Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#8021-Grant ZBA application Received TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT MAY 18 2025 SOUTHOLD,N.Y. Zoning Board of Appeals NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: February 27, 2025 RENEWED: May 9,2025 TO: Roland Grant 800 Hortons Lane Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated January 13, 2025: For permit: to construct_a new foundation and covered front porch to an existing single- family dwelling at: Location of property: 800 Hortons Lane, Southold,NY County Tax Map No. 1000 - Section 63 Block 1 Lot 9 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The proposed construction,_on this nonconforming,conforming 41,537 sq._ft. lot in the LI District,is not permitted pursuant to Article IIL Section 280-I23,which-states, "a nonconforming building containing a nonconforming use shall not be enlarged,or structurally altered or moved,except as set forth below,unless the use of such building is changed to a conforming use." Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Received 8W4 Fee:$ Filed By: Assignment No. 2pning Boara or Appeals APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS AREA VARIANCE House No. 0 Street c��; l �. ,� Hamlet sy�,4, I SCTM 1000 Section ( .Block t Lot(s) Lot Sipe s Zone 1 I(WE)Aj?pEAL THE WRTI"'tEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING IlNSPECTOR DATED Z '� V�BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED LA-- Iw-7.,pi?.. Owlxer(s): Cr Mailing Address: b 1 � _ - 012 ],Fax: r I Email: ` �1 � �aof C, G&,A Telephone:_ NOTE:In addltloa to the Aboye,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person Va agent represents: Name of Representative: lV ti Lt"t'��s c;�2 � for ) Owner( )Other: Address: `�1_6v k ►� }D ��� ���1� t o c S� Fax: -- Telephone• l�� � � EmafI: *aye check to Weclfy who you wish correspondence io be mailed tn,from the above names: ( Applicantlowner(s), ( ]Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WISE Mg THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED �1`I'11D7� . and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 13- -E FOR: ()o Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy O Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( ) Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the rode.) Article: seetipn: Z.90 Z,j Subsection: Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Reversal or Oer A prior appeal( )has, OQ has not been made at any time with respect to thispronerty, UNDER Appeal No(s). Year(s). . (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our offloe far assistance) ZBA File# Name of Owner: Received MAY , REASONS FOR APPEAL: Zoning U� 1 -An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties if granted because:The house structure has existed for over 100 years.The surrounding neighborhood was built after this house was in place.The variance is requested to repair and restore the existing building to an occupiable status and ensure the public's safety.This structure is the essence of the neighborhood,the surrounding buildings have created the altered look. 2—The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue other than an area variance, because:The variance is specific to this particular building.There is no new construction occurring,the proposed work is for repair and restoration back to the original historic structure that existed over 100 years ago. 3—The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: Negligible because the proposed repair and restoration is not quantifiable in relation to the code.Th is no change to the original I( pre-1957)of coverage or setbacks. 4—The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because:The house structure has existed for over 100 years.The surrounding neighborhood was built after this house was in place.The variance is requested to repair and restore the existing building to an occupiable status and will definitely be an improvement to the neighborhoods environment. 5—Has the alleged difficulty been self-created? { }Yes {X}No Why: The Zoning laws implemented have created the need for this variance.The residential structure has existed for over 100 years and maintaining its status for occupancy was never an issue prior to the zoning laws. Arether any Covenants or Restrictions on this land? { X}No { }Yes (furnish a copy) This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Sworn to before me this day of 20A Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Notary Public THOMAS J.MCCARTHY Notary Public,State of haw York 5uf'alk Cour iy-No.5004790 a00% APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For 2'BA Reference) Received Applicant: V-10,( CWA Date Prepared: BAAY 12 2025 L For Demolition of Existing Building Areas Please describe areas be' g removed: �3 n j-Vi \j 'fy Board of Appeals Uri U. New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or 1�ew Addi donsfErtensio ) Dimensions of first floor extension: k `'AA k c�U �7► ��''Y!'��t Dimensions of new second floor: w k i- : Dimensions of floor above second level: `,� c. : #u :� :�►K Height(from finished ground to lop of ridge): Z(a'-- " Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? If yes,please provide height(above ground) measured from natural existing grade to first floor: Y'e s - 2 1-6'% M. Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (attach extra sheet if necessary)- Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFPRE Alterations: �rc'��e• ( ,� Number of Floors and Changes H Alterations IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage(from.surveyor): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: _' a Proposed increase of building coverage: Square footage of your lot: 14 Percentage of coverage of your lot by Vuilding area: (n. 3 '?n V. Parpose of New.Construction: I c' t V-A1') - [, 1sic�4 Vl. Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): tot �� ��: , eke&" -- Please submit seven(7)photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for new construction),and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. 7/2002; 2/2005; 1/2007 QUESTIONNAIRE Receivarf FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION MAYr2 � A. Is the subject pre ices listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes C N4 Zoning Boara of l��JNCdIL B. A7there any proposals to change or alter land contours? No Yes please explain on attached sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?PR 3.)Is a roperty bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area`? 