HomeMy WebLinkAbout78 School House RoadPLANNING BOARD MEMBER~
JERILYN B. WOOD}lOUSE
Chair
RICHARD CAGGIANO
WILLIAM J. CREMERS
KENNET}l L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
P.O. Box 1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11971-0959
Telephone (631) 765-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
RECEIVED
8EP 2 0 ~' '~'~
To: Ms. Elizabeth Neville, Town Clerk %uth01d Town Cler~
From: Jerilyn Woodhouse, Chairwoman. j~//
Re: Request for Waiver from Local Law Temporary Moratorium on the
Processing, Review of, and making Decisions on the applications for Major and
Minor Subdivisions, and Special Use Permits and Site Plans containing dwelling
Unit(s) in the Town of Southold for the site plan of The Hamlet of Cutchogue,
LLC, 78 School House Road, Cutchogue, NY. SCTM# 1000-102-1-33.3
Date: September 17, 2004
The proposed action involves the creation of a mixed residential development.
The development would include 137 single-family residential homes and 64
townhouses on 46.16 acres within the Hamlet Density Zoning District.
The Planning Board has reviewed the request for a waiver of the moratorium and
recommends that the Town Board deny the request for a waiver. This decision is
based upon the following facts:
Land Use - The project site is located in an area that contains a mix of land
uses: residential to the west and southeast, commercial to the south, institutional
to the southwest and agricultural to the north and northeast. The proposed
application is in keeping with the zoning of the parcel, which provides for a more
intense level of residential development than currently exists nearby. The site is
currently vacant land, with the proposed development resulting in 201 new
dwelling units, a clubhouse, tennis courts, a swimming pool, and neighborhood
open space. The proposed density is equivalent to quarter-acre density, not
including non-residential structures and roads.
Transportation Infrastructure - The proposed action is expected to increase
traffic generation on S.R 25 at its intersection with Griffing Street, and, to a lesser
degree, at the intersection of Schoolhouse Lane and Depot Lane.
Natural Resources - This parcel was farmed at one time, but has been
unplowed for many years, resulting in the presence of mature old field and early
sucessional woodlands.
Water Supply - Sanitary disposal within the proposed subdivision will require an
on-site sewage treatment system. A public water supply would have to be
provided by either an on-site community well or an amendment of the water main
map to allow the extension of public service.
Rural Character- The application reflects the designated zoning, which is
intended to allow more intense residential development than is permitted
elsewhere in Town.
Agricultural Lands - This land has not been farmed for many years.
Open and Recreation Space - The site is comprised of mature old field and
woodland and is not known to be used for any recreational activities.
Conclusions:
It is the Planning Board's finding that while the proposed project is in keeping
with the zoning district in which it is located, the Town has adopted a moratorium
with the intent of addressing and implementing comprehensive planning
initiatives relating to residential projects of this nature.
ELIZABETH A. NEVILLE
TOWN CLERK
REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS
MARRIAGE OFFICER
RECORDS MANAGEMENT OFFICER
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICER
Town Hall, 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Fax (631) 765-6145
Telephone (631) 765-1800
southoldtown.northfork.net
OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
To: Supervisor & Southold Town Board Members
Town Attorney Patricia Finnegan
Town Planner Valerie Scopaz
From: Town Clerk Elizabeth Neville
Re: Request for waiver on Moratorium
Date: August 18, 2004
Transmitted herewith is the request of Hamlet at Cutchogue by Patricia Moore, for a
waiver to the subdivision moratorium on property located at 78 School House Road,
Cutchogue, SCTM//1000-102-1-33.3. Please review and prepare a written report of your
recommendations and findings. Thank you.
