Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5453
APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman Gerard P. Goehringer Lydia A. Tortora Vincent Orlando James Dinizio, Jr. Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Tel. (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF APRIL 8, 2004 Ref. # 5453 - JOSEPH TRENCHENY Property Location: 120 South Lane, East Marion CTM #37-6-3.2. RECEIVED ~-~ //.'.5-O .~,4// -APR 1 Southold Town Clerk SEQRA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without an adverse effect on the environment if the project is implemented as planned. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The applicant's 13,056 sq. ft. parcel has 60 ft. along the south side of Oak Street in East Marion and 325.17 feet in depth along the easterly property line. The property is only 35.38 ft. at the southerly end of the property, along Orient Harbor. The existing one- story dwelling is 33.1 feet from the front property line, 3.4 feet from the east side property line, and approximately 34 feet from the west side property line, as shown on the February 26, 2003 survey prepared by Peconic Surveyors, P.C. BASIS OF APPLICATION: The Building Department's Notice of Disapproval dated August 25, 2003, amended 2-23-04, cites Code Section 100-244B in its denial of a building permit application concerning additions and alterations, for the reason that the total side yards are proposed at less than 25 feet (combined). FINDINGS OF FACT The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on February 26, 2004 and March 18, 2004, at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony, documentation, personal inspection of the property, and other evidence, the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant: AREA VARIANCE RELIEF REQUESTED: Applicant proposes a two-story addition along the west side of the existing dwelling. The applicant's February 26, 2003 site plan, revised 8/18/03, prepared by Architechnogies, shows a new two-story addition at 10 feet from the closest angle along the southwest lot line, and 15 feet from the side property line at the greatest width, without change to the easterly 3.4 ft. side yard, resulting in a combined side yard area of 13.4 feet. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:AMENDED RELIEF: During the January 22, 2004 public hearing, the applicant indicated that a second story was also being added over a portion of the existing dwelling, which would not meet the side yard setback requirements. At the February 26, 2004 public hearing, the Board reviewed the applicant's February 23, 2004 amended site plan adding a proposed · Page ? :- April 8, 2004 ZBA No. 5453 - Joseph Trencheny CTM 1000-37-6-3.2 second-story over the existing first floor of the dwelling at 7'6" from the easterly side lot line. In this review, the applicant was requested to consider an alternative which would increase the side yard at the sharp angle of the south/west lot line, for the reason that the 10 ft. setback as angled would not provide sufficient fire accessibility. On March 16, 2004, the applicant submitted a revised site plan, providing an increased setback from 10 ft. to 12 ft. on the south/west angle from the proposed addition at its closest point. REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: On the basis of testimony presented, materials submitted and personal inspections, the Board makes the following findings: 1. Grant of the alternative relief will not produce an undesirable change in character of neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant's house is one of many single-story houses along South Lane in East Marion. The new proposed construction will transform the existing house into a two-story design with a height at 26 feet to the ridge. The existing side yard set back of 3'4" on the north/east side of the property will be unchanged. The new second story addition will have an increased easterly side yard setback from the 3'4" that remains for the existing first floor to 7'6", and the west/southwest side setbacks will be 17'6" and 12', as shown on the survey/site map revised March 16, 2004, prepared by Architechnologies. 2. The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method, feasible for applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. This lot is particularly long and narrow, which leaves the side yards with little or no room for expansion. The logical choice is for an expansion as designed with the new construction as second-story additions. 3. The variance requested is substantial for a two-story addition, representing a 38% reduction for the existing 3.4' side yard and proposed 12 ft. side yard, from the current code requirement of 25 feet for combined total side yard setbacks. The additional second-story will result in a reduction of 22%, for a combined side yard area of 19'6" (7'6" and 12' minimum) as revised. 4. The difficulty was self-created because the applicant acquired the nonconforming premises with knowledge of the tight side yards, and while zoning restrictions were, and have been, in effect. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B, motion was offered by Member Orlando, seconded by Member Tortora, and duly carried, to DENY the relief as applied for, and to GRANT alternative relief as shown on the March 16, 2003 amended plan prepared by Page 3 - April 8, 2004 ZBA NO. 5453 - Joseph Trencheny CTM 1000-37-6-3.2 Architechnologies. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Olive (Chairwoman), Goehringer, Tortora, Orlando, and Dinizio. This Resolution was duly adopted (5-~k~ J~ ' ~('~-~,~_. Ruth D. Olive, Chairwoman 4//,~,/04 Approved for Filing LEGAL NOTICE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS THURSDAY, JANUARY 22, 2004 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 267 of the Town Law and Chapter 100 (Zoning), Code of the Town of Southold, the following public hearing will be held by the SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS at the Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box 1179, Southold, New York 11971-0959, on Thursday, January 22, 2004, at the time noted below (or as soon thereafter as possible): 10:10 AM. JOSEPH TRENCHENY #5453. Request for a Variance under Section 100-244B, based on the Building Department's August 25, 2003 Notice of Disapproval, concerning additions and alterations proposed with a total side yard area at less than 25 feet, at 120 South Lane, East Marion; Parcel 37-6-3.2. The Board of Appeals will hear all persons, or their representatives, desiring to be heard at each hearing, and/or desiring to submit written statements before the conclusion of each hearing. Each hearing will not start earlier than designated above. Files are available for review during regular business hours. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to call (631) 765-1809. Dated: December 23, 2003. RUTH D. OLIVA, CHAIRWOMAN BOARD OF APPEALS FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 25, 2003 AMENDED: February 23, 2004 TO: Architecnologies A/C Trencheny 13405 Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated June 16, 2003 For additions and alterations to an existing single family dxvelling at Location of property 120 South Lane, East Marion, NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 37 Block6 Lot 3.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed addition/alteration to a non-conforming single family dxvelling, on a non-confomfin~ 13,056 square foot parcel in the R-40 District, is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIV Section 100- 244, which states, That non-conforming lots, measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size, require a minimum total side yard setback of 25 feet. Following the new construction, the dwelling will have a total side yard setback of 21 feet. Total lot coverage will be less than 20 percent. This Nn_~tie£ of Disapproval ,vas amended on February 23~ 2004 to correct errors. CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: An)' change or deviation to the above referenced application ma), require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. For Office Use Only Fee:$ Filed By:. Date Assigned/Assignment No. Office Notas: ~rO ParcelLocation: HouseNo. 109f0 Street[~X32q'~ ~-~to~ Hamlet SCTM 1000 Section__~_Block ~ Lot(s) ~. ~ Lot SizeA~Zone District Q I (WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED: ~ - c~ ~ ' O ~ Applicant/Owner(s): Address: Telephone: Author~ed Representative: Address: Please specify who you wish correspondence tb be mailed to, from the above listed nam.es: [3 Applicant/Owner(s) Jg~Authorized Representative [3 Other: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED ~-~--- FOR: ~/~Buiidtng Permit. Certificate of Oceupaney [] Pre-Certificate of Occupancy [3 Change of Use [] Permit for As-Built Construction Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. Indicate Article, Section, Subsection and paragraph of Zoning Ordinance by numbers. Do not quote the code. Article Section 100- Subsection Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: /~A Variance to the Zonta~ Code or Zoning Map. A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. [3 Interpretation of lite Town Code, Article Section [] Reversal or Other A prior appeal [] has [] has not been made with respect to this property UNDER Appeal No. Year Page 2 of 3 - Appeal Application Part A: AREA VARIANCE REASONS (affach extra sheet as needed): (1) An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a _ dehlment to nearby prope~ies, if granted, because: ,-'~e ~oca ~_o ~ ~o~ I~bG ~L<~CL~ ~ C~ (2) The benefit sought by lhe applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible For the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance, because: I-~; ~-I ~ ~/~G ~ ~ [~ ? A- ~ (3) The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: T~E E ~ ~ ~'~ aG- ~4 aa %~ (4) The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or Impact on the physiccd or environmentdi conditions In the neighborhood or district because: ~-~ ~ iA R~,G~T ~,~- ,~- ~-~q -14oo~' (5) Has the variance been self-created? ( ) Yes, or (><~) No. If not, is the construction existing, as built?. ('~/) Yes, or ( ) No. (6) Additional InFormation about the surrounding topography and building areas that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirements: ~affach extra sheet as needed) This is the MINIMUM that Is necessary and adequate, and at the same time preserves and protects the character of the neighborhood and the health, safely, and welfare of the community. ( ) Check this box and complete PART B, Questions on next page to apply~ ~ (Please consult your attorney.) Otherwise, please proceed to the sianature and Sworn to before me this I'~ , TNo~w PU~DA M. BOHN NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New York NO. 01 B06020932 Qualified in Suffo(k County Term Expires Ma,nh 8. ~q D~ SIg~nature of Appellant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit Autho~ation from Owner) / / COUNTY OF SUFFOLK iE~iii~ Reo~ Pro. ped-~ Tax Service ~g~~OOTHOLO ~c~ )WG, NO.: FILE NAME: OWG. NAME: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN 8.19.03 ISSUED TO BLDG. DEPT. FOR REVIEW. A.SITE TR_SITE_EX 2.19.o4 BE-'SSUEDTOBLDG..""T. FOBBEV,-- PROPOSED TF SCALE: 2.23.04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEVV. EAST MARION 8.8.03 ~,,= 2o,¢, ~R?,~UEDTOT. E Z.S.^.FORR~V,~V. SITE S U R V ",Z ¥ SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT EAST MARION TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N.Y. 1000 - 37-06' - 3.2 SCALE: 1" -- 30' FEB. 26, 2003 NOTE: LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TC, MAP OF SECTION 2 OF GARDiNER'S BA'Y ESTATES FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNT? CLERK'S OFFICE ON SEPT. 2.3, 1927 AS MAP NO. 275. AREA = 1.3,056 SQ. FT. TO TIE FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM ,36103C0177 G 5/4/98 IINFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY MR.JOHN T. METZGER LAND SURVEYOR DATED FEB. 26, 2005. OCT. 2.5. 2002 (TOPO. & B.O.H.) LINE "gez°°ze 'e ! I I f I T E C N O L O G I ~ ICHENY ALTERATION .... [ ~ARC'I41'rldCTURE PLANNING CONSTI~UCTION SEI ~1 I~A/ %f(-*l [:~ I~ ~ , ~ ~n~ .,~;. l:.,.~a ~..;m~l* New York [ 1952 L, . .�} APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS p�0�uFFot�COG Southold Town Hall Ruth D. Oliva, Chairwoman = y1 53095 Main Road Gerard P. Goehringer y Z P.O. Box 1179 Lydia A. Tortora $ • Southold,NY 11971-0959 Vincent Orlando ?� p� Tel. (631) 765-1809 James Dinizio,Jr. ��l �►a Fax(631) 765-9064 http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 16, 2004 Arch itechnologies, Inc. Attn: Aggie 13405 Main Road ' Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Appl. No. 5453 —J. Trencheny Variance Dear Aggie: Supplementing our fax copy transmitted the other day, please find enclosed a copy of the determination rendered by the Board of Appeals at its meeting of April 8, 2004. Please be sure to contact the Building Department (765-1802) regarding the next step in the building and zoning review process. You may want to furnish an extra copy of the enclosed determination with any other documents that may be requested by the Building Department for final reviews. Thank you. Very truly yours, Linda Kowalski Enclosure Copy of Decision 4/12/04 to: Building Department OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Email: Linda.Kowalski(i Town.Southold.ny.us http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631) 765-1809 fax(631) 765-9064 a q 1 COVER SHEET FOR TRANSMITTAL ATTN: �< i�d� ,DATE: / /2004 SUBJECT: MESSAGE: Please find attached copies for your information. a Ple se call us at 765-1809 if you did not receive all sheets. Thank you. Pages affached: 2 . J� ITECNOLOGIES ARCMECT M PLANNING CONSMUMON SMICBS ` .13405 Mau Road,Mauituck,New Yank 11952 631.298.1129 fax:631.298.1128 March 16, 2004 Southold Town Board of Appeals RECEIVED Southold, N.Y. MAR 1 6 2004 RE: Joseph Trencheny ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 120 South Lane East Marion, N.Y. S.C.T.M.