HomeMy WebLinkAboutSebastian's Cove (2)HENRY P. SMITH, President
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres.
PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD
ALBERT KRUPSK[, JR.
ELLEN M. LARSEN
BOARD OF TO~'N TllUSTEE$
TOWN OF $OUTItOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
This is to certify that I, Ilene Pfifferling, Clerk to the Board of Town Trustees
in said County of Suffolk, have compared the foregoing copies of correspondence
from the Trustee Office file for Sebastian's Cove with the originals now on file
in this office, and that the same is a correct and true transcript of such
original correspondence and the whole thereof.
October 7, 1987
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
This is to certify that I, Ilene Pfifferling, Clerk to the
Board of Trustees in said County of Suffolk, have compared
the foregoing copies of correspondence from the Trustee
Office file for Sebastian's Cove with the originals now on
file in this office, and that the same is a correct and
true transcrip of such original correspondence and the
whole thereof.
January 30, 1986
Ilene Pfiffe~i~/ Clerk
TWIN FORK SIDING CO.
July 8, 1985
Southold Town Hall
Town Trustees
Main Road,
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Sebastian's Cove
Gentlemen:
In our permit of April 22, 1985, we requested to
put dredge spoil on island and wet lands area.
At this time, you recommended that we file an
environmental impact statement. My question is: if we
put the dredge spoil on up land areas by diking, will
you wave a draft environmental impact statement to an
environment assesment? Along with this change, we are
also re-assesing the amount of dredge spoil yardage.
ehrely' ~ ~
e~ ~p~p~r r~
TWIN FORK SIDING CO.
July 8, 1985
Southold Town ~11
Town Trustees
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Re: Sebastian's Cove
Gentlemen:
In our permit of April 22, 1985, we requested to
put dredge spoil on island and wet lands area.
At this time, you recommended that we file an
environmental impact statement. My question is: if we
put the dredge spoil on up land areas by diking, will
you wave a draft environmental impact statement to an
environment assesment? Along with this change, we are
also re-assesing the amount of dredge spoil yardage.
BOARD OF TO~'N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
SIGNIFICANT DECLARATION
NOTICE OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Dated: May 29, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of the New York State Code,
Rules and Regulations, and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code,
'the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency, does hereby determine
that the action described below is a Type I action and is likely
to have a significant effect on the Environment.
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION:
Application of Twin Fork Fence & Siding Company and Sebastian's
Cove, Ltd. to redredge existing channel to gain access to the
Federal Channel in Mattituck Creek. Approximately 6,000 cu. yds.
of dredged spoil is to be deposited on a diked area, using a
hydraulic dredge. Property is located on the North side of Mill
Road, East of Mattituck channel, Mattituck.
Further information can be obtained by contacting Mr. Henry
P. Smith, President, Board of Town Trustees, Southold Town Hall,
Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 or by calling 765-1892.
Copies to: Charles T. Hamilton, D.E.C. Stony Brook/
Commissioner Williams, D.E.C., Albanyj
Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers~/
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council ~
Southold Town Building Department~
Stephen Perricone, Pres. Twin Fork Fence & Siding~'
Town Clerk's Bulletin B6ard/
Trustees/
File~
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
May 29, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mr. Stephen J. Perricone, President
Twin Fork Fence & Siding Company
P. O. Box 41
North Road
Mattituck, New York 11952
RE: Wetland Application No. 266
Dear Mr. Perricone:
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the
Environmental Conservation Law, Part 617 of Title 6 of
the New York State Code, the Southold Town Trustees, as
lead agency, does hereby determine that the action
proposed is a Type I action and is likely to have a
significant effect on the environment and further request
that you prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
all in accordance with said law, rules and code.
Very truly yours,
Board of Town Trustees
Henry P. Smith, President
Ilene Pfi ry
cc: Trustees
File
BOARD OF TO~N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
May 24, 1985
Mr. Stephen J. Perricone, President
Twin Fork Fence & Siding Company
P. O. Box 41
North Road
Mattituck, New York 11952
Re: Wetland Application No. 266
Dear Mr. Perricone:
The Trustees would appreciate your assistance in
preventing run off into the creek, by placing hay bailes
along the bulkhead until the necessary permits are
secured and the intertidal area is stabilized.
Your cooperation regarding this matter will be
greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~mith, President
Board of Town Trustees
HPS:ip
cc: Trustees
File
COMMUNICATION - MAY 29, 1985
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Lead agency coordination for Sebastions Cove, LTD.
A Long Environmental Assessment Form is Attached.