PATRICIA C. MOORE
Attorney at Laxv
51020 Main Road
$outhold, New York l 1971
Tel: (63l) 765-4330
Fax: (631) 765-4643
RECEIVED
AUG 1 B 2004
Southohl Tow. Clerk
Honorable Josh Horton, Supervisor,
Members of the Southold Town Board
Main Road
Southold, NY 11971
and
August 18, 2004
Re: Request Waiver of Moratorium
Premises: Hamlet at Cutchogue
SCTM #1000-102-1-33.3
Dear Supervisor Horton and Members of the Board:
The Hamlet at Cutchogue on behalf of themselves and
the owner of the property Nocro Ltd. respectfully
requests that they be permitted to proceed with the
submission of a Smart Growth housing plan which
incorporates all the goals and objectives of the GEIS
adopted in 2003 and the proposed purposes articulated
for the Hamlet Study.
The parcel is located at 78 School House Road,
Cutchogue, Town of Southold. This property has been
historically recognized as being located in the Hamlet
of Cutchogue, on 46.16 acres, zoned ~Hamlet Density".
The applicant wishes to construct mixed residential
development which will include 137 single family homes
and 64 townhouse attached units designed around New
England style ~village greens" or parks. The
development will enjoy amenities such as a clubhouse
and pool, tennis courts, gazebos and walkways around
parks. The project is a model ~smart growth"
development which incorporates housing diversity with
the highest standard of design. Enclosed please find
the following:
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Site plan rendering of the proposed project
Site plan application
SEQRA Long Form EAF
The community plan seamlessly integrates income
diversity by designating a percentage of the units as
affordable: the proposed plan designs 137 clustered
single family homes, 64 townhouse condominium units,28
of the units would be designated as affordable units.
The development will be designed around multiple parks
providing open space, privacy and passive recreation.
There will be no difference in the design or
configuration between affordable and traditional non-
affordable units.
The plan is modeled after a nationally recognized
Nantucket project, which , upon completion, will be a
project of which both the owners and the Town can be
proud. Information regarding the Nantucket project is
set forth in Exhibit D.
The design is paramount to the success of the
project: the units are designed with New England
architecture which emphasizes Southold's heritage, The
architecture demands use of natural materials, picket
fences, cobble-stone paths, masonry chimneys and "green
architecture" (emphasizing energy conservation). The
success of this project is jeopardized by the endless
delay of successive moratoria.
This project will produce a positive economic
impact to the Hamlet of Cutchogue. The residential
density adjacent to the commercial centers in the
Hamlets support existing businesses and foster new
business and services in the hamlet. The condominium
development reduces demand of town services. The cost
of services is less then the demand. The project
maintains a private infrastructure, there is no demand
for highway improvements or maintenance. The design
encourages transportation networks which reduced
traffic impact on town roads. For those who can not
walk, this project intends to provide their own
transportation service to supermarket, shopping,
doctor, dry-cleaners, pharmacy, and regional centers.
HISTORY OF PARCEL
On July 19, 1983 the Town Board granted a change of
zone to 46.16 acres, from A-Residential to Article IV,
M-Light Multiple-Residential District which permitted
Condominium Multiple Dwelling Units. The owner
submitted an application for 201 homes attached in
cluster formation of 4 unit buildings and zero lot
lines.
In 1984 the Town started the SEQRA review, issued a
positive declaration and required the owner to prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement- He refused and
proceeded to Court to challenge the SEQRA
determination. Four years later, in 1988, the Court
ruled that the Town was not arbitrary and capricious in
requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement.
Thereafter, A Draft Environmental Impact Statement
was submitted in September 1989 specific to the
development of a multifamily use, and the SEQRA process
continued through 1991 when the Final EIS was being
prepared.
In 1989 the Town Board initiated the preparation of
a master plan and adopted the new Zoning Ordinance, the
development of the parcel for multiple family was
ratified and the parcel was zoned Hamlet Density (100-
40). The Zoning District Purposes states" the purpose
of the Hamlet Density (HD) Residential District is to
permit a mix of housing types and level of residential
density appropriate to the areas in and around the
major hamlet centers, particularly Mattituck,
Cutchogue, Southold, Orient and the Village of
Greenport.
