Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZBA-04/11/1968 APPEAL BOARD MEMBERS Robert ~/. Gillispie, Jr., Ch~irm~n Robert Bergen Charles Grcgonis, Jr. Serge Doyen, Jr. Fred Hu[s¢, Jr. Southold Town Board of Appeals SOUTHOLD, L. I., N. ¥. T¢l~l~hon¢ SO 5-2660 MINUTES SODTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS April 11, 1968 A regular meeting of the Southold Town Board of Appeals was held at 7:30 P.M., Thursday, April 11, 1968, at the Town Office, Ma~n Road, Southold, New York. There were present: Messrs: Robert W. Gillispie, Jr.s Chairman; Robert Bergen, Fred Hulse, Jr., Charles Grigonis, 3r., Serge Doyen~ Jr. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1170 - 7:30 P.M.(E.S.T.), Upon application of Charles M. Krull, King Street, Orient, New York, for recognition of access in accordance with the State of New York Town Law, Section 280A, Location of property: right of way south side King Street~ Orient, New York, bounded north by I~ng Street, east by James Douglass, south by James Douglass, west by Or~ nt Harbor. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for recognition of access, legal notice of hea~g, affidavit attestning to its publication in the official newspapers ~nd notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -2- A~pril 11, 1968 THE CHAIRbt~N: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? FLOYD F. I~NG, JR.: I am here ~or this hearing and on behalf of Mr. Krull. I can see no other way of gaining access to the property. As pointed out in the application there is a 16 foot right of way ~nd it has been extended through part of the property to Mr. I~ullj but not far enough for the last lot. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Krull owns how many lots? MR. KING: Three lots. MR. BERGEN: Actually this right of way is on his own property MR. KING: It is on~s own property, right. THE CHAIRMAN: Didnft we give him division of this property a few years ago? MR. KING: There is a map on file. I believe the same date as the date of that survey. THE CHAIRMAN: The survey in this file is dated May~ 1959. MR. KING: The lots have been approved in area and frontage~ but this last one doesnft have access. THE CHAIRMAN: He can use lot number two. ~. KING: The right of way is extended up to this point, so that he has access up to his house. THE CHAIRMAN: Now he wants to sell lot number one? MR. KING: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: Does he want to sell lot number two also? bR. KING: That is still for sale. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak for this application? (There was no responee) THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? Southold Town Board of Appeals -3- April 11, 1968 ROBERT J. DOUGLASS: The land which bounds this property is owned by my dad and myself~ and my main interest is in the~y this may affect the future character of the area. These two lots that Mr. King is talking about, one is 12,000 some square feet and the other is 13,000 some square feet, which is half washed away. I have pictures here. Our feeling is that there is not enough space to have two lots and 9ive access through there to sell two individual house lots. It would be setting a precedent for the entire area we own. I know you fellows like to have 20,000 square feet. THE CHAIRgL~N: The zoning minimum is 12,500 square feet of area. The Board of Health requires 20,000 square feet. However~ this division of property preceeds even the Board~ Health requirements~ and at the time this division was made the zonln9 requirement was, and still is~ 12,500 square feet. MR. DOUGLASS: Provided there is no chan9e. Here you have everyone goin9 in and out of a 16 foot right of way. (Mr.Douglass showed photographs of the property in question to the Board.) If this property goes down to the bayfront, I understand it will be bulkheaded and filled. THE CHAIRMAN: Did you sell this property to these people in the first place? DOUGLASS: No, I did not. THE CHAIRMAN: Who did? ~R. DOUGLASS: Latham sold that property. (Mr. Douglass preeented survey of property, sho~hg his property). We intend to have three big lots back here. This will cut it all down so that you have small lots and depreciate the value and set a precedent. If he went ahead with one lot then we wouldntt have any feeling against it. It would be one half acre and we could have one half acre here. Itts too bad that Mr. Krull dldn~t come to us before he went ahead with this. We could have 9one through with a strai9ht new right of way. This is why I am down here tonight. If you cut this down it is ~n9 to set a precedent for the whole thing. THE CHAIRMAN: The property has already been divided. We can not deny him the use of the lots that we granted in 1959. MR. DOUGLASS: If he only has ri9ht of way to one. THE CHAIRMAN: We can't force him to turn two lots into one. One lot is 12,670 square feet, and the other is 13,269 square feet. (The Board and Mr. Douglass discussed the possible division of Mr. Douglass~ property.) Southold Town Board of Appeals -4- April 11, 1968 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds the applicant requests the approval of a 16 foot right of way. Said right of way runs approximately 183 feet in a southerly direction. The right of way is to obtain access to property which was granted division by the Board of Appeals in 1959. The right of way will serve two lots. The right of way shall be suitable for the ingress and egress of all emergency vehicles. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hard- ship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties aAike in the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the character of T-he district. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED Charles M. Krull, t~ng Street, Orient, New York, be GRANTED recognition of access as applied for on prq~rty located on a right of way south side King Street, Orient, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie~ Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Grigonis, Mr. Doyen. PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No, 1173 - 7:45 P.M.(E.S.T.), Upon application of Donald E. & Lorna B. Tuthill, 3020 Boisseau Avenue, Southold~ New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 300, Subsection 9, For per- mission to erect a subdivision identification sigh. Location of property: east side Boisseau Avenue, Southold, New York, bounded north by land of Tuthill, east by Laurel Avenue, mouth by Sengelaub, west by Boisseau Avenue. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special exception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. Southold Town Board of Appeals -5 April 11~ 1968 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: This application is in accordance with what we discussed with him when he came in informally. Is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to erect two subdivision identificatiun signs with insufficient setback. The signs will be located on Bolsseau Avenue at the entrance to the subdivision to be known as '~ennecott Park". Both signs will be 10 feet x 2% feet~ natural wood with white lettering, mounted on a split rail fence. Said signs will be located at least five feet from any property line. The Board finds that the public convenience and welfare and justice will be served and the legally established or permitted use of neighborhood property and adjoining use districts will not be permanently or substantially injured and the spirit of the Ordinance will be observed. On motion by ~. Grigonis, seconded by F~. Hulse, it was RESOLVED Donald E. & LOrna E. Tuthill, 3020 Boisseau Avenue~ Southold, New York, be granted permission to erect subdivision ident~flcation signs with insufficient setback as applied for. Location of property: east side Bolsseau Avenue, Southold, New York. Said permission is granted subject to the following cond~ions: 1. The signs shall be located at least five feet from any property llne. The signs shall be granted for a period of one year~ renewable annually upon written letter to the Board of Appeals. 3. The signs shall be subject to all subsequent changes in the Southold Town B~i~ding Zone Ordinance as it applies to the signs. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grlgonis~ Mr. Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -6- April 11, 1968 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1174 - 8:00 P.M.(E.S.T.), Upon application of Angelo & George~te Petrucci, Bay Avenue~ Cutchogue, New York, for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Art~le III, Section 303, for permission to set off a lot with less than 100 feet frontage. Location of property: north side Still- water Argue, Cutchogue, New York, part of lot number 80 as sho%vn on the subdivision map of M.S. Hand, Section II, Suffolk County Map No. 1280. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a variance, legal notice of hea~ng, ~ffidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to~e applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone present who wishes to speak for this application? STEPHEN GRIFFING, ESQ.: The basic argument is that the right of way, even though owned by another person, could never be built on. Even though Angelo and Georgette Petrucci own the property they do not have the benefit of it at all times. Having sold lots number five and six, its pretty hard to get four lots out of the remaining property, and they have overcome some expense in having the map laid out. THE CHAIRMAN: k~at is the area of lot number one? Which is the lot we are referring to? MR. GRIFFING= (Mr. GrJ-ffing pointed out the lot in question on the map~ being lot referred to as lot number 1). The lot is 70 feet by mn average depth of 260 feet. THE CHAIR~qAN: The total area that we are talking about includes the right of way? MR. GRIFFING: No sir. We don't own the right of way. The lot is 20~000 square feet, I am sure. THE CHAI.RMAN: There is plenty of area. MR. PETRUCCI: It is 150 feet wide on the water edge. MR. GRIFFING: I do have the deeds here. Plot A isntt referred to in [~. Petrucci's deed. THE CHAI~,~kN: This is before you discovered the right of way? MR. GRIFFING: That was before we discovered THE CHAIRSIAN: You never received a bill for it? $outhold Town Board of Appeals -7- April 11, 1968 GEORGETTE PETRUCCI: We have been paying taxes since 1964 on Plot A. We thought it was part of our deed. They just called us from the County a few weeks ago. MR. GRIFFING: The first ~11 that came through had no indication of arrears on it. blR. PETRUCCI: We had it payed all the way through. MR. GRIFFING: They thought it was included in one bill. THE CHAIPJ~N: I think we under~tand the situation. Is there anyone present who ~ishes to speak against this application? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Are there any other questions? ~There was no response.) After investigation and inspection the Board finds that the applicant requests permission to set off a lot with less than 100 feet frontage. The lot in question adjoins a right of way which the applicants thought they owned and had full use of. It was later discovered this was not sot therefore~ the lot in question has only 70 feet frontage. The Board finds there is ample depth and area in this lot to meet all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. In general, the Board is in agremment with the reasoning of the applicant as presented in the application. The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance will produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hard- ship created is unique and would not be shared by all properties alike in the immediate vicinity of this propeXty and~ the same use district; and the variance does observe the spirit of the Ordinance and will not change the charac*er of the district. On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Bergen, it was RESOLVED Angelo & Georgette Petrucci, Bay Avenue, Cutchogue, New York, be granted permission to set off a lot with less than 100 feet front age as applied for. LOcation of property: north side Stillwater Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- 5~. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grigods, Mr. Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -8- Ap*~l 11, 1968 PUBLIC HEARING: Appeal No. 1175 - 8:15 P.M.(E.S.T.), Upon application of Irving C. Latham, 41995 Main Road, Orient, New York, for a special exception in accordance with the Zoning Ordi~nce, Article V, Section 500, Subsection 8 and 35,for perm/ssion to re-activate a transit mix cement plant on property located on private right of way, East Marion, New York, bounded north by C.C. Cook, east by Irving Latham, south by C.C. Cook, west by Robert Long. Fee paid $5.00. The Chairman opened the hearing by reading the application for a special ezception, legal notice of hearing, affidavit attesting to its publication in the official newspaper, and notice to the applicant. THE CHAIRMAN: Is the~e anyone present who wishes to speak in favor of this application? STANLEY S. CORWIN~ ESQ.: My name is Stanley Corwin, and I am here on behalf of the application. I would like to say preliminarily that we are here by way of exhaustin9 administrative remedies. We feel that the order ~f the application by the Building Inspector was an error on his part, and as a matter of fact, no special exception is required since the operation contemplated is not one that requires a special exception and is one that could be conducted in an area that is Industrial zoned. The requirement in the Zoning Ordinance is to the manufacture of cement, and that is not an operation that is contemplated here. However, if the Building Inspectorts inter- pretation of the Ordinance is correct and a special exception is required, we submit it should be granted because of the conditions that are provided for the 9ranting of a special exception will all be complied with. The operation is not one that will affect property values in the area or adjoining districts. The health, safety~ wel- fare, and morales of the Town will not be adversely affected. The operation is the only one of it's kind if its to be instituted in the Town of Sou~hold, and an operation that is needed in the Town. Other than that, I have nothing at this time. I