The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-5354 · TERMS and CONCmONS The permittee Richard Bingham I 1\ residiag at 1 Maritime Place. Suite 2525. San Fran. CA 94111 N. Y.,as part_ of the coosideratiOD for the issuance of the Permit does uødeøw>d and prescribe to the fol- lowing: 1. That the said Board of Trustees aød the Town of Soutbold lite re1eued from ID.Y oød all damages, or claims for damages, of suits uisiøg directly or htdirecdy as · resølt of ID.Y oper- ation perfocmed punuant to this permit, oød the aid P-õ_ will, ac his or her own ~ defend ID.Y and all søch soits-..:ff-.d by third pudes, oød the said p~ -- fol11iab11hy with respect theretO, to the coø>pl- --'-'0<> of the Board of Trøsœes of the Town of SoaIhoLl 2. That this Petmk is valid for . period of 2 4 moo. which is <(DSi~ 'ed to be the estimated time required to complete the wodt in~hed, but iboald circaIi1staøCeS wunør, œquest for an e<œmÍon may be made to the Board at a later daœ. ~. That this. permit should be retained indefinitely, or as long as the aid Permittee wishes to maintain the strUCtUfe or project involved, to provide evidence to anyone coøcemed that aøtb- ~on_~~yoo~ - 4. 'That the wod< ~Ived will be subject to the inspection and approval of the Board or its agents, and DOD-comPIiaøce with _ the provisions of the orlgi_tl..g application, may be cause for revocation of this Permit by <esolutioø of the said Board. S. That there will be no uøreasoøable interference with navigation as a result of the wodt herein uithorized. 6. That there shan be DO interference with the right of the public to pus and repass a10ag the beach between high and low water marks. 7. That if future operations of the Town of Soutbold ~ the removal aød/or úœntioøs in the location of the 'WOd< herein aa¡o~ or if, in the opløioø of the Boud of T...-, the - 'WOIX shall cause unreasonable obsltUCl1OD to free navig>onO", the said p"""¡..- will be requiœd. apoo due DOtice, to remove or alter this 'WOd< or project herein stated witboat ~pemcs to the Town of Southold. 8. That the said Board will be notified by the Permittee or 1he campletiOl1 of the wodt aøtb- orlzecl. 9. That the Permittee will ootain all other permits and -- that may be required sap- plemental to this permit which may be subject to ~Iœ upon failure to obcoin -. - .> . . Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) '/65-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD June 25, 2001 Keith B. Neilson, P.E. Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Mystic, CT 06355 RE: RICHARD BINGHAM Central Ave., Fishers Island SCTM#6-4-2 Dear Mr. Neilson: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Thursday, June 21,2001 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Docko, Inc. on behalf of RICHARD BINGHAM applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of South old, application dated May 25, 2001, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on June 21,2001, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southoll! Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, 2 . . NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees approve the application of RICHARD BINGHAM to remove 5+/- cy. of stone over an area of 300+/- sf. ITom a docking area and dispose of, undeIWater. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years ITom the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Fees: None Very truly yours, atL--I (J /4._~~i~f a,. ~. , ,- Albert 1. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJKIlms cc: DEC ACE Dept. of State . . Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New. York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Tuesday, June 12, 2001, the following recommendation was made: RICHARD BINGHAM 6-4-2 to remove 5+/- cy. of ston~ over an area of 300+/- sf. from a docking area and dispose of, underwater. Central Ave., Fishers Island The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. --1 r- 6' CLEAR ~,,\ 2 c; HTL EL 3.4 M~EL 23 MI..WE:I..0.0 DET~fL TOP OF 1lE: OFF PILES E:1..18 TOP OF PILES 9.0 DE:CK EL 5.0 NOT TO 5C.ALE TOP OF I<.AII.. 155 DE:CK EL 120 STONES TO BE DROPPED OR RESET CI..EAR OF SLIP æL. 5AASS STONES TO BE REMOVED REMOVE S: CY OF STONE lOVER 300± S~F FROM SUP I 1<ELOCA1l0N 00 ~ ~ Tf 1lE:-OFF PI~~(",,:! 15'C~ \-'.-, µ HTL EL 3.4 MHW EL 2.3 MI..W EL 0.0 , .' PB'IMIT II 1-4738-01599/00001 NOT YE:T CONS-mtJCTED 00 6' PF<~F/LE 1 - 2 CF STONES IN SUP TO BE REMOVED, RESET OR DROP STONES 10' TO 20' SOUTH 6OULDE:R I UNIFOI<ML. Y SLOPED. RAMP 1:10 MAX IWCKY SHOI'1EFIWNT 61 STI'1EWN WI 6OULDE:RS COASTAL. BUJFF 6X6 u:va. LANDIN5 ¡tlS1EPS'~~.~.>.:' ,'....J ì 15' LEAR LADDEJ<J..) ~ I ~OO ~rt r~æ'~ 9nll \ F/S:ERS ISL.,A..N~æD I'JI.. IU I SC>UN= ~ PL......-A..N "v"1 E'V'v" I: I SPARTl'1 ~ .. NORf'H SRAPHIC 5C.AU: r = Xl I 2D o I 2D PROJE:CT: STONE REMOVAL l.DCA1lON: RSHE:RS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOl.ffiiOLD SUFFOLK COUN'TY, NE:W YORK WAiERWAY: FlSHE:RS ISLAND SOUND DA1E: ~L.30,2OO1 APPUGANT: ~ BIN5HAM "';,~ .o6E:NT: SHæT 2 OF 2 DOCKO, INC. KÆItn B. NoUson. PE M"sflc. cr 06355 860 572-8939 OW5 96-09-705,10 Dock<>. Inc. 5/912001 2:S4 PM Blng-2.dwg '. " , , ' ·'1. ".' ) ) '. . (C\ ..-/ .' 1° \ \ . /~~. '....\.. " " r---t-A.P REF. 0iART12372 I GAAPHK:: 5C.ALE 1000 YAi/D5 NOTES: 1. ELEVATlON DAruM LS MEAN LOWE!< LO\.V WATER 2 TlDE DATA IS TAKEN A<OM 11-IE 1996 NOAA TlDE TABLES. 3. PROJECT DESCF/lPTlON: REMOVE S. Ç( OF STONE OIÆRAN AREA OF 3000 SF PROM A DOCKING AREA AND DiSPOSE OF UND6ZWATER 4. PROJECT I'IJRPOSE 11-ILS LS A Pl<lVA1E DOCK FOR RECI<EATlONi'L BOATlNG. 5. 11-IESE APPUCATlON Dl<AWlNGS REPRESENT A CLASS P" SUI'ZIIEY FOR ~rr I'IJRPOSES. 11-IEY AAE NOT CONSmJCTlON CONmACT DOCUMENTS. 6. ADJOINING PROPEI<TY O\.VNERS: EAST: MAR'r' MURPHY 1 EAST 66Tl-I ST. NEW YOFII< CrTY, NY 10021 !-.W, WEST: TO\.VN OF SOlJT1-lOlD 53095 MAIN RD, P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD, NY 11791 - . I ~ f»! I¿i r ~~=~=~:~E c::J'V"EF<"ALL PLAN ~ ~ ~ mIl! PI<OJECT: STONE I<EMOVAL , , , 1 L.. ' F/SHER-'S ISLAND HAWKS NEST POINT I I. (~$- f (I U. ,I ~~ I - ~RPriY l,// dl \~/·- t(·~<>?--·:l ..·d· o . .~ . 'F"" . . . :::. . . . :.i .. lIE·:····,· ... .." .., - . :. PI<OPER1Y"',' \ .... .... ..,. ..... OF....·,· . . ... ....... . ·.\'~ING~ -, '. ~, ,/ , ,. , " , ~. / .,. , E ~S W ~ SCALE r_lOO' I 100 o I 100 50 PROJECT: STONE I<EMOVAL LOCA TlON: ASHERS ISLAND. TO\.VN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOl..J<:: COUr-rTY. NEW YOFII< WATERWAY: ASHERS LSl.AND SOUND DATE: API<IL. 30, 2001 APPL.JCANT: RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 1 OF :2 DOCKO, INC. KaHn B. Ne....., PE Myri:;, cr 06355 BÆ50 572-8939 I . , ! I , I '.' , I , I ___I. I , I , I , 1 " ,JO-- \, --- " " LOCATION MAP flL9f~-- Project: Waterway: Location: "Stone Removal" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Rlcbard Bingham April 30. 2001 n_ .___0___0 ~ Seaftower Reef Light Applieant: Date: + ~ ~7" . -~ ~~ /. . \,o\< _ ~i ~JJkWo\.~ / " _ S. " ~~_/ , mT' .__2L~~____ ~ s \\--Þ___ \ s //:'riré;ff.~~~ \I¡ '. ,,1\ . , ~ - / ~./' ~ '" " ~ / ,,/' ~ / ,,/' ~ / ,,/' ~ ~ uth \ mpllng , . .,' ~cj¡7';(.. . ~. {r~;:nTk ~ .' ,_. __.' '-..1,/ " {) \J f. '. . 'ffft· 'I' ,J/ ~s ! ¡I/Ç 1,\/,' . '. J. " " s 0 " ¡-..- , I , I , I .~ I I I , J ,. I / ! x' J...... ....."" /' ''S>.... . ------------oL/ ,,/' / ,,/'~ / ,,/'~ ~ ~ '1 " / " '--.-- - '- , ,2i· [." \, , '\ '" .. ... I " -.._----- ---- ~~. " " " s 0 U Slo Boa .. ,-.?<-' ~ ," ' ~. ',,1 "" " t·.- .~- . 6-_ .. 'L -- -"---------=---.:... ,. y'''-'~.\ " . " .... .... - ... ,Iic---~.:: .". . . .t'·SMi.28 / IFJ~lzabe ISLAND.'" " ---~. SOÌj .~. Nfl.- -- -'- 'J .. , ¡¡ LOC ¡( '.1. ,. / -' ~ / ¡pO ~_H___ - <!~.., .]0' - " <0, I I...tt-~ 'Q. " ~. !.I-'.... !¡ I -=--71. I " \D I_~ !o '0 ~I ...;;&" ~!~I; 111'1 Jt!il ~ : r:¡" . ~. "." :':'.' .Ii"' H:~i it ~f. ¡¡ri, 10 'III ;:; 1,1, I··,.·· 1;'1',1', ~p~H ;:111: I..'~·· ",,"I ¡;hÙ c ~ c 0 % ; C 0 ~ ~ . , . ! ¡ ¡ ¡ . + . . , t < . ~: o CI ¡ ~ v . ~ E. I V1J:ii ~ .. o ó':: >- ¡'II ... )0.:0 § ~"i o g ~ U,:: <91 ~ '. '7 ........ -. I ~~. . + . ~ , , , ", ,I il I I I " ,..2. , ~ ;- , , , ~ .. ~ ~ , ~ ! I I it! JÍ 1! ... "5 ~s ... - " , ~t: ... 0 ,: 0>0 '. ... i ~ .i.1 ~ f¡j~~! ~ ~...";~f¡,- !! '" e==g.!!~ ~ i ; ~ ~ ~:3::¡U= . ¡ i ~ ..i:i::!!!t~ ..' I' 114'''0'';: :1, ¡,¡ 0.11"-;"· ,,' ~ ¡;j.!l.!! æ'" " .",,,,,,, < , ~ ,., .'. t:1 ~ ¡:, ... ~ ,I .. .. II .. II - ~08 II ... .~.! .. 'ã.E ~~j ..... <Q , ;!! j ~ , !........ ' -I ¡ J ¡ i· :' '1 , /' '0.. ('L- e I~ '!<-' - -' \_~~. ~ ./ ! ; . RICHARD BINGHAM STONE REMOVAL APRIL 30, 2001 . . ...... , -'-:'J -'.' . J-..- - \~~ ,.. . -- ~ ''''-0 -/.. .~ ~ '.,~----- - ~~._- -- - , ~!'- . ~._~. .. ~ '~"... ,g. ~.' ~:-:.~<!. ABOVE: VIEW OF ROCK REMOVAL AREA ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PIER AS VIEWED IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION. BELOW: VIEW OF ROCK REMOVAL AREA ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PIER AS VIEWED IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION. ." _.___r ------,.-- ._",":, '-. , ,- ...- ,'to -~ ~ l:.~ ~ , ---.:.... , ----- ~ :::---- ,~ ~ /:~ .~ f5';'. .. ....,>---. . i__~_ ~ ,- ,- ').. ,. :,' :""~" , . - -, ,.... '. . tn ('oJ >. co_ ~:. - . . Docko. Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net May 21,2001 Mr. James Haggerty U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacob Javits Federal Center, Room 1937 New York, New York 10278-0090 Re: Richard Bingham Stone Removal Dear Mr. Haggerty: On behalf of Mr. Richard Bingham, we request a Department of the Army General Permit for stone removal on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: .:. Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: "Stone Removal" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of South old Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham April 30, 2001 Applicant: Date: .:. Two copies of Corps of Engineers and NYS DEC Application Forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, photographs and NYS DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form. I trust that you will fmd this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INC. ¡W~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Mr. Richard Bingham NYS DEC: Roger Evans Town of South old: Krupski File: 96-06-705 BINGHAM .25 . APPUCATlON FOR D~MENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT . I~MB APPROV At NO. 0710.003 ( 3 CFR 325) Expires October 1996 Public reporting burden for Ibis collection of informarion is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the lime for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.. Send comments regarding this burden estimate of any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden. to Department ofDefensc. Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of onnronnation Operations and Reports., 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington. VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management ami Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (071.0-0003), Washington. DC 20503. Please 00 NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the Disbict Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT Authority: 33 use 401, Section 10; 140. Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, navigable waters aCthc United States the discharge of dredged or fill makrial into waters aCme United States., and the b1U1SpOf1ation of dredged material fur the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Infunnation provided on this furm will be used in evaluating this application for a permit. Disclosure: Disclosure of request cd information is is voluntaJ'y. Ifinfurmarion is not provided, however, the permic applicalion cannot be processed nor can a pennit be issued. One see of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be auachcd to this application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction oftbc proposed activity. An application thai is nol completed in full will be returned. (ITEMS ( THRU4 WBEFlLLEDBYTHECORPS) I. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE COOE 3. DATE RECEIVEO 4.DATE APP. COMPLETED ITEMS BELOWW BE FILLED BY APPUCANT 5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AlJfHORlZED AGENT'S NAME & TITLE RICHARD BINGHAM DOCKO, INC. KEITH B. NEILSON, P.E., PRESIDENT 6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS I MARITIME PLACE, SUITE 2525 P.O. BOX 421 SAN fRANCISCO, CA 94 111 MYSTIC, CT 06355 7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NO'S W/AREACOOE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NO'S W/AREA CODE a. Residence a. Residence b. Business (415) 788-7354 b. Business (860) 572-8939 II. STATEMENT OF AlJfHORlZATION [ hereby authorize. DOCKO, INC. 10 act in my behalf as my agenl in the processing of this application and to furnish. upon request, supplemental infunnatioo in support ~ca'iOD' D~f If¡ h. ~L ~ ~f APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE RICHARD BINGHAM NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY 12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (See instructions) STONE REMOVAL 13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOW (ifapplicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADORESS (ifapplicable) fISHERS ISLAND SOUND CENTRAL AVENUE 15. LOCATION OF PROJECT SUfFOLK NY COUNTY STATE 16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS. IF KNOWN, (See instructions) SITE IS LOCATED ON fiSHERS ISLAND SOUND JUST WEST Of THE WEST HARBOR ON THE NORTH SHORE Of HAWK'S NEST POINT. 17. OIRECTlONS TO THE SITE UPON DISEMBARKING THE fERRY, HEAD TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER Of FISHERS ISLAND TO CENTRAL A VENUE. (PLEASE REfER TO ASSESSOR'S MAP) ENG FORM 4345. Feb. EDlTlON OF SEP 911S OBSOLETE. (Pro¡ionentCECW-OR . . 18. Nature of Activity (Description of project. include all features) REMOVE 5 (+1_) CY OF STONE OVER AN AREA OF 300 (+1-) SF FROM A DOCKING AREA AND DISPOSE OF, UNDERWATER. 19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project. see instructions) THIS STONE REMOVAL [S AT A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. THIS STONE REMOVAL WILL ALLOW SAFE BOAT BERTHING FOR THE APPLICANT. USE BLOCKS 10-12 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED 20. Reason (s) fur Discharge N/A 21. T)pe (5) ofMatcrial Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards N/A 22. Surtàce Area in Acres of Wetlands or Othcr Wafers Filled (see instructions) N/A 23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes NoX IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK 24. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners., Lessees.. Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (ifmore than can be enrered here., please attach a supplemental list). SOUTH; MARY MURPHY, 1 EAST 66TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10021 NORTH: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, 53095 MAIN RD. P.O. 1179, SOUTHOLD, NY 1179t 25. List ofOiher Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received ftom O[her Federal. Stale or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application AGENCY NYS DEC TYPE APPROVAL' TIDAL WETLANDS !DENT. NUMBER PENDING OA TE APPLIED DATE APPROVED PENDING DATE DENIED TOWN OF SOlJfHOLO PENDING PENDING .Would include but is not rcstrictcd to zoning, building and flood plain permits. 26. Application is hereby made for a pennif or permits 10 authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the inforrna ion in mis applicalion is complet' and acc~ .~rJ ~ a,"lhority to U1Ji9-"]:, described herein or Iya fuorizod hflbe apPlicant5(-Z 101 SIGNAT~ DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE RICHARD BINGHAM IŒITH B. NEILSON. P.E., DOCKO. INC. The application nwst be signed by the peJSOn who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorim:l agent ¡fthc SlBtement in block II has been filled out aßd signed. 18 U.S.c. Section 100 I provides that: Whoever. in any manncr within the jurisdiction of any department or agency oftbe United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals. or covers up any trick, scheme, or discuises a material "fact or makes any mise, fictitious or ftaudulenl statements. or represcntatiom or makes or uses any làlse writing or document knowing same to contain any mise, fictitious or ftaudulcnt statements or entry, shall be 6ned not more !ban S 10,000 or imprisoned not more than fivc years or both. ·U.S.GPO: 1994-510-478/82018 . . Cocko J Inc. p.o. Box 421, Mystic. CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net May 21, 2001 Mr. Roger Evans NYS DEC, Regulatory Affairs Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Richard Bingham Stone Removal Dear Mr. Evans: On behalf of Mr. Richard Bingham, we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit as necessary, for stone removal on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose the following in support of this permit application: .:. Four prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: Applicant: Date: "Stone Removal" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham April 30, 2001 .:. Four copies of the NYS DEC Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, Photographs and Location plan. I trust that you will fmd this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, DOCKO, INC. ¡{;jJ~YL- Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Mr. Richard Bingham US ACOE: Haggerty Town of South old: Krupski File: 96-06-705 BINGHAM r: . " 95.19-3110/981-<1 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DEC APPLICATION NUMBER DISTRIBUTION 1 ST COPY 2ND COPY 3RD COPY '(TH COPY 5TH COPY Permit Administrator Corps of Engineers Program NY5 Agency Applicant JOINT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT" -* If.iiIf.i ~ us ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1. PleaslI read AU instrudions on bock. Check permits applied for. AHoch additional information as needed. o FRESHWATER WETlANDS IiJ TIDAL WETLANDS 0 WATER SUPPLY 0 LONG ISLAND WELL o PROtECTION OF WATERS FOR, o A. Construction or placement of docks and moorings 0 B. Construction, reconstruction, or repair of a DAM or other impoundment structure o C. Disturbance of a STREAM BED or BANKS or excavation in or fill of NAVIGABLE WATERS 0 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION o COASTAl EROSION CONTROL 0 lAKE GEORGE PARK COMMISSION (Doc:ks and Moorings) 0 WILD, SCENIC OR RECREATIONAL RIVERS o AQUATIC PEST CONTROL FOR: 0 A. Aquatic Vegetation Control 0 B. Fish Control 0 C. Insect Control o lEASE, LICENSE, EASEMENT, or other real property interest in state-owned lands under water 0 UTilITY EASEMENTS (Pipelines, Conduits, Cables, etc.) 2. LIST PREVIOUS PERMIT/APPLICATION NUMBERS AND DATES (If any) 3. IF OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAl.., PROVIDE TAXPAYER 10 NUMBER 1-4738-01599 00001 7 31 97 .... APPLICANT IS AlAN: [] Owner 0 Operator 0 lessee 0 Municipality/Governmental Agency (Check 05 many 05 apply) 5. NAME OF APPLICANT (use full nome) o Agent MAILING ADDRESS 1 Maritime Place Suite 2525 POST OFFICE San Francis= 6. NAME OF OWNER (if different than number 5 aboye) DOwner «J Agent/Contact Person MAJlING ADDRESS P. O. Box 421 POST OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER (Dgytime) M ti 7. PROJECT/FACILITY LOCATION {mark l(Kotion on mop, see number 10 on reyerse sidel County I Town/City/Villoge ADDRESS (including street or rood} 100n-6-4-? ITax Mop S'ectlonl8loc"VLot Number TelEPHONE NUMBER (daytime) Central Avenue POST OFFICE Fishers Island B.NAME OF STREAM OR BODY OF WATER {on or near project silel ZIP CODE 06390 DEC USE ONLY NYTM-E NYTM-N .4 9. Name of USGS QUAD MAP Fisher 1 d un 10. HAS WORK BEGUN ON PROJECn (If YES, o"ach explanation on starting work without permit, include dotes) Show work on map or drawing 0 res aNa 6 15 01 12. APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DATE 13. PROPOSED USE: 1.4. WILL PROJECT OCCUPY STATE lAND' 6 30 01 UPriyote 0 Public 0 Commercial 0 Yes 0 No 15. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED PURPOSE: ¡e.g. quantity and type of material to be excavated, dredged or UMld to fill or riprop; location of dispoHlI sites; type of structure to be installed; height of dam; sin of impoundment; capocities of propoMld water sources; extent of distribution system; sin of marina and types of docks and moorings to be installed; etc.1 Remove 5 ± CY of stone over an area of 300 ± SF from a docking area and dispose of, underwater, 16.WllL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FEDERAL, STATE AND/OR LOCAL PERMITSl aVes 0 No If VES, please list:' Town of Southald. US Annv Corps I hereby aKirm that informalion proyided on this form ond all onachments submined herewilh is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. False statements made herein are punishable as a Class A misdemeanor pursuant to Section 210.45 of the Penal law. Further, the applicant accepts full responsibility for 011 damage, direct or indirect, of whatever nature, and by whomever suKered, arising out of the project described herein and agrees to indemnify and save honnless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and desuiption resulting from Hlid project. In addition, Federal law, 18 U.S.C., Section 1001 proyides for 0 fine of not more than S 1 0,000 or imprisonment for not more than five yeaR, or both, where an applicant knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or coyen up ci material foct; or knowingly makes or UMlS a false, fictitious or fraudulent statement. Dire authorir.e the ogent named in Num it fhi on my behalf. Dal. S"J'I t, " 'ignatuI. al Own.' Titl. 0 "'/1\/ ~: . Dal. ';.na'u~ al "".nt/Can'act P.~n "'-- Titl. þ&s;;cf",,-r. ~C~ I k) ~¡;:p-- - -- --- ---~- . . , Docko, Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (B60) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net May 21, 2001 Mr. Steve Resler NYS DOS 41 State Street, 8th Floor Albany, NY 12231 Re: Richard Bingham, Fishers Island Stone Removal Dear Mr. Resler: On behalf of our client, we submit the attached Federal Consistency Assessment Form for stone removal on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: ':. Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: "Stone Removal" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham April 30, 2001 Applicant: Date: .:. Two copies of Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold Application forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map and NYS DOS Coastal Management Federal Consistency Assessment Forms. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable: please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, D,9CI)9,!N~ Ifdtf:' 1étU;j)~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Mr. Richard Bingham NYS DEC: Regulatory Affairs Town of South old: Krupski File: 96-06-705 BINGHAM \. . . NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistencv Assessment Fonn An applicant, seeking a penn it, license, waiver, certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York Stale Coastal Management Program (CMP), shall complete this assessm....t funn for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This fonn is intended to assist an applicant in certifÿing that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regularions (15 CFR 930.57). It should be completed at the time when the federal applicarion is prepared. The Departtn....t of State will use the completed fonn and accompanying infonnation in its review of the applicanrs certification of consistency. A. APPLICANT (please print) I. Name: Richard Bin.ham 2. Address: I Maritime Place. Suite 2525. San Francisco. CA 94111 3. Telephone: Area Code ( ) Docko. Inc. (860) 572-8939 B. PROPOSED ACflVITY I. Brief description of activity: Remove 51+/-) CY of stone over an area ofJOO 1+/-) SF from a dockin. area and dispose of. underwater. 2. Purpose of activity: This Droiect is to Drovide safe access for recreation boatin2 for the Bimmam familv. 3. Location of activity: Suffolk County County Town of Southold. Fishers Island City, Town, orVillage Central Avenue Street or Site Description 4. Type offederal pennitllicense required: 5. Federal application number, ifknown: Not vet known / not aDDlicable 6. If a state pennitllicense was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identity the state agency and provide the application or penni! number, if known: NYS DEC Relnllatorv Affairs . . C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YES" or "NO" for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity. I. Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: liS !ill a. Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11,22,25,32,37,38,41,43) .......................................... _ ...x b. Physical alteration of more than two acres ofland along the shoreline, land under water or coastal waters? (2, II, 12,20,28,35,44) ................................................................ _ ...x c. Revitalization/redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfÌ'ont site? (I) ....................... _ ..x d. Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (t9, 20)...................... _ ...x e. Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10) .............. _ ..x f. Siting of a fucility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelfl (29)................................................. _ ...x g. Siting of a fucility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27) ................................. _ ...x h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (IS, 35)...................................................................................................................... _ ...x i. Discharge oftoxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15,35)....... _ ..x j. Draining ofstonnwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33)................................... _ ...x k. Transpon, storage, treatment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39) ........... _ ...x I. Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4) .................................. _ ...x 2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: YES !ill a. State designated fTeshwater or tidal wetland? (44) ............................................................................... 11': _ b. Federally designated flood andlor state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17,) .................... -X _ c. State designated significant fish andlor wildlife habitat? (7) ............................................................. _ ..x d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)................................................................. _ --X e. State designated important agricultural lands? (26)........................................................................... _ --X f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12)..................................................................................................... _ -X g. Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3)....................................... _ ...x h. State, county, or local park? (19, 20) .................................................................................................. _ ...x i. Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23).......................... _ -X 3. Will the proposed activity ~ any of the following: YES !ill a. WaterfÌ'ont site? (2, 21, 22) .................................................................................................................. lL_ b. Provision of new public services or infTastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5)........................................................................................................... _ ...x c. Construction or reconstruction ofa flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16)......................... _ ...x d. State water quality penn it or certification? (30,38,40)..................................................................... X e. State air quality pennit or certification? (41, 43)................................................................................ _ ...x 4. Will the proposed activity occur within andlor affect an area covered by a State approved local waterfÌ'ont revitalization program? (see policies in local program document) ......................................... _ ...x ",", . . D. ADDITIONAL STEPS I. lfall of the questions in Section C are answered "NO", then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. 2. Ifany of the questions in Section C are answered ''YES'', then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP, or where appropriate, the local waterfÌ'ont revitalization program document'. The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s), the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify, by their policy numbers, which coastal policies are affected by the activity, (b) briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and, (c) state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment, the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E. CERTIFICA nON The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfÌ'ont revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made, complete this Section. "The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program. and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program." Applicant!Agenrs Name: Docko. Inc. Keith B. Neilson. P.E Address: PO Box 421. Mvstic. cr 06355 Applicant! Agent's Signature: 5~æJ14ì~~ Telephone: Area Code (860) Date: S//}..I/ öI F. SUBMISSION REOUIREMENTS I. The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources, 41 State Street - 8th Floor, Albany, New York 12231. a. Copy of original signed fonn. b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2. The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with hislher application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this fonn, contact the Department of State at (518) 474- 6000. . . 'These state and local documents an: availahle for inspectioo at the offices of many federal agencies, Department of environmental ConseIVation and Department of State regional offices, and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. Local program documents are also available for inspection at the omces of the appropriate local government D:\Wcb'<stllftafl.wpÎ! (revised IOItS/99) · . NYS DOS Environmental Questionnaire Richard Bingham Fishers Island, NY May 10,2001 Permit Attachment GENERAL: This project is for the removal and relocation of stone at the south end of the berthing slips for recreational boating. The stones are at a depth of 2' to 3' and constitute obstructions and potential sources of damage to the propeller and hull of the boat at low tide, especially in wavy conditions. It is anticipated that removal of5 (+/-) CY of stone nom an area of300 (+/-) SF and relocate the stone approximately 10 to 20 feet south in shallower subtidal waters. The stones are generally 1 to 2 cubit feet in size. In effect, this will merely be the relocation of existing bottom habitat. The names and addresses of adjacent property owners are listed on the application drawings. Photographs of the project site are included herein. In addition, we have enclosed copies of the Town of Southold, Board of Trustees, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit Applications which provide all of the environmental impact assessment statements that have been prepared for this project. There are no shorenont stabilization or erosion control measures proposed for this project. The existing shorenont consists of a rocky sandy shorenont with a steep sloping and eroding coastal bluff. The bluff has been protected with armor stone and boulders which naturally occur at this site or may have been added. The history of this protection is not known. COASTAL ASSESSMENT- 2a. State designated neshwater or tidal wetlands? (44) In accordance with the defmition of tidal wetlands extending down to a depth of approximately -6 feet at mean low water, this site and the scope of the project falls within this jurisdiction. The existing bottom habitat is sandy gravel with scattered boulders and large stones such as the ones to be relocated. This is a shallow subtidal area exposed to tremendous wave energy and seasonally, rock weed grows on many of the boulders and large stone. Much of this rock weed is decimated in stonns but has a tendency to re-grow on the rocks. It is anticipated that this feature will remain with these stones even after their relocation. 2b. Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? (11,12,17) This part of Fishers Island is exposed to direct wave attack nom northeasterly wind- induced waves. It is by all terms of the definition, a coastal erosion hazard area. 3a. Waternont site? (2,21,22) This project is to be conducted on a waternont site. The dock and berthing facilities span nom the shore through the intertidal zone to the shallow subtidal zone to provide adequate berthing facilities for the owner's recreational boating needs. . 3d. State water quality permit or certification? (30, 38, 40) . It is our belief that this project requires a state water quality permit or certification because it constitutes excavation of bottom sediments under the strictest definitions of the project. In effect, the work will have virtually no impact on water flow, circulation, sediment transport or tidal flushing in this area. There will be no increased turbidity or degradation of water quality as a result of the work except for minor disturbances during the actual construction process. This'process should take only one or two days at the most. Because of the site's open exposure, work will have to be done during periods of high tide and low wave to calm conditions in Fishers Island Sound. Based on these construction restraints, it is anticipated that there will be no increase in sedimentation which would adversely affect water quality of the region. Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice· President. Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda . . ~ (] Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~etland Permit Application ~ajor W aiver/ Amendment/Changes ...-Received Application:~~1:II ....Received Fee:$ .:JnO ~ .....cómpleted Application ~Î~~f'j _Incomplete _SEQRA Classification: Type I_Type II_Unlisted_ _Coordination: (date sent) LCAC Referral sent~tj ,/Date of Inspection: 3 C I Receipt ofCAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ....-Public Hearing Held:~UO' Resolution: Minor MI\) 25." Name of Applicant Richard Bingham Address 1 Maritime Place. Suite 2525. San Francisco. CA 94111 Phone Number:( ) (415) 788-7354 Suffolk County Tax ¥ap Number: 1000 - h-4-/ r'ol'~ >;}... Property Locat1ön:: S~e is located on Fishers Island Sound iust west of the West Harbor on the north shore of Hawk's Nest Point, ~ (\Yd- ,:> \\.~ ,~ \\)\. (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Keith B. Neilson. P.E.. DoC'..ko, Tnc (If applicable) Address: P.O, Box 421. Mvstic. CT 06355 Phone: (1'\60) 572 6939 . . . . Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (i~ square feet): Area Zoning: Previous use of property: Intended use of property: Prior permits/approvals for site improvements: Agency Thwn nf ~nrh~lð. #4G~4 Date January 30, 1997 NYS DEC, #1-4738-01599/00001 July 31, 1 <¡en US AOOE, 97-04960 October 2, 1997 _ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has any permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? ~No_ Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary): Reomove 5 ± CY of stone over an area of 300 ± SF fran a dockinq area and dispose of, underwater , · . Board of Trustees Application WETLANDrrRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: To provide safe access for rp~rp~~inn~l bo~g_ Area of wetlands on lot: 3 0 0 SF square feet Percent coverage oflot: Less than1 % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 40 + feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: N/A feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? No x Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? 5 ± cubic yards How much material will be filled? N / A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: o fuet Boulders on the surface Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: Gently sloping - 10% Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: A clamshell bucket will be used or else the stones will be removed / relocated by land (diver). Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): There is no foreseab1e impact on the wetlands or quality of the benthic habitat as a result of this work. stones will merely be relocated from one. 20 feet to ~nothpr. . . Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICA TlON DATA N/A Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? (cubic yards) How much material will be filled? ( cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation of the project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) . . NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Richard Bingham SCTM#1000- 6-4-2 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: Remove 5 ± CY of stone over an area of 300 ± SF from a docking area and dispose of, underwater. 2. That the property which is the subject of Environmental Review-is located adjacent to your property and is described as follows: Central Avenue 3. That the project which is subject to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on: You may contact the Trustees Office at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Richard Bingham MAILING ADDRESS: 1 Maritimp Pl~rp, Suite 2525 R~n Fr~n~i~~n rà 94111 PHONE #~415) 7å8-7154 Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. s -< " . . 14·16-04 (12/87}-<1, ¡-ROJECT ID NÚMBER 817.20 APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUTY REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I-PROJECT INFORMATION (To be complBted by Applicant or Project Sponsor) SEQR 1. APPUCANT/SPONSQR 2. PROJECT NAME Richard Binaham Stone Remov;¡l 3. PROJECT LOCATION: FÜ¡þeµ:;~ ",!sland, TOwn of Southold Counlv Suffolk umcl all 4. PRECISE LOCATION: (SUM. add,.., and f'OIId inter..clions, prominent landmarks, lie., or provide map) Site is located on Fishers Island Sound just west of the West Harbor on· the north shore of Hawk's Point. 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: l'if New o Exøansion o Moditication/alleralion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLV: Remove 5± CY of stone over an area of 300 ± SF from a docking area and dispose of, underwater. 7. AMOUNT OF LANO AFFECTEO: Less than 25 SF Initially Be,.. Uttlmataly acr.. 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? 0( V.. o No " no, d.scrlbe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? IK R..idantia' C Indultn-I C Commercial [J Agriçuhu,. [J Park/ForeltlOpen SPKa. o Other Oeacribe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL. OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal. State or L<>cal)? 0:: Yes o No If yes, list agency,s) and pennit/approvall Town of Southold, US Anny Corps of Engineers 11. DOES ANV ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? DYe. Jõ No " yes. list agency name and pennltlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? o Ves o No , I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ~. .- n' - ~Sl. 5/ ' 'ð/ 01 APPllcanusponz ~D /~ /./ Signature , X " If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER \. . . . I A. DOES ACTION EXCeED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR PART 617.41 o V.. 0 No It yes. coordinate the review proce,1 and us. the FUll. EAF. B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REV1EW AS PROVIDED FOR UNUSTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR PART 617.61 o Yes 0 No It no. a neaativ. declaration may be superseded by another involved aaenev. e COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOllOWING: (Answers may be handwritten, " legible' C 1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater Quality or Quantity, noi.. levels, exllting traffic patteml, lolld wute production or dilpoul; potential tor .rolion, drainage or floodi"g problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic, agricultural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cutturaf re.ourc..: or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A communlty'1 exilting plana or goals as officially adopted. or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Expla!n briefly: C5. Growth, subsequent development, ¡;r related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain brieny: C6. Long term, ahort term, cumulative. or other enecta not Identified In C1-C5? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts (including changes In use of e"her quantity or type of energy)? explain briefty: D. WIll. THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABUSHMENT OF A CEA? DYes o No E. IS THERE, OR IS THERE UKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? o Yea o No If yes, explain briefly PART II-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be cDmpleted by Agency) PART II-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be cDmpleted by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adv..... effect Id.ntlfied above. detennIM whether It ta aubltantial. ~roe. Imponant or otherwise signUicant. Each enect should be ..,ell.d In connection wtth Ita (a) letting (I.... urban or ruraI); (b) probabtlity of occurring; Ie) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e) geographic ICOpe; . and (I) magnitude. If n.ceIUry. add attachments or relerence supporting materiall. Enlure that explanations contain lufficlent detail to Ihow that all relevant adverse Impactl have been Identified and adequatety addre..ed. If QU.ltion D of Part II was check.d yel. the determination and sig- nilicanc. must .valuate the potenliallmpact of the proposed acIìon on the .nvironmental charac:tertslics 01 the CEA. o Check this box If you have identified one or mDre potentially large and significant adverse Impacts which may occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. o Check this box if YDU have determined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result In any significant adverse envlrDnmental impacts AND provide on anachments as necessary. the reasons supporting this determination: Name of Lead Agency Pnnl or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Tltl. 01 Responsible Officer Signature of ResponsIble Officer in Lead Agency Signature 01 Prepar.r (If differenl from responsible officer) Date . . Board of Trustees Application County of StI.!fvl!,.. SÄIh frMleì s (..V State ofN,,~ ':8rk ~I ,ftH"(1¡' 0\.. Rir.hrlrn Ringhrlm BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVES(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. 4.~. Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS I 8+~ DAY OF Mo.,! ,20QL ¿~~oLk~ Notary Public Je----==æil f Nc*I1f\jc..DAb.iI !œt~=QøIJt - t___~~~1 a+ of Trustees APplication. AUTHORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) ... I, Richard Binaham (print owner of property) residing at Fishers Island NV 06390 (mailing address) do hereby authorize Docko. Inc. (Agent) P.O. Box 421. MVRticr ~T Ofi1SS to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. 4~~~ ,. 8 . . . Docko. Inc. "" p.o. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net "'" May21,2001 Mr. Albert Krupski, President Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ti~y 2 5 Re: Richard Bing&am Stone Removal Dear Mr. Krupski: On behalf of Mr. Richard Bingham, we enclose herewith the following in support of his permit application for stone removal at his property on Fishers Island. .:. Two prints each of plans titled: Applicant: Date: "Stone Removal" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of So uthold Suffolk County. New York Richard Bingham April 30, 2001 Project: Waterway: Location: .:. Two copies of the Southold Board of Trustees permit application., U.S. ACOE and DEC applications, Tax Assessor's Map, site photographs and location map. .:. Check in the amount of$200 payable to the Town of South old I trust that you will fmd this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know ifthe need for further information arises. Very truly yours. DOCKO, INC. WMM~ , Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Mr. Richard Bingham ACOE: Mr. Jim Haggerty NYS DEC: Regulatory Affairs File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM . . . " LOC..AT/ON r-7..AP I ::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: 1=1 '000 0 NOTES: "I 1 I", " " " CI) f5 ~ t 1 1000 REFEf'ENCE CH.ART: 12372 GRÞPHC 5C.AI.E N YARDS 1. ELEVATlON D.ATlJM IS MEAN LOW WATER Q ~ ::> o CI) Q ~ J mIll .... FISHER'S ISLAND ~ ~ ~ H-AoVVK'S NEST POINT EXISTING PIER ~ ~ ~ I . 2. TIDE DATA IS tAKEN FI<OM 2002 NOAA TlDE TABLES I<EFERENCE . NEW LONDON AND SILVER EEL. COVE. RSHERSISLAND. PR:O..JEC" PIER: EXTENSION 3 P1<OJEcr DESCRIPTlON' CONSTRUCT 40 >LF OF 6-FT \\i1DE FD<ED WOOD RLE AND TlMBER RER INCWDING 3 BR"CED TlE-QFF PIUNGS AND A SHIPS LÞODDER W.ATERWARD OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. A.. P1<OJECT PURPOSE THIS IS A PRIVATE DOCK FOR RECREATlONAL 8OATlNG. 5. THESE APPUCATlON DRA\\i1NGS REPRESENT A COMPILATlON OF SUR\,EYS FOR PERMIT PURPOSES. THEY .ARE NOT CONSTRUcrK:JN CON=r DOCUMENTS. ~ ~ ~ 6. ADJOINING P1<OPERTY OWNERS: E-'6T: MA'<Y MURPHY 1 EAST 66TH STREET NEW YORK CrTY. NY 10021 WEST: TOW N OF SOUTHOLD 53095 MAJN ROAD, P.Q. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD NY. 11791 REVISED 10-12 02 ACOE PIER lENGTH ANO NOTES REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER lENGTH AND NOTES REVISED 12-12-02 RB NOTES ; I =., .:,r-';, 11'1'- I [I ¡ - Ill' I l~' ~ ,~, ~ ~ ~ E ND~~ ~8 .. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~9.:~ r MUNNATAWKET AVENUE OVERALL PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 1 ~ = 100' I 100 50 o I 100 PROJECT: LOCATION: WAlERWAY: DAlE: APPUCAHT: PIER EXTENSION FISHERS ISlAND, TOWN OF SOUlHOLD SUFFOU< COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISlAND SOUND SEP'TENBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 2 DOCKO, INC. Ke.lth B. Nllilaan, PE KyR1a, CT D8365 Bilo 672-8989 . NEW BRACED SUPPORT PILE (7YP) NEW TIE-OFF ~PILE EL 18'± AHWL EL 3.4 I I I MHW EL 2.3 ALWL EL 0.0- NEW FIXED PIER EXTENSION EL 5 '± EXISTING TIE -OFF PILE EL 18' ± (1YP) ISTING FIXED PIER RAILS TO BE AODED DECK EL 12.0 -~, . ..- .. ·.NEW . LADDER NOTE: EEL GRASS BED APPEARS TO START APPROXIMATELY 50' OR MORE NORTH OF THE EXISTING PIER PROFILE EXISTING BAITER BRACED SUPPORT PILE (1YP) I ~HWL.Jl.3~ I ~HW EL2.~ DEe\< L 5± GRAPHIC SCALE 1· _ 20' <1> 1\LWLEL ..Q,Q BA TTERE PILE FISHERS ISLAND SOUND NEW HIP'S LADDER ~mm NEW PIER END DETAIL NOT TO SCALE O---BOULDER TIE-OFF PILE (TYP) il il il II il il ex (7YP) 00 °0 EEL GRASS ( -2.6 )( -2.2 NEW SUPPORT PILE (7YP) M -4.7 x ~ ~ ~ <C r ~ :x: '" SPARTlNA I ~ ~ :x: <C COASTAL BLUFF PLAN VIEW ROCKY SHOREFRONT STREWN WITH BOULDERS I 20 GRAPHIC SCALE,' 20' o I 20 PROJECT: PIER EXTENSION REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH REVISED 12-10-02 RB SHIP'S lADDER lOCATION: WATERWAY: DAlE: APPUCANT: FISHERS ISlAND, TOWN OF SOUlHOLD SUFFOU< COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISIANO SOUND SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEEr 20F 2 DOCKO. INC. KeIth B. Ne1Iaon, PI!: 1IyøtJc, CT 011966 880 1172-811811 >,." r I." - T, -, ' - , I -1,- ~" ¡, Ir,-, L' ~ 'r.: 1"1 J - 8 ú. ,-, .~ ~¡, ',,~ .' _J , ", ~ ....- .~ "I " 2' 1 '2 Q FISHER'S ISLAND I", " ~ ~ ~ ., ., .) ~ 0 H.P-.\A/K·S NEST P=,NT " f/) ., " Q ~ J mIll .... f/) f5 ~ ~ ~ t ~ LOC~TION (--LAP I'EFEI>ENCE ~: 123'72 11==11==11==11==11==1 I GRAA--liC 5GALE 1000 0 1000 N YAADS NOTES, ~ ~ ~ EXIS:TING. PIE~~~__ PR=~~:::r' PIER E><.TENSI=N I 1 ELEVATION DATUM 15 MEAN LOW WATER 2. TlDE DATA IS TA<:EN R<OM 2002 NOAA TlDE TABLES REÆRENCE , NEW LONDON,AND SILVER EEL COVE. RSHERS ISLAND. 3. PROJECT DESCRJPTlON CONSTRUCT 40 .LF OF 6-FT WIDE FIXED WOOD RLE ,AND TlMBER RER INCWDING 3 BRPCED llE-DFF PILlNGS,AND A SHIPS LADDER W.ATERl.VARD OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. 4. PROJECT PURPOSE, THIS IS A PRIV ATE DOCK FOR RECREA TlON.o'L BOAllNG 5. THESE ADR...ICA1l0N DRAWINGS REPRESENT A COMRLAllON OF SURVEYS FOR PERMIT PURPOSES. THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUcnON CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 6. ,ADJOINING PROPERTY ov"NERS, EAST, MA'<Y MURPHY 1 EAST 66lr15TREET NE\V YORK CITY. NY 10021 \\IE5T Tov"N OF 5OUTHOLD 53095 MAIN ROAD, P.Q. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD NY, 11791 , .:'\:;~·,:I~:~:~~'~ '. ,-', ' '_I 'Í-"\:-:.. " ..-~\-;--)-'\ .... ,,'.:':h \.V.' , ';"- . ~"'~":;'~: " ¡ - . ., "I! . . ~ .,j' ' , ¡ '\{.J1- .. . .<~:.:- q ~ 1'1- E NO~~ ~s .. ~ ~ ~ TOWN OF SOUTH OLD ¡;""'.:'13 r MUNNATAWKET AVENUE OVERALL PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 1 DO' I 100 50 o I 100 REVISED 10-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH AND NOTES REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH AND NOTES REVISED 12-12-02 RB NOTES PROJECT: lOCATION: WATERWAY: DATE: APPUCANT: PIER EXTENSION FISHERS ISlAND, TOWN OF SOUlHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISlAND SOUND SEPtEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEEr 1 OF 2 DOCKO. INC. Kalth B. Nei!IIon, PE 1IIt",uo. CT 08355 880 572-8999 I ! co -. :,1·'1<11 ,,~ "1,-11 - filii l i,. ' ·'J ,.. NEW BRACED SUPPORT PILE (TYP) NEW TIE-OFF ~PILE EL 18'± AHWL EL 3.4 I I MHW EL 2.3 ALWL EL 0.0 NEW FIXED PIER EXTENSION EL 5 '± EXISTING DECK EL 5'± EXISTING TIE -OFF PILE EL 18'± (1YP) ISTING FlXED PIER RAILS TO BE AODED OECK EL 12.0 '" ... . ~. :.:.~ ':-.:~:~' NOTE: EEL GRASS BED APPEARS TO START APPROXIMATELY 50' OR MORE NORTH OF THE EXISTING PIER EXISTING BATTER BRACED SUPPORT PILE (1YP) ) AHWL EL 3.4 PROFILE - -..--- J,4HW EL~.~ 20' DEC¡< L 5 ± GRAPHIC SCALE 1- '" .Þ.LWLEL ..Q.Q BATlERE PILE FISHERS ISLAND SOUND NEW U!!JC& 11 11 11 11 M 11 ~rum NEW PIER END DETAIL / o-BDULOER '-EXISTING EXISTING TIE -OFF PILE DECK EL 5' ± (1YP) NOT TO SCALE o 11 11 n ~ Jc 00 ~. ~ °25 '. (TYP) :IC -2.6 x -2.2 NEW SUPPORT PILE (TYP) SPARTINA I ~ ~ I « COASTAL BLUFF 11 -4.7 )( ~ ~ ~ « I 20 GRAPHIC SCAlE ,. - 20' ROCKY SHOREFRONT STREWN WITH 80ULDERS PLAN VIEW o I 20 PROJECT: PIER EXTENSION REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH REVISED 12-10-02 RB SHIP'S lADDER LOCATION: WATERWAY: DATE: APPUCANT: FlSHERS ISlAND, TOWN Of SOIITHOLD SUFFOLK COUNtY, NEW YORK FlSHERS ISlAND SOUND SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 2 Of 2 DOCKO. INC. Keith B. If_n, PE KJBtIc, CT 1N1966 880 11'12-811311 '" "-'- ': ,- "..','11.,',.[, "-,, :111" 'f I-'~' " Part 2-PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project. on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, cc;>nsider long term, short term and cumlative effects Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 20 questions In PART 2. Answer Yes If there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Idenilfylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it Is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large Impact checked In column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A No response Indicates that such a reduction Is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? . DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. o Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. o Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. o Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. o Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (Le., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. o Construction in a designated floodway. o Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site! (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.DNO DYES o Specific land forms: 6 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 Does proposed action involve a planning or oning decision? DYes DNa If Yes, indicate decision required: Owning amendment Owning vari nce Dspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dnew/revision of master plan Ores urce management plan Dother 2. What is the zoning classification(sjof the ite? 3. What is the maximum potential develoPIT nt of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 25. Approvals RCQuired: City. Town, Vdlage Board City. Town. Village Planning Board City. Town Zoning Board City. County Health Department Other local Agencies Other Regional Agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies Type Submittal Date DYes DNa DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes 01'/0 DYes 01'10 I DYes r}No DYes pNO DYes 101'10 I ----- Dsite plan 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site 5. What is the maximum potential develo¡ TIent of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with 7. What are the predominant land use(s) he recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 01'10 DYes nd zoning classifications within a 1;4 mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible ith adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1h mile? DYes 01'10 9. If the proposed action is the subdiv sio n of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot ze proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any a tho rization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes 01'10 11. Will the proposed action create de mand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police. fire protection)? DYes D~o a. If yes, is existing capacity suffi cient to handle projected demand! DYes 01'10 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? DYes 01'10 a. I f yes, is the existing road netw ork adequate to handle the additional traffic? DYes 01'10 D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Date Signature Title If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding wllh thl. assessment. 5 p . . , . IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? DNO DVES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. . · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? DNa DVES Eumples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 oVes oNo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 DYes DNo 0 0 OVes DNo 0 0 DVes DNo 0 0 OVes DNo 0 0 OVes DNo 0 0 OVes DNo 0 0 OVes ONo 0 0 OVes ONo · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. o Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 Ibs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. o Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. o Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal lis!, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. o Removal of any portion of a critical or significant \!'ildlife habitat. · Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. o Other Impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. o Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? DNa DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o The proposed action would sever. cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes ONo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo . 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo 0 0 DYes oNo - .. . · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. e The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District. more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines. outlet ditches. strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources! DNO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance! DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 o Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. o Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. o Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities! Examples that would apply to column 2 DNO DYES o The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. o A major reduction of an open space important to the community. o Other impacts: 9 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact E Moderate Large Mitigated B\ Impact Impact Project Chan¡ 0 0 DYes ON 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, 0 0 DYes ON, I IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14 Will Proposed Action Impact the exceptional or unique chard-ClCf ¡sties of a critical environmental area ((EA) estabhshed pursuant to subdivISIon 6 NYCRR 61714(g) I DNO DYES List the environmental characteristICs that caused the designatIon uf the CE A Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action to locate within the (EA? · Proposed Action will result In a reduction In the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource1 · Proposed Action will Impact the use, function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systemsl . DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supplyl DNO DnS Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in thé use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than SO single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. · Other impacts: 10 1 2 3 Small 10 Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNa D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D [j DYes DNo . NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors. noise. or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital. school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will OCcur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. · Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. · Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. · Other impactS: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAÇTER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community! DNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city. town or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future ·projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other Impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNO D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo D D DYes DNo 20. Is there. or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts! DNO DYES II Inr le\lon In Plrt 2 10 identified II a pollntlllllrge Implct or II rou ClMot determine the mlgnltude ollmplct, pt'OcHd 10 Plrt 3 11 Part 3-EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to mooerate impact by project change(s) 3.' Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its irreversibility. including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) 12 #' 14-14-11 (9195)-9c 617.20 Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum SEQR This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) I. Would the project be visible from: Q·V. 1/4-112 ';'·3 3·5 5+ · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and avaiiable 0 0 0 0 0 to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public 0 0 0 0 0 observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? · A site or structure listed on the National or State 0 0 0 0 0 Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? 0 0 0 0 0 · The State Forest Preserve? 0 0 0 0 0 · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? 0 0 0 0 0 · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding 0 0 0 0 0 natural features? · National Park Service lands? 0 0 0 0 0 · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic 0 0 0 0 0 or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such 0 0 0 0 0 as part of the Interstate System, or .Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated interstate 0 0 0 0 0 or Inter·county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as 0 0 0 0 0 scenic? · Municipal park, or designated open space? 0 0 0 0 0 · County road? 0 0 0 0 0 · State? 0 0 0 0 0 · Local road? 0 0 0 0 0 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (Le., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) DYes oNo 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? DYes oNo 1 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the ~urrounding environment. Within $1/", mile .. 1 mile Essentially undeveloped Forested Agricultural Suburban residential Industrial Commercial Urban River, Lake, Pond Cliffs, Overlooks Designated Open Space Flat Hilly Mountainous Other NoIE: add attachments as needed o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 5. Are there visually similar projects within: °Y2 mile DYes DNo °1 miles DYes DNo °2 miles DYes ONo °3 miles DYes ONo ° Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or actIvity In whIch the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved In recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At workslte Other Dally o o o o o o Weekly o o o o o o FREQUENCY Holidays! Weekends o o o o o o Seasonally o o o o o o 2 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Artie .Foster Ken Poliwoda Peggy A. Dickerson Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Janauary 10, 2003 Re: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2. Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3. Issues of concern that you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: Richard Bingham Requested Action: Extend an existing 6' wide fixed, wood pile and timber pier 40' +/-, into waters of LI Sound. All work is waterward of the Mean high and high tide lines. The extension includes installation of new tie-off piles, ladders and a ship's ladder. SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I (X ) Unlisted Contact Person: Albert J. Krupski. Jr., President (631) 765-1892 Page 2 Lead Agency Coordination Request The lead agency will determine the need for an environmental impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether or not you have an interest in being lead agency. If no response is received from you, it will be assumed that there is no objection to the Board of Trustees assuming lead agency status. Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. Very truly yours, ;_J (J ~__'>~ C I' ,( ¡ r Albert Krupski, Jr. President cc: Army Corp. of Engineers Dept. of State DEC ('Maps are enclosed for your review) 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 9 acre Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine. in an orderly manner. whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequently. there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition. many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly. comprehensive in nature. yet nexible enough to allow introduchon of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or achon. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large. then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ~ Part 1 D Part 2 D Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate). and any other supporting information. and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact. it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: DA The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and. therefore. is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. DB Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment. there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required. therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared. . DC The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment. therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. - A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions RICHARD BINGHAM- PIER EXTENSION Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer) website Date Page 1 of 21 PART '--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. Name of Action PIER EXTENSION Location of Action (include Street Address. Municipality and County) CENTRAL A VENUE, FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY Name of Applicant/Sponsor RICHARD BINGHAM Address CENTRAL AVENUE City I PO FISHERS ISLAND State NY Zip Code 06390 Business Telephone (415) 788-7354 Name of Owner (if different) Address City I PO State Zip Code Business Telephone Description of Action: EXTEND AN EXISTING 6-FOOT WIDE FIXED, WOOD PILE AND TIMBER PIER 40 FEET MORE OR LESS, INTO WATERS OF LONG ISLAND SOUND. ALL WORK IS WATER WARD OF THE MEAN HIGH AND HIGH TIDE LINES. THE EXTENSION INCLUDES INSTALLATION OF NEW TIE-OFF PILES, LADDERS AND A SHIP'S LADDER. Page 2 0121 Pleas~ Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. SITE DESCRIPTION Physical setting of overall project. both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 . Present Land Use: 0 Urban o Forest o Industrial o Agriculture o Commercial o Other o Residential (suburban) o Rural (non-farm) 2. Total acreage of project area: 0.1 acres. Water Surface Area PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres acres acres acres acres o. ( acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards. cropland. pasture. etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24.25 of ECL) Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: DWell drained _% of site 0 Moderately well drained _% of site. Dpoorly drained _ % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved. how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? acres (see 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? 0 Yes [!] No a. What is depth to bedrock (in feet) 5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 00.10%_% 010-15%_% E}15%orgreaterJ.QÇL% 6. Is project substantia~ontiguous to, or contain a building. site, or district. listed on the State or National Registers of Historic Places? U Yes [!] No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? DYes 0NO B. What is the depth of the water table? o (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal. or sole source aquifer? DYes [!] No [!] Yes 0 No 10. Do hunting. fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Page 3 of 21 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? DYes [!NO îcCOrding to: i-'- 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs. dunes. other geological formations? [!]Yes DNo Describe: I >"~,, ""~ WUN" 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? [! Yes DNo If yes, explain: IOOA<rnG 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I VIEW OF FfSHERS ISLAND SOUND 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: I NONE a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I ~Yes DNO 16. Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: b. Size (in acres): I Page 4 of 21 17, Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~Yes DNo ~Yes DNo DYes ~NO a. If YES. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? b. If YES. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets law. Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304? DYes [!:I No 19. Is the site located in or substantial!:L£.0ntiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECl. and 6 NYCRR 6177 [!:I Yes UNo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? Dyes [!:I No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate). a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: 2 (+1-) acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 0.1 acres initially; 0.1 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 0.8 acres. d. length of project. in miles: 0.01 (if appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion. indicate percent of expansion proposed. 40 % f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing 2-3 ; proposed same g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour: o (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure: 5' height; 6' width; 40' length. j. linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? NIA ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc,) will be removed from the site? None tons/cubic yards. 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed DYes ~NO DNIA a. If yes. for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes ~ No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? 0 Yes ~ No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? none acres. Page 5 of 21 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? Dves 0NO 6. If single phase prqject: Anticipated period of construction: ----1... months. (including demolition) 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated _ (number) b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1: _ month _ year. (including demolition) c. Approximate completion date of final phase: _ month _ year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases7 D Ves D No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? D Ves 0 No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 3 ; after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project none 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? D Ves 0 No If yes. explain: 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? D Ves 0 No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial. etc) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? D Ves 0 No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? 0ves DNO If yes. explain: THE PIER EXTENSION WILL OCCUPY 240 SF (+/-) UPON COMPLETION. 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? 0 Ves DNO 16. Will the project generate solid waste? D Ves 0 No a. If yes. what is the amount per month? tons b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? DYes D No c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? DYes DNo Page 6 of 21 e. If yes. explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? DYes [!]NO a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use he;bicides or pesticides? DYes [!] No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? DYes [!]NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? DYes [!]NO 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? DYes [!] No If yes. indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells. indicate pumping capacity N/A gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day N/ A gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local. State or Federal funding? DYes [!] No If yes. explain: Page 7 of 21 25. Approvals Required: City. Town, Village Board [!]Yes City. Town, Village Planning Board 0 Yes City. Town Zoning Board 0 Yes City. County Health Department 0 Yes Other Local Agencies 0 Yes Other Regional Agencies 0 Yes State Agencies [!] Yes Federal Agencies [!]Yes DNo ONO ONO ONO o No ONO o No ONO Type Southold, Board of Trustees NYS DEC-Wetlands Permit US Army Corps of C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? DYes 0 No If Yes, indicate decision required: o Zoning amendment 0 Zoning variance o Site plan 0 Special use permit Page 8 of 21 D New/revision of master plan D Resource management plan Submittal Date 91l9/02 91l9/02 9/19/02 D Subdivision o Other 2. What is the zoning classification(s) of the site? I RESIDENTIAL 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? """'m'" 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? I RESIDENTIAL 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? I NOT APPLICABLE 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? [!]ves DNo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '!4 mile radius of proposed action? ALL RESIDENTIAL 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses with a ¥4 mile? 0ves DNO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? NIA a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? NI A Page 9 of 21 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes [!] No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation. education, police. fire protection? DYes [!] No a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? DYes DNo a. If yes. is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic. DYes DYes [!] No DNo 1 2. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal. please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. VerifICation I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. ApplicantlSponsor Name Docko,Inc., Keith B. Neilson, PE Date 12/02/02 Signature td~ Title President, Agent for Richard Bingham If the action is in the Coastal Area. and you are a state agency. complete the Coastal Assessment Fonn before proceeding with this assessment. Page 10 of 21 . . ., DockoJ Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net December 12,2002 Ms Charlotte Cunningham Southold Board of Trustees P.O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 ')I'.('~· nçr, \ ~ c ,'- Re: Richard Bingham Property Fishers Island Dear Ms Cunningham: In accordance with my conversation with Ms Carol Farkas of the NYS DEC we have reviewed the project with Mr. Bingham and he is in agreement with pursuing the longer extension if it's absolutely necessary for environmental reasons. He did have one additional reques1 however and that was to add a new ship's ladder off the west edge of the pier in the first bent beyond the transition to the level pier section at the end. Accordingly, we have modified the drawings and made appropriate notes regarding the revision and submit it herewith for your review. Because of the incidental nature of this modification, I don't believe a change to the application documents is required. It would be greatly appreciated if you could just review this briefly and let me know how is the best way to proceed at this point so that Mr. Bingham can obtain his pennit and build this extension for upcoming boating season. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. í;i?øJ~~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm CC: Richard Bingham File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM . . SEQRA RESOLUTION RE: RICHARD BINGHAM SCTM#6-4-2 Resolved by the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold that the application of RICHARD BINGHAM more fully described in the public hearing section #21 of the Trustee agenda dated Wednesday, December 18, 2002 is, pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations, an Unlisted Action; and be it Further resolved that the applicant is required to submit Part 1 of the Long Environmental Assessment Form (LEAF); and be it Further resolved that upon receipt of the LEAF the Clerk of the Trustees is hereby directed to commence a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA. ~ ~ . Docko. Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net November 13, 2002 Mr. Michael Vissichelli U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacob Javits Federal Center, Room 1937 New York, New York 10278-0090 Re: Richard Bingham, Fishers Island Pier Extension Dear Mr. Vissichelli: Following up on our site visit on Wednesday, October 30th, we have revised the pier extension application drawings for Mr. Richard Bingham on Hawk's Nest Point on Fishers Island. The additional 1 0 feet you requested brings the project to a total of a 40-foot extension of the existing 6-foot wide pier. This will allow Mr. Bingham's boat to be tied up north of the two small existing clumps of eel grass which currently exist beyond the end of his existing fixed pier. I have also coordinated this modification with the NYS DEC and the Town of Southold and by copy of this letter I am providing each of those agencies with the revised permit application documents. Mr. Bingham is also agreeable to building the pier as you have suggested. I trust that you will find this acceptable so that this permit may be issued without delay. Your assistance has been greatly appreciated. Please give me a call if the need for further discussion arises. Yours truly, Z;~~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm CC: Mr. Richard Bingham NYS DEC: Farkas Southold: C. Cunningham NYS DOS: #F-2002-0876 File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM L;:¡ "." . "'- :n' '~~ " I 19 16 " Q '20 . , " ~ ~ ~ " " :> ~ " 0 " (¡J " Q ~ J mIl! , (¡J f5 ~ ~ ~ ;¡ ~ I 1000 II== :::::: :::::: :::::: r:::I 1000 0 NOTES, EXISTING PIER 1. ELEVA110N DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER . , 2. TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM 2002 NON'< l1DE T .ABLES REÆRENCE , NEW LONDON AND SILVER EEL COVE, FISHERS ISLAND. PROJECT PIER EXTENSION 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTlON, CONSTRUCT 40 .LF OF 6-fT \V1DE FD<ED WDOD I'1LE AND l1MBER I'1ER INCWDING 3 BRÞCED l1E.<JFF RUNGS WATERWAAD OF THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. 4. PROJECT PURPOSE THI5 15 A PRrvATE DOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOAl1NG. NOV2~ ~ 5. THESE APPLICATION DRAIMNGS REPl<E5ENr A COMI'1LATIQN OF SURVEY5 FOR PERMrr ' PURPOSES. THEY ARE NOT CONSTRL'CTlON CONïRN:;T DOCUMENTS. 6. ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS, EAST, MARY MURPHY 1 EAST 66TH 5TREET NEW YORK CrN. NY 10021 WEST TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 MAJN ROAD, P.o. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD NY, 11791 . FISHER'S ISLAND ~VVK'S NEST POINT r.;~~~~~iÞ.~~~~~V ~,..";,.,,,.,,:,~. 'THREE . SISTERS· ;. I"·' [.;".. ,,··..·,.;';ú·COTTAGES";<:·· ~·~(·~~t· ::Jq~~.:~;{Ç~~-:~~lt~~· f'" ..·...~.....'..,,··,...·v @I~,C l~'I''''''. .~.,.,.,....,. .....,-,..,.." Iu r.-7",., '~"""".<¡'---"" '. .. ......~ ::J ~.:~.7 ~~~>W"~.:<¿t,¿.;!;~;.~:- Z ~~N F PROPERlY OF~\';; ~ j. ""u R""~' """..~... "" ."""", « 'So=>M ....-n .~...,,-!...... .< ;'~.:: "¡"f"t<"~!-~,..¡:. ....:<' '~ r "':;00;;: . .... 'h.~ . :'i> ~ ~ ~ . ,i;! U , .!ê:!i ~ I E NO~m.. ~s " ~ ~ ~ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ~~>.~ , MUNNATAWKET AVENUE OVERALL PLAN I 100 50 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 ~ :::: 100' o I 100 PIER EXTENSION REVISED 10-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH AND N01ES REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH AND N01ES PROJECT: LOCATION: WATERWAY: DAlE: APPUCANT: FISHERS ISlAND, TOWN OF SOUlHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISlAND SOUNO SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 2 DOCKO. INC. Keith B. NIIIlaon, PI K:rR1a. CT 08965 Bilo 572-8989 , .=, tI I 1'0' I 'õ ,'" ' [''-' - ".: i,', ~ I 1 I" ¿ l''''.' 4 4·: F ,., t ill' ~ _ £: ' T r r I :. ! 0 ~ ! _ I D..," . . NEW FIXED PIER EXTENSION EL 5 '± EXISTING TIE -OFF PILE EL 18' ± (TYP) ISTING FIXED PIE RAILS TO BE AOO EW DOER NOTE: EEL GRASS BED APPEARS TO START APPROXIMATELY 50' OR MORE NORTh OF ThE EXIS1ING PIER EXISTING BATTER BRACED SUPPORT PILE (TYP) PROFILE DEC\< EL 5 ± DIAGONAL BRACES ß~[TERED GRAPHIC SCALE ,. - 20' <1> FISHERS ISL.AND SOUND ~ru! ~ j¡ JJ. j¡ j¡ j¡ ¡I ~BOULOER ""'--EXISTING EXISTING TIE-OFF PILE DECK EL 5'± (TYP) j¡ ~- j¡ j¡ j¡ M (7YP) 00 EEL GRASS )( -2.6 )C -2.2 NEW SUPPORT PILE (7YP) -4.7 ( '-' ;<¡ "" PLAN VIEW GRAPHIC SCALE l' = 20' I 20 I 20 PROJECT: PIER EXTENSION o REVISED 11-12-02 ACOE PIER LENGTH '?5?œ2 LOCATION: WATERWAY: DAlE: APPUCANT: FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOllTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNIY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISLAND SOUND SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM /~:.-~~~:~~:~ -' ~ . %<" l,..._." '..' l!(~: ~)!;;:'\_', í -, . , H ·ï ._-1 '00,_ ¡.,..,.", '." .,;: 1:C ' , 1(7:' \ I. .. i:' 'I'.. v ".. ·c' , .1 ,\' 1'. . -.... .....¡ . ".:- -' -<"~<':. ;;~::-'~~.~-:,".' . . , '. ':'- ~-;::.:/ ".::;:~~ AGENT: SHEET 2 ,OF 2 DOCKO. INC. Keith B. N8I1IIon, PI!: KJIIUc, CT 08866 880 672-8939 I '" _ ," d' ,",.,_l' .IU'.II"'_:'f I', ~ DECK EL 12.0 I\HWL..~LM / I ..MHW..s..L..1...~ \1 ~L\\LEL J)AJ. NEW PIER END DETAIL NOT TO SCALE o .),. I ;. I ::> I I SPARTlNA' I '-' ;. I "" 00J °0 COASTAL BLUFF ROCKY SHDREFRONT STREWN WITH BOULOERS · . Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) Area Zoning: Residential Previous use of property: Intended use of property: The site is approx. 0.6 acre (+/-) Residential Residential Prior permits / approvals for site improvements: Agency Town of Southold Date 1/30/97 & 6/25/01 10/2/97 & 6/4/01 7/31/97 & 6/18/01 US ACOE NYS DEC No prior permits / approvals for site improvements. Has any permit / approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Extend an existing 6-foot wide fixed pier by 40 (+1-) LF to reach suitable berthing depth all waterward of the apparent high water line. i~'JV 2.::> .,. 2 ¡.- .. - DockoJ Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net October 8, 2002 Ms Carol Farkas NYS DEC Environmental Permits Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 lOr, ·r Re: Richard Bingham, Fishers Island Appl. No. 1-4738-01599/00004 Revised Plans Dear Ms Farkas: Thank you for your letter of September 24, 2002, In accordance with your request for further information, we have added depths along the edge of the existing pier at 10-foot intervals and beyond, reference to the apparent low water elevation. We have also attached a copy of a location map of Fishers Island Sound which shows Mr. Bingham's dock and property and the area that is utilized for navigation which extends out about II.. of a mile off shore. There is no marked channel in this area however, the buoys off shore will delineate a traveiway which is approximately 150 yards offshore at the closest point to Bingham's dock extension. This would place the nearest proximity of the traveiway approximately 300 feet or more from the end of the pier. One copy of this map has been hi-lighted to show the travelway at its nearest point to Bingham's property. During our close examination of the site, we took extra care to mark two small areas of eel grass in close proximity to the end of the pier. The pier extension that we have requested will allow berthing of the boat on either slip, just beyond these two eel grass areas in water that will be deep enough that it will not threaten Mr. Bingham's boat with bottoming out during wavy sea conditions. I trust that this additional information will prove helpful for your review and approval of this project. We look forward to your response. Please give us a call at your convenience. Yours truly, DOCKO, INC. ræÆJ~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm CC: Mr. Richard Bingham Town of South old U.S. Army Corps of Engineers File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM . . Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town ConserVation Advisory Council held Monday, October 7,2002, the following recommendation was made: RICHARD BINGHAM to extend an existing 6' wide fixed pier by 30 (+/-) If. to reach suitable berthing depth all waterward of the apparent high water line. Located: Central Ave., Fishers Island. SCTM#6-4-2 The CAC did not make an inspection therefore no recommendation was made. . . RICHARD BINGHAM PHOTOGRAPH -YE~~JJ';~'j:",":;;(~~'" ~~"'- ~~:- -' .' -. ''':!;~''''-~--,-.'''.- . - --' .~~~~~-,~,r?::;j~'-_ :~-.,-:. '. '-~'. ,-' ..'-.,:..--,.~_._'- . ". - ::-1:" I -_-l:.:.~~ i..c.;'-.?-..:o:;.;;:¡~~.: .-:.--''.::.... ABOVE: THIS PHOTOGRAPH SHOWS MR. BINGHAM'S EXISTING DOCK LOOKING TO THE NORTHWEST FROM THE PATTERSON SITE APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET AWAY. THE 30-FOOT EXTENSION WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET BEYOND THE EXISTING TIE-OFF PILES AT THE OUTER END OF THE DOCK (RIGHT SIDE). NO UPLAND DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED AND THE EXTENSION WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT WATERFLOW AND CIRCULATION OR NAVIGATION. . I 22' " , " " '20 . , " " " " " ,. /-OCA TION 1===== 1000 0 MAP REF. CHART 12372 I GRAPHIC SCALE 1000 YARDS NOTES: 1. ELEVATION DATUM IS MEAN LOWER LOW WATER. 2. TIDE DATA IS TAKEN FROM THE 2002 NOAA TIDE TABLES. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONSlRUCT 30± LF OF 6 FT WIDE FIXED WOOD PIER EXTENSION WfTH lWO BRACED TIE -OFF PlUNGS, WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER UNE. 4. PROJECT PURPOSE: THIS IS A PRIVATE OOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. 5. THESE APPUCATlON DRAWINGS REPRESENT A ClASS "Do SURVEY FOR PERMIT PURPOSES. THEY ARE NOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 6. ADJOINING PROPERlY OWNERS: EAST: MARY MURPHY 1 EAST 66TH ST. NEW YORK CItY, NY 10021 WEST: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 53095 MAIN RO, P.O. BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD. NY 11791 r,_ _I "= =,-, :' =. ¡;:'U"'!",-,_I r....,- . FISHER"S ISLAND HAWK'S NEST POINT , / i .... ¡'.~ r /'{"rHREESISTERSO f \!'M !ir~, !?:1~~¡~ w '-,",-;1'".-,_.,-,., c" ~'""'-.~ ~ ì' . NÌF PROPERTY OF ':.'}' ~ ,-,. MUrœW ··~U·'· . ,"" ~.f-/.,-, - -J r'" ¡::/ ,::', g ~ .-./ ¡:-".~.~ :z EXISTING PIERl (1{){ ,~::"'-\. <, . tJ " -.c...;·o.··,', -~ 0.' or ¡-Ill L.~' -r- ~/ NEW EXTENSION 1 \ \¡SI TE ' i PROPERTY , OF I BINGHAM, \ \ -", , ' , , \ ì . í \ < , I ì ~ î ~ , , TOWN OF SOUTH OLD i~ ,. MUNNATAWKET AVENUE OVERALL PLAN ~ ~ ~ mllff FISHERS ISLAND SOUND PROJECT: E N~S W GRAPHIC SCALE IN = 100' I 100 I 100 50 o PROJECT: LOCATION: WATE~AY: DATE: APPUCANT: PIER EXTENSION FISHERS ISlAND. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY. NEW YORK FISHERS ISlAND SOUND SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 1 OF 2 DOCKO, INC. Keith B. NeililoD. PI: lly8tlc, CT 083155 880 1572-8939 . , E~E~I<± DIAGONAL BRACES BA TIERED PILE NEW BRACED SUPPORT PILE (TYP) NEW TIE -OFF PILE EL 18 'i\ NEW FIXED PIER EXTENSION EL 5 '± EXISTING TIE -OFF PILE EL 18' ± (TYP) XISTING FIXED PIER DECK EL 12.0 EXISTING DECK . ~m ,'~. 'Fc~r·~J;J:{':]~~ " -~' ,_._U~-t-----r-=-"'-=~ ~r-i"',··· ,11 '-. -". ~ .1:. . J. I . _ ~~.~. ;' ~jj. >\" -~_I .A.. ".,..." . .- I "1 .. 11 "',- --.¡: I~~~ .';~ ; ".1'-' ..- - __11 ':~·"~·;"r-~"'-_ 11[1\ \":"Il':~> ;,,' ".;-i·~·c"'''· PROFILE L~[lf'[F 1__('1.'>: 11,(1 I' 11111' I~':"I'I: I '''' II I -bl=",I...LtJ ..JUI-ful:,i ::.:', -." - ~ NOTE: EEL GRASS BED APPEARS TO START APPROXIMATELY 50' NORTH OF THE EXISTING PIER ROCKY SHOREFRONT STREWN WITH BOULDERS ~BOULDER I I I I I : I RAIL\ I . 1l~~nwmT~. ~r~-- ~_.__._.~ I \ I I - I -'- XISTING PIER I I I I I '" ~ " \ I, HWL EL 3.4___ __.._ r II " I~ I. . . I." 1'1 ,'",--- I'll h" PILE (TYP) j¡ !1 NEW PIER EXTENSION EL 5'± EXISTING:-... TIE -OFF PILE " (TYP) NEW BRACED SUPPORT PILE (TYP) NEW J BRACEr/' TIE -OFF j¡ PILE (TYP) :....: II FISHERS ISL.AND I SOUND ~ VIEW ~ru~ ~~ , i PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 20' I 20 o I 20 PROJECT: PIER EXTENSION . -I -6' CLEAR J:l.TLEL~,4_ jAHW EL..l.~ ~.LW...ELO.O_ '\." ",,-' ""'\,,, DETAIL NOT TO SCALE o LA 01 NG I I SPARTlNA I COASTAL BLUFF I '" 0: " ~ c- o: LOCATlON: WATERWAY: DATE: APPLICANT: FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNIY, NEW YORK FISHERS ISLAND SOUND SEPtEMBER 17, 2002 RICHARD BINGHAM AGENT: SHEET 2 OF 2 DOCKO, INC. Keith B. Nel18on, PE Myøtlc, CT 06355 860 572-8939 . 1 , 1 , 1 ¡~ I LOCATION MAP " n PROJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: "PIER EXTENSION" FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY RICHARD BINGHAM SEPTEMBER 17,2002 ___.L-=-~___ 1 , 1 , 1 , --1 , 1 , I 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , ...,---. , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , I , 1 ¡ to , --------- ---"'--"----:~----!-.- APPLICANT: DATE: ---..,. " :,~, SeafJower Reef Light L p. ~ LJ s o~ C9.---t--- . 'uO~\J_ "Cõ I ~f,J~Ó\}i> '. .---- S\W' + ~ ,,_ï'> 'S \ 'S .--- --._-----'+-ZL"'O 1 1 , " - ./" ----------.--- ~--- /~ ~ ~ ... - ~~ . .llghr :..:\26" 6;::;:'~'i....g ,i=' '" I , 1 '0 , --¡------.- , 1 , I , I ~ ~ / ~ . _/~ ~ ~/ ~ í) \J ~ " Î' :¡i. ~ " 6" 'S 0 ;'1- I I' ~ j~-- S Ulh umpling .. .,-,!, I I ~I:~mock , " , ;;~ I Ii I f'//¡, . J-"" ;}~ .~~ ./". n :..-.--.------ "" ,-----~----- - _._------/~- ~ /~ ~ /~ - ~ " -~--- ------,+._---- ;0 " " .. . .. " '0 .' " \ .' '" I' .,¡-'l:-- ,j ,,=___ .... 'I~ " " ~\:\~,,!.orth ,,' ';'~' " ¡ I l:j.~)~~ '.'''''''-===.'''....;::=- -----.. 3 '<" ~ -..;. \-=~':>··---·:~6c-~ t:~~~~-.7:-~--- -~--- 'II- I ~ ~ ~~,.. I.. -" HS\N1t1Ne '., ¡ ""'" ~ :.~. I", .~\ II'Palnt\ , ~,; ';=~/,..:··,1Ii:--;;-;--~"',r, ~,,<.$ }¡\ -;. " '~-~' .~~:. O_I~._ ,·:..·~,Il'..i>· 'l sou T. H 0)" j'Ï:Yt¡(,Ii, 6.~ " " ->- " ',." 1"\'. ,---:'. I West . ""¡ ') . '. ~Rpser.Jt¡1r . ... " ';}--'~.' . ~. _.....;.:.-\~". ..:~-!. í... '.' - "~-""'Ý~~"'1:VJ Harbor ,I 1-1", c -, - } =~_.... ,.,:.,~:~,." , - / l'r j SfOhV! '~-- ¡J / " ',~",~~;// "'" Fishers 6 ~ .; ..t,! (\ ii BeobH. : if (' -".: ·Jlv'¡· Island GOo,.,.".~-;,. -' " ' ¡'[ -~ _, -J.... i:: ;.: ==C<O-Ir{~~~("~'\""'~~:": \ '''t~''"d' ",;:,,'=.~ .il"" ,> _ , . - --- .------~.¡¡.~'.. ---.-.-.-.J. " ~; ,/Ié. . :'-'Ä.+~'··'f - . .J.'-r, L J 'e:!~ -;. I Hay, '. I. L~...:.:. .._ð~ ""~;"t .'Ii:', 2 ~..'~_~,! ,10--," .i~~' , ~ H b... !i.-,E,,;\)_::o,,. ~,~. .," " ,0 _ "j ~. '",\ .... ar or,'~., ,I ~:-¿.(:,. / lV'~~'''',;:.:~,'':·', I. ,\'",'" "OL'e) -It...... ~ 11 \.- ,/' ", \,> '.~ . )~( . .," \l~"')i::' \ ),-;.'. .:; I. "; "-::~;;;~. '" I ' ,I" ':, ',' 'r' ~~.;j' ~'\\ .',..1' i' ~', V'~:'·"·h.. >."',' . 1_ ' ,......." '." '. J'. '-þ ~ . t . '."'" .--. ..' '! " ,;;."''- :;",o\,1,...1..,,,,/,,,,,~,. i;r~;..·· " '\~ I~'<I \) J é./'- ". 'II " :"\.-ì;.'"", d~-I'~"~:Jt'L"¡"NO';" '.,\1 Silver Ed 'Cove i<-. '\."'~.13M . ~.~,,'=",.;,.r"'~~";"\" '-,~.~ I.",' .', t"",r/ o'!.,"',.65 ';"'''~~\'' .~ "",5 Golf ""~"" ~~, us COASTS?Al.{.. ~ ~~v /'~))'o~:;(.- .' :_ø1~"~: _ '~S. ~~"..\ I' COl;fSf'_ _.:) ·:1.-1¥. ~r" "" _::~ -<' ,,~~ .-/r ....à.. ,"."'),/7.t\¡ 'þ~'e-\," s--:"'~", ~~I' .....--..__BM<;"·prosp.ct - ì _...... <\/, ~~"'~~I ,.," .. 0 ,'!'"c:--. ro~~.,,)) /ì' ,../ ·..'.:-:-;~'ìJ'l. ~...\,;.:/: .:,. , - L-..~.\\,,t(,(í~r'h·:R,\\ HI" ~.) 1:\.)/ ~~>"".>"" " ç)~~__c-!o .....11'-,:- ':::: 's-n.1fl)l~ ('ENI~K r .;, "",."~,,, I. , "-'.....~\" ~.' ------ ~ -).«-~-~~ ~~'~:~I">:-::o~' '''~ND" so~,,: i;~:.:, +,' ElM I 28 1_, _J - 3Û I ;r, '.. T" I' J I, I .. " 'r --------~---. " .' " ---- --------- --._- " ,sa .- - , -."'<,(\IT. "..\J .~ "'"'"'\W~~~;~' -~""",r..'V,.··. TAX ASSESSOR' MAP 06, SECTION 4, WT 2 PROJECT: WATERWAY: LOCATION: "PIER EXTENSION" FISHERS ISLAND SOUND FISHERS ISLAND, TOWN OF SOUTH OLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY RICHARD BINGHAM SEPTEMBER 17,2002 APPLICANT: DATE: IS . ( 4 "0 1 :, .. ].IA So v" o '" '" ® 1.1' LO,O'<c) 1).3 4.1' J~ ~ r- -"'" CD COUNTY OF SUFFOLK , -. SOUIHOLD S~-:"ION NO m::"H O......IM, ~ NOTICE nso«s...__ ~ 'ou.""l'CI DlIT"""'" r OX Service Agency , . .- - ~,AlTtlllTD(,1AI.[1I'I Real Property y ~,. ~~. 006 .. -, IIIT~~""'O'OITOIorfN[ Count)' Center" RlverNod,N Y mOl ,. - . ..Q 1oIE'{:Uco..NT·rUIlUÞ5_r[D U --~ IITIOJI IIITTDI P£-.sD' or TIf: . , . - , - .. tlSTllltINJ 1000 "'"um IlEAlPlllP(O" '&I KJlYC:EAOE/CT. 5C1.1.£,,·ar, p PROPERTY .AN> CON£II!.OIo.Tt, _.1),,... ---- . // ~' \,!' . ~ o\.....,~ ~dj ~"ì' ~. ¡¡ . ..:; 1.7 . ,J'--, ~ ~¿ ~ :z: ~ ~ .~ 0,. ~ ¡~/1KIHS ~, "- , \~. 04; ¿ .. -~ '1>,5' ;¡. ,,~ N '& ~~ ¡ -1-""""-- ..~ II~ iL ."" O4'þ- '\ %- . § i í ------t=..-,,-- sÓ'~ 'Ys& / '\ ~. . Albert J. Krupski, President James King. Vice President HenI)' Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTH OLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~Wetland Permit Application ___Grandfather Permit Application Waiver/Amendment/Changes ~ Received Application: 9~/O3-) ~ Received Fee: .Q\OO" - Completed Application '.'A.3/0)..J Incomplete Y' SEQRA Classification: ~ Type I Type II Unlisted V' ~Coordination: (date sent) 1110/03 ~ CAC Referral Sent: ~~3L61.J _____Date of Inspection: -JO/9Joµ ____ Receipt of CAC Report: Lead Agency Determination: Technical Review: ............Public Hearing Held: JD/lb/Oµ . Resolution: E.: Name of Applicant Richard Bingham Address Central Avenue, Fishers Island, NY 06390 Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 1~ SQ !ì;\- Lf 1,<;:> cc:! (:. " 2 3 'J"'.-' '-_. ,h Phone Number: (415) 788-7354 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 06 - 4- 2 Property Location: Central Avenue, Fishers Island, (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Docko, Inc., Keith B. Neilson, P.E. (If applicable) Address:p. O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 Phone: Fax: (860) 572-8939 (860) 572-7659 1 F ~ Ç:DC~ \J...\::1., \I CI.A:t \ 4: ~).'O'/ JY~ø..\1JI" eti' . Board of Trustee. . Applioation GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet) Area Zoning: Residential Previous use of property: Intended use of property: The site is approx. 0.6 acre (+/-) Residential Residential Prior permits / approvals for site improvements: Agency Town of Southold Date 1/30/97 & 6/25/01 10/2/97 & 6/4/01 7/31/97 & 6/18/01 US ACOE NYS DEC No prior permits / approvals for site improvements. Has any permit / approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental agency? x No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary) : Extend an existing 6-foot wide fixed pier by 30 (+/-) LF to reach suitable berthing depth all waterward of the apparent high water line. 2 . Board of Trust_s . App~j,catj,on WBTLAND I TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION' DATA Purpose of the proposed operations: The purpose of this project is to provide access for recreational boating. Area of wetlands on lot: 250 (+1-) square feet Percent coverage of lot: 1 (+/-) % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: 0 feet Does the project involve excavation or filling: X No Yes If yes, how much material will be excavated? N/A cubic yards How much material will be filled? N/A cubic yards Depth of which material will be removed or deposited: N/A feet Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: N/A Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: N/A Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): There may be some effect on wetlands and shallow tidal waters as a result of this project due to shading and short term minor impacts during piling installation. 3 . Board of Trustees . Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA N / A Purposes of proposed activity: Are wetlands present within 75 feet of the proposed activity? No Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? No Yes If Yes, now much material will be excavated? How much material will be filled? (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: Describe the nature and extent of the environmental reasonably anticipated resulting from implementation project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) impacts of the Sl:~ 2 ::: L_ 4 . . NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD In the matter of applicant: Richard Bingham SCTM#IOOO- 06 - 4 - 2 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to request a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: Extend an existing 6-foot wide fixed pier by 30 (+/-) LF to reach suitable berthing dept all waterward of the apparent high water line. 2. That the property which is the is located adjacent to your follows: subject of Environmental Review property and is described as Central Avene 3. That the property which is subj ect to Environmental Review under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment. You may contact the Trustees Office at 765- 1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not reference any other agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME: Richard Bingham MAILING ADDRESS: Central Avenue Fishers Island, NY 06390 PHONE #: Agent (860) 572-8939 '. -j t.. Ene.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for your convenience. 5 09/18/2002 14:54 86057219 DOCKO INC . PAGE 08 ---- - ..------.. Board of Trustees Application G " 5tN)'\.. ¡: r"-"".cV, oú eURty ..... .i···...elL- ~tat.9 of ~1.f Y9>.lI Co... ( ; fwV\ ì 0-.- Richard Bingham BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE / SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMIT (5) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT ALL WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S), IF GRANTED, IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(S) OR REPRESENTATIVE(S), TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. v ~Ú(¡~'L Signature SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS I g tl" DAY OF ~lvm.bvt- , 2002... ~O- L~~ Notary PublJ.c j - - - - ~=EI~ii t ¡ ~ Notay PI.CIIc - CaIIIaniQ ~ j~~~~1 r, L '- 7 09/18/2002 15:00 85057219 DOCKO INC . Board of Trustees Application AUTHORIZATION (..1,,6.l~ t.hl:. ðJ1plisaat is not: I, Richard Bingham residing at (print owner of property) Central Avenue (mailing address) Fishers Island, NY ( ÆfpUCI'tNT U t.tr.ð oWh~r) ~__ do hereby authorize Pocko, Inc, (Agent) PAGE 01 OwNéR.., ) P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 to apply for permit(s) from the Southold Board of Town Trustees on my behalf. ~ 4?{~~~ B . . Decke, Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net September 19, 2002 NYS DOS Department of Coastal Resources 41 State Street, 8th Floor Albany, NY 12231 Re: Richard Bingham, Fishers Island Pier Extension To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of our client, we submit the attached Federal Consistency Assessment Form for a pier extension on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: .:. Two prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: "Pier Extension" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham September 17, 2002 Applicant: Date: .:. Two copies of Corps of Engineers, NYS DEC and Town of Southold Application forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map and NYS DOS Coastal Management Federal Consistency Assessment Forms. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable: please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, ~o KO ~C'\ , {00~¿-. eith B. Neilson, P.E. .- ':' KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Richard Bingham NYS DEC: Environmental Permits Town of South old: Krupski File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM . COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form . An applicant, seeking a permit, license, waiver, certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program (CMP, shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur wIthin and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations (15 CFR 93057(. It should be compOleted at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in ¡IS review of the applicant's certification of consistency. A. APPLICANT 1. Name: 2. Address. 3 Telephone: RICHARD BINGHAM CENTRAL AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND NY 06390 Area Code (415) 788-7354 B. PROPOSED ACTIVITY Brief description of activity: EXTEND AN EXISTING 6-FOOT FIXEO PIER BY 30 (+/-) FEET TO REACH SUITABLE BERTHING OEPTH. ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 1. Purpose of activity: THIS IS A PRIVATE OOCK FOR RECREATIONAL BOATING. 2 Location of activity' SUFFOLK COUNTY County SOUTHOLD City, Town orVilJage NORTHWEST OF HAWK'S NEST POINT Street or Site Description 3. Type of federal permit' license required. US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 4. Federal application number, if known: NOT YET KNOWN 5. If a state permit J license was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identify the state agency and provide the application or permit number, if known: C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YESØ or "NO" for each of the following questions. The numbers following each question refer to Ihe policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity. YES NO Will the proposed activity ~ in any of the following: a Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (11, 22, 25, 32, 37, 36, 41, 43). b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreJine, land under water or coastal waters? (2. 11. 12, 20, 28. 35, 44).. .. . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . .. c. Revitalization J redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? (1). d Reduction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? (19,20). . . e Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9,10). f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29). . . g Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27). . . h. Mimng, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? (15, 35). ... . ...... . . . ... . . . ....... ...... . . . ... Discharge of taxies, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters?(B, 15,35) j. Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33) . . . . k. Transport, storage, treatment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39). I. Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4). 2. Will the proposed activity ~ or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) .. b. Federally designated flood and J or state designated erosion hazard area? (11, 12, 17). c. Slate designated significant fish and' or wildlife habitat? (7). d. State designated significant scenic resource or area? (26) . e. State designated important agncultural lands? (26). . f. Beach, dune or barrier island? (12). . . . . . . . . . . . . g Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3)... h. State, country, or local park? (19. 20) . . . . . Histone resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23). , .JL .JL x .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL .JL ............... . 3. WiU the proposed activity ~ any of the following: 8. Waterfront site? (2,21,22). b. Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5). c. Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16). d. State water quality permit or certification? (3D, 38, 40) . e. State air quality permit or certification? (41, 43) -1- . --"- --"- L --"- --"- . 4 Will the proposed activity occur within and I or affect an area covered by a State approved Local waterfront revitalizatIon program? (see policies in local program document) . --"- D. AODITIONAl STEPS If all of the questions in Section C are answered "NO", then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and Sub the documentation required by Section F. 2. If any of the questions in Section are answered ~YES~, then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CM?, or where appropriate, the local waterfront revitalization program document. The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. In the space provided below or on a separate page (s), the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify, by their policy numbers, which coastal policies are affected by the activity, (b) briefly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and (c) state how the activity is consistent with each policy. Following the completion of this written assessment. the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F. E. CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program. as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shan not be undertaken. If this certification can be made, complete this Section. -The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program.· Applicant I Agen!'s Name: OOCKO INC. KEITH B NEISLON P.E. Address: POBOX 421 MYSTIC CT 06355 Telephone: Area Code (860) ~ Applicant I Agent's Signature: (i&t! ~ )" JJ.\--t...-- F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Oale 5;¡;L.t.M'1} ~Z 1. The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, 162 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY 12231. a. Original signed form. b. Copy of the completed federal agency application. c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency. 2. The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his I her application to the federal agency. 3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form, contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000. WITH REGARO TO 2a & b. THE FOLLOWING IS OFFER EO. MR. BINGHMAN;S DOCK IS LOCATED ON THE WATERFRONT (2a, 2b, & 3a) ANO AS SUCH IS LOCATED WITHIN THE FEOERALL Y OESIGNATEO FOOD ZONE ANO STATE JURISOICTION FOR TIDAL WETLANOS (LESS THAN 6' DEPTH). THERE ARE TIOAL WETLANDS TO THE EAST OF THE DOCK AND A SMALL FRING WHERE WORK IS TO BE DONE. THE SPAR TINA WILL NOT BE OAMAGED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. NYS WATER QUALITY CERTIIFCATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT BY THE CLEAN WATER ACT. THIS PROJECT REPRESENTS NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND WILL NOT CAUSE ANY DETERIORATION TO SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES, WATER FLOW AND CIRCULATION; IT IS CONSISTENT WITH PROGRAMS FOR PROTECTION OF WATERS. TIOAL WETLANDS. AND PROTECTION OF THE COASTAL ZONE. WITH REGARD TO ITEM 2c, ALL BEACHES ON FISHERS ISLAND ARE CLASSIFIEO AS NESTING HABITAT FOR SHORE BIRDS. HOWEVER. THIS PROJECT IS SCHEOULEO FOR COMPLETION IN LATE WINTER, AND WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE TYPICAL BREEOING PERIODS, THUS MITIGATING ANY IMPACT. THE OOCK EXTENTION WILL IN ITSELF NOT IN ANY WAY OETERIORATE THE QUALITY OF BREEOING HABITAT. *These state and local documents are available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies, Department of Environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices, and the appropriate regional and county planning agencies. local program documents are also available for inspection at the offices of the appropriate local government. -2 - . . ; . Cocko, Inc. P.O. Box 421, Mystic, CT 06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net September 19, '2002 Mr. Michael Vissichelli U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacob Javits Federal Center, Room 1937 New York, New York 10278-0090 Re: Richard Bingham Pier Extension Dear Mr. Vissichelli: On behalf of Mr. Richard Bingham we request a Department of the Army Permit for a pier extension on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose herewith the following in support of this permit application: .:. Two prints each of plans titled: Applicant: Date: "Pier Extension" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham September 17,2002 Project: Waterway: Location: .:. Two copies of Corps of Engineers and NYS DEC Application Forms, Location Map, Tax Assessor's Map, photographs and NYS DOS Federal Consistency Assessment Form. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Please let us know if you would like to make a site visit and we will make the necessary arrangements. Very truly yours, ~'~ Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Richard Bingham NYS DEC: Environmental Permits Town of South old: Krupski File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM 1:::1':1/ lö/ LI::H::J:'¿ ..I.Q::l4 I:! b 1:::1:1 tL t::J. lJUL.K.U INL . t-'Al;Ic. Ut> . . APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OI"TlŒARMY PERMIT OMS APPROVAL NO. 0710.003 (33 CFR 115) Milo <qIOItioI botda> fO( dIis ""¡lrMIno of iAfoII»MIœ ÎI_ '" _ , boon .......,...., inoll>diÐ¡ the - Cot JCYiowiaa IDøucIiœI, .......... oxiItÓIC...... _ tpIIIIaiaa ODd JIIOÎ,QIOIAiO& die...... -w...s ...,.".,................Ictrio& Ibo ""'......... of~. Sa>d ..... - ,...... tbit _...... aC.., _""""" oldUo <01_ of IDb'rnIIi<>a, IDdUllù>ø a'~ Cotndu<inl dUo b........ '" ~ofDolØlo<. W-··.... ~ SoMce ~ of "'-....... 0p0nIi_1IId Repom. 1215 10_ DoviJ His/lwoy. Suill: 1204, Arlio¡1œ. V A 22~02"302; ond '" clio 0Øiœ of"'· - _ODd BudFI. ~ ltoduoUoo I'roj... (0710-0003), WahiP...... DC ~0'03. PIooIo DO NOT RE11111N your i>nD "'._ oI'ttx. _. Complolod IIppIlcllioDII_ be ,_10 die DiJlr\ot En¡¡inoor blvinajurisdiction .... "'" Ioallloa of1l>o ptopOIOd .....Ity. , PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT AudIoriIy. 33 use 401, S«:Iioo 10; 1413. S«:Iioo404. Priœi¡IoI PurJ-: 1'bac Iowllcqun pamaOll1hori2illc IØlÎYitIea ia, _ipbIo_ofdJe lJaiIod SI-. ............. of*"""'" 0< ftII-w "*' _ of... UDiIod S_1PcI1bo __ of,""""..-IoI ... 11><...- "'.......iI"*'_-. Raurh>c u...: 1D6:xmIdoo """,idol! 00 dIis form will be uscd in mol........ rhilappli<lllloa Cot . pamil DiI<_: DiIoIoaIIR 0(........... info<a>aIk>IIlI "vol.....,.. 1/ IÐtonDa<ioo1 i, DOl proridecI. however, the penWI applioodoo O&IIIJOC be >IOOINOd ..,. - . ponnk be iwIod. 0... oetofoopohwinporþ>Od,,-bl< "'1'101 "'""" sbow1bc1o<olioo 0Dd__ oflbo ~ ocIivity_beallaGllod IDdIiI appIk:Idoa (...1IIIIpIo drawiDp aød insInItIiooI) ODd be a.....nu.t ID tha DUlriá En¡¡iaoer haw... jllrildiáiool oftha ..-d OOIivily. ,.. 'PI''' ..' ~ ...... IlOl ["- .a iøl\llloriUbe.-...d. (ITEMS 1 THRU 4 ro BE F1LJ.ED BY THE CO/U'S) I. APPUCA 110N NO. r FIELD OFFICE CODE r. DATE RECEIVED I,.DATI! APP. COMPLE'IEP rrEJ/$ BEWW ro /IE F1LJ.ED /lY,4PPL1CAN1' 5. APPUCANI'S NAME I. Atm!ORIZE.D AOENTS NAME 4 ''fJU; RJCHARD BINGHAM DOCKO, INC. KEITIt 8. NEILSON, P,E. 6. APPLlCANT'S ADDRESS 9. AOENTS ADDRESS CENTRAL AVENUE P.O.80X421 FISHERS ISLAND, NY 06390 MYSTIC, CT 063~~ 7. APPUCANT'S PHONE NO'S W/~ CODE 10. AGENI'S PHONE NO'S W/ARBACODE L1I.t:I1_ .. R..ldenco b. au...... (415) 788-7354 b. BUliDcu (860) ~72-8939 II. STt\.TEMENTOf AlITHOR1ZATJON 1IIoIoby..doooúõe, tJOCKO.INC. to "'" in O1y beII..f. O1y _In ...._'iDl of dUo appJica"'lDII ro furnitb. upoo requat. -;z:-~. ~~!oy RICHARD BINOHAM NAM!!. LOCATION AND DESClUP110N OF PROJECT OR ACtWITY 12. PROJECT NAM!! OR Tffi.E (See ....,.ot....) PIER EXTENSION 13. NAM!!OF WA1'BI\B0DY, IFICNOW(ifapplical>le) 14. PROJ1!C' STREET ¡\.DDRESS (lfapplical>Jo) FISHERS ISLAND SOUND CENTItAL AVENUE FISHERS ISLAND. NY 06390 IS. LOCA 110N OF PROJECT SUFFOLK COUNTY MY COUNTY STATE 16. c:mœJI, LOCATION DESCRJPTJDNS.IF ICNOWN. (See_) LATlTIJDE:41016' 17"N, LONOI11JDE: 72° 00' 3~" W 17. DIRBCTIONS TO THE SITS PIlOM 'lliB I'ISHERJllS.LAND FER\!. Y TERM\N.AL OIl AIIU'ORT PROCIiED I!AST ON WHIS11!Il A VB. w>ÐCH BECOMES EQUESTRIAN DRIVE. BEAll Ll!FI' ON MANSION HOUSE DRIVE. 11tEN RlOIU ON CEN11IAL A VB. \.EPT ON CRESCENT A VI! TO TIiE END AT FISHERS ISlAND SOUND, IIIOIIT ON CENTRAL ^ Vf.. (3 SISTI!IO.IiJ IiNO FOIIM '''''', Fob. EDmON OF SEP 9118 OBSOL5TE. (P..........:CSCW'OR . " ~~/ldIL~öL Lq;~4 Ö.btl~/L.'~. UUL.K.U lNG . t-'A(;>!:. ~, , II. IÜobJIO of ^«i.it)' (Dooaiplioo of project. include III bIwos) EXTEND AN 1!X1STlNG 6-FOOT fIXED PIER BY 30 (+/-) PEET TO REACH SmTABLE BERmINO DEPTH, ALL W~RW ARD OF mE APPARENT mGH WATER LINE. 19. 1'rOjecI Purpcoc (Dclaibo \be..... ot purpooc of\be P"'Jea. ... ÍIIIIl\I<Û<IIII) THIS IS A PRlV ATE DOCK FOR RECREA TIONA!. BOATING. USI: BI.OCKS »-n IF DJU:DG[) AND/OR J1Jl.L MA 'BIUAL 111 1'0 H pJ1ll'BAlGm 20. _(.) IOrDis<:hoqJc N/A 21. Typo (s) ofMaloriIl Boin¡¡ DIJåiot.... ODd \beA/nO..,1 of Each 1)>c.. Cuble Y- NlA 22. Sotfoa: ARlo;" Aaos ofW<II_ ot OllIe< W-. Filled (... .-) N/A 23. fa.....) _ oflb< WO<Ic AJtead) Completo? Yes NoX IF YBS. DßSÇItIIIE nm COMPLETIiD WORJ( 24. Md<cua of Nljoinin¡ Property Qwuon, l.esocCI, E"'.. Whooc I'ropcny NljoÍIII the WIIItrbody (lflllOfO.... - be entued -. J>Io-_a~Ii"), EAST: MARY MURPHY. I EAST 66TH ST., NEW YORK, NY 10021 WEST: TOWN OF SOUTItOLD, 53095 MAIN RD., P.O. BOX 1119, SOUTIfOLD, NY J 1791 2.5. L.io<olOdlorConili<olloosClt A¡>>IvY_ills R_I..d from """" FodoooI. S_ otLooal AjooçiellbrWod: Dooøibed Iø TIlls AJpI"-rI "OENCY NYS DEC NYSDOS TOWN Of SOIJTHOLlJ TYI'E /J'PROVA!.· IDI!NI'. NUMBER DATE J\PPLIED PENDING PENDING PENDING DATE /J'PIlOVED D" TE DENIED .WouI4 _ but it _ .-;<*<110 ~ buildina ond Oood lala pormiIs. 26. t.ppIlcmoa"blnbylUdolOra . IbeWO<lc_bodialbio.....7A~"'IIIio....,._.. c:oøopIoIo.... 1 '1)"1D0\be~_becl'" -.-lpItofllM;oppI1:c. Þ X If ¡)~ "'-- c¡ ICf Z. DATE SIONATUREOI' AGENT DATE RJCIL\RD BINGHAM KEITH ø. NEILSON. P.B.. DOCICO, INC. Tho .....1_ ...... be .i,...,.t by 1110 penon """ dol... '" _ tho proposod .,.;.ity (..,pIi-)" it IIUI)' be .iplOd by. duly IIIIIoizxd 1IOIII1f1bo _iDbIodtll...._lIIJodoulODd.iønod. II U.S.C. _1001 J"O"idollbal: ~,Ia MIY....................j..udJclioo Df..,...........lIIor.......,y oflboUDi...._1œowIøaIY and wiUt\llty twllfiea. oooçcals, or œwn \lp ay triçk. I~ (If cüsçuita . ml&cri&l ÚÇt or rnakeI M.)' f'aho. &titiOUl or ~ IIMCmOIRI OIl I~ . \onI œ.... 01' UKI allY faIac wriIiD¡ Ol ¿.".....-I kDowina ADJC.IO COÐC:ain ay faIIc. fic:tlÛOUI Œ budu.&.1t åMCIIIQCatI or Ultry, aMIJ be fiDed DOC øw;R than $10,000 or impIUCacd aallDOœ sn- .0\'11 ygID or bolla. ·U.S.GI'O:I99A-S2O-f7&11:2011 " " . . .. Cocko. Inc. p.o. Box 421, Mystic, CT06355 (860) 572-8939 Fax: (860) 572-7569, e-mail: docko@snet.net September 19,2002 NYS DEC Environmental Permits Building 40, SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11790-2356 Re: Richard Bingham Pier Extension To Whom It May Concern: On behalf of Mr. Richard Bingham we request a Tidal Wetlands Permit including Water Quality Certifications, as necessary, for a pier extension on Fishers Island, New York. We enclose the following in support of this permit application: .:. Four prints each of plans titled: Project: Waterway: Location: "Pier Extension" Fishers Island Sound Fishers Island, Town of Southold Suffolk County, New York Richard Bingham September 17,2002 Applicant: Date: .:. Four copies of the NYS DEC Joint Application, including the Short Environmental Assessment Form, Tax Assessor's Map, Photographs and Location Map. I trust that you will find this application package complete and acceptable; please let me know if the need for further information arises. Very truly yours, ¡::;:~~J- Keith B. Neilson, P.E. KBN:jm Enclosures CC: Richard Bingham US ACOE Town of Southold: Krupski File: 96-09-705 BINGHAM U~t~Ot~dU~ ~~.~~ OO()~{"-{~. L'u.....r'\u ~I'i.... . ï'1-I1Jt.. t::JLf JOINT APPLICATION * 16-1N(IIOOPfþ œ New YOlk a_ FOR PERMIT .. '. UnJted SIatee I'v:my Corp. of Engln....'" ~1Ig~..~~~1a1lld..1lllm1. ......t'MCII..~on...... ~~~..,...... ".....pfrII~ar~ 1."-........._"'" ..-.._ (Iloo""'_1 "__<_1 NYW DÞpt. 01 ~t'OftIMonIIII tel.... ..-on RICHARD BINGHAM (-415) 788-735-4 o _........._ood_1 -""- D _I¡doW....(e-._IndFIII) CENTRAl. AVENUE o Docks, MooI1rQI "'- ...... 01Iloo '_1__ (CoI'oI1v<I",-.) FISHERS ISLAND NY 08390 D Do.. ood "'-""'"*" __ ..'-..<...._~_.............) (""","",,,R_"'~ o r-.._-... EJ nIoI_ ..~..Iri...: (c:tJøcj(,_~..~) c.-_<>nd ø awn. 0 _ D~ D~fGoo_..._.o.I""'" 8 WMd, &o.nIc: -.d~ RJwr. S. It Bppiœnt. not hi 0'IIINt, /cI8IMIIy 0I¥Mt hent· ÐÖWN.... )OU rM'j prDVWa~PwwoninlcJtnJllaoll. 11' .wtw..QYIIIit)'CerWqaan ...........-......- 0 """"'0_1ConIad_ T'---) o "-'"oW_Supply KEITH B. NEILSON, P.E_ COCKO, tNC. (860) 572-89311 o ~.......w... -.- o _v_....C«*vI p, O. BOX 421 B--CaWQ MŸsiië ,-". .,.. CT 06355 ..... "'-- "~'FadItr u.c.ton (n1Id.looM\orIonnwp.... ~,..) .,.,.. ~ ofGtMtll...... """"" T~ 1'_ ...... 8edIm''' A.oI ~ (..... ""'*' ....... u.-_) SUFFOLK SOUTHOLD, F.I. 06-4'2 o '-.Ucoo.o._.. ~(--"'- 1,'--'-' 0ItW ~ PropMJ IntIIrWt CENTRAL AVENUE (-415) 788-735-4 """"------ -""') ,.. 01Iloo I ~ IZlpCOCl8I ¡T........ ---.or W"'Uio 'Qlnor~IJfCiMt...) o .....-...,."'P_ FISHERS ISLAND NY 06390 FISHERS ISLAND SOUND (""",""",,,,PIooo) ...... L ..... Aaerwrt .. ..... gf UIOe au.d ...: u...... c~ & .... 0___ NEW LONDON, CT-Rl-NY ...,.".,. N'fIW.I 4 o WIId._....__RNwo ........ r V·rn.... ~(Ca.garyolAcCMcy..g.MW~'¡. ..meII"'__lK tt;"CIttßdIIt; TW-oI~tWAmvfty.·IJ.~,(tf"edgIng,""dIm.dodc,"*'"8d~ Tw-d........ aJd~ 8tNc::tUfIIMdWortAret~; N.cf øtP"1II]XIM ~ ~ Geot8t "'-k eomr'r-1Tn o .... (Conotnd '" PIIOI) EXTEND AN EXISTING 6-FOOT WIDE FIXED PIER BY 30 (+J..) LF TO REACH 0_(-.) SUITABLE BERTHING DEPTH, ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER UNE. UI_c...,... _ o _...(W........u.-J_) 0-'0(-............""1 PREVIOUS PERMITS; 0--(0) __0' TOWN OF SOUTH0LD-l/4694. 1/30197 AND 111635-4, 6/25101 'Of~LIN~ US ACOE- 1197-04960.1012197 & #1997-0496~1L2, 814101 Dee APPUCAT""" HUM8EA. NYS DEC. #1-4738-01599I00001, 7131197 & '1....738-01599I00003. 8116121 us ARMr CORP$ OF ENGIfEERS -, I"'~ =0 91....' -.. 000 \r:.., ......_f'uDlic~ Y.. No JAN 03 FEB. 03 w. .... WorII. ..... MI PntfMC1' (If ~ ~ 0 0 ,...UtIII~PwnMt/~,Jf' .. . ~....~ <f.....) ,...._,01....._____) Y.. No (SEE ABOVE) ,.. WIIItNtÞnljeøl;....... ·f(~ ~ ø ° :':':UIt US ACoe, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD '..... ....." i.aoIII...."..? ,... No 17_.......... ......... ............ __........ Jf" . . I t.r.by IIftIrm 1NI a.ÂIo Ii...... ~ on thia torm and.. . rlr....IUbmIttMI,.......,...hBkJlhI~åmr..ll ~ ~alMdww. F-. ~._...n.-llt'IIrrIIn ... ~ _. a.a A~~t ID 1«IIIDP210,ai ullhe """law'. fw1her. Þ lifIPMcwIt....u -lr ..~ ..,........ drtd or.,...,.., aI~"". Md b)'''''''''''' 1Uhrwd. .... ota: dIM ptCjMS ~... Md... g ~ Me!.e'ie"""'''' 8al6.frutn........ ~ InI COIdII at iWWY,..,..,w;! ~ ....... t'gm IIoMf prq.ci-I!iMc.aon.,...... LIIwr, 1Ø u';;:c.. ~ 1001 pnMdIlt b'." ~ nDI fI'ICR '*' .'o.OOO"~"'_"""""5_"'~ . .7" 7" _",_",._i0oi;",__ "'-1¡;¡~"'bAMtt- v. ;Ø:;//¡( 0:>000 It, .t~_ 8'gnoIuro of ," . ~ '..,.-r TIle o.w1¡,i-f,V s-. ,,C,_X" ¿,Ú . 7- J .P--J:/ / - TIle I RESET I . " .' ~ -, -~-- I PROJECT ID NUMBER -'. j ......"-'.....1''"' ....,..... . ïH\.::It:. "~ 817.20 ","PENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY REVIEW SHORTEN~RONMENTALASSESSMENTFORM for UNLI8TED ACTIONS Only ( To be oomp/eIed by llcanl or Project Sponoor) 2. PROJECT NAME PIER EXTENSION 8EQR PMT 1 : PROJECT INFORMATION 1. APPUCANT I SPONSOR RICHARD BINGHAM 3.PROJ~CT LOCATION: FISHERS ISU\ND, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK ~ County ..PRECISE LOCATION: _ Add... _ Roed _. PromInont ............ ole -0< _ mop CENTRAL AVENUE 3. IS PROPOSED ACTION: 0 New 0 Expenoon 0 IAodIIIoaöon 1_ 8. OESCRIBf PROJECT BRJEFL V: EXTEND.-.N EXISTING ~FOOT WIDE FIXED PIER BY 30 (+'-) LF TO REACH SUITABLE BERTHING DEPTH. ALL WATERWARD OF THE APPARENT HIGH WATER LINE. 7. AMOUNT Of LAND AFFECTED: InIIIeIIy 0.8..... U IIa1IO 8. WILl PROPOS~D ....CTION COMPL V WITH EXISTING lONING OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS? o v.. 0 No W no,_be_y: y. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT7 (ChooM.. mony.. 0IIJ4y.) 0""'''"otiW Dlndullriel OCommen:lel ~ OPIllk/F"",ot/OpenSpIIC» OOlher (doeaIÞe) 10. DOES Þ.CTION INVOlVE A PERMIT J>PPfl,(NN-. OR FUNDING. NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM NoIY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ¡\GENCY /FodenII, Stale or local) øy" DNa ~ yeti. IiIIC ~cy name """ _ I _.1: 11. DOES AA,V ....SPECT OF THE ....CTION HAVE .... CURRENTLY VN-ID PERMIT OR IoPPROVAL? DVM 0Na II yeti. llel ogency name end ponnill ~III: LT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT I APPROVAL REQUIRE 040DtFICIo.TION7 ~ No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AIIOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF ~ KHOWLEDGE / Aps>IcenI H lb. Ktion I. . CoMal Þ.r.a. and you _ a ... -oency, complet. .... COIIatal Aa..ument Form beror. proc:.edlng with thl. ......m_ II .' . . PART II, IMPACT ASSESSMENT /To be comDleted bv Lead ADenevl A. DOES ACTION EXCEEO ANV TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NVCRR. PART 617.47 If yes, coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. . . 0 Ves 0 No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COOROINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NVCRR. PART 617.67 If No, a negative dedaration may be superseded by another involved agency. OVes DNo C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answ.... may be handW_n, K legible) C1. ExIsting air Quality, suñaC8 or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic panam. saiki waste production or disposal. potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: I I C2. Aesthetic, agricuttural, archaeological, historic, or other natural or cultural resources; or community or neighborhood character? Explain brieRy: I I C3. Vegetation or fauna. fish. sheltfish or wildlife species, significant habitats. or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: I I ce. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted. or a change In use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly: I I C5. Growth. subsequent development, or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly: I I C6. Long term, short term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-C5? Explain briefly: I I C7. Other jmnacts /jncludino cha~es in use of either Quantity or woe of enerav? Exolalnbrieflv: I I D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA (CEA)? (If yes, explain briefly: I o Ves 0 No I E. IS THERE. OR IS THERE LlKEL V TO BE. CONTROVERSV RELATEO TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? If yes explain: I o Ves 0 No I PART III, DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be oompleted by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identlfiad above, determine whether It is substantial, large, Important or otherwise significant. Each effect ehould be assessad in connection with its (a) setting (I.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (e) duretion; (d) IlTeverslbllity; <a) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting matenals. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identlfiad and adequately addn>ssed. If question d of part iI wae checked yes, the determination ofsignfftcance must evaluate the potential impactofthe proposed action on theenvironrnental characteristk::s of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAYoccur. Then proceed direcUy to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive dedaration. Check this box If you have detennined, based on the Information and analysis above and any supporting documentStion, that the proposed actio! WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmenlallmpacts AND provide, on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting thl delennination. Name of Lead Agency Date Pnnt or Type Name of Responsible Officer In Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of ResponsIble OffICer In Lead Agency Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)