HomeMy WebLinkAboutSouthold 5B SEQRARESOLUTION
W[-IEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENTclLA_L BUS[NESS Zoning District Designation to the
of a certain parcel of land
(RO) RESIDENTIAl, OFFICE Zoning District Designation
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM 1000 --
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as c~ompared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area,-areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 ~ ~--~"~ - ~ '- ~
; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said ;'no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be' it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have may significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi.om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM~IO00~- ~--q"- ~ ~_~ ~ oe~-3 ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
h)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the propo,sed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town ~oard nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefbre the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "SOUTHOLD 5B" of the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "SOUTHOLD 5B". The individual information for each parcel is found
in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the cdteda and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage~ building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corddor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteriaJthreshold; and
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
Southold 5B
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
B to RO
North Road & Youngs Avenue
Southold
~ Project Sponsor:
~ Town Board of the Town of Southold
:.-'~-P Southold Town Hall
~ 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 0.99 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zoning is B and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has frontage
along North Road & Youngs Avenue, in the hamlet of Southold. Specific Suffolk County Tax
Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of
zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the
Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
Southold 5B - EAF 1
Property Owners:
SCTM#,
055-5~2.3
055-5-~
055-5-5
Gary Rempe & wife, 3325 Youngs Avenue, Southold, NY, 11971
Linda Bertani & Others, Oakwood Drive, Southold, NY, 11971
Audrey Berglund, P.O. Box 1501, Southold, NY, 11971
A. Site Description
Physical se~ing of overall proj~cl, both developed and undeveloped
I. Pre,eot land use:
[~ Urban ~] lnduslrial [~] Commercial
~ Forest [~ Agriculture ~] Rural (non-Farm)
~-~ Residantial (suburban)
[--~ Other
Total acreage of psoject area: 0.99 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:
Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agricultmal)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, etc )
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvcgctatad (Rock, earth or fill)
Landscaping and/or Residential
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban
Other (indicate type) _
P~S~Y
0.99 acres 0.99 acres
AFTER COMPLETION
4
5.
What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Riverhead Sandy Loam 10-3% slopesl, Riverhead and Haven
Soils [Graded - 0-8% slopesI & Haven t,oam 10-3% slopesI
a. Soil drainage: 100.00% Well Drained
Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? NO
a. What is depth to bedrock? NA
Approximate percentage ofpropesed project with slopes:
0-10% 100.00 %
10-15%
15% or greater %
Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or district. listed on thc State or the National Registers
of Historic Places? NO
8.
9.
Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmark~?
What is thc depth of thc water table? 35' - 40' Source?
Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?.
Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?
NO
SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and
USGS Quadangle sheets
YES
NO
Southold 5B - EAF 2
11.
12.
Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered?
According to: Cromer Consulting Group and Town o1' Southold Planning Staff.
Idanti~ eat:h specias:
Are th~re any unique natural land forma on the project site? (i_e. cliffs, dunas, other geological formations)
Describe:
NO
NO
13
14.
15.
16.
Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
If yas, explain:
Does the present site include secoic views know to be important to the community?.
However general character of the area has been identified as scenic.
Streams within or contiguous to project area:
Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tribetary:
Lakes, ponds, wetland ~ within or contiguous to project area:
a, Name:
b. Size (In acres)
NO
NO
NO
NO
17.
18
19
20.
ls the site served by existing public utilities7
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) lfYas, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
YES
YES
NO
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
Is the site located in or substa.ntiaily contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area desigua~t pursuant to Article 8 of the
ECL, and 6 lqYCRR 6177 NO
Has thc site ever been used for thc disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
NO
Project Description:
Physical dimensaons and scale of project
Note: )cs the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no
physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. Moro relevant
information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
and Finding~ Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
Tolal contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor: NA
Project acreage to be developed; initially: NA Ultimately: NA
Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA
Length of project, in miles (if appropriate): NA
It~ tho project is an ~xpeasion, indiea~ per,ut of expansion proposed: NA
Number of off-sl~et parking apan~; Exi~ng: NA Proposed: NA
M~ximum vehicular ~ips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA
Southold 5B - EAF 3
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
If residential: Number and type of housing units: NA
One Family Two Family Multiple Family
Initially I
Ultimately
Dimensions (in feet) of largest propo~xt sl~uctum? Height: Width:
Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?. 150'
Condominium
Length:
How much natural material (i_e., rock, earth, eta.) will he removed from the site?
