HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-3692 ...;
F0(�l,
..'
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President tP `= TELEPHONE
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III �`� e# `F (516) 765-1892
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. yvl ti �•���
HENRY P. SMITH
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
J.M.O. Consulting March 29, 1989
Box 361- No. Country Road
Wading River, N.Y. 11792
Re: Application No. 6-88-63-7-30. 1 - Notaro
Dear Mr. Just .
The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees
during their regular meeting held on March 23, 1989 regarding the
above matter:
WHEREAS, J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Frank and Antoinette Notaro
applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the
provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold,
application dated June 26, 1988, and
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations,
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect
to said application on March 23, 1989 at which time all interested
persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation
submitted concerning this application, and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that J.M.O. Consulting ON BEHALF OF Frank and Antoinette
Notaro BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND
ORDINANCE TO:
Construct 4' x 20 ' Catwalk, 8' x 60' Float, 3 ' x 9 ' Ramp, Dredge to
remove approximately 50 cubic yards material from area 17' x 701 in front
of float.
This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if
work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid and permit
issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two
inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon
completion of said project.
Please take notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees:
80. 00 4 ' x 20' catwalk
27. 00 3 ' x 9' ramp
480.00 8 ' x 60 ' float
250. 00 dredging 50 cubic yds.
200 . 00 8 pilings
10. 00 wetland Inspection fee
$1047 .00 Total fees due
Very truly
yours,
�
Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. / /1
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK:jas
cc: Bldg. Dept.
Conservation Advisory Council
file
o� o�
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ~
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President TELEPHONE
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III 0 (516) 765-1892
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
Q'�
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TO: I Board Members
FROM. Frank Kujawski, Jr.
DATE: March 27, 1989
RE: Notaro file
Glen Just called this office to advise us that the Notaro' s will
accept Army Corps' permit authorization for dredging as written,
which includes dredging of 17 ' x 70' area and removal of
approximately 50 cubic yds. of material.
�k V
Page 2. •
Comments regarding the application of Frank & Antoinette Notaro
1. What are the sizes and drafts of the vessels that are to be
accommodated at the proposed dock? Please provide more detail to
justify the request to dredge to 4 ' below MLW.
2. Will any shellfish beds recognized as being important in
Town Creek be disturbed as a result of this activity? If so, to
what extent will the disturbance be, and what plans are there to
mitigate any adverse effects?
3. The proposed vessel is to large for the area.
4. Submission of a mitigated plan of the work to be done as
discussed by the Board with the agent and landowner.
CAPT. W. A. HOLMAN
POST OFFICE BOX 351
SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK 11971
Feb. 12, 1989
T1 SWhom it may Cdncern,
This is to advise we have no
objection to I•ir. Notaro having a small
chanel dredged to allow his boat in to
the dock he proposes to build
Very truly yours",
'ti-"A. nolman
Jean F. Holman
Page 3
RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval
of Wetland Application No. 639 of Frank and Antoinette Notaro
to construct two additions to an exisiting single family dwell-
ing, 8 ' x 20 ' fixed dock, 8 ' x 9 ' ramp, 8 ' x 60 ' float dock
and to dredge a 40 ' x 70 ' area to a depth of 8 ' at MLW. Revised
to install 3 ' x 80 ' railroad tie stairway at the request of
the Southold Town Trustees . The CAC disapproves the dredging
project . The area to be dredge is too deep and too vast .
The CAC suggests the applicant revise the dredging project
to 6 ' deep and smaller area be dredged, about 20 ' x 70 ' would
be sufficient .
Calves Neck Road, Southold.
oS�FFo�r
Oma, OG
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President -4
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President rn ;peri TELEPHONE
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III ® (516) 765.1892
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR.
HENRY P. SMITH
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
TO: Board Members
FROM: Frank Kujawski, Jr.
DATE: March 27, 1989
RE: Notaro file
Glen Just called this office to advise us that the Notaro' s will
accept Army Corps' permit authorization for dredging as written,
which includes dredging of 17 ' x 70 ' area and removal of
approximately 50 cubic yds. of material.
i
SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES
NO:_ez
■
• ' I
■
Issued To nl'fn►KE'1°�� N
OfR'�ate � 9
Address 641- ✓mss NECK 1 . . '-,09l 0t A. AIV
•
THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION
TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE.TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
SOUTHOLD. N.Y. 11971
TEL: 765-1801
RESOLUTION ON NOTARO
ADDED INFORMATION TO FRANK AND ANTOINETTE NOTARO APPLICATION NO
6-88-63-7-30 . 1
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I will tell the Trustees that on Saturday, myself
and Don Dzenkowski went on the Town boat to this area at low tide
on Saturday afternoon to take a look at the location in terms of
navigation and depth and so on. At that time, it was obvious that
the area does drop off sharply and gets very shallow at about 30 or
40 ft. from shore, but at that point it went to about 5 ft. in area
of the end of the dock which agrees with the soundings that have
been submitted on this project. I was surprised to see this
channel really wasn' t much deeper than the area at the end of the
project, seemed to be about 6 ft. in the channel. Right, Don?
Which is fairly shallow and I think a test of the silting that has
taken place there.
HENRY SMITH: I think there is quite a road runoff problem at that
end of the creek and the other end of the creek on Hobart.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I just add that I done alot of thinking on this
application and we've had alot of testimony here and there and back
and forth on minimal dredging that' s going to take place here
whether or not it would have any effect but I then had to think
about my own area, which I 'm more familiar with and the fact that
we, I say we the 250 families on Deep Hole Creek, can' t go in and
out of Deep Hole for an hour before and an hour after low tide
unless you' re dragging a skiff across the opening. There isn' t
much of a channel left, but that doesn' t seem to be a particular
handicap or hardship, and I wonder whether there would be a real
hardship here recognizing the fact that there would only be a
problem, docking the boat and leaving the dock probably only an
hour at low tide in this particular case. I think after that you
:could have sufficient water, it appears here so unless someone
could show me otherwise I 'm failing to see the need myself, this is
a personal thing.
HENRY SMITH: I feel it that we have cut down on the size of the
project. We have asked of Notaro' s about on the size of the
project considerably which they have been very cooperative and have
done I think they are a young family that is moving into Town, they
are not speculators, and they have legitimate use for this
property. They want this to be their home, and I feel they have
cooperated with us in cutting down the size of the project, what
was asked for in the beginning and I have problem with the project
as the application now stands.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Any other comments?
JOHN BEDNOSKI : I more or less go along with what Henry said, I
don't seem to have a problem at all with it.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: I 'm sort of torn between you. I think the good
faith effort was shown to scale down which we all saw, and maybe I
would be considering your thoughts Frank very seriously in future
applications in this area, but being somewhat process oriented I
think it would be justly unfair to tell these people now they
couldn' t have their approval since they worked very hard with us,
but I would very seriously consider your thoughts on this matter.
FRANK KUJAWSKI: Well, I wouldn' t, I'm not suggesting that we don' t
approve the dock and the float and all of that, I still have a
problem with the dredging. I would like to make one other point in
reviewing the file on this, it seems to be some inconsistency in
terms of the amount of dredging. The application is still in front
of us, Glenn, is for an area of 40 x 70?
GLENN JUST: No, 20 x 70.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : 20 x 70, but the Army Corps has approved an
application of 17 x 70.
MRS. NOTARO: It was. . . . .the DEC has a typo when they approved the
- but if you see the actual drawing, the drawing is between 17
and 20 ft. It is the scale.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : The DEC one, yes, that seems to be clear. The
Army Corps Engineer permit has been reduced to 50 cu. yds. and an
area of 17 x 70 . That' s stated in the permit. The question I
have, I 've been out on that size boat, does really an area of 17
ft. by, what is the beam of this vessel?
SOMEONE ? : 13 .
FRANK KUJAWSKI: 13 ft. Do you have any maneuverability?
MRS. NOTARO: You don' t need that much depth for the
keel, . . . .center.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : But you' re going to hit silt on either side.
MRS. NOTARO: But not for the 13 ft. of boat goes in, it' s an even
keeled vessel.
FRANK KUJAWSKI: But for the boat to pull in and to take off, I
don' t think you' re going to have any maneuverability at all.
HENRY SMITH: I think that' s their problem. They feel that they
can work in a channel that 20 ft or 17 ft. wide, I got no problem
with that.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : It' s not exactly a channel, you coming off of a
channel and then you' re taking a 44 ft. boat and you' re attempting
to spin it basically and pull directly in to a 17 ft. wide
HENRY SMITH: But you' re spinning it or turning it in the channel
that was dredged by the County dredge.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : It' s not that wide there.
HENRY SMITH: I know it' s not that wide there, it can be done.
Sailboats can turn almost there own length so there' s no
MR. NOTARO: Can I just mention one thing, I 'm a licensed ship' s
captain, I can pull it in there.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : It' s a good point.
HENRY SMITH: Excellent point.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : The other point is and Chuck Hamilton was along
also from the DEC, which have approved the permit for this, we did
several soundings and found upwards of 4 ft. of silt in this area,
very loose bottom, really no consistency to it at all, and just one
point of view from economics here, I might point out to you here,
you might take a ft. of that silt off to get your permitted depth
but the next tide it will be right there. It will be right there
again. I don' t know if this is going to be real waste of your
money, is what it amounts to. In other words, removing one foot of
silt in a 17 ' wide channel when the tide goes out and the tide
comes in, that bottom is all loose. It' s just going to fill right
back up again. Now, granted your keel may some muck, if you would
like to call it that, sticking to it, but you' re not really going
to be impeded in your navigation in there. For that reason, it
just seems like, I 'm not saying the project wasn' t designed
properly, I 'm saying that I don' t think you' re going to accomplish
what your intended purpose was, with or without this Boards
approval.
GLENN JUST: I think if you look back at some of the testimony by
expert witnesses such as John Costello and Tom Samuels or some of
the other marine contractors, when they do dredge it' s not the
actual muck that they drop ahead of the dredge down to it's the
hard bottom.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Well, you' re not going to be able to accomplish a
one ft. reduction because if you're going down to hard bottom
you've got to go alot farther than 1 ft.
GLENN JUST: The weight of the head of the dredge is dropped
through the muck to the hard bottom and that' s what is going to be
removed.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : That' s exactly my point. So what will you be
removing?
GLENN JUST: The one foot and then the muck is going to settle
right back out, but you've got to get that one ft. depth that you
need.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : If the bucket drops down through 4 ft.
HENRY SMITH: It will level out, Frank.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Of course, it will level out. The first tide in
and the first tide out.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: If they got to put . . . . . .and then it will level
out.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I don' t know, it seems like an exercise in
futility here to accomplish something which I think can be
accomplished without it. Would anyone like to make a motion on
this unless someone else has a comment. There' s no hearing, the
hearing was closed, this is just discussion prior to making of a
motion.
HENRY SMITH: I would like to make a MOTION we approve this permit
as submitted in it' s new
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Point of order here, I don' t think we can approve
it as submitted because the Army Corps of Engineers has the most
severe restrictions on this which is 50 cu. yds. and an area of 17 '
wide x 70 ' long.
GLENN JUST: Someone at the Army Corps of Engineers did their own
scaling. Attached to the Corps of Engineers permit is the same
exact copy of the DEC. I 've signed the original copy of the site
plans and dated it. Somebody at the Army Corps of Engineers has
scaled it out themselves . . . . . . . . .what the DEC approves . . . . . .and
somebody has written over my writing.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I don' t see that.
GLENN JUST: I have the originals in hand, and if you want me to
come up and show you.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : It' s a typed project description that I 'm looking
at.
GLENN JUST: Look at the Army Corps of Engineers what they have and
something is written over it. . . .
FRANK KUJAWSKI : This is not written over. Glenn, I don' t believe
you are correct. Would like to come up and take a look at this?
GLENN JUST: Sure.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : This is not written over- 17 ft, but this is what
we have in the file. This was submitted to us by you.
GLENN JUST: This is the same, I think.
FRANK KUJAWSKI: No, here' s the permit, that' s a picture, this is a
permit.
GLENN JUST: That' s the same thing, this is part of the permit.
There saying the same thing.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : 50 cu.yds. , 17 by 70 ft.
GLENN JUST: What I 'm saying, they made the change there, that' s
where the change has been made. According to the DEC permit that' s
stamped approved is the same exact plan, the same date, the same
signature.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I 'm not disputing that, but what are you going to
do about this? This is the permit.
GLENN JUST: They've made an error.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : They've made an error?
GLENN JUST: Sure. This is the approved plan by the DEC according
to the Corps of Engineers log they cannot issue a permit without a
water quality certificate DEC title wetlands
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I understand that. The problem is we' re asked to
take the applicants word that the permit which is part of the file
is in error and there' s nothing in the permit, they may have
changed this on here because of a scaling problem, the 17 ft. , but
they also reduced the cu. yds. of material from 70 on the DEC
permit to 50 on the Army Corps of Engineers.