Spoke to Steven Mars - Army Core of Engineers, 26 Federal Plaza
New York 10278-0090
212-264-3912
Mr. Mars Advised that they are sending back the application
for completeness. They will hold the application if the Town
asks for an EIS.
Would like to see alternatives for disposal on the fill.
Suggests a reduction in the dredging to prevent slumping.
Requested a letter from May 6, 1985 where the Board Declared
the Lead on the application.
Asked to be advised of the status. Copy of the Determination
also.
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
May 6, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mr. Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Permit Administrator
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Regulatory Affairs Unit
Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Re: Sebastions Cove, LTD. - 10-85-0287
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
Please be advised that the Board of Trustees have
declared lead agency on the project above referenced by
resolution adopted on May 1, 1985 in accordance with
Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR)
of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR, Part 617.
Very truly yours,
Henry P. Smith, President
Board of Town Trustees
Ilene Pfifferling
Secretary to Board
cc: Trustees
File
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Regulatory Affairs Unit
Bldg. 40, SUNY--Room 219
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Henry G. Williams
(516) 751-7900 Commissioner
April 26, 1985
Henry P. Smith, President
Southold Board of Trustees
P.O. Box 728
Southold, NY 11971
RE: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE
Sebastions Cove, LTD., 10-85-0287
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter responds to your communication of March 28, 1985, regarding lead
agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law
and 6NYCRR, Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this
project:
DEC Permits (if any)
10-85-0287, Tidal Wetlands, Protection of Waters, Water Quality
DEC Contact Person
Charles T. Hamilton
SE~R Classification
Unlisted
DEC Position
DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this
action.
Comments
I have enclosed a copy of the Long Form Environmental Assessment form.
If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this
office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under
Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or
discussion.
yours, / __
Very
truly
Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Permit Administrator
CTH:co's
EAF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine,
in an orderly manner, whether a project or action is likely to be sig-
nificant. The question of whether an action is significant is not al-
ways easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that
are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who
will need to determine significance will range from those with little
or no formal knowledge of the environment to those who are technically
expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge
in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affect-
ing the question of significance.
The EAF is intended to provide a method whereby the preparer can
be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehen-
sive in nature, and yet flexible to allow the introduction of informa-
tion to fit a project or action.
FAF CO}~ONENTS: The EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part I:
Provides objective data and information about a given
project and its site. By identifying basic project data,
it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place
in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2:
This phase of the evaluation focuses on identifying the
range of possible impacts that may occur from a project
or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact
is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether
it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identi-
fies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3:
Only if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-
large~ then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important to the municipality in which
the project is located.
Determination of Significance
If you find that one (or more) impact is both large and its con-
sequence is important, then the project is likely to be significant,
and a draft environmental impact statement should be prepared.
Scoping
If a draft ElS is needed, the Environmental Assessment Form will
be a valuable tool in determining the scope of the issues to be covered
by the draft EIS. ~
APPENOIX A
EAF
ENVIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I
Project Information
NOTICE: This document is desk?ned to assist in determining whether'the action proposed may have a significant
effect on the environ~nt. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and n~y be subject to further verification and Public review. Provide
any additional lnforntation you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and.3.
it is expected :nat como)etlon of the FAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not
involve new studies, research or investtqation. If information reQulrina such additional work is unavat~ble,
so indicate and specify each instance.
AOORESS AND NAHE OF APPLICANT~t {Street)
~, ~A MaF~, ~ r, (P.O.) (State) (Zip)
~m~)
/~ ~y~M ~, BU~NESS PHONE: ~/~ ~ ~' ~F~
(Street)
~.0. ) (State) (zip)
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT' (Briefly describe type of groJect or action)
(PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTIBN - Indicate N.A. tf not applicable)
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
(Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undevelooed areas)
General character of the land: Generally uniform slope ~/ Generally uneven and rolline or irreoular
2. P~sent land use: ~roan , Industrial , C~rcial , Subu~an / , Rural . F~rest
3. Total acreage of oroJect a~a: /~ acres.
Aooroxi~te acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion
~ead~ or Brushland ~acres ~ acres ~later Surface Area ~acres ~ ac~es
Forested .~ acres ~acres Unveget~ted (~ck,
earth or fill) ~ acres ~ acres
~oads, bui)dinqs
!4, 2~ Or F.C.L.) ~ acres ~ acres
Ather (indicate tyne) ~ acres 0 acres
6. Approximate percentage of proposed nroject site with slooes: O-lO~ /~ 1n-15) -~%; 15~ Or
greater ~-
7. Is project contiquous to, or contain a buildin0 or site listed on the National Register of Historic
Places? Yes
8. What is the depth to the water table? ~-/~feet
9. Do hunting or fishi~ opportunities presently exist in the project area? ¥/~Yes NO
10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or
endangered - Yes ~ ]o, according to - Identify each species
ll. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological
for~ations - Yes ~ No. (Describe
12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation
area ~ Yes / No.
