Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLL-3NEW YORK STATE HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM For Office Use Only--Site Identifier Project Identifier Linda L. Harvey Your Name Town of Southold/SPLIA Address Town Hall; Main Road Southol~ L.I?, ~Y. 11971 Zip Organization Date' Fall 1985 Phone (51~ 765-1892 (if any) Town Community Develop,ment Office 1. Site Identifier(s) 2. County Suffolk Reeve/Cain House - Selah B. Reeve House One of following: City Township ~ou%h01d Incorporated Village Unincorporated Village or Hamlet Laurel 3. Present Owner Victoria De Address e Site Description (check all appropriate categories): Structure/site Superstructure: complete__partial collapsed not evident X Foundation: above below '(ground level) hot evident X--- Structural subdivisions a-~parent ___Only surface traces %~sible Buried Eraces detected ~-~st construction materials (be as specific as possible): Grounds X Under cultivation Sustaining erosion Woodland Never cultivated Pr---eviously cultivated __--Floodplain Soil Drainage: excel'lent X good fair poor Slope: flat X gentle moderate -~teep__ -- Distance to ~arest w~-6er from structure (approx.) N/A Elevation: __Upland Pastureland Site Investigation Surface--date(s) Site Map (Submit with form*) ---Collection Subsurface--date(s) Testing: shovel coring other no. of units (append additional sheets, if necessary): Excavation: unit size (Submit plan o---~-~its with form*) * Submission should be 8½"xll", if feasible Investigator Linda L, Harvey Manuscript or published report(s) (reference fully): (Submit plan of units with no. of units unit size form*) Present repository of materials ~0ne known LL'3 t Page 2 Site inventory: a~ date constructed or occupation period early 19th century b. previous owners, if known Reeve & Van Wyck c. modifications, if known ' (append additional sheets, if necessary) Site documentation (append.additional sheets, if necessary): a. Historic map references 1) Name Date Source Present location of original, if known 2) Name Date Source Present location of original, if known Representation in existing photography 1) Photo date Where located 2) Photo date Where located c. Primary and secondary source documentation (reference fully) The White Pine Series of Architectural Monographst Vol. V, No. page 7.; Vol. VIII, No. 6, pp. 15 & 16. d. Persons with memory of site: l) Name Address 2) Name Address 8. List of material remains other than those used in construction (be as specific as possible in identifying object and material): If prehistoric materials are evident, check here and fill out prehistoric site form. 9. Map References: Map or maps showing exact location and extent of site must accompany this form and must be identified by source and date. Keep this submission to 8½"xll", if feasible. USGS 7% Minute Series Quad. Name NYS DOT MATTITUCK QUAD For Office Use Only--UTM Coordinates 10. Photography (optional for environmental impact survey): Please submit a 5"x7" black and white print(s) showing the current state of the site. Provide a label for the print(s) on a separate sheet. SI£'I'I'LEMI2NIS 'ON TIlE I:ASI EKN [!ND OF I_ONG ISL-\. D HOUSE NJ!AR P..\TCIIOGL []. I C)NG ISL \~--1) Ii~;/S[~ \T [.,\LH(II I()NG ISI .\:<.[) . '~hite Pine Series~ Vol V, 1.:o. 2, 1919. LL:5 MA~,DALINE GOODPdCH Town Hfstorian 683 Bayshore Road Greenport, New York 11944 October ~ 1980 (516) 477-2090 Barbara Van Liew Eaitor, Preservation Notes 93 ~;orth Country Road oetauket, New York, 11733 Dear bis. Vun Liew: In answer to your that may help. letter of October 3~ 19~0~ I have some information According to the records in the Assessors Office~ this house in Laurel was on the bo,mndary of Southold and Riverhead Towns. It was located east of the Laurel Post Office on the north side of the Main Road. In 1975 the house an~ ~ences burned ~ leaving only the old barns. On January 5~ 1976 the house'was demolished but the barns still remain. This property is owned by Victoria M. DeSalle. I ho~e that this information will be of some help to you. At least you will not be trying to locate it as it has ceased to exist. Sincerely . (Mrs) Magdaline"Mitzi" Goodrich $outhold Town Historian 7]ff4WHIT PINE, ,S I LS A CHITECTURAL MONOGRAPHS A BI-MONTLY PUBLICATiON,SUGGESTING Tf, AP42Hl%CTURAL USLS O' WHITE, HNE AVAILABILITY TODAYA$ A.S'TRUC'IIJIL W(3DD Lt.