The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-5656Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Attic Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 5, 2002 Mr. John Costello Costello Marine Contracting Co~p. PO Box 2124 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: SCTM# 81-3-19.4 JAMES MILLER 1610 Paradise Point Southold, NY Dear Mr. Costello: The following action xvas taken by the Board of Toxvn Trustees during a Regular Meeting, held on November 20th, 2002 regarding the above matter. WHEREAS, Costello Marine Contracting Corp. on behalf of James Miller applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated March 8, 2002 WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a Public Heating was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on November 20th 2002 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standard set forth in Chapter 97-18 of the Southold Town Code. WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approved the application of JAMES MILLER for a Wetland Permit to construct a 4'x 40' ramp continuing with a level 4'x30' dock and 6'x70' dock and ending with a 6'x24' "L" dock pointed northeast on the northeast side of the dock to construct a 4'x4' platform with a 3'x10' ramp leading to a 4~1/2'x20' lower platform additional installing two 2 pile dolphins and one single pile for ice pilings. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Fee must be paid, if applicable and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. If inspections are required, at a fee of $5.00 per inspection (See attached schedule). FEES: $5.00 Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/cjc cc DEC Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO.. t~,,~4,~'~J~ DATE: ..Nov. Z0,. 2002 ISSUED TO ............................ ~[AMES...MIJ. J~E R ........................................ XuI'harizatiun Pursuant fo the provisions of Chapter 615 of the L~ws of the State of New York, 1893; and C, hepfer 404 of the L~ws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATINC= AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN ' WATERS;!?. and Jn accordance with the Resolution of The Board adopted et a meeting held on ~N.o=...20 ......... · ZOO.Z-, and in consideration of the sum of $... 2.g.g.:.00 ... peld by ...gos.t ello ..Marine.. Cont r acting. · Got p, on-..bel~l.f -.-o f.:.-Jame$ .'-Mille] of ....... Greenpo~t~-..i; ............... N. Y. and subject to the Terms and Gonddtons listed on the reverse side hereof, of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: Wetland Pen'nit 1o construct a 4'x 40' ramp continuing with a level 4'x30' dock and 6'x70' dock and ending with a 6'x24' "L" dock pointed northeast on the aortheast side of the dock to constroct a 4'x4' platform with a 3'xlO' ramp leading to a 4-1/2'x20' lower plat fomi additional installing two 2 pile dolphins and one single pile for ice pilings. alt in accordance w~th the detailed specdmations as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these ~.resenfs fo be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of thts date. Tr~t~e$ TER~S ,,nd CONDf110NS e, l.~r of the consideratt~ fo~ the ~suance of ~e P.~ do~s undetstmd and prescribe to the L That the said Boa~ o~ Tt~ee~__ and the Town ~ Somhold ate released from say ~d with ,espect thereto, to the c0mplete'exclmloa of the Bomt of Tmseeu ~ the Town zf Southoid for au extra'on may be made to the Board It t ~ da~e. 5. That chis Petmlt should be retained inde~'mit~y, ot as loog zs the said Pem~t~ee wishes to meier,;- d~c stmcu~e of project involved, to provide evidence t~ anyone concerned ~ ~ o~fio~ w~s otiginslly obt~i. 4. That the work involved will be subject to the inspection sad approve1 o~ the Bo~d o~ agents, and nowcomp'-,,,~e with the provisions o~ the o~,~g ~pl, fi~tioa, may be ~-.~ fo~ revocation of this Petmlt by t~,olution o~ the said Board. 5. That there will be no un~easomble interference with oa~igatlon as · resul~ of the h,et'e, in m~thotlzed. 6. That there shall be no intolerance with tho right o~ the public to po. ss and the beach between high and low water 7. Ths~ if future op~om of the Town of 8o~thold s~nlg'e die t*e~ and/re' ~ ~ ~ ~~m~ orff,~~~T~. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Pennittee ot ~he ~ o~ the wodt anth- ot'ized. 9. That the Petmittee will oi~aln aU. other permits and comeaU d~t may be plement~ to this permit which may be subject to t~voke upon f~lh~g to oiZ~n nme. Albert J. Krupski, President Jamea King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 So.ill%Id, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 JAMES MILLER YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES 72 HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE WORK, TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION. FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION AND POSSIBLE REVOCATION OF THE PERMIT. INSPECTION SCHEDULE Pre-construction. hay bale line 1st day of construction ~ constructed Project complete, compliance inspection. Costello Marine Contracting Corp. Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Costello Marine Contrcting Corp. nn heh~]£ ~.T~ ~Tl1~ Please be advised that your application, dated March 8. 2002 has been reviewed by this Board, at the regular meeting of November 20. 2002 and the ( ~) Application Approved (__) Application Denied (__) Application Tabled following action was taken: (see below) (see below) (see below) Final If your application is approved as noted above, a permit fee is now due. Make check or money order payable to the Southold Town Trustees. The fee is computed below according to the schedule of rates as set forth in the instruction sheet. The following fee must be paid within 90 days or re-application fees will be necessary. COMPUTATION OF PERMIT FEES: Inspection Fee @$5.00 TOTAL FEES DUE: BY: PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES 4/98 COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES · BULKHEADING ° STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET " P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 · ~31)~477-1199/. __ . .... 47_~_1393_ / 4;~'-06.82 · FAX (631) 477-0005 October 17, 2002 Southold Town of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Continuation of James Miller Dock Application Hearing. We are providing the requested of a copy of the New York State Department of Conservation (NYSDEC) permit 1-4738- 01661/00003. The NYDEC permit allows for the construction of a 4' x 40' ramp starting just above apparent high water (AMHW), than proceeding with a 4' x 40' catwalk / dock section and continuing with a 6' x 70' dock. At that point we are permitted to construct a 6' x 24' "L" with a wave curtain attenuator. From the "L" we are allowed to install a 32" x 12' ramp unto a 6' x 20' floating dock. Please note the NYDEC requested the removal of the 15,000 pound boat lift and allowed the 30' section of splash board (Attenuator) as an alternative. Also the DEC allowed the construction of (2) 3 pile dolphins approximately 25' south of proposed dock in order to protect the narrower inshore section of the proposed permitted dock from ice. The overall length of proposed structure is the same as the Trustees application of the 150'. No other specific Environmental concern were addressed to the applicant at late evenings hearings extension. Also enclosed is a letter of General Concurrence from the State of New York, Department of State. I would also like to inquired, as to where and when the Trustees intend to meet with the Nature Conservancy in regards to the impacts and effects of (docks), as mentioned by Trustee Dickerson. It would certainly be beneficial to us to be aware of how we may be better Environmentally educated. Respectfully, ostello Cc: James Miller LOCATIONI VICINITY MAP o ,~oo' , I O I ~. '~, A[~JAGENT PROPERTY OWNER,5: ,JOHN [ ,.lOAM PETI~0C.r"LLI ?-§O MA/,JOR. HIJNI'IN~TON~ NY 11"/4-~ ¢~-24-0 PARA~D1.-~,E I~1'. 14~0 PARA01~E P"~, ,.'5OUTHOLD~ I,,IY I I~TI- 510~ - PROPOSED: CON§TP..UCTINO A 4ix40~ I~AMP~ ¢OI~THqUIN0 WITH ^ LEVEL ,,~(Jx ~,O' 0OCK/ THEN A ~'x70~ POCK AND ENDIHO WITH WITH A ~ IO' ~AMP LEA~INO TOA ~.~x ~O LOWE~ PLAT~EM. AOPI~IONALLY/ INSTALLI~ TWO ~*PILE DOLPHIN5 AND ONE ~iN~L~ PIL~. ¢05TI/LLO MAI/.INI:: CONTRACTINO PO. I~0× 21~- OI~EF:NPOR:T, ~Y ~1~4-,~ APPLICANT: UAME5 MILLEI~. ~ EOWAI~I::).5 AVE. C~ALVERTON~ hJy (1(~10 P~,I~AOI,~I~- POINT JAN. I~,, MAI/. MAlt. ~,0~ lOO~ AU~. ~, NOV. I-// ,~00~ SHEET I OF5 I~OTTO M J IMSHOF..E DOE. F., BF_-TAIL 0 ~-: 4J ¢OSTELLO MAIElhlE CONTRACTINO /.,OEP, ~l- ~lT'?l ll~ APPLI C_.AN-r: ,J AM E.5 MILLER. ~ ~-{~WAP. D5 AVE CA LVP~ I~TO J~J i ~U~. ~ ~00~ NOV. 17~ ~HEI~T 5 OP 5 J r+'.5 / [ (o.o) CIR05.5 ,SECTtONI A-A 0 .~0' -IIV_L:ld I/N~O~l..LYqcl ~a~Oq ~ ~20d ~lOJ_.hO¢ ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER REGORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (5161 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer). One copy will be in response to your request, or as an interim response. to Town Clerk's returned to you SECTION I. TO: Sou~hold T~us~ees (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) File re James Miller application for dock Signature of Applicant: .~, '~/~:.'/~ Printed Name JA~Z/S E. FITZG~R Address Mailing Address Telephone Number ~D, JR. 385 HAYWATER$ DRIVE, OUTCHOGUE PO BOX 617, OUTCHOGUE NY 11935 631-734-5800 Date: 11/25/02 [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* [ ] DENIED* Eliza~'eth A. N~ville Freedom af Information Officer Su.,,,v,.[/~r4 ...... * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanation. PI~ o,J F_.CT LOC^TI 01~ LOCATI 01,4 VICINITY MAP' , I O I ~. [ 4-000' ADJACENT PI~OPERTY OWNEI[5: NOV ] (~) ,JOHI, J ~ ,JOAI,J PETfROCELLI {~) I~OI~EE'T ?-50 MAI, JOE R.D. 14'~0 PARADI~,~. P"E. HUN-rIN~TON~ NY I I"/'~l-~ 50U'I'HOI. D~ NY 1157L~'510.~ - CON$'r?I. IC. TIN(~ ^ 4]x4-O~ ?^lV~ COI,,ITII,4UIN~ WITH A LEVEL ~-'x ~o OOC,l~-t'H,=~l ^ ~ x?OI ~ocK ~D ~.~lt.,l~,~ Wi'TH E-A,~T 51DE OFTHE DOCKI COI',4STRUCTING A ,~,Jx..4J PLA'I'f=OI~Vl WITH A 3'x IO' I~AMp LEA{~ING TOA ,4-.5~x ~O LOWEE PLAT,mOI~M. APPlTIONALLY,, INSTALLIN~ TWO F~- PILE I~OLPHIN5 ANP ONE 51N~[iL E PILE. APPLI ,JAMES MILLER. $~58 EI~WARI~.5 AVE.. C, AL. VE.I~.TON~ NY ll°J~ ('IGIO PARADISE POINT R~ ,5.C.'T: M. IOOO-.~1 - 5- 1~.4- PREPAREO EJY: ¢OSTELLO MAR. I NE CONTEACTI NJ~ COEP. ~'~,1 - .4-77- II~JOJ ~ov. 1'7; ..~HEE~T I OF5 APPL I CA NIT: PLAT~Oe M 5~8 EOWA~D~ ~vE. ~ ~ CALVEETO~ ~Y I1~ ~ / ~ PREPA~E~ ~Y] ~ ~0. ~OX ~l~& 5REENPOIN% N~ I1~ MAR. ~.~00[ ~ ~l ~ MA~. ~, ~002 ' .~ 0 ~ ~HEET 2 OF .5 5NEET '~ OF 5 4'"~- (.~," 5TI~ I MCGEE t~,OTTOM DOCK ~ LOWED-. PLATFOIP-..M DETAIL 15' Iv'liN. PEN ETF,.A'I-I ON IN.~HOP-.E DOC. I~ DETAIL 0 ~ ~2 CO.~,TELLO MARII~E CONTI~.ACTIN~., CORP. &~l- 4-77- JAM F-..5 NOV. 17, ,,~I.-Ir:::EET 5 OF= -5 (D LOCATION M^.-P VIClI'W iTY AO,JAC. ENT ?('.'PEP. TY HUN'TINQffD,., NY ,t-. ~) I~0 bE K'r 14'~o 4.00 : H.STP. UC FING A 4]~40~ RAM~ CONTINUIN~ WITH A LEVEL IN'~TALLh4~ A ~ll~l~l ~MP ~EA~IN~ TO A ~'x~O* PLOA~ .~'.;DITIONALLY~ IN~TA~LIN~ TWO ~-PILE ~OLPHINS, PREPARE[:: C05TF_.LLO t,4.-,,, :NE COf,~TP-^CTIN(.'~ C::OI~R P.O. ~OX APPLI CANT: ,JAN. Ig, ~00[ MAI~. ~ [00~ MAIL ,~0~ ~'00~. AUG. ~, ~OOffi SHEET I OF C:O,~TF_-LLO MARINE. CONTIRACTIN~ ¢ORIR. I?O. ~,~× ~1~- ~F~E~NI°OINT~ Nh( 11~,4-~- ,SHEE~' P_. OF ~ (Iq F~ET WHEI~.E AMLW ~-0.0 ~-- -'[ I ~ a~'~ -:" :7-..:..~--.'.,:;,~ 'X P' , , , *o' L ~ L I ¢~0~ ~ECTIOI',I A-A C05'T'ELLO IVlAR. li'-IE ¢OI'4'TI~^C;TI I',1.~ ¢OR.P. ~0. E~OX ~1'~- ~R. EIEI,,IPoIE'T', N'( t~.4- Appil ¢/NNI-j-: CALVE~TON, N~ t l~ JAN. I~, 8002 AU~I ~, ~oo[ MA~.~OI ~00~ f- ti' FLOAT I~EEL. FLO^TI ON o ~ O"~x ~'~' PILE ~X.¢# ,~T I~1 N ~ ~.1~ I0'¢ x ¢0' [N~I~E PILE5 ~OTTOM APPlICAnT: ,JAMF-~ MIILB~ ~ I~iO P/~I~ P~ ~.~ AU~, ~ ~ 00~ SHEET ~ OF (a "T'OF~ VIEW I I EL. + ~.0 '~ L.'+&.O ~L.+Z.5 I I I I -- ~t MIN. OFF ~O~TOM /~MLW · SPLAS.H:ISOAED C;'1~O55 OECTION -. O AI~PLICANT, UAME~ M I LLr:I~ (1~,1o PAI~AI~I~E Pm ~OT?O M j P E N ff..,.Tl~A'l"l ON CO,~TELLO MARINE ¢ONTI~.C-rlNO ¢ORP, ,, APPLI GAN'T: ,,JAMF-.5 M I L..L.I~IR. '~.~,,~ I~DWA~P5 AVE. · C.A l-V'~ J~TO N i N~T~ AU~. '~ Copy COSTELLO MARINE ..CONTRACTING. CORP01 TiON DOOK BUILDING · JE'ITI~ · ~IULKHEADINO, ~I'EEL & ~ PIUN(~. FLOATS STREET · la, O, BOX~f:~4 · (3RIEENPOI~,., NEW ¥OIqK 11~44 * (~l)4?T.11~/4??.138a/47;I..Or~2 November 12o 2002 Mr. ]ames Miller 538 Edwards Avenue Calverton, NY 11933 Modifications for proposed Dock Project ~6~0 Paradise Point Road South~U, NY 11971 Mr. Miller, In regards to our _r~__nt conversations i~ is my understanding ~hat you are willing :o reduce the scope of your SoutJlold Town applica~n in order to lessen the environmental impacts and remain consistent with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) approval as per permit #~.4738-0:[661/00003. My understanding Is that you are willing to make the following modifications: ·Reduee t~ proposed 6~ 40' Insl~ore ramp to a 4' width. · After the ramp area, ~ the n~X~ 40' I~hore end from a 6' wij[h to a 4' width, ~ at this time (may reapply at a later clare If necessaw):'the 15,000 lb. boatllR from tte ol~ore south slcle as per the recommendation of Chris Arleen of t~ NYSOEC and his concern that the lifting beams may hit bottom and dl~urb the benthic community. [n.,-tead of the boatl~ end our concerns of rough weather damaging your boat the NYSDEC has allowed for the construction of a 30' splashboard beneath the offshore section, ~t is my undemanding that your am also willing to ~ this ~tlon of' the project, ~,~ -,~ ~ ~ '/~ ~ ~ ~ .~ , IIIIIIIIII III ~ ~ , AMHW 5~ EOWAK~ AVE. VldlNITY , 1 ~ I ~ ~ ,4-000* I-OCA'I"I ON LOCATION 0 4-00' APdA,CENT PROPERTY .JOHN ~ ,JoAkl PETIi~0Cr--.LLI ?-50 /',.4A Id 0 R HUNTIN~TON,. NY 1174-~ 1490 PARADISE Pr;. I~.IR 5OUTHObD~ NY 11971- CON:STRLJCTIN{3 A ~x40~ ~^MP~ CONTINUIN~ WITH A LEVEL- EAMP LEADIN~TOA~x~O~ FLOAT. INSTALLIN0 A lS/OOOL~. ~T LIFT 0N THE 5OUTHWE~T 51DE. DY WATE~ U~IN5 CEANE/5AESP PR E PA I;[E. D I~Y: CO.'~TELL0 MAJ~.I NE CONTEACTI NO COPE P.O. E;~OX 212Jr GREENPOR'T'~ Ny 11'E'4.,4' ~, 3H - 4-"/'-r - 119oJ APPLI CANT: ~AN. I~, ~00~ MAI(. ~, [00~ SHEET I OF 4- (;O~IT;:LLO Iv~AI~.INF-.., CONTI~ACTIN~ I?0. ~0X 2124- GRE. ENP01N'T]~ N~' APPLICANT: ,.JAI~ E~ ( I~10 MAR. ~ ~00~ 5H~T ~ OF 4- IN I=~,ET ~VHE~.~ A, h4LW =0, 0 ~ ~ ~6,ooo L~. / ~ 150~ ¢ ~0' ~MP I I0' F+~'~ ;*~ ,Z' - /~[~. ,,,, . ;,. ,,, ,. , _ ~ .,,,, ~,, ,,,,, ,,,,, .,,~ ~11 I I 6E055 5ECTIOM A-A o APPLICANT ~ .SHEET ~J OF 4, AMHW U0GK DETAIL F L. OAT'A'I- I 0~ FLOAT PETAl L P[EPA~EP IbM: ¢O,~TELLO MARINE CONTI~ACTll4~ C01~.P. 1199 APPLICANT, d AM E,~ MILLE[ ' .558 EPWA~.D,~ AVE. CALV[RTO~i NY 119~ {1~10 PARADISE P~ ,4AN. I% ~00~ M~. g~ ~00~ ..