Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAllocating Water w/the MarketAllocating Water With the ~erkst Water is one of our most precious resources. We went to usa it appropriately rot ourselves today andp~esarve it adequately rot the future. What is the most reasonable way to accomplish this goal? Fo~ many years water waa ~agardad aa virtually a "free" good. The "supply" was g~eater than tho "demand." When this proved to be untrue in one a~ea~ other areas were available. The price of water stayed comparatively low, ~eflecting essen- tially the cost oF delivery. Today, in many areas, the "demand" is perceived as exceeding "supply°" This has happened because sa peculation, development and technology have Increased, the demands fo~ water have also increased. In addition, some supplies of water have become polluted, so the available quantity of quality water ham decreased. For many products, economics tells us that a market system would allow price to equate demand and supply and to allocate the product efficiently to those uses most desired by society (given the distribution of income.) Wate~ ia not one of those p~oducts. A market system for water will not wo~k for several reasons. (L) Water delivery ia a natural monopoly. It is more efficient to have one delivery system for an area. Constructing two piping systems to allow consumers to choose would be a duplication of costs. Othe~ dalivazy systems (tank t~ucks) would also be more costly in most situations. 2 Since it ia more efficient, a permit mill be ~lven to one =afar company in an area. It than has a monopoly, The utility can then charge high rates because mater ia a product mith iow price elasticity, Society has always decided that ouch utilities must be regulatad. (2) A market system mill not mark for water because th®re are many externalities in the production of maters the privets caste differ from the social coats. ( Social coats ere the sum of all the costa attributable to the production, whether borne by the producer or by others.) Considering aquifer mater only the folloming externalities exist: 1 aa The pumping of water from a mall may cause other =ells to run dry,orincreaae pumping costs in these other wells. b. The pumping of mater may cause salt water intrusion into the aquifer, damaging water supplies of others, c. The pumping of mater may induce pollution into an aquifer or portion of an aquifer not previously polluted, damaging mater supplies of others. d. The pumping of mate; may affect stream floe and the uae of stream mater by others. es ~lthdramel of more water than natural recharge (mining of water} may affect the land over the equifer~ e~fecting lend USaa Nat~! monopoly leeds to high prices for mater in areas where there is a monopoly. £xternalitlea lead~ to a valuation of water mhich ia too lam. The users of mater consider only their oma costs and not tho costs of damages caused by their ual of water. 3 p~oduction or ."stero It cannot be left completely to the market. A different lystem must be round, Hopefully one ehich can lead to the usa or water In ."eye ihich reflect the values or society al · iholao It should baa policy ehich elloea everyone some accael to ."afar (subsidized Ir nacessa;¥)~ discourages masts, and directs mater into the ueel in ehich ltl value la hlghalt~ subject to changs as vliuaa change. Some possible al~ocation alternatives sram parfait system dacis%on by' "reasonable uae" restraint ,.hen usa poses po].lut.l, on problems. I Relationships described In Thomas Dumme and Luna 8. Leopold, ~at r n nv ronmente P ann n . (San Franaisco~ Freeman & Co., ~978, PP. 223-22go