HomeMy WebLinkAboutSouthold 6 SEQRARESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Tow~x Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from([~ ~ ~, ~'cu ~-~ I ~% ~ :~-o ~, t Zoning
District Designation tothe( 'tO--~ / 1D.~_tTcf,~_ht'x',[ ~f-~rco Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTlVI~ 1000 - 5'~3-' - 2 -,~ ~ ~. ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when ;'Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for'the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
c)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated.
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and tkis proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS find[tags statemem; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from Q_~ ~ ~ ff-/~_J~ I i~..J ~ [ ..-._ ~3 Zoning
District Designation to th& ~ 1 ~*--~} ~.1[~'~, ~ [ 0 ?--~." c~ Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000 -- 3'-~~- - 2_~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
h)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action mee~s this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (,~ / ~.I~( [~ ,..~ :.~ ~..t Zoning
District Designation to the(~ P-e~,~ c¢-~_~J~-~ (. d- ~./_,c.~ Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 ~r-_~-- - 3r-_ ( (3 ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoningdesignationffom(.~'~ ~-?.~.~.( ~,--,3~.~ S5 Zoning
District Designation to the (. ~ ') 0-~-~; c123u~'~,'~( r~ -~_--~c_~ Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 -- ~-~'-- - ~-- ( ( ; and
WHEREAS the Toxxm Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et_
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "¢hanging
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoningdesignationfi-om(~3~ ~-~.~,~.~LO(, ¥'~-~;-~o .ti Zoning
District Designation tothe(,,J~.b ~ ~o~£'~c.~j~'~X~^~ 0F-~co... Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000- 5-~-~-- r2-:3.. ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRK 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
h)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, paring requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that tkis proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fromQ_¢~ (/~_~A.)Kfa-~, ~oJ"v~,.~-~Z Zoning
District Designation tothe L~-~::~ ~ l~e.~c~-h*~[ O~¢-'{c~ Zoning District
Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 -- _q¢ ~--- _~"-~ ~. ( ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GE]IS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as ~"~0~ ;'~-~"~[~ (~ ortho
County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion~.
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect thb combined totals of all the other
parcels in _~ ~ ~ ~,~__1 (o . The individual information for each
parcel is found in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2
are attached hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carded out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
2
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteria and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a)
b)
c)
d)
the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain er are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
3
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
~or
Southold 6
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
B to RO
North Road & Boisseau Avenue
Southold
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 7654501
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 4.62 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zoning is B and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has frontage
along North Road & Boissean Avenue, in the hamlet of Southold. Specific Suffolk County Tax
Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of
zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the
Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
Sou[hold 6 - EAF I
10/18/19~0 16:04 516-476-6~3B TWC GROUP INC PA~E 8~
Ptopert',/Ownera:
SC'TM#, Ow~r's.nnme and addrts,%
P/O (~5-2-~4~ F~:nk Fi~id Corp.. 4O Middlt~fl Road, GrttRpo~ N~ ] l~fd
055-2-~3
055-5-12.2
855-$-11
055-5-10
055-5-9.
Mnd¢lcino Schlaf~r c/o 1670 Hou.~, R~ute 48; Southold, NY'. 1197 ]
Donald Tul~ill z. Wife, 3150 Bois.v, eau Ave4 Southol~ 'NY. ! 1971
Joafln Rizzo,'p.o. ~ 6~6. Or~cflport, NY, ] ~944
Gebr~c l~nny IV ,~ Rob~ Bogcr, c/o Pcnny Lumber, P.O. Box 2067, Gm.port., NY,
1 i~,4
Pa~icia Miloski, P,O. Box 292, Sou&old, NY, 11971
,4. Site Description
Pl~ica/.se~Jn~ ofov~ll I~j~L'~ ~ d~ md ~.~.
I. P~ I~ ~:
AFTER COMPLETION
1.62 acres
WIMt is predo~inaflt soil typ~s,) on ~oj=t si'~'? Haven Loam [0-3% slopes] & Riverhead
Sandy Loam [0-3% slopes]
n. Soil drainag~ 100.00% WeU Drained
,4=
Are there bodrock ou~.roppin~,s on project ,itc?
a. Whnt is dq~ m bedrock?
NO
NA
Is project subsmntjtllly conti~ous to. or contain a building, s~tc or dis~ict, listed o~ thc S~tc or ~hc Nntiomd Rc~sl~
o/Hism~c P]af:~s7 NO
Is pmj~-t mUally ~ontiguous to fL ait~ lis~d on tho Rtgi.~r ofNntiomif Natuftl LandmmY, s?
