HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-11/03/1966 ..... £App
' Southold Town Board o eals
-~OUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y.
Telephone $0 5-2660
APPEAL BOARD
MEMBERS
Robert ~(/. Gillispie, Jr., CMJrm~n
Robert: BerBen
Charles Gregonis, Jr.
Serge Doyen, Jr.
Fred Hulse, Jr.
MINUTES
$OUTHOLD TOWN BOARD QF APPEALS
November 3, 1966
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals
was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, November 3, 1966, at the
Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York.
There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr.~
Chaimman; Robert'Bergen, Fred Hulse, Jr., Charles Grigonis, Jr.
Absent: Mr.- Serge Doyen, Jr.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 984 - 7:30 P~M.:(E~S.T.), Upon
application of G. Harvey Moore, Kirby Lane, Ja~esport~ New
York, for approval of access in accordance with the State of
New York Town Law, Section 280A. Location of property: south
side Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel, New York, bounded north by
Peconic Bay Blvd., east-by property now or formerly of Harry
Young, west by land now or formerly of J. Cardinal, south by
Peconic Bay. Fee paid(S5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for approval of access, legal notice ofhearing, affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to the appellant.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- November 3, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
in favor of this application?
(~fhere was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
in opposition to this application?
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: Yes, I speak against the application.
I am the owner of the property immediately adjoining on the east.
THE CHAIRMAN: I understand from a telephone call from A1
Crabtree that you are also speaking for-him.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: That is correct. I also speak for
Fir. Cardinal.
THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Cardinal owns the property to the west2
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: Mr. Cardinal has property immediately
to the west, extending from the road to- the bay. I challenge
the original application of August 18. I wish to challenge the
legal~tyof this notice. I did not'recognize this hearing
n~kic~ in the paper as I read it because of my name not appearing
andit has been on record for 18 years.
THE CHAIRMAN: I owned a farm in Orient for 15 or 18 years
and it was always referred to under the former owner's name.
MR. HULSE: This description was taken off the sur~eymade.
The propertywas now or formerly of Harry Young.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: The property has been in my name for
twenty years. Also~ Mr. Cardinal's first initial is A. not J.
It appeared that way on the first notice and appeared the same
on this one. It would have been very easy for me-to come here
in August. I was not aware of the hearing, even though I
subscripe to the MattituckWatchman.
THECPL%!RMAN: Your objection then, is based.on improper
notice in the official newspaper.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: That is correct.
THE~CHAIRMAN: Anyone can make an application ~D this Board
if they have a substantial interest in the property.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE~ The owmers name did not appear. It could
ha~e re~d John Doe ~nd .I would_not haverec°gnized it.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-3-
November 3, 1966
THE CH~: We often have builders appear on behalf of
the owner. In this case ~arvey Moore is acting for himself, and
he has an interest in the property.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: i was not aware of it.
THE CHAIRMAN: There is no requirement in the Zoning Ordinance
that requires notice to individuals up and down the street for
a certain number of feet. We publish a legal notice in the
Mattituck Watchman.
ARTHUR J.- GATEHOUSE: How am I suppose to know that I should
come to a hearing when the names are incorrectly spelled and the
owner's name does not appear.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think the property has c~anged hands and
that Mr. Moore now owns the property.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I don't know.
THE CHA/P~MAN: It isn't our business to determine when the
property changed hands.
-ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: It did change hands.
THE CHAIRMAN: You know that it has changed hands?
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: At Bis notice.
THE CHAIRMAN: And you know that he is appling for approval
of access, and youknow the location of the property? You were
able to identify t~s property now?
ARTHUR Jo GATEHOUSE: After I saw the name of the deed in
the paper. Then I knew what to look for. Mr. Moore was not
'known to me at all.
THE CHAIRMAN: In this situation the application can be
made by the owner of the property prior to the deed changing
hands. In this case you wo,~ not know the new owner of the
property. It's very rare, I can't recall where the owners
name has ever been kept secret for any reason. Either the
former owner or the ~a~ present owner can apply to the
Board. In fact~ I believe the contract was subject to this
variance being granted. Otherwise~ it would be useless to any-
one that would want to develope this into four lots. They
exceed the minimum required by the Health Department w~ich is
20~000 square feet. What is classified as a subdivision is
$outhold Town Board of Appeals
-4-
November 3, 1966
anything over five lots. ~he Zoning Ordinance requires 12,500
square feet of area for each lot and one~f these lots to be
created exceeds that by 100% and the others exceed that requirement
by 50% . There is no question of r~ad frontage.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: This hardship was caused.
