HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-09/01/1966 APPEAL BOARD
MEMBERS
Robert ~'. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman
Robert Ber~len
Charles Oregonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
Fred Hulse, Jr.
hoid Town Board of Appeals
SOUTHOLD, L. I.,'~N. Y. " ~.
A ~ meeting of the Southold Town Board of
was held at 7~30 p~v~'. Thu=sday,- September it 1966,. at 'the
Tabu O£f~ #a/n Road~. Southold.. Hew
There were l~lresent~ Messrs-- Robert-W. (3~11isp~e~ ~
Ch~; Robext Bergen~ Fred Hulbea Jro~ Charles ~l~go~_~s~ Jr.
Serge Doyen.
lqJBL3~ H~ Appeal No. 945 - 7.30
~1~~ of J~ C,- Costlye 138'
~-~le ~-~~ 303~ for ~s~ to
~t mt ~ W. Bu~~-.Bs~te,~ sou~
b~. west~ C~o1~ A~ue. F~ ~4'
b~ ChaLrman opened ~e hear:Lng by read~ng the
foe a ~./~ce.. legal notice of .hear~ng.a aff~lleY~t a~:~ to
~ pUbl~L~ut~en ~n the off:Lc/al newspapere, and .Rot.~&=e to the
Southold Town Board of Appeals -2-
September 1, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
in favor of this application?
JOHN COURTENA¥: The existing dwelling has good clearance on
the north side and there is plenty of room on the south side for
the driveway. The division of the lot would include the driveway.
MRi BERGEN: Is there a dwelling on the property now?
JOHN COURTENAY: Yes.
(Mr. Courtenay pointed to the sketch of the property
in question and located the existing dwelling on the property.)
THE CHAIRMAN: How far back from the road does the house sit?
JOHNCOURTENA¥: It sits back from the road in line with the
rest of the houses.
(There was a brief discussion held on the location of
the house in regard to the proposed division line,)
T~E'CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else pressnt who wishes to
s peak for this application?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
MRS.' JOSEPH WIDIRSTKY:What are the zoning requirements?
THE CHAIRMAN: Ten feet and 15 feet.
MRS~ JOSEPHWIDIRSTKY: Ten feet on one side.and fifteen feet
on the other side?
THE CHAIRF~: Yes.
MRS, JOSEPH'WIDIRSTKY: I-~wanted to extend my garage years
ago and I couldn,t do it.
THE CHAIRMAN: Mr.-Courten~ has alot of property here.
MRS. JOSEPH WID//{STKY: I am not against it. There is a
g~rage there with a permanent foundation. What happens to it?
Southold Town Board of Appeals -3-
September 1~ 1966
JOHN COURTENAY~ The garage~ts back at'least 150 feet from
the street.line. It is on the same property with the house.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think you better get a sur~ey so that you
know what you are talking about. You need 10 feet on one side
of the house and 15 feet on the other side. Actually this is
a hardship. You have 19~.000square feet for each lot. The
minimum requirement is 12,.500 square feet.
MR.' JOSEPH BOOKER: How much frontage does he have without
including the driveway.
THE CHAIRMAN: 150 feet.
MR.~ JOSEPH BOOKER: Does Mr. Day own the driveway?
JOHN'COURTENAY: Yes. From the driveway to the south line I
own 80 feet. The garage would be on his property.
THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Courtenay~ how long would it take you
to obtain a su~ey of your property?
MR¥ COURTEHAY: About one week.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think that fae Board will postpone decision
on this case until we have a survey of the property in question.
On motion by Mr. Hulse~ seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that'a d~ision on Appeal no. 945 be postponed
until 7:30 P,M-~ Thursday,.-September 15, 1966. The Board
request that the appellant obtain a survey of the property
under application and submit same to ~e Board.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gilli~e , Fir. Bergen~
Fir. Huls~ Mr. Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 946 - 7:40 P.'M.'i(E.D.S.'T)~ Upon
application of Mrs, Warren Critchlow,. 611 Bailey'Avenue, Green--
port.~ New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article X,. Section 1007~. Subsection d, for permission
to extend non-conforming business beyond the two '(2) yearperiod
of non-use of the building and premises. Location of property:
north side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by
ErnestWiggins~ east by Ernest Wiggins,~ south by Main Road,~ west
by Oororth Careya Fee paid $5.00
Southold Town Board or'Appeals -4-
September 1~ 1966
The Chairman openedthe hearing by reading the~plication
for a variance~ legal-~otice of hearing, affidavit attesting to
its publication in th~'~ficial newspaper, and notice to the
applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone presmnt who wishes to
speak for this application?