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have contacted the Office of the Town trustees for its determination ofsurisdicti n f� Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Trustees: and if issued,please attach copies of permit with conditions and approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? Q E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkh or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting?�0 Please show area of the structures on a diagram if any exist or state none on the above line. w F. Do you have any construction taking place at this time concerning your premises? � if yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe:G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If any are lacking,please apply to the Building Department to either obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcelb If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey. I. PIease list present use operations conducted at this Gel vz_eo c''1 vDI [ram vc.s t� c and the proposed use �r 0 C (ex:existing single family,proposed:same with garb.pool other) uthorized signature an Date gUpfll[� Town of Southold 3/25/2025 ,A 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 1197140 �( Received P 12 E EXISTING MAY 12 2025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Board of Appeals No: 46013 Date: 3/25/2025 THIS CERTIFIES that the structure(s)located at: 800 Horton Ln, Southold SCTM#: 473 889 Sec/Block/Lot: 63.-1-9 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the requirements for a built prior to APRIL 9, 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z- 46013 dated 3/25/2025 was issued and conforms to all the requriements of the applicable provisions of the law- The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: Dila-idaled wood frame structure..[former dwelling)witli accessory masonry garage._Wood frame sti-«cture not to be occupied.* The certificate is issued to Grant RM Revoc Trt. (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED f7 *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. /1LIl 1[rl i .[: Si/gilatu BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �1 HOt!SING CODE INSPECTION REPORT Received LOCATION: 800 Horton Ln, Southold _ SUFF. CO.TAX MAP NO.: 63.-1-9 SUBDIVISION: NAME OF OWNER(S): Grant RM Revoc Trt. 80arci-et Appeal6-- OCCUPANCY: ____�.._ _..T�_--•----.-- - ���nt�3. _.__._. __ _-- ADMITTED BY: � __ SOURCE OF REQUES_T: Grant,Roland r _ DATE: 3/25/2025 Y DWELLING: #STORIES: 2 #EXITS: 2 FOUNDATION:~ _ Brick CELLAR: Partial CRAWL SPACE: Partial BATHROOM(S): 2 Wp�� TOILET ROOM(S): UTILITY ROOM(S): PORCH TYPE: Rear Gn oscd DECK TYPE: _ PATIO TYPE: BREEZEWAY: FIREPLACE: 3 GARAGE: DOMESTIC HOTWATER: � TYPE HEATER: Radiators_ AIR CONDITIONING: WATER: _ TYPE HEAT: None WARM AIR: HOT ATE _ No #BEDROOMS: 4­ #KITCHENS: 1 BASEMENT TYPE: UA ote d¢5 W(le—.. _ OTHER: ACCESS0RV' STRLt'TURI_S: GARAGE,TYPE OF CONST: Block STORAGE,TYPE OF CONST: � SWIMMING POOL: GUEST,TYPE OF CONST: OTHER: VIOLATIONS: Foundation has collapsed in some areas.Wood frame structure should not be entered. REMARKS: INSPECTED BY: DATE OF INSPECTION: —��� TIME START: END: FORM NO. 4 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Recpi�, ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT Town Clerk's Office MAY 12 LL Southold, N. Y. Zoning Board of App@@Is Certificate Of Occupancy No. . G' �7 . Date . . . . . . . . J�.�-.�. . . .� �. . . ., 19. . . . THIS CERTIFIES that the building located at . /`S, , . . T 0. ti. . . . Street Map No. . . . . �. . . . . . Block No. . . . . . . .Lot No. . . . . . .• . o u l~ f'1 0 �-�� N.I. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated `j''.I .�. . . . . . ., 19.6 pursuant to which Building Permit No. . . . . .. .l dated `. . . . . . °�b. . . . . . ., 19�."7. , was issued, and conforms to all of the require- ments of the applicableprovisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is . . .1. 1 l T =. . .0.0E. . .�ACo- . l t/. . .Q fiJ G LL.�. N. The certificate is issued to 1DA rQAI . . . . . .0 W. N 1Z•. _ . . . . . . (owner, lessee or tenant) of the aforesaid building. Suffolk County Department of Health Approval . J v.� .3 qeq- r�chf?oc Lic/L UNDERWRITERS CERTIFICATE No. . . . , Yam!✓,V HOUSE NUMBER. . . . 7.dO. . .Street. . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 4. /ti�dlhngg Inspector IN OTIs - Y &O'%I Lli H M C FORM NO. 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N. Y. MAY 12 2025 BUILDING PERMIT Zoning Board of APPe"15 (THIS PERMIT MUST BE KEPT ON THE PREMISES UNTIL FULL COMPLETION OF THE WORK AUTHORIZED) ill? 2822 Z Date ..............................July.....26........... 19.45 Permission is hereby granted to: ................... Quahv3. . ........................................ to ....M ►e.. .. ..�a1e�t�I ..�ai��3•e- Ome. . .. ... ..area-4112A). ....................... at premises located at I.......9/0....$OZ'tow LAIM...................................,.»............,.......................... ........ ........................... •�eRzt, �3�y... . �r7E�c............................................................................... pursuant to application dated ..................................... T..... . ., 19.45., and approved by the Building Inspector Fee $....2,G ©p....... 7.. Building Ins�ector S�FFat�c Town of Southold 4/10/2023 P.O.Box 1179 t' 53095 Main Rd �- ti Southold,New York 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MpY 12 2�25 d of Appeals No: 39061 Date: 7-002/1"f THIS CERTIFIES that the building ELECTRICAL Location of Property: 800 Horton Ln, Southold SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 63.-1-9 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 4/21/2017 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 41544 dated 4/21/2017 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: 200 AMP U3\0ERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE The certificate is issued to Grant,Roland of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 41544 06-20-2017 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Authorized Signature r BOARD MEMBERS 0��.Zf soUT,yaf 53095 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson `� Southold,NY 11971-0959 Patricia Acampora Office Location: G Eric Dantes Town Annex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. �� 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento CCU y` - Southold,NY 11971 RECEIVED http://southol w 966a-,, �- •�1.