GLENN JUST: You have a copy of every single piece of literature
that started back and forth between ourself and every single
regulatory agency. No way that I ever made that change. That was
made by the Corps of Engineers.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I believe that' s correct. In other words, this is
the way the permit stands.
GLENN JUST: All I have is, there' s the original permit.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: What you're saying is that at least under your
understanding the Army Corps doesn' t have any authority to make a
change, but they seemingly have.
GLENN JUST: I 've never seen it done before. You' re the one that
just brought it up, I 've never even noticed it. There' s both the
original permits right there.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I understand that.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: Do you want to approve as this form only?
GLENN JUST: Do you want something in writing from the Corps of
Engineers, I ' ll fax it to you tomorrow, you' ll have it, but I 'm
telling you this is the way it was submitted.
FRANK KUJAWSKI: No, this is the way it was submitted by you to us.
GLENN JUST: No, it' s not. Okay, maybe by me to you. . .I 've never
submitted that to the Corps of Engineers.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : But it was submitted by you to us to become part
of the permanent file, okay. As it stands at this point, it is
more restricting than the application you asked for and more
restricting than the DEC has granted.
HENRY SMITH: How about we make a motion to approve this as it
stands the way it is until he gets a clarification from the Army
Corps of Engineers and until such time it will changed.
GLENN JUST: I don' t know what to say. Here is what was submitted
to the Corps of Engineers, that is it. Same exact signature except
for somebody made the change there and then in turn on the site
plan made it in the narrative.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I don' t think it' s a typo.
GLENN JUST: I can show you the original, it' s in the file. This
is the original that was submitted.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Drawing.
GLENN JUST: This is the one that was stamp approved by the DEC.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : Yes, I can see that. Their obviously contesting
your calculation of cubic yardage.
GLENN JUST: They've changed it, 20 to 17.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : 20 to 17 , and they have changed the 70 to 50 , so
that is a restriction that' s now placed. No more than 50 cu.yds.
can come out of there.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: Whether intentionally or. . .
GLENN JUST: What do you want us to do? I just can' t believe, I 've
never seen
FRANK KUJAWSKI : I just don' t want us to approve something that is
not as restricting as the other agencies we have to coordinate
with. We can' t just take another agencies findings and throw it
out the window and say, "Well, you were to restricting, so we are
going to double the amount of cubic yardage, or we' re going to
increase it from 50 to 70.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: We can approve it subject to this and not to
exceed any revision up to the 20, which we had previously, and then
they can come in with a revision. If it' s simply a typo, the Army
Corps should certainly be able to fax you something.
GLENN JUST: Most definitely it's a typo.
MOVED to approve with the respect to the same area as this Army
Corps permit dated of public notice, 13441-881379L2, and not to
exceed 20 x 70 or 70 cu.yds. if revised, Trustee Bredemeyer, second
by Trustee Bednoski, Vote of the Board: Ayes, Trustee Bredemeyer,
Trustee Smith, Trustee Bednoski, Nay: Trustee Kujawski -
Resolution adopted.
FRANK KUJAWSKI : It was 70 cu. yds. from the DEC. But what that
means if it is not changed then it will be 50 cu. yds.
JOHN BREDEMEYER: Absolutely, in other words, here as stands unless
revised by Army Corps not to exceed what the DEC has. Maybe there
is a legitimate problem, here. Basically we' ll be writing a permit
that coincides with the most recent submittal from Army Corps, if
you can' t get another one then it will be on this, if you get a FAX
sheet over from Army Corps tomorrow
FRANK KUJAWSKI: Could you make a note before the permit goes out
on this, before the permit is issued to make sure the Army Corps is
either left as standing which would be part of the permit or
modified if something does get faxed to us.
Joan Romanowski-- Clerk - Trustees
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
DURING THEIR REGULAR MEETING HELD ON MARCH 23 , 1989, REGARDING
APPLICATION NO. 6-88-63-7-30. 1 J.M.O. CONSULTING ON BEHALF OF FRANK
AND ANTOINETTE NOTARO, CALVES NECK ROAD, SOUTHOLD, N.Y.
MOVED to approve with the respect to the same area as this Army
Corps permit dated of public notice, 13441-881379L2 and not to
exceed 20' x 70 ' or 70 cu. yds. if revised, Trustee�Bredemeyer,
second by Trustee Bednoski, Vote of the Board: Ayes, Trustee
Bredemeyer, Trustee Bednoski, Trustee Smith, Nay: Trustee
Kujawski - Resolution adopted.
WHEREAS, J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Frank and Antoinette Notaro
applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the
provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold,
application dated June 26, 1988, and
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and
recommendations and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with
respect to said application on March 23, 1989 at which time all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and
documentation submitted concerning this application, and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that J.M.O. Consulting ON BEHALF OF Frank and Antoinette
Notaro BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE WETLAND
ORDINANCE TO:
Construct 4 ' x 20 ' catwalk, 8 ' x 60 ' float, 3 ' x 9 ' ramp, dredge to
remove approximately 50 cubic yards material from area 17' x 70' in
front of float.
This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed
if work has not commenced by said date. Fees must be paid and
permit issued within six months of the date of this notification.
Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified
upon completion of said project.
Please take notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
Joan Schneider - Clerk - Trustees
TIONS FOR PERMITS UNDER construct
THE PROVISIO dredge
beatning wallanda property
WET- nano dredge Eau basin u property
LAND ORDINANCE O TH B.tlpr�ted a 570 Mason Drive,
TOWN. Glrtdmgue,N.Y.
7:30 P.M.—In the matter of the 7:57 P.M.—In the matter of the STATE OF NEW YORK)
Application of En-Cwuulsants on be- application of En-Conmltand for
be-
hall of William Corwin m construct Kenneth Rath )SS:
re-
wooden deck over existing B m rove located COUNTY OF SUFFOLK)
north side of existingdwelling. place retaining
lk n Nuao Point Road Property
ego
Property is bated n New Suffolk N.Y.
Avenue,New Suffolk,N.Y.
78:05 P.M.—In the matter of the Ma r i h f t, Of MattltpCk, (n
:33 P.M.-1n the matter of the application of J.M.O.Cottsulting for RB W e£9
Application of En-Consultants for L Tconstructarto conscatwalk.nouP said County, being duly sworn, says that he/she Is Principal
Robert Keith to construct single and float.Property located on Mau, Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly Newspaper,
family dweping on property located Rad,East Marion,N.Y.
N.Y.N. wipia Creek Drive, Mattituek, 8:08 P.M.—In the muter of the published at Mattituek, in the Town of Southold, County of 7:36 P.M.—In the matter of the application of Proper-T services for Suffolk and State of New York,and that the Notice of which
'
In Wechtenew to construct deck,
Application of Frederick Krog for walkway, ramp and Boating docL the annexed Is a printed copy,has been regularly published In
mamtennce dredging. Property lo- Property located at 6:30 Oak Sueu,
• catedAsBudd'sPond R.ad,Southold, Camhogue.N.Y. _ said Newspaper once each week for 1— weeks
N.Y. 8:12 P.M.—In the matter of the successively, commencing on the , 6 da o f
7:39 P.M—In the matter of the ;applications of En-Consultants forFebruary
Y
application of J.M.O.Consulting for Monica Kenny,i s aL,and other Re F e br u a r Y
Laughing Waters Property Owners do Shores Y
Association to reconstruct timber replaceproperty owners n-
bulkhad, dredge, and to construct
moveparty located
dredgeake x /)
storage shed. Pr backfill Property orated u Lake
Property is loured +t Drive, Reydon Shoru, Southold,
Mmrtehaha Blvd.,Southold.N.Y. N.Y.
7:42 P.M.—In the matter of the
application of Costello Marine for 8:15 P.M.—In the muter of the
Mateo lettunich m reinforce:westerly ter, Application m
of En-Consultants for Principal Clerk
John VanVladricba m remove and
eaand rock seawall including
returns.rnms.s,and recrnswe cured rodt replace bulkhead,dredge,replace a-
Y
revetineuisting dock with hinged noup and
Propertrevelmentswith rocks and filter. Bo+L Property located n Lake Drive,
Southold, u Bay Horne Road, Reydn Shores,Southold,N.Y. $Wom t0 bei a IM this /S�
Southold,N.Y.N Y. 8:18 P.M.—In the maser of the MARY K.DEGkAII
7:45 P.M.—In the maser of the Application of En-Cnsultams for Q�OTARY PUBLIC,Stas of fd^w York
application o Antoinette additions and Frank Henry Arbeeny m rernove end replace dya/y/Of D _.Suffolk County No a'4�S60
Negro to ily we 2 icud to bulkhead, dredge, bac '(erm Expires Februar�l9�
single family dwelling including 8 i. r�OVd
B existing dock and replace with hinged
stairway,catwalk,amp,Bat and to ram and Bal. Property
on
dredge. Property located n Calves Lake Drive, Rcn 'Shores.
• .Jicck Rad,Southold,N.Y. Southold N.Y.
N`-7:48•P.M.=in`the matter of the :— ALL PERSONS INTERESTED
Application of En-Consultants for IN SAID .1.�RS SHOULD AP-
Marie and
stain ro reconstruct bulk- PEAR AT ITE TIME AND PLACE
NOTICE OF HEAR)NC had card stairway, conswct fixed ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE
ON THE WETLAND dock, dredge. Property located at GIVEN ANOPPORTIJNTTYTOBE Total$ 44 . 16
APPLICA MONS Mearobim Drive,Laurel,N.Y.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN 731 P.M.—In the matter of the HEARD. COMMENTS MAY BE
t THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL apPlicatim of Thomas Palmer to SUBMI79ED IN WRITING'PRIOR - Discount
BE HELD BY THE TOWN conswct catwalk,past deck remove TO THE HEARING. Not
TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF or replace existing shed,replace car- Dared:February 10,1989
TOUTHOLD,AT THE SOUTHOLD port with garage.Property located at Frank A.Kujewski,Jr.,
TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, 2050 Deep Hole Drive, Mettiluck, President f above named claimant) does hereby certify that
Or SOUTHOLD. NEW,.XgRK ON N.Y. Board of Tows,Trustees art thereof has been paid, except as therein stated,
TUESDAY,FebivarYA 7989,OF("`-_ 7:54 P.M.—fn she mane, of the By:Joan Schneider.Clerk
THE FOLLOWING APPLICA- application of Geoffrey Penny to 6187-17F16 id owing.
) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
��' S Signature
�' • J.M.O. CONSUITINq •
box 361 • NORTH COUNTRY ROAd
WAdINq RIVER, N.Y. 11792
(516) 929.3575
TEIEFAX (516) 929.5621 ...
W61LZ83�
February 25 , 1989
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
P.O. Box 728
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
Southold , N.Y. 11971
Attn: Mr . Frank Kujawski , Jr .
Re: Wetlands Application No. 639 , Notoro, Sputhold
Dear Mr . Kujawski :
Enclosed please find one copy of the U.S . D.O.A. permit which
was issued recently for the above noted proposed project. This
permit is the only outstanding one of which your offices have been
awaiting.
Sincerely,,
G1 E . Jus
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
Permittee Frank and Antoinette Notaro 156 Stuart Street, Lynbrook, New York 11563
(516) 593-7665
Permit No.
Issuing Office New York District Corps of Engineers (Public Notice No. 13441-88-1379-L2)
NOTE: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term
"this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted
activity or the appropriate official of that office acting under the authority of the commanding officer.
You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below,
Project Description: Construct a 4 foot wide by 20 foot long fixed timber pier elevated a
minimum of 4 feet above the plane of mean high water and construct a 3 foot by 9 foot
ramp and an 8 foot by 60 foot float. In addition, a 17 foot by 70 foot area in
front of the float will be dredged, with ten years maintenance, to a depth of 6 feet
below mean low water, removing approximately 50 cubic yards of material . All
dredged material will be placed in an upland site, where it will be suitably retained
from reentering the waterway. All work will be done in accordance with the attached
permit drawings.
Project Location:
IN: Town Creek, Shelter Island Sound
AT: Southold, Suffolk County, New York
Permit Conditions:
General Conditions:
1. The time limit for completing the work authorized ends on . If you find that you need
more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least
one month before the above date is reached.
2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and condi-
tions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make
a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain
the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of
this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area.
3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by
this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordina-
tion required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register
of Historic Places.
ENG FORM 1721,Nov 86 EDITION OF SEP 82 IS OBSOLETE.
!33 CFF 720-330)
1145-2-303b (Shelter Island Sound, Frank and Antoinette Notaro, maintenence dredge
1 pier assembly)
4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided
and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization.