,(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Mrs.. Critchlow, do you have anything to add
to the application?
MRS. CRITCHLOW: ~ .lost my ~usband. I can't run the place
by myself. Up until the present time I haven't been able to
find anyone to go in with me.
MR. HULSE: This building is not suited for any other purpose
but this.
MRS. CRITCHLOW: The equipment and everything is there.
THE CHAIRMAN: Have you tried to sell it, or don't you want
to se~ it~
MRS~ CRITCHLOW: It might come to where I have to sell it.
My mother is 88 years old and I take care of her. I would like
to keep her there a little bit longer.
THE~CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes ~ speak
against'this application?
(There was no~sponse,)
After investigation and inspectien the Board finds that
the appellant request permission to expand the two year non-
use period on a non-conforming use. The appellant is the owner
of "Skippers", a restaurant operation. The premises has been
used for a restaurant since 1952~ and there is no other practical
use for this property. Therefore, the Boardwill extend the
two year non-use perio~ for another'two years on this property.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -5-
September 1, 1966
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created ~ unique and would not be shared~by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance does observe
the spirit of the Ordinance and will notchange the character of
the district.
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Gillispie~ it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals grant
permission toM rs. Warren Critchlow, 611 Baile~Avenue, Greenport
New York to extend the non-conforming business beyond the two
'year period of non-use ofthe building and premises. Location
of property: north side Main Road, Greenport, New York. This
permission is granted for a two (2) year period. This is
without predjudice to another application for a further
expansion of the non-use period.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie.~ M_ri Bergen,
Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 947 - 7:50 P.~M~(E.D.S.~.), Upon
application of Douglas Beeve andSon, Inc., Main Road, Cutchogue,
New York~ for a special ex~ption in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance~ Article IV, Section ~00~ Subsection A, for permission
to retain an on premises identification ground sign with insuff-
icient heightfrom ground level. Location of property: north side
M~n-Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north bYS. Beebe~ east
by S. Beebe, south by Main Road~ west by M. Meltzer. Fee paid
$5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special_exception~ legal notice ofhearing, affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to the applicant.
THE C~IAIRMAN: Is there anyone presentwho wishes to
speak for this application?
(There was no response.)
THE-CHAIRMAN; Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against t hi s application~'
(There was no response.)
southold Town Board of Appeals -6-
September it 1966
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant request permission to retain an on premises
identification sign with insufficient height~from ground
]~vel~ The sign identifies the appellant as a builder. If
the sign was raised to the required three feet above ground
it would not be in keeping with the property in question. The
sign would also create a traffic hazard for the appellant when
coming out of his driveway if the sign was raised to three
feet above ground.level.
The Board finds that the public, convenience and welfare
and justice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use
districts will not be permanently or substantially injured
and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that Douglas Beebe and $on~ Inc., Main Road,
Cutchoguet New York, beOgranted permissiOn to retain an on
premises identification ground sign with insufficient height
from ground level on property located on the north side
Road, Cutchogue, New York, subjectw however, tothe following
conditions:
1. This sign Shall be granted for one year only~, renewable
annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals.
2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes
in the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance as it applies %o
signs.
3. This sign shall be located at least five (5) feet from
any property line.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen,
Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- September 1, 1966
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 948 - 8:00 P.Mji(E.D.S.T), Upon
application of Mattituck~Estates Subdivision, Mattituck~ New York
for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning ordinance,
Article Iii, Section 300, Subsection 9, for permission to retain
subdivision identification signs with insufficient setback at
the following locations: 1) on the entrance to Cardinal Drive
on lot number 5 in Mattituck'Estates; 2) on the property of
Mattituck Historical Society, Main Road, Mattituck~ New York$
3) two signs on the north side of New Suffolk~Avenue, at the
entrance to Blossom Blvd., on lots number 30 and 31 in Mattituck
Estates; 4~ on the north side of New Suffolk Avenue at the
entrance to Meadow Lane on lot number 45in Mattituck'Estates,
Mattituck, New York. Fee paid $5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special exception, legal notice oflhearing, affidavit
attesting to ~s publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
ALEXANDER CHASE, ESQ.': I would like to add something.
am the Secretary and CounSelor for the Subdivision. I would like
to add into the record, I have a letter signed by Martin Sidor
and Frank'Sidor. One of the signs is on their property. They
have no objection to the placing of the sign ~n their property.
