The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About8024-Mebonia application Received TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MAY 16 2025 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SOUTHOLD,N.Y. Zoning Board of Appeals NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: February 20, 2025 RENEWED: May 6, 2025 AMENDED: May 6, 2025 AMENDED: May 13, 2025 TO: Joan Chambers (Mebonia) PO Box 49 Southold,NY 11971 Please take notice that your application dated December 2, 2024: For permit: to legalize an"as built" deck addition to an existing sin le-famil i dwellin at: Location of property: 53750 CR 48 Southold.NY County Tax Map No. 1000— Section 52 Block 2 Lot 17 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: The"as built" construction on this nonconforming 4,500 s . ft. lot in the R-40 District is not permitted pursuant to Article XXIII Section 280-124 which states lots measuring less than 20,000 square feet in total size require a secondgH front yard setback of 20 feet and maximum lot coverage of 20%. The secondM front yard setback(Beverly Road is at .7 feet and the lot coverage is at 38.7%. This Notice of Disapproval has been revised based on the survey last dated April 16, 2025. Authorized ii nature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file, Z.B.A. APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS gM AREA VARIANCE ��') House No.53750 Street CR 48 Hamlet Southold Received SCTM 1000 Section: 52 Block: 2 Lot(s) 17 Lot Size: 4,500 Zone R 40 MAY 16 2025 I(WE) APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDIRwkppeals DATED 5/0WHASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 12-27-21 Owner(s): Tamar Mebonia Mailing Address: 53750 CR 48,Southold Telephone:646-678-8298 Fax: Email: tamuna2l@gmail.com NOTE:In addition to the above.please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:Patricia C. Moore for(X)Owner( ) Other: Address: 51020 Main Road Southold NY 11971 Telephone: (631)765-4330 Fax: (631)765-4643 Email: octnoore(ii),mooreatlys.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names: ( )Applicant/Owner(s), (X )Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 12-27-21 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 12-2-24 FOR: (X )Building Permit ( ) Certificate of Occupancy ( )Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( ) Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XX H Section: 280-124 Subsection: An Appeal is made for: (X )A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map.Reconstructed preexisting deck: Beverly Road-.6 Old Cove Blvd.Secondary front yard 28', Rear Yard 18.5,and 38.8%lot coverage ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law- Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Request for Reversal or Overturn the Zoning Officer's Denial Other A prior appeal( X) has, ( )has not been made at any time with respect to this vroverty,UNDER Appeal No(s).#1939 dated 1979 Year(s)Denied and#1975 dated 1975 Denied Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our off ce for assistance) Page 2, Area Variance Application Revised 6/2023 MAY 16 2025 REASONS FOR APPEAL Zoning Board of Appeals (Please be specific,additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: Beverly Road and Old Cove Boulevard is a"U"shaped private road which connects to CR 48. The neighborhood contains preexisting nonconforming lots and homes developed prior to zoning. The parcel is on a lot which is 50' x 90' in size.The house and the lot are preexisting nonconforming. The house is on a corner lot with three roads and three"front yards", Old Cove Boulevard right of way is partially on the parcel(10')along the rear yard. The 20' right of way is shared by three other homes. Two of the homes front CR 48 and use 10' of Old Cove Boulevard for their driveway and parallel parking. One neighbor has their boat parked at the end of the right of way. The parcel has almost no usable yard,the prior owner built the elevated deck next to Beverly Road as a sitting area with views of the pond. The preexisting nonconforming elevated deck was replaced by the owner in kind and in place,unaware that replacing an existing structure required a permit and variance. The owner purchased the property from the bank after a foreclosure,and the house required a lot of deferred maintenance. They had been the tenants in the house prior to their purchase so they knew the condition of the house and the repairs needed,however they did not know that there were no permits or a pre-CO. The prior owners and bank had no permits for any of the existing structures. They have cleaned up the property,they applied for a pre-CO and obtained building permits for old work performed by the previous owner(after 1957). The accessary apartment does not exist. What is believed to be a former garage was converted to living space by the prior owner many years ago and has since been corrected with permits. Enclosed is a floor plan of the existing house. The structure had no permits prior to the applicant's purchase of the property. The two homes to the east are also preexisting nonconforming. Only one of the parcels has any permits, it was for the replacement of one window. The three homes are similarly situated on their properties. The applicants have cleaned up the property. The prior owners died with a significant reverse mortgage which was foreclosed. Resulting in the applicant's application for permits and now a variance. The previously existing deck appears on the photographs taken by the bank(Exhibit A). The deck had gotten old, and the handrails were not safe,the owner replaced the deck in kind and in place(new wood). The deck is the only outdoor living space on the property. The deck has been in place as long as most of the homes in this neighborhood. The three similar homes have decks in their side yards(visible but predating permits) 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance,because: The deck provides water views. The house is compact and there is almost no outdoor living area other than the deck over a preexisting concrete patio. The house takes up most of the parcel. The front yard is not suitable to sit in because the house is close to CR 48, a very busy road in the summer. The front of the house is not used by the family. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: The lot coverage and setbacks are substantial because of the preexisting lot size(4,500 SF)and preexisting structures. This block predates zoning. The road frontage parcels were originally zoned commercial(motel use). The zoning is now residential,but the lots are substantially under the one-acre zoning. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: The deck is over a concrete patio. The deck gives the owner waterfront views to(George Sullivan Beach)Town Beach and the pond. The house is on the comer of CR 48, so the front of the house is not desirable as a place to sit or relax. The rear yard contains the Old Cove Boulevard(a right of way). This elevated deck was built by the prior owner(or earlier)because it is the only area which functioned as a comfortable sitting area for the house. 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self created? { } Yes, or {X )No Why: The original structure was preexisting, constructed by prior owners,and applicant replaced the structure in kind and in place. ■ Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? {X }No { )Yes(fte,�j�Cpis] d a copy) fflGl�C�V Gl� • This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and pm&Yt lhi1 2025 character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and welfare of the community. Zoning Board of Appeals By signing this document,the PROPERTY OWNER understands that pursuant to Chapter 280- 146(B)of the Code of the Town of Southold,any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three(3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1)year terms. IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE REQUIRED TIME FRAME DESCRIBED HEREIN. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Sworn to before me this_day of , 20 om Notary Public MADISON MESSINA NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Registration No.01 ME6370536 Qualified in Suffolk County Commission Expires February 5,20 Zoning Board of Appealsl t�, APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION D[`� Receive APPLICANT: Tamar Mebona SCTM No. 1000-52-02-21 1. For Demolition of Existing Building Areas-deck replaced in kind and in place. MAY 16 2025 Zoning Board of Appeals 2. Please describe areas being removed: 11.8'x 10.2' deck replaced in kind and in place. t II.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: 11.8 x 10.8 deck Dimensions of new second floor: none Dimensions of floor above second level: none Height(from existing natural grade): 8' Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed? yes,p g natural existing grade to first floor:n/a If es lease provide height above ground)measured from III.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BEFORE Alterations: same Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: 1V. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage, plane(From Surveyor,Design Professional): s Existing square footage of buildings on your property: Proposed increase of building coverage: no change 1'749 Square footage of your lot: 4,500 SF ~~ Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area(lot coverage) 38.8% Gross Floor Area GFA of single family dwelling including the attached garage and/or habitable detach accessory structure: (Please refer to Chapter 280, Section 280-207 of the Town Code): ed No change For Residential lots,is project within the allowable 5ky Plane?(Please refer to Chapter 280, Section 28 - the Town Code): no change 0 208 of V.Purpose of New Construction: replaced existing deck VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded,marsh area,etc.)on your la nd if how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Describe on separate page needand flat p ged: Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after stakin corners f new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. g or QUESTIONNAIRE Revised 6/2023 FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA.APPLICATION �O RECe11�P A. Is the subject premises currently Iisted on the real estate market for sale? Yes x No MAY 16 2025 B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? Zoning Board of Appeals x No Yes,please explain on separate sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses?no 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted with this application?n/a 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland bu _ilding area? 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the 0 ice of the SGAiRD OF TRUSTEES for its determination of jurisdiction? Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Board of Trustees: If issued,please attach copies of your permit listing conditions of approval with a copy the approved survey. of D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? no E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? no If any of the aforementioned items exist on your property,please show them on a site plan. F. Are there any construction projects currently in process on your property?yes If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building De artment and please des ibe scope of work: interior re110vations with Building Permit G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If none exist,please apply to the Building Department to obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. See attached H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel?no If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey and identify the Suffolk County Tax Map No. I. Please list present use or operations conducted at your property, and/or the proposed use existing house with as built deck(REPLACED) J• (examples:existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other) 5' signature Authorized /-7 Date Y4��5uFF�[xC�,. Town of Southolu +►� °� �S 53095 Main Rd 1/20/2022 ?cm : Southold,New York 11971 W Receive MAY 16 2025 PRE EXISTING zoning Board of APPa No: 42695 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Date: 1/10/2022 THIS CERTIFIES that the structure(s)located at: 53750 CR 48, Southold SCTM#: 473889 SecBlock/Lot: 52.-2-17 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the requirements for a built prior to APRIL 9, 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z- 42695 dated 1/10/2022 was issued and conforms to all the requriements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: woad frame sin le famil j welliT12 with covered Dorch and attached Violation: Buildin ermits are re luired for conversion of a seasonal dwell dwellin210in 260 to ear round sin !e famil deck aver concrete atio front ent deck and ram conversion of attached ara a to habitable s ace and accesso a artment. The certificate is issued to Praetz, Gloria of the aforesaid building. (OWNER) SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AppROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO.. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED- }, - y *PLEASE SEE ATT�' CHEDJNSPEf TION REPORT. L *U0ignature I BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD HOT7SlNG CODE INSPECTION REPORT Received LOCATION: 53750 CR 48, Southold SUFF.CO.TAX MAP NO.: 52.-2-17 MAY 16 2025 NAME OF OWNER(S): Praetz,Gloria SUBDIVISION: � OCCUPANCY: fl ning eats ADMITTED BY: SOURCE OF REQUEST: Praetz, Gloria DATE: 1/10/2022 DWELLING: — #STORIES: #EXITS: 2 FOUNDATION: BATHROOM(S): — _ CELLAR: CRAWL SPACE: PORCH TYPE: TOILET ROOfIM(S): UTILITY ROOM(S): BREEZEWAY: DECK TYPE: ~--�-- - PATIO TYPE: FIREPLACE: DOMESTIC HOTWATER: GARAGE: TYPE HEAT: TYPE HEATER: �� AIR CONDITIQNING: WARM AIR: ----� #BEDROOMS: HOT WATER: OTHER: #KITCHENS' BASEMENT TYPE: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES: GARAGE,TYPE OF CONST: SWIMMING POOL: � STORAGE,TYPE OF CONST: OTHER: ---- GUEST,TYPE OF CONST: — -- VIOLATIONS: — As per Southold Town Code 144-8 the following items require building permits: y ~~ Conversion of a seasonal dwelling(260)to year round single family dwelling(210),deck over concrete front entry deck and ramp,conversion of attached garage to habitable space and accessory patio,apartment. REMARKS: INSPECTED BY:-- JOHNJ DATE OF INSPECTION: 1/18/2022 TIME START: 2:07p — m END: 2:47pm r r i 04 Received TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPT.MAY 16 2025 765-1802 ` , _ Zoning Board of Appeals INSPECTION I ] FOUNDATION 1ST I ] ROUGH PLBG. I ] FOUNDATION 2ND ( ] INSULATIOWCAULKING ( ] FRAMING/STRAPPING [ ] FINAL I ] .FIREPLACE & CHIMNEY [ ] FIRE SAFETY INS I ] FIRE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION I ] FIRE RESISTANT PENETRATION I ] ELECTRICAL (ROUGH) I ] LECTRICAL FIN I ] CODE VIOLATION (FINAL) ( PRE C/O �f� r REMpR S. - uo+ �� om Out %' lift, tw [. z Y r DATE V INSPE DR � "' TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW yORH ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS nnT .. 2� Orig. Hearing-ng- 8/22/74 1974 Appeal No. 19 3 9 Dated July 31, 1974 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD �Jw' TOEdward & Gloria Praetz North Road & Beverly Road Appellant Southold New Yorl � at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on 4 ce the appeal was considered and the action indicated below was taken on yourember 12, 1 7 ( ) R access t°Request for variance due to lack of your property MAY 16 2025 ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (� Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( ) Zoning Board of Appeals 1. SPMAL J�'XOEP""ON.By resolution of the Board it was determined ~� granted [ J be denied that a special exception ( ) be pursuant t°Article ................... Section • of the Zoning ....... ........ 8»bsecti°n ordinance paragraph and the decision of the Building inspector ( ) be reversed ( ) be e°nfirrued because Fraeta, North 8:15 Pand Beverl'T.) upon application of Edward & Gloria accordance with the zoning Ordinance,Southold, for a variance in and Bulk Schedule for aAxticle I22, Section 100-34 with reduced, setbaek in ont1On to construct addition to dwelling property: North Road f o7 Y on Private Road. Location of cn the north b ) and Beverly Road, Southold, bounded west by Beverly Road R�dj7} ; east by Brady; South by Gisaitis; 2. YAItIANGE• By resolution of the Board :t was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (w°idd not) produce hardship because practical difficulties or unnecessary SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike In the immediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the change the character of the district becausC Ordinance and (would) (would not) SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building Inspect°,( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. SEE REVERSE FQRM ZB4 C$ G �McDermott' airi�aa r 0i Aou 3 j or Secretary After investigation and inspection the Board = applicant requests permission to construct additiontosdwthat elling with reduced setback on Private Road (front yard) , located on North Road (CR 27) and Beverly Road, Southold. The findings Of the Board are that to acid this addition would result in too much lot coverage according to the Zoning ordinance; and would create a hazardous would obstruct the view c condition concerning traffic as it oming in from Beverly Road. The Board finds that strict application of the ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or the hardship created is not unique ue of hardship; properties alike in the immediate vicinityewould he shared by all and in the same use district; and the this property change the of the Ordinance. , w character t$e neighborhood and i variance ill not observe the spirit 53750 THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Gloria & Edward ,7. Pzaetz, constructtadditionSto dwelling withkreduced setback in be DENIEI] permission to on Private Road, located on North Road (CR 27] and Beverly yard Road, Southold, as applied for, for the reasons stated. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs: Gi ispieei n Doyen. Hem V e� MAY 16 2025 Zoning Board of Appeals TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEW yORK DATE Dec...,.1g, 1974 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Public Hearing: 12/5/74 Appeal No. 1975 Dated November 13, 1974 nn� ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLDY' To Gloria & Edward J. Praetz 53750 North Road �'"®ecejN!'e,(i Appeuant f at a meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on ty4fl+�f—D_�► ` December 19, 1974 yVji-11 ,� V LUL� was considered and the action indicated below was taken On your the appeal ( ) Request for variance due to lack of access to property Zoning Board of Appeals ( ) Request for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance (X) Request for a variance to the Zoning Ordinance L SPECIAL EXCEPTION,By resolution of the Board it was determia granted ed that a sPe'cial exception { ] ( ) be denied pursuant to Article .................... Seetlon Susubsectionbe .......... of the Zen .................... paragraph Zoning Ordinance and the decision of the Building Inspector { ) be reversed ( ) be confirmed because 9:15 P.M. (E.S,T,) upon application of Gloria & Edward 3. Praetz, 53750 North Road, Southold, New York for a variance in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-34 and Bulk Schedule for permission to construct addition to dwelling with reduced setback. Location of property: North Road (CR 27) and Beverly Road, Southold, New York, bounded on the north by North Road (CR 27) ; east by D. Brady; south by R.O.w. Meissnest; west by Private Road-Beverly Road. Fee paid $15.00. 2. VARIANCE.By resolution of the Board it was determined that (a) Strict application of the Ordinance (would) (would not) produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship because SEE REVERSE (b) The hardship created (is) (is not) unique and (would) (would not) be shared by all properties alike In the irnmediate vicinity of this property and in the same use district because SEE REVERSE (c) The variance (does) (does not) observe the spirit of the Ordinance and (would) (would not) change the character of the district because SEE REVERSE and therefore, it was further determined that the requested variance ( ) be granted ( ) be denied and that the previous decisions of the Building'Inspector( ) be confirmed ( ) be reversed. SEE REVEICSE APPRQVED °� FORM ZB4 G BOARD OF � 4 'LS �. �� Ohailmarl f Marjo a iiSCBermott, Secretary '�Ae�la After investigation and inspection the Board finds that applicant requests permission dwelling with reduced to construct addition to to located at forth Road (CR 27) and Beverly Road, Southold, New York. The findings of the Board are that the area of the lot occupied by applicant's build4kng exceeds the 20% allowed. Also, applicant has considerably less than the 30 foot radius requirement at the intersection dwellingvate wouldoad and furtherOlimit visibility,addition to The Board finds that strict application of the Ordinance would not produce practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship; the hardship created is not shared unique and would be thisproperty and pintthe same usedist immediate vicinity of h will change the character of the neighborhood, and the will not Observe the spirit of the Ordinance. THEREFORE IT WAS RESOLVED, Gloria & Edward J. Praetx, 53750 North Road, Southold, New York, be DENIED permission to construct addition to dwelling with reduced setback, as applied for, for the reasons stated at the public hearing held December 5, 1974. Vote of the Board: Ayes:- Messrs. s e Grigonis, Doyen. meCrlVoerrgen, MAY 16 2025 �A Zoning Board of Appeals �33 Received AY 6 Tamar Mebonia 1000-52-2-17(corner of 53750 CR 48 &Beverly Road)-open�deck 2025 3 road fwntages: Zoning Board of Appeals A. CR 48 (facing front of house); B. Proposed deck-Secondary front yard Beverly Road (private right of way)- .6 C. Proposed deck-Old Cove Boulevard (private right of way): 18.5'to right of way/28.5' to property line aria cas on Old C Beve L a e reexfstingl #6605 on 11-15-12, TM#52-2-14 400 Old Cove Road- new house-bulkhead setback 50' #6476 on 7-7-11 TM#52-2-14 400 Old Cove Road- denied setback to bulkhead 35' NIA #3855 6-29-89 TM#52-2-39 80 Beverly Road deck 35'to bulkhead NIA #3772 10-26-88 TM#52-2-10.1 160 Old Cove Blvd. deck 18'to bulkhead - N fb #3706 2-2-88 TM#52-2-3 Carol Road garage addition setback&lot coverage(@21%) variances #365610-8-87 TM#52-2-7.4 230 Carol Road garage addition setback&lot coverage variances (7.5 and 7 setbacks) 23.8% lot coverage #3583 2-5-87 TM#52-2-4 90 Carol Road garage addition setback variances 03 7e6 Ree' ved MAY 16 2025 Zoning Board of Appeals • r v Southold Town Board of Appeals '�►1 �� MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SDUTHOLD, L.f., N.Y. 11971 TELEPHONE (516)765-1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3706 Received Application Dated December 18, 1987 ( l TO: ��p Patricia C. Moore, Esq. [°��AV@4] I Edson & Bruer as Attorneys for MANFRED E. KUERNER Main Road, Box 1466 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on ,February 2, 1988, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [Xl Request for Variance to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 1002-31 and Article XI, Section 100-119. [ ] Request for Application of MANFRED E. KUERNER. Variances to the Zoning Ordi- nance, Articles III, Section O -3 , and XI, Section 100-119.2 for permission to construct additions to existing dwelling with a reduced southerly sideyard setback, insufficient total sideyards , excessive lot coverage and with an insufficient setback from bulkhead along "Old Cove" at Arshamomaque. Location of Property: East Side of Carole Road, Southold, NY, County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52-2-3. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on January 14, 1988 in the Matter of the Application for MANFRED E. KUERNER under Appl . No. 3706, and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1 . The premises in question is 5,000 sq. ft. described parcel of land located along the east side of Carole Road (a private road) with frontage of 50.0 feet along Carole Road and along "Old Cove" or "Arshamomaque Pond," Southold. 2. The subject premises is located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District, is identified on the Suffolk County Tax Maps as District 1000, Section 52 , Block 2, Lot 3, and is improved with a single-family , one-story dwelling as shown by copy of survey mapped April 3, 1981 , by Roderick VanTuyl , P. C. , Licensed Land Surveyors, to be set back 24± feet from Carole Road, 25± feet from the bulkhead, 5J± feet from the most north- easterly sideyard and ll± feet from the most northwesterly side- yard, and 16± feet from the southerly sideyard (at its closest point) . (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: February 2, 1988. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) Rage 2 - Appl . No. 3706 Matter of MANFRED E. KUERNER Decision Ren erect February 2, 1988 3. By this application, appellant requests the following relief to construct two separate additions: (a) for a 7 ft. x 28 ft. addition at the rear of the existing dwelling [to the east]: [1] insufficient northerly sideyard setback at 31 Receive(i feet, reduced from the present nonconforming 52± setback; and [2] insufficient setback from the existing bulkhead MAY 16 2025 along "Old Cove" at 15 feet, reduced seven feet from the exist- ing nonconforming setback (which scales out to 25 feet when Zoning Board of Appeals using the April 3, 1981 survey), and along an angle; [3] insufficient total sideyards reduced to a setback t z exclusive of the e f feet relief requested for the 6southerly ssideyard) ; (b) for a 10 ft. x 22 ft. addition at the south of the existing dwelling: [l] insufficient southerly sideyard at six feet [reduced 10 feet from the present 16 ft. setback]; [2] insufficient total sideyards reduced to a setback at six feet, for a total of 111 feet (51 feet existing and exclusive of the relief requested for the northerly side yard) ; (c) lot coverage for both additions in excess of the maximum 20% permitted, for a total lot coverage of 1 ,264 sq. ft. , or 25.3% [196 sq. ft. for the easterly rear addition and 220 sq. ft. for the southerly addition]; 4. Article III, Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code requires minimum sideyards at 10 and 15 feet, for a total of not less than 25 feet for both sideyards, and maximum lot coverage at 20 percent. 5. Article XI, Section 100-119.2(B) requires all build- ings and structures located on lots adjacent 'to tidal water bodies other than the Long Island Sound to be set back not less than seventy-five (75) feet from the ordinary highwater mark of such tidal water body, or not less than seventy-five feet from the landward edge of the tidal wetland, whichever is the greater distance. 6. The Courts have held that the area setback variance must meet the "practical difficulties" standard, considering at least the following: (a) the relief requested is nut sub- stantial in relation to the requirements; (b) the project as proposed is not out of character with the neighborhood; the circumstances of the property are unique and are not (c) eson in nature; (d) the variance will not in turn be adverse tortheal safety, health, comfort, convenience or order of the town, (e) the variance requested shall be the minimal necessary; (f) there is no other method feasible for appellant to pursue other than a variance. Page 3 - Appi . No. 3706 Matter of MANFRED E. KUERNER Decision Rendered rebruary , 1988 7. The percentages of relief requested by this application �,' 1•� � are substantial in relation to the current zoning requirements. 8. In considering this application, the Board als Received and determines : o finds (a) the setbacks of the existing dwelling are presently MAY 16 2025 nonconforming; Zoning Board of Appeals (b) the difficulties claimed are unique to the property, Particularly due to its nonconforming size. (c) the immediate area does consist of other lots with similar situations, however, the setbacks of the two neighboring properties from their existing bulkheads to the dwellings are at 23 feet and 30.7 feet [now Stewart and Hribok], and the premises further north [now Smulcheski] having a setback from the bulkhead at 26.5± feet. The closest setback from the bulkhead was found to be that of Ippolito, four lots to the north of the subject premises, at 17 feet. (e) the area consists of dwellings with nonconforming sideyards , ranging from 5.5 feet, and greater. (f) the grant of the relief requested for the easterly rear addition is out of character with the area and will create further nonconformities, adverse to the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance; (9) there is no other method feasible for appellants to pursue other than a variance, except for a second-story addition; (h) the relief requested as to the easterly (rear) yard and northerly side yard setbacks are not the minimal necessary; (i ) the "practical difficulties" test has not been sufficiently satisfied as required by law to permit the entire relief requested by this application; W in considering this two-fold application, the interests of justice will be served by granting the southerly garage addition, and denying the easterly addition, as applied, without prejudice and as further noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Mr. Goehringer, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the 10 ft. x 22 ft. southerly addition, in the Matter of the Application of MANFRED E. KUERNER, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 • That two eight-foot wide overhead doors be placed on the west end and east end of the proposed garage addition, Page 4 - Appl . No, 3706 Matter of MANFRED E. KUERNER Decision Rendered February 2, 1988 L�� r and operable at all times (in order to gain access by emer- gency fire vehicles from the water side) ; Receives 2. That the southerly sideyard MAY 16 2025 area remain open and unobstructed at all times at the requested six feet; Zoning Board of Appeals 3. t the total six feet andfive-andone-hal r one-half feet, for ads remain t total the rofu III efeet; 4. That the lot coverage be permitted to be increased to allow for this 220 sq. ft. garage addition (for a total lot coverage of 1 ,088 sq. ft. ) exclusive of accessory shed, if any; 5. That the garage addition not exceed 12 feet (one-story) in height; and it was FURTHER RESOLVED, that the 7 ft. x 28 ft. easterly addition be and hereby is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (to further application) . Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Douglass and Sawicki . (Member Doyen of Fishers Island was absent. ) This resolution was duly adopted. 1 k �d�:»�_�a. ��:•:�.: a�*-ram/ GER RD P. GOEHRINGER, Al MAN ECEIVED AND FILED BY Tiilr SOUTIIOLD i-j"lid C;I D KI fDATE Z/`vlc� FOUIi Town Clerk, Town of Southold Received a MAY 16 2025 NZoning Board of. Appeals �' •i- � n � (b P 0. 0 � w f m° j . o mh ' f rt b u b .1 � E R4, -q . III-fill + J ;4 A d o o to v 50• 4,11� + o - 4l N _ ____mow vi---------- --- -- �- �prrva�,$) CAQpLE 20A�� • N SO O � - = TRANSCRIPT O1t7 HEARING .Y SOUTHOLD •TOWN HOARD OF .APPR CeIVed REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 16 2025 THQRSDAY, JANUARY 14, 1988 Zoning Board of Appeals Appl. no. : 370.6 Applieant(s).: MANFRED E. KUERNER .Location of Property: Els Carole Road, Southold County Tax hap ID No. 1000- 52 . 2 -. 3 Board !!sobers pr9sent. Chairman Goehringec P. Goehringer, Members: Grigonis..and. Sawicki,. Absent;. Doyen and Douglass. Also Present:- ' Victor Leonard (Building 'Dept. ) , Linda Kowalski, Z.B.A. Secretary and approximately . persons in the audience. The- Chairman opened the hearing at 8:00 o'clock p.m. and read the notice of hearing and application for the record. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: 1 have a copy of survey produced by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. dated (most recently) ,April 3, 1981 indicating two penned in areas approximately on the sodth. .side which appears to be a garage addition of 10 by 22 and a rearyard addition of 7 by 28. And I have a copy of the Suffolk County Tax Map indicating this and surrounding properties in the area. Would you--like to be heard Ms. Moore? MS. MOORE: I'd like to introduce Mrs. Wuerner and James Kuerner Mr. Kuerner could not be here and he apologizes for it. I do have a package of material that would be easier rather than my walking back and forth. As the application states, the Kuerner family would like to expand their 28 by 31h foot house by adding a garage and their addition. The 'difficulty encountered here is due to the fact that part of the lot is only 50 by 100. You can see by the first exhibit which is a map of Old Cove Colony which shows the original subdivision. I circled in red the correct lots because the tax lot number and the subdivision number do not corrolate. So it's lot number two of the Old Cove Colony subdivision, in addition to having a 50 by 100 lot, it is also reduced =by a twenty-foot wide right-of-way that crosses along the Length of the subdivision. So in addition to having less room for actual living area, there is less room for setbacks and so on. _ They are faced with limitations in the expansion because of the physical condition of Mrs. Kuerner . She allowed me to explain to the Board that she is suffering from arthritis of the spine and can not use stairs. The exhibit which is the second exhibit of a survey which was already in your file. The third exhibit is a copy of the Department of Environmental Conservation original application which is dated December 16, 1982. They had originally hoped to expand up- ward and therefore, not needing this setback variance or at least not • Page 2 - January 14, 198�� - Manf re E. Kuerner R�CeI�/� PUBLIC HEARING Southold Town Board of Appeals MS. MOORE (continued) : MAY 16 2025 the one that is applied for. And because of the physi9%1Mb9flff1t016Vp81 Mrs. Kuerner , they found that they could not expand upward. The only alternative to them at that point was to expand towards the water. What I then did was I applied to the D.E.C. and we received a non-juris- diction determination September 23, 1987 and that is the fourth exhibit that is in the package. The variances that we request are not unreason- able and are in conformity with the character of the neighborhood. The fifth exhibit which shows, I drew out what would be the subdivision and the properties along Troul Road. You can see that the Stewart property received an addition of 8 by 22. We are asking for an addition of 7 by 22. So we are asking for less than what the adjacent property received. The Reebok application which I was before this Board on, requested a garage extension of 10 by 24. Mr. and Mrs. Kuerner would like a garage of 10 by 22. So again, that is less than what adjacent properties are asking. Mr. and Mrs. Reebok were able to get a second story and there- fore, did not need further necroachment towards the water other than just a deck. Then again, Mr. and Mrs. Smalczewski applied for a garage ex- tension as well and that was a 10 by 24 garage extension. Again, less than what we are asking for. Excuse me. We are asking for less than what the Smalczewski's property owners received. The Potts again, also asked for a garage extension and received their approval for a 10 by 24 garage. And finally, Eppalito which was here before this Board approxi- mately a month ago, two months ago, received an addition at on point, of 12 by 28 and that was going further toward the water than we are along with a garage addition that had been given a previous appeal. So we are in conformity with the neighborhood. We are not asking for anything that is more than anyone else asks. In fact, we are actually much more reasonable than what other applications had requested. What I did, the following exhibit is a drawing showing a 31 by 28 foot house with the addition of 7 by 28 and the garage of 10 by 22 to clarify the request. For those of ;you who were not able to go up and make an inspection of the property or if all of you have made inspection of the property, I point out that the following photograph or photocopy of the photograph shows that all the properties are in line along the frontyard. So that are request is, again, similiar to and at the same distance of all the other properties in the area. Andi.you can see that by my label- ling of the various property owners and looking down from the Reebok's home down along the north side seeing that all the properties were at the same setback line. And finally, there are two letters here. One from each adjacent property owner that says they support the Kuerner application. This application is one of the last ones of the area. Everyone else seems to have expanded their property. Mr. and Mrs. Kuerner at this point, have requested this variance. And again, it is in conformity with the neighborhood. We have needed a variance from the lot coverate requirement due to the width of the garage, the house and all other structures. All together, all structures, all ex- isting and conforming structures will be only be 26% lot coverage and that's only 6% over what is the requirement. So again, that is rea- sonable. That is all I have and we hope that you will grant the vari- ance application. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well, there's always questions. You know that. MS. MOORE: Of course. Mrs. Kuerner is here: t, ' Pagel 3 - January 14, 19 PUBLIC HEARING - Manfred E. Kuerner Received al Southold Town Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: How much do you exceed the lot coverage ?l62025 MS. MOORE: Based on my calculations, 6%. Zoning Board of Appeals CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: So it's a 26% lot coverage. And with some of the prior applibations, we had discussed the possibility of two ga- rage doors. There 's no problem with that? MS. MOORE: No. They were aware of that and it was agreed. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Would there be an existing foundation under the addition or would it be a crawl space? MS. MOORE: It would be a crawl space. It's already a twelve foot crawl space under the existing house. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: You'd just carry that through. You will be making the addition a living area though? MS. MOORE: Yes. I have a plan which I hesitate to submit for the record because it may not be the plan that they use. In other words, it's drawn up by one builder. They may not be using that builder. So if you would like to see as far as what their plans are. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Just let me take a look and we'll give it back. MS. MOORE: As it states on the plan, it's for the use of this builder only. There was one other question I wanted to ask you. First, I want to thank you for giving us the other appeal numbers so that we don't have to look them up manually. And secondly, is the 7 foot, do you need all of the 7 foot Mrs. Kuerner in reference into the depth of the addition? Do you need a full 7 feet? MRS. KUERNER Well, originally we were going to put in a sliding door on the side. So we asked for 7 feet so we would have 6 feet ac- tually which we'd put in a 5 foot slider. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: In the corner here right adjacent to the garage. MRS. KUERNER But then we thought it wasn't such a good idea to come out right there where the garage door would be. So I would say no. It' s not absolutely necessary. MS. MOORE: However, it is less than all the other appeals. I think you'll see that 8 feet has been the general rule of thumb and we are asking for less than that. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: The only thing is that as you progressively go out the peninsula, it appears that you end up with less property on the parcels that are physically there. I realize that we have a sur- vey here but the peninsula appears to narrow as it goes out farther. So it gives you the impression that when you're looking at it as " :. Pag,a 4 - January 14, 194� r� PUBLIC HEARING - Manfred E. Kuerner �1eC�lue� Southold Town Board of Appeals MAY 16 2025 o CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER (continued) : actually having less Zoning Board of Appeals Property than the neighbors that go down a little farther to the north, MRS. KUERNER : It does look that way because the Baron's house is not built the same as all the others. It 's built the other way around. It does look that way. CHAIRMAN GOEHRINGER: Well, we'll go down and check it out one more time before we make a decision. Thank you, Is there bod who would like to speak in favor of this application? aAnybodyelse like to speak against the application? Questions from Board members? Hearing no further questions, I 'll make a motion closing the hearing and reserving decision until. later. All in favor - AYE. BY IL es: V"/fl IV+C" . 'deceived 16 2025 Zoning Board of Appeals Southold Town Board of Appeals MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD, LR866 RO TELEPHONE(5161 765.1809 1. MAY 16 2025 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Appeal No. 3656 Zoning Board of Appeals Application Dated July 28, 1987 TO: Gary Flanner Olsen, Esq. [Appellant(s)] As Attorney for NICHOLAS IPPOLITO Main Road, Box 706 Cutchogue, NY 11935 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on October 8, 1987, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ ] Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [x] Request for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2 [ ] Request for Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO for Variances to the Zoning Ordinance, Article^` III, Section 100-31, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2, for permission to construct garage addition to dwelling with an insufficient southerly sideyard setback, insuffi- cient total sideyards, insufficient setback from bulkhead along Arshamomaque Pond, and excessive lot coverage. Location of Property: 230 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-052-02-007. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on August 20, 1987 in the Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO, under Appl. No. 3656; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. By this application, appellant requests Variances from the Provisions of Article III, Section 100-31, and Bulk Schedule, and Article XI, Section 100-119.2, for permission to construct 12' by 25' garage addition at the south- erly side yard area with setbacks at 211 and 3 feet from the south property line, 27±feet from the existing bulkhead (along Old Cove), and with a total lot coverage at 23.8 percent, all as more particularly shown on survey amended August 7, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 2. The premises in question is located along the east side of Carole Road (a private road) at Arshamomaque, Southold, contains a total lot area of 5500 sq. ft. and lot width (frontage) of 50 feet. 3. The subject premises is improved with a single-family dwelling set back a distance of 25 feet from the easterly side of Carole Road, 45 feet from the front property line (along the westerly side of Carole Road), 17t feet from the existing bulkhead, and sideyards at 7 ft. and 141g ft. (CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO) DATED: October 8, 1987. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Form ZB4 (rev. 12/81) Page 2 - Appl. No. 3656 Matter of NICHOLIS IPPOLITO Decision Rendered October 8, 1987 4. Article III, Section 100-31, Bulk Schedule, of the Zoning Cade requires a minimum sideyard setback at not less than 10 ft. and 15 ft., or the established, whichever is less; total sideyards at 25 feet, or the established, whichever is less; not less than 75 feet from the bulkhead,or the established, whichever is less; lot coverage at 20% or the establi Med. O- 5. The relief requested by this application are as follows: (a) e eeive existing conforming sideyard setback at the south side to be reduced to 3 ft. and 2'k ft. (at its closest point), and total sideyards at 10 feet [7' + 2 'MAY 16 2025 (b) setback from the existing bulkhead at 27± feet [which is more than the existing established setback at 17± feet]; the maximum 20% limitation, or 208 sq. ft. (c) lot coverage at 3.8Y over Zoning Board of Appeals 6. It is noted for that record that: (a) by prior Appl. No. 2317. a conditional variance was rendered August 4, 1977 in which applicant set-off the subject parcel in question from the property to the northwest and north, now or formerly of H. Haas, and the subject structure was to be used only for single-family residential use starting January 1, 1978. and the building was to conform to the Southold Town Codes with respect to minimum floor area. (b) vn October 21, 1982, a rearyard variance was granted under Appl. No. 3044 concerning "Parcel 1" [the subject parcel] for permission to construct an addition to existing single-family dwelling with a limitation of 20% lot coverage, as noted therein. (c) on August 22, 1985, a conditional variance va:5 rendered under Appl. No. 3377 in the separation of the subject 5500 sq. ft. parcel from the westerly abutting parcel, "Parcel 2," now of 17,000 sq. ft., and requiring each parcel be limited to sin le-family dwelling use [prohibiting the reestablishment of the previously existing nonconforming motel use]. 7. It is the opinion of this Board that the preexisting circumstances of the premises and preexisting building lend to the unique difficulties created; and there is no other method feasible for appellant to pursue other than variances. 8• In passing upon this application, the Board has further determined: (a) the relief requested is not substantial in relation to the existing (as established); (b) the project as proposed will not be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, convenience, or order of the town; (c) the circumstances are not personal in nature and are directly related to the property; (d) there will not be an increase in density created by the grant Of this variance since the premises contains an existing single-family dwelling and the use will not be changed; (e) the project as proposed is not out of character with the neighborhood; (f) that in view of all the above factors, the interests of justice will be served by granting the relief, as noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Douglass, seconded by Messrs. Doyen and Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested under Appeal No. 3656 in the Appl. No. 3656 Matter of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO Decision Rendered October 8, 1987 ❑D)_q Matter of the Application of NICHOLAS IPPOLITO in the proposed construction R e ceive of a 12' by 25' garage addition, SLTJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. That two eight-foot wide overhead doors be placed on the west MAY 16 2025 end and east end of the proposed garage addition (in order to gain access by emergency fire vehic, and operable at all times les from the water side);> Zoning Board of Appeals 2. That the northerly sideyard area remain open and unobstructed at all times at the existing setback at 72 feet and 7 feet as shown by survey amended August 7, 1987, prepared by Roderick VanTuyl, P.C. 3. That the lot coverage not exceed 23.8% as requested, which prohibits further lot coverage by new construction without a variance. 4. That the setbacks not be further reduced to less than that applied for and that the garage addition not be converted to habitable quarters (as Proposed herein). Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Doyen, Douglass and Grigonis. (Member Sawicki was absent.) This resolution was duly adopted. lk GERARD P. GOEHRINGER, CHAIPAKN RECEIVED AND FILED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN CLERK DATE Town Clerk, To of Sout olii Received. f �r^' MAY.g`6 20 5 # /2onln.g Board of Appeals � 1 r } S t�•. 7 - 7''Oaif[ra1 i 1 I i ZI_ 'o �,7 rI�(e00 )-r rz j • � � Q Iyk �.f dx•oaenxHg,;os •"'FR e�,:i��,' G�„ . j ti�,.l ri r 14:for €€ YAppe� � :7 rsg! I OF N EFF rf� 1 re eeldk-f,voM7'�s 1 �D ' 4(��•az�icr''Lcrrc� Sur �' "� �m 9 Py r7 :s-s3 Id i i o.J iv ieGive MAY 16 2025 Zoning Bofird of Appeals i (wn Southold Town Board of Appeals �1� MAIN ROAD- STATE ROAD 25 SOUTHOLD. L.I.. N.�?seeived TELEPHONE(516)765.1809 ACTION OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 16 2025 Appeal No. 3583 Application Dated November 21 , 1986 /6oni 1y Bard of Appeals TO: Patricia C. Moore Es Edson and Bruer q as Attorney for F. & H. HRIBOK [APPellant(s)] Main Road Southold, NY 11971 At a Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals held on FebrLla_ 5, 1987, the above appeal was considered, and the action indicated below was taken on your [ ] Request for Variance Due to Lack of Access to Property New York Town Law, Section 280-a [ l Request for Special Exception under the Zoning Ordinance Article , Section [X1 Request for Variancesto the Zoning Ordinance Article III , Section 100-31 and Article XI, Section 100-119.2 [ l Request for Application of FREDERICK AND HELEN HRI80K for Variances~(1 ) III, Section 100-31 for—T ufficient southerly side yard and total side yards, and (2) XI, Section 100-119.2 for insufficient setback from existing bulkhead along Arshamomaque Pond, for this proposal to construct garage addition to existing dwelling, at 90 Carole Road, Southold, NY; County Tax Map Parcel No. 1000-52-2-4. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held and concluded on January 8 1987 in the Matter of the Application of FREDERICK AND HELEN HRI80, under Appeal No. 3583; and K WHEREAS, at said hearing all those who desired to be heard were heard and their testimony recorded; and WHEREAS, the board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and WHEREAS, the board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and WHEREAS, the board made the following findings of fact: I . By this application, appellants request Variances 'from the Zoning Cade: (a) Article III, Section 100-31 for insufficient sideyard setback from the southerly property line at-5.5 feet and 6.9 feet; (b) Article III, Section 100-31 for insufficient total sideyards at 11 .6 feet; (c) insufficient setback from the exist- ing bulkhead at 30.7 feet, as established, for the proposed construction of a one-story 10' by 24' garage addition. 2. The premises in question is a described parcel of land located along the east side of a private road referred to as "Carole Road," Hamlet of Southold (at Arshamomaque), Town of Southold, having a total lot area of . 125 of an acre and 50.00 ft. lot width, or frontage, along Carole Road and Arshamomaque Pond. 3. The subject premises is located in the "A" Residential and Agricultural Zoning District and is improved with {CONTINUED ON PAGE TWO} DATED: February 5, 1987. CHAIRMAN, SOUTHOLD TOWN ZONING BOARD Form ZB4 OF APPEALS (rev. 12/81) 1 films X^10LD Z�\'.'J��i'1 CMi1ni. Page 2 - Appeal No. 3583 Matter of FREDERICK & HELEN HRIBOK DATE-ay-HOUR 9"y2o,.Decision-Rendered February 5, 19$7 • frame, single-family dwelling of a size 28.3 wi a byo24.3� feetown of Sou# vl�� deep. The existing setbacks of the dwelling ar 6.2 feet from the northerly side fee the bulkhead, 15.5 and 16.9 feet from ethe southerly rty line, 7sidet from property line, and 44.9 feet from the front propertyReceived as shown on survey dated November 6 1986 line, all (� Surveyors and Engineers, P.C. ,Prepared by Peconic I MAY 16 2025 4. Article III, Section 100-31 , Bulk Schedule of the Zoning Code requires minimum sideyards at 15 and 10 feet, minimum totaZoning Board of Appeals sideyards at 25 feet. The amount of relief requested from the requirements as to sideyards is 10 feet (21 .6 ft. to 11 .6 ft. ) , and zero reduction in existing established setback from bulkhead at 30.7 feet. 5. It is the understanding of this board that the construc- tion of this 10' addition will not violate any other provisions of the zoning code, including the 20% lot coverage limitation, and will be used only for storage and garage purposes. In considering this appeal , the board also finds and deter- mines: (a) the relief requested is the minimal necessary under the circumstances; (b) the circumstances of this property are unique, particularly in view of its nonconforming lot area, width and depth; (c) the relief requested is substantial in relation to the requirements; (d) there will be no substantial change in the character of the area and the variance will not in turn be adverse to the safety, health, welfare, comfort, con- venience or order of the town; (e) there will be no increase in Population density resulting from the grant of this variance; (f) in consideration of the above factors, the interests of ,justice will be served by allowing the variance, as conditionally noted below. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Goehringer, seconded by Mr. Sawicki , it was RESOLVED, to GRANT the relief requested in the Matter of the Application of Appeal No. 3583 by FREDERICK AND HELEN HRIBOK to construct one-story 10' garage addition at the southerly side of existing dwelling, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1 . There be no further sideyard reductions to less than the requested at 5.5 and 6.9 at the south side, nor 6.2 and 4.7 at the north side, (west/east corners respectively). 2. South sideyard area must remain open and unobstructed at all times; 3. Compliance with the maximum-permitted 20% lot coverage limitation of the Zoning Code (except by subsequent application for consideration); 4. Placement of two garage doors, one at the water side and the other at the road side; 5. Balcony and construction of garage as shown on building- construction plan filed under this application; 6. This variance shall automatically become null and void in the event construction is not commenced within two years hereof, and after proper issuance of a building permit. Board:Vote of the Doyen, Douglass, andSawicki. This sresolutionnwas�dulyGrigadopted. lk� / �hrnarv•9Q l'OS27 N m C Z Y O J o m a '' Receive � _ � C'j aD >- x ,z x� o o: MAY 16 At > U - I� a Z 0 IL O N W cn Zoning Board of ppeals O W LU OC O Y 0 > OD � `p Wazo � Z IL IL 0 Q F.. O o O PIQ 0 GPM %� ° �f n ODo inn, h ling �0.f'}�u Gn6 F 0 a Y 0 Z 0 fJ B N yl M :i i�c } d o W 2 S U s W cr W Z =• F- 0 W ►�� L d ir W J i W 0 e u o g zeE' t 6 � Q •p - \ d OVA ¢,Y O d � '•p � � �d e,� i U o �OreC QQ� Q C>L] Z 52LL� ho ID a. W O J �a xO. 2 ZOO of Fe a a� J W v s �qQR v) 0 i .3 m a ` c Z j- z AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicant for any special use Permit,site plan approval, use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district A11 applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Su olk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the Gener�� ( Law. vl� 1. Name of Applicant: Tamar Mebonia MAY 16 2025 2. Address of Applicant: 53750 CR 48, Southold 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant): in Board of Appeals 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project: replaced preexisting deck 6. Location of Property: (Road and Tax map Number) 1000-52-2-17 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {x ) No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes { x ) No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s) of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff, it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937)or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back of this page if there are additional property owners) Signature o pplicant i Date Note: 1. The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2.Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3.Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. 61 Z20 Appendix B Short Environmental Assessment Form Instructions for Completing Part I -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become]part of the application for approveI or funding,are subject to public review,and may be s ect to further er fiat on. respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation �4 � n fully y Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe wil e needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Zoning Board of Appeals Name of Action or Project: deck replacement-variances Project Location(describe, and attach a location map): 53750 County Road 48, Southold Brief Description of Proposed Action: replaced existing 12.3 x 10.2 deck Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Tamar Mebonia Telephone:646-678-8298 E-Mail:tamuna2I@gmail.com Address: 53750 County Road 48,Southold City/PO: Southold State:NY Zip Code: 11971 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, administrative rule,or regulation? NO YES If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources t hat may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no, continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes, list agency(s)name and permit or approval: 3.a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 4,500 SF acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned 0 acres or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 4,500 acres r79 land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. rban 9 Rural(non-agriculture) 9 Industrial 9 Commercial 9 Residential(suburban)X orest 9 Agriculture 9 Aquatic 9 Other(specify):q ( p f1'): arkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? NO YES N/A �eC@IVed x b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? x 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? Zoning Board of gppeafs x If Yes,identify: 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES x 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES x b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? x c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? x 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: NO YES x 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: x 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: x 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? x 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? x b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑ Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑ Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑ Urban ® Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? x 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? x ®NO ❑ YES b.WilI storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ®NO ❑ YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? x If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? MAY 16 2025 x If Yes,describe: Zoning t3oafd ul 1"PPe"!['s 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing Dr NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? x If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: Date: 7 Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archae ological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,or Moderate small to large impact impact Tay may �JeC ? occur 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage s �Q� problems? m 1 l 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? q peals Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should, in sufficient detail,identify the impact, including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. 9 Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. 9 Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 Board of Zonin Al 11 l Ieats A lieati0 Received OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION MAY 16 2025 (Where the Applicant is not the owner) Zoning Board of Appeals siding at 53 750 I,rQ u�lGw l�l�.l�jb v� hereby authorize Patricia C. Moor to apply for Cariance()on myobeha f from�thre71s do Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. By signing this document,the Property Owner understands that pursuant to Chapter 280- 146(B)of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured, and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three (3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may, upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3) consecutive one(1)year terms.IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBIMY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE REQUIRED THE FRAME DESCRIBED HEREIN, Owner Name: Received MAY 16 2025 APPLICANT TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM Zoning Board of Appeals (FOR SUBMISSION BY OWNER and OWNERS AGENT) )`j The Town of Southolds Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest on the part of Town officers and employees. The purpose of this form is to provide information, which can alert the Town of possible conflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever action is nccessM to avoid same_ YOUR NAME: -�N 't.] 1 AND PATRICIA C.MOORE NATURE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply.) Tax Grievance Variance _X_ Special Exception If Other, name the activity: Change of Zone Approval of Plat Exemption from Plat or Official Map Other Trustees Do you personally, (or through your company, spouse, sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?Relationship includes by blood,marriage, or business interest. " business interest means a business, including a partnership, in which the Town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by) a corporation in which the Town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO_X Complete the balance of this form and date and sign below where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold: Title or position of that person: Describe that relationship between yourself(the applicant) and the Town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A through D(below)and/or describe the relationship in the space provided. The Town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply): A)the owner of greater than 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation); B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity (when the applicant is not a corporation); C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant. DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this day of 2025 r• n Signature: rr-- Print: M C vJ 0, y-- Patricia C.Moore Town of Southold Received LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMFNT FORM MAY 16 2025 a� A. INSTRUCTIONS Zoning Board of Appeals 1. All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, shall complete this CCAF for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law.This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list,policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its significant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area(which includes all of Southold Town). 3. If any question in Section C on this form is answered"yes",then the proposed action may affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus, the action should be analyzed in more detail and, if necessary, modified prior to making a determination that it is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the LWRP policy standards and conditions. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website(southoldtown.northfork.net),the Board of Trustees Office,the Planning Department,all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 1000-52-2-17_ The Application has been submitted to(check appropriate response): ZBA-EXEMPT Town Board ❑ Planning Dept. ❑ Building Dept. ❑ Board of Trustees ❑ 1. Category of Town of Southold agency action(check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital construction, planning activity, agency regulation,land transaction)❑ (b) Financial assistance(e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) ❑ (c) Permit, approval, license, certification:❑ Nature and extent of action: reconstruct preexisting deck Location of action: 53750 CR 48, Southold NY 11971 Received MAY 16 2025 Site acreage: 4,500 SF Zoning Board of Appeals Present land use: existing house Present zoning classification: r-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency,the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Tamar Mebonia (b) Mailing address: 53750 CR 48, Southold NY 11971 (c) Telephone number:Area Code( )646-678-8298 (d) Application number,if any: Will the action be directly undertaken,require funding,or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No ® If yes,which state or federal agency'? DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure,makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. ®Yes ❑No ❑Not Applicable existing deck constructed originally prior to zoning - Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throu Receiver. ghout the Town o f LWRP Section III—Policies pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria MAY 1 6 2025Southold. See Z Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Applicable Zoning Board of Appeals replacment of existing structure enhances value(taxes)and preserves character of homes built in preexisting community Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III—Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes ❑No ®Not Applicable safer structure Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III —Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes ❑No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III — Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑No ®Not Applicable Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town o 1 f Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Received ❑Yes ❑No ®Not Applicable MAY 16 2025 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ®Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 57 thAAW Wi)d evaluation criteria. MAY 16 2025 ❑Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Znning RC)ard_nt_Appeals Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III—Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. ❑Yes ❑ No ®Not Applicable Created on 5125105 11:20 AM ` f 'gi�NC r t'��r r��:f. • ' _ - 'l.\�3d'- [YYl✓�'T� ! � ti ,j,y. t� �,a? s Il +�'. '•L I'r f ' �.1�G L••^.1c�:.�pj' ti' r"'j�ri ! x • zip••i� .u' f '!• � �. . r��. . - ... � +4��'�tis��-G+.� 1 1 i �• A•2 � y fr k. ,,y� '. �,3} 1 vk cap It I VT � �, _--...�...�„ � @_ _ '�} �1 1��•'•,+al'�p� ,-�fib'E'��`� �� ow ��-'��+��;•f ors. i,. ' rr - on W it '.. �'>> _w ems.�= -:. _ - .:�;.;_. .. '' •�y'p`,u+a, y�•��ary^�'•1•<};.r wr7.r3t�' r• - . � - _ -. � a �:'., .,3. �` S.�f a7•��;• ... •r �,r�' .ter ITTIF *g• f• ,s: _ . . � rr; : 'tii;, .� a �w•`.� •� - '3 '"L•. e � � `ram •m '.a"r�.,r,�r ��'..!`•L.! ��: r a� � '�' r 'Jdw -" f-7 v + MLI AW Aff AW ► 4W Ill AM - -�' d�f► _ �r_.; a ■ t � ? - I A mw mvF ; Y ■ - dA ff ej ; S. 1 AMW Am AN Iflot - - - wv ". �.r3:i �:-ScSr•., __ �. .'p_ , •r�J'•r S=i�•.'a:a; '}: _ �L ;Y. '�i ;.a� te ..��,._.��' :;�'• �.,..:;?y s,;. '. �' �i �• - ��_ - _-i ��+ � z�:', �d•�' .�7�a��',7�. .tom"{'+,` - rL.ti F' - Y'` �"�.dry. y1i:...i.. '• _ - 7xr �`� r fir- - L r .� 'f � r`•X•. .�chi'` Lb' '`- i�w�•y4't;� .`��+' `� '�. t:YFl:y si�'Ai•' i �' '_..rr j• `• %�_:. OF — NOON mullk 11, '^' �.7. `� -ram--"?i,, - t f: -� --• - .� �y..r,• ,. � '-i - - yak,1• k�� 1�j u ;�L ��, �• "� `+�-,�tL." - - .�- �'�"�l� � —y �=asp ice:� } _ �' � :• v, _�.:,:.�:;�:�'; �,• :' � is ti:- .,�,_�.•yS •+s� '•rack ?�°"'•�,^• �' ..r,i� .�}y`�:.' .. - .- � `•�-- _ -Y _ `: RS �rj� 1.�� { y:�yl;�• •'fit �• .-��.� -r.• r Ap '��' r. ■AV % 45V. bti\_• +� A xt • - .. -" - :� � v-•.;�. —stir. 11 I� _ 2 tam.. a .��j.•A � f .�� h.'.�.g�T�i ..2 _ ';s `+�yc- ��• �+a 3'�"�a-.••'•�•: � � � � !. P` Y..y WSJ � L. sliC• I; �, ITS _ Jim NAM le L 14 WNIN All 'rp,■ r i 2� '¢� — � i•, � 1i �I tI�L y il�' f�r1 r �r I. r.�. �. �� ti.. � � {', ' ��• �� •Y;�. 1 ill :�'d�: � r�l _ - f�y .j •)�'t-sJ �rl I I ��.•• - .L, i�ly 71 r ! _T. Y S rr t "�tiwr I IZ n • �• ,. ,,- `5 ;`� 'ram � �� r • �-rr.4 .r mr :1.:,.�.w'��j., c rr. i. +�}w;, �I,.,;, ,` �'• •i, � ,�s':� ``.-_.� �� ! .�•.'r�Cy�lrY •--» ...-r.�'J-��i�.�'d-'• _ r�r?� �z '.1 ,�11r' � _ - -•_� �,� Ate. . .• a. - �• .�� f�.�. � i � I ,U�� F � j1 T1 r ' •l , A ril --�-=_ -ma`s-�k:��yl��'r- �%`•'�j �l•r�-r:: _ ^�c:�r-�-.,cf J".7l`'.#;:I•:i•l._�.'i f P, ' f��T a 54-:T�{.�. �.J.: �. •�1/ �i _ fA _tj '.... . op x i tl wp — LK ,a. F #. ��.r.. ^•'x�-_:.fry j 316�`.�.• .. -_, :'` � t;.,rf�'�ET^% it - ••=3�`.<. �:.•�. •.�� •� • -ti.le�.;,:k- •�;4�e kk �k� ,yam'-•=,7it `� ,�•:rS,•�•_c;•,}}. se:; a a�t � ..-':�� r iJ•:ri. . .,1)' use�..."'� �1.,�+ ,'?�"' _ .- .'� ; .• BUILDING PHOTOGRAPHS OMB No. 1660-0008 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE See Instructions for Item A6. Expiration Date: November 30,2022 IMPORTANT,, In these spaces,copy the corresponding information from Section A. FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Building Street Address(including Apt., Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number: 5-37 5_40 440 City State ZIP Code Company NAIC Number ,i�aUl �'� If using the Elevation Certificate to obtain NFIP flood insurance, affix at least 2 building photographs belgw acc rding to the instructions for Item A6. Identify all photographs with date taken; "Front View"and"Rear View';and, e View"and "Left Side View." When applicable, photographs must show the foundation with representative ex p e flood openings or vents,as indicated in Section A8. If submitting more photographs than will fit on this page, use the Continuation Page. Board of APPORIt' .y ,�x7�r�"'Y?,'�3,-r,5 "`:'�c��:_'�:{ _ "his • Clear PhatO One Photo One Caption - . _+_ Ciear Photo Two F'noto I wo l;apuon , FEMA Fonn 086-0-33 (12/19) Replaces all previous editions. Form Page 5 of 6 BUILDING PHOTOGRAPHS OMB No. 1660-0008 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE Continuation Page Expiration Date:November 30,2022 IMPORTANT: In these spaces,copy the corresponding information from Section A. FOR INSURANCE COMPANY USE Building Street Address(including Apt., Unit,Suite,and/or Bldg. No.)or P.O. Route and Box No. Policy Number: City State ZIP Code Company NAIC Number If submitting more photographs than will fit on the preceding page, affix the-additional photographs beI1D MIfttcgraphs with: date taken; "Front View" and "Rear View"; and, if required, "Right Side View" and "Left Sid pplicable, photographs must show the foundation with representative examples of the flood openings or vents,as indicated in Section A8. �2 Zoning Board of Appeals 1 I x..e -• - -- ��:w•r`...7,.._ _ ti _ .,fit .- w - - �{ Photo Three Caption Uear.Photo Three L e4 Photo tour Caption Clear'Phvto Fo:jr FEMA Form 086-0-33 (12/19) Replaces all previous editions. Form Page 6 of 6 o o 0 - =i -� -n > -n p 'a (S` O 0 a 3 a m 3 f, Z � Z a w N m O M 0 ` . �i c Ill C} z .s v rn �a a r �11 € A eal - o C < n m - O 0 G} D CD :Zt Zrri r Z v T -n CU p p rn < Z m m -� 0 T -n " v D CA �� D 0 O m Ln n m F o ov i --I C„ O [O! D R r m { ` O i I- MMMIMMIEIMMMMIMIMM EMOMMIMMISIMINSIMIN MEN IMMER No IMEEN ONE MEMMIMISMEMIN EMEMOMEMIN MEMOMMIME EMENSIMEMISISMIN ENOS mom MEMO MEE NEESON 0 mom on NONE no NEE MEMO Ml NONE