The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1000-84.-1-26.2 �P �S �E P� Wz/h In Ala C /� C Well E3 _� S8.3 A N C L o f Co 0 O U N — se.e S oP eirE Q. --- - ( 49.5' WIC/Be { --- 25 sc.e ./ 2 m 592 369.00' 11^- c„/b Rs_AOB 40 <q�f NE n --- — 373.22' ✓ 59_.1 w N r�1 co S LA �- 1111 —' ---- _ 8 sig { ma P e S WITHIN 150' SEPTIC SYSTEM * ;\- l KEY MAP rrc rb SCALE, l' = 600' 58.G RADIUS OF S 15 ' N�EAHING POOLS Jr, II _ � r R .� • cver J � Ier ye � In Dov do aV � 5 "5 S 60°2152 59,3 + s9^ / ;hold TeN^ ® 25 melt )a\ 1 / 5�` 0 4 3 2 a5 ® ' � y N 7 V d ' 1 � q / I y /4- l3 .r� -59 9 // l(D odc O / GST IRON FAME ANO COVER TO WAOE Q p ,rte 5s M /9 � a i _ E - 1 �v4 / -re59G r`3 22 21 2� I — _ c".re' V 2 M E yr5�•O I bldg iz'NIr1 P a c.0i f1'/�� a xi'Mv� 1 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE T` '8 ® ° 2`I " y a O 2M� 25 ® \ s 7 � d ZS 27 2� NG I-IC — c,.� P ani r olti - JA/Pa'NESE MAPLES - 3' HT. 29 l'P' 9 N I h\ 11 ,{( a N /� L�rb 7 P1°E P1rChFL C1 JAPANESE BLACK PINE - 5'-6 HT. \J Mw wen_ o owner G 5�'7 U Gane P A, / 91 /�)7 AWL ,'IXA. P cuss z,OO PA>E �S ALBERTA SPRUCE - 4' HT - / "I' PiTam W.1/91/11 Gr � P /1 W \\'' ® GfP ?L5919 L mY . � � PnL� m CAST IRON COVERS SUGAR MAPLE 21//12'-3" CALIPERh- �,p r yJ 5 8.5 r 5� Tt' / 29' 2' Ma 24' C ® U6f3E11 2v1 Iona re46Ill 1n9 a Q ] INLET 'MIN. a O O 5� G° rcln fart cd g5' I Q, i - OUTLET t 9 P rap u m I I \ / MIN. 4'DIA. y I N FLOW LINEC ASS 2400 9) level 60 PIPE OR EOUIV. e CLASS 2400 PICHED /911/' PIPE OR EQUIV. 0 32 g3 34'o CL e1 0 0 4�,e 2° � a , ' \ .S h — PITCHED 1/e'/l' 3 J o 3 / El _P L e59O / rop _- - AS 570 i T� c O FL/GC ba'th"a^ s 4 58 - - �6P 58 ECJ 5 } or,b T.595 .1 zt m"E callow.rE< IO' a =rM" " CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK 3� 3(y o _ - / _ - r of (n r N0 ll OF WELL PO NITS ETC ' RADIUS 12 aAsnFro i sRAT°vcz.T TO eE CLFiN ` I0 LFI An lj o� CJS DM R — i / / `L FS - / \ TeP W� M TEFIALSAWITHIN 50' OF 42 N J m - - - - - - - - - ' - \A TYPICAL LEACHING POOL a well WELL POINT Q4'obo� c43�/hon co✓er w — — / I O P {(o ckharf A638/8 � I I]YPE 684'r� or e9ud/ — 1 fl sheilde6 e 59 -I- pn. ,`nis/ied /adt � ® LPs St? li9n{ Fed' S � I ) c ° Pdow/' m1 lsad, /f/n Or sc 9 ® _ P� �F�ood� DRAINAGE CRITERIA e TI9r 475 ° 'L� AREA = 2.6 Acres I / c = 0.85 R P ❑ =j P e 4 A'1° o' Lm Q V 2 Y77 C n s TAWYMTzt ` nnp ° A5 ` 43 P V � � O � / rc5� � � uz,lsoW resr ISO SAL 0 = Aci l�bn q) ® � N 'll L'P ^� 5]3 Ir�Ts• 0=0 TMW = 2.6 ' x' 0.85 x 25 60" x 28 = 9282 cu.fl. a: a b rc sa a r o- s -� �I \Q5 - 3Eaw I MAW P�ness aoAPrcN 9282'142.2 = 220 V.F.112= 'l8 I.p.s S leaching secllons b Tc 57tq Tj I 50 I �L P Provide 19 ' 1.ps 8'0 12 deep or equal w Sr CASN6 n T NSF I ASM STAMAR E 5k 53 I N Y— 11141600 resr MATma PARKING CRITERIA - �W PVC mr� 57'r _ - - G P - u �sLA�Rm.ePt�us1 wui PRen 2 ssvRE sorra OFFICE 2400sq.11. 24 9r wa-fer T`s L.5 © ` - a / { lr 5G 5 A srKep STORAGE 21000 2/ 3.LEMN K REPAIR (Maintenance) '600 sq.11. 2 EMPLOYEE 20 'i4 WELL DETAIL 67 spacesDRAINAGE LEACHING POOL Provided 68 spaces L P5 I've / 5� 5 TEST BORING (e4 !OS 6(D lower \ TOPSOIL SANITARY DESIGN >6P 5$ y9 6001 \ \ I z SANDY LOAM POPULATION DENSITY ZONE IV 300/ga//day - 6.91 acres = 2073 gal ® ® - - _ - - - - - - - `- - 5 \ I wTH OFFICE. 2400 sq. 11. 2400=O.C6gpd. = 144gpd. c sty --- '® - _ _ - - _ _ qB o aI1 _ _ - ` J SOME STORAGE 8 REPAIR = 22800 sq.11. �y " ^, GRAVEL 22800 , 0.04 gpd. =912 god. rel' \ Ix 1056 g.p.d. ani Q SEPTIC TANK 171 2 da g.p.d. 2 days /low = 2/12 g.p.d. 595 \ 1 Provide 2500 gal. SEPTIC TANK 10'0 5' Deep w LEACHING POOLS boor \ J I- p 1056 gad. d a" 105611.5gal.1sq./l. = 704/25.1 =28 V.F. a PROVIDE 4 l.ps 8'0 2 deep TRAFFICE FLOW DIRECTION Z 39 % = EXISTING EL EVA TIN — \ j AL k = DRAINAGE LIMIT LINE = PROPOSED ELEVATION \ I\\ CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO NGVD. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVED PARKING AREAS 1/ 1112" ASPHALT 2 112" BINDER --�� STABILIZED COMPACTED BASE \ I §p W _ \ N \ \S 0 -LOW DENSITY MUSHROOM - TYPE LIGHT ULAREA = 6.910 Acres � � - - - - - - - - - -_ - - - �\ \\ ZONING DISTRICT LI RREDISTRICT 29 SCHOOL DISTRICT #9 U \ \ SUP,FOLi( 1,Ut1Pll r oYAdIBIfifYT Or 4I'Mll SERVICES \ \ y APPROVED FOR CONST11400N WAY pg, ' Uo,r9g-00 dor y \ \ \ iuls w,JI Val is grafted'or the constrnctipn of i ; Ip \ m -iisu;zaf Poli water su tarilipL� Iulsuant to n'. ' � ' c. nor implied approval to ri:,rhayr, from or m;cu, - ;Te strncticl„);iimvn.TNI;nfPltOvFLEXPIRESidr ;W018 I FROM ME GATE BELOW. p 510AIURE is - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - _ - - - - \ \ PLANOFPROPERTY FOR \ RICHARD W. CORAZZINI \\ \\ \\ A T CUTCHOGUE w \ \ TOWN OF SOU THOLD, N. Y. w � 1 o \ \\ 1000 - 84 - 01 - 262 M 3 SCALE' 1 20' " = z \ o JUNE 14, 1993 Z J \ I \ NO. DATE REVISION Q \ V \ \ N I 815193 ADDITIONS 8 REVISIONS 2 213194 LOWER LEVEL, PARKING 8 \ \ V DRAINAGE 3 41/2194 ADDITIONS d REVISIONS a \ \ \ J \ \ \ 4 7111/94 B.O.H. REVISIONS 5 7/19195 B.O.H. REVISIONS \ \ J \ \ \ 6 11112195 1 H.S. APPROVAL STAMP TRANSFERRED FROM PRINT \ \ \ \ \ 7 /2/091945 REVISED BLDG, d LAYOUT 9 1/5/96 REVISED BLDG. d LAYOUT ^\ O \ \ II \ \\ \ W \ \ 40 \ Q_ 1 II 1 1 1 o \ / I I APPROVED �Y S. 44'020" 0 \ / U I PLANNIPIG BOARD 4/.40' E. / IFOVVN OP SCUT140LD TE rid 8, too / 42 / 1 HNA E'r03' 14`•x' w� Ilw 500.85' 5ti F.nF Plpe - z �nb -� Nl P u S. LIC. NO. 496/8 -— - N. 5731'13" W. O W N OWNER P b ° S S, P.C. TOWN CUTCHOGUF, N. Y of SOUTHOLD RICHARu W. coRAzzlNl F. LUPIN DRIVE P.MAIN N ROAD SOUTHOL D, N.Y. 11971 93-159 - PLANNING BOARD NIFMB�S Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G_WARD pry O Chairman -i h� G2 * P.O. Box 1179 I ' GEORGE RPTCHIE-LATHAMSouthold, New York 119.1 w,,JR. 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSEI,JR. ,y n WILLIAM J. CREMERS O ® v Telephone(516) 765-1938 I-MNNETH L.EDWARDS 'l 0� PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 9, 1996 Fa Henry Raynor M P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 J. Re: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM# 1000-84-1-26.2 -i Dear Mr. Raynor: ..01 The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, April 8, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys dated January 5, 1996. Conditional Ri final approval was granted on January 29, 1996. All conditions have been fulfilled. Enclosed please find a copy of the survey which was endorsed by the I Chairman, and the comments from the Architectural Review Committee. .l j Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. i Sincerely, i Richard G. Ward Chairman encs. cc: Tax Assessors Building Dept. Ili SITE PLAN wk, :13 Presubmission conference (within 30 days of written request) .•.. 'Complete application received (within 4,months,of presub. conference) 4Aplication t�eviewed at work sessionMR Akz ` (within 10 days of receipt) !T Lw`J lkp.plicant advised of necessary revisions (within 36 days of review) r ZD Re N iced submission received aro. it �ri `y F rJ ,� • Lend Agency Coordination - SEARdetermipation AKq , FC -',f;zfp f ,SFl+f elt614 Nz} L"C' f�a'ja6 o REE) RItED TO: o •a 0 " I Zoning Board of Appeals _ se vsr oz (written comments within 60 days of request) w %. '�0°L Board of Trustees OK i.K HBuilding Department (certification) " �'' "t.!° 9 oK D uWw. Suffolk County Department of Planning ro` oK caR iAQ Department of Transportation -State "57 oK zo ua7L � �,•, Department of Transportation - County taro. OK a � TI Suffolk County Dept. of Health ✓ ✓OKfnw ro. OK Fire Commissioners ,w��L Y, /f Sent: 12 ,P- 73 n Received-/°-/-Z-7-3 RECEIVED: Draft Covenants and Restrictions 'roe °K Filed Covenants and Restrictions W7. Landscape plan ,"ro- oK Lighting plan PMQ inro. OK WE aK Curb Cut approval 'M Health approval G _ '"D9L 'Drainage Reviewed by Engineer ;SEY7i" P' JA�r � /e-2 Approval of site plan '- -with conditions f Endorsement of site plan Certificate of Occupancy inspection ro.`PEFoK One year review ",,. oK r la y� I Z k. szrf Lai; Southold, N.Y. 11971 pilu - DEC 2 9 19,95 ,!f (516) 765-1938 1 1 SaUr,HOLD 344;+FLIMMUG BOARD E . APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN Date of Application Filing Fee Date Recd New Use X Change of Use Re-Use_Extension of Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval ) Other Specify ****************** Name of Business or Site Richard W. Cor-azzini I Location of Site w/s Cox Lane, cu c ogue, ew or Address of Site, if available Name of Applicant Henry . . Raynor, Jr . Address of Applicant 320 Love Lane, Mattituck, NY 11952 Telephone 298-8420 Person to be responsible for Construction Telephone Applicant' s interest in site-check one: Owner of Land Agent for 8 Under contract to purchase_ I Owner of Fee Title to Land Richard w. Corazzini Address 100 Lupen Road, Cutchogue, NY Telephone 7331 -5824 i Site Plans Prepared by Li o n e ,zger License No. 49618 Address Peconic Surveyors , Main Road Telephone 765 -5020 Southold, NY 11971 ********************* Total Land Area of Site 6 . 910 acresSq.Ft. Zone District BC Existing Use of Site storage Proposed Use of Site storage Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure(s) 0 sqft. sqft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) S ZOb sqft. sqft. Pecent of Lot Coverage by Building(s) % Pe cent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) n % Pecent of Lot for Landscaping(where applicable) Da um( Specify)U.S.G.S. x Other Has applicant be Bord of Appeals en granted a variance and/or special exception by �I Ca e Number Name of Applicant Da e of Decision Expiration. Date Wil-11 any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? 110 If so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION ( EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UNDERTAKEN UNTIL APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNING BOARD. k.9 APPLICANT' S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK Richard w. Corazzini being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at rJORoad, Cutchogue, NY in the State of New York, and that he is the owner of the above poperty, or that he is the President: of the Corazzini Asphalt (Title) (Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation) owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required site improvements in accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Southold for the area stated herein. and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-way, have been clearly established and are shown on said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes upon any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as to lots and as to roads; that he has examined all rules and reaulatibns adopted- by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans and will comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the approval of the Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordance with the plans submitted. Signed (Owner) Sworn to before me this day of 19 (Notary Public) Signed (Partner or Corporate Officer and Title) �✓ PART 1—PROJECT iNFORMiiAilbN Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in deierminin-g whether the action proposed may have a sionifican[ eti2c: on the environment. Please compiete the entire form, Parts A through E- Answers to these questions will be considered -as parlor the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion or the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION sii;e plan of Richard W. Corazzini LOCATION OF ACTION (Include Street Address, btunicipalrty ane County) w/s. Cox Lane, Cutchogue, New York s NAMEQP APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Henry E. Raynor, Jr. 298•-8420 AD'DAESS 320 Love Lane CITY[FO S7ATE I zip ccDE Mai;tii;uck, NY 11952 NAMEOF OWNER(If different) EUSINESS TELEPHONE i Richard W. Corazzini I I ' ADDRESS' 100 Lupen Drive CITY/PO i STATE Z'P CCOE Cutchogue NY 11935 DESCRIPTION OF ACTIGN construct; office and equipment storage building I Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N-A_ if not applicable I' A. Site Description i Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: OUrban XIndustrial ❑Commercial C33estdential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) `I ❑Forest ❑Agriculture []Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 6 • 9 acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland ('Non-agricultural) 6 . 9 :Teres 6 ' 9 acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes Orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) .acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECI.) acres acres Nater Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acrei acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3- What is predominant soil C;pe(sl on projeei site? top soi 1 and bank run sand a. Soil drainage: ]CWell drained 100go of =.ite ❑"ooderately well drained °5 of site C'Poorh, dramod 9, „f site b If anv agriCllLural and is involved, how many acres of soil are cI.ISifiod Within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land Classification System! acres (See 1 NYCRR 3'O1. 