The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTR-5396Board Of $outhold Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO.. ~'~.~(~ .... DATE: ..-S..?.t L. ~.L--~01 ISSUED TO 3OS~,PH M. PAGT,IARULO ,ttt-l arizatian Purs,',ant to'the provisions of Chapter 615 of the I~ws of' the Stele of New York, 1893; and C.h~pter 40~ of the I~ws of ~e State of New Yo& 19~2~ end ~e ~hoM To~n OMinen~ en- titled ."R~U~TING AND ~E P~CING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC ~DS e~ t~ REMOVAL OF SAND, G~VEL-OR O~ER MATERIALS ~OM ~NDS UNDER TOWN'WA~RS:?. end in ~mden~ with the Res01~ion of ~e ~erd adopted et · meeting hem on ~.~.~..:--..~.~z ..... 2P.P~..'.., and In conslder~tlon of the sum of $ 200.00 p~id by Joseph M. Pagliarulo ..................... . Fishers Island ~ Y. and subject to the Terms and ~ndd~ons I,~ed on ~e revere ~Ide ~r~f, of ~hdd Town Tr~es a~horlzes and ~rmi~ ~ forcing: We~and Permit to install a 4'X 130' seasonal dock, 4'X 16' ramp and 6'X 20' float to be secured by two 6" piles, with the condition that the dock is taken out no later than November 15, in no earlier t n 3 n ~lr ~nted · ~e odgi~tlng applicati~- IN WITNESS WHER~F, ~e s~Jd ~rd of Trustees ~- by ~uses ~ O~r~t~ S~I to be M~xed, end these ~esen~ to ~ sub,bed by ~'m~l~ of t~ s~d ~rd es of th~s det~. T~tee~ TERIdS end GONDmONS Joseph M.- Pagliarulo Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD September 4, 2001 Mr. Glenn E. Just J.M.O. Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 447 Quogue, NY 11959-0447 RE: JOSEPH M. PAGLIARULO East End Rd., Fishers Island SCTM#3-3-7 Dear Mr. Just: The Board of Town Trustees took the following action during its regular meeting held on Wednesday, August 29, 2001 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, JOSEPH B. PAGLIARULO applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated July 11, 2001, and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 29, 2001, at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the structure complies with the standards set forth in Chapter 97 of the Southold Town Code, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, 2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees ap~)rove the application of JOSEPH M. PAGLIARULO to install a 4'X 130' seasonal dock, 4'X 16' ramp and 6'X 20' float to be secured by two 6" piles, with the condition that the dock is taken out no later than November 15, and put in no earlier than March 31 of each year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this determination should not be considered a determination made for any other Department or Agency, which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. Permit to construct and complete project will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon ~ompletion of said project. Fees: None Very truly yours, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees ~S DEC ACE Dept. of State i P BLIC NOTICE US Army Corps of Engineers New York District Jacob K. Javits Federal Building New York, N.Y. 10278-0090 A'FI'N: Regulatory Branch In replying rear to: Expiration Date: 2001-01056-L2 August 28, 2001 September 27, 2001 To Whom It May Concern: The New York District Corps of Engineers has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 403). APPLICANT: Joseph M. Pagliarulo 16 Barringer Road Darien, CT 06820 ACTIVITY: Pier assembly. WATERWAY: Fishers Island Sound, Long Island Sound LOCATION: Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. A detailed description and plans of the applicant's activity are enclosed to assist in your review. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historical properties, fish and wildlife values, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, consideration of property ownership and,in general the needs and welfare of the people. The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity. ALL COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE PREPARED IN WRITING AND MAILED TO REACH THIS OFFICE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE OF THIS NOTICE, otherwise, it will be presumed that there are no objections to the activity. Any person may request, in writing, before this public notice expires, that a public hearing be held to collect information necessary to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons why a public hearing should be held. It should be noted that information CENAN-OP-RE PUBLIC NOTICE NO. ~001-01056-L2 submitted by mail is considered just as carefully in the permit decision process and bears the same weight as that furnished at a public hearing. Our preliminary determination is that the activity for which authorization is sought herein is not likely to affect any Federally endangered or threatened species or their critical habitat. However, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531), the District Engineer is consulting with the appropriate Federal agency to determine the presence of and potential impacts to listed species in the project area or their critical habitat. Based upon a review of the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places, there are no known sites eligible for, or included in, the Register within the permit area. Presently unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or historical data may be lost by work accomplished under the required permit. Pursuant to Section 307 (c) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended [16 U.S.C. 1456 (c)], for activities under consideration that are located within the coastal zone of a state which has a federally approved coastal zone management program, the applicant has certified in the permit application that the activity complies with, and will be conducted in a manner that is consistent with, the approved state coastal zone management program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state's concurrence with, objection to, or waiver of the applicant's certification. No permit decision will be made until one of these actiom occur. For activities within the coastal zone of New York State, the applicant's certification and accompanying information is available from the Consistency Coordinator, New York State Department of State, Division of Coastal Resources and Waterfront Revitalization, Coastal Zone Management Program, 41 State Street, Albany, New York 12231, Telephone (518) 474-6000. Comments regarding the applicant's certification, and copies of any letters to this office commenting upon this proposal, should be so addressed. In addition to any required water quality certificate and coastal zone management program concurrence, the applicant has obtained or requested the following governmental authorization