Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZBA-06/17/1982
¡ a 9 h Å F # ‚ 9 Î .‹ o.³ 9.$ v-8 Å/N ).$ f.ª --Ù -b Í Od HO3 ™OK ýOH Î “š …’M é’Ú Ø˜9 Î ´ð Ô´Ÿ ‰´ˆ Ï Ö: %ÖH )’ Ý”$ ’8 i’ “N +´7 y´a ó´™ ¤µ: Î š … u 9Š Ø 9 *M & É9 N | 0O Ï <Š q<$ ®:M :Ú ?& <9` ¸:1 9K h;% £9c 9M ‚97 Ñ [Å ¬`‰ K`O ²[a )`% e[Ù U\$ [% Í[p Y[H Î › …œ9 Õœb Lœ‰ îL QÆ -œu ¹: ¢9 Ñ ¾œ ƒ¾O ê¾8 9½œ ï¾$ )¾ ݽ9 -¾9 }¾Ú nÃ\ Ï àH Í "› „!9 Õ"a M"8 ž"Ä y"7 É"8 #² á"9 Í C éC± ±DÅ CK ðCè õDH Î †š ……8 Ö‡° ‡œ O†O µ†9 † ¹ˆ9 †` ƒ†$ Î ¦‹ q¦" ¬¦% é¦9 :¦œ ì¨N P§\ Æ 50 ÔÑ 4 Ï 7Ó TÍ 2 " UM! ~M, ±N( Xn$ „nj õoR TŽ. ‰ŽU ç& € € T¯1 ‘¯ ¶¯2 Ô æ$ æD Nè fè[ Êée Ô @ :b £ ? ê \ Ô 'a >)> …), Ô H7 I8 –J! ¿J, õK4 Ó ih Dj+ ˆk. Öl3 ѯ# ý¯D J±V ½²2 ö²! ³3 ÿÐa xÒ( ¨Òi ÓW yÔ, ÕN ñj òe ïô óJ Ñ +4 ,# :,[ å l? -n$ Zm' ˆn/ ÁnJ pi p= Æq írj `r vr- «tC öyR Ou! wv} üv< @|` ©y Ð “( Ð “( . 7Ž! a™ ( 07 n‘C º’ Ú˜ ü™F Jš g”8 §”d –N iœ Š—" ³—f )Ÿ M™G Ð ®* ³N W¯" ‚°K Ô°f A¸% m³I ¾³S ´+ MµI ž¼5 Û¶! ·‰ •¸ ¸@ ÷¹* )¹8 iºH Ð ÕS +Ð! TÑt ÒÒZ 4Ù FÒ^ «Õœ OÖ cÜ6 ¡Ü, ×Ý3 ØH `Þ sÙ9 ´Úh $à FÚ nÛ[ Ð ï ñ ð ñE gñ" ñ! ¸ò9 úóh jú( šõk õ .õ! Vöp Ö÷? ø 6þ Xù} Ýú úù! #ûI sû Ï ` 89 yN Ï) (_ > ×. d y ›" ÄW "& Q Southold Town Board of Appeals June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 3000 - John J. Bogert, continued:) CHAIRMAN continued: of the board members? (None) (It is noted in the file that a telegram was received at 3:15 p.m. this date regarding opposition to this proposed tower from an adjoining property owner (Guido Goldman Trustee/MFG Management Co., Gay Fugate) which was as follows: ...Gentlemen: Notice to adjacent property owner for high variance relief received on June 16, 1982. Insufficient time to arrange for representation at June 17, 1982 7P.M. meeting. Given limited information available. Believe telescopic aerial in particular location could have serious drawbacks on esthetics and environmental characteristics of the area. Am opposed and hereby request the board to reject the variance relief. Guido Goldman Trustee/MGF Management Co. (Gay Fugate).) CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Hearing no further comments on either side, I'll make a motion closing the hearing subject to receiving a communi- cation that we're going to get from a Gay Fugate, who called this afternoon and indicating that she would be sending us a mailagram indicating her opinion of this particular application, in hopes that the closing of this hearing will incur a five-day lapse. In other words, it will be closed subject to that, and if we don't receive it within five days, it will be officially closed. MEMBER GRIGONIS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing subject to receiving communication from Gay Fugate within five days of this date. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. The Chairman announced that the application for SERPENTINE REAL ESTATE CORP., Appeal No. 2999, has been requested by the attorney for the applicant to be WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that Appeal No. 2999, application for SERPENTINE REAL ESTATE CORP., be and hereby is WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE as re- quested. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. Southold Town Board of Appeals June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2989. Application of LUCY E. MICHAELS, 3570 Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct deck addi- tion to dwelling with an insufficient rearyard setback at 3570 Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold; bounded north by Laughing Waters; west by Tschiember; south by Minnehaha Boulevard; east by Young; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-87-3-7. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:05 p.m. and read the appeal application and legal notice of hearing in its entirety. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: We have a copy of a sketch indicating the 46' rearyard, which would be reduced to, I believe, 30 feet if this depth was granted, is that correct, sir? MR. MICHAELS: It's about right. MR. CHAIRMAN: And we have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this property and the surrounding properties in Laughing Waters. Would you like to speak in behalf of the application, Mr. Michaels? MR. MICHAELS: We received the letter from the D.E.C. today, and because there is a bulkhead there more than 100 feet in leghth, a permit is not required. Would you like to have this? It just came today. MR. CHAIRMAN: This is the original. SECRETARY: We can mail you a copy back. MR. CHAIRMAN: We're having trouble with the copier machiner tonight. Is there anything else you would like to say, Mr. Michaels? MR. MICHAELS: No, that's all. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? (None) Anybody like to speak against the application? (None) Any questions from any board members? (None) Hearing no further questions, I'll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision until a later date. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the matter of Appeal No. 2989, application of LUCY E. MICHAELS. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- June i7, 1982 Reg. Mtg. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2805. Application of VINCENT W. ANNA- BEL, Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient road frontage of one parcel proposed in a two-lot division of property located at Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, NY; bounded north by Still- water Avenue, Kiernan, Annabel; west by Stillwater Road; south by Stillwater Road; east by East Creek; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000- 137-3-8. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:10 p.m. and read the appeal application and legal notice of hearing in its entirety. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: We have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this property and the surrounding properties. And we have a copy of a sketch prepared by VanTuyl on March 15, 1981---I should say a survey...indicating Lot No. 1 which is approximately 40,000 square feet and Lot No. 2 which is approximately 55,000 square feet. Mr. Annabel, would you like to speak in behalf of your applica- tion? VINCENT W. ANNABEL: Yes, I understand that the Planning Board recommended that I drop that line 20 feet down to make a little bit more road frontage there. Well the reason I didn't do that, and I really can't do it is that the D.E.C. won't permit me to build any- thing south of say a 40,000 square-foot area on Lot No. 2...so the property is practically worthless as any kind of a building lot. So if I drop that line down and went south any more with the first lot, Lot No. 1, the second lot would practically be rendered useless because it wouldn't be considered as a 40,000 square-foot building area any more. All that south area is wetlands, and the D.E.C. won't let us do anything with it. I went through that with the D.E.C. and this is the boundaries that they come up with. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Ok. This is our problem. If we were to close the hearing tonight, and the Planning Board did pursue that 20 feet that they want the rear adjustment for, if it was not a unanimous vote, the vote would be a void vote and therefore my suggestion to you is that we recess the hearing until the next regularly scheduled hear- ing, which is the 8th of July, at which time we should then know if the Planning Board is going to pursue this 20-foot adjustment. And at that particular time we will then be able to deal with the application and thereby render a decision sometime thereafter. Do you have any objection to that? MR. ANNABEL: No, I don't. I'd just like to show you...you have the survey yourself...but this is as I wanted to subdivide it once before. I'm only getting two 40,000 acre lots and actually anything below this area is considered wetlands. And if I was to move this down 20 feet, that means I'd have a sideyard setback of 35 feet or more...and with that I'm coming down into the wetland area where I can't put a house. So this is my big problem. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: You see, they may be talking 20 feet here down to a point of zero (triangular section)...I don't know. I don't know if they're talking 20 feet altogether. Maybe just by adding a little more road frontage on this. So before we make any -- Southold Town Board of Appeals -5- June 17, 1982 (Appeal No. 2805 - Vincent W. Annabel, continued:) MR. ANNABEL: Ail right, so I'll talk to Henry then. I have talked to him and I understood he wanted 20 feet straight across, you see, and that wouldn't do me any good. MR. CHAIRMAN: Ask him to send us communications, and this-- MR. ANNABEL: If he's talking about 20 feet here coming out to a point here, well I think that probably would work out. You know, I don't see any objection. But I'm trying to keep my 40,000 square feet above anything below here (wetlands). That's the big problem that I have. MR. CHAIRMAN: You understand though that if we close the hearing and then there's an adjustment, then you would have to go through the whole process again. MR. ANNABEL: Right. I'm agreeable. Look, anything to help me out, I'll appreciate. I first started in 1978 but then I dropped it. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: You're very welcome. Anybody wishing to speak also in favor of this application? Anybody like to speak against the application? (None) Any questions from any board members? (None) Hearing no further comments, I'll make a motion recessing this parti- cular hearing until the next regularly scheduled meeting, which we would assume to be July 8th. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to recess App.eal No. 2805, application of VINCENT W. ANNABEL to the next regularly-scheduled meeting of JULY 8, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2988. Application of JOSEPH W. HAWKINS, 7085 Horton Lane, Southold, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-32A for permission to construct windmill exceeding the height limitations for accessory structures. Location of Property: 7085 Horton Lane, Southold, NY; bounded north by Horton Lane; east by Sheffield; south by Kramer and Kempner; west by Booth and others; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-54-7-1.004. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:15 p.m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: We have a copy of a sketch indicating Mr. Hawkins' house and we have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map showing this lot and the surrounding lots in the area. Is h B ß׿ – 1 Ø¿ – 1 e S e p e n o s k i , A P 0 @ 5½ 5½ Qg B 9À – 1 V9À – 1 m S i m m o n s , C h a r l e s P 0 @ 7½ 7½ Qg B éÀ – 1 î©À – 1 u S i m m o n s , C h a r l e s P ( 2 ) 0 @ 9½ 9½ oa B h¥Á – 1 ¥Á – 1 ƒ S c o t t , R o b e r t & T u t h i l l , J o h n 0 @ ;½ ;½ Qg B B! – 1 ®! – 1 e S i m i c i c h , J o h n 0 @ =½ =½ gh B Á†Â – 1 ‡Â – 1 y S u m m i t E s t a t e s S e c t i o n 2 0 @ ?½ ?½ gh B ‡Ã – 1 ×à – 1 y S u m m i t E s t a t e s S e c t i o n 1 0 @ A½ A½ ßg B ßkÄ – 1 ²Ä – 1 T u t h i l l , G e o r g e S e c t i o n s 2 - 7 0 @ C½ C½ ßg B ËûÅ – 1 ¼ Æ – 1 { T u t h i l l , G e o r g e S ec t i o n 1 0 @ E½ E½ Qg B #»Æ – 1 ?»Æ – 1 [ T o l l e w o o d 0 @ G½ G½ oa B _‘Ç – 1 Ž‘Ç – 1 i T e r r y , L o r a i n e S < @ H½ H½ na E È – 1 z.È – 1 € W m a p . t i f }GÇ – 1 ºGÇ – 1 € W m a p . t i f i “ ™ »8ÃVñ€¸Uò…³HÍRép¤=Öaô‰*¯(µPÛ p ˆ # ¸ 1 Æ ] ô o ‰(¹Hå€ûŽ °?ÎWôw«FÅ ` Ú @ Ü P Yí` H Û Ô? ƒ Ô\5 0 @ I½ I½ na B q.È – 1 ©.È – 1 e T o o B e e R e a l t y 0 @ K½ K½ na B «¡È – 1 Ú¡È – 1 q V i n e V i e w A s s o c i a t e s 0 @ L½ L½ Qg B øÈ – 1 ûÉ – 1 c V i g n e s , P e t e r 0 @ N½ N½ na B /·É – 1 P·É – 1 ‡ V e r v e n i o t i s , P l e v r i t i s & Y i a n o u 0 @ P½ P½ êa B ÷(Ê – 1 !)Ê – 1 i V a r a n o , K a t h l e e n 0 @ R½ R½ na B OË – 1 Ë – 1 q W e l l s , G e o r g e J e w e t t 0 @ T½ T½ Pg B {¨Ë – 1 ¥¨Ë – 1 w W i n d s W a y B u i l d i n g C o r p 0 @ V½ V½ Qg B ÷#Ì – 1 &$Ì – 1 S W a n a t 0 @ X½ X½ êa B °Ì – 1 ¥°Ì – 1 [ W i l d O a t s < @ Y½ Y½ B d%Ñ – 1 ™Ò – 1 Y U n t i t l e d 0 @ ]½ ]½ Qg B —<Õ – 1 ®<Õ – 1 e W e s t M i l l R o a d 0 @ _½ _½ Qg B ÓºÕ – 1 ïºÕ – 1 [ W e s t M i l l 0 @ ` ¹a ?Þü Nߦ àŽ Í ½$ ½1 a¾v ø¿ 5¾0 †¿… -ÀP ÀË ‡ÀŽ 4Ár ÇÁ? Πߥ ‹à— 7â* zâ? Ìá/ ≠¬âó ²ê7 üäX Í †U Í †U Í ¦^ @§% x§l ø§o - ©‹ ©% Y©v ã©a \© ƒ±6 ΠǪ ›Ë ÙÇn ÙÇn hÉ0 ºÊ¯ ŠÍ ÊË` NÌ{ êÌ *Ìi ¶ÌR Î éƒ Î éƒ Î éƒ jì ém %ê0 mër ÷ìE Sì/ ›ìD öï *ì/ qìE Îí6 í0 eîF ÁîE ÷ E O ª Q Ì ,A ,• È-X 7-¥ Ì n: oC wp^ íp0 4tv ¿q- qÅ ör: Fsž üwv ˆt6 Õt1 Í ` Í ` B‘c ·’ i™3 ¯“‚ Ë ÒE #Ó RÓ úÔW yÕ( Ì óa Aôv T /ë þ þ ã1 þ þ ¡©&Ô=P T 0ë Ø þ !2@ ߃‚ ÈØ©&Hum\òiˆØ©&s:@ ^um\Hum\Ô=P 0üZ > Õ’ÐüZ L p®üZ xêÀ®üZ €@0 S i · ò`ŸÌ` @Ì` o l m àÌ` O N c €‘Ì` P#'S ’Ì` .MÀ’Ì` `“Ì` @ŒÌ` àŒÌ` ˜ ÀuMðßuM €Ì` b `þª4Ì x Jö` ÿ *…AT~† þ ù: ¹ m ž .ë e o S ¿ n Þ m h Qk u q ‘ L Æ @ ´ ´ Ë ² K ± I Ð Õ = Õ L Ç ú / ù m Öd B !c 3 ¬… G ü„ ? C‚ < Á¢ 3 Á¢ 3 ý¢ - 5¢ 5 uÀ r ñÀ 5 -¿ ; s¿ D {ü } ý : Eü m Eü m ¤. Ú; l l ª~ ©ª1 äªl Y¨¼ xÔ^ àÓ) Ó¨ ’ ^4 _h ^P “ ¢u ¡& ]¡Œ “ Å7 â ÅO IÅ ¤ æ• Nå) ’ä< ¡L b§P É¡è Ì¢d hšx ö™( 8˜= Å& <ÅK År .Æ% jÅ8 ¹ÅŒ [Å þÅ$ ;æ: Œæ: ßæ° ¥æw 1ë; …æq µ1 ) ä/ ( - ' 1* ' a( & †y ªŽ5 ! Œ -†8 " Oîe ( Æé) & ÿ⟠. – " Î P 4Þ )" c¡ $ Va Ír & ` & ` ” :: ã 4I \3O Ã3c <9% w9e ò3b i2Š 4& G2; š2ž M4O “ Y Southold Town Board of Appeals June i7, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 2991 - Miriam Batson, continued:) MR. KAPELL: I don't think we have one. I'll do the best I can if you'll give me a couple of minutes. MR. CHAIRMAN: It's really not necessary tonight because I'll close the hearing subject to that. MR. KAPELL: Very good. I'll give you that information. MR. CHAIRMAN: I would like the square footage of the lot, the square footage of the present dwelling, and the square footage of the proposed deck. MR. KAPELL: The first floor square footage of the dwelling or the -- MR. CHAIRMAN: Well, basically it would be called a high ranch I guess, something of that nature. I would like the second story to include those decks. MR. KAPELL: Very good. Ok. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? Just state your name, please. CHET ORLOWSKI: I'm Chet Orlowski. I'm the builder of the house. I built that house about 15 years or so ago. The house is roughly I guess about 1200 square feet on the floor area, which is two stories and I know the area how we built this house. The area of the house with that lot I would dare say would be almost close to 40,000 square feet...I'm not sure. I don't have my survey with me. But I know when we built the house we built this retaining wall back from the bulkhead about six feet and this is where we wanted to construct this deck. I'm the contractor that is supposed to construct the deck, and I built this house originally and have done a lot of work for Mr. and Mrs. Batson, and we are not extending out over the water. We're only extending into that main wall which is the retaining wall, which is about six feet back from the bulkhead. And it's going to off the second story which is past the D.E.C. requirements. So we're not involved with that department. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of the application? Is there anyone wishing to speak against the application? CARL (PHEIL?): My name is Carl (Pheil) (Field)?, 2235 Cedar Lane, East Marion, Gardiner's Bay Estates. We have eight members of Gardiner's Bay Estates Homeowners Association here tonight, and I am speaking for them. We have a what we call a "building and real estate committee" which pools off additions, corrections, whatever, in construction. This committee recommends to the Board of Directors that this addition be disapproved, and the Board of Directors upheld them...that is why we are here. This, while it's true it's on a large lot, it's right down on the water; and the house did have a deck and an open porch which were closed in by the present owners. We think this addition will not enhance the neighborhood. þ/ ¥þ/ 4 4ö˜ Ýø? Q > ( ¾ Ãd z¾n z¾n ÷¾ %¤y * B§ '¢% ûÁD ûÁD 1ÚD ~Ú ›à ³Ù 1ú O dú# ù3 Á i c ? bA bA ª` 3Y À K À K ¥ ¥ ¥ ¥ 39! À/ À/ .ž À½¿ ½‚ ïf xï% ¨îA T "? è 6 6 c˜4 6 6 ¡ý&Ô=P #? ¶ #? ü ' «óD 7C ƒ ¦ü % PJw ' PJw ' gÅc Õ¹& ®A z , z , ²/ ²/ …I; ( Ç:e Ç:e ¤3H õ- % .% T #? ¨ 6 6 i˜4 6 6 ¡ý&Ô=P v& §–L ý3 ý3 9* oŽ< ³< ÷’1 1L 1L †q ’ #–T < Å–" ðh `3 `3 ( É µn @¶F ¶i ¶) 2µ] ˜µS ôµ› ˜µ( ȵR $µ^ Œ¶/ ĽI ¶f …¹ ¦¶( Ç Ü¬ Ç *) ù * *— ¾* u*2 °)/ é)¶ ¨)X ,+ ;) c) ü1 )· Ç PG O% FX. |PD ÈPž oW “Ql PQ bW9 £O3 ßP> 'W NO” êPk ^O& ŒQ( Ç ~B ~ 7v[ ™uc Æ ÄC ÄG Å B = TO Æ «R !« ?ªq º« Å Ð PÑP ©Ð ÌÑq Å t Å t Ä D@ Ä kA Ä ’F 9@ ´Y ]´Y ]´Y ]´Y ]´Y ]´Y ]´Y ]° Ž Øv€ `þªt Š ` ´ ÿ *…ATÐ* 7 X> u @ N ú$ o I Œ L9 Qn — 6 ûn E & Sm ) Õô ‘ ( ÌQl nM nM nM nM õwP ~ ´ C ®X ( lÀN ÄÄ# ñ Á. )Á8 í˜ CQ ¦” ¦” Ž /f D$; D$; —#/ Ù! CD” éD= éD= =BO Äë? .• Õ< Õ< ( O $e M ”h K 3g N (Þ| 2 w ´ . ì&> 4 . k J À ä u d!e Ó k H"- €!N Ù"% "Ž µ qE …pŸ qÅ sG ]qK åpf  ¢ Ržp ža Œ›‚ Œ›‚ Œ›‚ á a á a ì_ ²ëb Öè` Öè` ¥ <8 ç ;† x;Y Ý; û;5 9;Q “;y <1 O;¤ ü; '<0 b;E ²<F <7 A<1 {< e Ô t Óu ó ÓH DÓ] ©Ó9 d ô£ ô\ wó– wó– e nB " ¯ v? f ¹ u ·u ô ·= ;·% k·# —¸ ²·F c Ø9 ¦ ×I ú ̘ 0 œ×b œ×b d 9Š 8 ¾Ö ¾Ö æ¾Ó ľ% ò¾f b½' à‹ # "I g". ž!% Í"J ' @& ] G ] G %: ò e a … * ø% Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 2991 - Miriam Batson continued:) MR. CHAIRMAN: Anybody else? Sir? BENNETT CLYDMAN: Resident of Gardiner's Bay, 250 Bayview Drive. I'd like to ask a question. I understand that the deck is being built strictly on the west wall, the west portion of the house is it going to occupy any other portion of the house? MR. CHAIRMAN: Not to my knowledge, sir. May I have your name? MR. CLYDMAN: Bennett Clydman. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Anybody else like to speak on either side? Mr. Orlowski again? CHET ORLOWSKI: I'd just like to make a comment that these weren't decks. They were put on the original house...they were just porches with a roof over a porch, and the porch was closed in by me, myself, and they were closed in because they were just porches...they were roofed over originally. They were no decks. A deck is an open deck, but these were roofed over right from the main part of the house. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Any other comment from anyone? (None) Hearing no further comments, I'll ask the board members if they have any questions? (None) Hearing no further questions, I'll close the hearing subject to the receipt of the information I asked from Mr. Kapell. MEMBER DOUGLASS: Second. On motion by Mr. Grigonis, seconded by Mr. Douglass, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision pending receipt of the square footage of the total lot coverage and the dimensions of the proposed deck. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen Douglass and Sawicki. ' After the hearing was declared closed, a few of the neighbors came up to examine the photographs in the file. APPEAL NO. 2999. SERPENTINE REAL ESTATE CORP. The Chairman announced again that this matter has been withdrawn without prejudice as requested by the applicant's attorney. (See Resolution on page -2-. À öQ `î]¤k5þ 4³Yì| À>k @$^ìS/þ V[m püac&þ &_wc˜7 ˆ^wcƒK €âSm p~[%þ (}[ó Ò~É`A‘ ÀNXm @à]Î^ þ ^Rm `>ÿW þ \?Mm! €ËRm pÐ]#Pþ ½ WqC ð¿÷VŸn à6LT `: VZþ " VZÔ$ ÍRm @Ò]#Pþ @Õ[m pJ Ãcþ ½Âc»c †¿¾c§ €Tm p^Mmüý ]Mm # nžMmý¢ `Æ[m p Lmúý b Lm7 ~ÿNm 2 `øUm `&^ìSóý ?äR.} `ßXm @žžhíý àûZm p6~Nmìý ăN¾. tƒNø5 úh `~[éý ’[|o ÈIV À“Tm ` >«X1ÿ Ö~«X G €pVm ` þ÷X*ÿ ô¿W]ða àŠVm `Hþk)ÿ LÞÏTnP `rRm @2ž*\!ÿ îRm p8 Ãcÿ ¿ÂcÞ ®½ÂcHg €=LT `Ø] Tÿ D¿ãSÏ3 ÀSm `ìy\ÿ ¼½×eáT `IXm `ôÝLmÿ 4ÿØ\ì‰ <Um pøžhÿ Z_˜hß3 \]˜hNh `@Rm pÚ] Tÿþ 2¿ãS¡5 "¾ãSLO _Om pðacöþ Æ_wc) J]wck €œWm @üžhïþ à¦Um @^Mmìþ @™Wm @&¾Lmçþ `tOm @< ÃcÝþ @äUm `.~NmÜþ r}ƒN~m À\Wm `, VZÖþ X}Ú^qn à‹Rm `îy\Ôþ ¢ ðeëb oSm @Ú]Î^Óþ [m @6ž*\Îþ @5\m pú}[Íþ PŸ’[ù3 .ž’[mB ÀoTm @ ^ìSÌþ ¼Xm @ä]¤kÄþ À†Xm `Ü] TÃþ –¿ãS®+ `:Tm YYÜ(ýÒ©§|ÔQ&¯ØÐ ¥ z O $ ù Î £ x M ÿ" ÷ ‚Ì ¡ K õ Ê Ÿ t I ó È 0 r G ñÆ›WpE„ïÄ™nCí.—lAëÀ•j?é“hÚ=缑f†;åº*±d9¸~,b7 á ¶ ‹ ` O{ k l *…AT¤ [´ø Â? Ð Ú4 " 0 4&·L|@¾qnDb@ +€ †\ þà 0 ¸¯i^Ò‘ÀF¹XnFEd +€ ò« Ï 0 ~d_ F›gnG¸}‰U +€ ×" á 0 7Z0’’YD`nGÔ)û· +€ åQ è 0 j›H[殊M—ÒnH êÑÝ +€ ‹Ô 0[ 0 ’Ÿn4—;èHŠšnJel¢ +€ ¯ †‰ 0 Û*ˆó•AŒnKã[ÔÚ +€ 5á ©e 0 W÷Œu/FnN"åÄK +€ Ⱥ %Ñ 0 •‚±í¶‘zL¬5nN2ÿQ +€ g [Å 0 AP]˜öÞsE“ÜnN\ä´ +€ Sú ün 0 £Ìç]wF”nN¶¿. +€ àk °† 0 Vû#äD¡H“YnP±jЬ +€ o \ 0 qQÑÓÊÖDˆgnQ|<Ð +€ $ |à 0 7ñlpÆx"C€ûnQø!Òò +€ [í ’¸ 0 ƒM mž0E«¡nR_Ò +€ |÷ £¹ 0 «ø\ í;F«4nRocÖx +€ ]‡ É 0 z†k ufÖN‰OnTzqhX +€ `° …Ž 0 DâžKXúH¤wnU•xN +€ [— Ì 0 Uœnð…yšHŒÆnU¯|¢F +€ ŒÚ ó– 0 =aÑ6 µC•)nVI¾PÏ +€ :Ù Õ[ 0 ½@N7§õM£ónW ú +€ Ø ¥Õ 0 5jK.‰((L¾nXÍG=F +€ s• dñ 0 ˜W‡L¼þBˆ~nYnÓ 4 +€ OÕ ³• 0 …Žc†ÐÓMŠnZ 0· +€ n $œ"E#H Aˆ) „ÈŸøÄa5oaHTSNá ˜A A І""â!DD ÎâÔ ˜ÚÈH\ _\¦‹å 3²„ ¨™%)q4šâTCP—9˜rµˆˆ¨ˆ'] 3L !nââC&Ó¦*JŠˆ¦y¢+w!Ä8 J „Ð II* þ p \ æ \ V æ î ( 2 ö ; È Q Q 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED :#¶èâ‹'ÂrD2>,qD‰¦qHŽ$ºˆK9Å,CÄEq¦pX",¶@ÄEŒ8ªôˆä‡‚‡Ð\á#a ê(çøÉ8ˆø-ˆ¸#"Z9¾éH‰Hˆ8ØDÄ)É$b)¡…\ Ä%¥D„E\È,D,qABaâ&Ž%Dú ÊE<â"n¹#¢©bƒ@ˆˆ{S D$q˜Á¤b̘«"ÒEqØæ"âbÅù`†H„2˜8“€ÒEgâ-â",r ‡!ÂÑ‘xÄQ8ÔS‹A=L† ‚æO\Aš+Ø!Ÿ¸aYÄY8"R€µ FEå©)ôTO<âBBL<̘Y ‚"!âr踔!Éb? aÁé*,!$Aôý!Xǘ(N¹ÐAÎ „ ED–‰Ã†8lˆ g Cl!éJ´)Œâ¡÷Y„‡¨Œ…d\dq‚æ…¢nâ#Cta ŸãƒMá”sΚ7…S6_P ÑuWDF—B„ „e 1!4N]Äa G¤›Â© Á‚袋¡‰#³—<JtoúQNQdÃ,ñ3LÜq "ÒbDã4#L9ˆøCÊSÄE ¦sD ÑÔQ…jE\Hó 'â'â_–ˆkQÜÄ™ F0"ô!]tKNukfEôˆˆøˆ»¥H†!"fˆ¸‰C‰GÜÄ L ŸxM;Ž#g‰8œüˆŒ„ ¹ '–ˆ‹.ÄG‰‹‰#Ä'>qŽˆÈq} ‡ˆ+)„Cˆ˜MtLŸé%ÆiœÆ9Ná|ÄOô‰+D…C¡GC…0ñˆOÜÄ9"gâ“qÑÅ""Š<!"¦ñ½‰‹!âÂ-âBl2q ‚¼ …NX8CBt[˜rÞÔJ …ãd5KÄe)L\"┠Ѣ3d"g¤¨ˆH.dfâLöIMáTP¨La Ñ"¤0B9aItG”‹>{S †e(?Úž=¤|Øȶ¢p‹Ø)PÂBDD¾1qX"~¤ZH|OQcâ&.â&nBDŒàhH!‚cQCUTFDDä£I8•€‘›s @ î ‡Ð II* þ p R æ R ú æ î ( 2 ö ; È Q Q 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 2993 - Gerard Galliano, continued:) MR. CHAIRMAN (continued): sitting in the frontyard. And I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this property and the surround- ing properties in this area. Mr. Addy? NORMAN ADDY: Yes. We want to set a regular grape-barber, you have the map there. That's the only place it can be because it's bulkheaded in front and there's no room on the side, so it has to be in the front. MR. CHAIRMAN: Do you have any idea what the approximate dimension is to the south line? MR. ADDY: To the south line? Well, to the south line it would be about six to eight feet. Right to the south. MR. CHAIRMAN: South line. MR. ADDY: South line, about six to eight feet. MR. CHAIRMAN: Could you give us the exact amount on that, Mr. Addy, some time? MR. ADDY: Yes. MR. CHAIRMAN: You see, the reason why I'm asking you this is because it's extremely difficult to prepare the final draft without knowing the exact distances. MR. ADDY: Shall I call that in too? MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, please. And also the distance from Pine Tree Road, which seems to be a rather vast distance. MR. ADDY: Ok. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much. MR. ADDY: Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else wishing to speak in behalf of this application? Anybody like to speak against the application? Hearing no further comment, any question from any board members? (None) I'll make a motion closing this hearing and reserving decision until a later date. MEMBER GRIGONIS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision until a later date in the matter of Appeal No. 2993, application for GERARD GALLIANO. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, -Douglass and Sawicki. ¸ hâ*È` Bº@ 1á$âQ!5…ƒÐÙb¨Eü’¶ j†@‚AØ„ha@¢<$B¡Ä%ˆ¡E$l„ÒAˆN\ˆ„Gt ’© 2H‚JX-BtHbL\Ð".Ìe ,”.¾`(bD⚸ØCÅQ„d*L\ ’@P›øˆˆ!P—Ñ 1 ¥K: —$ 9BÃÄÇ–$Œ ªQ1!J[Ã…ƒ$¼y¦|K¦BA‚ t™]Ä% B”0˜"ÒAH\t jSʈ‚ÒEŒØ:šjŠ†.ÄH°bºbºâÊé‚@Ä}¡ŸÂ©ÎGÄu‹¸‰ ÿó?×¾ñtñQy".† 1¢Ð ?q(qŸx¦<O´ôQ¥}â Ä'nâ"âGDd›aâgâ"N_Ö¸èˆÉ8 ß ñ#D||dâ3 ‚ó¿‰:b¨#"A„ T ŠÚ b Üú Üú ºe1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T ‹Ú 6 Ýú Üú ¼e1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T ŒÚ Ü Ýú Üú ¿e1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T Ú Ýú Üú Áe1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T ŽÚ t Ýú Üú Ãe1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T Ú ( Ýú Üú Åe1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T Ú Ýú Üú Çe1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T ‘Ú ¸ Ýú Üú Ée1 Üú Üú ° û%Ô=P T ’Ú º Ýú Üú ëe1 Üú Üú ° ý&Ô=P T “Ú ¦ Þú Üú óe1 Üú Üú ° ý&Ô=P €? €? €? ð#cmð#cm0 i_ì „Zää˜ àä˜ „Z@ „Z˜'cm 謼[ „Z” „Z 8 „ZP „Zh „Z€ „Z˜ „Z àfm Àfm€fm€fm èfm ˜fmØfmfmÀû!VXfm Ð/cmä/cm€÷!Vˆ3cm ¼[ p È t Ì x $ Ð| ªÞ|Æ d ®L¦D` ÿ (ùC|Î Ýú Þ= w V3; D ‹Ú II* þ V p æ p P æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ”on0ì©y2ê³Pµ Ž‹øH¡DˆøÄ…ÂÍêpf¨±(œ»Š¸ ˜x ‹>D9áœÎŒBF@ÒË&>ñV8Ž&.âQx7qFQòã „@ƒˆ.Ð4b ¢ðM.^Ä9ታMœNv#† 7ÆĹ!ÈÄ%!¶Ú ÃñÄ6q˜‡ãd\Ñ É(D=¦%‡A8⟵¦$ˆ0ù3t„@8Òui<åâKj¶Îgâ@°hz¨ˆ ÊÐEá ñ ‚rêè¨p4]_’@ˆhX1ñ)§šrñÍ×C D„$TâÆÓ—Lá”S8„㈈ƒéú)§œã.Q8˜¸>Å’º… ƒ¤ˆú›:0”øÇTȬQ8ôGÂæ™S8úq=…ó Rû~ì …††}âM\ ZBä·èF3DýÁQ|Ń‹¸è:(—ˆ#Ä«á Ìp 'ÆÁÈ¿ šz LÆAÄç+¤ÄEœI–Ñ …xM)la˜sݘr sa+˜Â)§\L\ C#庩¦¶G8&:qVÓEq&.:NÂzÄÔœ¸ˆ‹SŠxDœ‰3è—FÌ DĈ“˜>=3FÂI1A•‚ˆCˆ3ÝHúñpFÄMœ‰†©1W”>[‘5lRˆ3q&.ââ£ÄÑA œŒS8„q ¢Gœ‰‹.â&.†ˆO<â"Ît ÁˆˆˆçCáÔÆ#Ž‰*ò霂èL|â?Yƒ cjŠ^‚0½±œÂˆˆñ ŒÚ ê ŒÚ II* þ V Southold Town Board of Appeals -15- June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 2992 - Stanley and Mary Moisa, continued:) MR. CHAIRMAN (continued): Just for the point of record, we were down last week and we did take a picture of the rear of the house, and the picture is in the file. We are aware of the proposed addition area. Hearing no further comments from any board members, I'll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision. MEMBER GRIGONIS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the matter of Appeal No. 2992, application of STANLEY AND MARY MOISA. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2946. Application for PETER KUJAWSKI, by Stanley C. Corwin, Esq., 634 First Street, Greenport, NY for a Variance: (1) to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of the insufficient yard setbacks due to location of new lot line, and (2) to New York Town Law, Section 280A for approval of access. Location of Property: 3275 Skunk Lane, Cutchogue, NY; bounded north by Bay Homes Subdivision, and Kujawski; east by Pontino and another; south by Marco; west by Skunk Lane; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-97-9-10.1. The Chairman opened the hearing at 7:55 p.m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a copy of a survey prepared by Mr. VanTuyl on April 18, 1980 indicating the Lot No. 1, which is 1.167 acres which is to be set off from a 10-acre parcel, Lot No. 2, and a sketched-in plan indicating the right-of-way over the, is it "Billard Farm," sir? Is the farm to the south the "Billard Farm" or is that Marco? STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: That's Marco. MR. CHAIRMAN: Marco Farm 51.06 feet extending 297.39 feet to the east. We have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this property and the surrounding properties in this area. Mr. Corwin, would you like to say something in behalf of this application? STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: These people make a contract back in December of last year and going back and forth between this board and the Planning Board, mostly over the right-of-way. The same people own the property except that they have different entities in that Mrs. Marco owns the property where the right-of-way is, and the property that's being bought by Mr. Kujawski is owned by a corporation which is Mrs. Marco's husband of which he is the principal stockholder. By the creation of this set-off line to accommodate the one acre parcel there where Peter is going to live, we put it on a jog in order to Í´î!»i¥Nx© Íȧq‘þT˜©1HVÄGAò1I´sNà6ŒÒâŠ`7mbHiÜmô¦íÏj— ”˜§p±^i ~=©1Ó"XŒ ÐT uó§qâŒÔ˜¤Áª¸…¤ R ”˜ÀŒ€E&Úy 6Ó¸• ŠwZ ÷¦¦Ô˜Ç½7 Ó¸ ç¥&}ªB3MÅ0F=…; {ѶÀŒ¦i¤b¤<RmªLÈö¦‘Š”®i « ´›y©ˆ=Å3a¢à0äÒSöÒUp#"‚1R qÅ&3ÚÀŽŠqë@_zw„géFÚZ\ Ó¸ãÚIŠCÚªàDñ¤<ö©Ò“mҌ¤+‘M UqŒÏ=(ãÒžW”\W##ÐSvÔ¤SJôª¸žœñšJ‘†{SJæ©1Xð¤ëR•Ç½6˜† zRvéO"Œ 9§p#¤À©6ûSN)ÜC'ð¤ÛíO£ S¸h3Ò¹íRbàv§q #Šh óR‘HFMDDdRŠ—„zÕ\dT‡žÔð=¨Ç·\öäÒmæ¤éïM#&‹ƒ#"ŒtÍ?oãHxÅWµ!æ‚)^Á¹ ´ÑÏj”Š`â‹…ˆÀ‚?*“ ÔÒ3@ü†Š@9§gך)\DddÒƒOÇjCô¤#+IO4”îIƒOü(ÛJà} åûÓö~ìQ_ sܳڜ Râ•ÊHJ Å8 M´\«=x¤§ã4R çÖŒRúPTšC¶F)Fjj&) §m ŒŠ.1(ý)Àb€8Á¥pŠ})Ø¥¢á«A»3NÇ8¥ÛEÇÊÆuíJ°§Í(LšWÌ{š1ëN š1@ùFã<â“`§ ) . ô£¸Í/ ” ÃihÈô£#Ò†(Å;ŸJ@¤Ò„Ç»iØæ“΀E?”(¸ÑRFÚ.=†ñíH0;ÓñùRm¢äŒÈô¥Ïµ? P(¹V#Í&8£\Wz1ïNEÀf(Å;´\C0hÁ§í¥Æh¸î2Š}&Ú.!´„f¤¢•Æ3ùÑO¤#4\cÞƳŽ´»iÜcvŸZL{Ô”˜¢âžô„c½? ô ŒÑpƒIƒRb´\.34™ö&Ú6Ñp¶´¸úÑLAǵ7¥1I@ì4›s׊v=è<÷ m -IóŠ Å Æö£m;4»©ÜvF{RmüêJ Å+ˆŒ-&§5(8£ÂÄXö£n;T™Ïj\QqX‹¹Ïj~ÊM¾Ô\Vͧí Å}¨¸Xsô©6ûR ÷h¸Xn3Þ“ ôý´2h¸XaLžhòÎiÿ …&>´îO(Ï,Ð#=;Ô‡4sEعHö6`rjLûRtä wab">´f¥-šM©š.+ÑŠ“m>´î7{SHÍIåóŒÒl¢ãŠL~ÜÒì¢àFF ©3ž( Š.r(Í8¨¤¦+ ÝíN¦ãž”¹>” Ãæ—Ë÷¥Á¤Í;…€ŒûÒN#Þ€…i£ž¸ÅMZB€Ó¸ˆöñH‘Rb— t 0=)©qHTžÔî+ íŒPp;S¶ÒP1¦“ìQŽ”î+ Å;ð¤Á¦R {sNÇ SA…yõ¤<šy Ñpjn8©1Ò‚x§qXŸJ*M¼ i» ÌR5I·4=)Ü¿•.9§cÚ“o4î; sÛú(¸´#ÛFÚ~& ;‹”f)6àÓè¦M“HE;ð ŒP+ úsIj~8ϵ;ŠÃ6ZM´ü~t˜¦HÜ{ÑëKÊŒPâ›jR1@§p°˜ö£»¨'šwˆ¶ñ@SRí£ qEÄ@A i¸©ÊÝœâªàEŠ*R˜¤1óNâå#¢—iô © ÌLRÍ-Ài ¨ Ò¤Æ(§qMÀÍLW4Ò¸4Ó ¬EŠLu©ˆÍ7Ë÷ª¸ˆÈÏÒ“ Ôü{QøS¸`ç¥&*Ni=E;€Ê)ßÊ“ S¸ IŠZ)€ÌQZ}&;^=è§àÒùÓˆñIƒRœLwÒmÍIÎŽiÜDxÅ G5!