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes tNo a What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 S. Approximate percencL e of prrty�Fd project site with ;lopes. X0-10 0 96 ❑li1-1596 % ❑159/0 or oreater 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes ENO 7.-Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Resister of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ENO + 90 8. What is the depth of the water table? (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes j.�No 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? ❑Yes SW NO - 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal lite that is identified as threatened or endangered? []Yes RiNo According to upon information and belief Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e_, cliffs, dunes. other geological formations) ❑Yes ENO Describe r 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes j7Na If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ENO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: riorie a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary I�. 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to Project area: a. Name none b. Size (In acres) r 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? gYes ENO a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? L ENO t, b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? Vies ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified Pursuant to ^.griculture and Markets Law, Article 25-.AA, Section 303 and 3047 ❑Yes LNa 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes 3No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ,wasm6? []Yes EZNo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as approhnite) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by [)reject sponsor 6 . 9 aces. _ b. Project. acreage to be developed: 1 • 25 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 5 . 65 acres. d Length of project, in miles (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate per( ,91 of expansion proposed I. Number of off-street parking spaces 'xistinj: 0 propn,ed 53 g. Maximum hiCular ;rips generated per hoar 6 (upon Cpmp coon Of projC•Cl)? h. If residential. Number and 1�f)c of 1)nurim• uniti: One Family Two Fainly "lidutilc I ,lrmly CPndorilln1Um Ininally Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structureper Coclipe�ight: 60 .width: 210 length. I. Linear feet of frontage along a oubhc thoroughfare project will occupy is? +370 ft 3 How much natural material roar, earth, etc.I will bn removed fror> e sire? _ tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? LxYes 0, IN []N/A a. If yes, for what intend__ purpose is the site being reclaimed? Plantings & grass b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation1 1EYes ❑No -- C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? aY'es ❑No 4- How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed From site? D acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? ❑Y'es L�No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 12 months. (including demolition). 7. If mufti-phased: a. Total number of phases an.ticioated (numberj. b- Anticioated date of commencement phase l month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year- d. Is phase 7 functionally dependent on subsequent ohases? Dyes ❑No 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes 3dgo 9_ Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. shill project require relocation of anv projects or facilites? ❑Yes iNNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes 1-n No a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? 2h,es ENO Type septics 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? E,11 C5 L�No Explain IS. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? F_-Yes XNo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? ❑Yes [INo a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes, give name ocatibn d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill' ❑Yes ❑No e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes IgNo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons;monLh. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? year. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes XN1 19. Will project routineiv produce odors (more dran one hour per day)r ❑Ye5 ?C]NO 20. Will project produce operating noise exceedinq the loc-d miibient noise Ie.:els? ❑Ye, c' ..No 21. Will project result in an incrujxe in rrwrgy UIQ? &,(es ❑Nu If yes , indicate types) _electricity 22. If water supph, iy irom s.ai,, irufica[r pumlvmq cap. LAV - g,tlluns;minu[e. 23. Totaf anticipated water usagr per day 275 gallunsrday. 24. Does Project invoke Local, State or Icdera! fundingr ❑Yes ZNo i If Yes, explain Z 4 -w 25. Apprnvals Required: f_,N Submittal hype Date City, Town, Village Board GYes No City, Town, Village Planning Board Ly`r'es 0 N o -City, Town Zoning Board []Yes ❑No City, County Health Department KIYes ❑No Other Local Agencies Dyes ❑No OCrier Regional Agencies Eyes ❑No SCPC review State Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Federal Agencies ❑Yes ❑No C_ Zoning and Planning Information I . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? [�Yes ❑No If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision nsite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classirication(s)of the site? LI 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present >_oninV per code 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? LI 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoningz per code C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? Eyes ❑No 7. 'A hat are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a !: mile radius of proposed action? LI and AC B. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining,%surrounding land uses within a Y. mile? :n Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 110. Will proposed action require any authorizations) for the formation or`9ewer or water districts? ❑Yes ExNa 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? iYes ❑No a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? RYes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation or traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes tNo a- if yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your protect. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please d15r US5 such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided ,rho%,- is true to the best or my knowledge F Ap{yhi ,'Spuwsor N,rme Rt Cf:✓-;;r7zT" c D.itc 4 r'-- Signature - .,��-... S f�. .r's.3�i�� Title ��,iz�/ If the action is in the/, oastal Area, and you are a slate agency, unnpletc rhe Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THE][J��AAGNITUDE Responsibility of lead Al Cncy�•✓ General Information ;Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations beer reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst •_ Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated ;n PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simpN asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold or magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State anc for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and!or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will varv. Therefore, the examples are illustrative anc have been offered as guidance_ They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will he anv impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers- c- If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impactrill occur but threshold is lower than example, check column T. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentiaiN large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be miti-,ated by changeis) in the project to a small to moderate Impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Pcta nal Can impact Be IMPACT ON LAND %Ioderate I Large %ditigated Ey i Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a phvsical change to the project site? CNO EYE 5 Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ Cl es No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ L7 Yes 1-:1 No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or ,,encrally within ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. " • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or inVUIVO more U Li Eyes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining pur:oses that would remove more rhan 1,000 ❑ U ❑Yes ON c, tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per yoar. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. F ❑ ❑1"es 2-No Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Ye, ❑iN,0 Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. +.VIII Ihere lie an effect h. _.w ur..Llkle or unusur.i I„nd tnuns found an the site? (i.e, cliff5, dunes, ;geological Forniauons, etc )LINO LIYE5 Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ryes ❑No Z 0 _ A 1�% 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential .Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact I Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, '_5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL') ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [INC) • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No protected stream. Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ;Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ Q Eyes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area or any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area ❑ ❑ El Yes ON • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ L:Yes ❑No I 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater - quality or quantity? ❑NO DYE 5 Examples that would apply to column 2 Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action requires use of a source or water that does not ❑ ❑ --]Yes ❑'No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. .y • Proposed Action requires water supply from veils with greater than 45 'No ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination or a water ❑ ❑ QYes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No • Liquid effluent will be convey--J off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. - • Pronosed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likelv cause siltation or other discharge-into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or rhumical Q ❑ nYes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in meas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes I:]N o and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commerrial amllor industrial uses which may j ❑ ❑ ies ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste tri-mmeni, ano;or storage I fa c c I ti CS. _ • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes 7--No G. Will proposed action ,Ater drainage Now or patterns, or surface 1 F.water runoff? CNO ❑'; :5' i Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would c`range flood water flows. ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No 7 1 3 Small to Potential I Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ Eyes ENO • Proposed Action is incomoaoble with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ Eyes ENO ❑ • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ Eyes El No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO ' I i IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ❑NO ❑YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given Q ❑ ❑Yes ENO , hour- • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ QYes ONO refuse per hour. - Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑'r'es ❑No : heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount or land committed ❑ 7- ❑'r es ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑let ENO development within existing industrial areas. Other impacts_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or end:angered species? GNO uYE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the Nev, York or federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site - • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ 111'-35 ENO than for agricultural purposes. - • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes ENO 9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ❑N'O 1]YE5 Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ _'Yes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. Proposed Action requires the removal of more Ihan 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑'1'as No Of mature forest (over 100 years of agc) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES i 10 Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? I [-,NO ❑1Es Examples that would apply to Column 2 j The praposed action would sever. cross or limit access to agnuJtural ❑ ❑ ! EYes ENO land (includes cropland, haynelds, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.). i 8 1 • 1 1 2 3 Small to l Potential f Ca-11 mpac t Be Moderate I Large I MitigatedBy Impact I Impact Project Change f Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No i _ agricultural land- - • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres Yes []No of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. j • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No land management systems (e.q., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, Istrip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a :arm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ G 1 ❑'(es QNo 1 t IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? CN0 OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 61721, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from Li ❑ Eyes F-1 No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their ` enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. it • Project components that wiil result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ LJ Yes. No screening of scenic views Lnown to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES i 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO OYES - Examples that would apply to column 7 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑y"es EJ No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑1'es []No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Eyes F-1 No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION U. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of e.xi,nng or future open spaces or rec auonal opportunities? Examples dkat would apply to r:olumn :' ONO LIN ES The permanent roreclocure of a suture rocreadonal opportunity. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [:]No A mayor reriuecion Or an open space important to the community. ❑ I ❑ Eyes ❑No Other impacts: ❑ ❑ QYes ❑No IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 2 3 S all to Potentia! Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation sysfens? fvl0deratcc Large Mitigated By ❑NO CYES Impact Impact I Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 !f • Alteration of Present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 1J No Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ U ❑Y'es ENO Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO I IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ENO C•fES - Examples that would apply to column 2 ` Proposed Action will cause. a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. Proposed Action, will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ ❑Yes (D No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two famtiv residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. Other impacts: L—Yes ONo NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? - ':'N'O __1 YE Examples that would apply to column 2 • ©lasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or ocher sensitive ❑ U ❑Y'es ENO facility_ • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ Eyes ❑NO — r • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the locaE l ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that v.ould acr as a ❑ J ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ENO IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? CNO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ El Yes ON substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑yes ONO form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ Eyes ENO gas or other flammable !iquids. • Proposed action n:.ry rexilt in the ever,ivation or c0wr disturbance I ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 0 N within 2.000 feet of a Site used for the dtsnosal of soli or ha:.trdous III4 waste. • Othor impacts: IJ ❑ Eyes ONO 10 1 2 3 ` IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be I OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD I+loderate Larce Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing Community? Impact Impact Project Change ❑NO ❑YES 1 Examples that would apply to column 2 1 i • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO project is located is likely to grow by more than 506. I • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ I Eyes C1 No j • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ON • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures L ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO J (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc_] • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑Np Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment ❑ '❑ ❑Yes [-]No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO "ES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 _ Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be pot eii[ially large, even if the impacts) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mirigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project chanee(s). _ Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonabie to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance. consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost msources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional conuvquence of the impact • Its ptotertial diven;ence from local nerds and .;oats • Whether known otijectionc to thy prplrct relate to thn impair t. (Conr;nue on .ittachntents) Z 11 [sH ri 17.21 SEAR Appendix S "�"'te Environmental Quality Review + This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question I I of Part 2 of the Full ERF- (To be completed by Lead Agency) ! Distance between - Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) I. Would the project be visible from: 0-';; -!/ -3 3-5 5 + • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the Nationai or State ❑ ❑ ❑ L! ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • State Parks? ❑ L ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? '` ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • Nationai Park Service lands? r' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L7 as Part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 7— or or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑ ❑ U ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2- Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e-, :,creened by summer foliage, but visible dw irIg other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No I i 3- Are any of thr rese,.! Qs ch-:cked in que:.iion 1 used by the public Juring the time of Lar during which the project wol be vc"ble? 'Yes El No JIII I - :w J DESCR[PTlON OF Erq,,;TING VISt1AL ENVIRGNi�'IENT � I 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding I environment. Within mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped J Forested ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond <J ❑ : Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ I J Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ t Mountainous U i Other — ❑ E 1 :`TOTE: add attachments as needed A t 5. Are there visual) similar projects within: t Y P 1 J! *I/z mile IJ Yes ❑i`!o ! I '1 miles ❑Yes ❑No I j *2 miles El Yes ❑No ` 1 `3 mires ❑Yes 17 No f ' Distance from project site are provided For assistance. Substitute other distances as acprcpnate. EXPOSURE j 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unkric.cn, use best estimate. 4 CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is � FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ At worksite ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ i I 2 TO cn D ' Southold. N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 !!!� APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE PLAN i Date of Application Filing Fee i, t3`•s5', Date Rec'd - New Use change of Use _Re-Use_Bxtension of-..Existing Use Revision of an Approved Site Plan (Date of Approval ) Other specify Name of Business or SiterRichard [d-.' Cola !!!( Location of Sitewyjis__Cox ta',A _:Cti.r`c�Hwsue . -N&is York t Address of Site, if available Name of Applicant Aa=:n,y a . Ravnnr sr . t Address of Applicant 3�o r.wP Lane Battitii.mlc_ 'NY ' 11952 ' Telephone 2�9V8420 ` Person to be responsible for Construction ._ F' Telephone Applicant' s interest in site-check one; ewr �a`nd+A,-tint, for y Under contact to purchase_ l(( Owner of Fee Title to LandRichard4W'.-',Cci7eA ,zin,r Address ld0'- LuQen,Dr�ive . CutchbRue , ' NY TeLephone A704-.-AB i. Site Plans Prepared by _'JohiiVUletzQer License No. NF%%6W [ Address penonic Surveyors , Main Road Telephone .17,0-57,210 4 f¢ Southold , NY 11971 ********************* Total Land Area of Site K' 9to ac • Sq.Ft. Zone District BC Existing Use of Site ,� '�r`x-gyp Proposed Use of Site _''sft.wya,gte-v Gross Floor Area of Existing Structure( s) p • •. sgft. sgft. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Structure(s) UiAe .p sVt . sqft. Percent of Lot Coverage by Building( s) o✓ % Percent of Lot for Parking (where applicable) oat % Percent of Lot.-'for Landscaping(where applicable;). 016 'i- ;iti Da,tum(Specify)U.S.G,.S . x j Other. Ua� applicant been granted a variance and/or specLal ex.'ceptipn by Board of Appeals Case Number Name of Applicant Date of Decision Expiration Date Will any toxic or hazardous materials, as defined9by the Suffolk County Board of Health, be stored or handled at the site? dd, - If, so, have proper permits been obtained? Number and Date of permit issued NO ACTION (EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION) MAY BE UZ+L i F:!I.XF E!i !RI I IL_-`J � AL OF' SITE PLAN BY THE PLANNINGBOARD. V, y 3 6 ,& J11 L ULC ti`tet APPLICANT' S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK being duly sworn, deposes and says that he resides at y � z_ca � - f C�� - @f�' in the State of New York, and that he is the ,owner of ' the ab M_. property, or that he is theg�y '� of the rhm?T•i.,) % (Title) ( Specify whether Partnership which is hereby making application; that the or Corporation)' owner or his heirs, successors or assigns will, at his own expense, install the required Site improvements in, accordance with Article XIII of the Code of the Town of Sotathold for the area' stated 'hhe-rein and that there are no existing structures or improvements on the land which are not shown on the Site Plan; that title; to the entire parcel, including all rights-of-Way, have been clearly establishcc% and are i shown on. said Plan; that no part of the Plan infringes^'uton any duly filed plan which has not been abandoned both as `to lots and as to roads,; that he has examined all rules, and regulations adopted by the Planning Board for the filing of Site Plans andmill comply with same; that the plans submitted, as approved, will not be altered or changed in any manner without the- approval of tahe Planning Board; and that the actual physical improvements will be installed in strict accordar}nig! wit e Plans submitted. Signed - I (Owner) iSworn to before me d s 12, day -of F bj&4�' k 19 j (Notary Public) Signed MELANIEN.WO (Partnertorpor Off and Title) :4 Aarf Pubk Swe of N YO* No.4908712 0„aEf W In Suft(oi* a "Omrr-Wnn fnkee Od.19.19 i 4 c t f "14.18-4-(7157)=Text 12 C PROJECT I.D. NUMBER - 617.210 SEQA h } Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR. 2. PROJECT NAME Iltan�ry Raynor.,4Agent for R . Cor-az.zini site plan application j - - 3, PROJECT LOCATION: - I f ` I{ Menlclpanty &,tctio ue , Town of `Southold county Suffolk - 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road Intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or provldb map) SIB Cox Lane , Cutchog,ue , New -York ( 1000-84-�-pfo 26.)a- i 5: IS PROPOSED ACTION: ❑New ❑Expansion ❑Modlficallonlalteratlon I e- DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: _ ( gi congt.ruct .office- and equipment storage building - 3 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially Fiq acres UltimatelyA- $ - acres a. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ^ LIYes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9- WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? 10L� Residential glnduslrlal ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑ParWForestlOpen space ❑Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? ®Yes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permittapprovals SCDOHS - water &. sewer It- DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes ®No If yes,list agency name and permitlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes ENO I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AppllcanUsponsor; name: Henry Raynor , A.eent for R. C o r a z z in Dale: 6 /28 /93 Signature: ��7'LiT�—P r n. 7/ l- If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 P RT it E,NVISONM'ENTAL ASSESSMEAT (To be completed by Agency) .f A. DOES ACTION❑ EXCEED ANy TfPE I THRESHut4 IN 6 Iti`CFR, PART 61;.12? If yes,coordinate thereviow process and use the FULL.EAP r Yes Ic1.Ivo y14 IS WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be supersed�e/d by another Involved agency. F El Yes C40 ,C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) 14 CS_ Existing art quality, surface or groundwater qualify or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, .potential ter erosion,drainage or flpbding problems? Explain briefly. 