NA
Will disturbed areas be reclaimed?
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b, Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation?
NA
NA
NA
NA
How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed fi.om site?
NA
Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be reanoved by this project? NA
If single phase project:; Anticipated period of conslmction in months, (including demolition).
If multi-phasud;
a. Total number of phases anticipated (number):
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolition). Month:
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month:
d Is phase 1 Functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes:
Will blasting occur during construction?
Number of lobs generated; during consn~etion: NA;
Number of jobs eliminated by this pmjact
Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
Is surface liquid waste dispoml involved?
a. If yes, indicate ~ of waste (s~tage~ indns~al, ere,) and amount:
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged:
Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved?
ffyes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
Year:
At'ret project is complete:
NA
NA
NO
NA
NA
NO
NO
NO
Will sun*are area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain:
NO
Is project or any portion of projeet located in a 100 year flood plain?
NO
Will the peoj~t generate solid waste?
If yes, what is the amount per month (in tuns):
b. If yes. will an existing solid w'aste fm:ility be used?
c. If yes, give name:
NO
Southold 5B - EAF 4
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
¢. IfYc~ axplain:
17. Will the project involve the disposal ef solid wa_qc?
If yc~ wha~ is the anticipated rote of disposal (tons/month)7
b. If yes, whmt is the antieipaI~t site life?
18. Will project use herbicides or pastieides?
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)?
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise
21. Will project result in an inere~e in energy use
If yes, indicate type(s):
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute):
23. Total anticipated water usage per day (gallons/day):
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal fimding?
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
City, Town, Village Board
City, Town, Village Planning Board
City, Town Zoning Board
City, County Health Department
Other Local Agencies
Other Regional Agancies
State Agencies
Federal Agencies
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Type
Change of Zone
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NA
NO
Submittal
Date
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Docs proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required*.
site plan new/revision of rooster plan
2. What is thc zoning clessification(s) of thc site7
special use permit ~ subdivision
B
YES
q Southold 5B - EAF 5
What is thc maximum potential developmcat of the site if developed a~ permitted by the present zoning9.
12937 square feet of commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc.
Compu~tion is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as allowed in
the code_ Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum potential
yield_
What is thc proposed zoning of the site? - RO
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed os permitted by the proposed zoning?
8625 square feet of office/light commercial buildings. Est[mate does not figure muds, drainage,
parking, em. Computation is based on a might arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage
as allowed in the code_ Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield.
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
YES
What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial Zoniug includes AC, RS0,
R40, LB, B.
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile?
YES
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA
What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
NO
11.
Will the proposed action cr~xte a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, tim
protection)? NO
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
o. If yes, is the existing road net~vork adequate to handle the additional traffic?
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
411 Corridor Land Usc Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
E. Verification
1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group Date:
Signature:
Tide: Consultants to the Town Board
1 certify that the information pro~4ded above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Southold 5B - EAF 6
Generzi nformaion(Rald ,_areru!vl
magnitude chat would ~n~gef ! response ~n column 1_ The &xampt¢ are gene~i[y, zppiicabie chroughouz the State ~
for mo~t s~madon$. But. for ~ny $oe¢~f~c prefect or s~ce oCer a~mp[es afld/cr lower chre~hold~ may be approor{
~cr ~ Po~endM Large Impact r~panse. ~u~ requiring avalu~don in Pa~ 3.
