Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
TR-474
01-26-2002 10: 12PM FROM ORIENT COUNTRY STORE LTD. TO 76S1355 P.01 Tawas Hall Alberl�J.t4�peki,PleoideaC �1{r SSM Route 26 Jame 1tS1iB.'Vlce•Preaideat P.O. B"1179 H*nty BMW% ® Southold,NeW York 1I971-0969 gs}Sa Fo~ N j Ke,k Poliwo" � +$ �' T®lpphrne(88t1?65�•1887 Paz(831)?W-1366 i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTM i TOWN OF80VTx()LD Jung 22�2001 I J.Hcvi McL8u&VA Esq. P.c .bq%.4210 . " 2 6 200' sou&*14ter 11971 RFE 0"WA1tI:' CO. i Ili i � Delia Mr.McLsusMn: O>11 a r2 mtificid inwoction,tbe'Bosrd notioed that the un-Pem+itted shed rcmains in its wi&d Plgase keloeate or ke:tnetve the shred wit[tin 30 days. _ Ttlbnk�wu. � I�etiJ.KrttPsydof (� I Board of'httstees � A I� TOTRL P.al i • Albert J. Krupski, President g�FFU(4CO Town Hall James King,Vice-President ��0 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith h� G'y� P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster o Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda y x `�' � ' Telephone i631i 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 22, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. P.O. Box 1210 Southold, NY 11971 RE: ORIENT WHARF CO. Dear Mr. McLaughlin: On a recent field inspection, the Board noticed that the un-permitted shed remains in its original location. Please relocate or remove the shed within 30 days. hank vou. Very tzuby yours, r" Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:ims J.KMN MCLAUCNLIN Attorney-At Lm Winds Way Professional Center 44020C Rt.48,P.O. Box 1210 Southold,New York 11971 Telephone(631)765.6085 Facsimile(631)765-1856 June 8, 2001 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 20�I Southold, NY 11971 JUN Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: Please be advised that my client is awaiting a written approval from the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation regarding the piling work approved by you at your April, 2001 meeting. It is our understanding that the DEC is scheduling a meeting with the contractor in order to clarify the exact work being contemplated.As a result, my client probably will not be able to undertake this work until the fall. Very ru y s, J. K in Ibert J. Krupski, President r FF19 Ir James King, Vice-President � Q 4QG • Town Hall Henry Smith �y 9G 53095 Route 25 Artie Foster P.O. Box 1179 Ken Poliwoda y Z� Southold, New York 11971-0959 0 � 'yiff • Qt��q Telephone(631) 765-1892 Ol �aif Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 25, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin. Esq. PO Box 1210 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Southold Town Board of Trustees will put a time limit on the permitted activity, granted at our April Meeting. Please contact us to discuss a time frame. Thank you. Very truly yours, / Albert Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:cjc 05/04/2001 15:22 631765#6 KEVIN MCLAUGHj6 PAGE 01 L XN NIOLMNLM A1tMney At Law Winds Way Prafasional Carta 44020C IU.48,P.O.Box 1210 Southold,New York 11971 Tekphorm(63l)7654"S Fxsimile(63 )765 [856 May 7, 2001 Board of Town Trustees MAY - Q Town of Southold Fox No. 766-1368 Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: At the meeting held on April 25, 2001 there were two issues before you: 1) a Coastal Erosion Permit Application for the shed enclosing the water treatment filters; and 2)a Welland Permit Application for an Amendment to Permit 0474 to remove, relocate and install certain pilings. After length discussion it was the clear decision of the Board of Trustees that the Amendment to Permit 9474 regarding the piling was granted, and a separate decision that the existing shed must be removed from its present location. If and only if,the applicant Wished to rel a the existinfl shad to a location behind the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line, the applicant was directed to file an amended plan showing the proposed location of the shed. At no time was there ever any indication that these two applications were linked, or that in order to obtain the Amendment to Permit 0474 the applicant must file an amended plan to relocate the existing shed to a new location. In feet, the applicant has no present intention of relocating the shed to a position below the Coastal Erosion Hazard Line. However, the applicant plans to Immediately begin the process of removing, relocating and installing certain piling pursuant to the plan already on file with the Trustees. Please immediately issue an Amendment to Permit#474 allowing my clients to begin the piling work, which has been approved by the Town Trustees. ve yours, I L OL - MUSA Albert J. Krupski, President �Q$UFFO(�C Town Hall James King,Vice-President �.t.� %� 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith o= P.O. Box 1179 Artie Foster W x Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Telephone k631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 4, 2001 Ms. Susan Long O.E.L. Permits P.O. Box 46 East Marion, NY 11939-0046 Re: ORIENT WHARF CO. 2110 Village Lane, Orient SCTM#24-2-28.1 Dear Ms. Long: The following action was taken at the Southold Town Board of Trustees meeting held on W-dnesday, April 25, 2001: KFSOLVED, that the Southold Town Board of Trustees Apprm c :he request ibr an .% nendment to 'ertnit 4474 to remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier ind relocate to north side of solid store/rock pier. Install approx. 34 pilings on south side of existing solid ;,:one/rock pier. This is not a determination from any other agcnry. Ili,rou have any questions, please call our office at (631) 765-1 892. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:Ims DEC Albert J. Krupski, President ��SgFF0(,rc Town Hall James King,Vice-President .j� �l/ 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith a y� P.O. Box 1179 Artie Foster y Z Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Telephone(631) 765.1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT Date: May 4, 2001 SCTM#24-2-28.1 Name of Applicant/Agent: S.E.L. Permits Name of Permittee: ORIENT WHARF CO., Attention: Linton Duell Address of Permittee: P.O. Box 243, Orient,NY 11957 Property Located: 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY 11957 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY: Remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier and relocate to north side of solid stone/rock pier. Install approximately 84 pilings on south side of existing solid stone/rock pier. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: ;apply if marked) _Bluff restoration through a re-vcgetatior.plan is a necessary special condition of this permit. A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this permit. _A maintenance agreement is attached with application and is a necessary special condition of this permit. Albert J. Krupski, Jr. 1 President, Board of Trustees AJK/Ims cc: DEC i�oS�e�otK�oG � ►� Town Hall. 53095 Main Road 0 cn � P.O. Box 1179 . O� Southold. New York 11971 Telephone (631) 765-1892 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Monday, April 16, 2001, the following recommendation was made: Moved by Bob Ghosio, seconded by Scott Hilary, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the Amendment Request to Permit#474 and Coastal Erosion Permit Application of ORIENT WHARF CO. 24-2-28.1 for the existing 6'X 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf as long as the filtration system is required to obtain a safe water supply, and to remove 54 pilings from west side of timber pier and relocate to north side of solid stone/rock pier. Install approx. 84 pilings on south side of existing solid stone/rock pier. 2110 Village Lane, Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion Carried L WIN MCUWGNUN Attomec At Law Winds Way Professional Center 44020C Rt.48,P.O.Box 1210 Southol New York Telephone(63 L)765-6085 11971 Facsimile(631)765-1856 March 19, 2001 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Co. Gentlemen: I have enclosed the original and two copies of the Coastal Erosion Permit Application and Environmental Assessment Form, Transaction Disclosure Form and survey in the above- referenced matter, along with my check in the sum of$50.00 for this minor project. Please schedule this application for your next available date. Ve y ur cl-aughlin Encs. Hand Delivered �OgpFFO(,�c JEAN W. COCHRAN GREGORY F. YAKABOSKI .r0 Q(� Supervisor TOWN ATTORNEY Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 N y. � P.O. Box 1179 MARY C. WILSON �,y F Southold, New York 11971-0959 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY Q! y ��� Telephone (631) 765-1889 ? Fax(631) 765-1823 E-mail: townattorneyasouthold.org OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD February 28, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. Winds Way Professional Center 44020C Rte. 48 P.O. Box 1210 FS 2 8 211 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: I am writing you in regards to the issue of whether or not the Orient Wharf Company must make an application for a Coastal Erosion Permit under Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code. It is the Trustee's position that the water filtration system and shed enclosure are "regulated activities"as per Chapter 37. The Trustees do not support the contention that the structure in question is part of the wharf structure and an "unregulated activity". Therefore, a Coastal Erosion permit application should be made by your client. Please feel free to contact our office if there are any questions. Sincerely, Ma C :sfn Assistant Town Attorney cc: Albert J. Krupski, President, Board of Town Trustees 0J21i 2001 09: 32 8317n51856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 i • 1.am MOMONUN Amy At Law Winds way ProfewiMW Ce*ner 44020C Itt.48.P.O.Box 1210 Southold,New York 11971 Telaphone(631)765-6085 Facsimile(631)765-1856 February 21, 2001 Southold Town Trustees Fax No. 765-1366 FEB 2 Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: Transmitted hereby is my latest correspondence with the Southold Town Attorney's Office,to which I have not received a response. As a result, request is hereby made that the above-referenced matter be adjourned to your next schedule meeting. Please advise me In writing of the date thereof. Ve y u J. n Enc. 02/21I'2801 79: 32 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN FA,E a2 _L IMN MGLUINNUN Attorttcy At Law wind,way Ptofmatonal Center 44020C Rt.49,P.O.Box 1210 southold,Naw York 11971 Telepbone(631)765-6095 Facairmic(631)765.1956 February 15, 2001 Once of the Southold Town Attorney Attn, Gregory F. Yakaboski, Esq. Southold Town Hall FEB 2 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company with Southold Town Trustees Dear Mr. Yokaboski: Pursuant to our recent telephone conversation, you were to review the necessity for a Coastal Erosion Permit for the temporary shed situate on the Orient Wharf. I have hold off filing a formal application for a Coastal Erosion Permit with the Southold Town Trustees pending your response. As I have advised you, the subject shed Is temporary in nature. We have always agreed that the shed will be removed as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department has advised us that the water filtration system housed In said shed is no longer needed. Pursuant to Mary Wilson's letter dated December 20, 2000, it is our position that the shed is located within the "structural hazard area" and, therefore, is permitted, as it is a movable structure. Again, the shed is located on the wharf, which has existed at this site for over 100 years. Additionally, if this shed is deemed to require a Coastal Erosion Permit, there are literally hundreds of other structures within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area that must be held to the some standard. Please contact me upon receipt of this letter, so that we can discuss this matter. V tru you , J. e a cc: Orient Wharf Company . ,�_ ,4 �� f , O �'t� � �p J'" ��j ��� Albert J. Krupski, President • �gUFFO(q 'A Town Hall James King,Vice-President h.1.0� �Gy 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith C P.O.Box 1179 Artie Foster W Southold,New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda Gy �`� Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 26, 2001 Orient Wharf Co. 2110 Village Lane Orient, NY 11957 Attention: Mr. Linton Duell Dear Mr. Duell: The Orient Wharf Co. is in violation of Town Code, Chapter 37-Coastal Erosion.. The Orient Wharf Co. must apply for a permit within the time allowed, which would be by February 1, 2001, in order to be placed on the regular February meeting of the Southold Board of Trustees. . Sincerely, Albert J. KApski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:cjc CC: Monsanto/Perry Salvadorini Application Attached F�1 't2J2901 15: 59 E317651956 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE Fit L R MI NGL�LIM Attorney At law Words Way Professional Center 44020C RL 48,P.O.Box 1210 Southold,New York 11971 Prone(631)765.6N5 Fox(631)765-1956 January 23, 2001 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Attn. Albert J. Krupski, Jr., President P.O. Box 1179 JAN 2 q Southold, New York 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. Krupski: I am in receipt of your facsimile transmission to me of this date. Enclosed herewith is another copy of the transmittal letter of T.M. Martin of the Water Quality Unit of the Suffolk County Department of Hearth Services. Clearly, the removal of the filtration system and the shed housing the same would be premature at this point. While the latest water sample results show Alachlor just below the MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level), the Department of Health Services wants to resample the water supply when the same Is reactivated in the spring. We have agreed to the removal of the shed and the filtration system when, and only when,the county authorizes such removal. Please review my letter to you dated June 23, 2000 wherein I state: "Again, the applicant will remove the filtration system and shed, as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department determines that the water supply is safe."To prematurely remove the filtration system without county approval, and thereby expose a large number of people to a potentially dangerous water supply seems irresponsible at best, and could result in potential liability on behalf of the Orient Wharf Company and/or the Orient Yacht Club. Ve y y u , J. K cc: T.M. Martin, Water Quality Unit Orient Wharf Company 01: _� 20t11 15: 5R 6317551E5 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN• PAGE P_ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK D JAN 2 4 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY RUPIPOLK COUNTY E=CUT1v8 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. 15Nov00 coaatrsstoxcx Orient Yacht Club Attn: Mr Linton Duell Village Lane Orient, N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: The latest results of water samples collected on 19Sep00 from the system serving the Yacht Club have been completed by the Health Laboratory. All the results have been forwarded to the Data Unit where they will be inputted and a printout will be forwarded to you when available. A synopsis of the results are as follows. The raw (untreated) water contained 1.8 ppb of the herbicide Alachlor just below the MCL(Maximum Contaminant Level) set by both Federal and State Health agencies. In addition the metabolites(breakdown)products of this herbicide OA and ESA were detected at 1.48 and 2,59. Currently the New York State Health Department sets a 50 ppb MCL on these UOC's (Unspecified Organic Contaminants) while they are under toxological review. Lastly traces (1 ppb) of the gasoline additive MT13E (Methyl tertiary butyl ether) was found in the raw water. None of these contaminants were detected in the filtered water. When these samples were collected 40,900 gallons of treated water had passed through the meter serving the carbon units. This Department will sample the Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in the Spring of 2001 to determine if the filters will be necessary next season. As a result of the findings at the Yacht Club an extensive survey of water quality in the Hamlet of Orient is underway. Preliminary results show widespread contamination,with a number of herbicides and there metabolites as well as MTBE. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call 852-1906. Please excuse the delays in reporting these results but each sample is being examined for over 200 contaminants and the current turn-around time at the lab is about twelve weeks. Truly yours, T.M. Martin Watcr Quality Unit cc: Town Trustees Culligan .1IMSION OF ENVrRONKENTAL QUALrrY• DRSNK ING WATER BUREAU-RNERHEAD COUNTY CENTER • RIVERI$AD NY I I901-3397 Phone(631)952-190S Fu(631)IS2.2743 01/23/2001 14: 00 6317651856 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 Attorney At Law Win&W8yPrdeedi0116l Crater 44020C RL 48,P.O.Bon 1210 Soathol4.hlm Y.ock J197.1 PMne(631)765G095 Fax(631)765-1936 January 23, 2001 Board dfTrustees Town of Southold fax No.755.1366 Re: orient Whart Company JAN 2 3 Gentlemen: My client has just advised me,that they are scheduled for your meeting on January 24, 2001. My last correspondence With you was mylefter dated Novefter 29, 2000 wherein I requested that this matter be adjourned until your May, 2001 meeting, so that additional water potWiity tests could be conducted'by the Suffolk County Department df'Health Services.The water system has been winterized,thereby necessitating such an adjournment. HaVing heard nothing further,'I assumed that the adjoumment'had been granted. Unfortunately, I have a prior commitment for tomorrow, and must therefore request an adjournment until your February, 2001 meeting.'Kindly advise mein writing regarding the adjourned date. As I believe you are aware, my client is currently working With DEC to rectify any outstanding Issues of concern to that agency. My client is equally interested in resolving any issue With your agency, and vlilll'be happy to worknn conjunction With you to accomplish that result. I am in the process of obtaining a new survey with the Coastal Erosion line included thereon, so that an application for a Coastal Erosion Pern11t can-be tiled,.tt required. According to the letter of Mary C. Wilson to your agency dated December 20, 2000. it is uncertain whether such a permit is required. e t yo n cc: Odent'Wharf Company Albert J. Krupski, President • ��$�FFO��('C • Town Hall James King,Vice-President 53095 Route 25 Henry Smith o= P.O.Box 1179 Z Southold,New York 11971-0959 Artie Foster y Ken Poliwoda Oy Telephone(631) 765.1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD January 23, 2001 J. Kevin McLaughlin Attorney at Law 44020C Route 48 P.O. Box 1210 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The Southold Town Board of Trustees has reviewed the data and letter from the Suffolk County Health Dept. The test results show the water to be safe under current County standards and testing capabilities. Your letter of June 23, 2000 states that the applicant, Orient Wharf Co., will remove the filtration system and shed. The Board waited for the new water tests, which indicate good water quality, and now expect the Orient Wharf Co. to abide by it's agreement to remove the shed and filtration system immediately. In the future, any activity on the Wharf must receive a Wetland Permit from this Board under Chapter 97, as well as a Coastal Erosion Permit, under Chapter 37. Failure to comply with either code will result in enforcement action. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:Ims VIA FAX & MAIL amoumv at Rmu Whu(#wag.Twpoa on d em, 44020e Ste.48,9.6.2=1210 Soudidd,.New Vmk 11971 got N&(631)765-6085 9aa No.(631)765-1856 November 29, 2000 Board of Town Trustees r Town of Southold Feather Hill Complex Southold, NY 11971 NOV 3 Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Martin's letter dated November 15 , 2000 regarding the water quality for the water system servicing the dock and the Orient Yacht Club. As you can see, the Department of Health Services wants to re-sample the water in the spring of 2001 , when the water system is reactivated. Therefore, request is hereby made that this matter be adjourned until at least May, 2001 to allow the re-testing of the water. I have also been advised that there may be an issue regarding a Coastal Erosion Permit requirement. Please be advised that the Orient Wharf Company is ready and willing to file for such a permit should one be determined to be require Ve y ur J. v cLaughlin Enc. Hand Delivered ` COLNTY OF SUFFOLK I Oo'*' f n- ROBERT J. G:kF'FNEY- SL'FFOLK COT-""r7'i...xECLn`n-: DEP_A-R=FNT OF HMALTH 5ER%`ICFS L.�pQvj1�$IU\ER Dear Mr Duell: The latest results of,.t ater samples collected on 19Sep00 from the s;stem sen frig the adht Club have been completed 'c}' the Health Labortt.tor . .ill the results have been forwarded to the Data t mt •,viiere they 'viil 'oe inputted and a printout will be fonvarded to you when available A synopsis of the results are as follows. The raw (untreated) water contained I.S ppb of the herbicide �lz hlor lust below the biCL IAiaximum Contaminant Level) set by both Federal and State Health agencies. In addition the metabolites (breakdown) products of this herbicide OP and ES.a were detected at 1.4 and 2.59. Currently the New York State Health Department sets a 50 ppb b1CL on these i:OC's (unspecified Organic Contaminants) while they are under toxological review-. Lastly traces i 1 ppb) of the gasoline additive MTBE (Methyl tertiary buN. 1 ether) '.x as found in the raw water. None of these contaminants were detected in the filtered water. When these samples were collected 40.900 gallons of treated water had passed through the meter serving the carbon units. This Denar Lent ill sample the Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in the Spring of ;,detern:ne if the alters will be necessari next season. a result of the andings at the :�acht Club an extensive suney of eater quaiu: tr: the Hatnlzt ofOnent 15 undervav, Preliminary results show widespread contamination with a number ei h,:`�11::des and `here metaboiites as well as :MTBE. if 011 :have aliv questions concerning this matter, please call S52-190'- Please excuse the dela;.s in repor[ing these results but each sample is being examined for o:Cr '_00 contaminants and the cttrrent turn-around nine at the lab is about twelve weeks. Truk-yours, T Vi \iar!in V.,ater Quality r 'nu Cuiligai} .nn'itilG>:.,F E:< if:-T.L QL:. ,-T% UP'�`cnc'aa T.3'Q GG�Flyi`'•o3�.^EA�L33' - I 09/20/2000 09: 50, 5167651655 KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN PAGE 01 3vu" AfC ""*Mr& anumv at eaw rum 911aq 9NO,M$bna[Pa,eoa "c20e Sot 48,9T.B.`.Doe 1210 sm,&uU,.Vssa',/obt 11971 9-at No.(631) 765b085 Sea Ao.(631)765-1856 September 20 , 2000 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Fax No . 765- 1366 SEP 2 0 90nn Re: Orient Wharf Company Gentlemen: The amendment application to allow the existing shed. which houses necessary water filtration equipment , to remain on the wharf is scheduled for your meeting this evening. To date, we have not received the results of the latest water sample, a copy of which your Board has requested prior to proceeding with this application. Additionally, the corresponding Town Code violation is scheduled for this Friday. September 22 . 2000 in Southold Town Justice Court, We anticipate resolving that violation at that time. As a result , request is hereby made to adjourn our amendment application to your October meeting date. Very t u y S. u n �. Y tdn Afaaugfi&t aaeumv at raw W"waV 9'u aoio d eaztn 44020e Stt.48,,T.0.`%a 1210 Souddd,New VvA 11971 Jet Na(631)765-6085 Sax Na.(631)765-1856 r? June 23 , 2000 n Board of Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 tooSouthold, NYY11971 Re: Orient Wharf Company Premises: 2110 Village Lane, Orient , Gentlemen: Pursuant to your request. I have enclosed the Letter of Request for an Amendment, along with Notice to Adjacent Property Owners in the above-referenced matter, which is scheduled for your July 19 . 2000 meeting. I have spoken with Tom Martin for the Suffolk County Health Department regarding the necessity of the filtration system on the new well . He reaffirmed that the filtration system was necessary, although the new well had not yet been tested, because of its proximity to the old well (approximately six feet) and the general contamination of wells in the neighborhood. Water samples have been taken from the new well , but contaminates resulting from the new piping must be flushed out before a new test for over 200 possible contaminants can be effectively conducted. Again, the applicant will remove the filtration system and shed, as soon as the Suffolk County Health Department determines that the water supply is safe. ( Very u yo rs e aug Encs. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ( D NOV 20 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE 4 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B.BRADLEY,M.D.,M.P.H. 15Nov00 COMUSSIONER Orient Yacht Club Attn: Mr Linton Duell Village Lane Orient,N.Y. 11957 Dear Mr Duell: The latest results of water samples collected on 19Sep00 from the system serving the Yacht Club have been completed by the Health Laboratory. All the results have been forwarded to the Data Unit where they will be inputted and a printout will be forwarded to you when available. A synopsis of the results are as follows. The raw (untreated) water contained 1.8 ppb of the herbicide Alachlor just below the MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) set by both Federal and State Health agencies. In addition the metabolites (breakdown) products of this herbicide OA and ESA were detected at 1.48 and 2.59. Currently the New York State Health Department sets a 50 ppb MCL on these UOC's (Unspecified Organic Contaminants) while they are under toxological review. Lastly traces (1 ppb) of the gasoline additive MTBE (Methyl tertiary butyl ether) was found in the raw water. None of these contaminants were detected in the filtered water. When these samples were collected 40,900 gallons of treated water had passed through the meter serving the carbon units. This Department will sample the Yacht Club water system when it is reactivated in the Spring of 2001 to determine if the filters will be necessary next season. As a result of the findings at the Yacht Club an extensive survey of water quality in the Hamlet of Orient is underway. Preliminary results show widespread contamination with a number of herbicides and there metabolites as well as MTBE. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call 852-1906. Please excuse the delays in reporting these results but each sample is being examined for over 200 contaminants and the current turn-around time at the lab is about twelve weeks. Truly yours, T.M. Martin Water Quality Unit / cc: Town Trustees ✓ Culligan •DWISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY F DRINKING WATER BUREAU• RIVERHEAD COUNTY CENTER • RIVERHEAD NY 11901-3397 Phone(631,852-1905 Ftc(6311852-2743 TIMOTHY FROST BAY HOUSE Orient, New York 11957 June 21, 2000 t a a �� t5 Zooa t Trustees of The Commonalty of the Town of Southold 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 Re: Orient Wharf Co. Dear Sirs: This letter is written on behalf of Timothy Frost and David and Clair Air who are the adjacent property owners to Orient Wharf Co. and respectively the owners of SCTM 1000- 26-1-001.001 and 1000-24-2-27. We write to you to express our objections to any grant of relief to erect or maintain a shed on the wharf. The reasons for our objections are as follows: 1. The applicant has no legal authority,to apply for permission to erect a shed on the wharf, because the applicant does not own the land under water and the historic grant from the State allows only the erection and maintenance of a wharf or dock to promote commerce; 2. The grant of relief introduces an undesirable change in the neighborhood since it allows the location of a building seaward of waterfront residences; 3. No approvals have been obtained or even applied for from the New York Department of State, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 4. The alachlor problem was detected with respect another well, not the well reportedly now in use (the water sample was taken July 21, 1999, but the present well for which the filter is proposed did not exist until recently), and therefore there is in fact no demonstrated need for the shed to house the proposed filters: 0 0 Trustees of The Commonalty June 21, 2000 Page 2 5. The applicant is proceeding without an actual survey showing the exact location of the shed, even though (a) the shed is a structure, (b) a structure requires a building permit, (c) there is no regulation enacted by the Town Board exempting this structure because it is less than 100 square feet, and (d) in all events a variance is necessary from the ZBA; 6. The applicant's premises appear to be improved with numerous improvements which do not have the requisite approvals and consideration of this application on either a crisis basis or business-as-usual basis merely adds another improper approval to a history of indifference to required approvals; and 7. The application should not proceed without the consideration and requirement of a bond to allow removal of the already built (without a single permit from any of the agencies, including the Building Department, Zoning Board of Appeals, DEC, DOS. Trustees and Army Corps) shed in the future. Thank you for reading this letter and making it part of the record of this proceeding. Very truly yours, TIMOTHY FROST, and DAVID AND CLAIR AIR B Timothy Frost TIMOTHY FROST BAY HOUSE Orient, New York 11957 June 21, 2000 Trustees of The Commonalty of the �---- Town of Southold RIP 53095 Main Road p ?!5 P.O. Box 1179 1, JUN 2 12000 Southold, NY 11971 �l Re: Orient Wharf Co. Dear Sirs: This letter is written on behalf of Timothy Frost and David and Clair Air who are the adjacent property owners to Orient Wharf Co. and respectively the owners of SCTM 1000- 26-1-001.001 and 1000-24-2-27. We write to you to express our objections to any grant of relief to erect or maintain a shed on the wharf. The reasons for our objections are as follows: 1. The applicant has no legal authority to apply for permission to erect a shed on the wharf, because the applicant does not own the land under water and the historic grant from the State allows only the erection and maintenance of a wharf or dock to promote commerce; 2. The grant of relief introduces an undesirable change in the neighborhood since it allows the location of a building seaward of waterfront residences; 3. No approvals have been obtained or even applied for from the New York Department of State, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 4. The alachlor problem was detected with respect another well, not the well reportedly now in use (the water sample was taken July 21, 1999, but the present well for which the filter is proposed did not exist until recently), and therefore there is in fact no demonstrated need for the shed to house the proposed filters; Trustees of The Commonalty June 21, 2000 Page 2 5. The applicant is proceeding without an actual survey showing the exact location of the shed, even though (a) the shed is a structure, (b) a structure requires a building permit, (c) there is no regulation enacted by the Town Board exempting this structure because it is less than 100 square feet, and (d) in all events a variance is necessary from the ZBA; 6. The applicant's premises appear to be improved with numerous improvements which do not have the requisite approvals and consideration of this application on either a crisis basis or business-as-usual basis merely adds another improper approval to a history of indifference to required approvals; and 7. The application should not proceed without the consideration and requirement of a bond to allow removal of the already built(without a single permit from any of the agencies, including the Building Department, Zoning Board of Appeals, DEC, DOS, Trustees and Army Corps) shed in the future. Thank you for reading this letter and making it part of the record of this proceeding. Very truly yours, TIMOTHY FROST, and DAVID AND CLAIR AIR By Timothy Frost 1 15 June 2000 0, JUN 15 2000 1 Southold Town Trustees Town Hall _..____ Post Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 By Hand and Certified Mai! Re: Orient Wharf Company—Unregulated and Unpermitted Expansion and Additions Gentlemen: Thank you for meeting with us at your onsite inspection of the Orient Wharf Company (OWC)on Wednesday, 14 June, and for allowing us to participate in your review of the recently erected, unpermitted filtration building. We also look forward to the opportunity at the upcoming public hearing to discuss more esthetically pleasing. more economically prudent, and legally compliant alternatives for the placement of possibly needed filtration equipment At your suggestion, we are submitting additional documentation that highlights the most significant aspects of the unregulated and unpermitted expansion and additions to the facilities at OWC. This material is furnished in further support of our letter to the Southold Town Trustees dated 7 June 2000 (copy attached). Enclosed for your consideration, review and action are three surveys/typographic maps. The first, contained in the files of the Trustees, is a survey of OWC facilities (prepared by Van Tu)l and dated 27 November 1978). The second, a topographic map of OWC facilities (prepared by John C. Ehlers and dated 8 September 1999). The third, an annotation of the topographic map showing actual placement of bulkbeading, wave suppression slats, and numerous 10-inch spiles --all, except as indicated on the third map, without apparent permits and approvals from those Town, County, State and Federal jurisdictional authorities (including the Southold Town Trustees) with relevant regulatory authority and control over OWC. A chronological review of these documents objectively demonstrates expansion and additions to the facilities over the past several years. This unregulated and unpermitted expansion of OWC facilities raises a number of additional density. parking, marine hydrology and navigation, benthic biology and environmental concerns requiring further review and analysis. With this new knowledge and awareness, we respectfully request that the Southold Town Trustees exercise its jurisdictional authority and take corrective action to requirc legal compliance with policies, procedures and regulations of Southold Town Trustees. Likewise, to further ensure legal compliance, we wish to inform you that Letter to Southold Town Trustees 15 June 2000 Page 2 of 2 jwe will also seek corrective action from those other Town County, State, and Federal urisdictional authorities which have relevant separate and overlapping authority and control over OWC. Again, we thank you for vour consideration of this matter, and we look forward both to Your response and to appearing before you on 21 June. Respectfully submitted as adjacent property owners and concerned residents of Orient and Southold Town. /s/ Timothv T. Frost Timothy T. Frost /s/David J. Air David J. Air Attachments Letter to Southold Town Trustees (7 June 2000) Three surveys/typographic maps cc: Jean Cochran(Supervisor) Gregory Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) 7 June 2000 Southold Town Trustees Town Hall lull, Post Box 1179 2 J1 Southold, NY 11971 Tr. By Telefax (w/o attachment) and Certified Mail (w/attachment Re: Orient Wharf Company—Unregulated and Unpermitted Expansion and Additions Gentlemen: Thank you for meeting with us at your worksession on Wednesday, 24 May, and allowing us to raise concerns regarding the unregulated and unpermitted expansion of facilities at the Orient Wharf Company (OWC). At your suggestion, we are providing additional information to further clarify and support this position. With respect to the immediate matter at hand—the recent construction by OWC of a building to house water filtration equipment—we offer four points for your consideration. First, although this is a local issue and should be subject to neighborly discussion and mutual compromise, despite repeated requests since December 1999 to discuss the matter, we have been unable to obtain an audience with representatives of OWC —even as construction of the building commenced and continues. Second, the construction of a building by OWC without either a Building Variance from Southold Town Building Department (as required since the structure is within three feet of the property line) or a Wetlands Permit from Southold Town Trustees (as required since the structure is within 75 feet of the shoreline), is but the most recent of what appears to be a pattern of repeated disregard for the regulatory policies and procedures of a number of Town, County, State and Federal authorities which have relevant jurisdictional interest and control. Third, although, as adjacent property owners to OWC, we are sensitive to the health concerns that may require installation of a water filtration system, we are at a loss to understand why a pre-existing and known water condition should allow OWC both to bypass Southold Town's regulatory process and to avoid open discussion of more esthetically pleasing, more economically prudent, and legally compliant alternatives for the placement of possibly needed filtration equipment. Letter to Southold Town Tees 7 June 2000 Page 2 of 3 Fourth, contrary to Mr. McLaughlin's contention as attorney for OWC, the placement of the filtration building has displaced at least one designated parking space previously available for OWC use. Given that OWC and its tenant, the Orient Yacht Club are already not in conformance with parking requirements of Southold Town, the Southold Town Trustees' acceptance and concurrence in the placement of the building and resulting loss of parking would set a dangerous precedent that other waterfront commercial/maritime establishments could seek to exploit effectively. As mentioned above, and as highlighted at our worksession with you, our far greater concern is not with the building, but rather with the gradual and repeated expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to the facilities at OWC over the past several years—almost all without permits and approval from those governmental and regulatory authorities with relevant jurisdictional authority and control. Over the past five years alone, the most significant aspects of expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC facilities have included the new placement of over 100 ten inch spiles as a new bulkhead along the most western fixed timber dock; the new placement of wave suppression slats along the other fixed timber dock; installation of a number of new and additional mooring slips; dumping of rubble, boulders and rocks in Orient Harbor on property adjacent to OWC (southside of OWC property); and, placement of numerous new and additional spiles in Orient Harbor. These unregulated and unpermitted expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC have led to increased activity at the site and raise a number of additional density, parking, marine navigation and pollution concerns. Given recent actions by OWC —and to better understand the Southold Town Trustees' regulatory process and our rights as adjacent property owners— we have requested, received and reviewed the files of the Southold Town Trustees relating to OWC. With few minor exceptions, OWC has apparently undertaken expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to its facilities without Trustee knowledge and approval. In those few cases in which OWC has actually sought and received Southold Town Trustee approval, such as Wetlands Permit No. 474, the files appear to reveal that such expansion, alterations, modifications or additions were undertaken without the approval of certain other required governmental authorities, and possibly in the face of their explicitly stated objection. Therefore, in those jurisdictional areas where the Southold Town Trustees have an interest and jurisdiction over OWC, we respectfully request that you exercise those interests and take corrective action to require legal compliance with policies, procedures and regulations of Southold Town Trustees. Likewise, to further ensure legal compliance, we wish to inform you that we will also seek corrective action from those Town, County, State, and Federal jurisdictional authorities which have relevant separate and overlapping authority and control over OWC. Letter to Southold Town Trustees 7 June 2000 Page 3 of 3 In conclusion and preparation for the on-site visit by Southold Town Trustees on 14 June, and to simplify and best illustrate the unregulated and unpermitted expansion, alterations, modifications and additions to OWC facilities which we claim, we request that you review the attached survey of OWC facilities (prepared by Van Tuyl and dated 27 November 1978) contained in the Southold Town Trustees' files. Comparison of this survey with the current extent of OWC facilities (as subject to regulation and permit by the Trustees) will objectively demonstrate the expansion of OWC facilities and OWC's blatant disregard for the regulatory approval process that the Trustees are elected to uphold. Once again, we thank you for your consideration of this matter, and we look forward to meeting with you onsite at the OWC facilities on June 14 to highlight what we believe will be an enlightening visual inspection. Respectfully submitted as adjacent property owners and concerned residents of Orient and Southold Town. /s/ Timothy T. Frost /s/David J. Air Timothy T. Frost David J. Air Attachment (Van Tuyl survey of OWC from Southold Town Trustees' files) cc: Jean Cochran (Supervisor) Gregory Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) Edward Forrester (Chief of Southold Town Building Department) Walter Millis (Secretary—OWC) J. Kevin McLaughlin(Counsel to OWC) (all w/o attachment) TOPOORAPHIG MAP THE ORIENT WHARF" SITUATE: ORIENT TOWN: 5OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY 5URvEYED 04-06-OR _' GVA-10\5 5�+0nty -EREON .A��`- 5u,=CL-< COU\TY Lu MAY 3 1 2000 ... .. _ t mot• �:". b f.�.� � ..�s�:1'�': _. i� 'xs ter. -.til. _ _ .*•; _ � .- .. _ �(,a!�' /yam /��,y..a •t ..•'�.�`•- ia':�..t"s .d'`*y i. - - a�a:;,is„:'�'_ '.,�, �a. ti. i c 3 crra.l• +; ..�-� -� sew•-, I � I err /a c .c. :lID d ' � _ -<. `'W� )4>• -�:.v:,s-��y.:'.,'• `,',r�°.%fir vs -�-'� �•� ' 7lu 14 f s get _ �i,�er�a � at i .. •lam�l• /�.. � - .� - l �:� :. J or .' w- .:. ,: _ •%Y • - :-a..Y�' _ 1?^i `� �-/1'J - !F`.y.f�'•i l•. - Ji r` p rc�'.. �y.,.� rN.. (,'C, •7 - '�x/ - .fir•• ��Y.._-t ` �•F � � .O . c� E � al• ... ...^. _ iSI;� ���� „�-.,•�` Sal,.�-•} a1,Z; _ .. _ _ _ ��f�-. .�'"� -��_c�' �"•�' /": 7 '..ih4 i• •fit�aj�' � ..fi:a , �t .:+:.`,•.i •{' fi.. - .1. 1: '��j �/7, '/ .V _ ��ju-ft 1 - �'f'a'Yr• � �:1 .. •'v;X+fyl�`: ^�a�.. _ :.rYy , 4:.:- �: .. - ;:fir'.. .. y:'�•:. _ "_ .. ,.f' _ yy�_ Y�c•1�.. - �•;.. .1� ��! ��,• . :- - :f' �:5�+ .. _. Vicred, '' /11'3 n e - �r0740 r _ - r da" Zr EOFNEIy 4 .r.. rvy�irJ r F �' r... - - wr Ep`�v'/•Y `�9 '�:•�ewnf�y„yi i�r wtl�~'.� 1 ,I.!.; ., �i: /'t/p '✓�i7.'Gr♦ .•� •�; �J �"�� O� n �� c n.:.�`.a.:�..tbl�""'"TM"" � � � . ' / ._. I % r_' '_ P•ySyq 152561'al� e"q•rwv .:"ur l.+wv Mtl •� _. . _ I///%' �./[• .'� � fDIAVD SV ��+a we�� e ., � }: ~ •� f-, �.rr 1- .. \. ;mot '!, , ���4Y ��N# OAY iQ r .� <o,•Krel , rarer ..E. - . - - "s('� - ..��C �. F''; � 5 "/•'0/0 �`. } _ er `777-. i F NE f1.1-: . �i /'•,lj� '��rf;G r."/ .w: f•. �J b! r r �^/Wra u�,e ry,�,,,y,xwnr ir "" _ _ / T '4o ,16 ,rq mrrx pyyrlu rr • _ Z3. ;575y � �"•a'Y wex.nFw.: en/anal burry rtl . ' � � fp(AYD`''� u,w-•��a me rr:w.v;xc ,•/��- - r M T xa n0,LMx •.: _ 'may . r 9 OP GOffLre�C wa// II 11! \ v / con, r Ile. c ✓ er r146kl+°ii /� � , / .,. +ds. .:t,-„ ,"`it�Q?/I':•._ _.:,.• cc to `\ • .. GCMG I trT f - _- - .. / ;f fbt Ei fie, 1� die � L�'� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK S 3�Vin_ RqY '2 n � S .yp5� ROBERT J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES CLARE B. BRADLEY. M.D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER October 12. 1999 Orient Wharf Co. �" Mr. Linton Duell LIV, P.O Box 387 Orient. NY 1195" 11 AY 3 2�1[Re: Orient Yacht Club 3110 Village Lane Orier N " - 6 u. . 1 u Noncommunity Public %Vater Supply Fed ID # 51301-15 Analytical results of water samples collected on 07,2 1.99 Dear Mr. Linton: The water samples taken on the above date at the above referenced Noncontmunity Public Rater Supp1% have been analyzed for microbiological quality. inorganic chemical content, volatile organic Compounds and pesticides. The analysis indicates that at the time of sampling the concentration of the herbicide Alachlor exceeded the Maximum Contaminant Levels I N1CL's 1 or drinking water standards established by the New York State Department of Health for this chemical. The N1CL for Alachlor is ? parts per billion (ppb). A summary- of these results are enclosed. Alachlor is marketed under the trade name LASSO by the Monsanto Company. and is approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency 1USEPAI for use on certain agricultural uses. In N.Y. State such chemical applications are performed by applicators cenified by the N.Y. State Department of Environmental Conservation. The herbicide has been found as'a groundwater contaminant in several areas of the United States including a number of well locations in Suffolk. Additional wells in your area liaye been sampled to determine the extent of the problem. Alachlor has been found to cause cancer in laboratory animals that were given high doses of the pesticide. Animal studies also show that consumption of high doses can result in damage to the liver, kidney, spleen and eyes. The process of setting drinking water standards is designed to protect against possible health effects from long term exposure. Effects can also be influenced by the person's age. sex and overall health. In January 1991 the USEPA established this drinking water standard based on conclusions drawn from the animal studies. Connection to an approved community water supply is regarded by this department as the best alternative in solving well water quality problems. However public water is not immediately available in your area and relocation or deepening of your well are not considered viable options. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ■ 415 OSER AVENUE SUITE 3,HAUPPAUGE.N.Y. 11788 ■ TEL.(5 1 61 85 3-225 1 OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES FAX 1516)853-2307 The Monsanto Corporation, as the manufacturer of this chemical has voluntarily proposed remediation for wells having confirmed concentrations of alachlor exceeding the drinking water standard. The remediation involves providing affected wells with granular activated carbon treatment units. The USEPA has indicated that granular activated carbon is the best available treatment technology for this contaminant. Monsanto has provided this treatment in Suffolk and we have independently confirmed that the treatment removes these concentrations satisfactorile. Perry Salvadorini of Culligan. Monsanto's representative for filter installation, has informed this office that bottled water was provided through the season and that the filters will be installed prior to nest season's start up. if you ha%e any questions feel free to contact this office. Ver Viruls yours. J Daniel 'CK-Iorris Senior Public Health Sanitarian Bureau of Drinking Water cc: Maureen Serifini- NYSDEC Pesticide Registration Unit Thomas Hoogheem, Environmental Operations Director. Monsanto Corp. Perry V. Salvadorini, Culligan, SVFFOLE counA ARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATM ANAl.� FacllLcy Name: )PIENT -eACHT CLUE =nspeccion ao. : 1IC99- Location: '_LL) TILLAGE LnIIE, )PIEPIT .-'ampLE Dare: Y =: { xa S amPle L. tLoa: .'.I'CHEN TAP Sanitarian: MJFFSb T CEa[man c: ❑C tfE FLeil NO. : Notes: : 31,MbOL means 'Less Cnan indlcaCn3 49 d2CCC CGC. mg - - mcl''3Y3R5 Fer ,_ter' uq L Si,r.4_ams 0cr s;'mGo1 means Leve. '_.:una exceeaz ctte maximum or..nam Lnan[ '_evei MCI., sr ac[_on Lave1 'or 'lead ana cco oer. nOUeracei, resL,i:tel sodium adec should 101 exceed "-D mg L. c-.. -ely rls,r_c,ed should act z',eed D -,3 L The MCL :.r nickel 1s a oropose3 LLmic. .-nv MCL's lot shown below have no[ been estabLisned. --E1- = Pe=uL [ r - Zia .,rolp: ALCI - c3 F 3' I E_ inaL.zea o: 3u[ ix _cunr . Deca-one r z-a - --- -_- Tc[al 41_L^alb i_r . . . . . . . 1 )v' . ;G u4 L xam,1 31dlc.arb.' L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - . -. :a L ]z ccnrpL. . . A:9 u are-311[c::ide. . . . . . . . . . . . < i _-r _a L _-9aott[1c1. . . 4 ar . . . .. . u4 L Carte -ran . . . . .. . _ }J 13 _ -Dr:p ur 3a 4 r. . . . . H• dY .t__3 coot iran. . . . . . . . Ig ne,❑1 DCd... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -_-su L-s i_r ]r;p: »_T--1 L,_, n,a -- - _ - - a _ _ L - - _ _ - __r,..a n•• �. _ Hsi SS - =cr _amP-- =.. . . ''HLiP.I[1.=.T ED _JES ano L_'_a1 c i«ol.: sLPn.a-3F;:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •f ;era 3h,' . . . . . . . . . . . _ ] t '14 } ! CDT. . . . . . . . . . . . __ lalr3 SFC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . nn^R aL'en.'_E. . . . . . . . . . . _ 42PC3'"LLr - - - . ' ^n Lr . . . . . . . . . _ _ }1 .3 ' rianE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.ePrs -Pa- Ld . . . . . . - )ia d,L . 1: - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J3 L d -rdr, a1 r, I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - �u . . . . . . . . . . . . ...- . .1 -3 L _cror,o ] cn-�-r p r-.csr.E. - - Fesl' _ _-r 6amc_a GrsuP: DP:ZTH-L mot_ ana,z-d = _ __ "c�lr.r p _ __ _ - _ e ar c.,�nC ;_ _ [.i 7do 1. . . Pes__L. b)r �amp1E Cro,lp: -IET-L: anaL'.led z, _if'3i is _ _ ___ _____ 3i_ r � n :' � cnrrF r[ H 1r.. ______ -- . . . . . . . . . . . .- .-, ;p 13 L :Tlz<el N . . - a1uRLnlm r?.1 . . .:v . . . . _ _ ;r SenlC - - o Tw R% .. . . . . . . . . . . E arLVm v- _ Jai 'J] r -IICi �br . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aer,l 11. Re . . . . . . . . . . } 14 L ri lm . . . . -ads'iLr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . u4 L .,n• _m ca i 1P �r �.ppefFF e.. C1 . . . . . . .. 1 �4 L :in- . . . . . _ .? - Mer.=.._ .tie o . . . . . . . . . . . _ J L Planyaca sE ttn . . . . . . . . . . . . o:r }, n 14 L =-on Fer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - _.} _. T4 L _ron - Manganese :molned. _a.c _ -_ -9- r3 - . . . 41cL,baeneR rPlu . . . u4 L 9calum _ Fesulrs fir aa.01= GmuP: ETAIIDAPD INCPC: iIC3 analyzed by 6uff_Lk Count,, Department _f Heait['. Sa_._tes pH-Lah.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 5.1G0 _ AMMInla DIH-1-[J _ __ . =Lm. NicrLCe Ih."-Nr . . . . . . . . . _ _ O L iFeCGC :c L?. . . . .. ....... . . . . .. .. . JJ W[r '" 'lc I . . . . . . . . . . . . J. l _i9 L Silo:ec ' . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y _ 'rE3:LT3 _::ITIIIUED AT `IEi:T F-GE. . . . '!Pej i, MAY 3 • SVFFOL,K COUNTOAR� OF HEALTH SERVICES - WATER ANAL P3C'_Li E, Name+ -?:EC1T LCH'" ::-,ua In Pec[.^n ;lC59-1C - Fed. _,mace n c :11J ':.LACE LANE. 'i2.I E[11' SamF'--e =a'- 3amp_c _..car..,, _ ..HE[! Pam_ -an-rar_an' 'r_erran[. :TONE -.aid ❑o . ' _--- -. . -�---i :lures. symboi means •Less .han indicari n3 tler_eccion. mq L mr L_igrams c • ,..___ ua L ,crcgrm7s per !izer. Ey-�c-._ -pans 'level -;[nd axc=_ems ;ne mazu ^wm C=L.1..anr _eel iMC' .r o ac[rn '_e:e: _cad and 'opp-r. )tederace_. .=__r____=d sodd�m 9iec should noc axceed =- m9 '- da•.crz'.. res-___ ad snoala or exceed =I nq L. Yne :4C _cc nLc�a1 Lz a propoEed L_.TkLc. en', XC• 3 not srDa Leiow nave -,Gr =_.. =scab1_sned. =,c ECEGI:J- PAG- ___ r --,Pla anal-,zed cy 3,--DIk I;i.n—. -epara=err, ._ leaf- _ar:`ce __.rcdc�_ccr_:ne[.-ar.-. . . . . . . . . - Si'.; =.]J iicj -_ter L- n: . . . . . . . . . . . . .. _er._-^a . . . . . . . . . . . - _3 _ ug L _are . . . . . . . L .or-oenz-n� . . . . _ - . . . . . Lena. . . . . . . _ - - lg g L o _ _ . . . . . . _ sc" _ _ ___. . . . _ -g - �enzar-. . . L _ . . . . . . . Gen_ara. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `_ - -_'Iar._._c'_.. L 2ron':_Lcrr -_' . . . . . . . .q L .er =u✓---=n . . . . . . . . . - _.1 _g L _el .."-..-.oer n.or p era . . . . . . 'i 'ig . . [] .g - L LJ - lrnn= . . . . . . - - _.J L . . . . . . . . . . . Cg Dime-n`'Y__ _ aa. . . . . . . . . . J _ - or -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.9 L -erl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ccur . . . . . . . . . . ug C d �ucaucne �« . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - .3 L r..mes:.�c=. . . . . . . . . . . _ - -.g L Pe[cahl,zr___ _n. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r� L �f a MAY 3 1 2000 -- TOP06RAPHIG MAP "THE ORIENT WHARF" 51TUATE: ORIENT TOWN: 5OUTHOLD J IDi J ( p° F SUFFOLK GOUNTY, NY S SURVEYED 09-08119 E TRENGED O .S HE�ON �LNGVD' REFE J SU 1000 24 - 2 TAX x is I I A'PhOlt Surp,ce Omer . . ... ' - mro -: - Stogy , rr..°"°,' , }` ^ 6 ti LAND SJ JUN 1 5 2000 rw�O1 , ` ewe JOHN C. EHLERS L SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN SCREED N.Y.S.LiC.NO.50202 ^ I RIVERHEEAD,N.Y.11901 -- - I369-8288 Fax 369-8287 Cc�.�,_�GER\PROS\wazf2 ! GRAPHIC, 5GALE _ 1"= 40' I TOP06RAPHIG MAP a "THE ORIENT HHARF" o 4 z H 51TUATE: ORIENT ✓7 TOWN: 5OUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY T / I`', o - '' 1•" , �r s SURVErM Oq-08-gq r ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE ,S r /L REFERENCED TO M.5L. NGVD'2q '°w Il 1 •' SUFFOLK COJNTr TAX A I• • / N I000 - 24 - 2 - 20.I k Alp • —� 1 Lu J n,cae , 3L s�wia /1 I� •�� � S Il nano �uq ��� +^ • 1— I� • � • � 1 • i" L, one = > . _ s - — � - it Ili`, . ie 1 r SU�VE� CD S�1Lc rx° n yIc C. /1DD1TIety co IJ _ _ _ _ mtis ryo 5 ,E ,_��.�...... Pp CA NO SAP OHN C. EHLERS L SURVEYOR Q - e e 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S.LIC.NO.50202 I RIVERBEAD,N.Y. 11901 369-8288 Faz 369-8287 R_F'.-TIGER\FROS\watf2 GRAPHIC SCALE 1"= 40' o�Og�FF01,��0 Town Hill. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Telephone Southold. New York 11971 (516) 765-189Z SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tuesday, June 13, 2000, the following recommendation was made: THE ORIENT WHARF CO. 24-2-28.1 to allow for the existing shed, which houses necessaFy water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf. 2110 Village Lane, Orient The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. �. 9rleuit .Mc.Caug�P�in wua& waq 9U�Wound eatta 44020e 2L 48,Y.0.Sax 1210 Sou6UU,Nan ynk 11971 .T4 Ma.(631)765-6085 .Batt.Na.(631) 765-1856 May 31 , 2000 Southold Town Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 V,Re: Orient Wharf Co. MAY 3 1 2000 SCTM #1000-024.00-02 .00-028.001 �- - Gentlemen: I have enclosed the Letter of Request for a Waiver, along with Notice to Adjacent Property Owners in the above-referenced matter. As we advised you at the work session last week, the small shed was placed on the wharf in order to screen the water filtration system that is necessary in order to provide potable water to the Orient Yacht Club and to the boat slips . A copy of the letter dated October 12, 1999 from the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is enclosed herewith. As you can see, the water supply has over four (4) times the allowable limit of the herbicide Alachlor, a known carcinogen. The placement of the filtration equipment was dictated by the location of the well . The carbon filter tanks are approximately 8 1/2 feet tall. The idea of the shed was to scene these filtration tanks from view, and to provide some deterrence to possible vandalism. The only alternative would be to locate the filtration tanks near or in the Orient Yacht Club building at the end of the wharf. The cost of properly running the necessary plumbing to allow such a placement has been estimated as at least $5 ,000. 