't. Raes[hetic, agricultural,archaeological,historic, or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character? Explain briefly: tionorfauna,fish,shellfish orwildlife species, significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: Sommunity's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly. rowth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. i ^•on term, short term,cumulative, or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly. II Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)?Explain briefly. i i,t { ERE,OR ISEIE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? r 'd, Yes WN a If Yes, explain briefly l' Z [( t L III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) t� - TRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. h effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) eyersibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that r Ilanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ➢1 !! Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur- Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachme s as necessary, the re sons supportin this determination: i Name of Lead Agency ); /9' s SSG Print ��/RJ¢Spon O fieer in Lea Agency Tale of Responvble Of icer CI ISArdrture of Kesponnom Orficer in Lead Agency t Signature of Preparer(It diterent trom responsible officer) r cW-��7— 7- Date I 2 Ig, - 7� 1¢16-2 (21871-7c ++ 617.21 SECIR Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM 1 Purpose: The full EAF is designed tohelp applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an..action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental ` analysis. In addition,manywho have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,-comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a prc�Ct or action. Full EAF Components: The full FAF is comprised of three parts: �I Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. I Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. F {` DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions j< Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Par[ 1 ❑ Part 2 ❑PafL 3 `? C Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: 1 ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not y have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' ❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. " A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Ipti ff, Name of Lead Agency - f iI _ Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer !I1 Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from responsible officer) C iV lyl Date PART 1—PROJECT INFORM;. ,ON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considerer as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additionh information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION site plan of Richard W. Corazzini LOCATION OF ACTION (Include street Address, Municipality and County) w s Cox Lane , Cutchogue , New York NAME OF APPLICANTISPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE Henry . Raynor , Sr . – Agent for Corazzini (516 ,98-8420 ADDRESS I 320 Love Lane CITY/PO STATE JP CODE 'Mattituck NY 11952 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE girhard W. Corazzini ( ) ADDRESS Inn Lupen Drive CITY/PO STATE JP CODE II NY 11935 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION construct office and equipment storage building C ( t Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: []Urban ]Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: 6 .9 acres. I APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COh1PLETlO^! Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 6 . 9 acres 6 -9 acres # Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? rnn coil and back run sand a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained _00 % of site ❑Moderately well drained °6 of site j ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres- (See 1 NYCRR 370). i 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? Dyes I2N0 a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 5. Approximate percentage of propl project site with slopes: ®0-10%x"''+0 % 010-15% % 015% or Biter % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? E3 Yes ENO"- l°'� I � '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? Dyes ®No B. What is the depth of the water table? + 90 (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? El Yes klNo 10_ Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Dyes ©No j 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? Dyes ONO According to Upon information and belief Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) Dyes ONO Describe I • 13. Is the project site presently used by the com�riunity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? - ❑Yes ONo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes ®No _k 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area none a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary i. 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name none b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? IIZYes ONO i a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? tUYes ❑No I b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ®Yes ❑No j 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 3041 ❑Yes ERNo 7 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article B of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ERNo g't 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? El Yes EiNo 4yj 11� B. Project Description - 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 6 . 9 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: 1' . 25 acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 5 . 6 5 acres. gJ d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) 9j e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; 'r 9 f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing _ n proposed 93 7 - g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 6 (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately 1 i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure oer eof aght; 60 width; 210 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? + 370 ft. q 3 'I I 2. How much natural material lam' rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from^e site? tons/cubic yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ]E7Yes ONO ❑NIA a. If yes, for what intender purpose is the site being reclaimed? plantings & grass b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ®Yes ❑No c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? g7Yes ONO 4. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 acres. 5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this Project? Dyes ONO 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1 9 months, (including demolition.). 7. If multi-phased: a- Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Dyes ONO 8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes KNO 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project n 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Dyes EkNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? Dyes EiNo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged ' 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes ONO Type I 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes ZNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ❑Yes INNo 1 -j 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes ONO a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons i b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ONO c. If yes, give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Dyes ONO e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? ❑Yes KlNo . . a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tonslmonth. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. .I 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Dyes ®No 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Dyes 13No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? Dyes ('lo 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? ®Yes ONO I If yes , indicate type(s) electricity 1 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallonslminute. per SCDOHS code I 23. Total anticipated water usage per day 27 a gallons/day. �r 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? ❑Yes ONO If Yes, explain 4 i 25. Approvals Required: . i' Submittal pe Cate City, Town, Village Board ❑Yes ❑No City, Town, Village Planning Board: )Eyes ❑No City, Town-Zoning Board ❑Yes []No City, County Health Department {t]Yes []No Other Local Agencies Dyes ONO Other Regional Agencies ElYes ONO SCnr Fo„i€w State Agencies Dyes ONO Federal Agencies ❑Yes ONO C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ®Yes ONO If Yes, indicate decision required: ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision Ipsite plan ❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning class ification(s)of the site? r r 3- What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? per code 4_ What is the proposed zoning of the site? LI 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? per —de C6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? 1❑Yes ONO 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a mile radius of proposed action? LI AND AC 8- Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a !, mile? ERYes ENO 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ONO 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? -f7Ye5 ONO a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? UYYes ONO 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ONO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ONO D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. j t jC! L/ g, R�ntlSpo sor Name � � �Date -,> / 43 �- \ Signature - `Z� - Title n I I If the action in�oaslal Area, akfd you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. 5 Part 2-'ROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR"AGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. T • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2_ The examples are generally applicable throughout the State acid for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) - a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 7 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large {Mitigated By Impact I Impact Project Change 1 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 _ • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet. Construction of paved parking. area for 1,000-or-.•-sore ehicles: ❑ ❑Yes 1- No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes_ ❑Na r 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ I ❑Yes ❑No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes No s • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t=. _.. y urs,que or unusual land forms found on the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO DYES • Specific land forms_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes F-1 No 6 14e moo _ 2 !' REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN. ELEMENTS & CERTIFICATION ;. SECTION-BLOCK-LOT TAX MAP NUMBERS NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER OF RECORD IINAME & ADDRESS OF PERSON PREPARING MAP +.1} DATE, NORTH POINT AND WRITTEN & GRAPHIC SCALE ,)DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY & INFORMATION TO DEFINE BOUNDARIES �k l/(LOCATIONS , NAMES & EXISTING WIDTHS OF ADJACENT STREETS & PURBS 1 LOCATION & OWNERS OF ALL ADJOINING LANDS , AS SHOWN ON TAX RECORDS Vit° " ! LOCATION & PURPOSE OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS Iii ; I —� COMPLETE OUTLINE OF EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS APPLYING TO PROPERTY E - �XISTING ZONING �I !AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOODING OR STORM WATER OVERFLOWS ! !WATER COURSES , MARSHES, WOODED AREAS, TREES 8" IN DIAMETER OR MORE Y. ' 'ANY BUILDING WITHIN 100 ' OF PROPERTY PAVED AREAS, SIDEWALKS, VEHICULAR ACCESS TO PUBLIC STREETS EXISTING SEWERS , CULVERTS , WATERLINES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO PROPERTY FENCING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING v PROPOSED BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURAL IDIPROVIDIENTS OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS " JAN 2 2 N M OUTDOOR LIGHTING OR PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS '"" �E 3 OUTDOOR SIGNS- ..: 239K IGNS.. 23°K SIDEWALKS LOCATIONS WIDTHS : SIZE OF WATER AND SEWER LINES ✓o rf � �et r ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Drawings submitter, dated,April 4, 1996, are approved by the committee, as noted below: 1. Color of vinyl signs to be tan, as per sample. 2. Color of stucco finish to match vinyl signs. 3. Doors to match Terratone color of Anderson windows. Overhead doors to match Terratone color of Anderson. 4. Aluminum trim to be brown as per sample submitted. 5. Maintain roof penetrations on same side of building and as shown { on the drawing. We extend thanks to applicant for responding to the ARC questions as thoroughly as they have. Garrett Strang Chairman i ------__--__ �Y-"---'fid_,:_ -.t_.$_____�✓�_/L� :`.