13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to t~e coca, unity?
._~Yes ~ NO
14. Streams within or contiguous to prOject area:
a. Name of stream and name of river to whic'h it is tributary ,~'~'~7-/~ff)
15. Lakes, Ponds, ~etland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. ~(ame '/~ ~ ; b. Size (in acres)
16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g.
single family residential, R-g) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). ~(Y~-~
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor~. ]~9~ acres.
b. Project acreage developed: / . acres initially: ~ acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped .~
d. Length of project, in miles: ~,R, (if appropriate)
e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot
age ~% ; developed acreage ~4'~ .
f. Nunt)er of off-street oarking spaces exi~tinn ~.a, ; proposed
g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour .~ (upon completion of project)
h. If residential: Number and type of housing ~nits:
~ne Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initial
Ultimate 1A.~..,~ ~,~ ~
i. if' ~r~entation
'e~gh~orhood-C~ty-Regional Estimated Emoloyment
Comercial ~,~',
Industrial ~, ~ ¢ __ ~ _
j. Total ne~qht of tallest nronosed structure __-3~ _.¢eet.
2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site -
tons
cubic yards.
3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers~ will be far,Dyed from site - ~,i~ acres
a. will any mature forest (over lOP years old) or other locally-important vegetation be re,norad
proiect? Yes w~'No
5. Are them any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? ~Yes
6. If single phase ~roject: Anticipated period of construction _~nths, (includin9 demo litinnj.
?. '~ mul*i-nh~sed oroject: a. Total number of phases anticipated No.
l~,A, b. Anticioated date of con~nencement phase i month year (including
demoli rich)
c. Approximate completion date final phase month .__year.
d. Is phase I financially dependent on subseauent chases? Yes
8. Will blasting occur during construction? .Yes ~No
9. Numoer of jobs generated: d~ring construction ~- ; after project is complete ~ ..
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ --~
ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes ~No. If yes, explain:
12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes
b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.)
c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged
13 Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increaseO or
decreased by prooosal? ~Yes ~ No.
14 Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood Plain? V~'Yes No
!5. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? -- Yes ~.No
b. If yes, wilt an existing solid waste disno~al facility be used? Yes No
c. If yes, give name: : location
O. t)ill any wastes not go into a sewage disoosa) system or ~nto a sanitary land fill?
16. Will prnject use herbicides or pesticides? Yes
17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Der day)? . Yes ~'.NO
lB. Will oroject produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? .,_Yes / NO
19. ~ill project result ~n an increase in energy use? Yes ~'No. If yes, indicate typels) __
2D. If water SUDOly is from wells indicate pu~ping capacity '~, m, gals/m~nute.
21. Total anticinated water usage per day ~ ~als/dav.
22. Zon~ng~ a. ~lhat ~s dominant zoning classification of s~te?
b. Current specific zoning classification of site /~:~'~/-~ /~J~',~/~---
26.
b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? ___
Approval Required
(Yes, No) (Type)
Yes ~/~ NO
Submittal Approval
(Date) (Date)
Ctty~ Village ~
Ctty,~, Village Planning Board
· City, Town, Zoning Board
City, County Heal th Department
Other local agencies
Other regional agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies ~y
INFORMATIONAL DETAILS
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any
adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be
taken to.mitigate or avotd~h~
The proposed project restores a navigable channel which was
dredged under an Army Corps of Engineers permit originally issued
in 1948 and still shown on USCG charts as late as 1969. The extent
of proposed dredging is the same as before. No enlargement of the
channel is requested.
The project will not cause any permanent environmental damage.
Dredge spoil will be placed on top of previously deposited dredge
spoil. This area now supports fresh water vegetation, (cedars,
poison ivy, other shrubs and upland grasses). The extent of the
existing dredge spoil area will not be increased. Its elevation
will increase by 3 to 4 feet. It can be reasonably expected that
the leaching of the new spoil will occur by natural precipitation
over 2 to 5 years and upland types of vegetation will re-establish
themselves during this time. The topography is flat and negligible
erosion is to be expected.