# 1000-37-6-3.2 Enclosed please find the following documents for your review: 1. Revised Site Survey to allow 12' property setback on the South/West point of the proposed residence. ( Ref: to site survey dated 3.16.04) Thankyou.for,„your time and consideration. W w ©a® TCt ;; \'• , rte.-�`,...�,.-.-�..��� ,- ` yt, ., - ` em.S�' - "-t., � _ - t}x, `e � _ � _ t _ 1 , = ARCFIITE6UTRE; PLANNING ,CONSTRUCTION SERVICES` , .13405 blain Road,=IVia tu.i;N.w'i&k 11952 631.298.1129 fax:631.298:1128' ht, Februa' ,23;'2004''+;. =�Y IE ;.So•utfiold Town Board of Appeals ( SOUthOld;,'N.Y;.' _ `RE: -JoseG'h Trend iien' 120`South`iLane`" ,,. .East,Marion' N':Y:.=: 1. v1�, °= Enclosed,please:fi'nd`''tfie following documents'for;'y`our'r-evi'ew: 7: IQ `1 :Recent'Soothold;Town'Buildingy Dapartrrierit lett&'-6f'disapproval:`da ed _ February 23 ,,20014" - }_ ' -'2: ;Seven sets of re`vised_drawings4s p_er;bur=precious request made,:on January 22 2004. :R ,3: "Copiesbf'existin`g ',Sitb,SbNe; 4. 'Co of'the"res orise,letterf'sent to Mr'Frank,S:_Tfior -T � �it r�ro roti` e arid'consideration.^ " ?t ' `` eC = k, [,lCaan�,•w i ��p emlt _ �1', i{ - _ t+'�- r , 'F• n ''1 'A OA�{•�,'`F e - - , , u _ 1, "-�S' 6� P,q, F 0000 '7 °Fr 'I�' 'r `i - a t A ch tecta °:, '•1 'n �C7�,�gfo.yaa04AQA'b. - ;,,�f' _ 'i, - 'i' ''• v, mit lk- !. , I- 'li ..}, a. , :JK .'t, ``,\.1 i)`iYJ:_) _ "IYIr„ 'its _.Ji, "y a.l�':. _ 11 _ 'Y ,!'`` .1 _ ,`�: rl. _'M.° _ '') i,. tial 1C" �iY+`' (,- - - 1' - ,`.,4�" - .v' .S�•} X19. J�" "�I=. I ,•y;"- ''tr ?' - 11 I 11 _ `fL,. r\., �,4', , ?1� ,,,.y' p'' i,,, �� ,.j�`� ,J ,p•_ - y t: ,�J�t�,}' J?' ,,t ``�` „4Y' _•)"' '+, •`P•`,`,yam_,' �;4 `{' _;}.'• _- - - _ i i .. - - - - - _ ,"-. " �'r ,!, - _ `Via,, �(y .!. J s. h Trenche n '`f, `J•' „: j. o I' . f,r F FZ' `d-` i; r7, ®nda. oa 8 I 1, ,f. "I„I. Pkv,_ .l - _ - - _ �', _ _ _ `7 . ockville, e t e 'a,:f at i V• - �.1 ; at ” tp�0,i-n,e.1'1'�""" ea i Ca- �, �l.�l ! ,)r. - 1 - Viµ" " ' t' '.,k%:'/` 4 T '',,''; :T 1. ,�. Y , I- - - +i , _ - _ _ _ J.-1 = _ rt. _ - + ;`r -fit•. }j - r_ - - 1, J 1, ) 'L.r7' t •Yt iK,d -`t.,n xl,. .,,5 i t-" - - _ - .A a, ,,, ti„ / • _ , .5: " ` Ja'nu�a' �26���2004' � "4� - �, - _ ',,'4-._- y.-,- - - 1 J o� G 'L`` , f- -cf� <,.;, ,1;%'t„ +il.i''/"' `:1 ;P, _ - ,�)_; )ham, }� '„4' W/.' - _!j. 3:. ;- A; '.t s '^4 ` . ", ;t, „.,_ ! ;� -r ;le i' r F1'-..'.�_-,i ;M ,`, ,�,,,. , ` p. �_ i -ri; _ T _ _ - _ d _ ,J• =i ,d ~.f s laVi M11 �0 -J f P.:O'.:Bo�c:5` �� �P 1 . -t',.' ` v+T''' `,a 11 �•,•°a .;. PTS ",}. t.:"T = .,E, r' :N' -1,�� 9 t`�: aste-Ma ion' Y. 1 39: , ',J.. ,,,,`� ,aiY', •'t I 4' r7,'.. '1 f - ,, ,�;' }� _1, -/�`.r :/ ,,- 1 . 51 -'y'' - �„ '">' :r^ -;/�" `/`'! -f'- - moi, - r ,l,r J 'A' _ il , ;,_' .; :r' a,, 1�7, ''�' _ tet,; 11" Dea'rfFran`k:. 19 ILV Q MEW OAK COURT Lu LU cy�N LuLL- 7- N.58°58'30'E. 60 30.00' 74.72' Z - ��Y ' , vA,Occic/N W o� �•� � �C FD c(i cl OP Q` w :b w, a� • r �' 3.4' 03 p � --• � � fir, a W - h3c• a O • 0.9' 0.9' Gi y So O Y °! BRICK B CONC, •baso /30. SURVEY OF PROPERTY AT EAST MARION o LOT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 0 SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 — 37. — 06 — 3.2 SCALE' 1" = 30' PCO FEB. 26, 2003 LOT ' ® 4.5' LOT 0 NEO 541 Za N� x ��N E �N E bow) os'N' loY o� 0 a.2 1.61 WOOD 0 CoNc-WAL-R� STEPS' r — WOOD sTEPs °' •8' AE (el 9) N'� FRAME ( •Zou E cin cn � ® v WOODEN JETTY 0 NOTE, LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO "MAP OF SECTION Z OF GARDINER'S BAY ESTATES " FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON SEPT. 23, 1927 ye jL o AS MAP NO. 275 w j o36'3� 3p 5.38 R s. 3 NA-gO AREA = 13,056 sq ft. to tie line FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM 36103CO177 G 5/4/98 ANY ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO TH/S•SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK S TA TE'EDUCA TION LAW. EXCEPT AS PER SECTION 7209 - SUBDIVISION 2. ALL CERTIFICATIONS HEREON ARE VALID FOR THIS MAP AND COPIES THEREOF ONLY IF SAID MAP OR COPIES BEAR THE IMPRESSED SEAL OF THE,,SURVEYOR N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 WHOSE SIGNATURE APPEARS HEREON. ADDITIONALLY TO COhpLY WITH SA 10 LAW TERM 'ALTERgD BY " ECONIC U YOBS, P.C. MUST BE USED BY ANY AND ALL SURVEYORS UTILIZWG © (631) 765 - 5020 FAX (631) 765 - 1797 OF ANOTHER SURVEYOR'S MAP. TERMS SUCH -INSPECTED 'AND P. 0. BOX 909 BROUGHT - TO - DATE 'ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITti THE LAW. 1230 TRAVELER STREET SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 / 03 - 133 r r � , FORM NO. 3 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 25, 2003 1 TO: Architecnologies A/C Trencheny a 3 0 13405 Main Road Mattituck,NY 11952 Please take notice that your application dated July 16, 2003 OCT 2 9 2003 For permit to construct an additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at t� Location of property 120 South Lane,East Marion,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 37 Block 6 Lot 3_2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction, on this non-conforming 13,056 square foot lot in the Residential R-40 District is not pennitted pursuant to Article IIISection 100-244B which states that lots measurin less than 20,000 square feet in total size require total side and setback of 25 feet. The existing single family dwelling has a total side yard setback of 22eet. Following the proposed addition, the building will have a total side yard setback of+/-13 feet. Total lot coverage will b ss than 2 ercent. Autho ' ed gnature CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. r ��°�®% �c°may ELIZABETH A.NEVILLE Town Hall, 53095 Main Road TOWN CLERK y P.O.Box 1179 REGISTRAR,OF VITAL STATISTICS %ftoy • �� Southold, New York 11971 MARRIAGE OFFICER Fax(631) 765-6145 RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER O,( ��° Telephone(631) 765-1800 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER southoldtown.northfork.net OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Elizabeth A. Neville, Southold Town Clerk DATED: October 30, 2003 RE: Zoning Appeal No. 5453 Transmitted herewith is Zoning Appeal No. 5453 of Joseph Trencheny by Agnieszka Drozokoroska/Architecnologies for a variance. Also included is: ZBA Questionnaire; Project Description; Applicant Transactional Disclosure Form; Short Environmental Assessment Form; Notice of Disapproval dated August 25, 2003 with building application attached;photographs (4); plans; and survey. OCT 2 9 2003 u PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Please include with Z.B.A.Application) Applicant(s): (-_Ig `l'p� _ao I. If building is existing and alterations/additions/renovations are proposed A. Please give the dimensions and ov6rall square footage of extensions beyond existing building: Dimensions/size: l 2' >( - l o" Square footage:_ ? $a?„ SPT. B. Please give the dimensions and square footage of new proposed foundation areas which do not extend beyond the existing building: Dimensions/size: Square footage: 11. If land is vacant: Please give dimensions and overall square footage of new construction: Dimension/size: Square footage: Height: III. Purpose and use of new construction requested in this application: S M3 - t-L Lel -QW r N[-n IV. Additional information about the surrounding contours or nearby buildings that relate to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): '�� X \5T\IVC-� ►��i-Cnn�� as 1 '(-i V. Please submit seven( )photos/sets after staking corners of the proposed new construction. 7/02 Please note:Further changes, after submitting the above information, must be placed in writing and may require a new Notice ofDisapproval to show changes to the initial plans. If additional time is needed, please contact our office, or please check with Building Department(765-1802) or Appeals Department (765--1809)ifyou are notsure. Thankyou. l I � QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FILING WITH YOUR Z.B.A.APPLICATION A. Is the subject premises listed on the real estate market for sale? ❑Yes ONo B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? ❑Yes "o C. 1)Are there any areas that contain wetland grasses?ti 6G- 2)Are the wetland areas shown on the map submitted with this application? �S 3)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? 1-ioS . - 4)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the office of the Town Trustees for its determination of jurisdiction? D- Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? 00 (If not applicable, state"n/a".) E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist and are not shown on the survey map that you are submitting? 00 (If none exist, please state «none".) F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? o cD If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and map as approved by the Building Department. If none,please state. G- Do you or any co-owner also own other land close to this parcel? kp O If yes,please explain where or submit copies of deeds. H. Please list present use or operations conducted at this parcel to VO& LE F-A-P 1 L-'`1 -05 RE2,\D�-0CJE;- and proposed use 51►-jGLE i—,A—M i L:,4 4, Rc-,S1 iX-�C _ AdAhorized Signature and Date 4 ®L T 2 9 2003 J d7 :A ' APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide informatiom which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. YOUR NAME: #&p/Eszk,4 Jpc'J20ow5e4- (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity, such as a company. If so,indicate the other person or company name.) NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance _ Variance Change of Zone 0 C T 2 9 2003 Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map -=-= - -' --— Other , If"Other name the activity: Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling, parent, or child) have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold? "Relationship" includes by blood, marriage, or business interest. `Business interest" means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of (or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself(the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D (below) and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse, sibling, parent, or child is (check all that apply): A)the-owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this cN day of Signature: &AL& Print Name: l9GQ/eB J-,1- PROJECrl.D.NUMBER - w--- SEQ-R 617.21 Append C OCT 2 2003 State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONAMNTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-Project Information(To be complete by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1.Applicant/Sponsor 2.Project Name I 0l8Sz4-1 l R.D2z&7SK-'� . 3.Project location: Municipality County !Sc �8. "+e-40&D. oop p-otx- 4.Precise location(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,eta or provide map) 5.Is proposed action: ( )NEW ( EXPANSION (�J MODIFICATION 1 ALTERATION 6.Describe project briefly: RE(�Ol�l�-c-to1J li-L' QAJ-fpl E/1c1F5Q-1 Il`�C� I��l It-I011'� O� �l�i✓(.� 2 T 7.Amount of land affected: Initlaliy. acres; Ultimately: acres t3.Will proposed action comply with existing or other exisdng land use restrictions:( }YES (M NO If No,describe briefly: �Rl✓-EArI�`T-I,�C� 1�9C�F�-�OtV�©2-�`--L1�C� , 9.What Is present land use in vicinity of project(describe): Residential ( )Industrial ( )Commercial ( )Agricultural ( )Park/Forest/Open Space ( )Other t I.oC-st'e 10.Does action Involve a permit approval or funding,now or ultimately from any other Govemmental agency,(Federal,State or Local)? YES ( )NO If Yes,list agency(s)and permit/approvals: SC)PPoi-t- coo ko" T_-),51pr. cod. `I LA-4-T44- 8©c�tot� 11.Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval? ( )YES ( NO If Yes,list agency(s)and pemtit/approvais: 12 As a result of proposed action,will existing permit/approval require modification? ( )YES I "NO if Yes,list agency(s)and permit/approvals: I certffy that the Information provided above Is true to the best of my knowledge Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date: 02 Signature: If the action is In the Coastal Area,and you are a state agency,complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessmi I '1'O WN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLIST BUILDING DEPARTMENT D have or need the following,before applying? TOWN-HALL Board of Health SOUTHOLD,NY 11971 3 sets of Building Plans TEL: (631) 765-1802 Planning Board approval FAX: (631) 765-9502 Survey w`ww. northfork.net/Southold/ PERMIT NO. Check Septic Form N.Y.S.D.E.C. Examined '20 Contact:Trustees Approved 20 Mail to: Disapproved a/c_ �I 2j ?, Phone: Expiration 20 - - Buildi Ins ector l `fi AUG 2 2003 r 4� PLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Date 20 0,1Z) F„ _',rrll o INSTRUCTIONS a. This application MUST be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted to the Building Inspector with 3 sets of plans, accurate plot plan to scale.Fee according to schedule. b. Plot plan showing location of lot and of buildings on premises,relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and waterways. c. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before issuance of Building Permit. d. Upon approval of this application,the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant. Such a permit shall be kept on the premises available for inspection throughout the work. e.No building shall be occupied or used in whole or in part for any purpose what so ever until the Building Inspector issues a Certificate of Occupancy. f. Every building permit shall expire if the work authorized has not commenced within 12 months after the date of issuance or has not been completed within 18 months from such date. If no zoning amendments or other regulations affecting the property have been enacted in the interim, the Building Inspector may authorize, in writing, the extension of the permit for an addition six months. Thereafter, a new permit shall be required. APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Department for the issuance of a Building Permit pursuant to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County,New York, and other applicable Laws, Ordinances or Regulations, for the constructli�f of buildings, additions, or alterations or for removal or demolition as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, building code, housing code, and regulations, and to admit authorized inspectors on premises and in building for necessary inspections. Ar ti S k A �1 Y�sZs (Signature of applicant or name,if a corporation) loll((oS MA-1to gz> t Il:r X i T QQYl 10°1 (Mailing address of applicant) State whether applicant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer, general contractor, electrician, plumber or builder a t.-,)i - Name of owner of premises A C:GZli 2AZE:7� (As on the tax roll or latest deed) If applicant is a corporation, signature of duly authorized officer �-RL+IITF���[,ocaE�S (Name and title of corporate officer) Builders License No. Plumbers License No. p OCT 2 9 2003 Electricians'License No. Other Trade's License No. 1. Location of land on which proposed work will be done: a r!1 House Number . Street H T Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Sections Block O Subdivision Lot v. (Name) Filed Map No. Lot 2. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction: a. Existing use and occupancy ,zj�n&j-a PA-m I i-N Dtoaa LL 1 b. Intended use and occupancy � ' ' a 1 " - 3. Nature of work(check which applicable): New Building Addition Alteration Repair Removal Demolition X Other Work (Description) 4. Estimated Cost 1R 41®(Do Fee (To be paid on filing this application) 5. If dwelling,number of dwelling units Number of dwelling units on each floor If garage, number of cars 1 6. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of each type of use. 7. Dimensions of existing structures, if any: Front r2D 1 ?�'� Rear i �'6 Depth Height ao- –0— Number of Stories \ `moi Dimensions of same structure with alterations or additions: Front �Dq —Rear ' Depth i-1 0�_c)-1 Height ��'-d`'` Number of Stories 8. Dimensions of entire new construction: Front Rear Depth Height Number of Stories 9. Size of lot: Front �� - �b� Rear 5- - Depth 'Z)b�S 10. Date of Purchase Name of Former Owner 11. Zone or use district in which premises are situated 40 12. Does proposed construction violate any zoning law, ordinance or regulation? YES->—,/NO 13. Will lot be re-graded? YES NO,>,—, Will excess fill be removed from premises? YES NO . C d✓v►i-�-� L'6 U5170 517 l0 14. Names of Owner of premises -xmEE++ -mtFtF�facpyAddress 192 Poo:D e'1 Phone No. Name of Architect FRA-io Y- OcTar e-n Address I 4)�Cs ya:iio eb,L&jf Phone No, bbl- Name of Contractor Address Phone No. 15 a. Is this property within 100 feet of a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland? *YES NO * IF YES, SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES & D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. b. Is this property within 300 feet of a tidal wetland? * YES >'e NO * IF YES, D.E.C. PERMITS MAY BE REQUIRED. 16. Provide survey, to scale, with accurate foundation plan and distances to property lines. 17. If elevation at any point on property is at 10 feet or below, must provide topographical data on survey. STATE OF NEW YORK) SS: COUNTY OF&- ) i1Gtptr�1L1+ being duly sworn, deposes and says that(s)he is the applicant (Name of individual signing contract) above named, (S)He is the c'�i\j 14 (Contractor, Agent, Corporate Officer, etc.) of said owner or owners, and is duly authorized to perform or have performed the said work and to make and file this application; that all statements contained in this application are true to the best of his knowledge and belief; and that the work will be performed in the manner set forth in the application filed therewith. Sworn to before me this c20 day of 20 0.3 NotaryPublic Signatur f Applicant LINDA J.COOPER Notary Public,State of New York No.4822563,Suffolk County O Term Expires December 31, Town Of Southold P.O Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 * * * RECEIPT Date: 10/30/03 Receipt#: 5306 Transaction(s): Subtotal 1 Application Fees $400.00 Check#: 5306 Total Paid: $400.00 Name: Trencheny, Joseph T. 187 Fonda Rd Rockville Centre, NY 11570 Clerk ID: LINDAC Internal ID:83123 FORM NO. 3 yQu�. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: August 25, 2003 TO: Architecnologies A/C Trencheny R 13405 Main Road Mattituck,NY 11952 AUG 2 6 2003 Please take notice that your application dated July 16, 2003 3 a�r Ls For permit to construct an additions and alterations to an existing single family dwelling at Location of property 120 South Lane, East Marion,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 37 Block 6 Lot 3.2 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction on this non-conforming 13,056 square foot lot in the Residential R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article III Section 100-244B which states that lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size require a total side yard setback of 25 feet. The existing single family dwelling has a total side Yard setback of 22 feet. Following the proposed addition, the building will have a total side yard setback of+/-13 feet. Total lot coverage will be less than 20 percent. orize ature CC: file, Z.B.A. Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require additional review from the Southold Town Building Department. ITECNOLOGIES ARCRTUCrUM PLANNING CONMUMONSMVIMS 13405 U&RoA Mal4mck,New Yank 11952 631.298.1129 fax 631.298.1128 March 16, 2004 Southold Town Board of Appeals `� 6 2004 Southold, N.Y. 2OC �o Z®�1�� SOARd7 OF APP(- LS RE: Joseph Trencheny 120 South Lane East Marion, N.Y. S.C.T.M.# 1000-37-6-3.2 Enclosed please find the following documents for your review: 1. Revised Site Survey to allow 12' property setback on the South/West point of the proposed residence. ( Ref: to site survey dated 3.16.04) Thank you,for your time and consideration. S °n e nct ��@Cvaonpnefiyib�S U �S y ' COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Ct STEVE LEVY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE T, .A Es, AICP DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING •-�, April 26, 2004 MAY- 5 2004 Town of Southold ZoNiftse 8,� o Zoning Board of Appeals Alt Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A 14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the following application(s)submitted to the Suffolk County Planning Commission is/are considered to be a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact(s). A decision of local determination should not be construed as either an approval or a disapproval. Applicant(s) Municipal File Number(s) J&_C Holdings* 5419 Trencheny,Joseph 5453 r Stufano, Mark _ - 5461 Mangus (Gary) and Meyers (Miriam) 5475 Bancroft, Martin J. Jr.** 5484 Suter, Don&Irene 5489 Willot,Richard&Nancy 5491 Ventura, Arthur and Ruth** 5495 Setaro, Joseph&Frances 5496 *Alternative relief appears warranted consistent with appropriate developmental restrictions, particularly as set forth by the Z.B.A. **Premises should be encumbered by appropriate developmental restrictions,particularly as set forth by the Z.B.A. Very truly yours, Thomas Isles Director of Planning S/s Gerald G. Newman Chief Planner GGN:cc G\CCHORNYIZONING\ZONING\WORKING\LD2004\APR\SD5419.APR LOCATION MAILING ADDRESS H. LEE DENNISQ4 BLDG -4TH FLOOR ■ P O. BOX 6I 00 ■ (5 16)853-5 190 100 VETERANS MEMORIAL HIGHWAY HAUPPAUGE, NY 1 1788-0099 TELECOPIER(5 16) 853-4044 APPEALS BOARD MEMBEL Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Ruth D.Oliva,Chairwoman P.O.Box 1179 Gerard P.Goehringer Southold,New York 11971-0959 Lydia A.Tortora 'Telephone(631)765-1809 Vincent Orlando ZBA Fax(631)765-9064 James Dinizio http://southoldtown.northfork.net BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 23, 2004 Mr. Gerald G. Newman;:Chief Planner Suffolk County Department of Planning P. O. Box 6100 Hauppauge, NY 11788-0099 Dear Mr. Newman: Please find enclosed for your review, the following decisions, applications, surveys, tax maps, building disapprovals, and related information for review pursuant to Article XIV of the Suffolk County Administrative Code; within 500 feet of: R— STATE OR COUNTY ROAD W—WATERWAY (BAY, SOUND, OR ESTUARY) B — BOUNDARY OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED COUNTY, STATE, FEDERAL LAND ZBA NAME ACTION REQUESTED /VARIANCE R W B 5419 J&C HOLDINGS NEW DWELLING — FRONT YARD & BLUFF SB X 5453 TRENCHENY CHANGE 1 Y2 STY TO 2 STY HOME — SYSB X 5461 STUFANO NEW HOUSE — REAR YARD SETBACK X 5474 MANGUS ADDN/ALT— SIDE YARD & BULKHEAD SB X- 5484 BANCROFT LAP POOL— SIDE YARD LOCATION X 5489 SUTER RELOCATE & ADDN GAR— F/SY & LOT CVRG X 5491 WILLOTT CARPORT ADDN — REAR YARD SETBACK X 5495 VENTURA NEW HOUSE — BLUFF SETBACK ix 5496 SETARO ADDN'S /ALTS — SYSB I 1XI If any other information is needed, please do not hesitate to call us. Thank you. Very truly yours, Jess Boger Enc. cc: ZBA Staff ' - Y , V/ ./ ~ [ vv ~ 18U . �uSOUI�H5 LANE r .0 EAST MARION , NY 1014 11939-0005 ' , MARCH 9 2004 ov RE : VARIANCE REQUEST . JOSEPH TRENCHENY #5453 SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS P .O . BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD , NY 11971 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN : I WRITE TO YOU REPRESENTING MYSELF AND MY WIFE , PAULA C T|K]RP , AND MY BROTHER AND HIS WIFE , EDWARD AND VIRGINIA THORP OF 80 SOUTH LANE . WE ARE THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ABOVE APPEAL . MR. JOSEPH TRENCHENY MET WITH MY WIFE AND MYSELF ON MARCH 7 [H . AT THAT TIME HE WENT OVER HIS PLANS FOR HIS NEW HOUSE . HE INDICATED AT THAT TIME THAT PART OF THE NEW HOUSE WILL BE BUILT ON THE EXISTING FOUNDATION , WHICH SUPPORTS A CRAWL SPACE OF ABOUT SIXTEEN INCHES . AFTER REVIEWING THE PLANS WITH MY BROTHER WE STILL REQUEST lHAT THE WEST SETBACK BE INCREASED TO 20 FEET GIVING lHE [OTAL SIDE YARD SETBACKS OF 23 .4 CLOSE TO THE 25 FEET REQUIRED . WE ALSO REQUEST THAT IF THE PRESENT FOUNDATION IS NOT USED THAT THE VARIANCE BE VOID , THUS REQUIRING THAT THE NEW CONSTPUCTION BE BUILT TO THE 25 FOOT CODE . WE APPKECIA [E YOUR CONSIDERATION TO OUR REQUEST . /' FrlRAN1--*. S 'TH6RP CC : JOSEPH TRENCHENY 18 1 2 will build a house with a tennis court . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Thank you. 3 Any questions? If not I ' ll move close the hearing and reserve decision until later. 4 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Second. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: All in favor? 5 (Whereupon, all Board Members responded in favor. ) 6 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Opposed? So moved. Thank you for coming in. 7 ------------------------------------------------- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Our next 8 application is Trencheny at South Lane in East Marion. And they have submitted other plans 9 because the neighbor had requested, I believe, a 21 foot setback rather than the one that was 10 submitted. And is Aggie here? MR. NOTARO: Actually, I'm here 11 today. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Good, how are 12 you? MR. NOTARO : My name is Frank 13 Notaro . I 'm the architect for Mr. and Mrs . Trencheny. 14 After last month' s meeting and a letter that was received by Mr. Trencheny, he 15 requested us to look at various options and questions that you had also . We have showed 16 the second floor setback now at 7' 611 . You had requested a little bit less than that but it 17 works out and the client is happy with that solution. The client asked us to explore 18 possibly a compromise between his original request and the request by his neighbor, 19 Mr. Thorpe, and we came up with a number of 17' 611 , which is splitting the difference 20 between the two . My client feels that that is a workable solution to what they' re looking 21 for. This will be a permanent house at one point in the future . Right now my client 22 cannot be here, they just gave birth to a baby and they' re kind of involved at this point . 23 By the way, we have not received any feedback from Mr. Trencheny regarding Mr. Thorpe, so I 24 don' t think he got any additional feedback on that . Perhaps you have received a letter 25 subsequently. So basically, that' s what we have done since the last meeting. February 26 , 2004 19 1 2 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Goehringer, do you have any questions? 