TOe impala of e~ch pro]~_ on each $i~e. in each [o~IiW, ,MIl yaW. Therefore, ~e ~ample~ are ilJus~-Edve a
The aumEer of ~ple$ ~er qu~don do~ not indicate ~e im~o~c~ of azdl qu~don_
instr~c':.ions (Read o~.refuli'/J
a_ A~-wer e.~ch of ~e ~ que~iens in PA~ ~ Answer Y~ if the~ will be an7
b. Maybe ~ ~a~ld be ~nsi~ ~ Y~ ~e~
impac% If imca~ ~hold equ~s or execs ~y ex.pie p~ded, cb~ ~lumn ~ If impact will occur but
A~ I~ge im~a~ m~ ~ e~t~ in PA~ 3 (~ del~i~e si~nific~ [d~db~ing ~ impact ~ ~lumn 2 simply
~ ~&t it be I~k~ At ~e~.
e_ If re~ewe¢ h~ doubt ~ s~ ~f ~e impA~ ~en ~n~/der the imDAc: ~ pc~end~lly l~e And pro.ed to PA~
L If · ¢otenda~y I~ge im0~ ~h~ed in ~lumn 2 ~ be mitiqAt~ by ch~g~ i~ ~e ¢roie~ [~ ~ ~m~l to mode~te
img~¢~ ~o G~A ~e Y~s box in c~lumn 3. A No response in~i~te~ ~at ~h ~ redu~lofl is not possible.
mu~ be ~l~ned in P~ 3.
IMPACT ON LAND
~ 'YE~
~les ~t
Any c~ns~an on slop~ o~ 13% or g~ac~-, 05 foac dsm per 100
faoc of {~g~k ar whom ~e
C~on
] f~ of ~ni ~d su~c~
Con~on ~at ~[ ~nfinue ior mom ~ 1 ye~ or in.{ye mom
· an one ph~e
E~cavafion ior mining pu~as~ ~a~ would ;~ove mom ~n i.~
tons of nam~l mamdal
C~ns~on or ~g~ien of a sani~f i~diiiL
Cen--ken in · d~i~na~ ~o~ay_
Other imoac=
I 2 3
Sm~J[ to Potential .Can lmoac*.. 8
ModerAte L~r-- ge,~ Mitigated By
Impact Impact I Project Chang
2. Wile Ih, ere be an effect to any- unique or unusual land ~n'n,~iound on
~e site? ( .e. c!iffs, dunes. ~ o8 Cai fo~adc~. ~cc.)~ OYES
· So~!fic ~and Sa~
~Under .~FJdes 15.24. _%= gl :he [nvironmenc=-I Conser'/a[~r~l__,w. :-CL!
E~amole} :h~r would ~coiy rD c:[umn 2
Dredging more ~han I~ c=b[c v~rds of mi(~ri&/ ~¢om chznne[ cr ~
pro,et:ed s~reim.
E~;ension o~ udllbt db~budon ¢~cilid~ ~rough ~ pro(e~d w~[er body.
Cons%mcsion in a desi~at~ ~r~hwater or ddaI wetland.
O~her impact:
IMPACT ON WATE.--', ~,' Moderate
...... Y ...... = ........ J I ,rn, c ac:
Will proposed ac_ion arteC imf non-protec:ed ~xi~d¢..~ new body
of wated_ , ~NO ~YEi
~mgl~ ~zt would apply m crouton 2 [
.*. 10% inc~e or de~e ia ~e suvaco are~ oi znykbody of wa~ar
er more bhan a 10 a~ ino-e~e or deo-e~e.
