HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-03/02/1967 S°uthold Town Board of Appeals
SOUTHOLO, L. I., N. Y.'
Telephone $O 5-96d0
APPEAL BOARD
MEMBERS
Robert ~'. Gillispi¢, Jr.~ Chairm~n
Robert
Charles Gr¢]onis, Jr.
S~r~¢ Doyen, .Jr.
Fred' Huls¢, Jr.
SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS
March 2, 1967
A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals
was held at 7:30 P.M.~ Thursday, March 2, 1967, at the Town
Office, Main Road, Southold, New York.
There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr.,
~hairman; Fred Hulse, Jr.~ Serge Doyen, Jr.
Absent: Messrs: Charles Grigonis~ Jr., Robert Bergen.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1031 - 7:30 P.M.~.S.T.), Pursuant
to Section 267 of the Town Law of the State of New York, on 'the
Board's ~otion, a rehearing on Appeal number 1031, upon application
of Ernest'G. Ra~Drd, Main Road, (Rt. 25}, East Marion, New York~
for a.special exception in accordance with the Zoning'Ordinance,
Article III, Section 300~ subsection 10, f®r-permisssion to
retain the following off premises signs: 1) a sign on the
property of Armaroy, Inc., located on the north side Main Road
East Marion~ New York~ bounded north by A®ng Island Sound, east
by A. Bitten, south by main Road, west by S. Rutkowski; 2) a
sign on the property of Lester & Toner, located on the south
side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by Hain Road~
east by R.L. Davids, south by Vernon Vail, west by Main~Street;
3) a sign on the property of A.--Straussner,'located on-the ~
north'side Main Road, Greenport, New York~ bounded nor.~h by
J. Brandi, east by A.-Straussner, south by, Main Road~ west by
Kzsyminski.
$outhold Town Board of Appeals
-2-
March 2, 1967
TheChairman read the legal notice of hearing, and
the notice to the applicant.
THECHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application?
ERNEST RADFORD: I would like to speak on my own behalf.
I have prepared this in writing and I would like permission to
read it.
CHAIRMAN: How long will it take to read it?
ERNEST HA/)FORD: Less than fi~e minutes.
THE CHAIRMAN: Go ahead.
ERNEST RADFORD: First I want to take this opportunity to
thank the Boardfor granting this rehearing. Early in January
or the last part'of December I attended a hearing relative to
an application by another party for the continuance of certain
off premises signs, at which time the Board of-Appeals declared
i~$intention to deny all applications for special exceptions
permission to continue such signs, certain essential business
signs in accordance With the Board's determination.
THE CHAIRMAN: Would you please re-read that statement.
ERNEST RADFORD: ~Ir.. Radford repeated what he stated
above). In other words they were going to do away with all
off premises signs, but there were certain types of~businesses
they might allow.
THE CHAIRMAN: That-was passed nine years ago. It was not
this Board's determination. Most of the signs you,see around
here are illegal, and as you know we are not charged with
enforcement. If you'see a competitor'that has a sign iris
not because he hasn't been sighted.
ERSEST RADFORD: I was not thinking of a competitor. Primarily
my understanding is businesses such as motels~ restaurants, marinas,
have been granted permission for signs off premises.
.Southold Town Board of Appeals -3-
March 2, 1967
THE C~: That is correct. That was one of the first
Problems we encountered when we started to interpret the Ordinance.
The Ordinance strictly forbids any off premises advertising
for anything. Individuals who have business in a business zone
are permitted one wall sign on the front of the building and
one ground sign. Unless the lot is on a corner. These signs
are limited in-size. It became obvious to us almost as soon
as we set down here it would be impossible not to grant special
exceptions in the public interest for signs directing the
travelling public to the types of business which cater to the
t~aveller, and that'is the way the policy came about. Motels,
restaurants, marinas, later it was to include churches~ where
peopte~can be amused. It is not the intention of the Board to
do anything except'to accommodate the facilities of the Town
and the travelling public. Some ofthe motels are a mile,
or a half of a mile from the Main Highway. The~e are only .two
main highways and that is another problem. Thishas been
recognized on State and even Federal level. You gct to~have
signs on the thru-way indicating placesto eat and sleep.
'ERNEST~RADFORD: I understand the intention of course is
~t0'try~ to improve the general appearance of the Townby
doin~g'away with signs.
May I point out this other part here, I wish to point out
certain circumstances, relative to one of the locations referred
to in my application for the continuance of an off premises
sign, that being a business zoned corner situated across from
the traffic circle in Greenport~ I affected the sale of this
corner comprising of two parcels to the present ownero~ At the
time 0f the sale in 1952, a~ old half tumbled down building
was situated on the westerly parcel, and an unused gas station
occupied the easterly parcel. I suggested the r~moval of the
gas station and the tearing down of the old house, resulting
in the removal of an eyesore. ~ As part of the consideration for
my services in negotiating this sale, the new owner granted
me permission to place the present existing directional sign~
which incidently was the only sign at the premises. But
subsequently, a large'billboard type sign was erected, then
one by one other signs appeared until a total of seven signs,
plus a service club emblem. In additionla vegetable stand was
constructed, quite nondescript in appearance, and has not been
used. All of the signs, except mine and the billboard, were
erected after the enactment of the building zone ordinance..
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-4-
March 2, 1967
ERNEST RA~FORD: Consideration of the granting by the
Board of Appeals certain types ofbus~ess for permission to
erect and maintain off premises signs it would appear'those,
not specific, but general cases, and that the practice has
established precedents which may be applicable to all types
of business, otherwise it could be considered discriminatory
and unreasonable.
THE CHAIRMAN: It certainly could, but you can take this
to a higher court if you wish to .
