Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-09/22/1966 Southold Town B°ard of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. Telephone SO 5-~660 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert '0(/. Gillimi~, Jr., Chairman Robert Bergen Charles Gregoni% Jr. Serge Doyen~ Jr. Fred Huls¢, Jr. MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN Bfk%RD OF APPEALS September 22,1966 A'~egular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at'7:30 P.M., Thursday,. S~ptember 22, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, ew York. '~'~.(~r There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Giltispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen, Fred Hulse,Jr.,'-~harles Grigo~is,Jr. Absent: Mr. Serge Doyen, Jr. PUBLIC H~A..~I'G: Appeal No. 958 - 7:30 P.M.(E.D.S.T.), Upon application of Indian Neck Park'Property-Owners'Aseociation, Peconic, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain an area identification name'sign. Location of property: east side Smith Road, Peconic, New York~ bounded north .by Indian Neck Lane, east by George C. Bernauer, south by George C, Bernauer, west by'Smith Road. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman ot~e~ed the-hearing-by reading the applicatLon for a special exception, legal notice of"hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication 'in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. $outhold town Board of Appeals -2- September 22~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAn: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? FRED ARNOLD: I am here for-the association. THE CHAIN: Who's property is the sign located on? FRED ARNOLD .:.w--.--_.- ~: The sign is on George Bernauer's property. THE CHAIRMAN: We are interested in having you move the sign back five feet from the property line. MR. HULSE: The sign is too close to Indian Neck Road. FRED ARNOLD: Its on Bernauer's property. I~s not on any street. THE~CHAIRMAN: It's a questior~Sf the lot line. FRED ARNOT~: The sign is 33 feet~from the road. THE CHAIRMAN: The Sign should be moved five feetback from ~ndian Neck Road and five feetback from.~Smith Road. You can the sigh. It must be ~relocated within 60 days. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak~against this application~ ~(There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds~that the appellant~request permission to retain an area identification sign on the property of George Bernauer, located ont'he corner of Smith Road and Indian-NeckLane. The size of this ~sign is eight fee't in height by four feet in width. The Board finds that this sign is necessary to the people who live along Smith Road inregard to directing delivery.men, emergency vehicles, and frie~s Who may be visiting. The sign does not obstruct vision and is not considered a-traffic hazard. TheBoard finds that the public convenience and welfare and.._ justice will be served and the legally~established or permitted use of neighborhood ~roperty and~adjoining use districts will not be permanently-or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- September 22, 1966 On motion by M_r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was ~ES~LVED that Indian Neck Park~PropertyOwnes~ Associationt Peconic, New York, be granted permission to retain an area id~mtification sign on property 'located on the east side of Smith Road, Pe~onic, b~w York, subject, however, to the following conditions: 1. This sign is granted for one (1) year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appealso 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes the Southotd Town Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. This sign shall be located atleast five feet from Smith Road and at least five feet from Indian Neck Lane. 4. This-sign shall be l~ca~ed at least three feet above ground level. 5. This sign shall be relocated in the correct location by November22, 1966. ~ Vote of the Board:-Ayes:- bit. Gillispie, Mr~ Bergen, Fir. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 959 - 7:40 P.M.~D.S.T.), Upon application of J. Richard Holmes, Old Mill Inn, Mattituck, New York, for a special exeeption in accordance with the.Zoning Ordimance, Article III, Section 300,~Subsection 10~ and Article tV, Section 408, Subsection-~), for permission to .retain. the following signs: 1),..One on premises sign on the building. Location of P~operty: Cox Ne~k'Road, Mattituck, New. York,. bounded north by Cox'~Lane, east by"C~ Neck~Road-Mattituck Creek, south by'Mattituck HoldingCo., west by-Ma~ituck Hol'ding Co.; 2) one directi0n~ sign on the ~north east corner of Cox Neck R~ and Luthers Road, ~a'ttituck New York, bounded north by J. Sledjeski, east by Alberta S~ith, south by"Cox Neck Road, west by-Luthers Road; 3) one directiRnal sign on the south east corner of Mill Road and Naugles Drive,' attituck, New York, bounded north by Naugles Drive, east by tandmof'Naugles, south byAjP. Cooke, west by Mill Road. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing byreading the application for a special exception, legal n~tice of'hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. · ~ $outhold Town Board of Appeals -4- September 22, 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? J. RICHARD HOLMES: I speak for the application. THE C~: The application is accompanied by two letters of permission. Is there a'roof sign painted un-the building? J. RICHARD HOLMES: Yes. THE CHA~: You don~t have approval forlthat sign-. J. RICHARD HOLMES: Howard suggested that I paint~t off. THE CHAIRMAN: We would also suggest that you paint it off. You hate one sign that-we granted on CoxNeck~-Road- and M~iddle Road.~ We granted a four foot by six foot sign and~you put up a four foot by eight-foot sign, too close to the line. There was no tag on that sign and the fee hasn't been~paid fOr that sign. - J~ ~RtCHARD HOLMES: I wasn't aware of that. THE CH~: We granted a four foot by six foot sign. That is what we would like to have put-up. We would like to have it fi~e fret from.any property line. AcCording to the~Building Inspector it is two feet from the road. On the arrow that you have placed at Naugles and Mill Road, should be?~T placed'on private property. We have no authority to grant it on public property. -J.',RtCHAR~ HOLMES=-According to the owner-it is on her pr~perty~ THE-CHAIRMAN: I suggestthat you move it back. You. will have ~o find out w~ere the property line is. At t~is time is there anyone present-Who.wishes to speak against~this application? LLO~DHAM~TON: I am not.against-Mr. Hdmes having a sign, but you denied my~son-in-lawa sign. J.' RICHARD ~HOLMES :' What type of sign did he have? LLOYD HAMILTON: Fora landscaping business. $outhold Town.Board of Appeals -5- September 22, 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Theonly directional signs thatare permitted .are those th&t are in the interest of the travelling public. LLOYD HAMILTON: I understood that there would be no off premises signs. They acceptedhis money and then told him no. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Hdmes operates-a restaurant. If you are travelling,, you need to know where to ear, J, where to sleep, a~d where to worship. You need to know places of amusement. Hotels~ motels, tour-isthomes~ places that are in the interest of the travelling public. Does anyone else w~sh to speak on this application? (There was no response.) ~After investigation and inspection the Boardfinds that the appellant request permission to r~in one on premises identification sign and two off premises directional signs. The appellant owns a restaurant operation. Letters of permission from,the-property owners where the signs are located~ file in the Board of Appeals office. The Board finds that the on premises~sign on the building has been there fora number ~-of years. The directional signs are necessary to find the- Old Mill Inn which is some dis~ce-.from the Main Highway. -These signs are to be no larger than four feet by six .feet. It-is the opinion of~the Board that these directional signs are in the interest of 'the travelling public. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the-legally, established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently'or substantially injured and thespirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by~r. Bergen,' it was RESOLEED that J~ ~ichard Holmes, Old Mill Inn, Mattituck New ~ork, be granted permission to retain the followingsigss: 1) one on premises sign~ on Cox Neck Road~ Mattituck~ New York; 2) one directional sign on the north east corner of'Cox Neck Road and Luthers Road; 3) one direc~iunal sign on the south east corner or'Mill Road and Naugles Drive. These signs are granted subject to the following conditions: $outhold Town B0~rd of' Appeals -6- september 22~ 1966 1. All signs are granted for one (1) year only, renewable annualy upon written application to the Boardof'Appeals. All signs are subject-~o all subsequent changes in the Southold Town-Building Zone Ordinanceas it applies to signs. 3. The two directional signs shall be no larger than four (4) feet by six (6) feet. 4. Ail signs shall be located at least five i(5) feet from any property line or h~ghway line. 5. All signs shall be located at-least three (3) feet above ground level. 6~ Ail signs still in violation must comply with these provisions by November 22, 1966. Vote of the Board: Ayes:--Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. -PUBLIC ~RING: Appeal No. 960 - 7:50 P.M~(E~D.'S.T.~)~ Upon applicati~on of North Fork Oil Heat, We'stphalia Road, Mattituck, New York, 'for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection B, for permission to r~tain side wall signs. Lo~ation of property: ~est'side Westphalia Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded~northby Irma Reeve, east by Westphalia Road~. south by Martin Sidor, west by George L. Penny. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing,affidavit attesting. to ~s publication-in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? FRED SIEMERLING: Yes, I do. ".~MR CHAIRMAN: Would you explain why these signs are located the way they are? FRED SIEMERLING: I just replaced the big one that was on there for 35 or 45 years. All we have on the front of the building is the name of the business. People would see this sign from Route 27A, coming up Westphalia Road. Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- September 22, 1966 THE CPL~//{MAN: How far is your building from Route 27A? FRED SIEMERLING: About 150 feet, 200 feet. Something like that. THE CHAIRMAN: You feel you need this from Route 27A? MR. HULSE: You can hardly see it from there. MR. BERGEN: It shows up from Westphalia Road. TPiECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) THE CPL%IRMAN: As I understand this, the reason for the location of these signs on the side of the building is if you had a ground s ign it would be pratically invisible by trees and shrubs, and there would be no place to locate it. In this case we agree to grant a wall sign in lieu of a ground sign. Is the~e anything further'on this application? (There.was no response.) After investigation and inspectionthe Board finds the Sp~-~ appellant request permission to retain side wall signs in lieu of a ground sign. The building is located close to the road and it would be almost impossible to erect'a ground sign an~.~ave it visible. The sign, loca~d on the~north side of the building is 32 inches high and 15 feet long and reads: North Fork'Oil Heat, Plumbing and Heating~ Fuel Oil Deliveries. This sign advises people to the north on Route 27 of the existance of this business. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and_justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neigh'borhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the' spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by'Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that North Fork Oil Heat, Westphalia Road~ Mattituck New York, be granted permission to retain a wall sign on the north wall of the building on premises located on the west side 0d Westphalia Road~ Mattituck, New York subject to the following ' conditions: Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- September 22, 1966 1. This sign shall be granted for one ~) year only~ renewalb~ annuallyupon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The appellant agrees not to erect a standing ground sign of any type at this pren~es. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mro Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 961 - 8:00 P.M~.D.'S.T.), Upon application of Gardiners Bay-Estates, East Marion, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III~'Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to r~tain area identification signs on the south side of MainRoad, at the entrance to Gardiners Bay'Estates, East Marion, New York. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication, in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. T~E CHAIRMA~: Is there~anyone preset who wishes to speak- for this application? FRANK THORP: We had these signs for about 40 years. Its not advertising anything. We have about 75 cottages in this developemnet and a great many people have visitors come done. If we don~t have a sign, they don't know where to find them. THE CHAIRMAN: We agree that you need a sign. Do you think that you need two signs? FRANK THORP: I think if you have e~er been down there Here's the road in the middle and the signs on each fence. THE CHAIRMAN: They should be cut down to four feet by six feet~ or 24 square feet. FRANK THORP: We need the lenght, notthe height. THE CHAIRMAn: Anything is okay as long as they do not exceed 24 square feet. $outhold 'Town Board 'of Appeals -9- September 22~ 1966 TP!E CHAIRMAN: This Orchard Lanesign~ you say it is 20 feet from the 'concrete~ iL that correct? FRANK THORP: It is 30 feet from the edge or, the concrete on the State R~. THE CPL~IRMAN: I can't"~isulize the location of the~hird sign. MR.'PK/LSE: It is down by Jimmy Rogers. THE CHAIRMAN: Whose property is t~at on? FRANK THORP: It is on the right of way. THE~CHAIRMAN: Who owns the right of way? FRANK THORP: It is a right of way to our property. THE CHAIRFi~N: How wide is the tight'of way~ ~We prefer not-to have these signs on the right of way. FRANK'THORP: The man has a wire fence along the edge of his property. -'-THE CHAIRMAN: The sign is up against the fence? -~RANK'THORP: It is about one foot from the fence. THE CPL%IRMAN: How wide is the right of way? FRAN~ TH~RP: I think it is 20 feet~ but I am not'sure of that. THE CPL~IRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? {There was no response.~ Southo!d Town Board of'Appeals -10- September 22~ 1966 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant requestpermission to retain area ~_identification signs. These signs are to identify the subdivision Gardiners Bay Estates. The existing.signs are larger than permitted and must be reduced in size not to exceed 24 square feet. The Board points out that these signs are essential to the people living in Gardiners Bay'Estates. These signs do not obstruct vision and are not-considered a traffic hazard. ~T~_e Board finds that the public convenience and weIfare a1~ justice will be served and the legaIly established or permitted use of neighborhood prgperty and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillis~ie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Gardiners Bay'Estates, East Marion, New York be granted permission to retain area identification signs on the south side of the Main Road at the entr~c~ to Gardiners Bay Estates, subject to the following conditions: 1. The signs are graZr~e'd~for one (1) yearonly, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The signs are subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Building Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The signs shall be located at least five (5) feet from any property line.or highway line. 4. The signs shall be located at least three (3) feet~above ground level. 5. The signs shall be reduced in size to a maximum of 2~ square feet. -6. The signs shall comply with the above provisions by November 22, 1966. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -ll- September 22, 1966 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 962 - 8:10 P.M.'~E.D.S.T.), Upon application of W.'V, DuryeeEst., Pike Street~and Love Lane, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception~in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section408, Subsection ~), for permission to retain wall signs. · Location of property: south east corner of Pike Street and Love Lane, Mattituck~ New York, bounded north by'Pike Street, east by Lutz.and~Long, south by W.H. Drum Est., west by'Love Lane. Fee paid $5.00 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the.official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of..this application? JOHN'DURYEE: At the present this is-the only'sign we have. It is on the east wall. How about the sign over'the sidewalk, does that ha~e to come down? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes sir. JOHN'DURYEE: Every one is to come down? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. JOHN DURYEE: Can you have it over your own property? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes, provided it does not extend more than twelve.inches from the building. JOHN'DURYEE: I would like to have the sign that's over there. THE CHA~: The sign that'overhangs the sidewalk we can't give.you permission for. We'can~t grant something that overhangs State property. JOHN'DURYEE= If I move the sign on the east wall tothe north wall do I have to get a permit? THE CHAIRMAN: You.have a sign up as high as the second story level on the building. JOHN'DURYEE: I have no sign on the front of the building. I kaye a sign on the east wall that faces the empty lot that faces UtE. Southold Town Board of Appes~s -12- September 22~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: You are permitted one wall sign and one ground sign on business property. In this case it isn't feasible to put up a ground sign, so we mkke a compromise. Do you want to cut out that4~ x 8' sign way up high? JOHN-DURYEE: I have at least 50~.feet_on both streets. I would like to move the east wall Sign'to the north wall and ~ut another sign on the south'wall. One sign facing'$ove Lane and one on P/k~'Street. At present'I would l~-to keep it as'it is. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against 'tb~ application? ~(There was no response. ) After investigation and inspection theBoard finds that the appellant-request permission to retain a wall sign on the e~stwall of his building. The building is located on a corner of two streets, Pike Street and Love' Lane. The Board finds that~the sign on the east wall or-'the building faces an empty lot. The Board points out that the appellant does not have'the necessary area to erect a ground sign and the side wall sign requested is in lieu of a ground sign. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use distri~ts'wiI1 not be permanently or substanti&lly injured andthe spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that W.V% Duryee Est., Pike Street and Love Lane~ Mattituck, New York~ be granted permission to retain a wall sign on 'the east wall or-the building located on the south east corner 0fPike Street and LoveLane,Mattituck, New York, subject to the-following conditions: 1. This sign shall be granted for one (1) year only, renewable annually upon written-application to the Board of Appeals. 2. This sign.shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the $outhold Town Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The appellant agrees that no ground.sign of any type will be erected at this premises. Vo~of the Board: Ayes:-Mr. Gillispie, Mr.~Bergen, Fir. Hulse, ~ /~r~G~i~onis Southotd Town Board of'Appeals- -13- September 22,1966 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 8:30 P.M.'(EoD. S~T.), Upon application of Manor GroveCorp., 30-98 Crescent Street, Long Island City, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, SubsectiDn 9, for'permission to retain a subdivision sign at-Marion Manor Subdivision, south side_Main R~,-EastMarion, New York. Fee paid $5.00. The~Chairman opened~e hearing byrea'ding the application for a special exception, legal notice or'hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the~applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this-application? !