~HEE-r 4- OF 4- STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF STATE 4 I STATE STREET ALBANY, NY I ;~23 I -000 I GEORGE E. PATAKI March 25, 2002 RANDY A. DANIELS Jane Walsh CostelloMarine Con~acting Corp. P.O. Box 2124 Greenpo~,NYl1944 COpy F-2002-0243 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York District Permit Application - James Miller - conslruct 6'x 40' ramp, 6'x 110' dock, 6'x24' dock, 32"x12' ramp, 6'x20' float, 15,000 pound boat lift. Shelter Island Sound, Town of Southold, Suffolk County General Concurrence Dear Mrs. Walsh: The Department of State received your Federal Consistency Assessment Form and consistency certification and supporting information for this proposal on March 11, 2002. The Department of State has determined that this proposal meets the Department's general consistency concurrence criteria. Therefore, further review of the proposed activity by the Department of State and the Department's concurrence with an individual consistency certification for it is not necessary. When communicating with us regarding this matter, please contact Mohabir Persaud at (518) 474-1737 and refer to our file # F-2002-0243. Supervisor of Consistency Review and Analysis New York Coastal Management Program sm CC: COE/New York District -Marc Helman NYSDEC/Region 1- John Pavacic New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits Building 40 - SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Telephone (631) 444-0365 Facsimile (6311 444-0360 Erin M. Crotty Commissioner September 11, 2002 Mr. James Miller 538 Edwards Avenue Calverton, NY 11933 RE: 1-4738-01661/00003 Dear Permittee: In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. If you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the above address. Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted at the project site and protected from the weather. Sincerely, DMG/Is Enclosure Darleen M. Gerbino Environmental Analyst DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-01661/00003 FACILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(S) NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION I EFFECTIVE DATE RM IT September lt, 2002 EXPIRATION DATE(S) Under the Environmental September 30, 2007 Conservation Law TYPE OF PERMIT · New [] Renewal [] Modification [] Permit to Construct [] Permit to Operate [] Article 15. Title 5' Protection of Waters [] Article 15, Title 15: Water Supply [3 Artiole 15, Title 15: Water Transport [] Article 15, Title 15: Long Island Wells [] Article 15, Title 27: Wild, Scemc and Recreational Rivers [] 6NYCRR 608: Water Quality Certification PERMIT ISSUED TO James Miller [] Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES [] Article 19: Air Pollution Control [] Article 23, Title 27: Mined Land Reclamation [] Article 24: Freshwater Wetlands · Article 25: Tidal Wetlands [] Ar[icle 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360: Solid Waste Mana~lement ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 538 Edwards Avenue, Calverton, NY 11933 [3 Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373: Hazardous Waste Management [] Article 34: Coastal Erosion Management E] Artice 36' Floodplain Management [] Articles 1, 3, 17 19, 27 37, 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control TELEPHONE NUMBER (631) 765-3331 CONTACT PERSON FOR PERMFr-rED WORK Costello Marine Contracting Corp., P.O. Box 2124, Greenport, NY NAME AND ADDRESS Of PROJECT/FACILITY 11944 TELEPHONE NUMBER (631) 477-1199 Miller property, 1610 Paradise Point Road, Southold COUNTY TOWN Suffolk Southold DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY: SCTM #1000o81-3-19.4 NYTM COORDINATES WATERCOURSE Shelter Island Sound Construct a recreational mooring facility consisting of: a 4' x 40' catwalk section, 6' x 70' catwalk section, 6' x 24' "L" shaped catwalk with wave attenuator, 32" x 12' ramp, 6' x 20' float and two 3-pile dolphins. All work must be done as shown on the attached NYSDEC approved plans. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, ali applicable regulations, the General Conditions specified (see page 2 & 3) and any Special Conditions included as part of this permit. PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR: I ADDRESS Region I Headquarters George W. Hammarth (DMG) Bldg. #.40, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Page 1 of 4 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NOTIFICATION OF OTHER PERMITTEE OBLIGATIONS Item A: Permittee Accepts Legal Responsibility and Agrees to Indemnification The permittee expressly agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York, its representatives, employees, and agents ("DEC") for all claims, suits, actions, and damages, to the extent attributable to the permittee's acts or omissions in connection with the permittee's undertaking of activities in connection with, or operation and maintenance of, the facility or facilities authorized by the permit whether in compliance or not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. This indemnification does not extend to any claims, suits, actions, or damages to the extent attributable to DEC's own negligent or intentional acts or omissions, or to any claims, suits, or actions naming the DEC and arising under article 78 of the New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules or any citizen suit or civil rights provision under federal or state laws. Item B: Permittee's Contractors to Comply with Permit The permittee is responsible for informing its independent contractors, employees, agents and assigns of their responsibility to comply with this permit, including all special conditions while acting as the permittee's agent with respect to the permitted activities, and such persons shall be subject to the same sanctions for violations of the Environmental Conservation Law as those prescribed for the permittee. Item C: Permittee Responsible for Obtaining Other Required Permits The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands, easements and rights-of-way that may be required to carry out the activities that are authorized by this permit. Item D: No Right to Trespass or Interfere with Riparian Rights This permit does not convey to the permittee any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work nor does it authorize the impairment of any rights, title, or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. GENERAL CONDITIONS General Condition 1: Facility Inspection by the Department The permitted site or facility, including relevant records, is subject to inspection at reasonable hours and intervals by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) to determine whether the permittee is complying with this permit and the ECL. Such representative may order the work suspended pursuant to ECL 71-0301 and SAPA 401(3). The permittee shall provide a person to accompany the Department's representative during an inspection to the permit area when requested by the Department. A copy of this permit, including all referenced maps, drawings and special conditions, must be available for inspection by the Department at all times at the project site or facility. Failure to produce a copy of the permit upon request by a Department representative is a violation of this permit. General Condition 2: Relationship of this Permit to Other Department Orders and Determinations Unless expressly provided for by the Department, issuance of this permit does not modify, supersede or rescind any order or determination previously issued by the Department or any of the terms, conditions or requirements contained in such order or determination. General Condition 3: Applications for Pen~it Renewals or Modifications The permittee must submit a separate written application to the Department for renewal, modification or transfer of this permit. Such application must include any forms or supplemental information the Department requires. Any renewal, modification or transfer granted by the Department must be in writing. The permittee must submit a renewal application at least: a) 180 days before expiration of permits for State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES), Hazardous Waste Management Facilities (HWMF), major Air Pollution Control (APC) and Solid Waste Management Facilities (SWMF); and b) 30 days before expiration of all other permit types. Submission of applications for permit renewal or modification are to be submitted to: NYSDEC Regional Permit Administrator, Region 1, SUNN Bldg #40, Stony Brook NY 11790-2356 General Condition 4: Permit Modifications, Suspensions and Revocations by the Department The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 621. The grounds for modification, suspension or revocation include; a) materially false or inaccurate statements in the permit application or supporting papers; b) failure by the permittee to comply with any terms or conditions of the permit; c) exceeding the scope of the project as described in the permit application; d) newly discovered material information or a material change in environmental conditions, relevant technology or applicable law or regulations since the issuance of the existing permit; e) noncompliance with previously issued permit conditions, orders of the commissioner, any provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law or regulations of the Department related to the permitted activity. DEC PERMIT NUMBER 1-4738-01661/00003 PAGE 2 OF 4 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ADDITIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (TITLE 5), 24, 25, 34 AND 6NYCRR PART 608 ( TIDAL WETLANDS) If future operations by the State of New York require an alteration in the position of the structure or work heroin authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Depadment of Environmental Conservation it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural resources of the State, the owner may be ordered by the Department to remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused thereby without expense to the State, and if1 upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be completed, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. The State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation or improvement of navigation, or for other purposes, and no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the rosponsibility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, New York State Office of General Services or local government which may be required. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. Any material dredged in the conduct of the work herein permitted shall be romoved evenly, without leaving large refuse piles, ridges across the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of a waterway. 6. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work herein authorized. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, the project hereby authorized has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. If granted under 6NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation heroby certifies that the subject project will not contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under Sections 301,302, 303,306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (PL 95-217) provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met. 9. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee and contractor shall sign and return the top portion of the enclosed notification form certifying that they are fully aware of and understand all terms and conditions of this permit. Within 30 days of completion of project, the bottom portion of the form must also be signed and returned, along with photographs of the completed work and, if required, a survey. 10. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part of the permit application. Such approved plans were prepared by: 6 sheet set of drawinqs by Costello Marine Contractinq Corp. Sheets 1 of 6 throuqh 3 of 6 dated 1/19/02, last revised 8/3/02. Sheets 4 of 6 throuqh 6 of 6 dated 8/3/02. All sheets stamped "NYSDEC Approved 9/11/02". DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 3 OF 4 1-4738-01661/00003 NEW YORK STATE DEPAR'I3VIENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The 32" x 12' ramp and 6' x 20' float must be installed and removed on a seasonal basis. These structures must be installed no earlier than April 1 each year and removed no later than December 1 each year. 2. The removed ramp and float must be stored on the portion of the property landward of the bulkhead or another upland location. These components must not be stored on the beach. 3. The storage of construction equipment and materials must be confined to the contractor's barge or the area landward of the bulkhead, 4. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for disposal. No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands and or protected buffer areas. 5. The use of wood treated with I~m~l~ol~ahem~.ln the construction of structures that will be in contact with tidal waters is strictly I;a~a~t~d. 6. Installation of additional docks at marinas, boat basins, or other commercial facilities is not authorized by this permit. 7. eno dredging, excavating or other alteration of shoreline or underwater areas is authorized by this permit, nor shall issuance of this permit be construed to suggest that the Department will issue a permit for such activities in the futu re. 8. No permanent structures may be installed on dock/catwaIPJfloat without first obtaining written Department approval (permit, modification, or amendment), 9. Pilings may not: (a) extend beyond properly lines, (b) be placed so that docked boats extend over property lines, (c) interfere with navigation, (d) interfere with other landowners riparian rights. 10. No structures are to be constructed on pilings~,~,~heut:further authorization of the Department. DEC PERMIT NUMBER PAGE 4 of 4 1-4738-01661/00003 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION RETURN THIS FORM TO: COMPLIANCE Marine Habitat Protection NYSDEC , Building 40 - SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 I OR FAX TO: (631) 444-0207 ,SSUEDTO: PROJECT LOCATION/ADDRESS:' CONTRACTOR NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE:. Dear Sir: Pursuant to Supplementary Special Condition D of the referenced permit, you are hereby notified that the authorized activity shall commence on . We certify that we have read the referenced permit and approved plans and fully understand the authorized project and all permit conditions. We have inspected the project site and can complete the project as described in the permit and as depicted on the approved plans. We can do so in full compliance with all plan notes and permit conditions. The permit sign, permit end approved plans will be available at the site for inspection in accordance with general Condilion No. 1. (Both signatures required) PERMITEE DATE CONTRACTOR DATE THIS NO TICE MUST BE SENT TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS A T LEAST TWO DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE PROJECT AND /OR ANY ASSOCIATEO REGULATED ACTIVITIES. FAILURE TO RETURN THIS NOTICE. POST THE PERMIT SIGN, OR HAVE THE PERMI T AND APPROVED PLANS AVAILABLE Ar THE WORK SITE FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT MA Y SUBJECT THE PERMITTEE AND/OR CONTRACTOR TO APPLICABLE SANCTIONS AND PENAL TIES FOR NON- ~ooD ~g '~00~ 'Gl GGII -2..2.~ - I~ ~ (i31~l .LNIOd :JGIOV~IVd ~ =J'V'I I WI c~ g IAI~'p : ..L. N ~' :D I 'l ....I ~I ~' o)OIg-t~-$11 AH ~O"lOHJ. dOg ,00%, ~ =I "¢ IAI N O I ..L V' D O "I fi) ¢.l,L~l AN ~O.LeNLLHnH :c~'~laN6n, o ),,_L~l:ldO~ld £N~DYPd¥ ~4 01 "'II VL~d ~f O0,d M I-I I~IV , 'Il ~0(~ ~..