ERNEST RADFORD: The signs I have are not advertising
signs they are directional signs. There ~is verylittle
advertising on these signs. As for sale or for'rent signs,
some agents have these all over the place and people come
here and say what is the matter with this place everything
is for sale. I think the aesthetics of the Town would be
much better if all for salesigns were prohibited.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is irrelevant to your case.
ERNEST RADFO~: The relevancy is in my next statement -
and that some directional signs be permitted.
THE CHAIRMAN: Some directinnal signs permit~d, what do
you mean by that.
ERNEST RADFORD: For instance, these signs I have are
directional signs.
THE CPtA~RMAN: I tell you~ there is going to be a revision
of the'Ordinance as soon as the Master Planners get through
with their final reports. That has been used for 'three or
four years to' avoid amending the present zoning Ordinance. So
there might be an improvement as far as yoursigns are concerned.
I persume the reason you let'your signs deteriorate is because
the questionof retaining them is pending. It has been pending
for nine yearsl One of our.real estate agents, probably one
of the biggest~offenders has removed all of her off premises
real estate signs. There were 12 oversize signs~ not as big
as a billboard, about six feet by e%ght feet~ Many other smaller
signs. There were about 25 to 30 signs all totaled.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -5-
March 2, 1967
ERNEST RADFORD: There may have been an axe to 9rind
there as she has connections with the-Town of $outhold and
was pressured to take the signs down.
THE CHAIRMAN: She has been connected with the Town for
a long time. If this application was granted every real
estate agent would be entitled to a sign wherever he thought
he needed one. -At the Greenport Traffic Circle everybody
from ~-~ Laurel to Orient-Point might want one~ that is
a big corner and we don't see any way that can be handled.
We are trying to get the people who are entitled to have
signs to combine on one billbc~rd. In other words we will
try to leave the billboard there, providing Sound Shore,
Chappy, Crescent Beach and Soundview use .four feet by
six feet on the billboard. I understand thatSt~aussner
has taken.down several signs because the people didn't
pay him any rent, I-don't know if anybody else has
anything else they would like to say. Would any members
of the Board like to ask Fir. Radford any questions?
(There was no response,)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything else you would llk~to say?
ERNEST P~DFORD: No.
THE CHAR/24AN: We have never'given permission for an off
prem-ises real estate sign. We have denied alot of them.
After investigation and inspectionlthe Board finds that
the applicant requested a rehearing on appeal number 1031
for permission to retain off premises directional signs. The
applicant is in the real estate business. The Board points out
that a real estate dealer may display a sign on any.property
that is for sale or for rent. The Board points out that
off premises directional signs are granted to those businesses
which are in the interest of the travelling public, such as
places to eat, sleep, etc. The applicant's business does not
fall within this category.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
and justice will not be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use
districts will be permanently or substantially injured and the
spirit of the Ordinance will not be observed.
SouthO~d Town Board of Appe~s -6- March 2, 1967
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Fir. Hulse~ t~was
RESOLVED that'Ernest G. Radford, MainRoad~ East~Marion,
New York, be denied permission to retain the following off
premises signs: 1) a sign on the property of Armaroy,. Inc.,
located on the north side of Main Road~ East Marion, New York
2) A sign on the property, of Lester & Toner located on the south
side Main Road, Greenport, New York; 3) a sign on the property
of A.r Straussner located on the north side of Main Road,
Greenport, New York.
Vc~ of the Board: Ayes:-~Lr. Gillispie,
Mr.
Hulse,
Mr.
Doyen.
PUBLIC ~ING: Appeal No. 1061 - 7:45 P.M~'i(~-T.), Upon
application of Helmut and Marie Mandl~ 64--19 18~r~Street,
Queens, New York~ for a variance in accordance with the
Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 307, for Permission
to build with insufficient side yard area. Location of
Property: west side SiXth Street, Laurel, New York, lot
number 37, in G.I.' Tuthill Subdivision, Laurel, New York.
· Fee paid
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, the legal notice of hearing, the affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to the applicant. ~
THE C~L~RMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
for this application? ~
MR, MANDL: I do. I am the owner of the property. There
is not to, much else to say. I bou~at the PrOperty last November
or December. The previous owner star,ed to:build the house.
The only way I can .use it is to add on this one side. In
order to get a decent~size room I would have to go within two
feet of the Property line. ,
TRECPI~IRMAN: As I understand it, you can,t get a certificate
of occupancy because the house does not have enoug~ floor area
How large is the house? ~ .
MR. MANDL: It is twenty four square feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold ToWn Board of Appeats -7- March 2, 1967
After investigation and inspection the Board fin'ds that
the applicant requests permission to put an addition on an
existing structure with insufficient~side yard area. The
Board finds that the applicant bought a half finishe~ structure
and in order to get a certificate of occupancy 'for the building
it must be enlarged-to meet the s~cifications of the Zoning
Ordinance. The Board finds~that the applicant's lot is very
narrow,
-The Board f/nds that strict application of the Ordinance
will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; ad the variance does observe
the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character
of the diskrict.
On motion-by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by ~r. Doyen, it was
RESOLVED that'Helmut and Marie Mandl, 64-19 183rd
Street, Queens,-NewYork, be granted permission to build
with insufficient ~ide yard area, as applied for. Location
of property: west sideSixth Street, Laurel, New York. This
permission is granted subjecttothe following condition:
1.- The proposed addition shall not be any closer than two
and one half. feet i(2½') to the westerly side line.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Hulse,Mr. Doyen.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1062 - 7:55
application of Leon Brac, 278 E. 239'Street, Bronx, New York,
for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article III,-Section 300, Subsection 6, for permission to
build an accessorybuilding in the front yard area. Location
of property: east side Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New
York, lot number 49 in NaSaau Point~Club~Properties, Cutchogue,
New York. Fee paid $5.00.
TheChairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a variance, the legal notice of hearing, the affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspDper, and
notice to the applicant.
Southold Town Beard of Appeals
-8-
March 2, 1967
THE CHA~: Is there anyone present who wishes to'
speak for this application?
