Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKokkinos & Tsokanos 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance SEOR Project Number coz-pet.-290 Date November 15, 1988 Tills notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Board , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on thc environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change of Zone for George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos SEQR Status: Type I ,~ Unlisted 1~ Description of Action: TO change the zoning on applicant's premises from its present (A) Residential to B-1 General Business District. Location. (Inciu~e street address and th[ nam£ o' the mun;cipahty',~oumN. scale ~s also, recommendeo.) Located at Main Road, Peconic, Town of Southold, County ef Suffolk. See also attached map. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: See EAF Part II and III attached A change of zone for this parcel alone would result in a significant imapct on the environment. As the Part III statement reveals, the Town would put itself in a position of Vulnerability with respect to other pre-existing non-conforming properties throughout the Town. This proposal would also be in contradiction with the adopted Master Plan and constitute spot zoning. If the Town wishes to further consider this zoning change it should cause a generic EIS addressing the above situations to be prepared by the applicant. For Further Information: Ccntact Person: AOdress: Telephone Number: A Cop,.' of this Notice Sent to' Comm.ssioner. Department of Environmental Consen, ation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany. New York 12233-903'~ Aepropriate Re.oionalOfhceofthe Depar~mentof Environmental Conservation-Stony Brook, N.Y. Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdiwsion in which the action will be principalt.~ Appi,cant (if any) Otaer involved agencies (if any) 5outhold Town Board Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Board of Appeals Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services Town Clerk's Bulletin Board KEY MAP SCALE I": 600' · , ' Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS A~D THEIR MAGNITUDE ~ Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: 'Have my responses and determinations-been reasonable~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also nec~ssarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at fur:her. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most s~tuations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore. the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive hst of impacts and thresholds to answer each question · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to ind,cate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example pro',, ded. check column 2. If impact wdl occur but threshold is tower~than example. 'check column 'I. ' ' ' d. If reviewer has doubt about s~ze of the impact then consider the m~pact as potentiali'v large and proceed to PART 3 e. If a potentiall;' large ~mp.~ct checked in column 2 can be m~t~gated by chan~e(s) m the project to a smail to moderate impact, also check the Yes box m column 3. A No response me.cares that such a reduction ~s not pos~ bk. Th~s must be expla,ned ~n RaH 3 IMPACT ON LAND \VdI the propo,~.d achon rt.~ult m a physical chanL~e to the pro~ect sde~ [~ampies that ~ould apply to column 2 Any construcuon on slopes et 15% or greater, (15 foot r~se per 100 (eot of length;. (:rv. hore the ~eneral slope~ in the prolc, c: area exceed 10% 3 fe(,t 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3. Potential Can Imp.-:st Be Large Mdigate~: E,,. Impact Project Change Z×o ~'~o ~Yes ~','e~ 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) r~NO FqYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utihty distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts' 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ~NO f~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 30% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts' 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quahty o~ quantity? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Actio. will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (prolect) acbon · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per mmute pumping capacity · Construction or operahon causing any contamlrJation of a water supply system. · Proposed ~ction will adverse'~ affect ground~ater · Lmquld effluent wdl be convev,.d off the site to facihties v,h~ch presenth,. do not ex,st or have madequate capacity 'e Proposed Act[gq ~outd use water in excess of 20,00r) ga)ions per [~. mples tnat wouhJ app~'v to column 2 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Se Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] l-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] -' []Yes E~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [:]Yes ["INo [] [] DYes F1mo - D El-- I]¥es D~o [] [] []Yes []~o [] [] ~Yes r'l~o [] [] [3Yes [-]No · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway· · Other impacts; ........ IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~No I-tYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given · hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Wile Proposed ACt,on affect any threatened or endangered species~ I~NO r-iY[S E,amples that would apply to column 2 · Reducbon of one ot more species listed on the New York or Federal hst, using the site. over or near site or found on the site. · Removz.' of any portion of a critical or significant ~ild]ife habitat. · Apphcation of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than /or ~gncultural purposes · 'Other impacts' non-endangered sp,'c.~~ ~.'NO [xamples that v, ouJd ap;,l~ to Column 2 IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Idnd [m(lude, (roi.land ha~fJeld~ pasture. ~mc~rd. o~chard. I 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] L--lYes []No F-I [] r]Yes ONo [] [] DYes DNo [] [] DYes •No [] [] DYes ['-lNg [] [] DYes []NO [] [] []Yes •No [] [] _ .DYes •No [] [] P'lYes •No [] [] []Yes •No [] [] DYes I-IN• [] [] []Yes i-IN• [] [] []Yes •No [] [] DYes []No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricuhural land or. if located in an Agricultutal D~strict. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land, ...... ~. The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural la~'d management systems {e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping), or create a need for such measures (e.g cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? I'~NO DYES Visual EAF (1~ n?~:essa~¥, u_~e~t_he_~_' Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B ) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether r~ n-made or natural · Proposed land uses, or proiect components visible to users of a,.,thehc resources which wilt ehminate or significantly reduce their e' B'ment of the aesthetic qualmes of that resource · P:.'ject components that will result ~n the ehmination or significant screening of scenic v,e~s known to be important to the area · O:her ~mpacts I&*PACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 V,'iH Proposed Act.on impact any si:e or structure of h~stor[c, pre- h,~tor.c or paleontoloF,ca] ~mportance~ [~'~NO '' E%empJes thal ~,ould ap[,]~ to column 2 IMPAC'I ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION [~ampl(.s thai ~'.ou!d apph Io ':olumn 2 L~NO ~Y[S · O',her [mpact~ 1 Small to Moderate Impact 2 3 Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitigated By Impact Project Change [] []Yes []No [] []Yes []No [] - C}Ves -q:3No [] I--IVes •No [] [] [] [-~Yes []No []'res EgNo ~yes ~',es EgNo L~, Yes uJ~' Nc, lm~es []~'o ~Yes E]No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems7 ~NO ~YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods, · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems · Other impacts ~z~ increase in traffic qenerated by this site would occur. IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed achon affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ~NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of enersy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy :transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 simzle or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or ,vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? [i~'NO fi]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive fac,hty · Odors will occur routmeb,, Imore than one hour per day) · Proposed Action v, ill produce operatmi; no,se exceedml~ the local ambient no~se levels for no,se outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH Proposed Act,on affect pubhc heahk ant: safet'~~ 10 I 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] DYes []No [] [] DYes I'-~ No [] ~ ~lyes I'-] No ~ [] E~Yes []No I-I [] DYes []No [] [] [DYes E]No [] [] D'res [] Eg E]Ye~ E]No [] [] EgYes r~No [] [] I~l't'es IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18 Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community~' E3NO []YES E,amples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment · Other impacts: I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [~ l--lYes [~No [] [] []Yes ["~ No [] [] []Yes [-]No [] [] J--]Yes []No [] ~ []Yes I~No [] ~ ~Yes ~No 19 Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impactsf f~NO ~Y£S AS of 10/17/88 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) ma~ bc m[6gated. Instructions D~scu~ the ioJ[ow~nE for each ~mpact ,denhf,(,d ,n CoJumn 2 Of Part ? 