I have a similar letter from the Mattituck Historical Society.
There is no objection to the placing of that sign.
THE CHAIRMAN: These are the only two of the several signs
that~are located on property that is sold?
ALEXANDER CHASE't ESQ,: That is correct.
THE CHAIRMAN: We have granted reduction in setback in
other cases.
ALEXA/~DER CHASE, ESQ.': These signs are not overly large,
just'large enough to be seen.
MRj HULSE: How far back are the signs placed?
MR. BERGEN: Fromthe center of the Main Road they are ~
63 feet. From New Suffolk Avenue they are 45 feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Do you intend to dedicate the roads in the
subdivision?
Southotd Town Board of Appeals -8- September 1% 1966
ALEXA~ER CHASE, ESQ.: They are in the Town's hands now.
MR. HULSE: How far from that road line are the signs?
MR. BERGEN: There is 63 feet between the two signs. They
are on private property five to seven feet from theroad line.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant request permission to retain subdivision identification
signs with insufficient setback. Three of the identification
signs are on the property of the appeAlant. Two of the signs
are on c~her private property. There is one-sign on lot number
59 in MattituckEstates Subdivision~ owned by Mattituck Historical
Society. Appellant has permission from said owner to maintain
a sign on lot number 59. There is also a sign on lot number 30
in Mattituck~ Estates Subdivision, owned by Martin and Frank Sidor.
Appellant has permission from said owner to maintain a sign on
lot number 30. The Board finds that the signs in question do
not obstruct the vision for traffic and the signs are in no
way a traffic hazard. It is the opinion of the Board that it
is better to have the type of signs which the appellant is
applying for, rather than have one double face sign at the
entrance to the subdivision.
The Board finds that the pbulic convenience and welfare
and justice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use
districts will not be permanently or'substantially injured
and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by M_r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that Mattituck Estates Subdivision, Mattituck, New
York, be granted permission to retain subdivision identification
~ signs with insufficient setback at the following locations:
1) at the entrance to Cardinal Dz~e on lot number 5 in Mattituck
Estates; 2) on the property of Mattituck Historical Society, Main
Road, Mattituck, New York; 3) two signs, on the north side of New
Suffolk Avenue, at the entrance to Blossom Blvd., on,ts number
30 and 31 in MattituckEstates; 4) on the north side of New
Suffolk Avenue at the entrance to Meadow Lane on lot number 45 in
Mattituck Estates, Mattituck, New York. This permission is
granted subject to the following conditions:
Southotd Town Board of Appeals -9- September 1, 1966
1. Ail signs shall be granted for one (1) year, renewable
annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals.
2. All signs shall be subject to any subsequent changes in
the Southold Town Budding Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs.
3. Ail signs shall be located at least five ~5) feet from
any street or property line.
4. Ail signs shall be located at least three C3) feet above
ground level.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. H~lse, Mr. Grigonis.
Mr. Bergen didn't vote on the above application because of
a conflict of interest.
PUBLI~ HEARING: Appeal No. 9~9 - 8:30 P.M. (E4D, S.T.), Upon
application of George D. Damien, 924 West~End Avenue, New York
City, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, for permission to divide
property and construct a dwell~g with insufficient area. Location
of ~roperty: Main Street, Jackson Street~ Fifth Stree, New
Suffolk, New York~ bounded north by Main Street, east by Acker-
Fu~jinski, south by Jackson Street, west by Fifth Street.
Fee~id $5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affid~it attesting
to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the
applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this applicatimn?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: I might say that this lot is 150 feet by 100
fee and 150 feet by 90 feet. There is a 10 foot jog in there°
The whole lot is 300 feet by 90 feet on one end and 100 feet at
the other end. The minimum zoning requirement for a building
lot under the Zoning Ordinance is 12,500 square feet, 100 feet
of frontage. What he is planning to do here is construct three
dwellings where only two dwellings are permitted. The hardship
given is the character of the n~ighborhood. The Zoning Ordinance
does not adopt itself to ~ w~hat already exist.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- SePtember 1, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: Is Mr. Damien present:
MR. DAMIEN: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: Do you have anything to add to the application?
MR. DAMIEN: I am asking to build three buildings. I want
to build a house for myself and one for each of my children. I
may only build one house, but I want to have permission to build.