00. Prior to the placement of the shed, a representative of the Orient Wharf Company was advised by the Southold Town Building Department that a shed of this size (less than 100 sq. ft. ) . did not require a building permit. No one realized that a Trustee's Permit would be necessary, as the shed simply sits on top of the wharf, which has existed for well over 100 years . It is anticipated that the filtration system, and therefore the shed, is temporary in nature. The water supply will be periodically tested, and we have been advised that when the untreated water supply tests show potable water, the system can be removed. My client 's intention was to make the best of a bad situation. The public health hazard of the water supply dictated the necessity of the filtration system. The placement of the filtration equipment within a small , tasteful shed was thought to be more visually palatable than simply having two 8 1/2 foot tall filtration tanks open to public view. Our request for a Waiver to allow the shed to remain, as it presently exists , will have absolutely no effect on the wetlands. The shed, with the equipment inside, simply sits on the existing wharf, and will be removed as soon as the health hazard ceases to exist. Ver t u y ur J. a 'n ugh n Sncs. 05/24/9 00-WED 15:40 FAX 516 852 2740 SUFF.CTI DEPT.OF HEALTI 001 • COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Romun. J.GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COLIMTY ExecvnvE CO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERV IC 9 CURE Arn CT COMMIS M.0.tl+.rn Na mNN6510NER C 0 V E R FAX S H CE E IT —� n To: G�J/ �+o `� !O W n. 1 S 22S II /J , � 16o2 2U�SKL Fax#: 7a co r Ili�l Date: UJI MAY 2 4 200 From: SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVI OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES L -_� ❑ Bureau of Drinking Water - Hauppauge }� Telephone#516-853-3076 FAX#516-853-3075 or 516-853-2927 Bureau of Drinking Water - Riverhead Telephone#516-852-1905 FAX#516-852-2743 ❑ Bureau of Groundwater Resources - Hauppauge Telephone#516-853-3092 FAX#516-853-3075 or 516-853-2927 - Pages (Including cover sheet) CONA4ENfS: If there is any problem regarding transmittal of this material,please call OIVISIONOP ENVMONNENTAL QUALITY TEL 1515I 96]-]O7■ OFFICE OFWAT"RESOURCES • 223 RABRO DRWE EA6T.NAUVP�YG4 N.Y. I1T■■-12S0 ■ FAR ISI■I es]-]OT5 05.24i2000 WED 15:40 FAX 510 852 2743 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI Z 002 I COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Robert J. Gaffney Suffolk County Executive Department of Health Services Clare B. Bradley. M.D., M.P.H. Commissioner Memo To: Southold Town Trustees From: T.M. Martin Date: 24 May00 iRe: Orient Yacht Club Late in 1999 the herbicide Alachlor was detected above the MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) in the well serving the Orient Yacht Club. This Department considers the presence of Alachlor in drinking water as a serious public health problem. Attached please find an EPA fact sheet on Alachlor and note the listed health effects. This herbicide is manufactured by Monsanto Corporation and has been found in other wells in Suffolk County as well as other areas of the United States. The maker of the product has a well assistance program and they were notified of the detection. Thcy have filters already installed in Springs, Cutchogue, East Moriches, Shelter Island as well as Orient. In the Spring of this year representatives of the Yacht Club,the Health Department as well as the filter contractor met at the site and discussed the installation of the filters on the existing water system. It was decided to place the filters on the lands end of the wharf closest to the well and pump. The filter contractor offered to provide a shelter for the filters to prevent vandalism and make the installation more esthetically pleasing, which was strongly supported by this Department. Since that time problems with the installation have arisen culminating with the issuance of a summons. In almost 4,000 pesticide installations this is the first time problems within jurisdictions have occurred. It is hoped that in the interest of public health a waiver be granted so the Orient Yacht Club will have access to safe potable water. If can provide any assistance in this matter, please call 852-1906. DRINKING WATER UNIT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY cOUN7Y CENTER RIVERHEA .NEW YORK 11 MI3397 (831)852-1905 05/24.2000 WED 15:41 FAX 516 852 2749 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI Z 009 • United 5 Office of Will EPA 811-F-85-003 b-C Envfronmee protection 4, October 1995 Agency aEPA . National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Alachlor This is a factsheet about a chemical that may be found in some public omitainwArm or private drinking water supplies. It may cause health problems if Snrnseas: found in amounts greater than the health standard set by the United "'CLO' ZERO States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). "'a Z"°B WHAT IS Alachlor is an odorless,white solid.Th6 greatest use of alachloris as a herbicide AucHLOR for control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in crops, primarily on com, Arrc How is rr user? sorghum and soybeans.Alachlor is the second mostwidely used herbicide in the •United States, with particularly heavy use on corn and soybeans in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The listof trade names given below may help you find outwhetheryou are using this chemical at home or work. WHY is Af ACHLOR In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking WaterAct.This law requires EPA rNO REGULATED? to determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do or may cause J health problems-These non-enforceable levels, based solely on possible health . risks and exposure, are called Maximum Contaminant Level Goals. The MCLG for aachlor has been set at zero because EPA believes this level + of protection would not cause any of the long-term effects described below. Based on this MCLG;EPA has set an enforceable standard called a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). MCLs are set as dose to the MCLGs as possible, considering the ability of publicwater systems to detect and remove contaminants using suitable treatment technologies.. The MCL has been set at 2 parts per billion(ppb)because EPA believes,given present technology and resources,this is the lowest level to which water systems can reasonably be required to remove this contaminant should it occur in drinking water. These drinking water standards and the regulations for ensuring these Stan- dards are met,are called National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.All publicwater supplies mustabide bythese ULw; regulations. 3 WHAT ARE THE Sh elm•EPAhasfoundalachlortopotentialycauseHEALTH EFFECTS? the•following health effects when people are exposed to it '• at levels above the tim Puwr+m short MLNVIW w R �• ' y -slight skin and eye irritation. ALAN= Lo term:-Alachlor has the potential to cause the AL"&x CNLMCHWR w• following effects from a lifetime exposure at levels.above Or tst•'..Or 1995 '� - • � Consumer Version Pdnted on Recycled Paper 05,24%2000 WED 15:41 FAX 516 852 2743 SUFF.CTY DEPT.OF HEALTI 004 the MCL: damage to liver, kidnllspleen; lining of nose and eyelids;ocer. The major source of environmental release of alachlor is through its manufac- HOW MUCH ALACHLOR ture and use as a herbicide. 'Alachlorwas detected in rural domestic well water rs�PRoDu=AND i by EPA's National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells. EPA's Pesti- RF-EAsED To THE cides in Ground Water Database reports detections of alachlor in ground water EAMROMMENT? at concentrations above the MCL in at least 15 States. If released to soil,alachlorcan be broken down by bacteria and sunlight,usually WHAT HAPPENS TD within two months. However, alachor does not bind to most soils very well and ALAcHLOR WHEN IT IS RELEASED TO may either evaporate or leach into ground water. THE ENVIRONMENT? Sunlight and bacterial action are also important for degrading alachlor in surface water, but evaporation generally does not occur. Once alachlor enters ground water, its break down is very slow. The bioconcentration of alachlor in aquatic organisms is not important. Any alachlor taken up by plants or animals is quicklyeliminated. The regulation for alachlor became effective in 1992. Between 1993 and 1995, How MLL EPA required your water supplierto collect water samples every 3 months for one. ALAcHLoR. eE DETECTED IN AND year and analyze them tofindoutifalachlorispresentabove0.2ppb.Ifitispresent REMOVED FROM above this level, the system must continue to monitor this contaminant. MY DRw mo WAm? If contami.inant levels are found to be consistently above the MCL, your water supplier must take steps to reduce the amount of alachlor so that it is consistently below that level.The following treatment methods have been approved by EPA for removing alachlor. Granular activated charcoal. If the levels exceed the MCL, 2 pp6 the system must notify the public via Howwru f"OW IF j newspapers, radio. N and other means. Additional'actions, such as providing ALA DR rs rN Mr alternative drinking water supplies; may be required to prevent serious risks to WA public health. . i rl Learn more about your drinking water! EPA strongly encourages people to learn more Your state Department of Health/Environment is also a about their drinking water.and to support local efforts valuable source of information. to protect and.upgrade the supply of safe drinking For help in locating these agencies or for information on water. Your water bill or telephone book's govern- drinking water in general, call• ment listings are a good starting point EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline: (800)426-4791 Your local water supplier can give you a list of the For additional information on the uses and releases or 'chemicals they test for in your water,:as well as how chemicals in your state,contact the: your water is treated. Community Right-to-Know Hotline: (300) 535-0202. I 3 nJ �e:�ooc Page2': conservenion.. um � � .pad . , :. ,+, � � � � . • � F 3r 'E3 n 05;20;2000 SAT 12:04 FAX 631 734 2315 SOUTHOLD P.D. CHIEF R 001 I Agencv 2 ecint, Newyork State 3.oRl S� Ong a.Cam NO 6 rnClar u �-I y INCID€NT REP.ORF NY j'j 5 [� sePo OQ — `///� / 2 Be,rort oav B 0.11 / 'I 6e"tTuna o<e@erea 1a Uav n Dam 12 T,me Occo.,►urred Jn.Day N DeLe Is rlmr SQ' J Imo+ jc'o / j ticticDnsiFfool_� SR S� (r+ I .:'J /?=.: 161n'dcm Typ' I/ Bu4ne54 N+me 18.Wedpanf+) A V19 Inrldee[edd•e» 5D"I No,Stilt Name.Slag No ApLNal 20 Glv,6tam.nP(QC Q T 0 21 Location Code n 22.OFF.NO. L5w SECTION SD9 IL C4T DEG ATT NAMEOFOFFENSE [TS /2 No cif Vi<Lm[ 2 2+ Ne.al Su¢Rs 3 2S.PCean Tyge:CO=ComplainantOT-Other N=PenoninnaM"ed PR=perwn RetleRiRg WI=WILna$Fir-That lnt'Nleaed or=vie4m 26 v,<tim aho complainant QY[]n F— N TTPEA40 NAME(LAST.FIRST,MIDDLE„ITLE) Daleet STREET NO..STREET NAME,BLDG.NO.,APT.NO.,OTY, SPATE, VP- Telephone No. C z Birth C O fe-> ''�ZY�i� �.aTa u. �•y1.a OR/r.L. : /s'y //5'S�� zL3Lf+' _ r_. W c/G v n� O h N a l 71 Dxre of Girth 26 Agr 29 Se. 30.Race 31.Ethnic 32 Hart".. 33 Readenee Slates IDTaml Res, Porr.gn N.T. C Cl M Q P ❑ White 0 Bq<k 0 Othw 0 r1hp.ni<Q unk. Q Ye5 Aevdant ❑❑Taurlst Q 5wden[hl Other > ❑U Q lydian❑Adan❑unk. ❑NOM115pank ❑No a Commuter❑M111taN ❑Nome ess Q❑ask 3+.Tyoe/No 35.Namp(Late-Firs[.Middle) 36.41iAYNihnemelMaidm Name(Last-FRL Middle) 37.ApoerenLCandition Z Q LmpairDwga ea ❑ MYmal Dls Qunk N' O ❑ Impaired Alto ❑ Ini 2 01❑APP Normas — Q. 38.Address(irtee[No.,Lrees rvemq Bldg.NO.Apt No.CITY.S(e[e,lip) 3@ Vhone No. 0 P1ome +D.Spiel Security No L t-� Cl worn WN 41 Date of Birth +2 Aae 43.So. Aa.Ra<@ +S.E[hnl< n65kin +1.0<[Ypabon rs.w ❑ M Q F 0 White Q Dleck ❑Other ❑NNpani<C3 unk. Q Ugh[ Q Dark Q vmc. M� V1 u ❑Indian E7 Asian Q unk. ❑Nan-Nispani< nMedlam o oLn@r Na +B Neeht +9 wmghc So na.t 51 Eyes '2 Glassls 53.Baild Sa.kmployerl5choel 55.Address N Z ❑ Yes[] Contem 0Small QLarge N Q No Medlym ,- 56.5caN Martz yi attoos(Dracnbel 51.Mi., a I Se.vk[Imay Property PrepertY p{lpp , "'iASEcoyr •Dae"`�PtoA value a Su[us T pe eSsure -DYp r" Model Serial No. t - a F a u 59.Vehicle La )acme Pldie No Fu I1Q 61 State 62 Ecp.Yr. 63.Plate Type 6a value 6 SmM Partial0 _- `❑ AS W x 65 Veh.Yr. 66.wave 62 Madd 68.Style tiY vIN ❑ S 10 CDlpr(S) 11. TOWM By' . . _ ___ 72.Vehicle Na4a a 13. - ❑- p D a a _.. u 2 t3 791npuinea(Cheek.11 chat apply) 75.NYSPIN Massage Ne 76 Complainant Sigoewre } Q DMV Q WanLwarran[ Q sc fllnw 1 ❑CrirTr lsl ❑ S[elen Prepctry ❑ other YfL DOAN Q shew@Y:3r I) Off R �qn wre d nkl 1B 1D No l9.Supervispls S,gndIDre(In<bde Ranh Ba ID No � Ba. �d @T�Staws ll < . ws pace ' 93 Nori(iMrtDT❑Open Ounfourded S ❑Ya.Rafusad R❑oAas4 Prow Dedmd OWarrant Ad.hed T-� G' QC6l flm No rescody Qor,—,do. 0011ewer Dead OUo el a� vei UCJ5320512/971 'FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHAS EA5 ACRIME,PURSUANT TO THE NEWYORK STATE PENAL LAW I Agency 2 O+n.o It New York State 3 DRI ong s CaseN`1//`/ 6 mC-9/ sc✓� ./� INCIDENT REPORT Nv j i ;f ❑ S Pp cc d ] geport Dap B Ga[e 9 gPDorl rime Occurred 10 Dal II Dale 12 ome Occurred 13 Day la Gare SILmr �.., 161noden[rype ll Buaness Name 18 WeapOn(s) 4 H // Z �.J.J iCl�yC' Lr.c I] 1 1 11 L.Iun.n CCOe V 19 modem Add.... Sir Fill Sneel Nam± BId3 No 4pl h01 20 City,Slime Lpl❑C ❑ ❑v _ B—_ a 11 i /, - w v //, 55 z 5-,7 22 OFF.NO. LAW SECTION SUB CL CAT DEG ATT NAME OF OFFENSE CTS 13 No Of vlarns C 2 24 NO Of Suspects �T-^- J �- 3 2S.Person Type—Complainant OT=Other Fit=Person Interviewed PR=PeriOn Reporting Wl=NAthess III=Not lnteMewed VI =Viaim 26 ma,in also complaina nt QY❑N E- us TYPEMO NAME(LAST,FIRST,MIDDLE.TITLE) Date of STREETNO..S4REETNAME.KDG.NO.,A.FT.NO.CITY, STATE, 61' Telephone No. 2 Birth O / F— W TL_ Q v N`— O us N Q I f 2] Dale of B�aM1 28 Age 29 Se+ 30 Race 1I Ethnic =�e, �es,'Cepl ence Status ❑temp Res. Foreign Nat 1 M F ❑ White❑ Black Q Other Wipan¢❑ Unk ❑fount QStudenl Fl Other j U Q Indian Q Asian Q Unk ❑NOroHlspan¢ muter❑Military Hemeress Qunk 34 TypefNO 35.Name(Last.First.Middle) t[D] Asiao McknameARalden Name(Last.First.M,ddle) O moaned!t Coosrugs io Mental DN ❑Unk K Z O ❑Imparts Alcu ❑ Inlr III Q App Nofm _. N 39 Phone rvO 40 Social Security No W 38 Address(Street NO.Street Name Bldg No.Apt NO.City.Stale Home L d Work HD _ V 45 Ethnic 46 Skin 47 Occupation Wy~1 4t Date of Birth 42 Age 43 Se. aa M IL W ❑ M F Black Other Q N.n-H. ❑ tlnk ❑ fight ❑Dark th Unk �� ❑ U ❑ Unk. ❑Non-Hlspanr. ❑Medium ❑ Other NQ 48 Height 49 VrelgM 50 nan 51 Eyes 52 Glasses 53 Build 54 EmpmyerlSchocl 55 Address N 2 ❑ yes❑ Contacts ❑Sinai [I Large N ❑ NO ❑Medham ao 56 ScaNMarksaa[[oo Cesmice) 57 Mnc ❑ 1 se.Vietimor I Property Property Quantity/ Make Or Model Serial No. Description Value tunapi N Status Type M r T T ❑H di uua V L�cens? ate o Full❑ State 62 E+p Yr 63 Plate Type 64 vame a59 Vehicle Status Partial 65 Veh yr 66 Mr.e 6 68 Style 69 VIN 2 W ❑> 70 ColOgs) n rowed By _ ]2 4chile NO@t ] 1 9 C Q El Z El 13 ul 74 Inquiries(Check all that apply) 75 NYSPINMessage NO 16 Complainant Signature > ❑ DMV ❑ WarvWarrant ❑ Scofflaw F OCrl Isto, - ❑ S[Olen Property El Other She t et Sheet ]] a ON' of Ign rule d nr) 781ON. ]9 Supervisor's Signature(include Rank) 80 ID NO k- da an ag 2 f 51 Status ❑Open /M Closed flf Closed.check toff below) ❑Unfounded 82 Status Date 93. NOhNed.TOT of 0 �kha Refused tO�P OArresl []Pros Declined ❑Warrant Ads.," r �/) Q ❑CBI ❑luv No Custody ❑Arrest-lu. ❑offender Dead ❑E+[rad Dean ❑unxno— �1 `� �" age X IS-32O5 12,4]1 `FALSE STATEMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE AS ACRIME.PURSUANT TO THE NEW YORK STATE PENAL LAW d -19=2C0L�`f3^:'q$FT1 FFM' 01Rfc11T =OUNTF:�' S'TOFEyLTI� TO 13 . __ T,_ - �,- - - — — �— _ ---- ---T0P0G PRIG MAP a -------- - "THE ORIENT W44A.RF" SITUATE: ORIENT TOHN: gOUTHOLD w %FFOLK COUNTY, NY -� .F � t SURV�"Fr OG-08-QQ _ l — '+i F!FVATIONS 5'IOINN r'E�GV�2 r--• 5U1✓=OL1; r.L'Uti"' 7AX u • IGOG - 6a - 2 - 28.1 r aul F fvt O C. EH� OP ink 1, <;.SFtio. s zPJ�� JjE JUN 1 2M _- JOHN C.n EHLERS CA ND S� SURD- EYOR l_ , _ r �,r��raG SCALE — 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S. LIC, NO. 50202 - R[VERFIEAD,N.Y. 12901 ocn cello I-, 46U-49Q9 --- .•.r.r••. — ti Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit 4474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under thr information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information ry requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required ::a map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)'; the map and drawings ^' submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480) —far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it \ c does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf, provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code, the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" j10-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that "within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the 'structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable, then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation ltol be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floorjoist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven (11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(I) have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV'# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application" has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held "upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit"will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory — in the M1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law" where the proposed action (construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed, we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of Fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Oualit- Review Act (SEOR) Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6' penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentary proof that all other necessary Permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5 Attachments Photographs of Shed Coastal Erosion Hazard Area Survey FIRM (Number 36103C0068 G) cc: Southold Town Trustees Orient Wharf Company Board Orient Yacht Club Board Concerned Members of the Orient Yacht Club With annotation of relevant areas for respective action/compliance/enforcement: Jean Cochran (Southold Town Supervisor) Greg Yakaboski (Southold Town Attorney) Ed Forrester (Southold Town Building Inspector) (Southold Town Planning Board) Suffolk County Planning Commission New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Attn.: Charles T. Hamilton, Regional Supervisor Attn.: Karen Murphy, Regional Attorney 6 �. , determine when actuarial rates apply to structures in the zones where eleva- tions or depths have been established. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your - insurance agent or Call the National Flood Insurance Program at(80016�6620. sx t 4 APPROXIMATE SCALE _ 5500 0 Soo FEET i Y ® NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM F.. FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP - SUFFOLK COUNTY) kv NEW YORK (ALL JURISDICTIONS) PANEL 66 OF 1026 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTEDI CONTAINS: COMMMY NUMBER PAIVEL SUFFIX --� SOUTMO�,TOWN OF 36M 0016 G MOTE THIS MM INCORPORATES APPROXIMATE BOUNDARIES OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM UNITS AND/OR OTNERIMSE MOTECICD AREAS ESTASUDIED UNDER THE COASTAL RARR ER MPWvEMENT ACT Of MR WL 1OW01. NW,N IYe:TM MM IR1tMN FIIPvat arW MNF6 IA OW I , Pyy�ynnpp ttNV ar4Fr6: NI6 COMM UNITY Numm Mawr eMeYa etauid as"W W pWaAno+poYaliw+Is,to W100 MAP NUMBER 3610300066 6 7?° Ib" 52. 5" EFRM BATE: ORIENT REACH MAY 4,1"8 STATE PARK a 100Z Pa;e to S�7ro11?ed ftelcmaE Agency •a;Is Clem siyjInoge qua woo jo suoi;sanb EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 000 Microleasing is a unique institution, which fills a unique role in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad oblast. It is the only leasing company which operates as a commercial firm with a socio-economic objective. 000 Microleasing target market consists of entrepreneurs and small businesses, ` with a special focus on women-led businesses. It offers this clientele access to credit otherwise unobtainable to them in the form of equipment leases up to $25,000. 000 Microleasing is an experienced leasing company. It has concluded 116 leases: 5 are paid off and 61 are outstanding. Forty percent lessees are women-led businesses. Four yearneasmglqemonstrates that it is possible to work with this neglected clientele while maintaining a quality portfolio that any financial firm would envy. The objective is to grow these businesses and to grow with them, in the belief that Russia's development as a political democracy depends on a stable and growing economy at the grass roots level in the regions. To achieve its financial objectives, 000 Microleasing must expan&its sources of funds substantially. The outstanding quality of the leasing portfolio, the ven experience and expertise of the staff and the valuable service that Microleasing uniquely perm should make this an attainable goaL Credit and equity investment from one or more western financial institutions are a critical step. 000 Microleasing aims to raise $5,000,000 over the next three to five years to become a stable financial institution, which can o gffer at least $US one million worth of leases annually. `�`-'`` � ,�f��1 I pr / �r � r /�� Y\�U\� �I - -,/�kL J-�/Y`` �dti1 (�U^ i c'-t?' 61.1.,:lC tlr-�f Z. I 1� L , - i ry 1,-ails u5=_� I c v... OBJECTIVES `lb �N'lv✓'�N w'CCt fwLiF(E �/- /��t..y u•..� / (( ? To be financially sustainable in 2005 and beyond ? To ensure that 40-50%lessees are women entrepreneurs and women-led businesses ? To expand the firm's leasing market in St. Petersburg and its suburbs, as well as regional centers throughout the Leningrad oblast ? To maintain model linkages and working relationships with local and oblast governments ? To encourage the replication of microleasing programs for small businesses throughout the Russian Federation. In Russia, small business is defined by number or employees(up to 100),not by financial indicators. 1 . . b I J- 1 \ ZONE X yf \ ZONE X 'hq{ ZONE llo� HONE AE ' (EL 91 g B OR r. COASTAL BASE DWgRO IONS OF OTO NGVO APPLY ONLY LAN - sA vd i JOINS PANEL 01111 Looz '9l 4oieptl Repsin41 palepdn lse-1 tieulwa$pio e •alls gatA sl4i lnoge sluowwoo jo s31je4 loel of llew pugs i h . Volkhov, city and region (pop 120,000) By the end of 2000, 341 registered small businesses and 1,517 registered sole proprietors, compared to 285 businesses and 1,294 proprietors in 1997. The city is the site of a major aluminum factory and women's garment manufacturing plant. It has a strategy to encourage the growth of small business over the next ten years, with particular attention to construction, renovation, repair services,,tourism infrastructure. The city is located in a rural area on the banks of the Volkhov river. Gatchina and Tosno(pop 324,600) Gatchina and Tosno are not far from St. Petersburg, have a higher standard of living than the rest of the oblast and Ictive small business communiod The level of clients resources and know- how is higher here than in other regions. These citie§attract major international investors such as Caterpillar, and other domestic industries. The Gatchina Business Development Center is part o%JL- 000 Microleasing partner network. 000 Microleasing has concluded one lease deal in Gatchina. Tixvin city and region(pop 84,400 This region has the highest level of unemployment in the oblast(36.8%), so the Leningrad oblast government has instituted special measures, including tax breaks to encourage the development of small business and job creation. There is an affiliate of the St. Petersburg Kirovsk tractor factory, and two aluminum plants in the towns of Pikalevskii and Boksitogorsk. The Tixvin Business Development Center is part of the Microleasing partner network and conducts extremely professional business training courses. T e, 000 Microleasing has concluded four leases in Tixvin. 1 Luea_ city and region(pop. 127,200) Located at the southern tip of the oblast, Luga is a rural area. It is the prime recreation area of the oblast, with hotels, rest homes, sanitoria. One quarter of all Russian metal working firms are in Luga. The business development center in Luga is part of the 000 Microleasing partner network and has produced one leasing client. Lodeinoe Pole town and region(pop. 66,500) Lodeinoe Pole is an agricultural area, 70% forested, at the northern end of 000 Microleasing territory. 000 Microleasing has four leases in Lodeinoe Pole. Vyborg, city and region(pop. 200.000) 5C Located on the border with Finland, this Its very entrepreneurial area and developing rapidly economically. There is a large branch of the St. Petersburg Herzen Institute, whose director is well-known to Microleasingaand is conducting a high level of business training, management and finance. There is an active business development center whose management is also a known quantity and which is eager to work with 000 Microleasing. The Leningrad oblast government has targeted this area for development and investment, construction of a new port is underway, and there is substantial 'international participation. Yybor is a promising target for 000 3 Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit #474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)"; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (l:240) and in another(1:480)— far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chapter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is set back less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessary, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf; provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is borne by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code, the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not begun but for which a building permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" 110-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the 'structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable, then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation Ro] be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floorjoist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(I) have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NYSDEC vs. Orient Wharf Company (NOV# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application" has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held "upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit-will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory — in the M1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for "authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law" where the proposed action (construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed, we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spile placement application, we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24,000)'; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another (1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address "the review procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR), Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6' penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentary_proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5 Submission to Southold Town Trustees — 25 April 2001 The Orient Wharf Company ("the applicant"), has submitted two separate applications for a Coastal Erosion Permit and an Amendment to Wetlands Permit #474. The first application, filed 19 March 2001, relates to the water filtration shed; the second application, filed 4 April 2001, relates to the placement of approximately 138 10"x25' spiles along the north and south facing at the seaward-end of the wharf. Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code governs the Wetlands Permit process; Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code governs the Coastal Erosion Permit process. Each chapter of the Southold Town Code clearly sets out the requirements and process for obtaining a permit before undertaking any work We respectfully request that the shed application be denied for the following procedural and substantive reasons. With respect to the Coastal Erosion permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37-40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24 000)'; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480)— far too small to provide a basis for meaningful analysis. Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spites in Orient Harbor. In making these and subsequent points relating to Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §37-43 does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the `'minimum requirements necessary to carry out the purposes of the chanter". Additionally, a properly scaled map would clearly demonstrate that the proposed shed does not meet the Zoning requirements of§100-33. Specifically, the shed does not meet the requirements of§100-33(B) in that the shed is setback less than three (3) feet from the lot line. The application does not meet the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12. Specifically, under the requirement of§37-12(A) it can not be demonstrated and found "that the proposed regulated activity is reasonable and necessga, considering reasonable alternatives to the proposed activity and the extent to which the proposed activity requires a shoreline location". Permit us to state that we are not opposed to filtration, only filtration that is situated in an illegal structure and location. First, applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed activity is necessary in that all available water tests for Alachlor have been below the threshold for required remediation. Second, even if the need for filtration were to be demonstrated, applicant has a number of reasonable alternatives. As has been pointed out to applicant, these include placement of the filtration system at a location landward of the coastal erosion area; placement of the 1 filters within the building at the end of the wharf, provision of non-potable washdown water and bottled potable water with appropriate signage. In any consideration of these alternatives, it should additionally be recognized that the applicant does not need to bear the cost of remediation as it is bome by Monsanto. Having established that the applicant's proposed location for the shed is neither reasonable nor necessary, we would also point out that applicant's characterization of the structure as an "existing, temporary, portable 6'x8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment" is not accurate. Actually, under provisions of the Southold Town Code, the shed is neither legally existing, temporary or portable. Under §37-6 the definition of an existing structure is "a structure...where construction has not beeun but for which a building permit has been issued prior to the effective date of this chapter" [10-8-19911. Given that the shed does not have a building permit and was installed after the effective date [5-4-2000], it is incorrect to refer to it as "existing". Even if it is determined that the application meets the reasonable and necessary requirements of§37-12, the application does not meet the removable restrictions of §37-13. Specifically, §37-13(B) states that"within a structural hazard area the construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited". Under §37-6 and in as much as the shed is constructed upon a newly poured concrete floor it is not within the definition of being a"movable structure". Applicant's attorney conceded in his 15 February 2001 letter to the Town Attorney that the shed is located within the 'structural hazard area"'. Even if the applicant successfully argues that the shed is movable, then the application is incomplete in that it does not meet the relocation requirements of§37-13. Specifically, §37-13(F) requires that the application include "plans for landward relocation [to] be included with each application for a permit". Given the inability of the applicant to meet the standards and restrictions of Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, the applicant still has recourse to appeal and seek variances under §37-30. As an additional matter, we would also point out that the applicant has not met or recognized the need to meet the application and permit requirements of Chapter 46 of the Southold Town Code, relating to Flood Damage Prevention. And although we would note the administrator and implementer of this chapter is the Building Inspector, and not the Trustees, the classification of the proposed location of the shed as a"Zone VE" on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (Map Number 36103CO068 G) designates the proposed location of the shed as a coastal high-hazard area with a number of specific requirements to minimize the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. As currently situated and designed the shed is not in compliance with the basic requirements of Chapter 46 which would require that anything built in Zone VE be built in such a manner that the bottom floor joist be above a specified base flood elevation. Additionally, any supporting 2 structure below base flood elevation must be professionally designed and certified to be of a break-away design to reduce potential damage. As shown in the attached FIRM, the specified base flood elevation for the proposed location is eleven(11) feet. As shown on the topographic map furnished by the applicant, the shed as currently situated is at an elevation of six (6) feet, five feet below the required base flood elevation. As with Chapter 37 of the Southold Town Code, we would respectfully point out that §46-7 contains language that does not allow for discretionary flexibility in interpreting the provisions, regulations, procedures and standards of this chapter, but rather the code is to be interpreted as setting forth the "minimum requirements adopted for the Promotion of the public health, safety and welfare". With respect to the Wetland permit, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the requirements of§97-21(I) have not been met in that applicant has failed to accurately describe "any known prior operations conducted on the premises in question and whether any prior licenses or permits have been issued". Nor has the applicant referenced the pending Consent Order in the matter of NI SDEC vs. Orient II/harf Company, (NOV# 00 CA 168) and the recent imposition of a$50,000 fine by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for numerous instances of"substantial modification, installation and reconstruction without benefit of permit". Nor has the applicant met the requirements of §97-21(J) in providing "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". The application has not been processed properly under the requirements of§97-24. Specifically, the requirement of§97-24(A) for the Conservation Advisory Council "to forward its written report of findings and recommendations with respect to such application" has not been met, and under the requirement of§97-24(B) a public hearing on such application shall be held "upon receipt by the Trustees of the report of the Conservation Advisory Council". The application does not meet the negative determination requirements of§97-28. Specifically, the permit does not meet the requirement of§97-28(E) for a negative determination that granting of such permit "will not substantially increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage". In fact, the Zone VE designation of the proposed location of the shed, and the precautionary design and building requirements set forth in Chapter 46, clearly demonstrate the position of Southold Town that there is a significant danger of flood and storm-tide damage. In addition, we would respectfully point out that the applicant has failed to meet the requirements of Chapter 100 of the Southold Town Code. Specifically, §100-111 provides that planning board site approval is required for any non-residential structure— whether principal or accessory— in the M 1 district where the wharf is located and the shed is placed. 3 Finally, it is our understanding that New York's General Municipal Law §239-m and Suffolk County Charter §§1323 to 1332 require a referral by local agencies of all applications for"authorizations which a referring body may issue under the provisions of any...local law" where the proposed action(construction of a shed) will be, among other examples, within 500 feet of any bay in Suffolk County. For the reasons set forth above, and noting that nearly one year has passed since the illegal placement of the shed, we respectfully request that the Trustees deny the application and under provisions of§97-31 instruct the Bay Constable to require immediate compliance and to order the removal of the structure with the imposition of fines as specified in §97-33 for any delay in complying with such order. With respect to the spite placement application,we respectfully request that the spile placement application be deferred and held over for the following procedural and substantive issues have been correctly addressed. As with the first application, the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§37-40. Specifically, the minimum information requirements of§37- 40(A)(2) have not been met. The scale specified for the required map is "no smaller than one to twenty-four thousand (1:24 000)'; the map and drawings submitted by applicant are in one case (1:240) and in another(1:480). Failure to include a properly scaled map does not enable the Trustees or the public to properly evaluate the application. Additionally, as stated previously, the topographic map included as part of applicant's submission is misleading in that it does not accurately portray the actual placement and location of additional spiles in Orient Harbor. The application does not meet the environmental review requirement of§37-46. Specifically, given the size and scope of the proposed regulated activity, the application does not address `_the review Procedures required by the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEOR) Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law". Additionally, we question the scope and extent of the engineering work and believe prudence requires a professional engineer's report to determine the foundation structure of the rock/stone pier and whether it is feasible to make a 5'-to-6' penetration of the bay bottom in a straight and continuous line along the north and south facing at the seaward- end of the wharf. In addition, we note the applicant recognizes and acknowledges the need to obtain permit approval from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. However, given the applicant's repeated history of failing to obtain required permits, we would point out that the application is incomplete under the information requirements of§97-21. Specifically, the applicant has not met the requirement of§97-21(J) to provide "documentary proof that all other necessary permits and approvals have been obtained". 4 Respectfully Submitted. 5 ,„mare s< PMW� ® 1� Il II 11 �1 I� ® 1� y>caL aide of timber P)a (109 fed) � N - I � W , FtreO r/ � o S o/ , rkpBar 0 Y 1♦ / / y4 1: J FlooL5 F WW ��Lqe 54�yaoe 4\d x Float Y \ �PprM1S r/ LL 1B 704 • � 'b �y .- alum � ______ _ _ __ ^~ �a Frome Building 0 Y �el°••n O L T, ' ed Aspholt Surface over Stone Pier Derck on ° — store Pler y ��p� rti (7.r & a.o a Prepared for: ® � Il n 1111 a ir lU�¶� ® � Orient Village WharfLane Company u P.O. Box 243 Proposed: Remove 54 pilings from west Orient,NY 11957 ` side of timber pier and relocate to north side Scale 1" =40' \ . of solid rock/stone pier install aproximately g4 Prepared by: Pilings on south side of existing solid rock/stone Susan E. Long Permits pier. Pilings to be placed immediately adjacent to each other to armor and fortify the existing P.O. Box 46 rock/stone pier against storm waves and ice damage East Marion,NY 11939-0046 (631)477-3455 Page 1 of March 31, 2001 eL ORIENT FoI Xk k" p 10 I A'tEy' D!; P^.•.Cl//J c , :hY 0 F<wed d u0 v�, ` La CU 5 �'"1/V 133 Y lltl m. ri 7'c� , l40 X001 [f. SOUE rr a C[nrvv Y A C 4. Orient Y C. +cif _ ,q c N i Apt 4V C/�-A-27 h- \ �� � ,yam IZ.g m+, NAY I os evp f vlllaye L I�J I T 0.212 N.Fr \TM20thy& zw ost PIQ R 233 Fat 691h Street \ VARIES Apt. 14,0 'mac Awl Sd' New Yak,NY IOD21 w IDC / m j M EkIST/NG LONG LL 8'/t- 10/PILIroGS i1 FR^lye ' P_xISTING TIPiBEIE DEck 6LID CK sT SIDE of r 6UILDING ON ILOCK S'foNE_ PIER 56LID ROCK STONa p1LR s PILING 5-4' PCN ETRATInN 1 y`p (11Et Gtir N.T,S =N51ALL S1 1{ 'PIUNG5 FtLoNG N R H stbE OF q,s SOLID ROCK STONE PIER 7E 10' PILIN G I S ' PENETRATION V I Eyd SOLID Rotk`STe14E - SW-F_ 1 N= 20/ PIER 7S ',3,D1 z5 PILINCtIN6�o�ER�NISteNEPIER Ro �L L 45 r.. 8A OTT CORTINdoUS CO NrINUoo$ Plllry6$ ---yl PILINGS f'_ PENV R�TIat.1 5-4 ('RDNT- V1EW SCALE = d0 Prepared for: Prepared by: Orient Wharf Company Susan E. Long Permits Village Lane P.O. Box 46 P.O. Box 243 East Marion,NY 11939-0046 Orient, NY 11957 (631)477-3455 Page 2 of 2 March 31, 2001 TOPOGRAPHIG MAP "THE ORIENT WHARF" 51TUATE: ORIENT TO : 5OUTH E 5UF O�LK GOUNTY, NYY S 5URVEYED 09-08-99 R ELEVATION5 SHOM HEREON ARE J/1 REFERENCED TO M.5L. N6V0'29 ps SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX R 1000 - 24 - 2 - 28.1 m � 6 � FrPoI S F�°atf III 1 S R O � t • Y , o r_ an n Emm I ASPholt r as over rJt --_- e .mn•, --. - � 0 one - - x Pier Of NpC. h Il Il 3 i s_ \ 1 S _ n Sep LAND JOHN C. EHLERS SURVEYOR 6 EAST MAIN STREET N.Y.S.LiC.NO.50202 GRAPHIG 5GALE .RNERFMAAD,N.Y. 11901 - 1694211 Fu 169-1217 REF,_'I7GERIPROS\warf2 �gpFF01.f JEAN W. COCHRAN GREGORY F.YAKABOSKI y.� 0 Supervisor TOWN ATTORNEY o y s Town Hall, 53095 Route 25 nt P.O. Box 1179 MARY C. WILSON i:p Southold, New York 11971-0959 ASSISTANT TOWN ATTORNEY y�o! �aO� Telephone (631) 765-1889 Fax (631) 765-1823 E-mail: townattorneyCasouthold.org OFFICE OF THE TOWN ATTORNEY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 20, 2000 DEC 2 I At Krupski, President Southold Town Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, New York 11971 RE: water filtration equipment shed Dear Mr. Krupski: You questioned whether a 6' by 8' shed which houses water filtration equipment located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area is permitted by the Southold Town Code. According to the Code, once it has been established that the land in question is situated within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area, a determination then must be made whether the real property in question is within one of the sub-areas designated as: the structural hazard area, nearshore area, beach area, dune area or bluff area. Each of the sub-areas is defined with in the Code at §37-6. If the wharf area in question is within the"structural hazard area" as defined in the Code, it appears the water filtration shed is permitted provided it can be considered a movable structure as required by §37-13. However, if the real property in question is located in what is defined as "nearshore area" or what is defined as"beach area" in the Code, all development is prohibited unless otherwise provided for in the Coastal Erosion Hazard. I hope this clarifies the Code. Please feel free to contact our office if there any questions. Sincerely C. ilson Assistant Town Attorney Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 37-6. Definitions. The following terms, as used in the chapter, shall have the meanings indicated, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: ADMINISTRATOR-- The local officials responsible for administrating and enforcing this chapter. The Southold Town Board of Trustees is hereby designated as the "Administrator." BEACH -- The zone of unconsolidated earth that extends landward from the mean low-water line to the waterward toe of a dune or bluff, whichever is most waterward. Where no dune or bluff exists landward of a beach, the landward limit of a beach is one hundred(100) feet landward from the place where there is a marked change in material or physiographic form or from the line of permanent vegetation, whichever is most waterward. Shorelands subject to seasonal or more frequent overwash or inundation are considered to be "beaches." BLUFF -- Any bank or cliff with a precipitous or steeply sloped face adjoining a beach or a body of water. The waterward limit of a bluff is the landward limit of its waterward natural protective feature. Where no beach is present, the waterward limit of a bluff is mean low water. The landward limit is twenty-five (25) feet landward of the receding edge or, in those cases where there is no discernible line of active erosion, twenty-five (25) feet landward of the point of inflection on the top of the bluff. The "point of inflection" is that point along the top of the bluff where the trend of the land slope changes to begin its descent to the shoreline. COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA MAP -- The final map and any amendments thereof issued by the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which delineates boundaries of coastal erosion hazard areas subject to regulation under this chapter. COASTAL WATERS -- Long Island Sound and its connecting water bodies, bays, harbors, shallows and marshes. COASTLINE -- The lands adjacent to the Town of Southold's coastal waters. DEBRIS LINE -- A linear accumulation of waterborne debris deposited on a beach by storm induced high water or by wave action. DUNE -- A ridge or hill of loose, windblown or artificially placed earth, the principal component of which is sand. EROSION -- The loss or displacement of land along the coastline due to the action of waves, currents, wind-driven water, waterborne ice or other impacts of storms. It also means the loss or displacement of land due to the action of wind, runoff of surface waters or groundwaters, or groundwater seepage. 1 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows EROSION HAZARD AREA-- An area of the coastline which is a structural hazard area or a natural protective feature area. EROSION PROTECTION STRUCTURE -- A structure specifically designed to reduce or prevent erosion, such as a groin,jetty, revetment, breakwater or artificial beach nourishment project. EXISTING STRUCTURE -- A structure and appurtenances in existence, or one where construction has commenced, or one where construction has not begun but for which a building permit has been issued prior to the effective date of the chapter. GRADING -- A redistribution of sand or other unconsolidated earth to effect a change in profile. MAJOR ADDITION -- An addition to a structure resulting in a twenty-five-percent or greater increase in the ground area coverage of the structure other than an erosion protection structure or a pier, dock or wharf. The increase will be calculated as the ground area coverage to be added, including any additions previously constructed under a coastal erosion management permit, divided by the ground area coverage of the existing structure, as defined in "existing structure" above. MEAN LOW WATER-- The approximate average low-water level for a given body of water at a given location, determined by reference to hydrological information concerning water levels or other appropriate tests. MOVABLE STRUCTURE -- A structure designed and constructed to be readily relocated with minimum disruption of the intended use. Mobile homes and structures built on skids or piles and which do not have a permanent foundation are examples of"movable structures." NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE -- A nearshore area, beach, bluff, primary dune, secondary dune or marsh and their vegetation. NATURAL PROTECTIVE FEATURE AREA-- A land and/or water area containing natural protective features the alteration of which might reduce or destroy the protection afforded other lands against erosion or high water or lower the reserve of sand or other natural materials available to replenish storm losses through natural processes. NEARSHORE AREA-- Those lands under water beginning at the near low-water line and extending waterward in a direction perpendicular to the shoreline to a point where mean low-water depth is fifteen(15) feet or to a horizontal distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the mean low-water line, whichever is greater. NORMAL MAINTENANCE -- Periodic replacement or repair of same-kind structural elements or protective coatings which do not change the size, design or function of a functioning structure. A"functioning structure" is one which is fully performing as originally designed at the time that normal maintenance is scheduled to begin. "Normal maintenance" of a structure does not require a 2 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows § 37-13. Structural hazard area. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities within structural hazard areas: A. A coastal erosion management permit is required for the installation of public service distribution,transmission or collection systems for gas, electricity, water or wastewater. Systems installed along the shoreline must be located landward of the shoreline structures. B. The construction of nonmovable structures or placement of major nonmovable additions to an existing structure is prohibited. C. Permanent foundations may not be attached to movable structures, and any temporary foundations are to be removed at the time the structure is moved. Below-grade footings will be allowed if satisfactory provisions are made for their removal. D. No movable structure may be located closer to the landward limit of a bluff than twenty-five (25) feet. E. No movable structure may be placed or constructed such that according to accepted engineering practice, its weight places excessive groundloading on a bluff. F. Plans for landward relocation of movable structures must be included with each application for a permit. Movable structures which have been located within a structural hazard area pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit must be removed before any part of the structure is within ten(10) feet of the receding edge. The last owner of record, as shown on the latest assessment roll, is responsible for removing that structure and its foundation, unless a removal agreement was attached to the original coastal erosion management permit. With the attachment of a removal agreement to the coastal erosion management permit, the landowner or the signatory is responsible for the landward relocation of movable structures. Removal agreements may be made when the last owner of record and the owner of the structure are different, with the approval of the town at the time the permit is issued. G. Debris from the structural damage which may occur as a result of sudden unanticipated bluff edge failure, dune migration or wave or ice action must be removed within sixty(60) days of the damaging event. H. Any grading, excavation or other soil disturbance conducted within a structural hazard area must not direct surface water runoff over a bluff face. § 37-14. Nearshore area. Nearshore areas dissipate a substantial amount of wave energy before it is expended on beaches, bluffs or dunes by causing waves to collapse or break. Nearshore areas also function as reservoirs 1 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows of sand, gravel and other unconsolidated material for beaches. Sandbars, which are located in nearshore areas, control the orientation of incoming waves and promote the development of ice cap formations which help protect shorelines during winter storms. The roots of aquatic vegetation in nearshore areas bind fine grained silts, clays and organic matter to form a fairly cohesive bottom that resists erosion. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in nearshore areas: A. Excavating, grading, mining or dredging which diminishes the erosion protection afforded by nearshore areas is prohibited, except construction or maintenance of navigation channels, bypassing sand around natural and man-made obstructions and artificial beach nourishment, all of which require a coastal erosion management permit. B. Clean sand or gravel of an equivalent or slightly larger grain size is the only material which may be deposited within nearshore areas. Any deposition will require a coastal erosion management permit. C. All development is prohibited in nearshore areas unless specifically provided for by this chapter. § 37-15. Beach area. Beaches buffer shorelands from erosion by absorbing wave energy that otherwise would be expended on the toes of bluffs or dunes. Beaches that are high and wide protect shorelands from erosion more effectively than beaches that are low or narrow. Beaches also act as reservoirs of sand or other unconsolidated material for longshore littoral transport and offshore sandbar and shoal formation. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in beach areas: A. Excavating, grading or mining which diminishes the erosion protection afforded by beaches is prohibited. B. Clean sand or gravel of an equivalent or slightly larger grain size is the only material which may be deposited within beach areas. Any deposition will require a coastal erosion management permit, which may be issued only for expansion or stabilization of beaches. C. Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. D. All development is prohibited on beaches unless specifically provided for by this chapter. § 37-16. Dune area. Dunes prevent overtopping and store sand for coastal processes. High, vegetated dunes provide a greater degree of protection than low, unvegetated ones. Dunes are of the greatest protective 2 Town of Southold PGCodebook for Windows value during conditions of storm-induced high water. Because dunes often protect some of the most biologically productive areas as well as developed coastal areas, their protective value is especially great. The key to maintaining a stable dune system is the establishment and maintenance of beachgrass or other vegetation on the dunes and assurance of a supply of nourishment sand to the dunes. The following restrictions apply to regulated activities in dune areas: A. In primary dune areas: (1) Excavating, grading or mining of primary dunes is prohibited. (2) Clean sand of a compatible type and size is the only material which may be deposited. Any deposition requires a coastal erosion management permit. (3) All depositions must be vegetatively stabilized using species tolerant of the conditions at the site and must be placed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or dune area. (4) Active bird nesting and breeding areas must not be disturbed, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. (5) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on primary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit and subject to permit conditions concerning the location, design and potential impacts of the structure on the primary dune. (6) Stone revetments or other erosion protection structures compatible with primary dunes will only be allowed at the waterward toe of primary dunes and must not interfere with the exchange of sand between primary dunes and their fronting beaches. B. In secondary dune areas: (1) All depositions must be of clean sand of a compatible type and size, and all grading must be performed so as to increase the size of, or restore, a dune or former dune area. (2) Excavating, grading or mining must not diminish the erosion protection afforded by them. (3) Nonmajor additions to existing structures are allowed on secondary dunes pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit. (4) Permitted construction, reconstruction, restoration or modifications must be built on adequately anchored pilings such that at least three (3) feet of open space exists between the floor joists and the surface of the secondary dune; and the permitted activity must leave the space below the lowest horizontal structural members free of obstructions. C. All other activities and developments in dune areas are prohibited unless specifically provided for by this chapter. 3 Town of Southold PC/Codebookfor Windows D. The restrictions of§ 37-19, Traffic control, apply to dune areas. § 37-17. Bluff area. Bluffs protect shorelands and coastal development by absorbing the often destructive energy of open water. Bluffs are a source of depositional material for beaches and other unconsolidated natural protective features. A. The following activities are prohibited on bluffs: (1) Excavating or mining, except when in conjunction with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for minor alterations in construction of an erosion protection structure or for provision of shoreline access. (2) The restrictions of§ 37-19, Traffic control, apply to bluffs. (3) All development unless specifically allowed by § 37-17B of this chapter. (4) Disturbance of active bird nesting and breeding areas, unless such disturbance is pursuant to a specific wildlife management activity approved, in writing, by the Department. (5) Soil disturbance that directs surface water runoff over a bluff face. B. Activities specifically allowed under this section are: (1) Minor alteration of a bluff done in accordance with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for new construction, modification or restoration of an erosion protection structure. (2) Bluff cuts done in accordance with conditions stated in a coastal erosion management permit issued for the provision of shoreline access, where: (a) The cut is made in a direction perpendicular to the shoreline. (b) The ramp slope may not exceed one to six (1:6). (c) The side slopes may not exceed one to three (1:3), unless terraced or otherwise structurally stabilized. (d) The side slopes and other disturbed nonroadway areas must be stabilized with vegetation or other approved physical means. (e) The completed roadway must be stabilized and drainage provided for. (3) New construction, modification or restoration of walkways or stairways done in accordance with conditions of a coastal erosion management permit. 4 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows (4) Nonmajor additions to existing structures on bluffs, pursuant to a coastal erosion management permit. § 37-18. Erosion protection structures. 5 Town of Southold PC/Codebook for Windows to the shoreline a horizontal distance landward which is forty(40) times the long-term average annual recession rate. STRUCTURE -- Any object constructed, installed or placed in, on or under land or water, including but not limited to a building;permanent shed; deck; in-ground and aboveground pool; garage; mobile home; road; public service distribution, transmission or collection system; tank; dock;pier;wharf; groin;jetty; seawall; bulkhead; breakwater; revetment; artificial beach nourishment; or any addition to or alteration of the same. TOE -- The lowest surface point on a slope face of a dune or bluff. UNREGULATED ACTIVITY -- Excepted activities which are not regulated by this chapter include but are not limited to elevated walkways or stairways constructed solely for pedestrian use and built by an individual property owner for the limited purposes of providing noncommercial access to the beach; docks, piers, wharves or structures built on floats, columns, open timber piles or other similar open work supports with a top surface area of less than two hundred (200) square feet or which are removed in the fall of each year; normal beach grooming or cleanup; maintenance of structures when normal and customary and/or in compliance with an approved maintenance program; planting vegetation and sand fencing so as to stabilize or entrap sand in primary dune and secondary dune areas in order to maintain or increase the height and width of dunes; routine agricultural operations, including cultivation or harvesting; and the implementation of practices recommended in a soil and water conservation plan as defined in § 3, Subsection(12), of the Soil and Water Conservation Districts Law; provided, however, that agricultural operations and implementation of practices will not be construed to include any activity that involves the construction or placement of a structure. VEGETATION -- Plant life capable of surviving and successfully reproducing in the area or region and which is compatible with the environment of the coastal erosion hazard area. §§ 37-7 through 37-9. (Reserved) ARTICLE II, Regulations 4 Town of Southold PGCodebook for Windows coastal erosion management permit. PERSON -- Any individual, public or private corporation, political subdivision, government agency, public improvement district, partnership, association, firm, trust, estate or any other legal entity whatsoever. PRIMARY DUNE -- The most waterward major dune where there are two (2) or more parallel dunes within a coastal area. Where there is only one (1) dune present, it is the "primary" one. Occasionally one (1) or more relatively small dune formations exist waterward of the primary dune. These smaller formations will be considered to be part of the "primary dune" for the purposes of this chapter. The waterward limit of a primary dune is the landward limit of its fronting beach. The landward limit of the primary dune is twenty-five (25) feet landward of its landward toe. RECEDING EDGE -- The most landward line of active erosion or, in cases where there is no discernible line of active erosion, the most waterward line of permanent vegetation. RECESSION RATE -- The rate, expressed in feet per year, at which an eroding shoreline moves landward. REGULATED ACTIVITY -- The construction, modification, restoration or placement of structure, or major addition to a structure, or any action or use of land which materially alters the condition of land, including grading, excavating, dumping, mining, dredging, filling or other disturbance of soil. RESTORATION -- The reconstruction without modification of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the estimated full replacement cost of the structure at the time of restoration. Modifications, however, may be allowed if they do not exceed preexisting size limits and are intended to mitigate impacts to natural protective features and other natural resources. SECONDARY DUNE -- The major dune immediately landward of the primary dune. The waterward limit of a secondary dune is the landward limit of its fronting primary dune. The landward limit of a"secondary dune" is twenty-five (25) feet landward of its landward toe. SIGNIFICANT FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT -- Those habitats which are essential to the survival of a large portion of a particular fish or wildlife population; support rare or endangered species; are found at a very low frequency within a geographic area; support fish or wildlife populations having significant commercial or recreational value; or that would be difficult or impossible to replace. STRUCTURAL HAZARD AREA-- Those shorelands located landward of natural protective features and having shorelines receding at a long-term average recession rate of one(1) foot or more per year. The inland boundary of a "structural hazard area" is calculated by starting at the landward limit of the fronting natural protective feature and measuring along a line perpendicular 3 • ORIGINAL �OCam`': Town Hall Albert J. Krupski, President 53095 Mein Road James King, Vice-President P.O. Box 1179 Henry Smith CD y = ( Southold, New York 11971 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda y� � ) Telephone(516) 765-1892 Oj �aF64i' Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD R� LETTER OF REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT DATE _ A?R) L A . abol OWNER OR.I rLNTWHA9 E CDMPANu PHONE f(.31_) 3a3- ain RTTE TI 01q: 1-I NTON OUWL", pRq$IDFNT ADDRESS !-o.gol 2U O EntT N\I I I G s-z AGENT S S-L -PERMITS PHONE ( 3i1 7r7 P.O • ;Bo 7X 4(. J ADDRESS 5AST MARION I Ny 410 PROPERTY LOCATION U ILL/-6 F__ TAX i\4APNO. looms - I/We OR I r N T 1 HAR K D request an Amendment to Permit #_� To REMOVE 51 P/LIN6S FROM W65T- S IDE OF TII-IBFp _IEiZ f}p}'b tzEl.00 WTE- TO NORTH S ID - of SOL( Z STORF-I ROCK .LNSTAIL Ppp�xlM!>TF_L4 %y P/LINES ory SOUTH 51bE of F—)(ISTINC Soup STONE � Rocl� P I EP, . C Signed By: �` C�.1 w • 0 COPY TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD,NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No. .474............ has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No. .,594 filed by Applicant, ient, W.hA f...Qg npany ................... .......... on .....11 AA7....• lg A ma of the proposed work will be kept'••'• P P PIII on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following work.....To extend a float•arrangementS,Q!,••py...4dd7Ag..kwo 6...x 20' floats with 5,5!„x 20' "T"................................... .....................Q..F.........d..f,..5...x...4......7C....and............add.................. B pilings. . ................................................................................................................................................................ Location of property on which work to be done....Orient.Harborr,_Main„& 4ilig.......................... Street, Orient. ................................................................................................................................................................. _............................................................................................................................................................... Creek,Bay or Harbor fronting property Orient Harbor ................................................................................................................................................................. Size of work: Length ....z......ZQ'._floa . with 5 -.•20„!!T;'„.andf.„- 5!, "T" Width 2 - 6' floats with 5- . 5' "T" and 1 - 4' "T" Height Above High Water ---'------- ----------- DepthBelow Low Water ................................................................................................. Yardsto be Excavated..............n/a................................................................................ Yards to be Filled n/a ......................................................................................................... Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ..n/a ............................................................................_................................................................................... Intended use of property......Industrial ................................................................................................................................................................. Conditions if an ------ ................................................................................................................................................................. Expiration Date work has not commenced by 25air1, date. Number of Inspections Revired ......-....rustees_ark„tR...11.g,..[lf?F.lf7.fd..upost................................... completion of the work. Inspection Fees ....$10:00 . ............................:........................................................................................ Liability Policies in the Amount of ..... ;"-:- ;-•••-•;-.-.-• ......................................... The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such otherapproval when reo6ired shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon receipt by the Trustees of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. Board of Trustees Application ORIGINAL COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity:_1r) AR" r)12. -4- 1=U gT 1 FBI �-ri f n I N G SnLln �T�NFIRboj- 7PIFt2 FROM STOKNI wi1 S Try Df}M hr. E Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? ✓ No Yes 'NO UF-r-FT"RTiwr Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated?_(cubic yards) How much material will be filled? nl (A• (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: p IL I N Gs L� I i Ll 13L =1`41-rALLEn WITa '25ARG1 CP.AlJF Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) —NEroATIIs r- EFF Ft-r Tb IL1E ENUIROIJ tA T 12- oR t l Apr 25 01 11 : 45a Su fWA E. Long 510-477-3455 p. 2 Albert J. Krupski, President �gpFF04 Town Hall James King, Vice-President 0 Henry Smith �� Gy 53095 Route 25 e3 P.O. Box 1179 Artie Foster w = Southold, New York 11971-0959 Ken Poliwoda `� y Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ----------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of -or-12►_ mrm __C.Q1------------ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NT0 residing at QRI rNT N If %AI `[ ot? vc_ being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the J7Thday ofAPRIL , 200t , I personally posted the property known as pRt- ��)EFAKF ('.DAAPAN V by placing the Board of Trustees official post r where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of he r public h arin Date of hearing noted thereon to be held �o�J,aca _mom. �i M pm . Dated: signat e SwoKn to before me this ,25"' day of A'pRls` 2001 Notary Pubse,State Newyork NO-OIQualified in Suffolk Co n Notary Public Commission Expi res November �p,� Albert J. Krupski,President �QgUFFO(�CO • Town Hall 0 53095 Route 25 James King,Vice-President = Gy� P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith cmSouthold, New York 11971-0959 w Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda • 'F Telephone(631) 765-1892 Fax(631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ----------------------------------- In the Matter of the Application of _aC7PY1�_WYM-k ______________ COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I , J. Kevin McLaughlin , residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, NY being duly sworn, depose and say: That on the 27th day Of March , 2001 , I personally posted the property known as 2110 Village Lane Orient NY (SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001) by placing the Board of Trustees official poster where it can easily be seen, and that I have checked to be sure the poster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date of the public 4earing. D to of hearing noted thereon to be held(JAhI aS10IDDI monftw Dated: (si ure) J. Ke 'n McLaughlin Sworn to before me this Z,5 day of April 2001 Not r Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01 ST6008173,Suffolk County Term Expires June 8,204;--� NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Orient Wharf Co. SCTM#1000- 024.00-02.00-028.001 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: Coastal 1 . That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Erosion Permit from the Board of Trustees to: allow the existing 61 x 81 shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply has been obtained. 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review-is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows : Orient Wharf Co. property commonly (mown as 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 3 . That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: 4/25/01 You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal . OWNERS NAME : Orient Wharf Co. MAILING ADDRESS: c/o J, R-ev-in--m-EL-a-ugTilin, Esq., P.O. Box 1210,i Southo , PHONE # : 6 /00-oudn Enc. : . Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. S PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address: David & Claire L. Air #12P, 315 8th Avenue, New York, NY 10001 SCTM # 1000-024.00-02.00-027.000 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 SCTM #1000-026.00-01.00-001.001 and c/o Pay House, P.O. Pox 636, Orient, NY 11957 Timothy T. Frost & Nina Frost Apt. #14-0, 233 East 69th Street, New.York, NY 10021 SCTM #1000-025.00-03.00-012.001 and c/o Pay House, P.O. Box 636, Orient, NY 11957 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK J. KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN , residing at 680 Old Orchard Lane, East Marion, New York , being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the day of March, 2001 ;0S!{ , deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at Southold, New York , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons,/by (c ied) (registered) mail . J - v „'\ ttr Sworn to before me this day of lftrcb, 2001 ,T9 Notary Public ELIZABETH A STATHIS NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.01 ST6008173,Suffolk County Term Expires June 8,20-9Z _t F::.,p_k,. Preadent 4' $UFFO( Tu,cn HMI - 53095 Route _� FL:.r. =m,th P O Box 1179 Cm Southold, Ne« Y�,rk 11t+-1. ric 1'.J q..f r H } _ O T :ti F_,I,:,.,,.L, Fax ; 1 7g3-L:i,3n BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES ORIGINAL TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only _ oro stal Erosion Permit Application \\etland Permit Application _ Major Minor _\�airer'Amendment Chan7es -'Recer,ed Application._ cei ed Fee S. Inb sC"ornpleted Application q14101 SEQR:\ Classification 1 ,pe I Type II Unlisted _ Coordination )date sent ✓C.\C Rztrrral Sent b ✓Oate of Inspection -- _ _ Receipt of CAC Report Lead -\_enc� Determination --Technical Re%ic%s _ ✓Public Hearing Held (� Resolution Narnc oCA p ,plicant - S p( 1 PANsI ATTENT-topq - Lit-4 oN DUEL.L, "FRF- SIDF_ NT- Jd!c<> P•O , 8 OX o?4 3 Tp�31_ECLT i— N� S� -- Phone Number 1 SoL 333 _ IS �d— ----- i.,rlc,IL. COunt\ l a\ Map Number I1-100 - '2 — a$, I - - Pr:,pzrz, L.-catiorl VI LL Aar--r /� fJ � ,_.0 R 1 ENT prr, de LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets. and location) \GENT SLVSAN F , LONG -p r-rzM 11S � li;,ppl�cablel Boa*f Trustees Application • County of Suffolk State of New York 'P �0 N G BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID. PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS ,, DAY OF kr co p a-a Notary Public" CLAIRE L.GLEW Notary public,State of New York No.01GL4879505 Qualified in Suffolk Co Commission Expires Dec.8, 7 1a.!6-12/871—Text 12 . PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C SEC State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) !. APPLICANT(SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME EAMOUNTOF ECT LOCATION;unicipalityISE LOCATION (Sreet aooresa ano roan intersections, prominent lanomarCoun KF_A MA+ l SH6WNotjPROTECT PLAµS OPOSED ACTION:New ❑Expanslon ZMooiticalloNafter,tio, IBE PROJECT BRQom`T OF LAND AFFEyacres UltimatelygOPOSE!rD��ACTION COMPLY WITHcres Ex137tNG ZONIN OR OT`(STING L,1N0 USE RESTRICTIONS?s 0 No If No.describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY�OF PROJECT? IZReapanllal C IndU31rial r — oescnbe: Commercial ❑Agriculture VVAT E R F P_o N T U ParK FonsVOoan space Olner 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPgpypl STATE OR LOCAU7 ��e• NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL. l Yas l -DE.9AL, ❑No If yea,Ilsl agenby(a)and pvmlUapprovala NyS DE C r A�My CUrlpSr 56UTfiDLp `TpwrN `r)�-USTF-F-S It. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR AppgOygLT ❑Yes WNo If yea, list agency name and permittap proval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL E:(ISTING PE fur RMIT/gppROVAL REOVIRE .NOOIFICAiION7 ❑Yes LCd No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appucanusppnsor name: IZM ITS signature: I( the action is in the COastal Area, and you are a state acency, complete the Coastal Assessmen! Form before proceeding with this aUefsment OVER 1 AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: - 7^ 0 (street address) located at (town & state) do hereby give Susan E. Long Permits the authority to act as agent on my behalf in applying for all necessary permits for work to be done on my property described above. Slgfttmre— APR 2 3 PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Name: Address : U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT U.S. Postal Service (Domestic Mail Only, No Insurance Coverage Provided) CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT r-1 Article sent To: (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance coverage Provided) 11 m 1 PORK,7 10001 CO 10 n ru Postage $ IT I orn NEW YORK, NY 10021 n 1,90 Sd Sn n Postage $ 4 _ Certified!Fee rl �g3 e-. Retum Receipt Fee T PCslrAark r certified Fee 1.90 ` C3 (Entlorsement Required) ie N f N Return Receipt Fee �A O Restricted Delvery Fee % k: �/ (Endorsement Required - O� ere O (Entlorsement Requusd) % , ., 01;1i d� 7 Restrlgetl Delivery Fea u O Total Postage&Fees $ r,,•ll ,�)^`a ] (Entlorsement Re,W- / J _ D Total Postage&Fees � sd� fll Alm.(Please Print clearly)(Te 6e cI:11M, etl6y mailer) J m RAC Lq CL o-- A�� Name(Please Pr t C/eerlYl Q Street,APf.N 'or PO Oder N . _ ------------ --- -- ----------------•------ T roma/lar T MQ7 F{ __ -�1-�NA.....F Ro 5�'-��-_ Street,APi.No.;ar PO Box No. - - - --J--------------------- M1 StySt.x o'9 €x� = Apr «- ---------------• YL .foRk p STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK -PAU L {}K- , residing at M>r 1� Fo D being duly sworn, deposes and says that on the 13r"'k day of JGQJ deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set forth in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Notices were mailed at the United States Post Office at FACT M>4R)W , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons by (certified) (registered) mail . C Sworn to before me this 7-h _ dayof �R 1 C a1®oQ�_ N0i Ps bl gtee of LONG Now York 343 Qualfied nLS�olk County A Notary Public 1 c ubn Et�ires November 6,2M No NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: OR iE_NY \A1 "8R E CoAPAhlu SCTM#1000 ay a as YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1 . That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: REM6VE Sy PILINGS F90H W6.S"f SIDE of TIMeeR PIER AHD Rr-k0cRTE To NoRTk S I bE OF S"I o STDNEI R6CK PIER. srfsrv4lC APPROXIMgTELy $4 PILINGS ON SOUTH SIDE OF 67XI3TINC Sol-ID STONE, ROCK P(E12, ' 2 . That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review.-is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows : pXIENT WHARF G6MPAN V I L LAG E L..A N E- Y ORIENT, N4 119S7 3 . That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32 , 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: y-AS-o1 You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal . OWNERS NAME: JHARF O t4 MAILING ADDRESS : ado SUSHAI E . LON6�PERAI,ITS e 39-ooS�y PHONE # : !o Enc . : Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. ,move X p�ao aam pw ram, dp N o° �X 13pl101rg AsPh Surface olt over I°• I'i � Stone Pier _ - - wormy NW-- Pbllam M.b< ft Kpl �[] Prepared for: . `, ® � Il e n t H NS s]I ir b ® r Orient Wharf Company U Village Lane ',o Propaeed: Remove 54 pling crow vest P.O.Box 243 rude dtim&r Per and rtlacaze to Orieot,NY 11957 m of solid ck/crone pier. h atall ap�mrimately 84 Scale I a" =4o pdiw on sm&side Ofexisting solid rock/smne Per Pilings to be placed immdaely adjacent Prepared by: to each onc-ro armor and faury tt. Susan E. Long Permits roek/s[Orle Per agavW alarm wusbng vases and is damage P.O.Box 46 East Marion,NY 11939-0046 Page 1 r March 31,2001 (631)477-3455 FART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ll&SSESSIMENT (To be comoleted by Agency A. ODES AC'IDN EXCEED ANY THRESHOLD IN 6 "CAR. OART 617 12v a ya ramate Ine renew procasa ana use the FuL, c L yes L NO '- 1+I1LL ACTION RECEIVE COOK DINAiED REVIEIa AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS ,N may Oe suoersecea oy another Involved agency. 6 .V YCRR, PART �.,57 ,I No a necat-a aec a a L Yes ❑NO COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE F—UYYITIG. (Answers me, to nanownllen. I •eq•clel Ct Ex sl,ng air qu autY. surface or groundwater quality or Quantity, noise levels, existing Irafllc patterns, sons waste dI OOCLon c, Potential for erosion, drainage Or hooding proolems? Explain oriefly: - C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or Other natural or cultural resources; or community or nelgnbornOoa cnarac:el'1 Exp,d.n _' a C3 vegetation or fauna. 1ls A, shbldlsh or wllcllle species, significant habitats. Or tnreatenea or endangered species? Exoldm oneny' CA. A community's existing pfdns or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Ex Dian p. C5. Growth, subseduent development, or related activities likely to Oe Induced Oy the proposed action? Explam onelly C5. Long term, snort farm, cumulative. or other effects not identifiec in C1'C57 Explain briefly. Diner Imoacls (Incwaing changes In use Of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. S THERE. CH i5 THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL !MPACTS� _. yes L NO If Yes. explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) i NSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect Identified above,determine whether it Is substantial,large. Important or olnerwlse sly,1 �,- cacn effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (I.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occbtjng; (c) dur3Lo irreversibility; (a) geographic scope; and (Q magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supponing materials. urat n, ,o explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately accressec Checx this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse imDac:s mcn MAY Occur. Then proceed directly to (he FULL EAF and/Or prepare a Positive declaration, CtieCx this box if you have determined, based on the Information and analysis above ano any SUOOCr, d AND o Ovldeo attachments rpase ecessary`vtthe reaa onsssupporting tlhislDetertminnation:adverseenvlronmenct mcac�� \..r.ri. nl LL'JJ AyInCY O, ,C u.nl.o! VIIIC t( n ll'.rd A�L'n CY I•tl!Or N.\port l.ob I,:er I'Cnaiure Of k1100mrOlf II,CCI .n LtaO nCtnCY ,that Yre JI Jrt OJltl 111 dnie.[nl IIOT rl1JGn..G.! i .[ 2 • �SUFFO(,� Albert J.Krupski,President �O CO Town Hall James King,Vice-President 53095 Main Road y P.O.Box 1179 Henry Smith W Southold,New York 11971 Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Telephone(516) 765-18.92 Fax(516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only X Coastal Erosion Permit Application _Wetland Permit Application _Grandfather Permit Application —Waiver/Amendment/1 ances ✓Received Application: Received Fee: $ ✓Completed Application Incomplete SEQRA Classification: Type I Type II Unlisted Coordination: (date s nt /CAC Referral Sent: Date of Inspection: Receipt of CAC Repor Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: Public Hearing Held: —Resolution: Name of Applicant Orient Wharf Co. Address 2110 Village Lane, P.O. Box 243, Orient, NY 11957 Phone Number: ( ) Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 024.00-02.00-028.001 Property Location: 2110 Village Lane, Orient, NY 11957 (see annexed survey) (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: J. Kevin McLaughlin, Esq. Ll1 (If applicable) gyp\ Address: P. Box 1210, Southold, NY 11971 y \ �� Phone: 765-6085 FAX#: 765-1856 1 card of Trustees Applicatio GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) : (see annexed survey) Area Zoning: Previous use of property: wharf, docks & yacht club building Intended use of property: same, with addition of existing 6' x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment. Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Date Southold Town Trustees (Wetlands 4/23/87 Permit #482) No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? X No Yes If yes , provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : existing 61 x 81 shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain on the wharf as long as the filtration system is required to obtain a safe water supply. 2 rd of Trustees Applicatiob COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes of proposed activity: to allow the existing 61 x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment to remain as long as necessary m or er o assure a safe water supply. Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No X Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? x No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? N/A (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) None. The existing temporary, portable 6' x 8' shed housing necessary water filtration equipment has been placed on top of the existing wharf, which has been in place for over 100 years. 4 �ard of Trustees APPlicat County of Suffolk State of New York Linton Duell, as President of Orient Wharf Co. DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT BFOR GTHE ABOV DULY E DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT( S) OR REPRESENTATIVES( S) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. .�Q S-igaatu�e� SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS �� ' DAY OF March, 2001. X otar� Public J. KEN' iMcLAUGKIN a I-v, York Qw'ni.d Ii Alb-Fly Lonty My C nmussion Expne rc g 14,:6.112/67)—Text 12 • PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 61;.2T SEC Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART [—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR Orient Wharf (Co. 2. P ]. PROJECT LOCATION: ROJECT NAME Coastal Erosion Permit Munictpalfty, Orient a. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address antl road "'in'sections• prominent landmarks. efc.• or Suffolk Ov 0e map) 2110 Village Lane, Orient, New York SCTM #1000-024.00-02.00-028.001 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: \ . ❑New ❑Expansion Modificatlon/alteration _ 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY' Coastal Erosion Permit to allow existing 6' x s e ousing necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply is obtained. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Inilially Ultimately do!9 d. WILL 90PO$ D AC acres ION COMPL NITH cXI$ ING ZONING OR OTHERGLAVD 2Yes ❑No It No,describe briefly USc ..cam RIC.IGN$? 9_ WHAT lS PRESENT LAND U$E IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Remdentiai ❑.!ncus trial Commercul ❑ `i Agriculture Para/Forest/Ooen soace Oesc:ibe: Mix of residential and marine activities _ other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY 'Fc STATE OR LOCALI? l `JE9AL, Yes U No If yes. !ist agency(s) and permit/atiorovals ap plicant is in the process of obtaining I� all necessary approvals from NYS DEC 11. R•1DOE$ ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT GR APPROVeLo CJ Yes' ❑No If yes, list agencym name and penf/aporoval esi Stlnq Southold Town Trustees Permits 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE .NOOIFICAiION? ❑Yes [�No —�— I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE 'O THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/soonsor name: Orient Wh rfCo. 3//1y/ 01 Dale: Signalur e: 1 If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state acency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this a_s,§essment OVER 'SScaS7d c:lT ,.p 7e Gcr.,Cj.,e- pv -.-C. _ ny 1L .c V E.\CH= � L n .:nCL= :N i fry G-r ���.� —Yes —.No i:i 'i Y O<r0 indtB :tie review �rOces3 anc 'ise :re P:'L_ _> iE. 'NIL-A—— RE� yv _CCRGINA..o REVIE`N AS PoCVIC ma R E] ='R UNL:STET. .^'ION$ IN 3 NYCRR. q4 i:Ser Involvea agency, N0, a.regaCve ❑eC:dr3 I —Yes _No C. COULD AC'.CN PE$UL- :N ANY aGVEiS'c E?-EGS Ct. E.usung au ouali ASSCC:APED 'NMI.. iE FOL-CwING. fAn3wefs .-lay Pe ranew iCen. ,t :egmiel rl. surface of groundwater duality ar Puanhty, .naae levels, existing ;;attic PallemS. solie Palenual for erosion. Pramage or:lodemg ]rOC1e1113? Extilain Jrlefly: xas:e veccc.:cn Pr alsPc IG2 Aesthetic. agncv"Ural, 3lChalOIOgIC31.hl3tonc. Or Omer natural Or cmtural resOUrCes: or community or netghoCm000 cnarac:ef? Explain : v w. egeration or fauna, Ilan. ;neluisn or MiCNe soecles. slgrtlricani haenars. Or :nfeateneo or encangeree scec,as? Exdlaln orlelly, h. A c,,mmumlys existing Plans or goals as 0f"C:aI1v aGGaled,or a change In use or intensity of use of:and or Other natural resources?Ex Ola.n :: I I CZ. StOwin. sYOs...and :evetOOment. Of retalea acaw"es likely :O ae indu,ea dy :tie cracOseO action? Exolaln Onlfly. :S. Long :arm, snort :err. cumuelme. Or Omer ertec:s not icen"fiee rn C.-CS? Eaclaln afleriy. _r. -tner moac:s mC:Jc:ng cnanges m 'ae Of either guantily 0r Wee of energy)? Exdldln Prleny. :. S_�E=.E. --R :5 'i+EaE _:KEL'Y 'C 3E GCNTROVE?Sr RE-ATED TO POTE"GIAL ACVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL.b:PaC-S? —Yes —NO :f Yes. "chin onern, ?AR- III-0Ei'c3MINA711-N OF SIGNIMCANCS I-o 3e completed by agency) INS'RUC-IONS: For each adverse effect identified aCove,determine wnetner it is substantial,large. ;mConant or atnerwise signific cacti effect snouie be assessed in connection w"n its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of acc,"_—Wg; (c) duration irreversibility; (e) geograenic scope; anc (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attacnments Or reference SUPPOrtfng materials. = sure excianallons Contain suffic:ent aetail to snow that all relevant adverse impacts nave been identified and alfeduately aCcressec. — Checx this t0x if Volt have identified one Or �MOre potentially large or Significant aCverse imCaC:S wnic l — OCODr. Then prCCee Girec:ly to Me FULL cAF an Glor prepare a pOSitive•declaratxn. CheGx tnlS pax !f you have determines, based on the information and analysis above and anv sucoortir•.c cocurentaticn. :hat :he OrODOSea action WILL NOT result in,;P�ny significant adverse environmental imcac:= i ONO orcviCe on at:acnments as necessarv, the reasons suDcorting this determina[ion: e.,rne of _v�u +vener nm 7 .ce z.rrne pr <r,Oon,.ore JlliCp n .va :me or t.;oomrore Vnaer ' v\n2:Wc L tHCOMrOre _1:42f n .c�0 �yCnCY i.r(ni:ure Jr /rCp,ltlr If jilte•ent :loin refoctn o" ,".Ce" •IC ^e 1 �^ • 1a-'r4 0B7)-7ext 12 • PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.21 Appendix C SEC State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM p For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT loPp 0R Orient Wharf. Co. T. PROJECTNAME 0. PROJECT LOCATION: Coastal Erosion permit Municipality rie11 nt 4. PREC:SE LOCATION(Street address and road Intersections,prominent landmarksue c..oConty r)profolk Ipa maul 2110 Village Lane, Orient, New York SLIM, #1000-024,00-02,00-028.001 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: J New ❑Expansion ®Modlflcatlorvalterailon 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Coastal Erosion Permit to allow existing 6 r x t S ousin necessary water filtration equipment to remain until a safe water supply is obtained. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: m I411y �I acres Ultimately VaLL PROPOSED AC ION COMPLY WITH � acres cX1$ ING ZONIG EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 2Yes ❑No If No,describe bnefly 9. V/NAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VIOINITY OF PROJECT? RlmtlenlNl ❑JndUatnal — Oesc:IDa: Commercial ❑Agriculture L_j Park/ForesUooen space Mix of residential and marine activities _other 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PEAMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULi 1MAi EL. ROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY Fe STATE OR LOCAU7 v r gyp! (FEDERAL, CJ Yes ❑No If gas. :ist agency(,)and permipapProvals applicant is in the process of obtaining Eall necessary approvals from NYS DEC OES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION NAVE A CURRENTLY vAlJp PERMIT R AppgOV L+ .~ o ❑No If Yea. Ilsi agency name and Permit/apt"Wal es3. ting Muthold Town Trustees Permits RESULT tIOP�F�PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/gppgAl REQUIRE.MODIFICATION? es UN0 I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRZw UE TO THE 9ES OF MY KNOWLEDGE nusoonsor name; OrientDale: 3/I Olre: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state acency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this apessment OVER t A:_ J 1 ` ZS7AEMT .o 7e cz;mcivec Cy Ay^^e.^.c `_ nnE- CLO iN i .v�CF.�. acn i:i.t_7 •t . "es �_Vo JlS. �lnate :na review =rOce33 anc •ssa :ne AC-:CN REC E:VE CCCRCINA,eD AE'/IEW AS pv.CVlCE7= A U!•I L:$T-D.:.^.'iCN$iN o.V YCRR, :+AAT .nlaY oe suoarsaaec or anOtner:nvotveo apenC'/. _ i s 7.i? it NO. a iepat:ve=lCtar: Yes `No i C. COULD AC7iCN RESUL- IN ANY ADVEA$E EFFE.TS ASSCCA7ED WITH iE F.CLLCWIWI. ;,answe m rs ay =e nanawritten. .I :aglcia Cl. Exlatinq au Quality, suiraa or grounawa+er Quality or ouanti omennal for erosion. =ramage Or aOodin c ty. npaa :weld. exrsnnp :;attic Atiema, sods masts orocucacn a, 71Sc 9 7rooiem3n. �olam ]holly. C2 Aesthetic. agricultural. arcnawwglcal,lrstanc, or Omer natural or cultural :esouMSS:Or community or nalgnoomodo c::arn:8,, Eaplain =: v.-.. egelation or .'auna. :Iih, sneltnsn or w,icfife soecles. significant haoltats. or :nreatened or aneanger" soecys? Sxctaln 3nelly: .::. A c=mmunrty's existing plans or;Oils as afflc:atry accOted,or a change in usa or Intensity or use or land or Omer natum nsdumss?Esolam =: •.=. Growth, su Oseauent oeveladment.or lHalaa ac:fwtle3 likely to 7e -noucac ]y the or000see action? Echlin onstiv. -�. -trig :arm, snor. :er.n. =umulatrve,or otner erfers not kenneled in C.-C$? Exalaln 7neny. Clner moats ,inc:�cmg _hanger m J3e or enner Quantity or :Yea or energyl? Ex]um =deny. +. .5_:ER..E :R :S 'i.Eae _:XE_Y -C EE C.^.rl7AOVEAS'r ?ELATED 'O ROTENTI:.L ACVE35E Ea+vIRONME4TAL:ttvaC7$? —Yes —NO :f Yes. sxciam onstly 'ART III-017j'ERMINA71CN OF SIGNIFICANCE (.o be COmpfeted by Agency) 1NS7RUC-ION" For each adverse effect ioentitie0 above,determine whe[ner it is substantial,large.IMCartant or otherwise signific =ach Stlec: should be assessed in connection with its (a) Setting (i.e, urban or rural); (b) probability of Occa.-trig: (c) duration irreversibility:lei geographic scope;and (n magnitude. If necesoue". add attap:srnent3 Of reference supporting materials. E.'isure explanations contain sufficient oetall to snow that ail relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adscuatery accressec. — Ctiecx ;his box ;f 'IOU have identified One Or :Wore potentially large or significant adverse imoac:s whit❑ — occur. Then Orcceed oirec:ly to me FULL EAF anc/or prepare a positive declaration. C1ecx :his box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and anv Sucbortin..- dot men[a[lcn. :hat :he proposed action WILL NOT result in-arty significant adverse environmental imoac:: i AND provice On at[acnments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determina[lon: •m �, .ae �.m! L <.•tQOm,a�e yllWrr .n .ceO : `vrnv :nlr or rt.000m�ow Ultgrr nen.l wre v <HQQM�QIe',h—•n teas wrm<v )gnerwe Jr erraJrer if Aulefrnt nom Jugen T Jl! 7 Albe*J. Krupski, President �o�pSUfFO(,�049 Town Hall John Holzapfel, Vice President y` 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson C* x P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Gaaell O Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenzel y'ffa .a�� Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765- 1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD APPLICATION FOR ICE DAMAGE PERMIT Existing Permit Number Creek. 0(-k h The: purpose of this application: Redriving or replacing openwork dock or openwork pier piling, and mooring piles, removal of damaged piling, repair, resetting or replacement of floaring docks, ramps, or decking, all necessitated by ice and sr.c•rm damage resulting during �Oal/ Oa3 Winter. Please complete form below and return to the Trustees Office along with a copy of your original permit and drawing. Provided that all paper work is in order, you will receive approval within a week if not immediately. _cant' s Name & Address L /)Jf T I&MAfiC t�V - Aq, 1 /1�/� y)/ Tel.No. ;:tractor' s Name & Address-4 /J e Tel.No. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. No dredging or filling is permitted. 2 . Repairs to existing structures are limited to replacement of timbers without change in design or dimension. 3 . No repair or replacement of bulkheads is permitted under this permit. 4. No freshwater or tidal wetlands are to be disturbed under any circumstances. 5 . A yellow permit sign provided by this office shall be displayed on the project at all times while under replacement. OVER 6. Original permit numbers (3" high) must be displayed on project, if not already displayed. 7. Groins and bulkheads are .,54bject to inspection prior to issuance of permit. % I..k 8 . This office must be notified upon completion of work. No* q" Arwa LASkAlk AM SOUTH' OLD TRUSTEES Issued T%#AE Wlc" Co. Date- 41410.3 Address h+Qh} - admA NAAe r' THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE,TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1892 —� -_ �• VOLK�� Gym k1 53095 Mal^ Road f- - TownP.O. Box 1179 to Southold, New Yock 11971 -Vt LI PlinNr V5161�65.V8U1 SOUTHOLD TORN COUNCIL CONSERVATION ADVISORY To: Southold Town Trustees From: CAC ular April 19, 1988 CAC at their Ye9 Dated: were made by the The following recommendations 1988: April 14, Ltd. - Table meeting held Thursday, of America, ,j'C,TT6Z Asso ates by Neted No 614 _ oyster r Farm until receipt of additional Information. royal. Carole Kiernan - Recommend approval -No 615 _ Bernard and royal. John C. Vassil - Recommend approval, Tanski —No. 616 Sohn Holzapfel is to contact jay se the wanson advise. Mr, Holzapfel well Trustees' adlo 617 _ Janet S at the at Sea Grant for ad recommendation TRustees of the CAC meeting- end approval• ) Wilhelm Franken - Recomm ulation No, 618 _ Recommend approval with the stw laced in kind, in place or landward. moo, 619 - Daniel Stegner that bulkhead is P - Recommend approval. - 1 _ Roger and Dorothy Lamour royal e _No, 620 Inc. - Recommend aPP w Park Associates, sloe be maintained and 1 No. 621 - Cedar Beach that the bank work during dredging• tl with the stipulation that the Bay Constable check the Tr Is waiver requests: apl Recommendations on waiver request to royal of Kiefer - Recommend approval request Joh. royal of waiver Spetsiotes - Recommend aPP True end denial of waiver request toe Recommend -� Pearlman � meeting• Stalk - Will advise at Trustees Ilene TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF SOUTHOLD TOIVN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No. E4............ has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No. 594 filed by Applicant .Orient Wharf„QQMP'gAy .••••••................................. on .....11/16/87......... 19.......... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Permit granted to do the following work ......T.°.,extend a float arrangement„50',,,12y �ddj 0.g..1 wo 6' x 20' floats with 5-5' x 20' "T" floats and„1 '..: d7xd to dd.d 8 pilings. . .............. Location of property on which work to be done .....Orient Harbor,. Main..& King.............. Street, Orient. ............................................................................................................................ . .......................................................................................................................... Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property Orient Harbor . ................................................................................................. .................................................................................................... Size of work: Length ....2...:,N'- floats with 5 Width 2 - 6' floats with 5- . 5' "T" and 1 - 4' "T" : ............................................................................................................... Height Above High Water ----------- , ............................................................................................. ----------- Depth Below Low Water ................................................................................................. Yards to be Excavated ..............n�a . . ................................................................................ Yards to be Filled ... n/a ...................................................................................................... Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited n/a ............................................................................................................ Intended use of property Industrial P P Y ......................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................... Conditions if an ------ ................................................................................................... Expiration Date .,Txo Years from the date thg•,8,� m1..i ••�jgnRd if work has not 'commenced by iai4 date. Number of Inspections Required ,..:..trustees are completion of the work. • • • .....1:Q. be„rloki. jed Inspection Fees .....$10.00 . .......................................................................................... Liability Policies in the Amount of .....: ;;-;;; ;-;;;;-- . ......................................... The validity of this Permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental or municipal authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other approval when required shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon receipt by the Trustees. of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or disapproval. The applicant does by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations under- taken pursuant to this permit, and shall take all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the applicant also agrees to indemni- fy and save harmless the Town, and its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims arising from operations under this permit and any and all acts or omissions of applicant, his agent and employees. The applicant and the owner and occupants of the premises upon which the operations authorized by this permit are being conducted, do, by the acceptance of this permit, give consent to the Town, and its officers and employees to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conouciea to make such inspections as the Town may deem necessary to insure that such operations are being con- ducted in conformity with this permit. This operation will not substantially: A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the town. B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. C. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vege- tation or the natural habitat thereof. E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. F. Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity. I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. o /F� Signed ✓ E1.:.. �9'„ .&4 A President Board of Southold Town Trustees . _ c �/ ........... Date......,./..�.� `��.... .ly...�. ..:5.. ... SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES NO.�� ■ Issued To�'� � en¢ "k Date Address z 4 7rnza�z NW • THIS NOTICE MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE.TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TEL.: 765-1801 s FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o tt ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President rn k.� T TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III �0� (516) 765.1892 JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 26, 1988 Mr. John H. Geideman P. O. Box 416 East Marion, New York 11939 Re: Orient Wharf Company - Application No 594 Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on May 25, 1988 regarding the above matter. WHEREAS, John H. Geideman on behalf of the Orient Wharf Co. applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated November 16, 1988, and WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on May 25, 1988 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that John H. Geideman on behalf of the Orient Wharf Company BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: extend a float arrangement 50' by adding two 6' x 20' floats with 5 - 5' x 20' "T" floats and 1 - 5' x 4' "T" and 8 pilings. Property is located on Orient Harbor, Main & King Street, Orient. John H. Geideman on behalf of the Orient Wharf Company - Page 2. This permit will expire two years from the date it is signed if work has not commenced by said date. There are two inspections required and the Trustees are to be notified upon the completion of the work. Prior to the issuance of said permit by the Clerk, the applicant shall file with the Clerk a certificate that he has public liability insurance policies insuring against any liability which may arise in the performance of the operations pursuant to such permit in such amount as shall be fixed by the Trustees, which said policies shall name the Town as a name insured. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Please return to the Building Dept. for a determination on the need of any other permits that may be required for this project. Kindly remit $10.00 for inspection fees due. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept. Planning Board Board of Appeals Floyd King, Jr. file BOARD OF TORN 'TRUSTEES TOWN OP SOGTI[OLD p� _ t 53095 main Road Phone 765-1892 !Wa '� J-(� Southold. N. Y. 11971 r { Date GC 19�/� RECEIVED OE LPL iII a _Dollars 3 Fore/�i ' a q BOARD OF TORN 'TRUSTEES � Cash Check �/ i dOTICE OF HEARING I • . ON THE WETLAND APPLICATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIV- COUNTY OF SUFFOLK EN THAT PUBLIC HEAR- STATE OF NEW YORK ss: INGS WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN I Patricia Wood, being duly sworn, says that she is the HALL, MAIN ROAD,SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK, Editor, of THE LONG ISLAND TRAVELER-WATCHMAN, ON WEDNESDaY, MAY 25, a public newspaper printed at Southold, in Suffolk County; 1988, ON THE FOLLOWING I and that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, APPLICATIONS FOR PER- I 8 MITS UNDER THE PROVI- has been published in said Lon Island Traveler-Watchman � SIONS OF THE WETLAND once each week for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . weeks ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN. 7:30P.M:'Ib resume the hear- successivelv, Commencing onthe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ing in the matter of the applica- tion of J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Russell Planitzer as d ' ' ' ' 7 19 w amended 10 construct a 10' X . l 10' Gazebo with three benches and an earthen walking trail. ' • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Property is located on Wilderness Point, Fishers Island. , 7:32 P.M.-To resume the hew- ing in the matter of the applica- Sworn to before me this . . . . . ./�. . . . . . . . . . . . day of tion of Latham Sand&Gravel, ��y, Inc. on behalf of Robert Z e p Hulsman to construct a 135' • • . . . • . • • . . . . • • . . . . . . , 19 . . . . . timber bulkhead and to backfill to be brought in from an upland source. Property is located on Willow Terrace, Orient. , 7:34. P.M: In the matter of 'ice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .?^. . .c. the application of Joyce and � � . . . . . • • • . . • . . Joseph Zevits as amended to Notary Public construct a 8' X 4' stationary walkway, 4' X 10' ramp with a BARBARA FORBES 4'X 15'Float secured by two pil- Notary PubBe, State of New York ings. Property is located on Lit- No. 4806846 tle Peconic Bay Lane,Southold. Qualified in Suffolk Count 7:36 P.M:In the matter of the COmmtesion I�Pirea eL1.7.3 y19 F.P application of Costello Marine Contracting on behalf of John C. Vassil to replace 200 lin. ft. of bulkhead, in kind/in place, ramp 2-'/z A tv, to a float 6' and to(ill with approx.20-30 cu. X 20' to be secured by two pil- yds.of Fill to be trucked in from ings. Property is located at 1690 an upland source. Property is North Bayview Road,Southold. located on Salt Lake Lane, ALL PERSONS IN- Mattituck. TERESTED IN SAID MAT 7:38 P.M:In the matter of the TERS SHOULD APPEAR AT application of Garrett A.Strang THE TIME AND PLACE' on behalf of Bernard&Carole ABOVE SPECIFIED AND Kiernan to construct a 30'X 4' WILL BE GIVEN AN OP- catwalk,5'X 4'-_amp,two 16'X PORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. 4' Floats and one 40' X 4' "T" COMMENTS MAY BE SUB- shaped Float to be secured by MITTED IN WRITING pilings. Property is located on PRIOR TO THE DATE OF North Parish Drive, Southold. THE HEARING. 7:40 P.M:In the matter of the Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. application of J.H. Geideman President on behalf of Floyd King(Orient Board of Town Trustees Wharf Co.)to extend a Float ar- Dated: April 29, 1988 rangement 50' into the water. IT-5/12/88(72) Property is located on Main & King Street, Orient. 7:42 PM:In the matter of the application of Roger W. & Dorothy Lamour to construct a Orient. 7:34 P.M. -• In she matter of NOTICE OF HEARING _ the application of Joyce and / 1 ��C// ON THE WETLAND JOfeph Zevits as amended to con- l f p, APPLICATIONS umct a 8'x 4'stationary walkway, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN 4 x 10'ramp with a 4-x 15'float ITIAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL "sewed by two pilings. Property is STATE OF NEW YORK ) BE HELD BY THE TOWN located on Little Peconic Bay TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF Lane. Southold. ) SS: SOUTHOLD,ATTHESOUTHOLD 7:36 P.M. -• In the matter of COUNTY OFSUFFOLK ) TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, the application of Costello Marine SOU THOLD, NEW PORK, ON Contracting art behalf of John C. WEDNESDAY.MAY 25,1988,ON Vassil to replace 200 En. ft. of Christina COntento THE FOLLOWINGAPPIICATf FORPERMI7S UNDER THE PRO- fill with approx. 20-30 cu. yds. of Said County, being duly sworn, Says that he/she is VISIONS OF THE WETLAND OR- fill 10 be trucked in from an upland Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES, a Weekly DINANCEOF THE TOWN, source. Property is located on Salt 7:30 P.M. -- To resume the Lake Lane, Mattimck. Newspaper, published at Greenport, in the Town hearing in the matte of the appE- of :38 P.M. -- In the ,natter of of Southold, County Of Suffolk and State of New cation J.M.O.. Consulting on the application of Garrets A. behalf of Russell Planitxer as Strang on behalf of Bernard &Ca- York, and that the Notice of which the annexed is amended to construct a 10' x 10' role Kiernan to construct a 30'x 4' a printed c0 Gazebo with three benches and an catwalk, Y x 4' ramp, two 16'x 4' PY. has been regularly published in earthen walking trail. property is float; and one 40' x 4'.-7"shaped said Newspaper once each week for located on Wilderness Point, Fish- float to be secured by pilings. weeks Successively, commencing on the 12 en Island. _ Property is located on North 732 P.M. -- To resume the Parish Drive, Southold - day of hearing in the matter of the appli- 7:40 P.M. --In the master of the y--- 19 8 8- cation of Latham Sand & Gravel, APplrcatim of J.H. Geideman on Inc. m behalf of Robert Hulsman behalf of Floyd King (Orient head and to a I35' timber bulk- Wharf Co.) 0' extend a float herd and b GckfiB ro be brought amngemem 50' into the water. - ,from an u land zoo:tt p n Property is located m Main & "/ is looted on Will. Terrrsee, King Street, Orient. - Principal Clerk 7:42 P.M. -- In the matter of the application of Roger W, & Sworn to r Dorothy Lamour to construct a a this ramp 2-1/1' x IU' ro a Doas 6' z day of 99XX YY IAARY K. DEGNAN 20' 1 NOTARY P09LIC,State of New York Pro a be secured by two pilings. Sutfolk County No.4849860�j,h Property is located a Southold, North Tenn Expues FebruarvJlitt rCJ rt BsALLRoad, INTER ��-� ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN SAID MATTERS SHOULD APPEAR AT THE 7IME AND PLACE ABOVE SPECIFIED AND WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD. COMMENTS•MAY BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING PRIOR 70 THE HEARING. DATED:April 29, 1988 Frank A. Kujawski, Jr., Pres. Board of Town Trustees 5946-ITMy 12 9� y7So /so wllATi" z /Ps 017 JY� uo��c C. JvcK ` a. h•.i, 29 I , _ 33' Z I - ----- 33) 29' 7S I I 26F' 3.2' 13 ZZ 26' - _nc %9 /C b 1 /3 /4 I i Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. HENRY P. SMITH, = JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III � TELEPHONE John B6dnoski, Jr. t'C (516) 765-1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT DATE: April 21, 1988 APPLICATION NO. :594 NAME: J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient.Wharf Company) This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To extend a float arrangement 50' into the water. LOCATION: Main Street & King Street, Orient REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An environmental assessment form has been submitted which indicated that there would be no adverse effect to the environment should the project be implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the New York State D.E.C. it is assumed that there are no objections nor comments from those agencies. * The concerns of the D.E.C. were addressed during a work session of the Board of Trustees. INSPECTION CHECK OFF SHEET In accordance with Chapter 97, Article II, Section 97-28 the Trustees may adopt a resolution directing the issuance of a permit to perform operations applied for only if it determines that such operations will not substantially: Adversely affect the wetlands of the Town. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial mar organisams, aquatic wildlife and vegetation or the natur habitat thereof. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the Tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands i the vicinity. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. FLOOD PLAIN REVIEW: CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNppCIL COMMENTS: REVIEW OF ASSESSMENT FORM: IP "m"�" �7✓`�0 ��9. Jfi�Sd FFL Q C�E I - i i /a o' O, Y, C Z9 j; 2.f 27 I --- ---— --- 33� ZG 7S I—ZE 3.2, 13 22 z6' ,74 .26 � 4 � � B Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. HENRY P. SMITH, ~ JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III TELEPHONE John Be,dnoski, Jr. • (516) 765.1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT DATE: April 21, 1988 APPLICATION NO. :594 NAME: J. 11. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient.Wharf Company) This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617. 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To extend a float arrangement 50' into the water. LOCATION: Main Street & King Street, Orient REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION• 1. An environmental assessment form has been submitted which indicated that there would be no adverse effect to the environment should the project be implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the New York State D.E.C. it is assumed that there are no objections nor comments from those agencies. * The concerns of the D.E.C. were addressed during a work session of the Board of Trustees. Board,ol� Trustees • • Page 2. For further information regarding this application please contact: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , President Board of Town Trustees Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 or call: (516) 765-1892 cc: Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept. Planning Board Board of Appeals Town Clerk's Bulletin Board file a, CAIFB DYER TO ORIENT VJ'ARF CC. Know all Men by these presents that I Caleb Dyer of Orient in the Town of Southold, County of Suffolk and State o£ New `fork for and in consideration of the sum of Five hundred dollars to me in hand paid by Thomas V. 'Tuthill. Peter W. Tuthill, Thomas V. Young, John B. Young and Wm. S. Hobart, Directors of the Orient Wharf Company at and before tie ensealing and delivering of these presents the receipt whereof I do hereby acknowledge, have Pranted, bargained and sold and by these presents do grant, bargain and Sell unto the said Thomas V. Tuthill, Peter W. Tuthill, Thomas V. Young, John B. Young & Wm. Hobart, direct- ors of the Orient Wharf Company and to their successors in office, A certain Wharf now located in Orient and extending into the Harbour three hundred feet or there- abouts, Together with all the rights and privileges granted to Said Caleb Deer 3: others by an act of the Legislature of the State of New York, passed Entitled an act as may may now fully appear by reference to the same. To Have and To Hold all and singular the aforesaid Wharf and appurtenances unto the said Trustees of the Orient Wharf Company and to their successors in office forever 2nd I tre said Caleb Dyer do for myself, my heirs and executers and administrators the Said granted Wharf and appurtenances unto the Trustees of Orient Wharf Coc:pany and to their successors in office against me the said Caleb Dyer, my Executo_;, l,ei.r:: s,nd Administrators and against all anc every other person and persons whosoEver 3Lsli and will Warrant and forever defend. In witness whereof I the slid Caleb Dyer have hereunto Set my hand and Seal this Thirtienth day of January Gne thousand =i.. ht hundred and forty Eight. " In presence of Caleb Dyer L.S. Geo. Champlin Warren G. Case State of New York Suffolk County On this 6th day of August in the year one thousand F:iht hundred and fifty one before me personally carve Warren G. Case subscribing witness to the within conveyance to me known who being by me duly sworn did depose and say that he resides in the Town of Southold in said County Lhat he knew Caleb Dyer the individual described in and who executedthe said con- veyance and that he was present and sa* the said Caleb Dyer Sign and Seal the same as and for his. act and deed iwf�ercupon the -laid Darren G. Case became the subscribing witness thereto. Francis I.. ':ou.r:g Justice of the Peace ,in and for said County Recorded On the 8th day of December 1851 at 1:00 O'clock P.10. B. T. Hutchinson, Clerk THOMAS V. YOUNG k OTHERS TO ORIENT WHARF CO. Know All Men by these Presents That we Thomas V,youn_ Benjamin amu M. Youn¢, Sel W. Youn¢, William J. Y +nv, Qil_ la youn¢. Cynthia A. Champlin and John G. Champlin, the parties named in a certain instrument executed in persuance of a Resolution of the Commission- of the land office by the Honorable Hamilton Fish Governor of the State of New York at the City of Albany, the fourth day of March in the year One Thousand eight hundred and fifty and recorded in Book of Patents No=_ 31L_Pagj _149 .by A. G. Johnsen Deputy Secretary of State, partfes of the first part in con- sideration of one dollar lawful money of the United States to us in hand paid by Edwin P. Brown, Thomas V. Yogg and Isaac S. Edwards Directors of Orient Wharf Com under an not of incorporation passed by the Legislature of the n e o New York on the twenty eight of June, Eighteen Hundred and Fifty one of the second part at or before the ensealing and delivering of these presents the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have bargained, granted, sold, assigned, transferred and set over and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, assign, tra afer and set over unto the said parties of the Second Part the above described denture of Grant with all the rights, tittles and privileges there- un to belonging or pertaining of the Second p it To successors and To Hold the same unto the said parties part and their suoceesore in office forever. In Witness Whereof we have hereunto set our hands and Seal the fifth day of January in the year One Thousand eight hundred and Sixty. Thomas V. Young L.S. William J. Young L.S. In presence of Barzilla Young L.S. Benjamin M. Young Absalom King Cynthia Champlin L.S. John G. Champlin L.S. Samuel W. Young L.S. State of New York Suffolk County On the 12th day of January in the year One Thousand Eight hundred and Sixty, before me personally came Absalon King with whom I am personally acquainted and being by me duly sworn deposes and says that he is a resident of the town of Southold in the County of Suffolk. That he saw Thomas V. Young, Barzilla Young, Cynthia A. Champlin, Samuel W. Young, William J. Young, Benjamin A. Young and John G. Champlin execute the within conveyance, that he the said Absalom King subscribed his name thereto as a Witness and that he knew the said Thomas V. Young, Barzille Young, Cynthia Champlin, Samuel W. Young, William J. Young. Benjamin M. Young and John G. Champlin to be the persons described in and who ex- ecuted the said conveyance. Henry H. Terry Justice of the Peace in Said County Recorded On the 18th day of February 1863 at it oclook P.M. John Wood - Clerk • • 140 Copy of the underground Grant of the Orient Dock Co. THE PEOPLE of the State of New York, by the Grace of God. Free and Independent: To all to whom these presents shall come, Greeting: Know Ye, that, pursuant to a resolution of the Com- missioners of our Land Office, for the purpose of promoting the Commerce of our said State, and for no other object or purpose whatsoever, and with the reservations and upon the conditions hereinafter mentioned, WE have given, and by these presents, do give unto Thomas V. Young, Benjamin ".1. Young, Samuel 1.7. Young, Barzilla Young, Cynthia A. Champlin and John G. Champlin 4 William J. Young, the power and the authority to erect any Dock or Docks that shall be necessary to promote the Commerce of our said State, upon the land under water hereinafter described, and the authority to collect from persons using such Dock or Docks, reasonable and accustomed dockage, to be regulated by our Legis- lature, to wit: All that certain piece or parcel of land under water situate in the Town of Southold and Count, of Suffolk adjacent to lands owned by them on the shore and bounded as follows, via: Beginning at the foot of the highway leading from the main road to Orient Harbor and running south seventy nine degrees west .five hundred feet; thence south eleven degrees east thirty five feet; thence north seventy nine degrees east five hundred feet; thence north eleven degrees west thirty five feet to the place of beginning. Excepting and reserving to all and every the said People, the full and free right, liberty and privilege of entering upon and using all and every part of the above described premises, in as ample a manner as they might have done had this cower and authority not been given, until the same shall have been actually appropriated and applied to the purposes of Commerce, by erecting a Dock ox• Locks thereon: And these presents are upon the Express Condition that if the said, Thomas V. Young, Benjamin L".. Young, Samuel W, young, Barzilla Young, Cynthia A. Champlin and John G. Champlin assigns shall not within three years from the date hereof actually appropriate and apply the above described premises to the purposes of Commerce, by erecting a Dock or Docks thereon and filling in the same, then these presents and every thing herein contained shall cease, determine and become void, In Testimony Whereof, we have caused these our letters to be made patent, and the Great Seal of our said State to be hereunto affixed: WITNESS Hamilton Fish, Governor of our State, at our city of Albany, the fourth day of March in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty. Passed. the Secretary's Office the Q day of March 1850 A. G. Johnson, Dep. Sec. of State Hamilton Fish Examined and compared with the original. A.G. Johnson, Lep. sec. State, _ New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 (516) 751-7900 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner February 4, 1988 Mr. Henry P. Smith, President Town of Southold Board of Trustees Town Hall P.O. Box 728 53095 Main Rd. Southold, NY 11971 Re: SEQR Coordination Letter of 12/ 18/87, Town Application No. 594 DEC Nos. 10-86-1787 & 10-88-0130 Dear Mr. Smith: With regard to the above action, the enclosed shall serve to inform you of our history and position: 3/2/87 - 10-86-1787 permit issued (see conditions and approved plan) . 