2 Ot-scr~beOiapphcable)hov, thc-~mpactcouldbr mm~atedorreddcedtc, a sm~lttomooerate~mpartbvprolectchar, 8c., (Continue on aHachment~) 11 PART III George Kokkinos and Steven Change of Zone Tskoanos Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: The proposed action will conflict with the officially adopted Master Plan and the proposed zoning for the Town. It will also cause a change in the possible density of land uses as well as the permitted allowable uses. An important precedent will be set for future change of zone requests similar nature where pre-existing non-conforming buildings exist on site*. It would lead to pressure from other landowners to request the same type of spot zoning change. Clearly this is not the intent of the existing or proposed zoning or of the Master Plan. * This type of precendent would require a generic environmental impact statement. Impact on Transportation A change in zone would permit a number of new uses to be proposed that could be significantly more intense than the existing uses and that could generate significantly more traffic. .JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTItOLD March 20, 1990 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 FAX (516) 765-1823 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. 828 Front Street P. O. Box 803 Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Kevin: More than a year has passed since the enclosed letter was sent to you concerning the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone. In fact, it precedes the enactment of the new amendments to the Zoning Code and Zoning Map. If I do not have a response by April 20, 1990 I shall consider this change of zone petition to have been abandoned by the applicant. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, $outhold Town Clerk Enclosure cc: Town Board Town Attorneys JUDITH T, TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS .,/~: ~ .' ..~_.~" ',~' OF~CE OF THE TOWN C~ TOWN OF SO'HOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 November 16, 1988 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. 828 Front Street P. O. Box 803 Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Kevin: Transmitted herewith is a Positive Declaration of the Southold Town Board with respect to the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone, as well as a certified copy of the Board's decision which includes the determination that $2,000.00 deposit shall be paid prior to the scoping session to defray the cost of reviewing the Generic Environ- menal Impact Statement. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures (2) JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLO TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 15, 1988: WHEREAS, George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos has heretofore applied to the Southolct Town Board for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-l" General Business District on certain property located on the north side of Route 25, east of Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law; Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is unlisted and is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos, of this determination, and further request said applicant to prepare aGeneric Environmental Impact Statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. 4. In accordance with Chapter 44, Section 20 and Part 617 NYCRR, the applicant is required to defray the cost of reviewing lheGeneric Environmental Impact Statement, which includes a scoping session, therefore, the Town Board determines that a deposit of $2,000.00 shall be paid to the Town Clerk prior to the date of the scoping session. Judith T. T~ Southold Town Clerk November 16, 1988 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 15, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-l" General Business District on certain property located on the north side of Route 25, east of Peconic Lane, Peconic, New York. ~ Judith T. Terry (f Southold Town Clerk November 16, 1988 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE November 1, 1988 $outhold Town Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Change of zone petition of Kokkinos and Tsokanos SCTM 91000-75-1-16 Dear Supervisor Murphy, In response to Kevin McLaughlin's letter of October 18, 1988 regarding the above named application, the Planning Board wishes to note for the record that it adopted the Master Plan document on December 2, 1985. Therefore, its comments to the Town Board regarding the inconsistancy of this proposed rezoning to the Master Plan are not considered inappropriate. Very truly yours, BENNE~ ORLOWSKI, JR. .~'~ CHAI~ ~" VS/jt ¥141988 COUNTY OF SUFFOLK PATRICK G. HALPIN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Ms. Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Town of Southold 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Dear Ms. Terry: LEE ~. KOPPELMAN November 3, 1988 Application of "George Kokkinos and Steve Tsokanos" (#290) for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural & Residential to "B-i" General Business, Town of Southold (SD-88-33). Pursuant to the requirements of Sections A14-14 to 23 of the Suffolk County Administrative Code, the Suffolk County Planning Commission on November 2, 1988, reviewed the above captioned application and after due study and deliberation Resolved to disapprove it because of the following reasons: It is inconsistent with the pattern of zoning in the surrounding area and therefore must be considered as "spot zoning"; It constitutes the unwarranted further perpetuation of strip business zoning along Main Road (N.Y.S. Rte. 25); It would tend to establish a precedent for further such downzonings in the locale along Rte. 25; 4J It would tend to establish a precedent for the continuance of such a practice for other nonconforming uses throughout the Town of Southold; It contravenes policy objectives setforth in the recent Town of Southold Master Plan update which calls for the discontinuance of strip business zoning outside hamlet centers along the Towns major corridors; and, It is inconsistent with the recent Town Master Plan update which designates this area for agricultural/residence purposes. Very truly yours, Lee E. Koppelman Director of Planning Chief Planner GGN:mb SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS .e ll November 7, 1988 Mrs. Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town of Southold 53~95 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 NOV 1 0 Re: Change of Zone, George Kokkinos & Steve Tsokanos Dear Mrs. Terry: Enclosed is the completed LEAF, mentioned subdivision, as well declaration. If you have any questions, Parts II and III for the above as, the recommended SEQRA please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ~-.S~ ~ita, AICP Principal Planner DJSE:mt Enclosure 23 Narragansett Ave. lamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance SEQR Project Number Date %., This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conserv'ation Law. The $outhold To~:t Board , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change of Zone for George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos SEQR Status: Type I [] Unlisted [] Description of Action: To change the zoning on applicant's premises from its present (A) Residential to B-1 General Business District. Location. dr, clu~e street address arid th6 nam£ o' the munic]pah:y COdm',. A location map of apprcDr~_=t£ scale is aisc, recommended.) Located at Main Road, Peconic, Town of Southold, County Qf Suffolk. See also attached map. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: See EAF Part II and III attached _ A change of zone for this parcel alone would result in a significant imapct on the environment. As the Part III statement reveals, the Town would put itself in a position of Vulnerability with ~pect't~th~ ~e-existing non-conforming properties throughout the Town. This proposal would also be in contradiction with the adopted Master Plan and constitute spot zoning. If the Town wishes to further consider this zoning change it should cause a generic EIS addressing the above situations to be prepared'by the applicant. For Further Information: Contact Person: Address: Telephone Number: A Cctv of this Notice Sent to: Corem ssioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wo!f Roadl Albany, New York 12_233-3~J; Appropriate Regional Ofhce of th6 Department of Environmental Conservation Offme of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdiwsion in which the action will be principali,~ Appi,cant (H any) Other involved agencies (if any) KEY MAP SCALE I": 600' ,/ /, ? Part JI~PROJECT IMPACTS A~D THEI~VIAGNITUDE Responsibilily of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer shouid be guided by the question:'Have my responses and determinations-been reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also ne(~ssarily significanL Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact Jn column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further.. The l:xamples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But. for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. TEe'imp'act~ pi ~e,~ch P'roie~:t, On ~,~:~ site~ in 'each Iocalitv,-wili ~a;'¥. Tl~refore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive hst of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider IoDg term, short term and cumlative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. '" c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example p.r. ov~ded, check_co)t~mn 2. If impac! will occur but.threshold - is tower~'han example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the re;pact as potentJall,.' large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large ~mpact checked in column 2 can be m~bgated by chan~e(s) in the prolect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box m column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible Th~s must be expiamed in Pa~t 3. IMPACT ON LAND %'dj the proposed action r*?~olt m a physical chanqe to the project s,tc [~amples that ~,ou~d ~p[Ay to column 2 Any /onstruchon on slopes of 15% or greater. [15 foot r~e per foot o~ lengthL or ~here [he general slopes in the prolect area exceed 10% Con~truchon on land where the depth to the water tablP ~ le5~ th2n 1 Small to MoOerate Impact Potential Can Impact Be Large Mitig;teo Impact Project Change ,re. Yes ~xo r-; ~'~'e. ~- ' Z -- ~',es ~ye~ -~o 6 IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channeJ of a protected stream· · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetlan~ · Other impacts' 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? .~NO f-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impac~: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quahty or quantity? :~NO CIYES [xamples that would apply to cotumn 2 · Proposed Actio, will require a discharge permit· · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (proiect} acbon · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity · Construction or operation causm[ any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed ~.cbon will adver~e'~ affect ground~ater · L~quid effluent w~il be conve\.,-d off the site to faohties which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity 'e Proposed ^ct~oq ~ould use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per da'~ p,oducts g,eater than ~ 1Od gallons sYal-r runoffl :~NO '-Y[$ [x~ ~ples that woulCJ app'.,,' to column 2 7 I 2 3 Small to Potential , Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impac[ Impact Project Change [] [] I--lYes [~NO D [] i-lYes [~No [] [] F"]Yes r']No - [] ' []-- r-iYes [~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-INo [] [] []Yes [-iNo [] [] I-lYes [--iNo [] [] I--lyes []No [] [] [~Yes ~-~ N o L_ Ye_~ · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: ......... IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? [~',WO r"'IyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million B3'U's per hour. · Proposed action wilt allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8 Wdl Proposed ACtion affect any threatened or endangered species? ~]NO r"lyE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduct*on of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal hst, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Rernovz' of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. · Apphcation of pesticide or herb:cide more than twice a year, other than tor ~gr~cultural purposes · 'Other impacts' %%111 Proposed Action substantlal]~ ~f~ect non threatened or noq-endan,~ered sp<'c~es~ ~R-NO [~,arnples [ha~ ~ouid ap;~l~ to column 2 IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES land [~n(lud~.~ tr~pl,~nd h,~f~erd~ pasture. ~nc~ard. orchard, etc) I 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impac'~ Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] DYes []NO [] [] I-lYes •No [] [] DYes •No [] [] DYes [] [] []Yes L"-INo [] [] DYes •No r-I [] DYes r-iNo _["-I ~._ . [:::]Yes. .•No [] [] I~lYes I-'1 No [] [] []Yes [•No [] [] []yes D~o [] [] E-lyes F-]No [] [] []Yes E3~o [] [] Dyes · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land· · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10.acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricultural D~strict. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land· ....... ~ The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural lard management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, st,p cropping), or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? F~NO f-lYES (If necessary, use the._V_isual FAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B ) E,amples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or proiect components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether m-n-made or natural · Proposed land uses. or project components visible to users of a,.~thetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their e' ~;'ment of the aestheti,c quaJihes of that resource · P:' le£t components that will result m the ehmmation or signihcant screemng of scemc wews known to be important to the area. · O:her ~mpacts' Ih'PACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Acbon ~mpact any si:e or structure of historic, pre- h~tohc ot paleontological tmportance~ ~INO ~'TE5 " Examples that woul~ ~p~,]~ to column 2 IMPAC'[ ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION [*arnpJes thai v, ou]d appk to ':_olumn 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Mnderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] I--1 []Yes []No - [] [] --. OYes [3No r-I [] I--lyes []No [] [] []Yes •No I~ [] DYes · [] [] []Yes ~ [] ~es D~'o [] [] DYes [5 ~,'o IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14 Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems7 ~NO ~YES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts ~ increase in traffic qenerated by this site would occur. IMPACT ON ENERGY 15 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? R~NO T-lYE S Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy .transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16 Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or .vibration as a result of the Proposed Action,~ [[rNO r~YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive fatality,. · Odors wdl occur routmel,,, {more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating no~se exceeding the local ambient no~se levels for no~se outside of structures · Proposed Action will remove natural baruers that would act as a noise screen · Other ~mpacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 V,'iJJ Proposed Action affect pubJ,c health and safet~ 10 I 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] E-]Yes E]No [] [] DYes DNo [] I'~ [~]Yes •No ~ .