(Edna Brown-was present but'had nothing further~to add to ~e application.) THE CHAIRMAN: There are some "for sale" signs in this subdivision that must be set back at least 35 feet on thelot. The ~~'existing sign at the' entrance should be reduce to four feet'by six feet, single or double face, set'back five feet'-~from~Lny property line. EDNA BROWN: Can it still say the same thing on it~ THE CHAIRMAN: Yes. Is there anyone present who wishesto spemk against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant request~permission to retain a subdivision identification, sign. The signidentifies Marion Manor, located in Ea~st'Marion. Thesign is presently oversized and must be~ reducedin size not to exceed 24 square feet. The~appellant- is the owner of the prOPerty Where the sign islo~ated. The Board finds that the sign-has been in the same located for 14 years. It is the opinion of the Beard that this sign does not obstruct vieion and is not considered ~ traffic hazard. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property'and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. Southold Town Board of Appeals ~14- September 22, 1966 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded ~y Mr~ Bergen,~. it was RESOLVED that Manor Grove.Corp., 30-98 Crescent'street, Long Island City~ New York, be~grahted permission to retain an area subdivision identifi~ation sign on property located on the south side of'Main Road, East' Marion, New York , subject to the follOWing conditions: ~ 1. This sign shall be granted for one (1) year only,-renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject'to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinanceas it appIies to signs. 3. This sigh Shall be loCated at least five (5) feet from any property line or highway line. 4. This sign shall be located at least three (3) feet above ground level. 5~ This sign shall be reduced in size not to exceed a~.maximum of 24-square feet. 6i This sign shall compl~ with the above provisions by November. 22, 1966. Vote of. the Board: Ayes] - Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Hulse, ~Mr. Grigonis. ~)UBLICi~R;~P~NG: Appeal'~o. 964 - 8:45P.'M,'i(E.~D-'S'TJ), Upon application ofJosephKrukowski, MainRoad, Southol~$,~'~iNe~ York, for a special exception in accordance with the' Zonin~ Ordinance, -Article III; SeCtion 300,~Subsection 10, for permission to retain a wall sign. Location~ of property: south 'side Main Road, Southold~ New York, bounded north by Main Road, east byBeixedon Estates, south by Beixedon Estates, west by J~T. OVerton. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, 'legal notice or,earing, affidavit attest- ing to its publication in the official newspaper and notice to the applicant. Sout~old Town Board of Appeals -15- September 22,1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who ~ishes to speak for this application? (There was no response. ) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against, this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: This sign is applied for by the owner of the barn. .There have been several typesi of signs on there. Just at the present.there is a SilverSands Motel sign there. MR.' BERGEN: Is this sign a directional sign now? MR. HULSE: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: This application has got to be limited ~ the type of sign to be placed on the barn.~ I am not sure ¢~f the size of the sign but it can not be over the present lin it Is there anything furtheron this sign? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds thLt the appellant request permission to retain a sign on the w~Lll of his barn. This sign is presently used by'Silver Sands ~[otel for a directional sign. The sign has been in existance fo3 many years, however, there~a~e been different use~ for .the sign. ~In order for t~his sign to continue the sign must be used only-for directional purpose~ for those types of business that ar.e 'in the interest of. the travellingDublic. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. So~thold Town Board of Appeals -16-- September 22,~ ,1966 On motion by bit.. Gillispie,~ seconded by Fir. Hulse,it-was RESOLVED that Joseph' Kurkowski, Main Road, Southold, New York, be granted permission to retain a wall sign on property located on the south side of the Main Road, Southold, New York, subject, however, to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be granted for one (1) year only~ renewable annually.upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent-Changes in the Southold To~4n Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. This sign shall be no larger than four (4) feet by six (6) feet, or 24 square feet. ' 4. This sign shall be used only~for directional purpose~ for those tl~s of business that are in the interest of the taavelling~pub~ic. ~. tt will be necessary when the advertiser is changed to make a new application to the Board of Appeals for the location of the~new sign° 6. -In the event-the signlis oversize, it must comply with provision number'3 above by Novelmber 22, 1966. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-bir. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC-HEARING: Appeal N~. 965 - 8~5 P.M. (E~D~S.To)., Upon application ofCutchog~e'Diner, Inc.,-Main R~ad, Cutchogue,. New York, for aspecial exception in accordance with the'Zoning Ord!nance,-Article IV,.Section 408,-Subsection (a)~, for per mission to retain~.a ground sig~With insufficient setback. Location of proper, ty~?.south Side-Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, boundednorth by,Main Road, east by F~J'Kaelin, south byR. C.'. Church-Baker, west'by'RjC.' Parish'Hall~~' .Fee paid $5.00. Southold Town Board or'Appeals -1'7, September '22, 1966 The Chairman opened the hearing byreading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is 'there anyone present who~ishes to speak in favor of this application? WTT.LIAM HAGAN: I do. THE CHAIRMAN: How far back from the prpperty line is this sign? WT?~L/~AMHAGAN: The diner sits back about 3½ feet from the property line. The sign sets back'about the depth of the small garden kept in front of the diner. a THE CHAIRMAN: It is illegal to have/sign over ~ the sidewalk. William HAGEN: On this particular sign, cmming around the bend from the west you can't see it at all. If I turned it around it would be better. THE CHAIRMAN: We would suggest that you turn the top part of the sign around. is there anyone presentwho wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant request permission to retain a g~nd sign with insufficient setback from the State property line . The sign is on a wooden post presently projecting over the s~dewalk. The size of the sign is four feet by twenty-two inches. The sign reads "diner". If the appellant turns the t6p part'of the sign around, no part of thesign will be projecting over State property. The Board finds that this sign is essential to the appellant's business and is in the interest of the travelling public. The Board finds that the public conveneince and welfare add justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property-and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. Southold Town Board of Appeals~ -18- September 22,~ 1966 On motion by'Fir. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it~was RESOAVED that~Cutchogue Diner, Inc, MainRoad, Cutchogue, New-Yorkw be granted permission to retain a ground sign with insufficient setback onproperty located on the south side of the MainRoad, Cutchogue, New York~ subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be granted for one .El) year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance as it:applies to signs." 3. This sign shall be turned~ around so that the top portion of the sign does not ~v~w~ overhang State property. The sign must be turned around by November 22, 1966. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie,F~. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC P~RING: Appeal No. 966 - 9:10 P.M.:(E.D.-S,T.'), Upon appliCation .ofKatz Children Store, 210-214 Main Street, Green- port, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 4082 Subsection (~), for permission-to retain an off premises advertising sign. Location~ of property: south side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded northby~Main Road east by Herman Sill, south by'Herman Sill~ west by'C. Ryan. Fee paid $5.00. The'Chairman opened the 'hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in theofficial newspDper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? SAMUEL KATZ: As I mentioned before the special hearing, it advertises my children's shop which handles children ~-k~clothes and disposable diapers~ w~ieh is very'necessary 'to any tourist that travels this area. They look for a children's shop that sells disposable diapers. They come into my~shop every summer and the winter too, for disposable diapers. It is a matterof great necessity to have these diapers. They are much too large to cart along in the care for a summer trip. I sold them this $outhold Town Board of Appeals -19- September 22, 1966 summer with unbelievable quanity and all to tourist. THE CH~: To your way or, thinking that sounds logical. To our way of thinking it does not. SAMUEL E~TZ: I put this sign up for the first time for civic pride. If you drive into a ~ town and don't see any signs it reflects a lack of commercial aptitude,. Greenport has great civic pride. Tourist coming into ~reenport, dont seen signs, this shows a low grade of commercial enterprise. This directs quite a few PeOPle for baby needs which are imperative to tourist. They buy these disposable diapers and the they will ask for a place to eat. I fe~that now that you heard this particular part of my story you are really'aware of the importance of disposal diapers. This is not a large sign. THE CHAIRMAN: It is not'a question of the size of the sign. It is a question of the purpose of the sig~ SAMUEL KATZ: I had the first sign at the golf course. I would apprecia~ it if you would give alot of consideration to ~-~u~what have said. MR. BERGEN: There is no provision advertise this. in the Ordinance to THE CHAIRMAN: Others aren't allowed to put up this type of sign. SAMUEL KATZ: You would be creating a hardship by denying me. · he fact that others don't want to put up a road sign should not disqualify me. THE CHAIRMAN: You were given five years to liquidate yoursign. SAMUEL KATZ: It isn't a question of getting hurt. I need the sign to continue the degree of propriety in the business .area in our to~n. THE CHAIRMAN: 'You have faoili~in the Village of Greenport~o~ ~$~ SAMUEL E~TZ: ~re you considering the fact that its importa~ to people travelling with babies. THE CHAIRMA~: You need fo~ight to travel with babies. Is there anything further to be said on-this sign? .(There was no response.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- September 22~ 1966 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (-There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant request permission to retain an off premises advertising and directional sign. The sign advertises and directs to the appellant's children shop business located in the Village of Green- port. The Board points out-there are ne provisions in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance for the type of ~ign requested by the appellant. The o~ly types of off premises directional .signs per- mitted are those in the interest offthe travelling public, such as, hotels, motels, tourist-homes, restaurants, marinas, places of amusement and places of worship. It is the opinion of~the Board of-Appeals that the appellant~s sign im not in the interest of the travelling public. It is the Board's 'contention that people looking for a children shop should go into the business area of the town. If this sign was granted to the appellant, he wou~d be granted a ~ privilege denied to all other merchants with the same classification of business. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will not be served and the legally'established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will be permanentlyor substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will not be observed. On.motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, 'Lt was RESOLVED Samuel Katz, KatzChildren~Store, 210-214 Main Street, Greenport, New York~ be de~ied permission toretain an off premises advertising and directional sign onproperty located on the south side MainRoad, Greenport, New York. This sign must be removedfrom the Premises by'Noven~er 22, 1966. Vote of the Board: Ayes:---Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- September 22, 1966 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 967 - 9:30 P..M.'~E.'D~S,T.), Upon application of Myra Sawyer, Sigsbee Road, Mattituck, New Yomk, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III, Sdction 303, and Article-X, Section 1000A, forpermission to divide property with insufficient frontage and area. Location of property: lot number 111 in Mattituck Park~Properties, Inc. Subdivision, Mattituck, ~New York. Fee paid $5.00 The Ch~airman opened the hearing by reading the application ~var~ance.. for a ~. .... ~k~ .