I may never build three house. I don't have the means to build
three house. I want to insure the right for my children to t~ild
houses if they want to. The existing charac~r of the neighborhood
will not be changed.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to
speak for this application?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: We are not able to correct what has already
happened. Fir. Damien, when did you buy the property in question?
MR. DAMIEN: In the begin~ng of the year.
THE CHAIRMAN: There is no hardship involved here that is
legal. The fact that the surrounding neighborhood is the way
it is, has nothing to do with the application. You bought
the property after the zoning ordinance went into effect. You
can't quote these l~nght reasons as a legal hardship. In other
words, .a lot that is too small for three houses is no hardship.
MR. DAMIEN: I just want to insure a place for my family
to live.
THE CHAIRMAN: You could build two houses there. You would
have to have 35 foot setback from Fifth Street'and Jackson Street.
At this time is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
Mr. Rudeck: I live on Jackson Street. I would like to
point out to Mr. Damien that cesspools from five house are
within 10 feet of this well. If you put three more house in
there you will be contaminating the drinking water.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else?
Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- September~, 1966
MR.' DILL: One thing that Mr. Damien must realize, that once
this happens, it could be that he would dispose of this property
within a month or within a year. We would have no controll over
what would be put on the lots. To say it would not change the
character of the surrounding area is not true. You would really
have three ~ crowed lots in that area.
MR.' DAMIEN: My wells would be on the side of Fifth Street,
and th9 cesspool on the corner of Jackson Street. I w~ld have
to ~lk to Mr. Acker and see Where is well is.
THE CHAIRMAN: A zoning use goes with the land. What you
sayyou will do with the property really does not matter.
DICK CRON~ES~.: I don't propose to direct threats to Mr.
Damien, but even if the lot has two lots, the Suffolk'County
Health Departmen~!~ requires 20,000 square feet for each lot.
THE CHAIRMAN: We would not deny two lots.
MR. I. ACKER. If we have zoning laws, why shouldn't it
be,~pheld?
THE C~IRMAN: That is why we are here. There are many
hardships and vat, rices have to be made to the Zoning Ordinance.
Is there anyone else.?
MR. DAM/RN: I am surprised by this opposition. MAs I
understand the Ordinance, according to this Section 303, I
have permission to build two house. The people are opposing
even this. I have been coming for many years to New Suffolk.
I would like to build this place.
THE CHAIRMAN: You would have to apply again to divide this
property into two lots.
Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak either
for or against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -12-
September 1, 1966
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant request permission to divide property into'
three separate building lots so that three separate ~.x~..~
dwellings may be built some time in the future. The size
of the property in question is 300 feet by 90 feet. The
property has frontage on three existing public streets. The
appellant claims ha~hip in view of the fact that the surrounding
area is built up with many homes on small parcels of land.
However, all these dwellings b~9~ existed prior to the enact-
ment of the Zoning Ordinance and can not be ~.~ww claimed a
legal hardship bythe appellant. The Board also points out
that three dwellings on this property would create a problem
With the Suffolk County Health Departmentin regards to the
wells and cesspools.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
will not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinityof this property
and in the same use district; and the variance does not observe
the spirit of the Ordinance and will change~ the character of
the district.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that George D. Damien, 924 West End Avenue, New
York City, New York, ~e denied permission to divide property
into three separate building lo~s. Property located on Main
Street, Jackson Street~ Fifth Street, New Suffolk, New York,
bounded north by Main Street, east by"Acker-Fudjinski, south by
Jackson Street, west by Fifth Street.
Vote o.f the Board: Ayes:- M_r. Gillispie~. Mr. Bergen, Mr.
Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
Om Motion by Mr. Gillispi~, seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals dated August 18, 1966, be approved as submitted.
Vote of t~Board: Ayes:- ~kr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen,
Mr. Hulse, .Mr. ~rigonis.
