1) year only, renewable annually.upon w~itten application to the Board of Appeals. 2.'~ sign shall be subject to all~e~~_ changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Southold Town Board of Appeals -29- July 14, 1966 3. Both signs shall be located at least five (5) feet from any-property line. 4. Both signs shall be located at least'three ~3) feet from ground level. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. Mr. William Fiedler appeared before the Board for an informal discussion ~ and to submit~an application to the Board for permission to erect a garage for the storage of a car. The Board advisedMr. Fieldler that the applicatbn would be set up fora hearing. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 885 - 8:30 P.-M.' (E~-D~S~T.), Upon application of AlbertID. Dawson, &-Wf., Fishers Island, New York~ forlrecognition of access in accordance with the-State of New York Town~LawSection~80A. Location of property: north side~MontaukAvenue~ Fishers Island, New York, bounded north by Albert'Dawson,~ east'by West Harbor, south by Montauk Avenue west by'Montauk Avenue. Fee paid $5,00. The Chairman opened the k~nearingby reading the application for ~ecognition of access, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newsp~per~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is There anyone present,to wishes to speak for this application? (There was no respense.) ~ CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ~(.There was no response.) $outhold Town Board of Appeals -30- July 14, 1966 After investigation and inspecti6n the Board finds that the applicant request permission to cutthrough and use a right of way. The Board grants permission as applied for, and points out that the right of way must mm~w~a~W~.meet the mininum requirements for the passage of emergecyvehicles. Pinal approval of the Right of way sha~ be subject to the approval of the Building Inspector. The Board finds that strict application ofthe Ordinance will produce practicall difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship~x created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the ~-Yx~ variance does observe the spirit ofthe Ordinance. On motion by Mr.~ Doyen, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was 'RESOLVED thatAlbert W. Dawson &Wf., Fishers Islandj New York, be granted approvgl of access on p~perty located on the north side MontaukAvenue, Fishers Island, New York. Vote of the Beard: Ayes:- M_r. Gillsipie, Mr. Bergen,~ Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. 'On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was ~ESOLVED in accordance with a letter received from the Mattituck-Lions Club, the Board of Appeals grants permission to the MattituckLions Club to maintain a bullentin board on the front of the building housing the office of Mr. J. McNulty. It is the opinion of the Board that. this sign is in the public in~erest. Vote of the Board: Ayes:9 Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Doyen, Mr. Hulse. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED THATthe minutes of the $outhold .Town Bca rd of Appeals dated June 30, 1966 be approved as' submitted. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen. Mr. Doyen, ~x Mro Hulse. Southold Town Board of Appeals -31- July 14, 1966 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by-Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED thatthe Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 7:30 P-MJ:(E-D.~S~T.), Thursday, July ~28, 1966, at the Town. Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of~hearing upon application of Morrison C. Wines, Hamilton-Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, ~ as it refers to Article III~ Section 303, and Article X, Sdction 1000A, for permission to divide property with insufficient frontage. Location of~operty: east-side Love Lane, Mattituck, New York, bounded north byM~G.' Wines, east by Maiden Lane~ South by Railroad, westby G.L~ Penny. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:40 P.M..(E.D.'S.'T~), Thursday, July28, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing upon application of'Stanley Coz-win, Esq.., Greenport, New York, a/c'Elpineke Kralides, EastrMarion, New York, for a variance in accordance with the_Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, for permission ~o construct a dwelling on a lot with insufficient area. Location of property: north east~cornez Cedar Drive and Stars Road, Eastmarion, New York, bounded north by-Stamos~ east by Frumenti, south by Stars Road, west by'Cedar'~ve. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-ALL On motion by Mr. Doyen~ ~zw~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVE~-that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:50 P.F~i(E~DjSjT%)~ Thursday, July28, 1966, at the Town Office~ Main Road, Southold,~ New York, upon application of'Roland Bollman, Beebe DriVe and Antler Lane, CUtchogue~ New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 6, and Article III, Section 304, for permission to build and accessory building with reduced setback. Location of property: south west corner of~Antler'Lane and Beebe Drive~ Lot number 26, in Moose Cove Estates,. Cutchogue, New York Vote of-the Board: Ayes:- Sou~hotd Town Board of Appeals -32- July 14~ 1966 On motion by-Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that-the Southold Town Board or'Appeals set 8:00 P.M~(E.~S,T~-), Thursday, July 28~ 1966, at the Town Office,..Main Road, SouthOld, New York.. as-~he time and place of-hearinq upon application of Browns Hills~ Inc., Private Road, Orient, ~ew York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinances P~ticle III, Section 300, Subsection 9, for permission to retain area identification andmme plate sign at the entrance to Brown Hills~ located on the north side Route 25, Orient~ New York bounded north by'Long Island Sound, east by Ruth Young, south by Main State Road~ west by J. B. Droskoski. Est. Vote of the Board: Ayes:--'~w. On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by'Mr. Bergen, it-was RESOLVED that the Southold Town. Board of Appeals set8:05 (E~D. S2T.), Thursday~ July 14, 19~6, at the Town-Office, Main Road Southold, New York~ as the time and place of~hea~ing upon application of Gulf~OiI ~®rpora~ on~ PjO.' Bpx128, Oceanside New York, for a special exception in accordance with the'Zoning Ordinance, Article IVy. Secticn408~. Subsection A, for permission to· retain~a pole sign with insufficient setback~at the GulfService Station located on thenorth west corner of Route 25 and Cox'Lane,-Cutchogue~ New Yozk~ bounded north by J.~ Pietrewicz~ east-by'Cox-Lane,. south by Main Road, west by J.-Rietreqicz. Vote of the Board: Ayes~. ALL On motion by M re Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED THAT the Southold Town Board ofAppeals set'8:lSP.M. ~E.D.'S~T~)~Thursday, J~ly 14, 1966, at the Town Office~ Main R°ad, Southold~ ew York ~s the time and place of hearing upon application of GuldOil Corporation~ P.~-O%- Box 128~ Oceanside~ New York, for a special exception in accordance with 'the Zoning Ordinance~ Article IV~ Section 408, Subsection A, for. permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback at the Gulf'Service Station~ located on the north side Main Road~ Southold, New York, bounded north by F.H.' Sa~e, east byF~H.- Sayre~ south by Main Road, west by F~-M.'.B~aschach. VOle-of'the Board: Ayes: ALL Southotd Town Board or'Appeals -33- July 14, 1966 On mo%ion by Mr. Doyen., seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED thatthe Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:30 P.'M.~%D.'S~j), Thursday, JulyS.28,, 1966, at the TOwn Office~ Main Road, Southold, New York, as.the ti me and place of-hearing upon application of Fisherman's Beach, Nassau Point~ Cutchogue~ New York, for a special exception i~ accordance with theZoning'Ordinance, Article III, Section 300,~Subsection 10, for permission to retain an area identification and name plate signs on theproperty of William Johnston. Location of property~ E. 60 feet of'lot number 32 and all of tot 33 in Peconic Bay Prop., Inc. Sub.~ ~Fishersman's Beach), Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: _ALL /~ On motion by Mr. Hulse~ seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southo~d,]c~W ToWn Board of'Appeals set 8:40 P~M..(~D.~S~T~..~ Thursday, July 28, 1966, at-the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing upon~ application of Camp Immaculata, Peconic Bay Blvd.~. Mattituck~ New York, for a special exceptbn in accordancewith the Zoning O~d~e~ Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for'permission to ret~ina directional sign on the southwest'corner of'Main Road and Bray'Aveanue,~ Mat~ituck, New York, bounded north by'Main Road~ eaSt-by'Bray'Avenue, south byW. Tuthill, west byeS. Kander. Vote of the Board: A~ES: On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by'Mr. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set8:50 P.F~(E.'DjS~T~), ~ursday, July~28~ t966~ at the To~n~ OffiCe~ Main Rea~, Southold~ ew York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of~C~mp Immaculata,. PecOnic BayBl~d.~ Mattituck, New York, for'a special exception in accordance with~the Zoning Ordinance, Article IVy-Section 408, Subsection A~ for permission to retain-an on premises ground sign with insufficinet setback. Location of property: north side PeconicBayBlvd.