3 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I think that is a fairly good compromise, 4 Mr. Notaro. The only question I have, is there going to be the ability to make a turn 5 to utilize the south part or the southeast part of the lot? That 10 feet looks kind of 6 tight . There, are you going to be able to utilize that? 7 MR. NOTARO: We believe so . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: From a 8 fire and emergency point of view, since it' s on that angle, that may be a little difficult . 9 I don' t know if you could round it, if you could clip it, whatever the case might be, but 10 you really need like 12 feet . That' s just my opinion. 11 MR. NOTARO : Sure . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Orlando? 12 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: It' s split right down the middle . No questions at this 13 time . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mrs . Tortora? 14 BOARD MEMBER TORTORA: No. The only thing that I would share is the concern 15 for fire access, because I think that corner, that 10 foot, particularly at that angle, you 16 could really run into some problems with trying to navigate a fire truck. And I'm not 17 even sure that you could because of the sharp angle of the property line . What is along 18 that property line, Mr. Notaro? MR. NOTARO: I believe from my 19 recollection is like hedging there . BOARD MEMBER TORTORA: There is 20 hedging? MR. NOTARO: I 'm not 100 percent 21 sure . It' s been a while since I looked at the property. We could look into that, and I feel 22 we could take that into consideration, and I feel we could probably modify the plans to 23 accommodate that . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: It may 24 even look architecturally nice . Excuse me, Lydia. 25 BOARD MEMBER TORTORA: That' s all . MR. NOTARO: It would give me a February 26, 2004 20 1 2 good excuse to use angles again. We would definitely look into that . That is a 3 consideration. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: I would agree 4 too because we' re kind of concerned about being able to get fire equipment around our 5 houses . It' s important . Mr. Dinizio? BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: Yes . I 6 have a note here that says you' re going to remove the house; you' re going to take the 7 house down and build a new one; is that right? MR. NOTARO : Well, no, they' re 8 going to take it down to the first floor deck. It' s really not structurally stable to build a 9 new second floor on the existing walls . BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: All the 10 walls are going to come down, just the foundation and the deck on the foundation. So 11 essentially you' re tearing the house down? MR. NOTARO: We' re reutilizing 12 the foundation and the first floor deck and probably some of the walls if it' s possible to 13 use them. We haven' t opened everything up to see the full extent . Just by judging by what 14 we could see, the structure is not up to today' s code, so to speak. 15 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO : I think you did a nice job on compromise . And as far as 16 the driveway' s concerned, the fire department' s going to get in there whether you 17 have a curb in there or not, believe me . It' s not going to make that much difference . Thank 18 you. MR. NOTARO: Thank you. 19 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Thorpe? MR. THORPE : Good morning, I 'm 20 Frank Thorpe . I live at 180 South Lane, the property to the east, and this morning I'm 21 also representing my brother and his wife, Edward Thorpe and Virginia Thorpe, who live at 22 80 South Lane, the property immediately to the west . This word compromise has just come up . 23 No one has ever talked to me about this at all, from Mr. Trencheny or his architects . I 24 apologize to you people for not having this testimony in writing, but this was only 25 submitted on Monday; I became aware of it on Tuesday, and I was not able to communicate February 26 , 2004 21 1 2 with my brother until last night . We both strongly request that the westerly setback be 3 established at 20 feet . This would give a combined east/west setback of 23 . 4 feet, which 4 would be in conformity with all the other setbacks required in the community. 5 We thank you for consideration in this matter. 6 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Do you have anything else you would like to say? 7 MR. NOTARO : If I can just respond to that . I can give you for the 8 record a copy of the letter by Mr. Trencheny sent to Mr. Thorpe . He asked us to review it . 9 We looked at it, we agreed with it, and he supposedly sent it, we' re not 100 percent 10 sure, but I can give you a copy. That was sent on January 26th. 11 MS . KOWALSKI : Thank you. BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: Can I ask a 12 question? MR. THORPE : Just to respond to 13 that, if you look at the last paragraph of Mr. Trencheny' s letter, it says, "As we get closer 14 to finalizing the plans, my intention it is to set up a meeting with you at your convenience 15 and review the options the architects have come up with. " 16 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : And that didn' t happen? 17 MR. THORPE : No. Since they were only submitted on Monday. 18 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: And you would be happy with 20 feet of side yard? 19 MR. THORPE : Yes . It would conform with the 3 . 4 from my side to just a 20 little under the 25 feet combined sideyard, and it' s required of everybody else since the 21 code went into effect . And which also has been required for the property two doors away, 22 the Walzes, which you spent a great deal of time on. Questions? Thank you. 23 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Notaro, do you have anything to add? 24 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO : I ' d like to ask Mr. Notaro a question. What would be 25 involved in making that a 20 foot setback? MR. NOTARO : It' s kind of February 26 , 2004 22 1 2 difficult to explain that . We did explore that issue . 3 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO : What would be involved? I 'm talking about dollars and 4 cents; what would you have to do to make a 20 foot setback on that side that you' re not 5 willing to do? BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Which is a 6 new construction, by the way. BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: I don' t 7 know. I'm asking him, how would you come to that 20 foot setback if we required it? 8 MR. NOTARO : Either the client would have to be satisfied with a smaller 9 footprint and second floor, or they would go out further towards the water side . Those are 10 the two possibilities . BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: It doesn' t 11 mean digging up the foundation and that kind of stuff? 12 MR. NOTARO : No, not of the present house, that would remain. 13 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Notaro, your lot to the south is very narrow going 14 down to the harbor, would it be difficult to extend the house in that direction without 15 coming back for another variance? MR. NOTARO: I really would have 16 it look at that, I couldn' t answer you right now. It' s all how the layout works inside . 17 As it is, we've compressed it a little bit now. We' d have to look into that . 18 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: What is the Board' s pleasure, to keep this open or to 19 close the hearing? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I just 20 want to say before, if you go to the southeast, it' s going to further exacerbate 21 that -- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: It is the 10 22 foot . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: The 10 23 foot . I was thinking, Mr. Notaro, what if you held 20 feet to the garage, okay, and the 24 garage would be 17' 6" , and then put a small addition on the front of the house . 25 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Cut it in? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Yes . February 26, 2004 23 1 2 You know, to make up the difference of what you lost on the 17' 611 . That' s the only real 3 I think genuine compromise that could exist . I mean, South Drive is a private road and 4 there are buildings closer to this than this house is, not that it makes any difference . 5 MR. NOTARO : There is an infinite amount of possibilities that can be done . The 6 only thing, again, in defense of what we' re proposing is, it' s not an overwhelming scale 7 of a home, and I can show you two cases that I think are extraordinary in terms of how they 8 present themselves to the road right in the neighborhood to this home . Again, they didn' t 9 intend to make a McMansion there . This is a home that they feel will be liveable in the 10 future for them. There' s an infinite amount of possibilities for everything. They felt, 11 and they directed us to compromise with the request of the neighbor. That was the 12 direction we had from the client . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : But the 13 meeting never took place as addressed in the letter? 14 MR. NOTARO: I don' t know that . In other words, our client added that in the 15 end of his letter. I don' t know what went on after the letter was sent, but that was sent 16 on the 24th. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : Stating by 17 the neighbor, it didn' t happen. MR. NOTARO : Obviously it didn' t 18 go on, but we had no knowledge of this, and the client did not contact us . 19 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: I think we can close the hearing if you agree to the 20 20 foot setback, otherwise, we' ll have to keep it open. 21 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: I think we ought to keep it open in deference to the 22 gentleman that got up before, and let them work out a compromise . 23 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : Maybe the meeting should happen. 24 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Jerry? MR. NOTARO: I can' t honestly 25 speak for the Trenchenys at this point . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: I think we' ll February 26 , 2004 24 1 2 keep the meeting:Aopen, and have that meeting with the Trenchenys and come back again next t 3 month. MR. NOTARO : Okay. 4 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: The date will be March 18th at 9 :30 . 5 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: All in favor? (Whereupon, all Board Members 6 responded in favor. ) -®CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: So moved. 7 ------------------------- ------------------------ CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Our next 8 application is for Patricia Zanaboni for a new single family dwelling at less than 35 feet, 9 after demolishing the existing building. Is there anybody here to represent? 10 MS . ZANABONI : Hello, I 'm Patricia Zanaboni, I think it' s misspelled, it' s 11 Z-A-N-A-B-O-N-I . I wish I was part of the ice machine family, but I'm riot . 12 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Okay, MS . ZANABONI : As you will be able 13 to tell from the documents you have, Architect Notaro and his staff have set the house back 14 another 10 feet, as you requested, to 23 feet . That said, I am still requesting a compromise, 15 a couple of extra feet . The house has been there since the ' 40s . It' s been in my family 16 since 1954 . This is 50 years we have had a lot of good years . It' s been a summer home . 17 Unfortunately, we can' t live there permanently especially if we want to have children. There 18 isn' t enough room. If we were to renovate, we could probably keep the same footprint and 19 stay exactly the way we are, but the construction is not stable enough to add a 20 second story. We could expand and stay in one story, that would be adding another 1, 500 21 square feet or so to our lot coverage, requiring us to take down several trees and 22 becoming closer to our neighbors . I don' t think the elevation that we' re requesting is 23 substantial . We' re really looking at one and-a-half stories . So what I'm asking for is 24 another five feet . If you look, we were measuring the south stake of our house, i 25 Minnehaha and Opeache, that set in about 10 feet from the road per se. So the 13 feet, - , February 26, 2004 ,* ' _ V:` M1'a c 'i - , , �S v l� Lt`: ti' ,r yt .} •'j• '-,Pf ' s, Y _ ,, v r . . `' S�, V' ry q n,i z "" ,ti wA,z _ 1.', i Y��` f ` Paha, - a 1,-,'�"- Q?Y - ". •9 /4'' 1` - $. @q.` 1 .3�A-�estll`mel�'•D�t�e"' -';•" -_ - / • 1-! fid'. '� _ i1 f' r �J' 'f` iy'•: i'= _ T `C �` ;" erp ,`'; ``A• 4-, `'/ �- 6 Yi- `6 ti�ri 1{ '' ,11� `,\�' it - F aii y yi - i' r {; t.~ `': ' '_l'y •`f1, ''1--'` / _ ti,, i` \ /,' ;'i' _ T t' - _ - .r\• 1 Baa ,wx�.�"e`.'�.�w.".... _ _ Y:'. Y' p 4. A h ,vJ _ '` ` , ,,�,. -fit' - - --_ ,al' - , ,- - - .j,, , _f -t' •", ., - -ti'' 5� Fay, 1'.` ') 7 ,.Ln '' _ _ _, -! - t? r^: ..I z R``' Southold,-TbWh,Board of•AA .gals- - -, f, ,,r 2.004 „ .3,: ,4 `P.O.,Box',1179 ';'., _ - -11,11110 �11 _-.r"jr .L.Southold' NewYork`,1-197.1` - • ';'.� ,: - - ,"I' ll g� �•# - AL ,r "r '-,Re:-'varianc_17e';application`of.Jose ^h'and;Elizabeth-T'r n ,,, ;' tqD ►s :,' p, a cherry. - �. N�, ,�', +� - -s - - ry'y , s• - - 'fit:`. ,'a, ;,r: - ,' - _ - -_; .� - - - �.."