In 1994 the Town of Southold commissioned a review
of Hamlet Density zoning in Southold Town. The stated
purpose of this Hamlet Study was to review the status
of each vacant property zoned for Hamlet Density. (The
study became the basis of a re-zoning in Greenport and
subsequent litigation) The subject property was
analyzed and determined to be in keeping with the goals
and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive or Master
Plan. The study further stated in support of the
appropriateness of the zoning that "Due to its location
just north of the hamlet's traditional center, this
parcel, when developed, is likely to strengthen the
hamlet". The Board ultimately adopted the findings of
the study which concluded that the property was
appropriately zoned Hamlet Density.
After years of studies, this parcel remains the
only HD zoned parcel in the Hamlet of Cutchogue. The
current Hamlet Study duplicates at great expense and
delay to property owners the work done only 10 years
ago. In January 2002 the principles of ~the Hamlet at
Cutchogue" entered into contract for the purchase of
the subject property. After initiating development
plans, the Moratorium was adopted and an application
could not be filed.
The zoning of this parcel is appropriate and in
accordance with the oft-repeated and adopted land use
goals of the Town. Therefore, we respectfully request
that the applicant be permitted to proceed with an
application and approval.
WAIVER OF MOP~ATORIUM
This project achieves the comprehensive planning
objectives of the Town of Southold:
The Preservation of Natural Resources: The plan
preserves open space through the use of village
greens. As a condominium development the units are
clustered with 0 lot lines, where appropriate, and
common areas.
2 o
Preservation of Open Space and Recreational space:
the property has been designated and planned for
development since 1983. This project creates Open
Space and Recreational space where none existed.
Both passive recreation and amenities such as a
swimming pool, tennis courts, and walking trails
provide recreational opportunities.
3 o
Preservation of Rural, Cultural, Commercial and
Historical Character of the Hamlets: This is the
primary objective of "The Hamlet at Cutchogue".
The design will model a planned New England style
village in architectural style and infrastructure.
The project design will emphasizes Southold's
heritage. The architecture demands use of natural
materials, picket fences, cobble-stone paths,
masonry chimneys and green architecture
(emphasizing energy conservation). The goals and
plan is compromised by the delay of moratorium.
The preservation of Farmland is not at issue. This
parcel has not been farmed in many years and has
been proposed for multifamily development since the
1980's. The parcel is properly zoned Hamlet
Density.
The Plan provides a housing type which supports the
Hamlet and does not place excessive demands on the
Community. The affordable units will seamlessly
integrate into the development. As a condominium
development the roads are private, the community is
located adjacent to existing stores, churches and
personal services therefore reducing the need for
vehicle use. The development will maintain a
private transportation service which will mitigate
traffic impact and promote transportation
efficiency. The project will provide for
recreational needs of the owners with a pool and
recreation center with such additional services as
may be desired by the community.
This project is designed and planned with "Smart
Growth" policies which emphasizes density in the
Hamlet which support and sustain continued economic
growth of the hamlet. This project also
voluntarily proposes inclusion of affordable units
among the standard units which provide socio-
economic diversity and balanced development. With
the Town's guidance this project could provide an
immediate need for affordable/work force housing·
Every study for the last 20 years has recognized
the concept of concentrating residential and
commercial uses in and around the exiting
traditional hamlet centers. The subject property
has been zoned for multiple family uses since 1983,
and in 1989 the Town on its own initiative as part
10.
11.
of a comprehensive re-zoning of the entire town
designated this property Hamlet Density (multiple
family uses). Moreover in 1994 the zoning was
ratified.
In the Town's most recent land use studies, the
Generic Environmental Impact Statement, examined
approximately 43 ~land use tools" all of which
recognized the fundamental principle that density
belongs in the Hamlets. Since 1983 this parcel has
been identified as being in the Hamlet.
The continuation of the Moratorium as it applies to
Hamlet development is no longer reasonable. After
two years of moratoria, the Hamlet Studies have
just now been initiated. There is not a single
proposal being contemplated that would alter the
fundamental appropriateness of the zoning of this
parcel. The Hamlet studies being initiated and the
HALO Zones are merely a refinement of prior
studies; the subject property has undergone
specific study and review in 1994 and the
development of this parcel under its existing
zoning is justified and should not be delayed for
the sake of process.
