Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSouthold 4C SEQRARESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - ~--~" 3 ~ 3 / ;and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that tkis action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS wkich said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared !o the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and tl-ds proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board ismes a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA_ roles and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the (Re) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM~ 1000 -- ~"'~ - t_/,_ O~ ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS wlfich said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or b) the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLLTTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation from (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by SCTM# 1000 - ~-~1' - ~ -- ~' ; and WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action them is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) b) c) d) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted an LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules and regulations. RESOLUTION WHEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Southold is considering a change in the zoning designation fi-om (B) GENERAL BUSINESS Zoning District Designation to the (RO) RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Zoning District Designation of a certain parcel of land lying in the Town of Southold identified by sct ooo I l_ WHEREAS the Town Board found that for the above action there is no other involved agency; that for the above action the Town Board is the Lead Agency; that this action is an Unlisted Action; all pursuant to SEQRA Rules and Regulations 6 NYCRR 617.1 et. seq. and Chapter 44 of the Southold Town Code; and WHEREAS, GEIS which said "no further SEQRA review required" when "Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require further SEQRA review if: a) b) d) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteriaJthreshold; and WHEREAS, the Town Board nevertheless conducted ma LEAF pursuant to SEQRA in addition to the GEIS findings statement; be it further RESOLVED by the Town Board that this proposed project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts and therefore the Town Board issues a NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to the SEQRA rules mad regulations. The LEAF (Long Environmental Assessment Form) within applies for each of the specific parcels for the group known as "SOUTHOLD 4C" of the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study "Recommendation Discussion". The attached LEAF is identJcal for each parcel except for the following information: Section A(2)- Regarding Total Acreage Section B(1)(j)- Regarding Linear Frontage Section C(5)- Regarding Maximum potential development of the site These Sections currently reflect the combined totals of all the other parcels in "SOUTHOLD 4C". The individual information for each parcel is found in SubStudy 1 and/or Substudy 2. (Substudy 1 and Substudy 2 are attached hereto and incorporated by reference.) A GElS was conducted for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study. The GElS and the SEQRA Findings Statement are incorporated herein by reference. In conformance with this portion of the SEQRA regulations, cdteda and thresholds have been established to indicate when additional SEQRA review is required for actions carried out in conformance with the recommendations of the (County Route 48 Corridor) Lend Use Study. These cdteria and thresholds state when additional SEQRA review is required. Among the criteda and thresholds established is the following: "1. Changing the zoning category of a parcel from any one of the industrial or commercial zones in the Town of Southold to a single family residential or Agricultural Zone shall not require further SEQRA review "2. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from a higher density residential zone to a lower density residential zone or Agricultural Conservation Zone shall not require fur[her SEQRA review." 3. Changing the Zoning Category of a parcel from one industrial zone to another industrial zone, or from one commercial zone to another commercial zone, or from an industrial zone to a commercial zone shall not require fur[her SEQRA review if: a) the proposed new zoning category for the subject parcel is consistent with the zoning of surrounding parcels, or the proposed change of zone does not permit higher intensity use of the subject parcel as compared to the existing zone in terms of lot coverage, building height, parking requirments, traffic, impervious area, drainage, and setbacks, or c) the proposed change zone does not take place in a designated historical area, a critical environmental area, areas of Iow depth to groundwater, or contain or are adjacent to freshwater wetlands or tidal wetlands, or d) the proposed change of zone is consistent with the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study and past land use plans of the Town of Southold" and this proposed action meets this criteria/threshold; and Town of Southold Long Environmental Assessment Form for Southold 4C Proposed Change of Zone on Town Board's Own Motion B to RO CR 48 & Horton Lane Southold Project Sponsor: Town Board of the Town of Southold Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 1.19.71 Contact Person: Elizabeth A. Neville, Town Clerk Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, New York 11971 (516) 765-1801 Project Description: The action is the proposed rezoning of approximately 5.96 acres of land in the Town of Southold. The existing zoning is B and the proposed zoning is RO. The action has fromage along CR 48 & Horton Lane, in the hamlet of Southold. Specific Suffolk County Tax Map Numbers (SCTM#) can be found on the next page of this EAF. The action is a change of zone on the Town Board's own motion based on the County Route 48 Land Use Study, the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and the Findings related to that study. Y Southold 4C - EAF I & Property Owners: SCTM#, 059-3-31 059-4-8 059-4-9 063-1-1,6 Owaef's ilallle and address. David Cichanowicz, 165 Wood Lane, Peconic, NY, 11958 Timothy Gray, Soundview Avenue, Southold, N'Y, 11971 Jimbo Real~ Corp., 50800 Main Road, P.O. Box 1465, Southold, NY, 11971 601 Albany Ave. Corp., 100 North Center Street, Newton Falls, OH, ~.~.~.4 ~.- 1321 A. Site Description Ph~ical setting of overall proJect, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: [~ Urban [-~ Induslxial ~] Commercial ~ Residential (suburban) Total acreage of project arex 5.96 acres APPROXIMATE ACREAGE: Meadow or Brushland (Non-Agricultural) Forested Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland., pasture, etc.) Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) Water Surface Area Unvegetated (Kock, earth or fill) Landscaping and/or Residential Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces/Urban Other (indicate type) PRESENTLY 5.37 acres AFTER COMPLETION 5.37 acres 0.53 acres 0.53 acres What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? Riverhead Sandy Loam [0-3% slopes] & Riverhead Sandy Loam [3-8% slopes] a. Soil drainage: 100.00% Well Drained Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? a. What is depth to bech-ock? NO NA Appro~matepereentageofpmposedpmjentwith slopes:  ~l~A 100.00 % 1~15% % 15%or~eamr % Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, sim or disWict, listed on the Slam or the National Registers of Historic Places?. NO 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? NO 8. What is the depth of the wamr table? 42' Source? SCDHS 1998 Groundwater Maps and USGS Quadangle sheets 9. Is site located over a primmy, principal, or sole source aquifer?. YES 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the projeat area? NO : Southold 4C - EAF 2 II. 12. Docs project site contain any species of plant or animal that is identified as threatened or endangered? According to: Cramer Consulting Group and Town of Southold Planning Staff. ldantify cadh species: Am there any unique natural land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) NO NO 13. 