� - - _ - ,.,, 'i'- ,c; - _,7 _ �rz e - _ _ r,}.,.f -1.1 til ,� Dear.Sk orMadam:/ 'E. = ,', ` ;a, - '1- `Y' '�:� , , `-�� `"i', - -,', `,T '�- _ .v" 4,- '\_ of _ -- _- _ - - - _ - - - r'-'4' - - �r - ,We�ownra�tiome`'at,;6 •O,S"Iv' n?D {. 0 y a rive`'in East Maiion that-is`locatetl`in the`'privatecomm,unit`,':of ';. :.Gard'iners Bay;';Estates,:'As'weeKend antl summer, residents'for the'' ast`,fourteen ears';;,and'= u.=F' ho ieowner_s;for-the;p-ast'`eighti,years'.we appreciate'and.liold:dear_the�.beaut`•'of`th'e'Nort'ti For'k.l y- - ' ' ; Ir" I } :,;"Gardiner s Bay"-<Estates' is,;a 'rfiav,en ',of 'all 'the'North:`•Fork;`offers:`"°'a—beautiful•',°beach`` an ti' p abie.boat:dock',�.comfortable and'well-maint"ifained:homes; good''neighbors-,and`a'Yfa'"I' c,'; Fz< friend) atmos here: ;: . - „•= ' r Y P - -- r:' - - I 1, �fe.Li - rte _ .rN 1 '- 'ie 1 . - f� ,�,- '41 'r - , - ,_-We=wholeh`eartedl s'u ort'aose %and,Elizabeth'3,Trbhchen s•r ` N, Y pp P. y. equest for=awariance`in4regard to' _ . F.' ` theirhomearenovation',in ourrycorrimunit t1Ne have'reviewed the:Tienched" '�;,`r," :yl_ >r;'',," _ - h y ys,plans an'd-l'ike`many',- _ v, �,of,_.-,Ihe fecent:homes-r'enouatibm` projects in:,G ardiner's'�Bay�-i states;r •their.h'ome will•:bei'well'_- '`f, '` `� `,�I, =;` des' neJ and`.true�-:to,the`s p i`rit-of-°.our:-'Comm unit J-7;``Th' 'T . s'r .J'r �' :',.r, 9, p.,- y•,;,, e= renchenys, plans have b'een''•,vVell ,: - "',r, executedb 'a°local;archi ectl-an y; "t d'we'areconfident,th'e ficial.result will'be'=a,welcome addition.fo _ '` , Athe_'nei•`hborhood:��, ,i:,.;, ,�1 ,, }, • -_ ,'Y", , ;,; Y17. �JosbP -Trenchen s.'roots`.in 'the.Gardiners'Ba- ,Estates comrriunit' are°un arall h T. :Y_ _r y., y,' p e ed; and ,few .,,-, ,•;-:families`p`ersonify',our,:comiiiuiiity-like;he-,"and his;wife:; We;su ort'their,:desire`torim-'rov' 'arid' , `Jr PP,., P„. . ` a' '" _ b'eautify,ttieir home'and,`applaud',their;efforts to enhance th"e'neighborhood ana, reserve the's irit`" - � rr, t t, f P, _, P _ ; .r;•; of,our_co" , ""ity`out of'res•ect'fortheir dei' hbors: - �' - ,-, 1 - ;ter `i, '.\ _ It _1 :Y: _ _ 'r ,_if ��s: _ }•� _ _ •, -i, \-/.. .. �z,'.lir - — - -' _ _\!i _ _ _ _ 7•_,- - -t-,., ,Sincere) ;, Y.;:` - 1 i G - -• - - - fir' _ .` _ �,- - •� Fl _ _ rl _ _ 'zt - _ _ '� _ _ _ - 'LJ _ - - - v'b- J' '* i. _ fJ - t f�� Y'' `k_ Cis?, • w, . ,I I , I I ��:,,, ,- � , ,(:,,_,'�,,,- ,11", , , -" ,I I� .'tr \5 - - ,,Patrick;McG;oldric4t,�; ,k--A', - ,'.' 9, - ", ;3' ' '-Sal' - - ' �i J.,, - - `er, _ 'k., is i - :,'r,--,,1-:j - 4— . T" - - t'' - - - � - _.F r..'h� i5- _ <�r }I' _ _ _ J!` it 3 n ti ✓' J�'- ''1,�'" j' - .ry. - .S - - - L"%'� - _ ''J:'-`F'� 'icy' },; . C11 � atherine McGol rick', A_A= ,,t,, - ,,;�,. 'a r'' 1'•"'`' - •ice - t`. -A; :k;, - '�,.� _ - - .S - - _ _f - I I'll I, - - - - X17 - - �,,," Y'_ -- >,'- rv' - - 1•- ~''�e"" - ,` '}, -1 - _ _; :,Cr - ,r._tea - _ -�J Iz, - CY' _ .1'Y- lr,{� - _ - ./.y• r' - ,.7 Y; - tSz - -/ - - .p,`',. raw• _ _ - - ✓,'- _ 5 Pte- _ ,•9S,' . - _ J}� , _ ll_ ^'};' +4.,- 27 2 9 : 35, okay? j- MS . WICKHAM: Okay. And I think 3 we will come in with more information about the drainage and the fill figures . I do want 4 to just -- I think I addressed most of Mr. Hughes' comments, I'm not going to do it 5 again now. But the work that was done on the lot was after consulting with the Building 6 Department, merely to punch a small hole through a small level of clay, and there was a 7 little bit of sand to put there to effectuate better drainage because there was a mosquito 8 problem, but there was not fill added to elevate the lot at all . But I will give you 9 more information on what that is going to entail . Also regarding the Oyster Pond court, 10 that' s a hard court, makes a lot more noise than this, which would be a soft court . 11 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Thank you. Make a motion to recess this hearing and keep it 12 open until February 26th. BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: So 13 moved. f CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Second? 14 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : Second. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: All in favor? 15 (Whereupon, all Board Members responded in favor. ) 16 ----------------------------------------------- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Our next 17 application is for Joseph Trencheny -- I hope I'm pronouncing that right? -- On South Lane 18 in East Marion. MS . DROZDOWSKA: My name is 19 Agnieszka Drozdowska from Architecnologies . Mr. Trencheny is apologizing he is 20 not able to be present . His wife is having a tough pregnancy. So hopefully, next month 21 will be better, we would like to postpone it, and I would also like to tell you that we will 22 add information on we have received a letter from Mr. Thorp, our next door neighbor, and 23 his concern is with the side yard setback. It' s a non-conforming lot and East Marion is a 24 very tricky area, as we all know. He especially has a very tough situation with the 25 setback. One side is a 3 foot 6 setback and the opposite side, which is neighboring with a January 22 , 2004 28 1 2 neighbor' s driveway, is a total setback of 34 feet . His existing house is 20 feet wide by 3 40 feet deep. Mr. Trencheny would like to expand on the size of the house . He has five 4 kids, his fifth one is on the way, and he would like to enjoy the neighborhood and stay 5 within a reasonable -impact of the environment, which wouldn' t be so great . We' d like to keep 6 the house as friendly and as neighborhood friendly I guess I should say as possible . 7 We are proposing a house with a four bedroom living space . One bedroom 8 downstairs and another three up above. It is existing one and-a-half story, about eight 9 year old house . It is falling apart . We are planning to restore as much as we can of the 10 existing with an addition to the side of it to the west side of the existing house . As you 11 can see, the property splays out . It is a flat lot . We are proposing a 15 foot setback. 12 Mr. Thorpe in his letter proposed 20 foot setback, 23 foot 6 . Mr. Trencheny has not had 13 a chance to review the letter. He' s -, apologizing again. He is not having a good 14 time right now. It' s something we can look into. It' s something that I would ask if we 15 can look for some feedback in seeing what we can do to accomplish a reasonable size house . 16 He is looking for a one car garage . We are trying to fit that within the house . We are 17 doing our best to accommodate his wishes and Mr. Thorpe' s wishes . Before we go along with 18 anything we do have to take care of -- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Did you want to 19 postpone this hearing? MS . DROZDOWSKA: We would like to 20 postpone until next month. I ' m sure the Board has received a letter as well . Mr. Trencheny 21 has received it on Saturday. We will have a meeting with Mr. Trencheny, the owner, next 22 week possibly to speak any further on. Would it be feasible for our office to submit 23 revised plans to what we can do to accommodate Mr. Thorpe, and I 'm asking if at all possible 24 for us to do that? CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Let me see if 25 the Board has any questions of you the way it' s presented in the notice . Mr. Orlando? January 22 , 2004 29 1 2 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Yes . Right now you' re looking for a 50 percent reduction 3 in the current code, so I'm speaking for myself, I would be more favorable to the 4 neighbor' s request of a 20 percent setback. MS . DROZDOWSKA: Everything is _ 5 doable obviously. But if that would be the only way out, I think if that' s what the Board 6 would decide on. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: That' s just 7 my opinion to your neighbor' s request . MS . DROZDOWSKA: We don' t want to 8 stretch this . They want to start building soon, obviously, and move in possibly at the 9 end of the summer. So any way that we can. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : It' s tight 10 quarters there, and it' s five foot makes the neighbor happy then it' s continuity amongst 11 neighbors . MS . DROZDOWSKA: The neighbor has 12 mentioned that if we had come up with the 20 foot setback, it would be as equal to all the 13 other neighboring lots . We have not done research on it . We don' t feel, we ourselves, - 14 our office has constructed a few homes in that area, and we don' t believe that that' s the 15 case . And we would like to look into it and come up with that and come present possibly -- 16 I mean, this letter just jumped on us . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : You know my 17 feelings . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Dinizio? 18 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: Certainly any research you do in that regard would be 19 helpful for the Board, and it' s difficult for us to drive through the neighborhood. You 20 certainly have a compelling reason to do that . 21 MS . DROZDOWSKA: Mr. Trencheny would not like to compromise so much because 22 as he quoted me on the phone yesterday, why should I? I would like to see if I can do 23 something and come up with a nice house and still accommodate the neighbors, but why 24 should I be losing out when the lots - - we all know they' re very tight lots . They all have 25 very tight setbacks, and we like to research it a little more . January 22 , 2004 30 1 2 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: I agree '. with Mr. Orlando, you' re asking an awful lot . 3 The way it is right now -- MS. DROZDOWSKA: We realize 4 that . BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: I for one, 5 if it were just me you probably wouldn' t even be here . But there are laws in the Town and 6 we can' t -- I' ll encourage you to do that . MS. DROZDOWSKA: So the next 7 meeting is on the 26th? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I' d like 8 to know the height of the roof on the left-hand side, the east/northeast side of the 9 house where you have a 3 . 4 foot setback. We have had numerous discussions with neighbors 10 and applications on that particular side where the setbacks are so substandard that I have a 11 specific concern on that side . MS . DROZDOWSKA: This is on the 12 east side? CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: It' s still -- 13 that' s the one-story existing house? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: It' s a - 14 really two-story one . MS . DROZDOWSKA: To be honest with 15 you, everything is a non-conforming house basically. 16 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I think we have to establish one thing, that this 17 house is going to be a complete tear down? MS . DROZDOWSKA: We' re trying to 18 save it, but in the long run it' s a lot of money we believe . It' s not efficient to just 19 tear the whole thing down, besides the fact that there is these old features in the 20 house . It' s a lot of money, it' s a very nice cottage; it' s beautiful . We' re afraid of rot, 21 I mean, we haven' t opened the house . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I ' m 22 looking at the limitation of that story on that side where you have the greatest 23 non-conforming setback. MS . DROZDOWSKA: We' re looking at 24 about 22 . 6 . We' re looking no more than that, that' s the top of the ridge . It could be less 25 with the different heights and different roof pitches . January 22 , 2004 31 1 2 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: It has always been my opinion that a homeowner should 3 have to place a ladder on his or her own property and not be on the neighbor' s property 4 so as to work on the house, and that ' s what I'm concerned about . 5 MS . DROZDOWSKA: That' s the tough setback that we are dealing with 6 unfortunately. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: I would agree 7 with most all of them that you really should look to see if you can compromise with your 8 neighbor, do research to see the other facilities in the neighborhood, if they' re 9 very close, and also Mr. Goehringer' s concern about the height of the house with the ridge . 10 MS . DROZDOWSKA: So would you like us to look in to lessening the house? 11 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: So to one-story on that side, even if you cut it 12 four feet in. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: If there' s no 13 other questions, I will keep this hearing open and postpone it until February 26th at -- 14 MS . KOWALSKI : 9 :35 . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: -- 9 : 35 . 15 MS . KOWALSKI : Aggie, if you have amended plans -- 16 MS . DROZDOWSKA: We actually have come up with plans since we got the letter. 17 That does help. We did not do the elevation change . We' ll look into that, and we' ll 18 submit the plans into the next hearing. I should just stay up here . 19 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: We need to vote . 20 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: May I have a vote, I move that we postpone to the 26th. 21 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Second. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: All in favor? 