The wetland surrounding the dredge spoil area will suffer no
damage from the dredging operation since only temporary laying of
pipe or passage of a vehicle over mats will occur. If done in
winter, as planned, there will not even be a temporary visual
degradation.
The bottom of the newly dredged channel will be suitable for
marine life immediately and is likely to be more fruitful than the
present organic muck and silt which have filled the original
channel.
COMMUNICATION - MAY 29, 1985
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Lead agency coordination for Sebastions Cove, LTD.
A Long Environmental Assessment Form is Attached.
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
May 6, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mr. Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Permit Administrator
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Regulatory Affairs Unit
Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Re: Sebastions Cove, LTD. 10-85-0287
Dear Mr. Hamilton:
Please be advised that the Board of Trustees have
declared lead agency on the project above referenced by
resolution adopted on May 1, 1985 in accordance with
Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review - SEQR)
of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6NYCRR, Part 617.
Very truly yours,
Henry P. Smith, President
Board of Town Trustees
Ilene Pfifferling
Secretary to Board
cc: Trustees
File
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Regulatory Affairs Unit
Bldg. 40, 8UNY--Room 219
Stony Brook, NY 11794
(516) 751-7900
Henry G. Williams
Commissioner
April 26, 1985
Henry P. Smith, President
Southold Board of Trustees
P.O. Box 728
Southold, NY 11971
RE: LF~ AGENCY COORDINATION RESPONSE
Sebastions Cove, LTD., 10-85-0287
Dear Mr. Smith:
This letter responds to your communication of March 28, 1985, regarding lead
agency coordination for the above-noted project, under Article 8 (State
Environmental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law
and 6NYCRR, Part 617. The Department has the following interest in this
project:
DEC Permits (if any)
10-85-0287, Tidal Wetlands, Protection of Waters, Water Quality
DEC Contact Person
Charles T. Hamilton
SEQR Classification
Unlisted
DEC Position
DEC has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this
action.
Co~ents
I have enclosed a copy of the Long Form Environmental Assessment form.
If you do not concur with the DEC position indicated above, please contact this
office to resolve designation of lead agency within the time allowable under
Part 617. Please feel free to contact this office for further information or
discussion.
yours, / ~
Very
truly
Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Permit Administrator
CTH:co's
EAF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Pu~rpose: The EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, '
in an orderly manner, whether a project or action is likely to be sig-
nificant. The question of whether an action is significant is not al-
ways easy to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that
are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who
will need to determine significance will range from those with little
or no formal knowledge of the environment to those who are technically
expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge
in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affect-
ing the question of significance.
The EAF is intended to provide a method whereby the preparer can
be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehen-
sive in nature, and yet flexible to allow the introduction of informa-
tion to fit a project or action.
EAF CO}~ONENTS: The EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1:
Provides objective data and information about a given
project and its site. By identifying basic project data,
it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place
in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2:
This phase of the evaluation focuses on identifying the
range of possible impacts that may occur from a project
or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact
is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether
it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identi-
fies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3:
Only if any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-
large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important to the municipality in which
the project is located.
Determination of Significance
If you find that one (or more) impact is both large and its con-
sequence is important, then the project is likely to be significant,
and a draft environmental impact statement should be prepared.
Scopin8
If a draft EIS is needed, the Environmental Assessment Form will
be a valuable tool in determining the scope of the issues to be covered
by the draft EIS. ~."~
APPENDIX A
EAF
ENVIRO;IHENTAL ASS£SSHENT - PART !
Project Information
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether'the action proposed may have a significant
effect on the envlro~nt. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these ouestions will be considered
as part of the application for approval and ~y be subject to further verification and public review. Provide
any additional ~nforn~tion you believe will be needed to comoletP PARTS 2 and.3.
it la expected :nat comoletion of the FAF will be dependent on tnfomation currently available and will not
involve new studies, research or invesctoation. If information requirino SUCb additional work is unavailable,
so indicate and specify each instance. '
NAME OF PROJECT:
NAME AND ADDRESS OF
ADORESS AND NAME OF APPLICANT:).' (Street)
( Nam )
/~ ~Y~ D~. BU~NCSS PHONE: ~/~
(street)
[P.O.) (State) (Zip)
DESCRIPTIOf( OF PROJECT' (Briefly describe type of project or action) /~'~'z~--~'
(PLEASE COMPLETE EACH qUESTI(l~q - Indicate N.A. if not applicable)
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
(Physical setting of overall project, both develoned and undevelooed areas)
