Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHarbor View RealtyCAS~. ~¢0: ~/~C~ .......... STATE CF IqE~V YOtlIK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~EGEIVED PETITION IN THE 5IATTER OF THE PETITION OF HARBORVIEW REALTY CO. FOR A CiL%~'~'GE, IIODIFICATION OR AAIEND.%IE~T OF THE BULLDL'qG ZONE ORDL'q- AA'CE OF TI-IE TOIVN OF SOUTHOLD, SU-FFOLI< COUNTY, NE%V YORK. TO TPIE TOWN BOARD OF TITE TOIVN OF SOUT/-IOLD: 1. 1~ 'Harborview Realt~ Co. residin~ at ..3..0...0.....R.-~..~.r.Q....D..~.J.Y.¢-., ................ (inser~ name of petitioner) Hauppauge, NY 11787 S~ffolk County, Ne%v York, the undersigned, am the o%vner of certain real property situated at Greenport, Town of Southold, guffolk County, New York and more particularly bounded and described as follows: SEE ATTACHED 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, mod~y and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the To%vn of Southold, Suffolk County, Ne%v York, including the Building Zone AIaps heretofore made a part thereof, as follows: Change of zoning designation of the above described parcel from "A" Residential-Agricultural Zoning Use District to M-1 General Multiple Residence District. $, Such request is made for the following reasons: The zoning change sought is limited to 24.95± acres of an 83.00± acre parcel owned by the applicant. The application, accordingly, is limited to the easterly end of the parcel which is presently improved with 31 existing cottages. The remaining 5B± acres are proposed for dedication to nature, forever wild. The action proposed would constitute, good planning & zoning in the best in- terest of the Town of Southold and its residents. (L. s.) ~~ BY/ C£x~ora ~uao£pn, General Partner STATE OF NE\V YORK, ) ) SS:- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, ) ............ .CI~.I~'~QI~.D...R,U..D.O..L.P..H ............ BEING DUL%2 SWORN, deposes and says that / a Genera& yar~ner-ln uarmorvlew Realty co. he is/the petitioner in the within action; that he has read the ~oregoln~' Petition and. knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged un information and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. (L. BEGINNING at a point in the southwesterly line of the land now or formerly of Posillico Construction Co., Inc., which point is the following courses and distances from point of intersection of the southeasterly line of the land of the Long Island Rail Road with the southwesterly line of the land of James Posillico: i. S. 45° 21~ 46" E. 205.42 feet to a point in the south- westerly line of the land of James Posillico, 2. S. 55° 49' 26" E. 1875.99 feet along the southwesterly lines of the lands of James Pisil ico and of Posillico Construction 6o., Inc., and running thence from'said point of beginning S. 55° 49' 26" E. along the southwesterly line of the land of Posillico Construction Co., Inc. 859.77 feet to the land now or formerly of Anesthesia Group; thence S. 39° 35' 10" E. along the southwesterly lines of the lands of now or formerly of Anesthesia Group and of now of formerly of WilIiam]J. ~chneider 1559.41 feet to a point in the approximate mean high water mark. of Shelter Island Sound; thence generally westerly, northeasterly, northwesterly, southwesterly and again northwesterly along approximate high water marks ann along a wooden bulkhead of Shelter Island Sound and of a "basin" off Shelter Island Sound to a point in the easterly line of land now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner, said point being the following courses and distances as measured along aforesaid approximate high water mark and along a bulkhead the following courses and distances: I. S. 81° 29' 38".W. 21.81 feet 2. N. 74~ 33' 18" W. 51.30 feet 3. N. 66° 24' 48" W. 47.68 feet 4. N. 70~ 42' 04" W. 96.13 feet 5. S. 89~ 20' 28" W. 70.96 feet 6. S. 31~ 18' 45" W. Ii.31 feet 7. N. 64° 40' 01" W. 197.34 feet 8. N. 64° 37' 42" W. 380.06 feet 9. N. 64° 32' 31" W. 289.24 feet lO. S. 76° 09' 50" W. 43.85 feet 11. N. 64° 27' 27" W. 220.43 feet 12. N. 17° I0' 37" W. 36.68 feet 13. N. 68° 17' 05" W. 308.25 feet 14. N. 35° 02' 49" E. 15. N. 69° 08' 00" E. 37.16 feet 16. N. 83° 44' 07" E. 22.45 feet 17. N. 45° 28' 13" E. 22.99 feet 18. N. 1° 13' 46" E. 54.52 feet 19. N. 18° 28' 55" W. 178.54 feet 20. N. 31° 30' 56" W. 40.19 feet 21. N. 67° 19' 26" W. 36.31 feet 22. S. 70° 40' 38" W. 37.59 feet 23. S. 27° 53' 33" W. 29.58 feet 24. S. 0° 16' 23" W. 73.63 feet 25. S. 4° 51' 27" W. 146.85 feet, 26. S. 3° 07' 36" W. 168.58 feet, 27. S. 36° 26' 28" E. 25.57 feet, 28. S. 7° 04' 51" W. 109.75 feet, 29. N. 49° 17~ 24" W. 40.93 feet, 30. N. 2° 15' 32" E. 31.60 feet, 31. N. 48° 14' 49" W. 61.23 feet, 32. N. 57° 36' 28" W. 32.07 feet; thence N. 4° 11" 12" E. along the easterly line of the land now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner 771.06 feet to the land of Harbor- view Landing Realty Co.; thence N. 4° 11' 12" E. through the land of Harborview Landing Realty Co. 361.44 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing an area of 25.0 acres, more or less.. Scoping Session Harborview Landing Change of Zone .May 26, 1988 Present were David Emilita,'Diane Schultze, Lisa Marino and Barbara Szepatowski of Szepatowski Associates, Inc. (SAI), Jean Celender for the applicant and staff member from her office, the appli~ant, and Mel~ssa Spiro, Planner from the Town of Southold Planning Board. The purpose of this meeting was to advise the applicant what would be required in the DBIS for the proposed change of zone. Mr. Emilita advised that the following would need to be included in the DEIS from the scoping checklists I. Cover Sheet II. Table of Contents and Summary III. Description of.the Proposed Action A. -Project Purpose, Need and Benefits 1-4 B. -Location Items 1-4 C. -Design and Layout Items 1-4 D. -Construction and Operation Items 1-2 F. -Approvals Items 1-2 It was noted that depending on approvals, construction woul~ be not more than 1 construction season, however, if it were more there would be concern about layover. IV. Environmental Setting A. Geology 2. Surface items a-e 3. Topography a 2" interval is acceptable SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. [NViRONKa£NTA[ CONSULTAK~t'~ B. Water Resources Groundwater items a-b Surface water items a-d The surface water to be discussed includes the water to 'the East of the existing access road and the water quality within the Bay. D. Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology items 1-3 E. Agricultural Resources - are not required to be addressed. Human Resources A. Transportation Transportation items a-b. Traffic counts are required for Main Road (Rt. 25) and Sage Blvd., Kerwin and Main Road (Rt. 25) and August Acres road intersection with Kerwin. It was noted that the spur road from the August Acres subdivision road will be the main access into the site and the access from Sage Blvd. to Main Road will be secondary. The traffic for the traffic count should be weekend, seasonal traffic. Consideration of existing traffic conditions from the cottages may also be taken into account. It was noted that the marina continues use over the existing right-of-way which they have and will not be allowed to use the proposed right-of-way. There is no right-of-way passage over the existing right-of-way for the existing cottages since they are only seasonal rental units. B. Land Use and Zoning Items 1-3 It was noted that the wetlands in close proximity to the proposed access road should be flagged, however, it would not be necessary to flag the entire site. A mechanism to preserve the "forever wild" land is to be included. The existing land use, adopted master plan, and proposed zoning should be indicated. A public benefit for the change of zone should also be indicated. The project description should show the layout. Community services 2. Police Protection 3. Fire Protection 8. Public Water Supply 1~. Sewage Treatment Facilities SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. £NVIRONM[N]AL CONSUL~N]S S/II These services should be described to the degree that an impact is anticipated. The above four should be discussed in depth and to a lesser degree the following: education facilities, health care facilities, social services, recreational facilities, utilities and solid waste disposal. Demography - there should be a general discussion of this. Cultural Resources 1. Visual Resources items a-c ~ any elevations of the buildings should be included. 2. Historic and Archaeological Resources items a-b. The archaeological resources should include a statement from a recognized source. Us Significant Environmental Impacts - The following should be discussed: - Construction in a flood zone - Dredging - It was noted that there may be dredging to deepen the dock area. - Documentation for Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Village of Greenport. It was agreed that there could be a parallel review of the DEIS and Health Department review. - Rare and endangered species - areas that may be disturbed should be reviewed and discussed. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impact should be discussed. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects should be discussed. VIII. Alternatives Items C-F This should also include a discussion on the existing and proposed zoning, the present application, no action, continuing the existing use, and R-40 zoning. Construction staging and time is not an important consideration. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources should be discussed. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. [NVlRONMEN]AL CONSULTAN1S S/Il 617.21 Appendix State Environmental Quality Review . Scopmg Checklist The following checklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Typically, no one project will require a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this document. Through the scoping process, the list of topics should be refined to reflect~issues unique to the proposed project. Topic areas may be de- leted, added or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final scoping document. The purpose of the checklist format is to idea- tify the basic topic areas of the Draft ElS. This is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a check in the box located to the left of these topics which should be discussed. The model scoping checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including comments, suggestions and identifica- tion of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that, has been checked. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, are issues not associated with the project and may be eliminated from discussion in the Draft ElS. The next step is to expand the list to include or elaborate on those topics unique to the pro- posed project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the checklist for such additional information. The scoping process involves several steps in addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also includes discussions on the quantity and quality of informaton required and the methods of obtain- lng that data. HOTE: This check list was designed to be used in conjunction with the section on scoping contained in SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. It is also important to emphasize that this checklist should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping of a Draft ElS. It should not be used as a substitute for actively scoping Draft ElS for a specific project. I. Cover Sheet All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a cover sheet that includes: A. Whether it is a draft or final statement 13. Hame or other descriptive title of the project C. Location (county and town, ~illage or city) of the project D. Hame and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the state- ment and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Hame and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft ElS (3. In the case of a Draft ElS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated ~-11. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are re- quired for Draft and Final EIS's. The summary should include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant, beneficial and adverse im- pacts, (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) ~'III. Description of the Proposed Action Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the draft ElS. [] A. PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history 2.Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on ad- opted community developments plans 3.Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a.) social b.) economic ~ B. LOCATION 1.Establish geographic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3.Description of existing zoning of proposed site 4. Other: ~ C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1 .Total site area a.) proposed impervious surface area (roofs, parking lots, roads) b.) amount of land to be cleared c.) open space 2. Structures ~ a.) gross leaseable area (GLA), if applicable b.) layout of buidings (attached, enclosed, separate) c.) site plans and profile view d.) material storage e.) drainage plans f.) above/underground pipelines g.) staging area for material handling 3. Parking a.) pavement area b.) number of spaces and layout 4.Other: ~"'D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ] .Construction a.) tote! construction period anticipated b.) schedule of construction c.) future potential development, on site or on adjoining properties d.) other: 2. Operation a.) type of operation b.) schedule of operation c.) other: '"~_. CLOSLiRE A;iD 7CST CLCSUR,'- PL~.NS (for projects of planned limited life such as landfills) [~'~F. APPROVALS 1. Required changes or variances to the zoning regulations 2.Other permit approval or funding reguirements IV. Environmental Setting Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the Draft ElS. ral Resource · GEOLOGY a.) composition and thickness of subsurface material examples: --depth to, and nature of, bedrock formations and impermeable layers --occurrence of an extractive mineral resource --usefulness as construction material 2.b.) earthquake potential Surface a.) List of soil types b.) discussion of soil characteristics examples: --physical properties (indication of soils hydrological (infiltration capabilities) ~engineering properties (soil bearing capacity) --agricultural properties (soil profile characteristics) when agri- cultural land resources are involved c.) distributior, of soil types at project site d.) suitability for use examples: --agriculture --construction --mining [~ e.) other: 3. Topography a.) description of topography at project site examples: --slopes --prominent or unique features b.) description of topography of sur- rounding area [~B. WATER RESOURCES I .Groundwater a.) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: --depth of water table --seasonal variation --quality --quantity --flow b.) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: --location of existing wells --public/private water supply --industrial uses --agricultural uses ( 2.Surface water a.) location and decription of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples: --seasonal variation ~quantity --classification according to ,New York State Department of Health b,) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters examples: --public/private water supply · T-industrial utes --agricultural~uses --recreational c,) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels d. discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutro- phication of water supply [] l ,Climate a.) discussion of seasonal variations and extremes examples: --temperature --humidity --precipitation --wind [] 2.Air quality a,) description o[ existing air quality levels examples: --list the ,National and State Air Quality Standards for the project area and the compliance status for each standard b.) identification of existing sources or pollutants-fixed or mobile c.) identification of any sensitive recepters in project area examples: --hospitals, schools, nursing homes, parks d.) description of existing monitoring D program (if applicable) · TERRESTRAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY I. Vegetation a.) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b.) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance ~age --size --distribution --dominance --community types --unique, rare and endangered species --value as habitat for wildlife --productivity [-] 2.Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife a.) list of fish, shellfish and wildlife species on the project site and within surrounding area, including migatory and resident species b.) discussion of fish, shellfish and wildlife population characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance --distribution --dominance --unique, rare and endangered ~pecies --productivity [] 3. Wetlands a.) list wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b.) discuss wetland characteristics examples: --acreage --vegetative cover --classification --benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control, recreation AG F',~Cq..TG R,'~L RE. SO~ I .Soils a.) list soils by name, slope and soil group ranking within ,NYS Land Classification System (1 ,NYCRR 370) b.) number of acres within each group c.) location of site on soil survey map [] 2.Agricultural land management system(s) a.) inventory o[ existing erosion control and drainage systems examples: --subsurface drain lines --outlet/diversion ditches --strip cropping --diversion terraces b.) relationship of proposed action to existing soil and water conservation plans (if applicable) [] 3.Associated operations a.) number and types of farm operations on and adjacent to site examples: --dairy --grain --orchard b.) type and proximity of farm related facilities examples: --storage units/barns --sorting/packing houses --refrigeration units --roadside markets c.) access to cropland (including detached fiel~ds) d.) access for farm equipment to public roads Human Resources [] A. TRAHSPORTATIOH [] 1. .Transportation services a.) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: --roads, canals, railroads, bridges --parking facilities --traffic control --access/egress from site b.) description of current level of use of services examples: --a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow --vehicle mix --source of existing traffic . a.) description of the current avail- ability of service b.) description of present level of use [] 3. ~',_d ................. [] B. LAIRD USE AMD ZOHIPtG [] ] .Existing land use and zoning a.) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area examples: --commercial --residential --agricultural --business --retail --industrial b.) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area 4 c.) description of any affected agri- cultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site [] 2.Land use plans a.) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b.) discussion of future development trends or pressures [] .3. Other; [] C. COMMUHITY SERVICE (for this section include a list of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs) [] 1. .Educational facilities E~ 2.Police protection [~' 3.Fire protection [] 4.Health care facilities [] 5.Social services [] 6.Recreational facilities [] 7. Utilities ~ 8. Public water supply [] 9.Solid waste disposal ~ ]0.Sewage treatment facilities [] 11 .Other: ~"D. DEMOGRAPHY [] I .Population characteristics a.) discussion of existing population parameters examples: --distribution --density --household size and composition b.) discussion of projections for popu- lation growth [] 2. Other: ~/'E. CULTURAL RESOURCES ~1 .Visual resources a.) description of the physical char· acter of the community examples: --urban vs. rural b.) description of natural areas of significant scenic value c.) identification of structures of significant architectural design · Historic and archaeological resources a.) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or Hational Register or designated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory b.) Identification of sites having potential siq*,ificant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey, if conducted a.) identification of existing level of noise in the community b.) identification of major sources of noise examples ....... airports --major highways --industrial/commercial facilities [] 4. Other: V. Significant Environmental impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental "~1~" ~L setting in Section IV that may be adversely or 'IL'T' beneficially affected by the proposed action and itl require discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environ- mantal Impact. Describe measures to reduce or avoid poten- tial adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Piatural Resource [] A. GEOLOGY ]. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.) use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation c.) other: 2. Surface a.) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b.) minimize disturbance of non- construction sites c.) design and implement soil erosion control plan d.) other: 3. Topography a.) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b,) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c,) other: [] B. WATER RESOURCES ] .Groundwater a.) design/modify system of treatment for stormwater runoff of wastewater prior to recharge of groundwater b.) maintain permeable areas on the 5 c.) institute a program for monitoring water quality in adjacent wells d.) require secondary or tertiary con- tainment of products/wastes e.) contingency plans for'accidental spills f.) other: 2. Surface water a.) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: --hay bales --temporary restoration of vege- tation to disturbed areas --landscaping b.) design adequate stormwater control system c.) constructJmodify sewage treatment facilities d.) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal e,) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources f.) require secondary or tertiary containment of products/wastes g.) contingency plans for accidental spills h.) other: [] C. AIR RESOQRCES 'J. Air quality a,) assure proper construction practices examples: --fugitive dust control --proper operation and mainten- ance of construction equipment b.) design traffic improvements to re- duce congestion and vehicle delay c.) install and ensure the proper operation of emission odor control devices d.) initiate a program for monitoring of air quality e.} other: [] D. TERRESTRALAND AQLIATIC ECOLOGY i. Vegetation a.) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary .b.) preserve part o[site asa natural c.) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d.) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization 2. Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b.) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of fish, shellfish and wildlife cycles ¢.) other: [] E, AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES I. Soils a.) select/design project to avoid viable agricultural land b.) reclaim disturbed agricultural soil profiles for agricultural purposes c.) schedule activity when crops are off fields and soi~ is firm d.) other: 2. Agricultural land management systems a,) re-establish access drives, fence-- lines and any disturbed land management systems b.) re-establish any disturbed erosion control and drainage systems c.) install soil and water management practices to restore or enhance soil drainage and stability d.) preserve open space for agricultural use e.) develop lease back arrangements to allow continued agricultural use on all or portion of site f.) other: Human Resources [] A. TRANSPORTATION I. Transportation a.) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b.) install adequate traffic control devices c.) optimize use of parking areas d.) encourage car pooling and oper- ation of facility during non.peak traffic times e.) design special routing and restricted hours for delivery truck traffic f.) other: 2'. Public transportation a.) adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service the facility b.) encourage use of public transpor- tation by using incentive programs for employees or by selling tickets in facility c.) other: [] B. LAND QSE AND ZONING ! .Existing land use and zoning a.) design project to comply with existing land use plans b.) design functional anti visually appealing facility to s~t standard and precedent for future surround- ing land use c.) other: [] C. COMMUNITY SERVICES !. Police protection a.) minimize local police prote~:{io~ - responsibilities by providing private security force b.) provide security systems, alarms for facility c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 2. Fire protection a.) use construction materials that minimize fire hazards b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 3. Utilities a.) install utility services underground b.) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c.) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design d.) other: [] D. CULTURAL RESOURCES ]. Visual resources a.) design exterior of structure to physically blend with existing surroundings b.) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and signs (consider: height, size, intensity, glare and hours of lighting operation) c.) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding lano uses, parking areas, operational equip- ment and [acilities d.) other: 2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) Prepare a plan. including measures to mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restriction of project activities 6 b.) develop measures to convey cul- tural information to the community (e.g. through scientific/popular reports, displays) c.) preserve architecturally signifi- cant structures and make an adequate permanent photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed d.) other: 3. Noise . a.) schedule construction/operation to occur during "normal business" hours minimizing noise impact during sensitive tiptoes (early morn- ing, night) b.) assure adherence to construction noise standards c.) design berms and landscaping to block and absorb noise d.) other: VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project Is Implemented Identify those adverse environmental effects in Section V that can be expected to occur regard- less of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI. VIII, Alternatives This section contains categories of alterna. fives with examples, Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a compara- tive assessment of costs, benefits and environmen- tal risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alter- native is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which sheuld be included in the ElS by I;lacing a check in the box located to the left of the topic, [] A. ALTERHATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES 1 .Site layout e.) density and location of structures b.) location of access routes, parking and utility routes 2.Orientation a.) compatibility with slope and drainage patterns b.) site size and set back requirements 2 .Technology a.) pollution control equipment b,) innovative vs. proven technologies 4. Mix of activities a) addition of businesses which would affect the operational nature of the facility l. Limiting factors a.) availability of land b.) suitability of alternative site to accomodate design requh'ements c.) availability of utilities d.) suitable market area e.) compatibility with local zoning and master plan f.) compatibility with certified agri- cultural districts g.) compatibility with regional objectives h.) accessibility of site to transporta- tion routes and service population [] C. ALTERNATIVE SIZE 1. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and community needs [] D. ALTERNATIVE £OHSTRUCTIOHI OPERATION SCHEDULING 1.. Commence construction at a different time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule [] E. ALTERHATIVE LAHD USE ] .Suitability of site for other uses a.) other types of commercial uses b.) other types of industry c.) different types of housing d.) agricultural use e.) other: [] F. NO ACTIOH 1 .Impacts of no action a.) effect on public need b.) effect on private developers' need c.) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts [] G. OTHER: IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, convert- ed or made unavailable for future use. ~ .... th !."."=c;,',~ A~p¢~.l.~ (if applicable) Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have, Listed on the next page are examples of topics that are typi- cally alfected by the growth induced by a project. [] A. POPULATIOH 1.Increases in business and resident population due to the creation or relocation of business 2. Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing [] B. SLIPPORT FACILITIES 1. business created to serve the increased population 2.Service industries created to supply new facility [] C. DEVELOPMENT POTEHTIAL !. Introduction or improvement of infra- structure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service[proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infra. structure [] D. OTHER: X~I. Frrecf~ ~.,, ~h.. ~ ..... ,~ Cc. ...... :Z.~ of Energy Resources (if applicable) Identify the energy sources to be used, anticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce energy consumption. The examples listed below are typical issues to be considered when ad- dressing this topic. ~-) A.PROPOSED EHERGY SOLIRCES AND ALTERHATIVES [] B.AbITIClPATED SHORT-TeEM/LOH(3- TER/Vt LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSCJ~PTIOhl [] C.IHDIRECT EFFECTS OH EHERGY CONSCJMPTION 1 .Increased dependence on automobile use 2. Increased levels of traffic due to proposed project [] D.EHERGY CONSERVATION /~EASLJRES I .Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating, cooling and lighting a.) conventional technology examples: --insulation --thermopane windows --use of Iow wattage lights b.) innovative technology examples: --heat pumps --solar panels --wind energy --use of waste heat from an industrial plant --use of recycled materials c.) efficient layout examples: ~orientation of structures in relation to summer and winter sunlight ~clustering of structures to maximize common walls ~shortening of utility runs --shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits a.) location and design of facility to accomodate mass transit . b.) use of shuttle buses c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance [] E.OTHER: Xll. Assessment of (lnavailable Information In certain situations involving major develop- ments (such as an oil supertanker port, a liquid propane/natural gas storage facility, a resource recovery facility or a hazarduous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility), information regarding reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment may not be available. Such informa. tion may be unavailable because the means to ob- tain it are unknown or the cost of obtaining it is exhorbitant, or because there is uncertainty about its validity. If such information is essential to an agency's SEQR finding, the ElS must: A. Identify the nature and relevance of such unavailable or uncertain information; and B. Provide a summary of existing credible scientific evidence , if available; and C. Assess the likelihood of occurrence and consequences of the potential impact, even if the probability is Iow, using the- oretical approaches or research methods generally accepted in the scientific community. This assessment should be applied only where reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment are possible and it is not intended to be applied in the review of such actions as shop- ping malls, residential subdivisions and commer- cial facilities even though the size and scale of some such projects may be extensive. Xlll. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the ElS. A. List of underlyino 'tudies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement B. List all federal, state, regional, or local agencies, organizations, consultants and private L. persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. ReJevent correspondence regarding the projects may be included (required in the Final E~S) Additional Draft ElS Scoping Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft ElS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 July 12, 1988 Planner David Emilita will conduct a Scopin[t Session for preparation of a DEIS on Harborview Realty Co. petition for a change of zone at 11:30 A.M., on Thursday, July 21, 1988 at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, N.Y. Town Board Members Town Attorney Plannincl Boarld; Planner Bldg. Dept.; Trustees Jim McMahon David Emilita ~V41~. N~ew~ sp. apers . ^L Kaoio Station N.Y.S. - DEC Stony Brook & Albany JUDITH T, TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 27, 1988 Town Hail, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TFLEPHONE (5161 765-1801 ILENE: I am forwarding herewith six copies of the change of zone petition with respect to Harborview Realty Co., as well as the Positive Declaration, and Checklist and notes from Dave Emilita's Scoping Session. The formal maps are on file in my office should the Trustees wish to review them. .IUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 27, 1988 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box I 179 Southold. New York 11971 TELEPHONI: {516) 765-180[ To: Commissioner Jorling, DEC, Albany Robert A. Greene, DEC, Stony Brook From: Judith T. Terry, Southold Town Clerk Re: Harborview Realty Co. Change of Zone - SEQR Transmitted herewith is a copy of the scoping checklist and notes from the scoping session on the abovecaptioned change of zone petition. The Positive Declaration with respect to same was transmitted to you on April 19, 1988. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS June 14, 1988 RECEIVED JUN 6 1988 Mrs. Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Harborview Landing Change of Zone Application Dear Judy, Please find enclosed, for your records, a copy of the scoping checklist and notes from the May 26th scoping session for the above mentioned proposal. We will forward a copy of each to Jean Celender as well. Ms. Celender will be preparing the DEIS. Please do not hesistate to contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, PATOWSKI ASSQCIAT$S~- INC. David J.S. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner DJSE:mt Enclosure cc: Jean Celender 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 Scoping Session Harborview Landing Change of Zone May 26, 1988 Present were David Emilita, Diane Schultze, Lisa Marino and Barbara Szepatowski of Szepatowski Associates, Inc. (SAI), Jean Celender for the applicant and staff member from her office, the applicant, and Melissa Spiro, Planner from the Town of Southold Planning Board. The purpose of this meeting was to advise the applicant what would be required in the DEIS for the proposed change of zone. Mr. Emilita advised that the following would need to be included in the DEIS from the scoping checklist: I. Cover Sheet II. Table of Contents and Summary III. Description of the Proposed Action A. -Project Purpose, Need and Benefits B. -Location Items 1-4 C. -Design and Layout Items 1-4 D. -Construction and Operation Items F. -Approvals Items 1-2 1-4 1-2 It was noted that depending on approvals, construction would be not more than 1 construction season, however, if it were more there would be concern about layover. IV. Environmental Setting A. Geology 2. Surface items a-e 3. Topography a 2" interval is acceptable SZ[PATOWSI(I ASSOCIAI'ES INC, ENVIRONMEN1AL CONSUL[ANI'S S/II B. Water Resources 1. Groundwater items a-b 2. Surface water items a-d The surface water to be discussed includes the water the East of the existing access road and the water quality within the Bay. to D. Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology items 1-3 E. Agricultural Resources - are not required to be addressed. Human Resources A. Transportation Transportation items a-b. Traffic counts are required for Main Road (Rt. 25) and Sage Blvd., Kerwin and Main Road (Rt. 25) and August Acres road intersection with Kerwin. It was noted that the spur road from the August Acres subdivision road will be the main access into the site and the access from Sage Blvd. to Main Road will be secondary. The traffic for the traffic count should be weekend, seasonal traffic. Consideration of existing traffic conditions from the cottages may also be taken into account. It was noted that the marina continues use over the existing right-of-way which they have and will not be allowed to use the proposed right-of-way. There is no right-of-way passage over the existing right-of-way for the existing cottages since they are only seasonal rental units. B. Land Use and Zoning Items 1-3 It was noted that the wetlands in close proximity to the proposed access road should be flagged, however, it would not be necessary to flag the entire site. A mechanism to preserve the "forever wild" land is to be included. The existing land use, adopted master plan, and proposed zoning should be indicated. A public benefit for the change of zone should also be indicated. The project description should show the layout. Community services 2. Police Protection 3. Fire Protection 8. Public Water Supply 1 1~. Sewage Treatment Facilities SZEPATOWSKIAS~OCIAt~SINC. ENVIRONMENT&iCONSUL[&NTS These services should be described to the degree that an impact is anticipated. The above four should be discussed in depth and to a lesser degree the following: education facilities, health care facilities, social services, recreational facilities, utilities and solid waste disposal. Demography - there should be a general discussion of this. Cultural Resources 1. Visual Resources items a-c any elevations of the buildings should be included. 2. Historic and Archaeological Resources items a-b. The archaeological resources should include a statement from a recognized source. Significant Environmental Impacts - The following should be discussed: - Construction in a flood zone - Dredging - It was noted that there may be dredging to deepen the dock area. - Documentation for Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Village of Greenport. It was agreed that there could be a parallel review of the DEIS and Health Department review. - Rare and endangered species - areas that may be disturbed should be reviewed and discussed. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impact should be discussed. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects should be discussed. VIII. Alternatives Items C-F This should also include a discussion on the existing and proposed zoning, the present application, no action, continuing the existing use, and R-40 zoning. Construction staging and time is not an important consideration. Xe Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources should be discussed. SZEPA'I-OWSI(I ASSOCIAI-ES INC. EN%IRONN%EN1AL CONSULTAN]S C~i~J~J~-olc- ~o/~ SEQR 617.21 Appendix D State Environmental uality Review Scoping Checklist The following checklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact Statement. TypicaIly, no one project will require a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this document. Through the scoping process, the list of topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the proposed project. Topic areas may be de- leted, added or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final scoping document. The purpose of the checklist format is to iden- tify the basic topic areas of the Draft ElS. This is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a check in the box located to the left of these topics which should be discussed. The model scoping checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including comments, suggestions and identifica- tion of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that has been checked. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, are issues not associated with the project and may be eliminated from discussion in the Draft ElS. The next step is to expand the list to include or elaborate on those topics unique to the pro- posed project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the checklist for such additional information. The scoping process involves several steps in addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also includes discussions on the quantity and quality of informaton required and the methods of obtain- ing that data. NOTE: This check list was designed to be used in conjunction with the section on scoping contained in SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final EIS's. It is also important to emphasize that this checklist should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping of a Draft ElS. It should not be used as a substitute for actively scoping Draft ElS for a specific project. 1. Cover Sheet All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a cover sheet that includes: A. Whether it is a draft or finaJ statement B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location (county and town, village or city) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the state- ment and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft ElS G. In the case of a Draft ElS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated ,---Il. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are re- quired for Draft and Final EIS's. The summary should include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significanj;, beneficial and adverse im- pacts, (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) ~111. Description of the Proposed Action Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the draft ElS. [] A. PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history 2.Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on ad- opted community developments plans 3.Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a.) social b.) economic ~ B. LOCATION ! .Establish geographic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3.Description of existing zoning of proposed site 4. Other: · ,~ C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1 .Total site area a.) proposed impervious surface area (roofs, parking lots, roads) b.) amount of land to be cleared c.) open space 2. Structures a.) gross leaseable area (GLA), if applicable b.) layout of buidings (attached, enclosed, separate) c.) site plans and profile view d.) material storage e.) drainage plans f.) above/underground pipelines g.) staging area for material handling 3. Parking a.) pavement area b.) number of spaces and layout 4. Other: (~D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a.) total construction period anticipated b.) schedule of construction c.) future potential development, on site or on adjoining properties d.) other: 2. Operation a.) type of operation b.) schedule of operation c.) other: '~ r_. CLOSLiREAND ?OST £LC$'-3',rt,£ PL~N~ (for projects of planned limited life such as landfills) [~"~F. APPROVALS 1. Required changes or variances to the zoning regulations 2. Other permit approval or funding reguirements IV, Environmental Setting Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the Draft ElS. ,~a I Resource · GEOLOGY -- ~ ' ~. Subo,..f,..a . -- a.) composition and thickness of subsurface material examples: --depth to, and nature of, bedrock formations and impermeable layers --occurrence of an extractive mineral resource --usefulness as construction material 2.b.) earthquake potential Surface a.) List of soil types b.) discussion of soil characteristics examples: --physical properties (indication of soils hydrological (infiltration capabilities) --engineering properties (soil bearing capacity) --agricultural properties (soil profile characteristics) when agr~- cultural land resources are involved c.) distribution of soil types at project site d.) suitability for use examples: --agriculture --recreation --construction --mining e.) other: [~3. Topography a.) description of topography at project site examples: --slopes --prominent or unique features b.) description of topography of sur- rounding area [~B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: --depth of water table --seasonal variation --quality --quantity --flow b.) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater examples: --location of existing wells --public/private water supply --industrial uses --agricultural uses 2 2.Surface water a.) location and decription of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples: --seasonal variation --quantity --classification according to New York State Department of Health b.) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters examples: --public/private water supply --industrial uses --agricultural uses --recreational c.) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels d. discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutro- phication of water supply ~ ~.. ^~ [] 1.Climate a.) discussion of seasonal variations and extremes examples: --temperature --humidity --precipitation --wind [] 2.Air quality a.) description of existing air quality levels examples: --list the National and State Air Quality Standards for the project area and the compliance status for each standard b.) identification of existing sources or pollutants-fixed or mobile c.) identification of any sensitive recepters in project area examples: --hospitals, schools, nursing homes, parks d.) description of existing monitoring program (if applicable) · TERRESTRAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a.) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b.) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance --age --size --distribution --dominance --community types --unique, rare and endangered species --value as habitat for wildlife --productivity [] 2.Fish, SheI]fish and Wildlife a.) list of fish, shellfish and wildlife species on the project site and within surrounding area, including migatory and resident species b.) discussion of fish, shellfish and wildlife population characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance --distribution --dominance --unique, rare and endangered species --productivity [] 3. Wetlands a.) list wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b.) discuss wetland characteristics examples: --acreage --vegetative cover --classification --benefits of wetland such as flood and erosion control, recreation ~-'~E. AGR;CGLTGEAL RESO~ ! .Soils a.) list soils by name, slope and soil group ranking within NYS Land Classification System (1 NYCRR 370) b.) number of acres within each group c.) location of site on soil survey map [] 2. Agricultural land management system(s) a.) inventory of existing erosion control and drainage systems examples: --subsurface drain lines --outlet/diversion ditches --strip cropping --diversion terraces b.) relationship of proposed action to existing soil and water conservation plans (if applicable) [] 3.Associated operations a.) number and types of farm operations on and adjacent to site examples: --dairy --grain --orchard b.) type and proximity of farm related facilities examples: --storage units/barns --sorting/packing houses --refrigeration units --roadside markets c.) access to cropland (including detached fields) d.) access for farm equipment to public roads Human Resources [] A. TRANSPORTATION [] 1.Transportation services a.) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: --roads, canals, railroads, bridges --parking facilities --traffic control --access/egress from site b.) description of current level of use of services examples: --a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow --vehicle mix --source of existing traffic a.) description of the current avail- ability of service b.) description of present level of use [] 4.0~', ..... [] 13. LAND USE AND ZONING [] ! .Existing land use and zoning a.) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area examples: --commercial --residential --agricultural --business --retail --industrial --vacant b.) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area c.) description of any affected agri- cultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site [] 2. Land use plans a.) description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b.) discussion of future development trends or pressures [] 3. Other; [] C. COMMUNITY SERVICE (for this section include a list of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs) [] 1 .Educational facilities ~' 2.Police protection ~ 3.Fire protection [] 4.Health care facilities [] 5.Social services [] 6.Recreational facilities [] 7. Utilities ~ 8. Public water supply [] 9.Solid waste disposal ~ lO.Sewage treatment facilities [] 11.Other: ~'"'D. DEMOGRAPHY [] 1 .Population characteristics a.) discussion of existing population parameters examples: --distribution --density --household size and composition b.) discussion of projections for popu- lation growth [] 2. Other: ~"~E. CULTURAL RESOURCES ~'/1. Visual resources a.) description of the physical char- acter of the community examples: --urban vs. rural b.) description of natural areas of significant scenic value c.) identification of structures of / significant architectural design ~2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory 4 C b.) identification of sites having potential sig-ificant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey, if conducted a.) identification of existing level of noise in the community b.) identification of major sources of noise examples --airports --major highways --industrial/commercial facilities [] 4. Other: V. Significant Environmental impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section IV that may be adversely or beneficially affected by the proposed action and require discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environ- mental impact. Describe measures to reduce or avoid poten- tial adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource [] A. GEOLOGY I. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.) use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation c.) other: 2. Surface a.) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b.) minimize disturbance of non- construction sites c.) design and implement soil erosion control plan d.) other: 3. Topography a.) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b.) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas of steep slope c.) other: [] 13. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) design/modify system of treatment for stormwater runoff of wastewater prior to recharge of groundwater b.) maintain permeable areas on the site c.) institute a program for monitoring water quality in adjacent wells d.) require secondary or tertiary con- tainment of products/wastes e.) contingency plans for accidental spills f.) other: 2. Surface water a.) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: --hay bales --temporary restoration of vege- tation to disturbed areas --landscaping b.) design adequate stormwater control system c.) construct/modify sewage treatment facilities d.) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal e,) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources f.) require secondary or tertiary containment of products/wastes g.) contingency plans for accidental spills h.) other: [] C. AIR RESOURCES 1. Air quality a.) assure proper construction practices examples: --fugitive dust control --proper operation and mainten- ance of construction equipment b.) design traffic improvements to re- duce congestion and vehicle delay c.) install and ensure the proper operation of emission odor control devices d.) initiate a program for monitoring of air quality e.) other: [] D. TERRESTRALAND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a.) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b.) preserve part of site as a natural c.) after construction, landscape site with naturally occurring vegetation d.) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization 5 2. Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b.) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of fish, shellfish and wildlife cycles c.) other: [] E. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES I. Soils a.) select/design project to avoid viable agricultural land b.) reclaim disturbed agricultural soil profiles for agricultural purposes e.) schedule activity when crops are off fields and soil is firm d.) other: 2. Agricultural land management systems a.) re-establish access drives, fence-- lines and any disturbed land management systems b.) re-establish any disturbed erosion control and drainage systems c.) install soil and water management practices to restore or enhance soil drainage and stability d.) preserve open space for agricultural use e.) develop lease back arrangements to allow continued agricultural use on all or portion of site f.) other: Human Resources [] A. TRANSPORTATION 1 ,Transportation a.) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b.) install adequate traffic control devices c.) optimize use of parking areas d.) encourage car pooling and oper- ation of facility durin§ non-peak traffic times e.) design special routing and restricted hours for delivery truck traffic f.) other: 2. Public transportation a.) adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service the facility b.) encourage use of public transpor- ration by using incentive programs for employees or by selling tickets in facility c.) other: [] B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1. Existing lend use and zoning a.) design project to comply with existing land use plans b.) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surround- ing land use c.) other: [] C. COMMUNITY SERVICES !. Police protection a.) minimize local police protection responsibilities by providing private security force b.) provide security systems, alarms for facility c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 2. Fire protection a.) use construction materials that minimize fire hazards b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 3. Utilities a.) install utility services underground b.) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c.) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design d.) other: [] D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a.) design exterior of structure to physically blend with existing surroundings b.) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and signs (consider: height, size, intensity, glare and hours of lighting operation) c.) design landscaping to be visually pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding land uses, parking areas, operational equip- ment and facilities d.) other: 2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) Prepare a plan, including measures to mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restriction of project activities b.) develop measures to convey cul- tural information to the community (e.g. through scientific/popular reports, displays) c.) preserve architecturally signifi- cant structures and make an adequate permanent photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed d.) other: 3. Noise a.) schedule construction/operation to occur during "normal business" hours minimizing noise impact during sensitive times (early morn- 'lng, night) b.) assure adherence to construction noise standards c.) design berms and landscaping to block and absorb noise d.) other: Vll. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented Identify those adverse environmental effects in Section V that can be expected to occur regard- less of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI. VIII. Alternatives This section contains categories of alterna- tives with exam?les. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level sufficient to permit a compara- tive assessment of costs, benefits and environmen- tel risks for each alternative, it is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alter- native is or is not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the by l;]acing a check in the box located to the left of the topic. [] A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES 'l. Site layout e.) density and location of structures b.) location of access routes, parking and utility routes 2.Orientation a.) compatibility with slope and dra!nage p,,tterns b.) site size and set back requirements 2 .Technology a.) poJlution control equipment b.) innovative vs. proven technologies 4. Mix of activities a) addition of businesses which would affect the operational nature of the facility [] ~ 1. Limiting factors a.) availability of land b.) suitability of alternative site to accomodate design requirements c.) availability of utilities d.) suitable market area e.) compatibility with local zoning and master plan f,) compatibility with certified agri- cultural districts g.) compatibility with regional objectives h.) accessibility of site to transporta- tion routes and service population [] C. ALTERNATIVE SIZE I. Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and community needs [] D. ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/ OPERATION SCHEDULING 1. Commence construction at a different time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule [] E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE 1.Suitability of site for other uses a.) other types of commercial uses b.) other types of industry c.) different types of housing d.) agricultural use e.) other: [] F. NO ACTION I .Impacts of no action a,) effect on public need b.) effect on private developers' need c.) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts [] G. OTHER: IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, convert- ed or made unavailable for future use. ~ ~ett'th !:-':~:.L;~ A.p~t~ (~f applicable) Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have. Listed on the next page are examples of topics that are typi- cally affected by the growth induced by a project. [] A. POPULATION I .Increases in business and resident population due to the creation or relocation of business 2. Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing [] B. SUPPORT FACILITIES !. business created to serve the increased population 2.Service industries created to supply new facility [] C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL I. Introduction or improvement of infra- structure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infra- structure [] D. OTHER: Energy Resources (if applicable) Identify the energy sources to be used, anticipated ]evels of consumption and ways to reduce energy consumption. The examples listed below are typical issues to be considered when ad- dressing this topic. [] A.PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND ALTERNATIVES [] B.ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG- TERM LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION [] C.INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 1. Increased dependence on automobile use 2.Increased levels of traffic due to proposed project [] D.ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 1. Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating, cooling and lighting a.) conventional technology examples: --insulation --thermopane windows --use of Iow wattage lights b.) innovative technology examples: --heat pumps --solar panels --wind energy --use of waste heat from an industrial plant --use of recycled materials c.) efficient layout examples: --orientation of structures in relation to summer and winter sunlight --clustering of structures to maximize common walls --shortening of utility runs --shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits a.) location and design of facility to accomodate mass transit b.) use of shuttle buses c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance [] E.OTHER: XII. Assessment of Unavailable Information In certain situations involving major develop- ments (such as an oil supertanker port, a liquid propane/natural gas storage facility, a resource recovery facility or a hazarduous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility), information regarding reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment may not be available. Such informa- tion may be unavai[able because the means to ob- tain it are unknown or the cost of obtaining it is exhorbitant, or because there is uncertainty about its va]idity. If such information is essential to an agency's SEQR finding, the ElS must: A. Identify the nature and relevance of such unavailable or uncertain information; and 13. Provide a summary of existing credible scientific evidence , if available; and C. Assess the likelihood of occurrence and consequences of the potential impact, even if the probability is Iow, using the- oretical approaches or research methods generally accepted in the scientific community. This assessment should be applied only where reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment are possible and it is not intended to be applied in the review of such actions as shop- ping malls, residential subdivisions and commer- cial facilities even though the size and scale of some such projects may be extensive. XIII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the ElS. A. List of underlying tudies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement 13. List all federal, state, regional, or local agencies, organizations, consultants and private 8 persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevent correspondence regarding the projects may be included (required in the Final EIS) Additional Draft EIS Scoplng Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft ElS. Attach additional sheets if SOUTHOLD ................................................... , N. Y.,......~..¥ .................. 1~k,8..8.. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, N. ¥., Dr. A~,~e 23 Narragansett Avenue, Jamestown, RI 02835 Fed. I. D. No ..................................... or Soc. Security No ......................... Scoping Session as ~er the resolution of the Town Board for the following Change of Zone: Harborview Landin~ (Sa~e ProDertv~ Principal Planner ................. 2.0 hours ~ $ 70-00 S 140 ~0 Environs. ental Plan~e~ .. ........... 8.0 hours @ $ 50 00 $ .400.00 The undersigned (Claimant) (Acting on behalf of above named Claimant) does hereby certify that the foregoing claim is true and correct and that no part thereof has been paid. except as therein stated, and that the balanCejune ltherein stated is actually due88 and owing. ~..~.~ .--~ ~ C/~/~ ,. I, ~TA~ ~ Dated . ,19 I ~ ....................................................... ............ %...~ignature HARI ©I ¥Il W 800 Veterans Memorial Hwy. Hauppauge, NY 11788 (516) 7246333 Shore Road Glenwood Landing, NY 11576 (516) 944-7458 May 25, 1988 Southold Town Board 53095 Main Road Southold, N.Y. 1~97~ Dear Sirs: Based upon our conversations with Dave Emilita, Town Environmental Consu[tant, we understand there is an environmental impact review fee required. This is to be paid by the applicant prior to their commencing with a scoping session. Please find enclosed, our check for $2,000 to allow Dave Emilita to begin his work. Sincerely, HARBORVI~W REALTy COMPS,NY Edward S. Silsbe cc: JAC Consultants Jeffrey Forche111, Esq. EECEIVB:) MAY 1 8 1988 INFORMJ 11011 May 17, 1988 TO: Town Board, Planning Board and Trustees Town of Southold RE: Petition of Harborview Realty Company Suffolk County Tax Map - District 1000, Section 53 Block 5 P/O lot 123 (known as Sage property) Request by Harborview Realty Company to change the zone of the above referenced property to: M-1 General Multiple Residence District I am a property owner on Island View Lane, adjacent to the Sage property, where a zoning change has been requested. I oppose a rezoning to an M-1 General Multiple Residence District because it will have adverse affects on the neighborhood character and the environment. The nature of the M-1 zone is more appropriate to areas that are expected to have greater densities, such as hamlets or villages, where the infrastructure can support higher densities. Replacing the existing designation of "A" Residential to Multiple Dwelling would challenge the integrity of the zoning, flaunt sound planning principles and threaten the environment. Beyond the negative impact of an increased density would be the equally objectionable building heights and bulk that are inconsistent with the surrounding area and would stand as a wall to the bay. The current zoning allows for an economic development of the property. It is essential and prudent that this proposal be denied and that the existing zoning remain. Sincerly yours, Island View Lane Greenport, N.Y. JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 22, 1988 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 Jeffery D. Forchelli, Esq. 120 Mineola Boulevard P. O. Box 31 Mineola, New York 11501 Dear Mr. Forchelli: Enclosed is a Positive Declaration, Notice of Significant Effect on the Environment, in connection with the Harborview Realty Co. petition for a change of zone, which determination was the subject of a Town Board resolution on April 19, 1988, copies of both enclosed. Harborview Realty Co. is requested to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for submission to me upon completion. Thank you. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box l 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 19, 1988: WHEREAS, Harborview Realty Co. has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-I" General Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, New York; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold town Code, the Southold Town Board, at lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Harborview Realty Co. of this determination and further request said applicant to prepare a draft environmental impact statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. Southold Town Clerkc/ April 22, 1988 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance · SEQR Project NumDer 'Petition No, 286 Date April 19, 1988 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The $o~J-hnlc~ mnwn ~n~c~ . as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may I~ave a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Harborview Realty Change of Zone SEQR Status: Type I Unlisted Description of Action: Proposal is for a change of zone on 24.959 acres from A-R Aaricultural- Residential District to M-1 General Multiple Residence District, to provide for the development of 40 homes in 10 buildings. Location: (include street adc~ress and the name of ti~e municipality/county A ideation map of apDroDr~ate scale is also recommenc~ed.) Proposal is located at Main Road and Sage Boulevard, Greenport; Suffolk County Tax Map'No. 1000-53-5-12.3 and 12.4; See also location map. Part 2--PHUd~-(,;I' IMHAL;I~ Al~lu In General Information CRead Carefully) · In completing the ~orm the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been ~easonable~ The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · (dentifying that ~n impact will be potentially large [column 2) does not mean that it is ~]so necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PAR~ 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 s~mply asks that it be looked ~t further. · The Example~ provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude :ha: would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generaUy applicable throughout the 5ta~e and for most s~tuadons. 8ut, for any soecific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impac~ of each project, on each site, in e~ch ~ocality, will va~. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offere~ as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impac~ and thresholds :o answer each question. · The number of examples per question does no: ~ndicate the impo~ance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, sho~ :erin and cumla:ive effect. Inst~uctlons (Re~d carefuHy~ a. Answer e~ch of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impacL b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a ~uestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of ~he impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of ~he impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by changes) in the proiect to a small :o mode~3te impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. Th~s must be explained in Part 3. I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] C'lYes ~-]No [] [] ~-IYes [] [] I-lYes I-'1 NO [] [] [-]Yes i-'INa [] [] []Yes []No I'-I [] I-lYes F"1No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [] [] L"-]Yes I'-~No [] [] []Yes []No ' IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site~' nNO IrIyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than I feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction thai: will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect ~, ...y u.~,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.ll-iNO I~YES * Specific land forms: Wetlands · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ~NO Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed $ lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? [:]NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site. over or near site or found on the site. · Remove,' of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for :agricultural purposes. · Other impacts' Endanqered ~Decies m~y pQssiblv live on the site, a study would be needed. 9 Will Proposed Action substantia[Iy affect non-threatened or non-endangered species;' I-INO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~grator~ fish. shellfish or wddlife speoes · Proposed Acuon requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (o~er 100 years o~ age) or other locally important vegetation IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 w,II the Propos~,d Act,on affect agricultural land resources~ ~]NO [mYES Examples that v, ould apply to column 2 land (includes cropland ha,,f,eld~, pasture wne;ard orchard, etc ) ii, ~f I 2 3' Small to Potentiel Can Impact I~e Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] •Yes •NO [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] OYes ["'iNo [] [] []Yes I-1No [] [] []yes •No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] ayes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes r-~No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [~Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] Elves ~--INO IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? ~NO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? [][NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy .transmission or supply system to serve more than S0 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or.vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? J~NO 0-1YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ~iNO ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil. pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed ~ction may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, h~ghly reactive, radioactive, irritating. infectious, etc.) · Storage faci[iues for one mdhon or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids · Proposed action may result m the excavation or other disturbance w~thm 2.000 feet of a s~te used for the disposal oi solid or hazardous · C)thnr ~mpacts: 10 I 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] l-lYes ['-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [-~No 'D [] [] Yes []No [D [] i'iYes []No [] [] []Yes []No 'i--I [] []Yes []~o [] [] []Yes []~,o [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [],~o [] [] [DYes []~o [] [] []Yes []~o [] [] []Yes []~o [] [] []Yes [] ~ ~Y~s ~0 ~ ~ ~Yes ~o PART III HARBORVIEW LANDING SAGE PROPERTY Access road will be constructed within 75 feet of freshwater wetlands quite possibly within wetlands. Proposed buildings will be within a flood zone 40 boat slips are proposed in conjunction with proposal which will have an impact on water quality, drainage and parking. Proposal would need approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for sewage disposal systems as well as for the water hookup, without documentation, it is difficult to assess if the soil would support subsurface septic tanks and cesspools since the area conatins clay. Approval would also be needed from the Village of Greenport for the water hook-up. As assessment would also be needed to determine the presence of rare, threatened and endangered species on the site and whether there would be any adverse impact. There would be a major reduction in aesthetic resources which are important to the community, although, there will be a preservation of open space, it may not mitigate the impact of the construction, especially the view from the water. There should be some public access provided and the impact of none should be discussed particularly with regard to the LWRP. The roadway access to the site is questionable since it is right-of-way which does not provide adequate width for new development. The 40 dwelling units proposed is twice the number that the Planning Board would ordinarily allow using a single access of adequate width. There should be a dedication of open space and proof that this will be left in fact "forever wild" IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? ~NO ~YES E~amples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the proiect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or Operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community, · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: · '" I 2 '3 ,~1 Small to Potential Can Impact Be / Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact !Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes i--~No ~ [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes r-INo [] [] []Yes '[]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes r"l No [] [] DYes i--INo [] [] []Yes I--~NO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be. public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ~NO [~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s) 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the ~mpact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known oblecnons to the proiect relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 11 · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or. if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.$ acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources;~ []NO [~'YE5 (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enloyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screenin& of scemc views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. WHi Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance~ f~'NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partiMIy within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project s~te. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeolog,cal sites on the NYS S~te Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed Achon aftect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that ~,ould apph,' to ~.olumn 2 .-~NO r'ZYES · The permanent foreclo,ure ota future recreatfonal opportumty · A malor reduc[zon of an open space ~mportant to the commumty · Other ,reDaCts Preserve qndevelopable open space. 9 I 2 3 '~ Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] I-') i-)Yes []No [] [] F-lyes m"') No [] [] []Yes I--m) NO [] [] ['--)Yes I'--I NO [] [] L'"] Yes I'-)No [] [] E)Yes []No [] [] []Yes []mNO ~ [] i--lYes []NO [] [] ,_.r~'Fes []No [] [] C]¥es CNo [] [] r-lyes F~o [] [] []Yes ~o [] [] m--lyes []No [] [] [~JYes ~;No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL [DNO r~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: Rc~a~ ~-nn~er~-~n~ ~Hthin 75 feet of freshwater wetland 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new hod of water? ~NO Examples that would apply to column · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5 Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? f~NO Ik'IYE Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed ~.ction will adverse~· affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conve,,,,-d off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. (sept&ge) · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. · Proposed -action will likely c.-'.us,- siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water tc u ,~ exte,u that there will be an obvious visual contrast Jo naturai conditions. Slip construction · Proposed Action will requ,re the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Propnsed Action locates commerctal and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and'or storage fac,lit:es. · Other impacts___. 6 Will proposed action alter drainage t:~v. or patterns, or ~urface E~,~ ~ples ~nat would apply to column 2 7 1 2 .3 Small to Potential Can Impac,~.~'~ Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Chang~ F'~ [] [~Yes E~No [] [-I r-~Yes []No [] [] []Yes F"I No [] ~ ~Yes DNo D ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yef ~o ~ ~¥e~ C~c ~ ! - SEQR Positive Declaration Reasons Supporting This Determination: Page A) B) See Part II and Part III attached, and The proposed zone change is requested on 24.959 acres of land and would constitute a Type I action if it were ~roposed for.25 acres of land. This,is interpreted as contrivance to avoid an automatic Type I classification. For Further information: Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Address:iTown Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, Telephone Numbe~. 