During the twenty-four months of moratorium this
property has been rendered useless. The HD zone
only permits residential development, no use, other
than one single family dwelling on 46 acres could
be developed during the moratorium.
The stated rationale for two years of Moratorium
was to achieve the following stated goals: [a] To
preserve land including farmland, open space and
recreational landscapes; [b] To preserve the rural,
cultural and historic character of the hamlets and
surrounding countryside; [c] To preserve the Town's
remaining natural environment; to prevent further
deterioration of the Town's natural resources and
to restore the Town's degraded natural resources
back to their previous quality; [d] To preserve and
promote a range of housing and business
opportunities that support a socio-economically
diverse community; and [e] To increase
transportation efficiency and to create attractive
12.
13.
alternatives to automobile travel, while preserving
the scenic and historic attributes of roadways in
the Town.~
It is outrageous to delay review of this project in
order to await recommendations of "Resident
Stakeholders", community volunteers, to give input
to the needs of the Hamlets and application of
Smart Growth concepts. Multiple studies prepared
over the last 20 years costing the Town hundreds of
thousands of dollars have already analyzed the
needs of the community and the conclusion that
housing density belongs in the Hamlet. This
project already offers to design using the
principles of ~Smart Growth". Several valuable
months would be wasted2 while the Town reviews
recommendations that are already obvious and have
been confronting the Town for the last 20 years.
Any recommendations which are not included in the
original submission can be added as the dialogue
between the Town, the Hamlet Study Groups, and the
applicant continues with the anticipated months of
administrative review.
The applicant (through their attorney or agent)
hereby respectfully requests to be designated a
~Resident Stakeholder" for Cutchogue hamlet as he
is an interested party to the land use decisions
affecting his property. The applicant, through
their attorney-agent has been denied membership to
the group. ~Stakeholder/Freeholder" historically in
the history of Southold did not exclude the
landowner directly affected. The applicant will
participate in the Hamlet Studies and accept
reasonable recommendations which improve the
project and benefit the Town. Certainly the
planning office has control over the evolution of
the project. As the ~more senior" members of the
~ Southold Comprehensive Implementation Strategy Generic
EIS page S-4 (2003)
2 In addition to the two years already wasted while this
parcel, lying in the hamlet of Cutchogue, has been rendered
sterile.
Town Board will recall, the farmers [whether they
owned land or not] were ~'brought to the table" in
the Blue Ribbon Commission to hear their point of
view. The developer-contract vendee of the only HD
parcel in the hamlet of Cutchogue certainly should
be invited to a seat at the table as well.
Therefore, the applicant respectfully request that
they be permitted to proceed with a ~smart growth"
model project consisting of a site plan and special
permit for 137 clustered single family homes, 64
townhouse condominium units of which 28 units will be
designated affordable units situated around multiple
parks.
Thank you in advance for your anticipated
consideration.
Patricia C. Moore
cc: The Hamlet at Cutchogue, LLC
Nocro Ltd.
' P'~I.,ANNING BOARD M]EMBERS
BENNETT ORLOWSKI, JR.
Chairman
RICHARD CAGGIANO
WIS,L~4a~I J. CREMEtLS
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
MARTIN H. SIDOR
PLANNING BOARD OFFICE
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
P.O. Box.1179
Town Hall, 53095 State Route 25
Southold, New York 11-971-0959
Telephone (631) 76/5-1938
Fax (631) 765-3136
Date Received
Date Completed
Filing Fee
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN
x New
Change of Use
Re-use - -'
Extension
Revision of Approved Site Plan
The Hamlet at Cutchogue
Name of Business or Site:
SCTM#:
1000.102-01-33~3
78 School House Road
Cutchogue'~ NY
631-493-0534
Seacroft, Ltd.
Patricia C. Moore'Esq.
Location:
Address:
Name of APplicant:
Address of Applicant:
Telephone:
Owner of Lar~d:
Agent or Person responsible
for appllca~:lon:
Address:', ..?
Telephone:
Site plans prepared by:
tlcer{se No.