~, legal notice ofhearing, affidavit attesting to its publ~ation in the official newspaper~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone preset who wishes to speak in favorof this application~ JOHN'McNULTY, ESQ.: I appear.on behalf of the petitioner. The pertinent facts are stated in the application~ I would be glad to answer any questions. MR. HULSE: How big is the parcel of land? JOHN McNULT~ESQ.': I'believe each lot'has-50 feet frontage. THE CHAIRMAN: Both of these houses have been occupied continuously. No new properties are being .created. What are the side yards on this? MR.' BERGEN: Side yards, I would say on the north side of the first house is approximately ~2 feet. Between the two house I would say 16 feet. THE CHAIRMAN: There can be no exterior alterations to the houses. JOHN McNULTY, ESQ.:. There will be no additions to the ho~es. THE CHAIRMAN: How deep are these lots? MR. BERGEN: The lots are about 100 feet deep. THE CH~.~: How far from the road are the houses set back? MR. BERGEN: About fifteen to eighteen feet. THE CHA~: Are there any other questions (There w~s no response.) Southold Town Board ofAppeals s -22- September 22,1966 ~ I ~~: IS there anyone present-who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellantrequest permission to divide property ~eaving two lots with insufficient frontage and area. There is a house erected on each lot to be created. Both of the houses were erected on the lots prior to the adoption of the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance. The lots were laid~ out in 50 foot lots on a filed map prior to the adoption ofthe Zoning Ordinance. The character of the neighborhood will not be changed because there will be no physical change in either the lots or the houses to be set off. It is the opinion of the Board that it would be a ~-£~-~ definite hardship to deny the division of this property. The Board finds that striCt application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and wQuld not be shared by all properti~a alike in the immediate vicinity~of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observed the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character-of the dist~t. On ~ by Mr. Bergen,seconded by blt. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED Myra Sawyer, Sigsbee Road, Mattituck, New York~ be granted permission to divide property with insufficient frontage andarea. Location of property: lotnumber 111 in Mat~ituck Park'Properties, Inc., Mattituck, New York, subject to the following conditions: 1. There will be no exterior alterations on either house located on the lots created. Vote of the Board~ Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Fir. Bergen, Fir. Hulse~.Mr. Grigonis. 96 68 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal Noo/9:45 P.'M~.(E.~D.S~T~), Upon application of Harold R. Reeve and Sons~ Inc., Mattituck~ New York, for Southold Savings Bank, Main Road, SoUthold, New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, aArticle Iv, Section 408, Subsection ~a)~ for permission to erect ground Signs. Location of property: north west~corner of Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded north by Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- September 22, 1966 ~. Terp, east~by Youngs~Avenue, south by Main Road, west by E. Prince. Fee paid $5.00 The Chairman opened~ehearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attestingto its publication in the official newspaper, and n~bice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? (There was no response.) The Chairman read from the building sign permit application the size~ location and wording of each of the t~ree signs to be erected. It was the opinion of the Board that the "Exit" sign should rea~ "Right turn only" in order to prevent traffic jams. THE CP~%/~_~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak againstth~s application? i(There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant' request permission to erect three ground signs. These w~ll be infon~ational signs located at the Southold Savings Bank. Sign A will read~"Drive-up Entrance", located on Youngs ~venue, at the driveway leading to the.~drive-up window. Size of Sign A is three feet four inches long by one foot~inine inches high.~ Sign B will read "Entrance", located on Youngs~AVenue at the entrance to the parking lot. It is pointed out that this entrance is separate from the drive up window entrance. Size of sign is three feet four inches long by.one foot high. Sign. C will read "Exit"~ located on the Main Road at the combined exit for~parking lotr and drive up window. The Board points out-that on the reverse-side of the "Exit" sign should appear the words "Turn Right'Only". This will prevent traffic jams at the traffic light at the intersection of the Main Road and Youngs Avenue. It is the opinion or-the Board that the above s~gns are necessary for the operation of the drive up window at the bank. Southold TOwn Board of Appeals -24- September 22, 1966 The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighbbrhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by'bir,,~ Gillispie, seconded by'bLt. Hulse, it was RESOLV~ that Harold R. Reeve and Sons, Inc., Mattituck, New York, a/c Southold Sav~ngs Bank, Main Road, SouthOld, Ne~ York, be granted permission to erect three ground signs. Location of property: north west corner of Main Road and Youngs Avenue, Southold, New York, This permission is granted ~ subject to the following conditions: 1. All three signs are granted for one year, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2.' Ail three signs shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to Signs. 3. Ail three signs shall be erected at least three (3) feet from any property line or highway line. 4. ~11 three signs shall be erected at least 'three (3) feet above ground ~vel. 5. The "Exit" sign shall read "Turn RighttOnly" on the reverse side. Vote of ~the Board: Ayes: - Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse~ Mr4 Grigonis. The C~airman reopened the hearing onAppeal No. 954, upon application of~Walter Kapp~ Esq., a/c'Peter and L~cyBogovic, 30-72 37th Street, Ast'oria, New York, for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section'303, Article X,-Sectinn 1000A, for Permissionto divide property.with insufficient frontage and area. Loc a'tio~of property: east side'Founder's Path and west side Old Shipya'~d Lane, Southold, New York, bounded north by H. Jacobi~A,N. Young, east by Old Shipyard Lane, south by R. Bennett~ west by Fomnders Path. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -25- September 22, 1966 TPE CHAIRMAN: Is the~e anyone present who wishes to add anything to this application? ARNOLD LARSEN: I have a map from the water department that shows where the water is and where it goes in the respective lots adjacent to the lots in question. THE CHAIRMAN: This indicate~ that water comes down as far as Young. AP~OLD LARSEN: '~ointing to mapI They will either b~g it fr~ here into here or. will get a right of way'though this lot. THE CHAIRMAN: Any one else wish to speak for this application? ARNOLD LARSEN: There was not a certainty as to when the two parcels were purchased. One was in 1948 and the other one in 1955. Both of which was prior to the Zoning Ordinance. THE CHAIRMAN: My investigation indicatedthat the original map of Founders Estates, made a part of the'Zoning Ordinance, what the Town Board approved as a small part cf the Zoning Ordinance, one this lot showed as -~ lot. This lot was a single lot on the original map, just as the map shown to me. The two parcels were bought'at sepa~e times. ARNOLD LARSEN: I would like to show you the map that I think was accepted by the Town Board. THE CHA/~MAN: I spoke to the building inspedor and the Supervisor and the both told me it was a single lot. ARNOLD LARSEN: ThSs shows the dimensions of the existing lot and it shows the building. THE CHAIRMAN: I accept the Building Inspector's and the Supervisor"s word that it was a single lot~when zoning went in. Is there anything further either for or against this application~ (There was no response. ) Southold Town Board of'Appeals -26- September 22, 1966 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant request permission to divide property'and create two undersizedlots. This property is located in Founders Estates, Southold. The Board finds that the original map of Founders Estates was filed in approximately 1928 in the County'Clerk's Office, and was made part of the Zoning Ordinance. The Town approved the original map. This lot was a single lot on the original map of Founders Estates, altho it was divided after the original map was filed, and then repurchased by the same owner prior to 1957. The division of this property, which is substantially larger than other lots in the block, would result in one lot more than twenty per cent (20%) smaller-than adjacent lots on Founders Path; and one lot five per cent' C5%) smaller than adjacent lots on Old Shipyard Lane. The Board points out that the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 12,500 square feet of land area per family'unit. Current difficulties in the Town relating to water and sewage are also considerations which are unfavorable to this application. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will not prOduce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared byall properties alike in the immediate vicinity of'this property and in the same use district; and the variance does notobserve the spirit ofthe Ordinance and will change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by M_r. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that-Walter Ka~p, Esq., a/c Peter and Lucy Bogovic, 30-72 37th Street., Astoria, ew York, be denied permission to divide property with insufficient frontage and area. Location of property: east'side Founder's Path and west side Old Shipyard Lane, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board~ Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grignonis. The-Chairman reopened the hearing on Appeal no. 956, upon application of Stanley'Corwin, Esq., a/c Nicholas Chryssiadis and Michael Thalassinos, East Marion, New York, for a variance in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 1007, Subsection (e), for permission to construct an addition to a non-conforming multiple dwelling. Location of property: east side Rocky Point Road, East Marion, New York, bounded north by P. Sideris, east by E.H. King, south by Pantelias, west'by Rocky Point ~oad. $outhold Town Board of Appeals September 22, 1966 THECHAIRMAN: Es there anyone present who has anything to add to this application? (There was no response.) ~ECHAIRMAN: Es there anyone present who wishes to say anything further against this application? Mr~ Slocum, do you wish to add'anything? NRNNETH SLOCUM,ES~.: t have nothing to add. THE CHAIRMAN: There was no registration underthe Multiple Housing act of 1952. The present structure met the requirements of the Multiple Residence Law. The non-conforming use was ns stated on the original map. It was a multiple residence consisting of three apartments. The existance of this building existed .~z~ prior to the passing of the Ordinance. It was constructed about 1954 or 1955. This is the third change of ok~rship. The overall size of the building is 24 feet'by'24 feet. The minimum requirementper unit is 850 square feet. The minimum lot area is 12,500 square feet per unit. The lot area here is~ 16~800 square feet. Less than half the minimum requiredper unit. The applicant~ as pointed out byMr. Slocum, has ignored efforts by 'the Building Inspector to fill out the necessary fDrms required by the Multiple Residence Law. It would be undesirable to expand this non-conforming use, and accordingly my recomm~dation is 'that this application be denied. Are there any other questions? (There was no respors e. $ After investigation and inspectionzu~t~e Board finds that the appellant request permission to expand an existing non-conforming use. The non-conforming use in q~estion is a multiple residence, containing three apartment units. The Board finds that there was no registration of this multiple residence under the Multiple ~ousing Act of 1952. However, the building would have met the minimum requirements. This use was a non-conforming use not noted on the original zoning map. Existance of building and use however, existed prior to the passage of the Ordinance in 1957. The building was constructed in 1954.or 1955. This is the third change of. ownership. The Board finds that the overall size of the Southold T~n Board of Appeals -28- September 22, 1966 building is 24 feet by 24 feet'or 1056 square feet. The present minimum requirement per family unit is 850 square feet. The minimum lot area required is 12,500 square feet per family unit. The size of the property in question is 16,800 square feet. This is less than half the minimum required per unit. It~was pointed out at the public hearing that all other homes in this immediate vicinity are one family dwellings. Therefore, it would notbe in keep~ing with the spirit of the Ordinance to permit the expansion of this non-conforming multiple residence. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will not produce practica~ difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is~u~ique and would be shared by~aI1 properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this. ~perty and in the same use district; and the variance does~serve the spirit of the Ordinance and will change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVEDthat~Stanley Corwin, Esq, a/c Nicholas Chryssiadis and Michael Thalassinos, East-Marion, New York, be denied permission to construct an addition to a non-conforming multipleresidence located on the East side of Rocky Point-Toad, East Marion, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by F~r. Bergen, it was RESOAVED'that'the Southold Town Board of APpeals set 7:30 P.M.', ~.D.'S. Ti~), Thursday, October 6, 1966, at the Town Office~ Main Road, Southold, New York~ as the time and'place ofhearing-upon application of Sterling Harbor~Shipyard~ Inc., Manhanset~Avenue Greenport~ New York, for a variance in accordancewith the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV,-Section 404 or 405 for permission to construct a boat storage buildin~ With insufficient setback frOm the proper~ line. Location of property: west sideManhanset~Avenue- Greenpor New York~ bounded north byCreek, east by Manhanset~A~enue, south by St.