for the activity under consideration: New York State Depaxhnent of Environmental Conservation Permit Southold Town Trustees Permit It is requested that you communicate the foregoing information concerning the activity to any persons known by you to be interested and who did not receive a copy of this notice. If you have any questions concerning this application, you may contact this office at (212) 264-6730 and ask for Mary Ann Miller. For more information on New York District Co~ps of Engineers programs, visit our website at http://www.nan, usace, army. mil FOR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: Richard L. Tomer Acting Chief, Regulatory Branch Enclosures CENAN-OP-RE PUBLIC NOTICE NO. '~1-01056-L2 WORK DESCRIPTION The applicant, Joseph M. Pagliarulo, has requested Department of the Army authorization to construct a pier assembly in Fishers Island Sound, Long Island Sound at Fishers Island, Town of Southold, Suffolk County, New York. The work would involve construction of a 130 foot by 4 foot fixed timber pier, an 18 foot by 4 foot ramp, and 20 foot by 8 foot float secured by 3 pilings. The stated purpose of this project is to provide safe access the waterway and safe mooring for applicant's vessel(s). DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US. ~ ~I~$GIN~:t Ol~ ~ t-uC"/', ~ YORK JAmB ~ JA~S ~ ~ YOR~ ~Y. 1~ OFFICIAl_ BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300 SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES PO BOX 1179 SOUTHOLD NY 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Town Ha. Il, 53095 M~,in Road P.O. Box 11'79 Sovthold, Ne~v Y~xk 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL At the meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held Monday, August 20, 2001, the following recommendation was made: JOSEPH M. PAGLIARULO to install a 4'X 130' seasonal dock, 4'X .1'6' ramp and 6'X' 20' float to be secured by two 6" piles. East End Rd., Fishers Island. SCTM#3-3-7 The CAC did not make an inspection, therefore no recommendation was made. ,® t U5 Army Corps of Engineers Mew York bistrict ,Tacob K. ,Tavits Federal Building Mew York, N.Y. 10278-0090 Attn: Regulatory Branch To: District Engineer Public Notice Number: 2001-O10§6-L2 Issue Dote: August 28, 2001 Expiration Dote: S~pternber 27, 2001 Subject: ~Toseph aA. Pagliarulo 16 8arringer Ro~d Darien, CT 06820 Activity: Pier Assembly Waterway: Fishers Island Sound, Long Island Sound Location: Fishers Island, Town of 5outhold, Suffolk County, Mew York The following comments ore in response to the above applicant's proposed Pier Assembly in a port of Chocomount Cove, Fishers Island, New York. ]: am representing Mo~jeret W. 5pofford, o long time home and property owner on the Cove who feels that the construction of o 168 foot Pier anywhere in Chocomount Cove would be detrimental to the Chocomount Cove is a relatively small body of water located on the northern side of Fishers ]:sland. The porticular section of the Cove that the applicant has applied to build on, is the most scenic, protected and therefore most habitable for all forms of bird, animal and plant life. This portion also contains a strip of sandy beach which provides for recreationol swimming by the homeowners in the Cove. This part of the Cove is 50 % sand beach with the other half consisting of marsh grasses, recks, kelp seaweed and other typical saltwater growth. [t is home to o wide variety of shore birds as well as providing the right environment for shellfish, crab, mussel, and a variety of smaller foodfish. Numerous land birds and animals also thrive in the area due to its noturol vegetation and to 2 freshwater springs which are located on or very close to applicant's proposed pier site. These springs are unique to this area of the island and provide an unknown amount of ecological balance to the cove. Additionolly, from an historical and archeological view, significant evidence has shown Indian remains from either a settling or burial grounds, or both, in the vicinity of the Z freshwater springs. Research by $ohn Pfeiffer and Dr. Funk has been done on these Indian habitats and published under the title '2 Springs." The construction of a 168 foot pier into the Cove would upset the balance of all the forms of life that exist there. The pier would cut across the Cove at such an angle to rn~ke access to the beach almost impassible or at the least navigationally dangerous. It would also upset the tranquil nature that exists there now. Aesthetically, there is very little that can be said of the proposed pier. The following excerpts are cited os they relate to the considerations surrounding this project. There mc~/be others applicable but this propased action appears clearly inconsistent with these I~lYState policies. The Long ]~sland Sound Study by the EPA, presents the problems relating to Living Resources and Habitat Management os follows: "The coc~tal environs of Long ]~sland Sound represent a unique and highly Productive ecosystem with a diverse or~/of living resources, ranging from Microscopic plants and animals that drift with the currents to seaweeds and Economically important finfish, shellfish and crustaceans.]~n addition, many Other types of wildlife, such os birds, sea turtles, end marine mammals, spend All or part of their lives in the Sound, on its shores, or in its watershed. ' 'A principal human cause of harm to the Sound's living resources is water pollution, [as well as ] .,.destruction end degrodstion of habitat." ' Approximately 25-30 percent of the Souncrs tidal wetlands have been destroyed during the last century by filling, dredging and development." New York State's Coastal N~nagemant Program Policies raise concerns in similar fashion: ' Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats will be protected, preserved, and where practical, restored sa as to maintain their viability os habitats." · ]~n order the protect and preserve a significant habitat, land and water uses or development shall not be undertaken if such actions destroy or significantly impair the viability of an area as a habitat. ' 'broining...Filling,..Groding...Physical alteration of shore areas through channelization or construction of shore structure.....