O~er imo~
~. Will Proposed Ac'don a~ec-,:., suvaco or iroundwater 7
qu~.iiW or ~ua.ndw!~0
Exzmple¢ L,ha~ would appiy :o column Z
· .~roOosed Ac-Jan will r~uire a disdnarte pe~it
· ?rapo$~ .&~on ~uir~ use o~ ~ source of water uhat daes nec
have approval lo s~e 2ropos~ [proj~]
· Propos~ A~on r~ui~ wa~er sup0iy from wei[~ with iron,er ~an 45
~ailon: per minu~ ppm~in[
~u~¢ly ~em_
' Mquid e~lu~= will be ~ey~ o~ ~e si~ ~ f~alid~ waidn p~endy
do hoc ~ ~r M~ ~ad~ua~
· P~os~ A~on ~uld ~e ~ in ~r=ss o~ lO.~ gallo~
d~y.
· Pmpos~ A~on will lik~y ~ sil~fion or 0~ d~e
azi~dn~ body of ~mr ~ ~e ~t ~at ~e ~ll be ~ ob~o~ ~ual
· Prooosed A~en will ~im ~e ~e of pe~ieum or
pradu~ ~reacer ~an 1,1~
' ~ro;os~ A~on will allow ~idendal us~ in areas wi~out
· ?rouos~ Aaron !o~ c=mmerdai an~or indui~ai ~ which may
iacliities_
· Ob~er [moa~
w~_ter ~ano/f? ' _ ~O
E~mp[~ .:hat wa~ld ~.!~¢~iy m c¢[umn 2
· P.'coose~_' ACtion w~=uld ,~anle ~locd wai:et Flows.
7
sumac.-
[]
O
[]
2
7ct~ntial
Large
impact
,2
C
[]
[]
O
C
,m
~Ye_~
L~Y~
FroND
, 1
.,-'["~.S ma {c
2
Impact
Can Impac; ~a
Miti~atec
Project Char ~'
."----.'Nc
~Nc
IMPACT ON
Wifl pra¢:osed ~c'dcn
2rocosad A~Jon wiS[
hour_
L
Proposed ,4~cn will r~ul: in ~e indne~don of mcre ~an ~ can of
re~use per hour_
Embsicn race of to~/ can[aminan~ will ~ce~ 5 Jb~. per hour ar a
hen: source produdn~ mo~ ~n 1~ million B~'s per hour_
Proaos~ a~on will allow ~ inc~ in ~e amount of [and cammi~ed
ta indus~al use.
Other
IMPACT ON PL~,NTS AND ANIMALS
· ]"N'~i[ ,:roaased Ac-J~on a~f~ any ~rea~n~ ar
.
Ezamgle~ ~ac wouid ~pJy ~ c:[umn I /
~educdon of one cr more Sp~i~ [i~ on bhe ~w To& or F~e~l
[is~ using ;he site. ~er or near s~e or ~ound on ~he ~ite.
· aemovai of any po~on of a m~l er si~ifican~ wiidlife ha~i~
· Appii~on of p~de or he~i~de more ~ ~ica z yeac o~her
· an for a~l~
· O~er im~
9. ~[I Prapos~ A~on m~ily
non~ndange~ s~ ~ ~YES
~amDl~ ~aC would apoly to calumn 2 /
· ProDos~ Ac~on ~uid sub~ngaily
mi~ralo~ iish, shei[fish ar wildlife
oF matra for~: (aver I~ 'iaaa :f i~el ar o~er [ac~ly impa~an~
IMPACT ON AGR[CUL~RAL ~ND R~QURCE~
;0. Will ~e ?~aos~ A~an ~ff~ ~;i~rai [and ~c~
~YES
Examal~ chat wauld ap~ly :o column ] ~' ~
- The ;raccs~ imJon woui4~ s~er. c-== ar
~and ]~nc~u~es :mcianc. haviie~. Dastard. vineva~, or~aa~.
F~y~ I~Na
:'-'~ Yes L_No
z§ricuitur~J [and
oF ~§ric-'itural land or, i~ located in :-n .&~ric'~itucz[ Gis~-~c-~
~han 2.5 ac;e~ o~ agricultural land.
