Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#8056-Mc Coyd ZBA application 0 R,ecG'ived AUG 14 2025 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT Zoning Board of Appear SOUTHOLD,NY NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL DATE: June 27, 2025 TO: Robert E. Herrmann(McCoyd) 1319 North Sea Road Southampton,NY 11968 Please take notice that your application dated May 5,2025: For permit: to demolish an e istin dwelling and to comastruct a new single-family dwellin and an aceessor ara at: Location of property: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd. Southold.N Y County Tax Map No. 1000—Section 87 Block 3 Lot 66.4 Is returned herewith and disapproved on the following grounds: l he ro Deed sin l -familv dwelling, on this non onformrmin 11. 07 art. ft. lot L__ f , buildable land in the R-40 District. is not erm.itted ursuamtt to Article XXIII Section 280-424 which states lots mrmeasurin less than 20.000 s uare feet in tonal size re wire a front yard setback of 35 feet. The ro Deed front and setback is 19.4 feel. Additionally, the Droposed accesso ara a is not permitted.,pursuant to Article 111 Section 2.80-15 which states aeceso buildimm s and stj°uctures shall be located in the required rear yard. and in the case of a waterfront arcel. accessot buildinpr. and structures ma be located in the front and arovidcd that such buildin sand stmmactures meet the front vard rincilDal setback re uirements asset forth by this Code and the side vard setback re uirernents for accesso buildin s .1 Subs ction B above. The accessory ara e is located in the side yard. Authorized Signature Note to Applicant: Any change or deviation to the above referenced application may require further review by the Southold Town Building Department. CC: file,Z.B.A. Received APPLICATION TO THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF APPEALS,BUG 14 2025 AREA VARIANCE Zoning Board of Appeals House No. 3360 Street Minnehaha Boulevard Hamlet Southold SCTM 1000 Section: 87 Block: 3 Lot(s) 66.4 Lot Size: 11,007 sf Zone R-40 I(WE)APPEAL THE WRITTEN DETERMINATION OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR DATED 6/27/25 BASED ON SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 4/9/25 Owner(s): Sean R. McCo d Mailing Address: 37 East Franklin Court, Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: 516-640-9156 Fax: Email:jrishchapter2Qy9hoo.com NOTE:In addition to the abt)ve,please complete below if application is signed by applicant's attorney,agent, architect,builder,contract vendee,etc.and name of person who agent represents: Name of Representative:En-Consultants for(4 Owner( )Other: Address: 1319 North Sea Road, Southampton, NY 11968 Telephone: 631-283-6360 Fax: 631-283-6136 Email:rherrmann@enconsultants.com Please check to specify who you wish correspondence to be mailed to,from the above names_ ( )Applicant/Owner(s), 0 Authorized Representative, ( )Other Name/Address below: WHEREBY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR REVIEWED SURVEY/SITE PLAN DATED 4/9/25 and DENIED AN APPLICATION DATED 5/2/25 FOR: Building Permit ( )Certificate of Occupancy O Pre-Certificate of Occupancy ( )Change of Use ( )Permit for As-Built Construction ( )Other: Provision of the Zoning Ordinance Appealed. (Indicate Article,Section,Subsection of Zoning Ordinance by numbers.Do not quote the code.) Article: XXIII / III Section: 280 / 280 Subsection: 124 / 15 Type of Appeal. An Appeal is made for: (0 A Variance to the Zoning Code or Zoning Map. ( )A Variance due to lack of access required by New York Town Law-Section 280-A. ( )Interpretation of the Town Code,Article Section ( )Request for Reversal or Overturn the Zoning Officer's Denial Other A prior appeal(0 has, ( )has not been made at any time with re:jject tg thi.1 propertl, UNDER Appeal No(s). 6804 Year(s). 2014 (Please be sure to research before completing this question or call our office for assistance) Fleeeived Page 2,Area Variance Application Revised 6/2023 AUG 14 ZZ25 REASONS FOR APPEAL Zoning Board of Appeals (Please be specific,additional sheets may be used with preparer's signature notarized): 1.An undesirable change will not be produced in the CHARACTER of the neighbor or a detriment to nearby properties if granted,because: See attached addendum. 2.The benefit sought by the applicant CANNOT be achieved by some method feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance,because: See attached addendum. 3.The amount of relief requested is not substantial because: See attached addendum. 4.The variance will NOT have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district because: See attached addendum. 5.Has the alleged difficulty been self created? { } Yes,or {�No Why: See attached addendum. • Are there any Covenants or Restrictions concerning this land? W No { }Yes(please furnish a copy) • This is the MINIMUM that is necessary and adequate,and at the same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health,safety and welfare of the community. By signing this document,the PROPERTY OWNER understands that pursuant to Chapter 280- 146(B)of the Code of the Town of Southold,any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three(3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1)year terms. IT IS THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE REQUIRED TIME FRAME DESCRIBED HEREIN. Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent (Agent must submit written Authorization from Owner) Robert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 7th day Coastal Management Specialist of, test � ,2025 KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York _ No.01 ST5015931 Cptary public Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires August 02,202 SEAN R. McCOYD 3360 MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD SOUTHOLD,NY Received SCTM#1000-87-3-66.4 AUG 14 2025 1) For the purpose of constructing a new, modernized FEMA-cornpliant single family dwellina and ead accessory garage in place of an existing FEMA-noncompliant dwelling wi� j jtl d%d , variance relief is requested for a 1 .4-1"1 front yard setback in place of the existing 17.7-ft setback, where a minimum of 35 feet is required pursuant to Town Code Section 280-124; and for placement of the garage in a side yard where a rear or front yard location is required pursuant to Section 280-15. The new dwelling will be code-compliant with respect to lot coverage and GFA, and it will establish a conforming 37.2-ft rear setback in place of the nonconforming 30.2-ft rear setback. The subject property is one of roughly twenty waterfront parcels created more than 80 years ago by the Map of Laughing Water Section No.I and has been improved with a dwelling since the 1930s. In its decision last year that granted relief for dwelling additions with a nonconforming front yard setback of 16.4 feet at 2880 Minnehaha Boulevard, 6 properties to the east,the Board described the neighborhood of Laughing Waters as a community"made up of a variety of house sizes and styles developed primarily in the mid-20th [c]entury(and many recently updated and enlarged), on a variety of small, less than code conforming lots both upland and waterfront. As a result of meandering roadways that follows the creekfront...many homes within