14. 15. 16. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? NO lfy~s, ~xplmn: Does the present site include scenic views know to be important to the community? NO However general character oftbe area has been identified as scenic. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NO a. Name of Siream and name of River to which it is tributary: Lakes. ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name: b. Size (In acres) NO 17. 18 19 20. Is the site served by existing public utilities? a) If Yes, does suffieiant capacity exist to allow connection? b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? YES YES NO Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-/~, Section 303 and 304? NO Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of thc ECL, and 6 NYCRR 6177 NO Has thc site ever been used for thc disposal of solid or hazardous wastes7 NO B= Project Description: Physical dimensions and scale of project Note: As the proposed a~tion is for a change of zone on the Town of Southold Town Board's own motion there is no physical alteration of any property. Therefore these questions am not applicable in this section. More relevant information can be found in Section C of this EAF. Also please refer to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). Total contiguous acreage owned or conlxollcd by project sponsor. NA Pmjeet acreage to be developed; initially: iNA Ultimately: NA Project acreage to remain undeveloped: NA Lang~ of project, in miles (if appropriate): NA If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed: NA Number of off-smut parking spaec~; Existing: NA Proposed: NA Maximum vehicular lrips gan~ated per hour (upon completion of project)? NA Southold 4C - EAF 3 9. 10. I1. 12. 13. If residential: Number and type of bousing units: NA One Family Two Family Multiple Family Ultimately Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed sm~cture? Height: Width: Linenr lent offrontage along a public thoroughfare project will occopy is? 927' Condominium Length: How much nntuml material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) will he removed from the site? NA Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? c. Will upper sobs oil be stockpiled for reclamation? NA NA NA NA How many acres of vegetation (lxe~, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? NA Will any mature forest (over 100 y~am old) or other locally important vegetation be removed by this projscO. NA If single phase project; Anticipated period of consa'uction in months, (including demolition). If mufti-phased; ~. Total number ofpheses anticipated (number): b. Anticipa*~-A date of commencement phase, (including demolition}. Month: c. Approximate completion date of final phase Month: d ls phase I fiancfionally dependent on subsequent phases? Yes: Will blasting occur during conslxuctiun? Number of lobs generated; during cons~uction: NA; Number of jobs eliminated by this project Will project require relocation ofeny projects or facilities? Is surfa~ liquid waste disposal involved? [t'yes, indicate ~ of waste (sewage, indus~xial, etc.) and amount: b. Name of water body int~ which effluent will be discharged: Is subsurface liquid wasm disposal involved? If yes, indicate Type of waste (sewage, induslxial, etc.) end amount: b. If yes, indicate method of disposal: After project is complete: NA NA NO NA NA NO NO NO 14. 15. 16_ Will surface area o fen existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? Explain: Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? Will thc project gcnea~te solid waste? If yes, what is the mount per month (in runs): b. If yes. will an existing solid waste facility be used? c. If yes, give name: NO NO NO Southold 4C - EAF 4 c. If Yes, explain: 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? o. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal (toes/month)? b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? 19. Will project routinely produce odors (mom than one hour per day)? 20. Will preject produce operating noise cxcecding the local ambient noise 21_ Will project result in an increase in energy use If yes, indicate type(s): 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity (gallons/minute): 23. Total anticipated v,~er usage pm' day (gallons/day): 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? Yes, explain: 25. Approvals Required.' CID,, Town, Village Board Yes City, Town~ Village Planning Board Yes City, Town Zoning Board Yes City, County Health Department Yes Other Local Agencies Yes Other Regional Ageanles Yes State Agencies Yes Federal Agencies Yes Will any ~ not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? No No No No X No X No ,X 'No X No X ChangeofZone X X X Type C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action iovolve a planning or zoning decision? If Yes, indicate decision required? zoning amendment [~ zoning variance site plan I.~ new/revision of master plan 2_ What is the zoning cl~-ssification(s) of thc site? special use permit ~ subdivision resource management plan other B NO NO NO NO NO NO NA NO Submittal Date YES Southold 4C -EAF 5 What is the meximum potential development of thc site if dcv¢lopcd as pcrmittccl by thc present zoning? 7'7886 square feet of commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, etc. Computation is based on a sWaight arithmetic computation based on pcrcent of lot coverage as allowed in the code. Actual yield under a detailed site plan may b~ less. Estimate represents maximum potential yield. What is thc proposed zoning of thc site? RO What is the maximum potenfml development oftbo site if developed as permit~.d by the proposed zoning? 51925 square feet of ofiiee/light commercial buildings. Estimate does not figure roads, drainage, parking, ete. Computation is baaed on a straight arithmetic computation based on percant of lot coverage as allowed in the code. ACtual yield trader a detailed site plan may be less. Estimate represants maximum potential yield_ the proposed action consistent with tho recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? YES What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 1/4 mile na:lius of proposed action? Land uses include: agricultural, single-family residence, eoatmereial. Zoning ineladas AC, RS0, R40, LB, B. 8 Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 1/4 mile? YES 9. If the proposed a~tion is the subdivision of lenti, how many lots are proposed? NA a_ What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10 Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? NO 11. Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (ranreation~ education, police, fire protection)? NO z. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? NA ] 2. Will the proposed acdon result in the generation of ffaff't c significantly above present levels? NO a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? D. Informational Details PIease refer to the Generic Environmental lmpa~t Statement and Findings Statement for the County Route 48 Corridor Land Use Study prepared by the Town of Southold). E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Name of Preparer: Cramcr Consulting Group Date: Signature: Title: Consultants to the Town Board I certify that the information provided above is tree to the best of my knowledge. ApplicanffSponsor Name: Date: Signature: Title: Southnld 4C - EAF 6 .-"~, R~ponsibiiity oi Lead ~ener~i Iniormaiion ~2aac~ ¢_~re.~ullvi The E=:mpl~ provid~ ~re co.