MR. BRAC: It really speaks for itself. It is a large
piece of property. I have been living in Nassau Point for
29 years. I am interested in the law and interested in
Zoning. I wouldn't make this application if I thought it
would h~t the locality in any manner.
THE-CHAIRMAN: Are you a year around resident?
MR. BRACi~:-We come down almost every week-end during
the year.
THE CHAIRMAN~ The lot is 385 feet on one side and it
is 318 feet on the other side. How wide is the lot?
MR.' BRAC: Not on the road it is 100 feet. On Nassau Point
Road it is t02 feet. We own the adjacent property on the
water.
THE CHAIRMAN: On the south?
MR. BRAC:
x~x~x~u~ That is 117 feet on the water.
THECHAIRMAN: This property is about 30,000 square feet
or more.
MR~ BRAC: We have enough property for four houses but
we wouldn't do anything like that.
THE CHAIRMAN: What do you propose to put in the accessory
building?~
MR. BRAC: It will be a guest house.
THE~CHAIRMAN: You are not planning to fix it up and
rent it are you?
MR.~E~AC: We wouldn't do anything like that. We moved
from one place because we didn't have the privacy we wanted.
THE HHA~: As a 29 year residento of NassauPoint I
don't think you will ~®~~is detrimental.
Is there anyone Who wishes Ko :sPeak against this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -9-
March 2,~ 1967
THE'CHAIRMAN: Are there any q~estions?
~(There. was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: There is one question I would tik~ to ask.
How long do you propose to live in this accessory building2
What would b~ a reasonable amount of time?
MR. BRAC: I would like to maintain it after the house
is built.
THE CHAIRMAN: You are going to build the garage before
you build the house.
MR. BRAC: This idea of an accessory building came up
because we couldn't find a place to rent, When the house is
finished I want to move into it.
THE CHAIRMAN: The point I am trying to make, what
would be a reasonable period of time for you to occupy the
accessory building? Would one year be adequate?
MR. BRAC: Yes.
THE CHAIRMAN: How far from the side yard will the accessory
bu ilding be.
MR. BRAC: About ~wo and one half feet.
THE CHAlq~4AN: I would like to see it five feet from the
side yard line.
MR. BRAC: Can't you make it three feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Would you maintain the same line withthe
main residence?
MR. BRAC: The main residence will have to be 10 feet from
~he property line.
Are %here any other questions?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-10-
March 2, 1967
After investiga~io~ and in~pectio~the-~oard finds that
the applicant requests permission to build an 'accessory
building in the front yard area. The applicant intends to
live in the proposed building until the main~house is built.
The building will then be converted into a garage and guest
house. .The Board finds that the proposed building is in
line with a similar structure on the adjoining property.
The applicant's lot is large enough So that it could be
divided into two 10ts if necessary.
The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance
will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship;
the hardship created is unique and would not be shared by all
properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this property
and in the same use district; and the variance does observe
the spirit ofthe Ordinance and will not change the character
of the district.
· n motion by Mr. Hulse, seconded by Mr~ Gillispie~ it was
RESOLVED thatLeon B~ac~ 278'E. 239 Street~ Bronx, New
York~ be granted permissionlto build an accessory building
in the frontyard area, as applied for. Location of property:
east side Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue, New York. This
permission is granted subject to the following conditions:
1.~ The occupancy of said accessory building is limited
to a period of one i(1) yearlof permanent-occupancy. Thereafter,
the accessory building may be used for occassional occupancy
during the year.
2. The proposed budding shall be at least tt~se (3) feet
from the northerly property line.
3. Seereverse
Vote. of the Board: Ayes:~.Mr. Gillis~ie,. Mr. Hulse~ Mr. Doyen.
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1063 - 8:05 P.M.'~.S.T.), Upon
application of Harold Feinberg, d/b/a Southampton Produce
Distributors, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, for a
special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance,
Article X,-Section 1007, Subsection (e), for permission to
expand a non-conforming use. Location of property: south side
Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, bounded north by Sound
Avenue, east by William Unkelbach, sauth by William Unkelbach,
west by'Philip Prins, Fee paid $5.00.
Southold TownBoard of Appeals -11-
Mareh 2, 1967
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special exception, legal notice ofhearing, affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and
notice to ~e applicant.
THE CHAIRM_~: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak for this application?
MR. DICKERSON: I think the application speaks for itself.
I don't know what I could add to it.
THE CHAIRMAN: The building that you propose to add is
going to locate east and west, and you will have access to
it from the east?
MR0' DICKERSON: From either sided I think the door would
face the east side.
THE CHAIRMAN: It will be centered on the width of the lot?
MR0' DICKERSON: It will be behind the existing building.
THE CHAIRMAN: There is plenty of area there. What will
you do with the old chicken coupe, is that in the way?
MR. DICKERSON: NOo
THE CHA/I~AN: It might be nice to get rid of it.
~Ro DICKERSON: Actually the building is full of machinery.
The grading machinery is'being stored there.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes
to speak for this application?
(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present to speak against
this application?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeal~
-12-
March 2~ 1967
After investigation a~d inspection the Board finds that
the applicant requests permission to expand a n0n-conforming
use by adding another building on the property. The proposed
building will be used for potato storage. The Board finds that
the proposed building will be 40 feet by 100 feet. The building
shall be no closer than 10 feet to the southerly property line,
and not closer than 50 feet to the easterly~property line. The
Board finds that this expansion will not change the character
or the use of this property in the neighborhood.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
and justice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use
districts will not be permanently or substantially injured.
and the spirit of the Ordinance will beobgerved.
· n motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that Harold Feinberg, d/b/a Southampton ~roduce
Distributors, Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York, be granted
permission to expand a non-conforming use as applied for.. Location
of property: southside Sound Avenue, Mattituck, New York.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Doyen.
