HomeMy WebLinkAboutSouthold 5A SEQRARESOLUTION
WHEP,_EAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
of a certain parcel of land
(LB)' LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
scm ooo - ff - { -l{. (
; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that tiffs action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617. I et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, treffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuam to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(LB) LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000 - _K-~-- ('- ('?.o~
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commeroial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a)
b)
c)
d)
the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traft-~c, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi.om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(LB) LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM#1000 -~-k'--- (~ [(~ ~ ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
histodcel area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold~ and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLXrED by the Town Board that ti'ds proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA roles and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(LB) LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 - ~C-3'-- / ~ Fl_ cfi ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation m the
(LB) LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold idenfffied by
scm# 10o0 - 5-X-- 2.3.
; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a eommeroial zone shall not require further SEORA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(LB) LIMITED BUS1NESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 "' ~--.ff"- - ~--~-,2. air ;and
WHEREAS the Town Board fotmd that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617. i et.
seq and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Towrt Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GElS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the
zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the
(LB) LIMITED BUSINESS Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land
lying in the Town of Southold identified by
SCTM# 1000 - ~-~-- - _f--- Q ; and
WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved
agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is
an Unlisted Action; ail pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et.
seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and
WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing
the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial
zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an
industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area,
drainage, and setbacks, or
c)
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
d)
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in
addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further
RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant
adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations.
The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the
specific parcels for the group known as "SOUTHOLD 5A" of the County Route
48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion".
The attached LEAF is identical for each parcel except for the following
information:
Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage
Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage
Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site
These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other
parcels in "SOUTHOLD 5A". The individual information for each parcel is found
in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached
hereto and incorporated by reference.)
A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study.
The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by
reference.
In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, criteria and
thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is
required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the
(County Route 48 Corridor) Land Use Study. These criteria and thresholds state
when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the cdteria and thresholds
established is the following:
"1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the
industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family
residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review
"2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density
residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation
Zone shall not require further SEQRA review."
3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to
another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial
zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further
SEQRA review if:
a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent
with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or
b)
the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of
the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot
coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area.
drainage, and setbacks, or
the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated
historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to
groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal
wetlands, or
the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48
Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of
Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and
Town of Southold
Long
Environmental Assessment Form
fOr
Southold 5A
Proposed Change of Zone
on
Town Board's Own Motion
B to LB
North Road & Youngs Avenue
Southold
Project Sponsor:
Town Board of the Town of Southold
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
Contact Person:
Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk
Southold Town Hall
53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971
(516) 765-1801
Project Description:
The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 13.31 acres of land in the Town of
Southold. The existing zoning is B and the proposed zoning is LB. The action has frontage
along North Road & Youngs Avenue, in the hamlet o£ Southold. Specific Suffolk County Tax
Map Nurabers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of
zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the
Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study.
Southold 5A - EAF
Property Owners:
SCTM#,
055-1-11.1
055-1-11.2
055-1-11.3
055-1-11-4
055-5-2.2
055-5-2.4
055-5-6
Owner's name and address.
Edward Dart, Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY, 11958
Edward Dart, Peconi¢ Lane, Peconi¢, NY, 11958
Edward Dart, Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY, I 1958
Edward Dart, Peconic Lane, Peconic, NY, 11958
William P6nnTlll~2200 Hobart Road, Southold, NY, 11971
601 Albany Ave. Corp., 100 North Center Street, Newton Falls, OH, 444~.-1321
John Satkoski & Pdta Patricia, 168 Fifth S~xeet, Greenport, NY, 11944
A~ Site Description
Physical s~tfing of overall proje~, both d~wloped and ~md~wteped areas_
I. Present land use:
[~ Urban [~ Induxlrial ~ Commercial ' [~ R~idential (suburban)
[~ Forest [~ Agriculture [~ RtwaJ (non-farm) ~ Other vacant
Total acreage of prejact area: 13.31 acres
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE:
Meadow or Bmshland CNon-Agricultmal)
Forested
Agricultural (Includes orchards, crepland., pest~, etc.)
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
Unvegctated (Rock, earth or fill)
Landscaping and/or Residential
RoMs, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban
Other (indicate type)
PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
4.41 acres 4.41 acres
3.17 acres 3.17 acres
3.75 acres 3.75 acres
0.75 acres 0.75 acres
1.23 acres 1.23 acres
Wha~ is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Riverhead Sandy Loam [0-3% slopes],
Riverhead and Haven Soils [Graded - 0-8%
slopesl & Haven Loam [0-3% slopes]
: 'a. ' Soil drainage: 100.00°/0 Well Drained
Are there bedrock ou~roppings on project site?