[] DYes []No [] [] []Yes r-INo [] [] []Yes []No 'lq [] []','es ~o [] [] E3','es I-INo [] [] []Yes [],o [] [] []Yes E3~o [] [] []Yes []~o I [] [~ [--Wes ~No 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] ["]Yes I-~No [] [] [-]Yes []No [] *~3 l--lYes [~No [] [] [--]Yes r~]No D ~ ~Yes 'D~o D ~ ~Yes DNo D ~ ~Yes ~No D D DYes D~o D D ~Yes D~o IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? E]NO (~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating sera;ices will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~'INO DYES AS of 10/17/88 if Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude o! Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s} is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s} ma~ be mitigated. Instructions D~cu~s the tollm'..,ng for each impact ,denbfled m CoJumn 2 of Part 2 F,r~..{l~,. describe' thc- Impa~t 2 D,-scr~be (J apphcable) how the ~mpact could b( mm~_ated or reduced to a small to'moderate tmpact by prolect 3 Da,ed or', the mformatmn avadable, dec~de ~I .t ~ reasonable to conclude that th~ ~mpact ,s important. To ans~er the quest,on of importance, cons~dc.r (Conbnue on attachment~) PART III George Kokkinos Change of Zone Steven Tskoanos Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood: The proposed action will conflict with the officially adopted Master Plan and the proposed zoning for the Town. It will also cause a change in the possible density of land uses as well as the permitted allowable uses. An important precedent will be set for future change of zone requests similar nature where pre-existing non-conforming buildings exist on site*. It would lead to pressure from other landowners to request the same type of spot zoning change. Clearly this is not the intent of the existing or proposed zoning or of the Master Plan. * This type of precendent would require a generic environmental impact statement. Impact on Transportation A change in zone would permit a number of new uses to be proposed that could be significantly more intense than the existing uses and that could generate significantly more traffic. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16) 765-1958 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD November 1 1988 Southold Town Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: ChanGe of zone petition of Kokkinos and Tsokanos SCTM ~1000-75-1-16 Dear Supervisor Murphy, In response to Kevin McLaughlin's letter of October 18, 1988 regarding the above named application, the Planning Board wishes to note for the record that it adopted the Master Plan document on December 2, 1985. Therefore, its comments to the Town Board regarding the inconsistancy of this proposed rezoning to the Master Plan are not considered inappropriate. Very truly yours, vs/j 828 FRONT STREET. R O. BOX 803 GREENPORT. NY 11944 October 18, 1988 Southold Town Clerk Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re: George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokano$ Change of Zone Application SCTM #1000-75-1-16 Dear Ms. Terry: I am in receipt of the Planning Board's letter of October 18, 1988, wherein it recommends that the above-referenced application be denied. The basis of the Planning Boards recommendation is the proposed Master Plan's zoning for this parcel. To base a re- con~endation upon proposed ordinances which may never be adopted is both erroneous and unlawful. The realities of the situation are that this parcel is, and has for a substantial period of time, been used for business purposes. These uses include the rental of one of the buildings to the Town of Southold. The proposed change of zone merely validates that which already exists. Any denial of this application based on the proposed Master Plan is contrary to the law and will be treated as such. Very tru u · JKM/lmt ~ cc: Southold Town Plannin~ Board JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1fi01 Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of 5outhold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Department of Planning: X New Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Zoning Cod~ Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone) Location of affected land: north side Route 25, east of Peconic Lane, Peconic. Suffolk County Tax Map No.: Within 500 feet of: 1000-075-01-16 The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park. X The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel owned by the County or for which the County has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. Or within one mile of.', Nuclear power plant. Airport COMMENTS: Recommendation of Southold Town Planning Board is attached hereto. Date: October 18, 1988 ~// ' - -- Judith T. T~y Southold Town" Clerk Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 18, 1988 Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold, NY 11971 RE- George Kokkinos & Steve Tsokanos Change of Zone SCTM #1000-75-1-16 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 17, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board to denie this proposal for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Argricultural District to "B-l" General Business District located at Route 25, Peconic. In reviewing this application the Board finds it inconsistant with the Master Plan and the Board would be within the plan if they recommend deniel. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Ver~5~t ruly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. ~/- CHAIRMAN ce: Kevin McLaughlin, Att. jt Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 $outhold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (S16) 765-1938 ~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 18, 1988 Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold, NY 11971 RE: George Kokkinos & Steve Tsokanos Change of Zone SCTM 91000-75-1-16 Dear Mrs. Terry: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, October 17, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board recommend to the Town Board to denie this proposal for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Argricultural District to "B-i" General Business District located at Route 25, Peconic. In reviewing this application the Board finds it inconsistant with the Master Plan and the Board would be within the plan if they recommend deniel. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI , JR. ~ CHAIRMAN cc: Kevin McLaughlin, Att. jt 828 FRONT STREET, R O. BOX 803 GREENPORT, NY 11944 October 12, 1988 Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Geroge Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos Petition for Change of Zone Dear Judy: With reference to the above-captioned matter, enclosed herewith please find check from Mr. Kokkinos in the sum of $2~0.00 to cover the fee for Mr. Emilita's review. me. JKM/lg Enclosure If you have any questions please do not hesitate to Very ~ru~/~,X/ contact TOWN CLERK ~ TOWN OF $OUTHOLD i ~,o~ c,,..~, New Yo,k s~6- ?6s.,.o~ N.° 282~7 · i > J.dilh ~[re~, To~ Clerk ~ _ ~ _:_ ~ ~_ ~ :---- _ ~.'~__ _ :___ ~ __ ~ JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 7, 1988 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. P. O. Box 803 Greenport, New York 11944 Dear Kevin: In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Quality Review, of the Code of the Town of Southold, the Town Board has engaged the services of Planner David Emilita to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form submit by you with respect to the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone. The cost of this review is $210.00 and must be paid prior to Mr. Emilita commencing his work. Please send a check in the amount of $210.00, payable to the Southold Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed with process- ing this petition. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 7, 1988 Town Ha11,53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos requesting a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-I" General Business District, at Route 25, Peconic. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations, and transmit the same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Attachment JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 October 7, 1988 David J. S. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner Szepatowski Associates Inc. 23 Narragansett Avenue Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 Dear Dave: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on October 4, 1988, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQR review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone, at the agreed cost not to exceed $210.00. Petition and pertinent maps, etc. are enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold, New York 1 [971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 4, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby engages the services of Planner David Emilita, at a cost not to exceed $210.00, to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos for a change of zone; said review to include applicant's Part I, prepare a Part II and III, draft a proposed declaration, including a field inspection; the cost of said review to be paid by the applicants prior to the commencement of the review. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk October 6, 1988 JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPItONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 4, 1988: WHEREAS, a petition has been received from George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos requesting a change of zone on certain property located on the north side of Route 25, east of Peconic Lane, Peconic, from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "B-I" General Business District; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and the Suffolk County Charter. ~.- Terry Southold Town Clerk October 6, 1988 CASE NO: .......~..~...~.. ...... STATE CF NE%V YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PETITION IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FOR A CliANGE, AIODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDLW- ANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUI~TY, NE%V YORK. TO TI-IE TOWN BOARD OF TI-~ TOWN OF SOUTI-IOLD: 1. I, George Kokkinos and Steven residin~ at Peconic Lane~ Peconic · .: ................................ :..~ ............................................................................... (uzsert name of petitioner) ~so~ands ~ Suffolk Count)', New York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at .............................................................. and more particularly bounded and described as follows: See Exhibit "A" annexed hereto 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone l%Iaps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: To change the zoning district on said property from residential (A) to general business district (B-l). Such request is made for thc following reasons: The premises presently are improved by three buildings. The building variously house a garage for the Town of Southold, a canvas shop with an apartment upstairs, a florist shop and a storage area. All such uses are valid preexisting business uses. The change to a business zone would merely recognize the situation as it exists, that the property is, and has been for a substantial period of time, utilized for business purposes. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) (L. S.) GEORGE KOKKINOS STEVEN TS6KkNOS George Kokkinos a.n.d...S.t..e.v..e.n...T.s..o.k. 9.n.o..s.,...b.9.t.h' ............. BEING DULY S\VORN, deposes and says that theyare they have x~cY~3~the pe%{tione~in the %%'{thin aetiou; that~ read the £oregoin~ Peri/ion and know the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (herD own knowledge, except as to the matters thevbelieve therein stated to be alleged Oll information and belief, and th~s to those matters ~6~o~F,~,'~ it to be true. GEORGIa. ~OKKINOS STEVEN TSOKANOS Sworn to b/fore me ....... ..... Notary Public, LAU~I~ E. GAAEB NNNoM~.o. Public, State ~ New ~ . ~21818, Suffolk ~unW Term Expires September 30, 1988 TITLI~ NO. 8608-731432 SCHEDULE A - Description ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York,'more bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a monument on the westerly side of Main Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) at the eouthwesterly corner of the premises herein described and which said point is also the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Lillian A. Goselski; RUNNING THENCE North 40 degrees, 17', West'253.80 feet to a foundation monument; RUNNING THENCE North 49 degrees, 54', East 188.80 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE the following 2 courses and distances: (1) South 37 degrees, 54', East 181.24 feet to a monument; (2) South 40 degrees, 09', East 47.57 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE along the west side of Main Road, South 42 degrees, 00', West 182.80 feet to the point or place of BEGINNING. S DESCRIPTION TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the blatter of the Petition of GEORGE KOKKINOS and STEVEN TSOKANOS to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: Lillian A. Gozelski 60rton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 Frank Chichanowicz 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 III NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersi3ned to petition the Town Board of the Town of 5outhold to requesta chan~e of zone from residential to a general business district (B-l). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- ,'ribed as follows: Tax Map No. 1000-075-01-16, Main Road, at: Pe¢onio, Town of Southoldt County of Suffolk and State of New York. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A zone (Residential - Aqricultural) 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: B-1 Zone (General Business) 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of $outhold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Post Office Address: 828 Front Streetr PO Box 803 EN~SOKANOS -- Greenport, NY 11944 (516) 477-1016 NAME PROOF OF Xl-\IL1,NG OF-- NOTIC~ ADDRESS Lillian A. Gozelski Frank Chichanowicz III 60rton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 STATE OF NEW YORK : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.: Laurie E. Graeb ,residin§at Old Jule Lane, Mattituck, NY , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3rd day of October ,19 8 8 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on the reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov -named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were rnailed at the United States Post Office at Mattituckf New York ;that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) ~ mail LAURIE E. GRAEB .,- ~ '~'1',~-16-2 (2187)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full FAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full FAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information ~ecorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The proiect will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible O/ricer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (Ii: different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed change of zone for George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 'r'ax Map Number Main Road at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-075-01-16 NAME OF APPUCANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE J. Kevin McLaughlin, as attorney (516) 477-1016 ~E~ront Street, PO Box 803, CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Greenport NY 11944 NAME OF OWNER (If different) George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ) ADDRESS Main Road CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Peconic NY 11958 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Change of zone from (A) residential-agricultural to B-1 (general business Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proiect, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: I'-IUrban I'qlndustrial EZCommercial f'-lResidential (suburban) fqRural (non-farm) I-IForest fqAgriculture [-1Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1. 