PUBLIC P~.ARING: Appeal No. 1064 - 8:15 P~M. iCE,S.T.)~ Upon
application of Edward H. Williams, III., Route ~25, Orient, New
York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 5$,for permission
to convert a one family dwelling into a two family dwelling~
Location of property: north side Main Road, Orient~ New York,
boundednorth by'Lawrence REybin~, east by Rose Palm, south
by Main Road, west by Lawrence R~bine. Fee paid $5.00.
The Chairman opened 'the hearing by reading the application
for a special.excgption, the legal notice of hearing~ the affidavit
attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and the
notice to the applicant.
THE CHAI~4AN: Is there anyone present to speak for this
application?
FLOYD KING,~ JR.: I speak on behalf of Mr. Williams. One
thing that isn't mentioned in the application, there has been
a small apartment above the garage that has been used by the
owner when they have come out and the cottage was rented. There
will be~no~c~ange.
$outhold Town Board of Appeals
-13-
March 2, 1967
THE CHAIRMAN: What did the owner use?
.JR.: The garage on the premises.
THE CHAiIRMAN:Where is that located?
FLOYD KING~ JR.: On the northeast corner of the property°
THE CHAIRMAN: It is above the garage?
FLOYD KING,JR.: It is one finished room. There is ~a-other
room that contains a sink and a hot plate which they use.
THE CHAIRMAN: Who lived in it?
FLOYD KING, JR: Mr-, Williams. The owner spent tim~in
this apartment.
THE CPIAIRMAN: And he rented the main house?
FLOYD KING, JR.: He has spent time there when he has
come down and the ~welling was rented.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is he the only owner that has done that?
FLOYD KING, JRt: I don't know. The ~rtment has been
there as long as the garage. I am sure it was in existence
long before the zoning went into effect. Also I think that
it is common practice in an area, if the~e is mere than one
residential zone, to have.lower zoning requirements on property
next to a business zone area as this is.
THE CHAIRMAN: That is a~ interesting point. ~Can you
back it-up?
FLOYD KING, JR.: I believe this is a common practice on
ShelterIsland. They have one half acre zoning and one
acre zoning away 'from the buRiness.
THE CHAIRMAN: I don~t think so.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -'14-
March 2, 1967
FLOYD KING, JR.': ArQund the business area they have
one half acre zoning and for that reason I don't think it
would be out of character~o grant this variance.
THE CHAIRMAN: What is the size of this lot?
FLOYD KING, JR.: I believe it is slightly in excess of
one half acre.
THE CHAIRMAN: It is seventy five feet by two hundred
twenty five feet?
FLOYD KING., JR.': It has never been surveyed.
THE CHAIRMAN: It is about 16~000 square feet. · Do you
wish to present anything else?
FLOYD KING, Jla.: No.
THE~ CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
JOHN TUTHILL: I would like to speak for myself. I have
property across' the.street, I have right of way across this
road. Our'main objection is parking facilities around this
house. When people were liming there before~ I wasn't aware
t~ey had~eople living in the garage.
THE CHAIRMAN: Would you describe the property that y0D6wn
on the west of Reybine Road.
JOHN TUTHILL: The one lot is about 100 feet. Another lot
is 400 feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: Have you divided it upiinto building lots?
JOHN TUTHILL~ I haven't done anything yet. I have about
500 feet frontage, a total of 2~ acres.
THE CHAIRMAN: Does yQurproperty go all the way back to
the pond?
JOHN TUTHILL: It goes to the Sound. Over this way we
have another 20 acres. On this parking prob~mthere actually
has been an accident there in the past two years. Parking
is one of our main objectinns there. We have a pretty good
Ordinance and I would hate to see it changed.
Southold Tgwn Board of Appeals -15-
March 2~ 1967
THE C~AIRMAN: If there was room to park there would
youhave any objection to a two family residence?
JOHN'TUTHILL: In general we would.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything else you would like to
add?
JOHN TUTHI?~: This is out point.
THE CPSC: You are trying to protect this driveway
and also the parking area.
JOHNTUTHILL: The house fills up most of the lot.
THE CHAIRMAN: Andyou are trying to protect 2'0 acres across
the stree~ IS there anyone else who wishes to be heard?
LAWRENCE REYBINE: I own the property to the west and the
north. I believe in the application it was stated there is
a road 30 foot wide. This is a right of way to private
property north of the Main Road.
FRED HULSE: The property in question has no right to it?
LAWRENCE REYBINE: It has been used as a parking place
because theywere friends of mine and nothing was said. I
have neverbeen awaNe of anyone living in the garage. Mr.
Williams usually come down after-the rental season was over.
THE' CHAIRMAN: How much time does Mr. Williams spend here?
LAWRENCE REYBINE: I don'tknow how much time he spends
there. You have only 75 foot frontage here and you are talking
about double occupancy.
THE~CHAIRMAN: The Ordinance requires 25~000 square feet,
200 feet frontage, if you were starting out to build a~c two
family residence. It requires a double lot. There are good
reasons for that. At first we thought it would be be~ter to
convert a old dwelling into a two family residence~ rather
than let it deteri~te. The thinking changed'~w~ a good
deal after we discovered how little water there is available,
and Orient is one of the places were there is a limited
amount of water. Is tt~e anyone, else who wishes to be
heard against this application?
SouthOld Town Board of Appeals -16-
March 2, 1967
WILLtAM~W~SOCKI: I go along with what has been said.
THE C~: You live directly opposite from the
property in question?
WYT.LIAM~KI: Live across the street.
no two family house unless he built a new one.
house.
That house is
I know that
THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other~-~uesti~ns?
