Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-08/10/1967 APPEAl. BOARD MEMBERS Robert ~Y,/i 'GilJispi¢, Jr., Chairm~n Robert Bergen Charles Gregonis, ,Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, .Jr. Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Y. Telephone SO 5-£660 MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS August 10, 1967 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 10, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert'W. Gillispie, Jr.~ Chairman;Robert Bergen, Fred Hulse, Jr.,~ Charles Grigonis, Jr. Absent: Mr. Serge Doyen, Jr. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1132 - 7:30 Upon application of Ruth Ann Brown, Southold~ New York,. a/c Ragna Bie, P~ivate Road, Horton Point,. Southold, New York~ for a variance in accordancewith the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, Article X, Section 1000A,. for permission to divide property-with undersize waterfront lots and for approval of access in accordance with the State of New York Town Law~ Section 280A. Location of property: north side private road, Horton Point~ Southold~ New York, bounded north by Long Island Sound~ east by Vincent Sardi, Sr.~ south by right of way, west by W%R. Miller. Fee paid $5°00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for~ a variance and approval ofaccess~ legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper of the Town and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- August 10~ 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: The applicant has applied for a right of waya which .is a reasonable request under these conditions andhas been done before by this Board. Is there anyone present-who wishes to speak in favorlof this application? (There was no response. ) THE CHAIRMAN: .Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? FR~/~K JINA: I am speaking forM r, Sardi,~ Sr. I am his son-in-law. When we bought these lots we bought them with 100 foot frontage~ and wehave 200 ~eet frontage in there. If these lots are splitup it will give precedent to have the other people cut their lots up. We feel v~ry strongly since we all have established homes on these lots. We bought these lots with the idea of 100 foot frontage on each. We feel that this could be taken out-of the family and it might deteriorate the whole value of the property. TRE CHAIRMAN: You are a resident in the area? FRANK'JILNA: We live on Mr. Sardi's property. Iam. speakin~ for'Mr. Sardi. MR.' BERGEN: Where is your property in relation to this ? FRANK JI~A: Right next to it. THE CHAIRMAN: What is the width of your' property? FRA~-JINA: 200 feet frontage by 600 feet. We have two lots east of this. We adjoin ~the property in question. T~E CHAIRMAN: The lot in question appears to be 226 feet wide by considerable depth. FRANK J/~IA: We all have approximatelythe same depth, This would establish precedent'that-everybody couldhave 50 fOot'lots. Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- August 10, 1957 MR. BERGEN: No. These are 100 foot lots bu~_ they have on the beach bathing privleges of 50 some feet, TP~~ CHA~: This is the original property and this is the present residence right here. FRANK JINA: They want to divide these into four 50 foot lots. THE CPi~IRMAN: They ~re not for' residential use. They are right of ways to the water. There can only be one residence on each parcel. FRANK JINA: You will put four residence on 100 foot parcel. We all built on 100 foot parcels. You are putting four residence on 100 feet plots in width. THE CP~IRMAN: There are no restrictions,~ even in the subdivision restrictions that wQ~ld permit .the maintaining of the type of restriction you are talking~about~ .~at~would FRANK JINA: Doesn't the Zoning Ordinance hold 100 feet to the water front line? THE CHAIRMAN: No, we don~tmention water front. The Zoning Ordinance requires 100' feet by 125 feet~ which is a good deal smaller than any'cf the lots we are discussing here, The mininum for subdivisions is 20,000 square feet, 100 feet by 200 feet. This is not considered a subdivision for Zoning Purposes. It would have to be more than four lots. This is a private division of property that has been done in mB sections of the Town on many large lots. There are plenty of times, and I don't know if you have had this experience or not, the assessment has been increased on the property. Mine was increased by $5%. Some of myneighbors were increases as much as 120%. Itbecomes a hardship in manycases to, maintain these hugh original lots. Times change and circumstances change. FRANK JINA: We are all in the same boat. We all have to assume the same responsibility. THE C~AIRMAN: What we ~e concerned with here is zoning. Our purpose here is to insist that the owner of the property has some rights too. This isn't all a one way street. We don't decree things here that we would like to see. I am quite sure this is a reasonable req~st. Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- HUgust 10~. 1967 FRANK JINA: This is being cut into more than four-~ts. It is six lots. T~E~CHAIRMAN: These are beach privleges thatbelong to the front lots. They can't be use~ for' residential purposes. MR. HULSE: They are. right of ways to the water. THE CP~IRFR%N: In effect, these are on 'the right of ways to the water. They are no plots of land. (The proposed layout of the property was explained showing the right of ways to the beach.) OTTO LI/qDER/W2EYER: What will be to.stop them from getting a variance in a couple or,ars to build on that-land just'a beach cottage. THE CHAIRMAN: There will be conditions placed on this property~if this is granted~ that nobuildings shall be built O~ this. OTTO LINDEP~EYER: Don't you have restrictions stating certain sizes ofland, and are they being maintained in this? THE CHAIRMAN: Yes they are. OTTOLINDERMEYER: Really. What-is the width of~his Say anyone of those. THE CHAIRMAN: 113 feet and 130 feet~ on this dimension~ 131 feet on this ~ension~ OTTO' LINDERbREYER: What is the right of way? THE CHAIRb~/~: 16 feet~, eight feet on each side. OTTO LINDERMEYER: That doesn't-make it 100 feet. THE CHAIRMAN: Yes~ it does as far as zoning is concerned. FRANK JINA: Doesn't this piece have to be 100 feet wide~ THE CHAIRMAN: You can sell as much sr as little land as you want~ but if it doesn't meet the area requirements you can't build on it. OTTO LINDERMEYER: If this is legal why is the meeting called? Southold Town Board of Appeals -5-- August 10,~ 1967 THE'CHAIRF~%N: If someone applies to build a house, there was a fellow in here just before. He had a lot that is a parallelogram. It is ll0 feet on the road,, but where he wants to put the.house it is 100 feet. He Wants to-put u~ a house 76 feet wide. The Zoning Ordinance ~qu~s 25 feet side yards. This is an unusual situation. Everything isn't layed out in squares or oblong,, and often you have terrain and beach~ you have deep lots which are occasioned by the way the Town is developed. There are quit~ a few situations li~,e~hi$ This is a very deep lot and the owner-wants to divide it up for sale or for members of the family. These are well in excess of the Zoning minimum. FRANK JINA: What is the Zoning minimum? THE CHAIRMA/g: 100 feet-by 125 feet. These are larger than that. MRS.' REISE: We own 200 feet next-to LindermeyerandHrs. McKayo The present dwelling where Bie lives a is this the lot in question. Is this to be divided into four pieces and there is tobe four houses ~n it? THECHA~MAN: If you want to look at the map, I think the map can explain it better than I can/ MR~ REISE: These are all houses to be? THE CHAIPd~g: They'could be. is no building application-now. property at this moment. They are lots to be. There They just-want to divide the MRS. REISE: Some of our deeds state there is only one dwelling per lot. THE CHAIRMAN: That's right. MRS,- REtSE: Is that in all of the, deeds? THE CHAIRMA5~: I don' t know. FRANK JINA: These are tayout,~[100 feet-by 600 feet and that was called a lot~ and now what theyare doingis subdividin~ a lot, and that is what we are objecting to. Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- August 10, 1967 MRj REISE: I thnk the thing that is alarming ~us all here is beginning With Bie and the last lot ~herea we have a beautiful~ strip of private beach. We all enjoy this beach and have come to love it. Now we are faced with four more owners and we will spoil the character of the beach. FRANK JINA: We were sold this 100 .feet by 600 feet for one residence. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you have your deed with yoo? Can you tell if there are any deed restrictions? We are no, in the business of enforceing deed rest~tions. OTTO LINDERMEYER: What is in this plan that is lacking that requires this meeting? I really would like to know. THE CHAIRMAN: The approval of access. These two lots, if you want to call them lots~ are presentlywithout access and could not be us~. OTTO LINDERMEYER: Could I make one more point? When the land was sold to us, it was sold in such a way to keep-the parcels very large. If this requires some sort of variance it defeats the purpose of the original ideal location we live in. I don'tthink the landshould be made more useable. Why should be bend the Ordinance to let him make the use of this land? MR. BERGEN: The Town is limiting him to one house on each lot. OTTO LINDERMEYER: You are putting this complex in our mat. MRSj REISE: Could thatright of way become anything else? Could it become a through-fare? THE ~ CHAIRF~%/q: No. FRANK JINA: What is to stop them from putting more than one house on there. Have you looked at the-original deed to see if there are restrictions on it? THE CHAIRMAN: That doesnJt ~-~-~ concern us. After a lot is divided into twolots we are talking about two plots of land and a residence may be constructed on either one. There Southold T, own Board of Appeals -7- --~/g~st 10~ 1967 are many situations like this on Peconic Bay Blvd. Originally these lots were set up 200 feet wide and many of these people found it was a hardship to maintain theseproperties forI one reason or another, not necessarily taxes. As people get older theywant less land to foul with. This has been done foryears. This is not something that can be controlledby'zoning. This is much larger than present zoning requires either in single lots or subdivisions. OTTOLINDERMEYER: Does the Zoning Ordinance indicate how much front footage you have to have on the water? THE CHAIRMAN: No, it isn't related to water front footage. I think it would be fine to keep lots 200 feet by 600 feet, but there is pressure onus from all ~/~ections. The Town is increaseing in size rapidily, taxes are increaseing. OTTO'LINDERMEYER: You mean to say you have no controll over how many houses can be built on these lots. THE CHAIRMAN: ~e house on each lot. OTTO LINDEn: What is to stop them from selling these to individual people. That will ~ave them half of the legal size lot. TH~HA~: They would have to come in here to get a variance. They are about 75 per cent of the legal minimum. OTTO LINDERMEYER: Nothing to say that'they can't sell the lots to people and that they can't sell the land and build on it. And these are three quarters of the minimum size required. THE CHAIRMAN: A condition of granting this variance would be no structure of any kind can be constructed on this land~ the beach strip. OTTO-LINDEP~EfER : With pressing ~imes and tax increase this could be changed? THE CHAIRMAN: I canSt foresee it. $outhoid Town Board of Appeals -8- AUgUSt 10~ 1967 OTTO LINDEPuv~EYER: These pieces of land are individual pieces except for the right of way,~ northing more than a driveway. There are six plots of lan~ I would say,. two undersized and four rectangular,~ two of-which are quite small. THE CHAIRMAN: Sometimes the strip is much narrowe~ than this. OTTO'LINDERMEYER: That might be an advantage. THE' CHAIRMAN: Is the applicanthere? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: As Iunderstand it the reason for doing this~ the people propose to divide this property for the family. MRS.' REISE: If they gave in the deed one house to this lot~ can they change'that. Can they get four houses? T~E CHAIRMAN: There cannot be a zoning Ordinance to enforce the deedrestrictions. FRANK'JINA: These deed restrictions were set up by Mr. Hyatt. What the Zoning Board is doing, is going against~the deed restrictions. THE CHAIRMAN: First we are g~inq to create four lots. FRANK'JINA: There are six lots. MR.' SARDI, SR.-: I understand :that they want to build for the children is that right2 THE CHAIRMAN: .That is:w~at I understand. Actually. this man could make six lots~ that would be including the beach. OTTOLINDERMEYER: I still submit that a lot can not be connected when you consider two pieces of land oomplete~y unconnected. I am afraid I don~t follow you. MR.~ REISE: Can we do anymore than object. THE CHA/RMAN: The purpose of a public hearing is to elicit information from the people. Facts, not opinions that are revelent to ~thedetermination of the Board of Appeals. As I Southold Town Board of Appeals-9- August 10.