~ Southold Town Board of Appeals -13-
September 1, 1966
On motiun by blt. Bergen,~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVE/) that the SoutholdTown Board of Appeals set 7:50
P._Nh(EjDL~S~T~-~, Thurs4ay~ September 15, 1966, atthe Town
Office, Main Road, Southol$, New York, as the time and place
of hearing upon application of Donal H. Case, a/c Alice W. and
Henry E. Case, for recognition of-access in accordance with
the State of New York Town Law, Section 280A. Locationof
property: south side of Cedars Road and west side of New Suffolk
Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by'Cedars Road, east
by property-of applicant, south by property~of~applicant~ west
by.property ofapplicant-Peterson.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by M_r. Bergen, it was
~OLVED that the Southold Town Board ofAppeals set'8:10
P.M. (~.D.S.T.), Thursday,-September 15, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of Arnold Golz, Mattituck, New York, for
recognition of~access in accordance with the-State of New York
Town Law, Section 280A. Location of property: private rightof
way off the west s~de of Naugles Drive, Mattituck, New York,
bounded north by'L. Monro,east by'Pawlo Klymko, south by Jos.
Leogrande, west by Irma Vignes.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: K~.T.
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by~Mro Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of-Appeals set 8:28
P.M~.D.'S.T.), ThursdRya September 15, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York,.as the time and place of hearing
uponapplication of~Arch Davis, Southold, New York, for~recognition
of access in accordance with the State of New York Town Law, Section
280A. Location of p~perty: north si4e Main Ro~, Orient, New York,
bounded north by land of Berry, east by land of~Damarest~ south by'
Main Road, west by land of Berry-Ruth Young.
Vote of the Board: Ayes: RI.L
On motion by'Mr. Hulse, seconded by'Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:30
P.M.'(E.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 15, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time andplace of hearing
upon application of Lewis Serviss,-a/c Albert J. Kaul, Southold,
New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- September 1, 1966
Article III, Section 308, for permission to erect an addition to
an existing dwelling with an insufficient rear yard. Location of
property: east side Minnehaha Blvd., Southold, New York, bounded
north by'A. Harm, east by T;W.' Sheridan, ~outh by B.M. Morrisey,
west by Minnehaha Blvd.,
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board 0fAppeals set 8:40
P.M.(E.D~S.T.), Thursday, September 15, 1966, at the Town Office,.
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time andplace ofhearing,
upon application of:Walter Kapp, Esq/, a/c Peter and Lucy'Bogovic,
30-72 37th Street, Astoria, New York, for~a variance in accord-
a nce with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, Article
X, Section 1000A, for permission to divide property with
insufficient frontage and area. Location of property: east side
Founder's Path and west side Old Shipyard Lane, Southold, New
York, bounded north by H. Jacobi-A.N. Young, east by Old
Shipyard Lane, south byR. Bennett, west by Founder's Path.
VOTE of the Board: Ayes: ALL
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by'Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that 'the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:50
P.M.(E.D.S.T.'), Thursday,-September 15, 1966,~ at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time andplace of hearing
upon application of Harold R.. Reeve, Jr., a/c Frank'~owan,~Route
25, East Marion, New York, for a special exception in accordance
with the'Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300 Subsection
5 (a)~ for permission to convert an existing dwelling into a
two family dwelling. Location of property: north side Route 25,
East-Marion, New York, bounded north by'K. Ketcham, east by
Stanley Boken,' south by Route 25, west by Right of'WayS
Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL
Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- September 1, 1966
On motion b~ Mr. Bergen, seconded by'Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 9:05
P.M.'(E.D.'S.T.), Thursday, September 1~, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, mew York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of'Stanley~Corwin, Esq., a/c Nicholas Chryssiadis,
and Michael Thalassinos, East Marion, New York, for a variance
in accordance with the Zoning'Ordinance, Article X, Section'1007,
Subsection (e), for permission to construct an addition to a
n~n-conforming multiple dwelling. Location of property: east side
Rocky-Point'Road, East~Marion, New York, bounded north by"P.
Sideris, east by"E.H. King, south by'Pantelias,, west by'Rocky
Point R~t_.