�-bt G 313o�w1 or��J ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS J L 3 0 2024 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel. (631)765-1809 Southold Town Clerk FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF JULY 25,2024 ZBA FILE: #7847 NAME OF APPLICANT: Roland Grant, President of SQUEST,INC. SCTM#1000-63-1-9 PROPERTY LOCATION: 800 Horton Lane, Southold,NY. SE RA DETERMINATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions,without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIYE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 25,and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated September 29, 2023,stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETEIiMINAT IDN; The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD: The application was referred to the Town of Southold Planning Board, who has concurrent jurisdiction with the ZBA on this application, for comment which was received dated July 3, 2024 indicating that the Planning Board does not support the project as applied for because the proposed project is oversized for the subject lot and out of scale with the neighborhood.There are many private single-family dwellings along Horton Lane, a number of which are historic properties, including one that is directly across the street from the proposed storage facility. There were additional concerns relating to the location: of the driveway, Dark Skies Compliance and whether an accessory apartment of the proposed size is appropriate. Furthermore, if approved by the ZBA,the Planning Board, in its site plan approval process, may require further changes to the site plan and review under the State Environmental Quality Review Act,as lead agency. These comments are part of the record. PROPERTY FACTSIDESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is a conforming 41,537 square foot lot in the Light Industrial(LI)Zoning District. The northerly property line measures 148.66 feet,the easterly property line measures 261.23 feet,the southerly property line measures 148.31 feet and is adjacent to M.T.A Long Island Railroad and the westerly property line measures 116.96 feet to the RCA driveway, southwesterly 1&64 feet, then 78.72 feet and finally 86.07 feet northwesterly for a total of 298.33 feet adjacent to Horton Lane. The parcel is improved with a fabricated mobile home on the southwest area of the property. There is a temporary portable office trailer located near the easterly property line, a two-story frame single-family dwelling located in front of the temporary office trailer fronting on Horton Lane, and a cinder block and frame garage located at the northwest corner near Horton Lane as shown on the survey map prepared by Donald J. Metzger, LS,and last revised April 14,2022. Page 2,July 25,2024 Received ✓ #7847,Roland Grant SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 MAY 12 2025 Zoning Board of Appol§ BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances from Article XV, Section 280-62C; Article XV, Section 280- 64B and 280-64C; and thee Building Inspector's August 4,2023,Amended October 17,2023 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for a permit to demolish existing building and construct two public self-storage building (A&B),with building"A"creating an accessory apartment on the second floor and to maintain the existing 26.8 foot by 37 foot garage/storage building; at 1) buildings"A and B" less than the coded required minimum variable front yard setback of 70 feet; 2)building"A and B" less than the code required minimum rear yard setback of 70 feet; 3) buildings "A and B", located in the HALO Zone, more than the permitted 60 linear of frontage on one street; 4) building "A" proposing a non-permitted accessory apartment use; 5) garage/storage less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 100 feet; 6)garage/storage less than the. code required minimum side yard setback of20 feet; located at 800 Horton Lane,Southold,NY. SCTM#1000-63-1-9. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to demolish an existing building and construct two public self-storage buildings (A & B), with an accessory apartment to be created on the second floor of storage building "A" measuring 1,598 sq. ft in area, and to maintain the existing 26.8 feet by 37 feet garage/storage building all of which will require the following variance relief(9 total): 1. Front yard setback of 38.57 feet for building A instead of the code required minimum 70-foot setback. 2. Front yard setback of 25 feet for building B instead of the code required minimum 70-foot setback. 3. Rear yard setback of 51.98 feet for Building A instead of the code required minimum of 70 feet 4. Rear yard setback of 51.98 feet for Building B instead of the code required minimum of 70 feet 5. Linear street frontage of 86 feet for building A instead of the code permitted maximum of 60 linear feet. 6. Linear street frontage of 73 feet for building B instead of the code permitted maximum of 60 linear feet 7. A non-permitted accessory apartment use in building A, pursuant to Town Code section 280-62C. 8. Front yard setback of 29.1 feet for the 984 sq.ft.storage building, instead of the code required minimum 100 feet 9. Side yard setback of 3.2 feet for the 984 sq. ft. storage building, instead of the code required minimum setback of 20 feet. Site Plan approval by the Southold Town Planning Board is also required ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: In ZBA #7669 dated September 15, 2022, the Board of Appeals denied the applicant's previous application requesting four variances to construct one(1)self-storage building,which was over 5,200 sq. ft. larger than the current proposal. Originally this application was submitted and publicly noticed for the December 7, 2023 ZBA Public Hearing, and was adjourned because the Southold Town Planning Board, who has concurrent jurisdiction with the ZBA and is lead agency on the subject application, requested time to review the application and submit