NO
8. Wh~t is thc dc~ of~e w~ ~blc? 3F
goon~? SCDLIg 1990 Ormmdwn~' Maps and
·. USGS Ouadan~e she~u
9. Is site loosed over a primm-y, pfiflcip81, or sole Som~;~ mluifcrT
YES
Soathold 6 - EAF 2
10.
11.
12.
13-
14.
15.
16.
17.
Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presunfly exist in the project area?
Dons project site contain any species of plato or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered?
According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
Are there any unique natural land forms on thc project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
Describe:
NO
NO
NO
IS
19
Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recr~tion area?
If yes, explain:
Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community?.
However general character of the area has been identified as scenic.
Sm:ams within or contiguous to project aroa~
Name of S~'eam and name of River to which it is tributary:
Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
Name:
b. Size (In acres)
NO
NO
NO
YES
ls the site served by existiag public utilities?
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
YES
YES
NO
Is the site located in an agricultural disl~ict certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO
Has the site ever be~n used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
NO
B=
Project Description:
Physical dimansious and sonic of project
Note: As the proposed antion is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own moUon there is no
physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. More relevant
information can be found in Section C of this EAF_ Also please rofar to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
~. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: NA
b. Project acreage to be devaloped; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
c. Project a~reago to remain undeveloped: NA
d. Length ofprojant, in miles (if appwpriatu): NA
e. If thc project is an expansion, indicate percont of expansion pwposod: NA
f. Number of off-s~'eet parking space, s; Existing: NA Proposed: NA
Southold 6 - EAF
3
9.
10.
I1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
M~imum vohicolar trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA
If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
::':ly, I I I
Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed slxtinture? Height: Width: Length:
Linear feet of fi'outage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 1444'
How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site?
NA
Will disturbed areas be reclaimed?
a. frye& for what intended propose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation?
NA
NA
NA
NA
How many rog'res of vegetation (txecs, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site?
NA
Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA
If single phase project; Anticipated period of construction in months, (including demolition). NA
If multi-phased;
a_ Total number ofphasas anticipated (ratmber): NA
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolition). Month: Year:
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: Year;
d Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: ~ ]No: Ix]
Will blasting occur during consU'uction? NO
Number of lobs generated; during constractinn: NA; NA
Number of jobs eliminated by this project NA
Will pmjeat require relocation of any projects or fa~ilitias? NO
Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? NO
a. If yes, indieam type of waste (sewage, industrial, cte_) and amount:
b_ Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged:
Is subsurface liquid v~ste disposal involved? NO
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amoum:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
After project is complete:
Will surface area of an existing water body inerease or decrease by proposal?
Explain:
NO
Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
NO
Will the project generate solid waste?
If yes, what is the amount per month (in tons):
b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used?
NO
Southold 6 - EAF 4
d.
¢. If Yes, explain:
17. Will thc proj e~t involve the disposal of solid waste?
If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal (tons/month)?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides?
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)?
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding tho local ambient noise
21. Will project result in an inere~e in energy use
If yes, indicete type(s):
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minutg):
23. Total anticipated water usage per day (gallons/day):
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding?
Yes, explain:
- 25. Approvals Required.'
If yes, give name:
Will any wastes not go into a se'wage disposal sygcm or into a sanitary landfill?
City, Town, Village Board Yes X No Change of Zone
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes No X
City, Town Zoning Board Yes No X
City, County Health Department Yes No X
Other Local Agencies Yes No X
Other Regional Agencies Yes No X
Slate Agencies Yes No X
Federal Agencies Yes No X
Type
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NA
NO
Submittal
Date
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed aO. ion involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required?
zoning amendment ~ zoning variance
site plan new/revision of master plan
special use permit ~ subdivision
resource management plan other
2 What is the zoning classificetion(s) of the site? B
YES
Southold 6 - EAF 5
'4.
What is the maximum potential development of the sim ffdeveloped es permitted by thc present zoning?
60374 square feet of commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc.
Computation is baaed on a straight arithmetic computation ba~d on percent of lot coverage aa allowed in
the code. Ao~al yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential
yield.
What is the proposed zoning of the site?
RO
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed ~ permitted by the proposed zoning?
