Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-02/02/1967Southold Town Board Is SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. Telephone SO 5 2-660 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert W. Gillispie, Jr,, Chairman Robert BerBen Charles Gregonis, Jr. SerBe Doyen, Jr. Fred Hulse, Jr. MINUTES SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS February 2, 1967 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, February 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen, Fred Hulse, Jr., Charles Grigonis, Jr. Absent: Mr. Serge Doyen, Jr. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 993 - 7:30 P.M.{E.S.T.),, Upon the Board's motion a rehearing on Appeal number 993 upon application of'WilliamBeebe, New Suffolk'Lane, Cutchogue, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection-A, as Section 1002 applies,for permission to retain an on premises identification ground sign. Location of property: east side New Suffolk-Lane, Cutchogue, New ~ork, bounded north by Walter Teresko, east by Walter-Teresko, south by W.m. Beebe, west by New Suffolk Lane. The Chairman opened the hearing, by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- February 2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: The applicant has asked for a rehearing because of the location of the sign. After further investigation and inspection the Board has called this hearing. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: I will speak for it. The present location of the sign is the best location. It is not possible to move the sign five feet from the property line and still obtain visibility. This is a business area. The property is zoned business. The original comments for the relocation of the sign should be modified to keep the sign where it is. It attracts less attention where is is, in a more residential area, than it would otherwise. Is there anyone present to speak against this application? ~There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests pe~,LLission to retain an on premises identification sign with insufficient setback from the property line. The Board ~nds after further investigation that the original action to relocate the sign should be modified and the sign should remain in the present location. The Board finds 'that the property in question is zoned "B" BusineSs. The sign attracts less attention where it is, in a more residential area, than it would otherwise. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injmred and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Fir. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that William Beebe~ New Suffolk'Lane, Cutchogue, New York, be granted permission to retain an on premises identification sign with insufficient setback on property located on the east side New Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue~ New York, as applied for, subject to the following conditions: Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- February 2, 1967 1. The sign shall be granted for one (1) year only, renewable annuallyupon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1034 - 7:35 Upon application of Ralph M. Verni, 746 Merrick Road, Baldwin, New York, for a variance in accordance with the'Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, Article X, Section 1000A, for per- mission to divide property with insufficient frontage. Location of property: south side Peconic Bay Blvd.~ Lu~rel, New York, bounded north by~Peconic Bay~lvd., east by V~P, Brady, south by Great Peconic Bay, west'by J.V. O'Sullivan. Fee paid $5.00. TheChairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of heaming~ affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, andnotice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? MR. BERGEN: I l~oked the proPertyover. It was there long before zoning went into effect. There is no other way to divide the property. Several neighbors askedme what was going on, and I told them, and they have no objection to it. THE'CHAIRMAN: I would agree with you. I think we should divide this property just'as the survey reads. Is there anyone present to speak against this application? (There was no response. ) Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- February 2, 1967 After investigation and inspection theBoard finds that the applicant requests permission to divide property with insufficient frontage. ~ne Board finds that the property is not capable oflbeing divided in any other 'man~/~-rthan that-was presented in the application. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that strictapplication of the Ordinance would produce practical difficulties or'unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not-be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity-of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the. Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr.. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED~ that-Ralph M. Verni, ~46 Merrick-Road, Baldwin, New York, be granted permission to divide propertywith ins=~ficient frontage, property located on the south side Peconic Bay~Blvd., Laurel, New York. Division of property granted as applied for, subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shallot ask for any'side yard variances for either lot. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Hulse, Fir. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1035 - 7:45 P.M.(E.S..T~)~ Upon application of Ralph C~nklin, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a special 'exception in accordance with the Zoning ~rdinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsec~ on ~), .for permission to retain wall signs. -Location of property: north side Ma-inRoad, Southold, ~New York, bounded north by~A.W~ Hahn, east_byMilt Creek, south by'Main Road, west by A.W. HAhn. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by r~ding the application for a special exc~otion, legal notice or'hearing, affidavit attesting to ~ publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRb~N: Is there anyone present to speak for this application? (There was no responses) Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- February 2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against~this applicatinn? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain and display two wall signs. The applicant does not display a ground sign. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be ebserved. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it RESOLVEDthat Ralph Conklin, Main Road,-Southold, New York, be granted permission to retain two wall signs on property located on the north side Main Road, Southold, New York, as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be granted for one (1) year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject-to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning'Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The applicant agrees to forego is right to a ground' sign. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Huls~, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1036 - 7:55 P.M.~.S.T.),. Upon application of Verna LaColla, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (b), for permission to retain a roof sign and side wall sign. Location of property: north side Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded north by J. LaColla Est., east by J. LaColla Est., south by Main Road, west by J. LaColla Est. Fee paid $5.00. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -6- February 2, 1967 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and noticeto the applicant. THECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of'this application? VERNALaCOLLA: Me, I am Verna LaColla. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you have anything to add to this? VERNA LaCOLLA: They1 are part of the building. They are built' right on the building. I don't see why they should have to come off. TMR.~CPL~IRMAN: Itseems to me several years ago that when we granted the pizza sign, the oth~sign was to come down. You have one sign on each side of the building. On the west side you have the sign that says Tavern; You have a sign projecting south that says Pizza. In addition to that you have a sign on the building, on the roof that we asked you to remove when we granted the pizza sign. VERNA LaCOLLA: I can't~eewhy it should have to come off. THECHAIRMAN: The Town Ordinance states that you can't have roof'signs. You are permitted ground signs and wall signs. VERNA LaCOLLA: Just across the bridge from us ....... THE CHAIRMAN: We are aware of other situations. VERNA LaCOLT.%: They have three signs. THE CHAIRMAN: We are talking about your signs, and they ara-he only ones we are talking about. We are aware there are alot'of other signs in violation. They are being rectified. You will have to take the ~oof sign off and get rid of it. VERNA LaCOLLA: What constitutes a sign? MR. BERGEN: Any lettering. VERNA LaCOLLA: What if I take the lettering off it. Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- February 2, 1967 MR. BERGEN: The lettering is practically offnow. VER~I~' LaCOLLA: The kids took it off. MR. BERGEN: I thought it was from the weather. THE CHAIRMAN: The Ordinance defins a sign as "A sign includes s~E everykind of billboard, sign board, device or display, designed, arranged, used or intended to be used to advertise, announce, direct or otherwise inform, including any writing, letter, figure, symbol or mark painted upon or incorporated in the eXterior surfac~ of a building or structure." I think that'probably the Board will be willing to go along with two signs on the west end of the building and the pizza sign, providing you remove the other sign. Were you here for the other application? VERNA LaCOLLA: I spoke for~the application. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you own the property now? VEP~A LaCOLLA: Yes, I do. THE CHAIRMAN: That would be a condition that would be necessary. VERNA LaCOLLA: I already have permission for the pizza sign. That isn't on the application. THE CPiAIRMAN: I know it. When we granted the Pizza sign we specified the removal of the roof sign. Now you want the Tavern sign on the westerly side of the building. This is not an enforcement agency. We have to go on the basis of what should be done. If you don't want to remove the r,~ sign you will just be in violation. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a roof sign and a side wall sign. The Board grants permission for the tavern sign providing the applicant removes the roof sign Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- February 2, 1967 which was to be removed several years ago. The Board finds that the applicant was not the owner of the property at'the time the pizza sign was granted. The Boardpoints out-that financial harship is not an unusual or unique hardship. As to the roof sign the Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will not be served and the legally established or permitted use of r~ghborhood property and adjoining use districts will be permanently or substantially injured and the spiritofthe Ordinance wil~ not be observed. As to the side wall sign the Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice Will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantiallyinjured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it wa s BESOLVED that Verna LaColla, Main Road, Southold~ New York, be granted permission to retain a side wall sign on property located on the north side of Main Road, Southold~ New York, p~oviding the roof sign at the same premises is removed within 60 days. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be granted for'one year only~ renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall he subject~to all subsequent changes in theSouthold Town Zoning Ordinance as it'applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr.H~lse~ Far. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1037 - 8:05 P.F~-i~E.S.T.)', Upon application of Jack Levin, Sound View Avenue, Southold, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain a directional sign for the Greenporter Motel on the property of Mitchell Pekunka. Location of property: east side Main Road, Arshamomaque, New York, lot number 196 in Amended Map A of Peconic Bay Estates. Fee paid $5°00. Southold Town Board of'Appeals February 2, 1967 The Chairman opened the hearing by'reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanyied by a letter of permission from the property owner where the sign is located. Is there anyone present to be heard in favor of this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone-present who wishes to speak against'this application? (TheMe was no response. ) MR. HULSE: This sign falls within the catagory of those in the interest of thet~avelling public. After investigation and inspection the Bo~rd finds that the applicant request permission to retain a directional sign on the property of Mitchell Pekunka. Said owner of property has given permission for the location of said sign on his property. The sign in question gives directions to a Motel and the Board points out that such a sign is in the interest of the travelling public. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally~established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit'of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that Jack Levin, Sound View Avenue, Southold, New York, be granted permission to retain a directional sign on the property of Mitchell Pekunka as applied for, subject tothe following conditions: 1. The sign shall be granted for one year only~ renewable annually upon written application to the ~oard of Appeals. 2.._The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the $outhold Town Building ZoniBg Ordinance as it applies to signs. Southo~d Town Board of Appeals -10- February 2, 1967 Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1038 - 8:15 P.M. CE.S. To), Upon application of Tidewater'Oil Company, Grand Blvd. & Covert 'Lane, Westbury,~ New York, a/c Harry Bubb Service Station, Main Road, Greenport~ New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article IV~ Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. Locatinn of property: north side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by Village Property~ east by J. Rutkowski, south by Main Road, west by Walter Twardowski. Fee apid $5.00 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper~ and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: According to the Building Inspector all the miscellaneous signs have been removed from this station. Is There anyone present to speak for this applicatimn? W. TER~UNE: I do. I em here in the~ompany's interest ~o indicate that~we are interested in the signs. We will try to conform. THE CHA$~_%N: It appeared to us.~ thatthe sign was probably within the property line. Do you know how far it is? W. TERHUNE: No, I don't. I don't have any record of a sur~ey. THE CHAIRMAN: Does the same situation apply to the other stations, you don't have any surveys? W. TERHUNE: We may have one on Love's Station. As to Mr. Cohne, we moved the sign because it appeared to be in the highway. THE CHA~: The property line has to be ~stablished. As nearly as we could figure out from questioning the Building Inspector, the sign is j~st in the line Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- February 2, 196'7 W. TERHI/AIE: I went by Mr. Terry's figure for the property line. THE CHAIRMAN: The pole line is usually four feet in from the property line. MR. HULSE: Not in that area. When they res~rfaced the road the State didn't.want to buy any property so they moved the poles rightup to the property line. They moved those poles about one foot from the property line. I imagine Harry is about the same. THE CHAIRMAN: 'Ne don't want you to move the sign if you don't have to. MR. HULSE: If they move it'back it will be in the driveway. THE C-HA~q~N:~We have no authority to grant a sign over- .hanging Stat~ property. Ail of these lines should be set exactly. We could settle this by stating you had tojbe back five feet from the property line. Then the Tidewater'Circle would not be overhanging theproperty. If you were two and half feet back ........ W. TERHUNE: The circle is six feet in diameter. There is room between our sign and the pole itself, which would be four feet going about'the line of thought. MR. BERGEN: There is no other place to put the sign. As long as it is on their own property, I would say let it goo THE CHAIRMAN: You set a precedent if part:of the sign is overhanging the property line. MR. HULSE: When the were fixing the road an engineer told me mysign was overhanging the property line and we moved it back. I would imagine if Harry was over the line they would have told him too. THE CHArRMAN: Maybe we should postpone this until we find out where the line is,~ MR. HULSE: We could grant it with the condition that no part of the sign over hangs the property line. THE CHAIRMAN: 'We could require three feet back from the property line. Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- February 2, 1967 W. TERHUNE: That would be sufficient. MR. HULSE: Three feet-would ~ive you leadway. THE CHAIRMAN: If this sign is on the property line they will have to move it back. Is the~e anyone present-who Wishes to speak agains this applicatien? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a p~e sign with insufficient setbackfrom the property line. The Board finds that if the sign was setback any further it would be in the driveway of the station and hazardous to traffic using the facilit~S of the service station. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be ~Yw~ served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanentlyor substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED That~Tidewater Oil Company, Grand Blvd. &-Covert Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Harry Bubb-Service Station, Main Road, Greenport, New York, be granted permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback~from the property line as applied for on property located on the south Side Mah Road, Greenport, New York, subject to the following conditions: ~ign 1. The/shall be located at-least three (3) feet from an~ property tine. 2. No part of the sign shall overhang State property. 3. The sign shall be granted for one year, renewable annually upon written application to~the Board of Appeals. 4. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes;- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- February 2, 1967 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1039 - 8:20 P.M.~.'S,T~), Upon application of TidewaterOil Company, Grand Blvd. & Covert -Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Lou Griffin Service Station, Pacific~Street and Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permissionto retain a ple sign with insufficient setback from the property line. Location of property: Sound Avenue and Pacific Street Mattituck, New York, bounded north bySound Avenue, east by Pacific Street,°south by Rolfes & Mason, west by Long Island Railroad. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice ~ the applicant. MR. BERGEN: This particular sign, I wouldn't be surprised if it was all clear of the line. It definitely does not over- hang the property line. W. TERHUNE: It appears to be within the p~pertY line. THE CHAIRHAN: The State Inspection Sign should be turned around. W. TERHUNE: I will speak to Mr. Griffin about that. THECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ~(There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant request permission to retain a pole sign with insuffic~nt~set~ack from the property line. The Board is in agreementwith the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served.and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordir~nce will be obse~ed. Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- February 2, 1967 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Hr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that TidewaterOil Company, Grand Blvd. ~ CovertLane, Westbury, New York, ~ a/c~Lou Griffin Service Station, Pacific Street and Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, be granted permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback as applied for. This permission is granted subject to.the follo~ng conditions: 1. The sign shallbe located at least three feet from any property line. 2. No part of the sign shall overhang public property. 3. 'The sign shall be granted for one year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 4. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse , Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1040 - 8:35 P.M.~.S.T.), Upon application of Tidewater Oil Company~ Grand Blvd. &~Covert~Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Love's Service Station, Main Road & Maratooka Road, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to retain pole signs with insufficient setback from the property line. Location of property: south side Main Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north byMain Road, east by Maratooka-Road, soUth by:C.H. Wickham, and J. Sobrieray, west by Sunset Ave. Fee ~id $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice Of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: What is the situation there now. W. TERHUNE: We had one building sign and that.was removed . We had two pole signs and one was removed. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -15- February'2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: The sign on the northwest corner of the property, it may be five feet back from the Main Road. part I was in doubt about whether it was five feet back from SunsetAvenue. W. TERHUNE: There is no overhang as to that sign. THE CHAIRFa%/~: But I~was in doubt about whether it was five feet from Sunset~Avenue. This is a difficult situation. Actually you don't know whether it is or not? W. TERHUNE: I ~on't know. THE CHAIRMAN: The sign should be five feet from the corner. MR. HULSE: I agree. THE CHAIRMAN: The sign should be five feet from any property line. MR. BERGEN: You should put it right in line with the island. W. TERHUNE: If you deem it necessary we could move it to the island. THE CHAIRMAN: You wouldn't lose anything by putting it in ~ne with the island. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response. ) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission tO retain a pole sign with · nsuffmcment setback from the property line. The Board finds that even if this pole sign was located five feet from both roads it wauld still be a traffic hazard. The Board denies permission for the existing pole sign, and grants permission for the pole sign to be placed the same distance from the Main Road as the gas pumps. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will not bez~served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will ~be permanently or substantially injured Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- February 2, 1967 and the spirit of the Ordinance will not be observed. On'motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that Tidewater Oil Company, Grand Blvd. &'-Covert Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Love's Service Station, Main Road and Maratooka ~oad, Mattituck, New York, be denied permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback as applied for. The applicant may relocate the pole sign so that it is the same distance from the Main Road as the gas pumps. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1041 - 8:30 P.M.~E.S.T.), Upon application of Tidewater Oil Company, Grand Blvd. & Covert Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Mullen Motors Service Station~ Main Road, Southold, New York , for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to retain an on premises pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. Location of property: south side Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded nor th by Main Road, east by R. Glover, south by'D. Finne, west by Cottage Place. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of ~earing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: What isthe situation on that pole sign~ 'W. TERHUNE: From ~bfat I can see it is quite a distance from the property line. THE CHAIRMAN: That sign isn't on a corner. W. TERHUNE: It is centered with the property. MR. GRIGONIS: If it was any closer it would obstruct getting to the gas pumps. W. TERHUNE~ The sign appears to be back from the Main Road. MR. BERGEN: We can do the same thing wed id with the others. It should be three feet.back and not overhang the property line. I think he has plenty of clearance there. Southold Town Board of Appeals -17- Febr, uary 2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that'the applicant requests permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback fromtheproperty line. The Board finds that if the sign was setback any further it would obstruct traffic using the facilities of the service station. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will~ permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Tidewater'Oil Company, Grand Blvd. · Covert Lane, Westbury, New York, a/c Mullen Motors Service Station, Main Road, Southold, New York, be granted permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from theproperty line as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be located at least three feet from any property line. 2. No part of the sign shall overhang State property. 3. The sign shall be granted for one year only, renewable annually upon written application tothe Board of Appeals. The sign shall be subject to all Subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Fir. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -18- February 2, 1967 PUBLIC HEAR'LNG: Appeal No. 1042 - 8:40 P~M.,(E.S.T.), Upon application of'Walter Sledjeski~ a/c Porky's Restaurant, North Road, Greenport, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection ~a), for permission to retain an on premises ground sign with insufficient setback from' theprop~rty line, and insufficient height from ground level. Location of property: north side North Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by W~Sledjeski, and M.. Kujawski, east byW. Sledjeski,-~south by Main Road, west by Sound Road. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official ne~spaper~ and notice tothe applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? MR. BERGEN: I will speak for it in 'this respect, I under- stand that they had the Lighting Company move the pole back'on his property. There isn't any~other place to put this sign. It is protected by this pole. MR. HULSE: It wouldn't be. ~isible any other place. There are trees on the other end of the property. THE CHAIRMAN: The building pre-existed zoning and so did the bank that~was built there at the time the building was put there. MR. HULSE: For the record, the reason Mr.~ Sledjeski isn't here is because he is in Florida. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection- the Board~finds that the applicant requests permission to retain an on premises identification sign with insufficient-setback from the property line and insufficient height from ground ~ vel. The Board,finds that the sign is protected by a utility pole which is placed in front of it. There is notother feasible location for the sign other than its present location. Southold Town Board of Appeals -19- February 2~ 1967 The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established use of permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ord/nance will be observed. On motion by Far. Hulse, seconded by blt. Bergen, it~was RESOLVED that Walter Sledjeski, d/b/a Porky's Restaurnat, North Road, Greenport, New York~ be granted permission to retain an on premises ground sign with insufficient setback from the property line and insufficient height from gronnd level as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be gmanted for one year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. ~Hulse, Mr. Gri$onis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 10~3~- 8:50 P.M.~E.~S.'~o), Upon applicationof Esso Standard Qil COmpany, 303 S. Sendecor Avenue, Bayport, New York, a/c John BerryService Station, Main' Road, Southold, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Qrdinancd, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to retain an on premises pole sign With insufficientsetback from theproperty line. Loc a~on of property: north side Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded north by Southold Fire Dept.~ east by~Pemberton, south~by Main Road, west~by'Southold Fire Dist. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearingby reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of the hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -20- February 2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone presentwho.wishes to speak for this application~ (There was no response.) ~HE'CHAIRFaa_N: I will speak for it. This sign is in the best location possible on this property. Itis pro~ected from the Main Road by a guy wire and telephone pole. It is protected from the Fire Department by a fence. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyonepresent to-speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from theproperty line. It is .the opinion of the Board that the present location of ~e sign is the best possible location for the sign on this property. If the sign was setback further on the property it would obstruct traffic using the facilities of the service station'. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will'be observed. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigor~s,it was RESOLVED that Esso Standard Oil Company, 303 S. Sendecor ~venue, Bayport, New York , a/c John Berry. Service Station, Main Road, Southold, New York, be granted permission toretain a pole sign with insufficient setb~k from the property-line as'apPlied for. This permission is granted subject'to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be granted for one year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject to all subsequentchanges in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-~ir. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen -Mr. Hu-lse, Mr. Grigor~s. Southold Town Board of Appeals -21-- February-2, 1967 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1044 - 9:00 P.M.~(E.E.T.), Upon application of Helen Houlis, East Marion, New York,~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinate, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain an off premises directional sign on the land of Cherepowicz. Location of property: south side Main Road, East Marion, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Cherepowicz~ south by J. Rohde, west by~'Shipyard Lane. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman.opened'the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in t~e official newspaper, and notice to the appticmnt. THE CHA~: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response. ) THE CHA~: Is there anyone present who wishes tospeak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and i~pection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain an off premises directional sign. The applicant is in the hotel business. The Board points out'that such sign is in the interest of the travelling public. The Board wishes to point out-that the land on which this sign is maintained should be improved in the interest of the applicant. The Board finds that the public convenience and~lfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. GillisPie, seconded by ~r. Bergen, it was RESOLVED Helen Houlis, d/b/a Rhodes Pavillion, Bay Avenue, East~Marion, New York, be granted permission to retain a directional sign on the property of Cherepowicz as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- February'2, 1967 1. The sign shall be no larger 'than four (4)-feet by SiX (6) feet. 2. The sign shall be located-at least five feet from any property line. 3. The sign shall be located at least-three feet from ground level. 4. The sign shall be granted for one year only, renewable annualty'upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 5. The sign. shall be subject-to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. GrigD/%is. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1045 - 9:15 P.M.~CE.S.T.), Upon application of Martin Wu~rstlin,~King and First-Streets, New Suffolk, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection for permission to retain an on premises sign with insufficient setback. Locationof property: south east side King Street and First-Street, New Suffolk, New York, bounded north by King Street, east by Peconic Bay, south by F. Linder,~est by First Street. Fee paid $5100. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal ntoice of hearing, the affidavit attesting to its publiCation in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak for this application? MARTIN WUERSTL/_N: Did you see the sign? THE CHAINMAN: Yes. The one you are applying for is on pipes? " MA~TINW~ERSTLIN: Yes. It-is within my pr'opert~-line, but not five feet back. Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- February 2, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: It is attached to the building. It is as close.as you can get it. What is the other sign you are referring to? MARTIN WUERSTLIN: That was a~eight by six ground sign that was partly over the road and I did remove it. THE-CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone presentwho wishes to speak against this application? .(There was no responses) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain an on premises sign with insufficient setback. The Board is in agreement with the reason~of~application. The applicant has removed a emght~Sy six,round s~gn, replacmng it with a sign two feet by two feet,H~3~ attached to the building and as far back from the highway as possible. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts wilt not be permanently or substantially injured and the spiritrof the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by'Fir. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that Martin Wuerstlin, King and First Street, New Suffolk, New ¥ork,'~m~ be granted permission to retain an on Premises!~isign with insufficient setback as applied for.~.This permissi6n is granted subject to the following conditions. 1. The sign shall be granted for one year, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subjedt to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town. Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. VOte of the Board: Ayes:- M_r. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr..H~.lse,'Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- February" 2, 1967 PUBLIC P~ARING: Appeal No. 1046 - 9:30 P.M. (E.S.T.), Upon application of Florence Ziegler, a/c Coz~e Cove Cottages and Motel:~, Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10~ for permission to retain an off premises directional sign on the property of Cherepowicz. Location of property: south side Main Road, East Marion, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by' Cherepowicz, south by J. Rohde, west by S~pyard Lane. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a spedal exception, legal notice of hearing, the affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak for this application? MRS. ZIEGLER: We do. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you have more than one sign? MRS. ZTRGLER: We only have one off premises sign. THE-~E~/%IRMAN: On the violation, notice I persume the building inspector is referring to the experimental sign on BayA~enue. The sign looks like it needs' painting. ARe you going to paint it? MRS. ZIEGLER: Yes. THE CHAIRMAN: Around the bottom or'the sign it needs straighten up. There are alot of beer cans around there. In your own interest you should chop down the weeds. MR. ZXEGLER: He will take care of that. THE CHAIRMAN: Who will take care of it? MR. ZIEGLER: Mr. Cherepowicz. THE CHAIRMAN: He .lives on the same corner. MRS. EIRGLER: It allah.has to be done over. THE CHAI~: The sign was knocked down once. Who knocked it down? $outhold Town Board of Appeals -25- February 2, 1967 MRS. ZIEGLER: The kids. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain an off premises directional sign. The Board points out that the applicant is in the motel business and also rents cottages, and said sign is in the interest of the travelling public. The Board agrees with the reasoning of the application and points out that the property on which the sign is located should be improved. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will served, and the legally established or permitted use of nieghbo~hood property ~ and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Florence Ziegler, d/b/aCozee Cove Cottages and Motel, Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York, be granted permission to retain an off premises directional sign on the property of Cherepowicz as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign shall be at leastfive (59 feet from any property line. 2. The sign shall be at least three 9) feet above ground level. 3. The sign shall be no larger than four i~4) feet by six iC6) feet. 4. The sign shall be granted for one year only, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 5. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, HLSse, Fir. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- February 2, 1967 PUBLIC ~.%RING: Appeal No. 1047 - 9:40 P.~M.'i~E..S.T.), Upon application of'Charles Mills, a/c The Idle Hour, Village Lane, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning'Ordinance, Article IV,Section 408~ Subsection (b), for permission to retain an on premises sign. Location of property: west sideVillage Lane, Orient, New York, bounded north by Y.W. Young, east by Village Lane, south by Paul Wasilewski, west by H.C. Tabor. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper~ and notice ~ the applicant. MR.~ HULSE: How big is the sign? MR. GIT.?.ISPIE: It is approximately three feet by five feet. Is there anyone present to speak in favor of this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak against this application? (There was no response.) MR. BERGEN: I am in favor of him having a sign, but not a sign that says "Coca Cola". THE CHAIRMAN: The sign shaid advertise the business conducted on the premises. This is one of the business conducted on the premises. MR. HULSE: This isn't~necessary. He doesn't just sell coca col~. THE'CHAIRMAN: The Board has authority to specifywhat is on a sign. MR. HULSE: The sign should define what he is. After investigation and inspectinn the Board finds that the applicant request permission to retain a hanging sign. The Board grants permission for a hanging sign in lie~ of'a ground sign. A gound sign would be undesirable at this location because of the reduced front yard area and traffic going in and out of-'the post office adjoining this property would Southold Town Board of Appeals -27- February ~ 1967 create a traffic hazard. A condition of granting permission for a sign structure to remain is that the applicant advertise his own business and not the 'boca cola" business. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will berserved and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property'and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance Will be observed. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr, Bergen, it~was RESOLVED that-Charles Mills, a/cT he Idle Hour, Village Lane, Orient, New York, be granted permission to retain an on premises hanging sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall advertise his own business and not the "Coca Cola" business, and the applicant shall comply with this condition within 60 days. 2. The sign shall be granted for one year,, renewable annually upon written application tothe Board of Appeals. 3. The sign shall be gubject to all subsequent changes in the SoutholdTown Building Zone Ordinance as it applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1048 - 9:30 P.~F~'~.'S.T.), Upon application of Ed's Sign Serive, a/c FredKaelin, Main R'oad~3 Cutchogue, New York, for a special exception in accordance ~ith the Zoning Ordinance~ Article IV, Section 408~ Subsection for permission to~ect a wall sign. Location of property: south~ sdde Main Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by-Land now or formerly of H.S. Hand, south by~Cutchogue Fire Dist., west by C.P. Tuthill. Fee paid $5.00. TheChairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -28- February-2~ 1967 Mr. Edward Purcell was present to speak for the application. Fir. Purcell drew a diagram of how the sign would be attached to the building. THE CPIAIRMAN: How many places will the sign be attached to the building. EtNFARD PURCELL: Twice. Ther~u~as a gneral discussion on the difference between a doulbe face~ sign and a s~$gle face sign. The Chairman: Is there anyone present to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that~the applicant request permission to erect a wall sign. The sign will projdct 24 inches f~om the building and read "Real Estate - Kaelin". The Board agrees with the reasoning of 'the application and points out that this is theonly feasible location for the sign. The Board also points out that~Lr. Kaelin formerly had a sign that overhang the sidewalk. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and jsutice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of n~ighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially in~ured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by bit. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Bergen,-it was RESOLVED that Ed's Sign Service, a/c Fred Kaelin, Main Road, Cutchogue~ Newt York~ be gr'anted permissionto erect a wall sign as applied for. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The' Sign shall be granted for one year Giy, renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. 2. The sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it' applies to signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, bit. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigonis. Southold Town Board of~Appeals -29- February 2~ 1967 Mr. Robbins appeared before the Board to further discuss-his directional sign. He stated that he may be able to place hissign at Kimogenor Point. The Board advised him that this may be feasible, however he would have to obtain a letter of permission ~z~ from the property owner. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 PjM.~, Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office~ Main Road~ Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing, ~w~l~ Pursuant to Section 267, Subdivision 6 of the TownLaw of the State of New York, on the Board's motion, a rehearing on Appeal number 1006, upon application of Kyrillos Charalambides, 1550 Central Drive, Mattituek, New York~ for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 6,~Article VII, Section 703, for permission toretain an accessory building in the front yard area. Locationof property: north side Central Drive, lot number 79, in Capt. Kidd Estates, Mattituck, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by'Mr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. HulSe, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:~45 P.M., Thursday, February 16, 1966, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon applicationof John B. Griffin, 36Baltimore Avenue, Massapequa, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III~ Section-307~ for permission to construct~a dwelling with insufficient side yard area. Location of property: east side Knollwood Lane~ Mattituck~ New York, bounded north byWallace Monsell, east by Salvatore Siracusano, south by land now or formerly of Max and Betty'Lowenhardt, west by Knollwood Lane. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL Southold Town Board of Appeals -30- February 2, 1967 On. motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by'Fir. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:00 P.M.~ Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Howard C. and Matilda Bigg, Haywaters Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue~ New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Articte X, Section 1000A, for per- mission to set off a parcel of land with insufficeint frontage and area. Location of property: north east side Hay~aters Road, Nasaau Point, Cutchogue, New 'fork, lot number 27, Peconic Bay Properties, Inc. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was -RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:10 P.M.~ Thursday, February 16, 1967, at theTown Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of William Beebe, New Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue, New York, for recognition of access in accordance with the State of New York TOwnLaw, Section 280A. Location of property: south side Wilson Landing and Wilson Road,-Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Wilson Landing, east by land of applicant, south by landof Moeller, west by Eugenes Creek. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Bergen, i t-was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:20 P.M.~ Thursday, February 16~ 1967, at theTOWn Office, M~n Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of h~ing upon application of Lefferts P. Edson, Esq., 51755 Main Road, Southold,. New York, a/c Mary'Elizabeth Goetschius and Others, for recognition of access in accordance with the State of New York Town Law, Section 280A.. Location of t~roperty: private right of way off east side'Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Miller's Right of way, east by George A. Hammond, south byMattituck Creek, west by land now or formerly ofW. H. Wertenberg. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- all Southold Town Board of Appeals -31- February 2, 1967 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen,. it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:35 P.M,.(E.S.T.), Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of H.M. Demarest &-Sons, Main Road, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 1003 A, for permission to use existing labor camp buddings to house farmhelp. Location of property: north side Narrow River Road, Orient, New York, bounded north by F.J. Miller and others, east by George L. Edwars Est., south by Narrow River Road, west by land now or formerlyof Gettinger-Freemann. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by bit. Girgonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 8:45 P.M.'~(E.S.T.)', Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town ~ficei~Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time andplace ofhearing upon application of George Ahlers, Cutchogue, New York, a/cEdward Miller, 19 Marshall Avenue, Floral ~Park, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300~ Subsection 6, for permission to erect a private detached garage in the front yard area. Location of property: Arshamomaque Avenues, Southold ,New York, lot number 14, Beixedon Estates, Southold, New York. vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL seconded On motion by FLr. Hulse, w~-~ by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Boar d of Appeals set 9:00 P.M. , Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of John A. ~ywoda, Main Road and Hobart Road, Southold, New York, for a special ex ception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV,~ Section 408, Subsection (b), for permissiDn to retain on premises wall signs. Location of property: south west corher of Main Road and Hobart Road, Southold, New York~ boundednorth by Main Road, east by Hobart Road, South by'Thomas Murtagh, west by ~ames Warmaka. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL Southold Town Board of Appeals -32- February 2, 1967 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mro Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:20 PeM.~(E.S.T~), Upon application of Sound Shore Motel and Sound View Restaurant, Greenport, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, SeCtion 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain the following signs: 1) a directional sign located on the north west corner of Main Road and Chapel Lane, Greenport, New York, bounded north byJack-Levin, east by DhapelLane, south by Main Road, west by Long Island Lighting Co.; 2) a directional sign on the north side Main Road, Greenpprt, New York, bounded north by J. Brandi, east by A. Straussner, south by Main Road, west by Kzsyminski; 3) a directional sign on the north east side Main Road and Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded north by~C. Ee Cochran, ~t by Alex Komskis, south by Main Road, west by Boisseau Avenue. Vote of.the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by ~lr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:45 P.M., Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Peter School, Inc., 431West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/c Joe's Garage,' Main Road, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), forpermission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from theproperty line.. Location of propemty: north side Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded north by Russell Tabor, east by Russell Tabor, south by Main Road, west by Harry Terry Est. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ~LL O motiQn n ~x~ by Mr. Hulse, seconded by F Lt. Gillispie, it was S RESOLVR~ that the Southold Town Board of Appmls set 9:55 P.'M.~E.S.T.), Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place ofhearing, upon application of Peter School, Inc.,43 West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/cAlbert Schwicker Est., Main Road~ Mattituck, New York~ for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection A, for permission to Southold Town Board of-Appeals -33- February 2F 1967 retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. Locati°n of property: South side Main Road~ Mattituck, New York, bounded north by'Main Road, east by Mattituck School Prop., south-by. John Pylko, west by Ralph Cox. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeal set ~ 10:00 P.M. iCE.H~T), Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Peter Scholl, Inc.,. 43 West 10th Street, HuntingtonStation, New York, a/cAverette Service Station, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a special exception in accordance wi~h the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section~408, Subsection A, for permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient-setback ~rom the property line..~ Location of property: south side Main~Road, Southold, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Youngs Avenue, south byMary Goubeaud, west by T. Frohnho~fer. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Grigon~, it was RESOLVED thatthe Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 10:10-P.M.~, Thursday,. February 16, 1967~ at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, ~s the time and place of hearing upon application of~Chevron Oil Company, 1200state Street, Perth Amboy, New-Jersey, a/c~Cherry,s Service Station, Main Road~ Southold, NewYork, for a specialexception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV,.Section 408, Subsection A, for permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. Location of property: Main and Bayview Road, Southold, New York, bounded north by Main Road and Bayview Road, east by Bayview Road, south by Jose dePaz, west by Main Road, Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL Southold Town Board of Appeals -34- February 2~ 1967 On motion by'Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of 'Appeals dated January 5, 1967 be approved as submitted. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- all On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED that the minutes ofthe Southold Town Board of Appeals dated January 19, 1967, be approved as submitted. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals will be held at the Southold Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, on February 16, 1967, Thursday, at 7:30 P.M. Themeeting was adjourned at 11;00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ~.~¢~ ~ Barbara Dittmann, Secretary  uthold Town Board ~ Appeals