~ V~ OIJ_O~ ll,i2x20Z2 il:~ 651~6~9~6 * ~770~05 N0.152 ~2 Copy COSTELLO MARINE .,CONTRACTING. CORPORATION OOOK BUILDING · j~rrl'l~. BULKH~I~. ~EEL & ~ PIUN~, FLOATS No~m~r 12, 2002 Nr. ]ames Miller 538 Edw~l$ ~venue Calvarton, NY tzg33 Modifications for Propcmed Dock. Project 263.0 ParadM Point Road Southotd, NY 1~97t Dear Mr, NIller, [n regards to our recent conversations t is rny understanding that you are willing :o reduce the sco~e of your Southold Town application )n order to lessen the environmental impacts and remain consistent with the New York State Oe~rtment of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) approval as per permit ~3.4738-0~.661J00003. Ny understanding is that you are willing to make the following modifications: · ~ the propo~d 63 40' In~:~e ramp to a &' wIclth. · ~ the ramp area, re~uclaa the n~x~ 40' inshore ena from a 6' width to a 4' width. ~ at this time (may mappl¥ at a later date If necessaW);' the tS0000 lb, boatilft from the offshore south slcle as per the recommendation of Chris Arfsten of the NYSDEC and his concern that the IIRlng beams may hit 13ottom and disturb the benthic commune. [nsteod of the boatlift and our concama of' rough weather damaging your boat the NYSDEC has allowed for the construction of a 30' splashboard beneath the o~hore seclJon, it is my unde~.~ncllng that your are also w/lllflg to ~ this ~rtlon of the orojec':, d EI'Ty / J I ~;~4- L, DOCI r~ PLAN VIEW FT I I (+=.~ ¢0.0) , CE055 SECTION SHEET ~ OF 4- LOC^TIONI MAP coNbTP-UCTINe-,~ A ~x40~ ~AM~ CONTINUING wITH A LEVE~ THEN A ~X70~ DOCK AMD EMDIN~ W TH ~OCK POINTIN~ ~ETHEA~T A~D HAVIN~ A ~"~1~I ~ LEA~IN~ ~0 ~ ~0~ ~LO~ .~ODITIO~ALLY~ IN~TALLINe TWO 8-PILE DOLPHINS. PREPARED GO,~"r~LIO M~.R.J ~F= ¢ONTP-.AC;TIN(.~ (;OEP, dAN, I~, ~00~ MAI~. ~, ~00~ MAI~. 50~ PO0~ SHEET I OF ¢, ~O~T~LLO MAEINE CONT~ACTIN~ P.O. ~OX ~'lffi4- GffiF-.~I='OII'4~ f,,l'q ll~4-& x 20' APPLICANT: JAMES MILIE~ 558 E~WA~5 AVE. JAN. I.~, aO0~ 5HF__..F_-.T 2 OF ~ C05TEL. LO MAI{INE ¢OHtRACTING Col~l~. ~0~ ~ - ~ P. EEL ~L.O,~T ~ O~ FLOAT <::;P-.O~.~ .~P-CTION~, x g~' PILE 0.0 -- -- At,/I H W' I0~ ~ ~0' INSIDE PILE~ ,,,4/W ~oTTOM [::'o~., K D.~ TA I L ,~HI~ET 4 OF ~ I I ~,' x ;o" I I EL.. + ~.0 F.[_.*.t. ~.c U^MI~ M I I,- I- I[: R. (1~10 PAJ~AJ~I.~E Pm RD.") .~,L)~. ~, ~.00~ ~O~'TO ~4 J OOCF, OETAIL ,, ¢O,~TELI..O MAltINE CiONTI~.CTIN~ I~o. ~,o× ~_~4- ~I~,~'EI41oO~.Tt NY ~HEET ~ o~ ~ Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dicker~on BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone 1631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 August 19, 2002 Mr. John Costello Costello Marine Contracting Corp. P.O. Box 2124 Greenport, NY 11944 RE: JAMES MILLER 1610 Paradise Point Rd., Southold SCTM#81-3-19.4 Dear Mr. Costello: The Board of Trustees request the above-captionett hearing scheduled for Wednesday, August 21, 2002 be postponed. The Board will not bc taking action this month, as this environmentally sensitive project deserves continued special review. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Albert J. Kmpski, .Il., President Board of Trustees AJK:lms 87~2~/2082 1~:57 N0.230 3arnes Miller PO Box 1867 1610 Paradise Point Road Southold, NY 11971 ]uly 23, 2002 Dear Mr. Krupski, ! was contacted today by the assistant to The Board of Trustees regarding the hearing tomorrow evening on our application for a dock at our residence located at 1610 Paradise Point Rd. As I understand it, the Trustees are Interested in me requesting a postponement of the vote on the subject application to further evaluate and digest the supplemental information we have provided in support of our application. We are confident that the facts prove that the existing docks south of our property have in no way caused silting or negatively Impacted underwater plants or animals and that there is no indication whatsoever that construction of the proposed dock will similarly have any adverse affect on the environment, navigation etc. Moreover there is a significant body of scientific data that shows docks are beneficial to the environment by affording the marine environment with micro ecosystems akin to artificial reefs. Nevertheless we understand your desire to furl~er evaluate the supplemental information we have provided, As such ! accept the Trustee's decision to postpone the vote on our application, (~, ×~/~0 2 i~:57 53~ Edwam% Ave, Cahm~n. NY 11933.'1628 Fax; 63t~38g-4~8 Miller Environmentals N0.230 Mr. Krul:~,ki From: James Miller Sr. ext. 234 765-1366 Pqe~; 2 including cover ~t~ 7/23~2002 Dock InslallatJon U~ent X For Review n Pleaae Comment [] Plmme Repllr I-] Ploa~ Reb"y~e COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES · BULKHEADING · STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET · P,O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 · (631) 477-1199/477-1393/477-0682 · FAX (631) 477-0005 July 1, 2002 Southold Town Trustees Albert Krupski, President PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 JUL ?r~i. Dear Mr. Krupski: At the recent public heating in the matter of our client James Miller's pending application to construct a dock in Great Hog Neck, the question arose as to the water depths in the area and the affect a dock(s) would have. Enclosed please find numerous Coastal Geodetic and NOAA charts. Included is chart #299 dated 1916; #363 dated 1965 and chart #12358 from 1976, 1984, 1991 and 1994. The NOAA charts and Coastal Geodetic charts show no appreciable shoaling of the water depths and if anything slightly more water is obtained, due ptimar/ly to the r/sing oft/des. The aforementioned charts are photocopies enlarged 141%. Also enclosed, please find an article fi.om the February 2001 National Geographic magazine indicating how and to what degree tides are rising. The two docks to the south of Mr. Miller's property, the first built for Robert Stott and the second belonging to Joseph Macari. Neither of these structures has interrupted or acted as a groin by shoaling the existing water depths. As you are aware from an environmental standpoint the Miller site has no inter-tidal marsh (IM) vegetation or eel grass and considerably more flushing action occurs at this propose location than in any of the more senitide, vegetated inner creeks in Southold. Lastly, as I offered, if the Southold Town Trustees feel they have a defined purpose for a dinghy with a site viewer in the bottom, I will make one that I possess available to them. If Costello/Southold Town Trustees Page 2 of 2 July 1, 2002 the dinghy is of no realistically defined purpose I do not intend to make the additional effort of providing it. Respectfully, President JAC:lch eric. cc: James Miller .... " " "~ ........... /~ ~ ~ .." ~~'~ -. ..' Q.....- ...:...-. ~ ..... :' % ..' .." ~ · ...~ '.5. ~ "~ 'z~m,~6¢' ~ ...... :.~.~ t~ ' I1~ "": '. :~3 7~ 'C" ~ :'~ / / · .. :.. .'~2 :'.. "'~'"'( t ..v : I ~ :." ....' : : ~rd 2~,." ~ 3J[ :."'.. ". " ' ::'./ 16 ~ ~ 3 ' ::" ..... '"' ~. ......... ~ ..... : ......................... "~.'" ...'( .-"t~ 6~~ ~. ~o,.7 .... "~ . ' ... ..... ~, ~ .... ., ,.~?.. .~ ...'.:...-.,~ ...~ ......... ~ .. . '"'.L'.~- ~"".. ' ' ~'~ ..~ ..'" ..:'~ ~ ~ '..~i~'.:'.-:.~ ....... ... ~ '...... :. ? ~ :. "'....-: ~9'"' ............ ~ ..." ..:' "~3~ 70 ".'Y '~f'~:~f.. :"'-"~ ..'"'rS"?.. ' " ~ ¢ ". ..' " ~ : ~ ~.'(~". 30 .' ......... :'' ~ ~ ~ ... ,, .... ~,. t¢ .~." ..." ,, ' ~..~'"'" ~ '.::.....' N'~' .: 57 . '" '"" , 23 ..."'.~....'" 7, ..]~:, 3d"-. ...' ...... ' '"'-.l~".. ". '". -. 2 ~ . ....... :""~ ' it v"'~:. 37 35 ':' ~9 '"" ~¢ : ""- ', : ~':': 23 26 ......' ......" ..[ :'. 53 25 '" ...: ......... ~d ~... ~, ~ ". '~. ~ 2~ 8~ ..' ~3 tg'"' ..'" 28 ' '10 / ': '.. '.. ~3 '"" ': .: ~ 32 29~ · .. k.k ~""'"': .: ~ ~o ~ '." " : '6~- ............. ~ ~ ,Z~ ".. ,,.? ..... ' '" ' ~ -" o ".'" '~ ~' "' ,z, . .~.~ ~ '.. ,,~ : - .~'-.. - '.. ii : ...... · . : '. ~ "'~_~ ' ",®~ "...t ...J' '".-.. ""-.~. ' :'"..' ~ ~ ~' . '..~ o . .'..-':::.'f"~ ' '* '.. ~, ~... '-. _ '..~ i' .~ ,o . ...'.. ~ .... · - .'- ~ · -.., '. · ....'. ~ ........ x ...~...:.,,, ,~ ..: -.. 4. .... :::.- ~ ... ~,.~: . ..,,- ,o :--,..' ."Y/,"~/~ ' tlc ...:..::..-o, ~ ,,.... ....~, ...? ?.....~ :::fl~A ...... <o, ..:........./////~.~;~ ;'.,:::- % o, ,,., '.._~ ~..: '.:::::'.....~o ":. ::'.." -., ~ ...',G .. ........... ::::",..-'>,'_~_[// ~E"/: . ..~ o ",. ~ :c~U!-: ......... '~ ~ ..-~.::~:',,'/,':':'::'. ................ " ...'"'..v'~/ ~\\~ ~ \ · ' ~o ~ '-. ~- ..-~' ~ "~ ~ .~-"'."~~ ~-~ z.. .- --..' ........ ~ .., .-::.:..".'~~" ~ ">Yr" ~_ >.>.>.>.>.>.>.>.>.~/I I % .~,~: .: ? .,-. ~ ...:..: ..~.~\ ~- .~_~-,x'x~_~-~ ,,,. k.._ .... .... cox,. ..' ¢ ~ ~ ~ u, :'-::':.:' ; ~ .... ............. .... ... z. _, ....... · :': ' .. "- c,-': ~ ....... .. '- ...............'~-~' ' ~' ~ .......... . ..... o.,. _ ~'....~ ~/..T' x,"~>-,~..~.' -' o @ 0 · 14M q S ,? ? :: / Subrn / /!**'37 II "' .-"'"'.\ :' / ! :*.'::'".*' ..".",J5': I ** "; 24 '. 40;': :'/''' ':31 STACK 48 h~ 77 G '/~ ' 9O 44 4O 16 65 i 53 \ 57 58 70 ......... ~- '~"~""~" ' ............................ ~ ........ 3 '! .. 16 N "~' q'~"'"'~ ~-°% 9 8 ............... .. ................ "-.11% !3_'.% ~- '. ..... 19 ........ %17 . ". ~ 20 ' :' *'" 15 '"' ~ 8 2~ 71 "......: 22 24 /'Z O G 2a Az' .~a2C 21 hrd ~A~- ' 8horee, :46 46 ~ -91 -'83 77 1.*'*" iq....':'....15 ~'.. 77 '."' :"i~'.. : ~6'-:"~ ' *'"i24% "'".... '"" ~ ':33 78 ' .~ ' :.: I1:' "'"' \11~'~ : ."* .mr ~6 "*..~-3 ~ "' ~i/e ,:/ 15 ,~1,~ 72C ? ." 15 ..-" N"I4" '. .... ' 24i 50 · ~ ..'"14/' ..'".~,'o'21 14/ -" .~: , ,:,19' .... 26 .. / 29 " 67 37. .. ....... · 42 · r-' :"~ 7.:' 37 .'." · :/ 16 ..""29 ! $ 65 ! ...... 68 G 'l; 72 ......'..~.,~, ¢,9 _,0 .-"~2 : 35 , '~1~..'.' .... ~, ~-2 " "....(!2'::.:.~" '... ? 14. *'" 9 ..' .' " 68 '..:'..".{2.;:~. "... 51 .... . ...... ' ....... ' ..... /' '*' ' ' ' .... ". U8 :' ' "'" " 15 .." 24 :32 70 :' .. J :j.... ." : : :.' / 'A'" 2~ rs ~8 :' ~...- ......... · ' .. .:..':... 0i:'.~!..30 .. .............. :': . · ' hrdII .: 21 25 ': 50 .:i i :::~"::"":::: ........ 14 ..'. EarthPulse i ising Tide of Concern ~','a levels are climbing . and people are in harm's way ~ oastal and island dwellers risk losing their {; homes, or even their lives, as a conssquence ~,,.,_,do~ rising oceans. [n the past centuO sea ','els climbed an average six inches--a figure that -c.'nls sma[[ but reflects a rate of increase ten times ~e average over the past 2,000 years. The world warming, causing seawater to expand and accel- rating the melting of mountain glaciers. Melting ,lar ice sheet~ could eventually add to the rise. Sea levels have fallen and risen over the millen- nia. At the peak of the Ice Age 20,000 years agn, average sea level was 400 feet lower. Even if the pollutants that contribute to temperature rise me reduced, the climb is expected to continue in the 21st century, hiking sea levels along with it. 'l he consequences: flooding, erosion, tainted drinking water, displaced popnlations, and lo,~s of farmland and biodiversity. How will Earth cope? 58°F In 2000 COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING · JETTIES · BULKHEADING · STEEL & WOOD PILING · FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET · RO. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 · (631) 477-1199/477-1393/477-0682 ° FAX (631) 477-0005 July 3, 2002 Town of Southold Trustees PO Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Mr. Al Krupski, President Re: James W. Miller Dear Mr. Kmpski: I have investigated and obtained additional helpful information through Map Tech that clearly shows photographs from chart #41072A47 clearly showing there has been no interference by Stott's dock or Macah's dock to the littoral dr/fi of sand near the proposed dock site for Mr. & Mrs. Miller. Also, you will see the most recent NOAA chart #12358 which I believe to be dated 1999 showing water depths are the same as several previous charts back as far as 1965, I believe this to be the newest chart available. Lastly, a topographical chart #41072A4A-024 shows the elevation of upland property along with the water depths along the shoreline which coincides with those of NO,aA. Respectfully, eric. JAC:lch cc: James Miller . CM/CV Ch 6 - Cedar Islan%a, Inc. C ce of Water Page I of 6 6. Cedar Island Marina, Inc. Marina Habitat Assessment and Scallop Farming Location: ]]Riverside Drive, P.O.Box 181, Clinton, CT 06413 ITe,ephooe: 11<860 669-8681, fan: <860 669-4157 lnterviewed:llJeffre)' Shapiro, President Owned b)': IIShapiro Famil}, Trusts Waterbod~': ]]Clinton Harbor, Long Island Sound Environmental change Ten years of private ecology research has demonstrated that recreational boat full- service marinas are productive artificial reefs and has led to the development of commercially,viahl~e bay scallop aquaculture under marina docks. The full-service marina, boatyard, and fish farm Cedar Island Marina is a family-owned business that calls itself "the family boating resort." It is a full-service marinafooatyard with 400 slips operating at 94% capacity in 1995, with many txanslent visitors filling slips vacated when homeport vessels are away. Three boats are year-round liveaboards. Boat sizes range from under 21 feet up to 120 feet, with 76% between 21 and 35 feet, and 19% longer, 35% are sailboats. Cedar Island has a staffof 25 year-round employees, which expands to 50 full- timers during the boating season. In addition to slips, the marina has retail services: ship's store, grocery, ice, bait/tackle, used boat brokerage, fuel dock, and pumpout. Launch/haulout is available with a 30-ton travel lift and "giraffe" crane for indoor and outdoor winter boat storage. Full repair services include fiberglass, hull, and engine repair; painting; sail rigging; sail making; welding/metal fabrication; and bottom cleaning. Located in Clinton Harbor, one of the f~w protected harbors (in southern New England) not burdened with indust~, the resort-like marina is 1 mile from the entrance buoy to Long Island Sound and borders the Hammonasset Nature Preserve. Its customer amenities include a laundry, 60-foot swimming pool, sauna, whirlpool, picnic grounds, saltwater beach, mack bar, 275-seat restaurant, poolside bands, night security, cable TV, and a children's activity director. On a busy summer weekend approximately 40% of the boats are in use, occupied, or under way out of the harbor, about 20% of the boats have people sleeping http ://www.epa.gov/nps/marinas/ch6. html 7/10/2002 CM/CV Ch 6 -- Ce.,Je~ 'Ts'e.',d Va.,4~ '"c. ""'"' ' ' ' overnil~,t. Within a 2-mile radius, there are 8 other marinas and boatyards with an estimate0 total boat population of 2,000. The prime boating season starts in May and ends m October. Cedar Island Marina was bought by the Shapiro fanfily in 1974 and everted from a fuel terminal built in 1964. Jeffrey Shapiro is also a general er in the Clinton Harbor Boat Show each July-another major focus of nfion, publicity, and potential customer draw to his marina. Management measures Cedar Island Marina complies with the marina management measures for water quality assessment and habitat assessment, as well as marina flushing, shoreline stabilization, storm water runoffcontrol, fueling station design, sewage facility. sewage facility maintenance, solid waste, liquid materials, petroleum control, and public education. Costs/benefits In 1995, Cedar Island Marina spent $38,500 to staff and operate its private marina research laboratory, including two full-time marine biologists. Its aquaculture project and pub!i_e ~isplay aquariums attracted new boating families into slips for the season and helped retain other customers, resulting in an estimated $46,000 gross slip income. The special docks designed by Cedar Island for the aquaculture project cost the company no more than conventional docks. Marina management estimates that the aquaculture project brings them around $5,000 worth of publicity each year and has extended their dredging season, saving another $5,000 annually. Environmental improvements When the State of Connecticut turned down Cedar Island Marina's request for an additional 396 slips in 1988 because the expansion would be "destroying valuable marina life and habitat," little