comments to the Board of Appeals. The Planning Board submitted their comments, which caused the applicant to revise their application. The revised application was submitted to the Planning Board and comments were again received by the Board of Appeals on July 3, 2024 (see Town of Southold Planning Board above). Additionally, both letters of support and objection have been received FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOARD ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on December 7,2023 and July 11,2024 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law C267-b(3){b)M. Grant of the variances will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Horton Lane between Rt 25 and Cr 48 is a mixed residential and commercial street. While the subject lot is zoned Light Industrial(LI),and a few other lots are zoned for commercial use, most lots are residential and/or agricultural (AC). To the North of the subject lot is a self-storage facility which is set way back from Horton Lane on a flag lot; two other small business;preserved farm fields; older single-family Received MA Page 3,July 25,2024 `( 12 2025 r��. -� #7847,Roland Grant SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 Zoning 13oard of Appeals dwellings, and a church. To the south of the subject parcel lies a railroad track; a printing business in an historic building,and more dwellings. The proposed project is adjacent to a national historic district. Horton Lane is already a heavily traveled feeder road between the Main Road(Route 25)and to CR 48(AKA North Road or Middle Road). Additional traffic generated from the proposed public storage facility located so close to Horton Lane without code conforming landscaped buffers will adversely affect the primarily residential character of this neighborhood. Further, light intrusion from car and truck headlights by tenants using the facility at night would be a disturbance to the residential property owners. The proposed size of the facility is over scaled for the subject lot and not in character with the size of other buildings along Horton. The single-family dwelling proposed to be demolished is listed as an historic home by the Southold Landmarks Preservation Commission. The demolition of this historical home would not be consistent with the Town's goals to preserve its heritage and character.The applicant has not proposed a plan to repurpose this building. Although there is a row of mature evergreens along the side and rear property lines of the subject parcel,the existing accessory storage building(garage) so close to the front and side property lines prevents the establishment of mitigating buffers along the street frontage. Currently the subject property is not well maintained and is unsightly and a smaller scaled project with proper screening and the removal of a mobile home and other structures in disrepair could improve the property and the visual character of the neighborhood. 2. Town Law 267-b 3 b 2 . The benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances as proposed. While the Board acknowledges that some variance relief is likely to be necessary to establish the proposed use on the subject lot, the applicant can further revise his plans to be more in scale with the size of the property and other nearby properties;further reduce the degree of non- conformity;and provide greater,more conforming buffers to screen the proposed storage facility from the residential properties along Horton Lane. 3. Town Law 267- b)(3). The variances herein are mathematically substantial, representing the following: 1. 25.7%relief from the code for the rear yard setback of building A 2. 25% relief from the code for the rear yard setback of building B 3. 45% from the code for the front yard setback of building A 4. 64%relief from the code for the front yard setback for building B 5. 58%relief from the code for the front yard setback of the as built accessory garage/storage building 6. 84%relief from the code for the side yard setback of the as built accessory garage/storage building 7. 43% relief for the linear street frontage of building A 8. 21.6%relief for the linear street frontage of building B 9. 100% relief for the non-permitted accessory apartment in building A. However, there is ZBA precedent for an approval of an accessory apartment in a storage facility building so long as the tenant is an employee engaged in on-site 24 hour security for the storage facility. 4. Town Law 267-b 3 b 4 . Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood.While there are some commercial businesses along Horton Lane between Main Road(Rt. 25)and CR 48 (North or Middle Road)and the intersection of Horton and CR 48 is developed with a church,most of the lots are developed with historic dwellings and preserved farm land. A large public storage facility, without conforming landscaped buffers and buildings that are not in scale with the size of the subject lot,will have an adverse visual impact on the physical appearance of the streetscape. 5. Town Law 4267-bQ)(b)(5). The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6.Town Law 4267-b. Grant of the requested relief Is Not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a public storage facility with an accessory apartment and garage/storage building Received - i Page 4,July 25,2024 MAY 12 20, #7847,Roland Grant SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 Zoning Board of Appeals while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-B,motion was offered by Member Weisman(Chairperson), seconded by Member Acampora, and duly carried, to DENY the variances as applied for Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson),Dantes, Planamento,Acampora and Lehnert. (5-0) Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson 7 Approved for filing 717 /2024 BOARD MEMBERS Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson ��� 5r3(��f�, y 95 Main Road• P.O.Box 1179 � � --, Southold,NY 1 1 97 1-095 9 Patricia Acampora 2� � Office Location: Eric Dantes G �`( 1�' Town Amex/First Floor, Robert Lehnert,Jr. -�� ® y0 Nt 5437 ll �aad(at Youngs Avenue) Nicholas Planamento .{rCn Board `, Southold,NY 11971 � 7_0ri�v\9 � ` RECEIVED http://southoldtownny.gov Pt 6 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS S 1 9 202� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Tel.