40249 square f~et of office/light commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage,
parking, etc. Computation is baaed on a stxaight arithmetic computation baaed on percent of lot coverage
aa allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield.
6. Is the proposed action consistent with thc recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
YES
What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classilications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action?
Land uses include: agricoltural, single-family residence, commercial- Zoning includes AC, R80,
R40, B, AHD.
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adloining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile?
YES
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land. how many lots are proposed? NA
a_ What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
NO
11.
Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
protcotion)? NO
~. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle proje~ed demand? NA
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic?
D. Informational Detail~
Plea.se refer to the Generic Environmental lmpaet Statement and l~indings Statement for the County Route
411 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold)_
Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my know[edge.
Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group
Signature:
Title:
I certi~ that tho information provided above is true to the best ormy knowledge.
ApplicanttSponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Consultants to the Town Board
Southold 6 - EAF 6
Ge-~eral Iniormation (Rea~C'-'re-~ullyj
~ne ~amol~ ~covid~ ar~ m .~sisz ~e ~eviewec ~v showln~ ~g~ c~ im~2~ ~nd wherever ~oss~ble
magni~de ~nac wouid M~ger ~ ~;onse in column 2. The &xampl~ zre gene~ily.~poffcebie drou~houz
for most situation& ~uc for zn~ s~ec~ffc ;raiec: or site o~er ~xamples and/or lower chreshold~ may be apprapru
The impac~ of e~c~ proi~ on eedn 5ire. in each ]ocaliw, will v~e~. Therefore. ~e ~ample~ are illus.-tOre
have b~ offe~ ~ ~idznc~ ~a~ do ncc c~d~ce an ~a~ve I~ of im~z~ and ubre~holds to an~er each que~dc
The number of ~pl~ ~er qu~don ca~ not indicate ~e imgo~c~ of eed~ qu~oon.
In [dend~in~ impact, cons/der lon~ :~, 5ho~ ~e~ ~d ~amla~ve
inst~ta.s ~ea~ ~full~
~ ~er ~A~q of the ~ qu~ion~ in PA~ Z Answer Y~ if ~em ,~11 be any impact
b. M~y~e ~e~ should be ~n~id~ ~ Yes
~. If ~sweHn~ Ye~ to z question ~en ~A ~e A~prcpdA[e bo~ (column I or ~ :o indicate ~e potential size of the
imDac~ if impa~ ~hoid ~u~s or ~:~d~ ~y ex.pie p~d~. ~ ~lumn Z If imDAct will occur buz
~. Ide~i~ing ~At ~ imp~ will be ~ctendAlly I~ge (c~lumn ~ da~ no~ m~ ~A[ it i3 ~]~o necessarily signifl~nL
Any large T~pA~ mu~ be e~uAt~ in PA~ 3 to det~ine si~nific~ce. Ide~/ing ~n imp~c: in ~lumn 2
e_ If ~ewer h~ doubt ~o~ s~ of ~e impact ~en ~n~d~ the impAc: ~ pe~endafly I~e and pro~ to PA~ 3.
L ff a ¢otenfi~ly I~ge impa~ ~h~ in colg~n 2 ~ be mifi~At~ by ch~g~) in ~e proje~ to ~ ~m~l to modeler
mu~ be ~(~ned in ~ ·
IMPACT ON LAND
i. Will me proposed ac-Jan re_ma/tin a physic2l cZnange ,.? t(n~?oie~=, site_~
Examples :fat would apply :o column 2 ~'~
· Any cons~ruc-don on slope~ of 15% or ~reace:. Ci5 fooc dse per 100
fooc of !eng,). or where :fe g-"'~'-*J slope~ in ',.he proie~ ~ea
10%.
· Consmac-Jon on land where de depda :o :fie water ~i:le is le.~
3 i~.
· C~n.~cruc~on of payed paa~king ~re~ ~or ~,000 or more vei~i~e&
· Cons~'uc"Jon an [~nd ~here be,'Jrad< is e:q:~se~ or ge~et~.lly wi~in
3 Ee~_' of exJ~dn~' ground
· Cortez'ut-Jan dAc will c~ndnue ior more :f~n 1 year or in~oiYe more
dan one pha~e ar
· ~.c~v~don for mining purposes :fac ,,vouirl ;emove more dan
~ons of natural mom.del (i.e_ mc~¢ or soi~ ~e~ yesr.