Vc~ of the Board: Aye~s ALL
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:30
P.M.'(EiD.'S.T.~, Thursday, September 15, 1966, at the Town Office~
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of'William and Regina Vic~orh , Bayview Road,
Southold, New York, for a special exception in accordance with
the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10
and Article IV, Section 408, Subsection A, for permission to
retain the following signs: 1) one one premises identification
sign with insufficient setback, located on the south side of
Bayview Road, SouthOld, New York, bounded north by Bay~View
Road, east by James Bitses, south by'Corey's Creek, west by
A.' & F. Koke; 2) one directional sign on the property of'Antone
Surozenski, located on the south side of the Main Road, Southold,
New York, bounded north by Main Road, east byMike'Surozenski~ south
by Mike Surozenski, west by Mike Surozenski; 3) one directional
sign on the property of George Overton, located on the sou~h east
corner of Bay Water Road and South Harbor'Lane, Southold, ew
York, bounded north by Bay Water Road, east by'Myra Foster,~south
by-C.H. Wickham, west by South Harbor~Road; 4) one directional
and advertising sign on the property of Elizabeth Bedell, located
on the south side of Main Road, Peconic, New York, bounded north
by'Main Road, east by-.Westerlund-Skwara, south by Creek, west by
Indian Neck Lane; 5) one directional and advertising sign on the
property of Leander Glover, located on the south side of Middle
Road, Cutchogue, New York,~ bounded n~rth by Middle Road, east
by M.E. Grimm, south by'L.B. Glover, west by J. Homan.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:-ALL
$out~old Town Board of Appeals -16T
September 1, 1966
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by M_r. Bergen, it was
EESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of-Appeals set 7:30
P.M~(E.D.~SiT.), Thursday, September 22, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Sour/mid, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of'Indian Neck-Park Property Owners Association,
Peconic, New York, for a special exception in.accordance with
the Zoining Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10,
for permission to retain an area identification sign. Location
of property: east side Smith Road, Peconinc, New York, bonnded
north byIndian Neck'Lane, east by George C. Bernauer, south
by'George-C.Bernauer, west by'Smith Road.
Vote of the B~ard: AYES:
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:40
P.M. fE.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 22, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of J. Richard Holmes, Old Mill Inn, Mat~itnck,
New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, and Article
IV, Section 408~-Subsection ~), for permission to retain the
following signs: 1) one on premises sign on the building. Location
of property: -Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by
Cox Neck Lane, east byCox Neck Road, - Mattituck Creek, south by
Mattituck Holding Co., west by Mattituck Holding CO.; 2) one
directiOnal sign on the northeast corner of Cox Neck Road and
Luthers Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by J. Sledjeski;
east'by'Alberta Smith, south by'Cox Neck Road, west by Luthers
Road; 3) one directional sign on the south east corner of Mill Road
a~d Naugles Drive,.Mattituck~ New York, bounded north by Naugles
Drive, east by land of Naug~s, south by A~P. Cooke, west by Mill
Road.
Vote of the BOARD: AEES:
On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr~ Grigonis~ it-was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set'7:50
P~M.(E.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 22, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing
upon application of North Fork Oil Heat, Westphalia Road, Mattituck,
New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
Ordnance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (b), for permission
to retain a side wall sign. Location of property: west side
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-17- September 1, 1966
Westphalia Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Irma R~eve,
eastby Westphalia Road, south by Martin Sidor, westt~ George L. Penny.
~ote of the Board: Ayes: ALL
On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Apt~ls set 8:~0.
P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 22, 1966, at the Town Office
MainRoad, Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing
upon application of W.V. Duryee Est., Pike Streetand Love Lane,
Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with
the Zoning Ordinance, Az~le IV, Section 408, Subsection ~), for
permission to retain wall signs. Location of property: s~uth
east corner of Pike Street~and Love Lane, Mattituck, New York,
bounded north by'Pike Street~ east b~'Lutz and Long, south by
W.H. Drum Est., west by'Love Lane.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL
Onmotion by'Mr. Grigonis, secmnded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals ~et 8:00
P.M.'(E.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 22, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of Gradiners Bay'Estates, EastMarion, New York,
for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Section 300, Subsectionl0, for permission to reta~
area idnstification signs on the' south side of the Main Road, at
the entrance to Gardiners Bay'Estates, East Marion, New York°
Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL
~n motion by ~r. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals set8:30
P.M. (E.D.S.T.), Thursday, September 22~ 1966, at the Town Office
Main Road, Southold, ew York, as the time and place ofhearing
upon application of M~nor Grove Corp., 30-98 Crescent~Street,
Long Island City, New York, for a special exception in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section. 300, Subsection 9,
for permission to retain a subdivision sign at'Marion Manor'Subdivision
south side Main Road, East Marion, New York.
Vote of the Board~ Ayes: ALL
Southold Town Board of Appeals -18-
September 1, 1966
The Board authorized the Secretary to set'up any new
applications that came into the office up until Monday,
September 12~1966.
The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.'M.', Thursday,-SePtember 15, 1966,
at the ~0wn Office, Main Road~ Southold, New York.
The meeting was adjourned at~ 10:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara C. Dittmann, Secretary
Southold Town Board of Appeals