What is depth to bedrock?
NO
NA
Approximate percentage of proposed project with slopes:
0-10% 100.00 %
10-15% %
15% or greater
Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site or dist~'iet, listed on the State or the National Registers
of Historic Places? NO
7. Is project subslantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of Netional Natural Landmarks? NO
Southold 5A - EAF 2
15.
16.
17.
lg
1
19
20.
What is the depth of the water table*. 35~ - 40'
Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and
USGS Quadangle sheat~
Is site located over u primary, principal, or sole source aquifer'?_
YES
Do hurtling, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area*.
NO
Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered*.
According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff.
Identify each species:
NO
Are there any unique natural land toms on the project site*. (Lc. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO
Describe:
Is the project site presently used by the community or n~ighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
If yes, explain:
Does the pmscot site include scenic views know to he important to thc community?
However general character of the area has been identified as seanie.
Streams within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name of Stream and name of River m which it is tributary:
Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or c~ntiguous to project area:
Name:
b. Size (In acres)
NO
NO
NO
NO
Is the site served by existing public utilities?
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection?
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection?
YES
YES
NO
Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section
303 and 304? NO
Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 oftbe
ECL, and 6 NYCP,.R 6177 NO
Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes?
NO
Project Description:
Physical dimensions and scale of project
Note: As the proposed action is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own motion them is no
physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions are not applicable in this section. Mom relevant
information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Cmxidor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold)_
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsen NA
b. Project acreage to he developed; initially: NA UIfimatoly: NA
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA
Southold 5A - EAF 3
9-
10.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Length of projcot, in miles (if appropriate): NA
If the project is an expansion, indicate I~rcant of expansion proposed: NA
Numl:~r of off-street parking specex; Existing: NA Proposed:
Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA
NA
If residco6ai: Number and typo of housing traits: NA
One Family Two Family Mulaple Family Conclom(nium
Initially
Ultimately
Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed stmntm'e? Height: Width: Length:
Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare proje~ will occupy is? 2463'
How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed fi.om the site?
NA
Will disturbed areas be rcclahnod?
a. If yes, for what intanded puq~oso is the site being reclaimed?
b_ Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
c. Will upper subs oil be stockpiled for reclamation?
NA
NA
NA
NA
How many anres of vegetation 0reea, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed fi.om site?
NA
Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this project? NA
If single phase project, Anticipated period of conslxuction in months, (including demolition).
If multi-phased;
~. Total number of phases anticipated (number):
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase, (including demolition). Month:
c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month:
d Is phase I functionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes:
Will blasting occur daring eonstmedon?
Numl~r of lobs ganerated; during construction:
Number of jobs eliminated by this projec/
Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
Is surface liquid waste disposal involved?
a. If yes, indieate typo of waste (sewage, indu~aqal, etc.) and amount:
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged:
Is subsurface liquid waste di~poaal involved?
a_ If yes, indicate t,jp¢ of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount:
b. If yes, indicate method of disposal:
At, er project is complete:
NA
NA
NO
NA
NA
NO
NO
NO
Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal?
Explain:
NO
Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain?
NO
Southold 5A - EAF 4
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21
22.
23.
24.
Will the project genera~ solid waste?
a_ If yea, what is the amount per month (in tons):
b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used?
e. If yea, give name:
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanimxy landfill7
e. If Yes, explain:
Will the project involve the disposal of solid was~?
If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal (tons/month)?
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life?
Will project use herbicides or pesticides?
Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per da3')?
Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise
Will project result in an increase in enargy use
If yes, indicate type(s):
If water supply is fi.om wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute):
Total anticipated water usage per day (gallons/day):
Does project involve Local, SLate or Federal funding?
Yes, explain:
25. Approvals Required.'
City, Town, Village Boa~d Yes
City, Town, Village Planning Board Yes
City, Town Zonlng Board Yes
City, County Health Depar'unent Yes
Other Local Agencies Yes
Other Regional Agencies Yes
State Agencies Yes
Federal Agencies Yes
X No Change of Zone
No X
No X
No X
No X
No X
No X
No X
Type
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NA
NO
Submittal
Date
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
If Yes, indicate decision required?
zoning amendment [~ zoning variance
site plan new/revision of master plan
spcaial usc permit ~ subctivision
resource management plan other
YES
Southold 5A - EAF 5
What is the zoning classification(s) of thc site? B
What is the maximum po~ntial development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
173936 square feet of commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc.