�-/�=_��i�2_�;�!'7's��___.1�--�_/�-_ f� Li flit 711!1.. i f / __ --. �_��C_�i�/I —L_f��✓t``C S ZO �}C�G L�/ %��=S�Jr/v S _ I' y% 5 s- a i" x'. $i a<. HENRY E. RAYNOR PO BOX 1459 320 LOVE LANE MATTITUCK, N-Y_ 1.1952 516-298-8420 516-298 2127 (FAY) MARCH 18, 1996 TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PUANNTNG BOARD MAIpr. ROAD SOUTFOLD. N.Y. 11971 RE: CORA7MNI SITE PLAN ENCLOSED HEREWITH ARE COPIES OF THE REVISED SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING IN CUTCHOGUE. THESE NAVE BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT THE INPUT OF THE ARCH. REVIEW COMM_ WE ARE AWAITING RESTAMPING OF THIS SITE PLAN, AND WILL RETURN SAME AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 7'1 Y HENRY E. RAYNOR PO BOR 1459 320 LOVE LANE } MATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 516-248-8420 516-298 2127 (FAX) f ' FEB. 8. 1996 IE - t TO: SOUTHOLD TOWN PLANNING BOARD RE: CORAZZINI ISTE PLAN ENCLOSED HEREWITH ARE THE SPECIFICS REQUSET FOR ARCH. REV. BOARD. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. THANK YOU. FEB 81996 r t � ;� n PLANNIING BOARD MEMBERS y S F Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G_WARD ti Chairman P.O.Box 1179 l Southold. New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. y J Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. y„ �ti 'f WILLIAM J.CREMERS Telephone (516) 765-1938 _ KENNETH L.EDWARDS r PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD a S January 30, 1996 Henry Raynor P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM# 1000-84-1-26.2 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, January 29, 1996: BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, do an uncoordinated review of this unlisted action. The Planning Board establishes itself as lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance and grants a Negative Declaration. The final public hearing which was held over from December 11, 1995, was closed. The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, Richard W. Corazzini is the owner of the property known and designated as proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini, located at Cox's Lane in Cutchogue, SCTM# 1000-84-1-26.2; and WHEREAS, a formal application for the approval of this site plan was submitted on July 8, 1993; and Page 2 Proposed site plan for Richard W_ Corazzini January 30, 1996 WHEREAS, the Southold Town Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, (Article 8), Part 617, declared itself lead agency and issued a Negative Declaration on January 29, 1996; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of the Site Plan Regulations of the Town of Southold have been met; be it therefore RESOLVED, that the Southold Town Planning Board grant conditional final approval on the surveys dated January 5, 1996 and authorize the Chairman to endorse the surveys subject to fulfillment of the following conditions. All conditions must be met within six (6) months of the date of this resolution: 1. Certification by the Senior Building Inspector. 2. Review by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services. 3. Review by the Architectural Review Committee. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above_ rely/, 4ind4hVG47 a Chairman cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector enc. t PLANNI14G BOARD'MEMB SU�1 Town Ball, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD Chairman iy F� y Q P.O.Box 1179 iJ o= 4 Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. '.v .y. n9 WILLIAM J_CREMERS V O C�,iy Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L_EDWARDS PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant January 29, 9996 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Hoard, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM#: 1000-84-1-26.2 Location: Cox Lane, Cutchogue SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No ( X ) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for a 25,200 square foot office, storage and repair building an a 6.910 site located on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. Page 2 SEQR Negative Declaration - Richard W. Corazzini January 29, 1996 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The project involves a change to the original negative declaration issued on September 13, 1993_ The revision involves the construction of a 25,200 square foot office, storage and repair building on a 6.910 acre vacant lot on Cox Lane. in Cutchogue. The use is a permitted use in this Light Industrial zone (LI), therefore the project meets current zoning. There has not been any correspondence received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in the allotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there are no comments or objections from that agency. The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems. Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS). This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits_ For Further Information: Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address: Planning Board Telephone Number: (516) 765-1938 cc: Michael D. Zagata, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. of Health Suffolk County Water Authority Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant s�K i Submission Without ra`Cover:-Letter d I� ` Sender: 1kk�CbnIG -'�S'U rvehors I I 7 Subject: i�I Chard Ca razz i n,' i SCT.'M: 1000- Comments: revised prints JAN 1 01996 I" LL : i tom` PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G.WARD - ti'��%� Q Town Hall, 53095 Main Road h� G?� P.O. Box 1179 Chairman oSouthold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAbI,.JR. W 2 Fax(516) 765-3136 BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. _ - WILLIAM J_CREMERS CP ® Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS 4 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE 0 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD t TO: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman RE: Richard W. Corazzini I Cox' s Lane, Cutchogue j. SCTM# 1000-84-1-26 . 2 DATE : January 10, 1996 Please review the attached for certification. Attachments PLANNING BOARD MEMBEC Town Hall, 53095 blain Road Rlcuaun G.wARD Chairman P.O. Box 1179 o Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCIIE LATHAhf,JR. j BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. " �y Fax(516) 765-3136 WILLIAM J. CREMERS ® ; Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDW_ARDS _ j PLANNING BOARD OFFICE I{ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD f 1 jJanuary 3, 1996 Henry Raynor P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM41000-84-1-26. 2 Dear Mr. Raynor, As discussed at the January 3, 1996, meeting with the Planning Board, the following changes/additions must be made to the site plan before the Board can proceed with its review: 1. Elevation drawings showing materials and colors. 2. Building cannot be more than sixty feet facing the street. 3. Indicate extent of lower level. 4_ Dry wells not connected to building. 5. Review turn radius for large trucks. 6. Three handicapped spaces required. 7. Show location of any outdoor sign. 8. Show areas to be planted with grass. In addition to the above the elevation drawings will be reviewed with the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) . A copy of the revised plan should be sent to the Suffolk County Department of Health Services for their review. A letter from SCDHS ora updated stamp on the plan will be required. The completed plan will have to be re-certified by the Building Department. i } If you have any questions, or require additional information, please } contact this office. i inc rety, 1 /� lz-c ( l h T Kassner II Site Plan Reviewer i cc: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building inspector John Metzger, Peconic Surveyors, P.C. Southold Town 'Planning,Board 3 December 11, 1995 andors he final surveys subject tofulfillment of following condition. All conditions ust be met within six (6) month the date of this resolution. 1. Submission o e park and pla ound fee in the amount of $2,000.00 ($2,000.00 per v ant lot). Mr. Cremers: Second Mr. Ward: Mo d and seconde All in favor? Ayes: Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. ards, Mr_ Cremers, Mr. Ward. r. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried_ Mr. Ward: 7:35 p-m. Richard Corazzini - This site plan is or a 12,600 square foot office, storage and repair building on a 6.910 acre site located on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. SCTM# 1000-84-1-26.2. 1 see the agent for the applicant is here. Would you like to address the Board? Henry Raynor. . Good evening. Happy holidays to everyone_ My name is Henry Raynor and I'm representing Richard Corazzini. The proposed site plan before you was started before this Board in 1992. It's comprised of 66.9 acres of Light Industrial zoned property and the plan is revised and submitted, it has probably just come back to the Board with this new revision. Before you we believe is in conformance with Section 100-250-256 of the Town code. The front yard setback is aligned with the adjacent parcel to the south, Mr. Grey, which is approximately 75 feet back from Cox Lane in Cutchogue. We request for the approval of the site pian this evening. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them concerning this particular project. Perhaps after the formal part of this hearing I might have a suggestion with regard to some of the new amendments under 100-133C, for the Board. Mr. Ward: Alright. The Board tonight will probably put a motion on to hold this hearing open until January 8 to get our SEQRA coordinated here. We have a site plan that was filled out with a long form which really doesn't coordinate with what's really on paper at this time. We'd like to do a coordinated review with amended plan so that would give us a little time to send it out to the agencies and hopefully on the 8th we could close and approve. 1 L} 9 { Southold Town Planning Board 4 December 11, 1995 Mr. Raynor: Basically, it's just the orientation of the building to the conformance of the new section and ordinance. I Mr. Ward: If that was it we would go with it, but we're looking at a 12,000 square foot presentation now. It's up to over 20,000 square foot of building, so, in any case, I don't think it's a major thing, but... } Ms. Scopaz: We can do an uncoordinated review, since there were no 9 objections the first time around. Mr. Ward: Valerie says we can do an uncoordinated review... Ms. Scopaz: It's a shorter time span. Mr. Ward: So, at this point then, I'd like to offer the following motion to hold the hearing open until the January 8 Planning Board meeting, to revise and review the SEQRA to conform to the latest proposed plan. Mr. Orlowski: Second. Mr. Ward: Motion and seconded. All in favor? Ayes: Mr. Orlowski, Mr. Latham, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward. Mr. Ward: Opposed? Motion carried. Mr. Latham: Henry, let me ask you, what are you going to do with this building? Mr. Raynor: The applicant primarily is building this because presently he's renting space from Jim Grey to store his equipment and trucks and his maintenance and repair. The remainder of the building, as he has indicated to me, is for storage. From there on, if there is going to be a change of use, we're going to have to come back before the Board. I would like to make a comment to the Board. I find that the amendment that was adopted in August by the Town Board, 100-133C, becomes something of a problem in that the linear footage of a building fronting on a street being held to 60 feet, given the LI district zoning requirements, the lot width being 100 feet, I can readily understand this. But we have several parcels I can think of just off the cuff, that are 300 or 400 feet in width. To restrict a 60 foot building on a 400 or 300 foot wide parcel of property is going to add to some confusion and Southold Town Planning'Board 5 December 11, 1995 l you're going to end up with something similar to Dune Road in some of the i building configurations_ I would make a suggestion, and the Board may want to pass it on to the Zoning Committee and the Town Board, that the 60 feet set as a minimum in the LI with a 100 foot lot width, is very definitive. There is no problem with that. But, there probably should establish a ratio in proportion to J the linear footage of the road, that being the ratio of the linear footage of the road to the building. And if you wanted to keep a 6 to 10 ratio or something of that nature, that again would be very acceptable. But we're going to end up With buildings especially those that front on two streets;_ with something of -rather odd shapes. l thank you far hearing my comments. I wish you all a ! Merry Christmas. 