5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified
in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a copy of the certification is attached if it con-
tains such conditions.
6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure
that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit.
Special Conditions:
Further Information:
1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to:
(X) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899(33 U.S.C. 403).
( ) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act(33 U.S.C. 1344).
( ) Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413).
2. Limits of this authorization.
a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal,state, or local authorizations required by law.
b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges.
c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others.
d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project.
3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following:
a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural
causes.
b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf
of the United States in the public interest.
c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused by the activity
authorized by this permit.
d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work.
2
e. Damage claims associated with any future modification,suspension,or revocation of this permit.
4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public
interest was made in reliance on the information you provided.
5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances
warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to,the following:
a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or
inaccurate(See 4 above).
c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision.
Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation
procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The
referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms
and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any
corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations
(such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the
cost.
6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless
there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public Interest
decision, the Corps will normally give favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit.
Your signature below, as permittee,indicates that you accept and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
(PERMITTEE. rank and Antoinette Notaro (DATE)
This permit becomes effective when the Federal official, designated to act for the Secretary of the Army, has signed below.
(DISTRICT ENGINEER)
(DATE)
When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred,the terms and
conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s)of the property.To validate the transfer of this permit
and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions,have the transferee sign and date below.
(TRANSFEREE)
(DATE)
3 1 U.a.GPO. 1988-520-324
TOWN CREEK - -
WIDTH-5O0'
/FL Ca DI u T H o
7R -1 .......
AREA
N TO6.0'AT MLW N. i
R
j o a ` 1ca?
Suffolk County
ZHagstrom Map 23
N --MOP 3 9,1?
TT u J M W-MLW ?
P-B.Q�4XZ�CdLW
y ._ 4
ALIV
11 IW
Applicant proposes to construct a W x 20 -
catwalk, 3' x 9 ' ramp, 8 ' x 60 ' float and
to dredge a 17 ' x 70 ' area to a depth of
6' at ML4d to allow for the docking of
the applicant ' s sailboat . At Town Creek,
Southold , Town of Sou hold, County of
Suffolk, New York. SCALE
Proposed 31x 80 ' [�
DWELUNC, railroad tie O �O X40
stairway
Applicant : Frank & Antoinette Notaro
gPurpose : Private docking and recreation
—� Datum: Mean Low [Dater
Locus : 72`05
j ' /41 03 '
W
CALVES NE(:K r AD SHEET 0� Z
J1�1.Q CONSULTING WADING I�IVE(Z ) N.Y.
r
EC I N VIE
SCALE
MT!�F 0 10 20 N
0
N
SEQ 95? CATWgLK W
Loz
PRCPCSED_8X60'FLOAT
C�
z_
' PR O�:OSED 3 X 9"RgMP �
LW OXY
J
_XISTINGJ30T-,D,�
PRO''paD BOT7OM
AREA TO BE DRED&ED TO -6,0' AT MLW O
� 7
� p
•e5?Ilfi 19 fl6�—_Sr NFK•k STATE DEPARTMENT OF EN\'IRONMENTAL CONSE16ON
�� EFFECTIVE DATE s
til L(, PtRMII NUMBER 11/17/88
10-88-1204
EXPIRATION DATEIS)
FACILITYiPROGRAns NUMBER(,) PERMIT
Under the Environmental Conservation Law 12/31/90
N/A
Article 15, Title 3: 6NYCRR 327, 6NYCRR 608: Article 25:
Water Duality Certification N Tidal Wetlands
Article
329: Aquatic Pesticides y Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360:
N Article 15, Title 5: Article 17, Titles 7, 8:
Protection of Water SPDES Solid Waste Management'
Article 15, Title 15: Article 19: Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373:
Water Supply Air Pollution Control' Hazardous Waste Management
Article 23, Title 27: Article 34:
Article Title 15: Coastal Erosion Management
Water Transport Mined Land Reclamation
cle 24: Article 36:
LongArticleIsland Title15, 15:
Freshwater Wetlands Floodplain Management
Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37;
Article 15, Title 27: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification, 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control
Wild, Scenic and Recreational C—Construct ('only), 0—Operate ('only)
I Rivers
PERMIT ISSUED TO
A
Frank & Antoinette Not-aro
1 ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE
156 Stuart St. L nbrook NY 11563 TELEPHONE NUMBER
AGENT FOR PERMITTEEICONTACT PERSON —
Ro Ha -e , En-Consultants
1 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROIECTIFACILITY(if different from Perm,lteel
i Town Creek - Southold Calves Neck Rd TOK'NIQQJfOfKKRC.Y UTM COORDINATES
{ LOCATION OF PROIECT)FACaITT COUSuffoI k Southold
Southold
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY
Construct two (2) additions to single familZ dwelling, a 3 ,feet x 80 feet
catwalk 4 feet x 20 feet, ramp 3 feet x 9 feet and float 8 feet x 60
an area 40 feet x 70 feet for dockinq of sailboat. The resu tantspoil
shall be in accordance with the attached NYSDEC approved plane
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ComplBy acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict
i—ance with the ECL,all applicable regulations and the conditionsspecified herein or attached hereto.
1 1 The permittee shall file in the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated in the special conditions.a notice of intention to commence
work at least 4R hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify himlher promptly in writing of the completion of the work.
1 The k at leas work shall be subject to inspection f o mens mezed representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended if
tted
the public interest so requires pursuant to ECL§71-0301 and SADA §40113).
ton illiv for all
amages.director
f whatever nature,and by whomever
3 The suffered.permittee
i has accepted
the expressly,
des bye the
heecution of rein and has the applicareed to mde nAy alnd save harmle s the State arom suit,actions.�damages oand costs of every name and descn p-
aris
g out
tion resulting from the said project
4 The Department reserves the right to modify. suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice, and, if requested, hold a hearing when.
al she scope of the project s exceeded or a violation of any cm- on of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found: or
b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose discoelevevered
facts:or
cl newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued.
5 The De.mttee is responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,including any forms,fees or supplemental information which may be required
by the Department. no later than 30 days(160 days for SPICES or Solid or Hazarduous waste Management permits)prior to the expiration date
to
the
or interfere with the
any
6 perm ennut¢d work lornot
asauthorizing the impartmeng nt of the applicant
title rorhinte est trespass realor1 personals property held or vented ainaa person rights n not aeparty to the Perm trs in order to . the
7 The permittee n responsible for obtaining any other permiu, approvals, lands,easements and nghtsof-way which may be required for this project
8 Issuance of this permit by the Department does not.unless expressly provided tor.muddy,supersede or rescind an order on Consent or determination by the Commissioner
issued heretofore by the Deparcment or any of the terms, conditions,or requirements contained in such order or determination.
he D ann)ent m t be in writing and attached hereto
9 Any modiLcation of this permit gra d b1
PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PER ITT Dn11Nl RATOR
ADDRESS Bldg.40,SUNY,Rm. 219
11/17/88 Christine Costo oulos Ston Br
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ., - ( Page 1 of 4
I _
r BMHP
5-21F6a M861-25, • •
,M131TIONAL GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (Title 5), 24, 25, 34, 36 and 6 NYCRR Part 606 ( )
10 That if suture operations by the State of New York require an al- other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the
teration in the position of the structure or work herein authorized. or project
if, in the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation 14 Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted
it shall cause unreasonable bbstruchon to the free navigation of said shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles.ridges across
waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a
the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of
resources of the State,the owner mas be ordered by the Department to a waterway
remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused 15 There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work
thereby without expense to the State. and if, upon the expiration or herein authorized
revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other 16 If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the project hereby
modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense
pleted. the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such to the State. and to such extent and in such time and manner as the
extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Department of Environmental Conservation may require.remove all or
Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted
any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site
structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable to Its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of
and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against New York on account of any such removal or alteration
the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 17 If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way
11 That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage that the project will be free from flooding.
or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused 18. If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 608, the NYS Department of Environ-
by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the mental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not
conservation or Improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under
no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977
12. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi- (PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met.
bility of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from 19 All activities authorized by this permit must be In strict conformance
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. U.S. Coast Guard, New York State with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part
Office of General Services or local government which may be required. of the permit application.
13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination
of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, Such approved plans were prepared by
solvents,lubricants,epoxy coatings,paints.concrete.leachate or any Roy Haje revised on 8/29/88
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely
removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for
disposal . No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands .
2. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from this project shall be seeded with an
appropriate perennial grass seed and mulched with hay or straw within one week of
final grading. Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is
established.
3. All dredged material shall be disposed on an upland site and be suitably retained so
as to not reenter any water body or tidal wetland area.
4. During the dredging operation, the permittee and his contractor shall make every
effort to restrict spillage of sediment during excavation and haulage. Dredging shall
be accomplished with a clam shell or other closed "bucket" equipment.
5. Excavated sediments shall be placed directly into the disposal site or conveyance
vehicle. No sidecasting (double dipping) or temporary storage of dredge material
is authorized.
t
6. Dredged sediment shall be contained in sealed water tight trucks .
7 . There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetlands as a result of the permitted
activity.
}I 8. Dredging is prohibited from June 1st through October 30 each year,
9. Within 30 days of completion of dredging operation a dredged survey shall be submitted
j to the Marine Regulatory Section of the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection.
1O.Dock or timber catwalk shall not be greater than 4 feet in width and be a minimum of
3 feet above rade* over vegetated tidal wetlands (*distance is measured from ground
DEC PERMIT NUMBER to bottom of dock sheathing) ,
10-88-1204 (continued see Attachment I)
' PROGRAM/FACILITY NUMBER
j N/a Page 2 of 4
ATTACHMENT I
PERMIT 410-88-1204
Special Conditions (continued)
11. No permanent structures may be built on dock without first obtaining
Department approval.
12. Dredging is only permitted on a one time only basis.
Supplementary Special Conditions (A) through (7) attached.
Additional Supplementary Special Conditions (K) , (M) , (N) and (0) attached.
d
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President c t" TELEPHONE
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President Lr3 (516)765-1892
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, IIIJOHN L. �
NOHENRY P. SMIHKI, JR.
BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 71.8
Southold, New York 11971
December 21, 1988
Mr. Robert A. Greene
Alternate Regional Permit Administrator
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Re: Frank and Antoinette Notaro Permit No. 10-88-1204
Dear Mr. Greene:
Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 6-88-63-7-30. 1
submitted by J,M,O, Consulting on behalf of Frank and Antoinette
Notaro.
We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead
Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on
same by January 21, 1989.
Very truly yours,
Frank A. Kujawski, Jr.
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK: jas
Enclosures
CC: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany-
Building Dept.
Army Corps of Engineers, Operations Division, Navigation Branch -,
Thomas Hart, NYS Dept. of State, Coastal Management
CAC,
ZBA-
Planning Bd. -
• J.M.O. CONSUITINq
box 361 • NORTH COUNTRY ROAd
WAdINq RIVER, N.Y. 11792
(516) 929.3575
TEIEFAX (516) 929.5621
DEC 31988
December 6 , 1988
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Attn: Mr . Frank A. Kujawski , Jr .
Re: Application No. 639
Notaro - Southold
Dear Mr . Kujawski :
Enclosed please find a copy of the "Letter of Consistency" recently
issued by the New York State Department of State . Kindly note
that this agency has completed its evaluation of the project as
proposed and certifies that the proposed activity complies with
New York State ' s approved Coastal Management Program policies .
As always , should you or any other member of the Board have
further questions or comments with regards to the above noted,
please do not hesitate in contacting this office.
Sincerely,
, a
Glenn E. Just
v
GEJ/te
Enc.
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ALBANY. N.Y. 1223 1-000 1
GAIL S.SHAFFER
SECRETARY OF STATE
November 23, 1988
Mr. Glenn E. Just
J.M.O. Consulting
P.O. Box 361
North Country Road
Wading River, NY 11792
Re: F-88-480
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/New York
District - Permit Application
N88-1379-L2 (Frank & Antoinette Notaro)
Town of Southold
Dear Mr. Just:
The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal
Consistency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit
activity complies with New York State' s approved Coastal Management Program,
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program.
Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information
submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification.
This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to
obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under
existing State statutes.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being notified of this decision by
copy of this letter.
Sincerely,
George R. Stafford
Director
Division of Coastal Resources
& Waterfront Revitalization
GRS: FMB:ng
cc: COE/NY District - Michael Infurna
NYS DEC Region 1 - Robert Greene
Town of Southold Trustees - Frank Kujawski , Jr.