THE CHAIRMAN: The hardship goes with the property. This
hardshipwas inherited with the property. You have here 87,500
square feet of property. It would be a hardship to require
anyone to build only one dwellingon a lot of this size.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I disagree with you. It has been
that way for 45 years.
THE CHAIRMAN: Things change in a few years.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I would like to say something about
the safety factor on this road.
THE CHAIRMAN: We would be glad to hear from you about it.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I have lived 'there quite awhile.
There is alot of action on that-road. In 1958 I had a car
cut down my fence. In 1962 another car went through the same
spot~ took down the telephone pole and took down the fence.
Both cars were a total wreck. Then again in 1960 a station
wagon travelling west went right up into the property in
question. The mark is still on the pine tree, right where
the right of way for the property is to be put. This is
three accidents in eight' years. I don't know of any other
place in this area on that type of road where this has
happened. This put three people in the hospital. You have
a corner where you want to quadruple the traffic by creating
another right of way. You will quadruple the cars going on
and off the road.
THE CHAIRMAN: We are concerned with density and traffic
safety~ o~ course, but not as it concerns Town highways in this
type of situation. We can not deny on the basis of traffic
safety a division of oversized lots. In this situation the
lots are over 12,500 square feet.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: There will be four houses instead
of one. Every house will have its. own fresh water well and
cesspool. The Board is well aware of course we are causing this
situation to become worse. If wehave it in the future, I will
know where it happened.
$outhold town Board of Appeals -5-
November
1966
THE CHAIRMAN: We are well aware of the water situation.
We had a water study made by a water ~xpert. There are certain
areas where it is worse than others. This area in question
is not a bad rea.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I would like to refer to the average
setback mentioned in Section 305. And if the Board wishes to
go down and look at the physical setback of the houses on that
side of the street ~. you can go 1000feet and 2000 feet to the
east and 600 feet to the west and determine the average setback.
I would say there are about'20 houses setback 300 feet, perhaps
350 feet. There is one house that is within eyeshot on that
side of the street~ that is not setback 300 feet or'350 feet.
i think that the Board should ask for this setback~ which is
the average setback in accordance with Section 305.
(The Chairman read Section 305 of the Southold Town Building
Zone Ordinance.)
THE CHAIRMAN: We have had to interpret that'as 3~5 feet
being the minimum.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I would like to see this lived up
to the Ietter of t~law. I refer exactly to the front footage
and no6to the width of the property. We have only 5% of the
houses that extend closer than 300 feet. The average setback
is 300 feet~ unless I am wrong.
THE CHAIRMAN: I would say in this case you are wrong.
After the lot is divided~ it is treated different.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: No, it isn't.
THE CHAIRMAN: The lots on Peconic Bay Blvd. would have
35 foot setback.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: What about the lots not on any road?
THE CHAIRMAN.~ The front yard is the area that boarders
on the right of way. The front yard of these two lots would
be Peconic Bay'Blvd.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: These have been made this way by
easement granted by ~b~w this Board.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-6-
November 3, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: This would be restricted to the four people
that will buy houses here.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I am against allof it because of
the way it was presented in the paper on the notice.
THE CHAIRMAN: That was only a minor defect.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: Three defects. Also I wish to mention
the welfare of the property and what it will do to my proper~y.
This will down grade my property and open up the beach to many
people.
THE CHAIRMAN: It won't if it is restricted.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE; It will down g~ade my property so
I will hav~ a value 50% of wha~uit is now.
THE CHAIRMAN: As far as we are concerned we have to disagree
with you. This is a situation where there i~ a hardship. The
hardship here is the size of the lot. That is the reason it is
being divided into four lots.
ARTHUR J.' GATEHOUSE: The prior owner didn'twant to develope
the property and didn't-want to encroach on the privacy of the
people. Then we come down to the welfare of the property.
THE CHAIRMAN: The Ordinance that was passed allowed 12,500
square feet for each building lot. Presumably the Town Fathers
were aware, as a matter of fact I was on the Original Zoning
Commission. One of the problems was to get the lots large
enough. We tri~2~ to compromise between what a farmer could sell
and what we thought was advisable, andstill get the Ordinance
passed at all. The feeling was 12~ 500 square feet~ in developments
20, 000 square feet by Board of Health ruling. Since then there
has been further amendments, such as .requirements for doulbe
houses. We now reqB~rtwo lots. Part of the requirement for
a double house in o~ words would be 25,000 square feet.