the community have received various forms or variance relief from the Board of Appeals." The Board elaborated that the nonconforming front yard setback in that case would"not be discernible to passersby and residents of the neighborhood, since the immediate neighbors of the subject property also have non-compliant setbacks." A stronger version of the same argument can be made for the subject proposal because in addition to the nonconforming front yard setbacks of the surrounding homes (e.g.,house to east is 19.4 feet, same as proposed),the new dwelling would increase the existing front yard setback,whereas in Case 7901 the previously existing front yard setback was decreased as a result of the approved additions and alterations. Relief to create or maintain similar and lesser front yard setbacks has been granted to other properties in the neighborhood, including 2950 Minnehaha Boulevard, 5 properties to the east, where in 2006 additions and alterations increased the degree of nonconformity of a dwelling with a 16.2-foot setback(Case 5865). Thus, granting the requested front yard setback relief will not result in an undesirable change to the character of the neighborhood or detriment to nearby properties. The proposed 1-story garage, now to be separated from the dwelling as an accessory structure, also would not create a change in neighborhood character or detriment to the neighbors. Included with the above noted various forms of neighborhood variance relief granted by the Board of Appeals have been those for accessory structures in other than conforming yards. As described by the Board in its above referenced decision in Case 7901, which also permitted an accessory shed in a side yard, "garages, pools and sheds are common improvements within the Laughing Waters community." As another example, for 1515 Minnehaha Boulevard, located south and inland of the subject property,the Board in 2006 granted relief necessary to connect a previously existing accessory garage in a side yard to the primary dwelling structure with an addition, which Robert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 7th day of August, 2025 KIM H. STEPHENS f Notary Public-State of New York r No.01ST5015931 Qualified in Suffolk County My Commission Expires August 02,20 Z otary public created a nonconforming side yard setback to the dwelling/newly attached garage(base 631 V Here the applicants are seeking to do the opposite by separating the existing ad W orn the dwelling, which will comply with the required side yard setback. And though located in a side yard, the new detached garage and associated driveway are proposed in the saAWAAa1025 location as the existing attached garage and driveway, and the garage is set back roughly 8 feet farther from the road than the new dwelling, thereby keeping the appearalicn6swwwd of APpeWs structure, Maintaining an attached garage would create a longer and bulkier wel Ing structure that would exceed the maximum GFA the recently adopted Town code revisions sought to allow, so the accessory design creates the greatest harmony with the neighborhood character and the least impact on surrounding properties. 2) The benefit of constructing a new, modernized, energy efficient, FEMA-compliant dwelling in place of the existing aging, FEMA-non-compliant dwelling without creating additional non- compliant encroachment on the adjacent wetlands cannot be achieved without variance relief due to the parcel's nonconforming lot size, especially the very narrow depth between Minnehaha Boulevard and the seawall adjacent to Corey Creek. The depth of the new house has been minimally designed (18.4 to 24.5 feet) to allow increases in both the front and rear/wetland setbacks, but the less than 90 feet lot depth in the center of the property makes including even minimally sized, 5-foot wide waterside and/or front entry decks impossible without at least one setback variance. And it is not possible to include an attached or detached garage without at least one additional variance request, either for the excess GFA relief that would be necessitated by attaching the garage to the dwelling or the relief requested herein for an accessory garage in a side yard,and both the limited parcel depth and required wetland setbacks preclude placing an accessory garage to the rear of the dwelling. 3) The requested variance for a 19.4-foot front yard setback is mathematically substantial at approximately 45% relief from the required 35 feet. However, the relief is not substantial in fact because of the commonness of nonconforming front yard setbacks in the neighborhood (e.g., proposed setback is same as house to east)and because the proposed setback represents an increase to the lesser, 17.7-foot setback that has existed for almost 100 years. The requested relief for the garage is mathematically substantial because placement of an accessory structure in a nonconforming side yard location is typically considered to require 100 percent relief. However, the relief is not substantial in fact due to the commonness of garages and other accessory structures in the neighborhood and the facts that the garage will be only one story in height;will comply with the minimum required side yard setback; will be positioned farther from the road than the front of the dwelling; and together with the proposed driveway will be located in the same general location as the existing attached garage and driveway. It should also be noted that the total increase in lot coverage created by the project is 228 sf,which increases from 16.1 to 18.3 percent. 4) The variances necessary to undertake the project will not have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions on the site or surrounding neighborhood because the proposed project and associated mitigation measures have been designed to achiev a net beneficial environmental impact, specifically through a modest architectural design and mi ig tion measures to reduce Robert E. Herrmann Sworn to before me this 7th day of August,2025 KIM H. STEPH&Z V- N State of New York Notary Public- otary OP�ublic No.01 ST5015931 Qualified in Suffolk county My Commission Expires August 02,20-L'- potential flood damage; protect and improve water quality; and protect the quality and function of the adjacent tidal wetland ecosystem, as described below, Received a. The mass and height of the proposed dwelling are compliant with recently adoptel x:5 and sky plane limitations, and total lot coverage increases by only 21 I t� �8m�lipnt 18.3 percent. PPeals b. The FEMA-noncompliant dwelling would be replaced by a more highly elevated, FEMA- compliant dwelling with substantially reduced exposure to risks of flood and erosion damage. c. Whereas the closest point of the existing deck attached to the waterside of the dwelling is located 28.7 feet from the tidal waters/wetlands fronting the existing seawall adjacent to Corey Creek, the closest point of the new waterside deck is proposed 35.5 feet from the bulkhead,thus achieving a roughly 7 foot or 24% increase to the wetlands setback. d. The existing conventional septic system located approximately 60 feet from wetlands will be removed and replaced with a low-nitrogen, innovative/alternative sanitary system (I/A OWTS), which unlike conventional septic systems is designed to significantly reduce nitrogen loading into the groundwater table, located approximately 80 feet from wetlands, thus achieving a 20 foot or 33% increase to the septic system's wetlands setback. e. An existing asphalt driveway will be replaced with a pervious gravel driveway, thereby additionally decreasing lot coverage by impervious surface that is not counted as lot coverage. f. A 10' wide vegetated non-turf buffer is proposed to be established and permanently maintained adjacent to the seawall,thus restoring a portion of the historically cleared area of the property adjacent to the waterway, reducing the area of maintained and potentially treated turf lawn adjacent to wetlands, and increasing the separation distance between potentially treated turf lawn and adjacent waterway. g. A stormwater drainage system is proposed to capture and recharge roof runoff. h. A project limiting fence will be installed to contain site disturbance and potential surface runoff during construction. 