~ Agnes Cemetery, west by Corp.-Line- Vo~e of the Board: Ayes: _ALL Southold Town Board or,Appeals -29- September ~22, 1966 On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen~ it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:40 P.M. (P~'DjS~T.), Thursday,~~~Y~ October 6, 1966, atthe Town Office, MainRoad, So~thold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of'Walter Kessler, Maple Lane, Mattituck, New York, a/c Wilfred and Anna CorWin, Pacific Street, Mattituck, New York, for a variance in a'ccordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, SubSection 6, for permission to construct a garage with insufficient setback from the property line. Location of property: south east corner of Center Street and Marratooka Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north byCenter Street~ east by Walter Gaver, south byW. Corwin, west by Marratooka Lane. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL motion by M_r. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Boardcf Appeal s set 7:50 P.M.~(E.D.S.T.)~ Thursday, October 6, 1966, at-the Town Office, Main'Road, Southold, New York~ a.s the time and place of hearing upon application of Joseph Diaz, Greenport~ New York, a/c Rudolph Wingerter, Bay'Avenue, East Marion, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300~ Subsection 6, for permission to construct an accessory building in the side yard area. Location of property: west side Bay'Aven~e, East Marion, New York, bounded north by J~ Miskalis, east by Bay'Avenue, south by P. Karas, west by R.C.~ Dean. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL On motion by Mr. GillisI~s, 'seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the-Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:00 P.M~(E.D~S.'T.), Thursday, ~ October 6~ 1966, at the Town Office~ Main Road, Southol~, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Floyd F. King~ Jr., 525 King Street, Orient, New York~ for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to divide property with'insufficient area. Location of property: south eastcorner of Fletcher Street and Village Lane, Oreint, New York, bounded north by Fletcher Street, east and south by Margaret E. Henriksen, west by Village Lane. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Southold Town Board of Appeals -30- September 22, 1966 On motion by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it~was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 8:'10 P.M.~&D~'S,Ti-), Thursday~ October 6, 1966, at theTown Office, Main Road, Southold, New York~ as ~the time and place of hearing upon application of Gordon K. ahlers, Manor'Lane, Jamesport, New York, a/c Joseph R.~ Cabaret, 860 W. Main Street, Riverhead, New York, for a speGial exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, A~ticle lII, Section 300., Subsection (b)~ for permission to construct a two family dwelling. Location of ProPerty: west side Old Jule Lane, Mattituck, New York, bounded north byVan Dusen, east by'Ole Jule Lane, south by'Semmerling, west by Peconic Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:25 P.M.~.D.S.T.),Thursday, October 6, 1966, at-the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of~hearing upon application of Allen S. Dowe, Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, New York, for a variance in accordance with 'the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Sdction 307, for permission to construct an addition with insufficient side yard area. Location of property:~lot number. 1'1 ~nd three .feet of lot' number 12, in Edgemere Park~Sub~ division, aurel, new York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:40 P.M. (E.D.S.~T.), Thursday, October 6, 1966~ at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place, or'hearing upon application or,Crescent Beach Motel, Inc., North Road, East Marion, New York, for.a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsectionl0, for permission to retain the following signs: 1) one di'rectional~sign on the property of Dawn Estates Builders Corp., located on the south side of ~e Not.th Road,~ East Marion, New York-, bounded north~by North oad, east by,Maple Lane, south by'Dawn Estates Builders Corp., West by John Ricapito and Chas. King; 2) one directional sign on the pro- perty of A. Straussner, located on the north side of Main Road, Traffic Circle, Greenport, New ~ork~ bounded north by Joseph Brandi, east by Sound Avenue, south by ain Road, west by A.~ Straussner; 3) one directional sign on the-p~operty of'Steve Doroski, located on the south side of N~h Road, Southodl, New York, bounded north by Southold TOWn Board of Appeals September 22, 1966 North Road, east by Bowery Lane, south by Railroad, west by Gerald Case. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that the Southold ToTn Board of Appeals set 9:00 P.M..~.D.S.T.), Thurs~ay~ October 6, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, ew York, as the time and place of h~aring upon application of-V~il Bros. t Inc., Main Road Peconic, Dew York for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article ~V, Section 408, Subsection (~), for permission to erect a ground sign that exceeds the maximum h~ght permitted. Location of ~roptery: north east corner of Main Road and Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York, bounded north by'L. Gozelski, east by'L. Gozelski, south by main Road, west by Peconic Lane. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by M~. Hulse, it was RESOLV~ that the $outhold Town Board of'Appeals set 9:10 P.'M.(E.D. SjT), ~hursday, October 6, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New°York, as the time and place ofhearing ~ upon application of Bernard Kaplan, 220 EdgewOod Avenue, Smith- town, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300~ Subsection 9, for per- mission to retain a subdivision identificationm~k~ sign. Location of property$ south side North Road, East Marion~ New York, bounded north by'North Road, east by Maple Lane, south by Dawn Estates Builders Corp., west by John Recapito and Chas. King. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Ail The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 P.~M. Eespect fully submitted, /~_~ \ Ix' '/%-'e . ~ South~ld Town Board of Appeals