516-765-1801 NY 11971 A Copy of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation (Stony Brook, NY) Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located. Applicant (if any) Other involved agencies (if any) Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Jeffrey D. Forchelli, Esq., for Harborview Realty Co. Suffolk County Department of Planning Suffolk County Department of Health Services JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK R£GISTR~.R O~' ~ITAL STATISTICS Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON APRIL 19, 1988: WHEREAS, Harborview Realty Co. has heretofore applied to the Southold Town Board for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-I" General Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, New York; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conserva- tion Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Codes, Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold town Code, the Southold Town Board, at lead agency, does hereby determine that the action proposed is likely to have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the Town Clerk shall file and circulate such determination as required by the aforementioned law, rules and code. 3. That the Town Clerk immediately notify the applicant, Harborview Realty Co. of this determination and further request said applicant to prepare a draft environmental impact statement, all in accordance with said law, rules and code. ~Terry Southold Town C?eek April 22, 1988 617.21 Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft ElS Determination of Significance SEQR Project Number .' Date This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The $ou~-hnl,-'] mnwn R~-c] , as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Harborview Realty Change of Zone SEQR Status: Type I [] Unlisted [] Description of Action: Proposal is for a change of zone on 24.959 acres from A-R Aaricultural- Residential District to M-1 General Multiple Residence District, to provide for the development of 40 homes in 10 buildings. Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of apDroDriate scale is also recommended.) Proposal is located at Main Road and Sage Boulevard, Greenport; Suffolk County Tax Map No. 1000-53-5-12.3 and 12.4; See also location map. SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: A) B) See Part II and Part III attached, and The proposed zone change is requested on 24.959 acres of land and would constitute a Type I action if it were Droposed for 25 acres of land. This,is interpreted as contrivance to avoid an automatic Type I classification. For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith T. Terry, Town Clerk Ad~ress:-Town Hall, 53095 Main Road, Southold, Telephone Number:. 516-765-1801 NY 11971 A Copy of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Roacl, Albany, New York 12233-0001 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located. Applicant (if any) Other involved agencies (if any) Part2-- ,uJbci IMPA~,I,~A,,U II'ICI,, Caroleully] Responsibility o~ lead Agency " General Information (Read · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable! The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · Identifying that an impact will be potentially large [column 2) does not mean that it is also necessariIy significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 2, to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds ma,/be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site. in each locality, will vai'y. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cum)ative effects. Instructiona (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yea if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column I or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact wili occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentiaIIy large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the proiect to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3, ^ No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? r~NO R~yEs Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect t~....,y un,que or unusual land forms found on the site? Ci.e.. cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)l~NO ~YE$ · Specific land forms: Wetlands 6 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact 8e Moderate Large Mitigated 8y Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [-]Yes I--~NO [] i--I I~Yes I-INa [] r-~ OYes F"~No [] [] []Yes E]No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No IMPACT ON WATER Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? {Under Articles 15.24.25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) ~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: R~a~ ,"'m'n~+-rr~r','l'-'im'~ ,,H~-llilq 75 feet of freshwater wetland 4 Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? []NO []YES Examples that would appJy to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water pr more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: $ Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? F~NO ~IYE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Actiou will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed {project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed ~.ction will adverse~ effect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conve',,,-d off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequa:e capacity. (septacj'e) · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20.000 gallons per day. · Proposed .~ction will likely c.-'.us,, siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water t¢ [~ e exte.~ that there will be an obvious visual contrast ~o naturai conditions. Slip construction · Proposed Action will requ,re the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1.100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Propnsed Action locate: commeroal and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion o~ ex~sting waste treatment and'or storage facd~tles. · Other impacts'___. , 6 Will proposed action alter drama§e l]~w or patterns, or ~urface wat~,r runo~H ~-NO ~YES E~, ~ples that would affp'.v to column 2 · Pre i.,r ~cd Action would change [',r~od w~:er flows 7 ~1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [~ [~]Yes []~O [] [] []Yes [] [] •Yes F-)No [] [] ("~)Yes DNa ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~No ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~ ~ ~Yes ~o ~ ~ ~Yes · Proposed Action may'cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? []NO r-lYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given · hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? f'lNO I~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Remove' of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year. other than for ~gricultural purposes. · Other impacts: EndanGered species may ~Qssibl¥ live on the site, a study would be needed. 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? F'INO L~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or m~gr3tory fish, shellhsh or wddhie spec,es. · Proposed Acbon requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature f4)res~ [over 100 years of age) or other locally ,mportant vegetabon IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 ~',[[ the Propos~,d Action affect agrlculturaJ land resources~ ~NO (~YES E~ampies that ~.ould apply to column 2 · The propo>ed action ~ould ~ever cross or hmlt access to agricultural landl,nciudes cropland, ha,,.i,elds pasture v,ne;ard orchard, etc) W 2 3' Small to Potential Can Impac~ Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes F'-~No [] f-~ []Yes []No [] [] DYes L--INo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] [-]Yes D ~ D~es ~No O D 5no ~ ~ DYes O ~ ~es C ~ 5~'es · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres of asricultural [and. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural laPd management systems (e.g., subsurface drain Iines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources[' F1NO [~YES (if necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses. or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that wilt result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12 Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? [~NO F~YES Examples that would apply to column :2 · Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project s~te. · Proposed Action wdl occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological s~tes on the NYS S~e Inventory. · Other impacts IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Wdl Proposed Acbon a~tect the quantity or qua[it,,' of existing or ~uture open spaces or recreational opportunlt~es~ Examples that ~ould apph,' to column 2 reNO f~ZYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreat~'ona[ opportunity · .~. major reduction o~ an open sDace ~rnportant tO the cornmumty. · Other ~rnpacts Preserve undevelopable open space. g I 2 3 Small to Potential Can impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] I~Yes I--INo [] [] I-lYes I-]No [] [] I-lYes C]No [] [] f-lYes I-]No [] n myes E]No [] [] I'"'1Yes []No [] [-'] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] [:]Yes [] [] i--]Yes [--~No [] [] ~','es []No [] [] []Yes []~o ~ [] []Yes r-No [] [] r-lyes r'~No [] [] []Yes []~o [] [] []Yes IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? [~NO [~YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply~ [~NO nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy .transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a maior commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be obiectionable odors, noise, or.vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ~]NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,$00 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely [more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? F~NO []YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesbcides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. · Proposed ~,ction may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (ia. toxic, poisonous, h~ghly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc ) · Storage facllit~es for one mllhon or more gallons of l/quilled natural gas or other flammable liquids · Proposed actton may result m the excavation or other disturbance w~thm 2.000 feet of a s~te used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. 10 m "~1 2 3' Small to Potential ' Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] I-1 l-lYes [-1No ~ [] r-lyes I--]No [] [] []Yes I'~No '~ [] EgYes []No [] [] [Z]Yes E]No [] [] ~Yes []No [] [] F-lYes []No [] [] ('-)Yes m'-) ho [] [] []Yes I-]No [] [] F-)Yes Fl,No [] F-1 i-)Yes I'~No [] [] I-lYes r-~o [] [] r-lyes []~.o I-) [] r-lyes C3 [] ~Yes []~o [] [] r~yes IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? I-}NO ~YE$ Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capita[ expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: e i ":r 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] [-]Yes I--INo [] [] []Yes r-INa l~i [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lyes ()No [] [] I~Yes []No r-I [] []Yes []~o [] [] •Yes [] no [] [] ['-[Yes []No [] [] []Yes I~No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? DNO i~YES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3--EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions D~scuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change!si 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibihty, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the proiect relate to this impact CContinue on attachments) 11 PART III HARBORVIEW LANDING SAGE PROPERTY Access road will be constructed within 75 feet of freshwater wetlands quite possibly within wetlands. Proposed buildings will be within a flood zone 40 boat slips are proposed in conjunction with proposal which will have an impact on water quality, drainage and parking. Proposal would need approval from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for sewage disposal systems as well as for the water hookup. Without documentation, it is difficult to assess if the soil would support subsurface septic tanks and cesspools since the area conatins clay. Approval would also be needed from the Village of Greenport for the water hook-up. As assessment would also be needed to determine the presence of rare, threatened and endangered species on the site and whether there would be any adverse impact. There would be a major reduction in aesthetic resources which are important to the community, although, there will be a preservation of open space, it may not mitigate the impact of the construction, especially the view from the water. There should be some public access provided and the impact of none should be discussed particularly with regard to the LWRP. The roadway access to the site is questionable since it is right-of-way which does not provide adequate width for new development. The 40 dwelling units proposed is twice the number that the Planning Board would ordinarily allow using a single access of adequate width. There should be a dedication of open space and proof that this will be left in fact "forever wild" March 1988 To: Town Board, Planning Board and Trustees Town of Southold RECEIVED Re: Petition of Harborview Realty Company MAR 2 ' 1988 Suffolk County Tax Map°- District 1000, Section 53 Block 5 P/O lot 123 (known as Sage property) Request by Harborview Realty Compagy to change the zone of the above referenced property to: M-1 General Multiple Residence District Our names are Edwin M. and Constance T. Latson. We live year- round in the home we own on Island View Lane Extension, District 1000, Section 57, Block 2, Lot 12, next to Mr. and Mrs. William J. Schneider, who border on the easterly l%ne of the Sage property. '.We are opposed to the request for a zone change, and encourage retention of the existing zoning. Our opposition to the requested zone change includes concern for our water supply, quantity and quality., and concern for the increased pollution of our bays from increased density of population at the water's edge. But these are engineering problems which professionals must consider. What we can personally object to is the aesthetics of a wall of condominiums thirty feet high down the western side of Conklin Point. One has only to look at Cleave Point, Stirling Harbor, or nearby Oyster Point to see how these massive structures completely ruin the beauty of each community. The proposed buildings on Conklin Point are just such monstrosities, and the closer they are to the point, the worse they will look. If they have to be built, they should be nearer the commercial area at the northwest end, not at our beautiful residential end of the point where every house is different and few have a second story. We want to preserve the rural character of Conklin Point. Con- dominiums with garages bring a density of population and a suburbia which we live in Southold to escape. We request that the zone change be denied. Respectfully ~submitted, Edwin M. Latson Constance T. Latson D'AMATO, FORCHELLI, LIBERT; SCHWARTZ, MINEO g JOSEPH F. CARLINO COUNSELORS AT LAW [20 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O BOX 3l MINEOLA, NEW YORK II~0t (516) 248-1700 RECEIVED MAR ! 4 088 March 10,.1988 Office of the Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Petition of Harbor View Realty Co. for a Change of Zone; Environmental Review Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to correspondence dated February 29, 1988, from the Office of the Town Clerk to the undersigned, enclosed herewith is the check of Harbor View Realty Co. made payable to the Southold Town Clerk in the sum of $210.00. As stated in the aforementioned letter, this fee will cover the cost of the project's preliminary environmental review which will be conducted by David Emilita, a Planner engaged by the ~sw~n for this service. / Very tru~ly your/ /; TOWN OF SOUTIIOLD . _ - ,', Suffolk County. Ne.' York 516. ?6saa0x RI:C..t:I ¥ F D MAR ~. ~ 1088 PL A'~NN I .NG~B0~RO TOW:N, OE-SOUTHOLD $ UFFO. LK-~O~T¥ -~'% % -; '- '~ 50/ Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 8, 1988 Mr. Arlen Bolstad 120 Mineola Ave. Mineola, NY 11501 RE: Harborview Realty Co. SCTM # 1000-53-5-12.3 Dear Mr. Bolstad: The following action was taken by the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, March 7, 1988. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board set March 21, 1988 as the presentation date for this change of zone petition. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact our office. jt Very truly yours, BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR.['d~AIRMAN~'-~ SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD Town Board, Town of Southold Petition of Harborview Realty Company Suffolk County, Tax Map - District 1000, Section 53, Block 5 P/O lot 123 (known as "Sage" property) 0 Request by Harborview Realty Company to change the zone of the above refer- enced property to: M-1 General Multiple Residence District (where the existing cottages are located) To the members of the Southold Town Board: My name is William J. Schneider. I and my wife Joan Schneider are the owners of a parcel of land described in the Suffolk County tax map, District 1000, Section 57, Block 2, Lot 11 which borders on the easterly line of the "Sage" property for a distance of 229 feet. We are opposed to the request for a zone change by Harborview Realty Company for the "Sage" property. We support and encourage retention of the existing zoning for the "Sage" property i.e. "A" Residential - Agricultural Zone. Typically, Zoning Codes are developed and applied to parcels of land within a municipality in order to provide enllgbtened, consistent, intelligent developmeT~t of properties, with a specific purpose in mind, so that common good is realized. This of course is Bill Schneider's definition but I feel it fairly well describes the process and the logic behind it. Key is the phrase, "common good". That, simply put, means the great majority of the peoples' needs and desires are considered. Further, good zoning also provides for an improved quality of llfe for all the people and good zoning demonstrates a concern for the quality of llfe of future generations. Appropriate zoning must also consider broad economic concerns. Today's investment against tomorrow's return; return in terms of public welfare not profit and loss relationships of entrepreneurs. To the point; that is opposition to the requested zone change. Development of the property in question in accordance with the existing zoning would probably be an ecological hardship let alone increasing the present density by a zone change. Good, fresh water is a scarce resource; not in abundant supply on the North Fork. Development of the "Sage" property, with increased density, would further deplete this finite resource. The quality and availability of fresh water is an all too familiar subject to the North Fork constituency and further attention from me would serve no useful purpose. The bays are strangled by the "Brown Tide". This algae did not exist in the waterways until recent years and common sense says that it, the "Tide", must be connected or related to polluted run off and the increased treated sewage finding its way into the bays. Some studies are being done, some are getting off the ground, studies are talked about, etc., etc. Yet, everyone knows, with varying degrees of certainty, that overdevelopment and the resultant contamination is the source of pollution in the bays. Increased density results in increased sewage therefore increased pollution. The requested zone change appears, at least to my inexperienced eyes, to be an example of Spot Zoning. It is certainly driven by profit relationships. While investment and profit is what drives our capitalistic society, and I concur and support this approach, the question is how much profit is reasonable? Earlier, I spoke of today's investment weighed against tomorrow's return. Return in terms of the public welfare and quality of life on the North Shore. That is the profit the Town Board must consider when weighing the merits of this request. The entrepreneur, Harborview Realty, is concerned for maximizing financial profit; that is obvious. Some level of profit could be realized by developing the property under the existing zoning. They, Harborview, would not have purchased the property were this not so. By seeking a zone change, they are attempting to maximize financial return for the principals with no regard to the penalties which will be incurred by future generations of North Shore people. Finally, this whole process of increased development permitted by zone changes and variances would seem to be contrary to the Land Preservation Program and all the logic that supports preservation program(s). Those who bear the heavy responsibility of public office cannot in good conscience support land preservation on one hand and zone changes permitting increased density on the other. The request for a zone change should be denied. /! /' Re sp~ t fu 1 l~'~bm~t t ed ,, 711._~. Schneider JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 February 29, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: Transmitted herewith is the petition of Harborview Realty Co. request- ing a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-l" General Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, Town of Southold, New York. Please prepare an official report defining the conditions described in said petition and determine the area so affected by your recommendations, and transmit the same to me. Thank you. Very truly yours, $outhold Town Clerk Attachments JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1988: WHEREAS, a petition has been received from Harborview Realty Co. for a change of zone on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-l" General Multiple Residence District; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED that the Town Clerk be and she hereby is directed to transmit this petition to the Southold Town Planning Board and the Suffolk County Department of Planning, all in accordance with the Southold Town Code and the Suffolk County Charter. Judith T. Terry Southold Town Cler~ February 26, 1988 ~UDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 February 29, 1988 Jeffrey D. Forchelli, Esq. 120 Mineola Boulevard P. O. Box 31 Mineola, New York 11501 Dear Mr. Forchelli: In accordance with Chapter 44, Environmental Quality Review, of the Code of the Town of $outhold, the Town Board has engaged the services of Planner David Emilita to review the Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by you with respect to the petition of Harborview Realty Co. for a change of zone. The cost of this review is $210.00 and must be paid prior to Mr. Emilita .commencing his work. Please send a check in the amount of $210.00, payable to the Southold Town Clerk, at your earliest convenience so we may proceed with processing your petition. Very truly yours, Southold Town Clerk JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 February 28, 1988 David J.S. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner S zepatowski Associates Inc. 23 Narragansett Avenue Jamestown, Rhode Island 02835 Dear Dave: The Southold Town Board, at their regular meeting held on February 23, 1988, adopted a resolution requesting you to conduct a SEQR review of the Long Environmental Assessment Form with respect to the petition of Harborview Realty Co. for a change of zone, at the agreed cost of $210.00. Petition and pertinent maps, etc. are enclosed herewith. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry $outhold Town Clerk Enclosures JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box l 179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 February 26, 1988 Robert A. Greene, Permit Administrator N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY, Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Dear Mr. Greene: Enclosed is the petition of Harborview Realty Co. for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-I" General Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, Town of Southold, New York. This project is unlisted and we wish to coordinate this action in our role as lead agency. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received by this office until March 14, 1988. We shall interpret your lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency. Very truly yours, Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures cc: Commissioner Jorling Southold Town Building Dept. JUDITH T. TERRY OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-1801 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1988: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby declares itself' lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the petition of Harborview Realty Co. for a change of zone from "A" Residential and Agricultural District to "M-I" General Multiple Residence District on certain property located at Sage Boulevard, Greenport, New York. Southold Town Clerk February 26, 1988 ALDEN W. YOUNG YOUNG ~ YOUNG 400 08TR~NDER 'AVENUE RIVERHE~D, NEW YORK H~ox HOW~.D W. YOUNG February 22, 1988 Town of Southold $outhold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, New York, 11971 Attn: Mrs. Neville FEB 1988 HARBORVIEW REALTY CO. (88-0062) Main Road Oreenport, To~n of Southold, N.Y. Dear Mrs. Neville, At the direction of Mr. Edward Silsbe, of Frendolph Corporation, enclosed herewith please find six (6) additional prints of the above captioned for your use. Very truly yours, Howar~ You~ ' Encs. 14-t'8-2 f2/8 7)':-- 7c SEQR 617.21 ~' Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the er],. ,ronr'nent o~ may be techmcal]`,, exoert ~n enwronmentar analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge m one parth tlI,H area max not be aware o: the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method ~,,herebv apphcants and agenoes can be assured that the determmado~ process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flex~ble to alloy, introduction of informatmn to f~t a project or acuon Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part2: Focuses on identifying the range of poss,ble.npacts that may occur from a prelect or acbon. It provide) guidance as to whether an impact is hkely to be considered small to moderate or whether ~t is a potentlaH¥- large impact. The form also identifies whether an m~pact ran be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If an.,, impact in Part 2 is id~nt,tied as potentially-large then Part J is used to eva~uate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this projecl: ~ Part I [] Part 2 L~Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 ~f appropriate}, and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude ,md mH,~rl,ml'~' *,1 (',t~ h Hiipact, il is reasonably determined b~, the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large and m~pnrtant ~mpact(s) and, therefore. ~ one which will not have a s~gnificant ~mpact on the environm,.nt, theretore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a s~gmf~cant effect on the enwronment, there will not be a s~gnificant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mmgat~on measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* [] C. The project may result in one or more large and m~portan/ m~pacts that may have a ~nif~cant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is onl~ valid for Unhsted ^croons Harborview Landing Southold Town Planning Board Print or Type Name of Responsible Otbcer m Iead Agem v idle or Responsible Ofhcer Signature of Responsible Officer ,n [ cad ..\gene,,. :~g~ature of Preparer fir different from responsible officer) Date 5. '~Proxin~.te percentage of proposedl site ~%lth sh,pe. , !tl-llP'. % 1U-lb% _ ',, 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a hulkhnm site. or dl,trlct, hsted on the State om the Nat.mM Registers of Historic Places~ []Yes b~No ~. What is the depth of the water table?8' Avg. 0n re, ti Range 5 to 13-£eet (Source: 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole 5ourcu aclu,tpr/ I~'l'~b ;~INO 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportuniues pre~entl',' c.~st m the prolect area~ Ex-Yes ,JNo [~Yes ~No According to 1973 Endangered Species Act (Fed) ~mt~:$~m~ NYS Environmental Conservation Law~ Section 11-0535 (State) ..... 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the prolect qte~ (~e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formanon~; ~Yes L-JNo Describe lo566-acte island to be dedicated ~orever wild. 1985 Test Holes) 13. Is the project site presently used by the commumts ur ne~g[lborhood as an open space or recrcatio~ .Hua~ F'lYes ~JNo If yes, e×plam 14. Does the present site include scemc view~ known to bp unporl~mt tr, the communri\/ [~No ]5. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Wetland Pond Tributary to SouthoLd Bay a. Name of Stream and name of RI~er to ~xh~c[/ d ~ tnbutd~,, 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or conuguous to prop.ct dre:~ a. Name Hashamomuck Pond 17 I'; the site served b~ exishng pubhc utilme,.~ K-'~e. ~ ,No a) if Yes, does sufficient capacm,, exist to a[Io~,, connec h S~ze Lin ac~es'~ L~Yes '~ 172 ac. approx. within 1/2 mile Section 303 and 304? L~es ~No of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617~ [~Yes [~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dirnen<.,n, ,,, ,H,pr(l[)rhtl,.I a. Total contiguous acreage o~.ned or controHucI [,s Dr~,lU, [ M;o~'or 83.117 act,:, b. Project acreage to be developed 24. 959 a( ri', ,nrtlall,,' 24. 959 aLit!~ uihmatt.b, C. Project acreage to remam undeveloped 58.157 ,,,r~,s (70%) d. Length of project, in miles. 0.85 (It appropmatel tr If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of -xp, s,on proposed N/A f. Number of off-street parkmg spaces existing 60 , proposed 90 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 22 (upon complet,on ot pro/ect? P.M. Weekday h. If residential: Number and type of housmg umts Townhouse/ Initially 40 Ultimately 40 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure _~_3'~ _ height. 52' width, 12~ length j Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughGuu promct xxdl oo. up¥ ~s? as-is Access to Route 25 (Hain Road) as 3 existing Sage Road 25'. 'Approvafs Required: ~K?. Town, ~1~,~,~ Board Xi~e~ LJNo Ci~, Town, ~'?l~:~-~-e Planmng t~oard ~We.. I'~N~, ~, Town Zoning ~oard of Appeals [X]~e~ ~, County HeaJth Department ~e~ Other Local Agencies ~es L~No Other Regional Agencies ~', e~ ~N,~ ~tate Agencies DEC Federal Agencies []~es ~Nc Town Trustees ~ Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information ~oning_~a__nge__ Subdivisign/.~.!t~_.~a~.Approval ~arlancc ................. Sewage and water Creenport Water District WetLands Permit Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning If Yes, indicate decision required. Wetlands L~o Submittal Dale Pending _ ~new/revision of master plan ~]resource mdi~d~Pmt!r~t pl~n []other 2. What is the zoning classification{s)of the s~te? Residential A 3 What is the maximum potential development of the s~{e if developed as permitted PS, the presen[ zoning~ 31 units existing 4 What ~s the proposed zoning of the site? M-1 General Multiple - Residence District 5 What is the maximum potenba] development of the s,te ,f developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 40 units 6 Is the proposed action consistent w~th the recommended u~es m adopted local land Ll~e plans? [~Yes L~No Land use is primarily single-family residential on average lot size of 10.000 sq.ft and commercial (marina) u'~e - 8 ls the proposed action compatible with adloming/$~rr(,undlng 13~1d u3es ~thm a ~; mdc./ L~kes F-No 9 ii the proposed action is the subdivision of land. ho~ mans lots ar~ proposed) 2 sections :SS.157 -acres torever'~ild a. What is the minimum lot size proposed~24.959 acres for 40 unit townhouse development fire protection)? ~es D. Informational Details Attach any additional mformat~on as may be needed ~<) clarify ,,o~,r prcqec~ Ir there are or may be ans adver,,,. avoid them. E. Verification ADP Icanprgoo~h_ . Na~.._ ~-J~ P~nnln~/C~orp__ , for Harborview Realty Co. ,, , February 11, 1988 Signatu~ ~(r'~' ( ~/~ [ ,~ ~ Jean A Ce[~nder,~ President ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) The clustering of the buildings reduces the impacts on the natural features of the site and reduces the amount of imper- vious surfaces necessary for road and walkways. It also allows the new structures to remain in the area currently occupied by the unconforming cottages. This project would consist of 40 townhouse units which would be clustered in 10 buildings (4 units per building) along the southern half and the point of the eastern most portion of the property. (See attached site plan.) This configuration follows, in essence, that of the existing 31 substandard cottages and, therefore, would reduce the impact to the site's sensitive natural features. Among the amenities provided for the development would be 40 boat slips, a dock house for storage and 2 tennis courts, all of which would be available for residents only. A total of 90 parking spaces would be provided, 40 of which would be in two 20-car garages. The additional parking would be provided proxi- mate to each townhouse cluster except for 8 spaces, which would be located at the tennis court area. An interior roadway/walkway system would be constructed within the subdivided 24.959 acres. This system would be designed as a private road with access controlled at a gate house at the entrance to the development. Access would be maintained to Main Road, through the dedicated portion of the 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.} The current plan rep~'esents a further improvement in design and protection of environmental features with a significant increase in land area which will be undeveloped and kept forever wild. Although there is a slight increase in the number of units, there are benefits to clustered multi-family units when compared to single-family lots. Census figures have shown that number of persons per unit and less compared to single family Water district records and condominium units have a reduced that water use is substantially homes. Attached homes are energy efficient and land held in common is maintained in a more environmentally responsible and professional manner in terms of landscaping and maintenance. The following information is supplied to further clarify responses to the EAF. The numbered notes refer to the item numbers on the EAF. (Item Al2) Unique Land Forms In addition to the 1.566~ acre island at Conkling Point, which will be kept forever wild, an additional 56.591 acres would remain undeveloped. This acreage includes the 11.551 acres of underwater land. ENVIRONMENTAl, ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAl. INFORMATION (CONT'D.) Test hole data collected in 1985 indicated that soils on-site are capable of supporting sub-surface septic tanks and cesspools. The proposed action would eliminate the present old sub-surface systems which service the existing cottages. (Item B23) Water Use Public water by the Greenport Water District is available on-site via ;~n existinG water main along Sage Road. New connections will be provided to the water main for each of the new residences. Suffi- cient supply of potable water is available to service this development, which is projected to have an maximum water use of 12,000 gallons per day for the summer months. In accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 617 (State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations), the applicant sets forth as indicated by the insignificant effects noted above, that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment and should be issued a Notice of Non-Significance (Negative Declaration) by tile Lead Agency. 11 D'AMATO, FOKCHELLI, LIBERT, SCHWARTZ, MINEO 8 .JOSEPH F. CARLINO COUN5ELORS AT LAW 120 MINEOLA BOULEVARD P O BOX 31 MINEOtA, NEW YOKK 11501 (~16) 248 1700 HAND DELIVERED FEB 1 6 1988 OF COUNSEL dAMESW PA~5 February 16, 1988 Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Application of Harborview Realty Co. to rezone 24.95 acres of parcel commonly known as the "Sage" Property from "A" Residential to M-1 General Multiple Residence Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed herewith are the following documents prepared in conjunction with the above-referenced application requesting a change of zone: 1. Applicant's petition requesting change of zone (3 copies); 2. Notice of rezoning application to adjacent property owners with affidavit of mailing; 3. Full Environmental Assessment Form (EAF, Part One, information narrative, and attachments); 4. Survey/radius maps conforming to Suffolk County Planning Commission requirements (6 copies); 5. Applicant's check for $500.00 non-refundable application fee; and 6. Proposed site plan (6 copies). D'AMATO, FOKCHELLI, LIB£KT, SCHWARTZ, MINEO 8 ,JOSEPH F. CAKLINO COUNSELOR.$ AT LAXY/ Town Clerk Town of Southold Page 2 February 16, 1988 It is respectfully requested that the within Application be placed on the Town Board's February 23, 1988 agenda to facilitate its prompt reference to the Planning Board and the Suffolk County Planning Commission. JDF/ka Enclosures Thank you for your kind assistance in this ma~t~r. Very trul~ yours, / 1 f 12 (Item B13) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) Sewage The project site which is outside Hydrogeologic Zone is located in Hydrogeologic Zone IV, of the deep recharge area of III as defined in the "208 study." According to Suffolk County Health Department regula- tions, a conventional sub-surface sewage disposal system may be approved when the equivalent wastewater flow of 600 gallons per day per acre in Zone IV is not exceeded as long as there is a public water supply available and the soils and groundwater condi- tions are conducive to the proper operation of a sub-surface sewage disposal system. At maximum, each cluster of the proposed development would have a design flow requirement of 1,200 gallons per day (4 ,]nits x 300 gallons per unit). For the total 10 clusters, design flow would equal 12,000 gallons/day which is well within tile 14,975 gallon per day equivalent wastewater flow (24.959 acres x 600 gpd). 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) property, using the existing roadway. This roadway wil2 remain as-is with only minor repairs necessary for safe use (such as pothole repair). In addition to concentraiing the development in the area of the property that contains the existing structures, the site plan will maintain the integrity of wetland areas by observing 75-foot setbacks for all components of the development. The existing bulkhead in the eastern portion of the site along Southold Bay (approximately 375 feet) was severely damaged by Hurricane Gloria (September 27, ]985). The bulkhead will be restored with similar materials to original condition under an existing Army Corps of Engineers permit. A permit granted by the Town Trustees of October 21, 1985 lapsed and a request for its reissuance has been submitted. A previous application for a subdivision entitled "Sage Property, Section 1," was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment (Negative Declaration) and was granted approval by the Southold Planning Board on March 4, 1985. This application was amended on November 6, 1985 and included, in brief, 1. 2. 3. 4. the following modificati¢~ns: single-phased project 23 cluster lots as opposed to 31 lots in two sections removal of non-conforming cottages removal of docks on east side of lagoon and replacement with a floating 18-slip dock on the west side of the lagoon and a smaller 5-sl~p dock Preservation of 32.61 acres of open space. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM HARBORVIEW LANDING SUBDIVISION AND CHANGE OF ZONE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Environmental Assessment From (EAF) is submitted for the proposed action to subdivide 24.959 acres from a 83.117-acre parcel to enable the construction of 40 clustered townhouse units. A change of zone for the subdivided 24.959 acres from the current "Residential A" to "M-I" would be required to permit construction of the attached townbo~lse units. The remaining 58.157 acres, representing 70% of the site, would be preserved and dedicated to the Nature Conservancy or a similar organiza- tion to be held in trust as forever wild. The site, approximately 83 acres, is located east of Main Road (Route 25), north of Taz'pon Drive arid north of Southold Bay in the Town of Southold. The site is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Section 53, Block 5, Lots 12.3 arid 12.4 and is owned by Harborview Realty Co. with offices at 300 Rabro Drive in Hauppauge, New York. The property is currently zoned "Residential-A" and contains 31 substandard, non-conforming cottages. The proposed action would remove the cottages and construct a well-designed, upscale, low-density residential development. A rezone to "~-1" is requested on the development portion of the site (24.959 acres) in order to construct the proposed project. The proposed project would conform, in al/ areas, with the M-1 Multiple Residence District except for the necessity of a variance for the separation between principal buildings. 6 3. Will disturbed areas bc recla~med) [' I'r'(', [ IN,, ~XIN *, 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other Ic,~ ;dl,~-m~po~tant vegetation bt.. r~.mo~e,I b,, this prolect? I~Yes P~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction i8 months. (includ~rlg demohdonl. 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated ~/A (number). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year d. Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent ph,~ses~ ~-3Yes ~]No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? [~Yes EiNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project ~s cornplete 4- 10 Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facdlbes) ~te, ~No it ,,'es. explain Relocation of water and electric service, relocate private road on development portion of site. 12 ls surface liquid waste disposal involved? E~Y~s ~No a. If yes. indicate type or waste (sewage. industrial, etc J and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved~ X~Ye~ ~No Type Sewage 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease b~, proposal? L~Yes Explain ~No 15. Is project or any porbon of project located ~n a 100 year flood platn~ ~'fes L~No 16. Will the project generate solid ~vaste? ~Yes IPNo a. If yes, what is the amoLmt per month 7.62 tons Summer months maximum b. If yes, will an exisbng solid waste facility be used~ ~dYes L~No c. If yes, give name Private sanitation carters Iocabon Town of SouthoLd Landfill e. If Yes, explain 17 Will the project tnvolve the disposal of solid ~,l~to) a If yes, what [s the anticipated rate of disposaU _ N/~.___ ton~/rnonth b. If yes, what ~s the anticipated site hfe? N/A ~uars 18. Will project use herbicides or pest~odes~ E]Yes 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more ttran one hour per day)) lines L~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding th~. local ambient noise levels~ [~Ye* 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use¢ ~',es F_INo If yes, indicate type(s) Domestic electric service (minimal) 22. If water supply is from wells, ~ndicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute 23. Total anticipated water usage per da,,, :12 ~000 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding~ If Yes, explain ~No gallons,'da~, Summer months maximum ~Yes F~No 4 P --PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Projecl Sponsor information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and ~ It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dellendent (m ~ntormattoD currentl,, available and ~ill not in,,ol,,c' NAME OF ACTION Harborview Landing LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and Counly) Sage Road~ Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAMEOFAPPLICANT/SPONSOR Harborview Realty Co. SUSINESSTELEPNONE 1516 ~ 234-3340 ADDRESS 300 Rabro Drive CI~IPO ........ ~] STATE zip CODE Hauppauge ~ NY 11787 NAME OF OWNER (l[ different) J BU$1r~ESS TELEPHONE Harborview Realty Co. , .516. 234-3340 _ AODRESS 300 Rabro Drive CITY/PO j STATE ~ZJPCODE Hauppauge NY ~ 11787 DESCRIPTION OFACTION Subdivision of a portion (24.959acres) of 83.117 acres to provide for townhouse development o~ 40 homes clustered in 10 buildings. The development would require a rezone to M-1. The remaining 58.157 acres would remain undeveloped and be dedi- cated to th~ Nature Conservancy or a like organization which would keep the land in trust and forever wild. Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proiect, both developed and under, eloped areas 1. Present land use: [~Urban ~lndustrial I~lForest ~Agricu[ture 2. Total acreage of project area: 83.117 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, p,tstu~e, t:trZ I Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per.,\rttc[e~ 24. 2', ,,1 I, I ~ Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fdl) Roads, buildings and other paved surface~ Other (Indicate type) Underwater EaCommerc~al [~ Residential (suburban; L~Rural (non-fanuc ~©therWetlands & 31 exist, substandard residential including 11.551 acres underwater PRESENTLY 21.7-- .... acres 27 __ acres _l~_t8 __. acre< 11.6 acres cottages AFTER COMPLETION 2 1 . 3 acre~ ..... 2.6__ _ acre __-. 12_,~8 ..... ac. re> 7~ 4 acres 11,6 acre~ 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on prolect site~ Made land 40%, Haven loam 20%, Riverhead Sandy loam 18% ~anadice ~z~t--loam J. 2% cut ~ fill a. Soil drainage: [~WeJJ drained 38 % of ,dte I~,%.~oclerat~,Jy well drained 62 ,,, of site [~Poorly dramed % of she b. If any agricultural land ~s involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 lhrough 4 Land Classification System? 0____ acres {See 1 NYCRR 370} 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project s,te~ a. VVhat is depth to bedrock? N/A (m feet) CASE NO: ...... ~K....~..~:~... STATE CF NEW YORK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD FEB ! 8 191 ~1~o1~1 Tow. Clerk PETITION IN TH~ 5fATTER OF ~ PETITION OF HARBORVIEW REALTY CO. FOR A C1L~NGE, MODIFICATION OR A~IENDMENT OF THE BUILDING ZONE ORDL~- ANCE OF TPIE TO%VN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NE%V YORK. TO THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD: 1. l~ ....H..a.r.~.o..r..y.i.e..w.....R..e...a...1..t..¥...~.o..: ............ , residing at .~..0..Q...K~.b,r.Q...D.K,i..Y.fla ................ (insert name of petitioner) Hauppauge, NY 11787 Suffolk County, New York, the undersigned, am the owner o£ certain real property situated at Greenport, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York and more particularly bounded and described as follows: SEE ATTACHED 2. I do hereby petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to change, modify and amend the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York, including the Building Zone 5~aps heretofore made a part thereof, as folIows: Change of zoning designation of the above described parcel from "A" Residential-Agricultural Zoning Use District to M-1 General Multiple Residence District. $. Such reqnest is made for thc following reasons: The zoning change sought is limited to 24.95± acres of an 83.00± acre parcel owned by the applicant. The application, accordingly, is limited to the easterly end of the parcel which is presently improved with 31 existing cottages. The remaining 58± acres are proposed for dedication to nature, forever wild. The action proposed would constitute good planning & zoning in the best in- terest of the Town of Southold and its residents. STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) SS:-- COUXTY OF SUFFOLK, ) .......... .~ .CLJ, F~Q~R~D.. ~p.O..L.P..H.. ~,.- ,~-..--.. ~ ~B. EIb'G D.UL~ SWOP. N, deposes and says that / a ~enera± ~artner · in narDu£v±~w Nea±ty ~o. ' he is the ·petitioner in the within action; that he has read the foregoing Petition and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true to his (her) own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and that as to those matters he believes it to be true. (L.S...~.~" ......... Sworn to before me th~s//_~.), d~¥ of ..... ~r.u~:~. ....... ~9..~.~ ,_... ....... :/ ....... :-....,:,:; ....... :. · PAUL H. McDANIE~ ry Pubhc. NOTARY PUBLIC, State of New Yo~ No. 30-4519646 Qualihed in Nassau County ~,~ Commission Expires M~arch 30, 19~~'' BEGINNING at a point in the southwesterly line of the land now or formerly of Posillico Construction Co., Inc., which point is the following courses and distances from point of intersection of the southeasterly line of the land of the Long Island Rail Road with the southwesterly line of the land of James Posillico: 1. S. 45~ 21' 46" E. 205.42 feet to a point in the south- westerly line of the land of James Posillico, 2. S. 55° 49' 26" E. 1875.99 feet along the southwesterly lines of the lands of James Pisillico and of Posillico Construction Co., Inc., and running thence from'said point of beginning S. 55~ 49' 26" E. along the southwesterly line of the land of Posillico Construction Co., Inc. 859.77 feet to the land now or formerly of Anesthesia Group; thence S. 39° 35' 10" E. along the southwesterly lines of the lands of now or formerly of Anesthesia Group and of now oh formerly of William}J. Schneider 1559.41 feet to a point in the approximate mean high water mark. of Shelter Island Sound; thence generally westerly, northeasterly, northwesterly, southwesterly andagain northwesterly along approximate high water marks and along a wooden bulkhead of Shelter Island Sound and of a "basin" off Shelter Island Sound to a point in the easterly line of land now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner, said point being the following courses and distances as measured along aforesaid approximate high water mark and along a bulkhead the following courses and distances: I. S. 8l° 29' 38".W. 21.81 feet 2. N. 74° 33' 18" W. 51.30 feet 3. N. 66° 24' 48" W. 47.68 feet 4. N. 70° 42' 04" W. 96.13 feet 5. S. 89° 20' 28" W. 70.96 feet 6. S. 31° 18m 45" W. 11.31 feet 7. N. 64° 40' 01" W. 197.34 feet 8. N. 64° 37' 42" W. 380.06 feet 9. N. 64° 32' 31" W. 289.24 feet lO. S. 76~ 09' 50" W. 43.85 feet I1. N. 64° 27' 27" W. 220.43 feet 12. N. 17° 10' 37" W. 36.68 feet 13. N. 68° 17' 05" W. 308.25 feet 14. N. 35° 02' 49" E. .143.24~feet 15. N. 69° 08' 00" E. 37.16 feet 16. N. 83° 44' 07" E. 22.45 feet 17. N. 45° 28' 13" E. 22.99 feet 18. N. 1° 13' 46" E. 54.52 feet 19. N. 18° 28' 55" W. 178.54 feet 20. N. 31° 30' 56" W. 40.19 feet 21. N. 67° 19' 26" W. 36.31 feet 22. S. 70° 40' 38" W. 37.59 feet 23. S. 27° 53' 33" W. 29.58 feet 24. S. 0° 16' 23" W. 73.63 feet 25. S. 4° 51' 27" W. 146.85 feet 26. S. 3° 07' 36" W. 168.58 feet 27. S. 36~ 26' 28" E. 25.57 feet 28. S. 7° 04' 51" W. 109.75 feet, 29. N. 49° 17' 24" W. 40.93 feet, 30. N. 2° 15' 32" E. 31.60 feet, 31. N. 48° 14' 49" W. 61.23 feet, 32. N. 57° 36' 28" W. 32.07 feet; thence N. 4° 11' 12" E. along the easterly line of the land now or formerly of Howard and Dorothy Zehner 771.06 feet to the land of Harbor- view Landing Realty Co.; thence N. 4° 11' 12" E. through the land of Harborview Landing Realty Co. 361.44 feet to the point or place of beginning, containing an area of 25.0 acres, more or less. FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM (EXPANDED WITH ATTACHMENTS) FOR HARBORVIEW LANDING RESIDENTIAL PRO3ECT SAGE ROAD, TOWN OF $OUTHOLD Prepared for: Southold Town Planning Board, Lead Agency Town Hal/ Main Road, P.O. Box 728 Southold, NY 11971 Prepared by: JAC Planning Corp. One Overlook Avenue Great Neck, NY 11021 for Harborview Realty Co., Applicant Dated: February 11, 1988 14-1'6;2 (2/87)'-- 7c 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR the question of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby apphcant, and agencies can be assured that the de[ern]~natlon process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allo~ ~ntroduchon of inforrnatio~] to f~t a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a gwen project and its site. By tdentif~mg basic prolect data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible m~pacts that may occur from a project or action It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether d ~s a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an mu)act c~iF~ he mihgated or reduced Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is id~ntmed as poter]t~alR-]drge, then Part 3 is used to e~aluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: rxi Part I [] Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this ~AF !Parts I and 2 and 3 ~f appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both th(. mag~tud(, and mm,~r'r,m,~, ~,l ,',u h .nj)act. it is ruasoaably delermmecJ b~, the lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in am/ large and m~portant .npact(s) and, therefore, ~ one which will not have a significant ~mpact on the en~ironm~mt therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] 13 Although the proJect could have a significant effect on the environment, [here wd] not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Achon because the mit~gahon measures described in PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result in one or more Jarge and mLt3ortant m~pacts that may have a sigmf~cant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration ~s on]~ valid for Unhsted Actions Harborvlew Landing Southold Town Planning Board Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer m I cad .