Computation is based on a sWaight arithmetic computation based on gercent of lot coverage as allowed in
the code. Actual yield under a detailed sim plan may be less. Estimate represen~ maxin~.qm.potential
yield.
What is the proposed zoning of the site?
LB
Wlmt is the maximum potential development of the site if developed/as permitted by the proposed zouing?_
115957 square feet of light commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking,
etc. ComPutation is based on a straight arithmetic computation based on percent of lot coverage as
allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represents maximum
potential yield.
the proposed action e.~nsis taut with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans7
YES
What are the predominant land nsc(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile radius of proposed action?
Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, commercial. Zoning includes AC, RS0,
R40, LB, B.
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a I/4 Rile?
YES
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? NA
What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts?
NO
Il.
Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire
protection)? NO
a_ If yes, is existing capacity sulliciant to handle projected demand? NA
12. Will the proposed a~tion result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? NO
a_ If yes, is the e~ciating road network adequate to handl~ ~e additional ttaffic?.
D. Informational Details
Please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route
48 Comdor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold).
Verification
I c. erfify that the information provided above is true to the beat of my knowledge.
Name of Preparer: Cramer Consulting Group
Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board
1 certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name: Date:
Signature: Title:
Southold 5A - EAF 6
magnitude ~c wouid ~g~f ! resconsa ~n colum~ 2. ~he ~xampl~ are gene~[Iy, appilclb[e ~rou~hou~ :he Scats ~
~cr ~ ?~cenaal L~r~e Impact ~onse_ ~us mqu/~n~ evaluation in P~ 3_
· The impaq4 of ez~h praj~ an e~c5 s/ce. in e~ lo~Jib/, will v~rr-. ~nerefore, ~e ~mples ~re illusa-~five ~
h~ve ~ offe~ ~ guidanc~ ~ney do nat card.ce ~n ~a~dve 1~ of impa~ ~nd bhr~hol~ ca an~er e~6fl qu~d<
· The number aF ~ples per qu~don ta~ not indicate ~e impolite af e~n qu~don_
· In idend~ing imp~. consider lon~ ~, sho~ ~e~ a~d ~jmladve ~ffe~.
Instruc-:Jons (Read carelully}
~..-~..¢we~' ~_sc~'l of :he 2n questions in PAh'~' 2. Answer Ye~ if there will be any_ impact
h. Msybe a~s~'ers should be c~nsidered ~-s Yes a. nswer~
c, If answering Yes to a question then c~'~eck the appropriate b~ (column I cr ~ ~o indicate ~e po~enu~l size ~f the
[mpacL If [mpA~ ~mshold ~u~s ar azc~s ~y ex, pie p~d~. ch~k ~lumn ~ [f impact will actor ~ut
d_ Ideflti~ing ~t ~ imp~ will be potentially [~e (column ~ do~ no~ m~ ~t it [5 also necessarily
Any large impa~ mu~ be ev~uAted in PA~ 3 ~o det~ine si~nifi~ca. Identifying An impAc: M ~[umn 2 simply
as~ ~at it be [~k~ ~
e. Jf ;e~ewe~ h~ doubt ~o~ s~ of the impA~ ~en consider ~e imaA~ ~ ~[endaliy I~e ~d pro.ed ~o PA~ 3`
L [f A.~at~t~y [~e imga~ ~h~ed in ~Jumn 2 ~ be mitiGAt~ by ch~g~s) in ~e proje~ to A sm~[ to m~de~Ate
impac~ ~ ~ ~e Yes box in column 3` A No response indi~tes that ~h A r~uctien i~ nat p~ssibie.
mu.~ be axpla/ned in ~ 3_
IMPACT ON LAND
Will ~e proposed ac'Jan result ?n a physic~i c~naoge ~ d~roiezz_. 5i~.~.
~amples ~at wa~ld apply :o c~tumn
Any cons~on on sJoo~ of 15% or greece,. ~5 foot ~e per 100
C~on of pa~ p~g ~a ~or 1,~ ar mo~ v~id~
Con~on ~c ~fl ~n~nue for ma~
~an o~ ph~e or ~g~
~:cavadon for mining pu~os~ ~ac would :emove mo~ ~an ~,G~
:ohs oi na~l ma~ai ~.~. ~c ar soi~ ~e~ year.
C~ns~on or ~O~ion oi a sani~ ]~ndfiil.