Address:
Telephone:
The Hamlet at Cutchogue,LLC c/o Charles Kuehn
3 East Deer Park Road, Suite 201Dix Hills, NY 11746
51020 Main Road, Southold NY 11971
631-765-4330
Charles Kuehn Architect
above
/
The Hamlet ~ Cutchogue
Environmental Assessment Form
Project Description
The proposed project site is located at 78 School House Road, Cutchogue, Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The site can be more clearly defined as Suffolk
County Tax Map Number 1000-102-01-33.3. The property is currently zoned HD-
Hamlet Density Residential. The property is fallow farmland.
The proposed project involves the construction of a mixed residential development. The
development will include 137 single-family residential homes and 64 townhouses.
Amenities including a clubhouse, tennis courts, gazeboes, walkways, internal roadways
and surface water features are proposed for the development. A sewage treatment plant
is proposed to handle the sanitary wastewater generated by the development. Access to
the site xvill be provided from the comer of School House Lane and Griffing Road.
Page 2
Planning Board Site Plan Application
APPUCANPS AI~DAVIT
:'STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNIY OF SUFFOLK
Jeff Rimland
1721~D N6rth, O~ean Avemue;;Mmd~o~lNY, ~11763
does business
being duly sworn, deposes and says that hefc. mJ~ aL
in the State of New York, and that he Is the owner of the. above property, or that he is the
member Of the The Hamlet at Cutchosue
(Title) (Specify whether Partnership or Corp.)
which Is hereby making application; that there are no existing structures or Improvements on the land
which are not shown on the Site Plan; that the UUe to the enUre parcel, Including all rights-of-way, has
been clearly established and Is shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed
plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads;'that he has examined all rules and
regulaUons adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the
plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed In any manner without the approval of the
Planning Board; and that the actual physical Improvements will be Installed in strict accordance with the
plans submitted,
~ The Hamle, t ~at Cutchogue, LLC
(0' r) ' ,
Signed
(Pa
~e~'f Rimland, membe~
Sworn to me this
/~' day of ,-~-Z2"
Nbt~+~f'Pdbllc) /
14-16-2 (2/87)-7c SEQR
617.21
Appendix A
State Environmental Qualit~ Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Puroose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner,
whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant s
not always easy .to answer. Frequently, there are aspects of a project that, are su/Sjective or
~_nomxxe,~.s~urea_b?.i_lt Is o:lso understooO t,hat tho, se. w,h,o determine significance ma), ha,,e little or no formal
vato tetxge ot me environment or may oe tecnnlcany expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many
who have knowledge in one particfi ar area may not be aware of the broader' concern affecting the
question of significance.
d The. full EAF is inte,nde,d to prox:ide, a method whereby, applicants and agencies can be assured that the
eternnnatlon p. rocess nas oeen oroerly, comprehensive m nature, vet flexible to allow introduction of
infbrmation to t~t a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full E.M: is comprised of three parts.
~aart 1: provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying
sic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that tab:es place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action.
[t provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to~oe considerett small to moderate or whether it
is a potentially-large impact. The form arso identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is, identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate
whether or nor the impact is actuall) important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE - TYPE I .aND UNLISTED ACTIONS
Identify the Portions of E~4F completed for this project: X Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 9 and 3 fanr~ronriate~ and an,-'
uppomng mformatton, and considering both the magnitude and importance of eac[4 impactt, it is
reasonably determined by the lead agency that:
__A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which
will no! have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will
be prepared.
B. Although the project could have a s gnificant effect on the environment, there will not be a
-- significant effdct Yor this Unlisted Actton because the mitigation measures described in PART 3
have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that ma,,' have a significant
-- impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration wall be prepared.