7 •
525 Town Creek Lane
_ \ P. O.Box 1b21
\N\ Southold N.Y. lly"(1
December 5 , lybb
Southold Town 3oard of Trustees i4i
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold N. Y. 11971
He : Frank a Kntoinette Notaro
DEG application and permit
lU-bb-120!}
Dear BoardLveyour
This letter of y/2b/00 protesting the above
applicatiot flo ing dock to be built and moored
across froTown reek.
Pleas ntion also to the attached copy of the
permit calging an area 40 feet x '(0 feet (20OU square
feet ) , removing '(0 cubic yards of bottom spoil ( 1090 cubic reeeett) .
This appears to be a plan to dredge b.l inches of bottom from
2b0U sq. feet of bottom.
0f what use .ean it be, to increase the depth of the water by
3.1 inches? 0r is my new neighbor secretly planning to dredge much
deeper?
His whole plan for a huge dock and for 0 inches of dredging
is beyond my understanding, particularly when his boat could
simply be moored at the edge of the channel, just like the several
other sailboats in the creek.
Sincerely,
Elmet H. Latson
c-, o �
;ol-25c nEE0OkK S1AIk Dk PAk(MENI OF IN EFFECTIVE
L CON011CIN
EFFECTIVE DATE
YERMIT NUMBER 11/17/88
IF
0-88-1204 �
LITYIPROCRAM NUMBERW PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(s)
N/A Under the Environmental Conservation Law 12/31/90
Article 15, Title 3; 6NYCRR 327, N 6NYCRR 608: Article 25:
328, 329: Aquatic Pesticides Water Quality Certification Tidal Wetlands
PArticle 15,rotection r SPDES 17, Titles 7, 8: Article 27, Title 7; 6NYCRR 360:
of
Solid Waste Management`
Article 15, Title 15: Article 19: Article 27, Title 9; 6NYCRR 373:
Water Supply Air Pollution Control` Hazardous Waste Management
Article 15, Title 15: Article 23, Title 27: Article 34:
Water Transport Mined Land Reclamation Coastal Erosion Management
Articicle 24: Article 36:
LongeIsland Title15, 15:
Freshwater lWetlands Floodplain Management
Article 15, Title 27: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification, Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37;
Wild, Scenic and Recreational C—Construct (`only), 0—Operate ("only) 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control
Rivers
Ec
ISSUED TO
k & Antoinette Notaro
SS OF PERMITTEE
Stuart St. L nbrook NY 11563
TELEPHONE NUMBER
FOR PERMITTEEICONTACT PERSON
Ha 'e , En-ConsultantsAND ADDRESS OF PROIECTIFACILITY(It different from Permittee)
Town Creek - Southold Calves Neck Rd. urMcoogDINATEs
LOCATION OF PROJECTIFACILITY COUNTY TOWNICgfXXKNtKX
Southold Suffolk Southold
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY
Construct two (2) additions to single familydwellin a 3rfeetx 80 fppt
catwalk 4 feet x 20 feet, ramp 3 feet x 9 feet and float 8 feet x. 60 eet
an area 40^feet x 70 feet for docking of sailboat. The resultant s o'
shall be in accordance with the attached NYSDEC approved plan_
GENERAL CONDITIONS
ComplBy acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict
i-ance with the ECL,all applicable regulations and the conditions specified herein or attached hereto.
i 1. The permittee shall file in the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated in the special conditions.a notice of intention to commence
{ work at least 48 hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify him/her promptly in writing of the completion of the work.
2 The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended if
the public interest so requires pursuant to ECL§71-0301 and SAPA§401(3)
3 The permittee has accepted expressly,by the execution of the application.the full legal responsibility for all damages,direct or indirect,of whatever nature,and by whomever
suffered,arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions,damages and costs of every name and descrip.
tion resulting from the said project
4 The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice,and. if requested. hold a hearing when:
a) the scope or the project is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found:or
b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts:or
c) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued.
5 The permittee is responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,me ludmg any forms.fees or supplemental information which may be required
by the Department. no later than 30 days(180 days for SPDES or Solid or Hazarduous Waste Management permits)prior to the expiration date
6 This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the
permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any rights.title or interest m real or personal property held or vested in a person not a parry to the permit.
7 The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits,approvals, lands, easements and rightsrof-way which may be required for this project.
8. Issuance of this permit by the Department does not.unless expressly provided for,modify,supersede or rescind an order on consent or determination by the Commissioner
issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms, conditions.or requirements contained in such order or determination.
9 Any modification of this permit gra d by he D artryent m [be in writing and attached hereto
PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PER IT DMINI RATOR ADDRESS B1dg.40,SUNY,Rm. 219
{ 11/17/88 Christine Costo oulos Sto Br
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Page Of 4
,c . BMHP
STATE OF NEW YORK
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ALBANY. N.Y. 12231-0001
GAIL S.SHAFFER
SECRETARY OF STATE DEC f�
November 23, 1988
Mr. Glenn E. Just
J.M.O. Consulting
P.O. Box 361
North Country Road
Wading River, NY 11792
Re: F-88-480
U.S. ' Army Corps of Engineers/New York
District - Permit Application
#88-1379-L2 (Frank & Antoinette Notaro)
Town of Southold
Dear Mr. Just:
The Department of State has completed its evaluation of your Federal
Consistency Assessment Form and certification that the above proposed permit
activity complies with New York State' s approved Coastal Management Program,
and will be conducted in a manner consistent with this program.
Pursuant to 15 CFR Section 930.63, and based upon the project information
submitted, the Department of State concurs with your consistency certification.
This concurrence is without prejudice to, and does not obviate the need to
obtain all other applicable licenses, permits, and approvals required under
existing State statutes.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being notified of this decision by
copy of this letter.
Sincerely,
George R. Stafford
Director
Division of Coastal Resources
& Waterfront Revitalization
GRS:FMB:ng
cc: COE/NY District - Michael Infurna
NYS DEC Region 1 - Robert Greene
Town of Southold Trustees - Frank Kujawski , Jr.✓
J.M.O. CONSU[TINq
box 361 • NORTH COUNTRY ROAd
WAdINq RIVER, N.Y. 11792
(516) 929.3575
TELEFAX (516) 929.5621
NOV 2 9 ►ggg
November 28 , 1988
N.Y. S.D. E .C .
Bureau of Regulatory Affairs , Room 219
Bldg. #40, SUNY
Stony Brook, N.Y. 11794
Attn: Ms . Christine Costopoulos
Re: Tidal Wetlands Permit No . 10-88-1204
Notaro - Southold
Dear Ms . Costopoulos :
As per our telephone conversation earlier today with regards
to the above noted permit, please be advised of the following:
1 . ) That J .M.O. Consulting prepared all applications ,
site plans and section views with regards to this
project.
2 . ) As I explained to you during the course of our
conversation, pages 1 of 4 and 2 of 4 should read
"J .M.O. Consulting" .
3 . ) I am enclosing copies of the permit for your review.
4. ) It should also be noted that the new mailing address
for the Notaro ' s is P .O . Box 1349 , Southold , N.Y. 11971
Thank you for your continued cooperation.
Sincerely,
_
Glenn E . Just
l
GEJ/te
Enc.
cc: Frank and Antoinette Notaro
0 0
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v
,----'Aggulatory Affairs Unit
Bldg. 40, SUNY, Rm. 219 -
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Thomas C. Jorlin0
(516) 751-7900 Commbsloner
November 17, 1988
Frank & Antoinette Notaro
156 Stuart St.
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Re: Permit N0.10-88-1204
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Notaro,
In conformance with the requirements of the State Uniform Procedures
Act (Article 70, ECL) and its implementing regulations (6NYCRR, Part 621)
we are enclosing your permit. Please read all conditions carefully. If
you are unable to comply with any conditions, please contact us at the
above address.
Also enclosed is a permit sign which is to be conspicuously posted
at the project site and protected from the weather.
Very truly yours,
Marilyn E. Peterson
Program'Aide
MEP •rw
enclosure
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
48ER EFFECTIVE DATE
4204 11/17/88
.OGRAM NUMBER(s) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(s)
{ Under the Environmental Conservation Law 12/31/90
Article
329: Aquat c P st cides 27 Water Quality 8: Article 25:
328, y Certification Tidal Wetlands
Protcle 15,ection ofitle 5: Article Wat r SPDES 17, Titles 7, 8: Article 27,Solid Waste Title
Management* 360:
Article
e 1 : Article 27, Title 9: 6NYCRR
Water Supply Air
Title 15: APolluti3
on Control' Hazardous Waste Management
Article 15, Title 15: Article 23, Title 27: Article 34:
Water Transport Mined Land Reclamation Coastal Erosion Management
Articicle 24: Article 36:
LongeIsi Island Title15, 15:
Freshwater iWetlands Floodplain Management
Article 15, Title 27: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification, Articles 1, 3, 17, 19, 27, 37;
Wild, Scenic and Recreational C—Construct ('only), 0—Operate ("only) 6NYCRR 380: Radiation Control
Rivers
PERMIT ISSUED TO
Frank & Antoinette Nota o
ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE
156 Stuart St. Lynbrook. NY 11563
AGENT FOR PERMITTEEICONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER
Roy Ha 'e En-Consultants -
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROIECTIFACILITY(If different from Permittee)
Town Creek - Southold (Calves Neck Rd
LOCATION OF PROJECT/FACILITY COUNTY TOWNICXTJEIJEILWXY UTM COORDINATES
Southold I Suffolk Southold
DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED ACTIVITY
Construct two (2) additions to single family dwelling, a 3 -feet x 80 feet
catwalk 4 feet x 20 feet, ramp 3 feet x 9 feet and float 8 feet x 60 feet.
an area 40 feet x 70 feet for docking of sailboat. The resultant spoil
shall be in accordance with the attached NYSDEC approved plane
GENERAL CONDITIONS
By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compli-
ance with the ECL,all applicable regulations and the conditions specified herein or attached hereto.
1 The permittee shall file in theoff,ceof the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated in the special conditions,a noticeof intention tocommence
work at least 48 hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify him/her promptly in writing of the completion of the work.
2 The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended if
the public interest so requires pursuant to ECL 1710301 and SAPA§401(3)
3 The permittee has accepted expressly,by the execution of the application.the full legal responsibility for all damages,director indirect,of whatever nature,and by whomever
suffered,arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions,damages and costs of every name and descrip
tion resulting from the said project
4 The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice, and, if requested.hold a hearing when:
a) the scope of the project is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found;or
b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts,or
c) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued.
5 The permittee is responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,including any forms,fees or supplemental information which may be required
by the Department. no later than 30 days(180 days for SPDES or Solid or Hazarduous Waste Management permits)prior to the expiration date.
6 This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the
permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any rights,title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit.
7 The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals. lands,easements and rights-of-way which may be required for this project.
8 Issuance of this permit by the Department does not.unless expressly provided for,modify,supersede or rescind an order on consent or determination by the Commissioner
issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms, conditions,or requirements contained in such order or determination.
9 Any modification of this permit gra d by he D artrpen[m t be in writing and attached hereto
PERMI I SUANCEDATE PER IT DMINI RA O ADDRESS B1dg.40,SUNY,Rm. 219
11/1 88 Christine Costo oulos Stony Brook.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE l
Page 1 of 4
rc . BMHP
0
' A CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (Title 5), 24, 25, 34, 36 and 6 NYCRR Part 608( )
Aerations by the State of New York require an al- other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the
position of the structure or work herein authorized,or project.
,ion of the Department of Environmental Conservation 14. Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work herein permitted
.e unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles,ridges across
flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a
,rte of the State. or cause loss or destruction of the natural tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of
-es of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to a waterway.
.ve or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused 15. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work
reby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or herein authorized.
,vocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other 16 If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit,the project hereby
modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- authorized has not been completed,the applicant shall,without expense
pleted. the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the
extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or
Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted
structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site
to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of
and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against New York on account of any such removal or alteration.
the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. 17 If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way
11: That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage that the project will be free from flooding.
or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused 18. If granted under 6 NYCRR Part 608,the NYS Department of Environ-
by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the mental Conservation hereby certifies that the subject project will not
conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and contravene effluent limitations or other limitations or standards under
no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. Sections 301, 302, 303, 306 and 307 of the Clean Water Act of 1977
12. Granting of this permit does not relieve the applicant of the responsi- (PL 95-217)provided that all of the conditions listed herein are met.
bllity of obtaining any other permission, consent or approval from 19. All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance
the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard,New York State with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part
Office of General Services or local government which may be required. of the permit application.
13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination
of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, Such approved plans were prepared by
solvents,lubricants,epoxy coatings,paints,concrete, leachate or any Roy Haje revised on 8/29/88
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Any debris or excess material from construction of this project shall be completely
removed from the adjacent area (upland) and removed to an approved upland area for
disposal . No debris is permitted in tidal wetlands .