2) Given the size and dimensions of the property,the historically preexisting nonconforming setbacks, and the fact that the proposed construction will either reduce or eliminate those setback nonconformities, the difficulty creating the need for variance relief for the construction of a replacement dwelling is not self-created. The difficulty creating the need for a side yard location variance for the detached garage is not self-created because the recently adopted limitations on GFA effectively forces the need to build an accessory rather than attached garage, and placement of the garage to the rear of the dwelling is precluded by the etre y limited parcel depth and required wetland setbacks. Hobert F, Herrmann Sworn to before me this 7th day of August, 2025 KIM H. STEPHENS Notary Public-State of New York No.01 ST5015931 a Qualified in Suffolk County 4ota/ ubl Public My Commission Expires August02,201� Zoning Board of Appeals APPLICANT'S PROJECT DESCRIPTION Deceived APPLICANT: Sean R. McCoyd SCTM No. 1000-87-3-66.AU r 14 2025 1.For Demolition of Existing Building Areas eal$ Zoning Board of App Please describe areas being removed:Existing 1-story dwelling with attached garage and deck. 11.New Construction Areas(New Dwelling or New Additions/Extensions): Dimensions of first floor extension: N/A Dimensions of new second floor: 28'-6"x 24'-6"and 14'x 20'over new first floor Dimensions of floor above second level: N/A Height(from existing natural grade): 32'-4" Is basement or lowest floor area being constructed?If yes,please provide height(above ground)measured from natural existing grade to first floor: o slab I11.Proposed Construction Description(Alterations or Structural Changes) (Attach extra sheet if necessary). Please describe building areas: Number of Floors and General Characteristics BE LIRE Alterations: See attached project description. Number of Floors and Changes WITH Alterations: IV. Calculations of building areas and lot coverage,sky plane(From Surveyor,Design Professional): Existing square footage of buildings on your property: 1,705 sf Proposed increase of building coverage: 228 sf Square footage of your lot: 11 007 sf; 10,565 sf Buildable Land Percentage of coverage of your lot by building area(lot coverage) 16.1% existing; 18.3% proposed Cross Floor Ar a(GF'A')of single family dwelling including the attached garage and/or habitable detached accessory stricture: (Please refer to Chapter 280,Section 280-207 of the Town Code): 2,160 sf proposed For Residential lots,is project within the allowable Sky Plane?(Please refer to Chapter 280, Section 280-208 of the Town Code): Yes V.Purpose of New Construction:Construction of a new modernized, FEMA-com liant single-family dwelling and accesory garage in place of an existing dwelling and attached garage with an original construction date in the 193Us. VI.Please describe the land contours(flat,slope %,heavily wooded, marsh area,etc.) on your land and how it relates to the difficulty in meeting the code requirement(s): Describe on separate page if needed: The property is relatively flat but low in elevation and adjacent to Corey Creek, and thus subject to wetlands setback restrictions that create difficulties in meeting all zoning code re uirements see response to"Reasons for Ap2eal"#2 Please submit 8 sets of photos,labeled to show different angles of yard areas after staking corners for for further details), new construction,and photos of building area to be altered with yard view. SEAN R. McCOYD Received 3360 MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD SOUTHOLD,NY AUG 14 2025 SCTM#1000-87-3-66.4 Zoning Board of Appeals Demolish and remove existing 1,360 sf, 1-story dwelling with attached garage and deck, and construct in its place a new 1,182 sf, 1 & 2-story, single-family dwelling with a 143 sf covered entry deck and 135 sf covered waterside deck with associated steps, and a 432 sf, 1-sty accessory garage; install wood utility platform and 4' x 7' outdoor shower;replace existing asphalt driveway with pervious gravel driveway; remove existing septic system and install new I/A OWTS sanitary system; install stormwater drainage system; and establish a 10-foot wide vegetated non-turf buffer adjacent to existing concrete seawall, all as depicted on the survey/site plan prepared by Young Associates, last dated April 9, 2025, and architectural plans prepared by Barbara M. Ruggiero Architect PC, dated April 28, 2025. k. vked 6lA023 QUESTIONNAIRE heceived FOR FILING WITH YOUR ZBA APPLICATION AUG 14 2025 A. Is the subject premises currently listed on the real estate market for sale? Yes X No Zoning Board of Appeals B. Are there any proposals to change or alter land contours? X No Yes,please explain on separate sheet. C. 1.)Are there areas that contain sand or wetland grasses? Yes 2.)Are those areas shown on the survey submitted witti this application'? Yes 3.)Is the property bulk headed between the wetlands area and the upland building area? Yes 4.)If your property contains wetlands or pond areas,have you contacted the Office of the BOARD OF TRUSTEES for its determination of jurisdiction? No Please confirm status of your inquiry or application with the Board of Trustees: A wetlands permit application will be filed upon issuance of ZBA determination. If issued,please attach copies of your permit listing conditions of approval with a copy of the approved survey. D. Is there a depression or sloping elevation near the area of proposed construction at or below five feet above mean sea level? Yes E. Are there any patios,concrete barriers,bulkheads or fences that exist that are not shown on the survey that you are submitting? No _ If any of the aforementioned items exist on your property,please show them on a site plan. F. Are there any construction projects currently in process on your property? No If yes,please submit a copy of your building permit and survey as approved by the Building Department and please describe scope of work: G. Please attach all pre-certificates of occupancy and certificates of occupancy for the subject premises. If none exist,please apply to the Building Department to obtain them or to obtain an Amended Notice of Disapproval. Pre Existing Certificate of Occupancy#35778 H. Do you or any co-owner also own other land adjoining or close to this parcel? No If yes,please label the proximity of your lands on your survey and identify the Suffolk County Tax Map No._................ I. Please list present use or operations conducted at your property, and/or the proposed use Existing single-family dweling with attached garage„ same with accessory garage. J. (eticampl existing single family,proposed:same with garage,pool or other) August 7, 2025 Authorized signature Date Robert E. Herrmann Coastal Management Specialist Town of Southold 5/27/2015In P.O.Box 1179 53095 Main Rd Southold,New York 11971 Received _ AUG 1...4 0 CE:FTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Board of Appeals No: 35777 Date: 6/25/2012 THIS CERTIFIES that the building RESIDENTIAL ADDITION Location of Property: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd, Southold SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 87.-3-66.4 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 3/27/1980 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 10604 dated 3/27/1980 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: additarnlaltatio t an existira one famil d+.vellin as a lied for. Corrected on /20/201.5 to change a_r licatioq.dgte_from 1/11190�9,.:tr 31 7/1950. The certificate is issued to Sean&Jennifer McCoyd _. of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. N495431 10/1/80 a PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED Au o ed ignat Town of Southold Annex 6/27/2012 54375 Main Road Southold,New York 11471 Received AUG 14 2025 " ,G1 PRE EXISTING zoning Board of Appeals CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No: 35778 Date: 6/27/2012 THIS CERTIFIES that the structure(s)located at: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd, Southold SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 87.-3-66.4 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the requirements for a built prior to APRIL 9, 1957 pursuant to which CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NUMBER Z- 3578 dated 6/27/2012 was issued and conforms to all the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: wood frame,yne fan- dwelling with attached one car garage and 1.arick ap tio.*' IgOI 1 : P 4 add/alt COL-3 77 1�10`l"l�; E ectrical violation:electrical and in closet., The certificate is issued to Stiber, Natalie �... .. .. (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED *PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSPECTION REPORT. '"µAutho " �.ign r Town of Southold Annex 8/31/2012 P.O. Box 1179 " 54375 Main Road ark Southold, New York 11971 ReceV CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Board of Hpp,e@as No: 35927 Date: 8/31/2012 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ELECTRICAL Location of Property: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd, Southold, SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 87.-3-66.4 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. . conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated P g 3 � �.....� 8/8/20/2012 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 7456 dated 20/2012 was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: 00 anip Overhead Service The certificate is issued to Stiber,Carolyn&Stiber,Alexander (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 37456 08/29/2012 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED _ - .. Authorized Signature Town of Southold Annex 9/18/2013 P.O.Box 1179 54375 Main Road Southold,New York 11971 Received _. w__.._. .._m..__._ _ ....�._ . a.__,... . .. .._.__ ._..... ..� AUG 14 2025__..._ _v.w CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Zoning Board of Appeals No: 36512 Date: 9/18/2013 THIS CERTIFIES that the building ALTERATION Location of Property: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd, Southold, SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 87.-3-66.4 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this officed dated 10/25/201 2 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 37625 � dated 11/9 201 tlm was issued, and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: alteratign&/Mairs to an ex° tin ta�rnily dwelling as applied for.. The certificate is issued to McCoyd,Sean&McCoyd,Jennifer ............._.. ...__.�.._�__...._ �.......� (OWNER) of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. 37625 9/3/13 PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED 9/12/12 Cutchogue East Plumbing . ...... Signat& .�m Town of Southold 5/14/2015 P.O.Box 1179 n n 53095 Main Rd Received ` yp Southold,New York 11971 J AUG 14 2025 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY zoning Board of Appea-If. No: 37559 Date: 5/14/2015 THIS CERTIFIES that the building DECK Location of Property: 3360 Minnehaha Blvd, Southold SCTM#: 473889 Sec/Block/Lot: 87.-3-66.4 Subdivision: Filed Map No. Lot No. conforms substantially to the Application for Building Permit heretofore filed in this office dated 1/8/2015 pursuant to which Building Permit No. 39491 dated 1/15/2015 was issued,and conforms to all of the requirements of the applicable provisions of the law. The occupancy for which this certificate is issued is: DEC K_ADDITION''T"O All EXISTING ONE FAMILY DWELLING AS LER ZBA DE+C1SlON#6804 DATED 11-201-2-2014 AS APPLIED FOR i I n The certificate is issued to McCoyd,Sean&McCoyd,Jennifer of the aforesaid building. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVAL ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATE NO. PLUMBERS CERTIFICATION DATED orize Signature 4 BOARD MEMBERS r�Qr Soll1� Southold Town Hall Leslie Kanes Weisman,Chairperson "` "� 53095 Main Road-P.O.Box 1179 Southold,NY 11971-0959 Eric Dantes Office Location: Gerard P.Goehringer Town Annex/First Floor,Capital One Bank George Horning ' * 54375 Main Road(at Youngs Avenue) Kenneth Schneider , Southold,NY 11971 http://southoldtown.northfork.net - - 15 � ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOV 2 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD D Tel.(631)765-1809-Fax(631)765-9064 F,nr, ��. 1. FINDINGS,DELIBERATIONS AND DETERMINATION Received MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20,2014 AUG 14 2025 ZBA FILE#6804 NAME OF APPLICANT: Sean McCoyd SCTM# 1000-82AWBoard of Appeals PROPERTY LOCATION:3360 Minnehaha Boulevard(adj.to Corey Creek), Southold,NY SE RA DE N TIQ The Zoning Board of Appeals has visited the property under consideration in this application and determines that this review falls under the Type II category of the State's List of Actions, without further steps under SEQRA. SUFFOLK COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE: This application was referred as required under the Suffolk County Administrative Code Sections A 14-14 to 23, and the Suffolk County Department of Planning issued its reply dated October 30, 2014 stating that this application is considered a matter for local determination as there appears to be no significant county-wide or inter-community impact. LWRP DETERMINATION: This application was referred for review under Chapter 268,Waterfront Consistency Review of the Town of Southold Town Code and the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program (LWRP) Policy Standards. The LWRP Coordinator issued a recommendation