(631)765-1809•Fax(631)765-9064 ✓ Southold To►.nrr Clerk FINDINGS, DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION MEETING OF SEPTEM 3ER 15, 2022 ZBA FILE: # 7669 NAME OF APPLICANT: Roland Grant PROPERTY LOCATION: 800 Horton Lane, Southold,NY. SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 SEORA DETERM[NATION: The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type 11 category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23,and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated April 25,2022 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: The relief, permit, or interpretation requested in this application is listed under the Minor Actions exempt list and is not subject to review under Chapter 268. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PLANNING BOARD: The application was referred to the Southold Town Planning Board for comment. In the Planning Board's response dated August 29,2022,they stated that;overall,the Planning Board does not support the variances requested,and in particular,the proposed new building on this highly visible property adjacent to the historic district appears too large for the parcel. The linear frontage of over 199 linear feet exceeds the maximum 60 linear feet and is completely out of sale for its location in the HALO Zone and directly adjacent to the Hamlet Center. It is the Planning Board's belief that the code for this district was intended to discourage construction of new buildings that are out of scale with the community and to prevent the appearance of a continuous frontage of development along roads. Regarding the preexisting storage building,the requested side yard setback of approximately three feet does not allow for evergreen screening to be planted. In addition,the Planning Board would support a building configuration that would place parking in the rear of the structures and placement of the proposed structures closer to the street. In the past, the Zoning Board has approved an apartment accessory to a self-storage facility,as long as the tenant is employed by the business operation as either manager or security personnel, and that the apartment would achieve the Town's goal in providing workforce housing. Most importantly relating to the Zoning Board of Appeals standards, the project does not support community character in this area surrounded by residential properties and adjacent to the Southold National Historic District. In conclusion, the Planning Board reiterates that the size of the building is out of scale with the parcel and its unique location. The size and length of the proposed self-storage building and existing building does not allow for appropriate screening on the parcel. The Planning Board also notes that while the shape of the subject parcel may seem limiting,the parcel size is 41,537 sq. ft. which meets the 40,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size for the Light Industrial Zone District. The parcel meets the Page 2,September 15,2022 97669, Grant SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 ra 0i �ggeAtis 7A+ri�n9 a°a minimum lot width(+/-261 feet where 100 feet is required); and the minimum lot depth is ess than 2 feet short of the minimum requirement(148 feet where 150 feet is required). Therefore, the Planning Board concludes that the setback requirements for this LI zoned parcel are appropriate as stated in the Bulk Schedule. PROPERTY FACTS/DESCRIPTION: The parcel is a conforming.41,537 square foot parcel located in the Light Industrial (LI) Zoning District. The parcel is irregularly shaped and runs 164.79 feet fronting Horton's Lane along the westerly property line, turns east for 16.74 feet and then continues running 116.97 feet. The parcel measures 148.31 feet along the MTA(LLRR) on the South side,runs 261.23 feet on the East side and 148.66 feet on the North side. The parcel is improved with a two-story frame house,a cinder block frame building,a temporary office trailer, and a mobile home. All is shown on a survey prepared by Donald J.Metzger last revised April 14,2022. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variances under Article XV, Section 280-62C,280-63,280-64B and 280- 64C and the Building Inspector's February 24, 2022 Notice of Disapproval based on an application to demolish existing buildings and construct a public self-storage building with an accessory apartment on the second floor and to maintain the existing 26.8 feet by 37 feet garage/storage building,at: 1)proposed storage building measuring more than the minimum permitted 60 linear feet of frontage on one street; 2)the proposed accessory apartment use is not permitted; 3) existing storage building located less than the code required minimum front yard setback of 100 feet; 4)existing storage building located less than the code required minimum side yard setback of 20 feet; located at: 800 Horton Lane, Southold, NY. SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests variances to 1)construct a storage building with a rear yard setback of 20'4"where town code requires a minimum 70 foot rear yard setback;2) construct a building that has 199'4" of street frontage where town code permits a maximum of 60 feet of street frontage in parcels located in a HALO Zone or Hamlet Center; 3)The proposed construction of an accessory apartment on this parcel is not a permitted use; and 4), the existing storage building accessory to the existing single-family dwelling has a non-conforming front yard setback of 29'1 3/8" and a non-conforming side yard setback of+/- 3 feet. Town code requires a minimum front yard setback of 70 feet and a minimum side yard setback of 20 feet. This application also requires site plan approval from the Town Planning Board. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant's proposed use of a storage building is a permitted use in the LI Zoning District and this use is not a subject of review in this variance request. The Building Department informed the Planning Board that because the applicant is proposing to change the use on the property,demolish a structure and create a new building,even legally existing buildings that are being maintained, such as the pre-existing cinder block garage, are required to be conforming to the Town Code. FINDINGS OF FACT/REASONS FOR BOATED ACTION: The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on September 1, 2022 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation, personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law 4267-b(3)(b)(1). Grant of the variances for the non-conforming building length will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood consists of mixed-uses including single-family dwellings,an existing storage facility,a machine shop,railroad tracks, and other small scale commercial uses. The property is directly across the street from two residences and directly adjacent to the Southold National Historic District. The existing dwelling on the subject property, proposed to be demolished, is in disrepair and is currently uninhabitable but is of historic value and appears on the Southold Landmarks Preservation Commission Historic Buildings/Places Inventory, listed as the Joseph H. Horton House circa pre-1858. This largely residential neighborhood included Light Industrial Zoning along the railroad tracks W eo Page 3,September 15,2022Q,l�-' #7669,Granta� SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 L P,'P��� o�td o` because historically local farmers loaded their crops directly onto railroad cars for tran��itt!g&ere are still agricultural properties that are being farmed along Horton Lane today. The storage facility on the parcel adjacent to the subject property was approved in 1987 prior to the Zoning Code update in 1989. Therefore, this facility predates zoning code standards that the Town put in place to protect community character and is consequently not a valid comparison when considering the character of the subject neighborhood. Moreover, that storage building is on a flag lot and only part of it faces Horton's Lane. The subject storage building is proposed with a front fagade measuring 199.4 linear feet long, two stories in height with conditioned basement storage and parking in the front yard along Horton Lane. That size is not in keeping with its location in the Southold Hamlet HALO Zone and directly adjacent to the Hamlet Center and will significantly change the character of the neighborhood. Additionally, siting the storage facility with less than the minimum 70-foot rear yard setback will further change the character of the neighborhood because it will create a parking lot in the front of the parcel as opposed to hiding parked cars in the rear of the parcel. Grant of the variances for the as built accessory cinder block garage's non-conforming front yard setback of 29 feet and non-conforming side yard setback of+/- 3 feet will not produce an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood. The applicant is proposing to continue using the existing garage for storage and residential use and the existing setbacks will be maintained. Further the applicant states that the structure is equipped with an electrical outlet for an electric car charging station and solar panels, which are environmentally desirable attributes. Finally, the large front yard setback required in the LI zone is designed to ensure sufficient room for landscaped buffers to screen large industrial buildings from the street and public view. The as built accessory garage on the subject lot measures 37 feet by 26.7 feet and is residential in scale and use. 2. Town Law 267-6 3 b 2 . The benefit sought by the applicant for building length and rear yard setback relief can be achieved by some method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than area variances. The Zoning Board acknowledge that the required minimum 100-foot front yard setback and the required minimum 70-foot rear yard setback equals a combined 170 feet in required setback dimensions. The subject parcel's lot width is 148 feet. This Board understands that this parcel will require some form of variance relief. However, the applicant could build a storage building with a more code conforming building length and rear yard setback by re-designing the proposed project at a scale that is more in keeping with the character of the existing neighborhood. The benefit sought by the applicant for the non-conforming apartment use cannot be achieved via any means other than variance relief. However, prior ZBA decisions have overturned the Building Department's determination that this use is not permitted in storage facilities, based on the security requirements of this type of business, so long as the apartment tenant is employed by the public storage/warehouse business as a caretaker/manager/security personnel. However, the Board has not approved such accessory apartments where the size or location of a storage facility is not feasible for the size or location of the parcel on which it is proposed to be built and where substantial variances are required for approval.The benefit sought by the applicant for the pre-existing non-conforming accessory cinder block garage cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance. The structure is pre-existing non-conforming and no change in location is proposed. However,the benefit sought by the applicant for the accessory building's non-conforming front yard setback and side yard setback could be achieved by proposing a development plan for the parcel that does not change the principal use of the property. 3. Town Law $267-b(3)(b)(3). The variance denied herein for the non-conforming rear yard setback is mathematically substantial, representing 72% relief from the code. The variance denied herein for the non- conforming building length is mathematically substantial, representing 232% relief from the code. The variance denied herein for the non-conforming accessory structure front yard setback is mathematically substantial representing 59%relief from the code. The variance denied herein for the accessory structure's non-conforming side yard setback is mathematically substantial representing 85%relief from the code. The variance denied herein for the non-conforming accessory apartment is mathematically substantial representing 100%relief from the code. 1 ' L Page 4,September 15,2022 � 0669,Grant SCTM No. 1000-63-1-9 Oi 4. Town Law$267-b(3)(b)(). Evidence has been submitted to suggest that a variance in this re id 3 a community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborlpW he Planning Board in their written comments and neighborhood residents who testified at the public hearing voiced concerns about the adverse impacts that the proposed size of the storage facility and the demolition of the old Joseph H.Horton House would have on neighborhood quality and character. 