The propo5~ z~on would dis~p~ or prevea~ in~lladon o~ a~ncui~[
[and managem~qt ~tems (~g_. ~ub~u~ac~ drain lines, oufle~
scrip c:~cging]; or ~-ea~e a ne~ ?or ~uch mea~ur~ (~g.
field co drain paady due ta in~a~ed'mnaffg
O'~er impaq:
r~
2
C
Miiio_ a~Q ay
.=rc/ec: Char, ga
L~Yes r'-
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES .,,..~
. Will proposed zc~on afro-c:_, aesdaedc m-~ourc~;~
(If ne.c~sary, use r.,Se ~,r~UaJ EAF Addendum in ~k_ec'~cn
ApDendix P,.]
~mpl~ ~at would apply ~ c~lumn 2
Proposed [and us~. er pmje~ componen~ obvio~iy
or in sha~ con~t to ~J~en~ su~unding J~d ult Do.ams. whe~er
man~ade or
Propos~ land ~. ~r ~roi~ component, visible
a~edc r~ourc~ which will elimina(e or silni~qdy ~ucs ~e~r
en~oymen~ of ~e z~edc qual[~ o~ ~a~ r~curcs.
Proie~ camponeno ~at '~H ;~ult ~n ~e e[imina~on cr
screeging of scenic vie~ kn~n co be imoomt ~
O~er imoa~:
~Nc
l-~Nc
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL
12_ Will ,~ropo~ed Ac-don irnoa~ ~ny site or
hi~nc or pal~n~lagiol
~mpl~ ~t would app~ ~ ~lumn 2 . /
of h~dc pla~.
· Any imp~ ~ ~ ~(o~1 s~e er fossil b~
proj~ ~it~
· Ptoaos~ A~on will oc:~r ia an ~
archa~ia~ic~ sick. on ~e NYS ~ite
Q
f~y~
IMPACT ON OP[N SPACE AND RECREATICN
13 ',viii P.'=pased ^c~ion &~ec~.~ ',he quandw or qual~/ of ~_xi~dng or
,~tu~ open ~ac~ or rmafionaJ oppormnifies~ 'k,,,~
· . Examples ',hat would a.p~ly ~ column 2 I~NO ~YES
The permanent foreclosure of · future ~ezdon~l
9
,~Yes
· ?:6oosed Action (o
' Prooosed A~ion will ¢ecult in a ~u~on in bPe qualiut o¢ abe r~ource~
· 2rooosed Action wiil ~m0a¢ the use, ~uncdon or en~ovmen( 0¢ ~he
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTA~ON
~YES
~=amgle~ ~at wouid !oaiv (o column ~
Alteraoon o? pre~enc palms o? mordent o~ ~pie ~dlo~ goods.
Proposed A~ion wii[ resuic in maior ~c ~robie~-
Other impac=:
'-= .'.~' Yes L'-No
i'~ ?Yes ENo
[] C' ."~s
IMPACT ON ~NERG'(
~6 '.,viii ;roeoseo acden a~ec: :he cgmmuni~'~ ~,
~au ~i ~eJ :r
E:am~l~ chic -~ouid ~ooiv :o column i
NCI.SG/~"~ (]P-OR I,MPACT~
o~ :he Proposed Ac=ion?
~;~pies" ' -
Oders wi[[ oc~zr rou6ne~y [more ~nan one hour per day}_
P:opose~ AczJo~ wi[[ produc~ coer~dng noise ~ce~d~n~ bhe [ocz(
ambient noise leveb ¢or noise ouoide of
[mpac:
2
EYes ~-~c
g~Yes LJNo
IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH
18. Will Proposed A~Jon e~e~ I=obiic he~l~
/~]NO F~YE5
. ~2mpI~ ~ would a~ply to column !