· Cons~'uc'don or ~za~msion o? · sa. nitT_ry !andfiiL
· Construc-'Jon in a de, ignored floodway
· Ocher imoac:~
1 2 ;3 .~.
Small to Potential .Can Imoac, 8c
Moderate L~r- ge Mitigated By
Impac: Impact Pro ec~ Chan¢
I~ ~ F~JYes I-]No
r-
!. Will t. here be an eff~ to any unique or unusual h. nc~ ~ found on
:fe sice.~ .ri e.. cliffs dunes, gealogic3! farm--rich.s, et~'9~ ~YEc
· ~oec-ffic !and ~o~s:
[MPA'CT ON WAT--R
iUnder Ardc!e_~ 15. 2~.. 25 or .:he ~n'.'ironmencz[ Consa~adan L~w. ~CLJ
~ '~YE5
Oredgin~ more ~an ~0~ cubic yards o~ mzcari~] ~rom ckanneJ c~ ~
E~tensian of udliw dis~budon f~cHibes ~rouEh a proce~ed w~er body
Cans~cdon [n ~ desi~na[ed ~reshwater or cid!l wedlnd_
Ocher impact:
Mcdera;e
Impac:
2 C~n
Pcten[i~l
im~ac; ~rcie~:'C,,a e
imy~ ENo
4_ Will proposed ac-Jan aftra= any non-prote~ed ~xbd?~. or~ew body
of wa~e;.~ ~ ~YE5
E.zam!Dle~ Lhat would a~DoIy to Column
L
· .A 10% [nc=~_se or de~-~e in ~e su~a~ area o~ any body of water
· Cansa~Jon of a body of water ~ ~c~ds 10 oozes
Fn ~y~ eno
[] ~Yes I~No
Will Proposed Ac-don a~e~'~ sur;ace or ~roundwate.'!~ /-D
quaiit'y or qoand~( ,/~'~0 ~¥~$
~ampI~ ~hat would appiy :o column 2 (
P~pos~ A~on will r~uire a discharge peril
have aa~roval
Propos~ A~on
gailons per minum ~m~ing ~a~.
P~oos~ A~on will adv~eiy affe~ g~un~ter.
do hoc ~t or M~ Mad~Ua~ ~a~.
~is~ng body a~
con~: ~ nam~ candi~an~.
?roOos~ A~on wii( ~im ~e r~mge of pe~leum or ~e~i~l
?romose~ A~an will Mlow ~Mendal us~ in area~ ~i~ouc wac~
~nd/or sewer sedco.
[]
[]
S. Will ;ra0osed ac'~on al~er drainage ilow or gal~ns.;r surface
E:amgle~ ~ac waedd ~o~i.v ca c~lumn 2
· ?ro0osed Ac'5~an would ~ange Hood w~Ce: flows.
?
2
Impact.
Can I~
MitJcja~ed -J~l
j Proiect Char::'
IMPACT ON AIR
Will proposed ac'Jan a~fec: air qualky~
E:arnple~ bha[ would a~piy co column 2
hour_
'~YE$
~,a$ ~n any ==iron
Proposcd .~,c:.~on wii! resuk in Se incJne_~don of mcre ~an I ten oF
refine per hour.
heal ~ource pradud~ mo~ ~n 10 million ~'s oer hour_
Prooos~ ac~on will ~llow an inc-e~e in ~e amount pi [and cammi~ed
~a /ndus~al use.
Propos~ action wiil aJlow ~n inc-e~e in ~e de~/~ of
development wi~hi~ ~i~[ i~d~al are]s_
O~her
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
WH[ ?m~osed Ac~om a~,'e~ any ~rezcen~ or enda~d
E:Amgles ~a: wouid ~y
· Reduction of one or more m~[~
lisL u[in~ ~ge site. over or ~ezr
·Removai of any oo~on of
· Appii~on o~ p~ddde or h~idde mare ~ ~ic~ · year, a~her
· O~er impa~
non~dan~e~ s~
~YES
IMPACT ON AGRICUL~RAL ~ND
,0. Will me.~pose~ A~on
E=~mpl~ :hat would ~o~ly 'o c=iumn ~ (
· T~e =roocs~ a~o. wc~id
G
QYe~
I--.' Yes I~No
{.'