$uch action therefore would be inconsistent with the above policy...' [ Extracted from Policy 7] This attitude is also expressed in Policy 44: · Preserve and protect tidal and freshwater wetlands and preserve the benefits derived from these areas." In Summary: The con. ruction of a fixed pier ~il'h romp and float of 168 f~t in tota~ ~engt'h into the sm~H confines of Chocamount Cove for the ~<pre~sed purpose of ' Private Recreotiono~ Docking ' does not serve the n~eds nor the welfare of the people. In addition to the environmental concerns outlined above, safety ,navigational and water pollution issues must be considered also. Although in o somewhat sheltered area, Chocomount Cove is still subject to the furies of the typical New England, Long Island 5ound weather I~tterns. The breakup of some or all of that pier structure could cause damages and losses to both life end property in the area. The pier would also be a hazard to navigation in the cove, where pleasure sailing boots often moor overnight amongst the local commercial lobster pots. The presence of a large 168 foot pier and concomitant power boat[s] with the usual or unusual discharges of oils and gas etc., has the potential of upsetting a presently well-balanced ecosystem and as such does nat serve the total living population of tiny Chocomount Cove. In light of the above, and on behalf of all interested paPtJes, I request that this application be denied. September 21,200I 19-30 Prospect Ridge Ridgefield, Ct. 06877 203-431-6224 Olr Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Attic Foster Ken Poliwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Office Use Only Coastal Erosion Permit Application ~.~Vetland Permit Application ~"'~Major __ Minor Waiver/Amendment/Changes ~$ceived Application:.'~]l(~ /Complet~ Appli~tion ~'1'1]~ Incomplete SEQ~ Cl~sification: T~e I T~e II Unlist~~ .C~rdination:(date sent) ~AC Refe~al Sent: ~[l~ · ,'~ate of Inspection: ~' ! I ~ , ' ." '. Receipt of CAC Report: 1 J~JL '~ I . Lead Agency Determination: , - Technical Review: · ,4rfiblic Hearing Held: Resolution: NameofApplicant Joseph M. Pagliarulo Address 16 Barringer Road, Darien, CT 06820 Phone Number:( ) 203- 595 - 0158 Suffolk County Tax Map Number: 1000 - 3- 3- 7 Property Location: East End Read, Fishers Island (provide LILCO Pole #, distance to cross streets, and location) AGENT: Glenn E. Just/ J.M.O. Environmental Consulting (If applicable) Address: P.O. Box 447, Quogue, N.Y. 11959-O447 Phone: 653-0607 Board of Trustees Application GENERAL DATA Land Area (in square feet):. 4.11 acres Area Zoning: Residential R-120 Previous use of property: Intended use of property:. vacant Single family dwelling Priorpermits/approvals ~rsiteimprovements: Agency Dine Southold Town Trustees Letter of Non-Jurisdiction N.Y.S.D.E.C. Letter of Non-Jurisdiction __ No prior permits/approvals for site improvements. Has an,y~permit/approval ever been revoked or suspended by a governmental age.cy? × No Yes If yes, provide explanation: Project Description (use attachments if necessary):. Applicant proposes to install a 4'x 130: seasonal dock, and 6'x 20' float to be secured by two 6" piles. 4'x 16' ramp Board of Trustees Application WETLAND/TRUSTEE LANDS APPLICATION DATA Purpose ofthe proposed operations: Private recreational docking Area of wetlands on lot: -+ ~1~5o square feet Percent coverage of lot: ~ la-~ % Closest distance between nearest existing structure and upland edge of wetlands: _-4-~-~ feet Closest distance between nearest proposed structure and upland edge of wetlands: Q feet Does the project involve excavation or filling? × No Yes " If yes, how much material will be excavated? n / a cubic yards How much material will be filled? n / a cubic yards Depth ~ofwhich material will be removed or deposited: n/a Proposed slope throughout the area of operations: ~'.1 a_ Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: ~, \~ feet Statement of the effect, if any, on the wetlands and tidal waters of the town that may result by reason of such proposed operations (use attachments if appropriate): As proposed, project shall have no negative impacts upon waters or wetlands of the Town of Southold. Board of Trustees Application COASTAL EROSION APPLICATION DATA Purposes ofproposed activity: Private recreational docking Are wetlands present within 100 feet of the proposed activity? No x Yes Does the project involve excavation or filling? × No Yes If Yes, how much material will be excavated? 0 How much material will be filled? n / a Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: (cubic yards) (cubic yards) n/a Describe the nature and extent of the environmental impacts reasonably anticil,.~.,,t resulting from implementation ofthe project as proposed. (Use attachments if necessary) Project as proposed should not have any impacts upon the waters or wetlands of the Town of Southold nor upon coastal erosion. F~O~ : JmO CONSULTING PHONE ~0. ; 65~ 0~07 ~pr. ~4 2~]i l~:lg~bl P02 ~) Environmental Consulting Services To Whom it may concern: Please be advised that we have authorirt, d the firm of J.MO. Enviromnental Consulting Sen, ices 1o ac! as our agent on our behalf in applying for certain approvals through your agency and others involved with lhis project J M.O. Consulting Services has been retained to coordjl~ate all approvals necessary through your and other involved agencies, as well as our archite0t, engineer and eontrac(ors. We request that all contn~unieations, corr~pondetlces, n,o~ices, approvals mid calls ~c~a-d~dr¢~d directly to Phone (631) 653-0607 · Fax (631) 653-3348 121 Jessup Ave · 2nd Floor · P,O. Box 447 Quogue, New York 11959-0447 FRO~ : !nlO COHSU~TINS ~ard of Trustees Applicat£on ~pr. 04 2001 lO:iSRM PO~ ~ A~I~HORIZATION (where the applicant is not the owner) (prtnt'-~wner of p'~'op~rty) (mailing ad~ress) do hereby &uthoriEe Gl. eon E. Just/ ( Agent ) J,M,0. Environmental Oo, su]t~n~ to a~ly for perm[t{s) ~ro~ the Southol~~ Trustees o~ my behalf. ~--~ f :' ~ ,~ $- Albert J. Kl~pski, President James K/ng, V'~.Presidsnt Henry Smith A~ie Foe~er Ken Poliwoda BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 04 2081 i~:3E~M P2 Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971.0959 T~lephon$ (651) 766-1892 Fax (6~1) 765-1366 BOARD OF TRUSTEES: TOWN OF $OUTHOLD In the Matter of the Application ,O COUNTY OF SUFFOLK) STATE OF NEW YORK) being duly sworn, d~pose and say: That o~ the ~ day of ~'~, 200/, I~rso~ally~st~ the ,~ by placing the Board of Trustees or.cia1 ~ster ~here It can e~sily .~ 8een, and that I have checked to be sure ~he ~ster has remained in place for eight days prior to the date ~ ~ublic hearing. ~t~ of hearing noted thereon to ~ held .~ Sworn to before me this NOtarY Public DAVID Van3USK!RK NOTAR] UBLIC MY COMMISSIO,I EX IRES APRIL 30, 2004 F~OM : J'mO C,7I,ISIJLT[NG PHONE ~0. : 65~ 0697 Board of Truste~.s APplication County of Suffolk State of New York BEING DULY SWORN bEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT'~E/S]{~ I~ TIlE ;tPPLIC~FOR ~lE ABOV~ DESCRIBED P~RMIT(S) AND THAT ALL STAT~MF~NTS CONTAINED [IEREIN ~ TRUE ~ T~ BEST OF HIS/~ER ~LEDGE ~D BELIEF, ~D T~T ALL WORK WILL 8~ ~NE IN TH~ M~NER SET FOR~ IN T~IS APPLICATION ~ AS ~y BE APPROVED BY T~E SOU~OLD TO~ ~D OF TRUSTEES. T~E APPLIC~ AGREES TO HO~ ~E ~ OF SOU~IOLD ~ '~E D~ TRUSTEES H~LEss ~D ~EE FR~ ~y ~D ALL D~AGES AND C~IMS T ............. 