…9§q‘ïHEI·ñ¤Æ)ÜÈÅ&*R)¤bÀŒŒÒm© ç„qšw2¼RƒRšB1ïNàGIO¤+LÑJvÚCíNà3Ë÷¤Ù“ëO¢ªàG³§4ݹ©±MÚ; ÜÒ`Ô b›·ÞÀˆ¥ b¥#ÒŽ§p Ç8¤"¤ÛIåûÕ\c4Sé Å;;QŠ~ܜґŠ«ZnÊ—m6‹“a„úŠi)¦ã ©Ü.FFi¦¥ÛHTU&223MÅI·m§pÊja\*f\šnÊiˆ œSY@§‘š6ƒ×š¤ÂÄdv¤QO#ž”˜¦&3JJ~84ÜsNâ°Üt¤Ç>Ôâ(Áôª¸†àÓOOZ“šLgÚ„;ã˜ü©äbŒS¸‘Iü©ýzSHü©†ãö¤À#¥?n:Rõâ•ÀŒ-!©6æšF b<03O# ¹¤Çµ GŽi¤f¥ÛHF +B ´†¤4…h¤Xö¤ÇK¶›@ˆÊÒmö©HÍ6‚ˆöÑÇ¡§mçÚŒ{P3èm´b–Í|í°Å h”pi„£¸ÏøÒÒ¸ì ÁíúÒàRãŠ) ˜¥ÛF8Í. ( X˜¢”ŒgÞ´âàRc4´cÖ‚ƒ€´ fŒR¸¬3müQJà4 š\sJy¢‹–&? Í-‰³ Pxè)iqÒŒÛFÚp£Ò€°Ý™ï@N¼Ó±K¶€°”u¥<Š:õ VBR)øãbÙ <ÿ *1š~ÓO¥ >´ Äx´ìQ@¹FÑNÀ£ •jãiq× Ó±Í&1Ú‚,ÄÚhÁ¥ÀÅ cµÙŧšÅa¸Í;m) âXc4ñ@ Ô]Æž)Hü)éÍ.?Adt¸4àœÑ´fƒ;1‚— •;nhÛíÅÊÆb€ §š ú P>Q¸<ÒS€éÅ.ßjÃqÖ“ü~tc?OZf3sëOÁ . Y ǤÅ?oÒŒÈe§•&Œu \£:{ )øéHFh Ò3I¶œ— ÐF£i6Óð)6Ð ýšM´ð(#š.7/,úÑåûÔ›y£m;…˜Ý´›iÇô¥ÛŸj.cóš]´¢Š.HÝ´”ÿ Ëò¢‹€ÜJ~\ñïF=êJ(¸ÈÀô4´à1F?:w´b—”O—ŸJ(ÀÅ0ƒŠ0})Ø8æŽh¤zÐGµ; ŒÐxÇ^(ÙO+š6Ó¸XfM ûâœTúPG° › ÝíF}©Û}¨Ûí@r PpzѶ Southold Town Board of A~peals -17- June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. (Appeal No. 2995 - Elwood and Carol Hughes, continued): MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody wishing to speak against this application? Are there questions from the board members? (None) Hearing no comments or questions, I'll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to close the hearing and reserve decision in the matter of Appeal No. 2995, application of ELWOOD AND CAROL HUGHES. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2964. Application of RAYMOND AND JOAN YOUNG, by Richard F. Lark, Esq., Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient area and width of two proposed parcels at the corner of Horton Avenue and Shirley Road, Mattituck; bounded north by Young and others; west by Shirley Road; south by Horton Avenue; east by Bergen and others; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-141-1-37. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:15 p.m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety and appeal application. MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a copy of a survey prepared by Roderick VanTuyl on February 19, 1982 indicating Parcel 1 to be 17,178 square feet with 106.66 road frontage along Horton Avenue and 145.92 feet along Shirley Road, and Parcel 2 having 18,600 .square feet with 100 feet along Horton Avenue. We also have a copy of the County Tax Map indicating this property and the properties in the surrounding area. Is there anyone wishing to speak in behalf of this application? RICHARD F. LARK, ESQ.: I would like to give the board, as you know the Planning Board has approved this as a "set-off"... when the application was made we applied to both the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals, and they have approved the set-off. The application, Richard Young, has lived there all his life. His mother purchased those lots as indicated in the application. There are a lot of this in Mattituck, and this was the way it wound up many years before zoning in the neighborhood. So I went to the tax office and got the assessors looking through their maps as to how many affect the owners today. Interesting, this map shows that over 80% are 50' in width, and the rest 75' and 100' which is exactly what the applicants, Raymond and Joan Young are requesting, two 100' lots. (Mr. Lark submitted a subdivision map dated March 1948 of "Edith M. Young" and is marked for the record as 'Amended Exhibit B.'). The applicants are requesting two 100' lots advent of the recent zoning changes. They were ~-acre lots (in 1948), but now they require the approval of both your board and the Planning Board, for which they have deemed to be a "set-off." Thank you. Southold Town Board of Appeals -18- (Appeal No. 2964 - Raymond and Joan Young): Jun~ 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else wishing to speak for this application? Anyone wishing to speak against the application? Any questions from any board members? (None) I'll offer a resolution approving this as applied for (and indicated below): By this appeal, appellants seek approval of insufficient area of two proposed parcels, 17,178 square feet and 18,600 square feet, and approval of insufficient width, 106.66 feet and 100 feet along Horton Avenue, respectively. Parcel I is a corner lot. Both proposed parcels are zoned "A" Residential and Agricultural" and were part of a major subdivision entitled, "Edith M. Young, Mattituck" of 1948, consisting of four 50-foot lots. A majority of the lots in the surrounding neighborhood are generally of the same lot size and shape, and it is the feeling of the board that by not allowing the variance, the property will be substantially larger than those in the surrounding area. In considering this appeal, the board determines that the variance request is not substantial in relation to the code requirements; that the circumstances herein are unique; that by allowing the variance no substantial detriment to adjoining properties would be created; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method feasible to appellant other than a variance; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of zoning; and that the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance as applied for and as specified below. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, that the application for RAYMOND AND JOAN YOUNG for approval of insufficient area and width for two parcels located at Horton Avenue, Mattituck, be and hereby IS APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR in Appeal No. 2964. Location of Property: Horton Avenue, Mattituck, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-141-1-37. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was unanimously adopted. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 2962. Application of GERTRUDE K. REEVES, by Richard F. Lark, Esq., Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient depth of parcel located off Cedar Birch Road, Orient; bounded north by Main Road; west by Brawner and Cedar Birch Road; south by Gardiner's Bay; east by Cedar Birch Road; County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-115-8-20, 21, 23, 26. The Chairman opened the hearing at 8:30 p.m. and read the legal notice of hearing in its entirety. The Chairman was authorized by Mr. Lark and the audience to waive the reading of the entire appeal application. Southold Town Board of APPeals -19- Ju~e 17. 1982 Rea. Mta. (Appeal No. 2962 - Gertrude K. Reeves, continued:) MR. CHAIRMAN: We have a copy of a survey prepared on March 5, 1982 as amended showing this parcel, which is on a private road, which appears t0 be 51 feet width, the end close to the Main Road, and we~have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this parcel and the surrounding properties in the area. RICHARD F. LARK, ESQ.: I probably want to start off by apologizing for even having to have this application before the board. Mr. Lessard is here tonight, no disrespect to him, but this is an abhoration of the Building Department. As you know, that the initial, as you have as one of your exhibits there, back on February 10, 1982, the elliptic building inspector George Fisher denied the application of the applicants for a vacant lot C.O. As it turns out, the applicants were in the process of sellinq the property which they received from their mother so they could use th~ money for the support of their mother who lives just right down the street, when the building inspector decided he could not issue a vacant lot C.O. thereby squashing the real estate transaction involved. I then got into the act, and when I asked him, he said this isn't a legal lot, and when I went through the map, which you have a copy of, of which the Board of Appeals, this Board of Appeals has granted approval of the right-of-way and de facto have granted approval for some of the set-offs of some of the land particularly Reich and Braddick and when I asked him about that, he shrubbed his shoulders. So taking the path of least resistence which sometimes is the best method, we applied to both the Planning Board and the Board of Appeals. As you know, the Planning Board has given approval of a set-off and it was referred back to the Board of Appeals. They did that by resolu- tion on May 24th of this year. The Planning Board asked me in detail, "Why the application?" I said, "You tell me. You've got the regulations. You read them." They then in turn queried the building inspector again to specifically get from him why this application was even before them for a set-off. On May 21, he wrote a letter, you may not have a copy but which I will give you...the next result of it is, he said the lot doesn't technically comply with zoning completely doing away with any previous court decisions of what's been going on in the Town for the previous 20 years. This lot has been in de facto set aside when the Board of Appeals and the Building Department granted building permits to lots on either side and then gave approval for the road, the private road. When I asked him about what the applicant was to do, he had no answer. And then when I questioned him closely, he said, "Well, I guess I made a mistake." The mistake has been somewhat costly to the applicants, and that's why I apologize being before you. The application speaks for itself. I urge for its approval. The technical deficiency is that the lot only has 150' depth as opposed to 175' depth, but all the lots on that side of the road which are the only side that's developed have only 150' depth, and that's all that was required at the time that the thing was put in. And this lot was let off, if you would, or set-off more or less as êa↥O Lmíj` Ð °OMmxzEk à ºLm…Cÿ! ø `OMmøzEk HºLmíj` X °OMmxzEk h p pºLm…Cÿ! X LmLm 0 Lm 8 Lm8LmغLm ( @LmX ™ T ™ 8 ø Lm8Lmð¹Lm, ™ ÿÿÿÿ 0 Lm »Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ H4WY 0 LmD»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lmh»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ èkËB 0 LmŒ»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ N 0 Lm°»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 LmÔ»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ ÀK#P 0 Lmø»Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ Lm 0 Lm ¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ ô™ 0 Lm@¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lmd¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lmˆ¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm¬¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 LmмLm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lmô¼Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm<½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm`½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm„½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ Hq™ 0 Lm¨½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ • 0 Lm̽Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ ô™ 0 Lmð½Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ Hq™ È¿LmÈ¿Lm0 Lm8¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm\¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ Hq™ 0 Lm€¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm¤¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 LmȾLm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ ð? 0 Lmì¾Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm¿Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ x'Y 0 Lm4¿Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ ô™ 0 LmX¿Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm|¿Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ 0 Lm ¿Lm0 ™ ð¹Lm, ™ HºLm 8 Lmð¿Lm ( ¸¿Lmíj` ú¥ èºLm ô™ X `L4 Ä` ÿ (ùC^Î Sú O: ¢ ‘g È î× II* þ p I æ I Ô æ î ( 2 ö ; È – – 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 'P!jø†!(ºj— ×¢ Iã((qÝA˜„ÈE]Ä'.ºè¢‹øÄÅqÓµEáCÄ…?þ× ÐAÄ×\ÔÄ¡Ä™øø ÐÿÿŸ-â×–¸3‡ )—ƒ@#ŽÿUĈ§ðpÅyzÆÿŠQ Á x?Þ Ð#‚@ß]”#Õ".]Ò¯Ÿ¸q<LòcÑ5O†ðŸ>CȉûˆC”×A A#Žtøƒ@~-áût Aw4”‹L I(A !¨A \úÇn˜ >l¸F↠Œ±FD„ ¢pA’ˆC4B â‚ SºñREDtˆÂÕñÿ£(\ÓOúÆAÄÿë†Vc.‚@D9D\ßßè÷Ä•3q=[ýcÕ?~¤ñ>B¼ˆE„tQ®Ç!âzQR2… Ú ½ñACÐØ+ŽQxé1âßÖO\ b?J° G¤?ήpý4qô'.q ]g3q1„ˆhˆ¸° Máq@ýŸ#V".…Sø!x$Ç úó ñ}Xa ".åqéc ½A¼ƒ"bˆ¸â‚qAqAP˜aèJáèÄÄ öÄÝ1¾^(5xW#ˆãôö¢pˆøE\—Ô_Ò‡ ãj¼ }ĸ¬‰÷G™S´D\‡ ®(Láº9]tÑE|⢫úAohˆø½ß D¹^â"ºnøŸ‹ìï¾9uƒ@$ij×ÂCŽuc¾Ó }ÚÜc!âñcD\Pˆ#ºë ütÑ'.ºè¢‹¸èjý!Aÿ(ýŽ¹JjúÄ¥ØUtuïZû±{ôýY¤‡gˆ.TˆX…!è9;ýˆˆ%UaFÃx<ºAŽŠ¡~<Ç!â‡#¦ðƒ@÷§ZÖc Q â‚ 1êGÄ„GÄçLWîAÄ?bí T î× º Sú Sú óT1 Sú Sú ° ý&Ô=P ï× ï× II* þ p L æ L æ î ( 2 ö ; È – – 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED %o %o | BJ\Ò= ¸^è Ã’ > >f4Ü• W T R - 4 1 7 3 0 @ 'o 'o !| BØœÛ= ê Ã’ > ÖsÜ• W T R - 4 3 7 3 0 @ (o (o "| BP^Ò= À½ê Ã’ > ÿ…"Ü• ] T R - 4 4 1 3 G F 0 @ *o *o | Bû^Ò= $†ë Ã’ > :)CÜ• W T R - 1 4 6 9 0 @ ,o ,o ® Bè_Ò= à›ì Ã’ > ëÜ• W T R - 4 1 0 7 0 @ .o .o Œ B†`Ò= Uí Ã’ > L…1Ü• k MA R R A P O D I , J O S E P H 0 @ 0o 0o B/aÒ= î Ã’ > _eÜ• g M A R R A T O O K A C L U B 0 @ 2o 2o | BøœÛ= øÊð Ã’ > ù…0Ü• e T R - 1 5 1 1 & 1 5 1 2 0 @ 3o 3o | B»dÒ= $Cò Ã’ > ®s?Ü• W T R - 1 5 7 8 0 @ 5o 5o ¦ B€fÒ= Vô Ã’ > -€Ü• i M A R C U C C I , D A N I E L 0 @ 7o 7o | BgÒ= L õ Ã’ > .Ü• ] T R - 1 6 9 7 G F 0 @ 9o 9o | BhÒ= À*ö Ã’ > R³Ü• W T R - 3 8 1 3 0 @ ;o ;o ByhÒ= Ì¥ö Ã’ > )Ç)Ü• w M A R K O T S I S , C O N S T A N T I N O S 0 @ =o =o É BÿhÒ= ÔB÷ Ã’ > :BÜ• S T R - 4 8 0 @ ?o ?o | BÑiÒ= ì8ø Ã’ > Œ w“ i T R - 2 0 7 4 G F A m e n d 0 @ @o @o ËG B/jÒ= §ø Ã’ > 1M2Ü• Q T R - 8 0 @ Bo Bo | BvkÒ= H&ú Ã’ > æC Ü• W T R - 1 6 0 8 0 @ Do Do °¯ B<™Ë> ôYü Ã’ > N'Ü• g M A R I N A B A Y C L U B 0 @ Fo Fo BtnÒ= ð§ý Ã’ > H>Ü• U T R - 4 5 5 0 @ Ho Ho B¥oÒ= \ ÿ Ã’ > ð Ü• U T R - 3 0 3 0 @ Jo Jo :~ B%pÒ= \£ÿ Ã’ > yV>Ü• U T R - 4 3 5 0 @ Lo Lo ö{ B rÒ= (óÃ’ > :Ü• U T R - 6 8 3 0 @ No No !| BÖrÒ= ÈÊÃ’ > Ì€*w“ W T R - 4 2 7 8 0 @ Po Po ºi B›sÒ= ¤±Ã’ > ËS Ü• m M A R R I N E R , P H I L I P R 0 @ Ro Ro °¯ BW™Ë> [Ã’ > ¾å(Ü• i M A R S H A L L , R O B E R T 0 @ To To í÷ BÆtÒ= Ã’ > £çFÜ• U T R - 1 4 7 0 @ Vo Vo | B™uÒ= LÃ’ > œ Ü• U T R - 4 2 7 0 @ Xo Xo | BtvÒ= ðÃ’ > 958Ü• W T R - 3 8 0 6 0 @ Zo Zo ËG BïvÒ= ˜Ã’ > ÃÜ• S T R - 7 1 0 @ \o \o BywÒ= Ì9Ã’ > b8Ü• ] T R - 1 9 4 7 G F 0 @ ^o ^o ËG BÉwÒ= Œ—Ã’ > òÜ• S T R - 6 3 0 @ `o `o ÿ BOxÒ= ”4 Ã’ 1 ¨°*Ü• W 2 8 4 6 9 - Z 0 @ ao ao #| BfxÒ= ˆO Ã’ > ? 4Ü• W T R - 4 6 6 3 0 @ co co ËG BóxÒ= Äô Ã’ > ‘!