I~yes r-~No
QYe$ ImNo
· Con$~:L:czion aczivic'/ would ~civa~e or cJr~pacz ~,e ~c[i
of ~[ric~itural I~nd or, i~ lace[ed in ~n A~ricuituczl Ois;~ more
th~n 2.5 a~-es e[ ~dcut~ral I~nd_
- The ?ogas~ ~Jon would dis~pc or proven[ ins~ll~don af ~gdc~i~r~[
[~nd man~geme~c ~tem~ [e.g.. ~ubsud~c~ drain [ine~. aude~ ditches.
szr[~ czo~pin~; or ~[e ~ ne~ for such me~sur~
Ntoce£~. [_=
2
Mi[!~a[ed Ev
?roiec: Change
IMFACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURC?F~
. WIll proposed zc'.Jon affe~ aesr. hed¢ r~our¢~?,
(lf n~s~, use ~e ~suzJ ~AF Addendum ~n
Append~ 8.)
Proposed land us~, or pmje~ compon~n~ obvio~iy different from
or in sha~ cannot :a ~Jnen~ su.~ounding I~d use pa~ms, whe~er
Proposed [~d ~. or pro[~ compon~n~ v{si~le
z~edc r~our¢~ whi~ will ellmina(e or si~niS~dy
enjoymen: of ~e ae~edc qualid~ af ~[ r~ourc~
Proje~ componenu ~Ac wiil F~u[t in h~e elimination er signdicAn:
screening pi scenic views kn~n :o be impa~[ ~ ~e ~e~
O~er ~mpa~J:
IMPACT ON HI~'T'ORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12_ Will Proposed Ac'Jan impac~ any sit~ or sl:ru~'.dre of~n'~:?'c, pre-
E~m.l~ that would appbl m co'u". ( .
· I:~opo.~-~ A,~on occurring wholly ~r p~ally within or ~ub_,-c~rd~ly
contJ§uou~ to a~y ~[i~ or~e I~ on ~e 5~ or'Na~ona[ Regret
oe h~c plac~
· Any imoa~ ~ ~ ~a~lo~l site or lo.ii b~ [o~ ~ ~e
· Prooo~ A~on wd[ oc~Jr in an ~z d~igna~ ~ ~qsi~ve
ar~na~iogic~J sic. on ~e HY~ ~ite
l-iym~ I--JNc
I'-';,y~ ~Nc
rm~c
i-:.y~ ~N~
iMPACT ON OPeN SPAC-'=- AND RECRE. A~CN
;3. Will Proposed ^c~on affec:_~ ~.e quandty or quality a~ -_xirdng ar
,~JL'U~'e ope.,1 $pa¢:e5 Or re¢:'~aHonal opporcunit~e~( ~
. E.zamples ',.hat would apply m column 2 //~0 OYES
· The permanent ~oreciosure of z future recreerJona[ dgparmnity.
· A .'naior re,Jul'Jan o( an open space impor'~.n: .:a ~e c=mmuni~F.
.~myes ["i,-4
E==mple5 chat would appiv co coiurnn!
· 2roposed Acdon ~o [cc~e w~n ~ge
· Prooosed Action will r~ult in z ~u~on in ~e quanue/o~ ~e resource?
· Prooosed Acc[on will result in z ~u~on i~ the qu~liut o¢ ;ge r~ource?
· Prooo~ed l. czion wii[ impacz the u~e. ~unczion or ~nioyment or
· C~her impa~:
..,_-.
L-_-r~ce
Can imgac;
Micic_~e£ ~y
:=roiec: Ch=~nc_.Z ,
"-J Yes !~'. No
IMPACT ON TRANSPQRTA~C}N
Alteration or present ~a~ems o~ movement'of peopie md/or ]oods_
Prooosed A~ion wmil resuiC in major ~c
Other im~zc~:
. ~ ' .'-.' ~ve~ reno
C~ iq ~ .-'es r~o
.--Y=~ .ZNo
c~ :he ?:c~csed A~icn~
EAAmp[es [~ac would ac~iy co c~iumn ~
f~c~iirF.
Oders will ccc;r routinely [more ;~n one hcur per
Procosed AczJon wd[ pr[auto oper~dn~ noise ~ceedin~ ~he
ambient noise levels for noise ou~ide of s~ur~_
Froposed A~Jon w[i[ remove n~cur~[ bsme~ ~a[ wculd
noise screen_
Obher impaq:
1
2
Lzrgs
~Yes
IMPACT ON PUB[JC HEALTH
~Y~S
~mpl~ bgat would z~ply to column 2
Proposed A~on may ~use z ~k of ~iosion cr r~Jease o[ hazardous
subs~nc~ (L~ oil. p~dd~. ~emic]b. ~diaoon.