Cons~on in a ~igna~ tic--ay.
Other imoac~
£
I 2 3
Sm,~ll to Potential .Can Impac: B,
Mcderate L~r= ge~ ,Vi[tigated By
impact [mpacZ
Project
Ch~n~
2. Will t,he:e ~3e an effe~ to any unique or unusuzl l~.nd f~.r~r~ iouncl on
~e site.~ ti e.. c!iffs dunes. 8eolog cai iotrnadens.
· 5oec!iie ~and ion'ns:
IMPAC? ON WAT--_R
~Uncar .~fc~e~ :5. 2~. ]~ OE :he Environmental Can~an~adcn Liw.
Ored~ing more ah~n ~O0 ~bic yards cf m~ca-~l ~rom c:~annei c~ a
[nen~io~ of udllw db~ibution fadiid~ ~reush a ~rote~ed w~ter body
Cnns~c~o= [na desi[nated ~r~hwacer or ~dal wedand_
OCher impact:
,Mode.
Impac:
C~." Yes k~Na
[~ I~ 'v~¢ ~No
4. Wiil proposed a~on affe~ any non-prote~ad ~xi~ -. ~:~_j~ new body
of water.~ , '~O ~YE5
~mol~ ~at wouid aaolv to crouton 2
· A 90% [nc~ or delete in ~e su~ac~ are~ of any body of water
· Cons~on of ~ b~y o~ w~[~ ~a~ ~c~s la ~c;~s o~ s~ac~ are~.
OYe~ ~o
will Proposed Action affecz su~ace or groundwater~,~
quaiit~ or qu~ ~NO
~ampl~ ~hat would appiy :o column 2
ProDosed A~on wii] r~uire z dbd~arge
have approval :o s~e praoosed [prcj~4 ~Jon.
Propo~ A~on ~ui~ water suppiy f~m weils with ]rooter ~an 45
gmilon~ per miriam pumping ~ad~l.
P~Oosed A~o~ will adv~eiy ~
Uq~id ~fflue~t will ~ ~eyM of 8e site m fa~ii~ whid~ pr~endy
Pr~os~ A~ ~uld ~e ~ in ~ a~ 20,~ gallo~
d~v.
Pm~s~ A~on will ~y ~e sil~don or 0~ d~e in~ an
~isdn8 b~V of w~r m ~e ~mt ~ac ~e ~11 be ~ ob~o~ ~suai
?rooosed A~en will ~im ~e ~omge of ~e~leum or ~emi~l
~rodu~ greater ~an 1,lOO ~llons.
?ro~os~ A~n will ~low ~idendzl us~ in areas wi~ouc
?rooos~ At,on [o~ c:mmer~ai an~er indusmai ~ whi~ may
facilities.
O~Ser
fi. Will_:rooos~. m~on altar drayage fl~ ar ~ame~ ar
~mpl~ ~c '~o~ ~DDJ? ~ c=lumn 2
7:o~os~ A~on would ~an~e flood water fl~s.
0
O
[]
[] C~¥es •No
[] imy~ rn~o
im 0¥~ r-,~o
- 2rooosed AcZion -*vi[[ allow deve!oo!=enc in a de_Ci~naced floodway
7. 'Nil[ proposed ~c-don tffec: ~ir quzlky? ~ ~YES
Ezampl~ ~gar Would ~ppiy to c~lumn 2
hour_
r~use per hour_
~o [ndu~al
2ropos~ action w/il zilaw an ince~e in ~e densiW a~ indu~fiai
development ~i~9in ~xi~n8 [nd~a~
Othe~ i~pa~:
E~mol~ ~at would ~iy m caiumn 2
· teduc~on o{ one ar ~ore ~p~ [~ on ~e
lis~ usinQ ~e sit~. over or ne~ ske or ~ound
· Remo~J of [ny po~on of ~ ~fi~l or sisni~ic~t wiidEfe habi~
· Appii~an of ~d~de or he~idde more ~ ~ica
·an for a~i~ pu~s~.
· O~r impa~
non~ndanee~ ~I ~ ~YE5
· ?rooos~ A~on ~uid ~ub~nda[IY incede~ wi~ ~any r~idenc or
migra:o~ ~ish, sheJlfish or wildlife
~f mature for~: love, 100 yea~ cf ~ge) o~ o~er [oc~ly impo~c
IMPACT ON AGRICUL~R~L ~HD
~0. Will the ?~pos~ A~on affe~ zg~cJi~rai land ~rc~
· E=~mol~ ~h~c would a~olv :o ~lumn 2 /
]and includes :~cianc. :~avfietc~. ~as~re..4nepal.