did anyone realize what positive effects would result after Jeffrey Shapiro accepted the cbadlange. "We decided to prove Connecticut wrong because I was convinced that the marina would improve-not destroy-the harbor's h~bitat. So I begnn hiring environmental consultants to test what was happening in and under the marina waters here." That effort has turned into a full- time marina ecology research l~boratory with two full-time scientists. Thirteen techtlical reports were published and/or presented at professional estuafine, fisheries management, ~nd Lon8 Island Sound conferences between 1989 and 1995. · ~h removable center panel~, marine biologists check to growth of scallops in traps suspended beiow the Cedar Island Marina's floa~ing docl~. http ://www. epa.gov/np sdmarinas/ch6 html 7/10/2002 CM/CV Ch 6 -- Cedar ][nc. Page 3 of 6 The Cedar Island Marine Research Laboratory is entirely owned, operated, and funded as part of Cedar Island Marina. Its laboratory and in-water field station are also in the marina. Studies have included assessment and long-term monitoring of water quality (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen), marina habitat, coastal birds, and finfish communities (particularly juvenile winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in the marina, as compared to other natural habitats in Clinton Harbor. "Testing has proven that our marina's waters have good oxygen levels and lower coliform counts than those at the town beach. And heavy metals did not accumulate in scallops growing on the marina bottom," Jeffrey Shapiro stated. "Also the periwinkle snails-a favorite food of winter flounder-are 20 times more abundant on themn~rina's dredged bottom than on the neighboring mud flats, which helps explain why we have a 10-times larger population of baby flounder under our docks than elsewhere in the harbor." Studies in recent years-performed in cooperation with the marine laboratories of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), and Connecticut Sea Grant-have focused on the marina habitat with special emphasis on its finfish nursery and shellfish aquaculture potential. Noticing that many marine species grew more rapidly and remained healthy under marina docks and boats, Shapiro's lab staff started growing shellfish on trays suspended below the floating docks. Indeed, they grew faster than those placed in neighboring natural marsh fiats and were just as safe for human consumption. Oysters, it was determined, could be grown to market size I year quicker under boat docks than outside the marina basin. (Note: Cedar Island's reseamh under marina docks is consistent with that done by others on hard-shell clams in Rhode Island and finfish in Washington.) But twvo key factors inhibited use of marinas for oyster farming. First, U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards require the filter-feeding oysters to be relocated to "clean" waters for several months of deputation before being eaten, and that extra handling is costly. Second, oysters take 4 years to grow to market size. Shapiro switched to another shellfish-bay scallops-and seems to have solved those problems. In the spring of 1995, with some Connecticut Sea Grant funds and in-kind technical help from state and federal marine biologists, Cedar Island Marine Research Laboratory bought 6,000 baby bay scallops, each about the diameter ora http://www.epa.gov/nps/marinas/ch6.html 7/I 0/2002 CXVCV C~, 6 -- Ced~-~ 's~a',.,2 Va'4 '"¢. ~ ..... j ~c ,, pencil (mea:~ured as 1,000 per liter). The scallops were distributed inside plastic me,3h bags placed into three-level wire cages hung beneath special 60-ft floatin.u aquaculture docks designed and built by Cedar Island Marina. Deck trap doors open to ,allow access to each shellfish cage for easy removal. Every 4 weeks, each cage is pulled. The mesh bags are opened, and the scallops are counted, measured. lightly brushed to remove fouling growth, and separated into more bags, but with fewer scallops per bag to allow expanded growing space. By late September, all the scallops had grown to market size averaging 3 inches each. Asked what the mortality rate had been, research manager Matthew Mroczka answered, "l expected about a 30% death rate, but so far have lost 4-not percent-only 4 scallops, leaving 5,996 still alive and growing!" Aquaculture typically has higher survival rates than those in nature, often because of protection from predators, but Cedar Island's demonstration is truly remarkable. "Now for the good part of why scallops are better than oysters here," said Shapiro. "When most shellfish are eaten, we consume all the meat and stomach, including whatever the animal's last meals included. But we only eat the large muscle of the scallop with the stomach thrown away. So the concerns about water quality do not apply the same way for scallops. Second, the scallop lives only one year from seed to maturity. So producing shellfish for market is largely done during one boating season" "Today, each 3-in'c-h scallop retails at 50¢, so if we sold this year's crop, we would gross $3,000. However, because the seed, costing $72, was paid for with a federal grant, we will turn them over to the University of Connecticut. But we will keep some of the biggest ones (which grew fastest) to become our breeding stock for 1996. And we will expand the number of scallops and cages. We are happy with it," Shapiro said. "Next year we're going to make money on it in a business way. And each year we'll select our fastest-growing scallops as breeders for the next generation, much as farmers select their best seed and animals for breeding." "For 30 years there has been no commercial scallop fishery in the state. But within specially designed docks at Cedar Island Marina could be the seeds of a reborn commercial fishery."-The Hartford Courant, September 23, 1995. Other benefits Another clear business benefit derived from the lab work is that Cedar Island Marina is permitted to do its annual dredging, to maintain -8 feet MLW, during non-winter months. (All other marinas on Long Island Sound are limited to dredging in bitter cold months.) "Our environmental database, particularly the juvenile winter flounder data, helped convinced the state to extend our marina maintenance dredging season beyond the February I deadline to June 1, which gives a $5,000 cost saving by spot dredging in wanner weather." Aquaculture wire mesh tr~sps pre~tect scMlop seed from predaors http ://www. epa.gov/nps/marinas/ch6.html 7/10/2002 C~,LC\ Ch 6 -- ( Inc. Page 5 of 6 hold multi-h'veb; cJ'trlo'v This unusual marine research laboratory, owned and operated by a private commercial full-service marina, is unique in the world. Shapiro admits that it is unlikely that most other marinas could afford such a sustained scientific effort. "I learned that it was more cost-effective to hire full-time biologists rather than hiring consultants at $100 per hour. We've been spending over $30,000 annually for 5 to 6 years, and are now only really starting to see a [business] return." But the Cedar Island Marine Research Laboratory's published reports will benefit the entire marina industry internationally for many years. To demonstrate the marine life diversity in the boating facility, the lab staff stocks and maintains a 400-gallon saltwater aquarium in the marina office. It is a major attraction for chitd,en and parents. "Many boats arrive for fuel and pumpout at Cedar Island's dock just so the kids can run to the office to see the aquarium with all that stuffliving under their docks," Shapiro said proudly. "We set up a large marine touch tank during the Clinton Harbor Boat Show in late July. There were 5.000 people visiting the show, and our tank was the biggest attraction in the exhibit. It really impacts boater behavior not to throw trash or oil overboard. It also attracts visitors who heard about our aquarium. We get a chance to educate people about our environment." "We got a $3,000 pumpout grant to add a second portable pump and 250-gallon holding tank for our fuel dock," Shapiro said. "We use a large 3-inch-diameter diaphragm pump and hose to give us greater suction and faster speed. We charge $5.00 for a pumpout done by our dockhands, but it is free for our slip renters. As a staff incentive, at the end of the season each year I recognize the staff member who did the most pumpouts with a personalized 'Pumpout King Award' and his/her name added to the plaque hanging in the fuel dock office. I started this in 1989 at the suggestion of two dock boys who were competing to get the most pumpouts that summer. The winner that year is listed first, then the other returned in 1990 determined to win-and he did-so his name is second. They like the competition." Asking every boat at the fuel dock to have a pumpout is part of the staff's written job description. Also at the fuel dock, "An oil absorption boom, attached to a painter extension pole, lays on one end of the dock. Whenever a small spill occurs during fueling, the dockhand grabs the pole and pulls the 30-foot boom over the petroleum and moves it around until all the spill is absorbed, much like a mop would." Waste oil and batteries are collected at the service area for recycling. This gives h ttp:,//u,a,,rw, epa.gov/nps/marinas/ch6, html 7,/10/2002 C\'xCV C', 6 -- Ceda~ 's'~.',d V~.-' '"c. ~' ....... ' - pec.l:,le a convenient place to bring their used oil, instead of throwing it into the durnpster ,or or the ground. Gr~vel permeable parking and work areas help control runoff pollution Landscaping in the public areas around the stores, pool, and restaurant makes a nice. clean mm-ina atmosphere for boaters. ~ )fl'~ce ~fWetlan. d~()ceans & Watersheds Home I Water_she_d_ Protcctmn [!omc ht tp ://ww~'.epa.gov/owow/NP S/marinas./ch6. html This page la~ updated October 4, 1999 hnp://www.epa.gov/nps/marinas/ch&html 7/10/2002 Z Z Z 72o 26' O"W 72* 25' 72° 24' 0" W 72* 23' 0" ~ Z ~I'Oc N'mCK Chart Name: ~h~rf 11'3. NY LI SHELTER ISLAND SOUND AND PECONIC BAYS · I '"2 "~ ~ R '1 72v 24' 30" W 72" 24' 0" W 72~ 23' 30" W 72' 23' O" W 72~ 22' 30" W Z ) Z 5 / : / a~ · Chart Name: SOUTHOLD 41072A4A-024 Albert J. Krupski, President "Jam~s King, Vice-President Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 May 9, 2002 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern that you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: James Miller Requested Action: Construct 6'X40' ramp, 6'Xl10' dock and 0'X24' "L" dock pointing northeast. From the "L" dock, installing a 32"X12' ramp leading to a 0'X20' float. Installing a 15,000 lb. boat lift on the southeast side. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X) Unlisted Contact Person: ~f'~"'~ 9' /~--'l~-i~'"'~' ~' (631) 765-1892 Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (ELS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. If no response is received from you, it will be assumed that there is no objection to the Board of Trustees assuming lead agency status. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, Albert Krupski, Jr. President CC: Army Corp. of Engineers Dept. of State DEC (*Maps are enclosed for your review) · ' 14-16-2 617,20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full £AF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significanL The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- Iy. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of inform·lion to fit a project or a~:tion. I:ull EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on Identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project ~)r action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact The form also identifies whether an imp·ct can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any imp·ct in Part 2 is identified as potenti·l¥1·rge, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the imp·ct is actually important DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identity the Portions of EAF comp.leted for this project: I-I Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon revieW of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate~, and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: C] A. The project will not result in any large and imporl~ant impact(s) and, .therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore · negative declaration will be prepared. [3 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t~e mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be I~epare~* C. The project may result in one or more lasge and important Impacts that may have a s!gnificant impact on the environment, therefore a podtlve declaration will be prepared. · A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Hame of Lead Agency Print (x TYI~ Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If diff'erent from responsible officer) Date 1 PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant efiect on the enviroqment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide an,/additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will J>e dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and Specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF~,(~I'ION O, nolude~tree! Address, Munl~olpafJJy and Co~m~. y) ~ I I USINESS TELEPHONE ' I '4"1'7 - I ldlq Iq Y [ c°°E · [ BOSlN~TELEPHONE Pie~ Complete Ea~ Qu~lon-Indi~te N~, If ~t appli~ble ~ $ite Desodption PhWI~I se~g of overall pmj~ ~' d~lo~ ~ u~ a~. 1. Preset land use: ~0~an O[~us~al OC~merclal OForest O~ricultum 2. Total acreage of proj~ area: ~. ~ acres. APPROXI~TE ACREAGE Mea~w or Bmshland (No~agricultural) Forest~ Agricultural (Includes ~chards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater ~ tidal as ~r A~icl~ 24, 25 of ECL) Water SuEace Area Unvegetat~ (Rock, each or fill) Roads, buildings a~ other pav~ su~aces Other (Indicate ty~) 3. What Is pr~omlnant soil ~s) on project site~ a. SoU drainage: ~ell drai~ ~ of site 'OP~Iy drai~ ~ of site /~'Residentlai (suburban) I-IRural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION C)Moderatel¥ well drained ._ % of site b. If any agricultu[al land ts iiwolvFI, how many acres of soil are classified within soil 8roup I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification SystemT t41~ acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on proj~ect slte~ (lYes '!~o a. What is depth to bedrockt' Id/~ (in feet) t ~. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes.: ~0-10% % [310-15% _ % [~15% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-lYes 7. ts project substantially contiguous to a siteIlisted on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [3Yes ~i~CNo 8. What is the depth of the water table~' ~J~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a prir~ary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [3Yes '4~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [3Yes C}No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as th['eatened or endangered? [3Yes .J~LNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or [3Yes po unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Describe 13. Is the project sit%,presentiy used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreatioh area/ I-lyes ~[blo . If yes. explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? [3Yes 15. Streams within or contiguous to project, area: ~te, l~l~_ a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities~' I-lyes '~No a) if Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow ¢onnectioni' [3Yes I-INo b) If Yes, will improyements be necessary to allow connection? [3Yes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? C]Yes '~o 19. h: the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I-lYes ~3~1o ' 20, Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes[' B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of prolect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: I, JIL. acre's initially; NIL- acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: Jd!