1 MAJ R AND MINOR SUBDIVISIONS, LOT LINE CHANGES AND SET OFF APPLI ATIONS / i Final Det minations: i Mr. Ward: N o Real - This minor subdivision is fr 2 lots on 4.445 acres in ! Cutchogue. S TM# 1000-97-3-11.2, 4, 5, 6 & j/What's the pleasure of the Board? / Mr. Cremers: Mr. C irman, I'd like tonneke the following resolution_ BE IT RESOLVED that the S thold Town P nning Board authorize the Chairman to endorse the final surveys ated Ma 10, 1995. Conditional final approval was granted on November 13, 95_ AfIl conditions have been fulfilled. Mr./Wardn Second the m i n. Mr. on ands onded. in favor? Ayeski, r. Latham, Mr. E ards, Mr. Cremers, Mr. Ward. Mr. ed? Motion carried. (Chair an endorsed surveys) Prensions:Mr. erry Estates - This major subdivision is fo 18 lots on 50.0171 acres located on the west side of Laurel Ave., 140 feet sout of Yennecott .,, t tiOTI Ecttit,. ch: STATE OF NEW YORK) NaUcs uf: ublic.Hrv�tnb , I } $S' III III II ill ,:u{I NOTICE 1S4EREB:Y G1VENlCzat COUNTY OF SUFFOLK II II ;I'Idhl I " pursuant to'se ii 276 of the Town q0Iu IIII9 h gU kj;Law,a public hearing will be fieldby dlllllldl 'II"II II VIII I u"I II I iI the Southold Town Planning Board,at 11'11 IIII I II IIIIIII NIII'�,IiIIU'I'll ��rl the Town Hall;Main Road, Southold, -- of Mattituck, ii qqII a l I;'ll l l 11 III 41111 i�rIN New York to said Town on the l lth day _ in said.County,being duly sworn, Ays that he/she is Ilil li VIII II II Ili VIII m 'I of December;,1995 on the question of IIIpuIllrhullNNrhlu I Iolll Ipl�,, Principal Clerk of THE SUFFOLK TIMES a Weekly mluluvlmu,oIIIIuI 10 I," thefollowing: IIIIII�IIII;@�II�IIIIIIk'IIIIIIIIIjIIIIuIo;Illl �IIIII 6Ib INewspaper,7.35 P M.Public hearing for the pro News er, P a ublished at Mattituck, In the Town of I'! osed site Ian for Richard W. hI�III�IU'11611iILRII I�IMIII HILI III p 1' Southold County of Suffolk and State of New York, VIII IIIIIII IfIP III'Il IN111119(IIII III III Ilhlll Jf II COraZZIR7, !R CuLChOaLLe, Town of lilllIIIILIIIIpQ Ldl!1��111191NIIItl IIIIIII V NI I IW X411, u,dIlH�rll�111161141 hlgllulllhll'IIiI"I III w Southold, Count of Suffolk, State of and that the Notice of which the annexed is a llldllglpllli,Ilmpinl�INllullgo o I'dI 11 New York Suffolk CountyTaxl Map been regularly ulllulhlu4plli IVIIIIIIiNIIlI1tlull�illllhlulllu u!Iih IIII II6printed copy, has b ' published in said �mlgdllll�qulluullllll I 19y1;,Number 1000-84-1 ,6.2.:. PNIhINIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIhIlIN911IIlIIullllll;l g'i'I III "1!1 The property is bordered on Lite{{hh p Pe y Newspaper once each week for weeks IIQIiIIII�IiIIIII�hIiIQII�IhIIlglllllllo II i1;Il` north by Cox's.Lane; on,the east by 41 rul mmmlmu a ull uu Il lr III I land now or formerly of�Pudge Corp: 8u%Ively, Comm On the day Of IV61Iii16illhlu4illlirdlil'IIIIIIIiiliiiliiiiilli iilo4 IIII 911719ii'+ y N IIII��pp �IIryry h ppIIII II II II III VI II �I on the south by land now or forme rl of 19 IIIUIIIIIIII I�Ullllllll!IIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII IIII IoI IIID hTown of Southold;and on the west by !1II119111III'191'll'llJllllllll.Il ulowl lapd'now or formerly of Towin of UIIIII'!IIIIIII II�@II IIIV U� Ild P II' I Ipll�iu IIVIIryI N.i II uII�IIIVuuu u;ul sl a Nal, Southold e r ill IrIINf1119I1 IyIlllll 11111191 IU"III II III IVuII Iu a ul 11 r 28 1995 VIII WI Dated TVovembz E CHRIGMNA VOUNSKi IIY�I I hI E OF wN IIIIIII I VIII I IIIIII BY ORD PIV I SOUTHOI D TO NJpry PUblic.State of N9W 1bcR �I IIIIII I VIII I IIIV I I J II VII III III oll 4ls llll ll4"IIII PC NN� � ''RD 11 ull III IIIIII m p l ikl iichatd G Ward No8� Principal Clerk i�i��llu Im�I�lqu Illlnllll NI III ow.NII KI Cha.rmaR. QU@lif6d in Suffolk Count II IIIIIIIIIryryIIUIIIIIII 9 llhlhllllllli 6P I o r�ly�l1 I I I II�Yon o II II II I I I III IIII u l m u l rm l Cotttmisaian�1[@¢iNOH@ipt� r ,1 N;IIIII Iry� I, UII IIIIII IIh II IIII 1Iq h ddlfl,' ,IIu 8570,1 TN30 JJJ 41 i;III IK111 41 1 y 111'1 1911111 Uh U IIPII V I I I h 11411111 �� -- �- �•� ahm INI II II I III II U II i' d' u,t Il,lllhINIII III hN.III,III�JU61V11II!II Jn I h, •� � � "I II mu III ul a ul i a Notary Public (IIII III(IIIIIII(IIII II Itlllllllrillllllrl III VIII I Irl I � �'l� r "IIIIIIhIIIIIIIIIII�IpIIIIuI�IIIIIII II —a k DEC 6 L95 ; 'll II III II III(IIII III'tl.pl II I c- � ' N III�II'll�I I'.I.IIu IIII I I�, � P:, y lllyIIIIIIIyI ll,ll Sworn efore me this I14IVd��mIIIIII141lg1,h d a 3 day of IIII 'III I II IIIV I -- _.x_ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS RICHARD G.WARD �l®� Co�,-, Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Chairman �h� i P.O. Box 1179 C3 1 Fax(5161 765-3136 6 Southold, New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. W WILLIAM.J.CREMERS � ® �;� Telephone(516) 765-1935 KENNETH L.EDWARDS yij�o �01 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD December 12, 1995 Henry Raynor P.O. Box 1459 Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM# 1000-84-1-26.2 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following took place at a meeting of the Southold Town Planning Board on Monday, December 11, 1995: The final public hearing which was opened at 7:35 p.m. was held open until the applicant submits a corrected site plan_ Please contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. rely ' f}t "c '(d Chairman �211 PLANNING BOARD MEMRI Y-® - ,,C/��/' ,�. Town Hall, 53095 Main Road RICHARD G.WARD P.O. Box 1179 Chairman o Southold,New York 11971 GEORGE RITCHIE LATHAM,JR. H BENNETT ORLOWSKI,JR. Fax(516) 765-3136 WILLIAMJ-CREMERS ® Telephone (516) 765-1938 KENNETH L.EDWARDS ,O, PLANNING BOARD OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: Thomas Fisher, Senior Building Inspector FROM: Richard G. Ward, Chairman . RE : Richard W. Corazzini Cox' s Lane, Cutchogue SCTM# 1000-84-1-26 . 2 DATE: December 1, 1995 Please review the attached for certification. Attachments : - -- - ---- --- _ - --fir _ _ i HENRY E. RAYMOR FO BOX i459 220 LOVE LAKE NATTITUCK, N.Y. 11952 516-298-8420 516-258 2127 (FAX; i NOV. 21, 1935 i YO: SeUTVOLD `SOWN pLAHMINr BOARD I RE: RICHARD C-CR AZZINI SITE PLAN 1000-84-01-2 .2 ENCLOSED HERWITH ARE 6 FINAL COPIES OF THE 9B'OVE CAPTIONED SITE PLA& li 'HESE ARE AFFIXED WITH SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPT. C7 __nL___ SERVICES STAMP OF A;PRCVAL. PLEASE REVIEW AND SE_ . OR FINAL DETERMINATION' AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY OUE'--i;NS PEASE CALL ME AT THE ABOVE T:i BER. M L.Ar S ARE AT PECONIC SlJa'd;=`_OR1 S OFFICE AND .,AH BE DELIVERED O THE ECARD ON ONE DAYS NOTICE. i YOURS Y'ROL., Ia Ei_R Kr. i^°1.3 AGENT FOR RICHARD CjRA-7'7-gKi Us NOV 2 11995 E y LAI q CFO(;ir�� ii FL. JACOBS car+ A JAMS A. RICTI r=ENT OF Q ENGINEERING S ��o! ��0� LYSPECTOR " > ,0 705-3010 # OFFICE OF TEE E`IGIYEER 3 TOWN OF SO=CLD I jf NOVEMBER 4, 1593 t. shard G. Ward lairma^ - Planning Board �wxi Hall , 53095 Dain Road buthold, New York 11971 e: Richard W. Corazzini Site Pian Cox La_ie, C'utchogue New York SC"H. 1000 - 34 - 01 - 26. 2 1 f I Dear 3_r . {,yard: As per your request, I have reviewed the Proposed drainage SCY t,`.e ab:%o r= referenced Si:.e plan. The drainage Cal-culations ; that have been provided are sulfiCient and the subsequent leaching pool System aeSign iS adequate to handle the s-riace grater rurioff that will be generated from the proposed e d e 1 Cpmer_t. _f VoueTaC:F an r' CiiestlCn S concernina thls review; please -lonLac-I --fay ££ iCe- -ncpre'' v, amen A. Richter , R. H. • r� PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS - J - SCOTT L- HARRIS Bennett Orlowski. Jr., Chahman - '- Supervisor _"!."dam George Ritchie Latham- Jr. f- Richard G. Ward = Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold. New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 James Richter, Road Inspector Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Mr. Richter: The Southold Town Planning Board hereby refers -the following application for your review. Application Name: Q6_Q6sed Sl r—.4PlArlyd/j pleg l? D W, 4 OW zzlH/ Tax Map No. : 0100 r{- / _ i. .7, Street Location: _ ��n ` �� r KTG H 0G /7�'- Hamlet Location: [ u 7G'ff�GvE Type of Application: Sketch Subdivision Map (Dated Preliminary Subdivision Map (Dated Final Subdivision Map (Dated _ Road Profiles (Dated �( Grading and Drainaqe Plans (Dated Other ( Dated Sketch Site Plan (Dated Preliminary Site Plan (Dated Grading and Drainaqe Plans (Dated Other (Dated Comments: Contact Person ------------------ f =e f CUTCHOGUE FIRE DISTRICT r : New Suffolk Road, PO Box 930, Cutchogue, NY 11935 Telephone (516) 734-6907 • Fax (516) 734-7079 October 7, 1993 ' Mr. Richard Ward, Chairman Southold Town planning 8d_ Town Hall Southold, N-Y_ 11971 Ref. Richard Corazzini Dear Mr. Ward, Reference the above property and map. It is the opinion of the Board that a well is not required at this time. If there are any changes, please advise. Yours truly, J Board off Fire /Commissioners Matthew J_ Martin Secretary 12 wv .4iiJ} V r, �ate• � '�' k '.PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS , W a Supervisor Richard G.Waw.Chairman �` g -' as , George Ritchie.Latham,Jr. -4 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowski,Jr- Ks, P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Southold,New York 11971 'SN-gk Kenneth L. Edwards ` r } Telephone(516)765-1996 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 4 3 September 14, 1993 Henry Raynor AV 320 Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini SCTM# 1000-84-1-26 . 2 Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was adopted by the Southold Town Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, September 13 , 1993 : BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental Quality Review Act, assumes lead agency, and as lead agency makes a determination of non-significance, and grants a Negative Declaration. Enclosed please find a copy of the Negative Declaration for your records. Sincerely, icTiard G. Ward Chairman -- enc. 'r y c NN, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS 4 z; SCOTT L. HARRIS Supervisor . .. Richard G. Ward, Chalanan e � George Ritchie Latham.Jr. Town Hall,53095 Main Road Bennett Orlowsld,Jr_ '" -„"'� P. O.Box 1179 .Mark S.McDonald Southold, New York 11971 Kenneth L. Edwards Telephone(516)765-1938 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax 1516)765- 1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination Non-Significant September 13 , 1993 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Law. The Southold Town Planning Board, as lead agency, has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared. Name of Action: Proposed site plan for 'E Richard W. Corazzini SCTt'1n : 1000-84-1-26 . 2 Location: Cox Lane, Cutchogue SEAR Status: Type I ( ) Unlisted ( X ) Conditioned Negative Declaration: Yes ( ) No ( X ) Description of Action: This proposed site plan is for a 12, 600 square foot office, storage and repair building on a 6 . 910 acre site located on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. Page 2 SEQRA Negative Declaration - Richard W. Corazzini September 13 , 1993 Reasons Supporting This Determination: The project involves the construction of a 12,600 square foot office, storage and repair building on a 6.910 acre vacant lot on Cox Lane in Cutchogue. The use is a per- mitted se. in this Light Industrial zone (LI) , therefore the project meets current zoning. There has not been any correspondence received from the 5 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 4 in theallotted time. Therefore, it is assumed that there s are no comments or objections from that agency. s The applicant will have to comply with the requirements of +7 the Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) and all relevant standards of water supply and sewage disposal systems . r Design and flow specification, subsurface soil conditions, and site plan details will have to be approved by the Suffolk County Department of Health Services (SCDHS ) . This impact is not considered significant due to the anticipated project compliance with established requirements of the SCSC and the SCDHS and the required relevant permits. For Further Information: j Contact Person: Robert G. Kassner Address : Planning Board Telephone Number: ( 516 ) 765-1938 CC: Thomas Jorling, DEC Albany Suffolk County Dept. Health Services Judith Terry, Town Clerk Southold Town Building Dept. Applicant �..✓ �u3�rcE COUNTY OF SUFFOLK (9 ROBERT J. GAFFNEY SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MARY E. HIBBERD, M-D., M.P.H. COMMISSIONER September 13, 1993 Robert G.Kassner Town of Southold t r fi n t Town Hall-53095 Main Road g! fi P,0.Box 1174 i Southold,New York 111,371 SEP I T g RE: *illiam'W.Corazzint .- 6 ` SCTM(#t 1000-34-1-26.2 .;`L'�H_.' T:3s,11 ! Dear Nlr.K-assner: The Suffolk County Department of Health Services(SCDHS)has received your letter dated August 10, 1993, concendrig,the above-referenced application,and has no objection to the Town's designation as lead agency. This correspondence is intended primarily to expedite the procedural requirements of SEQRA pertaining to the establishment of lead agency.The comments provided below are,therefore,general in nature,representing several of our most common concerns regarding Suffolk County projects.The department wishes,however, to reserve its right to provide more detailed information within the comment period(s)established for this action. I. Suffolk County Sanitary Code (SCSC) 1. The SCDHS maintains jurisdiction over the final location of sewage disposal and water supply systems,pursuant to the authority and requirements of Articles 4, 5,6 and 7 of the SCSC" Applications must comply with all relevant density and construction standards for water supply and sewage disposal Applicants should not undertake the construction of, or connection to,either system without Health Department approval- I Where applicable,the department regulates the storage,handling and discharge of restricted toxic and hazardous materials pursuant to the requirements 4 Articles 7&12 of the SCSC. - 3- If an application has not yet been submited to the SCDHS,one should be filed at the earliest date to allow for the technical review of the proposed action.f Project designs submitted to the department should be fully consistent with any action currently under review through the SEQRA process. 