2'¢~zu",,z ~Y AUTHORIZE TIlE TRUSSES a~aa au~N'~'~; Ua ~PRES~NTA~IV~S(S), TO F~TER O~ MY PROP~ ~ INSPECT ~ PRAISES IN ~NJ~CTIOR WITH RB~~iS APPLICATION. - ~ N~INE PINO NO,CRY PUBLIC OF CONNE~IC~ 7 e~?.~o SEQR APPENDIX C STATE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALrI~ REVIEW SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM for UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I--PROJECT INFORMATION ('To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Joseph M. Pagliarulo Private recreational 3 PROJECT LOCATION: Mu.~c~pa,~ Fishers Island (Southold) Cou.~ Suffolk East End Road, no #, Fishers Island Location map and survey enclosed S.C.T.M.No. 1OO0-3-3-7 dccking 5. IS OPOSED ACTION: ~l~w [] Expansion [] Mo~liflcattonleiteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Applicant proposes to install a 4'x 130' seasonal dock, 4'x 16' ramp and 6'x 20 float to be secured ~by two 6" piles. ?. AMOUNT OF LAND Initially ac~es Ultimately acres El. WI FR.JP,J;=t:U ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE ~'$1PIICTIONS? WH T IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? Single family dwellings tO. DO~ES ACTION INVOLVE A ."-~;.'IT A~-~uv'Al.. OR FUNDING NOW OR ULT MATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (Federal. State or Southold Town Trustees, N.Y.S.D.E.C.,N.Y.S.D.O.S. & U.S.D.O.A. I t. DOES ANY AS ECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VAUD PERMIT OR APPROVAL? . [] Yes ~' No If yes list agency name and permit/approval 12. AS{~ AyesRESU ~L~NoT F PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING ,'~'~.~:T/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this e;~essment OVER ' q 4-16-~?Jj95)-- 7c 617.20 Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM SEQR Purpose: The full E^F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine IsiY~nificance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full E^F is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identif~ing the range of possible impacts that may occur from a projec~t or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Adions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [:] Part I i-I Part 2 DPart 3 Upon revieW of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts I and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: i-I ^. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and,·therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because t}m mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* C. The project may result In one or more large and Important impacts that ma; have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Preparer (If'different from responsible o~'fice;i Date PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will .be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. lAME OF ACTION Proposed seasonal docking~ facility LOCATION OF ACTION (Include S~reet Address, Municipality and County) East End Road no#, Fishers Island I eUm~ESS TELEPUONE NAME OF APPUCANT/$PON~OR Glenn E. Just/ J.M.O. Environmental Consultin~o 531 )653-0607 ^OOmESS. P.O. Box 447 ... Quogue · ] BUSINESS TELEPHONE 203 )595-0158 NAME OF OWNER Of dllfe, mt) Joseph Pagliarulo ADOa~SS 16 Barringer Road crrYmo Darien STATE I ZIp COOE CT 06820 DESCRIFTtON OF ACTION Applicant proposes to install a 4'x 130' ramp and 6'x 20' float secured by two 6" seasonal dock, a 4'x lb' piles. Please Complete Each Que~tion-indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall projecL both developed ~nd undeveloped areas, 1. Present land use: D0rban I-Ilndustrlal I-ICommercial [:]Forest I'lAgriculture r'lOther 4.11 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type) I-IResldential (suburban) ~Rural (non-farm) PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres · acres acres acres acres acres _ ~ - I acres _ acres acres acres acres _ acres acres _ .. acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on pro]e~ct~site?' a. Soil drainage: '~Well drained 1 u u % of site (:]Moderately well drained , % of site ' C]Poorly drained . % of site b. if any agricultural land Is Involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group I through 4 of the NYS Land Classification 5ystemt' acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcropplAgs on project slte) I-lYes ~No a. What is depth to bedrock! 600 (in feet) 2 5.' ^ppro:imate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: ~0-10% ]- 00 % O10-15% % EllS% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-lYes l~No 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? [:]Yes ~No ~3. What is the depth of the water table? ~ (in feet) 9. Is site located over a prin~ary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~l~Yes I-INo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the proje'(~t area? RYes [~No 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? C]Yes [~No According to seJ_~ identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) I-lYes ]~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neigl~borhood as an open space dr recreation area? I-lyes [~o . If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? I-lYes ~S~qo un-named freshwater wetlands 15. Streams within or contiguous to projec~ area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary F±shers Island Sound 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name n/~, b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ~l~Yes I-INo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow Connection? [3Yes [=]No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? l-lYes I-1No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 2.5-AA, Section 303 and 304? aYes 19. h: the site located in or substantially contiguous to a. Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~Yes I-INo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastefi' I-lyes ~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 4. [ 1 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: n / a acre's initially; n / a acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain unde~eloaped n/a acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. 'If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed n/a %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing n/a ; proposed n/a n/a g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour · (upon'completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially o n e one Ultimately I, Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure ~ 6 ~ height; 4 ' , w.l~dth; 130 ' length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy Is~'~ ft. 