Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-02/16/1967-- Southold Town ard SOUTHOLO, L. I., N.. Telephone SO 5 g660 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert '~/. Gillispie, Jr., Chairmdn Robert Bergen Charles Ciregonis, .Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hufse, Jr. MI'NUTE S SQUTHOLD TOWN B6~RD ~F ~APPEALS February 16, 1967 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, February 16, 1967, at the Town Office, MainRoade Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert Giltispie, Jr., Chairman; Robert Bergen, Fred Hulse, Jr. Absent: Messrs: Charles Grigonis, Jr., Serge Doyen, Jr. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1006 - 7:30 P.M.', Pursuant to' Section 267, Subdivision 6 of the Town Law of the State of New York, on the Board's motion, a rehearing on Appeals number 1006, upon application of Kyrillos'Charalambides, 1550 Central Drive, Mattituck, New York, for avariance in accord_ance with the Zoning ~rdinance, Article IIIa Section 300, Subsection 6, Article VII, Section 703, for permis~on to retain an access~y building 'in the front yard area. Location of property: north side-Central Drive, 10t number 79~ in Capt. Kidd Estates~ Mattituck, New York. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2-- February 16, 1967 THE CHA/RMAN: This is a rehearing on an appeal which was acted on by the Board of Appeals on January 5, 1967~ the application was dated December 1, 1966~ in which the Board denied permission for a garage in the front yard area. We will re-read the action of the Board. "After investigation and inspection the Board f~ds that the appellant requests permission to re- tain an accessory building in the front yard area. More specifically the accessory building in question is a private garage. The Board finds that the hard- ship involved in this case is a self imposed hardship. The appellant had an attached garage on the dwelling and he chose to incorporate this as part of the living space. It is the opinion of the Board that the appellant created the hardship and a self imposed hardship can not be considered by thie Board as a legal hardship. "The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will not produce practical difficulties or unnecessaryhardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by all properties ali~e in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does not observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will change the character of the district." TheCHAIRMAN: We don't know what youmay have to present, however, we wanted to give you an apportunity to be heard. AT~XANDER CHASE, ESQ.: The reason for the request for the rehearing, apparently by the decision of'the Board, certain facts, the most crucial fact, was not a fact. That the appellant, Mr. Charalambides, when he took title and possession of the subject premises, there was no attached garage on the premises at that time. Therefore, any decision on the basis of him having created his own hardships imposed his own hardship, is not a fact, and a conclusion that the Board would draw from that fact would not necessarily fOllow. THE CHAIRMAN: When he bought the premises there was an attached garage? ALEXANDER CHASE, ESQ.': No, there was no garage. Southold Hown Board of Appeals -3- February 16, 1967 MR. HULSE: The garage was incorporated in the house when he bought it. THE CF~IRMAN: I don't question the fact the garage was R~Y.~w~an intrigate part of the house. I think the Board acted on the basis of the fact that no building permit was obtained, whihh in itself is no great crime, then to apply for a ~w~ew~ variance and not obtaining a building permit. We rarely grant garages in the front yard area. ALEXANDER CHANE, ESQ.: This is a personal matter with me. Fir. Charatbides is my father. I have personal knowlege of the facts. THE CHAIRMAN: Why didn't he. obtain a building permit? w?.RFJ~NDER CHASE, ESQ,-: He entrusted this to the builder. Thiss was the only way the garage could be put on the property from the topography of the property itself. He said go ahea~ and build it. It was built and he pa!ed for it. THE C~: There does not have to be a garage on the property. No one gHarantees when you buy property that you can erect a garage/ ALEXANDER CHASE, ESQ.: I understand that. He wanted a garage to get his car off the street. ~ He didn't in any way, or doesn't want to act in any unlawful way. THE CHAIRMAN: I am sure that the Board isn't insulted because you didn't apply for a budding permit first. We would deny it even if he had applied for it. ALEXANDER CHASE~. ESQ.': Perhaps there is a reason to allow the garage. The Captain Kidd Estates was originallybuilt as pretty much a summer colony. I k~ow they ~ave as a fact in the last ~en years there has been a change in Captain'Kidd Estate~in that the po~ple are starting to retire and I would say~at. 20 per' cent of the owers of the property have occupancy for the full 12 months. I think the Board would agee with me there is certainly no disgrace in what has been done by the owners in Captain Kidd-Estate. They have converted summer homes~ addded to them. They are people Who come out from the city, have speneded money with prid~ and dignity in there homes. They have kept them up. ~he addition of certain rooms, and a garage in this case, this area here is raised up. Southold Town Board of'Appeals -4- February 16~ 1.9~7 THE CHAIRMAN: We have all seen the garage. ALEXANDER CHASE',' ESQ.: There was no other way to place the garage other 'than the front yard area. I might~point-out that the house immediately to the East, owned by Mr. Abatelli~ is on a hill. It doesn't interfere with his vision. There is no complaint on- that end. As far as it jutting out to far on this end we are aware of that. As far as aesthetic there is no harm done. THE CHAIRMAN: Speaking of the physical setback of the garage when he backs out onto the street, which is something that-we .......... ALEXASTDER CHASE, ESQ.: He canback the car out of the garage and there is about five to eight feet between the road way and the car. He has a 1963 Buick. THE CHAIRMAN: If the permit had been granted, we would try to arrange it so that the applicant doesn't backout. We try to keep them in the back yar area so an applicant can backout on his own property. These thing s are irrelevant. ALEXANDER CHASE, ESQ.: I wish that the proper.steps had been taken for a building permit. THE C~: We are not offended by that. Some of the builders are offended by the red tape of the Zoning Ordinance. We try not to be influenced one way or the other. I think'the things you have presented have minified the offense as far as your father is concerned. AT~XANDER' CHASE, ESQ.: The garage had been incorpxated into the living area when he took title to theproper~. MR. HULa,E: You inherited this with the property. ~ER CHASE, ESQ.': The Board specificallypointed out that he brought the hardship on himself. This was not the ~ase here. I do r~ize there are other-,facts. We won't suffer any financial hardship if it was torn down, but-we would like it to remain. Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- February 16~ 1967 The Chairman re-read the action of %he Board of the Appeals on the case in question. CHASE, ESQ.: He never had an attached garage. THE CHA/I~4AN: That state merit offact was incorrect and will be corrected in the record now. It is correct as fact the previQus owner cre~ted conditions that your father bought, and that is were the self imposed hardship comes in. Continu~ing with the action - It is the opinion of the Board that the appellant created the hardship and a self imposedhardship can 'not be considered by this Board as a legal hardship. ~ER C~ASE, ESQ.: He did not create the hardship, he bought the hardship. THE CHAIRMAN: I think the Board is willing to amend the action. ALEXANDER CHASE, ESQ.: Iam askingthe Board with the facts ~s they are to make a decision. THE CHAIRMAN: So far as I am concerned~ I am~sorry for this predic&ment, particularly sorry that your father spend this money. What you have said will not change my. opinion or the validity of the decision. MR% HULSE: I agree. MR. BERGEN: We would set a precedent. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything luther? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requested~.a rehearing on appeal number 1006, in view of the fact certain facts in the original decision were incorrect. The Board finds that the applicant did not have an attached garage at the time he bought the property in question. The garage had already been incorporated into the living area of the ~lwelling by the previous owner. However~ the applicant was aware-of the fact there was no garage on the premises and the location of the present garage built by the present owner does not'observe the spirit of the Ordinance. The applicant would be backing out onto a public highway and thus creating a traffic hazard. The location of the present garage does not conform with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -6- February 16, 1967 The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not unique and would be shared by ~all properties alike in the immediate vicinity~of.this property and in the same use district; and the variance does not observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Hulse~ seconded by Mr. Bergen, it~was RESOLVED that Kyrillos Charalambides, 1550 Central Drive, Mattituck, New York, be denied permission to retain an accessory building in the front yard area on property l~cated on the north side'Central Drive, lot number 79, in Capt. Kidd Estates, Mattituck, New York. The original order of the Board of Appeals for the removal of the garage shall be carr~.d out. Vo~e of the Board : Ayes:- Mr. Gitlispir, Mr. Bergen, ~ir. Huls$. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1049 - 7:45 P.M.i~E.S.T.)~ Upon application of John B. Griffin, 36 Baltimore Avenue, Massapequa New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 307, for permission to construct a dwelling with insufficient side yard area. Location of property: east side Knollwood Lane, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by -Wallace Monsell, east by Salvatore Siracusano, south by land now or formerly of Max and Betty Lowenhardt, west by Knollwood Lane. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: How deep is the lot? JOHN GRIFFIN: 201 feet on one side and 168 feet'on the other side. THE CPL%IRMAN: What is the proposed locat~ of the house? JOHN GRIFFIN: I would have to have a front variance on that to gert hat house in there. Southold Town Board of Appeals -7- February 16, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: You are just asking for a side yard variance. The dimensions of the entire new construction is 86 feet, one inch by 39 feet, se~en inches. Our Ordinance requires ten feet on one side and fifteen feet on the other side.. It can be either way. Sometimes we vary the 25 feet and permit to go go closer on one side. ·his Particular application, from w~we can see, you are building a house that is too big for the lot. We had a fellow who had a 100 foot lot and came in here with plans for a 90 foot house. He had flat property and no topography problem. In this case we would try to figure something that would help you. I think you have some sort of structure on the side of the building. JOHN GRIFFIN: There is four or five feet I could cut right'out. THE CHAIRMAN: If you would cut it down to 80½ feet you would then have 20 feet left for side yard area. The entire Zoning Ordinance takes cognizant of the fact that we can't change what took place before the Zoning Ordinance. The building inspector can reduce the side yard on certain lots. That is in the Ordinance for small undersized lots. In this case you have a lot that has plenty of area. What you are asking for is a side yard variance. If you got it down to 80~ feet you will not offend any one on this side. On the north side of yourlot you have a steep bank, and it falls from east to west toward Knollwood Lane. You will have to set the house back at least 35 feet from Knollwood Lane. The best thing to 4o here is to stay 10 feet off the southerly line. So if you are going~to encroach on any side it would be on the north side where it isopen. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? WILLIAM STARK: If my house hadn't been built close to the line it wouldn't bother me. I would want him to keep ten feet on that side. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything e3se? ~There was no response.) $outhold~Town Board of Appeals -8- February 16, '1967 After investigation and inspection~ the Board finds that the appellant requests permission to construct a dwelling with insufficient side yard-area. It is the opinion of the Board that the location of this house be permitted and the variance granted provided that-no part of the house' be any closer than 10 feet ~o the southerly line, boarded by'Stark. The projectiOn that was proposed on the side of the house will have to be eliminated. The Board finds that the lot in question has a sharp slope to the north and a sharp slope from east to west. The Board finds' that the appellant's lot is oversized~has more than the~minimum area. The Board is ~n~fluen~ed by the fact that a drainage area is immediately to the North of the lot in question, and unlikely it would be used for residential area. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the'variance does observe the spirit-of the Ordinance and will not change the Character ~of the district. On motion by Mr. Bergen~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED John B. Griffin,. 36 Baltimore Avenue, Massapequa New York,. be granted permission to erect a dwelling with insuffic~nt-side yard area on property~tocated on the east side Knollwood Lane~ Mattituck~ New York, subject to the Following conditions: 1. The house shall be located at least 10 feet from the southerly property line. 2. The house shall be located at least 35 feet from Knollwood Lane. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. Southold Town Board of Appeals -9- February 16, 1967 PUBLIC BR. ARING: Appeal No. 1050 - 8:00 Upon application ofHowardC . and Matilda Bigg~ Hap-waters Road, Nassau Point, Cutchogue, New York, for a variance, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 303, and Article X, Section 1000A, for permission to set off a parcel of land with insufficient fronta?e and area. Location of property: north side Haywaters Road, Nassau Point~ Cutchogue, New York, lot number 27, Peconic Bay Properties,. Inc. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the applicatic~ for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavitrattesting to its publication inthe official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present Who wishes to speak in favor of this application? WILLIAM-WICKHAM, ESQ.: Gentlemen, I just-want to add one thing to the petition. This is beneficial to the Town of Southold. The rest of the lots on the north side Of Hal~aters Road are cut down by erosion. You have a strip of thirty feet here were there will be no buildings at all. MR. BERGEN: There will be no buildings at all there. WILLIAM~WICKPL%M, ESQ.: That is understood. They may-want to put a bulkhead or a dock. This is a perfect place to put a boat. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present-who wishes to speak against this application? l~The~e was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to set off a parcel of land with insufficient frontage and area. The parcel of land is to be thirty feet on the road and will be used for access to Haywaters Cove. The Board is in agreement~with the reasoning of, the application and points out that this variance will improve the waterfront area. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all $outhold Town Board of Appeals -10- February 16, 1967 properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in.the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by ~ir. Hulse, it was RESOLVED Howard C. and Matilda Bigg, Haywaters Road, Nassau Point, Cutchouge, New York, be granted permission to set off a parcel of land with insufficient frontage located on the north east side Haywaters Road, Cutchogue, NewYork, subject to the following condition: 1o The new owner shall not erect any structure on this property that has been set off. This does not preclude bulkheads or docks. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1051 ~-8:10 P.M.~(E,S.T,), Upon application of William Beebe, New Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue, New York, for'regognition of access in accordance with the State Of New York Town Law, Section 280A. Location of property: south side Wilson Landing and Wilson Road, Cutchogue, New York, bounded north by Wilson Landing, east by land of applicant, south by land of Moeller, westby Eugenes Creek. Fee paid $5.00 The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for recognition of access, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. TPIECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishesto speak for this application? WTT~IAMBEEBE: We are both partners. I speak for the application? THE CH~YRMAN: This is all new land~, filled land? WILLIAM BEEBE: Much of it is. THE C~: You will have to meet the specifications that are set down by the Town for a new road. Southold Town Board of Appeals -11- February 16, 1967 WILLIAM BEEBE: We built all the other zoads in there. THE CHAIRMAN: Then you know what to do. MR. BERGEN: ~hat land ~ will have to settle for awhile. WILLIAM BEEBE: Where we are goin~ to put the road it was all up land. That is all settled. It was put in last year. THE CHAIRMAN: This right of way is for~lots she and two. Lot number three already has access. MR. HULSE: Make sure you keep the house 35 feet back from the turnaround. WILLIAM BEEBE: I don't thinkwe will have any trouble with the roads. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant requests permission to construct a right of way to serve two interior lots. The Board finds that this right of way will be built to the Town Highway specifications and there will be a 100 foot turnaround at the end of the right of way. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be share by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity~of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse~ it was RESOLVED WilliamBeebe, New Suffolk Lane, Cutchogue, New York, be granted recognition of access on property located on the Southoside of Wilson Landing and Wilson Road, Cutchogue~ New York, as shown on the survey map submitted with the application. This permission is granted subject to the following condition: Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- February 164 1967 1. This right of way shall be constructed in accozdance with the Town of Southold Highway-Specifications and subject to the final approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie,, Mr. Bergen, Mr. HUlse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal number 1052 - 8:20 Upon application of. Lefferts P. Edson, Esq., 51755 Main Roads Southold, New York, a/c MarYElizabeth Goetschius and others~ for recognition of access in accordance with the ~a~ee~-A~e~e State of New York TownLaw, Section~280A. Location of property: private right of way off east side Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Miller's Right of Way, east by George A. Hammond, south'byMattituck Creek, ~est by land now or formerly oflW. Hj Wertenberg. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the Hearing by reading the application for recognition of access, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? LEFFERTS P. EDSON~ ESQ.: The Town of Southold requires the application. THE CF=aIRMAN: Are these the remaining lots in this area? ?.MFFERTS P. EPSON, ESQ.: .It is just one parcel. THE CHAIRMAN: (indicating on survey) When we made our inspection, this is the road we came in on. (There was a discussion of the location of the right of way as shown on the survey map submitted with the application) MR. BERGEN: (indieating on survey) You want to drive in here? THE CHAIRMAN: It is such a narrow road that I was watching the drive. MR. BERGEN: If they own 'the right of way we can't give approval over it. Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- February 16, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: When we came in there was a gate at'the end of this road. As I understood the Building Inspector the road was proposed to run through here and around here. ~indicating on survey). ~HE CPIAIRMAN: There is a buffer strip on the north side of Miller's Road. (There wa~ a lenghty discussion on the question of ownership and the right to use Miller's Right of Way and particularlyDeer Path Road right of way. Mr. Edson presented a copy of a suz~ey of the property, showing the property as itwas before the proposed division.) THE CPIAIRMAN: Is there anyone-present who wishes t6 speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the appellant-requests permission to construct a right of way to be twenty~five feet wide and approximately 250 feet lon~ The Board grants permission for a private right of way at a distance of 300 feet from Miller'~Rea~- Right of way, a twenty-five foot right of way extending approximately 250 feet easterly to the premises which would give access to proposed parcel hum bet four as proposed in the survey by AldenW. Young, dated January 18, 1967. It~should be clearly pointed-out that the documents in the files do not indicate whether or not the applicant has the right'to .use the so- called Deer Path~mg~t of ~ay. There shall be at least a sixteen foot clearance for the ~assage of emergency vehicles. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce~practical difficulities~orUnnecessary hardship; the hardship created is undue and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the v~riance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. Southold Town Board of Appeals -14- February 16, 1967 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by M_ro Hulse, it was RESOLVED Lefferts P. E~son, Esq., a/cMary;Elizabeth Goetschius and Others be granted recognition of access on property located on private right of way off the east side of'Cox Neck Road, Mattituck, New York, as stated herein above, and as shown on the survey map by Alden W. Young, map dated January 18, 1967o This right of way shall also be subject to the final approval of the Southold Town Building Inspector. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulseo PUBLIC b~z. ARING: Appeal Number 1053 - 8:35 P.Mo{EoS. T.)~ Upon application of HoMo Demarest & Sons, Main Road, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Section 1003A, forpermission to use existing labor camp buildings to house farmhelp. Location of property: north sideNarrow River Road, Orient, New York, bounded north by FoJ. Miller ~-Others, east by' Geerge L. Edwards Est., south by Narrow River Road, west by land now or formerly of Gettinger-Freemann. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. T~E CHAIRMAN: The application is accompanied by a sketch~ indicating the buildings he proposes to use° Is there anyone present to speak for this application? (There was no response°) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak agains this application? (There was no response°) Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- February 16, 1967 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to use existing labor camp buildings to house farm help. The Board finds that this camp has been used at least sixteen years by the ~rmer owner and others. It has been used to house farm help both seasonal and during the entire year. The Board finds there is no police record for this camp. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On m orion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that H.M. Demarest & Sons, Main Road, Orient, New York, be granted permission to use existing labor camp buildings to house farm help on property located on the north side Narrow River Road, Orient, New York, as applied for. This permission is grante~ for a period of one (1) year. Vote ~ the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING:: Appeal No. 1054 - 8:45 P.M. (E.S.T.), Upon application of George Ahlers, Cutchogue, New York, a/c Edward Miller, 19 Marshall Avenue, Floral Park, New York, for a variance in accordance~ith the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 6, for permission to erect a private detached garage in the front yard area. Location of property: Arshamomaque Avenue, Southold, New York, lot number 14, Beixedon Estates, Southold, New Yor]~. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to ~e applicant. The applicant submitted the application on a special exception form. The Chairman added all statements that should have been included on the application. The applicant moved that all statements and facts read into the application by the Chairman, should be included in ~e application. Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- February 16, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: This lot is verynarrow. The front of the lot is 80 feet the rear is 70 feet. Other lots in the area are considerably larger. Is there anyone present to speak for this application? GEORGE AHLERS: I am-~he applicant. The house is set so far to the rear. The land falls to the creek, it would be impossible to erect a garage in the rear yard. There are several gaaages in the front yard. There is one under construction right now. We will not harmthe neighborhood, and to deny this would impose a hardship on the owner. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there~anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response. ) THE CHAIRMAN: One of the problems is to keep the garage as far ba~k as possible. We would prefer you put. this garage back 35 feet and looks like you have enough room to do that. MR. BERGEN: Is this garage going to have entrance from the highway~ GEORGE AHIERS: Straigt in from the road. We have to comply with the deed restrictions which is 10 feet from the side line. THE CHAIRFaA~: Is there anything further? i(There was no response,) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to const~Hct a private detached garage in the front yard area. The Board finds there are many other garages in the front yard area in this same neighborhood. In ge~a~al, the Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the Y~9~ variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of the district. $outhold Town Board of Appeals -17- February 16, 1967 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, ti was RESOLVED that George Ahlers, Cutchogue, New York, a/c Edward Miller, 19 Marshall Avenue, Floral Park, New York, be granted permission to erect a private detached garage in the front yard area on lot number 14,-in Beixedon Estates, Southold, New York, as applied for. This permission is subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage shall be located at least%thirty-five feet from the front property line. (road line). 2. The garage shall be located at least 10 feet from the side line. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen~ Mr. HUlse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1055 - 8:00 P.'M.(EjS. T,'), Upon application of John A. Polywoda, Main Road and Hobart Road, Southold, New York, for a special-exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection for permission to retain on premises wall signs. Location of property: south west corner of Main Road and Hobart Road, $outhold, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Hobart Road, south by Thomas Murtagh, west by James Warmaka. Fee -paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the ~appl~ation for a speical exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice ~ the applicant. TPIE C~: There is a diagram of the existing signs. Two signs are e~even feet, eight inches by eight feet, each on one wall. On the opposite wall applying fQr a sign Which will be reduced in size, a pair ten feet, six inches by feet. One on each side of the building. In other words~ the proposed signs will each be approximately 63 square feet. This makes a total of 126 square feet of sign total, on each side of this building located one'the' southwest' corner of Main Road and Hobart Avenue, Is there anyone present to speak for this application? Southold Town Board of Appeals JOHN POLYWODA: I do. February 16, 1967 THE CH~t-RM:-'You are the applicant, you own the building? JOHN POLYWODA: Right. THE'CHAIRMAN: How long is the building? JOHN POLYWODA: About 60 feet. I expect to put~ano~r 20 feet on in the next two years. MR. BERGEN: How wide is the building, about 40-feet? JOHN-POLYWODA: It is 30 feet wide. THE CHAIRMAN: You do not have a sign on the front of the building? JOHN POLYWODA: No. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you propose to put a sign ~n the f~ont of the building? JOHN POLYWODA: No. THE'CHAIRMAN: You are a distributor for'~Cotts? JOHN~POLYWODA: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: You have no ground sign? JOHN POLYWODA: No~ I don~t. THE CHAIRMAN: Do you prepose to cut these signs down to ten feet by six feet? JOHN POLYWODA: Right. sign MR. BERGEN: OneT~n each side? JOHN POLYW~DA: T~ signs on each side. TPIE'CHAIRMAN: You say the building is 60 feet long? JOHN-POLYWODA: Right. Southold Town. Board of Appeals -19~ February 16, 1967 T~E'CHAIRMAN: You could put up a sign 20 feet by 6 feet, ~raw a line down the middle of it. That is on Hobart Avenue. This one on the west side of the building is a little different in that it isn't permitted. We understand that it ~o~t do any good on the front of the building. Accordingly we permit it 'to be on the side of the building if you agree not to put a sign on the front of the building. The Board would be willing to go along with a similiar situation on the west side of the building. We would like to see~Du cut it down. 20 feet by 6 feet is a big sign. You are willing to eliminate anything from the front of the building and a ground sign? JOHN POLYWODA: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: Are you sure you need this sign on the west side of the building? JOI-]N~POLYWODA: Yes. ~ CHAIRMAN: Don't you think one ten. foot by six foot sign would be sufficient? JOHN POLIS~ODA: I think we could do it. THE CHAIRMAN: And you are reducing the size of the signs? JOHN'POLYWODA= There were eight feetby eleven feet. THE CHAIRMAn: Are there any question from any members of the Board? MR. BERGEN: Right now there are two "Pepsi Cola" signs that should be removed. JOHN POLYWODA: They are coming off. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? % (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain wall signs. The sign on Hobart Avenue shall be limited to twenty feet by six feet. The Pepsi Cola signs facing Hobart Avenue shall be eliminated. There shall be no sign on the face of the building and no ground sign. The sign on the westerly side of the building shall be no larger than ~en feet by six feet. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2 0- February 16, 1967 The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr, Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, ittwas RESOLVED John A.. Pol!~oda, Main Road and Hobart Avenue, Southold, New York, be granted permi~on to retain wall signs on property located on the southwest corner of Main Road and Hobart Avenue, Southold, New York. This permission is subject to the following conditinns: 1. This sign shall be grante~ for a period of one year, renewable annually ~pon written applicatinn to the Board~of Appeals. 2. This sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the SoutholdTown Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 3. The applicant agrees not to erect a front wall sign or a ground sign. Vote of the Board: A~es:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Huls~. PUBLIC F~.ARING: Appeal No. 1056 - 9:20 P.M.~i~E.S. To)~ Upon application of Sound Shore Motel and Sound View Restaurant, Greenport, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III,. Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain the following signs: 1) a directional sign located on the north west corner of Main Road and Chapel Lane, Greenport, b~ew York, bounded nor.th byiSack Levin, east by Chapel Lane, south by Main Road, west by Long IslandLighting Co.; 2) a directional sign on the north side Ma Road~ Greenport, New York hounded north by J. Brandi, east by A. Straussner, south by Main Road, west by Kzyminski; 3)~ a ~irectional sign on the north east side Main Road and Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded north by. C.E.-Cochran, east by'Alex~Komakis, south byMain Road, west by Boisseau Avenue. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, the legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applica~h. Southold Town Board of Appeals -21- February 16~ 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: We will take the sign at Main Road and Boisseau Avenme first. We looked at it and it appears to us the sign should be moved back North from the highway. Should be movedat least six feet from its present location, and should be at least five feet above ground level to provide visibility. You can't see past it. It is a traffic hazard were it is. The sign should also be reduced in size to four feet by six feet. Now the sign at'Chapel Lane does block visi~ there two ways. You can't see under it and you can% see past it. It is too close to the Main Road. It should be moved back at least 12 feet North from the Main Road and should be at least five feet from'Chapel Lane. As this sign is double-face it should be at an angle that is no larger than the narrowest dimension of the sign. In view of the fact there are ~wo businesses advertised on this sign the maximum dimension of the sign shall be six feet by eight feet. The~e shall b~ Eive feet from the bottom of the ~gn. Now the sign at the traffic circle. I think we should postpone decision on this sign. It would be easier to talk to the applicant than try to explain it in an action. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the hearing on Appeal number-1056, upon application of Sound Shore Motel and Sound View Restaurant, Greenport, New York, be postponed until 7:30 P.M., March 16, 1967~ at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New Yo~k. .Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- February 16, 1967 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1057 - 9:45 P.M.i(E.S.T.)~ Upon application of Peter School, Inc., 43 West 10th Street, HuntingtonStation, New York, a/c Joe's Garage, Main Road, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection .(a), for permission to retain a pole sign, with insufficient setback from the ~roperty line. Location of pro~ty: north side Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded north by Russell Tabor, east by Russell Tabor, south by Main Road, west by Harry Terry, Est. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, the legal notice of~earing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and the notice to the applicant. THE CPL%IRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak for this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: The pole is on the line, approximately. After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a pole sign with insuf~ient setback. The Board denies this application as applied for, stating that this pole sign must be moved back at least far enough so that no part overhangs the public highway. Findings of the Board are this sign is on the line of the public highway and westerly line of Joe's Garage, and shc~d be moved a distance~of three feet or so that no part ove~ hangs the highway. The sign shall not exceed 15 feet 6 inches. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice willlbe served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood propertyand adjoining use districts will ~ be permanently.o~osubs~antially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance wil~be observed. Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- February 16, 1967 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Fir. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Peter School, Inc.,. 43, West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/c Joe's Garage, Main Road, Orient, New York, be denied permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line, on property lo~ated on the north side Main Road, Orient, New York. This sign shall be moved back so that no part of the sign overhangs the public highway. The applicantmust comply with this provision ~ithin 60 days from date of this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1058 - 9:55 P.M.-!(E,S.T.), Upon application of Peter Scholl, Inc., 43 West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/cAlbert Schwicker Est., Main Road, Mattituck, New York, for a special excep~on in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection A, for permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from~the property line. Location of prm~erty: south side Main Road, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by Mattituck~School Prop., south by John Pylko, west by Ralph Cox. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the legal notice of hearing, application for a special exception, affidavit attesting to the notice in the official newspaper, and notice to ~e applicaht,/ MR~ BERGEN: The legal description is wrong. It should be north by Main Road, east by Bill Hagen, south by Maratooka La~e, west by Mattituck Scholl. THE CHANREAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no response. ) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wiShes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- February 16, 1967' After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. The pole should be moved~w~x~x~w~ to al0cation that is on the proper~y, at least five feet~from the MainlRoad. No part of the sign~shall overhang on public property. TheBoard finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will not be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will be permanently of substantially injured and · the spirit of the Ordinance will not be Observed. On motion by Fir. Gillispie, seconded by-Mr, Bergen, it was RESOLVED Peter'Scholl, Inc%, 43 West '10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/c Albert Schwicker Est., Main ROad, Mattituck, New York, be denied permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from%he property line as applied for on propertylocated on the south side Main Road, Mattituck, New York. The sign shall be relocated at least five feet from theMain Road, and the applicant shall comply.with this provision within 60 days from the date of this action. Vote of the Bbard: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie,bir. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. PUBL-IC ~RING: Appeal No. 1059 - 10:00 P.M.~(E.S.T.)', Upon application or-Peter Scholl, Inc., 43~West 10th Street, Huntington Station, New York, a/c AveretteSezvice Station, Main Road, Southold, New York, for a speical exceptien in accOrdance with the Zoning-Ordinance, Article IV~ Section 408~ Subsection (a), for~permiSsion to retain a pole sign.with insufficient setback from.the property line. Location of property: souTla side. Main Road, South01d, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east byYoungs Avenue, south by, Mary Goubeaud, west by T. Frohnhoefer. Fee paid $5.00. TheChairman opened thehearing by reading the application for a special exception~ the legal notice or'hearing, affidavit attesting tOi~s.publication in the official newspaper, an~ the n~tice to'the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -25- February 16, 1967 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak, for ~this application ? i(There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak against this applicatiun? (There was no response.) After investigatiun and inspection the Board finds that the~'applieant requests permission to retain~a pole sign with insufficient setback from the property line. The Board finds that this pole sign overhangs the property line, is directly on a corner, and overhangs ~the sidewalk. This pole sign should be moved to a line in line with the gasoline pumps which.would move the sign at least eight to ten feet from the property line. This sign, as it is at the present time, constitutes a traffic hazard. In any case, the sign must be moved to be at least six feet from any property line. The Board finds that the public convenience andwelfare and justice will not be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood pri~*perty and.adjOining, use · districts will be permanently or'substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will not be observed. On motion by Mr. Gitlispie, seconded by mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that Peter Scholl, Inc., 43 West 10th.'S-treet Huntingt6n Station, New York, a/c~Averette'Ser=ice~S~ation, Main~Road, Southold, New York, ~e denied permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from. the pzDperty line as appli~ forlon Property located on the'south side.Main Road, Southotd,~ New York~ This sign'shall be located at least six feet from-any property~Iine. The applicant shall comply with this provision w:ithin 60 d~ys from the date of this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- February 26~ 1967 PUBLIC ~WARING: Appeal No. 1060 - 10:10 PJM~(E,S~T~)~ Upon application of Chevron Oil Company, 1200State Street, Perth Amboy., New Jersey, a/c~Cherry,s Service Station, Main Road~ Southol~d, New York~ for a special exception in accordancewith the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection ~a), for permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient-setback f-rom the prepertyLine. Location of property: Main and Bayview Road, Southold, New York, bounded north byMainRoad.~ Bayview Road, east by Bayview Road~ south by'Jose dePaz, west by'Main Road. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception~ legal notice ofhearing, the affidavit attesting to~-£~s publication in the official newspaper, and the notice tothe applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: As I understand it all the signs are taken care of or are being taken care of, except the pole sign we are here to consider. If you want to say anything in favor of the applicatio~now is the time. Do you have a survey of the property? MR. R~A2~ERGER: I don't have a survey. I can't say much of anything else except what was stated in the application. We don't have anyproblems on this sign. We did have one in Mattituck'and we are going to remove that sign. The only reasonwe are applying here is because it does not overhang the property line. THE CHA~: Are you sure it does not overhang the property line? MR..R.A. BERGER: My office tells me it doesn't overhang the property'and it is just less than the five foot-requirement. THE CHA-IRMAN: It could be put back farther south, but I don't see any reason Why it must be. MR. BERGEN: We looked at it the other day. It is five feet back from the point of the property, but where the sign 'is placed it is not five feet from the side line. MR. R.A. BERGER: The base itself is five feet in from the property line. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone presentwho'wishes to speak against this applicatimn? (The~ was n? resPqnse?~ .... Southold Town Board of APpeals -27- February 16, 1967 After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to retain a pole sign with ~i~ficent setback from the property line. This sign does not oVerhangthe property line a~d is not hazardous to traffic, and it would serve no purpose to move this sign further south- on the property. The Board is in agreement with the reasoning of the application. The Board finds thatthe public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the $~irit'of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that Chevron Oil Company, 1200 State Street,' Perth Amboy, New Jersey, a/c Cherry's Service'Station, Main Road,- Southotd, New York, be granted permission to retain a pole sign with insufficient setback from the propertyline on property located on. the Main and Bayview Road, Southold, New York. This permission is granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The .sign shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs. 2'. The sign shall be granted forone y~r (1) renewable annually upon written application to the Board of Appeals. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. HUlse. On motion by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVWO that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of Appeal~ dated February 2, 1957, be approved as submitted. VOte of the Board: Ayes:- Mr, Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse. Southold Town Board of Appeals -28- February 16, ~967 On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and placeof hearing, Pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law of the State of New York, on the Board's motion, a rehearing on~-Appeal number 1031, upon application or'Ernest G. RadfOrd, Main Road, (Rt. 25), East Marion, New York, for a speical exception in accordance with the.Zoning-Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for permission to retain the following off premises signs: 1) a sign on the property of Armaroy~-Inc., located~on the north side Main Road, East Marion, New York, bounded'north by'Long Island Sound, east by'A~ Bitten, south' by Main Road, west by S. R~tkowski~ 2) a sign on the property of Lester & Toner, located on the south side MainRoad, Green- port, New York, bounded north by Main Road, east by R. Lj Davids, south by Vernon Vail, west by Main Street; 3) a sign'on the property of A. Straussner, located on the north side ~ain Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by~J. Brandi, east by A. Straussner, south by Main Road, west by Kzsyminski. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- A?.?. On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr. Grigonis~ it-was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:45 P.M., Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Helmut and Ma~ie'Mandl, 64-19 183rd Street, Queens, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III~ Section307, for permission to bu~] d with insufficient side' yard area. Location of property: west side Sixth Street, Laurel, New York, lot number 37 in G.I. Tuthill Subdivision, Laurel, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes: ALL On motion by Fir. Gillispie, seconded by'Mr. Bergen, i t was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:55 P.M,, Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, N~York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Leon Brac, 278 E. 239 Street, Bronx, New York, for a ~ariance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 6, for permission to build an accessory building in the front yard area. Location of prope~y: Southold Town Board of Appeals -29- February 16,1967 east side Nassau Point'Road, Cutchogue, New York, ~ lot number 49 in Nassau Point-Club Properties, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:-ALL On motion by Mr~ Bergen, seconded by Mr. Gillis~ie, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:05 P.M.!(E.S~'T.), Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, MainRoad, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Harold Feinberg, d/b/a South- ampton Produce Distributors, Sound-Aveaue, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with theZdning Ordinance, Article X, Section 1007, Subsection (~), for per- mission to expand a non-conforming use. Location.of property: south side Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, bounded ~orth by Sound Avenue, east by William Unkelbach, south byWilliam Unkelbach, west by'Philip Prins. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Fir. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Boardof Appeals set 8:151P.M.(E.s.T.)~ Thursday, March 2~ 1967, at the Town Office, MainRoad, Southold, New York, as the time an~ place of hearing upon~'mpplic'ation of-Edward H. Williams, III, Route 25, Orient~ New York, for a special exceDtion in accordance with the'Zoning Ordinance~ Article III, Section~300~ Subsection 5 a,.for permission to oonvert-a one family dwelling into a two family-dwelling. Location of property: north side MainRoad, Orient, New York, bounded northby'Lawrence'Reybine,east'by Rose Palm~ ~South ~by Main Road, west byLawrence Reybine. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by M_r. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals set 8:30 p.m.:~E.S.T.) Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the-time and place of'hearing upon applicmtion of Lions Club of Mattituck, Mattituck, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, SubsectiOn 10, for permission to retain an off premises sign on theproperty of Terry R. Tuthill. Location Southold Town BOard of Appeals -20- February 16, 1967 of property: north side Route 25, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by LjG.~ Tuthill Est. , east by L.G. Tuthill Est., south by'Main Road, west by'L.G.' Tuthill Est. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Hulse, sedonded by'bit. Bergen, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of'Appeals'set 8:35 P.M~(E.S.T.), Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, Main Road~ Southold~ New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of'Shell Oil Company, ArgyleSquare, Babylon, New York, for'a special exception in accordance with' the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (c), for permission to retain a roof sign on, pylon. Location of property: Main and Old Road and BrayAvenue, Laurel, New York, bounded north by'Main Road, east by Alrod Realty, south byOld Main Road, west by'Old Main Road and Main Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- On motion by Mr. Bergen,. seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was RESOLVED-thatthe Southold Town Board of Appeals set 8:45 P.M., Thursday, March 2, 1967, at'the Town Office, Main Road,-Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Fleet Lu~mberj'.Inc., Route 25, Greenport, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article IV, section 408, Subsection (B), for permission to retain wall signs. Location of propert~ south side Main Road, Greenport, New York, boundednorth by Main Road, east by'Andrew Cassidy, south by Railroad, west by Robert Brown. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL On motion by Mr. Bergen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 9:00 P.M.~(E.S.T.)~. Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town Office, MainRoad, Southold, New York, as thetime and ~lace of hearingupon application of Michael and Mary Morris, Route 25, Southold, New York, for a speical exception in accordance with the Zoning~Ordinar~e, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection (a), for permission to retain an on premises $outhold Town Board of Appeals -31- February 16, 1967 identification sign with~xcessive size. Location of prol~rty: south side MainRoad, Southold, New York, bounded north by Lieblein, east by Bud's Pond~ south by Booth, west by Main Road. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL The next'regular meeting, of the'Southold Town Board '~ Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, March 2, 1967, at. the TOWn, Office, Main Road, Southold, New York. The meeting was adjourned at~ 11:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Barbara'C. Dittmann, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals / //× /