(There was no response.)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the applicant requests permission to convert a one family
dwelling into a two family dwelling on the Main Road in
Orient. The Board finds-that the lot is undersized and does
not meet the present requirements of the Zoning Ordinance
for a two family dwelling. The lot isapproximately 75
feet by 210 feet deep and entirely inadequate for two
family occupancy. The Board finds that parking facilities
for even two cars are inadequate. The Board points out
that financial hardship is notconsidered a valid hardship
in considering.this type of application. The Board also
points out'that-Orient is one of the areas in:Southold
Town were there is. a limited amount of fresh' water, therefore,
said proposed two family dwelling would not be in keeping
with the report of the professional water survey done for
Southold Town.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
and justice will not be served and the legally established or
permitted use of neighborhood propertyand adjoining use
districts will be permanently.or substantially injured and the
spirit or,the Ordinance will not be observed.
On motion by' Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hutse, it was
_RESOLVED that-Edward H. Will%_ms, III~ Route 25, Orient,
New York,~be denied permission to convert a one family
dwelling into a two family dwelling on propertylocated on
the north sideMain Road~ Orient, New York.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -17-
March 2~ 1967
PUBLIC HE. ARING: Appeal No. 1065 - 8:30P.M~.~E.S.T.'), Upon
application of Lions Club of Mattituck, Mattituck, New York~
for a special exception in accordance with-the Zoning
Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 10, for per-
mission to retain an off premises sign on the property of
TerryR. Tuthill. Location of ~roperty:' north side Route 25,
Mattituck, New York, bounded north by'~L.G. Tuthill Est.~
east by'L.G. Tuthill Est., south by Main Road, west by
Tuthilt Est. ~ee-~a~-~08~ No fee required.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special exception, the legal notice of hearing, affidavit
attesting to ~s publication in the official newspaper, and the
notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes tospeak
for this application ?
WTT.T.J3k~J. CI~%RKE,ESQ.: I speak on behalf of the Lions
ClX. In addition to what is on the application, the sign
has. been there for a number of years. There never'hms been
any objection to itL there.
THE CHA~: How many signs do you have?
WILLIAM J. CLARKE, ESQ.: The application speaks of only
one sign. We have a'sign on the west sideof Mattituck. We
have a letter of permission fro~Olsen Realty.
FRED HULSE: I think that sign is on the highway line.
THE CHAIRMAN: The signs should be five feet from the
property line. The application is accompanied by two letters
of permission. One from Te~ry R. Tuthili and another from
Olsen Realty.
Anyone else wish to speak for this application?
~(.There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak
against this application?
~(There was no response.)
THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions?
There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-18-
March 2~ 1967
THE CHAIRMAN.: I would like to ask a question.. I noticed
there is no fee required. IS this a charitable organization?
WIT~.IAM~%CLARKE~ ESQ.:.It provides services and to a
certain extent it is charitable. It does work forthe community
and makes contributions to the Sight Conservation.
else
THE CHAIRbLm~: Is there anyone/who wishes to be heard~
~CThere was no response,)
After investigation and inspection the Board finds that
the applicant requests permission to retain two offp~emises
signs. One sign is on the property of Terry R. Tuthill in
Mattituck; and the second sign is on the property of James J.
Olsen, in Aaurel. Both property owners have given permission
for a sign onr their Property. The Board points~out that s~ad
signs are in the interest of the travelling public and the
signs designate the meeting place of the~ocal chapter of the
Lions Club. In genreal the Board is ih a~ement~ith the
reasoning of the application.
~The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
andj~.~stice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use~f neighborhood propert~ and adjoining use
districts~ill notbe permanently or substantially injured
and the sPirit.of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it
~as
RESOLV~O that~LionsCtub of Mattituc~ Mattituck, New
York, be granted Permission to retain the f.ollowing off
premises ~igns. '1) a sign Oh"the property of Terry R.
Tuthill, Mattituck~ New York; 2) a sign on the property
of James J. Olsen, Laurel, New Yo~. This permission is
granted subject to the following conditions:
t. Both signs shall be located at least five ~) feet
from any ~roperty line.
2. Both signs are subject to all subsequant chan~es in
the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-19-
March 2, 1967
3. Both signs shall be granted for'one (1] year renewable
annually upon written application to the Board~of Appeals.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mro Gillis~ie~ Mr, Hulse, Mr.-. Doyen.
On motion by Mr, Gillispie~ seconded by'Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED: WHER~Shell~Oil company requested a postpone-
ment on appeal number 1066, in view of the fact they would not
be able to attentthe hearing, The Board of Appeals sets 8:00
p.M..CE.S.T.), Thursday~ March 16, 1967, at the Town Office,
Main Road, Southold, New York~ as the time and place of hearing
uponapplication of Shell Oil Company, ArgyleSquare, Babylon,
New York, for a special exception in accordance withthe'Zoning
Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection Cc),~for per-
mission to retain roof sign on pylon. Location of property:
Main and Old Road and Bray~Avenue, Laurel, New York, bounded
north, by Main Road, east byAlrod Realty, south by Old Main
Road, west by Old Main Road and Main Road.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Hulse, Mr. Doyen.
On motin by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that Appeal Number 1067,.upon applicationof
Fl~et~Lumber, Inc., Route 25, ~reenport, be postponed until
later in the evening.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Hulse~ Mr. Doyen.
Mr. Joseph Polashock appeared before the Board for an
informal discuSsion in regard to lscating a garage in his
rear yard area with insufficient side yard a~ea. Mr~ Polashock's
property ~ located on Third Street in New Suffolk. He was
given application forms to apply fora variance.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
-20-
March 2~ 1967
PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal Number ~068 - 9:00
Upon application of Michael and Mary Morris, Route 25~
Southold, New York, for'a special exception in accordance
with the Zoning-Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection
(a), for'permission to retain an on premises identification
sign with excessive size. LoCation of property: south side
Main Road, Southold, New York, bounded north byLieblein, east
by Bud's Pond, south by Booth, west by Main Road. Fee paid
$5.00.