4. Design and flow specifications,information regarding subsurface sod conditions.water supply information,and complete design details are essential to the review of this project,and are evaluated fully at the time of application review.Should the town require additional environmental information(such as a DEIS),discussion of the compliance requirements of the SCDHS should be required. 5. Of particular concern to the department are those areas which because of elevated groundwater conditions,or soils which are not conducive to the proper functioning of conventional subsurface sanitary sewage disposal systems.Your agency should be aware that such conditions frequently require the useoffill or-the excavation of subsurface soils to accommodate subsurface sanitary disposal systems constructed in conformance with the requirements of the SCSC. DIVI510N OF ENVIRONMENTAL OIIALT' COUNTY CENTER RIVERHEAD, N.Y. 11901-3397 B52-21 DO - - y Letter to Robert G. Kass;.' September 13, 1993 Page 2 6. The department is also significantly concerned with areas where access to potable water may be constrained by unacceptable groundwater quality and the lack of an available public water supply_All private water supply systems must be constructed in conformance with requirements of the SCSC. H. NATURAL RESOURCES: 1- The SCDHS fully supports all efforts to maximize protection of natural resources which may be impacted upon by construction and development activities.It is the position of the department that the SEQRA review process provides the greatest opportunity for comprehensive consideration of these resources,and that all practicable planning measures should be employedto help ensure their protection. Of particular concem,to department is the adequate protection of wetlands,surface waters,natural communities, contiguous natural habitats,and rare,threatened and endangered species.In addition,efforts to protect sensitive physical resources such grouudivaters,dunes,blufrs,shorelines,natural drainage channels,groundwater recharge areas,and steepslopes:are frilly supported and encouraged by the SCDHS" In general,the department encourages the following land use measures be considered(where appropriate)to actions being reviewed,pursuant to SEQRA- 1.Maximum practicable setbacks from all wetlands,surface waters,dunes,and bluffs" 2.Non-disturbance buffers between wetland limits and required structural setbacks. 3_Clustering of subdivision lots to provide for maximum preservation of large contiguous areas of dedicated open space. 4.Stringent clearing limitations which can reduce potential impacts to wildlife habitats,vegetative communities,and unconsolidated soils. 5.Maximum practicable confinement of development to areas with slopes of less than 10%- 6.Maximum use of native species for landscaping purposes. 7" Construction of recbarge areas,so as to minimize the amount of disturbance and structural modification to the site_ 8_Maximum use of land-banked parking on commercial sites" 9.Minimal use of fertilizer-dependant turf and landscaping. 10.Employment of stommwater runoff control measures necessary to maintain nmoff on-site. i` The department appreciates the opportunity to participate in the SEQRA review of this proposal"Additional information may be provided prior to the close of the established comment period.Should you have any questions or require additional information,please feel free to contact the Office of Ecology at 852-2078. I Sincerely, Kimberly Shaw Sr"Environmental Analyst r Office of Ecology E KS/amf cc: Vito Miner, P.E. y, Stephen Costa,PE" I � t � PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS SCOTT L. HARRIS Bennett Orlowski, Jr.. Chairman * �s" .� -�'=' `� Supervisor Georaoe Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, Box Road Mark S. McDonald `s ' P.O. Box 1179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New Yorrkk 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE _ Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 /z. . . ?_s fey 1993 Mathew Martin, Secretary Cutchogue Fire District New Suffolk Lane Cutchogue, New York 11935 Dear Mr. Martin: d / closed please find (2 ) surveys /moi / . baa Please notify this office as to ether any fire wells are needed. Please specify whether shallow wells or electric wells will be needed. Please reply by X199, . Thank you for your cooperation. V y r ly you ire enc. 2 PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS fi s SCOTT L. HARRIS ,�. _ Supervisor Richard G.Ward.chairman George Ritchie latham•Jr. p&W '- .�'"� • Town Hall, 53095 Main Road BennetGOrlowskl.Jr. �'-a P.O. Box 1179 Mark S.McDonaldSouthold, New York 11971 ' °- Kenneth L. Edwards PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Fax 15161 765- 1823 Telephone(516)765-1938 . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD wt ;7 August 10, 1993 qy, ' Henry Raynor r, 320 Love Lane ` Mattituck, NY 11952 Re: Proposed site plan for Richard W. Corazzini Cox Lane, Cutchogue :z :•. �7:-•.,a SCTM# 1000-84-1-26 . 2 "a-- Dear Mr. Raynor: The following resolution was duly adopted by the Southold Town `.Planning Board at a meeting held on Monday, August 9, 1993; BE IT RESOLVED that the Southold Town Planning Board, acting under the State Environmental_•=;'_' Quality Review Act, start the coordination process on this unlisted action. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the above. Sincergly, c r✓ Ward - 6 Chairman _ - S ,C� ayy�1•f�'i. 40, PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS ° SCOTT L. HARRIS •.. < .'! - Bennett Orlowski, Jr., Chairman Supervisor q ��. '- - - ��.��.' George Ritchie Latham, Jr. `=y. aTv Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Richard G. Ward P.O. Box 1179 Mark S. McDonald Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone 1516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD y— Fax (516) 765-1823 19 f RE: Lead Agency Coordination Request Dear Reviewer: The purpose of this request is to determine under Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act-SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 the following: 1. Your jurisdiction in the action described below; 2 . Your interest in assuming the responsibilities of lead agency; and 3 . Issues of concern which you believe should be evaluated. Enclosed please find a copy of the proposal and a completed Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) to assist you in your response. Project Name: t / P lio, � !� Requested Action: / / / ,/1 cC i 2, �o e �yliv�arG SEQRA Classification: ( ) Type I �(7'X ) Unlisted Contact Person: ( 516) -765-1938 The lead agency will determine the need for an envifonmental /// impact statement (EIS) on this project. Within thirty ( 30) days of the date of this letter, please respond in writing whether -or-not you have an interest in being lead agency. Planning Board Position: ( X} This agency wishes to assume lead agency status for this action. ( ) This agency has no objection to your agency assuming lead agency status for this action. ( ) Other. ( See comments below) . Comments: Please feel free to contact this office for further information. '__91�ce ely, i Chairman cc: �rustees-- } Building' Department Southold Town Board Suffolk County Dept. of Health Services N-YS�Sto ny-Broo-k^ UYSDEC - Albany STS,--H�gt—a�'�u-hl3 US Arm�rr�€-EngiTre-G-r-s— arrs gcrr t a t on * Maps are enclosed for your review Coordinating agencies E Q / SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER DATE: o b I 7 SENDER: PcconiL S(. (vcyors SUBJECT: � I CFIQYG�" Co raz-2-i n , SCTM# : COMMENTS: �Q pQ� P ri n ►� — ( rro-, Proposed btc,i!d I €��_�'a •. .'n is _�_ PLANNING BOARD MEMBERSrn h ;� , � �' SCOTT L. HARRIS Benner Orlowski_ Jr., Chairman a� ^�-,`" y� f. Supervisor George Ritchie Latham, Jr. Richard G. Ward Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Mark S. McDonald P.O. Box I179 Kenneth L. Edwards Southold, New York 11971 PLANNING BOARD OFFICE Telephone (516) 765-1938 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Fax (516) 765-1823 July`23 , 1993 Henry E. Raynor 320. Love Lane Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed Site Plan for Richard W. Corazzini Cox Lane, Cutchogue Zoning District: Light Industrial (LI) SCTM# 1000-84-1-26 . 2 Dear Mr. Raynor: ' The Planning Board has received your letter of July 8, 1993 , regarding the above referenced project. The following changes/additions must be made before the Board can proceed with its review: 1 . A 25 ' front yard landscaped strip. 2 . A 22 ' back up area between the front parking area and the landscaping in front of the building. 3 . Curbing or car stops must be placed between the parking spaces and the grass area. 4. Elevation drawings. 5 . A landscaping plan. A 4 ' landscaped strip is required along the perimeter of the parking area. In addition there must be ten (10) square j feet of interior landscaping within the paved ,portion of the parking area for each parking space and at least one tree for every (10) parking spaces or fraction thereof. 7. A lighting plan. 8. A sketch of any outdoor signs. i In addition to the above a review should be made of the locations of neighboring well sites in relation to the septic system. Consideration should also be given to an interior flow of traffic with the property to the south. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please contact this office. i cer 1 , lexa � L ichard J . Ward Chairman CC: Thomas Fisher, Building Inspector s i I i a r I i I SUBMISSION WITHOUT COVER LETTER t l / G DATE: Il n �-t� SENDER: �Nh 'L2 y SUBJECT: � e 2,�y f ��` �e��/�' CS SCTM# : Z, COMMENTS: T I?�S. 0o — site plan app4 - �I JUL l• �{ at _� Ir �g° r (] fi8 r( 29y3, 2 1 Y {''J.1Ti.ieU uvY9'.0 LASER FICHE FORM Planning Board Site Plans and Amended Site i SPPile Type: Approved Proiect Type: Site Plans Status: Final Approval ' SCTM # : 1000 - 84-1-26.2 Project Name: Corazzini, Robert -Address: Cox's. Lane ;t Hamlet.. Cutchoque Applicant Niru~. Richard Corazzini Owner Name;_ Robert Corazzini Zone 1: LI H Approval bate: 4/8/1996 OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A date indicates that we have received the related information End SP Date: 4/8/1996 Zone 2: Zone 3: Location: located on the south side of Cox's lane approximately 370' west of G Middle Road li SC Filing Date: Cand R's : Home Assoc: R and M Agreement: SCAN Date: 266#ASPHALT ROOFING SHINGLES ANDERSEN COMMERCIAL CLAD WINDOWS (COLOR TO BE SLATE BLEND) (TYP.) - ❑ ❑ ❑ - - ❑ m ❑ m ❑ ❑ � ❑ mm ❑ - ❑ -m ❑ ❑' ❑ m ❑ ® ® FER STUCCO EXTERIOR FINISH (COLOR TO BE WHITE) STEEL OVERHEAD DOORS BY RAYNOR OR EQUAL VIEW FROM THE SOUTH --- - - - -- - ---------- - f ❑ ❑ m m c❑ _ - D ❑ ❑ ❑ V STEEL ENTRY DOORS BY BENCHMARK OR EQUAL_' I -- ------- --- - -- VIEW FROM THE NORTH i - - VIEWS OF PROPOSED BUILDING VINYL SIDING RICHARD W. CORAZZ/NI — (COLOR TO BE SLATE) _ - - - A T CUTCHOGUE, N Y Scale: I" = 10' Aug. 5, 1993 _ -- ---- ----- -- - - - _�T - - - -' Feb. 3, 1994 (revisions) Feb. 8, 1994 (View from Wesi) ❑ ID ❑ m ❑ oma m - - I � � Feb.6,1996(revisions) I ) VIEW FROM THE WEST VIEW FROM THE EAST — - - FEB 81996 i PECONIC SURVEYORS, P.C. (516) 765 -'5020 P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 MORTON BUILDINGS GENERAL SPEO9F" IOATDONS AMINAT D COI IJMNG - NO 1 OR BETTER SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE NAIL LAMINATED 3 MEMBER S4S COLUMNS USED IN MORTON BUILDINGS ARE PRESSURE TREATED BELOW GRADE TO A RETENTION OF 8 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT WITH CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE TYPE III, OXIDE TYPE, AS LISTED IN FEDERAL SPECIFICATION TT-W-571J THE TREATED PORTION OF THE COLUMN EMBEDDED IN GROUND SHALL BE LAMINATED WITH STAINLESS STEEL NAILS. FOOTINGS AND ANCHORAGE - COLUMN HOLES ARE DUG 4 FEET DEEP MIN. DEPTH BELOW GRADE AND READY-MIX CONCRETE PADS OR DRY CONCRETE MIX PADS ARE POURED IN PLACE (NOTE PLANS FOR SIZE & TYPE). TWO GALVANIZED STEEL BASE ANCHORS ARE PLACED 1" FROM BOTTOM OF COLUMN OR 1/2" GALVANIZED STEEL ROD PLACED 2 1/2" FROM BOTTOM OF COLUMN.