There has been other movements town'educing density in the
Zone. We now require 12,500 square feet of land for'cooperative
type apartments.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I am not interested in that. I am
interested in one family residence on this plot as it has been
for 45 years. This ~s the way we waht it. I speak for myself,
Mr. Cardinal on the west and Mr. Crabtree.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-7-
November 3, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Crabtree was concerned that this might
open the right of way to the beach for others who live here.
Someone acorss the street or down the street. It's entirely
in our power here to say that the beach and the right of way
be used only by the residents of the four proposed houses and
their guest~,
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I would also be in agreement with
that. One of these lots does not have the required 100'
frontage. The reason for the variance existed p~br to this.
The hardship was created by a developer so that a builder
could go in there an build houses and have a monetary profit~
and if that is a hardship, I would want to see one that isn't.
THE CHAIRMAN: To deny a person to b~ld because of one
dimension being less than 10% in w~dth where the other
dimension 'exceeds the total area ~100% would be a hardship.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I disagree with you where there is
enough property to build one house or divide this up into four
pieces. There is no real valid reason of hardship for creating
this for four houses, especially at the time when the peti~onor
was only under contract. There was no hardship t~en.
THE CHAIRMAN: I think your reasoning is a little wrong.
The owner of the property .............
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: He was not under hardship. He would
get his money back and therefore he was no, under any hardship.
We are trying to let someone build four houses.
THE CHAIRMAN: The Board is not permitted to consider financial
hardship in that it is a universal hardship. The hardship is
created in the land.
ARTHUR J.' C~ATEHOUSE: The wa~ this was presented and the names
in the paper, I just don't like the whole thing.
MR. HULSE: I think we shuuld point out that he has already
been given approval of access and he could go ahead now and build
the four houses. All this is, is a more sensible division of
the property.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I am challenging the first hearing.
MR. HULSE: Well, you are challenging it in the wrong place.
ARPI~UR J. C~%~EHOUSE: I ~-~ challenge it here.
Southold ~own Board of Appeals
-8-
November 3, 1966
THE CHAIRMAN: You can appeal this to a higher court. I am
sure the Board feels the same way they did at the first hearing.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: The same night in August, the former
owner sat on this Board.
THE CHAI/~AN: He did not $~t in on this hearing° He
deliberately excused himself.
G. HARVEY MOORE.~ That door was closed the night of the
hearing. My attorney and I both noticed it.
ARTHUR J. GATEHOUSE: I challenge the notice that was put
forth at the first meeting. I wish that the Board would look
into the facts. It would save alot of trouble.
THE CHAIRMAN: As far as the ~efects in the notice, they
are minor and this was properly published in the official
newspaper of the Town. As far as your objections are concerned
you are free to take them to a higher court.
Is there anyone else who wishes to speak against this
application?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions?
MR. ~E: Just want to point out that this was already
divided and this will make a more sensible division.
THE C~AIRMAN: I am sure that Mr. Moore will be agreeable
to the condition that the beach and the right of way will be
only for the owmers of the four proposed lots and their guests.
G. HARVEY MOORE: I am agreeable to that.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak one
way or the other on this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals
November 3, 1966
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant requests approval of access on a right of way
to ser~e two interior lots on Peconic Bay. All four lots
to be created exceed the mininum requirements of the Southold
Town Building Zone Ordinance. The Board points out that access
for this property in question was granted on August 18~ 1966.
The present application is a more sensible division ofthe
property and places the right of way in the center of the
property. The Board finds that~after the necessary improvements
are made on the right of way it will be accessible to all
emergency equipment.
The Board finds that~strictapp~ication of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created-'is~unique and would not be shared by
all tx operties alike in the immediate vicinity of this
property and in the same use district and the variance does
observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the
character oflthe district.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that G. Harvey Moore, Kirby Lane, Jamesport,
New York, be granted~pproval of access on a right of way on
property located on the south side Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel
New York~ as shown on the map by Alden W. Young, map dated
September 27, 1966. This approval of access is granted subject
to the following conditions:
1. The right of way shall be subject to the final spproval
of the Southotd Town Building Inspector.