would like to~eser~e the right to make some remarks later on. THE CHAIRMAN: How would you think the Ordinance should have been drawn to cover the contiguity that you noted? STANLEY S. CORWIN, ESQ.: I don't think it should have been drawn to cover any contiguity. It should 9ire permission in an Industrial Zone. If the Board intends as a matter of policy to require special exceptions, they should describe it for what it is. There is nothing in there for the manufacture of sand and gravel for transportation to another THE CHAIRSL~N: You don't call that m~ufacturin9? Southold Town Board of Appeals -10- April ll, 1968 STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: In connection with that, before you hear in opposition, I should like to point out a new right of way has been obtained. The access that Mr. King had re~erred to is no longer the only access that can be transported over. THE CHAI~WukN: Mr. King pointed out that the access that has been used was not the only access. He pointed out that Mr. Latham had access over the Schaefer property~ connecting with his p~operty. At this time is there anyone present who wishes to speak against this application? ROBERT LONG: I made exception to what Mr, Corwin says to the value of property. It would devaluate my property. That, plus the ~idth of that right Of way~ I don't see how you are going to get ~rucks of that nature down that right of way without tearing up private property. 5~. BERGEN: The eight foot right of way is 200 feet long? MR. LATHAM: The right of way is 10 feet all the way. THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. King explained it to me. Some of it I experienced myself. I don't know how much is accurate. Mr. Latham may have something to say to cast some light on it. (Mr. Latham presented a deed to the prope~tyo Said deed described the property and stated it ran together with a 10 foot right of way. ) THE CHAIRMAN: This is the original deed? MR. LATHAM: Right. THE CHAIRMAN: This was recorded November~ 1963. Anyone else wish to speak against this application? ROBERT LONG: I have a map by Otto Van Tuyl that shows that right of way as 8~ feet. This map is dated 196B. (Mr. Long presented said map to the Board of Appeals.) THE CHAIRMAN: I don't know how the ~ight of way graduated to 10 feet, ROBERT LONG: That is the mystery. THE CHAIRMAN: The right of way isn't applied for here. The situation as I see it when told by Mr. Latham is it will assist in developing this property. My. understanding from Mr. Latham was that he is willing to assist as far as he can the road to the east of his property. This may be made into a Town Road by deeded right of way to the Town across property that he owns. A question of just how he should enter and egress from this property now and for the next one or two years, providing that this is granted~ is something else again. It seems you people are sitting there with Southo~d Town Board of Appeals -11- April 11, 1968 THE CHAIRMAN: (Con't): property that can't be used. I don't know how you could develope it up there. It would be presumptuous for us to assume that these rights could be~f8;~d here tonight. Granted, it is difficult to take trucks in and out of an 8~ foot right of way. That isn't th~ question or.sue tonight. The question tonight is a cement mix pla~. This is related only in part to the issue. %'~at I am trying to say, I think, that it would be better for all of us tonight to work together rather than prevent one party from us~g what has been more or less in existence for many years. There ha~e been periods o.f more or less activity. There are two or three that use it now. As far as fixing the road is concerned, that could be achieved by a condition. 5~. LATHAM: We take care of that road up there for our own benefit. We are the only ones that ha~e done somethin9 on it. THE CHAIRMAN: You put 99% of the wear on it. MR. C.C. COOK: Is~his ri9ht of way 10 feet~ in addition to the 8~ feet? I was wondering~hat the traffic is there. Do you have any idea? We don't live there. There are three or four houses on that right of way. This could be a nuisance. THE CHAI~ta~N: They built knowing that the sand pit was there. 5~. C.C. COOK: ?