2. All areas of soil disturbance resulting from this project shall be seeded with an
appropriate perennial grass seed and mulched with hay or straw within one week of
final grading. Mulch shall be maintained until a suitable vegetative cover is
established.
3. All dredged material shall be disposed on an upland site and be suitably retained so
as to not reenter any water body or tidal wetland area.
4. During the dredging operation, the permittee and his contractor shall make every
effort to restrict spillage of sediment during excavation and haulage. Dredging shall
be accomplished with a clam shell or other closed "bucket" equipment.
5. Excavated sediments shall be placed directly into the disposal site or conveyance
vehicle. No sidecasting (double dipping) or temporary storage of dredge material
is authorized.
6. Dredged sediment shall be contained in sealed water tight trucks .
7. There shall be no disturbance to vegetated tidal wetlands as a result of the permitted
activity.
8. Dredging is prohibited from June 1st through October 30 each year.
9. Within 30 days of completion of dredging operation a dredged survey shall be Submitted
to the Marine Regulatory Section of the Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection.
1O.Dock or timber catwalk shall not be greater than 4 feet in width and be a minimum of
3 feet above rade* over vegetated tidal wetlands (*distance is measured from ground
DEC PERMIT NUMBER to bottom of dock sheathing) .
10-88-1204 (continued see Attachment I)
PROGRAKFACILITY NUMBER
N/a I Page 2 of 4
ATTACHMENT I
PERMIT #10-88-1204
.cial Conditions (continued)
11. No permanent structures may be built on dock without first obtaining
Department approval.
12. Dredging is only permitted on a one time only basis.
Supplementary Special Conditions (A) through (J) attached.
Additional Supplementary Special Conditions (K), (M) ,(N) and (0) attached.
SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL CONDITIONS
illowing conditions apply to all permits:
If any of the permit conditions are unclear,the permittee shall con-
tact the Division of Regulatory Affairs at the address and telephone
noted below.
B. A copy of this permit with supplementary conditions and approved
plans shall be available at the project site whenever authorized
work is in progress.
�CC. The permit sign enclosed with the permit or a copy of letter of
ng Yr approval shall be rotected from the weather and posted in a con-
CO spiicuous location at the work site until completin of authorized work.
,sed D. At least 48 hours prior to commencement of the project, the permittee
shall complete and return the top portion of the enclosed receipt form
r sic certifying that he is fully aware of and understands all provisions and
conditions of this permit. Within one week of completion of the
permitted work, the bottom portion of that form shall also be com-
pleted and returned.
E. For projects involving activities to be accomplished over a period of
more than one year, the permittee shall notify the Regional Permit
Administrator in writing at least 48 hours prior to the commencement
of resumption of work each year.
F. If project design modifications take place after permit issuance, the
permittee shall submit the appropriate plan changes for approval by
the Regional Permit Administrator prior to undertaking any such modi-
Eications. The permittee is advised that substantial modification !,
may require submission of a new application for permit.
G. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of
any wetlands or waterway by suspended solids, sediment, fuels,
solvents, lubricants, epoxy coatings, paints, concrete, leachate or
any other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the
project work.
I ,
H. Any failure to comply precisely with all of the terms and conditions
of this permit, unless authorized in writing, shall be treated as a
violation of the Environmental Conservation Law.
I. The permittee is advised to obtain any permits or approvals that may
be required from the U.S. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, NY !
District, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY 10278, (Attention: Regulatory
Functions Branch) , prior to commencement of work authorized herein.
J. The granting of this permit does not relieve the permittee of the
responsibility of obtaining a grant, easement, or other necessary
approval from the Division of Land Utilization, Office of General
Services, Tower Building, Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12242, which
may be required for any encroachment upon State-owned lands underwater.
Regional Permit Administrator
NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Bldg. 40, SUNY-Room 219
Stony Brook, NY 11794
(516) 751-7900
DEC g 10-88-1204
Page 3 of 4
TLB FOLLOUIITG CONDITIOIIS SIMLL APPLY IF CRECL'ED AS APPLICABLE
BY THE REGIOITAL PEMIT ADMVISTRATOR:
XX R. All dredging shall be coneucted so as to leave a uniform
bottom elevation free of mounds or holes.
L. All spoil material shall be disposed of either In the
Atlantic Ocean or at an approved U.S. Government Dumping
A Ground, as directed by the Dietrict Engineer, U.S. Depart-
LCI mens of ,the Army, Corps of Engineers. Any spoil material
,g yo, not intended for such water disposal shall be removed from
to Cl the site and disposed of at do approved upland site.
XX 1% All fill and spoil material shall be suitably contained at
sed i the work site so as to prevent its et OdiUg, leaching or o:her-
site wise entering into adjacent wetlands and waterways.
XyH. All peripheral rip-rep berms, cofferdam, rock revst.ments,
{ gabions, bulkheads, etc, shall be completed prior to placement
of any fill mateeial behind such structures.
XXX 0. All repairs to existing structures shall be confined to re-
placement of existing structural elements with no change in
design, dimension, or materials, unless specifically
authorized herein.
REGIONAL PERHIT ADI.,
IITISTRATOR
Division of Regulatory Affairs
DATE: 11/k7/68 ITYS Dart. of Environmental Conservation
Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219
DEC $
10-88-1204 Stony Brook, IIY 11794
(516) 751-7900
Page 4 of 4
1987
CHARLES T. HAISLTON
Chi6f, MARINE REGULATORY SECTION
NYS DEC, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection
Bldg. 40, SUNY, Sm. 225
Stony Brook, 11. Y. 11794
Re: Permit No.
Issued To.
L
Contractor's Address.
sing y: Contractor's Phone
Is to
.s.
Dear Sir: Contractor's Name _
_losed
act sit Pursuant to General Condition 110. 1 of the above referenced permit you
are hereby notified that the authorised activity shall commence on
. This Notice is to be sent at least two days in ne..-
vane of commencement of the project. The Permit sign will be posted at
the site and copy of Permit will be available at site for inspection.
Submitted by
FAILURE TO NOTIFY OP. POST SIGN HILL LEAVE OUNER/AND/OR CONTRACTOR SUD
JECT TO APPLICABLE PENALTIES FOR NOi1-CO12LIANCE F!ITH PERMIT CONDITIO1dE.
C1IARLEE T. HAMILTON
Chief, Marine Regulatory Section
UYS DEC, Bureau of Marine Habitat Protection
Bldg. 40, SUNY, Rm. 225
Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794
Re: Permit No. `
Issued To.
Contractor ■ Address.
Contractor's Phone
Dear Sir: Contractor's Name
Pursuant to General Condition No. 1 of the above referenced Permit, you
are hereby notified that the authorizad activity was completed on
Submitted by
DATE:
THIS NOTICE, WITH PHOTOS OF CON@LET D t1OPK AND/OR COITLETED SURVEY. IS
c TO BE SENT TO ABOVE ADDRESS PROt2MY UPOC COUTLETIOU OF PROJECT. FAILURE
= TO NOTIFY HILL LEAVE 0INER WID/JR CGNAC
TRTOP. SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE
0 PENALTIES FOR 11011-COIIPLIAITCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS.
r
0
Y
m
V
9FMA (8/8n-9d
New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation
rNOTICE
v
The Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has issued
permit(s) pursuant to the Environmental Conservation Law
for work being conducted at this site. For further information
regarding the nature and extent of work approved and any
Departmental conditions on it, contact the Regional Permit
Administrator listed below. Please refer to the permit number
shown when contacting the DEC.
Regional Permit Administrator
Permit Number A0 a ig 91.4 A90
—Y
Expiration Date
191311P07—
NOTE: This notice is NOT a permit
OWN CREEK
WIDTH-500( L= u\,T H 0.4
/FLCXn EI
-19
AREA `'
Fou
f N 7C6DAT MLW •F'
N. �"'
- tiFa:
�` / - �C
C / I 'e
_4
PR �' Suffolk County
Hagstrom Map 23
_ 30001
Z -
V)
W M W-MLW P Z
o i y
CLW
HW
Applicant proposes to construct a y 'x 20 '
catwalk, 3'x 9 ' ramp, 81x 60 ' float and
to dredge a 401x 70' area to a depth of
6' at MLW to allow for the docking of
the applicant ' s sailboat. At Town Creek,
Southold, Town of Sou old, County of
Suffolk, New York. SCALE
1'40'
Proposed 31x 80 '
DWELLING railroad tie 0 20 40
stairway
Applicant: Frank & Antoingtte Notaro 41��1.0
j Purpose: Pr 'K1'1'/4l!' 031
te doclW,,'and recreation
J Datum: rLocus: 7 N Y j D E r
AP, UJ
DATE Il6 LU
/0
CALVES NECK ROAD SHEET I OF 2
J .Q CONSULTING--- WADING RIVER, N.Y.
SECTION VIE
SCALE
V
0 10 20 p
, SEQ 9X20 CA7WALIC Z u,
17
co C51 U)
co
"I p Z 'm
°OSED 8X 60'FLOAT
� �l
- a
t
PROPDSED 3X9 RAMP
-- - - - MHW-r25'
LW OV
_XISTINC-.l3gT�M -
d
°RopOa`D BOT 7i7M
AREA TO BE DREDGED TO-6,0' AT MLW
m
t
standards for MM surveYs 135
by Ihs L.S. and approved and adopted
su b • • •
for y The Now York Slate Land
Tltle A affect.
i
I t _
r -9.9i' -Ssr -so,
_3•� 4,T �—�–
.' 6 0
•i "
�� -- TOWN - ;l_!!�3�1 ':,T- _ CREEK -
--INN � —�;2w - —
+.e:
--
- - - -- — S 7 -023'511 o
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
�J ale unt• along Iv - e.:.� . . ... - .- i.- .. A i
SOU TH0LD
1 10 _ 0 6 to TOWN Of SOUTH OLD
12 ro
/_
SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y.
0)/ a >~
¢ w. o a I I� 1000 - 063 07 301
' / SCALE I = 40'
a.,-� / � OCT 16 1987
m APRIL 3, 1988
47.3
f :1
/
soy n }
le /O �. Itu P' O
m zo Q x Jr. hs[ i 20
bar 10.7.
Q to� Jr3' Z
^ o,:, a L-CERTIFIE :O ,
1` W M M7' r.3 Q h I �J
7 i SOUTHOLD SAVINGS BANK' ; P°ie I�� ho f 3 u TICOR TITLE GUARANTEE
/
" 1 Jloie I 0 FRANK NOTAROE
a ' _ I P°�° I _� o ANTOINTTE NOTARO
cc
OD
Z i NYSDEC
\ ZE
Z . I I — yam DA�ti� Ib �m .
I 1
0 421 110
6000,
Ll v i'. �i .. .• dl� ��O SND S,('9
no l� �tr2 t' TjQ �iP
N. 74021� 20" W. MO.
° v til "Ay. S . LIC . N0. 4961$
s/ CALVES ro E C KR 0 AD P N EY 9 ENGINEERS , P.C.
AREA 408 153 SQ. FT. y
( PRIVATE ROAD I P. O.
MAI N
SOUTHOL D L N.Y. 11971
it
7y1\,
525 Town Creek Lane
P.O. Box 1621
Southold, N.Y. 11971
September 26 , 1988
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, N.Y. 11971
RE: Frank Notaro application
DEC #10-88-1204
Dear Southold Town Board of Trustees:
I wish to protest the application of Frank Notaro for a 60 ' x 8 '
floating dock to be built and moored across from my home on Town
Creek. These dimensions are exactly the dimensions of the present
floating
Millertandonowothe ownedwbytof Mr. Notato, Put Mrr. McDonald. This dockemny
isaof years
unappropriate size to the creek, and unsightly.
1) Until he has lived here a reasonable amount ppf time, I
suggest that Mr. Notaro should moor his boat with a4rs, chain
and rope; bow and stern on the edge of the channel, the way the other
sailboats are moored in the creek. (please note how the DeCarlos
were allowed to build a huge and unsightly bulkhead along their
entire waterfront in 1985, only to change their minds and put the
property uD for sale in 1987. But the huge and unsightly and completeli
unecessary bulkheads will be there for at least a generation. )
2) The DEC application does not reveal whether the floating dock
will be moored parallel to the shore or perpendicular. (The McDonald
dock is perpendicular. )
3) If perpendicular, the floating dock and sailboat would be
moored broadside to the open east end of the creek and to the
prevailing easterly storms.
a. This is poor planning and poor seamanship.
b. This would require extra mooring piles or anchors as
compared with mooring parallel with the shore and facing the easterly
exposure.
and4) It is most desirable that a floating dock be moored with anchor
chains, rather than with piles, which are unsightly, and subject
to ice damage and extractions through the combination of ice and
rising tides, and are not easily removable in the event of a change of
plans.