dated October 24, 2014. Based upon the information provided on the LWRP Consistency Assessment Form submitted to this department, as well as the records available to us, it is our recommendation that the proposed action is CONSISTENT with LWRP policy standards f and therefore is CONSISTENT with the LWRP. OPERTY ACTS/D S T'IO'N. The parcel is a non-conforming 9,673 square foot water front parcel located in an R-40 zone. The parcel is developed with 1 story frame house and garage. The property has 132.42 feet along Corey Creek. The property then runs 105.37 feet along the East side, 109.75 feet along Minnehaha Blvd. and 89.23 feet along the West side. There is a dock, ramp, and floating dock on Corey Creek. A small section of the front yard is in Flood Zone X. The majority of the property is in Flood Zone AE El. 6. The survey shows that there is a proposed line of hay bales set back I5 feet from the concrete wall. The existing house is set back 35 feet from the concrete wall. All is shown on a survey by John T Metzger L.L.S. dated December 19,2012 and last updated September 18,2014. BASIS OF APPLICATION: Request for Variance from Article XXII Section 280-116B and the Building Inspector's September 30, 2014 Notice of Disapproval based on an application for building permit to construct a deck addition to an existing single family dwelling, at; 1)less than the code required bulkhead setback of 75 feet. RELIEF REQUESTED: The applicant requests a variance to construct a raised deck set back 29 feet from the concrete wall,where the code requires a 75 foot bulkhead setback. Page 2 of 3—November 20,2014 MA0804—McCoyd SCTM#1000-87-3-66.4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The applicant submitted (4) letters in support of his application. The applicant also presented four prior Zoning Board of Appeals decisions granting variances for raised deMingerP4tiested a Blvd. These decks have similar bulkhead/concrete wall setbacks to the concrete wall setback by the applicant. The variances are ZBA file No.'s 3937;4973; 5028; and 5065. AUG 1 4 FINDINGS OF FACTI REASONS FOR CARD ACTIOI T; Zoning Board of Appeal The Zoning Board of Appeals held a public hearing on this application on November 6,2014 at which time written and oral evidence were presented. Based upon all testimony,documentation,personal inspection of the property and surrounding neighborhood, and other evidence,the Zoning Board finds the following facts to be true and relevant and makes the following findings: 1. Town Law§261-bUl(W(l). Grant of the variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The neighborhood consists of modest single-family homes. Rear decks are common in the neighborhood. The deck is in the rear of the house and will not be seen from the street. Existing vegetation will limit the adjoining neighbor's view of the deck. 2. Town Law 267-b 3 b 2 .The benefit sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue,other than an area variance. The lot size and current configuration of the house is such that any expansion of the house will require a variance. 3. Town Law 267-b 3 b . The variance granted herein is mathematically substantial,representing 62%relief from the code. However,the existing home is set back 35 feet from the concrete wall. The new raised deck is only six feet closer to the concrete wall than the house already sits. 4. Town,Law. 267b .la o...evidence has been submitted to suggest that,a variance in this residential community will have an adverse impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. The applicant must comply with Chapter 236 of the Town's Storm Water Management Code and all storm water management will be in place during construction and the deck will be open to the sky. 5. Town.Law 267-b 3 b . The difficulty has been self-created. The applicant purchased the parcel after the Zoning Cade was in effect and it is presumed that the applicant had actual or constructive knowledge of the limitations on the use of the parcel under the Zoning Code in effect prior to or at the time of purchase. 6. Town Law 267-b. Grant of the requested relief is the minimum action necessary and adequate to enable the applicant to enjoy the benefit of a raised deck while preserving and protecting the character of the neighborhood i and the health,safety and welfare of the community. RESOLUTION OF THE BO In considering all of the above factors and applying the balancing test under Member Schneider, an d dui _ seconded b Y New York Town Law 267 B, motion was offered by Member Dantes, s y carried,to GRANT,the variance as applied for, and shown on the Architectural Drawings by Barbara M.Ruggiero, Architect labeled A-01, 02 and dated September 30, 2014 and the site plan by John T. Metzger L.L.S. dated December 19, 2012, last revised September 18,2014. Subject to the following condition; CONDITION: 1)The deck shall remain open to the sky. That the above conditions be written into the Building Inspector's Certificate of Occupancy, when issued. Received f Paoe 3 of 3—November 20,2014 ZBAt16804 AUG 1025 4 2025 SCTM41000-87-3-66.4 Any deviation from the survey,site plan and/or architectural drawings cited in this decision a� 7 e ay eals and/or a possible denial by the Building Department of a building permit and may require a new application and public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Any deviation from the variances)granted herein as shown on the architectural drawings, site plan and/or survey cited above, such as alterations, extensions, or demolitions, are not authorized under this application when involving nonconformities under the zoning code. This action does not authorize or condone any current or future use, setback or other feature of the subject property that may violate the Zoning Code, other than such uses, setbacks and other features as are expressly addressed in this action. The Board reserves the right to substitute a similar design that is de minimis in nature for an alteration that does not increase the degree of nonconformity. Vote of the Board: Ayes:Members Weisman (Chairperson),Schneider,Horning, Dantes. (Absent was:Member Goehringer) This Resolution was duly adopted(4-0). l Leslie Kanes Weisman, Chairperson Approved for filing / /�S"/2014 ...............-----------— AGRICULTURAL DATA STATEMENT Received G ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AUG 14 2025 WHEN TO USE THIS FORM: This form must be completed by the applicantforEMMiWdWaVOe of Appeals permit,site plan approval,use variance, area variance or subdivision approval on property within an agricultural district OR within 500 feet of a farm operation located in an agricultural district. All applications requiring an agricultural data statement must be referred to the Suffolk County Department of Planning in accordance with Section 239m and 239n of the General Municipal Law. 1. Name of Applicant: Sean R. MCCoyd 2. Address of Applicant: 37 East Franklin Court, Garden City, NY 11530 3. Name of Land Owner(if other than Applicant):same 4. Address of Land Owner: 5. Description of Proposed Project:See attached project description. 