5. Town Law 267-b 3 b 5 The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Code was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6.Town Law$267-b. Grant of the requested relief is not the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a storage facility while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. The overall size of the project can be reduced to better conform to the zoning code. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD: In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under New York Town Law 267-13, motion was offered by Member Dantes, seconded by Member Acampora,and duly carried, to DENY as applied for, Vote of the Board: Ayes: Members Weisman(Chairperson)Dantes,Acampora, and Lehnert. This Resolution was duly adopted (4-0)(Member Planamento Abstained) Oes1fle LKaanedWeisman, Chairperson Approved for filing 7 //0 12022 AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ��� gx) ZONING BOARD.OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD . a a\ ffjWN.TU USE;THIS FORM; The form must be completer/ley the aWicant-for any special use perrn>Et,site pkfi appro a4 use wrr-irrnee;np-vubdivision approrql og propeM xdt3rM an Mdealtural AsOlet OR wilhih 500 feetaf a fonts ope"ratlon located hs agricultural district.All applli t4110ns requiting an agrica tural data fp#erfsent must be referreit to the Srrffotk Cos:rsiy Deparftant of Planning. accordarl with Sections 239= rrs rsrid Z39-n•gf the Gerseru(MrirttcipazIcw. .• •l.}Name of Applicant; -c�� �.� :�-�'• �u'ct.�. �1� t�.: ���-� '• ' •2)Address of Applicant: I �r�, '•3)Natne of Land owner(tf'other than applicant) 4)Address of Land Owner: 5}Descriptiort,ofProposedPrajeat: 6)Location Of Property(road and tax map • 7)'4 the parcel witbin azr agi icultu ral districil O Rio DYcs•if yes,Agr-ictl#ur District•Numb' $)Ts#lzis parce)art]vely farmed? QNQ.0Yes 9}. Native anti. address-of arty owne*).'of•laod within the agrki lturai distt'iet dontahAzig active farm operatioxx(s}'located 5ti0 feet of the of the proposed pr0jeci..(�tft�rt>aation.may be,available through . 'the,t6v,ia Assepsom Office., Towil Hall locadon.(765-1931) or from any public cainputer at the Towh Hall locations by viewing the parcel number•ori the-Town of Southold,Reai Property T4X Syatemn. ; Name and Address, �0 3 .2. � 4. (Please iike back-side of page if more than six property owners are•identified.) The lot numbers may:be obtained,in aduapce,when requested'fromn either the Office of the Planning Board,at 765-19U or the Zoning Board of.Appeals at 765-1809. ` ! 2,4)L� Signature of Applicant I.The Iocal boarrl.wiiE solicit corhments from.the owners of land identified•above ih order ta•cansider the effect of the'prppnsed aCtio$ on their farm'operation.Solicitation will,be made by supplying.zoopy of this statement- •" 2.Comments t!elurned to the local board•will.be taken into consideratiori-as part of theovtxall rcyiow.of this application. 3.Copies of the co' pleted Agricultural Data Statement•shall be-sent b3rappiicant and/or the clerk of the board tb the property owners identified above.The cost for mailing steal[bo paid by the applicant at the'time the application is submitted for review.fail�to pay at , slali tithe means the application is not complete and,rannbt be acted upon by the board. 1-14-09 Gel 617.20 y '�`� 0,\s Append&B o� Ppp Short EnvironmentalAssessment Form $cold Nstructions for Con letin Part 1-Project information. The applicant or project sponsor Is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses became part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and maybe subject to further verification. Complete part I based an information currently available_ if additional research or investigation would be needed to folly respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as passible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 4 ro e�tsndponsor Infor��'ti Name o Action or Project: Project Locati (describe.and attach a location map): Brief Description of Proposed Action: ��`(�c•r('` ��!j YL 2� '`����^i �l l� jrflfn Ca� ���T�Z t�' � 1 YIR A' SaAacr —c- Na{m�e of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 1�-PAaA4- �9 lrMail: ra ��� �i �`(n C�cLa�l•f� Address: \ 1 City/Po:r 7�l state: ~� Zip, e�l'1 ''11 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be ai1'ected in the municipality and prod to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or firrsding from any other governmental AgenW NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? a acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? dS� acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban o Rura1(non-agriculture) o industrial ACornmertial 'K esrdetrtl��a��l���(suburban) , p ❑Forest o Agriculture ❑Aquatic ►�{ or(specify): �� l:�"y►� '� ��k� ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 S. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? V,--e-kscl� *C \JI-v(N"ov C'c b.Consistent-with the adopted comprehensive plan? U" 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing builitirmhR NO YES landscape? % "I", V 7. Is the site ofthe proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Envlmrffiehtal Area? pk� 19s YES If Yes,identify: _ 0 x 8, a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: A 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO /YES` Places? Y b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? �\, X 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? �y If Yes,identify the watland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline 0 Forest 0 Agricultural/grasslands 0 Early mid-successional 0 Wetland 17 Urban ;Suburban IS.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? JX NO O YES k, b.Will stone water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems( off and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe. NO 0 YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YF.S water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO ifs` solid waste management facility? oa d ° 8 X If Yes,describe: __ -�����g_ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponso e: YeA 6_� 69,cvA Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all ofthe following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part i and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" �#�, �' �,�' �' P ' ''� ,�, rl• � d - r: Small to large x zip {. r• _�:�;: . ��.,:���., �,- ,� �, -. .,;�.