*,gen, . Signature of Responsible Officer ~n Lead &genc~ hb4nah~reotPrel;arer(Ifdifferentfromresponsibleofficer) Date PARO--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Projecl Sponsor NOT[CE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether thP action proposed ma,, ha,.e a 5[gmt~cant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form. Parts ,~ Ih~,~b~h [ Ac,~,,.,or~ to these qLlO~Don~ w~][ be considered information you believe will be needed to complete Par[~ 2 and ~ It is expected that completion of the full EAF wdl be cleper~clent o~ mformat~on currentl~ avadable and will not in,,olve NAME OF ACTION Harborview Landing LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municlpall y and Court y! Sage Road, Town of Southold, Suffolk County NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR Harborview Realty Co. BUSINESS TELEPHONE 1516 ~ 234-3340 ADDRESS 300 Rabro Drive CITY/PO Hauppauge NAME OR OWNER (If different) Harborview Realty Co. ADDRESS 300 Rabro Drive CITY/PO Hauppauge DESGRIPTION ORACT[ON Subdivision of a portion (24.959acres) of 83.117 acres to provide for townhouse development o{ 40 homes clustered in 10 buildings. The development would require a rezone to M-1. The remaining 58.157 acres would remain undeveloped and be dedi- cated to thd Nature Conservancy or a like organization which would keep the land in trust and forever wild. Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall proiect, both developed and undeveloped areas 1. Present [and use: ~lndustnal ~Commerclal I~ResldeRhal [suburban) FqUrban F~Forest [~Agriculture ~OtherWetiands & 31 exist, substandard residential 2. Total acreage of project area: 83.117 acres, APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested AgricuJtural ~lncludes orchard~, crop[and pasture. Wetland (Freshwater or tida[ as per ,\rhcJ~.~ Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type)_ Underwater including 11.551 acres underwater cottages PRESENTL'~ AFTER COMPLETION 21· 7 acres 2 1 · 3 acrf.~, .... 2__7~ ..... .:res :!6_ .......... ai ~,', 1 _2 ..8_ ........ ,cI~'s ___ 12.8 ...... __1_1__.6__ .... acres l~ __ acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on proiect site? Made land 40%, Haven loam 20%, Riverhead Sandy loam 18% Canadi~ silt--loam 12'4. cut & fill 10% a. Soil drainage: ~Wel[ dra,ned 38 % of s~fe [_qModeratelv weft dra;ned 62 . 9~ of site ~Poorly drained % or SdL. b. If any agricultural land is involved, ho~v mans. acres of sod are c]:~ssifiec] within sou group I [hroLi.qh 4 of tt~e Land Classification System? 0 __ acres (See 1 NYCRR 370) 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on prolect s~te~ L]'~es '~No a What is depth to bedrock~ N/A (m reetl 5 ,~proxir~ate percentage Of proposed ~(t s~te w~th ~h,De, O-Ilr!o 100 ~,~ _~ Registers of Historic Places? []Yes 8. What is the depth of the water table?8' Avg. Im It:,.tl Range 5 to 13-feet (Source: 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities pre,entl~, ex~st m the project area? ~:~ es [~Nc E3Yes E~No .According to ~973 Endan&ered Species Act (Fed) ~d~m~5:=em~=$~ NYS Environmental Conservation Law, Section 11-0535 ~St__ate~_ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the prolect >~te~' H.e. cliffs dunes, other geological format,¢>n~j ~Yes ~No Describe 1.566-acre island to be dedicated forever wild. [~Yes [~No If yes, expla,n E~Yes [~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: Wet].and Bond Tributary to Southold gay 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contlguou~ to Droll'ct ;irea a Name Hashamomuck Pond b S~z~. (tn a¢,e~) 172 ac. approx. within 1/2 mile 17I,~ the site served by ex~shng pubhc utilme~? t< '~e, · ;N~ Section 303 and 304? L~Yes ~No of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ElVes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of sohd or ha:ardou~ wastes~ ~J~es 1985 Test Holes) B. Project Description 1 Physical dimensions and scale of project (fr[I In d[me~i4~mh ~,, ,Uqn~,l)rhd,.I b. Project acreage to be developed 24.959 a~ re> ,mhaHv 24.959 c Project acreage to remain undeveloped . 58.%5._7. .... re~ (70%) d Length of project, in miles: 0.85 (If appnlprlate; e If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of ew~an~on proposed N/A f Number of off-street parking spaces existing __6_0_ proposed 90 g Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 22 h. If residential: Number and type of housing umt~ Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed ;tructure 33 ' (upon completion of pro]ectff P.M. Weekday Townhouse/ 4O 40 height. 5~2' w~dth, 125 ~ Ic, ngth Linear feet of frontage along a pubhc ~horoughfar,' prcqecI~dl occupy ~s? as-is ~ Access to Route 25 (Hai~ Road) as e×~stlng Sage Road 2.'"How much natural materiaJ (i.e.. rd earth, etc.1 ~dl be remo~¢,d from the sii 0 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? I lye,, [ IN,, [XlN,.\ a. If yes, for what mtend, .. purpose. ~s thc, site bemg reel,nmi, d/ b. Will topsoil be stockpded for reclamation; I -J'r'~., I ~No C. Will upper subsod be stockpiled for reclan%,tmr~ I I~c~ LJNo 5. Wi[[ any mature forest (over 100 years old) or oti~e~ Io~ all,, mg~ortam ~egetat~on be removed P~ th,s proleCt; E3Yes ~No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construcbon 18 months. (including demolition; 7. ]f muki-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A [number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phaseW [-~Yes L~No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? E}Yes ~lNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction_ L5 __. after project ~s complete 4 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 ,,,ear, (including demoht~on; year 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facllltle,2 ~Ye~ ~No If ,,,es. explain Relocation of water and electric service~ relocate private road on development portion of site. 12 Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? L~,s ~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc I and amount N/A b. Name of water body into which effluent will be d~scharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved~ [x]`,es [~JNo Type Sewage 14. Will surface area of an existing ~vater body increase or decrease by proposal? L~`,'es E~No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located tn a ll)0 year flood plan? ~Yes E3No 16. Will the project generate solid waste? F~Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month 7.62 tons Summer months maximum b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be usc. d/ ~Yes ~No c. If yes, give name Private sanitation carters , ~o(ation Town of Southold Landfill d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal ,vsh'r~, e. If Yes, explain 17 Will the project involve the disposal of solid wast.,' ; Ihe, ~qNo a. If `,,es, what ~s the anticipated rate of disposal~ __ . ~I/A ._. tor~,rnonth b. If yes, what is the antiopated site life~ N/A ~,ears 18 Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ~Ye, ;X~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors /more than one hour per dayl? [3Yes L~No 20 Will project produce operating noise exceedmg th,. local ambient no~se leveIs~ F~`,'es 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ~`,es L3No If yes , indicate type(s) Domestic electrlc service (minimal) bi/A 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capa~_~tv 23. Total anticipated water usage per da`,' 12~000 gallons,'da~ 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? [~Yes ~No If Yes, explain 25. ~,~pprov,~l~ Required: Submittal Date gR~, Town, -~[~gg~ Board kl~es eP~, Town, ~'~,]~,,l~,e Planning Board ~P~,~, Town Zoning Board of Appeals Ix]hes !-INi, ~tt?, County Health Department ~]Yes ~No Other Local Agencies ~'~es L--No Other Regional Agencies State Agencies DEC ~e~ L--N~ Federal Agencies L]~es ~No Town Trustees [~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning If Yes, indicate decision reqLnred' [~zoning amendment l]zomng variance Subdiyision/S~_~a~ Approval S~e3a~e and water Gre__e.~ort Water District Wetlands Permit Wetlands ffending ...... L I>~te plan ~new/revision of master plan ~']resource managt:ment plan [2other 2 What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? Residential A 3 What is the maximum potential development of the s~te ~f developed as permitted b,~ the present zoning~ 31 units existing 4 What is the proposed zonmg of the s~te? M-1 General Multiple - Residence District 5 What is the maximum potential development of the s~te ~f developed as pernntted by the proposed zoning? 40 units 6 Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses ~n adopted local land use plans? [~Yes L~No Land use is primaril~ single-family residential on average lot size of 10~000 sq.ft and commercial (mariha) use 8 Is the proposed action compatible w. ith ac[joining/~urroundmg [and uses ~ithin a "., nnle/ [_~Yes ~-No 9 If the proposed action is the subdivision of [and. hc,~ man~ Iot~ a~e proposed~ 2 sections:58.157-acres foreverT~ild a What is the minimum lot s~ze proposed;24-959 acres for 40 unit townhouse development fire protection)? ~Yes []No D. Informational Details ,Attach any additional information as may be needed t~, claHf,, ~our prolect If there are or ma,, be any ad,er<,' avoid them. E. Verification A)~ can~'~ N'~ J~'~ P~nnin~/R~°rP' for Barborview Realcy Co. Dat. F~bruary 11, 1985 ' .... Si natur6 ~ ' [rth Jean A Cel nder, Pres' ent "lhe aCllonisi, the Coastal Area, and you areaMate with this assessment. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM HARBORVIEW LANDING SUBDIVISION AND CHANGE OF ZONE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Environmental Assessment From (EAF) is submitted for the proposed action to subdivide 24.959 acres from a 83.117-acre parcel to enable the construction of 40 clustered townhouse units. A change of zone for the subdivided 24.959 acres from the current "Residential A" to "M-I" would be required to permit construction of the attached townhouse units. The remaining 58.157 acres, representing 70~ of the site, would be preserved and dedicated to the Nature Conservancy or a similar organiza- tion to be held in trust as forever wild. The site, approximately 83 acres, is located east of Main Road (Route 25), north of Taz'pon Drive and north of Southold Bay in the Town of Southold. The site is designated on the Suffolk County Tax Map as Section 53, ~lock 5, Lots 12.3 and 12.4 and is owned by Harborview Realty Co. with offices at 300 Rabro Drive in Hauppauge, New York. The property is currently zoned "Residential-A" and contains 31 substandard, non-conforming cottages. The proposed action would remove the cottages and construct a well-designed, upscale, low-density residential development. A rezone to "M-i" is requested on the development portion of the site (24.959 acres) in ordez' to construct the proposed project. The proposed project would conform, in all areas, with the M-1 Multiple Residence District except for the necessity of a variance for the separation between principal buildings. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) The clustering of the buildings reduces the impacts on the natural features of the site and reduces the amount of imper- vious surfaces necessary for road and walkways. It also allows the new structures to remain in the area currently occupied by the unconforming cottages. This pro3ect would consist of 40 townhouse units which would be clustered in 10 buildings (4 units per building) along the southern half and the point of the eastern most portion of the property. (See attached site plan.) This configuration follows, in essence, that of the existing 31 substandard cottages and, therefore, would reduce the impact to the site's sensitive natural features. Among the amenities provided for the development would be 40 boat slips, a dock house for storage and 2 tennis courts, all of which would be available for residents only. A total of 90 parking spaces would be provided, 40 of which would be in two 20-car garages. The additional parking would be provided proxi- mate to each townhouse cluster except for 8 spaces, which would be located at the tennis court area. An interior roadway/walkway system would be constructed within the subdivided 24.959 acres. This system would be designed as a private road with access controlled at a gate house at the entrance to the development. Access would be maintained to Main Road, through the dedicated portion of the ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) property, using the existing roadway. This roadway will remain as-is with only minor repairs necessary for safe use (such as pothole repair). In addition to concentrating the development in the area of the property that contains the existing structures, the site plan will maintain the integrity of wetland areas by observing 75-foot setbacks for all components of the development. The existing bulkhead in the eastern portion of the site along Southold Bay (approximately 375 feet) was severely damaged by Hurricane Gloria (September 27, 2985). The bulkhead will be restored with similar materials to original condition under an existing Army Corps of Engineers the Town Trustees of October 21, its reissuance A previous permit. A permit granted by 1985 lapsed and a request for has been submitted. application for a subdivision entitled "Sage Property, Section 1," was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment (Negative Declaration) and was granted approval by the Southold Planning Board on March 4, 1985. This application was amended on November 6, 1985 and included, in brief, 1. 2. 3. 4. the following modifications: single-phased project 23 cluster lots as opposed to 31 lots in two sections removal of non-conforming cottages removal of docks on east side of lagoon and replacement with a floating 18-slip dock on the west side of the lagoon arid a smaller 5-slip dock Preservation of 32.61 acres of open space. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAl. INFORMATION (CONT'D.) The current plan represents a further improvement in design and protection of environmental features with a significant increase in land area which wi]./ be undeveloped and kept forever wild. Although there is a slight increase in the number of units, there are benefits to clustered multi-family units when compared to single-family lots. Water district records and Census figures have shown that condominium units have a reduced number of persons per unit and that water use is substantially less compared to single family homes. Attached homes are energy efficient and land held in common is maintained in a more environmentally responsible and professional manner in terms of landscaping and maintenance. The following information is supplied responses to the EAF. The numbered notes numbers on the EAF. to further clarify refer to the item (Item Al2) Unique Land Forms In addition to the 1.566! acre island at Conkling Point, which will be kept forever wild, an additional 56.591 acres would remain undeveloped. This acreage includes the 11.551 acres of underwater land. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) (Item B13) Sewage The project site is which is outside of Hydrogeologic located in Hydrogeologic Zone IV, the deep recharge area of Zone III as defined in the "208 study." According to Suffolk County Health Department regula- tions, a conventional sub-surface sewage disposal system may be approved when the equivalent wastewater flow of 600 gallons per day per acre in Zone IV is not exceeded as long as there is a public water supply available and the soils and groundwater condi- tions are conducive to the proper operation of a sub-surface sewage disposal system. At maximum, each cluster of the proposed development would have a desi{)n flow requirement of 1,200 gallons per day (4 units x 300 gallons per unit). For the total 10 clusters, gallons/day which per day equivalent 600 gpd). design flow would equal 12,000 is well within the 14,975 gallon wastewater flow (24.959 acres x 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) Test hole data collected in 1985 indicated that soils on-site are capable of supporting sub-surface septic tanks and cesspools. The proposed action would eliminate the present old sub-surface systems which service the existing cottages. (Item B23) Water Use Public water by the Sreenport Water District is available on-site via an existing water main along Sage Road. New connections will be provided to the water main for each of the new residences. Suffi- cient supply of potable water is available to service this development, maximum water use summer months. which is projected to have an of 12,000 gallons per day for the In accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 617 (State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations), the applicant sets forth as indicated by the insignificant effects noted above, that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment and should be issued a Notice of Non-Significance (Negative Declaration) by the Lead Agency. ll 12 TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of HARBORVIEW REALTY CO. to the Town Board of the Town of $outhold. TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to requesta change of zone on the premises hereinafter described. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed ~ follows: Suffolk County tax inapt district 1000r section 53r block 5t p/o lot 12.3 (oc~monly known as the "Sage" property), subject parcel is bounded by adjacent parcels as indicated: WEST: Howard Zehner (Young's Marina)~ NO~I~H: Posillico Construction Co~y; NOR1/qFJLST: Anesthesia Group P.C. and William J. Schneider; SOU~I: Shelter Island Sound. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: "A" Residential - A~ricultural Zoning Use District 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: M-1 General Multiple Residence District . The request is limited to the easterly area where the existinq cottages are located. 5. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be filed in the $outhold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the r0atter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long Island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: February 16, 1988 Harborview Realty Co.' Petitioner Post Office Address: HauDpau~e, New York 117~7 LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS Lynn F. Sciora, 407 River Avenue, Beaver, PA 15009 Raymond Ciacia, Greenport, NY 11944 John E. Rempe, 4310 Bayshore Road, Greenport, NY 11944 George L. Penny, Inc., c/o George L. Penny IV, Main Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Bros. Corazzini, 56240 Main Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Theresa Casamisina, 14 Julia Lane, East Northport, NY 11731 Charles Krepp, 205-01 34th Avenue, Bayside, NY 11361 Frank Carlucci, 157-48 24th Avenue, Whitestone, NY 11357 Michael A. Koscis, 14 Island View Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 Donald F. Jones, 97 Noble Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222 Ethel Dudley, P.O. Box 636, Greenport, NY 11944 Richard Burkhardt, 321 West 24th Street, New York, NY 10011 Edwin M. Latson, 1425 Island View Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 William J. Schneider, 20 Gilbert Street, Yonkers, NY 10701 John H. Mulholland, 71 Old Zoar Road, Monroe, Conn. 06468 Derek Morcombe, 725 Island View Lane, Madeline Keufner & Katherine Jarres, Glendale, NY 11385 Murray & Selma Jacobs, 5 Diamond Drive, Joseph W. Suda, P.O. Box 65, Greenport, Greenport, NY 11944 64-71 74th Avenue, Plainview, NY NY 11944 Joseph Knizak, 5 Perigee Drive, Stony Brook, NY 11790 William F. Killan, P.O. Box 186, Greenport, NY 11944 Harold Reese, 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, NY 11563 11803 Thomas F. & Joan F. Gleason, Northport, NY 11731 Seymour & Adelaide Brittman, Northport, NY 11731 Willard H. & Claire A. Barry, NY 11530 5 Furwood Drive, East 14 Leland Street, East 166 Roxbury Road, Garden City, Robert & Linda Bracken, 32 Linchfield Road, Port Washington, NY 11050 Frank A. Santamaria, 220 Colonial Road, North Babylon, NY 11703 Frank M. & Ingeborg L. Flynn, P.O. Box 144, Southold, NY 11971 Charlotte Weisman, Tarpon Drive, Southold, NY 11971 Robert H. Chilton, Beachwood Lane, Southold, NY 11971 Southold Shores Assoc., Inc., P.O. Box 263, Southold, NY 11971 Andrew F. & Carole Cassidy & Others, 1815 Albertson Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 James Melrose, 41 Robinson Road, Greenport, NY 11944 James Posillico, 31 Tennyson Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590 Posillico Construction Company, Inc., 31 Tennyson Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590 Mary Barsczewski, c/o Stanley Bladzinski, Southold, NY 11971 Anesthesia Group P.C., c/o Bertram S. Holder M.D., 356 Clinton Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11238 Joseph A. LaColla, c/o Mill Creek Liquors, Southold, NY 11971 Howard Zehner, P.O. Box 250, Greenport, NY 11944 SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS & PLANNERS June 14, 1988 · .['-!" ", '7!3 Mrs. Judith T. Terry Town Clerk Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: Harborview Landing Change of Zone Application Dear Judy, Please find enclosed, for your records, a copy of the scoping checklist and notes from the May 26th scoping session for the above mentioned proposal. We will forward a copy of each to Jean Celender as well. Ms. Celender will be preparing the DEIS. Please do not hesistate to contaot me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, David J.S. Emilita, AICP Principal Planner DJSE:mt Enclosure cc: Jean Celender 23 Narragansett Ave. Jamestown, RI 02835 (401) 423-0430 Scoping Session Harborview Landing Change of Zone May 26, 1988 Present were David Emilita, Diane Schultze, Lisa Marino and Barbara Szepatowski of Szepatowski Associates, Inc. (SAI), Jean Celender for the applicant and staff member from her office, the applicant, and Melissa Spiro, Planner from the Town of Southold Planning Board. The purpose of this meeting was to advise the applicant what would be required in the DEIS for the proposed change of zone. Mr. Emilita advised that the following would need to be included in the DEIS from the scoping checklist: I. Cover Sheet II. Table of Contents and Summary III. Description of the Proposed Action A. -Project Purpose, Need and Benefits 1-4 B. -Location Items 1-4 C. -Design and Layout Items 1-4 D. -Construction and Operation Items 1-2 F. -Approvals Items 1-2 It was noted that depending on approvals, construction would be not more than 1 construction season, however, if it were more there would be concern about layover. IV. Environmental Setting A. Geology 2. Surface items a-e 3. Topography a 2" interval is acceptable SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENx.'If(ONh,IEN]AL CON%ULI&NIs B. Water Resources Groundwater items a-b Surface water items a-d The surface water to be discussed includes the water to the East of the existing access road and the water quality within the Bay. D. Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology items 1-3 E. Agricultural Resources - are not required to be addressed. Human Resources A. Transportation Transportation items a-b. Traffic counts are required for Main Road (Rt. 25) and Sage Blvd., Kerwin and Main Road (Rt. 25) and August Acres road intersection with Kerwin. It was noted that the spur road from the August Acres subdivision road will be the main access into the site and the access from Sage Blvd. to Main Road will be secondary. The traffic for the traffic count should be weekend, seasonal traffic. Consideration of existing traffic conditions from the cottages may also be taken into account. It was noted that the marina continues use over the existing right-of-way which they have and will not be allowed to use the proposed right-of-way. There is no right-of-way passage over the existing right-of-way for the existing cottages since they are only seasonal rental units. B. Land Use and Zoning Items~l-3 It was noted that the wetlands in close proximity to the proposed access road should be flagged, however, it would not be necessary to flag the entire site. A mechanism to preserve the "forever wild" land is to be included. The existing land use, adopted master plan, and proposed zoning should be indicated. A public benefit for the change of zone should also be indicated. The project description should show the layout. Community Services 2. Police Protection 3. Fire Protection 8. Public Water Supply ~l 1~. Sewage Treatment Facilities SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. ENVIRONMEN1AL CONSUL[ANTS These services should be described to the degree that an impact is anticipated. The above four should be discussed in depth and to a lesser degree the following: education facilities, health care facilities, social services, recreational facilities, utilities and solid waste disposal. Demography - there should be a general discussion of this. Cultural Resources 1. Visual Resources items a-c any elevations of the buildings should be included. 2. Historic and Archaeological Resources items a-b. The archaeological resources should include a statement from a recognized source. Significant Environmental Impacts - The following should be discussed: - Construction in a flood zone - Dredging - It was noted that there may be dredging to deepen the dock area. - Documentation for Suffolk County Department of Health Services and Village of Greenport. It was agreed that there could be a parallel review of the DEIS and Health Department review. - Rare and endangered species - areas that may be disturbed should be reviewed and discussed. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environmental Impact should be discussed. VII. Adverse Environmental Effects should be discussed. VIII. Alternatives Items C-F This should also include a discussion on the existing and proposed zoning, the present application, no action, continuing the existing use, and R-40 zoning. Construction staging and time is not an important consideration. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources should be discussed. SZEPATOWSKI ASSOCIATES INC. [NVIRON/X,IEN] A[ CONSU LIAN 1% Appendix D State Environmental Quality Review Scoping Checklist The following checklist of topics is intended as a starting point for developing a detailed scope for a project-specific Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Typically, no one project will require a discussion of all the topic areas contained in this document. Through the scoping process, the list of topics should be refined to reflect issues unique to the proposed project. Topic areas may be de- leted, added or elaborated upon, to arrive at the final scoping document. The purpose of the checklist format is to iden- tify the basic topic areas of the Draft ElS. This is accomplished by reviewing the list and placing a check in the box located to the left of these topics which should be discussed. The model scoping checklist can also be used as a worksheet, including comments, suggestions and identifica- tion of the particular example(s) that are relevant to a detailed discussion of the topic or issue that has been checked. Conversely, those topics which are not checked, are issues not associated with the project and may be eliminated from discussion in the Draft ElS. The next step is to expand the list to include or elaborate on those topics unique to the pro- posed project. A blank sheet is included at the end of the checklist for such additional information. The scoping process involves several steps in addition to compiling a list of topics. Scoping also includes discussions on the quantity and quality of informaton required and the methods of obtain- ing that data. NOTE; This check list was designed to be used in conjunction with the section on scoping contained in SEQR Guideline-Draft and Final ElS's, It is also important to emphasize that this checklist should serve only as a model to assist in the scoping of a Draft ElS. It should not be used as a substitute for actively scoping Draft ElS for a specific project. I. Cover Sheet All EIS's (Draft or Final) shall begin with a cover sheet that includes: A. Whether it is a draft or final statement B. Name or other descriptive title of the project C. Location (county and town, v'iliage or city) of the project D. Name and address of the lead agency which required preparation of the state- ment and the name and telephone number of a person at the agency to be contacted for further information E. Name and address of the preparers of any portion of the statement and a contact name and telephone number F. Date of acceptance of the Draft ElS G. in the case of a Draft ElS, the deadline date by which comments are due should be indicated ,,-"Il. Table of Contents and Summary A table of contents and a brief summary are re- quired for Draft and Final EIS's. The summary should include: A. Brief description of the action B. Significant, beneficial and adverse ira- pacts, (issues of controversy must be specified) C. Mitigation measures proposed D. Alternatives considered E. Matters to be decided (permits, approvals, funding) · "11I. Description of the Proposed Action Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the draft ElS. [] A. PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED AND BENEFITS 1. Background and history 2.Public need for the project, and municipality objectives based on ad- :? opted community developments plans 3. Objectives of the project sponsor 4. Benefits of the proposed action a.) social b.) econorqic ~ B. LOCATION 1.Establish geographic boundaries of the project (use of regional and local scale maps is recommended) 2. Description of access to site 3.Description of existing zoning of proposed site 4.Other: · ~ C. DESIGN AND LAYOUT 1 .Total site area a.) proposed impervious surface area (roofs, parking lots, roads) b.) amount of land to be cleared c.) open space 2.Structures a.) gross leaseable area (GLA), if applicable b.) layout of buidings (attached, enclosed, separate) c.) site plans and profile view d.) material storage e.) drainage plans f.) above/underground pipelines g.) staging area for material handling 3.Parking a.) pavement area b.) number of spaces and layout 4.Other: [~"-D. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION 1. Construction a.) tota! construction period anticipated b.) schedule of construction c.) future potential development, on site or on adjoining properties d.) other: 2.Operation a.) type of operation b.) schedule of operation c.) other: "~_. ~LO$CiRE AND ?OST CLOS'.3','7.£ PL~'NS (for projects of planned limited life such as landfills) ~. APPROVALS 1.Required changes or variances to the zoning regulations 2.Other permit approval or funding reguirements IV. Environmental Setting .:t' Place a check in the box to the left of those topics to be included in the Draft ElS. Natural Resource t~/A. GEOLOGY a.I composition and thickness of subsurface material examples: --depth to, and nature of, bedrock formations and impermeable layers --occurrence of an extractive mineral resource --usefulness as construction material 2.b.I earthquake potential Surface a.) List of soil types b.) discussion of soil characteristics examples: --physical properties (indication of soils hydrological (infiltration) capabilities) --engineering properties (soft bearing capacity) --agricultural properties (soil profile characteristics) when agri- cultural land resources are involved c.) distribution of soil types at project site d.) suitability for use examples: --agriculture --recreation --construction --mininq e.) other: [~3 .Topography a.) description of topography at project site examples: --slopes --prominent or unique features b.) description of topography of sur- rounding area [i~B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) location and description of aquifers and recharge areas examples: --depth of water table --seasonal variation --quality --quantity --flow b.) identification of present uses and level of use of groundwater ~;xamples: --location of existing wells --public/private water supply --industrial uses --agricultural uses C 2. Surface water a.) location and decription of surface waters located on project site or those that may be influenced by the project examples: --seasonal variation --quantity --classification according to New York State Department of Health b.) identification of uses and level of use of all surface waters examples: --public/private water supply --industrial uses --agricultural uses --recreational c.) description of existing drainage areas, patterns and channels d. discussion of potential for flooding, siltation, erosion and eutro- phication of water supply [] 1 .Climate a.) discussion of seasonal variations and extremes examples: --temperature --humidity --precipitation --wind [] 2. Air quality a.) description of existing air quality levels examples: · :--Iist the National and State Air Quality Standards for the project area and the compliance status for each standard b.) identification of existing sources or pollutants-fixed or mobile c.) identification of any sensitive recepters in project area examples: --hospitals, schools, nursing homes, parks d.) description of existing monitoring D program (if applicable) · TERRESTRAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY 1. Vegetation a.) list vegetation types on the project site and within the surrounding area b.) discussion of site vegetation characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance --age --size --distribution --dominance --community types --unique, rare and endangered species --value as habitat for wildlife --productivity [] 2. Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife a.) list of fish, shellfish and wildlife species on the project site and within surrounding area, including migatory and resident species b.) discussion of fish, shellfish and wildlife population characteristics examples: --species presence and abundance --distribution --dominance --unique, rare and endangered species --productivity [] 3. Wetlands a.) list wetland areas within or contiguous to the project site b.) discuss wetland characteristics examples: --acreage --vegetative cover --classification --benefits of wet]and such as floo~ and erosion control, recreation ~E. AGR;CCiETdRAL I. Soils a.) list soils by name, slope and soil group ranking within NYS Land Classification System (1 NYCRR 370) b.) number of acres within each group c.) location of site on soil survey map [] 2.Agricultural land management systemls) a.) inventory of existing erosion control and drainage systems examples: --subsurface drain lines --outlet/diversion ditches --strip cropping --diversion terraces b.) relationship of proposed action to existing soil and water conservation plans (if applicable) [] 3. Associated oFerations a.) number and ~ypes of farm operation,~. on and adjacent to site examples: --dairy --grain --orchard b.) type and proximity of farm related facilities examples: --storage units/barns --sorting/packing houses --refrigeration units --roadside markets c.) access to cropland (including detached fields) d.) access for farm equipment to public roads Human Resources [] A. TRANSPORTATION [] !.Transportation services a.) description of the size, capacity and condition of services examples: --roads, canals, railroads, bridges --parking facilities --traffic control --access/egress from site b.) description of current level of use of services examples: --a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic flow --vehicle mix · --source of existing traffic a.) description of the current avail- ability of service b.) description of present level of use [] B. LAND USE AND ZONING [] !.Existing land use and zoning a.) description of the existing land use of the project site and the surrounding area examples: --commercial --residential --agricultural --business --retail --industrial --vacant b.) description of existing zoning of site and surrounding area c. description of any affected agri- cultural district or other farmland retention program boundary in and surrounding the site [] 2.Land use plans a.I description of any land use plans or master plans which include project site and surrounding area b.i discussion of future development trends or pressures [] 3. Other; [] C. COMMUNITY SERVICE (for this section include a list of existing facilities and a discussion of existing levels of usage and projected future needs) [] I .Educational facilities ~ 2.Police protection [~ 3. Fire protection [] 4. Health care facilities [] 5. Social services [] 6.Recreational facilities [] 7. Utilities E~/ 8. Public water supply [] 9.Solid waste disposal I~ 10.Sewage treatment facilities [] 1!.Other: ~'"'D. DEMOGRAPHY [] l.Population characteristics a.) discussion of existing population parameters examples: --distribution --density --household size and composition b.) discussion of projections for popu- lation growth [] 2.Other: ~/~-E. CULTURAL RESOURCES ~'""1. Visual resources a.) description of the physical char- acter of the comnrunity examples: --urban vs. rural b.) description of natural areas of significant scenic value c.) identihcation of structures of significant architectural design · Historic and archaeological resources a.) location and description of historic areas or structures listed on State or National Register or designated by the community, or included on Statewide Inventory C b.) identification of sites having potential si~?ificant archaeological value include results of cultural resource survey, if conducted a.) identification of existing level of noise in the community b.) identification of major sources of noise examples --airports --major highways --industrial/commercial facilities [] 4.Other: V. Significant Environmental impacts Identify those aspects of the environmental setting in Section IV that may be adversely or benefidaIly affected by the proposed action and require discussion. VI. Mitigation Measures to Minimize Environ- mental Impact. Describe measures to reduce or avoid poten- rial adverse impacts identified in Section V. The following is a brief listing of typical measures used for some of the major areas of impact. Natural Resource [] A. GEOLOGY I. Subsurface a.) use excavated material for land reclamation b.) use facility wastes (ash, sludge) for land reclamation c.) other: 2. Surface a.) use topsoil stockpiled during construction for restoration and landscaping b.) minimize disturbance of non- construction sites c.) design and implement soil erosion control plan d.) other: 3. Topography a.) avoid construction on areas of steep slope b.) design adequate soil erosion devices to protect areas o[ steep slope c.) other: [] B. WATER RESOURCES 1. Groundwater a.) design/modify system of treatment for stormwater runoff of wastewater prior to recharge of groundwater b.) maintain permeable areas on the site c.) institute a program for monitoring water quality in adjacent wells d.) require secondary or tertiary con- tainment of products/wastes e.) contingency plans for accidental spills f,) other; 2. Surface water a.) ensure use of soil erosion control techniques during construction and operation to avoid siltation examples: --hay bales --temporary restoration of vega- ration to disturbed areas --landscaping b.) design adequate stormwater control system c.) construct/modify sewage treatment facilities d.) restrict use of salt or sand for road and parking area snow removal e,) avoid direct discharges to surface water resources f.) require secondary or tertiary containment of products/wastes g.) contingency plans for accidental spills h.) other: [] C. AlE RESOURCES I .Air quality a.) assure proper construction practices examples: --fugitive dust control --proper operation and mainten- ance of construction equipment b.) design traffic improvements to re- duce congestion and vehicle delay c.) install and ensure the proper operation of emission odor control devices d.) initiate a program for monitoring of air quality e.) other: [] D. TERRESTRALAND AQUATIC ECOLOGY !. Vegetation a.) restrict clearing to only those areas necessary b.) preserve part of site as a natural area c.) after construction, landscape site ~jth naturally occurring vegetation d.) purchase open space at another location and dedicate to local government or conservation organization 5 2. Fish, Shellfish and Wildlife a.) provide adequate habitat (shelter and food) for remaining wildlife species b.) schedule construction to avoid sensitive periods of fish, shellfish and wildlife cycles c.) other: [] E. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES I. Soils a.) select/design project to avoid viable agricultural land b.) reclaim disturbed agricultural soil profiles for agricultural purposes c.) schedule activity when crops are off fields and soil is firm d.) other: 2. Agricultural land management systems a.) re-establish access drives, fence-- lines and any disturbed land management systems b.) re-establish any disturbed erosion control and drainage systems c.) install soil and water management practices to restore or enhance soil drainage and stability d.) preserve open space for agricultural use e.) develop lease back arrangements to allow continued agricultural use on all or portion of site f.) other: Human Resources [] A. TRANSPORTATION 1. Transportation a.) design adequate and safe access to project site to handle projected traffic flow b.) install adequate traffic control devices c.) optimize use of parking areas d.) encourage car pooling and oper- ation of facility during non-peak traffic times e.) design special routing and rest.ricted hours for delivery truck traffic f.) other: 2. Public transportation a.) adjust public transportation routes and schedules to service the facility b.) encourage use of public transpor- tation by using incentive programs for employees or by selling tickets in facility c.) other: [] B. LAND USE AND ZONING 1 .Ex sting land use and zoning a.) design project to comply with existing land use plans b.) design functional and visually appealing facility to set standard and precedent for future surround- ing land use c.) other: [] C. COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Police protection a.) minimize local police protection responsibilities by providing private security force b.) provide security systems, alarms for facility c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 2. Fire protection a.) use construction materials that minimize fire hazards b.) incorporate sprinkler and alarm systems into building design c.) provide equipment, funds or ser- vices directly to the community d.) other: 3. Utilities a.) install utility services underground b.) incorporate water saving fixtures into facility design c.) incorporate energy-saving measures into facility design d.) other: [] D. CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Visual resources a.) design exterior of structure to physically blend with existing surroundings b.) minimize visual impact through thoughtful and innovative design of lighting and signs (consider: height, size. intensity, glare ~,nd hours of ligl~ting operation) c.) design landscaping to be ,,isuall\, pleasing and to serve as a buffer between surrounding lana uses. parking areas, operational equip- ment and facilities d.) other: 2. Historic and archaeological resources a.) Prepare a plan. including measures to mitigate impacts to historic/ archaeological resources through data recovery, avoidance and/or restriction of project activities £-4O b.) develop measures to convey cul- tural information to the community (e.g. through scientific/popular reports, displays) c.) preserve architecturally signifi- cant structures and make an adequate permanent photographic and statistical record of those that must be destroyed d.) other: 3. Noise a.) schedule construction/operation to occur during "normal business" hours minimizing noise impact during sensitive times (early morn- 'lng, night) b.) assure adherence to construction noise standards c.) design berms and landscaping to block and absorb noise d.) other: VII. Adverse Environmental Effects that Cannot be Avoided if the Project is Implemented Identify those adverse environmental effects in Section V that can be expected to occur regard- less of the mitigation measures considered in Section VI. VIII. Alternatives This section contains categories of alterna- tives with examp]es. Discussion of each alternative should be at a level su[ficient to permit a compara- tive assessment of costs, benefits and environmen- tal risks for each alternative. It is not acceptable to make simple assertions that a particular alter- native is or i~not feasible. Identify those categories of alternatives which should be included in the ElS by placing a check in the box located to the ~eft of the topic. [] A. ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGIES "~,,,lt'- I . Site layout e.) density and ~ocation of structures 1. Limiting factors a.) availability of land b.) suitability of alternative site to accomodate design requirements c.) availability of utilities d.) suitable market area e.) compatibility with local zoning and master plan f.) compatibility with certified agri- cultural districts g.) compatibility with regional objectives h.) accessibility of site to transporta- tion routes and service population ALTERNATIVE SIZE 1 .Increase or decrease project size to minimize possible impacts 2. Increase or decrease project size to correspond to market and community needs ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION/ OPERATION SCHEDULING 1. Commence construction at a di[ferent time 2. Phase construction/operation 3. Restrict construction/operation work schedule E. ALTERNATIVE LAND USE 1 .Suitability of site for other uses a.) other types of commercial uses b.) other types of industry c.) different types of housing d.) agricultural use e.) other: F. NO ACTION I.Impacts of no action a,) effect on public need b.) effect on private developers' need c.) beneficial or adverse environmental impacts [] G. OTHER: b.) location of access routes, parking and utility routes 2. Orientation a.) compatibility with slope and dra!nage p,~tterns b.) site size and set back requirements 2 .Technology a.) pollution control equipment b.) innovative vs. proven technologies 4.Mix of activities a) addition o[ businesses which would affect the operational nature of the facility IX. Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Identify those natural and human resources listed in Section IV that will be consumed, convert- ed or made unavailable for future use. X%. Q'r_-'wth :.-.fluci,,~ A~F,~-L~ (if applicable) Describe in this section the potential growth aspects the proposed project may have. Listed on the next page are examples of topics that are typi- cally affected by the growth induced by a project. [] A. POPULATION 1.Increases in business and resident population due to the creation or relocation of business 2. Increases in resident population due to the construction of housing [] B. SUPPORT FACILITIES 1. business created to serve the increased population 2. Service industries created to supply new facility [] C. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1 .Introduction or improvement of infra- structure (roads, waste disposal, sewers, water) to service proposed project 2. Creation of further growth potential by construction of improved infra- structure [] D. OTHER: Energy Resources (if applicable) Identify the energy sources to be used, anticipated levels of consumption and ways to reduce energy consumption. The examples listed below are typical issues to be considered when ad- dressing this topic. [] A.PROPOSED ENERGY SOURCES AND ALTERNATIVES [] B.ANTICIPATED SHORT-TERM/LONG- TERM LEVELS OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION [] C.INDIRECT EFFECTS ON ENERGY CON$~JMPTION ! .Increased dependence on automobile use 2. increased levels of traffic due to proposed project I~ D.ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES 1 .Design methods to reduce fuel use for heating, cooling and lighting a.) conventional technology examples: --insulation --thermopane windows --use of Iow wattage lights b.) innovative technology examples: --heat pumps --solar panels --wind energy --use of waste heat from an industrial plant --use of recycled materials c.