~sis[ :he reviewe; ~y shawin~ sr~es oF [mpa~ ~nd wherever pos~ble ~he Xqre~hoid me~nitude ch~ wouid ~g~er a response m co(u,mn 2_ The ex~mc/~ are ]ene~lly appiic~b[e ~hrou~houc ~er moss ~ku~dons_ Jut ~or ~ny specific ~rojecz or s~ce o~er ~ple~ ~n6~cr lower ~hresholdj m~y be The imaac: oF e~cq proj~_ on azch ~i~e, in e~ch )o~i~F, wiII v~mF. ~nese~ore, ~e ~amp)es are illu~-~dve have b~ o~es~ ~ [uld~cm ~ney do nc~ sons~mce ~n ~ve [~ o6 impa~ ~d bqresho[~ co an~er each qu~d The number 06 ~pl~ per qu~Jon do~ hOC indlc~:e ~e impo~c~ 06 ezd~ qu~on. In (dend~in( [mp~CJ. consider [on~ mm. shorn m~ ~d ~Jmla~e instr~lans (Read caze~ll~ a. Answer eac~ of :he ~ que~Jons in P~ ~ Answer Y~ ii tbe~ will be any c~ If ~swe~ng Yes to z question ~en ~q~k the appr~p~le b:~ (column I ar ~ Io indicate ~e pote~ti~ size of the impAc; ff impa~ ~hoid equ~s or ezc~ds ~y ex. pie prodded, ch~ ~lumn ~ If impacz will occur bu~ · ~shold is lower ~ e~ple, ~nec~ ~lumn 1. ~. Ide~d~ing ~t ~ ~p~ will be pctend~lly I~ge (column ~ do~ not m~ ~st Any t~ge impure mu~ ~ ~v~uated in PA~ 3 ~o det~ine signifi~nca. [den~ing ~n impac: in ~{umn 2 simply as~ ~at it be l~k~ At a_ If reviewe~ h~ do~bt ~o~ s~ of the Z~pzc; ~en consider the impsc: ~ p~mndally l~e ~d procsed to PA~ 3. E If a ~otendaily I~e im~ ~ed in ~lumn 2 ~ be mit~gAt~ by cn~ge(s) ~n ~e pro~e~ to · small to mode~te [m0am. Also ;4~ ~e Yes hex in column · A No response indi~tes ~at ~h mu~ be ~l~ned in P~ 3. IMPACT ON LAND Will ~e pro~<3sed ac-Jan remJit in a physi~i ~ha.nge ~ ~e ~YES ~amples ~t woufo ~ppJy .o c~lumn 2 ,Any cons~on on sJoo~ of 15% or ~rea[~-, [15 ~oo~ rise per lC0 {out o~ [~g~L cr where ~e g~ slop~ in ~e pm~em ~ Co~on on I~d where ~e de~ ~ ~e ~r ~le ~ C~on of p~ ~ ~ For 1.~ ar ma~ Common ~ ~d ~ ~m~ ~ ~ or gen~l[y wi~in 3 ~ of ~dn~ ~ su~_ Con~on ~ ~[I ~ndnue ~or mom ~ I year or in. lye mom ~ one ~h~e or ~ 5~vadon ~or minin~ pu~as~ ~ac wouid ;~ave mom ~zn ~ons o~ nzm~l m~dal ~.~. m~ ar soiU ~er yezr_ C~ns~an or ~ion o~ = s~ni~C/~ndfiil. Cons~on in = ~i~a~ ~aa~ay_ Ocher SmAll to PotentiAl .Can ImpAc~ E Mcder=-t~ L~r- ~e [ MitJcJated By Im~ac: impact ~ Project Chan~ I. Will d',,e;e be an =Ae ~i~. (i.e.. cfiffs, dun=s, g~logic=l ~ormzdcns. s;r_]l-../I · ~oec.~fiC !and ~orms: ?cten~i~l © F~' Y es ~No OY~ W{il proposed ac. Jan affect am/non-~rote__o~-ed ~-..isdnz or new body of water? ' [~ eYES ~amol~ ~at would a~olv to column 2 { 10% inc~e or de~-e~e in ~e su~ac~ area or any ~dy or water Cons~Jon of a boo o~ w~ter &ac ~c~d~ 10 acres o~ ~uffac~ area_ UYez O,~ UNo $. Will Proposed Ac-~on &ffe~ suvaco Or groundwacert ~ ~amgl~ ~zc would ~ppiy :o. column 2 · Proposed A~cn will r~uire z dN~nzrge peril · ?re=used A~an r~uir~ u=e of t sourc~ a~ wa~er ~ut does not have ia;royal · Propos~ A~ion ~ui~ w~mr sup~iy f~m weils with greater ~an 45 ggilons per minum ~gm;ing · Liquid ~ffJu~qt will be ~ey~ o~ ~e si~ ~ fadii~ which pr~endy do nat ~ or · P~s~ A~on ~uld dEy. · Pmp~ A~on wil[ [~y · ?roCos~ A~en wiil · ?roaos~ Ac~an 0 [] [] [] U © I[-iye~ I~No i'q y-,~ ~o i-iye, s {"'iNc 5. Will ;rooosed ac'San al~., dminas~e ~low or ~a~s~r w~te? ~dno~ . E~pl~ ~ac wo~d z~piy ~ column 2 ' Prcmos~ A~an ~auld ~qan[e flood water 7 I-~N¢ - ?ro¢osed Aczion may cause ~ubs[_=ndal erosion. - ?rogosed Ac:ion is incompac~bie .,4ch ~zisdn~ drainz~e patterns. · ?roposed AcrJon *viii ailow development in a designated floodway · OCher imoact:: ~ Fq 2 LarGe Mitiga[ed Proiect Char~ I~Ye~ LlaNo IMPACT ON AIR % ',/Viii ~roposed ac'don affect air quali~! ,~ Proposed A~on win r~uk in ~e incme~don of mc~e ~an ~ ton o~ ra~u~e per hour. Emission rate of totaJ con~min~n~ wiil ~c:~ 5 Ihs_ per hour ar a heac saurc~ pmdudn] mo~ ~n 10 md[ion ~'s per hour. Propos~ ~cdon will ~IIow a~ in~e in ~e amount o~ land cammi~ed to indu~aI use_ Pro~os~ action will ~i[~ ~n in~e in ~e d~i~ of indusadai deveIopment wi~i, ~i~ ind~I are~. IMPACT ON PLAN~ AND ANIMALS Wii[ Prooo~ed Ac-Jon aCfec: any threatened or .&edu~on of one or ~ore sp~ [~ on ~e N~ lisz. usin~ the site. over ar near s~e or ~aund an ~e site. RemovaJ of any ~o~on of a ~d~i ar ~i~ifica~t wildlife ~[I Pmpas~ A~On ~d~lly aff~ no~or non~ndange~ s~l ~ ~YE5 ~ampl~ ~t would ~ppiy to column 2 Prooos~ Ac~on ~uid ~ub~nd~ily int~em wi~ migr~to~ ~ish, sheflfish ar wildlife Propoied A~on r~ui~ ~e .