· Proposed A~on may ~u~e z ds~ of ~plcs~on cr relea~ of h~rdous
~ubs~nc~ ~.! o~[. p~ddd~. ~emiczis. ~diadom e~) i~ ~e e~en~ of
~cc~dent or upse~ condi~o~, or ~e~e may be ~ ~ronic Iow level
disease or
· ~oposed A~o~ may r~ult ~n ~e b~il o~ "h~dous w~z~' ~n Any
· ~cc~ge ~dlim~ for one miilion or more gallons of [iquifi~
' ?yo;os~ ~Jon may r~uit in ~e ~czvadon or o~er dis~rb~nce
within 2,000 fe~t of ~ site ~ ~or ~e dbposzi of solid or h~zrdous
· Other
~Y~
I~Y~ l'qNo
'~Ye~
IMPACT ON GROW-CH AND CHARACT, EA
OF COMMUNri~t' OR N~GHBORHQOO
] 9. Will propose'~ action aff~ ~e ~q~r o~ ~e ~omm~i~
~pl~ ~[ w~ld ~ply ~ ~iumn 2
· ~A pe~c ~pu~fian of ~e ~, ~n or ~llage in whi~q ~e
proi~ b Io~ ~ [iely ~ [~ by mom ~ 5%.
will in~e ~ mom ~ ~% p~ ye~ ~
· Progos~ A~on will ~lac~ or eliminate ~xbdng ~ac~liti~,
or ~re~ of ~is:o~c ~mao~ ~ ~e c=mmuni~A
· ~eve~o~menc will ~c~ · ~nd ~or zddi~an~J communi~ se~ic~
· Prc~os~ A~cn will ~e~ce or ~timin~ce ampicvmenc
· Ob~er im~a~
C
:0. Is :,~e:e. of' b ~e.~ likei¥ ~ ~.e, ;2ubiic c--nF.'CVerrf .-elated co pacenda[ ~,~ve.,'se ~_nvironmenca[
-t
~o~~zoz~o~
~ ' -'~' '~'~ ...... ~ ~"~'"-~-'-~ ~'~'o~ ~ ~o~
00000~000000000000000000000000000000000000 O0
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.zzzzOzzzzzzzzzzzzzOzzzzzzz
l~[[ .... ll~ll~[ll[llil~llll ...... ~ ........
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
,oooo~m~oOoo ................................
.~ ,:~EEEE:E:EE:~ :EEEiE, i .;EiEE: E EEEE'E'
~ m m ............. m m ........ m m m m.-.~.~ m m-~ m m ml~k.~l~.~ m ml~.~.~kZZ.~.k
ZZZZZZZZZ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ~ZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZOZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
______ .......... E.E:E~E.E,E E E.E E E E E E ..... E_
~mmmmmmmmmmmm~mm~O0000000 ~00000~==0
~ r~
__
0000
e~o o o oo o o o o o o o,oo~oo.oo o ooo o o oo o o~ oo oo o oo o
~1 q~. ~'~ 0 O~-
d oo c~ d
O0 0 00000000000 0000 O0 000
6 d d ~ ~ r,i d d d N d d d d r,,i d d d d ,-~ d d d d ~ N ~ ,-~ d r,i ,-~ d d N d ,: d ,-~ ,-~ c,i ~ d
000~ O0000m~m~mm~O0000000ooooo0000000~O~
~o
000
000
0'o ~0"
0 O'
o 'c~
>'>[~:m m '> > >'> > > >'>'>'> ~'~i~'> >I> > >'>:> ~
~ ~,oo ,o o~o,o.o ~ ~,o,o o o o o,o.o ,~ ~ o.o o o o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. : ' ,OiO'OiOrO,O,O,{ .0 0.0;0 0'0 0 ~~ ~'j j ~ j ~ ~
O00000000000Z~ZZZZZ>Z>ZZZZZZZZO0000000~
00000 O0 O0 O00
mmmmm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm~m~ ~
........................... ~qq~q
0
0