Frank Notaro• page 2 •
5) How long a boat is the 60 ' float designed for?
The Holmans (next door to the east) have a 28 ' boat moored to a 20 '
floating dock. The Blankleys on Jockey Creek have a 35 ' boat moored t
a 32 ' floating dock.
The 60 ' float would be long enough for a 70-80 ' boat! But, it
is rumored that the Notaros ' boat is 441 . For this length boat, a
35' float should be sufficient. It is also my feeling that our
creek is not appropriate for a boat any bigger than 45-501 , and
even that may not be suitable.
Please note that my suggestion that Mr. Notaro be willing to
simply moor his boat at the edge of the channel, as other sailboats
are would also eliminate the need to dredge the creek. Assuming a
present depth at low tide of 3 feet, a basin 3 yards wide, 20
yards long, and 4 yards deep would amount to 180 cubic yards,
So, Just as Mr. Notaro' s 60 ' float appears excessively big, his
request to dredge 258 cubic yards also appears most excessive.
Sincerely,
&�p
Almet R. Latson
cc: Marilyn Peterson, NYS DEC
Public Notice
US Army Corps
of Engineers In replying rotor to:
New York District
26 Federal Plaza Public Notice No. 13441-88-1379-L2
Now York.N Y 10276
ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH p Published: 30 SEPT 88 Expires: 31 OCT 88
To Whom It May Concern:
This District has received an application for a Department of the Army
permit pursuant to
/n Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403);
/-7 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344).
APPLICANT: Frank & Antoinette Notaro
156 Stuart Street
Lynbrook, New York 11563
ACTIVITY: Dredge with ten years maintenance and a floating pier assembly
WATERWAY: !own (,reek, shelter island Souna
LOCATION: Southold, Suffolk County, New York
A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are inclosed
to assist in your review.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of
the probable impact including cumulative impacts of the activity on the
prlblic interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both
p;-otection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which
rr!asonably may be expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced
against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be
relevant to the activity will be considered including the cumulative
effects thereof; among those are conservation , economics, aesthetics,
general environmental concerns , wetlands , cultural values , fish and
wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use , navigation,
shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation,
water quality, energy needs, safety, food production and, in general , the
needs and welfare of the people.
ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WRITING
AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE,
otherwise it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity.
Any person may request, in writing to the district engineer, before this
public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information
necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall
state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held.
It should be noted that information submitted by mail is considered just as
carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that
furnished at a public hearing.
NA_'IY FL-129
May 83
CENANOP-RE
APPLICATION NO. 88-1379-L2
PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 13441-88-1379-L2
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The applicants, Frank and Antoinette Notaro, requests Department of
the Army authorization to credge with ten years maintenance and to
install a floating pier assembly in Town Creek, Shelter Island Sound
at Southold, Suffolk County, New York for the stated purpose of providing
a mooring area for their recreational vessel .
The work would involve construction of a floating timber pier assembly,
consisting of: a 4 foot wide by 20 foot long fixed timber pier elevated
a minimum of 4 feet above MHW. A 3 foot by 9 foot ramp; and an 8 foot
by 60 foot floating pier. The applicant also anticipates dredging
a 17 foot by 70 foot area to a depth of -6 feet mean low water removing
approximately 70 cubic yards of material . All dredged material from
initial and subsequent dredging activities would be placed in an upland
site, where it would be suitably retained from reentering the waterway.
All work would be done in association with the upland construction
of a 3 foot by 80 foot railroad tie stairway to provide access to the
pier assembly.
SECTION VIE
SCALE
1=20'
0 lm p
N
PkY 1�F 9X20 CATWALK W 7
@%POSED_8X 60�FLOAT
7
S
PROr�SED3X- ,4AMP
i --MLW 0.0" j
i � _XISTINGJ3gT7p,U �j •
PROPOSED BOT 70M O
AREA TO BE GRED�cD TO -6,0' AT MLw
� 7
yJ.M.O. CONSULTING • r ?� �
1
J
box 361 • NORTH COUNTRY ROAd r��I1�' X•'��
WAdINq RIVER, N.Y. 11 792
(516) 929.35
TELEFAX (516) 929-5621
a,0
September 6 , 1988
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Attn: Mr . Frank Kujawski , Jr .
Re: Application No. 639 , Notaro, Southold
Dear Mr . Kujawski :
In regards to your letter of August 31 , 1988 (copy enclosed) ,
please be advised of the following:
1 . ) The applicant owns a 44 ' long sailboat which draws 5 . 5 '
water .
2 . ) It is not exactly known whether or not the specific
project site is recognized as an important shellfish
beds . As per the discussions held at last month' s
Trustee work session and meetings , it was brought
up that Town Creek has been extensively dredged in
the past .
3 . ) Enclosed please find a copy of the amended site plan
and section view which shows that the catwalk has
been reduced to 4 ' in width, the ramp has been reduced
to 3 ' in width and that the proposed area to be dredged
has been reduced and now the applicant is proposing
to dredge to 6 ' at MLW. This reduction in scope of
dredging shall result in approximately 70 c .y. of
spoil being removed . '�--�--�
As always , should you or any other member of the Board of Trustees
have further comments or questions with regards to this matter ,
please do not hesitate in contacting this office .
Sincerely,
Glenn E. Just ^C
GEJ/te
Enc .
cc: Mr . & Mrs . Frank Notaro
C'G L AC .
70WN CREEK .�.
WIDTH,500' u�, T °-L. -
/F OM FI \
J
AR�7�D
N 7061YAT AWN .Lo
4fcca
PRO(-8X60 F1 —4•, 43- Suffolk County
z Hagstrom Map 23
3nnn ,
N —MiQR 3 91R �3.�' z
w M W—MLW P ,
LL)
--- ALW
HW
Applicant proposes to construct a y 'x 20 '
catwalk, 3'x 9 ' ramp, 8 ' x 60 ' float and
to dredge a 40 'x 70 ' area to a depth of
6' at MLW to allow for the docking of
the applicant ' s sailboat . At Town Creek,
Southold, Town of Sou old, County of
Suffolk, New York. SCALE
Proposed 31x 80 '
DWELLING railroad tie O 20 40
stairway
Applicant: Frank & Antoinette Notaro �� U
j Purpose: Private docking and recreation
J Datum: Mean Low Water
Locus: 72`051/41" 03 '
W
9-
CALVES NECK ROAD SHEET Or 2
�M.Q CONSULTING WADING f?IVER, N.Y.
EC / N VIE
SCALE
=20'
0 10 ci
N
9X20 CA7WgU< T Z
j .
DOSED 8X 60'FLOAT
C�
PJR O.P0SED 3 X 9 RAMP
• I (� LW OV
_XISTINC-(3 TM -
U
PROPOSED BOT 70M
AREA TO BE DREDGED TO-6,0' AT MLW
m �
Y
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President Ln 1 TELEPHONE
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, 111 p (516) 765.1892
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. O
HENRY P. SMITH �l r�
BOARD OF TOU'N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
August 31, 1988
Mr. Glenn Just
J.M.O. Consulting
North Country Road
Box 361
Wading River, New York 11792
Re: Lambert Javalera - 637/10-88-1106
Frank & Antoinette Notaro - 639/10-88-1204
Dear Mr. Just:
The following actions were taken by the Board of Town
Trustees during their regular meeting held on August 25, 1988:
Resolved that the Town Trustees TABLE the application of
Lambert Javalera.
Resolved that the Town Trustees TABLE the application of
Frank & Antoinette Notaro pending a new plan for the work to be
done. ** (See additional comments on page two for this project.)
Very truly yours,
�
Frank A. j wski, Jr.
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK:ip
cc: Bldg. Dept.
Board of Appeals
D.E.C. , Stony Brook
file
Page 2.
Comments regarding the application of Frank & Antoinette Notaro
1 . What are the sizes and drafts of the vessels that are to be
accommodated at the proposed dock? Please provide more detail to
justify the request to dredge to 4 ' below MLW.
2 . Will any shellfish beds recognized as being important in
Town Creek be disturbed as a result of this activity? If so, to
what extent will the disturbance be, and what plans are there to
mitigate any adverse effects?
3 . The proposed vessel is to large for the area.
4. Submission of a mitigated plan of the work to be done as
discussed by the Board with the agent and landowner.
N. COUNTRY RD. • BOX 361
WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792
(5 16) 929-3575
guly 28, /988
N. Y. S. N. C. C.
Buaeau o� Re ulatoay A��aLrtA, Room 2/9
Bldg. #40, SUNY
Sfony Baook, N. Y. 11794
Attn: Ai. Aaatlyn. %efeaaon
Re: RpplLcafLon No. 10-88-/204
Notaav - Southold
deaa 111x. %eteaaon:
AA pea the "Noftce of Incomplete AppltcatLon" dated Yuly
27, 1988 (copy encloaedl, pleaae be advtaed o� the �ollowLny:
/. 1 The daedyLng. Ahall be done by chane on baage wLfh
clamAhell. SaLd baaye has on deck a afeel contaLnea
whLch LA ufLlLged �oa ipoLl Afoaase. Once aaLd
confaLnea La dull, the ApoLl Ahall be o��-loaded
and placed dLaectly Lnto dump taucha and then
tauched dtaectly to the Southold Town Land�Lll
On dLApoaal.
2. ) 8nclo4ed please jLnd 4 cop Lea o� the aequeafed
AeCtLon VLew.
3• ) 8ncloaed pleaae �Lnd 41copLei o� a aevtaed Atte plan
whLch depLctA_a 3 'x 80 aaLlaoad tLe itaLawa h
the Bvartd_Q. _ TauateeA o e /own of Sout o d rtequeafed
that-fhe appltcan a Aee Loa o cvna auc .
%lea.Ie- 6e a --,dtnai thea A ope
between the exLafLn.g houae and pnopvaed dock — It
La the / auateeA 6elLe� that L� the Notaao 'a would
conatauct fhLa Afataway Lt would mLtLg.afe any eaoALon
cauaed by the applLcanf 'A CZLM6L%Q, up and down
the alope whLle tayLny to appaoach and leave the
paopoaed dock.
44 alwayA, ahould you oa any mem6ert o� the technLcal Ata��
have �uafhea commenfA oa queatLonA wLfh aeyaada to thLa
paopoaed actLon, pleaAe do not heaLfate Ln contacfLng me.
Thank you �oa cyoua contLnued coopeaatLon.
Rnceaely,
C---�" I.
Glenn 6. Yu.at 7�
g6gl f e
enc.
cc: Southold Town %auateei
70WN CREEK
WIDTH,-500' L: u�r H o L D'
FLOM
AREA ��/ � .4 �\ £'� �Fo
N TO 80'AT IVLW „.�
ylcv?
to
QO PRC)P, 8X6O,F1 OA T -4.1 Suffolk County
Hagstrom Map 23
Z -
`> ?QP.
8A9RAMP -3.@'
LL, M W-MLW PROP. 8X OC nr�e. Y
-L8
u a y W
� IHW
Applicant proposes to construct a 8 'x 20 '
catwalk, 8 'x 9 ' ramp, 8 ' x 60 ' float and
to dredge a 40 'x 70 ' area to a depth of
8 ' at MLW to allow for the docking of
the applicant ' s sailboat . At Town Creek,
Southold , Town of Sou old, County of
Suffolk, New York. SCALE
I1�30' j
Proposed 31x 80 ' L�
DWELLING railroad tie 0 20 40
stairway
Applicant : Frank & Antoinette Notaro
gPurpose: Private docking and recreation
—� Datum: Mean Low Water
Locus : 72`05 '/41" 03 '
W
lu
CALVES NECK ROAD SHEET I OF 2
JM.Q CONSULTING WADING RIVER, N.Y.
SECTION VIE
SCALE
1=20'
N
0 10 d7 p
N
PkY DSFn-B�X 2�CATWALK `_ru Z
LO
P-RcPOSED- 8X 60 FLGATrZ
I �
O
I
PROr�OSED 8XSr-RAMP
MHW-tS z
--MLW 0:0' f-
g J
• Y 'y v y _XISTINGJ3QT
� z
o
_ v
PROPOSED BOT 7QM
AREA TO BE DRED;;SD TO -8.0' AT MLW
7
N. COUNTRY RD. • BOX 361 1
WADING RIVER, N.Y. 11792
(516) 929-3575
July 25 , 1988
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Attn: Mr . Frank A. Kujawski , Jr .
Re: Wetlands Application for Frank and Antoinette Notaro
Southold
Dear Mr. Kujawski :
As per your request , enclosed please find 6 copies of a
survey dated April 3 , 1988 . Kindly note that the surveyor ' s
have recently taken soundings at the site and they are shown
on this survey.