�•, � may may 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3- Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment ofa Critical Environmental Area(C'EA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available cnEg conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? S. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.&,wetlands, waterbodies,gro mdwatier,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 • ,r.3t:. ..:, h -+:;;:,.a :;� ;,. �„��.. ... oderate .,'� - ••.;--•��r-::;;.�::L•.:I•,Sr;-i�r«•�;:����`. No,or lV[ . .• :. : t "'st �. ; 3' small to large ��:�,: •. �, impact 1m t ::• ,+r•�•`. ,N"1•Y �� ,� ��r may � .�+ -,• f_., ti'�x N�:� =ti:. occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? e�� 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? $data of Part 3-Determination of signiticance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3 Tor every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur".or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. o Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. 0 Check this box ifyou have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics nrohibit5 coninictsof interest on the art of town officers and employees.The ur ose of this farm i sto.p rovide information which can alert the town of ossible conflicts of interest and aIIow it to take whatever action is necessary to avoid same. 'Z9 _�iVM � YOUR NAME: ]lG ���Y 7 i G �c�C� : 1� {Last name,first usme,middle initial,umiess you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.Uso,indicate,the other person's or company's name.) eo �e TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) ° ��25 Tag grievance Building Permit Trustee Permit oa, Variance Change of Zone Coastal ErosionP t6 a� �PP Approval of Plat Mooring a Other(activity) Planning Z Flo you personally(or through your company,sponge,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationshlp°'includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If No,sign and date below.If YES,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where Indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)andlor describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) Q an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of Signature Print Name AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM C "I The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of Interest an the part of town officers and employges_'IaLe ouroaae of this form is to provide information which can alert the taw of Dossible conflicts of interest and allow it to take w atever action€s_necessary_o ayWd same. Heceiv YOUR NAME : ZOZ� (Last name,first name.middle initial,unless you sre applyin the name of someone else or other en company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Zoning Board of Appeals Tax grievance Building Permit Variance %` Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or gmployee owns more than 5%of the shares. ITS NO If No,sign and date below.If Yes,complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) Q an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted tUq day 202 5-- Signature l Print Name Town of Southold Received LW"CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM MAY 12 2025 A. INSTRUCTIONS Zoning Board of Appeals 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. 7bu3, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a• determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. if an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions,it shall not be underW(en. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office_ B. DESCRIPTION OF ME AND PROPOSED ACTION The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): Town Board Planning Dept. 0 Building Dept. Board of Trustees R 1. Category of-Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): ,--, (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency(e.g. capital construction,planning activity,agency regulation,land transaction) (b) Financial assistance(e.g.grant,loan,subsidy) (c) Permit,approval,license,certification: D Nature and extent of action: Location of action:_ c����� L"C'_- � 1 t� Site acreage: ® Receive M� ` 1 Present land use: ` S r �� MAY 2 2025 Present zoning classification: Zoning Board of Appeals 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant_ (b) Mailing address: _ �� �-��• d��, ray ����� - - - - (c) Telephone number:Area Code( ) 110 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ NoX If yes,which state or federal agency? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development fn the Town of Southold that enhance community character, preserves open space,makes efficient qse of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of coastal location,and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section M---Policies;Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yea ❑ No ❑ (Not Applicable-please explain) Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria 13 Yes E3 No ❑ (Not Applicable--please explain) : 11 Hortons Lane - Southold ceived aA • • 0 n a House • Looking a r ■' � i - House • and Side—LookingNorth Page 1 of �Aeeei\jeb U�u J^ Board of kppeals .. -Zoning House Rear and Side—Looking North West _ Y r :w u, v;i�,� --y��'N�tr�s:.ii.a�: -:�:'•. "' �?'i�,"t:'-t16r'���:L-- House Rear and Side—Looking South West Page 2 of 4 � 'CON 00 r� : o{ PPP Boardea1s JIM G J House Side—Looking South it T Yr i' . i i rF- r,� r+ iF �.tit'=at-[:I• +• House Rear/Side—Foundation Repair Area Page 3 of 4 l A� 'IS ���� . o� A,Rpe�je �.on►n9 $aasd Approved Garage on Property—Looking North West ti r. House Front—Old Masonry Foundation for Original Porch Page 4 of 4 70 -n m .3 -n Ort 0 ofl tA Cr (A > 0 Cl- m E 0 CD z 0 CL 7Q (D -130al >E L/I n CD mGl I (D LA CD m -n m m GT I m a -n -n 0 c m /-a ;u �_r 0 0 7, Z Z I e m in G) Ln m m 0 m zf Irn _ a m Ul It f4e Ln t-J -3 ul ` �,104 ►'• Q n Gl m -p m M m m .i.-- O I G C) O O rt o zs Imo ' �� ._• .' CL - - -.�.__.. . - -� - -_. —'- •-• -- ---- - ;a, �.:ate�1 4-1 LD 1`,, W �,�'rl•'•t !� M�—.;�.. 1 _'A f C7 -I all m as •'n b 0 ,� i f J J � In rn U N r 17 3 __ 1 y-4 �-- 1 i J• r! 47