Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutScarmato, AnthonyPage 3 FIVE (5) MINUTES OR LESS, IF POSSIBLE 1, J. Kevi~ McLaughlin on bob, aK of ANTHONY SCARMATO requests a Public I-fearing in the matter of a V, i0~n! ,i~r a ohaln link fence down into water seaward of high var~ mark. Located: 235 Hucldehelry Hill Rb~l~:,F. as~ Marion. SCTIV~31-16-9. TR/j~'i'~ R!I. tI. PSKI: I, there anyone here who would like to speakS. KEVIN MCLAIJGHLIN: I'm here on behalf of Mr. ScarmaW, my client has been served with a notice of vtolat~n cbn.cer~ng a fence that was constructed appwx: 25 yoarsago, which everyone has admitted he obtaified all.of the.necessary permits at that tlrae to erect. Basically he has done nothing with the fence since then l~hi¢l~st.,stopped there. How the violation that he is served with is violation #Sec. 9720 of the code v,.¥;"'.,... '" I' . .' .,' shall ~ductloperatlons on any wetlands in the Town:of Southold uuless he first rh.:.'~, i', r '~.'..' 9713 ~the Code defines the w0rd "operafions" and l seut you a letter to this effect aad ll0peih!ly Y~u have all had,a,chance to read it. But the definition says that "Operations are removal of mate~s If~om tvettands, deposited on wetlands, the erection, construction, alteration, or enlargements of any ba/ldt~g, dl~q ipier, wharf; bulkhead, jetty, groin or other structure temporary or permanent on wedand}' My pmiti0n is ,~xyl simple, we are i~ot conducting any Operations on the wetls~is. The fence was b~,ilt 25 years ago, ~ fenice ~ns. To now try to say that we are in violation of this section of the Code is ludierous. We,re not do~ anything. We haven't done anything in 25 years. Under this logic, if you had a house, let's say~ tliat wits'75ifeet back and didn't need any kind of permits, and you lost 15 feet of Beacb~out due to a storm, tBe~uso is noWffiegal, and yb'uki.be certain to notice some violation. This is not the way the Code is si~i~:~5~ dli-efit ha~'ct6ne nothing,"/i~dlheref6r~'I see absolutdy fie reason hob-lie-dan be alleged to be in violation mVthe'Code since he has don, riothing under'the definition of the operations as listed in the Code. I got some.:pictures,hat I would like to mb. mit, most of which are the neighborhood around where the fence is located, I;know some of you were there, we met at the site, some month or six weeks ago, and I t~hinlr if you remember Being there and if you look at the pictures, there was some discussion at the site oft his be/rig an obstn!aion~ and' I would agree that.certainly in some sense of the word that is an obstruction but there have to Be six or eight obstructions right in'the pictures of this property. There are groins going out, there are cement piers l~ohig :Out:, there are fences going out, and I think if you take a look at all of these pictures you'll see that all'of*hlngs :are ~bstructiom, all of which may or may not have permits, I'm not aware, all I know is that my client'i fence had a permit when it was built. The last two pictures I would like to submit to this Board are pida~res of~ fete th,t Cedar Beach running down to the water similarly to what my client's now does due to beach erosion., t would like to submit these to the Board. TRUS,TEE"Ki~UPSKI: Thank you. There is some question about a Building Permit. I think when we met in the'field, you showed us a Building Permit for a chain-linked fence? KEVIN MCLAUGHHN: Yes, I have a copy ortho ..... a Building Permit was issued in 1973 to erect a 6 foot high chain-linked fence, that is my only copy, and I would be happy to submit a copy to the Board, tomorrow, I can drop one off. TRUSTEE Y,,RUPSKI: We would appreciate that. KEVIN MCLAUC:ff-ILIN: Now I understand there are no operations presently being conducted nor have been conducted for 25 years and therefore with all due respect I submit this Board has no jurisdiction. TRUSTEE FOSTER: Can we look at ih,_*_ permit? Can we make a copy of it now? KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN: Sure. TRUSTEE FOSTIil~ OK. KEV'IN MCLAUGHLIN: If anyone has any questions I would be happy to.answer them. TRUS'I-Ie. li KRUPSKI: 'The main thing, we wanted to take a look at that Building Permit, that question that I had and the other Board members ... Are there any other comments? Yes. · fiT, MURPHY:,.; I live at 2165 Bay Ave. in East Marion, about two houses in from the bay. On Memorial Day weekend, it was my child, I was the one who issued the complaint who went underneath the dock and who got Page 4 caught around that fence that was well into the water past the high-water mark, and speaking to the people regarding the coastal rights in the State of New York. I have an excopt from the Newsday, it's in the Newsday for the past couple of weeks now, that in New York, it is every citizen's birthright and in theory it means that the lowliest peon is entitled to walk on the beach in front of the wealthiest millionaire's oceanfront land house. So that fence is blocking my access to walk along the beach, and it is blocking my access and that is how my child got caught-up under the fence. There is another dock that's falling down fight nex~ to that adjacent piece of property and if everyone has access in the State of New York to walk freely in the water and on the beach and the high-water mark down, then how can that fence be allowed to r~aln there, aI our access. In that neighborhood there are predominat¢ly elderly people or people who have children. IfI want to take a walk along the beach with my children I want them ??? to that fence or anything else. The other groins and the piers that go out, any one can walk over them in that area. This poses a threat to anyone who wants to walk freely along the beach with their family members. I gave you a copy of all the photos I have regarding that and how far that goe~ into the water and we did discuss that. TRUS'fI~I~ KRUPSKI: Thank yov, Would anyone else like to speak on this matter? Does the Board have any comments? TRUSTI~ KING: I'll make a motion to dose the hearing. TRUSTEE SMITH: Seconded. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: No other comments? ALL AYES. 2. Proper-T Services on behalf ofRENEE PONCET requests a Wetland Permit to construct a single-family dv~elrmg'~fld-~c· ~stem~ LOcaied: 7Cr2~ig~n~ r_,ane, C-reenport. SCTM #34-5-2U.-- TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor oftha application? JIM FITZGERALrI: ,I don't have anything to add to the material in the application but I would be happy to answer any qun~tions. TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Is there anyone here who would like to make any other comments on this application in favor or against the application. NEIGHBOR: I'll be thek.nelghbor and I've seen the plans and met thc couple and the property is the last lot in the .subdivision, that started 30 years ago, I am here to listen in keeping with the things thnt we would lik~ to ~ TRUSTEE KRUPSKI: Thank you. Do we have any notes from the field inspection? I think the only thing, there is no CAC comments here. I think we wanted a non-tuff'buffer to the 10' contour. Ifthe applicant wants to clear her view, which I assungd he would, he should'appeal to us in writing and show us what he wants afterwards, lqon-turfmeans that he can put landscaping in front. IIM F1TZOER2,I.D: May I make a comment on that? I gave you some months an article, I think it was published'by the Cooperative Extension Service, and the poini of the article was that well-maLm_~i~ed groin was a better deterrent to bad !htn~s going in water than a non-tort'buffer. TRUSr~.,. KRUPSKI: AcO~lly I did read that and I do remember it, having an agricultural background and a degree in plato science, I find that article to be an over-simplification and sort of a real generic One-sided, sort cfa'little slice of the whole picture and I didn't quite agree with the way it worded. I think in the long nm as far as propen'y maintenance goes, I think the non-turf buffer is the safest bet towards keeping nutrients entering the ~reek. and like I said,'they can landscape it, and clear for a view. I did not agree with that article. Cra~ng) FRANCINE PRATO: I have a question, I 'ma neighbor there too. Can you just define to me a "non-tuff buffer". TRUS'r~/,E KRUPSKI: Well, some of the problems with turf going all the way to the water is that the nm-off would naturally flow much quicker to the water, of course, this property, most waterffonI properties are rmturally graded towards the water. So anything that you put on the low end is going to run, on heavy rains, directly into the creek. If you put in the non-turf buffer, you can put in plantings, flowing, non-flowing, native grasses, and all kinds of things you can put in that will slow the water coming down and you won't get that quick flush in heavy in rain of nutrients or whatever is put on the lawn. CASE NUMBER CASE DESCRIPTION INCIDENT REPORT Southold Town Police Department Route 25 Pece~ic, New York 11958 516-765-2600 [] CRIMINAL CASE ~NON CRIMINAL .AGE ! oF I TO HRB ESK OFFICER . PATROL OFFICER INCIDENT LOCATION II,'IZ NBR STREET NAME [] PUBUC BLDG. [] SCHCOL [] COUNTRY CLUBIGROUNOS [] PUBUCPARK [] SANK D OTHER C - COMPLAINANT F - FINDER D - DRIVER I - INJURED I AIDED E - EMPLOYEE J - JUVENILE M - MISSING PERSON R - REPORTING PERSON V - VICTIM O - OWNER S - SUSPECT W - WITNESS P - POMCE OFFICER U - UNKNOWN Z - OTHER LAST NAME HOME PHONE RACE CODES A- ASIAN!ORIENTAL B - BLACK LAST NAME HOME PHONE FIRST MI HOME PHONE COMPLEXION 0 - OTHER W - WHITE HGT OCCUPATION EYES HAIR COMPLEXION ADDRESS O PDTS-1 A NOTICE Police Dept. - Bay Constable Town of Southold Peconic, New York 11958 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Julu 8 98 Date: .................. , 19 ..... ~nthonv Scar~ato To: ....... 7~L~-~-;Rr~X~iiX~-;~XXU-X~-2L~X~V ....................... POB 725 235 Huckleberr-7 Hill Ed., East Marion,>;.Y. 11939 Address:---~XS~-~-~-5~-~5~5~-~5~-~-~5~ ............ Please take notice there exists a violation of .the Code of the II 20 Town of Southold, Chapter 97 Article ............ Section .............. you have no Trustee at premises hereinafter described in that--= .......................... Permit for fence. You are therefore directed and ordered to copply with the Aoolv for a Trustee Permit for chainlink fence within following: .......................... ~ .................................. 75 feet of wetlands. If Permit is denied fence to be removed to the 91ean High Tide Line. 20 July 98 on or before ........... day of ..... J .......... , 19 ....... The premises to which this Notice of Violation refers are situated at: ....... _23_5_ _kiu_c_k_l_e_b_e_r_r x_L _H_i_l_l_ 3_d_.~_ _E_a_s_t_ ~_a_r~_o_n ........ ir own o f S o u t ho 1 d, Suffolk County, N'.