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? ~ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONo ~N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being r~cla~med? b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? C]Yes OHo 4. Hov~ many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed'~rom site? acres. 5. Will any matur,.~.f, orest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction ~L/:Z months, including demolition). 7. If multi-phaseO:/a a. Total number of phases anticipated . (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase .1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase, month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes ~o 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction ~t .; after project is complete ,'~ .10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~0 ... 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? [:]Yes J~lo If yes, explain '12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [:]Yes I~No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged .13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ~No Type '14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain )[)Yes 15. Is project or any portion of project located In a 100 year flood plain? OYes' ~No CINo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ' C]Yes a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing ·solid waste facility be used? OYes C]No · ,.; location c. If yes, give name · d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain .17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? (:lYes ~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? [3Yes 'l~No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes ~No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levelsl' OYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use/ OYes ~]No If yes , indicate type(s) . 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity _ n / a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day · gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes ~No if Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: City. Town, Village Board I~Yes DNo City. Town, Village Planning Board DYes DNo City. Town Zoning Board I~lYes I-INo City, County Health Department C]Yes Other Local Agencies DYes DNo Other Regional Agencies ' ~Yes DNo State Agencies ~Yes I-1No Federal Agencies l~Yes DNo C. Zoning and Planning Information Type Southold Town Trust~s NYSDOS 7/01 NYSDEC 7/01 USDOA 7/01 Submittal Dale .7/01 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? OYes ' If Yes, indicate decision required: Dzoning amendment I-tzoning variance Clspecial use permit Dsubdivision Dsite plan Dnew/revision of master plan Dresource management plan Dother g-120 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? saff~e 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? n/a 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? same 6. is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/~ mile radius of proposed action? R-120 ONo B. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ',4 mile? ~l~Yes [=]No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land~ how many lots are proposed? n/a a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? DYes ~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? DYes l~No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lyes DNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels~ DYes' ~No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~Yes [3No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. F_ Veriflcation,~ ~ ~ ,certify that tl~ ,n[o~nat~n~.p~ovi ~/~. ove is true to the best of my knowledge. Applican~nsor ~ame Ih,~ E. Just as agen~ Date 7/17/Q1 ~ - Signature /~ I/~A T~en~ ~ If Ihe action is In the Coastal Area,~d you are a state agent, complete the Coaslal Assessment Form before proceed~ g with this ~mment. 5 Part 2--PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility o[ Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) · In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonab[e't The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. · The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. · The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. · The number o[~ examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. · In identifying impacts, cgnsider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) . a. Answer each of the 20 questions' In PART 2. Answer Yes If there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c, If answering Yes to a question then chock the appropriate box (column I or 2) to Indicate the potential size of the Impact. If Impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If Impact will occur but threshold Is lower than example, check column 1. d. Iden{lfylng that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that It is also necessarily significant. Any large Impact must be evaluated In PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impaot In column 2 simply asks that It be looked at further. e. If reviewer has doubt about size of the Impact then consider the Impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. f. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) In the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box In column 3. A.No response Indicates that such a reduotlon Is not possible. This must be explained In Part 3. IMPACT ON LAND 1. will the proposed action result in a physical change t.o the project site? ONO ~]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Any construction on slopes of 1S% or greater. (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. · Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. · Construction of paved perking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. · Construction on land wb~re bedrock is exposed or generallywithin 3 feet of existing ground surface. · Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one phase or stage. · Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. · Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. · Construction in a designated floodway. · Other impacts 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the sltei' (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)ONO OYES · Specific land forms:. 1 2 3 Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [-I [] [::]Yes ["'INo [~ [] i-]Yes [:]No [] I--] i-]Yes [~]No [] [-] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes []No [:] [~ [:]Yes [:]No [] [] [~]Yes [~No [] [] [:]Yes [~]No [] .