~c:~dent or uose~ [endiVes. or ~e may be · ~nronic Iow level
discharge or ~mbsion.
~rcposed ,A~3on m~y r~ult in ~e bu~Al of "b~zrdous w~' in Any
5~crA~e f~cHid~ for one miiHon or more g~Hons
?:ocos~ ~on may resuit in ~e ~czvadon or o~e~ die,bArite
2.000 fee~ of ~ site ~ ~or ~e dbposAi of solid or h~rdous
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEiGHBORHOOD
19. W iH pro pose.'J ac"do n affec.-~ ~'le --~41~-~c-'=~- o f b-~e o-'d--'d n~ c ommu nity ~
· ~e 9~an~t ~lzdon a? ~e ~, ~n or ~llage in whi~q ~e
~rai~ ~ {a~ ~ [~ely m ~ by mare ~ 5%.
· ?ro~osed A~on will ma~c~ or el~inace ~bdn& ~cHides. r~re5
or ~e~ of his~dc [mpo~ ~ ~e ~mmuniw.
' Ceve~oomenc wii[ ~ce a ~and for zddi~onaI c~mmuniw semic~
i--~ ?:¥e5 i'-~tqO
I~ ~'~Ye~
90. [$ :,Mere. cr is ~e.,,'~ [ike.~¥ '~ ~.e. ~ubiic ::m_"cverr,,' re!aced a3 po[ent..ial zEve.'se environmental imc~.~).. ~-_.._v=:
~z>>->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->->- >->-~->->->->->->>.>.>.>. >.>.>->->.>_>_
_. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz~zzz....._ZZ~.Z_~zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzz
c c ~ c c.c m c c.c c.c,=c c,.c.c.c. ,o..c '=o.=.c..=~c.c= ~==:~.,_
io o o ~o ~ $ $ ~'~ ~ ~ -~-~-~ o-~-~
e e:~ e · e'o .c.c~o E
:~.- ,:c .... ~r~c) i;-:oio o,o--~ .~ .oo~n~- :~i .P-:-i-I
o.m (/) ~1 m'm m e O..L~.=- iE,cl~: ~,.~ I~ m $
="E E ._u c e'E c'~ ~ 'o o ,,.c=,~',-,'o '- c,= o.= -- o.0 c
...... poooo~ ~ ~
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
ooo.o.o,ooooo,oloo,o.o,o.o,oo=oo o o
.o~.o
'~~~'~ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
' g8 : : '8 888888888888888888888888888888888
,,~" = I ~ ; ~ ' , I : , ~ I , , , ..... , ............ ! · , '
~ ,~iEE!E,E'E!E'E~' E'EiE:E E!E!E: :E, ' E'E E E E E E'E E:~'E'E E
ooooooooo~ooooooooooooooog~g
ooooooooo ooooooooooooooo~
ddd'dd'd:d~d~d'dddddddd'ddddddoo oo
ooooooooo~oooooo~oooooooooo~
0
.~!o~o~ooooooooo~ooo~oooo-oooooo~oo
~. o.~. ~.. o o~- o ~.
o oo o ~5 ~ c~ ~-
~.oOoooO~)C)o
~ q q o. q .0..q ,q o. q
000000000000~0000000~0000 000
qqqqqqqqq,q,qqqq.qqqqqqqqqqq ooo
O0000mm~OOOOmmmmmmmO000'O000'oooooooo oo~00
,,: ....... .- .... ~ ....... ........ ~~.~:~:~.~o~o. ,o
.~=88,8,88!8,8~888818888,888=====:=.,=:=======.='=.==,-:~'=
O0
000000000000000000000000~ O0
000
000
'~ ...... ~-~'~boo'oooooooO'Oo
000, 00000000000000000
o
o'0ooooooooo0o0oooo~'0~'-~'~'~'
~0000000000000~0000000000000000000000~000
~mddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd'ddddddddddd
............... ~'~ ............. ~ ......
~~ oo:oo o o o,o ' o o o o o o o o o o o .......
O0000oOO~O00~zzzzzz
0000000000000
' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ' i ~ o.o o o o o o o'o ~ o o
qq~qqqqqqq
0000000000000000000000000000 ~0
0
d oo ddd
o~oooOo0o~'~OoOOooo0ooooooo00oooOooooooo
0000000000000