( SEE SECTION )ADDITIONAL CONCRETE IS MIX POURED AROUND BASE OF COLUMN THEN BACKFILLED WITH SOIL AND COMPACTED AT 8" INTERVALS SPLASHBOARDS - SPLASHBOARDS ARE NO 2 OR BETTER SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE 2"x8" S2S AND CENTER MATCHED, PRESSURE TREATED TO NET RETENTION OF 6 POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT WITH CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE TYPE III, OXIDE TYPE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICAN WOOD PRESERVERS' ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATION C2. ONE ROW IS FURNISHED FOR BUILDING ON A LEVEL SITE FRAMING LUMBER - SIDE NAILERS ARE 2"x4" SAS OR 2"x6" SPF NO.2 OR BETTER SPACED APPROXIMATELY 30" CC WITH ALL JOINTS STAGGERED AT ATTACHMENT TO COLUMNS. ROOF PURLINS ARE 2"x4" SAS NO 2 OR - BETTER ON EDGE SPACED APPROXIMATELY 24" O.0 ALL OTHER FRAMING LUMBER IS NO. 2 OR BETTER ( SEE SECTION ) ROOF TRUSSES - FACTORY ASSEMBLED WITH 18 OR 20 GAUGE GALVANIZED STEEL TRUSS PLATES AS REQUIRED AND KILN DRIED LUMBER AS SPECIFIED IN-PLANT QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTION IS CONDUCTED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE TPI INSPECTION BUREAU. TRUSSES ARE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STATED LOADING SIDING PANEI S (KYNAR 500/HYI AR 5000) - 0.019" MIN , G90 GALVANIZED OR AZ55 TYPICAL LUMBER SPECIFICATIONS - 1991 NDS GALVALUME, WITH AN ADDITIONAL BAKED-ON KYNAR 500/HYLAR 5000 FINISH. PAINT IS SIZE DESCRIPTION BENDING VALUE FIE " NOM. 1 MIL THICK ON EXTERIOR 2"x4NO.1&2 SPF 1313 PSI2"x4" 2100f MSR SPF 2100 PSI 2"x6" N0.1&2 SPF 1138 PSI FOO Ft - PANELS 'FLUOROFI EX 2000 (TM)1 —) 019" MIN , AZ55 GALVALUME WITH AN 2"x6" NO 1 SYR 1650 PSI - 1 ADDITIONAL BAKED-ON THICK POLYURETHANE PRIMER AND KYNAR 500/HYLAR 5000 TOPCOAT 2 'x8" NO1 SYR 1500 PSI NO 1 SYRI 300 PSI WITH A TOTAL MINIMUM PAINT THICKNESS OF 2 MILS. 2"x12" N0. 1 SYR 7250 PSI ALL 19501 MSR SYR 1950 PSI TRIM - DIE-FORMED TRIM OF 0.019" MIN„ G90 GALVANIZED OR AZ55 GALVALUME STEEL 1 1 2x16" LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER 2800 PSI 3 1 2"x15" GL -LAM 1650 PSI ON GABLES, RIDGES, CORNERS, BASE, WINDOWS, AND DOORS WITH SAME FINISH AS 51 4"x161 2" GL -LAM 2400 PSI 51 4"x191 2" GLU-LAM 24D0 PSI ROOFING OR SIDING PANELS NOTE HIGHER GRADE MATERIAL REQUIRED AS NOTED ON PLANS. ,QUIIER - 5" K-STYLE, .030 HIGH TENSILE ALUMINUM GUTTER, KYNAR 500/HYLAR 5000 FINISH TO MATCH TRIM, ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING. ADDITIONAL NOTES 1 ) ALL PLOT PLANS AND RELATED DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OWNER UNLESS INCORPORATED AS PART OF THESE DRAWINGS. S H E E T n I D r \ /n 2.) ALL INTERIOR PARTITIONS AND ROOM FINISHES IF NOT INCLUDED WITH THESE DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED SHEET J LL_DESCRIIPTIOtN [ BY OWNER STANDARD FINISHES SHALL HAVE LESS THAN 200 FLAME SPREAD RATING AS REQUIRED BY 1 OF 4 SPECIFICATIONS & SHEET INDEX E HO 4 COLUMN PLAN & ELEVATIONS ASTM E84 FOR ORDINARY CONDITIONS AND 25 OR LESS FOR EXITS, PASSAGEWAYS, AND CORRIDORS. OF 4 SECTIONS C: 3 ) FLOOR COVERINGS JUDGED TO REPRESENT AN UNUSUAL HAZARD SHALL MEET THE SAME TESTING PROCEDURES 4 TRUSS DRAWING R AS REQUIRED FOR WALL AND CEILING FINISHES. R R 4. MORTON BUILDINGS GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS APPLY UNLESS INDICATED DIFFERENTLY ON SPECIFIC R JOB DRAWINGS OR SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION 5 ) KYNAR 500 IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK OF ELF ATOCHEM NORTH AMERICA, HYLAR 5000 IS A TRADEMARK OF AUSIMONT, USA. /� T BUILDING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR DESIGN CRI E R A CS2x4FK 2-96 THIS BUILDING WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY ' USE GROUP O4 2 DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT��IIV--��aAA,M A DULY EGrSTEREO =v PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. � \ . � q CONSTRUCTION TYPE 5B </ � v�„_x_�^_ LIVE ROOF LOAD DESIGN 30 PSF WIND LOAD 80 MPH RONALD L. SUTTON, P.E LOOR AREA MICHAEL L McCORMICK P E. I1 '„ 2,520 SQ.FT. oATE: 3 -4 -4t REG, N . Q { NOV J' uJi s I CUPOLA VENT-A-RIDGE 12 5" O.G. GUTTER 4 T,y16 GABLE TRIM T#21 CORNER TRIM T#167 TRASITION TRIM T#21 CORNER TRIM T#167 BASE TRIM ® ® T#167 TRANSITION TRIM WEST ELEVATION T/167 BASE TRIM SOUTH ELEVATION VENT-A-RIDGE 12 12 5" O.G. GUTTER 4 T/j16 GABLE TRIM T#21 CORNER TRIM Ty167 TRASITION TRIM 1 T#21 CORNER TRIM T#167 BASE TRIM T#167 TRANSITION TRIM EAST ELEVATION J' T#167 BASE TRIM NORTH ELEVATION 7-6" 7_6. T 6" 7-6" J'-41/2" -0" VENTED SIDE OVERHANGS 7'- 1 1/2" 14•-10 1/2" 22'-4 1/2" 29'-10 1/2" 37'--4 1/2" 44'-10 1/2" 52'-41/2- 59,-9" I 2'-0" END OVERHANGS _o I A o _ r n COLUMN ELAN LEGEND r o ° - 3-2"x6" LAMINATED COLUMN LOCATION i w I • - HEADERED TRUSS LOCATION 3068 T-300 ALUM 9-LITE WALKDOOR (2) 4030 INS. SLIDING 9-LITE WINDOWS [RE (2) 12'x12' FRAMED OVERHEAD DOOR OPENINGS(6) 3065 SKYLITES 3'-6"x3'-6" CUPOLA W/0 FAN H 0 o I 3 m — -r —I 38'-„ 1/2er � J - 7'-4 1/2' J3'-Il 1/2" 25'-91/2^ 29'-101P" '37-4 12I / 50'-91/2' 59•_9" � - �. - 7'-4 1/2. 6'-7" C COLUMN PLAN SDS FF2000 HI—RIB STEEL :: 2"x4" PURLINS ® 24" O.C. (NO 2 SPF) 2"x4" BEV PURLIN FILLER STRIP 2"x6" BEV FASCIA e 5" O.G. GUTTERS T#144 & 146 FASCIA TRIM 42' S C TRUSS SOFFIT — HI—RIB/SOFFIT CAP ( 2) 1/2"x5 1/2" M. BOLTS & 2"x6" OVERHANG NAILER ( 8) 20d R S NAILS HI—RIB STEEL (KYNAR) .,2) 1/2"x5 1/2' M. BOLTS 3-2"x6" LAMINATED COLUMN ( 3) ROWS 2'x4" NAILERS 2100f MSR SPF 14'-0" GRADE TO HEEL 2"<10" HEADER (N0. 1 SYP) 42' S C TRUSS 3-2"x6" STUB COLUMN C T#167 TRANSITION TRIM — — 2"x6" NOTCHED NAILER 2"x10" HEADER (NO 1 SYP) HI—RIB STEEL WAINSCOT (KYNAR) (3) 2"x12" HEADERS (N0. 1 EYE) HEADER NAILING SCHEDULE 7/16" 058 PROTECTIVE LINER HEADER STUB JAMB MEMBER COLUMN COLUMN T#167 BASE TRIM 2"x6" BLOCK EA. 2"x12" 6 7 (1) ROW 2"x8" TREATED SPLASHBOARD T# 124 EA. 2"x10" 4 4" CONCRETE FLOOR (BY OWNER) T# 129 0 H D 2"x2" BLOCK ALUMASEAL NOTES T# 151 1 NUMBERS ABOVE ARE 20d R S. NAILS FINISH GRADE4" MINIMUMCOMPACTED GRANULAR BASE T# 154 T# 152 REQUIRED PER CONNECTION. 2. PRE—DRILL HEADERS AS REQUIRED (BY OWNER) 2"x3" JAMB (BEYOND) TO PREVENT SPLITTING. CONCRETE FLOOR NOTES 3. IF NUMBER OF NAILS REQUIRED FOR I.) 3500 PSI, 5 1/2 BAG MIX CONCRETE (3) 2"x6" JAMB COLUMN (BEYOND) HEADER TO JAMB COLUMN CONNECTION 2.) REINFORCING 6x6-10x10 WV IS EXCESSIVE TO CAUSE SPLITTING, 4'—D" 3.) SLOPE GRADE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING 2"x S" BLOCK BEYOND THE EXCESS NAILS MAY BE INSTALLED 0 2R MINIMUM FOR A DISTANCE OF 5' ( ) IN HEADER SUPPORT BLOCKING 4) 6 MIL POLYETHEYLENE VAPOR RETARDER PLACED 2" BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE CONCRETE FLOOR. 46M BASE ANCHORS O H D HEADER SECTION B - B 8" THICK READI—MIX PAD OR (4)50// BAGS OF SACKRETE PRE—MIXED W/WATER. PLACE SCALE: 'I " = 1'-0" ° (2)50# BAGS OF SACKRETE PRE—MIXED W/ WATER AROUND COLUMNS WHEN SETTING. NOTE: 20"b CORNER AND ENDWALL COLUMNS WILL HAVE 15" DIA HOLES W/4" THICK READI— MIX PADS OR (1)50# BAG OF SACKRETE. PLACE (1)50# BAG OF SACKRETE AROUND COLUMNS WHEN SETTING. SIDEWALL SECTION A- A 80 M.P.H. WIND LOAD SCALE 1/2" = 1'-0" TRUSS SPACING 7'-6" O.C. LIVE LOAD 30 PSF DEAD LOAD 4 PSF CEILING LOAD PSF TOTAL LOAD 34 PSF 10x15 PL C # 11x15 PL 8'3" WEB #'1 TC 1412 2"x4" WEB 12 STIFFENER � 4 WEB #2 3x5 PL. WEB $3 2••x D.. 16x9 PL. 18 GA. 13x8 PL. 18 GA. 16x10 PL. WEB #4 18 GA. 11x11 PL ••"°""' ...°. ..... .. .. 9x9 PL H.B. .......,. ••;::; ..... °..°. .......... ,., .... ..... . . ...... 2..x4. ,,, .................... 15_1/2„ ..... .... LOWER CH 2,.x6„ ...°......... CAMBER AT 5'O-1/4" 12'2-13/16" CENTERLINE 1-1/4" 20'10-1/2" TRUSS DESIGN SPECIFICATION: Truss has been designed by computer using the Purdue S. C .�� C TRUSS Plane Structure Analyzer IAW current standards and LJ specifications of recognized engineering principles. Output data will be provided upon request. 2/27/96 LUMBER SPECIFICATION (1991 NDS for Wood Construction): DATE: Lower Chord -- 1950f — 1.5E MSR Southern Pine CHECKED BY: Top Chord -- 1950f — 1.5E MSR Southern Pine — Top Chord --- No. 1 K.D — 19 Southern Pine DATE: Web Members -- No. 1 K.D. — 19 Southern Pine REVISED DATE: TRUSS PLATE SPECIFICATION (ICBG Evaluation Report No. 2929) REVISED DATE: ASTM A-446, Grade A 20 Go. and 18 Go where noted, REVISED DATE: galvanized steel Morton truss plates identified by a hexagon stomped every 1-1/4" along the center of the plate. REVISED DATE: RAFTER LENGTH 22'0-1/16" Webs are 2x4's SCALE: AS NOTED SHEEPfNO. 4 of �P G wet! wlfAln /Sv c a C L <q g N ' •LE, L G U N 59 5 O 1 wide ) s D* ' � � 91TE ( 49.5 e � c, 00 se,6 e m <,.fb 722540' x E 369.00' D s9i LAN —_ P 373.22' is®2 RLo10 O r ^O S' { 1 m 2y ^ _�. �aIIPj sac C 6 mo plea x KEY MAP 50,3"7- OF SEPTIC SYSTEM * 4 \ I M SCALES /' = 600' --_ ---� C.., 554 RADIUS WITHIN 130 O (r?.15 di NOEAHING POOL5 sv9 o•r maples 2y1"9j r 5b6 d'ovb/c Dov do avis✓o-r err9�o�'r � %IE S �9 / S. 60'21'52" E Ll� s,3 trJ! _ spa /a Hold f�'wf a / 0 �0 spec � nd '* I /F 695 /7 aI c .� — B r ,p. d /9 S 2 r I / Gar RQM FAME A 6R./Ofi� .rc 'Fa q /11 y ,.r ,Y ahem V r � 9r 5�'0 1 ICJ rc ss. w ,a 'LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE © - J�NESE MAPLES 3' HT 29 Y 4 Q�y JAPANESE BLACK PINE - 5'-6 HT. S 3' M£MTOm �' �: ✓F:b MYL,Ira• / � �r c`�!' f '0 S ,a,anC 1 r:. . / 6 /JZ - .�-•2°4�'s ©- ALBERTA. SPRUCE - 4' H T trap. �} I- v "� F / wiles. .�' = SUGAR MAPLE 2/1/12`-3" CALIPER .+ F'PY ' - t53 - $,S r r "Est P C7T� m— CAST IRON COVERS _ cA bP' el • :;S nfhw 5 T]C1d ® 2Y T 9 ,/ pd Q 29• 2 7- 0 29' gone re, „ m.�—.'—� . MW. }� ear INLET �' MIN. 4•DIA. �6'• l "L• OUTLET ! ,,ver leve I rpo�© rp / K ' i4 .� CLASS 2400 FLOW LINE / AG�`4 4, . ryry11 .® 1 j1ry, �G r /e '�- O PITCHEDI/4E OR �\' a. CL PITCHED \I 3 3 4' R @I I T �} ,,�f]�.D_ / [t B• P/PE OR EOU/V. J 3�s 31 32 3 M N� d M �q o �•F 'ZD 4 a ” 1 PITCHED I/e9P . Prop 54 ' d" ` ate` GVrI] •'\ � l r � R^T MMppVF 6RLYlNOWAF.� /D• G. ; _ ,;c — — ',/✓ 8�. YT' �,. - -�-•,— —. ' .'rim p � CYLINDRICAL SEPTIC TANK _ 1\ 2 =• E 130' RADIUS \uG#LL w L TOM aEAM pf �$ V' �/1M . Q ` _ ' OF SWBLII POINT ETC OR ART IR sAno s aA is ` �2 AI - - _ - v G _ 4 ,3 �ra5r wan NO FUEL TANKS 50, OF TYPICAL LEACHING POOL ¢A"oF.�d c2sllrpn coYsr' N — _ — PWeII WEL�PTWITHIN � � I PYPE GB'M ar ep.eim �'heilded e 9 e, �I fl {airhed vo+do L R 6 Sr - - IIghe A P��pdi'M) leve Well DRAINAGE CRITERIA - 7I9* �'S eaa��. . a 7, e I - 1 AREA ' 2i.s AcreG �,� ��` � � ' '',� � � � � c _ 20.85 n CI t3 A as k '- d o ® v e m e {(% b Q i5 R . w TF/IAIIY 116E " h CA •tc 6'L .. . R N l „ E b A , ti �_ p sr s w lr rw I r Ise 0 - 6 . . 0.85 2.5 x 60" 28 = 9282 cu.ft. 1 '.:� i. � o- 5 „ L. Asrw lurm nwr -x x x es6 rY {' I 4S ♦�q ae.ow 92e2r/42.2 = 220 V.F./12= Y8 7.p.s q ' leaching sea 01s u 'FF 1 - L.P. "' aaass imem Anvrne I 2 �� • �, 40 , Provide /9' I.ps 8'0 12 deep or equal z � , • I Y°GrA sr2o. Garr aEsr nrsc' AsrM srew.uos, Iu�160i rest ;^ _ PARKING CRITERIA 54 nv/is lreu Fnessrec mm OFFICE 2400s lF. 24 p. MN EO Pal MN 20 PSI-20 Pal niF. Q - ---�— writer I !® srA/v.Ess srnEv+ STORAGE 2100P sq,Il. 21 9 Tgas ® c) O-r ' \1 _ _ ° Q "QBTM"� REPAIR (Maintenance) 7$00 sq.Fl. 2 DRAINAGE LEACHING POOLS r' ® T c.P yl'r eI _ _ s A5 EMPLOYEE 20 WELL DETAIL 67 spaces Provided 68 spaces L-R \ level �"� *�,4 �R� 6+ l° et TEST BORING ' �O 01 A, � �' roPsoa !d +9 '' " ` B• SANDY SANITARY DESIGN � a 5 \ 2 LOAM POPULATION DENSITY ZONE /V ® 4 \ ` 300/9al/day x 6.91 acres = 2073 gal SAND — — _ — — — Ak� q Y)�j1 \ GRAVEL �TORAGE 80REPA/R 2228 0 sg9Pd. = 14.4gpd• WITH r Cr 5 S Cve��1�1nJ '' l \\ Q 22800 x 0.04 gpd. =9/2 gad. fan° V 0 Q SEPTIC TANK 056 g.p.d. I7 1056 g.p.d. 2 dayys flow = 2112 p d. 95 \ Provide 2500 gal. SEPTIC TANK 10'6 5' Deep _ O U1 LEACHING POOLS 0 1056 g d. 1056/1.5go1./sq.(1. = 704/25.1 =28 V.F. (L PROVIDE 4 l.ps 8'6 x /2 deep TRAFF/C£ FLOW DIRECTION DRAINAGE LIMIT LINE 5Rb '= EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED ELEVATION A _ \ CONTOUR LINES ARE REFERENCED TO NGVD. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVED PARKING AREAS I/ l N2` ASPHALT \ 2 1/2' BINDER =-- y--=- STABILIZED COMPACTED BASE \ \ I \ -LOW DENSITY MUSHROOM - TYPE LIGHT W \ � / - _ L - \ AREA = 6910 Acres AR aSTr29 Ll SCHOQL�TRlCT #`9 � A IA yt 11 J ,rl 1 .. �,� . � � : ,,,� �, ••�l`�:.",kir fo - v v \ "I'.:w siva_ y.. -;♦;�, '•i-; +-,.' ,5,*'�u' i -. V. "f..a�. s„�:q"�, '174�1Ji ' -_- — -- ._ _. A 1 Kz h �' ,k �h 1„ , 1 'q _ '". ', roti-'Wu„✓:� ,r. Wh, V`=. 4 �` ,, '. is - ' . - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - _ - _ — - - - 1 PLAN OF PROPERTY \ z FOR RI HARD W. �. w C CORAZZIIVI �' 1 ; �\ \ AT CUTCHOGUE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, N- Y. 1000 - 84 - 01 - 26.2 \ SCALE., 1"' _ 0' \ 1 \ 3 JUNE 14 1993 . 1 00 NO. DATE REVISION 6/5/93 ADDITIONS d REVISIONS 2 2/3/94 LQWER LEVEL, PARKING 8 1 \ \ O DRAINAGE b \ V V ` ` \ 3 4/!2(91 ADDITIONS 11 R,1 10N5 o \ \ \ \ 9 7Nf/94 &O,H. REVISIONS \ \ J \ \ \ 5 ' 71/9/95 B.O.H. REVISIONS > 1 \ 6 11112/95 KS. APPROVAL P P OV AL STAMP TRANSFERRED 7 12109105 REVISED i m ; LAYOUT �.' \ \ • \ 9 115196 REVISED BLDG. d LAYOUT — 1 S 4 4�40�' s \, i u �� 1 t APPROVED BY \ Y I I I PLANNING BOARD TOWN OF SOUTHOLD / I I � 8, lqq / 1 JAN 101996 / 500.85' w / / suuRrriLD rowN 7 , - / y �• , N pipe - • ' - - � .,. — �. ---'—•• / � / D u � P i �. /. ,",/ ^ .Y.S LIC. NO. 49618 W. / by N ✓ 7- 0 ;,, - OWNER ORS, P.C. / i OWN' of soumOLD R�cHARD W. cORAzziNr" r5r 0- 20 LUPIN DRIVE P, 0. 909 CUTCHOGUE, N.Y. MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971. 93-159 I