/~ (If appropriate). e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed FJ1/~ , %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ~.~.~_~; proposed ~J!A . g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~ ! A · (upon' completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially I -- ~ ~' Ultimately I - -' ~ I. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ height;. . width; · length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ~ fL 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes UNo ON/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? C]Yes '~lNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees. shrubs, ground covers) will be removed-from site? ' ~ acres. S. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes 1~f4o 6, If single phase proiect: Anticipated period of construction C~ I~f~-~ n~, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: FllA a. Total number of phases anticipated b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? g. Will blasting occur during construction? ' OYes ~No 9. Number'of jobs generated: during construction hJl~ , 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project Iq!A . 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? tons/cubic yards (number). month year, (including demolitionJ. month year. r OYes I-INo ; after project is complete N! A OYes ]~[No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes l~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved~ OYes '~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal~ Explain OYes' ,,~o 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain~' E]Yes 16. Will the project 8enerate solid waste~ ' [:]Yes ~No a. If yes. what is the amount per month, tons b. If yes, will an existing 'solid waste facility be used? OYes I-INo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain OYes ONo 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid wastet' a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life~ 1§, Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [:]Yes byes J~No tons/month. years. 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? C]Yes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use~ C3Yes If yes , indicate type(s) 22. if water supply Is from wells, indicate pumping capacity ~l~ gallons/minute. anticipated water usage per day ~J!h ' gallons/day. 23. Total 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fundin8~ OYes '~No If Yes. explain 4 2S. Approva{s Required: City. Town. Village Board BYes I~lNo City. Town, Village Planning Board C)Yes C)No City. Town Zoning Board OYes City, County Health Department I-lYes C]No Other Local Agencies OYes liNo Other Regional Agencies.' DYes C]No State Agencies ]~ilYes C)No Federal Agencies l~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Type Submittal Date 1. Does proposed, action involve a planning or zoning decision? OYes ~blo · If Yes, indicate decision required: C]zoning amendment I-Izoning variance C)special use permit nsubdivision C]site plan Clnew/revision of master plan I-Iresource man?geme~t plan EJother f~-~J/t41 n 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~¥tV~LI1~ .5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~'es linc) 7. What are the predominant~ land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~,~ mile radius of proposed action? I 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjolnlng/surroundin~ land uses within a 1/, mile? ,,~es I-INo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land~ how many lots are proposed? I~J A a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require ~ny authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? I-lyes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Ryes I-INo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? (3Yes' a. If yes, is the existing road netwod~ adequate to handle the additional traffic? r'lYes C]No D. Intormational Details Attach any additional information as ma? be needed to clarify your projecL If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. F- Verification I certify that the information provided above is true t¢~ the best of my knowledge. with ~is ~ment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do nos constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, c~nsider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read r, arefully) et. Answer each of the 20 questions In PART 2. Answer Yes If there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then cheek the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size ot the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Idee{Ifylng that an Impact will be potentially large (oolumn 2) does not mean that It Is also necessarily slgnlllcant, Any large Impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an Impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. It reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then oonslder the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mltlgated by change(s) In the proJeot to a small to moderate Impact, also cheek the Yes box In column 3. A-No response Indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change t.o the project site? IqNO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise par 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feeL · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally'within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that wiU continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sltet' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)C]NO CIYES · .Specific land forms:. I 2 3 Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impaot ProJect Change [] [] OYes C]No [] [] []Yes [~No [] [] OYes []No [] O OYes [~No [] [] OYes [] [] Oyes []~o ~ ~ ~es ~o 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected~' (Under Articles '15, 24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water~' riND ' OYES Example~ that would apply to column 2' · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a '10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body o.f water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity;t riND I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adve~ely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have Inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water end/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of ekisting waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other Impact~: . 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff~ C]NO FqYES Examples that would al~ply to column 2 · Proposed Actio~ would change flood water flows. ? I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact impact Project Change 0 0 OYes [:)No O [] · OYes ONo [] [] OYes []]No [] [] OYes OHo O [] Oyes O~o 0 O OYes n~o [] [] OYes Oi~o 0 0 []Yes ~o 0 ~ OYes 0 ~ O~es ~o 0 0 OYes ~o 0 ~ []Yes ~o 0 ~ Dyes ~o 0 0 3Yes ~o 0 0 OYes O ~ DYes 0.o 0 ~ Oyes 0 0 []Yes 0 0 []Yes Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR · Will proposed action affect air quality? ON• OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source produclng more than.10 million BTU's per hour. Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered spocies~' ONO I-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal lisL using the site, over or near site ot found on the site. Removal of any portion of a critical or significant ~ildlife habitaL Applic~on of pesticide or herbicide more than ~wice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. O(her impacts: Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species~' I-INO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action would substantially Interfere with any resident or migrator~' fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres >f mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES · Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~ [:]NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture: vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 Small to Moderale Impact [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] 2 Potential Large impact O 0 O [] [] [] [] 0 O. [] O 0 [] [] 0 Can Im pact-~Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes ON• 1 OYes []~o []Yes []No OYes []No []Yes ON• OYes ON• []Yes ON• []Yes l-IN• OYes ON• []Yes ONo DYes []No OYes ONo []Yes I'"lNo []Yes ON• OYes •No Dyes · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~' ON• I-lYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contras~ to current surrounding land use patterns, whether. man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleoc~tological importance~' ON• f'IyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Pmpo/~d Action occutring wholly or partially within or substantially couflguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as .sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunitlest Examples that would apply to column 2 ON• nYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an op]en space important to the community. · Other Impacts: 9 i 2 Small to Potential Can Impac Moderate Large Mitigated Impact Impact Project Ch [] 0 OYes l- O [] OYes E [] [] OYes C O [] OYes 0 [] [] []Yes O [] [] []Yes [] 0 [] OYes [] O O OYes 0 O [] OYes [] O 0 OYes 0 O O OYes [] O O OYes [] O [] [:]Yes O O [] OYes [] n~. ~N. IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 4. W'ill Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? DNO DYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CEA. 1 Small Io Moderate Impact Poter~tial Impact B'~e Large Mitigated 13), Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? Proposed Action will impact the use. function or enjoyment of the resource? Other impacts: 0 [] 0 O [] OYes I~No [] []Yes E]No 0 [:]Yes [r-I No O E]Yes [] []]]Yes ONo IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION J. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? · BNO D-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. Proposed Action will result in major traffiC: problems. Other impacts: [] O 0 OYes nNo ~]Yes ONo OYes E]No IMPACT ON ENERGY Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [~NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in th~ use of any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: [] O []Yes [] [] OYes 10 NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO IE]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital school or other sensitive facility. · Odors wil[ occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety~' ONO' OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 *. Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) * Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 fe~t of a site used for the disposal of solid or. hazardous waste. · Other impact~: IMPACT ON GROWTH ANp CHARAgTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing communlty~ · ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the prolect b located b likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than S% per year as a result of this projecL · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. * Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. * Other impacts: I 2 ~ ----- Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 O []yes ONo [] [] []Yes []No 0 [] E-)Yes ONo [] [] []Yes []No [] O OYes [] [] OYes [] [] OYes ONo [] O OYes [] [] OYes [] O OYes [~ O OYes nHo ~ ~ OYes ~ 0 OYes 0~o ~ 0 OYes ~ ~ OYes ~ 0 OYes ~.o ~ ~ OYes ~ 0 OY~ ~ ~ OYes 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental Impacts[ ONO OYES Il any ~ Iff Pl~t 2 Is Identified as m potential large Impact or II you cannel determine the magnitude of Impaol~ proceed lo Fad 3 11 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency ~art 3 mu~! be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be nltisated. nstructlons Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: · Briefly describe the impact. ! .. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). :. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its i~:reversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether.the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence ~f the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · ' Whethe~ known objections to'the proje~:t relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 ,,.,,.. (9,~-9c 6 ] 7.20 SEQR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form .may be used to provide additional information relating to Question ] I of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observatloj~, enjoymen{, and appreclatlon of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the Hatlonal or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · Hationa) Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · Hail•hal Hatural Landi~arks and other outstanding natural features? · Hatlonal Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as Hatlonal or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such as part of the interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or deslgnated interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · t4unlcipal park, or designated open space? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-'/4 V,-V2 V2-3 3-5 5 + [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] O [] [] [] [] O' [] -[] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] O 0 [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] 0 n [] [] [] [] [] [] [] n [] [] [] 0 Is the visibility of the proJect seasonal? (Lc,, screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) []Yes OHo Are any of the resources checked In question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? OYes i'qUo DESCRIPTIOH OF EXISTING VISU^L EHVIROHF~EHT From each item checked in question l, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *IA mile * ! mile Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested [] [] Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] .Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] - mat [] [] /V[oufltalnous [] [] Other [] [] NO'I'E: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *~ mile I'-JYes [-INo *I miles r-]Yes '2 miles f-lyes C]No *3 miles I-lyes r-lNo * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is HOTE: When user data is urmvailable or unknown, use best estimate. COHTEXT 7. The situation or activity In which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proPOsed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved in recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At workslte Other ' FREQUENCY Holidays/ Dally Weekly Weekends Seasonally [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 'J PROJECTLD. NUMSER I 617.2o SEQR Appendix C Slate Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Appllcanl or Project sponsor) ~ A PLICANT PON O . 2. PROJECT NAME DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: ~ OF ~D~F~E~ 8. Y~LL PtROPO~ED ACTION OOMPI. Y WITH EXtb*;TING ZONING OR OTHER EXI.