*A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
The Hamlet at Cutchogue
Name of Action
Town of Southold Planning Board
Name of Lead Agency
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency
Signature of Preparer
If different from responsible officer)
Date
PART I - PROJECT INFORMAR~N
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOT,rE: Theirs document is .designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a
s.~gmhcant 9r~ect .o.n ~the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to
mese quesnons ~vm oe considered as part of t~he application for approval and may be subject to further
verification and public review. Provide an) ad~htional information you believe will 'be needed to
complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that c~mpletion of the full E.AI~. will be devendent on information currently available and
will not involve ne~x studies research or mestigation. If information requiring such additional work is
unavailable, so indicate and Specify each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
The Hamlet ,4t Cutchogue
LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
78 Schoolhonse Road, Cutchogue, Town of Southold
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Charles Kuehn 631-493-0534
ADDRESS
3 East Deer Park Road, Suite 201
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Dix Hills NY 11746
NAIVlE OF O~rNER (If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Nocro Ltd.
.~DDRESS
Main Road
CITY.,PO STATE ZIP CODE
Cutchogue NY 11930
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION See Attached
Please Complete Each ~uestion - Indicate i~.A. if not applicable
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use:
Urban Industrial Conm~ercial Residential (Suburban)
Rural (non-farm) Forest X Agriculture (Former)
Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 46.16 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Bmshland (Non-agricultural) 46.16 acres 0.0 acres
Forested acres acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc. I acres acres
Wetland (Freshwater or Tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres
Water Surface .&rea acres -+0.59 acres
Unvegetated {Rock, earth or fill) acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0.0 acres -+26.07 acres
Other (Indicate type) Landscaped 0.0 acres .-+19.50 acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? HaA-Haven Loam~ 0-3% slope, PIC-P1},tnouth
Loamy, Sand. 8-15% slope & RdB-Riverhead Sand}, Loam, 3-8% slope
a. Soil drainage: X Well drained 100 % of site; Moderately well drained % of site:
Poor drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1
through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? .-+15 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcropping on project site? Yes X No
2
The Hamlet ~ Cutchogue
Environmental Assessment Form
Project Description
The proposed project site is located at 78 School House Road, Cutchogue, Town of
Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The site can be more clearly defined as Suffolk
County Tax Map Number 1000-102-01-33.3. The property is currently zoned HD-
Hamlet Density Residential. The property is fallow farmland.
The proposed project involves the construction of a mixed residential development. The
development will include 137 single-family residential homes and 64 townhouses.
Amenities including a clubhouse, tennis courts, gazeboes, walkways, internal roadways
and surface water features are proposed for the development. A sewage treatment plant
is proposed to handle the sanitary waste~vater generated by the development. Access to
the site will be provided from the comer of School House Lane and Griffing Road.
a. What is depth to be-"~ock? NA . (in feet)
%5' Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: X 0-I0% 100 %; __ 10-15%
15% or greater °/i,
6. Is project substantially conti~uous to,, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the
National Registers of Histori~ Places ? Yes X No
7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks?
__ Yes X Nb
8. What is the depth of the water table? 25-$0 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? X Yes __ No
10.Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes X No
Il.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or
endangered2 Yes X No According to
Identify each species
12.Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site.'? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological
tbrmations) __ Yes X No Describe
13.Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation
area? Yes X No If yes, explain
14.Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
Yes X No
15.Streams within or contiguous to project area N/A
a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: No
a. Name . Size (In Acres)
17.Is the site served by existing public utilities'?__ Yes X No (Utilities itt immediate area)
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection'? __ Yes No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow' connection? __ Yes No
18.Is the site located in an agricultural district certifiedpursuant to Agncuhure and Markets Law, Article
25-.&& Section 303 and 304? Yes X N'o
19. Is the site located in or substantially conti~uous to a Critical Environmental ,&rea designated pursuant
to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 Yes X No
20.Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Yes X No
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 46.16 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed .-+46.16 acres initially; .-+46.16 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0.0 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: N/A (if appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed N/A %
f. Number of oft-street parking spaces existing 0 ; proposed 39
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 190' (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and ,type of housing units: NA *Saturday Peak Hour Total
One Family Two Family Muhiple Family Condominium
Initially 137 64
Ultimately 137 64
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 2Stories height; .-+114 width; ~$4 length.