[:] [:]Yes [:]No [] [] [-]Yes [:]No IMPACT ON WATER 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? (Under Articles 15, 24.2S of the Environmental Conservation Law. ECL) ONO C]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Developable area of site contains a protected water body. · Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. · Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. · Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. · Other impacts: 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? OHO ' RYES Example~ that would apply to column 2' · A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. · Construction of a body o.f water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. · Other impacts: S. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? nNo nYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. · Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not have approval to serve proposed (project) action. · Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. · Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water supply system. · Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. · Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the slte to facilities which presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity. · Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per day. · Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. · Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons. · Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water and/or sewer services. · Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. · Other impacts: 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water runoff? r'lNO OYES Example~ that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would change flood water flows. 7 I 2 I 3 Small to PotentialI Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes I'-INo [] n []Yes nNo [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes [:]No [] [] []Yes E]No [] [] []Yes FINo n [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] nYes nNo [] [~ []Yes [] [] []Yes [] O []Yes [-]No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] []Yes []No [] [] I-lYes []~o I-1 [] I-lyes []t~o I-1 [] []Yes I-3~o · Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. · Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. · Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality~' nNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will induce 1o000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. · Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than I ton of refuse per hour. · Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed S lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than.lO million BTU's per hour. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed to industrial use. · Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species~' I-INO ByES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list. using the site, over or near site or found on the site. · Removal of any portion of a critical or significant ~ildlife habitat. · Applica~ion of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other than for agricultural purposes. · O(her impacts: 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species~' [:]NO I-lyES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. · Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources~' nNO [:]YES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture~ vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 I 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O' OYes ONo [] O OYes . ONo ' O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo · O O OYes ONo O O. OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O 0 OYes OHo [] [] OYes [~]No · Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of agricultural land. · The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District. more than 2.S acres of agricultural land. · The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) · Other impacts: IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11. Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources~' mN• [3YES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from or in sharp contras~ to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. · Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. · Project components that will result in the elimination or significant screening of scenic views I(nown to be important to the area. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTDRIC AND ARCHAEOLO~IICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of hist•dc, pre- historic or paleontological importanceS' ON• I~Y£S Examples that would apply to column 2 · ProPOSed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. · Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. · Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunitlesi' E~camples that would apply to column 2 I"INO OYES · The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. · A major reduction of an open space Important to the community. · Other Impacts: 9 1 2 3--- Small to Potential Can Impact f Moderate Large Mitigated B,. Impact Impact Project Chan! [] [] OYes []N [] [] []Yes []N [] [] []Yes ON [] [] OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] O OYes ON O O OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] [] OYes ON [] O OYes 0~ O O OYe~ O~ 0 0 OYes O~ IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS 14. will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique character- istics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established pursuant to subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.14(g) ? ON• OYES List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of the CE'A Examples that would apply to column ? · Proposed Action to locate within the CEA? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the resource? · Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the resource? · Proposed Action will impact the use. function or enjoyment of the resource? · Other impacts: IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? · ON• OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goOds. · Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON ENERGY 16 Will proposed action affect the community's sources ot fuel or ONO gYES energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in th~ use of any form of energy in the municipality. · Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a maior commercial o¢ iodustrial use. · Other impacts: 10 1 Small to Moderate Impact [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] 2 Potential Large Impact [] [] [] [] [] [] O [] 3 Can Impact Be Mitigated By Project Change []Yes ON• OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes ON• OYes •No OYes ON• OYes •No []Yes ON• []Yes •No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action.;' [:]NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. · Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). · Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. · Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. · Other impacts: IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 18.. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety[' DNO 'DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic Iow level discharge or emission. * Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) · Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural gas or other flammable liquids. * Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance within 2,000 fe~t of a site used for the disposal of solid o[ hazardous waste. · Other impact~: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARAI~TER OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD 19. Will proposed action af fact the cheracter of the existing community? F'INO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 · The permanent population of the city, tOWn or village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. · The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. · Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. · Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. · Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures or areas of historic importance to the community. · Development will create a demand for additional community services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) · Proposed Action will set an important precedent for futura'projects. · Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. · Other impacts: 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change O O OYes []No O [] []Yes []No [] O OYes ONo [] O OYes ONo O O OYes ONO [] O OYes []No [] [] OYes ONo O O OYes ONo O [] OYes ON0 [] [] []Yes ONo O [] []Yes ONo [] [] OYes •No [-I O OYes ONo I'q [] OYes nNo · O [] []Yes ONo [] O OYes []No O [] []Yes []No O [] OYes ONo O [] OYes ONo 20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impactS[' [:3NO DYES II In)' action In Part 2 Is Identified al · p~tentlal large Impact or II you cannot determine the magnitude of Impact. proceed to Part 3 11 Part 3reEVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impaCt[S) is considered to be potenlially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3.' Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: · The probability of the impact occurring · The duration of the impact · Its i~;reversibility, including permanently lost resources of value · Whether the impact can or will be controlled · The regional consequence of the impact · Its potential divergence from local needs and goals · Wl~ether known objections to the'project relate to this impact. ' (Continue on attachments) 12 ~,,,~.,, <~,~_~= 6 ] 7.20 S EQ IR Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form .may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility 1. Would the project be visible from: · A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man.made scenic qualities? · An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public observation, enjoyment and appreciatibn of natural or man-made scenic qualities'? · ^ site or structure listed on the Hatlonal or State Registers of Historic Places? · State Parks? · The State Forest Preserve? · National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? · National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding natural features? · National Park Service lands? · Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic or Recreational? · Any transportation corridor of high expos3xre, such as part of the Interstate System, or.Amtrak? · A governmentally established or designated Interstate or Inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? · A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as scenic? · f4unlclpal park, or designated open space'? · County road? · State? · Local road? Project and Resource (in Miles) 0-~/~ V~ -I/2 V2-3 3-5 5+ [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] 0 O' [] [] [] 0 [] [] 0 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] 0 [] [] 0 [] [] O [] [] [] O O O D [] [] [] [] [] [] 0 [] [] 0 [] [] [] 0 [] 0 0 [] O [] [] 0 0 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened b3/summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) nYes OHo .3. Are any of the resources checked in question I used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? COVes O1% DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the environment. Within surrounding Essentially undeveloped [] [] Forested Agricultural [] [] Suburban residential [] [] Industrial [] [] Commercial [] [] Urban [] [] River, Lake, Pond [] [] Cliffs, Overlooks [] [] [] [] Designated Open Space [] [] Fiat [] [] Mountainous [] [] Other [] [] NOTE: add attachmentS as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: *V2 mile [-]Yes []Ho °] miles []Yes []No '2 miles ~]Yes []Ho °3 miles i-lYes []Ho ° Distance from project site are provided [or assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity In which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is Activity Travel to and from work Involved In recreational activities Routine travel by residents At a residence At worksite Other FREQQEHCY Holidays/ Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 2 NOTICE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER BOARD OF TRUSTEESt TOWN OF SOUTHOLn In the matter of applicant: SCTM#1000- 3-3-7 YOU ARE HEREBY GIVEN NOTICE: 1. That it is the intention of the undersigned to ,,'quest a Permit from the Board of Trustees to: install a 4'x 130' seasonal dock, 4'x 16' ramp and 6'x 20' float with two 6" piles. 2. That the property which is the subject of Envir~n.,~ntal Review~s located adjacent to your property and is ,~'~cribed as follows: East End road no#, Fishers Island 3. That the project which is'subject to Environmen~n.] Revlew under Chapters 32, 37, or 97 of the Town Code is open to public comment on:call office You may contact the Trustees ~)ffice at 765-1892 or in writing. The above referenced proposal is under review of th~ ;{~ard of Trustees of the Town of Southold and does not referen~-~ any other~ agency that might have to review same proposal. OWNERS NAME:Joseph Pa~liarulo MAILING ADDRESS:c/o J.M.0. C0ns%ltin~ P.O. Box 447, Quo~ue N.Y 11959-0447 PHONE #: 31-653-0607 Enc.: Copy of sketch or plan showing proposal for you~~ convenience. Name: PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ~mTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Address: U.S. Postal Serwce CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT .r,- Clerk: KW~S~d 07/12/01 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~?