~. (Suff. County %'ax bIap Designation: Dist. 1000 Section:---~-------Block:--~ .... Lot:__~____k Failure to comply with the applicable provisions of the law may constitute an offense punishable by fine or imprison~nent or both. NOTICE: You have the right to apply for a hearing before the Board of Trustees of the Town of Southold, provided that you file a written request with the Clerk of the Trustees within 10 days after service of the Notice of Violation. Such request shall have annexed thereto a copy of the Notice of Violation upon which a Hearing is requested and shall set forth the reasons why such notice of violation should be modified or rescinded.. - ·''- _ '" Ba ~~ ld, NY AT lrN-CONSULTANTS INC. 1329 NORTH SEA RD. SOUTHAMPTON N. Y. li96'~ 516-283-6360 Albert J. Krupski, President James King, Vice-President Henry Smith Artie Foster Ken Po[iwoda Town Hall 53095 Route 25 P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971-0959 Telephone (631) 765-1892 Fax (631) 765-1366 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 20, 2000 Mr. Anthony Scarmato 235 Huckleberry Hill Rd. P.O. Box 725 East Marion, NY 11939 RE: 235 Huckleberry Hill Rd. East Marion, SCTM#31-16-9 Dear Mr. Scarmato: The Trustees have reviewed the survey dated September 28, 1972 and determined that your proposal to enclose the existing porch to be out of the Wetland jurisidiction, under Chapter 97 of the . Town Wetland Code. However, any activity within 100' of the Wetland line would require permits from this office. The Southold Town Board of Trustees recommend that the chain-link fence be removed immediately, from below the mean high water mark. This determination is not a determination from any other agency. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK:lms Board Of Southold' Town Trustees SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK PERMIT NO. 4g33 DATE: ... 9/30/93 ISSUED TO .. Ai~TH0.NY..SCAI~MATO Pursuant fo the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and the REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with fha Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on 9/30/93 19 93, and in consideration of the sum of $ 250.00 paid by Anthony Sgarma.tg. . . of. Eas.t mario~ N.Y. and subject fo the Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, of Soufhold Town Trustees authorizes end permits the following: Replace 124 1.f. of timber wall within 18", repair inplace 73 1.f. of easterly return, Approx. 100 c.y. of fill, 4' X 4' platforn 4' wide steps from retaining wall to beach. all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees here- by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and these presents to be subscribed by a majority of the said Board es of this date. Trustees TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer. III, President Albert J. K_mpski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G, Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 September 30, 1993 En-Consultants Inc. 1329 North Sea Road Southampton NY 11968 Re: Anthony Scarmato SCTM #31-16-9 Dear Mr. Haje, The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on September 30, 1993 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, ANTHONY SCARMATO applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated June 7, 1993 and, WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on Thursday, Septeraber 30, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW THEREFORE BE IT, RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of ANTHONY SCARMATO to replace 124 1.f. of timber wall within 18". Repair inplace 73 1.f. of easterly return. Approx. 100 c.y. of clean fill will be trucked in from upland source. Construct a 4' X 4' platform, 4' wide steps from proposed retaining wall to beach. Located Huckelberry Hill Road, East Marion. Permit will expire two years from the date it is sighed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: Fees: uly yours, Br~d~~ President, Board of Trustees JMB/djh cc. CAC TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, President Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-I823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road PO. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1000-31-16-9 NAME: Anthony Scarmato DATE: August 26, 1993 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type I. DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to replace 124 1.f. of timber wall inkind/inplace. Repair in place 73 1.f. of easterly return. Approx. 100 c.y. of clean fill will be trucked in from upland source. Construct a 4' X 4' platform, 4' wide steps from proposed retaining wall to beach. Located Huckelberry Hill Road, East Marion. LOCATION: SCTM #1000-31-16-9 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DRT~a{~INATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the following mitigation measures be implemented. cc: CAC Prepared by Project Sponsor t NOTICE: T, his doEument is designed to assist in determining whether the action propc~~~;~t.,'i~'~t ~.{~ect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers t~~.~s ~'~ll ~ co'sit'red as part of the application for approval and may be subiect to further verification and pu~;review. Provide any addibonal information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currentlv available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specifv each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, Municipahty and County) NAME OF APPLiCANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS CITY/PO EN'CONSULTANTS INC. I~ NO~TH _~. P.D, SOUTHAMPTON N, Y. 11968 ~1~-z1~3-6360 BUSINESS TELEPHONE STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION BUSINESS TELEPHONE / ~ ~ ?