Very truly yours ,
Glenn E . Just
GEJ/te
Enc .
6d ,' (2 1,4 e-
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o � ..�.
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President tP ` - ' art TELEPHONE
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III tom')i. - (516) 765-1892
JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, J R.
HENRY P. SMITH
BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUCHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
July 25, 1988
Mr. Glenn Just
J.M.O. Consulting
North Country Road
Wading River, New York 11791
Dear Mr. Just:
The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees
during their regular meeting held on July 21, 1988 regarding the
application for Frank & Antoinette Notaro.
The Southold Town Trustees TABLED the application of Frank &
Antoinette Notaro for a Wetland Permit on property located on
Calves Neck Road, Southold pending receipt of a sketch showing
the access to the dock and possibly the reduction in the scope of
the dredging with the configuration of the dock reflecting a "T"
on the end to reach deeper water.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not
hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed
above.
Very truly yours,
Frank A. K 'awski, Jr.
President
Board of wn Trustees
FAK:ip
Cc: D.E.C. , Stony Brook
Corps of Engineers
CAC
file
Ot 2—PROJECT IMPACTS ANAEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations I
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily signific.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 sir
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshol
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropr
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each quest
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
C. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but thresh
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PARI
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moder
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. T
must be explained in Part 3.
nDE3
3Can Impact EIMPACT ON LAND Mitigated By
Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project si Project Chang
Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO XES
• Any construction on slopes of 15?0 or greater, (15 foot rise per 100foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑1'es ❑Nc
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than3 feet. ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles.• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑1es ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑
than one phase or stage. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑
tons of natural material (i e., rock or sod) per year. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill ❑
• Q,nstruction in a designdted floodway. ❑ []Yes ❑No
❑ ❑
• Other impacts Eyes ❑No
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
2 Will there be an erfect to _.ry u::.que or unusual Idnd rrns rOund on
the siter(i.e . cliffs. dunes, geoloGical formations. etc )._NO EYES
• Specific land forms
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6
1 2 3
IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact E
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated B
(Under Articles 15, 2.3, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) Impact Impact Project Chan
Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑Yes ON
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes V
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑ t,(
Yes �N
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑Yes ❑N
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10?o increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ []Yes ON
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ [:]Yes [IN• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑
[:]Yes ON
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action reocires water supply from wells with grearer than 45 ❑ ❑
gallons per minute pumping capacity. ❑}'es ❑N
• Construction or operation ¢using any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑}'es
supply system. 0,\
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑yes ON.
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,0U0 ;allons per ❑ ❑
Eyes ON.
day.
• Proposed Action will liken• c;,u,e si!tation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑
El Yes El N,
existing body of water to tr.-- es,tcnt that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petrol;um or chemical ❑
products greater than 1,100 t;allons. ❑ ❑Yes . ❑N,
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑
and.or sewer services. ❑ [:]Yes ❑N,
• Proposed Action locates com,--orcial and'or industriA uses which may ❑ ^
require new or expansion of r•x ist mr; wa>m treatment anrl;or storage
facilities
• Other impacts ❑
❑ ❑}'es ON
6 Will proposed action alter drain.iI;e fluw or patterns, or surraro
water runout ENO ❑YES
Ex_rnples that would apply to column
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows (—: !,
— ❑}'es ❑Nc
7
1 2 3,
Small to Potential Can Impact E
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Chan,
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N.
❑ ❑Yes ON,
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑
❑
❑ Yes 11 N,
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ❑N.
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑
hour. 1:1 Yes ❑Nc
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑
refuse per hour. ❑Yes ❑Nc
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour ❑ []Yes ❑Nc
.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑
to industrial use. ❑ Eyes [-]No
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑
development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑Yes ONO
• Other impacts: ❑
❑ ❑Yes ONO
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ ❑Yes ONO
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑
❑ ❑Yes ONO
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑Yes ONO
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑
Ur mature forest (over 100 years or age) or other locally important ❑Yes No
.egetauon
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
Examples that swuld apply to column 2 ONO ON ES
• rhe proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑
land (includes cropland, haynelds, pasture, vrttevard, orchard, etc.) ❑11t5 ONO
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Bt
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Chang
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of Cl ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑
land management systems (e. ❑ ❑1'zs ❑No
g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO ❑YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether ❑ Eyes ❑No
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑
screening of scenic dews known to be important to the area. Eyes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑1'es ❑,No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ONO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register []Yes [:]No
of historic places.
• 4ny impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑•
project site. res ❑No
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑
archaeological sites on [fie NYS Site Inventory. ❑ ❑Yes No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Wes
❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
11 %V,ll Proposed Action affect the quantrty or quality of exwting or
future open spaces or recreational opportunmesi
Examples that would apply to column 2 7—NO EYES
• The permanent toreclosure or a tuture recreational opportunity
Amajor reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑les ❑No
• Other impacts ❑ ❑Yes 11 No
❑ ❑
[]Yes El No
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION nJ'Can
313. will there be an effect to existin Can Impactg transportation systems? Mitigated E
Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YESProject CharAlteration of present patterns of movement of people and!or goods.Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑Yes ❑Other impacts: ❑Yes ❑;
❑Yes 0.-
IMPACT
;IMPACT ON ENERGY
15will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply?
Examples that wouldapply to column 2 ONO DYES
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of
any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes Of
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family 11 ❑Yes ❑t`
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts:
❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑f
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO ❑YES
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility. ❑ ❑ Dyes ON
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceedin gthe local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑N
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act ld as a r
noise screen. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0
• Other impacts: ❑
❑ Dyes ON
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO OYES
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event or ❑ ❑ti es ❑,N',
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of hazardous wastes" in any ❑
form (i e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactise, radioacnre. irntaunG, ❑1'es ON,
inrecuous, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or rnort, ;allons of lirluified natural ❑
gas or other rlammable liquids. ❑ ❑Yes ❑Ni
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑
Within _'.000 feet or a site used ror the disposal or solid or hazardous El ❑les ❑'NL
waste.
• OtF-r impacts
❑ ❑ Oyes ❑Nc
10
14 14-11 . 61 1.21SEAR
Appendix B •
Sete Environmental Quality Review
Visual EAF Addendum
This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question I 1 of Part 2 of
[the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency)
isibility Distance Between
Project and Resource (in Miles)
1. Would the project be visible from: 0.1/4 1/4-1/2 t/z-3 3.5 5+
• A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑
to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation
of natural or man-made scenic qualities?
• An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ - -- ❑ ❑ ❑
observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural
or man-made scenic qualities?
• A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Registers of Historic Places?
• State Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
natural features?
• National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑
or Recreational? ❑ El
• Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak?
• A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for
establishment or designation?
• A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
scenic?
• Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
• Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is the risibility of the project seasonal?0 e., screened bV summer foliage. but visible during other
seasons)
11 Yes ❑No
3. Are anv of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year
during which the project will be visible?
`Yes �No
1
FEssentially
N OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT
item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding
nt.
Within
*'/a mile * 11 mile
developed ❑ ❑
Forested ❑ ❑
Agricultural ❑ ❑
Suburban residential El ❑
Industrial ❑ ❑
Commercial ❑ ❑
Urban ❑ ❑
River, Lake. Pond ❑ ❑
Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑
Designated Open Space ❑ ❑
Flat
Hilly ❑ ❑
Mountainous ❑ ❑
Other ❑ ❑
NOTE: add attachments as needed ❑ ❑
5. Are there visually similar projects within:
*1,12 mile El Yes ❑No
*1 miles 1:1 Yes 1:1 No
*2 miles ❑Yes ❑No
*3 miles ❑Yes ❑No
Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate.
EXPOSURE
6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is
NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate.
CONTEXT
7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is
FREQUENCY
Activity Holidays/
Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally
Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ 11 ❑
Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
At a residence ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
At worksite ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other
I
2
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER 1 2 3
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Small to Potential Can Impact E
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Moderate Large Mitigated By
LINO DYES Impact Impact Project Chanc
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑`;es ❑Nr
protect is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑M
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑
❑yes ❑Nc
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Nc
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑
or areas of historic importance to the community. ❑ ❑}'es ❑Nc
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ El ❑Yes ❑Nc
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑
❑yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑
❑Yes ❑No
19 Is there, or is there likely to be public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO ❑YES
If .any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 2VALUATIOiJ OF THE RAPORTANCc OF IRP-'-' ."TS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may f
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1 Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicablej how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(>
3 [lased on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurnnq
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility. mcludmq permanently lost rosource, of value
• Whether the unpact can or will he conrrolled
• The regional con,equence of the impar t
• Its potential divergence trorn local needs and goal,
• Whether known oblccuons to the project ru Lrte to this unpa,-t
(Continue on attachm,•nts)
11
V• 2• LEAD AGENCY DECLARATION - J.m.O. CONSULTING FOR
FRANK & ANTOINETTE NOTARO
RESO, that the Southold Town ustees declare itself lead
agency in rega to the State vironmental Quality Review Act
in the matter of the a is on of J.P.I.O. Consulting on behalf of
Frank and Antoinette aro a
Wetland Permit on rtain property ted on Calves Neck Road, Southold.
C. Fj
o��i�
TELEPHONE
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES (516) 765-1892
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF
SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT
PURSUANT TO THE LAWS , ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE
COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS
OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD.
6y-63- 7- 30• /
APPLICATION NO. __----DATE OF APPLICATION
--- - --v----- June 26, 1988
____
IDENTITY OF APPLICANT Frank and Antoinette Notaro
516-593-7667
------------------ PHONE NO
ADDRESS OF APPLICANT 156 Stuart Street, Lynbrook, N.Y. 11563
-------------------------------------
TAX MAP NO. 1000-063-07-30 . 1
-------------------- -- -- - --- ---
AGENT_-----_ Glenn E. Just/J.M. O . Consulting -
----- ---------------------------------------PHONE NO .__
PERMIT REQUESTED TO construct 2 additions to an existing Single family
dwelling, 8 'x 20 ' fixecT dock,-Brx�3 raaTp,- *-
a 40 'x70 ' area to a depth of 8 ' at MLW to allow for the docking of the
applicant ' s sailboat at the ----------
proposed site . The resultant
(seu attached}
LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED Calves Neck Road,
------------------
Southold, N.Y.
---------------------------------
HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION
-----------------------------------
CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY Town Creek
----------------------------------
SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK 8 'x20 ' fixed—dock, -8 'x9 '-
ock, 8 'x9 ' ramp and 81X60 ' float
LENGTH fixed dock-20 ' , _ramp 9 ' , and float dock 60 '
WIDTH__-fixed-dock and float 8 '
HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER4 '
. ----------------------------------—------
spoil (approximately 258 c .y. of sand) shall be trucked to
the Southold Town landfill for disposal .
DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER
6 '
--------------------------------------------------
YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED -258 c .y .
YARDS TO BE FILLED 0
-------------------------------------------------------
WIDTH OF CANAL , CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY -400 '
--------------------------
DEPTH AT LOW TIDE Please see enclosed survey
-------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE
3 '
DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL 150 FT.
DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA 0 FT .
IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? - Private
AREA ZONINGResidential
MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED crane with
--------------------
clamshell
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY Private Residence
. ------------------------------------------------
DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE
unknown
--------------------------------------------------------------------
AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT
STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER
ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL
AGENCY_--None .t9 my_knowledge--------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------_
DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE
PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF
THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY none should—be—necessary
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE
APPLICANT. enclosed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED THAT WOULD
PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? no
• •
' 14-16-2 (2187)-7c CT
617.21 SEAR
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts.
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will he prepared.