~ knew it was there. of a 18 foot road? There is possibility MR. L~T~AM: There has been some discussion over the ownership of the entrance. THE CHAIRMAN: I think this is the best place for it. If you aren't goin9 to put a cement manufacturing plant there, where would you put it. This is zone~ industrial. This should not be special exception, it should be required exception. The word special indicates its some special dispensatiom of this ~ard, which it isn't. C.C. COOK: Any idea of the traffic there? MR. LATHAM: It depends. We have three or four trucks going in and out of there. THE CHAIRMAN: It would also depend on the building activity. Anyone need~g transit mix~ it might be better to have it locally. UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: I just noticed that on the other side of Mr. Latham's property there is quite a wide right of way. CHAIRMAN: I believe that is a private right of way. MR. LATHAM: It has been used for several years. THE CHAIRMAN: The right of way on the east side. MR. LATHAM: 'Chat is private. It will be open to the public some- t~e in the future. Southold Town Board of Appeals -12- April 11, 1968 THE CHAIRMAN: Is there anyone else who wishes to speak against this application? IRVING L. PRICE, JR.~ESQ.: I am an attorney with an office at 238 Main Street, Greenport. I represnt Robert Long, the adjoining neighbor, adjoining land owner and neighbor. I call your attention to the Section 500, and a special exception is necessary, and 9o over to Article VIII, Section 80lA - C, Spgcial powers and Rules. Matters of Original jurisdiction and by appli- cation to the Board of Appeals~ and all of the matter that must be considered by the Board be~re such permissive use may be permitted. I call your attention to the fact, finding of facts substan~iate that evidence must be introduced, a/id I submit that there has been little evidence submitted here to provide the necessary findings before the use may be permitted. THE CHAIRMAN: Does anyone wish to rebut anything that has been said here? (There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: I assume that it can be proved this has been continuously used? MR. LATHAM: Yes. STAN~BY CORWIN, ESQ.: I don~t think that is a necessary elective of proof here tonight. IRVING L. PRICE, JR., ESQ.: I would agree with co, eel. THE CHAIRMAN: It might help the people who are here tonight. The property is zoned industrial. When the Ordinance was first put in, all sand pits were zoned Industrial. IRVING L. PRICE, JR., ESQ.: I point out that the zoning Ordinance requires a special exception for this use and the fact that it has been a sand pit is no problem. The use that has been applied for is the problem. THE CHAIRMAN: There is alot in what Mr. Corwin says that Cement manufacturin9 is a complete different operation. IRVING L. PRICE, JR. ,ES~.: If Mr. Corwin was in my position, he would call it nit-picking. THE CIr~IR~N: It is a different operation. I have seen cement operations. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: If the Board were to find that this was cement manufacture, as I read the Ordinance you don't grant a special exception. Section 500 mentions some 45 uses that are permitted, of which 1, 17, and 34, are the only ones for which the Board grants special exceptions. Southold Town Board of Appeals -13- April 11, 1968 HOWARD TBRRY~ Building Inspector: I think Mr. Corwin has an out-dated Ordinance. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: (Referring to present up-dated Ordinance) All of these 45 different types of permitted uses may be subject of granting of Speeial Exception. Then I go back to my preliminary argument that this is not cement manufacture. THE CHAIP~t%N: It seems to me that Mr. Corwin is right as he reads the law. As to what was meant when this part was put in the Ordinance, that is one of the things this Board must interpret. The building inspector says this came up when the Ordinance was being written, so I assume that we are considering this legally. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: If that holds true, they should have said so in so many words so that there would be no question. THE CHAIRMAN: Is there any other discussion on this application? ~There was no response.) THE CHAIRMAN: Mr. Latham,would you be one of the partners in th~ operation? MR. LATHAFI: I expect to be. THE CHAIRMAN: How active do you expect to be? MR. LATHAM: We have to get this settled first. (Another discussion was held on the right of way leading into the property. This was also discuseed from a survey map. THE CHAIRMAN: The Board has to make an interpretation first whether or not a special exception has to be granted for a transit mix plant. MR. GRIGONIS: Maybe we should recess the hearing and discuss this f~ther. THE CHAIRMAN: We could. ROBERT LONG: It would seem to me that in respect to Mro~ing, it might be better to recess it. He knows the history of the property. (Mr. C. C. Cook presented a survey to the Board showing the property that h~urchased. Again a lenghty discussion was held on the use of the right of way.) THE CHAIRMAN: I think we should postpone further discussion on this. ST~dNLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: May I ask when this will come up again? Southold To%~ Board of Appeals -14- April 11, 1968 THE CHAI~I~N: ~ meet again in two