I. General character of the land: Generally uniform slope I/' Generally uneven and rollino or irregular
2. Present land use: ~roan__, Industrial , Comtercial . , Suburban l/e., Rural _, Forest
3. Total acreage of oroject area: /~ acres.
Aoproxtmate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion
Peadow or Brushland _,~l~acres ~, acres l.)ater Surface Area _~,__acres ~.ac~es
Forested ~ acres ~acres Unvegetated (rock,
earth or fill) ~ acres ~ acres
Aaricu)tural ~ acres o acres
~oads, buildinos
~letland (Freshwater or and other paved
Tidal as net Articles surfaces ~:e acres o acees
~4, ,:5 or F.C.L.) ~ acres (~ acres
~t~er (indicate tyne) ~ acres 0 ~cres
6. Approximate percentaoe of proposed oroject site with sloues: 0-10~ /~; ln-l? -~; 15Z or
greater ~ %.
?. Is project contiquous to, or contain a buildino or site listed on the National Reglster of HlStOrlC
Places? Yes
8. What is the depth to the water table? ~./~ feet
9. Do hunting or f~shjn~ opportunities presently exist in the project area? I/~Yes No
1D. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or
endangered - Yes ~ :lo, according te - Identify each species
II. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological
formations - Yes v~' No. (Describe )
12. Is the project site presently used by the con~nunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation
area - Yes ~ NO.
13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the contnunity?
Yes ~ NO
14. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary ~'~'~1~7~/~ ~MT)'~YZ ! ~
15. Lakes, Ponds,?etlaQd areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. I4ame '/~ ~ ; b. Size (in acres) ~
16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 nile radius of the project (e.g.
single family residential, R-2) and the scale of Uevelopment (e.g. 2 story). ~7'~yQYV~ ~ ~Y~ ? ~g(~Yv7
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropr)ate}
a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor~. /Y'i/ acres.
b. Project acreage develooed: / acres initially; ~ acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped .~
d. Length of project, in miles: ~,~, (if appropriate)
e. If pro~ect Is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot-
age ~/~ ; developed acreage /~'~y'~ .
f. Muter of off-strut oarking soaces exi~tin~ ~,~,
g. Maximum veh~cu)ar tries generated per hour ~
h. If residential: Number and type of housing.units:
Initial
(upon completion of project)
~ne Family Two Family Multiple Family
If' Orientation
e~ghbornood-Cqty-Peg~onal Estimated Ernoloyment
Con~nercla! ~,~ ~
In~ustr:al ~, ~,' _ ~
Condominium
2. HOW much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - tons
~ cubic yaros.
3. How many acres of veqetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - y~,~ acres.
4. Wi1) any mature forest (over 190 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed ky tn~s
project? Yes ~,~No
5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction~ ~Yes 9o
6. If single onase project: Anticipated period of construction ~ months, (including demolit~onj.
7. ? mul'i--hased oroJect~ a. Total number of phases anticipated No.
~,A, b. Anticipated date of con~nencement phase i month year ~includ~ng
demolition)
c. Aoproximate completion date final phase mOnth . year.
d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subseouent ohases? Yes No
8. Will blasting ~ccur during construction? __Yes ~"No
9. Number of jO~S generated: dyring construction ~, ; after project is complete ~ .
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ . ..~
ll. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes ~No. If yes, explain:
12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes
b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.)
c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged
13 Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increase~ or
decreased by proposal? Yes ~ NO.
14 Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? )/"Yes No
!5. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? Yes ___NO
c. If yes, give name: t location
p. dill any wastes not go Into a sewage disoosal system or ~nto a sanitary landfill? Yes
16. Will Drnject use herbicides or pesticides? __Yes
17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour oer day)? Yes
18. will project produce ooerating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? __Yes ~ NO
19. u~ll project result in an increase ~n energy use? __Yes V~'No. if yes, indicate typels} __
20. If water SUODly is from wells indicate pumoing capacity "W, ~* gals/minute.
21. Total anticipated water usage per day ~:) ~als~dav.
b. Current soecific zoning classification of site
d. If no, indicate desired
26.
a, Is an) Federal permit required? ~¥es No
b. Does pro3ect involve State or Federal funding or f~nanc~ng?
c. Local and Regional aoorova)s:
ApprOval Required
(Yes, NO) (Type}
Submittal ApprovaI
(Date) {Date)
City Village ~
City,~, Village Planning Board
City, Town, Zoning Board
City, County Health Department
Other local agencies
Other regional agencies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies ~g~¥
INFORMATIONAL DETAILS
Attach any additional inforr~tion as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may De any
adverse impacts associated with the proposal, ~lease discuss such impacts and the measures wnich can be
taken to,mitigate or avoid ~h~
TITLE: ~y, ~ ~/~N ~ ~ ,. ~X~
REPRESENTING: ~ ~ ~ ~P~/ ~A~ ~ I~ ~1 ~Z 5 ) ~
DATE: ~ /~, /~ ~--
The proposed project restores a navigable channel which was
dredged under an Army Corps of Engineers permit originally issued
in 1948 and still shown on USCG charts as la~e as !969. The extent
of proposed dredging is the same as before. No enlargement of the
channel is requested.
The project will not cause any permanent environmental damage.
Dredge spoil will be placed on top of previously deposited dredge
spoil. This area now supports fresh water vegetation, (cedars,
poison ivy, other shrubs and upland grasses). The extent of the
existing dredge spoil area will not be increased. Its elevation
will increase by 3 to 4 feet. It can be reasonably expected that
the leaching of the new spoil will occur by natural precipitation
over 2 to 5 years and upland types of vegetation will re-establish
themselves during this time. The topography is flat and negligible
erosion is to be expected.
The wetland surrounding the dredge spoil area will suffer no
damage from the dredging operation since only temporary laying
pipe or passage of a vehicle over mats will occur. If done in
winter, as planned, there will not even be a temporary visual
degradation.
of
The bottom of the newly dredged channel will be suitable for
marine life immediately and is likely to be more fruitful than
present organic muck and silt which have filled the original
channel.
the
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF $OUTHOLD
Town Hall, $3095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
APPLICATION I$ HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
APPLICATION NO. ~t¢~:~ DATE OF APPLICATION April 22, 1985
Co- TW~ Fork Fence & Siding Co., and
IDENTITY OF APPLICANT Sebastian's Cove, Ltd. (516)298-5111 PHONE NO
ADDR£SS OF APPLICANT P.O. BOX 41, North Road
Mattituck, New York 11952
TAX MAP NO. 106.--4--1 and 100-3-11.4 '~
(516)298-5111
.... PHONE NO.___
PERMIT REQUESTED TO Redredge existing channel to ~ain access to Federal
channel in Mattituck Creek.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED North side of Hill Road.,
East of Mattituck Channel.
HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION
CREE~, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Sebastian's Gutter
SIZE OF PROPOSED WOR~
LENGTH 800'
WIDTH 30' Channel and a 75' x 75' basin in front of pier.
HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER not applicable
YARDS TO SE EXCAVATED~P__prox 6000 CU. yds. of dredge spoil.
YARDS TO SE FILuEDDredge spoil to be deposited on top of existing spoil.
DEPTH AT LOW TIDE 2' at north end and +.5' at south end.
AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE 5I
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 800~ FT.
DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS
IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? Private.
AREA ZONING Residential-agricultural
IN THE AREA N/A FT.
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED Hydraulic
~_g_e_p_~p_~_ into diked area made out of existing old spoil.
INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY recreational
DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE Commercial
3~ard with bulkheaded pier, boathouse and marine railway, all still
there.
AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT
STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER
ANY PERHITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED DY A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCy_U2~2_~_m~_ Corps of Engineers, Permit #800.6 approved lS Feb. 1948.
~_pected and certified completed as of 12 Sept. 1956. USCG Chart as late
as 1969 shows the channel as "dredged to 6'". No record of any revocati~s
DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE
PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF
THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY The dreOqed
channel
will
re-establish
itself
as ordinary marine bottom promptly. The dredge spoil area will be incr~s~
in elevation by 3 to 4 ft. and will regain upland vegetation in 2 to 5
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE
APPLICANT. All property affected by this work is owned by the co-applicant~
~hen J. Perricone is authorized to act on behalf of the owners.
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor)
1. Apphcant~sponsor ~ 2. Project Name
Twin Fork Fence and Sidinq Co. I Sebastian's Cove
3. Project location: . TOW~
~vtunicipaht¥ Mattituck, New York Southold County Suffolk
[] New [] Expansion [] Mod,ficationlalte,ation Restoration
5. Descr,be project brmily:
Redredge pre-existing channel in Sebastian's Gutter,
of Mattituck Creek.
a tidal
tributary
East side of Mattituck Creek, immediately north of Mill Road (see
attached map).
Initially 12 acres UIt,matelv 2 · 5 acres
[] Yes [] No If No. describe briefly
[] Industrial T~J Commercial [] Agr,culture [] Parkland/open space [] O[her
ResidenbaJ
Residential (vacant) & Parkland to East~ Wetland to Norfih~ Commercial
to West and South.
[] Yes [] No If yes. list agency(s) and perm,t/approvals
US Army Corps of Engineers and NY State Dept. of Environmental
Conservation. (permits, no funding)
~ Yes [] No If yes, I,st Agency name and permk/approval type Original dredging permit issued by
US Army Corps of Engineers, 18 Feb 1948 and certified completed by
inspection on 16 Nov. 1950.
~,~ [] ~o Reissue
Sebastian's Cove, Ltd., G. Toumanoff, Pres.
~pph~n,~p0n~or n~e:T~4in Fork Fence & siding Coo~,S. Perricone, Pres.
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK )SS:
Stephen J. Perricone
BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES
AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS,
AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST
OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE
MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY
THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, THE APPLICANT AGREES TO
HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND
FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY
VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED.
vSIGN~TURE OF~PLICANT -
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
~ NOTkRY ~UBLIC
EX,%MINED
(CHAPTER 32)
APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97)
APPROVED "BOAT.DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER
DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97)
DISAPPROVED "BOATS.DOCKS. WHARVES" PERMIT
CONDITIONS. IF ANY
EXAMINING BODY
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN
COMPUTATION OF FEES
Approved 2/27/85
IV~ r r~rvc t~
/
A
VOL.
RESOLUTION - May 1, 1985
and
Lead agency declaration for Twin Fork Fence
Sebastian's Cove.
RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead
agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act in the matter of the application of Twin Fork Fence &
Siding Co. and Sebastian's Cove, Ltd.
for a Wetland Permit on certain property located
on, the North Side of Mill Road, East of Mattituck Creek,
Mattituck.
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
April 29, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Mr. Frank Cichanowicz, III, Chairman
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Southold Town Hall
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mr. Cichanowicz:
Transmitted herewith is application no. 266 for a
wetland permit submitted by Twin Fork Fence & SeDastian's Cove, LTD.
Please prepare a written report of findings and
recommendations with respect to this application.
Very truly yours,
HENRY P. SMITH, PRESIDENT
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
Secretary to Board
Attachment
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
Aprll 29, 1985
Charles T. Hamilton
Alternate Regional Permit Administrator
N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation
B~ilidng 40, SUNY - Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Dear Nr. Hamilton:
Enclosed is application of Twin Fork Fence &
Sebastian's Cove, Ltd. for a wetland permit.
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
Siding Co., and
This project is unlisted and our initial determination of
non-significance has been made and we wish to coordinate this
action to conform our initial determination in our role as
lead agency.
Nay we have your view on.this matter. Written comments
on this project will be received at this office until May 20,'
1985 We shall interpret your lack of response to mean
there is no objection by your agency.
Very truly yours,
Enclosures
HENRY P. SMITH, PRESIDENT
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
Ilene Pfifferling
Secretary to Board
cc: Commissioner Williams
Southold Town Building Department
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 1197I
Date: April 29, 1985
TELEPHONE
(516) 765-1892
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form
submitted by Co-Applicant Twin Fork Fence & Siding Co., Pres.
Stephen J. Perricone and Sebastian's Cove, Ltd. in connection
with their application for a Wetland Permit to redredge
existing channel to gain access to federal channel in Mattituck
Creek. Removal of Approximately 6000 cu. yds. of spoil and to
be deposited on a previous spoil site. Property located on the
North Side of Mill Road, East of Mattituck Creek, Mat~ituck.
Henry ~. Smith, President
Board of Town Trustees
Posted: April 29, 1985
~.~JECT PLAN
VIEW
5
1 of 6
W~m~4s V~
PROPOSED BULKHEAD
& BOAT RAMP
AT. SEBASTIANS
MtrrlxUCK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SUFFOLK COUtTrY
N~w YOP.~ STATE
DATE: SEPTF. U~ED 1995
FOR: SEBASTIAN COVE
PROPERTY
ASSOCIATION'
BY: INTER-SCIENCE
RESEA_~CH ASSOCIATES
llqC.
EXISTING BULKHEAD
SECTION C - C'
C
Cap
11"x25' Butt
Pile
Countersunk
Easher
EL +2.8'
M.H.W.
Wales
C~
EL 0+0
Shoreline
EL -1.0'
Exlstin~ Depth
Depth of
Penetration
14.0'
10' Horizontal
Pile (16' Back)
x20' Tongue
& Groove Sheathing
Existing Bulkhead
in Disrepair
10' Dia. ~nber
Pile
10' Length
~[pical Bulkhead Section
11' Butt Piling
6"x8" Top & Bottom Wales
3'xlO" Tongue & Grooove
Sheathing
10" Backing ptltn~
10" Horizontal Pilt-l
NOTE:, Approximately 45 Lf. of timber bulkhead
to be replaced in-ldnd/in-place to protect
tidal wetlands veletation per plan vlaw. This
section shows the bulkhead replacement in
that location.