0194 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces .33 acres .33 acres Other (Indicate type), lawn area .67 acres .67 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? a. Soil drainage: I-IWell drained % of site r-IModerately well drained % of site I~Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres· (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4 Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? []Yes ~]No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of pr sed project site with slopes: I~0-10% % []10-15% []15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I~Yes ~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? r~Yes I~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? [~Yes F~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? E3Yes E~Ho According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) rqYes E]~.N o Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? I-lYes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I~Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by~xisting public utilities;~ ]~]Yes r~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? None b. Size (In acres) ~Yes [~No already connected E]Yes I~No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? r~Yes [~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [~Yes ~]No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes Q~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) 1.0194 a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor b. Project acreage to be developed: ~ acres initially; 1. 0194 c. Project acreage to remain undeve!oped acres d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) 182.80 feet e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: n/a One Family Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately .e..x..i, ~ .t. i n g i Dimensions (in feet) of largest ~sg~t~d structure2 gtor~eight, 56 width; j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 182.8 acres. acres ultimately. Condominium 80 length. ft. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from t~e site? n/a :~. How much natural material 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? []Yes I~No []N/A a. If yes, for what intend~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [Yes I~No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I-lYes I~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n/a acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? E3Yes EgNo 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? [Yes [No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? I~Yes I~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction n/a ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/a 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? fqYes [~o If yes, explain tons/cubic yards year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? I~Yes f~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste {sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? :~]Yes fqNo Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain [qYes ~]No 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? []Yes []No Will the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes I~No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons - less than 1 b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? [~Yes E3No c. If yes, give name Southold Town Land Fill ; location Peconic d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, exptain I-lyes ~No Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? Will project use herbicides or pesticides? fqYes [qYes tons/month. years. E:~No Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? I~Yes ~No Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? [Yes Will proiect result in an increase in energy use? [l-lYes r3]No If yes , indicate type(s) [~No 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity 23. Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [Yes If Yes, explain gallons/minute. I~No 4 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City. Town, Village Board I~Yes [:]No City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes [~No City, Town Zoning Board I~Yes [~No City, County Health Department ~lYes I~No Other Local Agencies E3Yes [~No Other Regional Agencies I~Yes I~No State Agencies [qYes I~No Federal Agencies [qYes f~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? I~Yes [qNo If Yes, indicate decision required: [~zoning amendment E3zoning variance [qspecial use permit I~subdivision ~]site plan [~new/revision of master plan [qresource management plan E3other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? presently zoned A 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? present use 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 General Business District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? same as present use 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ][]Yes 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/~ mile radius of proposed action? E3No B Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ',~ mile? ~Yes f-lNo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~./a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts~ [:]Yes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? [:3Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? [~Yes ONo 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [qYes [~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic~ [:]Yes ONo- D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification , ,/, · I certify that the inf.orrr~tio~-~rovi~d~ve is true to the best of m~ ~.o~,ed~e. Signature __~~ ~ f'~3~ T[Ue Attorney and .' the a~s~he Coastal Are~nd y~u~e a state agency, complete ,he Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with thi~e~ent. 5 828 FRONT STREET, 1~ O. BOX 803 GREENPORT, NY 11944 ~5161 477-1016 October 4, 1988 Southold Town Clerk Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 OOT, Re: Change of Zone Application George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos Dear Town Clerk: I have enclosed an application for a change of zone on behalf of my clients, George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos. JKM/lmt Enclosure Very~ ~u~s~ .... sr,,TE NmV YO= TO,V:, Or RECeiVED OCT' 4 '~988 PETITION IN TI~E BIATTEB OF TB~ PETITION OF FOR A ClLA-NGE, 5IODIFICATION OR AAfENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDL~- ANCE OF THE TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLI~ COUINTY, NE%V YORK. TO T1TE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. I, ..G. eorg..e...K..o, kkinos and Steven residi-~ at Peconic Lane~ ..P. econic (mse~": '""" "name' '" -'"""""7'Y'"'"'"""of petitioner) Tso~ands'"" '"' "=' '"'"'-"'"'""'"'"'"""" '"" '"'"'"'""' Suffo]k County, Ne%v York, the undersigned, am the owner of certain real property situated at .............................................................. and more particularly bounded and described as follows: See Exhibit "A" annexed hereto.. 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Tow. of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York,. including the Building Zone l~faps heretofore made a part thereof, as follo%vs: To change the zoning district on said property from residential (A) to general business district (B-l). ,/ Suchrequestis made forthe following reasons: The premises presently are improved by three buildings. The building variously house a garage for the Town of Southold, a canvas shop with an apartment upstairs, a florist shop and a storage area. All such uses are valid preexisting business uses. The change to a business zone would merely recognize the situation as it exists, that the property is, and has been for a substantial period of time, utilized for business purposes. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) GEORGE KOKKINOS 'S %vEVEN TSOKANOS George Kokkinos a.n.d...S.t..e.v..e.n...T.s..o.k..a.n.o..s.,...b.9.t.h' ............. BEING DULY SWORN. deposes and says that theyare · they have X.lf~;~the petitionerSin the within -etlon; thatxlg~ read the foregoing Petition and knov:g- the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) Own knowledge, except as to the matters theybelieve there{tx stated, to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters Rg:~lg,~g'~ it to be true. GEORGE KOKKINOS Sworn to before me N*otar7 Public. LAURIE E. GRAEB Notary Public, State of New York No. 4821818, Suffolk County Term Expires $eptem~r 30, 1988 (L. S.) ~ STEVEN TSOKANOS ~',- ~' ' ¢~1'4-16-2 (2/87)--7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQF Purpose: The full FAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and ~ Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part1 [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information ~'ecorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could ha~,e a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The proiect may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or ]'ype Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Oificer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant e/f( on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be consider as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additior information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invol new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and spec each instance. NAME OF ACTION Proposed change of zone for George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos LOCATION OF ACTrON (Include Street Address, Municipality and County) Tax Map Number Main Road at Peconic, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk 1000-075-01-16 NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR J. Kevin McLaughlin, as attorney BUSINESS TELEPHONE (516) 477-1016 ~E~ront Street, PO Box 803, CI~IPO } STATE I ZIPCODE Greenport NY 11944 NAME OF OWNER (If different) George Kokkinos and Steven Tsokanos BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( ~ ADDRESS Main Road CITY/PO I STATE J ZIP CODE Peconic NY 11958 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Change of zone from (A) residential-agricultural to B-1 (general busines~ Please Complete Each Question-Indicate M.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: r-lUrban [~lndustrial [~Commercial [Residential (suburban) [~Rural (non-fan [-IForest []Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 1. 0194 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENT[',' AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or grushland (Non-agricultural} acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres _ . acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) _ acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill} _ acres acres Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces . 33 _ acres . 33 acres Other (Indicate type), lawn area .67 _ acres .67 acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? a. Soil drainage: ~WeJ[ drained % of s.~te [Moderately ~ell drained % of site []Poorly drained ~ % oi site b. Jf any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified w,thin sod group I through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? acres. (See I NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? I~Yes ~{~]No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 '~'~:' '5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: [0-10% 100 % [10-15% % [15% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ~]Yes [~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? l-lYes f~No 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? I~Yes [~[No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? I-lyes [~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? r~Yes [~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [Yes [~[No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? r-lyes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? DYes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: None a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name 17. Is the site served by-~xisting p_ublic utilities? ]~]Yes JqNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? None b. Size (In acres) [2lYe s []No already connected []Yes []No 18. is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2S-AA, Section 303 and 304? [Yes ~]No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 [Yes [~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes [~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor '1 . 0194 b. Project acreage to be developed: _1~33_.1_9_~ acres initially; 1. 0194 c. Proiect acreage to remain undeve!ol~ed acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) 182o80 feet e If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a 9/0; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed _ g. Maximum vehicular tr,ps generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units' One Famdy Two Family Multiple Family Initially Ultimately existing i Dimensions (in feet) of largest g~Y,~d structure~eight; 56 w,dth; ). Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project ~,11 occup,,, is? 182.8 acres ultimately. Condominium 80 length. ft. 3 · ' tons/cubic yards 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ll/a 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [Yes (No []N/A a. If yes, for what intend~,~ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~lYes (No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes (No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? n/a acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? [Yes (gNu 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction n/a months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: n/a a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [Yes l/No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction rl/a ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n/a __. 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [Yes [~o If yes, explain month __ year, (including demolition). month year. ~lYes (No 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? r~Yes L~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ~3Yes r~No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain [Eh'es [gNu 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? [~Yes [g]No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ~]Yes E]No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons - le$$ than 1 b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? P3Yes (No c. If yes, give name Southold Town Land Fill ; location Peconic d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes, explain ~No 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site ]ife? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~JYes UYes E~o tons/month years. E2r~N o 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dayl? []Yes [~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? E3¥'es 21. Will project result in an increase in energy u~e? [Z]Yes (No If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity __ gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day gallons/day. ~ 24. Does prolect involve Local, State or Federal funding? (E/Yes [~No If Yes, explain [~No 4 25. App~:ov'al~ I~equired: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Village Board [~Yes E]No City, Town, Village Planning Board [~Yes [~No City, Town Zoning Board E]Yes r~No City, County Health Department [~Yes Other Local Agencies I-lYes ~No Other Regional Agencies E3Yes ~No State Agencies E]Yes [~No Federal Agencies [Yes [~No C. Zoning and Planning Information I. Does proposed action irwolve a planning or zoning decision? [~Yes E]No If Yes, indicate decision required: []{zoning amendment F'lzoning variance I-Ispecial use permit E~subdivision E]site plan E]new/revision of master plan E]resource management plan [other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? presentl~ zoned A. 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? present use 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 General Business District 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? same as present use 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? OYes 7 What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ¼ mile radius of proposed action? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ¼ mile? BYes ['-IN 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization{s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? [Yes ~IN, 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police fire protection)? [Yes [~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle pro]ectec~ demand? []Yes [No 12 Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [Yes [2~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E}Yes E]No. D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your proiect. If there are or may be any advers~ impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate avoid them E. Verification '~ ~o ,,I I certify that the inf,orn~at' ~rovi.