/~tJ( ~£4- , residing at 17-~ ~ ~ I* (~3CD ~_~_ ~ ~ ~ , ~ing duly sworn~ deposes and says that on th~ I~y df 0~[~ ,~, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set f~ in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of the above n~ed persons at the addresses set opposite there respective n~es; that the addresses set opposite the n~es of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Not.es were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~O~lt ~ that said Notices ........ : .... ified) (registered) ~1.1~: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Receiv~ by e Print Cl~rly}~B. Date of Delive~ item 4 if Restricted Delive~ is desired. ~ ~/ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. ~ Agent Affach this card to the back of the mailpiece, ~ Addressee or on the front if space permits. D. is deliv~ addm~ different item 1 ? 0 Yes If YES, enter delive~ address below: ~ NO 102595-99 I~ 1789 PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt Name: PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE aTTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Address. o U.S. Postal Se,'wce CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ru ID: 0959 2.10 1.50 Postmark Here Clerk: KWKG6M 3.94 07/12/01 FU Narn~, (P ease Prlnt ear y) (To omplete by lied m ................... STATE OF NEW 'fORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK I' ('9t_.,¢~ ~/,/.JL , Y~ L~ , _b_e~_ing duly swornTM, deposes and says that on th~ ~7.--~y oil ,ILL[\~ ,~DOI, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice se~ fo~t~ in the B-~-~rd of Trustees Application, directed to each of The above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the n~nes of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Not. es were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~L~J~ , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons ~y (certified) (registered) COAIt~LETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERy A. Received by (P/ease Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery o_Z-14- I D. Is delivery address different from ~tem 1 ? [] Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: [] NO 3. Serv,ce Type / "-' I-I Cedif,ed Mail r~ Express Mail [] Registered ~-~ Return Receipt for Merchandise ~] Insured Marl [] C.O.D. S-r:N-mER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also Complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. · Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. · Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Adicle Addressed to: 2. Arbcle Number I~ Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [] Yes PS Form ~8'1 ~, July ~ ~ Domestic Return Receipt 102595-99.M. 1789 Name: PROOF OF MAILING OF NOTICE ATTACH CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPTS Address: U.S. Pogta~ Selmce CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT r~ 'ro~l Po~s. & v~.~ 07/12/01 rtl STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ~/,~ C~£~ , residing at ~ ~I-~D AI3-~_ (: (~¢3 ~x_~_ . {% L~ , ~e~_ing duly sworn~ deposes and save that on th~ J'7.-"~lV'd'~.¥ df ~,J %L[\~ ,~Z)O~, deponent mailed a true copy of the Notice set fo~t~ in the Board of Trustees Application, directed to each of [he above named persons at the addresses set opposite there respective names; that the addresses set opposite the names of said persons are the address of said persons as shown on the current assessment roll of the Town of Southold; that said Not.es were mailed at the United States Post Office at ~0~bU~ , that said Notices were mailed to each of said persons ~y (certified) (registered) ~:~": COMPLETE THIS SECTION · Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Aisc CompJete item 4 if Restricted Defivery is desired. Print your name and address o~1 the reverse so that we can return the Card to you. Attach this card to the back of the mail iece, or on t?_~e front if space permits. P Arhcle Addressed to: Form 3811, July Dornestlc Return Receipt ~v Q No Registered [~ Return ¢~ll~mip~,~ Merchandise Insu~ Mint ~ C.O.D. z2o c /o jq& 102595-99 M-I 7Rn (10" WATER WATER SERVICE SHUTOFF McCOMB & SUSAN DUNWOODY (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) MUNICIPAL WATER & ON SITE SEPTIC lc 82'58'52'' CD S 64'43'06' W LC 113.30' I I iI -- ! APPROXIMATE LOCATION WATER SERVICE POLE FOUNDATION LOCATION 10/29/00 / APPROXIMATE LOCATION UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TEL. CD S 04'50'15" W L =199.55' LC 196,15' COASTAL EROSION HAZARD LINE 44 FI OF 49 iRON PIN (FNO) , ,-% 'SEPTIC TANK. \ JJ L /' 'J'J' · BOX \'~ ~ ~ POLE L~CHING X ~ ~ N/F · ~- ' -~ "" THATCHER ~LIMITS OF 100 YR. BASE FLOOD ~-~PER FIRM PANEL 38 OF t026 MAP #36103C0038 G MAY 4, 1998 PIPE 91.51 W 1668,40 38.5' 11' 53' PAGLIARULO_FI_ASBUtLT, DWG ~Jd M 0,600o'¢ LOCATION MAP 1. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY TRIANGULATION STATION "CHOCOMOUNT 2". 2. SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, DISTRICT 1000, SECTION 00,3, BLOCK 3, LOT 7. 3. SITE IS TO BE SERVICED BY MUNICIPAL WATER AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 4, SITE iS IN R-120 'ZONE. 5. TOTAL AREA = 4,11~c ACRES, 6. BASE FOR LEVELS N,G.V.D. 1929 (APPROX.) 7, SITE pLAN REFERENCE; SiTE PLAN PREPARED FOR THE ESTATE OF ROGER S. FIRESTONE, BLOCK 19 LOT lA & PORTION OF BLOCK 19 LOT 2, FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK, CHANDLER, PALMER & KING~ NORWICH, CONNECTICUT, SCALE: 1"=40', DATE: AUGUST .30, 1994, REVISIONS TO dAN, 3, 1997. 8, UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO A SURVEY MAP BEARING A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR'S SEAL IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209, SUBDIVISION 2, OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAw. 9. A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT A PROPER APPLICATION OF THE SURVEYOR'S EMBOSSED SEAL SHOULD BE ASSUMED TO BE AN UNAUTHORIZED COPY. 10, OWNER: JOSEPH PAGUARULO 16 BARRINDER ROAD Dorien, Ct, 06820 (20~)968-1445 N/F NOW OR FORMERLY MIN. MINIMUM FND, FOUND R= RADIUS APPROX. APPROXIMATE ~ BUILDING SETBACK LINE 40 20 0 40 ~RAPHIC SCALE IN FEET REVISIONS DATE I , DESCR~PTtON 05/'11/'011 ADDI,~ONS & REVISION Q6/25/oi I ^DDI~ONS 07/,02/01 [ REVI~,O~, , DATE:, OCTOBER 30, 2000 SCA~: 1"= ~' FINAL LOCATION PLAN PREPARED FOR dOSEPH PAGLIARULO BLOCK 19 -- LOT #lA & PORTION LOT #2 FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK