Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1000-102.-3-1
320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 December 27, 1990 ~ Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 ~ '!RE: Major subdivision of Nicholas Aliano at Peconic SCTM: 1000- Dear Sirs: Enclosed herewith please find our newly issued permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation for final approval on the well for fire protection at the above referenced subdivision. We are aware that this arrived past the time indicated by your Board, however, this was not under the control of the applicant. We have been in diligent pursuit of completion of this well. As you can see, we have finally succeeded. We would again request the Board's consideration of this delay as an extension so that we may finalize this application. We sincerely appreciate your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, }tER:ml Enc. CC: Nicholas Aliano 320 Love Lane Mattituck,~¥ 11952 Deoember lg, 1990 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Major subdivision of Nicholas Aliano at Peconic Dear Sirs: Please be advised that we are still awaiting the fire well' testing by the z. ~ Fire District with regard to the above referenced subdivision. Sincerely, H~nry IE. Radnor, Jr. HER:mi ~L~..wWork State Department of Environmental 'Conservation ~[;ion 1 Headquart~,rs SUNY, Building 40, Stony Brook, NY (516) 751-1389 Thomas C. Jorling Commissioner November 19, 1990 , Mr. Nicholas Aliano 11 Ashley Lane Shoreham, NY 11786 RE: 1-4728-00655/00001-0 Dear Per:iCtee: in conformance with the requirements of the Skate Uniform ?rocedurs~ Acc (Article 70, ECL) and itt imp!amen:lng Regulations (61~CRR Parc 621) we are enclosing your permit. Please rea~ ai% conditions carefully, if your are unable to comply with any conditions, pie~$e coatac[ the Kegioaal Regulatory Affairs Office, N-YS Department of Envlrcnment~l. Conservacion, S~ate University of New York at S[ony Brook, Building 40, Snony Brook, N.Y. ~1790-2356. Very truly yours: Rbger Evans Environmental Analyst RE:slc · .-4728-0.0655/0000~--0 .~ '- 11/1'9! 90 FACILITY/PRO~R~ NUMmi ~ P E R M IT [xe~ ~TiON '.. - Under Ihe iflvironmenl~ ~n~rvaiion ~w H~0~2 11/~819~ 1 A~icie iS, Title 3; 6NYCRR 327, ~ 6NYCRR 608: ~ ~cle. 25: I 328, 329:.~ualic P~dci~s I I Water ~a~y Ce~ification I I' Tj~I Wetlands --1 ~clo 15, ~tle 5: -- A.iclo 17, TJOes 7, 8: .~ A.~I~ 27, Tillo 7; 6HYCRR 360: ] ProtOn of Water SPDES I J Solid Waste Management' J. A~cle 15, TiLle 15: ~ ~icle 19: ~ ~cle ~7. T~le 9; 6NYCRR 373: wa~r ~p~y ~ ~r Pollution Control' ~ ~az~dous Waste ~nagement i ~c!e, 15, ~tle 15: ~ A~cle 23, Title 27: ~ Ardc~ 34: Wat~ TmnSPd I I ~d Land Reclam~ion ~as~F Erosion Management .[ ~e~ ~5~ '.Title 15: ~ Afl[cie. 24: ~ A~icteFl~p~if135:. Manageme, i N . Lo~.:~iand'Wei~ Treshw~er Wetlands . , ~1-~5. T~e 2~: N--New. R--Renewal. M--Modification. ~ ~jdla~ 1. 3. 17. 19. 2Z. 3~: WJ]~ $ce~a~d ~cr~lio~l C--Construct ('~ly). O--Operate ('only) , , 6NYC~ 3~: Radiation ~nlrol 11 As~]~ L~, Shb~eh~m, ~Y 1178~ I ~d~l~ Ra~d &LBlu~ Horizon Blu~ Rd.,'Saut~old Soul,old Su~ol k ' Sou~hold To construct ~ Hell, 10" ~n d~me~er ~pb~ox~m~tely go' deep ~nd ~o equip ~ ~h ~ pump h~vtng ~ c~p~cJ~ o~ 3~0 g~ilons pe~ minute. '~e~ pumped ~om th~s ~ell ~s ~a be used ~o~ ~re pPo~ec~on pu~pose~ only. ante wilh Ihe ECL, ali ippEcabie rquialions and ~e ~ndilions s~ii~d herein m allac~d heielo. / Page 1 of ~ ./ SPECIAL CONDITIONS For A~icle 15 ~ Title 15: Lons~ Island Wel~ s I ~ .i.' 1.Tb~ Depament reserves ~he right to ~s~ ~s pe~t or to ~ake whatever .~ ac~om ~ may de~ ~able ~d prop~ i~ ~e ~rk authorized ~o be cons~c~ed ~rein ~s no~ ini~ia~y N~-30,' ~. 2. ~o ove~flows or co~ec~lo~ ~ s~e.~s or cross-con~c~io~ to any o~ber source of.water supply ma2 be i~t~le~.or ~n~ai~d. 3. ~ entire pl~z and ~he apparatus co~ected ~her~th muse at '~1 reasonable ~ours be open ~o inspection and test b~ duly accredited aganEs of chis ~epar~en~ ~d of the loc~ ware: authori~. 4. .~s. decision aud approv~ sha~ not be held to Erst ~ptiou from Eeneral restrictio~ of the use of water lot t~s particular 9u~ose which ~ at an~ e~me be. ~mposed ~y other competent auto.ties. DEC PElU~IT NUMB~ 1-4728-00655700001-0 W-401~ Pa~e 2 of 2 . APPEALS BOARD MEMBERS ~ ~ . HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P. Goehr:mger, Chairman Charles Gfigonis, Jr. Town Hail, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. BOx I179 Joseph H. Sawicld Southold, New. ¥o~ 11971 James Dini~io; Jr. BOARD OF APPEALS F~x (516) 765-1823 Telephone c51~':765:1809 TOWN OF SOUTFIOLD Telephone (516) 7~67~800 Appeal No. 3907 - Application of NICHOLAS ALIA~O-.~~ Varxance to the Zonxng Ordxnance, Article III-A~Se~on 100-30 A.2 to construct a retail/office complex. Proposed construction is not permitted in this R-40 Zone District. Property Location: 29950 Main Road, 30 Pequash Avenue, CutchoqUe, NY; County Tax Map District 1000, Section 'i02, Block 3, Lot 1. WHEREAS, public hearings were held in the Matter of the - -. .... Application of NICHOLAS ALIANO under Appeal No. 3907; and wHEREAs, at said hearings ali those who desired to be heard were.heard and their testimony recorded; and WHE1ZEAS, the Board has carefully considered all testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application; and W~EREAS, Board Members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question, its present zoning, and the surrounding areas; and' WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings of fact: 1. This is an appeal of the January 5, i990 Notice of Disapproval in which an application dated January 4, 1990 was considered by the B~ilding Inspector to construct a retail office complex and which was disapproved on the following grounds: "...Under Article III A (R-40 District), i00-30A.2, proposed construction is not a permitted use in this district. Action required by the Town Board (Zoning Change} or by the Zoning Board of Appeals... " 2. The premises in question consists of .860 acres, or 37,462 sq. ft. i~ area with 200 ft. frontage along the west side of Pequash Avenue and 207.62 feet along the south side of State Route 25 (Main Road) in the Hamlet of Cutchogue, Town of Southold. Page 2 - Appeal No. 3907 Matter of NICHOLAS ALIANO Decision Rendered June 27, 1990 3. The subject premises as of January 9, 1989 has been situated in the R-40 Residential Zone District and is improved with an existing one-s~ory frame building having a total floor area, inclusive of attached garage, of 1408+- sq. ft. 4. B~this application, the appellant requests a Variance for' permission to construct new 1426 sq. ft. (One-ster~.) masonry ibu~lding to be. occupied by retail stores and commercial office uses, uses which are not permitted in tkis R~40 Zone District. 5. Certificates of Occupancy have been furnished for the record, i~d~c~ting, tha~ on Ja/%uary 14, 1988 renovations were made to an ~xisting real estate office in an existing building (C.O. 9Z-16582) and.that on August 2, i973, Certificate of Occupancy No. Z5343 was i~s~ed for a business building with apartment (public garage). 6. Although the present use of the site has been nonconforming in this R-40 Zone District since the January 9, 1989 Master Plan Zoning Revisions, the relief requested in this application.is not under the nonconforming sections of the code and was. applied for a variance under the "permitted use" section of this ~R-~0 Zone District. 7. For the record, it is noted that expansions, enlargements, alterations or reconstruction of nonconforming buildings and/or nonconforming uses are not permitted without variances from the Board of Appeals (Section 100-243 of the Zoning Code.). 8. It is the position of the Board Members that the grant of the subject variance under the present terminology and definitions of the current zoning code is not appropriate. 9. In considering this application, the Board also finds and determines: (a] sufficient proof has not been demonstrated as required by the statutes to show that: (1) the property cannot yield a reasonable return with underlying facts in dollars and cents proof; (2]. the burden of proof of unnecessary hardship or that literal application of the zoning ordinance would result in unnecessary hard~hip has not been sufficiently met (Otto v. Steinhilber); (3) the use to be authorized will not alter the essential character of the locality; Page 3 - Appeal No. 309 Matter of NICHOLAS ALIANO Decision Rendered June 27, 1990 (b) the uses proposed are not 'permitted uses in this zone district and will not be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance; (c} the current uses of the property and the zone · ~ district regulations are not so restricted that the premises · i~could not be used for reasonable purposes; (d) tile circUmstances and nature of the uses of the property are unique; (e) the property in question is centrally located in the R-40 Residential Zone District and is not immediately adjoined by any other zone district; (f) this Board cannot under the semblance of a variance exercise legislative powers. Accordingly, on motion by Mr. Dinizio, seconded by Mr. Grigonis, it was RESOLVED, that the relief requested under Appl. No. 3907 in the Matter of N'ICHOLAS ALIANO-be and hereby is DENIED for the reasbns noted above. Vote of the Board: Ayes: Messrs. Goehringer, Grigonis, Doyen, Sawicki, and Dinizio. This resolution was duly adopted. lk .... GERARD P. GOEHRINGER CHAIRMAN PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOFF L. HARRIS Bennett Oylowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Tele[~hone (516) 765-I938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 MEMORANDUM TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman, Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr. ~/~/ Chairman DATE: May 21, 1990 RE: Nicholas Aliano - Proposed Site Plan for Pequash Commons SCTM~ 1000-102-3-1 The following is in response to Messrs~ Aliano and Ralrnor letters of April 11, 1990 and April 6, 1990 commenting on the Planning Board's memorandum of March 15, 1990 regarding the proposed project known as Peguash Commons. Mr. Raynor states the reason he is before the Appeals Board is due to the lack of processing and delay on the part of the Planning Board. An inspection of the file reveals the last correspondence received from Mr. Raynor pertaining to Pequash Commons, was a revised site plan suhbmitted on April 15, 1988. The next communication from Mr. Raynor was a new application for site plan approval received on August 9, 1989, a period of applicant inactivity of sixteen months. The Planning Board terminated it's review on September 20, 1989 because offices and retail stores are not a permitted use in the R-40 Low Density Residential District. The environmental assessment form submitted with the application incorrectly shows the zoning classification of the site as B-l, the site is zoned R-40 Low Density Residential District. Page 2 Nicholas Aliano Mr. Raynor's statement that the q~estion o~ a more intensive use 0f the site should be mute before the Zoning Board is incorrect. S.E.Q.R.A. examines all aspects that affect the environment. A 364% increase in parking requirements in a residential district is h~rdly a mute ~ssue before the Zoning Board. The issue of junk cars on the site as an argument in favor of receiving Zoning Board approval is incorrect. T~ere are at present no junk cars on the site~ The traffic data s~pplie~ by Mr, Raynor is static and not specific to the site. The avsrage and seasonal traffic flow at. the site must be evaluated. The Planning Board ,is not in favor of a more intensive use of this site and refers the Zoning Board to its March 15, 1990 memorandum,(copy.enclosed) in which additional reasons are given in support of its position. Encl. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road u~ ~ ";~,~ ,~,~.. ~. SCOT'F L. HAR Sou~hold. New York ~:2,~~ ~401 '~ ,~ F~x (516) 765-~, 1197I ~ Telephone (516) 76. PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TO$~ OF SOU~OLD TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman DATE: March 15, 1990 RE: Nicholas Aliano SCTM~ 1000-102-3-1 The following is in response to your request of December 7, 1990 for comments on Application No. 3907: Nicholas Aliano. First, the Planning Board does not-have an application before it at the present time. The Board did have an application before it in 1989. The review of the application was terminated because the proposed use of offices and retail stores are not a permitted use in the R-40 Low Density Residential District~ which this property is now zoned. Second, the Board's position is that the placement of two commercial buildings in a residential zone, on a .860 acre lot, with twenty nine (29) additional parking spaces, is a more intensive use than the existing-nonconforming real estate office and metal fabrication shop which requires only eleven 11) parking spaces. Third, the applicant states that there is an existing auto body repair shop and wrecked cars on the premises. There are no wrecked cars or auto body repairs being conducted on this site nor have there been since April of 19B9 when the Board inspected the site. Fourth, the applicant states in his application that the project will not result in major traffic problems. This " statement is not supported by any data, such as a traffic study showing the impact of present use compared with that of the proposed use. Fifth, in the case of Otto v. Steinhilber, the Court o~ Appeals reversed a Zoning Board decision which granted a variance to conduct a commercial use in a residential district, the court said: Before the Board may exercise its discretion and grant a variance upon the ground of unnecessary hardship, the record must show that (1) the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that zone; [2) that the plight of t~e ~wDer is due to .- unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood which may re~lect th~ unreasonableness of the zoning ordinance itself; and (3) that the USe to be authorized by th~ variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Since, the applicant has not yet submitted any documentation to support his arqument, this Board finds itself unable to comment on the validity of his position. Accordingly, it recommends that the hearing be kept open so that evidence submitted at that time .can be examined and commented on. Sixth, the proper forum for this application is before the Town Board for a change of zone. · P. O. Drawer A . Jamespor t, NY 11947 April 13, 1990 ~.~- Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman ~'i Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Main Road ~ :~, Southold, NY 11971 ~:~'~ D~ar Mr. Goehringer: ..... . .... -P~%a~n'COm~ons. Also enclosed are site counts and flow numbers for ~raffic at this site based on the proposed construction. We would consider accomodating the Fleets Neck Property Owners Association by restricting this p~oject to office .space only, were we to obtain a vaciance f~om the town'm parking requirements and retain the same building plan as submitted. We would be'willing to amend tRis application ~eflect ~him reques~ should it appear to be a prudent course of action. Best regards, H~R:ml P. O. Dra~er A Jamespor:, NY 119 17 April 6, 1990 3e_'srd P. Goehringer, Chairman /:,acbsld town Zoning Board of Appeals ~.!ain Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Pequash Commons - Application No 3907 Dear Mr. Goehringer: In response to paragraph tw6 The Planning Board returned our application without request on applicant's part, contrary to information given to us by the then Town Attorney. In response to paragraph three The termination was determined by the Planning Board nine months after the change of zone went into effect and two years after the application was in process before this Board. In response to item two - The Planning Board never raised the question of intemsive use for the two years of processing. The site plan conforms to the zoning ordinance in the use district that it was in until January 10 1990 question of intensivity should be mute for the Zoning The Board of Appeals and should not be considered; rather it should be addressed in the site plan before the Planning Board. In response to item three - The Planning Board fails to note that auto body work and automotive repairs have taken place during this period. In April 1989, auto repairs and auto body work had been terminated in belief that site plan approval would be st%ortly forthcoming. The enclosed statement from a tenant reflects a limited amount of activity was still ongoing after April 1989, therefore, the conclusions drawn by the Planning Board are erroneous. In response to item four - Enclosed are traffic flow data sheets ~eflecting proposed utilization on the project. ~ The resulting traffic flow is miniscule in comparison with the existing flow on Ne~ York State Route 25. The design by Steven J. Hymen Associates is to mitigate flow problems. This has been redesigned to its present configuration at the request of the Planning Board office and Department of Transportation during 1987 and 1988. I have attached data fo~' 'yo~r Bo~rd's review. ' ' In response to item five - The case of Otto vs. Steinhilber is irrelevant to this variance hearing, in that the applicant's property ~¢as atreadv zoned ~usiness when the u~gr~ded site plas ~¢as commenced. In Austin vs. Older, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled the municipality has the right to oversee the expansion of nonconforming uses. The Planning Board's vague assertion of documentation to support years.. ~Je~. ~.~..~_ ~.~%~ ~.,~gu,men't ~e~-~ ~ ~_~ la ~r~l~u3~,~: as the-variance ~s-sol,~5' zn the jurisdiction of the ;onin9 Boar~ of Appeals. In response to item six - the opinion of proper forum being before the Town Board is totally without merit as action.on this proposal predates zoning change. We are dealing with a proposal to upgrade a .8~ piece of properly'from an auto'body metal fabrication sho~ and auto. repai~ ~%nk.?~d to a new office/retail complex brought to the standards of the To~ Zoning Ordinance site, plan elements. ?his property is beforej,'o~r~-Bo.a~,9 for a va~anc=. B~"a'Pd oPfzc~; -rhis' ~ro:ect beg~n in 1987 go a~y zoning ch.anges, i~ is the res%it Of ~6nfUsion and lack of response by t'he Planning Board office tha~ has placed us before your ~oard. Again, we th~nk you for your consideration in this ma~ter. Respect.fully, . -,/ / - HER:ml 11 ASHLEY LANE ~ ~ , / SHO. REHAM, N.Y. 11786 .~ (516) 744-1448 / April 11, 1990 Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Southold Town Zoning Board of Appeals P/ain Road .Southold, NLY. 11971 RE: Pequash Corm~ons, Application ~3907 Dear Mr. Goehringer, I have been the owner of this property since October 1, 1973. From the time I owned it until late 1988, this property wns used for Auto Body repairs as well as a Used Car lot and Parts Outlet. And from Late 1988 ~o now, a combination Metal Fabrication and Auto Body shop. in the word of Dr. Heneghan, Past President of Fleets Neck Owner Association - Directions to and from visitors ~as to turn right at the Junk Yard. Dr. Heneghan also will confirm that in the past year and a half at least 30 to 40 J~ked Cars were removed from the premises. I put wp a stockade fence, which incidentally there were no violations and was not mandatory but did so and the request of the Fleets Neck Assoc. and the building inspector. Since 1973 I had been constantly requested by area residents to try to keep the Junk Cars outside the fence more orderly, etc. In 1986 I faced an alternative of continuing with a gas station and Body Shop, Used Car lot ( which ~ras 'most lucrative) or to erect a new Office-Retail Building. I removed the gas tanks, documents available. PIy intent ~as to provide 2 of my older daughters with an abtractive Colonial Building, the same as I deeded to my youngest daughter, (which incidentally received an a~ard for most attractive Colonial~itd~ng in Riverhead, photos attached) to be used for~.~Fe-aT~E~e, ~Ya~el Agency3 I then proceeded to renovate the corner frame buildin§ for my daughter Patricia Krupski and her husband. To~ns people come in almost daily to compliment my daughter on how beautiful the place looks. - ~ Cormnons Appl~ 3907 I then met several times with Doctor Hene~han and other members and showed them the site plan and photos of the actual building to be erected and where my younger daughter and Job/1 Hancock .Ins. Co. occupied the same building on Route 25, Aquebogue. In my conversations with Dr. Heneghan I referred to the "office building, same am my ~ughter" I did not intend to mislead the association by saying,office building. Note: Fleets Neck Letter, RE: Site plan and building enhancement was their main cor~cern, L thought- it mede no d~fferen~e between office/retail gombinabion. I have spe~t over $25,000. on this proje~ and a good part of it ~as changes for Mrs. Scopaz. When she flat out refused my site plan showing 2-20' dufive%mys on 25A and would only give 1-20'. I asked for ~ appointment to see~her and had to %reit two weeks, and then she postponed it another week or so. ~len Mr. R~ynor and I finally got to see her, she stood by her 20' ~.. She'told ma about o~her site plans larger than mine she'd only give 20' to etc.etc. It w-as then that I advised her that this ~s another form of economic blackmail - and that she could tell the Fleets Neck people that she'd rather have a junk yard becauss I already had 200' of pr~-existin~ drive~a~ frontage on 25A plus 200' on Pequash. It was only then that s~e offered 1-40' driveway instead of the 2-20' on Rte. 25. tn anticipation of final approval I removed all of the junk and ~unked c~rs, - cleaned UD the place and insisted all car repairs be '.I,'.:,2!~T:: ~'-'.: L",.,-".. 0~.~". I feel that I entered into this project with clean hands and in good faith and that the Plannin~ Depts. delays and see-sawing between Architects, Engineers, Surveyors, Well-Driller, Site Plans and delays of every kind, and then to top it off with notification of a Change of zone. To me this is either Incompetence or a lack of Good Faith. Respectfully, Enclosure: Partial list documentation(more upon request) ...... consulting engineers .. ': Henry RaYnor 320 Love Lane . .~:.~ Mattituck, New York 11952 Re: Pequash Commons ... ~- Project ~ 8764 {~.~' Dear Hel~ry: Pursuant to our conversation and at your request, I have prepared ' the following information for your use. I¢ has been derived from data obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engil~eers (ITE). I've also included a chart with the appropriate figures highlighted. For the various possible land uses for this site, the average trips generated are as follows: 1. Convenience Market (2500 sf~_) = 1891 trips/day 2. Fast food restaurant = 2030 trips/day 3. Drip,e-in S & L bank 1008 trips/day 4. Retail/office as proposed = 301 trips/day I hope £hese numbers serve your purpose. If you require additional informa¢io~, please contact this office at your convenience. Thomas J. Filazzola, P.E. encl . : cc: N. Aliano 3505 Vetera~Ts Mernorial Hwy., Suite M I Ronkonkoma, N-Y. 117791(5 i6) 737-33781Fax: (516) 731-0753 .' March 25, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: I hereby state that on May 1, 1988 I rented the' Cement Block Building with Land surroundinG it for the purpose of Metal Fabrication of plumbing and heating ducts etc. with an option to sublet Auto Body. · I conducted my business of Metal Fabrication as my main busi- ness and did some auto body and motor repairs. I fabricated metal dash boards for race cars, such as shatter boxes for race cars for Tim Annabel, Stillwater Ave., Cutchogue. I reconstructed a jeep that was badly rusted as well as other automotive new quarter panels and rocker panels for different customers. I made protective metal plates for John Lake Land~ scaping, to probect his hydraulic truck lifts etc. Mr. Aliano fully explained to me that he was processing with tb~ Planning Board a new Colonial Building and that I was on a month to month basis since his plan was to demolish the existing Auto Body Building. Prior to my conducting any business, I spent several weeks or more disposinG of Auto parts inside the building, such as motors, rear ends, fenders and etc. Grease on walls, ceiling and floors required another two weeks or more. ~. Aliano disposed of dumpsters full of tires, auto parts and many junked cars which filled theentire fenced in area and many outside the fence. This w~s accomplished after I moved in. I .~wear to the above statement VINCENT I. K~U~K~ ~- 3940 Westphalia Road ~ttituck, N.Y. 11952 ~' .~'.'~' ~.. i.' ".'.'./.:~ .... ", '.' : .' : P. 0.' D~awer 'A ..~. ~ .... ' ~. '.'~ '" · ? . :. · · : , ' : '-,:.. ~ · ' .I%~'_~'.~.L~. ~ -. ~.'~ . ' · . · :' '.. .% -' :. . .. . , ... .'..'...... '. '.,., '. . ~, . .."'.. ,, '~'.. . . ' , -. _ .. . . ~,.. ' ~Bennett O~loweki~ Chalr.a~ ..'~"' ,'' :" ',]~'..' .' .' '~" Nain Road . .' ':'~ '"' :'~. `'~'' ' '.- · ' ' ' '"' ~ , SouLhol~', Ny 11971 . -' ." ' ' '...'".-.:,~[ ~"... - .. ' -. -' :.'. . ~ .. ,.' ... :... RE:', Pequaah Commons' at Cutuhogue" ' · ' ''-:- , 'gnCl0se~ herewith pleaae'find"ne~ess~cy application , · . "elements ~u=~uan: ~o Sec=ion ,100-250 for ~he above captione~ ' :"~' · · '"' i -'.; t, .: .', ,~ ".'~. : ;. - · .::,..~.,. hea~iAg-"on"your ..... ' ..... ~'~l~-'~.l ;'%.". · ': a,penda. / . . .,.. .. . . , ... ..;-:. ',.'- .. ...' ' ' ' ...' ': Since=ely, - -t~:'~'~, '.':. '~" , ' ~:-. .. .~...= .. .. :, .:'.~. .... ..... .~.::, .. .... ':. ' Henry E. Rayno=~ ... ~CS. " .. . .: ." ' ' ' CC: Aliano : ' . . :...{. Par: I of Long Environment.al Asnessmen~ ~orm gi~e Plan application --_~ :. ._.. · .~ .,- ..-. ,,. :.. ,~_-... ~,.., . ...... . ., ~. . ..; ..~. ,. ... ,;,. ~...,~';.J.~ ,.. ~ ' ~. ~ ,. .. ."::~ ; .:'. - · ,- ' .. ~.' ~ane~Dor~, N~ ~11~7 -.', ;',.' ..'.:. .... .~ : .v' ' . .: . '....M~n Ro~ ...... · .... ~ ...... ~-~ ~ . ~.'"'~ 7- .. .. . . .~ . . · . .. 2 .... ~j · ,' !~ '~,..'.'~'. Enclosed herewith, ace the, revised r-site pl'a per your ,: ....~- ..... "redommenda~ion' and ghat of the Planning Board~on,~he proper~ . ,: ....... of. Nicholas Aliano ag ~equa~k~Avonue,..Cugchogue,''~:Nmw'York. - h~ ... .~ .- ~ . Encs. ~', .' .-'..~ . '-...,""..',. , :. -' ~ ': · . : . .... GEOSCD?N ,. · : ,..(::.. Box lOOO e"'Souti~old,.Flew Yo~ 11871 * (516) 7~77 ~'.. ~'~ :.' . ' , -~?:., · : ', ' TEST HOLE DATA SHEET : ~ :'~Tax Map ~umb~r~. ' 10~i02-3-I ...... '" % ' ~ '~olo~ D~rlpflon:'.::. ~..an~ .~tldtn~a .'-.' ~;:.. :..:.. ' . · ~.. ~ ... ~ ..-..~.. ~at~: · ~ :~4/~80 . .:~ ~ :.' ~?..-~.~. ;:7;.::~: :. ' '. ~ · ~..: .,':..~ .. . .:'.. · ....~.~¥/~y... · .... .:. :.--~ . ~ , ." B~.I~ ~nd ''i'~i: · 2,~..~:~...;.,. ~ . .' ...~,. . -'. ~.~'~.'~ :' " .':' '."...'i~'... ¢.. :..>.',~,: -~: -. ~i~ br~ ~edt~ ~" mar,~ 8~n~ ~mm~nt~: : ~0'mt~r · ' ~..~." ~.~,: ~ts ts a cobb-of, your t~s~ hol~ da~a ~nd a btll, ' - ...~ ~. .:. :, .::?7:,_/ .. . ... .. ~'~:~ . ~ ..~8~-~I~ m[~n~.~i.,'.i.,,.,,tuu,uu ........... · : .. ... , · . ~hl,~ ~,~o~.~ :1:~'78~ ~ ,~ .::.' ~-'s:{.;'~, :~:'~ .. ~.~ '~ ".' ,, ',~.:". '.' .'~ ' :,":..' '. ?~' ' ~rtn~.l~a~. 00'.~frm'no~h· ltn~ ~nd 25~ ~c~ oa's~ l{no ' ~ ' . . .';: - ~.~'.~; '. . . .... , . · .:..~:? ~- .: .' . ., ,/;:":~:.~':~' ' " 0 ih. ,~.~ ~ ~ _ ,.~r P. O. Drawer A Jamespor t~ N~Z 11947 . ~ ~. ~ ~u~us~ ~, 1989 ~ ~ % :Sho~ett~m~. ~NY 11784 '~ R~ ~K:~[ces rendered at Pequaah Commons, Cutchogue, New York ~ ' April 2% hours ~..~ u~ 3 hours ~O'.~AL 75 hours x $55 per = $412.50 Town Hall, 53095 Main R~ad SCOWl; L, HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor $outhold..New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-18130 YLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMOtL~IDUM FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town' Planner ~ RE: Enclosed Memorandum DATE: March 2[5, 1990 With regard to the above-referenced memorandum, please indicate the tax map nunf0ers of the noted properties; particularly the Alia~o and Jordan properties. This office has at least three known applications on three separate propertie~ under Aliano's n~me. We have no applications under the n~me of Jordan's Partners. Without the tax map number, we are unable to respond to the ZoD~g Board's request. ._ Encl. Town Hall, 53095 Main R~ld SCOTt L. HARRIS P.O. Bo~ 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York Fax (516) 76571823 11971 Telephone (516) 7.65-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMOR.KN'DIJM TO: Doreen Ferwerda, Secretary FROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner ~ RE: Enclosed Memorand~ DATE: March 28, 1990 With regard to the above-referenced memorandum, please indicate the tax map numbers of the noted properties; particularly the Aliano and Jordan properties. This office has at leas~ three known applications on three separate propertie~ under Aliano's name. We have no applications under the name of Jordan's Partners. Without the tax map number, we are unable to respond to the Zon4ng Board's request. Encl. APPEALS BOARD M~MBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Charles Grigonis, Jr. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Serge Doyen, Jr. P.O. Box 1179 Joseph H Sa%vicki Southold, New York'11971 James Dinizip, Jr. BOARD OF'APPEALS Fa~ (516) 765-1823 Telephone (516) 765;I809 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Telephone (516) 765-1800 m~: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner FROM: Zoning Board of Appeals(~?~d DATE: March 25, 1990 RE: Traffic Reports In regarding Jordan's Partners, Breaker's Lands End and Aliano, we are requesting any information received by your office concerning traffic studies done on these parcels. We would also like any environmental aspects done on Aliano. Since we have as of recent date, received applications on Jordan's Partners and Aliano, we are requesting any communications affecting these three parcels on or before April 16, 1990. Thank you for your cooperation. ZBA/df Page 2 - Agenda Regular Meeting - March 15, 1990 Southold Town Board of Appeals I. PUBLIC HEARINGS, eontinued 7:50 p.m. Appl. No. 3903 - LINDA DAMBASSIS. Variance to Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-33, (Article XXIII, Section 100-239.4 (A), as disapproved for permission to construct accessories' garage, pool and additions to dwelling in frontyard area. Property Location 2430 Dignan's Road, Cutchogue, County Tax 5~p No. 1'000, Sectio~ 83, Block 2, Lot 7.2. 7:55 p.m. Appl. No. 3912 - EDWARD AND CORRINE BIt,DIE. Varianc~ to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III A, Section 100-30~13, for permission to construct additions to one family. dwelling, 'proposed construction will have insufficient side yard setbacks, Property 'Lo~atien: 380 Parsons Boulevard,.East Marion, ~County Tom(Map No. 1000, Section 037, Block 01, Lot 17.1. 8:00 p.m. Appt. No. 3911 - WALTER RAFFERTY. Variance to the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXI¥,'S~ction 241A, (Article XXVIII, Sgetion 100-281 (3), as disapproved, for permission to constr~ct additions and alterations to garage with apartment. Property.Location: East End Road, ~ishers Island, County Tax Map No. 1000, .Section 3, Block 7, Lot 5. 8:05 p.m. Appl. No. 3924 - MICHAEL HERBERT. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article IX, Section 100-91 (B), for change of use from Bed and Breakfast to a three family dwelling in this Hamlet Business (HB) District. Property Location: 795 Pike Street, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 140, Block 2, Lot 23. 8:10 p.m. Appl. No. 3918 - JOHN AND CATHERINE SIMICICH. Special Exception to the Zoning Ordinance, Article III, Section 100-31, for permission to have a winery for production and winery sales. Property Location: 4250 Bergen Avenue, Mattituck, County Tax Map No. 1000, Section 121, Block 1, Lots part of 001. ~ 8: li5~,.D ~ ~ ~.~ APPl. ~LNo. 3907 Z~.NICHOLAS ALIANO ~'" Varianc~ 't~ Zoning 0rdinan~e,~A~'~.~, s~tion 100-30A. 2 (Article'~XXV, Section ~00-253 A), a~'~p~ ~-'~r~ission" to a retailiof~ice~.~omplex, prop6~d-~66~'~ct~on is'~otl~~' ink-'this' Rt40~one_ District.. ~%~r~perty 30 Pequ~"~&h~td~0~'~'~'C0unty Tax'Map No. 1000,.Section 102,~Bloc ;O3,.Lot 01. Town Hail, 53095 Main Road r=~ ~'-~'. '~ r-m. SCOTt L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 %~~/~ Supervisor Soufiaold, New York ,~c~,._~..~,~.~.~ Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 ~ Telephone (516) 765-18( PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMOP~A~-DUM: TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROMr Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman DATE: March 15, 1990 RE: Nicholas Aliano - - SCTM~ 1000-102-3-1 The following is in response to your request of December 7, 1990 for comments on Application No. 3907: Nicholas Aliano. First, the Planning Board does not have an application before it at the present time. .The Board did have an application before it in 1989. The review of the application was terminated because the proposed use of offices and retail stores are not a permitted use in the R-401Low Density Residential District, which this property is now zoned.· Second, the Board's position is that the placement 'of two commercial buildings in a residential zone, on a .860 acre lot, with[twenty nine (29) additional parking spaces, is a more intensive use than the existing-nonconforming real estate office and metal fabrication shop which requires only eleven parking spaces. iThird, the applicant states that there is an existing auto body !repair shop and wrecked cars on the premises. There are no wrecked cars or auto body repairs being conducted on this site nor have there been since April of 1989 when the Board inspected the site. Fourth, the applicant states in his application that the project wilt not result in major traffic problems. This statement is not supported by any data, such as a traffic study showing the impact of present use compared with that of the proposed use. Fifth, in the case of Otto v. Steinhilber, the Court of APpeals reversed a Zoning Board decision which granted a variance to conduct a commercial use in a residential district, the court said: Before the Board may exercise its discretion and grant a variance upon the ground of unnecessary hardship, the record must show that (1) the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that zone; ~2) that the plight of tb.e ~wDer is due to ..' unique circUmstances and not to the gener~ conditions in the neighborhood which may reflect th~ unreasonableness of the zoning ordinance itsei~; and (3) that the use to be authorized by the~var~ance will not alter the eissen~al char, acte~ of the Since, the applicant has not yet submitted any documentation to SUpport his argument, this Board finds itself unable to comment on the ~alidity of his position. Accordingly, it recommends that the hearing be kept open so that evidence submitted at that time can be examined and commented on. Sixth, the proper forum for this application is before the Town Board for a Change of zone. March 12, 1990 Sbuthold Town Planning Board SQuthold, Ny 11971 G~entlemen: E~closed letter we sent to you in 1988 in regard to Mr. Aliano's pllan to erect an office building at Pequash Avenue in Ch.ltchogue. The Board of Directors of this association is of the same opinion a!s expressed in 1988. Yours very truly, Toni De Meo President F~EE ECK PROPERTY OW~~SOCIATION, INC. CUTCHOGUE , N.Y., 119~35 January 20, 1988 Southoi~ TO%~ Planning Board So,thole, R~/ Dear Members: It has come to our attention that Mr. Nick Aliano is planning to erect an attractive office building on Main Road (Route 25) at Pequash Avenue, Cutchog~e. Upon conferring with Mr. Aliano, the officers of the association wish to go on record that they are in complete accord with his plans. We concur with Mr. Aliano's plans for the placement of the driveways ~nd the addition of one driveway on Main Road (Route 25). We feel that these are not unreasonable requests and are in the best interests of Mr. Aliano and our neighborhood. The members and officers of our association have been concerned with the appearance and safety 'of this intersection for several years and feel that the proposed building will enhance the general appearance while affording a better view oflMain Road (Route 25) when entering from Pequash Avenue. Our con6ern is for the betterment of our co--unity. It is anticipated that you wil! take this into consideration during the decision making process regarding this property. Yours very truly, William F. Heneghan, M.D. President WFH/td Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SCOTt L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Southold, New York Fax (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM: TO: Gerard P. Goehrinqer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM: Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman DATE: March 19, 1990 RE: Nicholas Aliano SCTM9 1000-102-3-1 The attached map is in response to your telephone call of March 16, 1990 requesting parking data for the above project. The code provides for eleven (11) parking spaces for the existing site. The proposed new building and existing frame building l.i~f(~P~q~_.ash Commons) would require forty (40} parking spaces; a ~/~%~increase. 'It is important to note that the forty (40) space ~requirement is predicated on the rental of the space to a precise mix of 3~ offices and 5 retail operations. If the building mix were to shift to 5 offices and 3 retail operations, th amount of parking required would increase. The Planning Board's memo to the Zoning Board of March 15, 1990 contains additional concerns and data regarding this proposed use variance. Encl. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road SCOTt L. HARRIS P.O. Box 1179 Supervisor Soufl~old, New York F~.x (516) 765-1823 11971 Telephone (516) 765-1800 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN- OF SOUTHOLD MEMORANDUM: TO: Gerard P. Goehringer, Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals FROM~ Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman DATE: March 15, 1990 RE: Nicholas Aliano SCTM9 1000-102-3-1 The following is in response to your request of December 7, 1990 for comments on Application No. 3907: Nicholas Aliano. First, the Planning Board does not have an application before it at the present time. The Board did have an application before it in 1989. The review of the application was terminated because the proposed use of offices and retail stores are not a permitted use in the R-40 Low Density Residential District, which this property is now zoned. Second, the Board's position is that the placement of two commercial buildings in a residential zone, on a .860 acre lot, with twenty nine (29) additional parking spaces, is a more intensive use than the existing nonconforming real estate office and metal fabrication shop which requires only eleven (11) parking spaces. Third, the applicant states that there is an existing auto body repair shop and wrecked cars on the premises. There are no wrecked cars or auto body repairs being conducted on this site nor have there been since April of 1989 when the Board inspected the site. Fourth, the applicant states in his application that the project will not result in major traffic problems. This statement is not supported by any data, such as a traffic study showing the impact of present use compared with that of the proposed use. 0 Fifth, in the case of Otto v. S~einkilber, the Court of Appeals reversed a Zoning Board decision which granted a variance to conduct a commercial use. in a residential district, the court said: ~efore the Board may exercise its discretion and grant a variance upon the ground of unnecessary hardship, the record must show that (1) the land in question cannot yield a reasonable return if used only for a purpose allowed in that Zone; (2) that the plight of the o%~n. er is due to unique circumstances and not to the general conditions in the neighborhood which may reflect the unreasonableness of ~h~ zoning ordinance itself; and [3) that the use to be a~thDrized by the variance will not alte~ the essential Character of the locality. Since, the applicant has not yet submitted any documentation to support his argument, this Board finds itself unable 'to Comment on the validity of his position. Accordingly, it recommends that the hearing be kept open so that evidence s~bmit;~ed, at that time can be examined and commented on. Sixth, the proper forum for this application is before the Town Board for a change of zone. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 a~a~sr~^¢ o~ v~r.a sx~msxtcs OFFICE OF T~ TO~ C~RK TO~ OF SO.HOLD THIS IS TO CI~RTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE 'SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD AT A REGULAR MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 2q, 1989: RESOLVED that the Town Board of the Town of Southold hereby authorizes the refund of $299.55 to Aliano Shopping Center, which sum represents a site plan application fee to the Planning Board, which application was returned to the applicant whereas the property in question is not in the correct zo~i~9 district. Judit~ T. Terry (~ Southold Town Clerk October 27, 1989 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (5t6) 765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 31, 1989 Nicholas Aliano Main Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 RE: Pequash Commons SCTM-~1000-102-3-1 Dear Mr. Aliano:' Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $299.55, representing the application fee for the above mentioned site plan. Please note that the application and maps were returned under seperate cover on October 17, 1989. Very truly yours, _ .~,.; Bennett Orlowski, Jr. -> Chairman \ enc. cc: Judith Terry, Town Clerk Henry Raynor Jamespor t, NY llC~ October 13, 1989 Yalerie iScopaz, Town Planner Southold: Town Planning Board /;:~out h.o ld[, NY 11971 RE: Pequash Commons site plan Dear Ms., Scopazi: AS I have been waiting at least two weeks for a letter from your Board promised to me by Mr. Casper of your office and am not iln receipt of same as yet, please set up the earliest appointment to discuss alternatives with regard to the above captioned site plan. Needless to say, the applicant is extremely upset a~ we have processed this in excess of two years without any indilcation from the Planning Board pertaining to a zone change effective January 10, 1989. Sincerely, H~R:ml CC: Town Hall. 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 755-1935 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 17~ 1989 Henry Ra!rnor P. O. Drawer A Jamesport, N.Y. 11947 RE: Pequash Commons SCTM9 1000-102-3-1 Dear Mr. Raynor The PLanning Board has met on your request for a review of the proposed Pequash Commons project, and comments as follows: 1. As stated in the Board's letter of September 20, 1989, an office building in a Residential District is not a permitted use as per the Town Codel, Section 100-30A.2. Your proposal to remove the existing building and construct a new office building is not permitted by the following krticle. 2. Article XXIV,( Nonconforming Uses and Buildings ) Section 100-241- A. states," that such building or use shall not be enlarged, altered, reconstructed or restored or placed on a different portion of the lot or parcel of land occupied by such use on the effective date of this Chapter, nor shall any evidence of such use be increased by any means whatsoever." 3. Article XXIV, Section 100-241-C. states that such building shall not be changed to another nonconforming use without approval by the Board of Appeals and then only to a use which in the opinion of said Board, is of the same or of a more-restrictive nature. © © If you elect to apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance in accordance with Section 100-241-C., the Planning Board will recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals that the request be denied. The proposed retail and office building will increase lot coverage by more than i0%. It will also increase the parking requirements by 40 spaces. Aesthetics aside, the traffic situation at this inte~sectiQn is of utmost concern. The Board feels that the proposed retail-office use is not a more restrictive use than the existing real estate o~fice and metal fabrication shop. ~,.-~Very truly yours, / Bennett Orlowski Jr. ~ Chairman rgk cc: Board Of Appeals Town Board Town Hall. 53095 Main Road :. P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 ]7~LEPHONE (s~_6) ~6~.~ PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD October 12, 1989 Judith Terry Town Clerk Southold, NY 119'11 RE: Aliano at Pequash SCTM ~1000-102-3-1 Dear Mrs. Terry: The above mentioned site plan application and fee came in on August 9, 1989. However, the property in question is not in the correct zone and therefore the application was sent back to the applicant. Could the Town Board please consider a reimbursement of the application fee in the amount of two hundred and ninety nine dollars and fifty five cents (299.55)? Thank you. Ver- truly yours . BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR. CHAIRMAN jt P. O. Drawer A Jamespor t,, NY 11947 September 25, 1989 Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 RE: Proposed site plan fo~ Aliano Real Estate s/w/c Route 25 and Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue SCTM % 1000-102-3-1 Dear ~r. Orlowski: "In response to your letter of September 20, 1989, please be advised that up until the above date, September 20, 1989, my client, Nicholas Aliano, the engineering firm of Steven J. Hyman and Associates and myself have been diligently pursuing a final site plan. As prior to this considerable time and expense have been incurred by my client, and many, many meetings with your office which at no time was in any way questioning the process of this property under its existing use was arrived at. I find it quite questionalble by the Bo6rd to unilaterally terminate review on the above, captioned property. As ~here is no question in my mind with regard to a vested interest ipertaining to'the above site plan, I have further pursued this'withl the To%;n Attorney's office. There seems to be considerable doubt as to what methods should be continued at this point. At this time, I would request a meeting with the Board to discuss same. Sincerely, ~ H~ry B. Rayn~r, Jr. HER:ml cc: Nicholas Aliano James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Francis J. Murphy, Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer, Board of Appeals Town Hall, 53095 blain Road P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 TELEPHONE (516) 765-193S PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S~ptembe_~ 20, 1989 Henl-y E. Raynor, Jr. P. O. 'Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11971 RE: Proposed site plan for' Aliane Real Estate S/W/C S.R. 25 an~ Pequash Ave., Cutchogue SCTM~ 1000-102-3-1 Dear Mr. Raynor: The Planning Board has reviewed the site plan file for the above-referenced site plan and finds that offices and retail steres a~e not a permitted ~se i~ the R-40 Low-Density Residential District, which this property is now zoned. We are therefore terminating our review. If you have any additional q~estiens or require additional help please don't hesitate to contact our office. Bennett Orlewsk±, Chairman cc: Nicholas Aliano James A. Schondebare, Town Attorney Frances J. Murphy, Supervisor Gerard P. Goehringer~ Board of Appeals rgk Bennett Orlowski,. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Main Road · Sou~hold, NY 11971 RE: Pequash Commons at Cutchogue 1000-102-3-1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Enclosed herewith please find necessary application eiements pursuant to Section 100-250 for the above captioned matter. Please schedule this hearing on your earliest possible agenda. Sincerely, HR:mi Encs. CC: Aliano Enclosures: Application fee Part I of Long Environmental Assessment Form Site Plan application Twelve prints of site plan 617.21 !i ' -...' S=;- .. I., ,:~ ...q; ._ Appendix A ~-~! ;~'-~ ..... State Environmental Quality Revie'~' i ~ -.~; FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FO~M--' *: · . Purpose; The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a proje'~ or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not akvays easy to aeswer.,Frequec Iy; there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. [t is abo understood that those who determir significance may have little or no formal k~owtedge of the environment or may be technically exper[ in environment; analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affectir the question of si:gnificance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determinatic process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or actio: Full EAF Componeots: The full EAF is comprised of three pants: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic projec data. it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3:. Part 2: Focuses on identify'lng the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or actioh. It provide guidance a~.to whether an impact is likely to b.e considered sinai] to moderate or whether it is a potential]' la~rge impact_ The form aJs.o identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced· Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentiaJ]y-I~e, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not th impact is actually important_ DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE--Type I and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: [] Part 1 [] P~rt 2 ['-1Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF/Par[s ] and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other sueporting information', and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it [s reasonably determined by the lead agency that: [] ^. The project wiil not result in an,/ large and important impact[s] and, therefore, is one which will'not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. [] B. Although the proiect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' [] C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. ' A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid fdr Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(Jr different from responsible officer) PAR~ 1"--:PROJECT INFORMATION Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effe( on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers as part of the app[icataon for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition; information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. I'~ is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not invok riew studies, research or investigation_ If information requiring such additional work is ubavailable, so indicate and specif each instance. NAME~OF ACTION Psquash Commons site plan LOCATION O~= ACT[ON (Include Street Address, Municipality and Coun[y) Main Road and Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue NAM E O ~ AJ=PLICANTIS PONSO R I BUSINESS TELEPHONE Ni.gkp'ias A~iano contact Henry E. Raynor, Jr. (5.16 298-8420 c/o Henry E. Raynor, Jr., P. O. Drawer A · CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE Jamespor t NY 11947 NAME OF OWNER (If different) · BUSINESS( ) TELEPHONE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION site plan -J~o construct retail shops and offices Please Complete Each Question-Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: L-]Urban []Industrial ~]Commercial I-IResidential [suburban) E3Rural (noR-farm E]Forest E]Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: .86 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland {Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, eic.) acres " acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil typeCs) on project site? topsoil, sand and qravel " a' Soil drainage: EqWell drained 3 O0 % of site I~Moderately we'll drained __ % of site: [Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land ~s involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 'l through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System? O acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? C3Yes ~No a. What is depth.to bedrock? n/~ (in feet) FlI$% or greater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places~ r-lYes ~lNo 7_ Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? I~Yes ~-INo 8. What is the depth of the water table? + 1.5 (in feet) · 9. I~ site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? [~¥es [~No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? r~Yes 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? I-lyes i-~No According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique 9r unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes~ other geological formations) r-lyes r'~No Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood ~s an open space or recreation area~. aYes [~No If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be importar~t to the community? i'~Yes ~'No 15. Streams wi~in or contiguous to project area: non~ a_ Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a Name NONE b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by ex~sting p?blic utilities?. ~Yes I~No a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ~Yes I-1No b)' If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? I~Yes 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to A~riculture and Markets Law, AKcicle 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? i-lyes E~No 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 I~Yes ~No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? I~Yes E~No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Tob~l contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor .86 acres .... b. Project acreage to be developed: .86 acre5 initially; .86 acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 acres. d. Length of project, in mil~s: n/a (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; i~. Number of off-street parking spaces existing ; proposed Deft h_o~.rt g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 50 (upon completion of projectl;~ h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family /¥~u[tiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length_ j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is~ . ft. 3 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 0 t s[ 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? r"lYes l/No r-IN/A a. If yes, for what intend~£ purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? r-lYes F1No c_ Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? [DYes I-INo 4. How many acres of vegetation.(trees, ~hrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. - $_ Will any mature forest (over 100 years ~ld) or other locally-important vegetation be. removed by this project? [2Yes []No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 6 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of. commencement phase I 2 month 139 year, (including demolition). c_ Approximate ~:ompletion date of final phase 8 month 89 year_ - d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? FIye~ ~No 8_ Will blasting occur during construction? r-lYes ~No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 20 ; after project is complete 16 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any prelect5 or facilities~ I-lyes ~]No If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? [2Yes [~qo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount '; b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? [22t'es I~No Type seweraqe domest:ic 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ~]Yes I~No Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F1Yes I-gNp 16. Will the project generate solid waste? I-lyes lrlNo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? r-lYes I-INo c. If ,,,es, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? lDYes I-1No e, If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ~Yes l~No a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. -" b. I~ yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? r-lYes ~]No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ~Yes l/No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? r~yes ~3No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? I~lYes (2No ' Il yes , indicate type(s) electricity : per SCODBS specs 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 600 gallons/day. 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding~ [2Yes [~No If Yes, explain 4 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board ~]Yes City, Town, Village Planning Board ~]Yes [:]No site plaB City, Town Zoning Board [~lYes r-~No City, County Health Department ~]Ye5 I-INo Ocher Local Agencies [~Yes []No SCPC Other Regional Agencies il-lYes ~No ,State Agencies ~lYes (No DOT Federal Agencies I~Yes UNo C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed aetio~ involve a planning or zoning decision~ ~Yes I~No If Yes, indicate dec[sion required: i-lzoning amendment i-]zoning variance I~special use permit I-Isubdivision J~]site plan i-lnew/revision of master plan I~resource management plan F'lother 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? B-1 3 What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning~ 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? B-1 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. is. the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ~]Yes 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a ~/~ mile radius of proposed action? B-l, residential g. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrour~ding land uses within a ~/~' mile? J~Yes 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? []-]Yes [~No 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? []Yes I-1No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ~Yes [:]No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present evels? ~]Yes [~No · a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ~lYes E~No. D. Informational Details Attach am/ additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If (here are or may be an}' adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. · .... E Verification ' I certify that the informa~don provided above, is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name ~' (~'~[S ~d~IOIQO ~,, Date If Ihe action is in the ~astaJ Area, and you are a state agency, complete [he Coastal. Assessment Form before proceeding wilh this assessment. 5 Soul;hold, N.Y_ 11971 (516) 765-1928 APPLICATION FOR CONSIDEP~ATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application Filing-Fee Date Rec'd New Use Change of Use X Re-Use' Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval Other Specify Name of Business or Site Pe~uash Commons Location of Site Main Road and Pequash Avenue, Cu~c~ogue, New Address of Site, if available Main Road an~ Pequasn Avenue, cuuc~ogue ~ame of AppliCant Nicholas Ai~ano ddress of Applicant Ashley Lane, S~oreham, NY .[ Telephone ~erson to be responsible for Construction I Telephone .... ~pplicant's interest in site-check one: Owner of Land x Under contract ~o purchase Owner of-Fee Title to Land ~ddress Telephone ~ite Plans Prepared by LiCense No. ~ddress Telephone Total Land Area of Site .86 acre Sq. Ft. Zone Distric~ Existing Use of Site B-1 Proposed Use of Site Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 564 sqft. sqft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure'(s) 5982 sqft. %qft. Percen~ of Lot Coverage by Building(s) ~ % Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) per code % Percent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) % Datum(Specify)U.S.G.S. X Other Has applicant been granted a variance and/or special exception by Board of Appeals NO Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Dat~ Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? ,' If so, have proper permits been obtained? NUmber and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) ~'~¥ BE UNDERT~K~ ~ITIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. APPLICA/~T' S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK : COUNCIl/ OF SUFFOLK Nicholas Aliano being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at Ashley Lane, ~hore~am, ~New York - in the State of New York. 'and that he is the .owner of the above property, or that he is the owner o~ the Pequash Commons proper~y (Title) ( Specify whether Partnership which is her~y making application; that the or C0rPo~tion ) o~er or his heirs, successors or assigns will. at his own expense, install the re~red sits ~provements in accordance with Article XIZI of ~e Cod~ of the Town of Southold ~or the area s~ated ,herein and that there are no existing s~uc~ures or ~provamen~s on the which ~e~ ~ot shown on the Site Plan; that title .to'the: entire parcsl, inc!ud~g all nights-of-way~ have been c~e~ly est~lis~e'd and are shown on said Plan; that no part o~ ~he Plan' infr~ges ~o,~ any duly f~ed pl~ which' has not Peen ~doned both a~ ~o lots and as to roads; tha~ he has ex.ned all rules, and radiations adored by the Pla~ing Board for the fi~ing of Site Plus ahd wi.l% co~iF wi%h s~e; that the plans s~mitted, as a~roved, will mst D~ altered or changed in ariS' manner w~out the approval o~ the p!a~ing Bcard; and that ~he actual physical improvements will De i~lled in strict accordance with the plans Si~ned ~ o ~ NIC5OLAS AL IANO ( Owner ) Sworn to before me this Signed VINCDNT J. ~UPSK], 3~. (Partner or Corporate O~ficer and TZCie !~ LASER FICHE FORM ~Plann~ng Board S~te Plans and Amended Site Plans .... ~; ..... J'vpe: Rejected ':-',"~Tvpe: Site Plans ~t~,. Withdrawn ~,J~P..,2 2~, .~2[., _. r.l.,,r, c,,.._,.., ,.-.., ~,.~,. ...... ,..,,.., ...... ., ~, hK,rH ~[ ...................... , .~,] N ~'~mo: OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ~d the related information '~)%~[':,~)'i;: 1',',o',)l(.)p~.' '"", ',s ".o<,,...,.o<.'"" ' o:, c,,c.: s<'~th~est corner of Main Road and ~-,~- , -,, ... ' ' ': ~d H ' "" .....' '" lAC, (,(~1~ ,CI ,,. P. O- Drawer A Jamesport, NY 11947 April 7, 1988 MS. vaie~ie Scopaz SouthoLd Town Planning Board Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Ms. Scopaz: E~ctosed herewith are the revised site plans per your recommendation and that of the Planning Board on the property of Nicholas Aliano at Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. As this should complete the site plan elements I would request a presubmission conference before the Board'at its ea£1iest convenience. Sincerely, HER:mi P. O. Drawer A Jamesport; NY 11947 April 15, 1988 Southold Town Planning Board Main Road ~Southold, ~ 11971 Dear Sirs: Please find enclosed six prints of the revised site plan for ~he Aliano property at Pequa~h Avenue, Cutchogue, New York. HR:m! Enc. I ~ NING BOARO ~.~ PROM: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner 0 0 FL CK PROPERTY OWN~SOCIATION, INC. P. 54 CUTCHOGUE , N.Y., 119:~'5 Januar7 20, 1988 Sout~01d Town Planning Board Southold, NY Dear Members: It has come to our attention that Mr. Nick Aliano is planning to erect an attractive office building on Main Road (Route 25) at Pequash Avenue, Cutchogue. Upon conferring with Mr. Aliano, the officers of the association wish to go on record that they are in complete accord with his plans. We concur with Mr. Aliano's plans for the placement of the driveways and the addition of one driveway on Main Road (Route 25). We feel that these are not unreasonable requests and are in the beet interests of Mr. Aliano and our neighborhood. The members and officers of our association have been concerned with the appearance and safety of this intersection for several years and feel that the proposed building will enhance the general appearance while affording a better view of Main Road (Route 25) when entering from Pequash Avenue. Our concern is for the betterment of our comunity. It is anticipated that you will take this into consideration during the decision makinG process regarding this property. Yours very truly, - William F. Heneghan, M.D. President WFH/td ?~ ~.,~?=~. · ~. DI¥1RO;~tE~TAL A$S.r$$~ENT PART ! si~ plan oi ~lia~ ~-~ua~ .... Nichoi~s Aliano ' -: Ash'ley La~' '. ' Shoreha~,.- NY -.-1178G H~n~~ E. Raynor, Jr., Agen~ . ' ~-~ ~5~) J~mCSp,ort,... 'NY 11947 ~.~ ':: ~ .'" .~ . ~- :.~hops ~n'd off.~c~'-' ~: .... ~ ~' : .' · -': ':~--~ ' ' {PLEASE COHPL~E EACH QUESTIO)I - Indicate N.A. if not aDplicable} 2[, :5 or r.C.L.} _~acres acres --- Other (indicate tyne) acres fo~ations - Yes X ~. (Describe ) "Lakes, Fonds, ~)~d' a~s wi~in oT c~tiguous ~o project mre4:[ . ~a~ ~ ~e ~mln~n~ tan~ u~e ~d zone.n9 class~f ~t~on w~th~n a' I/4 mile radius of ~e ~roject ~e.g. a. To,al cofl~iguau~ acreage own~ by p~ject sponsor ~ acres. c. P~ject ~creage ~ remain ~developed., , 0 - _ ..... : .............. ~. L~ngth of p'roject, in miles:. N?A [if appropriate) [. )muter of off-str~t oarking spaces existi~ ; pra=osed ~ O~n~C~ g. Haximum vehicular tri~s generated per hour 50 (upon c~pletion of ~roject) One Family ~ T~ Family Ru)tiple Family Condominium Co.ertl al neighborkood 16 ~. How ~uch natural matertal [i.e. rock. earth, etc,) will be res~ved fn~ tho site - 0 ' tons E. Zf single Dbase I~roject: . )~lticiDated perio~ Of Construction 16 months. (including demolition)_ ' b. Anttcfoated date of co~encement phase '. ]- month 88 year (inc]uein -. . demolition) - ~- .... 9.N~ber of jobs gener3ted: du~ing canstr~c~ofl 20~', after project is N~e~ oF jobs etJ~n~tecl by this pro~t ~ · 11. V111 project requiro relocation of any pro, acts or facilities? Yes ~No. I( ~es, exolain: ;:. 1Z. !. ~s surface, or subsurface ~fquid ,asia disposaT ~Ovolv~d? ~ Yes b. X.~ ~es, tndfcate~type of w~ste'(sewage, tndustri~T, etc.) sew~raq~e (dDm~.St'i~) · . · c. ']f'surface Jisposal' name of stream ~n:t~ which eff'luont will b~ dtschargec~ · 15. a. goes pr~cC involve disoosa] of soZid waste? Yes k No electricity 26. J~r~vals: a. is any Federal pemft required? ~ Yes ~.~"- C. Loca~ and Regional ~D~rov~ls: -~, ~ ' '~ . · ...~.~ . · :: (Yes, NO) ~?-,~:~ .., : ~ ~ . - '. ~'-.: City, T~fl, Village Bo~ ~ ~.~ ~ no City, Ta~n, Zonin~ Board ~ ~o C. ~H~"AT[O~L DETAILS .' -~" "~-"~'~- . T/TL~: ;_ .... Agent fo,r Aliano Pctphe"r 37~ ]9B7 DATE: . . ~ . : ":::, ~ ". ....... : ~ .~. ..... ~ ........ .. _ ~- -. ~ ' £NVIRONPIE~TAL ASS-'~S.~ENT.. P.:RT I! ...... i: "~' ,;7 PreSent Impacts and Their Haqnitude ,' ..... ,~'~ (;eneral [nf,-.~atio~ (~e!d. Carefully] : · 7. ,.-.:. In completing L"-~ for~ the reviewer Should be guided by the question: Have ~ decisions and deteminat ~been re~sc~:~; The revf~er is ~t expected to be an exeert environmental analyst. - . %den:flying that ~ effect ~Jll be pet~t~aTly ~arge (colu~ 2) does not ~ean that ~t fs also necessa~ S~en~ffCant. A~y T~rg~ effe:t must be evaluated ~n PART 3 to de:e~ne significance. Ry identifying effect ~n coTum 2 si~piy asks ~at it be looked at further. ~e Exameles p~vfded a~ to assist the revf~er by showing types of effects and ~herever ~ssf~Te of ~gn~tuae that would trigger a r~nse in co1~ 2. The examples a~ genera]~y a~olicable :hroughot ~y be ~re aapreariate for a Pot~tial Large l~ac: rating. Each pmje~t, on each site, In'ea~ lo~iity, ~i1] va~. Therefore, the exanples have been offered as g ~he namer of e~es per q~t~on ~o~ ne: ~nd~ca:~ :he importance of each question. ~NS~T]0~ (Rea~ Ca~fully~ a~ ~ns~er each'of ~e 18*qu~tfoas t~ P~ 2. ~sNer Yes ff there ,i1~ ~e an~ effect. b. ~y~* ans~rs shoeld be ~ns.i~red as Ye~ a~s~ers. ' ·c. If ~e~erf,n~-~es tda ~es:iO~ ~ ~b~ ~b~'~pD~pr~ate box {co1~ 1 or 2} to indicate the ~-~ ~s~ze'q( :h~ ~p~r~ ~f t~ac: ~res~l~ .egua]~ o~ ~ceeds any ex~p~e p~vided, ~ec~ ~ 2. '~ '; ~t ~i1! ~cur but t~reshold 'is low~ t~an e~te, check colb~ 1. ....'.~ ~. ;~f' ~er~e~t ~as ~ubt ~out the s~ze of the i~c: ~Rn c~s.fder :ne i~acc as ~t~ally 1a~e ~procee~ to ~T,3. · ;~ ~ ... ~' :- . ."~'~ L~e. [~ a ootan:~a.lly 1a~e Cmo~ct Or effect can be reduced by a ch~ge in the project to ~ less ~an ~.: ~:u~e,. p~a~e a ~'es in co~n 3. A:~o r~oonse infantes, that such a reduc:io~ ~s not oosstble. 1. Z. ~. NODE~TE L~ ~ RED~CED BY · - [~?RCT ~PPACT I PROdECT ~ILL T~E~ ~E A~ ~FFE~ AS A ~SULT OF A PHYSI~L CHA~GE TO O0 PROJE~ SITE? Exa~oles tha~ ~oulU .Apoly to Col~ ~ ' '~ Any co~st~,:tio~ on slopes of )5~ or greater, (i5 foot rise oer ;.' ,, - . . -~. -;. m;. --~ YES '- '.. ~ - F~O ON T~[ SITE? (i.e. cllff~, d~es, ~lo~icsl ~t~s. ccc.) : 4. I~[LL 2~0:~CT AFFECT ANY t:0~-'PROT£C'TEo £X'IST~G O~ ~0 f~S t L..~* ..... ~3. !'ILL TuE~£ E£ A'I EFFECT TO.EX~ST~FJC T~NSPORTATZBN NO YES SYST?S? ............................................... O0 .... "'- ' I .... ~ ....... ,;,-~ .. ~DE~T[ ~SE ~aSCED la. ~LL PROOECT AFFECT ~E ~HITIES S~RCES Of ~EL qR NO YES E*a~les that ~ould ~p~l~ to ~olu~ 2 ~Pro~ec: causing nreater then 5~ ~ncrease tn a~y rom of e,er~ used ~n municipality. P~ect re~u~r~ng the cre3t~on or exte~s~ofl of an efl*~y 15. WILL T~ERE BE O~JECTIn~ABLE O~RS, ~IS.E, G~REj ~)8~TIQ.N NO YES ~ .:.. or ELE~.~L ~IS~,~NCE AS A ~T ~F THiS PR~JE~ .... ~ '. Exa~otes ~C ~uld Aooly to Colu~ 2 : ' Blasting ~iChin 1.5~ feet Of a hospital; school or o~er .' Odars will ~r ~bt~nelv (rare than o~e he~ pek day).' :*''~ '1 ~ :',P~jecC wftt o~d~ce ~oerating noise exceedin~ ~e -' ' ~. : , '~" P~ject Wi~ ~e~d~'~atu~t barrier~ tha't would a~t as a ' ~ .... "q' norse screen. ; ' )1~ YFS -~:. ' . ~t' ': ' 17. ~ILL 'PR~¢ AFFECT THE C~PACTE~ ~ T~ EXISTING PraJect ~ill relac~ 15 a~ m~ ~IoTees ~n one ~ .............. ". .' ' -'~ ~'."':: :'.'":': i - ';"~":'~ I · ~ , .· -? ~ ~ ~ % :~ ~ :,....~ .... ~. ......~' [rzYz~r~ENT~'A~SS.g~. .... - PART ~1 .' g~IFOR~T~ . * ..... ~ ~ .... ,..,:,;, .... . . · Part 3 ~s prepared ~f one or ~re i~act or effect ~S c~s~deeed to be potent~a11~ tar~e. · ~e ~unt of wri~inp necessary ~ answer Pa~ 3 ~y be deter(ned by answering t~ ~estion: ' X~ br;e~z ~)eCf~ t~ fnsc~cCi~s be)~ ~ve I placed ~n Chis record sufficient reasonableness of qv decisions? I~5TRUCT~Q)~S . ~l~te the f0]lowinq for each f~ct or effKt J~nttf(ed in C~)~ ~ of Pant Briefly describe the impact. ' ~ ~Krfbe (if apa)fcable) ho~ ~e f~a~ ~ghe be mitigated Oe reduc~ ~ a ~s ~ )a~e i~acC by a pro- ~ecc change. Based ~ the inf~:ioR availa~te, dec(de if tt ts ~asonahle ~ c~)~e that this i~act is traDe,ant CO tQe mfni,ctDaiiW (ci:y, to~ or ~))~e} (~ ~bich t~ p~jKC is lo,ted. ::~To answer t~ qu~tion of i~o~ance, ~side~: - The pmbability of the impact or eff~: occ~ng - T~ duration of ~e impact or effect :~:~, .%)~s.i~wrsibility, iacluding pemaaently lost t~urces ar '. ~he~r.L~ ~e i~act or eff~t can be c~trotled ..... ~ .... :L .... Y~e regiona) cqnJequence of t~e impact or effect ~ ~ ~ .. *. .~. OET[~I~TJON OF S~G:I~F~CA~CE An accfan fs consfdere~ .~O be sfgnff~can~ '~ne (or ~) imoacc fs deCo,tried to both lathe and its (their} conseauence, based on the rev~ev PAPT ~[! STATEmEnTS (Con[i~ue On Attachments, as needed) -.' 0 0 ~P D Senth01d. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1988 ]"' '- October 29, 198.7 .Henry E. Raynor, Jr. :?'~P.O. Drawer A .!Jam. esport, NY 11947 ~ Re: Proposed site plan for Aliano Real Estate S/w/c/'S.R. 25 and Pequash Ave. , Cutchogue Dear Mr. Raynor: This is to acknowledge receipt-of your site plan application. Before the Planning Board can proceed with its review, the following information is needed: 1. Parking calculations for existing real estate office. 2. Proposed location of parking for existing office. 3. Proposed location of loading area and dumpster. 4. Percentage of landscaping (25% minimum required). 5. Indicate what Phase II will consist of. Upon submission of six revised plans showing the above- noted information the Planning Board will continue its review. If there are further questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Valerie ~S~CO~Z Town Planner co v E 8T 'y M TT/TUCK Ro ZO / W 7 W� f, MA /N ROADSITE LO ON �o�o e� N.YS RT � w �'F FY \ PECON/C N 270- '-00'E. N 28'-12'-30"E /80.62' 275 p O REMOVE y C EAST r CUTCHGGU 40' Lc.9s PIMP I W rl _ �� NEty SUFFOLK CUTCNOGUE fJA/zBo/Z / HOG "6-CK 34Y hG w/ Q 3 ENCLOSED DUMPSTER TYP L LOCATION MAP NO SCALE /0' H H �0 � NANO/CAP •.: PARK/.vG GENERAL NOTES P 'ev *'F.ys/q,o,SG .F+yC`e ��'G'6a g�9s $'JG .• ) /. THE USAGE FOR BLDG, I SHALL BE SHOPS/ OFFICE SPACE. '— RQE17j 2. THE USAGE OF BLDG. II IS REAL ESTATE OFFICE SPACE. 3. A MINIMUM OF 258 OF LOT AREA SHALL HE LANDSCAPED. Wio tV' 4. ALL SURVEY DATA WAS PROVIDED BY RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. •A .x,/ry2�ASP O 5 ON-SITE RUNOFF SHALL BE SELF-CONTAINED IN DRYWELLS CAPABLE OF I( p STORING TWO ( 2" ) INCHES OF STORMWATER. O 3D' 0 6. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS r ti� DUMPSTE,¢ _J lV P OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. a� N JQ N Q S 35'-/4'-50,,W 5' PCAN>EO /7 SCR=EN BUFF�S-R 202.67' dARTEAU PLAN SCALE: 1 " : 20' PARKING CALCULATIONS BLDG. I : TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 43 ' x 126 ' = 5418 sf NET FLOOR SPACE = 5418 sf x 70 8 = 3793 sf REQUIRED PARKING = 3793 sf / 100 sf/stall = 36 stalls PROVIDED PARKING = = 38 stalls BLDG, II• TOTAL BUILDING AREA = 14 ' x 33 ' + 6 ' x 17 ' = 564 sf NET FLOOR SPACE = 564 sf x 75 8 = 423 sf n D REQUIRED PARKING 923 sf / 100 sf/stall = 5 stalls Illuln-lu{'I D PROVIDED PARKING = = 6 stalls APR I 9n TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING = 44 STALLS PUNNING BOARD u DATE REVISION 11 -2 -87 PHASE II PARKING DUMPS TER ALIANO REAL ESTATE LOCATION, LANDSCAPING REO'T. ��pqS OF NEW yoP CUTCHOGUE , SUFFOLK COUNTY , NEW YORK USAGEOSEP ¢ 12-21-87 COMBINED PHASE I B PHASE Sr ��� h y/ (f Q Steven J H"man Assoeiates (516) 737-3378 4 - 4 -88 PARK/NG LAYOUT , I " `nnconsulting engineers 4-12-88 SHOPS -Z(. Y 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M/Ronkonkoma, N.Y. 11779 o�'kq. 05955NSCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE: SHEET 20' 87-64 OCT. 1987 ��PE6610NP�' / OF / 'ALTEFATIONOFTHISNGCOMEMExGEPTBYA PEOUASH AVENUE SKETCH PLAN LICENSED PHGFMIONAL ENGINEER ISILIPGAL" Cp t N G` V ® MC TVTUGK To 'o 0 T 4010 MAIN ROAD (N. Y.S RTE. 25) � CU C OG v 0 !PR — RAMP WALK TO MEET PFII/EMENT'FLUSH N-Ys. A77 57 `o. ON /1 L.. %LLIL59 W L/G \ 0 ` y� 'FOAd `! (l4 I_I N29.4 '00"E N2B% LBO2'30"E /BO. 2' 0/ 7"CM CUTCNOGU I �b. + �/ vew suFFocx R=25' S, cO O \�� rWh R_•./\� 5 ��p / �, 4 0 I HOG NECK @AY tl \ REA/OVE EX/STFNG 0 V L OCA RON MAP STRUCTURE 0'' - �° u ti N T.S. N/F PHILIP 8 PAIR/CA PHILLIPS MARCO „l0 / 1 \, I`\ =4' ((� H A HANOICAP' +�a, rN/ GENERAL NOTES /01 ° cx H3� \�. RAMP O-M) ° ° 1 . THE APPLICANT FOR T}IIS PROJECT IS ALIANO REAL ESTATE - 3800 + `/ DUCK POND ROAD, CUTCHOGUE , NEW YORK 11935 .S70CKADEFENEAfEl CE l 2 . THE SUFFOLK COUNTY TAX MAP NO. IS 1000-102-3-1 . MgSONRyD \M l 3 , THIS PARCEL CONSISTS OF 0 . 860 ACRES . _ L ` UN/T/ /STORY „ / B3i UN— UNITS BU/LD/NG �\ / 4 • ALL SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY BIENSTOCK, LUCCHESI"° B"ASSOC. - P .C. eos,B SF I UN/T4 x 7/3sf; 7pg I/�5 UN 4' 'S AMITYVILLE , NEW YORK. 55;F. 7j35F. � UN/T 7 j r BDRBSF "• 5 . ALL SURVEY DATA IS IN THE U . S .C. 8 G. S . DATUM. y. B3A3 SIF, �� _ L - 6 . ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND ^^�•''' _ - •� SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. 33 ry `___ 7 . THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL EXISTING O P UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO ALL CONSTRUCTION . R=P ry 5 3 R=3' vL (� lr Q P p 35' PARKING CALCULATIONS ., R= !� I / IO 7-)Ip. GROSS RETAIL FLOOR SPACE (UNITS 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , d 7 ) 3992 SF ry STALLS REQUIRED ( 3992 SF / 200 SF/STALL) 20 STALLS GROSS OFFICE FLOOR SPACE (EXISTING BLDG. ) 564 SF GROSS OFFICE FLOOR SPACE (UNITS 3 b 5) . 1426 SF "35'%430"{y © � TOTAL� 990 SF STTALLSOFFICE REQUIREDOOR990ACE SF /664 fi005SF/STAL6) S. . • , . . 1920 STALLS _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED ( 20 + 20) 40 STALLS I 64' j TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED 40 STALLS HANDICAP STALLS PROVIDED . . k . . 2 STALLS N/F JOHN ^J� ELL/OTLAWSON V PLAN A = 20• L;I �IuN AUG — 9 1989 r , soLr ni'h I I DATE RIEVISION PEOVA SH COMMONS PSE OF NEW YO CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, os EpHy Stowif J.HymeH Assudates consulting engineers z 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M l l SCALE: PROD. NO.: DATE q 0596 AS SHOWN 8764 R0 sslwApl' °ALTERATION OF THIS DCCUMEAR EXCEPTOYDIMENS/ONAL SITE PLAN LICENSER PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,ISILLEGAL" NASSAU SUFFOLK BLUEPRINTING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ASSUME: STORE 2^ OF RUNOFF IN 10' DIA. DRYWELLS FOR ROOF AND PAVEMENT , C - 1 . 00 \ FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS , C - 0. 17 \ SYSTEM 1 : ROOF / PAVEMENT 3980 SF x 1 . 00 x 2/12 ' - 663 . 33 CF LANDSCAPED AREA 980 SF x 0 . 17 x 2/12 ' - 27 . 77 CF STORAGE REQUIRED - 691 . 10 CF Jaw 303, ]a.V 30.56 pg„g� USE 1 DRYWELL 11 ' DEEP ( STORAGE CAPACITY - 752 CF) 3A_ SYSTEM 2 : �3O '3I°1 MAIN ^J160 ROAD .3431 (N(N Y,6. RTE. ?5) '3a76 •3a5Y ROOF / PAVEMENT 9090 SF x 1 . 00 x 2/12 ' - 1515 . 00 CF (ASPHALTPAVEMENT /CONCRETE BASEL -- -- ,30.41 LANDSCAPED AREA 430 SF x 0 . 17 x 2/12 - 12 . 18 CF __ MEET EXISTING EDGE _-3o STORAGE REQUIRED : - 1527 . 18 CF _31- OF Pq!/EMENT FLUSH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ______ _______ SEE SHEET 4 _ _--- -' USE 2 DRYWELLS 12 ' DEEP (STORAGE CAPACITY - 1641 CF ) 3P Jan 30. JOR7 ]0.06 +zAS1 - _=�__ YA65 PA37 � -T LIL NYr ��. EM 3 /57 SYSTEM -- -- •3415��\\ / lse EX/STING Ur/L/TY POLE 'a 6.9 3o-___-- '°Teo 3z-- - N28%2:10"E TO BE RELOCATED /60.6 ' 3a3Y ROOF / PAVEMENT 9640 5F x 1 . 00 x 2/12 ' - 1607 . 00 CF -x x -- -�V 29.44'00"E _ _ LANDSCAPED AREA 1200 SF x 0 . 17 x 2/12' - 34 . 00 CF 27.55' OW l ,JV3` ��\ 36.`60 .30.7° TC 3075 OW-2A EXis7rmc 0 ]0.p ]aP7 STORAGE REQUIRED = 1 641 . 00 CF BC 30.25 ,' Ja" TC 30.65 ASPHALT 6E • 3413 BC 30.90 BC 30./5 CP ,]ass ^30.6E1) USE 2 DRYWELLS 12 ' DEEP (STORAGE CAPACITY 1642 CF ) t PROPOSED O rc 3200 „ \% Tc 3100 CONCRETE Q- 1GO 3150 "6C 30.50 / WALKWAY 11 SYSTEM 4 : PROPOSED WATER DW-2 SUPPLY WELL a �� + 30.96 /� \395 EX/ST/NG V ROOF / PAVEMENT 5360 SF x 1 .00 x 2/12' - 893 . 33 CF ro TC 0. / l • w W � BC 30.45 �/ � ASPHALT _(r LANDSCAPED AREA 1840 SF x 0 . 17 x 2/12 ' - 52 . 13 CF TO 31 GO 11 INvERr vSTORAGE REQUIRED 945 . 47 CF l TO 32001 BC3/./0 e ` BLDG.2Z 75 \ BC 3150 t O / \�3tOP 'rai • . o USE 1 DRYWELL 14 ' DEEP (STORAGE CAPACITY - 957 CF) 3 11 37 '32.56 TC ^] 4�t��� m��N .93. OO• L. \ 32/0 •3416 6.0.6.5 l/Jl OW-3A Bc 3/,60 1\ LEACHING POOL \ ' R/M 30.95 3140 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE INV.2690 SEPTIC TANK \ �1 \ STRUCTURE NO . TOP ELEVATION EFFECTIVE DEPTH INVERT ELEV N/F PHILIP 8 PA TRICA '323/ TO 32.30 �� RIM 3100 t✓ BC 30.65 1k -San / EXIST/NG WELL 3 /NV. /N 27.00 \ Q / TO BE ABANDONED PHILLIPS MARCO + ac 340.0 ��� INV OUT 26.50 3466 ' � +3430. \ / ------ PHILLIPS DW-1 TC 31 . 40 11 ' - O' TC 31.30 DW-2 TC 30 . 65 12 ' - 0' 26 . 40 Tc 347 BC 3420 BC 30.8 \/ OW-2A OR 30 . 45 12 ' - 0' 26 . 30 \\��\ TC wo _ _ 3 TC 30 . 75 Tc 32.05 ec 30.6.0 OW-3A GR 30 . 75 12 ' - 0' 26 . 40 3250 I \\\X32 \ BC 3155 •3410 TC 30.75 / 0 26 . 50 t L-- PROPOSED COIDEW4 y BC 30.25 DW-3 / DW-4 TC 31 . 70 14' - 0' NCRETES LK 3. \\ / ._ _-.-�I _ HOLE l \\San + + WTI UNIT UNIT 4 32. O TO 32.25 \1, 1 / .313c / l ` � N / -P 713 SF UN/T 5 ^3YJo 1 B313SF. 709,5$F _ BC 3125 \� / h BO9.B SF. 713 SF. rNVERTf �� 31p1 "'N � BLDG,27.75 I / SANITARY SYSTEM DESIGN + � � SED/STORY Bo9uN�T 7/ yX61 ,aeq / 4 p/NG 8313S,F. '^Jz6z + ELEVgF�R �OO�RIOGELINE 1 TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOW FOR SITE - 0. 86 AC. x 300 GPD/AC. - 258 GPD + 3J OO -� 3/ TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW FOR SITE : 3 !, •]z7 y , USER FLOOR SPACE USAGE FLOW FLOW 7c 32.00 7 �ti X11 �( FACTOR p rC 31.oo Tc 32/5 BC 3/.50\ BC 3/.65 32 so TC 3SAwcuT��� c3 o BCX5o i - - EXISTING BUILDING 575 SF OFFICE SPACE 0 .06 35 GPD ( UNIT 3 8 5 1426 SF OFFICE SPACE 0 . 06 86 GPD ISO 3/1.6060 °<°° ,57p UNIT 4 710 SF WET RETAIL 0 . 05 36 GPD N51 - UNIT 1 8 7 1663 SF DRY RETAIL 0.03 50 GPD •30.09 / \�3 UNIT 2 8 6 1620 SF DRY RETAIL 0 . 03 49 GPD M347o 3225 s\\\ \ tiH °29 PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB TOTAL PROPOSED FLOW 256 GPD TC TO MEET EXIST/NG CURB ac 3PIO `��PROPOSED FLOW - 256 GPD < ALLOWABLE FLOW - 258 GPD ; THEREFORE OK �� 3274 / 1 7C 32.951 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE / I / ALTHOUGH PROPOSED FLOW IS 264 . 1 GPD , USE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE FLOW OF / I CURB $ GUTTER. -3-451 ec 3z4 ,/ ,3313 TO 3275 __,� / I 450 GPD FOR SYSTEM DESIGN AS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE S .C.D .H . S . ' _-__---_ _-- - Co mEErCTNENG FLusETE GUTTER /430"W ec 32.25 gti i TO MEET EXISTING FLUSH 33 1� /SAWtUT E BOTH ENDS ° 20264' 1 " 1 30.+° .]0.51 30.4e, N/F JOHN 1 31P3 ELL/Or LAWSON 1 31.p/ 1 k� vJ I t Q PLAN VIEW ,]0.75 SCALE:I"=20' I 3333 �I I ., 5205 =30 3E/7 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED APPROX/MATE SPOT ELEVATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5v3 .3175 / GRADE ELEV. 31..7' CONTOUR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DK BR. - - - SANOYAOAM - - --0,5' FLOW 'ARROW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -� BROWN 25• LOAMY SAND CONCRETE 'CURB. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PgLE GROWN CATCH BASIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MEDIUM O To r70' DRYWELL / CONC. COVER. . . . . . . . COARSE SANG DRYWELL / COMB. INLET . . . . . . . . DATE REVISION PEAUA SH COMMONS NO ROOF GUTTER 3 LEADER . . . . . . . . . b--RD- - GROUNDWATER - " " ' ' �Sr(, OF NE1.p'y CUTCHOGLAE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, ENCOUNTERED SANITARY LINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 0�,. TEST HGEOSCI JOS Py } MaVONALD APRIL 6, 1983ENCE, F' 9 Steven J.HgmaH Associates APRIL 6, l9B9 SANITARY LEACHING POOL . . . . . . . � consulting engineers TES THOLE WATER SUPPLY LINE . . . . . . . . . . . . -w- g 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M/ N.T.S. UTILITY POLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ffl, NFp 0- 0596 �,�= SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE' A �' AS SHOWN 8764 ROPESSIONi`t' '&TENANNNGEINISOGCGMEMPNCFESSIGNAL ExCEP7evn GRAD/NG AND DRAINAGE PLAT. LICENSED ENGINEEP.ISILLEGAL" NASSAU SUFFOLK BLUEPRINTING VgR.ES 6- F/NISH£O GRADE CAMPBELL MANHOLE � PLAN - •. TYPE 6 NYSDOT FRAME A COVER 2 h� R - WEARING COURSE CAT, No. 1104A // \ 4.� <:,-..'. ' ..^ .: - " 6-REVEAL 0 BRICK 8 MORTAR SHIM '' RES RES — RES RES .mak..• �:X<.:,.: ,.:r.:�j.,^r_7:, 4"MIN, 12-MAX. HT6 _ CONCRETE S/OENl4LK .;Jr C,�f .;':�: ._ ,.;-;�. 4"DIA. PVC (SDR 35) 1 ' / CONCRETE CGPB � ; ti .. •': • . _ \ ///B"PER FT. \ / " TYPE 3 NYSOOT&WER COURSE SOLID PRECAST DOME /4R4RS 04 " ' 30" B" 6"STAEK/ZED BASE COURSE C-C EACH Nr4Y \ / MA/N ROAD R .Q (N YS RTE. 251 EX/ST/NG OFF/CE wALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE AN AVERAGE COMWRESS/VE STRENG77Y OF PROPOSED WATER EX/STING WELL OO SLAB PLAN SOHFALL�AB£��ED 0 20' OC AA0 AT DROP CC PCYV75� SUPPLY WELL /00, I TO BE ABANDONED /// RES O O D A-ggCKF/LL \ 4" CONC, COVER - WHERE SEE PLAN FOR PROPOSED Q' O CLEAN SAND APPLICABLE, SEE PLAN APPROPRIATE CASTING l / EX/STING WELL (TYP.J B GRAVE(. r PROPOSED GRADE SIDEWALK-CURB-PAVEMENT DETAIL BUILDING / ` • I y�,•r, (�— EXIST/NG CESSPOOL (TYP,) K Ta - LONG. BR/CK WITH NOR TARGARN \ PROPOSED SANITARY SYSTEM AND f 'PC MORTAR 4 GARS 04 "EACH WAY io PRECAST SUBJECT :Fs p SANITARY I PROPERTY d t O 0 RINGS $ 9 RA's L] ,` l5" CLA55/V RC' SOLID RING (L Es WQ W SSCI EDU�E FOR£ of `I I �{I" "A"= THE REQUIRED HORIZONTAL SEPARATION / Q / • O S BETWEEN WELL AND LEACHING POOLS >l50' ��Lnnn 1u ,NVERTS� I 300 ASPHALT ROOFAVG FELT .. I: /01_0" 3 FT. MIN. 2 EXTENLW✓G/' 0"BEYOND W y ` o 0 0 0 °J'' •� GRAVEL COLLAR . . A : ' —6"REVEAL W ❑ LLLTTip ; 4 ,� 0 0 0 0 /'_O" MOE SA AD B GRAVEL O !�570RM ORANJ R/NG�� COLLAR ALL AROGVO. 4 TYP B H9VEMENT ° WELL / SANITARY SYSTEM CLEARANCES ' . STORM DRAIN RhV - n . o • . I �- :.A SCALE.' /"=100' GROUNDWATER NOTE: ?'MIN 70 /O'-O"DVA. J GRO•'AVOWAT£R I'9„ WELL / SANITARY SYSTEM NOTES t' �I 1 . A TEST WELL IS PRESENTLY BEING INSTALLED ON-SITE IN THE LOCATION SAN/TARY LEACH/NG POOL SECT/ON SHOWN AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 'STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR Kr.� CONCRETE CURB DETAIL PRIVATE WATER SYSTEMS . DRYWELL WITH TRAFFIC SLAB NT.S 2 . AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME , THE S.C. D.H .S . SHALL BE CONTACTED TO PERFORM THE NECESSARY ANALYSIS. K T,.£ 3 . THE LOCATIONS OF THOSE WELLS AND CESSPOOLS SHOWN FOR THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM INFORMATION 4' 0" �A PROVIDED BY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS . _ 4. THIS FIRM HAS REPEATEDLY TRIED TO CONTACT THE REMAINING PROPERTY r'- -- - — EACH WAY AOWNERS VIA SITE VISITS, LETTERS , AND PHONE CALLS, TO OBTAIN THE /C _ 3 BALANCE OF INFORMATION BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL TO DATE . HOWEVER , 6"OIC E THROUGH LIMITED FIELD INVESTIGATION, IT IS OUR BEST w �p I SIDEWALX Qy B B APPROXIMATION THAT THE REMAINING CESSPOOLS AND WELLS ARE LOCATED `oI I o _ , gay BEYOND THE REQUIRED 150' BOUNDARY. v I y S. AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS , THE EXISTING WELL IN THE EXISTING OFFICE ' J CONTRACT/ON✓O/NT EXPEEANS/ON JO/NT BUILDING SHALL BE ABANDONED. THE NEW WELL SHALL SUPPLY WATER TO L EVE Y4' - "A"� PLAN SE£DETAL "e,. A BOTH BUILDINGS. PLAN PLAN 8 . SEE THE TWENTY ( 20 ) SCALE SITE PLAN ( SHEET 2 ) FOR CLEARANCES L FROM OTHER STRUCTURE TO WELLS, SUCH AS DRAINAGE DRYWELLS, CATCH CURB BASINS , ETC. CAMPBELL PATTERN No. 1104A PAVEMENT RAMP EDGE OF MANHOLE FRAME B COVER (TYP) 4'POURED CONCRETE SIDEWALK FLUSH, SMOOTH' BRICK 8 MORTAR SHIM 6"POROUS,MATERIAL TRANSITION 2 AS REQUIRED SEC TION ' u - - -= •—• JOINT SEALER INLET J 1 N (-� OUTLET i"RAO/Us #„ . 01A. Pvc (SDR 35) — SECT/ON A-A 4 1/4"PER FT. MIN (o I N m 1 I I 4"OIA. PVC ISDR 35J • . T' - , LJ I M oI I /.•/2 MIN. /..•l2 PAVEMENT SIDE RAMP 5/6P SURFACE 9wr 6u6, 10/10 I • • - e —FLARE FLARE WW MESH DETA/L "A " DETAIL "B" CURB v CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECT/ON B-B K T.S. SECTION SIDEWA L K RA MP - T YPE A 900 GALLON SEPTIC TANK N.T.S. N.T.S. SANITARY SEWER NOTES - 1 . ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SDR 35 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS . ALL PIPING EXITING THE BUILDINGS SHALL BE XH CAST IRON FOR A DISTANCE OF FIVE ( 5) FEET BEYOND THE FOUNDATION WALL . 2 . CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SHALL BE WITNESSED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER LICENSED TO PRACTICE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO CERTIFY TO THE SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES (S .C.D. H . S . ) THAT THE SANITARY SYSTEM HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS . 3 . CAST IRON COVERS SHALL BE SET APPROXIMATELY TWO ( 2) INCHES DATE REWISION PEAUASHCOMMONS HIGHER THAN THE GRADES ESTABLISHED ON THESE PLANS TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE S.C. D.H . S. REQUIREMENTS . OF NEW CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, 4P,AE y04 5 10 EPI y + ( � Steven J HymaH Assaclates consulting engineers 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite . SCALE: PROJ NO.: DAT Z"Fa °• 05915 AS SHOWN 8764 pROFESSIwAI/,'/ / °AUFRAnGN EM.EXCEPTBYA DETAILS .01 LICE sEOPROFESBIONALENGINEE ISILLEGAL" NASSAU SUFFOLK BLUEMINTING 30.54 30.35 - 30.36 \ Py,96 •3{9, MAIN .,{60. ROAD .3b, - _ - - ---3(0,y-� /r� RTE I] 1 3D _- -- - 1rt/+ rs /1 rE. 25) ",ali +3452 .5443 3[22 _ - J0.9s 30.SP - - ` 30.21 10.06 -_ __ © .• PA0.5 2A!] *29A1 L,L _ - _- .--- l5l - -.3u9 \ 30✓l '�SB 30✓1 .. .0 L IL B•LlL -___ _-_ _- _ _______ __-____ }___-__ 160 _ - -32 —* - - -- -.N 29.44'00E N28'1230E _ 180,6 3o3e 329e• --— + — � 3080 p 3x24 / 3E2 27.55' +3413 +30.18 ` 4I L+�• 8 rCk 30.21 — \\ 0.61 O+ \ ,� .1. 10.P2 ` C O.i2 1 . 31 i9 \ 3 p✓/ R 41C rlTI �( T�PSOIL 8 SEED '\\ s✓i J/, • N \\ + 3496 %/ / r ' lj w wIc REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT. FILL AS RE-OU/RED, O° \ �/ 4� ` 3{0 30'0 b TOPSOIL 8 SEED ^y/ 3 �[ 51\1 01 .� 3TC P-� 77 + 3038 �.30.I9 I t • \ / 3[M N/F PHILIP 8 PATRICA +32'51 ` PHILLIPS MARCO I 3 �`- 3166 + +3430 roll W IT/ 32+50 I `32\ +3{60 + PLANT NOTES TOPSOIL 8 SEED - -RD- -- 'F'O 1 PLANT NATIIRIALS TO BE FRESH DOG STOCKHIGHEST QUALITY LANDSCAPE 3225 l San % TOPSOIL 8 SEED j 2. CONTRACTOR TO CHECK LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES FOR ANY CONFLICTS WITH LANDSCAPING PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR PLANTINGS. "3230 / 3. ALL PLANT PITS TO HE BACKFILLED WITH. TOPSOIL NIXED WITH 0-20-0 Mqo RYD / STORY +3 " / FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF FIVE (5) POUNDS PER YARD. toop DING ,lzi, 3232 e�eNukMED FL� �1 4r / \ 9. ALL TREE PITS AND SHRUB BEDS '1'O BE MULCH, WITH 3" DEEP SHREDDED 11 T/an'- 33.oo �1 BARK MULCH. Q, RD II 3212 h 5. ALL SEED AND SOD AREAS TO RECEIVE FOUR (4) INCHES DEEP CLEAN A TOPSOIL. 3 sD yR' `' WT/ �( RD + 6. ALL SEED AND/0&SOD AREAS TO RECEIVE TEN (10) POUNDS 0-20-0 N. PER 1000 SF. 3172 "3ao9 ' 31 7. SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE 40 % RED FESCUE, 40 X TALL FESCUE, AND 20 % KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS. \ 3225 \ y 32P h . v k 6. ALL ' \ PLANT MA / TENIAL& TO BE GU Sze, M / GUARANTEED FOR A PIIRIUD OF ONE 1 ' YIIAR .323e A FTER ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER. \ / 2 . '� 3 .3224 / " 9. IF ANY DISCREPANCY EXISTS BETWEEN PLANT LISP AND THE PLAN, — _ 48Fi 20,# A THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. .3a15 I / I - --_-- 202 s4• I W 3{�! I +1,51N/F JOHN J12! SITE LIGHT(TYP.) ELLI07 LAWSON MWC LIGHTING CO. SAN JUAN SERIES SHARP CUTO \ / I. LUMINA/RES, "B"-TYPE MOUNTING ON/8'POLE• LAMP SHALL BE 20OW METAL HALIDE, 120V 11 & %3<ezCd WITH MEDIUM BRONZE ANODIZED FINISH, { IQ I PLANT LIST ' 3339 �Ik� QUANTITY KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON SIZE ------ NAME �..= '=---. --REMARKS............... .".30 J, 2 Ck CORNUS KOUSA KOREAN DOGWOOD 8' - 10' Ht . B S B, F d D, WB 5 71 T I L I A CORDATA LITTLE LEAF LINDEN 2 1 /2' - 3' Cal . B A 8, WB 122 it JUNIPERUS SABINA TAM TAM JUNIPER 15' - 18' Spd . 3 GAL CONTAINER, F d D 3 Tc TSUGA CANADEN IS CANADIAN HEMLOCK 4' - 5' Ht . B d B, F 8 D THIS PLAN IS FOR LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING O Y. 26 Ic ILEX CRENATA CONVEXA CONVEX LEAF JAP. HOLLY 24' - 30' Spd. 3 GAL CONTAINER, F 8 D FOR GRADING, DRAINAGE, 8 SANITARY SEWER 46 FI FORSYTHIA INTERMEDIA BORDER FORSYTHIA 3' - 4' Ht . B 8 B, F 8 D, WB INFORMATION, SEE SHEETS 2 8 J. Ht . - height Spd - spread Cal . - caliper 19 4' from ground - 0 8 B - ball and burlap F 8 D - full and dense 17B = well branched I DATE RIEVISION PEOUASH COMMONS ytPtE DF New rDR CUTCHOGUE, TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, NEI y Stevea J.Hymaa Associates (511- consulting engineers 1 m2s a 2�w 3505 Veterans Memorial Hwy., Suite M/Ron 1 �opR4ff '1059 8a\ �v SCALE: PROJ. NO.: DATE. RfSSIONN l"a 20' B764 JU "NS1 TIONOF INIGOOCUMENI EXCEPi9YA LANOSCAP/NG AND LIGHTING PLAN \ LICENSED PflOFEIRI)M ENGINfffl IS ILLEGAL' NPSSAU SUWOLK 6WEPRINTIN4