~'IHG LAND USE RESTRIG'T1ONS? No I! No, desc~tb~ briefly g. WHAT I~ PRESEKrT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJEGtT I CE~llFY THAT THE INFORMA11OH PROVIOED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI. Fd)QE )4 - , Il the action Is In the Coastal Area, and' you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT L. u be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.47 U yes. coO~d~nale Ihs feY,aw process and u~.e Ihs FULL EAF ~ C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS A~OCIATED ~qTH THE FOLLOWING: (Answecs may be handwritten, il legible) C3. vegetation of launa, fish, shellfish or wiicllife species, signllicanl habitals, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briery' Long term, shofl term. cumulative, o~ ofhe~ effects no{ identified in CI-C~? Explain briefly. D. WILL THE PROJEOT HAVE AN IMPACT OH THE ENVIRONMENTAL C~-IARACTERlallCS THAT CAILI~EC THE E~TABUSHMENT OF A CEA? fly,, ONo tc IS THERE, OR I~ THERE LIKELY TO BF. CONTROVERSY RELATED 1"O POTEN'riAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? [] Yes [--] NO I( Yes, explain I~lefty PART Ill--DETERMINATION OF $1QNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INb"TRUCTION$: Fo~' each edyerse effect identified above, detem~lne wflethef II is substantial, large, important o~ otherwise sl~nlflcafll. Each effect should be sessese<l Iff connection with Its (a} setting (i.e. ufbafl o~' rural); {b) probability gl eccufring; (o) duration; {d) Inevere, lbitlt).; (e) geographic scope; and (I) m~gnituds. If neoesele/, add attaohments o~ reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations eontath sufficient detail to ~ that all relevant adverse Impanls have been Identified and a~equately addressed, if quastIo~ Duf Part II was checked yes, the ddtefmlnatlon and significance'must eYaluate the potential Impact of the proposed a~ticn off the emdronmental e_.hamcteflstics of the CEA. [] Check this box If you hav~ Id;~ntlfle~ one of more potentially large or significant adverse Impacts which MAY ocour. Then proceed directly to the FULL FAF and/o~ prepare a positive deeJaration. [] Check this box If you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In any significant adverse environmental Impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportlng this determination: Board of Trustees 9 July 30, 1997 yielding approx. 15 c.y. of spoil. Located: 940 Tarpon Drive Southold. SCTM #57-1-10 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Anyone here would like to speak in favor of the application? JIM FITZERGALD: Again its all there in the application and I don't have anything to add. Be happy to answer your questions. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. We have notes from the CAC that recommen~ approval with provisions. The question is whether the full scope of the project is necessary whether it could be downsized as far as the dredging and floats go and whether also ..... something just came to my mind, the dredge spoil site is on the application. JAMES FITZGERALn: The dredge spoil would be used as back fill, for clay material that is behind the bulkhead now would be excavated and disposed of be replaced with the dredge material and the balance of the material would be (Can't understand rest of sentence). TRUSTEE KRUSKI: Any other questions? Does anyone have any comment on this application? TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: We talked about a 10' nonturf buffer. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Nonturf buffer with the applicant at our field inspection. MR. FITZGERALD: The applicant said yes and along the bulkhead and the area that was disturbed which is almost the whole length and we spoke which was ever appropriate for him. Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE GAP~.T.: So moved. TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES TRUSTEE HOLZAPFEL: I'll make a motion that we approved the application of MICHAEL DI LEONE to replace 1 16' section of the bulkhead in condenplate with 40' section add a 4' X 6' platform attached to the bulkhead and a 4' X 16' ramp 2 5' X 20' floats dredging area approximately 4' X ~5' 4' a depth of 4' below ALW and with the stipulation of there would be a 10' buffer along the new bulkhead replace bulkhead. TRUSTE~ KING: Second. ALL AYES. 10. Proper-T Services on behalf of~ a Wetland Permit to install a metal s~ platform situated over the end of an existing wooden groin on his property, one or two feet above ordinary high water supported by 4 to 6 piles. Located: 1610 Paradise Point Landing, Southold SCTM %81-3-19.4 TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of the application? JAMES FITZGEP~ALD: I represent Mr. Miller and if there is any questions I'm here to help in the application. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone else who would like to speak either on behalf of or against the application? ANN SMITH: I would like to speak against the application. My name is ANN SMITH and I'm a southern property owner of MR. MILLER'S. Not an immediate property owner about two properties down. My sister and I Ruth Meyer own property and we feel that this sculpture which I believe which was described in the Board of Trustees 11 July 30, 1997 property." Isn't the tie line for that property.., is at the bulkhead right? So that beach is public property? JAMES FITZGEP3~LD: The groin is not far beyond his property the end of the groin is on state property. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: I thought from the survey .... maybe I misread it .... this is the bulkhead where the concrete wall and that's the tie line isn't it? JAMES FITZGERALD: Yes. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: So that the beach~ itself is not their property correct? JAMES FITZGERALD: It would appear that way. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: Okay. I just wante~ to clarify that. JAMES FITZG~: Although it doesn't say property line it shows it the correspondence in the baring. TRUSTEE GARi~ELL: So that's not their property? JAMES FITZGERALd: No it's the state's property. TRUSTEE Ki~U~SKI: The board is able to get past the sculpture for what it is and try focus on on the use of public property. I think that is the issue here and when you get into use of public property this is an unconventional use but is it anymore unusual then someone putting a dock out in front of their property on state property to moor a boat. It's a structure for the applicant's enjoyment. TRUSTEE GAR~ELL: The difficulty I have in concept A1 though is that a dock is largely two dimensional and squat. This is a vertical and you know I'm thinking of all the arg~uments that I hear about microwave towers and phone co~uL,~nications towers and wind generators and it's the vertical problem. It's not how .much bottom it sits on that's what bothers people to worry/ TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: When you went out there what advantage point did you look at it from? TRUSTEE C~kR~.L: I was looking at the pictures to scale. JAMES FITZGEP~ALD: Can I just point out that with regard to the height of the sculpture which is 35' the height of the plug in that area is 25' above mean low water so that the sculpture is certainly not higher than any of the trees that are on the bluff. And viewed from the bluff it's not gonna look like it's sticking up in the air. And just in passing the.., and only for the boards information in reference, the Towns Zoning Code exempts monuments, if you will, from height restrictions. TRUSTEE WENCZEL: I would just like to make one point. This application is for a Wetlands Permit and when we issue a Wetlands Permit the code gives us a number of specific standards which we have to utilized when we evaluate whether or not the Wetlands Permit is appropriate and I'd just like to confirm by this information read what those standards are. It says here that the trustees may adopt a resolutio~ ~recting the iss~sce of a permit to perform operations applied for only if it determines that such operations will not substantially a. adversely effect the wetlands of the Town. b. Cause damage from erosion terbidity or siltation, c. Cause saltwater intrusions into the freshwater resources of the Town, d. adversey d. Adversely effect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organism aquatic wildlife and vegetation of the natural Board of Trustees 13 July 30, 1997 how you can stop something like this on the basis of health and safety and welfare of the town. I mean Leon Brennan couldn't step out and do that. But I'm just kind of ruminating. I'm just kind of telling people what's going through my head right now. TRUSTEE ~_RU~SKI: One comment please brief. ~ MILLER: I certainly advised because m~ father is a developer on the application but it is very interesting to listen to you sir. I recently read an article about sculpture and one in particular was constructed over 100 years ago and it was the most instrumental in creating derision in this community. Not this community, in this particular c~lL~nity where the bulkhead was built. So m~ny people were opposed to this horrid structure which actually happened to be made of steel as well. ~nd that structure wound up being the Eiffel Tower. And so many people today lacking in the aesthetic benefit, had people who thought that obtrusive tall structure was something so agast that it should never be constructed. It just counter balanced of what you are saying and I not sure anyone here has the foresight to determine what it is and what is not art. TRUSTEE GAR~k~.~: Yes. A good point. The Eiffel Tower... wasn't that in connection with the great world exposition, the Paris World Exposition? MR. MILLER: Yes. Around the 1900's. TRUSTEE GARi~ELL: I have one more question. Could you just tell me a little more about the Basand or Roberto Julio Bassand the sculpture? MARK MILLEI~: Roberto was was born on Long Island and created some are work here on Long Islan~ and is presently an artisan resident in Japan and he is under commission now to build an entire park filled with his large structures and that is what he does for a living and I was able to acquire this piece of art work where it was originally over in Port Jefferson and I believe it is extremely beautiful. I believe extremely environmentally sensitive and a statement that the people in Southold believe the bay belongs to the heron. TRUSTEE F~RUPSKI: Any other brief cu~%~ent? Do I have a motion to close the hearing? TRUSTEE.HOLZA~'~: So moved. TRUSTEE: GARi~ELL: Second. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: All in favor. ALL AYES. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Want to make a motion? I'll make a motion to approve the application of JAMES MILnRR. TRUSTEE KING: Second. ALL AYES. 11. J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of '~ requests a Wetland Permit to construct a 6' X ~- float to~ existing catwalk, ramp and float. NOTE: Applicant wishes to revise plans to show that the proposed float has been relocated so that it shall not be located any further seaward than the existing dock. Located: 5675 Skunk La., Cutchoque, telephone pole #50-5. SCTM #138-2-10 p/o 19 TRUSTEE Ki~UPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of the application? ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATIST[CS' MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT Oi~FICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION I. (Department or Officer, if known, that ~the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record so, ught. If possible, date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) supply Signature of Applicant: ~,,~r,~r'~.~ ~~ Mailing Address (if different from above): · e,e hone [ ] APPROVED Elizabeth A. Neville Freedom of Information Officer [ ] DENIED* * If delayed or denied see reverse ~ide for explanation. RECEIVED UA¥ 1 2002 Date Southold_Town Clerk SEQRA RESOLUTION RE: JAMES MILLER SCTM#8'1-3-19.4 Resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold that the application of JAMES MILLER, more full described in the public hearing section # of the Trustee agenda dated Wednesday, April 24, 2002 is, pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations, an Unlisted Action; and be it Further resolved that the applicant is required to submit a Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF); and be it Further resolved that upon receipt of the LEAF the Clerk of the Trustees is hereby directed to commence a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA. Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hall. 5;~095 ~n P,~ad P.O. Box 1179 Sow. hold, New York 11971 SOU~HOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Thursday, April 16, 2002, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Scott Hilary, seconded by Melvyn Morris, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Permit Application of JAMES MILLER to construct a 6'X 40' ramp continuing with a level 6'X 110' dock and ending with a 6'X 24' "L" dock pointing northeast. From the "L" dock, installing a 32"X 12' ramp leading to a 6'X 20' float, and install a 15,000 lb. boat lift on the southwest side. Located: 1610 Paradise Point Rd., Southold. SCTM#81-3-19.4 The CAC recommends Disapproval of the application because of the following reasons: The proposed structure would be fragmenting the environment. It would limit the public access from both beach and water. The project is lacking soundings. The structure would impede navigation and a potential navigation hazard. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried I00~ PI~E pAI~E ~ bY~ CO~TF-.LLO IV~AEINF- CONTEACTIN~ COl[Ff. RO. ~OX 21~,4.- GI[EENPOIN"T; N"( II'a~alr'ar SHEET ~_ OF 4- AMHW'--r/~ A/~LW F~# O~C, KI N~ DOCI4 DETAIL FLOA~ATION FLOAT PETAl L C05-rF-.LLO IVlARINE ¢ONTRACTIN~ COP..P. G~I- 4:'/'-f- I dAME~ MILLER. · 558 ~DWA~.D~ AVE. (1~10 PARADI.~ E . ~JAN. 19~ MAI~. ~., ~HI~ET ~ Of: 4- (D VICIN ITY NAAi LOCATION 0 ~'00' ^0~J^G~NT PI~OF~TY OWNEI~: (!) OOH~ ~ UOA~J PETI~0Cr--LI..I HUNTIN~TON~ NY 1174-~ ® II~OE2EET GILBERT 14eD PAEAOI"~E 50UTH01..D~ NY 1197l - 510~ OC,AI'I 0N PffiOPO~EO: CON~.TIe. UCTIN~ A G~x40~ I~Ak4~ CONTII'.,IUINO WITH A LEVEL G'x IIO' DOCK AN0 E~OlN~ WITH A ~ ~ ~ "L". DOCK ~OI~TIN~ NO~THEA~ ~M THE ~b~' DOCK/ INOTALLIN~ A ~["x i[~ EAMP LEADIN~ T0A ~x~O' PLOA~ INSTALLIN~ A 15/0OO L~. ~T LIFT ON THE 50~HWE~T ~IDE. ~Y WATEr/ U~ING C~ANE/~A~eE PREPARED CO.TELL0 M^J~.INE CONTEACTINO ,JAN. I~, ~OO~ SHEET I OF zl.- ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS bL~NAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516)' 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOYVN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom of: Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION I. To: ' OV -f/ VCO 'f a... -T4 U S (Department or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* EIi~Oeth A. Neville - Freedom of InfOrmation Officer [ ] DENIED* * If delayed or cleflJed see reverse side for expl~rmtim~. RECEIVED DEC 18 at Southola ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS MARRIAGE OFFICER RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER FREEDOM OF INFC~RMATION OFFICER Town Hall, 53095 Main Road PO. Box 1179 SouLhold, New York 11971 Fax (516') 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765-1800 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TO'tN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC ACCESS TO RECORDS INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete Section I of this form and give to Town Clerk's Office (agency Freedom o.f Information Officer). One copy will be returned to you in response to your request, or as an interim response. SECTION I. (De or Officer, if known, that has the information you are requesting.) RECORD YOU WISH TO INSPECT: (Describe the record sought. If possible, supply date, file title, tax map number, and any other pertinent information.) Signature of Applicant~-~ erlkted Name: ~/~/P,~ /~'~/- .