~/'~ - I STATE !1 ZIP CODE Replace (within 45") 124 1.f. of timber retaining wall. Repair in place 73 1.f. of easterly return. Approxi- mately 100 cy of clean fill will be trucked in from upland source. Construct a 4'x 4' platform, 4~ wide steps from propD~W retaining wall to beach. D~stance between new and old retaining walls is necessitated by presenc~ of improvemen~s such a~ fish pond located close behind ~xi~ting wall which w~11 not allow tie back system to extend very far landward. To compensate, new wall will be 4~ out so a 10' tie rod and deadman system can be Please Complete Each Questi utilized to afford adequate lateral stability. A. Site Description Phvs~cal setting of o~eraH prolect, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present [and u~e =Urban --Industrial _-Commeroal ~Forest ~Agnculture ~Other 2. Total acreage of prolect area. t acres APPROXP4ATE &CREAGE Meado~ or Brush[and (Non-agnculturali Forested Agricultural (includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.~ Wetland [Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24 25 of ECL) Water Surface &rea Unvegetated (Rock. earth or fi(Il Roads. buddings and other paved surfaces Other (Indicate type/ ~. What is predominant soil type(s) on project s~te? a. Soil dra~nase. ~Well dra,ned /(J~J % or ~(e ~Residentlal (suburbanl --_Rural inon-rarm~ PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acreb · I acres .I acres acres acres acres acres acre~ acres acres acres '~ acres ~Moderately well drained % of s~te ~Poorly drained % ~r b. If anvagr~culturallandisinvolved~'how man~ acre~ r ,oil areclass~fiedw~thinsoilgroupl through4of theN'~S Land Class~flcauon System? ~1[ ~, acres ,'S~e: ',,CRR 3701 ~re there bedrock z, utcropp,ngs on pro?~;t~slte' .~,h,-:: - ! :"~ ':, '¢drock~ 5. Approximate percentage of proposed p~ectsite with slopes: ~]0-10% ~ % ~10-15% ~'~ % 1-115% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? [qYes 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Re§ister of National Natural Landmarks? I--lYes ~]No 8. What is the depth of the water table? ~ (in feet) (::/< ~,~/¢ $,/'~',,~ 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ~]Yes [:]No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ~]Yes l-lNg 11. Does project site contain any species of plant o['~nimai/life/t~t, is identified as threatened or endangered? I-lYes llaNo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual rand forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) F-lYes [~NO Describe 13. Is the project s~te presently used by the corrl~_nity or.,-neigi]bo~;)ad ~l.% ~[~ open space or recreation area? ~]Yes ~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present s~te include scenic views known to be important to the community? []Yes "~No 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name ot Stream and name of River to which it is tributary .. 16 Lakes. ponds, wedand,,a,~as w,thln/or c~?.~tlgu~Js to prolect area: a. Name ~--~r',~',~ '/~ /'~'c~-/,,?~ b. Size (In acres) 17 Is the site served b,,' existing public utilities? [-]Yes a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity ex~st to allow connecbon`' ~Yes ~No b) If Yes, will ~mprovements be necessary to allow connection? E:]Yes ~No 18. Is the site located m an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agr;culture and Markets Law. Article 25 AA Section 303 and 304,' ~Yes ~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a CnticaJ Environmental Area designated pursuant to .Article 8 of the ECL. and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~L'°Yes .~No 20. Has the site e~er been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~[Yes B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of prolect (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total cont,guous acreage owned or con, oiled by project sponsor ~ ''~ ~)~'-'acres. b. Prolect acreage to be developed: ~' c.~.~ ~-'c""a,~res initially; acres ultimately c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped d Length of project, in miles: 4t ~c~ (If approphate) e. If the prolect ~s an expansion, indicate percent of e~ansion proposed ~.[~. %: f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing//~,~:.A.,¢,¢i ,~:'; proposed g. ,~4aximum ehicular trips generated per hour t'q ~/C../ (upon completion of proiect)? h. If residential. Numt)er and type of housing umts: One Family Two Family tJItimatelv ~ O~mensm, ns hn reet~ of largest proposed structure Multipte Family Condominium (~Che~ght~, ' qIL/~'-~'~' width: length Linear :~-.~-~ ~t frontage along a pubhc thoroughfare oroiect wdl occupy ~s?/~1 /~ ft 2. How much natural material (i.e.. rock. earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? [:]Yes [:]No a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes I-']No c. will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ~'lyes ~No 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any mature.forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? I-lyes []No / 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: t, i1 a, Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? l-lYes [:]No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ~Yes ::::/'No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction '~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ ~ 11 Will proiect require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~Yes q~'No tons/cubic yards after prolect is complete year, (including demolition). year. If yes. explain 12. is surface liquid waste disposal involved? 