Ü• _ T R - 1 1 7 - 1 0 - 9 0 @ eo eo ÿ BRzÒ= Ã’ 1 )'4Ü• W 2 8 7 4 9 - Z 0 @ fo fo ¼ BzÒ= üç Ã’ > ¹¼9Ü• U T R - 1 9 0 0 @ io io "| BF{Ò= ® Ã’ > °B&Ü• ] T R - 4 4 3 4 G F 0 @ ko ko BÀ{Ò= = Ã’ > ¥WFÜ• _ M A S O N , A N N E 0 @ mo mo ý{ B&|Ò= ˆ´ Ã’ > 7· Ü• U T R - 5 9 3 0 @ oo oo ©L Bñ|Ò= l¢Ã’ > 7Ü• } M Southold Town Board of Appeals -22- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeal No. 2970 - James Manos, continued:) MR. JOHN continued: At least I will, as far as my property goes...I have a lot of adjoining properties. So I have a lake. I can show you pictures...it's like a skating rink in the winter time. It's full of water, it's frozen, plus the drainage into the Mattituck Inlet, which is also very bad from the D.E.C.'s point of view or whatever. So my objection is if this property is ok'd, I think some provision must be made that the drainage from that new property, building or whatever may go up, is adequately ... the drainage problem is adequately taken care of so that it doesn't drain into this right-of-way. And it's a very serious objection, I assure you. Now, what you people can do about it, or the building codes of it, I don't know. MR. CHAIRMAN: May I answer your question, sir? In the application or rejuvenation of this...is the proper common phrase to use I think at this point, but this board would set upon the applicant in approving this right-of-way would probably involve, upon whatever we ask for, a request of the Town Engineer, Mr. Davis, to go down and observe what you were men- tioning, and we do have several conditions that we impose on those speci- fications, one of these roads happen to be in what I would say fairly excellent condition, and that is of course the macadamized roads. So we're basically, we're talking about the ones adjacent to your property, that's correct. So that's all I can tell you at this particular time. I don't know what the board is going to do, but we have in the past when we have subjected the applicant to certain road conditions, upon his completing the conditions or during that time, we do again, let me reiterate, send the Town Engineer down, and at that particular time, he will I am sure be privy to your problem. And whatever he feels should apply torectify this situation, we hope he will then give us-- MR. JOHN: After the then? MR. CHAIRMAN: No. The approval would be subject to certain conditions. I don't know what those conditions are because we haven't deliberated upon them. Ok? And one of those may be that the Town Engineer come down and inspect it prior to any application. When I say "application," surface application. MR. JOHN: Or building? MR. CHAIRM~N: No. We're only talking access now for the right-of-way. We're not talking about.., the application before us tonight is not for the division of the four lots, is not for the construction of any house on the four lots. It is merely for the legal access, which has to meet certain specifications, which we set up. The one major specification is that the road has to be cleared 16 feet and that is free of any brush to allow fire vehicles to get in, which are approximately 8½ to 9½, and sometimes 10 feet wide depending upon what apparatus they have. MR. JOHN: It is going to be difficult because nobody has 16 feet...the road is not that much now. MR. CHAIRMAN: So that is all I can tell you at this particular point. Southold Town Board of Appeals -23- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeal No. 2970 - James Manos, continued:) MR. CHAIRMAN: I hope I haven't confused you by saying this to you. If you want to come back with another question, I'll attempt to answer. MR. JOHN: Well, as I mentioned per se, I'm not objecting to access over the right-of-way, but I am pointing out that there's going to be created a worse problem than we already have. We already have a bad one. That is the point I wanted to make. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much. Yes, sir? ANDREW S. PIETRE: I, too, am a resident of the area as described by Mr. John. As a matter of fact I own the property to which he refers is falling when the rain cascades down, the whole proclaimer falls onto the southern part of Holbrook Lane, the easterly corner right down past my house...as a matter of fact during this last rain storm, the was so heayy, we were up at 6 o'clock in the morning pumping out the water. The saturation of the ground is so intense the hydrostatic pressure goes right through, goes right off the wall...all of us were there pumping it out. It is a serious situation. Mr. Chairman, you say that this may be covered by the Town Engineer or the Building Department...isn't it possible to have a restrictive covenant with the granting of this application to assure us that we're not going to be flooded? MR. CHAIRMAN: A covenant, to my knowledge...I'm not an attorney, Mr. Pietre, is a restriction or a statement placed upon a deed. We adminis- ter in this board our conditions, so we may be dealing with the same terminology. MR. PIETRE: Can the board put in the condition? I mean all probabilities... the owner of the premises, the owner of the property will do that anyway, but we would just like to have that issued. MR. CHAIRMAN: Yes, it will probably be in the form of a condition. MR. CHAIRMAN: Will we hear first from you or what? MR. CHAIRMAN: I can't guarantee you, as you'll notice a bunch of people have just walked in...I don't know what t me we're going to be done with it tonight, done with the meeting tonight and I doubt if there will be any decision forthcoming. As I mentioned to the attorney out in the rear, if we don't make any decisions tonight, the decision will be forthcoming probably a week from this coming Saturday, which would be our next regularly scheduled Special Meeting. And it may be forthcoming at that point, and I just want you to know that we do have 60 days as of the date of closing this hearing, which will be tonight, to make a decision on this application. Ok? MR. PIETRE: Ok. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else that would like to speak? Yes, sir? GENTLEMAN FROM AUDIENCE: You're saying you're mainly concerned with the access roads. Couldn't the Planning Board...these are four lots involved Southold Town Board of Appeals -24- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeal No. 2970 - James Manos, continued:) SAME GENTLEMAN FROM AUDIENCE: in a five-acre...couldn't the access roads all come off another road? MR. CHAIRMAN: It doesn't appear that that could be the case, sir, because there are two lots-- SAME GENTLEMAN: I don't understand it... MR. CHAIRMAN: I wasn't privy to that conversation, but Lot No. 1 is primarily on which is referred to as "Young's Right-of-Way~ and Lot No. 4 is solely on Holbrook Lane, so that would be the reason, I guess that the applicant and his attorney-- SAME GENTLEMAN: What you're calling Holbrook Lane I'm calling ( ) road. I think there are three lots that enter off what's called Holbrook Lane. MR. CHAIRMAN: The road to Young's Point...there are three lots. And the lot that is adjacent to your property on the north. That is primarily on the right-of-way, not the "Young's Point Right-of-Way"...the other right-of-way, because it has 315 feet on that right-of-way and it has only 191 feet on-- SAME GENTLEMAN: Three of the lots would come off Miller Road, and one would be off the one under discussion. My point is wouldn't it be possi- ble for one entry let's say to the four proposed lots? MR. CHAIRMAN: I can't answer that question because we did not deal with this map, and this is a Planning Board matter and I can't answer the question. If you'd like I will ask the Chairman of the Planning Board his opinion on it. But I can't do it formally. Thank you. Is there anybody else that would like to speak. Any rebuttal from you, Mr. Bruer? MR. BRUER: Mr. Chairman, Members of the Board. I feel sorry for the gentleman and his flooded basement and all that, but number one this is an application for an access variance under the Town Law. We're talking about a situation where you have an existing situation here where possi- bly water runs down this gentleman's property. I believe that it probably does. We're talking about a small cut for a driveway possibly coming out to this road. That cannot really seriously change the condi- tion that's already there. If anything, if you look at the elevations on that survey, I believe the slope falls off to the north and not down that driveway...if this driveway was put in it would probably fall the other way. I think it's unreasonable to ask my client to be denied the use of his property because of existing situations. That is not going to be corrected by a denial of the application as to these lots. Thank you very much. MR. PIETRE: I didn't mean to say in any that I deny the application. MR. CHAIRMAN: Is there anybody else that would like to speak in behalf of this application? Either for or against? Any questions from any board members? (None) Mr. Bruer, we were down to the site on the Saturday of that very heavy rainstorm and we did observe the right-of-way F ³ • ´ Ò -ùv ®ú/ æ ? /ú. gúI »ú ßúu _ûe Ïûj Dü- |ûM Ôû% üŽ JŸ ¼˜ ýLÄ B™O ¤œS :œƒ Ñž ñŸA EŸ‚ Bº/ ‚»S ‚»S çÁ ¼o ¿A ½. Øs óÁt y ù1 ! MG WLL .ÃO .ÃO áJe õÄ` õÄ` ÞO ÞO ã¬` ã¬` 9 â † rY Ø ö5 4Q Žy 1 J¤ ÷ !1 ]E E ü7 <1 wŸ ` ¬ o ¬u í ¬I ?¬] ¥¬8 _ Í£ _ Í£ Í\ sÍ• ` åF# ` åF# ` åF# ` åF# ` åF# °îŠ _ N‰ _ N‰ _ n v í > 5% e# ‘ ¬E ] °9 ¯J õ ª— —°b ! á ÑY @ ^ Î ) ^ Î ) ˜Ö ˜Ö á—Ó ¿—% î—e ^–& ¹Š û úI bú. ™ú% ÅúL ÿ ;ùd ¨ý: íøe \ø €ø* š/ Ï óg Z }2 ºH |T ò{3 ¶eÇ “g‹ 5hM T pX È ùù ùù K5 ùù ùù ¡¹&Ô=P T qX ˆ æù !2@ ߃‚ Èع&€! rœáiˆØ¹&s:@ –! r€! rÔ=P ÝH ïG> 6K ZOG «G' ÜGV :K7 {L ŸO( ÐG@ L ë n¶ «v ÁnK n@ zoR ÖnJ )n, ]oZ Ào Ûw; o. Uo, ŠoF Ùo% ox ë »9 -¼ IÀ n¼6 Ä1 ç¼^ M¼Q ¨Ä ËÄ1 ½… ë ‹ e ðB ðH ô ¼¤Pª H ò<¾j¨Ö ü*` ÿ *…AT®H úù Q> ˆ d À ® ¿è ® )½ k¼ ù O k¼ ù O k¼ ù O ×ì i + ã Þä ú )è èý ¶ * èý ¶ * É 1 jù ú + T # ’#‡ % 1/ jú N jú N ƒC# q 1H 9 1H 9 iBú ( iBú ( iBú ( iBú ( ÊR ÊR iTú R ç… & Ë—} s Ë—} s gŒü , gŒü , gŒü , gŒü , gŒü , ÌÅ| ÌÅ| Ž¤Õ + Ž¤Õ + Ž¤Õ + ÍÒQ ' ÍÒQ ' g³ü . g³ü . g³ü . g³ü . Íó| - gÞ ´ï ÛÛ " &ß + ŒëM h gêü W gêü W gêü W % 57 f< Û ê65# h4× I h4× I h4× I eT - œY 2 ÝZ ' O“ S “¢ ¢ | !šÈ" D £ ú ’ KW 1 KW 1 ñ a - gJf F L‰C ? «’ % à ¬8 2 Õ Ây F Õ Ây F x ‹ iêÅ I iêÅ I #ä• $ #ä• $ § 1 § 1 )W , )W , EI . @Ü # E . Lt x€m |i |i ƒ×L 7 ÷8 v ú “ F @ fn6 D@ 2 À x < Ë , # ™ ? Ë Q Í b ²VV Y ì¹ B ¸þ " 2 Á2 ÁL ôZ õl é‘ ! J ’ª y e hÙ ’Þ ïð / K ý @ / ÇU 'ó$ x'ó$ x& ;¸ =Ì =ë >ù = Ðà Óý ó2 ÅI , îM $ ´qK H 㯠$ ŠI 7 ‘¥ ’à ” T ¿è úù úù ‘Ð1 úù úù ¡¹&Ô=P Àè ô *% 2 ™ \ < ¡ ® p ± p Ì ¡ # ¢ 5 ž Z ˜ª +  ΠŠÕ & × tú Southold Town Board of Appeals -26- (Appeal No. 2975 - North Fork Bank, continued:) June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. MISS WICKHAM continued: provide, with a pedestrian walkway to Love Lane would provide pedestrian access to the stores, we felt that we could do without the drive-in there eventually. However, because of the nature of banking, a drive-in facility is essential, and we would like to before phasing it out be able to relocate one in the Mattituck Shopping Center area. The question then came up as to the best place to locate such a facility, and I'd like to emphasize that this is just a drive-in facility... not another branch. It would not have branch facilities other than drive-in capabilities. There were, first we did a survey of what was available in the Main Road area of the Route 25 business district in Mattituck, and found that there are only a couple of vacant parcels in that area...one directly across us from the Shopping Center owned by Schoenhaar, I think that was his name. He does not have the property for sale. The only other vacant parcels are the Boucher parcel down by the Carvel which is very low and unsuitable and also the Kart parcel which is right by the curve on the Main Road and therefore unsuitable for additional traffic. In addition a vacant lot requires a tremendous amount of improvement in terms of paving and grading before you even get the building up...it would just be finan- cially unfeasible. The only other properties that are available for sale in that stretch along the Main Road are the Kron Gallery which is for sale and is obviously too small...the Grabie building, again a bad location and a few of the residential buildings in the business district are also available, but not suitable because of the type of building and the location. The best place it was determined would be in Mattituck Shopping Center because that is the locale for the shopping in that area, and we felt that once people were shopping in that area it would eliminate them from going in and out onto the Main Road. Also the Shopping Center and Mr. Cardinale I'm sure will address this when he has an opportunity to speak, does have a need to encourage business. They've had a few additional stores open up but they still have a large vacancy. They have had a vacancy for the Grants Building for six or seven years and a number of other stores, including the westerly store, and it was felt that a drive-in facility would help generate some sort of traffic flow into the center and therefore encourage some of the existing businesses and new businesses to be in a better financial position. The question then came where to locate the building, the facility in the Shopping Center. There had been discussions with the Planning Board originally on some earlier plans, and we are meeting with them again on the 28th to discuss this particular plan and the impact on the traffic flow within the center. I do however have some of the plans just to give you an idea of what attempts have been made in order to find the best location and to show that this is really the only feasible location for a number of reasons. The first thing that came up was the fact that there's a tremendous amount of drainage facilities in the parking lot...drainage rings all " # ©«@ f •ïP b S < cË% d c# õ·w " õ·w " p°A , öëg öëg hçq ! hçq ! âéa âéa LãY $ ô" ô" ô" Î0 9 , Xþ 0 nÿ 7 " nÿ 7 " ®ñ Q , ì H 2 ï Y 7 «i E ) «i E ) d ,& d ,& d ,& T F» è \ö \ö N¡0 \ö \ö ¡¹&Ô=P T G» ¨ ?ö \ö U¡0 \ö \ö ¡¹&Ô=P Ú! Ú4 ÕÚ] EÚE œá, ÛÚ1 !