(ClubhousO
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project wi cup)' is? .-+30 ft. (SchoolHouse
Lane)
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site?
Unknown at this time cubic yards.
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed?
a. Ifyes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? X Yes
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? X Yes
4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground
site? ±46.16 acres.
X Yes No __ N/A
£andscaping/tur£
No
No
covers) will be removed from
5. Will an~v mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this
project': __ Yes X No
6. Ifsinele phase project: Anticipated period of construction 18-24~ months, (including
demolition).
7. If multi-phased: N/A
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number).
b. Anticipated date ofcommencementphase 1 __month__
c. Approximate completion date of final phase __ month __
d. Is phase l functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8. Will blasting occur during construction'?
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction
10.Number of jobs eliminated by this project __0.
year (including demolition).
year.
Yes No
Yes X No
~60 ; after project is complete ±5
11.Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
If yes, explain
Yes X No
12. Is surtrhce liquid waste disposal involved? Yes X No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13.Is subsurthce liquid waste disposal involved? Yes X No Type
14.Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
If yes, explain:
Yes
X No
15.Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain'? __ Yes X No
16.Will the project generate solid waste? X Yes No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month ±16.64 tons.
(Based on 2.3 lbs/capita-assuming 2.4 occupants per dwelling)
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facili.ty be used? X Yes No
c. If yes, give name Town of Southold Resource Recover}, Fac#itt,
location N/S off'Middle Countt3, Road & W/O Cox Lane
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
e. If yes, explain
Yes X No
17.Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Yes X No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years.
1 &Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X No
19.Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes
20.Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
4
X No
Yes X No
2 l.Will project result in an increase in energy use'? X Yes __ No
If yes, indicate type(s) Fossil fuels/electricio.
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute.
23.Total anticipated water usage per day .-+60,300gallons~day. (Based on 300GPD/Dwelling)
24.Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding?
If yes, explain
Yes X No
25.Approvals Required:
City, Toxxm, Village Board Yes
City, Town. Village Planning Board X Yes
X No
No
CID', Town Zoning Board X Yes No
CID', Coun.ty Health Department X Yes No
Other Local Agencies Yes No
State Agencies DEC X Yes X No
Other Regional Agencies Yes X No
Federal Agencies Yes ~ No
C. ZONING AND PLANNING INFORMATION
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision'? __
If yes, indicate decision required:
Type Submittal Date
Subdivisiou/Site August 2004
Platt
Special Exceptiou Pendiug
Sanitary/Water Pending
Pending
SPDES Pending
X Yes __ No
zoning amendment __ zoning variance X special use permit X subdivision ~X site plan
new/revision of master plan resource management plan other
2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? HD-Hamlet Densit}, Residential
3. What?is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present
z°ning~o, ooOSf mt~rimum lot si~e, 25% maximum lot coverage
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? N/A
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed
zoning? N/A
6. Is the l>roposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
X Yes No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classit~catmns within a 1,4 mile radms of proposed
action? Commercial, resideutial~ agriculture; A-C-Agricultural Conservatioo~ R-80 & R-40
Resideottal, HlI-Hamlet l~ustness
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoinings'surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? XYes
NO --
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how man), lots are proposed? N/A
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10.Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts'?
X Yes No
1 i. Will the proposed action create a demand for an), community provided setwices (recreation, education,
police, fire protection)?. X Yes No
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? X Yes No
12.Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?
Yes X No
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Yes No
D. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any
adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which
you propose to mitigate or avoid tl~em.
E. VERIFICATION
I certify that the infbrmation provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Marissa Da Breo Date 8/13/04
Signature "(.._~ ~.~ Title EnvironmentalAnal},st
l~efothe action is itt the Coastal Area, attd you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form
re proceeding with this assessment.