13 14 _--Yes --~JQo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? F3Yes :~4o Type Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Exp[am GYes !~No 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 Year flood pJain? 16 Will the prolect generate solid waste? _~Yes l~Yes a. If yes, what ~s the amount per month tons b. If yes. will an exisung solid waste facility be used~ ~_Yes ~No c If yes. g~e name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? e. If Yes. explain ~No :Yes _--No 17 Will the prolect revolve the disposal of solid waste~ a. If yes. what ~s the anticipated rate of disposal? b If yes. what ~s the anticipated site life? 18. will project use herbicides or pesticides? '-Yes --_Yes q~'N o tonslmonth. years 19 Will prolect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per dav)l '~Yes ~j~lo 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? I~Yes 21 Will project result in an increase in energy use? :Yes if yes , indicate type(s) 22 If water supply ~s from wells, indicate pumpmg capacity /'~ gallons/minute. 23 Total anuc~pated water usage per day "~'~ ~' ~a,lonsday. ~-' Doe; prolect n~oixe Local, State or Federal funding, -'~s ?No 25. Approvals Required: Type Submittal Date City, Town, Vi!lage Board I-lYes I-iNo City, Town, Village Planning Board f-lYes [~No City, Town Zoning Board [-]Yes E]No City, County Health Department l-lYes I~No Other Local Agencies l~Yes I-1No Other Regional Agencies I-lYes I-INo State Agencies t~]Yes I-INo Federal Agencies I'qYes I-1No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? '~Yes r~No If Yes, indicate decision required: I-Izoning amendment [-Izoning variance I~special use permit I-Isub,~isio~_ I~si~ plan I-Inew/revision of master plan I~resource manage~nt plan E~other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~- 3. What is the maximum potential d,,~f~j~pm~nt of the site~f dev~lope~ as p~L itted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ '~ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6, 'Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? '~Yes 7. What are the predominant land us/~ and zcL~ing classifica;ions within a % mile rad~s of proposed action? 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a V~ mile? ~'(es []No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? ~ ~ a. What ~s the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? I~Yes '~No 11 Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fir~ protectieq)? []Yes a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? I-lYes F~No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? [~Yes ['~o a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E3Yes ~]No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the inf(~natior~rov, id.ed above ~'s"true to the best of my knowledge. ~- Applicant/Sponsor Na~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-z~ ~-~,~, ~ ,. ~(~ ~ D~e ~-//'~/"~ ~ Signature ~/[~ 7- ,/~'"~ Title r~,~ If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Page 2 RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of the Wetland Application of JAMES AND CAROL CASSEL 56-5-4~ to construct a single family dwelling., associated sanitary system, gravel drive, decking, to truck ~n approximately 750 c.y. of clean fill' for grading and sanitary system. Permanent natural buffer zone shall also be maintained all in accordance with submitted plans. The Council recommends approval provided the house is moved landward 10' to allow a larger buffer zone. Willow Point Road, Southold. Vote of Counc~il: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by Betty Wells, 'it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of ONNIK ARSLANYAN ~14-2-17 to replace storm damaged bulkhead. 58525 County Road 48, Creenport. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Stephen Angel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of KENNETH RATH(;EBER 104-13-5 to construct approximately 160 I.f. of timber retaining wall plus (2) 15' returns. Wall to be approximately 8' back of face of existing bulkhead which will be trucked in from upland and delivered over bank. To will then be planted with Rosa rugosa, bayberry, switchgrass, etc. Purpose of project is to restore bank which was eroded by waves which overtopped bulkhead during 12/11/92 storm. Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by Stephen Angetl, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of ANTHONY SCARMATO 31-16-9 to replace (within 48") 124 I.f. of timber retaining wall. Repair in place 73 I.f. of easterly return. Approximately 100 c.y. of clean fill to be trucked in from upland source. Construct a 4' x 4' platform, 4' wide steps from proposed retaining wall to beach. Distance between new and old retaining wall is necessitated by presence of improvements such as fish pond located close behind existing wall which will not allow tie back system to extend very far landward. To compensate, new wall will be 4' out so a 10' tie rod and deadman system can be utilized to afford adequate lateral stability. The Council strongly recommend ~1 because the applicant is proposing to take 4' of beach; there ~s a strong chance the beach would be destroyed; and would create "pockets" along the side of Page 3 structure. The Council suggests replacement be in kind/in place or within 18". 235 Huckleberry Hill Road. East Marion Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was. RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS the Wetland Application of PAUL J. CAREY 123-8-27 to rebuild existing dock. The Council recommends approval provided the structure is raised 4' above the marsh. 270 Park Avenue Ext., Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the Wetland Application of ROBERT JOHNSEN 68-~-3.3 ~; 3.~ to build a house. The Council has tabled the application until an inspection can be made with the house and building envelope staked. 4300 Soundview Avenue, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees DISAPPROVAL of the Wetland Application of EUGENE BURCER 10zt-3-~ to construct a timber dock consisting of a u? x 40' fixed elevated (minimum 4' above grade of marsh) pier (plus steps); 3' x 16{ hinged ramp; 6' x 16' float secured by two pilings. Place approximately 10 c.y. of sand and grade into a berm approximately 3' wide at the base and 1.5' high to extend the width of the parcel (68 +/- '), above AHW and wetlands. Following grading, berm will be planted with Ammorphilla breviligulata on 18" centers. Purpose of berm is to prevent occasional flooding of upland as occurred during 12/92 and 3/93. The Council recommends disapproval of the berm because it could destroy the existing marsh. The Council recommends approval of the dock. 2515 Pine Tree Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by John Hagerty, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of the Wetland Application of DONALD AND LORNA TUTHILL 53-3-28 to seek approval of a building envelope for a single family dwelling. Telephone (516) 765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold. New York 11971 JUL 2 {993 'OWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Southold Town Board of Trustees FROM: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council DATED: July 26, 1993 RE: Recommendation of Applications At the July 22 meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council. the following recommendations were adopted: Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS of Wetland Application of MATTHEW McKIERNAN 86-5-11.5 to construct a 1 1/2 story residence. All material is to be redistributed on prope~y to establish proper grade. Construct a 4' x 50' catwalk over marshland (to be minimum 3' over reeds in meadow) and install post to secure small boat. The Council recommends approval provided the house is located at least 75' from the wetlands. The Council recommends approval of the dock provided it does not hinder navigation. Private Road (Kielbasa Alley) off Indian Neck Lane, Peconic. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by John Holzapfel, seconded by John Hagerty, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees APPROVAL of the Wetland Application of PAUL RACANO 63-7-35 to construct a timber dock consisting of a ~' x 72' fixed, elevated (u2 over grade of marsh) walk; 3' x 16' hinged ramp; 6' x 10' float with 6' x 30' outer float arranged in "T" configuration. A 4' wide x 60' +/- path to be cut through brush on slope leading to dock and surfaced with wood chips. 1265 Calves Neck Road, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Moved by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was TRUSTEES John M. Bredemeyer, III, Pmsidem Albert J. Kmpski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith John B. Tuthill William G. Albertson Telephone (516) 765-1892 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUPERVISOR SCOTT L. HARRIS Town Hall 53095 Main Road PO. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 June 25, 1993 Mr. John Holzaphel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Holzaphel: Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a wetland permits: Matthew McKiernan Paul Racano Carol Cassel ' Onnik Arslanyan Kenneth Rathgeber Anthony $carmato Paul Carey 86-5-11.5 63-7-35 56-5-40 44-2-17 104-13-5 31-16-9 123-8-27 Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to 'this application. Very truly yours, Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees JMB:jmd New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Region l.BIdg. 40 BT~N~ Dear RE: LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST Thomas ~ Jorling Commlsalonor The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environ- mental Quality Review - SEQR) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: Your agency's interest in acting as lead agency; Your agency's jurisdiction in the action described below; and Issues of concern which your agency believes should be evaluated. Enclosed is a copy of the permit application and a completed Part 1 of the Environmental Assessment Form to assist you in responding. Project Name: DEC Project Number: SEQR Classification: DEC Contact Person:~b~ DEC Position: DEC has no objection to your agency or another agency assuming lead agency status for this action, but reserves the right to comment on this action if a positive determination of significance is made. "' ' ' P T1--PROJECTINFORMATIO Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICF: This document ~s designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completmn of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. LOCATION OF ACTION (IncluQe Street Address. Municil3sIity and County; NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR ADDRESS CITY/PO EN'CONSULT,%NTS INC. ;~lRq ¥O9~''; ff"-.t SOUTHAMPTON :,!. ol~-gg3-oL60 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION Please Complete Each Questi A. Site Description BUSINESS TELEPHONE ( STATE I ZIP CODE BUSINESS TELEPHONE Y"7 '7 / ? Ph,,s~caJ setting or overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1 Present land use ~Urban ~Jndustrial _--Commercial 2~Resident~al (suburban) ----Forest ~Agrlculture _--Other , "'75~ acres 2. Total acreage et prelect area: APPROXIMATE ~CREAGE Meado~ or Brushland (Non-a~ncultura[) Forested ~_RuraJ~'non-tatm Agricultural [Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etcd Wetland fFreshwater or tidal as per Articles 24 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated [Rock. earth or fill) Roads. buildings and other paved surfaces Other (indicate type) 3. What ~s predominant sod type(s) on project sKe? a. Soil drainage. ~WeJl drained /(/~,J % or ,~[e PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION acres acres acres -I acres acres acres acres acres acre~ acres acres acres 'L~ acres ,[ acres ~ acres ?~'~'- acres :_-Moderately well drained % of site ~'Poorl¥ drained % .}r -~te b. If anvagrrculturailandlsin','olved~'howman~ acre.: r ,od.]recJass~fiedw~thinsollgroupl through4oftheN~S Land Classification System? /1'1 (~ acres 'S~_e ' ,,('RR 370) : '-~ 'here ?edrr:ck ?u[croDplngs on prol,~t ;~te~ h(No 5. Approximate percentage of propose~)ject site with slopes: ~0-10% _ % [~10-15% ~'~ % i-115% or greater % 6. Is project substanually contiguous to. or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? I-iYes [~o 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I-lYes 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? '~]Yes I-INo 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area.:? DYes l-lNg 11. Does project site contain an,/ species of plant o['~nima[ life ~at, is identified as threatened or endangered? ["lyes ~No According to ~0(~' /-~- Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) [Yes [~o Describe 13. Is the 14. Does 15. Streams within or contiguous to proiect area: a. Name ot Stream and name of River to which it is tributary project site presently used by the corq~_'nity or,,,,neig~bo,C"~od ~ ,RD open space or recreation area? []Yes I-:No If yes, explain the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? []Yes "~No 16. Lakes. ponds, wet[and,,a~as within/or c~tigu0~JS to project area: a. Name L'"~r'~ ~' 't~ /'7'c~,-/~a"~ b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by ex~st~ng public utilities? I-lYes a) If Yes. does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes J~No b) If Yes. will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ,qYes I"qNo 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA. Section 303 and 304~ -~Yes ~"No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 ~'es _--No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ~Yes _~o B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill m dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled/__bY project sponsor - '~ ~)~"'acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: ~to c.A.'~ ~'..~'aj;res initially; acres ultimately. c. Proiect acreage to remain undeveloped AO d. Length of prolect, in miles: /k.f~ (if approphate) e. If the prolect is an expansion, indicate percent of~e~_ansion proposed "~,/c,, %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing//I/) g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour ~J fC,~ (upon completion of project)? h. If residential. Numoer and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Imt~aily /!~ ~/~- Ultimatel~ ~ D~mensm,-s ,n reet) of largest proposed structure length .m,-~tr '"---' .r 'ront~ge ~ion~_ ~ public thoroughfare prolect wd] occupy is? 41 ~ ft Multiple Family height.~ w~dth: Condomm~um 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? i-iYes nNo [~rN/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? I~Yes I-INo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? []Yes ,~lNo 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? ~ acres. 5. Will any matur~?orest (over 100 years old] or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? r-lYes [~No / 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: ~ ~, a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month c. Approximate completion date of final phase month d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? I-lyes I~No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ?lYes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction -~ ; after project is complete (~ 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project ~ ~ 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ~Yes '~'No If yes. exp(ain tons/cubic yards year, (including demolition). year. 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? ~.Yes _"~'~o a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage. industrial, etc.) and amount b. ,Name of ~vater body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface licluid waste disposal involved? mYes 3o Type 14 Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain i-;Yes 15. Is project or ans' porUon of project located in a 100 year flood plain? '~]Yes 16 WHI the prolect generate solid waste? '-Yes a. If yes. what is the amount per month tons b. If yes. wdl an ex~sting solid waste facility be used? "-Yes ~No c. If yes. g~ve name · location d. VVill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitar'¢ landfill? e. If Yes. explain I~No "-Yes ----No 17 Will the prolect involve the disposal of solid waste? --_Yes '!~No a. If yes. what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmonth. b. If yes, what ~s the anticipated site life? years 18. Will proiect use herbicides or pesticides? 7-Yes ~No 19. Will proiect routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? mlYes 20 Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? J"JYes 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? .~Yes ~-~No If yes , indicate type(s), 22. If ~vater supply ~s from wells, indicate, pumping capacity ~ /'~' gallons/minute. 23 Total anticipated water usage per day '"'~4 ~ ~adons day. '£~. ~c~e_~ prolect .'~oi~e Local, State or Federal fund,m-'f _-',es "~No Approvals Required: City, Town, Village Board I-lYes ~No City, Town, Village Planning Board i-lyes I-INo City, Town Zoning Board i'-iYes r-INo City, County Health Department I-lyes F'INo Other Local Agencies l~Yes ~No Other Regional Agencies E]Yes I"lNo State Agencies ~i~Yes I-INo Federal Agencies E}Yes ~No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or If Yes, indicate decision required: Type Submittal Date zoning decision? "~Yes CINo ~zoning amendment [:]zoning variance E]special use permit l'-isub,~isio~_ [:]si.j.te pla~. [-Inew/revision of master plan E]resource manage[Dent plan E]other ff'~e ~' ~"J'/ 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? ~'- 3. What is the maximum potential d~e~pm~nt of the site~ifL /de, vel°pea'as perpqitted by the present zoning? 4 What is the proposed zoning of the site? ~ ~ 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. 'Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? '~Yes ~No 7 What are the predominant land u~e~ and Z~mng cla/gsificaft, ions wi/~in a I/~ mile rac~s of proposed action? 8 is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a ',~ mile? []Ffes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? /q't ~, a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? r-lYes '~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for an,/ community provided services (recreation, education, police. fk? protectie~)? F'] Yes [~No a. If yes. is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? E]Yes I-lNo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ~Yes ~---~o a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? E]Yes ~No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the infc~¥natior/brov, id,ed above ~.true to the,best o.f my knowledge. / Signature If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form beiore proceedinff with this assessment. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION JOINT APPLICA IIN FOR PERMIT CORPS OF ENGINEERS APPLICATION NO ~]ARTICLE 9, Tlll~ 1, ARTICI. I 43 6NYCRR 646 (lAKE GEORGE RECREATION ZONE( ~ARTICLE 15, TIT[E 3 (AQUATIC PESTICIDES CONTROLJ ~6NYCRR 327 (AQUATIC VEGETATIONJ ~6NYCRR 328 ~FISHJ ~bNYCRR 32~INSE('TS] ~A~TICLE lS. tll~ S 6NYCRR ~ (PROTECTION OF WATERS1 ~For ~he d*s~urbance of a STREAM BED OR BANKS or excavation ~n or hU of NAVIGABLE WATERS. . ~I WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION ~AITICLE IS, TITLE IS ~6NYCRR ~1 (WATER SUPPLY) ~6NYCRR ~2 (LONG ISLAND WELL) ~A~TIC~ IS, TITL~ 27 6NYCRR ~ (WILD, SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS] ~ARTIC~ 24 6NYCRR ~2. ~3 (FRESHWATER WETLANDS) ~ARTICLE 36 6NYCRR 5~ (FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT) ~ARTICLE 2S bNYCRR ~1 (TIDAL WETLANDS) ~ARTIC~E 34 6NYCRR 50S (COASTAL EROSION) ~SECTION 10 (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1899) for structures and wo~ in naviBable waters o~ the U.S. ~COASTAL CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION ~SE~ION ~4 (CLEAN WATER ACT OF lg77l for disposal o~ dr~ or fill materiel in waters of the U.S. ~SECTION 103 ~MARINE PROTECTION. R~SEARCH AND SANCTUARIES AC~ for ~he transportation of d~d~ m~ter~als for dumping in~o ocean waters LIST PREVIOUS PERMIT/APPLICATION NUMBERS AND DATES (If any) 2. APPLICANT IS AlAN L NAME OF APPLICANT (Use Full Name) ~THON¥ SCRRM~To ~L~Owner ['~Operator I--]Lessee r~Municipahw/Covemmental ARenc¥ {Check as many as apply) MAILING ADDRESS 235 Nuckleberry HEll Road, P.O. Box 725 POST OFFICE NAME OF ~Jowner ~]ABent~Contact Person (Check one) Rov L. Hajeo En-Consultant-~. Inc. MAILING ADDRESS 1329 North Sea Road POST OFFICE Southampton S PROJECT,FACILiTY LOCATION (Mark [ocatlonon map, see Number 1Bon reverse s~dei TELEPHONE (Where can be reached dunnB day) (5167 4'r7-O76L STATE ~ ZIP CODL NYh lq3g I,TELEPHONE (Where can be reached during day) ~516~ 283-6360 co..t,, Suffolk ] Town orc,t¥ Southold I Village STREET ADDRESS (If different from applicant) 235 Huckleberry Hill Road STATE ZIP CODE NY 11968 POST OFFICE E. Marion b. NAME OF STREAM OR BODY OF WATER Pec~hic Hay 7 HAS WORK BEGUN ON PROJECTZ If YES, attach explanation on startmB work without perm,t, includes dates [~Yes [~No * Show work on map and/or draw,nBs STATE I ZIPCQDE NY ]1939 I,,. W,LL PRO ECT UT,LIZE STATE PROPOSED USE [] Private tO PROPOSED STARTING DATE 11. APPROXIMATE COMPLETION DArE I 12 FEE OF (NYS Permit Onlvl [] Public [] Commerc,al ASAP ASAP I $ 71 n. , Enclosed SEE ATTACHED 14 WILL THiS PROJECT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL FEDERAL. STATE AND/OR LOCAL PERMITS~ TO~ O~ SOH~HO~D~ COE~ DOS ROY b?-_E~]~,~:x., crt tf PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS ON RE%ERSE SIDE EN-CONSULTANTS INC. NORTH SEA RD, 50UTHAMPTON N, Y. 11968 $16'2.83~6360 EAST MAR!ON INC ~329 NORTH SEA RD. SOUTHAMPTON N, y. 1196~ 51{i'283-6360 ,,A/o'7'~ 5