~ 1R67 understand Mr. Moses has said there are usuallyno 'facts brought out by the people at public hear~ngs~ 3ust opinions or ideas. And the ideasmay be good. MRS.' LINDERMEYER: Is there anyweight in a~l or'us objecting to this? THECHAIRMAN: None at all. The courts have determined that the Board of Appeals do not make decisions on the basis of popularity contest. It could be the other way. Therecould ~be 100 people for it. MRS. LI~DE~:-Our arguments carry no wieght? THE CHAIRMAN: The only thing that.has~een brought out is the importance.of attaching conditions to this variance which would prevent anybody from building on the beach area. MR. TOEI~TER: The notice in the. paper stated undersized water front-lots. THE CHAIRMAN: Am an could have an undersized lot that might be ten acres because he might nnly have 99 feet on the highway. That would be undersized as defined in the Ordinance because the Ordinance requires 12a500 square feet and 100 feet frontage on the highway or private right, of way. MR. TOEDTER: Why would the paper mention undersize water front lots? THE~: BeCause that isi~aat it is. You can'tmake an Ordinance to fit every piece of property in the Town. MR. TOEDTER: Then you ar~aking a variation to the~ Ordinance? THE CHAIRMAN: We are making a variation of the interpre~tion of undersize lot. OTTOLINDERMEYER: What were you speaking of in the advertising? $outhold Town Board of Appeals -10- August 10,~ 1967 THE ~: I will read you the definition of a lot. "Lot- Land occupied otto be occupied by a building and its accessory buildings togetherwith such open spaces as are required under this Ordinance and having its pricipal front- age ~pon a public street orofficially approved place." In this case,~ the officially approved Place would be the right of way. OT~OL/IqDEPJ~EYER: Would you consider that a validlot? It doesn't have 100 feet on the right of way. THE CHA~: For the purpose of~ning this is a widened right of way:to the beach. A right of way can be owned or_ you can have right of way over it. Some people want to own a right of ~aya some don't. OTTO-LINDERMEYER: What constitutesminimumunders~ed waterfront lots? /~R~ REISE: You said that you w~e hereto determine facts. Can you describe some of the facts~hat you are here to determin9 so that wemay give some facts instead of opinions. THE CHAIRMAN: I think that is a fair question. This lot is approximately three acres in area~, I think we all agree on that~ and the proposed division will leave each residential lot of more than the-required width and area~ ~]so a parcel of waterfront to be used by each residential lot' owner. Access will be provided from the existing private road to. the interior lots and ,through the interior lots for the~Dnt lots ~-~ to reach the beach. This is the one of the, largestlots in the area~ I think we are a~reed on that. Each of the-proposed building lots are larger than the Zoning Ordinance requires-~nd will ~-~be used for residential purposes so there~ilt actually. be no change or ~harm to the neighborhOod or surrounding area. ~IDEN. TIFI~D SPEAEER: What would the size of 'the plot be after the division~ that the structure now stands on? MR. HUASE: 143 feet by 215 feet~ 143 feet along~the right of way. OTTO LINDERMEYER: What is the width of the .next lot behind it? THE CHAIRMAN: 113 feet. Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- August 10.,, 1967 OTTO' LINDERMEYER: DoesnJt that have to have 100 feet on the road? How about the back lot,~ w~nat does that-have once road? THE CHAIRMAN: ~nat would have 195 feet on the right of way O~TO' LINDERMEYER: On the right ofway to what,~ (,The proposed right of ways as shown on the map submitted with the application were again discussed at some lenght. ) THE CHAIRMAN: This is not setting a precedent. This has been done for 10 years. You are not creating precedent here. We are merely following' previ~$~ precedents both in this Town and many others. If you have a-piece of property that-is .500 feet wide and 1000 feet deep~ if you can't divide it up you are stuck with it. MRS.~ 'LINDERMEYER: Do we have any recourse from this decision? THE'~AIRMAN: If this application is favorable to the applicant~ and I think it will be this is a perfectly reasonable request,~. I can see how you are surprised by that. You are permitted to appeal this within 30 days from the filing of the action with the Town' Clerk. The action will probably'be signed two weeks from tonight and the next'day filed with the Town Clerk. YouI then have 30 days to appeal it in court. You are perfectly~at liberty, to do SO. FRANK JINA: I still want- to get back to the point that lot-has only 15 feet on the right of way. THE C~: The minimum required is 15 feet for the purpose of emergency vehicles= fire equipment~ ambulances. That is all that is required Under state'Law for access. minimum OTTO LINDER~ER: Again,~ what is the/size of the plot? T~E C~: 100 feet'frontage on the road or'an improved right of way. A right of way that meets the requirements~ and it is inspected by the Bund ing Inspector. OTTO'LINDERMEYER: Does it have to go anywhere? THE CH~IRMAN~It~as to be shown o~6he map. Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- August 10~ 1967 MRS. L/!~DKRMEYER: Is it for all of our use? THE CHAIRMAN: No1, it is aprivate.right ofway. The right of way will apply only to these~peo~le. OTTOL/!~DERMEYER: The front of' this lot ins't on the right of way. THE'CHAIRMAN: Some people think of the front as the sound instead of the part facing on the right ofway or publi=_ highway. OTTO LINDERMEYER: Would you have in your book the definition of a right, of way. (The Chairman read-Section280A of the New 'fork State Town Law as requested by Mr. Lindermeyer.) MR.- TOEDTER: Are these rightof ways in existance? Do they have to be approved? MR, HULSE: They haveto be approved. MR. TOEDTER: It-has to be cleared and inspected before it is improved? MR.' HULSE: Thatis right. MR.' REISE: If this hedge has to come down and it will ~h~re the right of way is going it~will change the character of the neighborhood. This is going to become a first class Coney Island before you get done down there. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Hulse has pointed out somethin~.~ He assumes ~that it wouldbe possible for this person to s~ell 43 feet of land to lot three ,(a) and leave himself six feet~ enough to walk down to the beach. { A lenghty discussion was held trying to determine the best possible way for this property to be divided.) THE CHA//~4AN: Are there any other questions concerning this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: We will close the hearing at this time and the Board will act on the application later in the evening. Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- August 10, 1967 ' PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No& 1~$~- 7:45 Upun application of Joseph Goubea~aa~Main Road, 6utchogue~' New York. for a special exception in accordance withthe Zoning Ordinance, Article III. Section 300~ Subsection 10, for permission to erect an on premises business sign in a reSidenti~ area. Location of property; south side Main Road, Cutchogue, New York~ bounded north by'Main Road, east-by land now or formerly of J.'A. H~nd, south byEdithHoffman, westby Edith Hoffman. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hear/~g by reading the application for a special exception~ legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? MR~L GOUBEAUD: There now has been a change for the si~n since I t~lked to Howard Terry. I told him this was a part time job which it was at the time, but since Ihave feund, at my regular job I am going tcbe cut 0ctober. 1st by-1550.801 This put this as a pretty important job. I would like to' include that immy appeal. THE CHAIRMAN: What is the si~n for? MR~ GOUBEAUD: To identify my'product, THE CHAIRMAN: What is your product? MR~ GOUBEAUD: Electric-Lux. It is a small oblong sign. MR.' HDLSE: HOw long have you lived at this location? MR. GOUBEAUD: One year. THE C~~: You are asking forh~ something we ~an"t give. There areno provisions in the Ordinance for turning residence into part time business use. MR-~' GOUBEAUD: There is a sign on the law~b~%ready. I don't use the house for the busies. I just live.there. THE CHAIRMAN: If you could do this,, anybody in the Town could do it. Many people in the Townhave part time jobs. Southdd Town Board of Appeals -14- August 10t 1967 MRj HULSE: You are allowed to have a sign with your name on it. MR. BERGEN~ If you were in a business district you would be permitted a sign. MR. GOUBEAUD: Why did Howard ask me to fill this out if didn't have a hope? THE C~: One of the things the building inspector is cautioned about is trying to outguess this Board. MR~ GOUBEAUD: Howa~dtold me this was not a business district~ that if'I had bought it for'business I got stuck. THE CHAIRMAN: You can't advertise a business in a res~ntial area. It is as simple as that. This~ something we have never permitted. Is there anything further on the application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to ereet an on premises business sign in a residential area. The Board finds that the applicant is a salesman for"ElectricLux"and so wishes to identify himself by a sign on the property. The Board finds there are no provisions in the Zoning Ordinance to permit on premises advertising in a residential area~ If the applicant had business zoned property he could erecttthe type of sign requiested. The' Board points out that-the~ applicant is entitled to erect'a signshowing only his name. The size of the sign shall be no larger than twosquare, feet. The Board finds that the, public convenience and welfare and justice wil'l~ served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will be permanently or~substant~lly injured and the spi~ of the Ordinance will not be observed. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -15- August 10~1967 On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by'Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that Joseph Boubeaud, Main Road, Cutchogue, N~ York, be DENIED permission to erect an on premises business sign in a residential area on property located on the south side Main Road, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes_Mr. Gillispie, Mr, Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. Mr. Ernest Radford appea~-before the Board for'an informal discussion in regardto a lot owned by'Mr. Dorman. The property is located on a private road known as Robinson Road, Greenport, New York~ lot number 7 on a map of Sterling Harbor'Homesites. This lot has insufficientfrontage and area. In the past, the ~ present owner of the lot was giveq permission to use this prop~ty for the mooring of one boat. Mr. Radford Wanted to know if it would be possible for the prospective purchaser of this lotto own boat plus others. The Board advised that'they were no inclined to grant such a request. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVEDthat-the decision on Appeal No. 1132, upon applicatiOn of Ragna Bie, Southold~ Ne w York~ be reserved until the next regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-Mr. Gillispie~ Mrl Bergen~ Mr. Hulse, Mrl Grigonis. On motion by Mr~ Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was P~SOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of Appeals dated~July 24~ 1967, be approved as submitted. Vote of the Board:' ~yes:-Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr, Hulse,. Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -t6- August 10, 1967 On motion by'Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVE~ that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P. MJ~(E.'D.'S.T~),i Thursday, August 24~ 1967, at the Town Office. Main Road, Southold, New York, as thetime'and place of hearing upon applicatioD6~ Cutchogue Chamber of'Commerce, Cutchogue, New York, for a spedal exception in accordance with theZoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, .for permission tocerect the following off'premises signs:l) a sign. on the property of Chester Orlowski, located on the north side M~n Road, East~Cutchogue.~ New York~ bounded north by A. Greyszko~ east by M.'E. Case, south by Main Road, west by'~i'Cj Rysko; 2) a sign on the~property of John Wickham,-located on the north side Middle' Road., Cutchogue~ New York, bounded north by A. Pietrewicz, east by'A. Pietriewicz, south by Middle Road,. west-by Hen~y~P. Wickham; 3) a sign on the property of-Williem J. Baxter~ Sr., located on the south side Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north byMain Road~ east by Down's Creek, south by New Suffolk Avenue-WilliamE. Hoston, west by D. Andruski; 4)a sign on the property of-William Wickham, located on the south side fiddle Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Middle Road, east by Moore'Est.~ south by'Long Island Railroad, west by E. TuthNll; 5) a sign on the property of James Dean, south side New Suffolk Avenue~ Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by New Suffolk~ Avenue~ east by Liebell-Seaman, south by Peconic-Bay, west'by Reeve- Beachwood Sub. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that therSouthold Town Board of Appeals, set 7:50 P~M~(E.D.'S~Tj~,. Thursday, August 24, 1967~ at the T=wn Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as ithe bime and place of hearingupon application of George Ahle~s, EugeneRoad, Cutchogue, New York~ a/c George Akscin, Reydon Shores, SouthOld~. New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IIIi Section 307, for permission to build a new one family residence with insufficient-side ~yard area. Location of property: east sideWellsAvenue, Southold, New York, bounded north by G.H. Wells'IEst~, east by Jo~key~Creek, south by'George McFadden, west by Wells Road .... Vote of the Board: Ayes~ ALL Southold Town Board of Appeals -17- August 10, 1967 The next regular meeting of the'.$outhold Town Board of Appeals will be held at'7:30 P.M., Thursday, August 24, 1967, at'the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. The meeting was adjourned at 10:80 P~'M.- Respectfully submitted~ Barbara C. Dittmann~ Seeretary SoUthold Town BoardTof Appeals APPROVED