2. The right of way and the beach-property shall be used
only by the prospective owners of the four proposed lots and
their guests.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. GillisI~, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
Mr. Bergen did not participate in the above hearing because
of conflict of interest.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- November 3, 1966
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 985 - 8:00 P~M.i~.D.S.T.), Upon
application of Arthur:C. Downs, 608 S. Oak Lane, Primos,
Pennsylvania, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, Article X, Section IDOA,
for permission .to divide property. Location of property: north
side Peconic Baa'Blvd., Laurel, New York, lots numbered west
onehalf of 13, all of 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, I9, and 31,
Downs Subdivision, Laurel, New York. Fee paid $5°00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting
to its publication in the official newspaper, andnotice to the
applicant.
THE CHAIPJMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
WILLIAM WICt~L%M',' ESQ.: I just like to say a word about it.
The original map was filed in 1920. The lots on the north side
of the Blvd. were about 60 feet on the road, and those on the
south side of the Blvd. were about 50 feet on the Blvd. We
have only 390 feet left. The ~ lots are much larger than the
lots in the development.
THE CHAIRMAN: ~-~ many lots have been built on?
WILLIAM ~, ESQ.: Except for'a few lots up north,
they are all built on.
THE CHAIRMAN: What is the size of the lots in the development?
WILLIAMWICKHAM, ESQ.': Where the right' of way is they are 50
feet by 150 feet, and some had greater depth.
THE CHAIRMAN: The lots to be created would be larger?
WII~IAMWICKHAM, ESQ.: These would be much larger than any
other lots in the development.
MR. HULSE:'We should point out that'this is far in excees
of the 12,500 square feet requirement.
THE CHAIRMAn,: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-11-
Novenber 3, 1966
THE CHAINMAN: Are there any questions for Mr. Wickham?
(There%as no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant requests permissiOns%to divide property. The
appellant owns 390 feet frontage on Peconic Bay Blvd. The
appellant wishes to re-subdivide this property so that there
are three lots of 100 foot frontage and one lot of 90~foot
frontage. The Board finds that all of the lots to be
created meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
as it cuncerns total area. The Board further finds that
the lots to be created are substantially larger than other
lots in the immediate area.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
would produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance does obserbe
the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character
of the district.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grignnis, it was
RESOLVED that Arthur'C. Downs, 608 S. Oak Lane, Primos,
Pennsylvania, be granted permission to divide property located
on the north side Peoonic Bay Blvd., Laurel, New York, as shown
on the Map by Otto W. Van Tuyl & Son, map dated April 3~ 1962.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr.
Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 986 - 8:00 P.M.'![E~D.S.T.)z Upon
application of Cedric H. Wickham, Suffolk Avenue, Mattituck,
New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission
to retain the following signs: 1) one directional sigh'on the
south east corner of Main Road and South Harbor Lane, Southold,
New York~ bounded north by Main Road, east by Diller'Bros.,
south by Diller Bros., west by South Harbor ~ane; 2) one directional
sign on the south west corner of South Harbor-Lane and Hiawatha's
Path, Southold, New York, bounded north by South Harbor Lane,
east by Hiawatha's Path~ south by Grace M. Mitchell, west by Grac3
M. Mitchell; 3) one directional sign on the south east corer of
~ou~hold Town Board of Appeals
-12-
November 3, 1966
Bay View Avenue and Nokomis Road, Southold, New York, bounded
north by Bay View Avenues east by Peter' Sarkus, south by Peter
Sarkus, west by Nokomis Road. Fee paid $5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special exception, legal .notice ofhearing, affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to the appellant.
THE CHAIRMAN= Is there anyone present-who wishes to speak
for
~w~xthe application?
.(There was no response. )
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
(There was no response.
THE CHA/_RMAN: The application is not accompanied by the
proper permission for land owners. It is accompan~d by a letter
that states the three signs are in-Town Highway and this Board
has.no aUthority to grand signs in the Town Highways.
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the appellant requests permission to located three off premises
directional signs. Sign number one is located on the south
east corner of Main Roadand South Harbor Lane; sign number
two is on the South west corner of South Harbor Lane and Hiawatha's
Paths sign number 'three is loc ated on the north west corner of
Bay~water Avenue and Nokomis Road. All three signs are for
direction to real estate business. The Boardfinds that all
three signs are located on property of the Town Highway. The
Board of appeals does not have the authority to grant signs
on public property, and accordingly, this application is hereby
denied.