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the applicati~
for a speical exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit
attesting to its publicatiDn in the official newspaper, and
notice to the applicant.
THECPtAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to
speak in favor'of this application?
MR. MORRIS: I speak for the application.
(The Chairman read theorder to remedy violation)
Mr. MORRIS: The sign has been there for 17 years. We
have four business there any only one sign at 'the location,
and that is the structure being used.
THE CPIAIRMAN:What are the four business?
MR. MORRIS: Fi~ing business, motel~ I have an outboard
shop and we have a scallop shop.
MR. DOYEN: What do you mean by scallop shop?
MRi MORRIS: We open scallops.
THE~CHA~R~N: You don't have a restaurant?
MR. MORRIS: NO, I don~t.
THE CHAIRMAn,: You rent the boats?
MR. MORRIS: I have t20;outb~ard rentals.
THE CHA~: ~ow do you identify the property now?
MR. MORRIS: As Southold Fishing Station andSouthold Marina.
Southoid Town Board of Appeals -21-
March 2, 1967
THE CHAIRMAN: You have one 12 foot by 12 ~ot sign on
the property and there is another sign on a little trailer.
MR. MORRIS:~ Last fall we didn't sell any scallops. NobOdy
knew we even had scallops. We put that sign there to identify
the scallop shop.
THE CHAIRMAN: You didn't sell any scallops when you
didn't have the sign there advertising them?
MR. MORRIS: After we put the sign up we sold them.
THE CHAIRMAN: There are three of the business advertised
on the sign. What does the sign say?
MR~ MORRIS: Motel, Southold Fishing Station, boats and
motors.
THE CHAIRMAN: There is a boat in front of the sign now.
MR. DOYEN: Why is that boatthere?
MR. MORRIS: We are running out of space.
MRj DOYEN: Three quarters of your sign is not visible.
MR. MORRIS: That boat witl be moved out of-there.
THE CHAIRMAN: What is your-road frontage of the lot?
MR~ MORRIS: 135 feet and 400 feet'from the motel.
THE CHAIRMAN: You have over 500 feet of road frontage then.
What is the depth of the property?
MR. MORRIS: 500 feet. We own an acre on the bay.
THE CHAIRMAN: The~e is about 5 Or 6 acres in all.
MR. MORRIS: The property narrows down on the bay. We
may cut down to 250 feet on the west line.
THECHAIRMAN: You conduct five business on one piece of
property is that correct?
MR. MORRIS: Right.
$outhold Town Board of Appeals
-22-
March 2, 1967
T~E CHAIRMAN: Do you have individual employees for all
fo these different businesses?
MR. MORRIS: We run it ourselves.
THE CHAIRMAN: You have temporary help in the summer. How
may months out of the year do the people in the scallop shop
work?
MR. MORRIS: The season, Usually from September 15, to
March 21-.
THE CHAIRMAN: In other words about'six months?
MR. MORRIS: About six or seven months.
MR. DOYEN: These people open and pack scallops?
MR. MORR.IS: Yes. Most of them go to market.
THE CH~IPd~%N: How manybeats do you have?
MR. MORRIS: 110.
THE CHAIRMAN:How ~many slips do you have?
MR. MORRIS: 114 to be exact.
THE CHAIRMAN: How many boats do you have stored on the
premises?
MR. MORRIS: 130, not counting my own.
MR. DOYEN: That is all size boats?
MR. MORRIS: Thirty-two feet are the largest.
THE CHA~: Actually what we have done where there
are more than one business conducted on the premises, we
relax the rules as to the size of the sign permitted. Each
business is permitted a~sign six feet, six inches by twelve
feet~ six inches, single or double face, one sign on the
ground and one on the building. On the face of the building.
Where you have five businesses conducted on five acres, 110
rental'boats on the premises, 130 stored boats, andryou have
a scallop business and motel, and outboards and motor<'shop,
we ofteDn relax the rules. We think it is better to have one
Sou%hold Town Board of Appeals -23-
March 2, 1967
sign .rather 'than to have several signs or a string of signs
advertising all of the business on this property. The best
solution is to leave the sign that you have just as it is.
I think the Board would be willing to grant t~is other sign on
the trailer if'you located it on post or something and put
it three feet from ground level.
MR. HULSE: Can't that sign be made to go'this other sign.
You only need it during the scallop season. There will be
less clutter that way.
MR. MORRIS: I have a piece of ground in Orient. I
have no sign whatsoever and w~e~xxx I actually built that
trailer for there.
THE CHAIRMAN: Youmay apply to relocate the sign at
your Orient Station.
MR. HULSE: You can use one of the other panals for-the
scallop shop.
MR. MORRIS: Can we apply for a sign at Orient?
THE CHAIRMAN: You would have to find a place to put it.
That would be one of the types of signs that we would be in
favor of. How big is the sign?
MR, MORRIS: Four feet by six feet.
THE CHAIRMAN: How do people get to the Fishing Station
at Orient?
MR. MORRIS:-By a right of way westerly'of the airport.
THE CHAIRMAN: Who owns the land?
MR.. MORRIS: Charles Rose.
THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other'questions?
(There was no response.)
Southold Town Board of Appeals -24-
March 2, 1967
After'investigation and inspection the Board finds
that the applicant requests permission to retain an
existing on premises identification sign Which is ex-
cessive in sise. The Board finds that the applicant
conducts a fishing station business and motel.operation,
also a scallop shop and marina of substantial size~ There
are 110 boats on the property for rent; 114 slips for
boats; and at the present'time 130 boats stored on the
premises. It tis the opinion of the Board that.i~ is
betterto have one sign~ 'excesSive in size, than to have
several signs advertising all the business conducted
on tb~ one parcel of land. The applicant agrees not to
apply for any other ground sign or advertising sign at
this premises, he further agrees to remove the small sign
that is located on the p~table trailer.