~e-6~'(/ove is true tO the best o~ m~ knowledge. , 5ignatur~ ~.'~.L_~__~.~ ]~j~ Title ~ttorney and Aqent I~ Ibc a~on is i~he Coastal A~eakand you a~e a state agency, complete I~e Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceeding with fhi~ass~smenl. 5 TITL£ NO. 8608-731432 ,SCHEDULE A - Description ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State of New York, more bounded and described as follows: BECINNING at a monument on the westerly side of Hain Road (N.Y.S. Route 25) at the southwesterly corner of the premises herein described and which said point is also the southeasterly corner of land now or formerly of Lillian A. Coselski; RDNNIN¢ THENCE North 40 degrees, 17', West-253.80 feet to a fouudation monument; RUNNING THENCE North 49 degrees, 54', East 188.80 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE ~he following 2 courses and distances: (1) South 37 degrees, 54', East 181.24 feet to a monument; (2) South 40 degrees, 09', East 47.57 feet to a monument; RUNNING THENCE along the west side of Main Road, South 42 degrees, 00', West 182.80 fee£ to the point or place of BEGINNING. DESCRIPTION TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF $OUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of GF. ORGE KOKKINOS and STEVV. N TSOKANOS to thc Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: Lillian A. Gozelski 60rton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 Frank Chichanowicz III 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to requesta change of zone from residential to a general business district (B-l). 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribeda~foIlows: Tax Map No. 1000-075-01-16, Main Road, at Peconic, Town of Southoldt County of Suffolk and State of New York. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: A zone (Residential - Aqricultural) -- 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: B-1 Zone (General Business) 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of SouthoId and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: ~t 1988 /~,~,/,~EN ~fSOKANOS · , Post Office Address: 828 Front Street, PO Box 803 Greenport, NY 11944 (516) 477-1016 NAME PROOF OF 'dAli I ,G OF NOTIC[ ADDRESS Lillian A. Gozelski Frank Chichanowicz III 60rton Drive East Northport, NY 11731 180 Main Road Peconic, NY 11958 STATE OFNEWYORK : COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.: Laurie E. Graeb , residing at Old Jule Lane, Mattituck, NY , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 3rd day of October ,19 88 , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth on tile reverse side hereof, directed to each of the abov -named persons at the addresses set opposite their respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the addresses of said persons as shown on the cur- rent assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were raailed at the United States Post Office at Mattituck, New York ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (.t=~_-__~ __", mail. GRA~B 17.2 - 18.2 -- 19 -- 20. - LILLIAN A. GOZELSKI G ORTON DR. EAST NORTHPORT,N.Y. 11731 AGNES REINHART C/O HOWARD REINHART lO? LONG BEACH RD. ST. JAMES, N.Y. 11780 FRANK CHICHANOWlCH Ill , 180 MAIN ROAD , PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 FRANK CHICHANOWICZ III , 180 MAIN ROAD, PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 CURT W. & ANO MEYHOEFER P.O. 80X 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 CURT W. & ANO MEYHOEFER P.O. BOX. 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 STANLEY 8. BERKOSKI &WIFE , MAIN ROAD , SOUTHOLD ,N.Y. 11971 BARR VINEYARB LTD , BOX. 287 , CUTCHOGUE , N.Y. 11935 500' ~ ~ LIC. NO. 4,9668 ~YO ~ P.C. MAIN ~ SOUTHOL[ I 500 , 1000 - 075 - 06 - AREA = 1. 0194 ACRES APPLICANTS , GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS 435 PECONIC LANE PECONIC ~ N.Y. II958 3. -- JOHN G. SCOTT , III & WIFE ,BOX. 545 MAIN ROAD , CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11958 4. -- EDWIN SLIVONIK , PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 5. __ VERONICA STANKEWlCZ & ORS RFP MAIN ROAD 1 SOUTHOLD 1 N,Y. 11971 6 -- APOLONIA STANKEWICZ RFD , MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y, 11971 12. _ ROSE SABOTKA , BOX 255 , PECONIC N.Y. 11958 1000 - 086 - 01 - 10.9 -- SIMON EST CHARLES J. C/O ELIZABETH WURTZ , BOX. HORTONS PT., SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 122, RADIUS MAP FOR GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS AT PECONIC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N..Y. 075 - SCALE 1" = 60' JULY 13, 1988 1000 - 01 16 HERESY CERTIFYY HA~-T DE, GCRIBE THE USES 0 1¢E ROPERTY 6 86 - 668 B KEY MAP SCALE I" = 600' ~.S. LIC. NO. ~'?l P.C. ,,/ 500' 49668 500 , AREA = 1. 0194 ACRES APPLICANTS' GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS 435 PECONIC LANE PECONIC , N.Y. II95B AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL 5 KEY MAP SCALE I"= SO0' 1000 075 - O1 15 I -- LILLIAN A. GOZELSKI G ORTON DR. EAST NORTHPORT,N.Y. 11731 ID. - AGNES REINHART C/O HOWARD REINHART 107 LONG BEACH RD. ST. JAMES, N.Y. 11780 17,1 - FRANK CHICHANOWICH III , 17.2 - FRANK CHICHANOWlCZ III , IB.I - CURT W. & ANO MEYHOEFER N.Y. 11971 18.2 - CURT W. & ANO MEYHOEFER N. Y. 11971 180 MAIN ROAD , PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 180 MAIN ROAD, PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 P.O. BOX 317 MAIN ROAD, $OUTHOLD P.O. BOX. 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, STANLEY B. BERKOSKI &WIFE , MAIN ROAD , SOUTHOLD ,N.Y. 11971 BARR VINEYARD LTD , BOX. 287 , CUTCHOGUE , N.Y. 11935 1000 075 - 06 3. -- JOHN G. SCOTT , III & WIFE ,BOX. 545 MAIN ROAD , CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. II95B 4. -- EDWIN SLIVONIK , PECONIC ,N.Y. 1195B 5. _ VERONICA STANKEWICZ & ORS RFD MAIN ROAD , SOUTHOLD N.Y. 1197l 6 __ APOLONIA STANKEWICZ RFD , MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y, II971 12. _ ROSE SABOTKA , BOX 255 , PECONIC N.Y. 1195B 1000 - 086 - 01 - SIMON EST CHARLES J. C/O ELIZABETH WURTZ , BOX. HORTONS PT. , SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 RADIUS MAP FOR GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS lOOO AT PECONIC TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N..Y. 075 SCALE 1" = 60' JULY 13, 1988 Ol - 16 I DO' HEREBY CERTIFY 7- .4 THE RADIUS MA/= DOES C ~RA TEL Y / 6 86 - 668 B 500~ ~ L__C. NO. SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 49668 '%. // ooO AREA = 1. 0194 ACRES APPLICANTS GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS 435 PECONIC LANE PECONIC ~ N.Y. II958 KEY SCALE 1000 ~ 075 - 01 - 15.1 -- LILLIAN A. GOZELSKI 60RTON DR. EAST NORTHPORT,N.y. 11731 16. AGNES REINHART C/O HOWARD REINHART 107 LONG BEACH RD. ST. JAMES, N.Y. 11780 17.1 -- FRANK CHICHANOWICH III , 180 MAIN ROAD , PECONIC , N.Y. 11958 17.2 - FRANK CHICHANOWICZ Iii , 180 MAIN ROAD, PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 18.1 - CURT W. &ANO MEYHOEFER P.O. BOX 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD N.Y. 11971 18.2 - CURT W. & ANO MEYHOEFER P.O. BOX. 317 MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N. Y. 11971 19 -- STANLEY B. BERKOSKI & WIFE , MAIN ROAD , SOUTHOLD ,N.Y 11971 20. - BARR VINEYARD LTD , BOX. 287 , CUTCHOGUE , N.Y. 11935 1000 075 06 - 3. -- JOHN G. SCOTT , III & WIFE ,BOX. 545 MAIN ROAD CUTCHOGUE, N. Y. 11958 ' 4. -- EDWIN SLIVONIK , PECONIC ,N.Y. 11958 5. __ VERONICA STANKEWlCZ & ORS RFD MAiN ROAD ,SOUTHOLD ,NY. 11971 G _ APOLONIA STANKEWICZ RFD , MAiN ROAD, SOUTHOLD~ N.Y, 11971 12. _ ROSE SABOTKA , BOX 255 , PECONIC N.Y. 11958 1000 - O86 - 01 - ~0.9 -- SIMON EST CHARLES J. C/O ELIZABETH HORTONS PT. , SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 WURTZ , BOX. 122, RADIUS MAP FOR GEORGE KOKKINOS & STEVEN TSOKANOS 1000 AT PECONIC TOWN OF $OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N..Y. O75 SCALE 1" = 60' JULY 13, 1988 01 16 I DO HE/R£BY CERTIFY T~ ~A THE RAiD/US M,4p Do~$T~Ac~uR,4 TEL Y DESCRISt£ THE USES 0~/ TH£ pROPERTy $URROUINDING THE $UgJECT PREMISES MAP 1 6 86 - 668 B