0
2
Large
Cea Impacl E£
Miti~a[ed
Projec: Char[
~Yes
EYes ~No
m~yes
E]No
~Y~ ENo
I~Yes I~No
I'-~yes I--;No
m~yes ImNo
L_No
· Const;acz!an acnvic/ wauid e~.civa:~ or compac'_
agric'4kural
cF agr{cuJtur~l land ar, if !o~ced in an Agricultural Cisai~ mare
t,han 2.5 ac;es of ~gdcul~[ [and.
· The propas~ acJon would disrupt or p/event ins~iladon of
land mana[emen[ ~stems (e_~.. subsu~ac~ drain lines, oude~ dkche:.
s~rip c;o~pin~); or ~ice a
field ~o drain poorly due Ia
- O'S, er impact:
1.2-..'
2
,''Yes r-q
~'Yes !-2No
IMPACT ON AESTHE'T[C RESOURCES
1'1. Will proposed acdon
(if nec~san/, use ~e ~f~ual EAF Addendum in~n &~7.20.
Appendix B.)
Es:ample:? ~hat would ~.OP[Y :o column Z
· Proposed land u. ses. or proiec',:, components o~vioc.~sl'y diffe_~nc from
or in sharp cone"asr to current su.n'~undin§ land use ~a,xa..'ns. whe~er
man. made o¢ natural.
· Proposed land ufe~. ar
aesthetic ,-esourc~ which will eJiminaCe or signi~ ~candy ,'-educe ',.heir
enioyment of :...he aes--,.heac qualifies oi: ~"ia[ resoorc~
· Proie-~, componen~ ~hat will ~esult in hhe elimination ar sign[ficzn~
screening of scenic views knc~n lo be im~or~_n~ :o the are:-_
· O~her
~y~ I-iNa
?']Yes
· "~ Y~ ~No
~'fes
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL R~C)URCES
12_ Will Proposed Ac;ion impa~ any site or
has.dc or pal~ntol~i~l impo~ca] ~0
~mpl~ ~C would app~ ~ column l
~pos~ A~on o~nl ~lly ar p~ail? wigan 6r
con~o~ ~ ~y ~dli~ or~e [~ on ~e
of h~dc pla~
Any impam m ~ ~qa~la~l site ar fassii
Pro~os~ A~an will oc~r ia an ~ d~i~na~ ~ s~si~ve far
ar~na~lo~icai sk~. aa ~e NYS Site I~q~_
C~her imoa~-
IMPACT ON OPeN SPACE AND RECRD-A~ON
13 Will ?.'oposed ^c~on &ffe~_~ ~e quandW or qualiw ai ~ng or
~u~e open spac~ or r~adon~l oppo~ni~i ~
. ~ampl~ ~at wou~d apply m column I ~0 ~YES
' The permanent ~or~asure o~ z ~umre ~maaonzl ap~o~iW
' A m~ior ~umJan a~ ~ cgen ~pan~ ~mao~nc ~ ~e ~mmuni~/_
· O~er imoa~:
9
l-lyes
I-;yes ~Nc
,re, yes~Nc
im.y~ I-:Nc
'~Yes I-~N
?Yes .'.~N
suodivis~on 8 ,~YC.RR 5~;-.~Z(g) ¢ O.(q? -'~YSS
List the environmental ch~r~c~er~cJcs ~ha[ czuseg :he d~i~nacian o(
the C~A.
[MPACT ON T'RANSPC]RTA~ON
;5. '/viii ;here be an eff'e_~ to 5",[is;Jng ~-ansoo~adon ~em~ _
Alteration of present ~ax~s of movement of p~pie ~dlor ioo~_
Proposed A~ion will ~suic in maior ~c Drablems.
Other impact:
r~
'¥--~rn, all [c
Impaci
L_=r~e
lmpac:
· ~ Yes !~No
· '~ Yes I~No
~Ye~ ,'~No
~Yes 're'No
~Y.- !:No
i-'Yes F-No
_n.,¥~ _nNo
IMPACT ON -~NERGY
energy ~uO~iW ~/~0 --, .~
F.=amoies chac -..,'ouid aopiv :o ,:=tumn Z (
'~p~o
NOISE ,;¢'"~ ODOR IMPACTS
· ~l~;;n8 '~i4~a i.3OO f~ c~ ~ '~c~pi(~l. school or ¢[ner ~en~idve'
· Oders wiU occur roudne{y (more ~nan one hour per dayj.
· Proposed ,E¢]on will re~ove na~[ ba~ie~ ~ac would ac= ~ z
1
~ .'"'""'~, a I [ ,:o
' .~'r6derz~e
Impac~
2
Can lmpac: Sa
~Yes ~JNc
b'Yes I~No
iMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
18. Will Proposed A~'Jon affe_¢~i public healLh and
· Prspo~ A~oa may ~e a d~k of ~pios~on or r~lem~ of hazardous
subs~nc~ (i.~ oil, p~d~d~, ~qemiols. ~diadon. a[~) in ~e event of
accident or uDse[ conditions, or ~ere may be ~ d~ronic iow level
disch~ or
· Proposed ,&~on may r~ult in ~e bu~a[ o[ "~ous w~z~'
ingenious,
. _Cccra._-- f~c~iid~ for one million or more gailons p~ [iquifi~ naomi
~ or o~ EJ~mm~Je liquid.
· ?~pos~ ~on may r~sui~ in ~e ~czvadoa or o~er dis~rbance
wid~in 2.000 ~eet of ~ site ~ Eot ~e dbposai ai solid or hazardous
· Od~e~ impa~
i'-iy~ C.No
~Yes
~Ye~ eno
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTE.R
OF COMMUNITY OR NE~GHBORHOOO
19. Will pro posed &c-~on a~e--.~ the ~4ta.~.¢-=.~ oi: ~e e>'J 'a~-o~.C~m unity{
~t ~ouid ~p[¥ to c~lumn 2
· Th~ permanes~t ~apulafion off ~e ~. ~ or
proi~ W Io~ W I~y ~ g~ by mom ~
· ~e muni~paI budget For ~i~ ~di~ ar a~m~g.s~c~
· ?raDosed a~an '~1[ ~e ~ ~ge in ~e d~nsiw 0¢ I~d use.
· ?~pose~ A~an ~il mal~c~ or eiimin~m ~xbfing ?~cHiti~. %~r~
ar &re~ of hi.cdc ~m¢a~ m ~e ~mmum~F
- Oeveiapment wii[ ~m ~ ~nd Car &ddidanal cammuni~ se~ic~
· ?roaased A~an will sec ~n impa~nt pinch.nc ?ar ?umre proi~-
C
m.
ZO. :s :,~ere. cr is ~_,~ likd¥ '~ '~e. 2ui~ilc c=nc-cversy .-e!ace~ co pote_qdal adve~e environmental ir..tr, ac=f
oo~.0o~oooooo
- '= 8' :e z
~0.~ ~ ~.~: O0
o o o00 .,.,~ o o00 ~
ooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooo~ooo~m
E.E ,EE:E
~=~o~= ~i~oo~ooooooooooooo~ooo
~ E.E'E E~ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E.E E E E E E m ~ m m m m m m m
==o,o.oo =, ooo oo.oooo.oooooooooo======
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZOZ
ZZ~ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
o:o , E E--
~~n~m~oooooooooooo~, , , , ,
ooq~qooooooqq~qqqoo
oo.oo'o,oo~
zzzzzzz~ ~Ooooooooooooooo~~ o
~~ E'E~ E E E~i~ E'E:E,E E E E E
~'=m,mm,m'mccc=:c'== [,~ cc =
c:)
~mmmmmmmO0000
~qqqqq,qqqq
oOooOooooOoooooooooboooO0 oo0
ooooooooooooooooooooooooo ~.~
~gm~.~-~°°°°°m°°°°°°°°°°°°°m°°m°°mm~.°°°; ,
O0000~O000m~m~m~mO0000000'o0oo0oooo 00~
O0 000000000 O0
Oo
00000000000
000
oo00o6bb6'~ 0000 000!000 ~00~8~'~~'~. 0
dd dd dd~'dddd~d
d ddd ~ o~ dd
~0~--0--~0oO~ 0'0 Ooo~oooooooooob'O~O~'~'~
0000000000000 O0 ~0000,00000000000000000000
m~ddd~ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd~dd
.~. · ~.~
W ddt- N
ooo~N~ dd~NSdww~dddddddd~dddSK~ddd6ooo ....... ....
0000000000000
zo000000o~
~~mmffimmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmzz~~i
oooo0oo0oo~0o00o'~o'o0-~-'~'~'~'~'o~
0
~ oo ooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~ ~~ ooo
ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddqqd~~dddd