A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible offi(er)
Date
1
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed mai hd+o .i i niiu ,int eltect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions Mill be (On+Idered
as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public n +iew. Pro.icle all additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAT will be dependent on information currently available and mill not imolve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
ccaw" l_ ci,
NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR �1 II BUSINESS TELEPHONE
ADDRESS
C"� 3(01 IV Cf Ak C_(-'(- - Gc.,c},
CITYIPO` STATE ZIP CODE
NAME OF OWNER( ®rent) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
C 1 cz - I c: C: __(_)/1-) L AL3 �k
ADDRESS
15 Fu�[. 4J
CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE I
c-'
DESCRIPTIO? OF ACTION
SCC c
I
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas
1 Present land use: []Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) lAural (non-tannl
❑Forest ❑Agriculture LJOther
2. Total acreage of project area: ��.�1 �� acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPILE I ION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) —_ acres .-__. acres
Forested acres _ acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc ) _—_ acre: acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) — acres ___._ __ acres
Water Surface Area —..__ acre, _ acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) c acres _ �_.L._� -� acres
Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces — acre, —CI C2 acres
Other (indicate type) _ __ acres acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? / 1C:n[f_:)
a. Soil drainage I.7Wedl drained lCC % of site ❑Moderately well drained __ % of site
[-]Poorly drained % of site
b If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within sod group 1 through 4 of the Ny 5
Land Classification System? AaJA acres (See I N'rCRR 370)
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 1 Iles -iK -
a. What is depth to bedrock? 1 C'CC (in feel)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ❑0-10% % E110-1 5% %
❑15% or greater lof, %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes WKO�
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [IN es Lwe
8. What is the depth of the water table? X16 (in feet) ��
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes tJT 0
10. Do hunting, fishingor shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? es ❑No
11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
❑Yes F4<o According to
Identify each species
12. Are there any unique r unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
[]YesL�N0 Describe
13 Is the project site pr ently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
❑Yes LJi`Jo If yes, explain
14. Does the presentsitee elude scenic views known to be important to the community?
❑Yes Lilo
15. Streams within or contiguous to project area:
iJ IV7 a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name I(%cn cceP k b. Size (In acres) 1U/t7
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? B;re�s ❑No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Y'es Qtq�o
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes EKO
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous�tt a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes EdfJo
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑y'es 17K�o
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor0,FSc-I-I acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed acres initially; iAUE�15 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped (7. acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: fJIP% (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed Ll-3 %;
f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposedy'
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)? t
h If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially c.
Ultimately c'.w
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; _ width; S_ length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft.
3
2. How much natural material (i.e , rock, earth, etc.) will be rem�osed from the cite/ t✓r�___ tons ( UIM Nards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No FIA
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑1'es ❑No
c Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes ❑No
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site+ C' CC's'- acres
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes C$K10-
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction C months, (including demolitionj
7. If multi-phased: fU 11A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition)
c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year
d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑1'es ❑No
8. Will blasting occur during construction? []Yes MCO
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 after project is complete __
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project E4
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? []Yes LPI_O If yes, explain _
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes M<0-
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
�
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes 591 o Type
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes 0� o
Explain
15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Eyes UNIT
16. Will the project generate solid waste? []Yes (jxlo�
a. If yes, what is the amount per month _ tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? []Yes []No
c If yes, give name ; location
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? I Nes I !No
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? []Yes L;tVo
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? []Yes Ls4K
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? 1:1 Yes
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ❑Yes [.R o
If yes , indicate type(s)
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day /V I fC gallons/day
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes wwo
If Yes, explain
4
25. Approvals Required: • • Submittal
Type Date
City, wn Village Board QYes ❑No I_CUS MCPS- I �F
City, Town, Village Planning Board []Yes f3fo
City, Town Zoning Board Dyes GTO
City, County Health Department Dyes [UfKo
Other Local Agencies {'fres ❑No '�Cc.%•� l�..0 ��2
Other Regional Agencies iqre—s ❑No 1. S l—
State Agencies IiKe s ❑No (V•-/. J.LD,E.0
Federal Agencies [�,es ❑No l.��J.�-C ,{.�,. '
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Eyes l;f<o
If Yes, indicate decision required:
❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? �E'.`:cyuPsl ��e.
�1 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
�N �
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site?
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
/6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local {and use plans? ❑Yes ❑No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/L mile radius of proposed action?
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a !4 mile? ❑Yes ❑No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed?
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes ❑No
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? Dyes ❑No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑1'es ❑No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? []Yes ❑No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Na Anjr)in-PLL ILIC4,7Z, Date 67
c,
Signature z Title `}��-Siz CLr'r-7f JL1
If the action is in the oastal Area, afid ou are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by dte question: Have ml response, and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 sunply
asks that it be looked at further
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2 If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3 A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible Thi:
must be explained in Part 3
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change
1 Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site?
ONO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑yes F1 No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than L ❑ Llles L-1 No
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1-1 No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ LI ❑)es Ll No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑les f ]No
• Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ FI)es LNo
• Other impacts ❑ ❑ Ll es -.1 No
2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO ❑YES
• Specific land forms: ❑ ( l ❑les ❑No
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3 Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL)
❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ EJ Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body
of water? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
• Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
6 Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
7
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion ❑ LJ ❑Yes IJNo
• Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns ❑ ❑ EI)es f_INo
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ El ye, LJ No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I lNo
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Nes ❑No
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Nes ❑No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Nes LJNo
to industrial use
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑NO
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8 Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species? LJNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑yes ❑No
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ L)e, LI No
9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ LJ)e, INo
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ LJ LJNe, I _ No
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ L] ❑yes ❑No
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ❑NO ❑YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13 Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 ❑NO ❑YES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
9
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By
ONO ❑1 ES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods ❑ I_) ❑le+ LINO
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems ❑ _l L-1 e-, L]No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑1'es ❑No
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? ONO OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ Ll ❑No
any form of energy in the municipality.
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy IJ ❑ LI)es LJNo
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result
of the Proposed Action? ONO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ LJ ❑yes []No
facility.
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per clay) ❑ ❑ D)es ❑No
• Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑les ❑No
noise screen.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑1'es ❑No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
LINO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ J ❑Yes ❑No
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
• Proposed Action may result in the burial of 'hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ FI)v-, ❑No
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Nes ❑No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0N0
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ LI)es 1:1 No
10
1 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change
❑NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Y'es ❑No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑1'es ❑No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO ❑YES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2.
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
• Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
11
qr
42
$ � r F
—\.�—s8
U N D
�:\ � ,;:eco ]'bY" � •.
O KE9 p
X 1. MMM y V V
v
GOLDSMITH'So
ae 11
/ (�"j aa.
INLET PARK - \ \�\ r 7 ( r*r"0
C'alys (COUN rYI
UTHOLE
o
I _ ea •ti l'�o ..] K r`x�\�\f Vie .
Founders
i\ [—l/Il�m\ Ham. Landcn9
Cr
5t
d SOUTHOLD
ID
k C .% P E C O N 1 c B A Y
119 5 8
Cr z
eL4 )
qI
>i u [ g/GREAT ` HOG
\ / / I �� �' I II r••;`J -�..�W NECK
Z
Irl {�SY " O
ev�W.l"EDW
EAST - - ° •` '} �.- a
:UTCHOGUE '% •I ��' Cor9 a o E.�
CEDAR
CAEDAR BEACH
FARR
Et A Y
U .E Cedar Beach
''''�� PDant
Pt ..• '( i1.tG �a0 QSOa
DGUE �� I� NASSAU n /'
POINT
'OR °��e}�,/
-- ,�--- -- ,---- „T - - r-I --
k,`RW.-�. u.-`:IdF
j4
r ( - - - z7 i
i i ` . r♦ r 'e PI i
iiiii FFEglx _ ad - xx x '��\\ ;I ;
¢25GB of:, "" � •.� % 3` � _
: i fay
4 "•Wp°� Io .. PVC
$b '- � Ali I' d � • — ♦ a
_: �C � � 9 '•1 s
I:
P •
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )
STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS:
��&iw1 BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES
AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE. ASOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS,
AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST
OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE
MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY
THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO
HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND
FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY
VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED.
In completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees
agent or representative to enter onto my property to inspect tAe
premises in conjunction with review o ' is a*Tp 'cation.
SiGNAtURE OF �Cdd, 6 I1 RT
\ CHARLES W. BOWMAN
,� NOTARY PUBLIC, S1.1, of jaw Yo,k
SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ,'.L`. No. 3666958, S.11olk Coumy
Commission Expire; A4"*-a0,_lgq,%y
DAY OF 1 9 r�i� 121J�
61 'oC 431oW •t^ytlxl YupgWWtlj
'Aluno3 ilDll^S '856099Y 'pH
MOA McH 10 DIDIS ':;M[N A9YIhN
NOTARIY PUBLIC 11V"OIA09 'M 9114YN-)
EXAMINED
APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97)
APPROVED "BOAT, DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32)
DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) '
DISAPPROVED "BOATS , DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) ,
CONDITIONS, IF ANY
EXAMINING BODY
SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN
COMPUTATION OF FEES
Approved 2/27/65
Date:
To All Regulatory Agencies :
Please be advised that Glenn E. Just/J.M.O. Consulting
has my' permission to apply for all permits necessary to complete
this project.
I
I
W e u
a0 2 )- e
J
a O z
� F = p0 - _E
o
O Q F-
J Z Z
Q F J WW
} 0 Y N u u d M, rn m
W O J p In O a Nz
Oi�oo JP,� p w
to O D >c� z nJ Y
-� - N p vaiWFw__. _._-_ ?Z _
O J O
I
(I w o F Zzz W OJ 'tA `s _
_ �` r� o �3� • '�`
OOKz a _
JIIIl1 I
I II1
I! I i3rvM tl310 JG (1Ntl l\ / y/N
V
I I I I 09 96I\ !g j- M „Ob ,BF oSI s a+
Iw 1
1� Opp
PPPPPP N. I
PW
II • `` w
9 O>
V _
z
o�1f a\
,£6 SO2\3„Ob,B£ oSl\N �e 1\
d m Y
tl311,W\p ytlW m6 tl3111W Ntltlb$ JiG/N
W sea'•3o i l � �i I I c
o2
I
• ��S�FFotK '0
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President ti TELEPHONE
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President Uf7
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, IIIJOHN L. 0 (516) 765-1892
HENRY PB SMITH
KI JR
BOARD OF TOWN. TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
July 12, 1988
Mr. Robert A. Greene
Alternate Regional Permit Administrator
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation.
Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219
Stony Brook, New York 11794
Dear Mr. Greene:
Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 639
submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Frank and Antoinette Notaro.
We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead
Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on
same by August 1, 1988.
Very truly yours,
;dna. L12 �,ar , 9 (�
Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. ,
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK:ip
Attachments
cc: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany
Southold Town Building Dept.
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, IR., President � � TELEPHONE
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516) 765-1892
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, IIIJOHN L. O
HENRY P. SMITH KI JR
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
July 12, 1988
Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman
Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council
Southold Town Hall
Main Road
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mr. Holzapfel:
Transmitted herewith is application no. 639 for a Wetland Permit
submitted by J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Frank & Antoinette Notaro.
Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations
with resect to this application.
i`
Very__ truly yours,
Frank A. Kujawski, r.
President
Board of Town Trustees
FAK:ip
Attachment
0
5�FF01,�
FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President oO ` CO TELEPHONE
ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516) 765-1892
JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III Ojy
JOHN L. B OH KI, JR.
HENRY PSMI
BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 728
Southold, New York 11971
Date: July 12, 1988
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by
J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Frank & Antoinette Notaro in connection with
their application for a wetland permit to construct two additions to an
existing single family dwelling, 8' x 20' (iced dock. 8' x 9' ramp, 8' x 60' float
dock and to dredge a 40' x 70' area to a depth of 8' at mlw to allow for the docking
the applicant's sailboat at the proposed site. The spoil (approximately 258 cu. yds. )
shall be trucked to the Southold Town Landfill for disposal. Property is located at
Calves Neck Road, Southold. Q )?
Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. ,P�res.
Board of Town Trustees
Posted: July 12, 1988
ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NG.V.D.
Prepared in accordance wllh the ralaimam
by Cher L. A. llde surveys as esloblisleal
d.p
by the h use by and approved and adapted
TI such use by The New York Stole Land
Tllle Assaclatlun.
4 a
o
10
�
I 6� TOWN - -�=
��,� .r CREEK _
� _�{}II ---
f2.P C 40 �—r—
-S
SURVEY OF PROPERTY
AT
e 4
to SOUTHOLD
,z �� _0=� I° TOWN Of SOUTHOLD
14 0/ / _ l� On SUFFOLK COUNTY , N . Y.
w / 0 � w�re 1000 - 063 - 07 - 301
J
y13�a1 �p x SCALE la = 40'
If
c I T i OCT 16 , 1987
a n zA - m APRIL 3, 1988
le 24 " /'iz ,+y
z° lar p zO '
�
w M N>' y.g' Q x>s'3. " °'w a CERTIFIE4 70
LL1` J ° t P°"" 12a �4•a ;�'J SOUTHOLD SAVINGS BANK
TICOR TITLE, GUARANTEE
a`\ z 2 Ley°°fie o\ FRANK NOTARO
�4' I I "_' •m ANTOINETTE' N07ARO
a
ro
o z
on �I 0 °
p\
Y \ _ 6000' _ 3°I I >� -ilN ij a,r •.. ,` d',a �VLANO& �l
`9`
mar`nae N. 740 21' 20" W. a).00
` / S Y. S . LIC . NO. 4961$
i
x� CALVES N EC K !R 0 A D P + NI EY 9 ENGINEERS , P. C.
AREA = 40, 153 SO. FT. A
l PRIVATE ROAD 1 I
P. O.
MAI N
SOUTHOL D ;, N.Yy 11971