~(~.. L[~(~ Mailing Address (/;ifferent from above):~ Telephone Number~ ~~Date: //~~ RECEIVED [ ] APPROVED [ ] APPROVED WITH DELAY* beth A. Neville Freedom of InfOrmation Officer [ ] DENIED* DEC 3 Southold Town Clerk Date * If delayed or denied see reverse side for explanatkm. US Army Corps of Engineers New York District Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, N.Y. 10278-0090 A'I-FN: Regulatory Branch PUBLIC NOTICE In replying rear to: Public Notice Number: Issue Date: Expiration Date: 2002-00347-L2 December 10, 2002 January 9, 2003 To Whom It May Concern: The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 403). APPLICANT: ACTIVITY: James Miller 538 Edwards Avenue Calverton, NY 11933 ¢. Construct a Pier Assembly, Wavebreak Curtain, and Dolphins WATERWAY: Shelter Island Sound LOCATION: Town of Southold, Suffolk Coumy, New York. A detailed description ant! plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public imerest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevam to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and,in general 'the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WRITING AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise, it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. Any person may request, in writing, before this public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered jnst as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. CE\'AN-©..'?-5'~ PIZBLIC NOTICE NO. 2002-00347-L2 Our preliminary d,::ermination is that the activity for which authorization is sought herein is nor likely to affect an>' Federall5 endanger{.d ~r threatened species or their critical habitat. However, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species ~ct (16 U :;.C. 1531), the District Engineer is consulting with the appropriate Federal agency to determine the presence of and potential impacts to listed species in the project area or their critical habitat. The Magnuson-Ste~ens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 10~--267), requires all federal agencies to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on all actions, c r proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habttat (I~iFH). A complete description of the project is given in the attached Work Description. The District Engineer has m,.de the preliminary determination that the site-specific adverse effects are not likely to not be substanti~.l. Furthe:' consultation witl~ NMFS regarding EFH impacts and conservation recommendations is being conductec[ and will be concluded prior to the final decision. Based upon a review cf the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no 'known sites eligible for, or included in, the Register within the permit area. Presently unknown archeological, scientific. prehistorical, or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit. Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)], for activities under considt r~tion that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has a federally approved coastal zone management progr~[m, the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with, and will be conducted in a .harmer that is consistent with, the approved state coastal zone management program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision wilt be made until one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from the Consistency Ceordinator, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone Management Progra~n, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone (518) 474-6000. Comments regarding the applicant's certific~ttion, and copies of any letters to this office commenting upon this proposal,'should be so addressed. In addition to any required water quality certii~cate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental authorization for the activity under consideration: · New York State Department of Enviromnental Conservation Permit · Town of Southold It is requested that you :ornmunicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you have any questions concerning this application. you may contact this office at (212) 264-6730 and ask for Mary Ann Miller. For more informario:n on New York District Corps of Engineers programs, visit our website at http://www.nan.usac{:.army.mil FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: Enclosures _xichard L. Tomer hief, Regulatory Branch CENAN-OP-RE PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 2002-00347-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, James Miller, has requested Department of the Army authorization to construct a pier assembly and a wave break and to install dolphins. The site is in Shelter Island Sound at the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The work would involve construction of a 4' by 40' ramp, a 4' by 40' fixed timber pier, a 6' by 70' fixed timber pier, and a 6' by 24' pier, in an "L" configuration, with a 30' long wavebreak curtain elevated a minimum of 2 feet above the bottom. Within the "L", a 2.8' by 12' seasonal ramp and a 6' by 20' seasonal float would be installed. The work would also involve installation of two (2) three-pile dolphins spaced 40' apart and located 25' from the 70' by 6' proposed pier on its south side. The stated purpose of this project is to provide mooring for applicant's vessel(s). The project would impact approximately 0.02 acres of Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for all life stages of Winter Flounder (Pleuronectes americanus), Windowpane Flounder (Scopthalmus aquosus), and Red Hake (Urophycis chuss), as well as juvenile and adult stages of Summer Flounder (Paralicthys dematus). Habitat at the site may be described as sandy-bottom substrate. The species listed prey upon small benthic invertebrates, such as crustaceans, polychaetes, shrimp, and mollusks, in addition to other suspended microscopic invertebrates. Pile driving for the piers may affect reproduction and feeding success, but this would be temporary and limited to the immediate area. Installation of the wavebreak would not have an affect on the substrate as the bottom of the wavebreak will be approximately two feet above the sea floor. Turbidity and' mechanical structures associated with construction may impact feeding of juveniles and adults, but populations present at the time of construction will likely flee to waters where disturbances are fewer. This project .should minimally impact reproductive and feeding success of the aforementioned species. Furthermore, the proposed structures may act as attachment surfaces for encrusting organisms, which could increase the forage base at the site and provide additional ecological functions. 3 72o 24' 0',W 72o 23' 0"W 72° 22' 0" W Char[ Name: Char[ ID: Top Left: Bo:om Ri,uh~: 68 NY LI SHELTER ISLAND SOUND AND PECONIC BAYS 12358 1 41° 5' ~8" N 72° 27' 6" W 40° 59' 57' N 72o 21, 19-W 72' 22' 0" W ~ ® MAPTECH. rNC. ~H~TF ~ OF ~ PI CE APPI..I CANT ~ ,JAME~ M I Li/EI~. 5'5e,. E 0WAmI~ I°P-EI~AIi[EU I~¥: '-' CAI_VF.P..T0kI,i 14'I' I'l°JS~ C05TIEL. LO IVlAW. II'4E COI,4TI~A~TING COI~I~. ('1~.10 PA ..I~I~ISE ~ ~.o.'~o~, ~[~4- ~e~Po,~, ~¥ tl~,~,4. ' '[ '0"'- ?_. - [ G,,~iJ,4.77 o~_~ ' -' ,.JAN. oj~, ~.0 ~' AUG. 5,~'OO l I - ..,, ' J~Alt. g~ ~OOP,.,.'. I [ ' ' -. ' ;. MAe.,~t -o0~.:'".' I ~ ..: .. .~HEET ~ OF ~, FLOAT ¢ P.O,~O ..~P_.CTION~u +e. 5~ x ~'~' PILE A PPIlC~AINIT: ~IAME~ SHEET ~ oF ~ +~.0 jo'~ ,J AI,,,I E~, M I L-L.E~R. CAL.V~..i~."I"'ON~. 1',3y I I::)OC.I~ [~F-.T^I L ~- PR E.l°,~, R.F.J::) .~ APP/I (1(~10 PAIR.AJ~I...~,~: ~ RD.] AU~. '~,, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U,S. ARMY ENGIlu~=~ Distr..aCT ~ YORK JACOB K.. YORK, NY. OFFICIAL BUSINESS PE~M.TY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN HALL 53095 MAIN ROAD PO BOX 728 SOUTHOLD NY 11971-0728 December 26, 2002 via Return Receipt Mail Town of Southold Board of Town Trustees Town Hall 53095 Route 25 Southold, NY 11971-0959 Attention: Albert J. Krupski,. President Re: Public Notice #2002-00347-L2 Dear Mr. Krupski: The impact of a new dock next to our property is as follows: · Navigational · Welfare of the people · Property values · Environmental concerns · Usage of beach and scenery thereof · Public trust Navigational & Welfare of the People Sailboats, swimmers, wind surfers, and small motorboats for water skiers will be impacted with a 150' dock. There will be potential hazards for our family and others that use and are entitled to the waterways, as well as anyone else. The safety concerns and usage of our entitlements will be drastically impacted in a negative and impractical way. The sight way for the beach area will be drastically reduced as well. 'Dfis is not a commercial area, but a residential beach protected from such unnecessary structures. My objection to a 150' dock is as follows: Our beachfront is used for swimming and sailing. My wife and I have six children with 23 grandchildren. The concern that we have is navigational problems. The children sail and swim all spring, summer, and fall. The 150' dock will hinder sailing and create a hazard to the children. Other concerns are general environmental problem such as: 1. Recreational plus the welfare of my family 2. Property value 3. Environmental concerns 4. Erosion problem 5. The tranquility of the beach for swimming Property Values Property values are enhanced by the natural beauty of the beach and genuine characteristics of the waterways. Such large docks are appurtenances that simply provide convenience and enjoyment for one minor group; namely, the owner of the dock. Values of properties are to be kept at a premium through the proper restriction and surveillance of unnecessary structures. Environmental Concerns & Usage of Beach The amount of jetting and installation of this dock will have a negative effect on the marine life and the natural erosion of the beaches. Our concern for protection of the beaches and marine life is paramount in the future preservation of the pristine scenery of the Peconic Bay (Shelter Island Sound) water edge. Public Trust The right of every person to enjoy the Peconic sand beaches from the shore will be compromised. A large dock will deter any public enjoyment by eliminating walking along this area of the proposed dock. It is no one's right to remove the freedom of enjoyment of water and beaches that are owned by the public. Freedom to walk along the beaches is a God-given right to all. The Petrocelli family strongly opposes such a structure due to the potential safety and negative environmental impacts associated with this installation. Very truly yours, John M. Petrocelli, Sr. President JMP/ss Enclosure US Army Corps of Engineers New York District Jacob K JawI$ Federal Building New York. N Y 10278-0090 A~-N. Regulatory Branch PUBLIC NOTICE In replying refer to: Public Notice Number: Issue Date: Expiration Dane: 2002-00347-L2 December 10, 2002 January 9, 2003 To Whom It May Concern: The New York District, Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 403). APPLICANT: James Miller 538 Edwards Avenue Calverton, NY 11933 ACTIVITY: Construct a Pier Assembly, Wavebreak Curtain, and Dolphins WATERWAY: Shelter Island Sound LOCATION: Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. A detailed description anc~ plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. Thc decision whether io issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics. aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and,in general 'the needs and welfare of the people. The Corp. s of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public: Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes: and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WPdTING AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise, it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. An}, person may request, in writing, before this public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect mformanon necessary to consider this apphcation. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons wh? a public hearing should be held It should be noted that informanon submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the pemnt decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 2002-00347-L2 Our prclimmary determ, nation is that the activity for which authorization is sought herein is not likely to affect an_,,' Federally endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat. However. pursuant to Section 7 or the Endangered Species .Act ~16 U.5 .C. 1531), the District Engineer is consulting with the appropriate Federal agency to determine the presence or' and potential impacts to listed species in the project area or their critical habitat. The Magnuson-Stew:m. Fishery Conservation and Management Act, as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 {Public Law 104-2673, requires all federal agencies to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on all actiors, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency, that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitzt IEFH). A complete description of the project is given in the attached Work Description. The District Engineer has made the prelimipary determination that the site-specific adverse effects are not likely to not be substantial Further consultation with NMFS regarding EFH impacts and conservation recommendations is being conducted and will h,.~ concluded prior to the final decision. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for. or ~ncluded in. the Register within the permit area. Presently unknown archeological, scientific. prehistorical, or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)]. for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone ora state which has a federally approved coastal zone management program, the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with. and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with. the approved state coastal zone management program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actions occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone Management Program, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone (518) 474-6000. Corm'nents regarding the applicant's certification, and copies of any letters to this office commenting upon this proposal,'should be so addressed. In addition to any required water quality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant bas obtained or requested the following governmental authorization for the activity under consideration: · New York State Department of Environmental Consern'ation Permit · Town of Southold It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy ofihis notice. If you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at (212) 264-6730 and ask for Mary Ann Miller. For more information on New York District Corps of Engineers programs, visit our website at http://www.nan.usace.army.mil FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: Enclosures i~.Richard L Tomer Chief, Regu atory Branch CENAN-OP-RE PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 2002-00347-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, James Miller, has requested Department of the Army authorization to construct a pier assembly and a wave break and to install dolphins. The site is in Shelter Island Sound at the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The work would involve construction of a 4' by 40' ramp, a 4' by 40' fixed timber pier, a 6' by 70' fixed timber pier, and a 6' by 24' pier, in an "L" configuration, with a 30' long wavebreak curtain elevated a minimum of 2 feet above the bottom. Within the "L", a 2.8' by 12' seasonal ramp and a 6' by 20' seasonal float would be installed. The work would also involve installation of two (2) three-pile dolphins spaced 40' apart and located 25' from the 70' by 6' proposed pier on its south side. The stated purpose of this project is to provide mooring for applicant's vessel(s). The project would impact approximately 0.02 acres of Essemial Fish Habitat (EFH) for all life stages of Winter Flounder (Pleuronectes americanus), Windowpane Flounder (Scopthalmus aquosus), and Red Hake (Urophycis chuss), as well as juvenile and adult stages of Summer Flounder (Paralicthys dentams). Habitat at the sae may be described as sandy-bottom substrate. The species listed prey upon small benthic invertebrates, such as crustaceans, polychaetes, shrimp, and mollusks, in addition to other suspended microscopic invertebrates. Pile driving for the piers may affect reproduction and feeding success, but this would be temporm'y and limited to the immediate area. Installation of the wavebreak would not have an affect on the substrate as the bottom of the wavebreak will be approximately two feet above the sea floor. Turbidity and mechanical structures associated with construction may impact feeding of juveniles and adults, but populations present at the time of construction will likely flee to waters where disturbances are fewer. This project should minimally impact reproductive and feeding success of the aforementioned species. Furthermore, the proposed structures may act as attachment surfaces for encrusting organisms, which could increase the forage base at the site and provide additional ecological functions. 72~ 2? 0"W ,j~.' 2~ ... '"'~ ' ' ~'~U I ~ " '~ .... .:...-_¢.~:~..~,~_..~..¢~ .. .............~ ~ ~ ~ ,.' ~ ~2¢~;t'.~ -~ ~'"';'~(~""',-~--" . ..... ~,.. ,: ,, ,,. ,~- ..- ~ -. ~ ', i~: ~ '...-'~ ~ ~'~ ,., ...~ ~ . ~.:',~ ~ =' ~ ~' ... ~ .~ ', ..... ~ .... ~,.: ~j:,. ...... ~a : / ') . ~... ........ ......· . ~[ ~: i~ ' · " 2~ 22 ~',. 'kll ~ '."/ ¢ ((~....-'--.~L --' ¢ ' /' r ....... :.t ~s ,~ .' .~ "~t~ ¢~ ~ ' ' "'" ' s~ ~ ~, ~,.-.~ 2~ · ' .............. ' ........' ~ '" t ~ "¢~'v. . ~'~'.. " ~ ~o ~o ......... -'" , ~ t'....:.' Cha~ Name NY LI SHELTER IS~ND SOUND AND PECONIC BAYS Cha~ ID' 12358 1 Top Left 41~ 5. ~8., N 72, 27.6.. W ~ ~c~om RBqnt: 40~ 59. 57,, N 72~ 21. 19,,W ,D MAPTECH INC C.O~.~T~LLO IV~AI~i N F_ COHTI~ACTIN~' I~O. ~OX ~IE~4- ~EE~'NPO~N~ ~"( 5ITC- ~ 'iL" ~OC~ APPLICANT: dAME6 MILLER 5~ E~A~D~ AVE. SHEET 2 OF (~, ¢R0.5,~ .SECTION A-A ¢OSTELLO MAP-II'dE (:;Oki'TR..ACTING COI~.I~ E'O. ISOX ~t~.4- ,~I~EENPOR. T, NY II~'~,, APP/I C:,,~NT i · JAME,~ MIL/EP- CALVER.TON., NY I 1955 Ivt~ P.,. ~ MA2. ,..~? ~ SHEET '~ OF {~ FLOAT +9.5-- C IRO,~,.,~ ~ECTI ONl~a I~ ~ ~101 I~OTTOM ITOCK DETAIL' 0 ~-' J 5HEFT 4 OF ~ F__L. +~.0 :; PEEPAR. ED ¢~OTgLLO MARIN~ ~.<)ld'rl~TIl~ APPLICANT' ,J AM[5 MILLER. 5~,~ ~..l~V',/Ag.l~.~ ,aVE. CAL.V,~..~.'TON¢ t,,J"( I~,~ (1(.~10 J~AgAJ~'I.~E PT. ~,U~. 5, ~.o0~_ I~O~K O.ETAIL I ~R O,J I= C.,'T LOCATI 014 (D LocATION M^I° VICINITY MAP ~ 0 I ~. ~ 4-000' Ag,JAGENT PROPERTY OWNER. S: I~O I~E P.T Gl LIDISRT 1,4.~O PAI~ADISE PT, RD. PROPOSEO: CON..%TI[UCTIN~ A 4~x40~ J~AM~ ¢OMTII4UIN~ WITH A LEVEL 4Jx '~,0' OOC~.,~ THEN A ~X10' DoGK AHD ENDING WITH A ~ ~ ~ ~ hu ~OCK POIMTIN~ ~ETHE~T. ON ~E NORTH- WI~H A ~x I0~ LAMP LEA~ING TOA &.5~x ~O LOW~ PLAT~RM. AP~ITIONALLY~ INSTALLI~ TWO ~-PILE DOLPHINS AND ONE ~IN~LE PILE. PREPAREI~ J~,Y: ¢O~TELLO MARINE C, ONTRACTINC~ CORE J~-O. ~X~X 21534- ~REENPOE"r~ NY ~,'~ I - .4--/"7- I1~'~ APPLICANT: ,JAM E,~ MILLEE. ~'~ EOWAEU.~ AVE. C. ALVERTON~ NY ('1~,10 PARADISE POINT dAN. IG, ~00~ NOV. 17/ ~00~ ~HEET I OF 5 d ETI'Y APPLICANT: COSTELLO ~ARINE CONTRACTING COEF. JAN. le, ~o. ~OX ~1~ GRE~NPOIN~ NY II~&4 MAR. ~, ~oo~ · %1 -477- I1~NO~ 17,~ AU~. 5~ ~00~ 5HF_-.ET 2 OF 5 5HP-ET $ OF 5 14-x& ~TR. INC~E~I~- -- A IVl H W -- AI~LW I~OTTO M DOCK ~ LOWER PLATFORM DETAIL 0 ~ . 4-j APPLI CAKIT: dAME~ MILLER. ~8 F--DWARg$ AVE. CALVE~TON~ NY IlO~ AU~. ~ ~OO2 NOV. I~ ~00~ SHEET ~ OF 15OTTO M J MIN. IMSHOF-E POC~ DETAIL. 0 P_' 4-' JAMF_..5 MILI~ C. ALV,~I~.TOF,I/ N"i/ I1~ AU~. ~, ~00~ NOV. 17, ~H~ET 5 OF 5 11: 44 63i~6~495~ · 4770c~05 HO, :.3Z ;Z2 COpy COSTELLO MARINE ..cONTRACTiNG. CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING * j~, I I IE~ * BUI. KHEADIN{] · ~EE~ & ~ PIUN~. FLOATS N~m~r ~2, 2002 Mr. ~mes Miller 538 Edwards Avenue Calverton, NY 11933 Modifications for Propcr~ Dock Project 1610 Paracllse Point Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. NIIler, in regards to our recent conversations it is my understanding that you are willing to reduce the soope of your Sotaholcl Town ap~icafion in order to lessen the envimnmentel impacts and remain censistent with the New York Stat~ Department of Envimnmentel Conservation (NYSDEC) approval as per permit #14738-0166[/00003. Ny understanding Is that you are willing to make the following modifications: · Rmluee the proposed 6~ 40' Inshore ramp to a 4' wiclth. · After the ramp area, reduc~a the next 40' Inshore end from a 6' width to a 4' wicrd% · ~ at this time (may reapply at a later date If necassae/)i'the 15,000 lb. boatllft from the offshore south sl~ as per the recommendation of Chris Arfsten of the NYSDEC end his concern that the IIRIng beams may hit bottom and disturb the benthic community. Instead of the I:)oatlift and our concerns of rough weather damaging your boat the NYSDEC has allowed for ~e construction of a 30' splashboard beneath the offshore secUon, it is my unde~tandlng that your are also willing to ~lmlaate this portion of the proje . As allowed by the NYSDEC, Increasing the number of mooring pilings to two groups of three in order to reduce Ice flows from damaging the narrower, weaker inshore 80' section of ramp/dock. · Zn order m minimize .l#ldln(] beneath file 6' x 20' float you aaree ~gJJJ~1~J~ll[~ and ~nstru~ a fixed 4' x 7.0' lower platform (decked to 4.5') providing it Is moved offshore toward the comer of the '%# with a platform and ramp placed on the Inshore side. I personal¥ recommend installing a single inshore piling to secure the boat off the rower platform, if the lower platform is allowed by the Soul,old Town Trustees. I am attempting to contact either Chris Affsten or Charles Hamilton of the NYSDEC in order to ascertain whether they will allow an amendment /modification eliminating the splashboard and changing the float to a smaller fixed lower I~latform with a single mooring piling. As you are aware, by agreeing to reduce the project for the Southold Town Trustees, you are eliminating the possibility of having the structure wldenecl to 6' by the NYSDEC tflrougb either an amendment to an existing permit or bhrough a n~v aopllcat~on. Iio President lAC:lot 150~ 0 - 5~ EOWAR~5 AVE. LOCATI O1',,I MAI= ^D,JAC.,ENT ?R.©PERTY Owt4El~ 0 ,.}OHI,,J 1~ UOA.'-~ PETROC. ELLI (~) 4.OO I~Oblf. RT ~1 LbERT -~ -,~0 ~OC~ THEN A O(XTO' ~OCK A~O ~ '30' LOt4~ '~AV~CM~AI~ M~E~N~A~H. FROM A DITJONA~i IN~TAbCIN~ TWO ~-PlbE DObRHIN~. PREPARED ~,': : P.O. ~:)OX $~1-477- dAM E,~ MILLER. 5'&~ P_.I~WARIR~ AVE[. Cl(~lO PARAOI6E POIMT ,JAN. I~, £00[ MAR. E~O~ ~C~3E. ~HEET I O~'G COST~LLO MARINE. CONTRACTING ~.0. ~0× al~ ~Fa~ENPOIN~ Nhr %~.Y.I ~TI Ne Tgl~" TII~I~E~. ~ P L_A kl VIEW < I 0 30' PR.OPO~EO Co.STE LLO MAI~--I NE CONTR. AC;TI I~IG APPLICANT: .JAM E,O MILLER. 5'56 EOWAF,.D,.5 AVE. CALVER.TO 1,1, kl¥ ,-JAN. I°~, .~00~ AU~. ~,, ~00~_. k,4.~l~..~.01 ~00~' F gOAT -- AM H W iM61PE PILE~ 4: E~OTT OM I I .I I I' I 0~ II~, OFP _.SPLASH:DOAED PEEPAJ~E P ~y: C'E055 ~ E CT I O1',,I AI=II~L i CA NT, CALVe_ ~TO I'q~ t. Jy I I ~5~ (:1~,10 I=AI~AD, 15E I=.T. ED.') ~',U~. ~, ~.OO~ '- ,~NEET 5 Of= G ~.'~ J~ ~" I0I- '+2,5 ~' ,~hW ' VAglE~ ~ I~~ ~1~. PENBT~ATI ON 00¢t~ OETAI L SHEET 5 OF ~, Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fmx(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application .,.,"Wetland Permit Application ~" Major Waiver/AtnendmentI(~hanges ,,,'Received Applic a.,ti..o_n':,~_~O ~}-) ~R. eceived Fee:$ ~ .,L~mpleted Application~ Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted ~'CAC Referral Sent: LDate of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination:__ Technical Review: ~"'Public Hearing Held:~ Resolution: Minor Name of Applicant Address ~ ~ Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - Property Location: I [0 l~) To~vtldS~. '"'?~t~A~ '~C~d (provide LILCO Pole ~, dist~ce to c~oss streets, and logation) AGENT: O~llG (a ar.h a Oorp. (If applicable~ - ' ~ Address: Phone: ( {a~l ~ 43'-1' I lC~q Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet): ~.:~AO, ~ ~/f~ Area Zoning: /'~e~deVl.~Ll~L W~Y~rL~ Previous use of prope.y: ~%~.~ ~a~ Intended use of property: ~H ~ Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date 2( No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? .x No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary):. I Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: -T~ Area of wetlands on lot: 0 square feet Percent coverage of lot: /~ °A Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: {') feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? ,2< No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? cubic yards How much material will be filled? tq] ~, cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: t~IA Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: tn/A Mannbr in which material will be removed or deposited: t-~1A feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations. (use attachments if app. ropriate): v itl be- ef-,ccr_ b Albert J. Krupstd, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OFSOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application of COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, j~.~ C0~ {!0 .~_~_9, , residing at ~ _~.e¥~{~ ~'i ~,D~. ~ being duly swor~, depose' and say: That on the t% ~ ~ day pf. , ~0~, ~personall~pos~ed,th9 property known as ~ ~%~e ~o%~ ~~. ~ ~q by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where l~ c~n easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of ~ke public h~aring. Date of hearing noted thereon to be held ~~~ Dated: Sworn to before me this % ~ day of~_~-~ 200~- Notary Public REBECCA A. VILAROI NOTARY PU~,LIC, STATE OF NEW YORK QUALiFiED tN SUFFOLK COUNTY NO: 01W060,39106 COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 27, .~__.u ,., Board of Trustees Application County of Suffolk State of New York DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BEL1EF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE 1N THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS AILISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION 'WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. /'- S~'n~ture SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /~ DAYOF V-4~& Notary Publi~ ~ Rebecoa A. Wolfram Notary Public, State of New York No: 01W06039106 Qualified in Suffolk County .,~ Commission Expirg. s March COSTELLO MARINE CONTRACTING CORPORATION DOCK BUILDING ° JETTIES · BULKHEADING ° STEEL & WOOD PILING ° FLOATS 423 FIFTH STREET · P.O. BOX 2124 · GREENPORT, NEW YORK 11944 · (631) 477-1199 / 477-1393 / 477-0682 ° FAX (631) 477-0005 AUTliORIZATION FORM referenced property. ~t¢ ~ I, owner of l~tedat /~/° V ~~~ /~ , do hereby ~ve Costello Mmne Con~c~g Co~. ~e au~ofiW to act ~ agent in my behalf in applying for all of the ne~ss~ ~i~ for work to be comple~d at my above Si~e NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: J&~% ~W SCTM#~000- SI-~-R.~ YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: Co~h~tc.~ ~ ~'~4o' r~.p, ~o~(~I ~h ~ ~cv~l ~'~ Ilo' ~c" u" 8oc~, ~Ntllc% A ~-"~lZ' rn~ l~v~t ~ ~- ~'~ZO' 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review.~is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: MAIL'ING ADDRESS: PHONE #: Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. 14-16-4 (12/97}-..<1 SEQR IPROJECTID NUMBER I ~17.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAl. OUAUTY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART ~PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 4. RRECISE LOCATION: (Sitar IddreJi ind road mterllct]on$, prominent lanclmarkt, etc., or provide map) l~tO -~M~'~-~"~az~ S.C.IT. H. ~o -e~ -~- iq.d, 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New PROJECT BRIEFLY: 8. WIL~ PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Ag,cu~r. 10. DOES ACT1ON INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELy FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal, S~ate or Loca;}? If the action Is In the Coastal Area, end you are a state agency, ' J complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceJdlng with this assessment I OVER FOR PERMIT United States Army Corps of Engineers 1. Check permits applied for: 2. Name of Applicant (Use full name) ~/~lephona Number (oaytlme) NYSDept, of EnvlronmentalConservation , MdleF.. r Mailing Add re~"' ~] S[ream D,sturbance (Bed and Banks) 538 FdWa [] Nay,gable Waters (Excavation and F~II) [] (~'°n°c~sS~ruMct°~r~npgl~Sc~r)Plad°rrns P°s~-~f~'/~-V"~V') ~'~ [] Dams and Im~undment S~ctures 3. Tax.yet ID (If appli~nt is not an mdwidual) ~ Freshwater Wetlands ¢~llca~t is ~an: (ch¢ as many as apply) -~Owne, ~ Operator ~ Lessee ~ Mumclpall~, Govem~n~l Agency ~ Coas[al Erosion Conlrol ~ Long island Wells ~O' ~X 0 ~ ~4 ~ FISh Control , 'i~C~n~: ~ ~ Tow~C~iliage~ T~ Map S~o~ Bilk /Lot Numar: NY~ Office of General Se~lces ~ Lease, L~nse. Ea~ment or Loca~on (including S~eet or Road) I Telephone Number (da~bme) other Real Prope~ Interest d Ubh~Easement(p,~lmes.~ndui., lbl0 I ~?d J'*~{ T. Nam. o, 8.amor Wa.rbod. ,on or near proj Adirondack Pa~ Agency ~ Freshwater Wetlands Permit N~-E N~-N 4 repla~ment; Type of Structure or Activi~ e.g. bulkhead, dr~gmg, filling, dam, d~k, taking of waler; Ty~ of Matenals and QuanBties; St~cture and Work Area Dimens~ons, Ne~ or Purpose Se~ed) ~ Na~onwlde Pe~it DEC APPLICATION NUMBER ...... explana.ono, why work was s[a.ed wghoutpermitJ .es''No 16. Wgl ~,s Project Req.lr. Addl.o.al ~ ~ flY.s. . Date ~ ~ ~ Signature of Appli~nt . Title PART II--ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR PART 617,47 E. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR PART 617.67 C7. Other ~mpacts (including changes in ute of either quanfit,/or type of iftergy)? r~n briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CEA? [] Yes [:] NO E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? n Yii r-1 No If yes, explain briefly PART II--DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (TO be completed by Agency) ssseesed ~n connection w~th ~ (a) tettlng (i.e., u~oln or ~rll); (b) ptopabllity of occumng; (c) duration: (d) irrevers~bility; (e) geograp.h~c scope. [] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large and significant adverse impacts which may ~ccur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. [] Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: S~gnalure ol Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If ;tilterent from responsible ofl,cer)