Sun l mary Df Trap GeneratlDn Calsulation
F~r 64 Dwe!l=nq Units of Resleenuiml Condominium ' Tewnhouse
July 16, 2004
Average Standard Ad]us~menE Drivewav
Rate Deviation Eactzr Volume
Aug. Weekiay 2-Way Vclume 6.86 0.00 1.00 429
~-9 ~4 Peak Hour Enuer
~-9 ~.I Peak Hour Exit
7-9 AP! Peak Hour Total
4-6 PM Peak Hour Enmer
4-6 PM Peak Hour ExLt
4-6 PM Peak Hour Tonal
Saturday 2-Way Vclume
0.10 0.00 1.00 6
0.4~ 0.00 1.00 30
,9.56 0.00 1.00 ~6
0.44 0.00 1.00 28
0.21 0.00 !.00 14
0.6f 0.00 1.00 42
10.21 0.00 1. n0 ~-~
Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.5£ 0.00
Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.44 0.00
Sa~uriay Peak Hour Total 0.96 0.00
Summary of Trip Generation Calculation
Fzr 13~ Dweltin~ Uni[s .of Single Family 5etaohed Housin~
August 12, 2004
Average Standard Adjustment Dri~e~al
Rate Deviation Factor Volume
Av~. Weekda-, 2-~ay Volume 9.57 2.69 1.00 1311
7-9 ~.I Peak Hour Enter
7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit
u-9 ~.~ Peak Hour Total
4-6 PM Peak Hcur Enter
4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit
4-6 PM Peak Hour Total
Saturda] 2-Wa5 Volume
0.19 0.00 1.00 26
0.56 0.,}0 1.00 ~?
0.75 0.90 1.00 103
0.64 0.00 1.00 58
0.37 0.00 1.00 ~l
1.01 1.05 1.00 138
10.i0 3.68 1.00 1384
Sauurday Peak Hour Enter 0.51 0.00
Saturda5 Peak Hour Exit ,3.~3 0.00
Sa~urtay Peak Ho~xr Total 0.94 0.99
1. O0 7 ,J
i. 00 b9
1.00 129
Nose: A zero indicates no data availaOle.
Source: InstzEute .Df Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation, 7~n £di~ion, 26,03.
TRIP GENEP-ATION BY MICROTPANS
Nantucket Rentals - Prestigiou{~xvards the Nantucket village Nashaquisset has won Page ! of 1
Thoughtfully designed by a team of talented designers and architects, the houses of Nashaqui.~
national recognition for the charm and quality of their design. Our prestigious awards include:
The Builder's Choice Award (National)
For outstanding design and planning: Merit Awards for Best
Community Design and Best Single Family Home Design. (The
only community in the nation to receive two awards in this
prestig~oas competition.)
The Best in American Living Award (National)
presented by the National Association of Home Builders.
The Target Award (National)
Grand Award for excellence
The MIRM Awards (National)
Gold and Silver Awards for outstanding design and furnishing.
The PRISM Awards (Massachussets)
Grand Award for Project of the Year;
Gold Award for Best Single Family Home.
http://www.nashaquisset.com/tour/awards.html 10/29/03
Nantucket Rentals - Take a rill tour of the quaint Nantucket village~shaquisset
Page 1 of 2
'I :)Ltl
Click Phot,
In the heart of Nantucket Island lies the extraordinary village of Nashaquisset, a resort commur'
winning summer homes and cottages. Within walking distance of Main Street and only a short [
Surfside Beach, these charming, privately-owned houses are among the finest vacation rentals
Nantucket. With classic island design, light and airy interiors and distinctive furnishings, we stri~
Nashaquisset rental home the perfect spot for a memorable family vacation.
Each house and cottage is exquisitely landscaped, including an intimate garden, a private patio
shower. Your comfortable and well-maintained home comes fully-equipped - right down to the
and wine glasses.
As a guest of NashaquisseL you'll enjoy pnvate tenms Courts and a beautiful swimming pool wi
sundeck and changing fac¢ities. Our professional caretakers rnaintain Nashaqmsset's lush groL
secluded gardens, and a full time rental staff is available to help assure you a pleasant stay.
We look forward to having you as our guest!
hnp://w;xav.nashaquisset.com/tour/index.html 10/29/03
OUTONOGUE, NEW YOE'K
4raw. b~ll
SITD
200
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
UNITS
C.W.KU~NN