Þ4 hÚ$ ŸÚÄ # wâ7 %` • ! Ç4 A `t æ8 # /W ˆ1c þ9: K10 ‹9J æ1Û Ö2 1: O6w 䉪 # ã¶x m¶¬ " ¨Q¨ ! ¨Q¨ ! tJ› ' tJ› ' tJ› ' T E» 0 \ö \ö H¡0 \ö \ö ¡¹&Ô=P ™ $ ™ 0€ ] CU ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ 0€ ] ø 8ð™ `OÈU ™ $ ™ 0€ ] ™ $ ™ 0€ ] ™ $ ™ 0€ ] ™ $ ™ 0€ ] `OÈU 8’.m 8H Z™ 0€ ]>> 5 > àe@ x©·B mçÇ6Ý$æ? mçÇ6Ý$æ? ð? `OÈU Ëû• ð? 0€ ] ( –.m 0€ ] ( €•.m 0€ ] ( à”.m 0 5mˆ 3 çç Ð 4 Ð 4 0 @ ô\ð ô\ P # * Àÿ-mx üS ˆ˜Hôþœ^ Ä p Ú` ´ ÿ *…ATnŠ ]ö Ú8 b :9 T }» ( ]ö !2@ ߃‚ Èع&(¬ÈX,ÓiˆØ¹&s:@ >¬ÈX(¬ÈXÔ=P 6 }» `§ `U¡ 4 )TK 2 žRï 5 ¸QŒ 2 oNë 2 ¨ž¶ % nJ Å›Y Œl N uî[ . uî[ . Üí@ + Üí@ + Dg D, =:a$ =:a$ =:a$ =:a$ =:a$ úY yøI Éø} Éø} ¢x‘A ¢x‘A îÛu sÝ ŸÙ, ÝÚ‡ " sØ Öt # $Ø2 fÖ ’Õ, ÏÖA Õ ‡ý, ÀþI ý Aý? ŒûH åüG 5ù4 xùs # öû3 5ø _÷- ›ø@ æ÷ ö+ ˆ I á @ a @ · G " · G " 2 S+ Œ{ J q’ $) ˆAI ÜAç ÓAF '@< s? >- M<ï Šf ¾eH e5 bdi ßc‚ vbF Ñaj Q`h Î]1 ^* Šˆ 4ˆ. oˆa à† l†0 «…k $ƒ¯ âƒ[ ‹«i ªk ‚©h þ©# !ª 9¨c 9¨c §1 ñ© ¥ ˤ8 £* ŒÜ‹ $Ü LÛ0 ‹ÛO çÙt # iÝ ä «Ûn '×8 kâ! šÕ¥ šÕ¥ šÕ¥ šÕ¥ ‹l ‹l ‹l ‹l 3 G n ¹ 7 c + ž3 à ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ Ô: # " ! ’;ð ’;ð ’;ð ’;ð ’;ð ’;ð ‰<Z ò<œ ò<œ ò<œ ò<œ —<¦ —<¦ —<¦ —<¦ s »y… »y… Êp ýo .n4 smb # èp m* Œ–R ”2 U”— ’G wœ! º‘, šc ‹6 â^ · ¸·y @¸H —¸q µ‰ ®³1 îµg " b²- ±„ # \Ýu äÞb Yá ˆâ“ 2ßk ²á+ òâ !∠ÁäÄ ]ÿ X ø : D sb è½ º6 r ˆ@ Û„ ["b Ñ" #P f$V Ð$ %M `&F º) è'" (w Ì Ì 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ÿÿÿÿDƒx3œì8"Nl8ñé4¿ ⊈ˆˆ—Ô(⤌xOx:̉ñˆCˆC‰G¼ÈJˆH¡fFéDœˆG 1""ž &Nœ#L)‰œFELT"ÎtŽˆ‰JÄ!•ˆO<â #b"‹-â">qCÄo¨‚¢ T¡A %ãd 2Y‚ˆˆY ±Åž¸“Á ‡#"Î !Ž‰Ï]œ³çˆ1q1ú&á.ˆ(Žp„{ªPNE¾ÌšEæ!¾ 5Ã9^–‰A ,‰(u4q d¢d) ‚Ðtg¡dÈÄyœÆGܧð)œã¿¦p”á”o-!"¡#ò…ˆˆ˜yŒgqEÌ,âD\ÄM ˆˆ™1q3LÜÄa…85E U$œ¡‰q¢Î°FŽ1âÿ @ ›Î h ›Î II* þ V p æ p t æ î ( 2 ö ; È Ì Ì 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ?3 EÄÌD<âàÄ9"âÌ"®ˆ™Eœˆ‹¸‰£13¦Ç0q'ââ¢Ã<"""bfâLGˆqÑ‹ˆˆ˜YÄQâ"nâD BÜħ3qøÄшˆˆˆˆˆ˜™ˆcâÀ .â">ñ‰ƒwDDDDÌLÄ#.âEDœñ)DqÑEbâ"qÍ„ƒ@˜8üHÜÄ¡ÁQ”ƒ$ƒ` ÔSAY„AP„#1ƒàdœŒ'Nq S=u à†ÀÔ `²©0 !’pGDG2NŒ£AP8+ŸBôùƒA ™»À eŽ8”8-˜88„dÜÄ‘!QN5GDpœYÄA‰q‚“"b›8èÄq(qÄâGVÂÌ0ˆƒÇÄ)š’f&â¨vJÂBÌ 'Ž{‚"f† ‰‹xt"n☎ÇÄ¡ùBDÄÌÑQâñ "83œã$œPœ”1 ³Æ33O ‰ˆ „Ÿ’•b¦B6f†Õ)œ9ÔPAW‰ˆ!’ ÒN$ÎÒÁC¦²F„ƒùP bˆ¡ G$)¥†Â©ã8%å]N…3D\ 1ÄP#˜8\ ’qŠÿ ‘¨2²(3”8Œ$„™M˜YÄQâ"ÎÄÁN !DDDDS fgâ‡Gè˜øă‡/r„ùCPDDÄPf0@ÍpÂÀ'!f!"rÄWfL<Å ƒˆâtFDd1ÂÌ" ñ‰ƒ‚8ÅÉ8GDDDÄÌ7}º‰‹nâL|âqŸ8„8³D‡'ÎÄEÜÄ'>ñˆ‹8爈ˆˆˆˆÿ€ € œÎ b œÎ II* þ V p æ p n æ î ( 2 ö ; È Ì Ì 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ?3 EÄÌD<âàÄ9"â,Dœ‰câàÄ'ñéwÄ*å DÌ,â("F<s1³ˆ£ÄA"b’â%>ñ"""fq {DžX”7qЉC§¢¡TPCáP*¨€Ø Žž H¢‚ *¨“©€‚ˆ""˜8è#1Ná<˜ƒÀqÑE\ÄE\l="&.Pâ"nŠŽˆžjFpœÂ¹C’( BpäÌcâ"®‘Žˆèˆ$ ŽˆÎEl¥œ î”SMáÜ)ççTS¡Ìƒ@ B‡#‚"D $8:"L95CÌ‚"""f†9ñ‰C#âÌ"®ˆY"!Ž‰ƒ‚¸#"³038q”8èÄM œ8EDðèÌ`BÂqx$|Uq¢8#•#JgAŒ“œg8Qœ¸DÄ""â4Nã舦¶³À .âq%Dˆˆqæbå‰câ 13¦Ç0q+â LªP@Ì0 LÏP2Ná$œ©àM5ýFDD ÑPâ∈3‹¸â!‚“H‚Sø§‚rj‰jqDøħ‹g†ˆ‹-âˆ0 ¡!D„£!(ÂSMej QA=…óæ8…ƒ˜çh$Š#"1nâ ‚M þì@0ÇNe!G"ZO ¦”8ŸŽf¸#"""Î,⊘YÄ1qðˆ˜7ÃÄM Nœˆ‹8èMÑGÄEŽ ' §p²3œà<"½Lqªd8…3œœ ã §P‘/(Oˆ™Eœˆ‹¸@ 9 O|â¦O !Nħñ#""‚!DD¾33q&%n(ñ‰£Ä!I‘BˆÈ j ”°» ¶Ü\ Ü( NÛ© Ø hb Ph& Œh¬ TgO ¸g& ögœ Ú ¬# ª9 c«w ð©% -©9 |©Ú ðÊ$ Ú ìµ2 Ú ìµ2 Ú ìµ2 × 0v c0& ¡/— Ø Q` OP& ‹P; ÛO] £‘î A £‘î A ¨]. ¨]. Ù »È 6 ¼ºô 4 ¼ºô 4 ÌÓ› ÌÓ› ÌÓ› €Ô$ ÜÁ # ÜÁ # ÜÁ # Úçƒ ƒï* ¸ð+ úòN Ù¸ Ù¸ Ù¸ × 8b O8O ´=p ?7v Ì79 <G × {M <€% xz9 Á\B = Á\B = z; hy$ aQ 2 aQ 2 u * ©z ÎwÐ ; ÎwÐ ; ªvu ; 6v9 × Ÿ Œœa ¡$ N‘¬ * ”] ”] × ¾' ½‹ ´½9 ¼b }¼# ·½œ l¶£ ¼v ©ºb $¹# ^¾: Ø ßv dß% ¡ã[ Þ: hÞM Ïß õÞL X݉ øÞ$ 3Ü% oàL ÓÛ8 "Üv Ø 7 )ÿœ Þÿ$ ÿb “ÿ7 àÿa XþK »þb 3ÿ% oý8 ¾üM "ü$ _û8 × "v d!˜ "M }!$ ¹!ˆ X a Ð ˆ o % ª % æ¯. æ¯. æ¯. æ¯. Ý =? ( %8¶ ( %8¶ ( %8¶ ( æ9® ( æ9® ( Ø ¨p Ù sa Qr% Œqv v' UqL à p - à p - <“; “$ ~’] 0 ë ²Í € É ³Úð C ³Úð C Ø ; ž + ; ž + ? ¸s" âr ýrn …œg …œg …œg …œg § "›8 1 › o ' › o ' › o ' Ÿ ;žL ;žL %¸ 8¸ S· s¹P s¹P ι ι uµ= ^Æ êÏR êÏR ræq ræq ræq êå 7å ¾ ¡³ O ¿ C O ¿ C O ¿ C ¦ ½ ) Û ¾ B Û ¾ B Û ¾ B R» 2 ‹º - F Ü \ Ü A \ Ü A ¦ Ú ! ¦ Ú ! Ï Ù X | ÷ Ÿ ö O gõ † ² 1 ¯ N hL “L µ m “j “j ² ‹ j ¥ ³ Ç iÅ zZ? ? ²C B › H( ( É qC & É qC & _x b6ó4 qò4 qò4 «óJ %ð 7r 7r £Ñì & £Ñì & šÍ3 §? ðüZ Sø3 Žö- ¨ Õ $ …. …. ÆP ªF¹ # ªF¹ # ªF¹ # @ž= @ž= AÀ q¾C q¾C ½¾= »D »D j¼* žºO žºO Bã sâ@ ¾á/ C u u ’< Ö ò ƒ ƒ ƒ C+ s*> s*> º*C &W g&9 uP ˜M' ÈL ×K òJL òJL IGz IGz IGz ur! Ÿp\ Ÿp\ mU fm8 §mT n w–S Ó—9 • 0’ O] O] ¶% x·Q Òµi Òµi C³2 ‚² ›± GÝ yÜ@ yÜ@ yÜ@ ÉÙ ââ ÿÚ á 8Ù, nÚ ‰Ö ©ÖH ©ÖH ûÛ yþ) « Èü< B B [ú- ’ ±øH ù" z#G Ê"& ù b ù b d s d s ß ï# 8 {EE {EE {EE ÈFK A% MA< “@ A É?5 |iT |iT Ûg9 f f Gb° Gb° Gb° KŒ ƒU ƒU à’E ~° ¤¯H €Ò £Ô) £Ô) €ö ¦õJ ¦õJ ùóu ùóu ùóu ùóu ùóu vñ Cl¤ " õjV ! Vi? ¢f• " ¢f• " DÙ " DÙ " (™B # wš& ²™; ú—o ú—o Eϱ " Í. ! ?Ìe ! °Ê_ # Fÿ1% Fÿ1% Fÿ1% ƒý= # Ðý$ G4Y ! G4Y ! 5 À2' ø2 Z/? " ¦-1 ! þƒ L# œ~ Ù, - ¡, , È, EÇ kÇ$ Ùp ÷ ¶ñ Óé& Óé& Óé& ë+ Dê> C B • d 7 ǧ!BDDDDDDÇ$qgžrD¹ˆ‹¸è".ž !ŠS8'gâl©$ñÃ!Q8å<(ÜBDDDDDÓ5'ãdœÂ"Î3 D ÇG2qÜÍOˆƒ`ˆ~B …A‰O\ÄñÄSAĵ4>‚ˆ B#šª"Fd-âJ…è"]ìðO\<qFä˜ B„!°‡FDDL¹ "Â$¤·#'AÄ'n¢©Q7Îq±ÍqÖHÆ !L<,ò $>Ó'>]¹H`Ñ8"f刈HXIž.úl±š#â„™8ÒÆÄMœ °¼‰Oœ:…#ÑãPLáAÁå gÎ]2q B…Ö8øˆèè !Zq”Ž$fäIΟjˆ¡„1‰‹8&ÒƒˆW2q†B§pÇG„) Bs%€ 0q$Š-â&ÎÍq 縉[Há ‡ CHAöÿý …ˆˆˆˆ‘ØJ†ˆ ŠV´@ Œ˜Ò%<ñ‰£Ä™xÄM\ÄÅq ×Ò-á„?q-„ ¤p„„ˆˆq&>q" ñˆO<â&EN!h!"qHlâƒ`)&NÄ…1 ±§ÏG —9 ä†0E2NÆ)7ˆ&R¸4ÃÇ ÍÔ†S8’CÑ•4 ÅCAÑ &î!DDDDÄ8‰ˆ›8&!>ñˆO\ÄQâ&~D0åˆ.DD˜êˆ ñ…‰/L<â&nĬoâ !…#!™øÄ'NħŸCá„…`êÅqE$Ž@&>”8B/bœãŽ’1"˜B¡è¬E8=ºˆOœ‰‹> 7qEK† )RøA ÅB„ˆ÷GÔDDDÄ Ê9ÑE7 Ó'Ž‰O¼„ùîîãc”„ˆˆA”3|ÓKØ~A®ˆˆˆÄVj ‚02&®TgA #vÂâ‡#"bD$–’J\Äa9òEŠÂA' I‘g+"@ @ {< – {< II* þ W p æ p ¢ æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED O ‘|ùÆO5J<âDŸ¡ˆƒNÌ?â<GüÏQœ£øÿܬŠÿÏq¸‰{D ?…S8ÇÏ]ˆˆôÇ ‚@I ‰sˆ1 Ñt "ã„ã.j@h*$ªP*qÑÍG§Äxâ¦q2Â">BDãð PD⌅ÄaЦ¸ &ŽAPâ8ÃÉ8‚‰³G1"¢…h"GˆùщøĉøÄÄ#ÎÄ™8&>ñ:"""˜âMáb‚sœ(NÆaâ÷ˆ Є 縉c‰G '}DDL¡óEŸ¸ˆñ‰3ñ韾ÁiœãL>^A‚D}A‚Ìq4$2q ÖˆƒA#˜¸!¬ ñ(1 &~È l¥…FÄü‰‹øÄ#>qC”Ó81ÎqBqÂkDDDDDÄ|G¢ˆ ÐÈV¨Ì'â AX¢Âm áDåD 1å"QQ(Ÿ‰Áéˆ8Y΋@ ) F¢Žˆ VÂ]ÄE|âçƒuÖq®ˆˆ˜@J0J?å&N–8N„2„£©WÄI¥x5 |< & |< II* þ W p æ p 2 æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED '°HVí 1©(”¸ŠÂA +1 A „ Wwr0$ÂÂSÁrÊ!â²dâ".Œ°Ð!ècÂL¼Ñ凈‹N¼ˆgøGÌ ñX”ƒèJá drÐ#¢A +6-ˆ‹0çVÙˆQàxbc"8Ÿ¨àÄ5Ó8Žˆ§˜ qáˆh-f×äQQx‰~ ñ‰›nDCCPÄ âE'!U D\̺8 Dœ1""N1ÃÄ#.âïÿˆˆ8Et1D<†#"â8'úÄ™øÄEÜÄ' ñˆqEä ƒ1‰ˆ)q”øÄÛ4 """"NÒM<â(qgâG‰3qEDDDDL‚é".âGˆOÜÄE<â">ñˆO|âøY„ˆx BDÄgâgâËĉ8G4q®‘Â-" 4 9A C å Q ä ž" å ê! å 7" æ „ æ Ñ! ç µ! Nöa Äöw Põ– õ9 góM Í÷" ó% Eõ5 °I L w7 Ū 8 ïœ ¤ 7 ó– G: þ@L cF ŒCL î@# (@u µ@M F% T?9 ¥Et 1?" ¯g9 gL dgK Çf7 fª ðfN Tes áf6 ®œ bŒb Ú“% ‹Ò Ž TŒ‡ TŒ‡ ®²Û Ÿ²K µ$ =²$ yµn ²! U²‡ U²‡ ®ØÆ Ø# ÈÙ6 ßK yÙ` óØI óØI TØ_ ÍØM ¯ÿ eÿI Æÿ› zÿ9 ÊÿL /þK ‘þK õþ9 Fþ7 °,œ b,œ %L {%l '4 V%J ¹%9 %s %s °L7 RL bR: ´Nr >Ja ¶Q2 Ns4 Ÿso =qN ¡w9 ñs7 Bp7 ’p† ±˜ˆ P˜7 ž—v +—9 {—7 Ë—€ j—7 ¸šb 2_ ®Ä& ê½a e¿0 ´¿" ñ½I S½€ ò½$ -Ã9 ~¼œ 1¼N æ ! æ i" ç ç N! ç š" . d/Š /0 U/J T E ¸ ; !2@ ߃‚ ÈØØ(ì"Y¤jˆØØs:@ >ì"Y(ì"YÔ=P Æ E ·A " ù k ü Ð ¬· b %¼ & dµ 7 °· n =´ ¨ ´ q MÝ a ÃÝ w OÝ — Ý I Ý I zÛ a òâ & ¬Æ ˆˆ )7 wa ï K R % 9 ßZ L*4 )o ?(! x.9 É'J ./" h(J Ì.r W/% °N! ëOX bNr Q8 QN7 Oa O$ SPœ Ot °uJ uJ v{% ²u7 u7 Qw8 ¢uL wa {ua ó|% ¬›x ;›‰ Û›J =J ´›N œM }Ÿ# ¸œ7 7 °ÂY Nëa Äëv Pë— ì Têr âêI Dê7 ®› aM Ç^ >J Ÿ: ïL Tˆ ô2 O7Å )7n È6u U66 £8œ X=% ±[! ì[J ì[J Ob vba ïc8 >\9 \9 ÞcJ ?\u Ìc% ]6 Xd9 °‚! ê‚` Southold Town Board of Appeals -32- Jun~ 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. PUBLIC HEARINGS: SOLWIN INDUSTRIES LTD. APPEAL NOS. 2971 and 2975. Applications of SOLWIN INDUSTRIES LTD., c/o Esseks, Hefter, Cuddy and Angel, Esqs., 108 East Main Street, Riverhead, NY for: [1] a Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90A, for a "windmill farm" to be located on premises zoned "C-l", and [2] for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90 and Article VIII, Section 100-80 for: (a) permission to construct towers exceeding the height limitation of the zoning code and (b) an interpretation of Sec- tion 100-90A to the effect that a "windmill farm" is a permitted industrial use in this "C-i" zone. Location of Property: Off the north side of Main Road, East Marion, NY; bounded north by Tomias and East Marion War Memorial Association; west by Koch and others; south by Begora (or Brown), Ketcham and others; east by Terry. County Tax Map District 1000, Section 22, Block 3, Lots 11, 12, 14 and 15. The Chairman opened both hearings simultaneously at 9:36 p.m. and read the legal notices of hearing pertaining to these applications in their entireties and the applications, which were filed with the Office of the Town Clerk on April 12, 1982. The Chairman asked that anyone wishing to speak shall speak into the microphone and state their name for the record, and that questions should be addressed to the board directly to prevent counterproductiveness. MR. CHAIRMAN: Mr. Esseks, would you like to speak in behalf of this application? WILLIAM W. ESSEKS, ESQ.: I anticipate that I'll do this on more than one evening. SOMEONE FROM THE AUDIENCE: I can't hear you. MR. ESSEKS: Well, I'll speak as well as I can. ANOTHER PERSON: Here's the microphone. MR. ESSEKS: Ail right, he asked that'everybody be nice, and I ask that everybody be nice, or else we can do it somewhere else. Ok? PERSON FROM AUDIENCE: I can't hear you. MR. ESSEKS: Well, I'm sorry if you can't hear me. I'm speaking quite loudly now. Let me try -- Let's try to make it as easy on each other as we can. It does not come as a surprise to me that probably everyone except for my clients who are here is opposed to the applica- tion...probably mostly out of ignorance -- it's our fault for not explaining it well enough in advance. And so I'm hoping that I will be able to speak tonight, hoping that I'll be able to speak other nights...and our engineers will be able to meet with you on a smaller basis. I'm hoping that if you have experts who are going to testify this and other meetings in opposition, that they will meet with our people. And then when it's all through, either we'll convince you or you'll convince us to go away, one or the other. Now, let's try and understand the parameters of what we're trying to do and why we're here at this time. Southold Town Board of Appeals -33- June 17~, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeals No. 2971 and 2975 - Solwin Industries Ltd.) MR. ESSEKS continued: Many years ago, Mr. Latham mined sand and gravel and other things from the earth out of this property...about 26 acres at East Marion. And the Legislature...the Town Board of this Town in its legislative wisdom decided to make this property industrial. The property all around it was residential. This property is zoned in an industrial fashion. If it were not zoned in an industrial fashion, my clients would not have contracted to buy it from Mr. Latham and they wouldn't be here and you people could be home doing something else on this warm night. But the Town did zone it in an industrial fashion, and we did contract to buy it and we want to use for what we think is a legal use. Let me try to explain it to you, and I hope I do a reasonably good job. You will all find out. Now, there are certain things I am going to say that I hope are just facts; and nobody will doubt the truth of them, and then there are certainthings I want to say that are argument, and you are all entitled to your opinion as you may disagree with me. But it is factual that the property is zoned industrial. And pursuant to your zoning ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-90, certain things can be done on this property today as a matter of right no matter what anybody says...and if you don't like what I say about what can be done about the property, your remedy is to buy it or to get the Town Board to change the zoning. It's probably easier to try to get the Town Board to change the zoning. It's probably easier to try and get the Town Board to change the zoning than it is perhaps to buy it. But you can do virtually anything on that property right now because this Town in its wisdom has decided that an industrial zone that you can do anything that's legal. That's what it says in the ordinance. Now if you want a Special Exception, let me read the things you can do if you get a Special Exception...an abattoir... acetylene gas manufacture...acid manufacture...arsenal, asphalt manufac- turer...glas furnace, coke ovens, crematorles, fireworks manufacturer... ore reduction...potash works...rolling mill...saltworks...sauerkraut manufacture.., those are the things that you can't do unless you get a Special Exception. Well, we don't want to do those things. We want to have a windmill farm. Now, I believe that it's true, and this was argued, you don't have to keep my word for it...but I think I'm reasonably accurate. You can check with your own lawyers or you can read the book yourself. I talked to the members of the board. I believe that we can have a windmill farm on that property tomorrow by going with a building permit and putting up our windmills, and I think we can have a heck of a lot of windmills. But they'd have to be under 35' tall. And I have brought with me, and I've delivered today to the Board and I apologize to the board for delivering it today... I should have delivered it weeks ago, but I didn't and that's my fault and my client is suffering because of my tardiness in delivering it. I've delivered up to a 20+-page report from my client. So it's my client's theory, but a lot of the facts are from the Federal Government and the State Government in the publications they make to the State and Federal Energy Departments. And I'm going to make that report available to anybody who wants it...( ) with the cost of money to reproduce it. If you end up agreeing with me and perhaps with the Town to allow yourselves to appoint some people to be on a com- mittee to meet with us, between this meeting and the next meeting and Southold Town Board of Appeals -34- Jun~ 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeals No. 2971 and 2975 - Solwin Industries Ltd., continued:) MR. ESSEKS continued: other meetings, perhaps you could all take the opportunity to read these reports and understand them, and perhaps you will be less fearful and you might even be interested if you think it's a good idea. The situation is that if we have...we want a certain amount of cower out of that property, and it's zoned so we can have a windmill farm there. But we can't just put a windmill farm because we're bored...we have to do it in order to make money because we're going to sell it to LILCO, and LILCO has agreed to buy it ... at a very nice profit for us. But there's a question of how much is it going to cost. If it costs $100 to produce $10 of electricity, we won't do it. We'll do something else. We'll use the money somewhere else. Now, would you read this report and when you talk to the experts about the subject, you'll find that there's a very strange ratio...the higher you go, the more power you get. I didn't know that...that's not my job. But that's supposed to be a true, scientific principle and if it's true, our clients have a good argument. If it's falso, our clients should save their money and go somewhere else and do something else with their energy. But if our clients are correct and if the Federal Energy Commission is correct, if the State Energy Commission is correct, and the higher you go, the more energy you get, we can by building towers by having fewer towers higher up get the same amount of energy, or we can have more towers lower down to get the same amount of energy. What we have to do is, the higher we go the cheaper it is for us. The lower we go, the more units we have to have. So we have to multiply and divide and get a lot of calculators and mathmaticians and economists and see whether we can put up enough towers below 35' and we can without having to come here to make enough money to justify the whole project. Now, we believe that we can't make the amount of money we need to go ahead and do this unless we have 40 towers 110' tall, and also ten towers 150' to hold water. Let me tell you how it works: The windmills are there and these are not bladed windmills. I can't pronounce the thing they are but when you look at the report and you see the models, you'll see there are cylinders that spin and they're stacked with 12 to a tower, three tubes, four in each tube, and I should know how wide they are but I don't. But they spin when the wind hits them. Now~ when they spin they generate power to the ground and that pumps water up into the ten water towers, that when the wind stops the water is released from the water towers and drives the turbine. The theory is that the wind blows a certain percentage of the time, and the rest of the time the water comes down out of the water towers and causes the turbine to work to supply electricity. As a back-up which they will do if the situation warrants, there'll be a diesel gener~to~ there. That is not a necessary, but it is a logical thing in order to have a constant supply between wind, water and the diesel to supply the energy to a~community that wanted to contract to buy it, or to LILCO. ô ˆ † i …… t ¤ N û ¬ ? C© ³ C© ³ Ð = JÐ M û õ 1 4ó n Ú G ) Kz ¨| -; rm rm Ñ1, 1: K/m K/m TÅ ÞÄ/ Âj ‹¿» î] í( Fê¨ ½ w< v( 3t? ¾ Âe ,Á RÁ` ½¿7 À éP çE håF À ~ G 0 „ K $[* ˆW\ Tl „Sa ‰~0 Â~` *{S ˆx~ w/ ‰¢Â ‰¢Â ‰¢Â ‰¢Â  ÷@ õ/ Fô^ à C2 @ ˆ?Q âE2 <H m;! –:( É8v H8L ž5O ö4 4o ”5 ³0> ù/h Ä Žm :Œ8 |Œ< À‰z À‰z Å Ú² Ø2 ¼×( îÔw nÕN ÄÑP Ñ AÑo ·Ït 4Ô \ˤ Í *ÇY Æ ? 2y ·ý6 ùü ü Jû: øu ÷8 L÷ qôy óó ó( Hñi ¹ï€ MïC šî Æ 06 (o z$z þ#/ 5!v ´ 8 õ ; 8 M Ž#B Ú# , ; ] ¢† 3 ]3 Å OQ V AU+ uK{ ! JE PHG H= è>6 $ (E? Ç : œ ) ) [£ r˜¹ 5—> }/ ´•D ša È ê æ ñ/ é= eï/ œæ„ +åR †ã/ ¿é, óáL Iã iÞ„ iÞ„ ‚T) D ÖFÊ E ¶HM E Ë ªS '© E¦q Á§ Ë Ð VÍP °Í ÓÍp Ì @k Ì @k ˜ cmð?cm |ƸVXö¢T ` ÿ *…ATT´ çú a: W T uÚ ` çú !2@ ߃‚ ÈØ©&(¬`YTåiˆØ©&s:@ >¬`Y(¬`YÔ=P n uÚ ` ž ¸] 4 F æ ( G ' x$( “TL ) ûT * >– ( ôF ( VŽ ) Åÿ * /Åá / 4Å0 ) pÅ& ( Æü2 Æü2 Æü2 Æü2 Ð(Š q(w q(w ÕN‡ pO NL Øl1 Øl1 m m An? An? Žnn Žnn V p Ö „ R „ R é e g A ¶ Ñ ^ qx , ƃ£ . ˜š— + pµ ( pµ ( pµ ( {–h {–h `×g `×g ¡‚> X´m + z¦H ͬ î®3 ³ß‚ ³ß‚ Àú‘ ¸p ¸p ×2g Ý@$ Ðjd Úx! ̆æ ЕJ úÑ úÑ %ÚS %ÚS w T w3 w3 w3 ¥+ J B ÷\6 2 B áŽO 1 ¡²p d ¡²p d ¡²p d ½/ ¢ C £] D ££ C ¤ç D ¨, C –q B Áól Áól Áól ” 9 ¡H ¡H l01 ®2# á56 -) -) ¨? C êe- êe- «… C «Ë B « C ¬U B š C ®ß C ¯$ D x… - # µv 7 {¬ - {¬ - ±° ' 8q 8q Ï Ï <ˆ £›0 <´ ' =Ü <ñ ' < =/ <C ŸÇ) « ŸÇ) « XÄ tÆ Ã# Ã# à$ hõ" hõ" ™]+ ™]+ `r _„ ê ¯ vó | r @ † † † ëú ¹ ëú ¹ ëú ¹ Q ~ ( ñ ) O ‡ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED é@BWÄ©uß!P0ñ‰›øÄE\ÄQ®ä"ªtWd â(F˜Bâ›%N FËÔ€@2…s iœÂ VÙA A BD4EÑ„&NÄáÄa9Ž)A Äø|8q”8jê…K GˆxÄ ŠŽ“3"O YpSNqœ‡)â$4ˆ A ÑÄ'I\\d³ÅñísD J â0=ñˆˆxŽé ‡ÞÈpä8…''á„æ9bë Gˆ#ÄbÇÄáÄ9úfb. §pD4q÷B† ÁÇsL+â¾e §†ob M âèB$>"ˆÂ© ‰Â©§Pæ aà–ñˆˆç˜Ž‰Ã‚¸o™TSA‘¸8Ó#ŽGn$ŠƒDÂ)IH\ „ˆ©jˆÆI8""‚#ÂÄ™øÄ™¸É#²""â9âPâ‚|Däqô–È”s˜81L Œ#"aÑEòl â° AÄéœ(Žˆ ß” (¨WЕ8èÄ!ÄN_èI8""L\G˜Z(œ¢SŒ9˜¸ 0"’®“˜#ºè".¶Ø".â¢câ7qpÂÈDáq_‚A#BZˆÈ"$®-BCˆ& ˆ(NŒÓ8…3\ÄE ',©ò!"""_ùH'©œ h(ÑE]ô‰O\Œ‰G ×Ã0ÔZB,D„ˆˆ‡M %Ž&ã‰G|âpâLœQ0å”Cˆ8Oâ¸ÀxË&.â".â" *âI‚EÝøx>œ7oª)œÂ©L5…S8…S8å ºXÄ]ô‰ ‚n4„HŒB M ‚Pâ¡9Žˆ4Žd ‘ Ï7qØÜHã„ã„RŒ˜RšBtЉƒq&©f8ÇM|âq‡‡MDL5ED0•© b ‡D<¤”SNáÔQ".Žè".âºK‚†Dœ IÄI¾BD4"Þ ÂbëaúôÏ— „–šÂA ±Åž!¶è¢‹®G„#""†`Ùø0Ç‘P A DBœÂGSEDfe„H¦SNXÅ ‘<Q-<OlÑ ŠãÉ8ãÐL5<…èÀ nâ&:qGb2Nã&Ž3É©Bi %Š'NÄQâD<â">qLŸ84O˜Â)·© ‰ã ¨e BDxDD !Z …Äužÿñ<=À)gN5…SG §Ž*ÐMH†A ™!¼(L ›ß .} ? ¾Q] Q] ð²Q] €²Q]h € ð @ p¿Q] ¸¿Q]`¿Q] IÅA 8 @ x¼Q]à¾Q] @ šþB èÿÿÿ ¹B @ 0@Mm¸@Mm@AMmÈAMm £lš|T<J²tÐ ž` ÿ (ùC`¤ _ù O: M :( Þ Ö× II* þ V p æ p ê æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 2001:09:23 14:30:47 Paperless 1999 Paperless 1999 'CÄÅZÄcO\”+"""bºˆ5qLÜÄ'.âŠhĈ¹ˆ¸ÈE\ôE5ˆˆù*4#HZ ‚ÀÌ„Ä%e‘( Žc†3œòH—)1â³D\üD…‘6ÁTP’@d‚* §qÎâ0 ’4–( ‚ ‘Eˆˆˆ˜! gNãÄœBØbLŠˆG\ô‰ÇGÄÅ™xYD\ÄE\Äe ’áÄõú ‚þ?ŸøÄÿÿÿ qý?qáÿˆÿq¤BôñNáâAÿ‡ ã™…ÿCÄE\¼‰+öG≠GDËÄkâ(úCx5”© …à!QN…$AÄõS8…CH|zÄ)†ÐÛ´ÀB<" ÁÔ AS8$4µR8…CÄ¥)œÂ!èÿ?þ;""˜8 AÐãñÿNáNá ‚@†"®ÿ ×ÿOáN!(œÂ) ‚þÿ#’q§pDD'ÆÄ#>}üS8E§q‰ã´‰?D\?u²sœãA¸@(Q ñOáT%LáAƒOáqˆ„ãP|úÿS8…S8å‰Yÿÿÿ#š¸@PDD$ÌqŽ#âÊ) Ã)œÂ)œ:ç8„ q׉8ƒ(|DD DÜÄáø?¢A )œ §ªÆÿ'!xDñˆA§œÂ!ÿ'. AS8…S8U„ˆˆ˜Â¡ÿÈ,""’p0=âG‰ë?‚)œÂ)œÂ)œ"S8ýãÄ!t`ˆ0…C ¤4…#.b.‹ˆ‹¸@”‚Â)\ÄÅžø ˆã0q1”®"A_ƒA„Ž>þCú(ÚˆHá â‚ ÿÿ!/BDœ¡ããf‹mâÓSWü?…CÐ’ˆ›øÂÄáÿ‰ëÿ™E\Äõ Y ‚""""þ§p §p §2…sœNáqýÇÿ‰ „ôÿÿÿsúÿÿÿˆÿÿÿ'®ÿÿÿϘeŽþÿ×ÿ-ˆ‡@ÐÿÿAÿßñúƒ ÿ(}ß å|t||⊈‚ ‘> Dœ#ý¦œÂ!èwÁHáq… ñÿ† xüÿ?ÂÿÿŸ¸êˆÿ?BôÿÿÿÿŸ•þCÐO¡ÿÇÿlÅOÜÄ qÿÿ A£‰ 2ñ…¨ÿÿÿ% "þÿ×ÿAÿÿÿ‡ÿÿÿ)|ý?þ˜B ?]Ä# 'âCÿ) D|º’q G„ ÄB] ‚¡Á°†) ‚† ˆˆÿ¥p §p†ø!èÄõ_"ŠS8Ç) G< Ó'.â/"ú waX£A’¤£§p §p ‡R` §pˆ¸2”ãÄøÿ‡ üDˆÿÿ‘q §p 'Áÿÿÿ Southold Town Board of Appeals -38- june 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeals No. 2971 and 2975 - Solwin Industries Ltd., continued:) MR. EDEEN: Objections to what you said, no. RICHARD OSBOURNE: My name is Richard Osbourne, and it seems to me those of us who are here came prepared and we had less knowledge than this gentleman had to be prepared, and it seems to me we're here and we're way over time and we have to say what we have...so I don't see any need for a recess. If he had gotten his papers here on time, we all would have seen them and you would have known what they're talking about... delayed tactics and trying to wear us down by getting us to come back, and back, and back, is not something that we should be subjected to. That's my objection. MR. CHAIRMAN: Before I make a statement, is there somebody else that wanted to say something over there? Could you just hold one second-- I'll be right with you. Ok? This goes back to the other comment, Mr. Esseks. It is the natural opinion of this board to grant one recess. We probably will not grant another one, ok. The reason being that we have a tremendous agenda, and I know this doesn't affect you personally but if affects our board and the town because we have many, many people who want variances and special exceptions throughout the summer, and it becomes extremely necessary to clean many of these hearings up within two meetings. So I sincerely hope you will be prepared at the next-- not the next but the following meeting to present the entire case. MR. ESSEKS: I will. MR. CHAIRMAN: YOU will? Ok, thank you. Mr. Cron, did you have anything else that you wanted to say? MR. CRON: If I understand you correctly that you're granting the recess to put intheir entire case the next time this is scheduled? Is that correct? MR. CHAIRMAN: That's the way the board felt, sir. MR. CRON: Ok. That's all I want to know. MR. CHAIRMAN: Ail right, sir, you had a question? Could you state your name please? OTTO UHL, JR.: My name is Otto Uhl, Jr. I have a homesite in East Marion on which I am going to build. My property overlooks this property, the use of which is being discussed this evening. I want to add something to this height variance applied for, raising it from 35 feet to between 110 and 150 feet. The only thing I want to see higher than 35 feet in this area is the steeple of a church. Does anybody agree with me on that? (Audience clapped their hands.) Do you agree with me. Ok. That was a good response. You know, this is an important issue affecting all of Southold Township setting a precedent if approved. And especially bothersome to the East Marion people. We don't want our area looking like a Texas oil field. How high is the Greenport Water Tower, does anybody know? MEMBER DOUGLASS: 90+ feet. MR. UHL: Ninety something feet. Well, that's going to be high because WH ‡Z ®W> úW( ¥ ~Ÿ M~3 ˆ‰ ~ E~¿ ~ 1~( eH ¹ Ý~E +~] “~ ,†E |~ ~( Ó~O ¤ ¥3 ã ( ¥… ®¦E ¥X w¦o ó¥( *¥O ‡¥3 Ç' ý¥† ’¦E å¥Q D¨P ¢¥K ú( ¥ ÍJ û Ð !Í\ †Ð_ ñÐO MÍ qÍ( ¥ÍV Î( JÎ _Í> ©Í? óÍp oÍ; µÍi (Í) ]ÍŸ Í ¥ õZ ÷ -÷) `÷m ÖôÀ ô. Ùô> "ü ;÷l ±ôH ô? Mô( €õF ÑôQ -ô’ ¥ ? ï ( F N žX = _¤ | –¤ D G ˜¤ F’ ¥ BZ CW oB‘ Cd ¥ i9 è iˆ zq3 ¸i; ýj¤ ¥ ·M ¥ ·M ¥ Þ] Þ! 8ÞZ ßX Þz ˆÞ! ³Þ¤ aÞ| êÞ æ3 ¥ ¹ h3 £F ôe d/ ž 8 \( N ç w { ) HŸ ñ ¥ -Z , .,' a-A , Ñ-A ,E i, ’,. Ë,[ 04- h-m à4 ù-” –- »,m »,m 340 l-\ Ò-5 ¥ U… 5U* hU, ŸUW U5 ?\‹ Ô\| [U* U¯ IU\ ¯UZ U5 SUk ¥ {n {I r{| ú{4 8{s ¥ £? ï ¢ ¢( F£N ž¢X £= _¢¤ ¢| –¢¤ D£G ˜¢¤ F¢’ ¥ ÉZ ÊW oÉ‘ Êd ¥ ð9 è ðˆ zø3 ¸ð; ýñ¤ ¥ >L ¥ >L ¥ e] e! 8e¥ çe’ ‡ez e! 7e¥ æe| þ EÎ ¥ o h o c o c Wo ¦ •w (– N €• & €• & ±• o ¤ Õ µ fÔ b ÒÕ ýÔ !Ô ' SÕ N «Õ < ðÔ k eÔ ( ˜Õ N ðÔ Q K× oÔ „ ÿÔ ! )Ô Ž ÃÔ M ¥ û Æ û ) û ü @ Fû iû R Äû ( øû ’ ·û E û e vû šû ( Íü N &û < mû b ×h Jû d ¹û 2 ¤ "= ë "M C"! m"M Å" é"> 1"U ’"/ ¤ Jµ dI' –JN îIP HQ: ‹I_ õQ/ .IG ƒQ ©I• JL nIa ØI; I< dIQ ¿IO ¥ x Ê p’ gp ‹p( ½p[ $qG xp œp( Ðq@ p ?qA ŠpE Ùx þx/ 7s` £sI ùp7 <p[ ¢x ÈpU ¥ —] — /—( c˜A ¯— Ó˜A —K v—; ¼—h .—& _—< ¥—I úŸ —ˆ ´—+ é—; .—B {Ÿ ¥ ¿… 6¿= }¿ §¿_  1¿( d¿u ä¿ ¿' :ÀN ’¿Q î¿. (¿= p¿ ™¿ #¿ G¿< ¿E Ý¿/ ¤ æ9 ç æL >æ< „æŒ î ?æ' qçN ÉæQ $î: hæŽ î@ Mæ€ Ùæ æ ¥ ¹ h 3 £ ( Ö„ dU Ä- ü… Œ* ÀJ @ \C ª ѱ . Ç ( ¥ 4 24} º<' ì4[ P4p Ë< ð4| w4& ¨4< î4; 24t ±4 Ô43 4U q[Ò L[s Ê[F ò\¾ ò\¾ ò\¾ ò\¾ q‚Ò L‚s Ê‚F ƒ® ƒ® ƒ® ƒ® qª@ º©Ž º©Ž Sª| qÐF ÁÐ æÐs p÷N È÷? ÷F p N È ? F qG@ ºFŽ ºFŽ SG| rmc ßnc Kms ÉmG r”c ß•c K”s É”G q¼@ º»Ž º»Ž S¼| ¤ ãI ø ã+ .㥠Üã¹ Ÿâ2 Ùâ( ãN dâQ ¿â\ %⊠»â Uâ[ ºã ¥ ^ 0 f ¡ ƒ / ¢ Ü p U ( ˆ N à L S * ˆ . À ( ó O M ¤ 0M ü 0/ 50> }0I Ñ1F !0€ ¬0ž W0 0 £0— E0; ‰0( ¼0u <0 `0' ’1N ¥ X~ /W/ hW ’W ¥ ¦ T ¬ ÒÖ5 ¬ ¬ ° ý&Ô=P T Üi Ü ¬ ëÖ5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T ái ž Ý ¬ ×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T æi Ý ¬ $×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T ëi Ý ¬ >×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T ði Ý ¬ ^×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T õi æ Ý ¬ {×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T úi ž Ý ¬ Ÿ×5 ¬ ¬ ° ØÔ=P T ÿi Â Þ ¬ ½×5 ¬ ¬ ° ØÔ=P T j ž Þ ¬ Ù×5 ¬ ¬ ° ØÔ=P T j † Þ ¬ ò×5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T j Î Þ ¬ Ø5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T j Š Ü ¬ )Ø5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T j Þ ¬ -Ø5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T j Ä Þ ¬ Ù5 ¬ ¬ ° ¹&Ô=P T j Ä Þ ¬ Ù5 ¬ ¬ ° û%Ô=P T j Þ ¬ Ø5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P T j Š Ü ¬ )Ø5 ¬ ¬ ° ©&Ô=P Ä t Ì x $ Ð|(Ô€,ØøÚž ¾Ò` ÿ (ùCŒŠ K@ î # è $g II* þ V p æ p ô æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ‰-žxbVDÄ?÷ˆÝ¾a+bú<Ÿtâ` ñ11bÝt„¸ˆ£ÄA"‹1!"B %Ž‰›øÄqD0%"bB˜¸ˆ3qL\ÄâG‰ãˆˆˆˆ˜‡G t4""&DÄ'Nô‰Oœé">qâHDDDDÄ„@éLœ‰Gœ‰3qGDDĉC|qqÄOÄÅG;"„0h„!(LÜ‘°D5õ"bB& ñº¡ÄƒˆàDp2 $DDSO1 Á Ó'Î牸Øbˆ.ÂâB˜ qPÄ9¢™¸@5]Œ¡W ¦µ@„ˆ¡ÄGâÁô‰‹¾!¤‹}°Ð DDÄ„$âLÜ 0câ˜8g⊈ˆˆˆ'Dôè(=ââ&#"L!"L=q+q qA#"W!"&J|†‰ßÄ' qL\ÄE\ô#"""""¦Âôˆ OÌt"ŽŸ8J !NÄM\™¢SNEŽDá1CÔ ˜¸ˆ›8¤#Ž.#æ‚rD\ !/ÀP‹r$’}2Îq ?ñ•¸"É‚©à£6HQ…IF‚ˆ;ûŽ‹¨¦œÂA¨C†‚pD$|w‚(œ ŽSO5µ˜z*(‡°¡IR¤ !¡ P„ ü¦j„„ ñ#þÿÿÿ •{ü? T $g Ú t¿5 ° ©&Ô=P %g ¢ %g II* þ W p æ p ® æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ÿçö‰‹x ±`âGœX(q^GL ¦Ã#ž/â3O¼ˆˆg%úÄ1qÓ¡ÄâG""""&†ˆ3qÓâ(q8GDDDL B %Ît&ÎÄ‘ˆ˜:&JÜÄ!ÄâG›z!"bÁÄшs>—™Å{ºˆ‹¸èŠN] !ñA ‚!"b ‚64C‚@~'.â">qG#"∈ˆˆˆ‰Áq†Ó8¡ä Ñ\B &Ž@‰ñ‰O %>q?"š¢%†‰CéP&ÎĈˆ˜&.Jœˆ›83&Ž#"""&&âxÄ' ñ‰G<â'âqEDDDDDDLŒ‰G|âPâ&>q”8ÑM‚@BdQbÀbâD\Ä'ŽuÊ©§jê 0„câAPL|ˆ‡%È|qDSBâ &>dÔáàNvx ƒÁ*´ ŠR BT‰'ÑE|Yé"®Ä!""!"""b+ÎUŒˆƒN B<âL S Ä`âHŒˆO\Äa ‘‹câgâ(ñˆ‹.âp‰®ˆˆˆˆˆ‰1q1&>ñè7CÄM|â˜xĈˆˆˆˆˆ‰a⢋¸éÇÄM ¥ÓÔŽ&'n Southold Town Board of Appeals -41- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeals No. 2971 and 2975 - Solwin Industries Ltd., continued:) MR. OSMER continued: we can go and meet the trains when our friends come in. There are many things to consider in this problem, and I do not think it should be taken lightly. I do not want to see this thing happen here. I think there are many other places much better suited, environmentally, physically and even economically which is what this is all about. Those of us who moved here knew about the economics of this region, you know, and we moved here with that in mind and we also moved here knowing what the zoning ordinances were. And I think in this case you should inspect them. It's much too out of line for what we need. I do have a lot more to say and am constrained to one minute. I could have written 20 pages as well, and I think they would have made as much sense to keep it short...it's getting hot and it's late. I have two letters from other people who would like to be represented here who cared enough to ge% this in to me several weeks ago, which I would like to give the board. And it states their position on what they think about this plan. That's all I have to say for now. I'm sure I'll be back in in two months-- MR. CHAIRMAN: One month. MR. OSMER: One month, it seems a long time. MR. CHAIRMAN: Ail right. We'll go back to the center. I believe some- body had their hand up. Sir? GEORGE LONG: I would like to say that I am a resident of East Marion... George Long...for the past 12 years. A question of Mr. Esseks' view on that Latham sandpit. He had made a statement there was 26 acres of mining. I think anyone that lives in the area and community resi- dents would realize that of the 26 acres I would probably estimate maybe six or seven acres would be the only thing that was mined in that area. And a proposal and the maps that have shown where he places the wind- mills that's been farmland and that's never been mined. The other question that I have and that I would like to ask the board, the ingress and egress of this area... I don't know where he proposes to use this, and I know the right-of-way that abuts the adjoining area... the legal acess is presently only 8.4 inches... 8.4 feet, right.., just trying to get it down shorter, that's all. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Anybody else from the east side? Mr. Cron? MR. CRON: I would just like to indicate to the board in behalf of Cove Beach Associates that I do oppose the recess of this particular applica- tion for the applicant to submit further proof to the board at a recessed date. I do however reserve all rights to submit whatever proof in opposi- tion at that time. MR. CHAIRMAN: Mr. Cron, I think what we will discuss with counsel during this recessing period is a time limit for Solwin Industries, because again I say to you our agenda is extremely, extremely heavy during the sunnier months as you are aware and as every other attorney in this town and every person that wants to get a variance from this board, or at least have an application for it before the board. Anybody else? Mr. Kapell? Southold Town Board of Appeals -42- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. (Appeals No. 2971 and 2975 - Solwin Industries Ltd., continued:) DAVID KAPELL: David Kapell and I appear here on behalf of Herbert Mandell, owner of a 58-acre parcel west of the proposed project. Mr. Mandell has asked me to appear and inform you that he is opposed to this project, that it is our feeling that the value of our land which we are in the process of subdividing will be greatly undermined by the proposed use, and that in fact it's my feeling that the hardship that the applicant claims will be transmitted very directly to the surrounding property owners in the form of devaluation of real estate. Thank you. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Any other, any rebuttal, Mr. Esseks? MR. ESSEKS: None. MR. CHAIRMAN: Thank you. Seeing no further hands, any questions from any board members? (None) Hearing no further comments on their side, I'll make a motion recessing this particlar hearing to the -- not the next available date but the date thereafter which will probably be the 29th of July. Please remember we do not have to advertise. MR. CRON: You're going to have to affix a date, Mr. Chairman. SECRETARY: 29th. MR. CHAIRMAN: I'll have to check with the board members, do you have any objection to the 29th of July as the following regularly scheduled meeting after July 8th? (No objection.) The board feels that the 29th of July is appropriate. We will ask the Supervisor on Monday if he will allow us to advertise it not as lengthy as it was advertised before but we will advertise it as a normal agenda item being the last hearing. MR. CRON: Does the board wish to set a time on the 29th? MR. CHAIRMAN: It will be somewhere in the area of 9 o'clock, unless I read faster, Mr. Cron. Does anybody else have any -- PERSON FROM AUDIENCE: What time? MR. CHAIRMAN: It will be in the newspaper. We will assume it will be in the area of 9:00 p.m. I wish before I close the hearing to thank everybody for their courtesy, and I would like to thank you all for coming out and regratifying the board in its deliberations after the next meeting to take everybody's interest to heart. I'll continue with that motion then, gentlemen. MEMBER GRI~NIS: Second. On motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to recess the matter of Appeals No. 2971 and 2975, app.li~a- tions of SOLWIN INDUSTRIES LTD. until July. 29, 1982. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was unanimously adopted. Southold Town Board of Appeals -43- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. At this point in time, the Chairman declared "closed session for deliberations", after making a motion for same, seconded by Mr. Douglass, and duly carried. At approximately 10:55 p.m., motion was made by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, and duly carried, to reconvene the Regular Meeting of this board. APPEAL NO. 2351. Matter of CHARLES G. and MARY A. TANGNEY. Decision Rendered December 1, 1977, for approval of access over a private right-of-way off Little Neck Road, Cutchogue. On June 1, 1982 Building Inspector Curtis W. Horton requested through our office a determination as to whether or not the condi- tions set by the board on December 1, 1977 in this matter were satisfied. On June 5, 1982, _members of the Board of Appeals re-inspected the right-of-way and found same to be elevated lower than the surrounding parcels and due to the enormous amount of rainfall recently, the right-of,way was entirely underwater. On June 8, 1982 this board forwarded a letter to John W. Davis, Engineer, requesting his recommendations, which were received on June 12, 1982. In reviewing the recommendations of Mr. Davis, it is the opinion of this board that those recommendations should be followed, and that a reply be forwarded over to Building Inspector Horton indicating the sa/Re o APPEAL NO. 2846. Matter of PATRICIA A. BAILEY. Decision Rendered November 13, 1981, which denied the relief as requested in the application dated June 23, 1981 for approval of insufficient: (1) road frontage of proposed Parcel 3 and (2) area of proposed Parcel 2, at the northwest side of Leslie Road and the east side of Bay Avenue, Cutchog~e, NY~ On June 7, 1982, our office received correspondence with enclosures giving an explanation of details between herself and the past Chairman, Mr. Grigonis. Mrs. Bailey requests reconsideration of this application and submits the amended survey dated November 12, 1981 prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. showing the square footage of the proposed par- cels and distances to existing property lines. It was the feeling of the board members not to reconsider or rehear the decision previously rendered in Appeal No. 2351; however, if Mrs. Bailey desires to submit a new application, the board would possibly consider same. The secretary was instructed to send a reply to Mrs. Bailey advising that a rehearing could not be held without unanimous vote. Southold Town Board of Appeals June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2989. Upon application of LUCY E. MICHAELS, 3570 Minnehaha Boulevard, South- old, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for permission to construct deck addition to dwelling with an insufficient rearyard setback at 3570 Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, NY; bounded north by Laughing Waters; west by Tschiember; south by Minnehaha Boulevard; east by Young; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-87-3-7. The public hearing on this matter was held earlier this evening, at which time the hearing was declared closed pending deliberations. The board deliberated, and made the following findings and determina- tion: By this appeal, applicant seeks permission to construct a 20' by 16' deck addition to the existing dwelling, leaving an insufficient rearyard setback at 30 feet from the existing bulkhead. The premises in question has approximately 60' road frontage and an average depth of approximately 134 feet. Existing on the premises is a private one-family dwelling. Along the entire length of the water-lying edge of this property is a functional bulkhead in very good condition. Correspondence has been furnished by the applicant from the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation indicating that no permit for this project is required. In considering this appeal, the board determines that the variance request is not substantial in relation to the code requirements; that the circumstances herein are unique; that by allowing the variance no substantial detriment to adjoining properties would be created; that the difficulty cannot be obviated by a method, feasible to appellant, other than a variance; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general pur- poses of zoning; and that the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance as indicated below. On motion by Mr. Sawicki, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the application of LUCY E. MICHAELS for permission to construct deck with an insufficient rearyard setback, be and hereby IS APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR in Appeal No. 2989. Location of Property: 3570 Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-87-3-7. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki. This resolution was unanimously adopted. aâˆÈ•‘'6<s !bÃaâq8q焈4NÍf‹µÈ5…#…Ó IÄÁA¢‹-©©)œŒg£–¤²ã D‰¢ "+‘¹Hˆ¸˜® 7q& q¡Ä„ˆñ‰Ogâ"Î ƒ@áqÑÍ¢ˆˆˆˆ(‰‹8 ScD>¡hÒE ôBÄS8—ƒÌp*(œÂ)œ¢B¤B!„ˆÄ5U7…@Da. Dˆ¸¸Ø#]$¢œÉ‘‚#¢!(X!›>G9@G®BŒPÄ9†MJ>R€AX‘Æ ž 8 II* þ p ` æ ` ª æ î ( 2 ö ; È Q Q 2001:10:10 09:37:49 Paperness 1999 Paperless 1999 sD\lÑÅO„µAHÆŒÄz˜8É‘YtbHbVÌB$!³ØAŒA*Ó"† ³ >¢£Ä MbDpd[ÄQ¹=‡¡ˆˆ".’•GÄHP‹¹Q'®Üh óD\ÄÅ dâ"êä"~DŽ(q0“Zˆ˜~òyÊñéD—³¢pq!C7:Âj'âEDD„ó"sâÌ qÐsÀ‰«9BœÂÉ8„ q! È£A£ÁÄcƒqL!¶šºˆ8”ìN95ŒƒJă ‰‹<¶è¢‹!â¯HAˆˆˆˆˆðÁÈa~ QT…8É">ñGMœ#âs„Hœ.Œa䉸˜E‰„NŸ.KRò`zâAN BX¢cˆP‘>q1$ÑEcv‘EÄÅ„ˆˆHÂá ¢³‚°š# cò‘ŠË]∠¨)OÄa€@(0q‰`8„ J˜nˆ.Htq%–ÎÄ1få ß”S8i¡qÁ ¡0Ã1ÁLŸ3ñ_".ú0Ã#1ÃQ-¢È6N\ô#L\ÙK1ZDŸcD$Ø1›ˆ‹8ÓE\H²"‚Ah‚•Á‰¢1‹¸ˆsCÔPjD\|‘Ȉ6ñtº#"åâPI"Ž³Qâ".R‘æ—¡‰‹¸‰‹.FäÂå8F\‘.âÐ1L¡ úQ8ƒ³E\ÄW!è#ÁqîDZÄŬDq'ŠKH€NOLœS8‚@…S™ÂÅSD4bŽ#š8ɦ9Œ rZ¶ˆ›8ÓÁÀT@R8!Α"Rå :Ø“ðarE4aŽ£œúD)‘@Ÿ 7ÝÄa…ˆˆ ǘ#â&.Ä7ñˆ‹ñˆ3ñˆ›.úÄMÜÄc-âªAˆˆˆˆÈhˆ8LÑ' q÷D|D„É8Y‘qEDDDÌ¡‹.†ˆÏñ‹r §pÊA,L\!(""bä"â󧋸bÂqŽ'.,A VˆÂN»¡`ªNG@ Gˆ0ÔˆhEO!DäÃœ¸""ò3…sœ’S™mâ&.☸ˆ›8'†é"΂x"~”ÄFDDD„#",HBpL‘á ñÙh¶!Ñ1RñÉ ™ÅFD„8TŠœ‘ Œ$q SMáÌ!â' q1[Xb‹¸ˆ A ƒˆ«Ù3ŽÉ« 8"1Nµ@ IQ¸!”S(!"$Ä-\À^ˆ@ @ Ô = II* þ p Q æ Q à æ î ( 2 ö ; È Q Q 2001:10:10 09:37:49 Paperless 1999 Paperless 1999 ¹‘Œ‰ D|†""b¾ˆ‹;ÇÚOà Gb¡ôè ÓÅFDÄž\%eˆ~äŒ!Èqå‹xĉ¸#""Ac)ÄÅÄžàadñâK”3§pjÇ)œ8S8qp²0äq´%gžˆ†pèˆÄ8>ñ‰k,p%þ ƒ‘Há8å ¦ 5„ˆ˜ä‰{‚M¼ & qf 1?vHWz ¯„E\ Ä]œ‘þØ`Ñ%!cö±‰ñ…ÇHÔEœˆqW bŠœ•Ø”ÚD)qt ù<ŒÈ~B¸(4D5å Ž¤"áDpÈd§ê Á‚ØÑE\# Y "¢9â+¦4y&>åL\tñE\q&†‰‹x ?9ÑçŠïÑ`†ˆ‹. T¨ ".âBylHÄ…Çhºðˆ1sÄa+VY”Òä™88q0I.v s„£‰8C +9 Z+k Z+k ^±} ç²/ ³k •´½ ¶Û[ Ü) Mܬ Ë 'F (' M)> Ê Â. Ã- ;à cÄM É é1 èG Uê= É ‰ \0 ¡N Ô€ Ñ— й Ç \2 ]1 H][ H][ ®^1 ë_x ƒÝ ƒÝ ƒÝ ƒÝ ƒÝ Æ ÐA Ñ. JÑU Å 3 Q è'2 %!G u! "( Ï"v O$N ¦%Q & %'q /! Ë)ž t*C Å C| Å C| Ä ‘ {’2 ¶“( é”w j–L ¿—P — <˜q ·žP ¢ )šA mœ …£( ¶… E¢ fŸV à ¸S à ¸S ¼ C¾z Ç ޺± ! Þº± ! —½s ¿; XÆ oÀ) ¥Àc Á? \Â' Ë "Ås ŸÆ9 Ä ÞH Ä ÞH ß‘ ºáY æ ?âR ›ãD éå' åH Æ +7 , &1+ Y4 /t /> I7/ €1D Í8a  xO z= z= b‚/ ™€† (}S …~ ¯ƒ) ád Q‡ r†` Ü‚/ ‚T  Ń ¨ ¼ 8 ¨ ¼ 8 {, C ¿ `V a =ar ¹c À †ƒ MˆQ ¨ˆ ̉p ¾ Óx ¾ Óx T Ư @ ¦ô ¦ô £`0 ¦ô ¦ô ¡©&Ô=P ˜ D[ð¿D[ š|T<8 êˆRðº ` ´ ÿ *…ATR¬ §ô ¢8 w €®0 T ǯ ¸ §ô !2@ ߃‚ ÈØ©&(¬ÈXTÌiˆØ©&s:@ >¬ÈX(¬ÈXÔ=P Æ Ç¯ Pª ÅÍ 4Þ ºî aE ºî aE ºî aE ºî aE -è 2 e ®6. C ªh2 5 5o, 0 7° @ м' / Îä Ïï( ( V % % %Ð Jmß |é k÷ , k÷ , m * h", l8) , >œ$ 0 >Ê& 6Û/ 6Û/ Q ¶ ó « h¶ ó « h¶ ó « h¶ ó « h ) Ì ^ w / š W · X^ $ · X^ $ ” ~? ” ~? ß } E” - « ' D» EÈ Ã ô U^z Ï U^z Ï U^z Ï ‰ Ñî ´v V ´v V U3 « g)9 C ñm ò}# 1 [¢ ý§ G¢ > Ÿ´ Õ¸2 ØÍ lÞ “ç þé Z ý ÕX& Z ±u ýx> ! ýx> ! J{ „. ‰ ‘Þ ! Ë# è$ k é ? ¬ Ú1, ýD èT ÿQ žu D «oK 2 »¤* u² ,µ ²Ò ÔÓ üÙ/ ? µUP U( BR BR ËXÒ ¨ZE ÷[w y\F É]W *]? r^e Õ yR 1y* dz\ Ê{$ ö{@ ?| Ø}: ~l ’€" ¼€G Ø ðƒE @ƒ' rƒM Ô Ÿ* Ÿ® Á¡. ø¢@ C¢° ý¤c i¥r å¦) §© Õ©? ©´ Õ ¾€ `Å+ ”Æ[ úÇ@ CÈb ¯Ã( ãÉ° ËE íÌ? 6Èc ¢Í¢ Ó ë² ìF ßíQ 9î^ ïG òðE Bñ= ‰ñ£ 7óE ‡ó{ ô† Ó t P. ‡- ¾y A( tJ È© È© | ¢£ Z" †Õ cH Ô 7á À: Ó:… b;¼ (=? q>ª %@c @— @— 1A. Ó ^b Ó ^b @a+ tak èb[ Md4 <e+ qf… g@ Ò „ |…# ¨…è ™ˆV ø‰€ ™‹ ´‹H ŒÜ o!| Ñ Œw RŽ+ ‡~ 1 J‘G Ï… ! ÝuG 1 [“G ¬”( èQ > ß—l ß—l â ‚È 5 Ç“= “} ( “} ( Â\ uÃT )Ç T ‡ª ~Î ~Î nƒ* ~Î ~Î ¡¹&Ô=P T ˆª ð ®Î !2@ ߃‚ Èع&À+(f°3iˆØ¹&s:@ Ö+(fÀ+(fÔ=P @ V a l u e 2 @þ$f@¯f çç @ Ð 4 xþ$f U(çç @ Ð 4 ˜½f `#fÀ f °ÿfè f * N À #fÐ"f ´ ` f ( f @ À ÿÿ ÿÿ @ èM™ çf õ$f à$fðÿ$f ˜ à$fðÿ$f [ #f ¼ –4¤Pü–` ÿ *…ATP¬Î i0 % 1) æ %© c * ˜ c * ˜ c * ˜ ( K ( K ¬% š c « K M vQ vQ T2 3 2 Òo Ö Òo Ö ¸j Ÿ jd @ ‰ < é Ç - 1 cÀ ¤Ç ç¿ N H½ . š» ̶ [ ݳ . ª L ª L ãÓ n ãÓ n eà –Ó - ×Ù ? )× \× < «Ó - ìÔ = =Î , }Ï / ¾Ê [ ?Å - ãþ þ - U÷ ·ù Ùõ > ,ï ]ð è ] è ] .ê , nä O Ðà N 0ä . Ó- 7, x= È - K . ¿ í - oþ n oþ n ñû - 2ú L Ö, . 8+; ˆ- ¨(^ ¨(^ %, \) ¿!{ ¿!{ _ . Ñ òI —P ¦L, ðC? ðC? ¡Q” ¡Q” ¡Q” ª Ôw@ &vL ëŽ> P‰ pˆ, ¯ˆJ † O ‹©, Ë©. ~ ¢ Òš+ a— “–n “–n “< e‘ Š¾N Š¾N ìºl ìºl p·= ò¸ ²| µ® å°( &§| &§| &§| ŒÖ, ÌÕO .Ð~ .Ð~ ÁÒ ñÇŽ ”ÃZ ÿ* ÿ* ×$b J { ¿ T[ Ã, ; Tl ð* æóÞ æóÞ ÙY1 T T Ún€ Ú‰a N‡ ¬» oð‡ ýóI `ô› ø" MúØ >0 }ý- Êþ5 ˆ ©s 7® ÿ$ >: Œ G é 5 1 • Û%$ ` . 7/U ¢0E û1ˆ ˜2Í mUt ùW$ 6XK ™[× ‰^L ì`K Ra¬ e# t7 Yu_ Òw# x› Á|L %~› ×8 )‚™ Ú…M •ë ™ Àˆ `¦# œ¡K þ¢N d¤5 ³¥] ¹r ”¸$ й› ƒ½8 ÔÂ3 _L Ã_ ; j A2F A2F Z@ë K ]‡t èŠ %‹_ ]¨š ¬L ra à T Æ ¸ ÞÒ ÞÒ R + ÞÒ ÞÒ ¡Ü&Ô=P T Æ …Ò ÞÒ X + ÞÒ ÞÒ ¡Ü&Ô=P T Æ ˆ …Ò ÞÒ ^ + ÞÒ ÞÒ ¡Ü&Ô=P ŽAc@ ð? À$ð? ˜ àåfðÿåf0~ö@ x©·B§ WÊ v " \T ¨ Bî` ÿ *…ATì ßÒ y1 @+ T Æ ` ßÒ !2@ ߃‚ ÈØÜ&( éf4EiˆØÜ&s:@ > éf( éfÔ=P n Æ Ë L \Ì " ‹Î w öû L Qü ] Qü ] Àþ N * £- Í- >Û‰ -ß %B € ± € ± € ± N} < ! €# " ¢'= # à –‘ ~™) ´8 ôp? @r> Šui z£; Ã¥ 覓 覓 o ñl? Ein Êk ùk/ <jˆ Økj Yl4 ¢l< ól[ cn™ ³ ® ä ªD >«8 Œ«' Ê« ú¬0 <¯C •¹ c¬^ Õ¬] E® t; î^ 8Ž Ú² TîN ¶ï ãðB :ït Âðr Hñ wð: Æñ^ X2’ þ2? P2i Ò4E ,3R ”3ž K48 š5T Zu¤ u? dti ãv} twj öw± Àx8 xT Y·… ô·? F·h Ź‡ _ºk ẓ »9 Ü»T Xùb Ïù? !úi úk üQ †üp ý9 ]üU [>ž ?? ^>i à?Q FAj Ç@ª ‰A9 ÙBT ´ îE õ5 3 w ¸ û @ –ÇT ² g tg4 ¾n[ -k ]h` Ïp( ³ š8 š< Rš7 š™! Ê™‡ lšH ž <×3 ŠØ7 õ í ú# 8 L ž ` : f ^ à: ¨]› a[8 ±ZÚ ¤\" ä[¯ ¬c# ë\r x]! ³^J õ ¢œ «Ÿ‰ MžÄ ,ž6 z M ãŸ5 3Ÿ7 ƒŸî Š¡! ƧK ö ç^ lâ: ½èM &à! cá_ Ùà: *àÈ å$ Gã# „é± Mã9 ¡â Ûä6 ô #s „#™ 7#: ˆ) ±(t >"u Ì*Š o%# %7 ý'K d#! ô fÅ ÒfM 9f7 Œcš >e9 e Ág" ÿg6 Nh_ A- ð?HZ™ > ðä÷@ (CÔ†«cЄ@ ð? À$ð?HZ™ > Pº÷@ (CN>®ŽAc@ ð? À$ð?HZ™ > p¯÷@ (CN>®ŽAc@ ð? À$ð?HZ™ > @£÷@ (CN>®ŽAc@ ð? À$ð? ˜ ¢jð¿¢j0~ö@ (C§ WÇ q@ øìŽ` ÿ *…AT°N +ç o4 - Å ® ÒC Ç Û ` ?Û : ‘Û 7 äÚ ˜ —Ü ‡ 6â % uÜ 7 Æâ K +Ü ^ £Ý r -Ý 8 |Ý : Æ š }_ˆ a n`ˆ da ˆa# Æa7 cM ~` ¸b7 a¯ Æ ¥u U£" ¶ ` ¶ ` „¦# ¾ª9 ¤7 b£ ¤N {§— .¤9 È ät Uæa Îæ" æ7 ZèL Âæ! üç8 Læ± êu £ç# æ‘ æ‘ æ‘ Ç .9 (v ¥(Ç „,$ À)$ ÿ(s ‰, @,$ }*7 Ë)Ä §*" É k7 ka ‘j‰ 2mI —kï l‰ AmK AmK ¤l" ál6 Ç ¬ð ΰM 3®" q®6 À¯` 9®" t°; ƯM 0¬… ̯u Z¬m É Southold Town Board of Appeals -51- June 17, 1982 Reg. Mtg. RESERVED DECISION: Appeal No. 2962. GERTRUDE K. REEVES. Upon application for GERTRUDE K. REEVES, by Richard F. Lark, Esq., Main Road, Cutchogue, NY for a Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31 for approval of insufficient depth of parcel located off Cedar Birch Road, Orient, NY; bounded north by Main Road; west by Brawner and Cedar Birch Road; south by Gardiner's Bay; east by Cedar Birch Road; County Tax Map Parcels No. 1000-15-8-20, 21, 23 and 26. The public hearing on this matter was held earlier this evening, at which time the hearing was declared closed after receiving testimony and decision was reserved pending deliberations. The board made the following findings and determination: By this appeal, appellant seeks approval of 150' depth of a parcel located off the west side of Cedar Birch Road. The parcel in quesion contains an area of 40,500'square feet and road frontage of 270 feet. The board agrees with appellant's reasoning, and that the relief, in the board's opinion, cannot be obviated by any method other than a variance. In considering this appeal, the board determines that the variance request is not substantial in relation to the code requirements (14%); that the circumstances are unique; that by allowing the variance no detriment to adjoining properties would be created; that no adverse effects will be produced on available governmental facilities of any increased population; that the relief requested will be in harmony with and promote the general purposes of zoning; and that the interests of justice will be served by allowing the variance as applied for. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the application for GERTRUDE K. REEVES for approval of insufficient depth of a parcel located off the west side of Cedar Birch Road, Orient, be and hereby IS APPROVED AS APPLIED FOR in Appeal No. 2962. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Douglass and Sawicki. Ÿ²bO¬UìPíéË H ]&“;$‚šB±7öåQ I Æìä6B5J‡8ùmŠVR J cWçƒÝ·Š@‡ @ÏJœxÞ K Ó„îÓ€ðDž‹¬ ²OðE L ¹å-,þN²IŠBá Ê«o M ™+zGfûYGŽ©uë\W ‹ N Ù÷MŽYýÄD§4ÿ•òÚ5 O ¶‡rÞÐ;5F”ïÑö»²z„ P *rOX òB´c59 õ a Q r¹²wPÓM´C+¸ xm R sH1_ÿÈðL”&™)¥’O S «ò:ÐûA„6¨µŠY T ã¨18üÃN‘®õoŸ*ˆ U `7ácO¸ªC“è/ƒ< V ‰ ©S)I‰™)<¼ ˆÅ W œ¿E AFœSÕL:äF; X Ô];þIë@©[ÈÌ`¬b Y ¾,#=WC›Ø9©Æ½‚ƒ Z ÂP_©Q_$J‹ß{ ²£ä [ Q}áñR1Å@‘V© C[1 \ PÑ|#©E© 6aˆ'Îv ] aüûç~J¦N)K—ƒ< ^ Á ,KI¼ï‹+ÒÒu _ :²Îàt™@’Ž7[µ Ñ ` [2êšSÊÑL™îβ×@¼ a ‰EÀ™²öJ„VÃÝo.b b Àx¡ÕÄÊvA¶¡ˆà ÆÀ c äE]„û,ÌA€Äæ ¤þ. d ’€‚“°ë OºH¢^$l e CGt¶SµfOŠ í ‹´Ù× f Ëú±àѾI”èIžÎ&ñ´ g pEöIÍlO¥6Ü ¡GÍ h «/¥¿¢Á¥K«Ç—+Žßµ i Tkœ5UD’@º øÈÁ&qø j I aÖBZîK˜úʘ1ïià k â¨¹Æ SFŸ(¼Å_µ l ÌJ˜³dO7J¾à´ ) ’€‚“°p X @ ( ø à È ° ˜ € h P 8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(ø à È ° ˜ € h P 8 ð Ø À ¨ x ` H 0 è Ð ¸ ˆ p X @ ( ø à È ° ˜ € h P 8 ð Ø À ¨ x ` H 0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ðØÀ¨x`H0 èи ˆpX@(øàÈ°˜€hP8 ð Ø À ¨ x ` ÿ (ùCVì Pù ì? !@‚ , PÝ II* þ V p æ p 8 æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 11-24-1992 1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Scuthold To;.zn Board of Appeals -53- June 17,1982 - - ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Appeal No. 2998. .ApPlica.ti~n of MARGARET DELLANNO. Variance for permission to use preexisting tourist home altered to a three-apartmen~ bUilding for use as three.-dwelling apartments in an A-District. On motion by Mr. Douglass, - . . . seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative Environmental Declaration ~ ~ conc~~n_ng the matter of ~lla___~nno__L: ." ENVIRONMENTAL DECL~ATION: ~ Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Depar%m, ent of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation La%.; and S=~=~ ~ 44- - , .... c,. 4 of the Southold To~vn Code, ncnice is hereby given that the Southold Tc%~n Board of Appeals has d=te_~m~n ~hat the subject project as prooosed in thi~ ...... ed ~r~al application is hereby classi=~e~ as a TQue II ~ ~ ~ not having a s~gnificant adverse effec~ u~on the =. ~ ~ for the fol!o~ing reason(s): - ~n~-~o~en~ .... ,~-onmen~al Assessment in the ~ -~ ' S~o=~ Forum has been s~~mz=~em which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. The property in question is not located within 300'feet of tidal wetlands.. This declaration Should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- volved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application[ Location of Property: 51255 C.R. 48 and 50 Clark Road, Southold, NY. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Douglass and Sawicki. ~ie.s sr s. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Âb(ŸxÄ9š8„8Ä9"""âdˆ‹"’&ŠC1Nã'Ôiœr†ó:‚ƒ@Sx¡ŽC"š8œ8t|hñÇ)œÂ !„&®æ8S kDtÄSñé¢C‰›¸ˆÃ#¢9‚BGœJ<âOá”S!ŽˆŽÿÿÿÿÿ X X II* þ V p æ p & æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 03/11/05 2 LaserFiche® LFImage Module -- Snowbound™ RasterMaster™ Engine ¹]1T¦¢Ÿ3{âbqŒaâGô cðð•LCÄ'>}âªñ(œãTP8…kÄ=†Fw0Fâ Çó1qÏqHPDüŸ?qLœ"b>8< B ÝŸrª)œÞx„µ"â|ÑÅ6ñvDpÄùâ‰!z¼‰kE$‚#q>Jœˆƒg☸‰O<âðhjd4Õ+çÉC#âˆÈqä¸""KbÌV>„8LgDÄH„0Î[â ñ|Ÿ8”8q¾6 GL¹ˆÎÄ'.â‚X8NáЇˆ+B¾£n?‚–1 ‚cá!ˆ¸°/ƒèâ]!‰qôé}Ìq(ÃA õˆ¡FD4C'ã çtjS!ñÂi)bžâÿÿ @ Y H Y II* þ W p æ p T æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 03/11/05 2 LaserFiche® LFImage Module -- Snowbound™ RasterMaster™ Engine '°(Q™œtA]'gâLœQîF>ŽˆB —D\˜ Q82q†ä*†"…s\‚ œÂ5‚ãxÄ) tÓÅ '>qG$®”1W4 B CÂä(qÜÎq†ƒˆ ¦p¤p¨!%#bSÞjT<±' q Æ9>Q1qtq¥%ÑE×ïDüŸÏÄ!Äñ‡8.0PîÐháD‡ÎŸüh‡á‡ òC\®‚‰£øH”«".âD<P|4˜ +"Ž@Dq2×#©‡ Œ¥~rÑE¹‰ÿ"îH^!ü„ Ñgˆ¸è 6D\8ˆêø#•sœÂ)œúS8N¹‰?"~p,ÉÌ YJ\øÃŽÂ å W ù#"þ© š¹ˆ‹ð? Áø#gh !âúi\2q÷‡( A ‰£ˆø`fÐ „“qAÌ'’$œÂ)**@-&Ù a%ÁpI„4LÜY{L1qñ‰‹¸ˆO\„Ì[#â–9Pâ".¨A`lD¢¢‘à5"&ÕtW fD JwÜÄ‹ˆˆˆùQ!’Õ¢‹Elq5]Œébh†è".ºBÐI8¬-´p2N" tDD䪈‹®*Çq1D ÓE\”+ Scuthold Town Board of Appeals -55- June.17, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Appeal No. 3005. 'Application of WILLIAM & PAULA TUITE. VarianCe for permission to construct addition to existing dwelling with reduction in sideyard. On motion by Mr. Douglass, ' seconded ~y Mr. Sawlcki, it was RESOLVED to declare the fo~c.._.~g Negative Environmental Declaration concerning the matter of ~illiam & Pau. la ?uite: ENVIRONMENTAL DECL~ATION: Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act Artic]= 8 of the Environmental Co ..... va._on La%.~ and Section ~-4 of the Sou~.~o=d To~vn Code, no%zce is hereby given that the Scuthold Town Board of Apmeals ~s determined ~ ~ _ "~ ~..a~ the subject project as uro~osed in this -- - ~P~-ca=~©n is hereby classified as a -~' havinc a S!C~Ii~ adverse errecu Uuon =ne enviroD_~en~ ~n_ foi!o~vi~g reason(s) : This declaration Should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- volved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Location of Property: S/s Midway Road, Cedar Beach Park Lot 113, Southold, NY. Vo~ of the Board: Ayes: Me. ssrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, DouglaSs, and Sawicki. Scuthold Town Board of Appeals =56- June 17,1982 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: of PAUL & BARBARA LEARY. Appeal No. 3004..Applicatio~n Permission to construct deck addition with insufficient sideYard setback (and rebuild existing steps). On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawiuki,' it was RESOLVED, to ~ centare the fcllc~.zing Negative Environmental Declaration concerning the matter of Paul & Barber.a Leery: · - Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Depar~T~ent of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation La%.; and Section 44-~ of the Southo!d To~vn Code, · ~ .... e is hereby given that the Southcld Town Board of Appeals has dete-~m~ined that the subject project as proposed in this ~-~ application is hereby classified as a Tvoe not havinc a s~cm~ =~=~= adverse effec~ uuon t~ enviro~ent for the following reason(s): - An Environmental Assessment in the · Snot= Forum has been suzmitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this projec~ be imp!~mented as planned. This declaration should not be considered a detel~ination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- vo!ved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. - Location of Property: 165 Second Street, New Suffolk NY; 1000-117-10-20.5. ' . , Vote of the Board: Ayes: Dougla§s and Sawicki. 5Ie. ssr s. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Scuthold Town Board of Appeals -57- June 17., 1982' __~VIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Appeal No. 3003. ·Applida-ti~n of ~ORGE & BEVERLY BOEHLE. Variance for permission. re-sqparate two parcels, each with insufficient area and. depth. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Sawicki, it was R~SO~¥_~, tc declare the fo!!c~ing Negative Environmental Declaration concerning the m'atter of George & Beverly Boehle: _ . Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Deuar~ent of znvzronmenta] Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation La%.;, and Section 44-4 of the Scutho!d Token Code, nonice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals nas deue-~mined that the subject project as proposed in this appeal aPPlication is ' -~ - ne_~ classified as a ~v~e .... having a s!gnlficant adverse effect uuon tA~ enviroD~len5 for the fol!o%ving reason(s): - An Environmental Assessment in the S~o=~ Forum.. has b .... su-m~ac which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be implemented as planned. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- volved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. - Location of Propertv: Westview, Mayflower ·and Woodcliff Drives, Mattituck, NY. ' · Vote of the Board: Ayes: Douglass, and Sawicki. }~essr s. Goerhinger, Grigonis, Doyen, ¬Ó˜ «˜ ! «˜ ! «˜ ! ¨Y† ¨Y† ¨Y† ¨›… ! ¨›… ! ¨›… ! t £Š £Š £Š £Š £Š Xt £U‰ £U‰ £U‰ £U‰ £U‰ š: fšý fšý fšý k& ¦b P P †7 Ô L 8 ü ñ H9 CL: ‘F) ‘F) ÐON 4KM —Nˆ 5T& rN² 9O' uU ñ iî õl† µ‹ ÷“& —“; ñ Ì# +ÒJ ͉ /Ïç è ¨êà œìG ííd ZöX »ð/ óõy vù7 ¹î Ýò@ &óQ û \ y ˜e t ! „ ©{ /G e íË Â. ú y }!6 ¿ 6? [8R ·@ á9\ G9 g9t ä< @{ Ž>8 Ï@h @@M ™A& ËI åA* I! CHp ¼K dq Œ`G Ýa” |cm òde ! `gJ ³g? úh/ 3h SpA žhs ! oy žl) Óu ˆ* Gˆ* y‰P ÓŠk F k‹L Á”! ê“p d— ˆ•p ‘H S‘” ò“8 8”% jœ ‚• ¶« ĺ" î¸q h¼ Žºp ¶G X·” ÷º7 ;º& n ‡»* ½¼J ¼> WÄ! ½K ×\ uØJ ÈÝK 0 ÍQ@ X xÛÍQ ÍQà X €‘ X 8 ( ’ X ¿• @ À’ X ·Z`“ X @ 8 @Œ X ( @ àŒ X ˜ ÀÍQðßÍQ € X ”2„"Îz&Ò` ´ ÿ *…AT€|Ûý ã: ° 5ÆM V žé Scutho!d Town Board of Appeals -59- June 17, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Appeal No, 2805. Applica~io9 of VINCENT W. ANNABEL. Variance for approval of .insufficient road frontage for one parcel. On motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded ~y Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to declare the fol!cwing Negative Environmental Declaration concerning the matter of Vincent ~W. Annabel: EIiVIRON~.[ENTAL DECLD3~.T!O~[: ~' Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southo!d Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has determined that the subject project as prooosed in this .~_al application is hereby classified as a Tvoe II Action, not having a sicnif~cant adverse effect u~on the environment for the following reason(s): An Environmental Assessment in the Short Foz~ has be~ ~ z ~whlch lndm~cates that no significant adverse effects ~ -y to occu~ should this project be implemented as planned. This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- volved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Location of Property: Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, NY. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Dougla~ss, and Sawicki. * Me. ssr s. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Southo!d Town Board of Appeals -60- -June 17, 1982 ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION: Appeal No. 2987'. ApplicatiOn of NORTH FORK BANK & TRUST CO. Variance for permission to . construct drive-in banking facility with canopy extending. into-the frontyard area. On motion by Mr. Douglass, . · . seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to declare the following Negative Environmenta Declaration concerning the matter of North Fork Bank & Trust.~o, Ei~VIRON~-~ENTAL DECL~ATIO~: ~ Pursuant to Section 617.13 of the N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation Act, Article 8 of the'Environmental Conservation Law, and Section 44-4 of the Southold Town Code, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Board of Appeals has dete-~mined that the subject project as proposed in this appeal application is hereby classified as a ~zoe II Action, not having a significant adverse effect u~on the environment for the following reason(s): ' An Environmental Assessment in the Short Forum has been submitted which indicates that no significant adverse effects were likely to occur should this project be imolemented as planned. . This declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also be in- volved, nor for any other project not covered by the subject appeal application. Location of Property: Mattituck Shopping Center~ Vote of the Board: Ayes: Dougla~ss and Sawicki. M~srs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, >D\‘ i¼ž¸è%1qÅ‚ˆËh áNvI9'â… â!bD †0!ÇAÄaÊÛŠ %΢+A@ˆD%%î´ƒˆ ÿ§–ˆO\lñ•<â(q& qq">ñ@88‡‡D ‡Š§TŒ"âÓ)œG¸¬ˆˆˆøä<•)œãd'Æ9ÎpNf$ãP§p¢0¾‰/D˜¸ˆG C&ÎÄÅ âHDDtžÐ ÁtirÓ‰¸‰OÏà$ 5å4~A a…D5TˆÖ8þ!hG!(l §pñÑ ;¢!¤p —–„"îÄ8'ã ç ÁXÖÉ' ñ‰‹ qÑ'Îħ›xKtèaP¡erTˆÌC4ŽCAag©‰3ñ‰G\ÐP^·[B ‡ ¤pCŠ„ˆÂˆ˜BP19*’«"âäÑ#!Ž‰GÜÄ!Ä#Žg⊈ˆ†Íé¢câLœ‰G<™aâÑ1ñˆ3ñc*ƒ ÓUˆˆˆˆÉAaâ!†ˆ€ ""Nnâ"Žé1 1âd ŠøÿÿÿOVýÿ ¹ ˜ ¹ II* þ V p æ p ¤ æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 2003:07:25 10:06:42 Kofax standard Multi1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED d ìÜtM Q¢[~fò⸈ QÄ5Gl1"~†ƒ 1ÁB´$ˆ‚‡Kdâq8 2q ‚Æ#Žˆˆ¸XM|ú³˜øã1B„ÄÛ´è2 ?ñ!Ná JÂsçtD ".ÂD<â#ØÎqH’G«mÖ¸‡aD Ÿ@Ÿ8ÇÉ8?Aà ׈O ͂颇#â? =âˆ8ùÄE\Ä'.â<Ž¥5 rxD|–ÙL ç2qñˆOüŸ<âÓ#ÞˆˆÏ2ÝôÙbˆ3qgâG‰câ Ž ÑœÞ1 ‚‚ÂA „ž8T".â4 BDDDD #ò4”¸ˆÇ âG‰‹xÄY`â"Ž!˜ª „M\ ¤p„S8t4ñ‰GœEÿ]ˆ›ÂiÜ!œã q$DDÄ'–xâÏ‹-â÷„'>q¦CDÂO°Þƒ¨""""::ž\ ŽgWñE¿À ÑWùÁ’P Y¡ä"NHgs C` ".†’ƒ® 'Çñÿÿ?Yõÿ' ¹ N ¹ II* þ V p æ p Z æ î ( 2 ö ; È È È 2003:07:25 10:06:42 Kofax standard Multi1996 SNOWBOUND, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED dž‰¯ˆSª $Ç!â".º¢‹¸–ÿ‚–$ú[oü¯#.N|÷câùOñ !âc]SJtÈ É8ŒOl1">ñ‰ã Ö%ŽB, q¢Fã#ü ŽsA&ÎGÄð'„>ñå”RÄÿY0ñFœÅÄEœFä<yÄEœŒ˜êJ7Lá"^¢4â,b‹=½áèpD|‡‰ƒxÄÁx2™¢Câ8…M ,!$ᄯ>…óæN ¥äc‡€ˆà4N‰âD`D$""&':™xÄQâ7qñ‰Sd"G !""&G‰ƒqq7ñÃE"lœ„Á ŽS83Ñ‚%â"!>ñˆ3qGˆqC`⎈GDDŽÊ%n☸ˆ#ĉ87´#"""‚AY ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ Él@ T D N A M E n v a r c h a r ˜ 8(Dm çç Ð 4 `:Dm n v a r c h a r 8:Dmïï €4 çç þ Ð 4 ø:Dm ÿ ¸:DmP:Dm@ T D N A M E Dmø:Dm è:Dm @ T D N A M E Ð 4çç þ Ð 4 PFBmþ p:DmÈ=Dm€<Dm Î è p:Dm 0 ´ ` Dm ( à;Dm è ÿÿ ÿÿ ÀlP>Dm ´?Dn Dm °;Dm8;Dm8•«k h h p;Dm ÐËàZ¶ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ @ C o m m a n d n v a r c h a r çç Ð 4 =Dm n v a r c h a r Ø<Dm €4 çç @ Ð 4 ˜=Dm X=Dm @ C o m m a n d ˜=Dm È:Dm ˆ=Dm @ C o m m a n d çç @ Ð 4 øEBm@ =Dm ÀCm ?Dm P è =Dm ´ ` Dm ( €>Dm è ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿ 1 1 1 0 €? €? €? ðÃàZðÃàZ0À#Xì>Dmää˜ àä˜ ?Dm@>Dm˜ÇàZ è,@m ?Dm”<((ýÒ§|QYÚ&ˆÐ ¥ z O † $ ÿ³4ù Î £ ©[x M " ÷ Ì ¡ v K Sõ Ê Ÿ t I ó È . r G ,ñ_Æ›pEïÄ„nC¯Â—µlAëÀ•j?Ü0é¾U“h=çW¼*‘±fŠ~;«å]ã¸27 á ¶ ‹ ` Œ˜ ¸a p *…ATð 2Çö “@ ß5 "/) 0 D3ù J¬IEúXF +€ Eð %] 0 MÝî.=›³KŠ\Eú¸²XÆ +€ ìÑ R 0 èJ8/P²ÂO§EüµVûª +€ É "s 0 Î &>ë3GñEþ6tún +€ «U °w 0 Ó A)© K‰ÓF”Ød +€ §ë NØ 0 ·†lÄ?²H™FÝɇ +€ W® ± 0 <ÎSì Ú²L–»F$Ï_ +€ ì ui 0 "wGHíÆÛC¡ÂF]„ò@ +€ •4 1¢ 0 §( ¹¾ÿm@šÃFh.xì +€ óÝ ¤Ö 0 ë-ïBLä~C•‘Fª<íé +€ ê± üô 0 TºðÓ{oàI¨kF‹³y +€ c^ ¥ 0 ¤›¼ähf¾@’ºFï×ÌN +€ p' Å— 0 ‰´Õö.zKªRFr¸¶» +€ )Ý sÖ 0 å_ûÉn6 CžRFÖLqò +€ Ùl Bˆ 0 $˜K®— Southold Town Board of Appeals -63- June 17, 1982 Regular Mtg. board at this time, the Chairman declared the meeting closed. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 11:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals RECEIVED AND FILED BY ~ sou~o,.D TOW, C~.~,~ DAT~//~ HOUB)/'3~.~,