~ Mattituck, New York~ bounded north by Henry'Pllack~ east by~L. Ellen & Orso~ south-by Peconic Bay~Blvd., west by Brayley'and Ors. Vote of'the Board: Ayes:- ALL% Southold Town Board of'Appeals -34- July.14~ ~1966 On motion by M_r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse~ it was RESOLVED that-the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:00 P-'M~i~E.DjS~Tj),. Thursday, July 28, 1966, at the TownOffice, Hain Road, Southold, N~~ York~ as the time and place ofhearing upon application of~CampMolloy, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV~ Section 408, Subsection A,. for-permission to retain an on premises ground sign with insufficient setback. Location of property: north side Main Road, Mattituck~ New York, bounded nDrth by'Laurel Lake~. east byChas. A.'~rice~ and Ors., south by Hain Road, west'by J.~ Stokes~ Town of Southold. · Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL On motion by Mrl Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gill!spie~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:10 P.~M.~ED.'SjT~')~ Thursday, July'~8~ 1966~ atthe TownOfficg, Hain Road; Southold, New York,. as the time andplace ofhearingupon applicationof Mattituck Theater, Main Road, Mattituck,~ New for a special excep~on in accordance with theZon~ g OrdinanCe, Article IV~ Section 408~ Subsection 7, for permission to retain two 6nPremises ground signs. Location of property: east'side Main Road, Mattituck, New York,. bounded north by Hedwig Kander, east by'A.W~ BouCher Est.~ south by George W. Newell, west by Main Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL On motion by Mr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr Hulse~. it was RESOLVED that the Southold ToWn Board of Appeals set 9:20 P~D~S~Ti~), Thursday~ July 28, 1966,, at. the Town-Office, Main~Road,~ Southold, New York,~ as the time and place of~hearing upon application ofT he First Bap~ist~Church~ Gre~port, New for.a special exception in accordance with~the'Zoning~Ordinance, Artic~IV~ Section 408,. Subsection~A, for permission 'to re~n a directional sign on the property of Suffolk Outdoor~Advertising Co.,. Inc., located on the southwest corner or'the north Road and Main~Street, Greenport~ New York, bOunded north by Hain Road, east by Main Street, south by~C. Henkel, west by'Eugene W. Mazzaferro. Vote of ~he Board: Ayes: A~L Southold TownBoard of Appeals -35-- July 14, 1966 On motion by~F~. Gillispie, seconded by'Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:30 P.M~(E.D.'S~T.),. Thursday,, July 28, 1966,~ at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New ~ork,, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Mid-Island Lumber and Supply~Co., Inc., 415 RoanokeAvaenue, Riverhead, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,.-Section 300, Subsection 10, for~permission to retain an advertising sign on the proper~ty of'Martin Weglicki~ Aocation of property: south side Main Road, Laurel, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Fleischman-K~hn, south by'Long Island Ra~ilroad, west by-C has McNulty, Est. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr, Bergen, seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set .9:45 P~'F~!(E.'D~S~'Tj), Thursday, July28, 1966, at the Town-Office~ Main Road, Southold, New'~ork, as the time and place ofhearing upon application of Silvermere Bungalows, Silvermere Ro~d, Greenport New York, for a special exception in accordancewith the Zoning Ordinance, ArtiCle Iv, Section 408,-Subsection A~ forpermission to retain a directinaal sign on the so~thwestcorner'ofMain Road and Silvermere Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by.'Silvermere Road, south by Railroad, west by Nassau Brick~Co. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On'mD tion by'Mr. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RES~LVRD that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:50 P.M.~'Di'S%'T~), Thursday~ July 28, 1966, at the Town ~ffice, Main Roadl Southold, New York, as the time and place of'hearing upon application off'William H. Fiedler~ North Road, Southold, New York~ for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, ~ as it refers to Article III, Section 300,. Subsection 6,. for permission to build a private garage with reduced setback on the former land ofHelmutHass. Location of property: private right of way-off'the south si~ of the North Road,~ SoUthold, New York, bounded north by private right of way-land of Hass, east by privat right-of way-other land or'bass, south by Other land of Hass, Mill Creek, west by Mill Creek - Other land of Hass Vote of the BOard: Ayes: ALL Southold Town Board of'AppealS -36- July 14, 1966 The next regular meeting of the SGuthold Town Board of Appeals will be held at 7:30 P~'M., Thursday,. July 21, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P~'M. Respectfully-- submitted~ BarbaraC. Dittmann, Secretary Southold Town Board of' Appeals APPROVED g~,~Chairman Board of' APpeals