22 (Whereupon, all Board Members responded in favor. ) 23 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: So moved. ----------------------------------------------- 24 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Next application is Isabelle and Samuel Distasi for 25 additions and alterations to the existing single family dwelling with a front yard January 22 , 2004 32 1 - - 2 setback at less than 35 feet, at 125 Youngs Avenue in Southold. 3 MR. STRANG: Good morning, Garret Strang representing the applicant, Mr. and 4 Mrs . Distasi . What we have proposed here' s is a 5 brief history, the house is an older home, original home that dates back probably to 6 somewhere around the late 1800s when the original house was built, and at some time and 7 possibly originally there was a front porch on that house . We do have a survey which I 8 believe is part of the application that we presented that isn' t that old, but the survey 9 is dated in 157 -- ' 57 or ' 59, I can' t tell from the copy we have, and it shows an 10 existence of a porch on the east side of the road, Youngs Avenue side, which wraps around 11 the north side of the house . Over the years, that porch disappeared as well as many of the 12 other architectural features of the house . It' s kind of a big box now. My client would 13 like to restore some of the architectural character of the house, bring it back 14 somewhat . And part of that is to reinstate that porch on the Youngs Avenue side of the 15 house, and wrap it around the opposite side from the way it originally was; wrap it around 16 the south side as opposed to the north side . He' s also seeking to enhance that porch 17 somewhat by the addition of an octagonal corner where it makes the wrap, and what 18 happens in that case is that the porch that was originally there had a setback of 24 feet, 19 which we' re looking to reinstate . It was nonconforming originally, obviously, it ' s 20 nonconforming now and the octagonal corner would reduces it to 20 feet . The impact, in 21 my opinion, is really not that great . It' s an open porch, it' s roofed over. But it' s 22 unenclosed; it' s open. The one corner sort of overlooks the community park and marina, 23 across the street is a very large lot with a house that' s set way back, and immediately to 24 the west the house is on the corner of Mechanic and -- sorry, I'm forgetting the name 25 of the street, Petty and that setback, it wouldn' t even have a view of the porch. So I January 22 , 2004 33 1 - 2 believe that the impact of the neighborhood -- there is one house sort of across Youngs and a 3 little bit up, I don' t know if they have an objection, I haven' t seen anything in the 4 file. But that' s pretty much what we' re attempting to accomplish here . I' ll be happy _ 5 to answer any questions the Board may have . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Goehringer? 6 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Not at this time, thank you. 7 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: He' s thinking. I can smell the wood burning. Mr. Dinizio? 8 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: No . It looks like mostly you' re squaring off the 9 house except for that little piece that sticks out . I have no objections, no questions . 10 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Mr. Orlando? BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: The 11 hexagon, is that going to have a turret-type roof on that corner? 12 MR. STRANG: I haven' t gotten into the actual architectural design. Obviously, 13 we haven' t done the design yet subject to what this Board has to say, but if the Board had an 14 objection to -- what we' re seeing a lot of these days and we could do it flatter . 15 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : Because of the topography, because it' s up on the hill - - 16 MR. STRANG: That' s true . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : I don' t 17 have a problem even extending it . It just gets real close on that one corner. What do 18 you believe of the client' s interpretation of this standard wraparound and will cut back a 19 couple feet? MR. STRANG: As opposed to the 20 octagonal corner and directly but that was one of their desires, if you tell, right from the 21 get-go would be to have this nice feature on the corner, again, help embellish and bring 22 back some of the character. It tends to dress it up a little more, but I can defer to 23 Mr. and Mrs . Distasi . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: You 24 think it would make that much difference in reference to footage? 25 BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : Only -- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: There' s so many January 22 , 2004 34 1 - 2 trees down and I hardly even noticed that that house was even there, to be honest . 3 BOARD MEMBER DINIZIO: You' re going to end up setting it back maybe a foot 4 and-a-half more, it doesn' t look like it sticks out that much more . 5 MR. STRANG: If we squared it off we' d be going from a 20 foot at the octagon 6 back to the 24, would make it a little more bland, I' ll say, at least the octagon does add 7 a little more interest and character in keeping with reflected that detail at that 8 time. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Do your clients 9 have anything they would like to say? MR. STRANG: Do you want to share 10 your thoughts on the octagon on the corner? MR. DISTASI : I'm trying to 11 remember the footage there is from the road. CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Would you give 12 your name, sir? MR. DISTASI : Sam Distasi . 13 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Thank you. n MR. DISTASI : I've been 14 maintaining that property all these years . I maintain about 25 feet all around my house . 15 Even my driveway that I maintain belongs to the Town, is larger than most driveways, you 16 know. And it' s really -- on the map it looks like it' s close, but it' s really setback very 17 far from the road because the way the property' s cut . The road goes straight and 18 the property cuts in on an angle . CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: As I say, I 19 didn' t know your house was there . BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO : I'm 20 actually on the fence . I would actually go with whatever the Board favors on this one . 21 My heels aren' t dug in. MR. DISTASI : My grandchildren are 22 talking about it already, how they' re going to be sitting out on that porch. 23 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Thank you. Is there anybody else in the audience that would 24 like to speak on this application? If not -- BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: One 25 question, Mr. Strang. You' re going to give us a plan showing the height of the roof lowered January 22 , 2004 35 1 2 a little bit? MR. STRANG: We can give you an 3 elevation view of this subject to approval - - I mean, I don' t know how the Board might want 4 to word that, approval with this . BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Subject 5 to your plan. MS . KOWALSKI : You want to see it 6 before you vote on it? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Yes . 7 MS . KOWALSKI : February 26th, it will have to be in before that . 8 MR. STRANG: Okay. And your preference, if I understand correctly, is to 9 have a lower pitch -- the same pitch on the octagon that would be on the porch roof, which 10 is the shallow pitch, as opposed to one of these tall "witches hats" so to speak. Is 11 that correct? BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Yes . 12 MR. DISTASI : That' s no problem. BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: I think 13 that' s a very good point . We haven' t had a chance to discuss it, and I didn' t want to 14 prejudice any discussions we would have . I tend to agree with you, I think a lower pitch 15 on the octagon would be more -- I mean if it was a true Victorian and had another turret in 16 it, it would blend it . MR. STRANG: Good point . 17 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: I' d like to make a motion to close this hearing and 18 reserve decision. BOARD MEMBER ORLANDO: Second. 19 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: All in favor? (Whereupon, all Board Members 20 responded in favor. ) CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: So moved. 21 BOARD MEMBER GOEHRINGER: Pending the receipt of the elevation. 22 % CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Pending receipt of the elevation. 23 CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: Going to take a five minute break. 24 (Whereupon, a recess was taken from 10 : 55 a.m. to 11 : 15 a.m. ) 25 ----------------------------------------------- CHAIRWOMAN OLIVA: The next January 22 , 2004 OFFICIAL USE ONLY -'`-JOSEPH TRENCHENY-5453 (AOGIE)-VO ,a< CHANGE 1 '/2 TO 2 STY HOME-SYS13 =' 120 SOUTH LANE EAST MARION 37-6-3.2 Checklist for new projects: CALL APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE FOR AVAILIBILITY LABEL: (4) INCLUDE NAME, AGENT, TM#, ZBA#, ZONE, MBR'S INITIALS, PROJECT, VARIANCE, ADDRESS —top/front fldr, checklist sheet, 1St pg. appl CTY TAX MAP 8 CPES —2 W/NEIGHBORS CIRCLED AND #'S WRITTEN (1 FOR APPL & 1 FOR FILE TO BE STAPLED TO RT INSIDE FOLDER k�,AMAILINGS: INCLUDE COVER LTR, SIGN, AFFS SIGN PSTG & MLG, CHAP 58, LEGAL NOTICE - COPY OF ALL BUT AFFS & 58 IN FLDR RT vll ASSESSORS CARD PULL NOD FROM BD - 7 CPES — 1 ON FLDR RT SIDE INDEX CARD — MAKE NEW OR ATTACH /ADD ON TO OLD IF PRIOR RESEARCH PRIORS — INDEX CARDS, LASERFICHE, — 6 CPES OF DEC (1 RT SIDE FLDR) - CPE INDEX CARD, STAPLE TO INSIDE RT SIDE IN FLDR .� PB COORDINATION MEMO: ANY COMMERCIAL/SUBDIVISION PROJECTS include: ZBA app, NOD, & BD app S drive ZBA, memos INSPECTION PACKET: NOD, ZBA APPL, SURVEY, BD APPL, ASSESS CARD, CTM, ALL OTHER CORRESPONDENCE SOIL &WATER LTR: PARCELS ON LI SOUND ` COUNTY PLANNING LTR: for parcels located within 500' of RT 25, CR 48 or --bay, sound, or estuary. Enclose ZBA app, decision, survey/map survey/map & NOD UPDATED: NEW ��INFORMATION: l� A 0wLaetd ol -6 2 cam, 9.a -2,cq Q oD ` `CIS' 1 5, .. ,.. .. t / Fi' i �.�j �� '���� - '� � d �. -:-` _ . - t .- .t Y S ., - � �.... "� ' f't ..� � — 4- - _-- ...�- 1.� .. � _ .4.. _ _ -' ; i �• � Jam= �� . r b�l�i�' ��._ d pf _ �� `; � � Vii.- J !-' - 1'�'' - .. .. 'myµ < a.� _ ti r�` � �. •�� '�jntr '`- a * � � at• -; �,,,,�..������t' �` �� .A .;a f SNM� -Ip. �'I���' �� + � ,, �1!'%'�c ...r' �%' �"• x ;�.i�� �* .``�� � �pis ' ����_� Eo-'!SI MARION N ( _IA li.ir-RN 16 ,i }0.1 j(r v s!•�v_- sourHJLD My 0971 VE E i'it Ot,fE` WEAL IS REi ji_iE..:_'s f 1 N6 A SIDE 1ARD LE: I E E-ttw•t• ON YHE WELT TIDE Oi"' it.: HJT 11 FEET . THt':. PRESENT .tE 1 Uit..l• O THE EAST cCAul?uFRJNk3 ' ; ; C Tr !S 2 .4 FFF i .E WOULD 13s = 1 ` : "E ! ! SETBACK BE L4R[ S ED TO ; ^ ! X1n TZC JCL _= G1E = ! �" yE _] DE sa ,T �E ! _A:KCOF 23n 4 F l it I WI I.i !':i_s 14000 !IT s.:t_ll IF-A i 1,. L EW i4nu 1'!-•1 (;ow al-HER i'i!_ItJ•_.;E4 t s ": HIE AWA. ME'! 'RE'C;1 6•a'i E. i UJR i"l..lhtE'r J D EFS m I J ON TO Mf REEOi_iC'.,.i_ i pr'-sr . _ n HC)Rl-' OFFICE OF J j v ZONING BOARD OF APPEA — 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 http://southoldtown.northfork.net (631) 765-1809 fax(631) 765-9064 COVER SHEET FOR TRANSMITTAL ATTN: LLa !�oZO DATE: /2004 SUBJECT: JjaLZAam Xp ' TIV-717 � MESSAGE: tk- Please feel free to call if you did not receive all sheets. Thank you. � 4,LA-t Pages attached: . ITECNOLOGIES ARCHrIECrM PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 13405 MWnRoA Mehta sC New York 11952 631.298.1129 fax.631.298.1128 Transmittal: TO: � y FROM: CC: DATE: 1 ct`O4 RE: —LQ -- 5.2- -Cu I i Ld a22- CuIiLd 2z1 1..�A'1A A-f-,Pq 'lei - `�-►2� '79 _ y- % -Ici _ 4- � &obb5 -'lq - A -�s 2AtvAf3a�1 6-1 -'Z - 40.,2 S-7-2 .o, to P- , 8-1 - 3 Ar 10 e4ta 9 Eo-3 — 24 /L.egaIS from preceding page .Variances under Sections 100- Disapproval, concerning an Department's. July._ 3, 2003•, 30A.1 -and 1'00-231; based on addition proposed at less than 40 Notice`of'Disapproval;,,amend'edt,, the Building Department's feet from the front lot line, at September 23;200 'concerningl LEGAL NOTICE March 10, 2003 Notice of 7705 Bayview Road, Southold; the location of a''garage iri a year SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD' Disapproval, amended May 6, Parcel 79-4-18. other.than.th6'tiirg sear yard; OF APPEALS 2003, for the following reasons: 10-40 AM CATHY at 495=,Maple :Dane, ;0i7eiit THURSDAY,JANUARY 22, (1)a tennis court is not apermit- STANKEWICZ#5458. Request Parcel 17=2-3.1:;, :.;" ; 2004 PUBLIC HEARINGS NOTICE IS OS -ted use on- vacant lot, and (2) for a Variance under Section' 1:40 .PMr;SETH.and=BAS the proposed:,tennis court'f`ence 100-244B, based on the BARA' •=EIGHI�R,; ;�#54:63'x; GIVEN,pursuant to Section 267 will exceed the code,limitations Building Department's July 23, Request'for,id,'_;UariariW iindc df the Town Law and Chapter of four ft.- maximum height 2003 Notice of Disapproval, Section; 1,00=239:4A` `b'__1 :o , 100(Zoning),Code of-the Town �' - � ° ( g)� along or within front yard areas, concerning a proposed addition the. Buildirigv;,RDeppa,rtmerit�. of Southold, the following pub- -six ft. maximum height along at less than 40 feet from the front NovetA6FT, ,200 Notice�Y6fl,� lic hearings will be held by the side and rear yards when a prin- property line, at 1705,Henry's Disapproval;;:_ SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD ci al use is existing). Location Lane Peconic• Parcel 74-1=8. Noveinbe'r.