6. Location of Property: (Road and Tax map Number), 1 0100- 7-3-66.4 7. Is the parcel within 500 feet of a farm operation? { } Yes {X} No 8. Is this parcel actively farmed? { } Yes {X} No 9. Name and addresses of any owner(s)of land within the agricultural district containing active farm operations. Suffolk County Tax Lot numbers will be provided to you by the Zoning Board Staff,it is your responsibility to obtain the current names and mailing addresses from the Town Assessor's Office(765-1937) or from the Real Property Tax Office located in Riverhead. NAME and ADDRESS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (Please use the back lot this page if there are additional property owners) 08 / 07 2025 Signature of ApplicantRabert I . Herrmann Date Coastal Management Specialist Note: 1.The local Board will solicit comments from the owners of land identified above in order to consider the effect of the proposed action on their farm operation. Solicitations will be made by supplying a copy of this statement. 2. Comments returned to the local Board will be taken into consideration as part as the overall review of this application. 3. Copies of the completed Agricultural Data Statement shall be sent by applicant to the property owners identified above. The cost for mailing shall be paid by the Applicant at the time the application is submitted for review. SEAN R. McCOYD 3360 MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD Received SOUTHOLD,NY SCTM#1000-87-3-66.4 AUG 14 2025 Zoning Board of Appeals Demolish and remove existing 1,360 sf, 1-story dwelling with attached garage and deck, and construct in its place a new 1,182 sf, 1 & 2-story, single-family dwelling with a 143 sf covered entry deck and 135 sf covered waterside deck with associated steps, and a 432 sf, 1-sty accessory garage; install wood utility platform and 4' x 7' outdoor shower;replace existing asphalt driveway with pervious gravel driveway; remove existing septic system and install new I/A OWTS sanitary system; install stormwater drainage system; and establish a 10-foot wide vegetated non-turf buffer adjacent to existing concrete seawall, all as depicted on the survey/site plan prepared by Young Associates, last dated April 9, 2025, and architectural plans prepared by Barbara M. Ruggiero Architect PC, dated April 28, 2025. 617.20 Appendix B vieceived Short Environmental Assessment Form �Ao Instructions for Cow AUG 14 2025�. rd of Appeals Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the complex WOOPM Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: McCoyd Reconstruction Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 3360 Minnehaha Blvd,Southold,SCTM#1000-87-3-66.4;located on north side of Minnehaha Blvd,north of Owaissa Avenue(map provided). Brief Description of Proposed Action: Demolish and remove existing 1,360 sf, 1-story dwelling with attached garage and deck„and construct in its place a new 1,182 sf, 1 &2-story,single-family dwelling with a 143 sf covered entry deck and 135 sf covered waterside deck with associated steps,and a 432 sf, 1-sty accessory garage; install wood utility platform and 4°x T outdoor shower„replace existing asphalt driveway with pervious gravel driveway; remove existing septic system and install new VA OWTS sanitary system;install stormwater drainage system;and establish a 10-foot wide vegetated non-turf buffer adjacent to existing c oncrete seawall,all as depicted on the survey/site plan prepared by Young Associates„last dated April 91,2025,and architectural plans prepared by Barbara M. Ruggiero Architect PC,dated April 28,2025. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 516-640-9156 Sean R. McCoyd E-Mail: Inshchapter2@yahoo.com Address: 37 East Franklin Court City/PO: State: Zip Code., Garden City NY 111530 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. V 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: Town of Southold Board of Trustees, Town of Southold Building Department 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 11,007 sf b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 8, 114 sf c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 11,007 sf 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑ Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) ❑Industrial ❑ Commercial VResidential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 4 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing bp�l� NO YES landscape? it 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical ErA0"eTJ a? NO _ YES If Yes,identify: 1 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: N/A 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment:w N/A mm w 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area'? 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: U(Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban ldSuburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO ❑YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO❑YES Page 2 of 4 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO I YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: Y-1 -11, 1 Ned- 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? AUG 14 2025 If Yes,describe: vri Roard of Appeas 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THEjINORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY NVLEDGE pp p E. HerrmannAugust 7, 2025 A licantls onsor name:KNONana errdent Specialist, En-Consultants Date: Signature: Part 2-Impact Assessment. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 2. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning regulations? 2_ Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate reasonably available ener y conservation or renewable eneM opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, architectural or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, waterbodies,groundwater,air quality,flora and fauna)? Page 3 of 4 No,o Moderate `mall to rge eapact may may o r 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage problems? Zonla Board of Apogg 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? Part 3-Determination of significance. The Lead Agency is responsible for the completion of Part 3. For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting,probability of occurring, duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude_ Also consider the potential for short-term,long-term and cumulative impacts. G Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) Page 4 of 4 �..� �a .d �'y� Park � � �"` �_�.��,"' �' > N" r wa. d&T �......�..x Pnitd Camp�ditrip AUG 05 et' teal " w�e�hn�15rY � �l IP tn. d Zoning rd of Ap at ' " y � c,f a ntrry s Pt oC � o ' r Polo wta � '�� 131 EDON H15 Sot r S VI pg�aat � a Park ''"�,, jw y� Founders Southol C, � Iatpdfn 5i HS � 41t d,, Harper Pt BA- 37 .0" a .m- ✓ "_"" ,��'�� »-' q'`� Vie"w So that r— tUIwW IISwCgI i': w� " W� "^r .„�.•�� 61 .. ..._,.,�..�.. F1dYl lnstitutn � ,� .. r� FF71g pp Point Rig, r ",Ao�, GREAT HOG NECK - 36 ' , .� ..� AYVIEW �-- , :... . _ + 1�via a W t 5ubject rropertq) ?ark �� rst U Coney Ud Boo h CI'L'L'IC C DAR B AC w R I1` " .w Cedar Beach Point IOC NECK f Suffolk Count Ha strom Map#44 BAD °—+21000' a ss° 72 z5'ao aa�5 � _ 0 r f!s .. ..,.e.... .........Y.�....._._,.,�...