11/25/87 - request to modify (see modified plan 10-88-0130 & 12/ 17/87 letter) . 1/28/88 - new application ( 10-88-0130) received. The December 17, 1987 letter and copy of letter to J.H. Geideman of Feb. 4 will outline Department staff's position and status of our review. In short, we oppose it both as a modification and new application. May I have your input as to the Town's stance as Lead Agency? If it is your intention to deny, please inform me as soon as possible. Finally, the enclosed Law (Chapter 307) was provided by agent for apDlicant to demonstrate ownership. My opinion is stated on it. Very truly yours, �� Joseph B. Hall Environmental Analyst JBH:jf enc. 10-86-1787 & plan (4 pg. ) 12/ 17/87 letter 0 pg. ) 10-88-0130 mod. plan 0 pg. ) Chap. 307 ( 1 pg. ) 2/4 ltr. to Geideman cc: R. Greene w/enc. A. Kellar w/enc. C. Hamilton/G. Stadnik/C. deQuillfeldt w/ I copy ref. all w/enc. file w/enc. i i New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 Am (516) 751-1389 oboe Thomas C. Jorling February 4 , 1988 Commissioner Mr. John H. Geideman P.O. Box 416 East Marion, NY 11939 Re : Orient Wharf Co. UPA No. 10-88-0130 Dear Mr . Geideman: This will serve to update the status of the above action and provide the Department's position. As you will recall when the original permit was issued ( 10-86-1787) , it specifically restricted the number of boats to be docked here to 10. If more space was wanted, why wasn't it requested originally? Also, as the permit cover letter states, if any chance of non-compliance was anticipated we should have been conta, t:ed upon receipt . As I mentioned in my December 17 , 1987 letter the modification request was contrary to the original permit conditions and required new application. The Department is of the same opinion regarding the impacts to waters and wetlands as outlined in that letter. It is also viewed as a segmented action of unacceptable cumulative impact and contrary to the intent o the State EnvironmeHtal Quality Review Act (SEQR) . Next, I have been advised by SEQR coordination that Southold Town has tabled your application pending proof of ownership to lands underwater (not control of "lying of vessels" within 100' of wharf as it existed in 1851) . Since Southold is Lead Agency in this Lction, time frames on decisions are suspended until the Lead Agency has ( 1 ) issued a negative declaration of significance or (2) accepted an environmental impact statement .Section 70-0109 .5 of Environmental Conservation Law [ECL]) . I shall keep you informed of any new developments as they occur. Very truly yours , ✓Joseph B. Ha11 Environmental Analyst JBH:jf cc : Orient Wharf Co. (attn: Floyd King) R. Greene A. Kellar G. Stadnik C. deQuillfeldt H. Smith - Southold Tn. Trustees file ;Jew Yc ,K State Departmen, ( Env_ironmental-_Gonservation --- _- -� - 6eculatory lffairs Unit - ---- "�C 40, .SOY fQL. L:G 5tony�Lrook 1;Y 11754 .��Commiiuoner..-r..-d.- �L . 11S'D7 ?.Ltn: Pir. Floyd 1:ing, Treasurer ae : Per-mit 1; 10-86-1787 r c Unifcrn Procedures Act (Article i, Confonmance with the regvremi2ni.s o� the -mac�e 72: ECL) and its implementing regulations (ErYCRP., Fart 621) %,,e are enclosing your �Ernit. Please read all conditions carefully. I; you are enable to comply with zn_v Cenci - Ons , please ccntact us at the above address. also Enclosed is a permit si Cn which is to to consolcucusl_y posted at the pro �ECt site end FrotEC-Ed frcm the weather. Veeerry truly yours , FL�red i. Leput; Pecicral P'=_rm:it r.c-.icstratcr ics:re OI P 1 Us t tH ICI Ali CC_ eL1111 vtrH iE R._ o o T E%PIRAnO, DAT EIsI 10-56-1767 PERMIT f+C•LIIN PROCR km NUMM&a Under the Environmental Conservation Llw 2/2S/S 9 N/A Article 25: �l 6t:YCRP. 606. TItla1 "1e11antls A.rtic'e t5, Tu E 3. 6C)'CF,R 27• J V;aler Ouallty Certlllcauon Article 27 Title 7: 6NYCRF. 3c•G. 328. C'_9 Aauz'dc Pesbiroes Article 17. TISIes 7. 8: Solid K'aste I!anape meat• C.rucle 15. Tr1e S°DES �'. c';Yr-- Aflrle u . TI'. t -- q F;`:Cc;Ion 01 •.o. - — Ar PGl.a;lcn CGn;rG. Articic 23 111!e 27: •._� 1:.,:`�a�E'n` tl F.eclz 'e'I�n Coastal DOslD ArusE .6. T'. . tLlned Article S6: )''•LIP[ IiLil_✓_ 4 "4 � „rt;cle 2 FIOOc;IIa r h'=- . Art;: _ 15...'I , . -rCoev": ,.u;.l (•G'I:)„11, Aroaes. 2:_. LD. s IodiIIC:115r1 Z113.) P-Fe n 0—LiCIE l'GG!fI all:lal Rivers r„F.•eIT ISxaD to Orient Thar` Co. 1 ;.:,aF.L55 01 PIR1dI11tE it-CI-HONE NUMB"Kin. St. , Orient 1:Y 11957 ACENT FOR I'ER A TTEbCONIACT PERSON s 1�1 11939 J.H. Geideman. Bo:� 416 East P:arion NAME ADD ADDRESS OF PROIECTIFACILITY(If dalerent Lem Permitted SCTP1 1000-01 r_028.001 UTM COORDINATES Orient Harbor at foot of KiOU Scree= I Tost N'L?lY�SWx COUNTY I LOCSTION OF PROIECT,FAGIJTY Suffolk Southold ! Orient �,11 work A ACTIVITY d fineer viers flDatsl . DESCRIPTION OF AUTMORI ZED C I P.enlace Cable moorine s%-stem with ilex ramp an shall be in accordance �-ith T\iSDEC annroved plans (attached. GENERAL CONDITIONS rmillee agrees that the permit is f edh herein upon strict hereto. i(ied herein or attached hereto. fay acceptance or this permit, the eg z nct,ceof rnten;,ontocemmence ante with the ECL,all applicable regu lalions and the conditions spec -j•ng o1 the complxLon of Ire Fork. 1 The perm rtae shall l.Ie m the cfi.ce of the app,oy ate re E'ona'Pe,mn a_m1, 11 at o or ether cr,�ce designated m;he sveoal con moos. ;he s.od at lean z _ e<en[zu•e of:he Gepartment d Em+ronmxn:al Consen'at-on..h�ch.Tax order the mac^s:.sy'"-d'I E hour in advance oI the ante of commencement xnd shall also notthe D partm'r :am?: I. for all damages.direct or in ofwhatesernaturexnd Sr whomever The permitted w'crk shall be subsea;an°5po ECL,,.0301 and S.APrAp6-DI(31 name xn'_descn� the public mterest so regwres pu,s.. the full IeEal responsibi i'1 es and cos-3 of es•er1' 3 The permrttee has accepted expressly,by the esecouon of the ap Pbcauon. sufits I arising out c:me project da,trrised herein and has agreed to rndemnl'1'xn"sxve harmless[he State srom wits.actions.damages end or revoke this permit x'. am•time after due nonce. and. if requested. hold a hearing when. Lon resulting from :he said protect. The Department h seises the rghl to ededor misd , suspend a1 the stove of 2`"".,v[e!ned bse�m misrepresentation or e%oe eocdsddo en ol r ele see tpermit or. or provision, of the ECL and pertment regulations are loum. ect is '� slcal changes z e disco,e,ed since the perm¢was issued. bl perm r inc lud zn.forms,ices w supplemec:al in!o:oz;ion wh,lch vas'Se recwred q newly d,scovered miormztion or significant p 1 - I capon. ermnsi poor to the expsrzoe- date. ex rs asT'sble for Le=.Togthe.^'r^',�:zr:r.e br'ub` --rz'.eval z.p' .1'y to .�•.anagement p inerce:lc periom the i .he perru:: r to the Permit. br;he Depz,tmen;,no la:ar :hen 30 dzYs 11E0 days (o, $PGE$ or Sold or Htza rduou5 held or vested In z Person no;a pant of title or mterest rn real or personal p,operl' a Tr s Permit shall not be cons:med as tom ec^g to:ire appGca nt ant'ngh[to C.spass upon the hods or mlerer lilt or ec bea,requ lied tior this prrolee[ perm.lted work or zs a,IIhonvng:he Impairment of zn1 nE^°• orals lands. easements and , ,ghtstrIzt ;ire Commissioner The per os�oed tor.mod,iy,supersede or resund an orde,on co nsect or deterr,,naLon b', T mrwe is responsible +o" artm 'n6 z^s no'.a perm x Eppr ad n such order or determination. E Issuance of Ihs perms bl the Deia r[me',t does non.unless econditi ns issued heretofore by:he Deparment or ane of :hc terms. conditions n writing andrattached hereto. y c•, moL'i'.ation of this permit E'amer_b,the Deoxr[mem must be m 8 ADGFE55 T 1 7 G • I PER+JT AD>tl Nl$TnAT C.'• 019 S=OC"r --0'C`T' PERVIT ISSU".SCE DATE Bldg 's0 =t'=� c.... 3/2/S7 Alfred T. Kellar f� pa_tt "I of .I iLTHOR:ZED SIC'.•.:LRE / . "1 risk-GtwfA0kIt -- +c+ lOr.. rrvurre�n a- � xier•:ironme 1^t<(Kr(�v F'a1-eyTa'ri�ST �'T�' ' J„ Trial 11 IOWre (p .tic,m b} the )tale O firth^ �'"¢•J y- $`� ----rtrE+vA4LtACS16L']SSIIQtrtYgL' fLNa�lrowa2�a+' __ - - - ---• -- -'r. r."t.o�:<_i.ns aruu_creC:e_>'-mac prosen.^soo¢•thexvrY.lx'-lettrmittd_ _ r wltlsull k+ ws lei re'f lrse D'� rdpes auwa-:- __ cause unreasonable obstruction w the bee n+ngaoon of said -__:stuU be renseve'd e.•e+s Y. r g ..a1m or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or »ellare of -. _ tF,, bed of a waterway or llv dplarn or deep hotel tha! mJy have a she people of the State. or cause loss or destrvclron Of t}w natural tenorncy to cause damage to navrsable channels or-ic�+ banks ors__ -- --lesources of the State,the owner may be ordered br the Depar ment to a waterway.- - -- - - - _ - - - '-M'- ---- -nJnrra 0 aFwe mlM(+rrCr:.7lh na Gal_n`-M'1Eew qr_.__ remes'e or alter-tce_wctural or� p=struaiony-o[he:arO• c5-„>i-0_ ------urerebv .,rthpvt eanense to the Stale. and if canon the es nrrabon or- --- here:,-tutto•ded--- - re,,CJl,on 01 1, permit the StruCurf. lia, eica,atrpn. or 01'd'r lb II upnr.Ihr n(.ra hC.n(r in,oc a Iron C It Crmrt the : .reCt I'ren:', mcd.lr;awn w -nr.,ai,ri:o.,eh.le"'. av11-r0117ee +1-111 nn' re <om" aurtrprrled h?'no: t+»•nrnmprerrd rr.-aP:Jr(ar sLa'I ., r_u:e*Dime IC ",r SG,Ic ao� s�c'� w 0.c St.,, r.d I,r , r,1. c•�er.: .,r.,, a s.rcl. r.nrr an(; r annrr a• vrc I..tr: Ing o.,hers •rl rrn.n.r, rrU u.r. .-nnr,r r:.l.• i 0. ,r..nf•'d' rr.:.' ^n _ r:cnner r'Irr..�)r L-rin.-rq nl r.,rr.r'urn:pl a F)f:r2••",•'r':' t rn rr nrr.r•c.(r••.•• rr ro-r i I : .r . .a. . ...r C' r0- Jm .. i..:, nrn. r".nd .. r. r U- r !: r. 1 , -. r - r in,r . ry p L' id anur^s O: au• :,rn,I (t.�ci rrGl nuc,c In( a;'. :,r: CI In[ r.y r.c.n.r. Ivu _ �-� 1"_.r . . cJ:',u,;r_[• ri,1rC. r Urir:\ OI O.�i1Crr- g an\ e:lw, pt•nn L"iDn, con, w or apprp,nl Irom M:acp,llres CJI!lerded t, Ihip plart'rn muq hi' in cln:' iCnlOnirdn R' trr(' L S ,rm. Corr- of EnFrneers C C Co,,,: Guard ne„ )06. Sale ,, ." .. JGp'.-.rd rn. ._. .::IcC o. :ht.8pr'6 rq 0. n-2:('nl a, p.•ri C,C(-or Genf:J it-r.ice,or IOa,I go.,fnment„hrC r ma\ ce recurred o: Ir- : amr: r. plrc^:.nn t?. :,I' n,cesszr\' C'4crul'On, shall be tl::en to precwno- con:a-,.na;:on It ei an\ „ea ar.d or .,alcrna\ by su,Penoed sol-os sedrmcnts. fuels. sokents. IvbnCacls. ono,v coatings. paints.concrete Icachale or an; err, SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1 . There shall be no dredging associated with this pro! , ct. 3. ::o -:re than 10 boats May be docked at this facility. Supplementary Special Ccnditions (A) throt:_h (J) attached. I I I I i I I I I I I I I DcC °E R':li �'J r•'°cd I 10-5E-1;57 i i LJ 4' r _D p �— Gott MAINToo Pd II PIATrf- r"/� I d I fe a INNARF Co.Ck>CK 14 r_M dC'IFNT HAkEoQ �-�G; ; NO , VICINITY t Af DOCK thL� J ` oPlENT WHAFF Co. In i DE-iZW TIJ �lf��Pf30 ' - � — ✓.._��h _ � Ttun of ,_('nu{ho/d - LS'u<ffvlk 06. 'N.y — — c�- f �Lr G 4 "x 'o' 2- L F/oc7fS r Porgy/� e �Tc��L' lif i'. FUGf 07 .E-U+7.'P. IVO SCALE: /� 270' APPROVED BY DAwm BY J V `4 `';� l.omf+ . Fiuo Ar DATE: !� /: 'S6 J. I !. GEIDECAAN 80 a -4 to L`, /v ov[on YO RK 1 r P/Jf 71U+` �iD :: i�;17 i/ o�!/Ji70l c DRAW JG NUMBER - --ate - �.�T\,. . .�►�Lw'i. ..................................... ......._ ...------ -- ?.L' Tcl� ci, .,,7� y "� rT- 1 r —�I N. Y. StR;c Lic. Land Survey s tto , yµ ChA M XL I I PHO FORM 1101, VHINIEO ON In. C.AHVNINI VELLUM 0 516-477-2421 • s ,��j JDHN H. GEIDEMAN Consulting Engineer Civil-Industrial-Marine P.O. Box East Marion, New York 11939 C/I %�•�- /�o /e2 - /'err a �//cafv� I�vr��Jrmi1` z, �u„c. o-r.<.Z�o-a-r-�`��,�..a,r-e� ��C •-r-s-ytr--1 a��. Vic_ �r�i � ,�' ti / r�fic �y /ua m/' /11 r 7Le /'--r 6� r- coa� La A-C� hHe -Z✓ i% — GCAt2,u°t— ro mew York State Department of Environmental Conserva Reg uIat. ry r._ _eirs ,:nit Bid". - CC S ' i , Rm. ' 19 Stony Brook, `;, Y. 1179, TnomD5 C Joriing Comrnrssoner (516) 7:1-790i, December 11 , 1981 J. H. Geideman, P.L. S . Box 416 East Fiarion, N.Y . 11939 Re; Recuest to Modify Permit for Or Wharf Co. , uPA P10-86-1187 Dear Mr. Gc.ideman: The above referenced modification request has been reviewed by the Bureaus of *Marine Habitat Protection and S'nellfisheries, Since there is a material change in existing permit conditions" and ' in the scope of the permitted actions" (Part 621 . 12(a) (3) (i)) and indeed is contrary to special concision I'll of the subject permit, a new application (packet enclosed) is required . The Depart-.ent objects to the modification because it is a segmented e:•:pansion of facilities into SA certified waters , she cumulative res•�lt of which would be a closure. There are currently no closures in the _:rea. :his is traditionally a scallop resource area also considered viable for possibl transplants. Very truly yours, Jcsepn B. ' :ircrGental JBH: rw enc. cc: Orient V,nart Co. A. T. Kellar G. Stadnlck C. deOuillfeldt file • ( II;I �}. :Stl 1 . i AN ACV (n inrorrn+nlr IAr Orirnr Ingo 'nm enny o asc�,l fgnr y, IAGI rn- T6r 14aJ,lr njlhr .Clnle of n(v n,d .11s mmv d,, rnarl nc Jillntn ;.� 1. r"" Absnbml Bing, Thnlm,B Ynun¢ z . Ilarillnl Ynnng, 9r and snr), olhrr persons Rc note Art-, or chill t 1,rthlrr he Rssnch,lyd with 11 en, as storkholdrr•,pursnnnl to this art, ` are hrn•by rnnslllulrvl a bad)' I'^Itlir aml rorpown by the i I l." name of"Tbp Orlrnt \1hnrt ('mmpnn)�; G,r Ihr rnrnurngr- ` ment of ronlivIrn And n6n1tvdl;1 AI�oclr. rCr t„ mnlnlnin nm 01,( i.2 Said corporation keep in rrl+air their yc hn rf, nmv fS,0d At 1)rirnl^itrlbinr lnwn of Sollhnl-1 nn_I_rnnnly of Snf<�Qk+ front (lip shore 6mr rmi rd G rlFAI,1int the tut nt..C.liRrhnr, 1�. ('f with Illr�wrst rgr of rslruding sRb1 nhnrf ant. ,lictnnre net rxrrr•tliog rice hnndrr,} fe, II.IruW-.L�$liwittvr ruArk. { :1. The rnpilnl stork of snid rnmpriny shall r�n,cisl of t four lhonsnnd dolh,rs, And lip dlrhlml Into slutn•s or ,K Ucrnl}• Ilcr dollnrs enroll, ,),left Omll he deemed prrsonnl 1,roperly, and lrnnsfrrable In such mnnne" nR sold role" ny sltnll by law direct- d•I. '1•hr nnnnnl meeting or Ilia sold rhi-porntion shnil � time nu,l plarn AS the dirrdo" sbnll lip- },a held At sorb Flgunle, at whir),, not lres Ihnn three, nor more Ihan five din•elnrs ehn r`ll I• rhr+crn, who Rro required to he Stock- nolueril, alul A,Ilo sliall holtt tllcir respective offices for on6 year, or until the next nuuual meeting ; and such directors so chuscn At any annual meeting, 91In11 as some itsmny be convenient, cbuOSO out of their urea number,or lion, the other stockholders,olio president,And Olin secre- tary and treasurer, who slinll nlso held theb. respective ollices for one year, or until (heir next annual meeting. G. A majority'oC the dirrctufs shell 1'unu a Luard, and be competent to transact Roy buohltss of the said corpora- . (loll. .••e er (• 0. Ii\'hall it I_ declnr,t necrssnry l the corporation to illcl'CUSU the aulOuut of lilt! I'll 5'!ut stuck, by subscription, the board of directors slu,ll ;;ice RA Irnst ton days' notice ` thereof, In any of the ne}csl-;Ipers printed in rho county rr, ;r✓' of Sulfulk and recrive such I'ul tiler,suttscriptious to the capital, Its Ilia Fail[ corpolation aludl direct ; provided, y t t r nevertheless, flint ilia aggregate aulolil shall not exceed six thousand dollars. l ,y . 'r v,..,r... y 7. 'lTbe corporation Fhnll It: power to regulntp the i! ]v eir }c ,lr , an lrnlur oleliC red i Pssels_nt.t 'v fact Owl-cof, find to remove such Vesscls_as.-arenD"11 ploycd In recciying or disrburgIng their carnoes frou OLIO !,. } place to snother within said linlits. v t' r.e.t,,1�, § 8. To nrosecuto any' person hnving charge of R erssel e.Nx�r�e6 lying }cllhi11 the xbuyc nurned limits, who shall refuse or neglect [o calaply with rho orders of the directors,or their duly nppoiated agent, with regard to the removal of t tee vessel in their charge, and on title proof recover beG re JJ✓� any court In the county of Sutiblk, having competent U_ risdiction, rho Burn of t,euty-five dollars. Qe 9. To detain any F'Cssel refusing to pay wharfage,and o vneln w ..�..rc to remove from their l,harf At the expense of the orcner or owners, any Rrticles remaining on their wharf beyond the tinge limited fty the directors, or In the opinion of the - t✓ wharf master their remRlning would damage the ),rid oI- a•+...r 410. TO establish and collect such rates of road"• And _ for PeMISI I}'Ing by or making fast to SRId Rhnrf, andcRld - persons Inndlng articles on, or taking articles off 111d wllnrf, as shall seem to the directors reasonable and J ORIC-NT 0,� x Idd >1 < -- + MAIN cx Cplq o' o x 20' .o ro Ir N9 RF 65,CaOCK--c, E,f Cy PLGaH Vi VICINITY 14AP - Ho9sfror,�s' a,,:. �i. y ;.A•.� i /Oo /9Cfl1 Orar�ed� Af/09 MO/h Sf r Or/P f / nf �or�o f Co. L SKr p -•,;',;M>: .; '., y; �,, O/✓ io - ?o' Prlcs se� aut 5- 5'x20' �J ,Z- 6'x10f' 1 /• 5'xl}q., J,• s, e.,1 ,(J, TS- IIa Oe O( Or/C!7/, SEGT-/ ON F/oafs . Take added to �x / s. f/oa Vi J APPROVED BY !U �6- 1787 SCALE Y�. H. G E 1 D E PA A N -- /vo/r 9GENT- ; r $ fls. c3ui/f 767 NFui G/oats —Y DATE' !I /S r7 P avian e"171 5'. zo NEW YORK !!y3`f � zo' 7 {or f/o / Sec T t. Or Pnf =.:W.- ... .. .. . .. ...... .. . ._._.... DRA O NUMBER W de clo,�j� c•'�;^ ' `" '�+ a. 1 N. Y. State LIc. Land Survey "eAmrt r, rno rv",. 9r°rr rmnrrn On 92011 ciunrnw, VELLUM ....... '• APPENDIX A EAF ENVIRO;IMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART I Project Information NOTICE: This document is desioned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be considered as Part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete PARTS 2 and 3. it is expectea tnat comoletion of the EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. :LAME OF PROJECT: NAME AND ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) o_ oeot AI arr7" c (Name) ADDRESS AND NAME OF APPLLI/CANT: f / (Street `loyd l' /tl� 'c/Y. l` �f ) T1 State p w � BU9INESS PHONE: _ 3 3 - Z s 7p ZL SL26 Mali? v�dl TStreet 6-/e,2 t /V V //Z r7 sate '(ZIP) /J DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- (Briefly describe type of project or action) 0/7 /O - G 'ic 20 s /-9)c /0' F/OerJs - T Ge >� el</S 74/,9a / C141Ste.- — 0/ S �+ac�aris�30 (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable) A. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas) 1. General character of the 1 nd: Generally uniform slope _ Generally uneven and rolling or irregular 2. Present land use: Urban Industrial __ , Commercial Z, Suburban , Rural Forest Agriculture _, Other —' —' 3. Total acreage of Project area: _acres. /_/" Aoproximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Completion Meadow or Brushland _acres _acres Hater Surface Area _acres ___acres Forested _acres __acres Unvegetated (rock, earth or fill) acres _acres Agricultural —acres _acres —— Roads, buildings vetland (Freshwater or and other Paved Tidal as ner Articles surfaces acres acres 24, 21 or ".C.L.) __acres _acres -- -- Other (indicate type) _acres _acres 4. lhat is predominant soil type(s) on project site? 5. a. Sre there 9pdrock outcro?oinos on prgipct 'site? _ Yes %,C No t . "mat is depth to bedrock? feet) HENRY P. SMITH, President a JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. Lrj' TELEPHONE PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD (516) 765-1892 JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN �Al .-Yt BOARD OF TORN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 - December 18, 1987 Mr. John H. Geideman Box 416 East Marion, New York 11939 Re: AA2plication No. 594 - Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on December 17, 1987 regarding the above matter. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees TABLE the application of John H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) for a wetland permit pending receipt of a copy of a deed or right to the underwater land and a long environmental assessment form. Please submit a plan for a pump out facility for the property. Very truly yours, Henry Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachment: long assessment form cc: Commissioner Thomas C. .Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept._ Planning Board Board of Appeals Trustees Chap. 307. AN ACT to incorporate thr 0rienr Wharf Company. , Passed June 28, 1851. The People of the State of.A re-Berle, represralyd is Srn- ate and ARserably do enarl as follow.,: Q 1. Absalom King, Thomas Young, Barziliai Yo+mg,7i I - and such other persons as now nre, or shall hereafter be nssnchntrd witin Ihenn as stnrkholdcs,pnrsnant to this act, are hereby coustitnted it body pnlltic and COrporato by the name of"The Orient Whmi't ompany," for the enrourage- ment of rnnunerro and unvigation. Q 2. Sold corporation sloll have power to nmintain and wh°,r. keep in repair their wharf, now located at orient, in the town of Sonthold, and vonnty of Snifulk, and rrnrhing from the shore four hundred fit Into the bay or ha Thor, With the privilege of cxieeding sold wharf any distanro not. exceeding ilve hundred feel, final blghwater mode. Q 1. 'f'ho Capital stnek of said Company shall consist orenro-I four thousand dollars, and be divided Into shares ofii 4 twenty-flvo dollars each, whirl+ shall be deemed personal prnperty, all([ transferable In such rnnnneuas said compa- ny slialI by law direct. Q 4. The alnual metering of Ilno said ebrpnratlon shall e°°°r be held at snrh time and place as the directors shall de- signals, at which, not lose tlum three, nor more than five directors shall he chosen, who are required to he stock- , nolder8, and who shall field their respective offices for onef year, or until the next annual meeting; and such directors so chosen 'It ally annual erecting, shell as soon as may be convenient, choose out of their own number,or from the other stockholders,one president,and one secre- tary and treasurer, who shall also hold their respective Offices for one year, or until their next annual meeting. q°""'" Q 5. A majority of the dlrectui•s shall form a board, and Ile cul"Peteut to transact any busluess of the said corpora- tion. "°'°°"°°r Q U. When it Is deemed necessary by tiro corporation to Increase thei-amouut of tho present stock,by subscription, the board of directors shall give at least toll clays' notice thereof, In any of the newslnnpers printed In tiro county of Suil'olk, and receive such finrther subscrlptlons to tine capital, as the said cm-por•atinu sluell direct; provided, nevertheless, that the aggregate anuunt shall not exceed six thousand dollars. wherry°• Q 7. 171e corporation shell have power to regulate the lying of vessels at their wharf, mall within one hnudred Poet thereof, and to remove such vessels as are not cmu- ployed In recelving or disrhat:;ing their cargoes from one place to another within said limits. Penalty or Q(3. To prosecute ally person having char of a vessel o'd... lying within the abuvo named limits, who shall refuse or neglect to comply with the orders of the directors,or their duly appolnted agent, with regard to tine removal of the vessel in their charge, and on due proof recover before any court In tiro county of Sulfullc, having competent Ju- rlsdlction, the sum of twnty-llvo dollars. of 6 e whuc t1V to remove r coa , Q U. To detain an vessel refusing to pay wharfage,and fro wharf at the expense of the owner or owners, any articles remaining on their wharf beyond the time limited by the directors, or In the opinion of the ""Ier wharf master their remaining would damage the brhlgo, wh°r age. Q 10. To establish and collect such rates of wharfage for vessels, lying by or making fast to said wharf, and fur persons landing articles on, or taking articles oir sold Wharf, as shall seem to the directors reasonable and Jnst. 6. Approximate percentage of proposed oroject site with slopes: 0-10% 11-15': _%; 150 or greater _%. T. Is project contiguous to, or contain a buildinn or site listed on the National Register of Historic Places? Yes _]&No 6. What is the depth to the water table? feet 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? _Yes )e No 10. Does project site contain a y species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered - _Yes :lo, according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - _Yes I(' No. (Describe _ ) 12. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area - Yes __�LNo- 13. Does the prase t site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to the community? _Yes No 14. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Naee ; b. Size (in acres) 16. What is the dominant land use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family resid tial, R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage developed: _ acres initially; — acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped —= d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age ; developed acreage Ln��e��Q , ��. '(7 �p f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour (upon completion of project) h. if residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial Ultimate i. If: Orientation ':eighborhood-City-Regional Estimated EmDloyment Commercial Industrial 7N09j Q7�y j. Total height of tallest proposed structure _—--feet. / F HENRY P. SMITH, President .G JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. TELEPHONE Ln PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD (516) 765-1892 ELL JR. EN M. LARSEN BOARD OF 'f'Oa'N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 December 3, 1987 Mr. Joseph Hall Environmental Analyst New York State D.E.C. SUNY, Bldg. No. 40 Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: S.E.Q.R.A. Coordination Request Dear Mr. Hall: This office is in receipt of your comments and information regarding the wetland applications forwarded to your office for review. I would like to thank you, Mr. Hall, for bringing the discrepancy in the application numbers to my attention. Will you please amend your application numbers as follows: 590 John Keating 591 Dr. Stan ley Keating by En-Consultants,Inc. 592 Paul Kalunas 594 Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) by J.H. Geideman 595 Charles A. King 596 Charles Kirby 597 Frederick Raymes. By copy of this letter, I am requesting that all Departments and Agencies make the corrections also. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, as in the past. Very truly yours, Ilene Pfifferling Secretary to Board of Trustees cc: Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept. Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals T AT UBJ // DATE of / Z�/ � j! Z�- • '_ K `h6n�4 s611 t0` i-e .