-3 i Vol. VIII DECEMBER, t922 No. 6 FENCES AND FENCE POSTS OF COLONIAL TIMES By ALFRED HOPKINS While bractisi.g a~ ,In arclntect In New York lot many year~, Htr, ttopbins ha~ dts~ned public buildings, banks and country homes, and bas taken time to make a particular study a/aericultural work. He bat aebiewd muck success tcitb bis farm buildlngs, for be bas given them a proper archl'leddral ckaracter. His book on 'Farm Bul'ldingF ami bis writings on this and other sub/cots are well knou,n.--Rm*o*'~ Now WrHEN Mr. Whitehead asked me tn write an article on old picket fences for the very interesting arid instructive IFhile Pine Series of .4rchiteclural Afonographs, I ac- cepted the task wit~ alacrity, because ~t gave me an npportunity of ,,enting in public print a view which [ have frequently had to repress in private, that of all the various problems submitted b_v the layman to the architect for his suggestion, the subject of the fence, as it is generally presented, is the most inane and uninteresting. Every architect, I take it, can recall the incident of the smiling and vain-glorious purchaser of a piece of country real es- tate b~:eezing into hisoffice, and,with a self-sufficient air, saying that he has secured a wonder- ful site, that he wants to do the perfect piece of architecture, some day,--but not now--and that he is very anxious to discuss iust what typeof fenceought to be put up in the interim. It is then that I wish breezy people would not think about fen ces, and would cupy my mind with thoughts which better please my fancy. But, in looking over the Editor's delightful cnllection of photographs of Early American fences and fence posts, man5' of which have been selected to illustrate this article, it is very easy to be led into a discussion of them, and a first impulse is to incline one to the opinion that all the possible fnrms fnr the American fence have been devised, and that it is only the province nf the present-day architect to make a judicious se- lection; this certainly is the view evidenced bv the most casual student of furnitnre design. do not have time in our hurried life to take palnswitfl the little things, and that is the pti cipal reason why so much of our mod- eFn architecture is crude and ill<on- sidered. There is perhaps not so much to learn from Europ- ean countries with respect to fence design as there is from our own Col- onial period,which was rich in tbls particular, Eng- land has given us excellent examples 16' THE WHITE PINE SERIES OF ARCHITECTURAL MONOGRAPHS entire economic historyof American agriculture in the feat'es that surr, mnd lhe American farp~ tory of American architecture in thc F'cnce Pusts of Colonial times. For is it not true that such primitive and economical fences as that in the holl,fe,.~,_l,~u, rel, Lonff Island are quite as typical of the gene~ ~d~sg Of~hod~~ck woods fa~er as are the splendidly designed gate posts of the Oliver House in Salem, a typical example of what the conscientious architect would wish to produce, even under the most un- satishctory conditions, and which fortunately he can produce on those happy occas OhS when the r/~bl ,~npdili,m~ r~re~ent hemst: ?e~ ~ ple~ ~hown in this issue of the Monugka~h Sdl~a~, and that is the happy faculty possessed by the Colonial architect of breaking up the monotony of his work by a few well chosen spots of orna- ment. The illustrations show us, too, how the Colonial architect heeded the admonition of an early writer on architecture who in the middle of the 17th century expressed the warning to his readers, "to use, and still be sparing of antik ornaments." " t " -~ ., ~ ~ 'd~ ~:'",'~'..; ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~t . ~- ~.-~.. . :. '.._ '?, .: :*' . . , · ENTRANCE GATEWAY The Admiral Cowle~