—. ....,,m vHagytrom Map Company.lm �. .. �.... __z. Joins Map 62 ` ®Hagsrrom Map Company.Inc Board of Zoning Agpeals ApRlication Received OWNER'S( UTORIZATION AUG 14 2025 Applicantis not the Owner) Zoning Board of Appeals I, Sean R. McCoyd residing at 3360 Minneh'aha Blvd. (Print property owner's name) (Mailing Address) Southold, NY 11971 do hereby authorize (Agent) En-Consultants to apply for variance(s) on my behalf from the Southold Zoning Board of Appeals. By signing this document,the Property Owner understands that pursuant to Chapter 280- 146(B)of the Code of the Town of Southold any variance granted by the Board of Appeals shall become null and void where a Certificate of Occupancy has not been procured,and/or a subdivision map has not been filed with the Suffolk County Clerk,within three(3)years from the date such variance was granted. The Board of Appeals may,upon written request prior to the date of expiration,grant an extension not to exceed three(3)consecutive one(1)year terms. 1T IN THE PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE REQUIRED TIME ERAi41.E DESCRIBED HEREIN. (Owner's Signature) Sean R. McCo d (Print Owner's Name) Receiveci AUG 14 2025 APPLICANT/OWNER TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM Zoning Board of Appeals The Town of Southold's Code of Ethics probihits conflicts of interest on the 22rt pf town officers and em to ees.T1tc Ramose oC thij form is to provide information wWSh can alert the town of gossible sanflicts of interest and allow it to take whatever ct n is necMIM to avoid same. YOURNAME : MCCOYD, SEAN R. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance X Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) C)an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP Submitted this 4.,(LI day of ,20 Signature Print Name Sean R. McCoyd Received AUG 14 2025 AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE TRANSACTIONAL DISCLOSURE FORM Zoning Board of Appeals The'rown of Southold's Code of Ethics prohibits conflicts of interest oil the part of town officers and eniplovees.The puip-ose of this form is to provide information which can algft the town of possible conflicts of interest and allow Lt!I( take whatever action is aecemiaruv Io gvoid mme. YOUR NAME: Hermann, Robert E. (Last name,first name,middle initial,unless you are applying in the name of someone else or other entity,such as a company.If so,indicate the other person's or company's name.) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Check all that apply) Tax grievance Building Permit Variance XX Trustee Permit Change of Zone Coastal Erosion Approval of Plat Mooring Other(activity) Planning Do you personally(or through your company,spouse,sibling,parent,or child)have a relationship with any officer or employee of the Town of Southold?"Relationship"includes by blood,marriage,or business interest."Business interest"means a business,including a partnership,in which the town officer or employee has even a partial ownership of(or employment by)a corporation in which the town officer or employee owns more than 5%of the shares. YES NO XX If you answered"YES",complete the balance of this form and date and sign where indicated. Name of person employed by the Town of Southold Title or position of that person Describe the relationship between yourself(the applicant/agent/representative)and the town officer or employee. Either check the appropriate line A)through D)and/or describe in the space provided. The town officer or employee or his or her spouse,sibling,parent,or child is(check all that apply) - A)the owner of greater that 5%of the shares of the corporate stock of the applicant(when the applicant is a corporation) B)the legal or beneficial owner of any interest in a non-corporate entity(when the applicant is not a corporation) Q an officer,director,partner,or employee of the applicant;or D)the actual applicant DESCRIPTION OF RELATIONSHIP (IN Submitted this 7th of August 20 25 Signature Print Name Robert E. Herrmann Town of Southold Received LWRP CONSISTENCY ASSESSMENT FORM AUG 14 2025 A. INSTRUCTIONS l, All applicants for permits* including Town of Southold agencies, sgWd"W this MAV for proposed actions that are subject to the Town of Southold Waterfront Consistency Review Law. This assessment is intended to supplement other information used by a Town of Southold agency in making a determination of consistency. *Except minor exempt actions including Building Permits and other ministerial permits not located within the Coastal Erosion Hazard Area. 2. Before answering the questions in Section C, the preparer of this form should review the exempt minor action list, policies and explanations of each policy contained in the Town of Southold Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. A proposed action will be evaluated as to its si nificant beneficial and adverse effects upon the coastal area which includes all of Southold Town). If any question in Section C on this form is answered "yes" or "no", then the proposed action will affect the achievement of the LWRP policy standards and conditions contained in the consistency review law. Thus each answer must be explained in detail listing both supporting and non- supporting facts. If an action cannot be certified as consistent with the LWRP policy standards and conditions, it shall not be undertaken. A copy of the LWRP is available in the following places: online at the Town of Southold's website (southoldtown.northfork.net), the Board of Trustees Office, the Planning Department, all local libraries and the Town Clerk's office. B. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSED ACTION SCTM# 87 - 3 - 66.4 PROJECT NAME Sean R. McCoyd The Application has been submitted to (check appropriate response): Town Board El Planning BoardEl Building Dept. 0 Board of Trustees Category of Town of Southold agency action (check appropriate response): (a) Action undertaken directly by Town agency (e.g. capital ❑ construction, planning activity, agency regulation, land transaction) (b) Financial assistance (e.g. grant, loan, subsidy) El (c) Permit, approval, license, certification: Nature and extent of action: Demolish and remove existing 1,360 sf, 1-story dwelling with attached garage and deck, and construct in its place a new 1,182 sf, 1 & 2-story,single-family dwelling with a 143 sf covered entry deck and 135 sf covered waterside deck with associated steps,and a 432 sf, 1-sty accessory garage; install wood utility platform and 4'x 7'outdoor shower;replace existing asphalt driveway with pervious gravel driveway;remove existing septic system and install new I/A OWTS sanitary system; install stormwater drainage system;and establish a 10-foot wide vegetated non-turf buffer adjacent to existing concrete seawall,all as depicted on the survey/site plan prepared by Young Associates, last dated April 9,2025,and architectural plans prepared by Barbara M. Ruggiero Architect PC,dated April 28,2025, Pursuant to Southold Town Code §268-5("Review of Actions")and the corresponding definitions of"actions"and"minor actions"by §286-3 ("Definitions"),the proposed work meets the following definition of a minor action and should thus be determined to be exempt from waterfront consistency review: "F.Granting of individual setback, lot line and lot area variances,except in relation to a regulated natural feature or a bulkhead or other shoreline defense structure or any activity within the CEHA." Therefore,all policies are noted