` �wLe. y. 1L'o /7!F �1s7i Gat ilt� ��( //�Cc47sksx(�GC��[dt4�iud�✓��aL 7y�aT pw nzyzll7�c7 AES- ZewyL 4`t S-l�P� ,EwK�r-� YgB 17�r PLEASE REPLY TO t7 . . ., SIGNED � / f� � ® �/iY ✓ ,.,L DATE SIGNED REDIFORM 4S 474 SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT - PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY. POLY PAK (50 SETS)4P474 Carboatess n� HENRY P. SMITH, President '- TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. Lr-1t` (^ ¢;. j PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD .a. .�;. •,'- -,r (516) 765.1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN �� rb BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Sou[ltold, New York 11971 November 25, 1987 Mr. John H. Geideman Box 416 East Marion, New Yorrkkj 11939 Re: Application No. 494 - Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) Dear Mr. Geideman: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during their regular meeting held on November 24, 1987 regarding the above matter. RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Main & King St. , Orient. Please be advised that the Trustees will inspect the property on December 16, 1987. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Stephen Mars, Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management John Holzapfel, Chairman, Southold Town C.A.C. Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept. Planning Board Board of Appeals file V-4 LEAD AGENCY DECLARATION: J. H. GEIDEMAN FOR FLOYD KING (ORIENT WHARF CO. ) NOVEMBER 24, 1987 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on Main & King St. , Orient. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \`U 1�7 HENRY P. SMITH, President '� TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. (616) 766.1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD `T JR ELLLEN M. LLARSEN BOARD OF TOa'N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Hain Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: November 16, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd Kirig (Orient Wharf Co. ) to extend float arrangement 501. Property is located on King Street and Orient Harbor. Henry Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Posted: Nov. 16, 1987 �A7E /a l A017) /f may CDhCekn / _ - � � 1 -- yG�. P9_c,_ _ CtP�©ice f ✓. f7� ��icr'�ir rP� a ./v. Y Sfafe Llc�elsed Zahc/ Surveyor. a r m y a yenf fv a op /y {or plar/nirs fa cah sfr�cf an f N, Y The {o//ate 119 may be re�u jred O WARF Co. T,x. /- N. yS Depf fnviron C'anservalion 2 - DePf o{ Army Corps o f �n9�nePrs 3 - caunfy � COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS: 116064 /--1 Ge ( BEING DULY SWORN DEPOS AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS , AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF , THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUq OF SAID PERMIT , IF GRANTED . In completing this application I hereby auth the Trustees agent or representative to ent onto m opert to inspect tAe premises in conjunction with revi w t is a ication. SlIbNATURE OF APPLICANT j SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF Cl--) 1 9 Y� NOTA PUBLIC UNDAi.cpppER No 482 663SS ft Of View Yw11�� Term ExPires December 31, 19 y� EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97 ) APPROVED "BOAT, DOCKS , WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED " WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED " BOATS , DOCKS , WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32 ) CONDITIONS , IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES - • I% • HENRY P. SMITH, President OHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. o TELEPHONE PHILLIP 1. GOUBEAUD (516) 765-1892 JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TORN TRCSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 November 16, 1987 Mr. Robert A. Greene Alternate Regional Permit Administrator New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, SUNY - Room 219 Dear Mr. Greene: Transmitted herewith is Wetland Application No. 494 submitted by J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Company) . We would like to coordinate with you in our role as Lead Agency regarding this application. May we have your comments on same by December 7, 1987? Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachments cc: Commissioner Thomas Jorling, D.E.C. , Albany Southold Town Building Dept. HENRY P. SMITH, PresidentL`... TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. tPr --v. i ,, _T (516) 765.1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD •.'�?L' ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 SOU[llold, New York 11971 Date: November 16, 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Attached hereto is a Short Environmental Assessment Form submitted by J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) to extend float arrangement 50'. Property is located on King Street and Orient (Harbor. Henry P% Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Posted: Nov. 16, 1987 HENRY P. SMITH, President JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. o °.� TELEPHONE PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD � ,� (516) 765-1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOV.'N TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Towti Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 November 16, 1987 Mr. John Holzapfel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Holzapfel: Transmitted herewith is application No. 494 for a Wetland Permit submitted by J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King (Orient Wharf Co. ) . Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Very truly yours, OO mtram � l 4zt N4LC----% -Smith, Henry P. President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachment EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART II Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General Information (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying that an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily ss n�ific�ant. Any large effect must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. By identifying an e eif ct in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. - The Exa les provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be aM effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (colon 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check colon 1. d. If reviewer has doubt aboutthe size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and Proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a less than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. 2. 3. SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON LAND NO YES 1. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO o PROJECT SITE? Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ner 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. construction of naved narkinq area fnr 1 ,"nn or more vehicles. _ Construction on land where bedrock is exnosed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. — _ Construction that will continue for more than 1 vear or involve _ more than one nhase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 _ tons of natural material (i.e. rock or soil) per vear. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. -5- 1 • • 1. Z. 3. STALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE iODERATE LARGE REDUCED CY L'aPr- !"PACT PROJECT CHANGE gther Imoacts' 6. I41LL PROJECT ALTER DRAINAGE FLOC', PATTV'IS OR SIIRFACE !IATER An YES RUNOFF? ................................... ................OO - Example that 'lould Anply to Column 2 Project would impede flood water flows. _ Proiect is likely to cause substantial erosion. _ Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. — Other impacts: - f MPACT ON AIR NO YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?...........................0 0 Fxamples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will induce 1.000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. — Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. — Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 _ lbs. Der hour or a heat source nroducing more than 10 — million BTU's per hour. Other Imoacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMAIc 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR ENOANAERED SPECIES? NO YES O 0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York _ or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or — found on the site. Removal of anv portion of a critical or significant wild- life hA41Lit_ — ADplicatinn of Pesticide or heibicide over more than t0ce a vearother than fcrayr:eultugl purposes. nt"ar impacts: 9. 4ILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT IRM-THREATENED OR NO YES EM0ANGEREO SPECIES? ........ ...............................0 0 Example that Would Apply to Column 2 r ro]ect would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. — Proiect reauires the removal of more than 11) acres of _ mature forest (over lOn Years in ane) or other locally imoorrant vegetation. -7- 1. 2, 3. "ALL Tn nCTENTIAL C.A5 It-PACT BE 40DERATE L,PGE DEDUCED nY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CPANSE I"nACT C: ':JS:'4L PPS"'.'PCE 10. i:II.L THE PPOIFCT AFFECT VIF11S. °ISTAS C? T4F `If SDAL "Io vES CHARACTER OF THE NFIGHBORPoOD OP CO--'"IlTv? . ...... 00 Examnles that I'ould Applv to Column 2 _ An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction _ of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surroundino landscape. A project easily visible, not easily screened,tllat is obviously different fron nthzrs around it. _ Project will result in the elimination or major — screening of scenic views or vistas known to be _ important to the area. Other impacts: — IMPACT ON HIATQRIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT IMPACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES PRE-HISTORIC OP. PALEONTOnICAL 1YPOPTANCE? .................0 0 Examples that Would Aooly to Column 2 _ Pro.iect occurino wholly or nartially within or contiguous — to any facility or site listed on the National Renister of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE & RECREATION 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU'IITIES?...... 00 Examples that Would Aoply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational 0000rtunity, — A major reduction of an open space important to the community. — Other impacts: _ IMPACT nN TRANSPORTATION 13. PILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION 110 YES SYSTEMS? .. ........................... ..... ........ ..... 00 Examples that would Annlv to Column 2 _ Alteration of present patterns of movement of People — and/or goods. Proiect will result in severe traffic problems. Other impacts: q SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT CE MODERATE LAPGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IVACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON ENERGY 14. 61ILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY? ......................................... ..0 O Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project causing greater than 54 increase in any form of _ energy used in municipality. Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE ODORS, NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT? ....0 0 Examples that Uould ADoly to Column 2 Blasting within 1 ,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). _ Project will Produce operating noise exceedinn the _ local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. Protect will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HEALTH 6 HAZARDS NO YFS 16. TILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? ... ......... O O Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will he a chronic low level discharge or emission. - Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" _ (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc. , includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases. ) .orace facilities fnr one million or more gallnns of liouified natural gas or oiler liouids. Itner imoacts� SPIALL T POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE ODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY R'PACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON GPOWTH AND CHARACTER 0� C011PUNITY r�P NEh;PH.1RH000 17. 1.11-1 PPOJEC' AFF:.:T TPr WPrv;TEP " THE 0..;"TWIG NO YES C04MUNITY" .. . . .. ... ... ... . ... . ... . . .. . . .. . . .... .. . ..OO Example that Would Apply to Column 2 The population o` the City, Town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 51, of resident human population. _ The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or overa- ting services will increase by more than 57 per +ear as a result of this project. _ Will involve anv oermenent facility of a non-agricultural — use in ar agricultural 9istrict or remove nr,me agricultural lands from cultivation. _ The project will reolace or eliminate existing fan lit'es, — structures or areas of ristoric importance to the community. Development will rnduce an influx of a particular age group with Special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. — _ Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or no re — businesses. Other impacts: NO YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT' . -.... 00 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Either government or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the Project from within the community. IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A PmTEHTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I __ PART II __ PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 , 2 and 3) and considerinq both the maonitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, O is one which may not cause significant damaae to the environment. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the envy ronment, there will not be a significant effect in this case PREPARE A NEGATIVE DECLARATION because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been O included as part of the nroposed project. C. The project will result in one or more ajnr odverse impacts :'PEP^RE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS that cannot be reduced and ma, cause significant damage to 0 the environment. rate S,gnat ure o£ P=saonsiole Official in Lead Agencv iiarature of Prenarer iif Jiff=front from resnonsinle offir_er:. 'girt nr [,-e nare of ,esoonsible offc,al r Ley] ,_.•. In EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS INFORMATION - Part 3 is prepared if one cr more impact or effect is considered to be potentially lame. - The amount of writing necessary to answer part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? INSTRUCTIONS Complete the followinq for each impact or effect identified in Column 2 o` Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. _ 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a less than lame impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonahle to conclude that this impact is important to the minicipality (city, town or villaqe) in which the project is located. To answer the question of importance, consider: - The probability of the impact or effect occurrinq - The duration of the impact or effect - Its. irreversibility, including permanently lost rewurces or values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals - Whether known objections to the project apoly to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or more) impact is determined to both lame and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is important. PAPT III STATEMENTS (Continue on Attachments, as needed) 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? er Yes No b, Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? __Yes X_No c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval 1' r (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) /(/Date) Q City, Town, Village Board / Q.rLVLi,` _. iy fr) `�,.'t — City, Town, Village Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board ----— City, County Health Department Other local agencies Other regional agencies -- State Agencies op Q,ryy� Federal Agencies L, w C. INFORNATIGNAL DETAILSId Attach any additional information as ma be ngeded to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the taken to mitigate or avo hem. posal;'Please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: - e-c'Ei'—>-•--sr." TITLE: REPRESENTING: G/ CU , DATE: Z -4- 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - _)`-C_kA4 tons cubic yards. 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers; will be removed from site - _acres. - v a. Will any mature forest (over 190 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project' _les —No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? Yes __V_No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). to Ola71� 7, If multi-,,hased oroject: a. Total number of pha\cipated No. It. Anticipated date ofphase 1 _month —ear (including demolition) c. Approximate complet phase month wear. d. Is phase 1 financiaon subseauent phases? Yes _No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? _Yes __�LNo 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _: after project is complete 0. 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes No. If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? _Yes _No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? _Yes �No. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes _No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? Yes X—' No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disnosal facility be used? _Yes --NO c. If yes, give name: location d. 11ill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? _Yes __No 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? _Yes No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Der day)? Yes —.4—No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes _No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Yes —X—No. If yes, indicate type($) 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity gal /minute. 21. Total anticipated water usage per day _ __orals/da v. 22. Zoning: a. Ilhat is dominant zoning classification of site? It. Current specific zoning classification of site C. Is nropoced use consisten- "ith Present zoninn' d. If no, indicate desired zoning 777- t �e �FFOLY�,G :ryyol � �bo TELEPHONE } (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES I TOwN OFSOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Blain Road ) P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 I March 2, 1987 Mr. J. H. Geideman f - ` P. 0. Box 416 {{ East Marion, New York 11939 Re: Floyd King - Wetland Application 482 I Dear Mr. Geideman: j The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees regarding j the above -application. WHEREAS, J. H. Geideman on behalf of Floyd King applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated December 16, 1986, and WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on February 26, 1987 at which time all interested persons were- given an opportunity to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and ! WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT J? RESOLVED that J. H. Geideman on behalf of Kloyd King BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMI UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Set out 8 floats in place of existing piles for mooring of small boats. Property is located off the Company wharf at the foot of King Street, Orient Harbor, Orient. i This permit will expire on February 26, 1988 if work has not commenced by said date. There are two inspections required and the Trustees are to be notified upon the completion of the work. Prior to the issuance of said permit by the Clerk, the applicant 14:16 4(2/87)—Text 12 - • •• I O Eti LD. NUMBER ^ • 617.21 C Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORILI For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART [—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) r4. PRECISE PLICANT/SPONSOR �+ 2. PROJECT NAME 4i'/e'!7 f W�irr� OJECT LOCATION: Municipality County , LOCATION (Street address antl road intersections, promment landmarxs, etc.,or provide a :� ----------------- 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: • New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. ;OUNT BE PROJECT BRRIEFLY: 7. OF LAND AFFECTED: y acres Ultimately acres 6. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIOr4S? WYes ❑No If No, describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAhD USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ❑Residential ❑Industrial YCommeraal ❑Agrmuilure ❑Park/Fore s VOpen space Describe: ❑C'ther 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL, OR FUND!NG, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDEF STATE OR LOCAL)? , VYes ❑No If yes, list agency(s) and permitlapprovals ny.y. s o.E C. %y/rmc :Ps. Cn s! ' ad 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR A gOygL� El Yes Nflo If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PER4ITIAPPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION' ❑Yes ❑No I CERTIFY TPAT THE IH/FORMATiON PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNO:VLECGE Appl¢anusp or na e: �C/f2!' _ s . Signature: r If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessrnent form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT ITO he completed by Agel A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 ,,CRH, PART 617.12? If yes, coordinate Ire rew;.v nrocees and use Ire FULL e: ❑Yes 1-1 No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS WOVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.61 If No,a negative dec. may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may oe handwritten, if legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwaterquality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns• sold waste production or d! potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural,archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood cnaracler? Expl3u CJ. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats.or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: Gt. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of Iai.d or other natural resources?Explai C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain brierly. C6. Long term, short term,cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl C5? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain bnerly. D. IS THERE. GR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTRO',ERS'e RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADt EPEE ENVIPCN;,IENTAL IMPACTC? ❑Yes ❑No If Yes, explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise sign Each effect should be assessed in connectio, with its (a) Setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) durat. irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensu explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressc ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which M occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any support documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impa. AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: o.ui A,•„icv 111.111 ,n Lo.a nl;unoV Imr ai rr,u..n,.bir Ulmer Lxnaiwa of Hi,,ric Lle Ulocer ,n -cad TxrncY egndwrc or Yrcpd rrr Ilr u,n:rtnr v..m m+yan,a'.�e ou•uvl U.nc 2 �. J. �..: � v� TELEPHONE BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES (516) 765-1892 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS , ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS , FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. (/APPLICATION NO. ]�I q DATE OF APPLICATION -7�� /O IDENTITY OF APPLICANT � —ezl- ----- - CO�PHONE N° ADDRESS OF APPL I CANT__ �/�(r/r/ S}-_#, Sf-_--_---J- ---------------- rax MAP No. �C /eYmifl�?2 ......—.... ------------ AGENT ✓•!1 L7E+�p�P_/�l p/�' ----------- -- - -_-PHONE N( ---//-��-------------------------------- PERMIT REQUESTED TO e)CxC d ----------------r'-� _Zf ----------- LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH- PERMIT WANTED N -- _--------iflh�t `_AcQ----------------------- HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATIOr --✓. r,�. C�. _i3o x i_6_=_f_'_ /✓lari v_2_Ni'_ 7 j�---------------------- CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY f- �T'�r✓6CJY _-_----- SIZE OF PROPOSED WORK-_ Lt 7 ['/U Sj�[a� J!'O' n/ _ ? LENGTH 5a1 '�L .WIDTH 60 , 7 ----------------------------------- HEIGHT ABOVE HIGH WATER DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED 1?` CI"1w YARDS TO BE FILLED Ncne WIDTH OF CANAL, CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY a/.e'n r DEPTH AT LOW TIDE 4—/ � AVERAGE RISE IN DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL LODE FT . DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE AREA IS THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE? epD/CBS _ NCO car IN AREA ZONING lrncwsfriar/ MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED ----------------------------- -------------------------------- INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY MO--_C !Qyic OUS-i oe:'-- S ---------- ------ DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE ------------------------ AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMEr, AGENCY --------------------- =` -----�------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY ----------- --------- -� ----------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY , IF NOT THE SAME AS THE APPLICANT . ------------- -`-- c'nT 7` ---------------------------- ARE THERE ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS IN YOUR DEED TEI:;T [MOULD PROHIBIT THIS PROJECT? -h?r • ,14:16 4(2/87)—Text 12 • PROJECT I.D. NUP,IBER 617.21 SE Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME J. PROJECT LOCATION: 15� Municipality County 4. PRECISE LOCATION(street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks, etc.,or provide ollapfI 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: New ❑Expansion ❑Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: /J r� �1 _ // a,c � m C:CLt/J u-{ /L C� R�2ri7 Y'7� > aJ77'� dam/ K ,.2A�J-tio� /*/7 7. A 10UNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? lWYes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ❑ tial ❑�ndu;tnal DescricrDe: Commercial ❑AgncuiLure ❑ParklForestiOpen space ❑Other be: - 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERA STATE OR LOCAU? �RrYes ❑No If yes, list agency(s) and permit/approvals ^/,Y 5' 0.6 C. po- 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR A ROVAL? ❑Yes NNo If yes, list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ❑t10 I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TTJR�UE�TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AppuCanUep, or na e: �` /I2 O/ /JG/'L.�L✓7 sy�L[ Dale: Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II—ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Age. A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY HYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL E%AP. ❑Yes ❑No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? if No,a negative declarat may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, If legible) Cl. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or dlspe potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological, historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain br CJ. Vegetation or fauna, fish,shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats.or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: Cd. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain b C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Long term, short term, cumulative,or other effects not identified in Of C5? Explain briefly. C7. Other impacts(including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE, CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS' ❑Yes ❑No It Yes. explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise signific Each effect Should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability Of occurring; (c) duration irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which AIM occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. - ❑ Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supportinc documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impact: AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons Supporting this determination: n„.....or i rad n,;,ncV rvmt ur Ispe tiara•m HvWomblu Uniuv in L.aJ ApcncV Lue ui nc.Vum.uie Uuuer ]ignem¢•ur Kesponsible Unicer ,n Lc d Agency )•gnatwe or r reparer Jt Jinerem v:nn rtvLmnuote muctq Dnc 2 > 1 , �• I- o o '� I N ;< ` io r v c ger�.; C j _7o'x 4•'-r n!i ; "' -._-���- . _ H x . n C�x 2 L'" 3 �v0�� \Plig7r.26 - V. h j o vdN9rZFCo.ppcK `-, R � ?` I 4i B�Is' �. „ � iC-niT NAR�2 old ��, , Vi © L °4Cv LOCK, \�\c4Ls ------------------------ �, ti E{S7 J 7��So• 01 VIC �. �.� � `� P 2 G_ '• ' -� t j' aii:;.f f i o /Poo owe 'uoc I J{reY `�' �., O/✓ iU - _u' i-: i- Sef ©u ' S- 5 '- �� ' =- E •xG" s /- �'� ;•a' t� SCALE: ' I • ✓' APPRDVED BY L --' bRAWj BV a' l7 Al C' /.•h';: DATE: /l ;/: r7 H' N1 H. 1, EMAN _—'- �rl DEC r 4 L',✓' L _.v Z 1.• f^%D Oj i•�.•" C, E. i,Q DRAW NG NUMBER N. Y St=:c sic. Lind Survey -t�j� CHARRETTE PRO FORM 920VE PRINTED ON 920H CHARPRINT VELLUM on Ic