The Board f~nds that the public convenience and welfare
and justice will not be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts
will be permanently or ~ substantially injured andre spriit
of the Ordinance will n~t be observed.
On motion by Mr. Hulse, ~econded by Mr. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVED that Cedric H. Wickham, Suffolk Avenue~ Mattituck~
New York~ be d~ied permission to locate~ directional signs
as applied for on the application dated September 26, 1966.
..... gongs VO~E OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse,
Southoldtown Board of Appeals -13- November 3, 1966
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was
RESOLVED that the SouttDld Town Board of Appeals set 7:30
P.~M.~(E~S~Tj)~ Thursday, November 17, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing
upon application of George Ahlers, Eugenes Road, Cutchogue~New
York, a/c George Graham~ Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New
York, for a variance in'~accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III, Section 300, Subsection 6, for permission to erect
an accessory building in the front yard area. Location of property:
east side Nassau Point Road, Lot number 68 in Nassau Point Club
Properties, Inc., Cutchogue, Ne~ York.
Vote of '~e Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse,
Mr. Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded'by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board.of Appeals set 7:40
p~M~.S~T.), Thursday, November 7, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place'ofhearing
upon~plication of Ann G. Carl, executrix of the will of Margaret
L. Baumgartner~ Mallazd Drive, Lloyd Neck, New York, for a variance
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article II~ Section 307,
for permission to reduce side yard area. Location ofproperty:
north west corner of Little PeconicBay Blvd., and Nassau Point
Road,' lotnumber 144 in Nassau Point. Club Properties~ Inc.,
Cutchogue, New York.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillisipie, Mr. Bergen,
Fir. Hulse, Fu~. Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. B~rgen, seconded by Mr. Grigu~is, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set'8:00
P.M,~'.SYT.), Thursday, November 17, 1966, at the Town Office~
Main Roads Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing,
upon application of John A.-Clarke, a/c Harbor Cove, Inc.,
Vanston Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York, for a vari~ rice
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,Article III, Section 304,
for permission to reduce front y~rd setback. Location of pro-
perty: south side Sailors Lane, massau Point, Cutchogue, new
York, bounded north by Sailors Lane, eas% by Harbor Cove, Inc.,
south by Wunneweta Pond, west by Harbor ~ove,INc.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen,
Mr. Hulse, ~Lr. Grigonis.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -14-
November 3, 1966
On motion by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigor~, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:15
P~'M.'.(E.'S.T.), Thursday, November 17, 1966, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, ~ew York as the time and place of hearing
upon application of stanley corwin, Esq., 114 MainStreet, Green-
port, New York, a/c John M. Rodden and Wife, and Robert'Zimmerman
and Wife, fora special exception in accordance With the Zoning
Ordinance, Article X, Section 1007, fubsection' (b), for'permission
to change the classification of a non-conforming multiple residence.
Location of property: south side Main Road, O~-nt, New York, ~ounded
north by Main Road, east by Frank J. Miller, south by H.'M. Demarest
and sons, west by Private Road.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen,
Mr. Hulse,Flr. Grigonis.
On motion by Mr. HulSe~ seconded by M_r. Grigonis, it was
RESOLVE~that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:30
P.M.(E~'S~T.)~ Thursday, NOvember 17, 1966, at'the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place cf hearing
upon application of'Walter Uhl, a/c Henry J. Schuler, Peconic
Bay Btvd,,~Laurel, Kew York, for a variance in accordance with
the ZoningOrdinance, Artlicle III, Section 307, ~or permission
to reduce the side yard area. Loc ation of property: south side
Peconic Bay Blvd., Laurel~ New York bounded north by Peconic
Bay Blvd., east by'D~J~ Stack, south by Great'Peconic Bay, west
by MJBo' Pellmann.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillis~ie, Mr. Bergen,
Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis.
On motion by Fir. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. HUlse, it was
RESOLVEDthat the minutes of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals dated October 20, 1966, be approved as submitted.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mrl Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr.
Hulse, Mr. Grgionis.
~/ ~ ~/~ ~ The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of App~a±s
~;~ /~ //~.~~e held at 7:30 P, MJ,' Thursday, November 17, 1966~ at the '~
~'~/~~ffice~. ~ain Ro~d, Southold, New York. ~
~ Respectfully submitted~ ~
Barbara C. Dittmann~ Secretary