herein as "Not Applicable. Location of action: 3360 Minnehaha Boulevard, Southold . ed Site acreage: 11,007 sf AUt+4 2025 Present land use: Residential,single-family dwelling with attached garage A of Appeals Zoning Present zoning classification: R-40 2. If an application for the proposed action has been filed with the Town of Southold agency, the following information shall be provided: (a) Name of applicant: Sean R. McCo d (b) Mailing address: 37 East Frank Court Garden City,NY 11530 (c) Telephone number: Area Code 516-640-9156 (d) Application number, if any: Will the action be directly undertaken, require funding, or approval by a state or federal agency? Yes ❑ No If yes, which state or federal agency"; C. Evaluate the project to the following policies by analyzing how the project will further support or not support the policies. Provide all proposed Best Management Practices that will further each policy. Incomplete answers will require that the form be returned for completion. DEVELOPED COAST POLICY Policy 1. Foster a pattern of development in the Town of Southold that enhances community character, preserves open space, makes efficient use of infrastructure, makes beneficial use of a coastal location, and minimizes adverse effects of development. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Page 2 for evaluation criteria. Yes 1:1 No X Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 2. Protect and preserve historic and archaeological resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 3 through 6 for evaluation criteria n �J Yes No N Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Zoning Board of Appes43 Policy 3. Enhance visual quality and protect scenic resources throughout the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 6 through 7 for evaluation criteria ❑Yes ❑ No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary NATURAL COAST POLICIES Policy 4. Minimize loss of life, structures, and natural resources from flooding and erosion. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 8 through 16 for evaluation criteria E]Yes 1:1 No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 5. Protect and improve water quality and supply in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies Pages 16 through 21 for evaluation criteria Yes Ej No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 6. Protect and restore the quality and function of the Town of Southold ecosystems including Significant Coastal Fish and Wildlife Habitats and wetlands. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 22 through 32 for evaluation criteria. ❑ Yes No Not Applicable AUG 14 Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 7. Protect and improve air quality in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III — Policies Pages 32 through 34 for evaluation criteria. Yes [:] No® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 8. Minimize environmental degradation in Town of Southold from solid waste and hazardous substances and wastes. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 34 through 38 for evaluation criteria. F Yes No Not Applicable a PUBLIC COAST POLICIES Policy 9. Provide for public access to, and recreational use of, coastal waters, public lands, and public resources of the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 38 through 46 for evaluation criteria. Yes E] No MNot Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary WORKING COAST POLICIES Policy 10. Protect Southold's water-dependent uses and promote siting of new water-dependent uses in suitable locations. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 47 through 56 for evaluation criteria. Yes [:1 No M Not Applicable Received Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 11. Promote sustainable use of living marine resources in Long Island Sound, the Peconic Estuary and Town waters. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 57 through 62 for evaluation criteria. 0 Yes F No Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 12. Protect agricultural lands in the Town of Southold. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 62 through 65 for evaluation criteria. El Yes El No ® Not Applicable Attach additional sheets if necessary Policy 13. Promote appropriate use and development of energy and mineral resources. See LWRP Section III - Policies; Pages 65 through 68 for evaluation criteria. Yes No ® Not Applicable PREPARED BY TITLECoastal Management Specialist DATEAu ust 7,2025 Robert E, ZW rRn'ann Amended on 811105 Received ASEAN R. MCCOYD 3360 MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD, SOUTHOLD ry/ 1 AUG r, o l / " I f �" 01 wl�� ��� it ✓ ��^ r r "„ �, b r I�F I o e,r f o, � ,,,+ �' r�l�.✓� ✓ � I��i,; �i�rirAf{/ J./�roi(f +y� ;. , r.N-1 o f ryll)�)(1���1��'r;�{/%' I!�/'nrF t/✓✓lmj U�f /,,, R ilc, ::.;. o ,r,:. x;. ' � ,. ,! i ,a /f2:� r '»'.. 1 4 rr � Ol ( is�✓i{� I r / ,,,,,'„ Qirr�arrg! ;i°,' {.. ✓;,,,, g a i flaw,,.: ,.. .ra �...rrPr. " � ',,. „/r y�,., �,Ip Nrd6rJ�S�jF r: a„r,nr„ / j;: ✓ ,✓ d:. G, /: //J J ,,,,,.., J r ✓✓,� o c„ ,,,w� ,,, �i � � ,� ,rh,1. Gr, /U�) 1 r,��f ,,,� ,,:r f.J/� 9✓ r,Jf�xi ��', ,'� �u r �`,.... ,r,,,- ," 1 ,.,, ri" ,,, r {,,.. ,r "�,,,,,r.y ✓,: 1 ",� �o rrl� a I,� Jli'1 �'.. r✓,i, r „w. �, /1 y,,.",✓,f. ��r,.,a ,,, ra, �i�., .,� '� e r ,,.,,,. r, ,` �✓ , . r. r f tr 1� � ✓�fl4/,, ,.. ,✓ e,,.,„ ..r w;c//>f��l�r�Nll�%'f���(',�'rm;✓, ru 7r i //„ d�°/ri✓ wi.fflrr!.��� r ,,.0 i ,f�/�, l; ri ("� � �` - "�u n'-l. f/ly l� r✓ r/�,, �� �,���,,r�,; /�x„ � o l ,� i , � ��l r` f °'" � %. ;. (/f � �A��9�r"41!�,°' �i����e��r�r��,'�,! lrr •.�I r , io �a Figu re 1 Looking southwestfrom Cor ey Creek at existing ]-sty dwelling with attached garag e to be demolished and replaced with new I &2-sty dwelling and accessory garage. J//i ✓i Ji /r/ ✓%1 rl / r�pi�JJ "''4W'M'A1!Ynro f J�1 �rf f J I t i V r � I Figure 2. Looking northwest from Minnehaha Boulevard at existing I-sty dwelling with attached garage to be demolished and replaced with new I & 2-sty dwelling and accessory garage. ;I r 4 --,--' TOWN S UTH L !` O ERTY RECORD CARD Q�I11= r 0C 4z STREET VILLAG �-- DISTRICT SUB. LOT r�a Q • FORMER OWNER, N E_ F r ACREAGE l ` gSt � f 9 � W TYPE _OF BUILDING REST SEAS. VL. FARM COMM, IND. CB. MISC. Est. Mkt. Value J LAND IMP. TOTAL DATE ( REMARKS 7 r 7 ve Jli Y % ; _ A b k - x . UIL JJNG COND T O ' _ -�. � #� � � '. !'t�P'f [ � a � NEW NORMAL BELOW ABOVE FRONTAGE ON WATER Farm Acre Value Per Acre Value ( FRONTAGE ON, ROAD 1 ' •1 Tillable 1 3 Doc L+_757D ��� i�y BULKHEAD } t _ z Tillable 2 DOCK j _ r Tillable I FVf�/6Jr�tf �`1 ' C Ti Cda! j _ /fY � - Woodland f t Swampland 1 )' ' <c m� d)e. cn Brushland „y House Plot <II O CD Total" f I \\ \m ME �\ IN \\\ � a L� a 87.-3-66.4 3/201Lkz J! r — Y _ 4 A Bldg. r Foundation Both t = a. Extension Basement Floors Extension �� Ext. Walls � interior Finish Extension Fire Place 1 Heat s � Porch I Roof( 'Type Porch i Rooms 1st Floor Bfeez-emmy- Patio Rooms 2nd Floor Garage i Driveway Ocrmer s�I — a rq-PO r r SCTM # 7/ q 3 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD PROPER J ARD OWNER STREET VILLAGE DIST. SUB, LOT 67 ACR. 71EARKS 1, TYPE OF BLD. PROP.CLAS§ 'p � vv LAND IMP, TOTAL DATE CD o� �^ c 3 © L i -. _.. r FRONTAGE ON WATER HOUSE/LOT i BULKHEAD TOTAL i