The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare
and jsutice will be served and the legally established or
permitted use .of neighborhood propertyand adjoin~g use
districts will not be permanently or substantially injured
and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed.
On motion by'Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. 'Hulse, it was
RESOLVED Michael and MaryMorris, Route 25, Southold,
New York, be granted permission to retain an on premises
identifidation sign with excessive size, as applied for.
Location of property: south side Main Road, Southold, New
York. This permission is granted subject to the following
conditions:
1. The sign shall be located at least five feet from any
property line.
2. This permission is granted for a period of one
yearlonly, renewable annually~upo~written application to
the Boardof Appeals.
3. This permission is subject 'to all subsequent changes
in the Southold Town Zoning Ordinance as it applies to signs.
4. The applicant agrees not to display any other ground
sign on this premises; he further agrees to remove the present
portable sign on the trailer.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, ~r. Hulse~ Mr. Doyen.
Southold Town Board of Appeals
~25-
March 2~ 1967
PUBLIC P~2~RING: Appeal No. 1067- 8:45 P.M.(E.'S.T.), Upon
application of Fleet-Lumber, Inc., Route '25, Greenport, New
York, for a special exception in accordance with the' Zoning
Ordinance, Article IV, Section 408, Subsection ~), for permission
to retain wall signs. ~Location of property: south side Main
Road, Greenport, New York, bounded nortkby M~n Road, east by
Andrew Cassidy, south by Railroad, west'by Robert Brown.
Fee paid $5.00,
The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application
for a special exception, the legal notice of hearing, affidavit
attesting ~to '~spublication in the official newspaper, and the
notice to the applicant.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present %ho wishes to speak
for this application?
SAMUEL COPIN:~ice President): We speak for ourselves.
We applied for the application. I am representing FleetILumber.
The lettering on the Side~ur building - one ~has been there
for~35 years~ the other for 15 years. They are self identifingo
There are no trade names on the building . I think you will
have to admitwe keep a neatllooking commercial institution.
The lettering is paint, two or thee coats. To de,re the
lettering we would have to paint the Whole side of the building.
;
THECHAIRMAN: What is the black lettering?
Oil base paint.
THE CHAIRMAN: Can't you~scrape it' off?
MR. COPIN: I would hate to start it. The most feasible
way to take those letters off is with varnish remover. We
wouldn't~have any siding left.
THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anything else?
MR. COPIN: No.
THE CHAIRMAN: Anyone present who wishes to speak against
this application?
.(There was no response.)
MR. COPIN: Coming from the westerly direction we do have
identification problemsm This is hard to understand, but we
have many people come in and say can be leave our liscense here.
Southotd .Town Board of Appeals -26-
March 2~- 19'67
THE CHAIRMAN: The buil~ ing angles toward the road?
MR. COPIN: It is right angle with the south and north line.
MR. HULSE: The road doesn't'run straight-there.
THECHAIRMAN: We gave you a special exception orr signs
on the frontof the building. Signs that read building materbls
and showroom. You have two signs in the front ayard which are
quite legable. This//s something we have notgranted to
anybody that I can'recall. I don't know how the rest of the
Board feels.' The sign on the east sh~ld com~e off, the sign
on the west too. I am willing to be over-ruled.
MR. HULSE: The sign on the east, I don~t think that does
anygood. The sign on the west, there may be a need for that.
THE CHAIRMAN: I would like to see that sign on the west
smaller.
MR. COPIN: I know it is enormous. We went by a set pattern.
It does create a problem to remove the lettering offthe'building.
If it didn't we wouldn't need any pressure, to remove two signs.
~The removal of the off premises sign at'Laurel was
briefly discussed.)
~(Locations of existing 'signs on the property.were discussed.
It was--agreed that the applicant could retain the sign on the
west wall and must remove the sign~on the east wall. The applicant
agrees not to erect any other Signs at this premises.)
After-investigation and inspee%~on the Board finds .that
theapplicant reques~ts permission~o retain more than, on~-~Side
wall sign. ~e applicant preSently~has ground signs and
front wallsigns. The Board finds there is a identification
problem of the property Comimg-froma~ ~e~'=~~ direction.
Therefore, the Board grants permission t6 retain a side
wall sign on the ~w~ westerly side wall, and denied permission
to retain a sign on the easterly side wall. The applicant
agrees no, to erect or display~ny Other signs~ at th~ premises.
$outhold Town Board of Appeals -27- March 2, 1967
As to the west wall sign the Board finds that the public
convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the
legally established or permitted use ofneighborhood property
and adjoining use districts will not be permanently.or
substantially injured and the spirit of the'Ordinance will
be observed.
As to ~e east wall sign the Board finds that the public
convenience and welfare and justice will not be served and the
legally established or' permitted use of neighborhood property
and adjoining use districts will be permanently Or substantially
injured and the spirit- of the Ordinance will not ~be observed.
On motion by Mr. Hulse~ seconded by Mr. Gillispie, it was
RESOLVED That Filet'Lumber, Inc., Route 25, Greenport,
New York, be denied permission to retain a side wall sign
on the east~side~of the building located on the south side
Main Roa~ Greenport, new York, and
IT-WAS FURTHER RESOLVED That~Fleet'Lumber# Inc., Route
25, Greenport, New York, be granted permission to retain a
side wall sign on the west side of the bUilding located
on the south side Main' Road, Greenport, New York. This
permission is granted subject to the following conditions:
1. The sign shall be granted for a period of one year,
renewable annually upon written applicationto the Board of
Appeals.
2. The sign shall be subjeet to all subsequent changes in
the Southold Town Building Zoning Ordinance as it applies to s!g~s.
3. The applicant agrees to not erect or' display any other
signs on this premises.