•21}- OQ3 .co cerniu , OF APPEALS at the town Hall p 1 - g of Property: 1015 Youngs 1:00 PM FR. JOHN a swimming'�pool,propose. at 53095 Main Road, P.O. Box Avenue,Orient; CTM 18-1-3. MCGUIRE #5465. Request for less than'1OO,;feet:fromtlie-top;of'< 1179, Southold, New York --10:10., AM JOSEPH a Variance under Sections 100- the ban'k'er";bluff`of-tlie L-ong ; 11971-0959, on Thursday. TRENCHENY #5453. Request 242A'and 100-244, based on Island Sound, -at-11915,Sound `,'; January 22, 2004, at the times for a Variance under Section the Building Department's View Avenue, Southold;,'Parcel-Ii noted below (or as soon there- '100-'244B,,.-based on_ the ' November 17, 2003 Notice 51-1-6.°, .;,,,•, ,.1, - ' after as possible : J� - Building Department's August of Disapproval, amended 150 PM,=MARK.STUbANO_r 9:35 AM JOSEPH GULMI ,25,2003 Notice of Disapproval, November 21, 2003 concerning #5461:--Request;.,fdr''a';Variance and SUSAN BRAVER GULMI concerning additions and alter- additions and alterations pro- under Section'100=2'44`based oii #5340. Request for a Variance ations proposed with a total side posed at less than 15 feet on one the Building;FI'M ep, rfineiit � under Section 100-33, based on yard area at less'than 25 feet, at side and less than 35 feet for October 14 - 200.3' Notice-,;o the Building Department's 120 South Lane, East Marion; both sideards, at 3630 North March 4, 2003 Notice of Disa ovahr; a"?. amende y PA"-'''-` ' ```` '' = =°- °<.F• , Parce137-6-3.2. Sea Drive, Orient; Parcel 15-1- N ve, en:,5t2Q,0,3��coricem�ngr; Disapproval.Applicants propose 10:15 AM SAMUEL and 1. popossed at less tha- '� a swimming pool, accessory ISABELLE DISTASI. #5454. 1:10 PM DOLORES ULL- 35--fee from;tOe,vYearx prop'ert5 " garage and accessory shed in an Request for a Variance under MANN #5464. Request'for a line;,',at' 3505 C qwp _ eel area other.than the required rear Section 100-244B, based on the Variance under Section 100 Road; 1Vlattitucroe1=123: '_ yard, at 250 Pine Tree Court, Building Department's October 244B, based on the Building Cutchogue;Parcel 98-1-7-11. 16,2003 Notice of Disapproval, Department's November 17, ` 2:66-'W,THOM i� ^D :O' F•': 9:40 AM WILBUR OSLER for proposed additions and alter- 2003 Notice of Disapproval, #5467.'.`This'igi est ot`a� #545'1. Request for a Variance ations to the existing single fam- concerning additions/alterations Variance under=Section',; oo=f ' under Section 100-239AB, ily dwelling with a front yard (under construction, BP 24413;`.based' on,-:;the,Buil(t iig� based on the '-Building setback at less than 35 feet, at #290421 issued 2/29/02) at less Departmerit's;Decexriber`'1-,,4Q03- Department's Se tember 30 - P 125 Youngs Avenue; Southold; than 35 feet from the.front lot Notice' - Disapproyal,�aineiid- 2003 Notice of Disapproval, Parcel 61-4-40.. , line, 2445 Minnehaha ed December 3; 2003;concein- t concerning'a porch addition pro- 10:20 AM PATRIZIA ZAN- Boulevard, Southold;'Parcel 87- ing an'ad&tion°progosed_af`Iess posed at less than 75 feet from BONI #5452. Request for a 3-47. than 35-feet frorri,`tht:,fi&ftt1 bt, the bulkhead, at 8070 Peconic Variance under Section 100- 1:20 PM HELEN STRATI- line, at-.415 - Sterling':Place, Bay Boulevard, Laurel; Parcel 244B, based on the Building GOS #5459. Request for a Greenport;Parcel`M-=j-50. 126-11-17. Department's August 22, 2003 Variance under Section 100- 2:10 PM ' RICHARD' 'and 9:50 AM WILLIAM and Notice of Disapproval,amended 244B, based on the Building DOROTHY P-.O.GGI #5468. , CAROL GILLOOLY #5456. August 25, 2003, concerning a Department's October 2, 2003, 'Request fors,a'Vdrianbg ,under- Request for a Reversal of the new single-family dwelling with concerning a second-story addi- Sections;_=10Q.=244A, arid, i;OQ= Building Department's October a front yard setback at less than tion proposed,over the existing 2441based;-on-th -Bilildi-ng t-; 31,2003 Notice of Disapproval, 35 feet,•after demolishing the dwelling,with a single side yard Depariim nt''s•; ,Depeml5e%5;,10;: and/or Variance under Section existing building at 1385 at less than 10 feet,and both side 2003-Notice of.•Disapproval. , 100-30A.4 (ref. 100-33), con- Minnehaha Boulevard, yards at less than 25 feet, at Applicants -,propose a_ can- cerning an as-built detached Southold;Parcel 87-3-23. 1500 Sound Beach Drive, tlleveieii°b; Y w n otu adrlitiori at garage located in a yard other 10.:30 AM REID MAHAFFY Mattituck;Parcel 106=1-33. - the uperportioriaftheexistiitg; than a rear yard, at 605-Village" #5455. Request for a Variance 1:30 PM EDWIN:REEVES dwell•fig whigfiY ril riavd,'`"tvtiaL Lane,Orient;Parcel 25-2-20.21. under Section 100-244B, based #5462. Request fora-Variance, side yaitl;. ea=of.•}es A&* 2�5 10:00 AM MARTHA CAS- on the Building department's under Section 100-30A.4 (ref. .feet, at;al�/40_ i`lage%Lsane; j SIDY #5451. Request for September 5, 2003 Notice of 100-33), based on the Building Orient-,Parcel 24- #S476. #54"76;` DDS';-IESIv '1his'is���te $} Waiver-:of: e ez , r'-a Sec .. pursarlt='lo i tion.. 00 �. �,�. � �.��.,�:: Tc �S�d r Bui v _,v„ _ ?ny the diii Dece ¢ F" e�amom's, Disa lir va. ,> __n=_=• f' ate` Decembers ;.23' erge- an ��� improved`` cue' L P owrr innet'•- Cj 0_. 4,from,Elie applic 'tls:s ft. parcel`:: Location 'of Linnet Stree Po?,ert3' ;8a 9. t, Gi enpot. C T Postal CERTIFIED MAILT,.ZRECEIPT Er (Domestic MaH Only; For delivery information visit our website at -0 Eta�r M OF ?39' L U S E a •-n Postage $ 0.37 NI rq Certified Fee 30 O S c� M ReturnReciept Fee � Postm T �C � Here� O Restricted Delivery Fee ,r C1erI. M r=l (Endorsement Required) ru Total Postage&Fees '-n V2 /0 ru 0 Sent To [- Sre--Apt-N�o.; ----�--4-k- or ---- ------r--v---1- l --------"" PO Box No. PQ--� � City,State,ZIP+4G "-"-'" c GLd-� CSX ii PS Form :0i June 2002 Postal .DCERTIFIED m o (Domestic For delivery ..D information � A L U r, Postage $ 0.37 UNIT pCertified Fee sem! MReturn Reciept Fee ark (Endorsement Required) 1.75 } er� a M Restricted Delivery Fee U KKVS t?• co r"1 (Endorsement Required) ru Total Postage&Fees $ 4.4222M. w ru O Sent To 171- Street Apt.No.; or PO Box No.-__ .. . �'- � n .1 n., City,State , ��- "`.'-- -x'411-----'-_--�_'.................... ZIP+4PS Form 3800,June 2002 See Rev�rse for Instructiors� G r I 2t� Postal rn Er CERTIFIED MAIL,,,,'RECEIPT o (Domestic Or �1 � � EAS �AN0 �N 1�3 � `D Postage $ O..7 UNIT 52 g666-ZS O Certified Fee `.30 MReturn Reclept Fee �+ Postma (Endorsement Requlred) 1.75 9Q2p Here 0 Restricted Delivery Fee ler� w r-1 (Endorsement Required) ° O J fU Total Postage&Fees 4.42 ry 03 r l E3 Sent To aK1 P�__ Jo------- --- o r P Iti Sheet,AptNo.; —� - or PO Boz No. -------------------- ----- ter - ---- .._...N..-•-� -• ----- cny,smre,zIP+a Postal D. CERTIFIED o ■ (Domestic For delivery information visit our website,at LE U . E `D Postage $ 0.37 U ` Y r Certified Fee lS� OReturn Reclept Fee x.30 600e Postmark O (Endorsement Required) 1.75 6t 0 Restricted Delivery Fee rk: KKV rl (Endorsement Required) ru Total Postage&Fees 1$ 4.42 1 VA ru O Sent To -- -__.gid_..} t .Q=._: n___ Street,Apt No.; or PO Box No. ....................1�..._ �x �........_e N.................. crtjs were 1 5 D ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. S' ture item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �n �/ E3 Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X /P7/V`P �;f&4-�121i Lyl E3 Addressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received�' (Printed Name) . Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. Vi 46 1/V I " D. Is delivery address d' 1 13 Yes 1. Article Addressed to: it YES,enter deliv dress below No CV V — ^ �%4 3. Service Type 1&7Certified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑ Registered' ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D.. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Numberi i;i; 7' ZQ Q 410"0 0 01 6'16'4 E410 9 (Transfer from service label) I PS Form 3811,August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-0S-Z-0985 . It .. . . .. . , . , . UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Posta USPSge&Fees Paid Permit No.G-10 Sender: Please print your name, address,and ZIP+4 in this box • �/1t It3t��ttillf11till 111111IM11l11fill AM1111111111111AIII f ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Si lure item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X .494 ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. g, ceived b (Prin C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, / or on the front if space permits. v u 7 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different froitem 17 ❑Yes if YES,enter delivery address Blow: ❑No Oat `I 3. Service Type Certified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label); ; ; , ;, 7 00 2, ,2,4 q 0001. 6169..47.91 . PS Form 3811,August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-03-Z-0985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mad Postage&Fees Paid USPS Permit No G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • ( - I c71Oq!lS� is all it lli i l.i l 111.151111 1 1 11-12 11 It Iit I�HI11 l Is 1411-f 11111111114 is. ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Si ature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X E3Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse ❑Addressee so that we can return the card to you. 6Received by(Printed N e) C. Date o Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, P or on the front if space permits. Z D. Is delivery address different from item 1? Yes 1. Article Addressed to: if YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No 3. Service Type WCertified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7 0 0 2 2 410 0001 616 4 4093 � PS Form 3811,August 2001. . . Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-03-Z-0985 it ii `t 11 i ii li ii ,il i i UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Postage&Fees Paid USPS Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box • cA , ) I q s2 r,1t4101}Itiitd}11119!77�Yi7lYf}iit}If1tt111�11R1 i711l�itp!!ll! =101111:11'COMPLETE TVIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTIOMON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. �� ❑Agent X ■ Print your name and address on the reverse L`_ �=' Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Panted Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: ; D. Is delivery address d&erenLfrrom item 1? ❑Yes if YES,ente' e �Jjbb w: ❑No l,`j Yea—Ac- fl) L�`�•`[. 3. S�er`vaceTyp6', I(Cgrtified Mail ❑Express Mail ❑ Re'gistered- ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mad ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number 7002 2410 0001 6164 4086 (Transfer from service label) PS Form 3811,August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 2ACPRI-03-Z-0985 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail Posta USPSge&Fees Paid Permit No.G-10 • Sender: Please print your name, address,and ZIP+4 in this box • 4c ck tACLA'-'� 2 0 as 1f,f1111111111,111111,1111111,11111Jill ff11i f111f11111f1„1f1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS @ 01 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK --____---------- ----- ----------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT OF (Name of Applicants) MAILINGS CTM Parcel #1000- � COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) residing at t;bs ,; , -cv, New-York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: On the day) of, bex- , 200 1 personally mailed at the United States Post Offic� in Icy ?Svc , New York, by CERTIFIED MAIL., RETURN-•RECEI!PT REQUESTED, ,a true, copy of the attached Legal Notice'in prepaid envelopes addressed to current owners shown on the current assessment roll verified from the.of ficial records on file with the_VAssessors, or ( ) County-Real Property,Office for every property which abuts and is across a public or private street, or vehicular right-of- way of record, surrounding the applicant's property. (Signature) Sworn to before me this day of Pee_ , 2003 MELANE V.BROM N*jy PAk Stab d Nor York ,.r� W.40712 Maw In 8u4*cow r (Notary Public) OommWN Oct.19,X0005 PLEASE list, on the back of this Affidavit or on a sheet of paper, the lot numbers next to the owner names and addresses for which notices were mailed. Thank you. a _A A —fro 1020 •- a ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS P* -TOWN OF SOUTHOLD:NEW YORK —---------------X In the Matter of the Application of AFFIDAVIT �c�S��n OF SIGN (Name of Applicant) POSTING Regarding Posting of Sign upon Applicant's Land Identified as 1000- _ x COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) I, residing at Sys +'wc-�- , New York, being duly sworn, depose and say that: << :On the 9701 day of uo-rLi , 2004, 1 personally placed the Town's official.Poster,with the date of hearing and nature of my application. noted thereon, securely upon my property, located ten(10)feet or closer from the street or right-of-way(driveway entrance)-facing the street or facing each street or right-of-way entrance;*and that hereby confirm that the Poster has remained in place for seven days prior to the date of the subject hearing date w4ich hear.'ng date was shown to be L [� (Signature S to before m�eatthis Tday of-" U 200-q. - - n _, BONNIEJ.DOROSy KI 1 , Notary Public,State Of New York 95328,Suffolk County (No ry Public) Term Expires July 1,20 O4 *near the entrance or.driveway entrance of my property, as the area most visible to passersby. OFFICE OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1809 Fax (631) 765-9064 December 22, 2003 Re: Chapter 58 — Public Notice for Thursday, January 22, 2004 Hearing(s) Dear Sir or Madam: Please find enclosed a copy of the Legal Notice describing your recent application. The Notice will be published in the next issue of the Long Island Traveler-Watchman newspaper. 1) By January 5th: Please send the enclosed Legal Notice, with both a cover letter including a contact person and telephone number, and a copy of your survey filed with this application which shows the new construction area, CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, to all owners of land (vacant or improved) surrounding yours, including land across any street, railroad tracks, or right-of-way that borders your property (please see revised Town Code Ch. 58 enclosed). Use the current addresses shown on the assessment rolls maintained by the Town Assessors' Office located at Southold Town Hall (765-1937) and the County Real Property Office at the County Center, Riverhead. If you know of another address for a neighbor, you may want to send the notice to that address as well. If any letter is returned to you undeliverable, you are requested to make other attempts to obtain a mailing address or to deliver the letter to the current owner, to the best of your ability and to confirm this in either a written statement, or at the hearing, with the returned letter. Please either mail or deliver to our office your Affidavit of Mailing (form enclosed) with parcel numbers, name and addresses noted, and return it with the white receipts postmarked by the Post Office. (Also, when the green signature cards are returned to you by the Post Office, please mail or deliver them to us as soon as possible before the scheduled hearing.) If any signature card is not returned, please advise the Board at the hearing and return it when available. These will be kept in the permanent record as proof of all Notices. 2) By January 12th: Please make arrangements to place the enclosed poster on a sign board such as plywood or similar material, posting it at your property for at least seven (7) days; the sign should remain up until the day of the hearing. Securely place the sign on your property facing the street, no more than 10 feet from the front property line bordering the street. (If you border more than one street or roadway, an extra sign is available for the additional front yard.) The hearing will be delayed 2 months if your property is not posted properly. Please also deliver your Affidavit of Posting to our office on the day of the hearing. If you do not meet the deadlines stated in this letter, please contact us promptly. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Enclosures Zoning Appeals Board and Staff NuTl � I uim HEARI ,40 A public hearing will be held by the Southold Town Appeals Board at Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold , concerning this property: NAME : TRENCHENY, JOSEPH 5453 MAP # :0 37-6-3 . 2 APPEAL: SETBACK PROJECT: ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS DATE : THURS . JANUARY 22 7 0 : 70 AM If you are interested in this project, you may review the file(s) prior to the hearing during normal business days between the hours of Sam and Spm . ZONING BOARD - TOWN OF SOUTHOLD - 765-1809 APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS �o�Og�FF�(K�oG Southold Town Hall Gerard R'Goehringer,Chairman c 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen,Jr. ti z P.O.Box 1179 James 15inizio,Jr, Southold,' outhold,New York 11971 Robert A Villa O� Fax(516)765-1823 Lydia A.Tortora Ol * � -lblephone-(516)765-1809 BOARD OV APPEALS TOWQBSSOACTION OpRDFAPPEALS DAVE OF ACTION: March,l, 1995 APPL. #4301_ APPLICANT: EDWARD A. and VIRGINIA THORP LOCATION OF'PROPERTY: 80 .South Lane, East Marion, NY C0b-NTY TAX:WSTRICT 1000, SECT. 37, BLOCK 6, LOTS 3.1 & 2.1. BASIS. OF APPEAL Notice.of Disapproval issued by the Building Inspector on January 3, 1995. ' oposed 'alterations of premises (lot -line change) lots will not;conform to yequiieements of Bulk & Parking Schedule." PROVISIONS APPEALED FROM: Article IIIA,,_ Section 100-30A.3. RELIEF REQUESTED: 1., Reduction of lot width for westerly'parcel (now 3.1) from 47.44 feet to 17.44 feet; 2. Reduction in area by 2625 sq. ft., which total reduetiori is from appro dmately 16,650 sq. ft. to 14,025 sq. ft. of lot 3_1 (westerly parcel-p1so referred to as Lot 4 on- the Map of Gardiners Bay Estates). MOTION MADE,BY: James Dinizio, Jr., Member SECONDED BY: Robert A. Villa, Member ACTION/RESOLUTION ADOPTED: Granted 1. Lot width reduction for westerly parcel, now 3.1, to 17.44 w1do for a depth of approximately 80 feet, increasing lot-•width 'of easterly parcel, now 2.1, from 28:46 to 58+- feet; and 2. Lot area-size reduction of-not more than 2625 sq. ft. from the westerly lot 3 1, to increase , the Ilot area-aize oY the easterly lot, 2.1, with the following CONDITIONThere be no reduction of building setback or future addidono on the easterly lot B, now 2.1, that would restrict access to the back yard, and maintaunng sufficient 10 ft. wide opening in yard area at the southwest corner of the hawse to the closest property line for access by emergency-fire trucks REASONS/FINDINGS: Smaller lot to the east (2.1 or "B") will be increased in size which lessens the nonconforming lot area. Substantially increases westerly side.yard of existing house on Lot B, {also referred to as Lot 3 on the Map of ; Gardiners Bay Estates.} Owner has confirmed there will not be a relocation of the house'on Lot B near the top of bank at Gardiners'Bay. No adverse affect will -be created on the westerly lot and remaining yard areas are sufficient to allow for future construction. VOTE OF THE BOARD: Ayes: Serge J. Doyen., Member James Dinizio, Jr., Member Robert A- Villa, Member Lydia A. Tortora, Member Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman-Member This resolution was unanimously adopted. -� lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIRMAN, r� tJ c 09 03 03: 09p Dr. Notaro 6312981128 p. 1 OCC. 5 N0. 836 P. 1 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971-0959 (631) 765-1609 (631) 765-9064 FAX Email: Linda.Kowalsk!MTown.Southold.ny� Jessica.SOaerO Town.Southold.nv.us bgp.-I/southoldtown.northfork.net TO: ARCHITECNOLOGIES FAX#: 298-1128 DATE: 12-8-03 PAGES: 0 to follow APPL OF: TRECHENY, 10:10 AM ZANBONI, 10:20 AM MAHAFFY, 10:30 AM HEARING: Thursday,January 22,2004 TIME: RE: Please let us know ifYn a available at the above date and time for a ZBA Public Heating in the big rnim located at Southold Town Hall. Thank you. YES NO ZBA temporary fax#765-1823 SITE I f SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT EAST MARION All", � TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y . J � 02� o� 1000 - 37 - 06 - 3. 2 SCALE.- 1 99 = 30 FEB. 26 2003 s G C2, c� �� NOTE: LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO s `44/• MAP OF SECTION 2 OF GARDINER'S BAY ESTATES " FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE ON SEPT. 23, 1927 O4j0� ` �j/ •./ �1/ AS MAP NO. 275. �• R��F� �o�02 �p AREA = 13,056 SO. FT. TO TIE LINE FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM 36103COl77 G 5/4/98 o • -J 6 INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY MR.JOHN T. METZGER \ LAND SURVEYOR DATED FEB. 26, 2003. OCT. 23, 2002 (TOPO. & B.O.H.) / 10 /N zsz �, 3 z, Z , CL ° �, S 2 o0 o O O L 0 2 N Cc 4 - _ Q Q ° o .� W co 60 W c1r) I -,o (T) Lr) 0 � 00 cC�' �,— /V c/) Z ui ti"AR 1'6 2004 F v,.o rr±,. .. sa 5•�.,- -.,,..._.r. .,...°:.'.- "V'%jam.: DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: DWG. NAME: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN 8.19.03 ISSUED TO BLDG. DEPT. FOR REVIEW. % OLOGIES SITEPROPOSED TR E N C H E NY ALTERATION A.S ITE TR_.8.03 X 2.19.04 RE-ISSUED TO BLDG. DEPT. FOR REVIEW. / �j// ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 8.8.03 SCALE: 2.23.04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. EAST MARION NEW YORK / �j' � 13405 Main Road,Mattituck, New York 11952 111 = 20' - / 631.298.1129 fax: 631.298.1128 3.16.04 R ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. SITE SURVEY SURVEY OF PROPERTY SITUATED AT EAST MARION v TOWN OF SOUTHOLD o a ,. �• oG SUFFOLK ��� N �� COUNTY N . Y . n m o2G' o� 1000 — 37 — 06 — LL } LLJ I C//1( �5 SCALE: 1 = 30 S y � >� ; ��� O'L'D. 26, 2003 CY NOTE: LOT NUMBERS ARE REFERENCED TO ,4�1 MAP OF SECTION 2 OF GARDINER'S BAY ESTATES FILED IN THE SUFFOLK COUNTY �, bs ��w w ' j ---- -- Q CLERK'S OFFICE ON SEPT. 23, 1927 Q �0QQ v �� J N AS MAP NO. 275. CO Q• Rl�FL AREA = 13,056 SQ. FT. TO TIE LINE FLOOD ZONES FROM FIRM 36103CO177 G 5/4/98 p �� J � INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY PREPARED BY MR.JOHN T. METZGER LAND SURVEYOR DATED FEB. 26, 2003. oto V! �w OCT. 23, 2002 (TOPO. & B.O.H.) G p ♦ 0 Ar W Z i1 _ CL z 2 w O 2 O fii �\ 0 �W _ z O Co 00 � - COco L; 00 coo O �- z w V "ml 11111 DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: DWG. NAME: [2.19.04 D: DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN ISSUED TO BLDG. DEPT. FOR REVIEW. TRSITEEX PROPOSED T R E N C H E N Y A LT E R AT I D N TT OLOGIES1 A. SITE _ _ SCALE: RE-ISSUED TO BLDG. DEPT. FOR REVIEW. 8 803 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SEaRiaaVaiIi aCEaioS I�SUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. EAST MARION NEW YORK 1 " - 20' 13405 Main Road,Mattituck, NewYork 11952 oi �// �/ 631.298.1129 fax: 631.298.1128 i a . i IT, � �� � �Iu I I I (01v I Ilii I N ---------I I I N I I I I I I 001 J I I r i I I �! O IF I SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN y4 , a4 DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: SCALE: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: TR_ICP&2CP EX 1/411=11011 10/7/03 ISSUED TO ZONING BOARD FOR REVIE S 03.20.03 L U G 1 E A. EX2/23/04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. PROPOSED ALTERATION TO EX. TR E N C H E NY RESIDENCE DWG' NAME: f � �������D ARCHITECTURE EAST MARION PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES EXISTINGNEW YORK ( j�i / /' /j 13405 Main Road,Mattituck, New York 11952 FLOOR PLANS 631.298.1129 fax: 631.298.1128 TR_ZNNING_CUP_10 6 03 dwp 10-6-03 1:43:39 pry ECT W Q —I �/ 000 / UTILITY RM. / 4'-0"X 6-5" j LAUNDRY ROOM 0 6'-s'X$'-4" ITCHEN i / \ I s x 1 0 i bo - GREAT ROOI`l / II I 15'_4"X 21'_0" T R (� L / T-1O � 9_6 II DINING ROOM i / 11'-2"X 11'-1 O" tit /Z// FOYER ', I I - - - - - - - - - - / M. BEDROOM 7'-5"X 7'-9" 13'-7"X 14'-2" H II �� BEDROOM BEDROOM I - � BATHRO16-6"X17-2"OM I (I GARAGE 151-Y'X 19'-6" I / ~—ry i BEDROOM - 15'-2"X 16'-6' O/ %/ /'// /// / / % / / i� / .oFfl W 6 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECO � D FLOC-)IR PLAN TOTAL AREA = 1 ,440 SO.FT. TOTAL AREA NEW ADDITION = 650 SOFT. TOTAL AREA = i ,i 00 SO.FT. TOTAL AREA NEW ADDITION = 594 SOFT. DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: SCALE: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: ITR—ICP&2CP—CU 1/411=11011 i/, ,..� nT nCTT E 10/7/03 ISSUED TO ZONING BOARD FOR REVIE j//�.:�%%�• -j�j,��� ,i, j. j,� v • v �1 v v i i✓ cs 03.20.03 A, 1 - 1 2/23/04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. PROPOSED ALTERATION TO EX. T R E N C H E N Y RESIDENCE ! %//////%�//��//D/���/%� ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ////////////////////D DWG. NAME: /� ��/ ��/%%���%%�% `"rI�'T�CTURE PLAN. DTG Cr"�TSTRUCTION SERVICES ! ! PROPOSED EAST MARION NEW YORK j 134051 Main Road,Mattituck, New York 11952 SERVICES ! ! FLOOR PLANS ! ������������/ 631.298.1129 fax: 631.298.1128 `r I I I I m 11 X .-L 1 f^ _ 1 FRONT ELEVATION R EAR ELEVATION 1 I I I o D LEFT SIDE ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: SCALE: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: TR ELEV EX 1/4"=1'0" - 2 - 10/7/03 ISSUED TO ZONING BOARD FOR REVIE O3O 03 OLOGIES "�/%/////(//.9//////.`ddY%a"/f,BY/;b/6.6'/,OH////////////////.0///////�%JJJJ/!JJ//H/////H/J///H/////////J///J!J/J///J/JHH/J/H////////////////!J/////H/J////J///////////HH/H////J/////H//J//!///////////.%////H////.%%//,/H////•%/.;%//////H/////////,i///////////////H//, [A. EX 2/23/04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. PROPOSED ALTERATION TO EX. TR E N C H E NY RESIDENCEPLANNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DWG. NAME: ,j%�% ,j%%yj9%�%%%%//A//////%j� EXISTING EAST MARION NEW YORK �/�%%�����//%���//��J�/����������/y//��//y%�///, � 13405 Main Road Mattituck New York 11952 /::/�;%i/%�/;/iii/oi.6iz�uli�z/r„c%'/n. �z > r ELEVATIONS ,,,;,,,,,,,;;,,,,,;i,,,,,Y ;; 631.298.1129 fax: 631.298.1128 I - ( _ZDUif'JG__CU1\ 10 U 0U clWQ 10 I__) 03 1:-4U:39 pri C 6-10"„ ❑ El — + N �6 I = I i SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ------ --- -- L 11111 i — — - — - - - -- fi - — E _ � — NORTHEAST ELEVATION O N O IW ST ELEVATION DWG. NO.: FILE NAME: SCALE: ISSUED: DESCRIPTION: TR_ELEV_CUR 1/4"-110" 03.20.03 10/7/03 ISSUED TO ZONING BOARD FOR REVIE - ji:ri%i:,'/.%'i A. 2 -PROPOSED E D ALTER %�� Jam % f� �;,; OLOGIES 2/23/04 RE-ISSUED TO THE Z.B.A. FOR REVIEW. PR P ATION TO EX TREN H ���"" ��""'���"""�����"""� =�///J,/�JJJJH/ . C ENY RESIDENCE DEN E ,a a, �,, �,/ /,.,,,,,�L..... ........ .:N/H////L�/ILf!!!=%JL/,L:!%��/fC/%!!! DWG. NAME: C �i9s�io�o��ii/r�'°�i�i���a��,s�,y�ih� EAST MARION -- -- - CHITECTURE PLANNING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROPOSED NEW YORK �"" '"'''" "'/'��' "y�" "'� /ii;//ii�jii�ii/i/ aii/iii//�,bi/i 1i ELEVATIONS �� 13405 Main Road,Mattituck, New York 11952 o ,;, �� ���� y"�/,%:%:�•,/%/�" %,���/%= </•%/ 631 298.1129 fax: 631 298.1128