weeks. STDdk~_EY CORWIN, ESQ.: Is there anything else the Board feels that it would like to have from the applicant? THE CHAIRMAN: I don~t think there is anything else we would llke to have. STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: Would you like a memoranda on the interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance.? THE CHAIRMAN: I think we understand your position~ but we would like to have it. There are several questions here. The cement mixture and it's affect on the area; the property is zoned industrial; we have to consider access to the property; and whether this requires a special exception or not. We will have the benefit of Town counsel's interpre~mtion on this. STANLEy CORWIN,~SQ~ g am not sure the significance of the problem that you attach to access. THE CHAX~%N: We are required to consider a number of things with special.exceptions? (The Chairman read the list of items to be considered before granting a special exception.) STANLEY CORWIN, ESQ.: I realize that all of those things are applicable to all special exceptions, or appropriate to special exceptions when you are considering gasoline stations or things of that type. I call your attention to Section 400, subsection 22. There you are ta]~ng about a business district. "The stripping of land to secure satisfactory top soil for grading or other purposes is permitted, provided material so obtained is used on the immediate premises. If a buildln~ is being constructed or altered material excavated in connection with such construction or grading on the premlsesmay be sold however cement block manufacturing, and natural production uses sueJa as the excavation for sale of sand, gravel, clay~ shale or other natural mineral deposit are permitted only as a special exception by the Boardof Appeals." That is the kin~ of special exception in connection %~th a similiar use that would be applicable to the industrial place that we have here. That is that provision with respect to the B zone, and~hen you get into the Industrial zone, that is not required. IRVING L. PRICE, JR., ESQ.: I submit that it is required. A special exception in the business zone and industrial zone require the same findings on the part of the Board ~f Appeals. Southold T~vn Board of Appeals -15- April 11, 1968 5~. LHTHAM: Many of the people have been living with this for 20 years and there ~asn~t been any opposition. ROBERT LONG: It hasn't been transit m/x plant. 5~. LATHAM: There is probably more traffic with the sand and gravel than there would be with the transit mix. MR. HULSE: Will you still use this for sand and gravel? MR. LATHAM: It will be used in connection with it. MR. HULSE: Will it still be taken out separately at time? MR. LATHAM: No very much. One or two trucks for the transit mix can take care of what four trucks took care of before. THB CHAIRSt~N: How many people would this employ? MR. LATHAM: About a half a dozen men. TI{~ CHAI~ta~N: It would be seasonal work? MR. LATHAM: No, they work year around. They can make other cement products in the winter. THE CHAIR~L~N: What would they make? 5~. LATHAM: Covers for cesspools. This t~pe of thing. THE CPLa. IPdV~N: Is there anything else~ C.C. COOK: %~nat type of operation would it be. Would it be just diggers and bulldozers? MR. LATHAM: No, converyor belts. THE CHAIRSt~N: You would have to fence the operaticm. Anyone else wish to say anything about this application? (There was no response.) On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLED that the hearing on Appeal no. 1175, Irving C, Latham, Main Road, Orient, New York, be recessed until 8:00 P.M., Thursday, April 25, 1968, at the Tovm ~ff£ce, Main Road, Southold, New York. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse ~. Grigonis~ ~. Doyen. Southold Town Board of Appeals -16- April 11, 1968 On motion by Mr. Gillispie, seconded by Mr. Hulse, it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Board of Appeals set 7:30 P.M.(E.S.T.), Thursday, April 25, 1968, at the Town Qffice, Main Road, Southold, New York, as the time and place of hearing upon application of Stanley S. Corwin, Esq., 640 First Street, Green- port, New York, a/c Mary Mooney Getof£, Waterview Drive, Bayview, Southold, New York, for an interpretation of the SoutholdTown Building Zone Ordinance, Article III, Sectimn 303; Article X, Section 1000A. Location of property: N/E corner of Waterview Drive Souttzld, New York, bounded north by land of Getoff, east by Wilkinson, south by Waterview Drive, west by land of Getoff. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Mr. Gillispie, Mr. Bergen, Mr. Hulse, Mr. Grlgonis, Mr. Doyen. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.~I. Respectfully submitted, Barbara C. Dittmann, Secretary Southold Town Board of Appeals