2of6
~sav~w s, ieee
NOT~ New proposed bulkhead to be
installed within 15" of existing
bulkhead, as shown on plall view,
except where otherwise specifically
noted.
Cap
ll"xZS' Butt
Pile
Counters,ink
Eaeher
EL +2.8'
II. KW.
Wales
TYPICAL BULKHEAD
SECTION
Shoreline
EL. -2.7
Depth of
12.3'
10" Horizontal
Pile (16' Back)
3"xlO"x20' Tongue
& Groove Sheatl~tng
Existing Bulkhead
in Disrepair
10" Dia. ~.mber
Pile
10' Length
Typical Bulkhead Section
11' Butt piling
6"x8" Top & Bottom Wales
3'x10' Tongue & Grooove
$heaiht,~g
10" Backing Piling
10" Horizontal Pilt~5
3 of 6 [ en~ sm ~/~.l~ql,m~s/t~otn-DaA~'/sam~nw~
MATTrI't~OX
CROSS-SECTION B - B'
THROUGH RAMP
BULKHEAD
B
Note:
Existina boat ramp is a rate,mum of
18 feet in width (19 feet + maximum).
Proposed boat ramp is a IDinimu~l of
15 feet in width after allowin~ bullhead
replaoement within 18 lnohes of
existin~ b~!ll~head (as 8ho~n above).
Pas ~smo: P./trWhlm/"m~br/old-.d~v/mb4.dq
4of6 ]
SCAI~ 1' . 10'
HU110~an & LAUN~x~i'CI
RAUP IlL'TAIL
AT: S'~BA~TIAH'$ C0'~
TOWN 01P ~011~HOLD
SUFFOLK COUNTY
NEW YORK 9'FA'I'E
DA'rE: Ii,friARY 3, 1998
FEBRUARY 8, 1996 (revised)
FOI~ S~IlA~S'S COV~ PROPI~TY
01~R~ 1380CI~TION
A
C01~TROL JOINT~ AT 12' 0.C.
'~I I I I I I I I I1-1F1[1111][1[~
I I I I I I I I IUUUUUUI_I~
PLAN VIEW OF LAUNCHING RAMP ~
A
5of6
NOTE:The Ilope of ~he launch~,~= ~amp
should Be Between L?.% & 15%.
SECTION A-A'
CROSS-SECTION OF LAUNCHING RAMP
Area to be fradod (1:-~ slope)
& area of relooated
vegetation
Edge of Fis~fed
$0F6
&ppro'~r"-tely 925 s,f. of ex/stiu~ tidal wetlands ra~etetion to be
relooatod,
Proposed transplant area is approx~natoly 3?.5 ~f. (oolon~ed to
Co~11~*fJon l~ed~ Phr~]~ oo~11~-) ~ ~ ~ded ~ ~loca~
~ a~ e~ ~1 ~s ~ ~mo~ f~m boat
~mp a~ ~ phn~ ~d ~p~oe o~ar s~ of
~eobs ~ f~nal ~d~ ~t~ G~t~ comple~d ~t ~
~ ~ p~e for 1:3 s~pe at pe~bw of p~p~ed
Density of Planth~=
Inter tidal marsh - ~parttna altor~iflora, 2 FL on oenteZ',
High marsh - Spa~tina patens, I f~ on oenter,
DLOtioI~LO epicata , ! fi. on
Other speoiss (Lo. Blaok Grass) will be planted at appro~irnAto
density exLsth~ at boat ramp.
Method of T~nsplantin~ - By hand after contractor provides
fradin{
Fertilizer - Not neoes~aFy as substrata wi~ be mo~ed with
tr~nsplantod wetlands ~e~etetiol~
No e~btins tidal wetlands re~etation will be hnpacted as
transplant area Lo Phra~m/tes Communus located above wetlands
$ou.-dl~; Propart~ l~ne, Topography,
lfetismls l~us ~nd TreeHue ~ Per
January ~$, lg9$ Sur~ey By Peoonio
Sur~yore. P.C.
File Name. f:.~r~aphlc~/trunwfwr/oldraw/#b~.dw~
DETAIL OF
wA-Et,ANDS VEGETATION
Al':. ~
PBOpEBTY 0WI~E~S