~mova[ of ma~ ~an of ma~re for~c (over 100 yea~ =f ageJ or o~er [o~ly impa~nt iMPACT ON AGRICUL~RAL ~ND R~OURC~S The :roccs~ ~on wcuid se~er. ~ or limit ICONS I~ye~ ~Na ~Yes ~Yes ['~Yes ~_JNa ~Y~ ~No I]~'yes I--~No agricultural land. o~ agrlcuJtural [and or, if bca~ed in =-n Agricuituca! gisu-ic= mar=. :h~n 2.S ~cres o~ ~ricul~r~l I~ad. · The ~ropas~ ~Jon would dis~pc or prevent ins~ll~don o~ [and management ~tems (~_, subsu~ac~ d~in lines, ou~e~ ditches. s[:ip cz~pping}: or Q~ate ~ me~ ~oc such me~ur~ [~g. cause ~ [ie[d m drain poa~[y due to :mcat: ?rciec: Chanc_a IMPACT ON AESTHL~qC RESOURCES . Will proposed acJon aHe~ aesthetic r~sourc~_~ (If n~Ea~, u~e ~e ~ua~ ~ Addendum ~nS~cn 6~7.20, Ap~dk ~ampl~ ~at would apply ~ column Proposed land us~, ar pmie~ comoan~ obvia~iy ~erenc from or in sharp can--t :o ea=ent su~unding l~d use pa~m~, whe~er man~ade or nature{_ Propos~ land ~. or ~roj~ cam¢onen~ vbible :o us~q of a~edc r~aurc~ which wail ~limintt~ or signi~qdy ~c~ ceir ~njoymen~ of ~e a~&edc qualid~ of ~c ~ourc~. Praie~ campanen= ~a: will r~ult screening of scenic ,ne~ kn~n O~er imaa~: IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will ?m~ a~on imca~ any ¢~ or hs~dc or pal~ncologi~l impo~c~? ' ~NO ~mpl~ ~ would ~pply can~u~ ~ ~y ~li~ or of h~dc · Any imga~ ~ ~ ~1o~1 site ar ~assil b~ ~o~ ~in ~e ~raje~ · Pro~os~ A~on will comer ar~a~lagicai sit~ on ~e NYS ~ite C O ONc IMPACT ON OPC--N SPAC~ AND RECREA~CN 13. Will Proposed Ac'don &~ec:_. '-.he qUa~ldry or quaiic'/ of -_~irdng or ~u~u?e ape.- spaces or te~eacionaJ appor~unitie.s~ ~ - ,. Examples ~at would zppl.v ta column 2 ~C) CiYES ] T:,e e,ma.ent for cio ur a fu .,e A major ted_'uc~an of an c~en spa~ imOar-~nc m ~e c=mmunie/_ · Other imaac-.~: ?cpc: · 2rooosad Action F.O [o¢~.~e within c~le C_--.~.[ · Preoosed Action Mil imoa~ Ce use. funcuon e~ eniovmen~ o¢ ohe · Ceher impa~: IMPACT ON TP, ANS,~ORTA~QN ~. Will :here be ~_n eCf'e~ :o ~,(is~i.m~ ~nsoo~z[ion ~s~ .Mtemdon o~ $resenc p~Eems o~ movement of D~pJe ~d/or ~aods. ~roposed A~ion ,~il msuic in maior ~c problem. Other img~c~: ~ .'Ye~ L~No n¥~s NOISE ~,;'~".OOCR IMPACT~ or '-he ?:cccsed · 5l~5::ng wi(bin LS00 fee~ c~ & hc~o~c~[, schccl or ocher sensitive · Odors wH[ ac~Jr roudneJy (more ~n one hour per dzy)- · Proposed A. cdon will praduc~ ooer~rJn~ noise ~ceedin~ 1 2 3 Can lmDac: Se : 'Y¢~ LJ,'4o EYes ~-~Nc I~--JYes f~" N a 'r~ Yes ~-JNo IMPACT ON PUBUC HEALTH 18. Will Proposed Ac'=k~n effe_c: public hezl~h ~nd sa~ ~O OYES ~ampJ~ bgat would apply ~o column 2 · ~rop~5~ A~O~ m&y ~e ~ ~sk o¢ ~plasion cr ~le~se o~ h~rdous subs~nc~ ¢.~ oi[.'¢~ddd~. ~emic~b. ~diadon. ~ta) in ~e event af ~cs~dent ar uDset coddidans, or ~ere may be ~ d~ronic I~ level dis~&r~ or ~m~sion. · ~rcposed A~o~ m~y r~uit in ~e burial o~ "h~aus w~' in zny infe~ous, ~) · S(oraS~ ~dlic~ for one million or more ~Hons of ii~uifi~ n~i · Pramas~ ~¢don may r~uit in ~e ~czvadcn or o~er d~rbanc~ wid~in 2.~0 fe~ of a site ~ mar ~e dbposai a¢ solid ~r hazardous · Od~er imo~: IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF COMMUNITY OR NI~GHRORHOOO 19. Wii[ proposecl ac'5on affe--~'~ ~e ~la~-~c~- a f ~e e.~ommuniw? ~-=,~.ple~ ~t ~ld ~ply ~ ~lumn 2 · ~e munidp~ bu~t for ~i~ will i~e ~ mom ~ 5% ' Progos~ a~an '411 mnrli~ · ?~Dos~ A~on will re,lace or ~limin~ce ~n~ ¢adlides. ar ~re~ of his~dc ~m¢a~ ~ ~e ~mmunirl · OeveioDment wiil ~te ~ ~nd for zddidon~l ¢=mmuni~ se~ic~ (e4. schools. ~alice ~d fi~ · 7~oosed A~on will ~ec ~n impo~nt ' Cheer im~a~ c,r~ ~xo ~Y~ 0 0 m.~~do~oooooooo~O~OO~OOOOOO~ ~~ .o:o,o.o,o~e ® m.e e.~,m e e e e e m o o o00 '~'~ o o00 ~m E~ ' · o ...... '- ~ ~ 'B '~ ......... ...... ooo-o 8°°°°°°°°>°°°°°°°8°°°°°°°°°°°°.°°° EE E'E!E ~,E E E'E~'~ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E ~ oo .o,o.ooooooooooooooooo o -~1-~-~ E EJ-~-~J E EiE!E]E E EE E'E:E E E E-~J-~-~'-~ E~-- .,o,oooo'oo.o~o~~ ...... >> ~ >>>~>>.>>>>>>.>>>~> No dd~dd 'd'd6 oN oo oo0o oooo0o~oooooooo0oo0o0oo00 oo0 ~O00~~~ZZZZZOOZZZO0~O00000000 oooo~ ooooommmmmmmooooooo~ oooooooooo~ oo ~o '~o ~ o O~ ~ O0 ~ 0 0 ~d'd 'd 'ddddddd'ddddddddddd~d'dddddddddddd~d : : : : o. ,o. q q o. q q ,o. :q q o. q ~oooog~mooO'om~m~oogoo~~~~ oooooo0~oooooooo.oooooo.oo~ooo ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooq .~~d~6 .qq~qqqqqqqqqq