4. The sign on the east wall of the building shall be
removed by July 1, 1967.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Hulse,Mr. Do~en/
Southold Town Board of Appeals -28- March 2, 1967
On motion by Mr. Gilti~ie~ seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVED that the minutes of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals,1 dated~m~"~ February 16, 1967~ be approved .as submitted.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. G~llispie, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Doyen°
On motion by Mr. Gillispie~ seconded by Mr. Doyen, it was
RESOLV~Dthat the ~uthold Town Board of App~ ~ set~7:40
P.M.(E..S~T.), upon application of'Sterling Harbor'Marina,
Manhanset Avenue, Greenport, New York, for a special exception
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article. IV, Section
408, Subsection (a)~ for permission to retain a directional
sign on the property orcA. Straussner. Location of property:
north side Main Road, Greenport, New York, bounded north by
Jo Brandi, east by A. Straussner, south by~Main~Road, west
by~Kzsyminski.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:-
On motion by'Mr. Hulse, secended by Mr. Doyen, i twas
RESOLVED that the SoutholdTown Board' of Appeals set
8:15 P.M..(E.S.T.), Thursday, March 16, 1967, at the Town
Office, ~ain 'Road, Southold, New York~ as the time and place
ofhearing on the Board's motion a rehaaring on Appeal number
986, upon application of C.H. Wickham, SuffolkAvenue,
Mattituck, New York, for a speical exception in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection
10~ for permission to retain ~ the following signs:' 1) ~ne
directional sign on the southeast cornerlofthe Main Road
andSouth Harbor'Lane, Southold, New York, bounded north by
Main Road, east by'Diller'Bros-, south by~Diller~Bros.~ west
by South Harbor Lane; 2) one directional sign on the south
east corner of Hiawatha's Path andSouth Harbor'Road, Southold,
New York, boundednorth by Hiawatha's Path~ east by land new
or formerly of C.H. Wickham, south by Joe Parker,. west by Sou~
Harbor Road; 3) one directional sign on the south west corner
of Baywater Avenue and Nokomis Road,] Southold, New York, bounded
north by Baywater Avenue, east by Nokomis Road, south by L & M
Johnson, west by'Myra Foster.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ~.
Southold Town Board of Appeals -29-
March 2, 1967
On motion by M_r. Doyen, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was
RESOLVR~ that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set
8:30 P.M.s(EST), Thursday, March 16, 1967, at the Town Office,
MainRoad, Southold, New York, as the time and place of
~hearing upon application of Alfred E. and Alice J. Dart,
Bayview Road, Southold, New York, for recogrukion of access
in accordance with the State of New York Town Law~ Section
280A, Location of property: right of way at the south end
of'Willow Pond Lane, Southold, New York, bounded north by
Willow Pond Lane, .east, south and west by land. of Alfred
E. Dart.
Vote of~ the Board: Ayes:- ~?.L
On motion by M_r. Gillispie,. seconded by Mr. Deyen, it was
RESOLVED that the Smuthid Town BOard of-Appeals set
8:45 PjM. , (EST), Thursday, March 16, 1967, at the Town
Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and
place of hearing upon application of Theodore Rohloff,
Main Road, Orient, New Yor$, for a variance in accordance
with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, SectiOn 303,
Article X, Section t000A and 1000B, for permission t6
set off a lot-with insufficient frontage and move an un-
dersized cottage onto said lot. LoCation of property:
north side Main Road, Orient, New York, bounded north
by Witliam Hab.ermann, Sr., east by Scandia Prod., Inc.,
south by Main Road, west by John Wysocki,
Voteof the Board: Ayes:-ALL
On motion by"Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr, Hutse, it was
RESOLVED that the $outhold Town Board of Appeals set
9:00 P.'M. ~ST)% Thursday~ March 16, 1967, at the Town..Offic~
MainRoad, Southold, New York~ as the time and place of
hearing upon application of Thomas and Florence Jurzenia,
Silvermere Road, Greeport, New York, fora special exception
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance~ Article III,-Section
300~ Subsection 10, for permission to retain a directional sign
on the property of King-Greenport~Associates, Location of
property: east side Chapel Lane, Greenport, New York,. bounded
north by North-Road~ east by Village ~ Property-
A.C . Pauli, south~y Old Highway-L~I. Light, west by'Chapel
Lane.
Vote of the Board: Ayes:- ALL
SoUthold TOWn Board of Appeals -30- March 2, 1967
On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hui~e, it was
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set
9:10 P.-M.'(E.'S~T.'), Thursday, March 16, 1967, at the Town
Office, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place
of hearing upon application of Thomas and Florence Jurzenia,
Silvermere Road, Greenport, New York, for a speicat~ exception
in accordance with theZoning Ordinance, Article III, Sectbn
300, Subsection 10~ and Article IV, Section 408~: Subsection
(a)~ for permission to retain the following off premises
s~gns: 1) a directional sign on the property of Manor Grove
Corp.~ located on the north west side Main-Road and Albertson
Lane~ Greenport, New York, bounded north byM. Renick-J.J. Levin,
east by Costas~L.I. Lighting'Co., south by'MainRoad, west by
Albertson Lane; 2) a directional sign on. the property of
Stacia RutkOWski, located on the north.side Main Road, Greenport,
New York, bounded north by Village property~ east by Josephine
Hutkoski~ south by Main Road, westby Walter Twardowski; 3) a
directional sign on the propertyofCharles Hubbard, located
on the south side Middle Road, Peconic, New York, bounded
north by North Road, east by C. Geinger, south.by'Railroad,
west by K.D. Case; 4) two ~2) directional signs on the
property of the applicant. Locationof property: south east
Main Road and Silvermere Road, Greenport, New York,.bounded
~ north byMain Road, east'by Strelsa Vansciver, south by
Railroad, west by Silvermere Road.
Vote of~the Board: Ayes:- ALL
The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of
Appeals will be held at 7:30 P.M.,Thursday, March
at the Southold Town~Office~ Main Road, Houthold,New York~
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Southold Town Board of Appeals