~ efficient layout examples: --orientation of structures in relation to summer and winter sunlight --clustering of structures to maximize common walls --shortening ol~ utility runs --shared insulation and heating 2. Indirect energy benefits a.) location and design of facility to accomodate mass transit b.) use of shuttle buses c.) location of facility to minimize travel distance [] E. OTHER: XII. Assessment of Unavailable Information In certain situations involving major develop- ments (such as an oil supertanker port, a liquid propane/natural gas storage facility, a resource recovery facility or a hazarduous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility), information regarding reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment may not be available. Such informa- tion may be unavailable because the means to ob- tain it are unknown or the cost of obtaining it is exhorbitant, or because there is uncertainty about its validity. If such information is essential to an agency's SEQR finding, the ElS must: A. Identify the nature and relevance of such unavailable or uncertain information; and B. Provide a summary of existing credible scientific evidence , if available; and C. Assess the likelihood of occurrence and consequences of the potential impact, even if the probability is Iow, using the- oretical approaches or research methods generally accepted in the scientific community. This assessment should be applied only where reasonably foreseeable catastrophic impacts to the environment are possible and it is not intended to be applied in the review of such actions as shop- ping malls, residential subdivisions and commer- cial facilities even though the size and scale of some such projects may be extensive. XIII. Appendices Following is a list of materials typically used in support of the ElS. A. List of underlying tudies, reports and information considered and relied on in preparing statement 13. List ail federal, state, regional, or local agencies, organizations, consultants and private persons consulted in preparing the statement C. Technical exhibits (if any) at a legible scale D. Relevent correspondence regarding the projects may be included (required in the Final ElS) Additional Draft ElS Scoping Topics Indicate any additional topics for discussion in the Draft ElS. Attach additional sheets if necessary. 9 JUDITH T. TERRY TOWN CLERK OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONI~ ~516~765'1801 Pursuant to Sections 1323 and 1332 of the Suffolk County Charter the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby refers the following proposed zoning action to the Suffolk County Department of Planning: X New Zoning Ordinance Amendment of Zoning Cod~ Amendment of Zoning Map (Change of Zone) Location of affected land: Sage Boulevard, Greenport, Town of Southold, New York Suffolk County Tax Map No.: Within 500 feet of: 1000-53-5-12.3 & 12.4 The boundary of any village or town The boundary of any existing or proposed county, state or federal park. X The right-of-way of any existing or proposed county or state parkway, thruway, expressway, road or highway. The existing or proposed right-of-way of any stream or drainage channel owned by the County or for which the County has established channel lines. The existing or proposed boundary of any other county, state or federally owned land. The Long Island Sound, any bay in Suffolk County or estuary of any of the foregoing bodies of water. Or within one mile of:. Nuclear power plant. Airport COMMENTS: Recommendation of the Southold Town Plannina Board attached hereto. Date: Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk · 14-1;~-~ '(2~8 7)':-- 7c SEQR (* ' 617.21 ( Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge m one parbcul.lr ama ma~ ,lot be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby, apphcant., and a~enc~es can be aSsLired that the determmahon process has been orderly, comprehenswe in nature, yet fJexd~Je to allow ~ntroduct~on of information to ht a project or action Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts' Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a g~ven project and its s~te By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3 Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible H'npacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whedmr an my)act can be mitigated or reduced Part3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large then Part 3~s used to e~aluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~J Part I ~ Part 2 []Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF iParts 1 and 2 and ~ ~f appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magdud(, ,md iiIip,~rl,lrl('l, iH' i',t( I/ inlp;l('l, it is re,l~onabb,, duterminnd by thc lead agency that: [] A. The project will not result in any large anct important ~mpact(sJ and. therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the envlronmer~t therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the project could have a sigmf~cant effect on the environment, there wdl not be a significant effect for this Unhsted Action because the mibgation measures described m PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [] C The project may result in one or more large and m'~portant m~pacts that may have a s~gmf~cant ilz, pact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared· * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only vahd for LJnhsted ,\croons Harborview Landing Southold Town Planning Board Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in [ cad *,gerl~,, Signature of Responsible Officer m Lead .-\genc~, 5~grlature ot Pre~ar( r ( f d f erent from responsible officer) Date "' PAR('- --PROJECT INFORMATION (~ Prepared b,~ Proiect Sponsor NOTICE: This document is destgned to assk~t ~n det£.rrr, r,m,~ ,.,.h~.dmr th,. a~ t,,.,r~ pr,,p,~.,J ih.i, h.'.~ ,~ ~ , , r , [!c, ' information you believe ,,viii be needed to complete Pa~t>; .,r~d , It is expected that completion of the full EAFw. ill bedcl.'.(h'rlt ,,~ mto~.,aLu)n (uru'nrl. J,..h,hh. ar, d ,,,dl r,,,t.H~. ,.,' each instance. Harborview Landing . _ LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Mun,c~pality and Co Jnt,~ Sage Road, Town of Southotd, Suffolk County NAME OF ARPLICANTISPONSOR Harborview Realty Co. ADDRESS 300 Rabro Drive CITY/PO Hauppauge NAME OR OWNER (If dlfferenb Harborview Realty Co. ADDRESS 300 Rabro Drive ~516, 23~-3340 NY 117S7 _ ! _516 234-3340 CITY/PO Hauppauge DESCRIPTION OF ACT[ON Subdivision of a portion (24.959acres) of g3.117 acres to provide for townhouse development of 40 homes clustered in i0 buildings. The development would require a rezone to M-1. The remaining 56.157 acres would remain undevelop=d and be dedi- cated to th~ Nature Conservancy or a like organization which would keep the land in trust and forever wild. Please Complete Each Question- Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall prolect, both develop~-d ,:nd und<:,,clope,J 6rca~ 1. Present land use: [~Urban F~lndustrial L~C.'Jmmerc,al ~Res,denb,d ISLIbLIFbdIU /Rur.d ,n~m :.,,~ [~Forest ~Agriculture ~]OtherWetlands & 31 exist, substandard residential 2. Total acreage of project area: 83.117 acre% APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agr,cultural (Includes orchards, cropland I),':[ur~ .... , . Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per ,%rt~t h,. 2.1 '- I , [ , Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or Roads, buildings and other paved including 11.551 acres underwater cottages Other (Indicate type) Underwater I1 ..~ ..~ r~.: 11 3. What is predominant soil type[s) on prole¢~ s~teg Made land 40%, Haven loam ~-~' Riverhead Sandy loam CanadiC~-~II I~12%, cut & fill a. Soil drainage: ~Well drained 38 % ,)f ~t~' ']'.~od,~rat,,I,, well c{rJ,~r~ed ~2 , ,~ ,t, Land Classification Svstem~ 0 acres ISee 1 N~CRR a. What is depth to bedrock~ ~/A rm Registers of Historic Places,~ OYes ~No 8. What i$ the depth of thewater table~8' Avg' (m le~,u Range 5 to i3-feet (gource: 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunitms presently ,,x~st ,n th(, project area? .'~', es []Yes []No According to 1973 Endangered Species Act (Fed) k~m+~::~h:s~e~e~ NY$ Environmental ConserYation Law, Section 11-0535 (St__ate,___ 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the prole~t .~te~ H.e, chffs, dunes, other geological ~Yes [No Describe 1.566-acre island to be dedicated forever wild. 1985 Test Holes) ~Yes ~No If yes, explain E]Yes ~-~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to prolect area Wetland Pond Tributary to Southold Bay 16 Lakes, ponds, wetland areas w~thin or contiguous to project area a. Name Hashamomuck Pond 17. I,, the site served by ex~sting pubhc ubht~e~~ ~J~ ~ , ~Nc, a} i~ Yes, does sufficient capacKv ex~st to allo~, connecth'm; b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary h, ,fllm~ , ,,,]~, r [I,,~/ b S,ze lin acreq 172 ac. approx. within 1/2 mile Secbon 303 and 304? []Yes ~No of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 []Yes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of prolect (flu in dimen,,~on~ ,,-, b. Project acreage to be developed 24.959 acr~,~ mmalh,, 24.959 . e. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 58.157 ,h~,s (707.) d. Length of project, in miles: 0.85 lit appropnate/ e. If the project is an expansion, ~ndicate percent of ~xp, ~ on proposed N/A ~,~. f. Number of off-street parkmg spaces exlstmg 60 proposed 90 g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 22 lupon compleuon of project? P.M. Weekday h. If residential: Number and type of housmg uniI_, To~nhouse/ Initially fl0 Ultimately 40 i Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure __3~'_.~_ height 52' width; 125~ length. i Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughiare HHq(,~ t wRi occupy ~s? as-is Access to Route 25 (Main Road) as existing Sage Road natural mate. rial (l~. r,~. 3. Will disturbed areas be re(.lalmc, d~ I ~'~.~, c %¥il[ upper subsod be ftockpdc, cl tot H'~ I,lm.,H*,h ' :~ ," , IN~ ~Yes ~No 6. If single phase proiect: .Anticipated period of COIl~Lr/Ii thlrl 1_,~ 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated N/A (rmmber~ b. ,Anticipated date of commencement phase t c. Approximate completion date of final phase d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent 8. Will blasting occur dur ng construction? C]Yes 9. Number of jobs generated, during :onstruct on 1.5 10 Number of jobs eliminated b'~ this prelect Relocation of water and electric service~ relocate p~riva_t_e ro~a_d on deve~o~2_me~nt~ortion of site. b. Name of water body ~nto which effluent will be ch~charged 13. Is subsurface liquid ~aste disposal Lnvolved~ ~1~- I]No Type Explain 16 Will the project generate solid w,lste) i;~'(~.~ I IN,, b If yes, will an exlstm[~ solid ~aste rac,ht¥ be ~,~,.d' ~1~.~ c. If yes, gmve name Private sanitation cart~.r~ . [o~a~on Toun .gf South~id Landfill_ e. If Yes, explain Will the project mvoi~e the disposal b. If ~es, ~hat ~s the anticipated s~te hfe~____ N/A ,,~ ar. 18. Will project use herbicmdes or pestmc~de~' 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use~ :~ht~ ['JNo If yes , indicate type(s] Domestic e~ecCr~c service (~a[) 23. Total anticipated water usage per day ~2~000 4alh)ns da~ 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding/ :2~es If Yes, explain L:dNo ~.~25. ApprovJl'$ Required: C SubmiHal Date CK~, Town, :.91~:a:-~ Board ~', Town, ~.'~'lfo~,,~ Planning Board bcq'r~,., "tN,, ~,~, Town Zoning Board of Appeals 6Ky. Count~, Health Departn.ent ~'~es I~JNo Other Local Agencies Other Regional Agencies [~es r~No State Agenoes D~C Federal Agencies ~Yes L~No Town Trustees {]~Yes C. Zoning and Planning Information ~9~g_. ~h~e_ ......... Subd~¥~si~n~Site_~an..Approva[ Var~nc~ ............. Sewage and water Greenport Water District Wetlands Permit Wetlands 1 Does proposed action revolve a planning or zoning dec~s~o~w ~e, L~No If Yes. indicate decision required' [~new/revision of master plan ~]resource management Dian !_~other __ 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the s~te~ Residential A 31 units existinK 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? H-1 General Multiple - Residence District 5 What is the maximum potenbal development of the ~te ~f de~e]oped as permffted b,,' the proposed zoning? 40 units Pending 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses ,n adopted local land use plans? [~¥es ~]No Land use is primarily single-family residential on average lot size of 10.000 sq.ft and commercial (marina) use 9 ff the proposed action is the subdivision of land. ho~ mans lots a,e prooosed~ 2 sections:58.157-acres forever' -~ild a. VVhat is the minimum lot $~ze propoied~24_.959 acres for 40 unit townhouse development fire protect~onF ~]'~ es L~No a. If yes, is the ex,sting road network adequ,,ru l, hat,die t[~c' ddd,t~onal tra~fic~ g~es [~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional informat,on as may be needed to clarify `/ot,r project. Ir there are or ma'~ be an,/ adver<~, avoid them. E. Verification Apphca~t]Spon~ Na,~' JJ~ P~l~.nnin~orp. for Harborview Realty Co. ,. February 11, 1988 Slgnatur~/~('{ ~ ~/~/~//~ [dh, Jean A. Cel~nder, ~r~nt the actionisin the CoastalArca and,,u area shHe ,t, tn, ........ , , ,, c , ~ 7 '~ .-~ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM HARBORVIEW LANDING SUBDIVISION AND CHANGE OF ZONE SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Environmental Assessment From the proposed action to subdivide 24.959 parcel to enable the construction of 40 (EAF) is submitted for acres from a 83.11?-acre clustered townhouse units. A change of zone for the subdivided 24.959 acres from the current "Residential A" to "M-l" would be required to permit construction of the attached townhouse units. The remaining 58.157 acres, representing 70% of the site, would be preserved and dedicated to the Nature tion to be held in trust as The site, approximately Road (Route 25), north of in the Town of Southold. County Tax Map as S~ction owned by Harborview Realty Co. in Hauppauge, New York. forever wild. 83 acres, is located east of Main Tar'pon Drive and north of Southo[d Bay The ~J te is designated on the Su£folk Bl~c;k 5, Lots I2.3 and 12.4 and is with offices at 300 Rabro Drive The property is currently zoned "Residential-A" and contains 31 substandard, non-conforming cottages. The proposed action would remove the cottages and construct a well-designed, upscale, low-density residential development. A rezone to "M-I" is requested on the development portion of the site (24.959 acres) in order to construct the proposed project. The proposed project would conform, in al/ areas, with the M-1 Multiple Residence District except for a variance for the separa%jon between principal 6 the necessity of buildings, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) The clustering of the buildings reduces the impacts on the natural features of the site and reduces the amount of imper- vious surfaces necessary for road and walkways. It also allows the new structures to remain in the area currently occupied by the unconforming cottages. This project would consist of 40 townhouse units which would be clustered in 10 buildings (4 units per building) along the southern half and the point of the eastern most portion of the property. (See attached site plan.) This configuration follows, in essence, that of the existing 31 substandard cottages and, therefore, would reduce the impact to the site's sensitive natural features. Among the amer~ities provided fo[, the development would be 40 boat slips, a dock house for storage and 2 tennis courts, all of which would be available for residents only. A total of 90 parking spaces would be provided, 40 of which would be in two 20-car garages. The additional parking would be provided proxi- mate to each townhouse cluster except for 8 spaces, whicb would be located at the tennis court area. An interior roadway/walkway system would be constructed within the subdivided 24.959 acres. This system would be designed as a private road with access controlled at a gate house at the entrance to the development. Access would be maintained to Main Road, through the dedicated portion of the 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) property, using the existing roadway. This roadway will remain as-is with only minor repairs necessary for safe use (such as pothole repair). In addition to concentrating the development in the area of the property that contains the existing structures, the site plan will maintain the integrity of wetland areas by observing 75-foot setbacks for all components of the development. The existing bulkhead in the eastern portion of the site along Southold Bay (approximately 375 feet) was severely damaged by Hurricane Gloria (Sept'embe~' 27, 1985). The bulkhead will be restored with similar materials ro original condition under an existing Army Corps of Engineers permit. A permit granted by the Town Trustees of October 2], 1985 lapsed and a ~equest for its reissuance has been submitted. A previous application for a subdivision entitled "Sage Property, Section 1," was determined not to have a significant effect on the environment (Negative Declaration) and was granted approval by the Southold Planning Board on March 4, 1985. This application was amended on November 6, 1985 and included, in brief, 1. 2. 3. 4. the following modifications~ sing/e-phased project 23 cluster lots as opposed to 31 lots in two sections removal of non-conforming cottages removal of docks on east side of lagoon and replacement with a floating 18-slip ~ock on the west side of the lagoon and a smaller 5 slip dock Preservation of 32.61 acres of open space. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT~D. } The current plan represents a further improvement in design and protection of environmental features with a significant increase in land area which will be undeveloped and kept forever wild. Although there is a slight increase in the number of units, there are benefits to clustered multi-family units when compared to single-family lots. Water district records and Census figures have shown that condominium units have a reduced number of persons per unit and that water use is substantially less compared to single family homes. Attached homes are energy efficient and land held in common is maintained in a more environmentally responsible and professional manner in terms of landscaping and maintenance. The following information is supplied to further clarify responses to the EAF. The numbered notes refer to the item numbers on the EAF. (Item Al2) Unique Land Forms In addition to the 1.566~ acre island at Conkling Point, which will be kept forever wild, an additional 56.591 acres would remain undeveloped. This acreage includes the 11.551 acres of underwater land. 9 (Item B13 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D. / Sewage The project site which is outside Hydrogeologic Zone is located in Hydrogeologic Zone IV, of the deep recharge area of III as defined in the "208 study." According to Suffolk County Health Department regula- tions, a conventienal sub-surface sewage disposal system may be approved when the equivalent wastewater flow of 600 gallons per day per acre in Zone IV is not exceeded as long as there is a public water supply available and the soils and groundwater condi- tions are conducive to tile proper operation of a sub-surface sewage disposal system. At maximum, each cluster of the proposed devel~opment would have a des~.gn flow requirement of 1,200 gallons per day (4 units x 300 gallons per unit). For the total 10 clusters, gallons/day which per day equivalent 600 gpd). design flow would equal 12,000 is well within the 14,975 gallon wastewater f]ow (24.959 acres x 10 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CONT'D.) Test hole data collected in 1985 indicated that soils on-site are capable of supporting sub-surface septic tanks and cesspools. The proposed action would eliminate the present ol~ sub-surface systems which service the existing cottages. (Item B23) Water Use Public water by the Greenport Water District is available on-site via an existing water main along Sage Road. New connections will be provided to the water main for each of the new residences. Suffi- cient supply of potable water is available to service this development, which is projected to have an maximum water use of 12,000 gallons per day for the summer months. In accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 617 (State Environmental Quality Review Act Regulations), the applicant sets forth as indicated by the insignificant effects noted above, that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the environment and should be issued a Notice of Non-Significance (Negative Declaration) by the Lead Agency. 11 L2 TOWN BOARD, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the Matter of the Petition of HARBORVIEW REALTY CO. to the Town Board of the Town of Southold. TO: NOTICE YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undcrsi§ned to petition the Town Board of the Town of Southold to request a change of zone on the premises hereinafter described. 2. That the property which is the subject of the Petition is located adjacent to your property and is des- cribed as follows: SuffoLk County tax map, distziet 1000, section 53, block 5, p/o lot 12.3 Icc~monl¥ k_now~ as the "Sa~" prope~y). Subject: ~rcel Ls bounded by adjacent parcels as inc~cated: W~ST: Hc~a~d Ze. hner (Young's Ma~J~'~)~ NO~T~: g~)sillioo Constrgc+-~on Com?a.ny; NOR1/~q~T: Anesthesia Group P.C. and William J. Schneider; SC(/i~I: Shelter Island Sound. 3. That the property which is the subject of such Petition is located in the following zoning district: "A" Residential - Agricultural Zoning Use District 4. That by such Petition, the undersigned will request that the above-described property be placed in the following zone district classification: M-1 General Multiple Residence District . The request is limited to the easterly area where the existing cottages are located. $. That within five days from the date hereof, a written Petition requesting the relief specified above will be Hied in the Southold Town Clerk's Office at Main Road, Southold, New York and you may then and there examine the same during regular office hours. 6. That before the relief sought may be granted, a public hearing must be held on the matter by the Town Board; that a notice of such hearing must be published at least ten days prior to the date of such hearing in the Suffolk Times and in the Long island Traveler-Mattituck Watchman, newspapers published in the Town of Southold and designated for the publication of such notices; that you or your representative have the right to ap- pear and be heard at such hearing. Dated: February 16, 1988 Harborview Realty Co.' Petitioner Post Office Address: Hauppau~e, New York 117~7 C PROOF OF' %.1.qlLh~, C~P ~_OTIcI~ ADDRESS SEE ATTACHED LIST P 437 901 465 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Anes t h e~_s_i_a__Qa~Q]~_~__ P c c/o Bertram S_._ Ho~lder 356 Clinton Avenue rOoklyn, NY STATE OF NEW YORK: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK: SS.: p 412 733 618 RECE. tPT FOR cERTIFiED MAIL Michael A. 1~4 ~sland View D~ri_TM Green~rt ~ Cheryl Godet ,resJdin~oat 1102 Norba. y Stree.t, Franklin Sguar. e, New York 11010 . ~ he;nD duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 16 th · day of Febru. ary , ] 9 ~L, deponent mailed a [ruc copy of the Notice set forth on t-~ reverse side hereof, directed to each of the ahoy .-named persons at the addresses se: opgos[:e their respective names; that the addresses set oppos;~e the names of said persons are the addFesses of said persons as shown on the cur- J~n~ assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were r,~a/led a~ ~he United States Post Office a: (~e~isteFed) mail. Sworn to me this 1Rth da¥of Feh'r~s~--y_,19 88 . Notary Pub[i~ · ; that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) ? C~ERYL GODET LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS Lynn F. Sciora, 407 River Avenue, Beaver, PA 15009 Raymond Ciacia, Greenport, NY 11944 John E. Rempe, 4310 Bayshore Road, Greenport, NY 11944 George L. Penny, Inc., c/o George L. Penny IV, Main Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Bros. Corazzini, 56240 Main Road, Greenport, NY 11944 Theresa Casamisina, 14 Julia Lane, East Northport, NY 11731 Charles Krepp, 205-01 34th Avenue, Bayside, NY 11361 Frank Carlucci, 157-48 24th Avenue, Whitestone, NY 11357 Michael A. Koscis, 14 Island View Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 Donald F. Jones, 97 Noble Street, Brooklyn, NY 11222 Ethel Dudley, P.O. Box 636, Greenport, NY 11944 Richard Burkhardt, 321 West 24th Street, New York, NY 10011 Edwin M. Latson, 1425 Island View Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 William J. Schneider, 20 Gilbert Street, Yonkers, NY 10701 John H. Mulholland, 71 Old Zoar Road, Monroe, Conn. 06468 Derek Morcombe, 725 Island View Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 Madeline Keufner & Katherine Jarres, 64-71 74th Avenue, Glendale, NY 11385 Murray & Selma Jacobs, 5 Diamond Drive, Plainview, NY 11803 Joseph W. Suda, P.O. Box 65, Greenport, NY 11944 Joseph Knizak, 5 Perigee Drive, Stony Brook, NY 11790 William F. Killan, P.O. Box 186, Greenport, NY 11944 Harold Reese, 855 Sunrise Highway, Lynbrook, NY 11563 Thomas F. & Joan F. Gleason, 5 Furwood Drive, East Northport, NY 11731 Seymour & Adelaide Brittman, 14 Leland Street, East Northport, NY 11731 Willard H. & Claire A. Barry, 166 Roxbury Road, Garden City, NY 11530 Robert & Linda Bracken, 32 Linchfield Road, Port Washington, NY 11050 Frank A. Santamaria, 220 Colonial Road, North Babylon, NY 11703 Frank M. & Ingeborg L. Flynn, P.O. Box 144, Southold, NY 11971 Charlotte Weisman, Tarpon Drive, Southold, NY 11971 Robert H. Chilton, Beachwood Lane, Southold, NY 11971 Southold Shores Assoc., Inc., P.O. Box 263, Southold, NY 11971 Andrew F. & Carole Cassidy & Others, 1815 Albertson Lane, Greenport, NY 11944 James Melrose, 41 Robinson Road, Greenport, NY 11944 James Posillico, 31 Tennyson Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590 Posillico Construction Company, Inc., 31 Tennyson Avenue, Westbury, NY 11590 Mary Barsczewski, c/o Stanley Bladzinski, Southold, NY 11971 Anesthesia Group P.C., c/o Bertram S. Holder M.D., 356 Clinton Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11238 Joseph A. LaColla, c/o Mill Creek Liquors, Southold, NY 11971 Howard Zehner, P.O. Box 250, Greenport, NY 11944 . / ~ / ~_ ,. ' .. ~ - .. ,_. ......... . . __ ____ ~~=~ ~.~-~ , / ~ I~ ,o.~ ~ ~ ~'%'~ ~m~9om~m~=<-~z=- ~ ~ ~Zz~=~ - o / -'-'-"'"'"'"'-'-'-"':' ' -"" " ' " / / ~ ........ ,,' ~;~ ~ ' . , - , '~. .~ ~"~. ~., , , < ~ ~ ¢ ~,- .I '~ ~,;~.,,., ~,,,,,' , ..~. . ~ , 'Z ~,8- : · m 0 ~ ~ ~ -: , , , , ~.~ ..,., t ..~ ~ o m m > ...... ' · ' ' ~ 3x 0 h ~ . ,~~ . ,~,~ ~ . ~ ,, 0 i~.~'~~ ' o;];J -- · " ~ .- il' z . I'